# UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX



# Ms. Jasmine Mehta, Chief

Bureau of Air Quality Planning 75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco " CA 94105

· 3901 

# DEC 1 1 £013

Nevada Division of Environmental Protection

90 I South Stewart Street, Suite 400 I

Carson City, Nevada 8970 I

Dear Ms. Mehta:

Thank you for your submission of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection 's (NDEP's)

2013 Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan in June

, 2013. We have reviewed the submitted

document based on the requirements set forth under 40 CFR 58. Based on the infonnation

provided in the plan

, EPA approves all portions of the network plan except those s pecifically

identified below

.

Please note that we cannot approve portions of the annual network plan for which the

infonnation in the plan is insufficient to judge whether the requirement has be e n met

, or for

which the infonnation, as described

, does not meet the requirements as specified in 40 CFR

58.10 and the associated appendices. EPA Region 9 also cannot approve portions of the plan for

which the EPA Administrator h as not delegated approval authority to the regional offices.

Accordingly, the first enclosure 

# (A. Ann ual Monitoring Network Plan Items where EPA is Not

Taking Action) provides a listing of specific items of your agency's annua l monitoring network

plan where EPA i s not taking action. The second enclosure 

# (B. Additional It ems Requiring

A tt en tion ) is a listing of additiona l items in the plan that EPA wishes to bring to your agency's

attention.

The third enclosure (C. 

# Annual Monitoring Network Plan Checklist) is the checklist EPA used to

review your plan for overall items that are required to be included in the annual network plan

along with our assessment of whether the plan submitted by your agency addresses those

requirements.

The first two enclosures highlight a subset of the more extensive list of items reviewed in the

third e nclosure. All comments conveyed via this letter (and enclosures) should be addressed

(thro u gh corrections within the plan, additional infonnation being included

, or discu ssio n) in

next year's annual monitoring net\vork plan.

P rinud on H tryd t d P aptrIf you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed comments , please feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4534 or Gwen Yoshimura at (415) 947-4134. Enclosures :

Sincerely ,**ull~~~** g __ , Meredith Kurpius , Mana :;; O Air Quality Analysis Offic e A. Annual Monitoring Network Plan Items wher e EPA is Not Taking Action B . Additional Items Requiring Attention C. Annual Monitoring Network Plan Checklist cc : Daren Winkelman , NDEP Mike Elges , NDEP

# A

. Annual Monitoring Network Plan Items where EPA is Not Taking Action

We are not acting on the portions of annual network plans where either EPA Region 9lacks the

authority to approve specific items of the plan

, or EPA has determined that a requirement is

either not met or information in the plan is insufficient to judge whether the requirement has

been met.

• EPA identified items in your agency's annual monitoring network plan where a

requirement was not being met or information in the plan was insufficient to judge

whether the requirement was being met based on 40 CFR 58

. 10 and the associated

appendices

. Therefore, we are not acting on the following items:

Item Checklist Row Issue

Precision/ Accuracy Reports 28 Insufficient to judge

Annual data certification 29 Insufficient to judge

Document how agency would 26 Not meeting requirement

provide for review ofPM2

. s

monitoring network changes

Additional information for each of these items may be found for the row listed in column 2

, in

the third enclosure (C. 

# Annual Monitoring Network Plan Checklist).B. Additional Items Requiring Attention • [Row 2] On page 20, the Carson City Armory's purpose is described as "to determine typical concentration/population exposure ." In future plans, please explain how this reconciles with a "max concentration" site type for the ozone monitor. • [Row 48] The Glen Oaks PMw site type is listed as

" typical concentration/population oriented"

· on page 29. We recommend selecting site types that are included in AQS and Appendix D, such as population exposure. • [Row 56] The design values provided in the plan are from 2011. Please include more current design value information in future plans, or note why more current information is not available. • [Row 66] As NDEP's PM 2.s network is new, please evaluate in your next network assessment whether your network includes a site at neighborhood scale in an area of expected maximum concentration.C.ANNUALMON1TORINGNETWORKPLANCHECKLIST(Updated11/26/2013)Year:2013Agency:NevadaDivisionofEnvironmentalProtection(NDEP)40CFR58.1O(a)(I)requiresthateachAnnualNetworkPlan(ANP)includeinformationregardingthefollowingtypesofmonitors:SLAMSmonitoringstationsincludingFRM,FEM,andARMmonitorsthatarepartofSLAMS,NCorestations,STNstations,Statespeciationstations,SPMstations,and/or,inserious,severeandextremeozonenonattainrnentareas,PAMSstations,andSPMmonitoringstations.40CFR58.1O(a)(1)furtherdirectsthat,"Theplanshallinclude·astatementofpurposesforeachmonitorandevidencethatsitingandoperationofeachmonitormeetstherequirementsofappendicesA,C,0,andEofthispart,whereapplicable."Onthisbasis,reviewoftheANPsisbasedontherequirementslistedin58.10alongwiththoseinAppendicesA,C,D,andE.EPARegion9willnottakeactiontoapproveordisapproveanyitemforwhichPart58grantsapprovalauthoritytotheAdministratorratherthantheRegionalAdministrators,butwewilldoachecktoseeiftherequiredinformationisincludedandcorrect.TheitemsrequiringapprovalbytheAdministratorare:PAMS,NCore,andSpeciation(STN/CSN).Pleasenotethatthischecklistsummarizesmanyoftherequirementsof40CFRPart58,butdoesnot.substituteforthoserequirements,nordoitscontentsprovideabindingdeterminationofcompliancewiththoserequirements.Thechecklistissubjecttorevisioninthefutureandwewelcomecommentsonitscontentsandstructure.Key:Whhe=meetstherequirement.Yellow=requirementisnotmet,orinformationisinsufficienttomakeadetermination.Actionrequestedinnextyear'splanoroutsidetheANP=----process.(itemslistedinEnclosureA)=itemrequiresattentioninordertoimprovenextyear'splan(itemslistedinEnclosureB)ANPrequirementCitationWastheinfoDoestheNoteswithin40submitted?1IfinformationCFR58yes,page#s.provided3meetFlagifthereq?4incorrece?I.SubmitplanbyJuly!5158.10(a)(l)YesYesPlanreceived6/27/20132.StatementofpurposeforeachmonitorSS.lO(a){l)YesYesOnpage20,theCarsonCityArmory'spurposeisdescribedas"todeterminetypicalconcentration/populationexposure."Infutureplans,pleaseexplainhowthisreconcileswitha"max-----concentration"sitetype.fortheozonemonitor.3.30-daypubliccommentIinspectionperiod'58.10(a)(!),YesYesCoverletterindicatesnocommentswerereceived.58.10(a)(2)4.ModificationstoSLAMSnetwork-casewhenweare58.10(a)(2)NANAnotapprovingactualsystemmodifications(i.e.,wewilldoitoutsidetheANPprocess6)58.10(e)5.ModificationstoSLAMSnetwork-casewhenweare58.10(a)(2)Yes,pg6-7YesDetailedsiteinformationforthenewPM2.5SLAMSapprovingactualsystemmodificationsper58.14(c)58.10(b)(5)site(primaryandcollocated,startdate3/1/2013)in58.1O(e)CarsonCityprovidedonpgs20-21.EPAapproves58.14(c)thisnewSLAMSsitesaspartofthenetworkplanapproval.6.Doesplanincludedo_cumentation(e.g.,attachedYes-Appendix CYesApprovalforCarsonCity03attachedasAppendixC.approvalletter)forsystemmodificationsthathaveShouldNDEPmovethePMI0MansemonitortothebeenapprovedsincelastANPapproval?NycCountySchoolDistrictinthefuture,pleaseattachtheapprovalJetterintheapplicableannualnetworkplan.7.NCoresiteoperational(by1/l/2011)58.10(a)(3)NANDEPdoesnothaveanNCoresite8.Pbsitefor0.5-1.0tpysourcesoperational(by58.10(a)(4)NANDEPdoesnothaveanyrequiredPbsites12/27/2011)9.N02planforarea-wideandRA40sitessubmittedby58.10(a)(5)NANDEPdoesnothaveanyrequiredarea-wideorRA407/1/2012N02sites10.N02area-wideandRA40sitesoperationalby58.10(a)(5)NASeecomment,row91/1/20131Responseoptions:NA(NotApplicable),Yes,No,lncomplete,Incorrect.Theresponses"Incomplete"and"Incorrect"assumethatsomeinformationhasbeenprovided.2Tothebestofourknowledge.3Assumingtheinfom1ationiscorrect4Responseoptions:NA(NotApplicable)-[reason],Yes,No,InsufficienttoJudge.5Theaffectedstateorlocalagencymustdocumenttheprocessforobtainingpubliccommentandincludeanycommentsreceivedthroughthepublicnotificationprocesswithintheirsubmittedplan.6See58.14(c)2ANPrequirementCitationWastheinfoDoestheNoteswithin40submitted?1lfinformationCFR58yes,page#s.provided3meetFlagifthereq?4incorrect2?II.N02planfornear-roadsitessubmittedby7/1/201358.10(a)(5)NASeecomment,row912.S02sitesoperational(byIII/2013)58.10(a)(6)NANDEPdoesnothaveanyrequiredS02sitesand58.13(d)13.AQSsiteidentificationnumberforeachsite58.10(b)(l)Yes,pgs11-39Yes14.Locationofeachsite:streetaddressandgeographic58.10(b)(2)Yes,pgs11-39Yescoordinates15.Samplingandanalysismethod(s)foreachmeasured58.10(b)(3)Yes,pgs11-39Yesparameter16.Anyproposalstoremoveormoveamonitoring58.10(b)(5)Yes,pgs6-7YesNoplanstomoveorremoveamonitoringstationstationwithinaperiodof18monthsfollowingplanwithin18months.submittal17.Scaleofrepresentativenessforeachmonitoras58.10(b)(6);Yes,pgs11-39YesdefinedinAppendixDAppD18.Identificationofsitessuitableandsitesnotsuitable58.10(b)(7)Yes,pgs11-39YesforcomparisontotheannualPM2.5NAAQSasdescribedinPart58.3019.MSA,CBSA,CSAorotherarearepresentedbythe58.10(b)(8)Yes,pgs11-39Yesmonitor20.DesignationofanyPbmonitorsaseithersource-58.JO(b)(9)NANANoPbmonitorsorientedornon-source-oriented21.Anysource-orientedPbsiteforwhichawaiverhas58.10(b)(IO)NANANoPbmonitorsbeengrantedbyEPARA22.AnyPbmonitorforwhichawaiverhasbeen58.10(b)(!I)NANANoPbmonitorsrequestedorgrantedbyEPARAforuseofPb-PM10inlieuofPb-TSP23.IdentificationofrequiredN02monitorsaseithernear-58.10(b)(l2)NANANoN02monitorsroadorarea-wide24.IdentificationofanyPM2.sFEMsand/orARMsnot58.10(b)(13)NANAeligibletobecomparedtotheNAAQS(NoteI:must58.1l(e)includerequireddataassessment.)(Note2:RequiredSLAMSmustmonitorPM2.swithNAAQScomparablemonitorattherequiredsamplefrequency.)25.ForSPMslistedasnon-regulatory,notethestartDate58.20(c)NANANonon-regulatorySPMsofFRM/FEMIARMatSPM.If>24months,andmonitoriseligibleforcomparisontotheNAAQSper58.11(e)and58.30,theagencymust____'-------··------3ANPrequirementCitationWastheinfoDoestheNoteswithin40submitted?1IfinformationCFR58yes,page#s.provided3meetFlagifthereq?4incorrect2?infonnationthatAppA,CorErequirementswerenotmet.26.Documenthowstatesandlocalagenciesprovidefor58.IO(c)NoInsufficientTheplanshouldincludeafewsentencesstatinghowthereviewofchangestoaPM2.5monitoringnetworkinfonnationtoNDEPwouldprovideforthereviewofchangestothethatimpactthelocationofaviolatingPM2.5monitor.judgePM2.5monitoringnetworkthatimpactthelocationofaviolatingPM2.5monitor,shouldtheeventarise,per40CFR58.10(c).27.Doestheplanincludearequestforapprovalforand58.11(a)(2)NANANorequestforanalternativetoAppendixA.alternativetoappendixArequirementsforSPMsoperatingaFRM/FEMIARMwhichalsomeetsappendixE?28.Precision/AccuracyreportssubmittedtoAQS58.16(a);Yes,pg3InsufficientInadditiontodescribingthegeneralprocessforAppA,1.3infonnationtocertificationandsubmittalofprecision/accuracyand5.1.1judgereports,pleaseprovideastatementthatthereportshavebeensubmittedandcertificationcompletedfortheyearinquestion.IdeallyincludethelastavailabledateofsubmittaVcertification.Ifthepreviouscalendaryear'ssubmittaldateisnotavailable,pleaseindicatetheanticipatedsubmittaldateforthatyear'sdataaswellasthesubmitteddatefortwoyearsprior.(Forexample,foraplanputoutforpubliccommentinApril2014,theplancouldincludetheactualsubmittaldateforCY2012dataandnoteananticipatedsubmittaldateofMayI,2014forCY2013data.)29.Annualdatacertificationsubmitted58.15Yes, pg3InsufficientInadditiontodescribingthegeneralprocessforApp.A1.3infonnationtocertificationandsubmittalofprecision/accuracyjudgereports,pleaseprovideastatementthatthereportshavebeensubmittedandcertificationcompletedfortheyearinquestion.IdeallyincludethedateofsubmittaVcertification.Ifthepreviouscalendar year'ssubmittaldateisnotavailable,pleaseindicatetheanticipatedsubmittaldateforthatyear'sdataaswellasthesubmitteddatefortwoyearsprior.(Forexample,foraplanputoutforpubliccommentinApril2014,couldincludetheactualsubmittaldateforCY2012dataandnoteananticipatedsubmittaldate-_()fMayI,2014forCY2013data.)4ANPrequirementCitationWastheinfoDocstheNoteswithin40submitted?'IfinformationCFR58yes,page #s.provided3meetFlagifthereq?4incorrect2?30.FrequencyofflowrateverificationformanualPMAppA3.3.2Yes,pg20-21YesMonthly(collocatedPM2.5atCarsonCityArmory,samplersauditpg21)31.FrequencyofflowrateverificationforautomatedPMAppA3.2.3Yes,pgs11-39YesMonthly(allPMinstrumentsexceptthecollocatedanalyzersauditPM2.5atCarsonCityArmoryarecontinuous)32.Frequencyofone-pointflowrateverificationforPhAppANANANoPhmonitorssamplersaudit3.3.4.133.Frequencyofone-pointQCcheck(gaseous)App.A3.2.1Yes,pgs11-39YesPerfonnedeverytwoweeks34.DateoflastAnnualPerfonnanceEvaluation(gaseous)App.A3.2.2Yes,pgs11-39Yes35.Datesoflasttwosemi-annualflowrateauditsforPMAppA,3.2.4Yes,pgs11-39YesNotprovidedforIMPROVE(nmbyNPS)monitorsand3.3.336.Datesoflasttwosemi-annualflowrateauditsforPhAppANANANoPbmonitorsmonitors3.3.4.137.PM2.scollocationAppA3.2.5YesYesISLAMS,ISPMBAMI020.CollocatedFRMatSLAMSCarsonCity Armory.38.DesignationofaprimarymonitorifthereismorethanNeedtoYes,pg20YesCarsonCityArmoryPM2.5POC2identifiedastheonemonitorforapollutantatasite.detennineQACollocatedmonitor.Noothersiteswithmorecollocationthanonemonitor for apollutant.39.Distancebetweencollocatedmonitors(Note:waiverApp.AYes,pg21Yes3metersbetweenprimaryFEMandcollocatedFRMrequestorthedateofpreviouswaiverapprovalmust3.2.5.6andatCarsonCityArmory.beincludedifthedistancedeviatesfrom3.2.6.3requirement.)40.ManualPM10methodcollocationmet?(note:AppA3.3.1NANANonerequired,asNDEPdoesnothaveanymanualcontinuousPMI0doesnothavethisrequirement)PMIOinstruments(onlyBAMI020s).41.PbcollocationAppANANANonerequired,as.NDEPdoesnothaveanyPb3.3.4.3monitors42.PM10-2.5collocation(note:onlyappliestoFresnoandApp A3.3.6NANANoPMI0-2.5sitesPhoenixNCoresites)43.Instrument/monitoringmethodcodeforeachmonitor:AppC2.4.1.2YesYesisitreportedproperly?Isitreportedcorrectly(i.e.,appropriatemethodcodeforregulatorymonitors)?44.ForagenciesthatsharemonitoringresponsibilitiesinAppD2(e)NANANDEPdoesnotmonitorinareaswithlocalairanMSNCSA:doeseachaffectedStateorlocalmonitoringagencies.agencymeetfullmonitoringrequirementsorisanagreementbetweentheaffectedagenciesandtheEPARegionalAdministratorinplace?45.StartdateforeachmonitorRequiredtoYes,pgs11-39Yesdetennineif5ANPrequirementCitationWastheinfoDoestheNoteswithin40submitted?'lfinformationCFR58yes,page#s.provided3meetFlagifthereq?4incorrect2?otherreq.(e.g.,min#andcolloc)aremel46.InstrumentmonitortypeforeachmonitorRequiredtoYes,pgs11-39Yesdetermineifotherreq.(e.g.,min#andcolloc)aremet47.MonitoringobjectiveforeachinstrumentAppD1.1Yes,pgs11-39Yes58.10(b)(6)48.SitetypeforeachinstrumentAppD1.1.1Yes,pgs11-39Yes,butincorrectOnpg29,dteGlenOaksPMI0sitetypeislistedasinoneinstance"typicalconcentration/popUlationoriented."Werecommendusingpopulationexposureinstead,tomatch&hesitetypesdescn"bedinAQSandAppendixD.-49.instrumentparametercodeforeachinstrumentRequiredtoYes,pgs11-39Yesdetermineifotherreq.(e.g.,min#andcolloc)aremet50.instrumentparameteroccurrencecodeforeachRequiredtoYes,pgs11-39Yesinstrumentdetermineifotherreq.(e.g.,min#andcolloc)aremet51.Samplingseasonforozone(note:dateofwaiver58.10(b)(4)Yes,pgs11-39YesWaiverattached.approvalmustbeincludedifthesamplingseasonAppD,4.1(i)deviatesfromrequirement)52.SamplingscheduleforPM2.s-appliestoyear-round58.10(b)(4)YesYesSampleyear-roundforPM2.5.SingleFRMisaandseasonalsamplingschedules(note:dateofwaiver58.12(d)collocatedmonitorrunningonaI:6dayschedule.approvalmustbeincludedifthesamplingseasonAppD 4.7deviatesfromrequirement)EPAl:lowchart53.SamplingscheduleforPM1058.10(b)(4)YesYesAllcontinuousmonitorsoperatingyearround.6ANPrequirementCitationWastheinfoDoestheNoteswithin40submitted?1IfinformationCFR58yes,page#s.provided3meetFlagifthereq?4incorrece?58.12(e)App04.654.SamplingscheduleforPb58.10(b)(4)NANANoPbmonitors58.12(b)App04.555.SamplingscheduleforPM10.2.558.10(b)(4)NANANoPMI0-2.5monitors58.12(t)App04.856.Minimum#ofmonitorsfor03[Note:shouldbeAppD.4.l(a)YesYesDVsprovidedarefrom20t1foraplansubmittedinsupportedbyMSAID,MSApopulation,DV,#and2013.PleaseincludemorecurrentDVinfumnationinmonitors,and#requiredmonitors](seefootnote)7TableD-2futureplans.ornotewhymoreCUITentinformationisnotavailable.57.Identificationofmax.cone.03monitor(s)App04.1(b)Yes,pg20YesCarsonCityArmory,pg20,isidentifiedasamaxconcentrationsite.58.Minimummonitoringrequirementsmetfornear-roadApp04.3.2YesYesNonerequired.TheareasNDEPmonitorsdonotN02(2014startdate)requireN02monitorsatthislime.59.Minimummonitoringrequirementsmetforarea-wideApp04.3.3YesYesNonerequired.TheareasNDEPmonitorsdonotN02requireN02monitorsatthistime.60.MinimummonitoringrequirementsmetforRA-40App04.3.4YesYesNonerequired.TheareasNDEPmonitorsdonotN02requireN02monitorsatthistime.61.MinimummonitoringrequirementsmetforsolApp04.4YesYesNonerequired.TheareasNDEPmonitorsdonot[Note:OnlymonitorsconsideredtoberequiredrequireS02monitorsatthistime.SLAMsareeligibletobecountedtowardsmeetingminimummonitoringrequirements.l62.MinimummonitoringrequirementsmetforPb[Note:App04.5YesYesNonerequired.TheareasNDEPmonitorsdonotOnlymonitorsconsideredtoberequiredSLAMsare58.13(a)requirePbmonitorsatthistime.eligibletobecountedtowardsmeetingminimummonitoringrequirements.]63.Minimum#ofmonitorsforPM2.5[NoteI:shouldbeAppO,YesYessupportedbyMSAID,MSApopulation,OV,#4.7.1(a)andmonitors,and#requiredmonitors][Note2:OnlyTable0-5monitorsconsideredtoberequiredSLAMsareeligibletobecountedtowardsmeetingminimummon--7OnlymonitorsconsideredtoberequiredSLAMsareeligibletobecountedtowardsmeetingminimummonitoringrequirements.lnaddition,ozonemonitorsthatdonotmeettrafficcmmt/distancerequirementstobeneighborhoodscale (40CFR58AppendixE,TableE-1)cannotbecountedtowardsminimummonitoringrequirements.7ANPrequirementCitationWastheinfoDoestheNoteswithin40submitted?1IfinformationCFR58yes,page#s.provided3meetFlagifthereq?4.incorrece?64.OptionalPM2•5NetworkClarifications:ProvidealistNeedtoNANAofrequiredsitesifitdoesnotincludeallSLAMS.assessseveral[Note:defaultwillassumeallSLAMSareconsideredrequirementsrequiredsites.]65.RequiredPM2.ssitesrepresentarea-wideairqualityAppDYesYes4.7.l(b)66.ForPM25,isatleastonesiteatneighborhoodorAppDIncompleteIusufficienttoAsNDEP'sPM2.5networkisnew,pleaseevaluateinlargerscaleinanareaofexpectedmaximum4.7.1(b)(l)judgeyournextnetworkassessmentwhetheryourconcentrationmonitoringnetworkincludesasiteatneigbbothoodscaleinanareaofexPectedmaximumconcentration.67.IfadditionalSLAMSPM2.srequired,istherea siteinAppDNANANoadditionalrequiredPM2.5sitesatthistime.anareaofpoorairquality4.7.l(b)(2)68.MinimummonitoringrequirementsforcontinuousAppD4.7.2YesYesPM2.s69. RequirementsforPM2•5backgroundandtransportAppD4.7.3Yes,pg4YesStaterequirementforatleastoneregionalIsitesbackground/transportsitesatisfiedbyJarbidgeIMPROVEsite.70.ArePM2.5ChemicalSpeciationrequirementsmetforAppD4.7.4YesYesNonerequired.NDEPdoesnothaveanyrequiredofficialSTNsites?chemicalspeciationsites.71.Minimum#ofmonitorsforPM10AppD,4.6YesYesNonerequiredperApp.D,however,4arerequired(a)andTablethroughaMOU.D-472.MinimummonitoringrequirementsmetforPM10.2.sAppD4.8YesYesNonerequired.mass73.DistanceofsitefromnearestroadApp£6Yes,pgs11-39Yes74.TrafficcountofnearestroadAppEYes,pgs11-39Yes75.GroundcoverAppE3(a)Yes,pgs11-39Yes76.ProbeheightApp£2Yes,pgs11-39Yes77.DistancefromsupportingstructureApp£2Yes,pgs11-39Yes78.DistancefromobstructionsonroofAppE4(b)Yes,pgs11-39Yes79.DistancefromobstructionsnotonroofAppE4(a)Yes,pgs11-39YesRecommendnotinghowhightheobstacleisabovetheprobeinadditiontodistance.80.DistancefromtreesApp£511-39Yes81.DistancetofurnaceorincineratorflueAppE3(b)Yes,pgs11-39Yes82.UnrestrictedairflowAppE,4(a)Yes,pgs11-39Yesand4(b)83.Probematerial(ifapplicable)App£9Yes,pgs11-39Yes8

# ANP requirement Cit ation Was the info Does the Notes I



# within

40 submitted? 1 

# If information

CFR58 yes, page #s. provided 3



# meet

Flag if the req?"'

incorrect 2 

# ?

84. Residence time (if app licabl e) AppE9 Yes, pgs 11-39 Yes 

# 9PublicCommentsonAnnualNetworkPlanWerecommentssubmittedtotheS/L/Tagencyduringthepubliccommentperiod?Nocommentsweresubmitted.·Ifno,skiptheremainingquestions.Ifyes:•Wereanyofthecommentssubstantive?oIfyes,whichones?oExplainbasisfordeterminationifanycommentswereconsiderednotsubstantive:•Didtheagencyrespondtothesubstantivecomments?olfyes,wastheresponseadequate?•DothesubstantivecommentsrequireseparateEPAresponse(i.e.,agencyresponsewasn'tadequate)?•Arethesectionsoftheannualnetworkplanthatreceivedsubstantivecommentsapprovableafterconsiderationofcomments?oIfyes,providerationale:10