alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KELLY A. AYOTTE NEW HAMPSHIRE

COMMITTEES · ARMED SERVICES COMMERCE HOMELAND SECURITY & GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS 

# ilnitcd**~totes ~cnotc** 

BUDGET AGING

The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. Washington, DC 20590
Dear Secretary Foxx: WASHINGTON, DC 20510 (202) 224·3324 April 2, 2014 144 RU SS FLL BUILDIN(, WASHIN GTON , DC 20510 1200 ELM STRrrT, SuiTE 2 MAN CHf S1TR, NH 03101

144 MAIN STREET NAS HUA, NH 03060 14**MAN H~** **1TR** SQUARE, SUIT[ 140 POHTSMOUTH, NH 03801 19 Pt E'ASANT STREET, SUITE 138 B!"RLIN, NH 03570

Recently, several ofmy colleagues in the Senate wrote to you expressing concern with Norwegian Air International Limited's (NAI) pending application for an exemption and foreign air carrier permit. Additionally, the Senate Subcommittee on Aviation, where I serve as Ranking Member, examined this issue during a hearing last month. I support the Department's pursuit of"Open Skies" agreements that open markets for U.S. airlines and createjobs. These agreements also benefit U.S. consumers by promoting competition and ensuring high labor and safety standards. Certainly, the NAI application presents the Department with several novel questions, particularly with respect to its implications on competition, labor standards, and public safety. As you review the application, I encourage you to give due consideration to these concerns and ensure that the application is in the public interest. Thank.you for your consideration.
Sincerely,

# '1(~a.~ Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)



# s 10-140402-026 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3221 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 411
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3221

 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 
                    higher wages to their employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2012

Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Risch, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
Lee, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Coburn, and Mr. McConnell) 
      introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                              May 23, 2012

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 
                    higher wages to their employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rewarding Achievement and 
Incentivizing Successful Employees Act'' or the ``RAISE Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES.

    Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 159(a)) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization's exclusive 
representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and conditions of 
any collective bargaining contract or agreement then in effect, nothing 
in either--
            ``(A) section 8(a)(1) or section 8(a)(5), or
            ``(B) a collective bargaining contract or agreement renewed 
        or entered into after the date of enactment of the RAISE Act,
shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the unit greater 
wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by reason of, his or her 
services as an employee of such employer, than provided for in such 
contract or agreement.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 411

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3221

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 
                    higher wages to their employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 23, 2012

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
### SunWise Program Student Survey **Opt -**  **Out Form** Your child is being asked to take part in two brief survey s given by his/her teacher before and after yo ur child participates in the SunW ise Program. These simple, 10 - mi nute questionnaire s elicit basic information on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of children relating to sun exposure. T eachers who volunteer to participate will provide students with a double - sided, one - page anony mo us survey. After students complete the survey in the spring, teachers will lead SunW ise lessons. Based on SunW ise’s recommendations, teachers will administer the second survey about one year later to see if changes in sun protection have been made. Student survey respons es are voluntary and anony mo us. Children may

skip questions they do not wish to answer; however, we hope that they will answer as many questions as they can. The results from the student survey s are used to gauge program effectiveness and also to help guide materials development. The val id OMB control number for this information collection is 2060 - 0439 . Children's responses are protected from disclosure by federal statute (PL 107 - 279 Title I, Part C, Sec. 183). All responses may be used only for statistical purposes and may not be disclos ed or used in identifiable form for any other purpose, unless otherwise compelled by law. Data from multiple individuals will be combined to produce statistical reports. If y ou have any questions or concerns about the protection of the information you pr ovide or your child’s rights in this survey , please contact Rob Landolfi at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at 202 - 343 - 9161 or landolfi.robert @epa.gov

. **OPT -**  **OUT AG**  **REEMENT**

**I have read the letter and the information above.**

・ **I DO NOT consent to my child’s participation in the SunWise Program survey**  **.** CHILD’S NAME: First and last name Sign your name: Signature of parent/guardian Date Print your name: First Middle Last NOTE: If y ou will allow yo ur child to participate in the study, you do not need to return this form. If you **do not want your child to take part in this study** , please complete, sign, and return this form in the enclosed envelope to your child’s school.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3113 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-anthracenesulfonic acid, 1-amino-9,10- 

dihydro-9,10-dioxo-4-[[3-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]amino]-, sodium salt (1:2). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-anthracenesulfonic 

acid, 1-amino-9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-4-[[3-[[2- 

(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]amino]-, sodium salt 

(1:2). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3113 IS

1 SECTION 1. 2-ANTHRACENESULFONIC ACID, 1-AMINO-9,10- 

2 DIHYDRO-9,10-DIOXO-4-[[3-[[2- 

3 (SULFOOXY)ETHYL 

4 ]SULFONYL]PHENYL]AMINO]-, SODIUM SALT 

5 (1:2). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Anthracenesulfonic acid, 1- 

amino-9,10-dihydro-9,10- 

dioxo-4-[[3-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl 

]sulfonyl]phenyl]amino]-, sodium salt (1:2) (CAS No. 

2580–78–1) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.16.20) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

12 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3124 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic staple fibers containing 

at least 85 percent by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 percent or 

more but not more than 3 percent of water, raw white (undyed), crimped, 

with an average decitex of 2.2 (plus or minus 10 percent) and fiber 

length of 38 mm (plus or minus 10 percent). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic staple 

fibers containing at least 85 percent by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 percent or more but not more than 

3 percent of water, raw white (undyed), crimped, with 

an average decitex of 2.2 (plus or minus 10 percent) 

and fiber length of 38 mm (plus or minus 10 percent). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3124 IS

1 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS CONTAINING AT 

2 LEAST 85 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF ACRYLO3 NITRILE UNITS AND 2 PERCENT OR MORE 

4 BUT NOT MORE THAN 3 PERCENT OF WATER, 

5 RAW WHITE (UNDYED), CRIMPED, WITH AN 

6 AVERAGE DECITEX OF 2.2 (PLUS OR MINUS 10 

7 PERCENT) AND FIBER LENGTH OF 38 MM 

8 (PLUS OR MINUS 10 PERCENT). 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.07 of the Har10 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

11 acrylic staple fibers containing at least 85 percent by 

12 weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 percent or more but 

13 not more than 3 percent of water, raw white (undyed), 

14 crimped, with an average decitex of 2.2 (plus or minus 

15 10 percent) and fiber length of 38 mm (plus or minus 

16 10 percent)) is amended by striking the date in the effec17 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

20 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2005009EN.01000401.xml

| 13.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3651 — APAX/Cinven/CBR Group)

(2005/C 9/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 December 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3651. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3651. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
      connection with the accompanying Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A
      of
      Planet411.com Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, I certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Planet411.com Inc. for
              the
              quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A
              for
              the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
              Planet411.com Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
              /s/
                  Derek IvanyName:
              Derek
                  IvanyTitle:
              Principal
                  Executive Officer,
                Principal
                  Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
              August
                  7, 2006
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 26, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00180

- CR

Leonardo RIVAS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial Dis trict Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 04

- 10954

- CR

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant filed his third motion for extension of time to file the brief. We GRANT

appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to file his brief on or before July 23, 2014. Appellant

is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent written proof of extraordinary

circumstances.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 334 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

AN ACT 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving the 

American Falls Reservoir. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 334 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN3 VOLVING AMERICAN FALLS RESERVOIR. 

4 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

5 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

6 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com7 mission project numbered 12423, the Federal Energy 

8 Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the li9 censee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in 

10 accordance with the procedures of the Commission under 

11 that section, reinstate the license and extend the time pe12 riod during which the licensee is required to commence 

13 the construction of project works to September 25, 2013. 

Passed the Senate October 18, 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-82784, 333-38002, 333-49668, 333-91429, 333-96183, 333-103010, 333-107045, 333-113927, 333-116761, 333-125398 and 333-126585 on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 333-46648 on Form S-3; andRegistration Statement No. 333-63596 on Form S-4, of our reports dated March 15, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Quest Software, Inc., and management’s report on the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quest Software, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Costa Mesa, California 

March 15, 2006
Motion Granted; Appeal D ismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 7 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 11

- 00942

- CV

____________ WILLIAM J. HIBLER, Appellant

V.

ERIK GARZA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 30808



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 11 , 20 1 1 . The clerk’s record

was filed January 23, 2012 and no reporter’s record was taken

. On February 13, 2012, appellant filed a brief that was not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief failed generally to comply with the rules.

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) a nd (k). Appellee filed a motion to strike. The motion was granted and appellant was ordered to file an amended

brief.2

On April 13, 2012, appellant filed another brief, nearly identical to the first, that also
fail ed to comply with the Texas Rules of A ppellate Procedure. Appellee filed another motion
to strike. The motion was granted in part and appellant's brief was stricken.

When an appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant fr om filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to
file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecut ion.

A ppellant was ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten (10) days or the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j ) and (k). On May 17, 2012, appellant filed a third brief. On May 22, 2012, appellee filed a third motion to strike.
Appellant's brief still fails to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k). Accordingly, the motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justice s Seymore and Brown

.
EXHIBIT 12

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                   Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                         (Dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                            1999          1998         1997         1996          1995
                                            ----          ----         ----         ----          ----
<S>                                       <C>          <C>           <C>           <C>         <C>
Earnings:
     Pretax income                           $45,130       $32,779      $33,697      $45,939      $19,384
     Interest                                 28,573        20,506       18,890       13,797       12,111
     Interest in Leases                        1,548         1,507        1,152          861        1,086
     Amortization of Cap Interest                242           190          123          107           63
                                             -------       -------      -------      -------      -------
                                             $75,493       $54,982      $53,862      $60,704      $32,644
                                             =======       =======      =======      =======      =======
Fixed charges:
     Interest                                $28,573       $20,506      $18,890      $13,797      $12,111
     Capitalized interest                      1,032         1,215          118          202          690
     Interest in leases                        1,548         1,507        1,152          861        1,086
     Amortization of Cap Interest                242           190          123          107           63
                                             -------       -------      -------      -------      -------
                                             $31,395       $23,418      $20,283      $14,967      $13,950
                                             =======       =======      =======      =======      =======

     Ratio:                                    2.4x          2.3x         2.7x         4.1x         2.3x

</TABLE>



                                       67
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the date and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: March      14, 2008 |   |   | /s/      Dorothy Wong              |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |   |   | Dorothy      WongChief      Accounting Officer                                                      |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

s0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139408 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139408 

 COA: 291627 

Kalamazoo CC: 80-000188-FY 

FRANKIE LEE WEATHERSPOON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).