alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mr. Todd Homan ·~.+ 

Director, Office of Aviation Analysis Nov. 1, 2014 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE ; I 

Washington D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Homan, 

My name is Albert Kookesh. I am a resident of Angoon, Alaska. I am also former member of the Alaska 

State Legislature, having served in the Alaska State House for eight years and the Alaska State Senate fo" 

eight years. 

I am writing this letter to object to any consideration of ending essential air service between Angoon 

and Juneau for service between Angoon and Sitka. 

I have always objected to decisions being made in Washington D.C. that impact our lives in Alasi<z 

without consideration of the human element that suffer consequences as a result of those distant 

decisions. 

For your information, and for the record, our connection as a community and as a people has historically 

been Juneau. Sitka has never provided for any of our needs such as education, medical, food, 

automotive and boat repair or other survival needs. If the decision is made to eliminate Juneau in favor 

of Sitka, all your decision will do will add a financial impact to our daily needs. We will continue to use 

Juneau for all of our needs but will have to go through Sitka to Juneau. A financial burden many of our 

people cannot afford. 

While Sitka may be a nice town and Harris Air a nice airline company, we ask you to consider the human 

element in "essential Air Service". That human element of the negative impact on our people and our 

way of life that will be a huge impact. 

As an example, if I wanted to go to Juneau to grocery shop at Costco, Walmart or Fred Meyer for food, I 

will add two airline tickets to the cost of my groceries. Harris Air to Sitka and Alaska Air to Juneau. Sitka 

does not have a Costco, Walmart of Fred Meyer. This is a typical example. 

Please consider the human element and historical connection we have to Juneau in your final decision. I 

and all of those individuals that I know in our little community need our connection to Juneau. 

Sincerely 

Sen. Albert Kookesh, retired 

Po box 91 Angoon, Alaska 99820 ( J
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Beverages, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August __, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  August
      30, 2010
                /s/ Ian LongIan
      Long, President & Chief Executive
Officer
# L_2004180EN.01003001.xml

| 15.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 180/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 180/30

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 879/2004 of 29 April 2004 concerning the provisional authorisation of a new use of an additive already authorised in feedingstuffs (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 162 of 30 April 2004
  )

On page 67, in the Annex, in the last column:

for:

‘
  3.5.2007
  ’,

read:

‘
  3.5.2008
  ’.

---
**Exhibit 10.60** **AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY**    **TO:** JONATHAN R. MATHER   **FROM:** SATHIYAMURTHY CHANDRAMOHAN   **SUBJECT:** 2007 INCENTIVE BONUS; DELIVERABLES   **DATE:** 2/20/2007   **CC:** K. SURIYAKUMAR Jonathan, pursuant to Section 3(b) of your November 29, 2006 Employment Agreement withAmerican Reprographics Company (“ARC”), this memorandum shall serve to confirm the performancecriteria to be satisfied during ARC’s 2007 fiscal year in order for you, as “Executive,” to earn an“Incentive Bonus” for this year. As we discussed and agreed, those criteria include each and everyone of the following: a) Cash generated before acquisitions and debt service, 95% of EBITDA for 2007;  b) Closed 2007 acquisitions to generate $42.5 million revenues in 2007;  c) Successfully manage ARC corporate budget, including bonus and expenses incurred inconnection with follow-on offering, not to exceed $17.565 million for 2007; and  d) Implement financial reporting with budgeting and variance reporting by Q4 of 2007.As further agreed, in the event that each and every of these 2007 objectives has been achieved thisyear, the Incentive Bonus shall be fully payable pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement,and in the event each and every of these 2007 objectives is not so achieved, including item d) tomy reasonable satisfaction, payment of any, or no, portion of the 2007 Incentive Bonus shall be asI determine, in my sole and absolute discretion.Kindly sign below to confirm our agreement in this regard. This memorandum shall not amend ormodify the Employment Agreement, which remains in full force and effect.       AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY, EXECUTIVEa Delaware corporation         By: /s/ Sathiyamurthy Chandramohan By: /s/ Jonathan R. Mather       Name: Sathiyamurthy Chandramohan Name: Jonathan R. MatherTitle: CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,646,002
<SECURITIES>                                 4,022,297
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,928,326
<PP&E>                                       1,301,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                 385,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,373,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,649,470
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,554,022
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,373,360
<SALES>                                        220,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,561
<CGS>                                          379,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  379,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,764,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,030,423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,030,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,030,423)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.92)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

MICHAEL HUERTA, 

ADMINISTRATOR, 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

v. 

AIR MEDICAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC, 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) DMS No. FAA-2014-0552 

) FAA Case No. 2014NM070012 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Judge: unassigned 

) 

) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

The Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby designates 

the following Agency Attorney as its representative in the captioned case: 

Adam Runkel, Attorney 

· FAA, Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division- Western Team 

1601 Lind Ave;., S.W. 

Renton, WA 98056 

Phone(425) 227,2914 

Facsimile (425) 227-1007 

Email: adam.runkel@faa.gov 

,1_'. ',;, 

This designation supersedes any previous designation of representation. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch . • 

Assistant Chief. Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: 

Enforcement Division, Western Team
Exhibit 10.39



 Exhibit 10.39 
 Dominion Resources, Inc. 
 2012 Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers*

 The 2012 base salaries for Dominion’s named executive officers are as follows: Thomas F. Farrell II, Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer—$1,315,800; Mark F. McGettrick, Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer—$683,836; Paul D. Koonce, Executive Vice President (Chief Executive Officer—Dominion Virginia Power)—$523,094; David
A. Christian, Executive Vice President (Chief Executive Officer—Dominion Generation)—$607,242; and Gary L. Sypolt, Executive Vice President (Chief Executive Officer—Dominion Energy)—$516,265. 

 
  

	*	Effective March 1, 2012
Appendix C

SEMAP SENSITIVITY STUDY

2 Data Files Included in Electronic Copy Only
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SulphCo,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Rudolf W. Gunnerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Pat Lacy,
Controller, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/S/ RUDOLF W. GUNNERMAN
-----------------------
Rudolf W. Gunnerman
Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2003

/S/ PAT LACY
------------
Pat Lacy
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

May 14, 2003


            This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
ss. 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF KNOLOGY, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his knowledge, thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 10, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001096637
<NAME> GENE CELL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          27,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,752
<PP&E>                                         263,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,732
<BONDS>                                          22632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,778
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,750
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,471
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  566,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (572,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (572,254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (572,254)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

t0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

146823

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146823

COA: 313699 

Kent CC: 12-005622-FC

NAVILLUS TRUDELL HEART, 12-005623-FH

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
# L_2004342EN.01002701.xml

| 18.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/27

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 October 2004

amending the Decision authorising the Director of Europol to enter into negotiations on agreements with third States and non-EU-related bodies

(2004/773/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) (1), and in particular Article 42(2), Article 10(4) and Article 18 thereof,

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing Europol's external relations with third States and non-EU-related bodies (2), and in particular Article 2 of that Act,

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing the receipt of information by Europol from third parties (3), and in particular Article 2 of that Act,

Having regard to the Council Act of 12 March 1999 adopting the rules governing the transmission of personal data by Europol to third States and third bodies (4), and in particular Articles 2 and 3 of that Act,

Whereas:

| (1) | Operational requirements and the need to combat in an effective way organised forms of criminality through Europol, require that Moldova and Ukraine be added to the list of third States with which the Director of Europol is authorised to start negotiations. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Operational requirements and the need to combat in an effective way organised forms of criminality through Europol, require that Moldova and Ukraine be added to the list of third States with which the Director of Europol is authorised to start negotiations.

| (2) | Council Decision of 27 March 2000 (5) should therefore be amended, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Council Decision of 27 March 2000 (5) should therefore be amended,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Council Decision of 27 March 2000 is hereby amended as follows:

| | In Article 2(1), under the heading ‘Third States’, the following States shall be inserted in the alphabetical list:






  — | ‘Moldova’ and |
| --- | --- | --- |

In Article 2(1), under the heading ‘Third States’, the following States shall be inserted in the alphabetical list:

—

‘Moldova’ and

| — | ‘Ukraine’. |
| --- | --- |

—

‘Ukraine’.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 25 October 2004.

For the Council

The President

R. VERDONK

---

(1)  
  OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 2.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 19.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 17.

3

(4)  
  OJ C 88, 30.3.1999, p. 1.

4

(5)  
  OJ C 106, 13.4.2000, p. 1.

5

---
# L_2004172EN.01000902.xml

| 6.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 172/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 172/9

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 of 7 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 133 of 30 April 2004
  )

In the contents, on page 1 in the title and on page 8 in the closing formula:

for:

‘
  7 April 2004
  ’,

read:

‘
  21 April 2004
  ’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> CDN DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.4522
<CASH>                                       2,662,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  155,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,585
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,862,283
<PP&E>                                         262,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,035,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          770,565
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,447
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,256,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,035,329
<SALES>                                         77,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,010
<CGS>                                           18,807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  829,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (797,731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (124,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (673,731)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (673,731)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i)
the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 28, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    DARREN RICHARDSON                                
|                    |  |  |  | Darren Richardson, President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3260 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3260

To provide that no United States assistance may be provided to Pakistan 
                   until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2012

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that no United States assistance may be provided to Pakistan 
                   until Dr. Shakil Afridi is freed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO PAKISTAN.

    No amounts may be obligated or expended to provide any direct 
United States assistance to the Government of Pakistan unless the 
President certifies to Congress that--
            (1) Dr. Shakil Afridi has been released from prison in 
        Pakistan;
            (2) any criminal charges brought against Dr. Afridi, 
        including treason, have been dropped; and
            (3) if necessary to ensure his freedom, Dr. Afridi has been 
        allowed to leave Pakistan.
                                 <all>
```