Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 28, 2009 / Notices 19201 

listed above, the following margins 

apply: 

Company Final Margin Amended Final Margin 

Dongbu ................................................................................................................................ 1.85 1.90 

POSCO ................................................................................................................................ 0.53 0.53 

HYSCO ................................................................................................................................ 1.57 1.52 

Review – Specific Average1 ................................................................................................ 5.01 5.01 

1The review-specific average rate is applicable to LG Chem., Ltd., and Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd. This rate is based on the weighted average of the margins calculated for those companies selected for individual review, excluding de minimis margins or margins based entirely on adverse facts available, and do not change after recalculating the margins for Dongbu, POSCO and HYSCO. 

Assessment 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department 

calculated importer–specific duty 

assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 

of the total antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the examined 

sales for that importer. Where the 

assessment rate is above de minimis, we 

will instruct CBP to assess duties on all 

entries of subject merchandise by that 

importer. The Department intends to 

issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of these amended final 

results of review. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This 

clarification applies to POR entries of 

subject merchandise produced by 

companies examined in this review (i.e., 

companies for which a dumping margin 

was calculated) where the companies 

did not know that their merchandise 

was destined for the United States. In 

such instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the all– 

others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

final results of this administrative 

review for all shipments of CORE from 

Korea entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of these final 

results, as provided by section 751(a) of 

the Act: (1) for companies covered by 

this review, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate listed above; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies 

other than those covered by this review, 

the cash deposit rate will be the 

company–specific rate established for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less–thanfair–value investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recent 

period for the manufacturer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the producer is a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the investigation, the cash deposit 

rate will be 17.70 percent, the all–others 

rate established in the less–than-fair– 

value investigation. These deposit 

requirements shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent increase in antidumping 

duties by the amount of antidumping 

and/or countervailing duties 

reimbursed. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also is the only reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

These amended final results of 

administrative review and notice are 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and (h), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.224. 

Dated: April 22, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–9676 Filed 4–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

C–580–818 

Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Copyak, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2209. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 17, 1993, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

countervailing duty order on corrosion– 

resistant carbon steel flat products 

(CORE) from Korea. See Countervailing 

Duty Orders and Amendments of Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determinations: Certain Steel Products 

from Korea, 58 FR 43752 (August 17, 

1993). On August 1, 2008, the 

Department published a notice of 

‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative 

Review’’ of this countervailing duty 

order. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 73 

FR 44966 (August 1, 2008). In 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we published a notice 

of initiation of the administrative review 


erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
19202 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 28, 2009 / Notices 

on September 30, 2008, for the 2008 

period of review (POR). See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 73 FR 56795 

(September 30, 2008). The preliminary 

results for this review are currently due 

no later than May 4, 2009. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to issue the preliminary 

results of an administrative review 

within 245 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of an order for which 

a review is requested and the 

final results of review within 120 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend these deadlines to 

a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, 

respectively. 

We are awaiting supplemental 

information from the Government of 

Korea in this administrative review. 

Because the Department will require 

additional time to review and analyze 

this supplemental information and may 

issue further supplemental 

questionnaires, it is not practicable to 

complete this review within the 

originally anticipated time limit (i.e., by 

May 4, 2009). Therefore, the Department 

is extending the time limit for 

completion of the preliminary results by 

120 days to not later than August 31, 

2009, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 22, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–9674 Filed 4–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–X081 

Magnuson–Stevens Act Provisions; 

General Provisions for Domestic 

Fisheries; Application for Exempted 

Fishing Permits 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional 

Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries, 

Northeast Region, NMFS (Assistant 

Regional Administrator), has made a 

preliminary determination that an 

Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP) 

application contains all of the required 

information and warrants further 

consideration. This EFP would allow 

two commercial fishing vessels to 

temporarily retain undersize fish and 

fish in excess of possession limits for 

the purpose of data collection in 

support of research conducted by the 

Gulf of Maine Research Institute 

(GMRI). The Assistant Regional 

Administrator has made a preliminary 

determination that the activities 

authorized under this EFP would be 

consistent with the goals and objectives 

of the Summer Flounder, Scup, and 

Black Sea Bass Fishery Management 

Plan (FMP). However, further review 

and consultation may be necessary 

before a final determination is made to 

issue an EFP. Therefore, NMFS 

announces that the Assistant Regional 

Administrator proposes to recommend 

that an EFP be issued. 

Regulations under the Magnuson– 

Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act require publication of 

this notification to provide interested 

parties the opportunity to comment on 

applications for proposed EFPs. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 13, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit written 

comments by any of the following 

methods: 

• Email: DA9–103@noaa.gov. Include 

in the subject line ‘‘Comments on GMRI 

TED EFP.’’ 

• Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional 

Administrator, NMFS, NE Regional 

Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, 

Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside 

of the envelope ‘‘Comments on GMRI 

TED EFP.’’ 

• Fax: (978) 281–9135. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Bryant, Fishery Management 

Specialist, 978–281–9244. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: GMRI was 

selected by the NOAA Protected Species 

Branch to conduct a study titled, ‘‘Study 

Comparison in Flounder Trawl Gear.’’ 

The objective of this project is to test 

and compare the catch performance of 

a trawl net fitted with a NMFS turtle 

excluder device (TED) with a 

leatherback sea turtle opening to an 

identical net without a TED or opening 

in the summer flounder fishery. This 

objective would be accomplished by 

documenting catch rates of summer 

flounder and other finfish bycatch 

between the two trawl gear types and 

examining the effects of these gear types 

on summer flounder length frequencies. 

GMRI proposes to employ two 

commercial vessels that operate in the 

summer flounder fishery to conduct this 

research. Investigators propose to 

conduct approximately six 90-minute 

tows per day for 16 days, for a total of 

96 tows, during May — June 2009. The 

location would be performed in the 

Mid–Atlantic region, specifically the 

summer flounder fishing grounds off 

Delmarva and New Jersey north of the 

Summer Flounder Fishery Sea Turtle 

Protection Area. Investigators would 

weigh and measure all summer flounder 

and finfish bycatch collected in each 

tow and return everything but legal– 

sized summer flounder within regulated 

possession limits to the sea as quickly 

as possible. All legal catch would be 

sold. 

GMRI submitted a complete EFP 

application on April 13, 2009, 

requesting exemption from minimum 

fish size and possession limit 

regulations for the purpose of data 

collection prior to discard. Undersize 

fish and fish above the vessel’s 

possession limit would be returned to 

the sea as quickly as possible to 

minimize discard mortality. All other 

elements of these fishing trips would 

comply with fishing regulations. 

The applicant may request minor 

modifications and extensions to the EFP 

throughout the year. EFP modifications 

and extensions may be granted without 

further notice if they are deemed 

essential to facilitate completion of the 

proposed research and have minimal 

impacts that do not change the scope or 

impact of the initially approved EFP 

request. Any fishing activity conducted 

outside the scope of the exempted 

fishing activity would be prohibited. If 

the research project is terminated for 

any reason prior to completion, any 

unused funds collected from catch sold 

to pay for research expenses may be 

refunded to NOAA. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. 

Dated: April 22, 2009. 

Alan D. Risenhoover 

Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, 

National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–9646 Filed 4–27–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S 


erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES