alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.12
  
 Re:
    
    Employment of Jean W. Marstiller as Senior Vice President, Administrative Services by
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  st
 Compensation.




---



##### 



Additional Payments
 Employment at Will
 Confidentiality
 Discoveries and Improvements




---



##### 



Publication
 Litigation
 Competition




---



##### 



Conflicting Contracts
 Solicitation
   Return of Documents
 Remedies
 Debarment




---



##### 



Notice
 Waiver
 Entire Agreement
 Governance
 Enforceability
 Survival
  Sincerely yours,CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC./s/ A.J. KazimiBy: A.J. KazimiChief Executive OfficerAccepted as to all terms and conditionsas of the 9th of March, 2011:/s/ Jean W. Marstiller

          Jean W. Marstiller
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors and Stockholders of HotJobs.com, Ltd.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 333-86409) of HotJobs.com, Ltd. of our report dated February 7,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HotJobs.com, Ltd. as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the period from February 20, 1997 (inception)
to December 31, 1997, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                        /s/ KPMG LLP



New York, New York
March 22, 2000
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NovaMed, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas S. Hall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/ THOMAS S. HALL Thomas S. Hall Chief Executive OfficerMarch 16, 2010


In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NovaMed, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott T. Macomber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

/s/ SCOTT T. MACOMBER Scott T. Macomber Chief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2010


This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
# C_2004135EN.01000101.xml

| 13.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 April 2004

appointing members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency

(2004/C 135/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second and third paragraphs of Article 54 thereof,

Having regard to Article X of the Statutes of the Euratom Supply Agency (1), as last amended by Decision 95/1/EC, Euratom, ECSC of 1 January 1995 (2),

1

2

Having regard to the Council Decision of 22 September 2003 appointing the members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency (3),

3

Having regard to the opinion of the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Several members' seats on the aforementioned Committee have become vacant following the appointments made by the Council in its Decision of 22 September 2003. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Several members' seats on the aforementioned Committee have become vacant following the appointments made by the Council in its Decision of 22 September 2003.

| (2) | Those vacancies should be filled. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Those vacancies should be filled.

| (3) | Having regard to the nominations submitted by the Italian Government on 15 January 2004, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Having regard to the nominations submitted by the Italian Government on 15 January 2004,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Mr Raffaele DI SAPIA, Mr Angelo PAPA, Mr Lamberto MATEOCCI and Mr Roberto MUSSAPI are hereby appointed members of the Advisory Committee of the Euratom Supply Agency for the remainder of the Committee's term of office, i.e. until 28 March 2005.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2004.

For the Council

The President

M. McDOWELL

---

(1)  OJ 27, 6.12.1958, p. 534/58.

1

(2)  OJ L 1, 1.1.1995, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ C 232, 27.9.2003, p. 1.

3

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3028 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on D-Mannose. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on D-Mannose. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. D-MANNOSE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.19 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 D-Mannose) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1662

In Re: JOHN D. GOELZ, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Praecipe. (CA-99-413-3-MU) Submitted: June 27, 2000 Decided: July 10, 2000 Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John D. Goelz, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The district court denied Goelz’s motion to remand. See Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis , 519 U.S. 61, 74 (1996) (by timely filing motion for remand, litigant “did all that was required to preserve his objection to remand”). 2 PER CURIAM: John D. Goelz brought this action seeking a writ of praecipe, an injunction, and a restraining order barring the district court from proceeding in his contract action that had been removed tofederal court from state court. Essentially, Goelz is seeking mandamus relief. As explained in the order denying Goelz’s earlier mandamus petition challenging the district court’s jurisdiction over his contract case, mandamus relief is not available because Goelz has another remedy, namely to appeal any unfavorable final district court decision. * We therefore deny relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 164 ) IV-E-3

7 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56

PM Sheet 164 of 242P. 2

j^° 8 % %«*>* ' -ryn- -

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

### MA YI2 »98 8
MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Meeting wit h Chrysle r on Onboar d Hardwar e

n F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r %/jL^ / #-*-J^___---

- ndard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc hf ^ '' FRO M Joh

St a lopme i Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 On Apri l 26 , 198 8 I me t wit hrepresentative s o f Chrysle r Corporatio n a t Chrysler' s reques t t o provid e the mthe opportunit yt o as k followu p questions . A

n attendanc e lis t i s attached . I reviewe d i n detai l al l o f the hardwar e change s whic hwe mad e a s wer e outline d i n the briefing t o MVMA . Th e Chrysle r representative s ha d a numbe r o f question s abou t the specific s o f the valv e modification s whic hwer e mad e an d the fillnec k restriction s w e tested . W e als o wen t t o th e tes t cel l an d examine d the tes t hardwar e an d some o f th

e individua l components . Attachmen t

( • (•P. 3

Meeting wit hChrysle r on Onboar d Hardwar e Name Representative s Phon e Joh n Anderso n EP A668-449 6 Ji mFurlong Chrysle r 956-466 6 Ric k Chauvi n Chrysle r 956-083 1 Gar yDawso n Chrysle r 956-477 4 Keit hKerb

yChrysle r 956-173 4 Dav e Brook s Chrysle r 956-129 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7367
RUSSELL JAMES CAMPBELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-509-H) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Russell James Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. Corcoran , No. CA96-509-H (D. Md. Aug. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,584]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 13, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Tyco Electronics Corporation, Jonestown, Pennsylvania.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-8939 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
First Amendment to the 1998 State Auto Agents Stock Option Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 STATE AUTO FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 1998 STATE AUTO AGENTS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 (Amended and Restated as of May 1, 1999) 
 The State Auto
Financial Corporation 1998 State Auto Agents’ Stock Option Plan, amended and restated as of May 1, 1999 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended in the following particulars: 
  

	§1.	Definitions  

 All capitalized terms used in this
amendment which are not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Plan. 
  

	§2.	No Stock Option Repricing without Shareholder Approval 

 The Option Price of any Stock Options granted under the Plan shall not be changed or modified after the time such Stock Options have been granted unless such change or modification is made with a the prior approval of the Company’s
shareholders. 
  

	§3.	Effective Date; Construction 

 The effective date of
this amendment is March 7, 2008, and this amendment shall be deemed to be a part of the Plan as of such date. In the event of any inconsistencies between the provisions of the Plan and this amendment, the provisions of this amendment shall
control. Except as modified by this amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect without change.
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge

for the District of Nebraska.

___________

No. 96-1799

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Nebraska.

David Barrett, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: November 29, 1996

 Filed: December 6, 1996 ___________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

David Barrett challenges the 3-year sentence of probation

imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to using a

telephone to facilitate the distribution of methamphetamine, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). Counsel filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and was granted leave to

withdraw. This court granted Barrett leave to file a pro se

supplemental brief, which he has not done. We affirm.

In his Anders brief, counsel relates that Barrett believes he

was entrapped by a government witness and had the government told

him of the witness's "informant" status, he would not have pleaded

guilty, but would have gone to trial and presented an entrapment

defense. We conclude Barrett waived any entrapment defense by
-2-

pleading guilty. See Peoples v. United States, 412 F.2d 5, 7 (8th

Cir. 1969); United States v. Riles, 928 F.2d 339, 342 (10th Cir.

1991); United States v. Sarmiento, 786 F.2d 665, 668 (5th Cir.

1986). Regardless, we do not believe Barrett could have prevailed

on such a defense, because the evidence reflects he was predisposed

to purchase methamphetamine from, and initiated contact with, the

witness. See United States v. Gullickson, 982 F.2d 1231, 1235 (8th

Cir. 1993) (to prove entrapment defense, defendant must show he was

not predisposed to commit crime and government induced him to

commit crime).

Having carefully reviewed the record, we have found no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 2993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area (SRA) Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA Forest Service

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory Council meetings 
will convene in Stayton, Oregon on Wednesday, February 11, 2009. These 
meetings are scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m., and will conclude at 
approximately 8:30 p.m. Meetings will be held in the South Room of the 
Stayton Community Center located on 400 West Virginia Street in 
Stayton, Oregon.
    The Opal Creek Wilderness and Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Act 
of 1996 (Opal Creek Act) (Pub. L. 104-208) directed the Secretary of 
Agriculture to establish the Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area Advisory 
Council. The Advisory Council is comprised of thirteen members 
representing state, county and city governments, and representatives of 
various organizations, which include mining industry, environmental 
organizations, inholders in Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area, economic 
development, Indian tribes, adjacent landowners and recreation 
interests. The council provides advice to the Secretary of Agriculture 
on preparation of a comprehensive Opal Creek Management Plan for the 
SRA, and consults on a periodic and regular basis on the management of 
the area. Tentative agenda items include: Forest Service updates and 
future projects.
    A direct public comment period is tentatively scheduled to begin at 
8 p.m. Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged, particularly if the material 
cannot be presented within the time limits of the comment period. 
Written comments may be submitted prior to scheduled meetings by 
sending them to Designated Federal Official Paul Matter at the address 
given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information regarding this 
meeting, contact Designated Federal Official Paul Matter; Willamette 
National Forest, Detroit Ranger District, HC 73 Box 320, Mill City, OR 
97360; (503) 854-3366.

    Dated: January 9, 2009.
Dallas J. Emch,
Forest Supervisor.
 [FR Doc. E9-876 Filed 1-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roubik Gregorian certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.

Date: February 7, 2007



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Roubik Gregorian                           
|Roubik Gregorian                               
|Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,720,794
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,731,051
<PP&E>                                            89,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                    10,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,923,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             50,743
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         167,469
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,705,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,923,761
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   7,107
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 495,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (488,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (488,472)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (488,472)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.03)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference into Registration Statements Nos. 333-190509, 333-10232 and 333-11320 on Form F-3 of our report dated 7 March 2014, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Santander UK plc, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F ofSantander UK plc for the year ended 31 December 2013, and to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in such Annual Report on Form 20-F. 

*DELOITTE LLP*

London, England 

7 March 2014
Exhibit 99.2
------------




               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                   OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoolSavings,
Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David B. Arney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of the Company.



                            By:   /s/  David B. Arney
                                  ------------------------------
                                  David B. Arney
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  March 24, 2003
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Daniel G. Welch, Chief Executive Officer of InterMune, Inc. (the“Company”), and John C. Hodgman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.**In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 11th day of March, 2008.         /s/ Daniel G. Welch /s/ John C. Hodgman           Daniel G. Welch John C. Hodgman    Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofInterMune, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.