alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3597 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to increase and adjust for inflation the 

maximum value of articles that may be imported duty-free by one person 

on one day, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to increase and adjust 

for inflation the maximum value of articles that may 

be imported duty-free by one person on one day, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Low Value Shipment 

5 Regulatory Modernization Act of 2012’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3597 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AND ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION OF 

2 MAXIMUM VALUE OF ARTICLES THAT MAY BE 

3 IMPORTED DUTY-FREE BY ONE PERSON ON 

4 ONE DAY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 321 of the Tariff Act of 

6 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1321) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking subpara8 graph (C) and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(C) in any other case, the dollar amount 

10 specified in subsection (c).’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(c) ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT OF VALUE OF ARTICLES

13 THAT MAY ENTER DUTY-FREE.— 

14 ‘‘(1) DOLLAR AMOUNT SPECIFIED.—The dollar 

15 amount specified in this subsection is— 

16 ‘‘(A) for calendar year 2013, $800; and 

17 ‘‘(B) subject to paragraph (2), for any cal18 endar year after calendar year 2013, an amount 

19 equal to $800 increased by an amount equal 

20 to— 

21 ‘‘(i) $800, multiplied by 

22 ‘‘(ii) the percentage of the increase (if 

23 any) in the Consumer Price Index for the 

24 preceding calendar year compared to the 

25 Consumer Price Index for calendar year 

26 2012. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3597 IS

1 ‘‘(2) ROUNDING.—Any increase under para2 graph (1) of the dollar amount specified in this sub3 section shall be rounded to the nearest increment of 

4 $50. 

5 ‘‘(3) CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR ANY CAL6 ENDAR YEAR.—For purposes of this subsection, the 

7 Consumer Price Index for any calendar year is the 

8 average of the Consumer Price Index as of the close 

9 of the 12-month period ending on September 30 of 

10 that calendar year. 

11 ‘‘(4) CONSUMER PRICE INDEX DEFINED.—For 

12 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘Consumer 

13 Price Index’ means the last Consumer Price Index 

14 for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau 

15 of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from 

18 warehouse for consumption, on or after January 1, 2013. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel. SRSP Conflicts.                    

*Date:*                         June 11, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marina Broitman, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6153, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608. 301-402-8152.                         *mbroitma@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 22, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-9860 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Karl Ronald MENZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-4967

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1499

DAVID L. JOHNSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (CA-00-108-2)

Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: November 5, 2001

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason E. Huber, FORMAN & CRANE, L.C., Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellant. James A. Winn, Regional Chief Counsel, Region III,

Kenneth DiVito, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the General

Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Kelly R. Curry,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David L. Johnston appeals from the district court’s order upholding the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny

Johnston’s application for disability insurance benefits. We have

reviewed the record, the briefs, and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Johnston v. Massanari, No. CA-00-108-2 (S.D.W. Va.

Feb. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NADER + MUSEU I LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COLLEGE, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D17-149

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018.

Greenspoon Marder LLP, and William W. Riley, Jr. and Pedro M. Villa, for appellant.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Albert E. Dotson, Jr., Eric Singer, Elise M. Holtzman, and Eileen Ball Mehta, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,569
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      6,109
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         40,935
<ALLOWANCE>                                        738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,161
<DEPOSITS>                                      43,889
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,631
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                237
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  54,161
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,207
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  374
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   123
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,704
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,158
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,210
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,494
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      221
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    468
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         558
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (59)
<NET-INCOME>                                       499
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.96
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   520
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        8
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  738
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               738
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10684

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MECO DONYA DEERE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-314-2

Before ELROD, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Meco Donya Deere

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Deere has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 2, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10684 Document: 00515255827 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2020
No. 19-10684

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10684 Document: 00515255827 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2020
# C23Dto.



# C‘•(:(\fl)LA5EIIMAGINGSYS1SMS,INC.(717)25-17OOç’tnr1054*545004456841007ProofofadvertisingIntheformofatearsheetmustbeincludedonParts1,2&3.Returnoriginalandtwocopiessignedbytheeditororpublisher)toAgencylistedabove.PartImustbenotarized.Part4isyours.Commcnweafthtobebilledonlyforactualnumberofprintedlinespublished. 

# OGn,,JWI4J4A



# /CCFNNVREV.148J’Jl3LlCATIONSIHORIZATIONITobecombletedbyeáencv1,ersid8S505N0WSP.?E8)10MarkeyStreetNorriatown,PA1940Attn:NancyI(ulpPUSIJcATION.AUTHQRIZATIONANDINVOICEL 

# 152170(9495BureauoAirQualit.y00MarketSt.,12thFir.[arrlslnirg,PA17105You,asvendor,areauthorizedtopublishthisadvertisementInyournewspaper1subjecttothetermsofthisdrder,asfolIowsAdvertisementtobepublishedinregularadvertisingcolumns,nopositionspecified;captionoftwolinesandsignaturetobeincapitalsandsubjectmatterandtitleofofficer.tôbesetsolidintypjjjyusedby_yjiparforpj,(gal)chargetobemadeattheratechargedtoandiaidbycommercialadvertisersformattersimilarlysetandoccupyingsimilarspace;advertisementtoberunintheeditionsspecifiedabove.Vendoragreesthat,intheperformanceofanycontractawardedtoithereunder,saidvendorwillnotdiscriminateagainstanyempioyeorotherpersonsonaccountofrace,color,sex,religiouscreed,ancestry,ageornationaloriginandthattheCommonwealth,uponreceiptofsatisfactoryevidenceofsuchdiscrimInation,shallhavetherighttocancelsaidcontractReturnthiscopyatonceifyouwillnotacceptthisadvertisementunderthetermssetforth.ACCOUNT



# F

1019500*1FUNCTIONOJ—R14c,UNICODEcFOoIINVOICE(Tobecompletedbypubllshcrli__..________..OATSOF1NGERtIONAJALNOOFPRINTSDIJNS*COSTPERiNTlTOTAL.M4OUNT..1Ad_-2ndAd__QSL_c3rdAd.-.—-,—-———-..----.--..-



# 13PASTETEARSHEETHERECornCountyof____came______Beforeme,thebscriber,aotaryPutioir:ridfor__________whobgdulysworn,d___________________________________________________theLJI72.Ssaythathe8generalnewspaperpublishedat—-thattheadvertisement.IwhichtearsheetIsattachedhereto,waspublishedintheregularadverifrr’c1.ihinsofsaiddvpaper,’intheeditionsofsaidnewspaper,inallrasptsasorderedandinvoicedabove;andthattheCommonwealthisnotchargedthereforataratehigherthanIschargedanyordinarycommercialadvertiserforasimilaramountofmatteroccupyingsimilarspaceendsetinasimilarmanner,insaidnewspaper4beforemethis2QM,iui________________________COMMOJyOFPSYLWU’JI,(JOOTANYNOTARY?tJ8UINo,STO1tNotaryPji,



# 1[MyComnde6merYCowdY



# IAJ4.’P,Qi,sI-,ii/4A/)Q1r(’fl
EXHIBIT 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



The undersigned hereby certifies that the annual report on Form 10-K of International Shipping Enterprises, Inc. (the Registrant) for the year ended December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                       |  |                                            
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: February 2, 2005 |  | /s/ Angeliki Frangou                       
|                       |  | Angeliki Frangou                           
|                       |  | Chairman of the Board, Chief               
|                       |  | Executive Officer, and President           
|                       |  | (Principal executive and financial officer)
Exhibit 10.27.1

 

	

    	
Western Coal Corp.
    
	
Suite 1000 - 885   Dunsmuir Street
    
	
Vancouver, BC V6C 1N5
    
	
 
    
	
www.walterenergy.com
    


 

October 28, 2011

 

Attention: James (Jim) Griffin

RE: Change of Terms and conditions of employment

 

Dear Jim,

 

This is to confirm our conversation earlier this week when I informed you that we are pleased to confirm the following terms:

 

1.       Until December 31, 2012 you will be entitled to 2 family unification trips per month. The Company will meet any tax obligations as a result of this;

 

2.       The Company will continue to provide you with accommodations until December 31, 2012. The Company will meet any tax obligations as a result of this;

 

3.       You will be eligible to receive tax consultations with the Company’s Canadian tax service provider for the 2011 and 2012 tax years. You are responsible for ensuring that you understand the tax implications directly associated with your personal assets and investments.

