alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Transaction Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence Chimerine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.





Date:  May 13, 2011/s/  Lawrence ChimerinePrincipal Accounting Officer

First Transaction Management, Inc.





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2023

No. 04-22-00289-CR

Chad Wade SPENCE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CRW2101019

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 On October 7, 2022, appellant filed a pro se motion asking us to abate this 

appeal and “order the appointment of new appellate counsel.” “Appointment of 

new counsel is a matter solely within the discretion of the trial court.” Solis v. 

State, 792 S.W.2d 95, 100 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). Accordingly, in the interest of 

justice, we GRANT appellant’s motion and ABATE this appeal. We ORDER

the clerk of this court to forward appellant’s October 7, 2022 “Motion Requesting 

Abatement of Appeal and Appointment of New Appellate Counsel” to the trial 

court, the attorney for the state, and appellant’s current counsel of record. We 

ORDER the trial court to: (1) hold a hearing on appellant’s motion; (2) determine 

whether appellant is entitled to the appointment of new appellate counsel; and (3) 

sign an order either appointing new counsel or denying appellant’s motion by 

March 1, 2023. We further ORDER the District Clerk of Wilson County and the 

court reporter to file supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records containing: (1) 

any motions or other filings related to this matter; (2) the trial court’s order on 

appellant’s October 7, 2022 motion; (3) the trial court’s order appointing new 

counsel, if any; and (4) the transcript of the trial court’s hearing on this matter by 

March 13, 2023.

 

 In light of this order, we WITHDRAW our December 7, 2022 on-briefs 

submission of this case. This appeal will be re-submitted at a later date.
It is so ORDERED January 30, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
Exhibit 10.2







PROMISSORY NOTE








	
$5,569.32

	
September 30, 2011












FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Maker promises to pay to the order of Joseph A. Geraci, II at such place as the holder of this Note may designate in writing to Maker, the principal sum of Five Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-nine and 32/100 ($5,569.32), together with simple interest on the unpaid principal balance from the date of this Note paid at the rate of twelve percent (12.0%) per annum.  Principal and interest are due and payable in lawful money of the United States of America.







Principal payments and accrued interest are due as follows:








	
·  

	
Interest payments shall be due on the last day of each month;








	
·  

	
Principal shall be due on March 31, 2012.












This Note may not be fully or partially prepaid at any time during the term of this Note.







If default occurs in the payment of any amount due under this Note when due, the entire principal balance and accrued but unpaid interest under this Note shall at once become due and payable, without notice, at the option of the holder of this Note.  Any failure to exercise such option shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise it in the event of any subsequent default.







Maker waives presentment, dishonor, protest, demand, diligence, notice of protest, notice of demand, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, and any other notice of any kind otherwise required by law in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default, enforcement or collection of this Note and expressly agrees that this Note, or any payment hereunder, may be extended or subordinated (by forbearance or otherwise) at any time, without in any way affecting the liability of Maker. Maker agrees to pay on demand Payee’s reasonable collection


costs to enforce payment due under this note.







This Note may not be amended or modified, nor shall any waiver of any provision hereof be effective, except only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of any amendment, modification, or waiver is sought.  This Note shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Minnesota.








	  	
MAKER:

	
/s/ Douglas Polinsky


	  	  	
Poker Magic, Inc.


	  	  	  
	  	
PAYEE:

	
/s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II


	  	  	
Joseph A. Geraci, II
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2800 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2800

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on volleyballs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on volleyballs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VOLLEYBALLS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to volleyballs) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
exhibi10_294.htm




EXHIBIT 10.29.4







PROMISSORY NOTE


















	$	9,966,840.39	 	
October 6, 2011



























Mission West Properties, L.P., Mission West Properties, L.P. I, Mission West Properties, L.P. II, and Mission West Properties, L.P. III (collectively referred to herein as “Mission”)








	
promises to pay to

	
The Berg Group












the principal sum of Nine Million Nine Hundred Sixty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Dollars and 39 Cents ($9,966,840.39),







plus interest at the rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 1.75 percent per annum (compounded on the basis of a 366-day year) beginning on the 6th day of October, 2011.







Should interest not so be paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest when due, the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note.  Should suit be commenced or an attorney employed to enforce the payment of this note, we agree to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney’s fees in said suit. Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States.







Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States no later than December 31, 2011.  Notwithstanding the above, Mission shall use its best efforts to repay the loan as soon as possible using all available sources of cash, including but not limited to cash generated from operations and cash available from any other financing sources.













	
Signed By:

	
/s/ Raymond V. Marino

	  	
10/6/11


	  	
Raymond V. Marino, Pres. & COO

	  	
Date


	  	
Mission West Properties, Inc.

	  	  
	  	
Its General Partner

	  	  











	
Acknowledged:

	
/s/ Carl E. Berg

	  	
10/6/11


	  	
Carl E. Berg

	  	
Date
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3231 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3231

  To provide for the issuance and sale of a semipostal by the United 
    States Postal Service to support effective programs targeted at 
        improving permanency outcomes for youth in foster care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2012

  Mr. Kerry (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 
 Wyden, and Mr. Cochran) introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the issuance and sale of a semipostal by the United 
    States Postal Service to support effective programs targeted at 
        improving permanency outcomes for youth in foster care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Families for Foster Youth Stamp Act 
of 2012''.

SEC. 2. FAMILIES FOR FOSTER YOUTH SEMIPOSTAL.

    (a) In General.--In order to increase funding for effective 
programs targeted at improving permanency outcomes for youth in foster 
care, the United States Postal Service shall, for a period of not less 
than 4 years, provide for the issuance and sale of a semipostal, in 
accordance with section 416 of title 39, United States Code.
    (b) Disposition of Amounts.--
            (1) Adoption opportunities program.--Fifty percent of any 
        amounts becoming available from the sale of the semipostal 
        under this Act shall be transferred to the Secretary of Health 
        and Human Services for programs and activities authorized under 
        section 203 of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment and 
        Adoption Reform Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 5113) that specifically 
        target improvement in permanency outcomes for youth in foster 
        care through adoption, guardianship, or kinship care.
            (2) State court improvement program.--Fifty percent of any 
        amounts becoming available from the sale of the semipostal 
        under this Act shall be transferred to the Secretary of Health 
        and Human Services for programs and activities authorized under 
        section 438 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 629h).
    (c) Definition.--In this Act, the term ``semipostal'' has the 
meaning given that term in section 416 of title 39, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3373 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3373

 To require the Attorney General to issue a report on the Alaska Rural 
                Justice and Law Enforcement Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2012

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Attorney General to issue a report on the Alaska Rural 
                Justice and Law Enforcement Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON ALASKA RURAL JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT 
              COMMISSION.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Attorney General, in consultation with the Attorney General of the 
State of Alaska, the Commissioner of Public Safety of the State of 
Alaska, the Alaska Federation of Natives, and federally recognized 
Indian tribes in the State of Alaska, shall submit to Congress a report 
on whether the Alaska Rural Justice and Law Enforcement Commission 
established under section 112(a)(2) of division B of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108-199; 118 Stat. 62) should be 
continued and appropriations authorized for the continued work of the 
Commission. The report may contain recommendations for legislation with 
respect to the scope of work and composition of the Commission.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Asia4Sale.com, Inc., (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Eric Montandon, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

January 23, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
November 4, 2011 Exhibit 10.1





Exhibit 10.1


IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH
 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA




GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION


CASE NO.  11-36110 CA 31

















SOCIUS CG II, LTD., a Bermuda 

exempted company,



Plaintiff,



v.



ZOOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

a Delaware corporation,



Defendant.

_________________________________________/


 

AGREED ORDER GRANTING JOINT EXPEDITED 

MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on November 3, 2011, on the Joint Expedited Motion
for Order Approving Stipulation for Settlement of Claim (the "Motion") filed by Plaintiff, Socius CG II, Ltd.
("Socius"), and Defendant, Zoom Technologies, Inc. ("Zoom").  The Court, having reviewed the Motion and other
pertinent portions of the record, noting the Stipulation for Settlement of Claim reflecting the agreement of the parties (the
"Stipulation"), having heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows:





	The Court approves the Stipulation and finds that terms and conditions of the issuance to Socius of
2,200,000 shares of common stock of Zoom ("Common Stock") in exchange for the settlement of Socius's claim against
Zoom in the amount of $2,500,000 are fair, reasonable and adequate.  





                CASE NO. 11-36110 CA31      




	Accordingly, the Common Stock shall constitute exempted securities under Section 3(a)(10) of the
Securities Act of 1933.


	The parties shall fully comply with all terms and conditions of the Stipulation, which are incorporated herein
by this reference. 


	This action is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.  The Court retains jurisdiction for
purposes of enforcing the Stipulation.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida, this 3rd day of November,
2011.


/s/ John Schlesinger

    CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE


















Copies furnished to:

   Mark A. Salky, Esq.

   Adrienne Ward, Esq.

   Scott J. Weiselberg, Esq.




                                           2
No. 03

- 15

- 00 735- CR

____________________________________________________

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

____________________________________________________

VICTOR ROSALES, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

____________________________________________________

ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE 299 TH DISTRICT COURT

OF TRAVIS COUNTY IN CAUSE NO. D-1- DC

- 14 -300723

____________________________________________________

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

____________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Comes now Victor Rosales, appellant, and would show the Court the

following:

I.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and a jury assessed

punishment at 40 years. Notice of appeal was filed and the appeal docketed in this

Court. ACCEPTED

03-15-00735-CR

11221043

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/20/2016 9:59:56 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 II.

The clerk’s record was filed on February 24, 2016. The reporter’s record

was filed on May 18, 2016. Appellant’s brief is due on June 23, 2016.

I II.

Appellant seeks a 60 day extension of the current deadline in which to file

Appellant’s brief, up to and including, August 22, 2016.

IV.

This request is based on the following facts which prev ent counsel for

Appellant from preparing the brief by the current deadline:

The record in this cause is voluminous. It is comprised of 10 volumes and

an electronic exhibit admitted at trial. Counsel has not had an opportunity to

review the record and pr epare Appellant’s brief by June 23, 2016. Filing of the

brief cannot be accomplished by the current deadline while still effectively

representing Appellant on direct appeal to this Court.

Additionally, since the time the reporter’s record was filed in th is cause,

counsel for appellant has prepared and filed an appellant’s brief in Cunningham v.

State in the Sixth Court of Appeals and an applicant’s brief in Ex parte Watkins in

the 207 th District Court of Comal County and the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Counsel has a brief due in the Court of Criminal Appeals in Ex parte Wimberly on

June 24, 2016.3 V.

This is Appellant’s first request for an extension of time to file Appellant’s

brief.

P rayer

Appellant requests this Cou rt grant the motion and extend the time to file

Appellant’s brief by 6 0 days, up to and including August 22, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Richard E. Wetzel

Richard E. Wetzel

State Bar No. 21236300

1411 West Ave., Suite 100

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 469

- 7943

(512) 474

- 5594

wetzel_law@1411west.com

Attorney for Appellant

Victor Rosales

C ertificate of Service

This is to certify a true and correct copy of this pleading was sent by email

to Counsel for the State of Texas, Scott Taliaferro, Assistant District Attorney, at

Scott.Taliaferro@traviscountytx.gov on this the 20 th day of June, 2016.

/s/Richard E. Wetzel

Richard E. Wetzel

State Bar No. 21236300
Present: All the Justices 

ROBERT SCOTT LYNN 

 PER CURIAM 

v. Record No. 981146 February 26, 1999 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

 We awarded this appeal to review a judgment of the Court of 

Appeals of Virginia holding that the Circuit Court of Rockbridge 

County properly refused defendant's proffered Instruction L on 

"cooling off," Instruction O on "right to arm," and Instruction 

S on "relative strength and size" of the parties. Lynn v. 

Commonwealth, 27 Va. App. 336, 499 S.E.2d 1 (1998). 

 For the reasons stated on the above issues in the opinion 

of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment entered 

below. 

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 20.2


                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON COMPLIANCE


Board of Directors
WFS Financial Inc

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, the consolidated statement of financial condition of WFS
Financial Inc and Subsidiaries (WFS) as of December 31, 1999 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
the year then ended, and have issued our report thereon dated January 18, 2000.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to
believe that WFS failed to, in all material respects, comply with the terms,
covenants, provisions or conditions of the Sale and Servicing Agreements for WFS
Financial Auto Loans, Inc. date February 1, 1999, July 1, 1999, November 1, 1999
between Bankers Trust Company, Chase Manhattan Bank, and WFS insofar as they
relate to accounting matters. However, it should be noted that our audit was not
directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of noncompliance.

This report is intended for the use and information of the Board of Directors
and management of WFS, Bankers Trust Company and Chase Manhattan Bank and should
not be used for any other purposes.


                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Los Angeles, California
January 18, 2000