alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE**

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Quest Software, Inc. 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-82784, 333-38002, 333-49668, 333-91429, 333-96183, 333-103010, and333-107045 on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 333-46648 on Form S-3; and Registration Statement No. 333-63596 on Form S-4 of Quest Software, Inc., of our report dated March 9, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph referring to a change in accounting method) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quest Software, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the financialstatement schedule of Quest Software, Inc. and subsidiaries, listed in Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In ouropinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

 

/S/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

March 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,818
<SECURITIES>                                    10,014
<RECEIVABLES>                                      171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,654
<PP&E>                                           6,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                     904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,931
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,360
<SALES>                                          3,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,756
<CGS>                                            2,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (52,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (52,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (52,645)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (4.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.13)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 19230)    
Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the National Advisory Council for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NACCAM) meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals and the discussion could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Advisory Council for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         May 5, 2009.                    

*Closed:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Teleconference).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Martin H. Goldrosen, PhD, Executive Secretary, Director, Division of Extramural Activities, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2014.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to scheduling conflicts.

Dated: April 22, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-9681 Filed 4-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

In re: CASE NO.: 19-22760-RAM

Lazaro Valle Molina CHAPTER 13

 

 Debtor(s) /

ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO CLAIM #9 FILED BY FREEDOM ROAD 

FINANCIAL

THIS CASE came on to be heard on February 11, 2020 on the Debtor’s Objection to Claim 

#9 filed by Freedom Road Financial (DE#25), and based upon the record, it is:

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Debtor’s Objection to Claim #9 is sustained.

2. That Claim #9 is allowed and reclassified as unsecured claim in the amount of 

$32,957.60.

(###)

Submitted By:

Law Offices of Patrick L Cordero, Esq.

Attorney for Debtor(s).

7333 Coral Way

Miami, Florida 33155

Tel: (305) 445-4855

 /s/ (FILED CM/ECF) 

PATRICK L. CORDERO, ESQ.

FL Bar No. 801992

Patrick L. Cordero, Esquire is directed to furnish a conformed copy of this order to all interested 

parties.

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 10, 2020.

Case 19-22760-RAM Doc 49 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby
certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |  |  |  |                                                   
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: November 5, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ M. Todd Holt                                  
|                        |  |  |  | M. Todd Holt President and
Chief Financial Officer
### NUMBER 13

- 1 6

- 00 235

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

ALEXANDER TORRES A/K/A ALEX TORRES , Appellant,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 1 17 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Alexander Torres a/k/a Alex Torres , attempts to appeal his conviction

for assault . The trial court has certified that this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the
defendant has NO right of appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).2

On April 26, 2016 , this Court notified appellant ’ s counsel of the trial court ’ s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel ’ s findings
as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

exi stence of any amended certification.

On June 1, 2016 , counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel ’ s response
does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that

appellant otherwise has a right to appe al.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are likewise DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 9th day of June, 2016

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NT Mining Corporation. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jordan Wangh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Jordan WanghJordan WanghChief Executive OfficerNovember 19, 2009

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2010 |  | /s/ M. Todd Holt                     
|                      |  | M. Todd Holt                         
|                      |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 333 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

AN ACT 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving the Little 

Wood River Ranch. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 333 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN3 VOLVING LITTLE WOOD RIVER RANCH. 

4 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

5 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

6 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com7 mission project numbered 12063, the Federal Energy 

8 Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the li9 censee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in 

10 accordance with the procedures of the Commission under 

11 that section— 

12 (1) extend the time period during which the li13 censee is required to commence the construction of 

14 project works to the end of the 3-year period begin15 ning on the date of enactment of this Act; or 

16 (2) if the license for Project No. 12063 has 

17 been terminated, reinstate the license and extend the 

18 time period during which the licensee is required to 

19 commence the construction of project works to the 

20 end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of en21 actment of this Act. 

Passed the Senate October 18, 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2I, Karim Hirji, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oilsands Quest Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andhave: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions containedin SEC Release 34-47986] (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors; (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        March 14, 2008 /s/ Karim Hirji   Karim Hirji, Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1648

In Re: GEORGE W. GANTT-EL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:09-cv-00040-UA-DPD)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George W. Gantt-El, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George W. Gantt-El petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to stop denying him access to court in his habeas corpus proceeding. We

conclude that Gantt-El is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. &

Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The relief sought by Gantt-El is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We deny Gantt-El’s motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary and deny his motion for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The Jupiter system through the eyes of Voyager 1      

      January 1, 1979    

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

## Related Content

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

### Contacts

#### Laurence  Soderblom, PhD

##### Geophysicist 

Astrogeology Science Center

astro_outreach@usgs.gov

555-555-5555

### Explore Search

                  - Callisto
                  -  Europa
                  -  Ganymede
                  -  Io
                  -  Jupiter

View All **
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 6 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 7 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 8 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 9 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 10 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 11 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 12 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 13 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 14 of 15
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-32 Filed 10/22/20 Page 15 of 15
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Lithofacies and seismic-reflection interpretation of temperate glacimarine sedimentation in Tarr Inlet, Glacier Bay, Alaska      

      January 1, 1997    

High-resolution seismic-reflection profiles of sediment fill within Tart Inlet of Glacier Bay, Alaska, show seismic facies changes with increasing distance from the glacial termini. Five types of seismic facies are recognized from analysis of Huntec and minisparker records, and seven lithofacies are determined from detailed sedimentologic study of gravity-, vibro- and box-cores, and bottom grab samples. Lithofacies and seismic facies associations, and fjord-floor morphology allow us to divide the fjord into three sedimentary environments: ice-proximal, iceberg-zone and ice-distal. The ice-proximal environment, characterized by a morainal-bank depositional system, can be subdivided into bank-back, bank-core and bank-front subenvironments, each of which is characterized by a different depositional subsystem. A bank-back subsystem shows chaotic seismic facies with a mounded surface, which we infer consists mainly of unsorted diamicton and poorly sorted coarse-grained sediments. A bank-core depositional subsystem is a mixture of diamicton, rubble, gravel, sand and mud. Seismic-reflection records of this subsystem are characterized by chaotic seismic facies with abundant hyperbolic diffractions and a hummocky surface. A bank-front depositional subsystem consists of mainly stratified and massive sand, and is characterized by internal hummocky facies on seismic-reflection records with significant surface relief and sediment gravity flow channels. The depositional system formed in the iceberg-zone environment consists of rhythmically laminated mud interbedded with thin beds of weakly stratified diamicton and stratified or massive sand and silt. On seismic-reflection profiles, this depositional system is characterized by discontinuously stratified facies with multiple channels on the surface in the proximal zone and a single channel on the largely flat sediment surface in the distal zone. The depositional system formed in the ice-distal environment consists of interbedded homogeneous or laminated mud and massive or stratified sand and coarse silt. This depositional system shows continuously stratified seismic facies with smooth and flat surfaces on minisparker records, and continuously stratified seismic facies which are interlayered with thin weakly stratified facies on Huntec records.

## Citation Information