alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.17

DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN OF ROME BANCORP, INC.(Amended and Restated
Effective as of December 21, 2005)

AMENDMENT

Pursuant to
Section 8.1 of the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan of Rome Bancorp, Inc.,
as Amended and Restated Effective December 21, 2005 (the Plan), the Plan is
hereby amended, effective immediately prior to the Effective Time, as defined
in the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc
and Rome Bancorp, Inc. by adding the following Section 8.4 to the Plan, as
follows:

The Company
terminates the Plan immediately prior to the Effective Time as defined in the
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc and
the Company. The Company shall direct the trustee of the trust under the Plan
to pay each Participant in the Plan any and all amounts due thereunder in a
lump sum, on the Effective Time in accordance with Section 409A of the Code.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment has been signed by an officer of Rome Bancorp, Inc. thereunto duly
authorized.

| |                                  |  | 
| | -------------------------------- |  | 
| | ROME BANCORP, INC.              
| |                                 
| | By: /s/ Charles M. Sprock       
| |                                  |  | 
| | Name: Charles
 M. Sprock,       
| | Title:
 Chairman President & CEO
| |                                 
| | Date: February 23,
 2011        

---
EX-10.26



  

			
	 




	    	Exhibit No. 10.26

 [DATE] 
 [NAME] 
 [TITLE] 
 Subject: Inducement Long Term Incentive Awards 
 Dear [NAME]: 

This letter is to inform you that Armstrong’s Management Development and Compensation Committee granted you the following long-term incentive equity
grant effective [DATE]: 
              Stock Options

              Restricted Stock Units 

The award is subject to the terms of the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan and this grant letter. 
 Stock Options 
 Each Stock Option entitles you to purchase one share of AWI common stock at
an exercise price equal to $    .    , the New York Stock Exchange closing price of AWI stock on [DATE]. You may pay the option exercise price in cash or by delivering shares of AWI stock you
have owned for at least six months. 
 The options are non-qualified and have a ten-year term starting [DATE OF GRANT];
             shares will vest on [FIRST ANNIVERSARY DATE];              shares will vest on [SECOND ANNIVERSARY
DATE];              shares will vest on [THIRD ANNIVERSARY DATE]. 

Restricted Stock Units 
 The restrictions
will lapse in three installments at one, two and three years following the grant:              shares on [FIRST ANNIVERSARY DATE];
             shares on [SECOND ANNIVERSARY DATE];; and              shares on [THIRD ANNIVERSARY DATE]. The
Management Development and Compensation Committee may settle the restricted stock units in cash if insufficient shares are available at the end of the restriction periods. 
 The company will use share tax withholding to satisfy your tax obligations unless you provide a payment to cover the taxes. 
 If the company makes cash dividend payments during the restriction period, the value of the dividends will accrue in a non-interest bearing account. You will receive a cash payment for the accrued
dividends at the end of the restriction period. 
 Employment Events 
 The following chart outlines the provisions which apply to the grant for various employment events. 
  

					
	 Event
	  	 Stock Option Provisions
	  	 Restricted Stock Unit Provisions

	 Voluntary resignation
	  	 •   Forfeit vested and unvested options
	  	 •   Forfeit unvested units and accrued dividends









 Employment Events (continued) 

 

					
	 Event
	  	 Stock Option Provisions
	  	 Restricted Stock Unit Provisions

			
	 Retirement
	  	 •    Forfeit unvested options

•    5 years to exercise vested options (not to exceed original term)
	  	 •    Forfeit unvested units and accrued dividends

			
	 Involuntary termination
	  	 •    Forfeit vested and unvested options
	  	 •    Forfeit unvested units and accrued dividends

			
	 Death
	  	 •    Accelerated vesting

•    3 years to exercise vested options (not to exceed original term)
	  	 •    Accelerated vesting

			
	 Long-Term disability
	  	 •    Accelerated vesting

•    3 years to exercise vested options (not to exceed original term)
	  	 •    Accelerated vesting


 Please contact Eileen Beck (ext. 4050) if you have questions. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	Matthew J. Espe
	Chief Executive Officer


 Enclosure 
   2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan 

  
 2
p. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart

Document

Number: 

# 104 ) IV-C-7

0 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 104 of 232P. 2

/__ \ 

### s r

### SL \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO NAGENC Y WASHINGTON

, D.C . 2046 0 FF B ! 6 198

8

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N
Honorabl e Jame s A . Courte r Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D . C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Courter : Thank yo u fo r you r lette r o f February1 , 1988 , expressing you r view s o n EPA' s propose d regulation s t o contro l vapor s generate d during the refueling o f moto r vehicle s b yth e us e o f onboar d canisters . Thi s proposa l involve s comple x an d controversia l issues , an d w e hav e spen t a grea t dea l o f time analyzing th e environ

menta l an

d economi c impacts . W e hel d a publi c hearing o n th e proposa l thi s pas t October , an d w e expec t t o receiv e man y additiona l comment s b ythe time the commen t perio d close s o n February11 , 1988 . Acop yo f you r lette r wil l be place d i n th e publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking , an d we d o than

k yo u fo r takin

g the tim

e t o commen t on thi s importan t issue .

Sincerel yyours ,
Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s j/cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000754813
<NAME>                        MICROFRAME, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                             386,385
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                    2,003,131
<ALLOWANCES>                      (100,000)
<INVENTORY>                      1,086,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 3,899,576
<PP&E>                           1,154,527
<DEPRECIATION>                    (839,013)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   4,640,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           (1,253,002)
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                             4,839
<OTHER-SE>                       3,018,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     4,640,594
<SALES>                          4,018,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                24,018,273
<CGS>                           11,787,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   24,108,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (6,567)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (83,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (7,720)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (75,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        75,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.01)
        
                                  

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Medizone International, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Edwin G. Marshall, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edwin G. Marshall Edwin G. Marshall, Principal Executive Officer  Date: June 30, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ACCEPTED

04-14-00734-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/16/2015 1:18:01 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 03/16/2015 1:18:01 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2910 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2910

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fuel injection pumps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fuel injection pumps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUEL INJECTION PUMPS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Fuel injection      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        pumps for                                                          31/2015.......
                        compression-
                        ignition engines,
                        each weighing 60
                        kg or more and
                        functional in a
                        common rail fuel
                        system with a
                        pressure greater
                        than 1200 bar
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8413.30.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# r--6--6f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0237 MATTHEW "MATT" OLDS,

Plaint iff, Appellee and Cross Appellant, v. MARK HUELSKAMP,

Defendant and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

Th is appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Shane Alexander**  **MacIntyre,** whose name appears next on th e list of

attorneys desiring appo int me nt as mediators fo r Money J udgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to conduct the mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time peri ods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5 )(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s June 6, 2022.

Bow en Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Scott M. Stearns, Zachary A aron Franz, Carey

Schmidt, David C. Berkoff, Shane Alexander MacInt yr e 06/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0237
SUITE 1850

1066 WEST HASTINGS STREET

VANCOUVER, BC V6E 3X2



|T: 604.683.3850
        F: 604.688.8479 | ACAL GROUP
        CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS
        PCAOB & CPAB Registrant
|--------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



AUDITORS’CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation of our
report dated June 28, 2011, (except as to Note 16 which is as of May 10, 2012), with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Linux Gold Corp. as of February 28, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 on amended Form 20-F dated
May 11, 2012.



“ACAL Group”

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, British Columbia

Date: July
5, 2012
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Digital Learning Management Corporation
        (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
        hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 Dated:
                  April 19, 2006
              By:/s/
                  Umesh PatelUmesh
                  PatelChairman,
                  President and Chief Financial Officer
exhibit 23

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                              330 E. Warm Springs
                                              Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                     702.528.1984
                                               702.362.0540 (fax)





July 16, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

I  have issued my report dated January 17, 2002, accompanying the
financial statements of FreePCSQuote.com, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the period of February 18, 1999 (inception date) through December
31, 2000.  I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference  of
said  report  in the Annual Report of FreePCSQuote.com,  Inc.  on
Form 10-KSB (File No. 000-26293).

Signed,

/s/ Brad Beckstead

G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0578 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0578

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 578/2004 of 26 March 2004 suspending the buying-in of butter in certain Member States **

*
Official Journal L 090 , 27/03/2004 P. 0053 - 0053 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 578/2004

of 26 March 2004

suspending the buying-in of butter in certain Member States

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 of 16 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream(2), and in particular Article 2 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 lays down that buying-in by invitation to tender is to be opened or suspended by the Commission in a Member State, as appropriate, once it is observed that, for two weeks in succession, the market price in that Member State is below or equal to or above 92 % of the intervention price.

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 518/2004(3) establishes the most recent list of Member States in which intervention is suspended. This list must be adjusted as a result of the market prices communicated by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999. In the interests of clarity, the list in question should be replaced and Regulation (EC) No 518/2004 should be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Buying-in of butter by invitation to tender as provided for in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 is hereby suspended in Belgium, Denmark, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria and Finland.

Article 2

Regulation (EC) No 518/2004 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 March 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2) OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 359/2003 (OJ L 53, 28.2.2003, p. 17).

(3) OJ L 63, 28.2.2004, p. 9.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-82784, 333-38002, 333-49668, 333-91429, 333-96183, 333-103010, 333-107045, 333-113927, 333-116761, 333-125398, and 333-126585 on Form S-8; and Registration Statement No. 333-63596 on Form S-4 of ourreports dated February 22, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Quest Software, Inc. (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109* in 2007 and the adoption of FASBStatement No. 123(R),*Share-Based Payment*, and FASB Staff Position No. AUG AIR-1,*Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities* in 2006) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting(which report expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Costa Mesa, California 

February 22, 2008
EXHIBIT
23





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No.’s
333-136894, 333-136893, 333-136891, 333-114513, 333-88798 and 333-64056) on Form
S-8 of iSECUREtrac Corp. of our report dated March 24, 2009, relating to our
audit of the consolidated financial statements which appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, of iSECUREtrac Corp. for the year ended December 31,
2008.





/s/
      McGladrey & Pullen LLPKansas
      City, MissouriMarch
      24, 2009
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### January 27, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

LAWRENCE HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. GORDON P. GALLAGHER, Judge, Defendant - Appellee. No. 15-1462 (D.C. No. 1:15-CV-02417-LTB) (D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , LUCERO , and McHUGH , Circuit Judges. **
Plaintiff-Appellant Lawrence Harris, appearing pro se, seeks to appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his suit against Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. We deny Mr. Harris’s motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of fees or costs (IFP status) and dismiss the appeal. This appeal began with Mr. Harris’s desire to play semi-professional

*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.basketball for the Tulsa 66ers. He filed suit against the Tulsa 66ers in the federal district court in Colorado. That complaint and action was dismissed without prejudice for improper venue. Harris v. Tulsa 66ers , No. 14-cv-02765, 2014 WL 5356683 (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2014). Mr. Harris then filed suit against the district court because he disagreed with the order of dismissal. The magistrate judge directed Mr. Harris to pay the filing fee or file an IFP motion and a complaint that complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 on a court-approved form. The district court ultimately dismissed that complaint and action without prejudice for failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s directives pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Harris v. United States District Court , No. 14-cv-03153, 2015 WL 109823 (D. Colo. Jan. 5, 2015). The present action involves Mr. Harris suing the magistrate judge. Mr. Harris was granted IFP status, and the district court screened his complaint and dismissed it with prejudice for failure to state a claim and as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (ii). Harris v. Gallagher , No. 15-cv-02417 (D. Colo. Nov. 16, 2015). This suit is barred by absolute judicial immunity. Pierson v. Ray , 386 U.S. 547, 554 (1967). Judges are immune from 42 U.S.C. § 1983 liability unless the judge acts “in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.” Stump v. Sparkman , 435 U.S. 349, 357 (1978). Mr. Harris has not made a rational argument on the law or the facts to warrant this appeal proceeding further. See Henriksen v. Bentley , 644 F.2d 852, 854 (10th Cir. 1981).

- 2 -We DENY the motion for IFP status on appeal and DISMISS the appeal. We remind Mr. Harris that he “remains liable for the full amount of the filing fee.” Brown v. Eppler , 725 F.3d 1221, 1231 (10th Cir. 2013).

Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge

- 3 -