Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 77 / Thursday, April 23, 2009 / Notices 18573 

for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Schaefer, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards, Sector Policies and 

Programs Division (D243–05), 

Measurement Policy Group, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711; telephone number: (919) 541– 

0296; fax number: (919) 541–3207; email address: schaefer.john@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has 

submitted the following ICR to OMB for 

review and approval according to the 

procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. 

On May 30, 2008 (73 FR 31088), EPA 

sought comments on this ICR pursuant 

to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no 

comments. Any additional comments on 

this ICR should be submitted to EPA 

and OMB within 30 days of this notice. 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this ICR under docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OECA–2008–0430, which is 

available for public viewing online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, in-person 

viewing at the Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket 

Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744 and 

the telephone number for the 

Enforcement and Compliance Docket is 

(202) 566–1927. 

Use EPA’s electronic docket and 

comment system at http:// 

www.regulations.gov to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the docket, and 

to access those documents in the docket 

that are available electronically. Once in 

the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then 

key in the docket ID number identified 

above. Please note that EPA’s policy is 

that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, 

as EPA receives them and without 

change, unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, Confidential 

Business Information (CBI), or other 

information whose public disclosure is 

restricted by statute. For further 

information about the electronic docket, 

go to www.regulations.gov. 

Title: NESHAP for the Surface Coating 

of Large Household and Commercial 

Appliances (Renewal). 

ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 

1954.04, OMB Control Number 2060– 

0457. 

ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to 

expire on June 30, 2009. Under OMB 

regulations, the Agency may continue to 

conduct or sponsor the collection of 

information while this submission is 

pending at OMB. An Agency may not 

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

The OMB control numbers for EPA’s 

regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after 

appearing in the Federal Register when 

approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, 

and displayed either by publication in 

the Federal Register or by other 

appropriate means, such as on the 

related collection instrument or form, if 

applicable. The display of OMB control 

numbers in certain EPA regulations is 

consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. 

Abstract: The National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP), for the Surface Coating of 

Large Household and Commercial 

Appliances were proposed on December 

22, 2000 (65 FR 81133) and promulgated 

on July 23, 2002 (67 FR 48253). 

These regulations apply to existing 

facilities and new facilities that perform 

surface coating of large household and 

commercial appliances and related parts 

where the total Hazardous Air 

Pollutants (HAPs) emitted are greater 

than or equal to 10 tons per year of any 

one HAP; or where the total HAPs 

emitted are greater than or equal to 25 

tons per year of any combination of 

HAPs. 

In general, all NESHAP standards 

require initial notifications, 

performance tests, and periodic reports 

by the owners/operators of the affected 

facilities. They are also required to 

maintain records of the occurrence and 

duration of any startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction in the operation of an 

affected facility, or any period during 

which the monitoring system is 

inoperative. These notifications, reports, 

and records are essential in determining 

compliance, and are required of all 

affected facilities subject to NESHAP. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 97 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements which have subsequently 

changed; train personnel to be able to 

respond to a collection of information; 

search data sources; complete and 

review the collection of information; 

and transmit or otherwise disclose the 

information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities: Large 

household and commercial appliance 

manufacturers. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

90. 

Frequency of Response: Initially, 

occasionally, and semiannually. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 

28,845. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost: 

$2,498,984, which includes: $2,326,984 

in labor costs, $64,000 in annualized 

Capital/Start-Up costs, and $108,000 in 

O&M costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is no 

change in the total estimated burden 

currently identified in the OMB 

Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. 

Dated: April 17, 2009. 

John Moses, 

Acting Director, Collection Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. E9–9338 Filed 4–22–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0352; FRL8786–5] 

Second Draft Risk and Exposure 

Assessment Report for Sulfur Dioxide 

(SO2) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of second draft report for 

public review and comment. 

SUMMARY: On or about March 19, 2009, 

the Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards (OAQPS) of EPA is making 

available for public review and 

comment a draft document titled ‘‘Risk 

and Exposure Assessment to Support 

the Review of the SO2 Primary National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards: Second 

Draft.’’ The purpose of this draft 

document is to convey the approach 

taken to assess exposures to ambient 

SO2 and to characterize associated 

health risks, as well as to present the 

results of those assessments. 

DATES: Comments on the above report 

must be received on or before May 20, 

2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2007–0352, by one of the 

following methods: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
18574 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 77 / Thursday, April 23, 2009 / Notices 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: Comments may be sent by 

electronic mail (e-mail) to a-and-rdocket@epa.gov, Attention Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0352. 

• Fax: Fax your comments to 202– 

566–9744, Attention Docket ID. No. 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0352. 

• Mail: Send your comments to: Air 

and Radiation Docket and Information 

Center, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0352. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver 

your comments to: EPA Docket Center, 

1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Room 

3334, Washington, DC. Such deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket’s 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007– 

0352. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Docket in the EPA Docket 

Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC. This Docket Facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

Docket telephone number is 202–566– 

1742; fax 202–566–9744. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Michael Stewart, Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards (Mailcode 

C504–06), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Research Triangle 

Park, NC 27711; e-mail: 

stewart.michael@epa.gov; telephone: 

919–541–7524; fax: 919–541–0237. 

General Information 

A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare 

My Comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly 

mark the part or all of the information 

that you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

• Follow directions—The agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

• Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

• Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

• If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

• Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

• Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies 

and lists certain pollutants which 

‘‘cause or contribute to air pollution 

which may reasonably be anticipated to 

endanger public health or welfare.’’ The 

EPA then issues air quality criteria for 

listed pollutants, which are commonly 

referred to as ‘‘criteria pollutants.’’ The 

air quality criteria are to ‘‘accurately 

reflect the latest scientific knowledge 

useful in indicating the kind and extent 

of all identifiable effects on public 

health or welfare which may be 

expected from the presence of [a] 

pollutant in the ambient air, in varying 

quantities.’’ Under section 109 of the 

CAA, EPA establishes national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS) for each 

listed pollutant, with the NAAQS based 

on the air quality criteria. Section 109(d) 

of the CAA requires periodic review 

and, if appropriate, revision of existing 

air quality criteria. The revised air 

quality criteria reflect advances in 

scientific knowledge on the effects of 

the pollutant on public health or 

welfare. The EPA is also required to 

periodically review and revise the 

NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the 

revised criteria. 

Air quality criteria have been 

established for the sulfur oxides (SOX) 

and NAAQS have been established for 

sulfur dioxide (SO2), an indicator for 

SOX. Presently, EPA is reviewing the air 

quality criteria for SOX and the NAAQS 

for SO2. As part of its review of the 

NAAQS, EPA has prepared an 

assessment of exposures and 

characterization of health risks 

associated with ambient SO2. Planned 

approaches to assessing exposures and 

characterizing risks were described in 

the document, Sulfur Dioxide Health 

Assessment Plan: Scope and Methods 

for Exposure and Risk Assessment. This 

planning document was released for 

public review and comment in 

November 2007 and was the subject of 

a consultation with the Clean Air 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 77 / Thursday, April 23, 2009 / Notices 18575 

Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) 

on December 5 and 6, 2007. Comments 

received from that consultation were 

considered in developing the ‘‘Risk and 

Exposure Assessment to Support the 

Review of the SO2 Primary National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards: First 

Draft,’’ which was released in July 2008. 

The second draft document being 

released at this time conveys the 

approach taken to assess exposures to 

ambient SO2 and to characterize 

associated health risks, as well as to 

present the results of those assessments. 

In addition, this document also contains 

a staff policy assessment that considers 

the evidence presented in the final 

Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) 

and the exposure and risk 

characterization results presented in 

this second draft document, as they 

relate to the adequacy of the current SO2

NAAQS and any potential alternative 

primary SO2 standards. This draft 

document will be available online at: 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ 

standards/so2/s_so2_cr_rea.html. 

The EPA is soliciting advice and 

recommendations from the CASAC by 

means of a review of the draft document 

at an upcoming public meeting of the 

CASAC scheduled for April 16–17, 2009 

in Chapel Hill, NC. Information about 

this public meeting will be published as 

a separate notice in the Federal 

Register. Following the CASAC 

meeting, EPA will consider comments 

received from the CASAC and the 

public in preparing a final risk and 

exposure assessment report. 

Dated: March 18, 2009. 

Stephen D. Page, 

Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards. 

[FR Doc. E9–9336 Filed 4–22–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Submitted for 

Review to the Office of Management 

and Budget, Comments Requested 

April 14, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. 

An agency may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before May 26, 2009. If 

you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the FCC contact listed below as 

soon as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 

395–5167 or the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov, Federal 

Communications Commission, or an email to PRA@fcc.gov. To view a copy of 

this information collection request (ICR) 

submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web 

page http://reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the 

web page called ‘‘Currently Under 

Review’’, (3) click on the downwardpointing arrow in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ 

box below the ‘‘Currently Under 

Review’’ heading, (4) select ‘‘Federal 

Communications Commission’’ from the 

list of agencies presented in the ‘‘Select 

Agency’’ box, (5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ 

button to the right of the ‘‘Select 

Agency’’ box, and (6) when the list of 

FCC ICRs currently under review 

appears, look for the title of this ICR (or 

its OMB Control Number, if there is one) 

and then click on the ICR Reference 

Number to view detailed information 

about this ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection(s), contact Judith 

B. Herman at 202–418–0214 or via the 

Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0636. 

Title: Sections 2.906, 2.909, 2.1071, 

2.1075, 2.1076, and 15.37, Equipment 

Authorizations—Declaration of 

Conformity. 

Form No.: Not applicable. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit. 

Number of Respondents: 4,000 

respondents; 8,000 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 18 

hours (average). 

Frequency of Response: One-time 

reporting requirement, recordkeeping 

requirement and third party disclosure 

requirements. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in 47 U.S.C. sections 154(i), 

301, 302, 303(e), 303(r), 304 and 307. 

Total Annual Burden: 76,000 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $12,000,000. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

No assurances of confidentiality are 

provided to respondents. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

requesting an extension of this 

information collection in order to obtain 

the full three year clearance from the 

OMB. There is no change in the 

reporting, recordkeeping and/or third 

party disclosure requirements since this 

was last submitted to OMB in 2006. 

There is no change in the estimated 

respondents/responses, burden hours 

and/or annual costs. In 1996, the 

Declaration of Conformity (DoC) 

procedure was established in a Report 

and Order, FCC 96–208, In the Matter of 

Amendment of Parts 2 and 15 of the 

Commission’s Rules to Deregulate the 

Equipment Authorization Requirements 

for Digital Devices. 

(a) The Declaration of Conformity 

equipment authorization procedure, 47 

CFR 2.1071, requires that a 

manufacturer or equipment supplier test 

a product to ensure compliance with 

technical standards that limit radio 

frequency emissions. 

(b) Additionally, the manufacturer or 

supplier must also include a DoC (with 

the standards) in the literature furnished 

with the equipment, and the equipment 

manufacturer or supplier must also 

make this statement of conformity and 

supporting technical data available to 

the FCC, at the Commission’s request. 

(c) The DoC procedure represents a 

simplified filing and reporting 

procedure for authorizing equipment for 

marketing. 

(d) Finally, testing and documentation 

of compliance are needed to control 

potential interference to radio 

communications. The data gathering are 

necessary for investigating complaints 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES