alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

747 

KA 10-01083 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

TIMOTHY P. GRADY, SR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

JOHN E. TYO, SHORTSVILLE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

JASON L. COOK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PENN YAN (BARRY L. PORSCH OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Yates County Court (W. Patrick

Falvey, J.), entered March 17, 2010. The order determined that

defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender

Registration Act. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
# C_2004174EN.01000901.xml

| 6.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3455 — DEUTSCHE BP / OKTAN / ARAL WÄRME SERVICE)

(2004/C 174/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3455. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3455. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, NIMH/ARMY RFA Project.                    

*Date:*                         May 1, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         David I. Sommers, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6154, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-7861,                         *dsommers@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 10, 2009.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-8892 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 25, 2018

NO. 03-17-00481-CV

Republic Capital Group, LLC, Appellant

v.

Jason Roberts; Eden Farms Ltd.; Ashley & Jason Inc.; Zachary Potts; Northwoods 

Energy, LLC.; Chanan Corp.; George Atallah; and Saliba Family Trust, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on April 12, 2017. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
APPENDIX F

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTORVEHICLES

REGULATIONS,

15 NYCRR PART 79
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| By:    |  /s/ Jacov              Vaisman                                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  Jacov Vaisman                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   |  Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| By:    |  /s/ Dilip              Shrestha                           |
|   |  Dilip Shrestha                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   |  Chief              Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                        |

----
Order entered September 8 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00249
- CR JULIUS ERICK KNIGHT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Cou nty Criminal Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA
- 1651546
- A



### O RDER A review of this record shows the clerk’s record has not been filed. Therefore, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, the clerk’s record for cause no. 05

- 16

- 002 49

- CR (trial court no. MA

- 1651546

- A). The Court has before it appellant’s September 2, 2016 motion to abate the appeal to determine the status of the reporter’s record from the punishment phase. The motion notes that appellant has contacted Vicki Tuck about the record but, to date, no response has been given. Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether a reporter’s record of the punishment phase of trial exists. Specifically: • The trial court shall determine whether a record was made of the punishment proceeding in this case. If no record was made, the trial court shall determine whether therecording was waived. In addition, if no record was made, the trial co urt shall determine

whether punishment was based on an agreement with the State.

• If a recording was made, t he trial court shall determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the punishment phase in this cause; (2) the court re porter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentati on, and any orders, to this Court within T WENTY DAYS of the date of this order. The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or when the findings are receiv ed, whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3060-3061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-959]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2003-N-0103] (formerly Docket No. 2003N-0069)

Release of Task Force Report; Guidance for Industry and FDA: 
Interim Evidence-Based Ranking System for Scientific Data; Withdrawal 
of Guidance

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 3061]]

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal of the guidance entitled ``Guidance for Industry and FDA: 
Interim Evidence-Based Ranking System for Scientific Data'' that was 
issued on July 10, 2003.

DATES:  The withdrawal is effective January 16, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Paula R. Trumbo, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-830), Food and Drug Administration, 
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD, 20740, 301-436-2579.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41387), FDA announced the availability 
of a guidance entitled ``Guidance for Industry and FDA: Interim 
Evidence-Based Ranking System for Scientific Data.'' This guidance is 
being withdrawn because it is obsolete.

