Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Notices 19525 

1The three administrative reviews forming the 

basis of the revocation are: 1) the May 3, 2001, 

through October 31, 2002, review, Certain HotRolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From Thailand: 

Final Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 69 FR 

19388 (April 13, 2004); 2) the November 1, 2002, 

through October 31, 2003, review, Certain HotRolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Thailand: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 69 FR 18349 (April 7, 2004); and 3) the 

November 1, 2003, through October 31, 2004, 

review, Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from Thailand: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial 

Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 71 FR 28659 (May 17, 2006) (‘‘Revocation’’) 

2On December 10, 2008, we issued a notice 

correcting an error in the Extension Notice. See 

Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from 

Thailand: Correction to Notice of Extension of Time 

Limit for Final Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review, 73 FR 75079 (December 10, 2008). 

3On February 5, 2009, the Department issued a 

notice correcting an error in the Preliminary 

Results. See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from Thailand: Correction to Preliminary 

Results of Changed Circumstances Review and 

Intent To Reinstate Sahaviriya Steel Industries 

Public Company Limited in the Antidumping Duty 

Order, 74 FR 6136 (February 5, 2009). 

requested revocation of the Hot–Rolled 

Steel Order with respect to its sales of 

subject merchandise. See Certain Hot– 

Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From 

Thailand; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent to Revoke and 

Rescind in Part, 70 FR 73197 (December 

9, 2005). 

In its revocation request, SSI agreed to 

immediate reinstatement in the Hot– 

Rolled Steel Order, so long as any 

producer or reseller is subject to the 

order, should the Department determine 

that SSI ‘‘sold the subject merchandise 

at less than normal value.’’ See SSI’s 

November 30, 2004, letter to the 

Department requesting revocation. On 

May 17, 2006, the Department revoked 

the antidumping duty order with 

respect to SSI after having determined 

that SSI sold the merchandise at not less 

than normal value for a period of at least 

three consecutive years.1 See 

Revocation. 

As the result of an adequate allegation 

from a domestic interested party in this 

proceeding (i.e., United States Steel 

Corporation), the Department, pursuant 

to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), is now 

conducting a changed circumstances 

review to determine whether SSI has 

resumed dumping hot–rolled steel and 

whether the antidumping order should 

be reinstated for hot–rolled steel from 

Thailand manufactured and exported by 

SSI. See Initiation of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review: Certain 

Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products 

from Thailand, 73 FR 18766 (April 7, 

2008). 

‘‘On October 29, 2008, based upon the 

complexity of the issues presented in 

this review, we extended the time limit 

for completion of this changed 

circumstances review until April 22, 

2009. See Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from Thailand: 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review, 73 FR 64303 (October 29, 2008) 

(‘‘Extension Notice’’).2

On December 30, 2008, the 

Department published the preliminary 

results of the changed circumstances 

review and intent to reinstate SSI in the 

antidumping duty order on hot–rolled 

steel from Thailand. See Certain Hot– 

Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from 

Thailand: Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review and 

Intent To Reinstate Sahaviriya Steel 

Industries Public Company Limited in 

the Antidumping Duty Order, 73 FR 

79809 (December 30, 2008) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).3

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results 

As the Department stated in both the 

Extension Notice and the Preliminary 

Results, the Department intended to 

issue the final results of this 

antidumping duty changed 

circumstances review on hot–rolled 

steel from Thailand by April 22, 2009. 

However, it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period. In order to evaluate fairly the 

issues raised by all interested parties in 

their respective case and rebuttal briefs, 

we are extending the time frame for 

completion of this review. As a result, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.302(b), we are 

extending the time limit for completion 

of the review by 15 days. See Certain 

Pasta from Italy: Notice of Extension of 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review, 73 FR 

46871 (August 12, 2008), and 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film Sheet 

and Strip from the Republic of Korea: 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review, 73 FR 6931 (February 6, 2008). 

Therefore, the final results are now due 

no later than May 7, 2009. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b) and 

771(i) of the Act. 

Dated: April 22, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–9815 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

William S. Middleton VA Hospital, et 

al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on 

Applications for Duty–Free Entry of 

Electron Microscopes 

This is a decision consolidated pursuant 

to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 

Scientific, and Cultural Materials 

Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89– 

651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–36; 80 

Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related 

records can be viewed between 8:30 

A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 3705, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington, 

D.C. 

Docket Number: 09–004. Applicant: 

William S. Middleton Veterans 

Administration Hospital, Madison, WI 

53706. Instrument: Electron Microscope, 

Model H–760–III. Manufacturer: Hitachi 

High Technologies Corporation, Japan. 

Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 

11527, March 18, 2009. 

Docket Number: 09–006. Applicant: 

Bergen County Technical Schools/ 

Bergen County Academies, Hackensack, 

NJ 07601. Instrument: Transmission 

Electron Microscope, Model JEM–2100. 

Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. 

Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 

11527, March 18, 2009. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. No instrument of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instrument, for such purposes as these 

instruments are intended to be used, 

was being manufactured in the United 

States at the time the instruments were 

ordered. Reasons: Each foreign 

instrument is an electron microscope 

and is intended for research or scientific 

educational uses requiring an electron 

microscope. We know of no electron 

microscope, or any other instrument 

suited to these purposes, which was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order of each instrument. 

Dated: April 23, 2009. 

Christopher Cassel, 

Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement 

Office, Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–9810 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES