alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Michael J. Hagan, the Chief Executive Officer of NutriSystem, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 2, 2004 |  | /S/ MICHAEL J. HAGAN                             
|                       |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2004358EN.01003501.xml

| 3.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 358/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 358/35

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 134 of 30 April 2004
  )

On page 104, Annex XXVI, Correlation table:

for:

| ‘Article 1(9), (d) | Article 1(16), | Adapted |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Article 1(10) | | New |
| Article 1(11) | | New |
| Article 1(12) | | New’ |

‘Article 1(9), (d)

Article 1(16),

Adapted

Article 1(10)

New

Article 1(11)

New

Article 1(12)

New’

read:

| ‘Article 1(10) | Article 1(16) | Adapted |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Article 1(11) | | New |
| Article 1(12) | | New |
| Article 1(13) | | New’ |

‘Article 1(10)

Article 1(16)

Adapted

Article 1(11)

New

Article 1(12)

New

Article 1(13)

New’

---
Independent Auditors' Consent

 

 

The Board of Directors

Rome Bancorp, Inc.:

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-36282 on Form S-8 of Rome Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 22, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Rome Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, which report has been incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Rome Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

 

s/s KPMG LLP

 

Syracuse, New York

March 26, 2003
Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code s. 1350

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 40-F of Manulife Financial Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2012                                       
|                                                           
|/s/ Michael W. Bell                                        
|Michael W. Bell                                            
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 7400** 

FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR. ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE ; WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCE; DR. TOM LINGUISE; DR. ISAIAS TESSEMA, (MD); SYRESH MENON; DR. MELAKU AYALEW; DR. DAVID MATHIS; DR. DEREJE TESFAYE; DR. AVA JOUBERT; CHRISTY WHITEHAIR ,
Defendant s

- Appellee s
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. William D. Quarles, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1 :10

- cv

- 01481

- WDQ )

Submitted : March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melto n Andrews, Mary Beth Ewen, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Erin O. Millar, Valerie L. Tetro, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Fra nkie L. McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court ’ s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny McCoy’s motion for appointment of counsel

and affirm for the re asons stated by the district court.

McCoy v. Corr. Med. Serv. , No. 1:10

- cv

- 01481

- WDQ (D. Md. Sept.

20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument w ould not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                   HMG WORLDWIDE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      INCOME              SHARES             PER SHARE
                                    (NUMERATOR)        (DENOMINATOR)          AMOUNT
                                    -----------        -------------          ------
<S>                                   <C>                 <C>                <C>
Basic earnings (loss) per share:      ($6,468)            15,685             ($  0.41)
                                                                             ========

Effect of dilutive securities:
 Stock options and warrants              --                 --
                                      -------             ------

Diluted earnings (loss) per share     ($6,468)            15,685             ($  0.41)
                                      =======             ======             ========
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
                                          --------------------------------------
                                    INCOME                  SHARES                PER SHARE
                                  (NUMERATOR)            (DENOMINATOR)              AMOUNT
                                  -----------            -------------              ------
<S>                                 <C>                    <C>                    <C>
Basic earnings per share:            $  847                 12,737                 $   0.06
                                                                                   ========

Effect of dilutive securities:
 Stock options and warrants            --                    3,209
                                     ------                 ------

Diluted earnings per share:          $  847                 15,946                 $   0.05
                                     ======                 ======                 ========
</TABLE>
ENCLOSURE 1

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION

PROVISIONS AFFECTED

REVISION K08

CONCERNING

NOx SIP CALL BUDGET

(9VAC5 CHAPTER 140)

Adoption Date: October 23, 2008

Effective Date: December 31, 2008

The following table lists the specific provisions of the attached regulations that will be 

used to implement the State Implementation Plan (SIP). A copy of the actual regulation 

submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the Virginia SIP is included 

in Enclosure 2.

PART I NOX Budget Trading Program

Article 10 State Trading Program Budget and Compliance Pool

9 VAC 5-140-900 State trading program budget (modified)

9 VAC 5-140-910 Compliance supplement pool budget

9 VAC 5-140-920 Total electric generating unit allocations (modified)

9 VAC 5-140-930 Total non-electric generating unit allocations (modified)

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REG01

SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2010\K08-SIP-1.DOC
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3395 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to extend certain supplemental 

agricultural disaster assistance programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2012 

Mr. MERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to extend certain 

supplemental agricultural disaster assistance programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfire and Drought 

5 Relief for Ranchers and Farmers Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL AGRICULTURAL DISASTER ASSIST7 ANCE PROGRAMS. 

8 Section 531 of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 

9 U.S.C. 1531) is amended— 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3395 IS

1 (1) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘The Sec2 retary shall use such sums as are necessary from the 

3 Trust Fund’’ and inserting ‘‘Of the funds of the 

4 Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall 

5 use such sums as are necessary for fiscal year 

6 2012’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (d)(2), by striking ‘‘The Sec8 retary shall use such sums as are necessary from the 

9 Trust Fund’’ and inserting ‘‘Of the funds of the 

10 Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall 

11 use such sums as are necessary for fiscal year 

12 2012’’; 

13 (3) in subsection (e)(1)— 

14 (A) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and in15 serting ‘‘Of the funds of the Commodity Credit 

16 Corporation, the Secretary’’; and 

17 (B) by striking ‘‘per year from the Trust 

18 Fund’’ and inserting ‘‘for fiscal year 2012’’; 

19 (4) in subsection (f)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘the 

20 Secretary shall use such sums as are necessary from 

21 the Trust Fund’’ and inserting ‘‘of the funds of the 

22 Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall 

23 use such sums as are necessary for fiscal year 

24 2012’’; and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3395 IS

1 (5) in subsection (i), by striking ‘‘This section’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘Except as otherwise provided in this 

3 section, this section’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3251

To amend title 46, United States Code, with respect to Mille Lacs Lake, 
                   Minnesota, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2012

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Franken) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 46, United States Code, with respect to Mille Lacs Lake, 
                   Minnesota, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mille Lacs Lake Freedom To Fish Act 
of 2012''.

SEC. 2. MILLE LACS LAKE.

    Section 4101(1) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting before the semicolon the following: ``(except that, for 
purposes of this section, the navigable waters of the United States 
shall be treated as not including Mille Lacs Lake, Minnesota)''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3319 

To amend the National Trails System Act to revise the route of the North 

Country National Scenic Trail in northeastern Minnesota to include 

existing hiking trails along the north shore of Lake Superior, in the 

Superior National Forest, and in the Chippewa National Forest, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2012 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to revise the 

route of the North Country National Scenic Trail in 

northeastern Minnesota to include existing hiking trails 

along the north shore of Lake Superior, in the Superior 

National Forest, and in the Chippewa National Forest, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL 

4 ROUTE REVISION. 

5 The first sentence of section 5(a)(8) of the National 

6 Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3319 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘thirty-two hundred miles’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘4,600 miles’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘ ‘North Country Trail Report’, 

4 dated June 1975’’ and inserting ‘‘ ‘North Country 

5 National Scenic Trail, Authorized Route’, dated 

6 February 16, 2005, and numbered 649/80,002’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATIONS



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Forbes Medi-Tech Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Goold, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |               |                        
| | ------------- | -----------------------
| | April 2, 2007 | /s/ David Goold        
| |               | David Goold            
| |               | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Forbes Medi-Tech Inc. and will be retained by Forbes Medi-Tech Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-4369

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBIN HUSSEY GARNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:11-cr-00308-TDS-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henderson Hill, Executive Director, Thomas N. Cochran, FEDERAL 

DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Asheville, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, Acting United States 

Attorney, Robert M. Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robin Hussey Garner pled guilty, pursuant to a written 

plea agreement, to three counts of bank fraud and one count of 

making false entries, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1005, 1344(2) (2006). She 

was sentenced to forty-three months of imprisonment and ordered 

to pay restitution in the amount of $267,344. Garner timely 

appealed.

Garner’s only claim on appeal is that the district 

court committed procedural error at sentencing by failing to 

address her arguments, both before and during the sentencing 

hearing, for a below-guidelines sentence based on her health 

issues. We affirm.

We review Garner’s sentence for reasonableness under a 

deferential abuse-of-discretion standard. Gall v. United 

States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007). A sentence is procedurally 

reasonable if, among other things, the court sufficiently 

explains its reasons for imposing it. Id. at 49-51. While 

every sentence requires an adequate explanation, when the 

district court imposes a sentence within the Guidelines range, 

“the explanation need not be elaborate or lengthy.” United 

States v. Hernandez, 603 F.3d 267, 271 (4th Cir. 2010). 

Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the 

district court provided an adequate explanation of Garner’s 

sentence and therefore did not commit procedural error by 
3

imposing its chosen sentence. The court considered the 

particularized facts of Garner’s case and determined that the 

significant amount of money involved, Garner’s abuse of a 

position of trust, and the duration of the fraudulent activity 

warranted the sentence imposed. Furthermore, the court adopted 

the presentence report which considered Garner’s physical and 

mental condition, and specifically stated that it had taken into 

account all the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors in 

determining a sentence. Because Garner’s sentence was within 

the advisory Guidelines range, the district court’s explanation 

was more than sufficient. See Hernandez, 603 F.3d at 271. 

Accordingly, we affirm Garner’s sentence. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Yaron Adler


 [address]







Date: October 24, 2011







Re: Appointment as Director of the Board of Directors of the Company







Dear Yaron,







We are delighted to invite you to serve as a member of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Whitesmoke, Inc. (the "Company"). The appointment will become effective upon consummation of the Company’s Initial Public Offering on the Nasdaq Capital Market by no later than March 31, 2012 (“IPO”) and is subject to (i) approval by the Company’s current Board; and (ii) your agreement to the terms contained herein. Subject to the foregoing, in consideration for your services as director, you will be entitled to receive:








	
  

	
(a)

	
Options to purchase 18,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 each (the “Options”), to vest in equal portions annually over three years following the date of consummation of the IPO (the “IPO Date”), subject to your continued service as a member of the Board. The Options shall be exercisable  at a price equal to the price per share at which the Company’s shares of common stock, par value $0.001 (the “Company Shares”) are offered to the public, immediately upon consummation of the Company’s IPO (the “IPO Price”).  The Options shall be granted under Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance and subject to the Company's 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. Principal Market shall mean the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Nasdaq Global Market, the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the OTC Bulletin Board or Pink Sheets, whichever is at the time the principal trading exchange or market for the Company Shares.













	
  

	
(b)

	
A fixed annual fee of US $12,000, to be payable in quarterly installments in arrears, within thirty (30) days of receipt by the Company of an invoice for the previous quarter. The fixed fee shall be pro rated for any part of a year in which you serve; and













	
  

	
(c)

	
A fixed fee of US $500 per meeting attended in person. This fee is to be payable in arrears, within thirty (30) days of receipt by the Company of an invoice. For the avoidance of doubt, you shall not receive any separate form of consideration for meetings that you attend remotely.













	
  

	
(d)

	
We are also pleased to confirm our agreement to pay you $45,000 for certain advisory services you provided to the Company during 2010 (the "Advisory Fee"). You will be entitled to receive the Advisory Fee in nine (9) monthly installments of US $5,000, payable commencing the first business day of the calendar month first following the IPO Date.












This Agreement replaces and supersedes all previous agreements between you and the Company, with the exception of the option agreement entered into between you and the Company dated March 11, 2007, which shall remain in full force and effect.


 




  





  











  











The above terms are subject to your approval as well as approval by the Board.







Kindest regards,







Whitesmoke, Inc.








	
By:

	
/s/ Hilla Ovil Brenner

	 
	  	 
	
Title:

	
CEO

	 
	  	 
	
I consent to the terms set forth herein.

	 
	  	 
	
/s/ Yaron Adler

	 
	
Yaron Adler

	 
	
[Director]
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report
of HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Lalit Dhadphale, President and Chief Executive Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




1.
            The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and




2.
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




August
      21, 2009
            /s/ Lalit DhadphaleLalit
      DhadphalePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written
statement required by section 906 has been provided toHealthWarehouse.com, Inc. and will be retained byHealthWarehouse.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.