alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3100

   To suspend temporarily the duty on [2,2'-bi-1H-indole]-3,3'-diol, 
                         potassium sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on [2,2'-bi-1H-indole]-3,3'-diol, 
                         potassium sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. [2,2'-BI-1H-INDOLE]-3,3'-DIOL, POTASSIUM SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      [2,2'-Bi-1H-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        indole]-3,3'-                                                      31/2015.......
                        diol, potassium
                        sodium salt
                        (1:?:?) (CAS No.
                        207692-02-2)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3204.15.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2004341EN.01002301.xml

| 17.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/23

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 26 July 2004

appointing a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2004/768/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 January 2002 the Council adopted Decision 2002/60/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (1).

| (2) | A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Ole VON BEUST, notified to the Council on 7 July 2004, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A seat as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Ole VON BEUST, notified to the Council on 7 July 2004,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Mr Roger KUSCH, Justizsenator, is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr Ole VON BEUST for the remainder of his term of office, which runs until 25 January 2006.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2004.

For the Council

The President

B. R. BOT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

1

---
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 25, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-2189

Lower Tribunal No. 13-3741

________________

Alberto Soler,

Appellant,

vs.

Ally Bank, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M.

Rodriguez, Judge.

Alberto Soler, in proper person.

Kelley Kronenberg, and David E. Hicks (Tampa), for appellee Ally Bank.

Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, and SALTER, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, J.

Alberto Soler appeals from a final order denying as untimely filed his
motion for relief from judgment filed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure

1.540(b)(1). As the record before this Court demonstrates that the motion was

timely filed, we reverse the order under review and remand for the trial court to

address the motion on its merits.

Reversed and remanded.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 337 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 337

           For the relief of Sali Bregaj and Mjaftime Bregaj.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2011

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           For the relief of Sali Bregaj and Mjaftime Bregaj.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SALI BREGAJ AND MJAFTIME 
              BREGAJ.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Sali Bregaj 
and Mjaftime Bregaj shall each be eligible for issuance of an immigrant 
visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 
for permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Sali Bregaj and Mjaftime Bregaj enter 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), they shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the applications for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed 
with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas or permanent resident status to Sali Bregaj and 
Mjaftime Bregaj, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next following fiscal 
year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to 
natives of Albania under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of Albania under 
section 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(e)).
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Sali Bregaj 
and Mjaftime Bregaj shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**428 TP 11-02331**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF WILFREDO RAMOS, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered November 15, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Entered: April 20, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit
32.2









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Globetech Environmental, Inc. on Form
10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Theodor Hennig,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:









(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and









(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.



















By: /s/ Theodor
Hennig




Theodor
Hennig




Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and Director




(Principal
Financial Officer)




August 8,
2008














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.48


Loan Contract


 


The Loan Contract is made between and by Dalian TOFA New Materials Development Co., Ltd (as “TOFA”) and Mr. Song Yuchun







Mr. Song applies for loan for personal reason. His application has been approved by TOFA board. Two parties hereto agree as follow:








	
1.

	
Mr. Song may borrow from TOFA in tranches, limited to accumulative amounts RMB 10,000,000 only (Say: TEN MILLION)








	
2.

	
Maturity term lasts (1) one year; or (2) one month as of the date TOFA requires for repayment








	
3.

	
TOFA agrees the loan herein is interest free.








	
4.

	
The contract is made in duplicate, one for each, and in full force upon two parties’ signatures and seals.












Dalian TOFA New Materials Development Co., Ltd


Signature: Seal of the corporation in lieu of physical signature








	
Mr. Song Yuchun

	  
	
Signature: /s/ Song Yuchun

	  
	  	  
	
Date: June 22nd 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
          AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, Donald Strickland, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of IPIX Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ Donald Strickland
---------------------
Donald Strickland
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Syngas International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wilf Ouellette, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/Wilf Ouellette



Wilf Ouellette,

Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer

August 18, 2006
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document











 



 
 

Exhibit 10.39    
    


Summary of Unwritten Compensation Arrangements

Applicable to Non-Employee Directors of Overstock.com, Inc.  


        The Company increased its non-employee directors pay to $60,000 annually (from the previous amount of $20,000 annually), at the rate of $15,000 per
quarter. The Company also grants options to non-employee directors, generally at the first Board meeting after the director first joins the Board, and then periodically thereafter. In 2007
the Company granted options to non-employee directors as follows: 



	Name
 
	 	Grant Date
	 	Exercise Price ($)
	 	Number of Options Granted

	Allison Abraham	 	April 20, 2007	 	17.58	 	5,000
	Ray Groves(1)	 	April 20, 2007	 	17.58	 	5,000
	Barclay (Clay) Corbus	 	April 20, 2007	 	17.58	 	15,000
	Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. 	 	August 16, 2007	 	20.00	 	15,000
	James V. Joyce(2)	 	April 20, 2007	 	17.58	 	10,000
	James V. Joyce(2)	 	October 24, 2007	 	34.65	 	30,000






	(1)
	Mr. Groves
resigned from the Company's board of directors on May 24, 2007.



	(2)
	Mr. Joyce
joined the Company's board of directors on January 14, 2008. These options were granted to Mr. Joyce for consulting services he performed prior to
joining the Company's board of directors. 



        The
Company also reimburses directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings. Haverford Valley, L.C., an
affiliate of the Company, and certain affiliated entities which make travel arrangements for our executives, also occasionally make travel arrangements for directors to attend Board meetings, for
which the Company reimburses Haverford Valley at rates not in excess of commercially available airline rates. The following table sets forth information concerning compensation paid or accrued by the
Company to each non-employee member of the board of directors during the year ended December 31, 2007. 



	Name
 
	 	Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash ($)
	 	Option Awards(1) ($)
	 	Total ($)

	Allison H. Abraham	 	$	30,000	 	$	111,787	 	$	141,787
	Clay Corbus	 	$	25,000	 	$	31,462	 	$	56,462
	Joseph Tabacco	 	$	20,000	 	$	17,594	 	$	37,594
	John A Fisher(2)	 	 	—	 	$	101,236	 	$	101,236
	Ray J. Groves(3)	 	$	10,000	 	$	128,538	 	$	138,538
	Gordon S. Macklin(4)	 	 	—	 	$	101,594	 	$	101,594






	(1)
	Reflects
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 in accordance with FAS 123(R) and thus
includes amounts from awards granted in and prior to 2007. At December 31, 2007, the number of options held by each non-employee director was as follows: Ms. Abraham: 30,000;
Mr. Corbus: 15,000; and Mr. Tobacco: 15,000.



	(2)
	Mr. Fisher
resigned from the Board on February 23, 2007.



	(3)
	Mr. Groves
resigned from the Board on May 24, 2007.



	(4)
	Mr. Macklin
passed away on January 30, 2007. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.39
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-5201

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. EUREKA BARNES, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cr-01297-TLW-1)

Submitted: August 6, 2009 Decided: January 12, 2010

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David B. Betts, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. W. Walter Wilkins, United States Attorney, Carrie A. Fisher, William E. Day, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eureka Barnes pled guilty to one count of making false statements to a Secret Service agent, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (2006). Barnes was sentenced to thirty-six months’ imprisonment, and now appeals. Finding no error, we affirm. We find Barnes’s sentence is not procedurally unreasonable. In sentencing a defendant, a district court must first properly calculate the Guideline range. Gall v. United

States , 552 U.S. 38, ___, 128 S. Ct. 586, 596 (2007). When reviewing the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines, this court reviews findings of fact for clear error and questions of law de novo. United States v. Osborne, 514 F.3d 377, 387 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 128 S. Ct. 2525 (2008). Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court followed the necessary procedural steps in sentencing Barnes, and properly calculated the applicable Guideline range. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Globetech  Environmental,
Inc.  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2005,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
Alexander,  Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By: /s/ David Alexander
David Alexander

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director

(Principal Financial Officer)

August 15, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Cnii

p JiIWILISAMA11.,\R(IIYNWI(I(IIIICLI1KOI:IIIICUIRF (213)712-3451) SOSFWI.S

Ihcclcrk51h.Icourtsgov DAVIO

L. 131111) UPS Moipy FI{ANUIS

GAYIJ 111MM DOIJUIAS

S. LAN(I

BUSINLSSADMINISIRAOIR hII/AIlrIII LANG-MIIRS

(214)712-3434 RIHII
Zr NI. Pu

I MImP
gayIchumpaW5LlIIcourIs.gov LSA MINIS

Court

at appeat- fifth Thtrirt

at cxi

at aLLas

(214 745-W3 AIJ BROWN-- CRAft; SIOIIUARU
óOOCcmIMIkcI S[RIrI. SI:1FE200

INIl_IINUF Hill. WIIIII.IIII

I.

DAI.I As,TPXAS 752(12 WWW.jXCOIIRIS(IOV/5IIICOA.ASPX DAVID

J. SN

II NCR

(214)712-34(10 November

30, 2015 Jeffrey

L. Hebert TDCJ No. 1082948 Polunsky Unit 3872 FM 350 South Livingston.

Tx. 7735! RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05-02-00208-CR Trial Court Case Number:

FO 1-251 54-HN Style: Hebert, Jeffrey Lee v. The Stale of Texas I. The case has been submitted
and
is pending consideration. 2. The Court
of Criminal Appeals
has jurisdiction
over post-conviction

writs and habeas corpus. Please contact
the Court
of Criminal Appeals

for any forms
or information. 3. The Court has no record
of an appeal
on file in the above referenced name
or trial court number. 4. Enclosed

is a copy of the opinion

in your appeal. 5. This Court does not appoint counsel 6. Neither
the judges nor the staff of this Court can give legal advice. Therefore,
you may wish

to conEact your attorney;

the trial court;

or the State Counsel

for Offenders, Texas Department

of Criminal Justice, P.O. Box 4005, Huntsville,
TX, 77342 for further information

or assistance.7.TheCourtdoesnothavejurisdictiontocompelfreecopiesofanyofyourtrialcourtrecords.copiesofanydocumentswithoutprepaymentofpayableinadvancebycashier’scheckormoney______8.Yourcasehasbeensetforsubmissionon9.OurrecordsreflectthatthethetrialcourttoprovideyouwithThisCourtdoesnotprovidefreecosts.OurchargeisS.10perpageorder.x10.Enclosedpleasefindthecopiesyourequested.(enclosedareIvolumeclerkrecord,and6volumesreporterrecordsasrequestedandpaidfor)II.ThecostforthecopiesyourequestedisRespectfUlly,Is!LisaMatz,ClerkoftheCourt2