19588 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Notices 

acceptable audited financial 

statement(s) and supplementary reports 

through LASS; 

69. Trendstar Mortgage, LLC, Camp 

Springs, MD [Docket No. 09–9149– 

MR]—Failed to submit an acceptable 

audited financial statement(s) and 

supplementary reports through LASS; 

70. United Capital, Inc., Knoxville, TN 

[Docket No. 09–9151–MR]—Failed to 

submit the annual recertification fee; 

and the Executed Yearly Verification 

Report; and 

71. Virgin Islands Community Bank, 

Christiansted, VI [Docket No. 09–9287– 

MR]—Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; and the Executed 

Yearly Verification Report. 

B. Board Letter Issued January 16, 2009 

1. Lakeview Mortgage Corporation, 

Chicago, IL [Docket No. 09–9317–MR]— 

Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; the Executed Yearly 

Verification Report; and an acceptable 

audited financial statement(s) and 

supplementary reports through LASS. 

III. Lenders Who Failed To Meet 

Requirements for Annual 

Recertification of HUD/FHA Approval 

Action: The Board issued a letter to 

each of the lenders listed below 

withdrawing their FHA approval for one 

year. 

Cause: The Board took this action 

based on the following violations of 

HUD/FHA requirements in which: 

A. Board Letters Issued January 9, 2009 

1. Balboa Reinsurance Company, Simi 

Valley, CA [Docket No. 09–9219–MR]— 

Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; and the Executed 

Title II Yearly Verification Report; 

2. Bank Reale, Pasco, WA [Docket No. 

09–9213–MR]—Failed to submit the 

annual recertification fee; and the 

Executed Title II Yearly Verification 

Report; 

3. Common Cents Mortgage, Inc. 

[Docket No. 09–9036–MR]—Failed to 

submit the annual recertification fee; 

and the Executed Title II Yearly 

Verification Report; 

4. Cooperative De Ahorro Y Credito 

Caribe, Guayanilla, PR [Docket No. 09– 

9085–MR]—Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; and the Executed 

Title II Yearly Verification Report; 

5. First State Bank & Trust, 

Caruthersville, MO [Docket No. 09– 

9159–MR]—Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; and the Executed 

Title II Yearly Verification Report; 

6. Harper & Associates, Inc., Cabot, 

AR [Docket No. 09–9014–MR]—Failed to 

submit an acceptable audited financial 

statement(s) and supplementary reports 

through LASS; 

7. Infinity Lending Group, Tustin, CA 

[Docket No. 09–9220–MR]—Failed to 

submit the annual recertification fee; 

and the Executed Title II Yearly 

Verification Report; 

8. Key Mortgage Corporation, Coeur D 

Alene, ID [Docket No. 09–9051–MR]— 

Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; the Executed Title II 

Yearly Verification Report; and an 

acceptable audited financial 

statement(s) and supplementary reports 

through LASS; 

9. Level 1 Mortgage, LLC, Littleton, CO 

[Docket No. 09–9011–MR]—Failed to 

submit the annual recertification fee; the 

Executed Title Yearly Verification 

Report and an acceptable audited 

financial statement(s) and 

supplementary reports through LASS; 

10. Paramount Residential Mortgage 

Group, Inc., Corona, CA [Docket No. 09– 

9043–MR]—Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; and the Executed 

Title II Yearly Verification Report; 

11. New Horizon RE, Inc. dba JL 

Mortgage, Columbia, SC [Docket No. 09– 

9009–MR]—Failed to submit an 

acceptable audited financial 

statement(s) and supplementary reports 

through LASS; 

12. San Diego Loans, dba 

SDLoans.com, San Diego, CA [Docket 

No. 09–9022–MR]—Failed to submit the 

annual recertification fee; the executed 

Yearly Verification Report; and an 

acceptable audited financial 

statement(s) and supplementary reports 

through LASS; 

13. Sun National Bank, Vineland, NJ 

[Docket No. 09–9091–MR]—Failed to 

submit the annual recertification fee; 

and the Executed Yearly Verification 

Report; 

14. The Bank of Fayetteville, 

Fayetteville, AR [Docket No. 9246– 

MR]—Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; and the Executed 

Title II Yearly Verification Report; 

15. The Residential Mortgage Group, 

Inc., Wakefield, MA [Docket No. 09– 

9152–MR]—Failed to submit an 

acceptable audited financial 

statement(s) and supplementary reports 

through LASS; 

16. TLP Funding, Calabasa, CA 

[Docket No. 09–9228–MR]—Failed to 

submit an acceptable audited financial 

statement(s) and supplementary reports 

through LASS; 

17. Viva Advisor Group, Inc., 

Cincinnati, OH [Docket No. 09–9202– 

MR]—Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee; the Executed Yearly 

Verification Report; and an acceptable 

audited financial statement(s) and 

supplementary reports through LASS; 

and 

18. West Union Bank, West Union, 

WV [Docket No. 09–9064–MR]—Failed 

to submit the annual recertification fee; 

and the Executed Yearly Verification 

Report. 

B. Board Letters Issued January 16, 2009 

Action: The Board issued a letter to 

each of the lenders listed below 

withdrawing their HUD/FHA approval 

for one year. 

Cause: The Board took this action 

based on the following violations of 

HUD/FHA requirements in which: 

1. B & T Mortgage, Inc, Glendale, AZ 

[Docket No. 09–9211–MR]—Failed to 

submit the annual recertification fee; 

and the Executed Yearly Verification 

Report; 

2. Citibank NA, New York, NY 

[Docket No. 09–9294–MR]—Failed to 

submit the annual recertification fee; 

and the Executed Yearly Verification 

Report; 

3. Corstar Financial, Inc., Phoenix, AZ 

[Docket No. 09–9386–MR]—Failed to 

submit an acceptable audited financial 

statement(s) and supplementary reports 

through LASS; 

4. EAI Financial Group, Inc., 

Plymouth, MA [Docket No. 09–9331– 

MR]—Failed to submit the Statement on 

Auditing Standards 29 opinion on the 

Financial Data Template; and the type 

of audit opinion issued was a qualified 

opinion: scope limitation—imposed by 

management; 

5. Eastern Financial Home Loans, 

Corporation, Hialeah, FL [Docket No. 

09–9279–MR]— Failed to submit the 

annual recertification fee, and the 

Executed Yearly Verification Report; 

and 

6. First National Bank Pine City, Pine 

City, MN [Docket No. 09–9235–MR]— 

Failed to submit the annual 

recertification fee, and the Executed 

Yearly Verification Report. 

Dated: April 3, 2009. 

Brian D. Montgomery, 

Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal 

Housing Commissioner. 

[FR Doc. E9–9731 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R6–ES–2009–N0080; 60120–1113– 

0000–D2] 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Permits 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Notices 19589 

ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications 

for permits. 

SUMMARY: We announce our receipt of 

applications to conduct certain 

activities pertaining to enhancement of 

survival of endangered species. The 

Endangered Species Act requires that 

we invite public comment on these 

permit applications. 

DATES: Written comments on this 

request for a permit must be received by 

May 29, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit written data or 

comments to the Assistant Regional 

Director-Ecological Services, U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, 

Denver Federal Center, Denver, 

Colorado 80225–0486; facsimile 303– 

236–0027. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Availability of Comments 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal indentifying information in 

your comment, you should be aware 

that your entire comment—including 

your personal identifying information— 

may be made publicly available at any 

time. While you can ask us in your 

comment to withhold your personal 

identifying information from public 

review, we cannot guarantee that we 

will be able to do so. 

Document Availability 

Documents and other information 

submitted with these applications are 

available for review, subject to the 

requirements of the Privacy Act [5 

U.S.C. 552A] and Freedom of 

Information Act [5 U.S.C. 552], by any 

party who submits a request for a copy 

of such documents within 30 days of the 

date of publication of this notice to Kris 

Olsen, by mail (see ADDRESSES) or by 

telephone at 303–236–4256. All 

comments we receive from individuals 

become part of the official public 

record. 

Applications 

The following applicants have 

requested issuance of enhancement of 

survival permits to conduct certain 

activities with endangered species 

pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A) of the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

Applicant: Michael Savage, Savage 

and Savage, Louisville, Colorado, TE– 

051718. The applicant requests a 

renewed permit to take Southwestern 

willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii 

extimus) in conjunction with recovery 

activities throughout the species’ range 

for the purpose of enhancing its survival 

and recovery. 

Applicant: Thomas Ryon, Ottertail 

Environmental, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 

TE–081867. The applicant requests a 

renewed permit to take Southwestern 

willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii 

extimus) in conjunction with recovery 

activities throughout the species’ range 

for the purpose of enhancing its survival 

and recovery. 

Applicant: John Chapo, Lincoln 

Children’s Zoo, Lincoln, Nebraska, TE– 

210754. The applicant requests a permit 

to take Salt Creek tiger beetle (Cicindela 

nevadica lincolniana) in conjunction 

with recovery activities throughout the 

species’ range for the purpose of 

enhancing its survival and recovery. 

Applicant: Dennis Wenger, Frontier 

Corporation, Providence, Utah, TE– 

211051. The applicant requests a permit 

to take Southwestern willow flycatcher 

(Empidonax traillii extimus) in 

conjunction with recovery activities 

throughout the species’ range for the 

purpose of enhancing its survival and 

recovery. 

Dated: April 15, 2009. 

Noreen E. Walsh, 

Deputy Regional Director, Denver, Colorado. 

[FR Doc. E9–9715 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Quarry Visitor Center, Record of 

Decision, Dinosaur National 

Monument, UT 

AGENCY: National Park Service, 

Department of the Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a 

Record of Decision on the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement for the 

Quarry Visitor Center, Dinosaur 

National Monument. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 

U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park 

Service announces the availability of the 

Record of Decision for the Quarry 

Visitor Center, Dinosaur National 

Monument, Utah. On September 2, 

2008, the Regional Director, 

Intermountain Region, approved the 

Record of Decision for the project. As 

soon as practicable, the National Park 

Service will begin to implement the 

Preferred Alternative contained in the 

FEIS issued on March 27, 2008. Five 

alternatives were evaluated in the 

environmental impact statement. These 

include: Alternative A, No Action— 

Continue Current Management; 

Alternative B, the Preferred 

Alternative—Rehabilitate or Replace the 

Exhibit Hall and Construct a New 

Facility Off-Site; Alternative C—Retain 

the Exhibit Hall and Construct a New 

Facility at the Quarry Visitor Center 

Site; Alternative D—Retain the Exhibit 

Hall and Construct Wings Similar to 

Existing Facility; Alternative E— 

Demolish the Entire Facility and 

Construct a New Facility at the Quarry 

Visitor Center Site. 

The Record of Decision includes a 

statement of the decision made, 

synopses of other alternatives 

considered, the basis for the decision, a 

description of the environmentally 

preferable alternative, a finding of no 

impairment of park resources and 

values, a listing of measures to 

minimize environmental harm, and an 

overview of public involvement in the 

decision-making process. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Risser, 4545 E. Highway 40, 

Dinosaur, CO 81610–9724 (970) 374– 

3001, Mary_Risser@nps.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of 

the Record of Decision may be obtained 

from the contact listed above or online 

at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/DINO. 

Dated: March 13, 2009. 

Michael D. Snyder, 

Regional Director, Intermountain Region, 

National Park Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–9787 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–CR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

on Recreational and Subsistence Use 

of ORVs in the Nabesna District of 

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and 

Preserve 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 

SUMMARY: This notice supplements the 

National Park Service (NPS) Notice of 

Intent to Prepare an Environmental 

Impact Statement on Recreational Use of 

Off-Road Vehicles Along Nine Trails in 

the Nabesna Area of Wrangell-St. Elias 

National Park and Preserve published in 

Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 245 on 

Friday, December 21, 2007. The NPS 

intends to expand the scope of the EIS 

to include the use of Off-Road Vehicles 

(ORVs) for subsistence purposes. 

The NPS is preparing an EIS on the 

use of ORVs in the Nabesna area of 

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and 

Preserve. The purpose of the EIS is to 

evaluate a range of alternatives for 

managing recreational and subsistence 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES