alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6094
VICKER GARDINER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-95-1482-AM) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 4, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vicker Gardiner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Gardiner v. Virginia , No. CA-95-1482-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 1995). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 

400 7th Street, SW, Room PL-400 Washington, DC 20590-0001 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Request an extension to Exemption Number 9695 (Regulatory Docket Number 

FAA-2007-28302) granted to the Department of the Army. This exemption from 

5 105.17 and 105.1 9 (a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

permits the United States Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) to conduct 

day and unlighted night (sunset to sunrise) parachute operations, through clouds, 

outside of restricted areas, at or below 1,500'feet above ground level (AGL). These operations are to be conducted in Class C, D or E airspace. The conditions under 

which the current exemption was granted remain in effect. 

For questions regarding this request, contact Mr. Barney Owens at (703) 806-4865 

or Ms. Sydney Tutein at (703) 806-4863. 

Sincerely, -& obert T. Hess 

Colonel, US Army 

Commanding
Exhibit 10.4 Personal Line of Credit Agreement


Exhibit 10.4
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3480 

To provide end user exemptions from certain provisions of the Commodity 

Exchange Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2012 

Mr. JOHANNS (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. TESTER, Mr. KOHL, Mr. 

TOOMEY, and Mrs. HAGAN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide end user exemptions from certain provisions of 

the Commodity Exchange Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MARGIN REQUIREMENTS. 

4 (a) REQUIREMENTS.— 

5 (1) COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT AMEND6 MENT.—Section 4s(e) of the Commodity Exchange 

7 Act (7 U.S.C. 6s(e)), as added by section 731 of the 

8 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer ProVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:43 Aug 07, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3480.IS S3480

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3480 IS

1 tection Act, is amended by adding at the end the fol2 lowing new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(4) APPLICABILITY WITH RESPECT TO

4 COUNTERPARTIES.—The requirements of paragraphs 

5 (2)(A)(ii) and (2)(B)(ii) shall not apply to a swap in 

6 which a counterparty qualifies for an exception 

7 under section 2(h)(7)(A) or satisfies the criteria in 

8 section 2(h)(7)(D).’’. 

9 (2) SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT AMEND10 MENT.—Section 15F(e) of the Securities Exchange 

11 Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o–10(e)), as added by sec12 tion 764(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

13 and Consumer Protection Act, is amended by adding 

14 at the end the following new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(4) APPLICABILITY WITH RESPECT TO

16 COUNTERPARTIES.—The requirements of paragraphs 

17 (2)(A)(ii) and (2)(B)(ii) shall not apply to a secu18 rity-based swap in which a counterparty qualifies for 

19 an exception under section 3C(g)(1) or satisfies the 

20 criteria in section 3C(g)(4).’’. 

21 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The amendments made by 

22 this section to the Commodity Exchange Act shall be im23 plemented— 

24 (1) without regard to— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3480 IS

1 (A) chapter 35 of title 44, United States 

2 Code; and 

3 (B) the notice and comment provisions of 

4 section 553 of title 5, United States Code; 

5 (2) through the promulgation of an interim 

6 final rule, pursuant to which public comment will be 

7 sought before a final rule is issued; and 

8 (3) such that paragraph (1) shall apply solely 

9 to changes to rules and regulations, or proposed 

10 rules and regulations, that are limited to and di11 rectly a consequence of such amendments. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 27, 2021

No. 04-20-00562-CV

James D. SCUDDAY,

Appellant

v.

Austin KING, Tierra Linda Ranch Homeowners Association, Jerry Adams, Bob Dockey, Mary 

La France, Tammy Haney, Denise Chambers and Dimas Lopez,

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14446

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

On December 10, 2021, this court issued a letter denying “all requests for oral argument” 

and informing the parties that this appeal would be submitted on briefs on January 11, 2022 

before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, and 

Justice Beth Watkins. On December 16, 2021, appellant filed a motion seeking reconsideration 

of the court’s decision to deny oral argument. After consideration, we DENY appellant’s motion.

It is so ORDERED December 27, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Quick-Med
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Nam H. Nguyen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
 
 (a)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
  (b)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:  September
29,
2008                                                                                     /s/ Nam H.
Nguyen
 Nam H. Nguyen
 Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Craig Crawford certify that:

          1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
The Project Group, Inc.;

          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

               a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

               b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

               c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
          5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
               a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

               b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 18, 2003

/s/ CRAIG CRAWFORD
-------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

DeBerry 3 Operating Company, LLC, 

Appellant

No. 06-15-00036-CV v.

Quitman Independent School District, et al., 

Appellees

Appeal from the 402nd Judicial District 

Court of Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

T-3625). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss 

and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, DeBerry 3 Operating Company, LLC, pay all costs of 

this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 24, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Monique van Oord, Chief Financial Officer of Linux Gold
  Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for
  the year ended February 28, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
  78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of Linux Gold Corp.

|Richmond, BC, Canada |                                               
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------
|                     | by: /s/ Monique van Oord                      
|August 22, 2005      |                                               
|                     | Monique van Oord
      Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold
  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---
EPA

– PCA Meeting

Thursday, September 15, 2011

EPA Office, RTP, NC

12:30

– 2:30 p.m. EDT

Tentative Meeting Agenda

Dial In: (888) 387

‐ 8686, then 4089494

1) Introductions

2) Review/Discuss Proposed Issue Recommendations

a) Clinker Piles (PCA 9/7/11 Submittal, Potential Stay)

b) Modifications to the Total Hydrocarbon Standard

c) HCl Monitoring During Start

‐ up and Shutdown

d) HCl Continuous Emission Monitors Associated with Dry Scrubbers

e) Alternative Particulate Matter (PM) Equation

f) Continuous Monitoring of PM and Mercury During Start

‐ up and Shutdown

g) Regulatory Status of Various Coal Mill Configurations

h) PM Limit for Modified Sources Under the NSPS

3) Schedule for Making Rule Changes

4) Other Business

5) Adjourn
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Rodger L. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Knology, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knology, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |     |                                                                    
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Michael R. Long                                                
| |     | Michael R. Long
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 27, 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE 4TH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

CAUSE NUMBER 04-20-00441-CV

R.C., APPELLANT

V.

Texas Department of Family Protective Services, APPELLEE

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF FEES DUE

TO INDIGENCY

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(c)(1), Appellant R.C.

files this Request for Waiver of Fees Due to Indigency and would show the Court:

1. Appellant duly filed her Affidavit of Indigency with the trial court on 

December 18, 2018, before the Notice of Appeal in this case was filed.

2. Said Affidavit of Indigency is attached to this Request for Waiver of Fees 

Due to Indigency.

Respectfully submitted,

By: ---Elizabeth A. Settle------- 

Elizabeth A. Settle

State Bar ID Number: 18044250

1107 Austin Hwy., PO Box 6465

San Antonio, Texas 78209

Telephone: 210-248-7371

Facsimile: 210-820-0256

Trial Attorney for Appellant

ACCEPTED

04-20-00441-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

9/16/2020 3:30 PM

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/16/2020 3:30:16 PM MICHAEL A. CRUZ Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on September 16, 2020 a true and correct copy of Appellant's 

Request for Waiver of Fees Due to Indigency was served by efile on all attorneys 

of record.

----Elizabeth A. Settle-----

Elizabeth A. Settle
Automated Certificate of eService

This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.

The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system

on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing

certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a

certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Envelope ID: 46299385

Status as of 9/16/2020 3:33 PM CST

Associated Case Party: Texas Department of Family Protective Services

Name

Mildred Hohensee

BarNumber Email

mildred.hohensee@dfps.state.tx.us

TimestampSubmitted

9/16/2020 3:30:16 PM

Status

SENT
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Lake Bonneville: Geology of northern Utah Valley, Utah      

      January 1, 1953    

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Document

Lake Bonneville was a vast Pleistocene lake that covered 20,000 square miles in northwestern Utah and had a maximum depth of about 1,000 feet. It was a body of water comparable in size to modern Lake Michigan.

Surveys of the unconsolidated deposits in the Lake Bonneville basin utilize the same methods used in studies of hard rocks, namely: separation of the deposits into mappable units and contacts between formations; observations of lateral and vertical changes in lithology; and plotting of these data on the map.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Salt Lake City Main Office          

2329 West Orton CircleWest Valley City, UT84119-2047United States

doleary@usgs.gov

(801) 908-5014

(801) 908-5001

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Northern Utah Valley
                  - Utah

View All **
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5280-N-16]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 1, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration*, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: April 23, 2009.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. E9-9678 Filed 4-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P