alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Cutter Enterprises, LLC ) ASBCA No. 62766

)

Under Contract No. W912LD-15-C-0002 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Peter J. Martin, Esq.

 Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP

 Hartford, CT

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

Harry M. Parent III, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 21, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62766, Appeal of Cutter Enterprises, 

LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 21, 2021 

JOHN J. TRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Methods and applications of digital-model simulation of the Red River alluvial aquifer: Shreveport to the mouth of the Black River, Louisiana      

      January 1, 1980    

View Document

The Red River Waterways Project provides for the construction of five locks and dams on the Red River from the Mississippi River to Shreveport, La. The methodology used by the U.S. Geological Survey in studying the effects of the navigation pools on the ground-water-flow regime involved digital modeling of steady- and nonsteady-state conditions. The steady-state model, GWFLOW, computes the head response in an aquifer due to various boundary conditions. The nonsteady-state model, SUPERMOCK, was designed to simulate transient stress and response in an alluvial-flow system. In addition to the simulation models several computer programs were developed during the study to aid in the preparation of field data for input to the models and in the calibration of the models. Calibration techniques unique to each of the models were developed for the investigation. (USGS)

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - black river
                  - Louisiana

View All **
EXHIBIT 10.5

 

[Insert Company letterhead.]

 

October 14, 2011

 

Subject:                                                     Side Letter Agreement to the Compensation Agreement between Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) and Joseph N. Forkey (the “Employee”), dated December 3, 2010

 

Dear Mr. Forkey,

 

This Side Letter Agreement entered into on October 14, 2011 between the Company and the Employee will serve to modify the Compensation Agreement entered into on December 3, 2010 (the “Compensation Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein which are not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as those given to them in the Compensation Agreement.

 

WHEREAS, the Company agreed to issue the Shares within six months of the date of the Compensation Agreement and the deadline has subsequently passed;

 

WHEREAS, the Company plans to register a Registration Statement on Form S-8 prior to November 12, 2011;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and undertakings set forth herein, and intending to be fully bound hereby, the parties agree to modify the Compensation Agreement in the following respects:

 

1.               Section 2 shall be replaced with the following language:

 

The Shares will be issued as registered common stock from the “2011 Deferred Compensation Plan” within 5 business days following the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

2.               The vesting schedule of the Shares as described in Section 3 shall remain unmodified.

 

Except as specifically set forth in this Side Letter Agreement, all other terms, rights or provisions of the Compensation Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.

 

 

	
AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
EMPLOYEE
    	
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Joseph N. Forkey
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Jack Dreimiller
    
	
Name:
    	
Joseph N. Forkey
    	
Name:
    	
Jack Dreimiller
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief Financial Officer
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

25266

Vol. 60, No. 91

Thursday, May 11, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on

Electron Devices

Correction

In notice document 95–11024

appearing on page 22053 in the issue of

Thursday, May 4, 1995, in the first

column, the document heading should

read as set forth above.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

THE PRESIDENT

3 CFR

Proclamation 6778 of March 17, 1995

To Amend the Generalized System of

Preferences

Correction

In Proclamation 6778 appearing on

page 15455 in the issue of Thursday,

March 23, 1995, in the heading, the

Proclamation number ‘‘6788’’ should

read ‘‘6778’’.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-35655; File No. SR-DTC95-05]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The

Depository Trust Company; Order

Extending Temporary Approval of a

Proposed Rule Change Expanding the

Money Market Instrument Settlement

Program

Correction

In notice document 95–11130

beginning on page 22423 in the issue of

Friday, May 5, 1995, make the following

correction:

On page 22425, in the second column,

before the FR document line, the

signature line was omitted and should

have appeared as follows:

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Rel. No. IC-21035; File No. 812-9276]

Connecticut General Life Insurance

Company, et al.

Correction

In notice document 95–11131

beginning on page 22421 in the issue of

Friday, May 5, 1995, make the following

correction:

On page 22423, in the third column,

before the FR document line, the

signature line was omitted and should

have appeared as follows:

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 FILE COPY

12/1/2015 

### BOSWELL, MICKEY 

### Tr. 'GfcWo.p^CR-4228-G 

## The Appellant's Petition for Discretionar^Review has this day been filed. [The 

## Courtrequires ten copies ofthis^odument^fojjbefiled in this officewithin three (3) COA No. 13-11 -00786-CR PD-1555-15 

### days pursuantto Rule 9.3(b). Failure tdisend copies will result inthe refusal of the petition.] Abel Acosta, Clerk 13TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK DORIAN RAMIREZ 901 LEOPARD CORPUS CHRISTI.TX 78401 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Dewey Wayne HAMM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0275

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Order entered June 25 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 01436

- CR

LEE JAROME LEWIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14

- 52807

- X



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.
On May 21, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s

brief ha d not been filed. On June 22, 2015, we received appellant’s brief, together with an

extension mo tion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the May 21,
2015 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the June 22, 2015 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as

of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.119

 

ADOPTION OF FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE

ASSURED GUARANTY LTD. SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Assured Guaranty Ltd. (the “Company”) authorized the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company (and certain other officers of the Company) to adopt the Fourth Amendment to the Assured Guaranty Ltd. Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (the “Fourth Amendment”).

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, Dominic Frederico, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby adopts the Fourth Amendment in the form attached hereto, to be effective January 6, 2012.

 

	
/s/   Dominic Frederico
    	
 
    
	
Dominic Frederico
    
	
President and Chief Executive Officer of Assured   Guaranty Ltd.
    
	
 
    
	
Date: January 5, 2012
    


 

1











 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE

ASSURED GUARANTY LTD. SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN

(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2009)

 

WHEREAS, Assured Guaranty Ltd. (the “Company”) maintains the Assured Guaranty Ltd. Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective January 6, 2012, by adding the following as a new Exhibit C to the Plan:

 

“Exhibit C

 

ASSURED GUARANTY LTD. SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN

 

Account Balances Transferred From the Assured Guaranty Ltd. Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan to the Assured Guaranty Corp. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

 

Effective January 6, 2012, the Company shall transfer the Account balances of Participants in the Plan who are US Taxpayers to the extent such Accounts are invested in a Investment Return Rate alternative other than Units in the Employer Stock Fund (such transferred account balances referred to herein as the “Transferred Accounts”) from the Plan to the Assured Guaranty Corp. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “AGC Plan”).  The Transferred Accounts shall be subject to the terms of the AGC Plan, including, but not limited to, Exhibit B of the AGC Plan.  The transfer shall not include that portion of any Account invested in Units in the Employer Stock Fund.”

 

2
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Land conversion and pesticide use degrade forage areas for honey bees in America’s beekeeping epicenter      

      May 13, 2021    

A diverse range of threats have been associated with managed bee declines globally. Recent increases of two known threats, land-use change and pesticide use, have resulted from agricultural expansion and intensification notably in the top honey producing state in the United States (U.S.): North Dakota. This study investigated the dual threat from land conversion and pesticide use surrounding ~14,000 registered apiaries in North Dakota from 2001 to 2014. We estimated the annual total insecticide use (kg) on major crops within 1.6 km of apiary sites. Of the eight insecticides, six showed significant increasing trends over the time period. Specifically, applications of the newly established neonicotinoids Chlothianidin, Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam, increased annually by 1329 kg, 686 kg, 795 kg, respectively. Also, the use of Chlorpyrifos, which was well-established by 2001 and is highly toxic to honey bees, increased by ~8,800 kg annually from 6,500 kg in 2001 to 115,000 kg in 2014 on corn, soybeans and wheat. We further evaluated the relative quality changes of natural/semi-natural land covers surrounding apiaries in 2006, 2010 and 2014, a period of significant increases in cropland area. In areas surrounding apiaries, we observed changes in multiple indices of forage quality that reflect the deteriorating landscape surrounding registered apiary sites due to land-use change and pesticide-use increases. Overall, our results suggest that the application of foliar-applied insecticides, including pyrethroids and one organophosphate, increased surrounding apiaries when the use of neonicotinoid seed treatment surged and the area for producing corn and soybeans expanded. Spatially, these threats were most pronounced in southeastern North Dakota, a region hosting a high density of apiary sites that has recently experienced corn and soybean expansion. Our results highlight the values of natural and semi-natural land covers as sources of pollinator forage and providing refugia for bees against pesticide exposure. Our study provides insights for targeting conservation efforts to improve forage quality for benefiting managed pollinators.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Clint Otto, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

cotto@usgs.gov

701-368-9028

## Related Content

#### Clint Otto, PhD

##### Research Ecologist

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

cotto@usgs.gov

701-368-9028

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Dakota

View All **
Andre ZOLDAN, Appellant, v. The ENTRADA CONDOMINIUM, INC., Ingrid E. Watkins, PA, Ingrid E. Watkins, Adah Gaines, Elizabeth Watkins, and Nexstar Title and Escrow, LLC, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3853

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 14, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4713 

To amend the market name of genetically altered salmon in the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2016 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. DEFAZIO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the market name of genetically altered salmon 

in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Genetically Engineered 

5 Salmon Labeling Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSES. 

7 It is the purpose of this Act to— 

8 (1) ensure that consumers in the United States 

9 can make informed decisions when purchasing salm10 on; and 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4713 IH

1 (2) authorize an independent scientific review 

2 of— 

3 (A) the possible effects of genetically engi4 neered salmon on wild salmon stocks; and 

5 (B) the Food and Drug Administration’s 

6 approval of genetically engineered salmon for 

7 human consumption. 

8 SEC. 3. MARKET NAME FOR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED 

9 SALMON. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi11 sion of law, for purposes of applying the Federal Food, 

12 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), the ac13 ceptable market name of any salmon that is genetically 

14 engineered shall include the words ‘‘Genetically Engi15 neered’’ or ‘‘GE’’ prior to the existing acceptable market 

16 name. 

17 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, salm18 on is genetically engineered if it has been modified by re19 combinant DNA (rDNA) techniques, including the entire 

20 lineage of salmon that contain the rDNA modification. 

21 SEC. 4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW OF CERTAIN SALMON AP22 PROVAL. 

23 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

24 ensure that an independent scientific organization con25 ducts a review of the environmental assessment that was 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4713 IH

1 carried out by the Food and Drug Administration in sup2 port of an approval of a new animal drug application re3 lated to AquAdvantage Salmon, dated November 12, 

4 2015. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**BMVIT - IV/L** **1 (Strategie**  **und Internationales)** 

# • **Postanschrift Postfach**  **201, 1000**  **Wien Büroanschrift**  **Radetzkystraße 2**  **, 1** **030 Wien**  **E-Mail: 11@bmvit.gv.at**  **Internet: www** **.bmvit.gv.at (Antwort**  **bitte unter** **Anführung der**  **GZ.**
**an die**  **oben angeführte**  **E-Mail-Adresse) GZ.**  **BMVIT-40.005/0002-IV/L 1/2014**  **DVR:0000175**

**Paul Gretch**  **Director, Office**  **of International**  **Aviation Office**  **of the**  **Assistant Secretary**  **for Aviation**  **and International** **Affairs U.S.**  **Department of**  **Transportation 400**  **7th Strett,**  **S.W. Room**  **6402 Washington,**  **DC 20590** 

**Dear Mr.**  **Gretch, Bund�smm1s!�rwm**  **furV�rk�h� lnnovatton** **und Technologie** 

**Wien, 19.**  **February 2014** 

**With reference**  **to the**  **intentions of** **the Austri** **an designated**  **carier Global**  **Jet Austria**  **GmbH (Note**  **Verbal of**  **the Embassy**  **of Ausria**  **dated 13th**  **of November 2006) according**  **to the**  **provisions of**  **the bilateral**  **air services agreement**  **(Air Services**  **Agreement between the**  **Austrian Federal**  **Government and**  **the Government**  **of the**  **United States**  **of America,**  **done at**  **Vienna an**  **16th of**  **March 1989,**  **as amended)**  **to conduct**  **on-scheduled (** **charter) air**  **services to/from**  **the United**  **States based**  **an fifth,**  **sixth or**  **seventh freedom**  **traffic rights**  **and referring**  **to the**  **designation of**  **the said**  **airline the**  **Austrian Civil**  **Aviation Authority**  **hereby confirms**  **that similar**  **requests submitted**  **by the**  **U.S. carrie** **rs will**  **be treated**  **an the**  **basis of**  **reciprocity.**

**Sincerely Yours** 

# ;J!o **Silvia Gehre** **li Director,**  **Air ransport**  **Affairs Federal**  **Ministry of** **Transport, Innovation**  **and Technology**  **Civil Aviation**  **Authority**
EXHIBIT 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Pengrowth Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher G. Webster, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated February 28, 2012



/s/ Christopher G. Webster
Name: Christopher G. WebsterTitle: Chief Financial Officer
# L_2004186EN.01000401.xml

| 25.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 186/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 186/4

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1012/2004

of 24 May 2004

applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 of 13 July 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (2), and in particular Article 8(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches EUR 1 114 381 959 while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates for use from 1 June 2004 as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is EUR 48 924 335. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Member States' notifications pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 indicate that the total amount of applications received reaches EUR 1 114 381 959 while the available amount for the tranche of refund certificates for use from 1 June 2004 as referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 is EUR 48 924 335.

| (2) | A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 June 2004 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A reduction coefficient shall be calculated on the basis of Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000. Such coefficient should therefore be applied to amounts requested in the form of refund certificates for use from 1 June 2004 as established in Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amounts for applications of refund certificates for use from 1 June 2004 are subject to a reduction coefficient of 0,957.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 May 2004.

For the Commission

Erkki LIIKANEN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 20.12.1993, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2580/2000 (OJ L 298, 25.11.2000, p. 5).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

2

---