alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0067 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0067

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 67/2004 of 15 January 2004 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 as regards the term of validity of export licences in the milk and milk products sector **

*
Official Journal L 010 , 16/01/2004 P. 0013 - 0013 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 67/2004

of 15 January 2004

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 as regards the term of validity of export licences in the milk and milk products sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), and in particular Article 31(14) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999(2) lays down the term of validity of export licences.

(2) The accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the Community on 1 May 2004 will create a new situation on the market in milk products, which will require appropriate measures to be adopted for the management of export refunds.

(3) To enable the new management measures for export refunds to take effect on the date of accession, the term of validity of export licences for milk products for which an application has been lodged up to 31 March 2004 should be limited to 30 April 2004.

(4) A derogation from Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 should therefore be made.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By way of derogation from Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999, the term of validity of export licences with advance fixing of the refund which are applied for up to 31 March 2004 in respect of the products referred to in points (a) to (d) of that Article shall expire on 30 April 2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply to export licences applied for as from the date of its entry into force.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 January 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1787/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 121).

(2) OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2003 (OJ L 287, 5.11.2003, p. 13).
Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to
18 United States Code s. 1350

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Manulife Financial Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 20, 2015



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen B. Roder                                       
|Stephen B. Roder                                           
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Investigation of an earthquake swarm near Trinidad, Colorado, August-October 2001      

      April 1, 2002    

A swarm of 12 widely felt earthquakes occurred between August 28 and September 21, 2001, in the area west of the town of Trinidad, Colorado.  The earthquakes ranged in magnitude between 2.8 and 4.6, and the largest event occurred on September 5, eight days after the initial M 3.4 event.  The nearest permanent seismograph station to the swarm is about 290 km away, resulting in large uncertainties in the location and depth of these events.  To better locate and characterize the earthquakes in this swarm, we deployed a total of 12 portable seismographs in the area of the swarm starting on September 6.  Here we report on data from this portable network that was recorded between September 7 and October 15.  During this time period, we have high-quality data from 39 earthquakes.  The hypocenters of these earthquakes cluster to define a 6 km long northeast-trending fault plane that dips steeply (70-80?) to the southeast.  The upper bound of well-constrained hypocenters is near 3 km depth and lower bound is near 6 km depth.  Preliminary fault mechanisms suggest normal faulting with movement down to the southeast.

Significant historical earthquakes have occurred in the Trinidad region in 1966 and 1973.  Reexamination of felt reports from these earthquakes suggest that the 1973 events may have occurred in the same area, and possibly on the same fault, as the 2001 swarm. 

In recent years, a large volume of excess water that is produced in conjunction with coal-bed methane gas production has been returned to the subsurface in fluid disposal wells in the area of the earthquake swarm.  Because of the proximity of these disposal wells to the earthquakes, local residents and officials are concerned that the fluid disposal might have triggered the earthquakes.  We have evaluated the characteristics of the seismicity using criteria proposed by Davis and Frohlich (1993) as diagnostic of seismicity induced by fluid injection.  We conclude that the characteristics of the seismicity and the fluid disposal process do not constitute strong evidence that the seismicity is induced by the fluid disposal, though they do not rule out this possibility.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado

View All **
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Continental 
Heritage Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 13 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2008 Revision, published July 1, 2008, at 73 FR 37644.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Continental Heritage Insurance Company, 
Columbus, Ohio (NAIC 39551), has redomesticated from the state of Ohio 
to the state of Florida, effective December 22, 2008.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Department Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2008 
revision, to reflect this change.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: April 9, 2009.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. E9-9105 Filed 4-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
FAA Docket Number 2012-0350 

- :""; I: ~ ~ ~ 

I am a pilot with a single-engine land VFR certificate. I earned my certificate in 1980. ' ' '· 

But with a young family I had to put flying on hold until the children were out of collage. 

I have about two hundred hours logged and I have flown about forty hours per year since 

becoming current again. 

During the time I did not hold a airman's medical certificate I had to hold a "DOT' 

medical certificate. In my employment I have to drive truck and operate hydraulic crane. 

At one point when OSHA first had the Certified Crane Operator program they were going 

to require a separate medical certificate. At least they eventually allowed the DOT 

medical as many of the operators drove their truck cranes to the hoisting jobs. One of the 

trucks I occasionally drive is a tractor-trailer low boy. It is licensed for 125,000#. It is 

ironic that I can drive an over width 125,000# vehicle on two lane highways with a 

closing speed of over 1 00 mph on a medical certificate that does not allow me to fly a 

3000# airplane. 

I now get three physicals a year. The one at a Internal Medicine specialist that 

includes tests such as prostate exam, EKG, scheduled colonoscopies ect. They have the 

potential to find a life threatening problem. I schedule that physical close to 30 days from 

the FAA one so that the required hypertension report is current. Until this year I could do 

the DOT and the FAA at the same visit. They now both expire on the same day. Both 

exams have eye and hearing tests and with one visit there was less time loss from work. 

Now the clinic will not do both physicals on the same day. I will have three physicals 
within thirty days. The DOT is $50.00 that is direct billed to my employer, I pay 20% of 

the Internal Med one, and the FAA is $162 out of pocket. 

I am very much in favor ofthe AOPAIEAA 3rd Class Medical Exemption. I have used 

the AOPA Safety Foundation on line courses and would welcome a medical evaluation 

education program. 

Since I usually fly alone and seldom go farther thanlOO miles from home base and I 

normally fly a Cessna 172 I think the AOPAIEAA 3rd Class Medical Exemption would 

work well for me. Some of the nicest times to fly is in the evening and that comes early 

for several months here near the 451

h parallel. I would miss not being able to fly just after 

dark. It would be nice if the rule would read no night cross country. 

I am looking forward to introducing my grandchildren to aviation, when they get old 

enough. 

Hugh M. Fischer 

22190 Beaumont Way 

Farmington MN. 55024 

Email hmfisch@hotmail.com
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**























**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The BlackHawk Fund, a Nevada corporation
      (the Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Steve Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 12,
      2006




/s/
      Steve
      Bonenberger




By:
      Steve
      Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Lessons learned from using wild-caught and captive-reared lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) in captive experiments      

      May 4, 2024    

Waterfowl are housed in captivity for research studies that are infeasible in the wild. Accommodating the unique requirements of semi-aquatic species in captivity while meeting experimental design criteria for research questions can be challenging and may have unknown effects on animal health. Thus, testing and standardizing best husbandry and care practices for waterfowl is necessary to facilitate proper husbandry and humane care while ensuring reliable and repeatable research results. To inform husbandry practices for captive-reared and wild-caught lesser scaup (Aythya affinis; hereafter, scaup), we assessed body mass and fat composition across two different aspects of husbandry, source population (captive-reared or wild caught), and housing densities (birds/m2). Our results suggest that housing scaup at low densities (≤0.6 m2/bird, P = 0.049) relative to other species can minimize negative health effects. Captive-reared scaup were heavier (P = 0.027) with greater body fat (P < 0.001) and exhibited fewer signs of stress during handling than wild-caught scaup. In our experience, scaup which are captive-reared from eggs collected in the wild were better for long-term captivity studies as they maintained body mass between and recovered lost body mass following trials. Researchers would benefit from carefully evaluating the tradeoffs of using short- and long-term captive methods on their research question before designing projects, husbandry practices, and housing facilities for waterfowl.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Rebecca A Cole

##### Research Zoologist

National Wildlife Health Center

rcole@usgs.gov

608-270-2468

## Related Content

#### Rebecca A Cole

##### Research Zoologist

National Wildlife Health Center

rcole@usgs.gov

608-270-2468

### Contact

####               National Wildlife Health Center          

6006 Schroeder RoadMadison, WI53711-6223United States

asknwhc@usgs.gov

608-270-2400

608-270-2415
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2942 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cerium sulfide pigments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cerium 

sulfide pigments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERIUM SULFIDE PIGMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.90 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 cerium sulfide pigments) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2942 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0223 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0223

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 223/2004 of 9 February 2004 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 on the entry of certain names in the Register of certificates of specific character provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) 2082/92 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Hushållsost) **

*
Official Journal L 037 , 10/02/2004 P. 0003 - 0004 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 223/2004

of 9 February 2004

supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 on the entry of certain names in the Register of certificates of specific character provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) 2082/92 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Hushållsost)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92 of 14 July 1992 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92, Sweden has forwarded an application to the Commission for the name "Hushållsost" to be entered in the Register of certificates of specific character.

(2) The description "traditional speciality guaranteed" can only be used with names entered in that Register.

(3) No objection under Article 8 of that Regulation was sent to the Commission following the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union(2) of the name set out in the Annex hereto.

(4) As a consequence, the name set out in the Annex should be entered in the Register of certificates of specific character and thereby protected as a traditional speciality guaranteed within the Community under Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92.

(5) The Annex hereto supplements the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2301/97(3),

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name in the Annex hereto is hereby added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 and entered in the Register of certificates of specific character in accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92.

Protection under Article 13(2) of that Regulation shall not apply.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 February 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2) OJ C 110, 8.5.2003, p. 18 (Hushållsost).

(3) OJ L 319, 21.11.1997, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 317/2003 (OJ L 46, 20.2.2003, p. 19).

ANNEX

SWEDEN

Cheese

- Hushållsost
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip Dascher, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Philip Dascher Philip Dascher, Principal Executive Officer  Date: December 24, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2044
GEORGE C. MCCULLOUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-02104-GRA) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George C. McCullough, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: George C. McCullough appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCullough v. United States , No. 8:07-cv-02104-GRA (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE FISCAL  YEAR ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  2000,  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,370)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>