alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2733 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2733

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on aqueous emulsion of a 
 modified aliphatic amine mixture of: decanedioic acid, compounds with 
  1,3- benzene-dimethanamine-bisphenol A-bisphenol A diglycidyl ether-
      diethylenetriamine glycidyl phenyl ether reaction product- 
  epichlorohydrinformaldehyde- propylene oxide- triethylenetetramine 
                                polymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on aqueous emulsion of a 
 modified aliphatic amine mixture of: decanedioic acid, compounds with 
  1,3- benzene-dimethanamine-bisphenol A-bisphenol A diglycidyl ether-
      diethylenetriamine glycidyl phenyl ether reaction product- 
  epichlorohydrinformaldehyde- propylene oxide- triethylenetetramine 
                                polymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AQUEOUS EMULSION OF A MODIFIED ALIPHATIC AMINE MIXTURE OF: 
              DECANEDIOIC ACID, COMPOUNDS WITH 1,3- BENZENE-
              DIMETHANAMINE-BISPHENOL A-BISPHENOL A DIGLYCIDYL ETHER-
              DIETHYLENETRIAMINE GLYCIDYL PHENYL ETHER REACTION 
              PRODUCT- EPICHLOROHYDRINFORMALDEHYDE- PROPYLENE OXIDE- 
              TRIETHYLENETETRAMINE POLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to aqueous emulsion of a 
modified aliphatic amine mixture of: decanedioic acid, compounds with 
1,3- benzene-dimethanamine-bisphenol A-bisphenol A diglycidyl ether-
diethylenetriamine glycidyl phenyl ether reaction product- 
epichlorohydrinformaldehyde- propylene oxide- triethylenetetramine 
polymer) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,875          1,828
<SECURITIES>                                        0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,128         29,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                   10,347         12,714
<INVENTORY>                                     1,490          3,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,386         24,142
<PP&E>                                         13,441         22,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,548          6,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 62,679         88,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           7,166         12,162
<BONDS>                                             0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          16,551              0
<PREFERRED>                                         0              0
<COMMON>                                           28            242
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,805         74,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   62,679         88,252
<SALES>                                        12,472         26,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               63,729        102,588
<CGS>                                           9,552         17,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  58,986         96,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,373          3,685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,273          1,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,370          2,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,664          1,808
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,706            874
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0              0
<CHANGES>                                           0              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,706            874
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .07            .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .06          (.06)



</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1111 

CA 12-00432 

PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

RUSTIN R. HOWARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BIOWORKS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

 

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (ANDREW J. RYAN OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LECLAIR KORONA GIORDANO COLE LLP, ROCHESTER (STEVEN E. COLE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme

Court, Ontario County (Craig J. Doran, A.J.), entered November 21,

2011 in a breach of contract action. The order and judgment granted

plaintiff money damages of $1 and directed defendant to reflect a

noninterest bearing monetary obligation to plaintiff of $19,800 on its

balance sheet until paid. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from

is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the award of damages of

$1 and ordering that judgment be entered for plaintiff in the amount

of $19,800, together with interest commencing December 22, 2005, and

as modified the order and judgment is affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this breach of contract action

alleging that defendant failed to pay him deferred compensation in the

amount of $19,800 for prior services that he performed in accordance

with the parties’ written agreement. We determined on a prior appeal

that the record established as a matter of law that there was an

anticipatory repudiation of the agreement by defendant and that

“Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiff’s motion for

summary judgment on liability only, inasmuch as there is an issue of

fact with respect to the amount of damages” (Howard v BioWorks, Inc.,

83 AD3d 1588, 1588). Thereafter, the court conducted a nonjury trial

on damages. Plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment that, inter

alia, awarded him nominal damages in the amount of one dollar. 

We reject plaintiff’s contention that our prior decision is the

law of the case with respect to the amount of damages resulting from

defendant’s breach of the agreement inasmuch as we did not decide the

issue of the amount of damages to be awarded but, rather, expressly

held that an issue of fact existed in that regard (id.; see Puckett v

County of Erie [appeal No. 3], 262 AD2d 966, 967). We agree with
-2- 1111 

CA 12-00432 

plaintiff’s further contention, however, that the court erred in

awarding only nominal damages. As we stated in the prior decision,

plaintiff was “entitled to damages for total breach” (Howard, 83 AD3d

at 1589). The record establishes that defendant breached the parties’

agreement on December 22, 2005, when it informed plaintiff in an

unequivocal fashion that it never intended to pay him the amount

agreed upon in the contract. Based on that date, we conclude that

plaintiff is entitled to damages in the amount of $19,800, together

with interest commencing December 22, 2005, and we modify the order

and judgment accordingly. 

Entered: February 1, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Asia4Sale.com, Inc., (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Eric Montandon, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

February 24, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCA SOFIA CANO-JOHNSON,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-71028

Agency No. A078-278-692

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. 

Francisca Sofia Cano-Johnson, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

JUL 06 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 05-71028

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except

to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing

statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004).

We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453

F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the

petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that changed or extraordinary

circumstances excused the untimely filing of Cano-Johnson’s asylum application. 

See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 656-58

(9th Cir. 2007).

Substantial evidence supports the denial of withholding of removal because

Cano-Johnson did not demonstrate she was or would be subjected to persecution

by gang members or police on account of a protected ground. See Santos-Lemus,

542 F.3d at 746-47; Bolshakov v. INS, 133 F.3d 1279, 1281 (9th Cir. 1998)

(criminal street gang activity does not establish persecution on account of a

protected ground).

Substantial evidence supports the denial of CAT relief because CanoJohnson failed to present evidence that it is more likely than not she will be
3 05-71028

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of Honduran government officials.

See Soriano v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1162, 1167 (9th Cir. 2009).

We lack jurisdiction to review Cano-Johnson’s contention that the IJ failed

to consider the death of her mother and siblings because she did not raise this claim

before the IJ or BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Ex-10.3 Participation Agreement - Michael J. Kinca



 






	 	 	 	 	 



EXHIBIT 10.3




CHICO’S FAS, INC.

EXECUTIVE BONUS PROGRAMS




PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT





     This Participation Agreement is entered into this 3rd day of March, 2008, by and
between Chico’s FAS, Inc. (the “Company”) and Michael J. Kincaid (the “Participant”).



     WHEREAS, the Participant is a key employee of the Company selected by the Company to
participate in one or more executive bonus programs (the “Programs”); and



     WHEREAS, as a condition to receiving any bonus payable pursuant to any of the Programs, the
Participant acknowledges and agrees to be bound by the following condition:




Repayment of Bonus. If (a) within the two-year period immediately following payment
of any Bonus under any Program the Company is required to prepare an accounting
restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of
misconduct, with any then applicable financial reporting requirement under the
securities laws, and (b) the Participant is subject to automatic forfeiture under
Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or knowingly engaged in the misconduct,
was grossly negligent in engaging in the misconduct, knowingly failed to prevent the
misconduct or was grossly negligent in failing to prevent the misconduct, then the
Participant shall reimburse the Company for the amount of any such Bonus paid under
any Program.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Participation Agreement on the date first
written above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CHICO’S FAS, INC. 

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Scott A. Edmonds
 	 
	 	 	Title: Chairman, President & CEO         	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	PARTICIPANT: 

 	 
	 	            Michael J. Kincaid
 	 
	 	Participant’s Name — Please Print       	 
	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	            /s/ Michael J. Kincaid
 	 
	 	Participant’s Signature
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the quarter ended November 30,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                  1,774
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                           4,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,823
<PP&E>                                 12,870
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         19,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     294
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             18,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           19,006
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          510
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           391
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       391
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.43
        

</TABLE>
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for

the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GONG KIM,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-30021

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00025-HA-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Ancer L. Haggerty, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 12, 2012

Seattle, Washington

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,

District Judge.** 

Gong Kim pled guilty to one count of exporting munitions without a license

in violation of 22 U.S.C. § 2778. On appeal, Kim argues that the district court

FILED

JAN 18 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

should have found a base offense level of 14 because his offense “involved only

non-fully automatic small arms (rifles, handguns, or shotguns), and the number of

weapons did not exceed ten.” United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2M5.2(a)(2).

The district court correctly found a base offense level of 26 because Kim

exported gun parts, which are not “non-fully automatic small arms” within the

definition of section 2M5.2(a)(2). See United States v. Carper, 659 F.3d 923,

924–25 (9th Cir. 2011). Moreover, Kim’s offense involved enough parts to service

more than ten weapons.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2887 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2887

             To reduce temporarily the duty on Trilon MGDA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To reduce temporarily the duty on Trilon MGDA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRILON MGDA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Trisodium salt of   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        methylglycinediac                                                  31/2015.......
                        etic acid (CAS
                        No. 164462-16-2)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2922.49.8).......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 22, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9212]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION

29 CFR Part 4022


Benefits Payable in Terminated Single-Employer Plans; Interest 
Assumptions for Valuing and Paying Benefits

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation published in the 
Federal Register of April 15, 2009, a final rule informing the public 
of the interest rates and assumptions to be used under certain Pension 
Benefit Guaranty Corporation regulations. This document corrects an 
inadvertent error in that final rule.

DATES: Effective May 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine B. Klion, Attorney, 
Legislative and Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty 
Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202-326-4024. 
(TTY/TDD users may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-
877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4024.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 
published a document in the April 15, 2009, Federal Register (74 FR 
17395), informing the public of the interest rates and assumptions to 
be used under certain Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation regulations. 
This document corrects an inadvertent error in that final rule.

0
In FR Doc. E9-8674, published on April 15, 2009 (74 FR 17395), make the 
following corrections.

Appendix B to Part 4022--[Corrected]

0
1. On page 17396, in the table for Appendix B to Part 4022, under 
``Immediate annuity rate (percent)'', remove the figure ``3.25'', and 
add, in its place, ``3.50''.

Appendix C to Part 4022--[Corrected]

0
2. On page 17396, in the table for Appendix C to Part 4022, under 
``Immediate annuity rate (percent)'', remove the figure ``3.25'', and 
add, in its place, ``3.50''.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on this 16th day of April 2009.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Acting Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9-9212 Filed 4-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-01-P