alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-5201

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

EUREKA BARNES, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:05-cr-01297-TLW-1) 

Submitted: August 6, 2009 Decided: January 12, 2010 

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

David B. Betts, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. W. 

Walter Wilkins, United States Attorney, Carrie A. Fisher, 

William E. Day, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence, 

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Eureka Barnes pled guilty to one count of making false 

statements to a Secret Service agent, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1001 (2006). Barnes was sentenced to thirty-six months’ 

imprisonment, and now appeals. Finding no error, we affirm. 

 We find Barnes’s sentence is not procedurally 

unreasonable. In sentencing a defendant, a district court must 

first properly calculate the Guideline range. Gall v. United 

States, 552 U.S. 38, ___, 128 S. Ct. 586, 596 (2007). When 

reviewing the district court’s application of the Sentencing 

Guidelines, this court reviews findings of fact for clear error 

and questions of law de novo. United States v. Osborne, 514 

F.3d 377, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 2525 (2008). 

 Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the 

district court followed the necessary procedural steps in 

sentencing Barnes, and properly calculated the applicable 

Guideline range. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and 

sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Isotopic and chemical composition of Parbati Valley geothermal discharges, north-west Himalaya, India      

      January 1, 1983    

The isotopic compositions of the waters discharged from Parbati Valley geothermal areas indicate a higher altitude meteoric origin, with discharge temperatures reflecting variations in the depth of penetration of the waters to levels heated by the existence of a ‘normal’ geothermal gradient. On the basis of mixing models involving silica, tritium, discharge temperatures and chloride contents, deep equilibration temperatures of 120–140°C were obtained for Manikaran, possibly reaching 160°C at even greater depth. Geothermometers based on sulfate-water 18O exchange and gas reactions point to similar temperatures. Exceptionally high helium contents of the discharges correspond to apparent crustal residence times of the waters in the order of 10–100 Ma; relative nitrogen-argon contents support a largely meteoric origin of the waters with a possible fossil brine, but no detectable magmatic component.

## Citation Information
Exhibit 31.2   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Thomas Lee, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Uni Core Holdings Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:April 30, 2013/s/ THOMAS LEEThomas LeeChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 3 CONSENT OF BENNETT JONES LLP Bennett Jones LLP
4500 Bankers Hall East
855  2nd Street SW
Calgary, AB T2P 4K7 July 13, 2004 Pengrowth Energy Trust
Suite 2900, 111  5th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3Y6 Re:     Pengrowth Energy Trust Registration Statement on Form 40-F Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as counsel for Pengrowth Energy Trust (the Trust), a trust
organized under the laws of Alberta, Canada, with respect to certain legal
matters in connection with the preparation of a Registration Statement on Form
40-F relating to the registration of the Class A Units of the Trust pursuant to
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Registration Statement)
to which this opinion is an exhibit. In connection therewith, we prepared the discussion (the Discussion) set
forth under the captions Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations
and Taxation of the Registrant in the Registration Statement. Capitalized
terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Registration Statement. All statements of legal conclusions contained in the Discussion, unless
otherwise noted, are our opinion with respect to the matters set forth therein
as of the date of the Registration Statement, as qualified by the limitations
contained in the Discussion. In addition, we are of the opinion that the
Discussion with respect to those matters as to which no legal conclusions are
provided is an accurate discussion of such federal income tax matters (except
for the representations and statements of fact of the Trust, included in the
Discussion, as to which we express no opinion). We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to use of our name under the headings Certain
Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations and Taxation of the Registrant in
the Registration Statement. This consent does not constitute an admission that
we are experts within the meaning of such term as used in the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission issued thereunder. Very truly yours, 
/s/
Bennett Jones LLP
<PAGE>



     CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Victor Romero, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-KSB of Reality  Wireless
Networks,  Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our  supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating to the
registrant,  including  its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by
others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the period in which this
report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


December 27, 2003

/s/ _____________________
Victor Romero
Principal Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE

JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00145

- CR

Appeal from the

210th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20190D03583)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2 0 24

.

GINA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Alley , C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ

. Soto, J., concurring
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 98 Filed 01/07/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 98 Filed 01/07/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-17620-RAM Doc 98 Filed 01/07/20 Page 3 of 3
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-30 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-30 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-30 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-30 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 10.38 


Escalade,
Incorporated

Schedule of Director Compensation


Each director of Escalade, Incorporated currently
receives an annual cash retainer of $25,000 with the exception of the Chairman
of the Board who receives an annual cash retainer of $50,000.  Each member of the Audit Committee receives
an additional annual fee of $5,000 except for the committee Chairman who
receives $15,000. Each member of the Compensation Committee receives an
additional annual fee of $3,000 except for the committee Chairman who receives
$10,000. All Directors receive an additional fee of $1,000 per board meeting
attended in excess of eight meetings per year. Members of the Audit Committee
and Compensation Committee receive additional fees of $1,000 per committee
meeting attended in excess of six and four meetings, respectively.


Under the terms of the Escalade, Incorporated 2007
Incentive Plan, Directors can elect to receive earned compensation as either
cash, stock or restricted units.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 77 (Thursday, April 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Non-Human Primate Reagent Resource.
    Date: May 14, 2009.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, 3200, Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Ellen S. Buczko, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2676, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d181f081e0716124c3d13141c141953131415531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="47222532243d2c287607292e262e2369292e2f69202831">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-9349 Filed 4-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002)



The undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of
Knology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, based on his knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 (this Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                        
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert K. Mills                    
|                         |  | Robert K. Mills Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Andrew
      Lyon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.




I,
      John
      Wells, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      of
      Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.




May
      15,
      2006









By:  /s/
      Andrew Lyon


Andrew
      Lyon


Chief
      Executive Officer









By:  /s/
      John Wells


John
      Wells


Chief
      Financial Officer
2011.12.31. EX 10.6






EXHIBIT 10.6
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.
NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


WHEREAS, Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Franklin Electric Co., Inc. Nonemployee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for its nonemployee directors; and


WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan and now deems it appropriate to do so to comply with the applicable rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market.


NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of April 1, 2011, by revising Section 9.2 of the Plan to read as follows:


9.2    Fair Market Value.  For all purposes of the Plan, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of a given date shall be the consolidated closing bid price for a share of Common Stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market for the preceding trading day, or if there is no such consolidated closing bid price on the trading day preceding the given date, then on the last previous day on which a consolidated closing bid price was reported.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment has been duly executed as of this 6th day of May, 2011.


	
			
	 
	 
	FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO., INC.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ John J. Haines

	 
	 
	John J. Haines

	 
	 
	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00020-CV

Robert M. STONE, Raymond S. DeLeon, and John Salas,

Appellants

v.

THE CARLSON LAW FIRM,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-16271

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellants.

SIGNED March 27, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3564 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3564

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the Public Interest Declassification Act of 2000 until 2014 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Interest Declassification 
Board Reauthorization Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC INTEREST DECLASSIFICATION BOARD.

    (a) Subsequent Appointment.--Section 703(c)(2)(D) of the Public 
Interest Declassification Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-567; 50 U.S.C. 
435 note) is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 
``from the date of the appointment.''.
    (b) Vacancy.--Section 703(c)(3) of the Public Interest 
Declassification Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-567; 50 U.S.C. 435 note) 
is amended by striking ``A member of the Board appointed to fill a 
vacancy before the expiration of a term shall serve for the remainder 
of the term.''.
    (c) Extension of Sunset.--Section 710(b) of the Public Interest 
Declassification Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-567; 50 U.S.C. 435 note) 
is amended by striking ``2012.'' inserting ``2014.''.

            Passed the Senate December 11, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3564

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the Public Interest Declassification Act of 2000 until 2014 
                        and for other purposes.
```