CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Feather River Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 3.22 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended October 6, 2014

Rule Title(s): Stationary Internal Combustion Engines

Date Submitted to ARB: October 24, 2014

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Adopted 6/1/2009

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Timothy Mitro Phone Number: (530) 634-7659 ext 208 E-mail Address: tmitro@fraqmd.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The District corrected the deficiency as identified by the US EPA in the Limited Approval Limited Disapproval. The 

language allowing for alternative NOx analyzers, as approved by the APCO, has been completely stricken from 

the rule. Furthermore, the District added EPA Method 18 as an approval test method for VOC.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission 

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: Yuba and Sutter Counties

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible):

N/A
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 43

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) D.1 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: D.2.b

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): D Work Practice Standards in Section(s): D

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): F Reporting Requirements in Section(s): F
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: 

5/1/2002