alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 10, 2009, Penick Corporation, 33 Industrial Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
ScheduleCocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIDiphenoxylate (9170)
IIEcgonine (9180)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMorphine (9300)
II( print page 19598)Oripavine (9330)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances as bulk controlled substance intermediates for distribution to its customers for further manufacture or to manufacture pharmaceutical dosage forms. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than June 29, 2009. Dated: April 17, 2009. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E9-9803 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
VINCENT W.IIORRI(;AN 

County Executive 

Kevin Schlemmer 

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY 

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE 

Gerace Office Building- 3 N. Erie St.- Mayville, NY 14757-1007 

(716) 753-4211 -FAX (716) 753-4756- horriganv@co.chautaugua.ny.uswww .co.chautaugua.ny.us 

August 14.2014 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department ofTransportation 

Mr. Schlemmer: 

, .... ; 

., .. ,.J 

We are delighted to have Sun Air as our new EAS carrier at Jamestown, and look forward to working 

with the Sun Air team to build a strong passenger bases as soon as possible. Those we have spoken with 

in our community feel that returning to Pittsburgh as our hub airport will prove to be a much better link to 

both domestic and international destinations. The addition of a founh flight offered by Sun Air is a 

definite indication of the airline's commitment to provide much improved service. 

Throughout the process of the EAS bid procedure, David Hackett, president and CEO of Sun Air 

International made it clear to us that he was basing his marketing and financing plans on being able to 

secure a four year contact with the DOT. We strongly support that premise, as was evidenced by our 

letter of support for Sun Air previously sent to your office. We agreed with Mr. Hackett that a two year 

contract could have a detrimental effect on his marketing efforts, as we both felt more time was needed to 

overcome the negative feelings in our community towards our present EAS carrier. Even though his bid 

was presented in that light, we know the award was for a two-year period. 

What we don't know is whether there is any latitude within the rules of the DOR to extend his contract an 

additional two years. If it is possible, we definitely would support such a change. Not only would the 

additional time help Sun Air justify spending more time and money marketing and 11nancing the service. 

but it would provide our community with the stability that has been lacking. We are confident Pittsburgh 

will be a winner for us and we will do everything we can to grow community awareness, resulting in ever 

increasing passenger counts. 

Respectfully yours. 

(/AJAVincent W. Horrigan 

Chautauqua Count
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19595-19596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated December 22, 2008, and published in the Federal 
Register on December 31, 2008 (73 FR 80431), Norac Inc., 405 S. Motor 
Avenue, P.O. Box 577, Azusa, California 91702-3232, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370), a basic class 
of controlled substance listed in schedule I.
    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance in 
bulk for formulation into the pharmaceutical controlled substance 
Marinol[supreg] for sale to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Norac Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Norac Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above 
named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed.


[[Page 19596]]


    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9795 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Patrick D. Spangler, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Epocrates, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)*          **[Reserved]*

 

(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 12, 2011

 
|   | /s/   PATRICK D. SPANGLER       |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Patrick   D. Spangler           |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*       |
|   | *(Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
1

The Honorable Beverly Stites-Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3388

___________

Wayne Allen Bauer, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Joe Powell, Deputy Sheriff for Benton * Western District of Arkansas.

County, Arkansas, in his official and *

individual capacities, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 6, 2006

Filed: December 14, 2006

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Allen Bauer appeals from the district court’s1

 grant of summary

judgment in favor of Joe Powell in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Bauer claimed that

Powell, a patrol officer for Benton County, Arkansas, violated Bauer’s civil rights by

causing his probable cause hearing to be unreasonably delayed following his arrest.
-2-

Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d

517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002), we find the district court’s analysis to be correct, thorough,

and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 83 (Friday, May 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 20328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9678]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5280-N-16]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: May 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: April 23, 2009.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E9-9678 Filed 4-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Case 19-17561-RAM Doc 49 Filed 09/20/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-17561-RAM Doc 49 Filed 09/20/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-17561-RAM Doc 49 Filed 09/20/19 Page 3 of 3
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3058 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leathered footwear for men. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leathered 

footwear for men. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHERED FOOTWEAR FOR MEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3058 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Footwear for men, with uppers of leather other than of 

pigskin (other than house 

slippers, work footwear, tennis shoes, basketball shoes, 

gym shoes, training shoes, 

and the like, and other than 

slip-on footwear), valued $27/ 

pair or higher, designed to be 

worn in lieu of, but not over, 

other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease 

or chemicals or cold or inclement weather where such 

protection includes protection 

against water that is imparted by the use of a coated 

or laminated textile fabric 

(provided for in subheading 

6403.99.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**§
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SulphCo, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Larry D.
      Ryan, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
      and
      Stanley W. Farmer, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, each hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Larry D. RyanName:
            Larry
                D. RyanTitle:
            Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
            August
                1, 2008/s/
                Stanley W. FarmerName:
            Stanley
                W. FarmerTitle:
            Vice
                President andChief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            August
                1, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0393 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0393

**Council Regulation (EC) No 393/2004 of 24 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre **

*
Official Journal L 065 , 03/03/2004 P. 0004 - 0004 *

Council Regulation (EC) No 393/2004

of 24 February 2004

amending Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 37(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee(2),

After consulting the opinion of the Committee of the Regions,

Whereas:

(1) The second subparagraph of Article 2(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000(3) lays down that the Member States may derogate from the limit of 7,5 % impurities and shives and grant processing aid for short flax fibre containing a percentage of impurities and shives of between 7,5 % and 15 % and for hemp fibre containing a percentage of impurities and shives of between 7,5, % and 25 %. However, advantage may be taken of this possibility only until the 2003/04 marketing year.

(2) At the present time, the percentage of impurities and shives in most short flax fibre and hemp fibre obtained during primary processing exceeds the limit of 7,5 %. In order to consolidate the positive development the sector is experiencing and to allow for further improvements in competitiveness, the possibility of Member States to derogate from that limit should be extended for two marketing years.

(3) Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the second subparagraph of Article 2(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000, "2001/2002 to 2003/2004" is replaced by "2001/02 to 2005/06".

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2004.

For the Council

The President

J. Walsh

(1) Opinion delivered on 10 February 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2) Opinion delivered on 21 January 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).
Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 472-17 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 1
Order entered October 15, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00703-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

ASHLEY BETH GAMMILL, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA12-49137

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellee’s October 11, 2013 second motion for extension of time to 

file appellee’s brief.

We ORDER appellee to file the brief within FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from the date of this 

order. If appellee’s brief is not filed within the specified time, we will submit the appeal without 

appellee’s brief.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.9.A


Amendment

to


The AES Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan


 


Pursuant to the authority granted to the undersigned by the Board of
Directors of The AES Corporation, The AES Corporation Supplemental Retirement
Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended by adding the following provision to the
end of Section 1 of the Plan:


 


Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary contained herein and with respect to deferred compensation
benefits that were earned and vested under this Plan prior to January 1,
2005 (as determined under Section 409A, “Grandfathered Benefits”), such
Grandfathered Benefits shall be governed and administered by the terms of the
Plan as in effect on December 31, 2004. 
No amendment or other modification shall be made to the Plan, and no amendment
or modification to the Plan shall be interpreted or construed in a manner, that
would cause the
Plan or benefits payable thereunder to become subject to Section 409A.  The Plan shall be administered and
interpreted in a manner intended to ensure that the benefits payable thereunder
remain exempt from Section 409A. 
Notwithstanding, in no event shall any member of the Board or the
Company (or its employees, officers or directors) have any liability to any
Participant (or any other person) for any taxes imposed under Section 409A
on any benefits provided under the Plan.  For purposes
of the Plan, “Section 409A” shall mean Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the regulations and other binding guidance
promulgated thereunder.


 


This amendment has been
duly executed by the undersigned and is effective this 13th day of March 2008.


 


 


	
   

  	
  The AES Corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Jay L. Kloosterboer, Executive
  Vice

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President,
  Business Excellence
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY**

**ACT OF 2002**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the quarterly report of Epocrates, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Rosemary A. Crane, the Chief Executive Officer and Patrick D. Spangler, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 12, 2011

 
|     | /s/   ROSEMARY A. CRANE     |
|----------|-----------------------------|
|     | Name:   Rosemary A. Crane   |
| * * | *Chief Executive Officer*   |
| * * | * *                    |
| * * | * *                    |
|     | /s/   PATRICK D. SPANGLER   |
|     | Name:   Patrick D. Spangler |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer*   |

 

----