alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                  Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and
                  the Chief Financial Officer of Knology, Inc.
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.s.1350

     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Knology, Inc. (the "Company") that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2002                  By: /s/ Rodger L. Johnson
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Rodger L. Johnson
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 14, 2002                  By: /s/ Robert K. Mills
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Robert K. Mills
                                        Chief Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3467 

To establish a moratorium on aerial surveillance conducted by the 

Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2012 

Mr. JOHANNS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To establish a moratorium on aerial surveillance conducted 

by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MORATORIUM. 

4 (a) DEFINITION OF AERIAL SURVEILLANCE.—In this 

5 section, the term ‘‘aerial surveillance’’ means any surveil6 lance from the air, including— 

7 (1) surveillance conducted from fixed-wing air8 craft, helicopters, drones, or remote-controlled air9 craft; or 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3467 IS

1 (2) the use of aerial or satellite images, regard2 less of whether the images are publicly available. 

3 (b) MORATORIUM.—During the 1-year period begin4 ning on the date of enactment of this Act, the Adminis5 trator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall not 

6 conduct aerial surveillance in exercising any authority. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Summary of Meeting Between Environmental Health and Safety Communications (EHSCP) and 

EPA Staff

August 9, 2011

List of Attendees

Greg Schaner, EPA

Brian Jenschke, Titan Engineering

Richard Davis, Beveridge and Diamond

Barbara Patton, AT&T

Julianna Barnom, Verizon

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, the following issues were discussed:

Characteristics of linear communications construction projects;

Clarifications of proposed permit requirements;

The need for flexibility for linear communications construction projects with regard to 

certain proposed permit provisions (e.g., perimeter controls, entrance and exit points, 

requirement to install stormwater controls prior to disturbances; fueling areas and staging 

and storage area requirements; off-site storage areas);and

The definition of emergency-related projects.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of LIVESTAR Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Ray Hawkins, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.

_______________________
Ray HawkinsPrincipal Executive Officer April 14, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LIVESTAR Entertainment Group, Inc.
and will be retained by LIVESTAR Entertainment Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Ionospheric current source modeling and global geomagnetic induction using ground geomagnetic observatory data      

      October 1, 2015    

Long-period global-scale electromagnetic induction studies of deep Earth conductivity are based almost exclusively on magnetovariational methods and require accurate models of external source spatial structure. We describe approaches to inverting for both the external sources and three-dimensional (3-D) conductivity variations and apply these methods to long-period (T≥1.2 days) geomagnetic observatory data. Our scheme involves three steps: (1) Observatory data from 60 years (only partly overlapping and with many large gaps) are reduced and merged into dominant spatial modes using a scheme based on frequency domain principal components. (2) Resulting modes are inverted for corresponding external source spatial structure, using a simplified conductivity model with radial variations overlain by a two-dimensional thin sheet. The source inversion is regularized using a physically based source covariance, generated through superposition of correlated tilted zonal (quasi-dipole) current loops, representing ionospheric source complexity smoothed by Earth rotation. Free parameters in the source covariance model are tuned by a leave-one-out cross-validation scheme. (3) The estimated data modes are inverted for 3-D Earth conductivity, assuming the source excitation estimated in step 2. Together, these developments constitute key components in a practical scheme for simultaneous inversion of the catalogue of historical and modern observatory data for external source spatial structure and 3-D Earth conductivity.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Anna Kelbert, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geomagnetism Program

akelbert@usgs.gov

303-273-8448

## Related Content

#### Anna Kelbert, Ph.D.

##### Research Geophysicist

Geomagnetism Program

akelbert@usgs.gov

303-273-8448

### Contact

#### Geologic Hazards Science Center

1711 Illinois St.Golden, CO80401United States

303-273-8500

### Explore Search

                  - Natural Hazards

View All **
ex10_17.htm


Exhibit 10.17


AMENDMENT TO THE


MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.


2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


July 11, 2011


 


WHEREAS, Mueller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Mueller Industries, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15(a) of the Plan, the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend the Plan at any time; and


 


WHEREAS, the Board has determined it to be in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 



	  	
1.

	
Section 2(p) thereof shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


	  	  	
“(p)           “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date when the Stock is listed on one or more national securities exchanges, the mean between the highest and lowest sale prices of the Stock reported on the principal national securities exchange on which such Stock is listed and traded on the date of determination, or, if there is no such sale on that date, then on the last preceding date on which such a sale was reported.  If the Stock is not listed on an exchange, or representative quotes are not otherwise available, the Fair Market Value shall mean the amount determined by the Board in good faith, and in a manner consistent with Section 409A of the Code, to be the fair market value per share of Stock.”   


 


	  	
2.

	
Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be construed and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to conflicts of laws principles thereof which might refer such interpretations to the laws of a different state or jurisdiction.


 


	  	
3.

	
Full Force and Effect of the Plan.  Except as specifically amended herein, all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.   


 












 



	  	
Mueller Industries, Inc.


	  	
Board of Directors


	  	
July 11, 2011
1220 L Street, Northwest Thomas M. Gray 

Washington, DC 20005-4070 Regulatory & Scientific Affairs 

Tel 202-682-8479 

Fax 202-682-8031 

E-mail grayt@api.org

May 4, 2010 

Karl Simon 

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Mail Code 6406J 

Washington, DC 20460 

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: Third Draft 

Final Report: Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate : A Two-Generation Whole-Body Inhalation 

Reproduction Toxicity Study in Rats (Study No. 00-4208) 

Dear Mr. Simon: 

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is 

submitting the following information for EPA review and approval as partial fulfillment of the CAA 

Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation: 

• Third Draft Final Report: Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate: A Two-Generation WholeBody Inhalation Reproduction Toxicity Study in Rats (Study No. 00-4208)

• Reviewer Checklist 

The Third Draft Final Report addresses all EPA and independent reviewer comments as indicated, with 

page citation, in the Reviewer Checklist. 

