# Official Journal L 318/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 318 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6512 December 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 318

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6512 December 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2022/2417 of 26 July 2022 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the carriage of freight by road | 1 |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2418 of 9 December 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 as regards the methods for analysis for the control of the levels of trace elements and processing contaminants in foodstuffs (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2022/2419 of the European Central Bank of 6 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/378 on the application of minimum reserve requirements (ECB/2021/1) (ECB/2022/43) | 7 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2420 of 1 December 2022 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2022) 8991)

   (
  1
  ) | 9 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2421 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8733)

   (
  1
  ) | 96 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2422 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Cyprus pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8719)

   (
  1
  ) | 107 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2423 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8716)

   (
  1
  ) | 116 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2424 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8740)

   (
  1
  ) | 126 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2425 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8743)

   (
  1
  ) | 136 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2426 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8718)

   (
  1
  ) | 147 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2427 of 6 December 2022 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions, for common waste gas management and treatment systems in the chemical sector
  (notified under document C(2022) 8788)

   (
  1
  ) | 157 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2022/2417 of 26 July 2022 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the carriage of freight by road

1

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2418 of 9 December 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 as regards the methods for analysis for the control of the levels of trace elements and processing contaminants in foodstuffs (
  1
  )

1

4

*

Regulation (EU) 2022/2419 of the European Central Bank of 6 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/378 on the application of minimum reserve requirements (ECB/2021/1) (ECB/2022/43)

(ECB/2022/43)

7

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2420 of 1 December 2022 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2022) 8991)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 8991)

1

9

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2421 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8733)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 8733)

1

96

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2422 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Cyprus pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8719)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 8719)

1

107

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2423 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8716)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 8716)

1

116

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2424 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8740)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 8740)

1

126

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2425 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8743)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 8743)

1

136

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/2426 of 5 December 2022 on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period
  (notified under document C(2022) 8718)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 8718)

1

147

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2427 of 6 December 2022 establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions, for common waste gas management and treatment systems in the chemical sector
  (notified under document C(2022) 8788)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2022) 8788)

1

157

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/2417

of 26 July 2022

on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the carriage of freight by road

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2022/1165 (2) the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the carriage of freight by road (the ‘Agreement’) was signed on 29 June 2022, subject to its conclusion at a later date. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2022/1165 (2) the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the carriage of freight by road (the ‘Agreement’) was signed on 29 June 2022, subject to its conclusion at a later date.

| (2) | In view of the important disruptions in the transport sector in the Republic of Moldova caused by the war of aggression undertaken by Russia against Ukraine, it is necessary for operators from the Republic of Moldova to find alternative transit routes by road through the European Union and to find new markets to export their goods. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the important disruptions in the transport sector in the Republic of Moldova caused by the war of aggression undertaken by Russia against Ukraine, it is necessary for operators from the Republic of Moldova to find alternative transit routes by road through the European Union and to find new markets to export their goods.

| (3) | Given that permits granted in the framework of the European Conference of Ministers of Transport multilateral quota system within the International Transport Forum and existing bilateral agreements with the Republic of Moldova do not allow for the necessary flexibility for road haulage operators from the Republic of Moldova to plan ahead for and increase their operations through and with the Union, it is crucial to liberalise the transport of freight by road for bilateral operations as well as for transit. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Given that permits granted in the framework of the European Conference of Ministers of Transport multilateral quota system within the International Transport Forum and existing bilateral agreements with the Republic of Moldova do not allow for the necessary flexibility for road haulage operators from the Republic of Moldova to plan ahead for and increase their operations through and with the Union, it is crucial to liberalise the transport of freight by road for bilateral operations as well as for transit.

| (4) | In view of the exceptional and unique circumstances that necessitate the signature, provisional application and conclusion of the Agreement, and in accordance with the Treaties, it is appropriate for the Union to exercise temporarily the relevant shared competence conferred upon it by the Treaties. Any effect of this Decision on the division of competences between the Union and the Member States should be strictly limited in time. The competence exercised by the Union on the basis of this Decision and of the Agreement should therefore only be exercised with respect to the period of application of the Agreement. Accordingly, the shared competence thus exercised will cease to be exercised by the Union as soon as the Agreement ceases to apply. Without prejudice to other Union measures, and subject to compliance with those Union measures, that competence will, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), again be exercised by the Member States thereafter. Furthermore, it is recalled that, as set out in Protocol No 25 on the exercise of shared competence annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the TFEU, the scope of the exercise of the competence of the Union in this Decision covers only those elements governed by this Decision and the Agreement and does not cover the whole area. The exercise of Union competence by this Decision is without prejudice to the respective competences of the Union and of the Member States in relation to any ongoing or future negotiations for, or signature or conclusion of, international agreements with any other third country in that area. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In view of the exceptional and unique circumstances that necessitate the signature, provisional application and conclusion of the Agreement, and in accordance with the Treaties, it is appropriate for the Union to exercise temporarily the relevant shared competence conferred upon it by the Treaties. Any effect of this Decision on the division of competences between the Union and the Member States should be strictly limited in time. The competence exercised by the Union on the basis of this Decision and of the Agreement should therefore only be exercised with respect to the period of application of the Agreement. Accordingly, the shared competence thus exercised will cease to be exercised by the Union as soon as the Agreement ceases to apply. Without prejudice to other Union measures, and subject to compliance with those Union measures, that competence will, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), again be exercised by the Member States thereafter. Furthermore, it is recalled that, as set out in Protocol No 25 on the exercise of shared competence annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the TFEU, the scope of the exercise of the competence of the Union in this Decision covers only those elements governed by this Decision and the Agreement and does not cover the whole area. The exercise of Union competence by this Decision is without prejudice to the respective competences of the Union and of the Member States in relation to any ongoing or future negotiations for, or signature or conclusion of, international agreements with any other third country in that area.

| (5) | The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the Union, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the carriage of freight by road is hereby approved on behalf of the Union (3).

Article 2

1.   The exercise of Union competence pursuant to this Decision and the Agreement shall be limited to the period of application of the Agreement. Without prejudice to other Union measures, and subject to compliance with those Union measures, after the end of that period of application the Union shall immediately cease to exercise that competence and the Member States shall again exercise their competence in accordance with Article 2(2) TFEU.

2.   The exercise of Union competence pursuant to this Decision and the Agreement shall be without prejudice to the competence of the Member States concerning any ongoing or future negotiations for, or signature or conclusion of, international agreements related to the carriage of goods by road with any other third country, and with the Republic of Moldova with respect to the period after the Agreement has ceased to apply.

3.   The exercise of the competence by the Union referred to in paragraph 1 covers only the elements governed by this Decision and the Agreement.

4.   This Decision and the Agreement are without prejudice to the respective competences of the Union and the Member States in the area of carriage of goods by road with regard to elements other than those governed by this Decision and the Agreement.

Article 3

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 12 of the Agreement.

Article 4

The European Commission, assisted by the representatives of the Member States as observers, shall represent the Union within the Joint Committee set up pursuant to Article 6 of the Agreement.

Article 5

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2022.

For the Council

The President

M. KUPKA

---

(1)  Consent of 10 November 2022 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2022/1165 of 27 June 2022 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the carriage of freight by road (OJ L 181, 7.7.2022, p. 1).

2

(3)  The text of the Agreement is published in OJ L 181, 7.7.2022, p. 4.

3

---

REGULATIONS

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2022/2418

of 9 December 2022

amending Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 as regards the methods for analysis for the control of the levels of trace elements and processing contaminants in foodstuffs

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1069/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 1151/2012, (EU) No 652/2014, (EU) 2016/429 and (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 1/2005 and (EC) No 1099/2009 and Council Directives 98/58/EC, 1999/74/EC, 2007/43/EC, 2008/119/EC and 2008/120/EC, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 89/608/EEC, 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 96/23/EC, 96/93/EC and 97/78/EC and Council Decision 92/438/EEC (Official Controls Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 34(6) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 (2) lays down the methods of sampling and analysis to be used for the official control of the levels of trace elements and processing contaminants in foodstuffs. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 (2) lays down the methods of sampling and analysis to be used for the official control of the levels of trace elements and processing contaminants in foodstuffs.

| (2) | On the basis of the best available scientific information, the European Union Reference Laboratories in the field of contaminants in feed and food have elaborated a Guidance Document on the estimation of the Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for measurements in the field of contaminants in feed and food (3). As this Guidance Document contains the best up to date technological knowledge, its conclusions should be reflected in the requirements for LOQs for analytical methods for arsenic set out in Regulation (EC) No 333/2007. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of the best available scientific information, the European Union Reference Laboratories in the field of contaminants in feed and food have elaborated a Guidance Document on the estimation of the Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for measurements in the field of contaminants in feed and food (3). As this Guidance Document contains the best up to date technological knowledge, its conclusions should be reflected in the requirements for LOQs for analytical methods for arsenic set out in Regulation (EC) No 333/2007.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 95, 7.4.2017, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 of 28 March 2007 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the control of the levels of trace elements and processing contaminants in foodstuffs (OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p. 29).

2

(3)  Wenzl, T., Haedrich, J., Schaechtele, A., Robouch, P., Stroka, J., Guidance Document on the Estimation of LOD and LOQ for Measurements in the Field of Contaminants in Feed and Food; EUR 28099, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2016, ISBN 978-92-79-61768-3; doi:10.2787/8931.

3

Guidance Document on the Estimation of LOD and LOQ for Measurements in the Field of Contaminants in Feed and Food

---

ANNEX

In point C.3.3.1. of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 333/2007, point (a) is replaced by the following:

| ‘(a) | Performance criteria for methods of analysis for lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin and inorganic arsenic

  Table 5










  Parameter | Criterion |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Applicability | Foods specified in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 |
| Specificity | Free from matrix or spectral interferences |
| Repeatability (RSDr) | HORRATr less than 2 |
| Reproducibility (RSDR) | HORRATR less than 2 |
| Recovery | The provisions of point D.1.2. apply |
| LOD | = three tenths of LOQ |
| LOQ | Inorganic tin | ≤ 10 mg/kg |
| Lead | ML ≤ 0,02 mg/kg | 0,02 < ML < 0,1 mg/kg | ML ≥ 0,1 mg/kg |
| ≤ ML | ≤ two thirds of the ML | ≤ one fifth of the ML |
| Cadmium, mercury | ML ≤ 0,02 mg/kg | 0,02 < ML < 0,1 mg/kg | ML is ≥ 0,1 mg/kg |
| ≤ two fifths of the ML | ≤ two fifths of the ML | ≤ one fifth of the ML |
| Inorganic arsenic and total arsenic | ML ≤ 0,03 mg/kg | 0,03 < ML < 0,1 mg/kg | ML is ≥ 0,1 mg/kg |
| ≤ ML | ≤ two thirds of the ML | ≤ two thirds of the ML’ |

‘(a)

Performance criteria for methods of analysis for lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin and inorganic arsenic

Table 5

Parameter

Criterion

Applicability

Foods specified in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006

Specificity

Free from matrix or spectral interferences

Repeatability (RSDr)

HORRATr less than 2

Reproducibility (RSDR)

HORRATR less than 2

Recovery

The provisions of point D.1.2. apply

LOD

= three tenths of LOQ

LOQ

Inorganic tin

≤ 10 mg/kg

Lead

ML ≤ 0,02 mg/kg

0,02 < ML < 0,1 mg/kg

ML ≥ 0,1 mg/kg

≤ ML

≤ two thirds of the ML

≤ one fifth of the ML

Cadmium, mercury

ML ≤ 0,02 mg/kg

0,02 < ML < 0,1 mg/kg

ML is ≥ 0,1 mg/kg

≤ two fifths of the ML

≤ two fifths of the ML

≤ one fifth of the ML

Inorganic arsenic and total arsenic

ML ≤ 0,03 mg/kg

0,03 < ML < 0,1 mg/kg

ML is ≥ 0,1 mg/kg

≤ ML

≤ two thirds of the ML

≤ two thirds of the ML’

---

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/7

---

REGULATION (EU) 2022/2419 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 6 December 2022

amending Regulation (EU) 2021/378 on the application of minimum reserve requirements (ECB/2021/1) (ECB/2022/43)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular to Article 19(1) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2531/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the application of minimum reserves by the European Central Bank (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Minimum reserves have until now been remunerated at the European Central Bank’s (ECB) main refinancing operations rate. In order to align the minimum reserves remuneration more closely with money market conditions, the Governing Council decided on 27 October 2022 to set such remuneration at the Eurosystem’s deposit facility rate (DFR). Under the prevailing market and liquidity conditions, the DFR better reflects the rate at which funds may be invested in money market instruments if not held as minimum reserves and the rate at which banks may borrow funds in the money market to fulfil minimum reserves. The change in the remuneration of minimum reserves seeks to ensure that the Eurosystem minimum reserves system neither puts a burden on the banking system in the euro area, nor hinders the efficient allocation of resources. In order to ensure an effective transition, the remuneration change should be aligned with the beginning of the maintenance period, starting on 21 December 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Minimum reserves have until now been remunerated at the European Central Bank’s (ECB) main refinancing operations rate. In order to align the minimum reserves remuneration more closely with money market conditions, the Governing Council decided on 27 October 2022 to set such remuneration at the Eurosystem’s deposit facility rate (DFR). Under the prevailing market and liquidity conditions, the DFR better reflects the rate at which funds may be invested in money market instruments if not held as minimum reserves and the rate at which banks may borrow funds in the money market to fulfil minimum reserves. The change in the remuneration of minimum reserves seeks to ensure that the Eurosystem minimum reserves system neither puts a burden on the banking system in the euro area, nor hinders the efficient allocation of resources. In order to ensure an effective transition, the remuneration change should be aligned with the beginning of the maintenance period, starting on 21 December 2022.

| (2) | To ensure legal clarity and transparency, as a follow-up to the Governing Council’s decision on 17 February 2022 to review the remuneration of non-monetary policy deposits at Eurosystem level, it is appropriate to also define the remuneration treatment of funds initially included in holdings of minimum reserves that are subsequently considered to fulfil the conditions of Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2021/378 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2021/1) (2), and thus are excluded from an institution’s reserve holdings under that act. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To ensure legal clarity and transparency, as a follow-up to the Governing Council’s decision on 17 February 2022 to review the remuneration of non-monetary policy deposits at Eurosystem level, it is appropriate to also define the remuneration treatment of funds initially included in holdings of minimum reserves that are subsequently considered to fulfil the conditions of Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2021/378 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2021/1) (2), and thus are excluded from an institution’s reserve holdings under that act.

| (3) | This Regulation should apply from 21 December 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This Regulation should apply from 21 December 2022.

| (4) | Therefore, Regulation (EU) 2021/378 (ECB/2021/1) should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Therefore, Regulation (EU) 2021/378 (ECB/2021/1) should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Amendment

Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2021/378 (ECB/2021/1) is replaced by the following:

‘Article 9

Remuneration

1.   The relevant NCB shall remunerate holdings of minimum reserves in the reserve accounts at the average, taken over the maintenance period, of the Eurosystem’s deposit facility rate (weighted according to the number of calendar days) according to the following formula (whereby the result is rounded to the nearest cent):

Image 1

Formula

Where:

| Rt | = | remuneration to be paid on holdings of minimum reserves for the maintenance period t; |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Ht | = | average daily holdings of minimum reserves for the maintenance period t; |
| nt | = | number of calendar days in the maintenance period t; |
| rt | = | rate of remuneration on holdings of minimum reserves for the maintenance period t; standard rounding of the rate of remuneration to two decimals shall be applied; |
| i | = | ith calendar day of the maintenance period t; |
| DFRi | = | the deposit facility rate on each day i of the maintenance period. |

Rt

=

remuneration to be paid on holdings of minimum reserves for the maintenance period t;

Ht

=

average daily holdings of minimum reserves for the maintenance period t;

nt

=

number of calendar days in the maintenance period t;

rt

=

rate of remuneration on holdings of minimum reserves for the maintenance period t; standard rounding of the rate of remuneration to two decimals shall be applied;

i

=

ith calendar day of the maintenance period t;

DFRi

=

the deposit facility rate on each day i of the maintenance period.

2.   The relevant NCB shall pay the remuneration on the holdings of minimum reserves on the second TARGET2 business day following the end of the maintenance period over which the remuneration was earned.

3.   Funds included in holdings of minimum reserves that are subsequently excluded from those minimum reserves pursuant to Article 3(1)(d) shall be remunerated by the relevant NCB in accordance with the rules applicable to non-monetary policy deposits in Guideline (EU) 2019/671 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/7) (*1), with effect from the date the specific condition of Article 3(1)(d) applies, as determined by the relevant NCB.

Article 2

Final provisions

This Regulation shall enter into force on the fifth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall apply from 21 December 2022.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 6 December 2022.

For the Governing Council of the ECB

The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 27.11.1998, p. 1.

1

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2021/378 of the European Central Bank of 22 January 2021 on the application of minimum reserve requirements (ECB/2021/1) (OJ L 73, 3.3.2021, p. 1).

2

---

DECISIONS

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/9

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2022/2420

of 1 December 2022

amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States

(notified under document C(2022) 8991)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (1), and in particular Article 259(1), point (c), thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an infectious viral disease in birds and may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries. HPAI viruses can infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations. Therefore, the presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into establishments where poultry or captive birds are kept. In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other establishments where poultry or captive birds are kept. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an infectious viral disease in birds and may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming causing disturbance to trade within the Union and exports to third countries. HPAI viruses can infect migratory birds, which can then spread these viruses over long distances during their autumn and spring migrations. Therefore, the presence of HPAI viruses in wild birds poses a continuous threat for the direct and indirect introduction of these viruses into establishments where poultry or captive birds are kept. In the event of an outbreak of HPAI, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other establishments where poultry or captive birds are kept.

| (2) | Regulation (EU) 2016/429 establishes a new legislative framework for the prevention and control of diseases that are transmissible to animals or humans. HPAI falls within the definition of a listed disease in that Regulation, and it is subject to the disease prevention and control rules laid down therein. In addition, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 (2) supplements Regulation (EU) 2016/429 as regards the rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases, including disease control measures for HPAI. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EU) 2016/429 establishes a new legislative framework for the prevention and control of diseases that are transmissible to animals or humans. HPAI falls within the definition of a listed disease in that Regulation, and it is subject to the disease prevention and control rules laid down therein. In addition, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 (2) supplements Regulation (EU) 2016/429 as regards the rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases, including disease control measures for HPAI.

| (3) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 (3) was adopted within the framework of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and it lays down emergency measures at Union level in relation to outbreaks of HPAI. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 (3) was adopted within the framework of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 and it lays down emergency measures at Union level in relation to outbreaks of HPAI.

| (4) | More particularly, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 provides that the protection, surveillance and further restricted zones established by the Member States following outbreaks of HPAI, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection, surveillance and further restricted zones in the Annex to that Implementing Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

More particularly, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 provides that the protection, surveillance and further restricted zones established by the Member States following outbreaks of HPAI, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection, surveillance and further restricted zones in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.

| (5) | The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 was recently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2322 (4) following outbreaks of HPAI in poultry or captive birds in Belgium, Germany, Ireland, France, Croatia, Italy, Hungary and the Netherlands that needed to be reflected in that Annex. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 was recently amended by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2322 (4) following outbreaks of HPAI in poultry or captive birds in Belgium, Germany, Ireland, France, Croatia, Italy, Hungary and the Netherlands that needed to be reflected in that Annex.

| (6) | Since the date of adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2322, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary and the Netherlands have notified the Commission of further outbreaks of HPAI in establishments where poultry or captive birds were kept, located in the Monaghan County in Ireland, in the Bretagne, Centre-Val de Loire, Hauts-de-France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie and Pays de la Loire administrative regions in France, in the Emilia-Romagna and Lombardy Regions in Italy, in the Bács-Kiskun, Békés and Csongrád-Csanád Counties in Hungary and in the Friesland, Zuid-Holland and Limburg Provinces in the Netherlands. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Since the date of adoption of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2322, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary and the Netherlands have notified the Commission of further outbreaks of HPAI in establishments where poultry or captive birds were kept, located in the Monaghan County in Ireland, in the Bretagne, Centre-Val de Loire, Hauts-de-France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie and Pays de la Loire administrative regions in France, in the Emilia-Romagna and Lombardy Regions in Italy, in the Bács-Kiskun, Békés and Csongrád-Csanád Counties in Hungary and in the Friesland, Zuid-Holland and Limburg Provinces in the Netherlands.

| (7) | The competent authorities of Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary and the Netherlands have taken the necessary disease control measures required in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around those outbreaks. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The competent authorities of Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary and the Netherlands have taken the necessary disease control measures required in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around those outbreaks.

| (8) | In addition, the competent authority of France decided to establish further restricted zones in addition to the protection and surveillance zones established for certain outbreaks located in that Member State. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In addition, the competent authority of France decided to establish further restricted zones in addition to the protection and surveillance zones established for certain outbreaks located in that Member State.

| (9) | Moreover, one outbreak confirmed in the Netherlands is located in close proximity to the border with Germany. Accordingly, the competent authorities of these Member States have duly collaborated with regard to the establishment of the necessary surveillance zone, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, as the surveillance zone extends into the territory of Germany. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Moreover, one outbreak confirmed in the Netherlands is located in close proximity to the border with Germany. Accordingly, the competent authorities of these Member States have duly collaborated with regard to the establishment of the necessary surveillance zone, in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, as the surveillance zone extends into the territory of Germany.

| (10) | Furthermore, the outbreak confirmed in Ireland is again located in close proximity to the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland. In accordance with the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (‘Withdrawal Agreement’), and in particular Article 5(4) of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland in conjunction with Annex 2 to that Protocol, Regulation (EU) 2016/429, as well as the Commission acts based on it, apply to and in the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland after the end of the transition period provided for in the Withdrawal Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Furthermore, the outbreak confirmed in Ireland is again located in close proximity to the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland. In accordance with the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (‘Withdrawal Agreement’), and in particular Article 5(4) of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland in conjunction with Annex 2 to that Protocol, Regulation (EU) 2016/429, as well as the Commission acts based on it, apply to and in the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland after the end of the transition period provided for in the Withdrawal Agreement.

| (11) | Consequently, the emergency measures laid down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 apply in the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland. Therefore, the competent authorities of Ireland and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland have duly collaborated with regard to the establishment of the necessary protection and surveillance zones in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, as the protection and surveillance zones related to the outbreak confirmed in Ireland extend into the territory of the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Consequently, the emergency measures laid down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 apply in the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland. Therefore, the competent authorities of Ireland and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland have duly collaborated with regard to the establishment of the necessary protection and surveillance zones in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, as the protection and surveillance zones related to the outbreak confirmed in Ireland extend into the territory of the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland.

| (12) | The Commission has examined the disease control measures taken by Germany, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, in collaboration with those Member States and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, and it is satisfied that the boundaries of the protection and surveillances zones in Germany, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands and in the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, established by the competent authority of those Member States and of the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland are at a sufficient distance from the establishments where the outbreaks of HPAI have been confirmed. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The Commission has examined the disease control measures taken by Germany, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, in collaboration with those Member States and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, and it is satisfied that the boundaries of the protection and surveillances zones in Germany, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands and in the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, established by the competent authority of those Member States and of the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland are at a sufficient distance from the establishments where the outbreaks of HPAI have been confirmed.

| (13) | In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe at Union level, in collaboration with Germany, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, the protection and surveillance zones duly established by these Member States and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, as well as the further restricted zones established by France. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe at Union level, in collaboration with Germany, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, the protection and surveillance zones duly established by these Member States and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, as well as the further restricted zones established by France.

| (14) | Therefore, the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones for Germany, Ireland, France, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands and for the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, as well as the areas listed as further restricted zones for France in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 should be amended. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Therefore, the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones for Germany, Ireland, France, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands and for the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, as well as the areas listed as further restricted zones for France in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 should be amended.

| (15) | Accordingly, the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 should be amended to update regionalisation at Union level to take account of the protection and surveillance zones duly established by Germany, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, and of the further restricted zones established by France in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, and the duration of the measures applicable therein. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Accordingly, the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 should be amended to update regionalisation at Union level to take account of the protection and surveillance zones duly established by Germany, Ireland, France, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland, and of the further restricted zones established by France in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687, and the duration of the measures applicable therein.

| (16) | Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (17) | Given the urgency of the epidemiological situation in the Union as regards the spread of HPAI, it is important that the amendments to be made to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 by this Decision take effect as soon as possible. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

Given the urgency of the epidemiological situation in the Union as regards the spread of HPAI, it is important that the amendments to be made to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 by this Decision take effect as soon as possible.

| (18) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 December 2022.

For the Commission

Stella KYRIAKIDES

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 84, 31.3.2016, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 of 17 December 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases (OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 64).

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 of 16 April 2021 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (OJ L 134, 20.4.2021, p. 166).

3

(4)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2322 of 21 November 2022 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/641 concerning emergency measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (OJ L 307, 28.11.2022, p. 164).

4

---

ANNEX

‘ANNEX

Part A

Protection zones in the concerned Member States* as referred to in Articles 1 and 2:

Member State: Belgium

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BE-HPAI(P)-2022-00010 | Those parts of the municipalities Kasterlee, Lille, Turnhout and Vosselaar contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4,930419, lat 51,27616. | 30.11.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

BE-HPAI(P)-2022-00010

Those parts of the municipalities Kasterlee, Lille, Turnhout and Vosselaar contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4,930419, lat 51,27616.

30.11.2022

Member State: Denmark

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| DK-HPAI(P)-2022-00006 | The parts of Slagelse municipality that are contained within a circle of radius 3 km, centered on GPS coordinates
  N 55,2347; E 11,3952 | 5.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

DK-HPAI(P)-2022-00006

The parts of Slagelse municipality that are contained within a circle of radius 3 km, centered on GPS coordinates

N 55,2347; E 11,3952

5.12.2022

Member State: Germany

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BAYERN |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00088 | Landkreis Landshut

  3 km um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten
  12,469717/48,465004
  Betroffen sind Gemeinden oder Teile der Gemeinden Aham Bodenkirchen Schalkham | 3.12.2022 |
| Landkreis Rottal-Inn

  3 km um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten
  12,469717/48,465004
  Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Gangkofen. | 3.12.2022 |
| HESSEN |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00086 | Landkreis Gießen

  3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Hungen | 30.11.2022 |
| Wetteraukreis

  3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Wölfersheim, Echzell und Nidda | 30.11.2022 |
| NIEDERSACHSEN |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00089 | Landkreis Aurich

  3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS-Koordinaten
  7.649228/53.428679
  Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Großefehn und Wiesmoor | 8.12.2022 |
| NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00084 | Oberbergischer Kreis

  3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.685763/50.834267)
  Betroffen sind Teile:






  — | des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Gemeinde Morsbach |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

BAYERN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00088

Landkreis Landshut

3 km um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten

12,469717/48,465004

Betroffen sind Gemeinden oder Teile der Gemeinden Aham Bodenkirchen Schalkham

3.12.2022

Landkreis Rottal-Inn

3 km um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten

12,469717/48,465004

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Gangkofen.

3.12.2022

HESSEN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00086

Landkreis Gießen

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Hungen

30.11.2022

Wetteraukreis

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Wölfersheim, Echzell und Nidda

30.11.2022

NIEDERSACHSEN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00089

Landkreis Aurich

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS-Koordinaten

7.649228/53.428679

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Großefehn und Wiesmoor

8.12.2022

NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00084

Oberbergischer Kreis

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.685763/50.834267)

Betroffen sind Teile:

—

des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Gemeinde Morsbach

29.11.2022

RHEINLAND-PFALZ

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00084

DE-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-01219

Kreis Altenkirchen

Union der 3 km-Radien um die Ausbruchsbetriebe mit den GPS Koordinaten:

| | 7.685763/50.834267 |
| --- | --- |

7.685763/50.834267

| | 7.640940/50.800340 |
| --- | --- |

7.640940/50.800340

Betroffen sind die Stadt Wissen und die Ortsgemeinde Birken-Honigsessen, jeweils ausserhalb der Ortslage Richtung Kreisgrenze zu NRW sowie die Ortsgemeinden Forst und Fürthen

15.12.2022

SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00083

Kreis Rendsburg-Eckernförde

3 km Radius um Primär-Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten 9,799269/54,237815

Teile der Gemeinden Emkendorf, Bokel und Groß Vollstedt

1.12.2022

Member State: Ireland

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00001
  IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00003 | That part of the County of Monaghan) that comprises the townlands of Largy, lying partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural and partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Urban, Aghafin, Atartate Glebe, Burdautien, Carney’s Island, Carrivatragh, Cavan, Clonkirk, Clonkee (Cole), Corraghy, Creevaghy, Drumard, Edenaforan, Gortnawhinny, Legnakelly, Leonard’s Island, Liseggerton, Lisnaroe Near, Lisoarty, Longfield, Magheramore, Mullanacloy, Shanamullen South, Tanderagee, Tirnahinch Near, Tirnahinch Far, all in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural, and Carrickmore and Drumadagory, all in the Electoral Division of St. Tierney
  That part of the County of Monaghan) that comprises the townlands of Largy, lying partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural and partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Urban, Aghafin, Altartate Glebe, Burdautien, Carney’s Island, Carrivatragh, Cavan, Clonkirk, Clonkeen (Cole), Corraghy, Creevaghy, Drumard, Edenaforan, Gortnawhinny, Legnakelly, Leonard’s Island, Liseggerton, Lisnaroe Near, Lisoarty, Longfield, Magheranure, Mullanacloy, Shanamullen South, Tanderagee, Tirnahinch Near, Tirnahinch Far, all in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural, and Carrickmore, Drumadagory and Drumaddarainy, all in the Electoral Division of St. Tierney | 13.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00001

IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00003

That part of the County of Monaghan) that comprises the townlands of Largy, lying partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural and partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Urban, Aghafin, Atartate Glebe, Burdautien, Carney’s Island, Carrivatragh, Cavan, Clonkirk, Clonkee (Cole), Corraghy, Creevaghy, Drumard, Edenaforan, Gortnawhinny, Legnakelly, Leonard’s Island, Liseggerton, Lisnaroe Near, Lisoarty, Longfield, Magheramore, Mullanacloy, Shanamullen South, Tanderagee, Tirnahinch Near, Tirnahinch Far, all in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural, and Carrickmore and Drumadagory, all in the Electoral Division of St. Tierney

That part of the County of Monaghan) that comprises the townlands of Largy, lying partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural and partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Urban, Aghafin, Altartate Glebe, Burdautien, Carney’s Island, Carrivatragh, Cavan, Clonkirk, Clonkeen (Cole), Corraghy, Creevaghy, Drumard, Edenaforan, Gortnawhinny, Legnakelly, Leonard’s Island, Liseggerton, Lisnaroe Near, Lisoarty, Longfield, Magheranure, Mullanacloy, Shanamullen South, Tanderagee, Tirnahinch Near, Tirnahinch Far, all in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural, and Carrickmore, Drumadagory and Drumaddarainy, all in the Electoral Division of St. Tierney

13.12.2022

Member State: France

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Département: Côtes-d’Armor (22) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01419
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01425 | CALORGUEN
  EVRAN
  LE QUIOU
  SAINT-ANDRE-DES-EAUX
  SAINT-JUVAT
  SAINT-MADEN
  TREFUMEL
  TREVRON | 8.12.2022 |
| Département: Eure (27) |
| FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00354 | LA HAYE-SAINT-SYLVESTRE
  MELICOURT
  MESNIL-ROUSSET
  NOTRE-DAME-DU-HAMEL
  SAINT-PIERRE-DE-CERNIERES | 7.12.2022 |
| Département: Finistère (29) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01421
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01429 | HENVIC
  TAULE | 7.12.2022 |
| Département: Ille-et-Vilaine (35) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01418 | RANNEE à l’est de la D95 et au sud des lignes de la belle etoile | 30.11.2022 |
| Département: Indre (36) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01412 | AIZE: Sud de D31 et route entre Moulin Bailly et Aize
  BUXEUIL: Sud de D960
  ROUVRES LES BOIS | 30.11.2022 |
| Département: Landes (40) |
| FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00391 | LEON
  SAINT-MICHEL-ESCALUS | 16.12.2022 |
| Département: Loiret (45) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01407
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01420
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01432 | AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD
  CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  CHÂTENOY
  COUDROY
  AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD
  CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  CHÂTENOY
  COUDROY
  NOYERS
  AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD
  CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  CHÂTENOY
  COUDROY
  NOYERS | 10.12.2022 |
| Département: Mayenne (53) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01418 | BRAINS-SUR-LES-MARCHES
  FONTAINE-COUVERTE
  LA ROUAUDIERE
  SAINT-AIGNAN-SUR-ROE
  SAINT-MICHEL-DE-LA-ROE | 30.11.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01431 | ASSE-LE-BERENGER
  EVRON
  SAINTE-GEMMES-LE-ROBERT
  SAINT-GEORGES-SUR-ERVE | 7.12.2022 |
| Département: Morbihan (56) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01422
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01435 | EVELLYS -Partie de la commune à l’est de la D767 jusqu’à Siviac puis à l’est de la route allant à Naizin puis au sud de la D203
  MOREAC – Partie de la commune à l’est de la D767 jusqu’à Porh Legal puis au nord de la D181 jusqu’à Keranna puis au nord de la route allant de Keranna à Kervalo en passant par Le Petit Kerimars, Bolcalpère et le Faouët d’En Haut
  REGUINY – Partie de la commune au sud de la D203 jusqu’à Le Pont Saint Fiacre
  RADENAC -Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D11 | 13.12.2022 |
| Département: Nord (59) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01423 | NEUF-BERQUIN
  STEENWERCK
  ESTAIRES
  LE DOULIEU | 8.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01434 | NEUF-BERQUIN
  STEENWERCK
  ESTAIRES
  LE DOULIEU
  AUBERS
  HERLIES
  ILLIES | 11.12.2022 |
| Département: Pas-de Calais (62) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01427 | ALLOUAGNE
  BURBURE
  CHOQUES
  GONNEHEM
  LABEUVRIERE
  LAPUGNOY
  LILLERS
  LOZINGHEM | 10.12.2022 |
| Département: Deux – Sèvres (79) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397 | COULONGES-SUR-L’AUTIZE
  SAINT-MAIXENT-DE-BEUGNE | 29.11.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01411
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01415
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01414
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01417
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01430
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01436
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01428 | L’ABSIE
  LE BUSSEAU
  CHANTELOUP
  LA CHAPELLE-SAINT-ETIENNE
  COULONGES-SUR-L’AUTIZE
  LARGEASSE
  SAINT-MAIXENT-DE-BEUGNE
  SAINT-PAUL-EN-GATINE
  TRAYES
  VERNOUX-EN-GATINE | 11.12.2022 |
| Département: Somme (80) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01437 | AMIENS
  BOVES
  CAGNY
  DURY
  SAINS-EN-AMIENOIS
  SAINT-FUSCIEN | 12.12.2022 |
| Département: Tarn (81) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01433 | ALBI
  CARLUS
  CASTELNAU-DE-LEVIS
  MARSSAC-SUR-TARN
  ROUFFIAC
  LE SEQUESTRE
  TERSSAC | 11.12.2022 |
| Département: Vendée (85) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01408 | SAINT HILAIRE DES LOGES au nord de la D745
  L’ORBRIE
  MERVENT
  SAINT-MICHEL-LE-CLOUCQ
  FOUSSAIS PAYRE à l’est de la D49 | 18.11.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01409 | CHAMPAGNE-LES-MARAIS
  LUCON
  MOREILLES
  PUYRAVAULT
  SAINTE-DEMME-LA-PLAINE
  SAINTE-RADEGONDE-DES-NOYERS | 18.11.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01410 | BREUIL-BARRET
  LA CHAPELLE-AUX-LYS
  LOGE-FOUGEREUSE
  SAINT-HILAIRE-DE-VOUST | 22.11.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01416 | BREM-SUR-MER
  LANDEVIEILLE
  SAINT-JULIEN-DES-LANDES
  VAIRE | 27.11.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Département: Côtes-d’Armor (22)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01419

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01425

CALORGUEN

EVRAN

LE QUIOU

SAINT-ANDRE-DES-EAUX

SAINT-JUVAT

SAINT-MADEN

TREFUMEL

TREVRON

8.12.2022

Département: Eure (27)

FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00354

LA HAYE-SAINT-SYLVESTRE

MELICOURT

MESNIL-ROUSSET

NOTRE-DAME-DU-HAMEL

SAINT-PIERRE-DE-CERNIERES

7.12.2022

Département: Finistère (29)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01421

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01429

HENVIC

TAULE

7.12.2022

Département: Ille-et-Vilaine (35)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01418

RANNEE à l’est de la D95 et au sud des lignes de la belle etoile

30.11.2022

Département: Indre (36)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01412

AIZE: Sud de D31 et route entre Moulin Bailly et Aize

BUXEUIL: Sud de D960

ROUVRES LES BOIS

30.11.2022

Département: Landes (40)

FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00391

LEON

SAINT-MICHEL-ESCALUS

16.12.2022

Département: Loiret (45)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01407

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01420

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01432

AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS

BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD

CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS

CHÂTENOY

COUDROY

AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS

BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD

CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS

CHÂTENOY

COUDROY

NOYERS

AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS

BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD

CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS

CHÂTENOY

COUDROY

NOYERS

10.12.2022

Département: Mayenne (53)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01418

BRAINS-SUR-LES-MARCHES

FONTAINE-COUVERTE

LA ROUAUDIERE

SAINT-AIGNAN-SUR-ROE

SAINT-MICHEL-DE-LA-ROE

30.11.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01431

ASSE-LE-BERENGER

EVRON

SAINTE-GEMMES-LE-ROBERT

SAINT-GEORGES-SUR-ERVE

7.12.2022

Département: Morbihan (56)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01422

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01435

EVELLYS -Partie de la commune à l’est de la D767 jusqu’à Siviac puis à l’est de la route allant à Naizin puis au sud de la D203

MOREAC – Partie de la commune à l’est de la D767 jusqu’à Porh Legal puis au nord de la D181 jusqu’à Keranna puis au nord de la route allant de Keranna à Kervalo en passant par Le Petit Kerimars, Bolcalpère et le Faouët d’En Haut

REGUINY – Partie de la commune au sud de la D203 jusqu’à Le Pont Saint Fiacre

RADENAC -Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D11

13.12.2022

Département: Nord (59)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01423

NEUF-BERQUIN

STEENWERCK

ESTAIRES

LE DOULIEU

8.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01434

NEUF-BERQUIN

STEENWERCK

ESTAIRES

LE DOULIEU

AUBERS

HERLIES

ILLIES

11.12.2022

Département: Pas-de Calais (62)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01427

ALLOUAGNE

BURBURE

CHOQUES

GONNEHEM

LABEUVRIERE

LAPUGNOY

LILLERS

LOZINGHEM

10.12.2022

Département: Deux – Sèvres (79)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397

COULONGES-SUR-L’AUTIZE

SAINT-MAIXENT-DE-BEUGNE

29.11.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01411

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01415

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01414

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01417

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01430

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01436

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01428

L’ABSIE

LE BUSSEAU

CHANTELOUP

LA CHAPELLE-SAINT-ETIENNE

COULONGES-SUR-L’AUTIZE

LARGEASSE

SAINT-MAIXENT-DE-BEUGNE

SAINT-PAUL-EN-GATINE

TRAYES

VERNOUX-EN-GATINE

11.12.2022

Département: Somme (80)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01437

AMIENS

BOVES

CAGNY

DURY

SAINS-EN-AMIENOIS

SAINT-FUSCIEN

12.12.2022

Département: Tarn (81)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01433

ALBI

CARLUS

CASTELNAU-DE-LEVIS

MARSSAC-SUR-TARN

ROUFFIAC

LE SEQUESTRE

TERSSAC

11.12.2022

Département: Vendée (85)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01408

SAINT HILAIRE DES LOGES au nord de la D745

L’ORBRIE

MERVENT

SAINT-MICHEL-LE-CLOUCQ

FOUSSAIS PAYRE à l’est de la D49

18.11.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01409

CHAMPAGNE-LES-MARAIS

LUCON

MOREILLES

PUYRAVAULT

SAINTE-DEMME-LA-PLAINE

SAINTE-RADEGONDE-DES-NOYERS

18.11.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01410

BREUIL-BARRET

LA CHAPELLE-AUX-LYS

LOGE-FOUGEREUSE

SAINT-HILAIRE-DE-VOUST

22.11.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01416

BREM-SUR-MER

LANDEVIEILLE

SAINT-JULIEN-DES-LANDES

VAIRE

27.11.2022

Member State: Croatia

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grad Zagreb |
| HR-HPAI(P)-2022-00007 | — | gradske četvrti Brezovica i Novi Zagreb- zapad |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Grad Zagreb

HR-HPAI(P)-2022-00007

—

gradske četvrti Brezovica i Novi Zagreb- zapad

6.12.2022

Zagrebačka županija

HR-HPAI(P)-2022-00007

| — | općina Samobor, naselje Rakov potok; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Samobor, naselje Rakov potok;

| — | općina Stupnik, naselja Donji Stupnik, Gornji Stupnik i Stupnički Obrež; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Stupnik, naselja Donji Stupnik, Gornji Stupnik i Stupnički Obrež;

| — | općina Sveta Nedjelja, naselja Kalinovica, Kerestinec, Mala Gorica i Žitarka. |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Sveta Nedjelja, naselja Kalinovica, Kerestinec, Mala Gorica i Žitarka.

6.12.2022

Member State: Italy

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Region: Veneto |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00033 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.211179, E11.272346 | 29.11.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00034 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.221390806, E11.04331334 | 2.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00036 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.771464, E12.147417 | 29.11.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00037 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.741660, E12.452298 | 28.11.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00039 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.964074644, E12.282057809 | 6.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00040 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.233473, E11.657231 | 1.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00042 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.296865835, E10.878880005 | 4.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00043 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.504494974, E12.616275373 | 3.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00045 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.380764707, E11.07799142 | 10.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00047 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.966036, E12.305402 | 13.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00048 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.393604155, E11.098068838 | 10.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00050 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.074265, E11.604144 | 18.12.2022 |
| Region: Lombardia |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00032 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.049383, E10.35708 | 29.11.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00041 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.040236, E10.36325 | 3.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00046 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.033964, E10.302944 | 16.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00051 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.073379, E10.367887 | 30.12.2022 |
| Region: Emilia Romagna |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00044 | The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.79259, E10. 930896 | 5.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00049 | The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.873686, E11.336651 | 11.12.2022 |
| Region: Friuli Venezia Giulia |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00035 | The area of the parts of Friuli Venezia Giulia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.962481, E12.606420 | 26.11.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Region: Veneto

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00033

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.211179, E11.272346

29.11.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00034

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.221390806, E11.04331334

2.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00036

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.771464, E12.147417

29.11.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00037

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.741660, E12.452298

28.11.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00039

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N 44.964074644, E12.282057809

6.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00040

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.233473, E11.657231

1.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00042

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.296865835, E10.878880005

4.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00043

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.504494974, E12.616275373

3.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00045

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.380764707, E11.07799142

10.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00047

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.966036, E12.305402

13.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00048

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.393604155, E11.098068838

10.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00050

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.074265, E11.604144

18.12.2022

Region: Lombardia

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00032

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.049383, E10.35708

29.11.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00041

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.040236, E10.36325

3.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00046

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.033964, E10.302944

16.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00051

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.073379, E10.367887

30.12.2022

Region: Emilia Romagna

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00044

The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.79259, E10. 930896

5.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00049

The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.873686, E11.336651

11.12.2022

Region: Friuli Venezia Giulia

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00035

The area of the parts of Friuli Venezia Giulia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.962481, E12.606420

26.11.2022

Member State: Hungary

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bács-Kiskun megye |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00211
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00216
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00219
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00225 | Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Fülöpjakab, Jakabszállás és Móricgát települések települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.67844 és 19.65301 és a 46.679183 és a 19.663134, 46.686318 és a 19.661755, valamint a 46.695600 és a 19.681280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 7.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00212
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00217
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00226
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00229
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00230
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00233-00235
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00237 – 00242
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00244
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00247 – 00251
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00256 – 00259
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00262
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00265 | Csólyospálos, Harkakötöny, Jászszentlászló, Kiskunhalas, Kiskunmajsa, Kömpöc, Móricgát Szank és Zsana települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.489980 és a 19.772640, a 46.544237 és a 19.741665, a 46.569793 és a 19.692088, a 46.494360 és a 19.781250, a 46.517887 és a 19.678431, a 46.465166 és a 19.753716, a 46.540082 és a 19.646619, a 46.491690 és a 19.689880, a 46.559267 és a 19.683815, a 46.457070 és a 19.620880, 46.511456 és a 19.726186, a 46.493138 és a 19.690420, a 46.485781 és a 19.676447, a 46.499678 és a 19.687294, a 46.484707 és a 19.693469, a 46.537062 és a 19.727489, a 46.520024 és a 19.725265, a 46.532441 és a 19.644402, a 46.545107 és a 19.702540, a 46.543879 és a 19.700779, a 46.556750 és a 19.783380, a 46.460140 és a 19.480575, a 46.469155 és a 19.769960, a 46.525178 és a 19.618940, a 46.566283 és a 19.627354, valamint a 46.497336 és a 19.775280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 21.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00215
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00218
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00220 – 00221
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00223 – 00224
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00227 – 00228
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00231- 00232
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00252 | Bócsa és Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Kakantyú, Orgovány és Szank települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.627319 és a 19.536083, 46.626416 és a 19.545777, a 46.630891 és a 19.536630, a 46.619573 és a 19.537445, a 46.622916 és a 19.537992, a 46.645837 és a 19.513270, a 46.640484 és a 19.524528, a 46.641252 és a 19.532421, a 46.616930 és a 19.545510, a 46.673759 és a 19.497050, valamint a 46.618622 és a 19.536336 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 15.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00236
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00243
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00245
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00253
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00255
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00260 – 00261
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00263 – 00264 | Csólyospálos és Kömpöc települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.387300 és a 19.862000, a 46.449825 és a 19.874751, a 46.442671 és a 19.844208, a 46.442530 és a 19.847300, a 46.457047 és a 19.878295, a 46.457105 és a 19.878381, a 46.446674 és a 19.842729, a 46.432070 és a 19.844230, a 46.417660 és a 19.855820, valamint a 46.279380 és a 19.344527 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 21.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00238 | Harkakötöny, Kiskunhalas és Kiksunmajsa települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.457070 és a 19.620880 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 13.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00246 | Kispáhi és Orgovány települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.735284 és a 19.458263 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 15.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00254 | Bócsa, Soltvadkert és Tázlár települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.563426 és a 19.472723 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 25.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00257 | Kiskunhalas település közigazgatási területének a 46.460140 és a 19.480575 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 18.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00267 | Kiskunfélegyháza, Pálmonostora és Petőfiszállás települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.633607 és a 19.891596 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 23.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00268 | Jánoshalma és Mélykút települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.279380 és a 19.344527 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 23.12.2022 |
| Csongrád-Csanád megye |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00213 | Algyő, Sándorfalva és Szeged települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.353600 és a 20.173300 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 3.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00214
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00222 | Szentes település közigazgatási területének 46.647079 és a 20.325001, valamint a 46.664455 és a 20.294252 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 3.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00229
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00256
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00265 | Csengele település közigazgatási területének a 46.494360 és a 19.781250, a 46.556750 és a 19.783380, valamint a 46.497336 és a 19.775280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 21.12.2022 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00266 | Bordány, Forráskút és Üllés Szeged települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.359048 és a 19.888786 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 21.12.2022 |
| Békés megye |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00269 | Kaszaper és Tótkomlós települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.437833 és a 20.778503 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 22.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Bács-Kiskun megye

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00211

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00216

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00219

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00225

Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Fülöpjakab, Jakabszállás és Móricgát települések települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.67844 és 19.65301 és a 46.679183 és a 19.663134, 46.686318 és a 19.661755, valamint a 46.695600 és a 19.681280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

7.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00212

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00217

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00226

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00229

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00230

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00233-00235

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00237 – 00242

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00244

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00247 – 00251

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00256 – 00259

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00262

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00265

Csólyospálos, Harkakötöny, Jászszentlászló, Kiskunhalas, Kiskunmajsa, Kömpöc, Móricgát Szank és Zsana települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.489980 és a 19.772640, a 46.544237 és a 19.741665, a 46.569793 és a 19.692088, a 46.494360 és a 19.781250, a 46.517887 és a 19.678431, a 46.465166 és a 19.753716, a 46.540082 és a 19.646619, a 46.491690 és a 19.689880, a 46.559267 és a 19.683815, a 46.457070 és a 19.620880, 46.511456 és a 19.726186, a 46.493138 és a 19.690420, a 46.485781 és a 19.676447, a 46.499678 és a 19.687294, a 46.484707 és a 19.693469, a 46.537062 és a 19.727489, a 46.520024 és a 19.725265, a 46.532441 és a 19.644402, a 46.545107 és a 19.702540, a 46.543879 és a 19.700779, a 46.556750 és a 19.783380, a 46.460140 és a 19.480575, a 46.469155 és a 19.769960, a 46.525178 és a 19.618940, a 46.566283 és a 19.627354, valamint a 46.497336 és a 19.775280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

21.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00215

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00218

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00220 – 00221

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00223 – 00224

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00227 – 00228

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00231- 00232

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00252

Bócsa és Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Kakantyú, Orgovány és Szank települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.627319 és a 19.536083, 46.626416 és a 19.545777, a 46.630891 és a 19.536630, a 46.619573 és a 19.537445, a 46.622916 és a 19.537992, a 46.645837 és a 19.513270, a 46.640484 és a 19.524528, a 46.641252 és a 19.532421, a 46.616930 és a 19.545510, a 46.673759 és a 19.497050, valamint a 46.618622 és a 19.536336 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

15.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00236

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00243

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00245

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00253

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00255

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00260 – 00261

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00263 – 00264

Csólyospálos és Kömpöc települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.387300 és a 19.862000, a 46.449825 és a 19.874751, a 46.442671 és a 19.844208, a 46.442530 és a 19.847300, a 46.457047 és a 19.878295, a 46.457105 és a 19.878381, a 46.446674 és a 19.842729, a 46.432070 és a 19.844230, a 46.417660 és a 19.855820, valamint a 46.279380 és a 19.344527 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

21.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00238

Harkakötöny, Kiskunhalas és Kiksunmajsa települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.457070 és a 19.620880 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

13.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00246

Kispáhi és Orgovány települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.735284 és a 19.458263 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

15.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00254

Bócsa, Soltvadkert és Tázlár települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.563426 és a 19.472723 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

25.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00257

Kiskunhalas település közigazgatási területének a 46.460140 és a 19.480575 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

18.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00267

Kiskunfélegyháza, Pálmonostora és Petőfiszállás települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.633607 és a 19.891596 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

23.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00268

Jánoshalma és Mélykút települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.279380 és a 19.344527 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

23.12.2022

Csongrád-Csanád megye

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00213

Algyő, Sándorfalva és Szeged települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.353600 és a 20.173300 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

3.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00214

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00222

Szentes település közigazgatási területének 46.647079 és a 20.325001, valamint a 46.664455 és a 20.294252 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

3.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00229

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00256

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00265

Csengele település közigazgatási területének a 46.494360 és a 19.781250, a 46.556750 és a 19.783380, valamint a 46.497336 és a 19.775280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

21.12.2022

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00266

Bordány, Forráskút és Üllés Szeged települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.359048 és a 19.888786 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

21.12.2022

Békés megye

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00269

Kaszaper és Tótkomlós települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.437833 és a 20.778503 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

22.12.2022

Member State: the Netherlands

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00085 | Those parts of the municipality Nederweert contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 5.59, lat 51.65 | 2.12.2022 |
| NL-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00736 | Those parts of the municipality Woerden contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4.84, lat 52.13 | 2.12.2022 |
| NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00086 | Those parts of the municipality Venray contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 6.05, lat 51.54 | 13.12.2022 |
| NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00087 | Those parts of the municipality Krimpenerwaard contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4.8, lat 51.97 | 13.12.2022 |
| NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00088 | Those parts of the municipality Súdwest-Fryslân contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 5.47 lat 52.92 | 14.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00085

Those parts of the municipality Nederweert contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 5.59, lat 51.65

2.12.2022

NL-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00736

Those parts of the municipality Woerden contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4.84, lat 52.13

2.12.2022

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00086

Those parts of the municipality Venray contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 6.05, lat 51.54

13.12.2022

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00087

Those parts of the municipality Krimpenerwaard contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4.8, lat 51.97

13.12.2022

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00088

Those parts of the municipality Súdwest-Fryslân contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 5.47 lat 52.92

14.12.2022

Member State: Austria

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | STEIERMARK | |
| AT-HPAI(NON-P)-2022- 00021 | Bezirk Graz-Umgebung: in der Gemeinde Kumberg die Katastralgemeinden Gschwendt, Hofstätten, Kumberg und Rabnitz und in der Gemeinde Eggersdorf bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden Hart bei Eggersdorf, Haselbach und Purgstall | 3.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

STEIERMARK

AT-HPAI(NON-P)-2022- 00021

Bezirk Graz-Umgebung: in der Gemeinde Kumberg die Katastralgemeinden Gschwendt, Hofstätten, Kumberg und Rabnitz und in der Gemeinde Eggersdorf bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden Hart bei Eggersdorf, Haselbach und Purgstall

3.12.2022

United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00001 | Those parts of County Fermanagh contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2073 and E -7,2153 | 7.12.2022 |
| IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00003 | Those parts of County Fermanagh contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54.2093 and E -7,2219 | 13.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 39 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00001

Those parts of County Fermanagh contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2073 and E -7,2153

7.12.2022

IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00003

Those parts of County Fermanagh contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54.2093 and E -7,2219

13.12.2022

Part B

Surveillance zones in the concerned Member States* as referred to in Articles 1 and 3:

Member State: Belgium

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BE-HPAI(P)-2022-00010 | Those parts of the municipalities Arendonk, Beerse, Geel, Herentals, Kasterlee, Lille, Merksplas, Olen, Oud-Turnhout, Ravels, Retie, Turnhout, Vorselaar and Vosselaar, extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and contained within a circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4,930419, lat 51,27616. | 9.12.2022 |
| Those parts of the municipalities Kasterlee, Lille, Turnhout and Vosselaar contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4,930419, lat 51,27616. | 1.12.2022 -9.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01423 | Those parts of the municipality Heuvelland contained within a circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 2,709029, lat 50,670097. | 15.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

BE-HPAI(P)-2022-00010

Those parts of the municipalities Arendonk, Beerse, Geel, Herentals, Kasterlee, Lille, Merksplas, Olen, Oud-Turnhout, Ravels, Retie, Turnhout, Vorselaar and Vosselaar, extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and contained within a circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4,930419, lat 51,27616.

9.12.2022

Those parts of the municipalities Kasterlee, Lille, Turnhout and Vosselaar contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4,930419, lat 51,27616.

1.12.2022 -9.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01423

Those parts of the municipality Heuvelland contained within a circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 2,709029, lat 50,670097.

15.12.2022

Member State: Bulgaria

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Region: Haskovo |
| BG-HPAI(P)-2022-00021 | The folowing village in the Haskovo municipality: Krivo pole, Koren and Momino | 23.11.2022 – 2.12.2022 |
| The following villages in the Haskovo municipality: Elena, Knizhovnik, Malevo, Manastir, Dinevo, Rodopi, Stamboliyski, Stoykovo, Podkrepa
  The following villages in the Harmanli municipality: Slavyanovo, Bolyarski izvor
  The following villages in Stambolovo municipality: Malak izvor, Golyam izvor, Dolno Botevo, Kralevo, Gledka, Stambolovo, Tsareva polyana, Zhalti bryag | 2.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Region: Haskovo

BG-HPAI(P)-2022-00021

The folowing village in the Haskovo municipality: Krivo pole, Koren and Momino

23.11.2022 – 2.12.2022

The following villages in the Haskovo municipality: Elena, Knizhovnik, Malevo, Manastir, Dinevo, Rodopi, Stamboliyski, Stoykovo, Podkrepa

The following villages in the Harmanli municipality: Slavyanovo, Bolyarski izvor

The following villages in Stambolovo municipality: Malak izvor, Golyam izvor, Dolno Botevo, Kralevo, Gledka, Stambolovo, Tsareva polyana, Zhalti bryag

2.12.2022

Member State: Denmark

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| DK-HPAI(P)-2022-00006 | The parts of Slagelse and Næstved municipalities beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of radius 10 kilometres, centred on GPS koordinates coordinates
  N 55,2347; E 11,3952 | 14.12.2022 |
| The parts of Slagelse municipality that are contained within a circle of radius 3 km, centered on GPS coordinates
  N 55,2347; E 11,3952 | 6.12.2022 – 14.12.2022 |
| DK-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00148 | The parts of Sønderborg municipality beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of radius 10 kilometres, centred on GPS koordinates coordinates
  N 54,9365; E 9,9795 | 29.11.2022 |
| The parts of Sønderborg municipality that are contained within a circle of radius 3 km, centered on GPS coordinates
  N 54,9365; E 9,9795 | 21.11.2022 – 29.11.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

DK-HPAI(P)-2022-00006

The parts of Slagelse and Næstved municipalities beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of radius 10 kilometres, centred on GPS koordinates coordinates

N 55,2347; E 11,3952

14.12.2022

The parts of Slagelse municipality that are contained within a circle of radius 3 km, centered on GPS coordinates

N 55,2347; E 11,3952

6.12.2022 – 14.12.2022

DK-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00148

The parts of Sønderborg municipality beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of radius 10 kilometres, centred on GPS koordinates coordinates

N 54,9365; E 9,9795

29.11.2022

The parts of Sønderborg municipality that are contained within a circle of radius 3 km, centered on GPS coordinates

N 54,9365; E 9,9795

21.11.2022 – 29.11.2022

Member State: Germany

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BAYERN |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00088 | Landkreis Dingolfing-Landau

  10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten
  12.469717/48.465004
  Betroffen sind Gemeinden oder Teile der Gemeinden Frontenhausen und Marklkofen. | 12.12.2022 |
| Landkreis Landshut

  10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten
  12.469717/48.465004
  Betroffen sind Gemeinden oder Teile der Gemeinden Adlkofen,
  Aham, Bodenkirchen, Geisenhausen, Gerzen, Kröning, Schalkam, Vilsbiburg | 12.12.2022 |
| DE-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-01198 | Landkreis Miltenberg

  10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten
  9.178982/49.740677
  Betroffen sind die Städte und Gemeinden Erlenbach a.Main, Obernburg a.Main, Wörth a.Main, Elsenfeld mit den Gemarkungen Schippach und Rück, Eschau, Mönchberg, Röllbach, Collenberg mit der Gemarkung Reistenhausen, Bürgstadt, Miltenberg mit den Gemarkungen Wenschdorf, Mainbullau und Breitendiel, Weilbach mit den Gemarkungen Weckbach und Ohrenbach, Amorbach mit den Gemarkungen Reichartshausen und Boxbrunn im Odenwald | 7.12.2022 |
| Landkreis Miltenberg

  3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten
  9.178982/49.740677
  Betroffen ist die Stadt Klingenberg a. Main mit den Gemarkungen Trennfurt und Röllfeld sowie die Gemeinden Großheubach, Kleinheubach, Rüdenau und Laudenbach | 28.11.2022 - 7.12.2022 |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00088 | Landkreis Mühldorf

  10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten 12.469717/48.465004
  Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Egglkofen und der Stadt Neumarkt St. Veit | 12.12.2022 |
| Landkreis Rottal-Inn

  10 km um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten
  12,469717/48,465004
  Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Gangkofen. | 12.12.2022 |
| HESSEN |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00086 | Landkreis Gießen

  10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Hungen, Lich und Laubach. | 9.12.2022 |
| Landkreis Gießen

  3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Hungen | 1.12.2022-9.12.2022 |
| DE-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-01198 | Landkreis Odenwald

  In der Gemeinde Michelstadt die Gemarkungen Vielbrunn und Weitengesäß, in der Gemarkung Würzberg das Gebiet nördlich Mangelsbach und östlich der K 45,
  in der Gemeinde Bad König die Gemarkung Bad König östlich der Verbindungsstraße zwischen Kimbacher Straße und Mainstraße und östlich des Birkertsgrabens und nördlich der L 3318, die Gemarkungen Kimbach, Momart östlich der Straße Strathweg und nördlich der Hohe Straße, in der Gemarkung Fürstengrund das Gebiet östlich des Waldrandes,
  in der Gemeinde Lützelbach die Gemarkungen Lützel-Wiebelsbach, Breitenbrunn, Haingrund und Seckmauern, in der Gemeinde Breuberg die Gemarkung Rai-Breitenbach östlich der L 3259 und der Mühlhäuser Straße bis abzweig Kreuzstarße und südlich der Kreuzstraße und deren Verlängerung nach Osten bis zur Landesgrenze. | 7.12.2022 |
| Landkreis Odenwald

  In der Gemeinde Michelstadt die Gemarkung Vielbrunn östlich der Langestein-Schneise und der K 94 ab dem Abzweig zur Alten Laudenbacher Straße | 29.11.2022-7.12.2022 |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00086 | Wetteraukreis

  10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Nidda, Ranstadt, Florstadt, Reichelsheim, Echzell, Wölfersheim, Bad Nauheim, Münzenberg und Rockenberg. | 9.12.2022 |
| Wetteraukreis

  3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Wölfersheim, Echzell und Nidda | 1.12.2022-9.12.2022 |
| MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00082 | Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg

  10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten 10.634830/53.898535
  Betroffen ist die Gemeinde Lüdersdorf, Ortsteil Herrnburg | 2.12.2022 |
| NIEDERSACHSEN |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00089 | Landkreis Aurich

  10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten:
  7.649228/53.428679
  Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Großefehn, Wiesmoor, Aurich, Ihlow, Wittmund, Friedeburg, Hesel, Firrel und Uplengen. | 17.12.2022 |
| Landkreis Aurich

  3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten:
  7.649228/53.428679
  Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Großefehn und Wiesmoor. | 9.12.2022 - 17.12.2022 |
| DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00066
  DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00071
  DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00073
  DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00074
  DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00075
  DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00078 | Landkreis Cloppenburg

  Union der 10 km- Radien um die Ausbruchsbetriebe mit den GPS Koordinaten:






  — | 7.637125/52.928354 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

BAYERN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00088

Landkreis Dingolfing-Landau

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten

12.469717/48.465004

Betroffen sind Gemeinden oder Teile der Gemeinden Frontenhausen und Marklkofen.

12.12.2022

Landkreis Landshut

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten

12.469717/48.465004

Betroffen sind Gemeinden oder Teile der Gemeinden Adlkofen,

Aham, Bodenkirchen, Geisenhausen, Gerzen, Kröning, Schalkam, Vilsbiburg

12.12.2022

DE-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-01198

Landkreis Miltenberg

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten

9.178982/49.740677

Betroffen sind die Städte und Gemeinden Erlenbach a.Main, Obernburg a.Main, Wörth a.Main, Elsenfeld mit den Gemarkungen Schippach und Rück, Eschau, Mönchberg, Röllbach, Collenberg mit der Gemarkung Reistenhausen, Bürgstadt, Miltenberg mit den Gemarkungen Wenschdorf, Mainbullau und Breitendiel, Weilbach mit den Gemarkungen Weckbach und Ohrenbach, Amorbach mit den Gemarkungen Reichartshausen und Boxbrunn im Odenwald

7.12.2022

Landkreis Miltenberg

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten

9.178982/49.740677

Betroffen ist die Stadt Klingenberg a. Main mit den Gemarkungen Trennfurt und Röllfeld sowie die Gemeinden Großheubach, Kleinheubach, Rüdenau und Laudenbach

28.11.2022 - 7.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00088

Landkreis Mühldorf

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten 12.469717/48.465004

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Egglkofen und der Stadt Neumarkt St. Veit

12.12.2022

Landkreis Rottal-Inn

10 km um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten

12,469717/48,465004

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Gangkofen.

12.12.2022

HESSEN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00086

Landkreis Gießen

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Hungen, Lich und Laubach.

9.12.2022

Landkreis Gießen

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Hungen

1.12.2022-9.12.2022

DE-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-01198

Landkreis Odenwald

In der Gemeinde Michelstadt die Gemarkungen Vielbrunn und Weitengesäß, in der Gemarkung Würzberg das Gebiet nördlich Mangelsbach und östlich der K 45,

in der Gemeinde Bad König die Gemarkung Bad König östlich der Verbindungsstraße zwischen Kimbacher Straße und Mainstraße und östlich des Birkertsgrabens und nördlich der L 3318, die Gemarkungen Kimbach, Momart östlich der Straße Strathweg und nördlich der Hohe Straße, in der Gemarkung Fürstengrund das Gebiet östlich des Waldrandes,

in der Gemeinde Lützelbach die Gemarkungen Lützel-Wiebelsbach, Breitenbrunn, Haingrund und Seckmauern, in der Gemeinde Breuberg die Gemarkung Rai-Breitenbach östlich der L 3259 und der Mühlhäuser Straße bis abzweig Kreuzstarße und südlich der Kreuzstraße und deren Verlängerung nach Osten bis zur Landesgrenze.

7.12.2022

Landkreis Odenwald

In der Gemeinde Michelstadt die Gemarkung Vielbrunn östlich der Langestein-Schneise und der K 94 ab dem Abzweig zur Alten Laudenbacher Straße

29.11.2022-7.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00086

Wetteraukreis

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Nidda, Ranstadt, Florstadt, Reichelsheim, Echzell, Wölfersheim, Bad Nauheim, Münzenberg und Rockenberg.

9.12.2022

Wetteraukreis

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten: 8.887042/50.438181 Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Wölfersheim, Echzell und Nidda

1.12.2022-9.12.2022

MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00082

Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten 10.634830/53.898535

Betroffen ist die Gemeinde Lüdersdorf, Ortsteil Herrnburg

2.12.2022

NIEDERSACHSEN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00089

Landkreis Aurich

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten:

7.649228/53.428679

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Großefehn, Wiesmoor, Aurich, Ihlow, Wittmund, Friedeburg, Hesel, Firrel und Uplengen.

17.12.2022

Landkreis Aurich

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten:

7.649228/53.428679

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Großefehn und Wiesmoor.

9.12.2022 - 17.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00066

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00071

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00073

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00074

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00075

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00078

Landkreis Cloppenburg

Union der 10 km- Radien um die Ausbruchsbetriebe mit den GPS Koordinaten:

—

7.637125/52.928354

| — | 7.636603/52.946859 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.636603/52.946859

| — | 7.626829/52.927051 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.626829/52.927051

| — | 7.627312/52.927022 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.627312/52.927022

| — | 7.623793/52.928842 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.623793/52.928842

| — | 7.621157/52.951913 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.621157/52.951913

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinde Saterland und der Stadt Friesoythe.

29.11.2022

Landkreis Emsland

Union der 10 km- Radien um die Ausbruchsbetriebe mit den GPS Koordinaten:

| — | 7.637125/52.928354 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.637125/52.928354

| — | 7.636603/52.946859 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.636603/52.946859

| — | 7.626829/52.927051 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.626829/52.927051

| — | 7.627312/52.927022 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.627312/52.927022

| — | 7.623793/52.928842 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.623793/52.928842

| — | 7.621157/52.951913 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.621157/52.951913

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Börger, Bockhorst, Breddenberg, Esterwegen, Hilkenbrook, Lorup, Rastdorf, Sögel, Spahnharrenstätte, Surwold, Vrees, Werlte und Werpeloh.

29.11.2022

Landkreis Emsland

Union der 3 km- Radien um die Ausbruchsbetriebe mit den GPS Koordinaten:

| — | 7.637125/52.928354 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.637125/52.928354

| — | 7.636603/52.946859 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.636603/52.946859

| — | 7.626829/52.927051 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.626829/52.927051

| — | 7.627312/52.927022 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.627312/52.927022

| — | 7.623793/52.928842 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.623793/52.928842

| — | 7.621157/52.951913 |
| --- | --- |

—

7.621157/52.951913

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Börger, Breddenberg, Esterwegen und Lorup.

21.11.2022-29.11.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00079

Landkreis Osnabrück

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten:

8.103891/52.330964

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Belm und Wallenhorst und der Stadt Osnabrück.

1.12.2022

Landkreis Osnabrück

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten:

8.103891/52.330964

Betroffen sind Teile der Gemeinden Belm, Bissendorf, Bohmte, Bramsche, Ostercappeln, Wallenhorst und der Stadt Osnabrück.

23.11.2022- 1.12.2022

NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00085

Kreis Kleve

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 6.441599/51.772975)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Kreises Kleve mit der Stadt Rees |
| --- | --- |

—

des Kreises Kleve mit der Stadt Rees

27.11.2022 – 5.12.2022

Kreis Kleve

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 6.441599/51.772975)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Kreises Kleve mit den Städten Rees, Kalkar, Emmerich |
| --- | --- |

—

des Kreises Kleve mit den Städten Rees, Kalkar, Emmerich

| — | des Kreises Borken mit den Städten Isselburg, Bocholt, |
| --- | --- |

—

des Kreises Borken mit den Städten Isselburg, Bocholt,

| — | des Kreises Wesel mit den Städten Hamminkeln, Wesel, Xanten |
| --- | --- |

—

des Kreises Wesel mit den Städten Hamminkeln, Wesel, Xanten

5.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00080

Oberbergischer Kreis

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.710063/50.961332

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Gemeide Reichshof |
| --- | --- |

—

des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Gemeide Reichshof

24.11.2022 - 2.12.2022

Oberbergischer Kreis

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.710063/50.961332

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Oberbergischen Kreises mit den Städten Wiehl, Waldbröl, Bergneustadt, Gummersbach und mit den Gemeiden Reichshof, Nümbrecht, Morsbach |
| --- | --- |

—

des Oberbergischen Kreises mit den Städten Wiehl, Waldbröl, Bergneustadt, Gummersbach und mit den Gemeiden Reichshof, Nümbrecht, Morsbach

| — | des Kreises Olpe mit den Städten Drolshagen und Olpe und der Gemeinde Wenden |
| --- | --- |

—

des Kreises Olpe mit den Städten Drolshagen und Olpe und der Gemeinde Wenden

2.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00084

Oberbergischer Kreis

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.685763/50.834267)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Gemeinde Morsbach |
| --- | --- |

—

des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Gemeinde Morsbach

30.11.2022 – 8.12.2022

Oberbergischer Kreis

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.685763/50.834267)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Oberbergischen Kreises mit den Gemeinden Morsbach, Nümbrecht, Reichshof, der Stadt Waldbröl |
| --- | --- |

—

des Oberbergischen Kreises mit den Gemeinden Morsbach, Nümbrecht, Reichshof, der Stadt Waldbröl

| — | des Rhein-Sieg-Kreises mit der Gemeinde Windeck |
| --- | --- |

—

des Rhein-Sieg-Kreises mit der Gemeinde Windeck

| — | des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz |
| --- | --- |

—

des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz

8.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00079

(Ausbruch in Niedersachsen)

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 8.103891/52.330964)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Kreises Steinfurt mit der Gemeinde Lotte |
| --- | --- |

—

des Kreises Steinfurt mit der Gemeinde Lotte

1.12.2022

DE-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-01219

Rhein-Sieg-Kreis

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.640940/50.800340)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Rhein-Sieg-Kreises mit der Gemeinde Windeck, |
| --- | --- |

—

des Rhein-Sieg-Kreises mit der Gemeinde Windeck,

| — | des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Stadt Waldbröhl und der Gemeinde Morsbach |
| --- | --- |

—

des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Stadt Waldbröhl und der Gemeinde Morsbach

28.11.2022 – 6.12.2022

Rhein-Sieg-Kreis

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.640940/50.800340)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Rhein-Sieg-Kreises mit der Gemeinde Windeck, Ruppichteroth, Eitorf |
| --- | --- |

—

des Rhein-Sieg-Kreises mit der Gemeinde Windeck, Ruppichteroth, Eitorf

| — | des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Stadt Waldbröhl und der Gemeinde Morsbach, Nümbrecht |
| --- | --- |

—

des Oberbergischen Kreises mit der Stadt Waldbröhl und der Gemeinde Morsbach, Nümbrecht

6.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00087

Rheinisch Bergischer Kreis

3 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.111490/50.982802)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Rheinisch Bergischen Kreises mit der Stadt Bergisch Gladbach |
| --- | --- |

—

des Rheinisch Bergischen Kreises mit der Stadt Bergisch Gladbach

| — | der Stadt Köln |
| --- | --- |

—

der Stadt Köln

26.11.2022 – 4.12.2022

Rheinisch Bergischer Kreis

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 7.111490/50.982802)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| — | des Rheinisch Bergischen Kreises mit den Städten Bergisch Gladbach, Burscheid, Wermelskirchen, den Gemeinden Odenthal, Kürten, Overath, Rösrath |
| --- | --- |

—

des Rheinisch Bergischen Kreises mit den Städten Bergisch Gladbach, Burscheid, Wermelskirchen, den Gemeinden Odenthal, Kürten, Overath, Rösrath

| — | der Stadt Köln |
| --- | --- |

—

der Stadt Köln

| — | der Stadt Leverkusen |
| --- | --- |

—

der Stadt Leverkusen

4.12.2022

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00086

(Ausbruch in den Niederlanden)

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb (GPS-Koordinaten 6.043777/51.532737)

Betroffen sind Teile:

| | des Kreises Kleve mit den Städten Kevelaer, Goch und der Gemeinde Weeze |
| --- | --- |

des Kreises Kleve mit den Städten Kevelaer, Goch und der Gemeinde Weeze

22.12.2022

RHEINLAND-PFALZ

DE-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-01219

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00080

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00081

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00084

Kreis Altenkirchen

Union der 10 km Radien um die Ausbruchsbetriebe mit den GPS-Koordinaten:

| | 7.685763/50.834267 |
| --- | --- |

7.685763/50.834267

| | 7.640940/50.800340 |
| --- | --- |

7.640940/50.800340

| | 7.710063/50.961332 |
| --- | --- |

7.710063/50.961332

| | 7.980232/50.871116 |
| --- | --- |

7.980232/50.871116

Betroffen sind Verbandsgemeinden Hamm, Kirchen und Wissen sowie die Stadt Herdorf, außerdem in der Verbandsgemeinde Altenkirchen-Flammersfeld die Ortsgemeinden Werkhausen, Oberirsen, Ölsen, Wölmersen, Busenhausen, Kettenhausen, Obererbach, Heupelzen, Bachenberg, Hilgenroth, Volkerzen, Racksen, Isert, Eichelhardt, Idelberg und Helmeroth

15.12.2022

DE-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-01219

Westerwaldkreis

10 km Radius um den Ausbruchsbetrieb mit den GPS-Koordinaten: 7.640940/50.800340

Betroffen sind in der Gemeinde Stein-Wingert die Ortsteile Altburg und Alhausen und in der Gemeinde Mörsbach der nordwestliche Teil des Staatsforstes Hachenburg

16.12.2022

SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00082

Hansestadt Lübeck

Ausgehend im Norden von An der Bundesstr. Haus-Nr.12 die Stadtgrenze nach Osten entlang bis zur Schwartauer Landstr., Schwartauer Allee bis zu und weiter auf Bei der Lohmühle, Schönböckener Str., Steinrader Damm bis Hofland, Hofland bis zur Kieler Str., Kieler Str. nach Nordwesten bis zum Kreisverkehr, Steinrader Hauptstr. bis zur Stadtgrenze, die Stadtgrenze entlang nach Norden bis zu An der Bundesstr. Haus-Nr.12

4.12.2022

Hansesatdt Lübeck

Das gesamte Stadtgebiet mit Ausnahme der Stadtbezirke:

| | Alt-Kücknitz/Dummersdorf/Roter Hahn; Pöppendorf; Ivendorf; Teutendorf; Alt-Travemünde/Rönnau; Brodten; Priwall; |
| --- | --- |

Alt-Kücknitz/Dummersdorf/Roter Hahn; Pöppendorf; Ivendorf; Teutendorf; Alt-Travemünde/Rönnau; Brodten; Priwall;

| | Krummesse; Beidendorf; Blankensee und der südöstlich des Müggenbuschwegs gelegene Teil des Stadtbezirks Strecknitz. |
| --- | --- |

Krummesse; Beidendorf; Blankensee und der südöstlich des Müggenbuschwegs gelegene Teil des Stadtbezirks Strecknitz.

25.11.2022 – 4.12.2022

Kreis Herzogtum Lauenburg

Betroffen sind die nördlichen 150 Meter der Gemeinde Groß Schenkenberg, Gemarkung Rothenhausen, Flur 1, Flurstück 1, Flurstück 73/2 und Flurstück 76/21 angrenzend an die Hansestadt Lübeck. In der Überwachungszone des Kreises Herzogtum Lauenburg befinden sind keine Geflügelhaltungen.

4.12.2022

Kreis Ostholstein

Gemeinden/Stadt: Stockelsdorf, Bad Schwartau, Teil Ratekau, Teil Scharbeutz, Teil Ahrensbök

4.12.2022

Kreis Ostholstein

Gemeinden/Stadt: Stockelsdorf, Bad Schwartau, Teil Ratekau, Teil Scharbeutz, Teil Ahrensbök

25.11.2022 – 4.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00083

Kreis Rendsburg-Eckernförde

Die Überwachungszone umfasst

| — | die Teile der Gemeinden Emkendorf, Bokel und Groß Vollstedt die nicht in der Schutzzone liegen |
| --- | --- |

—

die Teile der Gemeinden Emkendorf, Bokel und Groß Vollstedt die nicht in der Schutzzone liegen

| — | die Gemeinde Bredenbek südlich des Straßenzugs Kieler Straße/Rendsburger Straße (K67) |
| --- | --- |

—

die Gemeinde Bredenbek südlich des Straßenzugs Kieler Straße/Rendsburger Straße (K67)

| — | die Gemeinde Bovenau südlich der Kieler Straße ausgenommen des Bereichs nördlich der gedachten Verbindungslinie zwischen der Koordinate 54.32441; 9.84070 (Einmündung Feldweg) und der Koordinate 54.32054; 9.85893 (Kreuzung Rendsburger Straße/Kronsfelde) |
| --- | --- |

—

die Gemeinde Bovenau südlich der Kieler Straße ausgenommen des Bereichs nördlich der gedachten Verbindungslinie zwischen der Koordinate 54.32441; 9.84070 (Einmündung Feldweg) und der Koordinate 54.32054; 9.85893 (Kreuzung Rendsburger Straße/Kronsfelde)

| — | den südlich der Bundesautobahn A210 gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Felde |
| --- | --- |

—

den südlich der Bundesautobahn A210 gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Felde

| — | den südlich der Landesstraße L255 gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Schierensee |
| --- | --- |

—

den südlich der Landesstraße L255 gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Schierensee

| — | den westlich der Bundesautobahn A215 gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Sören |
| --- | --- |

—

den westlich der Bundesautobahn A215 gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Sören

| — | den nördlich des Straßenzuges Dorfstraße/Heinkenborsteler Weg gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Gnutz |
| --- | --- |

—

den nördlich des Straßenzuges Dorfstraße/Heinkenborsteler Weg gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Gnutz

| — | den östlich des Straßenzugs Rüsterbergen-Hasenkrug-Dorfstraße gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Schülp bei Rendsburg |
| --- | --- |

—

den östlich des Straßenzugs Rüsterbergen-Hasenkrug-Dorfstraße gelegenen Teil der Gemeinde Schülp bei Rendsburg

| — | die Gesamtfläche der Gemeinden Achterwehr, Bargstedt, Borgdorf-Seedorf, Brammer, Dätgen, Ellerdorf, Eisendorf, Groß Vollstedt, Haßmoor, Jevenstedt, Langwedel, Luhnstedt, Nortorf, Oldenhütten, Ostenfeld, Osterrönfeld, Rade bei Rendsburg, Schacht-Audorf, Schülldorf, Schülp bei Nortorf, Stafstedt, Warder, Westerrönfeld, Westensee, und der Stadt Rendsburg |
| --- | --- |

—

die Gesamtfläche der Gemeinden Achterwehr, Bargstedt, Borgdorf-Seedorf, Brammer, Dätgen, Ellerdorf, Eisendorf, Groß Vollstedt, Haßmoor, Jevenstedt, Langwedel, Luhnstedt, Nortorf, Oldenhütten, Ostenfeld, Osterrönfeld, Rade bei Rendsburg, Schacht-Audorf, Schülldorf, Schülp bei Nortorf, Stafstedt, Warder, Westerrönfeld, Westensee, und der Stadt Rendsburg

10.12.2022

Kreis Rendsburg-Eckernförde

3 km Radius um Primär-Ausbruchsbetrieb GPS Koordinaten 9,799269/54,237815

Teile der Gemeinden Emkendorf, Bokel und Groß Vollstedt

2.12.2022 -10.12.2022

DE-HPAI(P)-2022-00082

Kreis Segeberg

Gemeinden Pronstorf und Strukdorf

4.12.2022

Kreis Stormarn

Betroffen von der Überwachungszone ist jeweils das gesamte Gemeindegebiet der Gemeinden Heilshoop, Mönkhagen, Zarpen, Badendorf, Hamberge, Wesenberg, Heidekamp sowie Teile des Gemeindegebietes der Gemeinden Rehhorst, Reinfeld und Klein Wesenberg

4.12.2022

Member State: Ireland

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Monaghan County |
| IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00001
  IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00003 | That part of the County of Monaghan that comprises the Electoral Divisions of Killeevan and Newbliss, the Electoral Division of Clones, except for the townlands of Derryarrit and Skeatry, the Electoral Divisions of Clones Rural, Clones Urban and St. Tierney, apart from the townlands situate in the protection zone, the townlands of Aghareagh, Closdaw, Corkish, Corlougharoe, Correvan, Drumanan, Drumacreeve, Drumary, Drumcrow, Drumgramph, Drumlina, Killyeg, Lislongfield, Tullyard, all in the Electoral Division of Drum, the Electoral Division of Drumhillagh, except for the townlands of Aghaclay, Carn, Corleck, Doosky, Drumhullagh, Drumkirk, Drumleny, Liscumaskey and Latnamard, the townlands of Annaghbrack, Brookvale, Carrowbarra, Carrowbarra Island, Coolatty, Gortmore South, Liscat, Naghill, Mullabrack, Mulladuff, Mullanacross, Skeagh, Skervan, Thornhill, all in the Electoral Division of Drumsnat, the Electoral Division of Drummully except for the townlands of Annaghraw and Clontask, the townlands of Derrins and Lurganboy, all in the Electoral Division of Killynenagh, the townlands of Aghagaw, Allagesh, Annagh, Annyeeb, Aughnahunshin, Corrinshigo, Crenlough, Drumslavog, Formoyle, Gortmore North, Graffagh, Killytur, Killydonnelly and Mullatagorry, all in the Electoral Division of Scotstown, the townlands of Cornacreeve, Cornaguillagh, Derrynahesco, Kilmore West, Lennaght and Sruveel, all in the Electoral Division of Sheskin, the townlands of Carolina, Crover, Drumaghkeel, Drumskelt, Drumgristin, Feagh, and Mullymagaraghan, all in the Electoral Division of Aghabog, and the townlands Aghnahola, Annaveagh, Annies, Carnroe, Cavanreagh, Cavany, Coolnacarte, Corraskea, Drumgarran, Drumreenagh, Dunsrim, Hilton Demense, Killyfargy, Lisarearke, Skerrick East, Lisnalee, all of the Electoral Division of Currin.
  That part of the County of Monaghan that comprises the Electoral Divisions of Killeevan and Newbliss, the Electoral Division of Clones, except for the townlands of Derryarrit and Skeatry, the Electoral Divisions of Clones Rural, Clones Urban and St. Tierney, apart from the townlands situate in the protection zone, the townlands of Aghareagh, Closdaw, Cornawall, Corkish, Corlougharoe, Correvan, Drumanan, Drumacreeve, Drumary, Drumcrow, Drumgramph, Drumlina, Killyeg, Lislea, Lislongfield, Tullyard, all in the Electoral Division of Drum, the Electoral Division of Drumhillagh, except for the townlands of Aghaclay, Corleck, Drumhullagh, Drumkirk, Drumleny, Liscumaskey and Latnamard, the townlands of Annaghbrack, Brookvale, Carnasoo, Carrowbarra, Carrowbarra Island, Coolatty, Gortmore South, Liscat, Naghill, Mullabrack, Mulladuff, Mullanacross, Mullavannog, Skeagh, Skervan, Thornhill, all in the Electoral Division of Drumsnat, the Electoral Division of Drummully except for the townlands of Annaghraw and Clontask, the townlands of Briscarnagh, Derrins and Lurganboy, all in the Electoral Division of Killynenagh, the townlands of Aghagaw, Allagesh, Annagh, Annyeeb, Aughnahunshin, Corrinshigo, Crenlough, Drumslavog, Formoyle, Gortmore North, Graffagh, Killytur, Killydonnelly, Tirnaskea South and Mullatagorry, all in the Electoral Division of Scotstown, the townlands of Cornacreeve, Cornaguillagh, Derrynahesco, Derryallaghan, Derrynasell West, Kilmore West, Lennaght, Milligan and Sruveel, all in the Electoral Division of Sheskin, the townlands of Carolina, Crover, Drumaghakeel, Drumskelt, Drumgristin, Feagh, and Mullymagaraghan, all in the Electoral Division of Aghabog, and the townlands Aghnahola, Annaveagh, Annies, Carnroe, Cavanreagh, Cavany, Coolnacarte, Corraskea, Drumgarran, Drumreenagh, Dunsrim, Hilton Demense, Killyfargy, Lisarearke, Lisnalee and Skerrick East, all of the Electoral Division of Currin. | 22.12.2022 |
| That part of the County of Monaghan) that comprises the townlands of Largy, lying partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural and partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Urban, Aghafin, Atartate Glebe, Burdautien, Carney’s Island, Carrivatragh, Cavan, Clonkirk, Clonkee (Cole), Corraghy, Creevaghy, Drumard, Edenaforan, Gortnawhinny, Legnakelly, Leonard’s Island, Liseggerton, Lisnaroe Near, Lisoarty, Longfield, Magheramore, Mullanacloy, Shanamullen South, Tanderagee, Tirnahinch Near, Tirnahinch Far, all in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural, and Carrickmore and Drumadagory, all in the Electoral Division of St. Tierney
  That part of the County of Monaghan) that comprises the townlands of Largy, lying partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural and partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Urban, Aghafin, Altartate Glebe, Burdautien, Carney’s Island, Carrivatragh, Cavan, Clonkirk, Clonkeen (Cole), Corraghy, Creevaghy, Drumard, Edenaforan, Gortnawhinny, Legnakelly, Leonard’s Island, Liseggerton, Lisnaroe Near, Lisoarty, Longfield, Magheranure, Mullanacloy, Shanamullen South, Tanderagee, Tirnahinch Near, Tirnahinch Far, all in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural, and Carrickmore, Drumadagory and Drumaddarainy, all in the Electoral Division of St. Tierney | 14.12.2022- 22.12.202 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Monaghan County

IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00001

IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00003

That part of the County of Monaghan that comprises the Electoral Divisions of Killeevan and Newbliss, the Electoral Division of Clones, except for the townlands of Derryarrit and Skeatry, the Electoral Divisions of Clones Rural, Clones Urban and St. Tierney, apart from the townlands situate in the protection zone, the townlands of Aghareagh, Closdaw, Corkish, Corlougharoe, Correvan, Drumanan, Drumacreeve, Drumary, Drumcrow, Drumgramph, Drumlina, Killyeg, Lislongfield, Tullyard, all in the Electoral Division of Drum, the Electoral Division of Drumhillagh, except for the townlands of Aghaclay, Carn, Corleck, Doosky, Drumhullagh, Drumkirk, Drumleny, Liscumaskey and Latnamard, the townlands of Annaghbrack, Brookvale, Carrowbarra, Carrowbarra Island, Coolatty, Gortmore South, Liscat, Naghill, Mullabrack, Mulladuff, Mullanacross, Skeagh, Skervan, Thornhill, all in the Electoral Division of Drumsnat, the Electoral Division of Drummully except for the townlands of Annaghraw and Clontask, the townlands of Derrins and Lurganboy, all in the Electoral Division of Killynenagh, the townlands of Aghagaw, Allagesh, Annagh, Annyeeb, Aughnahunshin, Corrinshigo, Crenlough, Drumslavog, Formoyle, Gortmore North, Graffagh, Killytur, Killydonnelly and Mullatagorry, all in the Electoral Division of Scotstown, the townlands of Cornacreeve, Cornaguillagh, Derrynahesco, Kilmore West, Lennaght and Sruveel, all in the Electoral Division of Sheskin, the townlands of Carolina, Crover, Drumaghkeel, Drumskelt, Drumgristin, Feagh, and Mullymagaraghan, all in the Electoral Division of Aghabog, and the townlands Aghnahola, Annaveagh, Annies, Carnroe, Cavanreagh, Cavany, Coolnacarte, Corraskea, Drumgarran, Drumreenagh, Dunsrim, Hilton Demense, Killyfargy, Lisarearke, Skerrick East, Lisnalee, all of the Electoral Division of Currin.

That part of the County of Monaghan that comprises the Electoral Divisions of Killeevan and Newbliss, the Electoral Division of Clones, except for the townlands of Derryarrit and Skeatry, the Electoral Divisions of Clones Rural, Clones Urban and St. Tierney, apart from the townlands situate in the protection zone, the townlands of Aghareagh, Closdaw, Cornawall, Corkish, Corlougharoe, Correvan, Drumanan, Drumacreeve, Drumary, Drumcrow, Drumgramph, Drumlina, Killyeg, Lislea, Lislongfield, Tullyard, all in the Electoral Division of Drum, the Electoral Division of Drumhillagh, except for the townlands of Aghaclay, Corleck, Drumhullagh, Drumkirk, Drumleny, Liscumaskey and Latnamard, the townlands of Annaghbrack, Brookvale, Carnasoo, Carrowbarra, Carrowbarra Island, Coolatty, Gortmore South, Liscat, Naghill, Mullabrack, Mulladuff, Mullanacross, Mullavannog, Skeagh, Skervan, Thornhill, all in the Electoral Division of Drumsnat, the Electoral Division of Drummully except for the townlands of Annaghraw and Clontask, the townlands of Briscarnagh, Derrins and Lurganboy, all in the Electoral Division of Killynenagh, the townlands of Aghagaw, Allagesh, Annagh, Annyeeb, Aughnahunshin, Corrinshigo, Crenlough, Drumslavog, Formoyle, Gortmore North, Graffagh, Killytur, Killydonnelly, Tirnaskea South and Mullatagorry, all in the Electoral Division of Scotstown, the townlands of Cornacreeve, Cornaguillagh, Derrynahesco, Derryallaghan, Derrynasell West, Kilmore West, Lennaght, Milligan and Sruveel, all in the Electoral Division of Sheskin, the townlands of Carolina, Crover, Drumaghakeel, Drumskelt, Drumgristin, Feagh, and Mullymagaraghan, all in the Electoral Division of Aghabog, and the townlands Aghnahola, Annaveagh, Annies, Carnroe, Cavanreagh, Cavany, Coolnacarte, Corraskea, Drumgarran, Drumreenagh, Dunsrim, Hilton Demense, Killyfargy, Lisarearke, Lisnalee and Skerrick East, all of the Electoral Division of Currin.

22.12.2022

That part of the County of Monaghan) that comprises the townlands of Largy, lying partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural and partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Urban, Aghafin, Atartate Glebe, Burdautien, Carney’s Island, Carrivatragh, Cavan, Clonkirk, Clonkee (Cole), Corraghy, Creevaghy, Drumard, Edenaforan, Gortnawhinny, Legnakelly, Leonard’s Island, Liseggerton, Lisnaroe Near, Lisoarty, Longfield, Magheramore, Mullanacloy, Shanamullen South, Tanderagee, Tirnahinch Near, Tirnahinch Far, all in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural, and Carrickmore and Drumadagory, all in the Electoral Division of St. Tierney

That part of the County of Monaghan) that comprises the townlands of Largy, lying partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural and partly in the Electoral Division of Clones Urban, Aghafin, Altartate Glebe, Burdautien, Carney’s Island, Carrivatragh, Cavan, Clonkirk, Clonkeen (Cole), Corraghy, Creevaghy, Drumard, Edenaforan, Gortnawhinny, Legnakelly, Leonard’s Island, Liseggerton, Lisnaroe Near, Lisoarty, Longfield, Magheranure, Mullanacloy, Shanamullen South, Tanderagee, Tirnahinch Near, Tirnahinch Far, all in the Electoral Division of Clones Rural, and Carrickmore, Drumadagory and Drumaddarainy, all in the Electoral Division of St. Tierney

14.12.2022- 22.12.202

Member State: France

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Département: Côtes-d’Armor (22) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01406 | GOMENÉ
  LANRELAS
  LAURENAN
  MERDRIGNAC
  LE MENÉ
  PLÉNÉE-JUGON
  ROUILLAC
  SEVIGNAC
  TRÉMOREL | 2.12.2022 |
| ÉRÉAC
  MÉRILLAC
  MERDRIGNAC
  LE MENÉ
  SAINT-VRAN
  SAINT-LAUNEUC | 24.11.2022 – 2.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01413 | PLERIN
  SAINT-BRIEUC
  PLOUFRAGAN
  TREGUEUX
  PLEDRAN
  YFFINIAC
  QUESSOY
  POMMERET
  LAMBALLE
  COETMIEUX
  ANDEL
  MORIEUX
  PLANGUENOUAL | 7.12.2022 |
| HILLION
  LANGUEUX | 29.11.2022 – 7.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01419
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01425 | BOBITAL
  BRUSVILY
  CAULNES
  DINAN
  EVRAN
  GUENROC
  GUITTE
  LANVALLAY
  LE HINGLE
  LES CHAMPS-GERAUX
  PLOUASNE
  PLUMAUDAN
  SAINT-CARNE
  SAINT-JUDOCE
  TRELIVAN
  YVIGNAC-LA-TOUR | 17.12.2022 |
| CALORGUEN
  EVRAN
  LE QUIOU
  SAINT-ANDRE-DES-EAUX
  SAINT-JUVAT
  SAINT-MADEN
  TREFUMEL
  TREVRON | 9.12.2022- 17.12.2022 |
| Département: Eure (27) |
| FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00354 | MESNIL-EN-OUCHE (partie ouest/D49)
  LES BOTTEREAUX
  CHAMBLAC
  CHAMBORD
  LA GOULAFRIERE
  JUIGNETTES
  MONTREUIL-L’ARGILLE
  SAINT-AGNAN-DE-CERNIERES
  SAINT-DENIS-D’AUGERONS
  SAINT-LAURENT-DU-TENCEMENT
  LA TRINITE-DE-REVILLE
  VERNEUSSES | 16.12.2022 |
| LA HAYE-SAINT-SYLVESTRE
  MELICOURT
  MESNIL-ROUSSET
  NOTRE-DAME-DU-HAMEL
  SAINT-PIERRE-DE-CERNIERES | 8.12.2022- 16.12.2022 |
| Département:Finistère (29) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01421
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01429 | CARANTEC
  GUICLAN
  LOCQUENOLE
  MESPAUL
  MORLAIX
  PLEYBER-CHRIST
  PLOUENAN
  PLOUEZOC’H
  PLOUGASNOU
  PLOUGOULM
  PLOUVORN
  SAINT MARTIN DES CHAMPS
  SAINT POL DE LEON
  SAINTE SEVE
  SAINT THEGONNEC
  TAULE | 16.12.2022 |
| HENVIC
  TAULE | 8.12.2022- 16.12.2022 |
| Département: Ille-et-Vilaine (35) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01419 | LONGAULNAY
  TREVERIEN
  SAINT PERN
  PLESDER
  SAINT THUAL
  MEDREAC à l’est de la RD 20 et au nord de la RD 220 | 3.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01418 | LA SELLE GUERCHAISE
  RANNEE
  DROUGES
  FORGES LA FORET
  CHELUN
  EANCE
  MARTIGNE-FERCHAUD | 9.12.2022 |
| RANNEE à l’est de la D95 et au sud des lignes de la belle etoile | 1.11.2022-9.12.2022 |
| | Département: Indre (36) | |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01412 | AIZE: Nord de D31
  BAUDRES
  BOUGES-LE-CHATEAU
  BRETAGNE
  BUXEUIL: Nord de D960
  FONTENAY
  GUILLY
  LA CHAPELLE-SAINT- LAURIAN
  LANGE: Est du Nahon
  LEVROUX: Nord D8
  LINIEZ: Ouest de A20
  MOULINS-SUR-CEPHONS: Nord D8
  ORVILLE: Ouest de D25
  POULAINES
  SAINT-FLORENTIN
  VALENCAY: Sud-Est du Nahon
  VICQ-SUR-NAHON: Est du Nahon | 9.12.2022 |
| AIZE: Sud de D31 et route entre Moulin Bailly et Aize
  BUXEUIL: Sud de D960
  ROUVRES LES BOIS | 1.12.2022- 9.12.2022 |
| Département: Landes (40) |
| FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00391 | AZUR
  CASTETS
  LEON
  LINXE
  MAGESCQ
  MESSANGES
  MOLIETS-ET-MAA
  VIELLE-SAINT-GIRONS | 25.12.2022 |
| LEON
  SAINT-MICHEL-ESCALUS | 17.12.2022 - 25.12.2022 |
| Département: Loiret (45) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01407
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01420
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01432 | AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BELLEGARDE
  BOUZY-LA-FORÊT
  CHÂTENOY
  CHEVILLON-SUR-HUILLARD
  COUDROY
  LA COUR-MARIGNY
  FRÉVILLE-DU-GÂTINAIS
  LADON
  LORRIS
  MÉZIÈRES-EN-GÂTINAIS
  MONTLIARD
  NESPLOY
  NOYERS
  OUZOUER-SOUS-BELLEGARDE
  PRESNOY
  QUIERS-SUR-BÉZONDE
  SURY-AUX-BOIS
  THIMORY
  VIEILLES-MAISONS-SUR-JOUDRY
  VILLEMOUTIERS
  AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BELLEGARDE
  BOUZY-LA-FORÊT
  CHÂTENOY
  CHEVILLON-SUR-HUILLARD
  COUDROY
  LA COUR-MARIGNY
  FRÉVILLE-DU-GÂTINAIS
  LADON
  LOMBREUIL
  LORRIS
  MÉZIÈRES-EN-GÂTINAIS
  MONTLIARD
  NESPLOY
  MONTEREAU
  - LE MOULINET-SUR-SOLIN
  OUSSOY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  OUZOUER-SOUS-BELLEGARDE
  PRESNOY
  QUIERS-SUR-BÉZONDE
  SAINT MAURICE SUR FRESSARD
  SURY-AUX-BOIS
  THIMORY
  VARENNES-CHANGY
  VIEILLES-MAISONS-SUR-JOUDRY
  VILLEMOUTIERS
  BELLEGARDE
  BOUZY-LA-FORÊT
  CHÂTENOY
  CHEVILLON-SUR-HUILLARD
  COUDROY
  LA COUR-MARIGNY
  FRÉVILLE-DU-GÂTINAIS
  LADON
  LOMBREUIL
  LORCY
  LORRIS
  MÉZIÈRES-EN-GÂTINAIS
  MONTLIARD
  MOULON
  NESPLOY
  MONTEREAU
  LE MOULINET-SUR-SOLIN
  OUSSOY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  OUZOUER-SOUS-BELLEGARDE
  PRESNOY
  QUIERS-SUR-BÉZONDE
  SAINT MAURICE SUR FRESSARD
  SURY-AUX-BOIS
  THIMORY
  VARENNES-CHANGY
  VIEILLES-MAISONS-SUR-JOUDRY
  VILLEMOUTIERS | 19.12.2022 |
| AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD
  CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  CHÂTENOY
  COUDROY
  AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD
  CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  CHÂTENOY
  COUDROY
  NOYERS
  AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD
  CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  CHÂTENOY
  COUDROY
  NOYERS | 11.12.2022- 19.12.2022 |
| Departement: Mayenne (53) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01418 | BALLOTS
  CONGRIER
  CUILLE
  GASTINES
  LA ROE
  LA SELLE-CRAONNAISE
  SAINT-ERBLON
  SAINT-MARTIN-DU-LIMET
  SAINT-SATURNIN-DU-LIMET
  SENONNES | 9.12.2022 |
| BRAINS-SUR-LES-MARCHES
  FONTAINE-COUVERTE
  LA ROUAUDIERE
  SAINT-AIGNAN-SUR-ROE
  SAINT-MICHEL-DE-LA-ROE | 1.12.2022 – 9.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01431 | BAIS
  BREE
  EVRON
  HAMBERS
  IZE
  JUBLAINS
  LIVET
  MEZANGERS
  MONTSURS
  NEAU
  SAINT-LEGER
  SAINTE-SUZANNE-ET-CHAMMES
  TORCE-VIVIERS-EN-CHARNIE
  VIMARTIN-SUR-ORTHE
  VOUTRE | 16.12.2022 |
| ASSE-LE-BERENGER
  EVRON
  SAINTE-GEMMES-LE-ROBERT
  SAINT-GEORGES-SUR-ERVE | 08.12.2022 -16.12.2022 |
| Departement: Morbihan (56) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01422
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01435 | BIGNAN – Commune entière
  BULEON – Commune entière
  CREDIN – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D11 jusqu’à Bellevue puis au sud de la route allant de Bellevue à Le Pont du redressement
  EVELLYS – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D767 jusqu’à Siviac puis au nord-ouest de la route allant à Naizin puis au nord de la D203
  KERFOURN – Partie de la commmune au sud de la route allant de Le Guéric à Le Lindreu
  LANTILLAC – Commune entière
  LOCMINE – Commune entière
  MOREAC – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D767 jusqu’à Porh Legal puis au sud de la D181 jusqu’à Keranna puis au sud de la route allant de Keranna à Kervalo en passant par Le Petit Kerimars, Bolcalpère et le Faouët d’En Haut
  MOUSTOIR-AC – Partie de la commune au nord de la route allant de Plumelin à Moustoir-Ac puis au nord de la D318 et à l’ouest de la D767
  PLEUGRIFFET – Commune entière
  PLUMELIAU-BIEUZY – Partie de la commune au sud de la D203 et à l’est de la route allant du bourg à Talhouet Avalec en passant par Kerjegu et Beau Soleil
  PLUMELIN – Partie de la commune au nord de la D117 jusqu’à Kerfourchec puis à l’est de la route allant à Moustoir-Ac
  RADENAC – Commune entière
  REGUINY – Partie de la commune au nord de la D203 jusqu’à Le Pont Saint Fiacre
  SAINT-ALLOUESTRE – Commune entière
  GUEGON – Partie de la commune au nord de la N24 entre Caradec et la Pointe puis à l’ouest de la D778
  GUEHENNO – Commune entière
  LANOUEE – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D778 jusqu’à la Bourdonnais puis au sud de la D764
  LES FORGES – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D778
  RADENAC -Partie de commune à l’est de la D11 | 22.12.2022 |
| EVELLYS -Partie de la commune à l’est de la D767 jusqu’à Siviac puis à l’est de la route allant à Naizin puis au sud de la D203
  MOREAC – Partie de la commune à l’est de la D767 jusqu’à Porh Legal puis au nord de la D181 jusqu’à Keranna puis au nord de la route allant de Keranna à Kervalo en passant par Le Petit Kerimars, Bolcalpère et le Faouët d’En Haut
  REGUINY – Partie de la commune au sud de la D203 jusqu’à Le Pont Saint Fiacre
  RADENAC -Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D11 | 14.12.2022 – 22.12.2022 |
| Département: Nord (59) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01423 | BAILLEUL
  ERQUINGHEM-LYS
  LA GORGUE
  MERRIS
  MERVILLE
  METEREN
  NIEPPE
  STRAZEELE
  VIEUX-BERQUIN | 17.12.2022 |
| NEUF-BERQUIN
  STEENWERCK
  ESTAIRES
  LE DOULIEU | 9.12.2022-17.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01434 | ALLENES-LES-MARAIS
  ANNOEULLIN
  BAILLEUL
  BAUVIN
  BEAUCAMPS-LIGNY
  BOIS-GRENIER
  DON
  ERQUINGHEM-LE-SEC
  ERQUINGHEM-LYS
  ESCOBECQUES
  FOURNES-EN-WEPPES
  FROMELLES
  HALLENNE-LES-HAUBOURDIN
  HANTAY
  LA BASSEE
  LA GORGUE
  LE MAISNIL
  MARQUILLIES
  MERRIS
  MERVILLE
  METEREN
  NIEPPE
  PROVIN
  RADINGHEM-EN-WEPPES
  SAINGHIN-EN-WEPPES
  SALOME
  STRAZEELE
  VIEUX-BERQUIN
  WAVRIN
  WICRES | 20.12.2022 |
| NEUF-BERQUIN
  STEENWERCK
  ESTAIRES
  LE DOULIEU
  AUBERS
  HERLIES
  ILLIES | 12.12.2022- 20.12.2022 |
| Département: Orne (61) |
| FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00339
  FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00342 | AVERNES-SAINT-GOURGON
  CANAPVILLE
  CHAUMONT
  COUDEHARD
  CROISILLES
  CROUTTES
  ECORCHES
  GACE
  LE BOSC-RENOULT
  LES CHAMPEAUX
  LE RENOUARD
  LA FERTE-EN-OUCHE
  MENIL-HUBERT-EN-OUCHE
  MONT-ORMEL
  NEAUPHE-SUR-DIVE
  PONTCHARDON
  RESENLIEU
  SAINT-EVROULT-DE-MONTFORT
  SAINT-GERMAIN-D’AUNAY
  SAINT-LAMBERT-SUR-DIVE
  VIMOUTIERS | 7.12.2022 |
| AUBRY-LE-PANTHOU
  CAMEMBERT
  CHAMPOSOULT
  LA FRESNAIE-FAYEL
  FRESNAY-LE-SAMSON
  GUERQUESALLES
  MARDILLY
  NEUVILLE-SUR-TOUQUES
  ROIVILLE
  SAP-EN-AUGE
  GUFFERN-EN-AUGE zone nord au-dessus de la D14, puis D16 entre Le bourg Saint-Léonard et Chambois et D3 jusqu’à la limite de la commune
  TICHEVILLE | 29.11.2022 –7.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00354 | LA FERTE-EN-OUCHE
  LA GONFRIERE
  SAINT-NICOLAS-DE-SOMMAIRE | 16.12.2022 |
| Département: Pas-de-Calais (62) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01427 | AMES
  AMETTES
  ANNEZIN
  AUCHEL
  AUCHY-AU-BOIS
  AUMERVAL
  BAILLEUL-LES-PERNES
  BARLIN
  BETHUNE
  BEUGIN
  BOURECQ
  BEUVRY
  BRUAY-LA-BUISSIERE
  BUSNES
  CALONNE-RICOUART
  CALONNE-SUR-LA-LYS
  CAMBLAIN-CHATELAIN
  CAUCHY-A-LA-TOUR
  DIEVAL
  DIVION
  DROUVIN-LE-MARAIS
  ECQUEDECQUES
  ESSARS
  FERFAY
  FLEURBAIX
  FLORINGHEM
  FOUQUEREUIL
  FOUQUIERES-LES-BETHUNES
  GOSNAY
  GUARBECQUE
  HAILLICOURT
  HAM-EN-ARTOIS
  HESDIGNEUL-LES-BETHUNE
  HINGES
  HOUCHIN
  HOUDAIN
  ISBERGUES
  LA COUTURE
  LAVENTIE
  LESPESSES
  LESTREM
  LIERES
  LOCON
  LORGIES
  MAISNIL-LES-RUITZ
  MAREST
  MARLES-LES-MINES
  MAZINGHEM
  MONT-BERNANCHON
  NEUVE-CHAPELLE
  NORRENT-FONTES
  OBLINGHEM
  OURTON
  PERNES
  PRESSY
  REBREUVE-RANCHICOURT
  RICHEBOURG
  ROBECQ
  RUITZ
  SAILLY-SUR-LA-LYS
  SAINT-FLORIS
  SAINT-HILAIRE-COTTES
  SAINT -VENANT
  VAUDRICOURT
  VENDIN-LES-BETHUNE
  VERQUIGNEUL
  VERQUIN
  VIEILLE-CHAPELLE | 19.12.2022 |
| ALLOUAGNE
  BURBURE
  CHOQUES
  GONNEHEM
  LABEUVRIERE
  LAPUGNOY
  LILLERS
  LOZINGHEM | 11.12.2022 – 19.12.2022 |
| Département: Seine-et-Marne (77) |
| FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00304 | BAILLY-ROMAINVILLIERS
  BUSSY-SAINT-GEORGES
  BUSSY-SAINT-MARTIN
  CHALIFERT
  CHANTELOUP-EN-BRIE
  LES CHAPELLES-BOURBON
  CHATRES
  CHESSY
  CHEVRY-COSSIGNY
  COLLEGIEN
  CONCHEN-SUR-GONDOIRE
  COUPVRAY
  COUTEVROULT
  CRECY-LA-CHAPELLE
  CREVECOEUR-EN-BRIE
  CROISSY-BEAUBOURG
  DAMMARTIN-SUR-TIGEAUX
  FAVIERES
  FERRIERES-EN-BRIE
  FONTENAY-TRESIGNY
  GOUVERNES
  GRETZ-ARMAINVILLIERS
  GUERARD
  GUERMANTES
  LA HOUSSAYE-EN-BRIE
  JOSSIGNY
  LAGNY-SUR-MARNE
  LIVERDY-EN-BRIE
  MAGNY-LE-HONGRE
  MARLES-EN-BRIE
  MONTEVRAIN
  MONTRY
  MORTCERF
  NEUFMOUTIERS-EN-BRIE
  OZOIR-LA-FERRIERE
  PONTCARRE
  PRESLES-EN-BRIE
  ROISSY-EN-BRIE
  SAINT-GERMAIN-SUR-MORIN
  SERRIS
  TIGEAUX
  TOURNAN-EN-BRIE
  VILLENEUVE-LE-COMTE
  VILLENEUVE-SAINT-DENIS
  VILLIERS-SUR-MORIN
  VOULANGIS | 6.12.2022 |
| FAVIERES
  JOSSIGNY
  NEUFMOUTIERS EN BRIE
  VILLENEUVE LE COMTE
  VUILLENEUVE EN BRIE | 28.11.2022 – 6.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01403 | ANDREZEL
  AUBEPIERRE-OZOUER-LE-REPOS
  BLANDY
  BOMBON
  BREAU
  CHAMPEAUX
  LA CHAPELLE-GAUTHIER
  LA CHAPELLE-RABLAIS
  LE CHATELET-EN-BRIE
  CHATILLON-LA-BORDE
  CLOS-FONTAINE
  COURPALAY
  COUTENCON
  LA CROIX-EN-BRIE
  ECHOUBOULAINS
  LES ECRENNES
  FONTAINS
  FONTENAILLES
  GASTINS
  GRANDPUITS-BAILLY-CARROIS
  LAVAL-EN-BRIE
  MACHAULT
  MORMANT
  NANGIS
  PAMFOU
  QUIERS
  RAMPILLON
  SAINT-MERY
  SAINT-OUEN-EN-BRIE
  SIVRY-COURTRY
  VALENCE-EN-BRIE
  VILLENEUVE-LES-BORDES | 1.12.2022 |
| BOMBON
  LA CHAPELLE-GAUTHIER
  LA CHAPELLE-RABLAIS
  FONTENAILLES
  GRANDPUITS-BAILLY-CARROIS
  NANGIS
  SAINT-OUEN-EN-BRIE | 23.11.2022 -1.12.2022 |
| Département: Deux-Sèvres (79) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01408
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01410
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01411
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01415
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01414
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01417
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01430
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01436
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01428 | ADILLY
  AMAILLOUX
  ARDIN
  BECELEUF
  LE BEUGNON
  LE BREUIL-BERNARD
  CHANTELOUP
  LA CHAPELLE-SAINT-LAURENT
  LA CHAPELLE-THIREUIL
  CHICHE
  CLESSÉ
  FÉNERY
  FENIOUX
  LA FORÊT-SUR-SÈVRE
  MONCOUTANT
  MOUTIERS-SOUS-CHANTEMERLE
  NEUVY-BOUIN
  POUGNE-HÉRISSON
  PUGNY
  PUIHARDY
  SAINT-AUBIN-LE-CLOUD
  SAINT-GERMAIN-DE-LONGUE-CHAUME
  SAINT-LAURS
  SAINT-POMPAIN
  SCILLÉ
  SECONDIGNY
  VILLIERS-EN-PLAINE | 7.12.2022 |
| L’ABSIE
  LE BUSSEAU
  LA CHAPELLE-SAINT-ETIENNE
  COULONGES-SUR-L’AUTIZE
  LARGEASSE
  SAINT-MAIXENT-DE-BEUGNE
  SAINT-PAUL-EN-GATINE
  TRAYES
  VERNOUX-EN-GATINE | 29.11.2022 – 7.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397
  FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01408 | COULONGES-SUR-L’AUTIZE
  SAINT-MAIXENT-DE-BEUGNE | 30.11.2022 – 7.12.2022 |
| Département: Somme (80) |
| | BACOUEL-SUR-SELLE
  BLANGY-TRONVILLE
  CAMON
  COTTENCHY
  DOMMARTIN
  ESTREES-SUR-NOYE
  FOSSEMANANT
  FOUENCAMPS
  GENTELLES (à l’ouest des rues Faidherbe, Leopold Jouancoux et de la voie communale n°204 de Gentelles à Daours)
  GLISY
  GRATTEPANCHE
  GUYENCOURT-SUR-NOYE
  HEBECOURT
  JUMEL
  LAMOTTE-BREBIERE
  LONGUEAU
  NAMPTY
  ORESMAUX
  PLACHY-BUYON
  PONT-DE-METZ
  PROUZEL
  REMIENCOURT
  RIVERY
  RUMIGNY
  SAINT-SAUFLIEU
  SALEUX
  SALOUEL
  SAVEUSE
  THEZY-GLIMONT
  VERS-SUR-SELLE | 21.12.2022 |
| | AMIENS
  BOVES
  CAGNY
  DURY
  SAINS-EN-AMIENOIS
  SAINT-FUSCIEN | 13.12.2022-21.12.2022 |
| Département: Tarn (81) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01433 | ARTHES
  AUSSAC
  BERNAC
  BRENS
  CADALEN
  CAGNAC-LES-MINES
  CAMBON
  CASTANET
  CESTAYROLS
  CUNAC
  DENAT
  FAYSSAC
  FENOLS
  FLORENTIN
  FREJAIROLLES
  LE GARRIC
  LABASTIDE-DE-LEVIS
  LAGRAVE
  LAMILLARIE
  LASGRAISSES
  LESCURE-D’ALBIGEOIS
  LOMBERS
  MAILHOC
  ORBAN
  POULAN-POUZOLS
  PUYGOUZON
  RIVIERES
  SAINT-JUERY
  SALIES
  SENOUILLAC
  SIEURAC
  TAIX
  VILLENEUVE-SUR-VERE
  SAINTE-CROIX | 20.12.2022 |
| ALBI
  CARLUS
  CASTELNAU-DE-LEVIS
  MARSSAC-SUR-TARN
  ROUFFIAC
  LE SEQUESTRE
  TERSSAC | 12.12.2022-20.12.2022 |
| Département: Vendée (85) |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397 | SAINT HILAIRE DES LOGES au sud de la D745
  FOUSSAIS PAYRE a l’ouest de la D49
  FAYMOREAU
  MARILLET
  ANTIGNY
  BOURNEAU
  CEZAIS
  FONTENAY-LE-COMTE
  L’ORBRIE
  LA CHATAIGNERAIE
  LA TARDIERE
  LOGE-FOUGEREUSE
  MARSAIS-SAINTE-RADEGONDE
  SAINT-MARTIN-DE-FRAIGNEAU
  SAINT-MAURICE-DES-NOUES
  SAINT-PIERRE-DU-CHEMIN
  SERIGNE
  PISSOTTE
  MARVENT
  NIEUL-SUR-L’AUTISTE
  PUY-DE-SERRE
  SAINT-HILAIRE-DE-VOUST
  VOUVANT
  SAINT-MICHEL-LE-CLOUCQ
  XANTON-CHASSENON | 1.12.2022 |
| SAINT HILAIRE DES LOGES au nord de la D745
  FOUSSAIS PAYRE à l’est de la D49 | 23.11.2022 – 1.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01410 | BREUIL-BARRET
  LA CHAPELLE-AUX-LYS
  LOGE-FOUGEREUSE
  SAINT-HILAIRE-DE-VOUST | 23.11.2022 – 1.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01409 | CHAMPAGNE-LES-MARAIS
  LUCON
  MOREILLES
  PUYRAVAULT
  SAINTE-DEMME-LA-PLAINE
  SAINTE-RADEGONDE-DES-NOYERS | 19.11.2022 – 9.12.2022 |
| FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01416 | BREM-SUR-MER
  BRETIGNOLLES-SUR-MER
  COEX
  GIVRAND
  LA CHAIZE-GIRAUD
  LA CHAPELLE-HERMIER
  L’AIUGUILLON-SUR-VIE
  LES ACHARDS
  L’ILE-D’OLONNE
  MARTINET
  OLONNE-SUR-MER
  SAINTE-FOY
  SAINT-GEORGES-DES-POINTINDOUX
  SAINT-JULIEN-DES-LANDES
  SAINT-MATHURIN
  SAINT-REVEREND | 6.12.2022 |
| BREM-SUR-MER
  LANDEVIEILLE
  SAINT-JULIEN-DES-LANDES
  VAIRE | 28.11.2022 – 6.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Département: Côtes-d’Armor (22)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01406

GOMENÉ

LANRELAS

LAURENAN

MERDRIGNAC

LE MENÉ

PLÉNÉE-JUGON

ROUILLAC

SEVIGNAC

TRÉMOREL

2.12.2022

ÉRÉAC

MÉRILLAC

MERDRIGNAC

LE MENÉ

SAINT-VRAN

SAINT-LAUNEUC

24.11.2022 – 2.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01413

PLERIN

SAINT-BRIEUC

PLOUFRAGAN

TREGUEUX

PLEDRAN

YFFINIAC

QUESSOY

POMMERET

LAMBALLE

COETMIEUX

ANDEL

MORIEUX

PLANGUENOUAL

7.12.2022

HILLION

LANGUEUX

29.11.2022 – 7.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01419

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01425

BOBITAL

BRUSVILY

CAULNES

DINAN

EVRAN

GUENROC

GUITTE

LANVALLAY

LE HINGLE

LES CHAMPS-GERAUX

PLOUASNE

PLUMAUDAN

SAINT-CARNE

SAINT-JUDOCE

TRELIVAN

YVIGNAC-LA-TOUR

17.12.2022

CALORGUEN

EVRAN

LE QUIOU

SAINT-ANDRE-DES-EAUX

SAINT-JUVAT

SAINT-MADEN

TREFUMEL

TREVRON

9.12.2022- 17.12.2022

Département: Eure (27)

FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00354

MESNIL-EN-OUCHE (partie ouest/D49)

LES BOTTEREAUX

CHAMBLAC

CHAMBORD

LA GOULAFRIERE

JUIGNETTES

MONTREUIL-L’ARGILLE

SAINT-AGNAN-DE-CERNIERES

SAINT-DENIS-D’AUGERONS

SAINT-LAURENT-DU-TENCEMENT

LA TRINITE-DE-REVILLE

VERNEUSSES

16.12.2022

LA HAYE-SAINT-SYLVESTRE

MELICOURT

MESNIL-ROUSSET

NOTRE-DAME-DU-HAMEL

SAINT-PIERRE-DE-CERNIERES

8.12.2022- 16.12.2022

Département:Finistère (29)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01421

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01429

CARANTEC

GUICLAN

LOCQUENOLE

MESPAUL

MORLAIX

PLEYBER-CHRIST

PLOUENAN

PLOUEZOC’H

PLOUGASNOU

PLOUGOULM

PLOUVORN

SAINT MARTIN DES CHAMPS

SAINT POL DE LEON

SAINTE SEVE

SAINT THEGONNEC

TAULE

16.12.2022

HENVIC

TAULE

8.12.2022- 16.12.2022

Département: Ille-et-Vilaine (35)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01419

LONGAULNAY

TREVERIEN

SAINT PERN

PLESDER

SAINT THUAL

MEDREAC à l’est de la RD 20 et au nord de la RD 220

3.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01418

LA SELLE GUERCHAISE

RANNEE

DROUGES

FORGES LA FORET

CHELUN

EANCE

MARTIGNE-FERCHAUD

9.12.2022

RANNEE à l’est de la D95 et au sud des lignes de la belle etoile

1.11.2022-9.12.2022

Département: Indre (36)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01412

AIZE: Nord de D31

BAUDRES

BOUGES-LE-CHATEAU

BRETAGNE

BUXEUIL: Nord de D960

FONTENAY

GUILLY

LA CHAPELLE-SAINT- LAURIAN

LANGE: Est du Nahon

LEVROUX: Nord D8

LINIEZ: Ouest de A20

MOULINS-SUR-CEPHONS: Nord D8

ORVILLE: Ouest de D25

POULAINES

SAINT-FLORENTIN

VALENCAY: Sud-Est du Nahon

VICQ-SUR-NAHON: Est du Nahon

9.12.2022

AIZE: Sud de D31 et route entre Moulin Bailly et Aize

BUXEUIL: Sud de D960

ROUVRES LES BOIS

1.12.2022- 9.12.2022

Département: Landes (40)

FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00391

AZUR

CASTETS

LEON

LINXE

MAGESCQ

MESSANGES

MOLIETS-ET-MAA

VIELLE-SAINT-GIRONS

25.12.2022

LEON

SAINT-MICHEL-ESCALUS

17.12.2022 - 25.12.2022

Département: Loiret (45)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01407

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01420

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01432

AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS

BELLEGARDE

BOUZY-LA-FORÊT

CHÂTENOY

CHEVILLON-SUR-HUILLARD

COUDROY

LA COUR-MARIGNY

FRÉVILLE-DU-GÂTINAIS

LADON

LORRIS

MÉZIÈRES-EN-GÂTINAIS

MONTLIARD

NESPLOY

NOYERS

OUZOUER-SOUS-BELLEGARDE

PRESNOY

QUIERS-SUR-BÉZONDE

SURY-AUX-BOIS

THIMORY

VIEILLES-MAISONS-SUR-JOUDRY

VILLEMOUTIERS

AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS

BELLEGARDE

BOUZY-LA-FORÊT

CHÂTENOY

CHEVILLON-SUR-HUILLARD

COUDROY

LA COUR-MARIGNY

FRÉVILLE-DU-GÂTINAIS

LADON

LOMBREUIL

LORRIS

MÉZIÈRES-EN-GÂTINAIS

MONTLIARD

NESPLOY

MONTEREAU

- LE MOULINET-SUR-SOLIN

OUSSOY-EN-GÂTINAIS

OUZOUER-SOUS-BELLEGARDE

PRESNOY

QUIERS-SUR-BÉZONDE

SAINT MAURICE SUR FRESSARD

SURY-AUX-BOIS

THIMORY

VARENNES-CHANGY

VIEILLES-MAISONS-SUR-JOUDRY

VILLEMOUTIERS

BELLEGARDE

BOUZY-LA-FORÊT

CHÂTENOY

CHEVILLON-SUR-HUILLARD

COUDROY

LA COUR-MARIGNY

FRÉVILLE-DU-GÂTINAIS

LADON

LOMBREUIL

LORCY

LORRIS

MÉZIÈRES-EN-GÂTINAIS

MONTLIARD

MOULON

NESPLOY

MONTEREAU

LE MOULINET-SUR-SOLIN

OUSSOY-EN-GÂTINAIS

OUZOUER-SOUS-BELLEGARDE

PRESNOY

QUIERS-SUR-BÉZONDE

SAINT MAURICE SUR FRESSARD

SURY-AUX-BOIS

THIMORY

VARENNES-CHANGY

VIEILLES-MAISONS-SUR-JOUDRY

VILLEMOUTIERS

19.12.2022

AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS

BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD

CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS

CHÂTENOY

COUDROY

AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS

BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD

CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS

CHÂTENOY

COUDROY

NOYERS

AUVILLIERS-EN-GÂTINAIS

BEAUCHAMPS-SUR-HUILLARD

CHAILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS

CHÂTENOY

COUDROY

NOYERS

11.12.2022- 19.12.2022

Departement: Mayenne (53)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01418

BALLOTS

CONGRIER

CUILLE

GASTINES

LA ROE

LA SELLE-CRAONNAISE

SAINT-ERBLON

SAINT-MARTIN-DU-LIMET

SAINT-SATURNIN-DU-LIMET

SENONNES

9.12.2022

BRAINS-SUR-LES-MARCHES

FONTAINE-COUVERTE

LA ROUAUDIERE

SAINT-AIGNAN-SUR-ROE

SAINT-MICHEL-DE-LA-ROE

1.12.2022 – 9.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01431

BAIS

BREE

EVRON

HAMBERS

IZE

JUBLAINS

LIVET

MEZANGERS

MONTSURS

NEAU

SAINT-LEGER

SAINTE-SUZANNE-ET-CHAMMES

TORCE-VIVIERS-EN-CHARNIE

VIMARTIN-SUR-ORTHE

VOUTRE

16.12.2022

ASSE-LE-BERENGER

EVRON

SAINTE-GEMMES-LE-ROBERT

SAINT-GEORGES-SUR-ERVE

08.12.2022 -16.12.2022

Departement: Morbihan (56)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01422

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01435

BIGNAN – Commune entière

BULEON – Commune entière

CREDIN – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D11 jusqu’à Bellevue puis au sud de la route allant de Bellevue à Le Pont du redressement

EVELLYS – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D767 jusqu’à Siviac puis au nord-ouest de la route allant à Naizin puis au nord de la D203

KERFOURN – Partie de la commmune au sud de la route allant de Le Guéric à Le Lindreu

LANTILLAC – Commune entière

LOCMINE – Commune entière

MOREAC – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D767 jusqu’à Porh Legal puis au sud de la D181 jusqu’à Keranna puis au sud de la route allant de Keranna à Kervalo en passant par Le Petit Kerimars, Bolcalpère et le Faouët d’En Haut

MOUSTOIR-AC – Partie de la commune au nord de la route allant de Plumelin à Moustoir-Ac puis au nord de la D318 et à l’ouest de la D767

PLEUGRIFFET – Commune entière

PLUMELIAU-BIEUZY – Partie de la commune au sud de la D203 et à l’est de la route allant du bourg à Talhouet Avalec en passant par Kerjegu et Beau Soleil

PLUMELIN – Partie de la commune au nord de la D117 jusqu’à Kerfourchec puis à l’est de la route allant à Moustoir-Ac

RADENAC – Commune entière

REGUINY – Partie de la commune au nord de la D203 jusqu’à Le Pont Saint Fiacre

SAINT-ALLOUESTRE – Commune entière

GUEGON – Partie de la commune au nord de la N24 entre Caradec et la Pointe puis à l’ouest de la D778

GUEHENNO – Commune entière

LANOUEE – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D778 jusqu’à la Bourdonnais puis au sud de la D764

LES FORGES – Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D778

RADENAC -Partie de commune à l’est de la D11

22.12.2022

EVELLYS -Partie de la commune à l’est de la D767 jusqu’à Siviac puis à l’est de la route allant à Naizin puis au sud de la D203

MOREAC – Partie de la commune à l’est de la D767 jusqu’à Porh Legal puis au nord de la D181 jusqu’à Keranna puis au nord de la route allant de Keranna à Kervalo en passant par Le Petit Kerimars, Bolcalpère et le Faouët d’En Haut

REGUINY – Partie de la commune au sud de la D203 jusqu’à Le Pont Saint Fiacre

RADENAC -Partie de la commune à l’ouest de la D11

14.12.2022 – 22.12.2022

Département: Nord (59)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01423

BAILLEUL

ERQUINGHEM-LYS

LA GORGUE

MERRIS

MERVILLE

METEREN

NIEPPE

STRAZEELE

VIEUX-BERQUIN

17.12.2022

NEUF-BERQUIN

STEENWERCK

ESTAIRES

LE DOULIEU

9.12.2022-17.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01434

ALLENES-LES-MARAIS

ANNOEULLIN

BAILLEUL

BAUVIN

BEAUCAMPS-LIGNY

BOIS-GRENIER

DON

ERQUINGHEM-LE-SEC

ERQUINGHEM-LYS

ESCOBECQUES

FOURNES-EN-WEPPES

FROMELLES

HALLENNE-LES-HAUBOURDIN

HANTAY

LA BASSEE

LA GORGUE

LE MAISNIL

MARQUILLIES

MERRIS

MERVILLE

METEREN

NIEPPE

PROVIN

RADINGHEM-EN-WEPPES

SAINGHIN-EN-WEPPES

SALOME

STRAZEELE

VIEUX-BERQUIN

WAVRIN

WICRES

20.12.2022

NEUF-BERQUIN

STEENWERCK

ESTAIRES

LE DOULIEU

AUBERS

HERLIES

ILLIES

12.12.2022- 20.12.2022

Département: Orne (61)

FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00339

FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00342

AVERNES-SAINT-GOURGON

CANAPVILLE

CHAUMONT

COUDEHARD

CROISILLES

CROUTTES

ECORCHES

GACE

LE BOSC-RENOULT

LES CHAMPEAUX

LE RENOUARD

LA FERTE-EN-OUCHE

MENIL-HUBERT-EN-OUCHE

MONT-ORMEL

NEAUPHE-SUR-DIVE

PONTCHARDON

RESENLIEU

SAINT-EVROULT-DE-MONTFORT

SAINT-GERMAIN-D’AUNAY

SAINT-LAMBERT-SUR-DIVE

VIMOUTIERS

7.12.2022

AUBRY-LE-PANTHOU

CAMEMBERT

CHAMPOSOULT

LA FRESNAIE-FAYEL

FRESNAY-LE-SAMSON

GUERQUESALLES

MARDILLY

NEUVILLE-SUR-TOUQUES

ROIVILLE

SAP-EN-AUGE

GUFFERN-EN-AUGE zone nord au-dessus de la D14, puis D16 entre Le bourg Saint-Léonard et Chambois et D3 jusqu’à la limite de la commune

TICHEVILLE

29.11.2022 –7.12.2022

FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00354

LA FERTE-EN-OUCHE

LA GONFRIERE

SAINT-NICOLAS-DE-SOMMAIRE

16.12.2022

Département: Pas-de-Calais (62)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01427

AMES

AMETTES

ANNEZIN

AUCHEL

AUCHY-AU-BOIS

AUMERVAL

BAILLEUL-LES-PERNES

BARLIN

BETHUNE

BEUGIN

BOURECQ

BEUVRY

BRUAY-LA-BUISSIERE

BUSNES

CALONNE-RICOUART

CALONNE-SUR-LA-LYS

CAMBLAIN-CHATELAIN

CAUCHY-A-LA-TOUR

DIEVAL

DIVION

DROUVIN-LE-MARAIS

ECQUEDECQUES

ESSARS

FERFAY

FLEURBAIX

FLORINGHEM

FOUQUEREUIL

FOUQUIERES-LES-BETHUNES

GOSNAY

GUARBECQUE

HAILLICOURT

HAM-EN-ARTOIS

HESDIGNEUL-LES-BETHUNE

HINGES

HOUCHIN

HOUDAIN

ISBERGUES

LA COUTURE

LAVENTIE

LESPESSES

LESTREM

LIERES

LOCON

LORGIES

MAISNIL-LES-RUITZ

MAREST

MARLES-LES-MINES

MAZINGHEM

MONT-BERNANCHON

NEUVE-CHAPELLE

NORRENT-FONTES

OBLINGHEM

OURTON

PERNES

PRESSY

REBREUVE-RANCHICOURT

RICHEBOURG

ROBECQ

RUITZ

SAILLY-SUR-LA-LYS

SAINT-FLORIS

SAINT-HILAIRE-COTTES

SAINT -VENANT

VAUDRICOURT

VENDIN-LES-BETHUNE

VERQUIGNEUL

VERQUIN

VIEILLE-CHAPELLE

19.12.2022

ALLOUAGNE

BURBURE

CHOQUES

GONNEHEM

LABEUVRIERE

LAPUGNOY

LILLERS

LOZINGHEM

11.12.2022 – 19.12.2022

Département: Seine-et-Marne (77)

FR-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00304

BAILLY-ROMAINVILLIERS

BUSSY-SAINT-GEORGES

BUSSY-SAINT-MARTIN

CHALIFERT

CHANTELOUP-EN-BRIE

LES CHAPELLES-BOURBON

CHATRES

CHESSY

CHEVRY-COSSIGNY

COLLEGIEN

CONCHEN-SUR-GONDOIRE

COUPVRAY

COUTEVROULT

CRECY-LA-CHAPELLE

CREVECOEUR-EN-BRIE

CROISSY-BEAUBOURG

DAMMARTIN-SUR-TIGEAUX

FAVIERES

FERRIERES-EN-BRIE

FONTENAY-TRESIGNY

GOUVERNES

GRETZ-ARMAINVILLIERS

GUERARD

GUERMANTES

LA HOUSSAYE-EN-BRIE

JOSSIGNY

LAGNY-SUR-MARNE

LIVERDY-EN-BRIE

MAGNY-LE-HONGRE

MARLES-EN-BRIE

MONTEVRAIN

MONTRY

MORTCERF

NEUFMOUTIERS-EN-BRIE

OZOIR-LA-FERRIERE

PONTCARRE

PRESLES-EN-BRIE

ROISSY-EN-BRIE

SAINT-GERMAIN-SUR-MORIN

SERRIS

TIGEAUX

TOURNAN-EN-BRIE

VILLENEUVE-LE-COMTE

VILLENEUVE-SAINT-DENIS

VILLIERS-SUR-MORIN

VOULANGIS

6.12.2022

FAVIERES

JOSSIGNY

NEUFMOUTIERS EN BRIE

VILLENEUVE LE COMTE

VUILLENEUVE EN BRIE

28.11.2022 – 6.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01403

ANDREZEL

AUBEPIERRE-OZOUER-LE-REPOS

BLANDY

BOMBON

BREAU

CHAMPEAUX

LA CHAPELLE-GAUTHIER

LA CHAPELLE-RABLAIS

LE CHATELET-EN-BRIE

CHATILLON-LA-BORDE

CLOS-FONTAINE

COURPALAY

COUTENCON

LA CROIX-EN-BRIE

ECHOUBOULAINS

LES ECRENNES

FONTAINS

FONTENAILLES

GASTINS

GRANDPUITS-BAILLY-CARROIS

LAVAL-EN-BRIE

MACHAULT

MORMANT

NANGIS

PAMFOU

QUIERS

RAMPILLON

SAINT-MERY

SAINT-OUEN-EN-BRIE

SIVRY-COURTRY

VALENCE-EN-BRIE

VILLENEUVE-LES-BORDES

1.12.2022

BOMBON

LA CHAPELLE-GAUTHIER

LA CHAPELLE-RABLAIS

FONTENAILLES

GRANDPUITS-BAILLY-CARROIS

NANGIS

SAINT-OUEN-EN-BRIE

23.11.2022 -1.12.2022

Département: Deux-Sèvres (79)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01408

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01410

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01411

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01415

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01414

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01417

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01430

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01436

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01428

ADILLY

AMAILLOUX

ARDIN

BECELEUF

LE BEUGNON

LE BREUIL-BERNARD

CHANTELOUP

LA CHAPELLE-SAINT-LAURENT

LA CHAPELLE-THIREUIL

CHICHE

CLESSÉ

FÉNERY

FENIOUX

LA FORÊT-SUR-SÈVRE

MONCOUTANT

MOUTIERS-SOUS-CHANTEMERLE

NEUVY-BOUIN

POUGNE-HÉRISSON

PUGNY

PUIHARDY

SAINT-AUBIN-LE-CLOUD

SAINT-GERMAIN-DE-LONGUE-CHAUME

SAINT-LAURS

SAINT-POMPAIN

SCILLÉ

SECONDIGNY

VILLIERS-EN-PLAINE

7.12.2022

L’ABSIE

LE BUSSEAU

LA CHAPELLE-SAINT-ETIENNE

COULONGES-SUR-L’AUTIZE

LARGEASSE

SAINT-MAIXENT-DE-BEUGNE

SAINT-PAUL-EN-GATINE

TRAYES

VERNOUX-EN-GATINE

29.11.2022 – 7.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01408

COULONGES-SUR-L’AUTIZE

SAINT-MAIXENT-DE-BEUGNE

30.11.2022 – 7.12.2022

Département: Somme (80)

BACOUEL-SUR-SELLE

BLANGY-TRONVILLE

CAMON

COTTENCHY

DOMMARTIN

ESTREES-SUR-NOYE

FOSSEMANANT

FOUENCAMPS

GENTELLES (à l’ouest des rues Faidherbe, Leopold Jouancoux et de la voie communale n°204 de Gentelles à Daours)

GLISY

GRATTEPANCHE

GUYENCOURT-SUR-NOYE

HEBECOURT

JUMEL

LAMOTTE-BREBIERE

LONGUEAU

NAMPTY

ORESMAUX

PLACHY-BUYON

PONT-DE-METZ

PROUZEL

REMIENCOURT

RIVERY

RUMIGNY

SAINT-SAUFLIEU

SALEUX

SALOUEL

SAVEUSE

THEZY-GLIMONT

VERS-SUR-SELLE

21.12.2022

AMIENS

BOVES

CAGNY

DURY

SAINS-EN-AMIENOIS

SAINT-FUSCIEN

13.12.2022-21.12.2022

Département: Tarn (81)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01433

ARTHES

AUSSAC

BERNAC

BRENS

CADALEN

CAGNAC-LES-MINES

CAMBON

CASTANET

CESTAYROLS

CUNAC

DENAT

FAYSSAC

FENOLS

FLORENTIN

FREJAIROLLES

LE GARRIC

LABASTIDE-DE-LEVIS

LAGRAVE

LAMILLARIE

LASGRAISSES

LESCURE-D’ALBIGEOIS

LOMBERS

MAILHOC

ORBAN

POULAN-POUZOLS

PUYGOUZON

RIVIERES

SAINT-JUERY

SALIES

SENOUILLAC

SIEURAC

TAIX

VILLENEUVE-SUR-VERE

SAINTE-CROIX

20.12.2022

ALBI

CARLUS

CASTELNAU-DE-LEVIS

MARSSAC-SUR-TARN

ROUFFIAC

LE SEQUESTRE

TERSSAC

12.12.2022-20.12.2022

Département: Vendée (85)

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01397

SAINT HILAIRE DES LOGES au sud de la D745

FOUSSAIS PAYRE a l’ouest de la D49

FAYMOREAU

MARILLET

ANTIGNY

BOURNEAU

CEZAIS

FONTENAY-LE-COMTE

L’ORBRIE

LA CHATAIGNERAIE

LA TARDIERE

LOGE-FOUGEREUSE

MARSAIS-SAINTE-RADEGONDE

SAINT-MARTIN-DE-FRAIGNEAU

SAINT-MAURICE-DES-NOUES

SAINT-PIERRE-DU-CHEMIN

SERIGNE

PISSOTTE

MARVENT

NIEUL-SUR-L’AUTISTE

PUY-DE-SERRE

SAINT-HILAIRE-DE-VOUST

VOUVANT

SAINT-MICHEL-LE-CLOUCQ

XANTON-CHASSENON

1.12.2022

SAINT HILAIRE DES LOGES au nord de la D745

FOUSSAIS PAYRE à l’est de la D49

23.11.2022 – 1.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01410

BREUIL-BARRET

LA CHAPELLE-AUX-LYS

LOGE-FOUGEREUSE

SAINT-HILAIRE-DE-VOUST

23.11.2022 – 1.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01409

CHAMPAGNE-LES-MARAIS

LUCON

MOREILLES

PUYRAVAULT

SAINTE-DEMME-LA-PLAINE

SAINTE-RADEGONDE-DES-NOYERS

19.11.2022 – 9.12.2022

FR-HPAI(P)-2022-01416

BREM-SUR-MER

BRETIGNOLLES-SUR-MER

COEX

GIVRAND

LA CHAIZE-GIRAUD

LA CHAPELLE-HERMIER

L’AIUGUILLON-SUR-VIE

LES ACHARDS

L’ILE-D’OLONNE

MARTINET

OLONNE-SUR-MER

SAINTE-FOY

SAINT-GEORGES-DES-POINTINDOUX

SAINT-JULIEN-DES-LANDES

SAINT-MATHURIN

SAINT-REVEREND

6.12.2022

BREM-SUR-MER

LANDEVIEILLE

SAINT-JULIEN-DES-LANDES

VAIRE

28.11.2022 – 6.12.2022

Member State: Croatia

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Grad Zagreb |
| HR-HPAI(P)-2022-00007 | — | gradske četvrti Podsused-Vrapče i Stenjevec |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Grad Zagreb

HR-HPAI(P)-2022-00007

—

gradske četvrti Podsused-Vrapče i Stenjevec

15.12.2022

| — | gradske četvrti Brezovica i Novi Zagreb- zapad |
| --- | --- |

—

gradske četvrti Brezovica i Novi Zagreb- zapad

7.12.2022-15.12.2022

Zagrebačka županija

HR-HPAI(P)-2022-00007

| — | općina Jastrebarsko, naselje Stankovo; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Jastrebarsko, naselje Stankovo;

| — | općina Klinča Sela, naselja Beter, Donja Purgarija, Donja Zdenčina, Goli Vrh, Gonjeva, Gornja Purgarija, Gornja Zdenčina, Klinča Sela, Kozlikovo, Kupinec, Novo Selo Okičko, Poljanica Okićka, Repišće i Tržić; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Klinča Sela, naselja Beter, Donja Purgarija, Donja Zdenčina, Goli Vrh, Gonjeva, Gornja Purgarija, Gornja Zdenčina, Klinča Sela, Kozlikovo, Kupinec, Novo Selo Okičko, Poljanica Okićka, Repišće i Tržić;

| — | općina Pisarovina, naselje Bratina; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Pisarovina, naselje Bratina;

| — | općina Samobor, naselja Celine Samoborske, Cerje Samoborsko, Dolec Podokićki, Domaslovec, Drežnik Podokićki, Falašćak, Farkaševec Samoborski, Galgovo, Gradna, Hrastina Samoborska, Kladje, Klake, Konšćica, Mala Rakovica, Medsave, Molvice, Pavučnjak, Petkov Breg, Podgrađe Podokićko, Samobor, Savršćak, Slavagora, Sveti Martin pod Okićem, Velika Rakovica i Vrbovec Samoborski; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Samobor, naselja Celine Samoborske, Cerje Samoborsko, Dolec Podokićki, Domaslovec, Drežnik Podokićki, Falašćak, Farkaševec Samoborski, Galgovo, Gradna, Hrastina Samoborska, Kladje, Klake, Konšćica, Mala Rakovica, Medsave, Molvice, Pavučnjak, Petkov Breg, Podgrađe Podokićko, Samobor, Savršćak, Slavagora, Sveti Martin pod Okićem, Velika Rakovica i Vrbovec Samoborski;

| — | općina Sveta Nedjelja, naselja Bestovje, Brezje, Jagnjić Dol, Novaki, Orešje, Rakitje, Srebrnjak, Strmec, Sveta Nedjelja i Svetonedeljski Breg; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Sveta Nedjelja, naselja Bestovje, Brezje, Jagnjić Dol, Novaki, Orešje, Rakitje, Srebrnjak, Strmec, Sveta Nedjelja i Svetonedeljski Breg;

| — | općina Zaprešić, naselja Šibice, Ivanec Bistranski i Zaprešić. |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Zaprešić, naselja Šibice, Ivanec Bistranski i Zaprešić.

15.12.2022

| — | općina Samobor, naselje Rakov potok; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Samobor, naselje Rakov potok;

| — | općina Stupnik, naselja Donji Stupnik, Gornji Stupnik i Stupnički Obrež; |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Stupnik, naselja Donji Stupnik, Gornji Stupnik i Stupnički Obrež;

| — | općina Sveta Nedjelja, naselja Kalinovica, Kerestinec, Mala Gorica i Žitarka. |
| --- | --- |

—

općina Sveta Nedjelja, naselja Kalinovica, Kerestinec, Mala Gorica i Žitarka.

7.12.2022-15.12.2022

Member State: Italy

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Region: Veneto |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00029 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.753972, E12.149041 | 4.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.753972, E12.149041 | 26.11.2022 – 4.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00031 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.9193668, E12.4351595 | 3.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.9193668, E12.4351595 | 25.11.2022 – 3.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00033 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.211179, E11.272346 | 8.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.211179, E11.272346 | 30.11.2022 – 8.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00034 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.221390806, E11.04331334 | 11.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.221390806, E11.04331334 | 3.12.2022 – 11.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00036 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.771464, E12.147417 | 8.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.771464, E12.147417 | 30.11.2022-8.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00037 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.741660, E12.452298 | 7.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.741660, E12.452298 | 29.11.2022-7.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00039 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.964074644, E12.282057809 | 15.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.964074644, E12.282057809 | 7.12.2022-15.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00040 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.233473, E11.657231 | 10.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.233473, E11.657231 | 2.12.2022-10.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00042 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.296865835, E10.878880005 | 13.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.296865835, E10.878880005 | 5.12.2022 – 13.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00043 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates | 12.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.504494974, E12.616275373 | 4.12.2022 – 12.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00045 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.380764707, E11.07799142 | 19.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.380764707, E11.07799142 | 11.12.2022 – 19.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00047 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.966036, E12.305402 | 22.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.966036, E12.305402 | 14.12.2022 – 22.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00048 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.393604155, E11.098068838 | 19.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.393604155, E11.098068838 | 11.12.2022 – 19.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00050 | The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.074265, E11.604144 | 27.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.074265, E11.604144 | 19.12.2022 – 27.12.2022 |
| Region: Lombardia |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00030 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.098875, E8.81998199999998 | 30.11.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.098875, E8.81998199999998 | 22.11.2022 – 30.11.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00032 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.049383, E10.35708 | 8.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.049383, E10.35708 | 30.11.2022 – 8.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00041 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.040236, E10.36325 | 12.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.040236, E10.36325 | 4.12.2022 – 12.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00046 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.033964, E10.302944 | 25.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.033964, E10.302944 | 17.12.2022 – 25.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00051 | The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.073379, E10.367887 | 8.01.2023 |
| The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.073379, E10.367887 | 31.12. 2022 –8.01.2023 |
| Region: Emilia Romagna |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00028 | The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.714462, E11.926653 | 29.11.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.714462, E11.926653 | 21.11.2022 – 29.11.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00044 | The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.79259, E10. 930896 | 14.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.79259, E10. 930896 | 6.12.2022 – 14.12.2022 |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00049 | The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.873686, E11.336651 | 20.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.873686, E11.336651 | 12.12.2022-20.12.2022 |
| Region: Friuli Venezia Giulia |
| IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00035 | The area of the parts of Friuli Venezia Giulia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.962481, E12.606420 | 5.12.2022 |
| The area of the parts of Friuli Venezia Giulia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.962481, E12.606420 | 27.11.2022-5.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Region: Veneto

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00029

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.753972, E12.149041

4.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.753972, E12.149041

26.11.2022 – 4.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00031

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.9193668, E12.4351595

3.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.9193668, E12.4351595

25.11.2022 – 3.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00033

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.211179, E11.272346

8.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.211179, E11.272346

30.11.2022 – 8.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00034

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.221390806, E11.04331334

11.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.221390806, E11.04331334

3.12.2022 – 11.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00036

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.771464, E12.147417

8.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.771464, E12.147417

30.11.2022-8.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00037

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.741660, E12.452298

7.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.741660, E12.452298

29.11.2022-7.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00039

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.964074644, E12.282057809

15.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.964074644, E12.282057809

7.12.2022-15.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00040

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.233473, E11.657231

10.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.233473, E11.657231

2.12.2022-10.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00042

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.296865835, E10.878880005

13.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.296865835, E10.878880005

5.12.2022 – 13.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00043

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates

12.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.504494974, E12.616275373

4.12.2022 – 12.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00045

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.380764707, E11.07799142

19.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.380764707, E11.07799142

11.12.2022 – 19.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00047

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.966036, E12.305402

22.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.966036, E12.305402

14.12.2022 – 22.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00048

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.393604155, E11.098068838

19.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.393604155, E11.098068838

11.12.2022 – 19.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00050

The area of the parts of Veneto Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.074265, E11.604144

27.12.2022

The area of the parts of Veneto Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.074265, E11.604144

19.12.2022 – 27.12.2022

Region: Lombardia

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00030

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.098875, E8.81998199999998

30.11.2022

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.098875, E8.81998199999998

22.11.2022 – 30.11.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00032

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.049383, E10.35708

8.12.2022

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.049383, E10.35708

30.11.2022 – 8.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00041

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.040236, E10.36325

12.12.2022

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.040236, E10.36325

4.12.2022 – 12.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00046

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.033964, E10.302944

25.12.2022

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.033964, E10.302944

17.12.2022 – 25.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00051

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.073379, E10.367887

8.01.2023

The area of the parts of Lombardia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.073379, E10.367887

31.12. 2022 –8.01.2023

Region: Emilia Romagna

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00028

The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.714462, E11.926653

29.11.2022

The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.714462, E11.926653

21.11.2022 – 29.11.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00044

The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.79259, E10. 930896

14.12.2022

The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.79259, E10. 930896

6.12.2022 – 14.12.2022

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00049

The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.873686, E11.336651

20.12.2022

The area of the parts of Emilia Romagna Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N44.873686, E11.336651

12.12.2022-20.12.2022

Region: Friuli Venezia Giulia

IT-HPAI(P)-2022-00035

The area of the parts of Friuli Venezia Giulia Region extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of ten kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.962481, E12.606420

5.12.2022

The area of the parts of Friuli Venezia Giulia Region contained within a circle of radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N45.962481, E12.606420

27.11.2022-5.12.2022

Member State: Hungary

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bács-Kiskun, Békés és Csongrád-Csanád megye |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00211 – 00269 | Ágasegyháza, Balotaszállás, Bócsa, Borota, Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Csengőd, Csólyospálos, Felsőszentiván, Fülöpjakab, Gátér, Harkakötöny, Helvécia, Imrehegy, Izsák, Jakabszállás, Jánoshalma, Jászszentlászló, Kaskantyú, Kéleshalom, Kiskunfélegyháza, Kiskunhalas, Kiskunmajsa, Kisszállás, Kömpöc, Kunfehértó, Kunszállás, Mélykút, Móricgát, Orgovány, Páhi, Pálmonostora, Petőfiszállás, Pirtó, Soltvadkert, Szank, Tabdi, Tataháza, Tázlár, Tiszaalpár, Városföld, Zsana, Békéssámson, Csanádapáca, Kardoskút, Kaszaper, Mezőhegyes, Mezőkovácsháza, Nagybánhegyes, Orosháza, Pusztaföldvár, Tótkomlós, Végegyháza, Algyő, Ambrózfalva, Árpádhalom, Baks, Balástya, Bordány, Csanytelek, Csengele, Csongrád, Derekegyház, Dóc, Domaszék, Fábiánsebestyén, Felgyő, Forráskút, Hódmezővásárhely, Kistelek, Mártély, Mindszent, Nagyér, Nagymágocs, Nagytőke, Ópusztaszer, Pusztamérges, Pusztaszer, Ruzsa, Sándorfalva, Szatymaz, Szeged, Szegvár, Székkutas, Szentes, Tömörkény, Üllés, Zákányszék és Zsombó települések védőkörzeten kívül eső teljes közigazgatási területe.
  Kecskemét település közigazgatási területének a 46.686318 és a 19.661755, valamint a 46.695600 és a 19.681280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.
  Kiskőrös település közigazgatási területének 46.56342697 és a 19.47272301 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00211
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00216
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00219
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00225 | Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Fülöpjakab, Jakabszállás és Móricgát települések települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.67844 és 19.65301 és a 46.679183 és a 19.663134, 46.686318 és a 19.661755, valamint a 46.695600 és a 19.681280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 8.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00212
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00217
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00226
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00229-00230
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00233-00235
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00237-00242
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00244
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00247-00251
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00256-00259
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00262
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00265 | Csólyospálos, Harkakötöny, Jászszentlászló, Kiskunhalas, Kiskunmajsa, Kömpöc, Móricgát Szank és Zsana települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.489980 és a 19.772640, a 46.544237 és a 19.741665, a 46.569793 és a 19.692088, a 46.494360 és a 19.781250, a 46.517887 és a 19.678431, a 46.465166 és a 19.753716, a 46.540082 és a 19.646619, a 46.491690 és a 19.689880, a 46.559267 és a 19.683815, a 46.457070 és a 19.620880, 46.511456 és a 19.726186, a 46.493138 és a 19.690420, a 46.485781 és a 19.676447, a 46.499678 és a 19.687294, a 46.484707 és a 19.693469, a 46.537062 és a 19.727489, a 46.520024 és a 19.725265, a 46.532441 és a 19.644402, a 46.545107 és a 19.702540, a 46.543879 és a 19.700779, a 46.556750 és a 19.783380, a 46.460140 és a 19.480575, a 46.469155 és a 19.769960, a 46.525178 és a 19.618940, a 46.566283 és a 19.627354, valamint a 46.497336 és a 19.775280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 22.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00215
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00218
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00220-00221
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00223-00224
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00227-00228
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00231-00232
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00252 | Bócsa és Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Kakantyú, Orgovány és Szank települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.627319 és a 19.536083, 46.626416 és a 19.545777, a 46.630891 és a 19.536630, a 46.619573 és a 19.537445, a 46.622916 és a 19.537992, a 46.645837 és a 19.513270, a 46.640484 és a 19.524528, a 46.641252 és a 19.532421, a 46.616930 és a 19.545510, a 46.673759 és a 19.497050, valamint a 46.618622 és a 19.536336 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 16.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00236
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00243
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00245
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00253
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00255
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00260-00261
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00263-00264 | Csólyospálos és Kömpöc települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.387300 és a 19.862000, a 46.449825 és a 19.874751, a 46.442671 és a 19.844208, a 46.442530 és a 19.847300, a 46.457047 és a 19.878295, a 46.457105 és a 19.878381, a 46.446674 és a 19.842729, a 46.432070 és a 19.844230, a 46.417660 és a 19.855820, valamint a 46.279380 és a 19.344527 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 22.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00238 | Harkakötöny, Kiskunhalas és Kiksunmajsa települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.457070 és a 19.620880 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 14.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00246 | Kispáhi és Orgovány települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.735284 és a 19.458263 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 16.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00254 | Bócsa, Soltvadkert és Tázlár települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.563426 és a 19.472723 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 26.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00257 | Kiskunhalas település közigazgatási területének a 46.460140 és a 19.480575 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 19.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00267 | Kiskunfélegyháza, Pálmonostora és Petőfiszállás települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.633607 és a 19.891596 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 24.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00268 | Jánoshalma és Mélykút települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.279380 és a 19.344527 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 24.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00213 | Algyő, Sándorfalva és Szeged települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.353600 és a 20.173300 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 4.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00214
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00222 | Szentes település közigazgatási területének 46.647079 és a 20.325001, valamint a 46.664455 és a 20.294252 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 4.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00229
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00256
  HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00265 | Csengele település közigazgatási területének a 46.494360 és a 19.781250, a 46.556750 és a 19.783380, valamint a 46.497336 és a 19.775280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 22.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00266 | Bordány, Forráskút és Üllés Szeged települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.359048 és a 19.888786 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 22.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |
| HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00269 | Kaszaper és Tótkomlós települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.437833 és a 20.778503 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe. | 23.12.2022 – 3.1.2023 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Bács-Kiskun, Békés és Csongrád-Csanád megye

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00211 – 00269

Ágasegyháza, Balotaszállás, Bócsa, Borota, Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Csengőd, Csólyospálos, Felsőszentiván, Fülöpjakab, Gátér, Harkakötöny, Helvécia, Imrehegy, Izsák, Jakabszállás, Jánoshalma, Jászszentlászló, Kaskantyú, Kéleshalom, Kiskunfélegyháza, Kiskunhalas, Kiskunmajsa, Kisszállás, Kömpöc, Kunfehértó, Kunszállás, Mélykút, Móricgát, Orgovány, Páhi, Pálmonostora, Petőfiszállás, Pirtó, Soltvadkert, Szank, Tabdi, Tataháza, Tázlár, Tiszaalpár, Városföld, Zsana, Békéssámson, Csanádapáca, Kardoskút, Kaszaper, Mezőhegyes, Mezőkovácsháza, Nagybánhegyes, Orosháza, Pusztaföldvár, Tótkomlós, Végegyháza, Algyő, Ambrózfalva, Árpádhalom, Baks, Balástya, Bordány, Csanytelek, Csengele, Csongrád, Derekegyház, Dóc, Domaszék, Fábiánsebestyén, Felgyő, Forráskút, Hódmezővásárhely, Kistelek, Mártély, Mindszent, Nagyér, Nagymágocs, Nagytőke, Ópusztaszer, Pusztamérges, Pusztaszer, Ruzsa, Sándorfalva, Szatymaz, Szeged, Szegvár, Székkutas, Szentes, Tömörkény, Üllés, Zákányszék és Zsombó települések védőkörzeten kívül eső teljes közigazgatási területe.

Kecskemét település közigazgatási területének a 46.686318 és a 19.661755, valamint a 46.695600 és a 19.681280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

Kiskőrös település közigazgatási területének 46.56342697 és a 19.47272301 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 10 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00211

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00216

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00219

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00225

Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Fülöpjakab, Jakabszállás és Móricgát települések települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.67844 és 19.65301 és a 46.679183 és a 19.663134, 46.686318 és a 19.661755, valamint a 46.695600 és a 19.681280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

8.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00212

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00217

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00226

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00229-00230

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00233-00235

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00237-00242

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00244

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00247-00251

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00256-00259

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00262

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00265

Csólyospálos, Harkakötöny, Jászszentlászló, Kiskunhalas, Kiskunmajsa, Kömpöc, Móricgát Szank és Zsana települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.489980 és a 19.772640, a 46.544237 és a 19.741665, a 46.569793 és a 19.692088, a 46.494360 és a 19.781250, a 46.517887 és a 19.678431, a 46.465166 és a 19.753716, a 46.540082 és a 19.646619, a 46.491690 és a 19.689880, a 46.559267 és a 19.683815, a 46.457070 és a 19.620880, 46.511456 és a 19.726186, a 46.493138 és a 19.690420, a 46.485781 és a 19.676447, a 46.499678 és a 19.687294, a 46.484707 és a 19.693469, a 46.537062 és a 19.727489, a 46.520024 és a 19.725265, a 46.532441 és a 19.644402, a 46.545107 és a 19.702540, a 46.543879 és a 19.700779, a 46.556750 és a 19.783380, a 46.460140 és a 19.480575, a 46.469155 és a 19.769960, a 46.525178 és a 19.618940, a 46.566283 és a 19.627354, valamint a 46.497336 és a 19.775280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

22.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00215

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00218

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00220-00221

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00223-00224

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00227-00228

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00231-00232

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00252

Bócsa és Bugac, Bugacpusztaháza, Kakantyú, Orgovány és Szank települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.627319 és a 19.536083, 46.626416 és a 19.545777, a 46.630891 és a 19.536630, a 46.619573 és a 19.537445, a 46.622916 és a 19.537992, a 46.645837 és a 19.513270, a 46.640484 és a 19.524528, a 46.641252 és a 19.532421, a 46.616930 és a 19.545510, a 46.673759 és a 19.497050, valamint a 46.618622 és a 19.536336 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

16.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00236

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00243

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00245

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00253

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00255

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00260-00261

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00263-00264

Csólyospálos és Kömpöc települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.387300 és a 19.862000, a 46.449825 és a 19.874751, a 46.442671 és a 19.844208, a 46.442530 és a 19.847300, a 46.457047 és a 19.878295, a 46.457105 és a 19.878381, a 46.446674 és a 19.842729, a 46.432070 és a 19.844230, a 46.417660 és a 19.855820, valamint a 46.279380 és a 19.344527 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

22.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00238

Harkakötöny, Kiskunhalas és Kiksunmajsa települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.457070 és a 19.620880 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

14.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00246

Kispáhi és Orgovány települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.735284 és a 19.458263 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

16.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00254

Bócsa, Soltvadkert és Tázlár települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.563426 és a 19.472723 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

26.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00257

Kiskunhalas település közigazgatási területének a 46.460140 és a 19.480575 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

19.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00267

Kiskunfélegyháza, Pálmonostora és Petőfiszállás települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.633607 és a 19.891596 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

24.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00268

Jánoshalma és Mélykút települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.279380 és a 19.344527 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

24.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00213

Algyő, Sándorfalva és Szeged települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.353600 és a 20.173300 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

4.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00214

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00222

Szentes település közigazgatási területének 46.647079 és a 20.325001, valamint a 46.664455 és a 20.294252 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

4.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00229

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00256

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00265

Csengele település közigazgatási területének a 46.494360 és a 19.781250, a 46.556750 és a 19.783380, valamint a 46.497336 és a 19.775280 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

22.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00266

Bordány, Forráskút és Üllés Szeged települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.359048 és a 19.888786 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

22.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

HU-HPAI(P)-2022-00269

Kaszaper és Tótkomlós települések közigazgatási területeinek a 46.437833 és a 20.778503 GPS-koordináták által meghatározott pont körüli 3 km sugarú körön belül eső területe.

23.12.2022 – 3.1.2023

Member State: The Netherlands

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Municipality Noardeast-Fryslân, province Friesland |
| NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00083 | 1. | Via Koaiwei naar Koaisreed |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

Municipality Noardeast-Fryslân, province Friesland

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00083

1.

Via Koaiwei naar Koaisreed

| 2. | Via Koaisreed naar Uterwei |
| --- | --- |

2.

Via Koaisreed naar Uterwei

| 3. | Via Uterwei naar C.Schuurmanwei |
| --- | --- |

3.

Via Uterwei naar C.Schuurmanwei

| 4. | Via C.Schuurmanwei naar It Noard |
| --- | --- |

4.

Via C.Schuurmanwei naar It Noard

| 5. | Via It Noard naar Pypkewei |
| --- | --- |

5.

Via It Noard naar Pypkewei

| 6. | Via Pypkewei naar Efterwei |
| --- | --- |

6.

Via Pypkewei naar Efterwei

| 7. | Via Efterwei naar Legeloane |
| --- | --- |

7.

Via Efterwei naar Legeloane

| 8. | Via Legeloane naar It West |
| --- | --- |

8.

Via Legeloane naar It West

| 9. | Via It West naar Hamsterpein |
| --- | --- |

9.

Via It West naar Hamsterpein

| 10. | Via Hamsterpein naar De Kromelle |
| --- | --- |

10.

Via Hamsterpein naar De Kromelle

| 11. | Via De Kromelle naar De Sânnen |
| --- | --- |

11.

Via De Kromelle naar De Sânnen

| 12. | Via De Sânnen naar De Buorren |
| --- | --- |

12.

Via De Sânnen naar De Buorren

| 13. | Via De Buorren naar Tillewei |
| --- | --- |

13.

Via De Buorren naar Tillewei

| 14. | Via Tillewei naar Noarderein |
| --- | --- |

14.

Via Tillewei naar Noarderein

| 15. | Via Noarderein naar Lândyk |
| --- | --- |

15.

Via Noarderein naar Lândyk

| 16. | Via Lândyk naar Hege Dyk |
| --- | --- |

16.

Via Lândyk naar Hege Dyk

| 17. | Via Hege Dyk naar Jisteboerewei |
| --- | --- |

17.

Via Hege Dyk naar Jisteboerewei

| 18. | Via Jisteboerewei naar Miedwei |
| --- | --- |

18.

Via Jisteboerewei naar Miedwei

| 19. | Via Miedwei naar Tillewei |
| --- | --- |

19.

Via Miedwei naar Tillewei

| 20. | Via Tillewei naar De Meren |
| --- | --- |

20.

Via Tillewei naar De Meren

| 21. | Via De Meren naar Schoolstraat |
| --- | --- |

21.

Via De Meren naar Schoolstraat

| 22. | Via Schoolstraat naar Ieswei |
| --- | --- |

22.

Via Schoolstraat naar Ieswei

| 23. | Via Ieswei naar Rijksstraatweg |
| --- | --- |

23.

Via Ieswei naar Rijksstraatweg

| 24. | Via Rijksstraatweg naar Westersingel |
| --- | --- |

24.

Via Rijksstraatweg naar Westersingel

| 25. | Via Westersingel naar Zevenhuisterweg |
| --- | --- |

25.

Via Westersingel naar Zevenhuisterweg

| 26. | Via Zevenhuisterweg naar De Swette |
| --- | --- |

26.

Via Zevenhuisterweg naar De Swette

| 27. | Via De Swette naar Feintensloane |
| --- | --- |

27.

Via De Swette naar Feintensloane

| 28. | Via Feintensloane naar Mûnestrjitte |
| --- | --- |

28.

Via Feintensloane naar Mûnestrjitte

| 29. | Via Mûnestrjitte naar Ljiploane |
| --- | --- |

29.

Via Mûnestrjitte naar Ljiploane

| 30. | Via Ljiploane naar Lysterstrjitte |
| --- | --- |

30.

Via Ljiploane naar Lysterstrjitte

| 31. | Via Lysterstrjitte naar Haadstrjitte |
| --- | --- |

31.

Via Lysterstrjitte naar Haadstrjitte

| 32. | Via Haadstrjitte naar Muontsewei |
| --- | --- |

32.

Via Haadstrjitte naar Muontsewei

| 33. | Via Muontsewei naar Achterwei |
| --- | --- |

33.

Via Muontsewei naar Achterwei

| 34. | Via Achterwei naar Claercamp |
| --- | --- |

34.

Via Achterwei naar Claercamp

| 35. | Via Claercamp naar Johanneswâld |
| --- | --- |

35.

Via Claercamp naar Johanneswâld

| 36. | Via Johanneswâld naar Eslawâld |
| --- | --- |

36.

Via Johanneswâld naar Eslawâld

| 37. | Via Eslawâld naar Bûtefjild |
| --- | --- |

37.

Via Eslawâld naar Bûtefjild

| 38. | Via Bûtefjild naar Boargemaster Nautawei |
| --- | --- |

38.

Via Bûtefjild naar Boargemaster Nautawei

| 39. | Via Boargemaster Nautawei naar Schwartzenbergloane |
| --- | --- |

39.

Via Boargemaster Nautawei naar Schwartzenbergloane

| 40. | Via Schwartzenbergloane naar Singel |
| --- | --- |

40.

Via Schwartzenbergloane naar Singel

| 41. | Via Singel naar Hearewei |
| --- | --- |

41.

Via Singel naar Hearewei

| 42. | Via Hearewei naar De Kapelle |
| --- | --- |

42.

Via Hearewei naar De Kapelle

| 43. | Via De Kapelle naar Melkemawei |
| --- | --- |

43.

Via De Kapelle naar Melkemawei

| 44. | Via Melkemawei naar Trekwei |
| --- | --- |

44.

Via Melkemawei naar Trekwei

| 45. | Via Trekwei naar Burdaarderstrjitwei |
| --- | --- |

45.

Via Trekwei naar Burdaarderstrjitwei

| 46. | Via Burdaarderstrjitwei naar Birdaarderstraatweg |
| --- | --- |

46.

Via Burdaarderstrjitwei naar Birdaarderstraatweg

| 47. | Via Birdaarderstraatweg naar Rondweg-West |
| --- | --- |

47.

Via Birdaarderstraatweg naar Rondweg-West

| 48. | Via Rondweg-West naar Rondweg-Noord |
| --- | --- |

48.

Via Rondweg-West naar Rondweg-Noord

| 49. | Via Rondweg-Noord naar Hantumerweg |
| --- | --- |

49.

Via Rondweg-Noord naar Hantumerweg

| 50. | Via Hantumerweg naar Hantumerwei |
| --- | --- |

50.

Via Hantumerweg naar Hantumerwei

| 51. | Via Hantumerwei naar Dokkumerwei |
| --- | --- |

51.

Via Hantumerwei naar Dokkumerwei

| 52. | Via Dokkumerwei naar Fennewei |
| --- | --- |

52.

Via Dokkumerwei naar Fennewei

| 53. | Via Fennewei naar Bangawei |
| --- | --- |

53.

Via Fennewei naar Bangawei

| 54. | Via Bangawei naar Loubuorren |
| --- | --- |

54.

Via Bangawei naar Loubuorren

| 55. | Via Loubuorren naar Wierumerwei |
| --- | --- |

55.

Via Loubuorren naar Wierumerwei

| 56. | Via Wierumerwei naar Dongerawei |
| --- | --- |

56.

Via Wierumerwei naar Dongerawei

| 57. | Via Dongerawei naar Bollingwier |
| --- | --- |

57.

Via Dongerawei naar Bollingwier

| 58. | Via Bollingwier naar Dongerawei |
| --- | --- |

58.

Via Bollingwier naar Dongerawei

| 59. | Via Dongerawei naar De Lyts Ein |
| --- | --- |

59.

Via Dongerawei naar De Lyts Ein

| 60. | Via De Lyts Ein naar De Buorren |
| --- | --- |

60.

Via De Lyts Ein naar De Buorren

| 61. | Via De Buorren naar Langgrousterwei |
| --- | --- |

61.

Via De Buorren naar Langgrousterwei

| 62. | Via Langgrousterwei naar Grytsjewei |
| --- | --- |

62.

Via Langgrousterwei naar Grytsjewei

| 63. | Via Grytsjewei naar Doarpsstrjitte |
| --- | --- |

63.

Via Grytsjewei naar Doarpsstrjitte

| 64. | Via Doarpsstrjitte naar Siniastrjitte |
| --- | --- |

64.

Via Doarpsstrjitte naar Siniastrjitte

| 65. | Via Siniastrjitte naar Dyksterwei |
| --- | --- |

65.

Via Siniastrjitte naar Dyksterwei

| 66. | Via Dyksterwei naar Boltawei |
| --- | --- |

66.

Via Dyksterwei naar Boltawei

| 67. | Via Boltawei naar Skânserwei |
| --- | --- |

67.

Via Boltawei naar Skânserwei

| 68. | Via Skânserwei naar Oostmahorn |
| --- | --- |

68.

Via Skânserwei naar Oostmahorn

| 69. | Via Oostmahorn naar Landgrens |
| --- | --- |

69.

Via Oostmahorn naar Landgrens

| 70. | Via Landgrens naar Steek Door |
| --- | --- |

70.

Via Landgrens naar Steek Door

| 71. | Via Steek Door naar Oude Robbengat |
| --- | --- |

71.

Via Steek Door naar Oude Robbengat

| 72. | Via Oude Robbengat naar Steek Door |
| --- | --- |

72.

Via Oude Robbengat naar Steek Door

| 73. | Via Steek Door naar Landgrens |
| --- | --- |

73.

Via Steek Door naar Landgrens

| 74. | Via Landgrens naar Steek Door |
| --- | --- |

74.

Via Landgrens naar Steek Door

| 75. | Via Steek Door naar Hooge Zuidwal |
| --- | --- |

75.

Via Steek Door naar Hooge Zuidwal

| 76. | Via Hooge Zuidwal naar Willem Van Der Ploegweg |
| --- | --- |

76.

Via Hooge Zuidwal naar Willem Van Der Ploegweg

| 77. | Via Willem Van Der Ploegweg naar Kwelderweg |
| --- | --- |

77.

Via Willem Van Der Ploegweg naar Kwelderweg

| 78. | Via Kwelderweg naar Nittersweg |
| --- | --- |

78.

Via Kwelderweg naar Nittersweg

| 79. | Via Nittersweg naar Olde Borchweg |
| --- | --- |

79.

Via Nittersweg naar Olde Borchweg

| 80. | Via Olde Borchweg naar Methardusstraat |
| --- | --- |

80.

Via Olde Borchweg naar Methardusstraat

| 81. | Via Methardusstraat naar Zijlstraat |
| --- | --- |

81.

Via Methardusstraat naar Zijlstraat

| 82. | Via Zijlstraat naar Stroomkanaal naar De Friese Sluis Te Zoutkamp |
| --- | --- |

82.

Via Zijlstraat naar Stroomkanaal naar De Friese Sluis Te Zoutkamp

| 83. | Via Stroomkanaal naar De Friese Sluis Te Zoutkamp naar Brugstraat |
| --- | --- |

83.

Via Stroomkanaal naar De Friese Sluis Te Zoutkamp naar Brugstraat

| 84. | Via Brugstraat naar Pieterzijlsterweg |
| --- | --- |

84.

Via Brugstraat naar Pieterzijlsterweg

| 85. | Via Pieterzijlsterweg naar Friesestraatweg |
| --- | --- |

85.

Via Pieterzijlsterweg naar Friesestraatweg

| 86. | Via Friesestraatweg naar Heirweg |
| --- | --- |

86.

Via Friesestraatweg naar Heirweg

| 87. | Via Heirweg naar Stationsweg |
| --- | --- |

87.

Via Heirweg naar Stationsweg

| 88. | Via Stationsweg naar Dorpsterweg |
| --- | --- |

88.

Via Stationsweg naar Dorpsterweg

| 89. | Via Dorpsterweg naar Miedweg |
| --- | --- |

89.

Via Dorpsterweg naar Miedweg

| 90. | Via Miedweg naar Miedwei |
| --- | --- |

90.

Via Miedweg naar Miedwei

| 91. | Via Miedwei naar Koaiwei |
| --- | --- |

91.

Via Miedwei naar Koaiwei

30.11.2022

Those parts of the municipality Noardeast-Fryslân contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 6.12 lat 53.3

22.11.2022 - 30.11.2022

Municipality Nederweert province Limburg

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00084

| 1. | via Heldensedijk naar Ophoven |
| --- | --- |

1.

via Heldensedijk naar Ophoven

| 2. | via Ophoven naar Op de bos |
| --- | --- |

2.

via Ophoven naar Op de bos

| 3. | via Op de bos naar Roggelseweg |
| --- | --- |

3.

via Op de bos naar Roggelseweg

| 4. | via Roggelseweg naar Speckerweg |
| --- | --- |

4.

via Roggelseweg naar Speckerweg

| 5. | via Speckerweg naar Piet Vossenweg |
| --- | --- |

5.

via Speckerweg naar Piet Vossenweg

| 6. | via Piet Vossenweg naar Professor Duboisweg |
| --- | --- |

6.

via Piet Vossenweg naar Professor Duboisweg

| 7. | via Professor Duboisweg naar Heythuyserweg |
| --- | --- |

7.

via Professor Duboisweg naar Heythuyserweg

| 8. | via Heythuyserweg naar Beekkant |
| --- | --- |

8.

via Heythuyserweg naar Beekkant

| 9. | via Beekkant naar Salmenhofweg |
| --- | --- |

9.

via Beekkant naar Salmenhofweg

| 10. | via Salmenhofweg naar Lozerweg |
| --- | --- |

10.

via Salmenhofweg naar Lozerweg

| 11. | via Lozerweg naar Dorpstraat |
| --- | --- |

11.

via Lozerweg naar Dorpstraat

| 12. | via Dorpstraat naar Rijksweg |
| --- | --- |

12.

via Dorpstraat naar Rijksweg

| 13. | via Rijksweg naar Kasteelweg |
| --- | --- |

13.

via Rijksweg naar Kasteelweg

| 14. | via Kasteelweg naar Abenhofweg |
| --- | --- |

14.

via Kasteelweg naar Abenhofweg

| 15. | via Abenhofweg naar Heiakker |
| --- | --- |

15.

via Abenhofweg naar Heiakker

| 16. | via Heiakker naar Hunselerdijk |
| --- | --- |

16.

via Heiakker naar Hunselerdijk

| 17. | via Hunselerdijk naar Grathemerweg |
| --- | --- |

17.

via Hunselerdijk naar Grathemerweg

| 18. | via Grathemerweg naar Velterweg |
| --- | --- |

18.

via Grathemerweg naar Velterweg

| 19. | via Velterweg naar Scheidingsweg |
| --- | --- |

19.

via Velterweg naar Scheidingsweg

| 20. | via Scheidingsweg naar Hoogstraat |
| --- | --- |

20.

via Scheidingsweg naar Hoogstraat

| 21. | via Hoogstraat naar Engerstraat |
| --- | --- |

21.

via Hoogstraat naar Engerstraat

| 22. | via Engerstraat naar Boggelerstraat |
| --- | --- |

22.

via Engerstraat naar Boggelerstraat

| 23. | via Boggelerstraat naar Moosterstraat |
| --- | --- |

23.

via Boggelerstraat naar Moosterstraat

| 24. | via Moosterstraat naar Roodvenweg |
| --- | --- |

24.

via Moosterstraat naar Roodvenweg

| 25. | via Roodvenweg naar Baldersstraat |
| --- | --- |

25.

via Roodvenweg naar Baldersstraat

| 26. | via Baldersstraat naar Castertstraat |
| --- | --- |

26.

via Baldersstraat naar Castertstraat

| 27. | via Castertstraat naar Pelmersheideweg |
| --- | --- |

27.

via Castertstraat naar Pelmersheideweg

| 28. | via Pelmersheideweg naar Tungeler Dorpsstraat |
| --- | --- |

28.

via Pelmersheideweg naar Tungeler Dorpsstraat

| 29. | via Tungeler Dorpsstraat naar Castertweg |
| --- | --- |

29.

via Tungeler Dorpsstraat naar Castertweg

| 30. | via Castertweg naar Grotehegsteeg |
| --- | --- |

30.

via Castertweg naar Grotehegsteeg

| 31. | via Grotehegsteeg naar Dijkerstraat |
| --- | --- |

31.

via Grotehegsteeg naar Dijkerstraat

| 32. | via Dijkerstraat naar Bocholterweg |
| --- | --- |

32.

via Dijkerstraat naar Bocholterweg

| 33. | via Bocholterweg naar Mastenbroekweg |
| --- | --- |

33.

via Bocholterweg naar Mastenbroekweg

| 34. | via Mastenbroekweg naar Altweerterkapelstraat |
| --- | --- |

34.

via Mastenbroekweg naar Altweerterkapelstraat

| 35. | via Altweerterkapelstraat naar Nelissenhofweg |
| --- | --- |

35.

via Altweerterkapelstraat naar Nelissenhofweg

| 36. | via Nelissenhofweg naar Uilenweg |
| --- | --- |

36.

via Nelissenhofweg naar Uilenweg

| 37. | via Uilenweg naar Industriekade |
| --- | --- |

37.

via Uilenweg naar Industriekade

| 38. | via Industriekade naar Beelenhofweg |
| --- | --- |

38.

via Industriekade naar Beelenhofweg

| 39. | via Beelenhofweg naar Oudesteeg |
| --- | --- |

39.

via Beelenhofweg naar Oudesteeg

| 40. | via Oudesteeg naar Beelenhofweg |
| --- | --- |

40.

via Oudesteeg naar Beelenhofweg

| 41. | via Beelenhofweg naar Koelebeemdweg |
| --- | --- |

41.

via Beelenhofweg naar Koelebeemdweg

| 42. | via Koelebeemdweg naar Hulsterdijk |
| --- | --- |

42.

via Koelebeemdweg naar Hulsterdijk

| 43. | via Hulsterdijk naar Groothulsterweg |
| --- | --- |

43.

via Hulsterdijk naar Groothulsterweg

| 44. | via Groothulsterweg naar Eindhovenseweg |
| --- | --- |

44.

via Groothulsterweg naar Eindhovenseweg

| 45. | via Eindhovenseweg naar Philipsweg |
| --- | --- |

45.

via Eindhovenseweg naar Philipsweg

| 46. | via Philipsweg naar Fazantlaan |
| --- | --- |

46.

via Philipsweg naar Fazantlaan

| 47. | via Fazantlaan naar De Hommelberg |
| --- | --- |

47.

via Fazantlaan naar De Hommelberg

| 48. | via De Hommelberg naar Koenraadtweg |
| --- | --- |

48.

via De Hommelberg naar Koenraadtweg

| 49. | via Koenraadtweg naar Hugten |
| --- | --- |

49.

via Koenraadtweg naar Hugten

| 50. | via Hugten naar fietspad |
| --- | --- |

50.

via Hugten naar fietspad

| 51. | via Fietspad naar Hugterweg |
| --- | --- |

51.

via Fietspad naar Hugterweg

| 52. | via Hugterweg naar Biezervenweg |
| --- | --- |

52.

via Hugterweg naar Biezervenweg

| 53. | via Biezervenweg naar Panweg |
| --- | --- |

53.

via Biezervenweg naar Panweg

| 54. | via Panweg naar Bosweg |
| --- | --- |

54.

via Panweg naar Bosweg

| 55. | via Bosweg naar Bergdijk |
| --- | --- |

55.

via Bosweg naar Bergdijk

| 56. | via Bergdijk naar Reigerstraat |
| --- | --- |

56.

via Bergdijk naar Reigerstraat

| 57. | via Reigerstraat naar Brandvenstraat |
| --- | --- |

57.

via Reigerstraat naar Brandvenstraat

| 58. | via Brandvenstraat naar Kraaiendijk |
| --- | --- |

58.

via Brandvenstraat naar Kraaiendijk

| 59. | via Kraaiendijk naar Brabantlaan |
| --- | --- |

59.

via Kraaiendijk naar Brabantlaan

| 60. | via Brabantlaan naar Smulderslaan |
| --- | --- |

60.

via Brabantlaan naar Smulderslaan

| 61. | via Smulderslaan naar Ploegstraat |
| --- | --- |

61.

via Smulderslaan naar Ploegstraat

| 62. | via Ploegstraat naar Hoeksestraat |
| --- | --- |

62.

via Ploegstraat naar Hoeksestraat

| 63. | via Hoeksestraat naar Heikomstraat |
| --- | --- |

63.

via Hoeksestraat naar Heikomstraat

| 64. | via Heikomstraat naar Boerenkamplaan |
| --- | --- |

64.

via Heikomstraat naar Boerenkamplaan

| 65. | via Boerenkamplaan naar Potakkerweg |
| --- | --- |

65.

via Boerenkamplaan naar Potakkerweg

| 66. | via Potakkerweg naar Broekstraat |
| --- | --- |

66.

via Potakkerweg naar Broekstraat

| 67. | via Broekstraat naar Steegstraat |
| --- | --- |

67.

via Broekstraat naar Steegstraat

| 68. | via Steegstraat naar Kanaaldijk-Noord |
| --- | --- |

68.

via Steegstraat naar Kanaaldijk-Noord

| 69. | via Kanaaldijk-Noord naar Akkerweg |
| --- | --- |

69.

via Kanaaldijk-Noord naar Akkerweg

| 70. | via Akkerweg naar Lage Akkerweg |
| --- | --- |

70.

via Akkerweg naar Lage Akkerweg

| 71. | via Lage Akkerweg naar Mortelweg |
| --- | --- |

71.

via Lage Akkerweg naar Mortelweg

| 72. | via Mortelweg naar Beemdstraat |
| --- | --- |

72.

via Mortelweg naar Beemdstraat

| 73. | via Beemdstraat naar Kanaalstraat |
| --- | --- |

73.

via Beemdstraat naar Kanaalstraat

| 74. | via Kanaalstraat naar Witvrouwenbergweg |
| --- | --- |

74.

via Kanaalstraat naar Witvrouwenbergweg

| 75. | via Witvrouwenbergweg naar Provincialeweg |
| --- | --- |

75.

via Witvrouwenbergweg naar Provincialeweg

| 76. | via Provincialeweg naar Heesakkerweg |
| --- | --- |

76.

via Provincialeweg naar Heesakkerweg

| 77. | via Heesakkerweg naar Voorste Heusden |
| --- | --- |

77.

via Heesakkerweg naar Voorste Heusden

| 78. | via Voorste Heusden naar Vlinkert |
| --- | --- |

78.

via Voorste Heusden naar Vlinkert

| 79. | via Vlinkert naar Patrijsweg |
| --- | --- |

79.

via Vlinkert naar Patrijsweg

| 80. | via Patrijsweg naar Pannenhoef |
| --- | --- |

80.

via Patrijsweg naar Pannenhoef

| 81. | via Pannenhoef naar Bleekerweg |
| --- | --- |

81.

via Pannenhoef naar Bleekerweg

| 82. | via Bleekerweg naar Zeilhoekweg |
| --- | --- |

82.

via Bleekerweg naar Zeilhoekweg

| 83. | via Zeilhoekweg naar Smientweg |
| --- | --- |

83.

via Zeilhoekweg naar Smientweg

| 84. | via Smientweg naar Roerdompweg |
| --- | --- |

84.

via Smientweg naar Roerdompweg

| 85. | via Roerdompweg naar Vlosbergweg |
| --- | --- |

85.

via Roerdompweg naar Vlosbergweg

| 86. | via Vlosbergweg naar Kleine Heitrak |
| --- | --- |

86.

via Vlosbergweg naar Kleine Heitrak

| 87. | via Kleine Heitrak naar Buizerdweg |
| --- | --- |

87.

via Kleine Heitrak naar Buizerdweg

| 88. | via Buizerdweg naar Heitrak |
| --- | --- |

88.

via Buizerdweg naar Heitrak

| 89. | via Heitrak naar Bospeelweg |
| --- | --- |

89.

via Heitrak naar Bospeelweg

| 90. | via Bospeelweg naar Grauwveenweg |
| --- | --- |

90.

via Bospeelweg naar Grauwveenweg

| 91. | via Grauwveenweg naar Kanaaldijk Oost |
| --- | --- |

91.

via Grauwveenweg naar Kanaaldijk Oost

| 92. | via Kanaaldijk Oost naar Kanaaldijk Noord |
| --- | --- |

92.

via Kanaaldijk Oost naar Kanaaldijk Noord

| 93. | via Kanaaldijk Noord naar Helenastraat |
| --- | --- |

93.

via Kanaaldijk Noord naar Helenastraat

| 94. | via Helenastraat naar Grashoekseweg |
| --- | --- |

94.

via Helenastraat naar Grashoekseweg

| 95. | via Grashoekseweg naar Helenaveenseweg |
| --- | --- |

95.

via Grashoekseweg naar Helenaveenseweg

| 96. | via Helenaveenseweg naar Belgenhoek |
| --- | --- |

96.

via Helenaveenseweg naar Belgenhoek

| 97. | via Belgenhoek naar Kievit |
| --- | --- |

97.

via Belgenhoek naar Kievit

| 98. | via Kievit naar Marisbaan |
| --- | --- |

98.

via Kievit naar Marisbaan

| 99. | via Marisbaan naar Kievit |
| --- | --- |

99.

via Marisbaan naar Kievit

| 100. | via Kievit naar Meijelseweg |
| --- | --- |

100.

via Kievit naar Meijelseweg

| 101. | via Meijelseweg naar Kanaalstraat |
| --- | --- |

101.

via Meijelseweg naar Kanaalstraat

| 102. | via Kanaalstraat naar Peelstraat |
| --- | --- |

102.

via Kanaalstraat naar Peelstraat

| 103. | via Peelstraat naar Heibloemseweg |
| --- | --- |

103.

via Peelstraat naar Heibloemseweg

| 104. | via Heibloemseweg naar Hondsheuvelstraat |
| --- | --- |

104.

via Heibloemseweg naar Hondsheuvelstraat

| 105. | via Hondsheuvelstraat naar Hub |
| --- | --- |

105.

via Hondsheuvelstraat naar Hub

| 106. | via Hub naar Hoekerstraat |
| --- | --- |

106.

via Hub naar Hoekerstraat

| 107. | via Hoekerstraat naar Jacobusstraat |
| --- | --- |

107.

via Hoekerstraat naar Jacobusstraat

| 108. | via Jacobusstraat naar Huiskensweg |
| --- | --- |

108.

via Jacobusstraat naar Huiskensweg

| 109. | via Huiskensweg naar Melkweg |
| --- | --- |

109.

via Huiskensweg naar Melkweg

| 110. | via Melkweg naar Roggelseweg |
| --- | --- |

110.

via Melkweg naar Roggelseweg

| 111. | via Roggelseweg naar Roggelsedijk |
| --- | --- |

111.

via Roggelseweg naar Roggelsedijk

| 112. | via Roggelsedijk naar Heldensedijk |
| --- | --- |

112.

via Roggelsedijk naar Heldensedijk

1.12.2022

Those parts of the municipality Nederweert contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 5.81, lat 51.3

23.11.2022- 1.12.2022

Municipality Maashorst province Noord-Brabant

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00085

| 1. | via Vinkelsestraat naar Ruitersweg-Oost |
| --- | --- |

1.

via Vinkelsestraat naar Ruitersweg-Oost

| 2. | via Ruitersweg-Oost naar Grolderseweg |
| --- | --- |

2.

via Ruitersweg-Oost naar Grolderseweg

| 3. | via Grolderseweg naar Wijststraat |
| --- | --- |

3.

via Grolderseweg naar Wijststraat

| 4. | via Wijststraat naar Leliestraat |
| --- | --- |

4.

via Wijststraat naar Leliestraat

| 5. | via Leliestraat naar Binnenweg |
| --- | --- |

5.

via Leliestraat naar Binnenweg

| 6. | via Binnenweg naar Schoonstraat |
| --- | --- |

6.

via Binnenweg naar Schoonstraat

| 7. | via Schoonstraat naar fietspad |
| --- | --- |

7.

via Schoonstraat naar fietspad

| 8. | via fietspad volgend in oostelijke richting overgaand in noordelijke richting naar de Kropaar |
| --- | --- |

8.

via fietspad volgend in oostelijke richting overgaand in noordelijke richting naar de Kropaar

| 9. | via de Kropaar naar de Ploeg |
| --- | --- |

9.

via de Kropaar naar de Ploeg

| 10. | via de Ploeg naar Nistelrodeseweg |
| --- | --- |

10.

via de Ploeg naar Nistelrodeseweg

| 11. | via Nistelrodeseweg naar Landerstraat |
| --- | --- |

11.

via Nistelrodeseweg naar Landerstraat

| 12. | via Landerstraat naar Bosstraat |
| --- | --- |

12.

via Landerstraat naar Bosstraat

| 13. | via Bosstraat naar Graafsebaan |
| --- | --- |

13.

via Bosstraat naar Graafsebaan

| 14. | via Graafsebaan naar Rijksweg |
| --- | --- |

14.

via Graafsebaan naar Rijksweg

| 15. | via Rijksweg naar Postiljonstraat |
| --- | --- |

15.

via Rijksweg naar Postiljonstraat

| 16. | via Postiljonstraat naar Hoevestraat |
| --- | --- |

16.

via Postiljonstraat naar Hoevestraat

| 17. | via Hoevestraat naar Rogstraat |
| --- | --- |

17.

via Hoevestraat naar Rogstraat

| 18. | via Rogstraat naar Udensedreef |
| --- | --- |

18.

via Rogstraat naar Udensedreef

| 19. | via Udensedreef naar Dokter Langendijklaan |
| --- | --- |

19.

via Udensedreef naar Dokter Langendijklaan

| 20. | via Dokter Langendijklaan naar Zeelandsedreef |
| --- | --- |

20.

via Dokter Langendijklaan naar Zeelandsedreef

| 21. | via Zeelandsedreef naar Duifhuisstraat |
| --- | --- |

21.

via Zeelandsedreef naar Duifhuisstraat

| 22. | via Duifhuisstraat naar Heihorst |
| --- | --- |

22.

via Duifhuisstraat naar Heihorst

| 23. | via Heihorst naar Kreitsberg |
| --- | --- |

23.

via Heihorst naar Kreitsberg

| 24. | via Kreitsberg naar Reekseweg |
| --- | --- |

24.

via Kreitsberg naar Reekseweg

| 25. | via Reekseweg naar Heihorst |
| --- | --- |

25.

via Reekseweg naar Heihorst

| 26. | via Heihorst naar Langenboomseweg |
| --- | --- |

26.

via Heihorst naar Langenboomseweg

| 27. | via Langenboomseweg naar Peelweg |
| --- | --- |

27.

via Langenboomseweg naar Peelweg

| 28. | via Peelweg naar Middenpeelweg |
| --- | --- |

28.

via Peelweg naar Middenpeelweg

| 29. | via Middenpeelweg naar Oudedijk |
| --- | --- |

29.

via Middenpeelweg naar Oudedijk

| 30. | via Oudedijk naar Staartjespeelweg |
| --- | --- |

30.

via Oudedijk naar Staartjespeelweg

| 31. | via Staartjespeelweg naar Daandelendennen |
| --- | --- |

31.

via Staartjespeelweg naar Daandelendennen

| 32. | via Daandelendennen naar Wanroijseweg |
| --- | --- |

32.

via Daandelendennen naar Wanroijseweg

| 33. | via Wanroijseweg naar Voskuilenweg |
| --- | --- |

33.

via Wanroijseweg naar Voskuilenweg

| 34. | via Voskuilenweg naar Telefoonstraat |
| --- | --- |

34.

via Voskuilenweg naar Telefoonstraat

| 35. | via Telefoonstraat naar Statenweg |
| --- | --- |

35.

via Telefoonstraat naar Statenweg

| 36. | via Statenweg naar Gagelstraat |
| --- | --- |

36.

via Statenweg naar Gagelstraat

| 37. | via Gagelstraat naar Hoekstraat |
| --- | --- |

37.

via Gagelstraat naar Hoekstraat

| 38. | via Hoekstraat naar Dennenmark |
| --- | --- |

38.

via Hoekstraat naar Dennenmark

| 39. | via Dennenmark naar de Bunders |
| --- | --- |

39.

via Dennenmark naar de Bunders

| 40. | via de Bunders naar Kluisstraat |
| --- | --- |

40.

via de Bunders naar Kluisstraat

| 41. | via Kluisstraat naar Daniël de Brouwerstraat |
| --- | --- |

41.

via Kluisstraat naar Daniël de Brouwerstraat

| 42. | via Daniël de Brouwerstraat naar Pater Petrusstraat |
| --- | --- |

42.

via Daniël de Brouwerstraat naar Pater Petrusstraat

| 43. | via Pater Petrusstraat naar Strijbosscheweg |
| --- | --- |

43.

via Pater Petrusstraat naar Strijbosscheweg

| 44. | via Strijbosscheweg naar Boslaan |
| --- | --- |

44.

via Strijbosscheweg naar Boslaan

| 45. | via Boslaan naar Verreheide |
| --- | --- |

45.

via Boslaan naar Verreheide

| 46. | via Verreheide naar Boekelseweg |
| --- | --- |

46.

via Verreheide naar Boekelseweg

| 47. | via Boekelseweg naar Deel |
| --- | --- |

47.

via Boekelseweg naar Deel

| 48. | via Deel naar Kopperegang |
| --- | --- |

48.

via Deel naar Kopperegang

| 49. | via Kopperegang naar Bloemerdgang |
| --- | --- |

49.

via Kopperegang naar Bloemerdgang

| 50. | via Bloemerdgang naar de Bloemerd |
| --- | --- |

50.

via Bloemerdgang naar de Bloemerd

| 51. | via de Bloemerd naar de Haag |
| --- | --- |

51.

via de Bloemerd naar de Haag

| 52. | via de Haag naar Wijnboomlaan |
| --- | --- |

52.

via de Haag naar Wijnboomlaan

| 53. | via Wijnboomlaan naar Walgraafseweg |
| --- | --- |

53.

via Wijnboomlaan naar Walgraafseweg

| 54. | via Walgraafseweg naar Vonderweg-Oost |
| --- | --- |

54.

via Walgraafseweg naar Vonderweg-Oost

| 55. | via Vonderweg-Oost naar Leekbeemdweg |
| --- | --- |

55.

via Vonderweg-Oost naar Leekbeemdweg

| 56. | via Leekbeemdweg naar Middenweg |
| --- | --- |

56.

via Leekbeemdweg naar Middenweg

| 57. | via Middenweg naar Bosscheweg |
| --- | --- |

57.

via Middenweg naar Bosscheweg

| 58. | via Bosscheweg naar Kapelstraat |
| --- | --- |

58.

via Bosscheweg naar Kapelstraat

| 59. | via Kapelstraat naar Pater de Leeuwstraat |
| --- | --- |

59.

via Kapelstraat naar Pater de Leeuwstraat

| 60. | via Pater de Leeuwstraat naar de Hei |
| --- | --- |

60.

via Pater de Leeuwstraat naar de Hei

| 61. | via de Hei naar Mortelven |
| --- | --- |

61.

via de Hei naar Mortelven

| 62. | via Mortelven naar Rooijseweg |
| --- | --- |

62.

via Mortelven naar Rooijseweg

| 63. | via Rooijseweg naar Lieshoutseweg |
| --- | --- |

63.

via Rooijseweg naar Lieshoutseweg

| 64. | via Lieshoutseweg naar Oude-Lieshoutsedijk |
| --- | --- |

64.

via Lieshoutseweg naar Oude-Lieshoutsedijk

| 65. | via Oude-Lieshoutsedijk naar Lieshoutsedijk |
| --- | --- |

65.

via Oude-Lieshoutsedijk naar Lieshoutsedijk

| 66. | via Lieshoutsedijk naar Everse Akkerpad |
| --- | --- |

66.

via Lieshoutsedijk naar Everse Akkerpad

| 67. | via Everse Akkerpad naar Achterstesteeg |
| --- | --- |

67.

via Everse Akkerpad naar Achterstesteeg

| 68. | via Achterstesteeg naar Eversestraat |
| --- | --- |

68.

via Achterstesteeg naar Eversestraat

| 69. | via Eversestraat naar Noordelijke Randweg |
| --- | --- |

69.

via Eversestraat naar Noordelijke Randweg

| 70. | via Noordelijke Randweg naar Kampenweg |
| --- | --- |

70.

via Noordelijke Randweg naar Kampenweg

| 71. | via Kampenweg naar Kleine Heisteeg |
| --- | --- |

71.

via Kampenweg naar Kleine Heisteeg

| 72. | via Kleine Heisteeg naar Sterrebos |
| --- | --- |

72.

via Kleine Heisteeg naar Sterrebos

| 73. | via Sterrebos naar de Leijerweg |
| --- | --- |

73.

via Sterrebos naar de Leijerweg

| 74. | via de Leijerweg naar Schijndelseweg |
| --- | --- |

74.

via de Leijerweg naar Schijndelseweg

| 75. | via Schijndelseweg naar Rooiseweg |
| --- | --- |

75.

via Schijndelseweg naar Rooiseweg

| 76. | via Rooiseweg naar Europalaan |
| --- | --- |

76.

via Rooiseweg naar Europalaan

| 77. | via Europalaan naar Sterrenlaan |
| --- | --- |

77.

via Europalaan naar Sterrenlaan

| 78. | via Sterrenlaan naar Betelgeuze |
| --- | --- |

78.

via Sterrenlaan naar Betelgeuze

| 79. | via Betelgeuze naar Poolster |
| --- | --- |

79.

via Betelgeuze naar Poolster

| 80. | via Poolster naar Bernhardstraat |
| --- | --- |

80.

via Poolster naar Bernhardstraat

| 81. | via Bernhardstraat naar Hoevenbraaksestraat |
| --- | --- |

81.

via Bernhardstraat naar Hoevenbraaksestraat

| 82. | via Hoevenbraaksestraat naar van Berghenstraat |
| --- | --- |

82.

via Hoevenbraaksestraat naar van Berghenstraat

| 83. | via van Berghenstraat naar Kerkendijk |
| --- | --- |

83.

via van Berghenstraat naar Kerkendijk

| 84. | via Kerkendijk naar Smaldonkstraat |
| --- | --- |

84.

via Kerkendijk naar Smaldonkstraat

| 85. | via Smaldonkstraat naar Structuurweg |
| --- | --- |

85.

via Smaldonkstraat naar Structuurweg

| 86. | via Structuurweg naar Steeg |
| --- | --- |

86.

via Structuurweg naar Steeg

| 87. | via Steeg naar Heuvelstraat |
| --- | --- |

87.

via Steeg naar Heuvelstraat

| 88. | via Heuvelstraat naar Houterdsedijk |
| --- | --- |

88.

via Heuvelstraat naar Houterdsedijk

| 89. | via Houterdsedijk naar Vossenberg |
| --- | --- |

89.

via Houterdsedijk naar Vossenberg

| 90. | via Vossenberg naar Leemweg |
| --- | --- |

90.

via Vossenberg naar Leemweg

| 91. | via Leemweg naar Dungensesteeg |
| --- | --- |

91.

via Leemweg naar Dungensesteeg

| 92. | via Dungensesteeg naar Schutskooi |
| --- | --- |

92.

via Dungensesteeg naar Schutskooi

| 93. | via Schutskooi naar Kanaaldijk-Zuid |
| --- | --- |

93.

via Schutskooi naar Kanaaldijk-Zuid

| 94. | via Kanaaldijk-Zuid naar Kanaaldijk Zuid |
| --- | --- |

94.

via Kanaaldijk-Zuid naar Kanaaldijk Zuid

| 95. | via Kanaaldijk Zuid naar Molendijk |
| --- | --- |

95.

via Kanaaldijk Zuid naar Molendijk

| 96. | via Molendijk naar Zuid-Willemsvaart |
| --- | --- |

96.

via Molendijk naar Zuid-Willemsvaart

| 97. | via Zuid-Willemsvaart naar Kapelstraat |
| --- | --- |

97.

via Zuid-Willemsvaart naar Kapelstraat

| 98. | via Kapelstraat naar Brugstraat |
| --- | --- |

98.

via Kapelstraat naar Brugstraat

| 99. | via Brugstraat naar Pastoor Verlindenstraat |
| --- | --- |

99.

via Brugstraat naar Pastoor Verlindenstraat

| 100. | via Pastoor Verlindenstraat naar Haffertsestraat |
| --- | --- |

100.

via Pastoor Verlindenstraat naar Haffertsestraat

| 101. | via Haffertsestraat naar Gouverneursweg |
| --- | --- |

101.

via Haffertsestraat naar Gouverneursweg

| 102. | via Gouverneursweg naar Kersouwelaan |
| --- | --- |

102.

via Gouverneursweg naar Kersouwelaan

| 103. | via Kersouwelaan naar Fietspad |
| --- | --- |

103.

via Kersouwelaan naar Fietspad

| 104. | via Fietspad volgend naar Kaathovensedijk |
| --- | --- |

104.

via Fietspad volgend naar Kaathovensedijk

| 105. | via Kaathovensedijk naar Kaathoven |
| --- | --- |

105.

via Kaathovensedijk naar Kaathoven

| 106. | via Kaathoven naar Brugstraat |
| --- | --- |

106.

via Kaathoven naar Brugstraat

| 107. | via Brugstraat naar Lindenlaan |
| --- | --- |

107.

via Brugstraat naar Lindenlaan

| 108. | via Lindenlaan naar Vinkelsestraat |
| --- | --- |

108.

via Lindenlaan naar Vinkelsestraat

11.12.2022

Those parts of the municipality Nederweert contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 5.59, lat 51.65

3.12.2022 -11.12.2022

Municipality Woerden province Utrecht

NL-HPAI(NON-P)-2022-00736

Bewakingszone (10 kilometer) Zegveld

| 1. | via A.H. Kooistrastraat naar Dorpsstraat |
| --- | --- |

1.

via A.H. Kooistrastraat naar Dorpsstraat

| 2. | via Dorpsstraat naar Uiterbuurtweg |
| --- | --- |

2.

via Dorpsstraat naar Uiterbuurtweg

| 3. | via Uiterbuurtweg naar Blokland |
| --- | --- |

3.

via Uiterbuurtweg naar Blokland

| 4. | via Blokland naar Achterweg |
| --- | --- |

4.

via Blokland naar Achterweg

| 5. | via Achterweg naar Oude Spoorbaan |
| --- | --- |

5.

via Achterweg naar Oude Spoorbaan

| 6. | via Oude Spoorbaan naar Ringdijk 2e bedijking |
| --- | --- |

6.

via Oude Spoorbaan naar Ringdijk 2e bedijking

| 7. | via Ringdijk 2e bedijking naar A.C. Verhoefweg |
| --- | --- |

7.

via Ringdijk 2e bedijking naar A.C. Verhoefweg

| 8. | via A.C. Verhoefweg naar Tweede Zijweg |
| --- | --- |

8.

via A.C. Verhoefweg naar Tweede Zijweg

| 9. | via Tweede Zijweg naar Dukaton |
| --- | --- |

9.

via Tweede Zijweg naar Dukaton

| 10. | via Dukaton naar Hofland |
| --- | --- |

10.

via Dukaton naar Hofland

| 11. | via Hofland naar Mijdrechtse Zuwe |
| --- | --- |

11.

via Hofland naar Mijdrechtse Zuwe

| 12. | via Mijdrechtse Zuwe naar Provincialeweg |
| --- | --- |

12.

via Mijdrechtse Zuwe naar Provincialeweg

| 13. | via Provincialeweg naar Veenweg |
| --- | --- |

13.

via Provincialeweg naar Veenweg

| 14. | via Veenweg naar Vermogenweg |
| --- | --- |

14.

via Veenweg naar Vermogenweg

| 15. | via Vermogenweg naar Veenweg |
| --- | --- |

15.

via Vermogenweg naar Veenweg

| 16. | via Veenweg naar Mijdrechtse Dwarsweg |
| --- | --- |

16.

via Veenweg naar Mijdrechtse Dwarsweg

| 17. | via Mijdrechtse Dwarsweg naar ir. Enschedéweg |
| --- | --- |

17.

via Mijdrechtse Dwarsweg naar ir. Enschedéweg

| 18. | via ir. Enschedéweg naar Oudhuijzerweg |
| --- | --- |

18.

via ir. Enschedéweg naar Oudhuijzerweg

| 19. | via Oudhuijzerweg naar Korenmolenweg |
| --- | --- |

19.

via Oudhuijzerweg naar Korenmolenweg

| 20. | via Korenmolenweg naar Portengen |
| --- | --- |

20.

via Korenmolenweg naar Portengen

| 21. | via Portengen naar Gieltjesdorp |
| --- | --- |

21.

via Portengen naar Gieltjesdorp

| 22. | via Gieltjesdorp naar Rijndijk |
| --- | --- |

22.

via Gieltjesdorp naar Rijndijk

| 23. | via Rijndijk naar Breudijk |
| --- | --- |

23.

via Rijndijk naar Breudijk

| 24. | via Breudijk naar Breudijktunnel |
| --- | --- |

24.

via Breudijk naar Breudijktunnel

| 25. | via Breudijktunnel naar Breudijk |
| --- | --- |

25.

via Breudijktunnel naar Breudijk

| 26. | via Breudijk naar Appellaan |
| --- | --- |

26.

via Breudijk naar Appellaan

| 27. | via Appellaan naar de Joncheerelaan |
| --- | --- |

27.

via Appellaan naar de Joncheerelaan

| 28. | via de Joncheerelaan naar Dorpsstraat |
| --- | --- |

28.

via de Joncheerelaan naar Dorpsstraat

| 29. | via Dorpsstraat naar Acacialaan |
| --- | --- |

29.

via Dorpsstraat naar Acacialaan

| 30. | via Acacialaan naar Raadhuislaan |
| --- | --- |

30.

via Acacialaan naar Raadhuislaan

| 31. | via Raadhuislaan naar Reijerscopse Overgang |
| --- | --- |

31.

via Raadhuislaan naar Reijerscopse Overgang

| 32. | via Reijerscopse Overgang naar Reijerscop |
| --- | --- |

32.

via Reijerscopse Overgang naar Reijerscop

| 33. | via Reijerscop naar Blindeweg |
| --- | --- |

33.

via Reijerscop naar Blindeweg

| 34. | via Blindeweg naar Mastwijkerdijk |
| --- | --- |

34.

via Blindeweg naar Mastwijkerdijk

| 35. | via Mastwijkerdijk naar Lindeboomsweg |
| --- | --- |

35.

via Mastwijkerdijk naar Lindeboomsweg

| 36. | via Lindeboomsweg naar IJsselveld |
| --- | --- |

36.

via Lindeboomsweg naar IJsselveld

| 37. | via IJsselveld naar Waardsedijk |
| --- | --- |

37.

via IJsselveld naar Waardsedijk

| 38. | via Waardsedijk naar Laan van Snelrewaard |
| --- | --- |

38.

via Waardsedijk naar Laan van Snelrewaard

| 39. | via Laan van Snelrewaard naar Zuid-Linschoterkade |
| --- | --- |

39.

via Laan van Snelrewaard naar Zuid-Linschoterkade

| 40. | via Zuid-Linschoterkade naar Linschoterpoort |
| --- | --- |

40.

via Zuid-Linschoterkade naar Linschoterpoort

| 41. | via Linschoterpoort naar Vinkenbuurt |
| --- | --- |

41.

via Linschoterpoort naar Vinkenbuurt

| 42. | via Vinkenbuurt naar Biezenpoortstraat |
| --- | --- |

42.

via Vinkenbuurt naar Biezenpoortstraat

| 43. | via Biezenpoortstraat naar Oude Singel |
| --- | --- |

43.

via Biezenpoortstraat naar Oude Singel

| 44. | via Oude Singel naar Johan J. Vierbergenweg |
| --- | --- |

44.

via Oude Singel naar Johan J. Vierbergenweg

| 45. | via Johan J. Vierbergenweg naar Tappersheul |
| --- | --- |

45.

via Johan J. Vierbergenweg naar Tappersheul

| 46. | via Tappersheul naar Ruige Weide |
| --- | --- |

46.

via Tappersheul naar Ruige Weide

| 47. | via Ruige Weide naar Poppelendam |
| --- | --- |

47.

via Ruige Weide naar Poppelendam

| 48. | via Poppelendam naar Lange Weidsche Boezem |
| --- | --- |

48.

via Poppelendam naar Lange Weidsche Boezem

| 49. | via Lange Weidsche Boezem naar Hogebrug |
| --- | --- |

49.

via Lange Weidsche Boezem naar Hogebrug

| 50. | via Hogebrug naar Hoogeind |
| --- | --- |

50.

via Hogebrug naar Hoogeind

| 51. | via Hoogeind naar Wierickepad |
| --- | --- |

51.

via Hoogeind naar Wierickepad

| 52. | via Wierickepad naar Oukoopsedijk |
| --- | --- |

52.

via Wierickepad naar Oukoopsedijk

| 53. | via Oukoopsedijk naar Nieuwenbroeksedijk |
| --- | --- |

53.

via Oukoopsedijk naar Nieuwenbroeksedijk

| 54. | via Nieuwenbroeksedijk naar Lecksdijk |
| --- | --- |

54.

via Nieuwenbroeksedijk naar Lecksdijk

| 55. | via Lecksdijk naar Bosmankade |
| --- | --- |

55.

via Lecksdijk naar Bosmankade

| 56. | via Bosmankade naar Zoetendijk |
| --- | --- |

56.

via Bosmankade naar Zoetendijk

| 57. | via Zoetendijk naar Oudeweg |
| --- | --- |

57.

via Zoetendijk naar Oudeweg

| 58. | via Oudeweg naar Raadhuisweg |
| --- | --- |

58.

via Oudeweg naar Raadhuisweg

| 59. | via Raadhuisweg naar Goudsestraatweg |
| --- | --- |

59.

via Raadhuisweg naar Goudsestraatweg

| 60. | via Goudsestraatweg naar Reeuwijkse Randweg |
| --- | --- |

60.

via Goudsestraatweg naar Reeuwijkse Randweg

| 61. | via Reeuwijkse Randweg naar Oud Reeuwijkseweg |
| --- | --- |

61.

via Reeuwijkse Randweg naar Oud Reeuwijkseweg

| 62. | via Oud Reeuwijkseweg naar Schinkeldijk |
| --- | --- |

62.

via Oud Reeuwijkseweg naar Schinkeldijk

| 63. | via Schinkeldijk naar Zijdeweg |
| --- | --- |

63.

via Schinkeldijk naar Zijdeweg

| 64. | via Zijdeweg naar Warmoeskade |
| --- | --- |

64.

via Zijdeweg naar Warmoeskade

| 65. | via Warmoeskade naar Wonnepad |
| --- | --- |

65.

via Warmoeskade naar Wonnepad

| 66. | via Wonnepad naar Wijkdijk |
| --- | --- |

66.

via Wonnepad naar Wijkdijk

| 67. | via Wijkdijk naar Voshol |
| --- | --- |

67.

via Wijkdijk naar Voshol

| 68. | via Voshol naar Insteek |
| --- | --- |

68.

via Voshol naar Insteek

| 69. | via Insteek naar Goudse Rijweg |
| --- | --- |

69.

via Insteek naar Goudse Rijweg

| 70. | via Goudse Rijweg naar Goudse Rijpad |
| --- | --- |

70.

via Goudse Rijweg naar Goudse Rijpad

| 71. | via Goudse Rijpad naar Spoorbaan |
| --- | --- |

71.

via Goudse Rijpad naar Spoorbaan

| 72. | via Spoorbaan naar Boskoopseweg |
| --- | --- |

72.

via Spoorbaan naar Boskoopseweg

| 73. | via Boskoopseweg naar Oostkanaalweg |
| --- | --- |

73.

via Boskoopseweg naar Oostkanaalweg

| 74. | via Oostkanaalweg naar Steekterbrug |
| --- | --- |

74.

via Oostkanaalweg naar Steekterbrug

| 75. | via Steekterbrug naar Oostkanaalweg |
| --- | --- |

75.

via Steekterbrug naar Oostkanaalweg

| 76. | via Oostkanaalweg naar Zegerbaan |
| --- | --- |

76.

via Oostkanaalweg naar Zegerbaan

| 77. | via Zegerbaan naar Veldhuizenpad |
| --- | --- |

77.

via Zegerbaan naar Veldhuizenpad

| 78. | via Veldhuizenpad naar Windepad |
| --- | --- |

78.

via Veldhuizenpad naar Windepad

| 79. | via Windepad naar Ringdijk |
| --- | --- |

79.

via Windepad naar Ringdijk

| 80. | via Ringdijk naar Aardamseweg |
| --- | --- |

80.

via Ringdijk naar Aardamseweg

| 81. | via Aardamseweg naar Ringdijk |
| --- | --- |

81.

via Aardamseweg naar Ringdijk

| 82. | via Ringdijk naar Hertog van Beijerenstraat |
| --- | --- |

82.

via Ringdijk naar Hertog van Beijerenstraat

| 83. | via Hertog van Beijerenstraat naar Westkanaalweg |
| --- | --- |

83.

via Hertog van Beijerenstraat naar Westkanaalweg

| 84. | via Westkanaalweg naar Oude Nieuwveenseweg |
| --- | --- |

84.

via Westkanaalweg naar Oude Nieuwveenseweg

| 85. | via Oude Nieuwveenseweg naar A.H. Kooistrastraat |
| --- | --- |

85.

via Oude Nieuwveenseweg naar A.H. Kooistrastraat

11.12.2022

Those parts of the municipality Woerden contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4.84, lat 52.13

3.12.2022 -11.12.2022

Municipality Venray province Limburg

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00086

| 1. | via Kuulenweg naar Vredepeelweg |
| --- | --- |

1.

via Kuulenweg naar Vredepeelweg

| 2. | via Vredepeelweg naar Crooijmansweg |
| --- | --- |

2.

via Vredepeelweg naar Crooijmansweg

| 3. | via Crooijmansweg naar Rieterdreef |
| --- | --- |

3.

via Crooijmansweg naar Rieterdreef

| 4. | via Rieterdreef naar Oplosedijk |
| --- | --- |

4.

via Rieterdreef naar Oplosedijk

| 5. | via Oplosedijk naar Groeningsedijk |
| --- | --- |

5.

via Oplosedijk naar Groeningsedijk

| 6. | via Groeningsedijk naar Kievelaarsedijk |
| --- | --- |

6.

via Groeningsedijk naar Kievelaarsedijk

| 7. | via Kievelaarsedijk naar Mullemsedijk |
| --- | --- |

7.

via Kievelaarsedijk naar Mullemsedijk

| 8. | via Mullemsedijk naar Luinbeekweg |
| --- | --- |

8.

via Mullemsedijk naar Luinbeekweg

| 9. | via Luinbeekweg naar Sint Cornelisstraat |
| --- | --- |

9.

via Luinbeekweg naar Sint Cornelisstraat

| 10. | via Sint Cornelisstraat naar Veerweg |
| --- | --- |

10.

via Sint Cornelisstraat naar Veerweg

| 11. | via Veerweg naar Maasstraat |
| --- | --- |

11.

via Veerweg naar Maasstraat

| 12. | via Maasstraat naar Pierre ii |
| --- | --- |

12.

via Maasstraat naar Pierre ii

| 13. | via Pierre ii naar Veerweg |
| --- | --- |

13.

via Pierre ii naar Veerweg

| 14. | via Veerweg naar Hengeland |
| --- | --- |

14.

via Veerweg naar Hengeland

| 15. | via Hengeland naar Gening |
| --- | --- |

15.

via Hengeland naar Gening

| 16. | via Gening naar Heukelom |
| --- | --- |

16.

via Gening naar Heukelom

| 17. | via Heukelom naar Berkenkamp |
| --- | --- |

17.

via Heukelom naar Berkenkamp

| 18. | via Berkenkamp naar Spitsbrug |
| --- | --- |

18.

via Berkenkamp naar Spitsbrug

| 19. | via Spitsbrug naar Bleijenbeeksebosweg |
| --- | --- |

19.

via Spitsbrug naar Bleijenbeeksebosweg

| 20. | via Bleijenbeeksebosweg naar Siebengewaldseweg |
| --- | --- |

20.

via Bleijenbeeksebosweg naar Siebengewaldseweg

| 21. | via Siebengewaldseweg naar Gochsedijk |
| --- | --- |

21.

via Siebengewaldseweg naar Gochsedijk

| 22. | via Gochsedijk naar Baalsedijk |
| --- | --- |

22.

via Gochsedijk naar Baalsedijk

| 23. | via Baalsedijk naar Landgrens |
| --- | --- |

23.

via Baalsedijk naar Landgrens

| 24. | via Landgrens naar Twistedenerweg |
| --- | --- |

24.

via Landgrens naar Twistedenerweg

| 25. | via Twistedenerweg naar Heerenvenweg |
| --- | --- |

25.

via Twistedenerweg naar Heerenvenweg

| 26. | via Heerenvenweg naar Moerasweg |
| --- | --- |

26.

via Heerenvenweg naar Moerasweg

| 27. | via Moerasweg naar Walbeckerweg |
| --- | --- |

27.

via Moerasweg naar Walbeckerweg

| 28. | via Walbeckerweg naar Hamert |
| --- | --- |

28.

via Walbeckerweg naar Hamert

| 29. | via Hamert naar Provincialeweg |
| --- | --- |

29.

via Hamert naar Provincialeweg

| 30. | via Provincialeweg naar Maasstraat |
| --- | --- |

30.

via Provincialeweg naar Maasstraat

| 31. | via Maasstraat naar Kruisweg |
| --- | --- |

31.

via Maasstraat naar Kruisweg

| 32. | via Kruisweg naar Veerdienst |
| --- | --- |

32.

via Kruisweg naar Veerdienst

| 33. | via Veerdienst naar Veerweg |
| --- | --- |

33.

via Veerdienst naar Veerweg

| 34. | via Veerweg naar Lottumseweg |
| --- | --- |

34.

via Veerweg naar Lottumseweg

| 35. | via Lottumseweg naar Looweg |
| --- | --- |

35.

via Lottumseweg naar Looweg

| 36. | via Looweg naar Bronskuilweg |
| --- | --- |

36.

via Looweg naar Bronskuilweg

| 37. | via Bronskuilweg naar Hilkensbergweg |
| --- | --- |

37.

via Bronskuilweg naar Hilkensbergweg

| 38. | via Hilkensbergweg naar Hoogveldweg |
| --- | --- |

38.

via Hilkensbergweg naar Hoogveldweg

| 39. | via Hoogveldweg naar Vonkelseweg |
| --- | --- |

39.

via Hoogveldweg naar Vonkelseweg

| 40. | via Vonkelseweg naar Hombergerweg |
| --- | --- |

40.

via Vonkelseweg naar Hombergerweg

| 41. | via Hombergerweg naar Horsterdijk |
| --- | --- |

41.

via Hombergerweg naar Horsterdijk

| 42. | via Horsterdijk naar Hoogheide |
| --- | --- |

42.

via Horsterdijk naar Hoogheide

| 43. | via Hoogheide naar Losbaan |
| --- | --- |

43.

via Hoogheide naar Losbaan

| 44. | via Losbaan naar Laagheide |
| --- | --- |

44.

via Losbaan naar Laagheide

| 45. | via Laagheide naar Witveldweg |
| --- | --- |

45.

via Laagheide naar Witveldweg

| 46. | via Witveldweg naar Venloseweg |
| --- | --- |

46.

via Witveldweg naar Venloseweg

| 47. | via Venloseweg naar Hamweg |
| --- | --- |

47.

via Venloseweg naar Hamweg

| 48. | via Hamweg naar Reulsweg |
| --- | --- |

48.

via Hamweg naar Reulsweg

| 49. | via Reulsweg naar Vrouwboomweg |
| --- | --- |

49.

via Reulsweg naar Vrouwboomweg

| 50. | via Vrouwboomweg naar St. Annaweg |
| --- | --- |

50.

via Vrouwboomweg naar St. Annaweg

| 51. | via St. Annaweg naar Expeditiestraat |
| --- | --- |

51.

via St. Annaweg naar Expeditiestraat

| 52. | via Expeditiestraat naar Energiestraat |
| --- | --- |

52.

via Expeditiestraat naar Energiestraat

| 53. | via Energiestraat naar Nijverheidsstraat |
| --- | --- |

53.

via Energiestraat naar Nijverheidsstraat

| 54. | via Nijverheidsstraat naar Industriestraat |
| --- | --- |

54.

via Nijverheidsstraat naar Industriestraat

| 55. | via Industriestraat naar Westsingel |
| --- | --- |

55.

via Industriestraat naar Westsingel

| 56. | via Westsingel naar Bemmelstraat |
| --- | --- |

56.

via Westsingel naar Bemmelstraat

| 57. | via Bemmelstraat naar Kogelstraat |
| --- | --- |

57.

via Bemmelstraat naar Kogelstraat

| 58. | via Kogelstraat naar Hillenweg |
| --- | --- |

58.

via Kogelstraat naar Hillenweg

| 59. | via Hillenweg naar Speulhofsbaan |
| --- | --- |

59.

via Hillenweg naar Speulhofsbaan

| 60. | via Speulhofsbaan naar Campagneweg |
| --- | --- |

60.

via Speulhofsbaan naar Campagneweg

| 61. | via Campagneweg naar Americaanseweg |
| --- | --- |

61.

via Campagneweg naar Americaanseweg

| 62. | via Americaanseweg naar Kannegietweg |
| --- | --- |

62.

via Americaanseweg naar Kannegietweg

| 63. | via Kannegietweg naar Hofweg |
| --- | --- |

63.

via Kannegietweg naar Hofweg

| 64. | via Hofweg naar Nusseleinstraat |
| --- | --- |

64.

via Hofweg naar Nusseleinstraat

| 65. | via Nusseleinstraat naar Kabroekstraat |
| --- | --- |

65.

via Nusseleinstraat naar Kabroekstraat

| 66. | via Kabroekstraat naar Gerard Smuldersstraat |
| --- | --- |

66.

via Kabroekstraat naar Gerard Smuldersstraat

| 67. | via Gerard Smuldersstraat naar Lorbaan |
| --- | --- |

67.

via Gerard Smuldersstraat naar Lorbaan

| 68. | via Lorbaan naar Laagheideweg |
| --- | --- |

68.

via Lorbaan naar Laagheideweg

| 69. | via Laagheideweg naar Midden Peelweg |
| --- | --- |

69.

via Laagheideweg naar Midden Peelweg

| 70. | via Midden Peelweg naar Puttenweg |
| --- | --- |

70.

via Midden Peelweg naar Puttenweg

| 71. | via Puttenweg naar Lovinckplein |
| --- | --- |

71.

via Puttenweg naar Lovinckplein

| 72. | via Lovinckplein naar Jan Poelsweg |
| --- | --- |

72.

via Lovinckplein naar Jan Poelsweg

| 73. | via Jan Poelsweg naar Peelweg |
| --- | --- |

73.

via Jan Poelsweg naar Peelweg

| 74. | via Peelweg naar Beekweg |
| --- | --- |

74.

via Peelweg naar Beekweg

| 75. | via Beekweg naar Kuulenweg |
| --- | --- |

75.

via Beekweg naar Kuulenweg

22.12.2022

Those parts of the municipality Venray contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 6.05, lat 51.54

14.12.2022 - 22.12.2022

Municipality Krimpenerwaard province Zuidholland

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00087

| 1. | Vanaf de kruising Cornelis Gerardus Roosweg/Kerkweg, Kerkweg volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan Burgermeester Neetstraat. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Vanaf de kruising Cornelis Gerardus Roosweg/Kerkweg, Kerkweg volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan Burgermeester Neetstraat.

| 2. | Burgermeester neetstraat volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan Hollandsche IJssel. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Burgermeester neetstraat volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan Hollandsche IJssel.

| 3. | Hollandsche IJssel volgen in oostelijke richting tot aan Gemaal Abraham Kroes. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Hollandsche IJssel volgen in oostelijke richting tot aan Gemaal Abraham Kroes.

| 4. | Gemaal Abraham kroes via Water volgen tot aan Spoorlijn Utrecht-Rotterdam. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Gemaal Abraham kroes via Water volgen tot aan Spoorlijn Utrecht-Rotterdam.

| 5. | Spoorlijn volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Goudse Poort. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Spoorlijn volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Goudse Poort.

| 6. | Goudse Poort volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan A12. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Goudse Poort volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan A12.

| 7. | A12 volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Tuurluur. |
| --- | --- |

7.

A12 volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Tuurluur.

| 8. | Tuurluur volgen in zuidelijke richting overgaand in Johan.J.Vierbergenweg tot aan Lijnbaan. |
| --- | --- |

8.

Tuurluur volgen in zuidelijke richting overgaand in Johan.J.Vierbergenweg tot aan Lijnbaan.

| 9. | Lijnbaan volgen in oostelijke richting tot aan Kabelslag. |
| --- | --- |

9.

Lijnbaan volgen in oostelijke richting tot aan Kabelslag.

| 10. | Kabelslag volgen in zuidelijke richting tot aan Lange Linschoten. |
| --- | --- |

10.

Kabelslag volgen in zuidelijke richting tot aan Lange Linschoten.

| 11. | Lange Linschoten volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Laan van Snelrewaard. |
| --- | --- |

11.

Lange Linschoten volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Laan van Snelrewaard.

| 12. | Laan van Snelrewaard volgen in zuidelijke richting tot aan Hollandsche IJssel. |
| --- | --- |

12.

Laan van Snelrewaard volgen in zuidelijke richting tot aan Hollandsche IJssel.

| 13. | Hollandsche IJssel volgen in oostelijke richting tot aan N204. |
| --- | --- |

13.

Hollandsche IJssel volgen in oostelijke richting tot aan N204.

| 14. | N204 volgen in zuidelijke richting overgaand in N210 tot aan Rolafweg Zuid. |
| --- | --- |

14.

N204 volgen in zuidelijke richting overgaand in N210 tot aan Rolafweg Zuid.

| 15. | Rolafweg Zuid volgen in zuidelijke richting de Lekdijk overstekend tot aan Lekdijk. |
| --- | --- |

15.

Rolafweg Zuid volgen in zuidelijke richting de Lekdijk overstekend tot aan Lekdijk.

| 16. | Lekdijk volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Lagewaard. |
| --- | --- |

16.

Lekdijk volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Lagewaard.

| 17. | Lagewaard volgen in zuidelijke richting tot aan Tiendweg. |
| --- | --- |

17.

Lagewaard volgen in zuidelijke richting tot aan Tiendweg.

| 18. | Tiendweg volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Kleine Vliet. |
| --- | --- |

18.

Tiendweg volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Kleine Vliet.

| 19. | Kleine Vliet volgen in zuidelijke richting overgaand in grens Zuid-Holland-Utrecht tot aan Tiendweg. |
| --- | --- |

19.

Kleine Vliet volgen in zuidelijke richting overgaand in grens Zuid-Holland-Utrecht tot aan Tiendweg.

| 20. | Tiendweg volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Gorissenweg. |
| --- | --- |

20.

Tiendweg volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Gorissenweg.

| 21. | Gorissenweg volgen in zuidelijke richting tot aan N214. |
| --- | --- |

21.

Gorissenweg volgen in zuidelijke richting tot aan N214.

| 22. | N214 volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Wervenkampweg. |
| --- | --- |

22.

N214 volgen in westelijke richting tot aan Wervenkampweg.

| 23. | Wervenkampweg volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan Graafstroom. |
| --- | --- |

23.

Wervenkampweg volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan Graafstroom.

| 24. | Graafstroom volgen westelijke richting tot aan N481. |
| --- | --- |

24.

Graafstroom volgen westelijke richting tot aan N481.

| 25. | N481 volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan Groot Achterwaterschap. |
| --- | --- |

25.

N481 volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan Groot Achterwaterschap.

| 26. | Groot Achterwaterschap volgen in westelijke richting overgaand in Nieuwe Waterschp de Lek overstekend tot aan Breekade. |
| --- | --- |

26.

Groot Achterwaterschap volgen in westelijke richting overgaand in Nieuwe Waterschp de Lek overstekend tot aan Breekade.

| 27. | Breekade volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan N210. |
| --- | --- |

27.

Breekade volgen in noordelijke richting tot aan N210.

| 28. | Cornelis Gerardus Roosweg volgen in oostelijke richting tot aan Kerkweg. |
| --- | --- |

28.

Cornelis Gerardus Roosweg volgen in oostelijke richting tot aan Kerkweg.

22.12.2022

Those parts of the municipality Krimpenerwaard contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 4.8, lat 51.97

14.12.2022 – 22.12.2022

Municipality Súdwest-Fryslân province Friesland

NL-HPAI(P)-2022-00088

| 1. | via Doniaburen naar Scharnebuursterweg |
| --- | --- |

1.

via Doniaburen naar Scharnebuursterweg

| 2. | via Scharnebuursterweg naar Buren |
| --- | --- |

2.

via Scharnebuursterweg naar Buren

| 3. | via Buren naar Aaltjemeerweg |
| --- | --- |

3.

via Buren naar Aaltjemeerweg

| 4. | via Aaltjemeerweg naar Trekweg |
| --- | --- |

4.

via Aaltjemeerweg naar Trekweg

| 5. | via Trekweg naar Horstweg |
| --- | --- |

5.

via Trekweg naar Horstweg

| 6. | via Horstweg naar Ysgumerweg |
| --- | --- |

6.

via Horstweg naar Ysgumerweg

| 7. | via Ysgumerweg naar Krabbedijk |
| --- | --- |

7.

via Ysgumerweg naar Krabbedijk

| 8. | via Krabbedijk naar Hemdijk |
| --- | --- |

8.

via Krabbedijk naar Hemdijk

| 9. | via Hemdijk naar Vitusdyk |
| --- | --- |

9.

via Hemdijk naar Vitusdyk

| 10. | via Vitusdyk naar de Kat |
| --- | --- |

10.

via Vitusdyk naar de Kat

| 11. | via de Kat naar Westerskatting |
| --- | --- |

11.

via de Kat naar Westerskatting

| 12. | via Westerskatting naar Stasjonsleane |
| --- | --- |

12.

via Westerskatting naar Stasjonsleane

| 13. | via Stasjonsleane naar Breksdyk |
| --- | --- |

13.

via Stasjonsleane naar Breksdyk

| 14. | via Breksdyk naar Hagenadyk |
| --- | --- |

14.

via Breksdyk naar Hagenadyk

| 15. | via Hagenadyk naar Rigedyk |
| --- | --- |

15.

via Hagenadyk naar Rigedyk

| 16. | via Rigedyk naar Lytshuzen |
| --- | --- |

16.

via Rigedyk naar Lytshuzen

| 17. | via Lytshuzen naar de Skatting |
| --- | --- |

17.

via Lytshuzen naar de Skatting

| 18. | via de Skatting naar Tollewei |
| --- | --- |

18.

via de Skatting naar Tollewei

| 19. | via Tollewei naar Molefinne |
| --- | --- |

19.

via Tollewei naar Molefinne

| 20. | via Molefinne naar de Draei |
| --- | --- |

20.

via Molefinne naar de Draei

| 21. | via de Draei naar Heeger Var |
| --- | --- |

21.

via de Draei naar Heeger Var

| 22. | via Heeger Var naar Graft |
| --- | --- |

22.

via Heeger Var naar Graft

| 23. | via Graft naar Vaargeul van de Graft naar het Johan Frisokanaal |
| --- | --- |

23.

via Graft naar Vaargeul van de Graft naar het Johan Frisokanaal

| 24. | via Vaargeul van de Graft naar het Johan Frisokanaal naar Vaargeul aanloop Woudsenderrakken |
| --- | --- |

24.

via Vaargeul van de Graft naar het Johan Frisokanaal naar Vaargeul aanloop Woudsenderrakken

| 25. | via Vaargeul aanloop Woudsenderrakken naar Woudsenderrakken |
| --- | --- |

25.

via Vaargeul aanloop Woudsenderrakken naar Woudsenderrakken

| 26. | via Woudsenderrakken naar Noorder-Ee |
| --- | --- |

26.

via Woudsenderrakken naar Noorder-Ee

| 27. | via Noorder-Ee naar de Dyk |
| --- | --- |

27.

via Noorder-Ee naar de Dyk

| 28. | via de Dyk naar op ‘e Romte |
| --- | --- |

28.

via de Dyk naar op ‘e Romte

| 29. | via op ‘e Romte naar Nr |
| --- | --- |

29.

via op ‘e Romte naar Nr

| 30. | via Nr naar Ee |
| --- | --- |

30.

via Nr naar Ee

| 31. | via Ee naar Slotermeer |
| --- | --- |

31.

via Ee naar Slotermeer

| 32. | via Slotermeer naar Slotergat |
| --- | --- |

32.

via Slotermeer naar Slotergat

| 33. | via Slotergat naar Oostelijke Stadsgracht |
| --- | --- |

33.

via Slotergat naar Oostelijke Stadsgracht

| 34. | via Oostelijke Stadsgracht naar Rûnwei |
| --- | --- |

34.

via Oostelijke Stadsgracht naar Rûnwei

| 35. | via Rûnwei naar Wijckelerweg |
| --- | --- |

35.

via Rûnwei naar Wijckelerweg

| 36. | via Wijckelerweg naar Jeen Hornstraweg |
| --- | --- |

36.

via Wijckelerweg naar Jeen Hornstraweg

| 37. | via Jeen Hornstraweg naar Heerenhoogweg |
| --- | --- |

37.

via Jeen Hornstraweg naar Heerenhoogweg

| 38. | via Heerenhoogweg naar de Vinkebuorren |
| --- | --- |

38.

via Heerenhoogweg naar de Vinkebuorren

| 39. | via de Vinkebuorren naar Jacobus Boomsmastraat |
| --- | --- |

39.

via de Vinkebuorren naar Jacobus Boomsmastraat

| 40. | via Jacobus Boomsmastraat naar Beuckenswijkstraat |
| --- | --- |

40.

via Jacobus Boomsmastraat naar Beuckenswijkstraat

| 41. | via Beuckenswijkstraat naar Lyklamawei |
| --- | --- |

41.

via Beuckenswijkstraat naar Lyklamawei

| 42. | via Lyklamawei naar Hoitebuorren |
| --- | --- |

42.

via Lyklamawei naar Hoitebuorren

| 43. | via Hoitebuorren naar Steek Door |
| --- | --- |

43.

via Hoitebuorren naar Steek Door

| 44. | via Steek Door naar landgrens |
| --- | --- |

44.

via Steek Door naar landgrens

| 45. | via landgrens naar Steek Door |
| --- | --- |

45.

via landgrens naar Steek Door

| 46. | via Steek Door naar Vrouwezand |
| --- | --- |

46.

via Steek Door naar Vrouwezand

| 47. | via Vrouwezand naar Vaarwater naar Stavoren |
| --- | --- |

47.

via Vrouwezand naar Vaarwater naar Stavoren

| 48. | via Vaarwater naar Stavoren naar Vaarwater over het Lacon |
| --- | --- |

48.

via Vaarwater naar Stavoren naar Vaarwater over het Lacon

| 49. | via Vaarwater over het Lacon naar Vaarwater langs de Friese kust |
| --- | --- |

49.

via Vaarwater over het Lacon naar Vaarwater langs de Friese kust

| 50. | via Vaarwater langs de Friese kust naar Steek Door |
| --- | --- |

50.

via Vaarwater langs de Friese kust naar Steek Door

| 51. | via Steek Door naar Zeedijk |
| --- | --- |

51.

via Steek Door naar Zeedijk

| 52. | via Zeedijk naar Doniaburen |
| --- | --- |

52.

via Zeedijk naar Doniaburen

23.12.2022

Those parts of the municipality Súdwest-Fryslân contained within a circle of a radius of 3 kilometres, centered on WGS84 dec. coordinates long 5.47 lat 52.92

15.12.2022 - 23.12.2022

Member State: Austria

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | STEIERMARK | |
| AT-HPAI(NON-P)-2022- 00021 | Magistrat Graz die Katastralgemeinden Graz-Stadt-Fälling, Ragnitz, Stifting, Graz Stadt-Weinitzen, Wenisbuch; im Bezirk Graz-Umgebung: in der Gemeinde Kainbach bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden Hönigthal, Kainbach, Schafthal; in der Gemeinde Sankt Radegund bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden St. Radegund, Rinnegg und Schöckl, in der Gemeinde Stattegg die Katastralgemeinde Stattegg, in der Gemeinde Weinitzen die Katastralgemeinden Fälling, Niederschöckl und Weinitzen, in der Gemeinde Eggersdorf bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden Affenberg, Brodersdorf, Edelsbach, Eggersdorf, Höf und Präbach; im Bezirk Weiz in der Gemeinde Ludersdorf-Wilfersdorf die Katastralgemeinden Pircha und Wilfersdorf; in der Gemeinde Mitterdorf an der Raab die Katastralgemeinden Dörfl, Hohenkogl, Mitterdorf, Oberdorf bei Stadl, Obergreith, Pichl, Untergreith; in der Gemeinde Mortantsch die Katastralgemeinden Göttelsberg, Hafning, Haselbach, Leska, Mortantsch, Steinberg; in der Gemeinde Naas die Katastralgemeinde Birchbaum, in der Gemeinde Gutenberg-Stenzengreith die Katrastralgemeinden Garrach, Kleinsemmering, Stenzengreith, Stockheim; in der Gemeinde St. Ruprecht an der Raab die Katastralgemeinden Arndorf, Dietmanndorf, Fünfing bei St. Ruprecht, Grub, Neudorf bei St. Ruprecht, St. Ruprecht an der Raab, Unterfladnitz und Wolfsgruben bei St. Ruprecht; in der Gemeinde Weiz die Katastralgemeinden Farcha, Krottendorf, Preding, Reggerstätten und Weiz | 12.12.2022 |
| Bezirk Graz-Umgebung: in der Gemeinde Kumberg die Katastralgemeinden Gschwendt, Hofstätten, Kumberg und Rabnitz und in der Gemeinde Eggersdorf bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden Hart bei Eggersdorf, Haselbach und Purgstall | 4.12.2022- 12.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

STEIERMARK

AT-HPAI(NON-P)-2022- 00021

Magistrat Graz die Katastralgemeinden Graz-Stadt-Fälling, Ragnitz, Stifting, Graz Stadt-Weinitzen, Wenisbuch; im Bezirk Graz-Umgebung: in der Gemeinde Kainbach bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden Hönigthal, Kainbach, Schafthal; in der Gemeinde Sankt Radegund bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden St. Radegund, Rinnegg und Schöckl, in der Gemeinde Stattegg die Katastralgemeinde Stattegg, in der Gemeinde Weinitzen die Katastralgemeinden Fälling, Niederschöckl und Weinitzen, in der Gemeinde Eggersdorf bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden Affenberg, Brodersdorf, Edelsbach, Eggersdorf, Höf und Präbach; im Bezirk Weiz in der Gemeinde Ludersdorf-Wilfersdorf die Katastralgemeinden Pircha und Wilfersdorf; in der Gemeinde Mitterdorf an der Raab die Katastralgemeinden Dörfl, Hohenkogl, Mitterdorf, Oberdorf bei Stadl, Obergreith, Pichl, Untergreith; in der Gemeinde Mortantsch die Katastralgemeinden Göttelsberg, Hafning, Haselbach, Leska, Mortantsch, Steinberg; in der Gemeinde Naas die Katastralgemeinde Birchbaum, in der Gemeinde Gutenberg-Stenzengreith die Katrastralgemeinden Garrach, Kleinsemmering, Stenzengreith, Stockheim; in der Gemeinde St. Ruprecht an der Raab die Katastralgemeinden Arndorf, Dietmanndorf, Fünfing bei St. Ruprecht, Grub, Neudorf bei St. Ruprecht, St. Ruprecht an der Raab, Unterfladnitz und Wolfsgruben bei St. Ruprecht; in der Gemeinde Weiz die Katastralgemeinden Farcha, Krottendorf, Preding, Reggerstätten und Weiz

12.12.2022

Bezirk Graz-Umgebung: in der Gemeinde Kumberg die Katastralgemeinden Gschwendt, Hofstätten, Kumberg und Rabnitz und in der Gemeinde Eggersdorf bei Graz die Katastralgemeinden Hart bei Eggersdorf, Haselbach und Purgstall

4.12.2022- 12.12.2022

United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)

| ADIS reference number of the outbreak | Area comprising: | Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| |
| IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00001 | The area of the parts of County Fermanagh extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2073 and E -7,2153 | 16.12.2022 |
| Those parts of County Fermanagh contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2073 and E -7,2153 | 8.12.2022- 16.12.2022 |
| IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00003 | The area of the parts of County Fermanagh extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2093 and E -7,2219 | 22.12.2022 |
| Those parts of County Fermanagh contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2093 and E -7,2219 | 14.12.2022 – 22.12.2022 |

ADIS reference number of the outbreak

Area comprising:

Date until applicable in accordance with Article 55 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687

IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00001

The area of the parts of County Fermanagh extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2073 and E -7,2153

16.12.2022

Those parts of County Fermanagh contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2073 and E -7,2153

8.12.2022- 16.12.2022

IE-HPAI(P)-2022-00003

The area of the parts of County Fermanagh extending beyond the area described in the protection zone and within the circle of a radius of 10 kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2093 and E -7,2219

22.12.2022

Those parts of County Fermanagh contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on GPS coordinates N 54,2093 and E -7,2219

14.12.2022 – 22.12.2022

Part C

Further restricted zones in the concerned Member States* as referred to in Articles 1 and 3a:

Member State: France

| Area comprising: | Date until measures are to remain applicable in accordance with Article 3a |
| --- | --- |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Calvados (14) |
| CERNAY
  LA FOLLETIÈRE-ABENON
  ORBEC
  SAINT-MARTIN-DE-BIENFAITE-LA-CRESSONNIÈRE
  LA VESPIÈRE-FRIARDEL
  MEULLES*
  PREAUX-SAINT-SEBASTIEN*
  FAMILLY*
  CERQUEUX*
  LIVAROT-PAYS-D’AUGE | 16.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Charente-Maritime (17) |
| ANDILLY
  CHARRON
  ESNANDES
  MARANS
  MARSILLY
  SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY
  SAINT-OUEN-D’AUNIS
  VILLEDOUX | 30.11.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Cher (18) |
| GENOUILLY
  GRACAY
  NOHANT-EN-GRACAY
  SAINT-OUTRILLE | 3.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Eure (27) |
| AMBENAY
  LES BAUX-DE-BRETEUIL
  BOIS-ANZERAY
  BOIS-ARNAULT
  BOIS-NORMAND-PRES-LYRE
  BROGLIE
  CAORCHES-SAINT-NICOLAS
  CAPELLE-LES-GRANDS
  CHAMPIGNOLLES
  LA CHAPELLE-GAUTHIER
  FERRIERES-SAINT-HILAIRE
  LA FERRIERE-SUR-RISLE
  LE FIDELAIRE
  GRAND-CAMP
  MESNIL-EN-OUCHE (partie est/D49)
  NEAUFLES-AUVERGNY
  LA NEUVE-LYRE
  LE NOYER-EN-OUCHE
  RUGLES
  SAINT-ANTONIN-DE-SOMMAIRE
  SAINT-AUBIN-DU-THENNEY
  SAINT-AUBIN-LE-VERTUEUX
  SAINT-GERMAIN-LA-CAMPAGNE
  SAINT-JEAN-DU-THENNEY
  SAINT-MARDS-DE-FRESNE
  SAINT-QUENTIN-DES-ISLES
  SAINT-VICTOR-DE-CHRETIENVILLE
  LA VIEILLE-LYRE | 16.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Indre (36) |
| ANJOUIN
  ARGY
  BAGNEUX
  BRION
  CHABRIS
  LA CHAMPENOISE
  DUN-LE-POELIER
  FRANCILLON
  FREDILLE
  GEHEE
  GIROUX
  HEUGNES
  JEU-MALOCHES
  LANGE: Ouest du Nahon
  LEVROUX: Sud de la D8
  LIZERAY
  LUCAY-LE-LIBRE
  LUCAY-LE-MALE
  MENETOU-SUR-NAHON
  MENETREOLS-SOUS-VATAN
  MEUNET-SUR-VATAN
  MOULINS-SUR-CEPHONS: Sud de la D8
  ORVILLE: A l’est de la D25
  PAUDY
  PELLEVOISIN
  REBOURSIN
  SAINT-CHRISTOPHE-EN-BAZELLE
  SAINT-VALENTIN
  SELLES-SUR-NAHON
  SEMBLECAY
  SOUGE
  VALENCAY: Nord-Ouest du Nahon
  VAL-FOUZON
  VATAN
  VEUIL
  VICQ-SUR-NAHON: A l’ouest du Nahon
  VILLEGONGIS
  VINEUIL | 9.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Loiret (45) |
| AUXY
  BATILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BEAUNE-LA-ROLANDE
  BOISCOMMUN
  BONNÉE
  BORDEAUX-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BRAY-SAINT AIGNAN
  CHAMBON-LA-FORÊT
  CHAPELON
  CHÂTEAUNEUF-SUR-LOIRE
  COMBREUX
  CORBEILLES
  CORQUILLEROY
  ÉGRY
  GAUBERTIN
  GERMIGNY-DES-PRÉS
  GONDREVILLE
  INGRANNES
  JURANVILLE
  LANGESSE
  LE MOULINET-SUR-SOLIN
  LES BORDES
  LOMBREUIL
  LORCY
  MIGNÈRES
  MIGNERETTE
  MONTBARROIS
  MONTEREAU
  MORMANT-SUR-VERNISSON
  MOULON
  NANCRAY-SUR-RIMARDE
  NIBELLE
  OUSSOY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  OUZOUER-DES-CHAMPS
  OUZOUER-SUR-LOIRE
  PANNES
  SAINT-BENOÎT-SUR-LOIRE
  SAINT-HILAIRE-SUR-PUISEAUX
  SAINT-LOUP-DES-VIGNES
  SAINT-MARTIN-D’ABBAT
  SAINT-MAURICE-SUR-FESSARD
  SAINT-MICHEL
  SAINT-PÈRE-SUR-LOIRE
  SEICHEBRIÈRES
  SOLTERRE
  VARENNES-CHANGY
  VILLEMANDEUR
  VILLEVOQUES
  VIMORY
  VITRY-AUX-LOGES | 19.12.2022 |
| AMILLY
  AUXY
  BATILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS
  BEAUNE-LA-ROLANDE
  BOISCOMMUN
  BOISMORAND
  BONNÉE
  BORDEAUX-EN-GÂTINAIS
  LES BORDES
  BRAY-SAINT AIGNAN
  CHÂLETTE-SUR-LOING
  CHAMBON-LA-FORÊT
  CHAPELON
  CHÂTEAUNEUF-SUR-LOIRE
  LES CHOUX
  COMBREUX
  CONFLANS-SUR-LOING
  CORBEILLES
  CORQUILLEROY
  CORTRAT
  DAMPIERRE-EN-BURLY
  ÉGRY
  GAUBERTIN
  GERMIGNY-DES-PRÉS
  GONDREVILLE
  INGRANNES
  JURANVILLE
  LANGESSE
  LES BORDES
  LORCY
  MIGNÈRES
  MIGNERETTE
  MONTARGIS
  MONTBARROIS
  MONTCRESSON
  MORMANT-SUR-VERNISSON
  MOULON
  NANCRAY-SUR-RIMARDE
  NEVOY
  NIBELLE
  NOGENT-SUR-VERNISSON
  OUZOUER-DES-CHAMPS
  OUZOUER-SUR-LOIRE
  PANNES
  PRESSIGNY-LES-PINS
  SAINT-BENOÎT-SUR-LOIRE
  SAINT-HILAIRE-SUR-PUISEAUX
  SAINT-LOUP-DES-VIGNES
  SAINT-MARTIN-D’ABBAT
  SAINT-MICHEL
  SAINT-PÈRE-SUR-LOIRE
  SEICHEBRIÈRES
  SOLTERRE
  VILLEMANDEUR
  VILLEVOQUES
  VIMORY
  VITRY-AUX-LOGES | 19.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Nord (59) |
| ARMENTIERES
  AUBERS
  BEAUCAMPS-LIGNY
  BERTHEN
  BLARINGHEM
  BOESCHEPE
  BOESEGHEM
  BOIS-GRENIER
  BORRE
  CAESTRE
  CAPINGHEM
  CASSEL
  DEULEMONT
  EECKE
  ENGLOS
  ENNETIERES-EN-WEPPES
  ERQUINGHEM-LE-SEC
  ESCOBECQUES
  FOURNES-EN-WEPPES
  FRELINGHIEN
  FROMELLES
  GODEWAERSVELDE
  HALLENNES-LEZ-HAUBOURDIN
  HANTAY
  HAVERSKERQUE
  HAZEBROUCK
  HERLIES
  HONDEGHEM
  HOUPLINES
  ILLIES
  LA BASSEE
  LA CHAPELLE-D’ARMENTIERES
  LE MAISNIL
  LYNDE
  MARQUILLIES
  MORBECQUE
  OXELAERE
  PERENCHIES
  PRADELLES
  PREMESQUES
  QUESNOY-SUR-DEULE
  RADINGHEM-EN-WEPPES
  SAINGHIN-EN-WEPPES
  SAINT-JANS-CAPPEL
  SAINT-SYLVESTRE-CAPPEL
  SAINTE-MARIE-CAPPEL
  SALOME
  SANTES
  SEQUEDIN
  SERCUS
  STEENBECQUE
  STEENVOORDE
  TERDEGHEM
  THIENNES
  VERLINGHEM
  WALLON-CAPPEL
  WARNETON
  WAVRIN
  WICRES
  FLETRE | 17.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Orne (61) |
| AUBE
  AVERNES-SAINT-GOURGON
  BEAUFAI
  LE BOSC-RENOULT
  BRETHEL
  CHAUMONT
  CISAI-SAINT-AUBIN
  ECORCEI
  LA FERTE-EN-OUCHE
  LA GONFRIERE
  L’AIGLE
  NEUVILLE-SUR-TOUQUES
  RAI
  SAINT-AUBIN-DE-BONNEVAL
  SAINT-EVROULT-DE-MONTFORT
  SAINT-EVROULT-NOTRE-DAME-DU-BOIS
  SAINT-GERMAIN-D’AUNAY
  SAINT-HILAIRE-SUR-RISLE
  SAINT-MARTIN-D’ECUBLEI
  SAINT-NICOLAS-DE-SOMMAIRE
  SAINT-PIERRE-DES-LOGES
  SAINT-SULPICE-SUR-RISLE
  SAINT-SYMPHORIEN-DES-BRUYERES
  SAP-EN-AUGE
  LE SAP-ANDRE
  TOUQUETTES
  LA TRINITE-DES-LAITIERS | 16.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Pas-de-Calais (62) |
| ABLAIN-SAINT-NAZAIRE
  AGNIERES
  AIRE-SUR-LA-LYS
  AIX-NOULETTE
  ANGRES
  ANNEQUIN
  ANVIN
  AUBIGNY-EN-ARTOIS
  AUCHY-LES-MINES
  AVERDOINGT
  BAILLEUL-AUX-CORNAILLES
  BAJUS
  BARLIN
  BERGUENEUSE
  BERLES-MONCHEL
  BETHONSART
  BILLY-BERCLAU
  BLESSY
  BOMY
  BOURS
  BOVIGNY-BOYEFFLES
  BOYAVAL
  BRIAS
  BULLY-LES-MINES
  CAMBLAIN-L’ABBE
  CAMBLIGNEUL
  CAMBRIN
  CARENCY
  CAUCOURT
  CHELERS
  CONTEVILLE-EN-TERNOIS
  CUINCHY
  DOUVRINS
  EPS
  ERNY-SAINT-JULIEN
  ESTREE-BLANCHE
  ESTREE-CAUCHY
  FEBVIN-PALFART
  FESTUBERT
  FIEFS
  FLECHIN
  FONTAINE-LES-BOULANS
  FONTAINE-LES-HERMANS
  FRESNICOURT-LE-DOLMEN
  FREVILLERS
  GAUCHIN-LEGAL
  GAUCHIN-VERLOINGT
  GIVENCHY-LES-LA-BASSEE
  GOUY-SERVINS
  GRENAY
  HAISNES
  HERNICOURT
  HERSIN-COUPIGNY
  HESTRUS
  HEUCHIN
  HUCLIER
  HULLUCH
  LA COMTE
  LA THEULOYE
  LABOURSE
  LAIRES
  LAMBRES
  LIETTRES
  LIEVIN
  LIGNY-LES-AIRE
  LIGNY-SAINT-FLOCHEL
  LINGHEM
  LISBOURG
  LOOS-EN-GOHELLE
  MAGNICOURT-EN-COMTE
  MAMETZ
  MARQUAY
  MAZINGARBE
  MINGOVAL
  MONCHY-BRETON
  MONCHY-CAYEUX
  NEDON
  NEDONCHEL
  NOEUX-LES-MINES
  NOYELLES-LES-VERMELLES
  OSTREVILLE
  PREDEFIN
  QUERNES
  RELY
  ROELLECOURT
  ROMBLY
  ROQUETOIRE
  SACHIN
  SAILLY-LABOURSE
  SAINS-EN-GOHELLE
  SAINS-LES-PERNES
  SAINT-AUGUSTIN
  SAINT-MICHEL-SUR-TERNOISE
  SAINT-POL-SUR-TERNOISE
  SAVY-BERLETTE
  SERVINS
  TANGRY
  TINCQUES
  TROISVAUX
  VALHUON
  VERMELLES
  VILLERS-AU-BOIS
  VILLERS-BRULIN
  VILLERS-CHATEL
  VIOLAINES
  WESTREHEM
  WITTERNESSE
  WITTES | 19.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Seine-et-Marne (77) |
| ANDREZEL
  ARGENTIERES
  AUBEPIERRE-OZOUER-LE-REPOS
  AVON
  BEAUVOIR
  BERNAY-VILBERT
  BLANDY
  BOIS-LE-ROI
  BOMBON
  BREAU
  CANNES-ECLUSE
  CESSOY-EN-MONTOIS
  CHAMPAGNE-SUR-SEINE
  CHAMPDEUIL
  CHAMPEAUX
  LA CHAPELLE-GAUTHIER
  LA CHAPELLE-IGER
  LA CHAPELLE-RABLAIS
  LA CHAPELLE-SAINT-SULPICE
  CHARTRETTES
  CHATEAUBLEAU
  LE CHATELET-EN-BRIE
  CHATENAY-SUR-SEINE
  CHATILLON-LA-BORDE
  CHATRES
  CHAUMES-EN-BRIE
  CHENOISE
  CLOS-FONTAINE
  COURCELLES-EN-BASSEE
  COURPALAY
  COURQUETAINE
  COURTOMER
  COUTENCON
  CRISENOY
  LA CROIX-EN-BRIE
  CUCHARMOY
  DONNEMARIE-DONTILLY
  ECHOUBOULAINS
  LES ECRENNES
  EGLIGNY
  ESMANS
  QUIERS
  FERICY
  FONTAINEBLEAU
  FONTAINE-LE-PORT
  FONTAINS
  FONTENAILLES
  FONTENAY-TRESIGNY
  FORGES
  FOUJU
  GASTINS
  LA GRANDE-PAROISSE
  GRANDPUITS-BAILLY-CARROIS
  GUIGNES
  GURCY-LE-CHATEL
  HERICY
  JOUY-LE-CHATEL
  LAVAL-EN-BRIE
  LIMOGES-FOURCHES
  LISSY
  LIVERDY-EN-BRIE
  LIVRY-SUR-SEINE
  LIZINES
  LUISETAINES
  LUMIGNY-NESLES-ORMEAUX
  MACHAULT
  MAINCY
  MAISON-ROUGE
  MARLES-EN-BRIE
  MAROLLES-SUR-SEINE
  MEIGNEUX
  MELUN
  MOISENAY
  MONS-EN-MONTOIS
  MONTEREAU-FAULT-YONNE
  MONTEREAU-SUR-LE-JARD
  MONTIGNY-LENCOUP
  MORET-LOING-ET-ORVANNE
  MORMANT
  NANGIS
  OZOUER-LE-VOULGIS
  PAMFOU
  PECY
  LE PLESSIS-FEU-AUSSOUX
  THENISY
  RAMPILLON
  LA ROCHETTE
  ROZAY-EN-BRIE
  RUBELLES
  SAINT-GERMAIN-LAVAL
  SAINT-GERMAIN-LAXIS
  SAINT-JUST-EN-BRIE
  SAINT-LOUP-DE-NAUD
  SAINT-MAMMES
  SAINT-MERY
  SAINT-OUEN-EN-BRIE
  SALINS
  SAMOIS-SUR-SEINE
  SAMOREAU
  SAVINS
  SIGY
  SIVRY-COURTRY
  SOGNOLLES-EN-MONTOIS
  SOIGNOLLES-EN-BRIE
  THOMERY
  LA TOMBE
  TOUQUIN
  VALENCE-EN-BRIE
  VANVILLE
  VARENNES-SUR-SEINE
  VAUDOY-EN-BRIE
  VAUX-LE-PENIL
  VERNEUIL-L’ETANG
  VERNOU-LA-CELLE-SUR-SEINE
  VIEUX-CHAMPAGNE
  VILLENEUVE-LES-BORDES
  VIMPELLES
  VOINSLES
  VOISENON
  VULAINES-LES-PROVINS
  VULAINES-SUR-SEINE
  YEBLES
  SOLERS | 1.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Somme (80) |
| AILLY-SUR-NOYE
  AILLY-SUR-SOMME
  ALLONVILLE
  ARGOEUVES
  AUBERCOURT
  AUBIGNY
  AUBVILLERS
  BEAUCOURT-EN-SANTERRE
  BEAUCOURT-SUR-L’HALLUE
  BEHENCOURT
  BERTANGLES
  BERTEAUCOURT-LES-THENNES
  BONNAY
  BOSQUEL
  BOUGAINVILLE
  BOVELLES
  BRACHES
  BREILLY
  BRIQUEMESNIL-FLOXICOURT
  BUSSY-LES-DAOURS
  CACHY
  CARDONNETTE
  CAVILLON
  CHAUSSOY-EPAGNY
  CHIRMONT
  CLAIRY-SAULCHOIX
  COISY
  CONTRE
  CONTY
  CORBIE
  CREUSE
  DAOURS
  DEMUIN
  DOMART-SUR-LA-LUCE
  DREUIL-LES-AMIENS
  ESCLAINVILLERS
  ESSERTAUX
  FERRIERES
  FLERS-SUR-NOYE
  FLESSELLES
  FLEURY
  FLUY
  FOLLEVILLE
  FOUILLOY
  FOURDRINOY
  FRANSURES
  FRANVILLERS
  FRECHENCOURT
  FREMONTIERS
  FRESNOY-AU-VAL
  GENTELLES (à l’est des rues Faidherbe, Leopold Jouancoux et de la voie communale n°204 de Gentelles à Daours)
  GRIVESNES
  GUIGNEMICOURT
  HAILLES
  HALLIVILLERS
  HAMELET
  HANGARD
  IGNAUCOURT
  LA CHAUSSEE-TIRANCOURT
  LA FALOISE
  LA NEUVILLE-SIRE-BERNARD
  LAHOUSSOYE
  LAWARDE-MAUGER-L’HORTOY
  LE HAMEL
  LE PLESSIER-ROZAINVILLERS
  LOEUILLY
  LOUVRECHY
  MAILLY-RAINEVAL
  MARCELCAVE
  MEZIERES-EN-SANTERRE
  MIRVAUX
  MOLLIENS-AU-BOIS
  MONSURES
  MONTIGNY-SUR-L’HALLUE
  MONTONVILLERS
  MOREUIL
  MORISEL
  NAMPS-MAISNIL
  NEUVILLE-LES-LOEUILLY
  OISSY
  PICQUIGNY
  PIERREGOT
  PISSY
  PONT-NOYELLES
  POULAINVILLE
  QUERRIEU
  QUEVAUVILLERS
  QUIRY-LE-SEC
  RAINNEVILLE
  REVELLES
  ROGY
  ROUVREL
  SAINT-GRATIEN
  SAINT-SAUVEUR
  SAINT-VAAST-EN-CHAUSSEE
  SAISSEVAL
  SAUVILLERS-MONGIVAL
  SEUX
  SOURDON
  THENNES
  THORY
  TILLOY-LES-CONTY
  VAIRE-SOUS-CORBIE
  VAUX-EN-AMIENOIS
  VAUX-SUR-SOMME
  VECQUEMONT
  VELENNES
  VILLERS-AUX-ERABLES
  VILLERS-BOCAGE
  VILLERS-BRETONNEUX | 21.12.2022 |
| Les communes suivantes dans le département: Tarn (81) |
| ALOS
  ALMAYRAC
  AMARENS
  AMBIALET
  ANDILLAC
  ANDOUQUE
  BELLEGARDE-MARSAL
  BLAYE-LES-MINES
  BRIATEXTE
  BROUSSE
  BROZE
  BUSQUE
  LES CABANNES
  CAHUZAC-SUR-VERE
  CARMAUX
  CASTELNAU-DE-MONTMIRAL
  COMBEFA
  CORDES-SUR-CIEL
  CRESPIN
  CRESPINET
  DONNAZAC
  FAUCH
  FRAUSSEILLES
  GAILLAC
  GRAULHET
  LABASTIDE-GABAUSSE
  LABESSIERE-CANDEIL
  LABOUTARIE
  LAUTREC
  LISLE-SUR-TARN
  LIVERS-CAZELLES
  LOUBERS
  MILHAVET
  MONESTIES
  MONTANS
  MONTDRAGON
  MONTELS
  MOULARES
  MOUZIEYS-TEULET
  NOAILLES
  PAMPELONNE
  PARISOT
  PAULINET
  PEYROLE
  PUYBEGON
  REALMONT
  ROSIERES
  TERRE-DE-BANCALIE
  SAINT-BENOIT-DE-CARMAUX
  SAINT-CIRGUE
  SAINTE-GEMME
  SAINT-GENEST-DE-CONTEST
  SAINT-GREGOIRE
  SAINT-JEAN-DE-MARCEL
  SAINT-JULIEN-DU-PUY
  SAINT-JULIEN-GAULENE
  SAINT-MARCEL-CAMPES
  SALLES
  SAUSSENAC
  LE SEGUR
  SERENAC
  SOUEL
  TECOU
  TEILLET
  TREVIEN
  VALDERIES
  VALENCE-D’ALBIGEOIS
  VENES
  LE VERDIER
  VIEUX
  VILLEFRANCHE-D’ALBIGEOIS
  VIRAC | 20.12.2022 |

Area comprising:

Date until measures are to remain applicable in accordance with Article 3a

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Calvados (14)

CERNAY

LA FOLLETIÈRE-ABENON

ORBEC

SAINT-MARTIN-DE-BIENFAITE-LA-CRESSONNIÈRE

LA VESPIÈRE-FRIARDEL

MEULLES*

PREAUX-SAINT-SEBASTIEN*

FAMILLY*

CERQUEUX*

LIVAROT-PAYS-D’AUGE

16.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Charente-Maritime (17)

ANDILLY

CHARRON

ESNANDES

MARANS

MARSILLY

SAINT-JEAN-DE-LIVERSAY

SAINT-OUEN-D’AUNIS

VILLEDOUX

30.11.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Cher (18)

GENOUILLY

GRACAY

NOHANT-EN-GRACAY

SAINT-OUTRILLE

3.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Eure (27)

AMBENAY

LES BAUX-DE-BRETEUIL

BOIS-ANZERAY

BOIS-ARNAULT

BOIS-NORMAND-PRES-LYRE

BROGLIE

CAORCHES-SAINT-NICOLAS

CAPELLE-LES-GRANDS

CHAMPIGNOLLES

LA CHAPELLE-GAUTHIER

FERRIERES-SAINT-HILAIRE

LA FERRIERE-SUR-RISLE

LE FIDELAIRE

GRAND-CAMP

MESNIL-EN-OUCHE (partie est/D49)

NEAUFLES-AUVERGNY

LA NEUVE-LYRE

LE NOYER-EN-OUCHE

RUGLES

SAINT-ANTONIN-DE-SOMMAIRE

SAINT-AUBIN-DU-THENNEY

SAINT-AUBIN-LE-VERTUEUX

SAINT-GERMAIN-LA-CAMPAGNE

SAINT-JEAN-DU-THENNEY

SAINT-MARDS-DE-FRESNE

SAINT-QUENTIN-DES-ISLES

SAINT-VICTOR-DE-CHRETIENVILLE

LA VIEILLE-LYRE

16.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Indre (36)

ANJOUIN

ARGY

BAGNEUX

BRION

CHABRIS

LA CHAMPENOISE

DUN-LE-POELIER

FRANCILLON

FREDILLE

GEHEE

GIROUX

HEUGNES

JEU-MALOCHES

LANGE: Ouest du Nahon

LEVROUX: Sud de la D8

LIZERAY

LUCAY-LE-LIBRE

LUCAY-LE-MALE

MENETOU-SUR-NAHON

MENETREOLS-SOUS-VATAN

MEUNET-SUR-VATAN

MOULINS-SUR-CEPHONS: Sud de la D8

ORVILLE: A l’est de la D25

PAUDY

PELLEVOISIN

REBOURSIN

SAINT-CHRISTOPHE-EN-BAZELLE

SAINT-VALENTIN

SELLES-SUR-NAHON

SEMBLECAY

SOUGE

VALENCAY: Nord-Ouest du Nahon

VAL-FOUZON

VATAN

VEUIL

VICQ-SUR-NAHON: A l’ouest du Nahon

VILLEGONGIS

VINEUIL

9.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Loiret (45)

