alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 23 , 2015

M r. James Welsh

219 New York Avenue

Smithtown, NY 11787

Dear Mr. Welsh :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your M ay 14

, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

1663 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 4264

.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst

, Aircraft and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

This is to give notice that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Energy Markets Advisory Committee will conduct a public meeting on Wednesday, May 13, 2009. The meeting will take place in the first floor hearing room of the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss energy and environmental market issues. The meeting will be chaired by Commissioner Bart Chilton, who is Chairman of the Energy and Environmental Markets Advisory Committee.

*The agenda will consist of the following:*

(1) Call to Order and Introduction;

(2) Current Market and Regulatory Developments;

(3) Environmental Commodity Markets: The CFTC and a Carbon-Constrained World;

(4) Energy Price Volatility and Consumers;

(5) Discussion of Future Meetings and Topics;

(6) Adjournment.

The meeting is open to the public. Any member of the public who wishes to file a written statement with the committee should mail a copy of the statement to the attention of: Energy Markets Advisory Committee, c/o Commissioner Bart Chilton, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC 20581, before the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements should inform Commissioner Chilton in writing at the foregoing address at least three business days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made, if time permits, for oral presentations of no more than five minutes each in duration.

For further information concerning this meeting, please contact Commissioner Bart Chilton at 202-418-5060.

Issued by the Commission in Washington, DC, on April 24, 2009.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-9869 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 10.17

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2

 

TO

 

SENIOR EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT.

 

            The Ryland Group, Inc. (the "Company") and ______________ (the "Executive") amend the Senior Executive Severance Agreement dated as of December 6, 2006 (this “Agreement”).

 

Accordingly, the Agreement is amended as follows, effective December 7, 2011:

 

1.                                    Section 1.1 is amended in its entirety, as follows:

 

"1.1       Lump Sum Cash Payment.  On the 60th day following the Executive’s Separation from Service with the Corporation or any successor corporation, the Corporation or any successor corporation will pay the Executive, as an amount earned for services rendered, a pro rata bonus through the date of Separation from Service.  Also, on the 60th day following the Executive’s Separation form Service with the Corporation or any successor corporation, the Corporation or any successor corporation will pay the Executive a lump sum cash payment equal to two (2) times the highest Annual Compensation (as hereinafter defined) for any of the three (3) calendar years immediately preceding the date of Separation from Service.  For purposes of this Section 1.1, the pro-rata bonus shall be an amount equal to the target annual bonus for the year in which the Separation from Service occurs and, in the absence of a specified target annual bonus for such year, the highest  bonus earned by the Executive within the three (3) calendar years immediately preceding the date of Separation from Service, in either case pro rated for the period served during the year in which the Separation from Service occurs.”

 

2.         The second sentence of Section 1.3 is amended in its entirety, as follows:

 

"Additionally, on the 60th day following Separation from Service, the Responsible Corporation shall pay to the Executive a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of coverage under the Company's executive life insurance program, personal health services allowance and health club benefit program for a period of two years.”

 

3.         A new second sentence is added to Section 2.3 as follows:

 

“Such general release and waiver must be executed, and the statutory period during which the Executive is entitled to revoke the release must expire, on or before the 60th day after the date of the Executive's Separation from Service, or the Executive will forfeit the right to any payment under this Agreement.”

 

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of December 7, 2011.

 

 

	
THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.
    	
 
    	
EXECUTIVE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Attest:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
							


 

 

2
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 1 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 2 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 3 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 4 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 5 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 6 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 7 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 8 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 9 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 10 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 11 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 12 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 13 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 14 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 15 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 16 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 17 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 18 of 19
Case 19-18748-SMG Doc 48 Filed 03/05/20 Page 19 of 19
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sitestar Corporation. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Frank Erhartic, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Daniel Judd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Frank Erhartic, Jr.

/s/ Daniel Judd

Frank Erhartic, Jr.

Daniel Judd

Chief Executive Officer and President

Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2005

November 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 21.01


                                  SUBSIDIARIES



The Company has two wholly-owned  subsidiaries:  iSt Services, Inc. and Tracking
Systems Corporation.  iSt Services, Inc. was incorporated on September 25, 2002,
in the  State  of  Nebraska  and is in good  standing.  The  address  of the iSt
Services,  Inc. is 5078 South 111th  Street,  Omaha,  Nebraska  68137.  Tracking
Systems  Corporation  was  incorporated  on February 14,  1991,  in the State of
Pennsylvania  and  is  in  good  standing.   The  address  of  Tracking  Systems
Corporation is 5078 S. 111th Street, Omaha, NE 68137.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard Henry, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of AP Henderson Group on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of AP Henderson
Group.



                                    By:   /s/ Richard Henry
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard Henry, Chief Executive Officer


I, Richard Henry, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of AP Henderson Group on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of AP Henderson
Group.



                                   By:   /s/ Richard Henry
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Richard Henry, Chief Financial Officer
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 26 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JESS D. HUNT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GEORGE MILLER, in his capacity as

director of the Oklahoma Department

of Human Services,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-6216

(D.C. No. CIV-95-1656-A)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Plaintiff appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

defendant’s favor on his claims of age discrimination and retaliation in violation

of 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (ADEA). The district court concluded that of the eight

promotions plaintiff claims he was denied on the basis of his age, six were time

barred due to plaintiff’s failure to file an EEOC claim as required by 29 U.S.C.

§ 626(d). One of the two remaining promotions was denied because plaintiff was

not qualified. The final promotion, which formed the basis of the retaliation

claim, was denied because plaintiff had failed to demonstrate the requisite causal

connection between his EEOC claim and the adverse employment action. See

Corneveaux v. CUNA Mut. Ins. Group., 76 F.3d 1498, 1507 (10th Cir. 1996)

(stating elements of prima facie case of retaliation under ADEA).

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same

standard as the district court. See Applied Genetics Int’l, Inc., v. First Affiliated

Secs., Inc., 912 F.2d 1238, 1241 (10th Cir. 1990). “Summary judgment is

appropriate when there is no genuine dispute over a material fact and the moving

party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Russillo v. Scarborough, 935

F.2d 1167, 1170 (10th Cir. 1991). We have carefully reviewed the materials

submitted by the parties. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of defendant for substantially the same reasons stated in the

district court’s thorough order filed May 30, 1996.
-3-

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe

Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on February 20, 2009, Stepan 
Company, Natural Products Dept., 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New 
Jersey 07607, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of 
controlled substances listed in schedule II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine (9041).............................   II
Benzoylecgonine (9180).....................   II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail 
should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register 
Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 
22152; and must be filed no later than June 29, 2009.

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9807 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re: Case No.19-15157

 Chapter 13

 Fred James Hessler

Debtor /

NOTICE OF LATE FILING OF PAPER 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5005-1(F)(2)

Rachamin Cohen, ("Movant") files this Notice of Late Filing of Paper Pursuant to 

To Local Rule 5005-1(F)(2) and states as follows:

1. The attached Response in Opposition to the Motion for the Imposition of 

Sanctions Against the Debtor and his Attorney Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9011 [ECF 

No. 153] is filed for consideration at the hearing scheduled on April 22, 2020, at 9:30AM 

to consider the Motion for the Imposition of Sanction Against the Debtor and his Attorney 

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9011.

2. Movant has been unable to comply with the requirement of Local Rule 5005-

1(F)(1) for timely submission of papers in matters already set for hearing due to the 

following circumstances: We are living in unprecedented times; the past six weeks have 

not been business as usual. Undersigned parents were both infected with COVID19 and 

undersigned spent considerable amount of time to ensure they were being cared for and 

their recovery. Additionally, undersigned is working from home with four school-aged 

children and finds himself with new responsibilities of assisting in their distance learning, 

including sharing his work laptop.

Movant respectfully requests that the court consider this paper at the above 

scheduled hearing.

Case 19-15157-SMG Doc 155 Filed 04/21/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Rachamin Cohen, Attorney for Debtor Fred James Hessler, hereby certify that on 

April 21, 2020, I electronically filed the Certificate of Service regarding the Notice of Late 

Filing Paper with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida 

using the CM/ECF System. I have served the foregoing documents on the following CM/ECF 

participants:

Office of the US Trustee USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov 

Robin R Weiner ecf@ch13weiner.com;ecf2@ch13weiner.net

Steven G Powrozek spowrozek@logs.com

Isabel Colleran isabel.colleran@blaxgray.com

Mark Roher mroher@markroherlaw.com

I certify that on April 21, 2020 I have mailed via first-class mail, postage prepaid, the 

documents electronically filed with the Court on the additional parties listed below.

Submitted by:

/s/ Rachamin Cohen

Rachamin “Rocky” Cohen, Esq.

Attorney for Debtor

Florida Bar No. 96305

Cohen Legal Services, PA

12 SE 7th Street

Suite 805

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: 305-570-2326

Email: Rocky@lawcls.com

VIA USPS:

Bachrodt, Louis CIII

1801 West Atlantic Boulevard

Pompano Beach, FL 33069

Tri-County Truck & Equipment

1801 W Atlantic Blvd 

Pompano Beach, FL 33069

BCSS Ltd.

c/o Law Office of Mark S. Roher, P.A.

150 S. Pine Island Road, Suite 150

Plantation, FL 33324

LF-36 (rev. 12/01/09)

Case 19-15157-SMG Doc 155 Filed 04/21/20 Page 2 of 2
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended July 31, 2009, the undersigned Christopher H. Hopkins, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





September 9, 2009








/s/Christopher H. Hopkins


Christopher H. Hopkins, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3314 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3314

    To specifically authorize certain funds for an intelligence or 
         intelligence-related activity and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mr. Chambliss) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To specifically authorize certain funds for an intelligence or 
         intelligence-related activity and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDS FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

    Funds appropriated for an intelligence or intelligence-related 
activity of the United States Government as described on the last three 
lines in the table entitled Military Intelligence Program, Fiscal Year 
2012 Recommendation, Summary on the third page after page 69 of the 
funding tables in the classified annex to the Joint Explanatory 
Statement of the Committee of Conference to accompany the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112-74; 125 Stat. 786), in excess 
of the amount specified for such activity in the tables in the 
classified annex prepared to accompany the Intelligence Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-87; 125 Stat. 1876) shall be 
specifically authorized by Congress for purposes of section 504 of the 
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 414).
                                 <all>
```