# L_2004244EN.01005101.xml

| 16.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/51

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 13 July 2004

amending Decision 2003/828/EC as regards movements of animals vaccinated against bluetongue from protection zones

(notified under document number C(2004) 1925)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/550/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000 laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue (1), and in particular Article 9(1)(c) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2003/828/EC of 25 November 2003 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue (2) was adopted in the light of the bluetongue situation prevailing in the affected regions of the Community. That Decision demarcates protection and surveillance zones (the restricted zones) corresponding to specific epidemiological situations and lays down the conditions for providing exemptions from the exit ban laid down in Directive 2000/75/EC (the exit ban) on movements of animals in and from those zones. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2003/828/EC of 25 November 2003 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue (2) was adopted in the light of the bluetongue situation prevailing in the affected regions of the Community. That Decision demarcates protection and surveillance zones (the restricted zones) corresponding to specific epidemiological situations and lays down the conditions for providing exemptions from the exit ban laid down in Directive 2000/75/EC (the exit ban) on movements of animals in and from those zones.

| (2) | A Symposium on bluetongue was organised by the Office International des Epizooties (OIE, World Organisation for Animal Health) from 26 to 29 October 2003. One of the conclusions of that Symposium was that animals may move from an infected zone to a bluetongue-free zone without posing a risk of virus spread if they have been vaccinated at least one month prior to the date of movement, provided that the vaccine used covers all serotypes present in the area of origin. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A Symposium on bluetongue was organised by the Office International des Epizooties (OIE, World Organisation for Animal Health) from 26 to 29 October 2003. One of the conclusions of that Symposium was that animals may move from an infected zone to a bluetongue-free zone without posing a risk of virus spread if they have been vaccinated at least one month prior to the date of movement, provided that the vaccine used covers all serotypes present in the area of origin.

| (3) | Taking into account that conclusion, the conditions for movements of vaccinated animals laid down in Decision 2003/828/EC were amended, on the basis of the situation prevailing during the last quarter of 2003, by Decision 2004/34/EC in order to allow such movements without requiring the cessation of the virus circulation in the area of origin or of the vector activity in the area of destination. Nevertheless, as a precaution, Decision 2003/828/EC, as amended by Decision 2004/34/EC, provided that possibility only for domestic movements from areas where the vaccination had been completed according to the programme adopted by the competent authority of the Member State concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Taking into account that conclusion, the conditions for movements of vaccinated animals laid down in Decision 2003/828/EC were amended, on the basis of the situation prevailing during the last quarter of 2003, by Decision 2004/34/EC in order to allow such movements without requiring the cessation of the virus circulation in the area of origin or of the vector activity in the area of destination. Nevertheless, as a precaution, Decision 2003/828/EC, as amended by Decision 2004/34/EC, provided that possibility only for domestic movements from areas where the vaccination had been completed according to the programme adopted by the competent authority of the Member State concerned.

| (4) | After the third vaccination campaign which was conducted during winter 2003 to 2004 and the general reduction of the virus circulation in all the restricted zones concerned, it is now possible to consider general conditions for national movements of vaccinated animals from any restricted zones without taking into consideration the residual virus circulation in the area of origin. Nevertheless, as a precaution, animals should come from herds vaccinated according to the programme adopted by the competent authority of the Member State concerned and the vector surveillance programme in an epidemiologically relevant area of destination should have proved no adult Culicoïdes imicola activity. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

After the third vaccination campaign which was conducted during winter 2003 to 2004 and the general reduction of the virus circulation in all the restricted zones concerned, it is now possible to consider general conditions for national movements of vaccinated animals from any restricted zones without taking into consideration the residual virus circulation in the area of origin. Nevertheless, as a precaution, animals should come from herds vaccinated according to the programme adopted by the competent authority of the Member State concerned and the vector surveillance programme in an epidemiologically relevant area of destination should have proved no adult Culicoïdes imicola activity.

| (5) | Article 3(1) of Decision 2003/828/EC provides for exemptions from the exit ban for domestic movements of animals, their sperm, ova and embryos and applies to certain restricted zones in France and Italy. It is appropriate to correct a clerical error concerning the omission of Spain from Article 3(1) of that Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Article 3(1) of Decision 2003/828/EC provides for exemptions from the exit ban for domestic movements of animals, their sperm, ova and embryos and applies to certain restricted zones in France and Italy. It is appropriate to correct a clerical error concerning the omission of Spain from Article 3(1) of that Decision.

| (6) | Decision 2003/828/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Decision 2003/828/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (7) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2003/828/EC is amended as follows:

| 1. | in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:

  ‘1.   Domestic dispatches of animals, their sperm, ova and embryos, from a restricted zone set out in Annex I shall be exempted from the exit ban provided that the animals, their sperm, ova and embryos comply with the conditions set out in Annex II or, in the case of Spain, France and Italy, that they comply with paragraph 2 or in the case of Greece that they comply with paragraph 3.


  2.   In Spain, France and Italy, domestic dispatches as provided for in paragraph 1 shall be exempted from the exit ban by the competent authority if:






  (a) | the animals originate from a herd vaccinated according to the programme adopted by the competent authority; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

in Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:

‘1.   Domestic dispatches of animals, their sperm, ova and embryos, from a restricted zone set out in Annex I shall be exempted from the exit ban provided that the animals, their sperm, ova and embryos comply with the conditions set out in Annex II or, in the case of Spain, France and Italy, that they comply with paragraph 2 or in the case of Greece that they comply with paragraph 3.

2.   In Spain, France and Italy, domestic dispatches as provided for in paragraph 1 shall be exempted from the exit ban by the competent authority if:

(a)

the animals originate from a herd vaccinated according to the programme adopted by the competent authority;

| (b) | the animals have been vaccinated more than 30 days and less than one year before the date of dispatch against the serotype(s) present or possibly present in an epidemiologically relevant area of origin; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the animals have been vaccinated more than 30 days and less than one year before the date of dispatch against the serotype(s) present or possibly present in an epidemiologically relevant area of origin;

| (c) | the vector surveillance programme in an epidemiologically relevant area of destination has proved no adult Culicoïdes imicola activity.’; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the vector surveillance programme in an epidemiologically relevant area of destination has proved no adult Culicoïdes imicola activity.’;

| 2. | Annex I is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annex I is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 5 August 2004.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2004.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 74.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 311, 27.11.2003, p. 41. Decision as amended by Decision 2004/34/EC (OJ L 7, 13.1.2004, p. 47).

2

---

ANNEX

‘ANNEX I

(Restricted zones: geographic areas where protection and surveillance zones shall be established by the Member States)

Zone A (serotypes 2 and 9 and, to a lesser extent, 4 and 16)

Italy

| Abruzzo | : | Chieti, all Municipalities belonging to the Local Health Unit of Avezzano-Sulmona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Basilicata | : | Matera, and Potenza |
| Calabria | : | Catanzaro, Cosenza, Crotone, Reggio Calabria, Vibo Valentia |
| Campania | : | Caserta, Benevento, Avellino, Napoli, Salerno |
| Lazio | : | Frosinone, Latina |
| Molise | : | Isernia, Campobasso |
| Puglia | : | Foggia, Bari, Lecce, Taranto, Brindisi |
| Sicilia | : | Agrigento, Catania, Caltanissetta, Enna, Messina, Palermo, Ragusa, Siracusa and Trapani |

Abruzzo

:

Chieti, all Municipalities belonging to the Local Health Unit of Avezzano-Sulmona

Basilicata

:

Matera, and Potenza

Calabria

:

Catanzaro, Cosenza, Crotone, Reggio Calabria, Vibo Valentia

Campania

:

Caserta, Benevento, Avellino, Napoli, Salerno

Lazio

:

Frosinone, Latina

Molise

:

Isernia, Campobasso

Puglia

:

Foggia, Bari, Lecce, Taranto, Brindisi

Sicilia

:

Agrigento, Catania, Caltanissetta, Enna, Messina, Palermo, Ragusa, Siracusa and Trapani

Malta (*1)

Zone B (serotype 2)

Italy

| Abruzzo | : | L’Aquila with the exception of all Municipalities belonging to the Local Health Unit of Avezzano-Sulmona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lazio | : | Viterbo, Roma, Rieti |
| Marche | : | Ascoli Piceno, Macerata |
| Toscana | : | Massa Carrara, Pisa, Grosseto, Livorno |
| Umbria | : | Terni and Perugia |

Abruzzo

:

L’Aquila with the exception of all Municipalities belonging to the Local Health Unit of Avezzano-Sulmona

Lazio

:

Viterbo, Roma, Rieti

Marche

:

Ascoli Piceno, Macerata

Toscana

:

Massa Carrara, Pisa, Grosseto, Livorno

Umbria

:

Terni and Perugia

Zone C (serotypes 2 and 4 and, to a lesser extent, 16)

Spain

Islas Baleares

France

Corse du sud, Haute-Corse

Italy

| Sardinia | : | Cagliari, Nuoro, Sassari, Oristano |
| --- | --- | --- |

Sardinia

:

Cagliari, Nuoro, Sassari, Oristano

Zone D

Greece

The entire Greek territory with the exception of prefectorates listed in Zone E

Zone E

Greece

Dodekanisi, Samos, Chios and Lesvos prefectorates

Cyprus (*1)

---

(*1)  Transitional animal health status for Cyprus and Malta, pending the analysis of epidemiological data; status to be reviewed at the latest by 1 May 2007.

*1

---