alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3231 

To provide for the issuance and sale of a semipostal by the United States 

Postal Service to support effective programs targeted at improving permanency outcomes for youth in foster care. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2012 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. 

WYDEN, and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance and sale of a semipostal by 

the United States Postal Service to support effective 

programs targeted at improving permanency outcomes 

for youth in foster care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Families for Foster 

5 Youth Stamp Act of 2012’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3231 IS

1 SEC. 2. FAMILIES FOR FOSTER YOUTH SEMIPOSTAL. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to increase funding for 

3 effective programs targeted at improving permanency out4 comes for youth in foster care, the United States Postal 

5 Service shall, for a period of not less than 4 years, provide 

6 for the issuance and sale of a semipostal, in accordance 

7 with section 416 of title 39, United States Code. 

8 (b) DISPOSITION OF AMOUNTS.— 

9 (1) ADOPTION OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAM.— 

10 Fifty percent of any amounts becoming available 

11 from the sale of the semipostal under this Act shall 

12 be transferred to the Secretary of Health and 

13 Human Services for programs and activities author14 ized under section 203 of the Child Abuse Preven15 tion and Treatment and Adoption Reform Act of 

16 1978 (42 U.S.C. 5113) that specifically target im17 provement in permanency outcomes for youth in fos18 ter care through adoption, guardianship, or kinship 

19 care. 

20 (2) STATE COURT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.— 

21 Fifty percent of any amounts becoming available 

22 from the sale of the semipostal under this Act shall 

23 be transferred to the Secretary of Health and 

24 Human Services for programs and activities author25 ized under section 438 of the Social Security Act 

26 (42 U.S.C. 629h). 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3231 IS

1 (c) DEFINITION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘semipostal’’ 

2 has the meaning given that term in section 416 of title 

3 39, United States Code. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1 - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

                         Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Balance at
                                                Beginning of     Charged to Income or    Increase in    Balance at End of
                                                   Period              Expenses           Allowance           Period
                                                   ------              --------           ---------           ------
<S>                                                    <C>                    <C>            <C>                   <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1999:
 Provisions for doubtful accounts                 $125,000             $606,932             $157,056          $574,876
                                                  ========           ==========           ==========          ========

For the year ended December 31, 2000:
 Provisions for doubtful accounts                 $574,876           $1,834,197           $1,670,167          $738,906
                                                  ========           ==========           ==========          ========

For the year ended December 31, 2001:
 Provisions for doubtful accounts                 $738,906             $(14,079)            $578,374          $146,453
                                                  ========           ==========           ==========          ========
</TABLE>


                   Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Asset


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Balance at
                                                Beginning of     Charged to Income or    Increase in    Balance at End of
                                                   Period              Expenses           Allowance           Period
                                                   ------              --------           ---------           ------
<S>                                                    <C>                    <C>            <C>                   <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1999:
 Provisions for deferred taxes                     $837,489              $-0-            $8,476,488         $9,313,977
                                                ===========              ====           ===========        ===========

For the year ended December 31, 2000:
 Provisions for deferred taxes                   $9,313,977              $-0-           $11,100,880        $20,414,857
                                                ===========              ====           ===========        ===========

For the year ended December 31, 2001:
 Provisions for deferred taxes                  $20,414,857              $-0-            $4,463,186        $24,878,043
                                                ===========              ====           ===========        ===========
</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Methods for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in the southwestern United States      

      January 1, 1997    

View Document

Methods were developed for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods at gaged and ungaged sites in the Southwestern United States. Estimating equations for ungaged sites were developed by transferring information from gaged to ungaged sites using multiple regression and a hybrid method developed during this study. The methods and analysis are described, and information from more than 1,300 gaged sites is tabulated.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Arizona
                  -  California
                  -  Colorado
                  -  Idaho
                  -  Nevada
                  -  New Mexico
                  -  Oregon
                  -  Texas
                  -  Utah
                  -  Wyoming

View All **
**Exhibit Number  21**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF GREAT WESTERN BANCORPORATION, INC.**

 
| **Name**                          |   | **State of  Incorporation**                                                 |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   |                                                                        |
| Great Western Bank, Omaha         |   | Nebraska                                                                    |
|                              |   |                                                                        |
| Great Western Bank, Watertown     |   | South Dakota                                                                |
|                              |   |                                                                        |
| Great Western Bank, Clive         |   | Iowa                                                                        |
|                              |   |                                                                        |
| Great Western Service Corporation |   | South Dakota                                                                |
|                              |   |                                                                        |
| GWB Capital Trust I               |   | A statutory business trust organized  under the Delaware Business Trust Act |
|                              |   |                                                                        |
| GWB Capital Trust II              |   | A statutory business trust organized  under the Delaware Business Trust Act |
|                              |   |                                                                        |
| GWB Capital Trust III             |   | A statutory business trust organized  under the Delaware Business Trust Act |

 

1

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40282

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIA MITCHELL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-101-15

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Mia Mitchell has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Mitchell has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40282 Document: 00514786072 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2019
No. 18-40282

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40282 Document: 00514786072 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2019
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sitestar Corporation, (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Frank Erhartic,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Daniel Judd,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify to our knowledge
and in our capacity as officers of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate.





/s/ Frank Erhartic, Jr.
                
                /s/ Daniel JuddFrank
      Erhartic, Jr.
                
                Daniel
      JuddChief
      Executive Officer and President
                
                Chief
      Financial OfficerOctober
      8, 2009
                
                October
      8, 2009
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Make your own paper fossils; a computer animation and paper models      

      January 1, 1994    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Scott Starratt, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

sstarrat@usgs.gov

650-329-4990

## Related Content

#### Scott Starratt, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

sstarrat@usgs.gov

650-329-4990

### Contacts

#### Scott Starratt, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Geology, Minerals, Energy, and Geophysics Science Center

sstarrat@usgs.gov

650-329-4990
UNITED STAT ES COURT OF AP P EALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

N O
. 00-814
G I L DA E. L EV I , A PP EL L ANT ,
V
. ANTHONY J. P RI NCI PI , S EC RE T A RY O F V ET ER A N S A FF A I RS , A PPEL L EE
.

Be fore FARL EY, I VERS, and STEI NB ERG, J

ud ge s. O R D E R On Octobe r 23, 2001, in a sing le-judg e orde r, the Court dismissed the appea l of the April 13, 2000, Boa rd of Ve tera

ns' Appea ls decision afte r t he appellant, throug h counsel, filed a memora ndum in w hic h s he wi thd

re w he r ap pe a l as to all c la ims , e xce pt a c la im o f c le ar a

nd un mis taka

ble e rr or in a F ebrua ry 1958 VA re g ional office decision over which t h i s Court lacked jur isdiction. On November

14, 2001, the Court rec ei v ed an o u t-of-time motion for a panel de cision. On November

26, 2001, the appe llant filed a motion to direct the Clerk to acc ept for filing the motion for a panel de cision. The Court will construe this motion as a motion for leave to f ile the motion for a pane l decision out of time.
On J anuar y 4, 2002, this Court receive d the appe llant's N otice of A ppeal (NOA) to the United State s Court of Ap pe a ls fo r the F e de ra l Cir c uit (F e de ra l Cir c uit ). Al tho ugh th e a pp e lla nt p ur po rt s that her N OA is " conditioned" on this Court ruling unfavor ably on her two pending motions, such a " conditional" N OA is not contemplated by the Court' s rules.
Be cause the filing of the NOA seeking revie w in the Fe dera l Circ uit de prives this Court of jurisdiction over this case , see Sumner v . Principi , 15 Vet.App. 40 4 (2002) ( en banc order ) (dismissing for la ck of jurisdiction motion for en banc r econside ration af ter re ceivingnotice of f

iling of NO A t o F e de ra l Cir c uit ); V i l l a m o r v
. W est , 1 1 V e t.A

pp . 1 93 (1 99 8) (e n b anc or de r) ; se e als o Cerullo v. Derwinski , 1 Vet.App. 195, 196 (1991) ( "f iling of an NOA confe rs plenar y jurisdiction up on an a pp e llate c ourt " ), the Court do e s n ot h a ve jur isd ic tio n to re vie w the a pp e lla nt' s unti me ly mot ion fo r a pa ne l de c isi on

or mot io n for lea ve. Th e Cou rt do e s, of c ours e , h a ve jur isd ic tio n to decide its own jurisdiction. Se e Ke lse yv . W est , 1 3 V e t.A

pp . 4 37 (2 00 0) (p e r c ur iam or de r) ; Ma rsh v . W est , 1 1 V e t.A

pp . 4 68 , 4 69 (1 99 8) ; Sm ith ( Ir ma ) v . B ro wn , 10 Vet.App. 330, 332 ( 1997).2

Up on c on sid e ratio n o f t

he fo re g oin g , it

is ORDERED that the appe llant's motions are dismiss ed for lack of jurisdiction.
DA TE D: Ap ri l 16 , 2 00 2 PER CU RI AM

.
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ M. Todd Holt       
|                   |  |  |  | M. Todd Holt           
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Emergency Filtration Products, Inc.
(the ACompany@) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
AReport@), I, Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Steve M. Hanni
Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer

Date: March 21, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 4.1

 

	
Number 

A-
    	
 
    	
Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware
    	
 
    	
Shares 

-0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    


 

LIBERTY INTERACTIVE CORPORATION

 

Series A Liberty Interactive Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that                                                                          is the owner of                                                                              FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES A LIBERTY INTERACTIVE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, OF LIBERTY INTERACTIVE CORPORATION (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

Dated:

 

Liberty Interactive Corporation

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    	
Secretary
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00089

- CR

Martin NNAMDI

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CR7399

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 14, 2024.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnetic susceptibilities measured on rocks of the upper Cook Inlet, Alaska      

      May 1, 2002    

We have measured magnetic susceptibility in the field on most of the geologic rock formations exposed in the upper Cook Inlet near Anchorage and Kenai, Alaska. Measured susceptibilities range from less than our detection limit of 0.01 x 10-3 (SI) to greater than 100 x 10-3 (SI). As expected, mafic igneous rocks have the highest susceptibilities and some sedimentary rocks the lowest. Rocks of the Tertiary Sterling Formation yielded some moderate to high susceptibility values. Although we do not have detailed information on the magnetic mineralogy of the rocks measured here, the higher susceptibilities are sufficient to explain the magnitudes of some short-wavelength aeromagnetic anomalies observed on recent surveys of the upper Cook Inlet.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

## Related Content

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

### Contacts

#### Peter J Haeussler, Ph.D.

##### Research Geologist

Alaska Science Center

pheuslr@usgs.gov

907-786-7447

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Alaska

View All **
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uranium Power Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 22, 2003
    
    By
    
    /s/ Thornton J. DonaldsonThornton J. Donaldson,President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Principal Financial Officer of Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)                  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   August 14, 2012 | /s/ Jay Dent                                                     |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | **Jay Dent**                                                          |
|                         | **Senior Vice President, Finance**

**(Principal Financial Officer)** |

 

1

----
A 

## 0 

# 0 

# 12 Oil!



### TRUFUND FINANCIAL SERVICES, NO. 

### 2024 CW 0132 INC. VERSUS 

### CITY OF BATON ROUGE/ PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE MAY 

### 10, 

### 2024

In Re: 

### City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge,



### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 19th Judicial District Court, 

### Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 645210.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

STAY DENIED; 

### WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. 

### The district court's December 15, 

### 2023 judgment granting the motion for partial 

### summary 

### judgment filed 

## by Defendant -in -Reconvention, TruFund Financial 

### Services, Inc., 

### is a 

### final, appealable 

### judgment pursuant to La. Code Civ. P. art. 1915 (A) (3) . See Jalou II, Inc. v. Liner, 

### 2010-0048 ( La. 

### App. 1st Cir. 

### 6/ 16/10), 43 

### So.3d 1023, 1031 n.5. Therefore, the writ 

### is granted for the 

### limited purpose of 

### remanding the case to the 

### district court with 

### instructions to grant relator, 

## City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, an appeal pursuant to the 

### pleading that notified the 

### district court of its 

### intention to seek writs. See In re Howard, 

### 541 So.2d 195, 197 ( La. 

### 1989) ( per curiam). 

## A copy 

## ofthisCourt'sorder is tobe included in the appellate record.

Miller, J., agrees 

### in part and 

### dissents 

### in part. I agree with the 

### majority's decision to 

## deny relator' s stay request. However, 

## I woulddenythe writ application.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### PUTY CLERKOF COURT FOR THE COURT