UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 10-Q
  x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
 
 OR
 
  ̈ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the transition period from ___________ to __________
 
 Commission File No.  000-27739
  MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 Nevada
90-0315909(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
 
 7044 Portal Way, Unit K-110
 Ferndale, WA  98248
 (Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
  (403) 288-4321
 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
  Royal Quantum Group, Inc.
 (Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
 if changed since last report)
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 Yes x     No o
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
 Yes xNo o
 
 
 
 1
 Table of Contents
 
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (check one):
 
 Large accelerated filer
o

Accelerated filer
oNon-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
x
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
 Yes oNo x
  APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
 PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
 Yes oNo o
  APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
  As of November 15, 2012, there were 41,059,845 shares of the registrant’s $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.
 
 
         2
 Table of Contents
 
 
 TABLEOF CONTENTS
 PAGEPART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
4ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
17ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
22ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
22PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
23ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
23ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
24ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
24ITEM 3.
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
24ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
24ITEM 5.
OTHER INFORMATION
24ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
25








3
 Table of Contents






PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


MINERALRITE CORPORATION(Formerly Royal Quantum Group, Inc.)CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETSSeptember 30,


December 31,2012


2011(Unaudited)ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
9,365


$
42,890Accounts receivable


39,792



61,486Prepaid expense


1,407



-Total current assets


50,564



104,376Property and equipment:Furniture and fixtures


1,851



1,851Less: accumulated depreciation


(1,851
)


(1,851
)Total property and equipment, net


-



-Other assets:Proved oil and gas properties, full cost method


560,797



604,083Less: accumulated depletion


(220,982
)


(223,447
)Unproved oil and gas properties


-



17,507Deferred offering costs


12,210



98,357Total other assets


352,025



496,500Total assets

$
402,589


$
600,876








The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements




4
 Table of Contents






MINERALRITE CORPORATION(Formerly Royal Quantum Group, Inc.)CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETSSeptember 30,


December 31,2012


2011(Unaudited)LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable

$
184,090


$
128,339Royalties due stockholders


18,727



36,303Related party payables


418,174



333,674Notes payable


-



424,948Stockholder loans


19,845



19,845Total current liabilities


640,836



943,109Long-term liabilities:Asset retirement obligation


11,725



11,725Total long-term liabilities


11,725



11,725Total liabilities


652,561



954,834Stockholders' Deficit:Preferred stock, par value $.001authorized 10,000,000 sharesno shares issued at September 30, 2012and December 31, 2011


-



-Common stock, par value $.001Issued 1,059,845 shares at September 30, 2012and 1,059,845 shares at December 31, 2011


1,060



1,060Additional paid-in capital


5,485,379



5,485,377Accumulated deficit


(5,720,548
)


(5,812,024
)Other comprehensive gain/(loss)


(15,863
)


(28,371
)Total stockholders' deficit


(249,972
)


(353,958
)Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit

$
402,589


$
600,876








The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements




5
 Table of Contents






MINERALRITE CORPORATION(Formerly Royal Quantum Group, Inc.)CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - UnauditedFor the Three Months


For the Nine MonthsSeptember 30,


September 30,2012


2011


2012


2011Oil revenue

$
71,802


$
90,556


$
281,986


$
398,842Operating expensesProduction costs


48,670



43,054



133,627



158,050Royalty expense


21,825



43,826



117,432



197,533Related party consulting fees


45,000



45,000



135,000



135,000Related party rent expense


3,956



4,105



11,909



12,041Professional fees


36,154



35,890



186,816



70,084General & administrative


6,175



4,018



15,092



23,675Total operating expenses


(161,780
)


(175,893
)


(599,876
)


(596,383
)Loss from operations


(89,978
)


(85,337
)


(317,890
)


(197,541
)Other income (expenses)Gain on extinguishment of debt


437,883



-



437,883



-Interest expense


(3,291
)


(11,928
)


(28,517
)


(35,015
)Total other income (expense)


434,592



(11,928
)


409,366



(35,015
)Net Income (loss)


344,614



(97,265
)


91,476



(232,556
)Other comprehensive incomeForeign currency translation adjustment


(5,774
)


24,136



12,508



16,486Total comprehensive income (loss)

$
338,840


$
(73,129
)

$
103,984


$
(216,070
)Net income (loss) per common share:Income (loss) per share - Basic and diluted

$
0.33


$
(0.10
)

$
0.09


$
(0.23
)Weighted average shares outstanding


1,059,845



1,008,937



1,059,845



1,006,432






The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements




6
 Table of Contents






MINERALRITE CORPORATION(Formerly Royal Quantum Group, Inc.)CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UnauditedFor the Nine Months endedSeptember 30,2012


2011CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net Income (loss)

$
91,476


$
(232,556
)Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) tonet cash provided by (used in) operating activities:Depreciation expense


-



186Depletion expense


48,647



62,265Gain on settlement of indebtedness


(437,883
)


-Offering costs charged to operations


98,357



-(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable


21,694



6,804(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses


(1,322
)


(3,030
)Increase (decrease) in accrued interest on notes payable


28,517



44,135Increase (decrease) in accounts payable


55,753



(36,218
)Increase (decrease) in royalties due stockholders


(17,576
)


(2,950
)Increase (decrease) in related party accounts payable


84,500



62,000Net cash (used in) operating activities


(27,837
)


(99,364
)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:Investment in oil and gas properties


9,681



(193,897
)Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities


9,681



(193,897
)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Proceeds from sale of units consisting of common stock and oil and gasroyalties


-



160,000Deferred offering costs


(12,210
)


-Payment in connection with settlement of indebtedness


(2,461
)


-Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities


(14,671
)


160,000Effect of exchange rates on cash


(698
)


(8,528
)Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents


(33,525
)


(141,789
)Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period


42,890



205,102Cash and cash equivalents - end of period

$
9,365


$
63,313SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:Cash paid during the year for:Interest

$
-


$
-Income taxes

$
-


$
-SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTINGAND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Value of stock based offering costs charged to expense

$
98,357


$
-Value of issuance of participating units for servicesrendered in connection with private offerings

$
-


$
15,000






The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements




7
 Table of Contents







MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
   NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION


MineralRite Corporation (“the Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on October 22, 1996 under its original name PSM Corp.  The Company changed its emphasis to the exploration and development of natural resources and on November 23, 2005 changed its name to Royal Quantum Group, Inc. On October 18, 2012, the Company again changed its name from Royal Quantum Group, Inc. to MineralRite Corporation. On August 31, 2012, the Company declared a 50-for-1 reverse stock split of its common stock. All references in the accompanying financials to the number of shares outstanding and per-share amounts have been restated to reflect this stock split.
 
 Interim Financial Statements
 
 MineralRite Corporation’s interim financial statements are unaudited. They contain all necessary adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) for a fair statement of the referenced interim period results.  These interim period results do not indicate expected full-year results or results for future periods, due to several factors, including price volatility of crude oil and natural gas, price volatility of commodity derivatives, volatility of interest rates, estimates of reserves, drilling risks, geological risks, transportation restrictions, timing of acquisitions, product demand, market competition, interruption(s) in production, our ability to obtain additional capital, and the success of proposed enhanced oil recovery work (EOR). These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2012.
 
 The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the financial statements and disclosures of contingencies.  Actual results may differ from those estimates. The Company has made assumptions in valuing its oil and natural gas reserves, which may affect the amounts at which oil and natural gas properties are recorded.   The Company has also computed the components of the investments units sold in its private offerings using assumptions such as volatility, expected life and the risk-free interest rate.
 
 Going Concern
 
 The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.  The Company has incurred substantial losses from operations and has a working capital deficit, which history and circumstance raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company had a loss from operations of $317,890 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2012 of $5,720,548.  The Company has raised sufficient funds through the private sale of participating units to acquire working interests in nine oil and gas wells. Six of the wells are currently producing as of September 30, 2012 and one well has been abandoned.  Total gross revenue generated from these six wells during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 amounted to $281,986.  Although the Company has been successful in raising the necessary funds to acquire these working interests and has been able to generate net revenue from these wells, there is no assurance that these
 
 
 8
 Table of Contents
 
  MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
 
 
 wells will continue to generate positive cash flow. Currently the net revenue generated from these wells is not sufficient to fund all of the Company’s operating costs. The Company is seeking to raise additional funds to acquire other oil and gas properties; however, there is no assurance that the necessary funds will be raised or even if the funds are raised, that the working interest acquired in the future will generate sufficient revenue to assist in the financing of the Company’s operations.  Until such funding is obtained and/or positive results from planned property development materialize, doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern may remain.
   NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
 For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.
 
 Use of Estimates
 
 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
 Accounts Receivable
 
 Accounts receivable are reported at the customer’s outstanding balances less any allowance for doubtful accounts.  Interest is not accrued on overdue accounts receivable.
 
 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
 An allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable is charged to operations in amounts sufficient to maintain the allowance for uncollectible accounts at a level management believes is adequate to cover any probable losses.  Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on historical write-off percentages and information collected from individual customers.  Accounts receivable are charged off against the allowance when collectibility is determined to be permanently impaired.  Management has determined that as of September 30, 2012, no allowance was required.
 
 Revenue Recognition
 
 Oil and gas production revenues are recognized at the point of sale.
 
 Oil and Gas Properties
 
 The Company uses the full cost method of accounting under which all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves, including costs related to unsuccessful wells and estimated future site restoration and abandonment, are capitalized until such time as the aggregate of such costs net of accumulated depletion and oil and natural gas related deferred income taxes, on a country-by-country basis, equals the sum of 1) the discounted present value (at 10%), using prices as of the end of each reporting period on a constant basis, of the Company’s estimated future net cash flows from estimated production of proved oil and natural gas reserves as
 
 
 9
 Table of Contents
   MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
 
 
 determined by independent petroleum consultants, less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves but excluding future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations accrued on the balance sheet; plus 2) the cost of major development projects and unproven properties not subject to depletion, if any; plus 3) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in costs subject to depletion; less 4) related income tax effects.  If net capitalized costs exceed this limit, the excess is expensed unless subsequent market price changes eliminate or reduce the indicated write-down in accordance with U.S. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 12D.  Depletion is computed using the units-of-production method whereby capitalized costs, net of estimated salvage values, plus estimated future costs to develop proved reserves and satisfy asset retirement obligations, are amortized over the total estimated proved reserves on a country-by-country basis.  Investments in major development projects are not depleted until either proved reserves are associated with the projects or impairment has been determined.
 
 Property and Equipment
 
 Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided over the five-year estimated useful life of the assets computed on the straight-line method.
 
 Gains and losses resulting from sales and dispositions of property and equipment are included in current operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted $0 and $0, respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted $0 and $186, respectively.
 
 Foreign Currency Translation
 
 The Company's primary functional currency is the U.S. dollar.  For foreign operations whose functional currency is the local foreign currency, balance sheet accounts are translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of the year and income statement accounts are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Translation gains and losses are included as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit.
 
 Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
 The Company’s revenue is dependent upon the successful efforts of the respective well’s operator. Currently production from the Company’s six wells is sold to one customer.
  Loss per Share of Common Stock
  The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification “ASC” Topic 260-10, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been presented since the effect of the assumed conversion of warrants and debt to purchase common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. Potential common shares as of September 30, 2012 that have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share consist of (a) warrants to purchase 14,000 (post-split) shares of the Company’s common stock and (b) Unit holders’ options to convert their respective oil revenue interests into a total 24,030 (post-split)  shares of the Company’s common stock.
   10
 Table of Contents
   MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
   Asset Retirement Obligations
 
 The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and similar state statutes require mine properties to be restored in accordance with specified standards. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 410-20 requires recognition of an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) for eventual reclamation of disturbed acreage remaining after mining has been completed. The Company records its reclamation obligations on a permit-by-permit basis using requirements as determined by the Office of Surface Mining of the U.S. Department of the Interior (“OSM”). The liability is calculated based upon the reclamation activities remaining after removal ceases, assuming that reclamation activities have been contemporaneous within state and federal guidelines during mining. A liability is recorded for the estimated future cost that a third party would incur to perform the required reclamation and mine closure discounted at the Company’s credit-adjusted risk-free rate. A corresponding increase in the asset carrying value of mineral rights is also recorded. The ARO asset is amortized on the units-of-production method over the proven and probable reserves associated with that permit.
 
 Long-Lived Assets
 
 The Company accounts for its long-lived assets in accordance with ASC No. 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment.” ASC No. 360 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the historical cost carrying value of an asset may no longer be appropriate.  The Company assesses recoverability of the carrying value of an asset by estimating the future net cash flows expected to result from the asset, including eventual disposition.  If the future net cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the difference between the asset’s carrying value and fair value or disposable value. As of September 30, 2012, the Company does not believe there has been any impairment of its long-lived assets.
 
 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
 Pursuant to ASC No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” the Company is required to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments included on its balance sheet as of September 30, 2012. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivables, payables, and other obligations.  The Company considers the carrying value of such amounts in the financial statements to approximate their fair value.
 
 Income Taxes
 
 The Company accounts for its income taxes under the provisions of ASC No. 740 “Income Taxes.” The method of accounting for income taxes under ASC No. 740 is an asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between tax bases and financial reporting bases of other assets and   liabilities.
 
 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
 From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies issue new accounting pronouncements. Updates to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are communicated through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”). Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be adopted in the future, is not expected to be material to the Company’s condensed financial statements upon adoption.
   11
 Table of Contents
   MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
   Other Comprehensive Income
  In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends current comprehensive income guidance. The update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, an entity is required to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance is now effective for our Company The guidance impacts our disclosures, but it does not impact the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
   NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT IN OIL & GAS PROPERTY
 
 As of September 30, 2012, the Company’s accrued asset retirement obligation totaled $11,725 and this amount was included in the capitalized cost of the oil and gas properties. Depletion expense is included in production expense as reflected in the accompanying condensed statements of operations. Depletion expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $13,119 and $15,469, respectively. Depletion expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $48,647 and $62,265, respectively.  During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company charged against accumulated depletion the $10,000 deposit it had on the on Flat Creek lease as the option to drill on the property expired. Further, during the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company determined that its interest in the Bond #3 well was commercially unproductive and the well was abandoned. The well’s cost basis of $47,866 was also charged against accumulated depletion pursuant to ASC Topic 932-360-40 “Extractive Activities.”
 
 
 NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
 The Company has entered into a month-to-month lease agreement with Trio Gold for an office in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Trio Gold’s President is the father of Ron Ruskowsky, the former President and CEO of the Company.  This lease can be canceled on one month’s written notice. The lease agreement was amended in February 2011 which increased rental payments from approximately $450 to $1,300 per month plus applicable taxes.  The Company incurred rent expense of $3,956 and $4,105 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company incurred rent expense of $11,909 and $12,041 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
 
 Mr. Ruskowsky provides services through a consulting agreement that the Company has with Santeo Financial for $15,000 per month. The $15,000 monthly fee is accrued by the Company and is reduced by amounts actually paid. As of September 30, 2012, the Company owed Santeo Financial $413,193.  Consulting fees expensed during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $45,000 and $45,000, respectively.  Consulting fees expensed during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $135,000 and $135,000, respectively. Mr. Ruskowsky owns a controlling interest in Santeo Financial.  In October 2012, Santeo Financial assigned $200,000 of the debt the Company owed it to Mr. Guy Peckham, the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer.
 
 As of September 30, 2012, the Company owed Roger Janssen, an officer and director of the Company, $1,345 for services previously performed.
 
 
   12
 Table of Contents
 
  MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
   As of September 30, 2012, the Company owed Phil Van Angren, an officer and director of the Company, $3,636 for consulting services previously performed.
  As of September 30, 2012, certain shareholders have advanced the Company a total of $19,845 that is payable on demand and is non-interest bearing.
   NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE
 
 On July 23, 2012, the Company settled the total balance owed Integrated Business Concepts, Inc. of $434,632 for $2,461. The Company realized a gain on extinguishment of debt including cumulative foreign currency adjustments totaling $437,883, which was credited to income. Interest accrued and charged to operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $3,291 and $11,928, respectively. Interest accrued and charged to operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $28,517 and $35,015, respectively.
 
 
 NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES
 
 Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
  The effective tax rate on the net loss before income taxes differs from the U.S. statutory rate as follows:
  September 30,2012

2011Current expense - BenefitFederal

$
-


$
-State


-



-Total current expense (benefit)


-



-Deferred BenefitFederal

$
-


$
-State


-



-Total deferred benefit


-



-U.S statutory rate


34.00
%

$
34.00
%Less valuation allowance


-34.00
%


-34.00
%Effective tax rate


0.00
%


0.00
%   13
 Table of Contents
   MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
   The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
  Deferred tax assetsNet operating losses


1,221,735



1,279,2491,221,735



1,279,249Less valuation allowance


(1,221,735
)


(1,279,249
)Deferred tax asset - net valuation allowance

$
--


$
--
 
 The net change in the valuation allowance for 2012 was $57,514.
  At September 30, 2012, The Company has a net operating loss carryover of approximately $3,593,339 available to offset future income for income tax reporting purposes, which will expire in various years through 2032, if not previously utilized.
 
 The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, formerly FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” The Company had no material unrecognized income tax assets or liabilities for the periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
 
 The Company’s policy regarding income tax interest and penalties is to expense those items as general and administrative expense but to identify them for tax purposes. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no income tax, or related interest and penalty items in the income statement, or liability on the balance sheet. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or state income tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2009. The Company is not currently involved in any income tax examinations.
 
 
 NOTE 7 - COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS
 
 The following table sets forth common share purchase warrants (post-split) outstanding as of September 30, 2012:
 
 Warrants Outstanding


Weighted Average Exercise PriceBalance, December 31, 2011


35,840


$
12.50Warrants granted


-


$
-Warrants expired


(21,840
)

$
12.50Balance, September 30, 2012


14,000


$
12.50
  
 14
 Table of Contents
   MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
   NOTE 8 - FAIR VALUE
 
 The Company’s financial instruments consist of principally related party payables and stockholder loans. The Company believes all of the financial instruments’ recorded values approximate fair market value because of their nature and respective durations.
 
 The Company complies with the provisions of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”).  ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. ASC 820-10-35, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures - Subsequent Measurement” (“ASC 820-10-35”), clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC 820-10-35 also requires that a fair value measurement reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model.  The Company also follows ASC 825 “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” previously referred to as FAS 107-1 to expand required disclosures.
 
 ASC 820-10-35 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10-35 are described below:
 
 Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.
 
 Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
 Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
 
 The Company utilizes the best available information in measuring fair value. The following table summarizes, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012:
 
 September 30, 2012Fair Value MeasurementsLevel 1


Level 2


Level 3


Total Fair ValueLiabilitiesRelated party payables


-


$
418,174



-


$
418,174Stockholder loans


-


$
19,845



-


$
19,845
    15
 Table of Contents
   MINERALRITE CORPORATION
 (FORMERLY ROYAL QUANTUM GROUP, INC.)
 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
   NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT
  Effective October 30, 2012, the Company issued a total of 40,000,000 shares of its common stock to new management and other consultants for future services.The shares were valued at $520,000.
 
                16
 Table of Contents
  ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
 
 The following Management's Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with MineralRite Corporation’s financial statements and the related notes thereto. The Management's Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “expect,” and the like, and/or future-tense or conditional constructions (“will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc.), or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this Report on Form 10-Q. The Company’s actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Report on Form 10-Q.
  The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial data included elsewhere in this report. See also the notes to our consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
  Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
  The discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s condensed financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. In consultation with the Company’s Board of Directors, management has identified the following accounting policies that it believes are key to an understanding of its financial statements. These are important accounting policies that require management’s most difficult, subjective judgments.
  Revenue Recognition
  The Company recognizes oil and gas revenue from its interest in producing wells as oil and gas is sold from those wells.
  Oil and Gas Properties
  The Company uses the full-cost method of accounting under which all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves, including costs related to unsuccessful wells and estimated future site restoration and abandonment, are capitalized until such time as the aggregate of such costs net of accumulated depletion and oil and natural gas related deferred income taxes, on a country-by-country basis, equals the sum of 1)
 
 
 
 17
 Table of Contents
 
 
 the discounted present value (at 10%), using prices as of the end of each reporting period on a constant basis, of the Company’s estimated future net cash flows from estimated production of proven oil and natural gas reserves as determined by independent petroleum consultants, less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proven reserves but excluding future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations accrued on the balance sheet; plus 2) the cost of major development projects and unproven properties not subject to depletion, if any; plus 3) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in costs subject to depletion; less 4) related income tax effects. If net capitalized costs exceed this limit, the excess is expensed unless subsequent market price changes eliminate or reduce the indicated write-down in accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 12D. Depletion is computed using the units-of-production method whereby capitalized costs, net of estimated salvage values, plus estimated future costs to develop proven reserves and satisfy asset retirement obligations, are amortized over the total estimated producing life of the well.
  Foreign Currency Translation
  The Company's primary functional currency is the U.S. dollar. For foreign operations whose functional currency is the local currency, balance sheet accounts are translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of the year and income statement accounts are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Translation gains and losses are included as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit.
  Asset Retirement Obligations
  The Company use Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 410-20, Asset Retirement Obligations, which established accounting standards for recognition and measurement of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) and the associated asset retirement costs. The provisions of ASC Topic 410-20 apply to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or normal operation of a long-lived asset. ASC Topic 410-20 also requires companies to recognize a liability for the fair value of a legal obligation to perform asset retirement activities that are conditional on a future event, if the amount can be reasonably estimated.
  Fair Value Measurement
  The Company adopted ACS Topic 820-10, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“Topic 820-10”), at the beginning of fiscal year 2009 to measure the fair value of certain of its financial assets and liabilities required to be measured on a recurring basis. The adoption of Topic 820-10 did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements)
 
 
 18
 Table of Contents
 
 
 and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under Topic 820-10 are described below:
  Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access. The Company has no Level 1 assets or liabilities.
  Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company has no Level 2 assets. The Company’s Level 2 liabilities consist of related party payables, notes payable, and stockholder loans. Due to the short-term nature of related party payables and stockholders loans, the fair values of these instruments approximate their respective carrying values. The Company determines the fair value of notes payable based on the effective yields of similar obligations.
  Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The Company has no Level 3 assets or liabilities.
  Liquidity and Capital Resources.
  For the Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2012 versus September 30, 2011
  During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash used in the Company’s operating activities totaled $(27,837) compared to $(99,364) during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash provided by investing activities totaled $9,681 compared to $(193,897) used during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $9,681 consisted of $6,801 in refunds on previouslycapitalized well expenditures and $2,880 from the sale of deep bore rights. The $193,897 consisted of costs incurred in the Company’s oil and gas venturesDuring the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash decreased $(33,525) as compared to $(141,789) during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
  At September 30, 2012, the Company had cash of $9,365,accounts receivable of $39,792, and prepaid expenses of $1,407 that comprised the Company’s total current assets totaling $50,564. The Company’s property and equipment at September 30, 2012 had a net book value of $0, consisting of furniture and fixtures with a cost basis of $1,851 net of accumulated depreciation of $1,851. The Company also had accumulated net capitalized costs of oil & gas properties totaling $339,815 at September 30, 2012, while the Company’s total assets at September 30, 2012 were $402,589.
  At September 30, 2012, the Company had total current liabilities totaling $640,836 consisting of $184,090 in accounts payable, $18,727 due certain shareholders on their interest in the Company’s oil and gas net revenue, $418,174 due to related parties, and $19,845 in shareholder loans. Additionally, the Company’s long-term debt at September 30, 2012 included $11,725 on the Company’s accrued asset recovery obligations relating to its oil and gas properties.
 
 
 19
 Table of Contents
 
 
 Therefore, at September 30, 2012, the Company had total liabilities of $652,561. The Company had no other long-term liabilities, commitments or contingencies. Other than anticipated explorations costs associated with the mineral and oil interests that the Company acquired and the anticipated increases in the legal and accounting costs associated with being a public company, Company management is not aware of any other known trends, events or uncertainties which may affect the Company’s future liquidity.
  At September 30, 2012, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit totaling $249,972compared to $353,958 at the period ending December 31, 2011.
  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
  For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 versus September 30, 2011
  The Company’s revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $281,986 with associated production and royalty costs of $251,059 as compared to September 30, 2011 revenue totaling $398,842 and with production and royalty costs for the year of $355,583. The Company incurred administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 totaling $348,817 that included related party consulting fees of $135,000, related party rent of $11,909, professional fees of $186,816, and other general and administrative expenses of $15,092. Administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $240,800 and included related party consulting fees of $135,000, related party rent of $12,041, professional fees of $70,084, and other general and administrative expenses of $23,675.
  For the three Months Ended September 30, 2012 versus September 30, 2011
  The Company’s revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $71,802 with associated production and royalty costs of $70,495 as compared to September 30, 2011 revenue totaling $90,556 and with production and royalty costs for the year of $86,880. The Company incurred administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 totaling $91,285, that included related party consulting fees of $45,000, related party rent of $3,956, professional fees of $36,154, and other general and administrative expenses of $6,175. Administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $89,013 and included related party consulting fees of $45,000, related party rent of $4,105, professional fees of $35,890, and other general and administrative expenses of $4,018.
  The Company’s Plan of Operation for the Next Twelve Months.
  The Company plans to shift its focus away from oil and gas, mineral and resources properties for exploration and development and toward the extraction of metals from ore extracted from mines.  To that end, the Company has installed new management with expertise in that industry, and changed the name of the Company from Royal Quantum Group, Inc. to MineralRite Corporation.  On August 31, 2012 the Board of Directors enacted and approved a reverse stock split on a 1:50 basis, which reverse split has had the effect of reducing the number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock from 52,991,272 to approximately 1,059,845.
   20
 Table of Contents
  
 On August 17, 2012 the Board of Directors appointed Guy Peckham as President and Chief Executive Officer for the purpose of leading the Company in the commencement of new businessventures, and to raise additional capital to pursue such new opportunities. Mr. Peckham is or will be engaged in the following activities:
  (a) Mr. Peckham has negotiated a modification of the Consulting Agreement between the Company and Santeo Financial Corporation (“Santeo”), which will result in a material reduction of the amount owed to Santeo;
  (b) Mr. Peckham will plan and execute against a new business model for the Company, which will entail the extraction of precious metals from previously extracted ore; providing his own expertise and track record of success in that industry, and has or will recruit and hire a management team with a similar track record of successful execution against that business model.
  In addition, Mr. Peckham has engaged the individuals and entities listed in Item 5.01 of the Company’s form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on November 6, 2012 (which is incorporated herein by reference) to assist him (a) by identifying and accessing the Company’s sources of raw materials and supplies,(b) by identifying and acquiring its proposed processing facilities, (c) by providing the analytical and processing know-how needed to produce the planned products, (d) by identifying and accessing theCompany’s new markets and customers, domestic and international, (e) by providing start-up working capital and costs, (f) in the design and implementation of the Company’s recapitalization, and (g) inmanaging the Company and executing the new business plan and model.The Board of Directors has determined that the individuals and entities listed in Item 5.01 thereof have or will provide (1) consulting, scientific, engineering, production and professional servicesto the Company, via contracts to be executed, (2) planning, market research, capital formation and structuring services to the Company via contracts to be executed, as well as the funding of certainstartup costs, and (3) sales and marketing services to the Company, via contracts to be executed, both domestically and internationally.
  Following the issuance of those 40,000,000 shares to Mr. Peckham and the other persons and entities, the Board of Directors is expected to approve the issuance of other shares of the Company’s common stock to certainaccredited investors in connection with a private placement offering exempt from registration with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
  The Company intends to retain its oil and gas, mineral and resources properties pending the private placement of that stock and the funding of the metal extraction operations, and may decide to divest those assets in the coming months.
    21
 Table of Contents
  
 The Company’s forecast for the period for which the Company’s financial resources will be adequate to support operations involves risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ as a result of a number of factors. The Company will need to raise additional capital to expand operations to the point at which the Company is able to operate profitably. Other than anticipated explorations costs associated with the resources and mineral interests that the Company acquires and the anticipated increases in the legal and accounting costs associated with being a public company, and the costs associated with funding the metal extraction operations, the Company is not aware of any other known trends, events or uncertainties, which may affect the Company’s future liquidity.
  In the event that the Company experiences a shortfall in capital, the Company intends to pursue opportunities to raise funds through public or private financing as well as through borrowings and via other resources, such as the Company’s officers, directors and principal shareholders. The Company cannot guaranty that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, then the Company’s ability to expand operations may be significantly hindered. If adequate funds are not available, the Company believes that the Company’s officers, directors and principal shareholders will contribute funds to pay for the Company’s expenses to achieve the Company’s objectives over the next twelve months. The Company’s belief that the Company’s officers, directors and principal shareholders will pay the Company’s expenses is based on the fact that the Company’s officers, directors and principal shareholders collectively own approximately 97.42% of the Company’s outstanding common stock and will likely continue to pay the Company’s expenses as long as they maintain their ownership of the Company’s common stock, so long as they do not incur financial hardship.
  The Company is not currently conducting any research and development activities and management does not anticipate conducting such activities in the near future. Management does not anticipate future purchases or sales of any significant equipment. In the event that the Company’s customer base expands, then management may need to hire additional employees or independent contractors as well as purchase or lease additional equipment.
  ITEM 3.     QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
  We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.
  ITEM 4.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
  Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by our company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as
 
 
 22
 Table of Contents
 
 
 appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act").
  Based on this evaluation, our principal executive and principal financial and accounting officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were effective as of September 30, 2012.
  Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
  Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
  Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
  Changes In Internal Control and Financial Reporting
  QUARTERLY EVENTS
  As previously reported in Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the commission on August 6,2012, Ron Ruskowsky resigned from all positions with the Company, including but not limited to, that of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director on July 31, 2012 and Roger Janssen was appointed to replace him. The resignation was not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.
  As of August 17, 2012, Guy Peckham was appointed as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer.  Mr. Janssen remains as Chairman of the Board of Directors, Secretary and Treasurer.
  PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
  ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
  None.
   23
 Table of Contents
  
 ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS
  We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.
  ITEM 2.     UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
  1.  Quarterly Issuances:
  During the quarter, we did not issue any unregistered securities other than as previously disclosed.
  2.  Subsequent Issuances:
  Subsequent to the quarter, we issuedunregistered securities, as follows. On and after October 30, 2012, the Company has or will enter into Purchase Agreements with the followingpersons and entities, pursuant to which they are to be issued a total of 40,000,000 common shares. The consideration for the sale of these shares was services performed for the Company, or to be performed.If the purchase agreements with respect to these shares are consummated, voting control of the Company will be transferred to the above-referenced individuals and entities, who will then own sharescomprising 97.42% of the total votes of all shareholders. Before this Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities, and following the recent reverse split of the common stock, the Company had approximately1,059,845 shares issued and outstanding. The Board of Directors approved the issuance, and the Board’s resolution was approved by a majority of the then-outstanding 1,059,845 shares.
  James Bame is the beneficial owner of two of the purchasers, Management Team Escrow #1-James Bame Attorney and Management Team Escrow #1-James Bame Attorney (“Purchasers”). If thepurchase agreement with respect to the Purchasers is consummated, Mr. Bame will be the beneficial owner of approximately 9,500,000 shares, or 23.14% of the issued and outstanding stock of theCompany.
  ITEM 3.     DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
  None.
  ITEM 4.     MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
  Not Applicable
  ITEM 5.     OTHER INFORMATION
  None.
   24
 Table of Contents
  
 ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS
 ExhibitNumber

DescriptionExhibits filed herewith:3.11

Amended Bylaws (as amended through August 31, 2012)31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and President Pursuant to Rule 13a-1431.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-1432.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 
 SIGNATURES
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
  MINERALRITE CORPORATIONDated: November 15, 2012
By:
/s/ GuyPeckhamGuy PeckhamChief Executive Officer and PresidentChief Financial Officer