37646 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

an environmental standard intended to 

mitigate health or safety risks. 

Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 

2001)), because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 

104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 

directs EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. Voluntary consensus 

standards are technical standards (e.g., 

materials specifications, test methods, 

sampling procedures, and business 

practices) that are developed or adopted 

by voluntary consensus standards 

bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide 

Congress, through OMB, explanations 

when the agency decides not to use 

available and applicable voluntary 

consensus standards. This action does 

not involve technical standards. 

Therefore, EPA is not considering the 

use of any voluntary consensus 

standards. 

Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions 

To Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations 

Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 

7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provisions directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

EPA lacks the discretionary authority 

to address environmental justice in this 

proposed rulemaking. This rule 

implements the provisions in section 

31001(o) of the Debt Collection 

Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA) and 

only addresses administrative wage 

garnishment for delinquent non-tax 

debt. 

Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A Major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule 

will be effective September 2, 2014. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 13 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Claims, Debt collection, Government 

employees, Garnishment of wages, 

Hearing and appeal procedures, 

Salaries, Wages. 

Dated: June 23, 2014. 

Jeanne Conklin, 

Acting Director Office of Financial 

Management. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Environmental Protection 

Agency amends 40 CFR part 13 as 

follows: 

PART 13—CLAIMS COLLECTION 

STANDARDS 

■ 1. The authority citation to part 13 is 

revised to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a, 5512, and 5514; 

31 U.S.C. 3701; 31 U.S.C. 3711 et seq. and 

3720A; 31 U.S.C. 3720D; 31 CFR 285.11; 31 

CFR parts 900–904. 

■ 2. Part 13 is amended by adding 

Subpart I to read as follows: 

Subpart I—Administrative Wage 

Garnishment 

§ 13.41 Administrative wage garnishment. 

(a) Environmental Protection Agency 

is authorized to collect debts from an 

individual debtor’s wages by means of 

administrative wage garnishment in 

accordance with the requirements of 31 

U.S.C. 3720D and 31 CFR 285.11. This 

part adopts the provisions of 31 CFR 

285.11 concerning administrative wage 

garnishment, including the hearing 

procedures described in 31 CFR 

285.11(f). Environmental Protection 

Agency may use administrative wage 

garnishment to collect a delinquent 

Environmental Protection Agency debt 

unless the debtor is making timely 

payments under an agreement to pay the 

debt in installments (see § 13.18 of this 

part). If the Environmental Protection 

Agency intends to use administrative 

wage garnishment, at least thirty (30) 

days prior to initiating an administrative 

wage garnishment, the Environmental 

Protection Agency will send notice to 

the debtor as set forth in 31 CFR 

285.11(e). Alternatively, for 

Environmental Protection Agency debts 

referred to the Department of the 

Treasury (Treasury) for cross-servicing 

pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711(g)(1), the 

Environmental Protection Agency may 

authorize Treasury to send the required 

notice informing the debtor that 

administrative wage garnishment will 

be initiated and how the debtor may 

request a hearing as described in 31 CFR 

285.11(f). If a debtor makes a timely 

request for a hearing, administrative 

wage garnishment will not begin until a 

hearing is held and a decision is sent to 

the debtor. See 31 CFR 285.11(f)(4). 

Even if a debtor’s hearing request is not 

timely, the Environmental Protection 

Agency may suspend collection by 

administrative wage garnishment in 

accordance with the provisions of 31 

CFR 285.11(f)(5). All travel expenses 

incurred by the debtor in connection 

with an in-person hearing will be borne 

by the debtor. 

(b) This section does not apply to 

Federal employee salary offset, the 

process by which the Environmental 

Protection Agency collects debts from 

the salaries of Federal employees (see 

§ 13.21 of this part). 

[FR Doc. 2014–15578 Filed 7–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0567; FRL–9912–85– 

Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; 

Indiana PM2.5 NSR 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve portions of submissions from 

Indiana addressing EPA’s requirements 

for its new source review (NSR) and 

prevention of significant deterioration 

(PSD) program with respect to 

particulate matter smaller than 2.5 

micrometers (PM2.5) and ozone 

precursors. This rulemaking will 

finalize portions of two proposed 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 37647 

1 75 FR 64863 (October 20, 2010). 

2 70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005). 

3 73 FR 28321 (May 16, 2008). 

rulemaking actions, one published in 

the Federal Register on August 19, 2013 

and another published on November 1, 

2013. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

August 1, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0567. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Michael 

Langman, Environmental Scientist, at 

(312) 886–6867 before visiting the 

Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Langman, Environmental 

Scientist, Air Permits Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6867, 

langman.michael@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for this final 

approval? 

II. What is EPA approving with this final 

action? 

III. Why is EPA approving changes to 

Indiana’s nonattainment new source 

review program? 

IV. Why is EPA taking no action on portions 

of indiana’s request? 

V. What action is EPA taking? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews. 

I. What is the background for this final 

approval? 

On July 12, 2012, the Indiana 

Department of Environmental 

Management (IDEM) submitted 

revisions to Indiana’s State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) intended to 

address ozone and PM2.5 NSR and PSD 

requirements. IDEM also submitted a 

supplemental revision to its SIP on 

December 12, 2012, addressing 

additional PM2.5 NSR and PSD 

requirements. Indiana’s SIP is contained 

within title 326 of the Indiana 

Administrative Code (IAC). 

On August 19, 2013, EPA proposed to 

approve some portions of the 

submissions as revisions to Indiana’s 

SIP (see 78 FR 50360). The public 

comment period for this proposed 

approval ended on September 18, 2013. 

EPA received comments on the August 

19, 2013, proposed rulemaking. 

On November 1, 2013, EPA proposed 

to approve additional portions of the 

submissions as revisions to Indiana’s 

SIP (see 78 FR 65590). The public 

comment period for the proposed 

approval ended on December 2, 2013. 

No comments were received for the 

November 1, 2013, proposed 

rulemaking. 

In today’s rulemaking, EPA finalizes 

portions of its August 19, 2013, and 

November 1, 2013, proposed approval of 

Indiana’s July 12, 2012, and December 

12, 2012, submissions from IDEM. 

These were intended to address 

requirements related to EPA’s 2010 final 

rule entitled ‘‘Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate 

Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers 

(PM2.5)—Increments, Significant Impact 

Levels (SILs), and Significant 

Monitoring Concentration (SMC)’’ (the 

2010 NSR Rule) 1 with respect to the 

major source baseline date, trigger date, 

definition of baseline area, and the class 

I variance. EPA will also finalize its 

approval of portions of IDEM’s 

submission addressing nitrogen oxide 

(NOX) ozone precursor requirements 

obligated by EPA’s 2005 final rule 

entitled ‘‘Final Rule to Implement the 8- 

hour Ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard—Phase 2’’.2

EPA is also finalizing its approval of 

some portions of Indiana’s submission 

as it relates to nonattainment NSR. In 

particular, EPA is approving the 

revisions to Indiana’s SIP intended to 

address the requirements obligated by 

EPA’s 2008 final rule entitled 

‘‘Implementation of New Source Review 

(NSR) Program for Particulate Matter 

Less than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5)’’ (the 

2008 NSR Rule) 3 with respect to 

nonattainment NSR program definitions 

of ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’ and 

‘‘significant’’. These definitions were 

submitted in accordance with title I, 

part D, subpart 1 of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) as opposed to title I, part D, 

subpart 4 of the CAA. 

EPA will be taking no action on the 

revisions requesting changes to 

permitting exemptions and Indiana’s 

title V program. EPA will also be taking 

no action on the revisions incorporating 

PM2.5 PSD increments due to an adverse 

comment EPA received on the August 

19, 2013, proposed rulemaking. 

The following sections will describe 

in more detail the action EPA is taking 

on each of Indiana’s requests. 

II. What is EPA approving with this 

final action? 

For the reasons discussed in the 

November 1, 2013, proposed rulemaking 

(see 78 FR 65590), EPA is finalizing its 

approval for the following revisions to 

Indiana’s SIP: 

(i) The corrected SIP citation for 

ozone ambient air quality data at 326 

IAC 2–2–4(b)(2)(A)(vi); 

(ii) The revised requirements allowing 

the submission of ozone post-approval 

monitoring data for both volatile organic 

compounds (VOC) and NOX at 326 IAC 

2–2–4(c)(4); 

(iii) The addition of the PM2.5 class I 

variance at 326 IAC 2–2–14(e); and 

(iv) The revised submission 

requirements to include PM2.5

requirements as part of the petition for 

alternate opacity limits at 326 IAC 5–1– 

5(b)(1)(E). 

EPA is also finalizing approval of 

portions of submissions from IDEM 

intended to address requirements 

related to the 2010 NSR Rule. On 

August 19, 2013, EPA published a 

rulemaking proposing approval of 326 

IAC 2–2–1(f)(1), 326 IAC 2–2–1(ee)(3), 

and 326 IAC 2–2–1(gg)(1)(C) (see 78 FR 

50360). This action was independent of 

the November 1, 2013, proposed 

rulemaking (see 78 FR 65590), where 

EPA proposed approval of the identical 

provisions. Therefore, for the reasons 

discussed in both the August 19, 2013, 

and November 1, 2013, proposed 

rulemakings, EPA is finalizing its 

approval for the following revisions to 

Indiana’s SIP: 

(i) The revision to the definition of 

‘‘baseline area’’ at 326 IAC 2–2–1(f)(1); 

(ii) The revision to the definition of 

‘‘major source baseline date’’ at 326 IAC 

2–2–1(ee)(3); and 

(iii) The addition of the PM2.5 trigger 

date to the definition of ‘‘minor source 

baseline date’’ at 326 IAC 2–2– 

1(gg)(1)(C). 

To clarify, today’s final approval of 

326 IAC 2–2–1(f)(1), 326 IAC 2–2– 

1(ee)(3), and 326 IAC 2–2–1(gg)(1)(C) 

serves as a final action for both the 

August 19, 2013, and November 1, 2013, 

proposed rulemakings. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
37648 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

4 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013). 

III. Why is EPA approving changes to 

Indiana’s nonattainment new source 

review program? 

On January 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit, in Natural Resources Defense 

Council v. EPA 4 issued a decision that 

remanded the EPA’s 2007 and 2008 

rules implementing the 1997 PM2.5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). Relevant here, the 2008 NSR 

Rule promulgated NSR requirements for 

implementation of PM2.5 in both 

nonattainment areas and attainment/

unclassifiable areas. The Court found 

that EPA erred in implementing the 

PM2.5 NAAQS in these rules solely 

pursuant to the general implementation 

provisions of subpart 1 of part D of title 

I of the CAA, rather than pursuant to the 

additional implementation provisions 

specific to particulate matter 

nonattainment areas in subpart 4. The 

Court ordered the EPA to ‘‘repromulgate 

these rules pursuant to Subpart 4 

consistent with this opinion.’’ Id. at 437. 

On April 25, 2014, the Administrator 

signed a final rulemaking that begins to 

address the remand (see http://

www.epa.gov/airquality/

particlepollution/actions.html). Upon 

its effective date, the final rule classifies 

all existing PM2.5 nonattainment areas as 

‘‘Moderate’’ nonattainment areas and 

sets a deadline of December 31, 2014, 

for states to submit any SIP 

submissions, including nonattainment 

NSR SIPs, that may be necessary to 

satisfy the requirements of subpart 4, 

part D, title I of the CAA with respect 

to PM2.5 nonattainment areas. 

In a separate rulemaking process that 

will follow the April 2014 rule, EPA is 

evaluating the requirements of subpart 4 

as they pertain to nonattainment NSR 

for PM2.5 emissions. In particular, 

subpart 4 includes section 189(e) of the 

CAA, which requires the control of 

major stationary sources of PM10

precursors ‘‘except where the 

Administrator determines that such 

sources do not contribute significantly 

to PM10 levels which exceed the 

standard in the area.’’ Under the court’s 

decision in NRDC, section 189(e) of the 

CAA also applies to PM2.5. 

As discussed in the proposed 

rulemaking for this action, IDEM’s SIP 

submission included revisions to two 

definitions in Indiana’s nonattainment 

NSR program. The revised definition of 

‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’ at 326 IAC 

2–3–1(mm)(3) identifies precursors to 

both ozone and PM2.5 in nonattainment 

areas. With respect to PM2.5, the revised 

definition of ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’ 

at 326 IAC 2–3–1(mm)(3) identifies 

sulfur dioxide (SO2) and NOX as 

regulated PM2.5 precursors while VOCs 

and ammonia are not regulated PM2.5

precursors in PM2.5 nonattainment areas 

in the state. The revised definition of 

‘‘significant’’ at 326 IAC 2–3–1(pp) adds 

significant emission rates for direct 

PM2.5 and for SO2 and NOX as PM2.5

precursors. These revisions, although 

consistent with the 2008 NSR Rule as 

developed consistent with subpart 1 of 

the CAA, may not contain the elements 

necessary to satisfy the CAA 

requirements when evaluated under the 

subpart 4 statutory requirements. In 

particular, Indiana’s submission does 

not include regulation of VOCs and 

ammonia as PM2.5 precursors, nor does 

it include a demonstration consistent 

with section 189(e) showing that major 

sources of those precursor pollutants 

would not contribute significantly to 

PM2.5 levels exceeding the standard in 

the area. For these reasons, EPA cannot 

conclude at this time that this part of 

Indiana’s nonattainment NSR 

submission satisfies all of the 

requirements of subpart 4 as they 

pertain to PM2.5 nonattainment NSR 

permitting. 

Although the revisions to Indiana’s 

nonattainment NSR rule may not 

contain all of the necessary elements to 

satisfy the CAA requirements when 

evaluated under the subpart 4 

provisions, the revisions themselves 

represent a strengthening of the 

currently-approved Indiana SIP which 

does not address PM2.5 at all. As a result 

of the April 25, 2014, final rule, IDEM 

will have until December 31, 2014, to 

make any additional submission 

necessary to address the requirements of 

subpart 4, including addressing the 

PM2.5 precursors of VOC and ammonia. 

For these reasons, EPA is approving the 

nonattainment NSR revisions at 326 IAC 

2–3–1(mm)(3) and 326 IAC 2–3–1(pp) 

without listing as a deficiency at this 

time the absence of either the regulation 

or evaluation of VOCs and ammonia as 

PM2.5 precursors. 

IV. Why is EPA taking no action on 

portions of Indiana’s request? 

EPA is taking no action with respect 

to the PSD increment revision at 326 

IAC 2–2–6(b). In EPA’s August 19, 2013 

rulemaking, we proposed to approve 

revisions to Indiana’s PSD increment at 

326 IAC 2–2–6(b). During the comment 

period for the August 19, 2013, 

proposed rulemaking, EPA received an 

adverse comment regarding the PSD 

increment revision at 326 IAC 2–2–6(b). 

In the November 1, 2013, proposed 

rulemaking, EPA proposed to approve 

the same revisions to Indiana’s PSD 

increment at 326 IAC 2–2–6(b). EPA did 

not receive any adverse comments 

during the comment period for that 

proposed rulemaking. However, given 

the earlier adverse comment, EPA is not 

taking final action with respect to 326 

IAC 2–2–6(b) in this action. Instead, 

EPA will address Indiana’s satisfaction 

of the PSD increment requirements and 

address the adverse comment in a 

separate action. 

EPA is also taking no action on the 

following revisions to Indiana’s SIP: 

(i) 326 IAC 2–1.1–3(d)(2)(A); 

(ii) 326 IAC 2–1.1–3(e)(1)(A); and 

(iii) 326 IAC 2–1.1–3(h)(2)(B)(xi). 

As discussed in the November 1, 

2013, proposal, these revisions to 

permitting exemptions were requested 

for state regulations that EPA has not 

previously approved into Indiana’s SIP. 

If Indiana requests in the future that 

EPA take action on adding these 

revisions to Indiana’s SIP as part of a 

separate SIP submission, then EPA will 

do so at that time. 

EPA is taking no action on the 

following revisions to Indiana’s title V 

program: 

(i) 326 IAC 2–7–1(21)(E)(vi); and 

(ii) 326 IAC 2–7–1(42)(C)(ii)(FF). 

As discussed in the November 1, 

2013, proposal, EPA will take action on 

the revisions to Indiana’s title V 

program as part of a title V program 

submission. 

V. What action is EPA taking? 

For the reasons discussed previously 

in the proposed rulemaking and in 

today’s final rulemaking, EPA is 

approving into the Indiana SIP the 

following revised rules addressing PM2.5

and ozone requirements: 326 IAC 2–2– 

1(f)(1), (ee)(3), and (gg)(1)(C); 326 IAC 2– 

2–4(b)(2)(A)(vi) and (c)(4); 326 IAC 2–2– 

14(e); and 326 IAC 5–1–5(b)(1)(E). 

EPA is also approving into the 

Indiana SIP the following revised rules 

to Indiana’s nonattainment NSR 

program: 326 IAC 2–3–1(mm)(3) and 

(pp). 

For the reasons identified in the 

November 1, 2013, proposed rulemaking 

and further explained in today’s final 

rulemaking, EPA is taking no action 

with respect to the following revised 

rules to PM2.5 PSD increment, 

permitting exemptions, and Indiana’s 

title V program: 326 IAC 2–1.1– 

3(d)(2)(A), (e)(1)(A), and (h)(2)(B)(xi); 

326 IAC 2–2–6(b); and 326 IAC 2–7– 

1(21)(E)(vi) and (42)(C)(ii)(FF). 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 37649 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by September 2, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: June 17, 2014. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. In § 52.770 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by: 

■ a. Revising the entries in ‘‘Article 2. 

Permit Review Rules’’ for ‘‘Rule 2. 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

Requirements’’; 

■ b. Revising the entry in ‘‘Article 2. 

Permit Review Rules’’, ‘‘Rule 3. 

Emission Offset’’ for 2–3–1 

‘‘Definitions’’; and 

■ c. Revising the entries for ‘‘Article 5. 

Opacity Regulations’’. 

The revised text reads as follows: 

§ 52.770 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA–APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS

Indiana citation Subject Indiana 

effective date EPA approval date Notes 

*******

Article 2. Permit Review Rules 

*******

Rule 2. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements 

2–2–1 .............. Definitions ...................................... 7/11/2012 10/29/2012, 77 FR 65478 .............. (dd)(1), (ff)(7), (ss)(1), (ww)(1)(F), 

and (ww)(1)(G) only. 

7/11/2012 7/2/2014, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].(f)(1), (ee)(3), and (gg)(1)(C) only. 

2–2–2 .............. Applicability .................................... 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242.

2–2–3 .............. Control technology review; requirements.9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.

2–2–4 .............. Air quality analysis; requirements .. 7/11/2012 10/29/2012, 77 FR 65478 .............. (b)(2)(vi) only. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
37650 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA–APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS—Continued 

Indiana citation Subject Indiana 

effective date EPA approval date Notes 

7/11/2012 7/2/2014, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].(c)(4) only. 

2–2–5 .............. Air quality impact; requirements .... 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242.

2–2–6 .............. Increment consumption; requirements.9/10/2004 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395.

2–2–8 .............. Source obligation ........................... 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242.

2–2–10 ............ Source information ......................... 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242.

2–2–11 ............ Stack height provisions .................. 4/22/2001 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.

2–2–12 ............ Permit rescission ........................... 4/8/2004 5/20/2004, 69 FR 29071.

2–2–13 ............ Area designation and redesignation.4/22/2001 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.

2–2–14 ............ Sources impacting federal Class I 

areas: additional requirements.

7/11/2012 7/2/2014, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].

2–2–15 ............ Public participation ......................... 4/22/2001 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.

2–2–16 ............ Ambient air ceilings ....................... 4/22/2001 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197.

Rule 3. Emission Offset 

2–3–1 .............. Definitions ...................................... 10/31/2010 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242.

......................... 7/11/2012 7/2/2014, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].

*******

Article 5. Opacity Regulations 

Rule 1. Opacity Limitations 

5–1–1 .............. Applicability .................................... 11/8/1998 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589.

5–1–2 .............. Opacity limitations .......................... 11/8/1998 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589.

5–1–3 .............. Temporary alternative opacity limitations.11/8/1998 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589.

5–1–4 .............. Compliance determination ............. 6/11/1993 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 ................ Sec. 4(a). 

11/8/1998 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589 ................ Sec. 4(b). 

5–1–5 .............. Violations ....................................... 6/11/1993 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 ................ Sec. 5(a), 5(c). 

11/8/1998 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589 ................ Sec. 5(b). 

7/11/2012 7/2/2014, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].Sec. 5(b)(1)(E) only. 

5–1–7 .............. State implementation plan revisions.6/11/1993 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412.

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–15271 Filed 7–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 64 

[Docket ID FEMA–2014–0002; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–8339] 

Suspension of Community Eligibility 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule identifies 

communities where the sale of flood 

insurance has been authorized under 

the National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP) that are scheduled for 

suspension on the effective dates listed 

within this rule because of 

noncompliance with the floodplain 

management requirements of the 

program. If the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) receives 

documentation that the community has 

adopted the required floodplain 

management measures prior to the 

effective suspension date given in this 

rule, the suspension will not occur and 

a notice of this will be provided by 

publication in the Federal Register on a 

subsequent date. Also, information 

identifying the current participation 

status of a community can be obtained 

from FEMA’s Community Status Book 

(CSB). The CSB is available at http://

www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm. 

DATES: Effective Dates: The effective 

date of each community’s scheduled 

suspension is the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) 

listed in the third column of the 

following tables. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you want to determine whether a 

particular community was suspended 

on the suspension date or for further 

information, contact David Stearrett, 

Federal Insurance and Mitigation 

Administration, Federal Emergency 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES