alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with China Entertainment Group, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dorothy Wong, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                             /s/ Dorothy Wong
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Dorothy Wong
                                             Chief Accounting Officer
                                             (Principal Accounting Officer)
                                             Date:  April 28, 2006


                                       24
EXHIBIT 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF BARNEYS NEW YORK, INC.

April 25, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        State
                                                  (or jurisdiction)          Approximate Percentage of
Name                                            in which Incorporated        Voting Securities Owned by
                                                    (or Organized)                Immediate Parent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                    <C>                              <C>
Barney's, Inc.                                         New York                         100%
Barneys America, Inc. (1)                              Delaware                         100%
Barneys America (Chicago) Lease Corp. (2)              Delaware                         100%
BNY Licensing Corp. (1)                                Delaware                         100%
Barneys Asia Co. LLC (3)                               Delaware                         70%
PFP Fashions Inc. (1)                                  New York                         100%
Barneys (CA) Lease Corp. (1)                           Delaware                         100%
Barneys (NY) Lease Corp. (1)                           Delaware                         100%
Basco All-American Sportswear Corp. (1)                New York                         100%
--------------------
</TABLE>

(1)        Subsidiary of Barney's, Inc.

(2)        Subsidiary of Barneys America

(3)        Subsidiary of BNY Licensing Corp.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Jacov
      Vaisman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      Advanced Medical Institute Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of Advanced Medical Institute Inc.




I,
      Dilip
      Shrestha, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
      of
      Advanced Medical Institute Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of Advanced Medical Institute Inc.




May
      15,
      2008






By:
            /s/ Jacov
              VaismanJacov
              VaismanChief
              Executive
              Officer By:
              /s/ Dilip
                ShresthaDilip
                ShresthaChief
                  Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3261 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3261

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2012

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To allow the Chief of the Forest Service to award certain contracts for 
                           large air tankers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER.

    Notwithstanding the last sentence of section 3903(d) of title 41, 
United States Code, the Chief of the Forest Service may award contracts 
pursuant to Solicitation Number AG-024B-S-11-9009 for large air tankers 
earlier than the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the 
notification required under the first sentence of section 3903(d) of 
that title.

            Passed the Senate June 7, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
,,q,*ED S74r . UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

January 9,2 

Patricia S. Mariella, Ph.D. 

Executive Director 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Gila River Indian Communi~ LPost Office Box 97 

iL Sacaton, AZ 85247 

ella: 

letter of April 20, 2001, requesting that EPA recognize the 

Community's ability to issue permits that are practicably enforceable to limit a permittee's 

potential emissions. After reviewing this case and discussing the facts with EPA Headquarters, 

and after many years of working closely with the Gila River Department of Environmental 

Quality, we agree that the Community has the capacity to provide enforceable limits. 

As you know, EPA's existing Potential to Emit (PTE) Transition Policy for Part 71 

Implementation in Indian Country (memo dated March 7, 1999) requires an EPA-approved Clean 

Air Act program such as a Tribal Implementation Plan (TIP) in order to create synthetic minor 

sources. Meanwhile, EPA policy allows states (memo dated July 10, 1998) to limit PTE using 

programs that are not federally enforceable, such as state-only permit programs. 

You point out in your letter that the Community has a mature environmental program and tribal 

court system, that you have been conducting environmental inspections and enforcement for 

years, including issuing NOVs and collecting penalties, and that your capacity in this area rivals 

many local air pollution control agencies. We are also aware that you are developing a 

comprehensive TIP. Your letter argued that the Gila River Indian Community should be able to 

operate under the state PTE policy, and we agree. 

Therefore, in the future when your program intends to provide synthetic minor status to a specific 

source on the Reservation, please submit the following: 

- updated information about your tribal court system and enforcement program; 

- detailed information about the source; and 

- copies of the applicable regulations andlor permit. 

EPA will review the documentation and work with your staff to ensure that you have provided 

sufficient justification, in this case, for EPA to recognize a tribal PTE limit that does not stem 

from an EPA-approved program. 
Thank you for your patience. We look forward to continuing our productive relationship as we 

work together to protect tribal air resources. If you have any questions, please call Gerardo Rios, 

Air Pennits Office Chief, at 415-972-3974, or Doug McDaniel, Air Division Tribal Team 

Leader, at 415-947-4106. 

Sincerely, 

J Daniel Blair, GRIC DEQ 

P. Broadbent 

irector, Air Division
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11296 Summary Calendar

FRANK DWIGHT CARTER , Petitioner

- Appellant

v.
LORIE DAVIS , DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION , Responde nt

- Appellee

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CV

- 187

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Frank Dwight Carter, former Texas prisoner # 561942, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal of the sua sponte dismissal of
his case . The motion is a challenge to the district court’s cert ification that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 17, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11296 Document: 00514198431 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2017No. 16

- 11296

2 Carter fails to address the district court’s reasons for finding his case to be frivolous . Pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Nevertheless, when an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed the decision. Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
Because Carter has failed to challenge any factual or legal aspect of the district court’s disposition of his claims or the certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith, he has abandoned the critical i ssue of his appeal. See
id . Thus, the appeal lacks arguable merit. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d

at 202 n.24; 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Carter is WARNED that filing further frivolous appeals will subject him to sanctions. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 38; Clark v. Green , 814 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1987). Case: 16-11296 Document: 00514198431 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/17/2017
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. § 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| /s/                Larry D. Ryan                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                     Larry                D. Ryan                                                                                                                                                           |
| Title:                       Chief                Executive Officer                                                                                                                                    |
| Date:                       May                9, 2008                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| /s/                Stanley W. Farmer                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Name:      Stanley                W. Farmer                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Title:                       Vice                President and                                 Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:                       May                9, 2008                                                                                                                                                 |

----
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MineralRite Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guy Peckham , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








May 31, 2013
By:
/s/ Guy PeckhamGuy PeckhamIts:
Chief Executive Officer and President








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32



The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No.
33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Infonet Services Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: February 9, 2005



/s/    JOSÉ A.
COLLAZOJosé A. Collazo Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infonet Services Corporation and will be retained by Infonet Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Infonet Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 9, 2005



/s/    AKBAR H.
FIRDOSYAkbar H. Firdosy Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infonet Services Corporation and will be retained by Infonet Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| – | Purchase Agreement covers the purchase of 100% the Caspiche property mineral rights (“the Property”) by Exeter Resource Corporation (the “Company”) from Anglo American Norte S.A. (“Anglo”); |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| – | The Company exercised its option to acquire a 100% interest in the Property in February 2011; |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| – | Anglo is entitled to a 3% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) from production of the Property; |
|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| – | Anglo has the right to buy the Property back by reimbursing certain of the Company’s expenditures incurred on the Property if it is not put into production within 15 years from the date the Company exercised its option; |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| – | The Company is required to make advance royalty payments of US$250,000 annually to Anglo until March 31, 2020 and thereafter US$1.0 million annually to Anglo for the period March 31, 2021 to March 31, 2025 or until commencement of commercial production; |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| – | If commercial production commences prior to March 31, 2025, the advance royalty payments will cease and NSR will be payable. |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 4, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00743

- CV

Neurodiagnostic Consultants, LLC d/b/a Synaptic Resources of Austin, LLC,

a Texas Limited Liability Company, Appellant

v.

Corey Villalobos, Appe llee

APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND S MITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on October 17, 2018

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial cour t’s interlocutory order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial

court’s interlocutory order

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this

Court and in the court below.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40718 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ-IGNACIO, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 7:05-CR-1119

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Gabriel Hernandez-Ignacio pleaded guilty ofbeing present illegally in the United States after deportation and was sentenced to 57 months in prison and United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 17, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-40718

2 twoyears ofsupervised release. For the first time on appeal, Hernandez-Ignacio argues that the 16-level crime-of-violence increase under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)- (A)(ii) is erroneous because his Texas conviction of aggravated assault does not qualify as a crime ofviolence under either definition applicable to that provision. In United States v. Guillen-Alvarez, 489 F.3d 197, 199-201 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2007 WL 2590919 (U.S. Oct. 9, 2007) (No. 07-6315), this court held that aggravated assault under T EX
. P ENAL CODE § 22.02(a) qualifies as a conviction for an enumerated offense of aggravated assault and a crime of violence under§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). The 16-level crime-of-violence increase under that subsection was not imposed in error, plain or otherwise. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005). In light ofAppre

ndi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Hernandez-Ignacio challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements ofthe offense that must be found by a jury. This court has held that this issue is “fully foreclosed from further debate.” U nited States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). AFFIRMED.