alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

EXHIBIT 13.1

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to   Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to   Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer  of Linux Gold Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| 1.     | The Amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Linux        Gold Corp. for the year ended February 29, 2004 (the "Report")        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations        of Linux Gold Corp.                                                                                                                  |

Richmond, BC, Canada

by: /s/ John G. Robertson

April 14, 2005

John G. Robertson  President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section  906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon  request.

----
**Exhibit 13.1**
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of AbbeyNational plc (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andinformation contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: 8 June 2005                                                      /s/  FranciscoGómez-Roldán    FranciscoGómez-Roldán   Chief Executive Officer      Dated: 8 June 2005                                                      /s/  NathanBostock    Nathan Bostock    Director, Finance and Markets
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centra Software, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Leon Navickas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Leon Navickas                    
|                     |  | Leon Navickas Chief Executive
Officer
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.      SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,                2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the“Periodic                Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the                end of                the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations                of the                Company for the period covered by the Periodic                Report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                          |   |   |                                                |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| /s/              Peter A.              Michel |   |   | /s/              David G. Vana                      |
| Peter A. Michel Chief Executive Officer       |   |   | David G. VanaChief Financial                Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,076
<INVENTORY>                                     36,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,138
<PP&E>                                          43,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 264,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,447
<BONDS>                                        169,591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   264,641
<SALES>                                         39,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,051
<CGS>                                           26,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,237)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE:

CURT DOUGLAS FRANCIS,

 

 Debtor.

________________________________/

 CASE NO. 19-18079-BKC-LMI

 Chapter 7 

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED SCHEDULES

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on January 27, 2021 at the hearing on the Motion 

for Summary Judgment (ECF #28) (the “Hearing”) in the related adversary proceeding (Adv. 

Case No. 20-1218-LMI). For the reasons stated on the record at the Hearing, the Court deems it 

appropriate to set a deadline by which the Debtor shall file amended schedules. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. The Debtor shall file amended schedules on or before March 1, 2021.

###

Laurel M. Isicoff

Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

___________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 28, 2021.

Case 19-18079-LMI Doc 103 Filed 01/28/21 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to: 

Curt Douglas Francis, pro se Debtor 

The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order upon all interested parties who do not 

receive service by CM/ECF.

Case 19-18079-LMI Doc 103 Filed 01/28/21 Page 2 of 2
# L_2004249EN.01000801.xml

| 23.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 249/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 249/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1342/2004

of 22 July 2004

applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 of 13 July 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (2), and in particular Article 8(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches 443 844 247 EUR while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates for use from 1 August 2004 as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is 31 519 560 EUR. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches 443 844 247 EUR while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates for use from 1 August 2004 as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is 31 519 560 EUR.

| (2) | A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 August 2004 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 August 2004 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amounts for applications of refund certificates for use from 1 August 2004 are subject to a reduction coefficient of 0,929.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2004.

For the Commission

Olli REHN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 20.12.1993, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2580/2000 (OJ L 298, 25.11.2000, p. 5).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

2

---
Proposed PSD Permit 

Amendment for the MCU 

Facility
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WALTER E. RYAN, JR. and RYAN

ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC on

Behalf of Themselves and All Others

Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs Belo w,

Appellant s

,

v.

TRACY ACCARDI, JAMES R.

BERGMAN, JOSEPH R.

BRONSON, TUNC DOLUCA,

ROBERT E. GRADY, MERCEDES

JOHNSON, WILLIAM P.

SULLIVAN, WILLIAM D.

WATKINS, MARYANN WRIGHT,

and ANALOG DEVICES, INC.,

Defendants Below,

Appellee s

. §

§ No. 2 24 , 2023

§

§ Court Below

— Court of

§ Chancery of the State of

§ Delaware

§

§ C. A No. 2022

- 0255

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted: February 14 , 2024

Decided: February 2 6

, 202 4

Before TRAYNOR

, LEGROW

, and GRIFFITHS

, Justices.

ORDER

This 2 6 th day of February 202 4 , a fter careful consideration of the parties’

briefs and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons stated in its May 2, 2 023 order and transcript ruling granting appellees’2

motion to dismiss appellants’ complaint and its May 30, 2023 order denying

appellants ’ motion for reargument

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery is AFFIRMED

.

BY THE C OURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths

Justice
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel. SRSP Conflicts.
    Date: June 11, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 
DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Marina Broitman, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6153, 
MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608. 301-402-8152. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8b5baaab7b1acb5b998b5b9b1b4f6b6b1b0f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4a9a6b6abadb0a9a584a9a5ada8eaaaadaceaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 22, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-9860 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2004298EN.01001601.xml

| 23.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/16

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1659/2004

of 22 September 2004

determining the extent to which applications lodged in September 2004 for import licences for certain pigmeat sector products under the regime provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for pigmeat and certain other agricultural products can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1432/94 of 22 June 1994 laying down detailed rules for the application in the pigmeat sector of the import arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for pigmeat and certain other agricultural products (1), and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The applications for import licences lodged for the fourth quarter of 2004 are for quantities less than the quantities available and can therefore be met in full. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The applications for import licences lodged for the fourth quarter of 2004 are for quantities less than the quantities available and can therefore be met in full.

| (2) | It is appropriate to draw the attention of operators to the fact that licences may only be used for products which comply with all veterinary rules currently in force in the Community, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is appropriate to draw the attention of operators to the fact that licences may only be used for products which comply with all veterinary rules currently in force in the Community,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2004 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1432/94 shall be met as referred to in the Annex.

2.   Licences may only be used for products which comply with all veterinary rules currently in force in the Community.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 156, 23.6.1994, p. 14. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 332/2004 (OJ L 60, 27.2.2004, p. 10).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 October to 31 December 2004 |
| --- | --- |
| 1 | 100,00 |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 October to 31 December 2004

1

100,00

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2715

JERRYL A. MARTIN, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versusAIRBORNE EXPRESS; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED; AMR SERVICES CORPORATION; AMR DISTRIBUTION SYS; DAVID CHALK, individually and in his corporate officer capacity as General Manager of AMR Freight Distribution and Servicingwithin the Raleigh Division; RON HILL, individually and in his corporate officer capacity as Supervisor of AMR Freight Distribution and Servicing within the Raleigh Division; JOSEPHGNEISER, individually and in his corporate officer capacity as Manager of Airborne Freight Distribution and Servicing within the Raleigh Division, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1041-5-BR) Submitted: April 28, 1998 Decided: July 24, 1998 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Jerryl A. Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul K. Sun, Jr., SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Weyman Thompson Johnson, Jr., Anthony Craig Cleland, PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jerryl A. Martin appeals a district court order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying Martin’s motion for cross summary judgment in an action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1994), and claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress and breach of contract. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Airborne Express , No. CA-95- 1041-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc 2007 Equity Incentive Plan Sub-Plan Governing Awards



 EXHIBIT 10.3B 
 JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS PLC 

2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

SUB-PLAN GOVERNING AWARDS TO PARTICIPANTS
IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND 
  

	1	General 

  

	1.1	In accordance with Rule 2(b)(xi) of the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”) the Board has determined to establish this sub-plan (“the Irish
Sub-Plan”) for the purposes of Employees, Directors and Consultants who are resident in the Republic of Ireland. 

  

	1.2	All terms that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Plan. 


 

	2	Terms of Irish Sub-Plan 

 The Plan shall
be amended as follows. 
  

	2.1	Transferability of Awards 

  

	2.1.1	The provisions of Rule 5(d) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: 


 

	 	(d)	Transferability of Options. An Option shall not be transferable and shall not be capable of being assigned, transferred, sold, mortgaged, pledged or
encumbered in any way whatsoever by a Participant (other than upon the Participant’s death as provided by Section 5(i)). 

  

	2.2	Employment or Other Service Rights; Compensation 

 The provisions of Rule 8(d) shall be deleted and replaced by the following: 

(d)        No Employment or Other Service Rights. Nothing in the Plan, any Stock Award
Agreement or other instrument executed thereunder or in connection with any Stock Award granted pursuant to the Plan shall confer upon any Participant any right to continue to serve the Company or an Affiliate in the capacity in effect at the time
the Stock Award was granted or shall affect any right that the Company or an Affiliate may have to terminate (i) the employment of an Employee in accordance with applicable law, (ii) the service of a Consultant pursuant to the terms of
such Consultant’s agreement with the Company or an Affiliate, or (iii) the service of a Director pursuant to the Bylaws of the Company or an Affiliate, and any applicable provisions of the corporate law of the state in which the Company or
the Affiliate is incorporated, as the case may be. A Participant shall not be entitled to any compensation or damages whatsoever or howsoever described, by reason of any termination, withdrawal or alteration of rights or expectations under the Plan
whether such compensation is claimed by way of damages for wrongful dismissal or other breach of contract or by way of compensation for loss of office or otherwise howsoever.