alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Intrinsic oxygen fugacity measurements on seven chondrites, a pallasite, and a tektite and the redox state of meteorite parent bodies      

      January 1, 1984    

Intrinsic oxygen-fugacity (fO2) measurements were made on five ordinary chondrites, a carbonaceous chondrite, an enstatite chondrite, a pallasite, and a tektite. Results are of the form of linear log fO2−1T">fO2−1T plots. Except for the enstatite chondrite, measured results agree well with calculated estimates by others.

The tektite produced fO2 values well below the range measured for terrestrial and lunar rocks. The lowpressure atmospheric regime that is reported to follow large terrestrial explosions, coupled with a very high temperature, could produce glass with fO2 in the range measured.

The meteorite Salta (pallasite) has low fO2 and lies close to Hvittis (E6). Unlike the other samples, results for Salta do not parallel the iron-wüstite buffer, but are close to the fayalite-quartz-iron buffer in slope.

Minor reduction by graphite appears to have taken place during metamorphism of ordinary chondrites. fO2 values of unequilibrated chondrites show large scatter during early heating suggesting that the constituent phases were exposed to a range of fO2 conditions. The samples equilibrated with respect to fO2 in relatively short time on heating. Equilibration with respect to fO2 in ordinary chondrites takes place between grades 3 and 4 of metamorphism. Application of P − T − fO2 relations in the system C-CO-CO2 indicates that the ordinary chondrites were metamorphosed at pressures of 3–20 bars, as it appears that they lay on the graphite surface.

A steep positive thermal gradient in a meteorite parent body lying at the graphite surface will produce thin reduced exterior, an oxidized near-surface layer, and an interior that is increasingly reduced with depth; a shallow thermal gradient will produce the reverse. A body heated by accretion on the outside will have a reduced exterior and oxidized interior. Meteorites from the same parent body clearly are not required to have similar redox states.

## Citation Information
!		

"	
#$		%
"		
#&$"'(()%&*+, -*

.	/		.	 $	
0


2
	$. 1&&2& 3& 4%& Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 3
 	

	


		
	 
	
!		

"	
#$		%
"		
#&$"'(()%&*+, *

-./01234501627

89:;9:5501627

-<428=>2?

@4<42

0A

-24<=>6B934=4B5<12 C
	$(		$D	

'(()%&*++EF(D

8=>=3G:3H.71<4=.3

IJKKL

I

JJK

C(

I%M

N7=3/=O<>P??72AA

*KE)&(C M

'QC& FDIJER

S<=>=3GP??72AA

*KE)&(C M

'QC& FDIJER

T2G=A4272?PG2345<12UP??72AA

 )% I)%

KRJ+%V% %F

W%*

%D% XW )FC(**K

$YKJJJL

I$$$YJRJR

Z2327<>N<74327-24<=>

5<12UP??72AA

(JK*+JLR

[&\I%&% I%)C(((

*KE)&(C M

'QC& FDIJER

P330<>T2O.74A

T2O.74]2<7 8=>2?-<42

JL KJL

JR J*JR

-./01234:1<G2A

J*JR^^IWI( D& % M	_		DC`

KJJJL^^ I M	_		DC`

KJL^^IWI( D& % M	_		DC`

JJK^^	(D M	_		DC`

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 3
 	

	


		
	 
	
!		

"	
#$		%
"		
#&$"'(()%&*+, **

-./01234563078597/:;7375<41=1>1/9/:?/06/0371/9>

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19958-19959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 110]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank, as a part of its continuing effort to 
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and 
other Federal agencies to comment on the proposed information 
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The 
form will be used by banks to apply for comprehensive or political 
insurance coverage on foreign banks for letter of credit transactions. 
Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or 
electronically.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 1, 2009 to 
be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments and requests for additional information 
to Kimberly P. Nelson, Office of Management and Budget, Office of

[[Page 19959]]

Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB, Room 10202, Washington, DC 
20503, (202) 395-3787.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title and Form Number: Export-Import Bank of the United States 
Application for Issuing Bank Credit Limit (IBCL) Under Bank Letter of 
Credit Policy, EIB 92-36.
    OMB Number: 3048-0016.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information requested enables the applicant to 
provide Ex-Im Bank with the information necessary to process credit 
risk applications involving foreign letter of credit issuing banks.
    Affected Public: The form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Estimated Annual Respondents: 60.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 20 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 240.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: 1 to 12 times per year depending on 
the particular respondent's need/risk portfolio.

    Dated: April 24, 2009.
Solomon Bush,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-9843 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0478 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0478

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 478/2004 of 15 March 2004 on the release of securities for import licences for preferential sugar issued under Regulation (EEC) No 2782/76 **

*
Official Journal L 078 , 16/03/2004 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 478/2004

of 15 March 2004

on the release of securities for import licences for preferential sugar issued under Regulation (EEC) No 2782/76

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector(1), and in particular Article 22(2)(b) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) One of the Regulations repealed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 of 30 June 2003 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2003/2004, 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 marketing years for the import of cane sugar under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements and amending Regulations (EC) No 1464/95 and (EC) No 779/96(2) was Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2782/76(3), which laid down detailed implementing rules for the importation of preferential sugar.

(2) Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 provides as a transitional measure that licences issued under Regulation (EEC) No 2782/76 may be used provided that loading took place and/or import declarations were accepted before 1 July 2003.

(3) It has become clear that these transitional measures do not cover the case where licences provided for by Regulation (EEC) No 2782/76 and issued before 1 July 2003 could not be used because of the entry into application of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003.

(4) Provision should therefore be made for the securities on licences which have been unusable since 1 July 2003 to be released.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The securities on import licences issued under Regulation (EEC) No 2782/76 which could not be used because of the entry into application of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 may be released forthwith.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 July 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 March 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1, Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2) OJ L 162, 1.7.2003, p. 25.

(3) OJ L 318, 18.11.1976, p. 13.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3299 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3299

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian tribes to 
     receive charitable contributions of apparently wholesome food.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2012

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian tribes to 
     receive charitable contributions of apparently wholesome food.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF APPARENTLY WHOLESOME FOOD TO 
              INDIAN TRIBES.

    (a) In General.--Section 170(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) and (E) as 
        subparagraphs (E) and (F), respectively, and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Special rule for indian tribes.--
                            ``(i) In general.--For purposes of this 
                        paragraph, an Indian tribe (as defined in 
                        section 7871(c)(3)(E)(ii)) shall be treated as 
                        an organization eligible to be a donee under 
                        subparagraph (A) with respect to apparently 
                        wholesome food (as defined in section 22(b)(2) 
                        of the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food 
                        Donation Act (42 U.S.C. 1791(b)(2)) (as in 
                        effect on the date of the enactment of this 
                        subparagraph)) only.
                            ``(ii) Use of property.--For purposes of 
                        subparagraph (A)(i), if the use of the 
                        apparently wholesome food donated is related to 
                        the exercise of an essential governmental 
                        function of the Indian tribal government 
                        (within the meaning of section 7871), such use 
                        shall be treated as related to the purpose or 
                        function constituting the basis for the 
                        organization's exemption.''.
    (b) Extension of Special Rule for Food Inventory.--Clause (iv) of 
section 170(e)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking ``December 31, 2011'' and inserting ``December 31, 2013''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 31 

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate for lower 

prices for Medicare prescription drugs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. FRANKEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act to authorize the Secretary of Health and Human 

Services to negotiate for lower prices for Medicare prescription drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prescription Drug and 

5 Health Improvement Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NEGOTIATING FAIR PRICES FOR MEDICARE PRE7 SCRIPTION DRUGS. 

8 (a) NEGOTIATING FAIR PRICES.— 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 31 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–11 of the 

2 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–111) is 

3 amended by striking subsection (i) (relating to non4 interference) and by inserting the following: 

5 ‘‘(i) AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE PRICES WITH MAN6 UFACTURERS.—In order to ensure that beneficiaries en7 rolled under prescription drug plans and MA–PD plans 

8 pay the lowest possible price, the Secretary shall have au9 thority similar to that of other Federal entities that pur10 chase prescription drugs in bulk to negotiate contracts 

11 with manufacturers of covered part D drugs, consistent 

12 with the requirements and in furtherance of the goals of 

13 providing quality care and containing costs under this 

14 part.’’. 

15 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

16 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date of the 

17 enactment of this Act. 

18 (b) BIANNUAL REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Not later 

19 than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

20 and every 6 months thereafter, the Secretary of Health 

21 and Human Services shall submit to Congress a report 

22 on the negotiations conducted by the Secretary under sec23 tion 1860D–11(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

24 1395w–111(i)), as amended by subsection (a), including 

25 a description of how such negotiations are achieving lower 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 31 IS

1 prices for covered part D drugs (as defined in section 

2 1860D–2(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 

3 102(e)) for Medicare beneficiaries. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 24.2



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Daniel A, Hamann, or Deryl F. Hamann, or either of them, attorney for me and
in my name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great Western Bancorporation, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, to be filed or as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 with respect to the registration of the cumulative trust preferred securities of GWB Capital Trust I and the cumulative trust preferred securities of GWB Capital Trust II, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in
the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 31stday of August 2005,



/S/ Andrew C. Hove, Jr.Andrew C. Hove, Jr.
Present: All the Justices
ROBERT SCOTT LYNN PER CURIAM v. Record No. 981146 February 26, 1999
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
We awarded this appeal to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals of Virginia holding that the Circuit Court of Rockbridge County properly refused defendant's proffered Instruction L on "cooling off," Instruction O on "right to arm," and Instruction S on "relative strength and size" of the parties. Lynn v. Commonwealth , 27 Va. App. 336, 499 S.E.2d 1 (1998). For the reasons stated on the above issues in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment entered below. Affirmed

.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KE L B E R T H A NT ON I O D AP OL A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71093 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 133- 390 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. K e l be rth A nt oni o D apol a , na t i ve and c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of a B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s orderdi sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an 

# FI LED MA Y17 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSi m m i gr a t i on j udge ' s de ni a l of hi s appl i c a t i on f

orc anc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l . O ur j u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency' s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that D apol a f ai l ed t o sho w exce pt i on aland extre m el y unu sualhardshi p t o h i s U ni t ed S t at es ci t i ze n chi l dren. 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2(a) (2)( B ); Mendez–Castro v. Mukasey , 552 F . 3d 97 5, 97 9 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). T h e c o n te n tio n th a t th e B o ar df a ile dto p r o p e r lyc o n s id e ran dw e ig h a ll e v i d e n c e o f

h ar d s h i p d o e s n o tr a i s e ac o l o r ab l e du e p r o c e s s c l a i m. M ar t i nez–R os as v. G on zales , 4 2 4 F .3 d9 2 6 , 9 3 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D I SM I SSED .
Case 19-18292-RAM Doc 16 Filed 07/29/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-18292-RAM Doc 16 Filed 07/29/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-18292-RAM Doc 16 Filed 07/29/19 Page 3 of 3
From: Lori Gajewski <gajewski4@yahoo.com> 

Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2020 1:33 PM

To: Aaron Wernick <awernick@furrcohen.com>

Subject: further review

The attached payment made for services for WeRunAds was set up through Steven Bransfield SB&A 

Media to continue my business as an affiliate with Mr. Bransfield. The attached amount was paid to him 

with the understanding that I would have continued support. Where is that support now? 

Also, this was offered to me as a "scholarship". Now, where is the ongoing support for that?

Please review

thanks

Lori Gajewski

Case 19-21442-LMI Doc 117 Filed 02/26/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-21442-LMI Doc 117 Filed 02/26/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-21442-LMI Doc 117 Filed 02/26/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-21442-LMI Doc 117 Filed 02/26/20 Page 4 of 4
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: SAWSTOP HOLDING LLC,

Appellant

______________________ 

2021-2161

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/935,432.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID FANNING, SawStop, LLC, Tualatin, OR, argued 

for appellant SawStop Holding LLC. 

 WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by 

KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON,

FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Case: 21-2161 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2022
 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

April 11, 2022

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2161 Document: 27 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2022
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 30, 2009



| |     |                                  | 
| | --- | -------------------------------- | 
| | By: | /s/ MICHAEL R. LONG              | 
| |     | Michael R. Long                  | 
| |     | Chief Executive Officer,         | 
| |     | Chief Financial Officer          | 
| |     | and Principal Accounting Officer |
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Investigation of the geology and hydrology of the Mogollon Highlands of central Arizona: a project of the Arizona Rural Watershed Initiative      

      January 1, 2000    

View Document

The Mogollon Highlands of east central Arizona is a region of forested plateau and mountains, deep, sheerwalled canyons, and desert valleys. Known for its scenic beauty and characterized by a generally mild climate, the area, though still sparsely populated, attracts an increasing number of tourists and summer residents. Furthermore, the permanent population is expected to nearly double over the next 50 years. Consequently, there is increased pressure on the water resources of this area for several sometimes conflicting uses. Rational management of water resources is necessary to meet increased domestic requirements while ensuring an adequate supply of water for commercial and agricultural use, for Indian lands, and for preservation of valued environmental elements, including surface waters, riparian woodlands, forest and grassland areas, and wildlife and aquatic habitat. Such management requires an understanding of the relations among different components of the hydrologic system—recharge areas, surface flows, shallow aquifers, deep aquifers, discharge areas, and the regional ground-water flow system—and how each is affected by geology, climate, topography, and human use.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is conducting an assessment of the hydrogeology of the Mogollon Highlands in cooperation with the Arizona Department of Water Resources. The study, funded through the State’s Rural Watershed Initiative program, is one of three assessments being conducted by the USGS. Assessments also are underway in the Upper-Middle Verde River watershed and on the Coconino Plateau. Each study has as its objectives: (1) the collection, compilation, and evaluation of all existing geologic, hydrologic, and related data pertaining to the study area and the creation of a data base that is readily accessible to the public and (2) developing an understanding of the hydrogeologic framework, which is the relation between geologic and hydrologic properties, that can be used for water-- resources management purposes and that will support the development of an interpretive and predictive model to estimate the effects of climate and water use on the sustainability of regional water resources.

Although the three contiguous areas in north-central Arizona are being studied separately, a single data base is being constructed from which data on each area can be extracted separately.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Arizona Water Science Center, Tucson Office

520 N. Park Avenue, Suite 221Tucson, AZ85719United States

(520) 670-6671

(520) 670-5592 

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Mogollon Highlands
                  - Arizona

View All **
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements



  
 Exhibit 10.32 

2012 Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements 
 Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc has established the following annual cash compensation for non-employee members of its board of directors as follows: 

Board member: $55,000 
 Audit Committee Chair: $25,000 
 Compensation Committee Chair: $22,500 

Nominating Committee Chair: $20,000 
 Audit Committee member: $15,000 
 Compensation Committee member: $12,500

 Nominating Committee member: $10,000