alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004230EN.01000501.xml

| 30.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1198/2004

of 29 June 2004

determining the extent to which applications lodged in June 2004 for import licences for certain poultrymeat products under the regime provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 of 22 June 1994, laying down detailed rules for the application in the poultrymeat sector of the import arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products (1) and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2004 submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2004 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 156, 23.6.1994, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 July to 30 September 2004 | Total quantity available for the period 1 October to 31 December 2004
  (t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1,48 | 1 775,00 |
| 2 | 1,60 | 1 275,00 |
| 3 | 1,55 | 825,00 |
| 4 | 1,81 | 450,00 |
| 5 | 3,92 | 175,00 |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 July to 30 September 2004

Total quantity available for the period 1 October to 31 December 2004

(t)

1

1,48

1 775,00

2

1,60

1 275,00

3

1,55

825,00

4

1,81

450,00

5

3,92

175,00

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3245 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3245

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 2012

  Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend by 3 years the authorization of the EB-5 Regional Center 
   Program, the E-Verify Program, the Special Immigrant Nonminister 
   Religious Worker Program, and the Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF EB-5 REGIONAL CENTER PROGRAM.

    Section 610 of the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the 
Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (8 U.S.C. 1153 
note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``pilot'' each place such term appears; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``September 30, 2012'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF E-VERIFY.

    Section 401(b) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2012'' and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF SPECIAL IMMIGRANT NONMINISTER RELIGIOUS 
              WORKER PROGRAM.

    Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (II), by striking ``September 30, 2012'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2015''; and
            (2) in subclause (III), by striking ``September 30, 2012'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.

SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF CONRAD STATE 30 J-1 VISA WAIVER PROGRAM.

    Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Technical 
Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2012'' and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.

SEC. 5. NO AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL IDENTIFICATION CARD.

    Nothing in this Act may be construed to authorize the planning, 
testing, piloting, or development of a national identification card.

            Passed the Senate August 2, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05620**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05620\05620_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05620\05620_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05620\05620_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05620\05620_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05620\05620_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05620\05620_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05620\05620_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05620\05620_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05620\Certification Statement Plant ID 05620.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 05620\Supplemental Documents\05620_Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 05620\Supplemental Documents\05620_Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05620\Supplemental Documents\05620_Part A_D_Block diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 05620\Supplemental Documents\05620_Smith SNCR sampling report_Aug09_D2-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 05620\Supplemental Documents\05620_Smith SNCR sampling report_Nov09_D2-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0577 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004D0577

**2004/577/EC: Council Decision of 29 April 2004 on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan establishing a double-checking system without quantitative limits in respect of the export of certain steel products from the Republic of Kazakhstan to the European Community **

*
Official Journal L 261 , 06/08/2004 P. 0048 - 0048 *

Council Decision of 29 April 2004 on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan establishing a double-checking system without quantitative limits in respect of the export of certain steel products from the Republic of Kazakhstan to the European Community (2004/577/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 300(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part(1), entered into force on 1 July 1999 .

(2) The European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan agreed to establish a double-checking system in respect of certain steel products for the period from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2001 . This Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters was approved on behalf of the European Community by means of Decision 1999/865/EC(2). Regulation (EC) No 2743/1999(3) established the corresponding implementing legislation for the Community.

(3) The Commission has finalised negotiations for an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan establishing a double-checking system without quantitative limits in respect of the export of certain steel products from the Republic of Kazakhstan to the European Community,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1. The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Republic of Kazakhstan establishing a double-checking system without quantitative limits in respect of the export of certain steel products from the Republic of Kazakhstan to the European Community is hereby approved on behalf of the European Community.

2. The text of the Agreement(4) is annexed to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters referred to in Article 1 in order to bind the Community.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2004 .

For the Council

The President

M. Mc Dowell

(1) OJ L 196, 28.7.1999, p. 3.

(2) OJ L 342, 31.12.1999, p. 37.

(3) OJ L 342, 31.12.1999, p. 1.

(4) See p. 49 of this Official Journal.
ENCLOSURE 1 **COMMONWEA LTH OF VIRGINIA**  **STA TE A** **IR POLLUTION CONTROL BOA RD**  **REGULA**

**TIONS FOR THE CONTROL A ND A**  **BA TEMENT OF A** **IR POLLUTION PROVISIONS A**  **FFECTED REVISION**  **K08 CONCERNING**  **NOx SIP CA**  **LL BUDGET (9VA** **C5 CHA PTER**  **140 )**  Adoption Date: October 23, 2008 Effe ctive Date: December 31, 2008 The following table lists the specific provisions of the attached regulations that will be used to implement the State Implementation Plan (SIP). A copy of the actual regulation submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the Virginia SIP is included in Enclosure 2. **PA RT I**  **NO X**  **Budget Trading Program** Article 10 State Trading Program Budget and Compliance Pool 9 VAC 5 - 140 - 900 State trading program budget (modified) 9 VAC 5 - 140 - 910 Compliance supplement poo l budget 9 VAC 5 - 140 - 920 Total electric generating unit allocations (modified) 9 VAC 5 - 140 - 930 Total non - electric generating unit allocations (modified) TEMPLATES \ SIP - REG \ REG01 SIP\ NONATTN PLANS \20 10 \ K08 - SIP - 1.DOC
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, M. Todd Holt, Chief Financial Officer of Knology, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knology, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 15, 2005
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 1 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 2 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 3 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 4 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 5 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 6 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 7 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 8 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 9 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 10 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 11 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 12 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 13 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 14 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 15 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 16 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 17 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 18 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 19 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 20 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 21 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 22 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 23 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 24 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 25 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 26 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 27 of 28
Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 52-1 Filed 12/04/19 Page 28 of 28
!"#$"%&'($'#)*+%,!"#-"(.-"+%,!"# /0	
		
0



	
0


0	
1	0	

0


2,+$"#$$*334,+-%,!"5"6!'7-%,!" 8		


00


8/0	
	9	

:;,+<2,"<#

10

0=		0


10		=		0


>?	0


@	0

==11@	0


0	A0	B00

?
	==11CD1



 E=	01F0
D0
0

0


/0	
		?0	

G	H?
 19


C
@	I?	



==11
	0
0?0	0	


 ==1110

0	>0J


K!'$L*:# 0	



=MN9 	D0	 O	
	0	


M	
		

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-6 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 3
 	




	
	

 

 	


	



	





!			"	
 #$


% 
	



#&	' 



()*+,)-./0

.),12,3456/-7,802,-49*3-



"	: 

 
'			
;	<	=		
>		>'; 

 	
	
	 $ 
	$		 

'	"		=		  	
	'	? '

@	";	 	
 	

>  '	
		
 	$?' 	
  
	'

	A' 		
"	: 

 	
 	; 	
'	 '$ 		 	 	 	

	'	A' 		
 
		

B*++955C)*+,)-D,59E,3-,8F

B*++955C)*+,)-934,)GE4+94H938,I,38,344,-493C5GD-F

J955C)*+,)-D,-2DK,E44*-4G4,93-I,E49*3F

L,CG)893CM*393CG38I5G3393CGII)*NG5-O+H,38*P3,,84*I)*N98,4H,Q4*4H,R*QQ9--9*3GIG)4*SQ659E,3-,GII59EG49*3F

.*)Q6C)*+93CSGE95946OPHGN,5*EG4,8I*4,349G5I)*I,)464HG49-M*3,8S*)GC)9E2542)G5I)*82E49*3T

P-4HG4-G49-SGE4*)64*4H,R*QQ9--9*3F

PS*2)*)CG39MG49*3*D4G93-G59E,3-,4*D,GC)*+,)G38G59E,3-,4*D,GI)*E,--*)OQG6+,5*EG4,

D*4H*S4H*-,*I,)G49*3-G4G-93C5,5*EG49*3F

U*Q,-4G4,-I)*N98,4HG44H,),9-GQGV9Q2Q*)Q939Q2Q32QD,)*SI5G34-4HG4EG3D,C)*+3D6G

59E,3-,8C)*+,)TJHG49-4H,32QD,)S*)WG)65G38F

RG3G59E,3-,8C)*+,)G5-*D,E*Q,GI)*E,--*)G38G89-I,3-,)OX9T,TOGN,)49EG556Y934,C)G4,8Z

Q,89EG5EG33GD9-*I,)G49*3F

[*,-G\-,E2),4)G3-I*)4G49*3E*QIG36]),129),G-,IG)G4,59E,3-,S)*Q4H,U4G4,*SWG)65G38F

WG6G4)G3-I*)4G49*3GC,34HGN,G3*3YWG)65G388)9N,)^-59E,3-,F

RG3GI,)-*3+94HGIG)49E25G)-7955D,,QI5*6,8IG)4Y49Q,D6Q*),4HG3*3,C)*+,)OI)*E,--*)O*)

89-I,3-G)6F

RG3GI,)-*3D,G3GC,34S*)GC)*+,)OI)*E,--*)G38G89-I,3-G)6F

JHG49-G\),-98,34]F

J95594D,3,E,--G)64*E*382E4DGE7C)*238EH,E7-S*),QI5*6,,-+H*8*3*4HG385,EG33GD9-O

-2EHG-KG394*)9G5-4GSSF

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-6 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 3
 	




	
	

 



 !


