### 31682 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 29, 2012 / Notices

Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–12927 Filed 5–25–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION** 

**[File No. 500–1]**

**In the Matter of Quintek Technologies, Inc., The Saint James Co., Urigen**  **Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Valor Energy Corp., Wherify Wireless, Inc., and**  **WinWin Gaming, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading** 

May 24, 2012.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Quintek Technologies, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2007.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of The Saint James Co. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2009.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Urigen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended March 31, 2010.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Valor Energy Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended February 28, 2009.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Wherify Wireless, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 2008.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of WinWin Gaming, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 2006.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 24, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 7, 2012.

By the Commission. Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–13015 Filed 5–24–12; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION** 

**[File No. 500–1]**

**In the Matter of Indocan Resources, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading** 

May 24, 2012.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Indocan Resources, Inc. (‘‘IDCN’’) because of questions concerning the adequacy of publicly available information about the
company.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed
company.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, on May 24, 2012 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on June 7, 2012.

By the Commission. Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–13012 Filed 5–24–12; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice 7897]**

**Renewal of Cultural Property Advisory Committee Charter** 

**SUMMARY :**  The Charter of the Department of State’s Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC) has been renewed for an additional two years.

The Charter of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee is being renewed for a two-year period. The Committee was established by the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act of 1983, 19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. It reviews requests from other countries seeking U.S. import restrictions on archaeological or ethnological material the pillage of which places a country’s cultural heritage in jeopardy. The Committee makes findings and recommendations to the President’s designee who, on behalf of the President, determines whether to impose the import restrictions. The membership of the Committee consists of private sector experts in archaeology, anthropology, or ethnology; experts in the international sale of cultural property; and representatives of museums and of the general public.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Cultural Heritage Center, U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20522. Telephone: (202) 632–6301; Fax: (202)
632–6300.

Dated: April 27, 2012. Maria P. Kouroupas, Executive Director, Cultural Property Advisory, Committee Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012–12937 Filed 5–25–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–11–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice 7896]**

**U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private International**  **Law (ACPIL)—Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Study Group** 

The Office of Private International Law, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State hereby gives notice that the ACPIL Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Study Group will hold a public meeting on Friday June 15, 2012, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The public meeting will take place at the State Department Harry S Truman Building. The ACPIL ODR Study Group will meet to discuss the recent session of the UNCITRAL ODR Working Group, held May 21 through May 25, 2012, and will specifically address security issues relating to use of the ODR rules, including measures to address the risk of fraud involving consumers who participate.

The UNCITRAL ODR Working Group is charged with the development of legal instruments for resolving both business to business and business to consumer cross-border electronic commerce disputes. The Working Group is in the process of developing generic ODRprocedural rules for resolution of crossborder electronic commerce disputes, along with separate instruments that may take the form of annexes on guidelines and minimum requirements for online dispute resolution providers and arbitrators, substantive legal principles for resolving disputes, and a