alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2943 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2943

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on lutetium oxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on lutetium oxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LUTETIUM OXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.78 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to lutetium oxide) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices 

# Order

July 1, 2020

160658

160660

TAXPAYERS FOR MICHIGAN

CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, STEVE

DUCHANE, RANDALL BLUM, and SARA

KANDEL,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 160658

COA: 334663

STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF

TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET, and OFFICE OF AUDITOR GENERAL,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

TAXPAYERS FOR MICHIGAN

CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, S TEVE

DUCHANE, RANDALL BLUM, and SARA

KANDEL,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 160660

COA: 334663

STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF

TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET, and OFFICE OF AUDITOR GENERAL,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the October 29, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered, and they are GRANTED. The parties

shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the defendants violated Const

1963, art 9, §§ 25 and 30, by classifying monies paid to school districts pursuant to Proposal

A, Const 1963, art 9, § 11, as state spending in the form of aid paid to units of local

government; (2) wheth er the defendants violated Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25 and 30, byI, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 1, 2020

p0624 2

Clerk classifying monies paid to public school academies (a.k.a. charter schools) as state

spending in the form of aid paid to unit s of local government; (3) whether the Court of

Appeals erred when it held that state funds directed to local governments to satisfy state

obligations under Const 1963, art 9, § 29 may not be counted toward the proportion of state

funds required by Const 1 963, art 9, § 30; and (4) whether the Court of Appeals erred to

the extent that it held that the Auditor General or the Office of the Auditor General is

subject to mandamus relief.

The Michigan Municipal League, the Government Law Section of the State Bar of

Michigan, the Michigan Townships Association, the Michigan Association of Counties,

and Taxpayers United Michigan Foundation are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other

persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in t his case may

move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




      CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Craig Crawford, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
     2003, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the
     requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Registrant.



Date:  November 18, 2003

/s/ CRAIG CRAWFORD
-------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50307 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLIE LEE FRANKS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. CR-A-93-104

- - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charlie Lee Franks appeals the sentence imposed at resentencing following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and money laundering. Franks contends that the district court clearly erred in finding that he violated the conditions of his release and denying him a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under § 3E1.1 of the U.S.No. 95-50307 - 2 - Sentencing Guidelines. The district court’s determination that Franks violated the conditions of his release was supported by reliable information in the Presentence Report. United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995). It was not improper for the district court to deny a reduction for acceptance of responsibility based on Franks’ failure to comply with the conditions of his release. See United States v. Hooten , 942 F.2d 878, 882-83 (5th Cir. 1991). Franks also argues that the district court clearly erred in determining that he was an organizer or leader in criminal activity involving five or more participants and increasing his offense level by four points under § 3B1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The district court’s determination that Franks’ drug-trafficking scheme involved five individuals including Franks was supported by reliable information contained in the Presentence Report. See Vital , 68 F.3d at 120. The district court did not clearly err in determining that Franks’ offense level should be increased due to his role as an organizer or leader in the overall drug-trafficking scheme pursuant to § 3B1.1. See United States v. Eastland , 989 F.2d 760, 769 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 114 S.Ct. 246 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3501

_____________________________ S KYLER D. J ONES , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Brantley S. Clark
, Jr., Judge

. January 30, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , W ETHERELL , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Skyler D. Jones, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley B

. Moody , Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahass ee , for Appellee.
PNM 12.31.2011 EX 10.7






 
Exhibit 10.7
2012 Director Compensation Summary


Non-employee directors of PNM Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) receive their annual retainer in the form of cash and stock-based compensation as determined by the Company's Board of Directors. At the December 2011 Board meeting, the Board approved maintaining the 2012 annual retainer for non-employee directors at the same level previously reported for the 2011 annual retainer.   Thus, the 2012 annual retainer for non-employee directors is as follows:
	
			
	Annual Retainer:
	 
	Restricted stock rights* with a grant date market value of $55,000; and an annual cash retainer of $52,500 paid in quarterly installments

	Annual Presiding Lead Director Fee:
	 
	$15,000 paid in quarterly installments

	Annual Committee Chair Fee:
	 
	$ 5,000 paid in quarterly installments (in addition to meeting attendance fees), except that the Annual Audit and Ethics Committee Chair Fee is $10,000

	Committee Meeting Attendance Fees:
	 
	$ 1,500 per Board Committee meeting




Directors are also reimbursed for any Board-related expenses, such as travel expenses incurred to attend Board and Board committee meetings and director educational programs.  Further, directors are indemnified by the Company to the fullest extent permitted by law pursuant to the Company's bylaws and indemnification agreements between the Company and each director.


* The amount of annual restricted stock rights is determined by dividing $55,000 by the closing price of the Company's stock on the New York Stock Exchange  on the day of the grant.  Restricted stock rights granted under the Company's Omnibus Performance Equity Plan (“PEP”) each vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to vesting acceleration upon retirement from the board.  These awards are typically made at the annual meeting of directors, unless the meeting occurs during a black-out period for trading in the Company's securities as specified in the Company's Insider Trading Policy. As set forth under the Company's Equity Compensation Awards Policy, under those circumstances, the Board will either (a) schedule a special meeting after the expiration of the black-out period, (b) make awards pursuant to a unanimous written consent executed after the expiration of the black-out period, or (c) pre-approve the equity awards with an effective date after the expiration of the black-out period. The date of the awards is the date on which the Board approves the awards, unless (i) the approval date is a non-trading day, in which case the date is the immediately preceding trading date or (ii) in the case of pre-approval during a black-out period, in which case the grant date is the first trading date after the expiration of the black-out period.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3503 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3503

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of 
     work-study allowances by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 
individuals who are pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or 
   training under laws administered by the Secretary, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2012

Mr. Brown of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of 
     work-study allowances by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 
individuals who are pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or 
   training under laws administered by the Secretary, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENT OF WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCES FOR INDIVIDUALS 
              RECEIVING EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FROM DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Minimum Utilization at Educational Institutions.--Subsection 
(c) of section 3485 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as 
        subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively;
            (2) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(1) 
        Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The Secretary shall utilize the services, in connection with 
the activities specified in subsection (a)(1), of at least one 
individual described in subsection (b) at each educational institution 
that has an office established to provide assistance to a veteran who 
is enrolled in a program of education at the institution.''.
    (b) Outreach Services Conducted Through Local Government 
Agencies.--Subparagraph (G) of subsection (a)(4) of such section is 
amended by inserting ``or local government'' after ``of a State''.
    (c) Other Veterans-Related Positions in Government Entities.--
Subparagraph (J) of such subsection is amended by inserting ``or a 
Federal, State, or local government entity, as the Secretary considers 
appropriate'' before the period at the end.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3541 

To amend section 520 of the Housing Act of 1949 to revise the census 

data and population requirements for areas to be considered as rural 

areas for purposes of such Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska (for himself and Mr. JOHANNS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend section 520 of the Housing Act of 1949 to revise 

the census data and population requirements for areas 

to be considered as rural areas for purposes of such 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF RURAL AREA FOR PURPOSES 

4 OF THE HOUSING ACT OF 1949. 

5 The second sentence of section 520 of the Housing 

6 Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘1990 or 2000 decennial census 

8 shall continue to be so classified until the receipt of 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3541 IS

1 data from the decennial census in the year 2010’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘1990, 2000, or 2010 decennial cen3 sus, and any area deemed to be a ‘rural area’ for 

4 purposes of this title under any other provision of 

5 law at any time during the period beginning Janu6 ary 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2010, shall 

7 continue to be so classified until the receipt of data 

8 from the decennial census in the year 2020’’; and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘25,000’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘35,000’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           K/Na ratio of Cenozoic igneous rocks of the western United States      

      January 1, 1962    

The potassium and sodium content of chemically analysed Cenozoic igneous rocks from about 150 areas of the western United States has been examined. For each area a plot of the molecular proportion K2O(K2O + Na2O)">K2O(K2O + Na2O) [Niggli's k-value] is shown, and the projected k-value determined at 50 and 60 weight per cent SiO2. The k-values are plotted and contoured on maps of the western United States.

These maps show that potassium is least abundant relative to total alkali (when rocks of the same SiO2 content are compared) in a zone along the Pacific Coast, becomes more abundant eastward, and is highest in the Colorado Plateau and Northern Rocky Mountains.

These k-value variations can be related to regional variations in the abundance of certain trace elements and of different types of older granitic rocks, and to Bouguer gravity maps. This correspondence indicates that the alkali ratio of Cenozoic igneous rocks is closely related to the character of the crust where the rocks are formed.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona
                  -  California
                  -  Colorado
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Montana
                  -  Nevada
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah
                  -  Washington
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report of
SaviCorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Serge Monros, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to SaviCorp. and will be retained by SaviCorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: December 3, 2013 | By: /s/ SERGE MONROS   
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|                       | Serge Monros           
|                       | Chief Executive Officer
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Monique van Oord, Chief Financial Officer of Linux Gold
Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the
year ended February 28, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Linux Gold Corp.

|Richmond, BC, Canada |                          
|-------------------- | -------------------------
|                     | by:  /s/ Monique van Oord
|July 16, 2007        |                          
|                     | Monique van Oord         
|                     | Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

)

In re: ) Chapter 11

)

SEVEN STARS ON THE HUDSON CORP., ) Case No. 19-17544 

)

Debtor. )

)

AGREED MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 

ROCKIN’ JUMP, LLC’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY 

Rockin’ Jump, LLC (“Franchisor”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this 

Agreed Motion to Continue Hearing on Rockin’ Jump, LLC’s Motion for Relief from Automatic 

Stay (the “Motion”) pursuant to Local Rules 5071-1, 7090-1, and 9013-1(c)(8), seeking entry of 

an order substantially in the form of the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit A, continuing 

the hearing on Motion of Rockin’ Jump, LLC for an Order Granting Relief from the Automatic 

Stay Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) [ECF No. 39] (“Stay Relief Motion”).

1. On August 5, 2019, Franchisor filed its Stay Relief Motion. 

2. The Stay Relief Motion is currently set for an evidentiary hearing on December 3, 

2019. 

3. Franchisor and Debtor are presently engaged in meaningful settlement negotiations, 

but require additional time to determine whether they can reach a resolution of the Stay Relief 

Motion without the need for judicial intervention. 

4. Franchisor and Debtor request that in the interest of preserving judicial resources, 

as well as the estate’s and the parties’ resources, the hearing on the Stay Relief Motion be 

rescheduled to January 21, 2010. 

Case 19-17544-SMG Doc 99 Filed 11/26/19 Page 1 of 3
5. A proposed order granting this Motion is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The 

proposed order is also being uploaded to the Court pursuant to Local Rule 5005-1. 

WHEREFORE, Franchisor respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion and 

enter an order, substantially in the form of the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit A, 

continuing the hearing on the Stay Relief Motion until January 21, 2020, and granting any other 

and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. 

November 26, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Joseph M. Wasserkrug 

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

Joseph M. Wasserkrug

333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 4500

Miami, FL 33131-2184

Telephone: (305) 347-6501

Facsimile: (305) 938-2184

jwasserkrug@mwe.com

Florida Bar No. 112274

Brandon Q. White

444 W. Lake Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, IL 60606-0029

Telephone: (312) 372-2000

Facsimile: (312) 277-7504

bqwhite@mwe.com

Illinois Bar No. 6310472

Pro hac vice 

Nathan F. Coco

Two Allen Center

1200 Smith Street, Suite 1600

Houston, TX 77002-4403

Telephone: (713) 653-1700

Facsimile: (713) 583-60143

ncoco@mwe.com

Texas Bar No. 24091122

Pro hac vice

Attorneys for Rockin’ Jump, LLC

Case 19-17544-SMG Doc 99 Filed 11/26/19 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 26, 2019, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

was served by transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF to those parties 

registered to receive electronic notice of filing in this case. 

/s/ Joseph M. Wasserkrug

Joseph M. Wasserkrug

Case 19-17544-SMG Doc 99 Filed 11/26/19 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Centra Software, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Stephen A. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, of the Company, certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Stephen A. Johnson                                             
|                       |  | Stephen A. Johnson Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary