alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of inContact, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian S. Moroney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    BRIAN S. MORONEY
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Brian S. Moroney                                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EPA Presentation at National Institute for Storage Management (NISTM) Conference

March 28, 2012

EPA staff presented an overview of the proposed changes to the UST regulation and answered 

questions on the proposal. The conversation focused on the proposal to remove the deferral from 

airport hydrant systems. 

Attendees:

Tim Smith, EPA

Bill Frye, C& S Cos.

Neal Edington, Fuel Tech Inc.

Charles Tiso, ATS

Christopher Vert, Argus Consulting, Inc.

Kevin Murphy, Enterprise Engineering, Inc.

Gilbert Merchant, Bangor International Airport

Alex Sanchez, Cherokee Enterprises

Roberto Finale, Vecenergy

John Doerr, Vecenergy

Steve Barker, Airlines for America

Mark Bourdeau, United Airlines

Grant Smith, Burns and McDonnell

Don Conrad, Corrpro Companies

Karl Overman, HCNA LLC

Charles Fenton, HCNA LLC

Erik Nakutariaus, Port Authority of NY and NJ

Tom Gray, NM Env Dept

Cindy Gray, Souder, Miller, and Assoc.

Weston Bennett, ASIG-ANC

Dan Carrington, GOAA

Matt Stevens, Servisair

Chris Basher, MN Pollution Control Agency

William White, Seaport Canaveral

Mike Kennell, ASIG-ANC

John Currier, Currier and Company, Inc.

Alfred Reid, Broward County Environmental Protect.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50359-50360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20121]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 199

[DOD-2011-HA-0136]
RIN 0720-AB56

Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services 
(CHAMPUS); TRICARE Uniform Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) 
Benefit--Prime Enrollment Fee Exemption for Survivors of Active Duty 
Deceased Sponsors and Medically Retired Uniformed Services Members and 
Their Dependents; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Thursday, August 8, 2013 (78 FR 48366-48367), the 
Department of Defense published a proposed rule titled ``Civilian 
Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); TRICARE 
Uniform Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) Benefit--Prime Enrollment 
Fee Exemption for Survivors of Active Duty Deceased Sponsors and 
Medically Retired Uniformed Services

[[Page 50360]]

Members and Their Dependents.'' Subsequent to the publication of the 
proposed rule in the Federal Register, DoD discovered that an identical 
proposed rule published in the Federal Register on Friday, June 7, 2013 
(78 FR 34292-34293). DoD is hereby withdrawing the proposed rule that 
published in the Federal Register on Thursday, August 8, 2013.

DATES: As of August 19, 2013 the proposed rule published August 8, 2013 
(78 FR 48366-48367), is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

    Dated: August 14, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-20121 Filed 8-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
From: Bloomberg, David E.

To: Aburano, Douglas

Cc: Asselmeier, Buzz; Doty, Edward; Panos, Christos

Subject: PM Inventory Supplement

Date: Monday, May 06, 2013 3:33:16 PM

Attachments: St. Louis winsum_IL cy 2007.xlsx

Chicago winsum_IL cy 2007.xlsx

winsum__allstates.state.2005.csv

winsum__allstates.state.2007.csv

winsum__allstates.state.2018.csv

Doug,

Please accept the attached inventory files from LADCO as our official numbers to meet the

comprehensive emissions inventory requirement of the Clean Air Act as it applies to

ammonia and VOCs for PM2.5 for Illinois.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.

- David
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than May 14, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland**                     (Nadine Wallman, Vice President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:                

*1. The John M. St. Clair, Jr. Trust, and Kathy D. Samples, as Trustee*, both of Irvine, Kentucky; to retain voting shares of Citizens Guaranty Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Citizens Guaranty Bank, both of Irvine, Kentucky.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 24, 2009.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-9757 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Attachment 2 

1995 NPTS Time of Day, Trip and Speed Analysis 

(Available upon request)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      36,847,000
<SECURITIES>                                74,882,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              129,416,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                12,948,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           332,660,000
<PP&E>                                     336,141,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              83,391,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,088,551,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      353,168,000
<BONDS>                                    280,721,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 301,915,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,088,551,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           956,462,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              913,959,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,106,000<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,344,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             25,053,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,340,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         16,713,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,713,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
<FN>
<F1>Impairment and Other Costs
</FN>


</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-19-00405-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

KYLE KIRBY, Appellant,

v.

ROGER BUERGNER, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, Kyle Kirby, appealed a judgment entered by the County Court at Law 

No. 1 of Victoria County, Texas. On September 9, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified 

appellant, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would 

dismiss this appeal unless the $205.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 
2

Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $205.00 filing fee. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to pay 

the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b),(c). 

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

JAIME TIJERINA,

Justice

Delivered and filed the

10th day of October, 2019
Order entered November 7, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00034-CR

ANTUAN SPENCER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-53001-Y

ORDER

By order dated October 10, 2016, we noted the reporter’s record, originally due April 19, 

2016, had not been filed despite our having abated the case for a hearing and having repeatedly 

ordered the record filed. We ordered court reporter Vearneas Faggett to file the reporter’s record 

by October 25, 2016 and cautioned her that the failure to file the reporter’s record by the time 

specified could result in the Court utilizing its available remedies, including ordering that 

Vearneas Faggett not sit as a court reporter until she files the reporter’s record in this appeal. To 

date, Ms. Faggett has not corresponded with the Court or filed the reporter’s record.

Accordingly, we ORDER that Vearneas Faggett not sit as a court reporter until she has 

filed the reporter’s record in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Elizabeth Frizell, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; Vearneas Faggett, court reporter; the Dallas 

County Auditor’s Office; and to counsel for all parties.

 .

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 13, 2017

Order 

Clerk

October 13, 2017

156132-4(77)

MARY ANN HEGADORN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC:156132

v COA: 329508

Livingston CC: 2014-028394-AA

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

DIRECTOR,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________

DEBORAH D. TRIM, Personal Representative 

of the ESTATE OF DOROTHY LOLLAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 156133

v COA: 329511

Livingston CC: 2014-028395-AA

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

DIRECTOR,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________

ROSELYN FORD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 156134

v COA: 331242

Washtenaw CC: 15-000488-AA

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

DIRECTOR,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the joint motion of the Elder Law and Disability 

Rights Section of the State Bar of Michigan and the Michigan Chapter of the National 

Academy of Elder Law Attorneys to participate as amici curiae and to submit a brief 

amicus curiae in support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The 

amicus brief will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before October 27, 2017.
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Book Chapters 

#           International endeavor in response to global climate change      

      January 1, 2001    

No abstract available.

## Citation Information

### Contact

####               Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center          

8711 37th Street SoutheastJamestown, ND58401-7317United States

701-253-5500
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-116055 and No. 333-123707 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 26, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R)), appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K of UCN, INC. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|Salt Lake City, Utah     
|March 26, 2007
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
ALR Technologies Inc. (the “Company’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here
of (the “report”), I, Sidney Chan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 15th day
of April, 2010.








SIDNEY
      CHANSidney
      ChanChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3242 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare beneficiaries coordinated care and greater choice with regard to accessing 

hearing health services and benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

Medicare beneficiaries coordinated care and greater 

choice with regard to accessing hearing health services 

and benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Hearing 

5 Health Care Enhancement Act of 2012’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3242 IS

1 SEC. 2. ENABLING MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES TO HAVE 

2 THEIR CHOICE OF QUALIFIED HEARING 

3 HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS. 

4 Section 1861(ll)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395x(ll)(3)) is amended by inserting before the 

6 period at the end the following: ‘‘, without regard to any 

7 requirement that the individual receiving the audiology 

8 services be under the care of (or referred by) a physician 

9 or other health care practitioner or that such services are 

10 provided under the supervision of a physician or other 

11 health care practitioner’’. 

