alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19998-19999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9935]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-62,067]


Crosible, Inc., U.S. Division, Including Workers Whose Wages Are 
Reported Under the Federal Employer Identification Number for Madison 
Filter Inc., Now Known as Clear Edge Filtration, Moravia, NY; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance on September 12, 2007, applicable to 
workers and former workers of Crosible, Inc., U.S. Division, Moravia, 
New York. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 
27, 2007 (72 FR 54939). The certification was amended on February 9, 
2009 to reflect the new name of the subject firm, Clear Edge 
Filtration. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
February 23, 2009 (74 FR 8110-8111).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Workers produce filters, 
made of fabric, used for air and water filtration systems.
    New information provided shows that some of the workers at the 
subject firm have their Unemployment Insurance wages reported under the 
tax account for Madison Filter Inc.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Crosible, Inc., who were adversely affected by a shift of 
filter production to Mexico. Consequently, the Department is again 
amending the certification to properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-62,067 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Crosible, Inc., U.S. Division, including 
workers whose wages are reported under the Federal Employer 
Identification Number for Madison Filter Inc., now known as Clear 
Edge Filtration, Moravia, New York, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after August 27, 2006, through 
September 12, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to 
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 
of the Trade Act of 1974.''


[[Page 19999]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of April 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-9935 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 37001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15146]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 77, No. 115, 
Thursday June 14, 2012, page 35660.

ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF OPEN MEETING: 10 a.m.-12 p.m., Wednesday 
June 20, 2012.

CHANGES TO OPEN MEETING: Time Change to 9 a.m.-12 p.m., June 20, 2012.

Matters to be Considered: Hearing: Agenda and Priorities for Fiscal 
Year 2014.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: June 15, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-15146 Filed 6-18-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**SAVICORP.****OFFICER’SCERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

 

I, Serge Monros,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SaviCorp.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) [Omittedpursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

 

(c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer'sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: October 24, 2013

 

/s/ SERGE MONROS

Serge Monros

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson                
|                   |  |  |  | Rodger L. Johnson                    
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-15 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-15 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
Chad BERKOWITZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK TRUST, NA, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0901

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2008, the undersigned Karim Hirji, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best            of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December 8, 2008 | /s/ Karim Hirji                      |
|------------------|--------------------------------------|
|             | Karim Hirji, Chief Financial Officer |
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700290

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JOSHUA B. HAYGOOD

Hospital Corpsman Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Robert J. Crow, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Southeast, Naval Air 

Station, Jacksonville FL.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander G.W. Lucier, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Major David A. Peters, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 26 February 2018

_________________________

Before MARKS, JONES, and WOODARD, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
William MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Mortality in captive sandhill cranes at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 1966-1975      

      January 1, 1976    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Eastern Ecological Science Center at the Leetown Research Laboratory          

11649 Leetown RoadKearneysville, WV25430United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
                  - Maryland

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mars exploration rover geologic traverse by the spirit rover in the plains of Gusev crater, Mars      

      January 1, 2005    

The Spirit rover completed a 2.5 km traverse across gently sloping plains on the floor of Gusev crater from its location on the outer rim of Bonneville crater to the lower slopes of the Columbia Hills, Mars. Using the Athena suite of instruments in a transect approach, a systematic series of overlapping panoramic mosaics, remote sensing observations, surface analyses, and trenching operations documented the lateral variations in landforms, geologic materials, and chemistry of the surface throughout the traverse, demonstrating the ability to apply the techniques of field geology by remote rover operations. Textures and shapes of rocks within the plains are consistent with derivation from impact excavation and mixing of the upper few meters of basaltic lavas. The contact between surrounding plains and crater ejecta is generally abrupt and marked by increases in clast abundance and decimeter-scale steps in relief. Basaltic materials of the plains overlie less indurated and more altered rock types at a time-stratigraphic contact between the plains and Columbia Hills that occurs over a distance of one to two meters. This implies that regional geologic contacts are well preserved and that Earth-like field geologic mapping will be possible on Mars despite eons of overturn by small impacts.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

## Related Content

####             Kenneth Edward Herkenhoff, Ph.D. (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Astrogeology Science Center

### Contact

####               Astrogeology Science Center          

2255 N. Gemini DriveFlagstaff, AZ86001United States

928-556-7000

928-556-7014

### Explore Search

                  - Gusev Crater; Mars
                  - Gusev Crater
                  -  Mars

View All **
NUMBER 13-22-00276-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN SPENCER, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

O R D E R

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Christopher Allen Spencer, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court 

from his conviction in trial court cause number A-14-5061-CR. The trial court’s 

certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have 

the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a 

defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. 
2

R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort 

appealable cases from non-appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move 

through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and 

expense associated with non-appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the 

Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer 

v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Within thirty days of date of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Hon. 

Irma M. Sanjines, is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant 

has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within 

thirty days of this notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant 

has a right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 

614–15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (certification form provided in appendix to 

appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under 

circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the 

applicable case law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by 

the record. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614–15; cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 

316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that 

recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of 

record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting 
3

appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1,

10.2.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 

27th day of July, 2022.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Mode of occurrence and environmental mobility of oil-field radioactive material at US Geological Survey research site B, Osage-Skiatook Project, northeastern Oklahoma      

      January 1, 2007    

Two samples of produced-water collected from a storage tank at US Geological Survey research site B, near Skiatook Lake in northeastern Oklahoma, have activity concentrations of dissolved 226Ra and 228Ra that are about 1500 disintegrations/min/L (dpm/L). Produced-water also contains minor amounts of small (5–50 μm) suspended grains of Ra-bearing BaSO4 (barite). Precipitation of radioactive barite scale in the storage tank is probably hindered by low concentrations of dissolved SO4 (2.5 mg/L) in the produced-water. Sediments in a storage pit used to temporarily collect releases of produced-water have marginally elevated concentrations of “excess” Ra (several dpm/g), that are 15–65% above natural background values. Tank and pit waters are chemically oversaturated with barite, and some small (2–20 μm) barite grains observed in the pit sediments could be transferred from the tank or formed in place. Measurements of the concentrations of Ba and excess Ra isotopes in the pit sediments show variations with depth that are consistent with relatively uniform deposition and progressive burial of an insoluble Ra-bearing host (barite?). The short-lived 228Ra isotope (half-life = 5.76 a) shows greater reductions with depth than 226Ra (half-life = 1600 a), that are likely explained by radioactive decay. The 228Ra/226Ra activity ratio of excess Ra in uppermost pit sediments (1.13–1.17) is close to the ratio measured in the samples of produced-water (0.97, 1.14). Declines in Ra activity ratio (excess) with sediment depth can be used to estimate an average rate of burial of 4 cm/a for the Ra-bearing contaminant. Local shallow ground waters contaminated with NaCl from produced-water have low dissolved Ra (<20 dpm/L) and also are oversaturated with barite. Barite is a highly insoluble Ra host that probably limits the environmental mobility of Ra at site B.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Robert Zielinski

##### Scientist Emeritus

Central Energy Resources Science Center

rzielinski@usgs.gov

303-236-4719

#### Jim Budahn

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

jbudahn@usgs.gov

303-236-7919

## Related Content

#### Robert Zielinski

##### Scientist Emeritus

Central Energy Resources Science Center

rzielinski@usgs.gov

303-236-4719

#### Jim Budahn

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

jbudahn@usgs.gov

303-236-7919

### Contact

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Skiatook Lake
                  - Oklahoma

View All **
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELBERTH ANTONIO DAPOLA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71093

Agency No. A072-133-390

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2012 ** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Kelberth Antonio Dapola, native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an

FILED

MAY 17 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
immigration judge's denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency's discretionary determination that

Dapola failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United

States citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez–Castro v. Mukasey, 552

F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir. 2009).

The contention that the Board failed to properly consider and weigh all

evidence of hardship does not raise a colorable due process claim. Martinez–Rosas

v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlantic BancGroup, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David L. Young,
Principal Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
            results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
            covered by the Report.


Date: March 17, 2005                   By: /s/ David L. Young
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David L. Young, Principal Financial
                                           Officer and Chief Financial Officer
C.M.D., Appellant, v. K.R.B., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2200

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017

Elizabeth S. Wheeler of Berg & Wheeler, P.A., Brandon, for Appellant.

Andrea Black of Andrea Black, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-8 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 474-8 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2