 

4.       Your salary will be paid in US dollars; and

 

5.       All benefits, terms and conditions of your employment agreement will remain in effect and unchanged. (except as stated in the extension letter dated Oct. 28, 2011) 

 

Please sign a copy of this letter in the space provided and return to Tanya McCarthy, Human Resources Business Partner. Thank you.

 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Graham Foyle-Twining
    	
 
    
	
Graham Foyle-Twining
    	
 
    
	
Global Head of HR and Organizational Development
    	
 
    


 

I accept the offer as outlined above.

 

	
/s/ James (Jim) Griffin
    	
 
    	
Nov. 9, 2011
    
	
James (Jim) Griffin
    	
 
    	
Date
Case 19-23184    Doc 1    Filed 10/01/19    Page 1 of 5

Case 19-23184    Doc 1    Filed 10/01/19    Page 2 of 5

Case 19-23184    Doc 1    Filed 10/01/19    Page 3 of 5

Case 19-23184    Doc 1    Filed 10/01/19    Page 4 of 5

Case 19-23184    Doc 1    Filed 10/01/19    Page 5 of 5
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the date and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: March 14, 2008 |   |   | /s/      Dorothy Wong              |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   | Dorothy      WongChief      Accounting Officer                                                      |
EXHIBIT 159 

Confidential Exhibit To Be Submitted At Trial Pursuant To Order Granting In Part And 

Denying In Part Jeffrey Siskind’s Emergency Motion For Protective Order Prohibiting 

The Release Of Confidential Client Financial Information [ECF No. 121] [ECF No. 

180] Bankruptcy Court For The Southern District Of Florida – Case No. 18-16248 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 478-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
NO. 15-14-01411-CR

ANTHONY PHIFER § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

V. § FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § DALLAS, TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

 COMES NOW the Appellant in the above-styled and numbered cause and 

respectfully moves the Court to extend time for filing the Appellant’s brief in this cause 

and in support thereof would show to the Court the following: 

1. This case is pending from the 292nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, 

Texas. The style and number of the case in the trial court is: The State of Texas 

v. Anthony Phifer, Cause No. F14-75027. The Appellant was convicted of the 

misdemeanor offense of Attempted Unlawful Restraint of A Child Under 17 and 

was assessed a 300 day county jail sentence.

2. Judgment and sentence were entered on October 22, 2014. 

3. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s brief in this case was April 29, 2015. The 

case has not been set for submission.

4. An extension of time for a period of forty two (42) days is requested that would 

make the due date June 10, 2015. 

5. One extension of time has been requested for the filing of Appellant’s brief. 

Appellant’s one extension of time to file his brief was granted. 

ACCEPTED

05-14-01411-CR

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

6/22/2015 12:45:41 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 6/22/2015 12:45:41 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
6. Reason for Appellant’s request for this extension of time to file his brief is as 

follows:

Counsel for Appellant was preparing and conducting trial in the following cases:

The State of Texas v. Paris Michael, Cause Nos. F14-70721, F14-70722, F14-

70663, In the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Counsel for Appellant had the following federal cases which possessed numerous 

voluminous files of discovery which had to be reviewed and explained to each 

client. In addition, the clients met with federal agents for a de-briefing:

USA v. James Singleton 4:13CR248

USA v. Benny Doe 4:14CR136

USA v. Jeron Gibson 4:14CR46

In addition, Counsel for Appellant moved offices, which required his exclusive 

coordination in coordinating the move.

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant respectfully 

requests that this Honorable Court extend the time for filing the Appellant’s brief 

in this cause until June 10, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,
___/s/ Danny Oliphant___________

J. DANIEL OLIPHANT

3021 Ridge Road, Ste A #275

Rockwall, Texas 75126

(469)879-8531 Telephone

(972)552-9374 Fax

jdoliphantjr@gmail.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was served 

upon the attorney of record on June 23, 2015.

___/s/ Danny Oliphant______________

DANNY OLIPHANT
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report
of SaviCorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Serge Monros, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to SaviCorp. and will be retained by SaviCorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: December 3, 2013 | By: /s/ SERGE MONROS   
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|                       | Serge Monros           
|                       | Chief Executive Officer