alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, C. Wayne Cape,certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Optio Software, Inc.; 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that the materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and 

(b)         intentionallyleft blank 

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(d)         Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

Date:June 14, 2007
|          | /s/ C. Wayne Cape        |   |
|----------|--------------------------|--------|
| * * | *C.  Wayne Cape*         |
|     | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00250

- CR

Mark Ploeger v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County , Texas Trial Cause No. 60

- 17

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 23, 2019
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
              TELEMATE.NET SOFTWARE, INC. 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


         THIS AMENDMENT TO THE TELEMATE.NET SOFTWARE, INC. 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE
PLAN (the "Amendment") is made effective as of the 19th day of April, 2000, by
TELEMATE.NET SOFTWARE, INC., a corporation organized under and doing business
under the laws of the State of Georgia (the "Company"). All capitalized terms in
this Amendment have the meaning ascribed to such term as in the Telemate.Net
Software, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), unless otherwise stated
herein.

         Pursuant to the authority conferred upon the Company by the Company's
shareholders in a meeting held on May 31, 2000, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows:

                  Section 3 of the Plan is amended by deleting the first
         sentence thereof in its entirety and substituting therefor the
         following new sentence: "The total number of Shares that may be issued
         pursuant to Stock Incentives under this Plan shall not exceed Two
         Million, Fifty-Five Thousand, Three Hundred and Eighty-Four
         (2,055,384), as adjusted pursuant to Section 11."

         Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this AMENDMENT TO THE
TELEMATE.NET SOFTWARE, INC. 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN to be executed, effective
as of the 19th day of April, 2000.

                                     TELEMATE.NET SOFTWARE, INC.


                                     By:            /s/ Richard L. Mauro
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:    Richard L. Maruo
                                                --------------------------------
                                           Title:   CEO and President
                                                 -------------------------------
Jerilyn Joan MCMAHON and Dale Keith McMahon, Appellants, v. DIGITAL RECEPTION SERVICES, and Tracy A. Keough, Appellees.

Case Nos. 2D16-5353 2D16-5606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21.1


                         HORSESHOE GAMING HOLDING CORP.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                       STATE OF INCORPORATION/FORMATION
----------                                       --------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>
Horseshoe GP, Inc. (1)                                        Nevada
New Gaming Capital Partnership (2)                            Nevada
Horseshoe Entertainment (3)                                   Louisiana
Bossier City Land Corporation (4)                             Louisiana
Robinson Property Group, Limited Partnership (2)              Mississippi
Horseshoe Hammond, Inc. (1)                                   Indiana
Hammond Residential LLC (5)                                   Indiana
Horseshoe Gaming, Inc. (1)                                    Nevada
Horseshoe Ventures, LLC (6)                                   Delaware
Red Oak Insurance Company Ltd. (1)                            Barbados
Horseshoe Shreveport, L.L.C.(1)                               Louisiana
Casino Computer Programming, Inc.(1)                          Indiana
Horseshoe License Company (7)                                 Nevada
Horseshoe Casino MO, LLC (8)                                  Missouri
South China Development Partnership (9)                       Nevada
</TABLE>


(1) 100% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.
(2) 99% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp. through Limited Partner interest
    and 1% owned by Horseshoe GP, Inc. through General Partner interest
(3) New Gaming Capital Partnership owns 89% General Partner interest and a 2.92%
    Limited Partner interest. Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp. owns the remaining
    8.08% Limited Partner interest.
(4) 100% owned by Horseshoe Entertainment
(5) 100% owned by Horseshoe Hammond, Inc.
(6) 80% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.
(7) 49% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.
(8) 70% owned by Horseshoe Ventures, LLC
(9) 31% owned by Horseshoe Ventures, LLC
Order entered October 11, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00362

- CV

TRANSCONTINENTAL REA LTY INVESTORS, INC, Appellant

V.

SIDNEY WICKS, AS TRU STEE OF THE

SIDNEY WICKS REVOCAB LE TRUST

, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 10

- 15435



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s October 7, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to

file a reply brief. Appellant shall file its reply brief on or before Octobe r 31, 2013.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: MARY Z. MIRIAN Case No: 19-21621-LMI

 Chapter 13

 Debtor /

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 22, 2020, a true and correct copies of the 

Debtor’s First Amended Plan (DE 49) Objection to Claim of HSBC (DE 50) and Notice of 

Hearing (DE 51) were transmitted electronically to:

Jennifer Laufgas on behalf of Creditor HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

ecfflsb@aldridgepite.com, jlaufgas@ecf.courtdrive.com

Nancy K. Neidich

e2c8f01@ch13miami.com, ecf2@ch13miami.com

Office of the US Trustee

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

And a copy of the First Amended Plan (DE 49) was mailed on March 23, 2020, to:

LVNV Funding LLC

Resurgent Capital Services

PO Box 10587

Greenville, SC 29603-0587

CACH, LLC

Resurgent Capital Services

PO Box 10587

Greenville, SC 29603-0587

Respectfully submitted,

LEGAL SERVICES OF GREATER 

MIAMI, INC.

By /s/ 

Carolina A. Lombardi

Florida Bar No. 241970

Attorney for Debtor

4343 W. Flagler St., Suite 100

Miami, FL 33134

Telephone/Facsimile: (305) 438-2427

Email: clombardi@legalservicesmiami.org

Case 19-21621-AJC Doc 52 Filed 03/22/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Alt. Email: Sfreire@legalservicesmiami.org

Case 19-21621-AJC Doc 52 Filed 03/22/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 1 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 2 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 3 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 4 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 5 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 6 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 7 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 8 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 9 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 10 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 11 of 12

Case 19-24331-PDR    Doc 112    Filed 04/28/21    Page 12 of 12
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Cleveland Hart Case No. 19-21093-LMI

Chapter 13

Debtor /

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Debtor certifies that a copy of the Debtor’s Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan [D.E. 30] was 

sent via CM/ECF on October 22, 2019, to:

Nancy K. Neidich

e2c8f01@ch13miami.com, ecf2@ch13miami.com

Office of the US Trustee

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

Served by US Mail on October 22, 2019:

Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Champion Mortgage Company

c/o Shirley Palumbo of Greenspoon Marder LLC

City Place

525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 900

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Champion Mortgage Company

8950 Cypress Waters Blvd.

Coppell, TX 75019

I certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court 

set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

Respectfully submitted, 

Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc.

Attorney for Debtor

Address: 4343 West Flagler Street, Suite 100

Telephone/Fax: (305) 438-2423

Email: malvarez@legalservicesmiami.org 

 /s/ 

Maria Alvarez

Florida Bar No.: 57141

Case 19-21093-LMI Doc 31 Filed 10/22/19 Page 1 of 1
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 6 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 7 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 8 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 9 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 10 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 11 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 12 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 13 of 14
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 14 of 14
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert C. Jones, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TANYA R. SPALLIERO, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-55732 D.C. No. 5:08-cv-00834-RGK-E
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 2, 2010 ** Pasadena, California Before: RAWLINSON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge. *** 

# FILED
DEC 28 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 OVERVIEW Appellant Tanya Spalliero (Spalliero) ch allenges the district court’s decision upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Spalliero’s application for additional disability insurance benefits.

1. The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner because the Administrative Law Judge’s determination that Spalliero’s impairment did not meet or equal the asthma listing was supported by substantial evidence. See 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1 § 303B. Spalliero offered no evidence to contravene the medical testimony of the physician who testified at the hearing. See Reddick v. Chater , 157 F.3d 715, 725 (9th Cir. 1998) (recognizing the importance of an uncontroverted medical opinion).

2. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ad equately developed the record by providing Spalliero the opportunity to produce medical records to support her claim, and by having a medical expert and vocational expert available to interpret the medical evidence. See Mayes v. Massanari , 276 F.3d 453, 459-60 (9th Cir. 2001), as amended
.3 3. The ALJ sufficiently incorporated Spalliero’s limitations into the hypotheticals he presented to the vocational expert. His hypothetical questions to the vocational expert concerning claimant ’s limitations were expressly based on the testimony of the medical expert. See Osenbrock v. Apfel , 240 F.3d 1157, 1165 (9th Cir. 1999) (noting that an ALJ is free to reject restrictions that are not supported by the evidence).

4. Although the ALJ was frustrated with Sp alliero’s counsel, Spalliero did not establish that there was a conflict of interest or other specific indication of bias. See Valentine v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin. , 574 F.3d 685, 690 (9th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted). “[E]xpressions of impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance, and even anger, that are within the bounds of what imperfect men and women sometimes display, do not establish bias.” Id. (citation and alteration omitted).

5. There was no evidence that the record was altered. The ALJ’s statements expressing his concern and frustration of Sp alliero’s representation were set forth in the record. AFFIRMED.
Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 2 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 3 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 4 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 5 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 6 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 7 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 8 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 9 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 10 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 11 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 12 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 13 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 14 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 15 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 17 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 18 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 19 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 20 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 21 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 22 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 23 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 24 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 25 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 26 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 27 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 28 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 29 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 30 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 31 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 32 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 33 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 34 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 35 of 36Case 19-19182-RAM Doc 1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 36 of 36
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Sean A. Dobson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of the USAutos Series 2004-1
Trust (the "Trust");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the pooling and servicing,
or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with the
terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the Depositor and the Trustee has each fulfilled its
obligations under the servicing agreement; and

5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: September 19, 2007

 /s/ Sean A. Dobson
------------------------------------
Sean A. Dobson, President
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Lithogeochemical character of near-surface bedrock in the New England coastal basins      

      January 1, 2002    

This geographic information system (GIS) data layer shows the generalized lithologic and geochemical, termed lithogeochemical, character of  near-surface bedrock in the New England Coastal Basin (NECB) study area of the U.S. Geological Survey's National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. The area encompasses 23,000 square miles in western and central Maine, eastern Massachusetts, most of Rhode Island, eastern New Hampshire and a small part of eastern Connecticut.  The NECB study area includes the Kennebec, Androscoggin, Saco, Merrimack, Charles, and Blackstone River Basins, as well as all of Cape Cod. 

Bedrock units in the NECB study area are classified into lithogeochemical units based on the relative reactivity of their constituent minerals to dissolution and the presence of carbonate or sulfide minerals.  The 38 lithogeochemical units are generalized into 7 major groups: (1) carbonate-bearing metasedimentary rocks; (2) primarily noncalcareous, clastic sedimentary rocks with restricted deposition in discrete fault-bounded sedimentary basins of Mississipian or younger age; (3) primarily noncalcareous, clastic sedimentary rocks at or above biotite-grade of regional metamorphism; (4) mafic igneous rocks and their metamorphic equivalents; (5) ultramafic rocks; (6) felsic igneous rocks and their metamorphic equivalents; and (7) unconsolidated and poorly consolidated sediments.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Leslie A DeSimone

##### Hydrologist

New England Water Science Center

ldesimon@usgs.gov

508-490-5023

## Related Content

#### Leslie A DeSimone

##### Hydrologist

New England Water Science Center

ldesimon@usgs.gov

508-490-5023

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Mail Stop 954Reston, VA20192United States

####               New England Water Science Center          

10 Bearfoot RdNorthborough, MA01532United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - New England Coastal basin
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Maine
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  Rhode Island

View All **