J

- S72004

- 16

_____________________________ *Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. JODY GORDON Appellant No. 1959 MDA 2015

Appeal from the PCRA Order October 23 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of York County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 67

- CR

- 0007467

- 2013

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., DUBOW, J., and STRASSBURGER, J.* JUDGMENT ORDER BY GANTMAN, P.J.: FILED DECEMBER 08, 2016 Appellant, Jody Gordon, appeals from the order entered in the York County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541

- 9546. On July 9, 2014, Appellant pled guilty to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. The court sentenced Appellant on July 29, 2014, to
two
- and

- one - half (21⁄2) to five (5) years’ incarceration. On February 5, 2015, Appellant file d a timely pro se PCRA petition, and he filed an amended petition on July 31, 2015. The PCRA court subsequently appointed counsel. Following a hearing, the court denied Appellant’s PCRA petition on October 23, 2015. Appellant filed a timely notice of ap peal on November 9, 2015, and complied with the court’s order to file a concise statement of errorsJ

- S72004

- 16

- 2

-

complained of on appeal per Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). Preliminarily, appellate counsel has filed a Turner / Finley 1 brief and a petition to withdraw as counsel. B efore counsel can be permitted to withdraw from representing a petitioner under the PCRA , Pennsylvania law requires counsel to file a “no

- merit” brief or letter pursuant to Turner and Finley

. Commonwealth v. Karanicolas , 836 A.2d 940 (Pa.Super. 2003).

[C] ounsel must...submit a “no

- merit” letter to the [PCRA] court, or brief on appeal to this Court, detailing the nature and extent of counsel’s diligent review of the case, listing the issues which the petitioner wants to have reviewed, explaining why and ho w those issues lack merit , and requesting permission to withdraw. Counsel must also send to the petitioner: (1) a copy of the “no

- merit” letter/brief; (2) a copy of counsel's petition to withdraw; and (3) a statement advising petitioner of the right to pr oceed pro se or by new counsel. If counsel fails to satisfy the foregoing technical prerequisites of Turner/Finley , the court will not reach the merits of the underlying claims but, rather, will merely deny counsel's request to withdraw. Upon doing so, t he court will then take appropriate steps, such as directing counsel to file a proper Turner/Finley request or an advocate’s brief. Commonwealth v. Wrecks , 931 A.2d 717, 721 (Pa.Super. 2007) (internal citations omitted) (emphasis added). Instantly, appel late counsel’s
Turner / Finley brief addresses only one issue on appeal (trial counsel’s alleged ineffective assistance for promising Appellant a concurrent sentence

____________________________________________ 1 Commonwealth v. Turner , 518 Pa. 49 1, 544 A.2d 927 (1988) and Commonwealth v. Finley , 550 A.2d 213 (Pa.Super. 1988) ( en banc )

.J

- S72004

- 16

- 3

-

if he pled guilty) and explains why that issue lacks merit. Counsel notified Appellant of c ounsel’s request to withdraw and properly advised Appellant regarding his rights. In Appellant’s pro se response, he asserts counsel failed to address other issues raised in Appellant’s PCRA petition, which Appellant wanted to advance on appeal, i.e. , tri al counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness for failing to (1) move for dismissal of the charges based on “prejudicial pre

- arrest delay”; (2) provide Appellant with pre

- trial discovery material; (3) advise Appellant on the availability of an alibi defense; (4) ch allenge Appellant’s alleged mandatory minimum sentence; and (5) file a post
- sentence motion and/or direct appeal on Appellant’s behalf. ( See Appellant’s pro se brief at 9). Appellate counsel did not list those issues in his Turner/Finley brief and explai n why they lack merit. Therefore, counsel failed to comply with the technical requirements of Turner/Finley

. Accordingly, we deny counsel’s petition to withdraw. See Wrecks, supra

. Instead, we remand and direct counsel to file (1) an advocate’s brief, or (2) a compliant Turner/Finley brief, additionally addressing the other issues enumerated in Appellant’s current pro se response, with an accompanying petition to withdraw. Counsel must file the amended brief within thirty (30) days of the filing date o f this decision. The Commonwealth shall then have thirty (30) days to file an answer brief or notify this Court that it does not intend to file one. If counsel files an amended Turner/Finley brief, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the date coun sel files the brief toJ

- S72004

- 16

- 4

-

file an amended pro se response, strictly limited to those issues previously raised and properly preserved. Case remanded with instructions. Panel jurisdiction is retained.