alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Internet Pictures Corporation
(collectively, the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, Donald Strickland and Paul Farmer, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

/s/ Donald Strickland
-----------------------------
Donald Strickland
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003

/s/ Paul Farmer
----------------------------
Paul Farmer
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Akbar H. Firdosy, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Infonet Services Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: February 9, 2004
null

279.79993
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3592 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to encourage the use of locally 

grown food in meal programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. BENNET introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to encourage 

the use of locally grown food in meal programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Locally Grown Foods 

5 for Older Americans Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOCALLY GROWN FOOD. 

7 Section 339(2) of the Older Americans Act of 1965 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (J), by striking ‘‘, and’’ 

10 and inserting a comma; 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3592 IS

1 (2) in subparagraph (K), by striking the period 

2 and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(L) where feasible, encourages the use of 

5 locally grown foods in meal programs and iden6 tifies potential partnerships and contracts with 

7 local producers and providers of locally grown 

8 foods.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered January 2 7 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01053

- CR

CARLOS EDUARDO SANCH EZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 2 65th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 17

- 00735

- R



### O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. We abated the appeal for a hearing on the reporter ’ s record. Before the Court is the tr ia l court’s request for additional time to hold the hearing and ma ke findings of fact. We GRANT the request and EXTEND the time until February 24 , 2020

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable J ennifer Bennett
, Presiding Judge, 265th District Court ; to court reporter Debi Harris; to court reporter Yolanda

Atkins ; and to all counsel for all parties. We again ABATE this appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated when we receive the supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’ s findings or when the Court de ems it appropriate to do so

.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3403 

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2012 

Mr. BOOZMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Tax Repeal 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle B of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to estate, gift, and genera9 tion-skipping taxes) is hereby repealed. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub11 section (a) shall apply to estates of decedents dying, gifts 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3403 IS

1 made, and generation-skipping transfers made after the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 8-4-11 Meeting with the Portland Cement Association and EPA on the 2011 

NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

On August 4, 2011, EPA met with Portland Cement Association to discuss their issues and 

concerns with the final rule entitled, “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That 

are Solid Waste,” which was published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 

15456). This is referred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. 

During that meeting, members from the Portland Cement Association expressed concerns with 

how ingredients would be regulated under the 2011 NHSM Final Rule and how the contaminant 

comparison part of the legitimacy criteria is intended to be implemented. EPA asked clarifying 

questions regarding the information presented. 

Expected Meeting Attendees

Members from the Portland Cement Association: 

Andrew Ohare 

Tyrone Wilson 

Other representatives may have been present 

EPA Invitees: 

Chair, Mathy Stanislaus 

Alan Carpien 

Jim Berlow 

Barry Breen 

Lisa Feldt 

John Michaud 

Suzanne Rudzinski 

Steven Silverman 

Matt Straus 

Peter Tsirigotis
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 4, 2011 

p0201 

Order 

 

February 4, 2011 

141708 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141708 

 COA: 247391 

Jackson CC: 02-002915-FC 

KATHERINE SUE DENDEL a/k/a 

KATHERINE SUE BURLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Bryant, 483 Mich 132 (2009), cert gtd __ US __; 130 S Ct 1685; 176 L 

Ed 2d 179 (2010), is pending before the United States Supreme Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case. 

 MARILYN KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.
(the ACompany@) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
AReport@), I, Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Douglas K. Beplate
Douglas K. Beplate, Principal Executive Officer

Date: March 21, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
a10a81.htm




Exhibit 10(a)81







SYSTEM EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


OF ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)







Certificate of Amendment







Amendment No. 2







THIS INSTRUMENT, executed this 15th day of December, 2011, but made effective January 27, 2011, constitutes the Second Amendment of the System Executive Retirement Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) (the “Plan”).







All capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 2 shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan unless otherwise herein defined.







Pursuant to Section 9.01 of the Plan and in accordance with the Resolutions of the Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors adopted at its meeting of January 27, 2011, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:








	
1.  

	
The last sentence of Plan Section 1.01 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:












Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term “Administrator” shall for Plan administrative purposes include the office of the senior-most System officer with responsibility for Human Resources and Administration, to whom the Personnel Committee has delegated the authority to act on its behalf with respect to all Plan administrative matters.








	
2.  

	
The last sentence of Plan Section 1.44 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:












Additionally, the term “Year of Service’ shall include any Years of imputed service or employment that the senior-most System officer with responsibility for Human Resources and Administration, in consultation with the Employer and in their sole discretion, may grant to a Participant in computing his benefit service (but for no other purposes unless specifically approved as above and set forth in the Participant Application) under this Plan.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Personnel Committee has caused this Second Amendment to the System Executive Retirement Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) to be executed by its duly authorized representative on the day, month, and year above set forth, but effective January 27, 2011.







 


ENTERGY CORPORATION


PERSONNEL COMMITTEE


through the undersigned duly authorized representative
















/s/ E. Renae Conley




E. Renae Conley


Executive Vice-President,


Human Resources and Administration
II 

Calendar No. 501 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3519 

To require sponsoring Senators to pay the printing costs of ceremonial and 

commemorative Senate resolutions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2012 

Mr. DEMINT (for himself, Mr. COBURN, Mr. CORKER, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, Mr. LEE, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. PAUL, Mr. RISCH, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; which was read 

the first time 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To require sponsoring Senators to pay the printing costs 

of ceremonial and commemorative Senate resolutions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay for Printing Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. SENATORS REQUIREMENT TO PAY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3519 PCS

1 (1) REQUIREMENT.—Except as provided in 

2 subsection (b), the sponsor of a ceremonial or com3 memorative Senate resolution shall reimburse the 

4 Government Printing Office for the total costs of 

5 printing such a resolution as determined by the Gov6 ernment Printing Office. 

7 (2) PAYMENT FROM MRA.—The reimbursement 

8 required by paragraph (1) shall be paid out of the 

9 sponsor’s Members’ Representative Allowance. 

10 (b) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply to a 

11 resolution sponsored by at least two-thirds of Senators, 

12 duly chosen and sworn. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 501 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3519 

A BILL 

To require sponsoring Senators to pay the printing 

resolutions. costs of ceremonial and commemorative Senate 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| July 29, 2009                  |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   |
|                                |   |
| /s/ Garth Wong                      |   |
| Garth Wong, Chief Financial Officer |

----
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
Case 19-01230-SMG Doc 368 Filed 09/29/23 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 In the conclusion of his brief, Cooper seems to assert a

double jeopardy claim, contending that, "[t]o the extent that prior

to obtaining the questioned criminal indictment here, if any, the

appellee ordered Cooper's property forfeited in connection with the

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-20373

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES OSCAR COOPER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-4161)

_________________________________________________________________

January 24, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Oscar Cooper, pro se, appeals the denial of his motion

for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He contends that the indictment

was defective for want of a "True Bill", and because it was signed

by an Assistant United States Attorney. He contends further that

he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on

appeal because, inter alia, counsel failed to challenge the

indictment and relied on unauthoritative and inapposite case law.1
instant illegal criminal arrest and prosecution, pursuant to Title

21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) ..., entered before the instant criminal

trial and sentence, mandates Cooper's release from prison under the

findings in May v. United States, No. A-95 CA 263 SS (W.D. Tex.

Austin, 1995)". Because this claim was not included in Cooper's §

2255 motion, we will not consider it here.

- 2 -

We have reviewed Cooper's contentions and the record, and find

no reversible error. The district court's denial of § 2255 relief

is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Hawksdale Financial Visions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for quarter year ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Christina Escobedo, President and Chief Executive Officer and
Director of the Company, certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: June 15, 2004                       By:  /s/ CHRISTINA ESCOBEDO
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Christina Escobedo
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          and Director
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposed New Listings of Substitutes; Changes of 

Listing Status; and Reinterpretation of Unacceptability for Closed Cell Foam Products 

under the Significant New Alternatives Policy Program; and Revision of Clean Air Act 

Section 608's Venting Prohibition for Propane 

Page 287 of317 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82 

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, 

Incorporation by reference, Recycling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Stratospheric 

ozone layer. 

MAR 2 9 2016 

Dated: -----------------------------------

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

Page 287 of3 I 7
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, José A. Collazo, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Infonet Services Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: February 9, 2004