alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion filed July 30 , 2 009



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

___________ 

### No. 1 1- 09 -0 02 18 -CV

____ ____ __ DA VID S. SHA HEEN , A ppellant

V. LU CKIE’ S A UTO & T RU CK REP AIR , IN C. , A ppellee

On App eal from the 40th Distric t Court

Elli s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 76793

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N David S. Shaheen a

ppeals fr om the trial court’s take-nothing judgme nt. We dism iss for want of jurisdiction. Th e tr ia l c ou rt

sig ne d it s ju dg me nt o n F e br ua ry 11 , 2 00 9. Sha

he e n ti me ly

fi le d b oth a re qu e st for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law and a motion for new t rial. I n order to timely perf ect a n appea l pursuant to T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1, the not ice of appea l was due to be filed with the c lerk of t h e t r i a l c o u rt o n o r b e f

o r e M a y 1 2 , 2 0 0 9 ( n i n e t y d a y s a f t e r t h e d a t e t h e j u d g m e n tw a s s i g n e d )

. In order to ext end the time for

filing the notice of appea l, both the notice of appea l a nd the motion for2

extension of tim e should ha ve been filed on or befor e May 27, 2009 (fifte en day s after the orig inal due date ). T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3. Shaheen f iled the not ice of appea l on J une 2, 2009. Shaheen filed a mot ion for ex tension of time to file his notice of appeal on Jul y 6, 2009. Neither

the notice of

appea l nor the motion meet the time require ments of Rule 26.3. I n both his mot ion a

nd his c ertificate of service on his notice of appe al, Shahee n states that he mailed his notice of appea l on May 29, 2009, sevente en day s afte r the orig inal d u e d ate. There fore , we a

re una ble t o apply the mail box provision of T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.2 to consider the notice of appe al “f

iled” as of

the date of

mai l i n g. Be ca u s e t he notice of appea l was not filed during the Rule 26.3 fiftee n-day

time frame , we a

re una ble to imply

the timely

filing of the m otion under the provisions of Verburgt v. Dorne r , 959 S.W .2d 615 (Tex. 1997). Absent complianc e with Rules 26.1 and 26.3, the a ppellate jurisdiction of this court is not invoked. Shahee n’s motion for extension of time to f ile his notice of appe al is overr uled, and the appea l is dism issed for wa nt of jurisdiction.

PER C URI AM

J uly 30, 2009 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , a n d

S t r a n g e , J.
# Current and Historical Prices

All prices are in US$ per troy oz and are provided for information purposes only. Year: 2009 Month: March View Data Johnson Matthey Base Prices Mon Mar 29 09:30 New York Time PLATINUM 1620 PALLADIUM 475 RHODIUM 2550 IRIDIUM 510 RUTHENIUM 190

March 2009 Daily Prices Platinum Palladium Rhodium March 2009 Asia Europe USA Asia Europe USA Asia Europe USA Mon 2 1083 1094 1094 199 200 200 1200 1200 1200 Tue 3 1055 1054 1050 194 194 192 1200 1200 1200 Wed 4 1044 1045 1045 195 194 194 1200 1200 1200 Thu 5 1052 1057 1057 200 200 200 1200 1200 1200 Fri 6 1067 1075 1075 200 200 204 1200 1200 1200 Mon 9 1079 1073 1068 204 203 199 1200 1200 1200 Tue 10 1056 1046 1051 198 198 198 1200 1200 1175 Wed 11 1038 1055 1055 198 198 198 1175 1175 1175 Thu 12 1055 1050 1053 198 198 198 1175 1175 1175 Fri 13 1053 1055 1055 198 198 198 1175 1175 1175 Mon 16 1056 1069 1060 198 200 200 1175 1175 1175 Tue 17 1063 1058 1049 200 200 199 1175 1175 1150 Wed 18 1053 1056 1049 197 197 196 1150 1150 1150 Thu 19 1061 1059 1095 201 200 208 1150 1125 1125 Fri 20 1120 1120 1122 207 207 207 1125 1125 1125 Mon 23 1103 1114 1130 209 208 208 1125 1125 1125 Tue 24 1123 1130 1119 212 214 210 1125 1125 1125 Wed 25 1119 1125 1120 208 208 207 1125 1150 1150 Thu 26 1131 1143 1165 215 217 225 1150 1150 1175 Fri 27 1149 1153 1143 224 223 223 1175 1175 1175 Mon 30 1137 1135 1125 220 217 215 1175 1175 1175 Tue 31 1122 1133 1129 215 215 215 1175 1175 1175 Month Average 1082.68 1086.32 1086.77 204.09 204.05 204.27 1170.45 1170. 45 1169.32 

# Page 1 of 2 Platinum today: Current and Historical Prices

3/29/2010 http://www.platinum.matthey.com/cgi

- bin/dynamic.pl?year=2009&month=March&templa
...1. The sum of the daily prices is divided by the num ber of prices set during that day to give a daily a verage

2. The daily averages are added together and divided by the number of days on which prices were set dur ing the month
Subscribe to our RSS Feed Month Average for all time zones Platinum Palladium Rh odium Iridium Ruthenium March 2009 1085.08 204.25 1169.81 425.00 80.00
Previous Month Next Month

Daily prices are the first prices in each time zone.
Monthly average prices are the averages of all pric es set in all time zones during the month, calculat ed as follows: 

# Page 2 of 2 Platinum today: Current and Historical Prices

3/29/2010 http://www.platinum.matthey.com/cgi

- bin/dynamic.pl?year=2009&month=March&templa
...
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. EDISON SHINO, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-10208

D.C . No. 1:03-c r-05453-LJO M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for theEa ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Lawre nc e J. O’ Ne ill, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 26, 2016 ** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , C ANB Y, a n d C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s. Edison Shino a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing his motion for a se nte nc e re duc t i on unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2). W e hav e jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a

nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED AUG 01 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Shino c onte nds tha t he is e ntitle d to a se nte nc e re duc t ion unde r Am e ndm e nt 782 to theSe nte nc ing Guide line s. W e re vie w de novo whe the r a distric t c o urt ha d a uthority to m odify

a se nte nc e unde r se c tion 3582(c )(2). Se eUnite d State s v . W ate rs , 771 F.3d 679, 680 (9th C ir. 2014). As the distric t c ourt c orre c tly c onc lude d, e v e n a ssuming tha t Am e ndm e nt 782 re duc e d Shino’ s Guide line s ra nge to 210-262 months, Shino is ine ligiblefor a se nte nc e re duc tion be c a

u se his se nte nc e is a lre a dy

be low the m inim

um of tha t ra nge . Se eU.S.S.G. § 1B 1 .10(b)(2)(A) (“ [T] he c ourt sha ll not re duc e the de fe nda nt’ s te rm of im prisonm e nt unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2) and this policy sta te m e nt to a

te rm tha t is le s s tha n the m inim

um of the am e nde d guide l ine range .” ). M ore ove r, a s Shino a c knowle dge s, his a

rgum e nt tha

t a pply ing se c tion 1B 1.10(b)(2)(A) to his c a se viola te s theEx Post Fa c to C la

use is fore c l ose d by

our de c ision in W

ate rs . Se e W ate rs , 771 F.3d a

t 681. W e de c line to c onside r Shino’ s a rgum e nt, ra ise d for the first tim e in his re ply brie f, tha t W ate rs is distinguisha

ble . Se ePadge tt v . W

r ight , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 1 0 2 0 8 2
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Ian
Long, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.




Date:
      June 12, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Ian LongName:
        Ian LongTitle: Chief Executive
      Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,519,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,426,771
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,639,094)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,660,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,584,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,540,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,660,588
<SALES>                                        648,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               700,539
<CGS>                                          312,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  426,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               125,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,983
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Herbert MCELROY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-982

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5


                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

         THIS STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT is made to be effective as of May 8, 2003,
between SulphCo, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "COMPANY"), and Patrick E. Lacy
(the "OPTIONEE").

         THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. OPTION GRANT. The Company hereby grants to the Optionee an option (the
"OPTION") to purchase the number of shares of the Company's common stock (the
"SHARES"), for an exercise price per share (the "OPTION PRICE") and based upon a
Grant Date, all as set forth below:

                         Shares under option: 100,000
                         Option Price per Share: $0.35
                         Grant Date: May 8, 2003
                         Expiry Date: May 8, 2006

         The Option granted hereunder is a nonstatutory or nonqualified option
for tax purposes.

2. STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS. No rights or privileges of a stockholder in the Company
are conferred by reason of the granting of the Option. Optionee will not become
a stockholder in the Company with respect to the Shares unless and until the
Option has been properly exercised and the Option Price fully paid as to the
portion of the Option exercised.

3. TERMINATION. This Option will expire, unless previously exercised in full, on
the Expiry Date, May 8, 2006.

4. S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT/EXERCISE. Upon the Optionee's request, the Company
will agree to register the Shares on a Form S-8 registration statement and shall
keep the registration statement in effect.

5. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement sets forth the complete agreement of the
parties concerning the subject matter hereof, superseding all prior agreements,
negotiations and understandings. This Agreement will be governed by the
substantive law of the State of Nevada, and may be executed in counterparts.

         The parties hereby have entered into this Agreement as of the date set
forth above.

                                                 "COMPANY"

                                                 SulphCo, Inc.


                                                 By:___________________________
                                                 Title:________________________


                                                 "OPTIONEE"

                                                 ______________________________
                                                 Patrick E. Lacy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001096637
<NAME> GENE CELL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         154,178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,178
<PP&E>                                         101,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,778
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,616
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,258
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               160,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (162,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (162,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (162,048)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 18-1347

INDUSTRIA LECHERA DE PUERTO RICO, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RAMÓN GONZÁLEZ BEIRÓ in his official capacity as ACTING 

SECRETARY OF THE PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JORGE 

CAMPOS MERCED, in his official capacity as ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 

PUERTO RICO MILK INDUSTRY REGULATORY OFFICE,

Defendants-Appellees, and

SUIZA DAIRY, CORP.; VAQUERÍA TRES MONJITAS, INC.,

Intervenor-Defendants, Intervenor-Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 1, 2021, is amended 

as follows:

On page 12, line 17, replace "reign" with "rein"
Exhibit 99.4 - Administrative Report of the Trust


                              Administrative Report
                                       for
            Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2004-006 (the "Trust")

                           Payment Date April 15, 2005
                             CUSIP Number 41659FAE4

(i)   the amount received by the Indenture Trustee from Hartford Life Insurance
      Company ("Hartford Life") as of the payment date in respect of the
      principal, interest and premium, if any, on Funding Agreement No. 404006
      (the "Funding Agreement") issued by Hartford Life Insurance Company
      ("Hartford Life").

               --------------- ---------------------------------
               Interest:       $ 8,530.50
               --------------- ---------------------------------
               Principal:      $ 0.00
               --------------- ---------------------------------

(ii)  the amount of payment on such Payment Date to holders allocable to
      principal and interest on the notes of the Trust.

               --------------- ---------------------------------
               Interest:       $ 8,530.50
               --------------- ---------------------------------
               Principal:      $ 0.00
               --------------- ---------------------------------

(iii) the aggregate stated principal amount of the Funding Agreement, the
      current interest rate or rates thereon at the close of business on such
      Payment Date, and the current rating assigned to the Funding Agreement.

       ------------------------------- ---------------------------------
       Aggregate Principal Amount:     $ 363,015.00
       ------------------------------- ---------------------------------
       Interest Rate:                  4.70%
       ------------------------------- ---------------------------------

                                    Ratings:
                                           Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                           Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

(iv)  the aggregate principal balance of the notes of the Trust at the close of
      business on such Payment Date and the current rating assigned to such
      notes.

                                    Aggregate Principal Amount: $363,000.00
                                    Ratings:
                                           Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                           Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-


AMACAR Pacific Corp., as administrator of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust
2004-006

By:  /s/  Evelyn Echevarria
     --------------------------------------
     Name:  Evelyn Echevarria
     Title:  Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, May 22, 2009.

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9-9703 Filed 4-24-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3238 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community based outpatient 

clinic in Mansfield, Ohio, as the David F. Winder Department of Veterans Affairs Community Based Outpatient Clinic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community 

based outpatient clinic in Mansfield, Ohio, as the David 

F. Winder Department of Veterans Affairs Community 

Based Outpatient Clinic, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress makes the following findings: 

5 (1) David F. Winder, was born on August 10, 

6 1946, in Edinboro, Pennsylvania. 

7 (2) David F. Winder served as a Private First 

8 Class in the United States Army, enlisting in ColumVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:55 May 29, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3238.IS S3238

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3238 IS

1 bus, Ohio, in 1968. His service in the Army ended 

2 in May 1970. 

3 (3) David F. Winder was awarded the Medal of 

4 Honor, the highest honor in the United States 

5 awarded for valor to members of the Armed Forces, 

6 for his actions during the ambush of his company, 

7 on May 13, 1970, in the Republic of Vietnam for 

8 conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of 

9 his life above and beyond the call of duty as a senior 

10 medical aidman with Company A, 3rd Battalion, 1st 

11 Infantry Regiment, 11th Infantry Brigade, Americal 

12 Division. 

13 (4) Unarmed, PFC Winder proceeded to crawl 

14 over 100 meters of open, bullet swept terrain to 

15 treat the 2 different wounded soldiers while suf16 fering 2 serious wounds himself in the process. He 

17 was mortally wounded for the third and final time 

18 when closing to within 30 feet of a third soldier. 

19 (5) PFC Winder was laid to rest in Mansfield 

20 Memorial Park. 

21 SEC. 2. DAVID F. WINDER DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF22 FAIRS COMMUNITY BASED OUTPATIENT 

23 CLINIC. 

24 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af25 fairs community based outpatient clinic located in MansVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:55 May 29, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3238.IS S3238

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3238 IS

1 field, Ohio, shall after the date of the enactment of this 

2 Act be known and designated as the ‘‘David F. Winder 

3 Department of Veterans Affairs Community Based Out4 patient Clinic’’. 

5 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg6 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

7 States to the Department of Veterans Affairs community 

8 based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the David F. Winder De10 partment of Veterans Affairs Community Based Out11 patient Clinic. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
RECORD OF COMMUNICATION

TELEPHONE CALL

DATE: August 1, 2012

SUBJECT: California DOGGR- Reinjection standards for produced water

FROM: Nicole Law – EPA Region IX, Rules Office

TO: Steve Fields – California Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources, District 2

(805) 654-4761

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION:

1. There are no federal standards for VOC content in reinjected wastewater.

2. The state standards for reinjection are for hazardous materials.

3. Oil production fluid is exempt under federal (RCRA) requirements.

4. The Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources has reinjection standards for TDS (total 

dissolved solids).