=or' 

MARH & ASSOCIATES '^:^f :!^([0^, 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW --•cT'^ffcp}T-!^io 

3325 WILSHIKEROUl.liVARD, sum-: IJ50 ' ' "~ '^' ^^^'^^^^••'k ) 

LOS ANGn rS. CALirORNIA 90010 

TEL (213) 487-9iyO /(;{? p^fj 9 [ A jfl: 0"^ 

I AX: (213) 487-9+84 '"^ - ' ^^ ''-' ^ -

i;-MAil • MAR1ILAW01-I-1C1-@YA1I00.COM 

February 10,2012 

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Re: FAA Case No. 201 INMVIOOOI/Entertainment Fusion Group / p W 

TO ALL PARTIES: 

Entertainment Fusion Group hereby submits its Answer to the above identified matter, as 

follows: 

1. Entertainment Fusion Group (hereinafter "EFG") denies the allegations in 

paragraph 1. 

2. EFG admits the allegations in paragraph 2. 

3. EFG admits the allegations in paragraph 3. 

4. EFG is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations in 

paragraph 4. 

5. EFG admits the allegations in paragraph 5 as it relates to the nature of the product, 

but is without sufficient information to admit or deny that any of the bottles were broken or 

leaked. 

6. EFG admits the allegations in paragraph 6 that the package contained three nail 

enamel bottles, but is without sufficient information to admit or deny that any of the bottles were 

broken or that their were pieces of sharp glass amongst the contents. 

7. EFG is without sufficient information to admit or deny the allegations in 

paragraph 7 that the substance contained in the package is classified as hazardous material. 

8. EFG is without sufficient information to admit or deny that the allegations in 

paragraph 8 that the proper shipping name and description for this substance is "Paint, Class 3, 

UN2163, PGII." 

,1-t ^ 
MARH & ASSOCIATES 

February 10,2012 

Page 2 

9. EFG admits the allegations of paragraph 9. 

10. EFG admits the allegations of paragraph 10, but asserts it was unaware that the 

shipment was considered hazardous materials requiring special shipping instructions. 

11. EFG admits the allegations of paragraph 11, but asserts it was unaware that the 

shipment was considered hazardous materials requiring special shipping instructions. 

12. EFG admits the allegations of paragraph 12, but asserts it was unaware that the 

shipment was considered hazardous materials requiring special shipping instructions. 

13. EFG admits the allegations of paragraph 13, but asserts that it is not in the 

business of shipping hazardous materials, and as such, denies the remaining allegations in said 

paragraph. 

As and for EFG's response to paragraphs (a) through (k), EFG is without sufficient 

information to admit or deny that the allegations in paragraph (a) through (k). 

Respect 

GORD0N TU9i<JER 

Attorney for Entertainment Fusion Group 

cc: 

Kyle E. Lomazow 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue 

Renton, WA 98057 

Fax:425-227-1007 

Hon.' Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, —20 

.U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200'New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax:'202-366-7536 • 

GT/mm 

Z:\MyFilcs\CiviI\38l6 Enlertainmeni Fusion\Answcr.wpd