alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF KNOLOGY, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: November 14,2005
Exhibit 24.4



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, the undersigned, do hereby appoint Daniel A, Hamann, or Deryl F. Hamann, or either of them, attorney for me and
in my name and on my behalf to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Great Western Bancorporation, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, to be filed or as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 with respect to the registration of the cumulative trust preferred securities of GWB Capital Trust I and the cumulative trust preferred securities of GWB Capital Trust II, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in
the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27thday of January 2006,



/S/    LEO W. SMITH IILeo W. Smith II
exv10w3






Exhibit 10.3




Executive Incentive Plan




     On August 9, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the
“Committee”) of American Superconductor Corporation (the “Company”), and on August
10, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company, approved an executive incentive plan for the
Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2012 (“fiscal 2011”). Participants in the plan
include the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and all remaining executive officers. The Committee
is responsible for determining the payout under the plan to each executive officer except the Chief
Executive Officer.



     The Board of Directors of the Company determines the payout under the plan for the Chief
Executive Officer, taking into account the recommendation received from the Committee.



     Pursuant to the plan, the Committee designated for each executive officer a target cash
incentive amount, expressed as a percentage of the officer’s base salary. In establishing these
targets, the Committee took into account for each officer the level of total compensation including
base salary, cash incentive and equity paid by similar companies for comparable positions based on
market data compiled by the Committee’s outside compensation consultant Pearl Meyer & Partners.



     The amount of the incentive award actually paid to each executive officer may be less than or
greater than the executive’s target cash incentive, with the amount capped at 156% of the target
incentive. For each executive officer, individual incentive awards will be determined following the
end of fiscal 2011 based on the following factors and their corresponding weightings:




	 	•	 	the Company’s net income (loss) before amortization of
acquisition-related intangibles, restructuring and impairments,
stock-based compensation expense, other unusual charges and any tax
effects related to these items for fiscal 2011 as compared to the
target established by the Committee — 40%
	 
	 	•	 	the executive’s achievement of individual, measurable objectives
during fiscal 2011 as determined by the Committee for all executives
with the exception of the Chief Executive Officer, who is evaluated by
the Board of Directors — 40%
	 
	 	•	 	the executive’s overall contribution during fiscal 2011 towards the
achievement of the Company’s financial and non-financial objectives
(subjective performance measure) — 20%





     The following table sets forth each current executive officer’s target cash incentive for
fiscal 2011:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Target Incentive as % of	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Title	 	Base Salary	 	Target Incentive
	Daniel P. McGahn
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	100%	 	$480,000
	David A. Henry
	 	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary	 	50%	 	$153,000
	Timothy D. Poor
	 	Executive Vice President, Sales, Business Development and Wind Segment	 	75%	 	$217,500
	Susan J. DiCecco
	 	Senior Vice President, Corporate Administration	 	50%	 	$121,000
| |    |  |  |  |  |                                        |  |                  
| | -- |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
| | E8 |  |  |  |  | Shell Annual Report and Form 20-F 2012 |  | reports.shell.com
| |    |  |  |  |  | Exhibits                              



|            
|------------
|EXHIBIT 13.1

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Royal Dutch Shell plc (the Company) 2012, a corporation organised under the laws of
England and Wales for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies, in all material
respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

The
foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    Peter Voser     
|Peter Voser            
|Chief Executive Officer
|/s/    Simon
Henry     
|Simon Henry            
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 13, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3311 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3311

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2012

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 2601 2nd Avenue 
   North, Billings, Montana, as the ``James F. Battin United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES F. BATTIN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Designation.--The United States courthouse located at 
        2601 2nd Avenue North, Billings, Montana, shall be known and 
        designated as the ``James F. Battin United States Courthouse''.
            (2) Technical amendment.--The ``James F. Battin United 
        States Courthouse'' located at 315 North 26th Street, Billings, 
        Montana, shall no longer be known and designated as the ``James 
        F. Battin United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse referred to in subsection (a)(1) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``James F. Battin United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate September 22 (legislative day, September 
      21), 2012.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Pengrowth Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek W. Evans, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: February 28, 2017


/s/ Derek W. EvansName:  Derek W. EvansTitle:    President and Chief Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ ________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Rehearing No. 534 Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,

Justices 130078

ABDUL AL-SHIMMARI, Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, SC: 130078 v COA: 262655 Wayne CC: 04-407162-NH THE DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, UNIVERSITY NEUROSURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C., and SETTI RENGACHARY, M.D., Defendants-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees.

In this cause, a motion for rehearin g is considered and it is DENIED.

Cavanagh, Weaver and Kelly , JJ., would grant rehearing.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 12, 2007

Clerk
# C_2004272EN.01000601.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3516 — REPSOL YPF/SHELL PORTUGAL)

(2004/C 272/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3516. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3516. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 1, 2010 

# Order

December 1, 2010

139505 (126)(131)

TARA KATHERINE HAMED, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 139505 v COA: 278017 Wayne CC: 03-327525-NZ WAYNE COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendants-Appellants, and

SERGEANT KENNETH DAWWISH, CORPORAL NETTI JACKSON, SHERIFF WARREN C. EVANS, and DEPUTY REGINALD JOHNSON,
Defendants.

___________________ _________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension of time for filing her brief is considered and, it appearing the brief was filed November 1, 2010, the time for filing is exte nded to that date. The motio n by the Michigan Municipal League and others for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is granted.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sitestar Corporation, (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Frank Erhartic,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Daniel Judd,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify to our knowledge
and in our capacity as officers of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate.





/s/ Frank Erhartic, Jr.
                
                /s/ Daniel JuddFrank
      Erhartic, Jr.
                
                Daniel
      JuddChief
      Executive Officer and President
                
                Chief
      Financial OfficerOctober
      8, 2009
                
                October
      8, 2009
Audrey III – A Tier II Plant 

Exposure Estimation Tool

by Plant Exposure Model Work Group

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pesticide Programs
Plant Exposure Model Work

Group

 R. David Jones

 Frank Farruggia

 Charles Peck

 Kris Garber

 Brian Kiernan

 Dirk Young

 Elizabeth Riley

 Advisors:

 Ed Odenkirchen

 Marietta Echeverria

2
Audrey I 

Audrey II 

Audrey III 3
Overview

 History

 General Description

 Terrestrial Conceptual Model

 Semi-aquatic Conceptual Model

 Summary

4
Plant Exposure Model History

 TerrPlant developed in early 1990s

Mike Davy

 Developed from ‘Back of the Envelope’ 

aquatic model

Coded into a spreadsheet ~2005

 First drafts of a replacement:

Garber & Kiernan 2008

 Audrey project approved 2012

Builds on Garber & Kiernan effort

5
Audrey III General Description 

 Purpose:

 Replace and upgrade current plant exposure model

 Three components

 Terrestrial

 Semi-aquatic

 Aquatic – little change from current practice

 Focus on conceptual model development

 Imbedded in new PRZM/EXAMS shell

 Tier 2 Model

 Uses same scenarios as aquatic modeling

6
7

Non-target Area Terrestrial Plant Exposure

Md, Vd

MSD, P

Mf, R Mo, S

Treated field Nontarget Area

Spray drift

Md mass in nontarget area on day (kg)

Mf mass from treated field (kg)

Mo mass leaving nontarget area (kg)

MSD spray drift (kg)

Me mass in exfiltration (kg)

Md-1 mass in nontarget area from 

previous day (kg)

Mp mass on plants (kg)

Mp-1 mass on plants from previous day (kg)

f leaf area index (unitless)

Vt volume of water retained in 

nontarget area (cm3)

R runoff flow (cm3)

P precipitation (cm3)

S sheet flow (cm3)

Ve volume of water in exfiltration (cm3)

A surface area of nontarget area (cm2)

ks aerobic soil rate constant (day-1)

kf foliar dissipation rate constant (day-1)

d=15 cm

Me, Ve

Assumptions:

1. Non-target area equivalent to a pasture/meadow.

2. Loss of water from evapotranspiration negligible compared to other routes.

3. Ve constant.

MP

9
10

Semi-Aquatic Plant Conceptual Model

10 hectare field

100% Treated

(PRZM) 1 hectare 

water body

water body Depth 

= 15 cm

Runoff, 

Sediment, & 

Pesticide

(VVWM or PFAM)

Water + 

Pesticide
Aquatic Conceptual Model

10 hectare field

100% treated

1 hectare

x 2 m pond

11
Summary

 PRZM output used as input

 Exposure:

 Area based (lb/acre)

 seedling emergence

 vegetative vigor

 Concentration based - aquatic endpoints

 Key parameters

 Terrestrial: width & depth of Plant Exposure Zone 

 Semi-aquatic: depth of water

 Exposure metrics similar to current Tier 2 aquatic 

metrics

 1 in 10 year peaks (& means, if necessary)

12
Form CGFCRD3 (4/4/2019)

United States Bankruptcy Court

 Southern District of Florida

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

Case Number: 18−16248−MAM Adversary Number: 19−01298−MAM

In re:

Name of Debtor(s): Chance & Anthem, LLC

 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

Robert C Furr

Plaintiff(s)

VS.

Jeffrey M Siskind, Siskind Legal Services, Tanya Siskind, Second

Siskind Family Trust, CannaMed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, OB Real

Estate Holdings 1732, LLC, Sovereign Gaming and Entertainment,

LLC, Florida's Association of Community Banks and Credit Unions,

Incorporated, Sympatico Equine Rescue, Inc., Wellington 3445, LP,

Zokaites Properties, LP and Robert Gibson

Defendant(s)

 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−/

NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held on January 28, 2020 at 10:00 AM at the following

location:

Flagler Waterview Building

1515 N Flagler Dr Room 801 Courtroom A

West Palm Beach FL 33401

to consider the following:

Amended Motion (217 Motion to Extend Time to January 31, 2020) Filed by Defendants CannaMed

Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Florida's Association of Community Banks and Credit Unions, Incorporated,

Second Siskind Family Trust, Tanya Siskind, Siskind Legal Services, Sovereign Gaming and

Entertainment, LLC, Sympatico Equine Rescue, Inc. (221)

THE MOVANT (OR MOVANT'S COUNSEL if represented by an attorney) SHALL SERVE A COPY OF

THIS NOTICE OF HEARING and, unless previously served, the above−described pleading on all required

parties within the time frames required by the Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules, or orders of the Court, and

shall file a certificate of service as required under Local Rules 2002−1(F) and 9073−1(B). Any party

who fails to properly serve any pleadings or other paper may be denied the opportunity to be heard

thereon.

PLEASE NOTE: Photo identification is required to gain entrance to all federal courthouse facilities.

Electronic devices, including but not limited to cameras, cellular phones (including those with cameras),

iPads, tablets, pagers, personal data assistants (PDA), laptop computers, radios, tape−recorders, etc., are

not permitted in the courtroom, chambers or other environs of this court. These restrictions (except for

cameras not integrated into a cell phone device) do not apply to attorneys with a valid Florida Bar

identification card, attorneys who have been authorized to appear by pro hac vice order and witnesses

subpoenaed to appear in a specific case. No one is permitted to bring a camera or other prohibited

electronic device into a federal courthouse facility except with a written order signed by a judge

and verified by the United States Marshal's Service. See Local Rule 5072−2.

Dated: 1/3/20 CLERK OF COURT

By: Maria Romaguera−Serfaty

Courtroom Deputy

Case 19-01298-MAM Doc 222 Filed 01/03/20 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Magnitude and frequency of floods in North Carolina, technique for estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods on natural streams in North Carolina      

      January 1, 1976    

View Document

Methods are provided to estimate the magnitude and frequency of floods on natural North Carolina streams with drainage areas greater than 0.5 square mile (1.3 square kilometers). For 257 gaged sites, the magnitudes of floods having recurrence intervals from 2 to 100 years are provided in tables. For ungaged sites, equations, graphs, and maps allow estimation of flood magnitudes. Multiple regression techniques were used to define the relation between flood peaks and seven basin and climatic variables. Drainage area is the most significant variable. Inclusion of the other six variables reduced the standard error of estimate less than 4 percent. Regression equations gave consistently different results for stations in the Coastal Plain than for stations in the mountains and Piedmont. Accordingly, stations were divided into two groups and estimating equations were developed for each geographic area.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Contact

####             Water Resources Mission Area - Headquarters        

USGS Headquarters12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - North Carolina

View All **
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7149

ALICCIA VOSS,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 06-0786,

Judge Bruce E. Kasold.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The court treats Aliccia Voss's letter as a motion for an extension of time to file

her brief.

The court notes that Voss's appeal was dismissed on February 11, 2009 for

failure to file a brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion will be granted, the mandate will be recalled, the dismissal order will

be vacated, and the petition for review will be reinstated, if Voss files her brief within 30

days of the date of filing of this order.
FOR THE COURT

MAR 0 9 2009	/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date	

Jan Horbaly

Clerk FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

MAR 0 9 2009

JAN

CLERK

Cc:	Aliccia Voss (informal brief form enclosed)

David F. D'Alessandris, Esq.

s20

2008-7149	- 2
# L_2008046DE.01005102.xml

| 21.2.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 46/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 46/51

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 854/2004 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 29. April 2004 mit besonderen Verfahrensvorschriften für die amtliche Überwachung von zum menschlichen Verzehr bestimmten Erzeugnissen tierischen Ursprungs

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 139 vom 30. April 2004
  . Berichtigte Fassung im
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 226 vom 25. Juni 2004
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 139 vom 30. April 2004

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 226 vom 25. Juni 2004

Die nachstehenden Bezugnahmen beziehen sich auf die Veröffentlichung im Amtsblatt L 226 vom 25. Juni 2004.

Seite 108, Anhang I Abschnitt IV Kapitel I Buchstabe B, Einleitungssatz:

anstatt:

„Die Schlachtkörper und die Nebenprodukte der Schlachtung der über sechs Monate alten Rinder sind den folgenden Verfahren der Fleischuntersuchung zu unterziehen:“

muss es heißen:

„Die Schlachtkörper und die Nebenprodukte der Schlachtung der über sechs Wochen alten Rinder sind den folgenden Verfahren der Fleischuntersuchung zu unterziehen:“.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Interagency report; Astrogeology 60, Geologic maps and terrain analysis data for Viking Mars 1975 landing sites considered in February and April 1973      

      January 1, 1975    

View Document

No abstract available.

## Citation Information