alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,630
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,730)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (21,555)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,555)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10014 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CHRISTOPHER RASHAD TEAL , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 173

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Christopher Rashad Teal pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin. He now appeals, challenging the procedural and substantive reasonableness of the above

- guidelines 298

- month sentence of imprisonment imposed by the district court. We affirm. First, Teal’s alternative interpretation s of the record evi dence are insufficient to demonstrate that the district court clearly erred in determining

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under t he limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 31, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10014 Document: 00515181534 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2019No. 19

- 10014

2 the quantity of cocaine and heroin for the purpose of calculating his guidelines

range. See United States v. Harris , 740 F.3d 956, 966

- 67 (5th Cir. 2014). Second, his unpreserved challenge to the sufficiency of the district court’s consideration of the sentencing factors and explanation of the above

- guidelines sentence fails on review for plain error. See United States v. Churchwell , 807 F.3d 107, 122

- 23 (5th Cir. 2015). Third, we are unpersuaded that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. McElwee , 646 F.3d 328, 343 (5th Cir. 2011). AFFIRMED. Case: 19-10014 Document: 00515181534 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2019
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2005072EN.01005001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 72/50 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2004/115/EC of 15 December 2004 amending Council Directive 90/642/EEC as regards the maximum levels for certain pesticide residues fixed therein

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 374 of 22 December 2004](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_374_R_TOC)
)

On page 67, in the Annex, (v) BERRIES AND SMALL FRUIT:

for:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(a) | | | | | --- | --- | | | Table and wine grapes | | | | | --- | --- | | | Table and wine grapes | | | | | --- | --- | | | Table grapes’, | |

read:

| | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘(a) | | | | | --- | --- | | | Table and wine grapes | | | | | --- | --- | | | Table grapes | | | | | --- | --- | | | Wine grapes’. | |

---
Exhibit 10-1





Exhibit 10.1




TERMINATION AGREEMENT




This Agreement is made and entered into effective as of the 1st day of September,
2011 by and between Delta Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Delta”), and Amber
Resources Company of Colorado, a Delaware corporation (“Amber”).



WHERAEAS, Delta and Amber are parties to that certain Agreement executed effective October 1,
1998 providing, in essence, that subsequent to October 1, 1998 all management-related and general
and administrative costs of Amber and Delta, except direct costs for LOE’s, royalties, and similar
company specific items, shall be borne by Delta and for which Amber shall pay Delta $25,000 on a
quarterly basis (the “Management Agreement”); and



WHEREAS, Delta and Amber wish to terminate the Management Agreement effective September 1,
2011;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts and the mutual covenants recited herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,
the Management Agreement is hereby terminated in its entirety effective September 1, 2011 and shall
be of no further force or effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Delta and Amber have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the
date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Delta Petroleum Corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

By:

	 	
 

Kevin K. Nanke, Chief Financial Officer
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Amber Resources Company of Colorado	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
By:

	 	
 

Kevin K. Nanke, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Wednesday, May 6, 2009.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: DCIO Risk Surveillance.

Contact Person For More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-9700 Filed 4-24-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Christopher H. Hopkins, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oilsands Quest Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andhave: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions containedin SEC Release 34-47986] (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors; (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        March 14, 2008 /s/ Christopher H. Hopkins   Christopher H. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 6, 2009, Archimica, 
Inc., 2460 W. Bennett Street, Springfield, Missouri 65807-1229, made 
application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Lisdexamfetamine (1205), a 
basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance in 
bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than June 29, 2009.

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9801 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# C_2004174EN.01000501.xml

| 6.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3398 — HEWLETT PACKARD / TRIATON)

(2004/C 174/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 March 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3398. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3398. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0134 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0134

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 134/2004 of 27 January 2004 fixing the standard fee per farm return for the 2004 accounting year of the farm accountancy data network **

*
Official Journal L 021 , 28/01/2004 P. 0008 - 0008 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 134/2004

of 27 January 2004

fixing the standard fee per farm return for the 2004 accounting year of the farm accountancy data network

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community(1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 of 13 July 1983 on certain detailed implementing rules concerning the keeping of accounts for the purpose of determining the incomes of agricultural holdings(2), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 provides that a standard fee shall be paid by the Commission to the Member States for each duly completed farm return forwarded to it within the period prescribed in Article 3 of that Regulation.

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 113/2003(3) fixed the amount of the standard fee for the 2003 accounting year at EUR 138 per farm return. The trend in costs and its effects on the cost of completing the farm return justify a revision of the fee.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard fee provided for in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 shall be fixed at EUR 140.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply for the 2004 accounting year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859/65. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2059/2003 (OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 1).

(2) OJ L 190, 14.7.1983, p. 25.

(3) OJ L 18, 23.1.2003, p. 3.
# C_2004222EN.01000501.xml

| 4.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3518 — LACTALIS/GRUPO PRADO CERVERA/CENTRAL LECHERA VALLISOLETANA)

(2004/C 222/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3518. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3518. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-36282 and No.
333-134275 on Form S-8 of Rome Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated March 2, 2009
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports
appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rome Bancorp, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2008.

|                |                     
|--------------- | --------------------
|                | /S/Crowe Horwath LLP
|                |                     
|                | Crowe
 Horwath LLP  
|               
|Cleveland, Ohio
|March 6, 2009  

---
___________ No. 96-2649

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Bruce Raymond Swinton, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 5, 1996 Filed: September 11, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In United States v. Swinton , 75 F.3d 374 (8th Cir. 1996), we af firmed on all issues but remanded this case for an evid entiary hearing on a claim of possible jury misc onduct. The district court conducted a thorough and full hearing on that issue and found that no such misconduct occurred. Th e district court in conformity with its findings d enied Swinton a new trial. Swinton appeals. We have considered the matter and reviewed the record as well as the Anders brief filed by Swinton's appointed counsel. We conc lude that Swinton's appeal is without merit. We affirm th e order of the district court denying a new trial.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





August
14, 2009





In
connection with the Interim Report of Ohio Legacy Corp (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the periods covered in the
Report.





By:
              /s/ D. Michael Kramer
              
              By:
              /s/ Vanessa M. RichardsD.
      Michael Kramer
              
              
              Vanessa
      M. RichardsPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
              
              
              Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Derek Ivany                    |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Derek Ivany                              |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  February 22, 2010                        |

|   By: |   /s/ Victor Cantore                 |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Victor Cantore                           |
|  Title:    |  Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  February 22, 2010                        |
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson               
|                       |  |  |  | Rodger L. Johnson                   
|                       |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ex10_19.htm


Exhibit 10.19












2012 INCENTIVE PLAN FOR CERTAIN KEY EMPLOYEES







The Company has a discretionary annual incentive program under which exempt salaried employees may earn cash payments based on a percentage of base annual salary.  The actual percent is based on a variety of guidelines including performance levels of the respective business units primarily measured by operating income subject to certain adjustments.







The payment to an employee is based upon (i) their assigned grade level, (ii) actual company earnings achieved relative to a pre-determined target, which is adjusted upward if company performance exceeds target and reduced if company performance is less than target, and (iii) base salary paid during the fiscal year.