alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Articles 

#           Lake-specific responses to elevated atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, U.S.A      

      January 1, 2003    

We explored variability among subalpine lakes sharing very similar climate and atmospheric conditions, but differing in watershed characteristics, hydrology, and food web structure. Special attention was given to nitrogen (N) dynamics because the study area receives some of the highest levels of atmospheric N deposition in the Rocky Mountains. We asked if the effect of regional N deposition would be manifested uniformly among neighboring lakes both in terms of ambient conditions and responses to greater nutrient inputs. Catchment vegetation appeared to be the main determinant of ambient nitrate (NO3), phosphate (PO4), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations, although in-lake differences in recycling produced variable and contrasting NH4 levels. Phytoplankton chlorophyll atemporarily responded to early season NO3 peaks in the lakes with rocky watersheds, but chlorophyll means over the ice-free season were remarkably similar among lakes despite differences in both nutrient supply and zooplankton grazing. In most cases, phosphorus was limiting to phytoplankton growth, although the importance of N deficiencies was greater in lakes with forested watersheds and fringing wetlands.

## Citation Information

## Related Content

                  -              Connect           

#### Jill S Baron, PhD

##### Research Ecologist, Senior Scientist (ST)

Fort Collins Science Center

jill_baron@usgs.gov

970-491-1968

## Related Content

#### Jill S Baron, PhD

##### Research Ecologist, Senior Scientist (ST)

Fort Collins Science Center

jill_baron@usgs.gov

970-491-1968

### Study Area

### Contact

####               Fort Collins Science Center          

2150 Centre AvenueBldg CFort Collins, CO80526United States

970-226-9100

970-226-9230

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - Rocky Mountains
                  - Colorado

View All **
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         HORSESHOE GAMING HOLDING CORP.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                          STATE OF INCORPORATION/FORMATION
----------                                          --------------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>

Horseshoe GP, Inc. (1)                                          Nevada
New Gaming Capital Partnership (2)                              Nevada
Horseshoe Entertainment (3)                                     Louisiana
Bossier City Land Corporation (4)                               Louisiana
Robinson Property Group, Limited Partnership (2)                Mississippi
Horseshoe Hammond, Inc. (1)                                     Indiana
Hammond Residential LLC (5)                                     Indiana
Horseshoe Gaming, Inc. (1)                                      Nevada
Horseshoe Ventures, LLC (6)                                     Delaware
Red Oak Insurance Company Ltd. (1)                              Barbados
Horseshoe Shreveport, L.L.C.(1)                                 Louisiana
Casino Computer Programming, Inc.(1)                            Indiana
Horseshoe License Company (7)                                   Nevada
Horseshoe Casino MO, LLC (8)                                    Missouri
</TABLE>

-------------
(1) 100% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.

(2) 99% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp. through Limited Partner interest
    and 1% owned by Horseshoe GP, Inc. through General Partner interest

(3) New Gaming Capital Partnership owns 89% General Partner interest and a 2.92%
    Limited Partner interest. Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp. owns the remaining
    8.08% Limited Partner interest.

(4) 100% owned by Horseshoe Entertainment

(5) 100% owned by Horseshoe Hammond, Inc.

(6) 80% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.

(7) 49% owned by Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corp.

(8) 70% owned by Horseshoe Ventures, LLC
LONG CHAIN CHLORINATED PARAFFIN PRODUCTION PROCESS

C19-C28 Paraffin (20000 kg/batch) Cl2 (40000 kg/batch) NaOH / H20

 HCl (20000 kg/batch) WASTE CPAR (7.2 kg/batch)

 Cl2 (7229 kg/batch)

STABILIZER (400 kg/batch) CPAR (40,000 kg/batch) 32% HCl

EPOXIDIZED SOYBEAN OIL

 12.5% BLEACH

 CPAR 

 = RELEASE POINT

BYPRODUCT GAS 

RECOVERY

CHLORINATION 

REACTION

OFF -SITE 

INCINERATION

CPAR

STORAGE

BLEACH

STORAGE

HCL

STORAGE

TRUCK

SALES

(2.5 MM kg/yr)

BLEACH

SALES

HCL ACID

CARBON

TREATMENT

HCL ACID

SALES

CARBON WASTE 

TO: LANDFILL

(3 kg/batch)

X

2

1

PRODUCT SOLD FOR

RUBBER PRODUCTS 

MANUFACTURING

(2.0 MM kg/yr)

PRODUCT SOLD FOR

LUBRICANT 

MANUFACTURING

(0.5 MM kg/yr)
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.29

                        NON-NEGOTIABLE PROMISSORY NOTE
                        ------------------------------

                                                                   Deerfield, IL
$200,000                                                        January 16, 2001


         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby promises to pay to Web
Street, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Corporation"), Two Hundred Thousand
($200,000) Dollars, on or before January 16, 2004, with interest accruing from
the date hereof at the rate of Six (6.00 %) Percent per annum, and with interest
only payable quarterly as follows: on or before each April 30, July 31, October
31, and January 31 (or, if any such dates be a weekend or national bank holiday,
on the business day next following) of each year that this Note is outstanding,
until the entire principal amount and all outstanding interest thereon has been
paid in full.

         The loan obligation represented by this Note, as well as all other then
outstanding loans owed to the Corporation by the undersigned, will be subject to
complete forgiveness, grossed up for all applicable tax effects, upon attainment
of either of the following objectives: (i) a sale of the Company at a per share
   ------
price, or valuation, that is no less than the lesser of (A) Two (2) times the
                                              ------
average trailing closing bid price of the Company's common stock for the Ten
(10) trading days immediately preceding the date of signing of a definitive
agreement, or (B) $6 per share; or (ii) achievement of calendar year 2001 gross
revenues no less than Fifty (50%) Percent in excess of calendar year 2000 gross
revenues.

         Payments of both principal and interest are to be made at the principal
offices of the Corporation, or at such other place or places as may from time to
time be designated in writing by the Payee or legal holder of this Note. All or
any part of the principal of this Note may be prepaid at any time or times, in
whole or in part, without notice, premium or penalty.

         In the event of a default in payment of any installment or amount due
hereunder, which default remains uncured for a period of ten (10) days or more
after written notice thereof, the entire unpaid principal balance and accrued
interest thereon shall become immediately due and payable. In the event of a
default, the Payee or legal holder of this Note shall be entitled to recover
reasonable costs of collection, including attorneys' fees and legal expenses.


                                                              /s/ Joseph Fox
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0500 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-014-AD

Helicopter Model: All Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH model EC135 helicopters, except the EC 135 P2+ 

and T2+ Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 218 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect shifting of the plain journal bearing, which could 

limit the movement of the collective control and result in subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $38,586 (swashplate assembly)

Labor per Helicopter

(.25 x $85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

(8 x $85/work-hour for the 

replacement)

$22 per cycle

$680

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $

Total US Fleet Cost $

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
Fourth Amendment




 EXHIBIT 10.5.4 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT 
 TO 

THE JULY 5, 2005 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF 
 DCP MIDSTREAM, LLC

 This Fourth Amendment to the July 5, 2005 Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of DCP
Midstream, LLC (formerly known as Duke Energy Field Services, LLC) (this “Amendment”), is dated as of November 9, 2010 and by and between ConocoPhillips Gas Company, a Delaware corporation (“CPGC”) and Spectra
Energy DEFS Holding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Spectra LLC”) and Spectra Energy DEFS Holding Corp, a Delaware corporation (“Spectra Corp”). Spectra LLC and Spectra Corp are referred to herein
collectively as “Spectra.” 
 RECITALS 

 

	A.	Reference is made to that certain Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC dated as of July 5, 2005 by
and between CPGC and Duke Energy Enterprise Corporation (formerly Duke Energy Field Services Corporation), a Delaware corporation, as amended by First Amendment dated August 11, 2006, the Second Amendment dated as of February 1, 2007 and
the Third Amendment dated as of April 30, 2009 (the “Agreement”) (capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given thereto in the LLC Agreement). 


 

	B.	CPGC and Spectra desire to amend the Agreement to provide for the indemnification of the Members in claims made against the members based solely upon their ownership in
the Company. 

 FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereto hereby agree as follows: 
 1. The Agreement is hereby amended by adding a sentence to the end of the current language in
Section 2.10 “Liability to Third Parties”which reads as follows: 
 The Company shall defend,
indemnify and hold each Member and each Member’s owners, up to and including the parent companies of the Members, ConocoPhillips and Spectra Energy Corp, harmless from and against any claims brough against that Member or its parent companies,
solely as a result of the Member’s ownership in the Company. 
 [THE REMAINDER
OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 

  
 1 of 2










 ON THE DATE FIRST SET FORTH ABOVE, each of the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be duly executed and
delivered. 
  

			
	SPECTRA ENERGY DEFS HOLDING, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John P. Reddy

	Name:	 	 John P. Reddy

	Title:	 	 Manager & President



  

			
	SPECTRA ENERGY DEFS HOLDING CORP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John P. Reddy

	Name:	 	 John P. Reddy

	Title:	 	 President & Director



  

			
	CONOCOPHILLIPS GAS COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. W. Sheets

	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	  




  
 2 of 2
J. Parker Erkmann T: +1 202 776 2036 perkmann@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM November 7, 2014

VIA REGULATIONS.GOV & EMAIL

Robert Finamore Division Chief Foreign Air Carrier Licensing U.S. Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2014-0188

Dear Mr. Finamore:

JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) has completed its polling of carriers served with its Application for Exemption Authority to initiate service between Fort Lauderdale, Florida’s Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport and Mexico City, Mexico’s Benito Juárez International Airport (“MEX”) and between Orlando, Florida’s Orlando International Airport and MEX.

