alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

Order 

July 1, 2020

160658

160660

TAXPAYERS FOR MICHIGAN

CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, STEVE

DUCHANE, RANDALL BLUM, and SARA

KANDEL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 160658

COA: 334663

STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF

TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET, and OFFICE OF AUDITOR GENERAL,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

TAXPAYERS FOR MICHIGAN

CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, STEVE

DUCHANE, RANDALL BLUM, and SARA

KANDEL,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 160660

COA: 334663

STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF

TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND

BUDGET, and OFFICE OF AUDITOR GENERAL,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the October 29, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered, and they are GRANTED. The parties 

shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the defendants violated Const 

1963, art 9, §§ 25 and 30, by classifying monies paid to school districts pursuant to Proposal 

A, Const 1963, art 9, § 11, as state spending in the form of aid paid to units of local 

government; (2) whether the defendants violated Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25 and 30, by 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 1, 2020

p0624

2

Clerk

classifying monies paid to public school academies (a.k.a. charter schools) as state 

spending in the form of aid paid to units of local government; (3) whether the Court of 

Appeals erred when it held that state funds directed to local governments to satisfy state 

obligations under Const 1963, art 9, § 29 may not be counted toward the proportion of state 

funds required by Const 1963, art 9, § 30; and (4) whether the Court of Appeals erred to 

the extent that it held that the Auditor General or the Office of the Auditor General is 

subject to mandamus relief.

The Michigan Municipal League, the Government Law Section of the State Bar of 

Michigan, the Michigan Townships Association, the Michigan Association of Counties, 

and Taxpayers United Michigan Foundation are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other 

persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may 

move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 339 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 339

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
special rule for contributions of qualified conservation contributions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2011

Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
special rule for contributions of qualified conservation contributions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Heritage Conservation 
Extension Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULE FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF QUALIFIED CONSERVATION 
              CONTRIBUTIONS MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Individuals.--Subparagraph (E) of section 170(b)(1) of 
        the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to contributions of 
        qualified conservation contributions) is amended by striking 
        clause (vi).
            (2) Corporations.--Subparagraph (B) of section 170(b)(2) of 
        such Code (relating to qualified conservation contributions) is 
        amended by striking clause (iii).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to contributions made in taxable years beginning after December 
31, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form  SB-2  No.  333-116654)  of  Payment  Data  Systems,  Inc.;  (Form S-8 No.
333-122312)  pertaining  to the Amended and Restated 1999 Employee Comprehensive
Stock Plan of Payment Data Systems, Inc. and the 1999 Non-Employee Director Plan
of  Payment  Data  Systems, Inc.; and (Form S-8 No. 333-30958) pertaining to the
Employee  Stock  Purchase Plan of Payment Data Systems, Inc. of our report dated
February 17, 2006, except for Note 15, to which the date is March 10, 2006, with
respect  to  the consolidated financial statements of Payment Data Systems, Inc.
included  in  the  Annual  Report  (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,
2005.


/s/  Akin,  Doherty,  Klein  &  Feuge,  P.C.
AKIN,  DOHERTY,  KLEIN  &  FEUGE,  P.C.
San  Antonio,  Texas
March  31,  2006
Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 60 Filed 04/07/20 Page 1 of 6
Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 60 Filed 04/07/20 Page 2 of 6
Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 60 Filed 04/07/20 Page 3 of 6
Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 60 Filed 04/07/20 Page 4 of 6
Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 60 Filed 04/07/20 Page 5 of 6
Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 60 Filed 04/07/20 Page 6 of 6
exv4w43



 





Exhibit 4.43




Letter of Commitment




To Management Committee of Guangming New District:




     According to the contents of special conference held in the morning on December
14th, 2007 under the auspice of Ye Jiande, the associate director of Management
Committee of Guangming New District, called “Dealing with Remaining Problems after the Relocation
of Flower Field on the Land of Zastron Electronic”, our ministry has got informed that currently,
there are still three flower farmers (with a total area of 110 mu) who have not settled down the
problems of gap of relocation fund with a total amount of RMB 4.84 million. Aiming at this problem,
the board bureau of Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd (Zastron Electronic) convened an
exigent conference this afternoon. Due to limited time, Zastron Electronic agreed to pay
compensation charges, that is RMB 4.84 million (this Fund) before January 20th, 2008,
for the relocation of the flower field in order to better coordinate with the Management Committee
of Guangming New District in dealing with capital problem. As a return, the Management Committee of
Guangming New District must clear up remaining problems of compensation for the relocation of
flower field before December 31st, 2007 and ensure that the Agreement on Transfer of Land-use
Rights in Shenzhen concluded between Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd (Shenzhen Land
No.2007-4150) (Agreement on Transfer of Land-use Rights) and Bureau of State Land in Baoan District
is effectively executed.



Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd




December 18th, 2007
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-3239

_____________________________

DEREK GRIFFIN,

Petitioner,

v.

ANGELA GRIFFIN,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

September 9, 2022

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROWE, C.J., and BILBREY and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Derek Griffin, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.
# L_2004190EN.01002501.xml

| 28.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 190/25

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1038/2004

of 27 May 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 28th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 28th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 49,950 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 May 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 181, 19.7.2003, p. 7. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2126/2003 (OJ L 319, 4.12.2003, p. 4).

2

---
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000479 22-JUL-2016 08:44 AM
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 12, 2006 |  | /s/ M. Todd Holt       
|                    |  | M. Todd Holt           
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
January 14, 2016

Federal Aviation Administration Dear FAA, Thank you for taking the time to review this petiton for a 333 exemption. We are a drone sales, repair, trainer, developer, retailer and wholesaler. We are petitioning for the 333 exemption in order to conduct classes and training on drone design and flight proficiency. We also will be experimenting with locator beacons (transponders) for recovery as well as parachute deployment systems (increased safety). We are the official DJI representative in Texas and use the Phantom Series of Quadcopters and the Inspire Series of Professional Quadcopters. The primary benefits to the public as a whole is an increased emphasis on the safe and appropriate use of drones in recreational and commercial applications, and the development of sUAV’s that facilitate broader safety margins
. Evidenced in media is a general attitude of “non-chalance” amoung UAV operators. Our contributions to the public are the formalization of drone training programs that place high priority on safety when operating UAV’s, both recreationally and commercially. Our work developing safe recovery systems that apply when a UAV malfunctions is another contribution to the public welfare. 

### Summary: KTI Linkedall Drones by DJI are petitioning for an FAA 333 in order to increase public awareness of the need for an emphasis on safe and legal sUAS operations. To facilitate the development of a well-informed public on safe sUAS operations and to develop recovery systems that increase safety margins when UAV’s fail. Thank You, KTI Linkedall Drones by DJI - Samuel Kirkpatrick FAA #3650924 

### KTI Linkedall Drones by DJI - Samuel Kirkpatrick FAA #3650924 10415 – A Westpark Houston, Texas 77042 281.822.9891 samuelk@ktidrones.com
From: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

To: Rich Sewell (rich.sewell@alaska.gov); Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante ; "mvcirr@gmail.com";

"mintovillagecouncil@hotmail.com"

Cc: Adventure@NorthernAlaska.com; Matt Atkinson (matt@northernalaska.com); "Ken R. Leary"; Schlemmer, Kevin

(OST)

Subject: Essential Air Service at Manley and Minto, Alaska - Request for Comments - Due June 4, 2014

Date: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:46:00 AM

All,

Please find attached to this email the proposals of Tatonduk Outfitters Limited d/b/a Everts Air Alaska

(Everts) and Warbelow’s Air Ventures (Warbelow’s) to provide Essential Air Service at Manley and

Minto, Alaska, for a new contract period beginning September 1, 2014. These were the only proposals

received and can also be accessed at www.regulations.gov by searching for docket DOT-OST-2004-

17563. I have briefly summarized the proposals below.

Everts proposes to provide three weekly flights on a Fairbanks-Minto-Manley-Fairbanks routing. Everts

will utilize single-engine, nine-passenger Pilatus PC-12 or Cessna 208 aircraft. For this proposal,

Everts requires an annual subsidy of $84,207.

Warbelow’s (the incumbent) proposes to continue its existing level of service with three weekly flights

on a Fairbanks-Manley-Minto-Fairbanks routing. Warbelow’s will utilize twin-engine, nine-passenger

Piper Navajo Chieftain aircraft. For this proposal, Warbelow’s requests a subsidy of $94,722.

The comments of the communities and the state are a critically important element in our carrierselection decision. We ask that you and any other interested parties carefully review the proposals and

provide us with any comments no later than June 4, 2014. We will docket this email as well as any

comments received. Please feel free to contact myself or the carriers with any questions.

Regards,

A.J.

A.J. Muldoon

Transportation Industry Analyst

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

albert.muldoon@dot.gov

(202) 366-1058
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer of
  Linux Gold Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the
  year ended February 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
  78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  Linux Gold Corp.

Richmond, BC, Canada

|              | by: /s/ John G. Robertson            
|------------- | -------------------------------------
|March 2, 2007 |                                      
|              | John G. Robertson                    
|              | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold
  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---
<PAGE>   1


                              Consent of KPMG LLP                   Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
Telemate.Net Software, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-81443) on Form S-8 of Telemate.Net Software, Inc. of our report dated
February 6, 2001 relating to the balance sheets of Telemate.Net Software, Inc.
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K/A of
Telemate.Net Software, Inc.




/s/ KPMG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
October 8, 2001
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Edward Hebert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.





| |        |                         
| | ------ | ------------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Edward Hebert       
| | Name:  | Edward Hebert           
| | Title: | Vice President  Finance
| | Date:  | August 14, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Mine Safety and Health Administration

          - 30 CFR Part 57

### CFR Correction

In Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 1 to 199, revised as of July 1, 2008, on page 358, in § 57.5060, remove paragraph (c)(3)(i) and redesignate paragraphs (c)(3)(ii), (c)(3)(iii), and (c)(3)(iv) as (c)(3)(i), (c)(3)(ii), and (c)(3)(iii) respectively.

[FR Doc. E9-9767 Filed 4-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Wayne
      Rockall, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      of
      Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.




I,
      John
      Wells, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      of
      Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.




November
      12, 2006




By:/s/
                Wayne RockallWayne
                RockallChief
                Executive Officer




By:/s/
                John WellsJohn
                WellsChief
                Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3499 

To amend the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act to clarify how 

the Act applies to condominiums. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act 

to clarify how the Act applies to condominiums. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 

4 UNITS. 

5 (a) EXEMPTION.—Section 1403 of the Interstate 

6 Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (15 U.S.C. 1702) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (b)— 

9 (A) in paragraph (7)(C), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

10 at the end; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 3499 IS

1 (B) in paragraph (8)(G), by striking the 

2 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(9) the sale or lease of a condominium unit 

5 that is not exempt under subsection (a).’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(d) For purposes of subsection (b), the term ‘condo8 minium unit’ means a unit of residential or commercial 

9 property to be designated for separate ownership pursuant 

10 to a condominium plan or declaration provided that upon 

11 conveyance— 

12 ‘‘(1) the owner of such unit will have sole own13 ership of the unit and an undivided interest in the 

14 common elements appurtenant to the unit; and 

15 ‘‘(2) the unit will be an improved lot.’’. 

16 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

18 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS