alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Integrating seismic reflection and geological data and interpretations across an internal basement massif: The southern Appalachian Pine Mountain window, USA      

      January 1, 2005    

The southern Appalachian Pine Mountain window exposes 1.1 Ga Grenvillian basement and its metasedimentary Paleozoic(?) cover through the allochthonous Inner Piedmont. The issue of whether the crustal block inside the window was either transported above the master Appalachian (late Alleghanian) de??collement or is an autochthonous block that was overridden by the de??collement has been debated for some time. New detrital zircon geochronologic data from the cover rocks inside the window suggest this crustal block was derived from Gondwana but docked with Laurentia before the Alleghanian event. Reprocessed deep seismic reflection data from west-central Georgia (pre- and poststack noise reduction, amplitude variation analysis, and prestack depth migration) indicate that a significant band of subhorizontal reflections occurs almost continuously beneath the window collinear with the originally recognized de??collement reflections north of the window. A marked variation in the de??collement image, from strong and coherent north of the window to more diffuse directly beneath the window, is likely a partial consequence of the different geology between the Inner Piedmont and the window. The more diffuse image beneath the window may also result from imaging problems related to changes in topography and fold of cover (i.e., signal-to-noise ratio). Two alternative tectonic models for the Pine Mountain window can partially account for the observed variation in the de??collement reflectivity. (1) The Pine Mountain block could be truncated below by a relatively smooth continuation of the de??collement. The window would thus expose an allochthonous basement duplex or horse-block thrust upward from the south along the Late Proterozoic rifted continental margin. (2) The window represents localized exhumation of autochthonous basement and cover along a zone of distributed intrabasement shearing directly beneath the window. Either model is viable if only reflector geometry is considered; model (1) is favored if both geometry and kinematics of Blue Ridge-Piedmont thrust sheet emplacement are incorporated. In either model, the southern margin of the window merges to the west with the Iapetan early Alleghanian Central Piedmont suture, which juxtaposes North American-affinity Piedmont rocks to the north and exotic Panafrican rocks of the Carolina (Avalon) terrane to the south. Immediately south of the window, this suture dips southward and merges in the lower crust with the late Alleghanian suture joining the Appalachians with Gondwana. ?? 2005 Geological Society of America.

## Citation Information
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

d0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

145316

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145316

COA: 306256

Wayne CC: 06

- 006726

- FC

MICHAEL TERRENCE CANNON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Intraplate triggered earthquakes: Observations and interpretation      

      January 1, 2003    

We present evidence that at least two of the three 1811-1812 New Madrid, central United States, mainshocks and the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake triggered earthquakes at regional distances. In addition to previously published evidence for triggered earthquakes in the northern Kentucky/southern Ohio region in 1812, we present evidence suggesting that triggered events might have occurred in the Wabash Valley, to the south of the New Madrid Seismic Zone, and near Charleston, South Carolina. We also discuss evidence that earthquakes might have been triggered in northern Kentucky within seconds of the passage of surface waves from the 23 January 1812 New Madrid mainshock. After the 1886 Charleston earthquake, accounts suggest that triggered events occurred near Moodus, Connecticut, and in southern Indiana. Notwithstanding the uncertainty associated with analysis of historical accounts, there is evidence that at least three out of the four known Mw 7 earthquakes in the central and eastern United States seem to have triggered earthquakes at distances beyond the typically assumed aftershock zone of 1-2 mainshock fault lengths. We explore the possibility that remotely triggered earthquakes might be common in low-strain-rate regions. We suggest that in a low-strain-rate environment, permanent, nonelastic deformation might play a more important role in stress accumulation than it does in interplate crust. Using a simple model incorporating elastic and anelastic strain release, we show that, for realistic parameter values, faults in intraplate crust remain close to their failure stress for a longer part of the earthquake cycle than do faults in high-strain-rate regions. Our results further suggest that remotely triggered earthquakes occur preferentially in regions of recent and/or future seismic activity, which suggests that faults are at a critical stress state in only some areas. Remotely triggered earthquakes may thus serve as beacons that identify regions of long-lived stress concentration.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Susan E. Hough

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

hough@usgs.gov

626-583-7224

## Related Content

#### Susan E. Hough

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

hough@usgs.gov

626-583-7224

### Study Area

### Contacts

#### Susan E. Hough

##### Geophysicist

Earthquake Hazards Program

hough@usgs.gov

626-583-7224

### Explore Search

                  - United  States
                  - South Carolina

View All **
# L_2004267EN.01003001.xml

| 14.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/30

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1448/2004

of 13 August 2004

amending Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2), lays down that intervention butter placed on sale must have entered into storage before 1 April 2002. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 21 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 (2), lays down that intervention butter placed on sale must have entered into storage before 1 April 2002.

| (2) | Given the situation on the butter market and the quantities of butter in intervention storage it is appropriate that butter in storage before 1 June 2002 should be available for sale. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Given the situation on the butter market and the quantities of butter in intervention storage it is appropriate that butter in storage before 1 June 2002 should be available for sale.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 21 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999, the date ‘1 April 2002’ is replaced by the date ‘1 June 2002’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 August 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1236/2004 (OJ L 235, 6.7.2004, p. 4).

2

---
!"# $"$ %&'"!"# $"$ %&!'

()*+,-./01+,02)1,+1*)3*455*44*67+4

8+9*4+1:0*;<*5+)*+=0>0?+01/0+440.*+4+6@@)**4

A6.<B,C8DEF+-GHIGJHKLMNO

P Q
R
P

P



S
TPP

U



V
WX"!$WV


"Y!



SOS$
 Z
X

WX%""


VSXW 

[\X
S]
SWV]]

^
W]_
PP



`a	

\ [NX]VVX
Wb

XWV


]V
Wb

X
XV Nc






XW

XX
XW



WX

 _

d
]


W
Wb

XWV




SY#"$ NX
Wb

X


V

S

X 

P
^W
S

X

 Z
]



WX
WX%""






XX

X
 N

V

VXX


eX
SXc



S

V
 

N



WX
SXc



S



f

]
V
X
VS
W
W




 

b


Wb

X
]

SWXXW



WcXX

X
S
 g
W

b
V

h$'


WSW
]



V



X
 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-47 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
	
	


	
		
		

	
	



	
	
	
	





	



		



	
	


		



	



	

			
	
		
		

			
	
	



	



	

		
	
	


	
				



		
	
	

 
!!"""#$
%#	
&
	

	

	


	
				'



	
	
!


	
							
	



		 

&	"


	&
(	
'
)	
*+	
,
	-)*+,.

		
		
		
				


)*+,
		

	

!!""		


	



		
	
	
	



	
	



	
	
	
	)*+,
	

	

			



	/
	
	

			
	



		

	


		
	0	



	
1				


(
	
	
		
1				
)*+,

			
	
	


				
	

		
)*+,



	


		
	
	
	"

		&	"



		


	



	
	


(	

	
		

	"

23	
	
	



			


	
	

	

	
	
		
	'



	




4567889:;<8<=>:?@A<BC<D:?<CE=<FD?:D>G<=H<FF<5>IH6JJ>II>6F

&	K
	!L$	!
!	
"
"

		


	
		
	




		
	
		




	
	

				

	&	"

	
		



	
	

		
	
	
	

!
'
	

	
	
		


	



	
	
	


	

	
		


MMM



Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-47 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3422 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3422

        To prohibit the sale of billfish and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2012

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To prohibit the sale of billfish and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Billfish Conservation Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE SALE OF BILLFISH.

    (a) Prohibition.--No person shall offer for sale, sell, or have 
custody, control, or possession of for purposes of offering for sale or 
selling billfish or products containing billfish.
    (b) Penalty.--For purposes of section 308(a) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1858(a)), a 
violation of this section shall be treated as an act prohibited by 
section 307 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1857).
    (c) Exemption for Traditional Fisheries and Markets.--Subsection 
(a) does not apply to the State of Hawaii and Pacific Insular Area as 
defined in section 3(35) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802(35)), except that billfish may be 
sold under this exemption only in the United States and the Pacific 
Insular Area.
    (d) Billfish Defined.--In this section, the term ``billfish''--
            (1) means any fish of the species--
                    (A) Makaira nigricans (blue marlin);
                    (B) Kajikia audax (striped marlin);
                    (C) Istiompax indica (black marlin);
                    (D) Istiophorus platypterus (sailfish);
                    (E) Tetrapturus angustirostris (shortbill 
                spearfish);
                    (F) Kajikia albida (white marlin);
                    (G) Tetrapturus georgii (roundscale spearfish);
                    (H) Tetrapturus belone (Mediterranean spearfish); 
                and
                    (I) Tetrapturus pfluegeri (longbill spearfish); and
            (2) does not include the species Xiphias gladius 
        (swordfish).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                               Netro Corporation
                            3860 North First Street
                            San Jose, CA 95134-1702

                                 March 28, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408


        Re: Report of Independent Public Accountants by Arthur Andersen


Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the delivery of the Report of Independent Public Accountants
relating to the audit of the consolidated balance sheets of Netro Corporation as
of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2001 by Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen")
which has been included by Netro Corporation in its annual report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, Arthur Andersen has represented to
Netro that the audit was subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for
the United States accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional
standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel
working on the audit, and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen was not
relevant to the audit.

Very truly yours,

Netro Corporation

/s/ Sanjay Khare

Sanjay Khare
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32



The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No.
33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Infonet Services Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 2, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: August 11, 2004



/s/    JOSÉ A.
COLLAZOJosé A. Collazo Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infonet Services Corporation and will be retained by Infonet Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Infonet Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended July 2, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 11, 2004



/s/    AKBAR H.
FIRDOSYAkbar H. Firdosy Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infonet Services Corporation and will be retained by Infonet Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Amendment Number Three to the MPTA



 Exhibit 10.94 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO 
 THE METLIFE PLAN FOR TRANSITION ASSISTANCE
FOR OFFICERS 
 (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2010) 

THE METLIFE PLAN FOR TRANSITION ASSISTANCE FOR OFFICERS (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of the dates set forth
below, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Effective November 1, 2011, Section 1.4.05(b)(2) of the Plan is hereby amended by restating it in its entirety to read as follows: 


“The transfer of an Employee to, or the offer of employment to an Employee by, an employer other than a MetLife Enterprise Affiliate
as a result of a sale, merger, acquisition, outsourcing of a function or similar transaction, provided the Employee continues to, or the offer of employment is for the Employee to continue to, perform the same or similar duties immediately following
such transfer or immediately upon the start of employment pursuant to such offer. The determination of whether an employee continues to, or the offer of employment is for the Employee to continue to, perform the same or similar duties immediately
following such transfer or immediately upon the start of employment pursuant to such offer shall be exclusively determined by the Company or Subsidiary; or” 
  

	 	2.	Effective January 1, 2012, Section 1.4.19 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new Subsection (ii) at the end of the second paragraph thereof to
read as follows: 

 “American Life Insurance Company” 

 

	 	3.	Effective November 1, 2011, Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof to read as follows:


 “Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, with respect to an Employee whose name (or job
code, if applicable) appears on Appendix A or B of the MetLife Bank Enhanced Severance Plan for Fulfillment Employees, such Employee shall receive the greater of the Severance Pay determined under this Plan or the enhanced severance pay under the
MetLife Bank Enhanced Severance Plan for Fulfillment Employees. In no event will such Employee receive both Severance Pay under this Plan and enhanced severance pay under the MetLife Bank Enhanced Severance Plan for Fulfillment Employees.”

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company has caused this amendment to be executed by an officer thereunto duly
authorized on the date noted below the officer’s signature. 
  

			
	METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lynne E. DiStasio



			
		
	Name/Title:	 	 Lynne E. DiStasio,
Vice-President



			
		
	Date:	 	 22 December 2011



			
		
	Witness:	 	 /s/ Lucida Plummer
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued January 26, 2010

Decided January 29, 2010

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

No. 08

‐ 3269

FREDRICK H. LENOVER,

Petitioner

‐ Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

‐ Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Indiana,

Terre Haute Division.

No. 2:07

‐ cv

‐ 00369

‐ LJM

‐ JMS

Larry J. McKinney,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Fredrick Lenover is a federal prisoner who moved to vacate his sentence under 28

U.S.C. § 2255. Lenover and four codefendants were convicted of conspiring to distribute

methamphetamine and to possess methamphetamine with the intent to distribute in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and § 841(a)(1); ten additional codefendants entered into plea agreements

with the government. Lenover was sentenced to 350 months’ imprisonment. We affirmed the

convictions, United States v. Gray

, 410 F.3d 338, 349 (7th Cir. 2005), and Lenover’s sentence,

United States v. Lenover

, 182 F. App’x 563, 566 (7th Cir. 2006).

Lenover’s § 2255 motion alleged that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance because

he failed to undertake a good

‐ faith analysis of the case and thus provided unreasonable advice NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 08

‐ 3269 Page 2

that caused Lenover to reject a plea offer he otherwise would have accepted. The district court

denied Lenover’s § 2255 motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. We issued a

certificate of appealability on the question of whether trial counsel provided ineffective

assistance during the plea negotiations.

Lenover argues on appeal that the district court erred by denying his § 2255 motion without

holding an evidentiary hearing. Lenover is entitled to an evidentiary hearing under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255(b) only if he has alleged facts that, if proven, would entitle him to relief. See Sandoval v.

United States

, 574 F.3d 847, 850 (7th Cir. 2009). To prevail on his ineffective

‐ assistance claim,

Lenover must present (1) allegations that, if proven, demonstrate that counsel’s performance

during plea negotiations was objectively unreasonable, and (2) evidence that the likelihood he

was prejudiced by counsel’s constitutionally deficient performance is better than negligible.

See Strickland v. Washington

, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Julian v. Bartley

, 495 F.3d 487, 495, 499–500

(7th Cir. 2007). “Ineffective

‐ assistance claims often require an evidentiary hearing because they

frequently allege facts that the record does not fully disclose.” Osagiede v. United States

, 543

F.3d 399, 408 (7th Cir. 2008).

The government acknowledged at oral argument that it had sent a letter to Lenover’s trial

counsel requesting his take on Lenover’s allegations. But trial counsel never responded, and

the government never followed up. We believe that hearing from trial counsel would be useful,

so we VACATE the judgment and REMAND for the limited purpose of soliciting his testimony.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Landslide Hazards      

      May 1, 2000    

Landslide hazards occur in many places around What Can You Do If You Live Near Steep Hills? the world and include fast-moving debris flows, slow-moving landslides, and a variety of flows and slides initiating from volcanoes. Each year, these hazards cost billions of dollars and cause numerous fatalities and injuries. Awareness and education about these hazards is a first step toward reducing damaging effects. The U.S. Geological Survey conducts research and distributes information about geologic hazards. This Fact Sheet is published in English and Spanish and can be reproduced in any form for further distribution. 

## Citation Information

### Explore Search

                  - Landslides | Los deslizamientos de tierra
                  - Natural Hazards

View All **