alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the   accompanying   Quarterly   Report  of  Dazzling
Investments,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Gloria Eck,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  and I, Amy  Hadley,  Treasurer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company,  hereby  certifies for the purpose of complying  with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange  Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: May 31, 2005                       By: /s/ GLORIA ECK
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Gloria Eck
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          and Director

Dated: May 31, 2005                       By: /s/ AMY HADLEY
                                          ______________________________________
                                          Amy Hadley
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                          Officer and Director



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DAZZLING INVESTMENTS, INC., AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY DAZZLING INVESTMENTS, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 6 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 7 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 8 of 9
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 9 of 9
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DEAN PODSTUPKA, SR. and MARCIA )

PODSTUPKA, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1169

)

T D BANK, N.A., )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 3, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Highlands 

County; Larry Helms, Judge.

Dean Podstupka, Sr. and Marcia 

Podstupka, pro se.

Danielle Rundlett Burns of Duane Morris 

LLP, Boca Raton, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, VILLANTI, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
      to
      the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




/s/
                  Ron
                  RuskowskyRon
                  RuskowskyChief
                    Executive Officer
 Date: August 14,
        2007
# EUR-Lex - 32004R1211 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R1211

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1211/2004 of 30 June 2004 fixing the production refund on white sugar used in the chemical industry for the period from 1 to 31 July 2004 **

*
Official Journal L 232 , 01/07/2004 P. 0013 - 0014 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1211/2004 of 30 June 2004 fixing the production refund on white sugar used in the chemical industry for the period from 1 to 31 July 2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector(1), and in particular the fifth indent of Article 7(5) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Pursuant to Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, production refunds may be granted on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) and (f) of that Regulation, on syrups listed in Article 1(1)(d) thereof and on chemically pure fructose covered by CN code 17025000 as an intermediate product, that are in one of the situations referred to in Article 23(2) of the Treaty and are used in the manufacture of certain products of the chemical industry.

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1265/2001 of 27 June 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 as regards granting the production refund on certain sugar products used in the chemical industry(2) provides that these refunds shall be determined according to the refund fixed for white sugar.

(3) Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1265/2001 provides that the production refund on white sugar is to be fixed at monthly intervals commencing on the first day of each month.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The production refund on white sugar referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1265/2001 shall be equal to EUR 43,062/100 kg net for the period from 1 to 31 July 2004 .

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2004 .

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2004 .

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 63.
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40679 C onfer enc e Cal endar
GEORGE HARRY DAVI S , J R Pet i t i o ne r - Appe l l ant

v. FR AN CI SCO Q U I N TA N A, W ar de n R espon den t
- A pp el l ee

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 1: 06- C V

- 721

B ef ore SM ITH , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * G eorge H arry D avis , Jr. , federal pri soner # 082 60-078, app eal s t h e di st ri ct court’ s di sm i ssa l o f h i s 28 U
. S
. C
. § 2241 peti t i on as r epeti t i ou s. Th e di st ri ct
c our tal som ade a l t er nat ive f i n d i n gs reg a rd i n g D a vis’ s p eti ti on , det er m i ni ng t hat D a v is ’s a ll e g a t io n s w e r e in s u ff ic ie n tto s u p p o r t a c la im u n d e r 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 5 ’s
s av i ngs c l aus e a nd t hatD av i s w as no te nt i t l e d t o i nj unc t ive r e l i e f und e rt he Privac y Act , 5 U
. S. C
. § 552a. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 16, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 40679

2 A l t hough D avi s c hal l enges t he di st r i c tc our t ’ s al t er nat ive f i ndi ngs, h e has fai l ed t o c hal l enge t he di st ri ct co urt ’ s pri m ar y de t er m i nat i on t hathi s § 2 241 pe t i t i o n was r e pe t i t i o us . Al t ho ugh p r o s e b r i e fs a r e a f f o r de d l ibe r alc o ns t r uc t i o n, Haines v. K

erner , 404 U
. S
. 519 , 520 ( 197 2) , even pro se l i t i gan t s m u st b ri ef
a r g u m e n ts in o r d e r to p r e s e r v e th e m . Y oh ey v. Col l i ns , 985 F. 2d 222, 224- 25 ( 5t h Ci r . 19 93 )
. Fai l ur e t o i de nt i f y an e r r o r i n t he di s t r i c t c o ur t ’ s ana l ys i s i s t he
s a m e a s if D a v is h a dn o t a p p e a le dth e ju d g m e n t. Se eBr i nkm ann v . D al las Cou n ty D epu ty S h erif f A bn er , 8 1 3 F .2d 7 4 4 , 7 4 8 (5t h C ir. 1 9 8 7 ). Thi s c o ur tm ay aff

i r m t he di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s de ni alo f r e l i e f o n a ny gr o und
s u p p o r te db yth e re c o r d
. S ee S cot tv. Joh n son , 2 2 7 F .3d 2 6 0 , 2 6 2 (5 th C ir. 2 0 0 0 ). B e c a u s e D a v is h a s fa ile d to c h a lle n g e th e d is tr ic t co u r t’s d e te r m in a tio n th a t h is p e tit io n w a s re p e tit io u s , D a v is is n o t e n tit le dt o r e lie f. S ee Bri nkm ann , 813 F. 2d
a t 7 4 8 ; S co tt , 227 F. 3d at262. Ac c o r d i n g l y , t h e j u d g me n to f t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Investigation of trends in flooding in the Tug Fork basin of Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia      

      January 1, 1982    

View Document

Statistical analysis indicates that the average size of annual flood peaks of the Tug Fork (West Virginia and Kentucky) has been increasing. However, additional statistical analysis does not indicate that flood levels exceeded typically once or twice a year in the period 1947-1979 are any more likely to be exceeded now than in 1947. Possible trends in stream-channel size are also investigated at three locations. No discernable trends in channel size are noted. Further statistical analysis of the trend in the size of annual flood peaks shows that much of the annual variation is related to nearby rainfall and to the "natural" hydrologic response in a relatively undisturbed sub-basin. However, some statistical indication of trend persists after accounting for these natural factors, though the indication is of borderline statistical significance. This suggests the need for further study in the basin that may relate flood magnitudes to both rainfall and to land use.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Robert M Hirsch

##### Research Hydrologist Emeritus

Water Resources Mission Area

rhirsch@usgs.gov

703-648-5888

## Related Content

#### Robert M Hirsch

##### Research Hydrologist Emeritus

Water Resources Mission Area

rhirsch@usgs.gov

703-648-5888

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Tug Fork basin
                  - Kentucky
                  -  Virginia
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           International phase of ocean drilling: Seismic Line 1 demultiplexed data, Cape Hatteras to Mid-Atlantic Ridge      

      January 1, 1994    

View Report

Introduction

This CD-ROM is part of a 39 disc collection containing the demultiplexed seismic data from a 3400 km-long multichannel seismic-reflection profile extending from Cape Hatteras, N.C., to the rift valley of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. The data were collected in 1974 as part of the International Phase of Ocean Drilling (IPOD) which was jointly funded by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the National Science Foundation's Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP).

## Citation Information

### Study Area
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (22,306)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,306)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32004R1216 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R1216

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1216/2004 of 30 June 2004 fixing the derived intervention prices for white sugar for the 2004/05 marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 232 , 01/07/2004 P. 0025 - 0025 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1216/2004 of 30 June 2004 fixing the derived intervention prices for white sugar for the 2004/05 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector(1), and in particular Article 2(4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 fixes the intervention price for white sugar for non-deficit areas at EUR 631.9 per tonne for the 2001/02 to 2005/06 marketing years.

(2) Article 2(1)(b) of that Regulation provides that derived intervention prices for white sugar are to be fixed for each deficit area each year. When those prices are fixed, account is to be taken of the regional variations in the price of sugar, which, given a normal harvest and free movement of sugar, may be expected to occur under natural conditions of price formation on the market and in view of experience gained and the costs of transporting sugar from surplus areas to deficit areas.

(3) To establish whether an area is a deficit area, projections should be made on the basis of the data returned by the Member States relating both to the current marketing year as regards consumption trends, and to the prospects for the coming marketing year as regards developments in available production. As a result, areas should be recognised as deficit areas only where the projections clearly indicate that a deficit is likely to occur.

(4) On this basis, the areas of production in Greece, Spain, Ireland and the United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal and Finland are likely to be deficit areas.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The derived intervention prices for white sugar in the deficit areas of the Community for the 2004/05 marketing year shall be:

(a) EUR 655,30 per tonne for all areas in Greece;

(b) EUR 648,80 per tonne for all areas in Spain;

(c) EUR 646,50 per tonne for all areas in Ireland and the United Kingdom;

(d) EUR 655,30 per tonne for all areas in Italy;

(e) EUR 646,50 per tonne for all areas in Portugal;

(g) EUR 646,50 per tonne for all areas in Finland.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2004 .

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2004 .

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9520]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than May 12, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Jessie Doyle Buffinton; Helmut Hans Cawthon; Kenneth Franklin 
Davis; Andrew Charles Heaner; Clinton Gray Hubbard; Stephen Curtis 
Klasson; Kimberly Gill Mauer; Laura Hallin Mumber; Matthew Peter 
Mumber; Delos Harley Yancey, III; John Demetrius Xanthos, all of Rome, 
Georgia; Andrew Charles Heaner, Atlanta, Georgia; and Wayne Elm Vick, 
Armuchee, Georgia; collectively to acquire additional voting shares of 
Heritage First Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
additional voting shares of Heritage First Bank, both of Rome, Georgia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Terry L. Bunnell, individually and in concert with Deborah L. 
Bunnell, both of Glasgow, Kentucky; to acquire control of Peoples--
Marion Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of The 
Peoples Bank, both of Marion, Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 22, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-9520 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Appendix M

Class I Areas AOI Contribution Spreadsheets
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

GABRIEL MANUEL LUCERO, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 22-2018 

(D.C. No. 2:19-CR-00138-KG-1) 

(D. N.M.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before PHILLIPS, MURPHY, and ROSSMAN, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

This matter is before us on the parties’ Joint Motion to Vacate Oral Argument, 

Vacate Judgment, and Remand for Further Proceedings. Upon careful consideration, 

the joint motion is GRANTED as follows. 

The March 23, 2023 oral argument in this matter is VACATED, and all 

counsel are excused from attendance. This matter is REMANDED to the district 

court with instructions to (1) vacate its judgment and sentence, (2) consider whether 

the United States’ concession regarding the invalidity of the state cellphone search 

*

 In light of the parties’ joint motion, oral argument is not necessary, and this 

matter is submitted on the briefs. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law 

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its 

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

March 22, 2023

Christopher M. Wolpert 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 22-2018 Document: 010110831195 Date Filed: 03/22/2023 Page: 1
2 

warrant affects the district court’s ruling that the 67-day delay in obtaining the 

federal search warrant was reasonable, and (3) conduct any other proceedings that it 

deems necessary or advisable to bring this case to a conclusion. 

The Clerk shall issue the mandate forthwith. 

Entered for the Court, 

Per Curiam 

Appellate Case: 22-2018 Document: 010110831195 Date Filed: 03/22/2023 Page: 2
|   | 1. | The      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,      2008, to which      this          Certification      is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of      the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the      Company for the period covered by the Periodic  Report. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/    | Peter A. Michel              |   | /s/    | Lincoln Zehr                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |                         |   |   |                         |   |
|   | Peter      A. Michel         |   |   | Lincoln      Zehr            |   |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----