alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 19-22933-RAM Doc 68 Filed 01/17/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-22933-RAM Doc 68 Filed 01/17/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-22933-RAM Doc 68 Filed 01/17/20 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60134

Summary Calendar

VERA M. WALKER

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

EAST CENTRAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, INC.

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Federal courts are limited in their authority to consider the merits of

controversies or order relief from unfair conduct unless given the jurisdiction to

do so by law. That law comes from Congress and prior court decisions. The

district court has explained accurately by the order of January 11, 2010, why the

Plaintiff has failed to present to the court sufficient admissible evidence to allow

it to proceed with the claim that there has been a violation of federal statutes or

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 27, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60134 Document: 00511245338 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2010
No. No. 10-60134

Summary Calendar

state tort law. Plaintiff in her brief to this court points to nothing in the record

to affect the district court’s judgment. Consequently, the judgment must be

affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-60134 Document: 00511245338 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2010
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 19-24244-BKC-RAM

PROCEEDING UNDER CHAPTER 13

IN RE:

ANGELICA EMILIA EUCEDA

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF DELINQUENCY

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE the above-referenced Debtor is delinquent in Confirmed Chapter 13 Plan 

Payments in the amount of $1887.72.

The Debtor shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of this Notice to make all payments due under 

the Confirmed Plan/Modified Plan, INCLUDING ANY PAYMENTS THAT BECOME DUE WITHIN 

THE FORTY-FIVE (45) DAY PERIOD, in the form of a money order or cashier's check only. Payments 

must be sent to:

DEBTOR

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 2099

MEMPHIS, TN 38101-2099

If the Chapter 13 Trustee ("Trustee") does not receive all payments by December 5, 2021 to bring the 

Debtor totally current under the Confirmed Plan/Modified Plan, or if applicable, a Motion to Modify has 

not been timely filed and set within fifteen (15) days of this Notice pursuant to the Confirmation Order, the 

Trustee may file and serve a Report of Non-Compliance.

As a result of the Debtor failure to become current or timely file a Motion to Modify, the case shall be 

dismissed without further notice or hearing.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Notice of Delinquency was served, via U.S. 

first class mail and/or CM/ECF, upon the parties listed on the attached service list this 21st day of October 

2021.

/s/ Nancy K. Neidich

NANCY K. NEIDICH, ESQUIRE

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE

P.O. BOX 279806

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806

_____________________________________

Case 19-24244-RAM Doc 88 Filed 10/21/21 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF DELINQUENCY

CASE NO.: 19-24244-BKC-RAM

SERVICE LIST

COPIES FURNISHED TO:

DEBTOR

ANGELICA EMILIA EUCEDA

1290 NW 53 ST

MIAMI, FL 33142

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR

MICHAEL A. FRANK, ESQUIRE

UNION PLANTERS BNK BLDG #620

10 NW LEJEUNE RD

MIAMI, FL 33126-5431

Case 19-24244-RAM Doc 88 Filed 10/21/21 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification**
     I, David E. Kennedy, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Susquehanna Media Co., “the Registrant”;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):
     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the Registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls; and
     6. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.     Date: March 31, 2005 /s/ David E. Kennedy       David E. Kennedy   Principal Executive Officer  
77
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Linking dissolved organic matter composition to landscape properties in wetlands across the United States of America      

      May 3, 2024    

Wetlands are integral to the global carbon cycle, serving as both a source and a sink for organic carbon. Their potential for carbon storage will likely change in the coming decades in response to higher temperatures and variable precipitation patterns. We characterized the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic matter (DOM) composition from 12 different wetland sites across the USA spanning gradients in climate, landcover, sampling depth, and hydroperiod for comparison to DOM in other inland waters. Using absorption spectroscopy, parallel factor analysis modeling, and ultra-high resolution mass spectroscopy, we identified differences in DOM sourcing and processing by geographic site. Wetland DOM composition was driven primarily by differences in landcover where forested sites contained greater aromatic and oxygenated DOM content compared to grassland/herbaceous sites which were more aliphatic and enriched in N and S molecular formulae. Furthermore, surface and porewater DOM was also influenced by properties such as soil type, organic matter content, and precipitation. Surface water DOM was relatively enriched in oxygenated higher molecular weight formulae representing HUPHigh O/C compounds than porewaters, whose DOM composition suggests abiotic sulfurization from dissolved inorganic sulfide. Finally, we identified a group of persistent molecular formulae (3,489) present across all sites and sampling depths (i.e., the signature of wetland DOM) that are likely important for riverine-to-coastal DOM transport. As anthropogenic disturbances continue to impact temperate wetlands, this study highlights drivers of DOM composition fundamental for understanding how wetland organic carbon will change, and thus its role in biogeochemical cycling.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Kimberly Wickland

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

kpwick@usgs.gov

303-541-3072

#### Sheel Bansal, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

sbansal@usgs.gov

701-368-0222

## Related Content

#### Kimberly Wickland

##### Research Ecologist

Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center

kpwick@usgs.gov

303-541-3072

#### Sheel Bansal, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

sbansal@usgs.gov

701-368-0222

### Contact

####               Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center          

Denver Federal CenterBuilding 25Denver, CO80225-0046United States

303-236-5345

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnitude and frequency of summer floods in western New Mexico and eastern Arizona      

      January 1, 1955    

View Report

Numerous small reservoirs and occasional water-spreading structures are being built on the ephemeral streams draining the public and Indian lands of the Southwest as part of the Soil and Moisture Conservation Program of the Bureau of Land Management and Bureau of Indian Affairs.  Economic design of these structures requires some knowledge of the flood rates and volumes.  Information concerning flood frequencies on areas less than 100 square miles is deficient throughout the country, particularly on intermittent streams of the Southwest.  Design engineers require a knowledge of the frequency and magnitude of flood volumes for the planning of adequate reservoir capacities and a knowledge of frequency and magnitude of flood peaks for spillway design.  Hence, this study deals with both flood volumes and peaks, the same statistical methods being used to develop frequency curves for each.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona
                  -  New Mexico

View All **
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TAYLOR JEFFERSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 205 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of December, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 10.12 - Amendment to Pension Program




Exhibit 10.12


AMENDMENT TO 
CINCINNATI BELL INC. PENSION PROGRAM
The Cincinnati Bell Inc. Pension Program (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of December 31, 2011 and in order to provide that any amendments made to the Cincinnati Bell Management Pension Plan that both reduce benefits (or the rate of benefit accruals) under such plan and become effective on or after December 31, 2011 will be disregarded when determining the benefits provided under the Plan to any Plan participant, by revising Plan subsection 2.14 in its entirety to read as follows. 
2.14    “Pension Plan” means the Cincinnati Bell Management Pension Plan, as such plan exists as of the Effective Amendment Date and as it may thereafter be amended, including both the part of such plan that is intended to qualify as a tax-favored plan under Section 401(a) of the Code and the part of such plan that is not intended to qualify as a tax-favored plan under Section 401(a) of the Code and instead is subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, but disregarding any amendment made to any part of such plan that both reduces any benefits (or the rate of benefit accruals) under such plan and becomes effective on or after December 31, 2011.  The Pension Plan is a defined benefit pension plan that is sponsored by CBI.
IN ORDER TO EFFECT THE FOREGOING PLAN CHANGE, the Plan's sponsor, Cincinnati Bell Inc., has caused its name to be subscribed to this Plan amendment.  
	
			
	 
	 
	 

	 
	CINCINNATI BELL INC.

	 
	By:
	Christopher J. Wilson

	 
	Title:
	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

	 
	Date:
	December 20, 2010
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 22, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-872

Lower Tribunal No. F12-30062

________________

Thaddeus Chaylon Martin,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.

Thaddeus Chaylon Martin, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





May 17,
2010





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ohio Legacy Corp (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for three months ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.





/s/ Rick L. Hull
                
                /s/ Jane MarshRick
      L. Hull
                
                Jane
      MarshPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                
                Senior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand
      Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Averox Inc. ("Averox") on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Salman Mahmood, Chief Executive Officer
of Averox, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Date: February 17, 2009

                                                              /s/ Salman Mahmood
                                                              ------------------
                                                                  Salman Mahmood
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2010-NE-38-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 7.0 $ 595.00 $15,800 $16,395.00 110 $1,803,450.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,803,450

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA-IR-M-8040.1C. DOUBLE CLICK to follow the link

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 134
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5,631
<PP&E>                                              93,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      99,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              (82,511)
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            (6,905)
<OTHER-SE>                                          (9,815)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        99,231
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     9,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (9,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (9,937)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (9,937)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
Certificate Number: 05781-FLS-DE-033344252

Bankruptcy Case Number: 19-21551

05781-FLS-DE-033344252

CERTIFICATE OF DEBTOR EDUCATION

I CERTIFY that on September 3, 2019, at 9:16 o'clock PM PDT, John Swift

completed a course on personal financial management given by internet by Sage

Personal Finance, a provider approved pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 111 to provide an

instructional course concerning personal financial management in the Southern

District of Florida.

Date: September 3, 2019 By: /s/Allison M Geving

Name: Allison M Geving

Title: President

Case 19-21551-LMI Doc 10 Filed 09/05/19 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Averox Inc. ("Averox") on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Salman Mahmood, Chief Executive Officer of Averox,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: May 12, 2008


                                                              /s/ Salman Mahmood
                                                         -----------------------
                                                                  Salman Mahmood
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
Stacey L. VanBelleghem 

Direct Dial: 202.637.2153 

stacey. vanbelieghem@lw.com 

555 Eleventh Street, NW., Suite 1000 

Washington, D.C. 20004-1304 

Tel: +1.202.637.2200 Fax: +1.202.637.2201 

www.lw.com 

FIRM I AFFILIATE OFFICES LATHAM&WATKI N SLLP 

Abu Dhabi Milan 

Barcelona Moscow 

Beijing Munich 

Boston New Jersey 

Brussels New York 

September 20, 2013 	 Chicago Orange County 

Doha Paris 

Dubai Riyadh 

Dusseldorf Rome 

Ahmar Siddiqui, CBI Document Control Officer 	 Frankfurt San Diego 

Office of Water 	 Hamburg San Francisco 

U.S. Hong Kong Shanghai EPA 

Houston Silicon Valley William Jefferson Clinton Building West London Singapore 

Room 6231S 	 Los Angeles Tokyo 

Washington, DC 20460 	 Madrid Washington, D.C. 

Attention: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819: Confidential Business Information 

Dear Mr. Siddiqui: 

Attached please find a Confidential Business Information (CBI) version ofthe comments 

of Midwest Generation, LLC on EPA's Proposed "Eff1uent Limitations Guidelines And 

Standards For The Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category" for the EPA Office 

of Water Docket, No. EPA-HQ- OW-2009-0819. The version ofMidwest Generation's 

comments not containing CBI will be ~ubmitted electronically today through 

www.regulations.gov, and is labeled on each page "Public Version-Does Not Contain CBI." The 

version of Midwest Generation's comments containing CBI is labeled on each page 

"Confidential Business Information Included." This submission is made on behalf of: 

Basil G. Constantelos 

Managing Director, Environmental Services 

Midwest Generation 

235 Remington Blvd., Suite A 

Bolingbrook, IL 60440 

Tel: 630-771-7829 

bconstantelos@mwgen.com 

Respectfully submitted, 

Stacey 

~VfJh~ L. VanBelleghem 

of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 

Enclosures