alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

January 14, 2016 

WILLIAM R. SNODGRASS TENNESSEE TOWER 

312 ROSAL. PARKS AVENUE, 15TH FLOOR 

NASHVILLE, TN 37243 

Ms. Heather McTeer Toney 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region IV 

Atlanta Federal Center, 1 ih Floor 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Subject: Request to Redesignate Shelby County, Tennessee, to Attainment for the 2008 

8-Hour Ozone NAAQS and to Incorporate a Maintenance Plan for the 2008 8-

Hour Ozone NAAQS for Shelby County into Tennessee's SIP 

Dear Administrator McTeer Toney: 

Tennessee is requesting EPA redesignate the Shelby County portion of the Memphis 

TN-MS-AR nonattainment area for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) to attainment as per Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 107(d)(3). The 

area was designated nonattainment for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS effective July 

20, 2012. Recent ozone air quality data shows the area is now attaining the 2008 8-

Hour Ozone NAAQS. 

Tennessee is also requesting the EPA incorporate into the Tennessee State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) a revision to the Shelby County portion of the SIP. This 

submittal contains a CAA Section 175A maintenance plan for Shelby County with 

respect to the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. 

In addition, this submission also contains a 2011 emissions inventory. This inventory, 

separate from that of the maintenance plan, is being submitted to meet the 

requirements of CAA Section 182(a)(1 ). 

A public hearing was held on December 15th, 2015. See Attachment IV of the SIP 

revision for documentation of the public announcement and comments and responses. 

The Air Pollution Control Board of the State of Tennessee approved the SIP revision on 

January 13th, 2016. 
Revision to the Shelby County Portion of the TN SIP 

January 14, 2016 

Page 2 of 2 

The hard copies of the documentation attached are identical to those included on the 

compact disk sent with this submittal. Included on the compact disk are all of the 

supporting documents and attachments referenced in the narrative. These include the 

inventory documentation, MOVES run input and output files, point and areas source 

inventories and a collection of additional supporting information. Should you need 

further information, please feel free to contact Marc Corrigan (Marc.Corrigan@tn.gov or 

(615) 532-0616) on my staff. 

Sincerely, 

~~Technical 

Tennessee 

Secretary 

Air Pollution Control Board 

~ 

cc: (electronically) 

Mr. R. Scott Davis, Branch Chief US EPA; Davis.Scottr@epa.gov 

Ms. Lynorae Benjamin, US EPA; Benjamin.Lynorae@epa.gov 

Mr. Brad Akers, US EPA; Akers.Brad@epa.gov 

Mr. Robert Rogers, Shelby County Air Pollution Control Program; 

Bob. Rogers@shelbycou ntytn. gov 

Mr. Marc Corrigan, DAPC; Marc.Corrigan@tn.gov
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3186 

To make it unlawful to alter or remove the identification number of a 

mobile device. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To make it unlawful to alter or remove the identification 

number of a mobile device. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mobile Device Theft 

5 Deterrence Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALTERING OR REMOVING CELLULAR TELEPHONE 

7 IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 25 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3186 IS

1 ‘‘§ 515. Altering or removing mobile device identifica2 tion numbers 

3 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

4 ‘‘(1) the term ‘manufacturer’ means a person 

5 who has lawfully obtained the right to assign a mo6 bile device identification number to a mobile device 

7 before the initial sale of the mobile device; and 

8 ‘‘(2) the term ‘mobile device identification num9 ber’ means an international mobile equipment iden10 tity number, electronic serial number, or any other 

11 number or signal that identifies a specific mobile 

12 wireless communications device. 

13 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in sub14 section (d), it shall be unlawful to— 

15 ‘‘(1) knowingly remove, obliterate, tamper with, 

16 or alter a mobile device identification number; or 

17 ‘‘(2) knowingly use, produce, traffic in, have 

18 control or custody of, or possess hardware or soft19 ware, knowing it has been configured to engage in 

20 the conduct described in paragraph (1). 

21 ‘‘(c) PENALTY.—Any person who violates subsection 

22 (b) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more 

23 than 5 years, or both. 

24 ‘‘(d) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (b) shall not apply to 

25 the manufacturer of a mobile device or a person who re26 pairs or refurbishes a mobile device unless the manufacVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:27 May 16, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3186.IS S3186

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3186 IS

1 turer or person knows that the mobile device or part in2 volved is stolen.’’. 

3 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

4 The table of sections for chapter 25 of title 18, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relat6 ing to section 514 the following: 

‘‘515. Altering or removing mobile device identification numbers.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------



                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


     I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
     Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect
     of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWABS
     Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2004-I;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
     whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
     report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
     required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the
     pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
     reports is included in these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
     servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
     upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
     agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer
     has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
     upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
     conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
     Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
     pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
     reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee.


     Date: March 29, 2005


                                       /s/ Steve Bailey
                                       ----------------
                                       Steve Bailey
                                       Senior Managing Director
|   |  |                                        |  |            
|-- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | -----------
|   |  |                                        |  | LOGO       
|   |  |                                       
|E7 |  | SHELL ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F 2013 |  | EXHIBIT 7.1



|           
|-----------
|EXHIBIT 7.1



|                                                  |  |  |           | 
|------------------------------------------------- |  |  | --------- | 
|CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
CHARGES |  |  | $ MILLION | 

|                                                                              |  |  |        |  |  |  |        |     |  |  |        |     |  |  |        |  |  |  |        | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | ------ |  |  |  | ------ | --- |  |  | ------ | --- |  |  | ------ |  |  |  | ------ | 
|                                                                              |  |  | 2013   |  |  |  | 2012   | [A] |  |  | 2011   | [A] |  |  | 2010   |  |  |  | 2009   | 
|Pre-tax income from continuing operations before income from equity investees |  |  | 26,317 |  |  |  | 41,564 |     |  |  | 46,806 |     |  |  | 29,391 |  |  |  | 16,044 | 
|Total fixed charges                                                           |  |  | 1,710  |  |  |  | 1,712  |     |  |  | 1,608  |     |  |  | 1,684  |  |  |  | 1,669  | 
|Distributed income from equity investees                                      |  |  | 7,117  |  |  |  | 10,573 |     |  |  | 9,681  |     |  |  | 6,519  |  |  |  | 4,903  | 
|Less: interest capitalised                                                    |  |  | 762    |  |  |  | 567    |     |  |  | 674    |     |  |  | 969    |  |  |  | 1,088  | 
|Total earnings                                                                |  |  | 34,382 |  |  |  | 53,282 |     |  |  | 57,421 |     |  |  | 36,625 |  |  |  | 21,528 | 
|Interest expensed and capitalised                                             |  |  | 1,412  |  |  |  | 1,461  |     |  |  | 1,209  |     |  |  | 1,218  |  |  |  | 902    | 
|Interest within rental expense                                                |  |  | 298    |  |  |  | 251    |     |  |  | 399    |     |  |  | 466    |  |  |  | 767    | 
|Total fixed charges                                                           |  |  | 1,710  |  |  |  | 1,712  |     |  |  | 1,608  |     |  |  | 1,684  |  |  |  | 1,669  | 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                            |  |  | 20.11  |  |  |  | 31.12  |     |  |  | 35.71  |     |  |  | 21.75  |  |  |  | 12.90  | 

[A] Revised IAS 19 Employee Benefits has been adopted with effect from January 1, 2013, with retrospective application to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for 2011 and 2012, reflected in the data above. See Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NTP Comments on 1,2,4- and 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene

This IRIS draft was prepared using a new format that has substantially decreased the 

unnecessary repetitions. The preamble section is extremely helpful for new readers and even 

the regulars. However, the formatting changes have also resulted into limited information on 

the studies that are critical and supportive of the guidance values derived. Therefore it is 

difficult to fully ascertain the scientific strengths or weaknesses from the summaries of the data 

presented. Also, the order of the sections in the document does not flow logically. Hopefully, 

these minor formatting issues would be sorted out with time. 

Overall, we find the relevant information on the toxicology of the chemicals very well 

summarized. We have the following comments for the authors to consider while revising the 

document: 

1. It would be informative if the proportions all three isomers of the commercially 

available TMB are provided in the document. 

2. Table 1 should also have the relevant information on 1,2,3-TMB isomer. 

3. On page 21, under Programmatic Interest, please provide the reasons why there is no 

interest in 1,2,3-TMB. 

4. Page 44, if the hypothesized mode of action is relevant to humans, shouldn’t that 

reduce the uncertainty factor for deriving the numbers? 

5. Page 84, Is the 1,2,4-TMB PBPK model validated enough to derive RfD from the 

inhalation studies? 

6. We recommend inclusion of EPA recommendations/need for additional studies to 

reduce the uncertainty associated with the risk assessment of these chemicals or other 

chemicals assessed in the future by the IRIS program.
CAUSE NO. 05-15-01493-CV

MICHAEL GAY COOK, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

APPELLANT

VS. 

CAROLINE D. COOK, 

APPELLEE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REDUCE SUPERSEDEAS BOND 

COMES NOW, Michael Gay Cook, Defendant in the above styled cause of action, which he, as appellant, 

has appealed to the 5th District Court of Appeals, and files this motion pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 24 

requesting the supersedeas bond be reduced, and would show unto this honorable Court the following 

matters to wit:

1. Appellant is retired and has a set income of $1,048 per month. The Trial Court set the superedeas 

bond at $1800. This appeal rises from a forcible entry and detainer action over an oral lease agreement 

with a monthly rental of $300 per month paid in bimonthly installments of $150 each. 

2. The amount of the supersedeas bond will cause the Appellant substantial economic harm. The 

Appellate Court has the power to review the excessiveness of the amount of a supersedeas bond. See In 

re: It’s The Berry’s. LLC, 12-06-00298-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 9146 (Tex App-Tyler, October 25, 

2006). 

3. The Texas Supreme Court has established in Marshall v. Housing Authority of City of San Antonio, 

198 SW3rd 782 (Tex 2006) that a tenant is not required to post a supersedeas bond in order to appeal a 

judgment of possession in an eviction case. 

WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that this motion be set for hearing and that upon hearing the 

Appellate Court will issue an order lowering the amount of the supersedeas bond to an amount that will not 

subject the Appellant to substantial economic harm.

ACCEPTED

05-15-01493-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

12/10/2015 9:11:10 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/10/2015 9:11:10 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
Respectfully submitted this the 10th day of December, 2015.

Kerry L. Prisock

Kerry L. Prisock

State Bar Number 24082005

Post Office Box 1051

Rockwall, Texas 75087

Telephone: 214-632-3823

Facsimile: 469-252-7496

kprisocklegal@sbcglobal.net

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served upon opposing counsel by 

electronic means.

Kerry L. Prisock

Kerry L. Prisock

State Bar Number 24082005

Post Office Box 1051

Rockwall, Texas 75087

Telephone: 214-632-3823

Facsimile: 469-252-7496

kprisocklegal@sbcglobal.net

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-4813

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM161AD

A300-57-6017, R03 --- 11/19/97

A300-57-6017, R01 --- 7/25/94

A300-57-6017 --- 11/22/93

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit
10.41


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


AMENDED AND RESTATED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
PLAN


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN (this “First
Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 13th day of August,
2007, by STATION CASINOS, INC.,
a Nevada corporation, with its principal offices located at 10973 W. Summerlin
Centre Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada  89135 (the “Company “).


 


WHEREAS, the Company adopted a
Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2001 (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company now desires to
amend the Plan as provided herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of August 13,
2007, the Plan is amended as follows:


 


1.             Section 2(d) of
the Plan is hereby amended in full to read as follows:


 


                “(d)         “Change
in Control” means and shall be deemed to have occurred if (i) prior to
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by that certain Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of February 23, 2007 and amended as of May 4,
2007, among the Company, Fertitta Colony Partners LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company, and FCP Acquisition Sub, a Nevada corporation (the “Merger
Agreement”), a “Change of Control”, as the same is defined in the Indenture
dated August 1, 2006, governing the Company’s $400,000,000 principal
amount of 73⁄4% Senior Notes due 2016 and as in effect on the date of the initial
issuance of such securities, occurs; and (ii) following the consummation
of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, a “Change of Control”,
as the same is defined in the Executive Employment Agreement between the
Company and Frank J. Fertitta III to be effective as of the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, in such final form as shall
be approved by the Board, occurs.  For
avoidance of doubt, none of the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement shall constitute a “Change in Control” for purposes of the foregoing
definition or for any other purposes under the Plan.”


 


2.             Capitalized terms not otherwise
defined in this First Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.


 


3.             Except as expressly amended by this
First Amendment, all other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain
unaltered, are hereby reaffirmed, and shall continue in full force and effect.


 


4.             This First Amendment may be
executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of
which shall constitute one and the same document, with the same effect as if
all parties had signed on the same page.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 


 

















 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed
this First Amendment effective as of the date first written above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  STATION CASINOS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Thomas M. Friel

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Thomas
  M. Friel

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Executive
  Vice President, Chief

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Accounting
  Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 10.5.3


 


Stratum Holdings, Inc.


Three Riverway, Suite 1500


Houston, Texas  77056


 


March 3, 2008


 


Mr. Kenneth
L. Thomas


c/o
Stratum Holdings, Inc.


Three
Riverway, Suite 1500


Houston,
Texas  77056


 


Re:          Stay Bonus Arrangement


 


Dear
Mr. Thomas:


 


As you are aware, pursuant to resolutions adopted at a special meeting
of the Board of Directors of Stratum Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), held on March 3, 2008, the Board of Directors of the
Company has approved the payment of a stay bonus to you in the amount of
$70,000.  The Company is paying such
amount to you in consideration for services you rendered to the Company in
connection with the sale of Petroleum Engineers, Inc., a Louisiana
corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and for consulting
services to be rendered by you to the Company after the closing of such
transaction.  The Company will arrange
for payment of such amount to be made to you upon your completion of your
service to the Company, which is scheduled to occur on or about March 31,
2008.


 


Please
acknowledge your receipt of this letter and your agreement with the above terms
by signing your name in the space provided below.


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/
  Richard A. Piske, III

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Richard
  A. Piske, III

  
	
   

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer

  



 


	
  Accepted
  and Agreed:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Kenneth L. Thomas

  	
   

  
	
  Kenneth
  L. Thomas
Appellant claimed that he had good cause if he "pass fed] the 

deadline by a couple of days" because he was in administrative 

segregation, did not have physical access to the law library, and had to 

rely on law clerks to come to his unit. Appellant failed to demonstrate 

cause for the delay. Appellant failed to state how long he was in 

administrative segregation or to demonstrate that the prison failed to 

provide him adequate means of accessing legal research materials or the 

mail. Moreover, appellant could not have demonstrated undue prejudice 

because his claims were not supported by specific factual allegations that, 

even if true and not repelled by the record, would have entitled him to 

relief See Hargrove IT. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

2The district court improperly reached the merits of appellant's 

claims. See State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Riker), 121 Nev. 225, 

231, 112 P.3d 1070, 1074 (2005) ("Application of the statutory 

procedural default rules to post-conviction habeas petitions is 

mandatory."). We nevertheless affirm the district court's decision for the 

reasons stated above. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 

341 (1970) (holding that a correct result will not be reversed simply 

because it is based on the wrong reason). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge 

Roger Raphael Brown 

Attorney GenerallCarson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A
Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to
18 United States Code s. 1350

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Manulife Financial Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 19, 2015



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|/s/ Donald A. Guloien                                               
|Name: Donald A. Guloien Title: President and
Chief Executive Officer