CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Feather River Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 3. 22 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended October 6

, 20 1 4

Rule Title(s): Stationary Internal Combust ion Engines

Date Submitted to ARB: October 24 , 201 4

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Adopted 6/1/2009

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Timothy Mitro Phone Number: (530) 634

- 7659 ext 208 E

- mail Address: tmitro@fraqmd.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The District correct ed the deficiency as identified by the US EPA in the Limited Approval Limited Disapproval. The

language allowing for alternative NOx analyzers, as approved by t he APCO, has been completely stricken from

the rule. Furthermore, the District added EPA Method 18 as an approval test method for VOC.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach refere nce(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emi ssion information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inven tory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: Yuba and Sutter Count ies

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Ele ctronic Format)

Baseline Invent ory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainm ent Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 43

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N / A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emissi on Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) D.1 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: D

. 2. b

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): D Work Practice Standards in Section(s): D

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): F Reporting Requirements in Section(s): FCALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPAC T ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion:

5/1/2002