alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 3472 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To amend the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 to provide 

improvements to such Act. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Uninterrupted Scholars Act 

(USA)’’. 

SEC. 2. FAMILY EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVACY. 

Section 444(b) of the General Education Provisions Act (20 

U.S.C. 1232g(b)) (commonly known as the ‘‘Family Educational 

Rights and Privacy Act of 1974’’) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) in subparagraph (J)(ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ after the 

semicolon at the end; 

(B) in subparagraph (K)(ii), by striking the period at 

the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(C) by inserting after subparagraph (K), the following: 

‘‘(L) an agency caseworker or other representative of a 

State or local child welfare agency, or tribal organization (as 

defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)), who has the right 

to access a student’s case plan, as defined and determined 

by the State or tribal organization, when such agency or 

organization is legally responsible, in accordance with State 

or tribal law, for the care and protection of the student, provided 

that the education records, or the personally identifiable 

information contained in such records, of the student will not 

be disclosed by such agency or organization, except to an individual or entity engaged in addressing the student’s education 

needs and authorized by such agency or organization to receive 

such disclosure and such disclosure is consistent with the State 

or tribal laws applicable to protecting the confidentiality of 

a student’s education records.’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ‘‘, except when a parent 

is a party to a court proceeding involving child abuse and 

neglect (as defined in section 3 of the Child Abuse Prevention 

and Treatment Act (42 U.S.C. 5101 note)) or dependency matters, and the order is issued in the context of that proceeding, 

additional notice to the parent by the educational agency or 
S. 3472—2 

institution is not required’’ after ‘‘educational institution or 

agency’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Case 19-19586-CLC    Doc 27    Filed 10/05/19    Page 1 of 3

Case 19-19586-CLC    Doc 27    Filed 10/05/19    Page 2 of 3

Case 19-19586-CLC    Doc 27    Filed 10/05/19    Page 3 of 3
RECORD OF COMMUNICATION

TELEPHONE CALL

DATE: August 1, 2012

SUBJECT: California DOGGR

- Reinjection standards for produced water

FROM: Nicole Law

– EPA Region IX, Rules Office

TO: Steve Fields

– California Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources

, District 2

( 805 ) 6 54

- 4761

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION:

1. There are no federal standards for VOC content in reinjected wastewater.

2. The state standards for reinjection are for hazardous materials.

3

. Oil production fluid is exempt under federal (RCRA) requirements.

4. The Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources has reinjection standards for TDS (total

dissolved solids)

.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3109 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3109

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 
 3,3'-[carbonylbis(imino-4,1-phenylene-2,1-diazenediyl)]bis[4-amino-5-
           hydroxy-6-(2-phenyldiazenyl)-, sodium salt (1:4).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 
 3,3'-[carbonylbis(imino-4,1-phenylene-2,1-diazenediyl)]bis[4-amino-5-
           hydroxy-6-(2-phenyldiazenyl)-, sodium salt (1:4).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 3,3'-[CARBONYLBIS(IMINO-4,1-
              PHENYLENE-2,1-DIAZENEDIYL)]BIS[4-AMINO-5-HYDROXY-6-(2-
              PHENYLDIAZENYL)-, SODIUM SALT (1:4).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2,7-                Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Naphthalenedisulf                                                  31/2015.......
                        onic acid, 3,3'-
                        [carbonylbis(imin
                        o-4,1-phenylene-
                        2,1-
                        diazenediyl)]bis[
                        4-amino-5-hydroxy-
                        6-(2-
                        phenyldiazenyl)-,
                        sodium salt (1:4)
                        (CAS No. 59262-64-
                        5) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3204.14.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Dr. Robert M. Summers, Secretary Maryland Department ofthe Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21230 Dear Dr. Summers: 

### JUL 1 B 2011

On May 17, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department ofthe Environmentpertainingto the Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) and pre-construction permitting requirements for Electric Generating Units. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, theymay direct them to Mr. David Talley, Office ofPermits and AirToxics, at (215) 814-2117. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely,

Diana Esher, Director AirProtection Division

CustomerServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19597-19598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 10, 2009, Penick 
Corporation, 33 Industrial Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed in schedule II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine (9041).............................   II
Codeine (9050).............................   II
Dihydrocodeine (9120)......................   II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................   II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................   II
Diphenoxylate (9170).......................   II
Ecgonine (9180)............................   II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................   II
Morphine (9300)............................   II

[[Page 19598]]

 
Oripavine (9330)...........................   II
Thebaine (9333)............................  II
Oxymorphone (9652).........................   II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
as bulk controlled substance intermediates for distribution to its 
customers for further manufacture or to manufacture pharmaceutical 
dosage forms.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 
1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than June 29, 2009.

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9803 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# L_2005097EN.01006401.xml

| 15.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 97/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 97/64

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 143 of 30 April 2004
  )

On page 24, in Article 33, first subparagraph:

for:

‘This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 January 2004.’,

read:

‘This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 January 2005.’

---
# C_2004174EN.01001101.xml

| 6.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3456 — GOLDMAN SACHS / TITAN)

(2004/C 174/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 16 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3456. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3456. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**TIMOTHY ANDREW HORAN,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 436 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7th day of October, 2015, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

In re: 

VERNELL ROBINSON CASE NO.: 19-18883-RAM

CHAPTER: 7

Debtor.

__________________________/

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION TO CLAIM NUMBER 1-1

Creditor, TD Bank, USA by American InfoSource as agent (“Creditor”), files its 

Response to the Objection to Claim Number 1-1 (Doc. No. 44) (“Debtor’s Objection”) and 

states:

1. Creditor filed Proof of Claim Number 1-1 on March 12, 2020 and Amended Proof 

of Claim Number 1-2 on March 25, 2020.

2. Creditor affirms the amount stated in its claim, specifically $2,982.00. 

3. Moreover, the claim is prima facie evidence of the debt at the time of the filing of 

the case, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3001(f).

4. The Debtor’s Objection seeks to disallow Proof of Claim Number 1-1, ostensibly, 

based on a constitutional argument regarding exemptions of certain assets of the Debtor. 

5. The Debtor’s Objection does not substantively address Creditor’s claim, nor does

it list any reason under 11 U.S.C.§502(b), as to why it would not be an enforceable claim on its 

face, an argument that Creditor would oppose if raised. 

6. Additionally, the Debtor did not offer any evidence to rebut the amount stated in 

the claim and therefore has not met his burden of proof. In re MacFarland, 462 B.R. 857, 880

(Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2011) (“The burden of proof is on the objecting party to provide evidence 

surpassing the evidence set forth in the claim.”). 

Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 55 Filed 04/03/20 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

7. Accordingly, Debtor’s Objection should be summarily overruled. 

WHEREFORE, Creditor, TD Bank, USA by American InfoSource as agent, respectfully 

requests the Court overrule the Debtor’s Objection to Claim Number 1-1, allow Creditor’s Proof 

of Claim Numbers 1-1 and 1-2 as filed and for such other and further relief as the Court deems 

appropriate.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

Florida Bar Number 52899

P.O. Box 5703

Clearwater, FL 33758

P: (727) 565-2653

F: (727) 213-9022

E: bk@stewartlegalgroup.com

Counsel for Creditor

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by CM/ECF 

notice and regular mail this 3rd day of April 2020.

/s/ Gavin N. Stewart

Gavin N. Stewart, Esquire

VIA REGULAR MAIL

Vernell Robinson 

2031 NW 194th Ter 

Miami Gardens, FL 33056-2746 

VIA CM/ECF NOTICE

Lawrence M Shoot, Esq 

4830 SW 92 Ave 

Miami, FL 33165 

Trustee

Barry E Mukamal 

PO Box 14183 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33302 

Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 55 Filed 04/03/20 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Christian Somodevilla 

LSAS Attorneys 

2 S. Biscayne Boulevard 

Suite 2300 

Miami, FL 33131 

U.S. Trustee

Office of the US Trustee 

51 S.W. 1st Ave. 

Suite 1204 

Miami, FL 33130

Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 55 Filed 04/03/20 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Horace J. Davis III
-------------------------------------
Horace J. Davis III
November 14, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Z-Tel
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by the Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2004209EN.01002701.xml

| 11.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 209/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/27

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1099/2004

of 10 June 2004

fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004 of 19 May 2004 on a special intervention measure for oats in Finland and Sweden (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland or Sweden to all third countries with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 4 to 10 June 2004, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004, the maximum refund on exportation of oats shall be EUR 23,60/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 28.

3

---
# C_2004111EN.01000701.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3337 - Best Agrifund/Nordfleisch)

(2004/C 111/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 March 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office of Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page). |
| --- | --- |

—

as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office of Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page).

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3337. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law; |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3337. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law;

for more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

| EUR-OP, |
| --- |
| Information, Marketing and Public Relations (OP/4B) |
| 2, rue Mercier |
| L-2985 LUXEMBOURG |
| telephone: +352-2929 424 55, fax: +352-2929 427 63 |

EUR-OP,

Information, Marketing and Public Relations (OP/4B)

2, rue Mercier

L-2985 LUXEMBOURG

telephone: +352-2929 424 55, fax: +352-2929 427 63

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2930 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2930

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on dodecahydro-
                3a,6,6,9atetramethylnaphtho(2,1-b)furan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on dodecahydro-
                3a,6,6,9atetramethylnaphtho(2,1-b)furan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DODECAHYDRO-3A,6,6,9ATETRAMETHYL-NAPHTHO(2,1-B)FURAN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.27 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to dodecahydro-
3a,6,6,9atetramethylnaphtho(2,1-b)furan) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```