alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Richard Rosenblatt, Chief Executive Officer, and Lisa Terrill, Chief Financial Officer, of Intermix Media, Inc. (the Company), certify
pursuant to section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2005, (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: June 28, 2005



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD M. ROSENBLATT                                               
|Richard M. Rosenblatt Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer)



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|/s/    LISA TERRILL                                               
|Lisa Terrill Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum  SuperYachts,  Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Ron  Ruskowsky,
President,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Ron Ruskowsky
Ron Ruskowsky,
President, CEO and Principal Executive and Accounting Officer


Dated: August 1, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S>     <C>

                                                                                             EXHIBIT 21.1

                                            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Name of Subsidiary                                                                 Place of Incorporation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Digital Learning Institute Inc.                                                    Delaware
Software Education of America, Inc. (1)                                            California
McKinley Educational Services, Inc. (1)                                            California
Digital Knowledge Works, Inc. (1)                                                  Delaware
Coursemate, Inc. (1)                                                               California
Changchun Yongxin Dirui Medical Co., Ltd. (2)                                      China
Jilin Province Yongxin Chain Drugstore Ltd. (3)                                    China
Jilin Dingjian Natural & Health Products Co., Ltd. (4)                             China
Tianjin Jingyongxin Chain Drugstore Ltd. (5)                                       China
Baishan Caoantang Chain Drugstore Ltd. (6)                                         China

   (1) Wholly-owned subsidiary of Digital Learning Institute, Inc.
   (2) 80%-owned subsidiary of Nutradyne Group, Inc.
   (3) Wholly-owned subsidiary of Changchun Yongxin Dirui Medical Co., Ltd.
   (4) 90%-owned subsidiary of Changchun Yongxin Dirui Medical Co., Ltd.
   (5) 90%-owned subsidiary of Jilin Province Yongxin Chain Drugstore Ltd.
   (6) Wholly-owned subsidiary of Jilin Province Yongxin Chain Drugstore Ltd.


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,033)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (23,596)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,858)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(b)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Holley Performance Products Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 28,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas W. Tomlinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Thomas W. Tomlinson                  
|-----------------------------------------
|Thomas W. Tomlinson                      
|Chief Financial Officer November 12, 2003



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Holley Performance Products Inc. and will be retained by Holley Performance Products Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated January 30, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on February 6, 2009 (74 FR 6309), Mallinckrodt Inc., 3600 
North Second Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63147, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in 
schedule II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phenylacetone (8501).......................   II
Coca Leaves (9040).........................   II
Opium, raw (9600)..........................   II
Poppy Straw (9650).........................   II
Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670).............   II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substances for 
the manufacture of controlled substances in bulk for distribution to 
its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of Mallinckrodt Inc. to import the basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest, and with 
United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated 
Mallinckrodt Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, 
the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9789 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sitestar Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Erhartic, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Frank Erhartic, Jr.

Frank Erhartic, Jr.,

President and Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

RALPH LEVI SANDERS, JR. CASE NO. 19-24331-PDR

CHAPTER 13

Debtor.

_______________________________/

MOTION TO COMPEL MODIFICATION OF PLAN 

Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC as servicing agent for The Bank of New York Mellon, 

f/k/a The Bank of New York, successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Trustee for 

Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2006-SD2, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-

SD2 (“Movant”) files its Motion to Compel Modification of Plan and states: 

1. Movant holds a valid note and mortgage on the property located at 561 SW 60 Ave., 

Plantation, FL 33317.

2. An Order Granting Debtor’s Verified Ex Parte Motion for Referral to Mortgage 

Modification Mediation (Doc. No. 59) was entered on March 18, 2020. 

3. The Third Amended Plan (Doc. No. 68) states, inter alia, that if the lender and 

debtor fail to reach a settlement, then within 14 calendar days after the mediator’s Final Report is 

filed, the Debtor will amend or modify the Plan to conform to Movant’s Proof of Claim without 

limiting the Debtor’s rights to take the appropriate action against the claim or treat Movant outside 

of the Plan. 

4. A Final Report of Loss Mitigation was filed on January 4, 2021 (Doc. No. 93) and 

a modified plan was not filed within 14 calendar days of that date. 

5. Accordingly, Movant seeks to compel the modification of the Confirmed Plan and 

require the Debtor to take the appropriate action with regard to Movant’s claim.

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 101 Filed 02/25/21 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, Movant respectfully requests the Court enter an order compelling the 

modification of the Confirmed Plan and granting such other relief that the Court may deem just 

and proper.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

Florida Bar Number 52899

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Movant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by regular mail 

and CM/ECF notice this 25

th day of February 2021. 

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

VIA REGULAR MAIL

Ralph Levi Sanders, Jr.

561 SW 60 Ave.

Plantation, FL 33317

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE

Robin R Weiner

POB 559007

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33355

U.S. Trustee

Office of the US Trustee 

51 S.W. 1st Ave. 

Suite 1204 

Miami, FL 33130

Case 19-24331-PDR Doc 101 Filed 02/25/21 Page 2 of 2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Mineral resource potential and geology of the Routt National Forest and the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho National Forest, Colorado, with a section on salable minerals      

      January 1, 2000    

View Plate

The assessment of the mineral resource potential of the Routt National Forest and the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho National Forest, Colorado, was conducted so that the mineral resources of the forest can be considered along with other resources in land use planning. This report discusses the potential for as yet undiscovered mineral and energy resources within the forest. Mineral resource information is given in terms of mineral deposit types and their geologic settings, and mineral deposit types are defined by geologic characteristics of known deposits that may occur within or near the forest. All available information regarding mineral deposits or occurrences and energy resources, as of June 1994, was assembled to assess the mineral and energy potential. Geologic maps were compiled and mineral and energy potential maps were also created for deposit types within the forest.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Steven M Smith

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

smsmith@usgs.gov

303-236-1192

## Related Content

#### Steven M Smith

##### Scientist Emeritus

Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center

smsmith@usgs.gov

303-236-1192

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Colorado
                  - Routt National Forest and the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho National Forest

View All **
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7221
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDWARD STARGEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-30, CA-00-211-5) Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 14, 2002 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Stargen, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Edward Stargen seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and for the reasons stated by the district court find that Stargen has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Stargen , Nos. CR-99-30; CA-00-211-5 (N.D.W. Va. July 15, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States. Part 3-B. Cumberland and Tennessee River basins      

      January 1, 1964    

View Document

View Plate

View Plate

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Cumberland and Tennessee River basins
                  - Alabama
                  -  Georgia
                  -  Kentucky
                  -  Mississippi
                  -  North Carolina
                  -  South Carolina
                  -  Tennessee
                  -  Virginia

View All **
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6676

WILLIAM H. ROGERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versusJOSEPH L. HAMILTON, Acting Secretary of Department of Correction, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-242-5-F) Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William H. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William H. Rogers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rogers v. Hamilton , No. CA-98-242-5-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Neil RIVERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender; Flor Diaz, Steven L. Seliger, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Roberts, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Rodger L. Johnson, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Knology, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knology,Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2006