alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### VICTORIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION



### 2014 Board ojDirec(ors 

# • Thomas.4. Schmidt

Chail1/JQI/ 

## J",f!/'YOII I"ice-Chairnwn 

### Dan Easton Treasurer 

### Dennis Palil10 hnmediuce Pas! Chairman Ch"annelfe GaFrell t,xecufire Board 

### 80bby Jacob I!):ccufin~ Board 

### William II. fJIanchard Tom Butler E/(OI1 

### Calhoun Cally Fromme IlusseflMarshall DavidMdarry Jon Neu: 

### Judge Donald H Pozzi Janis SCOZ! 

### Stephen 1.17umes MayS, 2014 Mr. Michael F. Martin 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation Office of Aviation Analysis 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, D.C. 20S90 Dear Mr. Martin On behalf of the Victoria Economic Development Corporation's (VEDq Board of Directors, please accept this letter in support of the decision made by the Victoria Regional Airport Commission 

### and County Commissioner's Courtto request entrance into the Alternative EssentialAirService Program for Victoria and our surrounding communities. VEDC isthe contracted marketing agent for the City of Victoria and Victoria County. We work to 

### recruit new industryto our community for the purpose of creating primary jobs and expanding the tax base;and to maintain existingbusinessesand assistthem with expansions.The clientswe attract are highly dependent on the availability of local commercial air transportation for their 

### operations, and the strength ofviable commercial air serviceinour community isimportant to future development and job creation. We support the decision made by the Commissioners to partner directly with a carrier that most closely matches the needs of our community. Entrance into the Alternative Essential Air Service program would allow them this opportunity. I appreciate your consideration in this important 

### matter. Pleasecontact me ifyour haveanyquestions or concerns. Sincerely, 

# t1:gJ~ D. Dale Fowler, CEcD 

### President

700 N Main, Suite 104 Victoria, Texas 77901 361-48S-3190 vedc@victoriaedc.com
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Vincent C. Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Quest Software, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quest Software, Inc.



|                        |  |        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 25, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/    Vincent C. Smith
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Vincent C. Smith       
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/s/
Ron Ruskowsky


Ron
Ruskowsky


Chief
Financial Officer


November
20, 2009
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VIOLA GIGER
, Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 685

[ February 13, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barry J. Stone, Senior , Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE15011233

.

Viola Giger, Hollywood, pro se

.

Alan M. Pierce of Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)

.

W ARNER
, D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.11



 





Exhibit
10.11




          AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO THE GNC ACQUISITION HOLDINGS INC. 2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN, dated as of
February 12, 2008 (this “Amendment”).




W I T N E S S E T H:




          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of GNC Acquisition Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) has
previously approved the GNC Acquisition Holdings Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”);




          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan pursuant to, and in accordance with,
Article XI of the Plan;




          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the holders of a majority of the outstanding Common Stock
of the Company have approved the following amendment to the Plan;




          NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Amendment agree as follows:




     1. Amendment to the Number of Shares That May Be Issued Under the Plan. The first
sentence of Section 4.1 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:




     “The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued or used for reference
purposes under the Plan or with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan shall
not exceed 10,419,178 shares (subject to any increase or decrease pursuant to
Section 4.2), which may be either authorized and unissued Common Stock or Common
Stock held in or acquired for the treasury of the Company or both.”



     2. Use of Capitalized Terms. Unless specifically set forth in this Amendment,
capitalized terms used shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Plan.



     3. Terms of the Plan Control. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, nothing
contained in this Amendment shall be deemed to limit, amend, modify or waive any of the rights,
terms or obligations under the Plan.
Assignment and Assumption of Rights



 Exhibit 10.24 
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF RIGHTS UNDER 
 PURCHASE AGREEMENT

  
  

 
 For good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, THE PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (“Assignor”), Buyer under that certain Purchase Agreement dated September 23, 2011, as same may
have been or may hereafter be amended (“Agreement”), with DDRM Center Pointe Plaza I LLC, DDRM Center Pointe Plaza II LLC and DDRM Southampton Village LLC, as Sellers, hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to (a) CENTERPOINT STATION
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest under the Agreement to the shopping center property described therein as the “South Carolina Property” located in Easley, Pickens County, South
Carolina, more particularly described in the Agreement, including, but not limited to, its right, title and interest in and to a prorata portion of the Deposit (defined in the Agreement) corresponding to the proportion of the Purchase Price (defined
in the Agreement) allocated to the South Carolina Property, and (b) SOUTHAMPTON STATION LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest under the Agreement to the shopping center property described
therein as the “Georgia Property” located in Tyrone, Fayette County, Georgia, more particularly described in the Agreement, including, but not limited to, its right, title and interest in and to a prorata portion of the Deposit
corresponding to the proportion of the Purchase Price allocated to the Georgia Property. 
  

									
	Dated: October 14, 2011	 		 	 THE PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP LLC,
 an Ohio limited liability company

					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 PHILLIPS EDISON LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP,
 a Delaware limited
partnership,
 Managing Member

					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 PHILLIPS EDISON & COMPANY, INC., 
 a Maryland corporation, General Partner

					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Robert F. Myers
		 		 		 		 	Robert F. Myers, Chief Operating Officer


  








 The undersigned hereby accept the foregoing assignments and hereby assume and agree to
perform all of Assignor’s obligations under the Agreement and hereby release, indemnify and hold Assignor harmless from any loss, cost, liability or expense which may be suffered by Assignor in connection with such Agreement, except for any
such loss, cost, liability or expense resulting from the acts of Assignor in connection with the Agreement taken prior to the date of this Assignment without the applicable authorization or consent of the undersigned. 

 

									
	Dated: October 14, 2011	 		 	 CENTERPOINT STATION LLC,
 a Delaware limited liability company

					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ R. Mark Addy
		 		 		 		 	R. Mark Addy, President
		 		 		 		 	
				
		 		 		 	 SOUTHAMPTON STATION LLC,
 a Delaware limited liability company

					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ R. Mark Addy 
		 		 		 		 	R. Mark Addy, President


  
 2
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Xcorporeal, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kelly J. McCrann,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Kelly J.
      McCrannKelly
      J. McCrannChief
      Executive Officer andChairman
      of the Board




Date:
August 13, 2009
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0578 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32004D0578

**2004/578/EC: Council Decision of 29 April 2004 on the conclusion of the Framework Agreement between the European Community and the European Space Agency **

*
Official Journal L 261 , 06/08/2004 P. 0063 - 0063 *

Council Decision of 29 April 2004 on the conclusion of the Framework Agreement between the European Community and the European Space Agency (2004/578/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 170, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(1),

Whereas:

(1) The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community an Agreement with the European Space Agency.

(2) The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Community on 25 November 2003 subject to its possible conclusion at a later date.

(3) This Agreement should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the European Space Agency is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to deposit on behalf of the Community the act of approval, as provided for in Article 12(1) of the Framework Agreement, in order to express the consent of the Community to be bound.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2004 .

For the Council

The President

M. Mc Dowell

(1) Opinion delivered on 20 April 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VIOLA GIGER,

Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-685

[February 13, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE15011233.

Viola Giger, Hollywood, pro se.

Alan M. Pierce of Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150 (Fla. 1979).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JASON DANIEL ARTZ,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 470 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 28th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40992

Summary Calendar

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Plaintiff

v.

STEVE MORRISS

Defendant - Appellee

v.

TARECO PROPERTIES, INC, Garnishor

Movant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:00-MC-24

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tareco Properties, Inc. petitioned the district court to order Steve Morriss

to turn over assets and properties for the satisfaction of an earlier judgment.

Tareco now appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for turnover with

respect to some of these properties and assets. Tareco also appeals the district

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 11, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
2

court’s denial of a preliminary injunction to “prevent Steve Morriss from

transferring such property or selling it and dissipating the proceeds.” We affirm.

Tareco motioned for turnover under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies

Code Section 31.002, commonly referred to as the Texas Turnover Statute. This

statute is a procedural mechanism by which judgment creditors can reach assets

of a judgment debtor that are otherwise difficult to attach or levy on by ordinary

legal process. See Maiz v. Virani, 311 F.3d 334, 342 (5th Cir. 2002); Beaumont

Bank v. Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223, 224 (Tex. 1991).

We review a district court’s turnover judgment for abuse of discretion.

Bolloré S.A. v. Import Warehouse, Inc., 448 F.3d 317, 321 (5th Cir. 2006). A

court abuses its discretion when it acts “in an unreasonable or arbitrary manner

. . . without reference to any guiding rules and principles.” Id. (internal

quotation marks and citation omitted). Based on the available evidence, the

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Tareco’s motion for

turnover. Due in part to our conclusion that the district court properly denied

Tareco’s turnover motion, we also hold that the court did not abuse its discretion

in refusing to issue the injunction. See Piggly Wiggly Clarksville, Inc. v. Mrs.

Baird’s Bakeries, 177 F.3d 380, 382 (5th Cir. 1999) (“[T]he abuse of discretion

standard is utilized in our review of the district court's refusal to issue an

injunction.”).

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, 

Relator

Appellate case numbers: 01-18-00717-CV, 01-18-00718-CV, and 01-18-00719-CV

Trial court case numbers: 2013-18197, 2014-23449, and 2018-35870

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

On August 10, 2018, relator, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, 

filed three related petitionsfor writs of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent district 

judge to hold adversary hearings in the underlying suits affecting the parent-child 

relationships. Relator has included a record with each petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7.

With each petition, relator also filed an opposed “Motion for Stay Pending Petition 

for Writ of Mandamus,” seeking a temporary, emergency stay of the underlying 

proceedings, pending disposition of these petitions. Relator’s motions contain the required 

certificate of compliance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(a).

Accordingly, the Court grants the relator’s motions and ORDERS that the three 

underlying trial court proceedings are stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). These stays 

are effective until the petitions in this Court are finally decided or this Court otherwise 

orders the stays lifted. See TEX.R. APP. P. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration 

of the stay. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(c).

Finally, the Court requests a response to each of the petitions for writ of mandamus 

by any real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(1). The responses, if any, shall 

be filed within 20 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Laura Higley_____________________________________

 X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 14, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3129

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic fiber tow 
 containing 85 percent or more by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 
 percent or more but not over 3 percent of water, raw white (undyed), 
crimped, with an average decitex of 3.3 (plus or minus 10 percent) and 
  an aggregate filament measure in the tow bundle between 660,000 and 
        1,200,000 decitex, with a length greater than 2 meters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic fiber tow 
 containing 85 percent or more by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 
 percent or more but not over 3 percent of water, raw white (undyed), 
crimped, with an average decitex of 3.3 (plus or minus 10 percent) and 
  an aggregate filament measure in the tow bundle between 660,000 and 
        1,200,000 decitex, with a length greater than 2 meters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACRYLIC FIBER TOW CONTAINING 85 PERCENT OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF 
              ACRYLONITRILE UNITS AND 2 PERCENT OR MORE BUT NOT OVER 3 
              PERCENT OF WATER, RAW WHITE (UNDYED), CRIMPED, WITH AN 
              AVERAGE DECITEX OF 3.3 (PLUS OR MINUS 10 PERCENT) AND AN 
              AGGREGATE FILAMENT MEASURE IN THE TOW BUNDLE BETWEEN 
              660,000 AND 1,200,000 DECITEX, WITH A LENGTH GREATER THAN 
              2 METERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.14 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to acrylic fiber tow containing 
85 percent or more by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 percent or 
more but not over 3 percent of water, raw white (undyed), crimped, with 
an average decitex of 3.3 (plus or minus 10 percent) and an aggregate 
filament measure in the tow bundle between 660,000 and 1,200,000 
decitex, with a length greater than 2 meters) is amended by striking 
the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board
of Directors and Shareholders
NovaMed, Inc.
Chicago, Illinois

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-142530) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-87647, 333-67214, 333-129259, 333-155148 and 333-161204) of NovaMed, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2010 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of NovaMed, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

/s/ BDO
SEIDMAN, LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 16, 2010

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  Report of  Saratoga  Resources,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Dated:  July 8, 2005                          /s/ Thomas Cooke
                                              ______________________________
                                              Name: Thomas Cooke
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  July 8, 2005                          /s/ Thomas Cooke
                                              ______________________________
                                              Name: Thomas Cooke
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3168 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Hostanox P-EPQ. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Hostanox 

P-EPQ. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HOSTANOX P-EPQ. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.07 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 reaction products of phosphorus trichloride with 1,1′- 

7 biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol) is amended 

8 by striking the date in the effective period column and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3168 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS