alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Edward D. Moise, Jr., certify that—     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trinsic, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have—          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function)—          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 15, 2006 /s/ *EDWARD D. MOISE, JR*.   Edward D. Moise, Jr.   Chief Financial Officer        A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Trinsic, Inc. and will beretained by Trinsic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
26
Luis MENDEZ-MULET & Marylin Mendez, Appellants, v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, successor by merger to BankAtlantic, Appellee.

Nos. 3D17-2067

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018.

Eyal I. Friedman, for appellants.

Robert M. Coplen and Kerry L. Adams (Largo), for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

Calendar No. 563 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3548 

To clarify certain provisions of the Native American Veterans’ Memorial 

Establishment Act of 1994. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

DECEMBER 11, 2012 

Reported by Mr. AKAKA, without amendment 

A BILL 

To clarify certain provisions of the Native American 

Veterans’ Memorial Establishment Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Vet5 erans’ Memorial Amendments Act of 2012’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 3548 RS

1 SEC. 2. NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS’ MEMORIAL. 

2 (a) AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.—Section 

3 3 of the Native American Veterans’ Memorial Establish4 ment Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 80q–5 note; 108 Stat. 4067) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘within the in7 terior structure of the facility’’ and inserting ‘‘on the 

8 property’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘, in con10 sultation with the Museum, is’’ and inserting ‘‘and 

11 the National Museum of the American Indian are’’. 

12 (b) PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—Section 4(a) of the 

13 Native American Veterans’ Memorial Establishment Act 

14 of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 80q–5 note; 108 Stat. 4067) is amend15 ed— 

16 (1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘AND NA17 TIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN ’’ after 

18 ‘‘AMERICAN INDIANS ’’; and 

19 (2) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘shall be 

20 solely’’ and inserting ‘‘and the National Museum of 

21 the American Indian shall be’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
Calendar No. 563 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3548 

A BILL 

To clarify certain provisions of the Native American 

Veterans’ Memorial Establishment Act of 1994. 

DECEMBER 11, 2012 

Reported without amendment 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           The landfall and inland penetration of a flood-producing atmospheric river in Arizona. Part I: observed synoptic-scale, orographic, and hydrometeorological characteristics      

      June 10, 2013    

Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are a dominant mechanism for generating intense wintertime precipitation along the U.S. West Coast. While studies over the past 10 years have explored the impact of ARs in, and west of, California’s Sierra Nevada and the Pacific Northwest’s Cascade Mountains, their influence on the weather across the intermountain west remains an open question. This study utilizes gridded atmospheric datasets, satellite imagery, rawinsonde soundings, a 449-MHz wind profiler and global positioning system (GPS) receiver, and operational hydrometeorological observing networks to explore the dynamics and inland impacts of a landfalling, flood-producing AR across Arizona in January 2010. Plan-view, cross-section, and back-trajectory analyses quantify the synoptic and mesoscale forcing that led to widespread precipitation across the state. The analyses show that a strong AR formed in the lower midlatitudes over the northeastern Pacific Ocean via frontogenetic processes and sea surface latent-heat fluxes but without tapping into the adjacent tropical water vapor reservoir to the south. The wind profiler, GPS, and rawinsonde observations document strong orographic forcing in a moist neutral environment within the AR that led to extreme, orographically enhanced precipitation. The AR was oriented nearly orthogonal to the Mogollon Rim, a major escarpment crossing much of central Arizona, and was positioned between the high mountain ranges of northern Mexico. High melting levels during the heaviest precipitation contributed to region-wide flooding, while the high-altitude snowpack increased substantially. The characteristics of the AR that impacted Arizona in January 2010, and the resulting heavy orographic precipitation, are comparable to those of landfalling ARs and their impacts along the west coasts of midlatitude continents.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

## Related Content

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona

View All **
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Optio Software, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Wayne Cape, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: December 15, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ C. Wayne Cape      
|                        |  |     |  | C. Wayne Cape          
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
# L_2007204EN.01003001.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 204/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 204/30

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 166 of 30 April 2004
  . Corrected version in
  Official Journal of the European Union L 200 of 7 June 2004
  )

In the following Act, the place of signature is to be corrected as follows:

for:

‘Done at Strasbourg, 29 April 2004.’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 29 April 2004.’

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129033 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, IN RE PAROLE OF JOSEPH W. Justices
 

BUCKNER. 

_________________________________________/ 

JOSEPH WALTER BUCKNER,

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 129033 

 COA: 258861 

Ingham CC: 03-000994-AP

PAROLE BOARD,

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

l1208 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 15, 2005 

Clerk
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 / h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Modification of wiring 14.0 $ 1,190.0 0 $ 

### 347 $ 1,537.00 

### 46 $ 70,702.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of prod ucts in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 70,702 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

**On**

**- Con**  **dition Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Corrective Action 0

. 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can als o be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act :**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quick-Med Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nam H. Nguyen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   
 Dated:  September 28, 2009                                                                                     /s/
Nam H. Nguyen
 Nam
H. Nguyen
 Chief
Financial Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Montana earthquakes noted in pennsylvania mine‐water pools      

      September 30, 1960    

A recent paper by daCosta [1959] reported water‐level fluctuations caused by the Montana earthquake of August 18, 1959, and mentioned the fluctuations registered in three mine‐water pools of the Northern anthracite field in northeastern Pennsylvania, ten miles north of Wilkes‐Barre. This paper will discuss the water‐level phenomena of these pools in more detail. Most of the coal mines near Wilkes‐Barre are idle, and ground water is forming extensive mine‐water pools in the underground mine openings. Some of the pools are interconnected by boreholes, tunnels, and other openings through the barrier pillars between adjacent mines.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United  States
                  - Montana

View All **
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

Case No. 19-24331-PDR

Ralph Levi Sanders,

Chapter 13

Debtor.

/

ORDER CONTINUING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO REFER

The Court heard the pro se Debtor’s Verified Motion for Referral to Mortgage 

Modification Mediation on August 2, 2021. (Doc. 163). For the reasons stated on the 

record, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Motion (Doc. 163) is CONTINUED to September 13, 2021, at 1:00 

p.m. by Zoom Video Conference. 

2. To participate in the hearing remotely via Zoom (whether by video or by 

telephone), you must register in advance no later than 3:00 p.m., one business day 

before the date of the hearing. Participants may register using the following link:

Peter D. Russin, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 9, 2021.

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 184 Filed 08/11/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItcOqurD4qHUbwAimE

NeAkZ7QUKGhcZ7k.

# # #

Copies To:

All parties in interest.

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 184 Filed 08/11/21 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3658 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3658

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 300 Fayetteville Street in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ``Jesse 
         Helms Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2012

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 300 Fayetteville Street in Raleigh, North Carolina, as the ``Jesse 
         Helms Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 300 
Fayetteville Street in Raleigh, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jesse Helms Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Jesse Helms Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 2****CONSENTOF GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.**We hereby consent to the reference to us in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Pengrowth EnergyTrust and all other references to our name included or incorporated by reference in: (i) Pengrowth EnergyTrust’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2006; and (ii) registration statementon Form F-10 (File No. 333-134527), filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, asamended as applicable.        Date:  March 30, 2007 /s/Doug R. Sutton Calgary, AlbertaGLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Rescue Concepts, Inc. v. HouReal Corporation

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00 5 53

- C V

Trial court case number: 20 1 4

- 71749

Trial court: 270 th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: September 1 2 , 20 2 2

Party filing motion: Appell ee /Cross

- Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April L. Farris

Acting Individually Acting for the Court

The En Banc Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau,

Hightower, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra, and Farris

.

Date: November 2 2 , 20 2 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Minutes of the National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council, September 8 and 9, 1985, Anchorage, Alaska      

      January 1, 1986    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information
C.M. v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2150984

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

65412

Vol. 67, No. 206

Thursday, October 24, 2002

DEPARMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Docket 48–2002] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 185—Culpeper, 

Virginia; Application For Foreign-Trade 

Subzone Status, Flint Ink North 

America Corporation (Pigments, Inks, 

and Varnish Products) Weyers Cave, 

VA

Correction 

In notice document 02–26416 

beginning on page 64095 in the issue of 

Thursday, October 17, 2002, make the 

following correction: 

On page 64096, in the first column, in 

the third full paragraph, in the sixth 

line, ‘‘January 2, 2003’’ should read 

‘‘December 31, 2002’’.

[FR Doc. C2–26416 Filed 10–23–02; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CP03–1–000] 

El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice 

of Application 

October 10, 2002.

Correction 

In notice document 02–26386 

beginning on page 64108 in the issue of 

Thursday, October 17, 2002, make the 

following correction: 

On page 64108, in the second column, 

the docket number is corrected to read 

as set forth above.

[FR Doc. C2–26386 Filed 10–23–02; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D