Oil/14/201 0 12:4 5 FAX 202493514 2 FA A • > OM S 21001/00 2

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D C I n th e Matte r

of : PINNACL E AIRLINES . INC . FAA Order

No . 2010- 2 Docke t No . CP09SO000 2 FDM S No . FAA-2009-0180 ' Served : Marc h 26 , 201 0 ORDE RDENYIN G RESPONDENT' S PETilTO N T O FIL E AN ADDITIONA L BRIE F ^ Respondent

Pinnacl e Airlines , inc . (Pinnacle) , b y counsel , ha s file d apetitio n seekin g leav e to file a

n additional brie f

under 1 4 C.r.R . § 13.233(f

) t o sho w that

some o f Complainant' s argument s i n it s repl y brie f are "unsupporte d and/o r

directl y contradicle d b y th e record. " Pinnacl e explaine dthat i t seek s "t o correc t

an d claril y an y misleadin g or unclea r portion s o f

th e Complainant' s Repl y Brie f in a n additional brie f

o f 1 5 page s o r less . Complainan t

object s t o th e filin g of

a n additional brief

, contendin g that

Pinnacl e ha s no t show n goo dcaus e t o fil e a n additional brief

. Th e Rule s o f

Practic e provid e tha

t aparty ma

y no t lil e more tha

n on e appeal brie f o r one repl y brief

, althoug h "[t]h e FAA decisionmaker ma y grant leav e t o fil e a

n 

### leiOFirAHSrUHi

/

' Generally , material s filed i n th e FA A Hearin g Docke t (excep t fo r material s file

d i n securit y cfl-scs ) ar e als o availabl

e fo r viewin g a t http://www.regnlaUons.gov . Se e 1 4 C.K.R . § 13.210(e)(1) . Th

e transcript , an

dothe r item s file d i n the recor d i n thi s cas e (FDM

S Docke t No . FA A 2009-0579) , ar

e available a

t thi s We b site . " Th e Administrator' s civil penalt y decisions , alon

g wit h indexe s o

f th e decisions , th

e rule s o f practice , an

dothe r infomiation , ar

e available o

n th e Interne t a t th e followin g address ; www.faa.gox/uhout/offic

e org/headquarter\_offices/agc/pol_cKijudicaiion/AGC40Q / Civil_Penalry . Se

e 14 C.F.R . § 13.210(e)(2) . I n addition , Thomso

n Reuters/West

publishe s Federa l Aviatio n Decisions . Finally , the decision s ar e available throug

h LEXIS (TRAN

S library ) an d WestLa w (PfRAN-FA

A database) . Fo

r additiona l information , se

e th e We b site .04/14/201 0 12:4 5 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S 121002/00 2

additional brie f

i f th e part y demonstrate s goo d caus e fo r allowin g additiona l argumen t

.... " 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.233(f)(emphasi s added. ) Pinnacl e ha s faile dt o sho w goo d caus e t o fil e additional argument , fh e FAA' s repl y brie f

contain s comprehensiv e lega l citation s and reference s t o th e record . Th e Administrato r

shoul db e abl e t o asses s withou t additional briefin g whethe r thes e citation s an dreference s actuall y suppor t th e argument s tha t

th e FAA mad e i n it s repl y brief , an d whether th e evidenc e relie dupo n b y th e FAA i n it s repl y brie f wa s contradicte d b y other evidenc e i n th e record . Therefore , Pinnacle' s reques t t o file additional argumen t i s denied . J . RANDOLP H BABBIT T ADMINISTRATO R Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n VICK I S^^EMON ' Manager , Adjudicatio n Branc h

^ Issue dunde r authorit y delegate dt o th e Chie f Counse l an d the Assistan

t Chie f Counse l fo r Litigation b

y memorandu

mdate dOctobe r 27 , 1992 , unde

r 4 9 U.SC . § 322(b ) an

d 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.20 2 (se e 5 7 Fed . Reg . 58,28 0 (1992) ) an d redelegate

d b y the Assistan

t Chie f Counse l fo r Litigatio n t o the Manager, Adjudicatio n Branch , b

y Memorandu

mdate d August 6 , 1993 .