alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            5862
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1790
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1330
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      95988
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           12066
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             12136
<LOANS>                                         416116
<ALLOWANCE>                                       6484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  555212
<DEPOSITS>                                      382986
<SHORT-TERM>                                     20028
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4274
<LONG-TERM>                                      14395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         83978
<OTHER-SE>                                       49551
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  555212
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  31464
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 6970
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 38434
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               17641
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               18832
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            19602
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      810
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 218
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  19696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    386
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         386
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       572
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.97
<LOANS-NON>                                        406
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    323
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5672
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       16
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 6484
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              6484
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Darrell THORNTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1390

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1 **UNITED ST AT**  **ES ENVIRONMENT AL**  **PROTECTION A GENCY** 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105

Nov ember 23 , 20 10 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: BASELINE FLEET FILE IN SUPPORT OF THE NO TI CE PUBLIC

RUL E MAKING FROM: A. Neam , Assessment and Standards Division TO: EPA/NHTSA Joint Rulemaking to Establish L ig ht
- duty Vehicle GHG Emissions Standards and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017 and Later ; Docket Number EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0799 This memo was created to document the submission of the baseline fleet file into the docket. The file name to the baseline fleet file is “ 2011_08_12_2008 Prod Sum Truck Expansion GCWR_ For Docket.xlsx ”.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Transaction Management, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Lawrence Chimerine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.





Date:  November 15,
      2010/s/ Lawrence
      ChimerineChief
      Executive Officer and President
                      First
      Transaction Management, Inc.




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mineralogy and petrology of comet 81P/wild 2 nucleus samples      

      January 1, 2006    

The bulk of the comet 81P/Wild 2 (hereafter Wild 2) samples returned to Earth by the Stardust spacecraft appear to be weakly constructed mixtures of nanometer-scale grains, with occasional much larger (over 1 micrometer) ferromagnesian silicates, Fe-Ni sulfides, Fe-Ni metal, and accessory phases. The very wide range of olivine and low-Ca pyroxene compositions in comet Wild 2 requires a wide range of formation conditions, probably reflecting very different formation locations in the protoplanetary disk. The restricted compositional ranges of Fe-Ni sulfides, the wide range for silicates, and the absence of hydrous phases indicate that comet Wild 2 experienced little or no aqueous alteration. Less abundant Wild 2 materials include a refractory particle, whose presence appears to require radial transport in the early protoplanetary disk.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Sean T. Brennan

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

sbrennan@usgs.gov

703-648-6434

## Related Content

#### Sean T. Brennan

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

sbrennan@usgs.gov

703-648-6434

### Contacts

#### Sean T. Brennan

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

sbrennan@usgs.gov

703-648-6434
Exhibit 10.75

 

Change Order Form # 6

 

Change order under Agreement dated:  Third Amendment to Development and Clinical Supplies Agreement dated 29 September 2010

 

Between:  Radius Health, Inc and 3M

 

Project Name:  For the development of Radius’s BA-058 compound delivered via 3M’s Microstructured Transdermal Delivery System




 

Change requested by:  Radius

 

Name:  Gary Hattersley

Company:  Radius

Date:  1 June 2011

 

Description of change:

 

3M has been requested to add 5oC

8-month stability pull for CM-10-00503

3-month stability pull for TM-10-00569

3-month stability pull for TM-10-00570

4-month stability pull for TM-10-00584

@ [*] each pull.

 

 

 

 

 

 

In all other respects, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.




Requested task, dates and costs are approved by:

 

	
Company:   Radius Health, Inc
    	
 
    	
Company:   3M
    
	
Name:   Nick Harvey
    	
 
    	
Name:   Mary Mathisen
    
	
Signature:   /s/ Nick Harvey
    	
 
    	
Signature:   /s/ Mary Mathisen
    
	
Position:   CFO
    	
 
    	
Position:   Commercialization Mgr
    
	
Date   (dd/mm/yy): 6/16/11
    	
 
    	
Date (dd/mm/yy):   6/20/2011
    


 




* Confidential Treatment Requested by the Registrant.  Redacted Portion Filed Separately with the Commission.

 

1
Case 19-22077-EPK Doc 2 Filed 09/10/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-22077-EPK Doc 2 Filed 09/10/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-22077-EPK Doc 2 Filed 09/10/19 Page 3 of 3
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 77 (Thursday, April 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18576-18577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9310]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 18, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Big Mac Bancshares, Inc., Hoxie, Kansas; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Leonardville State Bank, Leonardville, Kansas.
    2. C & M Bancshares, Inc.; to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of

[[Page 18577]]

Missouri Federal Savings Bank (to be known as 1st Cameron State Bank), 
both of Cameron, Missouri, upon its conversion to a commerical bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 20, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-9310 Filed 4-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
Teddy Miles OSCEOLA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4304

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Landsat helps bolster food security      

      August 24, 2016    

View Report

Version History

One of the cruelest, most complex narratives in the world today (2019) is written in the hunger of sub-Saharan Africa. When famine is the only yield from the scorched Earth, survival often depends on a heart-rending calculation—how far is the distant feeding center and how close is the nearest well?

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Digital Learning Management (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Aurangzeb Bhatti
Aurangzeb BhattiPresident (Principal Executive Officer)     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|/s/ Umesh Patel
Umesh Patel Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

March 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Learning Management Corporation and will be retained by Digital Learning Management Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



30
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re:

Orestes Doreste Oquendo Case No.: 19-22149-LMI

Flor De Maria Ojeda-Doreste Chapter 13

Debtor(s).

 / 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO VALUE AND DETERMINE

SECURED STATUS OF LIEN OF

POINT LAKE CONDO ONE ASSOCIATION, INC. ON REAL PROPERTY(ECF 37)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on December 3, 2019, upon the Debtors’ Motion to Value

and Determine Secured Status of Lien on Real Property (ECF 37). The Court, having been advised

that all parties in attendance agreed to a continuance of the matter, and with good cause having been

shown, it is ORDERED:

1. The hearing on the Debtors’ Motion to Value and Determine Secured Status of Lien

on Real Property (ECF 37) has been continued to January 7, 2020 at 9:00AM, to be held at:

C. Clyde Atkins U.S. Courthouse, 301 N Miami Ave Courtroom 8 (LMI), Miami, FL 33128

###

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on December 6, 2019.

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-22149-LMI Doc 55 Filed 12/09/19 Page 1 of 2
Submitted by:

Mitchell J. Nowack, Esq.

NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC

8551 Sunrise Blvd., Suite 208

Plantation, FL 33322

(954) 349-2265

NOWACK & OLSON, PLLC is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all

interested parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a certificate of service.

Case 19-22149-LMI Doc 55 Filed 12/09/19 Page 2 of 2
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60334

 

CJC HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED,

PetitionerCross-Respondent,

versus

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

RespondentCross-Petitioner.

 

On Petition for Review and Cross-Application

for Enforcement of an Order of the 

National Labor Relations Board

(16-CV-16778-2)

 

March 11, 1997

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

After considering the briefs, relevant portions of the record,

and argument of counsel, the Court concludes that the petition for

review demonstrates no basis for granting relief to petitioner, and

accordingly the petition for review is denied and the application
2

for enforcement is granted. In this connection, the Court does not

construe the Board’s order as preventing petitioner from refusing

to agree to dues checkoff on the basis of a bona fide, principled

(or fundamental) opposition, on general policy grounds, to dues

checkoff, as distinguished from a refusal to agree to dues checkoff

for the ulterior purpose of avoiding any agreement on a labor

contract so as to achieve an impasse. 

Petition DENIED; Enforcement GRANTED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132022 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132022 

 COA: 267414 

Saginaw CC: 00-019407-FC 

JAMES REDWOOD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
*District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

 

**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 01-50113

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BOBBY LEE EARLS

Defendant-Appellant

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

_________________________________________________________________

November 6, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and VANCE*,

District Judge. 

PER CURIAM:**

Defendant–Appellant Bobby Lee Earls appeals his conviction

on one count of possession with intent to distribute five grams

or more of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)

and (b)(1)(B). Specifically, Earls challenges the district

court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence seized as a
2

result of what Earls contends was an illegal stop and detention. 

We need not decide whether the information contained in the

anonymous tip alone was sufficiently reliable to provide

reasonable suspicion for a Terry stop. The combination of the

anonymous tip and the independent corroborating observations of

the investigating officers--the shouted warning by the woman in

the apartment complex, Earls’s evasive and nervous behavior, and

his presence in an area known for drug trafficking--was

sufficient to provide the officers with reasonable suspicion to

stop the cab in which Earls was riding. See Illinois v. Wardlow,

528 U.S. 119, 124 (2000). The motion to suppress was correctly

denied. 

Earls’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Meteorite and meteoroid: New comprehensive definitions      

      January 1, 2010    

Meteorites have traditionally been defined as solid objects that have fallen to Earth from space. This definition, however, is no longer adequate. In recent decades, man-made objects have fallen to Earth from space, meteorites have been identified on the Moon and Mars, and small interplanetary objects have impacted orbiting spacecraft. Taking these facts and other potential complications into consideration, we offer new comprehensive definitions of the terms "meteorite,""meteoroid," and their smaller counterparts: A meteoroid is a 10-??m to 1-m-size natural solid object moving in interplanetary space. A micrometeoroid is a meteoroid 10 ??m to 2 mm in size. A meteorite is a natural, solid object larger than 10 ??m in size, derived from a celestial body, that was transported by natural means from the body on which it formed to a region outside the dominant gravitational influence of that body and that later collided with a natural or artificial body larger than itself (even if it is the same body from which it was launched). Weathering and other secondary processes do not affect an object's status as a meteorite as long as something recognizable remains of its original minerals or structure. An object loses its status as a meteorite if it is incorporated into a larger rock that becomes a meteorite itself. A micrometeorite is a meteorite between 10 ??m and 2 mm in size. Meteorite- "a solid substance or body falling from the high regions of the atmosphere" (Craig 1849); "[a] mass of stone and iron that ha[s] been directly observed to have fallen down to the Earth's surface" (translated from Cohen 1894); "[a] solid bod[y] which came to the earth from space" (Farrington 1915); "A mass of solid matter, too small to be considered an asteroid; either traveling through space as an unattached unit, or having landed on the earth and still retaining its identity" (Nininger 1933); "[a meteoroid] which has reached the surface of the Earth without being vaporized" (1958 International Astronomical Union (IAU) definition, quoted by Millman 1961); "a solid body which has arrived on the Earth from outer space" (Mason 1962); "[a] solid bod[y] which reach[es] the Earth (or the Moon, Mars, etc.) from interplanetary space and [is] large enough to survive passage through the Earth's (or Mars', etc.) atmosphere" (Gomes and Keil 1980); "[a meteoroid] that survive[s] passage through the atmosphere and fall[s] to earth" (Burke 1986); "a recovered fragment of a meteoroid that has survived transit through the earth's atmosphere" (McSween 1987); "[a] solid bod[y] of extraterrestrial material that penetrate[s] the atmosphere and reach[es] the Earth's surface" (Krot et al. 2003). ?? The Meteoritical Society, 2010.

## Citation Information
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5


<S>                                <C>

<CURRENCY>                          CANADIAN
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1.4433
<CASH>                              9,682
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       251,073
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         45,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    306,589
<PP&E>                              160,456
<DEPRECIATION>                      (76,280)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      390,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               504,623
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            3,223,995
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        390,765
<SALES>                             722,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    722,193
<CGS>                               222,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       2,610,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    728,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  13,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (4,159,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (4,159,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        (4,159,901)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0



</TABLE>