alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Amendment to the Savings and Investment Plan



 Exhibit 10.20.d 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT 
 OF 

FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN 
 WHEREAS, FMC Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the FMC Technologies, Inc. Savings and Investment Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002 (the “Plan);

 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to memorialize its operational compliance with the 2009 minimum
required distribution waiver rules under the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the
Fourth Amendment will supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of the amendment; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority reserved to the Company by Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective January 1, 2009: 

 

	 	•	 	 Section 5.2 is hereby amended to add a new subsection 5.2.7 to the end thereto to read as follows: 



5.2.7 2009 Required Minimum Distributions. Notwithstanding Section 5.2 of the Plan, Article V-A of the Plan or any other
provisions of the Plan, a Participant or Beneficiary who would have been required to receive required minimum distributions for 2009 but for the enactment of Section 401(a)(9)(H) of the Code (“2009 RMDs”), and who would have satisfied
that requirement by receiving distributions that are (1) equal to the 2009 RMDs or (2) one or more payments in a series of substantially equal distributions (that include the 2009 RMDs) made at least annually and expected to last for the
life (or life expectancy) of the Participant, the joint lives (or joint life expectancy) of the Participant and the Participant’s Beneficiary, or for a period of at least 10 years (“Extended 2009 RMDs”), will not receive those
distributions for 2009 unless the Participant or Beneficiary chooses to receive such distributions. Participants and Beneficiaries described in the preceding sentence will be given the opportunity to elect to receive the distributions described in
the preceding sentence and shall make such distribution election on a form designated by the Administrator. In addition, notwithstanding any Plan provision to the contrary, and solely for purposes of applying the direct rollover provisions of the
Plan, 2009 RMDs and Extended 2009 RMDs will be treated as eligible rollover distributions in 2009. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by a duly
authorized representative this 22 day of December, 2011. 
  

			
	FMC Technologies, Inc.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mark J. Scott
	Its:	 	VP Administration



  
 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uranium Power Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                          |  |    |                           |                                      
|------------------------- |  | -- | ------------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Dated: September 17, 2003 |  | By | /s/ THORNTON J.
DONALDSON
|                          |  |    |                           |                                      
|                          |  |    |                           | Thornton J. Donaldson,               
|                          |  |    |                           | President and Chief Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Multichannel analysis of surface wave method with the autojuggie              

      January 1, 2003    

The shear (S)-wave velocity of near-surface materials and its effect on seismic-wave propagation are of fundamental interest in many engineering, environmental, and groundwater studies. The multichannel analysis of surface wave (MASW) method provides a robust, efficient, and accurate tool to observe near-surface S-wave velocity. A recently developed device used to place large numbers of closely spaced geophones simultaneously and automatically (the 'autojuggie') is shown here to be applicable to the collection of MASW data. In order to demonstrate the use of the autojuggie in the MASW method, we compared high-frequency surface-wave data acquired from conventionally planted geophones (control line) to data collected in parallel with the automatically planted geophones attached to steel bars (test line). The results demonstrate that the autojuggie can be applied in the MASW method. Implementation of the autojuggie in very shallow MASW surveys could drastically reduce the time required and costs incurred in such surveys. ?? 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

## Citation Information
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1521. ANTOINE v. ANTOINE.

This case was docketed by this Court on February 28, 2019. Appellant’s brief

and enumerations of error were due on March 20, 2019. As of the date of this order,

Appellant has not filed a brief and enumerations of error and has not requested an

extension of time in which to do so.

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as abandoned pursuant to

Court of Appeals Rules 13 and 23.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

March 25, 2019

03/25/2019
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 DIVISION: Miami

In re: Case No. 19-19586-AJC

Chapter 13

VANESSA OCASIO-FUENTES

Debtor(s) /

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the Debtor’s 1

st Amended Plan, D.E. #22, was served via 

U.S. Mail on all parties identified on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit “A” on 

September 9, 2019.

/s/ Matthew E. Mazur, Jr., Esq.

Matthew E. Mazur, Jr., Esq.

FBN: 0144614

Address 2645 Executive Park Drive, Suite 110

Weston, FL, 33331

Phone (305) 466-3328

Email: mmazurjr@mazur-law.com

Dated: 9-17-19

Case 19-19586-AJC Doc 25 Filed 09/17/19 Page 1 of 2
 Label Matrix for local noticing Synchrony Bank Citibank 

 113C-1 PRA Receivables Management, LLC Attn: Recovery/Centralized Bankruptcy 

 Case 19-19586-AJC PO Box 41021 POB 790034 

 Southern District of Florida Norfolk, VA 23541-1021 St Louis, MO 63179-0034 

 Miami 

 Sun Sep 8 16:27:46 EDT 2019 

 Internal Revenue Service Loancare Loancare 

 POB 7346 Attn: Customer Service POB 37628 

 Philadelphia, PA 19101-7346 POB 8068 Philadelphia, PA 19101-0628 

 Virginia Beach, VA 23450-8068 

 

 Myrna Varela Espinoza Navy Federal Credit Union Nissan Motor Acceptance 

 780 NE 119th Street Attn: Bankruptcy Dept POB 660366 

 Biscayne Park, FL 33161-6359 POB 3000 Dallas, TX 75266-0366 

 Merrifield, VA 22119-3000 

 Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp Office of the US Trustee 

 POB 660360 POB 660577 51 S.W. 1st Ave. 

 Dallas, TX 75266-0360 Dallas, TX 75266-0577 Suite 1204 

 Miami, FL 33130-1614 

 Synchrony Bank / Mattress Firm United Wholesale Mortgage, ISOA Matthew Mazur Jr 

 Attn: Bankruptcy 585 South Blvd. Matthew Mazur, P.A. 

 POB 965060 Pontiac, MI 48341-3163 2645 Executive Park Drive 

 Orlando, FL 32896-5060 Suite 110 

 Weston, FL 33331-3624 

 

 Nancy K. Neidich Vanessa Ocasio-Fuentes 

 www.ch13miami.com 17 Dolphin Road 

 POB 279806 Key Largo, FL 33037-2912 

 Miramar, FL 33027-9806 

 The following recipients may be/have been bypassed for notice due to an undeliverable (u) or duplicate (d) address. 

 (u)Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC. (u)Miami End of Label Matrix 

 Mailable recipients 16 

 Bypassed recipients 2 

 Total 18 

EXHIBIT A

Case 19-19586-AJC Doc 25 Filed 09/17/19 Page 2 of 2
# L_2005051DE.01002802.xml

| 24.2.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 51/28

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2095/2004 der Kommission vom 8. Dezember 2004 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 581/2004 zur Eröffnung einer Dauerausschreibung für Ausfuhrerstattungen für bestimmte Arten von Butter und der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 582/2004 zur Eröffnung einer Dauerausschreibung für Ausfuhrerstattungen für Magermilchpulver

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 362 vom 9. Dezember 2004
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 362 vom 9. Dezember 2004

Seite 14, Artikel 1, geänderter Absatz 1 Buchstabe a):

anstatt:

| „a) | natürliche Butter der Erzeugniscodes ex ex 0405 10 19 9500 und ex ex 0405 10 19 9700 kuuluva in Blöcken mit einem Nettogewicht von 20 kg oder mehr,“ |
| --- | --- |

„a)

natürliche Butter der Erzeugniscodes ex ex 0405 10 19 9500 und ex ex 0405 10 19 9700 kuuluva in Blöcken mit einem Nettogewicht von 20 kg oder mehr,“

muss es heißen:

| „a) | natürliche Butter der Erzeugniscodes ex ex 0405 10 19 9500 und ex ex 0405 10 19 9700 in Blöcken mit einem Nettogewicht von 20 kg oder mehr,“. |
| --- | --- |

„a)

natürliche Butter der Erzeugniscodes ex ex 0405 10 19 9500 und ex ex 0405 10 19 9700 in Blöcken mit einem Nettogewicht von 20 kg oder mehr,“.

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3667 

To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 

Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2012 

Ms. MIKULSKI (for herself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 as the Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA. 

4 The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN MARRIED INDIVIDUALS’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with
Jeremy JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1846

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 10, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary



 Exhibit 10.36 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary 
 MCG Capital Corporation’s (the “Company’s”) non-employee directors are currently: (i) A. Hugh Ewing, III; (ii) Kim D. Kelly; (iii) Wallace B. Millner, III;
(iv) Kenneth J. O’Keefe; and (v) Gavin Saitowitz. The compensation structure for the Company’s non-employee directors is as follows: 
 AWARD OF RESTRICTED STOCK UPON APPOINTMENT OR ELECTION 

The SEC has granted an order authorizing us to award restricted shares of our common stock to our non-employee directors. Under the Amended and Restated
2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, which we refer to as the 2006 Director Plan, non-employee directors each receive an award of 7,500 shares of restricted stock at the beginning of each three-year term of service on our board of
directors. Forfeiture provisions lapse as to one-third of the awarded shares each year over the three-year term. Awards of restricted stock under the 2006 Director Plan are automatic and may not be changed without further approval from the SEC.

 PAYMENT OF RETAINER FEE; CHAIR AND
COMMITTEE FEES; REIMBURSEMENT OF TRAVEL AND OTHER EXPENSES 
 During the year ended December 31, 2011, each non-employee director received an annual retainer of $85,000 for his or her service on our board of directors. Additional amounts were paid as follows:

  

					
	 Position
	  	Additional Fees	 
	 Non-Employee Chairman of the Board*
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Audit Committee and Investment and Valuation Committee Chairs
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairs
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Investment and Valuation Committee
Members (in addition to fees paid for service as Non-Employee Chairman of the Board for service as Committee chairs)
	  	$	10,000/Committee	  

  

	*	Richard W. Neu served as the non-employee Chairman of the Board until October 31, 2011 when he was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.


 All retainer amounts were paid quarterly during Fiscal 2011 in arrears. Non-employee directors also received reimbursement for
reasonable travel and other expenses in connection with attending meetings of our board of directors during Fiscal 2011.
# memo

The ECA Incineration Testing Program: Laboratory

- Scale Incineration Testing of Fluoropolymers was completed on October 30, 2009. The final study report associated with this effort consisted of about 3,900 pages of main report body pages and the associated supp orting appendice s. The central conclusion of this study was that Phase II combustion testing of Fluoropolymer Composites 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the laboratory

- scale thermal reactor system determined that waste incineration of fluoropolymers does
not emit detectable levels of PFOA under conditions representative of typical municipal waste combustor operations in the U.S. Based on this testing, waste incineration of fluoropolymers is not expected to be a source
of PFOA in the environment.

Both Phase I and Phase II testing de scribed in the Final Study Report were performed in accordance with the requirements of the Enforceable Consent Agreement (ECA) and the TSCA GLPs as embodied in the EPA

approved Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs). Upon review of the report and append ices, EPA did find eight areas that required additional technical clarification from the test sponsors. These areas have been discussed with Philip Taylor, the Study Director, and Robert Giraud, the Technical Projec t Manager/Facility Management. To: Nhan Nguyen , RAD Branch Chief

From: [Your name]

Date: 3/4/2015

Re: Close

- Out of Technical Matters associated with the ECA Incineration Testing Program: Laboratory

- Scale Incineration Testing of Fluoropolymers

# memo

Satisfac tory responses to all eight areas ha ve been obtained. These topics
and th eir responses are detailed in the file s “ Responses to EPA Review of Fluoropolymers Final Study Report 07

- 11

- 2013 .pdf ” and “ Responses to EPA Review of Fluoropolymers Final Study Repor t 03

- 02

- 2015.pdf .”
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Landslides caused by the Klamath Falls, Oregon, earthquakes of September 20, 1993      

      January 1, 1993    

The Klamath Falls earthquakes caused landslides throughout an area of about 420 sq km and as far as about 29 km from the epicenter, a distribution that is typical for magnitude 6 earthquakes (see graphs on following pages). Most of the landslides were rock falls or shallow, highly disrupted rock slides from roadcuts, quarries, and steep bluff faces. Such landslides are also among the most common types caused by other earthquakes of comparable magnitude. 

In the Klamath Falls area, the most numerous earthquake-induced rock falls were along the east-to southeast-facing flank of a ridge immediately south and west of Howard Bay (locality 1 on the accompanying map), 18 km east-southeast of the epicenter of the magntiude 6.0 shock at 10:45 p.m. This ridge is more than 240 m high and has slopes steeper than 45° in places. The upper part of the ridge is composed of material from basaltic lava flows, an the lower slopes are covered with colluvium and talus deposits containing abundant boulders. 

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Klamath Falls
                  - Oregon

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 33 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 33

   To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as 
                              wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
 Udall of Colorado, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Udall of New 
  Mexico, Mr. Cardin, Ms. Cantwell, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. 
Leahy, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Wyden, 
and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
     and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as 
                              wilderness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PORTION OF ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AS 
              WILDERNESS.

    Section 4 of the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act 
of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(p) Designation of Certain Land as Wilderness.--Notwithstanding 
any other provision of this Act, a portion of the Arctic National 
Wildlife Refuge in Alaska comprising approximately 1,559,538 acres, as 
generally depicted on a map entitled `Arctic National Wildlife Refuge--
1002 Area. Alternative E--Wilderness Designation, October 28, 1991' and 
available for inspection in the offices of the Secretary, is designated 
as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System under the 
Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
Form ATYHRG

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 19−22760−RAM

Chapter: 13

In re:

Lazaro Valle Molina

10380 SW 212 St #201

Miami FL 33189

SSN: XXX−XX−5690

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held on 12/10/2019 at 09:00AM at the following location:

C. Clyde Atkins U.S. Courthouse, 301 N Miami Ave Courtroom 4 (RAM), Miami, FL 33128

to consider the following:

[25] Objection to Claim of FreedomRoad Financial [# 9], Filed by Debtor Lazaro Valle Molina (Cordero,

Patrick)

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN SET ON THE COURT'S MOTION CALENDAR FOR A NON−EVIDENTIARY

HEARING. THE ALLOTTED TIME FOR THIS MATTER IS TEN MINUTES.

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and shall

file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party who fails

to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities. Electronic

devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras), iPads, tablets,

pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are not permitted in

the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for cameras not

integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar identification card,

attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses subpoenaed to appear in

a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited electronic device into a

federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge and verified by the United

States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 11/21/2019

By: Patrick L Cordero

Case 19-22760-RAM Doc 26 Filed 11/21/19 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 12, 2022 No. 04-22-00119-CR Timothy Cantu DEL RIO , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR5483 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief was originally due August 10, 2022. On August 15, 2022, counsel for appellant moved for a thirty-day extension to September 9, 2022. The motion was granted. On September 9, 2022, appellant’s counsel sought a second extension of time, to October 10, 2022. On September 12, 2022, this court granted the motion. Counsel was cautioned that the court does not ordinarily grant extensions of more than sixty days beyond the original due date. 4 TH T EX
. A PP . (San Antonio) LOC. R. 8, Notes and Comments. On October 12, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed a motion for a third extension of time to file appellant’s brief, requesting until November 9, 2022. The motion is granted in part

. We orderCathy S. Compton to file appellant’s brief by November 8, 2022 . Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion, filed by the date the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance. If the brief or a conforming motion is not filed by the date ordered, the court may abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or his counsel has abandoned the appeal.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court