12 SEC. 3. INCLUSION OF AUDIOLOGY SERVICES AS MEDICAL 

13 SERVICES UNDER MEDICARE PART B; PAY14 MENT FOR SUCH SERVICES. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social 

16 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended— 

17 (1) in subparagraph (EE), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

18 the end; 

19 (2) in subparagraph (FF), by inserting ‘‘and’’ 

20 at the end; and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub22 paragraph: 

23 ‘‘(GG) audiology services (as defined in sub24 section (ll)(3));’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3242 IS

1 (b) PAYMENT UNDER THE PHYSICIAN FEE SCHED2 ULE.—Section 1848(j)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 

3 4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(2)(GG),’’ before ‘‘(3),’’. 

4 SEC. 4. CONSTRUCTION; EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 (a) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in the amendments 

6 made by this Act shall be construed to expand the scope 

7 of audiology services for which payment may be made 

8 under title XVIII of the Social Security Act on December 

9 31, 2012. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this Act shall take effect with respect to services furnished 

12 on or after January 1, 2013. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to
18 United States Code s. 1350

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Manulife Financial Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 19, 2015



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|/s/ Stephen B. Roder                                                        
|Stephen B. Roder Senior Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
I. Q. 

# COATOFAPPEALS. DIVISION 11 2014 ScP - 9 

## PM 9: 22 s TON BY 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHING STATE OF WASHINGTON, DIVISION II Respondent,
v. JOSEPH MADISON MCCLENNY, Appellant. No. 45245 - 6 -II

UNPUBLISHED OPINION MELNICK, J. — 

### Following abenchtrial,the courtfound Joseph Madison McClenny guilty of possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. 

### McClenny appeals his conviction 

### arguingthetrial court erred byfailing to enterwrittenfindings offactand conclusions oflaw. The State concedes error and agrees that the case should be remanded. We accept the State' s 

### concession and remand to the trial court for entry ofwritten findings offacts and conclusions of law as required by law. FACTS 

### Officers arrested Joseph Madison McClenny during a routine traffic stop after dispatch 

### confirmed avalid felony warrant for his arrest existed. Incidentto his arrest,the police searched McClenny' s person and found plastic baggies containing several needles and a white crystal substance, which tested positive for methamphetamine. The State charged McClenny with one count of possession of methamphetamine.45245 -6 -II 

### McClenny waived his rights to ajury trial and moved for suppression of evidence under CrR 3. 5. 

### The trial court conducted the CrR 3. 5 hearing and bench trial in one hearing. The court denied McClenny' s CrR 3. 5 motion and convicted him as charged. However, the trial court did not enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law for either the trial or the confession 

### hearing. ANALYSIS 

### The trial court is required to enterwritten findings offact and conclusions oflawfollowing a bench trial. CrR 6. 1( d). 

### Additionally, it isthe dutyofthe court in aconfession hearing to record and set forth in writing "( 1) the undisputed facts; ( 2) the disputed facts; ( 3) conclusions as to the disputed facts; and ( 4) conclusion as to whether the statement is admissible and the reasons therefor." CrR 3. 5( c). These requirements for written findings and conclusions facilitate the appellate review process. State v. Head, 136 Wn.2d 619, 622, 964 P. 2d 1187 ( 1998). A court' s oral opinion "' has
no formal or binding effect ' 

### until it is formally incorporated in written findings, conclusions, and 

### judgment. Head, 136 Wn.2d at 622 (quoting State v. Mallory, 69 Wn.2d 532, 533, 419 P.2d 324 1966)). The trial court' s failure to follow the above - cited rules is remand. Head, 136 Wn.2d at 623.

245245 -6 -II Because the trial court did not enter findings offact and conclusions of law after either the 

### bench trial orthe CrR 3. 5 hearing, we accept the State' s concession and remand to the trial court with directions that it enter written findings offact and conclusions of law as required. 

### A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordancewith RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

We concur: