alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv4w52



 





Exhibit
4.52




Shanghai Commercial Bank LTD




Shenzhen Branch




26/F, Shenzhen International Finance Mansion, 2022 Jianshe Road, Shenzhen

Tel: (755) 82200319 Fax: (755) 82204964




Reference Number: SZ0511023/BT

Date: Dec. 31, 2007




Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd

Block A, B, C, D, Sanyidui Industrial Zone, Zhoushi Road, Jiuwei Village, 

Xixiang Town, Bao’an
District, Shenzhen




Addressee: Mr. Colin Yoeh / Mr. Thomas Lai




Dear Sir or Madam:




Complementation Agreement: 

Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd (“Borrower”)



According to the request from your company, Shanghai Commercial Bank Shenzhen Branch (hereinafter
referred to as “the Bank”) agreeably inform you that term(s) of the Letter of Credit Extension for
Bank Loans Accommodation (Reference No.: SZ0511023/BT) has been modified as follows:




Security and/or guaranty





	þ	 	The Contract of Guaranty in the standard format of the Bank,
with security money Five Million USD only, signed by Nam Tai
Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. in cordiality.





     The rest terms remain unchanged.


This written complementation agreement is an undivided integral part of the Letter of Credit
Extension for Bank Loans Accommodation (Reference No.: SZ0511023/BT). The Complementation Agreement
and the Letter of Credit Extension are equally valid. The Complementation Agreement will go into
effect from the date of being signed and submitted to the Bank by the Borrower.



If there is any questions, please contact Mr. Wang Dongliang, who is in charge of the affair, at
86-755-82227606.




 









 








Shanghai Commercial Bank LTD




Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd. Shenzhen Branch




/s/ Yao Jinxiong /s/ Zheng Lifen [Chop of Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd.]
                                         (Official Seal)

Name of Authorized Signer: Yao Jinxiong / Zheng Lifen




Position: Vice President of the Bank / Operation Director




The Borrower and guarantor agree to accept all terms and conditions of this letter.




Borrower: Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.(Official Seal)




/s/ [signature illegible]




                                                            

Name of Legal Representative/Authorized Representative

[

[In Chinese]

Position:




[In Chinese]

Date:

Guarantor:

Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd




For and on behalf of

NAM TAI ELECTRONIC & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS LIMITED




/s/ [signature illegible]

(Signature)

Authorized Signature               

Name of Legal Representative/Authorized Representative

[In Chinese]

Position:

[In Chinese]

Date:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET, THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,999
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,999)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (147,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (147,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, May 15, 2009.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-9701 Filed 4-24-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
# Third District Court of Appeal
Stat e of Florida Opinion filed August 7, 2024. Not final unti l dispositi on of timely filed mot ion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D24-0065 Lower Tribunal No. 21 -1 0568 CC

________________ 

### The Wellness Cent er of L ondon Square, Inc. ,

Appellant,

vs. 

### DH L Express (USA) , Inc. ,

Appellee.

An Appe al from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Linda Singer Stein, Judge. Ramsaran Law Group , and Jerome Ramsaran , for appellant. Fowler White Burnett, P.A., and Ana E. Tovar , for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and GORDO , JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Appellant, The Wellness Center of London Square, Inc. (“Wellness Center”), appeals a December 13, 2023 final judgment of the county court awarding attorney’s fees and costs to appellee, DHL Express (USA), Inc. (“DHL”), pursuant to section 57.105(1) of the Florida Statutes (2022). We affirm in part and reverse in part. In its appeal, Wellness Center does not challenge the trial court’s finding of DHL’s entitlement to attorney’s fees but disputes only the $23,803.00 fee amount awarded by the court. Because Wellness Center has not provided us a transcript of the evidentiary hearing where the lower court addressed attorney’s fees, and the face of the record reveals no error in the court’s calculation of the fee amount awarded to DHL, we must affirm the fee award. See Myret, LLC v. Gr p. LX, Inc. , 245 So. 3d 1024, 1024 (Fla. 3 d D CA 2018) (“Myret disputes the amount of the fees awarded. However, where, as here, no transcript of the hearing where the amount of the fees was addressed has been provided, and the judgment is not fundamentally erroneous on its face, we must affirm.”). Wellness Center also challenges the trial court’s $578.55 costs award. Because “nothing in the text of section 57.105(1) provides for the award of costs,” Law Offices of Borell, P.A. v. Acevedo , 322 So. 3d 1218, 1219 (Fla.3

3d DCA 2021), we reverse that portion of the December 13, 2023 final judgment awarding costs to DHL. Id. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions to strike the award of costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6676

WILLIAM H. ROGERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH L. HAMILTON, Acting Secretary of Department of Correction,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-98-242-5-F)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William H. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William H. Rogers seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Rogers v. Hamilton, No. CA-98-242-5-F

(E.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EX-10.38



 Exhibit 10.38 

Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements 

In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report, EnPro Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) has the following compensation arrangements with its directors and named executive officers. 
 Compensation
Arrangements for Directors 
 The Company has an arrangement to pay non-employee members of the Company’s board of
directors compensation for their service on the board. Effective for 2012, each non-employee member of the Company’s board of directors receives an annual retainer of $150,000, $75,000 of which is paid in cash and $75,000 of which is paid in
phantom shares of our common stock upon the director’s termination of service as a director. The non-executive chairman of the board receives an additional quarterly fee of $10,000 for his service in that capacity and for his service as
chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committee receives an additional annual fee of $8,000, and the chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee receives an annual
fee of $6,000. 
 Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers 

The Company’s chief executive officer and its four other most highly compensated executive officers based on 2011 base salaries and
bonuses (such five individuals, the “named executive officers”), are all “at-will” employees who serve at the pleasure of the board of directors. The board of directors sets the annual base salary for each of the named executive
officers and has the discretion to change the salary of any of the officers at any time. Effective for 2012, the annual base salaries for the named executive officers are as follows: 

 

					
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	Base Salary	 
		
	 Stephen E. Macadam
	  	$	825,000	  
	 Alexander W. Pease
	  	$	375,000	  
	 Richard L. Magee
	  	$	330,000	  
	 J. Milton Childress II
	  	$	270,000	  
	 Robert P. McKinney
	  	$	237,000
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-15-00405-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 442nd District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-30982-211

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

CROSS TIMBERS WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION, F/K/A BARTONVILLE 

WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

RICHARD K. ARMEY; SUSAN D. ARMEY; RICHARD VERA; KRYSTAL VERA;

TIMOTHY LANDRUM AND SHAWN LANDRUM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

TRUSTEES AND BENEFICIARIES OF THE LANDRUM FAMILY TRUST; JAMES 

BALL AND SHIRLEY BALL; AND THE TOWN OF BARTONVILLE, Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” 

Because the parties have settled all matters in the appeal, it is the court’s 

opinion that the motion should be granted. We therefore reverse the trial court’s 

judgment without reference to the merits and remand to the trial court for entry of 

judgment consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: April 2, 2020
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3071 

To suspend temporarily the duty on manganese ferrite carrier covered with 

acrylic resin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on manganese ferrite 

carrier covered with acrylic resin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MANGANESE FERRITE CARRIER COVERED 

4 WITH ACRYLIC RESIN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Manganese ferrite carrier 

with acrylic resin (provided 

for in subheading 

3707.90.32) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3071 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 150/27 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 150 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5927 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 150

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5927 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2016/C 150/1 | Opinion No 1/2016 (pursuant to Article 325, TFEU) concerning a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards the secretariat of the Supervisory Committee of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2016/C 150/1

Opinion No 1/2016 (pursuant to Article 325, TFEU) concerning a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, as regards the secretariat of the Supervisory Committee of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)

(pursuant to Article 325, TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3275 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3275

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the publicly 
   traded partnership ownership structure to energy power generation 
       projects and transportation fuels, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2012

    Mr. Coons (for himself, Mr. Moran, Mr. Tester, Mr. Franken, Ms. 
 Klobuchar, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the publicly 
   traded partnership ownership structure to energy power generation 
       projects and transportation fuels, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Master Limited Partnerships Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNERSHIP OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE TO 
              ENERGY POWER GENERATION PROJECTS AND TRANSPORTATION 
              FUELS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 7704(d)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``, industrial 
source carbon dioxide,'' and all that follows and inserting ``or of any 
industrial source carbon dioxide; or the generation, storage, or 
transmission to the electrical grid of electric power exclusively 
utilizing any resource described in section 45(c)(1) or energy property 
described in section 48, or the accepting or processing of such 
resource or property for such utilization; or the generation or storage 
of thermal power exclusively utilizing any such resource or property; 
or the transportation or storage of any fuel described in subsection 
(b), (c), (d), or (e) of section 6426; or the production for sale by 
the taxpayer, the transportation, or the storage of any renewable fuel 
described in section 211(o)(1)(J) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7545(o)(1)(J)),''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years 
ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45467

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

RONALD LEE GLAZIER ,
Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: June 25, 2018
Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Melissa Moody , District Judge.
Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lo ri A. F l eming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________ PER CURIAM
Ronald Lee Glazier pleaded guilty to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs (one felony conviction within fifteen years) , Idaho Code § § 18

- 8004, 8005(9), and possession of a controlled subst ance, I.C. § 37

- 2732(c)

. For the driving under t he influence charge , the district court imposed a unified t en

- year sentence, with five years
determinate
, and for the possession of a controlled substance charge , the district court imposed
an indeterminate five

- year sentence to run consecutively

. Glazier filed an I.C.R. 35 motion,
which the district court denied. Glazier appeals. A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,
addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d2 23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In presenting an I.C.R. 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or a dditional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the
motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the record, including any new information submitted with Glazier ’s I.C.R. 35 moti on, we conclude no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Glazier ’s
I.C.R. 35 motion is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40897

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODOLFO SANTIAGO PEREZ-RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:09-CR-587-1

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodolfo Santiago

Perez-Rivera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Perez-Rivera has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40897 Document: 00511148927 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
EXHIBIT 13.2











Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to


Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











I, Monique van Oord, Chief Financial Officer of Linux Gold Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:






1.
The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the year ended February 28, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and






2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Linux Gold Corp.




Richmond, BC Canada




by: /s/ Monique van Oord




September 10, 2009




Monique van Oord


Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Holley
Performance Products Inc. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas W. Tomlinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ THOMAS W. TOMLINSON                                       | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                              | 
|Thomas W. Tomlinson  Chief Financial Officer  August 13, 2003 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Holley Performance Products Inc. and will be retained by Holley
Performance Products Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.