AUXY

BATILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS

BEAUNE-LA-ROLANDE

BOISCOMMUN

BONNÉE

BORDEAUX-EN-GÂTINAIS

BRAY-SAINT AIGNAN

CHAMBON-LA-FORÊT

CHAPELON

CHÂTEAUNEUF-SUR-LOIRE

COMBREUX

CORBEILLES

CORQUILLEROY

ÉGRY

GAUBERTIN

GERMIGNY-DES-PRÉS

GONDREVILLE

INGRANNES

JURANVILLE

LANGESSE

LE MOULINET-SUR-SOLIN

LES BORDES

LOMBREUIL

LORCY

MIGNÈRES

MIGNERETTE

MONTBARROIS

MONTEREAU

MORMANT-SUR-VERNISSON

MOULON

NANCRAY-SUR-RIMARDE

NIBELLE

OUSSOY-EN-GÂTINAIS

OUZOUER-DES-CHAMPS

OUZOUER-SUR-LOIRE

PANNES

SAINT-BENOÎT-SUR-LOIRE

SAINT-HILAIRE-SUR-PUISEAUX

SAINT-LOUP-DES-VIGNES

SAINT-MARTIN-D’ABBAT

SAINT-MAURICE-SUR-FESSARD

SAINT-MICHEL

SAINT-PÈRE-SUR-LOIRE

SEICHEBRIÈRES

SOLTERRE

VARENNES-CHANGY

VILLEMANDEUR

VILLEVOQUES

VIMORY

VITRY-AUX-LOGES

19.12.2022

AMILLY

AUXY

BATILLY-EN-GÂTINAIS

BEAUNE-LA-ROLANDE

BOISCOMMUN

BOISMORAND

BONNÉE

BORDEAUX-EN-GÂTINAIS

LES BORDES

BRAY-SAINT AIGNAN

CHÂLETTE-SUR-LOING

CHAMBON-LA-FORÊT

CHAPELON

CHÂTEAUNEUF-SUR-LOIRE

LES CHOUX

COMBREUX

CONFLANS-SUR-LOING

CORBEILLES

CORQUILLEROY

CORTRAT

DAMPIERRE-EN-BURLY

ÉGRY

GAUBERTIN

GERMIGNY-DES-PRÉS

GONDREVILLE

INGRANNES

JURANVILLE

LANGESSE

LES BORDES

LORCY

MIGNÈRES

MIGNERETTE

MONTARGIS

MONTBARROIS

MONTCRESSON

MORMANT-SUR-VERNISSON

MOULON

NANCRAY-SUR-RIMARDE

NEVOY

NIBELLE

NOGENT-SUR-VERNISSON

OUZOUER-DES-CHAMPS

OUZOUER-SUR-LOIRE

PANNES

PRESSIGNY-LES-PINS

SAINT-BENOÎT-SUR-LOIRE

SAINT-HILAIRE-SUR-PUISEAUX

SAINT-LOUP-DES-VIGNES

SAINT-MARTIN-D’ABBAT

SAINT-MICHEL

SAINT-PÈRE-SUR-LOIRE

SEICHEBRIÈRES

SOLTERRE

VILLEMANDEUR

VILLEVOQUES

VIMORY

VITRY-AUX-LOGES

19.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Nord (59)

ARMENTIERES

AUBERS

BEAUCAMPS-LIGNY

BERTHEN

BLARINGHEM

BOESCHEPE

BOESEGHEM

BOIS-GRENIER

BORRE

CAESTRE

CAPINGHEM

CASSEL

DEULEMONT

EECKE

ENGLOS

ENNETIERES-EN-WEPPES

ERQUINGHEM-LE-SEC

ESCOBECQUES

FOURNES-EN-WEPPES

FRELINGHIEN

FROMELLES

GODEWAERSVELDE

HALLENNES-LEZ-HAUBOURDIN

HANTAY

HAVERSKERQUE

HAZEBROUCK

HERLIES

HONDEGHEM

HOUPLINES

ILLIES

LA BASSEE

LA CHAPELLE-D’ARMENTIERES

LE MAISNIL

LYNDE

MARQUILLIES

MORBECQUE

OXELAERE

PERENCHIES

PRADELLES

PREMESQUES

QUESNOY-SUR-DEULE

RADINGHEM-EN-WEPPES

SAINGHIN-EN-WEPPES

SAINT-JANS-CAPPEL

SAINT-SYLVESTRE-CAPPEL

SAINTE-MARIE-CAPPEL

SALOME

SANTES

SEQUEDIN

SERCUS

STEENBECQUE

STEENVOORDE

TERDEGHEM

THIENNES

VERLINGHEM

WALLON-CAPPEL

WARNETON

WAVRIN

WICRES

FLETRE

17.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Orne (61)

AUBE

AVERNES-SAINT-GOURGON

BEAUFAI

LE BOSC-RENOULT

BRETHEL

CHAUMONT

CISAI-SAINT-AUBIN

ECORCEI

LA FERTE-EN-OUCHE

LA GONFRIERE

L’AIGLE

NEUVILLE-SUR-TOUQUES

RAI

SAINT-AUBIN-DE-BONNEVAL

SAINT-EVROULT-DE-MONTFORT

SAINT-EVROULT-NOTRE-DAME-DU-BOIS

SAINT-GERMAIN-D’AUNAY

SAINT-HILAIRE-SUR-RISLE

SAINT-MARTIN-D’ECUBLEI

SAINT-NICOLAS-DE-SOMMAIRE

SAINT-PIERRE-DES-LOGES

SAINT-SULPICE-SUR-RISLE

SAINT-SYMPHORIEN-DES-BRUYERES

SAP-EN-AUGE

LE SAP-ANDRE

TOUQUETTES

LA TRINITE-DES-LAITIERS

16.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Pas-de-Calais (62)

ABLAIN-SAINT-NAZAIRE

AGNIERES

AIRE-SUR-LA-LYS

AIX-NOULETTE

ANGRES

ANNEQUIN

ANVIN

AUBIGNY-EN-ARTOIS

AUCHY-LES-MINES

AVERDOINGT

BAILLEUL-AUX-CORNAILLES

BAJUS

BARLIN

BERGUENEUSE

BERLES-MONCHEL

BETHONSART

BILLY-BERCLAU

BLESSY

BOMY

BOURS

BOVIGNY-BOYEFFLES

BOYAVAL

BRIAS

BULLY-LES-MINES

CAMBLAIN-L’ABBE

CAMBLIGNEUL

CAMBRIN

CARENCY

CAUCOURT

CHELERS

CONTEVILLE-EN-TERNOIS

CUINCHY

DOUVRINS

EPS

ERNY-SAINT-JULIEN

ESTREE-BLANCHE

ESTREE-CAUCHY

FEBVIN-PALFART

FESTUBERT

FIEFS

FLECHIN

FONTAINE-LES-BOULANS

FONTAINE-LES-HERMANS

FRESNICOURT-LE-DOLMEN

FREVILLERS

GAUCHIN-LEGAL

GAUCHIN-VERLOINGT

GIVENCHY-LES-LA-BASSEE

GOUY-SERVINS

GRENAY

HAISNES

HERNICOURT

HERSIN-COUPIGNY

HESTRUS

HEUCHIN

HUCLIER

HULLUCH

LA COMTE

LA THEULOYE

LABOURSE

LAIRES

LAMBRES

LIETTRES

LIEVIN

LIGNY-LES-AIRE

LIGNY-SAINT-FLOCHEL

LINGHEM

LISBOURG

LOOS-EN-GOHELLE

MAGNICOURT-EN-COMTE

MAMETZ

MARQUAY

MAZINGARBE

MINGOVAL

MONCHY-BRETON

MONCHY-CAYEUX

NEDON

NEDONCHEL

NOEUX-LES-MINES

NOYELLES-LES-VERMELLES

OSTREVILLE

PREDEFIN

QUERNES

RELY

ROELLECOURT

ROMBLY

ROQUETOIRE

SACHIN

SAILLY-LABOURSE

SAINS-EN-GOHELLE

SAINS-LES-PERNES

SAINT-AUGUSTIN

SAINT-MICHEL-SUR-TERNOISE

SAINT-POL-SUR-TERNOISE

SAVY-BERLETTE

SERVINS

TANGRY

TINCQUES

TROISVAUX

VALHUON

VERMELLES

VILLERS-AU-BOIS

VILLERS-BRULIN

VILLERS-CHATEL

VIOLAINES

WESTREHEM

WITTERNESSE

WITTES

19.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Seine-et-Marne (77)

ANDREZEL

ARGENTIERES

AUBEPIERRE-OZOUER-LE-REPOS

AVON

BEAUVOIR

BERNAY-VILBERT

BLANDY

BOIS-LE-ROI

BOMBON

BREAU

CANNES-ECLUSE

CESSOY-EN-MONTOIS

CHAMPAGNE-SUR-SEINE

CHAMPDEUIL

CHAMPEAUX

LA CHAPELLE-GAUTHIER

LA CHAPELLE-IGER

LA CHAPELLE-RABLAIS

LA CHAPELLE-SAINT-SULPICE

CHARTRETTES

CHATEAUBLEAU

LE CHATELET-EN-BRIE

CHATENAY-SUR-SEINE

CHATILLON-LA-BORDE

CHATRES

CHAUMES-EN-BRIE

CHENOISE

CLOS-FONTAINE

COURCELLES-EN-BASSEE

COURPALAY

COURQUETAINE

COURTOMER

COUTENCON

CRISENOY

LA CROIX-EN-BRIE

CUCHARMOY

DONNEMARIE-DONTILLY

ECHOUBOULAINS

LES ECRENNES

EGLIGNY

ESMANS

QUIERS

FERICY

FONTAINEBLEAU

FONTAINE-LE-PORT

FONTAINS

FONTENAILLES

FONTENAY-TRESIGNY

FORGES

FOUJU

GASTINS

LA GRANDE-PAROISSE

GRANDPUITS-BAILLY-CARROIS

GUIGNES

GURCY-LE-CHATEL

HERICY

JOUY-LE-CHATEL

LAVAL-EN-BRIE

LIMOGES-FOURCHES

LISSY

LIVERDY-EN-BRIE

LIVRY-SUR-SEINE

LIZINES

LUISETAINES

LUMIGNY-NESLES-ORMEAUX

MACHAULT

MAINCY

MAISON-ROUGE

MARLES-EN-BRIE

MAROLLES-SUR-SEINE

MEIGNEUX

MELUN

MOISENAY

MONS-EN-MONTOIS

MONTEREAU-FAULT-YONNE

MONTEREAU-SUR-LE-JARD

MONTIGNY-LENCOUP

MORET-LOING-ET-ORVANNE

MORMANT

NANGIS

OZOUER-LE-VOULGIS

PAMFOU

PECY

LE PLESSIS-FEU-AUSSOUX

THENISY

RAMPILLON

LA ROCHETTE

ROZAY-EN-BRIE

RUBELLES

SAINT-GERMAIN-LAVAL

SAINT-GERMAIN-LAXIS

SAINT-JUST-EN-BRIE

SAINT-LOUP-DE-NAUD

SAINT-MAMMES

SAINT-MERY

SAINT-OUEN-EN-BRIE

SALINS

SAMOIS-SUR-SEINE

SAMOREAU

SAVINS

SIGY

SIVRY-COURTRY

SOGNOLLES-EN-MONTOIS

SOIGNOLLES-EN-BRIE

THOMERY

LA TOMBE

TOUQUIN

VALENCE-EN-BRIE

VANVILLE

VARENNES-SUR-SEINE

VAUDOY-EN-BRIE

VAUX-LE-PENIL

VERNEUIL-L’ETANG

VERNOU-LA-CELLE-SUR-SEINE

VIEUX-CHAMPAGNE

VILLENEUVE-LES-BORDES

VIMPELLES

VOINSLES

VOISENON

VULAINES-LES-PROVINS

VULAINES-SUR-SEINE

YEBLES

SOLERS

1.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Somme (80)

AILLY-SUR-NOYE

AILLY-SUR-SOMME

ALLONVILLE

ARGOEUVES

AUBERCOURT

AUBIGNY

AUBVILLERS

BEAUCOURT-EN-SANTERRE

BEAUCOURT-SUR-L’HALLUE

BEHENCOURT

BERTANGLES

BERTEAUCOURT-LES-THENNES

BONNAY

BOSQUEL

BOUGAINVILLE

BOVELLES

BRACHES

BREILLY

BRIQUEMESNIL-FLOXICOURT

BUSSY-LES-DAOURS

CACHY

CARDONNETTE

CAVILLON

CHAUSSOY-EPAGNY

CHIRMONT

CLAIRY-SAULCHOIX

COISY

CONTRE

CONTY

CORBIE

CREUSE

DAOURS

DEMUIN

DOMART-SUR-LA-LUCE

DREUIL-LES-AMIENS

ESCLAINVILLERS

ESSERTAUX

FERRIERES

FLERS-SUR-NOYE

FLESSELLES

FLEURY

FLUY

FOLLEVILLE

FOUILLOY

FOURDRINOY

FRANSURES

FRANVILLERS

FRECHENCOURT

FREMONTIERS

FRESNOY-AU-VAL

GENTELLES (à l’est des rues Faidherbe, Leopold Jouancoux et de la voie communale n°204 de Gentelles à Daours)

GRIVESNES

GUIGNEMICOURT

HAILLES

HALLIVILLERS

HAMELET

HANGARD

IGNAUCOURT

LA CHAUSSEE-TIRANCOURT

LA FALOISE

LA NEUVILLE-SIRE-BERNARD

LAHOUSSOYE

LAWARDE-MAUGER-L’HORTOY

LE HAMEL

LE PLESSIER-ROZAINVILLERS

LOEUILLY

LOUVRECHY

MAILLY-RAINEVAL

MARCELCAVE

MEZIERES-EN-SANTERRE

MIRVAUX

MOLLIENS-AU-BOIS

MONSURES

MONTIGNY-SUR-L’HALLUE

MONTONVILLERS

MOREUIL

MORISEL

NAMPS-MAISNIL

NEUVILLE-LES-LOEUILLY

OISSY

PICQUIGNY

PIERREGOT

PISSY

PONT-NOYELLES

POULAINVILLE

QUERRIEU

QUEVAUVILLERS

QUIRY-LE-SEC

RAINNEVILLE

REVELLES

ROGY

ROUVREL

SAINT-GRATIEN

SAINT-SAUVEUR

SAINT-VAAST-EN-CHAUSSEE

SAISSEVAL

SAUVILLERS-MONGIVAL

SEUX

SOURDON

THENNES

THORY

TILLOY-LES-CONTY

VAIRE-SOUS-CORBIE

VAUX-EN-AMIENOIS

VAUX-SUR-SOMME

VECQUEMONT

VELENNES

VILLERS-AUX-ERABLES

VILLERS-BOCAGE

VILLERS-BRETONNEUX

21.12.2022

Les communes suivantes dans le département: Tarn (81)

ALOS

ALMAYRAC

AMARENS

AMBIALET

ANDILLAC

ANDOUQUE

BELLEGARDE-MARSAL

BLAYE-LES-MINES

BRIATEXTE

BROUSSE

BROZE

BUSQUE

LES CABANNES

CAHUZAC-SUR-VERE

CARMAUX

CASTELNAU-DE-MONTMIRAL

COMBEFA

CORDES-SUR-CIEL

CRESPIN

CRESPINET

DONNAZAC

FAUCH

FRAUSSEILLES

GAILLAC

GRAULHET

LABASTIDE-GABAUSSE

LABESSIERE-CANDEIL

LABOUTARIE

LAUTREC

LISLE-SUR-TARN

LIVERS-CAZELLES

LOUBERS

MILHAVET

MONESTIES

MONTANS

MONTDRAGON

MONTELS

MOULARES

MOUZIEYS-TEULET

NOAILLES

PAMPELONNE

PARISOT

PAULINET

PEYROLE

PUYBEGON

REALMONT

ROSIERES

TERRE-DE-BANCALIE

SAINT-BENOIT-DE-CARMAUX

SAINT-CIRGUE

SAINTE-GEMME

SAINT-GENEST-DE-CONTEST

SAINT-GREGOIRE

SAINT-JEAN-DE-MARCEL

SAINT-JULIEN-DU-PUY

SAINT-JULIEN-GAULENE

SAINT-MARCEL-CAMPES

SALLES

SAUSSENAC

LE SEGUR

SERENAC

SOUEL

TECOU

TEILLET

TREVIEN

VALDERIES

VALENCE-D’ALBIGEOIS

VENES

LE VERDIER

VIEUX

VILLEFRANCHE-D’ALBIGEOIS

VIRAC

20.12.2022

Member State: Italy

| Area comprising: | Date until measures are to remain applicable in accordance with Article 3a |
| --- | --- |
| Region: Lombardia |
| — | Municipality of Acquafredda (Brescia) |

Area comprising:

Date until measures are to remain applicable in accordance with Article 3a

Region: Lombardia

—

Municipality of Acquafredda (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Alfianello (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Alfianello (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Bassano Bresciano (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Bassano Bresciano (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Borgo San Giacomo (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Borgo San Giacomo (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Calvisano (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Calvisano (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Carpenedolo (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Carpenedolo (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Cigole (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Cigole (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Desenzano del Garda (Brescia) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Desenzano del Garda (Brescia) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Fiesse (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Fiesse (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Gambara (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Gambara (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Ghedi (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Ghedi (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Gottolengo (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Gottolengo (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Isorella (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Isorella (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Leno (Brescia) East of A21 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Leno (Brescia) East of A21

| — | Municipality of Lonato del Garda (Brescia) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Lonato del Garda (Brescia) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Manerbio (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Manerbio (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Milzano (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Milzano (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Montichiari (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Montichiari (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Offlaga (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Offlaga (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Orzinuovi (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Orzinuovi (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Pavone del Mella (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Pavone del Mella (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Pontevico (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Pontevico (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Pozzolengo (Brescia) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Pozzolengo (Brescia) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Pralboino (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Pralboino (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Quinzano d’Oglio (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Quinzano d’Oglio (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Remedello (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Remedello (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of San Gervasio Bresciano (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of San Gervasio Bresciano (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of San Paolo (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of San Paolo (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Seniga (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Seniga (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Verolanuova (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Verolanuova (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Verolavecchia (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Verolavecchia (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Villachiara (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Villachiara (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Visano (Brescia) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Visano (Brescia)

| — | Municipality of Annicco (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Annicco (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Azzanello (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Azzanello (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Bordolano (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Bordolano (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Casalbuttano ed Uniti (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Casalbuttano ed Uniti (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Casalmorano (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Casalmorano (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Castelverde (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castelverde (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Castelvisconti (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castelvisconti (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Corte de’ Cortesi con Cignone (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Corte de’ Cortesi con Cignone (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Corte de’ Frati (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Corte de’ Frati (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Genivolta (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Genivolta (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Olmeneta (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Olmeneta (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Paderno Ponchielli (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Paderno Ponchielli (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Pozzaglio ed Uniti (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Pozzaglio ed Uniti (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Robecco d’Oglio (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Robecco d’Oglio (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Soresina (Cremona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Soresina (Cremona)

| — | Municipality of Acquanegra sul Chiese (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Acquanegra sul Chiese (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Asola (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Asola (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Canneto sull’Oglio (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Canneto sull’Oglio (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Casalmoro (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Casalmoro (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Casaloldo (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Casaloldo (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Casalromano (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Casalromano (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Castel Goffredo (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castel Goffredo (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Castelbelforte (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castelbelforte (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Castellucchio (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castellucchio (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10

| — | Municipality of Castiglione delle Stiviere (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castiglione delle Stiviere (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Cavriana (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Cavriana (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Ceresara (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Ceresara (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Curtatone (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Curtatone (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10

| — | Municipality of Gazoldo degli Ippoliti (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Gazoldo degli Ippoliti (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Goito (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Goito (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Guidizzolo (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Guidizzolo (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Mantova (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Mantova (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10

| — | Municipality of Marcaria (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Marcaria (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10

| — | Municipality of Mariana Mantovana (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Mariana Mantovana (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Marmirolo (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Marmirolo (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Medole (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Medole (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Monzambano (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Monzambano (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Piubega (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Piubega (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Ponti sul Mincio (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Ponti sul Mincio (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Porto Mantovano (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Porto Mantovano (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Redondesco (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Redondesco (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Rodigo (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Rodigo (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Roverbella (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Roverbella (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of San Giorgio Bigarello (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of San Giorgio Bigarello (Mantova) North of SP64 ex SS10

| — | Municipality of Solferino (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Solferino (Mantova)

| — | Municipality of Volta Mantovana (Mantova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Volta Mantovana (Mantova)

31.1.2023

Region: Veneto

| — | Municipality of Arquà Petrarca (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Arquà Petrarca (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Baone (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Baone (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Barbona (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Barbona (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Borgo Veneto (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Borgo Veneto (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Carceri (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Carceri (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Casale di Scodosia (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Casale di Scodosia (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Castelbaldo (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castelbaldo (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Cervarese Santa Croce (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Cervarese Santa Croce (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Cinto Euganeo (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Cinto Euganeo (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Este (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Este (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Galzignano Terme (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Galzignano Terme (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Granze (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Granze (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Lozzo Atestino (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Lozzo Atestino (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Masi (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Masi (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Megliadino San Vitale (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Megliadino San Vitale (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Merlara (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Merlara (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Mestrino (Padova) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Mestrino (Padova) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Monselice (Padova) West of A13 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Monselice (Padova) West of A13

| — | Municipality of Montagnana (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Montagnana (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Ospedaletto Euganeo (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Ospedaletto Euganeo (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Piacenza d’Adige (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Piacenza d’Adige (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Ponso (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Ponso (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Pozzonovo (Padova) West of A13 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Pozzonovo (Padova) West of A13

| — | Municipality of Rovolon (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Rovolon (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Rubano (Padova) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Rubano (Padova) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Saccolongo (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Saccolongo (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Sant’Elena (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Sant’Elena (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Sant’Urbano (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Sant’Urbano (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Solesino (Padova) West of A13 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Solesino (Padova) West of A13

| — | Municipality of Stanghella (Padova) West of A13 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Stanghella (Padova) West of A13

| — | Municipality of Teolo (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Teolo (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Torreglia (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Torreglia (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Urbana (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Urbana (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Veggiano (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Veggiano (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Vescovana (Padova) West of A13 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Vescovana (Padova) West of A13

| — | Municipality of Vighizzolo d’Este (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Vighizzolo d’Este (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Villa Estense (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Villa Estense (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Villafranca Padovana (Padova) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Villafranca Padovana (Padova) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Vo’ (Padova) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Vo’ (Padova)

| — | Municipality of Albaredo d’Adige (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Albaredo d’Adige (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Angiari (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Angiari (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Arcole (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Arcole (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Belfiore (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Belfiore (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Bevilacqua (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Bevilacqua (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Bonavigo (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Bonavigo (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Boschi Sant’Anna (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Boschi Sant’Anna (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Bovolone (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Bovolone (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Buttapietra (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Buttapietra (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Caldiero (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Caldiero (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Casaleone (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Casaleone (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Castagnaro (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castagnaro (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Castel d’Azzano (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castel d’Azzano (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Castelnuovo del Garda (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castelnuovo del Garda (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Cerea (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Cerea (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Cologna Veneta (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Cologna Veneta (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Colognola ai Colli (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Colognola ai Colli (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Concamarise (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Concamarise (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Erbè (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Erbè (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Gazzo Veronese (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Gazzo Veronese (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Isola della Scala (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Isola della Scala (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Isola Rizza (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Isola Rizza (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Lavagno (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Lavagno (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Legnago (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Legnago (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Minerbe (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Minerbe (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Monteforte d’Alpone (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Monteforte d’Alpone (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Mozzecane (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Mozzecane (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Nogara (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Nogara (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Nogarole Rocca (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Nogarole Rocca (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Oppeano (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Oppeano (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Palù (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Palù (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Peschiera del Garda (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Peschiera del Garda (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Povegliano Veronese (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Povegliano Veronese (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Pressana (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Pressana (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Ronco all’Adige (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Ronco all’Adige (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Roverchiara (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Roverchiara (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Roveredo di Guá (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Roveredo di Guá (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Salizzole (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Salizzole (Verona)

| — | Municipality of San Bonifacio (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of San Bonifacio (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of San Giovanni Lupatoto (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of San Giovanni Lupatoto (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of San Martino Buon Albergo (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of San Martino Buon Albergo (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of San Pietro di Morubio (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of San Pietro di Morubio (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Sanguinetto (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Sanguinetto (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Soave (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Soave (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Sommacampagna (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Sommacampagna (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Sona (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Sona (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Sorgá (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Sorgá (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Terrazzo (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Terrazzo (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Trevenzuolo (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Trevenzuolo (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Valeggio sul Mincio (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Valeggio sul Mincio (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Verona (Verona) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Verona (Verona) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Veronella (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Veronella (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Vigasio (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Vigasio (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Villa Bartolomea (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Villa Bartolomea (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Villafranca di Verona (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Villafranca di Verona (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Zevio (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Zevio (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Zimella (Verona) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Zimella (Verona)

| — | Municipality of Agugliaro (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Agugliaro (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Albettone (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Albettone (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Alonte (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Alonte (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Altavilla Vicentina (Vicenza) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Altavilla Vicentina (Vicenza) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Arcugnano (Vicenza) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Arcugnano (Vicenza) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Asigliano Veneto (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Asigliano Veneto (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Barbarano Mossano (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Barbarano Mossano (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Brendola (Vicenza) East of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Brendola (Vicenza) East of A4

| — | Municipality of Campiglia dei Berici (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Campiglia dei Berici (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Castegnero (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Castegnero (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Gambellara (Vicenza) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Gambellara (Vicenza) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Grisignano di Zocco (Vicenza) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Grisignano di Zocco (Vicenza) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Grumolo delle Abbadesse (Vicenza) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Grumolo delle Abbadesse (Vicenza) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Longare (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Longare (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Lonigo (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Lonigo (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Montebello Vicentino (Vicenza) East of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Montebello Vicentino (Vicenza) East of A4

| — | Municipality of Montecchio Maggiore (Vicenza) East of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Montecchio Maggiore (Vicenza) East of A4

| — | Municipality of Montegalda (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Montegalda (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Montegaldella (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Montegaldella (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Nanto (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Nanto (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Noventa Vicentina (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Noventa Vicentina (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Orgiano (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Orgiano (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Pojana Maggiore (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Pojana Maggiore (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Sarego (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Sarego (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Sossano (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Sossano (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Torri di Quartesolo (Vicenza) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Torri di Quartesolo (Vicenza) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Val Liona (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Val Liona (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Vicenza (Vicenza) South of A4 |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Vicenza (Vicenza) South of A4

| — | Municipality of Villaga (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Villaga (Vicenza)

| — | Municipality of Zovencedo (Vicenza) |
| --- | --- |

—

Municipality of Zovencedo (Vicenza)

31.1.2023

| * | In accordance with the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 5(4) of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland in conjunction with Annex 2 to that Protocol, for the purposes of this Annex, references to Member State include the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland. |
| --- | --- |

*

---

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/96

---

COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2022/2421

of 5 December 2022

on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

(notified under document C(2022) 8733)

(Only the Greek text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 11(3) point (c), thereof,

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 of 11 February 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 (2), and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’), which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’), which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned.

| (2) | Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). Since those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). Since those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic.

3

| (3) | In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On that basis, in October 2021, Member States submitted to the Commission draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On that basis, in October 2021, Member States submitted to the Commission draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3.

4

5

| (4) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency and capacity performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of the Hellenic Republic (‘Greece’) are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency and capacity performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of the Hellenic Republic (‘Greece’) are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets.

6

en route

| (5) | In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

| (6) | On 13 July 2022, Greece submitted a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’). |
| --- | --- |

(6)

On 13 July 2022, Greece submitted a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’).

| (7) | The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan of Greece. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan of Greece.

| (8) | In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Regulation, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Regulation, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (9) | The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast published in June 2022 takes account of the change in circumstances with respect to air traffic in European airspace. On the basis of that forecast, the Commission notes that Greece is not foreseen to experience adverse changes in traffic over RP3 as a result of Russia’s war in Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast published in June 2022 takes account of the change in circumstances with respect to air traffic in European airspace. On the basis of that forecast, the Commission notes that Greece is not foreseen to experience adverse changes in traffic over RP3 as a result of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

| (10) | Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Greece regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) in accordance with point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Greece regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) in accordance with point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (11) | The local safety performance targets proposed by Greece in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:











  Greece | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from European Union Aviation Safety Agency level A to D |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Union-wide targets (2024) |
| HASP | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | C | C |
| Safety risk management | C | C | D | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | C | C |
| Safety promotion | C | C | C | C |
| Safety culture | C | C | C | C |

(11)

The local safety performance targets proposed by Greece in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:

Greece

Greece

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from European Union Aviation Safety Agency level A to D

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management

Air navigation service provider concerned

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

Safety management objective

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Union-wide targets (2024)

Union-wide targets (2024)

HASP

HASP

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety risk management

C

C

D

D

D

D

Safety assurance

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

C

C

C

| (12) | The safety performance targets proposed by Greece for the air navigation service provider, namely Hellenic Aviation Service Provider (‘HASP’), are consistent with the Union-wide performance target. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The safety performance targets proposed by Greece for the air navigation service provider, namely Hellenic Aviation Service Provider (‘HASP’), are consistent with the Union-wide performance target.

| (13) | The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece sets out measures for HASP for the achievement of the local safety targets, including measures relating to the training of staff, the reporting and investigation of occurrences, the conduct of safety management system audits, safety surveys, and change management. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece sets out measures for HASP for the achievement of the local safety targets, including measures relating to the training of staff, the reporting and investigation of occurrences, the conduct of safety management system audits, safety surveys, and change management.

| (14) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 11, 12 and 13 and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 are to be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets in the key performance area of safety included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 11, 12 and 13 and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 are to be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets in the key performance area of safety included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

| (15) | Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Greece regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed in accordance with point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available on 2 June 2021, the date of adoption of the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Greece regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed in accordance with point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available on 2 June 2021, the date of adoption of the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3.

en route

en route

| (16) | In respect of the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, in so far as the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, it is not possible to modify retroactively, in the revised draft performance plans, the local environment performance targets for year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

In respect of the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, in so far as the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, it is not possible to modify retroactively, in the revised draft performance plans, the local environment performance targets for year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (17) | The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Greece and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:









  Greece | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 1,92  % | 1,92  % | 1,92  % |
| Reference values | 1,92  % | 1,92  % | 1,92  % |

(17)

The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Greece and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:

en route

Greece

Greece

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

Targets in the key performance area of environment,

en route

1,92  %

1,92  %

1,92  %

1,92  %

1,92  %

1,92  %

Reference values

1,92  %

1,92  %

1,92  %

| (18) | The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Greece are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Greece are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (19) | The Commission notes that, in its revised draft performance plan, Greece has presented measures for the achievement of the local environment targets which mainly fulfil already existing legal requirements under Union law and include a performance-based navigation transition plan, air traffic service route improvements and the implementation of a 24-hour free route airspace. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The Commission notes that, in its revised draft performance plan, Greece has presented measures for the achievement of the local environment targets which mainly fulfil already existing legal requirements under Union law and include a performance-based navigation transition plan, air traffic service route improvements and the implementation of a 24-hour free route airspace.

| (20) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 17, 18 and 19, the targets the key performance area of environment included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

  Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of capacity |
| --- | --- |

(20)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 17, 18 and 19, the targets the key performance area of environment included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

| (21) | In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 the Commission concluded that the proposed en route capacity targets included in the draft performance plan of Greece submitted in 2021, regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight, were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Greece has proposed revised en route capacity targets as part of its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 the Commission concluded that the proposed en route capacity targets included in the draft performance plan of Greece submitted in 2021, regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight, were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Greece has proposed revised en route capacity targets as part of its revised draft performance plan.

en route

en route

en route

| (22) | In respect of the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, in so far as the period for the application of that target had expired and its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, it is not possible to modify retroactively, in the revised draft performance plans, the local capacity performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

In respect of the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, in so far as the period for the application of that target had expired and its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, it is not possible to modify retroactively, in the revised draft performance plans, the local capacity performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (23) | The following table sets out the initial RP3 draft en route capacity performance targets for the charging zone of Greece, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the revised performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan, and the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan available on 2 June 2021, the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3.









  Greece | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial en route capacity targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,26 | 0,20 | 0,20 |
| Revised en route capacity targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,14 | 0,15 | 0,15 |
| Reference values | 0,14 | 0,15 | 0,15 |

(23)

The following table sets out the initial RP3 draft en route capacity performance targets for the charging zone of Greece, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the revised performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan, and the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan available on 2 June 2021, the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3.

en route

Greece

Greece

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial en route capacity targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

Initial en route capacity targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

0,26

0,20

0,20

Revised en route capacity targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

Revised en route

0,14

0,14

0,15

0,15

0,15

0,15

Reference values

0,14

0,15

0,15

| (24) | The consistency of the revised en route capacity targets submitted by Greece has been assessed in accordance with point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, by comparing those targets with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available on 2 June 2021. The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Greece are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

The consistency of the revised en route capacity targets submitted by Greece has been assessed in accordance with point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, by comparing those targets with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available on 2 June 2021. The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Greece are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

en route

| (25) | The Commission notes that Greece has presented measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets in its revised draft performance plan. Those measures include an increase in the number of air traffic controller full time equivalents by the end of RP3, the introduction of a new ATM system and the implementation of 24-hour free route airspace. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

The Commission notes that Greece has presented measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets in its revised draft performance plan. Those measures include an increase in the number of air traffic controller full time equivalents by the end of RP3, the introduction of a new ATM system and the implementation of 24-hour free route airspace.

en route

| (26) | The Commission considers that Greece has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 2 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its capacity performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(26)

The Commission considers that Greece has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 2 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its capacity performance targets.

| (27) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 23 to 26, the targets in the key performance area of capacity included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(27)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 23 to 26, the targets in the key performance area of capacity included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

Review of capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

| (28) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1.(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1.(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

en route

| (29) | In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal capacity targets proposed by Greece in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Greece should further justify those targets or revise them downwards. |
| --- | --- |

(29)

In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal capacity targets proposed by Greece in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Greece should further justify those targets or revise them downwards.

| (30) | The Commission found that the terminal capacity targets of Greece remain unchanged in the revised draft performance plan. However, the Commission notes that Greece has duly justified and substantiated those performance targets, including by providing additional information on capacity enhancement measures to improve arrival ATFM delay performance during RP3. Furthermore, Greece reports that it has initiated a close collaboration with the Network Manager to improve arrival ATFM performance at several airports, including the airport of Athens. Having regard to the justifications provided by Greece, the Commission does not have any further observations on the terminal capacity targets contained in its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(30)

The Commission found that the terminal capacity targets of Greece remain unchanged in the revised draft performance plan. However, the Commission notes that Greece has duly justified and substantiated those performance targets, including by providing additional information on capacity enhancement measures to improve arrival ATFM delay performance during RP3. Furthermore, Greece reports that it has initiated a close collaboration with the Network Manager to improve arrival ATFM performance at several airports, including the airport of Athens. Having regard to the justifications provided by Greece, the Commission does not have any further observations on the terminal capacity targets contained in its revised draft performance plan.

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

| (31) | By Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 the Commission concluded that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Greece submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Greece has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets as part of its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(31)

By Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 the Commission concluded that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Greece submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Greece has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets as part of its revised draft performance plan.

en route

en route

| (32) | The following table sets out the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Greece, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022:













  En route charging zone of Greece | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 -2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 31,37 EUR | 23,20 EUR | 40,71 EUR | 32,60 EUR | 33,12 EUR | 32,93 EUR |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 31,37 EUR | 23,20 EUR | 40,71 EUR | 27,86 EUR | 26,96 EUR | 27,98 EUR |

(32)

The following table sets out the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Greece, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022:

en route

En route charging zone of Greece

En route

2014 baseline value

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 -2021

2020 -2021

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

31,37 EUR

31,37 EUR

23,20 EUR

23,20 EUR

40,71 EUR

40,71 EUR

32,60 EUR

32,60 EUR

33,12 EUR

33,12 EUR

32,93 EUR

32,93 EUR

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Revised en route

en route

31,37 EUR

31,37 EUR

23,20 EUR

23,20 EUR

40,71 EUR

40,71 EUR

27,86 EUR

27,86 EUR

26,96 EUR

26,96 EUR

27,98 EUR

27,98 EUR

| (33) | The Commission observes that Greece has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. Those targets result, when compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) which is 16,1 % lower over 2022, 2023 and 2024 and 11,6 % lower over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC reductions result both from the updated traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 and from the downward revision of the determined costs, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(33)

The Commission observes that Greece has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. Those targets result, when compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) which is 16,1 % lower over 2022, 2023 and 2024 and 11,6 % lower over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC reductions result both from the updated traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 and from the downward revision of the determined costs, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (34) | The Commission notes that the traffic forecast used in the revised draft performance plan is based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast. The changes to the traffic forecast for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 are presented in the following table:










  En route charging zone of Greece | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 5 445 | 5 888 | 6 140 |
| Updated traffic forecast (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 5 861 | 6 584 | 6 781 |
| Difference | +7,6  % | +11,8  % | +10,4  % |

(34)

The Commission notes that the traffic forecast used in the revised draft performance plan is based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast. The changes to the traffic forecast for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 are presented in the following table:

En route charging zone of Greece

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

5 445

5 445

5 888

5 888

6 140

6 140

Updated traffic forecast (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Updated traffic forecast

en route

5 861

5 861

6 584

6 584

6 781

6 781

Difference

Difference

+7,6  %

+7,6  %

+11,8  %

+11,8  %

+10,4  %

+10,4  %

| (35) | The revised determined costs for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are set out in the following table:










  En route charging zone of Greece | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 178 M EUR | 195 M EUR | 202 M EUR |
| Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the revised draft performance plan) | 163 M EUR | 178 M EUR | 190 M EUR |
| Difference | -8,0  % | -9,0  % | -6,1  % |

(35)

The revised determined costs for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are set out in the following table:

En route charging zone of Greece

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

178 M EUR

178 M EUR

195 M EUR

195 M EUR

202 M EUR

202 M EUR

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices

163 M EUR

163 M EUR

178 M EUR

178 M EUR

190 M EUR

190 M EUR

Difference

Difference

-8,0  %

-8,0  %

-9,0  %

-9,0  %

-6,1  %

-6,1  %

| (36) | The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Greece for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, as laid down in the following table:










  En route charging zone of Greece | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 102,3


  (0,8  %) | 103,3


  (1,0  %) | 104,9


  (1,6  %) |
| Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the revised draft performance plan) | 106,5


  (4,5  %) | 107,9


  (1,3  %) | 109,7


  (1,6  %) |

(36)

The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Greece for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, as laid down in the following table:

En route charging zone of Greece

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

102,3

102,3

(0,8  %)

(0,8  %)

103,3

103,3

(1,0  %)

(1,0  %)

104,9

104,9

(1,6  %)

(1,6  %)

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised inflation index

106,5

106,5

(4,5  %)

(4,5  %)

107,9

107,9

(1,3  %)

(1,3  %)

109,7

109,7

(1,6  %)

(1,6  %)

| (37) | Even though the updated inflation forecast is higher, the Commission observes that Greece revised downwards the nominal determined costs for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, as follows;










  En route charging zone of Greece | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 181 M EUR | 200 M EUR | 210 M EUR |
| Revised determined costs in nominal terms (included in the revised draft performance plan) | 172 M EUR | 189 M EUR | 204 M EUR |
| Difference | -4,8  % | -5,5  % | -2,6  % |

(37)

Even though the updated inflation forecast is higher, the Commission observes that Greece revised downwards the nominal determined costs for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, as follows;

En route charging zone of Greece

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

181 M EUR

181 M EUR

200 M EUR

200 M EUR

210 M EUR

210 M EUR

Revised determined costs in nominal terms (included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in nominal terms

172 M EUR

172 M EUR

189 M EUR

189 M EUR

204 M EUR

204 M EUR

Difference

Difference

-4,8  %

-4,8  %

-5,5  %

-5,5  %

-2,6  %

-2,6  %

| (38) | The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Greece in accordance with points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(38)

The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Greece in accordance with points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (39) | As regards point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +4,8 % over RP3 underperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this, however, constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +9,1 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan of Greece submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(39)

As regards point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +4,8 % over RP3 underperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this, however, constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +9,1 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan of Greece submitted in 2021.

en route

| (40) | As regards point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 of -1,3 % meets the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +0,5 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plans submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(40)

As regards point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 of -1,3 % meets the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +0,5 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plans submitted in 2021.

en route

| (41) | As regards point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the EUR 23,20 baseline value for the DUC of Greece expressed in 2017 prices is 18,9 % lower than the EUR 28,59 average baseline value in EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group. |
| --- | --- |

(41)

As regards point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the EUR 23,20 baseline value for the DUC of Greece expressed in 2017 prices is 18,9 % lower than the EUR 28,59 average baseline value in EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group.

| (42) | As specified in recital 40, it is clear that Greece’s revised cost-efficiency targets result in a long-term DUC trend over RP2 and RP3 which meets the corresponding Union-wide trend. Furthermore, the 2019 Greek baseline value is lower than the corresponding comparator group average by a considerable margin. Finally, the Commission notes that Greece has revised downwards the determined costs for RP3 both in real and nominal terms, whilst planning to serve additional traffic on the basis of the updated traffic forecast for RP3. Therefore, the Commission considers that, in respect of Greece, the deviation from the Union-wide RP3 DUC trend does not preclude the cost-efficiency performance targets from being consistent with the Union-wide cost-efficiency performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(42)

As specified in recital 40, it is clear that Greece’s revised cost-efficiency targets result in a long-term DUC trend over RP2 and RP3 which meets the corresponding Union-wide trend. Furthermore, the 2019 Greek baseline value is lower than the corresponding comparator group average by a considerable margin. Finally, the Commission notes that Greece has revised downwards the determined costs for RP3 both in real and nominal terms, whilst planning to serve additional traffic on the basis of the updated traffic forecast for RP3. Therefore, the Commission considers that, in respect of Greece, the deviation from the Union-wide RP3 DUC trend does not preclude the cost-efficiency performance targets from being consistent with the Union-wide cost-efficiency performance targets.

| (43) | The Commission therefore notes that Greece has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728. |
| --- | --- |

(43)

The Commission therefore notes that Greece has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728.

| (44) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 32 to 43, the targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(44)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 32 to 43, the targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

Review of revised cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of revised cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

| (45) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Articles 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of the en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(45)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Articles 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of the en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

en route

| (46) | In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal cost-efficiency targets proposed by Greece in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Greece was to further justify those targets or revise them downwards. The Commission notes that Greece has revised those targets downwards for the years 2022 and 2023 and upwards for the year 2024, without providing due justifications. |
| --- | --- |

(46)

In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal cost-efficiency targets proposed by Greece in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Greece was to further justify those targets or revise them downwards. The Commission notes that Greece has revised those targets downwards for the years 2022 and 2023 and upwards for the year 2024, without providing due justifications.

| (47) | The Commission observes that the terminal DUC trend of Greece of +7,7 % over RP3 remains higher than the actual terminal DUC trend of -3,9 % observed over RP2. Furthermore, the terminal RP3 DUC trend has worsened and is higher than the terminal DUC trend of +6,8 % observed in the draft performance plan of Greece submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(47)

The Commission observes that the terminal DUC trend of Greece of +7,7 % over RP3 remains higher than the actual terminal DUC trend of -3,9 % observed over RP2. Furthermore, the terminal RP3 DUC trend has worsened and is higher than the terminal DUC trend of +6,8 % observed in the draft performance plan of Greece submitted in 2021.

| (48) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 46 and 47, the Commission concludes that the revised terminal cost-efficiency performance targets of Greece continue to give rise to concerns. The Commission therefore reiterates its view that Greece should revise downwards those targets or provide adequate justifications for those targets, including for the additional cost increases applied in the year 2024. The Commission invites Greece to address those concerns in connection with the adoption of its final performance plan in accordance with Article 16, point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(48)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 46 and 47, the Commission concludes that the revised terminal cost-efficiency performance targets of Greece continue to give rise to concerns. The Commission therefore reiterates its view that Greece should revise downwards those targets or provide adequate justifications for those targets, including for the additional cost increases applied in the year 2024. The Commission invites Greece to address those concerns in connection with the adoption of its final performance plan in accordance with Article 16, point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

Review of the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 complementing the Commission’s assessment of capacity targets

Review of the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 complementing the Commission’s assessment of capacity targets

| (49) | In accordance with point 2.1(f) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has complemented its assessment of capacity targets by reviewing the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. In that respect, the Commission has examined whether the proposed incentive schemes fulfil the substantive requirements set out in Article 11(1) and (3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(49)

In accordance with point 2.1(f) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has complemented its assessment of capacity targets by reviewing the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. In that respect, the Commission has examined whether the proposed incentive schemes fulfil the substantive requirements set out in Article 11(1) and (3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (50) | In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission concluded that Greece is to revise its incentive schemes for achieving en route and terminal capacity targets in such a way that the maximum financial disadvantage stemming from those incentive schemes is set at a level having a material impact on the revenue at risk. The Commission notes that Greece has revised its incentive schemes for achieving en route and terminal capacity targets by setting the resulting maximum financial disadvantage at a level equal to 2 % and 1,5 % of determined costs respectively. That revision duly addresses the findings raised by the Commission in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728. The Commission does not have any further observations on the incentive schemes included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece. |
| --- | --- |

(50)

In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission concluded that Greece is to revise its incentive schemes for achieving en route and terminal capacity targets in such a way that the maximum financial disadvantage stemming from those incentive schemes is set at a level having a material impact on the revenue at risk. The Commission notes that Greece has revised its incentive schemes for achieving en route and terminal capacity targets by setting the resulting maximum financial disadvantage at a level equal to 2 % and 1,5 % of determined costs respectively. That revision duly addresses the findings raised by the Commission in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728. The Commission does not have any further observations on the incentive schemes included in the revised draft performance plan of Greece.

en route

en route

CONCLUSIONS

CONCLUSIONS

| (51) | In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission finds that the performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, |
| --- | --- |

(51)

In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission finds that the performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, and listed in the Annex to this Decision, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2022.

For the Commission

Adina VĂLEAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2019, p. 1.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 of 29 May 2019 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period starting on 1 January 2020 and ending on 31 December 2024 (OJ L 144, 3.6.2019, p. 49).

3

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 of 3 November 2020 on exceptional measures for the third reference period (2020-2024) of the single European sky performance and charging scheme due to COVID-19 pandemic (OJ L 366, 4.11.2020, p. 7).

4

(5)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 of 2 June 2021 setting revised Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period (2020-2024) and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (OJ L 195, 3.6.2021, p. 3).

5

(6)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 of 13 April 2022 on the inconsistency of certain performance targets contained in the draft national and functional airspace block performance plans submitted by Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (OJ L 135, 12.5.2022, p. 4).

6

---

ANNEX

Performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Greece pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY

Effectiveness of safety management

| Greece | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
| --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| HASP | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | C |
| Safety risk management | C | C | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | C |
| Safety promotion | C | C | C |
| Safety culture | C | C | C |

Greece

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

2022

2023

2024

HASP

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

C

Safety risk management

C

C

D

Safety assurance

C

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT

Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

| Greece | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 1,92  % | 1,92  % | 1,92  % |

Greece

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

1,92  %

1,92  %

1,92  %

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY

Average en route ATFM delay in minutes per flight

| Greece | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revised en route capacity targets, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,14 | 0,15 | 0,15 |

Greece

2022

2023

2024

Revised en route capacity targets, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

0,14

0,15

0,15

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

Determined unit cost for en route air navigation services

| En route charging zone of Greece | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020-2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 31,37 EUR | 23,20 EUR | 40,71 EUR | 27,86 EUR | 26,96 EUR | 27,98 EUR |

En route charging zone of Greece

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020-2021

2022

2023

2024

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

31,37 EUR

23,20 EUR

40,71 EUR

27,86 EUR

26,96 EUR

27,98 EUR

---

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/107 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/107

---

COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2022/2422

of 5 December 2022

on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Cyprus pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

(notified under document C(2022) 8719)

(Only the Greek text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 11(3) point (c), thereof,

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 of 11 February 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 (2), and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’), which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’), which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned.

| (2) | Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). As those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). As those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic.

3

| (3) | In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On this basis, Member States submitted to the Commission, in October 2021, draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On this basis, Member States submitted to the Commission, in October 2021, draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3.

4

5

| (4) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In respect of the draft performance plan for RP3 of Cyprus, the Commission found that the en route capacity and cost-efficiency performance targets are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In respect of the draft performance plan for RP3 of Cyprus, the Commission found that the en route capacity and cost-efficiency performance targets are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets.

6

en route

| (5) | In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

| (6) | Cyprus submitted, on 13 July 2022, a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’) for assessment to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Cyprus submitted, on 13 July 2022, a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’) for assessment to the Commission.

| (7) | The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan.

| (8) | Pursuant to Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets contained in the revised performance plan on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

Pursuant to Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets contained in the revised performance plan on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (9) | The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast published in June 2022 takes account of the changed circumstances referred to in recital (5). Based on that forecast, the Commission notes that Cyprus is not foreseen to experience adverse changes in traffic over RP3 as a result of Russia’s war in Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast published in June 2022 takes account of the changed circumstances referred to in recital (5). Based on that forecast, the Commission notes that Cyprus is not foreseen to experience adverse changes in traffic over RP3 as a result of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

| (10) | As Cyprus does not have any airport falling within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 in respect of RP3, there are no local performance targets for terminal air navigation services as part of its revised draft performance plan. Therefore, the findings contained in this Decision relate solely to en route air navigation services. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

As Cyprus does not have any airport falling within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 in respect of RP3, there are no local performance targets for terminal air navigation services as part of its revised draft performance plan. Therefore, the findings contained in this Decision relate solely to en route air navigation services.

en route

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

| (11) | Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Cyprus regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) based on the criterion laid down in point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Cyprus regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) based on the criterion laid down in point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (12) | The local safety performance targets proposed by Cyprus in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:











  Cyprus | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from European Union Aviation Safety Agency level A to D |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Union-wide targets




  (2024) |
| CYATS | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | C | C |
| Safety risk management | D | D | D | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | C | C |
| Safety promotion | C | C | C | C |
| Safety culture | C | C | C | C |

(12)

The local safety performance targets proposed by Cyprus in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:

Cyprus

Cyprus

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from European Union Aviation Safety Agency level A to D

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation

Air navigation service provider concerned

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

Safety management objective

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Union-wide targets

Union-wide targets

(2024)

(2024)

CYATS

CYATS

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety risk management

D

D

D

D

D

D

Safety assurance

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

C

C

C

| (13) | The safety performance targets proposed by Cyprus for the air navigation service provider, namely CYPRUS Air Navigation Services (‘CYATS’), are in line with the Union-wide performance targets for each year of the reference period. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The safety performance targets proposed by Cyprus for the air navigation service provider, namely CYPRUS Air Navigation Services (‘CYATS’), are in line with the Union-wide performance targets for each year of the reference period.

| (14) | The Commission notes that the revised draft performance sets out measures for CYATS for the achievement of the local safety targets, such as the review and update of change management processes, guidelines on just culture policies, and additional staff for the purpose of supporting the realisation of safety objectives. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The Commission notes that the revised draft performance sets out measures for CYATS for the achievement of the local safety targets, such as the review and update of change management processes, guidelines on just culture policies, and additional staff for the purpose of supporting the realisation of safety objectives.

| (15) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals (12) to (14), and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 must be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of safety. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals (12) to (14), and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 must be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of safety.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

| (16) | Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Cyprus regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, that is on 2 June 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Cyprus regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, that is on 2 June 2021.

en route

en route

| (17) | In respect of the 2020 calendar year, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local environment performance targets for 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

In respect of the 2020 calendar year, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local environment performance targets for 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years.

| (18) | The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Cyprus and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:









  Cyprus | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 3,84 % | 3,84 % | 3,84 % |
| Reference values | 3,84 % | 3,84 % | 3,84 % |

(18)

The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Cyprus and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:

en route

Cyprus

Cyprus

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

Targets in the key performance area of environment,

en route

3,84 %

3,84 %

3,84 %

3,84 %

3,84 %

3,84 %

Reference values

3,84 %

3,84 %

3,84 %

| (19) | The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Cyprus are equal to the corresponding national reference values for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Cyprus are equal to the corresponding national reference values for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years.

| (20) | The Commission notes that Cyprus has presented, in the revised draft performance plan, measures for the achievement of the local environment performance targets, which mainly fulfil already existing legal requirements under Union law and include a performance-based navigation transition plan by 2024, the implementation of Free Route Airspace Cyprus (‘NICFRA’) Phase 1 in March 2023 between flight levels 205 and 660, as well as continued improvements of the route network within the Nicosia flight information region. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

The Commission notes that Cyprus has presented, in the revised draft performance plan, measures for the achievement of the local environment performance targets, which mainly fulfil already existing legal requirements under Union law and include a performance-based navigation transition plan by 2024, the implementation of Free Route Airspace Cyprus (‘NICFRA’) Phase 1 in March 2023 between flight levels 205 and 660, as well as continued improvements of the route network within the Nicosia flight information region.

| (21) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals (18), (19) and (20), the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of environment. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals (18), (19) and (20), the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of environment.

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

| (22) | The Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the proposed en route capacity targets included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight, were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Cyprus has proposed revised en route capacity targets as part of its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

The Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the proposed en route capacity targets included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight, were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Cyprus has proposed revised en route capacity targets as part of its revised draft performance plan.

en route

en route

en route

| (23) | In respect of the 2020 calendar year, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local capacity performance targets for 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(23)

In respect of the 2020 calendar year, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local capacity performance targets for 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years.

| (24) | The table below shows the initial RP3 draft en route capacity performance targets for the charging zone of Cyprus, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the revised performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan, and the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, that is on 2 June 2021.









  Cyprus | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial en route capacity targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,30 | 0,40 | 0,30 |
| Revised en route capacity targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,16 | 0,15 | 0,15 |
| Reference values | 0,16 | 0,15 | 0,15 |

(24)

The table below shows the initial RP3 draft en route capacity performance targets for the charging zone of Cyprus, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the revised performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan, and the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, that is on 2 June 2021.

en route

Cyprus

Cyprus

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial en route capacity targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

Initial en route capacity targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

0,30

0,30

0,40

0,40

0,30

0,30

Revised en route capacity targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

Revised en route

0,16

0,16

0,15

0,15

0,15

0,15

Reference values

0,16

0,15

0,15

| (25) | The consistency of the revised en route capacity targets submitted by Cyprus has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, by comparing those targets with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available on 2 June 2021. The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Cyprus are equal to the corresponding national reference values for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

The consistency of the revised en route capacity targets submitted by Cyprus has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, by comparing those targets with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available on 2 June 2021. The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Cyprus are equal to the corresponding national reference values for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years.

en route

| (26) | The Commission notes that Cyprus has presented in the revised draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets. Those measures include the recruitment of new air traffic controllers (‘ATCOs’) enabling an increase of the number of ATCO full-time equivalents in service at the area control centre. In particular, Cyprus reports in the revised draft performance plan that an agreement with staff representative bodies was reached in December 2021 in order to improve ATCO training and increase flexibility of ATCO working time. The Commission also observes that Cyprus has revised its initial planning of ATCOs in operations for the 2022 and 2023 calendar years, resulting in an additional 4 FTEs planned for those two calendar years. In addition, the revised draft performance plan foresees major investments in the upgrade of ATM infrastructure to enable the operation of additional air traffic control sectors, the implementation of an operational excellence program in cooperation with the Network Manager, airspace restructuring measures and measures to improve air traffic flow and capacity management. |
| --- | --- |

(26)

The Commission notes that Cyprus has presented in the revised draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets. Those measures include the recruitment of new air traffic controllers (‘ATCOs’) enabling an increase of the number of ATCO full-time equivalents in service at the area control centre. In particular, Cyprus reports in the revised draft performance plan that an agreement with staff representative bodies was reached in December 2021 in order to improve ATCO training and increase flexibility of ATCO working time. The Commission also observes that Cyprus has revised its initial planning of ATCOs in operations for the 2022 and 2023 calendar years, resulting in an additional 4 FTEs planned for those two calendar years. In addition, the revised draft performance plan foresees major investments in the upgrade of ATM infrastructure to enable the operation of additional air traffic control sectors, the implementation of an operational excellence program in cooperation with the Network Manager, airspace restructuring measures and measures to improve air traffic flow and capacity management.

en route

| (27) | The Commission observes that, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, Cyprus has presented additional relevant capacity enhancement measures which are also recommended in the Network Operations Plan of September 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(27)

The Commission observes that, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, Cyprus has presented additional relevant capacity enhancement measures which are also recommended in the Network Operations Plan of September 2021.

| (28) | Having regard to the foregoing observations, the Commission considers that Cyprus has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 2 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its capacity performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

Having regard to the foregoing observations, the Commission considers that Cyprus has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 2 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its capacity performance targets.

| (29) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals (24) to (28), the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of capacity. |
| --- | --- |

(29)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals (24) to (28), the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of capacity.

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

| (30) | The Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Cyprus has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets as part of its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(30)

The Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Cyprus has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets as part of its revised draft performance plan.

en route

en route

| (31) | The table below shows the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Cyprus, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022.













  En route charging zone of Cyprus | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 - 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 32,94 EUR | 26,61 EUR | 49,85 EUR | 34,14 EUR | 32,52 EUR | 32,26 EUR |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 32,94 EUR | 26,61 EUR | 49,85 EUR | 30,92 EUR | 29,35 EUR | 29,11 EUR |

(31)

The table below shows the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Cyprus, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022.

en route

En route charging zone of Cyprus

En route

2014 baseline value

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 - 2021

2020 - 2021

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

32,94 EUR

32,94 EUR

26,61 EUR

26,61 EUR

49,85 EUR

49,85 EUR

34,14 EUR

34,14 EUR

32,52 EUR

32,52 EUR

32,26 EUR

32,26 EUR

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Revised en route

en route

32,94 EUR

32,94 EUR

26,61 EUR

26,61 EUR

49,85 EUR

49,85 EUR

30,92 EUR

30,92 EUR

29,35 EUR

29,35 EUR

29,11 EUR

29,11 EUR

| (32) | The Commission observes that Cyprus has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the time period from 2022 to 2024, which results, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) lower by 9,7 % over those calendar years and lower by 6,6 % over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC reductions result both from the higher traffic forecast used in the revised draft performance plan for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years and from the downward revision of the determined costs expressed in real terms in 2017 prices for those calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(32)

The Commission observes that Cyprus has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the time period from 2022 to 2024, which results, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) lower by 9,7 % over those calendar years and lower by 6,6 % over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC reductions result both from the higher traffic forecast used in the revised draft performance plan for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years and from the downward revision of the determined costs expressed in real terms in 2017 prices for those calendar years.

| (33) | The changes to the traffic forecast for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years are presented in the table below. The Commission notes that the traffic forecast used in the revised draft performance plan is based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast.










  En route charging zone of Cyprus | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 1 789 | 2 083 | 2 169 |
| Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 1 837 | 2 129 | 2 235 |
| Difference | +2,7 % | +2,2 % | +3,0 % |

(33)

The changes to the traffic forecast for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years are presented in the table below. The Commission notes that the traffic forecast used in the revised draft performance plan is based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast.

En route charging zone of Cyprus

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

1 789

1 789

2 083

2 083

2 169

2 169

Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

en route

1 837

1 837

2 129

2 129

2 235

2 235

Difference

Difference

+2,7 %

+2,7 %

+2,2 %

+2,2 %

+3,0 %

+3,0 %

| (34) | The revised determined costs for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are shown in the table below.










  En route charging zone of Cyprus | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 61 M EUR | 68 M EUR | 70 M EUR |
| Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 57 M EUR | 62 M EUR | 65 M EUR |
| Difference | -7,0 % | -7,8 % | -7,0 % |

(34)

The revised determined costs for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are shown in the table below.

En route charging zone of Cyprus

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

61 M EUR

61 M EUR

68 M EUR

68 M EUR

70 M EUR

70 M EUR

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices

57 M EUR

57 M EUR

62 M EUR

62 M EUR

65 M EUR

65 M EUR

Difference

Difference

-7,0 %

-7,0 %

-7,8 %

-7,8 %

-7,0 %

-7,0 %

| (35) | The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Cyprus for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years , as outlined in the following table.










  En route charging zone of Cyprus | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 102,6


  (0,8 %) | 103,8


  (1,2 %) | 105,3


  (1,4 %) |
| Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 109,1


  (5,3 %) | 111,6


  (2,3 %) | 113,9


  (2,0 %) |

(35)

The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Cyprus for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years , as outlined in the following table.

En route charging zone of Cyprus

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

102,6

102,6

(0,8 %)

(0,8 %)

103,8

103,8

(1,2 %)

(1,2 %)

105,3

105,3

(1,4 %)

(1,4 %)

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the revised draft performance plan)

109,1

109,1

(5,3 %)

(5,3 %)

111,6

111,6

(2,3 %)

(2,3 %)

113,9

113,9

(2,0 %)

(2,0 %)

| (36) | The Commission observes that the determined costs in nominal terms of Cyprus for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years are lower than in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, despite an upward revision of the inflation forecast.










  En route charging zone of Cyprus | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 62 M EUR | 69 M EUR | 72 M EUR |
| Revised determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 60 M EUR | 67 M EUR | 71 M EUR |
| Difference | -3,1 % | -3,2 % | -2,1 % |

(36)

The Commission observes that the determined costs in nominal terms of Cyprus for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years are lower than in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, despite an upward revision of the inflation forecast.

En route charging zone of Cyprus

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

62 M EUR

62 M EUR

69 M EUR

69 M EUR

72 M EUR

72 M EUR

Revised determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in nominal terms

60 M EUR

60 M EUR

67 M EUR

67 M EUR

71 M EUR

71 M EUR

Difference

Difference

-3,1 %

-3,1 %

-3,2 %

-3,2 %

-2,1 %

-2,1 %

| (37) | The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Cyprus based on the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(37)

The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Cyprus based on the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (38) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +2,3 % over RP3 underperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this however constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +4,9 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plans submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(38)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +2,3 % over RP3 underperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this however constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +4,9 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plans submitted in 2021.

en route

| (39) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over RP2 and RP3 of -1,4 % outperforms the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes an improvement from the long-term DUC trend of -0,2 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(39)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over RP2 and RP3 of -1,4 % outperforms the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes an improvement from the long-term DUC trend of -0,2 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (40) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the baseline value for the DUC of EUR 26,61 of Cyprus, expressed in 2017 prices, is 4,7 % lower than the average baseline value of EUR 27,91, expressed in 2017 prices, of the relevant comparator group. |
| --- | --- |

(40)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the baseline value for the DUC of EUR 26,61 of Cyprus, expressed in 2017 prices, is 4,7 % lower than the average baseline value of EUR 27,91, expressed in 2017 prices, of the relevant comparator group.

| (41) | As specified in recital (39), Cyprus’s revised cost-efficiency targets result in a long-term DUC trend which outperforms the corresponding Union-wide trend. Furthermore, Cyprus’s revised DUC for 2024 is lower than the baseline value for 2014, which demonstrates a reduction of the DUC over RP2 and RP3. With reference to recital (40), Cyprus demonstrates a good cost-efficiency performance in respect of the baseline value for 2019, which is lower than the corresponding comparator group average. Finally, the Commission notes that Cyprus has reduced, in its revised draft performance plan, the determined costs for RP3 both in real and nominal terms, whilst planning to serve additional traffic on the basis of the updated traffic forecast for RP3. Therefore, the Commission considers that the deviation from the Union-wide RP3 DUC trend referred to in recital (38) does not preclude the establishment of consistency with the Union-wide cost-efficiency performance targets in respect of Cyprus. |
| --- | --- |

(41)

As specified in recital (39), Cyprus’s revised cost-efficiency targets result in a long-term DUC trend which outperforms the corresponding Union-wide trend. Furthermore, Cyprus’s revised DUC for 2024 is lower than the baseline value for 2014, which demonstrates a reduction of the DUC over RP2 and RP3. With reference to recital (40), Cyprus demonstrates a good cost-efficiency performance in respect of the baseline value for 2019, which is lower than the corresponding comparator group average. Finally, the Commission notes that Cyprus has reduced, in its revised draft performance plan, the determined costs for RP3 both in real and nominal terms, whilst planning to serve additional traffic on the basis of the updated traffic forecast for RP3. Therefore, the Commission considers that the deviation from the Union-wide RP3 DUC trend referred to in recital (38) does not preclude the establishment of consistency with the Union-wide cost-efficiency performance targets in respect of Cyprus.

| (42) | The Commission therefore considers that Cyprus has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its cost-efficiency performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(42)

The Commission therefore considers that Cyprus has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its cost-efficiency performance targets.

| (43) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals (31) to (42), the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency. |
| --- | --- |

(43)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals (31) to (42), the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

CONCLUSIONS

| (44) | In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission has found that the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, |
| --- | --- |

(44)

In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission has found that the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Cyprus, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, and listed in the Annex to this Decision, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Cyprus.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2022.

For the Commission

Adina-Ioana VĂLEAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2019, p. 1.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 of 29 May 2019 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period starting on 1 January 2020 and ending on 31 December 2024 (OJ L 144, 3.6.2019, p. 49).

3

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 of 3 November 2020 on exceptional measures for the third reference period (2020-2024) of the single European sky performance and charging scheme due to COVID-19 pandemic (OJ L 366, 4.11.2020, p. 7).

4

(5)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 of 2 June 2021 setting revised Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period (2020-2024) and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (OJ L 195, 3.6.2021, p. 3).

5

(6)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 of 13 April 2022 on the inconsistency of certain performance targets contained in the draft national and functional airspace block performance plans submitted by Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (OJ L 135, 12.5.2022, p. 4).

6

---

ANNEX

Performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Cyprus pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY

Effectiveness of safety management

| Cyprus | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
| --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| CYATS | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | C |
| Safety risk management | D | D | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | C |
| Safety promotion | C | C | C |
| Safety culture | C | C | C |

Cyprus

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

2022

2023

2024

CYATS

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

C

Safety risk management

D

D

D

Safety assurance

C

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT

Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

| Cyprus | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 3,84 % | 3,84 % | 3,84 % |

Cyprus

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

3,84 %

3,84 %

3,84 %

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY

Average en route ATFM delay in minutes per flight

| Cyprus | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revised en route capacity targets, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,16 | 0,15 | 0,15 |

Cyprus

2022

2023

2024

Revised en route capacity targets, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

0,16

0,15

0,15

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

Determined unit cost for en route air navigation services

| En route charging zone of Cyprus | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 -2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 32,94 EUR | 26,61 EUR | 49,85 EUR | 30,92 EUR | 29,35 EUR | 29,11 EUR |

En route charging zone of Cyprus

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 -2021

2022

2023

2024

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

32,94 EUR

26,61 EUR

49,85 EUR

30,92 EUR

29,35 EUR

29,11 EUR

---

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/116 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/116

---

COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2022/2423

of 5 December 2022

on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

(notified under document C(2022) 8716)

(Only the Swedish text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 11(3), point (c) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 of 11 February 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 (2), and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’) which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’) which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned.

| (2) | Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). Since those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). Since those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic.

3

| (3) | In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On that basis, in October 2021, Member States submitted to the Commission draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On that basis, in October 2021, Member States submitted to the Commission draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3.

4

5

| (4) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of Sweden are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of Sweden are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets.

