alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9511]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Time and Place: Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will 
be held at EX-IM Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

Open Agenda Items: Item No. 1: Resolution presented to Linda M. Conlin, 
Vice Chairperson and 1st Vice President upon her resignation.

Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation 
for Item No. 1 only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Tele. No. 202-565-3957).

Kamil P. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-9511 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
# C_2004304EN.01000201.xml

| 8.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3439 — AGFA-GEVAERT/LASTRA)

(2004/C 304/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 August 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3439. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3439. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3451 

To exempt certain air taxi services from taxes on transportation by air. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2012 

Mr. BEGICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To exempt certain air taxi services from taxes on 

transportation by air. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN AIR TAXI SERVICES 

4 FROM TAXES ON TRANSPORTATION BY AIR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4281 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(irrespective of intermittent 

8 stops to view an attraction) or an on-demand flight 

9 to or from an area not connected by paved roads to 

10 any airport’’ after ‘‘sightseeing’’, and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3451 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen2 tence: ‘‘For purposes of the preceding sentence, the 

3 term ‘on-demand flight’ means any flight for which 

4 the departure time, departure location, and arrival 

5 location are specifically negotiated with the cus6 tomer.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxes imposed before, on, or 

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act, but only to 

10 the extent such taxes have not been paid before such date. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3173 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3173

To allow funds under title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
    Act of 1965 to be used to provide training to school personnel 
             regarding how to recognize child sexual abuse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2012

     Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Kyl, Mrs. Hutchison, and Mr. 
  Lautenberg) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow funds under title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
    Act of 1965 to be used to provide training to school personnel 
             regarding how to recognize child sexual abuse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helping Schools Protect Our Children 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. TRAINING TEACHERS TO RECOGNIZE CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE.

    (a) State Activities.--Section 2113(c) of the Elementary and 
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6613(c)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(19) Providing training for all school personnel, 
        including teachers, principals, and pupil services personnel, 
        regarding how to recognize child sexual abuse.''.
    (b) Local Educational Agency Activities.--Section 2123(a) of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6623(a)) is 
amended by inserting after paragraph (8) the following:
            ``(9) Providing training for all school personnel, 
        including teachers, principals, and pupil services personnel, 
        regarding how to recognize child sexual abuse.''.
    (c) Eligible Partnership Activities.--Subpart III of part A of 
title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 6631 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 2132(a), by striking ``the activities'' and 
        inserting ``activities''; and
            (2) in section 2134(a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) providing training for school personnel, including 
        teachers, principals, and pupil services personnel, regarding 
        how to recognize child sexual abuse.''.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of SaVi Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg Sweeney,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      SaVi Media Group, Inc. and will be retained by SaVi Media Group, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                August 20, 2007
            By:
                */s/ GREG SWEENEY*Greg
                SweeneyChief
                Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3230 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3230

To require issuers of long term care insurance to establish third-party 
                 review processes for disputed claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2012

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require issuers of long term care insurance to establish third-party 
                 review processes for disputed claims.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Long Term Care Insurance Integrity 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. LONG TERM CARE INSURANCE DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW PROCESS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 
insurance issuer that offers a long term care insurance plan shall 
develop and implement claims dispute resolution procedures that comply 
with the requirements of this section that shall be applicable to such 
plan.
    (b) Requirement.--A claims dispute resolution procedure under 
subsection (a) shall--
            (1) be designed to expeditiously resolve disputes 
        concerning claims under the plan involved;
            (2) with respect to such disputes, provide for the 
        application of one or more alternative means of dispute 
        resolution involving independent third-party review under 
        appropriate circumstances by entities that are mutually 
        acceptable to the issuer and the enrollee involved, with the 
        decision of such reviewer being binding on the issuer; and
            (3) ensure that an enrollee is eligible to obtain claims 
        review only to the extent and in the manner provided for in the 
        applicable insurance contract.
    (c) Appeals.--An enrollee may appeal the decision of an independent 
reviewer under subsection (b)(2) to an appropriate State court as 
provided for under State law.
    (d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to provide authority for an independent third-party reviewer 
under subsection (b)(2) to modify the terms of any long term care 
insurance contract.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-05-0336-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	AUGUST 23, 2006

			______________________________

	ROBERT E. LANG, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2004-405489; HONORABLE BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant was convicted after a jury trial of the offense of murder and was sentenced, by the same jury, to a term of confinement for life in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  We affirm.

	Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw.  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967).  In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated.  Id. at 744- 45.  In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial court’s judgment.  Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this matter.  Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).  The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response.  Appellant has filed a response.

	By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an appeal.  We have reviewed these grounds and made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds which might support an appeal.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).  In addition, we have reviewed the ground raised in appellant’s response.  We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

	Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

		Mackey K. Hancock

							         Justice

Do not publish.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3050 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until June 30, 2012. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until June 

30, 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSUR4 ANCE PROGRAM. 

5 (a) PROGRAM EXTENSION.—Section 1319 of the Na6 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘the earlier of the date of the enact8 ment into law of an Act that specifically amends the date 

9 specified in this section or May 31, 2012’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘June 30, 2012’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3050 IS

1 (b) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of the National 

2 Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘the earlier of the date of the enact4 ment into law of an Act that specifically amends the date 

5 specified in this section or May 31, 2012’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘June 30, 2012’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,680

EX PARTE BRIAN TERRELL NORWOOD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 46594-C IN THE 89 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM WICHITA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Norwood v. State, No. 02-08-214-CR (Tex. App. – Fort Worth, April 23, 2009). 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court
2

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify

Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. 

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of

the Second Court of Appeals in Cause No. 02-08-214-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No.

46594-C from the 89 Judicial District Court of Wichita County. Applicant shall file his petition th

for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate

issues.

Delivered: November 9, 2011

Do not publish
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-0474

_____________________________

LACHLAN ROTSCHREK,

Appellant,

v.

RONNIE WOODALL, Warden, New 

River Correctional Institution,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.

David P. Kreider, Judge.

September 3, 2020

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss, filed July 1, 2020, is granted, 

and this appeal is dismissed as moot.

B.L. THOMAS, WINOKUR, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Lachlan Rotschrek, pro se, Appellant.

Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, 

Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             539,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      161,588
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 1,912,200
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               539,770
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,389
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (99,301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (99,301)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.050)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
### SERVE D AUGUS T 16 , 201 0 C TO ;

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTERO F 

### SYANGR O WEST , INC . FA A DOCKE T No . CP10NM000 5 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-062 2 ORDE RO F DISMISSA L O n Jul y 6 , 2010 , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (hereinafte r referre dt o a s "Complainant" ) file daComplaint . O n Jun e 17 , 2010 , Responden t Syangr o West , Inc . (hereinafte r

"Respondent" ) ha drequeste dahearing . O n Augus t 11 , 2010 , Responden t move dt o withdra w it s Reques t for Hearing , citin g settlement . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "A t an y tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , an agenc y attorne y ma y withdra w acomplain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t fo r ahearin g withou t th e consen t

o f th e administrativ e la w judge . I f an agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r apart y withdraw s th e reques t fo r ahearin g an dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpart with prejudice. " WHEREFORE , th e withi n file dWithdrawa l o f Reques t fo r Hearin g havin g bee n rea dan dconsidered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows : 1 . Respondent' s Withdrawa l o f Reques t for Hearin g b e an di s hereb y granted ; an d 2 . Thi s proceedin g b e an di s hereb y dismisse dwith prejudice .s o ORDERED . 

### Richar dC . Goodwin U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen

t - Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP05SW001 2 (Civil Penalt

y Action) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Hearin g Docke t Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Att : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m2014 '

ON E COP Y Alexande r

Anolik , Esq . 210 7 Van Nes s Ave. , Suit e 20 0 Sa n Francisco , C A 94109-257 2 TEL : (415)673-333 3 FAX : (415 ) 673-354 8 Stellamari s Williams , Esq . Safet y Enforcemen t

Branc h Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Region , ASW- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 Meacha mBlvd. , 6 E Fort Worth , TX 76137-000 7 TEL : (817)222-508 1 FAX : (817)222-509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 Roo m541 1 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 Seventh Street , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

(202 ) 366-2139 ; Lega l Assistan t 6-512 1 FAX : (202)366-753 6

' Servic e was by U.S . Mail . For servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Hearin g Docket, Federa

l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building

- Roo

m 2014 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Att : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3251 

To amend title 46, United States Code, with respect to Mille Lacs Lake, 

Minnesota, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2012 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. FRANKEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, with respect to 

Mille Lacs Lake, Minnesota, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mille Lacs Lake Free5 dom To Fish Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MILLE LACS LAKE. 

7 Section 4101(1) of title 46, United States Code, is 

8 amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: 

9 ‘‘(except that, for purposes of this section, the navigable 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3251 IS

1 waters of the United States shall be treated as not includ2 ing Mille Lacs Lake, Minnesota)’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS