alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1.htm

Exhibit 10.1

    SHARE TRANSFER
AGREEMENT

    


    This
Agreement dated the 7th day of
March, 2008

    


    BETWEEN:

    Adam R. Cegielski

    


    (hereinafter referred to as the
“Transferor”)

    


    AND:

    Gregory Leigh Lyons

    


    (hereinafter referred to as the
“Transferee)

    


    


    THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH THAT
in consideration of the purchase price of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000) in US
funds and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, and in reliance on the agreements, representations
and warranties of the Transferor, the Transferee hereby agrees to purchase Forty
Million (40,000,000) shares (the “Shares”) of Goldmountain Exploration
Corporation (the “Company”) from the Transferor free and clear of all liens,
charges and encumbrances.

    


    The
Transferee represents and warrants to the Transferor that:

    


    (1)         the
Transferee is acquiring the Shares for his own account for investment purposes;
and

    


    
      	
              (2)

            	
              the
      Transferee possesses the financial and business experience to make an
      informed decision to acquire the Shares, and has had access to all
      information relating to the Company and its business operations which
      would be necessary to make an informed decision to purchase the
      Shares.

            


    

     

    The
Transferor represents and warrants to the Transferee that:

    


    
      	
              (1)

            	
              the
      Transferor is not an affiliate of the Corporation and did not acquire the
      Shares from an affiliate of the Corporation;
and

            


    

    


    
      	
              (2)

            	
              the
      Transferor is the beneficial owner of the Shares and has the right to
      dispose of them in the manner contemplated by this
    agreement.

            


    

    


    This
Agreement may be executed in one or more counter-parts, each which so executed,
whether in original or facsimile form, shall constitute one and the same
agreement and be considered an original.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed the Agreement effective as of the date of this
Agreement.

    


    


    


    

      
        	
                Adam
      R. Cegielski

              	 
      	
                Gregory
      Leigh Lyons

              
	/s/
      Adam R. Cegielski 	 	/s/
      Gregory Leigh Lyons
|    |  |                                        |  |                  
|--- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|    |  |                                        |  |                  
|    |  |                                       
|E14 |  | SHELL ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F 2013 |  | REPORTS.SHELL.COM



|            
|------------
|EXHIBIT 99.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-177588, 333-177588-01) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-126715, 333-141397, 333-171206 and 333-192821) of the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust of our report dated March 12, 2014,
relating to the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust Financial Statements, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP
|                                 
|PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP    
|Jersey, Channel Islands          
|March 12, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

I. DEAN FULTON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 106 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7594** 

MARVIN W. MILLSAPS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. OLIVER WASHINGTON , Respondent

- Appellee
.

**No. 15**  **- 7601** 

MARVIN W. MILLSAPS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. OLIVER WASHINGTON , Respondent

- Appellee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 5:15

- cv - 00113

- FDW; 5:15

- cv - 00114

- FDW )

Submitted : February 2 5 , 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS , Senior Circuit Judge
.2 Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Marvin W. Millsaps, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Marvin W. Millsaps seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition s . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C
. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Sl ack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and tha t the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Millsaps has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of a ppealability and dismiss the appeal s . We deny Millsaps’ motion to supplement and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately4 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional proc ess. DISMISSE D
##### 



VOLUME SERVICES AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC.
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Volume Services
America Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I , Lawrence E. Honig, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Lawrence E. Honig
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3147 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain eyelash curlers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain eyelash curlers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN EYELASH CURLERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Eyelash curlers, nonthermic 

and nonornamental (provided 

for in subheading 

9615.90.20) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3147 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0001086775
<NAME>                 Volume Services America, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-28-1999
<CASH>                                         12,281
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,348
<INVENTORY>                                    10,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               50,789
<PP&E>                                         95,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                278,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49,849
<BONDS>                                       223,972
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,386)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  278,621
<SALES>                                       431,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              431,453
<CGS>                                         342,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 342,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             23,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,549)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   873
<CHANGES>                                         256
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,648)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0





</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2017

NO. 03-15-00786-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Christopher Reid Dewbre, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND BOURLAND 

REVERSED AND REMANDED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on December 2, 2015. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s order and remands the case for 

further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Because appellee is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Extension of Employment Agreement - DeWitt


 Exhibit 10.8 
 Mutual Consent to Extend Employment Term 
 In connection with that certain Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement between Kensey Nash Corporation and Todd M. DeWitt, entered into as of January 1, 2009, and as amended through the date hereof (the “Agreement”), the parties thereto (1) acknowledge that the term
of the Agreement will automatically expire on January 1, 2012, if not extended, and (2) mutually agree to extend the term of the Agreement to January 1, 2013, pursuant to Section 3(a) of the Agreement. Except to the extent
necessary to give effect to the foregoing extension, the Agreement will otherwise remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as parties to the Agreement, have caused this Mutual Consent to be executed as of the 21st day of October, 2011. This Mutual Consent may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and
when taken together shall constitute one agreement. 
  

