alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NUMBER S 13
- 2 2
- 00 3 6 1
- C R

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ VICTOR HERNANDEZ A/K/A VICTOR HERNANDEZ JR. , A ppellant ,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 156 th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva
Appellant filed a notice of appeal attempt ing to appeal final judgment s in trial court

case number LCR210044

. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Upon review of the documents filed, t he trial court has certified that this “is a plea

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” without permission of the Court

.2 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). On August 4 , 202 2 , th e Court ordered appellant’s counsel

to review the record and determine whether appellant had a right to appeal. In response, appellant’s counsel filed a letter indicating appellant plead guilt y and waived his right to
appeal

. Appellant’s counsel also indicated appellant was provided admonishments before
signing th e waiver of rights , the judicial confession and stipulation, and the appeal certification of right to appeal which indicated he would have no right to appeal.

The Tex as Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly
, this appeal i s dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

CLARISSA SILVA Justice
Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 18th day of August , 202 2

.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19598-19599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 11, 2009, AMRI 
Rensselaer, Inc., 33 Riverside

[[Page 19599]]

Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, made application by renewal to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana (7360)...........................   I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............   I
Amphetamine (1100).........................   II
Lisdexamfetamine (1205)....................   II
Methylphenidate (1724).....................   II
Pentobarbital (2270).......................   II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................   II
Meperidine (9230)..........................   II
Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage form)    II
 (9273).
Oxymorphone (9652).........................   II
Fentanyl (9801)............................   II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture bulk controlled substances for use 
in product development and for distribution to its customers.
    In reference to drug code 7360 (Marihuana), the company plans to 
bulk manufacture cannabidiol as a synthetic intermediate. This 
controlled substance will be further synthesized to bulk manufacture a 
synthetic THC (7370). No other activity for this drug code is 
authorized for this registration.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than June 29, 2009.

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9799 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

In re: Case No. 19-14871-EPK

JILL ANNE TACIK, Chapter 13

Debtor.

______________________________________/

JILL ANNE TACIK

Plaintiff,

v. Adv. Proc. No. 19-01156-EPK

6322 SEVEN SPRINGS TRUST C and

NERMINE HANNA,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF 

AS TO COUNT I OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

This matter came before the Court for hearing on November 19, 2020 upon the 

Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants as to Count I of the 

Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 63] filed by Jill Anne Tacik (the “Plaintiff”). For the 

Erik P. Kimball, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 20, 2020.

Case 19-01156-EPK Doc 86 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

reasons stated on the record at the hearing, the Court hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES that

the Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants as to Count I of 

the Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 63] is GRANTED.

###

Copies to: 

Brian K. McMahon, Esq.

Brian K. McMahon, Esq. shall serve a copy of this order on all parties in interest and file a 

certificate of service with the Clerk of Court.

Case 19-01156-EPK Doc 86 Filed 11/23/20 Page 2 of 2
# C_2004299EN.01000201.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3419 — ADECCO/MANPOWER/VEDIORBIS/JV)

(2004/C 299/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 5 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CFR’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3419. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CFR’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3419. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0659 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0659

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 659/2004 of 7 April 2004 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 concerning the selection of returning holdings for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings **

*
Official Journal L 104 , 08/04/2004 P. 0095 - 0096 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 659/2004

of 7 April 2004

amending Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 concerning the selection of returning holdings for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community(1), and in particular Articles 4(4), 5(5) and 6(2) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) By Commission Regulation (EC) No 660/2004 of 7 April 2004 amending the Annex to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC as regards the list of divisions(2), in that Annex, the single division "Belgium" has been split in three divisions. The numbers of returning holdings per division in Belgium should therefore be introduced in Annex I to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82(3).

(2) The development of data delivery and control procedures has made the report on the implementation of the selection plan for returning holdings referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 obsolete. Article 6 and Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 should therefore be deleted.

(3) Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 is amended as follows:

1. Article 6 is deleted;

2. Annex I is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation;

3. Annex II is deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from the 2004 accounting year.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 April 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859/65. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2059/2003 (OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 1).

(2) See page 97 of this Official Journal.

(3) OJ L 205, 13.7.1982, p 40. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1555/2001 (OJ L 205, 31.7.2001, p. 21).

ANNEX

In Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82, the line concerning Belgium is replaced by the following:

">TABLE>"
Exhibit
      32





**INVESTMENT
      ASSOCIATES INC.**


A
      Nevada
      Corporation





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
      undersigned, Steve Khan, Chief Executive Officer and Robert Hemmerling, Chief
      Financial Officer of Investment Associates Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1.
            the
                annual report on Form 10-KSB of Investment Associates Inc. for the
                period
                ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act of
                1934; and





2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Investment
                Associates Inc.










December
        21,
        2006 /s/Steven
        Khan
 Date       Steve
        Khan,
 Chief
        Executive Officer





December
        21,
        2006 /s/Robert
        Hemmerling
 Date       Robert
        Hemmerling,
 Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re

Brenda Lee Wade-Lester 

CHAPTER 13

CASE NO. 19-17977-SMG

Debtor(s)

______________________________/

RESPONSE BY U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE OF

TIKI SERIES IV TRUST TO DEBTOR(S)' OBJECTION TO CLAIM

U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE OF TIKI SERIES IV

TRUST ("Creditor"), responds to the Objection to Claim filed by the Debtor1 and states:

1. On November 1, 2019, Creditor filed its Proof of Claim (Claim No. 5-1) for the

prepetition mortgage debt owed by the Debtor. The Claim sets forth a total secured Claim

amount of $157,743.97 and an arrearage amount of $38,347.88.

2. The Debtor filed an Objection to Creditor’s Claim No. 5-1 on January 22, 2020, 

(Doc. No. 83) stating that Proof of Claim includes attorney’s fees in the amount of $9,196.08 that

were not substantiated with invoices itemizing same. Debtor requested a breakdown of the legal

fees and, if not provided, asked that the arrears amount be reduced to $33,253.30.

3. Contrary to the Debtor’s Objection, the total amount of pre-petition fees is 

$9,189.23 and encompasses not only attorney’s fees, but also late charges, property inspection

fees, and appraisal fees and costs. Additionally, Creditor has provided counsel for the Debtor with 

invoices for the attorneys fees that are itemized in the Proof of Claim as requested. Creditor does

note that there are $871.00 in remaining invoices that Creditor is attempting to obtain from the

prior loan servicer and will provide those to counsel for the Debtor upon receipt. 

4. Creditor respectfully requests that this matter be continued to allow time to obtain

the outstanding invoices. 

Case 19-17977-SMG Doc 91 Filed 02/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Certification as to Admission to the Southern District Bar

I hereby certify that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida, and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice

in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

I hereby certify that if the above is a matter requiring a hearing rather than negative notice,

I have attempted to resolve the disputes involved with opposing parties prior to requesting any

hearing on the above Motion.

/s/ Jessica Hicks 

Jessica Hicks

Kass Shuler, P.A.

P.O. Box 800

Tampa, FL 33601

Phone: (813) 229-0900 Ext. 1465

Fax: (813) 229-3323

jhicks@kasslaw.com

Florida Bar No. 1003462

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished on

February 11, 2020, by U.S. Mail and/or electronic mail via CM/ECF to: Brenda Lee Wade-Lester,

3519 NW 32 Street, Lauderdale Lakes, FL 33309; Matis H Abarbanel, Esq., 2150 S. Andrews

Avenue 2nd Floor, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316; Robin R. Weiner, Trustee P.O. Box 559007, Ft.

Lauderdale, FL 33355.

/s/ Jessica Hicks 

Jessica Hicks (x1465)

1911506/mlh

Case 19-17977-SMG Doc 91 Filed 02/11/20 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Hemmerling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Eye Catching Marketing Corp., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Eye Catching Marketing Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.









January 12, 2006

/s/ Robert Hemmerling

Date

Robert Hemmerling,

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Payment Data Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 30, 2007



| |     |                            
| | --- | ---------------------------
| | By: | /s/ Michael R. Long        
| |     | Michael R. Long            
| |     | Chief Executive Officer    
| |     | and Chief Financial Officer
Amendment to Morgan Stanley 401(k) Savings Plan, dated as of December 23, 2011



 EXHIBIT 10.9 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN 

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (the “Company”) hereby amends the Morgan Stanley 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”)
as follows: 
 1. Effective January 1, 2012, Section 20(a) of the Plan, Inalienability of Rights, shall be, and hereby
is, amended by adding the following at the end thereof: 
 “Effective January 1, 2012, in the event a domestic
relations order is submitted for determination of its status as a QDRO in accordance with this Section 20(a), a ‘QDRO determination fee’ of $750 shall be assessed and allocated among the Participant’s and the alternate
payee’s interests under the Plan as follows: 
 “(1) As provided in such QDRO, or, if not specified; 

“(2) If 100% of the Participant’s Account is assigned to the alternate payee, against the interest assigned to the alternate
payee; or 
 “(3) If any portion less than 100% of the Participant’s Account is assigned to the alternate payee,
evenly between the Participant and the alternate payee.” 
 2. Effective at the end of December 31, 2011, Supplement
B, Participants Residing in Puerto Rico, shall be, and hereby is, amended by adding the following to the end of Section 7, Amendment and Termination of This Supplement, thereof: 

“(c) Cessation of Participation of Puerto Rico Employees. Notwithstanding anything in this Supplement B to the contrary,
effective at the end of December 31, 2011 no Puerto Rico Participant shall be entitled or permitted to make or receive any Pre-Tax Contributions, Catch-Up Contributions, Company Contributions or other contributions or allocations with respect
to any Plan Year that commences on or after January 1, 2012. Any amounts held in the Plan attributable to periods prior to January 1, 2012 shall continue to be administered subject to the provisions of the Plan.” 

* * * * * * * * * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed
on its behalf as of this 23rd day of December, 2011.

  

			
	MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ JEFF BRODSKY
	Title:	 	Global Head of Human Resources



  
 2