alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7968

GHAZI GHABAYEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TOM CARROLL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (CA-05-70-5-FL)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ghazi Ghabayen, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ghazi Ghabayen seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ghabayen has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability, deny Ghabayen’s motion for appointment of

counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. GONG KIM, Defendant - Appellant. No. 11-30021 D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00025-HA-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted January 12, 2012 Seattle, Washington Before: O’SCANNLAIN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY, District Judge. ** Gong Kim pled guilty to one count of exporting munitions without a license in violation of 22 U.S.C. § 2778. On appeal, Kim argues that the district court 

# FILED
JAN 18 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 should have found a base offense level of 14 because his offense “involved only non-fully automatic small arms (rifles, handguns, or shotguns), and the number of weapons did not exceed ten.” United Stat es Sentencing Guidelines § 2M5.2(a)(2). The district court correctly found a base offense level of 26 because Kim exported gun parts, which are not “non-fully automatic small arms” within the definition of section 2M5.2(a)(2). See United States v. Carper , 659 F.3d 923, 924–25 (9th Cir. 2011). Moreover, Kim’s o ffense involved enough parts to service more than ten weapons. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.2
                                CFO Certification



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. S 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Laredo  Investment  Corp. on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Richard  Pierce,
President and Chief Executive  Officer  (acting Chief Financial  Officer) of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of
                operations of the Company.



/s/ Richard Pierce
Richard Pierce, President and Chief Executive Officer
(acting Chief Financial Officer)
August 9, 2002
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
Post Office Box 26149
Richmond, VA 23260-6149
1-800-634-7928

SUN TRUST (LOGO)

MTG PRTNRSHP FINANCE CORP
C/O NORWEST BANK, MINN NA
11000 BROKEN LAND PARKWAY
COLUMBlUA, MD. 21044
ATN: LN ACCTING DEPT.
RE:ANNUAL SERVICING CERTIFICATION

In connection with the loans serviced by SunTrust Mortgage Inc. for MTG PRTNRSHP
FINANCE CORP, I, the  undersigned  officer,  hereby  certify the following as of
December 31, 1999:

*    All real estate taxes,  special assessments and any charges that may become
     a lien upon the  property and which  became due in the last  calendar  year
     have been paid.  This also  includes  verification  of payment  with taxing
     authorities for non-impound accounts.

*    For those loans with  escrow/impound  accounts for the payment of taxes and
     insurance,  sufficient  amounts are being collected  monthly to provide for
     payment of future amounts due.

*    All FHA  insurance  premiums  or  private  mortgage  insurance  premiums,if
     applicable, have been paid and such coverage is in full force and effect.

*    All  properties  are  adequately  insured  against  casualty  loss and,  if
     applicable,  flood loss and we are in  possession  of the  original  hazard
     insurance and flood insurance policies.

*    Fidelity Bond coverage of $100,000,000  and Errors and Ommissions  coverage
     of $28,500,000  is adequate and in place and the  applicable  premiums have
     been paid.

*    All interest and/or monthly payment  adjustments for ARM and GPM loans have
     been made in accordance with the mortgage  terms.  Timely and proper notice
     of such changes was provided to to the mortgagor.

*    All property inspections have been completed according to the provisions of
     our Servicing Agreement, if applicable.

*    The P&I  custodial  account and any clearing  accounts are  maintained in a
     depository  institution  the  deposits  of which  are  insured  by the Bank
     Insurance Fund. The depository institution meets or exceeds the most recent
     financial rating requirements set forth by FNMA.

*    We have complied with all other provisions of the Servicing Agreement.

*    We are in compliance  with IRS  requirements  and all federal,  state,  and
     local laws for  reporting  the  receipt of  interest,  payment of fees,  or
     acquisition of properties.


*    To  the  best  of my  knowledge  and  upon  reasonable  investigation,  the
     servicing  of the  Mortgage  Loans  during  the  preceding  year  has  been
     conducted  in  compliance  with  all  other  provisions  of  the  Servicing
     Agreement(s)/Purchase  and  SaleAgreement(s)  barring  such  exceptions  as
     listed.  Any exceptions to this  certification  are listed on an attachment
     along with explanations concerning their completion. If none are listed, it
     should be considered that there are no exceptions.



BY:  Deborah D. Mobley
     (signature)


    DATE: March 23,2000

    Deborah D. Mobley, VP
    (name and title)
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3258 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to clarify the 

maximum distance between Farm Service Agency county offices for purposes of the closure or relocation of a county office for the Farm 

Service Agency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2012 

Mrs. MCCASKILL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 

to clarify the maximum distance between Farm Service 

Agency county offices for purposes of the closure or 

relocation of a county office for the Farm Service Agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3258 IS

1 SECTION 1. DRIVING DISTANCE FOR PURPOSES OF PROHI2 BITION ON CLOSURE OR RELOCATION OF 

3 COUNTY OFFICES FOR THE FARM SERVICE 

4 AGENCY. 

5 Section 14212(b)(1) of the Food, Conservation, and 

6 Energy Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 6932a(b)(1)) is amended 

7 by inserting ‘‘driving’’ after ‘‘20’’ each place it appears. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3210 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3210

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the treatment under 
contracting goals and preferences of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
 for small businesses owned by veterans of small businesses after the 
       death of a disabled veteran owner, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. Burr) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the treatment under 
contracting goals and preferences of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
 for small businesses owned by veterans of small businesses after the 
       death of a disabled veteran owner, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Small Business Opportunity 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF TREATMENT UNDER CONTRACTING GOALS AND 
              PREFERENCES OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR SMALL 
              BUSINESSES OWNED BY VETERANS OF SMALL BUSINESSES AFTER 
              DEATH OF DISABLED VETERAN OWNERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 8127(h) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``rated as'' and all that 
        follows through ``disability.'' and inserting a period; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by amending subparagraph (C) to read 
        as follows:
            ``(C) The date that--
                    ``(i) in the case of a surviving spouse of a 
                veteran with a service-connected disability rated as 
                100 percent disabling or who dies as a result of a 
                service-connected disability, is 10 years after the 
                date of the veteran's death; or
                    ``(ii) in the case of a surviving spouse of a 
                veteran with a service-connected disability rated as 
                less than 100 percent disabling who does not die as a 
                result of a service-connected disability, is three 
                years after the date of the veteran's death.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to contracts awarded 
on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Zhong Ya Li, Chief financial officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 11 , 2010


By:
                          s/ Zhong Ya LiZhong
      Ya Li, Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3119 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3119

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on disperse red 60.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on disperse red 60.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE RED 60.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.49 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to disperse red 60) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WHO HAVE FILED AGREEMENTSTO BE APPROVED AS ADEPOSITORY OFTRUST ACCOUNTS AND TO PROVIDE DISHONORED CHECK REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 221, Pa.R.D.E. New Name Change 205 Farmers National Bank of Emlenton — Change to 658 Farmers National BankofCanfield 456 Prudential Savings Bank —Change to 58 Fulton Bank 638 Norristown Bell Credit Union — Change to 3Hill Credit Union Platinum Leader Change Correction Removal 350 HSBC Bank USA, NA

January 2023
Exhibit 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TORULE 13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Helix BioPharma Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Photios (Frank) Michalargias, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: October 31, 2011/s/ Photios (Frank) MichalargiasName:

   Photios (Frank) MichalargiasTitle:

   Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Helix BioPharma Corp. and will be retained by Helix BioPharma Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7607

JOHN DAVID BALLARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HICKORY POLICE DEPARTMENT; CATAWBA COUNTY;

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. H. Brent McKnight, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-74)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John David Ballard, Appellant Pro Se. Allan R. Gitter, WOMBLE,

CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Bryan

Elliott Beatty, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The magistrate judge had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's order* dismissing

Appellant's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) claims. We have reviewed the

record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate

judge. Ballard v. Hickory Police Dep't, No. CA-95-74 (W.D.N.C. Oct.

1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








_/s/_________________________


Ron
Ruskowsky


Chief
Financial Officer


August
13, 2010
Second Amendment to the Lease Agreement



 Exhibit 10.48 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE dated as of January 31,
2008 (“Second Amendment”) is made by and between EAST KEENE RE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company having an office at 7 Corporate Drive, Keene, New Hampshire 03431 (“Landlord”) and MERRIMACK SERVICES CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation having an office at 730 Milford Road, Merrimack, New Hampshire 03054 (“Tenant”). 
 WHEREAS, Landlord is the
owner of certain real property known as and by the street address 10 Optical Avenue, Keene, New Hampshire (the “Real Property”); 
 WHEREAS, Tenant occupies a portion of the Real Property (the “Premises”) pursuant to that certain Lease Agreement dated November 16, 2000, between Landlord’s predecessor-in-interest, Whatman, Inc., as landlord, and
Tenant, as Tenant, as modified by that certain First Amendment to Lease dated as of April 21, 2006 (together, and as so amended, the “Lease”) and as such Premises are more particularly described in the Lease; 
 WHEREAS, Tenant has provided Landlord with written notice of its election to exercise its option to extend the Lease for a two-year period commencing on
May 23 2008 and ending on May 22, 2010 (the “Second Option Period”) in accordance with the terms thereof; 
 WHEREAS,
Landlord and Tenant desire to enter into this Second Amendment to confirm the extension of the term of the Lease and the rent payable by Tenant during the remaining term of the Lease as so extended. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as
follows: 
 1. Capitalized Terms. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the
meanings set forth in the Lease. 
 2. Term. The term of the Lease is hereby extended to May 22, 2010. 
 3. Rent. The base rent for the Second Option Period shall be $11,936.60 per month inclusive of the rent for the parking area, subject to increase
per CPI in accordance with Subsection 4(c) of the Lease. 
 4. No Remaining Options. Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that Tenant has
no remaining options to extend the term of the Lease. 
 5. Entire Amendment. Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms,
conditions and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. 
 6. Successors and Assigns. This Second Amendment
shall be binding on Landlord and Tenant and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Landlord and Tenant have each executed this Second Amendment as of the date first
written above. 
  

							
	WITNESS:	 		 	LANDLORD:
				
	 /s/ S. McPherson
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Noel M. Spear

	S. McPherson	 		 	Name:	 	Noel M. Spear
		 		 	Title:	 	Vice President of Real Estate
			
	WITNESS:	 		 	TENANT:
		 		 	Merrimack Services Corporation
	 /s/ Jessica Scalese
	 		 		 	
	Jessica Scalese	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert Pratt

		 		 	Name:	 	Robert Pratt
		 		 	Title:	 	V.P. Facilities & Site Services