alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Quarry Visitor Center, Record of Decision, Dinosaur National 
Monument, UT

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision on the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Quarry Visitor Center, Dinosaur 
National Monument.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service announces the availability 
of the Record of Decision for the Quarry Visitor Center, Dinosaur 
National Monument, Utah. On September 2, 2008, the Regional Director, 
Intermountain Region, approved the Record of Decision for the project. 
As soon as practicable, the National Park Service will begin to 
implement the Preferred Alternative contained in the FEIS issued on 
March 27, 2008. Five alternatives were evaluated in the environmental 
impact statement. These include: Alternative A, No Action--Continue 
Current Management; Alternative B, the Preferred Alternative--
Rehabilitate or Replace the Exhibit Hall and Construct a New Facility 
Off-Site; Alternative C--Retain the Exhibit Hall and Construct a New 
Facility at the Quarry Visitor Center Site; Alternative D--Retain the 
Exhibit Hall and Construct Wings Similar to Existing Facility; 
Alternative E--Demolish the Entire Facility and Construct a New 
Facility at the Quarry Visitor Center Site.
    The Record of Decision includes a statement of the decision made, 
synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, 
a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, a finding 
of no impairment of park resources and values, a listing of measures to 
minimize environmental harm, and an overview of public involvement in 
the decision-making process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Risser, 4545 E. Highway 40, 
Dinosaur, CO 81610-9724 (970) 374-3001, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a775b484365685349495f487a544a49145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d994b8aba0868bb0aaaabcab99b7a9aaf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the Record of Decision may be 
obtained from the contact listed above or online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/DINO.

    Dated: March 13, 2009.
Michael D. Snyder,
Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. E9-9787 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-CR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3509 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to provide for 

expedited project implementation relating to the comprehensive Everglades restoration plan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2012 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 

to provide for expedited project implementation relating 

to the comprehensive Everglades restoration plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Everglades for the 

5 Next Generation Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 3509 IS

1 SEC. 2. COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION 

2 PLAN. 

3 Section 601(d) of the Water Resources Development 

4 Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–541; 114 Stat. 2684) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and subject 

7 to paragraph (3)’’ after ‘‘subsection (b) or (c)’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(3) EXPEDITED PROJECT IMPLEMENTA10 TION.—After completing a project implementation 

11 report prepared in accordance with subsections (f) 

12 and (h), the Secretary may carry out, without any 

13 further congressional authorization, projects for— 

14 ‘‘(A) the Caloosahatchee River (C–43) 

15 West Basin Storage Reservoir; 

16 ‘‘(B) the Biscayne Bay coastal wetland; 

17 ‘‘(C) Broward County water preserve 

18 areas; 

19 ‘‘(D) the C–111 Spreader Canal; 

20 ‘‘(E) any other project identified in the 

21 Plan for which a project implementation report 

22 is completed that is in accordance with an inte23 grated delivery schedule approved by the Chief 

24 of Engineers and the South Florida Water 

25 Management District, in consultation with the 

26 South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 3509 IS

1 Force, subject to the condition that the report 

2 is completed not later than 5 years after the 

3 date of enactment of this paragraph; and 

4 ‘‘(F) any group of projects under the Plan 

5 that the Secretary determines will provide re6 gional or watershed ecosystem or water supply 

7 benefits if the group of projects is constructed 

8 in accordance with a project implementation re9 port approved by the Chief of Engineers and 

10 the South Florida Water Management District, 

11 in consultation with the South Florida Eco12 system Restoration Task Force, not later than 

13 5 years after the date of enactment of this 

14 paragraph.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3630 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3630

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, Wisconsin, as the ``Captain 
                    Rhett W. Schiller Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2012

  Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. Kohl) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, Wisconsin, as the ``Captain 
                    Rhett W. Schiller Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN RHETT W. SCHILLER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, Wisconsin, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
Rhett W. Schiller Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



      CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Craig Crawford, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004,
     which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Registrant.



Date:  May 18, 2004

/s/ CRAIG CRAWFORD
-------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Landowner and practitioner perspectives on private land conservation programs      

      May 11, 2018    

Efforts to reverse declines in native grasslands benefit from agricultural policies that encourage private land conservation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) improved conservation across landscapes but enrollment has declined. We used sequential exploratory mixed methods to compare landowner and conservation practitioners’ perceptions, evaluate perceived benefits, and identify potential improvements to CRP. Focus groups of practitioners informed a quantitative survey of landowners who had properties >160 total acres in Nebraska. Results suggest potential misalignment in perceptions between practitioners and landowners. Practitioners were concerned that conservation, especially of wildlife, was secondary to profit. But the majority of landowners valued CRP-related ecosystem services, including native pollinators. Practitioners posited that younger landowners were primarily profit motivated, but CRP enrollment did not differ by demographics. Practitioners and landowners identified rule complexity as a major challenge and practitioner–landowner relationships as critical to success. Findings suggest that practitioners may underestimate non-economic motivations and illuminate opportunities to encourage private land conservation.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Cooperative Research Units Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

(703) 648 - 4260

(703) 648 - 4269

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Nebraska

View All **
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centra Software, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michelle M. Caggiano, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, of the Company, certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    MICHELLE M.
CAGGIANO                                          
|                       |  |  |  | Michelle M. Caggiano Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

IN RE: CASE NO. 19-17664-LMI

TIMOTHY SALLY CHAPTER 13

SSN: XXX-XXDebtors.

_________________/

OBJECTION TO MOTION TO VALUE AND DETERMINE SECURED STATUS 

OF LIEN ON REAL PROPERTY [D.E. 51]

AMERICAN INVESTMENT SERVICES, LLP. (“Secured Creditor”) by and through 

undersigned counsel, files this Objection to the Motion to Value and Determine Secured 

Status of Lien on Real Property [D.E. 51] and states as follows:

1. On June 10, 2019, Timothy Sally (“Debtor”) commenced this bankruptcy case 

by filing a petition for relief under Chapter 13.

2. The Secured Creditor holds a security interest in Debtor’s real property located 

at 1841 N.W. 67th Street, Miami, FL 33147 (the “Property”), by virtue of a third 

mortgage which is recorded in Official Records Book 25199 Page 1653 in the 

official records of Miami Dade County, Florida and re-recorded on January 31, 

2018, in Official Records Book 30848 Page 266, in the Public Records of Miami 

Dade County, Florida. 

3. Secured Creditor disputes the Debtor’s contention that the fair market value of 

the Property is only $105,000.00 and requests an opportunity to conduct its own 

evaluation and appraisal of the Property. 

Case 19-17664-LMI Doc 61 Filed 10/08/19 Page 1 of 2
4. The Secured creditor reserves the right to supplement this Response at or prior 

to any hearings scheduled on the Motion.

5. The Secured Creditor has incurred additional attorney’s fees and costs for 

having to file this response.

WHEREFORE, Secured Creditor requests that this Court deny the Debtor’s 

Motion, or in the alternative, and for such other and further relief the Court deems 

just and proper.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the Response to Motion to Value 

and Determine Secured Status of Lien on Real Property [D.E. 24] was served electronically 

or by mail on Nancy Neidich, Trustee, P.O. Box 279806, Miramar, FL 33027 and Maria 

Alvarez, Esq., 4343 West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33134 on October 8, 2019, 2019.

Respectfully Submitted,

SABRINA CHASSAGNE, P.A.

Attorney for Secured Creditor

 justice.one@earthlink.net

The White Building

Suite 208

One N.E. 2nd Avenue

Miami, FL 33132

Phone (305) 358-0005

By: s/Sabrina Chassagne

 Sabrina Chassagne

 Fla Bar No. 60682

Case 19-17664-LMI Doc 61 Filed 10/08/19 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Landscape ecology      

      January 1, 2007    

View Report

Over the next few years, the Leetown Science Center (LSC) would like to establish an expanded capability for conducting landscape ecology research.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
Exhibit 10.45

 

Directors’ Compensation Summary

 

Each director of Plains All American GP LLC who is not an employee of Plains All American GP LLC is reimbursed for any travel, lodging and other out-of-pocket expenses related to meeting attendance or otherwise related to service on the board (including, without limitation, reimbursement for continuing education expenses). Each non-employee director is currently paid an annual retainer fee of $45,000. Mr. Armstrong is otherwise compensated for his services as an employee and therefore receives no separate compensation for his services as a director. In addition to the annual retainer, each committee chairman (other than the chairman of the audit committee) receives $2,000 annually. The chairman of the audit committee receives $30,000 annually, and the other members of the audit committee receive $15,000 annually, in each case, in addition to the annual retainer.

 

Our non-employee directors receive LTIP awards or cash equivalent awards as part of their compensation. The LTIP awards vest annually in 25% increments over a four-year period and have an automatic re-grant feature such that as they vest, an equivalent amount is granted.  The awards have associated distribution equivalent rights that are payable quarterly.  The three non-employee directors who serve on the audit committee each have outstanding a grant of 10,000 units (vesting 2,500 units per year).  Messrs. Petersen, Raymond and Sinnott each have outstanding a grant of 5,000 units (vesting 1,250 units per year).  Upon vesting of the director LTIPs (other than the incremental audit committee awards), a cash payment will be made to Oxy as directed by the Oxy designee. Such cash payment is based on the unit value of Mr. Sinnott’s award on the previous year’s vesting date.

 

All LTIP awards held by a director vest in full upon the next following distribution date after the death or disability (as determined in good faith by the board) of the director. For audit committee grants, the awards also vest in full if such director (i) retires (no longer with full-time employment and no longer serving as an officer or director of any public company) or (ii) is removed from the board of directors or is not reelected to the board of directors, unless such removal or failure to reelect is for “good cause,” as defined in the letter granting the units.
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

104) IV-C-70 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:56 AM Sheet 104 of 232 
P.2 

/__ \ 

s rSL \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

FFB ! 6 1988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable James A. Courter 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D. C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Courter: 

Thank you for your letter of February 1, 1988, expressing 

your views on EPA's proposed regulations to control vapors 

generated during the refueling of motor vehicles by the use of 

onboard canisters. 

This proposal involves complex and controversial issues, 

and we have spent a great deal of time analyzing the environmental and economic impacts. We held a public hearing on the 

proposal this past October, and we expect to receive many 

additional comments by the time the comment period closes on 

February 11, 1988. A copy of your letter will be placed in 

the public docket for this rulemaking, and we do thank you 

for taking the time to comment on this important issue. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

j/cc: Docket A-87-11
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Jovian dust streams: A monitor of Io's volcanic plume activity      

      January 1, 2003    

Streams of high speed dust particles originate from Jupiter's moon Io. After release from Io, the particles collect electric charges in the Io plasma torus, gain energy from the co-rotating electric field of Jupiter's magnetosphere, and leave the Jovian system into interplanetary space with escape speeds over 200 km s−1. The Galileo spacecraft has continuously monitored the dust streams during 34 revolutions about Jupiter between 1996 and 2002. The observed dust fluxes exhibit large orbit-to-orbit variability due to systematic and stochastic changes. After removal of the systematic variations, the total dust emission rate of Io has been calculated. It varies between 10−3 and 10 kg s−1, and is typically in the range of 0.1 to 1 kg s−1. We compare the dust emission rate with other markers of volcanic activity on Io like large-area surface changes caused by volcanic deposits and sightings of volcanic plumes.

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Io
                  -  Jupiter

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Late Holocene earthquake history of the Brigham City segment of the Wasatch fault zone at the Hansen Canyon, Kotter Canyon, and Pearsons Canyon trench sites, Box Elder County, Utah      

      January 1, 2012    

View Document

Of the five central segments of the Wasatch fault zone (WFZ) having evidence of recurrent Holocene surface-faulting earthquakes, the Brigham City segment (BCS) has the longest elapsed time since its most recent surface-faulting event (~2.1 kyr) compared to its mean recurrence time between events (~1.3 kyr). Thus, the BCS has the highest time-dependent earthquake probability of the central WFZ. We excavated trenches at three sites––the Kotter Canyon and Hansen Canyon sites on the north-central BCS and Pearsons Canyon site on the southern BCS––to determine whether a surface-faulting earthquake younger than 2.1 ka occurred on the BCS. Paleoseismic data for Hansen Canyon and Kotter Canyon confirm that the youngest earthquake on the north-central BCS occurred before 2 ka, consistent with previous north-central BCS investigations at Bowden Canyon and Box Elder Canyon. At Hansen Canyon, the most recent earthquake is constrained to 2.1–4.2 ka and had 0.6–2.5 m of vertical displacement. At Kotter Canyon, we found evidence for two events at 2.5 ± 0.3 ka and 3.5 ± 0.3 ka, with an average displacement per event of 1.9–2.3 m. Paleoseismic data from Pearsons Canyon, on the previously unstudied southern BCS, indicate that a post-2 ka earthquake ruptured this part of the segment. The Pearsons Canyon earthquake occurred at 1.2 ± 0.04 ka and had 0.1–0.8 m of vertical displacement, consistent with our observation of continuous, youthful scarps on the southern 9 km of the BCS having 1–2 m of late Holocene(?) surface offset. The 1.2-ka earthquake on the southern BCS likely represents rupture across the Weber–Brigham City segment boundary from the penultimate Weber-segment earthquake at about 1.1 ka. The Pearsons Canyon data result in a revised length of the BCS that has not ruptured since 2 ka (with time-dependent probability implications), and provide compelling evidence of at least one segment-boundary failure and multi-segment rupture on the central WFZ. Our paleoseismic investigations of the BCS clarify the timing, displacement, and extent of late Holocene earthquakes on the segment, and importantly, confirm the long elapsed time since the most recent earthquake on most of the BCS.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Hansen Canyon;Kotter Canyon;Pearsons Canyon
                  - Utah
                  - Hansen Canyon
                  - Kotter Canyon
                  - Pearsons Canyon

View All **
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 2 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 3 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 4 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 5 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 6 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 6 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 7 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 7 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 8 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 8 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-18 Filed 10/22/20 Page 9 of 9 Case 13-13096-MAM Doc 150 Filed 12/18/13 Page 9 of 9