alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
44 Canal Center Plaza ▪ Suite 310 ▪ Alexandria, Virginia 22314 ▪ Tel: (703) 684-0084 ▪ Fax: (703) 684-0427

VIA E-MAIL

July 19, 2010

Mr. Jeffrey A. Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Mr. William Neuffer

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02)

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

RE: Submission of Existing Emissions Data- Industrial Insulation Group (“Industrial 

Insualtion”)

Dear Messrs. Telander and Neuffer:

The transmission of this data from the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association 

(“NAIMA”) to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is in fulfillment of Industrial 

Insulation Group and NAIMA’s commitment to provide EPA existing emissions data identified 

in NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA.

NAIMA is submitting .pdf versions via-email of existing emissions data for formaldehyde and 

particulate matter from the “Cupola Furnace Outlet Report.” This data was collected at 

Industrial Insulation’s Phenix City, Alabama facility. 

Industrial Insulation has not designated any portion of the data attached hereto as confidential 

business information (“CBI”). Company submissions that contain CBI will be marked as such 

and will be sent to:

Mr. Roberto Morales, Document Control Officer

109 T.W. Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or Chris Martin at (703) 684-0084. 

We can also be contacted by e-mail at acrane@naima.org or cmartin@naima.org.

Sincerely,

Angus E. Crane

Angus E. Crane

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Ph: (703) 684-0084 ext. 123

Fax: (703) 684-0427

Attachment
# C_2004148EN.01000501.xml

| 3.6.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.3426 - ADVENT / SPORTFIVE)

(2004/C 148/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27/05/2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3426. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3426. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of First Transaction Management,
Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
Report), I, Susan Schreter, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on
  Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with
  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and 
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained
  in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of First Transaction Management, Inc for
  such period.

|                     |  |                                                              
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: July 23, 2008 |  | /s/ Susan Schreter                                           
|                     |  |                                                              
|                     |  | Susan Schreter, Chief
  Executive and Chief Financial Officer

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
November 12, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10483 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TREMON TRAVELL BROWN,

DefendantAppellant.

------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CR-00094-18

-------------------------------------------------------
Before SMITH, DEMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tremon Travell Brown (“Brown”) appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea

conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of

cocaine base. Brown argues that his due process rights were violated by the dist rict court’s

consideration of testimony at sentencin g t hat co ncerned matters not included in the presentence

report. Brown further contends that the district court’s drug quantity determination was based upon-2-

unreliable and insufficient evidence. Brown additionally maintains that the district court erred in

calculating his criminal history category and by de nying him a reduction for acceptance of

responsibility.

Brown’s due process argument is without merit; criminal defendants do not have a due

process right to be notified in advance of the Government’s witnesses at sentencing or the substance

of their testimony. S ee United States v. Moore , 225 F.3d 637, 644 (6th Cir. 2000). Although the

drug quantity determination was based in part on the statement of a witness who repudiated that

statement at sentencing, it was the district court’s province to evaluate the c o nflicting statements

made by the witness and make a credibility determination. See United States v. Davis , 76 F.3d 82,

83-85 (5th Cir. 1996). Thus, the district court’s drug quantity determination was not clearly

erroneous or based on unreli able evidence. S ee id. We dismiss the remainder of Brown’s appeal

because Brown waived his right to appeal these issues in his plea agreement. See United States v.

Robinson , 187 F.3d 516, 517 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly report
of SaviCorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Serge Monros, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to SaviCorp. and will be retained by SaviCorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: October 25, 2013 | By: /s/ SERGE MONROS   
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|                       | Serge Monros           
|                       | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Bottling  Group,  LLC (the  "Company")  certifies to his
knowledge that:

     (1)  The  Amendment  No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
          for the year ended  December 28, 2002 (the  "Amended Form 10-K") fully
          complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Amended Form 10-K fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,  the  financial  conditions  and  results  of
          operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred
          to in the Amended Form 10-K.


                                                   /s/ Alfred H. Drewes
                                                   --------------------
                                                   Alfred H. Drewes
                                                   Principal Financial Officer
                                                   May 22, 2003

The foregoing  certification  (the  "Certification")  is being furnished  solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

A signed original of the Certification has been provided to the Company and will
be retained  by the Company in  accordance  with Rule  12b-11(d)  of the Act and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.
 /s/ D. Michael KramerD. Michael KramerPresident, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2006
 26.
First Amendment to Incentive Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 

This FIRST AMENDMENT TO INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of July 25, 2011, by and
between Digital Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Richard A. Magnuson (the “Optionee”). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Plan and the Option Agreement (each as defined below). 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the First Amended and Restated
Digital Realty Trust, Inc., Digital Services, Inc. and Digital Realty Trust, L.P. 2004 Incentive Award Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), and that certain Incentive Stock Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”), dated
as of October 28, 2004, between the Company and the Optionee, the Company granted the Optionee an option to purchase 125,263 shares of its Common Stock; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee desire to amend the Option Agreement as set forth herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby amend the Option Agreement as follows: 

1. Section 3(e)(ii) of the Option Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

“The expiration of three months following the date of the Optionee’s termination of service as both an employee
and a member of the Board of the Company for any reason other than death or Disability; or” 
 2. Section 3(e)(iii) of
the Option Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “The expiration of one
year following the date of the Optionee’s termination of service as both an employee and a member of the Board of the Company by reason of his death or Disability.” 
 3. This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Option Agreement. 
 4. Except as set forth herein, the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year
first above written. 
  

			
	DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joshua A. Mills

	Name:	 	Joshua A. Mills
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Assistant Secretary
	
	OPTIONEE
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard A. Magnuson

		 	Richard A. Magnuson



  
 S-1
Case 19-17977-SMG Doc 110 Filed 03/16/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-17977-SMG Doc 110 Filed 03/16/20 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                             5,186
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   5,186
<PP&E>                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     5,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             69,031
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                         894,794
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     (63,845)
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  31,401
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (31,401)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (31,401)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     (31,401)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Scott Kamsler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of
Exar Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.

Date:
August 11, 2008



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    J. Scott Kamsler                          
|J. Scott Kamsler                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-3600NI

_____________

Jerry A. Woodke, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Patrick Cody, doing business as * Appeal from the United States

Hawkeye Manufacturing of South * District Court for the Northern

Dakota, Inc., doing business as Truck * District of Iowa.

Trailer Sales of Yankton, Inc.; Henry J. *

Petersen, doing business as Hawkeye * [UNPUBLISHED]

Manufacturing of South Dakota, Inc., *

doing business as Truck Trailer Sales of *

Yankton, Inc., *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: May 23, 1997

Filed: May 30, 1997

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Jerry A. Woodke appeals the judgment entered on an adverse jury verdict in his

action for breach of a joint venture agreement and for an accounting. Having searched
-2-

the record and considered the parties' briefs, we find no merit in Woodke's contentions.

The district court's instructions were adequate as given. Anyway, to the extent

that Woodke complains the district court should have given his damage-related

instruction, the district court's refusal to give the instruction is harmless because the

jury found against Woodke on the merits.

We also reject Woodke's contention that the district court abused its discretion

in refusing to admit certain documents offered by Woodke. Woodke testified about

the production costs contained in the challenged documents and put other cost-related

documents into evidence; thus, the challenged evidence was merely cumulative of

Woodke's testimony and other documentary evidence.

Accordingly we affirm the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

The
undersigned, Charles M. Sprock, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Rome Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant). This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report).

| |                                                  |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | ------------------------------------------------ | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By execution
 of this statement, I certify that:
|
| |                                                  | A) | the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                                 
|
| |                                                  | B) | the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant
 as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|      |                 |                                        | 
|----- | --------------- | -------------------------------------- | 
|Date: | March 18,
 2011 | /s/ Charles
 M. Sprock                 | 
|      |                 |                                        | 
|      |                 | Charles M.
 Sprock                     | 
|      |                 | President
 and Chief Executive Officer | 

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the China Entertainment Group,, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tang Chien Chang,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                             /s/ Tang Chien Chang
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Tang Chien Chang
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)
                                             Date:  April 28, 2006


                                       23