alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3677 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3677

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2012

            Referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To make a technical correction to the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 
                                 1973.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 102(d)(1)(A) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 
(42 U.S.C. 4012a(d)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ``residential'' 
before ``improved real estate'' each place that term appears.

            Passed the Senate December 12, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3624 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3624

   To amend section 31311 of title 49, United States Code, to permit 
 States to issue commercial driver's licenses to members of the Armed 
           Forces whose duty station is located in the State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 21), 2012

Ms. Snowe (for herself, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Moran, 
Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Begich, Ms. Klobuchar, 
  Mr. Isakson, and Mr. Brown of Ohio) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 31311 of title 49, United States Code, to permit 
 States to issue commercial driver's licenses to members of the Armed 
           Forces whose duty station is located in the State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Commercial Driver's License 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. DOMICILE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE.

    Section 31311(a)(12) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(12)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), 
        the State may issue a commercial driver's license only to an 
        individual who operates or will operate a commercial motor 
        vehicle and is domiciled in the State.
            ``(B) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the 
        State may issue a commercial driver's license to an individual 
        who--
                    ``(i) operates or will operate a commercial motor 
                vehicle; and
                    ``(ii) is not domiciled in a State that issues 
                commercial driver's licenses.
            ``(C) The State may issue a commercial driver's license to 
        an individual who--
                    ``(i) operates or will operate a commercial motor 
                vehicle;
                    ``(ii) is a member of the active duty military, 
                military reserves, National Guard, active duty United 
                States Coast Guard, or Coast Guard Auxiliary; and
                    ``(iii) is not domiciled in the State, but whose 
                temporary or permanent duty station is located in the 
                State.''.
                                 <all>
```
Carlos FLEITAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2815

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018

Carlos Fleitas, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# Time and Date:

 February 12, 2009, 12 noon to 3 p.m., Eastern Standard Time.

# Place:

 This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the toll free number and pass code needed to participate in this meeting by telephone.

# Status:

 Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

 The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement; and, to that end, it may consider matters properly before the Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

Dated: January 13, 2009.

Larry W. Minor,

Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.

 [FR Doc. E9-987 Filed 1-13-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0499 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0499

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 499/2004 of 17 March 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003 as regards the time limit and the model for reporting in the bovine sector (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 080 , 18/03/2004 P. 0024 - 0025 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 499/2004

of 17 March 2004

amending Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003 as regards the time limit and the model for reporting in the bovine sector

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97(1), and in particular Article 10(d) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003(2) lays down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 as regards the minimum level of controls to be carried out in the framework of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals.

(2) The deadline for reporting the annual controls under Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003 should be aligned with the deadline for submission of reports on annual premiums under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 of 11 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92(3).

(3) With a view to securing efficient cooperation between Member States and the Commission regarding the presentation to the Commission of the results of the controls in the bovine sector in the framework of the annual reports foreseen in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003, it is important to improve the existing model for the transmission of these reports in order to enhance the informative capability and comparability of these reports.

(4) Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1082/2003 is amended as follows:

1. in Article 5(1) "1 July" is replaced by "31 August".

2. Annex I is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2004.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 204, 11.8.2000, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 156, 25.6.2003, p. 9.

(3) OJ L 327, 12.12.2001, p. 11, Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 118/2004 (OJ L 17, 24.1.2004, p. 7).

ANNEX

"ANNEX I

>PIC FILE= "L_2004080EN.002503.TIF">"
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 19, 2015

No. 04-15-00174-CV

Ex Parte Juan Jose GARCIA,

Appellant

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 8,044

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 7, 2015, the Zapata County District Clerk filed a notice with this court 

requesting permission to paper file Appeal No. 04-15-00174-CV. The clerk explained that efiling procedures in her office were not yet complete. The request is GRANTED and the paper 

record is deemed timely filed as of May 6, 2015.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 1 of 9
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 2 of 9
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 3 of 9
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 4 of 9
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 5 of 9
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 6 of 9
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 7 of 9
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 8 of 9
Case 19-01790-AJC Doc 15 Filed 02/12/20 Page 9 of 9
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3546 

To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to reauthorize a 

provision to ensure the survival and continuing vitality of Native American languages. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. TESTER, Mr. 

UDALL of New Mexico, and Mr. FRANKEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to 

reauthorize a provision to ensure the survival and continuing vitality of Native American languages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN LAN4 GUAGES PROGRAM. 

5 Section 816(e) of the Native American Programs Act 

6 of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d(e)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2013 

8 through 2017’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the   accompanying   Quarterly   Report  of  Dazzling
Investments,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB/A  for the  period  ended
September 30, 2005 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amy Hadley, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of the  Company,  hereby  certifies  for the  purpose  of  complying  with  Rule
13a-14(b)  or  Rule  15d-14(b)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (the
"Exchange  Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: December 12, 2005                  By: /s/ AMY HADLEY
                                          ______________________________________
                                          Amy Hadley
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                          Officer and Director



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DAZZLING INVESTMENTS, INC., AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY DAZZLING INVESTMENTS, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7380** 

CHARLES RAY LESLIE , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. John A. Gibney, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00726

- JAG )

Submitted : February 28, 2014 Decided: March 7, 2014

Before KING, GREGORY, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Charles Ray Leslie, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Charles Ray Leslie seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) ( A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by de monstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We hav e independently reviewed the record and conclude that Leslie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# IM90W PORTABLE ICE MAKER



# -


# - • Up

### to 261)5 

### or Ice

### rneIm'9 cepadty • 9 pal

## or Ia! In 7-15 min IM!I'IIg!. • loa 

### ope: SrniI/MIII:IlunV\..ilrge Idatt:ypI! 

### • lDI mii!lle 

### 131Bd1¥:2.2 Ills • 'MIter storlIge QIPIIdIr. 3.2 L • High effIdent tOiliPO :, with 

### Low noise opellrtlon • Refrigertllion 

### codl!:l34A • PiatPelettloolcallll'Dlwith 

### 'hi I..,. • TrW( porIiIbII! IcII**make~** na 

### pkmblng • 1'IMrIIr:12Ov 60Hz 13DW 

### • floor I..o!Idlng Qty. (Non-5lp SIlIIet): 

### 2O'I4O'/4O'HQ: 450/930/1115 pes 

### •**~** 

### Sheett.o.dlng Qty. 

### 2O'/'fO'/'f01iQ: 

### 4201900/1068 pDI • Unit Dimensions (WxDxH): 11.7" Ie 14.4' Ie 14.9" 

### • PacIcIng Dlmaalans (WlcDxH): 13.4" Ie 16.1'1[ 16.9" • Net 'iJ
. 4lt/Gro&!I W.,.ot: 29.3fJ2.,2 Ib. 

# , • UPC#: G-25806 80147-7 

## • m appro'ts 

# ...


# -
1The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the

Northern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1344

___________

Alan Sandusky, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa

Marian Health Center, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 26, 1999

 Filed: March 1, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Alan Sandusky appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1

for the Northern District of Iowa granting summary judgment to Marian Health

Center in Sandusky&s age discrimination suit. After a careful review of the record and

the parties& submissions on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court in its thorough opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Sandusky&s pending

motions.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 79 Filed 06/08/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 79 Filed 06/08/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 79 Filed 06/08/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-24331-PGH Doc 79 Filed 06/08/20 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.SECTION1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Sitestar Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, Frank Erhartic, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, and Daniel Judd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and




2.  The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Frank Erhartic, Jr.
                    
                    /s/ Daniel JuddFrank
      Erhartic, Jr.
                    
                    Daniel
      JuddChief
      Executive Officer and President
                    
                    Chief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      14, 2009
                    
                    August 14, 2009
Darren DITONA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6151

RONALD JERRY SAWYER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. ALEXANDER; T. GOODRICH; D. LIPSCONE;

R. WALKER, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-6432

RONALD JERRY SAWYER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. ALEXANDER; T. GOODRICH; D. LIPSCONE;

R. WALKER, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-95-1105-CV-2, CA-95-1103-CV-2)
2

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

No. 96-6151 affirmed and No. 96-6432 dismissed by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In No. 96-6151, Appellant appeals the district court's order

denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. We find that

the denial of leave to appeal was not an abuse of discretion.

Williams v. Field, 394 F.2d 329 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S.

891 (1965). Accordingly, we affirm.

In No. 96-6432, Appellant appeals from the district court's

order declining to rule on the motions he filed after filing his

appeal in No. 96-6151. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ.

P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 96-6151 - AFFIRMED

No. 96-6432 - DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, May 29, 2009.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-9698 Filed 4-24-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P