alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 25, 2011

On July 20th, 2011 we held a conference call with Odyne Systems, LLC to discuss 

concerns raised by hybrid manufacturers regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) 

requirements and timing. Hybrid manufacturers, engine manufacturers, and industry trade groups

raised concerns during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed 

rulemaking that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy-duty

OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.

1,2

 Attendees from the 

EPA and Odyne are shown in the table below. 

Attendee Affiliation 

Cleophas Jackson EPA

Anthony Neam EPA

Amy Kopin EPA

Joe Dalum Odyne

Dr. Phillip Eidler Odyne

Bill Mammen Odyne

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, June 18, 2009, Friday, June 19, 2009 and Saturday, June 20, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee will be held Thursday June 18, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., Friday, June 19, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturday, June 20, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Mountain Time in Denver, CO. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: April 22, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-9890 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Michael Mahore STEWART, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1467

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Investigating atmospheric mercury with the U.S. Geological Survey Mobile Mercury Laboratory      

      November 6, 2007    

View Document

Atmospheric mercury is thought to be an important source of mercury present in fish, resulting in numerous local, statewide, tribal, and province-wide fish consumption advisories in the United States and Canada (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007a). To understand how mercury occurs in the atmosphere and its potential to be transferred from the atmosphere to the biosphere, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has been investigating sources and forms of atmospheric mercury, especially in locations where the amount of mercury deposited from precipitation is above average.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             Allan Kolker (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

## Related Content

####             Allan Kolker (Former Employee)          

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center

### Contact

####               Geology, Energy & Minerals Science Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Mail Stop 954Reston, VA20192United States

####               Ecosystems Mission Area Headquarters          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00186-CV

KENNETH W. SCROGGINS AND 

DALLAS LITE & BARRICADE, INC.,

Appellants

V.

BUYERS BARRICADES, INC., Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 141st District Court

of Tarrant County (141-332979-22)

October 13, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in part of the trial court’s Order. It is ordered that the trial court’s Order is 

affirmed in part and reversed in part. We have concluded that the trial court’s Order 

is impermissibly vague or unspecified as to issues one and two and reverse these 

portions of the Order, and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings 

consistent with this opinion. We affirm trial court’s Order in all other respects.

It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue. 
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 11715]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declaration for the State of Montana, dated 04/22/2009.

*Incident:*                         Miles City Fire.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/23/2009.                    

*Effective Date:*                         04/22/2009.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/22/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations.

The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties:*                     Custer.                

*Contiguous Counties:*

Montana, Carter, Fallon, Garfield, Powder River, Prairie, Rosebud.

*The Interest Rate is:*                     4.000.                

                    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 117150.                          ( print page 19606)    

The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Montana.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

Dated: April 22, 2009.

Karen G. Mills,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. E9-9752 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, based on his knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (this Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                        
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson                                  
|                       |  | Rodger L. Johnson President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

IN RE: CASE NO. 18-16248-MAM

CHANCE & ANTHEM, LLC, CHAPTER 7

Debtor.

_____________________________________/

ROBERT FURR, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Plaintiff,

v. ADV. NO. 19-01298-MAM

ROBERT GIBSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

JEFFREY SISKIND’S EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO

RESPOND TO INTERROGATORIES FILED AT ECF NO. 439

(ECF No. 440)

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 26, 2020.

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 444 Filed 08/27/20 Page 1 of 2
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on August 26, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. upon Defendant 

Jeffrey M. Siskind’s Ex Parte Motion to Shorten Time to Respond to Interrogatories Filed at 

ECF No. 439 (the “Motion”). The Court, having reviewed the Motion and response thereto, 

heard argument of the parties and being otherwise fully informed upon the premises, does 

hereby, be it

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED 

IN PART. Plaintiff shall furnish responses to said interrogatories on or before 10:30 a.m. on 

Monday, August 31, 2020.

###

Prepared by Jeffrey M. Siskind, 3465 Santa Barbara Drive, Wellington, FL 33414. Mr. Siskind 

shall serve same and file a Certificate of Service attesting to same.

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 444 Filed 08/27/20 Page 2 of 2
Amendment to Morgan Stanley 401(k) Plan, dated as of December 23, 2011



 EXHIBIT 10.7 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 401(k) PLAN 

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (the “Company”) hereby amends the Morgan Stanley 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”) as
follows: 
 1. Effective January 1, 2012, Section 20(a) of the Plan, Inalienability of Rights, shall be, and hereby
is, amended by adding the following at the end thereof: 
 “Effective January 1, 2012, in the event a domestic
relations order is submitted for determination of its status as a QDRO in accordance with this Section 20(a), a ‘QDRO determination fee’ of $750 shall be assessed and allocated among the Participant’s and the alternate
payee’s interests under the Plan as follows: 
 “(1) As provided in such QDRO, or, if not specified; 

“(2) If 100% of the Participant’s Account is assigned to the alternate payee, against the interest assigned to the alternate
payee; or 
 “(3) If any portion less than 100% of the Participant’s Account is assigned to the alternate payee,
evenly between the Participant and the alternate payee.” 
 2. Effective at the end of December 31, 2011, Supplement
B, Participants Residing in Puerto Rico, shall be, and hereby is, amended by adding the following to the end of Section 7, Amendment and Termination of This Supplement, thereof: 

“(c) Cessation of Participation of Puerto Rico Employees. Notwithstanding anything in this Supplement B to the contrary,
effective at the end of December 31, 2011, no Puerto Rico Participant shall be entitled or permitted to make or receive any Pre-Tax Contributions, After-Tax Contributions, Catch-Up Contributions, Company Contributions or other contributions or
allocations with respect to any Plan Year that commences on or after January 1, 2012. Any amounts held in the Plan attributable to periods prior to January 1, 2012 shall continue to be administered subject to the provisions of the
Plan.” 
 * * * * * * * * * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be
executed on its behalf as of this 23rd day of December,
2011. 
  

			
	MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ JEFF BRODSKY
	Title:	 	Global Head of Human Resources



  
 2
Alan Boyd CURTIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4546

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Modeling highly transient flow, mass, and heat transport in the Chattahoochee River near Atlanta, Georgia      

      January 1, 1979    

View Document

A coupled flow-temperature model has been developed and verified for a 27.9-km reach of the Chattahoochee River between Buford Dam and Norcross, Ga. Flow in this reach of the Chattahoochee is continuous but highly regulated by Buford Dam, a flood-control and hydroelectric facility located near Buford, Ga. Calibration and verification utilized two sets of data collected under highly unsteady discharge conditions. Existing solution techniques, with certain minor improvements, were applied to verify the existing technology of flow and transport modeling. 

The linear, implicit finite-difference flow model was calibrated by use of a depth profile obtained at steady low flow and unsteady flow data obtained in March 1976. During the calibration period, the model was generally able to reproduce observed stages to within 0.15 m and discharges at less than 100 m 3 /s, to within 5 percent. Peak discharges of about 200 m 3 /s were under-estimated by about 20 percent. During the verification period, October 1975, the flow model reproduced observed stage changes to within about 0.15 m, and its timing and over-all performance was considered to be very good. 

Dye was added to the upstream end of the river reach at a constant rate while the river flow was highly unsteady. The numerical solution of either the conservative or nonconservative form of the mass-transport equation did an excellent job of simulating the observed concentrations of dye in the river. 

The temperature model was capable of predicting temperature changes through this reach of as large as 5.8?C with a RMS (root-mean-square) error of 0.32?C in October 1975 and 0.20?C in March 1976. 

Hydropulsation has a significant effect on the water temperature below Buford Dam. These effects are very complicated because they are quite dependent on the timing of the release with respect to both the time of day and past releases.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Chattahoochee River
                  - Georgia

View All **
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Interdisciplinary discussion of volcanic processes beneath the Long Valley Caldera-Mono Craters Area      

      June 1, 2004    

Volcanism in the Long Valley Caldera-Mono Craters (LVCMC) volcanic field in eastern California over the past 4 Ma is dominated by the 0.76 Ma caldera-forming eruption of 600 km3 of rhyolite to form the Bishop Tuff. Over the last 150 k.y., volcanism has concentrated along the Mono-Inyo chain, which extends 45 km north from Mammoth Mountain to Mono Lake (Figure 1, below). Recent eruptions along this chain have occurred from multiple vents 650±50 yr B.P. and from a vent in the middle of Mono Lake ∼300 yr B.P. An earthquake swarm in May 1980, including four M6 earthquakes accompanied by uplift of the resurgent dome in the center of the caldera, called attention to the restless nature of Long Valley caldera. Subsequent activity has included recurring swarms of earthquakes (M≤5.8), episodic uplift of the resurgent dome, diffuse outgassing of magmatic CO2, and mid-crustal (10- to 25- km deep), long period (LP) volcanic earthquakes.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

####             David Hill (Former Employee)          

##### Former Scientist-In-Charge

California Volcano Observatory

## Related Content

####             David Hill (Former Employee)          

##### Former Scientist-In-Charge

California Volcano Observatory

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - long valley
                  -  Mono Craters
                  - california

View All **
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of RG America, Inc. (the
"Registrant") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Bruce
A. Hall, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify to my knowledge and
in my capacity as an officer of the Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
that:

     (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
         report.

Date:    April 17, 2006                           /s/ Bruce A. Hall
         --------------                           ------------------------------
                                                  Bruce A. Hall
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Investigating permafrost carbon dynamics in Alaska with artificial intelligence      

      November 16, 2023    

Positive feedbacks between permafrost degradation and the release of soil carbon into the atmosphere impact land–atmosphere interactions, disrupt the global carbon cycle, and accelerate climate change. The widespread distribution of thawing permafrost is causing a cascade of geophysical and biochemical disturbances with global impacts. Currently, few earth system models account for permafrost carbon feedback (PCF) mechanisms. This research study integrates artificial intelligence (AI) tools and information derived from field-scale surveys across the tundra and boreal landscapes in Alaska. We identify and interpret the permafrost carbon cycling links and feedback sensitivities with GeoCryoAI, a hybridized multimodal deep learning (DL) architecture of stacked convolutionally layered, memory-encoded recurrent neural networks (NN). This framework integrates in-situ measurements and flux tower observations for teacher forcing and model training. Preliminary experiments to quantify, validate, and forecast permafrost degradation and carbon efflux across Alaska demonstrate the fidelity of this data-driven architecture. More specifically, GeoCryoAI logs the ecological memory and effectively learns covariate dynamics while demonstrating an aptitude to simulate and forecast PCF dynamics—active layer thickness (ALT), carbon dioxide flux (CO2), and methane flux (CH4)—with high precision and minimal loss (i.e. ALTRMSE: 1.327 cm [1969–2022]; CO2RMSE: 0.697 μmolCO2m−2s−1 [2003–2021]; CH4RMSE: 0.715 nmolCH4m−2s−1 [2011–2022]). ALT variability is a sensitive harbinger of change, a unique signal characterizing the PCF, and our model is the first characterization of these dynamics across space and time.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center          

47914 252nd StreetSioux Falls, SD57198United States

custserv@usgs.gov

800-252-4547

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
EXHIBIT  10.12

 

Summary of Benjamin A. Pardo 2012 Compensation

 

The Knoll, Inc. compensation committee approved an annual base salary of $265,000 for Benjamin A. Pardo, with a bonus target of $250,000.  Mr. Pardo is also entitled to participate in the benefit plans provided by Knoll that are generally available to Knoll employees.