### U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATION ^

OFFIC E O F HEARING S '' ^ WASHINGTON , D.C . 

## m 2 6 201 1



# CEIVE D

I n th e Matte r

o f Harriso n Yach t

Sales , Inc . FA A Docke t

No . CP10EA000 6 FDM S No . FAA-2010-062 6 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yode r 

# EARIN G DOCKE T

•'-r-~ a ::/ i :x 3 •""." J ^X J m 

### COMPLAINANT' S WITNES S & EXHIBI T LIS T COME S NO W th e Complainant , b y an dthroug h it s designate drepresentative , th e Regiona l Counse l for th e Easter n Regio n an dhi s designate dan dauthorize d agents , an dprovide s it s witnes s an dexhibi t lis t an dcopie s o f

exhibit s t o b e offere d at th e hearin g o f

thi s matter . I n additio n t o th e witnesse s liste db y Respondent , Complainan t wil l rel y o n th e following : 1 . Ear l Andrease n Manage r FA A WD C Security Fiel dOffic e Hazardou s Material s an dDangerou s Good s Branch , Easter n Regio n P O Bo x 86152 8 Warrenton , V A 20187-152 8 (540)428-315 6 FA A WD C Securit

y Fiel dOffic e Manage r assigne dthi s matte r

fo r investigatio n t o FA A Special Agen t Ronal dGrieff ' A s Manager , Mr .

' ^4r . Grief

f retire dfromth e FA A in Decembe r 2010 .^ 

# s Andrease n wa s responsibl e fo r overseein g Ifa

e investigatio n an dfo r

reviewin g an dapprovin g th e allege dviolation s an ddi e civi l penalt y propose di n th e instan t matter . I t

i s anticipate dtha t

h e wil l testif

y abou t ho w th e prope r sanctio n fo r

Respondent' s violation s o f th e Hazardou s Material s Regulation s (HMR ) wa s assessed , i n accordanc e with Agenc y policy . EXHIBI T LIS T C-1 : FA A Orde r

2150.3B , FA A Complianc e an dEnforcemen t Program , Appendi x C , Sanctio n Guidance , Hazardoii s Material s Enforcemen t C-2 : Corter aBusines s Searc h fo r Harriso n Yach t

Sales , Inc . Copie s o f th e exhibit s th e complainan t propose s t o offer

a t th e hearin g i n thi s matte r

ar e enclose dan dmarked . Respectfull y submitted , Alfre dK Johnson , Jr . Regiona l Counse l 

### By : ;MJUX X - ^ Dated : Jettoin e C . Gotime r Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l (AEA-7 ) Easter n Regio n Headquarter s 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 Telephone : 71 8 553-327 2 Facsimile : 71 8 995-569 9 

# hth i

### CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E

I hereb y certif

y that o n thi s da

y copie s o f

th e foregoin g wer e place di n th e Unite d State s mail , postag e prepaid . Firs t Clas s Mai l addresse da s follows : An dvi afacsimil e Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 FA X 202-366-753 6 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (Original an don e copy ) 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbur Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m201 4 An dvi afacsimil e Davi dHarrison , Presiden t Harriso n Yacht

Sales , Inc . 10 6 Well s Cov e Roa d P O Bo x 9 8 Grasonville,M D 2163 8 FA X 410-827-483 0

Date : JA N 1 8 201 1 

# 'L . 

# n OMU-y ^ 

### Mariann aPerer o Paralega l Specialis t Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 410/01/0 7 2150.3 B Appendi x C . Sanctio n Guidanc e Hazardou s Material s Enforcemen t 1 . Background . a . Legislation . Congres s determine dtha t th e unregulate dtransportatio n o f hazardou s material s constitute s athrea t t o publi c safet

y in al l form s o f

transportation . Congres s addresse d tha t threa t i n 1974 b y enactin g th e Hazardou s Material s Transportatio n Ac t (HMTA) . B y 1990 , Congres s determine dtha

t effectiv e enforcemen

t o f th e HMT A require dmor

e sever e action , and enacte dth e Hazardou s Material s Transportatio n Unifor mSafet y Ac t o f 1990 , Publi c La

w No . 101-615 , 1990 U.S . Code Congress . & Admin . New s 10 4 Stat . 4605 . Th e primar

y effect o f thi s 199 0 revisio n o f

th e HMT A wa s t o rais e th e maximu mcivi l penalt

y fo r violatio n o f

an y regulatio n enacte dunde

r th e HMT A to $25,000 , and , fo

r th e first time , to require a$25 0 minimu mpenalt y fo r an y suc h violation . Th e HMT

A wa s recodifie di

n 1994 an di s no

w referre d t o a s th e "Federal hazardou s materia l transportatio n law, " 1994 U.S . Cod e Congress . & Admin . New s 10 8 Stat . 759 , codifie da t 4 9 U.S.C . §§5101-5127 . I n th e 199 4 recodification . Congres s specifically state dtha

t th e recodificatio n create dn o substantiv e chang e t o th e earlier for mo f th e statute . I n 2005 , th e Congres s enacte dan dth e President signe dth e Safe , Accountable , Flexible , Efficien t Transportatio n Equit

y Act : A Legac y fo

r User s (SAFETE

A - LU) , Publi c La

w 109-59 , Augus t 10,2005 . That

legislation , amon g other

things , modifiedth e limitation s o n civi l penaltie s tha

t ma y b e assesse dfo

r violation s o f

th e hazardou s material s statut e an dregulations . b . Civi l Penalties . Th e Federa l Civi l Penaltie s Inflatio n Adjustmen t Ac t o f 1990 , 2 8 U.S.C . § 246 1 (note) , a s amende db y th e Debt Collectio n Improvemen

t Ac t o f 1996 , Publi c La

w 104-134 , Apri l 26 , 1996 , provide s amechanis mfo r adjustment s fo

r monetar y civi l penaltie s fo

r inflatio n i n orde r t o maintai n th e deterrent

effect o f monetar y civi l penaltie s andpromot e complianc e wit

h th e law . Unde

r th e statute , th e adjuste dcivi l penalt y maximum s canno t

b e applie dunles s they are implemente db y regulation . Th e adjuste dcivi l penaltie s ar e liste di n par t 1 3 o f Titl e 1 4 o f

th e CFR , subpar

t H . Pursuant t o SAFETE

A - LU , th e maximu

mcivi l penalt

y tha t ma y b e assesse dfo

r aviolatio n o f th e Federa

l hazardou s materia

l la w o r ahazardou s materia

l regulatio n i s no w $50,000 ; th e minimumcivi l penalt

y i s no w $250 . There ar

e tw o exception s t o thos e limits . A maximu mcivi l penalt y o f $100,00 0 ma

y b e assesse di f

th e violatio n result s i

n death , seriou s illness , or

sever e injur y t o an y person , o r

substantia l destructio n o f

property . Th e minimumcivi l penalt y tha t ma y b e assesse dfo

r atrainin g violatio n i s $450 . c . Enforcemen t

Responsibility . Within th e Department o f Transportation , th e Pipelin e & Hazardou s Material s Safet y Program s Administratio n (PHMSA) , create dby th e Norma n Y . Minet aResearc h andSpecia l Program s Improvemen

t Ac t i n 2004 , adopt s th e Hazardou s Material s Regulation s (HMR) , whic h gover n th e transportatio n o f

hazardou s material s (hazmat) . Th e FAA , unde

r delegate dauthority , enforce s th e Federa l hazardou s materia

l transportatio n la

w andth e HMR , wit

h particula

r emphasi s on shipmen

t o f hazma t b y air . 4 9 C.F.R . § 1.47(j) . 

### C- 1 fieSlBIT V 1 CC-:L ) Ffl.cf F L -10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

d . Violatio n o f

th e HMRs . Th e HM

Rset fort h regulation s fo

r th e transportatio n o f

hazmat . A knowin g violatio n o f

th e statute o r

o f th e HM Rca n suppor t th e assessment

o f acivi l penalt

y betwee n $25 0 and$100,000 . A perso n act s knowingly when th e perso n ha s actua l knowledg e o f th e fact s givin g ris e t o th e violation ; o r areasonabl e perso n actin g i n th e circumstance s and exercisin g reasonabl e care woul dhav e tha t knowledge . 4 9 U.S.C . § 5123(a)(1)(A) . Th e civi l penaltie s authorize dunder th e statute apply t o eac h violatio n o f an y regulatio n set

fort h i n th e HMR ; the y als o apply t o th e violatio n o f a n order , specia

l permit , o r

approva l issue db y th e Department . Moreover , unde r th e statute , eac h continuin g violatio n o f th e HM Rca n constitute a separate violatio n fo

r eac h da y aviolatio n continues . I

n sectio n 5124 o f

th e statute . Congres s prescribe dcrimina

l penaltie s fo

r awillful violatio n o f

th e Federa

l hazardou s materia

l transportatio n la

w or th e HMR ; willful violation s require evidenc e o f bot h knowledg e o f

th e law s andregulation s an dintent t o violate them . e . Investigativ e an dEnforcemen t Procedures . Par

t 1 3 o f th e Federa

l Aviatio n Regulation s - Investigativ e an dEnforcemen t Procedure s (1 4 C.F.R . par t 13 ) govern s th e procedure s applicabl e to enforcement o f th e HM Rb y th e FAA . Hazma

t violation s occurrin g on o r afte r Augus t 2,1990 , ma

y b e dismisse dby a

n administrativ e la

w judg e (ALJ ) i

f anotic e o f propose dcivi l penalt

y ha s no t bee n issue dwithi n 2 year s o f th e violation , unles s goo dcaus e fo r dela y ha s bee n shown . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.208(d) . 2 . Consideratio n o f

Statutor y Criteria . A s agenera l matter , asanctio n shoul db e impose d tha t i s sufficiently deterren t

bu t no t excessive , i

n orde r t o compl y wit

h th e underlyin g purpose s o f th e Federa

l hazardou s material transportatio n la w andtIMR . I

n determinin g th e sanctio n to b e assessed , penalt

y criteri aset

fort h i n 4 9 U.S.C . § 512 3 mus t

b e considered . Thes e criteri aar e th e nature , circumstances , extent , andgravit y o f th e violation ; th e degre e o f culpabilit y o f th e violator ; th e histor

y o f pas t violation s (i f

any) ; th e abilit

y t o pay ; th e effect

on th e abilit

y t o continu e t o d o business ; an dother matter s a s justic e requires . Som e o f thes e consideration s already ar e factore dt o som

e exten t into th e categorie s i

n th e Hazardou s Materia

l Sanctio n Guidanc e Matrix . Th e statutor y factor s ar

e furthe r considere dunde

r th e weightin g analysi s tha t i s performe dto indicate th e amount o f th e civi l penalt

y withi n th e appropriate range , i.e. , a t th e minimum , moderate , o r

maximumportio n o f

th e sanctio n range . Th e Matri x recognize s tha t a n eve n higher

penalt y coul db e warrante dfo

r asignificantly aggravate dcase , consistent wit h th e increase dmaximu

mpenalt y o f $50,00 0 impose db

y SAFETEA-LU . I

n addition , th e Matri x reflect s th e potentia

l $100,00 0 penalty , als o impose db y SAFETEA-LU , fo

r aviolatio n tha

t result s i n death , seriou s illness , o r

sever e injur y t o an y person , o r

substantial destructio n o f property . 3 . Consistenc y o f

Penalt y Sanctions . Th e Hazardou s Material s Sanctio n Guidanc e i s designe d t o promot e better consistenc y s o tha

t simila r penaltie s are impose di

n simila r cases . Th e specifie dMatri x range s (e.g. , $250-$550 , or $15,000-$32,500 ) are intende dt o reflect th e nature , circumstances , extent , an dgravit y o f th e cas e a s compare dwit

h other type s o f cases . Eac

h case , however , mus t

b e evaluate don it s own facts . A sanctio n ma y diffe r fro mth e specifie dMatri x range s whe

n th e fact s an dcircumstance s o f acas e suppor

t either agreater o r lesse r penalty . Whe n aspecia l agent believe s tha

t apenalt y shoul dexcee dth e specifie dMatri x ranges , th e agen t shoul dconsul t

wit h lega l counse l befor

e furthe r processin g o f

th e Enforcemen

t Investigativ e Repor t (EIR) . Thi s consultatio n i s no t necessar y i n th e cas e o f

arecommende dpenalt

y tha t i s C- 2 

### fi^ae 3 ,10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

les s tha n tha t provide di

n th e Matrix . I

n either situation , th e basi s fo

r th e decisio n to g o outsid e th e range s shoul db e explaine di n detail . 4 . Par t 17 5 Violations . Violation s o f par t 17 5 o f th e HMR , whic h establis h particula r requirement s fo

r ai r carrier s andother

aircraf t operators , are containe di n aseparate matrix . However , suc

h operator s ofte

n offe r hazardou s material s fo

r ai r transportation , a s wel l a s accep t andtranspor

t them . Fo r thi s reason , such operator s ma y b e liabl e fo

r violation s bot

h a s a busines s entit

y withi n th e Hazardou s Material s Sanctio n Guidanc e Matrix , a s well a s fo r specifi c ai r carrier violations . 5 . Violatio n Committe db y Smal l Busines s Entity . T o meet statistics-gatherin g requirements , th e investigatin g specia

l agent mus t determin e whether

th e allege dviolato r

qualifie s a s asmal l busines s concer

n under th e Small Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen

t Fairnes s Ac t

o f 199 6 (SBREFA) . For

a n extensiv e discussio n o f

ho w t o mak

e tha t determination , se e Par

t One - Abbreviation s an dDefinitions , i n Appendi x B o f

thi s order . If

investigatin g specia

l agent s are unabl e to obtai n independently informatio n to determin e whether a n allege dviolato r

i s asmall busines s concern , the y reques t such informatio n i

n th e lette r o f investigation . Se e sampl e letter o f investigatio n i

n Figur e A- 1 o f Appendi x A . Becaus e violation s o f Titl e 4 9 o f

th e U.S . Code andth e HM

Rma y b e committe db

y entitie s i n additio n t o thos e normally regulate db y th e FAA , th e investigatin g agent

ma y nee dt o refe

r t o th e SBA' s complete tabl e o f siz e standard s to find th e correc t

siz e limit fo r a n allege dviolator . a . Enforcemen t

Polic y unde r

SBREFA . Chapter

7 , Paragrap h 10 , o f

thi s order generally outline s th e FAA' s enforcemen t polic y unde

r SBREFA . I

n determinin g whether

an dhow t o provid e fo r th e reductio n or

waiver o f civi l penaltie s fo

r statutor y o r regulator y violation s by small entities , th e FAA' s polic y ma y contai n certai n conditions . Thos e condition s ma y allo w fo r excludin g fro

msuc h areductio n or

waiver : asmal l entit

y tha t ha s been subjec t

t o multipl e enforcemen

t action s by th e agency , aviolatio n involvin g willful or crimina l conduct , aviolatio n tha t result s when there ha s no t been agoo dfait

h attemp t t o comply wit

h th e requirements , anda violatio n tha

t pose s aseriou s health , safet y or environmenta

l threat . Wit

h respec t t o ai r carrier s andother aircraf t operators , th e FA

A take s into consideratio n company siz e i n determinin g th e appropriate amoun

t o f civi l penalty . See th e Matrix , Figure C-1 , below . b . Informatio n Shee t

fo r Complaint s b y Smal l Busines s Concerns . Each FA A employe e wh o conduct s a

n inspectio n o f

asmall busines s concer

n tha t i s regulate dby th e FA

A provide s th e small busines s concer

n wit h a n informatio n sheet . Th e informatio n sheet inform s tha

t entit y tha t i t ma y submit complaint s or

comment s regardin g unfai r FA A regulator

y enforcemen

t to th e National Ombudsman . FA A specia l agent s ma

y obtai n acop y o f

th e informatio n sheet

fo r hazardou s material s inspection s andadditiona l guidanc e fo

r distributin g i

t fro mth e AS H regiona l offices . c . Reductio n o r

Waive r o f Penalty . Th e FA

A doe s no t

reduc e or waiv e th e penalt

y o f a n allege dviolato r

solely becaus e i

t i s asmall busines s entity . Thi s i s becaus e aviolatio n o f th e hazma t statute s or

HM Rtypicall y pose s aseriou s health , safety , or environmenta

l threa t (an d ma y involv e on e o f

th e other reason s fo

r exclusion) . Accordingly , th e FA A wil l usuall y reduc e C- 3 EXHIBF T . 1 (C-l ) 

# iV- ^10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

or waiv e apenalt

y only if th e smal l busines s entit

y provide s evidenc e t o demonstrate it s inabilit y t o pa y or tha t th e propose dpenalt

y woul dprevent

th e entit y fro mcontinuin g i

n business . d . Enforcemen t

Action s Othe r

tha n Civi l Penalties . Th e FA A may , i n limite d circumstances , announc e policie s to provid e fo r hazma t enforcemen

t action s les s onerou s tha

n civi l penalties , tha t

is , administrativ e actions . Suc h policie s ma

y apply t o small busines s entitie s or t o others , an dwil l b e announce da s Complianc e an dEnforcemen

t Bulletin s i

n thi s order . 6 . Us e o f th e Sanctio n Guidance . Thi s guidanc e provide s agenc y personne l wit h asystemati c wa y t o evaluate acas e andarriv e a t a n appropriate penalty , considerin g al l th e relevant statutor y criteri aincludin g mitigatin g andaggravatin g circumstances , if any . Statutor

y consideration s hav e been factore dint

o th e variou s range s withi n th e Sanctio n Guidanc e Matrix . Determinatio n o f wher e asanctio n lie s withi n thes e range s i s aide db y aserie s o f

weightin g question s tha

t prob e th e variou s aggravatin g andmitigatin g factor s tha t ma y exis t i n acase . a . Weigh t

Analysis . First , th e weightin g analysi s i s performed . Agenc y personne l respon d t o aserie s o f

question s t o determin e th e aggregate weigh t o f th e case . Th e aggregate weigh t o f th e cas e help s determin e th e sanctio n amount fo r eac h violatio n group withi n th e establishe d range s o f th e Matrix . b . Determinatio n o f

Sanction . It

i s important

t o note tha

t determinatio n o f

where th e sanctio n lie s withi n th e Matri x i s no t th e resul t o f amathematica

l computation . Evaluatio n o f th e cas e i s base don th e totalit

y o f th e fact s andcircumstances . Generally , if th e answer

t o a particula r questio n represent s amor e significant

aspec t o f acase , greater

consideratio n shoul db e give n t o tha t answer . Fo r

example , violation s involvin g a n extremel y dangerou s substance , even i n minut e quantities , migh

t warrant apenalt y a t th e maximu

mendo f th e rang e or

even apenalt

y exceedin g th e Matri x range s (i f no t alread y a t th e statutor

y maximum) . c . Determinatio n o f

Category . Unde

r th e Sanctio n Guidanc e Matrix , agenc y personne l determin e th e categor

y o f violato r th e perso n fall s withi n (for example , busines s entit

y tha t regularl y offers , accepts , o r transport s hazmat) andth e offens e categor y (for example , undeclare d shipment withi n hazma

t quantit y limitations) . Th e sanctio n range s under th e variou s violato r categorie s take into account th e relativ e culpabilit

y o f th e violator . Similarly , th e offens e categorie s addres s th e nature , circumstances , an dgravit y o f th e particula

r offense . Afte

r determinin g th e appropriate categorie s andintersectin g bo x o f th e Matrix , agenc y personne l then determin e whic h subcategorie s o f offense s {fo

r example , shippin g papers ) are allege dt o hav e been violated . Base do

n th e weightin g analysi s performe di n subparagraph s 8.a.-e. , a

n appropriate penalt

y i s assigne dfo

r eac h o f th e applicabl e violatio n groups . Th e penalt y amoun t fo r eac h relevan t

violatio n group i s adde dtogether t o reac h th e recommende dsanction . d . Othe r Relevan t Sanctio n Factors . Unde

r subparagrap h 8.g. , th e specia l agent then consider s other

relevant factors , includin g evidenc e o f correctiv e action . A recommende d sanctio n ma

y b e reduce dprio r

t o th e issuanc e o f

anotic e o f

propose dcivi l penalt

y whe n ther e i s adequat e reliabl e informatio n concernin g th e correctiv e action s take n by arespondent . Correctiv e action s tha

t justif y reductio n o f

th e recommende dpenalt

y mus t excee dth e minimu

m C- 4 EXHIBI T ,10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

lega l requirements . Th e specia l agent als o attempt s t o provide informatio n concernin g th e allege dviolator' s size , financia l condition , andabilit

y t o pa y arecommende dsanction . 7 . FA A Lega l Counse l Review . Whe n a n EI Ri s forwarde dt o lega

l counse l fo

r enforcemen

t action , counsel wil l giv e appropriate consideratio n t o th e recommende dsanction . FA A lega l counse l will als o revie w th e factors , analysis , anddetermination s under th e Hazardou s Material s Sanctio n Guidance . Th e basi s fo r deviatin g fro

mth e recommende dsanction , if any , shoul db e explaine dto , an

ddiscusse dwith , th e investigatin g specia l agent . Fina

l determinatio n o f

th e sanctio n amount

propose di

n th e notic e o f

propose dcivi l penalt

y i s ordinaril y aproduc t

o f join t decisionmakin g an

dapprova l o f th e investigatin g agent

an dth e lega l office . 8 . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Hazardou s Material s Sanctio n Guidance . Thi s Sanctio n Guidanc e i s divide dinto thre e sections : cas e analysis ; utilizatio n o f th e Sanctio n Guidanc e Matri x (Matrix) ; andconsideratio n o f other statutor y factors . Th e Sanctio n Guidanc e Matri x i s containe di

n Figur e C- 1 andth e Ris k

Categorie s ar

e containe di

n Figur e C-2 . a . Cas e Analysi s (Evaluatio n o f Statutor y Assessmen t

Factors) . (1 ) Thi s sectio n contain s aserie s o f question s t o assis t

aspecia l agent i n evaluatin g a cas e an drecommendin g asanction . I t als o assist s a

n attorne y i

n evaluatin g acas e file prior t o initiation , andafte

r additiona l informatio n i s receive di

n respons e to anotic e o f

propose dcivi l penalty . Th e question s review factor s involvin g th e nature , circumstances , extent andgravit y o f th e violation , th e violator' s degre e o f culpability , andth e violator' s histor y o f prior violations . Som e o f thes e factor s ar

e alread y considere dt o som

e extent withi n th e variou s categorie s o f th e Sanctio n Guidanc e Matrix . Th e question s i n thi s sectio n provid e additional consideratio n o f th e statutor y factor s andexamin e th e existenc e o f aggravatin g andmitigatin g factor s i n acase . (2 ) The agent

answer s eac h questio n i

n Sectio n I anddetermine s if arelativ e weight

o f minimum , moderate , or

maximumshoul db e assigne dbase don th e respons e t o th e question . Wit h th e exceptio n o f

Questio n (l)(a) , no t

al l question s wil l necessaril y apply t o agiven fact situation . Questio n (l)(a ) addresse s th e nature o f th e hazardou s material(s ) involved , andth e evidenc e wil l indicate th e ris k categor y and , therefore , th e weight . Th e aggravatin g or mitigatin g factor s addresse di n th e other question s onl y apply t o th e cas e whe n th e questio n receive s aye s response . Question s receivin g an o respons e d o no t affect th e weightin g o f

th e cas e andar

e tiot considered . For

example , tha

t th e violatio n di dno t

resul t in injur y o r damag e i s no t

amitigatin g factor , andshoul dno t

resul t i n penalt y mitigation . I

n man y instances , th e answer s t o mos t or al l o f th e question s wil l b e n o andth e only relevant weightin g factor

i n thi s sectio n wil l b e th e ris k categor y o f th e materia

l identifie di

n Questio n (l)(a) . (3 ) I n determinin g th e final aggregate weigh t o f th e case , th e response s t o eac h o f th e question s d o no t

hav e to b e equally considered . Determinatio n o f whether th e overal l cas e shoul dhav e aminimum , moderate , o r maximumweigh

t canno t b e determine dwit

h mathematica

l certainty . Generally , if

th e answe r t o aquestio n demonstrate s tha t th e factor a t issu e represent s a mor e significant

aspec t o f th e case , greater

consideratio n i s give n t o tha t factor . Th e final aggregate weight

i s base don th e totalit

y o f th e fact s an dcircumstance s o f th e case . Onc e C- 5 EXHIBI T . J . Cc-i )10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

determined , the final aggregate weight i s then utilize dt o arriv e a

t th e recommende dsanctio n fo r eac h applicabl e violatio n group o n th e Sanctio n Guidanc e Matri x {See , Figur e C-l) . b . Th e Nature , Circumstances , Extent , an dGravit y o f th e Violatio n (Factor s Concernin g th e Shipment) : (1 ) Wha t materiai(s ) wa s offered , transported , or accepte dfo

r ai r transportation ? Figur

e C- 2 divide s hazardou s material s o f particula r classes , divisions , andpackin g group s int o thre e ris k categories : Categor

y A , Categor

y B , an dCategor

y C . Findth e materia

l offered , transported , o r accepted , i

n Figur e C- 2 an danswer

th e question s below .

• If th e material(s ) i s i

n Categor y A , assig n aMaximu

mweight . • If th e material(s ) i s i

n Categor y B , assig n aModerate weight . • If th e material(s ) i s i

n Categor y C , assig n aMinimu

mweight . Guidanc e Note : Th

e categorie s in Figur e C- 2 represen t th e inheren t

ris k o f dange r to ai r transportatio n pose db

y th e material . I f

ther e i s mor

e than on e typ e o f

hazardou s materia l involve din the shipment , us e the hazardou s materia l in th e highes t ris k category . (2 ) Wha t quantit y o f th e material(s ) wa s offered , transported , o r accepte dfo

r ai r transportation ?

• Didth e package(s ) excee dth e authorize dquantit y limitation s b

y asignificant amount ? \fyes , consider

aModerat e or

Maximu mweigh t dependin g on th e degre e t o which th e limitatio n wa s exceeded . Guidanc e Example : Th

e quantit y limitatio n fo r

gasolin e o n apassenge r

plan e i s 5 liter s pe r package . I f

aviolato r offers 3 0 liter s in asingl e packag e o n apassenge r plane , assig n a maximu mweigh t fo r thi s factor .

• Didth e packag e contai n aforbidde n material ? I f

yes , assig n aMaximu

mweight .

