alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2004272EN.01001201.xml

| 20.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 272/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 272/12

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 7 July 2004

on the authorisation of the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce according to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 866/2004

(notified under document number C(2004) 2583)

(Only the Greek text is authentic)

(2004/604/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 866/2004 (1), and in particular Article 4(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | According to Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 866/2004, goods arriving from the areas not under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus in the areas under such control shall be accompanied by a document issued by the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce, duly authorised by the Commission in agreement with the Government of the Republic of Cyprus. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

According to Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 866/2004, goods arriving from the areas not under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus in the areas under such control shall be accompanied by a document issued by the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce, duly authorised by the Commission in agreement with the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.

| (2) | It is therefore necessary to duly authorise the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce for that purpose. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is therefore necessary to duly authorise the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce for that purpose.

| (3) | The Government of the Republic of Cyprus gave its agreement to this authorisation, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Government of the Republic of Cyprus gave its agreement to this authorisation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce is authorised to issue accompanying documents as provided for in Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 866/2004.

A specimen of the accompanying document is given in Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1480/2004 (2).

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Cyprus.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2004.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 128; corrigendum in OJ L 206, 9.6.2004, p. 51.

1

(2)  See page 3 of this Official Journal.

2

---
# U nit ed Sta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

Nos. 06-1626, 07-1258

BRAND ON S. BL AI R et al.,

Pla int if fs , A pp e lla nts ,

v

.
CI TY OF WORC ESTER et al.,

De fe nd a nts , A pp e lle e s.

ER RA TA SHEET

Th e op ini on

of thi s Co ur t is su e d o n A pr il 8 , 2 00 8, is a me nd e d a s f

oll ow s:

On the c ov e r s he e t, r e pla c e " An dr e w J. Ca mba c c ini " wi th " An dr e w J. G a mba c c ini "
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50369 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ANGEL PATILLO-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-606-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Angel Patillo-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
MEMORANDUM

Date: February 15, 2012

Subject: Stakeholder call about MOVES Transition for Regional Conformity Analyses 

From: Meg Patulski, State Measures and Transportation Planning Center, OTAQ

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0393

On March 17, 2011, a conference call was held to discuss stakeholder concerns regarding 

the transition to using MOVES for regional conformity analyses. EPA’s Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality (Lee Cook, Rudy Kapichak, Meg Patulski, and Astrid Larsen) 

hosted the call with Robert Yuhnke, an attorney and liaison for several environmental 

stakeholders. EPA expressed its intentions to proceed with a rulemaking to extend the 

MOVES2010 regional conformity analysis grace period because several state and local 

transportation and air quality agencies had requested additional transition time for using MOVES 

for regional conformity analyses. State and local agencies were concerned about the significant 

software, operational and technical differences between MOVES and the previous emissions 

model, MOBILE. Mr. Yuhnke expressed concerns about extending the grace period in 

nonattainment areas that had not yet attained the applicable NAAQS.
exv10w53



 








	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.53




SUMMARY SHEET:  2008 CHARLES J. CAMPISE ANNUAL BASE SALARY




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Title	 	2008 Base Salary
	Charles J. Campise

	 	Senior Vice President-Finance and
Accounting and Chief Accounting
Officer
	 	$	210,000
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3394 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3394

   To address fee disclosure requirements under the Electronic Fund 
 Transfer Act, to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect 
to information provided to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2012

  Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Brown of 
  Ohio, Mr. Johanns, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Tester, and Mrs. 
Hagan) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
        to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To address fee disclosure requirements under the Electronic Fund 
 Transfer Act, to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect 
to information provided to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.

    Section 904(d)(3)(B) of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. 
1693b(d)(3)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in the subparagraph heading, by striking 
        ``requirements.--'' and inserting ``requirement.--'';
            (2) by striking clause (i);
            (3) by striking ``(ii) On the screen.--''; and
            (4) by striking ``, except that during the period 
        beginning'' and all that follows through the end and inserting 
        a period.

SEC. 2. FDIA AMENDMENTS REGARDING DISCLOSURES TO THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER 
              FINANCIAL PROTECTION.

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.) is 
amended--
            (1) in section 11(t)(2)(A) (12 U.S.C. 1821(t)(2)(A)), by 
        inserting after clause (v) the following:
                            ``(vi) The Bureau of Consumer Financial 
                        Protection.''; and
            (2) in section 18(x) (12 U.S.C. 1828(x))--
                    (A) by inserting ``the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
                Protection,'' before ``any Federal banking agency'' 
                each place that term appears; and
                    (B) by striking ``such agency'' each place that 
                term appears and inserting ``such Bureau, agency''.
                                 <all>
```
Unassociated Document



Exhibit 4.8.52 -Self-Control Components - Product catalogue of S7-300 controller
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

d1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

146934(42)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146934

COA: 307736 

Wayne CC: 11-007505-FC

DOUGLAS ALBERT REESE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2013 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
ex101.htm












GLOBAL RESOURCE ENERGY, INC.


848 N. Rainbow Blvd., #2167,


Las Vegas, NV   89107







January 26, 2012







Mr. James Brooks


Patedma Group Corp.,


DBA Kardings America


952 North Western Ave.,


Los Angeles, CA 90029







Re:           Dongguan City Cled Optoelectronic Co., Ltd.


Assignment of Distributor Agreement







Dear Mr. Brooks:







THIS ASSIGNMENT OF DISTRIBUTOR AGREEMENT (the “Assignment”) entered into this 26th day of January, 2012, by and between Patedma Group Corp.,DBA Kardings America whose address is 952 North Western Ave., Los Angeles, CA (the “Assignor”) and Global Resource Energy, Inc. whose address is 848 N. Rainbow Blvd., #2167, Las Vegas, NV 89107 (the “Assignee”);







IN CONSIDERATION of 1,000,000 restricted shares of the Common Stock of Assignee to be issued and delivered up the execution of this Agreement, the Assignor does hereby sell, assign, transfer and convey to the Assignee, its successors and assigns, all of the Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Distibutor Agreement appended hereto as Schedule A  (the “Agreement”):







2.           The Assignor further hereby covenants that it will, at any time, upon the request of the Assignee, execute and deliver to the Assignee any new or confirmatory instruments and to perform any other acts which the Assignee may reasonably request in order to fully assign and transfer to and vest in the Assignee, all of the Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Agreement.







3.           This Assignment shall include all of the Assignor’s rights to all income, royalties, and payments now or hereafter due and payable pursuant to the Agreement and the operations undertaken by the Assignee under the Agreement, as fully and entirely as the same would have been held and enjoyed by the Assignor if this sale and assignment had not been made.







4.           The Assignor acknowledges and agrees to obtain the consent of Dongguan City Cled Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. pursuant to the Distributor Agreement.







5.           The Assignee agrees to abide by all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement and shall not breech any of the terms of the Agreement.







INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK











  





1











  








DATED this 26TH day of January, 2012







GLOBAL RESOURCE ENERGY, INC.


(Assignee)







Per:


 


Name:


Title:


I have authority to bind the Company.












Patedma Group Corp.,


DBA Kardings America


(Assignor)







Per:







Name:


Title:


I have authority to bind the Company.











  





2











  











  





3











  






 







  





4











  









 




  





5











  






 







  





6











  






 







  





7
#### Melvin DE VAN DANIEL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dennis DUFFY; David Blough; Julius Lewis; Scott Crawford; Charles Arellano; Steve Johnson; Edward Chavez; Mark Lewis, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-16278.

D.C. No. CV-00-02604-GEB/JFM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2004.*

Decided May 24, 2004.

Melvin De Van Daniel, Stockton, CA, pro se.

Richard W. Taylor, Shelley L. Green, Stockton, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before SNEED, SKOPIL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Melvin De Van Daniel appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Stockton police officers and various employees in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He claims his constitutional rights were violated by the use of excessive force and the deliberate indifference to his medical needs while he was in custody. We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on De Van Daniel’s claims. The affidavits submitted in support of summary judgment consistently describe De Van Daniel as combative, uncooperative, and violent. The medical records disclose that De Van Daniel suffered only a slight abrasion to his wrist. De Van Daniel offered no evidence other than his own allegations to controvert this evidence. Consequently, there are no triable issues as to excessive force or inattention to medical needs. *See Gibson v. County of Washoe,*290 F.3d 1175, 1198 (9th Cir.2002); *White v. Pierce County,*797 F.2d 812, 816 (9th Cir.1986).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19604-19605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9741]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts; Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that one meeting 
of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held by teleconference at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506 as follows (ending time is 
approximate):
    AccessAbility (application review): May 14, 2009. This meeting, 
from 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., will be closed.
    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial 
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in

[[Page 19605]]

confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of February 28, 2008, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.
    Further information with reference to these meetings can be 
obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel 
Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, 
[email protected], or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: April 24, 2009.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. E9-9741 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                            4671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    15000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               (19671)
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (57005)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   69125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            77100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         69105
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     69125
<SALES>                                          33109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 33109
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     7795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 29575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4260)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Rodger L. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Knology,Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Knology, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: August 11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      35,526
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,526
<PP&E>                                     852,305
<DEPRECIATION>                              67,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             706,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      656,144
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    19,122
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               706,301
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              341,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (114,038)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (1,938)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (451,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (451,555)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.240)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.240)


</TABLE>