alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

d1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

146934(42)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146934

COA: 307736

Wayne CC: 11

- 007505

- FC

DOUGLAS ALBERT REESE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2013

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
# W5-/S ELECTRONIC RECORD COA # 10-14-00207-CR 

## STYLE: DavidRaySneed v.The Stat TRIAL COURT: 52nd Distric TRIAL COURTS: Fam 13-216e ofTexas :t Court 34

. Farrell 

## OFFENSE: Aggravated Assault 

## COUNTY: Coryell MOTION FOR REHEARING IS: TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Hon. Trent D DATE: DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED JUDGE: 

### DATE: May 7, 2015 

### JUSTICE: Scoggins PC S YES PUBLISH: DNP: YES 

### CLK RECORD: 8/19/2014 SUPPCLKRECORD: 

### RPTRECORD: 9/25/2015 SUPPRPTRECORD: 

### STATE BR: 3/10/2015 SUPP BR: 

### APP BR: 1/12/2015 PROSE BR:



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# CCA# faMGWt& APPBLLANOS Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: 

### DATE: /Ofay (XDif 

# JUDGE: P.tA Ijsu^Ji**- SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS: CCA IS: ON JUDGE: ON JUDGE:
!		

"	
#$		%
"		
#&$"&' (()* +

,	-		,	 $	
.


/
	$, '&&/& 0& )%& Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
 	

	


		
	 
	
!		

"	
#$		%
"		
#&$"&' (()* 

+,-./0123./405

67897833./405

+:206;<0=

>2:20

.?

@:?27A012

7A012+:206;<0=

+02:;<4B712;2B3:/0 C
	$D		$D		
	



&' (()E(#% %)E%FDD

6;<;1G81H,5/:2;,1

DIJIKIK

&

LIJ

CD

)%'

M( %)%E%

I

N5;1-;O:<P==50??

QQCD)(D  '

%Q

R%M)DES)TFCDLLJI

U:;<;1GP==50??

QQCD)(D  '

%Q

R%M)DES)TFCDLLJI

V0G;?2050=PG0123:/0WP==50??

XFRDD)ED

QQCD)(D  '

%Q

R%M)DES)TFCDLLJI

P.2Y,5;Z0=N05?,1[?\+02:;<

3:/0WP==50??

%	
E( E XFRDD)ED

QQCD)(D  ']Q

R%M)DES)TFCDLLJI

P11.:<V0O,52?

3,P11.:<V0O,52?6;<0=

+,-./0128/:G0?

LIJ^^C
	$D		$D		
	
 '	_		MC`

abcdefghijgdklimkcnokgkipheqerecmcnscdjcdgkecmr

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 475-10 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
Amendment to Index License Agreement for Funds, dated as of October 27, 2009



 Exhibit 10.15 
 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT GRANTED. *********** INDICATES OMITTED MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN GRANTED CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE COMMISSION. THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.

 AMENDMENT 

Date of Amendment: October 27, 2009 
 AMENDMENT to the Index License Agreement for Funds (the “Agreement”), dated as of March 18, 2000, by and between MSCI Inc. (f/k/a/ Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc.)
(“MSCI”) and Barclays Global Investors, N.A. (“Licensee”), as previously amended. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed in the Agreement. 

 

	1.	Exhibit A of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, MSCI All Country World
Minimum Volatility Index and MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. 

 For the avoidance of doubt, the license fees
set forth in the Agreement, as amended, shall apply with respect to all Funds based on the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index, MSCI All Country World Minimum Volatility Index and MSCI USA Minimum
Volatility Index. 
  

	 	•	 	 The *********** per Fund. The *********** per Fund. 


  


	2.	This Amendment is intended to amend and operate in conjunction with the Agreement and together this Amendment and the Agreement constitute the complete and exclusive
statement of the agreement between the parties and supersede in full all prior proposals and understandings, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof. To the extent that any terms of this Amendment conflict with any terms of the
Agreement, the terms of this Amendment will control. No right or license of any kind is granted to Licensee except as expressly provided in the Agreement or this Amendment. 


 

	3.	This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York without regard to its conflict or choice of laws principles.


  

									
	LICENSEE: Barclays Global Investors	 		 	MSCI Inc.
					
	By	 	   /s/ Greg Friedman
	 		 	By	 	   /s/ Paul Friedman

					
	Name	 	   Greg Friedman
	 		 	Name	 	   Paul Friedman

		 	  (printed)	 		 		 	  (printed)
					
	Title	 	   Managing Director
	 		 	Title	 	   Vice President

				
	LICENSEE: Barclays Global Investors	 		 		 	
					
	By	 	   /s/ Elaine Orr
	 		 		 	
					
	Name	 	   Elaine Orr
	 		 		 	
		 	  (printed)	 		 		 	
					
	Title	 	   Principal
Exhibit 10.6


 




 


 


 


March 13, 2008


 


Mark Ianni


 


Dear Mark:


 


The 2008 bonus plan reflects the goals for our company this coming year.  Your bonus is based on Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Income Tax Depreciation Amortization).


 





	
            15%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $  7,300,000
 
	
            22.5%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $  8,300,000
 
	
            30%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $  9,300,000
 
	
            37.5%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $10,400,000
 
	
            50%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $11,500,000
 
	
            62.5%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $12,500,000
 
	
            75%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $13,500,000
 
	
            87.5%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $14,500,000
 





 


In addition, you will earn 12.5% of your cumulative salary if, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee, you meet the goals outlined in the document provided to you separately.


 


A quarterly update will be sent in conjunction with our earnings announcement to update you on the performance of the company versus the bonus plan.


 


The 2008 bonus period covers the fiscal months of February 2008 through January 2009.  You must be an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time the bonus is paid to be eligible to receive your bonus.


 


We are excited about the challenges and prospects in the coming year.  We hope it is a good year for all of our shareholders and us.


 





	
             
 	
            Sincerely,
 





 





	
             
 	
            /s/ Peter Edison
 





 





	
             
 	
            Peter Edison
 





 


ss


 


2815 Scott Avenue • Saint Louis, Missouri 63103 • (314) 621-0699 • Fax (314) 621-0708
# The Attorney General of Texas
October 16, 1978 JOHN L. HILL Attorney General
Honorable Fred P. Holub Matagorda County Attorney P. 0. Box1527 Bay City, Texas 77414 Opinion No. I-I-1258 Re: Whether a rubber stamp may be used by a district clerk ashis official seal. Dear Mr.Holub: You have requested our opinion regarding whether a rubber stamp engraved as directed byarticle 1905,V.T.C.S., may beused by a district clerk ashis official seal to validate his acts ofoffice. A very similar question was posed in Attorney General Opinion M-853 (1971). That opinion decided that a notary public may use a rubber stamp engraved asdirected byarticle 5960,V.T.C.S. That opinion stated:

The specific directive of such statute is in regard to the text and form of a particular device or design to be enived on the instrument
... as a seal of office. Nothing in this statute
... requires the use of any particular material in the construction of any seal, notarial or otherwise. (Emphasis in original). Article 5960, the statute that describes the seal of notaries public, is substantially similar in wording and form to article 1905, the statute that describes the seal of district clerks. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the use ofarubber stamp engraved as described in article 1905by a district clerk to authenticate his acts of office is permissible and sufficient in law to constitute the use ofhis official seal. Caution should be taken. however. to insure the durability and clarity of the impression. See Stooksberry v. Swan, 21S.W.694(Tex. Civ. Ape.), affirmed, 22S.W. 963(1893). SUMMARY A district clerk may use a properly engraved rubber stamp ashis official seal of office.

p. 4988Honorable Fred P. Holub - Page 2 (H-1258)

/ Attorney General ofTexas APPROVED: /

Opinion Committee jm

p. 498,9
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB of FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerald W. Quealy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 01, 2005


/s/ GERALD W. QUEALY
__________________________________
    Gerald W. Quealy
    Treasurer and Chief
    Financial Officer and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY  FLICKERING  STAR  FINANCIAL,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Optio Software, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Wayne Cape, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 14, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ C. Wayne Cape      
|                         |  |     |  | C. Wayne Cape          
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of United American Corporation for                the                quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of United American                Corporation. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: | /s/                Simon Lamarche                                                                        |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Simon                Lamarche                                                                      |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  August                14, 2006                                                                     |
Exhibit 23

                       [MOORES ROWLAND MAZARS LETTERHEAD]


October 15, 2004

The Directors
Intermost Corporation
10th Floor, B10-07 Guomao Building
Renmin Rd. (South)
Shenzhen
China 518014

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of our report
dated September 25, 2003 on our audit of the financial statements of Intermost
Corporation and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004 and for the year then
ended.

Yours faithfully

/s/ Moores Rowland Mazars
Moores Rowland Mazars
Chartered Accountants
Certified Public Accountants
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS BENOIT, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting 

Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-70179 

Agency No. A200-202-065 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 17, 2021**

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Thomas Benoit, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and 

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-70179 

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. 

Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the 

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Benoit failed 

to establish the harm he experienced or fears in Haiti was or would be on account 

of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) 

(an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft 

or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). 

Thus, Benoit’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Benoit failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the 

consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Haiti. See Wakkary v. 

Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009) (no likelihood of torture).

As stated in the court’s March 27, 2017 order, the temporary stay of removal 

remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TX MEDICAL OFFICE, LP,

FL MEDICAL OFFICE, LLC,

CA MEDICAL OFFICE, LP, AND

MOB PORTFOLIO ASSOCIATES, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

TENET HEALTH SYSTEM

HOSPITALS, INC.

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00263

- CV

Appeal from

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2010

- 1628)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the j oint motion to dis pose of the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted

, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We

therefore vacate the trial court’s judgment, dismiss the case, and render judgment effectuating

the parties’ se ttlement agreement in that all claims, counterclaims, or causes of action as to the

“Alvarado Medical Plaza II” site are dismissed without prejudice and all remaining claims,

counterclaims, or causes of action are dismissed with prejudice. We further orde r costs be

assessed against the party incurring same. We further order that this decision be certified below

for observance.IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chi ef Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 77 (Thursday, April 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9316]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 15, 2009, the Department of Education published a 
comment period notice in the Federal Register (Page 17459, Column 1) 
for the information collection, ``Documents Associated with the Notice 
of Terms and Conditions of Additional Purchase of Loans under the 
``Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008''. This notice 
amends the total annual responses to 8,395. The IC Clearance Official, 
Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, 
hereby issues a correction notice as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995.

    Dated: April 20, 2009.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, 
Office of Management.
[FR Doc. E9-9316 Filed 4-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
---

EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended July 31, 2009, the undersigned Garth Wong, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





September 9, 2009








/s/Garth Wong


Garth Wong, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Michael J. Marx, the Chief Financial Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-K of Nano Mask for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.   /s/ Michael J. Marx Michael J. Marx Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  December 29, 2011
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Essential Group, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-68038) of our report dated March 1, 2005 on Essential Group, Inc. (formerly AmericasDoctor, Inc.), relating to the consolidated financial statements of Essential Group, Inc. and subsidiary as of December31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Essential Group, Inc. 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 30, 2005