• Wer e ther e multipl e package s i n th e shipment ? I f

yes , consider

aModerate or Maximu mweight , dependin g o

n th e numbe

r o f package s an dtota

l amount o f hazardou s materia

l bein g transporte di

n violation . Guidanc e Note : A packag e mean s apackagin g plu s it s contents . Ther e ma y b e multipl e package s in on e shipment

o r overpac k Multipl e package s ofte

n represen t

multipl e violations . Under th e Sanctio n Guidance , thi s fac t i s considere da n aggravatin g circumstanc e rathe r than a direc t multiplie r o f th e sanctio n fo r

eac h violation . Eac h case , however , mus t b e evaluate do n it s particula r facts . A ver

y larg e number

o f package s ma

y resul t i n suc h a n egregiou s cas e tha t the overal l weigh

t o f th e cas e i s s o hig h tha t

apenalty beyon dth e maximu mpoin t in th e rang e i s warranted . A n investigatio n wil l occasionall y revea l sufficien t evidenc e o f

severa l shipment s fro mthe sam e offero r over aperio do f

severa l days , al l o f

which involve violation s o f th e HMR . Thes e independent

act s o f offering usuall y ar e consolidate dinto on e EI Ran daddresse din one notic e C- 6 / s EXHIBIT , 1 Cc-1 )10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

o f propose dcivi l penalty . However , fo r purpose s o f

determinin g th e appropriat e sanction , eac h separat e shipment

wit h separat e ai r

waybil l o r

shippin g papers , separat e destination , and/o r othe r evidenc e establishin g i t

a s aseparat e shipment , i s ordinaril y considere da s aseparat e inciden t fo r purpose s o f

applyin g th e sanctio n guidanc e analysis . I t i s suggeste dtha t

th e separat e shipment s b e treate da s individual count s i n th e EI Ran dth e notic e o f

propose dcivi l penalty , wit

h eac h coun t

havin g it s ow

n sanctio n derive dfro mapplicatio n o f thi s guidance . (3 ) Di dth e shipment

caus e som

e damag e o r

har mt o person s or

propert y o r interfer e wit h commerce ? I

f yes , consider

aModerate o r

Maximu mweight . Guidanc e Note : Th

e fac t tha t n o damag e occurre da s aresul t o f th e shipment

i s no t amitigatin g factor . However , damag e o r harmma y aggravat e th e nature , circumstances , extent , an dgravity o f th e violation . Dependin g o n th e degre e o f damag e cause db

y th e shipment

and/o r th e existenc e o f

othe r aggravatin g factors , departur e fromth e range s ma y b e justified . I t

i s importan t t o note tha t

death , seriou s illness , o r

severe injur

y to an y person , o r

substantia l destructio n o f

property , warrant s additiona l consideratio n o f aggravatio n o f

th e tota l penalty . c . Violator' s Degre e o f

Culpability . Th e Matrix , Figur e C-1 , consider s th e relativ e culpabilit y o f th e violator . Thi s sectio n o f th e analysi s furthe

r evaluate s th e degre e o f

culpabilit y o f th e violator . (1 ) I s th e violato r

th e manufacture

r o f th e hazardou s material ? \fyes , consider a Maximu mweight . Guidanc e Note : A manufacturer o f ahazardou s materia l i s expecte dto hav e complet e knowledg e o f

th e natur e o f

th e hazardou s materia l i t

manufacture s o r

uses ; thus , ahig h degre e o f culpabilit y wil l ordinaril y b e impute dto it . (2 ) Di dsomeon e other

tha n th e violato r

prepar e th e shipment

fo r transportation ? I

f yes , consider aMinimu mor Moderat e weight . Guidanc e Note : Fact s supportin g a n affirmativ e answe r to thi s questio n ma

y b e caus e t

o mitigate culpabilit

y and/o r pursu e aseparat e enforcemen t actio n agains t

othe r responsibl e partie s wh

o handle dth e shipment . A shippe r tha t reship s material s receive dfromanothe r perso n in th e same packagin g i s independently responsibl e fo r ensurin g th e shipment

complie s wit h th e HMR . Nevertheless , th e reshippe r i s generall y considere dto hav e alesse r degre e o f culpabilit y fo r complianc e o f

th e packag e a s received . However , i f th e reshippe r

unpack s and/o r repackage s the shipment , the reshippe r remain s a s culpabl e a s th e origina l shippe r an d generall y i s no t

accorde dmitigatio n under thi s weightin g factor . (Fo r purpose s o f

thi s section , a "reshipper " refer s t

o aperson , othe r

tha n the origina l offeror , who offers ashipmen t o f hazardou s materia l fo r

transportation. ) (3 ) Didth e violato r

reasonably rely on incorrec t informatio n fro

manother source ? I f yes , consider

aMinimu mweight .

C- 7 l i EXHIBIT^ 

### i (c-i )10/01/0 7 2150.3 8

Guidanc e Note : Detrimental , reasonabl e relianc e o n anothe r part y ma y b e amitigatin g facto r whe n considerin g th e violator' s degre e o f culpability . Fo r

example , relianc e o n a n inaccurat e Materia l Safet

y Dat aSheet

(MSDS ) woul db e mitigating . (4 ) Doe s th e violato r

hav e ahistor

y o f previou s HM

Rviolations ? \fyes , consider a Moderate or

Maximu mweight . Guidanc e Note : T

o establis h aviolatio n history , aprio r violatio n mus t

b e a n actua l finding o f violatio n pursuan t

to alega l enforcemen

t action . Special agent s shoul dattemp t to determin e th e corporat e structur e o f

th e violato r

an dwhether

othe r busines s entitie s o r

name s ar e o r

hav e bee n use db

y th e entit y in orde r to obtai n acomplet

e violatio n history . Th

e number an dag e o f violation s shoul db e considered . Ordinarily , findings o f violatio n mor

e than 5 year s ol dcarr y les s weight , unles s acontinuin g patter n o f violatio n exists . d . Othe r Factors . (I ) Eac h cas e mus t

b e evaluate do

n it s particula

r facts . A s such , man

y case s ma

y present uniqu e scenario s andaggravatin g o r mitigatin g factor s tha

t are no t routinel y seen . I

f a n aggravatin g or

mitigatin g circumstanc e exist s tha t i s no t adequatel y addresse delsewhere i n th e sanctio n guidance , i

t ma y b e include dan dassigne daweight unde r thi s section . Th e factor shoul db e clearl y identifie dan dexplaine di n th e analysi s portio n o f

th e EIRandcarefully scrutinize dby legal counsel . Guidanc e Note : Fo r

example , ashipment

o f asingl e packag e containin g severa l differen t hazardou s material s ma

y presen t a n aggravatin g factor . Th e degre e o f

seriousnes s o f

thi s facto r wil l increas e i f

th e hazardou s material s ar e incompatibl e wit h eac h othe r

and , therefore , creat e a n increase drisk . Mitigatin g factor s ma

y als o exis t

that hav e no t been adequatel y considered . Fo r example , a shipment containin g ade minimi s quantit y o f materia l o r

a n amount

tha t woul dhav e qualifie d unde r th e smal l quantit

y exceptio n o f

4 9 C.F.R . §173. 4 ma

y presen t amitigatin g facto r

i f a s a resul t ther e wa s areduce dris k

to safet y i n transportation . Tha

t th e materia l coul dhav e been shippe da s aconsumer

commodit y ca n als o b e amitigatin g factor . e . Determin e th e Fina l Aggregat e Weigh t o f th e Case . (1 ) All th e responses/weight s are evaluate dt o determin e afinal aggregate weight fo r th e cas e {Minimum , Moderate , an dMaximum.) . Question s receivin g an o respons e wil l no t b e include di n thi s evaluation . T o determin e th e final aggregate weight , th e agent o r attorne y mus t exercis e hi s o r

her discretio n i

n ligh t o f th e statutor

y factor s andknowledg e o f th e particula

r fact s o f th e case . Th e fact s o f

th e particula

r cas e wil l dictate th e relativ e importanc e o f each o f th e weightin g factor s i

n reachin g th e final aggregat e weight . Th e final aggregate weight shoul d b e decide da s aresul t

o f careflil analysis , no t

amathematica

l averaging . I

t i s possibl e tha

t a singl e weightin g factor

ma y outweig h al l others . Th e agent or attorney' s analysi s shoul dalway s b e explaine di

n thi s regard . 

# 0- 8 

# n f ^10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

Guidanc e Example : A cas e involvin g ahazardou s materia l i n th e lowes t ris k category ma

y b e evaluate dt

o hav e amaximu

mweigh t becaus e o f

the larg e quantit

y shippe do r

the damag e resultin g fromth e shipment . f . Utiliz e th e Matri x (Figur e C-1) . (1 ) Th e sanctio n range s under th e offero r andoffens e categorie s o f

th e Sanctio n Guidanc e Matri x reflec t

th e relativ e culpabilit

y o f th e violato r

an dth e nature , circumstances , extent , an dgravit

y o f case s fo r th e majorit

y o f violations . Consideratio n o f thes e particula

r statutor y factor s unde

r th e Federa

l hazardou s materia

l transportatio n la

w i s buil t into th e Matrix . Further analysi s o f

th e statutor

y factor s i s require dt o determin e th e appropriate sanctio n withi n th e range s establishe dunder th e Matrix . Thi s analysi s i s performe di n subparagraph s 8.a.-e . Afte r determinin g th e final aggregate weight o f th e cas e unde

r subparagraph s 8.a.-e. , tha t weight i s applie dt o th e appropriate Matri x rang e t o identif y th e recommende dsanctio n amoun t fo r each o f th e relevant

violatio n group s andfo

r th e cas e a s awhole . Althoug h th e notic e o f propose d civi l penalt

y ma y cit e numerou s violation s o f aparticula

r par t o r subpar t o f th e HMR , unles s upwar ddeparture i s justified , asingl e penalt y amount fo r eac h violatio n group i s ordinaril y used t o reac h th e ful

l sanction . (2 ) Instructions .

• Identif y th e appropriate categor

y fo r th e typ e o f

entit y an dth e nature o f

th e offens e involve di

n th e case . Refe

r t o th e Definition s Sectio n tha t follow s th e Matri x i

n Figur e C- 1 fo r guidance . Go to th e intersectin g bo x andidentif y th e applicabl e sanctio n rang e fo r eac h violatio n group .

• Apply th e conclusio n reache di n th e subparagraph s 8.a.-e . weightin g analysi s t o assig n asanctio n amount

withi n th e minimum , moderate , or maximumportio n o f

th e sanctio n rang e fo r eac h relevant

violatio n group . Th e recommende dcivi l penalt y a t thi s stag e i s th e su

m o f th e sanction s fo

r eac h o f th e applicabl e violatio n groups . A sanctio n shoul dno t b e assesse d fo r aviolatio n group if

there hav e been n o violation s o f tha t par t o r subpar t o f th e HMR . Th e sanctio n amount

fo r eac h violatio n group nee dno t b e identica

l but ordinaril y i s withi n th e portio n o f th e particula

r sanctio n rang e tha

t represent s th e overal l weight o f th e case . (3 ) Departur

e fro mth e Matri x ranges . Th e range s o f penaltie s specifie di

n th e Matri x (e.g. , $250-$550 ) are intende dt o cover th e majorit

y o f case s involvin g violation s o f th e HMR . Th e fact s andcircumstance s o f aparticula

r case , however , ma

y justif y either a n upwar dor downwar ddeparture fro

mth e specifie dMatri x ranges . Thi s sanctio n guidanc e anticipate s departur e fro mth e specifie dMatri x range s when justified . A cas e involvin g violation s i n which th e nature , circumstances , extent , andgravit y o f th e incident

are particularl y sever

e or egregious , ma y justif y upwar ddeparture fro

mth e specifie dranges . If

th e investigatin g agent

believes , base dupon th e fact s o f

acase , tha

t apenalt y shoul dexcee dth e specifie dMatri x ranges , th e agen t shoul dconsul t

wit h lega l counse l befor

e flirthe r processin g o f

th e EIR . (However , i

n n o cas e ma y th e civi l penalt

y pe r violatio n excee dth e maximumallowe db y law. ) Conversely , th e investigatin g agent

ma y believ e tha

t mitigatin g factor s justif

y adownwar

ddeparture fro

mth e C- 9 i i EXHIBI T 1 Cc-J) P , 

# V-3

-10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

Matri x range . Consultatio n wit h lega l counse l i s not

necessar y i n th e cas e o f

arecommende d penalt y tha t i s les s tha n tha t provide di

n th e Matrix . (However , i

n n o cas e ma

y th e civi l penalt

y pe r violatio n b e les s tha

n th e minimu

mallowe db

y law. ) I n either situation , however , th e agen t i s t o provid e adetaile dexplanatio n o f th e basi s fo

r th e decisio n to g o outsid e th e ranges . (4 ) Violation s o f

par t 175 regulations , whic h establis h particula r requirement s fo

r ai r carrier s an dother

aircraf t operators , are containe di n aseparate matrix . However , suc h operator s ofte n offe r hazma t fo r ai r transportatio n a s wel l a s accep t an dtranspor

t it . A s such , th e operato r ma y b e liabl e fo

r violation s a s abusines s entit y withi n th e main Matri x a s wel l a s fo r th e specifi c par t 17 5 violations . g . Impac t

of Othe r Statutor y Factors . Th e Federa l hazardou s materia

l transportatio n la

w als o require s consideratio n o f aviolator' s abilit

y to pa y acivi l penalty , th e impac t o f th e civi l penalt y on th e violator' s abilit

y t o continu e t o d o business , andother matter s tha

t justic e requires . Consideratio n o f thes e factor s ma

y resul t i n adjustmen

t o f th e recommende dcivi l penalt y calculate di

n subparagrap h 8.f

. I n situation s where th e agent or attorne y i s i

n possessio n o f mitigatin g information , suc h a n inabilit y t o pa y th e recommende dcivi l penalt y o r correctiv e actio n taken , reductio n o f

th e recommende dpenalt

y ma y b e appropriate . Mitigatin g informatio n shoul db e sufficiently reliable , uncontroverted , anddocumente di n order t o suppor t reductio n o f th e recommende dcivi l penalt y prio r t o issuin g th e notic e o f

propose dcivi l penalty . (1 ) Abilit y t o pa y o r continu e i

n business . Historically , th e FA A ha s considere dthes e factor s afte

r th e issuanc e o f

th e notic e o f

propose dcivi l penalt

y du e t o th e absenc e o f

reliabl e financial informatio n o n whic h t o bas e areductio n prior t o th e issuanc e o f

anotice . Thi s Sanctio n Guidanc e recommend s tha t th e specia l agent mak e effort s t o obtai n reliabl e informatio n regardin g th e violator' s siz e an dfinancial conditio n fo r review prio r

t o th e issuanc e o f

anotice . Thi s informatio n wil l b e transmitte dt o th e lega l offic e fo r consideration . I

t i s recognize dthat

i t ma y no t alway s b e possibl e fo

r th e specia

l agent and/or attorney t o obtai n reliabl e financia l informatio n o

n aparticula

r respondent , tha

t financial circumstance s change , an dtha t informatio n ma y b e provide dafte

r th e issuanc e o f

th e notic e tha

t ma y warrant furthe r consideratio n o f

a respondent' s abilit

y t o pay .

• Th e investigatin g agen

t wil l attemp t

t o include financial informatio n a s a n exhibi t in th e EIR . I

t i s anticipate dtha

t thi s information , i f

available , wil l b e obtaine dfro mreliabl e financial dat abases . Financia l documentatio n shoul dinclude , but nee dno t b e limite dto , informatio n concernin g th e violator' s corporate structure , busines s address , officers , numbe r o f employees , andgros s revenues .

• Th e investigatin g agent provide s astatement

or commen t wit h respec t t o th e financia l informatio n obtaine dbu t ordinaril y doe s no t

evaluate th e financial conditio n o f a respondent

wit h respec t t o it s abilit

y t o pa y apropose dcivi l penalty . Th e investigatin g agent' s statemen t shoul dencompas s area s lik e th e numbe

r o f employees , gros s revenues , andnatur e o f busines s o f

th e violator .

• FA A lega l counse l review s th e financial informatio n provide di n th e EI Rand evaluate s it s sufficiency an drelevanc e t o th e recommende dcivi l penalty . Lega l counse l ma

y C-1 0 

### P/^j g / o10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

determin e if

mor e current informatio n exist s concernin g th e financial conditio n o f arespondent andif tha t informatio n substantiall y differ s fro mth e informatio n availabl e a t th e tim e o f preparatio n o f

th e EIR . I

f there i s abasi s fo

r determinin g tha

t th e recommende dsanctio n i s inappropriate base dupon th e financial information provide di n th e EIR , th e recommende d sanctio n i s adjuste dprio r

to issuanc e o f

th e notic e o f

propose dcivi l penalty . Thi s i s a preliminar y consideratio n o f

acompany' s abilit

y t o pay . A s such , pre-notic e adjustmen t o f a recommende dcivi l penalt

y doe s no t preclud e furthe

r consideratio n o f

arespondent' s financial claim s afte

r issuanc e o f

th e notice . (2 ) Correctiv e Action .

• Th e mos t

commo n othe r

matte r tha t th e FA A take s into consideratio n i s correctiv e action . Correctiv e actio n tha t result s i n mitigatio n i s remedia

l actio n tha

t exceed s th e minimu

m lega l requirements . Th e primar y factor s i n determinin g th e appropriate amount o f penalt y reductio n ar

e th e extent

andtimin g o f

th e correctiv e action . I

n other words , mitigatio n i s determine do

n th e basi s o f

ho w much correctiv e actio n wa s take n an dho w quickl y th e actio n wa s taken . Systemi c chang e intende dt o prevent futur e violation s shoul db e given greater consideration . Similarly , correctiv e actio n tha t commence s upon th e violator' s first learnin g o f th e violation s ordinaril y i s given greater credi t tha n correctiv e Jictio

n tha t commence s only afte

r th e violato r

receive s th e lette

r o f investigatio n or

th e notic e o f

propose dcivi l penalty . Mitigatio n o f

arecommende dcivi l penalt y base dupo n correctiv e actio n shoul db e reference di

n th e Notic e o f

Propose dCivi l Penalt

y s o tha t th e respondent

i s o n notic e tha

t credi t already ha s bee

n given fo r such action . (2 ) Statu s o f

violato r a s asmal l busines s entit

y o r concern . Se e subparagraph s 5.a.-b . above .

C-1 1 1 1 ^i^BfT x 

### 1 

### (C'l )

### 10/01/0

7 2150.3 8

MATRI X & DEFINITION S (Figur e C-1 )

OFFENS E CATEGORIE S I . Declare dSl^ipment 1 . Shippin g Paper s 2 . Label s 3 . Marking s 4 . Packagin g 5 . Trainin g 6 . Emerg . Respons e 7 . Releas e int

o Environ . 8 . Other II . Undeclare dShiDmen t Withi n Hazma t Quantit y Limitation s 1 . Shippin g Paper s 2 . Label s 3 . Marking s 4 . Packagin g 5 . Trainin g 6 . Emerg . Respons e 7 . Releas e into Environ . 8 . Other III . Undeclare d Shlpmci^ t Hazma t Forbidde n on . o r exceed s at v limit s for . Passenge r Aircraf t 1 . Shippin g Paper s 2 . Label s 3 . Marking s 4 . Packagin g 5 . Trainin g 6 . Emerg . Respons e 7 . Releas e into Environ . 8 . Other IV . Undeclare d Shipmen t Forbidde n on . o r exceed^ qt y limit s for , AIIAircra n 1 . Shippin g Paper s 2 . Label s 3 . Marking s 4 . Packagin g 5 . Trainin g 6 . Emerg . Respons e 7 . Releas e into Environ . 8 . Other V . Intentiona l o r A . Individual * 250-55 0 250-55 0 250-55 0 250-55 0 250-55 0 250-55 0 250-55 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0

500-5,50 0 500-5,50 0 500-5,50 0 500-5,50 0 500-5,50 0 500-5,50 0 500-5,50 0

500-32,50 0 500-32,50 0 500-32,50 0 500-32,50 0 500-32,50 0 500-32,50 0 500-32,50 0 CONSULT B . Busines s Entit y 250-1.10 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0 450-1,10 0 250-1.10 0 250-1,10 0 250-1,10 0 1,500-8,20 0 1,500-8,200 1,500-8,200 1,500-8,200 1.500-8.200 1,500-8,200 1,500-8,200 1,500-8,20 0

5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16.20 0 5.000-16.20 0 5.000-16.20 0 5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16.20 0

7,500-32.50 0 7.500-32.50 0 7,500-32.50 0 7,500-32.50 0 7,500-32,50 0 7,500-32,50 0 7,500-32,50 0 7,500-32.50 0 CONSUL T C . Busines s Entit y tha t use s o r handle s hazma t i n th e cours e o f busines s 500-2.20 0 500-2.20 0 500-2.20 0 500-2.20 0 500-2.20 0 500-2.20 0 500-2.20 0 500-2.20 0

2.500-11.00 0 2,500-11,00 0 2.500-11.00 0 2.500-11.00 0 2.500-11,00 0 2,500-11,00 0 2,500-11,00 0 2.500-11,00 0

7,500-22,00 0 7,500-22,00 0 7,500-22.00 0 7,500-22,00 0 7.500-22.00 0 7,500-22,00 0 7,500-22,00 0 7.500-22,00 0

10.000-32,50 0 10,000-32,50 0 10,000-32,50 0 10,000-32,50 0 10.000-32,50 0 10,000-32.50 0 10.000-32.50 0 10.000-32.50 0 CONSUL T D . Busines s Entit y tha t regularl y offers , accepts , o r transport s hazma

t 1,000-5.50 0 1.000-5.500 1.000-5.500 1.000-5.50 0 1.000-5.500 1,000-5,50 0 1,000-5,50 0 1,000-5,50 0 5,000-13,00 0 5,000-13,00 0 5,000-13.00 0 5.000-13.00 0 5.000-13,00 0 5.000-13,00 0 5,000-13,00 0 5.000-13,00 0

10.000-32.50 0 10.000-32.50 0 10.000-32.50 0 10.000-32.50 0 10,000-32.50 0 10.000-32.50 0 10,000-32.50 0 10.000-32.50 0

15.000-32.50 0 15,000-32.50 0 15,000-32,50 0 15,000-32,50 0 15.000-32.50 0 15.000-32,50 0 15.000-32.50 0 15,000-32,50 0 CONSUL T C-1 2 EXHIBI T 

### 1 Cc-i ) fi^^e /a .10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

Deliberat e Violation , o r othe r sieniflcan t aggravatio n VI . Violatio n result ? in sever e iniurv . o r subf^ntia l de^tnictioi f o f propert y LEGAL - U p t o 50,00 0 pe r offens e categor y ma y b e assesse d CONSULT LEGA L - U p t o 100,00 0 pe r offens e categor

y ma y b e assesse d LEGA L - U p t o 50.00 0 pe r offens e categor y ma y b e assesse d CONSUL T LEGAL-U p t o 100.00 0 per offens e categor

y ma y b e assesse d LEGA L - U p t o 50.00 0 pe r offens e categor y ma y b e assesse d CONSULT LEGA L - Up t o 100.00 0 pe

r offens e categor y ma y b e assesse d LEGAL-U p t o

50.00 0 pe r offens e categor y ma y b e assesse d CONSULT LEGA L - U p t o 100,00 0 ma

y b e assesse d h . ^Sanction s applicabl e t o ai r carrie r an dcommercia l operato r passenger s an d crewmembers . Th e rang e fo r th e total civi l penalt

y to b e assessed , absent

mitigatin g o r aggravatin g factors , i s $25 0 (th e statutor y minimum) to $1,000 . AI RCARRIE RAN D OTHE RAIRCRAF T OPERATO RVIOLATION S Failur e t o comply wit

h Part s 171 , 172 , or

17 3 requirement s o f

th e HM Ra s a n offero r o f hazmat . Imprope r acceptanc e o f

hazma t fo r ai r transportation , (i.e. , quantity , labeling , marking , packaging , and shippin g papers ) Se e 4 9 C.F.R . § § 175.30(a)(1 ) - (4 ) Failur e t o inspec t

hazma t shipment properly . Se e 4 9 C.F.R . § § 175.30(b) , (c) , (d) , (e ) Imprope r storage/securin g o f

hazma t aboardaircraft . Failur e t o provid e hazma

t training , maintai n record s o f training , or

mee t minimumrequirement s fo r hazma t trainin g (4 9 C.F.R.) . Usin g untrained/improperl y traine dhazma t personnel , failur e t o retai n hazma

t trainin g record s (4 9 C.F.R. ) Failur e t o notif y FA A properl y o f

incident/discrepancie s i n hazma t shipment . Failur e to provid e notic e t o th e pilot-in-command . Other Par t 17 5 violations . Intentional , deliberate , o r

other significantly aggravate d violation . Violatio n result s i

n death , seriou s illness , severe injury , or substantia l destructio n o f

property . E . Grou p I & I I Ai r Carrier s an d Othe r Aircraf t Operator s Us e mai n Matrix . 5,000-32,50 0 10,000-32,50 0 10,000-32,50 0 10,000-32,50 0 10,000-32,50 0 5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16,20 0 CONSUL T LEGA L - U p t o 50,00 0 pe r offens e categor

y ma y b e assesse d CONSUL T LEGA L - U p t o 100,000 per offens e categor

y ma y b e assesse d F . Grou p II I & I V

Ai r Carrier s an d Othe r Aircraf t Operator s Us e main Matrix . 2,500-16,20 0 5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16,20 0 5,000-16,20 0 1,000-5,500 1,000-5,500 1,000-5,500 CONSUL T LEGA L

- U p t o 50,00 0 pe

r offens e categor

y ma y b e assesse d CONSUL T LEGA L -U p t o 100,000 pe

r offens e categor

y ma y b e assesse d C-1 3 ^ EXHIBIT ^ e < 310/01/0 7 2150.3 B

9 . Definitions : Not e tha

t thes e definition s are only fo r th e purpos e o f

applyin g th e sanctio n guidanc e i n thi s appendix . a . Ai r Carrie r an dOthe r

Aircraf t Operato r

Group s (I , II , III , IV ) - Air carrier s an d other aircraf t operator s are divide dint

o tw o categorie s fo

r purpose s o f

determinin g a

n appropriate sanction . Thes e categorie s trac k th e air carrier group s establishe di

n Appendi x B thi s order . Fo

r purpose s o f

hazma t sanctio n guidance , th e FA A als o include s other

aircraf t operator s operatin g i n commerc e tha t ar e o f simila r size , e.g. , par

t 12 9 Foreig n Ai r

Carriers , par

t 12 5 Operators , an dpar

t 9 1 Operators . (1 ) Group I i s comprise do f ai r carrier s wit

h annua l operatin g revenu e o f

$ 100,000,00 0 or more . Othe

r aircraf t operator s wit

h annua l operatin g revenu e o f

$100,000,00 0 o r

mor e ar e include di n Group I fo

r hazma t sanctio n guidanc e purposes . (2 ) Group I

I i s comprise do f

ai r carrier s andother

commercia

l operator s tha

t hav e a n annua l operatin g revenu e o f

les s tha n $100,000,000 , andhav e 5 0 o r mor e pilot s an doperate 2 5 or mor e aircraft . Other

aircraf t operator s o f

th e sam e siz e are include di

n Grou p I I fo r hazma t sanctio n guidanc e purposes . (3 ) Group II

I i s comprise do f

air carrier s andother

aircraf t operator s tha

t d o no t meet th e criteri afo r Group II , that

is , the y hav e onl

y 6 t o 4 9 pilots , or

only 6 t o 2 4 aircraft . Other aircraf t operator s o f

th e sam e siz e are include di

n Group II I fo

r hazma t sanctio n guidanc e purposes . (4 ) Grou p I V i s comprise do f

al l other ai r carrier s andcommercia

l operator s no t

meetin g th e criteri afo

r Group s I , II , o r

III . Othe r aircraf t operator s o f

th e same siz e ar

e include di

n Group I V fo r hazma t sanctio n guidanc e purposes . b . Busines s Entity . A business , corporation , partnership , Sub- S Corporation , sol e proprietor , association , o

r an y typ e o f commercia

l entity . A

n individua

l wh o offer s ahazma

t shipment i n air transportatio n i

n th e cours e o f

hi s or her self-owne dbusines s fall s into thi s category . I

t include s anon-profi t

organizatio n an dal l other entitie s define dunder

th e HMR' s definitio n o f

perso n (4 9 C.F.R . § 171.8) , wit h th e exceptio n o f

a n individua

l (a s define dbelow) . c . Busines s Entit y tha t

Regularl y Offers , Accepts , o r Transport s Hazardou s Material s i n th e Cours e o f

It s Business . A busines s entit y tha t offer s hazma

t wit h som e anticipate d frequency , o r

purport s t o d o so , regularl y offer s hazmat . For example , acatalogu e compan y tha t offers hazardou s materia

l t o it s customer s woul dfal l into thi s category , even thoug h it s actua l sal e or transportatio n o f

th e hazma

t i s infrequen

t o r limited . Thi s categor

y include s manufacture

r or distributo r

o f hazma t an dafreigh

t forwarder . d . Busines s Entit y tha t

Uses , Handle s Hazma t

i n th e Cours e o f

It s Business . Thi s categor y encompasse s th e busines s tha t utilize s hazma

t i n it s busines s bu t

doe s no t offe r i t fo r transportatio n on aregula

r basis , a s describe dabove . Fo r example , amanufacture

r o f anon hazma t produc t tha t use s hazma

t i n th e manufacturin g proces s coul dfal l into thi s category . It mus t b e establishe dtha

t th e company ordinaril y doe s no t offe r th e hazma

t i t udlize s fo r transportation , andth e shipment i n thi s instanc e represent s a n isolate dincident . Thi s typ e o f busines s i s hel dto ahighe

r standardtha

n th e busines s entit

y tha t ha s n o regula

r involvemen

t C-1 4 l i EXHIBI T 1 Cc-l' ) 

### P^g g 

### N10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

wit h hazmat . Th e describe dbusines s entit y receive s th e subjec t

hazardou s materia

l i n transportatio n anduse s i

t i n it s business ; thus , i

t i s clearl y o

n notic e o f

th e hazardou s nature o f th e materia

l andth e regulator

y requirement s t o whic h th e hazma t i s subject . e . Declare dShipment . Fo r purpose s o f

thi s sanctio n guidance , adeclare dshipment ha s a t leas t on e o f th e following communicativ e indicia—markings , labels , and/o r shippin g paper s tha

t mee t th e communicativ e requirement s o f th e HMR . A packag e tha

t ha s shippin g paper s tha

t declare th e content s a s hazardou s material , but i s otherwis e no t

marke do r

labeled , fall s into thi s category . Fo

r purpose s o f

thi s definition , ashippin g pape r i s an y document

t o whic h handler s refe r i n th e norma

l cours e o f

transportatio n an dtha

t complie s wit

h on e or mor e o f th e communicativ e requirement s i n th e HMRfo

r shippin g papers . Similarly , aproperl y marke dand labele dpackag e tha

t lack s shippin g paper s als o fall s into thi s category . A n exampl e o f

a shipment tha t woul dno t

mee t thi s definitio n i s on e wher e th e offero

r state s tha t th e shipment contain s hazmat , but

only i n paperwor

k t o whic h th e handler s d o no t refe r i n th e norma

l cours e o f transportation . f . Hazma t

- A hazardou s material , a s define di n 4 9 C.F.R . § 171.8 , include s andi s interchangeabl e wit

h th e ter mdangerou s goods , a s use di n th e Internationa

l Civi l Aviatio n Organizatio n (ICAO ) Technica l Instructions . g . Individua l - A huma

n wh o offer s ashipment

o f hazardou s materia

l i n hi s o r her persona l capacity , without

any busines s purpos e andno t a s par t o f acommercia

l enterprise . h . Intentiona l o r

Deliberat e Violatio n - A violatio n fall s into thi s categor y when th e offeror , acceptor , ai r

carrier , o r

aircraf t operato r ha s knowledg e o f

th e requirement s o f

th e HMR , an dwillfully circumvent s o r attempt s to circumvent

thos e requirements . Fo r

example , a

n offero r wh o place s aproperl y marke dandlabele dhazma t shipmen t alon g wit h properl y complete d shippin g papers , into a

n overpac k

marke dd s printe dmaterial , ha s committe da n intentiona

l or deliberate violation . i . Undeclare dShipmen t - If ashipment

doe s no t meet th e definitio n o f

declare dshipment , i t i s a n undeclare dshipment . j . Undeclare dShipmen t Hazma t Exceed s Quantit y Limit s fo r Al l Aircraf

t - A n undeclare dshipmen

t tha t i s offeredfo

r transportatio n on o r

transporte don an

y aircraf t an dthe quantit y o f hazardou s materia

l exceed s th e limit , pe

r package , fo

r transportatio n on carg o aircraft , a s establishe di

n th e 4 9 C.F.R . § 172.10 1 Table . k . Undeclare dShipmen t Hazma t Exceed s Quantit y Limit s fo r Passenge r

Aircraf t - A n undeclare dshipmen

t tha t i s offeredfo

r transportatio n on o r

transporte don apassenger aircraft , an dth e quantit

y o f hazardou s materia

l exceed s th e limitation , pe r package , fo

r transportatio n o

n passenge r aircraf t (bu t no t fo r transportatio n on carg o aircraft) , a s establishe di n th e 4 9 C.F.R . § 172.10 1 Table . I . Undeclare dShipmen t Hazma t Forbidde n o n Al l Aircraf t - A n undeclare dshipmen

t tha t i s offeredfo

r transportatio n o n o r

transporte do n any aircraf

t an dth e hazardou s materia l i s forbidde n i n air transportatio n on carg o aircraft , a s establishe di n th e 4 9 C.F.R . § 172.10 1 Table . C-1 5 U EXHI^^ ^10/01/0 7 2150.3 B

m . Undeclare dShipmen t Hazma t Forbidde n o n Passenge r Aircraf t - A n undeclare d shipment tha t i s offeredfo

r transportatio n o

n o r transporte do

n apassenger

aircraft , an dth e hazardou s materia

l i s forbidde

n i n ai r transportatio n o

n passenge

r aircraf t (bu t no t i n ai r transportatio n on carg o aircraft) , a s establishe di n th e 4 9 C.F.R . § 172.10 1 Table . n . Undeclare dShipmen t Withi n Hazma t

Quantit y Limitations . (1 ) If th e undeclare dshipment

i s offeredfo

r transportatio n o

n o r transporte don apassenge r aircraft , th e quantit

y o f hazardou s materia

l mus t b e withi n th e limitation , pe r package , fo

r transportatio n on passenge r aircraft , a s establishe di

n th e 4 9 C.F.R . § 172.10 1 Table . (2 ) If th e undeclare dshipment

i s offeredfo

r transportatio n o n acarg o aircraft , bu t not transported , the quantit

y o f hazardou s materia

l mus t b e withi n th e limitation , pe r package , fo

r transportatio n o n passenge r aircraft , a s establishe di

n th e 4 9 C.F.R . § 172.10 1 Table . (3 ) If th e undeclare dshipment

i s offeredfo

r tremsportation on an dtransporte do n acarg o aircraft , th e quantit

y o f hazardou s materia

l mus t b e withi n th e limitation , pe r package , fo

r transportatio n on carg o aircraft , a s establishe di n th e 4 9 C.F.R . § 172.10 1 Table . Al l other undeclare dshipment s fit

withi n th e definition s fo

r Undeclare dShipmen

t Hazma t Exceed s Quantit

y Limit s for...Aircraft , o r

Undeclare dShipmen

t Hazma t Forbidde n on...Aircraft , se e above .

C-1 6 l i EXHIBIT ^ 

### / 6

- ^10/01/0 7 2150.3 8 

### RIS KCATEGORIE S (Figur e C-2 ) CATEGOR Y "A " {Maximu m Weight } Categor y "A " matoriat o ar * material * tlia t whe n release d I n th e confine s o 1 a n aircraf t ca n potentiall y hav e a catastrophi c effec t o n a n aircraft' s abilit y t o continu e saf e flight , reeuKIn g I n a cras h o remergenc y landin g cauein g injur y o rdeat h t o passenger s an d flightcrew , a s wel l a s peison s o n th e ground . Clas s 1 Explosives : Divisio n 1.1,1.2,1.3 , Clas s 2 Compresse d Gase s Ai l 2.1 , 2. 2 wit h Subsidiar y Ris k 5. 1 an d Ai l 2. 3 Pi H Zone s A- D Clas s 3 Fiammabi e Liquid s P G I , il , an d (PiH ) Clas s 4 Divisio n 4. 1 Flammabl e Solid s P G i , & (iVIatches )

Divisio n 4. 2 Spontaneousl y Combustibl e IMateriai s P G i (Pyrophoric ) Divisio n 4. 3 Dangerou s Whe n We t P G I Clas s 5 Divisio n 5. 1 Oxidizin g Liquid s an d Solid s P G I , II , e.g. , "Chemica l Oxyge n Generators "

Divisio n 5. 2 Organi c Peroxide s P G I I (Typ e A,B,C,D ) Clas s 6 Divisio n 6. 1 Toxic/Poisonou s iMaterial s P G I (PiH ) Clas s 7 Carg o Aircraf t Onl y Quantitie s o n Passenge rAircraf t Clas s 8 Corrosiv e Materia l Liqui d P G i an d (PiH ) Forbidde n IWIaterial s (Se e 4 9 C.F.R . § 173.2 1 & ICA O Technica l instructions ) Forbidde n Hazma t liste d i n Dangerou s Good s Tabl e 4 9 C.F.R . § 172.10 1 

### CATEGOR Y "B " {Moderat e Weight } Th e material s liste d I n Categor y "B " ar e material s tha t ma y no t pos e a n Immediat e threa t t o th e safet y o f a flight , bu t ca n caus e deat h o rInjur y t o person s du e t o unintende d leieaae s i n aircraf t cabi n areas , an d potentia l damag e t o aircraf t structura e ove ra longe rperio d o f tim e du e t o undiscovere d release s o n aircraf t structura l components . Clas s 1 Divisio n 1.4,1.5,1.6 , Ai l Compatibilit y Group s Clas s 3 P G II I Flammabl e Liquid s Clas s 4 Divisio n 4. 1 Flammabl e Solid s P G II , II I

Divisio n 4. 2 Spontaneousl y Combustibl e Material s P G ii , il l Divisio n 4. 3 Dangerou s Whe n We t P G II , il l Clas s 5 Divisio n 5. 1 Oxidizin g Liquid s o rSolid s P G II I

Divisio n 5. 2 Organi c Peroxide s (Typ e E,F,G ) Clas s 6 Divisio n 6. 1 Toxic/Poisonou s Material s P G i , i l ( NON - PI H )

Divisio n 6. 2 Infectiou s Substance s Clas s 7 Radioactiv e Materials , yello w labe l II , whit e labe l I Clas s 8 Liquid s P G ii . II I Solid s P G I , ii , II I 

### Categor y "C " {Minimu m Weight } Th e materiai a liste d i n Categor y "C " ar e material s tha t presen t th e leas t amoun t o f risl c t o th e transportatio n system . Clas s 2 2. 2 Nonflammabl e Ga s Clas s 6 Divisio n 6. 1 Toxic/Poisonou s Material s P G II I Clas s 7 Ai l othe rRA M (LSA , LT D QTY , instruments , an d Articles ) Clas s 9 Miscellaneou s Dangerou s Good s {ORM- D an d Consume rCommodity } NOTE : Thi s guidanc e i s no t intende d t o replac e th e experience d Judgmen t o f a specia l agen t wh o I s convinced , base d o n th e evidenc e an d fact s o f a case , tha t th e failur e o f a n ai rcarrier , shipper , freigh t forwarder , o rpassenge rt o follo w establishe d regulation s ha s pose d a ris k t o aviatio n safety .

C-1 7 l i EXHIBI T - % ^ 

# n

### HARRISON YACHT SAL^ S INC , 10 6 WELL S C

V ROAD , GRAS'^NVILLE , MD , 216.. . Pag e 1 o f 3 Hello . Sig n i n t o ge t inor e & contribute . 

# Corter a 

# O " busines s searc h

Ente rCompan y Nam e 

# xoP- q lEnte rCit y

^ > Busines s Director y > HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C 

## HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C Get th e Compan y Profil e Updat e Edi t Company Profil e Lin k t o ttii s paq e Bu y a Corte i Free ! Contac t Inf o Ke y Fact s Paynrien t Ris k Today' s Headline s Ma p & Direction s Busines s Directorie s Fo rSubscriber s Busines s Repor

t ($3.00 ) Custome rMonitorin g Batc h Append s Banl<ruptc

y Filing s Lien s & Judgment s Statistic s Busines s Account s Receivabl e Deb t Pas t Du e by Stat e - Apri l 200 9 Presenc e o f Busines s Qualifrer

s (include s Liens , Judgn^ents , Banlcruptc

y an d Place d fo r Collections ) b y Stat e - Apri l 200 9 Businesse s wit h Account s i n Collection s b

y Stat e - Apri l 200 9 Busines s Account s Receivabl e Deb t Greate rTha n 9 0 Day s Pas t Du e by Stat e - Apri l 200 9 1 0 State s wit h th e Highes t Rate o f Pas t Du e Account s - Apri l 200 9 1 0 State s wit h th e Lowest Rate HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C Descriptio n HARRISO N YACH T SALES IN C i s i n th e An^ngemen t o f Transportatio n o f Freigii t an d Carg o i n GRASONVILLE , MD . Thi s compan y currentl y ha s approximatel y 1 t o 5 employee s an d annua l < Unde r$500,000 .

^onpl/t'ifit>tn ' S



### I certif y tfii s tru e c Sign e Dat e EXHIBf T c3Cc-j )



### http://start.cortera.com/company/research/k3p01yp7o/harrison-yacht-sales-inc / 8/17/200 9

### HARRISO

N YACH T SAL^ S INC , 10

6 WELLS C

V ROAD , GRASONVILLE , MD , 216.. . Pag e 2 of 3

200 9 Pas t Du e Experience by Industr y • Apri l 200 9 C 3 Subscrib e t o thi s Feed Contac t Informatio n 10 6 WELL S C

V ROA D GRASONVILLE , M D 2163 8 Paymen t Risi c

^ ^ ' ^

^ ^ HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C pay s fas t mos t firms . Ge t detaile d financia l informatio n here . Ke y Fact s Locatio n Type : Industry : Yea r Founded : Sale s Range : Employees : Singl e Locatio n

Arrangemen t o f Transportatio n o f Freigh t an d Carg o 200 6 Unde r$500,00 0 1to 5 Eoy^MrJriichJ'MyslLmgb X PowerTracl < provide s a complet e fifeight billin g & paymen t process . ww w .powartracl<globa l co m Charte ra Luxuriou s All-inclusiv e Crewe d Sailin g Yach t o f You r Dreams . Contac t Us I www.saildiadem.co m Today' s Headline s

• Study ; U.S . Ha s Mos t Expensiv e O Bill s NP R • Japan' s Econom y Rebound s I n 2n < NP R • Oi l dip s belo w $6 6 CN N Mone y • Capita l On e U.S . credi t car d defau l Jul y Reuter s • Future s Movers : Crud e oi l price s d a barre l i n Asi a Marl<etWatc h • Calif . Lawmaker s T o Reduc e Priso r NP R • Obam a Talce s Healt h Car e Battl e T Peopl e NP R

F r.iL%fiiL & ZeJtzJlaehts-Ln t Today s Buyin g Opportunitie s Ar e Endles s O n Luxur y Yacht s Fo rSal e www.FraserzYachts.co m 

### V H Ad a b y Googl e Ma p & Direction s Clic k her e t o se e a ma p fo rthi s busines s Brows e th e Corter a Busines s Director y t o fin d othe rcompanie s lik e HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C

• Busines s Directory A- Z • Today' s Ho t Compan y Profile s • Recentl y Update d Compan y Profile s Today' s Ho t Compan y Profile s

• HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C • CRAWFOR D AUTOMOTIV E • AGRI-SYSTEM S SYSTEM S WEST i r • LI N P A C MATERIAL S HANDLIN G • GATEWA

Y SHEET S • E PLA Y LL C • HARDWOO D ARTISAN S • PROPERT

Y RESOURC E NETWOR K • CHVAL

A LA W OFFIC E ^m^^ ^ • BRIM/NABORSINVES " I certif y tJHS-i i 6.ru e ca'p y EXHIBI T « ? Cc-a. )



### http://start.cortera.com/company/research/k3pOlyp7o/hanison-yacht-sales-inc / 8/17/200 9

### HARRISON YACHT SALP S INC , 106 WELL S C V ROAD , GRASONVILLE , MD , 216.. . Pag e 3 of 3 ( I

HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C Busines s Profil e b y Corter a

• Star t wit h thi s fre e repor t o n HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C tha t provide s th e basics . The i yo u nee d t o di g deeper , acces s ou rpremiu m insight s fo rHARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C includin g enhance d demographics , executives , busines s hierarchies , paymen t behavio r& scores , publi c record s an d mor e • Navigat e HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C an d it s busines s relationship s wit h ou rcorporat e informatio n • Ge t sale s Insight s o n HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C suc h a s competitors , executives , fina i information , an d shippin g spen d • Ensure HARRISO N YACH T SALE S IN C i s a goo d aedi t ris k wit h detaile d busines s credi t r e an d paymen t behavio rinformatio n Sponsore d Result s Chitilt a

Enjd.ihe.Bight.YaQh t SM«.9-.SupRl.ij^ ^ Searc h a worl d o f Yach t Sale s supplier s & fin d th e partne ryo u need . Success.Alibaba.co m Yacb t SaLeslnf o Fin d yach t sales i Internationa l yach t sales . Compare247,u s Yacht s fo rSal e Discove rno w i s th e bes t tim e t o bu y yachts . www . yachtsforsaleweb , ne t

Abou t Corter

a Products Newsroo m eCredI t Reques t Remova l RS Th e informatio n containe d I n thi s compan y profil e I s compile d fro m thir d part y sources , Includin g bu t no t limite d t availabl e dat a sources . Tties e source s ma y no t b e accurate , complete , o rup-to-date . Corter a make s n o represen t responsibilit y fbr , th e accuracy , completeness , o rcurrency o f ttt e Infbrmatlo n containe d herein , mor e Thes e source s Indicat e tha t busines s activit y I s bein g conducte d fro m th e locatio n show n I n thi s busines s profile . I profil e b e removed , dic k

here . © Copyrigh t 200 9 Cortera , Inc . Al l Pag e Serve d 08/17/200 9 09:28:0 6 A M - A i 

### I certif y t tru e

' •ut e 

### http://start.cortera.com/company/research/k3p01yp7o/harrison-yacht-sales-inc / 8/17/200 9