alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004227EN.01000501.xml

| 11.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3418 — GENERAL DYNAMICS/ALVIS)

(2004/C 227/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3418. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3418. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form, Revision 2.2 Page 1 of 1

8/28/2011

AD Title: Turbochargers

Docket No. FAA-2008-0314 Directorate Identifier: 2008-NE-09-AD

Costs:

Costs per Product (e.g., engine, propeller)

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

WorkhoursLabor cost 

(@$80/hour)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Applicability inspection 1.0 $ 80.00 $0 $ 80.00 620 $49,600

Gap measurement 3.0 $ 240.00 $0 $ 240.00 310 $74,400

Turbocharger 

replacement 4.0 $ 320.00 $2,500 $2,820.00 62 $174,840

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $298,840

Costs covered under warranty

Special considerations for Economic Analysis: Estimated reject rate from gap measurement not to exceed 20 

percent.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES explain below NO 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES explain below NO 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES explain below NO 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES explain below NO 

Explanation:
HIGH TOWER RESTORATION, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HIGH TOWER ROOFING AND CONTRACTING, LLC d/b/a High Tower Roofing, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1160

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO.: 19-22037-BKC-EPK

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

LAURA CICETTI

XXX-XX-0065

DEB _____________________________/ TOR

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION AND CANCELLATION OF HEARING

*** (Hearing Set for 10/13/2020 is cancelled) ***

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Robin R. Weiner, Esquire, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee hereby 

withdraws her Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Convert Case to Chapter 7, said motion having been 

made moot. The hearing set for October 13, 2020 at 1:00 pm on said motion is hereby cancelled.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 15th day of October, 2020.

/s/ Robin R. Weiner

ROBIN R. WEINER, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 559007

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33355-9007

TELEPHONE: 954-382-2001

FLORIDA BAR NO.: 861154

_____________________________________

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

LAURA CICETTI

5150 PRAIRIE DUNES VILLAGE CIR

LAKE WORTH, FL 33463

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

SEAN I. KOPLOW, ESQUIRE

8461 LAKE WORTH RD, SUITE 204

LAKE WORTH, FL 33467

Page 1 of 1

Case 19-22037-EPK Doc 79 Filed 10/15/20 Page 1 of 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 23, 2020

NO. 03-18-00673-CR

Ashlee Dunbar, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment revoking community supervision entered by the trial court. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in 

the court’s judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires 

correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to remove the assessment of 

attorney’s fees. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and 

unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
47188 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices 

Editorial Note: FR Doc. 06–6727 was 

originally published at page 44634 in the 

issue of Monday, August 7, 2006. In that 

publication a graphic was improperly 

substituted. The corrected document is 

republished in its entirety. 

[FR Doc. R6–6727 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 06–43] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification; 

Republication 

Editorial Note: FR Doc. 06–6728 was 

originally published at page 44637 in the 

issue of Monday, August 7, 2006. In that 

publication a graphic was improperly 

substituted. The corrected document is 

republished below in its entirety. 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 06–43 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: August 1, 2006. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN16AU06.002</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices 47189 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN16AU06.003</GPH>
47190 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN16AU06.004</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices 47191 

Editorial Note: FR Doc. 06–6728 was 

originally published at page 44637 in the 

issue of Monday, August 7, 2006. In that 

publication a graphic was improperly 

substituted. The corrected document is 

republished in its entirety. 

[FR Doc. R6–6728 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army; Corps of 

Engineers 

Intent To Prepare an Environmental 

Impact Statement To Evaluate the 

Impacts Associated With a Previously 

Authorized Pier Extension in Strait of 

Georgia at Cherry Point, Near 

Ferndale, Whatcom County, WA 

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 

Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers (Corps) Seattle District is the 

permitting agency and lead Federal 

agency for this action. The U.S Coast 

Guard (USCG) is cooperating agency. 

The Corps is announcing its intent to 

prepare an Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The 

EIS will support the Corps’ permit 

evaluation process under Section 10 of 

the Rivers and Harbors Act for the BP 

Cherry Point marine pier extension. 

DATES: Submit comments by September 

15, 2006. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN16AU06.005</GPH>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB of FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ginger B. Quealy, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 02, 2005


/s/ GINGER B. QUEALY
__________________________________
    Ginger B. Quealy
    President and Chief
    Executive Officer and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY  FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Amendment Number One to the MetLife Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.74 
 Amendment Number One to 
 The MetLife Deferred Compensation Plan for
Outside Directors 
 (as amended and restated as of December, 2003) (the “Plan”) 

The Plan is hereby amended in the manner set forth below, to the extent consistent with legal requirements to maintain the deferred
status of compensation credited under the Plan, including the grandfathered status of such deferrals precluding the applicability of United States Internal Revenue Code Section 409A: 

 

	 	1.	The third paragraph of the section entitled “Investment Tracking Funds” is amended and restated to read as follows: 


The Plan Administrator may eliminate or replace any investment tracking fund or index at any time. When the Plan Administrator has
determined to make a change, you will be informed and you will be given an opportunity to change your investment tracking selections to the extent they are affected by the change. Changes to investment tracking fund or index may be made without
amending the Plan document, but will be reflected in any amended and restated Plan document. 
 Any changes to investment
tracking funds or indices will be made only to the extent consistent with legal requirements to maintain the deferred status of compensation credited under the Plan, including the grandfathered status of such deferrals precluding the applicability
of United States Internal Revenue Code Section 409A 
  

	 	2.	This Amendment will be effective immediately upon execution. 

  

	 	3.	Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Plan (including any amendments thereto) shall continue in full force and effect without amendment.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is approved. 
 PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 
  

	
	/s/ Andrew J. Bernstein for Margery Brittain
	Date: 2-26-07
	Witness: /s/ Joo Young
Kang
David Antonio CANADY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2094

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017

David Antonio Canady, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**McDonald v. State*, 957 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 2007) ; *Knight v. State*, 808 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 2002) ; *Ellington v. State*, 96 So. 3d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ; *State v. Garcia*, 923 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ; *State v. Newmones*, 765 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

KELLY, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19591-19592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Termination of Preparation of an Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Harriet Tubman Special Resource Study

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Termination of preparation of an Environmental Impact 
Statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the termination of the process to 
develop an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Harriet Tubman 
Special Resource Study (SRS). The SRS was undertaken at the direction 
of Congress in Public Law 106-516 to evaluate sites related to Harriet 
Tubman for potential inclusion in the national park system. The study 
area includes parts of Maryland and New York. A Notice of Intent to 
Prepare an EIS was published in the Federal Register on February 7, 
2003.
    Initial formal public scoping took place through spring 2004, 
followed by continuous informal consultation with stakeholders, agency 
officials, and the interested public. From June through September 2008, 
NPS held stakeholder and public meetings and took comments on the 
preliminary alternatives.
    Scoping revealed no issues or controversy, nor the potential for 
significant environmental impacts. Therefore, it was determined that an 
Environmental Assessment (EA) would suffice to address National 
Environmental Policy Act requirements for this study.
    The Harriet Tubman Special Resource Study and Environmental 
Assessment was made available for public review starting 11/19/2008 
with the comment period ending 12/19/2008. The study report can be 
viewed at the NPS Planning, Environment and Public Comment (PEPC) Web 
site at: http://parkplanning.nps.gov/ or through the study Web site, 
http://www.HarrietTubmanStudy.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terrence Moore, Chief of Planning and Special Studies, National Park 
Service,

[[Page 19592]]

Northeast Region, 200 Chestnut Street, 3rd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 
19106.

Dennis R. Reidenbach,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. E9-9781 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
Case 19-22356-SMG Doc 21 Filed 10/17/19 Page 1 of 1
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0713 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0713

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 713/2004 of 16 April 2004 fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 139th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97 **

*
Official Journal L 111 , 17/04/2004 P. 0029 - 0030 Official Journal L 241 , 13/07/2004 P. 0017 - 0018 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 713/2004

of 16 April 2004

fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 139th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The intervention agencies are, pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2571/97 of 15 December 1997 on the sale of butter at reduced prices and the granting of aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for use in the manufacture of pastry products, ice-cream and other foodstuffs(2), to sell by invitation to tender certain quantities of butter of intervention stocks that they hold and to grant aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter. Article 18 of that Regulation stipulates that in the light of the tenders received in response to each individual invitation to tender a minimum selling price shall be fixed for butter and maximum aid shall be fixed for cream, butter and concentrated butter. It is further stipulated that the price or aid may vary according to the intended use of the butter, its fat content and the incorporation procedure, and that a decision may also be taken to make no award in response to the tenders submitted. The amount(s) of the processing securities must be fixed accordingly.

