alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mr. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX

Mail Code ORA-1

75 Hawthorne StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105

Re: 2012 Limited Maintenance Plan Annual Report for the Payson PM10 Maintenance Area

Dear Mi iunenfeld:

This letter provides EPA 2012 monitoring data for the Payson PM10 maintenance area to:

1. Demonstrate that the area continues to meet the PM10 national ambient air quality

standards (NAAQS), and

2. Demonstrate that the area continues to meet the design value criteria for a Limited

Maintenance Plan (LMP).

On February 7, 2002, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) submitted a

LMP for the Payson PM10 nonattainment area and a request for redesignation to attainment.Effective August 26, 2002 (67 FR 43013; June 26, 2002), EPA redesignated Payson to

attainment for the 24-hour and revoked annual PM10 NAAQS. On January 23, 2012, ADEQ

submitted an update to the LMP providing demonstration of continued maintenance of the

NAAQS in the area through the end of the maintenance period, 2022. As part of the LMP,

ADEQ committed to monitor the area’s air quality and submit annual reports to EPA regarding

the air quality status ofthe Payson area.

The accompanying analysis demonstrates that the Payson PM10 maintenance area continued to

meet the LMP design value criteria in 2012 (see Enclosure 1). The ambient air concentrations

also demonstrate that the Payson PM10 maintenance area continued to meet the 24-hour PM10

NAAQS in 2012. The analysis is based on the five years of monitoring data beginning in 2008

and ending in 2012. Payson continues to qualify for a LMP.

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Steve M. Calderon, Air

Quality SIP Section Manager, at (602) 771-2352.

Southern Regional Office

400 West Congress Street • Suite 433 • Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 628-6733

EC]VD

SEP 25 2013

Printed on recycled paper
Eric c]3Iiector

AjpØuality Division

Enclosure

cc: The Honorable Michael A. Pastor, Chair, Gila County Board of Supervisors

The Honorable Kenny Evans, Mayor, Town of Payson

Debra Gaibraith, Town Manager, Town of PaysonLaRon Garrett, P.E., Assistant Town Manager, Town of Payson

Colleen McKaughan, EPA Region IX

Wienke Tax, EPA Region IX


2010 60 42 39

2011 59 39 38

2012 60 44 40

Payson PM10 LMP Design Value

Incorporating all monitoring data for the 2008-20 12 period, the design value for the Payson Maintenance Area is 42 jig/rn 3,well below the LMP threshold of 98 jig/rn 3.

Data retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/airdatalad rep mon.html
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000754813
<NAME>                        ION NETWORKS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                           1,050,948
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    5,092,732
<ALLOWANCES>                       150,000
<INVENTORY>                      1,664,106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 8,612,401
<PP&E>                           2,024,562
<DEPRECIATION>                   1,129,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  17,554,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            4,659,757
<BONDS>                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         10,724
<OTHER-SE>                       10,282,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     17,554,645
<SALES>                           4,889,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  4,889,021
<CGS>                             1,931,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     4,048,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   66,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,157,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,157,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,157,032)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.13)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.12







Exhibit 10.12




First Amendment to Employment Agreement




This First Amendment to the employment agreement by and between THE WARNACO GROUP, INC., a
Delaware corporation (together with its successors and assigns, the “Company”), and ELIZABETH WOOD
(the “Executive”), dated as of December 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”), is made and entered into on the
date written below. All definitions not defined herein have the meaning ascribed to such terms in
the Agreement.



WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement to provide a pro-rata bonus for the
Executive upon certain terminations of employment without Cause or for Good Reason;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is mutually acknowledged, the Company
and the Executive agree as follows:



1. Section 6(a) of the Agreement is amended by deleting the “and” at the end of Section 6(a)(iii),
replacing the period at the end of Section 6(a)(iv) with “; and”, and adding the following new
clause (v) at the end of Section 6(a):




(v) a pro-rata annual bonus determined by multiplying the amount of the annual bonus the
Executive would have received had her employment continued through the end of the fiscal
year in which the Date of Termination occurs by a fraction, the numerator of which is the
number of days during such fiscal year that the Executive was employed by the Company and
the denominator of which is 365, payable when bonuses for such fiscal year are paid to other
Company executives (but in all events in the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which
the Date of Termination occurs and no later than 60 days after the end of fiscal year in
which the Date of Termination occurs).



2. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Agreement continues in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date written below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE WARNACO GROUP, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ Joseph R. Gromek	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name:	 	Joseph R. Gromek	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE EXECUTIVE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	/s/ Elizabeth Wood 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ELIZABETH WOOD	 	 






Date: October 31, 2011
### MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 10 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on October 29, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Desmond D. Lee, Appellant

V.

Breckenridge Group S an Antonio, II L.P., Appellee

No. 04

- 14

- 00394

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 388765

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’ s memorandum opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth Dist rict of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Catherine Stone, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on January 7, 2015

. KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853BILL OF COSTS



### TE XAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 14

- 00394

- CV

Desmond D. Lee

v.

Breckenridge Group San Antonio, II L.P.

(NO. 388765 IN COUNTY COU RT AT LAW NO. 10 OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY FILING $195.00 INDIGENT

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.**

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE , CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fourth District of Texas, this January 7, 2015

.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
Vincent E. VITTI, Appellant, v. WILLOUGHBY GOLF CLUB, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-0949

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Aptimus, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John A. Wade, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      John A. Wade


John
      A.
      Wade


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      15,
      2006
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**§
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SulphCo, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Rudolf W.
      Gunnerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Loren J. Kalmen, Chief
      Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Rudolf W. Gunnerman


Rudolf
      W.
      Gunnerman


Chief
      Executive Officer





November  14 ,
      2006





/s/
      Loren J. Kalmen


Loren
      J.
      Kalmen


Chief
      Financial Officer





November  14 ,
      2006





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. M A RV I N G . SCH A RFF, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 10286 D. C. No . 1 : 9 4 - c r - 0 0 0 5 9 - FM TG ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

for the D i stri ctof G uam F r a nc e s M . T y di ngc o- G a t e w ood, C hi e f Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 10, 2013 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M arvi n G . S char ff

appeal s f

rom the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entand chal l enges th e 1 0 0 - m o n th s e n t e n c e i m p o s e df o l l o wi n g h i s g u i l ty - p l e ac o n v i c t i o n f o rtwo c ount s of i m port a t i on of

he r oi n, i n vi ol a t i on of

21 U . S . C . § 952. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU N 13 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10286 2 S c h a r f f c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o c e du r a llye rr e db yf a ilin g to r e s p o n dto h is m itig a tin g a r g u m e n ts a n db yf a ilin g to e x p la in a d e q u a te lyw h yit d e n ie dh is r e q u e s t f

o rad o w n w a r dv a r ian c e . W e r e v ie w f o rp la in e rr o r , se e U

ni ted States v . V

ale nc i a- B arragan , 6 0 8 F .3 d1 1 0 3 , 1 1 0 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) , a n df in dn o n e . T h e r e c o r dr e f

le c ts th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt c o n s id e r e dS c h a r f f’s m itig a tin g a r g u m e n ts a nd a de qua t e l ye xpl a i ne d the s e nt e nc e i n l i ghtof the s e r i ous ne s s of

the of f e ns e a nd o th e r1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f a c to r s . AF F I RME D.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------

                             NOVAMED SUBSIDIARIES
                             --------------------

1.   NovaMed Management of Kansas City, Inc., a Missouri corporation

2.   Blue Ridge NovaMed, Inc., a Missouri corporation

3.   NovaMed Eye Surgery Center (Plaza) L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability
     company

4.   NovaMed Eye Surgery Center of Overland Park, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
     liability company

5.   NovaMed Eyecare Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

6.   NovaMed Eye Surgery Center of Maryville, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
     liability company

7.   NovaMed Eye Surgery Center of North County, LLC, a Delaware limited
     liability company

8.   NovaMed Eye Surgery Center of New Albany, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
     liability company

9.   NovaMed of Louisville, Inc., a Kentucky corporation

10.  NovaMed of Richmond, Inc., a Virginia corporation

11.  Midwest Uncuts, Inc., an Iowa corporation

12.  NMSL, Inc., a Missouri corporation

13.  NovaMed of St. Louis, Inc., a Missouri corporation

14.  NovaMed Eyecare Research, Inc., a Delaware corporation

15.  NovaMed Eye Surgery and Laser Center of St. Joseph, Inc., a Missouri
     corporation

16.  NMGK, Inc., an Illinois corporation
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



The non-employee directors of Quest Resource Corporation receive the following compensation:





	 	•	 	annual director fee of $50,000 per year;
	 
	 	•	 	annual fee of $7,500 per year for the Audit Committee chairperson;
	 
	 	•	 	annual fee of $5,000 per year for any other committee chairperson; and
	 
	 	•	 	a grant of 10,000 shares of common stock of Quest Resource Corporation immediately
following each annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that if a director has
been awarded a prior grant of restricted shares that vests over time, the number of
restricted shares vesting in that calendar year will be subtracted from the 10,000 shares
granted after the annual meeting of stockholders.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2854 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2854

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triacetonamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

   Mr. Pryor introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triacetonamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIACETONAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to triacetonamine) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2911 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2911

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pistons for marine 
                          propulsion engines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pistons for marine 
                          propulsion engines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PISTONS FOR MARINE PROPULSION ENGINES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Pistons for marine  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        propulsion                                                         31/2015.......
                        engines, each
                        weighing 12 kg or
                        more (provided
                        for in subheading
                        8409.99.92)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID PATTERSON,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 10-15898

D.C. No. 5:08-cv-02492-RMW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011**

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner David Patterson appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Patterson contends that the Board’s 2006 decision to deny him parole was

not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. 

FILED

DEC 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-15898

The only federal right at issue in the parole context is procedural, and the only

proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not whether the state court

decided the case correctly. Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S. Ct. 859, 863 (2011);

Roberts v. Hartley, 640 F.3d 1042, 1045-47 (9th Cir. 2011) (applying Cooke). 

Because Patterson raises no procedural challenges, we affirm. 

AFFIRMED.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before KING , M C CONNELL , and FOIL , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Stephen R. KERLAGON Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201 8003 58
Decided: 20 November 2019

. Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

. Military Judge : Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Libretto , USMC

. Sentence adjudged 14 August 2018 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Recruit Depot Paris Island, South Carolina , consisting of a military judg e sitting alone

. Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction to E

- 1 , confinement for seven months, and a bad

- conduct discharge. For Appellant: Captain Kimberly D. Hinson , JAGC, USN R

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)
.

_________________________ PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in lawUnited States v. Kerlagon , No. 201 8003 58

2 and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

ROD GER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court