alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
         Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Whitney Farmer, certify that:

     (1)  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Redwood
Entertainment Group, Inc., (the "Company");

     (2)  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

     (3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

     (4)  The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

          a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
     that material information relating to the Company is made known to us
     by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
     which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
     controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     (5)  The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the
audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons fulfilling
the equivalent function):

          (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability
     to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
     identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in
     internal controls; and

          (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
     or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
     internal controls; and

     (6)  The Company's other certifying officer and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.

Date: September 23, 2003      By: /S/ Whitney Farmer
                              --------------------------------------
                              Whitney Farmer, Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 5

Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-5 Filed 07/19/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 19-17544-RBR Doc 37-5 Filed 07/19/19 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL STAR, INCORPORATED FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# L_2005056EN.01003501.xml

| 2.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 56/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/35

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2004/104/EC of 14 October 2004 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 72/245/EEC relating to the radio interference (electromagnetic compatibility) of vehicles and amending Directive 70/156/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 337 of 13 November 2004
  )

| 1. | Delete the Directive number and subsequent rule in the titles of the graphs in Annex I:






  — | appendix 2 (page 28), |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Delete the Directive number and subsequent rule in the titles of the graphs in Annex I:

—

appendix 2 (page 28),

| — | appendix 3 (page 29), |
| --- | --- |

—

appendix 3 (page 29),

| — | appendix 4 (page 30), |
| --- | --- |

—

appendix 4 (page 30),

| — | appendix 5 (page 31), |
| --- | --- |

—

appendix 5 (page 31),

| — | appendix 6 (page 32), |
| --- | --- |

—

appendix 6 (page 32),

| — | appendix 7 (page 33). |
| --- | --- |

—

appendix 7 (page 33).

| 2. | On page 35, in Annex II A, in the title: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 35, in Annex II A, in the title:

for:

‘Commission Directive 2004/78/EC’,

read:

‘Directive 2004/104/EC’.

| 3. | On page 38, in Annex II B, in the title: |
| --- | --- |

3.

On page 38, in Annex II B, in the title:

for:

‘Commission Directive 95/54/EC’,

read:

‘Directive 2004/104/EC’.

| 4. | On page 40, in Annex III A, in the title: |
| --- | --- |

4.

On page 40, in Annex III A, in the title:

for:

‘Commission Directive 95/54/EC’,

read:

‘Directive 2004/104/EC’.

| 5. | On page 42, in Annex III B, in the title: |
| --- | --- |

5.

On page 42, in Annex III B, in the title:

for:

‘Commission Directive 95/54/EC’,

read:

‘Directive 2004/104/EC’.

| 6. | On page 43, in Annex III C, sixth line: |
| --- | --- |

6.

On page 43, in Annex III C, sixth line:

for:

‘Directive 2004/XX/EC’,

read:

‘Directive 2004/104/EC’.

| 7. | On page 45, insert the following paragraph 1.3: |
| --- | --- |

7.

On page 45, insert the following paragraph 1.3:

| ‘1.3 | As an initial step the levels of emissions in the FM frequency band (76 o 108 MHz) shall be measured at the vehicle broadcast radio antenna with an average detector. If the level specified in paragraph 6.3.2.4 of Annex I is not exceeded, then the vehicle shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of this Annex in respect of that frequency band and the full test shall not be carried out.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1.3

---
DRAFT AGENDA C.S. DEPARTRlENT OFENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGJ' EFFICIEECY AND RENEW'ABLE ENERGY PUBLIC MEETING ONENERGY CONSERVATION PROGMICI FOR

CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND CORXBXERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT PLACE OFRIEETING: FORRESTAL BVILDING 1000 INDEPENDENCE AF'ENUE, SW ROOM 1E-245 WASHI-VGTON,DC 20585 TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127 TELEFAX: 203-586-4617 D IRIE: TCESDAY, SEFTEICIBER 11,2001 9:00 A.M. 

### - Toor PURPOSE OFTHE RlEETING

e purpose of this public meeting is to: 1)update the status of priority rulemakings and to discuss factors used in reaching these priorities; and 2) discuss the criteria and process for an expanded program. 

### I. OPENING RERIARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS 11, AGENDA RE\'IE'tl' 111. Introduction A. NEP Action Items IV. PRJORITIES FOR EXISTING PROGRAII1 A. Criteria for Prioritization V. POTENTIAL NEW PRODUCTS A. Criteria for Selection B. BrainstormingVI. 

### NEXT STEPS A. Follow-up Action Items 

### B. Continuing Communication

ADJOURNMENT
##### 



[ * ] = Certain information on this page has been redacted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
 EXHIBIT 10.70
  VIA FAX AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
 
 Amendment No. 7 to Drug Discovery Collaboration Agreement dated September 13,
2002
  InterMune Array Agreement
   Term and Termination of Research Collaboration




---



##### 



Research Phase Payment Schedule
  3280 Bayshore Boulevard, Brisbane, CA 94005 Tel: 415.466.2200 Fax: 415.466.2300
   [ * ] = Certain information on this page has been redacted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
 2




---



##### 



Sincerely,/s/ Lawrence BlattLawrence Blatt, Ph.D.
Chief Scientific Officer
 cc:
    
    General Counsel, Array
Mr. Larry Kahn, InterMune
   By:
    
    /s/ David SnitmanName:
    
    David SnitmanTitle:
    
    COO
 [ * ] = Certain information on this page has been redacted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
 3
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Derek Ivany                    |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Derek Ivany                              |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  May 16, 2011                             |

|   By: |   /s/ Victor Cantor                  |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Victor Cantore                           |
|  Title:    |  Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  May 16, 2011                             |
FIRST AMENDMENT TO BY-LAW NO. 1



Dated April 11, 2006







By-law No. 1 of the Company is hereby amended by:



1.

Deleting the phrase of whom a majority shall be resident Canadians and in section 2.1, so that such section now reads as follows:



2.1

Number.  The number of directors shall, subject to the articles of the Corporation and any unanimous shareholder agreement, be fixed by the directors or if not so fixed, shall be the number of directors elected or continued as directors at the immediately preceding annual meeting of the Corporation.  The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by a board of directors of whom, if any of the issued securities of the Corporation are or were a part of a distribution to the public, at least two shall not be officers or employees of the Corporation or any affiliate of the Corporation.



2.

Deleting the second sentence of section 2.15, so that such section now reads as follows:



2.15

Committee of Directors.The directors may appoint from among their number a committee of directors and subject to the Act may delegate to such committee any of the powers of the directors.







Amendment passed by the Directors, April 11, 2006.



Amendment confirmed by the shareholders, May 17, 2006.





/s/ Nancy Glaister

_____________________________

Corporate Secretary
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE**

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Quest Software, Inc. 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-82784, 333-38002, 333-49668,333-91429, 333-96183 and 333-103010 on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 333-46648 on Form S-3; and Registration Statement No. 333-63596 on Form S-4 of Quest Software, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 2003 (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to a change in accounting method) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quest Software, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in ouraforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of Quest Software, Inc. and subsidiaries, listed in Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

March 28, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3276 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 424
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3276

                          [Report No. 112-174]

 To extend certain amendments made by the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein, from the Select Committee on Intelligence, reported the 
    following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the 
                                calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend certain amendments made by the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FAA Sunsets Extension Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF FISA AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2008 SUNSET.

    (a) Extension.--Section 403(b)(1) of the FISA Amendments Act of 
2008 (Public Law 110-261; 50 U.S.C. 1881 note) is amended by striking 
``December 31, 2012'' and inserting ``June 1, 2017''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 403(b)(2) of such 
Act (Public Law 110-261; 122 Stat. 2474) is amended by striking 
``December 31, 2012'' and inserting ``June 1, 2017''.
    (c) Orders in Effect.--Section 404(b)(1) of such Act (Public Law 
110-261; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended in the heading by striking 
``December 31, 2012'' and inserting ``June 1, 2017''.
                                                       Calendar No. 424

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3276

                          [Report No. 112-174]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To extend certain amendments made by the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2012

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar
```
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42008

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

RYAN WAYNE KANADY

,

Defendant-Appellant

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 800

Filed: November 5, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, Sta te Appella te Public Defender , Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen , Deputy
Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Ryan Wayne Kanady pled guilty to domestic violence . Idaho Code § § 18

- 903, 18

-

918(2) . The district court sentenced Kanady to a unified sentence of ten years with two years

determinate

. Kanady filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied.

Kanady appeals asserting that the di strict court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 35

motion

.
A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Gill , 15 0 Idaho 183

, 18 6, 244 P. 3 d 1269, 1272 (Ct. App. 2010 ). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court i n support of the2 motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). An appeal from the

denial of a Rule 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence absent

the presentation of new information. Id. Because no new or additional information in support of

Kanady ’s Rule 35 motion was presented , the district court did not abuse its discretion . For the

foregoing reasons, the district court’s order denying Kanady ’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50519

CHRISTOPHER HUTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS; CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS; MAX J. WESTBROOK; STACY HOLLEY; JANE DOE #2, Nurse; ELIZABETH WATSON, Police Chief; TERRY KEEL, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-96-CV-572

- - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Christopher Hutson requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal so that he may appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the appellees. To proceed IFP on appeal, Hutson must demonstrate financial eligibility and a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982).No. 97-50519 -2- Hutson argues that material fact issues remain which would preclude summary judgment with respect to his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Texas Tort Claims Act that he had been denied adequate medical care while in the Travis County Central Booking Facility. We have reviewed the record and Hutson’s brief and hold that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. Hutson has not presented a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The appellees’ motion to strike the Clerk’s order is DENIED.
MOTIONS DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40723 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

EDGAR OTTONEL VANEGAS ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19

- CR

- 419

- 1

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Ottonel Vanegas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vanegas h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the re levant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 28, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40723 Document: 00515325467 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/28/2020No. 19

- 40723

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further resp onsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40723 Document: 00515325467 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/28/2020