## Date: November 6 , 2014

To: Jeff Telander , EPA/ OAQPS/SPPD

From: Kristin Sroka, RTI International

Subject : Development of Cost and Emission Reduction Impacts for the BSCP NESHAP

I. I ntroduction

In accordance with section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) established national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants

(NESHAP) on May 16, 2003

, for the brick and structural clay prod ucts (BSCP) manufacturing

industry. The NESHAP regulated emissions of hydrogen fluoride (HF)

, hydrogen chloride

(HCl), and particulate matter (PM)

— a surrogate for hazardous air pollutant (HAP) metals

— from

tunnel kilns located at BSCP facilities . On March 13, 2007, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the

emission standards for BSCP manufacturing due to issues associated with the methodology used

to determine the minimum regulatory “floors” for new and existing units

. 1 

## Therefore , the EPA is

proposing new standards for BSCP manufacturing, including standards for HF, HCl, chlorine

(Cl 2 

## ), mercury (Hg), and non

- Hg HAP metals (or PM surrogate)

.

The proposed standards include health

- based standards for acid gases (HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

## )

and maximum achievable control technology (MACT) numeric emission limits for Hg and non

Hg HAP metals (or PM surrogate). In developing the proposed standards, the EPA also

considered “beyond

- the

- floor” options for Hg and non

- Hg HAP metals, as well as alternative

standards for non

- Hg H AP metals (or PM surrogate ). The development of these standards and

options are documented in two memoranda, Risk Assessment to Determine a Health

- Based

Emission Limitation for Acid Gases for the Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing

Source Cat egory (Morris et al, 2014) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT)

Floor Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products (Raymond and Sroka, 2014). The

purpose of this memorandum is to present the methodology f or estimating the costs, emission

re ductions, and secondary impacts associated with these standards/options for the BSCP source

category . A background discussion of the types of costs, emission reductions, and secondary

impacts being estimated is provided in the memorandum Methodology and A ssumptions Used to

Estimate the Model Costs and Impacts of BSCP Air Pollution Control Devices (Holloway,

2014a).

1 

### Sierra Club v. EPA , 479 F.3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

## 2 Section II of this memorandum shows the nationwide baseline emissions for the BSCP

industry. Section III describes the development of the cost estimates for facilities that elect to

reduce emissions and become reclassified as synthetic area sources rather than major sources.

Section IV describes the assessment of what air pollution control devices (APCD) would be

needed for major source facilit ies to meet the proposed health

- based standards. Section V

describes the analysis of what APCD would be needed for tunnel kiln stacks to meet the

proposed MACT standards and presents the nationwide costs, emission reductions, and

secondary impacts associated with meeting all the proposed standards

. Section VI describes the

calculation of the nationwide costs, emission reductions, and secondary impacts associated the

beyond

- the

- floor options for non

- Hg HAP metals and Hg. Finally, Section VII describes the

calculation of the nationwide costs, emission reductions, and secondary impacts associated with

the alternative non

- Hg HAP metals standards.

II. Baseline Emissions

Uncontrolled emission factors, mod el kiln production rates, and model kiln operating

hours were developed as described in the memorandum Methodology and Assumptions Used to

Estimate the Model Costs and Impacts of BSCP Air Pollution Control Devices (Holloway,

2014 a ). The memorandum also do cuments control efficiencies and emissions reductions for

new/retrofit APCD installations. The efficiencies and emissions for existing (baseline) APCD,

including dry sorbent injection followed by a fabric filter (DIFF), d ry l ime s crubber and fabric

filter (DLS /FF )

, dry limestone adsorber (DLA), and spray dryer/electrostatic precipitator

(SD/ESP), were based on all the available test data (see the memorandum Test Data Used in

BSCP Proposed Rule (Raymond, 2014)). Table 1 shows the control efficiencies of ba seline

DIFF, DLS/FF, and DLA for HF, HCl, Cl 2 

## , PM, and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

## ). Table 2 shows the

annual baseline emission estimates in tons per year (tpy) for small and large APCD.

Table 1. Control Efficiencies for Baseline APCD

APCD Type Efficiency

HF HCl Cl 2 

### PM a 

### SO 2

DIFF 98% 82% 88% 72% 48%

DLS/FF 98% 82% 88% 72% 48%

DLA 95% 30% 42% 20% 12%

a Control efficiencies for non

- Hg HAP metals and PM with p articles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter ( P M 2.5 ) are

estimated to be the same as the efficiency for PM.

## 3 Table 2 . Annual Baseline Emissions for E ach APCD

APCD

Type Size Emissions per APCD (tpy) a



### HF HCl Cl 2 

### Non

- Hg

HAP

Metals PM PM 2.5 

### SO 2

None Small 15.2 2.07 0.0884 0.0910 8.27 3.97 82.5

DIFF Small 0.304 0.372 0.0106 0.0255 2.32 1.11 42.9

DLS/FF Small 0.304 0.372 0.0106 0.0255 2.32 1.11 42.9

DLA Small 0.759 1.45 0.0512 0.0728 6.62 3.18 72.6

SD / ESP Small 17.5 4.28 0.543 0.00910 0.83 0.397 42.9

None Large 34.8 4.73 0.202 0.208 18.9 9.09 189

DIFF Large 0.695 0.851 0.0243 0.0583 5.30 2.55 98.3

DLS/FF Large 0.695 0.851 0.0243 0.0583 5.30 2.55 98.3

DLA Large 1.74 3.31 0.117 0.167 15.2 7.27 166

SD / ESP Large 37.5 9.14 1.16 0.0195 1.77 0.849 98.3

a There are no existing controls for mercury (Hg), so each small kiln stack is estimated to emit a baseline of

0.00160 tpy of Hg and each large kiln stack is estimated to emit a baseline of 0.00366 tpy of Hg.



## The inventory of BSCP kilns and facilities, including the APCD for each kiln stack is

presented in the memorandum Updated BSCP Inventory Database and Documentation

( Holloway , 2014 b ). To develop the nationwide baseline emission estimates, each kiln stack in

this inventory was assigned the appropriate baseline emissions from Table 2 based on the size

and type of APCD on the stack. Table 3 sum marizes the number of BSCP kiln stacks with e ach

type of APCD and the total nationwide baseline emissions.

Table 3. Nationwide Baseline Emissions Estimates for BSCP Tunnel Kilns

APCD

Type Size Count Emissions (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### Non

Hg

HAP

Metals Hg PM PM 2.5 

### SO 2

None Small 74 1,120 153 6.54 6.73 0.118 612 294 6,110

DIFF Small 1 0.304 0.372 0.0106 0.0255 0.0016 0 2.32 1.11 42.9

DLS/FF Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DLA Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SD / ESP Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

None Large 36 1,250 170 7.28 7.50 0.132 682 327 6,800

DIFF Large 13 9.04 11.1 0.316 0.758 0.0475 68.9 33.1 1,280

DLS/FF Large 1 0.695 0.851 0.0243 0.0583 0.00366 5.30 2.55 98.3

DLA Large 2 4 4 1.7 79.5 2. 82 4. 00 0.0 877 3 64 1 75 3,99 0

SD / ESP Large 1 37.5 9.14 1.16 0.0195 0.00366 1.77 0.849 98.3



### Total 15 0 2,4 6 0 42 4 18. 1 19. 1 0.39 4 1,7 4 0 8 33 18, 4 00

## 4 III. Estimate of Cost to Facilities to Become Synthetic Area Sources

Given the large number of small entities in the BSCP industry, it is anticipated that

owners and operators will explore the possibility of reducing emissions below the thresholds

defining a major source of HAP emissions ( potential to emit [PTE] 10 tpy of a single HAP or

25 tpy of all HAP combined) and becoming reclassified as a synthetic area source so that their

sources would not be subject to the BSCP NESHAP. If an owner or operator estimates that the

cost to become a synthetic area source is less than the compliance costs for the BSCP NESHAP

, it is expected that the owner or operator would elect to become a synthetic area source. The

methodology behind this anal ysis is described in this section; Appendix A shows the detailed

calculations for each BSCP tunnel kiln and facility.

T o compare the cost to become a synthetic area source to the BSCP NESHAP

compliance costs, the cost for each facility to become a syntheti c area source was estimated

based on the facility’s current emission estimates and whether installation of a DLA would

reduce the acid gas emissions below major source thresholds. Design capacities are available for

each tunnel kiln at each major source f acility in the BSCP industry ( Holloway , 2014 b ) , and test

data are available for some of those kilns (Raymond, 2014)

. The design capacities, site

- specific

test data (where available; emission factors were used if test data were not available), and model

co ntrol device parameters were used to estimate potential emissions from each kiln before and

after control.

For simplicity, the analysis was limited to HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

## , since those are the

predominant HAP emitted from BSCP kilns by mass

. If HF, HCl, and/o r Cl 2 

## test data were

available for a kiln, the emission factor calculated from the test in units of pounds of emissions

per ton of bricks (lb/ton) was used to estimate potential emissions

. If not, the average lb/ton

emission factor for the existing contro l device (calculated based on the available BSCP test data

for those pollutants) was used.

A code was assigned to each kiln indicating the source of the data. Since the Cl 2 

## data set

was limited, the main focus was the source of HF and HCl data. If both HF and HCl emissions

were based on test data, the code of “2” was assigned; if the emissions for one pollutant w ere

based on test data but the emissions for the other w ere based on the average emission factor, a

code of “1” was assigned, and if no test data were available for that kiln, a code of “0” was

assigned. The HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

## emissions for each kiln were then calculated in tpy based on the

kiln design capacity, assuming 8

, 760 hours of operation per year (in order to estimate the

maximum P TE), and then summed per kiln and then per facility.

The current status (i.e., major or synthetic area source) was estimated based on the

following assumptions:

• If both HF and HCl test data were available for all kilns at the facility (code of 2) and

the t otal facility estimated PTE was less than 90 percent of each of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

• If a mix of test data and emission factors were used for the facility (code of 1) and the

total facility estimated PTE was less than 75 percent of each of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

## 5 • If no test data for any kilns at the facility were available (code of 0) and the total

facility estimated PTE was less than 60 percent of each of t he major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

It should be noted that to the EPA’s knowledge, all of the facilities in the analysis are

currently classified as major sources. The sources estimated to be synthetic area sources in this

analysis are facilities with emissions data suggesting that they could apply for synthetic area

status with their permitting authority without needing to add APCD or reduce the kiln production

rates ( i.e. , becoming a synthetic area source would require minimal cost). Based on the analysis,

15 of the 86 current major sources have low enough PTE that they could become synthetic area

sources with minimal cost ( i.e. , submitting paperwork to their permitting a uthority for a formal

change in classification)

.

The next step was to assign an action to be taken and estimate “controlled” emissions. If

the kiln was already controlled, or if the facility was already considered a synthetic area source

based on current emissions, the action was “None”; otherwise it was “Install DLA.” (For the

purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that the cost to retrofit currently

- controlled tunnel kilns

would not be less than the cost to comply with the BSCP NESHAP.) A few uncont rolled kilns

were manually adjusted to “None” for facilities with multiple kilns that could become synthetic

area sources without controlling all kilns. See Appendix A for these designations.

Controlled emissions for kilns with an action of “Install DLA” were estimated as a

reduction from the individual kiln PTE for HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

## based on the DLA control

efficiencies presented in Table 1. If the action was “None,” controlled emissions were estimated

to be equivalent to the PTE (as calculated above). T he “controlled” emissions for each kiln at

each facility were then summed.

The next step was to determine what the major/area s ource status would be after DLA

were installed (where possible), based on the following assumptions:

• If no DLA would be installed , both HF and HCl test data were available for all kilns

at the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 90 percent of the

major source thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area without additional

control

.

• If no DLA would b e installed, a mix of test data and emission factors were used for

the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 75 percent of the major

source thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area without additional

control

.

• If no DLA would be installed, no test data were available for any kilns at the facility,

and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 60 percent of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area without additional control

.

• If at least one DLA would be installed, both HF and HCl test data were available for

all kilns at the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 80 percent of

the major source thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area after control

.

• If a t least one DLA would be installed, a mix of test data and emission factors were

used for the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 65 percent of

the major source thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area after control

.

## 6 • If at least one DLA would be installed, no test data were available for any kilns at the

facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 50 percent of the major

source thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area after control

.

After determining major/area source status, the capital and annual costs of installing a

DLA were estimated, if doing so was estimated to enable the facility to become synthetic area.

The DLA costs were estimated using model costs developed based on cost and p arameter

information from BSCP industry responses to the 2008 section 114 survey (Holloway, 2014 a ).

The costs for each kiln were then summed for each facility considered synthetic area after

control. If the facility would still be major even with a DLA i nstalled on each uncontrolled kiln,

the costs were left blank. If the potential action was “None” ( i.e. , the kiln was already controlled

or the facility was already expected to be a synthetic area source ), the facility costs were

estimated as $0.

IV. Cost and Emission Reduction Estimates for Meeting Health

- Based Standards

For the acid gases HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

## , a health

- based emission limit was developed for

acid gases under CAA section 112(d)(4)

. The rationale behind the standard is discussed in the

pre amble to the BSCP proposed rule. The development of the facility

- level health

- based

emission limit

, 250 tons per year (tpy) of HCl

- equivalent ( 57 pounds per hour (lb/hr) of HCl

equivalent ) , is documented in the memorandum Risk Assessment to Determine a He alth

- Based

Emission Limitation for Acid Gases for the Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing

Source Category (Morris et al, 2014). The methodology for estimating the impacts of meeting

this standard is described in this section; Appendix B shows the detailed calculations for each

BSCP tunnel kiln and facility.

The equivalency of HCl with HF and Cl 2 

## is based on the chronic Reference

Concentration (RfC) values for each of the acid gases. The RfC for HCl is 2 0 micrograms per

cubic meter ( μg /m 3 

## ), th e RfC for HF is 14 μg /m 3 

## , and the RfC for Cl 2 

## is 0. 15 μg /m 3 

## ( Morris et al,

2014). Therefore, the following equation can be used to calculate the HCl

- equivalent emissions

for an individual kiln :



##  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+      

 

 

 

 

+ =

2 2

Cl HCl

Cl

HF HCl

HF HCl i 

## RfC RfC

E RfC RfC

E E E

where:

E

= HCl

- equivalent emission s, lb/hr

E HCl 

## = emissions of HCl, lb/hr

E HF 

## = emission s of HF, lb/hr

E Cl2 

## = emission s of Cl 2 

## , lb/hr

RfC HCl 

## = r eference concentration for HCl

, 20 μg /m 3



## RfC HF 

## = r eference concentration for HF

, 14 μg /m 3

## 7 RfC Cl2 

## = r eference concentration for chlorine , 0.15 μg /m 3



## Design capacities are available for each tunnel kiln at each major source facility in the

BSCP industry

, and permitted capacities are available for some tunnel kilns ( Holloway , 2014 b ).

Test data are available for some of the kilns in the BSCP industry (Raymond, 2014). If test data

were not available for all acid gas emissions ( i.e. , HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

## ), emission factors were used

to estimate emissions. This information was used in the equation above to calculate an HCl

equivalent value for eac h kiln. The HCl

- equivalent values were summed for each kiln at a

facility and then compared to the health

- based emission limit

. If a facility did not meet the

health

- based emission limit , the type of control needed was determined based on factors such as

the current kiln APCD, the number of kilns at the facility, and how much the HCl

- equivalent

emissions exceeded the health

- based emission limit . (Note that the final costs and emission

reductions for each kiln were not calculated until the impacts for mee ting the PM/non

- Hg HAP

metals and Hg limits were assessed as described in Section V of this memorandum .)

As shown in Appendix B, all but one BSCP facility could meet the health

- based emission

limit with current control configurations . The facility not meeting the limit is Belden Brick

Company’s facility in Sugarcreek, Ohio, with an HCl

- equivalent estimate of 120 lb/hr from a

total of 10 tunnel kilns, some of which are vented together through a common stack or APCD.

Most of the HCl

- equivalent emissions (about 71 percent) are generated by the three kilns

controlled by a SD/ESP at the part of the facility known as Plant #8. Removing the SD/ESP and

retrofitting the stack with a DIFF is expected to reduce HCl

- equivalent emissions well below the

health

- based emission limit , even without reducing emissions from any of the other seven kilns

at this facility.

V. Cost and Emission Reduction Estimates for Meeting Hg and non

- Hg HAP Metals

Proposed Standards

There are 17 1 tunnel kilns with 15 0 stacks at facilities currently classified as major

sources in the BSCP industry. There are 2 2 tunnel kilns with 1 8 stacks at the 1 4 facilities

identified in Section III of this memorandum that could become synthetic area sources with

minimal cost, leaving 149 tunnel kilns wit h 132 stacks potentially impacted by the proposed Hg

and non

- Hg HAP metals standards. A summary of these kilns by size and APCD is shown in

Table 4; the stack counts for these kilns were used for all remaining analyses in this

memorandum

.

Table 4. Summar y of Major Source BSCP Kilns and APCD

Kiln Size APCD Type Number of Kilns Number of Kiln Stacks

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 9 8

DLA 18 14

None 32 31

Small Kilns SD/ESP 3 1

None 87 78

Total 149 132

## 8 The proposed BSCP NESHAP includes MACT standards for Hg and for non

- Hg HAP

metals (with PM as a surrogate) (see the memorandum Maximum Achievable Control

Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products (Raymond and

Sroka, 2014) for additional information on these standards) . As noted previously, test data were

available for some kilns in the industry (including major and synthetic area sources). Data on

PM emissions were available for about 40 percent of the kilns, while Hg and non

- Hg HAP

metals data were only available for abou t 10 percent or less of the kilns (Raymond, 2014).

Therefore, rather than evaluating the impacts of the standards on a kiln

- by

- kiln basis, as was

done for the health

- based emission limit, several assumptions were needed to evaluate the

impacts on the whol e industry. This analysis was completed in a series of four steps, described

in the remainder of this section.

Step 1: Compare Test Data to Emission Limits

The first step was to compare the data available with the proposed emission limits to get

an estim ate of the percentage of tunnel kilns in the industry that could meet the limits with

current APCD configurations. Table 5 shows the percentages for the PM and Hg lb/ton and

concentration emission limits by kiln size and the most common types of APCD (for PM)

.

Table 5. Percentages of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to Proposed Emission Limits

Pollutant Kiln Size APCD Type Number of

Kiln Stacks

with Data a 

### Percentage of Kilns Meeting b



### lb/ton

Limit Concentration

Limit At Least

One Limit

PM Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 28 92.9% 92.9% 92.9%

DLA 30 70.0% 76.7% 86.7%

None 3 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%

Small Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 1 100% 100% 100%

DLA 0 ND ND ND

None 16 25.0% 62.5% 62.5%

Hg Large Kilns All 18 16.7% 55.6% 55.6%

Small Kilns All 1 100% 100% 100%

a PM data were also available for one stack controlled by a SD/ESP (small kilns) and three large kilns with wet

scrubbers. Those kilns are not shown in the counts for PM emissions data because the SD/ESP is expected to be

replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum ) and all three wet scrubbers are located at synthetic area

sources, so the results for those APCD are not needed for purposes of estimating impacts on major source

facilities. In addition, the analysis does not assume that wet scrubbers would be installed or retrofitted to meet the

proposed PM standards. These kilns are included in the counts for Hg data; because none of the APCD currently

in use in the BSCP indus try target Hg reductions, the ability to meet the Hg standards is not expected to be affected

by type of current APCD.

b ND = no test data available for that pollutant, kiln size, and APCD combination.



## Of the large kilns with both PM and Hg data, seven of the 18 kiln stacks meet at least one

of the PM and one of the Hg limits. ( One of these stacks is controlled with a wet scrubber and is

not included in the kiln stack counts with PM data in Table 5 , as indicated in footnote a to

Table 4.) For small ki lns, Hg data are only available for three kilns vented together and

controlled with a SD/ESP; this device also meets the PM concentration limit for small kilns.

## 9 Step 2 : Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The percentages from Table 5 wer e applied to the kiln s tack counts in Table 4 to

determine the number of kiln stack s estimated to be able to meet the proposed MACT floors.

From these estimates, preliminary estimates of the number of APCD needed to be installed were

developed using the f ollowing criteria:

• If the kiln is expected to meet both a PM and a Hg limit, no additional APCD is

needed

.

• If an uncontrolled kiln or a kiln with a DLA can meet a Hg limit but none of the PM

limit s , a FF would be needed

.

• If an uncontrolled kiln or a kiln w ith a DLA can not meet either of the Hg limits , a FF

with activated carbon injection ( ACI ) would be needed regardless of whether the kiln

can meet a PM limit , as the FF would be needed for the capture of the activated

carbon injected into the gas stream.

• If a kiln with a DIFF or DLS/FF cannot meet either of the Hg limits, ACI would be

added to the existing control device.

Table 6 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of APCD needed based only on

the se criteria and the percentages in Table 5 , rounded to the nearest whole number. If multiple

kilns were vented together, only one APCD was assigned to the stack. As noted in Step 3 , there

are two other factors to take into account to determine the final estimate of the number of APCD

needed and the impacts on the major source kilns.

Table 6. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and P reliminary Estimate of APCD

to B e Installed

Kiln Size Existing APCD

Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

PM Limit Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

Hg Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install FF Install FF

with ACI Add ACI

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 7 a 4 0 0 4

DLA 14 12 8 0 6 0

None 31 10 17 7 14 0

Small Kilns SD/ESP b 1 0 1 0 0 0

None 78 49 78 29 0 0

Total 132 79 108 36 20 3

a Because the one kiln stack not meeting the PM lb/ton or concentration limits is already controlled with a PM APCD,

none of the preliminary assumptions apply. If this kiln stack cannot meet the lb/hr non

- Hg HAP metals limit, or if it is

not located at a facility that could become a synthetic area source by installing a DLA on an uncontrolled kiln, the

DIFF or DLS/FF would have to be retrofit with a new DIFF.

b The SD/ESP is expected to be replaced wit h a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum).

## 10 Step 3 : Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

consider ing the impact of the lb/hr limits for Hg and total non

- Hg HAP me tals

. The total non

- Hg

HAP metal s limit is expected to provide additional flexibility to tunnel kiln owners and

operators, particularly for small tunnel kilns . Where total non

- Hg HAP metals lb/hr data were

available, the values were compiled for each kil n. If PM data were available but non

- Hg HAP

metals data were not, the total non

- Hg HAP metal lb/hr value was calculated using the average

ratio of metals to PM emissions in BSCP stack tests (Raymond, 2014). The non

- Hg HAP metal

values for each kiln are shown in Appendix C. While it is also expected that the lb/hr limit for

Hg would provide additional flexibility to tunnel kiln owners and operators, again particularly

for small tunnel kilns, the impact of the lb/hr Hg limit is not assessed quantitati vely in this

analysis

. I nstead, it was expected that most kilns that could meet the lb/hr Hg limit could also

meet either the lb/ton li mit or the concentration limit.

The other factor to be taken into account in determining the number of APCD required to

be installed is the number of kilns located at facilities that could elect to become synthetic area

sources. The cost for each facility to do so was estimated as described in Section III of this

memorandum. However, as noted previously in this section, b ecause test data are not available

for every tunnel kiln in the industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each kiln and

facility. Therefore, the cost to become a synthetic area source could not be compared directly to

the cost of compliance. For example, while the analysis estimates that the BSCP facility in

Thomasville, North Carolina, owned by Cunningham Brick Company could become a synthetic

area source at an annual cost of $410,000 (see Appendix A), test data are not available to show

the faci lity’s exact level of emissions. If performance testing of the tunnel kiln at this facility

showed that the kiln already meets the proposed limits, then installing a control device to become

a synthetic area source would not be necessary.

Therefore, the p reliminary APCD estimates in Table 6 , the total non

- Hg HAP metal s

lb/hr limit, the ability of certain facilities to become synthetic area were considered together on a

more general basis

. The following assumptions were used to refine the preliminary APCD

estimates:

• For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it was assumed that the kiln stack not meeting

either the PM lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the total non

- Hg HAP metal s

lb/hr limit. It was also assumed that one of the kiln stack s not meeting t he Hg lb/ton

or concentration limits would meet the Hg lb/hr limit.

• For large kilns with a DLA , it was assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the

Hg lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the Hg lb/hr limit. It was also assumed

that this kiln stack is one of the 12 stacks that can meet one of the PM limits, so no FF

would be needed.

• Based on the results of the analysis described in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 12 large uncontrolled kiln stacks are located at facilities that could become

synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stacks . F or large

uncontr olled kilns, it was assumed that owners or operators of three

- fourths of these

kiln stacks, or nine total stacks, w ould elect to install a DLA. To be conservative, it

## 11 was estimated that most of the remaining kiln stacks would not be able to meet any of

the Hg limits.

• I t was expected that most small uncontrolled kilns would be able to meet the total

non

- Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit and would not need to install DLA to become a

synthetic area source. Therefore , for small uncontrolled kilns, i t was assumed th at a

little over 5 percent of the total kiln stacks, or five total stacks, were located at

facilities that would elect to become synthetic area sources by installing a DLA. It

was also assumed that 21 of the 24 remaining kiln stacks not meeting the PM lb/ ton

or concentration limits (88 percent) would be able to meet the total non

- Hg HAP

metals lb/hr limit.

The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Estimate of APCD to B e

Installed

Kiln Si ze Existing

APCD Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add

ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a 

### No

Change

in APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 0 0 3 0 0 5

DLA 14 0 5 0 0 0 9

None 31 1 11 0 0 9 10

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 78 3 0 0 0 5 70

Total 132 4 16 3 1 14 93

a See Section IV of this memorandum.



## Step 4 : Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide costs and impacts was to apply m odel APCD

costs, emission reductions, and secondary impacts to the APCD counts shown in Table 7. The

model APCD size is based on the design capacity(ies) of the kiln(s) routed to that emission

point/APCD. For example, two small kiln s vented together with a total design capacity of less

than 10 tph would be controlled with a small APCD , whereas two small kilns vented together

that have a total design capacity of more than 10 tph would be controlled with a large APCD

.

As noted in Secti on IV of this memorandum , Belden Brick Company’s facility in

Sugarcreek, Ohio, was identified as not meeting the health

- based standard with the current

APCD at the kiln, so the emissions at the kilns were evaluated individually. The three kilns

routed to t he SD/ESP at Sugarcreek are small kilns, but the sum of the total kiln capacity vented

to the SD/ESP is greater than 10 tph. Similarly, the Sugarcreek facility has three small kilns

vented to one uncontrolled stack with a total kiln capacity of greater tha n 10 tph. Therefore, f or

purposes of this analysis, the DIFF installed to replace the SD/ESP would be a large DIFF

, and a

large FF would be needed on one of the small kiln stacks. The other two FF and the five DLA

shown in Table 7 to be installed on small kilns nationwide would be small APCD.

## 12 Table 8 shows the summary of nationwide costs for BSCP kilns at major sources, Table 9

shows the summary of nationwide e mission reductions for BSCP kilns at major sources, and

Table 10 shows the summary of nationwide s econdary impacts for BSCP kilns at major sources

.

Table 8. Summary of Nationwide Costs for Major Sources to Meet Proposed Standards

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Unit

Capital

Cost a 

### Unit

Annual

Cost a 

### Number

of

APCD Total

Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $96,482 3 $440,090 $289,446

DLA Install FF with ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,48 8 5 $8,233,483 $3,112,440

SD/ESP Retrofit with a DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,5 85 1 $3,820,000 $943,585

None Install FF Large $ 1,500,000 $ 52 6,006 2 $3,000,000 $1,052,012

None Install FF with ACI Large $ 1,646,697 $622,48 8 11 $18,113,663 $6,847,368

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $409,722 9 $13,405,928 $3,687,499

None Install FF Small $1,200,000 $437,84 5 2 $2,400,000 $875,690

None Install DLA Small $1,096,473 $310,036 5 $5,482,363 $1,550,180

Total Nationwide 38 $54,895,5 27 $18,358,221

a Unit costs from Holloway (2014a), except for the DLA capital and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table were increased to account for the fact that if a DLA is installed for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it would need to be installed earlier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for a ll APCD for purposes of this analysis, a DLA was

expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other APCD, increasing the capital cost by about 3 percent

(calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 ). The total annual cost increas ed due to the

increase in the annualized capital cost.

## 13 Table 9. Summary of Nationwide Emission Reductions for Major Sources to Meet Proposed Standards

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Emissions

Type Number

of

APCD Emissions Reductions (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### HAP

Metals PM Hg SO 2 

### PM 2.5 a

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.003 11 0 0

Total 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.00932 0 0

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0.00311 0 6.7 3

Total 5 0 0 0 0.77 70.0 0.0155 0 33.6

SD/ESP Retrofit

with a DIFF Large Unit 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0

Total 1 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0

None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55

Total 2 0 0 0 0.392 35.6 0 0 17.1

None Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0.00311 0 8.55

Total 11 0 0 0 2.15 196 0.0342 0 94.0

None Install DLA Large Unit 33.0 1.42 0.0850 0.0417 3.79 0 22.7 1.82

Total 9 297 12.8 0.765 0.375 34.1 0 204 16.4

None Install FF Small Unit 0 0 0 0.0855 7.78 0 0 3.73

Total 2 0 0 0 0.171 15.6 0 0 7.46

None Install DLA Small Unit 14.4 0.620 0.0371 0.0182 1.65 0 9.90 0.79 4

Total 5 72.1 3.10 0.186 0.0910 8.27 0 49.5 3.9 7

Total Nationwide 38 40 7 24.2 2.09 3.95 359 0.0590 255 173

a Estimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.

## 14 Table 10. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for Major Sources to Meet Proposed Standards a



### Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Emissions

Type Number

of

APCD Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr Solid

waste

impacts,

tpy Waste

water

impacts,

gpy Secondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)

PM PM 2.5 

### CO NO

x 

### SO 2

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large Unit 553 17.9

-- 0.00408 0.00137 0.00688 0.0547 0.159

Total 3 1,659 53.8 0.0122 0.00410 0.0206 0.164 0.478

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 13,116 35.7

-- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78

Total 5 65,580 179 0.484 0.162 0.816 6.48 18.9

SD/ESP Retrofit with

a DIFF Large Unit

- 24,555 12.9

- 4,063

- 0.181

- 0.0607

- 0.305

- 2.43

- 7.07

Total 1

- 24,555 12.9

- 4,063

- 0.181

- 0.0607

- 0.305

- 2.43

- 7.07

None Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8

-- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62

Total 2 25,126 35.6 0.185 0.0622 0.313 2.48 7.24

None Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 13,116 35.7

-- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78

Total 11 144,275 393 1.06 0.357 1.79 14.3 41.6

None Install DLA Large Unit 7,424 457

-- 0.0548 0.0184 0.0923 0.734 2.14

Total 9 66,812 4,116 0.493 0.165 0.831 6.60 19.2

None Install FF Small Unit 9,620 7.78

-- 0.0710 0.0238 0.120 0.951 2.77

Total 2 19,240 15.6 0.142 0.0476 0.239 1.90 5.54

None Install DLA Small Unit 3,741 306

-- 0.0276 0.00925 0.0465 0.370 1.08

Total 5 18,705 1,529 0.138 0.0463 0.233 1.85 5.39

Total Nationwide 38 316,84 2 6,33 5

- 4,063 2.3 4 0.78 4 3.9 4 31. 3 9 1

. 3

a A negative increase in secondary impacts would be equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

## 15 VI. Cost and Emission Reduction Estimates for Meeting non

- Hg HAP Metals and Hg

Beyond

- the

- Floor Options

As noted in the preamble to the proposed rule, the beyond

- the

- floor options considered

for BSCP tunnel kilns were emission limits equal to the new source limits for Hg and for non

- Hg

HAP metals (with PM as a surrogate). The development of these limits is documented in the

memorandum Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor Analysis for Brick and

Structural Clay Products (Raymond and Sroka, 2014). The process to estimate costs

, emission

reduction s, and secondary impacts for the beyond

- the

- floor o ptions is the same four

- step process

described in Section V of this memorandum. The Hg and for non

- Hg HAP metals beyond

- the

floor options were considered separately to clearly evaluate the impacts of applying each option.

When considering each beyond

- the

- floor option, all other standards were applied as proposed,

and the impacts calculated in Section V associated with the proposed standards were removed to

calculate incremental impacts for the beyond

- the

- floor option.

A. Non

- Hg HAP Metals Beyond

- the

- Floo r Option

Step 1: Compare Test Data to Emission Limits

Table 11 shows the percentages for the PM lb/ton and concentration emission limits by

kiln size and the most common types of APCD for the non

- Hg HAP metals beyond

- the

- floor

option.

Table 11. Percentag es of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to PM Beyond

- the

- Floor Limit

Kiln Size APCD Type Number of

Kiln Stacks

with Data a 

### Percentage of Kilns Meeting b



### lb/ton Limit Concentration

Limit At Least

One Limit

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 28 28.6 % 32.1 % 35.7 %

DLA 30 3.33 % 13.3 % 13.3 %

None 3 33.3 % 33.3 % 33.3%

Small Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 1 100 % 100% 100%

DLA 0 ND ND ND

None 16 6.25 % 18.8 % 18.8 %

a PM data were also available for one stack controlled by a SD/ESP (small kilns) and three large kilns with wet

scrubbers. Those kilns are not shown in the counts for PM emissions data because the SD/ESP is expected to be

replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum) and all three wet scrubbers are located at synthetic area

sources, so the results for those APCD are not needed for purposes of estimating impacts on major source

facilities. In addition, the analysis does not assume that wet scrubb ers would be installed or retrofitted to meet the

proposed PM standards.

b ND = no test data available for that pollutant, kiln size, and APCD combination.



## Step 2 : Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

For the non

- Hg HAP metals beyond

- the

- floor option, the percentages from Table 11 were

applied to the kilns in Table 4 for non

- Hg HAP metals/PM emissions, and the percentages from

Table 5 were applied to the kilns in Table 4 for Hg emissions. From these estimates, preliminary

## 16 estimates of th e number of APCD needed to be installed were developed using same criteria as

described in Section V of this memorandum.

Table 1 2 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of APCD needed for the non

- Hg

HAP metals beyond

- the

- floor option based only on th ese criteria and the percentages in Tables 4

and 11, rounded to the nearest whole number. If multiple kilns were vented together, only one

A PCD was assigned to the stack.

Table 12. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Preliminary Estimate of APCD

to B e Installed for the Non

- Hg HAP Metals Beyond

- the

- Floor Option

Kiln

Size Existing

APCD

Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number of

Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

PM Limit Number of

Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

Hg Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Retrofit

with

DIFF Retrofit

with

DIFF and

ACI

Large

Kilns DIFF or

DLS/FF 8 3 4 0 0 1 4

DLA 14 2 8 6 6 0 0

None 31 10 17 7 14 0 0

Small

Kilns SD/ESP 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

None 78 15 78 63 0 0 0

Total 132 30 108 76 20 2 4



## Step 3 : Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

considering the impact of the proposed Hg lb/hr limit and the beyond

- the

- floor total non

- Hg

HAP metals lb/hr limit, as well as the number of kilns located at facilities that could elect to

become synthetic area sources. A s noted previously in this memorandum , because test data are

not available for every tunnel kiln in the industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each

kiln and facili ty. Therefore, the preliminary APCD estimates in Table 1 2

, the lb/hr limit s

, and

the ability of certain facili ties to become synthetic area were considered together on a more

general basis

. The following assumptions were used to refine the preliminary AP CD estimates:

• For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it was assumed that two of the kiln stack s not

meeting either the beyond

- the

- floor PM lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the

beyond

- the

- floor total non

- Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit and that a third k iln stack is

located at a facility that would elect to be reclassified as a synthetic area source . It

was also assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the proposed Hg lb/ton or

concentration limits would meet the proposed Hg lb/hr limit.

• For large kilns with a DLA, it was assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the

proposed Hg lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the proposed Hg lb/hr limit. It

was also assumed that this kiln stack is one of the two stacks that can meet one of the

bey ond

- the

- floor PM limits, so no FF would be needed.

• Based on the results of the analysis described in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 12 large uncontrolled kiln stacks are located at facilities that could become

## 17 synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stacks. Because the

beyond

- the

- floor total non

- Hg HAP metals/PM limits are more stringent than the

proposed non

- Hg HAP metals/PM limits, more facilities would be expected to install

one or more DL A to become a synthetic area source. Therefore, for large

uncontrolled kilns, it was assumed that owners or operators of 10 of those kiln stacks,

or one more than under the proposed standards, would elect to install a DLA. It was

expected that nine of th ese 10 are the same kiln stacks that would install a DLA as in

Section V of this memorandum and that the tenth kiln stack is one of those that would

not meet the proposed Hg limit.

• The biggest difference between the proposed limits and the non

- Hg HAP metal s

beyond

- the

- floor option would be seen f or small uncontrolled kilns

. Because of the

increase in stringency in the non

- Hg HAP metals and PM surrogate limits, more

facilities would elect to install DLA on uncontrolled kilns to become synthetic area

sources . Therefore, it was assumed that a little less than 60 percent of the total kiln

stacks, or 4 5 total stacks, were located at facilities that would elect to become

synthetic area sources by installing a DLA. Only three of the remaining kiln stacks

not mee ting the PM lb/ton or concentration limits would be able to meet the total non

Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit due to the increased stringency of this limit

.

The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 1 3

.

Table 13. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln S tacks and Estimate of APCD to be

Installed for the Non

- Hg HAP Metals Beyond

- the

- Floor Option

Kiln Size Existing

APCD Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add

ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a 

### No

Change

in APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 0 0 3 2 0 3

DLA 14 6 5 0 0 0 3

None 31 1 10 0 0 10 10

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 78 15 0 0 0 45 18

Total 132 22 15 3 3 55 34

a See Section IV of this memorandum.



## Step 4 : Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide costs and impacts for the non

- Hg HAP metals

beyond

- the

- floor option was to apply model APCD costs, emission reductions, and secondary

impacts to the APCD counts show n in Table 1 3

. The model APCD size is based on the design

capacity(ies) of the kiln(s) routed to that emission point/APCD. For example, two small kilns

vented together with a total design capacity of less than 10 tph would be controlled with a small

APCD , whereas two small kilns vented together that have a total design capacity of more than

10 tph would be controlled with a large APCD.

## 18 As noted in Section IV of this memorandum

, for purposes of this analysis, it was

estimated that the DIFF installed to rep lace the SD/ESP at Belden Brick Company’s facility in

Sugarcreek, Ohio would be a large DIFF. It was also estimated that three of the 15 FF and one

of the 45 DLA shown in Table 13 for small kilns would be controlling multiple kilns and would

therefore be large FF and a large DLA. The remaining APCD shown in Table 1 3 would be sized

for one kiln.

For the non

- Hg HAP metals beyond

- the

- floor option, Table 1 4 shows the summary of

nationwide costs, Table 1 5 shows the summary of nationwide emission reductions, an d Table 1 6

shows the summary of nationwide secondary impacts. Based on the incremental annual cost in

Table 1 4 and the incremental non

- Hg HAP metals emission reductions in Table 1 5 , the cost

effectiveness of the non

- Hg HAP metals beyond

- the

- floor option i s $7.96 million per additional

ton of non

- Hg HAP metals reduced.

Table 14. Summary of Nationwide Costs for the Non

- Hg HAP Metals Beyond

- the

- Floor

Option

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Unit

Capital

Cost a Unit

Annual

Cost a Number

of

APCD Total Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $96,482 3 $440,090 $289,446

DIFF or

DLS/FF Retrofit with a

DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,585 2 $7,640,000 $1,887,169

DLA Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 6 $9,000,000 $3,156,036

DLA Install FF with

ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,488 5 $8,233,483 $3,112,440

SD/ESP Retrofit with a

DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,585 1 $3,820,000 $943,585

None Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 4 $6,000,000 $2,104,024

None Install FF with

ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,488 10 $16,466,966 $6,224,880

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $409,722 11 $16,385,023 $4,506,944

None Install FF Small $1,200,000 $437,845 12 $14,400,000 $5,254,140

None Install DLA Small $1,096,473 $310,036 44 $48,244,791 $13,641,586

Total Nationwide 98 $130,630,354 $41,120,250

Total for Proposed Standards $54,895,527 $18,358,221

Incremental Nationwide Cost $75,734,827 $22,762,029

a Unit costs from Holloway (2014a), except for the DLA capital and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table were increased to account for the fact that if a DLA is installed for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it wou ld need to be installed earlier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for all APCD for purposes of this analysis, a DLA was

expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other APCD, increasing the capital cost by about 3 percent

(calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 ) . The total annual cost increased due to the

increase in the annualized capital cost.

## 19 Table 15. Summary of Emission Reductions for the Non

- Hg HAP Metals Beyond

- the

- Floor Option

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Emissions

Type Number

of

APCD Emissions Reductions (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### HAP

Metals PM Hg SO 2 

### PM 2.5 a

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.003 11 0 0

Total 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.00932 0 0

DIFF or

DLS/FF Retrofit

with a DIFF Large Unit 0.521 0.0594 0.00272 0.0458 4.17 0 1.39 2.00

Total 2 1.043 0.1187 0.00545 0.0917 8.33 0 2.78 4.00

DLA Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0 0 6.73

Total 6 0 0 0 0.925 84.1 0 0 40.4

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0.00311 0 6.7 3

Total 5 0 0 0 0.771 70.0 0.0155 0 33.6

SD/ESP Retrofit

with a DIFF Large Unit 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0

Total 1 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0

None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55

Total 4 0 0 0 0.783 71.2 0 0 34.2

None Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0.00311 0 8.55

Total 10 0 0 0 1.96 178 0.0311 0 85.5

None Install DLA Large Unit 33.0 1.42 0.0850 0.0417 3.79 0 22.7 1.82

Total 11 363 15.6 0.935 0.458 41.7 0 249 20.0

None Install FF Small Unit 0 0 0 0.0855 7.78 0 0 3.73

Total 12 0 0 0 1.026 93.3 0 0 44.8

None Install DLA Small Unit 14.4 0.620 0.0371 0.0182 1.65 0 9.90 0.79 4

Total 44 635 27.3 1.633 0.801 72.8 0 436 34.9

Total Nationwide 98 1,036 51.3 3.71 6.81 620 0.0559 689 297

Total for Proposed Standards 407 24.2 2.09 3.95 359 0.0590 255 173

Incremental Nationwide Emissions 630 27.1 1.62 2.86 260

- 0.0031 434 125

a Estimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.

## 20 Table 16. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for the Non

- Hg HAP Metals Beyond

- the

- Floor Option a



### Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Emissions

Type Number

of

APCD Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr Solid

waste

impacts,

tpy Waste

water

impacts,

gpy Secondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)

PM PM 2.5 

### CO NO

x 

### SO 2

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large Unit 553 17.9

-- 0.00408 0.00137 0.00688 0.0547 0.159

Total 3 1,659 53.8 0.0122 0.00410 0.0206 0.164 0.478

DIFF or

DLS/FF Retrofit with

a DIFF Large Unit 0 12.9

-- 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 0 25.7 0 0 0 0 0

DLA Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8

-- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62

Total 6 75,378 107 0.556 0.186 0.938 7.45 21.7

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 13,116 35.7

-- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78

Total 5 65,580 179 0.484 0.162 0.816 6.48 18.9

SD/ESP Retrofit with

a DIFF Large Unit

- 24,555 12.9

- 4,063

- 0.181

- 0.0607

- 0.305

- 2.43

- 7.07

Total 1

- 24,555 12.9

- 4,063

- 0.181

- 0.0607

- 0.305

- 2.43

- 7.07

None Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8

-- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62

Total 4 50,252 71.2 0.371 0.124 0.625 4.97 14.5

None Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 13,116 35.7

-- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78

Total 10 131,159 357 0.97 0.324 1.63 13.0 37.8

None Install DLA Large Unit 7,424 457

-- 0.0548 0.0184 0.0923 0.734 2.14

Total 11 81,659 5,031 0.602 0.202 1.02 8.07 23.5

None Install FF Small Unit 9,620 7.78

-- 0.071 0.0238 0.120 0.951 2.77

Total 12 115,439 93.3 0.852 0.286 1.44 11.4 33.3

None Install DLA Small Unit 3,741 306

-- 0.0276 0.00925 0.0465 0.370 1.08

Total 44 164,607 13,453 1.21 0.407 2.05 16.3 47.4

Total Nationwide 98 661,179 19,384

- 4,063 4.88 1.64 8.22 65.4 190

Total for Proposed Standards 316,842 6,335

- 4,063 2.34 0.784 3.94 31.3 91.3

Incremental Nationwide Impacts 344,336 13,048 0 2.54 0.852 4.28 34.0 99.2

a A negative increase in secondary impacts would be equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

## 21 B. Hg Beyond

- the

- Floor Option

Step 1: Compare Test Data to Emission Limits

Table 17 shows the percentages for the beyond

- the

- floor Hg lb/ton and concentration

emission limits by kiln size.

Table 17. Percentages of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to Hg Beyond

- the

- Floor Limit

Kiln Size Number of Kiln

Stacks with Data Percentage of Kilns Meeting

lb/ton Limit Concentration

Limit At Least One

Li mit

Large Kilns 18 16.7% 22.2 % 27.8 %

Small Kilns 1 100% 100% 100%



## Step 2 : Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

For the Hg beyond

- the

- floor option, the percentages from Table 17 were applied to the

kilns in Table 4 for Hg emissions, and the percentages from Table 5 were applied to the kilns in

Table 4 for non

- Hg HAP metals/PM emissions. From these estimates, preliminary estimates of

the number of APCD needed to be installed were developed using same criteria as described in

Section V of this memorandum.

Table 18 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of APCD needed for the Hg

beyond

- the

- floor option based only on these criteria and the percentages in Tables 4 and 17,

rounded to the nearest whole number. If multiple kilns were v ented together, only one APCD

was assigned to the stack.

Table 18. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and P reliminary Estimate of APCD

to B e Installed for the Hg Beyond

- the

- Floor Option

Kiln Size Existing APCD

Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number

of Ki ln

Stacks

Meeting

PM Limit Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

Hg Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install FF Install FF

with ACI Add ACI

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 7 a 2 0 0 6

DLA 14 12 2 0 12 0

None 31 10 9 0 22 0

Small Kilns SD/ESP b 1 0 1 0 0 0

None 78 49 78 29 0 0

Total 132 79 108 29 32 6

a Because the one kiln stack not meeting the PM lb/ton or concentration limits is already controlled with a PM APCD,

none of the preliminary assumptions apply. If this kiln stack cannot meet the lb/hr non

- Hg HAP metals limit, or if it is

not located at a facility that could become a synthetic area source by installing a DLA on an uncontrolled kiln, the

DIFF or DLS/FF would have to be retrofit with a new DIFF.

b The SD/ESP is expected to be replaced wit h a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum ).

## 22 Step 3 : Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

considering the impact of the proposed total non

- Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit and the beyond

- the

floor Hg lb/hr limit

, as well as the number of kilns located at facilities that could elect to become

synthetic area sources. As noted previously in this memorandum, because test data are not

available for every tunnel kiln in th e industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each kiln

and facility. Therefore, the preliminary APCD estimates in Table 18 , the lb/hr limit s

, and the

ability of certain facilities to become synthetic area were considered together on a more general

basis

. The following assumptions were used to refine the preliminary APCD estimates:

• For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it was assumed that the kiln stack not meeting

either the proposed PM lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the proposed total

non

- Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit.

• For large kilns with a DLA, it was expected that the kiln stacks not meeting the

beyond

- the

- floor Hg lb/ton or concentration limits would also not meet the beyond

the

- floor Hg lb/hr limit , due to the stringency of the beyond

- the

- floor Hg limits

.

• Based on the results of the analysis described in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 12 large uncontrolled kiln stacks are located at facilities that could become

synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stack s. Because the

beyond

- the

- floor Hg limits are more stringent than the proposed Hg limits, more

facilities would be expected to install one or more DLA to become a synthetic area

source. Therefore, for large uncontrolled kilns, it was assumed that owners or

operators of 11 of those kiln stacks, or two more than under the proposed standards,

would elect to install a DLA . It was expected that 9 of these 11 are the same kiln

stacks located at facilities that would install a DLA as in Section V of this

memo ra ndum that the other two kiln stack s would not meet the proposed Hg limit.

• Because all small uncontrolled kilns are projected to meet the beyond

- the

- floor Hg

limit, and the PM and non

- Hg HAP metals limits are the same as the proposed

standards, the same refinements described in Section V of this memorandum were

applied to small uncontrolled kilns for the Hg beyond

- the

- floor option.

The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 1 9

.

Table 19. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Estimate of APCD to B e

Installed for the Hg Beyond

- the

- Floor Option

Kiln Size Existing APCD

Type Number of

Kiln Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a No

Change

in APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 0 0 6 0 0 2

DLA 14 0 12 0 0 0 2

None 31 0 17 0 0 11 3

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 78 3 0 0 0 5 70

Total 132 3 29 6 1 16 77

a See Section IV of this memorandum.

## 23 Step 4 : Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide costs and impacts for the non

- Hg HAP metals

beyond

- the

- floor option was to apply model APCD costs, emission reducti ons, and secondary

impacts to the APCD counts shown in Table 19. The model APCD size is based on the design

capacity(ies) of the kiln(s) routed to that emission point/APCD. For example, two small kilns

vented together with a total design capacity of less than 10 tph would be controlled with a small

APCD, whereas two small kilns vented together that have a total design capacity of more than

10 tph would be controlled with a large APCD.

As noted in Section IV of this memorandum , for purposes of this analysi s, the DIFF

installed to replace the SD/ESP at Belden Brick Company’s facility in Sugarcreek, Ohio would

be a large DIFF. It was also expected that one of the FF shown in Table 19 for small kilns would

be controlling multiple kilns and would therefore be a large FF. The remaining APCD shown in

Table 19 would be sized for one kiln.

For the Hg beyond

- the

- floor option, Table 20 shows the summary of nationwide costs,

Table 21 shows the summary of nationwide emission reductions, and Table 22 shows the

summary of nationwide secondary impacts. Based on the incremental annual cost in Table 20

and the incremental non

- Hg HAP metals emission reductions in Table 21, the cost effectiveness

of the Hg beyond

- the

- floor option is $ 148 million per additional ton of Hg redu ced.

Table 20. Summary of Nationwide Costs for the Hg Beyond

- the

- Floor Option

Current

APCD Action APCD Size Unit

Capital

Cost a Unit

Annual

Cost a Number

of APCD Total Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $112,768 6 $880,180 $676,609

DLA Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 0 $0 $0

DLA Install FF with

ACI Large $1,646,697 $638,774 12 $19,760,360 $7,665,293

SD/ESP Retrofit with a

DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,585 1 $3,820,000 $943,585

None Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 1 $1,500,000 $526,006

None Install FF with

ACI Large $1,646,697 $638,774 17 $27,993,843 $10,859,166

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $409,722 11 $16,385,023 $4,506,944

None Install FF Small $1,200,000 $437,845 2 $2,400,000 $875,690

None Install DLA Small $1,096,473 $310,036 5 $5,482,363 $1,550,180

Total Nationwide 55 $78,221,768 $27,603,473

Total for Proposed Standards $54,895,527 $18,358,221

Incremental Nationwide Cost $23,326,241 $9,245,253

a Unit costs from Holloway (2014a), except for the DLA capital and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table were increased to account for the fact that if a DLA is installed for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it would need to be installed earlier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for all APCD for purposes of this analysis, a DLA was

expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other AP CD, increasing the capital cost by about 3 percent

(calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 ) . The total annual cost increased due to the

increase in the annualized capital cost.

## 24 Table 21. Summary of Nationwide Emission Reductions for the Hg Beyond

- the

- Floor Option

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Emissions

Type Number

of

APCD Emissions Reductions (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### HAP

Metals PM Hg SO 2 

### PM 2.5 a

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.00347 0 0

Total 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.02084 0 0

DLA Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0 0 6.73

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0.00347 0 6.7 3

Total 12 0 0 0 1.85 168.2 0.0417 0 80.7

SD/ESP Retrofit

with a DIFF Large Unit 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0

Total 1 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0

None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55

Total 1 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55

None Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0.00347 0 8.55

Total 17 0 0 0 3.33 303 0.0590 0 145

None Install DLA Large Unit 33.0 1.42 0.0850 0.0417 3.79 0 22.7 1.82

Total 11 363 15.6 0.935 0.458 41.7 0 249 20.0

None Install FF Small Unit 0 0 0 0.0855 7.78 0 0 3.73

Total 2 0 0 0 0.171 15.6 0 0 7.46

None Install DLA Small Unit 14.4 0.620 0.0371 0.0182 1.65 0 9.90 0.79 4

Total 5 72.1 3.10 0.186 0.0910 8.27 0 49.5 3.97

Total Nationwide 55 473 27.1 2.26 6.10 554 0.122 300 266

Total for Proposed Standards 407 24.2 2.09 3.95 359 0.0590 255 173

Incremental Nationwide Emissions 66 .1 2.8 4 0.17 0 2.14 195 0.0625 45 .3 93.5

a Estimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.

## 25 Table 22. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for the Hg Beyond

- the

- Floor Option a



### Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Emissions

Type Number

of

APCD Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr Solid

waste

impacts,

tpy Waste

water

impacts,

gpy Secondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)

PM PM 2.5 

### CO NO

x 

### SO 2

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large Unit 553 27.3

-- 0.00408 0.00137 0.00688 0.0547 0.159

Total 6 3,318 163.8 0.0245 0.00821 0.0413 0.328 0.956

DLA Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8

-- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62

Total 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 13,116 45.1

-- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78

Total 12 157,391 541 1.16 0.389 1.96 15.6 45.3

SD/ESP Retrofit with

a DIFF Large Unit

- 24,555 12.9

- 4,063

- 0.181

- 0.0607

- 0.305

- 2.43

- 7.07

Total 1

- 24,555 12.9

- 4,063

- 0.181

- 0.0607

- 0.305

- 2.43

- 7.07

None Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8

-- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62

Total 1 12,563 17.8 0.093 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62

None Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 13,116 45.1

-- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78

Total 17 222,971 767 1.64 0.552 2.77 22.0 64.2

None Install DLA Large Unit 7,424 457

-- 0.0548 0.0184 0.0923 0.734 2.14

Total 11 81,659 5,031 0.602 0.202 1.02 8.07 23.5

None Install FF Small Unit 9,620 7.78

-- 0.071 0.0238 0.120 0.951 2.77

Total 2 19,240 15.6 0.142 0.0476 0.239 1.90 5.54

None Install DLA Small Unit 3,741 306

-- 0.0276 0.00925 0.0465 0.370 1.08

Total 5 18,705 1,529 0.138 0.0463 0.233 1.85 5.39

Total Nationwide 55 491,293 8,078

- 4,063 3.62 1.22 6.11 48.6 142

Total for Proposed Standards 316,842 6,335

- 4,063 2.34 0.784 3.94 31.3 91.3

Incremental Nationwide Impacts 174,450 1,743 0 1.29 0.432 2.17 17.2 50.3

a A negative increase in secondary impacts would be equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

## 26 V I I

. Cost and Emission Reduction Estimates for Meeting non

- Hg HAP Metals

Alternative Standards

The alternative standards for non

- Hg HAP metals (with PM as a surrogate) and their

development are discussed in the memorandum Maximum Achievable Control Technology

(MACT) Floor Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products (Raymond and Sroka, 2014).

The process to estimate costs and emission reduction impacts for the alternative standards was

the same as the process used for the proposed standards in Section V of this memorandum

. Specifically, because test data we re not available for all kilns in the industry, several assumptions

were needed to evaluate the impacts on the whole industry.

Step 1: Compare Test Data to Emission Limits

The first step was to compare the data available with the alternative emission limits to get

an estimate of the percentage of tunnel kilns in the industry that could meet the alternative limits

with current APCD configurations. Table 23 shows the percentages for the PM lb/ton and

concentration alternative emission limits b y kiln size and the most common types of APCD (for

PM).

Table 23. Percentages of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to Alternative Emission Limits

Pollutant Kiln Size APCD Type Number of

Kiln Stacks

wi th Data a 

### Percentage of Kilns Meeting b



### lb/ton

Limit Concentration

Limit At Least

One Limit

PM Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 28 28.6 % 82.1 % 82.1 %

DLA 30 3.33 % 43.3 % 43.3 %

None 3 33.3 % 33.3 % 33.3%

Small Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 1 100 % 100% 100%

DLA 0 ND ND ND

None 16 18.8 % 18.8 % 25.0%

a PM data were also available for one stack controlled by a SD/ESP (small kilns) and three large kilns with wet

scrubbers. Those kilns are not shown in the counts for PM emissions data because the SD/ESP is expected to be

replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum ) and all three wet scrubbers are located at synthetic area

sources, so the results for those APCD are not needed for purposes of estimating impacts on major source

facilities. In addit ion, the analysis does not assume that wet scrubbers would be installed or retrofitted to meet the

proposed PM standards. These kilns are included in the counts for Hg data; because none of the APCD currently

in use in the BSCP industry target Hg reductio ns, the ability to meet the Hg standards is not expected to be affected

by type of current APCD.

b ND = no test data available for that pollutant, kiln size, and APCD combination.



## Of the large kilns with both PM and Hg data, five of the 18 kiln stacks mee t at least one

of the alternative PM and one of the proposed Hg limits (see Section V of this memorandum for

the Hg percentages)

.

Step 2 : Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The percentages from Table 23 were applied to the kilns in Table 4 (see Section V of this

memorandum ) to determine the number of kilns estimated to be able to meet the alternative

## 27 limits . From these estimates, preliminary estimates of the number of APCD needed to be

installed to meet the alternative limits were developed using the same criteria described in

Section V of this memorandum

. Table 24 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of

APCD needed based only on these criteria and the percentages in Table 23 , rounded to the

nea rest whole number. If multiple kilns were vented together, only one A PCD was assigned to

the stack.

Table 24. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Preliminary Estimate of APCD

to be Installed to Meet Alternative Limits

Kiln Size Existing APCD

Typ e Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number of

Kiln Stacks

Meeting

Alternative

PM Limit Number of

Kiln Stacks

Meeting

Proposed

Hg Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install FF Install FF

with ACI Add ACI

Large

Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 7 a 4 0 0 4

DLA 14 5 8 3 6 0

None 31 10 17 7 14 0

Small

Kilns SD/ESP b 1 0 1 0 0 0

None 78 20 78 5 8 0 0

Total 132 42 108 68 21 3

a Because the one kiln stack not meeting the alternative PM lb/ton or concentration limits is already controlled with a

PM APCD, none of the preliminary assumptions apply. If this kiln stack cannot meet the alternative lb/hr non

- Hg

HAP metals limit, or if it is not located at a facility that could become a synthetic area source by installing a DLA on

an uncontrolled kiln, the DIFF or DLS/FF wo uld have to be retrofit with a new DIFF.

b The SD/ESP is expected to be replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum ).



## Step 3 : Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

considering the impact of the proposed Hg lb/hr limit and the alternative total non

- Hg HAP

metal lb/hr limit, as well as the number of kilns located at facilities that could elect to become

synthetic area sources. As noted previously in this memorandum, because test data are not

available for every tunnel kiln in the industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each kiln

and facility. Therefore, the preliminary APCD estimates in Table 24 , the lb/hr limit s

, and the

ability of certai n facilities to become synthetic area were considered together on a more general

basis

. The following assumptions were used to refine the preliminary APCD estimates:

• For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it was assumed that the kiln stack not meeting

eit her the alternative PM lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the alternative

total non

- Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit. It was also assumed that one of the kiln stacks

not meeting the proposed Hg lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the proposed

Hg lb/ hr limit.

• For large kilns with a DLA, it was assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the

proposed Hg lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the proposed Hg lb/hr limit. It

was also assumed that this kiln stack is not one of the five stacks that can meet one of

the alternative PM limits.

## 28 • Based on the results of the analysis described in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 12 large uncontrolled kiln stacks are located at facilities that could become

synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stacks. Because the

alternative PM limits are more stringent than the proposed PM limits, more facilities

would be expected to install one or more DLA to become a synthetic area source.

Therefore, for large uncontrolled kilns, it was as sumed that owners or operators of 10

of those kiln stacks, or one more than under the proposed standards, would elect to

install a DLA

.

• As with large kilns, because the alternative PM limits are more stringent than the

proposed PM limits, more facilities w ould be expected to install one or more DLA to

become a synthetic area source. However, it was still expected that many small

uncontrolled kilns would be able to meet the alternative total non

- Hg HAP metals

lb/hr limit and would not need to install DLA to become a synthetic area source

. Therefore, for small uncontrolled kilns, i t was assumed that a little over 25 percent of

the total kiln stacks, or 21 total stacks, were located at facilities that would elect to

become synthetic area sources by installing a DLA. It was also assumed that 26 of

the 37 remaining kiln stacks not meeting the alternative PM lb/ton or concentration

limits (70 percent) would be able to meet the alternative total non

- Hg HAP metals

lb/hr limit.

The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 25

.

Table 25. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Estimate of APCD to B e

Installed to Meet Alternative Limits

Kiln Size Existing

APCD Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Ins tall

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add

ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a 

### No

Change

in APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 0 0 3 0 0 5

DLA 14 4 5 0 0 0 5

None 31 1 10 0 0 10 10

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 78 11 0 0 0 21 46

Total 132 16 15 3 1 31 66

a See Section IV of this memorandum.



## Step 4 : Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide costs and impacts for the alternative limits was to

apply model APCD costs, emission reductions, and secondary impacts to the APCD counts

shown in Table 25

. The model APCD size is based on the design capacity(ies ) of the kiln(s)

routed to that emission point/APCD. For example, two small kilns vented together with a total

design capacity of less than 10 tph would be controlled with a small APCD, whereas two small

kilns vented together that have a total design capa city of more than 10 tph would be controlled

with a large APCD.

## 29 As noted in Section IV of this memorandum , for purposes of this analysis, the DIFF

installed to replace the SD/ESP at Belden Brick Company’s facility in Sugarcreek, Ohio would

be a large DIFF. It was also expected that three of the 11 FF and one of the 21 DLA shown in

Table 25 for small kilns would be controlling multiple kilns and would therefore be large FF and

a large DLA. The remaining APCD shown in Table 25 would be sized for one kiln.

T able 26 shows the summary of nationwide costs for major sources to meet the

alternative limits , Table 27 shows the summary of nationwide emission reductions for major

sources to meet the alternative limits , and Table 28 shows the summary of nationwide seco ndary

impacts for major sources to meet the alternative limits

.

Table 26. Summary of Nationwide Costs for Major Sources to Meet Alternative Limits

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Unit

Capital

Cost a 

### Unit

Annual

Cost a 

### Number

of

APCD Total

Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $96,482 3 $440,090 $289,446

DLA Install FF Large $ 1,500,000 $ 52 6,006 4 $6,000,000 $2,104,024

DLA Install FF with ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,48 8 5 $8,233,483 $3,112,440

SD/ESP Retrofit with a DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,5 85 1 $3,820,000 $943,585

None Install FF Large $ 1,500,000 $ 52 6,006 4 $6,000,000 $2,104,024

None Install FF with ACI Large $ 1,646,697 $622,48 8 10 $16,466,966 $6,224,880

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $409,722 11 $16,385,023 $4,506,944

None Install FF Small $1,200,000 $437,84 5 8 $9,600,000 $3,502,760

None Install DLA Small $1,096,473 $310,036 20 $21,929,451 $6,200,721

Total Nationwide 66 $88,875,013 $28,988,824

a Unit costs from Holloway (2014a), except for the DLA capital and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table we re increased to account for the fact that if a DLA is installed for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it wou ld need to be installed earlier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for all APCD for purposes of this analysis, a DLA was

expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other APCD, increasing the capital cost by about 3 percent

(calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 ) . The total annual cost increased due to the

increase in the annualized capital cost.

## 30 Table 27. Summary of Nationwide Emission Reducti ons for Major Sources to Meet Alternative Limits

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Emissions

Type Number

of

APCD Emissions Reductions (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### HAP

Metals PM Hg SO 2 

### PM 2.5 a

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.00311 0 0

Total 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.00932 0 0

DLA Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0 0 6.73

Total 4 0 0 0 0.617 56.1 0 0 26.9

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0.00311 0 6.73

Total 5 0 0 0 0.77 70.1 0.0155 0 33.6

SD/ESP Retrofit

with a DIFF Large Unit 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0

Total 1 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0

None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55

Total 4 0 0 0 0.783 71.2 0 0 34.2

None Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0.00311 0 8.55

Total 10 0 0 0 1.96 178 0.0311 0 85.5

None Install DLA Large Unit 33.0 1.42 0.0850 0.0417 3.79 0 22.7 1.82

Total 11 363 15.6 0.935 0.458 41.7 0 249 20.0

None Install FF Small Unit 0 0 0 0.0855 7.78 0 0 3.73

Total 8 0 0 0 0.684 62.2 0 0 29.9

None Install DLA Small Unit 14.4 0.620 0.0371 0.0182 1.65 0 9.90 0.794

Total 20 288 12.4 0.742 0.364 33.1 0 198 15.9

Total Nationwide 66 689 36.3 2.82 5.64 512 0.0559 449 246

a Estimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.

## 3 1 Table 28. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for Major Sources to Meet Alternative Limits a



### Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Emissions

Type Number

of

APCD Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr Solid

waste

impacts,

tpy Waste

water

impacts,

gpy Secondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)

PM PM 2.5 

### CO NO

x 

### SO 2

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large Unit 553 17.9

-- 0.00408 0.00137 0.00688 0.0547 0.159

Total 3 1,659 53.8 0.0122 0.00410 0.0206 0.164 0.478

DLA Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8

-- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62

Total 4 50,252 71.2 0.371 0.1243 0.625 4.97 14.5

DLA Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 13,116 35.7

-- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78

Total 5 65,580 179 0.484 0.162 0.816 6.48 18.9

SD/ESP Retrofit with

a DIFF Large Unit

- 24,555 12.9

- 4,063

- 0.181

- 0.0607

- 0.305

- 2.43

- 7.07

Total 1

- 24,555 12.9

- 4,063

- 0.181

- 0.0607

- 0.305

- 2.43

- 7.07

None Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8

-- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62

Total 4 50,252 71.2 0.371 0.1243 0.625 4.97 14.48

None Install FF

with ACI Large Unit 13,116 35.7

-- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78

Total 10 131,159 357 0.97 0.324 1.63 13.0 37.8

None Install DLA Large Unit 7,424 457

-- 0.0548 0.0184 0.0923 0.734 2.14

Total 11 81,659 5,031 0.602 0.202 1.016 8.07 23.5

None Install FF Small Unit 9,620 7.78

-- 0.071 0.0238 0.120 0.951 2.77

Total 8 76,959 62.2 0.568 0.1904 0.957 7.61 22.17

None Install DLA Small Unit 3,741 306

-- 0.0276 0.00925 0.0465 0.370 1.08

Total 20 74,822 6,115 0.552 0.1851 0.931 7.40 21.6

Total Nationwide 66 507,787 11,954

- 4,063 3.75 1.26 6.32 50.2 146

a A negative increase in secondary impacts would be equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

## 32 VII I

. References

Holloway, T. 2014 a

. Methodology and Assumptions Used to Estimate the Model Costs and

Impacts of BSCP Air Pollution Control Devices . Memorandum from Thomas Holloway, RTI

International, to Jeff Telander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. November 6 , 2014

.

Holloway, T. 2014b. Updated BSCP Inventory Database and Documentation . Me morandum

from Thomas Holloway, RTI International, to J eff Telander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD

. November

6 , 2014

.

Morris, M., T. Palma, and C. Sarsony. 2014. Risk Assessment to Determine a Health

- Based

Emission Limitation for Acid Gases for the Brick and Structural Clay Products

Manufacturing Source Category . Memorandum from Mark Morris, Ted Palma, and Chris

Sarsony, EPA/OAQPS/HEID, to Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0291 . May 19, 2014.

Raymond, G. 2014. Test Data Used in BSCP Proposed Rule . Memorandum from Gabrielle

Ray mond, RTI International, to Jeff Telander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. November 6 , 2014.

Raymond, G and K. Sroka. 2014. Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor

Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products . Memorandum from Gabrielle Raymond

and Kristi n Sroka, RTI International, to Jeff Telander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. November 6

, 2014.

## Appendix A

Analysis of the Cost to Facilities to Become Synthetic Area Sources

## A

- 1 Table A

- 1. Kiln List

Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

502 ACME

- 3 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Bennett Tunnel

Plant (BTP) Millsap TX 15.98 8352 DLS/FF LCD

507 ACME

- 8 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Elgin Plant

(ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 10.00 8400 None LCD

508 ACME

- 8 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Elgin Plant

(ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 19.10 8760 DIFF LCD

509 ACME

- 9 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 8760 None SCD

510 ACME

- 9 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 1416 None SCD

511 ACME

- 9 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 8760 None SCD

512 ACME

- 12 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Holly Springs Plant

(HSP) Holly

Springs MS 8.45 8760 None SCD

513 ACME

- 14 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Kanapolis Plant

(KAP) Kanopolis KS 5.78 8760 None SCD

500 ACME

- 1 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant

(AOP) Springfield MN 6.25 7665 None SCD

501 ACME

- 1 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant

(AOP) Springfield MN 6.25 7665 None SCD

515 ACME

- 18 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Perla Plant

(PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 9.66 8760 None SCD

516 ACME

- 18 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Perla Plant

(PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 7.86 8760 None SCD

518 ACME

- 20 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Texas Clay Plant

(TCP) Malakoff TX 10.20 8760 DLA LCD

519/520 ACME

- 20 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Texas Clay Plant

(TCP) Malakoff TX 10.20 8760 None LCD

521 ACME

- 21 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 8.51 8760 None SCD

## A

- 2 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

522 ACME

- 23 Acme Brick

Company Acme

- Wheeler Plant

(WTP) Jonesboro AR 7.01 8760 None SCD

523 2 American Eagle

Brick Co American Eagle Brick Co Sunland

Park NM 3.40 7000 None SCD

526 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick

Company Belden

- Plant #2

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 10.65 8760 DIFF LCD

527 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick

Company Belden

- Plant #3

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 13.70 8760 DIFF LCD

528/529/530 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick

Company Belden

- Plant #6

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 15.96 8760 None LCD

531/532/533 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick

Company Belden

- Plant #8

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 23.31 8760 SD/ESP LCD

534/535 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick

Company Belden

- Plant #9

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 6.10 8760 None SCD

536 BELD

- 2 Belden Brick

Company Belden

- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 3.08 0 None SCD

537/538 BORA

- 1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 29.94 6264 DIFF LCD

539 BORA

- 2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 8424 None LCD

540 BORA

- 2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 8064 None LCD

545 BORA

- 4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 8760 None LCD

546 BORA

- 4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 7608 None LCD

547/548 BORA

- 5 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #6 Bessemer AL 25.02 8016 DIFF LCD

549 BORA

- 6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 8760 None SCD

550 BORA

- 6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 8760 None SCD

551/552 BORA

- 7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 22.66 8760 DLA LCD

558 BORA

- 13 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Muskogee Plant Muskogee OK 23.43 8256 DIFF LCD

559 BORA

- 14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 8136 None LCD

560 BORA

- 14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 7080 None LCD

561 BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 5664 None LCD

562 BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 8760 None LCD

## A

- 3 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

563 BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Phenix City AL 13.50 6744 None LCD

566 BORA

- 17 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Salisbury Plant Salisbury NC 27.80 8760 DIFF LCD

567 BORA

- 18 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Terre Haute Plant Terre Haute IN 26.00 8760 DIFF LCD

699 181 Certainteed

Corporation Certainteed Corporation

Ludowici New

Lexington OH 7.78 8760 None SCD

575 19 Cherokee Brick

& Tile Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 6240 None SCD

576 19 Cherokee Brick

& Tile Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 6240 None SCD

577/578 19 Cherokee Brick

& Tile Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 29.48 6240 DLA LCD

581 34 Columbus Brick

Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 7.90 7920 None SCD

582 34 Columbus Brick

Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 7.90 7920 None SCD

583 34 Columbus Brick

Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 18.30 7920 DLA LCD

584 134 Commercial

Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD

585 134 Commercial

Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD

586 134 Commercial

Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD

587 64 Continental Brick

Co Continental Brick

Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 8.35 7920 None SCD

588 64 Continental Brick

Co Continental Brick

Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 8.35 7920 None SCD

590 83 Cunningham

Brick Company,

Inc Cunningham

- Cleveland

Co Grover NC 9.08 7920 None SCD

## A

- 4 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

591 84 Cunningham

Brick Company,

Inc Cunningham

- Thomasville Thomasville NC 11.55 7920 None LCD

594 153 Elgin

- Butler Brick

Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 7920 None SCD

595 153 Elgin

- Butler Brick

Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 7920 None SCD

596 23 Endicott Clay

Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 6720 None SCD

597 23 Endicott Clay

Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 6720 None SCD

598 23 Endicott Clay

Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 8.86 6720 None SCD

599 158 General Finance,

Inc General Finance

- Cloud

Ceramics Concordia KS 6.17 4944 DIFF SCD

605 GENE

- 5 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plant

40 Coosa GA 18.75 8760 DIFF LCD

606 GENE

- 5 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plant

40 Coosa GA 18.75 8760 DIFF LCD

612/613 GENE

- 8 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants

35 & 36 Blue Ridge

(Roanoke) VA 20.20 8760 DLA LCD

614 GENE

- 8 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants

35 & 36 Blue Ridge

(Roanoke) VA 22.00 8760 DLA LCD

615 GENE

- 9 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants

6 & 28 Atkins

(Marion) VA 3.68 8760 None SCD

616 GENE

- 9 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants

6 & 28 Atkins

(Marion) VA 3.68 8760 None SCD

617 GENE

- 9 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants

6 & 28 Atkins

(Marion) VA 15.02 8760 DLA LCD

618 GENE

- 15 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale

- Corbin

Plant 33 Woodbine KY 9.9 0 None SCD

## A

- 5 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

619 GENE

- 15 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale

- Corbin

Plant 33 Woodbine KY 14.4 0 None LCD

622/623 GENE

- 11 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale

- Moncure

Facility Moncure NC 27.40 8760 None LCD

624 GENE

- 11 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale

- Moncure

Facility Moncure NC 20.55 8760 DLA LCD

625 GENE

- 11 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale

- Moncure

Facility Moncure NC 20.55 8760 DLA LCD

626/627 GENE

- 12 General Shale

Brick, Inc General Shale Robinson

Brick Co.

- Plant 2 Denver CO 20.40 8760 DLA LCD

635 GLEN

- 1 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Bigler Bigler PA 16.20 6225 None LCD

636 GLEN

- 1 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Bigler Bigler PA 16.20 6225 None LCD

637 GLEN

- 2 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Caledonia Caledonia OH 8.89 6408 None SCD

638 GLEN

- 2 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Caledonia Caledonia OH 8.89 6408 None SCD

639 GLEN

- 3 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Capitol Manassas VA 16.7 0 None LCD

644 GLEN

- 8 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Marseilles Marseilles IL 15.54 6648 DLA LCD

645 GLEN

- 8 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Marseilles Marseilles IL 15.96 6648 DLA LCD

642 GLEN

- 5 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Redfield Redfield IA 10.94 6552 None LCD

648 GLEN

- 10 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

York York PA 11.24 7032 None LCD

649 GLEN

- 10 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

York York PA 19.76 7896 DLA LCD

650 HANS2 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Athens Athens TX 9.53 8760 None SCD

## A

- 6 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

671 HANS13 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant

2 Columbia SC 11.30 8352 None LCD

672 HANS13 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant

2 Columbia SC 11.30 8352 None LCD

673/674 HANS14 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant

4 Columbia SC 22.60 8280 DLA LCD

652 HANS5 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Elgin Elgin TX 11.50 8760 None LCD

653 HANS5 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Elgin Elgin TX 12.20 8760 DLS/FF LCD

656 HANS7 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Mineral Wells

East Mineral

Wells TX 7.99 8760 None SCD

663 HANS9 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Ninety

- Six SC 8.90 7200 None SCD

664 HANS9 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Ninety

- Six SC 8.90 4944 None SCD

665 HANS9 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Ninety

- Six SC 8.90 2136 None SCD

667 HANS11 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 6528 None LCD

668 HANS11 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 6528 None LCD

669 HANS12 Hanson Brick

East, LLC Hanson

- Stanton Stanton KY 8.00 8604 None SCD

677 145 Hebron Brick

Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 9.60 7600 None SCD

679 78 Henry Brick

Company, Inc Henry Brick Selma AL 13.10 8760 DLA LCD

680 78 Henry Brick

Company, Inc Henry Brick Selma AL 13.10 8760 DLA LCD

589 178NR International

Chimney Corp Continental Clay

Kittanning Kittanning PA 2.25 8760 None SCD

## A

- 7 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

704/705/706/

707 184 Ironrock Capital

(formerly

Metropolitan

Ceramics, Inc.) Ironrock Capital (formerly

Metropolitan Ceramics,

Inc.) Canton OH 13.32 7700 None LCD

684 35 Acme Brick

Company Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 7080 None SCD

685 35 Acme Brick

Company Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 7080 None SCD

689 175NR Kansas Brick

and Tile Co Kansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 6.00 8760 None SCD

690 104 Kasten Clay

Products Co Kasten Clay Products Jackson MO 3.74 2288 None SCD

703 139 L.P. McNear

Brick Co, Inc McNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 8.20 6800 None SCD

693 135 Lee Brick and

Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.24 7840 None LCD

694 135 Lee Brick and

Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 9.64 7840 None SCD

695 135 Lee Brick and

Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.67 7840 None LCD

696 135 Lee Brick and

Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 13.50 7840 DLA LCD

701 50 Marion

Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 3.13 8760 None SCD

702 42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 12.00 7920 None LCD

592 MOHA

- 4 Mohawk

Industries Dal

- Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 3.56 6024 None SCD

593 MOHA

- 4 Mohawk

Industries Dal

- Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 3.56 6024 None SCD

178 MOHA

- 6 Mohawk

Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport,

Kentucky Lewisport KY 1.75 6024 None SCD

## A

- 8 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

180 MOHA

- 6 Mohawk

Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport,

Kentucky Lewisport KY 1.98 6024 None SCD

179 MOHA

- 6 Mohawk

Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport,

Kentucky Lewisport KY 1.98 6024 None SCD

709 87 Mutual Materials

Co Mutual Materials

- Mica Mica WA 9.60 7920 None SCD

710 88 Mutual Materials

Co Mutual Materials

Newcastle Renton WA 7.52 7080 None SCD

711 68 Old Virginia Brick

Co Old Virginia

- Madison

Heights Madison

Heights VA 8.44 4800 None SCD

712 69 Old Virginia Brick

Co Old Virginia

- Salem Salem VA 6.77 4800 None SCD

713 69 Old Virginia Brick

Co Old Virginia

- Salem Salem VA 4.65 4800 None SCD

714 176NR Pacific Clay

Products Pacific Clay Products

Lake Elsinore Lake

Elsinore CA 2.57 8760 None SCD

715 176NR Pacific Clay

Products Pacific Clay Products

Lake Elsinore Lake

Elsinore CA 2.57 8760 None SCD

716 176NR Pacific Clay

Products Pacific Clay Products

Lake Elsinore Lake

Elsinore CA 5.14 8760 None SCD

727/728 137 Pine Hall Brick

Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.08 7880 None LCD

729/730 137 Pine Hall Brick

Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Madison NC 26.60 7880 DLA LCD

731/732 137 Pine Hall Brick

Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.20 7880 None LCD

735 159 Ragland Clay

Products, LLC Ragland Clay Products Ragland AL 3.36 6240 None SCD

742 45 Richards Brick

Co Richards Brick Edwardsvill

e IL 4.62 2016 None SCD

743 45 Richards Brick

Co Richards Brick Edwardsvill

e IL 4.62 2016 None SCD

## A

- 9 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

747 90 Sioux City Brick

and Tile Co Sioux City

- Adel Plant Adel IA 13.10 7920 DLA LCD

748 90 Sioux City Brick

and Tile Co Sioux City

- Adel Plant Adel IA 16.37 7920 DIFF LCD

749 140 Sioux City Brick

and Tile Co Sioux City

- Sergeant Bluff

Plant Sergeant

Bluff IA 11.45 7920 DLA LCD

753 46 Statesville Brick

Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 11.00 5000 None LCD

754 46 Statesville Brick

Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 9.35 5000 None SCD

758 116 Summit Pressed

Brick and Tile Co Summit

- Brick Plant and

Storage Yard Pueblo CO 6.75 7056 None SCD

759 186 Summitville

Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Minerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD

760 186 Summitville

Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Minerva OH 1.24 6240 None SCD

761 186 Summitville

Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Minerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD

762 186 Summitville

Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Minerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD

766/767 49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick

- Merry Oaks

Plant Moncure NC 23.70 8760 DLA LCD

768 49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick

- Merry Oaks

Plant Moncure NC 24.70 8760 DLA LCD

769 TriWade Triangle Brick Triangle Brick

- Wadesboro

Plant Wadesboro NC 20.00 8760 DLA LCD

770 TriWade Triangle Brick Triangle Brick

- Wadesboro

Plant Wadesboro NC 20.00 8760 DLA LCD

773 124 Watsontown

Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontow

n PA 7.98 8760 None SCD

774 124 Watsontown

Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontow

n PA 10.00 8760 DIFF LCD

## A

- 10 Kiln ID Facility ID Company

Name Facility Name City State Combined

Design

Capacity

(tph) Operating

Hours APCD APCD

Size

775 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 11.90 8760 None LCD

776 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 6.80 8760 None SCD

777 147 Yankee Hill Brick

and Tile Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 4.90 6240 None SCD

## A

- 11 Table A

- 2. Emissions Estimates, Control Codes

, and Test Data Codes by Kiln

Kiln ID Emission Factors from Test

Data (lb/ton) Average Emission Factors

(lb/ton) Kiln Emissions (tpy)

Control

Code Test

Data

Code HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

502 0.001966 0.00363 4 0.002432 0.13 8 0.254 0.170 0.562 1 2

507 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 26.2 3.54 0.151 29. 9 0 0

508 0.01797 0.1133 2.747E

- 05 1.50 9.48 0.002 30 1 1

. 0 1 2

509 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 10. 5 1.41 0.0604 11.9 0 0

510 1.148 0.08084 0.003458 20. 1 1.41 0.0604 21.5 0 1

511 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 10. 5 1.41 0.0604 11.9 0 0

512 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 22.1 2.99 0.128 25. 3 0 0

513 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 15.1 2.0 5 0.0875 17. 3 0 0

500 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 16. 4 2.21 0.094 7 18.7 0 0

501 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 16. 4 2.21 0.094 7 18. 7 0 0

515 0.05 800 0.5983 0.003458 25.3 2.45 0.146 27.9 0 1

516 0.1507 0.08073 0.003458 5.1 9 2.7 8 0.119 8.0 9 0 2

518 0.0139 3 0.1963 0.003458 0.622 8.77 0.109 9.50 1 2

519/520 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 26.7 3.61 0.154 30. 5 0 0

521 1.31 6 0.299 7 0.003458 49. 1 11. 2 0.129 60. 4 0 2

522 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 18. 4 2.48 0.106 2 1

. 0 0 0

523 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 8.91 1.20 0.051 5 10. 2 0 0

526 0.04221 0.029 40 0.006779 1.9 7 1.37 0.316 3.66 1 2

527 0.07735 0.0122 8 0.0004661 4.64 0.73 7 0.02 80 5.4 1 1 2

528/529/530 0.5808 0.02998 0.003458 40.63 2. 10 0.24 2 42.9 0 2

531/532/533 0.8786 0.2142 0.0272 1 89.75 21. 9 2.7 8 114 1 2

534/535 0.570 9 0.0350 9 0.003458 15. 3 0.937 0.092 4 16. 3 0 2

536 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 8.07 1.09 0.046 7 9.2 1 0 0

537/538 0.105 4 0.00707 0 0.003458 13.8 0.927 0.31 9 15. 1 1 2

539 0.2720 0.08084 0.003458 13.4 3.98 0.170 17. 6 0 1

540 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29. 5 3.98 0.170 33.6 0 0

## A

- 12 Kiln ID Emission Factors from Test

Data (lb/ton) Average Emission Factors

(lb/ton) Kiln Emissions (tpy)

Control

Code Test

Data

Code HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

545 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 31.4 4.2 5 0.18 2 35. 9 0 0

546 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 31.4 4.2 5 0.18 2 35. 9 0 0

547/548 0.00328 7 0.00147 4 0.000157 7 0.360 0.161 0.017 2 0.53 9 1 2

549 0.6395 0.08084 0.003458 27.5 3.47 0.148 31. 1 0 1

550 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 25. 7 3.47 0.148 29.3 0 0

551/552 0.141 2 0.07520 0.002629 14.0 7.46 0.26 1 21.7 1 2

558 0.0001778 0.0039 90 0.002432 0.0182 0.409 0.249 0.677 1 2

559 0.2154 0.0969 0.003458 9.4 4 4.25 0.151 13.8 0 2

560 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 26.2 3.54 0.151 29.9 0 0

561 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29. 4 3.9 7 0.1 70 33. 5 0 0

562 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29. 4 3.9 7 0.1 70 33. 5 0 0

563 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 35. 4 4.78 0.204 40. 4 0 0

566 0.004354 0.0041 70 0.0244 4 0.530 0.50 8 2.9 8 4.01 1 2

567 0.000171 4 0.01362 0.002432 0.0195 1.55 0.277 1.8 5 1 2

699 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20. 4 2.75 0.118 23. 3 0 0

575 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 14. 4 1.94 0.0830 16. 4 0 0

576 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 14. 4 1.94 0.0830 16. 4 0 0

577/578 0.1275 0.0790 5 0.002432 16. 5 10.2 0.315 2 7

. 0 1 2

581 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.7 2. 80 0.1 20 23.6 0 0

582 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.7 2. 80 0.1 20 23.6 0 0

583 0.0451 9 0.0449 4 0.002441 3.62 3.60 0.196 7.4 2 1 2

584 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 32.1 4.34 0.186 36. 7 0 0

585 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 32.1 4.34 0.186 36. 7 0 0

586 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 32.1 4.34 0.186 36. 7 0 0

587 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 21. 9 2.96 0.126 2 5

. 0 0 0

588 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 21. 9 2.96 0.126 2 5

. 0 0 0

590 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23. 8 3.2 2 0.13 8 27.1 0 0

## A

- 13 Kiln ID Emission Factors from Test

Data (lb/ton) Average Emission Factors

(lb/ton) Kiln Emissions (tpy)

Control

Code Test

Data

Code HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

591 0.4461 0.08084 0.003458 22.6 4.09 0.17 5 26.8 0 1

594 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 4.0 1 0.54 2 0.023 2 4.57 0 0

595 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 4.0 1 0.54 2 0.023 2 4.57 0 0

596 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23. 6 3.1 9 0.136 26.9 0 0

597 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23. 6 3.1 9 0.136 26.9 0 0

598 0.235 7 0.08084 0.003458 9.15 3.1 4 0.134 12.4 0 1

599 0.0460 6 0.00958 5 0.002432 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.5 7 1 2

605 0.0493 3 0.0822 4 0.002432 4.05 6.75 0. 200 11.0 1 2

606 0.145 4 0.0553 6 0.0001111 11.9 4.5 5 0.0091 3 16. 5 1 2

612/613 0.00506 8 0.05985 0.002441 0.448 5. 30 0.21 6 5.9 6 1 1

614 0.107 9 0.201 7 0.002441 10.4 19.4 0.235 30. 1 1 2

615 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.64 1.30 0.0557 11.0 0 0

616 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.64 1.30 0.0557 11.0 0 0

617 0.0370 9 0.05985 0.002441 2.4 4 3.9 4 0.16 1 6.5 4 1 0

618 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 25.9 3.5 1 0.1 50 29.6 0 0

619 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 37.7 5. 10 0.218 43. 1 0 0

622/623 0.0863 0.08084 0.003458 10. 4 9.70 0.415 20. 5 0 1

624 0.0370 9 0.05985 0.002441 3.3 4 5.3 9 0.2 20 8.95 1 0

625 0.00301 1 0.02776 0.002441 0.27 1 2. 50 0.2 20 2.99 1 2

626/627 0.0370 9 0.05985 0.002441 3.31 5.3 5 0.218 8.8 8 1 0

635 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 42. 5 5.7 4 0.245 48.4 0 0

636 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 42. 5 5.7 4 0.245 48.4 0 0

637 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23. 3 3.1 5 0.13 5 26. 6 0 0

638 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23. 3 3.1 5 0.13 5 26. 6 0 0

639 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 43. 8 5.91 0.25 3 49.9 0 0

644 0.00804 3 0.1204 0.002441 0.547 8. 20 0.166 8.91 1 2

645 0.01136 0.0859 0.002441 0.794 6.0 1 0.17 1 6.97 1 2

## A

- 14 Kiln ID Emission Factors from Test

Data (lb/ton) Average Emission Factors

(lb/ton) Kiln Emissions (tpy)

Control

Code Test

Data

Code HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

642 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 28.7 3.87 0.16 6 32.7 0 0

648 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29. 5 3.9 8 0.170 33.6 0 0

649 0.05011 0.02146 0.002441 4.3 4 1.8 6 0.211 6.4 1 1 2

650 0.530 4 0.157 7 0.003458 22.1 6.58 0.144 28. 9 0 2

671 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29.6 4.00 0.171 33.8 0 0

672 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29.6 4.00 0.171 33.8 0 0

673/674 0.038 30 0.01529 0.002441 3.79 1.51 0.24 2 5.5 5 1 2

652 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 30.1 4.07 0.174 34. 4 0 0

653 0.00158 1 0.004446 0.000151 5 0.084 5 0.23 8 0.00809 0.330 1 2

656 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.9 2.8 3 0.121 23. 9 0 0

663 0.5385 0.08084 0.003458 2 1

. 0 3.15 0.13 5 24. 3 0 1

664 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23.3 3.15 0.135 26.6 0 0

665 0.498 5 0.08084 0.003458 19.4 3.15 0.135 22.7 0 1

667 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 27.5 3.7 2 0.159 31. 4 0 0

668 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 27.5 3.7 2 0.159 31. 4 0 0

669 0.7923 0.08084 0.003458 27. 8 2.83 0.121 30.7 0 1

677 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 25. 2 3. 40 0.145 28.7 0 0

679 0.00238 1 0.03804 0.002441 0.13 7 2.18 0.140 2.4 6 1 2

680 0.003030 0.0295 6 0.002441 0.17 4 1. 70 0.140 2.0 1 1 2

589 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 5. 90 0.79 7 0.034 1 6.7 3 0 0

704/705/706/

707 0.4127 0.08084 0.003458 24. 1 4.7 2 0.20 2 2 9

. 0 0 1

684 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 24. 9 3.36 0.14 4 28.4 0 0

685 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 24. 9 3.36 0.14 4 28.4 0 0

689 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 15.7 2.12 0.090 9 17.9 0 0

690 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.8 1 1.3 3 0.056 7 11. 2 0 0

703 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 21. 5 2.90 0.124 24.5 0 0

693 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 32. 1 4.33 0.185 36. 6 0 0

## A

- 15 Kiln ID Emission Factors from Test

Data (lb/ton) Average Emission Factors

(lb/ton) Kiln Emissions (tpy)

Control

Code Test

Data

Code HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

694 0.504 1 0.08084 0.003458 21. 3 3.41 0.146 24.8 0 1

695 0.5748 0.01090 0.003458 31. 9 0.60 5 0.19 2 32. 7 0 2

696 0.00394 7 0.100 5 0.002441 0.233 5.94 0.144 6.3 2 1 2

701 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 8.2 1 1.1 1 0.0474 9.36 6 0 0

702 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 31.4 4.2 5 0.18 2 35. 9 0 0

592 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.3 3 1.26 0.0539 10.6 0 0

593 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.3 3 1.26 0.0539 10.6 0 0

178 0.7925 0.0232 9 0.003458 6.07 0.17 9 0.0265 6.2 8 0 2

180 0.4491 0.0232 6 0.003458 3.89 0.20 2 0.0 300 4.1 3 0 2

179 0.3862 0.02031 0.003458 3.3 5 0.176 0.0 300 3.5 6 0 2

709 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 25. 2 3. 40 0.145 28.7 0 0

710 1.068 0.08084 0.003458 35. 2 2.66 0.11 4 3 8

. 0 0 1

711 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 22.1 2.9 9 0.12 8 25.2 0 0

712 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 17.7 2. 40 0.10 3 20.2 0 0

713 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 12. 2 1.6 5 0.0704 13.9 0 0

714 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 6.7 4 0.9 1 0 0.0389 7.68 0 0

715 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 6.7 4 0.9 1 0 0.0389 7.68 0 0

716 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 13. 5 1.8 2 0.077 9 15. 4 0 0

727/728 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 50.0 6.7 6 0.289 57.0 0 0

729/730 0.0210 8 0.01165 0.002441 2.4 6 1.3 6 0.284 4. 10 1 2

731/732 0.403 8 0.0957 3 0.003458 3 4

. 0 8.05 0.29 1 42. 3 0 2

735 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 8.8 1 1.19 0.0509 10.0 0 0

742 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 12.1 1.6 4 0.0 700 13.8 0 0

743 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 12.1 1.6 4 0.0 700 13.8 0 0

747 0.0370 9 0.05985 0.002441 2.1 3 3.43 0.140 5.70 1 0

748 0.0388 8 0.0279 8 0.002432 2.7 9 2.0 1 0.174 4.97 1 0

749 0.0370 9 0.05985 0.002441 1.8 6 3.00 0.122 4.98 1 0

## A

- 16 Kiln ID Emission Factors from Test

Data (lb/ton) Average Emission Factors

(lb/ton) Kiln Emissions (tpy)

Control

Code Test

Data

Code HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

753 0.294 4 0.08084 0.003458 14. 2 3.89 0.16 7 18.2 0 1

754 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 24.5 3.31 0.14 2 2 8

. 0 0 0

758 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 17. 7 2.39 0.102 20. 2 0 0

759 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 2.9 1 0.393 0.0168 3.3 2 0 0

760 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 3.2 5 0.439 0.0188 3.7 1 0 0

761 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 2.9 1 0.393 0.0168 3.3 2 0 0

762 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 2.9 1 0.393 0.0168 3.3 2 0 0

766/767 0.008777 0.01987 0.002441 0.911 2.06 0.253 3.2 3 1 2

768 0.00462 7 0.0113 6 0.002441 0.50 1 1.2 3 0.264 1.99 1 2

769 0.00525 5 0.0258 5 0.002441 0.460 2.26 0.21 4 2.9 4 1 2

770 0.005066 0.022 80 0.002441 0.44 4 2.00 0.21 4 2.65 1 2

773 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.9 2.8 3 0.12 1 23. 9 0 0

774 0.0388 8 0.0279 8 0.002432 1.70 1.2 3 0.10 7 3.03 1 0

775 0.131 9 0.00959 0 0.000376 9 6.87 0. 500 0.0196 7.39 0 2

776 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 17.8 2.4 1 0.10 3 20.3 0 0

777 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 12.8 1.73 0.074 2 14.6 0 0

## A

- 17 Table A

- 3. Facility Status Based on Current Emissions Estimates

Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Facility Emissions (tpy)

Current

S tatus HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

ACME

- 3 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Bennett Tunnel Plant (BTP) Millsap TX 0.138 0.254 0.170 0.562 Synthetic

Area

ACME

- 8 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 27.7 13.0 0.154 40.9 Major

ACME

- 9 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 41.0 4.24 0.181 45.4 Major

ACME

- 12 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) Holly Springs MS 22.1 2.99 0.128 25.3 Major

ACME

- 14 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) Kanopolis KS 15.1 2.05 0.0875 17.3 Major

ACME

- 1 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) Springfield MN 32.8 4.43 0.189 37.4 Major

ACME

- 18 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 30.5 5.23 0.265 36.0 Major

ACME

- 20 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) Malakoff TX 27.4 12.4 0.264 40.0 Major

ACME

- 21 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 49.1 11.2 0.129 60.4 Major

ACME

- 23 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Wheeler Plant (WTP) Jonesboro AR 18.4 2.48 0.106 21.0 Major

2 American Eagle Brick Co American Eagle Brick Co Sunland Park NM 8.91 1.20 0.0515 10.2 Major

BELD

- 1 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant #2 Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 152 27.0 3.46 183 Major

BELD

- 2 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 8.07 1.09 0.0467 9.21 Major

BORA

- 1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1 Major

BORA

- 2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 42.9 7.97 0.341 51.2 Major

BORA

- 4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 62.9 8.50 0.364 71.8 Major

BORA

- 5 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #6 Bessemer AL 0.360 0.162 0.0173 0.539 Synthetic

Area

BORA

- 6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 53.1 6.94 0.297 60.4 Major

BORA

- 7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7 Major

BORA

- 13 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Muskogee Plant Muskogee OK 0.0182 0.409 0.250 0.677 Synthetic

Area

BORA

- 14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 Phenix City AL 35.6 7.79 0.303 43.7 Major

BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Phenix City AL 94.1 12.7 0.544 107 Major

BORA

- 17 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Salisbury Plant Salisbury NC 0.530 0.508 2.98 4.01 Synthetic

Area

## A

- 18 Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Facility Emissions (tpy)

Current

S tatus HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

BORA

- 18 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Terre Haute Plant Terre Haute IN 0.0195 1.55 0.277 1.85 Synthetic

Area

181 Certainteed Corporation Certainteed Corporation

- Ludowici New Lexington OH 20.4 2.75 0.118 23.3 Major

19 Cherokee Brick & Tile Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 45.2 14.1 0.481 59.8 Major

34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 45.0 9.20 0.435 54.7 Major

134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 96.4 13.0 0.557 110 Major

64 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick

- Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 43.8 5.91 0.253 49.9 Major

83 Cunningham Brick

Company, Inc Cunningham

- Cleveland Co Grover NC 23.8 3.22 0.138 27.1 Major

84 Cunningham Brick

Company, Inc Cunningham

- Thomasville Thomasville NC 22.6 4.09 0.175 26.8 Major

153 Elgin

- Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 8.02 1.08 0.0463 9.15 Major

23 Endicott Clay Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 56.3 9.51 0.407 66.2 Major

158 General Finance, Inc General Finance

- Cloud Ceramics Concordia KS 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57 Synthetic

Area

GENE

- 5 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plant 40 Coosa GA 16.0 11.3 0.209 27.5 Major

GENE

- 8 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants 35 & 36 Blue Ridge

(Roanoke) VA 10.8 24.7 0.451 36.0 Major

GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants 6 & 28 Atkins (Marion) VA 21.7 6.54 0.272 28.5 Major

GENE

- 15 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Corbin

- Plant 33 Woodbine KY 63.7 8.60 0.368 72.7 Major

GENE

- 11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Moncure Facility Moncure NC 14.0 17.6 0.854 32.4 Major

GENE

- 12 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Robinson Brick Co.

-

Plant 2 Denver CO 3.31 5.35 0.218 8.88 Synthetic

Area

GLEN

- 1 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Bigler Bigler PA 84.9 11.5 0.491 96.9 Major

GLEN

- 2 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Caledonia Caledonia OH 46.6 6.30 0.269 53.2 Major

GLEN

- 3 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Capitol Manassas VA 43.8 5.91 0.253 49.9 Major

GLEN

- 8 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Marseilles Marseilles IL 1.34 14.2 0.337 15.9 Major

GLEN

- 5 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Redfield Redfield IA 28.7 3.87 0.166 32.7 Major

GLEN

- 10 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- York York PA 33.8 5.84 0.382 40.0 Major

HANS2 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Athens Athens TX 22.1 6.58 0.144 28.9 Major

## A

- 19 Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Facility Emissions (tpy)

Current

S tatus HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

HANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant 2 Columbia SC 59.2 8.00 0.342 67.6 Major

HANS14 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant 4 Columbia SC 3.79 1.51 0.242 5.55 Synthetic

Area

HANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Elgin Elgin TX 30.2 4.31 0.182 34.7 Major

HANS7 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Mineral Wells East Mineral Wells TX 20.9 2.83 0.121 23.9 Major

HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Ninety

- Six SC 63.7 9.45 0.404 73.6 Major

HANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Roseboro Roseboro NC 55.0 7.44 0.318 62.8 Major

HANS12 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Stanton Stanton KY 27.8 2.83 0.121 30.7 Major

145 Hebron Brick Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 25.2 3.40 0.145 28.7 Major

78 Henry Brick Company, Inc Henry Brick Selma AL 0.310 3.88 0.280 4.47 Synthetic

Area

178NR International Chimney Corp Continental Clay

- Kittanning Kittanning PA 5.90 0.797 0.0341 6.73 Synthetic

Area

184 Ironrock Capital (formerly

Metropolitan Ceramics, Inc.) Ironrock Capital (formerly

Metropolitan Ceramics, Inc.) Canton OH 24.1 4.72 0.202 29.0 Major

35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 49.8 6.73 0.288 56.8 Major

175NR Kansas Brick and Tile Co Kansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 15.7 2.12 0.0909 17.9 Major

104 Kasten Clay Products Co Kasten Clay Products Jackson MO 9.81 1.33 0.0567 11.2 Major

139 L.P. McNear Brick Co, Inc McNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 21.5 2.90 0.124 24.5 Major

135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 85.5 14.3 0.668 100 Major

50 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 8.21 1.11 0.0474 9.37 Major

42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 31.4 4.25 0.182 35.9 Major

MOHA

- 4 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 18.7 2.52 0.108 21.3 Major

MOHA

- 6 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky Lewisport KY 13.3 0.556 0.0865 14.0 Major

87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials

- Mica Mica WA 25.2 3.40 0.145 28.7 Major

88 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials

- Newcastle Renton WA 35.2 2.66 0.114 38.0 Major

68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Madison Heights Madison

Heights VA 22.1 2.99 0.128 25.2 Major

69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Salem Salem VA 29.9 4.04 0.173 34.1 Major

176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products

- Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore CA 26.9 3.64 0.156 30.7 Major

## A

- 20 Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Facility Emissions (tpy)

Current

S tatus HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Madison NC 86.4 16.2 0.864 103 Major

159 Ragland Clay Products,

LLC Ragland Clay Products Ragland AL 8.81 1.19 0.0509 10.0 Major

45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 24.2 3.27 0.140 27.6 Major

90 Sioux City Brick and Tile Co Sioux City

- Adel Plant Adel IA 4.92 5.44 0.314 10.7 Synthetic

Area

140 Sioux City Brick and Tile Co Sioux City

- Sergeant Bluff Plant Sergeant Bluff IA 1.86 3.00 0.122 4.98 Synthetic

Area

46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 38.7 7.21 0.308 46.2 Major

116 Summit Pressed Brick and

Tile Co Summit

- Brick Plant and Storage

Yard Pueblo CO 17.7 2.39 0.102 20.2 Major

186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

- Minerva Plant Minerva OH 12.0 1.62 0.0692 13.7 Major

49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick

- Merry Oaks Plant Moncure NC 1.41 3.29 0.517 5.22 Synthetic

Area

TriWade Triangle Brick Triangle Brick

- Wadesboro Plant Wadesboro NC 0.904 4.26 0.428 5.59 Synthetic

Area

124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 22.6 4.05 0.227 26.9 Major

Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 24.7 2.91 0.123 27.7 Major

147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 12.8 1.73 0.0742 14.6 Major

## A

- 21 Table A

- 4. Potential Kiln Control and Estimated Emissions for Major Source Kilns

Kiln ID Current APCD Potential Action to be

Synthetic Area APCD Size Kiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total HAP

507 None Install DLA LCD 1.31 2.48 0.106 3.89

508 DIFF None LCD 1.50 9.48 0.00230 11.0

509 None Install DLA SCD 0.523 0.989 0.0423 1.55

510 None Install DLA SCD 1.00 0.989 0.0423 2.03

511 None Install DLA SCD 0.523 0.989 0.0423 1.55

512 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 2.09 0.0896 3.29

513 None Install DLA SCD 0.757 1.43 0.0613 2.25

500 None Install DLA SCD 0.819 1.55 0.0663 2.43

501 None Install DLA SCD 0.819 1.55 0.0663 2.43

515 None Install DLA SCD 1.27 1.72 0.102 3.09

516 None Install DLA SCD 0.259 1.95 0.0833 2.29

518 DLA None LCD 0.622 8.77 0.109 9.51

519/520 None Install DLA LCD 1.34 2.53 0.108 3.97

521 None Install DLA SCD 2.45 7.82 0.0902 10.4

522 None Install DLA SCD 0.919 1.74 0.0743 2.73

523 None Install DLA SCD 0.446 0.843 0.0360 1.32

526 DIFF None LCD 1.97 1.37 0.316 3.66

527 DIFF None LCD 4.64 0.737 0.0280 5.41

528/529/530 None Install DLA LCD 2.03 1.47 0.169 3.67

531/532/533 SD/ESP None LCD 89.7 21.9 2.78 114

534/535 None Install DLA SCD 0.763 0.656 0.0647 1.48

536 None Install DLA SCD 0.404 0.763 0.0327 1.20

537/538 DIFF None LCD 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1

539 None Install DLA LCD 0.670 2.79 0.119 3.58

540 None Install DLA LCD 1.47 2.79 0.119 4.38

545 None Install DLA LCD 1.57 2.97 0.127 4.67

546 None Install DLA LCD 1.57 2.97 0.127 4.67

549 None Install DLA SCD 1.37 2.43 0.104 3.91

## A

- 22 Kiln ID Current APCD Potential Action to be

Synthetic Area APCD Size Kiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total HAP

550 None Install DLA SCD 1.28 2.43 0.104 3.82

551/552 DLA None LCD 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7

559 None Install DLA LCD 0.472 2.97 0.106 3.55

560 None Install DLA LCD 1.31 2.48 0.106 3.89

561 None Install DLA LCD 1.47 2.78 0.119 4.36

562 None Install DLA LCD 1.47 2.78 0.119 4.36

563 None Install DLA LCD 1.77 3.35 0.143 5.26

699 None Install DLA SCD 1.02 1.93 0.0825 3.03

575 None Install DLA SCD 0.718 1.36 0.0581 2.13

576 None Install DLA SCD 0.718 1.36 0.0581 2.13

577/578 DLA None LCD 16.5 10.2 0.315 27.0

581 None Install DLA SCD 1.04 1.96 0.0838 3.08

582 None Install DLA SCD 1.04 1.96 0.0838 3.08

583 DLA None LCD 3.62 3.60 0.196 7.42

584 None Install DLA LCD 1.61 3.04 0.130 4.78

585 None Install DLA LCD 1.61 3.04 0.130 4.78

586 None Install DLA LCD 1.61 3.04 0.130 4.78

587 None Install DLA SCD 1.09 2.07 0.0885 3.25

588 None Install DLA SCD 1.09 2.07 0.0885 3.25

590 None Install DLA SCD 1.19 2.25 0.0963 3.54

591 None Install DLA LCD 1.13 2.86 0.122 4.11

594 None Install DLA SCD 0.200 0.379 0.0162 0.596

595 None None SCD 4.01 0.542 0.0232 4.57

596 None Install DLA SCD 1.18 2.23 0.0954 3.51

597 None Install DLA SCD 1.18 2.23 0.0954 3.51

598 None Install DLA SCD 0.457 2.20 0.0939 2.75

599 DIFF None SCD 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57

605 DIFF None LCD 4.05 6.75 0.200 11.0

606 DIFF None LCD 11.9 4.55 0.00913 16.5

## A

- 23 Kiln ID Current APCD Potential Action to be

Synthetic Area APCD Size Kiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total HAP

612/613 DLA None LCD 0.448 5.30 0.216 5.96

614 DLA None LCD 10.4 19.4 0.235 30.1

615 None Install DLA SCD 0.482 0.912 0.0390 1.43

616 None Install DLA SCD 0.482 0.912 0.0390 1.43

617 DLA None LCD 2.44 3.94 0.161 6.54

618 None Install DLA SCD 1.30 2.45 0.105 3.86

619 None Install DLA LCD 1.89 3.57 0.153 5.61

622/623 None Install DLA LCD 0.518 6.79 0.291 7.60

624 DLA None LCD 3.34 5.39 0.220 8.95

625 DLA None LCD 0.271 2.50 0.220 2.99

635 None Install DLA LCD 2.12 4.02 0.172 6.31

636 None Install DLA LCD 2.12 4.02 0.172 6.31

637 None Install DLA SCD 1.16 2.20 0.0943 3.46

638 None Install DLA SCD 1.16 2.20 0.0943 3.46

639 None Install DLA LCD 2.19 4.14 0.177 6.50

644 DLA None LCD 0.547 8.20 0.166 8.91

645 DLA None LCD 0.794 6.01 0.171 6.97

642 None Install DLA LCD 1.43 2.71 0.116 4.26

648 None Install DLA LCD 1.47 2.79 0.119 4.38

649 DLA None LCD 4.34 1.86 0.211 6.41

650 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 4.61 0.101 5.82

671 None Install DLA LCD 1.48 2.80 0.120 4.40

672 None Install DLA LCD 1.48 2.80 0.120 4.40

652 None Install DLA LCD 1.51 2.85 0.122 4.48

653 DLS/FF None LCD 0.0845 0.238 0.00809 0.330

656 None Install DLA SCD 1.05 1.98 0.0847 3.11

663 None Install DLA SCD 1.05 2.21 0.0944 3.35

664 None Install DLA SCD 1.17 2.21 0.0944 3.47

665 None Install DLA SCD 0.972 2.21 0.0944 3.27

## A

- 24 Kiln ID Current APCD Potential Action to be

Synthetic Area APCD Size Kiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total HAP

667 None Install DLA LCD 1.38 2.60 0.111 4.09

668 None Install DLA LCD 1.38 2.60 0.111 4.09

669 None Install DLA SCD 1.39 1.98 0.0848 3.46

677 None Install DLA SCD 1.26 2.38 0.102 3.74

589 None None SCD 5.90 0.797 0.0341 6.73

704/705/706/707 None Install DLA LCD 1.20 3.30 0.141 4.65

684 None Install DLA SCD 1.24 2.35 0.101 3.70

685 None Install DLA SCD 1.24 2.35 0.101 3.70

689 None Install DLA SCD 0.786 1.49 0.0636 2.34

690 None Install DLA SCD 0.490 0.928 0.0397 1.46

703 None Install DLA SCD 1.07 2.03 0.0869 3.19

693 None Install DLA LCD 1.60 3.03 0.130 4.77

694 None Install DLA SCD 1.06 2.39 0.102 3.56

695 None Install DLA LCD 1.59 0.423 0.134 2.15

696 DLA None LCD 0.233 5.94 0.144 6.32

701 None Install DLA SCD 0.410 0.776 0.0332 1.22

702 None Install DLA LCD 1.57 2.97 0.127 4.67

592 None Install DLA SCD 0.466 0.882 0.0377 1.39

593 None Install DLA SCD 0.466 0.882 0.0377 1.39

178 None Install DLA SCD 0.304 0.125 0.0186 0.447

180 None None SCD 3.89 0.202 0.0300 4.13

179 None None SCD 3.35 0.176 0.0300 3.56

709 None Install DLA SCD 1.26 2.38 0.102 3.74

710 None Install DLA SCD 1.76 1.86 0.0798 3.70

711 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 2.09 0.0895 3.29

712 None Install DLA SCD 0.887 1.68 0.0718 2.64

713 None Install DLA SCD 0.609 1.15 0.0493 1.81

714 None Install DLA SCD 0.337 0.637 0.0272 1.00

715 None Install DLA SCD 0.337 0.637 0.0272 1.00

## A

- 25 Kiln ID Current APCD Potential Action to be

Synthetic Area APCD Size Kiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total HAP

716 None Install DLA SCD 0.674 1.27 0.0545 2.00

727/728 None Install DLA LCD 2.50 4.73 0.202 7.43

729/730 DLA None LCD 2.46 1.36 0.284 4.10

731/732 None Install DLA LCD 1.70 5.64 0.204 7.54

735 None Install DLA SCD 0.440 0.833 0.0356 1.31

742 None Install DLA SCD 0.605 1.15 0.0490 1.80

743 None Install DLA SCD 0.605 1.15 0.0490 1.80

749 DLA None LCD 1.86 3.00 0.122 4.98

753 None Install DLA LCD 0.709 2.73 0.117 3.55

754 None Install DLA SCD 1.23 2.32 0.0991 3.64

758 None Install DLA SCD 0.884 1.67 0.0716 2.63

759 None None SCD 2.91 0.393 0.0168 3.32

760 None Install DLA SCD 0.162 0.307 0.0131 0.483

761 None Install DLA SCD 0.145 0.275 0.0118 0.432

762 None Install DLA SCD 0.145 0.275 0.0118 0.432

773 None Install DLA SCD 1.05 1.98 0.0847 3.11

774 DIFF None LCD 1.70 1.23 0.107 3.03

775 None Install DLA LCD 0.344 0.350 0.0138 0.707

776 None Install DLA SCD 0.891 1.69 0.0721 2.65

777 None Install DLA SCD 0.642 1.21 0.0519 1.91

## A

- 26 Table A

- 5. Potential Facility Status and Cost Based on Installation of DLA for Current Major Sources

Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name Current

Status Facility Emissions with

Potential Control (tpy) Status With

Potential

Control Capital

Cost Annual

Cost HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

ACME

- 8 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Elgin Plant

(ELP/ENP) Major 2.81 12.0 0.108 14.9 Major $0 $0

ACME

- 9 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Eureka Plant

(EBP) Major 2.05 2.97 0.127 5.14 Synthetic

Area $3,289,418 $930,108

ACME

- 12 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Holly Springs

Plant (HSP) Major 1.11 2.09 0.0896 3.29 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

ACME

- 14 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Kanapolis Plant

(KAP) Major 0.757 1.43 0.0613 2.25 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

ACME

- 1 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant

(AOP) Major 1.64 3.10 0.133 4.87 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

ACME

- 18 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Perla Plant

(PEP/PWP) Major 1.53 3.66 0.186 5.37 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

ACME

- 20 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Texas Clay Plant

(TCP) Major 1.96 11.3 0.217 13.5 Major $0 $0

ACME

- 21 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Major 2.45 7.82 0.0902 10.4 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

ACME

- 23 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Wheeler Plant

(WTP) Major 0.919 1.74 0.0743 2.73 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

2 American Eagle Brick

Co American Eagle Brick Co Major 0.446 0.843 0.0360 1.32 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

BELD

- 1 Belden Brick

Company Belden

- Plant #2

Sugarcreek Major 99.1 26.1 3.36 129 Major $0 $0

BELD

- 2 Belden Brick

Company Belden

- Plant 1 Strasburg Major 0.404 0.763 0.0327 1.20 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

BORA

- 1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Atlanta Plant Major 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1 Major $0 $0

BORA

- 2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 Major 2.14 5.58 0.239 7.96 Synthetic

Area $2,979,095 $819,444

BORA

- 4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 Major 3.14 5.95 0.254 9.35 Major $0 $0

BORA

- 6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Gleason Plant Major 2.66 4.86 0.208 7.72 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

## A

- 27 Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name Current

Status Facility Emissions with

Potential Control (tpy) Status With

Potential

Control Capital

Cost Annual

Cost HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

BORA

- 7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Henderson Facility Major 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7 Major $0 $0

BORA

- 14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 Major 1.78 5.45 0.212 7.44 Synthetic

Area $2,979,095 $819,444

BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Major 4.70 8.90 0.381 14.0 Major $0 $0

181 Certainteed

Corporation Certainteed Corporation

Ludowici Major 1.02 1.93 0.0825 3.03 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

19 Cherokee Brick & Tile

Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Major 17.9 12.9 0.431 31.3 Major $0 $0

34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick

Company Major 5.69 7.52 0.363 13.6 Major $0 $0

134 Commercial Brick

Corp Commercial Brick Corp Major 4.82 9.12 0.390 14.3 Major $0 $0

64 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick

Martinsburg Major 2.19 4.14 0.177 6.50 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

83 Cunningham Brick

Company, Inc Cunningham

- Cleveland

Co Major 1.19 2.25 0.0963 3.54 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

84 Cunningham Brick

Company, Inc Cunningham

Thomasville Major 1.13 2.86 0.122 4.11 Synthetic

Area $1,489,548 $409,722

153 Elgin

- Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Major 4.21 0.921 0.0394 5.17 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

23 Endicott Clay Products

Co Endicott Clay Products Major 2.82 6.66 0.285 9.76 Major $0 $0

GENE

- 5 General Shale Brick,

Inc General Shale Brick

- Plant

40 Major 16.0 11.3 0.209 27.5 Major $0 $0

GENE

- 8 General Shale Brick,

Inc General Shale Brick

Plants 35 & 36 Major 10.8 24.7 0.451 36.0 Major $0 $0

GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick,

Inc General Shale Brick

Plants 6 & 28 Major 3.40 5.76 0.239 9.40 Major $0 $0

GENE

- 15 General Shale Brick,

Inc General Shale

- Corbin

Plant 33 Major 3.18 6.02 0.258 9.46 Major $0 $0

## A

- 28 Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name Current

Status Facility Emissions with

Potential Control (tpy) Status With

Potential

Control Capital

Cost Annual

Cost HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

GENE

- 11 General Shale Brick,

Inc General Shale

- Moncure

Facility Major 4.13 14.7 0.730 19.5 Major $0 $0

GLEN

- 1 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Bigler Major 4.25 8.03 0.344 12.6 Major $0 $0

GLEN

- 2 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Caledonia Major 2.33 4.41 0.189 6.93 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

GLEN

- 3 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Capitol Major 2.19 4.14 0.177 6.50 Synthetic

Area $1,489,548 $409,722

GLEN

- 8 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Marseilles Major 1.34 14.2 0.337 15.9 Major $0 $0

GLEN

- 5 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Redfield Major 1.43 2.71 0.116 4.26 Synthetic

Area $1,489,548 $409,722

GLEN

- 10 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

York Major 5.81 4.64 0.330 10.8 Synthetic

Area $1,489,548 $409,722

HANS2 Hanson Brick East,

LLC Hanson

- Athens Major 1.11 4.61 0.101 5.82 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

HANS13 Hanson Brick East,

LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant

2 Major 2.96 5.60 0.240 8.80 Major $0 $0

HANS5 Hanson Brick East,

LLC Hanson

- Elgin Major 1.59 3.09 0.130 4.81 Synthetic

Area $1,489,548 $409,722

HANS7 Hanson Brick East,

LLC Hanson

- Mineral Wells

East Major 1.05 1.98 0.0847 3.11 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

HANS9 Hanson Brick East,

LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Major 3.19 6.62 0.283 10.1 Major $0 $0

HANS11 Hanson Brick East,

LLC Hanson

- Roseboro Major 2.75 5.21 0.223 8.18 Major $0 $0

HANS12 Hanson Brick East,

LLC Hanson

- Stanton Major 1.39 1.98 0.0848 3.46 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

145 Hebron Brick

Company Hebron Brick Plant Major 1.26 2.38 0.102 3.74 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

## A

- 29 Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name Current

Status Facility Emissions with

Potential Control (tpy) Status With

Potential

Control Capital

Cost Annual

Cost HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

184 Ironrock Capital

(formerly Metropolitan

Ceramics, Inc.) Ironrock Capital (formerly

Metropolitan Ceramics,

Inc.) Major 1.20 3.30 0.141 4.65 Synthetic

Area $1,489,548 $409,722

35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant Major 2.49 4.71 0.201 7.40 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

175NR Kansas Brick and Tile

Co Kansas Brick and Tile Major 0.786 1.49 0.0636 2.34 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

104 Kasten Clay Products

Co Kasten Clay Products Major 0.490 0.928 0.0397 1.46 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

139 L.P. McNear Brick Co,

Inc McNear Brickyard Major 1.07 2.03 0.0869 3.19 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Major 4.50 11.8 0.511 16.8 Major $0 $0

50 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Major 0.410 0.776 0.0332 1.22 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Major 1.57 2.97 0.127 4.67 Synthetic

Area $1,489,548 $409,722

MOHA

- 4 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Fayette,

Alabama Major 0.933 1.76 0.0755 2.77 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

MOHA

- 6 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport,

Kentucky Major 7.55 0.503 0.0785 8.13 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials

- Mica Major 1.26 2.38 0.102 3.74 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

88 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials

Newcastle Major 1.76 1.86 0.0798 3.70 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Madison

Heights Major 1.11 2.09 0.0895 3.29 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Salem Major 1.50 2.83 0.121 4.45 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products

Lake Elsinore Major 1.35 2.55 0.109 4.00 Synthetic

Area $3,289,418 $930,108

137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Major 6.65 11.7 0.690 19.1 Major $0 $0

## A

- 30 Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name Current

Status Facility Emissions with

Potential Control (tpy) Status With

Potential

Control Capital

Cost Annual

Cost HF HCl Cl 2 

### Total

HAP

159 Ragland Clay

Products, LLC Ragland Clay Products Major 0.440 0.833 0.0356 1.31 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Major 1.21 2.29 0.0980 3.60 Synthetic

Area $2,192,945 $620,072

46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Major 1.93 5.04 0.216 7.19 Synthetic

Area $2,586,020 $719,758

116 Summit Pressed Brick

and Tile Co Summit

- Brick Plant and

Storage Yard Major 0.884 1.67 0.0716 2.63 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Major 3.36 1.25 0.0535 4.67 Synthetic

Area $3,289,418 $930,108

124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Major 2.75 3.20 0.191 6.14 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Major 1.23 2.04 0.0858 3.36 Synthetic

Area $2,586,020 $719,758

147 Yankee Hill Brick and

Tile Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Major 0.642 1.21 0.0519 1.91 Synthetic

Area $1,096,473 $310,036

## Appendix B

Cost and Emission Reduction Estimates for Meeting Health

- Based Standards

## B

- 1 Table B

- 1. Acid Gas Emissions and Calculated HCl

- Equivalent Emissions for Major Source Kilns a



### Kiln

ID Facility

ID Facility Name Kiln Design

Capacity

(t ph ) APCD HF

Emissions

(lb/hr) HCl

Emissions

(lb/hr) Cl 2 

### Emissions

(lb/hr) Total HCl

Equivalent

(lb/hr) b

507 ACME

- 8 Acme

- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) 10.00 None **5.96 0.808**  **0.0346** 13.9

508 ACME

- 8 Acme

- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) 19.10 DIFF 0.268 1.83 0.000401 2.27

509 ACME

- 9 Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.21 **0.323 0.0138**  8.18

510 ACME

- 9 Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.21 **0.323 0.0138**  8.18

511 ACME

- 9 Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.21 **0.323 0.0138**  8.18

512 ACME

- 12 Acme

- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) 8.45 None **5.03 0.683**  **0.0292** 11.8

513 ACME

- 14 Acme

- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) 5.78 None **3.44 0.467**  **0.0200** 8.05

500 ACME

- 1 Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) 6.25 None **3.72 0.505**  **0.0216** 8.71

501 ACME

- 1 Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) 6.25 None **3.72 0.505**  **0.0216** 8.71

515 ACME

- 18 Acme

- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) 9.66 None 0.983 0.310 **0.0334** 6.17

516 ACME

- 18 Acme

- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) 7.86 None 0.983 0.527 **0.0272** 5.56

518 ACME

- 20 Acme

- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 10.20 DLA 0.142 2.00 **0.0249** 5.53

519 ACME

- 20 Acme

- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 5.10 None **3.04 0.412**  **0.0176** 7.10

520 ACME

- 20 Acme

- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 5.10 None **3.04 0.412**  **0.0176** 7.10

521 ACME

- 21 Acme

- Tulsa Plant (TUP) 8.51 None 11.2 2.55 **0.0294** 22.5

522 ACME

- 23 Acme

- Wheeler Plant (WTP) 7.01 None **4.18 0.567**  **0.0242** 9.76

523 2 American Eagle Brick Co 3.40 None **2.03 0.275**  **0.0118** 4.74

526 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #2 Sugarcreek 10.65 DIFF 0.344 0.191 0.0551 8.03

527 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #3 Sugarcreek 13.70 DIFF 0.707 0.0960 0.00332 1.55

528 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 2.97 0.143 **0.0184** 6.83

529 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 2.97 0.143 **0.0184** 6.83

530 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 1.03 0.0632 **0.0184** 3.99

531 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 4.49 1.09 0.139 26.0

532 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 5.12 1.25 0.159 29.7

533 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 5.12 1.25 0.159 29.7

534 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #9 Sugarcreek 3.05 None 1.41 0.0867 **0.0105** 3.51

## B

- 2 Kiln

ID Facility

ID Facility Name Kiln Design

Capacity

(t ph ) APCD HF

Emissions

(lb/hr) HCl

Emissions

(lb/hr) Cl 2 

### Emissions

(lb/hr) Total HCl

Equivalent

(lb/hr) b

535 BELD

- 1 Belden

- Plant #9 Sugarcreek 3.05 None 1.41 0.0867 **0.0105** 3.51

536 BELD

- 2 Belden

- Plant 1 Strasburg 3.08 None **1.83 0.249**  **0.0107** 4.29

537 BORA

- 1 Boral

- Atlanta Plant 14.97 DIFF 0.548 0.0417 **0.0364** 5.68

538 BORA

- 1 Boral

- Atlanta Plant 14.97 DIFF 1.85 0.119 **0.0364** 7.62

539 BORA

- 2 Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 11.25 None 2.54 **0.909 0.0389**  9.73

540 BORA

- 2 Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 11.25 None 2.54 **0.909 0.0389**  9.73

545 BORA

- 4 Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 12.00 None **7.15 0.970**  **0.0415** 16.7

546 BORA

- 4 Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 12.00 None **7.15 0.970**  **0.0415** 16.7

549 BORA

- 6 Boral

- Gleason Plant 9.80 None 3.77 **0.792 0.0339**  10.7

550 BORA

- 6 Boral

- Gleason Plant 9.80 None 3.77 **0.792 0.0339**  10.7

551 BORA

- 7 Boral

- Henderson Facility 11.33 DLA 1.45 0.789 0.0275 6.53

552 BORA

- 7 Boral

- Henderson Facility 11.33 DLA 1.45 0.789 0.0275 6.53

559 BORA

- 14 Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 10.00 None 2.77 1.25 **0.0346** 9.81

560 BORA

- 14 Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 10.00 None 2.77 1.25 **0.0346** 9.81

561 BORA

- 15 Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 13.50 None **8.04 1.09**  **0.0467** 18.8

562 BORA

- 15 Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 11.20 None **6.67 0.905**  **0.0387** 15.6

563 BORA

- 15 Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 11.20 None **6.67 0.905**  **0.0387** 15.6

699 181 Certainteed Corporation

- Ludowici 7.78 None **4.63 0.629**  **0.0269** 10.8

575 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 5.48 None **3.26 0.443**  **0.0190** 7.63

576 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 5.48 None **3.26 0.443**  **0.0190** 7.63

577 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 14.74 DLA 1.98 1.27 **0.0360** 8.89

578 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 14.74 DLA 2.07 1.24 **0.0360** 8.99

581 34 Columbus Brick Company 7.90 None **4.71 0.639**  **0.0273** 11.0

582 34 Columbus Brick Company 7.90 None **4.71 0.639**  **0.0273** 11.0

583 34 Columbus Brick Company 18.30 DLA 0.610 0.607 **0.0447** 7.43

584 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None **7.30 0.991**  **0.0424** 17.1

585 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None **7.30 0.991**  **0.0424** 17.1

586 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None **7.30 0.991**  **0.0424** 17.1

587 64 Continental Brick

- Martinsburg 8.35 None **4.97 0.675**  **0.0289** 11.6

## B

- 3 Kiln

ID Facility

ID Facility Name Kiln Design

Capacity

(t ph ) APCD HF

Emissions

(lb/hr) HCl

Emissions

(lb/hr) Cl 2 

### Emissions

(lb/hr) Total HCl

Equivalent

(lb/hr) b

588 64 Continental Brick

- Martinsburg 8.35 None **4.97 0.675**  **0.0289** 11.6

590 83 Cunningham

- Cleveland Co 9.08 None **5.41 0.734**  **0.0314** 12.6

591 84 Cunningham

- Thomasville 11.55 None 4.28 **0.934 0.0399**  12.4

592 MOHA

- 4 Dal

- Tile, Fayette, Alabama 3.56 None **2.12 0.288**  **0.0123** 4.96

593 MOHA

- 4 Dal

- Tile, Fayette, Alabama 3.56 None **2.12 0.288**  **0.0123** 4.96

178 MOHA

- 6 Dal

- Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.75 None 1.66 0.0487 **0.00605** 3.22

179 MOHA

- 6 Dal

- Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.98 None 0.699 0.0368 **0.00685** 1.95

180 MOHA

- 6 Dal

- Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.98 None 0.844 0.0437 **0.00685** 2.16

594 153 Elgin Butler Plant 1.53 None **0.911 0.124**  **0.00529** 2.13

595 153 Elgin Butler Plant 1.53 None **0.911 0.124**  **0.00529** 2.13

596 23 Endicott Clay Products 9.00 None **5.36 0.728**  **0.0311** 12.5

597 23 Endicott Clay Products 9.00 None **5.36 0.728**  **0.0311** 12.5

598 23 Endicott Clay Products 8.86 None 1.40 **0.716 0.0306**  6.79

605 GENE

- 5 General Shale Brick

- Plant 40 18.75 DIFF 0.810 1.40 0.00187 2.80

606 GENE

- 5 General Shale Brick

- Plant 40 18.75 DIFF 2.69 0.916 0.00187 5.00

612 GENE

- 8 General Shale Brick

- Plants 35 & 36 10.10 DLA 0.0375 **0.605 0.0247**  3.95

613 GENE

- 8 General Shale Brick

- Plants 35 & 36 10.10 DLA 0.0375 **0.605 0.0247**  3.95

614 GENE

- 8 General Shale Brick

- Plants 35 & 36 22.00 DLA 1.85 3.42 **0.0537** 13.2

615 GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick

- Plants 6 & 28 3.68 None **2.19 0.297**  **0.0127** 5.13

616 GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick

- Plants 6 & 28 3.68 None **2.19 0.297**  **0.0127** 5.13

617 GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick

- Plants 6 & 28 15.02 DLA **0.557 0.899**  **0.0367** 6.58

618 GENE

- 15 General Shale

- Corbin

- Plant 33 9.90 None **5.90 0.800**  **0.0342** 13.8

619 GENE

- 15 General Shale

- Corbin

- Plant 33 14.40 None **8.58 1.16**  **0.0498** 20.1

622 GENE

- 11 General Shale

- Moncure Facility 13.70 None 0.982 **1.11 0.0474**  8.83

623 GENE

- 11 General Shale

- Moncure Facility 13.70 None 0.982 **1.11 0.0474**  8.83

624 GENE

- 11 General Shale

- Moncure Facility 20.55 DLA 0.0600 0.553 **0.0502** 7.33

625 GENE

- 11 General Shale

- Moncure Facility 20.55 DLA 0.0600 0.553 **0.0502** 7.33

635 GLEN

- 1 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Bigler 16.20 None **9.65 1.31**  **0.0560** 22.6

636 GLEN

- 1 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Bigler 16.20 None **9.65 1.31**  **0.0560** 22.6

## B

- 4 Kiln

ID Facility

ID Facility Name Kiln Design

Capacity

(t ph ) APCD HF

Emissions

(lb/hr) HCl

Emissions

(lb/hr) Cl 2 

### Emissions

(lb/hr) Total HCl

Equivalent

(lb/hr) b

637 GLEN

- 2 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Caledonia 8.89 None **5.30 0.719**  **0.0307** 12.4

638 GLEN

- 2 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Caledonia 8.89 None **5.30 0.719**  **0.0307** 12.4

639 GLEN

- 3 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Capitol 16.70 None **9.95 1.35**  **0.0577** 23.3

644 GLEN

- 8 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Marseilles 15.54 DLA 0.120 1.80 **0.0379** 7.03

645 GLEN

- 8 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Marseilles 15.96 DLA 0.181 1.36 **0.0390** 6.81

642 GLEN

- 5 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Redfield 10.94 None **6.52 0.884**  **0.0378** 15.2

648 GLEN

- 10 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- York 11.24 None **6.69 0.909**  **0.0389** 15.7

649 GLEN

- 10 Glen

- Gery Corporation

- York 19.76 DLA 0.599 0.257 **0.0482** 7.54

650 HANS2 Hanson

- Athens 9.53 None 5.25 1.56 **0.0330** 13.5

671 HANS13 Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant 2 11.30 None **6.73 0.914**  **0.0391** 15.7

672 HANS13 Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant 2 11.30 None **6.73 0.914**  **0.0391** 15.7

652 HANS5 Hanson

- Elgin 11.50 None 0.0176 0.0429 **0.0398** 5.37

653 HANS5 Hanson

- Elgin 12.20 DLS/FF 0.00550 0.0260 **0.0297** 3.99

656 HANS7 Hanson

- Mineral Wells East 7.99 None **4.76 0.646**  **0.0276** 11.1

663 HANS9 Hanson

- Ninety Six 8.90 None 4.15 **0.719 0.0308**  10.7

664 HANS9 Hanson

- Ninety Six 8.90 None 4.39 **0.719 0.0308**  11.1

665 HANS9 Hanson

- Ninety Six 8.90 None 4.39 **0.719 0.0308**  11.1

667 HANS11 Hanson

- Roseboro 10.50 None **6.25 0.849**  **0.0363** 14.6

668 HANS11 Hanson

- Roseboro 10.50 None **6.25 0.849**  **0.0363** 14.6

669 HANS12 Hanson

- Stanton 8.00 None 5.99 **0.647 0.0277**  12.9

677 145 Hebron Brick Plant 9.60 None 0.0300 **0.776 0.0332**  5.25

704 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly Metropolitan

Ceramics, Inc.) 3.33 None 0.861 **0.269 0.0115**  3.03

705 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly Metropolitan

Ceramics, Inc.) 3.33 None 0.861 **0.269 0.0115**  3.03

706 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly Metropolitan

Ceramics, Inc.) 3.33 None 1.43 **0.269 0.0115**  3.84

707 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly Metropolitan

Ceramics, Inc.) 3.33 None 1.05 **0.269 0.0115**  3.30

684 35 Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant 9.50 None **11.3 1.54**  **0.0657** 26.5

## B

- 5 Kiln

ID Facility

ID Facility Name Kiln Design

Capacity

(t ph ) APCD HF

Emissions

(lb/hr) HCl

Emissions

(lb/hr) Cl 2 

### Emissions

(lb/hr) Total HCl

Equivalent

(lb/hr) b

685 35 Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant 9.50 None **11.3 1.54**  **0.0657** 26.5

689 175NR Kansas Brick and Tile 6.00 None **3.57 0.485**  **0.0207** 8.36

690 104 Kasten Clay Products 3.74 None **2.23 0.303**  **0.0129** 5.21

693 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 12.24 None **7.29 0.989**  **0.0423** 17.0

694 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 9.64 None 3.93 **0.779 0.0333**  10.8

695 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 12.67 None 5.80 0.110 **0.0438** 14.2

696 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 13.50 DLA 0.0433 1.10 **0.0330** 5.56

701 50 Marion Ceramics 3.13 None **1.87 0.253**  **0.0108** 4.36

702 42 McAvoy Brick 12.00 None **7.15 0.970**  **0.0415** 16.7

703 139 McNear Brickyard 8.20 None **4.88 0.663**  **0.0284** 11.4

709 87 Mutual Materials

- Mica 9.60 None **5.72 0.776**  **0.0332** 13.4

710 88 Mutual Materials

- Newcastle 7.52 None 6.67 **0.608 0.0260**  13.6

711 68 Old Virginia

- Madison Heights 8.44 None **5.03 0.682**  **0.0292** 11.8

712 69 Old Virginia

- Salem 6.77 None **4.03 0.547**  **0.0234** 9.43

713 69 Old Virginia

- Salem 4.65 None **2.77 0.376**  **0.0161** 6.48

714 176NR Pacific Clay Products

- Lake Elsinore 2.57 None **1.53 0.208**  **0.00889** 3.58

715 176NR Pacific Clay Products

- Lake Elsinore 2.57 None **1.53 0.208**  **0.00889** 3.58

716 176NR Pacific Clay Products

- Lake Elsinore 5.14 None **3.06 0.416**  **0.0178** 7.16

727 137 Pine Hall

- Madison Plant 9.54 None **5.68 0.771**  **0.0330** 13.3

728 137 Pine Hall

- Madison Plant 9.54 None **5.68 0.771**  **0.0330** 13.3

729 137 Pine Hall

- Madison Plant 13.30 DLA 0.285 0.138 **0.0325** 4.87

730 137 Pine Hall

- Madison Plant 13.30 DLA 0.239 0.153 **0.0325** 4.82

731 137 Pine Hall

- Madison Plant 9.60 None 3.19 0.760 **0.0332** 9.75

732 137 Pine Hall

- Madison Plant 9.60 None 3.19 0.760 **0.0332** 9.75

735 159 Ragland Clay Products 3.36 None **2.00 0.272**  **0.0116** 4.68

742 45 Richards Brick 4.62 None **2.75 0.373**  **0.0160** 6.43

743 45 Richards Brick 4.62 None **2.75 0.373**  **0.0160** 6.43

753 46 Statesville Brick 11.00 None 2.89 **0.889 0.0380**  10.1

754 46 Statesville Brick 9.35 None **5.57 0.756**  **0.0323** 13.0

## B

- 6 Kiln

ID Facility

ID Facility Name Kiln Design

Capacity

(t ph ) APCD HF

Emissions

(lb/hr) HCl

Emissions

(lb/hr) Cl 2 

### Emissions

(lb/hr) Total HCl

Equivalent

(lb/hr) b

758 116 Summit

- Brick Plant and Storage Yard 6.75 None **4.02 0.546**  **0.0233** 9.40

759 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.

- Minerva Plant 1.11 None **0.661 0.0897**  **0.00384** 1.55

760 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.

- Minerva Plant 1.24 None **0.739 0.100**  **0.00429** 1.73

761 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.

- Minerva Plant 1.11 None **0.661 0.0897**  **0.00384** 1.55

762 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.

- Minerva Plant 1.11 None **0.661 0.0897**  **0.00384** 1.55

773 124 Watsontown Brick 7.98 None **4.76 0.645**  **0.0276** 11.1

774 124 Watsontown Brick 10.00 DIFF **0.389 0.280**  **0.0243** 4.08

775 Whit Whitacre Greer 11.90 None **7.09 0.962**  **0.0412** 16.6

776 Whit Whitacre Greer 6.80 None **4.05 0.550**  **0.0235** 9.47

777 147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile 4.90 None **2.92 0.396**  **0.0169** 6.82

a Values in plain font are lb/hr emissions from test data. Values in bold italic underlined font were calculated by multiplying emission factors by APCD and the kiln

design capacity.

b HCl

- equivalent emissions calculated using the equation in Section IV of this memorandum.

## B

- 7 Table B

- 2. Total Facility HCl

- Equivalent Emissions

Facility ID Company Name Facility Name City State Total HCl

E quivalent (lb/hr)

ACME

- 8 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 16.2

ACME

- 9 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 24.5

ACME

- 12 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) Holly Springs MS 11.8

ACME

- 14 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) Kanopolis KS 8.05

ACME

- 1 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) Springfield MN 17.4

ACME

- 18 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 11.7

ACME

- 20 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) Malakoff TX 19.7

ACME

- 21 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 22.5

ACME

- 23 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Wheeler Plant (WTP) Jonesboro AR 9.76

2 American Eagle Brick Co American Eagle Brick Co Sunland Park NM 4.74

BELD

- 1 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 120

BELD

- 2 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 4.29

BORA

- 1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 13.3

BORA

- 2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 19.5

BORA

- 4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 33.4

BORA

- 6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 21.4

BORA

- 7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 13.1

BORA

- 14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 Phenix City AL 19.6

BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Phenix City AL 50.0

181 Certainteed Corporation Certainteed Corporation

- Ludowici New Lexington OH 10.8

19 Cherokee Brick & Tile Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 33.2

34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 29.4

134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 51.2

64 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick

- Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 23.3

83 Cunningham Brick Company, Inc Cunningham

- Cleveland Co Grover NC 12.6

84 Cunningham Brick Company, Inc Cunningham

- Thomasville Thomasville NC 12.4

MOHA

- 4 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 9.92

MOHA

- 6 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky Lewisport KY 7.33

## B

- 8 Facility ID Company Name Facility Name City State Total HCl

E quivalent (lb/hr)

153 Elgin

- Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 4.26

23 Endicott Clay Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 31.9

GENE

- 5 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plant 40 Coosa GA 7.80

GENE

- 8 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants 35 & 36 Blue Ridge (Roanoke) VA 21.1

GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plants 6 & 28 Atkins (Marion) VA 16.8

GENE

- 15 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Corbin

- Plant 33 Woodbine KY 33.8

GENE

- 11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Moncure Facility Moncure NC 32.3

GLEN

- 1 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Bigler Bigler PA 45.1

GLEN

- 2 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Caledonia Caledonia OH 24.8

GLEN

- 3 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Capitol Manassas VA 23.3

GLEN

- 8 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Marseilles Marseilles IL 13.8

GLEN

- 5 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- Redfield Redfield IA 15.2

GLEN

- 10 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

- York York PA 23.2

HANS2 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Athens Athens TX 13.5

HANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant 2 Columbia SC 31.5

HANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Elgin Elgin TX 9.36

HANS7 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Mineral Wells East Mineral Wells TX 11.1

HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Ninety

- Six SC 32.9

HANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Roseboro Roseboro NC 29.2

HANS12 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Stanton Stanton KY 12.9

145 Hebron Brick Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 5.25

184 Ironrock Capital (formerly

Metropolitan Ceramics, Inc.) Ironrock Capital (formerly Metropolitan

Ceramics, Inc.) Canton OH 13.2

35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 52.9

175NR Kansas Brick and Tile Co Kansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 8.36

104 Kasten Clay Products Co Kasten Clay Products Jackson MO 5.21

135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 47.7

50 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 4.36

42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 16.7

139 L.P. McNear Brick Co, Inc McNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 11.4

## B

- 9 Facility ID Company Name Facility Name City State Total HCl

E quivalent (lb/hr)

87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials

- Mica Mica WA 13.4

88 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials

- Newcastle Renton WA 13.6

68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Madison Heights Madison Heights VA 11.8

69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Salem Salem VA 15.9

176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products

- Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore CA 14.3

137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Madison NC 55.8

159 Ragland Clay Products, LLC Ragland Clay Products Ragland AL 4.68

45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 12.9

46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 23.1

116 Summit Pressed Brick and Tile Co Summit

- Brick Plant and Storage Yard Pueblo CO 9.40

186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

- Minerva Plant Minerva OH 6.37

124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 15.2

Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 26.0

147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 6.82

## Appendix C

Estimate of Non

- Hg HAP Metals Emissions (lb/hr) by Kiln

## C

- 1 Table C

- 1. E stimate of Non

- Hg HAP Metals Emissions by Kiln

Kiln ID Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Kiln

Design

Capacity APCD Average

PM

(lb/ton) Average

PM

(lb/hr) Average

non

- Hg

HAP

metals

(lb/hr)

507 ACME

- 8 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Elgin Plant

(ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 10.00 None 0.324 a 3.24 b 0.0356 c

508 ACME

- 8 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Elgin Plant

(ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 19.10 DIFF 0.0100 0.161 0.00271

509 ACME

- 9 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324 a 1.29 b 0.0142 c

510 ACME

- 9 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324 a 1.29 b 0.0142 c

511 ACME

- 9 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324 a 1.29 b 0.0142 c

512 ACME

- 12 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Holly Springs Plant

(HSP) Holly

Springs MS 8.45 None 0.324 a 2.74 b 0.0301 c

513 ACME

- 14 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Kanapolis Plant

(KAP) Kanopolis KS 5.78 None 0.324 a 1.87 b 0.0206 c

500 ACME

- 1 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant

(AOP) Springfield MN 6.25 None 0.324 a 2.02 b 0.0223 c

501 ACME

- 1 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Ochs Brick Plant

(AOP) Springfield MN 6.25 None 0.324 a 2.02 b 0.0223 c

515 ACME

- 18 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Perla Plant

(PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 9.66 None 0.292 d 2.82 b 0.0310 c

516 ACME

- 18 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Perla Plant

(PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 7.86 None 0.292 1.90 0.0209 e

518 ACME

- 20 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Texas Clay Plant

(TCP) Malakoff TX 10.20 DLA 0.106 1.08 0.0119 e

519/520 ACME

- 20 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Texas Clay Plant

(TCP) Malakoff TX 10.20 None 0.324 a 3.30 b 0.0363 c

521 ACME

- 21 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 8.51 None 0.231 1.97 0.0216 e

522 ACME

- 23 Acme Brick Company Acme

- Wheeler Plant

(WTP) Jonesboro AR 7.01 None 0.324 a 2.27 b 0.0250 c

523 2 American Eagle Brick

Co American Eagle Brick Co Sunland

Park NM 3.40 None 0.324 a 1.10 b 0.0121 c

## C

- 2 Kiln ID Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Kiln

Design

Capacity APCD Average

PM

(lb/ton) Average

PM

(lb/hr) Average

non

- Hg

HAP

metals

(lb/hr)

526 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant #2

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 10.65 DIFF 0.0697 0.519 0.00115

527 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant #3

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 13.70 DIFF 0.0770 0.649 0.00372

528/529/

530 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant #6

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 15.96 None 0.391 4.02 0.0443 e

531/532/

533 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant #8

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 23.31 SD/ESP 0.111 2.23 0.0246 e

534/535 BELD

- 1 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant #9

Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 6.10 None 0.664 3.28 0.0361 e

536 BELD

- 2 Belden Brick Company Belden

- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 3.08 None 0.324 a 0.997 b 0.0110 c

537/538 BORA

- 1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 29.94 DIFF 0.00868 0.204 0.00224 e

539 BORA

- 2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 None 0.282 2.63 0.0289 e

540 BORA

- 2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 None 0.282 d 2.63 0.0289 e

545 BORA

- 4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 None 0.324 a 3.89 b 0.0427 c

546 BORA

- 4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 None 0.324 a 3.89 b 0.0427 c

549 BORA

- 6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 None 0.0196 0.116 0.00127 e

550 BORA

- 6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 None 0. 0196 d 0.116 0.00127 e

551/552 BORA

- 7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 22.66 DLA 0.553 11.4 0.125 e

559 BORA

- 14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 None 0.324 a 3.24 b 0.0356 c

560 BORA

- 14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 None 0.324 a 3.24 b 0.0356 c

561 BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 None 0.324 a 3.63 b 0.0399 c

562 BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 None 0.324 a 3.63 b 0.0399 c

563 BORA

- 15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral

- Phenix City

- Plant 4 Phenix City AL 13.50 None 0.324 a 4.37 b 0.0481 c

699 181 Certainteed Corporation Certainteed Corporation

Ludowici New

Lexington OH 7.78 None 0.324 a 2.52 b 0.0277 c

575 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile

Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 None 0.324 a 1.77 b 0.0195 c

## C

- 3 Kiln ID Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Kiln

Design

Capacity APCD Average

PM

(lb/ton) Average

PM

(lb/hr) Average

non

- Hg

HAP

metals

(lb/hr)

576 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile

Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 None 0.324 a 1.77 b 0.0195 c

577/578 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile

Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 29.48 DLA 0.241 7.93 0.0872 e

581 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 7.90 None 0.324 a 2.56 b 0.0281 c

582 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 7.90 None 0.324 a 2.56 b 0.0281 c

583 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 18.30 DLA 0.0477 0.643 0.00708 e

584 134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324 a 3.97 b 0.0437 c

585 134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324 a 3.97 b 0.0437 c

586 134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324 a 3.97 b 0.0437 c

587 64 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick

Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 8.35 None 0.324 a 2.70 b 0.0297 c

588 64 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick

Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 8.35 None 0.324 a 2.70 b 0.0297 c

590 83 Cunningham Brick

Company, Inc Cunningham

- Cleveland

Co Grover NC 9.08 None 0.324 a 2.94 b 0.0323 c

591 84 Cunningham Brick

Company, Inc Cunningham

- Thomasville Thomasville NC 11.55 None 0.324 a 3.74 b 0.0411 c

592 MOHA

- 4 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 3.56 None 0.324 a 1.15 b 0.0127 c

593 MOHA

- 4 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 3.56 None 0.324 a 1.15 b 0.0127 c

178 MOHA

- 6 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport,

Kentucky Lewisport KY 1.75 None 0.243 0.508 0.00559 e

179 MOHA

- 6 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport,

Kentucky Lewisport KY 1.98 None 0.313 0.566 0.00623 e

180 MOHA

- 6 Mohawk Industries Dal

- Tile, Lewisport,

Kentucky Lewisport KY 1.98 None 0.183 0.344 0.00378 e

594 153 Elgin

- Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 None 0.324 a 0.495 b 0.00545 c

595 153 Elgin

- Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 None 0.324 a 0.495 b 0.00545 c

596 23 Endicott Clay Products

Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 None 0.324 a 2.91 b 0.0321 c

## C

- 4 Kiln ID Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Kiln

Design

Capacity APCD Average

PM

(lb/ton) Average

PM

(lb/hr) Average

non

- Hg

HAP

metals

(lb/hr)

597 23 Endicott Clay Products

Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 None 0.324 a 2.91 b 0.0321 c

598 23 Endicott Clay Products

Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 8.86 None 0.324 a 2.87 b 0.0316 c

605 GENE

- 5 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plant

40 Coosa GA 18.75 DIFF 0. 0390 d 0. 655 0.00721 e

606 GENE

- 5 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

- Plant

40 Coosa GA 18.75 DIFF 0.0390 0.655 0.00335

612/613 GENE

- 8 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

Plants 35 & 36 Blue Ridge

(Roanoke) VA 20.20 DLA 0.413 6.11 0.0672 e

614 GENE

- 8 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

Plants 35 & 36 Blue Ridge

(Roanoke) VA 22.00 DLA 0.165 a 3.64 b 0.0400 c

615 GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

Plants 6 & 28 Atkins

(Marion) VA 3.68 None 0.324 a 1.19 b 0.0131 c

616 GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

Plants 6 & 28 Atkins

(Marion) VA 3.68 None 0.324 a 1.19 b 0.0131 c

617 GENE

- 9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick

Plants 6 & 28 Atkins

(Marion) VA 15.02 DLA 0.165 a 2.49 b 0.0273 c

618 GENE

- 15 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Corbin

Plant 33 Woodbine KY 9.90 None 0.324 a 3.21 b 0.0353 c

619 GENE

- 15 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Corbin

Plant 33 Woodbine KY 14.40 None 0.324 a 4.66 b 0.0513 c

622/623 GENE

- 11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Moncure

Facility Moncure NC 27.40 None 0.324 a 8.87 b 0.0976 c

624 GENE

- 11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Moncure

Facility Moncure NC 20.55 DLA 0.0910 d 1. 81 0.0199 e

625 GENE

- 11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale

- Moncure

Facility Moncure NC 20.55 DLA 0.0910 1.81 0.0199 e

635 GLEN

- 1 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Bigler Bigler PA 16.20 None 0.324 a 5.24 b 0.0577 c

## C

- 5 Kiln ID Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Kiln

Design

Capacity APCD Average

PM

(lb/ton) Average

PM

(lb/hr) Average

non

- Hg

HAP

metals

(lb/hr)

636 GLEN

- 1 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Bigler Bigler PA 16.20 None 0.324 a 5.24 b 0.0577 c

637 GLEN

- 2 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Caledonia Caledonia OH 8.89 None 0.324 a 2.88 b 0.0317 c

638 GLEN

- 2 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Caledonia Caledonia OH 8.89 None 0.324 a 2.88 b 0.0317 c

639 GLEN

- 3 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Capitol Manassas VA 17.00 None 0.324 a 5.50 b 0.0605 c

644 GLEN

- 8 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Marseilles Marseilles IL 15.54 DLA 0.178 2.66 0.0292 e

645 GLEN

- 8 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Marseilles Marseilles IL 15.96 DLA 0.262 4.14 0.0456 e

642 GLEN

- 5 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

Redfield Redfield IA 10.94 None 0.324 a 3.54 b 0.0390 c

648 GLEN

- 10 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

York York PA 11.24 None 0.324 a 3.64 b 0.0400 c

649 GLEN

- 10 Glen Gery Glen

- Gery Corporation

York York PA 19.76 DLA 0.0566 0.677 0.00744 e

650 HANS2 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Athens Athens TX 9.53 None 0.250 2.48 0.0272 e

671 HANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant

2 Columbia SC 11.30 None 0.324 a 3.66 b 0.0402 c

672 HANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Columbia

- Plant

2 Columbia SC 11.30 None 0.324 a 3.66 b 0.0402 c

652 HANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Elgin Elgin TX 11.50 None 0.324 a 3.72 b 0.0410 c

653 HANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Elgin Elgin TX 12.20 DIFF 0.0516 0.452 0.00148

656 HANS7 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Mineral Wells

East Mineral

Wells TX 7.99 None 0.324 a 2.59 b 0.0285 c

663 HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Ninety

- Six SC 8.90 None 0.0563 0.433 0.00477 e

664 HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Ninety

- Six SC 8.90 None 0. 0500 d 0. 440 0.00484 e

665 HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Ninety Six Ninety

- Six SC 8.90 None 0.0500 0.440 0.00484 e

## C

- 6 Kiln ID Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Kiln

Design

Capacity APCD Average

PM

(lb/ton) Average

PM

(lb/hr) Average

non

- Hg

HAP

metals

(lb/hr)

667 HANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 None 0.324 a 3.40 b 0.0374 c

668 HANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 None 0.324 a 3.40 b 0.0374 c

669 HANS12 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson

- Stanton Stanton KY 8.00 None 0.376 2.84 0.0312 e

677 145 Hebron Brick Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 9.60 None 0.324 a 3.11 b 0.0342 c

704/705/

706/707 184 Ironrock Capital

(formerly Metropolitan

Ceramics, Inc.) Ironrock Capital (formerly

Metropolitan Ceramics,

Inc.) Canton OH 13.32 None 0.746 8.27 0.0910 e

684 35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 None 0.324 a 3.08 b 0.0338 c

685 35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins

- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 None 0.324 a 3.08 b 0.0338 c

689 175NR Kansas Brick and Tile

Co Kansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 6.00 None 0.324 a 1.94 b 0.0214 c

690 104 Kasten Clay Products

Co Kasten Clay Products Jackson MO 3.74 None 0.324 a 1.21 b 0.0133 c

693 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.24 None 0. 0116 d 0.117 0.00129 e

694 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 9.64 None 0.324 a 3.12 b 0.0343 c

695 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.67 None 0.0116 0.117 0.00129 e

696 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 13.50 DLA 0.0176 0.193 0.00213 e

701 50 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 3.13 None 0.324 a 1.01 b 0.0112 c

702 42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 12.00 None 0.324 a 3.89 b 0.0427 c

703 139 L.P. McNear Brick Co,

Inc McNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 8.20 None 0.324 a 2.65 b 0.0292 c

709 87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials

- Mica Mica WA 9.60 None 0.324 a 3.11 b 0.0342 c

710 88 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials

Newcastle Renton WA 7.52 None 0.324 a 2.44 b 0.0268 c

711 68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Madison

Heights Madison

Heights VA 8.44 None 0.324 a 2.73 b 0.0301 c

712 69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Salem Salem VA 6.77 None 0.324 a 2.19 b 0.0241 c

713 69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia

- Salem Salem VA 4.65 None 0.324 a 1.51 b 0.0166 c

## C

- 7 Kiln ID Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Kiln

Design

Capacity APCD Average

PM

(lb/ton) Average

PM

(lb/hr) Average

non

- Hg

HAP

metals

(lb/hr)

714 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products

Lake Elsinore Lake

Elsinore CA 2.57 None 0.324 a 0.832 b 0.00915 c

715 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products

Lake Elsinore Lake

Elsinore CA 2.57 None 0.324 a 0.832 b 0.00915 c

716 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products

Lake Elsinore Lake

Elsinore CA 5.14 None 0.324 a 1.66 b 0.0183 c

727/728 137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.08 None 0.324 a 6.18 b 0.0679 c

729/730 137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Madison NC 26.60 DLA 0.139 3.47 0.0381 e

731/732 137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall

- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.20 None 0.324 a 6.22 b 0.0684 c

735 159 Ragland Clay Products,

LLC Ragland Clay Products Ragland AL 3.36 None 0.324 a 1.09 b 0.0120 c

742 45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 4.62 None 0.324 a 1.50 b 0.0165 c

743 45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 4.62 None 0.324 a 1.50 b 0.0165 c

753 46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 11.00 None 0.324 a 3.56 b 0.0392 c

754 46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 9.35 None 0.324 a 3.03 b 0.0333 c

758 116 Summit Pressed Brick

and Tile Co Summit

- Brick Plant and

Storage Yard Pueblo CO 6.75 None 0.324 a 2.19 b 0.0240 c

759 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Minerva OH 1.11 None 0.324 a 0.359 b 0.00395 c

760 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Minerva OH 1.24 None 0.324 a 0.401 b 0.00442 c

761 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Minerva OH 1.11 None 0.324 a 0.359 b 0.00395 c

762 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.

-

Minerva Plant Minerva OH 1.11 None 0.324 a 0.359 b 0.00395 c

773 124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 7.98 None 0.324 a 2.58 b 0.0284 c

774 124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 10.00 DIFF 0.0555 a 0.555 b 0.00610 c

775 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 11.90 None 0.641 5.83 0.0641 e

776 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 6.80 None 0.324 a 2.20 b 0.0242 c

## C

- 8 Kiln ID Facility

ID Company Name Facility Name City State Kiln

Design

Capacity APCD Average

PM

(lb/ton) Average

PM

(lb/hr) Average

non

- Hg

HAP

metals

(lb/hr)

777 147 Yankee Hill Brick and

Tile Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 4.90 None 0.324 a 1.59 b 0.0174 c

a No PM or HAP metals test data available; value is emission factor based on APCD.

b No PM or HAP metals test data available; value calculated by multiplying lb/ton value and kiln capacity.

c No PM or HAP metals test data available; value calculated by mult iplying lb/hr PM emissions and average percentage of PM that is metal HAP (1.1%).

d No PM test data available, assigned same lb/ton value as tested identical kiln at the same facility.

e Kiln not tested for HAP metals; value calculated by multiplying lb/hr PM emissions and average percentage of PM that is metal HAP (1.1%).