alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.55



 Exhibit 10.55 
 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE PROGESSIVE CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED
COMPENSATION TRUST 
 (November 8, 2002 Amendment and Restatement) 

THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT, dated and effective as of the thirteenth day of June, 2011, unless otherwise specified herein, by and
between Fidelity Management Trust Company (the “Trustee”) and The Progressive Corporation (the “Company”); 

WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Company heretofore entered into a Trust Agreement dated November 8, 2002, with regard to The Progressive Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Trust (the
“Trust”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Sponsor hereby directs the Trustee, in accordance with Section 5 and 8(g) of
the Trust Agreement, as follows: (i) at the close of business (4:00p.m. ET) (“Market Close”) on June 14, 2011, to liquidate all participant balances held in the Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor Shares at its
net asset value on such day, and to invest the proceeds in the Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares at its net asset value on such day; (ii) to redirect all participant contributions directed to the Vanguard Total
International Stock Index Fund Investor Shares after the Market Close on June 14, 2011 to be invested in the Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares; and (iii) to permit no further investments in the Vanguard
Total International Stock Index Fund Investor Shares as an investment option for the Plan after the Market Close on June 14, 2011. The parties hereto agree that the Trustee shall have no discretionary authority with respect to this sale and
transfer directed by the Sponsor. Any variation from the procedure described herein may be instituted only at the express written direction of the Sponsor; and 
 WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Company now desire to amend said Trust Agreement as provided for in Section 12 thereof; 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the Trustee and the Company hereby amend the Trust Agreement by: 
  

	 	(1)	Effective at Market Close on June 13, 2011, amending the “investment options” section of Schedule “A” to add the following:


  

	 	•	Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares 

  

	 	(2)	Effective at Market Close on June 14, 2011, amending the “investment options” section of Schedule “A” to delete the following:


  

	 	•	Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor Shares 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee and the Company have caused this Seventh Amendment to
be executed by their duly authorized officers effective as of the day and year first above written. By signing below, the undersigned represent that they are authorized to execute this document on behalf of the respective parties. Notwithstanding
any contradictory provision of the agreement that this document amends, each party may rely without duty of inquiry on the foregoing representation. 
  

													
	THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION	 		 	FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY
							
	By:	 	 	 	 	 		 	By:	 	 	 	 
		 	Its Authorized Signatory	 	Date	 		 		 	Its Authorized Signatory	 	Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,255)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (20,805)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,805)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

THERASENSE, INC. (NOW KNOWN AS ABBOTT 

DIABETES CARE, INC.) 

AND ABBOTT LABORATORIES, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, 

AND NOVA BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND

BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

__________________________ 

2008-1511, -1512, -1513, -1514, -1595 

__________________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in consolidated case nos. 

04-CV-2123, 04-CV-3327, 04-CV-3732, and 05-CV-3117, 

Judge William H. Alsup. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
2

__________________________ 

TIVO INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

ECHOSTAR CORPORATION, 

ECHOSTAR DBS CORPORATION, 

ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, 

ECHOSPHERE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 

ECHOSTAR SATELLITE LLC, 

AND DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

__________________________ 

2009-1374 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in case no. 2:04-CV-01, Judge 

David Folsom. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION 

__________________________ 

O R D E R 

Oral arguments en banc for the above-noted appeals 

are scheduled for Tuesday, November 9, 2010, in courtroom 201. Appeal No. 2008-1511, Therasense, et al. v. 

Becton Dickinson and Company, et al., will be argued at 

10 a.m. Appeal No. 2009-1374, Tivo, Inc. v. Echostar 

Corporation, et al., will be argued at 11 a.m. Counsel for 

each side for each appeal will be allowed 30 minutes to 

argue. Counsel for each party shall notify the clerk in 
3

writing by August 16, 2010, of the name of the attorney 

who will argue for that party. 

FOR THE COURT

June 3, 2010 

—————————— 

Date 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

—————————— 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

cc: Rohit Kumar Singla 

Rachel Krevans 

Bradford J. Badke 

Seth P. Waxman 

E. Joshua Rosenkranz 

All Amicus Curiae Counsel 

2008-1511, -1512, -1513,-1514,-1595 

2009-1374
Schedule of Director Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.28 
 SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ ANNUAL COMPENSATION 
 EFJ, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2007
AND 2008 
  

			
	 Board of Directors’ Quarterly Retainer
	  	$7,500
		
	 Audit Committee Quarterly Retainer
	  	$1,750
		
	 Audit Committee Chairperson Quarterly Retainer
	  	$1,250
		
	 Non-Audit Committee Quarterly Retainer
	  	$1,250
		
	 Non-Audit Committee Chairperson Quarterly Retainer
	  	$750
		
	 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan
	  	Each Eligible Non-Employee Director may elect to receive EFJ, Inc. common stock in lieu of cash board compensation, under the 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan. The amount
of common stock is determined upon the means the average of the closing price of a share of Common Stock during the last 10 trading days preceding the last business day of the Quarter.

 On March 7, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a new schedule of director fees.

 Each director shall receive an annual retainer of $42,000.00. In addition, the Chair of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Governance Committee shall receive as additional annual compensation, $7,000.00, $5,000.00 and $5,000.00, respectively.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                                  ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), Thomas E. Wharton Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of
iSECUREtrac Corp. (the "Company"), and David G. Vana, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that:

      1.    The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended
            December 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as
            Exhibit 32 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the
            end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of
            operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic
            Report.


Dated:  April 28, 2005


/s/   Thomas E. Wharton Jr.                    /s/   David G. Vana
---------------------------                    ----------------------------

       Thomas E. Wharton Jr.                          David G. Vana
       Chief Executive Officer                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the
Registrant

RAHX, Inc, a Nevada Corporation, and
a majority-owned subsidiary (1)

RRUN Labs Incorporated, a Delaware
Corporation, and a wholly owned subsidiary (2)

LIVESTAR Entertainment Canada, Inc. a
British Columbia Corporation, and a wholly-owned subsidiary (3)

LIVESTAR Entertainment
Establishments, Ltd. a Nevada Corporation, and a wholly-owned subsidiary (4)

---

(1)    
          RAHX, Inc. was incorporated in 2000 and was a majority-owned company of RRUN
          Ventures Inc., and therefore became a subsidiary of RRUN Ventures Network Inc.
          upon approval of the merger in August 2001.

(2)    
          RRUN Labs Incorporated was incorporated in September 2001.

(3)    
          LIVESTAR Entertainment Canada, Inc. was incorporated in June, 2002. Its former
          name was RVNI Management, Ltd. The name was changed in October 2003.

(4)    
          LIVESTAR Entertainment Establishments, Ltd. was incorporated in October 2003.
# C_2004263EN.01000701.xml

| 26.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3465 — SYNGENTA CP/ADVANTA)

(2004/C 263/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3465. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3465. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 473-12 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 5
---

Exhibit 4.18

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTdated for reference the 1st day of August, 2010 (the Amendment). BETWEEN:HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP., 
(the Company)AND:DONALD H. SEGAL,(the Executive)
  WHEREAS:A.
     the parties entered into an employment agreement dated for reference August 6, 2008, which was amended October 1st, 2009 (as so amended, the Employment Agreement);B.
     the parties wish to amend the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement, upon the terms set out in this Amendment;THEREFOREin consideration of the recitals, the following covenants and the payment of one dollar made by each party to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by each party, the parties agree on the following terms:1.
     The amendments set out in this Amendment are effective on and after August 1, 2010.2.
     All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except that where this Amendment may be in conflict with the provisions of the Employment Agreement, then this Amendment shall govern.3.
     Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:3.1 **Annual Base Salary**The Company shall pay or provide to the Executive, for his services under this Agreement, an annual salary of $415,000, payable semi-monthly on the fifteenth and the second last banking day of the month. Should the fifteenth day of any month not be a business day, the base salary otherwise due on such date shall be paid to the Executive on the immediately preceding business day.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.
  HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. Per:/s/ Gordon Lickrish
Authorized Signatory/s/ Donald H. SegalDONALD H. SEGAL


---
EXHIBIT 32.2

    Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Averox Inc. ("Averox") on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Mirza Yasser Ahmad, Chief Financial Officer of
Averox, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Averox.

Date: May 22, 2009

                                                         /s/ Mirza Yasser Ahmad
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Mirza Yasser Ahmad
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAY 23 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. JAMES DODSON VIEFHAUS, JR., also known as Thorsson,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-5076 (D.C. No. 97-CR-5-BU) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before PORFILIO, TACHA, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

James D. Viefhaus appeals the district court’s orde r denying his motion for revocation of a detention order entered by the magi strate judge. Our review of the district court’s ruling is plenary as to questi ons of law, giving due deference to the court’s factual findings. See United States v. Meyers , 95 F.3d 1475, 1488-89 (10th Cir. 1996). Our jurisdiction arises from 28 U.S.C. § 1291; see 19 U.S.C. § 3145(c). Defendant stands charged in the Northern District o f Oklahoma of 1) conspiracy to make a bomb threat and to possess a pipe bomb; 2) willfully making a bomb threat; and 3) possessing a nonregist ered destructive device, namely the components of a pipe bomb. After a hear ing, the magistrate judge ordered defendant detained, concluding that while h e was not a flight risk, he was a danger to the community and, further, that no con dition or combination of conditions would assure the community’s safety. Se e18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). Defendant moved to reopen the hearing, seeking revo cation of the detention order. After a hearing, the district court denied defendant’s motion, affirming the ruling of the magistrate judge. On appeal, defendant challenges the magistrate judg e’s factual finding that he is a danger to community, based on defendant’s s uppositions with regard to evidence obtained from a search of defendant’s resi dence. Defendant also contends that he should be released on bond because he has no previous criminal-3-

record and in light of his offered conditions of re lease. He points to the fact that a co-defendant was ordered released on bail under c ertain conditions. We have independently reviewed the record on appeal in light of the applicable law. We are convinced that the districtcourt’s factual findings were proper. Further, based on these findings, we agree with the district court that no condition or combination of conditions would reason ably assure the safety of the community. Accordingly, we conclude that the distr ict court’s detention order is proper. The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the Northern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT PER CURIAM
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-39 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           Kinematics of the Slumgullion landslide revealed by ground-based InSAR surveys      

      July 31, 2012    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

####               Landslide Hazards Programs          

12201 Sunrise Valley DrReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards
                  - United States
                  - Slumgullion landslide
                  - Colorado

View All **
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices 

# Order

August 22 , 2013

145631

- 2(112) (117)

_______________________________________

ANTHONY HENRY and KEITH WHITE

, Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

SC: 145631

v COA: 302373

Wayne CC: 10

- 000384

- CD

LABORERS LOCAL 1191, d/b/a ROAD

CONSTRUCTION LABORERS OF

MICHIGAN LOCAL 1191 and MICHAEL

AARON,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

BRUCE RUEDISUELI,

Defendant

.

_______________________________________

MICHAEL RAMSEY and GLENN DOWDY,

Plaintiffs

- Appell ees,

SC: 145632

v COA: 302710

Wayne CC: 10

- 004708

- CD

LABORERS LOCAL 1191, d/b/a ROAD

CONSTRUCTION LABORERS OF

MICHIGAN LOCAL 1191 and MICHAEL

AARON,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

BRUCE RUEDISUELI,

Defendant.

_______________________________________2

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 2 2 , 2013 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion s by defendants

- appellants to exten d the

time for filing their reply briefs a re GRANTED . The briefs received on August 2, 2013,

are accepted for filing. On further order, the motion s by defendants

- appellants for leave

to e nlarge the record are DENIED.

Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2240-2241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00410]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8586]

In the Matter of the Designation of Ansar al-Shari'a in Tunisia; 
Also Known as Al-Qayrawan Media Foundation; Also Known as Supporters of 
Islamic Law; Also Known as Ansar al-Sharia in Tunisia; Also Known as 
Ansar al-Shari'ah; Also Known as Ansar al-Shari'ah in Tunisia; Also 
Known as Ansar al-Sharia; as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant 
to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to 
find that the relevant circumstances described in

[[Page 2241]]

section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended 
(hereinafter ``INA'') (8 U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to Ansar al-
Shari'a in Tunisia, also known as Al-Qayrawan Media Foundation, also 
known as Supporters of Islamic Law, also known as Ansar al-Sharia in 
Tunisia, also known as Ansar al-Shari'ah, also known as Ansar al-
Shari'ah in Tunisia, also known as Ansar al-Sharia.
    Therefore, I hereby designate the aforementioned organization and 
its aliases as a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant to section 219 
of the INA.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

     Dated: December 31, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-00410 Filed 1-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  October 14, 2005

/s/ Thomas Cooke

Name: Thomas Cooke

Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  October 14, 2005

/s/ Thomas Cooke

Name: Thomas Cooke

Title:  Chief Financial Officer