alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>

Exhibit 32.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       AND THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Christine Koenemann, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of Westbridge Research Group (the "Registrant"), does hereby certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to
                  which this certificate is attached as an exhibit (the
                  "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m), as amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Westbridge Research Group and will be retained by Westbridge
Research Group and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissions or its
staff upon request.



Date: October 15, 2008                     By: /s/ Christine Koenemann
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Christine Koenemann
                                               Principal Executive Officer
                                               Principal Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

March 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 135933 (3) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices CARLETUS WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 135933 AGC: 3121/07 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISION,

Defendant.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $26.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $349.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 25, 2008
Clerk
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 17-PDB-107

NO. 2018-OB-0430

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Leave to appeal denied.
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**UNDER
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
      States Code)**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Zhong Ya Li, the principal financial officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 18, 2008





/s/
                Zhong Ya LiZhong
                Ya Li, Principal Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 2 9 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk July 2 9 , 2016

15 4 023 (2 4 )

MICHAEL SULLIVAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 15 4023

v COA: 3 30543

Livingston CC: 1 4

- 00 6162

- D O

DENISE SULLIVAN

, Defendant

- Appellant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for filing h is answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 9 , 2016

.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GFR  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Richard Pierce, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Richard Pierce
Richard Pierce
CEO, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: December 28, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00263

- CV

In the Interest of H.O. , a Child

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- EM5

- 01553 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellee Carlos Guerrero recover his costs of appeal from Appellant Grisel da Ortiz.

SIGNED May 20, 2015.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
Letter from President and C.E.O.



 EXHIBIT 10(r)(r) 

[Letterhead of EMCOR Group, Inc.] 
  

			
	  
	 	
	  
	 	
	  
	 	

 Dear
                                        :

 As a holder of one or more non-qualified stock options granted to you by EMCOR Group, Inc. (the “Company”) to
purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, please be advised that the Company has amended those stock options so as to permit you, at your discretion, to satisfy the exercise price of each such stock option, by a “net exercise”
arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of shares of Company common stock that would otherwise be issued upon exercise of such stock option by a number of whole shares having a fair market value equal to the sum of the
aggregate exercise price of such stock option, and such fair market value of a share of Company common stock shall be the closing price of a share on the date such stock option is exercised (or if the Company common stock is not traded on such date,
the most recent date on which such common stock was traded). 
  

							
		 		 	Very truly yours,
				
	Dated as of October 22, 2011	 		 	By	 	  

		 		 		 	Anthony J. Guzzi
		 		 		 	President and
		 		 		 	Chief Executive Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3245 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 3, 2012 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To extend by 3 years the authorization of the EB–5 Regional 

Center Program, the E–Verify Program, the Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program, and the 

Conrad State 30 J–1 Visa Waiver Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 3245 RFH

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF EB–5 REGIONAL CEN2 TER PROGRAM. 

3 Section 610 of the Departments of Commerce, Jus4 tice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Ap5 propriations Act, 1993 (8 U.S.C. 1153 note) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘pilot’’ each place such term ap8 pears; and 

9 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘September 

10 30, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 

11 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF E–VERIFY. 

12 Section 401(b) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and 

13 Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a 

14 note) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2012’’ and 

15 inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 

16 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF SPECIAL IMMIGRANT NON17 MINISTER RELIGIOUS WORKER PROGRAM. 

18 Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and 

19 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amend20 ed— 

21 (1) in subclause (II), by striking ‘‘September 

22 30, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’; and 

23 (2) in subclause (III), by striking ‘‘September 

24 30, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

S 3245 RFH

1 SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF CONRAD STATE 30 J–1 VISA 

2 WAIVER PROGRAM. 

3 Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Technical Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2012’’ and insert6 ing ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 

7 SEC. 5. NO AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL IDENTIFICATION 

8 CARD. 

9 Nothing in this Act may be construed to authorize 

10 the planning, testing, piloting, or development of a na11 tional identification card. 

Passed the Senate August 2, 2012. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Unassociated Document




Exhibit 4.8.32 - Electronic Catalogue (11) - Pass Window - Outline of Pass Window
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3166 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3166

    To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Yellow 175.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Yellow 175.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 175.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pigment Yellow 175) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Compensation Committee Member Retention Agreement with Alrene Morris



 EXHIBIT 10.25 
 

 
 October 24, 2007 
 Arlene Morris 
 [Address] 
 Re:    Retention as member of Compensation Committee 
 Dear Ms. Morris: 
 This letter will
confirm your retention as a member of the Compensation Committee with the Phenomix board of directors. 
 You will be paid $1,000.00 per meeting attended,
whether in person or via teleconference. We will endeavor to provide any materials necessary to prepare for a Compensation Committee meeting prior to such meetings. Although travel related solely to a Compensation Committee meeting is not
anticipated, Phenomix will also pay any reasonable travel related expenses incurred as a result of travel to such meetings. 
 Kindly acknowledge your
consent to the above by signing below and returning one signed original to the attention of Laura K. Shawver, Ph.D. 
 Sincerely, 
 /s/ Deepa Pakianathan 
 Deepa Pakianathan, Ph.D 
 Chair, Governance Committee 
 Cc:    Laura Shawver 
 Accepted by: 
  

	
	
	 /s/ Arlene Morris

	 Arlene Morris


 Dated:              10/25/2007             
  

 Phenomix Corporation ·5871 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 ·
San Diego, CA 92121· 858-731-5200 telephone 858-731-5226 fax
### In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________ No. 06

- 1 0

- 00 191

- CR

______________________________

IN RE: REQUEST FOR COURT OF INQUIRY

On Appeal from the 4 02 th Judicial District Court

Wood County, Texas Trial Court No. 12,169

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Ricky Williams attempts to appeal the ruling of the 402nd Judicial District Court of Wood
Count y denying his motion to convene a court of inquiry pursuant to Chapter 52 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Because the Legislature has not provided a right of appeal, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. A court of inquiry is a criminal proceeding authorized by and conducted according to Chapter 52 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 52.01

– .09 (Vernon 2006) . When a district judge, acting in his capacity as magistr ate, has probable cause to believe an offense has been committed against the laws of this state, he may request that the presiding judge of the administrative judicial district appoint a district judge to commence a court of inquiry. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 52.01(a). The appointed judge may summon and examine any witness in relation to the offense in accordance with the procedural rules established in Chapter 52. Id. If it appears from a court of inquiry an offense has been committed, the judge shall issue a warrant for the arrest of the offender as if the complaint had been made and filed. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 52.08. Implicit in the denial of a motion to convene a court of inquiry is a finding by the court presented with such a moti on that no probable cause existed that the complained

- of offense had been committed. Chapter 52 does not provide for an appeal from the judge ’ s determination. In re Court of Inquiry , No. 06

- 10

- 00171

- CR, 2010 WL 3894220 (Tex. App.

–– Texarkana Oct. 6, 2010, no pet. h.); In re3

Court of Inquiry , 148 S.W.3d 554, 555 (Tex. App.

–– El Paso 2004, no pet.). A party may appeal only that which the Legislature has authorized. Olowosuko v. State , 826 S.W.2d 940, 941 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); McCarv er v. State , 257 S.W.3d 512 (Tex. App.

–– Texarkana 2008, no pet.). In the absence of statutory authorization for an appeal from the magistrate ’ s determination made in connection with the court of inquiry, we conclude that Williams does not have a right of appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley Justice Date Submitted: October 19, 2010 Date Decided: October 20, 2010 Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globetech Environmental, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald Sampson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| By: /s/ Donald Sampson |
|------------------------|

Donald Sampson

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

March 13, 2008
# C_2004174EN.01000701.xml

| 6.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3381 — ALBA / BEKO / GRUNDIG)

(2004/C 174/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 April 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3381. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3381. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
# C_2004181EN.01000401.xml

| 14.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3401 — DANISH CROWN/FLAGSHIP FOODS)

(2004/C 181/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 June 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3401. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below: |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3401. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. For more information on how to access Celex, see ‘subscriber information’ links below:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

---
EXHIBIT 31

LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2004-6
ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES
SERIES 2004-6


I, James Guerin, a Senior Vice President of Long Beach Securities Corp.,
certify that:

l.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,
of Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-6, Asset-Backed Certificates,
Series 2004-6;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the Trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;

4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.


Dated:  March 1, 2005

By:  /s/  James Guerin
     James Guerin
     Senior Vice President