Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Proposed Rules 19031 

11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

Distribution System, which describes 

the application procedure. 

The Proposal 

This action proposes to amend Title 

14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR), Part 71 by changing the airport 

name from Mansfield/Lahm Municipal 

Airport to Mansfield/Lahm Regional 

Airport; adding additional Class E 

airspace for SIAPs operations at 

Mansfield/Lahm Regional Airport, 

Mansfield, OH; and would update the 

geographic coordinates of Shelby 

Community Airport and Willard 

Airport. 

The area would be depicted on 

appropriate aeronautical charts. 

Class E airspace areas are published 

in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 

7400.9S, dated October 3, 2008, and 

effective October 31, 2008, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designation 

listed in this document would be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this rule, 

when promulgated, will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. The FAA’s authority to 

issue rules regarding aviation safety is 

found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. 

Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it would add 

additional controlled airspace at 

Mansfield/Lahm Regional Airport, 

Mansfield, OH. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; 

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING 

POINTS 

1. The authority citation for Part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated October 3, 2008, and effective 

October 31, 2008, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

AGL OH E5 Mansfield, OH [Amended] 

Mansfield, Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport, 

OH 

(Lat. 40°49′17′′ N., long. 82°31′00′′ W.) 

Galion, Galion Municipal Airport, OH 

(Lat. 40°45′12′′ N., long. 82°43′26′′ W.) 

Shelby, Shelby Community Airport, OH 

(Lat. 40°52′22′′ N., long. 82°41′51′′ W) 

Willard, Willard Airport, OH 

(Lat. 41°02′20′′ N., long. 82°43′28′′ W.) 

Mansfield VORTAC 

(Lat. 40°52′07′′ N., long. 82°35′28′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile 

radius of Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport 

and within a 6.3-mile radius of Galion 

Municipal Airport, and within a 6.3-mile 

radius of Shelby Community Airport, and 

within a 6.3-mile radius of Willard Airport, 

and within 4 miles each side of the 137° 

bearing from Mansfield Lahm Regional 

Airport extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 

11.1 miles southeast of the airport, and 

within 4 miles each side of the 317° bearing 

from Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport 

extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 10.7 

miles northwest of the airport, and within 6.1 

miles each side of the Mansfield VORTAC 

307° radial extending from the 6.9-mile 

radius to 13.3 miles northwest of the 

VORTAC, and within 4.4 miles each side of 

the Mansfield VORTAC 130° radial extending 

from the 6.9-mile radius to 13.8 miles 

southeast of the VORTAC. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on April 15, 

2009. 

Anthony D. Roetzel, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. E9–9522 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4901–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2008–1180] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; BWRC ‘300’ Enduro; Lake 

Moolvalya, Parker, AZ 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a 

safety zone, on the navigable waters of 

the Lake Moolvalya region on the lower 

Colorado River in support of the 

Bluewater Resort and Casino ‘300’ 

Enduro. This safety zone is necessary to 

provide for the safety of the 

participants, crew, spectators, 

participating vessels, and other vessels 

and users of the waterway. Persons and 

vessels are prohibited from entering 

into, transiting through, or anchoring 

within this safety zone unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port, or 

his designated representative. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must either be submitted to our Online 

docket via http://www.regulations.gov 

on or before May 27, 2009 or reach the 

Docket Management Facility by that 

date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by Coast Guard docket 

number USCG–2008–1180 using any 

one of the following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. To avoid duplication, 

please use only one of these methods. 

For instructions on submitting 

comments, see the ‘‘Public Participation 

and Request for Comments’’ portion of 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
19032 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call Petty Officer Shane Jackson, 

USCG, Waterways Management, U.S. 

Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619) 

278–2767. If you have questions on 

viewing or submitting material to the 

docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 

202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2008–1180), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online, or by fax, mail or hand 

delivery, but please use only one of 

these means. We recommend that you 

include your name and a mailing 

address, an e-mail address, or a phone 

number in the body of your document 

so that we can contact you if we have 

questions regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment Online, go 

to http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG– 

XXXX–XXXX’’ in the Docket ID box, 

press Enter, and then click on the 

balloon shape in the Actions column. If 

you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit them by 

mail and would like to know that they 

reached the Facility, please enclose a 

stamped, self-addressed postcard or 

envelope. We will consider all 

comments and material received during 

the comment period and may change 

the rule based on your comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert USCG– 

2008–1180 in the Docket ID box, press 

Enter, and then click on the item in the 

Docket ID column. You may also visit 

either the Docket Management Facility 

in Room W12–140 on the ground floor 

of the Department of Transportation 

West Building, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays; 

or the U.S. Coast Guard Sector San 

Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego, 

CA 92101 between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of all comments received into any 

of our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review the 

Department of Transportation’s Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008 issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one to the Docket Management 

Facility at the address under ADDRESSES

explaining why one would be 

beneficial. If we determine that one 

would aid this rulemaking, we will hold 

one at a time and place announced by 

a later notice in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

RPM Racing Enterprises is sponsoring 

the Bluewater Resort and Casino ‘300’ 

Enduro. The event is a closed boat 

endurance race consisting of 30 to 50 

powerboats ranging from 16 to 26 feet in 

length. The sponsor will provide four 

water rescue boats and eight patrol boats 

for this event. This safety zone is 

necessary to provide for the safety of the 

participants, crew, spectators, sponsor 

vessels, and other users of the 

waterway. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes a safety 

zone that would be enforced from 6 a.m. 

to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 to October 

25, 2009. The limits of the safety zone 

would be as follows: The Headgate Dam 

at 34°11.20 N., 114°13.74 W. following 

the river northeast to 34°11.76 N., 

114°13.50 W. 

This safety zone is necessary to 

provide for the safety of the crews, 

spectators, and participants of the event 

and to protect other vessels and users of 

the waterway. Persons and vessels will 

be prohibited from entering into, 

transiting through, or anchoring within 

this safety zone unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port, or his designated 

representative. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, 

Regulatory Planning and Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office 

of Management and Budget has not 

reviewed it under that Order. 

We expect the economic impact of 

this proposed rule to be so minimal that 

a full Regulatory Evaluation is 

unnecessary. This determination is 

based on the size and location of the 

safety zone. Commercial vessels will not 

be hindered by the safety zone. 

Recreational vessels will not be allowed 

to transit through the designated safety 

zone during the specified times. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

This proposed rule would affect the 

following entities, some of which might 

be small entities: The owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor in the Lake Moolvalya region 

on the lower Colorado River from 6 a.m. 

to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 to October 

25, 2009. 

This safety zone would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the following reasons. This rule would 

be in effect for twelve hours for a period 

of 3 days. Although the safety zone 

would apply to the entire width of the 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Proposed Rules 19033 

river, traffic would be allowed to pass 

through the zone with the permission of 

the Coast Guard patrol commander. 

Before the effective period, we will 

publish a local notice to mariners (LNM) 

and will issue broadcast notice to 

mariners (BNM) alerts via marine 

channel 16 VFH before the safety zone 

is enforced. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Petty Officer 

Kristen Beer, USCG, Waterways 

Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector 

San Diego at (619) 278–7233. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this rule or any policy or action of the 

Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for 

Federalism under Executive Order 

13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial 

direct effect on State or local 

governments and would either preempt 

State law or impose a substantial direct 

cost of compliance on them. We have 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and have determined that it does 

not have implications for Federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule would not 

result in such an expenditure, we do 

discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not effect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 0023.1 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ 

supporting this preliminary 

determination is available in the docket 

where indicated under ADDRESSES. This 

proposed rule involves regulations that 

establish a temporary safety zone to 

provide for the safety of personnel 

during the BWRC ‘300’ Enduro. We seek 

any comments or information that may 

lead to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 122, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add temporary safety zone 

§ 165.T11–145 to read as follows: 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
19034 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

§ 165.T11–145 Safety zone; BWRC ‘300’ 

Enduro; Lake Moolvalya, Parker, AZ. 

(a) Location. The limits of the 

proposed safety zone are as follows: the 

Headgate Dam at 34°11.20 N., 114°13.74 

W. following the river northeast to 

34°11.76 N., 114°13.50 W. 

(b) Enforcement Period. This section 

will be enforced from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. 

on October 23, 2009 through October 25, 

2009. If the event concludes prior to the 

scheduled termination time, the Captain 

of the Port will cease enforcement of 

this safety zone and will announce that 

fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

(c) Definitions. The following 

definition applies to this section: 

designated representative means any 

commissioned, warrant, and petty 

officers of the Coast Guard on board 

Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, 

and local, State, and Federal law 

enforcement vessels who have been 

authorized to act on the behalf of the 

Captain of the Port. 

(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit 

through or anchoring within this safety 

zone is prohibited unless authorized by 

the Captain of the Port of San Diego or 

his designated on-scene representative. 

(2) Mariners requesting permission to 

transit through the safety zone may 

request authorization to do so from the 

Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The 

PATCOM may be contacted on VHF–FM 

Channel 16. 

(3) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the 

designated representative. 

(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast 

Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, 

flashing light, or other means, the 

operator of a vessel shall proceed as 

directed. 

(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted 

by other Federal, State, or local 

agencies. 

Dated: February 13, 2009. 

T.H. Farris, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Diego. 

[FR Doc. E9–9575 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2009–0120] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Coronado Fourth of July 

Fireworks; San Diego Bay, San Diego, 

CA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes 

establishing a temporary safety zone on 

the navigable waters of the San Diego 

Bay in support of the Coronado Fourth 

of July Fireworks. This temporary safety 

zone is necessary to provide for the 

safety of crew, spectators, and other 

users and vessels of the waterway. 

Persons and vessels are prohibited from 

entering into, transiting through, or 

anchoring within this temporary safety 

zone unless authorized by the Captain 

of the Port or his designated 

representative. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before May 27, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2009–0120 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these methods. See the ‘‘Public 

Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer, 

USCG, Waterways Management, U.S. 

Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619) 

278–7262. If you have questions on 

viewing or submitting material to the 

docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 

202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2009–0120), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand delivery or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG– 

2009–0120’’ in the Docket ID box, press 

Enter, and then click on the balloon 

shape in the Actions column. If you 

submit your comments by mail or hand 

delivery, submit them in an unbound 

format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, 

suitable for copying and electronic 

filing. If you submit them by mail and 

would like to know that they reached 

the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 

self-addressed postcard or envelope. We 

will consider all comments and material 

received during the comment period 

and may change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert USCG– 

2009–0120 in the Docket ID box, press 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS