alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6984

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOE LEWIS BLACKWELL, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CR-96-109, CA-99-370-1)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe Lewis Blackwell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

May 16, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on May 17, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and

79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Joe Lewis Blackwell, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Blackwell, Nos. CR-96-109; CA-99-370-1

(M.D.N.C. May 17, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GFR  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Richard Pierce, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Richard Pierce
Richard Pierce
CEO, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 19, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

137808

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137808 COA: 287748 Genesee CC: 07-020621-FC MARIO ORLANDO GRAY, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Akbar H. Firdosy, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Infonet Services Corporation; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: August 11, 2003
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0576 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004D0576

**2004/576/EC: Council Decision of 29 April 2004 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation between the European Community and the State of Israel **

*
Official Journal L 261 , 06/08/2004 P. 0047 - 0047 *

Council Decision of 29 April 2004 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation between the European Community and the State of Israel (2004/576/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 170 thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(1),

Whereas:

(1) The Commission has negotiated, on behalf of the Community, the Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation with the State of Israel (hereinafter the Agreement).

(2) The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 10 June 2003 in Brussels, subject to its conclusion.

(3) The Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation between the European Community and the State of Israel is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement has already been published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

Article 2

The President of the Council shall, acting on behalf of the Community, give the notification provided for in Article 5 of the Agreement.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2004 .

For the Council

The President

M. Mc Dowell

(1) Opinion delivered on 11 March 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2) OJ L 154, 21.6.2003, p. 80.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 333 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of 

a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2011 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving the Little 

Wood River Ranch. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN5 VOLVING LITTLE WOOD RIVER RANCH. 

6 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

7 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

8 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com9 mission project numbered 12063, the Federal Energy 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 333 IS

1 Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the li2 censee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in 

3 accordance with the procedures of the Commission under 

4 that section— 

5 (1) extend the time period during which the li6 censee is required to commence the construction of 

7 project works to the end of the 3-year period begin8 ning on the date of enactment of this Act; or 

9 (2) if the license for Project No. 12063 has 

10 been terminated, reinstate the license and extend the 

11 time period during which the licensee is required to 

12 commence the construction of project works to the 

13 end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of en14 actment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# L_2004190EN.01000501.xml

| 28.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 190/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1028/2004

of 27 May 2004

determining the extent to which applications lodged in May 2004 for import licences for certain poultrymeat products under the regime provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 of 22 June 1994, laying down detailed rules for the application in the poultrymeat sector of the import arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat and certain other agricultural products (1) and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004 submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2004 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1431/94 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

---

(1)  
  OJ L 156, 23.6.1994, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24).

1

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004 | Total quantity available for the period 1 July to 30 September 2004
  (t) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1,48 | 1 775,00 |
| 2 | 1,52 | 1 275,00 |
| 3 | 1,52 | 825,00 |
| 4 | 1,82 | 450,00 |
| 5 | 3,72 | 175,00 |

Group No

Percentage of acceptance of import certificates submitted for the period 1 May to 30 June 2004

Total quantity available for the period 1 July to 30 September 2004

(t)

1

1,48

1 775,00

2

1,52

1 275,00

3

1,52

825,00

4

1,82

450,00

5

3,72

175,00

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# SUMMARY:

                        U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has submitted the following information collections to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification. Comments should be sent via e-mail to                         *Chad_A._Lallemand@omb.eop.gov*                         or fax to 202-395-7285. Copies of submission may be obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*OMB Number:*                     OMB 0412-0514.                

*Form Number:*                     N/A.                

*Title:*                     USAID Regulation 1—Rules and Procedures Applicable to Commodity Transactions Financed by USAID (22 CFR part 201).                

*Type of Submission:*                     Renewal of Information Collection.                

*Purpose:*                     The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) finances transactions under Commodity                           ( print page 19196)                        Import Programs and needs to assure that the transaction complies with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. In order to assure compliance and request refund when appropriate, information is required from host country importers, suppliers receiving USAID funds, and banks making payments for USAID.                

*Annual Reporting Burden:*

*Respondents:*                     20.                

*Total Annual Responses:*                     40.                

*Total Annual Hours Requested:*                     20 hours.                

Dated: April 16, 2009.

Sylvia Lankford,

Acting Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of Administrative Services, Bureau for Management.

[FR Doc. E9-9472 Filed 4-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3505 

To ensure the efficient use of taxpayer dollars in construction-related contracts for reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan by requiring reporting 

to Congress by Federal agencies that refuse to implement, or only partially concur with, SIGAR recommendations to seek reimbursement for 

failure by a contractor or subcontractor to successfully complete a contract due to poor contractor performance, cost overruns, or other reasons. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2012 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To ensure the efficient use of taxpayer dollars in construction-related contracts for reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan by requiring reporting to Congress by Federal 

agencies that refuse to implement, or only partially concur with, SIGAR recommendations to seek reimbursement for failure by a contractor or subcontractor to 

successfully complete a contract due to poor contractor 

performance, cost overruns, or other reasons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 3505 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Afghanistan Con3 tractor Accountability Act of 2012’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR FEDERAL AGEN5 CIES WITH CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS IN 

6 AFGHANISTAN THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH 

7 SIGAR RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING RE8 IMBURSEMENT FOR POOR CONTRACTOR 

9 PERFORMANCE, COST OVERRUNS, OR OTHER 

10 REASONS. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

12 end of the 60-day period for an audited executive agency 

13 to respond to a covered final audit report submitted to 

14 the agency by the Special Inspector General for Afghani15 stan Reconstruction, or 30 days after an executive agency 

16 responds to a covered audit report with a non-concur or 

17 partial concur response, the head of the executive agency 

18 shall submit to Congress a report with an explanation for 

19 the failure to respond or the non-concur or partial concur 

20 response. 

21 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act— 

22 (1) the term ‘‘covered final audit report’’ means 

23 a final audit report issued by the Special Inspector 

24 General for Afghanistan Reconstruction that in25 cludes a recommendation for an executive agency to 

26 seek reimbursement for failure by a contractor or 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 3505 IS

1 subcontractor to successfully complete a construction 

2 contract due to poor contractor performance, cost3 overruns, or other reasons that would, if imple4 mented, result in at least $500,000 in savings; and 

5 (2) the term ‘‘executive agency’’ has the mean6 ing given the term in section 133 of title 41, United 

7 States Code. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Jacov Vaisman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of Advanced  Medical  Institute Inc. for the quarter ended September
30, 2005 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Advanced Medical Institute Inc.

      I,  Dilip  Shrestha,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced  Medical  Institute Inc. for the quarter ended
September  30, 2005 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial  condition and results of operations of Advanced Medical Institute
Inc.

November 14, 2005

By:       /s/ Jacov (Jack) Vaisman
         -----------------------------------
         Jacov (Jack) Vaisman
         Chief Executive Officer

By:       /s/ Dilip Shrestha
         -----------------------------------
         Dilip Shrestha
         Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 32004M3644 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32004M3644

**Commission Decision of 17/12/2004 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3644 - VITERRA / DEUTSCHBAU) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the German text is authentic) **

*

*

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3644 — Viterra/Deutschbau)

(2005/C 38/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3644. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 13.1

Annual Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Santander UK plc (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2014 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: 4 March 2015 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Nathan Bostock     
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Nathan Bostock         
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: 4 March 2015 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen Jones      
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Stephen Jones          
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00141

- CR

Kenny Fernell Graves

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1361708D )

December 17, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

( nf p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirme d.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel