alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1007

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Refugio Torres-Ramos, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 4, 2002 Filed: April 9, 2002

___________ Before MURPHY, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Refugio Torres-Ramos appeals his conviction and the sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon his guilty plea to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief stating Torres-Ramos seeks to withdraw his guilty plea.-2- At the July 2001 change-of-plea hearing, Torres-Ramos entered a plea under North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 (1970). In August 2001, he moved to withdraw his plea (setting forth his reasons in an attached letter). In October 2001, however, he moved to dismiss his guilty-plea-withdrawal motion and to reschedule sentencing (indicating in an attached letter that he did not wish to forfeit a potential acceptance-of-responsibility reduction); the court granted this motion. In November 2001, the court sentenced Torres-Ramos, without objection, to 135 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Assuming arguendo that Torres-Ramos has not relinquished his plea-invalidity claim, see United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993) (claim relinquished below need not be addressed on appeal), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing his plea-withdrawal motion, see United States v. Bahena , 223 F.3d 797, 807 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1181 (2001). Torres-Ramos’s second letter indicated his desire to persist in his guilty plea, receive an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction, and be sentenced. Moreover, in his plea colloquy, he affirmed that his plea was voluntary, that he was satisfied with counsel’s advice, and that if the government presented its evidence a jury would likely find him guilty as charged. SeeNguyen v. United States , 114 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 1997) (defendant’s representations during plea-taking carry strong presumption of verity); cf. Bahena , 223 F.3d at 806-07 (defendant’s plea-withdrawal motion was rebutted by defendant’s declaration under oath at change-of-plea hearing that he understood proceedings, was satisfied with his lawyer, and had committed crimes charged; plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, and defendant did not show any fair and just reason for withdrawing it). Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.-3- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicant

Trans BOS, LLC dba Transgroup International, 140 Eastern Avenue, 
Chelsea, MA 02150. Officer: Brenda Richards, Vice President (Qualifying 
Individual).

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicant

Estes Forwarding Woldwide LLC, 1100 Commerce Road, Richmond, VA 23224. 
Officer: Harold Weekly, Managing Director (Qualifying Individual).

    Dated: April 17, 2009.
Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-9266 Filed 4-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2019013DE.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.1.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 13/12 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 853/2004 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 29. April 2004 mit spezifischen Hygienevorschriften für Lebensmittel tierischen Ursprungs

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 139 vom 30. April 2004](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_139_R_TOC)
)

(
[Berichtigte Fassung im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 226 vom 25. Juni 2004](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_226_R_TOC)
)

Seite 25 Artikel 1 Absatz 3 Buchstabe c

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „c) | die direkte Abgabe kleiner Mengen von Primärerzeugnissen durch den Erzeuger an den Endverbraucher oder an örtliche Einzelhandelsunternehmen, die die Erzeugnisse direkt an den Endverbraucher abgeben;“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „c) | die direkte Abgabe kleiner Mengen von Primärerzeugnissen durch den Erzeuger an den Endverbraucher oder an örtliche Betriebe des Einzelhandels, die die Erzeugnisse direkt an den Endverbraucher abgeben;“. |

Seite 25 Artikel 1 Absatz 3 Buchstabe d

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „d) | die direkte Abgabe kleiner Mengen von Fleisch von Geflügel und Hasentieren, das/die im landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb geschlachtet worden ist/sind, durch den Erzeuger an den Endverbraucher oder an örtliche Einzelhandelsunternehmen, die dieses Fleisch als Frischfleisch direkt an den Endverbraucher abgeben;“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „d) | die direkte Abgabe kleiner Mengen von Fleisch von Geflügel und Hasentieren, das/die im landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb geschlachtet worden ist/sind, durch den Erzeuger an den Endverbraucher oder an örtliche Betriebe des Einzelhandels, die dieses Fleisch als Frischfleisch direkt an den Endverbraucher abgeben;“. |

Seite 25 Artikel 1 Absatz 3 Buchstabe e

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „e) | Jäger, die kleine Mengen von Wild oder Wildfleisch direkt an den Endverbraucher oder an örtliche Einzelhandelsunternehmen zur direkten Abgabe an den Endverbraucher abgeben.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „e) | Jäger, die kleine Mengen von Wild oder Wildfleisch direkt an den Endverbraucher oder an örtliche Betriebe des Einzelhandels, zur direkten Abgabe an den Endverbraucher abgeben.“. |

Seite 56 Anhang III Abschnitt VI Nummer 1 Buchstabe f

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „f) | Hornhaut und“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „f) | hornartiges Gewebe und“. |

---
# C_2004175EN.01000601.xml

| 7.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3424 — CIBA / RAISIO CHEMICALS)

(2004/C 175/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3424. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3424. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 335 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 335

                  For the relief of Salah Naji Sujaa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2011

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Salah Naji Sujaa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SALAH NAJI SUJAA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) and section 
240 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a), Salah Naji Sujaa shall be eligible 
for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 
of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Salah Naji Sujaa enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Salah 
Naji Sujaa shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully 
and, if otherwise eligible, shall be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Salah Naji Sujaa, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
Salah Naji Sujaa's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
Salah Naji Sujaa's birth under section 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 
1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0579 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004D0579

**2004/579/EC: Council Decision of 29 April 2004 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organised Crime **

*
Official Journal L 261 , 06/08/2004 P. 0069 - 0069 *

Council Decision of 29 April 2004 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organised Crime (2004/579/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 47, 55, 95 and 179, in conjunction with Articles 300(2) first sentence and 300(3) first subparagraph thereof;

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(1),

Whereas:

(1) The elements of the Convention which are subject to Community competence were negotiated by the Commission, with the approval of the Council, on behalf of the Community.

(2) The Council instructed the Commission to negotiate the accession of the Community to the Convention in question.

(3) Negotiations were successfully concluded and the resulting instrument has been signed by the Community on 12 December 2000 in accordance with Decision 2001/87/EC(2).

(4) Some Member States are parties to the Convention while the ratification process is under way in other Member States.

(5) The conditions permitting the Community to deposit the instrument of approval provided for in Article 36(3) of the Convention have been fulfilled.

(6) The Convention should be approved to enable the Community to become a party to it within the limits of its competence.

(7) The Community shall, when depositing the instrument of approval, also deposit a declaration on the extent of the European Community's competence with respect to matters governed by the Convention under Article 36(3) thereof,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The United Nations Convention against transnational organised crime is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Convention is set out in Annex I.

Article 2

The President of the Council is authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to deposit the Community's instrument of formal confirmation in order to bind the Community. The instrument of formal confirmation shall comprise a declaration of competence according to Article 36(3) of the Convention, as set out in Annex II. It shall also contain a Statement as set out in Annex III.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2004 .

For the Council

The President

M. Mc Dowell

(1) Opinion delivered on 13 January 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2) OJ L 30, 1.2.2001, p. 44.
# L_2004396EN.01006101.xml

| 31.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 396/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 396/61

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPOL KINSHASA/1/2004

of 9 December 2004

concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission of the EU Police Mission in Kinshasa (DRC), EUPOL ‘Kinshasa’

(2004/931/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 25(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2004/847/CFSP of 9 December 2004 on the launching of the EU Police Mission in Kinshasa (DRC) (1), and in particular Article 5 and 8 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Articles 5 and 8 of Joint Action 2004/847/CFSP provides that the Council authorises the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty on European Union, including the powers to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Articles 5 and 8 of Joint Action 2004/847/CFSP provides that the Council authorises the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty on European Union, including the powers to appoint, upon a proposal by the Secretary-General/High Representative, a Head of Mission.

| (2) | The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Mr Adílio CUSTÓDIO, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Mr Adílio CUSTÓDIO,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Adílio CUSTÓDIO is hereby appointed Head of Mission of the EU Police Mission in Kinshasa (DRC) regarding the Integrated Police Unit (IPU) (EUPOL Kinshasa) from the day the mission will be launched. Until that date, he shall act as the Head of the Planning Team.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until 31 December 2005.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2004.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

A. HAMER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 367, 14.12.2004, p. 30.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GILBERTO ENRIQUEZVALENZUELA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10144

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-02893-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Gilberto Enriquez-Valenzuela appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

30-month sentence for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952,

and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

FILED

JAN 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10144

§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(vii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Enriquez-Valenzuela’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Enriquez-Valenzuela with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interactive Marketing Technology,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
August 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), Martin Goldrod, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interactive Marketing Technology, Inc., and will be retained by
Interactive Marketing Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Martin Goldrod
--------------------------
Martin Goldrod
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2004
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the date and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:       February 22, 2008 |   |   | /s/      Tang Chien Chang              |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   |   | Tang      Chien ChangChief      Executive Officer (Principal ExecutiveOfficer)                          |
II 

Calendar No. 411 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3221 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 

higher wages to their employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2012 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. RISCH, Mr. THUNE, Mr. 

LEE, Mr. VITTER, Mr. HATCH, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. COBURN, and Mr. 

MCCONNELL) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

MAY 23, 2012 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit 

employers to pay higher wages to their employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rewarding Achieve5 ment and Incentivizing Successful Employees Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RAISE Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 3221 PCS

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES. 

2 Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

3 U.S.C. 159(a)) is amended— 

4 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization’s exclusive 

7 representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and 

8 conditions of any collective bargaining contract or agree9 ment then in effect, nothing in either— 

10 ‘‘(A) section 8(a)(1) or section 8(a)(5), or 

11 ‘‘(B) a collective bargaining contract or agree12 ment renewed or entered into after the date of en13 actment of the RAISE Act, 

14 shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the 

15 unit greater wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by 

16 reason of, his or her services as an employee of such em17 ployer, than provided for in such contract or agreement.’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 411 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3221 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to perployees. mit employers to pay higher wages to their emMAY 23, 2012 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 4.8.10 - Electronic Catalogue (2)- Exterior Graph