alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3571 

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to conduct a small 

business review panel on the qualified mortgage rule before the Bureau 

can go forward with a final rule. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2012 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. CORKER, and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

to conduct a small business review panel on the qualified 

mortgage rule before the Bureau can go forward with 

a final rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SMALL BUSINESS REVIEW PANELS. 

4 (a) QUALIFIED MORTGAGE RULEMAKING EXCEP5 TION.—Section 1400(c) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street 

6 Reform and Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 

7 note) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3571 IS

1 ‘‘(4) QUALIFIED MORTGAGE RULE.—Nothing in 

2 this section, including the effective dates provided in 

3 paragraph (3), shall apply with respect to regula4 tions required to be issued under subsection (b) of 

5 section 129C of the Truth in Lending Act (15 

6 U.S.C. 1639c), as added by section 1412.’’. 

7 (b) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.— 

8 (1) TREATMENT OF REGULATION.—No regula9 tion prescribed under section 129C(b) of the Truth 

10 in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639c(b)) shall take ef11 fect unless and until the Bureau of Consumer Fi12 nancial Protection has convened a review panel and 

13 complied with the requirements of section 609 of 

14 title 5, United States Code. 

15 (2) EFFECTIVENESS OF REGULATION.—For 

16 purposes of section 609 of title 5, United States 

17 Code, each regulation prescribed under section 

18 129C(b) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

19 1639c(b)) shall be treated as a rule that will have 

20 a significant economic impact on a substantial num21 ber of small entities. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Landslides and related features, Alabama and Tennessee - Gadsden 1° x 2° sheet      

      January 1, 1982    

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Gadsden 1° x 2° sheet
                  - Alabama
                  -  Tennessee

View All **
Donald FOUNTAIN, Jr., Appellant/petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1859

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           LITHOPROBE East onshore-offshore seismic refraction survey -constraints on interpretation of reflection data in the Newfoundland Appalachians      

      January 1, 1994    

Combined onshore-offshore seismic refraction/ wide-angle reflection data have been acquired across Newfoundland, eastern Canada, to investigate the structural architecture of the northern Appalachians, particularly of distinct crustal zones recognized from earlier LITHOPROBE vertical incidence studies. A western crustal unit, correlated with the Grenville province of the Laurentian plate margin thins from 44 to 40 km and a portion of the lower crust becomes highly reflective with velocities of 7.2 km/s. In central Newfoundland, beneath the central mobile belt, the crust thins to 35 km or less and is marked by average continental velocities, not exceeding 7.0 km/s in the lower crust. Further east, in a crustal unit underlying the Avalon zone and associated with the Gondwanan plate margin, the crust is 40 km thick, and has velocities of 6.8 km/s in the lower crust. Explanations for the thin crust beneath the central mobile belt include (1) post-orogenic isostatic readjustment associated with a density in the mantle which is lower beneath this part of the orogen than beneath the margin, (2) mechanical thinning at the base of the crust during orogenic collapse perhaps caused by delamination, and (3) transformation by phase change of a gabbroic lower crust to eclogite which seismologically would be difficult to distinguish from mantle. Except for a single profile in western Newfoundland, velocities in the crust are of typical continental affinity with lower-crustal velocities less than 7.0 km/s. This indicates that there was no significant magmatic underplating under the Newfoundland Appalachians during Mesozoic rifting of the Atlantic Ocean as proposed elsewhere for the New England Appalachians. A mid-crustal velocity discontinuity observed in the Newfoundland region does not coincide with any consistent reflection pattern on vertical incidence profiles. However, we suggest that localized velocity heterogeneities at mid-crustal depths correspond to organized vertical incidence reflections. ?? 1994.

## Citation Information
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. §. 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SulphCo, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), Rudolf W. Gunnerman, Chairman of the Board of Directorsand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alan L. Austin, Jr., Principal Financial andAccounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350,as adopted pursuant to §. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |                                                                                 |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Rudolf W. Gunnerman                                                              |   |
|   | —————————————— |   |
|   | Rudolf W. Gunnerman                                                                  |   |
|   | Chairman of the Board of Directors                                                   |   |
|   | and Chief Executive Officer                                                          |   |
|   |                                                                                 |   |
|   |                                                                                 |   |
|   | February 8, 2005                                                                     |   |
|   |                                                                                 |   |
|   |                                                                                 |   |
|   | /s/  Alan L. Austin, Jr.                                                        |   |
|   | —————————————— |   |
|   | Alan L. Austin, Jr.                                                                  |   |
|   | Principal Financial                                                                  |   |
|   | and Accounting Officer                                                               |   |
|   |                                                                                 |   |
|   |                                                                                 |   |
|   | February 8, 2005                                                                     |   |

            This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §. 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           On the intensity of the magnetic superstorm of September 1909      

      December 9, 2018    

Analysis is made of solar observations and ground‐based magnetometer data recording space weather before and during the magnetic superstorm of 25 September 1909. From these data, it is inferred that the storm was initiated by an interplanetary coronal‐mass ejection having a mean Sun‐to‐Earth velocity of ~1,679 km/s. The commencement pressure on the magnetopause was ~32.4 nPa, sufficient to compress the subsolar magnetopause radius to ~5.9 Earth radii. Early on in the evolution of the storm, low‐latitude geomagnetic disturbance exhibited extreme longitudinal asymmetry, something that can be attributed to substorm activity extending to low latitudes. For this storm, Dst attained a minimum of −595 nT, comparable to that of the great magnetic storm of March 1989 (−589 nT; the most intense storm in terms of Dst of the space age). These results inform projects focused on understanding and mitigating the deleterious effects of extreme space‐weather events.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3670 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3670

    To prohibit the use of fiscal year 2013 funds for United States 
participation in joint military exercises with Egypt if the Government 
of Egypt abrogates, terminates, or withdraws from the 1979 Egypt-Israel 
                             peace treaty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2012

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the use of fiscal year 2013 funds for United States 
participation in joint military exercises with Egypt if the Government 
of Egypt abrogates, terminates, or withdraws from the 1979 Egypt-Israel 
                             peace treaty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Conditioning United States-Egypt 
Military Exercises Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. CONTINGENT LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FISCAL YEAR 2013 FUNDS 
              FOR UNITED STATES PARTICIPATION IN JOINT MILITARY 
              EXERCISES WITH EGYPT.

    (a) Limitation.--No amounts appropriated or otherwise available for 
fiscal year 2013 may be made used for United States participation in 
joint military exercises with Egypt if, during fiscal year 2013, the 
Government of Egypt abrogates, terminates, or withdraws from the 1979 
Egypt-Israel peace treaty signed at Washington, DC, on March 26, 1979.
    (b) Waiver.--The President may waive the limitation in subsection 
(a) if the President certifies to Congress in writing that the waiver 
is in the national security interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 20, 2019

a1113 

# Order

Clerk November 20, 2019

156022

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156022

COA: 337436

Oakland CC: 2015

- 255954

- FH;

WALTER ANDREW WALAS, 2015

- 255955

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 23, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the May 9, 2017

order of the Court of Ap peals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v

Ames (Docket No. 156077). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been denied in

Ames on June 26, 2019, 504 Mich 899 (2019), the application is again considered, and it

is DENIED, because w e are not persuaded that the questions presented should be

reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF**
 **CHIEF
        EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
        2002**
  I,
        Ian
        Long, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
        of
        Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act
        of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.
 Date:
                  October 15, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Ian
                  LongName:Ian
                  LongTitle:Chief
                    Executive Officer
  37
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 

P.O. Box 30260 

Lansing, Ml48909-7760 

Dear Ms. Fiedler: 

Thank you for your September 18, 2015 recommendations regarding the attainment status for areas in 

Michigan under the 2010 sulfur dioxide (S02) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). As you 

know, EPA is subject to a March 2, 2015 court order directing us to promulgate SOz designations for 

these areas under section 107 of the Clean Air Act by July 2, 2016. Specifically, we are required to 

promulgate designations for these areas because they contain sources meeting the SOz emissions 

criteria identified in the consent decree. The information you provided will greatly help us meet this 

duty, and ensure protection of public health in Michigan. 

In addition to the information you have provided, we have recently received modeling and related 

information from the Sierra Club that is relevant to a subset of the areas to be addressed by July 2, 2016. 

In your state, we have received information pertinent to the areas near the following power plants: St. 

Clair, Bel le River, and Monroe. We understand that you have received this information directly from the 

Sierra Club. Please let us know if you have any questions about the information we have received or if 

you need any additional information. 

I am writing to solicit your review of the information that Sierra Club has provided, so that the EPA can 

base its designations decisions on the best available information. The Clean Air Act provides for 

designations to be developed through a partnership of state agencies and EPA, however we also believe 

it is important to consider significant and relevant information that members of the public provide to us. 

Consistent with the structure of the Clean Air Act, we believe that the best first step in addressing this 

information would be for your agency to provide its review ofthis information. Particularly for the area 

near the Monroe plant, where the Sierra Club's recommendation differs from your recommendation, we 

would welcome your commentary generally on the information as well your detailed review of the 

elements of Sierra Club's analysis. To the extent practicable, we would appreciate quantitative 

comparisons of data used in Sierra Club's analysis compared to the data used in your analysis, to help us 

evaluate the elements of the two analyses. 

We would appreciate your review of Sierra Club's information by November 17, 2015. Your timely 

review would provide us valuable assistance in our review of your designation recommendations and 

development of our intended designations, which we are aiming to complete by the end of January 

2016. We will then publish notice of our intended designations for public comment, and, as required by 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (100% Post-Consumer) 
Air Programs Branch, Chief
Introductions/ Cheryl Bradley

 Roll Call Environmental Programs Manager 

 

 Update 

 

 Discussion 

 

 Closing Remarks 

 

 

Agenda

Regional Haze Planning

Wichita Mountains Wilderness Area

Oklahoma’s

 “The prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment to visibility.”

 

 September 25, 2007

 10:00 a.m.

 Conference Phone: 800-504-4496

 Pass Code: 3937085#

 707 N Robinson (PO Box 1677) Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101

 405 702 4100 FAX: 405 702 4101

The Air Quality Division of the Department of Environmental Quality

Consultation 3

 Contact: Cheryl Bradley cheryl.bradley@deq.state.ok.us
Exhibit 32.01
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Pacult, chief executive office and chief financial officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc., the Managing Member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC (the "Fund" or the "Registrant"), do hereby certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Fund;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

  (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

  (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
     Michael Pacult


Date:  March 30, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson                
|                      |  |  |  | Rodger L. Johnson                    
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
S. 3630 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 218 North 

Milwaukee Street in Waterford, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. Schiller 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN RHETT W. SCHILLER POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 218 North Milwaukee Street in Waterford, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. 

Schiller Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Captain Rhett W. Schiller Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.