alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.58

Amendment No. 9 to the Discover Financial Services
Directors’ Compensation Plan
Effective January 1, 2022, the Discover Financial Services Directors’ Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), is hereby amended in the following respects:


•The Plan is amended by replacing the text of Subsection 5(a)(ii) Subsequent Awards in Section 5 Initial and Annual Awards in its entirety with the following:


(ii)    Subsequent Awards.  As of the date of each Annual Meeting, each Eligible Director, including, without limitation, any Eligible Director who becomes a member of the Board by reason of being elected to the Board at such Annual Meeting, shall be entitled to receive a number of Restricted Stock Units equal to the number obtained by dividing $170,000 by the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on such day; provided, however, that such Eligible Director continues to serve as a director of the Company after such Annual Meeting.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a person becomes an Eligible Director on a date other than the date of an Annual Meeting, the equity award provided for in this Section 5(a)(ii) shall be granted on the date that such person becomes an Eligible Director, using the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on such date; provided, however, that such award shall be adjusted on a pro-rata basis by multiplying such award by a fraction where the numerator is the number of months between the date that such person becomes an Eligible Director and the date of the next Annual Meeting and the denominator is twelve (12). 


•The Plan is amended by replacing the text of Subsection 7(c) Committee Members in Section 7 Annual Retainers in its entirety with the following:


(c)    Committee Members. In addition to the Annual Retainer provided for in Section 7(a) and the Independent Chair and Committee Chairpersons fees provided for in Section 7(b), each Eligible Director, other than the Committee Chairperson, of the (i) Audit Committee shall be entitled to an annual Committee Member fee of $20,000; (ii) Compensation and Leadership Development Committee shall be entitled to an annual Committee Member fee of $15,000; (iii) Nominating and Governance Committee shall be entitled to an annual Committee Member fee of $10,000; and (iv) Risk Oversight Committee shall be entitled to an annual Committee Member fee of $20,000.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 24, 1995)]
[Corrections]
[Page 4662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X95-10124]



                                                    VOL. 60, NO. 15

                                          Tuesday, January 24, 1995

Federal Register/Vol. 60, No. 15/Tuesday, January 24, 1995/
Corrections
[[Page 4662]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Parts 611, 675, and 676

[Docket No. 941242-4342; I.D. 111494A]


Foreign Fishing; Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and 
Aleutian Islands; Limited Access Management of Federal Fisheries In and 
Off of Alaska

Correction

    In proposed rule document 94-30727 beginning on page 64383 in the 
issue of Wednesday, December 14, 1994 make the following correction:
    On page 64387, in Table 2, under the Non-roe season heading, in the 
60% column, in the Offshore and Total entries for the Aleutian Islands 
and in all entries for Bogoslof ``Do.'' should read ``Remainder''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 94F-0451]

The Shepherd Color Co., Filing of Food Additive Petition

Correction

    In notice document 95-838 appearing on page 2976, in the issue of 
Thursday, January 12, 1995, make the following correction:
    On page 2976, in the second column, in the signature line, in the 
first line, ``
Alan R. Rulis,'' should read ``
Alan M. Rulis,''.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 773

RIN 1029-AB34

Use of Applicant/Violator Computer System (AVS) in Surface Coal 
Mining and Reclamation Permit Approval; Standards and Procedures 
for Ownership and Control Determinations

Correction

    In the correction of rule document 94-26554 appearing on page 61656 
in the issue of Thursday, December 1, 1994, the CFR title should read 
as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Magnetic anomalies at high altitudes      

      June 1, 1951    

To investigate the effect of anomalies in the Earth's magnetic field at high altitudes, aeromagnetic maps of two representative areas showing isanomalic curves for total intensity are projected to levels of 10 and 20 miles above the surface of a plane Earth. The projections are accomplished by numerical computations and by use of a magnetic‐field projecting machine at the Naval Ordnance Laboratory. It is found that anomalies of 500 gammas near the surface of the Earth, in merging into neighboring anomalies, may produce effects of 100 gammas or more at an altitude of 20 miles.

## Citation Information
David W. ROBERTS and Royal Palm Properties, LLC, Appellants, v. CHRISTIE'S GREAT ESTATES, INC., n/k/a Christie's International Real Estate, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Rick S. Felberbaum, individually, and Felberbaum & Associates, P.A., a Florida professional association, Appellees.

