alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 20005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9829]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Actuarial Advisory Committee With Respect to the Notice of Public 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Public Law 92-463 that 
the Actuarial Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on May 27, 2009, 
at 9:30 a.m. at the office of the Chief Actuary of the U.S. Railroad 
Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, on the 
conduct of the 24th Actuarial Valuation of the Railroad Retirement 
System. The agenda for this meeting will include a discussion of the 
results and presentation of the 24th Actuarial Valuation. The text and 
tables which constitute the Valuation will have been prepared in draft 
form for review by the Committee. It is expected that this will be the 
last meeting of the Committee before publication of the Valuation.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Persons wishing to submit 
written statements or make oral presentations should address their 
communications or notices to the RRB Actuarial Advisory Committee, do 
Chief Actuary, U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092.

    Dated: April 23, 2009.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-9829 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Bruce D. Herman    
|                       |  |  |  | Bruce D. Herman        
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1
                                                                    ------------


                        ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

This Amendment dated March 5, 2008 to the Administrative Services Agreement (the
"Agreement") originally dated August 1, 2004 by and between iVoice, Inc., a New
Jersey corporation ("iVoice") and iVoice Technology, Inc., a New Jersey
corporation (the "Company").

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to amend this Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the respective
promises and agreements of the parties set forth herein, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

    1.   Effective on September 1, 2005, the Services Fee shall be revised to
         equal Four Thousand and Two Hundred and Twenty Dollars and Ninety-six
         Cents ($4,220.96).
    2.   The Services Fees as defined in Section 3 of this Agreement and that
         are earned, accrued and remain unpaid shall be aggregated and converted
         into a Convertible Promissory Note in substantially the form as set
         forth in Exhibit A herein.
    3.   All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
         force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed
as of date written below:


IVOICE, INC.                                 IVOICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.


By: ___________________                      By: ___________________
    Jerome Mahoney                               Jerome Mahoney
    President and                                President and
    Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has deter mined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31016 Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BRYANT WASHINGTON, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CR-58)

______________________________________________

August 29, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Bryant Washington, Sr., appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction to conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute. He argues that the seizure of his property after his criminal2

conviction constitutes a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Washington’s property was forfeited pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853 and as a result of the criminal proceeding that also resulted in his conviction. The Double Jeopardy Clause did not preclude the Government from seeking the full range of statutorily authorized criminal penalties in the same proceeding because the total punishment did not exceed that authorized by law. United States

v. Halper , 490 U.S. 435, 450 (1989).

AFFIRMED.
exv4w50



 






Exhibit
4.50




CONFIDENTIAL






Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited

Gusu Industrial Estate,

Xixiang, Baoan,

Shenzhen, PRC                                              
                                                                                
                               02January2008





	Attn: 	 	Mr. John Farina;

Ms. Connie Sit;

Mr. Gawain Chan;





Dear Sir and Madam,




Ref: BANKING FACILITY



We refer to our facility letter dated 7 June 2007 (the “Facility Letter”) and are pleased to
advise that the Facility Letter shall be amended as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Borrower

	 	:
	 	Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited


	 
	 	 	 	 
	Lender:

	 	:
	 	HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited, Shenzhen Branch.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Security

	 	:
	 	Previous:

Corporate Guarantee for USD10,000,000.- from Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.,
supported by board resolution.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	New:

Corporate Guarantee for USD10,000,000.- from Nam Tai Electronic &
Electrical Products Limited to be supported by board resolution.





All other terms and conditions stipulated in our Facility Letter of 7 June 2007 remain unchanged.



In all other respects, the Facility Letter shall remain in full force and effect, including our
right to review those facilities, withdraw and demand for repayment at any time.



Please confirm your agreement by arranging for the duplicate of this letter to be signed and
returned to the Bank at the above address on or before 02 February 2008.




1









 







We are pleased to be of continued assistance.




Yours sincerely,




	 	 	 
	For and on behalf of

	 	Accepted by
	HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited

	 	Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen)
	Shenzhen Branch

	 	Company Limited
	 

	 	






	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	           [Chop in Chinese]	 	 
	/s/ Fay Zhou
 


	 	/s/ [signature illegible]
 

	 	 
	Faye Zhou

	 	Authorised Signature(s) & Chop	 	 
	Vice President

	 	Date:	 	 
	Commercial Banking
	 	 	 	 






	 	 	 
	Barry Yiu
 


	 	 
	Barry Yiu
	 	 
	Senior Vice President
	 	 
	Commercial Banking
	 	 







2
**Exhibit 12**RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES. We have calculated Bottling LLC’s ratio of earnings to fixedcharges in the following table by dividing earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings are before taxes, minorityinterest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest) and lossesrecognized from equity investments, reduced by undistributed income from equity investments. Fixed charges include interest expense,capitalized interest and one-third of net rent which is the portion of the rent deemed representative of the interest factor.**Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**($ in millions)                               **Fiscal Year**      **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003**  **2002** **Net income before taxes, minority interest andcumulative effect of change inaccounting principle** $925  $896  $832  $811  $792                      Undistributed (income) loss from equityinvestments  2   —   (1)  (1)  — Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest $260  $217  $191  $200   152                 **Earnings as adjusted** $1,187  $1,113  $1,022  $1,010  $944                                      **Fixed charges:**                    Interest expense $227  $187  $166  $177  $131 Capitalized interest  —   —   —   —   — Interest portion of rental expense  33   30   25   23   21                                      **Total fixed charges** $260  $217  $191  $200  $152                                      **Ratio of earnings to fixed charges**  4.57   5.13   5.35   5.05   6.21
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2160

_____________________________
J. D

. H UFFMAN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Michael C. Overstreet , Judge

. October 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 J.D. Huffman
, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LOUIS H. WALKER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4694 ) U.S. BANK NATIONAL ) ASSOCIATION as TRUSTEE ) FOR STRUCTURED ASSET ) SECURITES CORPORATION ) MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST ) 2007-BNC1 MORTGAGE ) PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, ) SERIES 2007-BNC1, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 1, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Jay B. Rosman, Judge. Louis H. Walker, pro se. W. Bard Brockman of Bryan Cave LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Frier v. Frier, 13 So. 3d 145, 146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the trial court's order did not make a determination as to personal jurisdiction).- 2 - Dismissed.

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3111 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cobaltate(1-), bis[4-(hydroxy-k O)-3- 

[2-[2-(hydroxy-k O)-1-naphthalenyl] diazenyl-k 

N1]benzenesulfonamidato(2-)]-, sodium (1:1). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cobaltate(1-), bis[4- 

(hydroxy-k O)-3-[2-[2-(hydroxy-k O)-1-naphthalenyl] 

diazenyl-k N1]benzenesulfonamidato(2-)]-, sodium (1:1). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COBALTATE(1-), BIS[4-(HYDROXY-KO)-3-[2-[2-(HY4 DROXY-KO)-1-NAPHTHALENYL] DIAZENYL5 KN1]BENZENESULFONAMIDATO(2-)]-, SODIUM 

6 (1:1). 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3111 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Cobaltate(1-), bis[4-(hydroxykO)-3-[2-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-1- 

naphthalenyl]diazenylkN1]benzenesulfonamidato(2- 

)]-, sodium (1:1) (CAS No. 

58302–43–5) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.12.45) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### THE 

### ATJXDWNEY GENERAL
, ., .., ’ OF ??l-CXAS
AUSITBN. **rIExAm 78711**  A-mI(IIIy O-AI. June 3, 1976

The Honorable Henry Rothell Administrator Opinion **NO.** 8-332 Texas EmploymentCommission Austin, Texas 78770 Re: Limitationon Dolitical activitiesof employees of the Texar Employment Commission. Dear Mr. Rothell: You have requested our opinion regarding the statutory limitationon certain political activitiesof employees of the Texas Employment Commission. Article 5221b:9(d) provides, in pertinentpart:

The Commission shall not employ or pay any person who is an officer or committee member **of** any politicalparty organisation. In light of this provision,you ask whether an employee of the Commissionmay serve as chairman or other officer of a politicalprecinct or as a delegate to a county, state or national party convention. In our opinion, it is evident that,.a Commission employee may.not-serve

as a precinct officer. Article 13.34(c) of the Texas Election Code makes clear that a precinct chairman is an "officer
. . . of [a] politicalparty organization." A conventiondelegate, however, occupjcs a somewhat different statusfrom that of an “officer. ” A "delegate" is defined in common usage as "a person sent and empowered to act **for** another

**. .**  **.** as a representative to a convention or conference (as of a political party)." Webster's 38 International

Dictionary (1961). Article 13.34(c) of the Election Code prescribes the qualificationsfor serving as a delegator

**p. 35412** The HonorableHenry Rothell - page 2 (H-832)

The only qualificationsfor servingas a delegate to a county or senatorial district convention,or to a state convention,are that the person be a qualified voter residing within the territorywhich he is selectedto represent and shall be affiliated with the party as prescribed in section 179a of this Code. See also art. 13.34(h). Furthermore,no part of the mc= Code even implies that a delegatenecessarilyoccupies the status of "officer." As to persons nominated as delegates to a national convention,the Election Code provides that they
are those persons nominatedby the

delegate selection committeesof the presidentialcandidateswho qualify to participate in the presidential primary in accordancewith Subdivision 3 of this section, and are pledged to the presidentialcandidateon whose behalf they are nominated. Art. 13.5&a, subdivision2(b). It is thereforeour opinion that a delegate to a county, state or nationalparty convention is not, by virtue of his status as a delegate,an Hofficer or committeemember of [al pclitical party organization." Accordingly, an employee of the Texas EmploymentConxnission is not disqualified from serving as such a delegate. '~~. SUMMARY An employee **of** the Texas Employment Commissionmay not serve as chairman or other officer of a politicalprecinct, but may serve as a delegate to a county, state or national party convention.

Attorney General **of** TexasThe Eoaorable Xenry Rothell - page 3 (H-832)

Opinion Committee jwb

p.3514
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 1 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 2 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 3 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 4 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 5 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 6 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 7 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 8 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 9 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 10 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 11 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 12 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 13 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 14 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 15 of 16
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 80 Filed 11/11/19 Page 16 of 16
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of World Logistics, LLC 

d/b/a Viabox 

Docket No. FAA-2105-0207 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

COMPLAINANT'S SHOW CAUSE STATEMENT 

On January 21,2016, an "Order Setting Show Cause Deadline Re Dismissal" was 

received by the Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration. For the reasons stated below, the 

Complainant respectfully requests that the Complaint in this matter not be dismissed with 

prejudice. 

The attorney of record in this case is currently on maternity leave and the case was given 

to the undersigned for handling in her absence until her return in mid-February. Since the 

undersigned has taken over the case, he has engaged in ongoing settlement talks with the 

Respondent's counsel, Mr. David Hernandez. Such communication includes emails dated 

December 16, 2015, December 18, 2015, January 12, 2016, and January 21, 2016. Inadvertently, 

the undersigned missed the dates that were scheduled to discuss the status of the case. 

The Complainant would like to reschedule the Pre-Hearing Status Conference in order to 

allow the Judge to learn of the progress that the parties are making towards settling this matter. 

Dismissing this Complaint would not be in the interest of aviation safety, as the shipping of 

undeclared hazardous materials is an important issue that can have grave consequences. 

WHEREFORE, the Complainant respectfully requests that the Complaint in this matter 

not ~d with prejudice. 

Brian K. Khan, Esq. 

Enforcement Division, Midwest Team 

FAA Office of the Chief Counsel 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, Illinois 60018 

email: brian.k.khan@faa.gov 

Telephone: (847) 294-7313 (main) 

(847) 294-7652 (direct) 

(847) 294-7498 (fax) 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have, this date, served the foregoing COMPLAINANT'S SHOW CAUSE 

STATEMENT to the following address as indicated: 

One Copy: 

Mr. David Hernandez, Esq. 

Vedder, Price, P.C. 

1401 "I" Street, N.W., Suite 1100 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Fax: 202-312-3322 

One Copy: 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

Original and One Copy: 

via Fax 

via Fax 

Federal Aviation Administration via US Mail 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 

Dated this 21st day of January, 2016 

Fn e era v1atwn Ad mnnstratton .
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Defense Intelligence College.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of Public Law 92-463, as amended by section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the Defense Intelligence Agency National Defense Intelligence College Board of Visitors has been scheduled as follows:

# DATES:

Tuesday, June 2, 2009 (8 a.m. to 5 p.m.) and Wednesday, June 3, 2009 (8 a.m. to 12 p.m.).

# ADDRESSES:

National Defense Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. A. Denis Clift, President, DIA National Defense Intelligence College, Washington, DC 20340-5100 (202/231-3344).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The entire meeting is devoted to the discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(1), Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed. The Board will discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, as to the successful accomplishment of the mission assigned to the National Defense Intelligence College.

Dated: April 24, 2009.

Morgan E. Frazier,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E9-9913 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Landsat Next              

      March 11, 2024    

View Report

Version History

Landsat Next's launch in the early 2030s will ensure continuity of the longest space-based record of Earth’s land surfaces. The mission will substantially increase the breadth and quality of Earth observation data available to scientists, land managers, and others responsible for managing Earth's natural resources. Landsat Next’s constellation of three satellites will carry sensors that improve both the spatial and temporal resolution, as well as introducing new spectral bands capable of enabling new science applications to further study water quality, crop production, plant stress, climate, snow dynamics, soil health, and other essential environmental variables.

Building upon the 52-year record of multispectral imagery, Landsat Next will provide global, synoptic, and repetitive coverage of Earth’s land surfaces. It will continue delivering gold-standard data at a scale that allows for the detection, differentiation, characterization, and monitoring of both natural and human-induced changes over time.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Multimedia           

March 19, 2024

####   Landsat Next Satellites Circling the Earth

Visit the Landsat Next webpage for more information on the planned 2030 mission. 

Landsat Missions, Landsat Missions

## Related Content

                  - Multimedia  March 19, 2024  Landsat Next Satellites Circling the Earth
Visit the Landsat Next webpage for more information on the planned 2030 mission. 
ByLandsat Missions, Landsat Missions 

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - Science Technology
                  - Landsat Next
                  - Landsat Legacy

View All **