alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005051EN.01002801.xml

| 24.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 51/28

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 124 of 27 April 2004
  )

Annex I, Amendments to the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities

New Annex XIII, Transitional measures applicable to officials of the Communities (Article 107a of the Staff Regulations)

On page 83, Article 13(2) first sentence

for:

for:

‘2.   By way of derogation from Article 12(3) and paragraph (1) of this Article, the institutions may recruit officials entrusted with lawyer-linguist duties at grade A*7 or AD 7 respectively who have been included in a list of suitable candidates resulting from a competition at LA 7 and LA 6 level or A*7 level before 1 May 2006.’,

read:

read:

‘2.   By way of derogation from Article 12(3) and paragraph (1) of this Article, the institutions may recruit officials entrusted with lawyer-linguist duties at grade A*7 or AD 7 respectively who have been included in a list of suitable candidates resulting from a competition at LA 7 and LA 6 level or A*6 level before 1 May 2006.’

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Canglobe International, Inc.
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2004,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
Spooner,  Treasurer/Secretary  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Charles Spooner
Charles Spooner
Director, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)


April 20, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel. Member SEP.                    

*Date:*                         May 1, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                              ( print page 19970)    

*Contact Person:*                         Jonathan Arias, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5170, MSC 7840, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-2406,                         *ariasj@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 20, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-9664 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Summary of ERCOT Meeting with EPA 7 - 9 - 15 ERCOT staff met with EPA staff and management on 7 - 9 - 15 to discuss their grid reliability report, submitted as a comment to our proposed Texas/OK FI P. They presented the material entitled, “Summary

of Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region,” which is a summary of the report they

submitted to us as a comment, entitled, “ Im pacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region ,” dated 12 - 16 - 15. The following topics were specifically discussed by

them during the meeting:

• ERCOT has a reserve margin of 13.75%, but this is only a target, since the grid is market driven. • ERCOT discussed various problems in integrating wind and solar electricit y, particularl y in tr ansmission. • Did not consider the potential impacts of the Luminant bankruptcy in its analy sis. • ERCOT stated that its PLEXOS model was primarily an economic model similar to I PM and reacted to the economic programming it was given. Stated it did not assume a reserve margin, unlike IP M. • ERCOT only

considered additional gas generating capacity that was already

under construction as of the time of the PLEXOS model run. Stated that it was likely more gas electricit y generating capacity would come on line than modeled. • Their protocols (rules) do not likely include the ability

to require “reliability

must run” to force units that may

shut down due to a regulatory burden to continue running. Could potentially

obtain that authority

from the PUC. • ERCOT confirmed th at PLEXOS assumed that scrubber upgrades and retrofits occurred +3 and +5 ye ars, respectively , after our final rule. • ERCOT stated that most coal - fired respondents to its survey stated they

would satisfy

MATS via DSIor fuel switching. • In response to an EPA question as to whether ERCOT considered whether additional capacity was available to replace the specific units covered under our proposed FIP, ERCOT stated that would require a power flow study . Such a study is different than the economic anal ys is it ran via PL EXOS and although likel y resource intensive, it would look into it. • In response to the last slide (attached separatel y), ERCOT stated that the “coal at risk” represented coal units PLEXOS identified that were subject to install controls, and not ne cessarily

expected to shut down. We understood this chart to represent a snapshot of existing and under construction vs expected growth.
Amendment to Employment Agreement of Robert A. Mason



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made August 22, 2011, by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and Robert A. Mason (the
“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement
effective as of January 1, 2011 as amended on January 6, 2003, January 28, 2004, January 1, 2005, February 12, 2007, December 31, 2009, June 15, 2010 and February 17, 2011
(collectively, the “Employment Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to further
amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the
sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Section 1(b) of the Employment Agreement
shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “The Employment Period shall commence as of January 1, 2002
(the “Effective Date”) and shall continue until the close of business on December 31, 2014.” 
 2.
Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to add the following: “Commencing on January 1, 2012, the Executive shall serve as the Chief Executive Officer.” 

3. The first sentence of Section 3(a) shall be amended to read as follows: 

“Effective January 1, 2012, the Executive’s Annual Base Salary (“Annual Base Salary”), payable on a bi-weekly
basis, shall be at the annual rate of not less than $600,000.” 
 4. Section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be
amended to add the following to the end of this section: 
 “Commencing on January 1, 2012, the Executive shall be paid
by the Corporation a cash bonus under the Valassis Communications, Inc. 2008 Senior Executives Semi-Annual Bonus Plan of up to 100% of the Annual Base Salary in accordance with the targets set by the Board and the Compensation/Stock Option Committee
of the Corporation (the “Committee”). Such bonus shall be paid promptly after the end of the applicable six-month period ended June 30 or December 31 when the Committee has determined that applicable targets have been met but in
no event later than 60 days after each June 30 and December 31. The Executive shall also be entitled to participate in any programs of the Corporation enabling employees to apply all or part of any bonus to the purchase of the
Corporation’s stock and receive matching grants.” 
 5. All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect. 
 6. This instrument, together with the Employment Agreement, contains the entire agreement of the
parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused
this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first written above. 
  

			
	VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Todd L. Wiseley         
		 	Name: Todd L. Wiseley, Esq.
		 	 Title: Secretary



  

	
	/s/ Robert A. Mason         
	Robert A. Mason
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7755

CARL X. GREGORY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District

Judge. (CA-04-266)

Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl X. Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Carl X. Gregory seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(l) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Gregory has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Frank Zhao, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sun New Media, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sun New Media, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e)and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report was being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        /s/ Frank Zhao   Frank Zhao, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary   Date: September 5, 2006
ex10-11d.htm


Exhibit 10.11D



SECOND AMENDMENT OF


JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION


EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT PROGRAM


PART II UNION HOURLY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT PLAN







WHEREAS, John Bean Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the John Bean Technologies Corporation Employees’ Retirement Program Part II Union Hourly Employees’ Retirement Plan (the “Plan”);







WHEREAS, the Company now deems it necessary and desirable to amend the Plan in certain respects;







WHEREAS, this Second Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of the amendment;







NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the powers reserved to the Company under Section 11.1 Plan Amendment or Termination of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended in the following respects:







·           Effective September 1, 2008, Section 1-6 of Supplemental 1 of the Plan is hereby amended to replace the last sentence thereto with the following which shall read as follows:







With respect to a Termination Date occurring on or after October 9, 2000, but before September 1, 2008, a Participant’s Normal Retirement Benefit shall be equal to the greater of the Prior Formula Accrued Benefit, if any, and the product of the benefit rate of $30.00 multiplied by the Participant’s Years of Credited Service.  With respect to a Termination Date occurring on or after September 1, 2008, a Participant’s Normal Retirement Benefit shall be equal to the greater of the Prior Formula Accrued Benefit, if any, and the product of the
benefit rate of $31.50 multiplied by the Participant’s Years of Credited Service.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by a duly authorized representative this _______ day of ________________, 2011.







JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION












By: __________________________________________________


Its: __________________________________________________
# C_2004174EN.01001301.xml

| 6.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3452 — APAX / PCM UITGEVERS)

(2004/C 174/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3452. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3452. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2657 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2657

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on macroporous ion-exchange 
       resin comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with 
                  divinylbenzene, thio functionalized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on macroporous ion-exchange 
       resin comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with 
                  divinylbenzene, thio functionalized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MACROPOROUS ION-EXCHANGE RESIN COMPRISING A COPOLYMER OF 
              STYRENE CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENZENE, THIO 
              FUNCTIONALIZED.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.30 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to macroporous ion-exchange 
resin comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with 
divinylbenzene, thio functionalized) is amended by striking the date in 
the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPOTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael J. Murry, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Principal Executive
Officer of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. (1) The Quarterly Report of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (14 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Merchants and
Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. /s/ Michael J. MurryName: Michael J. MurryTitle: Chairman of the Board of Directors and Principal Executive OfficerDate: November 9, 2004
 1