No. 4D17-1416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 14, 2018]

Robert J. Hauser of Pankauski Hauser PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Alan B. Rose, Gregory S. Weiss, and L. Louis Mrachek of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, Konopka, Thomas & Weiss, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Christie's Great Estates, Inc., n/k/a Christie's International Real Estate, Inc.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Damoorgian, Kuntz, JJ., and Fahnestock, Fabienne, Associate Judge, concur.
The Honorable General James Rose Opinion No. H-915

Executive Director Texas Water Development Board Re: Effect of 1975 legisP. 0. Box 13087, Capitol Station lation on need for Harris Austin, Texas 78711 County Flood Control District to submit itsplans toTexas Water Development Board. Dear General Rose: In 1975 the 64thLegislature amended the statute which created theHarris County Flood Control District (article 8280-120, V.T.C.S.) by adding a section reading:

3A. Projects proposed tobe constructed by the Harris County Flood Control District, other than levees and structures related to levees, shall be under the control of theCommissioners Court acting as thegoverning board for theDistrict. The findings of the Commissioners Court as to theplan ofwork, the necessity, the location, and the type of improvement of aproject covered by this section shall be final and not subject to review. Acts 1975, 64thLeg., ch. 593at 1877. (Emphasisadded). Your office has asked if theHarris County Flood Control District is required to submit itsplans forprojects other than levees and structures related to levees to the Texas Water Development Board prior to construction of theprojects, andyou call our attention to sections 11.458 and 57.102 of the Texas Water Code.

p. 3838The Honorable General James Rose -page 2 (H-915)

The 1975 statute specifically provides that the findings of the Harris County Commissioners Court with regard to Harris County Flood Control District projects other than levees and structures related to levees are final and are not subject toreview. Accordingly, Harris County Flood Control District projects other than levees and structures related to levees are not required tobe submitted to the Texas Water Development Board prior to their construction.
We believe this interpretation reflects the intent of theLegislature, since the 1975 statute was enacted inapparent response to a 1974Attorney General Opinion [AttorneyGeneral Opinion H-328 (1974)lwhich indicated that certain proposals of thisDistrict were required tobe submitted to theTexas Water Development Board for itsapproval. SUMMARY The Harris County Flood Control District isnot required to submit itsplans for projects other than levees and structures relating to levees to theTexas Water Development Board._Very truly yours,

Attorney General of Texas APPROVED: TV

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee jwb

P. 3839
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Books 

#           Minerals, lands, and geology for the common defence and general welfare, Volume 2, 1879-1904 : A history of geology in relation to the development of public-land, federal-science, and mapping policies and the development of mineral resources in the United      

      January 1, 1980    

View Report

In the traditional view of the Survey's first 25 years, which are the subject of much of this volume, John Wesley Powell, with his broad view of science and advanced ideas of land and water in the West, is the heroic figure. Clarence King is dismissed as brilliant but with a limited view of science as mining geology, and Charles D. Walcott is regarded primarily as a brilliant paleontologist chosen by Powell to succeed him. The Survey's first quarter century, however, spanned a watershed in American history that separated a primarily rural and agrarian nation and a primarily urban and industrial nation, a nation intent on conquering the continent and isolated from the Old World and a nation involved in world politics, a nation that believed in the virtues of competition and limited government and a nation that saw the virtue of cooperation and insisted on reform and regulation to ensure equal opportunities to all. Science itself changed during this period. The age of instruments was just beginning when the Survey was established; by the turn of the century, instruments had almost revolutionized science and the era of the lone investigator had to give way to an era of organized effort in the solution of problems.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Science Analytics and Synthesis Program          

W 6th Ave Kipling StLakewood, CO80225United States
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Methods for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in Montana based on data through 1983      

      January 1, 1986    

View Document

Equations are presented for estimating flood magnitudes for ungaged sites in Montana based on data through 1983. The State was divided into eight regions based on hydrologic conditions, and separate multiple-regression equations were developed for each region. These equations relate annual flood magnitudes and frequencies to basin characteristics and are applicable only to natural-flow streams. In three of the regions, equations also were developed relating flood magnitudes and frequencies to basin characteristics and channel-geometry measurements. The standard errors of estimate for an exceedance probability of 1 percent ranged from 39 to 87 percent. Techniques are described for estimating annual flood-magnitude and flood-frequency information at ungaged sites based on data from gaged sites on the same stream. Included are curves relating flood-frequency information to drainage area for eight major streams in the State. Maximum known flood magnitudes in Montana are compared with estimated 1-percent-chance flood magnitudes and with maximum known floods in the United States.

Values of flood magnitudes for selected exceedance probabilities and values of significant basin characteristics and channel-geometry measurements for all gaging stations used in the analysis are tabulated. Included are 375 stations in Montana and 28 nearby stations in Canada and adjoining States.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Montana

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Mineral resource evaluation of the northeastern United States (Region 9)      

      January 1, 1998    

View Document

Mineral resources are essential to our society. For each person in the United States, approximately 10 tons of minerals are mined annually. Most of this consumption is of bulk mineral commodities (principally aggregates such as sand, gravel, and crushed stone) that are used locally, within about 30 miles of the site where they were mined. Every State mines and produces mineral aggregates.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Connecticut
                  -  Kentucky
                  -  Maine
                  -  Massachusetts
                  -  New Hampshire
                  -  New York
                  -  New Jersey
                  -  Pennsylvania
                  -  Ohio
                  -  Rhode Island
                  -  Tennessee
                  -  Vermont
                  -  West Virginia

View All **
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3408 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3408

    To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from enforcing regulations 
                pertaining to certain battery chargers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2012

  Mr. Johanns introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from enforcing regulations 
                pertaining to certain battery chargers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY EFFICIENCY REGULATIONS REGARDING CERTAIN BATTERY 
              CHARGERS.

    The Secretary of Energy may not finalize, implement, or enforce the 
proposed rule entitled ``Energy Conservation Program: Energy 
Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers and External Power 
Supplies'' (77 Fed. Reg. 18478 (March 27, 2012)), or any substantially 
similar regulation, with respect to product class 7 (as described in 
the proposed rule).
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3366 

To designate the Haqqani network as a foreign terrorist organization. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. BURR, Mr. WARNER, Mr. 

NELSON of Florida, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. 

BLUNT) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To designate the Haqqani network as a foreign terrorist 

organization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Secretary of State shall designate the Haqqani 

5 network as a foreign terrorist organization under section 

6 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

7 1189). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# F)LED Case No. DA 20-0377

) MICHAEL HUMMERT, ) ORDER HOLDING ) THE TIME REQUIREMENT Plaintiff and Appellant, ) IN ABEYANCE PENDING ) COMPLETION OF THE and ) MANDATORY ALTERNATNE ) DISPUTE RESOLUTION JERRY CHRISTISON, ) PROCESS

Defendant and Appellee. 

## SEP 2 5 2020
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State nf Mnntana

Upon the Stipulation of the parties to hold the time requirements ofthe Rules of Appellate Procedure in abeyance pending completion ofthe mandatory appellate alternative dispute resolution process, or the expiration ofthe 75 day time limit of Rule 7(3)(b) ofthe Rules of Appellate Procedure and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time requirements for completion ofthe mandatory appellate alternative dispute resolution process, or the expiration ofthe 75 day time limit of Rule 7(3)(b) ofthe Rules of Appellate Procedure shall be extended.

(1'‘•, Dated this 

### 2S- day of....i ' o? ,2020.

Order Holding the Time Requirement in Abeyance Pending Completion ofthe Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution Process — Page 1 09/25/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0377
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending  February 28, 2005, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Louis  Pardo dit
Pardau,  Chief  Executive  Officer (or the  equivalent  thereof) of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:


     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Date: June 15, 2005

/s/ Louis Pardau dit Pardo
Louis Pardau dit Pardo
Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent)








-----------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Poseidis,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending  February 28, 2005, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Ludovic Payage, Chief
Financial Officer (or the equivalent thereof) of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:


     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Date: June 15, 2005

/s/ Ludovic Payage
Ludovic Payage
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent)






-----------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Nos. 333-134830, 333-132536, 333-127039, and 333-113244 on Form S-8 of
our report dated November 13, 2006, relating to the financial statements of
Amazon Biotech, Inc., which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Amazon Biotech, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2006.


/s/ Meyler & Company, LLC

Meyler & Company, LLC
Middletown, New Jersey
November 14, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Life histories, salinity zones, and sublethal contributions of contaminants to pelagic fish declines illustrated with a case study of San Francisco Estuary, California, USA      

      March 20, 2012    

Human effects on estuaries are often associated with major decreases in abundance of aquatic species. However, remediation priorities are difficult to identify when declines result from multiple stressors with interacting sublethal effects. The San Francisco Estuary offers a useful case study of the potential role of contaminants in declines of organisms because the waters of its delta chronically violate legal water quality standards; however, direct effects of contaminants on fish species are rarely observed. Lack of direct lethality in the field has prevented consensus that contaminants may be one of the major drivers of coincident but unexplained declines of fishes with differing life histories and habitats (anadromous, brackish, and freshwater). Our review of available evidence indicates that examining the effects of contaminants and other stressors on specific life stages in different seasons and salinity zones of the estuary is critical to identifying how several interacting stressors could contribute to a general syndrome of declines. Moreover, warming water temperatures of the magnitude projected by climate models increase metabolic rates of ectotherms, and can hasten elimination of some contaminants. However, for other pollutants, concurrent increases in respiratory rate or food intake result in higher doses per unit time without changes in the contaminant concentrations in the water. Food limitation and energetic costs of osmoregulating under altered salinities further limit the amount of energy available to fish; this energy must be redirected from growth and reproduction toward pollutant avoidance, enzymatic detoxification, or elimination. Because all of these processes require energy, bioenergetics methods are promising for evaluating effects of sublethal contaminants in the presence of other stressors, and for informing remediation. Predictive models that evaluate the direct and indirect effects of contaminants will be possible when data become available on energetic costs of exposure to contaminants given simultaneous exposure to non-contaminant stressors.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Larry Brown (Former Employee)          

##### Research Biologist

California Water Science Center

## Related Content

####             Larry Brown (Former Employee)          

##### Research Biologist

California Water Science Center

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Sacramento Projects Office (USGS California Water Science Center)          

6000 J Street, Placer HallSacramento, CA95819United States

916-278-3000

916-278-3070

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - san francisco estuary
                  - california

View All **