alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2005015DE.01003601.xml

| 19.1.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 15/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 15/36

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 795/2004 der Kommission vom 21. April 2004 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Betriebsprämienregelung gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1782/2003 des Rates mit gemeinsamen Regeln für Direktzahlungen im Rahmen der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik und mit bestimmten Stützungsregelungen für Inhaber landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 141 vom 30. April 2004
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 141 vom 30. April 2004

Auf Seite 8, Artikel 14 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b):

anstatt:

| „b) | bei Änderung des Rechtsstatus einer juristischen Person oder bei Umstellung des Rechtsstatus von einer natürlichen auf eine juristische Person gilt der Inhaber des ursprünglichen Betriebs in Bezug auf Betriebsführung, Gewinne und finanzielle Risiken als der Inhaber des neuen Betriebs.“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

bei Änderung des Rechtsstatus einer juristischen Person oder bei Umstellung des Rechtsstatus von einer natürlichen auf eine juristische Person gilt der Inhaber des ursprünglichen Betriebs in Bezug auf Betriebsführung, Gewinne und finanzielle Risiken als der Inhaber des neuen Betriebs.“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | bei Änderungen des Rechtsstatus einer juristischen Person oder von einer natürlichen Person zu einer juristischen Person oder umgekehrt, muss der Inhaber des neuen Betriebs diejenige Person sein, die die Kontrolle über den ursprünglichen Betrieb in Bezug auf Betriebsführung, Gewinne und finanzielle Risiken hatte.“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

bei Änderungen des Rechtsstatus einer juristischen Person oder von einer natürlichen Person zu einer juristischen Person oder umgekehrt, muss der Inhaber des neuen Betriebs diejenige Person sein, die die Kontrolle über den ursprünglichen Betrieb in Bezug auf Betriebsführung, Gewinne und finanzielle Risiken hatte.“

Auf Seite 12, Artikel 29, letzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Bei Faserflachs muss das Saatgut gemäß der Richtlinie 2002/57/EG des Rates (1) und insbesondere deren Artikel 12 zertifiziert sein.“

1

muss es heißen:

„Bei Faserhanf muss das Saatgut gemäß der Richtlinie 2002/57/EG des Rates (1) und insbesondere deren Artikel 12 zertifiziert sein.“

1

---
EXHIBIT 12

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (Dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                            2000          1999         1998         1997         1996
                                            ----          ----         ----         ----         ----
<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings:
     Pretax income                         $ 44,393     $ 45,130     $ 32,779     $ 33,697     $ 45,939
     Interest                                37,523       28,573       20,506       18,890       13,797
     Interest in Leases                       1,719        1,548        1,507        1,152          861

     Amortization of Cap Interest               293          242          190          123          107
                                           --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
                                           $ 83,928     $ 75,493     $ 54,982     $ 53,862     $ 60,704
                                           ========     ========     ========     ========     ========

Fixed charges:
     Interest                              $ 37,523     $ 28,573     $ 20,506     $ 18,890     $ 13,797
     Capitalized interest                     1,215        1,032        1,215          118          202
     Interest in leases                       1,719        1,548        1,507        1,152          861

     Amortization of Cap Interest               293          242          190          123          107
                                           --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
                                           $ 40,750     $ 31,395     $ 23,418     $ 20,283     $ 14,967
                                           ========     ========     ========     ========     ========


     Ratio:                                    2.1x         2.4x         2.3x         2.7x         4.1x

</TABLE>
exv10w5



 






Exhibit 10.5




Annual Compensation of Non-Employee Directors




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2008	 	2007	 	2006
	Name/Position	 	Retainer	 	Retainer	 	Retainer
	 
	Jacques Rebibo, Non-Executive Chairman
	 	$	48,000	 	 	$	48,000	 	 	$	43,050	 
	J. Randolph Babbitt, Non-Employee Director
	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	31,050	 
	Thomas M. Kody, Non-Employee Director
	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	31,050	 
	John W. Edgemond IV, Non-Employee Director
	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	31,050	 
	James L. Jadlos, Non-Employee Director
	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	36,000	 	 	$	31,050	 






The Non-Executive Chairman will be paid $1,000 of the 2008 retainer monthly, with the balance
being paid by quarterly installments in the month following the end of each fiscal quarter. The
other Non-Employee Directors will be paid the entire 2008 retainer in quarterly installments in the
month following the end of each fiscal quarter.
Exhibit
13.2



Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Title
18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Jane He, Chief Financial Officer of Linux Gold Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.
The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the year ended February 28, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Linux Gold Corp.

|                   |                        
|------------------ | -----------------------
|Date: July 5, 2012 | /s/
    Jane He        
|                   | Jane He,               
|                   | Chief Financial Officer



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by
Linux Gold Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3557 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of 

higher education that participate in programs under title IV of such 

Act from including predispute arbitration agreements in enrollment contracts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2012 

Mr. FRANKEN (for himself, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

BEGICH, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit 

institutions of higher education that participate in programs under title IV of such Act from including 

predispute arbitration agreements in enrollment contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arbitration Fairness 

5 for Students Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3557 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION 

2 AGREEMENTS. 

3 Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

4 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(30) The institution shall not include a 

7 predispute arbitration agreement in contracts with 

8 students for enrollment at the institution. In this 

9 paragraph, the term ‘predispute arbitration agree10 ment’ means any agreement to arbitrate a dispute 

11 that had not yet arisen at the time of the making 

12 of the agreement.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 331 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 331

 To ensure that military voters have the right to bring a civil action 
   under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act to 
                     safeguard their right to vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2011

  Mr. Barrasso (for himself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that military voters have the right to bring a civil action 
   under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act to 
                     safeguard their right to vote.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military and Overseas Voters' Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

    Section 105 of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1973ff-4) is amended by striking subsection (b) and 
inserting the following:
    ``(b) Private Right of Action.--A person who is aggrieved by a 
violation of this Act may bring a civil action in an appropriate 
district court for such declaratory or injunctive relief as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.
    ``(c) Attorney's Fees.--In a civil action under this section, the 
court may allow the prevailing party (other than the United States) 
reasonable attorney's fees, including litigation expenses, and costs.
    ``(d) Reports to Congress.--
            ``(1) Annual report.--Not later than December 31 of each 
        year, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress an annual 
        report on any civil action brought by the Attorney General 
        under subsection (a) during the preceding year or any civil 
        action brought by a private party under subsection (b) in which 
        the Attorney General intervened.
            ``(2) Report on enforcement.--Not later than July 1 of each 
        year in which a general election for Federal office is 
        scheduled, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a 
        report on the number of attorneys and other staff within the 
        Department of Justice assigned to enforce the Uniformed and 
        Overseas Citizen Absentee Voting Act, as well as the Attorney 
        General's plan to detect noncompliance by State and local 
        election officials with the requirements of the law.''.
                                 <all>
```
### March 5 , 2012

Mr. Cleveland Holladay

AIR-7 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

RE: Resolute Natural Resources Company’s McElmo Creek Gas Plant Air Modeling for 1-hour SO2, Located Near Aneth, UT - Modeling DVD

Dear Mr. Holladay:

On behalf of Resolute Natural Resource Company (RNRC), we are transmitting one (1) additional copy of the modeling DVD containing five years of meteor ological data, AERMOD input and output files and AERMAP input and output files. This modeling DVD is being sent to you at the request of Mr. Andrew Chew during our telephone c onversation of March 5, 2012.

Please contact me at (303) 790-1332, ext. 134 or by e-mail at thormel@mcvehil-monnett.com if you have any questions concerning this letter and/or attached DVD.

Sincerely,

Tom Hormel

Vice President

Enclosure (1)

Cc: Mr. Patrick Flynn, Resolute Natural Resources Company Mr. Andrew Chew, EPA Region IX
Robert WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2681

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
exhibittentwo.htm




Exhibit 10.2



























As of August 12, 2011







Nicholas D. Trbovich, Jr.


28 Tanglewood Drive, West


Orchard Park, NY 14127







Dear Mr. Nicholas D. Trbovich, Jr.:







You and Servotronics, Inc. (the “Company”) are parties to an Amended Employment Agreement, dated July 1, 2005 and ratified on June 30, 2006 pursuant to which you are employed by the Company.  This letter confirms such Amended Employment Agreement and subsequent ratification and subsequent Amendments dated August 4, 2006, July 6, 2007, July 9, 2008, December 31, 2008, July 2, 2009, and as of July 22, 2010 and any and all other relevant amendments (the “Amended Agreement”).







This letter will also confirm your agreement and that of the Company (pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors passed at a meeting held on August 12, 2011) to amend Paragraph 3 of the Amended Agreement to delete “$314,730.00” and insert in its place “$324,170.00” (effective May 1, 2011) subject to your acceptance which will be indicated by your signature below.







If the foregoing meets with your approval and you are willing to become bound hereby, will you please sign and return to the undersigned the enclosed copy of this letter.







Very truly yours,







SERVOTRONICS, INC.

















Bernadine E. Kucinski,


Assistant Corporate Secretary.













ACCEPTED AND AGREED


 




	 	 	 
	 /s/ Nicholas D. Trbovich, Jr.	 	 	 
	
Nicholas D. Trbovich, Jr.

	
 

	As of August 12, 2011	 
	 	 	Date
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report (the Report) of Saratoga Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  November 13, 2006

/s/ Thomas Cooke

Name: Thomas Cooke

Title:   Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
## NO. 12

- 10

- 00 228

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

' APPEAL FROM THE 4 02ND IN THE INTEREST OF M

. K

. , C

. K

. AND H

. K

. , ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF MINOR CHILDREN
' WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINIO N PER CURIAM Tracy Knight attempts to appeal from an order holding her in contempt and confining her for failing to pay court ordered child support. A contempt order is reviewable only by a petition for writ of habeas corpus (if the person in contempt is confined) or a petition for writ of mandamus (if no confinement is involved). Cadle Co. v. Lobingier , 50 S.W.3d 662, 671 (Tex. App.

– Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied) (citing In re Long , 984 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding)). We have no juris diction to review contempt orders by direct appeal. Tex. Animal Health Comm’n v. Nunley , 647 S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. 1983); Ex parte Cardwell , 416 S.W.2d 382, 384 (Tex. 1967) (orig. proceeding); Wagner v. Warnasch , 156 Tex. 334, 339, 295 S.W.2d 890, 893 (19 56). On July 22, 2010, this court notified Appellant that her notice of appeal does not show this court’s jurisdiction in that it does not refer to and is not accompanied by a final judgment or appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.1. Appellant was f urther informed that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information received in the appeal was amended on or before August 23, 2010 to show this court’s jurisdiction. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant responded by providing a file marked co py of the “OrderHolding Respondent in Contempt” and the “Commitment Order.” However, these orders

do not show the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. Opinion delivered August 4
, 2010

. Panel consiste d of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-39000, 333-88227) of Vixel Corporation of our
report dated January 31, 2002 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 31, 2002 relating to the financial
statement schedules, which also appears in this report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 28, 2002
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Lawrence Lichter, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.




Date:
      June 12, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Lawrence LichterName:
        Lawrence LichterTitle: Chief Financial
      Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49367-49368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19759]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8829]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Treasures From India: Jewels From the Al-Thani 
Collection''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Treasures from India: Jewels from the Al-
Thani Collection,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, 
from on or about October 28, 2014, until on or about January 25, 2015, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The

[[Page 49368]]

mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor 
(Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated; August 13, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-19759 Filed 8-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# L_2005168DE.01005002.xml

| 30.6.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 168/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 168/50

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 798/2004 des Rates vom 26. April 2004 zur Verlängerung der restriktiven Maßnahmen gegen Birma/Myanmar und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1081/2000

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 125 vom 28. April 2004
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 125 vom 28. April 2004

Seite 6, Artikel 6 Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„(3)   Die wissentliche und vorsätzliche Beteiligung an Aktivitäten, deren Ziel oder Folge unmittelbar oder mittelbar die Umgehung der in den Absätzen 1 und 2 genannten Maßnahmen ist, ist untersagt.“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   Die wissentliche und vorsätzliche Beteiligung an Aktivitäten, deren unmittelbar oder mittelbar die Umgehung der in den Absätzen 1 und 2 genannten Maßnahmen ist, ist untersagt.“

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Publications 
-  Reports 

#           Iowa magnetic and gravity maps and data: A web site for distribution of data      

      September 20, 2005    

Magnetic anomalies are due to variations in the Earth's magnetic field caused by the uneven distribution of magnetic minerals (primarily magnetite) in the rocks that make up the upper part of the Earth's crust. The features and patterns of the magnetic anomalies can be used to delineate details of subsurface geology, including the locations of buried faults and magnetite-bearing rocks and the depth to the base of sedimentary basins. This information is valuable for mineral exploration, geologic mapping, and environmental studies.

The Iowa magnetic map is constructed from grids that combine information collected in nine separate magnetic surveys conducted between 1953 and 1972. The data from these surveys are of varying quality. The design and specifications (terrain clearance, sampling rates, line spacing, and reduction procedures) varied from survey to survey depending on the purpose of the project and the technology of that time. Every attempt was made to acquire the data in digital form. All survey grids have been continued to 305 m (1,000 ft) above ground and merged together to form the State compilation.

## Citation Information

### Study Area

### Explore Search

                  - United States
                  - iowa

View All **
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

**I, Scott T. Macomber, certify that:**

 

1.             I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of NovaMed, Inc.; and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date:  April 22, 2011

 
| /s/   SCOTT T. MACOMBER   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Scott   T. Macomber       |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

----