alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00594-CV

Mary MATTHEWS,

Appellant

v.

OLD RIVER ROAD RV RESORT, LLC,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18372A

Honorable Robert R. Barton, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 15, 2019

DISMISSED

In its agreed motion to dismiss, Appellee Old River Road RV Resort, LLC accepts 

Appellant’s argument that under Glassdoor, Inc. v. Andra Group, LP, No. 17-0463, 2019 WL 

321934 (Tex. Jan. 25, 2019), the underlying case has become moot by the passage of time, and 

this appeal should be dismissed. 

The agreed motion is granted; this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 

43.2(f); Glassdoor, No. 17-0463, 2019 WL 321934, at *3.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 15.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-10232, 333-11320, 333-190509 and 333-213861 on Form F-3 of our reports dated 24 February 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements (before retrospectiveadjustments to the financial statement disclosures discussed in Note 46 to the consolidated financial statements) of Santander UK plc and subsidiaries, and to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 20-F of Santander UK plc for the year ended 31 December 2016. 

*/s/ DELOITTE LLP*

London, United Kingdom 

1 March, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1929

In re: LATHRONEA P. GRESHAM,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lathronea P. Gresham, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lathronea Gresham petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing 

the district court to reopen her employment discrimination action. We conclude that 

Gresham is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & 

Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a 

substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Gresham is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Order entered January 4, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00518-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL., Appellants

V.

LBJ/BROOKHAVEN INVESTORS, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-01518

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ December 29, 2021 unopposed motion for an 

extension of time to file a reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time 

to January 28, 2022.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
a10a57.htm




Exhibit 10(a)57







SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN


OF ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)







Certificate of Amendment







Amendment No. 2







THIS INSTRUMENT, executed this 15th day of December, 2011, but made effective January 27, 2011, constitutes the Second Amendment of the Supplemental Retirement Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) (the “Plan”).


 


All capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 2 shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan unless otherwise herein defined.


 


Pursuant to Section 10.01 of the Plan and in accordance with the Resolutions of the Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors adopted at its meeting of January 27, 2011, the last sentence of Plan Section 1.01 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term “Administrator” shall for Plan administrative purposes include the office of the senior-most System officer with responsibility for Human Resources and Administration, to whom the Personnel Committee has delegated the authority to act on its behalf with respect to all Plan administrative matters.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Personnel Committee has caused this Second Amendment to the Supplemental Retirement Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) to be executed by its duly authorized representative on the day, month, and year above set forth, but effective January 27, 2011.


 







 


ENTERGY CORPORATION


PERSONNEL COMMITTEE


through the undersigned duly authorized representative
















/s/ E. Renae Conley




E. Renae Conley


Executive Vice-President,


Human Resources and Administration
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    ss. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SulphCo, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Rudolf W.
Gunnerman, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Michael A. Abend, Interim Controller, Treasurer, and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Rudolf W. Gunnerman
-------------------------------
Rudolf W. Gunnerman
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer


August 16, 2004



/s/ Michael A. Abend
---------------------------
Michael A. Abend
Interim Controller, Treasurer, and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer

August 16, 2004

         This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In re the Matter of the

Personal Restraint Petition of

No. 48418-8-II

MICHAEL JAMES CANTY,

Petitioner.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

MAXA, J. — Michael Canty seeks relief from personal restraint imposed following his 

convictions in 2001 of indecent liberties, first degree burglary, and second degree robbery. He 

argues that his judgment and sentence is facially invalid because it gives him credit for 161 days 

served when he actually served 173 days. 

The State concedes that Canty’s judgment and sentence misstates the amount of credit for 

time served and states that he is entitled to credit for 184 days served. It further concedes that 

Canty’s judgment and sentence is facially invalid and is not subject to the time bar contained in 

RCW 10.73.090(1). The State asks that we remand Canty’s judgment and sentence for correction 

of the amount of credit for time served. 

We accept the concession and grant Canty’s personal restraint petition. We remand his 

judgment and sentence to the trial court to be corrected as described above. 

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

June 28, 2016
No. 48418-8-II

2

Canty also requests relief in the form of compelling the end of sentence review committee 

to change its narrative about his criminal history. This request is beyond the scope of this petition 

and is therefore denied.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, 

it is so ordered.

MAXA, J.

We concur:

BJORGEN, C.J.

SUTTON, J.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-36282 and No. 333-134275 on Form S-8 of Rome Bancorp, Inc. of our
report dated March 15, 2011 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Rome Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.

| |                        | 
| | ---------------------- | 
| | /s/ Crowe
 Horwath LLP | 
| |                        | 
| | Crowe
 Horwath LLP     | 

Cleveland,
Ohio
March 18, 2011

---
---

Exhibit 13.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Linux Gold Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the year ended February 28, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Linux Gold Corp. Richmond, BC, Canadaby: /s/ John G. RobertsonJune 28, 2010John G. RobertsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Monique van Oord, Chief Financial Officer of Linux Gold Corp.,
  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the
  year ended February 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
  78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  Linux Gold Corp.

Richmond, BC Canada

by: /s/ Monique van Oord

March 28, 2007

Monique van Oord 
  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold
  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---
Town Hall Meeting 

# Protecting Outdoor Workers Exposed to Ticks

Tom Delaney Director of Government Affairs



# PLANET The Professional Landcare NetworkTown Hall Meeting 

# PLANET

As PLANET members, we are the 

# industry that creates and maintains the in communities all across America.Town Hall Meeting 

## The Tick and Lyme disease survey

was done between March and May 2010 as a Zoomerang survey with 102 companies participating . Most 

## answering were companies in our OSHA PLANET

- STARS program which are concerned about safety in the work place.Town Hall MeetingTown Hall MeetingTown Hall MeetingTown Hall MeetingTown Hall MeetingTown Hall MeetingTown Hall Meeting Do your workers come in contact ticks while working in the landscape? Based on company location and CDC incidences by state. High is defined as over 6.6 incidence in 2008 per 100,000 populationTown Hall Meeting 

# Summary I think this definitely shows interest by our industry 

## especially in the states with high incidences. The landscape industry which has workers in jeopardy of tick exposure are potential partners to expand the network for 

## information sharing including their customers.Town Hall Meeting Tom Delaney Director of Government Affairs Professional Landcare Network

804 Cole Dr Lilburn, GA 30047 Phone: 770 - 925 -7113 E -Mail: tomdelaney@landcarenetwork.org www.landcarenetwork.org Headquarters: 950 Herndon Parkway, Suite 450 Herndon, VA 20170 (800) 395 -2522 (703) 736 - 9668 Fax The association of members who create and maintain the QUALITY OF LIFE in communities across America.Town Hall Meeting 

# Panel Questions 1. Based on you knowledge or experience of worker exposures to ticks, what can you share with the group on how workers can avoid their exposure? 

## 2. What are the best mechanisms to get that information out to workers?
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the date and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: March      14, 2008 |   |   | /s/      Tang Chien Chang              |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |   |   | Tang      Chien ChangChief      Executive Officer                                                       |
EX-10.1






AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR COMMITMENT INCREASE




THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT FOR COMMITMENT INCREASE (this “Agreement”), dated
as of November 1, 2011 is among CME GROUP INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”),
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (the “JPMorgan”), and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., in its capacity as
Administrative Agent (the “Administrative Agent”) under that certain Credit Agreement (as
amended, revised, modified, supplement or amended and restated from time to time, the “Credit
Agreement”; the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), dated as of
January 11, 2011, by and among the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Bank
of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and a Swing Line Lender.



This Agreement is made and delivered pursuant to Section 2.20(c) of the Credit
Agreement.



The Borrower hereby confirms its agreement to increase the MC Commitments in an amount equal
to $40,000,000 (the “Increase Amount”) in accordance with the terms of said Section
2.20 effective as of November 1, 2011 (the “Increase Effective Date”).



JPMorgan, an existing Lender under the Credit Agreement as of the date hereof, hereby confirms
and agrees that (i) as of the Increase Effective Date, its MC Commitment shall be increased by the
Increase Amount and it shall have all of the rights and be obligated to perform all of the
obligations of a Lender under the Credit Agreement with respect to the MC Commitment in an amount
equal to $50,000,000 (as such amount may from time to time be adjusted in accordance with the terms
of the Credit Agreement) and (ii) it has received such documents and information as it has deemed
appropriate to make its own credit and legal analysis and decision to enter into this Agreement and
increase its MC Commitment hereby.



This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and
their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, which together shall constitute one instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart
of a signature page of this Agreement by telecopy or electronic transmission shall be effective as
delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Agreement.



[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]




THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS EXECUTED, AND TO BE FULLY PERFORMED, IN SUCH STATE.




JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.




By: /s/ Brian H. Mittelstaedt

Name: Brian H. Mittelstaedt

Title: Vice President




ACKNOWLEDGED:



CME GROUP INC.



By: /s/ James A. Pribel

Name: James A. Pribel

Title: Treasurer

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

as Administrative Agent





By: /s/ Maryanne Fitzmaurice

Name: Maryanne Fitzmaurice

Title: Director
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                   EXHIBIT 21

             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VOLUME SERVICES AMERICA, INC.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                              JURISDICTION OF
                         SUBSIDIARY                            INCORPORATION
                         ----------                           ---------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Events Center Catering, Inc.................................  Wyoming
Service America Concessions Corporation.....................  Maryland
Service America Corporation.................................  Delaware
Service America Corporation of Wisconsin....................  Wisconsin
Service America of Texas, Inc...............................  Texas
Servo-Kansas, Inc...........................................  Kansas
Servomation, Inc............................................  Quebec, Canada
SVM of Texas, Inc...........................................  Texas
Volume Services, Inc........................................  Delaware
Volume Services, Inc........................................  Kansas
V.S.I. of Maryland, Inc.....................................  Maryland
</Table>

                                        65
-

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

IN RE: JILL TACIK CASE NO.: 19-14871-EPK

 CHAPTER 13 

 

 DEBTOR 

_______________________________/

JILL TACIK 

Plaintiff

Vs

6322 SEVEN SPRINGS TRUST C and ADV NO: 19-01156-EPK

NERMINE HANNA

Defendant

____________________________________/

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

and

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH

LOCAL RULE 9073-1(D)

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true Order Granting Agreed Motion To (I) Reset Deadline for 

Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and (II) Continue Hearing On: ([63] Renewed Motion for Summary 

Judgment). Hearing scheduled for 08/11/2020 at 01:00 PM by TELEPHONE through CourtSolutions [CP #69] 

was served electronically on July 24, 2020, 

CM/ECF

Robin R Weiner

ecf@ch13weiner.com, ecf2@ch13weiner.com

Office of the US Trustee

USTPRegion21.MM.ECF@usdoj.gov

Jordan L Rappaport, Esq on behalf of Defendant 6322 Seven Springs Trust C

office@rorlawfirm.com, 1678370420@filings.docketbird.com

Jordan L Rappaport, Esq on behalf of Defendant Nermine Hanna

office@rorlawfirm.com, 1678370420@filings.docketbird.com

Case 19-01156-EPK Doc 71 Filed 07/27/20 Page 1 of 2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to 

practice in this Court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A).

 I further certify that I have conferred with opposing counsel in an attempt to resolve these issues without a 

hearing.

Submitted by,

BRIAN K. MCMAHON PA

1401 Forum Way 6th Floor

West Palm Beach, FL. 33401

(561) 478-2500 Telephone

561) 478-3111 Facsimile

Email: briankmcmahon@gmail.com

By: /s/ Brian K. McMahon, Esq.

FBN: 853704

Case 19-01156-EPK Doc 71 Filed 07/27/20 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 15, 2009

s0512 

# Order

May 15, 2009

138713

_____________ _______________ _____________ In re AXZALIA MONET JERNAGIN, Minor.

_____________ _______________ _____________ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 138713 COA: 288098 Oakland CC Family Division: 07-732656-NA CARL FULBRIGHT, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 31, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  By:    |  /s/ Derek Ivany                          |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Derek Ivany                              |
|  Title: |  Principal Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  February 14, 2011                        |

|  By:    |  /s/ Victor Cantore                       |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Victor Cantore                           |
|  Title: |  Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  February 14, 2011                        |