alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3308 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3308

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the furnishing of 
 benefits for homeless veterans who are women or who have dependents, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2012

  Mr. Heller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the furnishing of 
 benefits for homeless veterans who are women or who have dependents, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENTS TO BENEFITS FOR HOMELESS VETERANS WHO ARE WOMEN 
              OR HAVE DEPENDENTS.

    (a) Authorization of Per Diem Payments for Furnishing Care to 
Dependents of Certain Homeless Veterans.--Section 2012(a) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(4) Services for which a recipient of a grant under section 2011 
of this title (or an entity described in paragraph (1)) may receive per 
diem payments under this subsection may include furnishing care for a 
dependent of a homeless veteran who is under the care of such homeless 
veteran while such homeless veteran receives services from the grant 
recipient (or entity).''.
    (b) Minimum Expenditures on Grant Program for Homeless Veterans 
With Special Needs, Including Women Veterans.--
            (1) In general.--Section 2061(c) of such title is amended 
        by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) The Secretary shall ensure that the total amount of grants 
awarded under subsection (a) in a year is not less than the amount that 
is 15 percent of the total amount of grants awarded under section 2011 
of this title in that year.''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Paragraph (1) of such section is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking ``for `Medical Services' for each'' 
                and inserting the following: ``for `Medical Services'--
            ``(A) for each'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), as designated by 
                subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
            ``(B) for fiscal year 2013 and each fiscal year thereafter, 
        such sums as may be necessary for the purposes of the program 
        under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.1
Amendment dated as of September 15, 2011



 Exhibit 10.2 
 EXECUTION VERSION 
 Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. 

601 W. 26th Street 

New York, NY 10001 

September 15, 2011 
  

			
	Charles A. Koppelman	 	
	  
	 	
	  
	 	

 Dear Mr. Koppelman: 
 Reference is made to your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 26, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”) between you and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (the
“Company”). In connection with the termination of your employment effective as of September 15, 2011 (the “Date of Termination”), you and the Company have agreed to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 

1. Notwithstanding Section 9(b)(iii) and the second and third sentences in Section 9(b) of the Employment Agreement, your
Severance Payment (as defined in the Employment Agreement) will be paid as follows: 
 (i) $500,000 will be paid to you within 60
days of the Date of Termination, of which $279,449.77 will be applied in satisfaction of your withholding tax obligations with respect to accelerated vesting of your outstanding equity awards, and the balance, less applicable withholding taxes, will
be remitted to you; and 
 (ii) the balance of your Severance Payment ($966,923), less applicable withholding taxes, will be paid
to you during the second week in January 2012. 
 2. All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
effect in accordance with their terms. 
 Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing amendment to the Employment Agreement
by signing and returning a copy of this letter at your earliest convenience. 
  

			
	Sincerely,
	
	MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Daniel Taitz

	Name:	 	Daniel Taitz
	Title:	 	Chief Administrative Officer








 EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: 
 I have read and understand the above terms and conditions and by signing below, I agree to the terms and conditions of the amendment to the Employment Agreement. 

 

	
	 /s/ Charles Koppelman

	Charles A. Koppelman
	
	9/15/2011
	Date
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly report of Savi Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, George Hukriede, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Savi Media Group, Inc. and will be retained by Savi
Media Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Date:  November 18, 2005           By: /s/ GEORGE HUKRIEDE
                                   ------------------------------
                                   George Hukriede
                                   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 3.2
 State of West Virginia
 
 Seal 1
 
 Certificate
 
 I, Joe Manchin III, Secretary of State of the State of West Virginia, hereby certify that
 
 PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 Control Number: 68621
 has filed its application for "Certificate of Limited Partnership" in my office according to the provisions of the West Virginia Code. I hereby declare the organization to be registered as a limited partnership from its effective date of July 28, 2004 until a certificate of cancellation has been filed with Secretary of State.
 
 Therefore, I hereby issue this
  
 CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 Seal 2
Given under my hand and the
Great Seal of the State of
West Virginia on this day of
July 28, 2004


/s/ Joe Manchin III
Secretary of State
I,
      John
      A. Wade, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aptimus, Inc.;





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;




4.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant **** and
      have:




(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
      registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      March 30, 2007




/s/
      John
      A. Wade


John
      A.
      Wade


Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








To the Board of Directors


National Health Partners, Inc.


Horsham, PA


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 of National Health Partners, Inc. and Subsidiaries, Registration Nos. 333-126315 and 333-171956, of our report dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of National Health Partners, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Health Partners, Inc. for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.








/s/ HJ & Associates, LLC





HJ & Associates, LLC


Salt Lake City, Utah


March 31, 2011
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2640 

To suspend temporarily the duty on potassium persulfate encapsulated in 

cellulose acetate butyrate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on potassium persulfate 

encapsulated in cellulose acetate butyrate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POTASSIUM PERSULFATE ENCAPSULATED IN 

4 CELLULOSE ACETATE BUTYRATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2640 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Potassium persulfate (CAS 

No. 7727–21–1) encapsulated 

in cellulose acetate butyrate 

(CAS No. 9004–36–8) (provided for in subheading 

3815.90.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
exv10w25



 





Exhibit 10.25



DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION


The compensation payable to all of the Company’s non-employee directors is as follows:




	 	•	 	An annual cash retainer of $5,000.00.
	 
	 	•	 	In addition, non-employee directors each receive $700.00 for each regular meeting of the
Board of Directors attended.






	 	•	 	In addition, members of the Audit Committee are paid $250.00 for each Audit Committee
meeting attended and the Audit Committee Chairman is paid an annual retainer of $4,000.00.




The compensation of executive officers is reviewed and adjusted on an annual basis as of the
individual’s anniversary date of hire, based upon the approval of the Executive Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors.


As of March 10, 2008, current annual salaries of each of the following executive officers is shown
below:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Salary
	Donita R. Koval
	 	$	321,360	 
	Daniel L. Warfel
	 	$	240,900	 
	David S. Runk
	 	$	174,552	 







34
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos.333-34510, 333-59316, 333-81172, 333-92276, 333-102907, 333-112380 and 333-116866) pertaining tothe 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the Amendedand Restated 2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan and the 2000 Employee Stock PurchasePlan of InterMune, Inc., (Form S-1 No. 333-45460) and (Form S-3 Nos. 333-75794, 333-115516 and333-139713) and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 10, 2008, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and schedule of InterMune, Inc., and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of InterMune, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPPalo Alto, California
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Ant onio, Texas

August 15, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00488

- CR

In re Gary L. Kennedy

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On August 2, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

determined that the mandamus petition is now moot. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date

.

It is so ORDERED on August 15, 2016

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15 day of August, 2016

.

_____________________________ Keith E. H ottle, Clerk

1 This proceeding ar ises out of Cause No. 2014CR7948 and 2015CR3877, styled State of Texas v. Gary L. Kennedy

, pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell presiding.
1

UNITED STATES BANKRUTPCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

In re:

Fred James Hessler CASE NO. 19-15157-SMG

Chapter 13

Debtor.

___________________________/

SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

STATE OF FLORIDA )

 ) ss:

COUNTY OF BROWARD )

Before me, the undersigned authority, duly authorized to take acknowledgments and 

administer oaths in the State and County aforesaid, personally appeared RACHAMIN COHEN, of 

Cohen Legal Services, P.A. who, after being duly sworn on oath, deposes and says:

1. That Affiant's law firm, Cohen Legal Services, P.A. (“CLS”) is Debtor’s, counsel 

in this action.

2. That Affiant has personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein or those facts as 

they appear in the business records of the law firm. Those records were made and kept in the 

ordinary course of business at the law firm. 

3. The law firm’s time records show that the following additional attorney time was 

spent defending Tri-County’s Motion for the Imposition of Sanctions:

Rachamin “Rocky” Cohen (Attorney): 2.9 hours @ $375.00 per hour =

Total: $1,087.50

True and correct copies of the law firm’s billing records for this matter are attached hereto and are 

incorporated herein by reference.

Case 19-15157-SMG Doc 157 Filed 04/29/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 19-15157-SMG Doc 157 Filed 04/29/20 Page 2 of 3
Activities Export 0

 AM

Date  Type Description Matter User Hours Rate

($/hr) Non-billable ($) Billable ($)

04/22/2020  Prepare for and attend hearing on

Motion.

00065-Hessler Rachamin

Cohen

0.20 375.00 - 75.00

04/22/2020  Review Tri-County's Reply to

Debtor's Response and draft

Notice of Late Filing.

00065-Hessler Rachamin

Cohen

0.30 375.00 - 112.50

04/21/2020  Draft, edit and file response to TriCounty's Rule 9011 Motion.

00065-Hessler Rachamin

Cohen

1.20 375.00 - 450.00

04/20/2020  Research case law on Rule 9011.!

Gulf Coast, 261 B.R. 707.

Davis v. Carl, 906 F.2d 533.

In re Mroz, 65 F.3d 1567.

In re Ballato, 183 B.R. 955.

In re Walker 532 F.3d 304.

00065-Hessler Rachamin

Cohen

0.90 375.00 - 337.50

03/30/2020  Review Motion for the Imposition of

Sanctions and case law cited in the

Motion.

00065-Hessler Rachamin

Cohen

0.30 375.00 - 112.50

.

-!

2.90h $0.00

0.0h

$1,087.50

Case 19-15157-SMG Doc 157 Filed 04/29/20 Page 3 of 3
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se e Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 9 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
PEGGY SANDOVAL, Petitioner - Appellant, vs. MUNICIPAL COURT, SAN JUAN COUNTY; TOM UDALL, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico, Respondents - Appellees. No. 97-2098 (D.C. No. CIV-96-948 LH/WWD)

(D.N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRORBY , EBEL , and KELLY , Circuit Judges. **
Petitioner-appellant Peggy Sandoval, appearing pro se, appeals from the denial of her habeas petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, an d dismissal of the action for lack of jurisdiction. The district court denied a certificate of appealability and it does not appear that Ms. Sandoval has applied for o ne in this court. See 28- 2 -

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Despite the invocation of var ious constitutional provisions and claims for general relief, the petition was pro perly construed as a collateral attack on the conviction. The district court adopt ed the magistrate judge’s conclusion that Ms. Sandoval could not satisfy the “in custody” requirement of habeas corpus based solely on a speeding convictionresulting in a $30.00 fine and a $17.00 assessment of court costs. See United States v. Watroba , 56 F.3d 28, 29 (6th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 269 (1995) (§ 2255); United States v. Segler , 37 F.3d 1131, 1137 (5th Cir. 1994) (same); Springv. Caldwell , 692 F.2d 994, 999 (5th Cir. 1982) (§ 2254). We agree. We construe Ms. Sandoval’s opening brief as an appl ication for a certificate of appealability, DENY it, and DISMISS the appeal.

Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3145 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3145

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxyfluorfen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Oxyfluorfen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OXYFLUORFEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2-Chloro-1-(3-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        ethoxy-4-                                                          31/2015.......
                        nitrophenoxy)4-
                        (trifluoromethyl)
                        benzene
                        (oxyfluorfen)
                        (CAS No. 42874-03-
                        3) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2918.99.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

t0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

146823

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146823

COA: 313699

Kent CC: 12

- 005622

- FC

NAVILLUS TRUDELL HEART, 12

- 005623

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal.