alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14 Conformed Copy

 

Lynnette C. Fallon

Executive Vice President HR/Legal and General Counsel

Tel: (978) 787-4120

Fax: (978) 787-4090

 

September 22, 2011

 

Mary G. Puma, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

108 Cherry Hill Drive

Beverly, Massachusetts 01915

 

Re: Base Compensation of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

 

Dear Mary:

 

As you know, at its meeting on April 26, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved an increase to your base pay to a rate of $550,000 per year, effective May 1, 2011.  This increase has not yet been implemented and you and the Compensation Committee have agreed that it will be implemented effective 1/1/2012.

 

Notwithstanding the delay in effectiveness of this salary increase, in the event that you are at any time entitled to separation pay under your Employment Agreement or your Change of Control Agreement with the Company, both dated as of November 6, 2007, your base compensation rate will be deemed to be the rate approved by the Compensation Committee on April 26, 2011 and all amounts due to you shall be calculated as if such increase had become effective on May 1, 2011 as initially contemplated by the Compensation Committee.

 

Please sign below to indicate your agreement to the foregoing.  Thank you.

 

	
 
    	
Best   regards,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
AXCELIS   TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Lynnette C. Fallon
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Lynnette   C. Fallon
    
	
 
    	
Executive   Vice President HR/Legal and General Counsel
    


 

 

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

 

	
/s/   Mary G. Puma
    	
 
    
	
Mary   G. Puma
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Meteoritical Bulletin, no. 85, 2001 September      

      January 1, 2001    

Meteoritical Bulletin No. 85 lists information for 1376 newly classified meteorites, comprising 658 from Antarctica, 409 from Africa, 265 from Asia (262 of which are from Oman), 31 from North America, 7 from South America, 3 from Australia, and 3 from Europe. Information is provided for 11 falls (Dergaon, Dunbogan, Gujba, Independence, Itqiy, Mora??vka, Oued el Hadjar, Sayama, Sologne, Valera, and Worden). Noteworthy non-Antarctic specimens include 5 martian meteorites (Dar al Gani 876, Northwest Africa 480 and 817, and Sayh al Uhaymir 051 and 094); 6 lunar meteorites (Dhofar 081, 280, and 287, and Northwest Africa 479, 482, and 773); an ungrouped enstatite-rich meteorite (Itqiy); a Bencubbin-like meteorite (Gujba); 9 iron meteorites; and a wide variety of other interesting stony meteorites, including CH, CK, CM, CO, CR, CV, R, enstatite, and unequilibrated ordinary chondrites, primitive achondrites, HED achondrites, and ureilites.

## Citation Information
p . L^-V*^<^\ ^ 

, ,'v-\i iV.Ci'li.'-'' Pinnacle Airlines Corp. 

"-'• '• ''••'•••Ori' i\\ '0'^ ' ^^^^ Noncornah Blvd. 

-.V,--|"/^nrb-M r'v'"" Suite 100 

, _,-.r I JiCi.r.M^.'.'.. ' MempNs.TN 38132 

90t-348-4100 

. . -1 -—i I. h n PNCL.com 

PINNACLE 

A l RLINE S COR R 

March 15,2011 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: HAS at Mason City, lA 

Docket OST-2001-10684 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

To the extent necessary. Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. ("Pinnacle") and Mesaba Aviation, Inc., d/b/a 

Mesaba Airlines ("Mesaba") jointly request that either carrier be deemed eligible to receive the 

EAS compensation established by Order 2010-5-18. Pinnacle and Mesaba are now both wholly 

owned subsidiaries of the holding corporation, Pinnacle Airlines, Corp. Both carriers currently 

operate and will continue to operate as "Delta Connection" carriers. 

Flights operated by Mesaba would use Saab 340 aircraft, and flights operated by Pinnacle 

would use 50 seat CRJ200 Regional Jet Aircraft. Mesaba and Pinnacle seek to provide EAS 

sen^ice on an interim basis pursuant to the rates established by Order 2010-5-18, and without 

prejudice to their ability to seek new EAS rates for CRJ200 service once the longer term fleet 

plans of the respective carriers are established. 

The community of Mason City, lA has authorized Mesaba and Pinnacle to state on its behalf 

that the community supports this request. 

Sincerely, 

D. Philip Reed / 

Vice President / 

Network Scheduling and Operations Analytics 

Pinnacle Airlines, Corp. 

cc: Maximillian Shemesh, General Counsel, Mesaba Airlines 

Eric Bookmeyer, Mayor Mason City Iowa 

Pamela Osgood, Airport Manager, Mason City Municipal Airport
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           The Montana earthquake of June 27, 1925      

      January 1, 1927    

View Document

The earthquake of June 27, 1925, in Montana caused considerable damage within an area of 600 square miles or more, the center of which is in latitude 46° 5' N. and longitude 111° 20' W., a short distance southeast of Lombard.  It was a seismic disturbance of the first order of magnitude, but, owing to the hour at which it occurred and to other fortunate circumstances, no lives were lost and no fires broke out.  The shock was startling throughout an area extending 75 miles or more in all directions from the epicenter and was sensible to persons within an area of 310,000 square miles.  Within the epicentral area brick buildings suffered severely, rocks fell from cliffs, cracks opened in the ground, and the inhabitants experienced the usual symptoms of illness and emotions of alarm.  Isoseismals drawn according to the Rossi-Forel scale show a wide indentation at the south due to a rapid decline of intensity in the volcanic area of Snake River Plain and Yellowstone Park.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Montana

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The inverse problem of argon diffusion from minerals: Determination of kinetic parameters from stepwise-heating experiments      

      January 1, 1997    

Results of two routine 40Ar/39Ar stepwise heating experiments on a biotite and a basanite are interpreted in terms of Fick's and Arrhenius' laws. Both patterns represent a saddle-shaped 39Ar release. Argon isotope spectra are suggested to be controlled by the activation energy of diffusion E and the frequency factor Do . The activation energy of 39Ar is lower than the one of 40Ar. This results in a preferable release of 40Ar relatively to 39Ar at high-temperature steps and an increasing high-temperature wing in the saddle-shaped age spectrum. At low temperatures, considerable losses and irregularities in release of mainly 39Ar are observed, which cause the decreasing low-temperature wing in the “saddle”. The suggestion of argon losses (mainly of 39Ar) from a loose, “unstable” zone of the mineral structures becomes justified. The n-irradiation of the samples and the shift of E of 39Ar towards lower values seems to explain the saddle-shaped age-spectra often encountered in 40Ar/39Ar-geochronometry.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-26 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-26 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BED XAVIER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2624 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) 

### ) Opinion filed February 9, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Susan Maulucci, Judge. Rachael E. Bushey of O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
#### Republic Company, Petitioner, *v.*Louis A. Medina, Jr., et al., Respondents.

District Court of Nassau County, First District,

June 1, 1973.

*Murray Seeman*for petitioner. *Legal Aid Society of Nassau County (Steven M. Tanenbuam*of counsel), for respondents.

Anthony Babbiebo, J.

After hearing, I find that the weight of the credible evidence clearly indicates that the respondent paid to the landlord the rents due and owing for October, 1972 and January, 1973.

The court further finds that upon the admission of the respondent there is due and owing to the petitioner the sum of $75 for April rent.

Accordingly, final judgment in favor of the petitioner in the sum of $75.

With respect to the attorney’s fees, despite paragraph 31 of the written lease, which provides for the expenses of attorney’s fees and disbursements and costs, counsel fees are denied. See Matter of *Edot Realty Co.*v. *Levinson*(54 Misc 2d 673), which decision the court is in full accord.
Ryan N. BARRETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

Ryan N. Barrett, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
1 

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-22-00236-CR

NO. 09-22-00237-CR 

________________

ALBERT CHARLES NUGENT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 356th District Court

Hardin County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 25,365 (count 1 and count 2) 

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an open plea, Appellant Albert Charles Nugent pled guilty to two counts of

the second-degree felony offense of indecency with a child by sexual contact. See

Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1), (d). The trial court assessed punishment of ten

years of confinement on each count to run concurrently. See id. § 12.33 (providing 

punishment range for second-degree felonies).
2

Nugent’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief presenting counsel’s 

professional evaluation of the record and concludes that the appeal is frivolous.

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1978). After Nugent’s counsel filed his brief, we granted an extension 

of time for Nugent to file a pro se response. Nugent has not filed a response.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has held that we need not address the merits 

of issues raised in an Anders brief. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005). Rather, an appellate court may determine: (1) “that the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and 

finds no reversible error[;]” or (2) “that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand 

the cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the 

issues.” Id.

Upon receiving an Anders brief, a court must conduct a full examination of 

the record to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous.Penson v. Ohio, 488 

U.S. 75, 80 (1988)(citing Anders, 386 U.S. at 744). We have reviewed the entire 

record and counsel’s brief and have found no reversible error, and we conclude the 

appeal is wholly frivolous. SeeBledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 827–28. Therefore, we find 

it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the 
3

appeal.Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We 

affirm the trial court’s judgments.1

AFFIRMED.

 ________________________________

W. SCOTT GOLEMON

Chief Justice

 

Submitted on February 22, 2023

Opinion Delivered March 8, 2023

Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.

1Nugent may challenge our decision by filing a petition for discretionary 

review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC17-938

____________

BRANDY BAIN JENNINGS,

Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

[January 29, 2018]

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Brandy Bain Jennings’ appeal of the circuit court’s 

order denying Jennings’ motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 

Jennings’ motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme 

Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on 

remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 

2161 (2017). This Court stayed Jennings’ appeal pending the disposition of 

Hitchcock v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017). After this 
- 2 -

Court decided Hitchcock, Jennings responded to this Court’s order to show cause 

arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Jennings’ response to the order to show cause, as well as the 

State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Jennings is not entitled to relief. A 

jury convicted Jennings of three counts of first-degree murder and recommended a 

death sentence for each murder by a vote of ten to two. Jennings v. State, 718 So. 

2d 144, 147 (Fla. 1998). Following the jury’s recommendations, the trial court 

sentenced Jennings to death on all three counts of murder. Id. Jennings’ sentences

of death became final in 1999. Jennings v. Florida, 527 U.S. 1042 (1999). Thus, 

Hurst does not apply retroactively to Jennings’ sentences of death. See Hitchcock, 

226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Jennings’ motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Jennings, we 

caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so 

ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 

v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 
- 3 -

final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 

opinion in Hitchcock.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Collier County, 

Frederick Robert Hardt, Judge - Case No. 111995CF002284AXXXXX

Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Bri Lacy, Staff Attorney, and 

Paul Kalil, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Ft.

Lauderdale, Florida,

for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Christina Z. 

Pacheco, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida,

for Appellee
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000329 05-JUL-2019 10:59 AM
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Inventory and analyses of information for flood plain management in North Dakota      

      January 1, 1983    

View Document

View Plate

Governmental units that have been identified as having flood hazard areas but do not have detailed base flood information are required to use the "best available data" to regulate new development or expansion of existing development in flood prone areas. Information for flood plain management has been identified for 95 governmental units in North Dakota and includes the determination of what data are available regarding flood hazards, hydraulics, and hydrology, and a review of these data to determine their adequacy for use in flood plain management. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

#### Dakota Water Science Center- Rapid City

1608 Mountain ViewRapid City, SD57702United States

(605) 394-3200

(605) 355-4523

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Dakota

View All **
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C ARM ON E. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. J. SHAW NEGO, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-16525 D.C . No. 1:03-c v-06336-AW ISKO M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Anthony W . Ishii, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Oc tobe r 14, 2014 * * B e fore : LEAVY, GOULD, a n d B ER Z ON, C irc uit Judge s . C arm on E. W arre n , a

C a lifornia

sta te prisone r, a

p pe a ls pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s orde r de ny ing his motion for re lie f from judgm e nt of the dism issa l of his a c tion for fa ilure to e xha ust a dm inistra

tive re m e die s. W e dism i ss this a ppe a l for la c k of jurisdic tion. 

# FIL ED OCT 21 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W arre n fa ile d to a ppe a l within 30 da

y s of April 23, 2013, the

date of the distric t c o urt’ s orde r de ny ing his motion for re lie f from judgm e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 4(a )(1)(A); Fe d. R . App. P. 4(c )(1) (“ [T] he notic e is tim e ly if it is de posite d in the institution’ s inte rna l m a il sy ste m on or be fore the la st da

y for filing.” ); Houston v . Lac k, 487 U.S. 266, 273 (1988) (“ [D] e live ry of a notic e of a ppe a l to prison a

ut horitie s would not unde

r any the ory c onstitute

a ‘ filing’ unle ss the n otic e we re de live re d for forwa rding to thedistric t c ourt.” ). Ac c ordingly , W arre n’ s notic e s of a

ppe a l we re untim e ly

and we la c k jurisdic tion. Se e Ste p hanie -C ardona LLC

v . Smith’s Food &

Drug C trs., Inc . , 476 F.3d 701, 703 (9th C ir. 2007) (“ A tim e l y notic e of a

ppe a l is a non-wa iva

b le jurisdic tiona l re quire m e nt.” ). DISM I SSE D.

1 3 - 1 6 5 2 5 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of The BlackHawk Fund, a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006,
as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Brent  Fouch, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 12, 2006.

                                   /s/  Brent Fouch
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Brent Fouch, Treasurer, Chief Financial
                                   Officer and Director






                               15
<PAGE>
# L_2012130EN.01002401.xml

| 17.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 130/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 130/24

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 124 of 27 April 2004
  )

On page 65, Annex I, point 102, new Annex XII, Chapter 1, Article 1(2):

for:

‘... and in the rate of annual change in the salary scales of EC officials as defined in Article 11 of this Annex.’,

read:

‘... and in the rate of annual change in the salary scales of officials as defined in Article 11 of this Annex.’.

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1291 KA 15-00846 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES M. CARLBERG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

HUNT & BAKER, HAMMONDSPORT (BRENDA SMITH ASTON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (JOHN C. TUNNEY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Steuben County Court (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered May 4, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq .), defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to grant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. We reject that contention. “A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted if there is ‘an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines’ ” ( People v Smith
, 122 AD3d 1325, 1325, quoting Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]). Defendant failed to identify or establish the existence of any such mitigating factor ( see People v Lowery , 140 AD3d 1141, 1142, lv denied 28 NY3d 903; see generally People v Gillotti , 23 NY3d 841, 861). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 11 for history of drug or alcohol abuse. Defendant’s criminal history includes two prior alcohol-related convictions ( see People v Green , 104 AD3d 1222, 1222, lv denied 21 NY3d 860), and his purported abstinence while incarcerated and limited consumption of alcohol during the brief period following his release is not necessarily predictive of his future behavior ( see People v Jackson , 134 AD3d 1580, 1580-1581; Green , 104 AD3d at 1223). The court also properly assessed 10 points under risk factor 13 for unsatisfactory conduct while supervised because the People established that defendant violated the terms of his supervision by engaging in-2- 1291 KA 15-00846

criminal conduct ( see People v Young , 108 AD3d 1232, 1233, lv denied 22 NY3d 853, rearg denied 22 NY3d 1036; People v Lowery , 93 AD3d 1269, 1270, lv denied 19 NY3d 807). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the assessment of points under risk factor 11 and risk factor 13 did not constitute impermissible double counting, notwithstanding the fact that the unsatisfactory conduct while supervised was alcohol-related.

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Dina Lavette WALKER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D18-0170

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Richard BLAIR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Veronica LILLO, Appellant, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D17-883

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018.

Feiler & Leach, P.L, and Martin E. Leach, for appellant.

Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Edward G. Guedes, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.