alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.13



 EXHIBIT 10.13 
 HealthStream, Inc. (the “Company”) 
 Summary of Director and
Executive Officer Compensation 
 I. Director Compensation. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional
compensation for serving as directors of the Company. The following table sets forth current rates of cash compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors. 
  

					
	 Retainers and Fees
	  	2011	 
	 Annual Retainer fee
	  	$	2,000	  
	 Board meeting fee
	  	$	1,000	  
	 Committee chair meeting fee
	  	$	1,000	  
	 Committee member meeting fee
	  	$	500	  

 In addition to the cash compensation set forth above, each non-employee director is eligible to receive a
nondiscretionary annual grant of a non-qualified option for the purchase of 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The option is granted in connection with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, vests over a three year period, and has an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the grant date. 
 II. Executive Officer Compensation. The following table
sets forth the current base salaries and the fiscal 2011 performance bonuses provided to our executive officers, including the individuals who the Company expects to be its Named Executive Officers for 2012. 

 

									
	 Executive Officer
	  	Current
Salary	 	  	Fiscal
2011
Bonus
Amount	 
	 Robert A. Frist, Jr.
	  	$	245,000	  	  	$	85,750	  
	 Arthur E. Newman
	  	$	225,000	  	  	$	78,750	  
	 J. Edward Pearson
	  	$	232,500	  	  	$	81,375	  
	 Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
	  	$	221,000	  	  	$	77,350	  
	 Jeffrey S. Doster
	  	$	221,000	  	  	$	77,350	  
	 Michael Sousa
	  	$	185,000	  	  	$	18,500	  

 III. Additional Information. The foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional information regarding
Director and Named Executive Officer compensation will be contained in the Company’s 2012 Proxy Statement.
The HONORABLE WILLIAM R. WILSON, JR., United States District 1

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

____________________

Nos. 95-3596/95-3722

_____________________

James Edward Wright, Jr., *

 *

Appellant/Cross-Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Calion Lumber Company, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee/Cross-Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: July 8, 1996

 Filed: July 9, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Wright, Jr., an African-American, sued his former

employer, Calion Lumber Company, alleging that Calion discriminated against

him on the basis of his race by subjecting him to adverse employment

conditions after learning that Wright was married to a Caucasian woman.

Following a three-day trial, an eight-member jury delivered a verdict in

favor of Calion, and the district court entered judgment dismissing the

1

case. Wright appeals, and we affirm. 

Wright's first argument--that his appointed attorney rendered

inadequate representation--does not entitle him to relief in this appeal.

See Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988)
(litigant in civil proceeding has no constitutional or statutory right to

appointment and effective assistance of attorney).

Wright next argues that only one of the jurors was a member of a

minority group. Significantly, Wright does not argue that the jury venire

panel was compiled in an unconstitutional or illegal manner, or that Calion

exercised peremptory challenges to strike jurors from the panel on the

basis of their race. Cf. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., Inc., 500

U.S. 614, 616, 628-31 (1991); Floyd v. Garrison, 996 F.2d 947, 949 (8th

Cir. 1993). This claim also fails.

Finally, Wright complains that all of the witnesses testified he was

the victim of discrimination, the witnesses for Calion were biased, and the

jury ignored testimony that his supervisor used the word "nigger" on the

job site. However, this is not a sufficient basis for overturning an

adverse jury verdict. 

Accordingly, we affirm. We also dismiss Calion's cross-appeal at its

request.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
14 CFR Part 39

1491~13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal AviatJon Administration

1~73

(Docket No. FAA-ZOI0-*'*"***; Directorate [((cntifier 2010-NM-089-AD]

R1N21Z~AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310-203, -204, -222. -3.04. -322. and -324

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airwl?rthiness directive (AD) for the prOOuc

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness ,

infonnation (MeAD originated by an aviation ~ulhority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the u[lsaf

condition as: I

A specific area. the lower tail plalle cut-out located in the tail cone is

subject LO an inspection programme (for:cracking] *,. *.

I

The unsafe condition is reduced structural Integrity of the tail cone. The proposed AD

would require actions that are intended to addr~slthe unsafe condition described in the

MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER).

~"'10 I~ ..:J

~.~::'//1

o

I

FAA Form 1360·14.1 (6..89) OFF'JCrAL RLE COpy
To: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas Clerk

P.O.BOX 1230B

Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 7B711

FromiOohnny Q.CClawson, 3r.1578^31

Terrell 1300FM655

Rosharon,Tx. 775B3

"1W U>qq~0S

DECEIVED IH

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

30 2015

sta,

Re: copies of records,in lilR-74,699-05

Dear Abel Acosto, Clerk

Could you please tell me how much it mill cost me to get a copy of all

documents which were filed in the above styled and numbered cause by th 6th

District Court Clerk of Lamar County.

Thank you for your valuable time and effort as I await your reply.

