alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15

- 0162 Filed April 27, 2016

JACK L. LOSEE JR. , Applicant

- Appellant,

vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent

- Appellee.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie K. Vaudt , Judge.

An applicant appeals the district court’s denial of his application for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.

Magdalena Reese of Cooper, Goedicke, Reimer & Reese , West Des Moines , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Darrel Mullins , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Vogel and Potterfield, JJ.2

V OGEL, Judge. Jack Losee Jr. was c onvicted of two counts of first

- degree murder in 1983. His conviction was affirmed by the supreme court in 1984. See State v. Losee , 354 N.W.2d 239, 240 (Iowa 1984). Losee filed the current application for postconvictio n relief (PCR) in 2005 , and the matter proceeded to a trial in 2014. He argued newly discovered evidence should entitle him to a new trial , and alternatively , if the evidence was not newly discovered, his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to presen t it

. In a thorough and exhaustive decision, t he district court determined the information Losee presented was not newly discovered, and thus, his PCR application was barred by the three

- year statute of limitations. See Iowa Code § 822.3 (2005). In addi tion, the court concluded Losee’s ineffective

- assistance claim failed because the evidence complained of was impeaching, cumulative , or not material . The court likewise rejected Losee’s pro se claims of ineffective assistance that addressed the trial test imony of a clinical psychologist. On appeal, Losee again asserts he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and, alternatively, if it was not newly discovered then he should be granted a new trial because of counsel’s ineffectivene ss. Having reviewed the record and the district court’s decision, we affirm the court’s denial of Losee’s PCR application pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(d) and (e).
AFFIRMED.
SERVED: March 24, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MA ITER OF 

RIDAN INVESTMENTS, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2013-1082 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin has transferred to the Food and Drug 

Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to 

Administrative Law Judge Douglas M. Rawald. Any dates set for hearing or prehearing 

conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain in full force and effect 

absent further order. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment-Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W I 000 1 

President, Ridan Investments, Respondent 

18540 Minthorn Street 

Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Lawrence M. Burek, Respondent's Counsel 

550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 

Santa Ana, CA 92705 

TEL: 714-564-9033 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Tammy Leach 

P.O. Box 891324 

Temecula, CA 92589 

TEL: 951-970-6762 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7' 11 A venue, Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (EII-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 13-1082 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W 1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Interlock
Services, Inc. d/b/a New York International Commerce Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh
Austin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Hugh Austin
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Hugh Austin
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        October 10, 2002
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2889 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on capers, prepared or preserved 

by vinegar or acetic acid, in containers holding 3.4 kg or less. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on capers, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, in containers holding 3.4 kg or less. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPERS, PREPARED OR PRESERVED BY VIN4 EGAR OR ACETIC ACID, IN CONTAINERS 

5 HOLDING 3.4 KG OR LESS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.26 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 capers, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, 

9 in containers holding 3.4 kg or less) is amended by strikVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:45 May 15, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2889.IS S2889

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2889 IS

1 ing the date in the effective period column and inserting 

2 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40070

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alejandro Diaz-Roman, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:19-CR-757-1

Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro DiazRoman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Diaz-Roman has not filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-40070 Document: 00515914683 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/25/2021
No. 20-40070

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 20-40070 Document: 00515914683 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/25/2021
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Medizone International, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Edwin G. Marshall, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Edwin G. Marshall

Edwin G. Marshall, Principal Executive Officer



Date: June 19, 2006





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.4

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-199736) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-126715, 333-141397, 333-171206, 333-192821, 333-200953 and 333-215273) of the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust of our report dated March 9, 2016, relating to the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust Financial Statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. 

 

| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                  |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP

Jersey, Channel Islands

March 8, 2017 |

 

E26        ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHELL ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F 2016
EXHIBIT 99.17

ALR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
1201 Cornwall Ave., Suite 203
Bellingham, WA
98225
Fax: (360) 650-0032
Tel: (360) 650-9100

February 2, 2001

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Ken Robulak
3029 W. Alpine Drive
Bellingham, WA 98225

Dear Ken:

This letter serves to document the terms of the settlement between ALR Technologies Inc. (AALRT@
) and yourself as agreed upon in your meeting with Mr. Sidney Chan on January 31, 2001. If you are in agreement with these terms, please acknowledge this agreement by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy to our office along with a
fax copy to (604) 684-7723.

You will be paid a total of $75,000 in settlement of all claims for fees, salaries and expenses.

You will be entitled to options for 1,500,000 shares of ALRT with a term of five years and an exercise price of $0.25 per share as per the attached option agreement.

You will execute the attached Full and Final Release of All Claims.

You will execute the attached Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement.

You will be granted an Indemnity as per the attached.

Yours very truly,

ALR Technologies Inc.

Sidney Chan

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

The above terms are accepted on the date indicated below

April 15, 2001
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 4, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135680 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135680 COA: 282164 Kent CC: 07-002709-FC JAVIER ALONSO, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0528 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 4, 2008

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2693 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2693

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on micro-porous, ultrafine, 
spherical polyamide powders of polyamide 6; polyamide-12; and polyamide 
                                 6, 12.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on micro-porous, ultrafine, 
spherical polyamide powders of polyamide 6; polyamide-12; and polyamide 
                                 6, 12.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MICRO-POROUS, ULTRAFINE, SPHERICAL POLYAMIDE POWDERS OF 
              POLYAMIDE 6; POLYAMIDE-12; AND POLYAMIDE 6, 12.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.39.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to micro-porous, ultrafine, 
spherical polyamide powders of polyamide 6; polyamide-12; and polyamide 
6, 12) is amended by striking the date in the effective period column 
and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
VINCENT W.IIORRI(;AN County Executive

Kevin Schlemmer 

### CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE Gerace Office Building- 3 N. Erie St.- Mayville, NY 14757-1007 (716) 753-4211 -FAX (716) 753-4756- horriganv@co.chautaugua.ny.uswww.co.chautaugua.ny.us

August 14.2014

Office ofAviation Analysis US Department ofTransportation Mr. Schlemmer: , ....

;

.,..,.J

We are delighted to have Sun Air as ournew EAS carrierat Jamestown, and look forward to working with the Sun Airteam to build a strong passenger bases as soon as possible. Those we have spoken with in ourcommunity feel that returning to Pittsburgh as ourhub airport will prove to be a much better link to both domestic and international destinations. The addition ofa founh flight offered by Sun Air is a definite indication ofthe airline'scommitment to provide much improved service. Throughout the process ofthe EAS bid procedure, David Hackett, president and CEO ofSun Air International made it clearto us that he was basing his marketingand financing plans on being able to secure a four yearcontact with the DOT. We strongly support that premise, as was evidenced by our letter ofsupport for Sun Airpreviously sent to youroffice. We agreed with Mr. Hackett that a twoyear contractcould have a detrimental effect on his marketing efforts, as we both felt more time was needed to overcome the negative feelings in ourcommunitytowards ourpresent EAS carrier. Even though his bid was presented in that light, we know the award was for a two-year period. What we don't know is whetherthere is any latitude within the rules ofthe DOR to extend his contract an additional twoyears. Ifit is possible, we definitely would support such a change. Not only would the additional time help Sun Airjustify spending more time and money marketingand 11nancing the service. but it would provide ourcommunity with the stability that has been lacking. We are confident Pittsburgh will be a winner for us and we will do everything we can to grow community awareness, resulting in ever increasing passenger counts. Respectfully yours.

# (/AJAVincent W. Horrigan Chautauqua Count
Exhibit
      32.1




ION
      Networks, Inc.




CERTIFICATION





In
      connection with the periodic report of ION Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Norman E. Corn, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
      purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to ION Networks, Inc. and will be retained
      by
      ION Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.






Date:
            July
                11, 2005
            
            By:
            /s/
                Norman E. CornNorman
                E. CornChief
                Executive Officer










19
exv4w9w2






EXHIBIT 4.9.2




SECOND SENIOR SECURED NOTES REGISTRATION RIGHTS JOINDER




     With respect to the Senior Secured Notes Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October
15, 2010, among RGHL US Escrow I Inc., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware (the “US Corporate Escrow Issuer”), RGHL US Escrow I LLC, a limited liability company
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “US LLC Escrow Issuer”) and RGHL Escrow
Issuer (Luxembourg) I S.A., a company incorporated as a société anonyme (a public limited liability
company) under the laws of Luxembourg (the “Lux Escrow Issuer” and, together with the US Corporate
Escrow Issuer and the US LLC Escrow Issuer, the “Escrow Issuers”), and Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, as representative of the Initial Purchasers (as defined therein and, such agreement, the
“Senior Secured Notes Registration Rights Agreement”), for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, each of the signatories hereto assumes all
of the rights and obligations as Guarantors under the Senior Secured Notes Registration Rights
Agreement, in each case, as of November 16, 2010, the date hereof and as though it had entered into
the Senior Secured Notes Registration Rights Agreement on October 15, 2010. The obligations assumed
by the Guarantors under this Joinder shall be joint and several obligations. Capitalized terms used
but not defined in this Joinder shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Senior Secured
Notes Registration Rights Agreement.



 









 





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,



PACTIV CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Helen Dorothy Golding
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Helen Dorothy Golding 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	PACTIV FACTORING LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Helen Dorothy Golding
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Helen Dorothy Golding 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	PACTIV GERMANY HOLDINGS INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Helen Dorothy Golding
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Helen Dorothy Golding 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	PACTIV INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Helen Dorothy Golding
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Helen Dorothy Golding 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	PACTIV MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Helen Dorothy Golding
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Helen Dorothy Golding 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	PCA WEST INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Helen Dorothy Golding
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Helen Dorothy Golding 	 
	 	 	Title:
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 24 October 2006         

amending Decision 90/424/EEC on expenditure in the veterinary field

(2006/782/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (2),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 90/424/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 1 August 2008.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 24 October 2006.

For the Council

The President

J. KORKEAOJA            

----

(1)  Opinion of 27 April 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2)OJ C 88, 11.4.2006, p. 13. Opinion delivered following non-compulsory consultation.

(3)OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 19. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/53/EC (OJ L 29, 2.2.2006, p. 37).

(4)OJ L 337, 30.12.1999, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 485/2005 (OJ L 81, 30.3.2005, p. 1).

(5)  See page 14 of this Official Journal.

(6)OJ L 223, 15.8.2006, p. 1.

----
E E RE I nformation C enter

P rograms and O ffic es

Search Help M ore Search O ptions

P rintable V ersion

High-Intensity Discharge Lamps Final

Determination Technical Support

Document

This Technical Support Document provides the

technical analyses and results in support of the final

determination for high-intensity discharge (HID)

lamps.

Some of the following documents are available as

Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader.

Title Page (PDF 84 KB)

Acronyms and Abbreviations (PDF 88 KB)

Chapter 1: Introduction (PDF 141 KB)

Chapter 2: Market Assessment (PDF 389 KB)

Chapter 3: Technology Assessment (PDF 976

KB)

Chapter 4: Engineering Analysis (PDF 181 KB)

Chapter 5: Life-C ycle Cost and Payback Period

Analysis (PDF 449 KB)

Chapter 6: Potential National Energy and

Consumer Impacts of Energy Conservation

Standards for High-Intensity Discharge Lamps

(PDF 164 KB)

Appendices Appendix A: Non-Regulatory

Incentive Programs (PDF 215 KB)

Contact Information

Linda Graves

Lighting Standards Project Manager

(202) 586-1851

P rintable V ersion

Building Te chnologie s Program Hom e | EERE Hom e | U.S. Departm ent o f Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Se curity & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 07/02/2010

8/18/2010 Appliances and Commercial Equipment...

...energy.gov/.../hid_lamps_final_tech... 1/1
JUNE 16, 2015

US Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

The two aircraft which UVT will be operating u nder this exemption request will be as follows.

AIRCRAFT #1

M ake : DJI

Model : S100 0 Premium

Platform : Rotary

- wing

Maximum Weight (lb) : 24.25 lbs

Propulsion System : Electric

AIRCRAFT #2

Make : DJI

Mod el : Ph antom 2

Platform : Rotary

- win g

Maximum Weight (lb) : 2.87 lbs

Propulsion Sys tem : E lectric Unmanned Vehicle Technologies, LLC

151 N Maitland Avenue

No. 948595

Maitland, FL 32751

407.218.6355

Info@uvt.email

www.uvt.us