alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004198EN.01000401.xml

| 5.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 198/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 198/4

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 596/2004 of 30 March 2004 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of export licences in the egg sector

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 94 of 31 March 2004
  )

On page 38, in Annex II:

for:

‘fax (32-2) 298 87 86’,

read:

‘fax (32-2) 298 87 96’.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby
certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 13, 2005 |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson                
|                    |  | Rodger L. Johnson                    
|                    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF QUEST SOFTWARE, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                      JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
----                                      ----------------------------

<S>                                       <C>
MBR Technologies, Inc.                          California
Foglight Software, Inc.                         Delaware
Client/Server Solutions, Inc.                   Missouri
RevealNet, Inc.                                 Virginia
1397639 Ontario Ltd.                            Ontario, Canada
MessageWise, Inc.                               Ontario, Canada
881229 Alberta Ltd.                             Alberta, Canada
Fastlane Technologies, Inc.                     Canada
Fastlane Technologies (UK) Limited              United Kingdom
Fastlane Technologies Corporation               Delaware
OnWire Technologies, Inc.                       Massachusetts
Active Concepts Pty, Ltd.                       Australia
Active Concepts, Inc.                           California
Fresh Dew Investments Limited                   British Virgin Islands
Murecia Investments Limited                     British Virgin Islands
Quest Software France SARL                      France
Quest Software (UK) Ltd.                        United Kingdom
Quest Software Pty., Ltd.                       Australia
Q.S.I. Quest Software Israel Limited            Israel
Quest Software Company Limited                  Ireland
Quest Holding Company, LLC                      California
Quest Softair, Inc.                             California
Quest Software, Ltda                            Brazil
Quest Software Espana, S.A.                     Spain
Quest Software Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.        Mexico
Quest Software Benelux B.V.                     Netherlands
Quest Norge AS                                  Norway
Quest Scandinavia AS                            Denmark
AB Grundstenen 90479                            Sweden
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on February 2-3, 2009, in the Carlton Room, at the St. Regis Washington, DC, 923 16th and K Streets, NW., from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on establishing and supervising a schedule to conduct periodic reviews of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities.

The Committee will receive briefings about studies on compensation for veterans with service-connected disabilities and other veteran benefits programs. The Committee will break into subcommittees on the afternoon of February 2 and the morning of February 3 to begin working on recommendations. An open forum for verbal statements from the public will be available in the afternoon on February 3. People wishing to make oral statements before the Committee will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis and will be provided three minutes per statement.

Interested persons may submit written statements to the Committee before the meeting, or within 10 days after the meeting, by sending them to Ms. Ersie Farber, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration (211A), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting should contact Ms. Farber at (202) 461-9728.

Dated: January 12, 2009.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-977 Filed 1-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2948 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Aspirin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Aspirin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ASPIRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.11 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Aspirin) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

7 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 32004Q0429(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004Q0429(01)

**Amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities **

*
Official Journal L 127 , 29/04/2004 P. 0107 - 0107 *

Amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities

THE COURT,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, in particular the last paragraph of Article 223 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, in particular the last paragraph of Article 139 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Because of the accession of the new Member States, the Council has, by decision of 19 April 2004, amended inter alia the provision of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice concerning the number of Judges forming the Grand Chamber and the provisions of the Rules of Procedure concerning the composition of that formation of the Court must consequently be adjusted.

(2) With the approval of the Council given on 19 April 2004,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:

Article 1

The Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 19 June 1991 (OJ L 176, 4.7.1991, p. 7; corrigendum: OJ L 383, 29.12.1992, p. 117), as amended on 21 February 1995 (OJ L 44, 28.2.1995, p. 61), 11 March 1997 (OJ L 103, 19.4.1997, p. 1, with corrigendum: OJ L 351, 23.12.1997, p. 72), 16 May 2000 (OJ L 122, 24.5.2000, p. 43), 28 November 2000 (OJ L 322, 19.12.2000, p. 1), 3 April 2001 (OJ L 119, 27.4.2001, p. 1), 17 September 2002 (OJ L 272, 10.10.2002, p. 24, with corrigendum: OJ L 272, 19.10.2002, p. 24), and 8 April 2003 (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 17), are amended as follows:

1. in the second indent of Article 11a, "11" shall be replaced by "13";

2. in Article 11b(1), "11" shall be replaced by "13".

Article 2

These amendments to the Rules of Procedure shall enter into force on the same day as the Council's Decision of 19 April 2004 amending the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 April 2004.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-82784, 333-38002, 333-49668, 333-91429, 333-96183, 333-103010, 333-107045, 333-113927, 333-116761, 333-125398 and 333-126585 on Form S-8; and Registration Statement No. 333-63596 on Form S-4 of our
reports dated December 7, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Quest Software, Inc. (the Company) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-based Payment, and FASB Staff Position No. AUG AIR-1, Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities, discussed in Note 1 and an explanatory paragraph relating to the
restatement discussed in Note 2) and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (which report expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting and expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness on the Companys internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP              
|Costa Mesa, California December 7,
2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-4642

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEVON FAUCETT, a/k/a D,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, 

District Judge. (2:07-cr-00153-1)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, 

Appellate Counsel, George H. Lancaster, Jr., Assistant Federal 

Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. 

Booth Goodwin II, United States Attorney, William B. King, II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Devon Faucett was convicted of violating the terms of 

his supervised release and was sentenced to twelve months’ 

imprisonment. On appeal, Faucett argues there was insufficient 

evidence to support a finding that he violated his supervised 

release by constructively possessing marijuana with the intent 

to distribute, and that his sentence is plainly unreasonable as 

a result. We affirm.

We review a district court’s decision to revoke 

supervised release for abuse of discretion. United States v. 

Copley, 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992). To revoke supervised 

release, the district court need only find a violation of a 

condition of release by a preponderance of the evidence. 18 

U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West Supp. 2011). This burden “simply 

requires the trier of fact to believe that the existence of a 

fact is more probable than its nonexistence.” United States v. 

Manigan, 592 F.3d 621, 631 (4th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation 

marks omitted). We review for clear error factual findings 

underlying the conclusion that a violation of supervised release 

occurred. United States v. Carothers, 337 F.3d 1017, 1019 (8th 

Cir. 2003). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that 

the district court neither clearly erred in finding that Faucett 

possessed marijuana with the intent to distribute, nor abused 

its discretion in revoking Faucett’s supervised release. 
3

Faucett also challenges his twelve-month sentence on 

the sole ground that the district court improperly calculated 

his policy statement range based on a Grade A violation, because 

the court’s finding that he possesses marijuana with the intent 

to distribute was clearly erroneous. As discussed above, this 

claim is without merit. We therefore affirm Faucett’s sentence. 

See United States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 439–40 (4th Cir. 

2006) (stating a sentence imposed following revocation of 

supervised release will be affirmed if it is within the 

applicable statutory maximum and not plainly unreasonable). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, David E. Kennedy, President and Chief Executive Officer of Susquehanna Media Co., certify that:     1.      Ihave reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 ofSusquehanna Media Co.;     2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    Dated:December 5, 2005 /s/ David E. Kennedy     David E. Kennedy
AMENDMENT NO.3 TO THE EL PASO CORPORATION 2001 STOCK OPTION PLAN



 EXHIBIT 10.C.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE 
 EL PASO CORPORATION 

2001 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
 WHEREAS, El Paso Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the El Paso Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective as of January 29, 2001, as amended (the
“Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors or the “Plan
Administrator” (as defined in the Plan) may from time to time make such amendments to the Plan as either of them may deem proper and in the best interests of the Company; 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to clarify provisions of the Plan to reflect the intent of the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee with respect to adjustments in the number of authorized shares
under the Plan. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the following amendment shall be made to the Plan: 

Section 2.2 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“In the event of a recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, exchange of shares, merger, reorganization, change
in corporate structure or shares of the Company or similar event, the Board of Directors or the Plan Administrator shall make such adjustments, if any, as it determines are appropriate and equitable to (i) the number of shares authorized for
issuance under the Plan and (ii) the number of shares and the option price with respect to outstanding stock options. Any such adjustment shall be final, binding and conclusive on all persons claiming any right or interest under the Plan.”

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, effective as of
October 26, 2006. 
  

			
	EL PASO CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Susan B. Ortenstone

	Susan B. Ortenstone
	Its Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Administration


  

	
	Attest:
	
	             /s/ David L.
Siddall

	            Corporate Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ohio Legacy Corp (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ L. Dwight Douce                            
|L. Dwight Douce                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                                               
|/s/ Eric S. Nadeau                             
|Eric S. Nadeau                                 
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer          



August 13, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.2


                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE



The Board of Directors and Stockholders of HotJobs.com, Ltd.:


The audit referred to in our report dated February 7, 2000, included the
related financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December
31, 1999, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. This financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
based on our audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.

                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


New York, New York
March 22, 2000
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Daniel Sherman Brown v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-15-00291-CR; 01-15-292-CR; 01-15-00293-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1414895, 1422157; 1422158

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County

On January 21, 2016, we issued an order, abating these appeals and remanding to the trial 

court to hold a hearing to determine why appellant had not filed his brief. On February 4, 2016, 

appointed counsel tendered appellant’s brief.

Accordingly, we order the appeasl reinstated on the active docket, we withdraw our order 

of January 21, 2016, and order appellant’s brief filed. The State’s brief is due on or before March 

10, 2016.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually 

Date: February 11, 2016