alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Maps of runoff in the northeastern region and the southern Blue Ridge Province of the United States during selected periods in 1983-85      

      January 1, 1987    

View Document

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

Maps of annual runoff for two regions in the eastern United States were prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey for the Direct/Delayed Response Project being conducted by the U.S. EPA. These maps show annual runoff during water year 1984 in the northeastern region and in the Southern Blue Ridge Province.

Runoff from the northeastern region during the 1984 water yr ranged from 12 to 55 in.; this was 25 to 55% > average runoff for the 1951-80 period. Runoff from the Southern Blue Ridge Province during the 1984 water year ranged from 14 to 60 in.; this was 10 to 30% > the average runoff for the 1951-80 period.

A split sample analysis of the data for New York was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the runoff mapping procedure used in this report. A runoff map was prepared using one-half of the data base. The map was then used to estimate runoff at the gaging stations that were not used to develop the map. The values estimated from the split-sample map were found to differ from the actual recorded values by 9.9%.

The runoff maps are most accurate in areas with a relatively large concentration of gaging stations and little topographic variability. Conversely, the maps are least accurate in areas with few gaging stations and high topographic variability. Based on these criteria, those parts of the maps covering Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, are the most reliable. The least reliable parts of the maps are those along the North Carolina-Tennessee border and in parts of Maine.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Georgia
                  -  Maine
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  New Jersey
                  -  New York
                  -  North Carolina
                  -  Pennsylvania
                  -  Rhode Island
                  -  South Carolina
                  -  Tennessee
                  -  Vermont

View All **
# L_2004297EN.01000301.xml

| 22.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1651/2004

of 21 September 2004

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 as regards the amount of the aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 15(b) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 2(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 of 10 October 1990 on aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk (2) sets the amount of aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk. In view of the development in the price of casein and caseinates on the Community and world markets, the amount of the aid should be reduced. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 2(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 of 10 October 1990 on aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk (2) sets the amount of aid for the production of casein and caseinates from skimmed milk. In view of the development in the price of casein and caseinates on the Community and world markets, the amount of the aid should be reduced.

| (2) | Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 should be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90 should be amended accordingly.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article (2)1 of Regulation (EEC) No 2921/90, ‘EUR 4,80’ is hereby replaced by ‘EUR 3,30’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 September 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 279, 11.10.1990, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1325/2004 (OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 21).

2

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Megascale processes: Natural disasters and human behavior      

      January 1, 2009    

Megascale geologic processes, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, floods, and meteoritic impacts have occurred intermittently throughout geologic time, and perhaps on several planets. Unlike other catastrophes discussed in this volume, a unique process is unfolding on Earth, one in which humans may be the driving agent of megadisasters. Although local effects on population clusters may have been catastrophic in the past, human societies have never been interconnected globally at the scale that currently exists. We review some megascale processes and their effects in the past, and compare present conditions and possible outcomes. We then propose that human behavior itself is having effects on the planet that are comparable to, or greater than, these natural disasters. Yet, unlike geologic processes, human behavior is potentially under our control. Because the effects of our behavior threaten the stability, or perhaps even existence, of a civilized society, we call for the creation of a body to institute coherent global, credible, scientifi cally based action that is sensitive to political, economic, religious, and cultural values. The goal would be to institute aggressive monitoring, identify and understand trends, predict their consequences, and suggest and evaluate alternative actions to attempt to rescue ourselves and our ecosystems from catastrophe. We provide a template modeled after several existing national and international bodies. ?? 2009 The Geological Society of America.

## Citation Information
# .. .. - __r:-;J--

,-;

S, Birmingham, D, J,, Acids, alkalle, oila and

### solv~nte. Itt P. Cantor, ed, _Traumatic Medichte and Surgery for the Attorney. Washington, Butterworth, Inc., 1962, pp. 364-370,

# ~ 

# c



# l 

# l ..... I 

# 0 U1 U1 

# • I I
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-1052

_____________________________

DAKODA WEINSTEIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 

OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT 

PROGRAM and CARLOS CABRERA,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings.

Andrew D. Manko, Judge.

June 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses the appeal as untimely filed. See Fla. R. 

App. P. 9.110(b).

LEWIS, NORDBY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Dakoda Weinstein, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sarah C. Prieto, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of 

Revenue.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 474 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 474

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a five-year 
   extension to the homeless veterans reintegration programs and to 
  provide clarification regarding eligibility for services under such 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeless Veterans' Reintegration 
Programs Reauthorization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF HOMELESS VETERANS REINTEGRATION 
              PROGRAMS.

    Section 2021(e)(F) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2020''.

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR SERVICES UNDER HOMELESS 
              VETERANS REINTEGRATION PROGRAMS.

    Subsection (a) of section 2021 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``reintegration of homeless veterans into the labor 
force.'' and inserting the following:
    ``reintegration into the labor force of--
            ``(1) homeless veterans;
            ``(2) veterans participating in the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs supported housing program for which rental assistance 
        provided pursuant to section 8(o)(19) of the United States 
        Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(19)); and
            ``(3) veterans who are transitioning from being 
        incarcerated.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 474

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a five-year 
   extension to the homeless veterans reintegration programs and to 
  provide clarification regarding eligibility for services under such 
                               programs.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Mars 2020 Perseverance rover mast camera zoom (Mastcam-Z) multispectral, stereoscopic imaging investigation      

      February 15, 2021    

Mastcam-Z is a multispectral, stereoscopic imaging investigation on the Mars 2020 mission’s Perseverance rover. Mastcam-Z consists of a pair of focusable, 4:1 zoomable cameras that provide broadband red/green/blue and narrowband 400-1000 nm color imaging with fields of view from 25.6° × 19.2° (26 mm focal length at 283 μrad/pixel) to 6.2° × 4.6° (110 mm focal length at 67.4 μrad/pixel). The cameras can resolve (≥ 5 pixels) ∼0.7 mm features at 2 m and ∼3.3 cm features at 100 m distance. Mastcam-Z shares significant heritage with the Mastcam instruments on the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover. Each Mastcam-Z camera consists of zoom, focus, and filter wheel mechanisms and a 1648 × 1214 pixel charge-coupled device detector and electronics. The two Mastcam-Z cameras are mounted with a 24.4 cm stereo baseline and 2.3° total toe-in on a camera plate ∼2 m above the surface on the rover’s Remote Sensing Mast, which provides azimuth and elevation actuation. A separate digital electronics assembly inside the rover provides power, data processing and storage, and the interface to the rover computer. Primary and secondary Mastcam-Z calibration targets mounted on the rover top deck enable tactical reflectance calibration. Mastcam-Z multispectral, stereo, and panoramic images will be used to provide detailed morphology, topography, and geologic context along the rover’s traverse; constrain mineralogic, photometric, and physical properties of surface materials; monitor and characterize atmospheric and astronomical phenomena; and document the rover’s sample extraction and caching locations. Mastcam-Z images will also provide key engineering information to support sample selection and other rover driving and tool/instrument operations decisions.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Mars

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 57 (Friday, March 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 15542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10324]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Averox Inc. ("Averox") on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended February 20, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Yasser Ahmad, Chief Financial Officer of
Averox, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Yasser Ahmad
-----------------------
Name: Yasser Ahmad
Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 20, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2002)]
[Notices]
[Page 27484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X02-70503]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II--Continued





Department of Justice





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Antitrust Division



United States v. Microsoft Corporation; Public Comments; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 86 / Friday, 
May 3, 2002 / Notices

[[Page 27484]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47185-47188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: R6-6727]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 06-44]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification; Republication

    Editorial Note: FR Doc. 06-6727 was originally published at page 
44634 in the issue of Monday, August 7, 2006. In that publication a 
graphic was improperly substituted. The corrected document is 
republished below in its entirety.

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 06-44 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: August 1, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D

[[Page 47186]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16AU06.000


[[Page 47187]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16AU06.001


[[Page 47188]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16AU06.002


    Editorial Note: FR Doc. 06-6727 was originally published at page 
44634 in the issue of Monday, August 7, 2006. In that publication a 
graphic was improperly substituted. The corrected document is 
republished in its entirety.

[FR Doc. R6-6727 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-C
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006,                fully                complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of River Hawk Aviation,                Inc.                (formerly Viva International,                Inc.). |

**RIVER      HAWK AVIATION, INC.**

**(FORMERLY      VIVA INTERNATIONAL, INC.)**

| /s/                *Calvin                Humphrey*Calvin                HumphreyChief                Executive Officer |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. 19-22021-RAM

ANIBAL BALBONA CHAPTER 13

MAGGIE BALBONA

Debtors,

________________________________/

ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM 5-1, DE # 25

THIS CAUSE having come before the court on January 14, 2020, upon the Debtors 

ANIBAL BALBONA and MAGGIE BALBONA’s Objection to Claim Number #5-1, (D.E. #25),

no opposition being heard, this Court having considered the basis for the objection and being 

otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is 

ORDERED that Debtor’s objection to the claim is hereby SUSTAINED.

Claim #5-1 of VT INC., AS TRUSTEE OF WORLD OMNI LT is hereby disallowed and 

stricken. The Creditor will not receive any distribution from the Trustee.

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 15, 2020.

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-22021-RAM Doc 31 Filed 01/16/20 Page 1 of 2
Submitted by:

RICARDO CORONA, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 111333

3899 NW 7 Street

Second Floor

Miami, FL 33126

(305) 547-1234 Phone

The party submitting the order shall serve a copy of the signed order on all required parties and 

file with the court a certificate of service conforming with Local Rule 2002-1(F).

Case 19-22021-RAM Doc 31 Filed 01/16/20 Page 2 of 2
October 1 0, 2 01 2 Dear 

### Mr
. Danie ls on, After c o ns ul tin g w ith three different contractors , I was told b y eac h that my present furn ac e whic h i s in need of exten s i v e repai rs , might l as t anywhere from several months 

### to two o r thre e years. It was als o exp lain e d to me that by n ext May 

### I would be re q uire d to in s tall a high-energy e ffi cient furn ace . B e c au se of the configura t ion of my h om e to do s o woul d require co n s ide rabl e , costly and unsightl y renovations
. T h i s le ft me wi th a c ho ice o f putting in an 80% efficient furnace n o w , when the f urn ace mi ght last another two or thre e ye ar s, or s pending almo s t double that amo unt later if 

### J 

### ne ed a new one. It i s m y un d erstanding that contractors 

### migh t be able t o get waivers. However , 

### I feel like the l a dy 

### in an article I rece ntly re ad. (What about thi s

### old**s** house that makes 

### it imprac tical to install the PV C venting required for the 90-plu s percent furnac e s. Let ' s do a waiver in those situations. Ho w do I get a waiver when it is 10 p .m. at night and gra ndma is freezin g ?) An d y es, I am a grandma What about getting these waiver s now and having them on hand to use when needed? 

### I w o uld app reciate your thoughts on how 

### I should handle this situation. Sincere ly , Mary R oyc e 3 7 6 M e d in a Dr
. St. Loui s , Mo
. 63122 3 14-96 5

- 2 89 7 m.royc e@s bcglo b aJ.net
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20

- 0053

_________________ A & A CONSTRUCTION, INC. ,

Plaintiff

-Appellant,
v. ATLANTIC CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ,

Defendant

-Appellee O R D E R

_________

________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing Appellant A & A Construction, Inc.’s opening brief filed electronically on April 7 , 2020 , this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the Rule s and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 11(6)(b)(iii) requires the cover page to include the name, the venue of the tribunal, and the judge in which the case originated or from which an appeal is taken. A ppellant’s brief includes the name and venue of the tribunal from which this appeal is taken but not the name of the presiding judge. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(d) requires a “statement of the facts relevant to the issues presented for review, with references to the pages or the parts of the record at which material facts appear. ” Appellant ’ s brief includes a discussion of the facts, but the statement of facts does not contain appropriate references to the record. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the Appellant shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified R ule s , and the A

ppellant shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions , or deletions other than 04/08/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0053those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to all parties of record. DATED this _____ day of April, 2020. For the Court
By_________________________

Justice

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 8 2020