Sincerly Your,
# L_2005204DE.01002401.xml

| 5.8.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 204/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 204/24

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2004/83/EG des Rates vom 29. April 2004 über Mindestnormen für die Anerkennung und den Status von Drittstaatsangehörigen oder Staatenlosen als Flüchtlinge oder als Personen, die anderweitig internationalen Schutz benötigen, und über den Inhalt des zu gewährenden Schutzes

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 304 vom 30. September 2004
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 304 vom 30. September 2004

Seite 21, Artikel 24 Absatz 1 Unterabsatz 1:

anstatt:

„(1)   So bald wie möglich nach Zuerkennung des Schutzstatus und unbeschadet des Artikels 19 Absatz 3 ...“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   So bald wie möglich nach Zuerkennung des Schutzstatus und unbeschadet des Artikels 21 Absatz 3 ...“.

Seite 21, Artikel 27 Absatz 2:

anstatt:

„..., zu denselben Bedingungen wie Drittstaatsangehörigen mit regelmäßigem Aufenthalt ...“

muss es heißen:

„..., zu denselben Bedingungen wie Drittstaatsangehörigen mit rechtmäßigem Aufenthalt ....“.

---
EXHIBIT 3

Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 1 of 6
Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 2 of 6
Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 3 of 6
Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 4 of 6
Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 5 of 6
Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-3 Filed 07/19/19 Page 6 of 6
# L_2007204EN.01002802.xml

| 4.8.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 204/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 204/28

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EEC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 158 of 30 April 2004
  . Corrected version in
  Official Journal of the European Union L 229 of 29 June 2004
  )

In the following Act, the place of signature is to be corrected as follows:

for:

‘Done at Strasbourg, 29 April 2004.’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 29 April 2004.’

---
Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Michael J. Marx, the Chief Financial Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-K/A of Nano Mask for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 10-K/A) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.   /s/ Michael J. Marx Michael J. Marx Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  July 27, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3446 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3446

   To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to halt the premature 
proposed listing of 4 central Texas salamander species resulting from a 
settlement agreement, and to take into account extensive, ongoing State 
                    and local conservation efforts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2012

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to halt the premature 
proposed listing of 4 central Texas salamander species resulting from a 
settlement agreement, and to take into account extensive, ongoing State 
                    and local conservation efforts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Salamander Community Conservation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN SALAMANDERS.

    Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1539) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(k) Certain Salamanders.--Section 4(a) shall not apply to--
            ``(1) the Austin blind salamander;
            ``(2) the Georgetown salamander;
            ``(3) the Jollyville Plateau salamander; or
            ``(4) the Salado salamander.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF B. GRANT HUNTER**Certification of Periodic Report**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Thermal Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B. Grant Hunter, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                 /s/ B. Grant Hunter   B. Grant Hunter  May 14, 2007 Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Juan Pablo Bruzual Case No. 19-21823-PDR

Chapter 13

Debtor.

 ____ /

iAGREED ORDER DENYNG MOTION TO QUASH

This cause came before the Court upon Omitted Creditor, USAG Logistics, LLC’s

Motion to Quash. Debtor and USAG Logistics, LLC having agreed to the entry of this 

Order in accordance with the terms set forth herein.

Consequently, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. USAG Logistics, LLC’s Motion to Quash [DE 145] is denied.

2. USAG Logistics, LLC agrees to have been properly served and accepts service 

of Debtor’s Amended Verified Motion for Leave to Amend Schedules to Case 

Peter D. Russin, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 15, 2023.

Case 19-21823-PDR Doc 156 Filed 03/15/23 Page 1 of 2
to Add Creditor [DE 140].

3. The Debtor and USAG Logistics, LLC agree to continue the hearing on Debtor’s 

Amended Verified Motion for Leave to Amend Schedules to Case to Add 

Creditor [DE 140] scheduled for hearing on March 9, 2023 within a month.

###

Submitted by:

Ricardo A Rodriguez, Esq.

14261 Commerce Way, Suite 105

Miami Lakes, FL 33016

305.262.8226

Attorney Ricardo A Rodriguez shall serve a copy of this Order on all interested parties 

and file a Certificate of Service within three (3) days of its entry.

i The parties agreed by and through counsel. Ricardo A. Rodriguez, Esquire represents the Debtor and Zachary P. 

Hyman with Millennial Law, Inc., represents USAG Logistics LLC.

 

Case 19-21823-PDR Doc 156 Filed 03/15/23 Page 2 of 2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

s0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139408

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139408 COA: 291627 Kalamazoo CC: 80-000188-FY FRANKIE LEE WEATHERSPOON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 1, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re: Case No. 18-16248-BKC-MAM 

 Chapter 7 

CHANCE & ANTHEM, LLC, 

 

 Debtor. 

 / 

ROBERT C. FURR not individually but ADV. NO. 19-01298-MAM 

as Chapter 7 Trustee of the estate of the 

Debtor, Chance & Anthem, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

JEFFREY M. SISKIND, individually and 

d/b/a SISKIND LEGAL SERVICES, 

et al.

 Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO SERVE EXPERT REPORT [ECF NO. 455] 

THIS MATTER came before the Court on September 30, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. on the 

Defendant, Jeffrey Siskind’s Emergency Motion to Extend Time to Serve Expert Report [ECF 

No. 455] (the “Motion”) and Chapter 7 Trustee Robert C. Furr’s Response to Second Emergency 

Mindy A. Mora, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on October 2, 2020.

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 462 Filed 10/02/20 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Motion to Extend Time to Serve Expert Reports and to Extend Discovery Deadlines [ECF No. 

457] (the “Response”). The Court having reviewed the Motion, Response and pleadings in the 

case and having heard arguments of counsel, it is hereby, 

ORDERED, as follows: 

1. The Motion is DENIED, for lack of prosecution. 

### 

Submitted by: 

Jesus M. Suarez, Esq. 

Counsel for the Plaintiff 

Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. 

100 SE 2nd Street, Suite 4400 

Miami, FL 33131 

Tel: (305) 349-2300 

Email: jsuarez@gjb-law.com

[Attorney Suarez shall serve a copy of this Order to all interested parties and file a certificate of 

service] 

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 462 Filed 10/02/20 Page 2 of 2
Summary of Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.10 
 Summary of Compensation Payable to Named Executive Officers 
 Base Salary.
The Compensation and Leadership Development Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo!”) has approved the 2012 base salaries of Yahoo!’s principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, and the other persons named in the Summary Compensation Table of Yahoo!’s Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2011 who are currently employed as executive officers by Yahoo! (together,
the “Named Executive Officers”). The following table shows for each of the Named Executive Officers the annual base salary for 2012: 
  

					
	 Name and Principal Position
	  	2012
Annual
Base
Salary ($)	 
	 Scott Thompson
	  			
	 Chief Executive Officer
	  	 	1,000,000	  
	 Timothy R. Morse
	  			
	 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	 	750,000	  
	 Blake Irving
	  			
	 Executive Vice President and Chief Product Officer
	  	 	755,000	  
	 Ross B. Levinsohn
	  			
	 Executive Vice President, Americas
	  	 	700,000	  
	 Michael J. Callahan
	  			
	 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	  	 	500,000	  

 Bonus. In addition to receiving a base salary, Yahoo!’s Named Executive Officers are also eligible to
receive an annual bonus. 
 Yahoo!’s Named Executive Officer bonuses for 2012 will be determined under Yahoo!’s Executive Incentive
Plan. The Named Executive Officers’ respective target bonus opportunities (expressed as a percentage of annual base salary) under the Executive Incentive Plan for 2012 are as follows: Mr. Thompson – 200%, Mr. Morse – 120%,
Mr. Irving – 120%, Mr. Levinsohn – 120%, and Mr. Callahan – 90%. The Committee also has the ability to award discretionary bonuses from time to time in circumstances the Committee determines to be appropriate.

 Long-Term Incentives. The Named Executive Officers are also eligible to receive equity-based incentives and other awards from
time to time at the discretion of the Committee. Equity-based incentives granted by Yahoo! to the Named Executive Officers are reported on Form 4 filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report
of SaviCorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Serge Monros, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SaviCorp and will be retained by SaviCorp and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: October 25, 2013 | By: /s/ SERGE MONROS   
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|                       | Serge Monros           
|                       | Chief Financial Officer
# L_2004244EN.01005001.xml

| 16.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/50

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 July 2004

appointing a new member of the Commission of the European Communities

(2004/549/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 215 thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Olli REHN is hereby appointed a member of the Commission for the period from 12 July 2004 to 31 October 2004.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 12 July 2004.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2004.

For the Council

The President

B. BOT

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Richard Moraw and James Perry, Trustees of the Scott Family

Trust (Irrevocable )

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00102

- CV

Trial court case number: 102448

- CV

Tr ial court: 149th District Court of Brazo ria County

Relators have filed an e mergency m otion to stay the jury trial scheduled to begin

February 3, 2020 p ending r esolution of th e ir petition for w rit of mandamus . The motion is

granted

. All proceedings in In r e: Scott Family Trust (Irre vocable) , No. 102448

- CV , in the

149th District Court of Braz oria County, Texas, are stayed. The stay is effective until disposition

of relators’ petition for writ of mandamus or further order of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Jud ge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Countiss

_______________ A cting individually

Date: January 31, 2020
EXHIBIT 31.2I, Karim Hirji, certify that:1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Oilsands Quest Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andhave: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions containedin SEC Release 34-47986]  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors; (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.March 15, 2007   /s/ Karim Hirji Karim Hirji, Chief Financial Officer