    Dated: January 13, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-959 Filed 1-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
```
Order entered May 17 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 00 095 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 00096 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 00097 - CR THOMAS LEE NIX , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 C ollin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 003 - 82321 - 10, 003 - 82323 - 10, 003 - 82324 - 10 

### O RDER On April 10, 2013, this Court ordered court reporter Marigay Black to file the reporter’s record by May 10, 2013. To date, Ms. Black has not filed the record, no r has she communicated with the Court regarding the status of the record. Accordingly, we ORDER Marigay Black, official court reporter of the County Court at Law No. 3, to file the reporter’s record by JUNE 3 , 2013

. No further extensions will be granted. If the record is not filed by the date specified, we will order that Marigay Black not sit as a court reporter until she files the record in these appeals.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Lanc e Baxter, Presiding Judge, County Court at Law No. 3; Marigay Black, official court reporter, County Court at Law No. 3 , and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3337

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Shawn Patrick Sweeney,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: November 30, 2016

Filed: December 8, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Sweeney directly appeals the sentence the district court imposed upon 1

revoking his supervised release. His revocation sentence is composed of six months

The HonorableRebecca Ebinger, United States DistrictJudge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.
in prison and thirty-sixmonths ofsupervised release. On appeal, Sweeney argues that

the sentence is unreasonable. In addition, his counsel has moved for leave to

withdraw.

Reviewing Sweeney’s revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion, see

United States v. Hum, 766 F.3d 925, 927 (8th Cir. 2014) (per curiam), we conclude

that the sentence is not unreasonable, as both the prison term and the supervisedrelease term are within statutory limitations, and the prison term is within the

applicable advisory Guidelines range, see United States v. Petrekis, 551 F.3d 822,

824 (8th Cir. 2009). We affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Planet411.com Inc. for the quarter                ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended December 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material                respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of Planet411.com                Inc. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Derek Ivany                                                               |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Derek                Ivany                                                                         |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  March                20, 2006                                                                      |
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Scott J. Davidson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|                        |  |        |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 25, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/    Scott J. Davidson                         
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Scott J. Davidson                                
|                        |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### Fw: EPA Response to OMB comments on Implementation provisions of the SO 2 NAAQS rule Lydia Wegman to: Tricia Crabtree 06/02/2010 06:50 PM

Lydia Wegman ----- Original Message ----- **From:** Lydia Wegman **Sent:** 05/27/2010 06:38 PM EDT **To:** "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb. eop.gov>; dmancini@omb.eop.gov **Subject:** Fw: EPA Response to OMB comments on Implementation provisions of the SO2 NAAQS rule I hope the file comes through this time. ----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/27/2010 06:37 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: James

_ A..

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov Cc: Mike Thrift/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin McLean/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Wallace/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Padmini Singh/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Sara Schneeberg/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Mathias/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman <wegman.lydia@epa.gov> Date: 05/27/2010 06:24 PM Subject: EPA Response to OMB comments on Implementation provisions of the SO2 NAAQS rule

Jim, Please find attached a redline/strikeout version of the first part of the implementation section which responds to the comments you sent me this morning. For the most part, we find that we are not able to accept your comments.
In response to your request on the last page that we take comment on the general approach, we believe that the overall approach is central to the way in which the final monitoring provisions are structured and thus to the final rule. Equally important, we believe we cannot request comment in the context of a final rule.
In addition, we do not want to state that we will be taking public comment on the modeling guidance. The states will be taking comment on the maintenance plans as they are developed and EPA will be taking comment on these plans once they are submitted to us. The way in which the states make use of our guidance in conducting their modeling will be subject to public comment at both the state and federal levels. Thus, there will be ample opportunities for public comment on the states' use of the modeling guidance we issue.

Other edits are included in this attachment as well.
If you have any questions, please call my cell phone. Thanks Jim.
Lydia
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 35 75

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Kas ib Tauh eedBil al ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff - App el la nt
v. IDS Pro pe rty Casu al ty Ins ur an ce Co m pa ny, (ori gi na ll y

na m edas P ro gr es si ve Hom e Owne rs & Aut o In su ran ce Co m pa ny) ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t - Ap pe ll ee Am eri pr is e Aut o & Hom e In su ran ce ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Eas te rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s - Li tt le Ro ck

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Sep te m

be r 24 , 20 18 Fi le d: Octo be r 16 , 20 18 [Publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re KELLY, E RICKS ON, andGRASZ, Cir cu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.In th is ci vi l rig ht s act io n br ou gh t un de r 42 U.S.C. § 19 81 , Kas ib Bi la l ap pe al s

fo ll owi ng th e di stric t co urt’s adve rs e gr an t of su m m ary jud gm en t. Upo n care fu l de 1 no vo rev ie w, se e W

ithe rs v. Dick ’s Sp or ti ng Goo ds , In c. , 63 6 F.3 d 95 8, 96 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 11 ), we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co urt di d no t err in gr an ti ng su m m ary jud gm en t an d we f in d n o o th er b as is forrev ers al
. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le D.P. Mar sh al l Jr ., Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e East ern 1 Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s. -2
-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2003-N-0103] (formerly Docket No. 2003N-0069)

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice; withdrawal.

      ( print page 3061)    

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the withdrawal of the guidance entitled “Guidance for Industry and FDA: Interim Evidence-Based Ranking System for Scientific Data” that was issued on July 10, 2003.

# DATES:

 The withdrawal is effective January 16, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Paula R. Trumbo, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-830), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD, 20740, 301-436-2579.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In a notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41387), FDA announced the availability of a guidance entitled “Guidance for Industry and FDA: Interim Evidence-Based Ranking System for Scientific Data.” This guidance is being withdrawn because it is obsolete.                

Dated: January 13, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-959 Filed 1-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S