alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0922 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0922

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 922/2004 of 29 April 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the grant of aid for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed and the sale of such skimmed-milk powder **

*
Official Journal L 163 , 30/04/2004 P. 0096 - 0096 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 922/2004

of 29 April 2004

amending Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the grant of aid for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed and the sale of such skimmed-milk powder

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 7(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999(2) fixes the amount of aid for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed taking into account the factors set out in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999. In view of developments in the supply situation for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder, the amount of aid should be reduced.

(2) Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(3) The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

"1. Aid is fixed at:

(a) EUR 4,57 per 100 kg of skimmed milk with a protein content of not less than 35,6 % of the non-fatty dry extract;

(b) EUR 4,04 per 100 kg of skimmed milk with a protein content of not less than 31,4 % but less than 35,6 % of the non-fatty dry extract;

(c) EUR 56,60 per 100 kg of skimmed-milk powder with a protein content of not less than 35,6 % of the non-fatty dry extract;

(d) EUR 49,92 per 100 kg of skimmed-milk powder with a protein content of not less than 31,4 % but less than 35,6 % of the non-fatty dry extract."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2) OJ L 340, 31.12.1999, p. 3. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2132/2003 (OJ L 320, 5.12.2003, p. 4).
Page 1 of 2

Date: June 27, 2012

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0542

SUBJECT: Meeting with Colombian Delegation

On June 27, 2012, EPA met with a Colombian delegation of government and industry

representatives. The delegation argued that palm oil grown in Colombia should have special 

distinction because Colombia has sustainability standards that meet the criteria in the RFS 

program. 

The discussion also covered the comments submitted by Colombia’s Minister of Mining 

and Energy and the Colombian National Biofuels Federation (Fedepalma). EPA requested 

additional information about a study that was included with the comments from the Minister of 

Mining and Energy.

1

 The comments included the Executive Summary and Introduction chapters 

of the study, but there appeared to be other chapters missing. EPA also requested any additional 

supporting materials, such as accompanying spreadsheets and GIS maps. The Colombian 

delegation said they would provide the three remaining study chapters after they are translated 

into English. EPA agreed that this additional information would help the Agency in its 

consideration of Colombia’s comments.

The meeting participants agreed to continue exchanging data and information for EPA to 

consider in its science-based assessment process.

Delegation from Colombia:

1. Jens Mesa Dishington, Executive President, Fedepalma, National Federation of Oil Palm 

Growers

2. Christie Daza, Technical Director, Colombia National Biofuels Federation

3. Jorge Bendeck, Executive President, Colombia National Biofuels Federation

4. Claudia Candela, Director, Colombia Government Trade Bureau

5. Johan Martinez Ruiz, Director of Economics, Asocana

6. Hans Moreno, Director, Biofuels Department, EcoPetrol

7. Tito Eduardo Salcedo Diaz, General Manager, Bio D S.A.

8. Jose Manual Zambrano Eder, Manuelita Corportiva SAS

9. Hernando Vergara Gomez Caceres, Biocombustibles Sostenibles del Carbe S.A.

10. Luis Romero, Biocombustibles Sostenibles del Caribe S.A.

11. Denisse Yanovich, Embassy of Colombia Washington, DC

12. Fabio Ferero, Embassy of Colombia Washington, DC

EPA Participants:

1. Paul Argyropolous, Senior Advisor, OTAQ

 

1 Ministry of Mining and Energy of Colombia, January 2012. “Assessment of biofuels chain production life cycle in 

Colombia.” Strategy of sustainable energy for Colombia. ATN/JC-10826-CO and ATN/JF-10827-CO.
Page 2 of 2

2. Sharyn Lie, Director, OTAQ/TCD/CEMC

3. Karen Laughlin, Advisor, OTAQ/TCD

4. Aaron Levy, Program Analyst, OTAQ/TCD/CEMC
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6394

KEVIN DWAYNE FLETCHER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. RICHARD MILLER; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:15

- cv - 00051

- TDC )

Submitted : August 30, 2018 Decided: September 14, 2018

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kevin Dwayne Fletcher , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Dwayne Fletcher seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying reli ef on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial sh owing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessmen t of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both tha t the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fletcher has not made the re quisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Fletcher’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argu ment would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

Registrant: 

 

eUniverse, Inc. 

Jurisdiction of formation: Delaware 

 

100% owned subsidiaries of eUniverse, Inc.: 

 

Cases Ladder, Inc. 

Jurisdiction of formation: California 

 

Download Solutions, Limited 

Jurisdiction offormation: Bermuda 

 

eCommerce Transactions, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation: Delaware 

 

Entertainment Universe, Inc. 

Jurisdiction offormation: California 

 

Falcon Ventures Corporation 

Jurisdiction of formation: California 

 

Gamer’s Alliance, Inc. 

Jurisdiction offormation: Missouri 

 

GameUniverse, Inc. 

Jurisdiction of formation: Delaware 

 

Infobeat, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation:Delaware 

 

Next Speed Hosting, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation: Delaware 

 

North Plains, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation:Delaware 

 

Opt-In Group, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation: Delaware 

 

Social Labs, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation:Delaware 

 

Sunningdale Holdings, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation: Delaware 

 

50.1% owned subsidiary of eCommerce Transactions, LLC 

 

Hydroderm, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation:Delaware 

 

50% owned subsidiary of eUniverse, Inc.: 

 

Yogabol, LLC 

Jurisdiction of formation: Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1960
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,635,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1960
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    11
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        11
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3516 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3516

 To encourage spectrum licensees to make unused spectrum available for 
use by rural and smaller carriers in order to expand wireless coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2012

   Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To encourage spectrum licensees to make unused spectrum available for 
use by rural and smaller carriers in order to expand wireless coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Spectrum Accessibility Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF LICENSES.

    Section 307 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 307) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Extension of Licenses.--
            ``(1) Definitions.--For purposes of this subsection--
                    ``(A) the term `rural area' means any area other 
                than--
                            ``(i) an area described in clause (i) or 
                        (ii) of section 343(a)(13)(A) of the 
                        Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 
                        U.S.C. 1991(a)(13)(A)); and
                            ``(ii) a city, town, or incorporated area 
                        that has a population of greater than 20,000 
                        inhabitants; and
                    ``(B) the term `small carrier' means a carrier with 
                annual revenue less than $500,000,000 or that provides 
                wireless service to less than 1,500,000 customers.
            ``(2) Establishment of program.--Not later than 90 days 
        after the date of enactment of Rural Spectrum Accessibility Act 
        of 2012, the Commission shall establish a program under which a 
        carrier that receives a license under this section may 
        partition or disaggregate the license in order to make unused 
        spectrum available to small carriers or carriers serving a 
        rural area.
            ``(3) Extension of license term.--Any carrier that receives 
        a license under this section and participates in the program 
        established under paragraph (2) shall receive a 3-year 
        extension of the license granted under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.40


 


 


 





I, George L. Engelke Jr., acknowledge and agree that my base salary,
as set forth in Amendments No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements by and between myself and Astoria Financial
Corporation and Astoria Federal Savings and Loan Association entered into as of April 21, 2010 (the “Amendments”),
has been further reduced to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) effective January 30, 2012 and that the Amendments, as amended
hereby, otherwise remain in full force and effect. I also hereby permanently and irrevocably waive any and all rights that I or
my beneficiaries may have to claim an entitlement to an Annual Award of Shares of Astoria Financial Corporation under the terms
of the 2005 Re-designated, Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan for Officers and Employees of Astoria Financial Corporation
for the 2012 calendar year scheduled for grant on or about January 30, 2012.


 





 


 


 


/s/ George L. Engelke, Jr.    


George L. Engelke Jr.


 


Dated


January 30, 2012
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         HORSESHOE GAMING HOLDING CORP.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003

<Table>
<Caption>

SUBSIDIARY                                                    STATE OF INCORPORATION/FORMATION
----------                                                    --------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Horseshoe GP, Inc. (1)                                                 Nevada
New Gaming Capital Partnership (2)                                     Nevada
Horseshoe Entertainment (3)                                            Louisiana
Bossier City Land Corporation (4)                                      Louisiana
Robinson Property Group, Limited Partnership (2)                       Mississippi
Horseshoe Hammond, Inc. (1)                                            Indiana
Hammond Residential LLC (5)                                            Indiana
Horseshoe Ventures, LLC (6)                                            Delaware
Red Oak Insurance Company Ltd. (1)                                     Barbados
Horseshoe Shreveport, L.L.C.(1)                                        Louisiana
Casino Computer Programming, Inc.(1)                                   Indiana
Horseshoe License Company (7)                                          Nevada
</Table>

(1)  100% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.

(2)  99% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp. through Limited Partner
     interest and 1% owned by Horseshoe GP, Inc. through General Partner
     interest

(3)  New Gaming Capital Partnership owns 89% General Partner interest and a
     2.92% Limited Partner interest. Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp. owns the
     remaining 8.08% Limited Partner interest.

(4)  100% owned by Horseshoe Entertainment

(5)  100% owned by Horseshoe Hammond, Inc.

(6)  80% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.

(7)  49% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Aptimus, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Wade, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                         /s/ John A. Wade
                                                         John A. Wade
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         March 18, 2004
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

LOUIS TINO FISHER,

 Debtor.

CASE NO. 19-19710-SMG

Chapter 7

ORDER DENYING CREDITOR THEODORE ROBERTS’ MOTION FOR IMPOSITION OF 

SANCTIONS AGAINST DEBTOR PURSUANT TO RULE 9011 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF

BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court for hearing on January 9, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.

on Creditor Theodore Roberts’ Motion for Imposition of Sanctions Against Debtor Pursuant to 

Rule 9011 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Motion”). [ECF 40]. The Court, 

having reviewed the Motion and the record herein, 

ORDERS that the Motion is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record.

###

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 9, 2020.

Scott M. Grossman, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-19710-SMG Doc 51 Filed 01/10/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Submitted by and copies furnished to:

Jason E. Slatkin, Esq.

Slatkin & Reynolds, P.A.

Attorneys for Theodore Roberts

One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 609

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: 954.745.5880

Facsimile: 954.745.5890

E-mail: jslatkin/rreynolds@slatkinreynolds.com

Jason E. Slatkin is directed to serve a 

copy of this Order on all entitled to 

service thereof and to file a certificate of 

service immediately thereafter.

Case 19-19710-SMG Doc 51 Filed 01/10/20 Page 2 of 2
NUMBER 13-16-00235-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

ALEXANDER TORRES 

A/K/A ALEX TORRES, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 117th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Alexander Torres a/k/a Alex Torres, attempts to appeal his conviction 

for assault. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the 

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On April 26, 2016, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s 

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification.

On June 1, 2016, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response 

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that 

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed 

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are likewise DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

9th day of June, 2016.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3348 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3348

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the multifamily 
    transitional housing loan program of the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2012

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the multifamily 
    transitional housing loan program of the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR PAYMENT BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF 
              GUARANTEES FOR LOANS GUARANTEED BY SECRETARY FOR 
              MULTIFAMILY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROJECTS.

    Section 2053 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection (a):
    ``(a)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary 
may, for any loan guaranteed under this subchapter, pay the guarantee, 
in part or in full, if the loan is not in default. Such guarantee 
payment may include amounts necessary to extinguish the loan and pay 
all prepayment premiums and transaction costs.
    ``(2) The Secretary may forgive, waive, release, or discharge a 
borrower's liability to the Secretary with respect to a loan or a 
guarantee for the loan for any loss resulting from a payment made under 
paragraph (1).
    ``(3) The amount resulting from a decision of the Secretary to 
forgive, waive, release, or discharge any repayment obligation owed by 
the borrower to the Secretary with respect to a loan guaranteed by the 
Secretary under this subchapter for a multifamily transitional housing 
project--
            ``(A) shall not be included in the borrower's gross income;
            ``(B) shall be treated as an amount not derived from a 
        Federal grant for purposes of subsection (d)(5)(A) of section 
        42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
            ``(C) shall not otherwise reduce the borrower's depreciable 
        basis or eligible basis (for purposes of such section 42) of 
        such housing project.''.
                                 <all>
```