alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
05/08/2012 15:35 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

Addison Jet Management, Inc. 

dlbta Trinity tf.ivate ,Jet Charter 

May6,2012 

Federal A viatjon Administration 

600 Independence A venue. S. W. 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

RE: IN the Addison Jet Management. Inc. 

FAA Case No. 2011SW910053 

Dear Madam: 

+ OMS @001/002 

~~ECEIVED 

f\4Q~ -a .. • HEA~ING DOCKET 

I 

C.Q 

+: 

Pursuant to Title 14 CFR § 13.209(a). I am submitting this written answer to the Complaint flied by the 

FAA in the above referenced matter. 

L 

The proposed civil penalty in the amount of $8149 is excessive for the admini!;tration error found in an 

audit conducted by the Drug Abatement office. 

IL 

1. Admits to this Statement. 

2. Admits to this Statement 

3. Admits to this statement. 

4. This statem~nt is incorrect Addison Jet Management. Inc. did obtain drug and alcohol record checks 

from DOT-reglllated employers who had employed Ms. McKown during any period during the two 

years before the date of Ms. McKown's application to Addison Jet Management, Inc. 

5. Admits to this Statement. 

7515lemmon Ave. 

Dallas, Texas 75209 

I 

gshow@trinityjet.com 

Phone: :214-366-4SOO 

Cell: 214-649-5474 

Fax 214-366-4R01 
05/08/2012 15:35 FAX 2024835142 FAA @ 002/002 

I 

m_ 

1 _ This Statement is incorrect. Ms. McKown was subject to a drug and alcohol records check of 

employers who had employed her during the two years before her date of application to Addison Jet 

Management, Inc_ 

2. The civil penalty of$8149 is not appropriate. 

We respectfully request that the Administrdtive Law Judge enter an order that Addison Jet Management 

be assessed an Administrative Action in lieu of the civil penalty of$8149_ 

Gerald P. Shaw 

Director ofOperations, 

Addison Jet Management, Inc. 

214-649-5474 

cc: Autumn Killingham, Complainant's CoWlsel 

cc: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin. Administrative Law Judge 

7515lemmon Ave_ 

Dallas, Texas 75209 gshaw@trinityjet.com 

Phone: 214-366-4800 

Cell: 214-957-0166 

Fax 214-366-4801
Written Description of Provident Financial Services, Inc.'s Cash Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Written Description of Provident Financial Services, Inc.’s 
 2012
Annual Cash Incentive Plan 
 2012 Cash Incentive Compensation. On January 26, 2012, the Board of Directors of
Provident Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”), on the recommendation of its Compensation Committee, approved an annual performance-based incentive program for the payment of incentive cash compensation to certain officers and
employees of The Provident Bank, the Company’s wholly owned savings bank subsidiary, including senior executive officers. Cash incentive payments will be based primarily on the Company’s 2012 financial performance compared with certain
targets (the “Corporate Targets”). Incentive payments based on the Company’s 2012 financial performance may be made if the Company meets or exceeds 95% of any of the Corporate Targets (“Threshold”). 

For senior executive officers (including the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer), 100% of
the incentive payment that may be made will be based on the Company’s 2012 financial performance using the following Corporate Targets that relate to the Company’s business plan and strategic objectives: (i) earnings per share
(weighted 25%); (ii) net income (weighted 25%); (iii) efficiency ratio (weighted 25%); and (iv) return on average assets (weighted 25%). 
 For other officers and employees eligible to participate, a portion of the incentive payment that may be made will be based on the Company’s 2012 performance using the same Corporate Targets. A
portion of the incentive payment will also be based on individual performance against personal goals and objectives, and may be paid whether or not Corporate Targets have been met. 

Incentive payments will be a percentage of the employee’s base salary. Using estimated 2012 base salary levels and the current
number of employees that could participate (591 persons), the total cash incentive payments that may be made for 2012 would range from approximately $3.4 million at the Threshold level up to $11.8 million at the Maximum level.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

AR IEON GASQUE , A ppellant ,

v. Case No s

. 5D 22-2 130 5D22-2138 LT Cas e No s

. 2022 -D R -0 01604

2022- DR

- 001663 D ANNY KISWANI , A ppellee

. ____________________________/

D ecision filed August 1, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court f or Seminole County, Michael J. Rudisill , Judge.

Arieon Gasque , Orlando , pro se. Mark A. Skipper, of Law Office of Mark A. Skipper, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A FFIRMED.

SOU D , KILBANE and PRATT , JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of SaVi Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Phillip
      C. Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to SaVi Media Group, Inc. and will be retained by SaVi Media Group,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                Novermber 19, 2007
            By:
                */s/ PHILLIP C. SCOTT*Phillip
                C. ScottChief
                Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mars Global Digital Dune Database (MGD3): Global dune distribution and wind pattern observations      

      January 16, 2013    

The Mars Global Digital Dune Database (MGD3) is complete and now extends from 90°N to 90°S latitude. The recently released south pole (SP) portion (MC-30) of MGD3 adds ∼60,000 km2 of medium to large-size dark dune fields and ∼15,000 km2 of sand deposits and smaller dune fields to the previously released equatorial (EQ, ∼70,000 km2), and north pole (NP, ∼845,000 km2) portions of the database, bringing the global total to ∼975,000 km2. Nearly all NP dunes are part of large sand seas, while the majority of EQ and SP dune fields are individual dune fields located in craters. Despite the differences between Mars and Earth, their dune and dune field morphologies are strikingly similar. Bullseye dune fields, named for their concentric ring pattern, are the exception, possibly owing their distinctive appearance to winds that are unique to the crater environment. Ground-based wind directions are derived from slipface (SF) orientation and dune centroid azimuth (DCA), a measure of the relative location of a dune field inside a crater. SF and DCA often preserve evidence of different wind directions, suggesting the importance of local, topographically influenced winds. In general however, ground-based wind directions are broadly consistent with expected global patterns, such as polar easterlies. Intriguingly, between 40°S and 80°S latitude both SF and DCA preserve their strongest, though different, dominant wind direction, with transport toward the west and east for SF-derived winds and toward the north and west for DCA-derived winds.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

## Related Content

#### Timothy Neal Titus, Ph.D.

##### Research Space Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

ttitus@usgs.gov

928-556-7201

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014
##### 



U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM
40-F/A
 AMENDMENT NO.
1
 o
    
    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2005
    
    Commission File Number: 1-31253
 PENGROWTH ENERGY TRUST
  Alberta, Canada
 1311
    
    None(Primary Standard Industrial
    
    (I.R.S. EmployerClassification Code Number)
    
    Identification Number)
 Suite 2900,
240  4th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta Canada T2P 4H4
(403) 233-0224
 Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
2300 First City Tower, 1001 Fannin
Houston, Texas 77002-6760
(713) 758-2222
 Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
 Title
of each class
    

Name
of each exchange on which registeredTrust Units
    
    New York Stock Exchange
 Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
 None  (Title of Class)
 Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
 None  (Title of Class)
  þ     Annual information form
    
    þ     Audited annual financial statements
    Yes     o
    
    No     þ
  Yes     þ
    
    No     o




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
   DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT
  Appendix
    
    DocumentsA*
    
    Pengrowth Energy Trust Annual Information Form for the year ended
December 31, 2005.B*
    
    Managements Discussion and Analysis (included on pages 54
through 80 of the Pengrowth Energy Trust 2005 Annual Report).C*
    
    Consolidated Financial Statements of Pengrowth Energy Trust,
including note 20 thereof which includes a reconciliation of the
Consolidated Financial Statements to United States generally
accepted accounting principles.D*
    
    Five Year Review  Pengrowth Energy Trust Consolidated Financial
Results (included on pages 115 through 119 of the Pengrowth
Energy Trust 2005 Annual Report).E*
    
    Corporate Governance (included on pages 48 through 53 of the
Pengrowth Energy Trust 2005 Annual Report).F*
    
    Oil and Gas Producing Activities Prepared in Accordance with SFAS
No. 69  Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities.G
    

Auditors
Report.
  - 2 -




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Date: August 2, 2006
    PENGROWTH ENERGY TRUST
by its Administrator
PENGROWTH CORPORATIONBy:

/s/  James S. KinnearJames S. KinnearChairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



APPENDIX G
 Auditors Report
 TO THE UNITHOLDERS OF PENGROWTH ENERGY TRUST
     
  82
PENGROWTH ENERGY TRUST
3/$,17,))
6

75,$/(;+,%,7

T-82

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 6 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 7 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 8 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 9 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 10 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 11 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 12 of 13
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-14 Filed 10/22/20 Page 13 of 13
Otis Lamar WELCH, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D17-2672

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018

Otis Lamar Welch, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.
Exhibit 99.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Optio Software, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Warren K. Neuburger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





| | (1). |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 

| | (2). |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date: December 13, 2002

By:

/s/    WARREN K. NEUBURGERWarren K. Neuburger Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson                
|                      |  | Rodger L. Johnson                    
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3175

___________________________

Wesley Eugene Brooks

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Tom Roy; David Crist; Terry Carlson; Nanette Larson; Bruce Reisner; Douglas

Panser; James Schaffer; Jane Does 1-10; John Does 1-10

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: November 19, 2013

 Filed: February 26, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, MELLOY and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Wesley Brooks brought suit in the District of Minnesota, alleging that the New

Dimensions chemical-dependency treatment program at the Minnesota Correctional

Facility in Faribault, Minnesota, substantially burdened his ability to exercise his

religious beliefs in violation of the First Amendment. In addition, Brooks alleged

violations of the following laws: 42 U.S.C. § 1983; Section 3 of the Religious Land
Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1; the American

Indian Religious Freedom Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1996; and article I, section 16 of the

Minnesota Constitution. Brooks requested a preliminary injunction to reinstate him

to the New Dimensions program pending resolution of his lawsuit. The district court

denied his request, and Brooks appealed to this court.

While that appeal was pending, on January, 14, 2014, the district court

dismissed Brooks's underlying case with prejudice, finding that Brooks had failed to

exhaust his available administrative remedies. Brooks v. Roy, No. 12-CV-316, 2014

WL 127024, at *4–6 (D. Minn. Jan. 14, 2014). Because the underlying suit has been

dismissed, this court can no longer grant Brooks the relief he seeks. See Burns v. City

of Apple Valley, 30 F. App'x 670, 670 (8th Cir. 2002) (unpublished) ("[A]n

interlocutory appeal from the denial of preliminary injunctive relief becomes moot

once final judgment is entered."); see also Activision TV, Inc. v. Pinnacle Bancorp,

Inc., No. 8:13-CV-215, 2013 WL 5963142, at *2 (D. Neb. Nov. 7, 2013) ("[A]n

appeal from an order regarding an injunction does not stay other proceedings before

the district court and does not prevent the district court from deciding the litigation on

its merits[.]" (internal citation omitted)). The appeal is now moot. We therefore grant

appellees' motion to dismiss.

We note that Brooks has filed an appeal of the district court's judgment

dismissing his case. In the event that judgment is reversed, Brooks will be free to

renew his motion for a preliminary injunction.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Optio Software, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Wayne Cape, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 15, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ C. Wayne Cape      
|                        |  |     |  | C. Wayne Cape          
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the quarterly report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed to be a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT        99.7**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18        U.S.C. §1350,

AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In        connection with the Annual Report of Exeter Resource Corporation (the        “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,        Cecil Bond, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.        §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,        that:

(1)        The Report fully complies        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;        and

(2)        The information contained        in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and        results of operations of the Company.

         

| March 31, 2008 |   | By: |   | /s/ Cecil Bond 

Cecil BondChief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
|----------------|--------|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Exeter        Resource Corporation and will be retained by Exeter Resource Corporation and furnished to        the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Jerry Neil ALFRED, Appellant, v. John A. BARFIELD, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 9, 2018

Jerry Neil Alfred, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re: CASE NO.: 19-24331-PDR

Ralph Levi Sanders, Jr.,

CHAPTER 13

 Debtor.

 /

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the pro se Debtor’s Ex Parte Motion 

to Continue Hearing (the “Motion”) (Doc. 104). After reviewing the Motion, the case file, and 

finding good cause, it is ORDERED that the hearing on the Motion is Continued to be 

heard on May 3, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. by telephone through Court Solutions, the 

Court’s telephonic service provider. Appearances through Court Solutions may be 

arranged at www.court-solutions.com/SignUp not later than 3:00 p.m. the business 

day prior to the hearing. If you are unable to register online, you may register by 

telephone at (917) 746-7476.

Peter D. Russin, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 1, 2021.

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 105 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 2
2

###

Copies Furnished To:

Debtor

Counsel for Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

Chapter 13 Trustee

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 105 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 2