alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 334 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of 

a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2011 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving the 

American Falls Reservoir. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN5 VOLVING AMERICAN FALLS RESERVOIR. 

6 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

7 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

8 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com9 mission project numbered 12423, the Federal Energy 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 334 IS

1 Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the li2 censee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in 

3 accordance with the procedures of the Commission under 

4 that section, reinstate the license and extend the time pe5 riod during which the licensee is required to commence 

6 the construction of project works to September 25, 2013. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Steve M. Hanni, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: February 5, 2004

/s/Steve M. Hanni
Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Thornton J. Donaldson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of CanWest  Petroleum
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

      (a)   designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant  is made known to us by others,  particularly  during the
            period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b)   intentionally omitted per SEC rel. 33-8238;

      (c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (d)   disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors;

      (e)   all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (f)   any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

December 20, 2004

/s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
--------------------------------
Thornton J. Donaldson
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-11 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 6
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-11 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 6
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-11 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 6
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-11 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 6
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-11 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 6
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-11 Filed 10/22/20 Page 6 of 6
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

Louis Tino Fisher,

Debtor.

/

Case No.: 19-19710-SMG

Chapter 7

ORDER DENYING MOTION AS MOOT

THIS MATTER came before the Court without a hearing on pro se Debtor’s

Motion to Dismiss Case (the “Motion”) (ECF No. 48). Noting that the case is already 

dismissed, it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

###

Copies Furnished To:

Louis Tino Fisher 

5440 NW 12th Court 

Lauderhill, FL 33313

Kenneth Welt, Trustee

AUST

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 10, 2020.

Scott M. Grossman, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

Case 19-19710-SMG Doc 53 Filed 01/10/20 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2520
LYDIA PERALTA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-3298-HAR) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lydia Peralta, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph Gutman, Vincent Michael Wills, BLUM, YUMKAS, MAILMAN, GUTMAN & DENICK, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in the Appellee's favor on her claims of national origin discrimination and retaliatory discharge in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1981 & Supp. 1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peralta v. Levindale Hebrew Geriatric Center and Hospital , No. CA-94-3298-HAR (D. Md. Aug. 1, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for sanctions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequa tely presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Appellant claimed that he had good cause if he "pass fed] the

deadline by a couple of days" because he was in administrative segregation, did not have physical access to the law library, and had to rely on law clerks to come to his unit. Appellant failed to demonstrate cause for the delay. Appellant failed to state how long he was in administrative segregation or to demonstrate that the prison failed to provide him adequate means of accessing legal research materials or the mail. Moreover, appellant could not have demonstrated undue prejudice because his claims were not supported by specific factual allegations that, even if true and not repelled by the record, would have entitled him to relief See Hargrove IT. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

2 The district court improperly reached the merits of appellant's claims. See State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Riker), 121 Nev. 225, 231, 112 P.3d 1070, 1074 (2005) ("Application of the statutory procedural default rules to post-conviction habeas petitions is mandatory."). We nevertheless affirm the district court's decision for the reasons stated above. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (holding that a correct result will not be reversed simply because it is based on the wrong reason).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947Acc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge Roger Raphael Brown Attorney GenerallCarson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3

(0) 1947A
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on February 25, 2009, Rhodes 
Technologies, 498 Washington Street, Coventry, Rhode Island 02816, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Dihydrocodeine (9120)......................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Oripavine (9330)...........................  II
Thebaine (9333)............................  II
Oxymorphone (9652).........................  II
Noroxymorphone (9668)......................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for conversion and sale to dosage form manufacturers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than June 29, 2009.

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9806 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3053 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3053

  To require Regional Administrators of the Environmental Protection 
   Agency to be appointed by and with the advice and consent of the 
                                Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2012

   Mr. Inhofe (for himself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Risch, Mr. DeMint, Mr. 
Wicker, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
 Moran, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Toomey, 
Mr. McConnell, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
 Graham, and Mr. Vitter) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require Regional Administrators of the Environmental Protection 
   Agency to be appointed by and with the advice and consent of the 
                                Senate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``EPA Regional Oversight Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
including Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970 (5 U.S.C. App. 1), each 
Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall be 
appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate.
    (b) Incumbents.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), the individuals 
serving as Regional Administrators of the Environmental Protection 
Agency on the date of enactment of this Act may continue to serve as 
Regional Administrators until January 1, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Ion-adsorption REEs in regolith of the Liberty Hill pluton, South Carolina, USA: An effect of hydrothermal alteration      

      October 11, 2016    

Ion-adsorbed rare earth element (REE) deposits supply the majority of world heavy REE production and substantial light REE production, but relatively little is known of their occurrence outside Southeast Asia. We examined the distribution and forms of REEs on a North American pluton located in the highly weathered and slowly eroding South Carolina Piedmont. The Hercynian Liberty Hill pluton experiences a modern climate that includes ~ 1500 mm annual rainfall and a mean annual temperature of 17 °C. The pluton is medium- to coarse-grained biotite-amphibole granite with minor biotite granite facies. REE-bearing phases are diverse and include monazite, zircon, titanite, allanite, apatite and bastnäsite. Weathered profiles were sampled up to 7 m-deep across the ~ 400 km2 pluton. In one profile, ion-adsorbed REEs plus yttrium (REE + Y) ranged up to 581 mg/kg and accounted for up to 77% of total REE + Y in saprolite. In other profiles, ion-adsorbed REE + Y ranged 12–194 mg/kg and only accounted for 3–37% of totals. The profile most enriched in ion-adsorbed REEs was located along the mapped boundary of two granite facies and contained trioctahedral smectite in the saprolite, evidence suggestive of hydrothermal alteration of biotite at that location. Post-emplacement deuteric alteration can generate easily weathered REE phases, particularly fluorocarbonates. In the case of Liberty Hill, hydrothermal alteration may have converted less soluble to more soluble REE minerals. Additionally, regolith P content was inversely correlated with the fraction ion-adsorbed REEs, and weathering related secondary REE-phosphates were found in some regolith profiles. Both patterns illustrate how low P content aids in the accumulation of ion-adsorbed REEs. The localized occurrence at Liberty Hill sheds light on conditions and processes that generate ion-adsorbed REEs.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Nora Foley

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

nfoley@usgs.gov

703-648-6179

## Related Content

#### Nora Foley

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

nfoley@usgs.gov

703-648-6179

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Colorado Water Science Center - Main Office          

West 6th Avenue and Kipling StreetDenver Federal Center, Building 53, MS-415Lakewood, CO80225United States

(303) 236-6900

(303) 236-4912

####               Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Mail Stop 954Reston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Liberty Hill Pluton
                  - South Carolina

View All **
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 
 Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated 
 Directors’ Compensation Summary
Sheet 
  

					
	 	 	NON-EMPLOYEE BOARD MEMBERS	 	 OUTSIDE BOARD
 CHAIRMAN

	 	 	Board Members - $50,000	 	 
	 	 	 Committee Chairpersons
-
 $58,000
	 	 
	 ANNUAL RETAINER
	 	 Audit Committee Chair
-
 $62,000
	 	$83,000
	 	 	
Special Committee Chair - $12,000 (plus $1,000/month

for as long as committee is
 in place)
	 	 
	 BOARD MEETING FEE
	 	$3,000 - In Person	 	$4,000 - In Person
	 	$1,500 - By Telephone	 	$2,000 - By Telephone
	 COMMITTEE MEMBER
 MEETING
FEE
	 	$3,000 - In Person	 	$3,000 - In Person
	 	$1,500 - By Telephone	 	$1,500 - By Telephone
	 COMMITTEE CHAIR
 MEETING
FEES
	 	$3,000 - In Person	 	--
	 	$1,500 - By Telephone	 	--
	 STOCK
GRANT
	 	1,725 shares	 	2,125 shares
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

XILINX, INC., XILINX ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD.,

Appellants

v.

ANALOG DEVICES, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2022-1774

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-

01559.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of appellants’ unopposed motion 

to voluntarily dismiss this appeal pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Case: 22-1774 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 11/30/2022
2 XILINX, INC. v. ANALOG DEVICES, INC.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

 November 30, 2022 

 Date

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 30, 2022

Case: 22-1774 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 11/30/2022
# L_2004249EN.01000301.xml

| 23.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 249/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 249/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1338/2004

of 22 July 2004

amending Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the grant of aid for skimmed milk and skimmed-milk powder intended for animal feed and the sale of such skimmed-milk powder

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 26 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 (2), intervention agencies have organised a standing invitation to tender for skimmed-milk powder taken into storage before 1 July 2002. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 26 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999 (2), intervention agencies have organised a standing invitation to tender for skimmed-milk powder taken into storage before 1 July 2002.

| (2) | In view of the quantity still available and the market situation, that date should be amended to 1 October 2002. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the quantity still available and the market situation, that date should be amended to 1 October 2002.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 26(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2799/1999, the date of ‘1 July 2002’ is replaced by the date ‘1 October 2002’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 340, 31.12.1999, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1079/2004 (OJ L 203, 8.6.2004, p. 13).

2

---