"


	

"#""

$%&'	"("	)%)*""+),(&

 +
%-%$.-$-$%%-%-/.

%-%$.-$.001

2344567893:;<=9>?;@58A7=?:9>7:=95=B:C6D9=E695A696F8396G:=A696D35:696GE3:CHHIIJ

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-6 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 3
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Integrating resource, social, and managerial indicators of quality into carrying capacity decision-making      

      January 1, 2001    

View Document

In park and wilderness management, integrating social and resource indicators is essential to meet park mandates that require the protection of both experiential and resource conditions. This paper will address the challenges we face in integrating social and resource data and outline a study in progress in Yosemite National Park. This study will develop and apply a management model that integrates resource, social and managerial indicators of quality into carrying capacity decisionmaking.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Minimum survival rates for Mississippi sandhill cranes:   a comparison of hand-rearing and parent-rearing      

      January 1, 2001    

Hand-reared (56) and parent-reared (76) juvenile Mississippi sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis pulla) were produced at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center (Patuxent), Laurel, Maryland over a 4-year period (1989-92) and released at the Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge), Gautier, Mississippi in a controlled experiment. Hand-reared survival rates proved higher than for parent-reared survival for each time category: 6 months, 86% versus 75%; 1 year, 77% versus 68%; 2 years 66% versus 53%; 3 years, 55% versus 43%: partial data for fourth and filth years were 57% versus 31% and 48% versus 37%.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Glenn Olsen, Ph.D.

##### Veterinary Medical Officer

Eastern Ecological Science Center

golsen@usgs.gov

301-497-5603

## Related Content

#### Glenn Olsen, Ph.D.

##### Veterinary Medical Officer

Eastern Ecological Science Center

golsen@usgs.gov

301-497-5603

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife Refuge; Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
                  -  MD
                  - Maryland
                  -  Mississippi
                  - Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife Refuge
                  -  Patuxent Wildlife Research Center

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States; part 1-B. North Atlantic slope basins, New York to York River      

      January 1, 1968    

View Document

View Plate

Flood magnitude-frequency relation applicable to streams in the North Atlantic slope basins, New York to York River, Va., are presented in this report.  The relations are based on flood data collected at 487 gaging stations having 5 or more years of record not materially affected by regulation. For sites on most streams, the magnitude of a flood of any given frequency between 1.1 and 50 years can be determined from two curves - one expressing the relation between the mean annual flood and size of draining basin and the other expressing the ratio to the mean annual flood of floods of other recurrence intervals. For New Jersey streams, an adjustment to the mean annual flood is based on the percentage of surface area covered by lakes and swamps in the basin.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Delaware
                  -  Maryland
                  -  New Jersey
                  -  New York
                  -  Pennsylvania
                  -  Virginia
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Introduction to the Python Hyperspectral Analysis Tool (PyHAT)      

      March 25, 2022    

Spectroscopic data are rich in information and are commonly used in planetary research. Many mission teams, research labs, and individual research scientists derive thematic products from multi- and hyperspectral data sets and apply spectroscopic analysis techniques to derive new understanding. The PyHAT is a powerful and versatile, free, and open-source Python library designed to support exploratory spectral data analysis, the derivation of mission generated thematic products, and the application of statistical learning methods to spectral data. We present a general overview of the software architecture and identify the classes of users we seek to support. Four case studies demonstrate the use for both orbital and in-situ (landed) hyperspectral data.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Ryan Bradley Anderson

##### Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

rbanderson@usgs.gov

734-657-8085

#### Itiya P Aneece

##### Research Geographer

Western Geographic Science Center

ianeece@usgs.gov

928-556-7111

## Related Content

#### Ryan Bradley Anderson

##### Physical Scientist

Astrogeology Science Center

rbanderson@usgs.gov

734-657-8085

#### Itiya P Aneece

##### Research Geographer

Western Geographic Science Center

ianeece@usgs.gov

928-556-7111

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

#### Western Geographic Science Center - Main Office

350 N. Akron Rd.Moffett Field, CA94035United States