alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the
Chief Executive Officer of Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ William L. Hunter                          
|                   |  |  |  | William L. Hunter, M.D. Chief Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 25, 2018

NO. 03

- 17

- 00481

- CV

Republic Capital Group, LLC, Appellant

v.

Jason Roberts; Eden Farms Ltd. ; Ashley & Jason Inc.; Zachary Potts; Northwoods Energy, LLC.; Chanan C orp.; George Atallah; and Saliba Family Trust, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on April 12, 2017. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reve rsible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 10.7


 




 


 


 


March 13, 2008


 


Joe Vander Pluym


 


Dear Joe:


 


The 2008 bonus plan reflects the goals for our company this coming year.  Your bonus is based on Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Income Tax Depreciation Amortization).


 





	
            15%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $  7,300,000
 
	
            22.5%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $  8,300,000
 
	
            30%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $  9,300,000
 
	
            37.5%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $10,400,000
 
	
            50%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $11,500,000
 
	
            62.5%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $12,500,000
 
	
            75%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $13,500,000
 
	
            87.5%
 	
            of your cumulative salary if the company achieves Adjusted EBITDA of  $14,500,000
 





 


In addition, you will earn 12.5% of your cumulative salary if, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee, you meet the goals outlined in the document provided to you separately.


 


A quarterly update will be sent in conjunction with our earnings announcement to update you on the performance of the company versus the bonus plan.


 


The 2008 bonus period covers the fiscal months of February 2008 through January 2009.  You must be an active employee of Bakers Footwear Group at the time the bonus is paid to be eligible to receive your bonus.


 


We are excited about the challenges and prospects in the coming year.  We hope it is a good year for all of our shareholders and us.


 






	
             
 	
            Sincerely,
 





 





	
             
 	
            /s/ Peter Edison
 





 





	
             
 	
            Peter Edison
 





 


ss


 


2815 Scott Avenue • Saint Louis, Missouri 63103 • (314) 621-0699 • Fax (314) 621-0708
EXHIBIT31.3**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Hwee Ling Ng, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary of Sun New Media, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sun New Media, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e)and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report was being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     /s/ Hwee Ling Ng                                        Hwee Ling Ng, Acting Chief FinancialOfficer and Company SecretaryDate: January 13, 2006
exv10w26



 





Exhibit 10.26




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



Amendment to Employment Agreement dated March 5, 2007, between Quest Resource Corporation (the
“Company”) and Steve Hochstein (“Employee”).



WHEREAS, the parties which to modify certain provisions of the Employment Agreement, the parties
hereby agree as follows:





	 	1.	 	Agree to Employ. Section 1(a) is amended to reflect that the Employee shall serve as
Executive VP, Exploration and Resource Development as of December 1, 2007.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf and Employee
has hereunto set his hand the day and year first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	“Employee”	 	“Company”
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Steve Hochstein	 	QUEST RESOURCE CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Steve Hochstein
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Jerry D. Cash
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated: 12/7/07	 	Dated:   12-11-07
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Title:   CEO
# EUR-Lex - 32004M3611 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32004M3611

**Commission Decision of 17/12/2004 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3611 - BORGWARNER / BERU) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

| |Brussels, 17/12/2004

SG-Greffe(2004) D/205941

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject : Case No. COMP/M.3611 – B ORG W ARNER /BERU Notification of 17.11.2004 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No. C 288, 25.11.2004, p.4.

1. On 17.11.2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking BorgWarner Germany GmbH belonging to the BorgWarner Group (“BorgWarner”, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking BERU AG (“BERU”, Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are :

- for BorgWarner : global supplier of parts and components primarily for engine and drivetrain applications for automotive OEMs;

- for BERU : supplier of parts, components and systems for automotive and industrial OEMs and the aftermarket.

3. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 and of paragraph 5, subparagraph c of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No139/2004[2].

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004.

For the Commission

Neelie KROES Member of the Commissionsigned

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

[2] Available on DG COMP website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

MERGER PROCEDURE

ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

PUBLIC VERSION
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




/s/
                  Ron
                  RuskowskyRon
                  RuskowskyChief
                    Executive Officer
 Date: November 29,
        2007
Order entered December 4, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01066
- CR
SHARON HENNINGTON TA YLOR, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17
- 20861
- P



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record was filed November 20, 2018. Missing from the reporter’s record

are :

 State’s Exhibit #3, labeled “CD/911”;

 State’s Exhibit #92, labeled “C D/Donald Taylor’s Phone Records”;

 State’s Exhibit #9 3 , labeled “CD/Sharon Taylor’s Phone Records”;

 State’s Exhibit #98, labeled “DVD/Interview”;

 State’s Exhibit # 500 (duplicate number) , labeled “DVD /January 1st video”;

 State’s Exhibit #700, labeled “DV D/Body Cam/Jessica Ryan”;

 Defendant’s Exhibit #10, labeled CD/911 Call 2010”; Defendant’s Exhibit #11, labeled “CD/911 Call 2013”;

 Defendant’s Exhibit #12, labeled “DVD/GSR Kit Video”; and

 Defendant’s Exhibit #20, labeled “DVD/Body Cam of Jessica Ryan ”.
All exhibits were offered and admitted at trial.
We ORDER court reporter Lisa b eth Kellett to file a supplemental reporter’s record with true and correct playable copies of State’s Exhibits #3, #92, #93, #98, #500, and #700, and
D efendant’s Exhibits #1 0, #11, #12, and #20 within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Byron Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Fairchild International Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Byron Cox
________________________________
Byron Cox
Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
May 19, 2004





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Quest Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald Foster, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* that:

| 1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the*Securities Exchange Act of 1934* , and

 

 

 

 

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 23, 2011

*/s/ Ronald Foster*

 

Ronald Foster

 

Director, Chief Financial Officer,

 

Principal Accounting Officer

                               |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
p.1 

OAR Box 1413 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

71)11-1-71 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:23 PM Sheet 71 of 114 
P.2 

Redn surface 

Paraffin wax 

Adhesion promoter 

Cross cut MyjT Resin 

Resin surface 

Special wax with 

polar components 

"•' " '" '" " -:s* , » . 

^Croslcul'' ^^^iilitl^^'SI^ - Redn-E^f$ :;ggife. 

excellent interlaminar adhesion 

figure 3). 

HoweverJ__pnrnf'fin w^v an<l_ 

BYK-S 740 are soluble in most 

film and therefore cannot reduce 

Figure 4: BYK-S 750. 

DCPD containing resins, vinyl ester resins and some isophthalic the evaporation of styrene from 

resins. Bggause of this solubility 

they are not able to form a surface 

15 30 45 60 

Time (min.) 

a 0.1% Paraffin wax 

B 1.0% BYK-S 740 

• without Additive 

Figure 5: Styrene emission of an orthophthalic resin with and without styrene 

suppressing additive. 

flflifl-OV' 

100 

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 

Time (min.i 

31.0% BYK-S 750 

01.0% BYK-S 740 

Q0.1% Paraffin wax 

• without Additive 

Figure 6: Styrene emission of DCPD-orthophthalic resin Mend with styrene suppressing 

additives. 

the resin. For these types of resin 

it was necessary to develop a less 

soluble emission suppressant 

(called BYK-S 750~) which is able 

to form a surface film. 

The BYK-S 750 additive works 

by forming very fine crystals on the 

resin's surface. Between these crystals an external polar component 

allows monomer from a second 

laminate to penetrate below the 

wax film, and this results in the 

required interlaminar adhesion 

(Figure 4). 

By using the right styrene 

suppressant it is possible to reduce 

emission during the curing phase 

of the reinforced plastic part 

(FRP) by up to 90%. Figures 5 

and 6 show the effectiveness of 

different additives at reducing 

styrene emission. 

In summary, to meet the required environmental and health 

and safety regulations to reduce the 

styrene monomer emission significantly a number of steps need to be 

taken: 

• working areas should be specially designed with air conditioning systems installed; 

• resins with a low styrene content should be used; 

• high workshop temperatures 

should be avoided; and 

• styrene emission suppressants 

should be used. '3 

Reinforced Plastics October 1997
# C_2004111EN.01000901.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3394 — Johnson & Johnson/Johnson & Johnson MSD Europe)

(2004/C 111/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 March 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page), |
| --- | --- |

—

as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page),

| — | in electronic form in the 'CEN' version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3394. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the 'CEN' version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3394. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

| EUR-OP, |
| --- |
| Information, Marketing and Public Relations, |
| 2, rue Mercier, |
| L-2985 Luxembourg |
| Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09. |

EUR-OP,

Information, Marketing and Public Relations,

2, rue Mercier,

L-2985 Luxembourg

Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6586]


Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to Central Government of 
Egypt

    Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, 
Pub. L. 111-8) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
section 7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of Egypt, 
and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 2, 2009.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-9039 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
r--6--6f 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0237

MATTHEW "MATT" OLDS,

 Plaintiff, Appellee and CrossAppellant,

 v.

MARK HUELSKAMP,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Shane Alexander MacIntyre, whose name appears 

next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments 

appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to 

conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this June 6, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Scott M. Stearns, Zachary Aaron Franz, Carey Schmidt, David C. Berkoff, Shane 

Alexander MacIntyre

06/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0237
Third Amendment to the Profit Participation Plan of Moody's Corporation



 Exhibit 10.46 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE PROFIT PARTICIPATION PLAN OF MOODY’S CORPORATION 
 A new Section 1.41A is added
to the Moody’s Corporation Profit Participation Plan (amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2007) is hereby amended to read as follows, effective as of December 31, 2011: 

“Spouse” shall mean the person to whom a Member is lawfully married within the meaning of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act. 

  

			
	MOODY’S 2011 10-K