alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THECOU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS A P - 75, 363
M A X A LE XA N D ER SO FFA R , A ppe l l ant

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS ON DI RE CT AP P EA L F ROM CAUS E N O. 3 1 9 7 2 4 I N T HE 2 3 2 ND DI S TR I CT COURT HA RRI S CO UNTY
K EASLE R , J. , f

i l e d a c onc ur r i ng o pi ni on i n w hi c h H ERVEY , J ., jo in e d . CO NC UR RI NG OP I NI ON I j o i n th e Cou rt ’ s o p i n i o n wi th th e e x c e p t i o n o f p o i n to f

e rr o rtwen ty - s e v e n. C on sist en t w i th m ydi s s ent i ng opi ni on t o the C ourt ’ s deci s i on t o i m pr ovi dent l ygr ant rehear i ng i n T

h o m p so n v . Sta te , I w o u ld h o ld tha t th ere w as n o erro r un d er M a i ne v.S O F F A R C O N C U R R IN G O P IN I O N —2

9 3 S
. W
. 3 d 2 6 9 , 2 7 6 (T e x . C rim . A p p . 2 0 0 3 ) (K e a sle r, J., dis se n tin g o n re h ’g ); s ee 1 al s o Sof f ar , 368 F. 3d at487 ( G arza J
. , di s s ent i ng) ( “A s Soffarm ade no i ncr i m i nat i ng s ta te m e n ts re g a rd in g h is m u rd e r c h a rg e du ri n g th e in te rr o g a tio n [ b yB o c k e l] , Moul ton , by its o w n te rm s , is in ap p lic ab le ). Moul ton . I further urge the m aj ori tyof the C ou rt t o recon si der i t s und ers t and i ng of thi s case

1
a n do th e r S up re m e C o u rtp re c e d e n t.

D A T E D E L I V E R E D : N ovember18, 2009 D O N O T PU BL I SH
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


REQUIRED BY RULE 13A - 14(B) OR RULE 15D - 14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. 1350






In connection with the amended Annual Report of Inova Technology Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the period ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report" ), I, Adam Radly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Adam RadlyAdam RadlyChief Executive OfficerApril 19, 2011
# EUR-Lex - 32004R1219 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R1219

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1219/2004 of 30 June 2004 fixing the production refund for olive oil used in the manufacture of certain preserved foods **

*
Official Journal L 232 , 30/06/2004 P. 0033 - 0033 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1219/2004 of 30 June 2004 fixing the production refund for olive oil used in the manufacture of certain preserved foods

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats(1), and in particular Article 20a thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 20a of Regulation No 136/66/EEC provides for the granting of a production refund for olive oil used in the preserving industry. Pursuant to paragraph 6 of that Article, and without prejudice to paragraph 3 thereof, the Commission shall fix this refund every two months.

(2) By virtue of Article 20a(2) of the abovementioned Regulation, the production refund must be fixed on the basis of the gap between prices on the world market and on the Community market, taking account of the import charge applicable to olive oil falling within CN subheading 15099000 and the factors used for fixing the export refunds for those olive oils during the reference period. It is appropriate to take as a reference period the two-month period preceding the beginning of the term of validity of the production refund.

(3) The application of the above criteria results in the refund being fixed as shown below,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the months of July and August 2004, the amount of the production refund referred to in Article 20a(2) of Regulation No 136/66/EEC shall be EUR 44,00/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2004 .

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2004 .

For the Commission

J. M. Silva Rodríguez

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ 172, 30.9.1966, p. 3025/66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1513/2001 (OJ L 201, 26.7.2001, p. 4).
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0210 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0210

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 210/2004 of 23 December 2003 establishing for 2004 the "Prodcom list" of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 **

*
Official Journal L 045 , 14/02/2004 P. 0001 - 0248 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 210/2004

of 23 December 2003

establishing for 2004 the "Prodcom list" of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 of 19 December 1991 on the establishment of a Community survey of industrial production(1), and in particular Article 2(6) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 requires Member States to carry out a Community survey of industrial production.

(2) The survey of industrial production must be based on a list of products identifying the industrial production to be surveyed.

(3) A list of products is necessary to permit alignment between production statistics and external trade statistics and to afford comparison with the Community product nomenclature (CPA).

(4) The list of products required by Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 and referred to as the "Prodcom list", is common to all Member States, and is necessary in order to compare data across Member States.

(5) The Prodcom list needs to be updated and it is therefore necessary to establish that list for 2004.

(6) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Statistical Programme Committee set up by Council Decision 89/382/EEC, Euratom(2),

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Prodcom list for 2004 shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall apply from 1 January 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 December 2003.

For the Commission

Pedro Solbes Mira

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 374, 31.12.1991, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

(2) OJ L 181, 28.6.1989, p. 47.

ANNEX

>TABLE>

@ = unit differsfrom CN unit.
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4



July 29, 2011




Travelport, LP

Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.

300 Galleria Parkway, N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30339





			
	Re:	 	Fourteenth Amendment to Subscriber Services Agreement, dated
as of July 23, 2007 (“Agreement”) between Travelport, LP, (“Travelport”), Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. (“TGDS” and, together with Travelport, collectively, “Galileo”) and Orbitz Worldwide, LLC (“Subscriber”)




Ladies and Gentlemen:



This letter constitutes a Fourteenth Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Agreement referenced above.
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall be used as defined in the
Agreement.



Effective as August 1, 2011, (“Amendment Effective Date”), Galileo and Subscriber hereby agree as
follows:



1. Custom Terms and Conditions Revision. The Custom Terms and Conditions Attachment
(Worldspan Services) — to the Agreement is amended as set forth in Exhibit A.



2. General. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the Parties hereto or their successors in interest, except as expressly provided in
the Agreement. Each Party to this Amendment agrees that, other than as expressly set out in this
Amendment, nothing in this Amendment is intended to alter the rights, duties and obligations of the
Parties under the Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby. In the
event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions
of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall govern. This Amendment may be
executed by the Parties in separate counterparts and each counterpart shall be deemed to be an
original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.







1









 







The Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by the signatures of their respective
authorized representatives.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Orbitz Worldwide, LLC	 	 	 	Travelport, LP	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	By: Travelport Holdings LLC as General Partner	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:

	 	/s/ Mike Nelson
	 	 	 	Signature:
	 	/s/ Daniel E. Westbrook	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Mike Nelson	 	 	 	Name:	 	Daniel E. Westbrook	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	President, Partner Services Group	 	 	 	Title:	 	V.P. Supplier Development	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	8/1/11	 	 	 	Date:	 	30 July 2011	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Signature:	 	/s/ Philip Emery	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	Philip Emery	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	Director	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Date:	 	29 July 2011	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 






2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3470 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3470

  To permanently extend the private mortgage insurance tax deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2012

Ms. Stabenow (for herself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To permanently extend the private mortgage insurance tax deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR MORTGAGE INSURANCE 
              PREMIUMS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 163(h)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or accrued after December 31, 2011, and to amounts 
properly allocable to periods after such date.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.10





CONSENT OF GRAHAM HOLMES



Reference is made to the technical report
entitled “Caspiche Project, Copiapo, Chile, NI 43-101 Technical Report Caspiche Pre-Feasibility Study” dated January
16, 2012, which contains certain scientific and technical information related to the Caspiche property of Exeter Resource Corporation
(the “Technical Report”).



I hereby consent to the inclusion of references
to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Exeter
Resource Corporation, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



Dated this 1st day of April,
2013.



|/s/ Graham Holmes             | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Name:  Graham Holmes, P. Eng. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                             374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    15000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2544
<PP&E>                                           80987
<DEPRECIATION>                                   57005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   96212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            61180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         69105
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     96212
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25101
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 23588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    29
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 86 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 7
Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 86 Filed 04/25/22 Page 2 of 7
APRIL 25 2022

MICHAEL GOGAN

Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 86 Filed 04/25/22 Page 3 of 7
Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 86 Filed 04/25/22 Page 4 of 7
Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 86 Filed 04/25/22 Page 5 of 7
Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 86 Filed 04/25/22 Page 6 of 7
Case 19-20438-CLC Doc 86 Filed 04/25/22 Page 7 of 7
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Integrated sequence stratigraphy of the postimpact sediments from the Eyreville core holes, Chesapeake Bay impact structure inner basin      

      January 1, 2009    

The Eyreville core holes provide the first continuously cored record of postimpact sequences from within the deepest part of the central Chesapeake Bay impact crater. We analyzed the upper Eocene to Pliocene postimpact sediments from the Eyreville A and C core holes for lithology (semiquantitative measurements of grain size and composition), sequence stratigraphy, and chronostratigraphy. Age is based primarily on Sr isotope stratigraphy supplemented by biostratigraphy (dinocysts, nannofossils, and planktonic foraminifers); age resolution is approximately ±0.5 Ma for early Miocene sequences and approximately ±1.0 Ma for younger and older sequences. Eocene–lower Miocene sequences are subtle, upper middle to lower upper Miocene sequences are more clearly distinguished, and upper Miocene–Pliocene sequences display a distinct facies pattern within sequences. We recognize two upper Eocene, two Oligocene, nine Miocene, three Pliocene, and one Pleistocene sequence and correlate them with those in New Jersey and Delaware. The upper Eocene through Pleistocene strata at Eyreville record changes from: (1) rapidly deposited, extremely fine-grained Eocene strata that probably represent two sequences deposited in a deep (>200 m) basin; to (2) highly dissected Oligocene (two very thin sequences) to lower Miocene (three thin sequences) with a long hiatus; to (3) a thick, rapidly deposited (43–73 m/Ma), very fine-grained, biosiliceous middle Miocene (16.5–14 Ma) section divided into three sequences (V5–V3) deposited in middle neritic paleoenvironments; to (4) a 4.5-Ma-long hiatus (12.8–8.3 Ma); to (5) sandy, shelly upper Miocene to Pliocene strata (8.3–2.0 Ma) divided into six sequences deposited in shelf and shoreface environments; and, last, to (6) a sandy middle Pleistocene paralic sequence (~400 ka). The Eyreville cores thus record the filling of a deep impact-generated basin where the timing of sequence boundaries is heavily influenced by eustasy.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Lucy Edwards

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

leedward@usgs.gov

703-648-5272

## Related Content

#### Lucy Edwards

##### Scientist Emeritus

Florence Bascom Geoscience Center

leedward@usgs.gov

703-648-5272

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Florence Bascom Geoscience Center          

12201 Sunrise Valley DriveReston, VA20192United States

703-648-5953

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Chesapeake Bay

View All **
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc. as Managing Member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC, certify that (i) he Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of
TriView Global Fund, LLC fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of TriView Global Fund, LLC.

TRIVIEW GLOBAL FUND, LLC
By:	TriView Capital Management, Inc., Managing Member

By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 30, 2011

<page>
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 333 

AN ACT 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving the Little 

Wood River Ranch. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 333 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN3 VOLVING LITTLE WOOD RIVER RANCH. 

4 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

5 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

6 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com7 mission project numbered 12063, the Federal Energy 

8 Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the li9 censee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in 

10 accordance with the procedures of the Commission under 

11 that section— 

12 (1) extend the time period during which the li13 censee is required to commence the construction of 

14 project works to the end of the 3-year period begin15 ning on the date of enactment of this Act; or 

16 (2) if the license for Project No. 12063 has 

17 been terminated, reinstate the license and extend the 

18 time period during which the licensee is required to 

19 commence the construction of project works to the 

20 end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of en21 actment of this Act. 

Passed the Senate October 18, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 333 

AN ACT 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commenceinvolving the Little Wood River Ranch. ment of construction of a hydroelectric project
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 06-0544

IN RE PETITION OF RACHEL PARKIN FOR

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE

BAR OF MONTANA

FILED

JUL 2 0 2021

Bowen C3reenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

Tritymyta na

Rachel Parkin has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the State

Bar of Montana. Parkin was placed on inactive status on July 12, 2021, for failing to

comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending

March 31, 2021. Parkin has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Parkin has

now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year, in accordance with Rule 13

of the CLE Rules. The Petition states that Parkin is not currently subject to disciplinary

proceedings and has not cornrnitted any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules of

Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Rachel Parkin for reinstatement to

active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining

dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar of Montana, Parkin shall be reinstated.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar of Montana'

DATED this day of July, 2021.

Chief Just'

(76

07/20/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544
/94 in AUL

Justices

7
Case 19-20094-AJC Doc 22 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-20094-AJC Doc 22 Filed 11/04/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 19-20094-AJC Doc 22 Filed 11/04/19 Page 3 of 3