									
	Executive	 		 	Kensey Nash Corporation
					
	 /s/ Todd M. DeWitt
	 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Douglas G. Evans, P.E.

	Todd M. DeWitt	 		 		 	Name:	 	Douglas G. Evans, P.E.
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Chief Operating Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2740 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2740

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of alkene 
    polymers with maleic anhydride, 2-(1-piperazinyl) ethylimides, 
        diisononyl phthalate and bis(1-methylethyl)-naphthalene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of alkene 
    polymers with maleic anhydride, 2-(1-piperazinyl) ethylimides, 
        diisononyl phthalate and bis(1-methylethyl)-naphthalene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF ALKENE POLYMERS WITH MALEIC ANHYDRIDE, 2-(1-
              PIPERAZINYL) ETHYLIMIDES, DIISONONYL PHTHALATE AND BIS(1-
              METHYLETHYL)-NAPHTHALENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of alkene polymers 
with maleic anhydride, 2-(1-piperazinyl) ethylimides, diisononyl 
phthalate and bis(1-methylethyl)-naphthalene) is amended by striking 
the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3098 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mucochloric acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mucochloric 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MUCOCHLORIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.05 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 mucochloric acid) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3098 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Patricia Milano, Appellant

No. 06-23-00246-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Titus County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CR19070). Panel consists of Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

van Cleef. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the bill of 

costs. Therefore, we strike “TPRF2 Time Payment Reimb Fee $15.00” from the bill of costs and 

reduce the reimbursement in the bill of costs from $72.00 to $57.00. We affirm the judgment of 

the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Patricia Milano, has adequately indicated her inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 14, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk May 1, 2013

t0424 

# Order

May 1, 2013

146721

In re Estate of TERRI A. SHOLBERG

_________________________________________

DIANE K. SHOLBERG, as Personal

Representative for the Estate of Terri A.

Sholberg,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146721

COA: 307308

Emmet CC: 10

- 002711

- NI

ROBERT TRUMAN and MARILYN TRUMAN,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

DANIEL TRUMAN,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Scott Kamsler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.

Date: August 7, 2007



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    J. SCOTT KAMSLER                          
|J. Scott Kamsler                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas F. Cooke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.





| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Thomas Cooke       
| | Name:  | Thomas Cooke           
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | November 23, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WALTER BERNARD MORTON, JR., Plaintiff ,

v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al. , Defendants

. Civil Action No. 17-1112 (RDM)

ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Dkt. 24, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dis miss or, in the alternative, to Transfer, Dkt. 14, is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 13, is DENIED ; and it
is further
ORDERED that the remainder of Plainti ff’s complaint is dismissed on th e Court’s own
motion for failure to state a claim; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court sh all terminate this case.2 This Order constitutes the final judgment of the Court within t he meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a).
SO ORDERED

.
/s/ Randolph D. Moss RANDOLPH D. MOSS United States District Judge

Date: July 6, 2018
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 21, 2024

NO. 03-23-00354-CV

Paul Johnson, Appellant

v.

Bastrop Central Appraisal District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order declaring appellant a vexatious litigant signed by the trial court 

on May 17, 2023. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that

there was reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s order

declaring appellant a vexatious litigant and requiring him to furnish security and remands the 

case to the trial court for further proceedings. Appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 21, 2024

NO. 03-23-00404-CV

Paul Johnson, Appellant

v.

Bastrop Central Appraisal District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order dismissing with prejudice appellant’s lawsuit signed by the trial 

court on June 21, 2023. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds 

that there was reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s order

dismissing appellant’s lawsuit for failure to furnish security and remands the case to the trial 

court for further proceedings. Appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and in the court below.
Order entered March 1 7 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00277 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 002 85 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 002 86 - CR UMAIR AHMAE KHAN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A p pellee On Appeal from the 199th Judi cial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 199 - 80965 - 2018 , 199 - 8 1674 - 2018 & 199 - 83132 - 2018 O RDER We REINSTATE th ese appeals. We abated for a hearing on counsel. On March 10, 2020, the Court wa s infor med appellant hired James P. Whalen as retained counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to list James P . Whalen as counsel for appel la nt. All future correspondence should be sent to Mr. Whalen at the address listed in our records. The appellate recor d is due A pril 13, 2020.We DIRECT t he Cl erk to s en d copies o f this order to the Honorable Angela

Tucker , Presiding Judg e, 19 9 th Judicial District Court; Lynne Finley , Collin County District Clerk ; LaTresta Ginyard , offici al court reporter , 19 9 th Judicial Distri ct Court ; J ames P. Whalen; and the Collin Count y District Attorney ’ s Office

. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE