alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of advisory committee meeting cancellation.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense published a closed meeting notice of Defense Science Board on April 6, 2009 (74 FR 15461). The Defense Science Board task force on Joint Professional Military Education meeting scheduled for April 28-29, 2009; at SAIC, 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203, was cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        CDR Kenneth Spurlock, Navy Military Assistant, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3B888A, Washington, DC 20301-3140, via e-mail at                         *Kenneth.spurlock@osd.mil*, or via phone at (703) 571-0083.                    

 April 27, 2009.

Morgan E. Frazier,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E9-9903 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          83,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,182
<PP&E>                                         181,869<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,719
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,852
<OTHER-SE>                                     255,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,051
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (50,036)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (50,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (50,036)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (50,036)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)
<FN>
<F1>5-02(B) includes $122,410 restricted cash.
</FN>


</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3630 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain 

Rhett W. Schiller Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2012 

Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. KOHL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, 

Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN RHETT W. SCHILLER POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in 

6 Waterford, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 3630 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. 

5 Schiller Post Office’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
```

                                                                     Exhibit 3.1

CONTINUATION PAGE TO CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT...

Article Fourth of the Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

"Fourth:  Capital Stock

The total number of shares that may be issued by the corporation is Nine Hundred
Fifty Million (950,000,000) shares, of which Nine Hundred Million (900,000,000)
shares with a par value of $.001 per share, amounting in the aggregate to Nine
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($900,000) shall be designated "Common Stock," and of
which Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares with a par value of $.001 per share,
amounting in the aggregate to Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) shall be
designated "Preferred Stock." The Preferred Stock may be issued from time to
time in one or more series. The board of directors is authorized to fix the
number of shares of any series of Preferred Stock, to determine the designation
of any such series and to determine or alter the rights, preferences,
privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions granted to or imposed
upon any wholly unissued series of Preferred Stock and, within the limits and
restrictions stated in any resolution or resolutions of the board of directors
originally fixing the number of shares constituting any series, to increase or
decrease (but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding)
the number of shares of any such series subsequent to the issue of shares of
that series."
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Optio Software, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Caroline Bembry, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting
officer) of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Caroline Bembry    
|                    |  |     |  | Caroline Bembry        
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the annual report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed to be a separate disclosure document.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Little Sioux River Basin floods      

      January 1, 1966    

View Document

Highway engineers and many others use flood stages and discharges in the design of bridges and other structures or operations on the flood plain of a stream. These data are provided in the form of gaging-station and other flood records and as flood profiles. Flood-frequency data are used to compute the 25- and 50-year recurrence interval discharges along the Little Sioux River from mile 24 to the Minnesota State line. The profiles of these two floods are computed and presented together with the profiles of the floods that occurred in 1965 and certain prior years. Less complete data are presented for the Ocheyedan and Maple Rivers, tributaries of the Little Sioux River.

Stage and discharge tabulations at 8 gaging stations for the 1965 flood can be used for volumetric computation. The same data can also be used to determine the time the flood was above a selected stage.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Little Sioux River
                  -  Maple River
                  -  Ocheyedan River
                  - iowa
                  -  Minnesota

View All **
Order entered October , 2012

In The 

### Court of appeato jriftb IlDi5stritt of 

# Texass at /Dams

No. 05-11-01268-CR No. 05-11-01269-CR TIEN JUNG KUO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-55962-J, F10-55963-J



### ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeals. On September 18, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter's record has not been filed. On October 4, 2012, we received appellant's motions to dismiss the appeals, signed by both appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Accordingly, we conclude findings are no longer necessary and VACATE the September 18, 2012 order. We DENY appellant's January 7, 2012 motions to dismiss because they were not signed by both appellant and counsel.We will dispose of appellant's October 4, 2012 motions to dismiss the appeals in due

course.

15AVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
March 2 4 , 2015

Brian Zamudio

Persistence Mining, Inc.

5666 La Jolla Boulevard, Suite 315

La Jolla, CA 92037

Dear Mr. Zamudio :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your March 4 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of Persistence Mining, Inc. into

the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0566 ) , but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments availab le to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, and 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

*Dates:*                     Written comments should be received on or before May 28, 2009 to be assured of consideration.                

## Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

*OMB Number:*                     1545-2122.                

*Type of Review:*                     Revision.                

*Form:*                     8931.                

*Title:*                     Form 8931, Agricultural Chemicals Security Credit.                

*Description:*                     This is a new form for tax year 2008 in response to Public Law 110-246 Section 15343. To allow taxpayers to calculate credits against income tax allowed by new provisions in law.                

*Respondents:*                     Businesses or other for-profits.                

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     389,330 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     R. Joseph Durbala, (202) 622-3634, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Shagufta Ahmed, (202) 395-7873, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                

Celina Elphage,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-9597 Filed 4-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EDISON SHINO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-10208

D.C. No. 1:03-cr-05453-LJO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016** 

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Edison Shino appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a

sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

AUG 01 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Shino contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment

782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether a district court had

authority to modify a sentence under section 3582(c)(2). See United States v.

Waters, 771 F.3d 679, 680 (9th Cir. 2014). As the district court correctly

concluded, even assuming that Amendment 782 reduced Shino’s Guidelines range

to 210-262 months, Shino is ineligible for a sentence reduction because his

sentence is already below the minimum of that range. See U.S.S.G. 

§ 1B1.10(b)(2)(A) (“[T]he court shall not reduce the defendant’s term of

imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and this policy statement to a term that

is less than the minimum of the amended guideline range.”). Moreover, as Shino

acknowledges, his argument that applying section 1B1.10(b)(2)(A) to his case

violates the Ex Post Facto Clause is foreclosed by our decision in Waters. See

Waters, 771 F.3d at 681.

We decline to consider Shino’s argument, raised for the first time in his

reply brief, that Waters is distinguishable. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983,

985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

AFFIRMED.

2 15-10208
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of OpenTV Corp. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig M. Waggy, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    | By:    | /s/ CRAIG M. WAGGY     
|------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                    |        |                        
|                    | Name:  | Craig M. Waggy         
|                    | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
|                    |        |                        
|Dated: May 15, 2003 |        |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to OpenTV Corp. and will be retained by OpenTV Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 11-698V (Not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

JANICE GLAUS

, * * Filed: July 23, 2014 Petitioner, *

*

v. *

* Decision by Stipulation; Attorneys’

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Fees and Costs AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

John R. Howie, Howie Law, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Debra A. Filteau Begley , U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DECISION 1

On October 21, 2011, Janice Glaus filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. On February 18 2014, the parties filed a stipulation detailing an amount to be awarded to Petitioner. On February 19, 2014, I issued a decision finding the parties’ stipulation to be reasonable and granting Petitioner the award outlined by the stipulation.

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, it will be posted on the United

States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, §
205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42 U.S.C §

300aa

- 12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential
information. To do so, Vaccine Rule 18(b) permit each party 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is
privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute
a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the decision will be available to the
public. Id.On July 23, 2014, counsel for both parties filed another joint stipulation, this time regarding attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties have stipulated that Petitioner’s counsel should receive a lump sum of $ 23,912.86 in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel. This amount represents a sum to which Respondent does not object. In addition, in accordance with General Order #9, Petitioner filed a statement on July 23, 2014

, indicating that she had incurred no reimbursable costs in pursuit of her claim.

I approve the requested amount for attorneys’ fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly, an award should be made in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, John R. Howie, Esq., in the amount of $ 23,912.86 . In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER

JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 2



### IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing (jointly or separately) notices renouncing their right to seek review.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06574**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06574\06574_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06574\06574_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06574\06574_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06574\06574_PART A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06574\06574_PART E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06574\06574_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06574\Certification Statement_ 06574.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 06574\Supporting Documents\06574_A5-2 MAP-1.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 06574\Supporting Documents\06574_A5-2 MAP-2.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06574\Supporting Documents\06574_A5-2 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.