6

en route

| (5) | In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States, including Sweden, have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States, including Sweden, have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

| (6) | On 13 July 2022, Sweden submitted a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’) for assessment to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

On 13 July 2022, Sweden submitted a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’) for assessment to the Commission.

| (7) | The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan.

| (8) | In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation.

| (9) | The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast, published in June 2022, takes account of the change in circumstances referred to in recital 5. On the basis of that forecast, the Commission notes that Sweden continues to face a significantly deteriorated traffic outlook for the remainder of RP3 as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. As those changes in circumstances considerably impact the performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan, they should be taken into account in the assessment of the local performance targets included therein. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast, published in June 2022, takes account of the change in circumstances referred to in recital 5. On the basis of that forecast, the Commission notes that Sweden continues to face a significantly deteriorated traffic outlook for the remainder of RP3 as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. As those changes in circumstances considerably impact the performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan, they should be taken into account in the assessment of the local performance targets included therein.

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

| (10) | Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Sweden regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) based on the criterion laid down in point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Sweden regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) based on the criterion laid down in point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (11) | The local safety performance targets proposed by Sweden for the main air navigation service provider, namely LFV, in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:











  Sweden | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from European Union Aviation Safety Agency level A to D |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Union-wide targets (2024) |
| LFV | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | C | C |
| Safety risk management | D | D | D | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | C | C |
| Safety promotion | C | C | C | C |
| Safety culture | C | C | C | C |

(11)

The local safety performance targets proposed by Sweden for the main air navigation service provider, namely LFV, in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:

Sweden

Sweden

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from European Union Aviation Safety Agency level A to D

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation

Air navigation service provider concerned

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

Safety management objective

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Union-wide targets (2024)

Union-wide targets (2024)

LFV

LFV

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety risk management

D

D

D

D

D

D

Safety assurance

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

C

C

C

| (12) | The safety performance targets proposed by Sweden for LFV are in line with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The safety performance targets proposed by Sweden for LFV are in line with the Union-wide performance targets.

| (13) | The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan does not set out specific measures for LFV for the achievement of the local safety targets. However, the plan presents general measures such as the monitoring and application of mitigating measures to manage specific risks, and the assessment via the safety management system of changes made to the functional system. Having regard to the assessment of the performance review body, the Commission notes that LFV is reported to have already achieved the level of the Union-wide targets and therefore Sweden has not set out additional measures for LFV for the achievement of those targets. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan does not set out specific measures for LFV for the achievement of the local safety targets. However, the plan presents general measures such as the monitoring and application of mitigating measures to manage specific risks, and the assessment via the safety management system of changes made to the functional system. Having regard to the assessment of the performance review body, the Commission notes that LFV is reported to have already achieved the level of the Union-wide targets and therefore Sweden has not set out additional measures for LFV for the achievement of those targets.

| (14) | The safety targets proposed by Sweden for the providers of terminal air navigation services in the scope of the revised draft performance plan, namely ACR, SDATS, and AFAB, are also in line with the Union-wide performance targets. The Commission further notes that Sweden has set out measures for those ANSPs for the achievement of their safety performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The safety targets proposed by Sweden for the providers of terminal air navigation services in the scope of the revised draft performance plan, namely ACR, SDATS, and AFAB, are also in line with the Union-wide performance targets. The Commission further notes that Sweden has set out measures for those ANSPs for the achievement of their safety performance targets.

| (15) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 11, 12, 13 and 14, and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 must be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of safety. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 11, 12, 13 and 14, and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 must be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of safety.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

| (16) | Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Sweden regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, that is on 2 June 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Sweden regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, that is on 2 June 2021.

en route

en route

| (17) | In respect of the 2020 calendar year, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local environment performance targets for 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in their revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

In respect of the 2020 calendar year, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local environment performance targets for 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in their revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years.

| (18) | The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Sweden and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:









  Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 1,05  % | 1,05  % | 1,05  % |
| Reference values | 1,05  % | 1,05  % | 1,05  % |

(18)

The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Sweden and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:

en route

Sweden

Sweden

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

Targets in the key performance area of environment,

en route

1,05  %

1,05  %

1,05  %

1,05  %

1,05  %

1,05  %

Reference values

1,05  %

1,05  %

1,05  %

| (19) | The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Sweden are equal to the corresponding national reference values for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Sweden are equal to the corresponding national reference values for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years.

| (20) | The Commission notes that Sweden has presented in the revised draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local environment performance targets, which include the planned implementation of cross-border free route airspace with Poland. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

The Commission notes that Sweden has presented in the revised draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local environment performance targets, which include the planned implementation of cross-border free route airspace with Poland.

| (21) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 18, 19 and 20, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of environment. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 18, 19 and 20, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of environment.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

| (22) | Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Sweden regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan have been compared with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, that is on 2 June 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Sweden regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan have been compared with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, that is on 2 June 2021.

en route

| (23) | In respect of the 2020 calendar year, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local capacity performance targets for 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in their revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(23)

In respect of the 2020 calendar year, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local capacity performance targets for 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in their revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years.

| (24) | The en route capacity targets proposed by Sweden for RP3, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight, as well as the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan, are as follows:









  Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,07 | 0,08 | 0,08 |
| Reference values | 0,07 | 0,08 | 0,08 |

(24)

The en route capacity targets proposed by Sweden for RP3, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight, as well as the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan, are as follows:

en route

Sweden

Sweden

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

Targets in the key performance area of capacity

0,07

0,07

0,08

0,08

0,08

0,08

Reference values

0,07

0,08

0,08

| (25) | The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Sweden are equal to the corresponding national reference values for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Sweden are equal to the corresponding national reference values for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years.

| (26) | The Commission notes that Sweden has presented, in the revised draft performance plan, measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets. Those measures include the implementation of the Swedish Airspace Project (‘SWEA’) and an increase in air traffic controller (‘ATCO’) full-time equivalents in RP3 and beyond to accommodate future traffic demand, including for the purpose of anticipating planned ATCO retirements. The Commission notes that, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the planned number of ATCO full-time equivalents in operations in the area control centres of Stockholm and Malmö has been revised downwards due to the change in circumstances outlined in recitals 5 and 9. |
| --- | --- |

(26)

The Commission notes that Sweden has presented, in the revised draft performance plan, measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets. Those measures include the implementation of the Swedish Airspace Project (‘SWEA’) and an increase in air traffic controller (‘ATCO’) full-time equivalents in RP3 and beyond to accommodate future traffic demand, including for the purpose of anticipating planned ATCO retirements. The Commission notes that, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the planned number of ATCO full-time equivalents in operations in the area control centres of Stockholm and Malmö has been revised downwards due to the change in circumstances outlined in recitals 5 and 9.

en route

| (27) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 24, 25 and 26, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of capacity. |
| --- | --- |

(27)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 24, 25 and 26, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of capacity.

Review of capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

| (28) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Implementing Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(b) of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation. Those targets were not found to raise concerns in respect of Sweden. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Implementing Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(b) of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation. Those targets were not found to raise concerns in respect of Sweden.

en route

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

| (29) | The Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Sweden submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Sweden has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets in its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(29)

The Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Sweden submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Sweden has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets in its revised draft performance plan.

en route

en route

| (30) | The table below sets out the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Sweden, as included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised draft performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan.













  En route charging zone of Sweden | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 -2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 522,30 SEK | 567,11 SEK | 1 361,88 SEK | 676,24 SEK | 605,51 SEK | 570,87 SEK |
| 54,22 EUR | 58,87 EUR | 141,38 EUR | 70,20 EUR | 62,86 EUR | 59,26 EUR |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 604,02 SEK | 537,87 SEK | 1 361,88 SEK | 774,65 SEK | 650,98 SEK | 587,62 SEK |
| 62,70 EUR | 55,84 EUR | 141,38 EUR | 80,42 EUR | 67,58 EUR | 61,00 EUR |

(30)

The table below sets out the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Sweden, as included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised draft performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan.

en route

En route charging zone of Sweden

En route

2014 baseline value

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 -2021

2020 -2021

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

522,30 SEK

522,30 SEK

567,11 SEK

567,11 SEK

1 361,88 SEK

1 361,88 SEK

676,24 SEK

676,24 SEK

605,51 SEK

605,51 SEK

570,87 SEK

570,87 SEK

54,22 EUR

54,22 EUR

58,87 EUR

58,87 EUR

141,38 EUR

141,38 EUR

70,20 EUR

70,20 EUR

62,86 EUR

62,86 EUR

59,26 EUR

59,26 EUR

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Revised en route

en route

604,02 SEK

604,02 SEK

537,87 SEK

537,87 SEK

1 361,88 SEK

1 361,88 SEK

774,65 SEK

774,65 SEK

650,98 SEK

650,98 SEK

587,62 SEK

587,62 SEK

62,70 EUR

55,84 EUR

141,38 EUR

80,42 EUR

67,58 EUR

61,00 EUR

| (31) | The Commission observes that Sweden has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for 2022, 2023 and 2024, which results, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) higher by 8,2 % over those calendar years and higher by 7,1 % over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC increases result from the significant deterioration in the traffic forecast, which has been caused by the reduction of air traffic in Sweden’s airspace as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as referred to in recitals 5 and 9. The lower number of forecasted service units for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years has however been partly offset by Sweden through a reduction of determined costs. |
| --- | --- |

(31)

The Commission observes that Sweden has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for 2022, 2023 and 2024, which results, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) higher by 8,2 % over those calendar years and higher by 7,1 % over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC increases result from the significant deterioration in the traffic forecast, which has been caused by the reduction of air traffic in Sweden’s airspace as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as referred to in recitals 5 and 9. The lower number of forecasted service units for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years has however been partly offset by Sweden through a reduction of determined costs.

| (32) | Furthermore, Sweden has applied an upward adjustment to the baseline value for 2014, whilst the baseline value for 2019 has been adjusted downwards. Sweden explains in the revised draft performance plan that the baseline values for 2014 and 2019 have been adjusted mainly in order to account for the impact of significant one-off amounts related to the actual pension costs recorded for those calendar years and which affect comparability with the determined costs of RP3. Furthermore, Sweden has applied two further adjustments to the baseline value for 2019, which have been justified by changes in the scope of the en route charging zone between the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 and by a change in the method applied by Sweden for deducting public funding received by the ANSP from the route charges paid by users. |
| --- | --- |

(32)

Furthermore, Sweden has applied an upward adjustment to the baseline value for 2014, whilst the baseline value for 2019 has been adjusted downwards. Sweden explains in the revised draft performance plan that the baseline values for 2014 and 2019 have been adjusted mainly in order to account for the impact of significant one-off amounts related to the actual pension costs recorded for those calendar years and which affect comparability with the determined costs of RP3. Furthermore, Sweden has applied two further adjustments to the baseline value for 2019, which have been justified by changes in the scope of the en route charging zone between the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 and by a change in the method applied by Sweden for deducting public funding received by the ANSP from the route charges paid by users.

en route

| (33) | The Commission notes that the traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan are based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast. The en route service units forecasted for the charging zone for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, in comparison with the figures included in the draft performance plan, are presented in the table below.










  En route charging zone of Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 3 173 | 3 637 | 3 906 |
| Updated traffic forecast (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 2 724 | 3 248 | 3 367 |
| Difference | -14,2  % | -10,7  % | -13,8  % |

(33)

The Commission notes that the traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan are based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast. The en route service units forecasted for the charging zone for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, in comparison with the figures included in the draft performance plan, are presented in the table below.

en route

En route charging zone of Sweden

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

3 173

3 173

3 637

3 637

3 906

3 906

Updated traffic forecast (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Updated traffic forecast

en route

2 724

2 724

3 248

3 248

3 367

3 367

Difference

Difference

-14,2  %

-14,2  %

-10,7  %

-10,7  %

-13,8  %

-13,8  %

| (34) | Compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the annual reductions in the number of service units for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years are in the approximate range of -11 % to -14 %. Accordingly, the en route service units for Sweden are expected to remain, in 2024, 11,1 % below their pre-pandemic level (calendar year 2019), whereas they were previously foreseen to exceed the pre-pandemic level by 3,1 % in the STATFOR base traffic forecast of October 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(34)

Compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the annual reductions in the number of service units for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years are in the approximate range of -11 % to -14 %. Accordingly, the en route service units for Sweden are expected to remain, in 2024, 11,1 % below their pre-pandemic level (calendar year 2019), whereas they were previously foreseen to exceed the pre-pandemic level by 3,1 % in the STATFOR base traffic forecast of October 2021.

en route

| (35) | However, as displayed in the table below, the flight movements in Swedish airspace operated under instrument flight rules (IFR) are not foreseen to decrease at the same rate as the en route service units. This discrepancy is due to the significant reduction of overflights, which on average generate proportionally higher numbers of en route service units than flights landing and departing from airports in Sweden.










  En route charging zone of Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of IFR movements | 685 | 771 | 824 |
| Updated traffic forecast (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of IFR movements | 626 | 751 | 773 |
| Difference | -8,6  % | -2,6  % | -6,2  % |

(35)

However, as displayed in the table below, the flight movements in Swedish airspace operated under instrument flight rules (IFR) are not foreseen to decrease at the same rate as the en route service units. This discrepancy is due to the significant reduction of overflights, which on average generate proportionally higher numbers of en route service units than flights landing and departing from airports in Sweden.

en route

en route

En route charging zone of Sweden

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of IFR movements

Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of IFR movements

685

685

771

771

824

824

Updated traffic forecast (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of IFR movements

Updated traffic forecast

thousands of IFR movements

626

626

751

751

773

773

Difference

Difference

-8,6  %

-8,6  %

-2,6  %

-2,6  %

-6,2  %

-6,2  %

| (36) | The Commission hence notes that the workload of the ANSP, which is driven by the controlled flight movements, is not foreseen to diminish in correlation with the revenue reduction which stems from the lower number of en route service units. |
| --- | --- |

(36)

The Commission hence notes that the workload of the ANSP, which is driven by the controlled flight movements, is not foreseen to diminish in correlation with the revenue reduction which stems from the lower number of en route service units.

en route

| (37) | The revised determined costs for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are shown in the table below. The Commission notes that Sweden has revised downwards the determined costs in real terms for each of those calendar years.










  En route charging zone of Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 2 146 M SEK | 2 202 M SEK | 2 230 M SEK |
| Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the revised draft performance plan) | 2 110 M SEK | 2 114 M SEK | 1 979 M SEK |
| Difference | -1,7  % | -4,0  % | -11,3  % |

(37)

The revised determined costs for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are shown in the table below. The Commission notes that Sweden has revised downwards the determined costs in real terms for each of those calendar years.

En route charging zone of Sweden

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

2 146 M SEK

2 146 M SEK

2 202 M SEK

2 202 M SEK

2 230 M SEK

2 230 M SEK

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices

2 110 M SEK

2 110 M SEK

2 114 M SEK

2 114 M SEK

1 979 M SEK

1 979 M SEK

Difference

Difference

-1,7  %

-1,7  %

-4,0  %

-4,0  %

-11,3  %

-11,3  %

| (38) | The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Sweden for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, as outlined in the following table.










  En route charging zone of Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 107,4


  (1,3  %) | 109,1


  (1,6  %) | 111,1


  (1,8  %) |
| Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the revised draft performance plan) | 112,4


  (4,8  %) | 114,9


  (2,2  %) | 116,9


  (1,7  %) |

(38)

The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Sweden for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, as outlined in the following table.

En route charging zone of Sweden

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

107,4

107,4

(1,3  %)

(1,3  %)

109,1

109,1

(1,6  %)

(1,6  %)

111,1

111,1

(1,8  %)

(1,8  %)

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised inflation index

112,4

112,4

(4,8  %)

(4,8  %)

114,9

114,9

(2,2  %)

(2,2  %)

116,9

116,9

(1,7  %)

(1,7  %)

| (39) | Due to the update of the inflation forecast, the revised determined costs in nominal terms for the 2022 calendar year have increased while those for 2023 have remained unchanged. For the 2024 calendar year, the nominal determined costs are lower than in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.










  En route charging zone of Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in nominal terms (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 2 269 M SEK | 2 359 M SEK | 2 424 M SEK |
| Revised determined costs in nominal terms (included in the revised draft performance plan) | 2 310 M SEK | 2 359 M SEK | 2 234 M SEK |
| Difference | +1,8  % | 0,0  % | -7,8  % |

(39)

Due to the update of the inflation forecast, the revised determined costs in nominal terms for the 2022 calendar year have increased while those for 2023 have remained unchanged. For the 2024 calendar year, the nominal determined costs are lower than in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

En route charging zone of Sweden

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

2 269 M SEK

2 269 M SEK

2 359 M SEK

2 359 M SEK

2 424 M SEK

2 424 M SEK

Revised determined costs in nominal terms (included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in nominal terms

2 310 M SEK

2 310 M SEK

2 359 M SEK

2 359 M SEK

2 234 M SEK

2 234 M SEK

Difference

Difference

+1,8  %

+1,8  %

0,0  %

0,0  %

-7,8  %

-7,8  %

| (40) | The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Sweden based on the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(40)

The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Sweden based on the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (41) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +2,2 % over RP3 underperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The adjusted baseline value for 2019 set by Sweden, referred to in recital 32, impacts negatively the calculated DUC trend. The DUC trend of Sweden has deteriorated compared with the DUC trend of +0,2 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(41)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +2,2 % over RP3 underperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The adjusted baseline value for 2019 set by Sweden, referred to in recital 32, impacts negatively the calculated DUC trend. The DUC trend of Sweden has deteriorated compared with the DUC trend of +0,2 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (42) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over RP2 and RP3 of -0,3 % underperforms the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The adjusted baseline value for 2014 set by Sweden, referred to in recital 32, impacts positively the calculated long-term DUC trend. The long-term DUC trend of Sweden has improved compared with the long-term DUC trend of +1,0 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(42)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over RP2 and RP3 of -0,3 % underperforms the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The adjusted baseline value for 2014 set by Sweden, referred to in recital 32, impacts positively the calculated long-term DUC trend. The long-term DUC trend of Sweden has improved compared with the long-term DUC trend of +1,0 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (43) | As noted in recitals 33 and 34, the Commission recalls that Sweden’s service unit forecast for RP3 has been revised significantly downwards as a consequence of the traffic changes resulting from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. It is therefore necessary and appropriate to examine, for the purpose of the assessment criteria examined in recitals 41 and 42, whether Sweden would meet the Union-wide cost-efficiency trends in the absence of the severe traffic reduction for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years which is due to the changed circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

(43)

As noted in recitals 33 and 34, the Commission recalls that Sweden’s service unit forecast for RP3 has been revised significantly downwards as a consequence of the traffic changes resulting from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. It is therefore necessary and appropriate to examine, for the purpose of the assessment criteria examined in recitals 41 and 42, whether Sweden would meet the Union-wide cost-efficiency trends in the absence of the severe traffic reduction for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years which is due to the changed circumstances.

| (44) | The Commission has therefore recalculated Sweden’s DUC trend over RP3 and Sweden’s long-term DUC trend over RP2 and RP3 by making use of the Eurocontrol STATFOR base traffic forecast of October 2021. This recalculation results, for the en route charging zone of Sweden, in an adjusted DUC trend of -1,5 % over RP3 and in an adjusted long-term DUC trend of -1,9 %. Both of these adjusted trends are below the corresponding Union-wide DUC trends of +1,0 % and -1,3 % respectively. Hence, the Commission concludes that Sweden fulfils the assessment criteria examined in recitals 41 and 42 in the absence of the changes in traffic caused by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

(44)

The Commission has therefore recalculated Sweden’s DUC trend over RP3 and Sweden’s long-term DUC trend over RP2 and RP3 by making use of the Eurocontrol STATFOR base traffic forecast of October 2021. This recalculation results, for the en route charging zone of Sweden, in an adjusted DUC trend of -1,5 % over RP3 and in an adjusted long-term DUC trend of -1,9 %. Both of these adjusted trends are below the corresponding Union-wide DUC trends of +1,0 % and -1,3 % respectively. Hence, the Commission concludes that Sweden fulfils the assessment criteria examined in recitals 41 and 42 in the absence of the changes in traffic caused by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.

en route

| (45) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the baseline value for the DUC at the level of the charging zone of Sweden of EUR 55,84 (expressed in 2017 prices) is 24,8 % higher than the average baseline value of 44,74 EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group. |
| --- | --- |

(45)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the baseline value for the DUC at the level of the charging zone of Sweden of EUR 55,84 (expressed in 2017 prices) is 24,8 % higher than the average baseline value of 44,74 EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group.

| (46) | The Commission acknowledges that the revised cost-efficiency targets for the charging zone of Sweden are higher than the initial targets included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. However, this deterioration is entirely due to the significantly lower traffic assumptions. When excluding the negative impact of the traffic changes resulting from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, it is clear that Sweden meets both the Union-wide DUC trend and the Union-wide long-term DUC trend. |
| --- | --- |

(46)

The Commission acknowledges that the revised cost-efficiency targets for the charging zone of Sweden are higher than the initial targets included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. However, this deterioration is entirely due to the significantly lower traffic assumptions. When excluding the negative impact of the traffic changes resulting from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, it is clear that Sweden meets both the Union-wide DUC trend and the Union-wide long-term DUC trend.

| (47) | Furthermore, as noted in recital 37, the Commission recalls that Sweden has reduced its determined costs in real terms for the remainder of RP3 in response to the deteriorated traffic assumptions. The Commission observes that those cost containment measures are, overall, commensurate with the lower number of IFR movements forecasted for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, as presented in recital 35. |
| --- | --- |

(47)

Furthermore, as noted in recital 37, the Commission recalls that Sweden has reduced its determined costs in real terms for the remainder of RP3 in response to the deteriorated traffic assumptions. The Commission observes that those cost containment measures are, overall, commensurate with the lower number of IFR movements forecasted for the 2022, 2023 and 2024 calendar years, as presented in recital 35.

| (48) | On balance, the Commission therefore considers that Sweden has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its local cost-efficiency performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(48)

On balance, the Commission therefore considers that Sweden has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its local cost-efficiency performance targets.

| (49) | On the basis of the findings in recitals 30 to 48, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency. |
| --- | --- |

(49)

On the basis of the findings in recitals 30 to 48, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency.

Review of revised cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of revised cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

| (50) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Implementing Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(50)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Implementing Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation.

en route

| (51) | In of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal cost-efficiency targets proposed by Sweden in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Sweden should further justify those targets or revise them downwards. |
| --- | --- |

(51)

In of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal cost-efficiency targets proposed by Sweden in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Sweden should further justify those targets or revise them downwards.

| (52) | The Commission notes that Sweden has duly justified and substantiated, in the revised draft performance plan, its terminal cost efficiency targets, including by referring to the reduced number of flights in the terminal charging zone as compared to RP2 and the strong impact of air traffic controller retirements on the terminal cost base during RP3. The Commission does not have any further observations on the terminal cost-efficiency targets included in the revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(52)

The Commission notes that Sweden has duly justified and substantiated, in the revised draft performance plan, its terminal cost efficiency targets, including by referring to the reduced number of flights in the terminal charging zone as compared to RP2 and the strong impact of air traffic controller retirements on the terminal cost base during RP3. The Commission does not have any further observations on the terminal cost-efficiency targets included in the revised draft performance plan.

CONCLUSIONS

CONCLUSIONS

| (53) | In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission has found that the performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, |
| --- | --- |

(53)

In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission has found that the performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The performance targets, included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, and listed in the Annex to this Decision, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2022.

For the Commission

Adina VĂLEAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2019, p. 1.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 of 29 May 2019 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period starting on 1 January 2020 and ending on 31 December 2024 (OJ L 144, 3.6.2019, p. 49).

3

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 of 3 November 2020 on exceptional measures for the third reference period (2020-2024) of the single European sky performance and charging scheme due to the COVID-19 pandemic (OJ L 366, 4.11.2020, p. 7).

4

(5)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 of 2 June 2021 setting revised Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period (2020-2024) and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (OJ L 195, 3.6.2021, p. 3).

5

(6)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 of 13 April 2022 on the inconsistency of certain performance targets contained in the draft national and functional airspace block performance plans submitted by Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (OJ L 135, 12.5.2022, p. 4).

6

---

ANNEX

Performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY

Effectiveness of safety management

| Sweden | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
| --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| LFV | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | C |
| Safety risk management | D | D | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | C |
| Safety promotion | C | C | C |
| Safety culture | C | C | C |

Sweden

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

2022

2023

2024

LFV

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

C

Safety risk management

D

D

D

Safety assurance

C

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT

Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

| Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 1,05  % | 1,05  % | 1,05  % |

Sweden

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

1,05  %

1,05  %

1,05  %

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY

Average en route ATFM delay in minutes per flight

| Sweden | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,07 | 0,08 | 0,08 |

Sweden

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

0,07

0,08

0,08

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

Determined unit cost for en route air navigation services

| En route charging zone of Sweden | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 -2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 604,02 SEK | 537,87 SEK | 1 361,88 SEK | 774,65 SEK | 650,98 SEK | 587,62 SEK |
| 62,70 EUR | 55,84 EUR | 141,38 EUR | 80,42 EUR | 67,58 EUR | 61,00 EUR |

En route charging zone of Sweden

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 -2021

2022

2023

2024

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

604,02 SEK

537,87 SEK

1 361,88 SEK

774,65 SEK

650,98 SEK

587,62 SEK

62,70 EUR

55,84 EUR

141,38 EUR

80,42 EUR

67,58 EUR

61,00 EUR

---

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/126 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/126

---

COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2022/2424

of 5 December 2022

on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

(notified under document C(2022) 8740)

(Only the Romanian text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the ‘Framework Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 11(3) point (c), thereof,

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 of 11 February 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 (2), and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at functional airspace blocks level (‘FAB’), which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets are to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at functional airspace blocks level (‘FAB’), which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets are to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned.

| (2) | Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). Since those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). Since those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic.

3

| (3) | In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On that basis, in October 2021, Member States submitted to the Commission draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On that basis, in October 2021, Member States submitted to the Commission draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3.

4

5

| (4) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of Romania are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of Romania are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets.

6

en route

| (5) | In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

| (6) | On 13 July 2022, Romania submitted to the Commission a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’). |
| --- | --- |

(6)

On 13 July 2022, Romania submitted to the Commission a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’).

| (7) | The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its assessment of the revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its assessment of the revised draft performance plan.

| (8) | In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission, taking account of local circumstances, has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Regulation. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission, taking account of local circumstances, has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Regulation. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (9) | The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast published in June 2022 takes account of the change in circumstances with respect to air traffic in European airspace. On the basis of that forecast, the Commission notes that Romania is expected to have additional flight movements in its airspace during the rest of RP3 because of shifts in air traffic flows resulting from Russia’s war in Ukraine. However, that situation does not significantly change the operational conditions for air navigation services in Romania and does not have a detrimental impact on its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast published in June 2022 takes account of the change in circumstances with respect to air traffic in European airspace. On the basis of that forecast, the Commission notes that Romania is expected to have additional flight movements in its airspace during the rest of RP3 because of shifts in air traffic flows resulting from Russia’s war in Ukraine. However, that situation does not significantly change the operational conditions for air navigation services in Romania and does not have a detrimental impact on its revised draft performance plan.

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

| (10) | Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Romania regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) in accordance with point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Romania regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) in accordance with point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (11) | The local safety performance targets proposed by Romania in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:











  Romania | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from European Union Aviation Safety Agency level A to D |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Union-wide targets (2024) |
| ROMATSA | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | C | C |
| | Safety risk management | C | C | D | D |
| | Safety assurance | C | C | C | C |
| | Safety promotion | C | C | C | C |
| | Safety culture | C | C | C | C |

(11)

The local safety performance targets proposed by Romania in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:

Romania

Romania

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from European Union Aviation Safety Agency level A to D

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation,

Air navigation service provider concerned

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

Safety management objective

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Union-wide targets (2024)

Union-wide targets (2024)

ROMATSA

ROMATSA

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety risk management

C

C

D

D

D

D

Safety assurance

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

C

C

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

C

C

C

| (12) | The safety performance targets proposed by Romania for the air navigation service provider, namely ROMATSA, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The safety performance targets proposed by Romania for the air navigation service provider, namely ROMATSA, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

| (13) | The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania sets out measures for ROMATSA for the achievement of the local safety targets, including the implementation of internal safety monitoring procedures and processes for continuous improvement of the effectiveness of safety management. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania sets out measures for ROMATSA for the achievement of the local safety targets, including the implementation of internal safety monitoring procedures and processes for continuous improvement of the effectiveness of safety management.

| (14) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 11, 12 and 13 and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 are to be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets in the key performance area of safety included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 11, 12 and 13 and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 are to be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets in the key performance area of safety included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

| (15) | Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Romania regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed in accordance with point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available on 2 June 2021, the date of adoption of the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Romania regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed in accordance with point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available on 2 June 2021, the date of adoption of the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3.

en route

en route

| (16) | In respect of the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, in so far as the period for the application of that target had expired and its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, it is not possible to modify retroactively, in the revised draft performance plans, the local environment performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

In respect of the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, in so far as the period for the application of that target had expired and its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, it is not possible to modify retroactively, in the revised draft performance plans, the local environment performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (17) | The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Romania and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:









  Romania | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 2,05  % | 2,05  % | 2,05  % |
| Reference values | 2,05  % | 2,05  % | 2,05  % |

(17)

The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Romania and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:

en route

Romania

Romania

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

Targets in the key performance area of environment,

en route

2,05  %

2,05  %

2,05  %

2,05  %

2,05  %

2,05  %

Reference values

2,05  %

2,05  %

2,05  %

| (18) | The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Romania are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Romania are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (19) | The Commission notes that, in its revised draft performance plan, Romania has presented measures for the achievement of the local environment targets which include its participation in the South East Europe Free Route Airspace initiative, increased cross-border cooperation, a transition plan for the implementation of performance-based navigation, and changes in the configuration of operational sectors to improve airspace utilisation. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The Commission notes that, in its revised draft performance plan, Romania has presented measures for the achievement of the local environment targets which include its participation in the South East Europe Free Route Airspace initiative, increased cross-border cooperation, a transition plan for the implementation of performance-based navigation, and changes in the configuration of operational sectors to improve airspace utilisation.

| (20) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 17, 18 and 19, the targets in the key performance area of environment included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 17, 18 and 19, the targets in the key performance area of environment included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

| (21) | Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Romania regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight has been assessed in accordance with point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania have been compared with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available on 2 June 2021, the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Romania regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight has been assessed in accordance with point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania have been compared with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available on 2 June 2021, the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3.

en route

| (22) | In respect of the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 in so far as the period for the application of that target had expired and its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, it is not possible to modify retroactively, in the revised draft performance plans, the local capacity performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

In respect of the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 in so far as the period for the application of that target had expired and its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, it is not possible to modify retroactively, in the revised draft performance plans, the local capacity performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (23) | The en route capacity targets proposed by Romania for RP3, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight, as well as the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan, are as follows:









  Romania | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,04 | 0,04 | 0,04 |
| Reference values | 0,04 | 0,04 | 0,04 |

(23)

The en route capacity targets proposed by Romania for RP3, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight, as well as the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan, are as follows:

en route

Romania

Romania

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

Targets in the key performance area of capacity

0,04

0,04

0,04

0,04

0,04

0,04

Reference values

0,04

0,04

0,04

| (24) | The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Romania are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Romania are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (25) | The Commission notes that Romania has presented measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets in the revised draft performance plan. Those measures include the implementation of a new air traffic management system, airspace configuration focusing on the implementation of free route airspace and flexible use of airspace concepts, and the recruitment and training of new air traffic controllers. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

The Commission notes that Romania has presented measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets in the revised draft performance plan. Those measures include the implementation of a new air traffic management system, airspace configuration focusing on the implementation of free route airspace and flexible use of airspace concepts, and the recruitment and training of new air traffic controllers.

en route

| (26) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 23, 24 and 25, the targets in the key performance area of capacity included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(26)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 23, 24 and 25, the targets in the key performance area of capacity included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

Review of capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

| (27) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1.(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Those targets were not found to raise concerns in respect of Romania. |
| --- | --- |

(27)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1.(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Those targets were not found to raise concerns in respect of Romania.

en route

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

| (28) | By Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission concluded that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Romania submitted in 2021 are inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Romania has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets in its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

By Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission concluded that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Romania submitted in 2021 are inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Romania has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets in its revised draft performance plan.

en route

en route

| (29) | The following table sets out the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Romania, as laid down in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022:













  En route charging zone of Romania | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020-2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 165,00 RON | 155,38 RON | 298,87 RON | 191,50 RON | 174,25 RON | 174,33 RON |
| 36,13 EUR | 34,03 EUR | 65,45 EUR | 41,94 EUR | 38,16 EUR | 38,18 EUR |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 165,00 RON | 155,38 RON | 298,87 RON | 179,53 RON | 163,47 RON | 160,39 RON |
| 36,13 EUR | 34,03 EUR | 65,45 EUR | 39,32 EUR | 35,80 EUR | 35,13 EUR |

(29)

The following table sets out the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Romania, as laid down in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022:

en route

En route charging zone of Romania

En route

2014 baseline value

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020-2021

2020-2021

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

165,00 RON

165,00 RON

155,38 RON

155,38 RON

298,87 RON

298,87 RON

191,50 RON

191,50 RON

174,25 RON

174,25 RON

174,33 RON

174,33 RON

36,13 EUR

36,13 EUR

34,03 EUR

34,03 EUR

65,45 EUR

65,45 EUR

41,94 EUR

41,94 EUR

38,16 EUR

38,16 EUR

38,18 EUR

38,18 EUR

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Revised en route

en route

165,00 RON

165,00 RON

155,38 RON

155,38 RON

298,87 RON

298,87 RON

179,53 RON

179,53 RON

163,47 RON

163,47 RON

160,39 RON

160,39 RON

36,13 EUR

34,03 EUR

65,45 EUR

39,32 EUR

35,80 EUR

35,13 EUR

| (30) | The Commission observes that Romania has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. Those targets result, when compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) which is 6,9 % lower over 2022, 2023 and 2024 and 5,4 % lower over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC reductions result from the upward revision of the traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, which are partly counterbalanced by an increase of the determined costs for the years 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(30)

The Commission observes that Romania has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. Those targets result, when compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) which is 6,9 % lower over 2022, 2023 and 2024 and 5,4 % lower over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC reductions result from the upward revision of the traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, which are partly counterbalanced by an increase of the determined costs for the years 2023 and 2024.

| (31) | The Commission notes that the traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan are based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast. The following table compares the en route service units forecasted for the charging zone for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, to the figures included in the draft performance plan:










  En route charging zone of Romania | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 4 360 | 5 022 | 5 269 |
| Updated traffic forecast (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 4 583 | 5 531 | 5 825 |
| Difference | +5,1  % | +10,1  % | +10,6  % |

(31)

The Commission notes that the traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan are based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast. The following table compares the en route service units forecasted for the charging zone for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, to the figures included in the draft performance plan:

en route

En route charging zone of Romania

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Initial traffic forecast (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

4 360

4 360

5 022

5 022

5 269

5 269

Updated traffic forecast (included in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Updated traffic forecast

en route

4 583

4 583

5 531

5 531

5 825

5 825

Difference

Difference

+5,1  %

+5,1  %

+10,1  %

+10,1  %

+10,6  %

+10,6  %

| (32) | When compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the annual increases in the number of service units for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 are in the range of 5 % to % 11 %. |
| --- | --- |

(32)

When compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the annual increases in the number of service units for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 are in the range of 5 % to % 11 %.

| (33) | The revised determined costs for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are set out in the following table:










  En route charging zone of Romania | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 835 M RON | 875 M RON | 919 M RON |
| Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the revised draft performance plan) | 823 M RON | 904 M RON | 934 M RON |
| Difference | -1,5  % | +3,3  % | +1,7  % |

(33)

The revised determined costs for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are set out in the following table:

En route charging zone of Romania

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

835 M RON

835 M RON

875 M RON

875 M RON

919 M RON

919 M RON

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices

823 M RON

823 M RON

904 M RON

904 M RON

934 M RON

934 M RON

Difference

Difference

-1,5  %

-1,5  %

+3,3  %

+3,3  %

+1,7  %

+1,7  %

| (34) | The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Romania for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, as set out in the following table:










  En route charging zone of Romania | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 116,1


  (2,1  %) | 119,1


  (2,6  %) | 122,2


  (2,6  %) |
| Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the revised draft performance plan) | 125,9


  (9,3  %) | 130,9


  (4,0  %) | 134,8


  (3,0  %) |

(34)

The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Romania for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, as set out in the following table:

En route charging zone of Romania

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

116,1

116,1

(2,1  %)

(2,1  %)

119,1

119,1

(2,6  %)

(2,6  %)

122,2

122,2

(2,6  %)

(2,6  %)

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised inflation index

125,9

125,9

(9,3  %)

(9,3  %

130,9

130,9

(4,0  %)

(4,0  %

134,8

134,8

(3,0  %)

(3,0  %

| (35) | Due to the update of the inflation forecast, the revised determined costs in nominal terms are planned to increase substantially in particular for the years 2023 and 2024, as follows:










  En route charging zone of Romania | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in nominal terms (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 946 M RON | 1 013 M RON | 1 088 M RON |
| Revised determined costs in nominal terms (included in the revised draft performance plan) | 1 000 M RON | 1 138 M RON | 1 209 M RON |
| Difference | +5,7  % | +12,3  % | +11,0  % |

(35)

Due to the update of the inflation forecast, the revised determined costs in nominal terms are planned to increase substantially in particular for the years 2023 and 2024, as follows:

En route charging zone of Romania

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

946 M RON

946 M RON

1 013 M RON

1 013 M RON

1 088 M RON

1 088 M RON

Revised determined costs in nominal terms (included in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in nominal terms

1 000 M RON

1 000 M RON

1 138 M RON

1 138 M RON

1 209 M RON

1 209 M RON

Difference

Difference

+5,7  %

+5,7  %

+12,3  %

+12,3  %

+11,0  %

+11,0  %

| (36) | The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Romania in accordance with the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(36)

The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Romania in accordance with the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (37) | As regards point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +0,8 % over RP3 outperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +2,9 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(37)

As regards point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +0,8 % over RP3 outperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +2,9 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (38) | As regards point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 of -0,3 % is way below the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this, however, constitutes an improvement from the long-term DUC trend of +0,6 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(38)

As regards point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 of -0,3 % is way below the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this, however, constitutes an improvement from the long-term DUC trend of +0,6 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (39) | As regards point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the EUR 34,03 baseline value for the DUC of Romania expressed in 2017 prices is 14,6 % lower than the EUR 39,84 average baseline value in EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group. |
| --- | --- |

(39)

As regards point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the EUR 34,03 baseline value for the DUC of Romania expressed in 2017 prices is 14,6 % lower than the EUR 39,84 average baseline value in EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group.

| (40) | It is clear that Romania’s revised cost-efficiency targets result in a DUC trend over RP3 which outperforms the corresponding Union-wide trend. Furthermore, Romania’s revised DUC for 2024 is lower than the baseline value for 2014, which demonstrates a reduction of the DUC over RP2 and RP3, even though the long-term Union-wide DUC trend is not met. Finally, Romania demonstrates a good cost-efficiency performance in respect of the baseline value for 2019 which is significantly lower than the corresponding comparator group average. Therefore, the Commission considers that, in respect of Romania, the deviation from the Union-wide long-term DUC trend, referred to in recital 38, does not preclude the cost-efficiency performance targets from being consistent with the Union-wide cost-efficiency performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(40)

It is clear that Romania’s revised cost-efficiency targets result in a DUC trend over RP3 which outperforms the corresponding Union-wide trend. Furthermore, Romania’s revised DUC for 2024 is lower than the baseline value for 2014, which demonstrates a reduction of the DUC over RP2 and RP3, even though the long-term Union-wide DUC trend is not met. Finally, Romania demonstrates a good cost-efficiency performance in respect of the baseline value for 2019 which is significantly lower than the corresponding comparator group average. Therefore, the Commission considers that, in respect of Romania, the deviation from the Union-wide long-term DUC trend, referred to in recital 38, does not preclude the cost-efficiency performance targets from being consistent with the Union-wide cost-efficiency performance targets.

| (41) | On balance, the Commission therefore considers that Romania has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its local cost-efficiency performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(41)

On balance, the Commission therefore considers that Romania has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its local cost-efficiency performance targets.

| (42) | In the light of what has been said in recitals 29 to 41, the targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(42)

In the light of what has been said in recitals 29 to 41, the targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the revised draft performance plan of Romania should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets.

Review of the revised cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of the revised cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

| (43) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, as set out in Articles 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(43)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, as set out in Articles 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

en route

| (44) | In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal cost-efficiency targets proposed by Romania in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Romania was to further justify those targets or revise them downwards. The Commission notes, however, that Romania has, on the contrary, revised those targets upwards for the years 2022 and 2023, including an increase of the determined costs in real terms for the year 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(44)

In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal cost-efficiency targets proposed by Romania in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Romania was to further justify those targets or revise them downwards. The Commission notes, however, that Romania has, on the contrary, revised those targets upwards for the years 2022 and 2023, including an increase of the determined costs in real terms for the year 2023.

| (45) | The Commission observes that the terminal DUC trend of Romania of +4,2 % over RP3 remains higher than the en route DUC trend of +0,8 % over RP3, and remains higher than the actual terminal DUC trend of -3,1 % observed over RP2. Furthermore, the terminal RP3 DUC trend has only marginally improved in comparison with the draft performance plan of Romania submitted in 2021, in which a terminal DUC trend of +4,3 % was observed. |
| --- | --- |

(45)

The Commission observes that the terminal DUC trend of Romania of +4,2 % over RP3 remains higher than the en route DUC trend of +0,8 % over RP3, and remains higher than the actual terminal DUC trend of -3,1 % observed over RP2. Furthermore, the terminal RP3 DUC trend has only marginally improved in comparison with the draft performance plan of Romania submitted in 2021, in which a terminal DUC trend of +4,3 % was observed.

en route

| (46) | Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 44 and 45, the Commission concludes that the revised terminal cost-efficiency performance targets of Romania continue to give rise to concerns. The Commission therefore reiterates its view that Romania should revise downwards those targets or provide adequate justifications for those targets, including for the increased determined costs of the year 2023. Romania should address those concerns in connection with the adoption of its final performance plan pursuant to Article 16, point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(46)

Therefore, in the light of what has been said in recitals 44 and 45, the Commission concludes that the revised terminal cost-efficiency performance targets of Romania continue to give rise to concerns. The Commission therefore reiterates its view that Romania should revise downwards those targets or provide adequate justifications for those targets, including for the increased determined costs of the year 2023. Romania should address those concerns in connection with the adoption of its final performance plan pursuant to Article 16, point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

Review of the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 complementing the Commission’s assessment of capacity targets

Review of the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 complementing the Commission’s assessment of capacity targets

| (47) | In accordance with point 2.1(f) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has complemented its assessment of capacity targets by reviewing the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. In that respect, the Commission has examined whether the proposed incentive schemes fulfil the substantive requirements set out in Article 11(1) and (3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(47)

In accordance with point 2.1(f) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has complemented its assessment of capacity targets by reviewing the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. In that respect, the Commission has examined whether the proposed incentive schemes fulfil the substantive requirements set out in Article 11(1) and (3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (48) | In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission concluded that Romania is to revise its incentive scheme for achieving terminal capacity targets in such a way that the maximum financial disadvantage stemming from that incentive scheme is set at a level having a material impact on the revenue at risk. The Commission notes that Romania has revised its incentive scheme for achieving terminal capacity targets by setting the resulting maximum financial disadvantage at a level equal to 1 % of determined costs. The revision addresses the concerns raised by the Commission in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728. The Commission does not have any further observations on the incentive schemes set out in the revised draft performance plan of Romania. |
| --- | --- |

(48)

In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission concluded that Romania is to revise its incentive scheme for achieving terminal capacity targets in such a way that the maximum financial disadvantage stemming from that incentive scheme is set at a level having a material impact on the revenue at risk. The Commission notes that Romania has revised its incentive scheme for achieving terminal capacity targets by setting the resulting maximum financial disadvantage at a level equal to 1 % of determined costs. The revision addresses the concerns raised by the Commission in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728. The Commission does not have any further observations on the incentive schemes set out in the revised draft performance plan of Romania.

CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

| (49) | In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission finds that the performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, |
| --- | --- |

(49)

In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission finds that the performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, and listed in the Annex to this Decision, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to Romania.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2022.

For the Commission

Adina VĂLEAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2019, p. 1.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 of 29 May 2019 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period starting on 1 January 2020 and ending on 31 December 2024 (OJ L 144, 3.6.2019, p. 49).

3

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 of 3 November 2020 on exceptional measures for the third reference period (2020-2024) of the single European sky performance and charging scheme due to COVID-19 pandemic (OJ L 366, 4.11.2020, p. 7).

4

(5)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 of 2 June 2021 setting revised Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period (2020-2024) and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (OJ L 195, 3.6.2021, p. 3).

5

(6)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 of 13 April 2022 on the inconsistency of certain performance targets contained in the draft national and functional airspace block performance plans submitted by Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (OJ L 135, 12.5.2022, p. 4).

6

---

ANNEX

Performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Romania pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY

Effectiveness of safety management

| Romania | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
| --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| ROMATSA | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | C |
| Safety risk management | C | C | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | C |
| Safety promotion | C | C | C |
| Safety culture | C | C | C |

Romania

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

2022

2023

2024

ROMATSA

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

C

Safety risk management

C

C

D

Safety assurance

C

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT

Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

| Romania | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 2,05  % | 2,05  % | 2,05  % |

Romania

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

2,05  %

2,05  %

2,05  %

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY

Average en route ATFM delay in minutes per flight

| Romania | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,04 | 0,04 | 0,04 |

Romania

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

0,04

0,04

0,04

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

Determined unit cost for en route air navigation services

| En route charging zone of Romania | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 -2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 165,00 RON | 155,38 RON | 298,87 RON | 179,53 RON | 163,47 RON | 160,39 RON |
| 36,13 EUR | 34,03 EUR | 65,45 EUR | 39,32 EUR | 35,80 EUR | 35,13 EUR |

En route charging zone of Romania

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 -2021

2022

2023

2024

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

165,00 RON

155,38 RON

298,87 RON

179,53 RON

163,47 RON

160,39 RON

36,13 EUR

34,03 EUR

65,45 EUR

39,32 EUR

35,80 EUR

35,13 EUR

---

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/136 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/136

---

COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2022/2425

of 5 December 2022

on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

(notified under document C(2022) 8743)

(Only the English and Maltese texts are authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 11(3), point (c), thereof,

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 of 11 February 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 (2), and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’), which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up performance plans, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’), which have to include binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned.

| (2) | Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). Since those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). Since those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic.

3

| (3) | In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On this basis, Member States submitted to the Commission, in October 2021, draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On this basis, Member States submitted to the Commission, in October 2021, draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3.

4

5

| (4) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of Malta are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of Malta are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets.

6

en route

| (5) | In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

| (6) | On 13 July 2022, Malta submitted a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’) for assessment to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

On 13 July 2022, Malta submitted a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’) for assessment to the Commission.

| (7) | The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan of Malta. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan of Malta.

| (8) | In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Malta on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Malta on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation.

| (9) | The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast published in June 2022 takes account of the changed circumstances referred to in recital 5. Based on that forecast, the Commission notes that Malta is not foreseen to experience adverse changes in traffic over RP3 as a result of Russia’s war in Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast published in June 2022 takes account of the changed circumstances referred to in recital 5. Based on that forecast, the Commission notes that Malta is not foreseen to experience adverse changes in traffic over RP3 as a result of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

| (10) | Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Malta regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) based on the criterion laid down in point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Malta regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) based on the criterion laid down in point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (11) | The local safety performance targets proposed by Malta in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:











  Malta | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Union-wide targets (2024) |
| MATS | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | D | C |
| Safety risk management | C | C | D | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | D | C |
| Safety promotion | C | C | D | C |
| Safety culture | C | C | C | C |

(11)

The local safety performance targets proposed by Malta in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:

Malta

Malta

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation

Air navigation service provider concerned

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

Safety management objective

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Union-wide targets (2024)

Union-wide targets (2024)

MATS

MATS

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

D

D

C

C

Safety risk management

C

C

D

D

D

D

Safety assurance

C

C

D

D

C

C

Safety promotion

C

C

D

D

C

C

Safety culture

C

C

C

C

C

C

| (12) | The safety targets proposed by Malta for MATS are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and even outperform, for 2024, the Union-wide performance targets in the areas of ‘safety policy and objectives’, ‘safety assurance’, and ‘safety promotion’. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The safety targets proposed by Malta for MATS are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and even outperform, for 2024, the Union-wide performance targets in the areas of ‘safety policy and objectives’, ‘safety assurance’, and ‘safety promotion’.

| (13) | The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta sets out measures for MATS for the achievement of the local safety targets, such as the introduction of a security operations centre and a network operations centre, the implementation of new safety software, the hiring of cyber security specialists to improve risk management, and the training of staff to comply with the change management requirements set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta sets out measures for MATS for the achievement of the local safety targets, such as the introduction of a security operations centre and a network operations centre, the implementation of new safety software, the hiring of cyber security specialists to improve risk management, and the training of staff to comply with the change management requirements set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373.

| (14) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 11 and 13, and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 are to be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Malta should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of safety. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 11 and 13, and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 are to be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Malta should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of safety.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

| (15) | Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Malta regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Malta have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, on 2 June 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Malta regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Malta have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, on 2 June 2021.

en route

en route

| (16) | Concerning the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local environment performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Concerning the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local environment performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (17) | The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Malta and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:









  Malta | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 1,80  % | 1,80  % | 1,80  % |
| Reference values | 1,80  % | 1,80  % | 1,80  % |

(17)

The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Malta and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:

en route

Malta

Malta

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

Targets in the key performance area of environment,

en route

1,80  %

1,80  %

1,80  %

1,80  %

1,80  %

1,80  %

Reference values

1,80  %

1,80  %

1,80  %

| (18) | The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Malta are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years from 2022 to 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Malta are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each of the years from 2022 to 2024.

| (19) | The Commission notes that Malta has presented, in the revised draft performance plan, measures for the achievement of the local environment targets which include the implementation of free route airspace above flight level 195, the design of a new terminal manoeuvring area, and new arrival and departure procedures. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The Commission notes that Malta has presented, in the revised draft performance plan, measures for the achievement of the local environment targets which include the implementation of free route airspace above flight level 195, the design of a new terminal manoeuvring area, and new arrival and departure procedures.

| (20) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 17 to 19, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Malta should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of environment. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 17 to 19, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Malta should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of environment.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

| (21) | Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Malta regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Malta have been compared with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, on 2 June 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Malta regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Malta have been compared with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, on 2 June 2021.

en route

| (22) | Concerning the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local capacity performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

Concerning the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local capacity performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to the years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (23) | The en route capacity targets proposed by Malta for RP3, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight, as well as the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan, are as follows:









  Malta | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,01 | 0,01 | 0,01 |
| Reference values | 0,01 | 0,01 | 0,01 |

(23)

The en route capacity targets proposed by Malta for RP3, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight, as well as the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan, are as follows:

en route

Malta

Malta

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

Targets in the key performance area of capacity

0,01

0,01

0,01

0,01

0,01

0,01

Reference values

0,01

0,01

0,01

| (24) | The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Malta are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each year from 2022 to 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Malta are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each year from 2022 to 2024.

| (25) | The Commission notes that Malta has presented in the draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets. Those measures include an increase in the number of air traffic controller full time equivalents by the end of RP3 and the implementation of free route airspace. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

The Commission notes that Malta has presented in the draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets. Those measures include an increase in the number of air traffic controller full time equivalents by the end of RP3 and the implementation of free route airspace.

en route

| (26) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 23 to 25, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Malta should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of capacity. |
| --- | --- |

(26)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 23 to 25, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Malta should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of capacity.

Review of draft capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of draft capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

| (27) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1.(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Those targets were not found to raise concerns in respect of Malta. |
| --- | --- |

(27)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1.(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Those targets were not found to raise concerns in respect of Malta.

en route

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

| (28) | The Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Malta submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Malta has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets as part of its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

The Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Malta submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Malta has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets as part of its revised draft performance plan.

en route

en route

| (29) | The table below shows the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Malta, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022.













  En route charging zone of Malta | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 -2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 21,50 EUR | 22,98 EUR | 44,08 EUR | 31,85 EUR | 24,83 EUR | 24,85 EUR |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 21,50 EUR | 22,98 EUR | 44,08 EUR | 27,44 EUR | 21,61 EUR | 22,09 EUR |

(29)

The table below shows the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Malta, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022.

en route

En route charging zone of Malta

En route

2014 baseline value

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 -2021

2020 -2021

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

21,50 EUR

21,50 EUR

22,98 EUR

22,98 EUR

44,08 EUR

44,08 EUR

31,85 EUR

31,85 EUR

24,83 EUR

24,83 EUR

24,85 EUR

24,85 EUR

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Revised en route

en route

21,50 EUR

21,50 EUR

22,98 EUR

22,98 EUR

44,08 EUR

44,08 EUR

27,44 EUR

27,44 EUR

21,61 EUR

21,61 EUR

22,09 EUR

22,09 EUR

| (30) | The Commission observes that Malta has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the time period from 2022 to 2024, which results, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) lower by 12,3 % over those three years and lower by 8,7 % over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC reductions result both from the updated traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan for each of the years from 2022 to 2024 and from the downward revision of the determined costs expressed in real terms in 2017 prices for those years. |
| --- | --- |

(30)

The Commission observes that Malta has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the time period from 2022 to 2024, which results, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) lower by 12,3 % over those three years and lower by 8,7 % over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC reductions result both from the updated traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan for each of the years from 2022 to 2024 and from the downward revision of the determined costs expressed in real terms in 2017 prices for those years.

| (31) | The changes to the traffic forecast for each of the years from 2022 to 2024 are presented in the table below. The Commission notes that the traffic forecast used in the revised draft performance plan is based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast.










  En route charging zone of Malta | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 714 | 957 | 1 002 |
| Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 811 | 1 006 | 1 044 |
| Difference | +13,6  % | +5,1  % | +4,3  % |

(31)

The changes to the traffic forecast for each of the years from 2022 to 2024 are presented in the table below. The Commission notes that the traffic forecast used in the revised draft performance plan is based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast.

En route charging zone of Malta

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

714

714

957

957

1 002

1 002

Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

en route

811

811

1 006

1 006

1 044

1 044

Difference

Difference

+13,6  %

+13,6  %

+5,1  %

+5,1  %

+4,3  %

+4,3  %

| (32) | The revised determined costs for each of the years from 2022 to 2024, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are shown in the table below.










  En route charging zone of Malta | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 23 M EUR | 24 M EUR | 25 M EUR |
| Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 22 M EUR | 22 M EUR | 23 M EUR |
| Difference | -2,2  % | -8,5  % | -7,4  % |

(32)

The revised determined costs for each of the years from 2022 to 2024, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are shown in the table below.

En route charging zone of Malta

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

23 M EUR

23 M EUR

24 M EUR

24 M EUR

25 M EUR

25 M EUR

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices

22 M EUR

22 M EUR

22 M EUR

22 M EUR

23 M EUR

23 M EUR

Difference

Difference

-2,2  %

-2,2  %

-8,5  %

-8,5  %

-7,4  %

-7,4  %

| (33) | The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Malta for each of the calendar years from 2022 to 2024, as outlined in the table below.










  En route charging zone of Malta | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 106,7

  (1,8  %) | 108,8

  (2,0  %) | 111,0

  (2,0  %) |
| Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 109,7

  (4,7  %) | 112,8

  (2,8  %) | 115,1

  (2,1  %) |

(33)

The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Malta for each of the calendar years from 2022 to 2024, as outlined in the table below.

En route charging zone of Malta

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

106,7

106,7

(1,8  %)

1,8  %

108,8

108,8

(2,0  %)

2,0  %

111,0

111,0

(2,0  %)

2,0  %

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis

109,7

109,7

(4,7  %)

4,7  %

112,8

112,8

(2,8  %)

2,8  %

115,1

115,1

(2,1  %)

2,1  %

| (34) | Due to the update of the inflation forecast, the revised determined costs in nominal terms for year 2022 remain largely unchanged. However, the Commission observes that Malta revised downwards the nominal determined costs for years 2023 and 2024.










  En route charging zone of Malta | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 24 M EUR | 25 M EUR | 27 M EUR |
| Revised determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 24 M EUR | 24 M EUR | 26 M EUR |
| Difference | -0,2  % | -5,8  % | -4,5  % |

(34)

Due to the update of the inflation forecast, the revised determined costs in nominal terms for year 2022 remain largely unchanged. However, the Commission observes that Malta revised downwards the nominal determined costs for years 2023 and 2024.

En route charging zone of Malta

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

24 M EUR

24 M EUR

25 M EUR

25 M EUR

27 M EUR

27 M EUR

Revised determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in nominal terms

24 M EUR

24 M EUR

24 M EUR

24 M EUR

26 M EUR

26 M EUR

Difference

Difference

-0,2  %

-0,2  %

-5,8  %

-5,8  %

-4,5  %

-4,5  %

| (35) | The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed for the Malta en route charging zone based on the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(35)

The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed for the Malta en route charging zone based on the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

en route

| (36) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of -1,0 % over RP3 outperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +2,0 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(36)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of -1,0 % over RP3 outperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes an improvement from the DUC trend of +2,0 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (37) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 of +0,3 % underperforms the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this, however, constitutes an improvement from the long-term DUC trend of +1,6 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(37)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 of +0,3 % underperforms the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this, however, constitutes an improvement from the long-term DUC trend of +1,6 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (38) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the baseline value for the DUC of EUR 22,98 of Malta in EUR2017 is 19,7 % lower than the average baseline value of 28,64 in EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group. |
| --- | --- |

(38)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the baseline value for the DUC of EUR 22,98 of Malta in EUR2017 is 19,7 % lower than the average baseline value of 28,64 in EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group.

| (39) | As specified in recital 36, Malta’s revised cost-efficiency targets result in a DUC trend over RP3 which significantly outperforms the corresponding Union-wide trend and shows a reduction of the DUC over the reference period. Furthermore, referring to recital 38, Malta demonstrates a good cost-efficiency performance in respect of its baseline value for 2019, which is significantly lower than the corresponding comparator group average. Finally, the Commission notes that Malta has revised downwards the determined costs for RP3 both in real and nominal terms, whilst planning to serve additional traffic on the basis of the updated traffic forecast for RP3. Therefore, the Commission considers that the deviation from the Union-wide long-term DUC trend observed in recital 37 does not preclude the establishment of consistency with the Union-wide cost-efficiency performance targets in respect of Malta. |
| --- | --- |

(39)

As specified in recital 36, Malta’s revised cost-efficiency targets result in a DUC trend over RP3 which significantly outperforms the corresponding Union-wide trend and shows a reduction of the DUC over the reference period. Furthermore, referring to recital 38, Malta demonstrates a good cost-efficiency performance in respect of its baseline value for 2019, which is significantly lower than the corresponding comparator group average. Finally, the Commission notes that Malta has revised downwards the determined costs for RP3 both in real and nominal terms, whilst planning to serve additional traffic on the basis of the updated traffic forecast for RP3. Therefore, the Commission considers that the deviation from the Union-wide long-term DUC trend observed in recital 37 does not preclude the establishment of consistency with the Union-wide cost-efficiency performance targets in respect of Malta.

| (40) | Having regard to the foregoing observations, the Commission notes that Malta has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728. |
| --- | --- |

(40)

Having regard to the foregoing observations, the Commission notes that Malta has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728.

| (41) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 29 to 40, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Malta should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency. |
| --- | --- |

(41)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 29 to 40, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Malta should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency.

Review of revised cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of revised cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

| (42) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of the en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(42)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of the en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

en route

| (43) | In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal cost-efficiency targets proposed by Malta in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Malta should further justify those targets or revise them downwards. The Commission notes, however, that Malta has, on the contrary, revised those targets upwards, except for year 2023, without providing related justifications. |
| --- | --- |

(43)

In Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, the Commission raised concerns regarding the terminal cost-efficiency targets proposed by Malta in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and considered that Malta should further justify those targets or revise them downwards. The Commission notes, however, that Malta has, on the contrary, revised those targets upwards, except for year 2023, without providing related justifications.

| (44) | The Commission observes that the terminal DUC trend of Malta of +5,0 % over RP3 remains higher than the en route DUC trend of -1,0 % over RP3 and remains higher than the actual terminal DUC trend of +0,6 % observed over RP2. Furthermore, the terminal RP3 DUC trend has worsened in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in which a terminal DUC trend of +4,3 % was observed. |
| --- | --- |

(44)

The Commission observes that the terminal DUC trend of Malta of +5,0 % over RP3 remains higher than the en route DUC trend of -1,0 % over RP3 and remains higher than the actual terminal DUC trend of +0,6 % observed over RP2. Furthermore, the terminal RP3 DUC trend has worsened in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in which a terminal DUC trend of +4,3 % was observed.

en route

| (45) | On the basis of the findings in recitals 43 and 44, the Commission concludes that the revised terminal cost-efficiency performance targets of Malta continue to give rise to concerns. The Commission therefore reiterates its view, as set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, that Malta should revise downwards those targets or provide adequate justifications for those targets, including for the additional cost increases applied in years 2022 and 2024. The Commission invites Malta to address this observation in connection with the adoption of its final performance plan in accordance with Article 16, point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(45)

On the basis of the findings in recitals 43 and 44, the Commission concludes that the revised terminal cost-efficiency performance targets of Malta continue to give rise to concerns. The Commission therefore reiterates its view, as set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728, that Malta should revise downwards those targets or provide adequate justifications for those targets, including for the additional cost increases applied in years 2022 and 2024. The Commission invites Malta to address this observation in connection with the adoption of its final performance plan in accordance with Article 16, point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

Review of the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 complementing the Commission’s assessment of capacity targets

Review of the incentive schemes referred to in Article 11 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 complementing the Commission’s assessment of capacity targets

| (46) | In accordance with point 2.1(f) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, in relation to the assessment of the local capacity targets, the Commission has reviewed the incentive schemes contained in the revised draft performance plan of Malta. The Commission has examined, in particular, whether those incentive schemes fulfil the substantive requirements set out in in Article 11(1) and (3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. The Commission notes that Malta has not made any changes to those incentive schemes in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(46)

In accordance with point 2.1(f) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, in relation to the assessment of the local capacity targets, the Commission has reviewed the incentive schemes contained in the revised draft performance plan of Malta. The Commission has examined, in particular, whether those incentive schemes fulfil the substantive requirements set out in in Article 11(1) and (3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. The Commission notes that Malta has not made any changes to those incentive schemes in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

| (47) | In respect of the en route and terminal capacity schemes proposed by Malta, the Commission, on the basis of expert advice provided by the performance review body, has strong doubts whether the proposed maximum financial disadvantages, which amount to 0,5 % and 0,25 % of determined costs respectively, would have any material impact on the revenue at risk, as required pursuant to point (a) of Article 11(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(47)

In respect of the en route and terminal capacity schemes proposed by Malta, the Commission, on the basis of expert advice provided by the performance review body, has strong doubts whether the proposed maximum financial disadvantages, which amount to 0,5 % and 0,25 % of determined costs respectively, would have any material impact on the revenue at risk, as required pursuant to point (a) of Article 11(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

en route

| (48) | Therefore, Malta should revise, in connection with the adoption of its final performance plan in accordance with Article 16, point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, its incentive schemes for achieving en route and terminal capacity targets so that the maximum financial disadvantages stemming from those incentive schemes are set at a level having a material impact on the revenue at risk, as expressly required under Article 11(3), point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, which in the Commission’s view should lead to a maximum financial disadvantage equal to or higher than 1 % of determined costs. |
| --- | --- |

(48)

Therefore, Malta should revise, in connection with the adoption of its final performance plan in accordance with Article 16, point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, its incentive schemes for achieving en route and terminal capacity targets so that the maximum financial disadvantages stemming from those incentive schemes are set at a level having a material impact on the revenue at risk, as expressly required under Article 11(3), point (a) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, which in the Commission’s view should lead to a maximum financial disadvantage equal to or higher than 1 % of determined costs.

en route

CONCLUSIONS

CONCLUSIONS

| (49) | In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission finds that the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, |
| --- | --- |

(49)

In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission finds that the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, and listed in the Annex to this Decision, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Malta.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2022.

For the Commission

Adina VĂLEAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 56, 25.2.2019, p. 1.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 of 29 May 2019 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period starting on 1 January 2020 and ending on 31 December 2024 (OJ L 144, 3.6.2019, p. 49).

3

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 of 3 November 2020 on exceptional measures for the third reference period (2020-2024) of the single European sky performance and charging scheme due to COVID-19 pandemic (OJ L 366, 4.11.2020, p. 7).

4

(5)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 of 2 June 2021 setting revised Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period (2020-2024) and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (OJ L 195, 3.6.2021, p. 3).

5

(6)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 of 13 April 2022 on the inconsistency of certain performance targets contained in the draft national and functional airspace block performance plans submitted by Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (OJ L 135, 12.5.2022, p. 4).

6

---

ANNEX

Performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Malta pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY

Effectiveness of safety management

| Malta | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
| --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| MATS | Safety policy and objectives | C | C | D |
| Safety risk management | C | C | D |
| Safety assurance | C | C | D |
| Safety promotion | C | C | D |
| Safety culture | C | C | C |

Malta

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

2022

2023

2024

MATS

Safety policy and objectives

C

C

D

Safety risk management

C

C

D

Safety assurance

C

C

D

Safety promotion

C

C

D

Safety culture

C

C

C

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT

Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

| Malta | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 1,80  % | 1,80  % | 1,80  % |

Malta

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

1,80  %

1,80  %

1,80  %

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY

Average en route ATFM delay in minutes per flight

| Malta | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,01 | 0,01 | 0,01 |

Malta

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

0,01

0,01

0,01

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

Determined unit cost for en route air navigation services

| En route charging zone of Malta | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 -2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 21,50 EUR | 22,98 EUR | 44,08 EUR | 27,44 EUR | 21,61 EUR | 22,09 EUR |

En route charging zone of Malta

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 -2021

2022

2023

2024

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

21,50 EUR

22,98 EUR

44,08 EUR

27,44 EUR

21,61 EUR

22,09 EUR

---

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/147 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/147

---

COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2022/2426

of 5 December 2022

on the consistency of the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

(notified under document C(2022) 8718)

(Only the Latvian text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 11(3) point (c), thereof,

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 of 11 February 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 (2), and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’), binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, Member States are to draw up, either at national level or at the level of functional airspace blocks (‘FABs’), binding performance targets for each reference period of the performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions. Those performance targets have to be consistent with the Union-wide targets adopted by the Commission for the reference period concerned.

| (2) | Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). As those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period (‘RP3’) were originally set out in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (3). As those Union-wide performance targets and the draft RP3 performance plans subsequently submitted in October 2019 by Member States were drawn up before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, they did not take account of the considerable reduction in air traffic due to the measures taken by the Member States and third countries to contain the pandemic.

3

| (3) | In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On this basis, Member States submitted to the Commission, in October 2021, draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of air navigation services, exceptional measures for RP3, which derogate from the provisions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, were set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 (4). The Commission adopted, on 2 June 2021, Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 (5) setting revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3. On this basis, Member States submitted to the Commission, in October 2021, draft performance plans containing revised local performance targets for RP3.

4

5

| (4) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of Latvia are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 (6) was addressed to Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden. In that Decision, the Commission found that the en route cost-efficiency performance targets included in the draft performance plan for RP3 of Latvia are not consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and issued recommendations for the revision of those targets.

6

en route

| (5) | In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States, including Latvia, have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, which started on 24 February 2022, the Union has imposed restrictive measures which prohibit Russian air carriers, any Russian-registered aircraft and any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, from landing in and taking off from, or overflying the territory of the Union. Those restrictive measures and the counter-measures adopted by Russia have led to changes in air traffic in European airspace. Certain Member States, including Latvia, have been severely affected by a significant reduction in the number of overflights in the airspace under their responsibility. However, at Union-wide level, the observed impact on the number of flights has been limited in contrast with the sharp reduction of air traffic across Europe which resulted from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

| (6) | On 13 July 2022, Latvia submitted a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’). |
| --- | --- |

(6)

On 13 July 2022, Latvia submitted a revised draft performance plan for RP3 (the ‘revised draft performance plan’).

| (7) | The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan of Latvia. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The performance review body, assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, has submitted to the Commission a report containing its advice on the assessment of the revised draft performance plan of Latvia.

| (8) | In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

In accordance with Article 15(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the local performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia on the basis of the assessment criteria laid down in point 1 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation, and taking account of local circumstances. In respect of each key performance area and the related performance targets, the Commission has complemented its assessment by reviewing the elements set out in point 2 of Annex IV to that Implementing Regulation.

| (9) | The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast, published in June 2022, takes account of the change in circumstances with respect to air traffic in European airspace. Based on that forecast, the Commission notes that Latvia continues to face a significantly deteriorated traffic outlook for the remainder of RP3 as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. As those changed circumstances considerably impact the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia, they should be taken into account in the assessment of the local performance targets contained therein. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Eurocontrol Statistics and Forecast Service (‘STATFOR’) base traffic forecast, published in June 2022, takes account of the change in circumstances with respect to air traffic in European airspace. Based on that forecast, the Commission notes that Latvia continues to face a significantly deteriorated traffic outlook for the remainder of RP3 as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. As those changed circumstances considerably impact the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia, they should be taken into account in the assessment of the local performance targets contained therein.

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

COMMISSION ASSESSMENT

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of safety

| (10) | Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Latvia regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) based on the criterion laid down in point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Concerning the key performance area of safety, the Commission has assessed the consistency of the targets submitted by Latvia regarding the effectiveness of safety management of air navigation service providers (‘ANSPs’) based on the criterion laid down in point 1.1 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (11) | The local safety performance targets proposed by Latvia in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:











  Latvia | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Union-wide targets




  (2024) |
| LGS | Safety policy and objectives | C | D | D | C |
| Safety risk management | C | D | D | D |
| Safety assurance | C | D | D | C |
| Safety promotion | C | D | D | C |
| Safety culture | C | D | D | C |

(11)

The local safety performance targets proposed by Latvia in respect of the effectiveness of safety management, broken down per safety management objective and expressed as a level of implementation, are as follows:

Latvia

Latvia

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Air navigation service provider concerned

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

Safety management objective

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Union-wide targets

Union-wide targets

(2024)

(2024)

LGS

LGS

Safety policy and objectives

C

D

D

D

C

C

Safety risk management

C

D

D

D

D

D

Safety assurance

C

D

D

D

C

C

Safety promotion

C

D

D

D

C

C

Safety culture

C

D

D

D

C

C

| (12) | The safety targets proposed by Latvia for LGS are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and even outperform, for 2023 and 2024, the Union-wide performance targets in the areas of ‘safety policy and objectives’, ‘safety assurance’, ‘safety promotion’, and ‘safety culture’. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The safety targets proposed by Latvia for LGS are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets and even outperform, for 2023 and 2024, the Union-wide performance targets in the areas of ‘safety policy and objectives’, ‘safety assurance’, ‘safety promotion’, and ‘safety culture’.

| (13) | The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia sets out measures for LGS for the achievement of the local safety targets, such as regular staff training, the revision of the safety management system procedures, evaluations of safety processes and just culture, simulated exercises, dissemination of safety data, and integration of safety management principles in business planning and decision-making. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Commission notes that the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia sets out measures for LGS for the achievement of the local safety targets, such as regular staff training, the revision of the safety management system procedures, evaluations of safety processes and just culture, simulated exercises, dissemination of safety data, and integration of safety management principles in business planning and decision-making.

| (14) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 11 to 13, and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 are to be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of safety. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 11 to 13, and considering that the Union-wide safety performance targets set in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 are to be achieved by the final year of RP3, namely 2024, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of safety.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of environment

| (15) | Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Latvia regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, on 2 June 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by Latvia regarding the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia have been compared with the relevant en route horizontal flight efficiency reference values set out in the European Route Network Improvement Plan (‘ERNIP’) available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, on 2 June 2021.

en route

en route

| (16) | Concerning the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local environment performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

Concerning the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of environment, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local environment performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local environment performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (17) | The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Latvia and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:









  Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 1,25  % | 1,25  % | 1,25  % |
| Reference values | 1,25  % | 1,25  % | 1,25  % |

(17)

The performance targets in the key performance area of environment proposed by Latvia and the corresponding national reference values for RP3 from the ERNIP, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, are as follows:

en route

Latvia

Latvia

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

Targets in the key performance area of environment,

en route

1,25  %

1,25  %

1,25  %

1,25  %

1,25  %

1,25  %

Reference values

1,25  %

1,25  %

1,25  %

| (18) | The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Latvia are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each year from 2022 to 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The Commission observes that the environment targets proposed by Latvia are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each year from 2022 to 2024.

| (19) | The Commission notes that Latvia has presented in the revised draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local environment targets which mainly fulfil already existing legal requirements under Union law and include the deployment of airport collaborative decision making, the adoption of performance-based navigation flight procedures, as well as the implementation of free route airspace. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The Commission notes that Latvia has presented in the revised draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local environment targets which mainly fulfil already existing legal requirements under Union law and include the deployment of airport collaborative decision making, the adoption of performance-based navigation flight procedures, as well as the implementation of free route airspace.

| (20) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 17 to 19, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of environment. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 17 to 19, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of environment.

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

Assessment of performance targets in the key performance area of capacity

| (21) | Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Latvia regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia have been compared with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, on 2 June 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by Latvia regarding the average en route air traffic flow management (‘ATFM’) delay per flight has been assessed based on the criterion laid down in point 1.3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Accordingly, the proposed targets contained in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia have been compared with the relevant reference values set out in the Network Operations Plan available at the time of adopting the revised Union-wide performance targets for RP3, on 2 June 2021.

en route

| (22) | Concerning the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local capacity performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to years 2022, 2023 and 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

Concerning the year 2020, the Union-wide performance target for RP3 in the key performance area of capacity, which was initially set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903, before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, was not revised by Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891, considering that the period for the application of that target had expired and that its implementation had thus become definitive leaving no possibility for retroactive adjustments. Similarly, the local capacity performance targets for the year 2021 set by Member States in the draft performance plans submitted in October 2021 could not be retroactively modified in the revised draft performance plans. Therefore, the consistency of the local capacity performance targets with the corresponding Union-wide performance targets should be assessed with regard to years 2022, 2023 and 2024.

| (23) | The en route capacity targets proposed by Latvia for RP3, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight, as well as the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan, are as follows:









  Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,03 | 0,03 | 0,03 |
| Reference values | 0,03 | 0,03 | 0,03 |

(23)

The en route capacity targets proposed by Latvia for RP3, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight, as well as the corresponding reference values from the Network Operations Plan, are as follows:

en route

Latvia

Latvia

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

Targets in the key performance area of capacity

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,03

Reference values

0,03

0,03

0,03

| (24) | The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Latvia are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each year from 2022 to 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

The Commission observes that the capacity targets proposed by Latvia are equal to the corresponding national reference values for each year from 2022 to 2024.

| (25) | The Commission observes that Latvia has presented in the revised draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets. Those measures relate to air traffic controllers and include a new training programme as well as improved staffing in different sectorization scenarios. The Commission notes that in respect of the draft performance plan of Latvia submitted in 2021, the air navigation service provider LGS has reduced the planned number of air traffic controller full-time equivalents in operations for the years 2022 to 2024, due to the change in circumstances outlined in recitals 5 and 9. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

The Commission observes that Latvia has presented in the revised draft performance plan measures for the achievement of the local en route capacity targets. Those measures relate to air traffic controllers and include a new training programme as well as improved staffing in different sectorization scenarios. The Commission notes that in respect of the draft performance plan of Latvia submitted in 2021, the air navigation service provider LGS has reduced the planned number of air traffic controller full-time equivalents in operations for the years 2022 to 2024, due to the change in circumstances outlined in recitals 5 and 9.

en route

| (26) | On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 23 to 25, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of capacity. |
| --- | --- |

(26)

On the basis of the findings set out in recitals 23 to 25, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of capacity.

Review of capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of capacity targets for terminal air navigation services

| (27) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1.(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Those targets were not found to raise any concerns in respect of Latvia. |
| --- | --- |

(27)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Article 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route capacity targets by reviewing the capacity targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1.(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Those targets were not found to raise any concerns in respect of Latvia.

en route

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

Assessment of revised performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency

| (28) | With reference to in recital 4, the Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Latvia submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Latvia has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets in its revised draft performance plan. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

With reference to in recital 4, the Commission concluded in Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 that the proposed en route cost-efficiency targets included in the draft performance plan of Latvia submitted in 2021 were inconsistent with the Union-wide performance targets. Latvia has proposed revised en route cost-efficiency targets in its revised draft performance plan.

en route

en route

| (29) | The table below shows the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Latvia, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022.













  En route charging zone of Latvia | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020-2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 27,90 EUR | 23,61 EUR | 40,07 EUR | 31,28 EUR | 29,14 EUR | 26,83 EUR |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 27,90 EUR | 23,61 EUR | 40,07 EUR | 38,04 EUR | 35,62 EUR | 33,59 EUR |

(29)

The table below shows the initial RP3 en route cost-efficiency performance targets for the charging zone of Latvia, as contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, and the corresponding revised performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted in 2022.

en route

En route charging zone of Latvia

En route

2014 baseline value

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020-2021

2020-2021

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Initial en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

27,90 EUR

27,90 EUR

23,61 EUR

23,61 EUR

40,07 EUR

40,07 EUR

31,28 EUR

31,28 EUR

29,14 EUR

29,14 EUR

26,83 EUR

26,83 EUR

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

Revised en route

en route

27,90 EUR

27,90 EUR

23,61 EUR

23,61 EUR

40,07 EUR

40,07 EUR

38,04 EUR

38,04 EUR

35,62 EUR

35,62 EUR

33,59 EUR

33,59 EUR

| (30) | The Commission observes that Latvia has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the time period from 2022 to 2024, which results, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) higher by 23,0 % over those three years and higher by 16,4 % over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC increases result from the significant deterioration in the traffic forecast, which has been caused by the reduction of air traffic in Latvia’s airspace as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as referred to in recitals 5 and 9. The lower number of forecasted service units for each year from 2022 to 2024 has however been partly offset by Latvia through a reduction of determined costs. |
| --- | --- |

(30)

The Commission observes that Latvia has revised its local cost-efficiency targets for the time period from 2022 to 2024, which results, in comparison with the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, in an overall determined unit cost (‘DUC’) higher by 23,0 % over those three years and higher by 16,4 % over RP3 as a whole. Those DUC increases result from the significant deterioration in the traffic forecast, which has been caused by the reduction of air traffic in Latvia’s airspace as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as referred to in recitals 5 and 9. The lower number of forecasted service units for each year from 2022 to 2024 has however been partly offset by Latvia through a reduction of determined costs.

| (31) | The Commission notes that the traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan are based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast. The en route service units forecasted for the charging zone for each year from 2022 to 2024, in comparison with the figures contained in the draft performance plan, are presented in the table below.










  En route charging zone of Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 736 | 842 | 906 |
| Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units | 466 | 548 | 570 |
| Difference | -36,7  % | -34,9  % | -37,1  % |

(31)

The Commission notes that the traffic assumptions used in the revised draft performance plan are based on the Eurocontrol STATFOR June 2022 base traffic forecast. The en route service units forecasted for the charging zone for each year from 2022 to 2024, in comparison with the figures contained in the draft performance plan, are presented in the table below.

en route

En route charging zone of Latvia

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of en route service units

736

736

842

842

906

906

Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of en route service units

Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

en route

466

466

548

548

570

570

Difference

Difference

-36,7  %

-36,7  %

-34,9  %

-34,9  %

-37,1  %

-37,1  %

| (32) | Compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the annual reductions in the number of service units for each year from 2022 to 2024 are in the approximate range of -35 % to -37 %. Accordingly, the en route service units for Latvia are expected to remain, in 2024, 40,1 % below their pre-pandemic level (year 2019), whereas they were previously foreseen to exceed the pre-pandemic level by 11,4 % in the STATFOR base traffic forecast of October 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(32)

Compared to the draft performance plan submitted in 2021, the annual reductions in the number of service units for each year from 2022 to 2024 are in the approximate range of -35 % to -37 %. Accordingly, the en route service units for Latvia are expected to remain, in 2024, 40,1 % below their pre-pandemic level (year 2019), whereas they were previously foreseen to exceed the pre-pandemic level by 11,4 % in the STATFOR base traffic forecast of October 2021.

en route

| (33) | However, as shown in the table below, the flight movements in Latvian airspace operated under instrument flight rules (IFR) are not foreseen to decrease at the same rate as the en route service units. This discrepancy is due to the significant reduction of overflights, which on average generates proportionally higher numbers of en route service units than flights landing and departing from airports in Latvia.










  En route charging zone of Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of IFR movements | 229 | 262 | 282 |
| Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of IFR movements | 177 | 213 | 221 |
| Difference | -22,8  % | -18,8  % | -21,7  % |

(33)

However, as shown in the table below, the flight movements in Latvian airspace operated under instrument flight rules (IFR) are not foreseen to decrease at the same rate as the en route service units. This discrepancy is due to the significant reduction of overflights, which on average generates proportionally higher numbers of en route service units than flights landing and departing from airports in Latvia.

en route

en route

En route charging zone of Latvia

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of IFR movements

Initial traffic forecast (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021), expressed in thousands of IFR movements

229

229

262

262

282

282

Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan), expressed in thousands of IFR movements

Updated traffic forecast (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

thousands of IFR movements

177

177

213

213

221

221

Difference

Difference

-22,8  %

-22,8  %

-18,8  %

-18,8  %

-21,7  %

-21,7  %

| (34) | The Commission hence notes that the workload of the ANSP, which is driven by the controlled flight movements, is not foreseen to diminish in correlation with the revenue reduction which stems from the lower number of en route service units. |
| --- | --- |

(34)

The Commission hence notes that the workload of the ANSP, which is driven by the controlled flight movements, is not foreseen to diminish in correlation with the revenue reduction which stems from the lower number of en route service units.

en route

| (35) | The revised determined costs for years 2022 to 2024, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are shown in the table below. The Commission notes that Latvia has revised downwards the determined costs in real terms for each of those years.










  En route charging zone of Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 23 M EUR | 24,5 M EUR | 24,3 M EUR |
| Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 18 M EUR | 20 M EUR | 19 M EUR |
| Difference | -23,0  % | -20,4  % | -21,3  % |

(35)

The revised determined costs for years 2022 to 2024, expressed in real terms in 2017 prices, are shown in the table below. The Commission notes that Latvia has revised downwards the determined costs in real terms for each of those years.

En route charging zone of Latvia

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

23 M EUR

23 M EUR

24,5 M EUR

24,5 M EUR

24,3 M EUR

24,3 M EUR

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in real terms in 2017 prices

18 M EUR

20 M EUR

20 M EUR

19 M EUR

19 M EUR

Difference

Difference

-23,0  %

-23,0  %

-20,4  %

-20,4  %

-21,3  %

-21,3  %

| (36) | The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Latvia for each year from 2022 to 2024, as outlined in the following table.










  En route charging zone of Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 110,0


  (2,2  %) | 112,1


  (1,9  %) | 114,5


  (2,1  %) |
| Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 119,7

  (10,0  %) | 124,3

  (3,9  %) | 128,1

  (3,1  %) |

(36)

The revised draft performance plan comprises an updated inflation forecast for Latvia for each year from 2022 to 2024, as outlined in the following table.

En route charging zone of Latvia

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial inflation index, with forecasted year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

110,0

110,0

(2,2  %)

(2,2  %)

112,1

112,1

(1,9  %)

(1,9  %)

114,5

114,5

(2,1  %)

(2,1  %)

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised inflation index, with year-on-year change in inflation in parenthesis (data contained in the revised draft performance plan)

119,7

119,7

(10,0  %)

10,0  %

124,3

124,3

(3,9  %)

3,9  %

128,1

128,1

(3,1  %)

3,1  %

| (37) | The table below displays the determined costs in nominal terms for each year from 2022 to 2024. The Commission observes that Latvia revised downwards the nominal determined costs for years 2023 and 2024, despite the upward revision of the inflation forecast.










  En route charging zone of Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021) | 24,7 M EUR | 26,7 M EUR | 26,9 M EUR |
| Revised determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the revised draft performance plan) | 20 M EUR | 23 M EUR | 23 M EUR |
| Difference | -18,9  % | -14,9  % | -15,2  % |

(37)

The table below displays the determined costs in nominal terms for each year from 2022 to 2024. The Commission observes that Latvia revised downwards the nominal determined costs for years 2023 and 2024, despite the upward revision of the inflation forecast.

En route charging zone of Latvia

En route

2022

2022

2023

2023

2024

2024

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

Initial determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021)

24,7 M EUR

24,7 M EUR

26,7 M EUR

26,7 M EUR

26,9 M EUR

26,9 M EUR

Revised determined costs in nominal terms (contained in the revised draft performance plan)

Revised determined costs in nominal terms

20 M EUR

20 M EUR

23 M EUR

23 M EUR

23 M EUR

23 M EUR

Difference

Difference

-18,9  %

-18,9  %

-14,9  %

-14,9  %

-15,2  %

-15,2  %

| (38) | The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Latvia based on the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. |
| --- | --- |

(38)

The Commission has assessed the consistency of the revised cost-efficiency targets proposed by Latvia based on the criteria laid down in points 1.4(a), (b) and (c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317.

| (39) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +9,2 % over RP3 underperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes a deterioration from the DUC trend of +3,3 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(39)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(a) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the en route DUC trend at charging zone level of +9,2 % over RP3 underperforms the Union-wide trend of +1,0 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes a deterioration from the DUC trend of +3,3 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (40) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 of +2,1 % underperforms the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes a deterioration from the long-term DUC trend of -0,4 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(40)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(b) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the long-term en route DUC trend at charging zone level over the second reference period (‘RP2’) and RP3 of +2,1 % underperforms the long-term Union-wide trend of -1,3 % over the same period. The Commission notes that this constitutes a deterioration from the long-term DUC trend of -0,4 % calculated on the basis of the draft performance plan submitted in 2021.

en route

| (41) | With reference to recitals 31 and 32, the Commission recalls that Latvia’s service unit forecast for RP3 has been revised significantly downwards as a consequence of the traffic changes resulting from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. It is therefore necessary and appropriate to examine, for the purpose of the assessment criteria examined in recitals 39 and 40, whether Latvia would meet the Union-wide cost-efficiency trends in the absence of the severe traffic reduction for each year from 2022 to 2024 which is due to the changed circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

(41)

With reference to recitals 31 and 32, the Commission recalls that Latvia’s service unit forecast for RP3 has been revised significantly downwards as a consequence of the traffic changes resulting from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. It is therefore necessary and appropriate to examine, for the purpose of the assessment criteria examined in recitals 39 and 40, whether Latvia would meet the Union-wide cost-efficiency trends in the absence of the severe traffic reduction for each year from 2022 to 2024 which is due to the changed circumstances.

| (42) | To this end, the Commission has recalculated Latvia’s DUC trend over RP3 and Latvia’s long-term DUC trend over RP2 and RP3 by making use of the Eurocontrol STATFOR base traffic forecast of October 2021. This recalculation results in an adjusted DUC trend for Latvia of -6,5 % over RP3 and in an adjusted long-term en route DUC trend for Latvia of -4,7 % over RP2 and RP3. Both of those adjusted trends are significantly below the corresponding Union-wide DUC trends of +1,0 % and -1,3 % respectively. Hence, Latvia fulfils the assessment criteria examined in recitals 39 and 40 in the absence of the changes in traffic caused by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

(42)

To this end, the Commission has recalculated Latvia’s DUC trend over RP3 and Latvia’s long-term DUC trend over RP2 and RP3 by making use of the Eurocontrol STATFOR base traffic forecast of October 2021. This recalculation results in an adjusted DUC trend for Latvia of -6,5 % over RP3 and in an adjusted long-term en route DUC trend for Latvia of -4,7 % over RP2 and RP3. Both of those adjusted trends are significantly below the corresponding Union-wide DUC trends of +1,0 % and -1,3 % respectively. Hence, Latvia fulfils the assessment criteria examined in recitals 39 and 40 in the absence of the changes in traffic caused by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.

en route

| (43) | Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the baseline value for the DUC of EUR 23,61 of Latvia in EUR2017 is 17,2 % lower than the average baseline value of 28,51 EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group. |
| --- | --- |

(43)

Concerning the criterion laid down in point 1.4(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317, the Commission observes that the baseline value for the DUC of EUR 23,61 of Latvia in EUR2017 is 17,2 % lower than the average baseline value of 28,51 EUR2017 of the relevant comparator group.

| (44) | The Commission acknowledges that the revised cost-efficiency targets for the charging zone of Latvia are higher than the initial targets included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. However, this deterioration is entirely due to the significantly lower traffic assumptions. When excluding the negative impact of the traffic changes resulting from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, it is clear that Latvia meets both the Union-wide DUC trend and the Union-wide long-term DUC trend. In addition, Latvia’s baseline value for 2019 is lower by a notable margin than the corresponding average value of its comparator group, which indicates that it has maintained a historically good level of cost-efficiency in relative terms. |
| --- | --- |

(44)

The Commission acknowledges that the revised cost-efficiency targets for the charging zone of Latvia are higher than the initial targets included in the draft performance plan submitted in 2021. However, this deterioration is entirely due to the significantly lower traffic assumptions. When excluding the negative impact of the traffic changes resulting from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, it is clear that Latvia meets both the Union-wide DUC trend and the Union-wide long-term DUC trend. In addition, Latvia’s baseline value for 2019 is lower by a notable margin than the corresponding average value of its comparator group, which indicates that it has maintained a historically good level of cost-efficiency in relative terms.

| (45) | Furthermore, with reference to recital 35, the Commission notes that Latvia has taken measures to mitigate the exceptional traffic circumstances by considerably reducing its determined costs for the remainder of RP3. The Commission observes that those cost containment measures are, overall, commensurate with the lower number of IFR movements forecasted for each year from 2022 to 2024, as presented in recital 32. |
| --- | --- |

(45)

Furthermore, with reference to recital 35, the Commission notes that Latvia has taken measures to mitigate the exceptional traffic circumstances by considerably reducing its determined costs for the remainder of RP3. The Commission observes that those cost containment measures are, overall, commensurate with the lower number of IFR movements forecasted for each year from 2022 to 2024, as presented in recital 32.

| (46) | On balance, the Commission therefore considers that Latvia has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its local cost-efficiency performance targets. |
| --- | --- |

(46)

On balance, the Commission therefore considers that Latvia has adequately addressed the recommendations set out in Article 3 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 with regard to the revision of its local cost-efficiency performance targets.

| (47) | On the basis of the findings in recitals 29 to 46, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency. |
| --- | --- |

(47)

On the basis of the findings in recitals 29 to 46, the targets included in the revised draft performance plan of Latvia should be considered consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency.

Review of cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

Review of cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services

| (48) | With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Articles 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Those targets were not found to raise any concerns in respect of Latvia. |
| --- | --- |

(48)

With regard to airports which fall within the scope of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 as set out in Articles 1(3) and (4) of that Regulation, the Commission has complemented its assessment of en route cost-efficiency targets by reviewing the cost-efficiency targets for terminal air navigation services in accordance with point 2.1(c) of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317. Those targets were not found to raise any concerns in respect of Latvia.

en route

CONCLUSIONS

CONCLUSIONS

| (49) | In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission has found that the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets, |
| --- | --- |

(49)

In the light of all the foregoing, the Commission has found that the performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The performance targets contained in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, and listed in the Annex to this Decision, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period set out in Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Latvia.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2022.

For the Commission

Adina-Ioana VĂLEAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 of 11 February 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 (OJ L 56, 25.2.2019, p. 1).

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 of 29 May 2019 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period starting on 1 January 2020 and ending on 31 December 2024 (OJ L 144, 3.6.2019, p. 49).

3

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1627 of 3 November 2020 on exceptional measures for the third reference period (2020-2024) of the single European sky performance and charging scheme due to COVID-19 pandemic (OJ L 366, 4.11.2020, p. 7).

4

(5)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/891 of 2 June 2021 setting revised Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network for the third reference period (2020-2024) and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/903 (OJ L 195, 3.6.2021, p. 3).

5

(6)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/728 of 13 April 2022 on the inconsistency of certain performance targets contained in the draft national and functional airspace block performance plans submitted by Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Romania, and Sweden pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period and setting out recommendations for the revision of those targets (OJ L 135, 12.5.2022, p. 4).

6

---

ANNEX

Performance targets included in the revised draft performance plan submitted by Latvia pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the third reference period

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY

Effectiveness of safety management

| Latvia | Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D |
| --- | --- |
| Air navigation service provider concerned | Safety management objective | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| LGS | Safety policy and objectives | C | D | D |
| Safety risk management | C | D | D |
| Safety assurance | C | D | D |
| Safety promotion | C | D | D |
| Safety culture | C | D | D |

Latvia

Targets on the effectiveness of safety management, expressed as a level of implementation, ranging from EASA level A to D

Air navigation service provider concerned

Safety management objective

2022

2023

2024

LGS

Safety policy and objectives

C

D

D

Safety risk management

C

D

D

Safety assurance

C

D

D

Safety promotion

C

D

D

Safety culture

C

D

D

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT

Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

| Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory | 1,25  % | 1,25  % | 1,25  % |

Latvia

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of environment, expressed as the average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

1,25  %

1,25  %

1,25  %

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY

Average en route ATFM delay in minutes per flight

| Latvia | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight | 0,03 | 0,03 | 0,03 |

Latvia

2022

2023

2024

Targets in the key performance area of capacity, expressed in minutes of ATFM delay per flight

0,03

0,03

0,03

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

Determined unit cost for en route air navigation services

| En route charging zone of Latvia | 2014 baseline value | 2019 baseline value | 2020 -2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices) | 27,90 EUR | 23,61 EUR | 40,07 EUR | 38,04 EUR | 35,62 EUR | 33,59 EUR |

En route charging zone of Latvia

2014 baseline value

2019 baseline value

2020 -2021

2022

2023

2024

Revised en route cost-efficiency targets, expressed as determined en route unit cost (in real terms in 2017 prices)

27,90 EUR

23,61 EUR

40,07 EUR

38,04 EUR

35,62 EUR

33,59 EUR

---

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/157 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/157

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2022/2427

of 6 December 2022

establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions, for common waste gas management and treatment systems in the chemical sector

(notified under document C(2022) 8788)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (1), and in particular Article 13(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions are the reference for setting permit conditions for installations covered by Chapter II of Directive 2010/75/EU and competent authorities should set emission limit values which ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed the emission levels associated with the best available techniques as laid down in the BAT conclusions. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions are the reference for setting permit conditions for installations covered by Chapter II of Directive 2010/75/EU and competent authorities should set emission limit values which ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed the emission levels associated with the best available techniques as laid down in the BAT conclusions.

| (2) | In accordance with Article 13(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU, the forum composed of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection, established by Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 (2), provided the Commission on 11 May 2022 with its opinion on the proposed content of the BAT reference document for common waste gas management and treatment systems in the chemical sector. That opinion is publicly available (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Article 13(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU, the forum composed of representatives of Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection, established by Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 (2), provided the Commission on 11 May 2022 with its opinion on the proposed content of the BAT reference document for common waste gas management and treatment systems in the chemical sector. That opinion is publicly available (3).

| (3) | The BAT conclusions set out in the Annex to this Decision take into account the opinion of the forum on the proposed content of the BAT reference document. They contain the key elements of the BAT reference document. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The BAT conclusions set out in the Annex to this Decision take into account the opinion of the forum on the proposed content of the BAT reference document. They contain the key elements of the BAT reference document.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 75(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The best available techniques (BAT) conclusions for the common waste gas management and treatment systems in the chemical sector, as set out in the Annex, are adopted.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2022.

For the Commission

Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.

1

(2)  Commission Decision of 16 May 2011 establishing a forum for the exchange of information pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (OJ C 146, 17.5.2011, p. 3).

2

(3)  https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/06f33a94-9829-4eee-b187-21bb783a0fbf/library/acce74d3-4314-43f8-937b-9bbc594a16ef?p=1&n=10&sort=modified_DESC

3

---

ANNEX

1.   Best Available Techniques (BAT) conclusions for Common Waste Gas Management and Treatment Systems in the Chemical Sector

SCOPE

These BAT conclusions concern the following activity specified in Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU: 4. Chemical industry (i.e. all production processes included in the categories of activities listed in points 4.1 to 4.6 of Annex I, unless specified otherwise).

More specifically, these BAT conclusions focus on emissions to air from the aforementioned activity.

These BAT conclusions do not address the following:

| 1. | Emissions to air from the production of chlorine, hydrogen, and sodium/potassium hydroxide by the electrolysis of brine. This is covered by the BAT conclusions for the Production of Chlor-alkali (CAK). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Emissions to air from the production of chlorine, hydrogen, and sodium/potassium hydroxide by the electrolysis of brine. This is covered by the BAT conclusions for the Production of Chlor-alkali (CAK).

| 2. | Channelled emissions to air from the production of the following chemicals in continuous processes where the total production capacity of those chemicals exceeds 20 kt/yr:






  — | lower olefins using the steam cracking process; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Channelled emissions to air from the production of the following chemicals in continuous processes where the total production capacity of those chemicals exceeds 20 kt/yr:

—

lower olefins using the steam cracking process;

| — | formaldehyde; |
| --- | --- |

—

formaldehyde;

| — | ethylene oxide and ethylene glycols; |
| --- | --- |

—

ethylene oxide and ethylene glycols;

| — | phenol from cumene; |
| --- | --- |

—

phenol from cumene;

| — | dinitrotoluene from toluene, toluene diamine from dinitrotoluene, toluene diisocyanate from toluene diamine, methylene diphenyl diamine from aniline, methylene diphenyl diisocyanate from methylene diphenyl diamine; |
| --- | --- |

—

dinitrotoluene from toluene, toluene diamine from dinitrotoluene, toluene diisocyanate from toluene diamine, methylene diphenyl diamine from aniline, methylene diphenyl diisocyanate from methylene diphenyl diamine;

| — | ethylene dichloride (EDC) and vinyl chloride monomer (VCM); |
| --- | --- |

—

ethylene dichloride (EDC) and vinyl chloride monomer (VCM);

| — | hydrogen peroxide. |
| --- | --- |

—

hydrogen peroxide.

This is covered by the BAT conclusions for the Production of Large Volume Organic Chemicals (LVOC).

However, channelled emissions to air of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and carbon monoxide (CO) from thermal treatment of waste gases originating from the aforementioned production processes are included in the scope of these BAT conclusions.

| 3. | Emissions to air from the production of the following inorganic chemicals:






  — | ammonia; |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

Emissions to air from the production of the following inorganic chemicals:

—

ammonia;

| — | ammonium nitrate; |
| --- | --- |

—

ammonium nitrate;

| — | calcium ammonium nitrate; |
| --- | --- |

—

calcium ammonium nitrate;

| — | calcium carbide; |
| --- | --- |

—

calcium carbide;

| — | calcium chloride; |
| --- | --- |

—

calcium chloride;

| — | calcium nitrate; |
| --- | --- |

—

calcium nitrate;

| — | carbon black; |
| --- | --- |

—

carbon black;

| — | ferrous chloride; |
| --- | --- |

—

ferrous chloride;

| — | ferrous sulphate (i.e. copperas and related products, such as chloro-sulphates); |
| --- | --- |

—

ferrous sulphate (i.e. copperas and related products, such as chloro-sulphates);

| — | hydrofluoric acid; |
| --- | --- |

—

hydrofluoric acid;

| — | inorganic phosphates; |
| --- | --- |

—

inorganic phosphates;

| — | nitric acid; |
| --- | --- |

—

nitric acid;

| — | nitrogen-, phosphorus- or potassium-based fertilisers (simple or compound fertilisers); |
| --- | --- |

—

nitrogen-, phosphorus- or potassium-based fertilisers (simple or compound fertilisers);

| — | phosphoric acid; |
| --- | --- |

—

phosphoric acid;

| — | precipitated calcium carbonate; |
| --- | --- |

—

precipitated calcium carbonate;

| — | sodium carbonate (i.e. soda ash); |
| --- | --- |

—

sodium carbonate (i.e. soda ash);

| — | sodium chlorate; |
| --- | --- |

—

sodium chlorate;

| — | sodium silicate; |
| --- | --- |

—

sodium silicate;

| — | sulphuric acid; |
| --- | --- |

—

sulphuric acid;

| — | synthetic amorphous silica; |
| --- | --- |

—

synthetic amorphous silica;

| — | titanium dioxide and related products; |
| --- | --- |

—

titanium dioxide and related products;

| — | urea; |
| --- | --- |

—

urea;

| — | urea-ammonium nitrate. |
| --- | --- |

—

urea-ammonium nitrate.

This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for the Production of Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals (LVIC).

| 4. | Emissions to air from steam reforming as well as from the physical purification and reconcentration of spent sulphuric acid, provided that these processes are directly associated with a production process listed under the aforementioned points 2 or 3. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Emissions to air from steam reforming as well as from the physical purification and reconcentration of spent sulphuric acid, provided that these processes are directly associated with a production process listed under the aforementioned points 2 or 3.

| 5. | Emissions to air from the production of magnesium oxide using the dry process route. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for the Production of Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide (CLM). |
| --- | --- |

5.

Emissions to air from the production of magnesium oxide using the dry process route. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for the Production of Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide (CLM).

| 6. | Emissions to air from the following:






  — | Combustion units other than process furnaces/heaters. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Large Combustion Plants (LCP), the BAT conclusions for the Refining of Mineral Oil and Gas (REF) and/or by Directive (EU) 2015/2193 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). |
| --- | --- | --- |

6.

Emissions to air from the following:

—

Combustion units other than process furnaces/heaters. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Large Combustion Plants (LCP), the BAT conclusions for the Refining of Mineral Oil and Gas (REF) and/or by Directive (EU) 2015/2193 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).

| — | Process furnaces/heaters with a total rated thermal input below 1 MW. |
| --- | --- |

—

Process furnaces/heaters with a total rated thermal input below 1 MW.

| — | Process furnaces/heaters used in lower olefins, ethylene dichloride and/or vinyl chloride monomer production referred to in point 2 above. This is covered by the BAT conclusions for the production of Large Volume Organic Chemicals (LVOC). |
| --- | --- |

—

Process furnaces/heaters used in lower olefins, ethylene dichloride and/or vinyl chloride monomer production referred to in point 2 above. This is covered by the BAT conclusions for the production of Large Volume Organic Chemicals (LVOC).

| 7. | Emissions to air from waste incineration plants. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Waste Incineration (WI). |
| --- | --- |

7.

Emissions to air from waste incineration plants. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Waste Incineration (WI).

| 8. | Emissions to air from the storage, transfer and handling of liquids, liquefied gases and solids, where these are not directly associated with the activity specified in Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU: 4. Chemical industry. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Emissions from Storage (EFS).
  However, emissions to air from the storage, transfer and handling of liquids, liquefied gases and solids are included in the scope of these BAT conclusions provided that these processes are directly associated with the chemical production process specified in the scope of these BAT conclusions. |
| --- | --- |

8.

Emissions to air from the storage, transfer and handling of liquids, liquefied gases and solids, where these are not directly associated with the activity specified in Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU: 4. Chemical industry. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Emissions from Storage (EFS).

However, emissions to air from the storage, transfer and handling of liquids, liquefied gases and solids are included in the scope of these BAT conclusions provided that these processes are directly associated with the chemical production process specified in the scope of these BAT conclusions.

| 9. | Emissions to air from indirect cooling systems. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Industrial Cooling Systems (ICS). |
| --- | --- |

9.

Emissions to air from indirect cooling systems. This may be covered by the BAT conclusions for Industrial Cooling Systems (ICS).

Other BAT conclusions which are complementary for the activities covered by these BAT conclusions include Common Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector (CWW).

Other BAT conclusions and reference documents which could be relevant for the activities covered by these BAT conclusions are the following:

| — | Production of Chlor-alkali (CAK); |
| --- | --- |

—

Production of Chlor-alkali (CAK);

| — | Manufacture of Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Ammonia, Acids and Fertilisers (LVIC-AAF); |
| --- | --- |

—

Manufacture of Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Ammonia, Acids and Fertilisers (LVIC-AAF);

| — | Manufacture of Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Solids and Others Industry (LVIC-S); |
| --- | --- |

—

Manufacture of Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Solids and Others Industry (LVIC-S);

| — | Production of Large Volume Organic Chemicals (LVOC); |
| --- | --- |

—

Production of Large Volume Organic Chemicals (LVOC);

| — | Manufacture of Organic Fine Chemicals (OFC); |
| --- | --- |

—

Manufacture of Organic Fine Chemicals (OFC);

| — | Production of Polymers (POL); |
| --- | --- |

—

Production of Polymers (POL);

| — | Production of Speciality Inorganic Chemicals (SIC); |
| --- | --- |

—

Production of Speciality Inorganic Chemicals (SIC);

| — | Refining of Mineral Oil and Gas (REF); |
| --- | --- |

—

Refining of Mineral Oil and Gas (REF);

| — | Economics and Cross-media Effects (ECM); |
| --- | --- |

—

Economics and Cross-media Effects (ECM);

| — | Emissions from Storage (EFS); |
| --- | --- |

—

Emissions from Storage (EFS);

| — | Energy Efficiency (ENE); |
| --- | --- |

—

Energy Efficiency (ENE);

| — | Industrial Cooling Systems (ICS); |
| --- | --- |

—

Industrial Cooling Systems (ICS);

| — | Large Combustion Plants (LCP); |
| --- | --- |

—

Large Combustion Plants (LCP);

| — | Monitoring of Emissions to Air and Water from IED installations (ROM); |
| --- | --- |

—

Monitoring of Emissions to Air and Water from IED installations (ROM);

| — | Waste Incineration (WI); |
| --- | --- |

—

Waste Incineration (WI);

| — | Waste Treatment (WT). |
| --- | --- |

—

Waste Treatment (WT).

These BAT conclusions apply without prejudice to other relevant legislation, e.g. on the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) or on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP).

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, the following definitions apply:

| General terms |
| --- |
| Term used | Definition |
| Channelled emissions to air | Emissions of pollutants to air through an emission point such as a stack. |
| Combustion unit | Any technical apparatus in which fuels are oxidised in order to use the heat thus generated. Combustion units include boilers, engines, turbines and process furnaces/heaters, but do not include thermal or catalytic oxidisers. |
| Complex inorganic pigments | A stable crystal lattice of different metal cations. The most important host-lattices are rutile, spinel, zircon, and haematite/corundum, but other stable structures exist. |
| Continuous measurement | Measurement using an automated measuring system permanently installed on site. |
| Continuous process | A process in which the raw materials are fed continuously into the reactor with the reaction products then fed into connected downstream separation and/or recovery units. |
| Diffuse emissions | Non-channelled emissions to air. Diffuse emissions include fugitive and non-fugitive emissions. |
| Emissions to air | Generic term for emissions of pollutants to air including both channelled and diffuse emissions. |
| Ethanolamines | Collective term for monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine, or mixtures thereof. |
| Ethylene glycols | Collective term for monoethylene glycol, diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol, or mixtures thereof. |
| Existing plant | A plant that is not a new plant. |
| Existing process furnace/heater | A process furnace/heater that is not a new process furnace/heater. |
| Flue-gas | The exhaust gas exiting a combustion unit. |
| Fugitive emissions | Non-channelled emissions to air caused by loss of tightness of equipment which is designed or assembled to be tight.
  Fugitive emissions can arise from:






  — | moving equipment, such as agitators, compressors, pumps, valves (manual and automatic); |

General terms

Term used

Definition

Channelled emissions to air

Emissions of pollutants to air through an emission point such as a stack.

Combustion unit

Any technical apparatus in which fuels are oxidised in order to use the heat thus generated. Combustion units include boilers, engines, turbines and process furnaces/heaters, but do not include thermal or catalytic oxidisers.

Complex inorganic pigments

A stable crystal lattice of different metal cations. The most important host-lattices are rutile, spinel, zircon, and haematite/corundum, but other stable structures exist.

Continuous measurement

Measurement using an automated measuring system permanently installed on site.

Continuous process

A process in which the raw materials are fed continuously into the reactor with the reaction products then fed into connected downstream separation and/or recovery units.

Diffuse emissions

Non-channelled emissions to air. Diffuse emissions include fugitive and non-fugitive emissions.

Emissions to air

Generic term for emissions of pollutants to air including both channelled and diffuse emissions.

Ethanolamines

Collective term for monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine, or mixtures thereof.

Ethylene glycols

Collective term for monoethylene glycol, diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol, or mixtures thereof.

Existing plant

A plant that is not a new plant.

Existing process furnace/heater

A process furnace/heater that is not a new process furnace/heater.

Flue-gas

The exhaust gas exiting a combustion unit.

Fugitive emissions

Non-channelled emissions to air caused by loss of tightness of equipment which is designed or assembled to be tight.

Fugitive emissions can arise from:

—

moving equipment, such as agitators, compressors, pumps, valves (manual and automatic);

| — | static equipment, such as flanges and other connections, open-ended lines, sampling points. |
| --- | --- |

—

static equipment, such as flanges and other connections, open-ended lines, sampling points.

Lower olefins

Collective term for ethylene, propylene, butylene and butadiene, or mixtures thereof.

Major plant upgrade

A major change in the design or technology of a plant with major adjustments or replacements of the process and/or abatement units and associated equipment.

Mass flow

The mass of a given substance or parameter which is emitted over a defined period of time.

New plant

A plant first permitted on the site of the installation following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete replacement of a plant following the publication of these BAT conclusions.

New process furnace/heater

A process furnace/heater in a plant first permitted following the publication of these BAT conclusions or a complete replacement of a process furnace/heater following the publication of these BAT conclusions.

Non-fugitive emissions

Diffuse emissions other than fugitive emissions.

Non-fugitive emissions may arise from, for example, atmospheric vents, bulk storage, loading/unloading systems, vessels and tanks (on opening), open gutters, sampling systems, tank venting, waste, sewers and water treatment plants.

NOX precursors

Nitrogen-containing compounds (e.g. acrylonitrile, ammonia, nitrous gases, nitrogen-containing organic compounds) in the input to thermal or catalytic oxidation that lead to NOX emissions. Elemental nitrogen is not included.

Operational constraint

Limitation or restriction connected, for example, to:

| — | substances used (e.g. substances that cannot be substituted, very corrosive substances); |
| --- | --- |

—

substances used (e.g. substances that cannot be substituted, very corrosive substances);

| — | operating conditions (e.g. very high temperature or pressure); |
| --- | --- |

—

operating conditions (e.g. very high temperature or pressure);

| — | the functioning of the plant; |
| --- | --- |

—

the functioning of the plant;

| — | resource availability (e.g. availability of spare parts when replacing a piece of equipment, availability of qualified manpower); |
| --- | --- |

—

resource availability (e.g. availability of spare parts when replacing a piece of equipment, availability of qualified manpower);

| — | expected environmental benefits (e.g. giving priority to maintenance, repair or replacement actions with the highest environmental benefit). |
| --- | --- |

—

expected environmental benefits (e.g. giving priority to maintenance, repair or replacement actions with the highest environmental benefit).

Periodic measurement

Measurement at specified time intervals using manual or automated methods.

Polymer grade

For each type of polymer, there are different product qualities (i.e. grades) which vary in structure and molecular mass, and are optimised for specific applications. In the case of polyolefins, these may vary regarding the use of co-polymers such as EVA. In the case of PVC, they may vary in the average length of the polymer chain and in the porosity of the particles.

Process furnace/heater

Process furnaces or heaters are:

| — | combustion units used for the treatment of objects or feed material through direct contact, e.g. in drying processes or chemical reactors; or |
| --- | --- |

—

combustion units used for the treatment of objects or feed material through direct contact, e.g. in drying processes or chemical reactors; or

| — | combustion units whose radiant and/or conductive heat is transferred to objects or feed material through a solid wall without using an intermediary heat transfer fluid, e.g. furnaces or reactors heating a process stream used in the (petro-)chemical industry. |
| --- | --- |

—

combustion units whose radiant and/or conductive heat is transferred to objects or feed material through a solid wall without using an intermediary heat transfer fluid, e.g. furnaces or reactors heating a process stream used in the (petro-)chemical industry.

As a consequence of the application of good energy recovery practices, some of the process furnaces/heaters may have an associated steam/electricity generation system. This is an integral design feature of the process furnace/heater that cannot be considered in isolation.

Process off-gas

The gas leaving a process which is further treated for recovery and/or abatement.

Solvent

Organic solvent as defined in Article 3(46) of Directive 2010/75/EU.

Solvent consumption

Consumption of solvent as defined in Article 57(9) of Directive 2010/75/EU.

Solvent input

The total quantity of organic solvents used as defined in Part 7 of Annex VII to Directive 2010/75/EU.

Solvent mass balance

A mass balance exercise conducted at least on an annual basis according to Part 7 of Annex VII to Directive 2010/75/EU.

Thermal treatment

Treatment of waste gases using thermal or catalytic oxidation.

Total emissions

The sum of channelled and diffuse emissions.

Valid hourly (or half-hourly) average

An hourly (or half-hourly) average is considered valid when there is no maintenance or malfunction of the automated measuring system.

| Substances/Parameters |
| --- |
| Term used | Definition |
| Cl2 | Elemental chlorine. |
| CO | Carbon monoxide. |
| CS2 | Carbon disulphide. |
| Dust | Total particulate matter (in air). Unless specified otherwise, dust includes PM2,5 and PM10. |
| EDC | Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane). |
| HCl | Hydrogen chloride. |
| HCN | Hydrogen cyanide. |
| HF | Hydrogen fluoride. |
| H2S | Hydrogen sulphide. |
| NH3 | Ammonia. |
| Ni | Nickel. |
| N2O | Dinitrogen oxide (also referred to as nitrous oxide). |
| NOX | The sum of nitrogen monoxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), expressed as NO2. |
| Pb | Lead. |
| PCDD/F | Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and -furans. |
| PM2,5 | Particulate matter which passes through a size-selective inlet with a 50 % efficiency cut-off at 2,5 μm aerodynamic diameter as defined in Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2). |
| PM10 | Particulate matter which passes through a size-selective inlet with a 50 % efficiency cut-off at 10 μm aerodynamic diameter as defined in Directive 2008/50/EC. |
| SO2 | Sulphur dioxide. |
| SOX | The sum of sulphur dioxide (SO2), sulphur trioxide (SO3), and sulphuric acid aerosols, expressed as SO2. |
| TVOC | Total volatile organic carbon, expressed as C. |
| VCM | Vinyl chloride monomer. |
| VOC | Volatile organic compound as defined in Article 3(45) of Directive 2010/75/EU. |

Substances/Parameters

Term used

Definition

Cl2

Elemental chlorine.

CO

Carbon monoxide.

CS2

Carbon disulphide.

Dust

Total particulate matter (in air). Unless specified otherwise, dust includes PM2,5 and PM10.

EDC

Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane).

HCl

Hydrogen chloride.

HCN

Hydrogen cyanide.

HF

Hydrogen fluoride.

H2S

Hydrogen sulphide.

NH3

Ammonia.

Ni

Nickel.

N2O

Dinitrogen oxide (also referred to as nitrous oxide).

NOX

The sum of nitrogen monoxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), expressed as NO2.

Pb

Lead.

PCDD/F

Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and -furans.

PM2,5

Particulate matter which passes through a size-selective inlet with a 50 % efficiency cut-off at 2,5 μm aerodynamic diameter as defined in Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2).

PM10

Particulate matter which passes through a size-selective inlet with a 50 % efficiency cut-off at 10 μm aerodynamic diameter as defined in Directive 2008/50/EC.

SO2

Sulphur dioxide.

SOX

The sum of sulphur dioxide (SO2), sulphur trioxide (SO3), and sulphuric acid aerosols, expressed as SO2.

TVOC

Total volatile organic carbon, expressed as C.

VCM

Vinyl chloride monomer.

VOC

Volatile organic compound as defined in Article 3(45) of Directive 2010/75/EU.

ACRONYMS

For the purposes of these BAT conclusions, the following acronyms apply:

| Acronym | Definition |
| --- | --- |
| CLP | Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. |
| CMR | Carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction. |
| CMR 1A | CMR substance of category 1A as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as amended, i.e. carrying the hazard statements H340, H350, H360. |
| CMR 1B | CMR substance of category 1B as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as amended, i.e. carrying the hazard statements H340, H350, H360. |
| CMR 2 | CMR substance of category 2 as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as amended, i.e. carrying the hazard statements H341, H351, H361. |
| DIAL | Differential absorption LIDAR. |
| EMS | Environmental Management System. |
| EPS | Expandable polystyrene. |
| E-PVC | PVC produced by emulsion polymerisation. |
| EVA | Ethylene-vinyl acetate. |
| GPPS | General-purpose polystyrene. |
| HDPE | High-density polyethylene. |
| HEAF | High-efficiency air filter. |
| HEPA | High-efficiency particle air. |
| HIPS | High-impact polystyrene. |
| IED | Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions. |
| I-TEQ | International toxic equivalent – derived by using the equivalence factors in Part 2 of Annex VI to Directive 2010/75/EU. |
| LDAR | Leak detection and repair. |
| LDPE | Low-density polyethylene. |
| LIDAR | Light detection and ranging. |
| LLDPE | Linear low-density polyethylene. |
| OGI | Optical gas imaging. |
| OTNOC | Other than normal operating conditions. |
| PP | Polypropylene. |
| PVC | Polyvinyl chloride. |
| REACH | Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals. |
| SCR | Selective catalytic reduction. |
| SNCR | Selective non-catalytic reduction. |
| SOF | Solar occultation flux. |
| S-PVC | PVC produced by suspension polymerisation. |
| ULPA | Ultra-low penetration air. |

Acronym

Definition

CLP

Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures.

CMR

Carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction.

CMR 1A

CMR substance of category 1A as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as amended, i.e. carrying the hazard statements H340, H350, H360.

CMR 1B

CMR substance of category 1B as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as amended, i.e. carrying the hazard statements H340, H350, H360.

CMR 2

CMR substance of category 2 as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as amended, i.e. carrying the hazard statements H341, H351, H361.

DIAL

Differential absorption LIDAR.

EMS

Environmental Management System.

EPS

Expandable polystyrene.

E-PVC

PVC produced by emulsion polymerisation.

EVA

Ethylene-vinyl acetate.

GPPS

General-purpose polystyrene.

HDPE

High-density polyethylene.

HEAF

High-efficiency air filter.

HEPA

High-efficiency particle air.

HIPS

High-impact polystyrene.

IED

Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions.

I-TEQ

International toxic equivalent – derived by using the equivalence factors in Part 2 of Annex VI to Directive 2010/75/EU.

LDAR

Leak detection and repair.

LDPE

Low-density polyethylene.

LIDAR

Light detection and ranging.

LLDPE

Linear low-density polyethylene.

OGI

Optical gas imaging.

OTNOC

Other than normal operating conditions.

PP

Polypropylene.

PVC

Polyvinyl chloride.

REACH

Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals.

SCR

Selective catalytic reduction.

SNCR

Selective non-catalytic reduction.

SOF

Solar occultation flux.

S-PVC

PVC produced by suspension polymerisation.

ULPA

Ultra-low penetration air.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Best Available Techniques

The techniques listed and described in these BAT conclusions are neither prescriptive nor exhaustive. Other techniques may be used that ensure at least an equivalent level of environmental protection.

Unless otherwise stated, the BAT conclusions are generally applicable.

Emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT-AELs) and indicative emission levels for channelled emissions to air

The BAT-AELs and the indicative emission levels for channelled emissions to air given in these BAT conclusions refer to values of concentration, expressed as mass of emitted substance per volume of waste gas under standard conditions (dry gas at a temperature of 273,15 K, and a pressure of 101,3 kPa) and expressed in the unit mg/Nm3, μg/Nm3 or ng I-TEQ/Nm3.

The reference oxygen levels used to express BAT-AELs and indicative emission levels in these BAT conclusions are shown in the table below.

| Source of emissions | Reference oxygen level (OR) |
| --- | --- |
| Process furnace/heater using indirect heating | 3 dry vol-% |
| All other sources | No correction for the oxygen level |

Source of emissions

Reference oxygen level (OR)

Process furnace/heater using indirect heating

3 dry vol-%

All other sources

No correction for the oxygen level

For the cases where a reference oxygen level is given, the equation for calculating the emission concentration at the reference oxygen level is:

Formula

where:

| ER | : | emission concentration at the reference oxygen level OR; |
| --- | --- | --- |
| OR | : | reference oxygen level in vol-%; |
| EM | : | measured emission concentration; |
| OM | : | measured oxygen level in vol-%. |

ER

:

emission concentration at the reference oxygen level OR;

OR

:

reference oxygen level in vol-%;

EM

:

measured emission concentration;

OM

:

measured oxygen level in vol-%.

The equation above does not apply if the process furnace(s)/heater(s) use(s) oxygen-enriched air or pure oxygen or when additional air intake for safety reasons brings the oxygen level in the waste gas very close to 21 vol-%. In this case, the emission concentration at the reference oxygen level of 3 dry vol-% is calculated differently.

For averaging periods of BAT-AELs and indicative emission levels for channelled emissions to air, the following definitions apply.

| Type of measurement | Averaging period | Definition |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Continuous | Daily average | Average over a period of 1 day based on valid hourly or half-hourly averages. |
| Periodic | Average over the sampling period | Average value of three consecutive samplings/measurements of at least 30 minutes each (5). |

Type of measurement

Averaging period

Definition

Continuous

Daily average

Average over a period of 1 day based on valid hourly or half-hourly averages.

Periodic

Average over the sampling period

Average value of three consecutive samplings/measurements of at least 30 minutes each (5).

For the purpose of calculating the mass flows in relation to BAT 11 (Table 1.1), BAT 14 (Table 1.3), BAT 18 (Table 1.6), BAT 29 (Table 1.9) and BAT 36 (Table 1.15), where waste gases with similar characteristics, e.g. containing the same (type of) substances/parameters, and discharged through two or more separate stacks could, in the judgement of the competent authority, be discharged through a common stack, these stacks shall be considered as a single stack.

BAT-AELs for diffuse VOC emissions to air

For diffuse VOC emissions from the use of solvents or the reuse of recovered solvents, the BAT-AELs in these BAT conclusions are given as a percentage of the solvent input, calculated on an annual basis according to Part 7 of Annex VII to Directive 2010/75/EU.

BAT-AELs for total emissions to air for the production of polymers or synthetic rubbers

Production of polyolefins or synthetic rubbers

For total emissions to air of VOCs from the production of polyolefins or synthetic rubbers, the BAT-AELs in these BAT conclusions are given as specific emission loads calculated on an annual basis by dividing the total VOC emissions by a sector-dependent production rate, expressed in the unit g C/kg of product.

Production of PVC

For total emissions to air of VCM from the production of PVC, the BAT-AELs in these BAT conclusions are given as specific emission loads calculated on an annual basis by dividing the total VCM emissions by a sector-dependent production rate, expressed in the unit g/kg of product.

For the purpose of calculating specific emission loads, total emissions include the VCM concentration in the PVC.

Production of viscose

For the production of viscose, the BAT-AEL in these BAT conclusions is given as a specific emission load calculated on an annual basis by dividing the total S emissions by the production rate of staple fibres or casing, expressed in the unit g S/kg of product.

1.1.   
  General BAT conclusions

1.1.1.   Environmental management systems

BAT 1.   In order to improve the overall environmental performance, BAT is to elaborate and implement an environmental management system (EMS) that incorporates all of the following features:

| i. | commitment, leadership, and accountability of the management, including senior management, for the implementation of an effective EMS; |
| --- | --- |

i.

commitment, leadership, and accountability of the management, including senior management, for the implementation of an effective EMS;

| ii. | an analysis that includes the determination of the organisation’s context, the identification of the needs and expectations of interested parties, the identification of characteristics of the installation that are associated with possible risks for the environment (or human health) as well as of the applicable legal requirements relating to the environment; |
| --- | --- |

ii.

an analysis that includes the determination of the organisation’s context, the identification of the needs and expectations of interested parties, the identification of characteristics of the installation that are associated with possible risks for the environment (or human health) as well as of the applicable legal requirements relating to the environment;

| iii. | development of an environmental policy that includes the continuous improvement of the environmental performance of the installation; |
| --- | --- |

iii.

development of an environmental policy that includes the continuous improvement of the environmental performance of the installation;

| iv. | establishing objectives and performance indicators in relation to significant environmental aspects, including safeguarding compliance with applicable legal requirements; |
| --- | --- |

iv.

establishing objectives and performance indicators in relation to significant environmental aspects, including safeguarding compliance with applicable legal requirements;

| v. | planning and implementing the necessary procedures and actions (including corrective and preventive actions where needed), to achieve the environmental objectives and avoid environmental risks; |
| --- | --- |

v.

planning and implementing the necessary procedures and actions (including corrective and preventive actions where needed), to achieve the environmental objectives and avoid environmental risks;

| vi. | determination of structures, roles and responsibilities in relation to environmental aspects and objectives and provision of the financial and human resources needed; |
| --- | --- |

vi.

determination of structures, roles and responsibilities in relation to environmental aspects and objectives and provision of the financial and human resources needed;

| vii. | ensuring the necessary competence and awareness of staff whose work may affect the environmental performance of the installation (e.g. by providing information and training); |
| --- | --- |

vii.

ensuring the necessary competence and awareness of staff whose work may affect the environmental performance of the installation (e.g. by providing information and training);

| viii. | internal and external communication; |
| --- | --- |

viii.

internal and external communication;

| ix. | fostering employee involvement in good environmental management practices; |
| --- | --- |

ix.

fostering employee involvement in good environmental management practices;

| x. | establishing and maintaining a management manual and written procedures to control activities with significant environmental impact as well as relevant records; |
| --- | --- |

x.

establishing and maintaining a management manual and written procedures to control activities with significant environmental impact as well as relevant records;

| xi. | effective operational planning and process control; |
| --- | --- |

xi.

effective operational planning and process control;

| xii. | implementation of appropriate maintenance programmes; |
| --- | --- |

xii.

implementation of appropriate maintenance programmes;

| xiii. | emergency preparedness and response protocols, including the prevention and/or mitigation of the adverse (environmental) impacts of emergency situations; |
| --- | --- |

xiii.

emergency preparedness and response protocols, including the prevention and/or mitigation of the adverse (environmental) impacts of emergency situations;

| xiv. | when (re)designing a (new) installation or a part thereof, consideration of its environmental impacts throughout its life, which includes construction, maintenance, operation and decommissioning; |
| --- | --- |

xiv.

when (re)designing a (new) installation or a part thereof, consideration of its environmental impacts throughout its life, which includes construction, maintenance, operation and decommissioning;

| xv. | implementation of a monitoring and measurement programme; if necessary, information can be found in the Reference Report on Monitoring of Emissions to Air and Water from IED Installations; |
| --- | --- |

xv.

implementation of a monitoring and measurement programme; if necessary, information can be found in the Reference Report on Monitoring of Emissions to Air and Water from IED Installations;

| xvi. | application of sectoral benchmarking on a regular basis; |
| --- | --- |

xvi.

application of sectoral benchmarking on a regular basis;

| xvii. | periodic independent (as far as practicable) internal auditing and periodic independent external auditing in order to assess the environmental performance and to determine whether or not the EMS conforms to planned arrangements and has been properly implemented and maintained; |
| --- | --- |

xvii.

periodic independent (as far as practicable) internal auditing and periodic independent external auditing in order to assess the environmental performance and to determine whether or not the EMS conforms to planned arrangements and has been properly implemented and maintained;

| xviii. | evaluation of causes of nonconformities, implementation of corrective actions in response to nonconformities, review of the effectiveness of corrective actions, and determination of whether similar nonconformities exist or could potentially occur; |
| --- | --- |

xviii.

evaluation of causes of nonconformities, implementation of corrective actions in response to nonconformities, review of the effectiveness of corrective actions, and determination of whether similar nonconformities exist or could potentially occur;

| xix. | periodic review, by senior management, of the EMS and its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness; |
| --- | --- |

xix.

periodic review, by senior management, of the EMS and its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness;

| xx. | following and taking into account the development of cleaner techniques. |
| --- | --- |

xx.

following and taking into account the development of cleaner techniques.

Specifically for the chemical sector, BAT is also to incorporate the following features in the EMS:

| xxi. | an inventory of channelled and diffuse emissions to air (see BAT 2); |
| --- | --- |

xxi.

an inventory of channelled and diffuse emissions to air (see BAT 2);

| xxii. | an OTNOC management plan for emissions to air (see BAT 3); |
| --- | --- |

xxii.

an OTNOC management plan for emissions to air (see BAT 3);

| xxiii. | an integrated waste gas management and treatment strategy for channelled emissions to air (see BAT 4); |
| --- | --- |

xxiii.

an integrated waste gas management and treatment strategy for channelled emissions to air (see BAT 4);

| xxiv. | a management system for diffuse VOC emissions to air (see BAT 19); |
| --- | --- |

xxiv.

a management system for diffuse VOC emissions to air (see BAT 19);

| xxv. | a chemicals management system that includes an inventory of the hazardous substances and substances of very high concern used in the process(es); the potential for substitution of the substances that are listed in this inventory, focusing on those substances other than raw materials, is analysed periodically (e.g. annually) in order to identify possible new available and safer alternatives, with no or lower environmental impacts. |
| --- | --- |

xxv.

a chemicals management system that includes an inventory of the hazardous substances and substances of very high concern used in the process(es); the potential for substitution of the substances that are listed in this inventory, focusing on those substances other than raw materials, is analysed periodically (e.g. annually) in order to identify possible new available and safer alternatives, with no or lower environmental impacts.

Note

Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6) establishes the European Union eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), which is an example of an EMS consistent with this BAT.

Applicability

The level of detail and the degree of formalisation of the EMS will generally be related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of environmental impacts it may have.

BAT 2.   In order to facilitate the reduction of emissions to air, BAT is to establish, maintain and regularly review (including when a substantial change occurs) an inventory of channelled and diffuse emissions to air, as part of the environmental management system (see BAT 1), that incorporates all of the following features:

| i. | information, as comprehensive as is reasonably possible, about the chemical production process(es), including:






  a. | chemical reaction equations, also showing side products; |
| --- | --- | --- |

i.

information, as comprehensive as is reasonably possible, about the chemical production process(es), including:

a.

chemical reaction equations, also showing side products;

| b. | simplified process flow sheets that show the origin of the emissions; |
| --- | --- |

b.

simplified process flow sheets that show the origin of the emissions;

| ii. | information, as comprehensive as is reasonably possible, about channelled emissions to air, such as:






  a. | emission point(s); |
| --- | --- | --- |

ii.

information, as comprehensive as is reasonably possible, about channelled emissions to air, such as:

a.

emission point(s);

| b. | average values and variability of flow and temperature; |
| --- | --- |

b.

average values and variability of flow and temperature;

| c. | average concentration and mass flow values of relevant substances/parameters and their variability (e.g. TVOC, CO, NOX, SOX, Cl2, HCl); |
| --- | --- |

c.

average concentration and mass flow values of relevant substances/parameters and their variability (e.g. TVOC, CO, NOX, SOX, Cl2, HCl);

| d. | presence of other substances that may affect the waste gas treatment system(s) or plant safety (e.g. oxygen, nitrogen, water vapour, dust); |
| --- | --- |

d.

presence of other substances that may affect the waste gas treatment system(s) or plant safety (e.g. oxygen, nitrogen, water vapour, dust);

| e. | techniques used to prevent and/or reduce channelled emissions to air; |
| --- | --- |

e.

techniques used to prevent and/or reduce channelled emissions to air;

| f. | flammability, lower and higher explosive limits, reactivity; |
| --- | --- |

f.

flammability, lower and higher explosive limits, reactivity;

| g. | monitoring methods (see BAT 8); |
| --- | --- |

g.

monitoring methods (see BAT 8);

| h. | presence of substances classified as CMR 1A, CMR 1B or CMR 2; the presence of such substances may for example be assessed according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP). |
| --- | --- |

h.

presence of substances classified as CMR 1A, CMR 1B or CMR 2; the presence of such substances may for example be assessed according to the criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP).

| iii. | information, as comprehensive as is reasonably possible, about diffuse emissions to air, such as:






  a. | identification of the emission source(s); |
| --- | --- | --- |

iii.

information, as comprehensive as is reasonably possible, about diffuse emissions to air, such as:

a.

identification of the emission source(s);

| b. | characteristics of each emission source (e.g. fugitive or non-fugitive; static or moving; accessibility of the emission source; included in an LDAR programme or not); |
| --- | --- |

b.

characteristics of each emission source (e.g. fugitive or non-fugitive; static or moving; accessibility of the emission source; included in an LDAR programme or not);

| c. | the characteristics of the gas or liquid in contact with the emission source(s), including:






  1. | physical state; |
| --- | --- | --- |

c.

the characteristics of the gas or liquid in contact with the emission source(s), including:

1.

physical state;

| 2. | vapour pressure of the substance(s) in the liquid, pressure of the gas; |
| --- | --- |

2.

vapour pressure of the substance(s) in the liquid, pressure of the gas;

| 3. | temperature; |
| --- | --- |

3.

temperature;

| 4. | composition (by weight for liquids or by volume for gases); |
| --- | --- |

4.

composition (by weight for liquids or by volume for gases);

| 5. | hazardous properties of the substance(s) or mixtures, including substances or mixtures classified as CMR 1A, CMR 1B or CMR 2; |
| --- | --- |

5.

hazardous properties of the substance(s) or mixtures, including substances or mixtures classified as CMR 1A, CMR 1B or CMR 2;

| d. | techniques used to prevent and/or reduce diffuse emissions to air; |
| --- | --- |

d.

techniques used to prevent and/or reduce diffuse emissions to air;

| e. | monitoring (see BAT 20, BAT 21 and BAT 22). |
| --- | --- |

e.

monitoring (see BAT 20, BAT 21 and BAT 22).