(2) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum aid and processing securities applying for the 139th individual invitation to tender, under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97, shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 April 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 April 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2) OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 186/2004.

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 16 April 2004 fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 139th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

>TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Monique van Oord, Chief Financial Officer of Linux Gold Corp.,
  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the
  year ended February 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
  78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  Linux Gold Corp.

Richmond, BC Canada

|              | by: /s/
      Monique van Oord
|------------- | ------------------------------
|March 2, 2007 |                               
|              | Monique van Oord              
|              | Chief Financial Officer       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold
  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---
Exhibit 10.9.3



 Exhibit 10.9.3 
 Amendment Agreement Number 2 
  

							
		 		 		 	 Barclays Bank PLC
 5 The
North Colonnade
 Canary Wharf, London E14 4BB
 Facsimile: +44 (20) 777 36461
 Telephone: +44 (20) 777 36810

		 		 		 	
		 		 		 	 c/o Barclays Capital Inc.

as Agent for Barclays Bank PLC
 745 Seventh
Ave
 New York, NY 10019
 Telephone: +1
212 412 4000


 Capital One Financial Corporation 
 1680 Capital One Drive 
 McLean, VA 22102 
 Attention: Simon Fairclough 

			
	Telephone No.:	 	703-720-1253
	Facsimile No.:	 	703-720-2165

 November 18, 2011 
 Dear Mr. Fairclough: 
 Reference is made to the Share Forward Transaction letter agreement
dated July 14, 2011, as amended and supplemented from time to time (including pursuant to Amendment Agreement Number 1 with respect thereto, dated November 1, 2011) , between Barclays Bank PLC, through its agent Barclays Capital Inc., and
Capital One Financial Corporation (the “Agreement”). The purpose of this letter agreement (this “Amendment Agreement”) is to amend certain terms set forth in the Agreement as described below. All capitalized terms
used, but not defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, Barclays and Counterparty hereby agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Settlement Notice Date: Clause (i) of the definition of Settlement Notice Date shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 (i) designated by Counterparty as a Settlement Notice Date by a written notice (a “Settlement
Notice”) delivered to Dealer prior to 11:59 p.m. New York time on the Scheduled Trading Day immediately preceding such Settlement Notice Date which shall also contain the applicable Settlement Shares and the election of Cash Settlement or
Net Share Settlement with respect to such Settlement Shares, if applicable; or 
  

	 	2.	Counterparts: This Amendment Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original with the same effect as if the signatures
thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 

  

	 	3.	Governing Law: This Amendment Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 


Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 







 Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth the terms and conditions of our agreement by
executing this Amendment Agreement Number 2. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC., 
 acting solely as Agent in connection with this
Transaction

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Robinson

		 	Name: Paul Robinson
		 	Title: Managing Director
	
	Accepted and confirmed as of the Trade Date:
	
	CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen Linehan

		 	Name: Stephen Linehan
		 	Title: EVP, Treasurer
1 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

In re: 

LOUIS TINO FISHER, Case No.: 19-19710-RBR 

Chapter 7 

Debtor. 

 / 

ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, MOTION TO DISMISS CASE FILED BY 

CREDITOR THEODORE ROBERTS (ECF 10) 

THIS CAUSE having come before the court on September 4, 2019, for the hearing on the 

Creditor Theodore Roberts’ Motion to Dismiss Case (the “Motion”). [ECF 10]. With the Court, 

having considered the Motion, and Debtor’s Response to Creditor Theodore Roberts’ Motion to 

Dismiss Case, [ECF 16], and having reviewed the record and heard the arguments of counsel, it is 

ORDERED that the Motion is denied without prejudice. 

### 

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 10, 2019.

Raymond B. Ray, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-19710-SMG Doc 23 Filed 09/11/19 Page 1 of 2
2 

Submitted by: 

Christian J. Olson, Esq. 

Nowack & Olson, PLLC 

8551 Sunrise Blvd., Suite 208 

Plantation, FL 33322 

(954) 349-2265 

Copies furnished to: 

Debtor’s Attorney Olson is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order to all creditors and 

interested parties immediately upon receipt hereof and file a Certificate of Service. 

Case 19-19710-SMG Doc 23 Filed 09/11/19 Page 2 of 2