When the RG receives EPA’s approval of the third draft report, the final study report will be submitted to 

you at the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs 

Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-

07). If you require further information, please contact Tom Gray by mail at this address. 

Regards, 

Thomas M. Gray 

Encl (2): 

• Third Draft Final Report: Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate: A Two-Generation Whole-Body 

Inhalation Reproduction Toxicity Study in Rats (Study No. 00-4208) 

• Reviewer Checklist 

 

cc: Joe Sopata, EPA
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.**

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Theundersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc.(the “Company”) that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained inthis Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 13, 2003 |   /s/  Robert K. Mills |   |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                              | Robert K.  Mills                 |   |
|                              | Chief  Financial Officer         |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code  I, Michael J. Marx, the Chief Financial Officer of Nano Mask, Inc. (Nano Mask), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the accompanying Form 10-K of Nano Mask for the year ended December 30, 2009 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nano Mask.   /s/ Michael J. Marx Michael J. Marx Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  September 9, 2011
CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp. (the
        Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin
        Kwong, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
  (1)    
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
        Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.
   Dated:
                September 14, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Edwin
                KwongEdwin
                KwongPrincipal
                Financial Officer
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        JUPITER Global Holdings, Corp. and will be retained by JUPITER Global Holdings,
        Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
##### 



CENTERPLATE, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006(In thousands except for ratio)Income (loss) before income taxes
    
    
    4,309
    
    
    
    (10,755
    )
    
    
    1,353
    
    
    
    (8,441
    )
    
    
    3,248Add Fixed Charges:Interest Expense
    
    
    19,311
    
    
    
    25,856
    
    
    
    23,195
    
    
    
    27,800
    
    
    
    21,791Amortization of loan costs
    
    
    1,431
    
    
    
    6,907
    
    
    
    1,815
    
    
    
    3,474
    
    
    
    2,569Interest factor in rents
    
    
    865
    
    
    
    788
    
    
    
    787
    
    
    
    924
    
    
    
    886Total earnings as defined
    
    
    25,916
    
    
    
    22,796
    
    
    
    27,150
    
    
    
    23,757
    
    
    
    28,494Fixed Charges:Interest Expense
    
    
    19,311
    
    
    
    25,856
    
    
    
    23,195
    
    
    
    27,800
    
    
    
    21,791Amortization of loan costs
    
    
    1,431
    
    
    
    6,907
    
    
    
    1,815
    
    
    
    3,474
    
    
    
    2,569Interest factor in rents
    
    
    865
    
    
    
    788
    
    
    
    787
    
    
    
    924
    
    
    
    88621,607
    
    
    
    33,551
    
    
    
    25,797
    
    
    
    32,198
    
    
    
    25,246Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.1Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (10,755
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (8,441
    )
    
    
    
**Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Quest Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wilf Ouellette, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* that:

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the*Securities Exchange Act of 1934* , and

 

 

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2010                                                                                                                                                        

 

 

*/s/ Wilf Ouellette*

 

Wilf Ouellette,

 

Director, President, Chief Executive Officer

 

                              **
# L_2004197EN.01000801.xml

| 4.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 197/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 197/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1072/2004

of 3 June 2004

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004 of 19 May 2004 on a special intervention measure for cereals in Finland and Sweden (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats produced in Finland and Sweden for export from Finland and Sweden to all third countries, with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania was opened pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004.

| (2) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 28 May to 3 June 2004 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of oats issued in Regulation (EC) No 1005/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 3 June 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2003 (OJ L 203, 12.8.2003, p. 16).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 28.

3

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

TYRELL LEWIS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-4029

D.C. No.

3:14-cr-00369-W-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 20, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, RAWLINSON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Tyrell Lewis appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 

revocation of his supervised release and sentence of four months’ imprisonment 

and four years’ supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), Lewis’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-4029

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Lewis 

the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or 

answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

______________________________

 )

 )

In re: ) CASE NO. 19-18883-BKC-RAM

 ) CHAPTER 7

VERNELL ROBINSON, ) 

 )

Debtor. ) 

______________________________)

ORDER SETTING FURTHER HEARING ON DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT

The Court conducted a preliminary hearing on April 16, 2020, 

on Debtor’s Amended Motion for Contempt Against Regional 

Acceptance Corporation (the “Motion”) [DE #60]. At the hearing, 

Debtor’s counsel announced that the parties are in the process of 

finalizing a settlement agreement. Therefore, and as announced on 

the record at the hearing, it is -

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 16, 2020.

Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 64 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court will conduct a further hearing on the Motion

on May 7, 2020 at 11:30 AM at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, C. Clyde 

Atkins United States Courthouse, 301 North Miami Avenue, Courtroom 

4, Miami, Florida 33128. If hearings have not resumed at the 

courthouse, the hearing will be conducted telephonically and all 

counsel must arrange to appear through CourtCall.

2. If the parties finalize a settlement agreement prior to 

May 7, 2020, the Debtor shall file a notice of withdrawal of its 

Motion. If the notice is filed prior to May 7, 2020, the Court 

will cancel the May 7, 2020 hearing on the Motion.

###

COPIES TO:

Lawrence M. Shoot, Esq.

Dennis J. LeVine, Esq.

Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 64 Filed 04/17/20 Page 2 of 2
7/10/2015 0900006481b7bd6c

UA Aircraft Serial Number **Month** August **Year** 2015 UAS Date (issue Discovered) Date (issue addressed) Issue (Descritpion & Maintenance conducted Maintenance (Performed by: Print & Sign) Software (updates) Airframe Engines Propellers Camera-gimbal Landing Gear Vibration Dampening Other