alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2985 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2985

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ethene, tetrafluoro, 
  oxidized, polymerized reduced, methyl esters, reduced, ethoxylated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ethene, tetrafluoro, 
  oxidized, polymerized reduced, methyl esters, reduced, ethoxylated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHENE, TETRAFLUORO, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED REDUCED, METHYL 
              ESTERS, REDUCED, ETHOXYLATED.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.17 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ethene, tetrafluoro, 
oxidized, polymerized reduced, methyl esters, reduced, ethoxylated) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 4

Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-4 Filed 07/19/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-4 Filed 07/19/19 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

www.flsb.uscourts.gov 

MERIDIAN MARINA & YACHT CLUB 

OF PALM CITY, LLC 

CASE NO.: 19-18585-MAM 

Chapter 11 

Debtor. 

_____________ / 

BALLOT AND DEADLINE FOR FILING BALLOT ACCEPTING OR REJECTING PLAN 

TO HAVE YOUR VOTE COUNT YOU MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS BALLOT BY THE 

DEADLINE IND/CA TED BELOW [AS SET PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 3018-1 (B)] 

The plan filed by Meridian Marina & Yacht Club of Palm City. LLC on July 27. 2020 can be confirmed 

by the court and thereby made binding on you if it is accepted by the holders of two-thirds in amount and 

more than one-half in number of claims in each class and the holders of two-thirds in amount of equity 

security interests in each class voting on the plan. In the event the requisite acceptances are not obtained, 

the court may nevertheless confirm the plan if the court finds that the plan accords fair and equitable 

treatment to the class rejecting it. 

This ballot is for creditor (insert name) ______________________ for 

th e f, o II owmg t ype o f c I aim . p,ace I d m . th em . d. ,ca t e d cassm I em ,ca e . th . d. t d amoun: 

TYPE OF CLAIM CLASS IN PLAN AMOUNT OF CLAIM 

□ General Secured $ 

□ General Unsecured $ 

□ Bond Holder Amount of Bond/debenture $ 

□ Equity Security Holder Number of Shares of Stock 

The undersigned [Check One Box] D Accepts D Rejects 

the plan for reorganization of the above-named debtor. 

Signed: 

Print Name: 

Address: 

Phone: 

Date: 

***FILE THIS BALLOT ON OR BEFORE September 8, 2020 *** 

with: Clerk of Bankruptcy Court 

□ 301 N. Miami Ave., Room 150, Miami, FL 33128 

□ 299 E. Broward Blvd., Room 112, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 

~ 1515 North Flagler Drive, Room 801, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

If you have more than one type of claim against this debtor, separate ballots must 

be filed and you should receive a ballot for each type of claim eligible to vote. 

Contact the plan proponent regarding incorrect or insufficient ballot(s). 

LF-33 (rev. 10/10/14) 

Case 19-18585-MAM Doc 156 Filed 08/07/20 Page 1 of 1
# L_2005048EN.01004702.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/47

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 316/2004 of 20 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 laying down certain rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards the description, designation, presentation and protection of certain wine sector products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 55 of 24 February 2004
  )

Throughout the text of the Regulation:

for:

‘representative trade organisation’,

read:

‘representative professional organisation’.

On page 36, in Annex II, under ‘ITALY’, ‘Terms referred to in Article 28’:

for:

‘Inticazione geografica tipica (IGT)’,

read:

‘Indicazione geografica tipica (IGT)’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 77 (Thursday, April 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11713]


Missouri Disaster <greek-i> MO-00035; Declaration of Economic 
Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Missouri, dated 04/16/2009.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm System.
    Incident Period: 01/26/2009 Through 01/28/2009.
    Effective Date: 04/16/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/19/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Butler, Douglas, Dunklin, Mississippi, Oregon, 
Pemiscot, Shannon, Stoddard, Stone.
Contiguous Counties:
    Missouri: Barry, Bollinger, Cape Girardeau, Carter, Christian, 
Dent, Howell, Lawrence, New Madrid, Ozark, Reynolds, Ripley, Scott, 
Taney, Texas, Wayne, Webster, Wright.
    Arkansas: Carroll, Clay, Craighead, Fulton, Greene, Mississippi, 
Randolph, Sharp.
    Illinois: Alexander.
    Kentucky: Ballard, Carlisle, Fulton, Hickman.
    Tennessee: Dyer, Lake.

    The Interest Rate is: 4.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 117130.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
Missouri, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: April 16, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-9312 Filed 4-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# L_2016289EN.01002101.xml

| 25.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 289/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 289/21

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 124 of 27 April 2004
  )

On page 22, Annex I, point (58) (concerning Article 59(2)):

for:

‘2.   If, over a period of 12 months, an official is absent for up to three days because of sickness for a total of more than 12 days, ...’,

read:

‘2.   If, over a period of 12 months, an official is absent without a medical certificate for up to three days because of sickness for a total of more than 12 days, ...’.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.
("the Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jack B. Binion, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                    By: /s/ Jack B. Binion
                                       ------------------------------------
                                    Jack B. Binion, Chief Executive Officer
                                    March 17, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000755872
<NAME>                        KFP 85-LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         194,748
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  49,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (39,050)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         5,546,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,156,883)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,813,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        4,420,189
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,813,861
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               448,966
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               288,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             231,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (71,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (71,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (71,216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (8.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (8.79)
<FN>
NOTE: TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS AND TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE
BECAUSE REGISTRANT DOES NOT PRESENT A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1- Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Balance at
                                                 Beginning of   Charged to Costs and                   Balance at End of
                                                    Period            Expenses          Deductions           Period
                                                    ------            --------          ----------           ------
<S>                                                <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1997:
 Provision for doubtful accounts ..............      $2,499            $10,880               $679            $12,700
                                                    =======           ========            =======           ========

For the year ended December 31, 1998:
 Provisions for doubtful accounts .............     $12,700           $208,604            $96,304           $125,000
                                                    =======           ========            =======           ========

For the year ended December 31, 1999:
 Provisions for doubtful accounts .............    $125,000           $606,932           $157,056           $574,876
                                                   ========           ========           ========           ========
</TABLE>
PRECEDENTIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

Nos. 09-3388, 09-3389

_____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

VINCENT J. FUMO,

 Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 

_____________

No. 09-3390

_____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellant,

v.
RUTH ARNAO,

Appellee.

_____________

On Appeal from the District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(No. 06-CR-00319)

District Judge: Honorable Ronald L. Buckwalter

Argued May 25, 2011

Before: FUENTES, GARTH, NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion Filed: August 23, 2011)

Zane David Memeger, Esq.

Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq. [ARGUED]

John J. Pease, Esq.

Office of United States Attorney

615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250

Philadelphia, PA 19106

Counsel for Appellant/Cross-Appellee

Samuel J. Buffone, Esq. [ARGUED]

BuckleySandler LLP

1250 24th Street NW, Suite 700

Washington, D.C. 20037

Peter Goldberger, Esq.

50 Rittenhouse Place
Ardmore, PA 19003

Counsel for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Fumo

Patrick J. Egan, Esq. [ARGUED]

Eric E. Reed, Esq.

Fox Rothschild LLP

2000 Market Street, 10th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Counsel for Appellee Arnao

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

FUENTES, Circuit Judge

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion filed on 

August 23, 2011 shall be amended. A new footnote #12 will 

be inserted on page number 59 at the end of the second 

paragraph under Section A. The text of the footnote is as 

follows:

Arnao also joins in Fumo’s arguments opposing the 

Government’s contention that the District Court erred in 

failing to apply a 2-level sophisticated means enhancement 

with regard to the Citizens Alliance fraud. Because we find 

that the District Court abused its discretion in ruling that the 
Citizens Alliance fraud did not involve the use of 

sophisticated means, the same finding of abuse of discretion 

applies in Arnao’s sentence. Accordingly, the 2b1.1(b)(9)(C) 

additional enhancement of 2 levels applies in the Guideline 

calculation for Arnao as well as Fumo.

The numbering of all subsequent footnotes shall be adjusted 

accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that the 

opinion shall be amended to delete the next to last sentence in 

Section A on page 59 that reads “Because these revised 

calculations create a loss that is greater than $1,000,000, 

Arnao will receive a 2-level increase in her base offense level 

under § 2B1.1(b)(I)” , and replace it with the following 

sentence:

“Because these revised calculations create a loss that is 

greater than $1 million, Arnao will receive an additional 2-

level increase (thereby totaling 16 levels) in her base offense 

level under §2B1.1(b)(I).”

By the Court,

/s/ Julio M. Fuentes

Circuit Judge
DATED: September 15, 2011

tmk/cc: Peter Goldberger, Esq.

 Dennis J. Cogan, Esq.

 Samuel J. Buffone, Esq.

 Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq.

 John J. Pease, III, Esq.

 Edwin J. Jacobs, Jr., Esq.

Stephen F. Funk, Esq.

 Patrick J. Egan, Esq.
Memorandum of Agreement by and between the Company and Neil A. Currie



 Exhibit 10.1 

 
 



 
 Memorandum 
  

			
	Date:	  	February 21, 2012
		
	To:	  	Neill Currie, Chief Executive Officer
		
	From:	  	Peter Durhager, Chief Administrative Officer
		
	Re:	  	Corporate Airplane Utilization

 Reference is made to your employment agreement with RenaissanceRe Holdings, Ltd.
(the “Company”), dated February 9, 2009, as amended (your “Employment Agreement”), and that certain Agreement Regarding Use of Aircraft Interest between you and the Company dated
November 17, 2009 (the “Aircraft Use Agreement”). Consistent with our discussions, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in your Employment Agreement, including without limitation Section 5(b) thereof,
the Aircraft Use Agreement, or in any other arrangement or policy of the Company, whether or not written, as of and following the date hereof you shall not be entitled to any Company-funded personal use of the Company’s aircraft other than the
twenty-four round trips per year in respect of your business commute as previously agreed between you and the Company. The Aircraft Use Agreement is hereby amended to provide that only such business commute shall be included in the Cap (as defined
therein). To the extent that you wish to use the Company’s aircraft in addition to such business commute, you agree to pay for such use in advance of any such trip, in accordance with Section 2 of the Aircraft Use Agreement, at the fully
loaded variable rate (which rate represents the Company’s “aggregate incremental cost” of such use within the meaning of Regulation S-K and the rules and other guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission). Except as
specifically set forth herein, all terms and provisions of your Employment Agreement and the Aircraft Use Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 
 Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of the terms of this letter agreement by signing below. 
  

	
	Agreed and accepted:
	
	 /s/ Neill A. Currie

	Neill A. Currie
	
	 February 21, 2012

	Date

 RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. 

 
  
 Renaissance House, 12 Crow Lane, Pembroke HM 19, Bermuda 
 Phone: 441-295-4513 Fax:
441-292-9453 www.renre.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,925)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (350)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)


</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 10

- 363 V

Filed: May 3, 2013

Not for Publication

*************************************

LARRY STOELZING, *

*

Petitioner, * Attorneys’ Fees & Costs Decision

v. * Based on Stipulation of Fact

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Ronald C. Homer

, Boston, MA, for petitioner.

Lara A. Englund , Washington, DC , for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On May 2 , 2013 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 requirement, petitioner ’s counsel asserts that

petitioner did not incur any costs in pursuit of h is petition

.

P etitioner filed an Application for Attorneys’ Fees and C osts on April 10, 2013 . During

informal discussions, respondent raised objections to certain items. Based on these objections,

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master's action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims's website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special master s will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of priva cy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

petitioner now amends h is request for attorneys’ fees and costs and requests $ 38,5 00.0 0 in

attorneys’ fees and costs. Respondent does not object to the reduced amount. The undersigned

finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $ 38,5 00.0 0

, representing

rei mbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable

jointly to petitioner and Conway, Homer & Chin

- Caplan, P.C

. in the amount of $38,500.0 0

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 3, 2013 /s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.