alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, John Zongyang Li, Co- Chief Executive Officer of Sun New Media, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sun New Media, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e)and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report was being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.    /s/John ZongyangLi                             John Zongyang Li, Co-Chief ExecutiveOfficer and DirectorDate: January 13, 2006
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3514 

To repeal a limitation on annual payments under the Surface Mining Control 

and Reclamation Act of 1977. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2012 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. CASEY, and 

Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal a limitation on annual payments under the Surface 

Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON PAYMENTS FROM 

4 THE ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION FUND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 411(h) of the Surface 

6 Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 

7 1240a(h)) is amended by striking paragraph (5). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) takes effect 

9 on July 6, 2012. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         104,685
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,685
<PP&E>                                         198,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                (37,106)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 617,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          569,150
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,421
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   617,956
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,028
<CGS>                                          311,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (536,541)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.
 /s/ L. Dwight DouceL. Dwight DoucePresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director/s/ Eric S. NadeauEric S. NadeauChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and TreasurerNovember 14,
2005
# L_2004209EN.01000701.xml

| 11.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 209/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1090/2004

of 10 June 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 30th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 30th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 49,179 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 181, 19.7.2003, p. 7. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2126/2003 (OJ L 319, 4.12.2003, p. 4).

2

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Leveraging machine learning to automate regression model evaluations for large multi-site water-quality trend studies      

      October 31, 2023    

Large multi-site trend studies provide an opportunity to evaluate progress of waterbodies towards water-quality goals across broad geographic areas. Such studies often aggregate the results of site-specific models and thus contend with evaluating each model for appropriate fit and statistical assumptions. We explored the use of four traditional machine learning models (logistic regression, linear and quadratic discriminant analysis, and k-nearest neighbors) to perform these checks and estimate probabilities that an analyst would publish or reject a site-specific trend model from a multi-site study. We trained these “model-checking models” (MCMs) using a national study of over 6000 trend models and tested the MCMs using a smaller set of novel trend models. Although the MCMs did not perform well enough to bypass analyst review entirely, we found incorporating an MCM into a larger evaluation workflow can reduce the number of trend models needing an analyst review by more than half.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Data           
                  -              Connect           

October 4, 2023

####                 Data to support Leveraging machine learning to automate regression model evaluations for large multi-site water-quality trend studies              

Central Midwest Water Science Center

#### Jennifer Murphy

##### Hydrologist

Central Midwest Water Science Center

jmurphy@usgs.gov

815-752-2040

#### Jeff  G. Chanat

##### Hydrologist

Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

jchanat@usgs.gov

804-261-2618

## Related Content

October 4, 2023

####                 Data to support Leveraging machine learning to automate regression model evaluations for large multi-site water-quality trend studies              

Central Midwest Water Science Center

#### Jennifer Murphy

##### Hydrologist

Central Midwest Water Science Center

jmurphy@usgs.gov

815-752-2040

#### Jeff  G. Chanat

##### Hydrologist

Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

jchanat@usgs.gov

804-261-2618

### Contact

#### Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center

1730 East Parham RoadRichmond, VA23228United States

(804) 261-2600

(804) 261-2657
EXHIBIT 10.8(f)


LIST OF CERTAIN BENEFITS

AVAILABLE TO CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

(As in effect February 1, 2012)


The following benefits are
available to some or all executive officers (among other persons), but not to
all full-time employees of the Corporation.


	
  

 	
  

 
	
 1)

 	
 If the Board has
 authorized a stock repurchase program, an executive may request the
 repurchase of shares of the Corporation at the day’s volume-weighted average
 price with no payment of any fees or commissions if the repurchase of the
 shares is otherwise permissible under the authorized program.

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
 2)

 	
 The Corporation’s
 disability insurance program generally is available to employees. Persons
 above a certain grade level, including executive officers, receive an
 additional benefit. Executive officers are paid an amount each year intended
 to reimburse premiums associated with the additional benefit.

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
 3)

 	
 The Corporation makes
 available or pays for tax preparation, tax consulting, estate planning, and
 financial counseling services for executive officers. If a preferred provider
 is used, the Corporation will pay the annual counseling fee ($13,500 for
 2012) per person as well as general engagement fees and expenses which are
 not applied on a per person basis. If an executive chooses to use another provider,
 the Corporation will reimburse actual costs up to the following limits:
 $15,000 per year for the CEO ($22,500 in any year in which a new financial
 counseling firm is engaged); and $5,000 per year for other executives ($7,500
 in any year in which a new financial counseling firm is engaged).

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
 4)

 	
 On occasion spouses of
 certain employees, including executive officers, are asked by the
 Corporation, for business reasons, to accompany the employee on a business
 trip or function. In those cases the Corporation may pay the travel,
 accommodation, and other expenses of the spouse incidental to the trip or
 function, some or all of which can result in taxable income for the employee.
 Also, on occasion the Corporation may provide or pay for a memento, gift, or
 other gratuity that the employee or spouse receives in connection with the
 business trip or function.

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
 5)

 	
 The
 Corporation provides a relocation benefit to a wide range of employees,
 including executive officers, under varying circumstances and subject to
 certain constraints. The benefit may be in the form of an allowance or a
 reimbursement of actual expenses, and includes a tax gross up feature.
# L_2023214EN.01022801.xml

| 31.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 214/228 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 214/228

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1480/2004 of 10 August 2004 laying down specific rules concerning goods arriving from the areas not under the effective control of the Government of Cyprus in the areas in which the Government exercises effective control

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 272 of 20 August 2004
  )

On page 7, in Annex I, title ‘Certification of the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce’:

for:

‘Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/93’,

read:

‘Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92’.

On page 8, in Annex II, title ‘Declaration by the producer’:

for:

‘Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/93’,

read:

‘Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92’.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-10833

_____________________

STATE BANK & TRUST CO., DALLAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas (3:95-CV-2395-G)

_________________________________________________________________ April 7, 2000

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This case involves claims of conversion and unjust enrichment

brought by State Bank, the plaintiff-appellant, against the

Insurance Company of the West (ICW), the defendant-appellee. State

Ban k was the creditor of a plumbing subcontractor (DRT) that

defaulted on its loans. State Bank contends that ICW, the surety

for DRT, tortiously converted the tools, equipment and inventories

of DRT, against which S tate Bank had secured its loans.

Specifically, State Bank argues that IC W converted this property2

when ICW stepped in to complete three commercial subcontr acts as

required by ICW’s performance bonds with DRT.

We have reviewed the record and studied the briefs in this

matter. We have also considered the arguments made before us. The

district court thoroughly treated the issues before it in a well

reasoned opinion. We cannot say that the district court was

clearly erroneous in determining that State Bank consented to the

use of materials and tools by ICW. Consequently, we agree with the

district court that State Bank is entitled to no equitable relief,

either under a theory of conversion or unjust enrichment.

Therefore, the judgment of the district court is

A F F I R M E D.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 47 7

. SHELLEY LOVELACE v . MARK BUTLER, COMMI SSI ONER OF GEORGI A DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et a l

.

Sh el ley Lo vel ace fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap peal fro m a s u p eri or co u rt o rd er rev i ewi n g

a d eci s io n b y t h e G eo rg ia Dep art m en t o f Lab o r’ s Bo ard o f Rev i ew. Ho w ev er, u n d er OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ), ap p eal s fro m o rd ers o f s u p eri or co u rt s rev i ewi n g d eci s i on s

o f s t at e ad m i n i s t r a t i v e ag en ci es m u s t b e i n i ti at ed b y fi l i n g an ap pl i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew. See Du n l a p v. Ci ty o f At l a nt a , 2 7 2 Ga. 5 23
, 5 24 (5 3 1 SE2 d 7 0 2 ) (2 0 0 0). Lo v el ace’ s fai l u re t o fo l l o w t h e req u i red ap p el l at e p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. October 17, 2019

10/17/2019
NEE-12.31.2011-Ex 10.rr






Exhibit 10(rr)
NEXTERA ENERGY, INC.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY
(Effective January 1, 2012)
	
		
	Annual Retainer
    (payable quarterly in common stock or cash)
	$55,000

	 
	 

	Board or Committee meeting fee
	$2,000/meeting

	 
	 

	Audit Committee Chair retainer (annual)
     (payable quarterly)
	$15,000

	 
	 

	Other Committee Chair retainer (annual)
     (payable quarterly)
	$10,000

	 
	 

	Annual grant of restricted stock
     (under 2007 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan)
	that number of shares determined by dividing $125,000 by closing price of NextEra Energy common stock on effective date of grant (rounded up to the nearest 10 shares)

	 
	 

	Miscellaneous
	‐ Travel and Accident Insurance (including spouse coverage)

	 
	 

	 
	‐ Certain directors accrue dividends and interest on the phantom stock units granted to them upon the termination of the Non-Employee Director Retirement Plan in 1996

	 
	 

	 
	‐ Travel and related expenses while on Board business, and actual administrative or similar expenses incurred for Board or Committee business, are paid or reimbursed by the Company  Directors may travel on Company aircraft in accordance with the Company's Aviation Policy (primarily to or from Board meetings and while on Board business; in limited circumstances for other reasons if the Company would incur little if any incremental cost, space is available and the aircraft is already in use for another authorized purpose - may be accompanied by immediate family members when space is available).

	 
	 

	 
	‐ Directors may participate in the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan.

	 
	 

	 
	‐ Directors may participate in the Company's matching gift program, which matches gifts to educational institutions to a maximum of $10,000 per donor.
Unassociated Document




Exhibit 4.8.39 - Electronic Catalogue (13) – Sanitation - Wash Basin
Case 19-20438-CLC    Doc 64    Filed 06/02/20    Page 1 of 3

Case 19-20438-CLC    Doc 64    Filed 06/02/20    Page 2 of 3

Case 19-20438-CLC    Doc 64    Filed 06/02/20    Page 3 of 3
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 287 

For the relief of Luay Lufti Hadad. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2011 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Luay Lufti Hadad. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LUAY 

4 LUFTI HADAD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Luay Lufti Hadad shall be eligible 

8 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 

9 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

10 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an im11 migrant visa under section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 287 IS

1 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 

2 resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Luay Lufti Hadad 

4 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci5 fied in subsection (c), Luay Lufti Hadad shall be consid6 ered to have entered and remained lawfully in the United 

7 States and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under 

8 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

9 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub11 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

12 issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for ad13 justment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later 

14 than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

16 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or adjustment 

17 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma18 nent residence to Luay Lufti Hadad, the Secretary of 

19 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur20 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num21 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

22 of the country of birth of Luay Lufti Hadad under section 

23 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

24 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
Scott M. Grossman, Judge

_____________________________________________________________________________ United States Bankruptcy Court

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 26, 2022.

Case 19-01291-SMG Doc 263 Filed 05/26/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-01291-SMG Doc 263 Filed 05/26/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-01291-SMG Doc 263 Filed 05/26/22 Page 3 of 3