alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40824

Summary Calendar

 

RAY COLGROVE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

C.W. MARTIN, Warden; JAMES A. LYNAUGH;

UNIDENTIFIED BENNETT; and ANDY

COLLINS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:94-CV-11

-- - - - - - - - - 

March 22, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ray Colgrove appeals the district court’s 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(d) dismissal of his pro se, in forma pauperis (IFP), 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action. Colgrove did not allege sufficient facts

to demonstrate that prisoners were aware of facts that a

substantial risk of harm existed regarding his failure-to-protect
No. 95-40824

- 2 -

claim. Therefore, Colgrove does not demonstrate that the

defendants were deliberately indifferent to his right to be free 

from the violence of other inmates. See Farmer v. Brennan, 114

S. Ct. 1970, 1979 (1994). Colgrove has also failed to

demonstrate that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to

his serious medical needs. See Mendoza v. Lynaugh, 989 F.2d 191,

193 (5th Cir. 1993).

We warn Colgrove that the filing of frivolous appeals will

result in additional sanctions. E.g., Smith v. McCleod, 946 F.2d

417, 418 (5th Cir. 1991); Jackson v. Carpenter, 921 F.2d 68, 69

(5th Cir. 1991). If Colgrove has any other appeals pending in

this court at this time, he should review them in light of the

foregoing warning and move to withdraw any appeal that is

frivolous.

AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001096688
<NAME>                        NETWORTHUSA.Com, Inc.

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         10,655
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,225
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          80,449
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        8,500
<OTHER-SE>                                    (77,304)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,645
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,846
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               63,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (61,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (61,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (61,786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3519 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 501
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3519

To require sponsoring Senators to pay the printing costs of ceremonial 
                 and commemorative Senate resolutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2012

    Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Corker, Mr. Johnson of 
Wisconsin, Mr. Lee, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Paul, Mr. Risch, Mr. Sessions, 
and Mr. Toomey) introduced the following bill; which was read the first 
                                  time

                           September 10, 2012

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require sponsoring Senators to pay the printing costs of ceremonial 
                 and commemorative Senate resolutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pay for Printing Act''.

SEC. 2. SENATORS REQUIREMENT TO PAY.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Requirement.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
        sponsor of a ceremonial or commemorative Senate resolution 
        shall reimburse the Government Printing Office for the total 
        costs of printing such a resolution as determined by the 
        Government Printing Office.
            (2) Payment from mra.--The reimbursement required by 
        paragraph (1) shall be paid out of the sponsor's Members' 
        Representative Allowance.
    (b) Exception.--This section shall not apply to a resolution 
sponsored by at least two-thirds of Senators, duly chosen and sworn.
                                                       Calendar No. 501

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3519

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To require sponsoring Senators to pay the printing costs of ceremonial 
                 and commemorative Senate resolutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 10, 2012

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re: Case No.: 18-16248-MAM

CHANCE & ANTHEM, LLC Chapter 7

Debtor.

_______________________________/

Robert Furr, Ad. Proc. No. 19-01298-MAM

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Robert Gibson, et.al., 

Defendants. 

_______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ECF NO. 108)

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel 

for Robert Gibson (ECF No. 108) (the “Motion”) on November 14, 2019. 

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 20, 2019.

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 129 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 2
The Court, having reviewed the Motion and having heard argument of all 

respective counsel as well as Mr. Gibson, and being fully advised in the premises, hereby 

ORDERS that: 

The Motion is granted. Ms. Colman/Baritz & Colman LLP are hereby relieved of all 

obligations as counsel for Mr. Gibson. In the event Mr. Gibson elects to retain new 

counsel, he shall do so within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order. The 

continued deposition of Mr. Gibson, previously scheduled and coordinated for December 

6, 2019 shall proceed whether or not Mr. Gibson obtains new counsel.

###

Copy furnished to: 

Nancy B. Colman, Esq. 

(Attorney Colman is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon all interested parties and 

file a certificate of service)

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 129 Filed 11/20/19 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mapping marginal croplands suitable for cellulosic feedstock crops in the Great Plains, United States      

      September 14, 2016    

Growing cellulosic feedstock crops (e.g., switchgrass) for biofuel is more environmentally sustainable than corn-based ethanol. Specifically, this practice can reduce soil erosion and water quality impairment from pesticides and fertilizer, improve ecosystem services and sustainability (e.g., serve as carbon sinks), and minimize impacts on global food supplies. The main goal of this study was to identify high-risk marginal croplands that are potentially suitable for growing cellulosic feedstock crops (e.g., switchgrass) in the US Great Plains (GP). Satellite-derived growing season Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, a switchgrass biomass productivity map obtained from a previous study, US Geological Survey (USGS) irrigation and crop masks, and US Department of Agriculture (USDA) crop indemnity maps for the GP were used in this study. Our hypothesis was that croplands with relatively low crop yield but high productivity potential for switchgrass may be suitable for converting to switchgrass. Areas with relatively low crop indemnity (crop indemnity <$2 157 068) were excluded from the suitable areas based on low probability of crop failures. Results show that approximately 650 000 ha of marginal croplands in the GP are potentially suitable for switchgrass development. The total estimated switchgrass biomass productivity gain from these suitable areas is about 5.9 million metric tons. Switchgrass can be cultivated in either lowland or upland regions in the GP depending on the local soil and environmental conditions. This study improves our understanding of ecosystem services and the sustainability of cropland systems in the GP. Results from this study provide useful information to land managers for making informed decisions regarding switchgrass development in the GP.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - United States

View All **
# C_2004224EN.01000701.xml

| 8.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3540 — CERBERUS/GDX)

(2004/C 224/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3540. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3540. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

419 

KA 15-00648 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES C. JONES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY (KELLY M. BALCOM

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D.

Ploetz, J.), rendered January 12, 2015. The judgment revoked

defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of

imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the

sentence of probation imposed upon his conviction of driving while

intoxicated as a class E felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [3];

1193 [1] [c] [i] [A]), and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of

imprisonment of one to three years. We note at the outset that,

contrary to the People’s contention, defendant’s waiver of the right

to appeal at the underlying plea proceeding does not preclude our

review of his contentions on this appeal following the revocation of

his probation (see generally People v Williams, 140 AD3d 1749, 1750,

lv denied 28 NY3d 975; People v Rodriguez, 259 AD2d 1040, 1040).

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that

County Court erred in failing to order an updated presentence report

before sentencing defendant upon his admission to violating probation

(see People v Stachnik, 101 AD3d 1590, 1592, lv denied 20 NY3d 1104). 

In any event, the court was sufficiently familiar with defendant’s

status and his conduct while on probation that an updated report was

not required to enable it to perform its sentencing function, inasmuch

as the court was informed that defendant had pleaded guilty in another

county to a new charge of driving while intoxicated committed while he

was on probation (see id. at 1592; People v Perry, 278 AD2d 933, 933,

lv denied 96 NY2d 866; cf. People v Klinkowski, 281 AD2d 972, 973, lv

denied 96 NY2d 831). We further conclude that defendant was not

denied effective assistance of counsel by his attorney’s failure to
-2- 419 

KA 15-00648 

request an updated presentence report (see People v Williams, 114 AD3d

993, 994, lv denied 23 NY3d 969; see generally People v Ward, 25 AD3d

727, 727, lv denied 7 NY3d 764). Finally, the sentence is not unduly

harsh or severe. 

Entered: March 31, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Local tsunamis and earthquake source parameters      

      January 1, 1998    

This chapter establishes the relationship among earthquake source parameters and the generation, propagation, and run-up of local tsunamis. In general terms, displacement of the seafloor during the earthquake rupture is modeled using the elastic dislocation theory for which the displacement field is dependent on the slip distribution, fault geometry, and the elastic response and properties of the medium. Specifically, nonlinear long-wave theory governs the propagation and run-up of tsunamis. A parametric study is devised to examine the relative importance of individual earthquake source parameters on local tsunamis, because the physics that describes tsunamis from generation through run-up is complex. Analysis of the source parameters of various tsunamigenic earthquakes have indicated that the details of the earthquake source, namely, nonuniform distribution of slip along the fault plane, have a significant effect on the local tsunami run-up. Numerical methods have been developed to address the realistic bathymetric and shoreline conditions. The accuracy of determining the run-up on shore is directly dependent on the source parameters of the earthquake, which provide the initial conditions used for the hydrodynamic models.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

## Related Content

#### Eric Geist

##### Research Geophysicist

Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center

egeist@usgs.gov

650-439-2457

### Contact

####               Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center          

2885 Mission StreetSanta Cruz, CA95060United States

831-460-7401

### Explore Search

                  - Geology

View All **
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 39705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16454]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9696-4]

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463, 
EPA gives notice of a public meeting of the National Advisory Council 
for Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides 
advice to the EPA Administrator on a broad range of environmental 
policy, technology, and management issues. NACEPT represents diverse 
interests from academia, industry, non-governmental organizations, and 
state, local, and tribal governments. The purpose of this meeting is to 
continue developing recommendations to the Administrator regarding 
actions that EPA can take in response to the National Academy of 
Sciences Report on ``Incorporating Sustainability in the U.S 
Environmental Protection Agency.'' A copy of the agenda for the meeting 
will be posted at http://www.epa.gov/ofacmo/nacept/cal-nacept.htm.

DATES: NACEPT will hold a two-day public meeting on Thursday, August 2, 
2012, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. (ET) and Friday, August 3, 2012, from 
8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m. (ET).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the EPA East Building, Room 
2138, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Joyce, Acting Designated Federal 
Officer, joyce.mark@epa.gov, (202) 564-2130, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach (1601M), 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make oral comments or to provide 
written comments to NACEPT should be sent to Eugene Green at 
green.eugene@epa.gov by Thursday, July 26, 2012. The meeting is open to 
the public, with limited seating available on a first-come, first-
served basis. Members of the public wishing to attend should contact 
Eugene Green at green.eugene@epa.gov or (202) 564-2432 by July 26, 
2012.
    Meeting Access: Information regarding accessibility and/or 
accommodations for individuals with disabilities should be directed to 
Eugene Green at the email address or phone number listed above. To 
ensure adequate time for processing, please make requests for 
accommodations at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: June 25, 2012.
Mark Joyce,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-16454 Filed 7-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Samuel W. BALLINGER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REGIONS BANK, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Board of Directors Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.47 
 Domino’s Pizza, Inc. 
 Independent Director Compensation Schedule

 The following table sets forth the compensation received by independent directors of Domino’s Pizza, Inc.: 

 

			
	 Compensation Type
	  	Amount
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$50,000 per year
	 Board of Directors Meeting Fee
	  	$2,000 per meeting
	 Committee Meeting Fee
	  	$1,500 per meeting
	 Audit Chairperson Retainer
	  	$20,000 per year
	 Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer
	  	$15,000 per year
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson Retainer
	  	$10,000 per year
	 Annual Restricted Stock Grant
	  	2,990 shares per year
Case 19-22057-RAM Doc 1 Filed 09/10/19 Page 1 of 3
09/10/2019

Case 19-22057-RAM Doc 1 Filed 09/10/19 Page 2 of 3
/s/ Gary M. Freedman

09/10/2019

Case 19-22057-RAM Doc 1 Filed 09/10/19 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ohio Legacy Corp (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    L. DWIGHT
DOUCE                         
|L. Dwight Douce,                               
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director



|    | 
|--- | 
|By: | 
|    | 
|    | 



August 8, 2003
Exhibit 1 

Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 382-1 Filed 12/21/20 Page 1 of 3
1

Samantha Powell (7663)

From: Robert Lewis <robert@rmllaw.com>

Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 2:24 PM

To: Bret Feldman (7879)

Cc: Caroline Catchpole Spradlin (7672)

Subject: Resolution Re SWS -v- Meridian Marina and Mullen / Case #: 2019-CA-8689

Dear Mr. Feldman: 

Thank you for taking time with me earlier today and discussing resolution of this matter. 

As advised, my clients are able and willing to settle this matter for the total sum of $32,000. If this amount is acceptable 

as full and final settlement, my clients will ensure an “Undisputed Proof of Claim” on behalf of SWS Environmental 

Services in the pending bankruptcy matter (Case #: 19-18585-MAM/ Chapter 11), which will secure the "undisputed 

claim” in the amount of $32,000, to which, shall be paid in full on or before December 31, 2020. Upon receipt of 

payment, simply file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. 

As time is of the essence in the bankruptcy matter, please advise in writing, by this Friday, November 20, 2020 if the 

above is acceptable or not. 

Thank you in advance for your timely response. 

Sincerely, 

Robert M. Lewis, Esquire 

Law Office of Robert M. Lewis, LLC 

P.O. Box 1831 

Jupiter, Florida 33468 

Phone: 561-575-1606 

Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 382-1 Filed 12/21/20 Page 2 of 3
2

This e-mail may contain PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the Addressee(s). If you are 

not the intended recipient of this e-mail, an employee, or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, 

you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me and destroy this e-mail. 

Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 382-1 Filed 12/21/20 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 158 

Confidential Exhibit To Be Submitted At Trial Pursuant To Order Granting In Part And 

Denying In Part Jeffrey Siskind’s Emergency Motion For Protective Order Prohibiting 

The Release Of Confidential Client Financial Information [ECF No. 121] [ECF No. 

180] Bankruptcy Court For The Southern District Of Florida – Case No. 18-16248 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 478-11 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1