JetBlue has received a “no objection” from all carriers who were served with the application.

Sincerely,

/s/

J. Parker Erkmann Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

CC: Service List
EX10.9-KALU






Exhibit 10.9




COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS 


Effective as of June 9, 2011


     Each non-employee director of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (the “Company”) shall receive: 
	
				
	 
	-
	 
	an annual retainer of $45,000 per year;

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	-
	 
	an annual grant of restricted stock having a value equal to $75,000;

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	-
	 
	a fee of $1,500 per day for each meeting of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) attended in person and $750 per day for each such meeting attended by phone; and

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	-
	 
	a fee of $1,500 per day for each committee meeting of the board of directors attended in person ($2,000 per day for each such audit committee meeting) and $750 per day for each such meeting attended by phone ($1,000 per day for each such audit committee meeting).

	 
	 
	 
	 




In addition, the Lead Independent Director shall receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000, the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board shall receive an additional annual retainer of $15,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board shall receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000 and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board shall receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000, with all such amounts payable at the same time as the annual retainer. Each non-employee director may elect to receive shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company in lieu of any or all of his or her annual retainer, including any additional annual retainer for service as the Lead Independent Director or the Chairman of a committee. 


     The payment of annual retainers (including any additional annual retainers) and the annual grant of restricted stock shall be made each year on the date on which the Company holds its annual meeting of stockholders or such other date as the Board may determine. The number of shares of common stock to be received in the grant of restricted stock, as well as the number of shares of common stock to be received by any non-employee director electing to receive common stock in lieu of any or all of his or her payment of annual retainer (including any additional annual retainer), shall be based on the closing price per share of common stock on the date such grant and payments are made. 


     The Company shall reimburse all directors for travel and other disbursements relating to meetings of the Board and committees thereof, and non-employee directors shall be provided accident insurance with respect to Company-related business travel.
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 20-7064 September Term, 2020 1: 20-c v -014 25-UNA Filed O n: Decem ber 2 , 20 20 Brud Rudo lph Ro ssma n,

App ellant
v . Miri am Se well, Reh abilitat ion S erv ices Adm inistration , etal.,

App ellees ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Mill ett and Pillard, Circuit Ju dges, a nd Sen telle, Sen ior Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s Ju ne 8, 2 020 orde r dism issing appe llant’s co mp laint b e a f f irmed . T he district cou rt correctly conclud ed tha t app ellant ’s com plaintwas f rivolou s. S ee 28 U.S.C. § 19 15(e )(2)(B); Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 , 53 6-37 (197 4). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Michael C. McGrail Depu ty Cl erk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0013

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ROSS TROMBLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 10, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 4 2024

06/04/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0013
# C_2004175EN.01000501.xml

| 7.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3425 — NORDIC CAPITAL / TRENOR)

(2004/C 175/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3425. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3425. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
ex10-49.htm




EXHIBIT 10.49


 


AMENDMENT TO


STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


dated October 20, 2010







THIS AMENDMENT dated effective as of October 20, 2010 (“Amendment”), to each of the Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements, dated October 20, 2010 (the “Agreement”), is made by and between Cameron International Corporation (the “Company”) and the Participant (“Participant”), respecting each of the Participant’s Agreements;


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant have heretofore entered into one or more of the Agreements; and


 


WHEREAS, the Agreements provided for ten year option term, but the Equity Incentive Plan had not yet been amended to provide for an option term of 10 years and at the time of grant permitted an option term of up to only seven years; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend each Agreement, separately and respectively, in order to bring each Agreement into compliance with the terms of the Equity Incentive Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and the mutual agreement set forth herein, the Company and the Participant hereby agree, effective as of October 20, 2010, that each Participant’s Agreement, separately and respectively, shall be amended as hereafter provided:


 


1. Section 4 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:







4.           Vesting.  The Option granted pursuant to the Agreement (“Option”) may be exercised, in whole or in part, but only as to the number of Shares as to which the right to exercise has vested at the time of exercise, during the period beginning October 20, 2011 (one year from the date on which it was granted), and ending October 20, 2017 (seven years from the date on which Option was granted.).







2.           This Amendment shall supersede any prior agreement between the Company and Participant relating to the subject matter of this Amendment and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and any successors to the Company and all persons lawfully claiming under the Participant.


 


3.           As amended hereby, the Agreement is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment, effective as of October 20, 2010.


 



	  	
                              CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


	  	  	
  /s/  William C. Lemmer                          


	  	
Name:

	
William C. Lemmer


	  	
Title:    

	
Senior Vice President and General Counsel


	  	
Date:   

	
July 31, 2011


	
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED


            “PARTICIPANT”

	  
	
 


Signature:

	 	  
	
Print Name:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001096637
<NAME> GENE-CELL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         148,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,836
<PP&E>                                         263,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,956
<BONDS>                                         28,738
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,778
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,337
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (342,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (342,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (342,976)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>