alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Transaction Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence Chimerine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.





Date:  May 13, 2011/s/  Lawrence ChimerineChief Executive Officer and President

First Transaction Management, Inc.





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code



Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Michael J. Hagan, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of NutriSystem, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



| | 1) | The Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 3, 2003 |  | /S/ MICHAEL J. HAGAN                             
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
### 63 

### 0FEB 

## ARIZONADEPARTMENT OFENVIRON

FIFESYMINGTON. GOVERNOR EDWARD 2. FOX. DIRECTOR February 3, 1992
Daniel McGovern Regional Administrator U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105

RE: SUBMITTAL OF HAYDEN/MIAMI AND PAUL SPUR STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISIONS
Dear Mr.

# Vnd
Consistent with the provisions of A.R.S. 

### 5 49-424.A. (copy enclosed), 40 CFR 51.40 and 40 CFR 51.103, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) submitted to theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as revisions to the State Implementation Plan

(SIP), five copies each of the Hayden/MiamiNonattainmentArea Plan on October 16, 1989 and of the Paul Spur Nonattainment Area Plan ; 

## .. on June 25, 1990. ADEQ is requesting that EPA consider these submittals as meeting the November 15, 1991, PMIOSIP submittal deadline. All information necessary for processing these submittals was included with the original transmittals. In response to your recent request, addenda to theHayden/Miami and Paul Spur NAA plans are also enclosed. These addenda identify which EPA Reasonably Available Control Measures are unnecessary to reach attainment,which measures cannot be reasonably implemented, and which measures are required by the SIP for each area. If you require additisnal infornation,please contact Xaney Wrona, Assistant Director for Air Quality, at (602) 257-2308 or Ira Domsky,Manager of the Air Quality Planning Section, at (602) 257- 2321. Thank you for your consideration in this important matter.

Enclosures The Department of Environmental Quality isAn Equal OpportunityAfirmative Action Employer. PostOffice Box 600 Phoenix,Arizona85001-0600 Recycled Paper
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000479

22-JUL-2016

08:44 AM
EXHIBIT 10.20


 


ENTERPRISE BANCORP, INC.


 


 


Description
of Directors’ Compensation


 


                Enterprise Bancorp, Inc.
(the “Company”) pays no separate compensation to its directors for their
service as members of the Company’s board of directors.  As of January 1, 2008, the Company’s
principal subsidiary, Enterprise Bank and Trust Company (the “Bank”), pays the
following fees on a per meeting and annual retainer basis to members of its
board of directors and board of directors committees, except that directors who
are also full-time salaried employees of the Bank are not paid any fees for any
of their services as directors:


 


Per
Meeting Fees


 


·                  Board of Directors meetings - $350


 


·                  Executive Committee meetings - $350


 


·                  Audit Committee meetings - $350


 


·                  All other committee meetings - $250


 


Annual
Retainer Fees


 


·                  All directors - $7,200


 


·                  All members of Executive Committee - $1,800


 


·                  Secretary - $500


 


·                  Chairs of following committees:


 


·                  Audit - $7,500


 


·                  Asset-Liability - $6,000


 


·                  Compensation - $6,000


 


·                  Investment Advisory Group - $6,000


 


·                  Corporate Governance/Nominating - $6,000


 


·                  Loan - $6,000


 


·                  Banking Technology Steering - $6,000


 


·                  Audit Committee Vice-Chairperson - $4,000


 


Directors
also have the right to make an irrevocable election for each year (by no later
than December 31st of the preceding year) to receive shares of
the Company’s common stock in lieu of receiving an elected portion of cash
fees.  The number of shares issued to
directors pursuant to this election is based on the fair market value of the
common stock as of the first trading day of the year for which the election
applies.
ex10-2.htm



Exhibit 10.2
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3255 

For the relief of Miguel Santillan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Miguel Santillan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Miguel Santillan 

7 shall be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, and 

8 remained in, the United States, and shall be eligible for 

9 adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 

10 for permanent residence under section 245 of the Immi11 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing 

12 an application for such adjustment of status. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3255 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust3 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

4 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

5 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

6 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Miguel 

7 Santillan, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

8 officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next following 

9 fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

10 made available to natives of the country of the birth of 

11 Miguel Santillan under section 202(a)(2) of the Immigra12 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2810 

To reduce temporarily the duty on golf club iron heads. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on golf club iron heads. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GOLF CLUB IRON HEADS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Golf club iron heads (provided for in subheading 

9506.39.00) ........................... 3 % No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2810 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        3,382,529
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   102,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              3,567,798
<PP&E>                                          281,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                   59,727
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4,990,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           316,149
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          9,917
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,990,371
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                125,901
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (2,480,434)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2,354,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2,354,533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (554,107)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2,908,640)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.31)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO

                      AMENDED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                                FERRO CORPORATION


         Albert C. Bersticker, President and Paul B. Campbell, Secretary of
Ferro Corporation (the "Corporation"), an Ohio corporation for profit with its
principal location at Cleveland, Ohio, do hereby certify that a meeting of the
shareholders of the Corporation entitling them to vote on the proposal to amend
the Amended Articles of Incorporation thereof, as contained in the following
resolutions, was duly called and held on April 22, 1994, at which meeting a
quorum of such shareholders was present in person or in proxy, and that by the
affirmative vote of the shareholders entitling them to exercise at least
two-thirds of the voting power of the Corporation on such proposal the following
resolution was adopted to amend the Amended Articles of Incorporation:

                  RESOLVED, by the shareholders of Ferro Corporation that the
                  first paragraph of Article Fourth of the Amended Articles of
                  Incorporation of the Corporation be and the same is hereby
                  amended so that, as amended, such Article shall be and read as
                  follows:

                                    "FOURTH: The number of shares which the
                           Corporation is authorized to have outstanding is
                           152,000,000, consisting of 2,000,000 shares of Serial
                           Preferred Stock without Par Value (hereinafter called
                           "Serial Preferred Stock") and 150,000,000 shares of
                           Common Stock of the Par Value of $1.00 each
                           (hereinafter called "Common Stock")."


<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above-named officers, acting for and on behalf
of the Corporation, have subscribed their names this 21st day of December, 1994.


                                               /s/ Albert C. Bersticker
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Albert C. Bersticker
                                               President


                                               /s/ Paul B. Campbell
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Paul B. Campbell
                                               Secretary

                                       2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40153

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NOE SIFUENTES-FLORES, also known as Carlos Solares-Hernandez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-102-ALL

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court affirmed the sentence of Noe Sifuentes-Flores (Sifuentes).

United States v. Sifuentes-Flores, 145 F. App'x 497, 498 (5th Cir. 2005). The

Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Lopez

v. Gonzales, 127 S. Ct. 625 (2006).
No. 05-40153

2

Sifuentes has been deported. He therefore would not legally be able to

attend any resentencing, as is required by FED. R. CRIM.P. 43, should this court

remand his case. We are unable to grant Sifuentes relief. His appeal is moot

and is dismissed. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83

(5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (June 25, 2007) (No. 06-12082).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            180,809
<SECURITIES>                                       50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  252,673
<PP&E>                                            135,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                     20,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,024,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              69,423
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          167,469
<OTHER-SE>                                        787,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,024,833
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   14,777
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,420,857
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,406,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,406,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,406,080)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.09)



</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 27, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00562

- CV

James D. SCUDDAY

, Appellant

v.

Austin KING , Tierra Linda Ranch Homeowners Association , Jerry Adams, Bob Dockey, Mary

La France, Tammy Haney, Denise Chambers and Dimas Lopez,

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court

, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14446

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Justice Beth Watkins , Justice

On December 10, 2021, this court issued a letter denying “all requests for oral argument”

and informing the parties that this appeal would be submitted on briefs on January 11, 2022

before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, and

Justice Beth Watkins. On December 16, 2021, appellant filed a motion seeking reconsideration

of the court’s decision to deny oral argument. After consideration, we DENY appellant’s motion.

It is so ORDERED December 27 , 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
# C_2004209EN.01000701.xml

| 19.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3487 — PGA/GGBA)

(2004/C 209/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 20 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3487. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3487. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00119-CR

Timothy Cantu DEL RIO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR5483

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due August 10, 2022. On August 15, 2022, counsel for 

appellant moved for a thirty-day extension to September 9, 2022. The motion was granted. On 

September 9, 2022, appellant’s counsel sought a second extension of time, to October 10, 2022. 

On September 12, 2022, this court granted the motion. Counsel was cautioned that the court does 

not ordinarily grant extensions of more than sixty days beyond the original due date. 4TH TEX. 

APP. (San Antonio) LOC. R. 8, Notes and Comments. 

On October 12, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed a motion for a third extension of time to 

file appellant’s brief, requesting until November 9, 2022. The motion is granted in part. We 

order Cathy S. Compton to file appellant’s brief by November 8, 2022. Counsel is advised that 

no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion, filed by the date the brief is due, 

that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court 

of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable 

assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The 

court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance. If 

the brief or a conforming motion is not filed by the date ordered, the court may abate this appeal 

and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or his counsel 

has abandoned the appeal. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

FILE COPY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY