alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





/s/
      Ron RuskowskyRon
      Ruskowsky
                        Chief
      Executive Officer
                        August
      10, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Date & Time:

Tuesday, April 28, 2009, and Wednesday, April 29, 2009 at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

* * * * *

# Person to Contact for Information:

                        Judith Ingram, Press Officer,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 694-1220.                    

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-9473 Filed 4-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
J uly 22, 2014

Lucas Parmer

P.O. Box 800369 LaGrange, GA 30240

Dear Mr. Parmer :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption , and explains why we cannot process your request for exemption, from § § 61

. 160(c) (2) and 61.160(c)(3) of Title 1 4, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

You entered a petition for exemption on March 2 8, 2014

, into the public docket (No. FAA

2014

- 0207 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The relief that you are seeking is for an eligibility requirement for the restricted privileges airline transport pilot ( R

ATP) certificate

. If an individual were granted the relief that you have requested, further relief

from additional requirements listed in § 61.160(c) wou ld be needed to exercise that relief.

Specifically, §§ 61.160(c)(1) requires an applicant for an R

- ATP certificate to hold an Associate’s degree with an aviation major from an institution of higher education that has

been issued a letter of authorization (LOA) by the FAA under § 61.169 (b)

. Under § 61.169(b), an institution of higher education must comply with the LOA and may not certify a graduate unless it determines that the graduate meets the requirements of § 61.160.

Additionally, under § 61.160(c)( 4), a n applicant for a n R

- ATP certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating

, or R

- ATP certificate obtained concurrently with an airplane type rating “must present an official transcript and certifying document from an institution of higher education that holds a letter of authorization from the Administrator under § 61.169.”

The relief that you have requested w ould not permit an institution of higher education to

deviate from the requirements prescribed in § 61.169 or the conditions listed in the letter of

authorization.

In summary, t he re lief for which you are petitioning the FAA is insufficient for the outcome you are seeking since it w ould not provide the appropriate relief for an individual to be eligible for an R

- ATP in accordance wit h § 61.160 (b)

.

The FAA will only consider the relief that you have requested from an institution of higher

education , as defined in § 61.1, since the authority to certify graduates for an ATP certificate under the academic and aeronautical experience re quirements in § 61.160 may be satisfied only by the institution’s determination of eligibility

. Therefore, the FAA will not process your2

request for further consideration of an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.160(c)(2) and 61.160(c)(3)

.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions, you may call Carl N. Johnson, Acting Deputy Division Manager (AFS

- 801), General Aviation and Commercial Division, Flight Sta ndards Service (202) 385

- 9600

.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40627

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FREDIC RAMOS-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-520-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Fredic Ramos-Gonzalez

raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 

F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 533 (2015). In MartinezLugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. 

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior felony conviction of a drug trafficking offense is 

warranted regardless whether the prior conviction required proof of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40627 Document: 00513383203 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-40627

2

remuneration or commercial activity. Accordingly, the motion for summary 

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40627 Document: 00513383203 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3242 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3242

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare 
   beneficiaries coordinated care and greater choice with regard to 
            accessing hearing health services and benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide Medicare 
   beneficiaries coordinated care and greater choice with regard to 
            accessing hearing health services and benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Hearing Health Care 
Enhancement Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. ENABLING MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES TO HAVE THEIR CHOICE OF 
              QUALIFIED HEARING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.

    Section 1861(ll)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395x(ll)(3)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``, without regard to any requirement that the individual 
receiving the audiology services be under the care of (or referred by) 
a physician or other health care practitioner or that such services are 
provided under the supervision of a physician or other health care 
practitioner''.

SEC. 3. INCLUSION OF AUDIOLOGY SERVICES AS MEDICAL SERVICES UNDER 
              MEDICARE PART B; PAYMENT FOR SUCH SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (EE), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (FF), by inserting ``and'' at the end; 
        and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(GG) audiology services (as defined in subsection 
        (ll)(3));''.
    (b) Payment Under the Physician Fee Schedule.--Section 1848(j)(3) 
of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting 
``(2)(GG),'' before ``(3),''.

SEC. 4. CONSTRUCTION; EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) Construction.--Nothing in the amendments made by this Act shall 
be construed to expand the scope of audiology services for which 
payment may be made under title XVIII of the Social Security Act on 
December 31, 2012.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall take 
effect with respect to services furnished on or after January 1, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LEROME EUGENE HOWARD, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4348

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 9, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Vivian Corvo, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001096594
<NAME>                        Natural Solutions Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jul-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Apr-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         126,252
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    671,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               939,367
<PP&E>                                         93,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,629,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,301,192
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       20,297
<OTHER-SE>                                     (678,442)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,629,750
<SALES>                                        256,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,037
<CGS>                                          318,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  825,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (20,515)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (590,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (590,255)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
SunWise Program Student Survey

Opt-Out Form

Your child is being asked to take part in two brief surveys given by his/her teacher before and after your 

child participates in the SunWise Program. These simple, 10-minute questionnaires elicit basic 

information on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of children relating to sun exposure.

Teachers who volunteer to participate will provide students with a double-sided, one-page anonymous 

survey. After students complete the survey in the spring, teachers will lead SunWise lessons. Based on 

SunWise’s recommendations, teachers will administer the second survey about one year later to see if 

changes in sun protection have been made. Student survey responses are voluntary and anonymous. 

Children may skip questions they do not wish to answer; however, we hope that they will answer as many

questions as they can. The results from the student surveys are used to gauge program effectiveness 

and also to help guide materials development.

The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 2060-0439. Children's responses are 

protected from disclosure by federal statute (PL 107-279 Title I, Part C, Sec. 183). All responses may be 

used only for statistical purposes and may not be disclosed or used in identifiable form for any other 

purpose, unless otherwise compelled by law. Data from multiple individuals will be combined to produce 

statistical reports. 

If you have any questions or concerns about the protection of the information you provide or your child’s

rights in this survey, please contact Rob Landolfi at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at 202-

343-9161 or landolfi.robert@epa.gov.

OPT-OUT AGREEMENT

I have read the letter and the information above.

・ I DO NOT consent to my child’s participation in the SunWise Program survey.

CHILD’S NAME: 

 First and last name

Sign your name:

 Signature of parent/guardian Date

Print your name:

 First Middle Last

NOTE: If you will allow your child to participate in the study, you do not need to return this form. If you 

do not want your child to take part in this study, please complete, sign, and return this form in the 

enclosed envelope to your child’s school.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Steve Bolton, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Bryan Markert, Secretary and Treasurer of Carolyn River Projects Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Carolyn River Projects Ltd. for the period ended May 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Carolyn River Projects Ltd. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  August 29, 2007

/s/ Steve Bolton

Steve Bolton 

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Bryan Markert

Bryan Markert

Secretary and Treasurer 

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Carolyn River Projects Ltd. and will be retained by Carolyn River Projects Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

CW1374870.1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6042** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. GEORGE MCBRIDE, a/k/a Benzo , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville
. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 1:00

- cr - 00069

- MR

- 3 )

Submitted : April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. George McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: George McBride seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 225 3(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standa rd by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McBride has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
exh10-1.htm




Exhibit 10.1







THIS AMENDED AGREEMENT dated as of the 24th day of OCTOBER, 2011

















BETWEEN:            SIDNEY CHAN (herein called the "Lender")


of 23H Block III Riviera Garden


Tsuen Wan, New Territories


Hong Kong







AND:                       ALR TECHNOLOGIES INC. (herein called the "Company")


A Nevada corporation with its registered office at


3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 1900,


Atlanta, Georgia.

















WITNESSES THAT WHEREAS:








	
A.  

	
The Lender and the Company entered into an agreement on March 6, 2011 (the “Credit Agreement”) whereby the Lender agreed to lend to the Company up to $2,500,000 for the purpose of funding the payments to be made under a contemplated agreement with a sales and marketing agent in connection with the commercialization of the Company’s Health e-Connect compliance marketing system.













	
B.  

	
On June 1, 2011, the Company entered into an Agreement with Mantra Health Solutions Inc. (the “Mantra Agreement”) whereby Mantra agreed to act as the sales and marketing agent for the Company and thereafter the Company drew down amounts under the Credit Agreement, which included amounts paid to Mantra under the Mantra Agreement;













	
C.  

	
On September 15, 2011, the Mantra Agreement was cancelled and the Company proposed to conduct its sales and marketing activities using its own sales team; and













	
D.  

	
The Company and the Lender have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to provide that the undrawn proceeds of the loan may be used for the Company’s general corporate purposes, including funding the costs of sales and marketing activities.




































  





  











  













NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:








	
1.

	
The provisions of subsection 4(a) of the Credit Agreement are hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:












“4(a)  The Company shall use the amounts drawn down for its general corporate purposes and will, on request, provide the Lender, prior to any draw down, with particulars of the proposed use of the funds to be drawn down.”








	
2.

	
Except as amended by this Agreement, all other terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement shall remain in force and unaltered.

















IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT the 24th day of October, 2011













	
SIDNEY CHAN

	
ALR TECHNOLOGIES INC.


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
SIDNEY CHAN

	
Per:

	
LAWRENCE WEINSTEIN   10/24/11


	  	  	  
	  	
Name:

	
Lawrence Weinstein


	  	  	  
	  	
Title:

	
President
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2962 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2962

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Dragasantol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Dragasantol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRAGASANTOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      6-Methyl-2-(4-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        methyl-3-                                                          31/2015.......
                        cyclohexen-1-yl)-
                        5-hepten-2-ol
                        (CAS No. 515-69-
                        5) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2906.19.5000)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```