alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                     
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2010 |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson               
|                   |  | Rodger L. Johnson                   
|                   |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA-22-0173

KARL KNUCHEL

WEBSTER CRIST

Karl Knuchel, P.C.

101 North E Street

P.O. Box 953

Livingston, MT 59047

Telephone: 406/222-0135

Email: karl@knuchelpc.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS

____________________________________________________

KELLI JONES (F/K/A KELLI ) 

PARKER), )

 )

 )

Petitioner/Appellee, ) 

 and ) 

 ) 

KEVIN PARKER and STACY )

SNAVELY, ) 

 ) ORDER GRANTING 

 Respondents/Appellants.) EXTENSION

Appeal from Cause No. DR 09-106 in the Sixth Judicial District Court of 

Montana, Park County, Judge Brenda Gilbert

07/05/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0173
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Karl Knuchel

Karl Knuchel, P.C.

101 North E Street, P.O. Box 953

Livingston, MT 59047

(406) 222-0135

karl@knuchelpc.com

Counsel for Respondents and Appellants

Kevin Brown

Paoli & Brown, P.C.

116 West Callender

Livingston, MT 59047

(406) 222-4420

kevin@paolibrown.com

Counsel for Petitioner and Appellee

UPON review of the Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time to 

File Opening Brief by counsel for the Respondents/Appellants herein and good 

cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time to file Appellant’s Opening 

Brief is extended to the 11th day of August.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

cc: Karl Knuchel

Kevin Brown

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 5 2022
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 250 ) ll-K - (I ) -6 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57AM

Sheet 250of 325P. 2



# M
II-K-(I)-6 3
FUE L PRIC E FORECAS T COMPARISO N - ACI D RAI N

STUDYVERSU S MEFS . EEA , Inc . Jul y 8 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-6 3
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Averox Inc. formerly Flickering
Star Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald W. Quealy, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 9, 2006



                                        By: /s/ GERALD W. QUEALY
                                            ___________________________
                                                Gerald W. Quealy
                                                Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification ofQuarterly Report**

 

I, Gerald McMahon, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of NeoRx Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350 that:

 

a.               theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

b.              theinformation contained in the Report 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | August 9,  2004 | By:             | /s/ GERALD  MCMAHON |   |
|--------|-----------------|-----------------|---------------------|--------|
|   |            | Gerald  McMahon |

 

----
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00295-CR

IN RE MARCUS PILKINGTON

Original Proceeding

CONCURRING OPINION

At the hearing before the trial court various arguments were made. Some of the 

arguments made by various attorneys are set out below. The arguments have to do with 

the legal effect of a document, which is being referred to as a “reindictment” apparently 

to distinguish it from the original “indictment.” Both the indictment and the 

reindictment were filed in the same trial court cause number. 

Attorney One: “...the caption of the two indictments run under the same 

cause number that’s been assigned by the district clerk. These are two 

independently returned indictments, Your Honor. The State has never 

moved to amend the first returned indictment at all...It is still an active, 

validly returned indictment...The same can be said for the second returned 

indictment.”

Attorney One: “Again, there has been no amendment of either indictment 

on this—in this case,...”
In re Pilkington Page 2

Attorney Two: “Our opinion on that is it [the reindictment] replaces 

completely the old indictment. The old indictment ceases to exist.

Attorney Three: “The other indictment ceases to exist.”

Attorney Two: “We’re proceeding on the riot [reindictment]. That’s our 

election at that point.”

The problem is that all these arguments were being made by the same party, the 

State, and the arguments are clearly inconsistent. One attorney is arguing that there are 

two valid and subsisting indictments against the defendant now pending in the same 

case number. The other attorneys for the State are arguing that the second indictment 

replaced the first indictment. This causes me to agree with a summary from the 

defendant’s brief:

“This is a debacle wholly of the State’s creation.”

It seems like there is an easy fix. The easy fix seems to be first, call it what it is, an 

indictment, and second, file the so called “reindictment” in a new cause number. There 

are consequences that follow an additional indictment versus an amended indictment. I 

have found nothing that authorizes or prohibits the filing of two indictments in the same 

trial court case number, but it is certainly going to be confusing as it moves forward to 

identify to which of the indictments any post-indictment procedures and protections, 

motions, hearings, etc. apply if the parties even on one side cannot agree whether there 

is one or two indictments pending in this case.
In re Pilkington Page 3

But even an easy fix does not give us the authority to compel it by mandamus. I 

concur in the Court’s denial of the petition for a writ of mandamus.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Concurring opinion delivered and filed November 7, 2018
# L_2004209EN.01000801.xml

| 11.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 209/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/8

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1091/2004

of 10 June 2004

amending Regulation (EC) No 549/2000 on the rice intervention centres

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the general rules of the common market organisation in rice as stipulated in Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 (1), and in particular Article 8,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 549/2000 (2), determining the rice intervention centres should contain the indication of rice intervention centres of Hungary, as the only rice producer of the new Member States that joined the European Union on 1 May 2004. The concerned indication should include the Hungarian rice intervention centres for the implementation of the intervention as from 10 May 2004, pursuant with Commission Regulation (EC) No 708/98 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 549/2000 (2), determining the rice intervention centres should contain the indication of rice intervention centres of Hungary, as the only rice producer of the new Member States that joined the European Union on 1 May 2004. The concerned indication should include the Hungarian rice intervention centres for the implementation of the intervention as from 10 May 2004, pursuant with Commission Regulation (EC) No 708/98 (3).

| (2) | Hungary has named two rice intervention centres for intervention in the rice market. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Hungary has named two rice intervention centres for intervention in the rice market.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex of Commission Regulation (EC) No 549/2000, determining the rice producing regions and intervention centres is amended as follows:

Hungary is to be added as item 6, as follows:

| ‘6. HUNGARY |
| --- |
| Region | Intervention centre |
| Northern Great Plain | Karcag |
| Southern Great Plain | Szarvas’ |

‘6. HUNGARY

Region

Intervention centre

Northern Great Plain

Karcag

Southern Great Plain

Szarvas’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 10 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18. Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/2002 (OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 27).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 67, 15.3.2000, p. 14.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 98, 31.3.1998, p. 21. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 579/2004 (OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 54).

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001096781
<NAME> E-XACT TRANSACTIONS LTD
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,603
<PP&E>                                         294,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          429,973
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,502
<OTHER-SE>                                    (84,965)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,510
<SALES>                                        184,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,719
<CGS>                                           87,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,771,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (102,245)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,574,772)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (58,724)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,516,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,516,048)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60434

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY E. FOLEY, 

also known as Sealed Defendant 1,

doing business as Kountry Tyme Sports Foundation,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:97-CR-8-ALL-WS

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Larry E. Foley appeals his sentence from his guilty-plea

convictions for wire fraud and aiding and abetting arguing that

the district court erred in determining the amount of loss

attributable to him under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(1). Our review of

the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no

reversible error was committed. The district court’s 
No. 98-60434

- 2 -

calculation of intended loss was not error. See United States v.

Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 396 (5th Cir. 1996). Foley’s assertion

that the district court erred in departing upward was not

adequately briefed and is thus deemed waived on appeal. See

United States v. Valdiosera-Godinez, 932 F.2d 1093, 1099 (5th

Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interlock Services, Inc.
d/b/a New York International Commerce Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Myron W. Landin, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 that to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:  March 6, 2003                       /s/  Myron W. Landin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:    Myron W. Landin
                                           Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlantic BancGroup, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David L. Young,
Principal Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
            results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
            covered by the Report.

Date:  March 16, 2006            By:   /s/ David L. Young
       --------------               ----------------------------------------
                                     David L. Young, Principal Financial
                                     Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Case 19-18813-RAM Doc 4 Filed 06/29/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-18813-RAM Doc 4 Filed 06/29/19 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9696]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 1, 2009.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-9696 Filed 4-24-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism. Initial Review Group Clinical, Treatment and Health 
Services. Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: June 1-2, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 
Military Road NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 2019, Rockville, MD 
20852. 301-443-4032. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9af1fbeee8f3f4fbdaf7fbf3f6b4f4f3f2b4fdf5ec"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c272d383e25222d0c212d252062222524622b233a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 21, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-9666 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1                     5132644.7       7243166.12                0       940322008.94
A10                     64055.95                0                0           10981019
A11                     75596.78                0                0           12959450
A12                     38109.75                0                0            6533100
A13                    106234.03                0                0           18211550
A14                    741319.46                0                0          142333331
A15                    950933.12        703325.91                0       174853556.66
A16                       113750                0                0           21000000
A2                   10947347.73      18316729.98                0       2002732081.9
A3                     834366.96                0                0          154036974
A4                      703325.9        -703325.9                0       130548106.34
A5                    2547182.96                0                0          470249157
A6                     369855.29       1213201.01                0        67067777.63
A7                     947916.69                0                0          175000000
A8                    1134413.45       2802322.27                0       206627855.21
A9                     131142.38                0                0           22481550
APO                            0         22439.79                0        10169582.13
AR                        317.93              100                0                  0
B1                     609091.56         94752.36                0       112352920.15
B2                      185405.3         28842.27                0        34199827.02
B3                         79427         12355.93                0         14651088.7
B4                      79464.82         12361.81                0        14658065.41
B5                      45008.63           7001.7                0         8302283.58
B6                      60927.01          5365.74          4112.27        11238584.96


</TABLE>