alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005007EN.01000401.xml

| 11.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3380 — UTC/Linde Kältechnik)

(2005/C 7/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3380. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3380. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex).

---
**Exhibit 31.2******

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Umesh Patel, the Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that: 

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Digital Learning Management Corporation; 

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

> 
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mot recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

> 
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3172 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Ethanoyl chloride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Ethanoyl 

chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHANOYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.67 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 acetyl chloride) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3172 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Savi Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mario Procopio,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Savi Media Group, Inc. and will be retained by Savi Media Group, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                August 21, 2006
            By:*/s/
                MARIO PROCOPIO*Mario
                ProcopioChief
                Executive Officer
## Jeffrey Energy Center Units 1, 2 & 3 Upgrade Project

Engineering, Architecture, Construction, Environmental and Consulting Solutions Location: St. Marys, Kan.

Client: Westar Energy

Completion Date: 2009



### PROJECT SUMMARY
Burns & McDonnell provided professional services including design and procurement for the upgrade of existing limestone wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system to achieve in excess of 95 percent SO 2 removal at Westar's Jeffrey Energy Center Units 1, 2 and 3 in St. Marys, Kan.



### SERVICES PROVIDED

 Conceptual engineering

 Permitting support

 Project management

 Detailed design

 Procurement and expediting

 Construction management



### PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION The Jeffrey Energy Center project included upgrades to the existing WFGD system to replace the module internals, including mist eliminators. The project added forced oxidation, eliminated flue gas bypass, increased capacity of the limestone grinding system and added a gypsum dewatering system. Induced draft (ID) fans were upgraded and ductwork was replaced. The existing chimneys were modified for wet

- stack operation including installation of a target wall, elevated liner floor, liquid collection systems, upgraded annulus pressurization system and replacement of materials not suitable for the corrosive wet environment. The gypsum waste material was disposed of in an on

- site landfill.



### PROJECT FEATURES

 95 percent minimum SO 2 removal

 Forced oxidation

 Replaced ball mills

 Upgraded induced draft (ID) fans

 New reconfigured ductwork around FGD

 New dewatering system

 Wet

- stack chimney modifications

© 2015 Burns & McDonnell. All Rights Reserved. www.burnsmcd.com
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3575

___________________________

Kasib Tauheed Bilal

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company, (originally named as Progressive

Home Owners & Auto Insurance Company)

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

Submitted: September 24, 2018

Filed: October 16, 2018

[Published]

____________

Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
In this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Kasib Bilal appeals

following the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment. Upon careful de 1

novo review, see Withers v. Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., 636 F.3d 958, 962 (8th Cir.

2011), we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment

and we find no other basis for reversal.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas.

-2-
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION III 

Ms. Joyce Epps, Director 

Bureau of Air Quality 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 

P.O. Box 8468 

400 Market Street 

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-2063 

Dear Ms. Epps: 

On September 28,2011, the Environmental Protection Agency received a revision to the 

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection pertaining to new source review permitting to address national 

ambient air quality standards for particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers. EPA has 

determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to 

prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Gera11yn Duke, 

Office of Permits and Air Toxics, at (215) 814-2084. She is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

"'J)I.~~ 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
exv10w7






EXHIBIT 10.7




CONFORMED COPY



As of September 21, 2011




Martin J. Wygod

c/o WebMD Health Corp.

16092 San Dieguito Road

P.O. Box 676306

Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067-6306



Dear Marty:




     The purpose of this letter is to amend your Employment Agreement with WebMD Health Corp. (the
“Company”) dated August 3, 2005, as amended on each of February 1, 2006, December 1, 2008, December
29, 2008 and July 9, 2009 (as so amended, the “Employment Agreement”).



     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved an increase in your annual base
salary from $120,000 to $490,000. Accordingly, the first and second sentences of Section 2.1 of
the Employment Agreement are amended to read as follows: “Effective September 21, 2011, the Company
shall pay Executive for services during the Employment Period a base salary at the annual rate of
$490,000”.



     Except as set forth herein, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect and is
hereby ratified in all respects. All references to the Employment Agreement shall be deemed a
reference to the Employment Agreement as amended hereby.


Sincerely,



WebMD Health Corp.




	 	 	 

	/s/ Lewis H. Leicher
 

By: Lewis H. Leicher

	 	 
	Title: Senior Vice President
	 	 





Agreed to:




	 	 	 

	/s/ Martin J. Wygod
 

Martin J. Wygod
From Boucher Michael

Sent Thursday April 30 2009 345 PM GMT

To Wersinger Kate kwersingersteptoe .com sgoldberg@steptoe.com

Cc Edwards .Dennis@epamail .epa.gov Hardy.Michaelepamail .epa.gov philip.ross@epa.gov

Boucher Michael mbouchermckennalong.com

Subject April 28 2009 letter from Seth Goldberg to Dennis Edwards and Philip Ross

Dear Mr Goldberg

Please advise me whether may expect to receive copy of your original unredacted submission to EPA Thank you

Very truly yours

Michael Boucher

Counsel to Buckman Laboratories Inc

Michael Boucher Partner

McKenna Long Aldridge LLP

1900 Street NW Washington DC 20006

Tel 202.496.7729 Fax 202.496.7756 mbouchermckennalong.com

Original Message

From Wersinger Kate kwersinger@steptoe comi

Sent Wednesday April 29 2009 422 PM

To Boucher Michael

Cc Edwards.Dennisepamail.epa.gov Hardy.Michaelepamail.epa.gov philip.rossepa.gov

Subject

Nalco.pdf Mr Boucher At the request of Mr Ross attached is public disclosure copy of document submitted yesterday in further

support of Nalcos petition to cancel Buckmans ammonia products

Please let me know if you have any questions

Best regards

Kate Wersinger

Legal Executive Assistant

to Elizabeth Brown

and Seth Goldberg

Steptoe Johnson LLP

1330 Connecticut Avenue NW

Washington DC 20036-1795

202 429-6214

The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link

attachments

Nalco.pdf

Note To protect against computer viruses e-mail programs may prevent

sending or receiving certain types of file attachments Check your
e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO FAA EXEMPTION NO. 11682

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11682 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 

Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0353-0001. 

Dear Sir or Madam; 

Stephen E Van Vickle was issued an Exemption numbered 11682 (hereinafter the Exemption) 

for the purpose of aerial data collection. Stephen E Van Vickle herby requests an amendment to 

the Exemption to allow an additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully 

complies with the conditions of the Exemption. 

Stephen E Van Vickle wishes to operate a DJI Phantom3 and DJI Inspire 1 under the same terms 

and conditions contained in the Exemption. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full 

compliance with the terms of the Exemption. 

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another type 

of unmanned aerial vehicle, Stephen E Van Vickle respectfully submits that good cause exists so 

that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested 

amendment. 

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an 

amendment to the Exemption. 

Sincerely yours, 

\s\

Stephen E Van Vickle
# L_2005045EN.01001801.xml

| 16.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 45/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 45/18

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 145 of 30 April 2004
  )

On page 29, in Article 40(5), in the sixth line, after ‘Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of ...’ the following date shall be inserted:

and footnote 1 shall read as follows:

| ‘(1) | OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 64.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

On page 38, in Article 65, the following dates shall be inserted in the relevant paragraphs as follows:

| — | paragraph 1 | : | ‘30 April 2006’, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| — | paragraph 2 | : | ‘30 April 2007’, |
| — | paragraph 3 | : | ‘30 October 2006’, |
| — | paragraph 4 | : | ‘30 October 2006’, |
| — | paragraph 6 | : | ‘30 April 2005’. |

—

paragraph 1

:

‘30 April 2006’,

—

paragraph 2

:

‘30 April 2007’,

—

paragraph 3

:

‘30 October 2006’,

—

paragraph 4

:

‘30 October 2006’,

—

paragraph 6

:

‘30 April 2005’.

and footnotes (*), (**), (***) and (****) shall be deleted.

On page 38, in Article 66, and on page 39, in Article 67(1) and Article 68:

| — | the Directive with incomplete references shall read as follows:


  ‘Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of
  21 April 2004
  on markets in financial instruments (*)’. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Directive with incomplete references shall read as follows:

‘Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of
  21 April 2004
  on markets in financial instruments (*)’.

| — | footnote 1 is deleted and footnote (*) shall read as follows:







  ‘(*) | OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1.’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

footnote 1 is deleted and footnote (*) shall read as follows:

‘(*)

On page 39, in Article 69, on page 40, in the first subparagraph of Article 70, and in Article 71(1), (2), (3) and (4), the following date shall be inserted:

and footnote (*) shall be deleted.

On page 40, in Article 71(5), sixth line:

for:

‘..., and provided that the request concerned is made within 18 months of the date referred to in Article 70.’,

read:

‘..., and provided that the request concerned is made before 30 October 2007.’

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Essential Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 28, 2006



/s/ C. Lee JonesName:

C. Lee JonesTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Dennis N. CavenderName:

Dennis N. CavenderTitle:

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: SCHEDULE OF HOLIDAYS

FOR YEAR 201 7 FOR STAFFS OF THE APPELLATE COURTS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTS : : : : : : No. 458 Judicial Administration Docket

**ORDER PER CURIA** **M**
**AN D**  **NOW**, this 19th day of January, 201 6 , it is hereby ordered that the following paid holidays for calendar year 201 7 will be observed on the dates specified below by all employees of the appellate courts and the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts: January 2 , 201 7 New Year’s Day Observed

January 1 6 , 201 7 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day February 20 , 201 7 Presidents’ Day April 14 , 201 7 Good Friday May 2 9 , 201 7 Memorial Day July 4 , 201 7 Independence Day September 4 , 201 7 Labor Day October 9 , 201 7 Columbus Day November 7 , 201 7 Election Day** November 1 0 , 201 7 Veterans ’ Day Observed November 2 3 , 201 7 Thanksgiving Day November 24 , 201 7 Day after Thanksgiving December 25, 201 7 Christmas Day

**AOPC only; Appellate courts will be open

.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3031 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on dimethyl malonate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on dimethyl 

malonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIMETHYL MALONATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 dimethyl malonate) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3031 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-177-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)