alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 - Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
             of 2002

In  connection  with the  filing  of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2005, (the "Report") by Interchange  Financial  Services
Corporation ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:


     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Registrant.


                                  /s/ Anthony S. Abbate
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Anthony S. Abbate
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer


                                  /s/ Charles T. Field
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Charles T. Field
                                  Senior Vice President and CFO
Order entered November 4, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00519-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.V. AND S.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-04-11968

ORDER

To the extent appellant seeks reconsideration of our October 25, 2016 order deferring to 

the submissions panel whether the lost exhibits are necessary to the appeal’s resolution, we 

DENY appellant’s “motion to reconsider order on new trial based on rule 34.6(f) findings.” 

Appellant’s brief on the merits remains due November 28, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Notice of Increase



 Exhibit 10.103 
 February 11, 2008 
 Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent 
 WA1-501-32-37 
 800 5th Avenue, Floor 32 
 Seattle WA 98104 
 Attention: Brenda H. Little 
  

	Re:	Credit Agreement (as amended, modified and supplemented from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) dated as of December 16, 2007 among Epicor Software
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), the Guarantors identified therein, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (in such capacity, the “Administrative
Agent”) 

 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Credit Agreement. 
 The Borrower hereby
notifies the Administrative Agent that pursuant to Section 2.01(c) of the Credit Agreement the Borrower is exercising its right to increase the Aggregate Revolving Commitment by $50 million with additional Revolving Commitments from
banks and other financial institutions that qualify as Eligible Assignees. 
  

			
	 EPICOR SOFTWARE CORPORATION,
 a Delaware
corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ JOHN D. IRELAND

	Name:	 	John D. Ireland
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Exhibit 10.10.3



 Exhibit 10.10.3 

Amendment Agreement Number 2 
  

					
		 		 	 Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
 1585 Broadway
 New York, NY 10036-8293
 Facsimile: (212) 537-8293
 Telephone: (212) 507-0483


 Capital One Financial Corporation 
 1680 Capital One Drive 
 McLean, VA 22102 
 Attention: Simon Fairclough 

			
	 Telephone No.:
	 	703-720-1253
	 Facsimile No.:
	 	703-720-2165

 November 18, 2011 
 Dear Mr. Fairclough: 
 Reference is made to the Share Forward Transaction letter agreement
dated July 14, 2011, as amended and supplemented from time to time (including pursuant to Amendment Agreement Number 1 with respect thereto , dated November 1, 2011), between Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Capital One Financial
Corporation (the “Agreement”). The purpose of this letter agreement (this “Amendment Agreement”) is to amend certain terms set forth in the Agreement as described below. All capitalized terms used, but not defined
herein, shall have the meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, Morgan Stanley and Counterparty hereby agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Settlement Notice Date: Clause (i) of the definition of Settlement Notice Date shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 (i) designated by Counterparty as a Settlement Notice Date by a written notice (a “Settlement
Notice”) delivered via emails to each member of the Settlement Notification Dealer Personnel (as defined below) prior to 11:59 p.m. New York time on the Scheduled Trading Day immediately preceding such Settlement Notice Date which shall
also contain the applicable Settlement Shares and the election of Cash Settlement or Net Share Settlement with respect to such Settlement Shares, if applicable; or 
  

	 	2.	Settlement Notification Dealer Personnel. Settlement Notification Dealer Personnel means: 


 

							
	Jae	 		  	Kang:	  	Jae.Kang@morganstanley.com
	Kerry	 		  	Willoughby:	  	Kerry.Willoughby@morganstanley.com
	Serkan	 		  	Savasoglu:	  	Serkan.Savasoglu@morganstanley.com
	Anthony	 		  	Cicia:	  	Anthony.Cicia@morganstanley.com

  

	 	3.	Counterparts: This Amendment Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original with the same effect as if the signatures
thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 









	 	4.	Governing Law: This Amendment Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 


Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth the terms and conditions of our agreement by executing this Amendment Agreement Number 2. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Serkan Savasoglu

		 	Name: Serkan Savasoglu
		 	Title: Managing Director
	
	Accepted and confirmed as of the Trade Date:
	
	CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen Linehan

		 	Name: Stephen Linehan
		 	Title: EVP, Treasurer
EXHIBIT 31.2I, Karim Hirji, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Oilsands Quest Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andhave: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions containedin SEC Release 34-47986]  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors; (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   March 15, 2007     /s/ Karim Hirji  KarimHirji, Chief Financial Officer
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-20 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989: Earthquake occurrence      

      January 1, 1993    

Professional Paper 1550 seeks to understand the M6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake itself. It examines how the fault that generated the earthquake ruptured, searches for and evaluates precursors that may have indicated an earthquake was coming, reviews forecasts of the earthquake, and describes the geology of the earthquake area and the crustal forces that affect this geology. Some significant findings were:

    * Slip during the earthquake occurred on 35 km of fault at depths ranging from 7 to 20 km. Maximum slip was approximately 2.3 m. The earthquake may not have released all of the strain stored in rocks next to the fault and indicates a potential for another damaging earthquake in the Santa Cruz Mountains in the near future may still exist.

    * The earthquake involved a large amount of uplift on a dipping fault plane. Pre-earthquake conventional wisdom was that large earthquakes in the Bay area occurred as horizontal displacements on predominantly vertical faults.

    * The fault segment that ruptured approximately coincided with a fault segment identified in 1988 as having a 30% probability of generating a M7 earthquake in the next 30 years. This was one of more than 20 relevant earthquake forecasts made in the 83 years before the earthquake.

    * Calculations show that the Loma Prieta earthquake changed stresses on nearby faults in the Bay area. In particular, the earthquake reduced stresses on the Hayward Fault which decreased the frequency of small earthquakes on it.

    * Geological and geophysical mapping indicate that, although the San Andreas Fault can be mapped as a through going fault in the epicentral region, the southwest dipping Loma Prieta rupture surface is a separate fault strand and one of several along this part of the San Andreas that may be capable of generating earthquakes.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Earthquake Hazards Program          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

twoods@usgs.gov

####               Earthquake Science Center          

350 N. Akron RoadMoffett Field, CA94035United States

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00556-CV

Salim MERCHANT,

Appellant

v.

SOUTH TEXAS MERCHANT ASSOCIATION COOPERATIVE, Quest Distributors LLC, 

STMA Business LLC, STMA Properties LLC, Sadruddin Sarfani, Hasam Ali, Mustak Ali, 

Rahim Ali, Saleem Ali Noorallah Dhuka, Alina Jindani, Iqbal Karadiya, Nooru Lalani, Nizarali 

Maredia, Amin P. Mohammad, Amin V. Mohamed, Inayatali Momin, and Ruknuddin Momin,

Appellees

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI14923

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we STRIKE Appellant’s amended brief 

and prohibit Appellant from filing another. This appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF 

PROSECUTION. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed against appellant Salim Merchant.

SIGNED November 21, 2018.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Exhibit 4.1

 

	
Certificate Number
    	
 
    	
Class
    	
 
    	
Number of Shares
    	
 
    	
CUSIP Number
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Ordinary
    	
 
    	
[ · ]
    	
 
    	
GO1767 105
    


 

ALKERMES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

 

Registered in Ireland, Number 498284

 

Registered Office: [ · ]

 

This is to Certify that

 




 

of

 




 

is the registered holder of [ · ] fully paid ordinary shares of US$0.01 each in the above-named Company, subject to the Irish Companies Acts and the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the said Company.

 

The Common Seal of the Company was hereto affixed in the presence of: *

This Certificate was Authorised by: *

 

 

	
Director / Secretary / Authorised Signatory:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
 
    


 

 

NOTE: No transfer of any of the above mentioned shares can be registered until this Certificate has been deposited at the Company’s Registered Office

 




* Delete as appropriate
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modification of 

wiring 14.0 $1,190.0

0

$347 $1,537.00 46 $70,702.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $70,702

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Corrective Action 0.0 $ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Blackhawk Fund, a Nevada
corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Frank Marshik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Frank MarshikFrank
      Marshik,President(Chief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer)August
      23, 2010
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF QUEST SOFTWARE, INC.



|                                         |  |                             
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name                                     |  | Jurisdiction Of Organization
|1397639 Ontario Ltd.                     |  | Ontario, Canada             
|881229 Alberta Ltd.                      |  | Alberta, Canada             
|Fastlane Technologies (UK) Limited       |  | United Kingdom              
|Fastlane Technologies Corporation        |  | Delaware                    
|Fastlane Technologies GmbH               |  | Germany                     
|Active Concepts Pty, Ltd.                |  | Australia                   
|Active Concepts, Inc.                    |  | California                  
|Fresh Dew Investments Limited            |  | British Virgin Islands      
|Murecia Investments Limited              |  | British Virgin Islands      
|Quest Software France SARL               |  | France                      
|Quest Software (UK) Ltd.                 |  | United Kingdom              
|Quest Software Pty., Ltd.                |  | Australia                   
|Q.S.I. Quest Software Israel Limited     |  | Israel                      
|Quest Software Company Limited           |  | Ireland                     
|Quest Software Ireland Limited           |  | Ireland                     
|Quest Software GmbH                      |  | Germany                     
|Quest Holding Company, LLC               |  | California                  
|Quest Softair, Inc.                      |  | California                  
|Quest Software, Ltda                     |  | Brazil                      
|Quest Software Espana, S.A.              |  | Spain                       
|Quest Software Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                      
|Quest Software Nederland B.V.            |  | Netherlands                 
|Quest Norge AS                           |  | Norway                      
|Quest Scandinavia AS                     |  | Denmark                     
|QSFT Svenska AB                          |  | Sweden                      
|Sitraka Corporation                      |  | Minnesota                   
|Quest Software Java Support Centre B.V.  |  | Netherlands                 
|Sitraka Deutschland GmbH                 |  | Germany                     
|Safari Limited Partnership               |  | Canada                      
|Quest Software Canada                    |  | Canada                      
|eCritical Corporation                    |  | California                  
|Discus Data Solutions, Inc.              |  | Delaware                    
|QSI Development Corp.                    |  | Delaware                    
|Quest Acquisition Corp.                  |  | California                  
|Quest Software K.K.                      |  | Japan
AAM-12-217-E 

March 15, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10480 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0153 

Ms. Gayle Wade 

Air Associates of Ks 

12901 West 151 Street, Suite B 

Olathe, KS 66062 

Dear Ms. Wade: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By submission received February 21, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Air Associates of Ks and T & C Aviation Enterprises, Inc. 

(Air Associates/T&C) for an exemption from part 120 to allow Air Associates/T&C, which 

are operating under separate parts of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), to cover 

their safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Air Associates/T&C. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate drug and alcohol testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Air Associates of Ks and T & C Aviation Enterprises, Inc. 

an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Air Associates/T&C, which are 

operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover their safety-sensitive employees 

under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations 

described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Air Associates/T&C are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations 

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Air Associates/T&C part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure