alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

www.flsb.uscourts.gov

In re:

VERNELL ROBINSON

Debtor.

___________________________________/

Case No. 19-18883-BKC-RAM

Chapter 7

ORDER SUSTAINING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTOR’S CLAIMED 

EXEMPTIONS, GRANTING TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEBTOR TO TURN

OVER CONTROL OF PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM, AND 

DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO DO LEGAL RESEARCH

THIS CAUSE came on before the Court on April 2, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. upon the 

Trustee’s Objection To Debtor’s Claimed Exemptions and Motion to Compel Debtor to Turn 

Over Control of Personal Injury Claim and Compel Debtor’s Personal Injury Counsel to Provide 

Requested Documentation [ECF No. 37] (the “Objection”) and the Debtor’s Motion to Extend 

Time to Do Legal Research [ECF No. 46] (the “Motion”), and the Court, having reviewed the 

Objection, the Motion, and the file, having heard the arguments of counsel for the Trustee and 

Debtor, being otherwise duly advised in the matter, and for the reasons stated on the record,

Robert A. Mark, Judge

United States Bankruptcy Court

_____________________________________________________________________________

ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 6, 2020.

Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 57 Filed 04/07/20 Page 1 of 3
ORDERS as follows:

1. Trustee’s Objection to Debtor’s Claimed Exemptions is SUSTAINED, with leave 

for the Debtor to amend her schedules to claim exemptions pursuant to applicable Florida 

Statutes.

2. Trustee’s Motion to Compel Debtor to Turnover Control of Personal Injury Claim

is GRANTED.

3. The interest of Vernell Robinson (the “Debtor”) in her pending pre-petition

personal injury claim (the “Personal Injury Claim”) is property of the bankruptcy estate, pursuant 

to 11 U.S.C. § 541.

4. Accordingly, Barry E. Mukamal, in his capacity as Chapter 7 trustee for the 

bankruptcy estate of Vernell Robinson (the “Trustee”), has the sole and exclusive right to 

prosecute and/or settle the Personal Injury Claim.

5. The Debtor does not have the right to prosecute and/or settle the Personal Injury 

Claim.

6. The Debtor must immediately cease all efforts to administer the Personal Injury 

Claim for her own benefit, and the Debtor must immediately cease her continued prosecution of 

the Personal Injury Action.

7. The Debtor shall immediately and completely turn over control of the Personal 

Injury Claim to the Trustee.

8. The Debtor shall cooperate fully with the Trustee’s prosecution of the Personal 

Injury Claim.

9. Debtor’s Motion to Extend Time to Do Legal Research is DENIED.

10. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Order.

###

Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 57 Filed 04/07/20 Page 2 of 3
Submitted by:

Christian Somodevilla, Esq.

LSAS Attorneys

2 S Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2300

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 894-6163

Facsimile: (305) 503-9447

cs@lsaslaw.com

Copies to:

Christian Somodevilla, Esq.

Attorney Somodevilla is directed to serve copies of this order on all interested parties and to file 

a certificate of service

Case 19-18883-RAM Doc 57 Filed 04/07/20 Page 3 of 3
# EUR-Lex - 32004F0106(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004F0106(01)

**Council Act of 27 November 2003 drawing up, on the basis of Article 43(1) of the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention), a Protocol amending that Convention - Declaration **

*
Official Journal 002 , 06/01/2004 P. 0001 - 0002 *

Council Act

of 27 November 2003

drawing up, on the basis of Article 43(1) of the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention), a Protocol amending that Convention

(2004/C 2/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office (EuropolConvention)(1), and in particular Article 43(1) thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Denmark(2),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(3),

Having regard to the opinion of the Management Board of Europol(4),

Whereas:

(1) Pursuant to Article 30(2) of the Treaty on European Union, within a period of five years after the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam on 1 May 1999, the Council is to promote cooperation in a number of different areas, inter alia, through Europol.

(2) The Tampere European Council in October 1999 stated that Europol has a key role with respect to cooperation between Member States' authorities in the field of cross-border crime investigation in supporting Union-wide crime prevention, analyses and investigation. The European Council called on the Council to provide Europol with the necessary support,

HAS DECIDED to draw up the attached Protocol amending the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention), signed today by the representatives of the governments of the Member States, and

RECOMMENDS

that Member States adopt this Protocol in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Brussels, 27 November 2003.

For the Council

The President

R. Castelli

(1) OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 2.

(2) OJ C 172, 18.7.2002, p. 15.

(3) Opinion delivered on 9 April 2003 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(4) Opinion delivered on 31 October 2002; additional opinion delivered on 24 June 2003.

Declaration by the Council

The Council agrees that the instruction of Europol to deal with "fraud" as one of the forms of crime referred to in the Annex to the Europol Convention confers, as far as tax fraud and customs fraud is concerned, competences to Europol only in the field of improvement of the effectiveness and cooperation of the competent authorities of the Member States responsible for the functioning of the criminal law enforcement system and not their authorities responsible for ensuring the levying of taxes and customs duties.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         208,128
<SECURITIES>                                 3,852,608
<RECEIVABLES>                                  796,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,529,069
<PP&E>                                       4,223,999
<DEPRECIATION>                               (469,420)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,459,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,710,179
<BONDS>                                      2,300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,391
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,442,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,459,962
<SALES>                                         72,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,429
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,568,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,062,681)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (433,668)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (433,688)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Unitil Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned Robert G. Schoenberger,
Chief Executive Officer and President, Mark H. Collin, Chief Financial Officer and Laurence M. Brock, Chief Accounting Officer, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           |  |                                       |  |                 
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Signature                  |  | Capacity                              |  | Date            
|/s/ Robert G. Schoenberger |  |                                       |  |                 
|Robert G. Schoenberger     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President |  | October 23, 2009
|                           |  |                                      
|/s/ Mark H. Collin         |  |                                       |  |                 
|Mark H. Collin             |  | Chief Financial Officer               |  | October 23, 2009
|                           |  |                                      
|/s/ Laurence M. Brock      |  |                                       |  |                 
|Laurence M. Brock          |  | Chief Accounting Officer              |  | October 23, 2009
# EUR-Lex - 32004R0109 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004R0109

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/2004 of 22 January 2004 fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 19th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 **

*
Official Journal L 016 , 23/01/2004 P. 0034 - 0034 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/2004

of 22 January 2004

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 19th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector(1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2196/2003(2), and in particular Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 of 18 July 2003 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar(3), for the 2003/2004 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

(2) Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

(3) Following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the 19th partial invitation to tender, the provisions set out in Article 1 should be adopted.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 19th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 the maximum amount of the export refund to certain third countries is fixed at 53,024 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 January 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2004.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 328, 17.12.2003, p. 17.

(3) OJ L 181, 19.7.2003, p. 7.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 8, 2021

No. 04-20-00471-CV

Kevin MILLER as agent for Miller & Bicklein,

Appellant

v.

Kim TINDALL & Associates, LLC,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-01799

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On September 2, 2021, appellant moved for rehearing of this court’s August 18, 2021 

decision. Having fully considered appellant’s motion for rehearing, we DENY the motion for 

rehearing.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
  Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Monique van Oord, Chief Financial Officer of Linux Gold Corp.,
  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Linux Gold Corp. for the
  year ended February 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
  78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  Linux Gold Corp.

Richmond, BC Canada

|                | by: /s/
      Monique van Oord
|--------------- | ------------------------------
|August 11, 2006 |                               
|                | Monique van Oord              
|                | Chief Financial Officer       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Linux Gold Corp. and will be retained by Linux Gold
  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1225

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM269AD

A300-57-0249, R02 --- 6/18/10

A300-57-0249, R01 --- 12/19/07

A300-57-0249 --- 5/22/07

A300-57-6106, R02 --- 6/18/10

A300-57-6106, R01 --- 1/28/08

A300-57-6106 --- 5/22/07

A310-57-2090, R02 --- 6/18/10

A310-57-2090, R01 --- 12/19/07

A310-57-2090 --- 5/22/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11106

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

STEVIE ELBERT JONES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-237-1

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stevie Elbert Jones was convicted of one charge of bank robbery and 

sentenced to serve 151 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised 

release. Now, he argues that the district court erred in determining that his 

Texas robbery convictions are crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1, 

4B1.2.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 25, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11106 Document: 00514930082 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2019
No. 18-11106

2

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance. Jones correctly concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United 

States v. Santiesteban-Hernandez, 469 F.3d 376, 380-81 (5th Cir. 2006), 

abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 547-

63 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc). Because he raises the issue only to preserve it for 

further review, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., 

Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the 

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the 

Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-11106 Document: 00514930082 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2019
EXHIBIT
      23




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No.’s
      333-136894, 333-136893, 333-136891, 333-114513, 333-88798 and 333-64056) on
      Form
      S-8 of iSECUREtrac Corp. of our report dated March 18, 2008, relating to our
      audit of the consolidated financial statements which is incorporated in this
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, of iSECUREtrac Corp. for the year ended December
      31, 2007.








/s/
      McGladrey & Pullen LLP


Kansas
      City, Missouri


March
      18,
      2008
INRE: 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 19-19740-BKC-LMI 

PROCEEDING UNDERCHAPTER 13 

LUIS ALBERTO ORDONEZ 

DEBTOR I ------------

TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING 

COMES NOW Nancy K. Neidich, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee, and files her Motion to Dismiss 

pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 1307(c) for the reasons set forth below: 

1. Material change prejudicial to creditors in payment terms resulting from unscheduled, unlisted, or 

improperly listed tax or other claims. 

2. The Trustee faxed to the counsel of record a letter requesting the issue be addressed. See attached 

letter with fax confirmation. 

WHEREFORE, the Trustee requests the case be dismissed for failure to address the issue stated therein. 

I CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Trustee's Motion to Dismiss and Notice of 

Hearing was mailed to those parties listed below on t).f (TtMBeL 1, ta'Z--6 

jZ( Jose Ignacio Miceli, Esq. 

FLORIDA BAR NO: 0077539 

Case 19-19740-LMI Doc 68 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 3
NOTICE OF HEARING AND TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS 

CASE NO.: 19-19740-BKC-LMI 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

COPIES FURNISHED TO: 

NANCY K. NEIDICH 

STANDING CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 

P.O. BOX 279806 

MIRAMAR, FL 33027-9806 

By Mail: 

DEBTOR 

LUIS ALBERTO ORDONEZ 

1855 N. 60 STREET, #205 

HIALEAH, FL 33012 

Via Electronic Service: 

ATTORNEY FOR DEBTOR 

RICHARD ADAMS,ESQ. 

ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, PA 

6500 COWPEN ROAD 

SUITE 101 

MIAMI LAKES, FL 33014 

Case 19-19740-LMI Doc 68 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 3
02/11/2020 TUE 14:20 FAX 9544434452 CH13MIAMI FAX 

********************* 

**' FAX TX RF.PORT *·H· 

********************* 

TRANSMISSION OK 

JOB NO. 

DESTINATION ADDRESS 

SUBADDRESS 

DESTINATION ID 

ST. TIME 

TX/RX TIME 

PGS. 

RESULT 

OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 ST ANDING TRUSTEE 

Southern District of Flo1ida 

3714 

3058243868 

02/11 14:19 

00' 42 

1 

OK 

---------------------·-----

02/11/2020 

To: RICHARD ADAl\iIS,ESQ 

Re: Luis Albe1to Ordonez 

Dear RICHARD ADAMS,ESQ 

Case: 19-19740-LMI 

NANCY K. NEIDICH, TRUSTEE 

P.O. Box 279806 

Miramar, Florida 33027 

(954) 443-4402 

Facsimile: (954) 443-4452 

The Trustee has recommended confirmation of a Plan in the above-referenced case based upon your assurance 

that the creditor had agreed to the Debtor's treatment of its collateral. 

Creditor: 

Plan fails to provide for 100% of allowed unsecured claims 

The Debtor is directed to either file a Motion to Ivlodi±~i the Confirmed Plan to include the amount listed in the 

Proof of Claim, or an Objection to the Proof of Claim within twenty (20) days of this letter or the Tl-us tee may 

file a Motion to Dismiss this case with prejudice for six (6) months. 

Very tiuly yours, 

Claims Administrator 

OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 STANDING TRUSTEE 

141001 

Case 19-19740-LMI Doc 68 Filed 09/03/20 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF KNOLOGY, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: August 15, 2005
# L_2017144DE.01003701.xml

| 7.6.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 144/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 144/37

---

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2004/558/EG der Kommission vom 15. Juli 2004 zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 64/432/EWG des Rates hinsichtlich ergänzender Garantien im innergemeinschaftlichen Handel mit Rindern in Bezug auf die infektiöse bovine Rhinotracheitis und der Genehmigung der von einigen Mitgliedstaaten vorgelegten Tilgungsprogramme

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 249 vom 23. Juli 2004
  )

Seite 21, Artikel 1:

Anstatt:

„Die von den Mitgliedstaaten vorgelegten und in der ersten Spalte der Tabelle in Anhang I aufgeführten Programme zur Bekämpfung und Tilgung von Infektionen mit dem bovinen Herpesvirus Typ 1, nachstehend ‚infektiöse bovine Rhinotracheitis‘ oder ‚IBR‘ genannt, in den in der zweiten Spalte aufgeführten Regionen dieser Mitgliedstaaten werden genehmigt.“

muss es heißen:

„Die von den in der ersten Spalte der Tabelle in Anhang I aufgeführten Mitgliedstaaten vorgelegten Programme zur Bekämpfung und Tilgung von Infektionen mit dem bovinen Herpesvirus Typ 1 (BHV1), nachstehend ‚infektiöse bovine Rhinotracheitis‘ oder ‚IBR‘ genannt, in den in der zweiten Spalte aufgeführten Regionen dieser Mitgliedstaaten werden genehmigt.“

---