alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The  undersigned  hereby  certifies that the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of
Medizone International, Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission,  fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m)
and that  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Medizone
International, Inc.


Date:  June 14, 2005            /s/ Steve M. Hanni
       -----------------        ----------------------------------------------
                                Steve M. Hanni
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Financial Officer)
Muldoon, Albert (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

janey pillsbury <jpillsbury49@gmail.com> 

Wednesday, June 12, 2013 4:05 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Air Service in El Dorado 

• --l -···, -----, 

.: _-; ' -· 

We are very happy with Seaport and hope it continues to serve us. The Dallas connection is wonderful as is the 

Memphis one. The customer service is exceptional and we love the friendly pilots. 

Dr. and Mrs. Richard C Pillsbury 

Janey Pillsbury 

Beach Philosophy 101: 

A wise woman once said, "Ifyou're lucky enough to be at the beach, you're lucky enough." 

jpillsbury49@gmail.com 

Check out my website-at 

www.janeypillsbury.com 

870 863 0010 

870 310 9950 

1
October 2, 2015

Mr. Greg Hesser

4843 N orth Willamette Blvd

Portland, O R 97203

Dear Mr . Hesser :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

sections of part 49 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we

can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your June 9, 2015, exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2858 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please v isit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemptio n.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 MARK NEWTON,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 31,824

5 VINCENT MASTRONTONI,

6 BETTY GARRISON, and 

7 WEBB GARRISON,

8 Respondents-Appellees.

9 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

10 Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge

11 Will Ferguson & Associates

12 David M. Houliston

13 Albuquerque, NM

14 Collins & Collins, P.C.

15 Parrish Collins

16 Albuquerque, NM

17 for Appellant

18 Kalm Law Firm, P.C.

19 Megan M. Kalm

20 Albuquerque, NM

21 for Appellees
2

1 MEMORANDUM OPINION

2 VIGIL, Judge.

3 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

5 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

6 DISMISSED.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 _______________________________

9 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

10 WE CONCUR:

11 _________________________________

12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

13 _________________________________

14 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 10:54:25 AM

To: Shebik, Ronald; Raymond, Michael; AS_Waiver_Requests;

Armstrong, Ashley; Llenza, Charles

Subject: RE: Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver

- Hussmann Bulk Produce Cases

Auto forwarded by a Rule

One additional note

– the notice to other manufacturers was sent Robert Weeks of Kysor/Warren and

Larry Howington of Hill Phoenix. The names of these individuals differ from what is on the application.

However, these individuals deal directly with compliance to DOE and understand the laws and

requirements.

Thank you,

Ron Shebik

Regulatory Compliance Manager

Hussmann Corporation

12999 St. Charles Rock Road

Bridgeton, MO 63044

314.298.6483

ron_shebik@hussmann.com

From: Shebik, Ronald

Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5:26 PM

To: 'Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov'; 'AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov'; 'Armstrong, Ashley'; 'Llenza,

Charles'

Subject: RE: Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver

- Hussmann Bulk Produce Cases

Mr. Raymond, Ms. Armstrong, Mr. Llenza

I also included a pdf of the signed copies.

Thank you,

Ron Shebik

Regulatory Compliance Manager

Hussmann Corporation

12999 St. Charles Rock Road

Bridgeton, MO 63044

314.298.6483

ron_shebik@hussmann.com

From: Shebik, Ronald

Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5:13 PMTo: 'Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov'; 'AS_Waiver_Requests@ee.doe.gov'; 'Armstrong, Ashley'; Llenza,

Charles

Subject: Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver

- Hussmann Bulk Produce Cases

Mr. Raymond, Ms. Armstrong, Mr. Llenza

I have attached the Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver documents. Please let me

know if you have any questions or any further action is needed.

Thank you,

Ron Shebik

Regulatory Com pliance Manager

Hussmann Corporation

12999 St. Charles Rock Road

Bridgeton, MO 63044

314.298.6483

ron_shebik@hussmann.com

The information contained in this message is privileged and intended only for the recipients named. If the reader is not a representative of the

intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or the information it contains is prohibited. If you have received this

message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete the original message and attachments.
Document

EXHIBIT 10.34

AMENDMENT TWO
TO THE 
REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION NON-QUALIFIED EXCESS 401(k) PLAN
(AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JUNE 1, 2020)


Regions Financial Corporation hereby amends the Regions Financial Corporation Non-Qualified Excess 401(k) Plan, generally effective as of November 30, 2021, as follows:


1.    Section 2.2(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing said subsection in its entirety with the following: 


“any other entity which, along with the Company, is a member of a controlled group of employers under Code Section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o); provided, however, that neither BlackArch Partners LLC nor any Affiliate that has not been approved for participation in the Plan as described in Section 8.1 shall be considered to be an Affiliate for purposes of coverage under or participation in the Plan or the Legacy Regions Plan and shall only be considered to be an Affiliate to the extent specifically required by law (e.g., for compliance with the Code Section 409A requirement of separation from service with Affiliates for distributions).”


2.    Section 2.9 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing the first sentence therein with the following: “Employee means any person who is employed by the Company or a participating Affiliate as described in Section 8.1.”


3.    Section 2.10 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing the first sentence therein with the following: “Employer means the Company and each participating Affiliate as described in Section 8.1.”   


4.    Section 8.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing said subsection in its entirety with the following: 


“As of November 30, 2021, all Affiliates (other than BlackArch Partners LLC) are deemed participating Affiliates; provided, however, that this rule shall not apply to any business entity that becomes a subsidiary in the future, whether through acquisition or otherwise, unless and until the business entity has been duly approved for participation in the Plan.”


5.    Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Derek Resources Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward G. Byrd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  September 30, 2005



DEREK OIL & GAS CORPORATION





/s/ Edward G. Byrd

_______________________
Edward G. Byrd

Chief Financial Officer and Director
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3136 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Imidacloprid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Imidacloprid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMIDACLOPRID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.32 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Imidacloprid) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GFR  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2004, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Richard Pierce,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Richard Pierce
Richard Pierce
CEO, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 15, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                               OF
                    ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

Kenneth P. Coleman and Mary Kay Koldeway certify that:

     1.    They are the President and Secretary, respectively, of
       AimRite Holdings Corporation a Nevada Corporation.

     2.   ARTICLE FOURTH is amended to read as follows:

       FOURTH: Capital Stock

       1.   Classes and Number of Shares The total number of shares of
       all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority
       to issue is One Hundred Fifty Million (150,000,000) consisting of
       One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of common stock, par
       value of $0.001 per share (the "Common Stock") and Fifty Million
       (50,000,000) shares of the Preferred Stock which have a par value
       of $0.001 per share (the "Preferred Stock") consisting of into
       One Million (1,000,000) shares Series A (the "Series A Preferred
       Stock"), Two Million (2,000,000) shares (The "Series B Preferred
       Stock") and Forty Seven Million (47,000,000) shares Series C (The
       "Series C Preferred Stock").

     3.   The forgoing amendment has been approved by the Board of
       Directors.

     4.   The forgoing amendment has been duly approved by a vote of
       the shareholders in accordance with the Nevada Corporations Code.
       The Corporation has two classes of stock however only the common
       stock has outstanding shares. The number of shares voting in
       favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required.

     5.   The percentage vote required was more than 50%.

          We  further  declare under the laws  of  the  state  of
     Nevada  that  the matters set forth in this certificate  are
     true and correct of our own knowledge

          Dated: May 15, 1999           /s/ Kenneth P. Coleman
                                        Kenneth P. Coleman
                                        President

                                        /s/ Mary Kay Koldeway
                                        Mary Kay Koldeway
                                        Secretary
AAM-11-436-E September 8, 2011

Exemption No. 10354 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0938

Mr. Kurt Gross Wings Air Charter, LLC 236 Airport Hangar Drive Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494

Dear Mr. Gross:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By submission received August 22, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Wings Air Charter, LLC (WAC) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), to allow WAC, which is operating under separate parts of 14 CFR, to cover its safety-sensitive employee under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to WAC.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Wings Air Charter, LLC an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow WAC, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of WAC are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the WAC part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TAA-65,253]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 13, 2009, in response to a petition filed by the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers on behalf of workers of CB&I Inc., Warren, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-8920 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Appendix M 

Class I Areas AOI Contribution Spreadsheets
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
     Legend:  This schedule contains  financial  information  extracted from (A)
interim   consolidated  balance  sheets,   interim  cosloidated   statements  of
operations and consolidated statements of changes in stockholders' equity and is
qualified in its entirety by  reference  to such (B)  Guarantors  report on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                  JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                                              3,842
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   36,864
<PP&E>                                                             17,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      6,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    152,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             563,606
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                          128,809    
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (539,314)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      152,511
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  558,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   5704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (563,711)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (563,711)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (563,711)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
                                                              

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, J. Gordon Huszagh,
President & Chief Executive Officer of Suffolk Bancorp (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|Dated: December 20, 2011           
|                                   
|/s/ J. Gordon Huszagh              
|J. Gordon Huszagh                  
|President & Chief Executive Officer