19998 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 82 / Thursday, April 30, 2009 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–64,431] 

Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, 

Anchorage, AK; Notice of Negative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated March 20, 2009, 

a company official requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

Department’s negative determination 

regarding eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA), applicable to 

workers and former workers of the 

subject firm. The denial notice was 

signed on January 26, 2009 and 

published in the Federal Register on 

February 23, 2009 (74 FR 8116). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of 

the law justified reconsideration of the 

decision. 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination, which was 

based on the finding that imports of 

crude oil did not contribute importantly 

to worker separations at the subject 

facility and there was no shift of 

production to a foreign country. The 

subject firm did not import crude oil nor 

shift production of crude oil to a foreign 

country during the 2006, 2007 and 

January through October 2008 period. 

The petitioner alleged that the subject 

firm had to automate their 30 year old 

manned facilities, in order to stay 

competitive with lower cost foreign 

crude oil production locations and 

reduce costs. 

The initial investigation, in fact, 

revealed that automation of the facilities 

and technological improvements were 

the reason behind the worker 

separations at the subject firm. 

The petitioner also alleged that 

foreign imports of crude oil have 

increased from 2003 through 2008, thus 

negatively impacting production of 

crude oil at the subject firm. 

In order to establish import impact, 

the Department considers import 

numbers for the relevant period (one 

year prior to the date of the petition). 

According to the data available from the 

United States Department of Energy, 

United States imports of crude oil have 

been decreasing absolutely and 

relatively to U.S. production of crude oil 

from 2006 to 2007 and further decreased 

from January through October 2008, 

when compared with the corresponding 

2007 period. 

The petitioner further alleges that job 

losses at the subject facility were also 

attributable to a shift in production of 

crude oil to foreign locations. 

The investigation revealed that 

Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, 

Anchorage Pipeline Service Company 

did not shift production of crude oil 

from the subject facility to a foreign 

country during the relevant period. 

The petitioner did not supply facts 

not previously considered; nor provide 

additional documentation indicating 

that there was either (1) a mistake in the 

determination of facts not previously 

considered or (2) a misinterpretation of 

facts or of the law justifying 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. 

After careful review of the request for 

reconsideration, the Department 

determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not 

been met. 

Conclusion 

After review of the application and 

investigative findings, I conclude that 

there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 14th day of 

April 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–9937 Filed 4–29–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–62,067] 

Crosible, Inc., U.S. Division, Including 

Workers Whose Wages Are Reported 

Under the Federal Employer 

Identification Number for Madison 

Filter Inc., Now Known as Clear Edge 

Filtration, Moravia, NY; Amended 

Certification Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance and Alternative Trade 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification Regarding Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance and Alternative Trade 

Adjustment Assistance on September 

12, 2007, applicable to workers and 

former workers of Crosible, Inc., U.S. 

Division, Moravia, New York. The 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register on September 27, 2007 (72 FR 

54939). The certification was amended 

on February 9, 2009 to reflect the new 

name of the subject firm, Clear Edge 

Filtration. The notice was published in 

the Federal Register on February 23, 

2009 (74 FR 8110–8111). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. Workers 

produce filters, made of fabric, used for 

air and water filtration systems. 

New information provided shows that 

some of the workers at the subject firm 

have their Unemployment Insurance 

wages reported under the tax account 

for Madison Filter Inc. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

Crosible, Inc., who were adversely 

affected by a shift of filter production to 

Mexico. Consequently, the Department 

is again amending the certification to 

properly reflect this matter. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–62,067 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

‘‘All workers of Crosible, Inc., U.S. 

Division, including workers whose wages are 

reported under the Federal Employer 

Identification Number for Madison Filter 

Inc., now known as Clear Edge Filtration, 

Moravia, New York, who became totally or 

partially separated from employment on or 

after August 27, 2006, through September 12, 

2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment 

assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 

of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 

alternative trade adjustment assistance under 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’ 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 82 / Thursday, April 30, 2009 / Notices 19999 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of 

April 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–9935 Filed 4–29–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[Notice (09–038)] 

National Space-Based Positioning, 

Navigation and Timing (PNT) Advisory 

Board; Meeting 

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 

Law 92–463, as amended, the National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration 

announces a meeting of the National 

Space-Based Positioning, Navigation 

and Timing (PNT) Advisory Board. The 

agenda for the meeting includes updates 

from each of the three PNT Panels 

(Leadership, Strategic Engagement and 

Communication, Future Challenges), 

including discussion and deliberation of 

potential recommendations. The PNT 

Advisory Board will address U.S. 

Government interests in the following 

areas: 

• Implementation of the President’s 

2004 U.S. Space-Based Positioning, 

Navigation and Timing Policy. 

• National Space-Based PNT 

Executive Committee, and National 

Space-Based PNT Coordination Office. 

• Global Positioning System (GPS) 

Constellation and Modernization Plans. 

• U.S. GPS Technological Leadership 

and Competitiveness. 

• Promoting and Branding Current 

and Future PNT Capabilities to the U.S. 

and International Communities. 

• Global Technical and Market 

Trends for PNT Services. 

• Future Areas of Study. 

DATES: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 9 a.m.– 

5 p.m.; Friday, May 15, 2009, 9 a.m.– 

1 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: Embassy Suites Hotel at 

Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 

Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015– 

2020, phone: 202–362–9300. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

James J. Miller, Space Operations 

Mission Directorate, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

Washington, DC, 20546. Phone 202– 

358–4417. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

meeting will be open to the public up 

to the seating capacity of the room. It is 

imperative that the meeting be held on 

this date to accommodate the 

scheduling priorities of the key 

participants. 

Dated: April 24, 2009. 

P. Diane Rausch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–9880 Filed 4–29–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510–13–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. NRC–2009–0155] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC). 

ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to 

submit an information collection 

request to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: The NRC invites public 

comment about our intention to request 

the OMB’s approval for renewal of an 

existing information collection that is 

summarized below. We are required to 

publish this notice in the Federal 

Register under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

Information pertaining to the 

requirement to be submitted: 

1. The title of the information 

collection: 10 CFR part 150, 

‘‘Exemptions and Continued Regulatory 

Authority in Agreement States and in 

Offshore Waters under section 274.’’ 

2. Current OMB approval number: 

3150–0032. 

3. How often the collection is 

required: 10 CFR 150.16(b), 150.17(c), 

and 150.19(c) require the submission of 

reports following specified events, such 

as the theft or unlawful diversion of 

licensed radioactive material. The 

source material inventory reports 

required under 10 CFR 150.17(b) must 

be submitted annually by certain 

licensees. 

4. Who is required or asked to report: 

Agreement State licensees authorized to 

possess source or special nuclear 

material at certain types of facilities, or 

at any one time and location in greater 

than specified amounts. In addition, 

persons engaging in activities in nonAgreement States, in areas of exclusive 

Federal jurisdiction within Agreement 

States, or in offshore waters. 

5. The number of annual respondents: 

15. 

6. The number of hours needed 

annually to complete the requirement or 

request: 190 hours. 

7. Abstract: 10 CFR part 150 provides 

certain exemptions from NRC 

regulations for persons in Agreement 

States. Part 150 also defines activities in 

Agreement States and in offshore waters 

over which NRC regulatory authority 

continues, including certain information 

collection requirements. The 

information is needed to permit NRC to 

make reports to other governments and 

the International Atomic Energy Agency 

in accordance with international 

agreements. The information is also 

used to carry out NRC’s safeguards and 

inspection programs. 

Submit, by June 29, 2009, comments 

that address the following questions: 

1. Is the proposed collection of 

information necessary for the NRC to 

properly perform its functions? Does the 

information have practical utility? 

2. Is the burden estimate accurate? 

3. Is there a way to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected? 

4. How can the burden of the 

information collection be minimized, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology? 

A copy of the draft supporting 

statement may be viewed free of charge 

at the NRC Public Document Room, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD 

20852. OMB clearance requests are 

available at the NRC worldwide Web 

site: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/ 

doc-comment/omb/index.html. The 

document will be available on the NRC 

home page site for 60 days after the 

signature date of this notice. Comments 

submitted in writing or in electronic 

form will be made available for public 

inspection. Because your comments will 

not be edited to remove any identifying 

or contact information, the NRC 

cautions you against including any 

information in your submission that you 

do not want to be publicly disclosed. 

Comments submitted should reference 

Docket No. NRC–2009–0155. You may 

submit your comments by any of the 

following methods. Electronic 

comments: Go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and search for 

Docket No. NRC–2009–0155. Mail 

comments to NRC Clearance Officer, 

Gregory Trussell (T–5 F53), U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001. Questions 

about the information collection 

requirements may be directed to the 

NRC Clearance Officer, Gregory Trussell