Note for diffuse emissions

The information about diffuse emissions to air is particularly relevant for activities using large amounts of organic substances or mixtures (e.g. production of pharmaceuticals, production of large volumes of organic chemicals or of polymers).

The information about fugitive emissions covers all emission sources in contact with organic substances with a vapour pressure greater than 0,3 kPa at 293,15 K.

Sources of fugitive emissions connected to pipes whose diameter is small (e.g. smaller than 12,7 mm, i.e. 0,5 inch) may be excluded from the inventory.

Equipment operated under subatmospheric pressure may be excluded from the inventory.

Applicability

The level of detail and the degree of formalisation of the inventory will generally be related to the nature, scale and complexity of the installation, and the range of environmental impacts it may have.

1.1.2.   Other than normal operating conditions (OTNOC)

BAT 3.   In order to reduce the frequency of the occurrence of OTNOC and to reduce emissions to air during OTNOC, BAT is to set up and implement a risk-based OTNOC management plan as part of the environmental management system (see BAT 1) that includes all of the following features:

| i. | identification of potential OTNOC (e.g. failure of equipment critical to the control of channelled emissions to air, or equipment critical to the prevention of accidents or incidents that could lead to emissions to air (‘critical equipment’)), of their root causes and of their potential consequences; |
| --- | --- |

i.

identification of potential OTNOC (e.g. failure of equipment critical to the control of channelled emissions to air, or equipment critical to the prevention of accidents or incidents that could lead to emissions to air (‘critical equipment’)), of their root causes and of their potential consequences;

| ii. | appropriate design of critical equipment (e.g. equipment modularity and compartmentalisation, backup systems, techniques to obviate the need to bypass waste gas treatment during start-up and shutdown, high-integrity equipment, etc.); |
| --- | --- |

ii.

appropriate design of critical equipment (e.g. equipment modularity and compartmentalisation, backup systems, techniques to obviate the need to bypass waste gas treatment during start-up and shutdown, high-integrity equipment, etc.);

| iii. | set-up and implementation of a preventive maintenance plan for critical equipment (see BAT 1 xii.); |
| --- | --- |

iii.

set-up and implementation of a preventive maintenance plan for critical equipment (see BAT 1 xii.);

| iv. | monitoring (i.e. estimating or, where this is possible, measuring) and recording of emissions and associated circumstances during OTNOC; |
| --- | --- |

iv.

monitoring (i.e. estimating or, where this is possible, measuring) and recording of emissions and associated circumstances during OTNOC;

| v. | periodic assessment of the emissions occurring during OTNOC (e.g. frequency of events, duration, amount of pollutants emitted as recorded in point iv.) and implementation of corrective actions if necessary; |
| --- | --- |

v.

periodic assessment of the emissions occurring during OTNOC (e.g. frequency of events, duration, amount of pollutants emitted as recorded in point iv.) and implementation of corrective actions if necessary;

| vi. | regular review and update of the list of identified OTNOC under point i. following the periodic assessment of point v.; |
| --- | --- |

vi.

regular review and update of the list of identified OTNOC under point i. following the periodic assessment of point v.;

| vii. | regular testing of backup systems. |
| --- | --- |

vii.

regular testing of backup systems.

1.1.3.   Channelled emissions to air

1.1.3.1.   General techniques

BAT 4.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air, BAT is to use an integrated waste gas management and treatment strategy that includes, in order of priority, process-integrated recovery and abatement techniques.

Description

The integrated waste gas management and treatment strategy is based on the inventory in BAT 2. It takes into account factors such as greenhouse gas emissions and the consumption or reuse of energy, water and materials associated with the use of the different techniques.

BAT 5.   In order to facilitate the recovery of materials and the reduction of channelled emissions to air, as well as to increase energy efficiency, BAT is to combine waste gas streams with similar characteristics, thus minimising the number of emission points.

Description

The combined treatment of waste gases with similar characteristics ensures more effective and efficient treatment compared to the separate treatment of individual waste gas streams. The combination of waste gases is carried out considering plant safety (e.g. avoiding concentrations close to the lower/upper explosive limit), technical (e.g. compatibility of the individual waste gas streams, concentration of the substances concerned), environmental (e.g. maximising recovery of materials or pollutant abatement) and economic factors (e.g. distance between different production units).

Care is taken that the combination of waste gases does not lead to the dilution of emissions.

BAT 6.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air, BAT is to ensure that the waste gas treatment systems are appropriately designed (e.g. considering the maximum flow rate and pollutant concentrations), operated within their design ranges, and maintained (through preventive, corrective, regular and unplanned maintenance) so as to ensure optimal availability, effectiveness and efficiency of the equipment.

1.1.3.2.   Monitoring

BAT 7.   BAT is to continuously monitor key process parameters (e.g. waste gas flow and temperature) of waste gas streams being sent to pretreatment and/or final treatment.

BAT 8.   BAT is to monitor channelled emissions to air with at least the frequency given below and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.

| Substance/Parameter (7) | Process(es)/Source(s) | Emission points | Standard(s) (8) | Minimum monitoring frequency | Monitoring associated with |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ammonia (NH3) | Use of SCR/SNCR | Any stack | EN 21877 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) | BAT 17 |
| All other processes/sources | BAT 18 |
| Benzene | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| 1,3-Butadiene | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Carbon monoxide (CO) | Thermal treatment | Any stack with a CO mass flow of ≥ 2 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 16 |
| Any stack with a CO mass flow of < 2 kg/h | EN 15058 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| Process furnaces/heaters | Any stack with a CO mass flow of ≥ 2 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous (12) | BAT 36 |
| Any stack with a CO mass flow of < 2 kg/h | EN 15058 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| All other processes/sources | Any stack with a CO mass flow of ≥ 2 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 18 |
| Any stack with a CO mass flow of < 2 kg/h | EN 15058 | Once every year (9)
   (13) |
| Chloromethane | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| CMR substances other than CMR substances covered elsewhere in this table (18) | All other processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Dichloromethane | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Dust | All processes/sources | Any stack with dust mass flow ≥ 3 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11),
  EN 13284-1 and
  EN 13284-2 | Continuous (14) | BAT 14 |
| Any stack with dust mass flow < 3 kg/h | EN 13284-1 | Once every year (9)
   (13) |
| Elemental chlorine (Cl2) | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every year (9)
   (13) | BAT 18 |
| Ethylene dichloride (EDC) | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Ethylene oxide | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Formaldehyde | All processes/sources | Any stack | EN standard under development | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Gaseous chlorides | All processes/sources | Any stack | EN 1911 | Once every year (9)
   (13) | BAT 18 |
| Gaseous fluorides | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every year (9)
   (13) | BAT 18 |
| Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every year (9)
   (13) | BAT 18 |
| Lead and its compounds | All processes/sources | Any stack | EN 14385 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (15) | BAT 14 |
| Nickel and its compounds | All processes/sources | Any stack | EN 14385 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (15) | BAT 14 |
| Nitrous oxide (N2O) | All processes/sources | Any stack | EN ISO 21258 | Once every year (9)
   (13) | – |
| Nitrogen oxides (NOX) | Thermal treatment | Any stack with a NOX mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 16 |
| Any stack with a NOX mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h | EN 14792 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| Process furnaces/heaters | Any stack with a NOX mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous (12) | BAT 36 |
| Any stack with a NOX mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h | EN 14792 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| All other processes/sources | Any stack with a NOX mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 18 |
| Any stack with a NOX mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h | EN 14792 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| PCDD/F | Thermal treatment | Any stack | EN 1948-1, EN 1948-2, EN 1948-3 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (15) | BAT 12 |
| PM2,5 and PM10 | All processes/sources | Any stack | EN ISO 23210 | Once every year (9)
   (13) | BAT 14 |
| Propylene oxide | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Sulphur dioxide (SO2) | Thermal treatment | Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 16 |
| Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h | EN 14791 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| Process furnaces/heaters | Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous (12) | BAT 18,
  BAT 36 |
| Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h | EN 14791 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| All other processes/sources | Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 18 |
| Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h | EN 14791 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| Tetrachloromethane | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Toluene | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Trichloromethane | All processes/sources | Any stack | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (9) | BAT 11 |
| Total volatile organic carbon (TVOC) | Production of polyolefins (16) | Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of ≥ 2 kg C/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 11, BAT 25 |
| Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of < 2 kg C/h | EN 12619 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| Production of synthetic rubbers (17) | Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of ≥ 2 kg C/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 11, BAT 32 |
| Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of < 2 kg C/h | EN 12619 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |
| All other processes/sources | Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of ≥ 2 kg C/h | Generic EN standards (11) | Continuous | BAT 11 |
| Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of < 2 kg C/h | EN 12619 | Once every 6 months (9)
   (10) |

Substance/Parameter (7)

Process(es)/Source(s)

Emission points

Standard(s) (8)

Minimum monitoring frequency

Monitoring associated with

Ammonia (NH3)

Use of SCR/SNCR

Any stack

EN 21877

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

BAT 17

All other processes/sources

BAT 18

Benzene

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

1,3-Butadiene

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Carbon monoxide (CO)

Thermal treatment

Any stack with a CO mass flow of ≥ 2 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 16

Any stack with a CO mass flow of < 2 kg/h

EN 15058

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

Process furnaces/heaters

Any stack with a CO mass flow of ≥ 2 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous (12)

BAT 36

Any stack with a CO mass flow of < 2 kg/h

EN 15058

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

All other processes/sources

Any stack with a CO mass flow of ≥ 2 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 18

Any stack with a CO mass flow of < 2 kg/h

EN 15058

Once every year (9)
   (13)

Chloromethane

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

CMR substances other than CMR substances covered elsewhere in this table (18)

All other processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Dichloromethane

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Dust

All processes/sources

Any stack with dust mass flow ≥ 3 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11),

EN 13284-1 and

EN 13284-2

Continuous (14)

BAT 14

Any stack with dust mass flow < 3 kg/h

EN 13284-1

Once every year (9)
   (13)

Elemental chlorine (Cl2)

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every year (9)
   (13)

BAT 18

Ethylene dichloride (EDC)

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Ethylene oxide

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Formaldehyde

All processes/sources

Any stack

EN standard under development

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Gaseous chlorides

All processes/sources

Any stack

EN 1911

Once every year (9)
   (13)

BAT 18

Gaseous fluorides

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every year (9)
   (13)

BAT 18

Hydrogen cyanide (HCN)

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every year (9)
   (13)

BAT 18

Lead and its compounds

All processes/sources

Any stack

EN 14385

Once every 6 months (9)
   (15)

BAT 14

Nickel and its compounds

All processes/sources

Any stack

EN 14385

Once every 6 months (9)
   (15)

BAT 14

Nitrous oxide (N2O)

All processes/sources

Any stack

EN ISO 21258

Once every year (9)
   (13)

–

Nitrogen oxides (NOX)

Thermal treatment

Any stack with a NOX mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 16

Any stack with a NOX mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h

EN 14792

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

Process furnaces/heaters

Any stack with a NOX mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous (12)

BAT 36

Any stack with a NOX mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h

EN 14792

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

All other processes/sources

Any stack with a NOX mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 18

Any stack with a NOX mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h

EN 14792

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

PCDD/F

Thermal treatment

Any stack

EN 1948-1, EN 1948-2, EN 1948-3

Once every 6 months (9)
   (15)

BAT 12

PM2,5 and PM10

All processes/sources

Any stack

EN ISO 23210

Once every year (9)
   (13)

BAT 14

Propylene oxide

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Sulphur dioxide (SO2)

Thermal treatment

Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 16

Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h

EN 14791

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

Process furnaces/heaters

Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous (12)

BAT 18,

BAT 36

Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h

EN 14791

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

All other processes/sources

Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of ≥ 2,5 kg/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 18

Any stack with a SO2 mass flow of < 2,5 kg/h

EN 14791

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

Tetrachloromethane

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Toluene

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Trichloromethane

All processes/sources

Any stack

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (9)

BAT 11

Total volatile organic carbon (TVOC)

Production of polyolefins (16)

Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of ≥ 2 kg C/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 11, BAT 25

Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of < 2 kg C/h

EN 12619

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

Production of synthetic rubbers (17)

Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of ≥ 2 kg C/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 11, BAT 32

Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of < 2 kg C/h

EN 12619

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

All other processes/sources

Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of ≥ 2 kg C/h

Generic EN standards (11)

Continuous

BAT 11

Any stack with a TVOC mass flow of < 2 kg C/h

EN 12619

Once every 6 months (9)
   (10)

1.1.3.3.   Organic compounds

BAT 9.   In order to increase resource efficiency and to reduce the mass flow of organic compounds sent to the final waste gas treatment, BAT is to recover organic compounds from process off-gases by using one or a combination of the techniques given below and to reuse them.

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| a. | Absorption (regenerative) | See Section 1.4.1. |
| b. | Adsorption (regenerative) | See Section 1.4.1. |
| c. | Condensation | See Section 1.4.1. |

Technique

Description

a.

Absorption (regenerative)

See Section 1.4.1.

b.

Adsorption (regenerative)

See Section 1.4.1.

c.

Condensation

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability

Recovery may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gas(es). Reuse may be restricted due to product quality specifications.

BAT 10.   In order to increase energy efficiency and to reduce the mass flow of organic compounds sent to the final waste gas treatment, BAT is to send process off-gases with a sufficient calorific value to a combustion unit that is, if technically possible, combined with heat recovery. BAT 9 has priority over sending process off-gases to a combustion unit.

Description

Process off-gases with a high calorific value are burnt as a fuel in a combustion unit (gas engine, boiler, process heater or furnace) and the heat is recovered as steam or for electricity generation, or to provide heat to the process.

For process off-gases with low VOC concentrations (e.g. < 1 g/Nm3), pre-concentration steps may be applied using adsorption (rotor or fixed bed, with activated carbon or zeolites), in order to increase the calorific value of the process off-gases.

Molecular sieves (‘smoothers’), typically composed of zeolites, may be used to level down high variations (e.g. concentration peaks) of VOC concentrations in the process off-gases.

Applicability

Sending process off-gases to a combustion unit may be restricted due to the presence of contaminants or due to safety considerations.

BAT 11.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of organic compounds, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.

| Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Adsorption | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| b. | Absorption | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| c. | Catalytic oxidation | See Section 1.4.1. | Applicability may be restricted by the presence of catalyst poisons in the waste gases. |
| d. | Condensation | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| e. | Thermal oxidation | See Section 1.4.1. | Applicability of recuperative and regenerative thermal oxidation to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints.
  Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gases. |
| f. | Bioprocesses | See Section 1.4.1. | Only applicable to the treatment of biodegradable compounds. |

Technique

Description

Applicability

a.

Adsorption

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

b.

Absorption

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

c.

Catalytic oxidation

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability may be restricted by the presence of catalyst poisons in the waste gases.

d.

Condensation

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

e.

Thermal oxidation

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability of recuperative and regenerative thermal oxidation to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints.

Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gases.

f.

Bioprocesses

See Section 1.4.1.

Only applicable to the treatment of biodegradable compounds.

Table 1.1

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for channelled emissions to air of organic compounds

| Substance/Parameter | BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)
  (Daily average or average over the sampling period) (19) |
| --- | --- |
| Total volatile organic carbon (TVOC) | < 1 -20  (20)
   (21)
   (22)
   (23) |
| Sum of VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B | < 1 -5  (24) |
| Sum of VOCs classified as CMR 2 | < 1 -10  (25) |
| Benzene | < 0,5 -1  (26) |
| 1,3-Butadiene | < 0,5 -1  (26) |
| Ethylene dichloride | < 0,5 -1  (26) |
| Ethylene oxide | < 0,5 -1  (26) |
| Propylene oxide | < 0,5 -1  (26) |
| Formaldehyde | 1 -5  (26) |
| Chloromethane | < 0,5 -1  (27)
   (28) |
| Dichloromethane | < 0,5 -1  (27)
   (28) |
| Tetrachloromethane | < 0,5 -1  (27)
   (28) |
| Toluene | < 0,5 -1  (27)
   (29) |
| Trichloromethane | < 0,5 -1  (27)
   (28) |

Substance/Parameter

BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)

(Daily average or average over the sampling period) (19)

Total volatile organic carbon (TVOC)

< 1 -20  (20)
   (21)
   (22)
   (23)

Sum of VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B

< 1 -5  (24)

Sum of VOCs classified as CMR 2

< 1 -10  (25)

Benzene

< 0,5 -1  (26)

1,3-Butadiene

< 0,5 -1  (26)

Ethylene dichloride

< 0,5 -1  (26)

Ethylene oxide

< 0,5 -1  (26)

Propylene oxide

< 0,5 -1  (26)

Formaldehyde

1 -5  (26)

Chloromethane

< 0,5 -1  (27)
   (28)

Dichloromethane

< 0,5 -1  (27)
   (28)

Tetrachloromethane

< 0,5 -1  (27)
   (28)

Toluene

< 0,5 -1  (27)
   (29)

Trichloromethane

< 0,5 -1  (27)
   (28)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.

BAT 12.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of PCDD/F from thermal treatment of waste gases containing chlorine and/or chlorinated compounds, BAT is to use techniques a. and b., and one or a combination of techniques c. to e., given below.

| Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Specific techniques to reduce PCDD/F emissions |
| a. | Optimised catalytic or thermal oxidation | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| b. | Rapid waste-gas cooling | Rapid cooling of waste gases from temperatures above 400 °C to below 250 °C to prevent the de novo synthesis of PCDD/F. | Generally applicable. |
| c. | Adsorption using activated carbon | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| d. | Absorption | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| Other techniques not primarily used to reduce PCDD/F emissions |
| e. | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | See Section 1.4.1.
  When SCR is used for NOX abatement, an adequate catalyst surface of the SCR system also provides for the partial reduction of the emissions of PCDD/F. | Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by space availability and/or by the presence of catalyst poisons in the waste gases. |

Technique

Description

Applicability

Specific techniques to reduce PCDD/F emissions

a.

Optimised catalytic or thermal oxidation

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

b.

Rapid waste-gas cooling

Rapid cooling of waste gases from temperatures above 400 °C to below 250 °C to prevent the de novo synthesis of PCDD/F.

Generally applicable.

c.

Adsorption using activated carbon

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

d.

Absorption

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

Other techniques not primarily used to reduce PCDD/F emissions

e.

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

See Section 1.4.1.

When SCR is used for NOX abatement, an adequate catalyst surface of the SCR system also provides for the partial reduction of the emissions of PCDD/F.

Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by space availability and/or by the presence of catalyst poisons in the waste gases.

Table 1.2

BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled emissions to air of PCDD/F from thermal treatment of waste gases containing chlorine and/or chlorinated compounds

| Substance/Parameter | BAT-AEL (ng I-TEQ/Nm3)
  (Average over the sampling period) |
| --- | --- |
| PCDD/F | < 0,01 -0,05 |

Substance/Parameter

BAT-AEL (ng I-TEQ/Nm3)

(Average over the sampling period)

PCDD/F

< 0,01 -0,05

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.

1.1.3.4.   Dust (including PM10 and PM2,5) and particulate-bound metals

BAT 13.   In order to increase resource efficiency and to reduce the mass flow of dust and particulate-bound metals sent to the final waste gas treatment, BAT is to recover materials from process off-gases by using one or a combination of the techniques given below and to reuse them.

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| a. | Cyclone | See Section 1.4.1. |
| b. | Fabric filter | See Section 1.4.1. |
| c. | Absorption | See Section 1.4.1. |

Technique

Description

a.

Cyclone

See Section 1.4.1.

b.

Fabric filter

See Section 1.4.1.

c.

Absorption

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability

Recovery may be restricted where the energy demand for dust purification or decontamination is excessive. Reuse may be restricted due to product quality specifications.

BAT 14.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of dust and particulate-bound metals, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.

| Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Absolute filter | See Section 1.4.1. | Applicability may be limited in the case of sticky dust or when the temperature of the waste gases is below the dew point. |
| b. | Absorption | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| c. | Fabric filter | See Section 1.4.1. | Applicability may be limited in the case of sticky dust or when the temperature of the waste gases is below the dew point. |
| d. | High-efficiency air filter | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| e. | Cyclone | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| f. | Electrostatic precipitator | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |

Technique

Description

Applicability

a.

Absolute filter

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability may be limited in the case of sticky dust or when the temperature of the waste gases is below the dew point.

b.

Absorption

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

c.

Fabric filter

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability may be limited in the case of sticky dust or when the temperature of the waste gases is below the dew point.

d.

High-efficiency air filter

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

e.

Cyclone

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

f.

Electrostatic precipitator

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

Table 1.3

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for channelled emissions to air of dust, lead and nickel

| Substance/Parameter | BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)
  (Daily average or average over the sampling period) |
| --- | --- |
| Dust | < 1 -5  (30)
   (31)
   (32)
   (33) |
| Lead and its compounds, expressed as Pb | < 0,01 -0,1  (34) |
| Nickel and its compounds, expressed as Ni | < 0,02 -0,1  (35) |

Substance/Parameter

BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)

(Daily average or average over the sampling period)

Dust

< 1 -5  (30)
   (31)
   (32)
   (33)

Lead and its compounds, expressed as Pb

< 0,01 -0,1  (34)

Nickel and its compounds, expressed as Ni

< 0,02 -0,1  (35)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.

1.1.3.5.   Inorganic compounds

BAT 15.   In order to increase resource efficiency and to reduce the mass flow of inorganic compounds sent to the final waste gas treatment, BAT is to recover inorganic compounds from process off-gases by using absorption and to reuse them.

Description

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability

Recovery may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gas(es). Reuse may be restricted due to product quality specifications.

BAT 16.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of CO, NOX and SOX from thermal treatment, BAT is to use technique c. and one or a combination of the other techniques given below.

| Technique | Description | Main inorganic compounds targeted | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Choice of fuel | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX, SOX | Generally applicable. |
| b. | Low-NOX burner | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX | Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints. |
| c. | Optimisation of catalytic or thermal oxidation | See Section 1.4.1. | CO, NOX | Generally applicable. |
| d. | Removal of high levels of NOX precursors | Remove (if possible, for reuse) high levels of NOX precursors prior to thermal or catalytic oxidation, e.g. by absorption, adsorption or condensation. | NOX | Generally applicable. |
| e. | Absorption | See Section 1.4.1. | SOX | Generally applicable. |
| f. | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX | Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by space availability. |
| g. | Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX | Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by the residence time needed for the reaction. |

Technique

Description

Main inorganic compounds targeted

Applicability

a.

Choice of fuel

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX, SOX

Generally applicable.

b.

Low-NOX burner

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX

Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints.

c.

Optimisation of catalytic or thermal oxidation

See Section 1.4.1.

CO, NOX

Generally applicable.

d.

Removal of high levels of NOX precursors

Remove (if possible, for reuse) high levels of NOX precursors prior to thermal or catalytic oxidation, e.g. by absorption, adsorption or condensation.

NOX

Generally applicable.

e.

Absorption

See Section 1.4.1.

SOX

Generally applicable.

f.

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX

Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by space availability.

g.

Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX

Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by the residence time needed for the reaction.

Table 1.4

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for channelled emissions to air of NOX and indicative emission level for channelled emissions to air of CO from thermal treatment

| Substance/Parameter | BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)
  (Daily average or average over the sampling period) |
| --- | --- |
| Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from catalytic oxidation | 5 -30  (36) |
| Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from thermal oxidation | 5 -130  (37) |
| Carbon monoxide (CO) | No BAT-AEL (38) |

Substance/Parameter

BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)

(Daily average or average over the sampling period)

Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from catalytic oxidation

5 -30  (36)

Nitrogen oxides (NOX) from thermal oxidation

5 -130  (37)

Carbon monoxide (CO)

No BAT-AEL (38)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.

The BAT-AEL for channelled emissions to air of SO2 is given in Table 1.6.

BAT 17.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of ammonia from the use of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) for the abatement of NOX emissions (ammonia slip), BAT is to optimise the design and/or operation of SCR or SNCR (e.g. optimised reagent to NOX ratio, homogeneous reagent distribution and optimum size of the reagent drops).

Table 1.5

BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled emissions to air of ammonia from the use of SCR or SNCR (ammonia slip)

| Substance/Parameter | BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)
  (Average over the sampling period) |
| --- | --- |
| Ammonia (NH3) from SCR/SNCR | < 0,5 -8  (39) |

Substance/Parameter

BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)

(Average over the sampling period)

Ammonia (NH3) from SCR/SNCR

< 0,5 -8  (39)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.

BAT 18.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of inorganic compounds other than channelled emissions to air of ammonia from the use of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) for the abatement of NOX emissions), channelled emissions to air of CO, NOX and SOX from the use of thermal treatment, and channelled emissions to air of NOX from process furnaces/heaters, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.

| Technique | Description | Main inorganic compounds targeted | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Specific techniques to reduce emissions to air of inorganic compounds |
| a. | Absorption | See Section 1.4.1. | Cl2, HCl, HCN, HF, NH3, NOX, SOX | Generally applicable. |
| b. | Adsorption | See Section 1.4.1.
  For the removal of inorganic substances, the technique is often used in combination with a dust abatement technique (see BAT 14). | HCl, HF, NH3, SOX | Generally applicable. |
| c. | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX | Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by space availability. |
| d. | Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX | Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by the residence time needed for the reaction. |
| Other techniques not primarily used to reduce emissions to air of inorganic compounds |
| e. | Catalytic oxidation | See Section 1.4.1. | NH3 | Applicability may be restricted by the presence of catalyst poisons in the waste gases. |
| f. | Thermal oxidation | See Section 1.4.1. | NH3, HCN | Applicability of recuperative and regenerative thermal oxidation to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints. The applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gases. |

Technique

Description

Main inorganic compounds targeted

Applicability

Specific techniques to reduce emissions to air of inorganic compounds

a.

Absorption

See Section 1.4.1.

Cl2, HCl, HCN, HF, NH3, NOX, SOX

Generally applicable.

b.

Adsorption

See Section 1.4.1.

For the removal of inorganic substances, the technique is often used in combination with a dust abatement technique (see BAT 14).

HCl, HF, NH3, SOX

Generally applicable.

c.

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX

Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by space availability.

d.

Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX

Applicability to existing plants may be restricted by the residence time needed for the reaction.

Other techniques not primarily used to reduce emissions to air of inorganic compounds

e.

Catalytic oxidation

See Section 1.4.1.

NH3

Applicability may be restricted by the presence of catalyst poisons in the waste gases.

f.

Thermal oxidation

See Section 1.4.1.

NH3, HCN

Applicability of recuperative and regenerative thermal oxidation to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints. The applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gases.

Table 1.6

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for channelled emissions to air of inorganic compounds

| Substance/Parameter | BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)
  (Daily average or average over the sampling period) |
| --- | --- |
| Ammonia (NH3) | 2 -10  (40)
   (41)
   (42) |
| Elemental chlorine (Cl2) | < 0,5 -2  (43)
   (44) |
| Gaseous fluorides, expressed as HF | ≤ 1  (43) |
| Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) | < 0,1 -1  (43) |
| Gaseous chlorides, expressed as HCl | 1 -10  (45) |
| Nitrogen oxides (NOX) | 10 -150  (46)
   (47)
   (48)
   (49) |
| Sulphur oxides (SO2) | < 3 -150  (48)
   (50) |

Substance/Parameter

BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)

(Daily average or average over the sampling period)

Ammonia (NH3)

2 -10  (40)
   (41)
   (42)

Elemental chlorine (Cl2)

< 0,5 -2  (43)
   (44)

Gaseous fluorides, expressed as HF

≤ 1  (43)

Hydrogen cyanide (HCN)

< 0,1 -1  (43)

Gaseous chlorides, expressed as HCl

1 -10  (45)

Nitrogen oxides (NOX)

10 -150  (46)
   (47)
   (48)
   (49)

Sulphur oxides (SO2)

< 3 -150  (48)
   (50)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.

1.1.4.   Diffuse VOC emissions to air

1.1.4.1.   Management system for diffuse VOC emissions

BAT 19.   In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce diffuse VOC emissions to air, BAT is to elaborate and implement a management system for diffuse VOC emissions, as part of the environmental management system (see BAT 1), that includes all of the following features:

| i. | Estimating the annual quantity of diffuse VOC emissions (see BAT 20). |
| --- | --- |

i.

Estimating the annual quantity of diffuse VOC emissions (see BAT 20).

| ii. | Monitoring diffuse VOC emissions from the use of solvents by compiling a solvent mass balance, if applicable (see BAT 21). |
| --- | --- |

ii.

Monitoring diffuse VOC emissions from the use of solvents by compiling a solvent mass balance, if applicable (see BAT 21).

| iii. | Establishing and implementing a leak detection and repair (LDAR) programme for fugitive VOC emissions. The LDAR programme typically lasts from 1 to 5 years depending on the nature, scale and complexity of the plant (5 years may correspond to large plants with a high number of emission sources).
  The LDAR programme includes all of the following features:






  a. | Listing of equipment identified as relevant fugitive VOC emission sources in the inventory of diffuse VOC emissions (see BAT 2). |
| --- | --- | --- |

iii.

Establishing and implementing a leak detection and repair (LDAR) programme for fugitive VOC emissions. The LDAR programme typically lasts from 1 to 5 years depending on the nature, scale and complexity of the plant (5 years may correspond to large plants with a high number of emission sources).

The LDAR programme includes all of the following features:

a.

Listing of equipment identified as relevant fugitive VOC emission sources in the inventory of diffuse VOC emissions (see BAT 2).

| b. | Definition of criteria associated with the following:






  — | Leaky equipment. Typical criteria could be a leak threshold, above which equipment is considered leaky, and/or the visualisation of a leak with OGI cameras. This depends on the characteristics of the emission source (e.g. accessibility) and the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s). |
| --- | --- | --- |

b.

Definition of criteria associated with the following:

—

Leaky equipment. Typical criteria could be a leak threshold, above which equipment is considered leaky, and/or the visualisation of a leak with OGI cameras. This depends on the characteristics of the emission source (e.g. accessibility) and the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s).

| — | Maintenance and/or repair actions to be carried out. A typical criterion could be a VOC concentration threshold triggering the maintenance or repair action (maintenance/repair threshold). The maintenance/repair threshold is generally equal to or higher than the leak threshold. This depends on the characteristics of the emission source (e.g. accessibility) and the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s). For the first LDAR programme, it is generally not higher than 5 000 ppmv for VOCs other than VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B, and 1 000 ppmv for VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B. For subsequent LDAR programmes, the maintenance/repair threshold is lowered (see point vi. a.) and not higher than 1 000 ppmv for VOCs other than VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B, and 500 ppmv for VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B, targeting 100 ppmv. |
| --- | --- |

—

Maintenance and/or repair actions to be carried out. A typical criterion could be a VOC concentration threshold triggering the maintenance or repair action (maintenance/repair threshold). The maintenance/repair threshold is generally equal to or higher than the leak threshold. This depends on the characteristics of the emission source (e.g. accessibility) and the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s). For the first LDAR programme, it is generally not higher than 5 000 ppmv for VOCs other than VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B, and 1 000 ppmv for VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B. For subsequent LDAR programmes, the maintenance/repair threshold is lowered (see point vi. a.) and not higher than 1 000 ppmv for VOCs other than VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B, and 500 ppmv for VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B, targeting 100 ppmv.

| c. | Measuring fugitive VOC emissions from equipment listed under point iii. a. (see BAT 22). |
| --- | --- |

c.

Measuring fugitive VOC emissions from equipment listed under point iii. a. (see BAT 22).

| d. | Carrying out maintenance and/or repair actions (see BAT 23, techniques e. and f.), as soon as possible and where necessary according to the criteria defined in point iii. b. Maintenance and repair actions are prioritised according to the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s), the significance of the emissions and/or operational constraints. The effectiveness of the maintenance and/or repair actions is verified according to point iii. c., leaving enough time after the intervention (e.g. 2 months). |
| --- | --- |

d.

Carrying out maintenance and/or repair actions (see BAT 23, techniques e. and f.), as soon as possible and where necessary according to the criteria defined in point iii. b. Maintenance and repair actions are prioritised according to the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s), the significance of the emissions and/or operational constraints. The effectiveness of the maintenance and/or repair actions is verified according to point iii. c., leaving enough time after the intervention (e.g. 2 months).

| e. | Filling in the database mentioned in point v. |
| --- | --- |

e.

Filling in the database mentioned in point v.

| iv. | Establishing and implementing a detection and reduction programme for non-fugitive VOC emissions that includes all of the following features:






  a. | Listing of equipment identified as relevant non-fugitive VOC emission sources in the inventory of diffuse VOC emissions (see BAT 2). |
| --- | --- | --- |

iv.

Establishing and implementing a detection and reduction programme for non-fugitive VOC emissions that includes all of the following features:

a.

Listing of equipment identified as relevant non-fugitive VOC emission sources in the inventory of diffuse VOC emissions (see BAT 2).

| b. | Monitoring non-fugitive VOC emissions from equipment listed under point iv. a. (see BAT 22). |
| --- | --- |

b.

Monitoring non-fugitive VOC emissions from equipment listed under point iv. a. (see BAT 22).

| c. | Planning and implementing techniques to reduce non-fugitive VOC emissions (see BAT 23, techniques a., c. and g. to j.). The planning and implementation of the techniques are prioritised according to the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s), the significance of the emissions and/or operational constraints. |
| --- | --- |

c.

Planning and implementing techniques to reduce non-fugitive VOC emissions (see BAT 23, techniques a., c. and g. to j.). The planning and implementation of the techniques are prioritised according to the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s), the significance of the emissions and/or operational constraints.

| d. | Filling in the database mentioned in point v. |
| --- | --- |

d.

Filling in the database mentioned in point v.

| v. | Establishing and maintaining a database, for diffuse VOC emissions sources that are identified in the inventory mentioned in BAT 2, for keeping record of:






  a. | equipment design specifications (including the date and description of any design changes); |
| --- | --- | --- |

v.

Establishing and maintaining a database, for diffuse VOC emissions sources that are identified in the inventory mentioned in BAT 2, for keeping record of:

a.

equipment design specifications (including the date and description of any design changes);

| b. | the equipment maintenance, repair, upgrade, or replacement actions, performed or planned, and their date of implementation; |
| --- | --- |

b.

the equipment maintenance, repair, upgrade, or replacement actions, performed or planned, and their date of implementation;

| c. | the equipment that could not be maintained, repaired, upgraded or replaced due to operational constraints; |
| --- | --- |

c.

the equipment that could not be maintained, repaired, upgraded or replaced due to operational constraints;

| d. | the results of the measurements or monitoring, including the concentration(s) of the emitted substance(s), the calculated leak rate (as kg/year), the recording from OGI cameras (e.g. from the last LDAR programme) and the date of the measurements or monitoring; |
| --- | --- |

d.

the results of the measurements or monitoring, including the concentration(s) of the emitted substance(s), the calculated leak rate (as kg/year), the recording from OGI cameras (e.g. from the last LDAR programme) and the date of the measurements or monitoring;

| e. | the annual quantity of diffuse VOC emissions (as fugitive and non-fugitive emissions), including information on non-accessible sources and accessible sources not monitored during the year. |
| --- | --- |

e.

the annual quantity of diffuse VOC emissions (as fugitive and non-fugitive emissions), including information on non-accessible sources and accessible sources not monitored during the year.

| vi. | Reviewing and updating the LDAR programme periodically. This may include the following:






  a. | lowering the leak and/or maintenance/repair thresholds (see point iii. b.); |
| --- | --- | --- |

vi.

Reviewing and updating the LDAR programme periodically. This may include the following:

a.

lowering the leak and/or maintenance/repair thresholds (see point iii. b.);

| b. | reviewing the prioritisation of equipment to be monitored, giving higher priority to (the type of) equipment identified as leaky during the previous LDAR programme; |
| --- | --- |

b.

reviewing the prioritisation of equipment to be monitored, giving higher priority to (the type of) equipment identified as leaky during the previous LDAR programme;

| c. | planning the maintenance, repair, upgrade or replacement of equipment that could not be performed during the previous LDAR programme due to operational constraints. |
| --- | --- |

c.

planning the maintenance, repair, upgrade or replacement of equipment that could not be performed during the previous LDAR programme due to operational constraints.

| vii. | Reviewing and updating the detection and reduction programme for non-fugitive VOC emissions. This may include the following:






  a. | monitoring non-fugitive VOC emissions from equipment where maintenance, repair, upgrade or replacement actions were implemented, in order to determine if those actions were successful; |
| --- | --- | --- |

vii.

Reviewing and updating the detection and reduction programme for non-fugitive VOC emissions. This may include the following:

a.

monitoring non-fugitive VOC emissions from equipment where maintenance, repair, upgrade or replacement actions were implemented, in order to determine if those actions were successful;

| b. | planning the maintenance, repair, upgrade or replacement actions that could not be performed due to operational constraints. |
| --- | --- |

b.

planning the maintenance, repair, upgrade or replacement actions that could not be performed due to operational constraints.

Applicability

The features points iii., iv., vi., and vii. are only applicable to sources of diffuse VOC emissions for which monitoring according to BAT 22 is applicable.

The level of detail of the management system for diffuse VOC emissions will be proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the plant, and the range of environmental impacts it may have.

1.1.4.2.   Monitoring

BAT 20.   BAT is to estimate fugitive and non-fugitive VOC emissions to air separately at least once every year by using one or a combination of the techniques given below, as well as to determine the uncertainty of this estimation. The estimation distinguishes between VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B and VOCs that are not classified as CMR 1A or 1B.

Note

The estimation of the diffuse VOC emissions to air takes into account the results of the monitoring carried out according to BAT 21 and/or to BAT 22.

For the purpose of the estimation, channelled emissions may be counted as non-fugitive emissions when the inherent characteristics of the waste gas stream (e.g. low velocities, variability of the flow rate and concentration) do not allow an accurate measurement according to BAT 8.

The main sources of uncertainty of the estimation are identified, and corrective actions are implemented to reduce the uncertainty.

| Technique | Description | Type of emissions |
| --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Use of emission factors | See Section 1.4.2. | Fugitive and/or non-fugitive |
| b. | Use of a mass balance | Estimation based on the difference in the mass of the substance inputs to and outputs from the plant/production unit, taking into account the generation and destruction of the substance in the plant/production unit.
  A mass balance may also consist of measuring the concentration of VOCs in the product (e.g. raw material or solvent). |
| c. | Use of thermodynamic models | Estimation using the laws of thermodynamics applied to equipment (e.g. tanks) or particular steps of a production process.
  The following data are generally used as input for the model:






  — | chemical properties of the substance (e.g. vapour pressure, molecular mass); |

Technique

Description

Type of emissions

a.

Use of emission factors

See Section 1.4.2.

Fugitive and/or non-fugitive

b.

Use of a mass balance

Estimation based on the difference in the mass of the substance inputs to and outputs from the plant/production unit, taking into account the generation and destruction of the substance in the plant/production unit.

A mass balance may also consist of measuring the concentration of VOCs in the product (e.g. raw material or solvent).

c.

Use of thermodynamic models

Estimation using the laws of thermodynamics applied to equipment (e.g. tanks) or particular steps of a production process.

The following data are generally used as input for the model:

—

chemical properties of the substance (e.g. vapour pressure, molecular mass);

| — | process operating data (e.g. operating time, product quantity, ventilation); |
| --- | --- |

—

process operating data (e.g. operating time, product quantity, ventilation);

| — | characteristics of the emission source (e.g. tank diameter, colour, shape). |
| --- | --- |

—

characteristics of the emission source (e.g. tank diameter, colour, shape).

BAT 21.   BAT is to monitor diffuse VOC emissions from the use of solvents by compiling, at least once every year, a solvent mass balance of the solvent inputs and outputs of the plant, as defined in Part 7 of Annex VII to Directive 2010/75/EU and to minimise the uncertainty of the solvent mass balance data by using all of the techniques given below.

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| a. | Full identification and quantification of the relevant solvent inputs and outputs, including the associated uncertainty | This includes:






  — | identification and documentation of solvent inputs and outputs (e.g. channelled and diffuse emissions to air, emissions to water, solvent output in waste); |

Technique

Description

a.

Full identification and quantification of the relevant solvent inputs and outputs, including the associated uncertainty

This includes:

—

identification and documentation of solvent inputs and outputs (e.g. channelled and diffuse emissions to air, emissions to water, solvent output in waste);

| — | substantiated quantification of each relevant solvent input and output and recording of the methodology used (e.g. measurement, estimation by using emission factors, estimation based on operational parameters); |
| --- | --- |

—

substantiated quantification of each relevant solvent input and output and recording of the methodology used (e.g. measurement, estimation by using emission factors, estimation based on operational parameters);

| — | identification of the main sources of uncertainty of the aforementioned quantification, and implementation of corrective actions to reduce the uncertainty; |
| --- | --- |

—

identification of the main sources of uncertainty of the aforementioned quantification, and implementation of corrective actions to reduce the uncertainty;

| — | regular update of solvent input and output data. |
| --- | --- |

—

regular update of solvent input and output data.

b.

Implementation of a solvent tracking system

A solvent tracking system aims to keep control of both the used and unused quantities of solvents (e.g. by weighing unused quantities returned to storage from the application area).

c.

Monitoring of changes that may influence the uncertainty of the solvent mass balance data

Any change that could influence the uncertainty of the solvent mass balance data is recorded, such as:

| — | malfunctions of the waste gas treatment system: the date and period of time are recorded; |
| --- | --- |

—

malfunctions of the waste gas treatment system: the date and period of time are recorded;

| — | changes that may influence air/gas flow rates (e.g. replacement of fans): the date and type of change are recorded. |
| --- | --- |

—

changes that may influence air/gas flow rates (e.g. replacement of fans): the date and type of change are recorded.

Applicability

This BAT may not apply to the production of polyolefins, PVC or synthetic rubbers.

This BAT may not be applicable to plants whose total annual consumption of solvents is lower than 50 tonnes. The level of detail of the solvent mass balance will be proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the plant, and the range of environmental impacts it may have, as well as to the type and quantity of solvents used.

BAT 22.   BAT is to monitor diffuse VOC emissions to air with at least the frequency given below and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.

| Type of sources of diffuse VOC emissions (51)
   (52) | Type of VOCs | Standard(s) | Minimum monitoring frequency |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sources of fugitive emissions | VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B | EN 15446 (58) | Once every year (53)
   (54)
   (55) |
| VOCs not classified as CMR 1A or 1B | Once during the period covered by each LDAR programme (see BAT 19 point iii.) (56) |
| Sources of non-fugitive emissions | VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B | EN 17628 | Once every year |
| VOCs not classified as CMR 1A or 1B | Once every year (57) |

Type of sources of diffuse VOC emissions (51)
   (52)

Type of VOCs

Standard(s)

Minimum monitoring frequency

Sources of fugitive emissions

VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B

EN 15446 (58)

Once every year (53)
   (54)
   (55)

VOCs not classified as CMR 1A or 1B

Once during the period covered by each LDAR programme (see BAT 19 point iii.) (56)

Sources of non-fugitive emissions

VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B

EN 17628

Once every year

VOCs not classified as CMR 1A or 1B

Once every year (57)

Note

Optical gas imaging (OGI) is a useful complementary technique to the method EN 15446 (‘sniffing’) in order to identify sources of fugitive VOC emissions and is particularly relevant in the case of inaccessible sources (see Section 1.4.2.). This technique is described in EN 17628.

In the case of non-fugitive emissions, measurements may be complemented by the use of thermodynamic models.

Where large amounts (e.g. above 80 t/yr) of VOCs are used/consumed, the quantification of VOC emissions from the plant with tracer correlation (TC) or with optical absorption-based techniques, such as differential absorption light detection and ranging (DIAL) or solar occultation flux (SOF), is a useful complementary technique (see Section 1.4.2.). These techniques are described in EN 17628.

Applicability

BAT 22 only applies when the annual quantity of diffuse VOC emissions from the plant estimated according to BAT 20 is greater than the following:

For fugitive emissions:

| — | 1 tonne of VOCs per year in the case of VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B; or |
| --- | --- |

—

1 tonne of VOCs per year in the case of VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B; or

| — | 5 tonnes of VOCs per year in the case of other VOCs. |
| --- | --- |

—

5 tonnes of VOCs per year in the case of other VOCs.

For non-fugitive emissions:

| — | 1 tonne of VOCs per year in the case of VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B; or |
| --- | --- |

—

1 tonne of VOCs per year in the case of VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B; or

| — | 5 tonnes of VOCs per year in the case of other VOCs. |
| --- | --- |

—

5 tonnes of VOCs per year in the case of other VOCs.

1.1.4.3.   Prevention or reduction of diffuse VOC emissions

BAT 23.   In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce diffuse VOC emissions to air, BAT is to use a combination of the techniques given below with the following order of priority.

Note

The use of techniques to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce diffuse VOC emissions to air is prioritised according to the hazardous properties of the emitted substance(s) and/or the significance of the emissions.

| Technique | Description | Type of emissions | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Prevention techniques |

Technique

Description

Type of emissions

Applicability

1.

a.

Limiting the number of emission sources

This includes:

| — | minimising pipe lengths; |
| --- | --- |

—

minimising pipe lengths;

| — | reducing the number of pipe connectors (e.g. flanges) and valves; |
| --- | --- |

—

reducing the number of pipe connectors (e.g. flanges) and valves;

| — | using welded fittings and connections; |
| --- | --- |

—

using welded fittings and connections;

| — | using compressed air or gravity for material transfer. |
| --- | --- |

—

using compressed air or gravity for material transfer.

Fugitive and non-fugitive emissions

Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints in the case of existing plants.

b.

Use of high-integrity equipment

High-integrity equipment includes, but is not limited to:

| — | bellow valves or double packing seals or equally effective equipment; |
| --- | --- |

—

bellow valves or double packing seals or equally effective equipment;

| — | magnetically driven or canned pumps/compressors/agitators, or pumps/compressors/agitators using double seals and a liquid barrier; |
| --- | --- |

—

magnetically driven or canned pumps/compressors/agitators, or pumps/compressors/agitators using double seals and a liquid barrier;

| — | certified high-quality gaskets (e.g. according to EN 13555) that are tightened according to technique e.; |
| --- | --- |

—

certified high-quality gaskets (e.g. according to EN 13555) that are tightened according to technique e.;

| — | closed sampling system. |
| --- | --- |

—

closed sampling system.

The use of high-integrity equipment is especially relevant to prevent or minimise:

| — | emissions of CMR substances or substances with acute toxicity; and/or |
| --- | --- |

—

emissions of CMR substances or substances with acute toxicity; and/or

| — | emissions from equipment with high-leaking potential; and/or |
| --- | --- |

—

emissions from equipment with high-leaking potential; and/or

| — | leaks from processes operated at high pressures (e.g. between 300 bar and 2 000 bar). |
| --- | --- |

—

leaks from processes operated at high pressures (e.g. between 300 bar and 2 000 bar).

High-integrity equipment is selected, installed and maintained according to the type of process and the process operating conditions.

Fugitive emissions

Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints in the case of existing plants.

Generally applicable to new plants and major plant upgrades.

c.

Collecting diffuse emissions and treating off-gases

Collecting diffuse VOC emissions (e.g. from compressor seals, vents and purge lines) and sending them to recovery (see BAT 9 and BAT 10) and/or abatement (see BAT 11).

Fugitive and non-fugitive emissions

Applicability may be restricted:

| — | for existing plants; and/or |
| --- | --- |

—

for existing plants; and/or

| — | by safety concerns (e.g. avoiding concentrations close to the lower explosive limit). |
| --- | --- |

—

by safety concerns (e.g. avoiding concentrations close to the lower explosive limit).

| 2. | Other techniques |
| --- | --- |

2.

d.

Facilitating access and/or monitoring activities

To ease maintenance and/or monitoring activities, the access to potentially leaky equipment is facilitated, e.g. by installing platforms, and/or drones are used for monitoring.

Fugitive emissions

Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints in the case of existing plants.

e.

Tightening

This includes:

| — | tightening of gaskets by personnel that is qualified according to EN 1591-4 and using the designed gasket stress (e.g. calculated according to EN 1591-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

tightening of gaskets by personnel that is qualified according to EN 1591-4 and using the designed gasket stress (e.g. calculated according to EN 1591-1);

| — | installing tight caps on open ends; |
| --- | --- |

—

installing tight caps on open ends;

| — | using flanges selected and assembled according to EN 13555. |
| --- | --- |

—

using flanges selected and assembled according to EN 13555.

Fugitive emissions

Generally applicable.

f.

Replacement of leaky equipment and/or parts

This includes the replacement of:

| — | gaskets; |
| --- | --- |

—

gaskets;

| — | sealing elements (e.g. tank lid); |
| --- | --- |

—

sealing elements (e.g. tank lid);

| — | packing material (e.g. valve stem packing material). |
| --- | --- |

—

packing material (e.g. valve stem packing material).

Fugitive emissions

Generally applicable.

g.

Reviewing and updating process design

This includes:

| — | reducing the use of solvents and/or using solvents with lower volatility; |
| --- | --- |

—

reducing the use of solvents and/or using solvents with lower volatility;

| — | reducing the formation of side products containing VOCs; |
| --- | --- |

—

reducing the formation of side products containing VOCs;

| — | lowering the operating temperature; |
| --- | --- |

—

lowering the operating temperature;

| — | lowering the VOC content in the final product. |
| --- | --- |

—

lowering the VOC content in the final product.

Non-fugitive emissions

Applicability may be restricted in the case of existing plants due to operational constraints.

h.

Reviewing and updating operating conditions

This includes:

| — | reducing the frequency and duration of reactor and vessel openings; |
| --- | --- |

—

reducing the frequency and duration of reactor and vessel openings;

| — | preventing corrosion by lining or coating of equipment, by painting pipes (for external corrosion) and by using corrosion inhibitors for materials in contact with equipment. |
| --- | --- |

—

preventing corrosion by lining or coating of equipment, by painting pipes (for external corrosion) and by using corrosion inhibitors for materials in contact with equipment.

Non-fugitive emissions

Generally applicable.

i.

Using closed systems

This includes:

| — | vapour balancing (see Section 1.4.3); |
| --- | --- |

—

vapour balancing (see Section 1.4.3);

| — | closed systems for solid/liquid and liquid/liquid phase separations; |
| --- | --- |

—

closed systems for solid/liquid and liquid/liquid phase separations;

| — | closed systems for cleaning operations; |
| --- | --- |

—

closed systems for cleaning operations;

| — | closed sewers and/or waste water treatment plants; |
| --- | --- |

—

closed sewers and/or waste water treatment plants;

| — | closed sampling systems; |
| --- | --- |

—

closed sampling systems;

| — | closed storage areas. |
| --- | --- |

—

closed storage areas.

Off-gases from closed systems are sent to recovery (see BAT 9 and BAT 10) and/or abatement (see BAT 11).

Non-fugitive emissions

Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints in the case of existing plants and/or by safety concerns.

j.

Using techniques to minimise emissions from surfaces

This includes:

| — | installing oil creaming systems on open surfaces; |
| --- | --- |

—

installing oil creaming systems on open surfaces;

| — | periodically skimming open surfaces (e.g. removing floating matter); |
| --- | --- |

—

periodically skimming open surfaces (e.g. removing floating matter);

| — | installing anti-evaporation floating elements on open surfaces; |
| --- | --- |

—

installing anti-evaporation floating elements on open surfaces;

| — | treating waste water streams to remove VOCs and send the VOCs to recovery (see BAT 9 and BAT 10) and/or abatement (see BAT 11); |
| --- | --- |

—

treating waste water streams to remove VOCs and send the VOCs to recovery (see BAT 9 and BAT 10) and/or abatement (see BAT 11);

| — | installing floating roofs on tanks; |
| --- | --- |

—

installing floating roofs on tanks;

| — | using fixed-roof tanks connected to a waste gas treatment. |
| --- | --- |

—

using fixed-roof tanks connected to a waste gas treatment.

Non-fugitive emissions

Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints in the case of existing plants.

1.1.4.4.   BAT conclusions for the use of solvents or the reuse of recovered solvents

The emission levels for the use of solvents or the reuse of recovered solvents given below are associated with the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.1 and Section 1.1.4.3.

Table 1.7

BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for diffuse VOC emissions to air from the use of solvents or the reuse of recovered solvents

| Parameter | BAT-AEL (percentage of the solvent inputs)
  (yearly average)  (59) |
| --- | --- |
| Diffuse VOC emissions | ≤ 5  % |

Parameter

BAT-AEL (percentage of the solvent inputs)

(yearly average)  (59)

Diffuse VOC emissions

≤ 5  %

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 20, BAT 21 and BAT 22.

1.2.   
  Polymers and synthetic rubbers

The BAT conclusions presented in this section apply to the production of certain polymers. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.1.

1.2.1.   BAT conclusions for the production of polyolefins

BAT 24.   BAT is to monitor the TVOC concentration in polyolefin products, at least once every year for each representative polyolefin grade produced during the same year, in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.

| Polyolefin product | Standard(s) | Monitoring associated with |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HDPE, LDPE, LLDPE | No EN standard available | BAT 20, BAT 25 |
| PP |
| EPS, GPPS, HIPS |

Polyolefin product

Standard(s)

Monitoring associated with

HDPE, LDPE, LLDPE

No EN standard available

BAT 20, BAT 25

PP

EPS, GPPS, HIPS

Note

The measurement samples are taken at the point of transition from the closed to the open system where the polyolefin comes into contact with the atmosphere.

The closed system refers to the part of the production process where the materials (e.g. reactants, solvents, suspension agents) are not in contact with the atmosphere. It includes the polymerisation steps, the reuse and recovery of materials.

The open system refers to the part of the production process where the polyolefins come into contact with the atmosphere. It includes the finishing steps (e.g. drying, blending) as well as the transfer, handling and storage of polyolefins.

When the transition point between the open and the closed system cannot be clearly identified, the measurement samples are taken at an appropriate point.

Applicability

Measurements do not apply to production processes only made up of a closed system.

BAT 25.   In order to increase resource efficiency and to reduce emissions to air of organic compounds, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below, as far as applicable.

| Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Chemical agents with low boiling points | Solvents and suspension agents with low boiling points are used. | Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints. |
| b. | Lowering the VOC content in the polymer | The VOC content in the polymer is lowered, e.g. by using low-pressure separation, stripping or closed-loop nitrogen purge systems, devolatilisation extrusion (see Section 1.4.3). The techniques for lowering the VOC content depend on the type of polymer product and production process. | Devolatilisation extrusion may be restricted by product specifications for the production of HDPE, LDPE and LLDPE. |
| c. | Collection and treatment of process off-gases | Process off-gases arising from the use of technique b. as well as from the finishing step, e.g. extrusion and degassing silos, are collected and sent to recovery (see BAT 9 and BAT 10) and/or abatement (see BAT 11). | Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints and/or due to safety concerns (e.g. avoiding concentrations close to the lower/upper explosive limit). |

Technique

Description

Applicability

a.

Chemical agents with low boiling points

Solvents and suspension agents with low boiling points are used.

Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints.

b.

Lowering the VOC content in the polymer

The VOC content in the polymer is lowered, e.g. by using low-pressure separation, stripping or closed-loop nitrogen purge systems, devolatilisation extrusion (see Section 1.4.3). The techniques for lowering the VOC content depend on the type of polymer product and production process.

Devolatilisation extrusion may be restricted by product specifications for the production of HDPE, LDPE and LLDPE.

c.

Collection and treatment of process off-gases

Process off-gases arising from the use of technique b. as well as from the finishing step, e.g. extrusion and degassing silos, are collected and sent to recovery (see BAT 9 and BAT 10) and/or abatement (see BAT 11).

Applicability may be restricted by operational constraints and/or due to safety concerns (e.g. avoiding concentrations close to the lower/upper explosive limit).

Table 1.8

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for total emissions to air of VOCs from the production of polyolefins expressed as specific emission loads

| Polyolefin product | Unit | BAT-AEL
  (Yearly average) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HDPE | g C per kg of polyolefins produced | 0,3 -1,0  (60) |
| LDPE | 0,1 -1,4  (61)
   (62) |
| LLDPE | 0,1 -0,8 |
| PP | 0,1 -0,9  (60) |
| GPPS and HIPS | < 0,1 |
| EPS | < 0,6 |

Polyolefin product

Unit

BAT-AEL

(Yearly average)

HDPE

g C per kg of polyolefins produced

0,3 -1,0  (60)

LDPE

0,1 -1,4  (61)
   (62)

LLDPE

0,1 -0,8

PP

0,1 -0,9  (60)

GPPS and HIPS

< 0,1

EPS

< 0,6

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8, BAT 20, BAT 22 and BAT 24. The monitoring of TVOC emissions to air includes all emissions from the following process steps, where the emissions are identified as relevant in the inventory given in BAT 2: storage and handling of raw materials, polymerisation, recovery of materials and pollutant abatement, finishing of the polymer (e.g. extrusion, drying, blending) as well as the transfer, handling and storage of polymers.

1.2.2.   BAT conclusions for the production of polyvinyl chloride (PVC)

BAT 26.   BAT is to monitor channelled emissions to air with at least the frequency given below and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.

| Substance | Emission points | Standard(s) | Minimum monitoring frequency (63) | Monitoring associated with |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| VCM | Any stack with a VCM mass flow of ≥ 25 g/h | Generic EN standards (64) | Continuous (65) | BAT 29 |
| Any stack with a VCM mass flow of < 25 g/h | No EN standard available | Once every 6 months (66)
   (67) |

Substance

Emission points

Standard(s)

Minimum monitoring frequency (63)

Monitoring associated with

VCM

Any stack with a VCM mass flow of ≥ 25 g/h

Generic EN standards (64)

Continuous (65)

BAT 29

Any stack with a VCM mass flow of < 25 g/h

No EN standard available

Once every 6 months (66)
   (67)

BAT 27.   BAT is to monitor the residual vinyl chloride monomer concentration in PVC slurry/latex, at least once every year for each representative PVC grade produced during the same year, in accordance with EN standards.

| Substance | Standard(s) | Monitoring associated with |
| --- | --- | --- |
| VCM | EN ISO 6401 | BAT 30 |

Substance

Standard(s)

Monitoring associated with

VCM

EN ISO 6401

BAT 30

Note

The samples of the PVC slurry/latex are taken at the point of transition from the closed to the open system where the PVC slurry/latex comes into contact with the atmosphere.

The closed system refers to the part of the production process where the PVC slurry/latex is not in contact with the atmosphere. It generally includes the polymerisation steps, the reuse and recovery of VCM.

The open system is the part of the system where the PVC slurry/latex comes into contact with the atmosphere. It includes the finishing steps (e.g. drying and blending) as well as the transfer, handling and storage of PVC.

BAT 28.   In order to increase resource efficiency and to reduce the mass flow of organic compounds sent to the final waste gas treatment, BAT is to recover the vinyl chloride monomer from process off-gases by using one or a combination of the techniques given below, and to reuse the recovered monomer.

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| a. | Absorption (regenerative) | See Section 1.4.1. |
| b. | Adsorption (regenerative) | See Section 1.4.1. |
| c. | Condensation | See Section 1.4.1. |

Technique

Description

a.

Absorption (regenerative)

See Section 1.4.1.

b.

Adsorption (regenerative)

See Section 1.4.1.

c.

Condensation

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability

Recovery may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gas(es).

BAT 29.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of vinyl chloride monomer from the recovery of vinyl chloride monomer, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.

| | Technique | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Absorption | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable |
| b. | Adsorption | See Section 1.4.1. |
| c. | Condensation | See Section 1.4.1. |
| d. | Thermal oxidation | See Section 1.4.1. | Applicability of recuperative and regenerative thermal oxidation to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints.
  Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gases. |

Technique

Description

Applicability

a.

Absorption

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable

b.

Adsorption

See Section 1.4.1.

c.

Condensation

See Section 1.4.1.

d.

Thermal oxidation

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability of recuperative and regenerative thermal oxidation to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints.

Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gases.

Table 1.9

BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled emissions to air of VCM from the recovery of VCM

| Substance | BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)
  (Daily average or average over the sampling period) |
| --- | --- |
| VCM | < 0,5 -1  (68)
   (69) |

Substance

BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)

(Daily average or average over the sampling period)

VCM

< 0,5 -1  (68)
   (69)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 26.

BAT 30.   In order to reduce emissions to air of vinyl chloride monomer, BAT is to use all of the techniques given below.

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| a. | Appropriate VCM storage facilities | This includes:






  — | storing VCM in refrigerated tanks at atmospheric pressure or in pressurised tanks at ambient temperature; |

Technique

Description

a.

Appropriate VCM storage facilities

This includes:

—

storing VCM in refrigerated tanks at atmospheric pressure or in pressurised tanks at ambient temperature;

| — | using refrigerated reflux condensers or connecting tanks for VCM recovery (see BAT 28) and/or abatement (see BAT 29). |
| --- | --- |

—

using refrigerated reflux condensers or connecting tanks for VCM recovery (see BAT 28) and/or abatement (see BAT 29).

b.

Vapour balancing

See Section 1.4.3.

c.

Minimisation of emissions of residual VCM from equipment

This includes:

| — | reducing the frequency and duration of reactor openings; |
| --- | --- |

—

reducing the frequency and duration of reactor openings;

| — | venting off-gases from latex storage tanks and from connections to VCM recovery (see BAT 28) and/or abatement (see BAT 29) prior to opening the reactor; |
| --- | --- |

—

venting off-gases from latex storage tanks and from connections to VCM recovery (see BAT 28) and/or abatement (see BAT 29) prior to opening the reactor;

| — | flushing the reactor with inert gas prior to opening and venting off-gases to VCM recovery (see BAT 28) and/or abatement (see BAT 29); |
| --- | --- |

—

flushing the reactor with inert gas prior to opening and venting off-gases to VCM recovery (see BAT 28) and/or abatement (see BAT 29);

| — | draining the liquid content of the reactor to closed vessels prior to opening the reactor; |
| --- | --- |

—

draining the liquid content of the reactor to closed vessels prior to opening the reactor;

| — | cleaning the reactor with water prior to opening and draining the water to the stripping system. |
| --- | --- |

—

cleaning the reactor with water prior to opening and draining the water to the stripping system.

d.

Lowering the VCM content in the polymer by stripping

See Section 1.4.3.

e.

Collection and treatment of process off-gases

Process off-gases from the use of technique d. are collected and sent to VCM recovery (see BAT 28) and/or abatement (see BAT 29).

Table 1.10

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for total emissions to air of VCM from the production of PVC expressed as specific emission loads

| PVC type | Unit | BAT-AEL
  (Yearly average) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| S-PVC | g VCM per kg of PVC produced | 0,01 -0,045 |
| E-PVC | 0,25 -0,3  (70) |

PVC type

Unit

BAT-AEL

(Yearly average)

S-PVC

g VCM per kg of PVC produced

0,01 -0,045

E-PVC

0,25 -0,3  (70)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 20, BAT 22, BAT 26 and BAT 27. The monitoring of VCM emissions to air includes all emissions from the following process steps or equipment, where the emissions are identified as relevant in the inventory given in BAT 2: finishing, e.g. drying and blending; transfer, handling and storage; reactor openings; gasholders; waste water treatment plants; recovery and/or abatement of VCM.

Table 1.11

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for the VCM concentration in the PVC slurry/latex

| PVC type | Unit | BAT-AEL
  (Yearly average) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| S-PVC | g VCM per kg of PVC produced | 0,01 -0,03 |
| E-PVC | 0,2 -0,4 |

PVC type

Unit

BAT-AEL

(Yearly average)

S-PVC

g VCM per kg of PVC produced

0,01 -0,03

E-PVC

0,2 -0,4

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 27.

1.2.3.   BAT conclusions for the production of synthetic rubbers

BAT 31.   BAT is to monitor the TVOC concentration in synthetic rubbers, at least once every year for each representative synthetic rubber grade produced during the same year, in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.

| Substance/Parameter | Standard(s) | Monitoring associated with |
| --- | --- | --- |
| VOCs | No EN standard available | BAT 32 |

Substance/Parameter

Standard(s)

Monitoring associated with

VOCs

No EN standard available

BAT 32

Note

The samples are taken after lowering the VOC content in the polymer (see BAT 32 a.) where the synthetic rubber comes into contact with the atmosphere.

Applicability

Measurements do not apply to production processes only made up of a closed system.

BAT 32.   In order to reduce emissions to air of organic compounds, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.

| | Technique | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Lowering the VOC content in the polymer | The VOC content in the polymer is lowered by using stripping or devolatilisation extrusion (see Section 1.4.3). |
| b. | Collection and treatment of process off-gases | Process off-gases are collected and sent to recovery (see BAT 9 and BAT 10) and/or abatement (see BAT 11). |

Technique

Description

a.

Lowering the VOC content in the polymer

The VOC content in the polymer is lowered by using stripping or devolatilisation extrusion (see Section 1.4.3).

b.

Collection and treatment of process off-gases

Process off-gases are collected and sent to recovery (see BAT 9 and BAT 10) and/or abatement (see BAT 11).

Table 1.12

BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for total emissions to air of VOC from the production of synthetic rubbers expressed as specific emission load

| Substance/Parameter | Unit | BAT-AEL
  (Yearly average) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TVOC | g C per kg of synthetic rubber produced | 0,2 -4,2 |

Substance/Parameter

Unit

BAT-AEL

(Yearly average)

TVOC

g C per kg of synthetic rubber produced

0,2 -4,2

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8, BAT 20, BAT 22 and BAT 31. The monitoring of TVOC emissions to air includes all emissions from the following process steps, where the emissions are identified as relevant in the inventory given in BAT 2: storage of raw materials, polymerisation, recovery of materials and abatement techniques, finishing of the polymer (e.g. extrusion, drying, blending) as well as the transfer, handling and storage of synthetic rubbers.

1.2.4.   BAT conclusions for the production of viscose using CS2

BAT 33.   BAT is to monitor channelled emissions to air with at least the frequency given below and in accordance with EN standards. If EN standards are not available, BAT is to use ISO, national or other international standards that ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality.

| Substance (71) | Emission points | Standard(s) | Minimum monitoring frequency | Monitoring associated with |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Carbon disulphide (CS2) | Any stack with a mass flow of ≥ 1 kg/h | Generic EN standards (72) | Continuous (73) | BAT 35 |
| Any stack with a mass flow of < 1 kg/h | No EN standard available | Once every year (74) |
| Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) | Any stack with a mass flow of ≥ 50 g/h | Generic EN standards (72) | Continuous (73) |
| Any stack with a mass flow of < 50 g/h | No EN standard available | Once every year (74) |

Substance (71)

Emission points

Standard(s)

Minimum monitoring frequency

Monitoring associated with

Carbon disulphide (CS2)

Any stack with a mass flow of ≥ 1 kg/h

Generic EN standards (72)

Continuous (73)

BAT 35

Any stack with a mass flow of < 1 kg/h

No EN standard available

Once every year (74)

Hydrogen sulphide (H2S)

Any stack with a mass flow of ≥ 50 g/h

Generic EN standards (72)

Continuous (73)

Any stack with a mass flow of < 50 g/h

No EN standard available

Once every year (74)

BAT 34.   In order to increase resource efficiency and to reduce the mass flow of CS2 and H2S sent to the final waste gas treatment, BAT is to recover CS2 by using technique a. and/or technique b. or a combination of technique c. with technique(s) a. and/or b., given below and to reuse the CS2, or, alternatively, to use technique d.

| Technique | Main substance targeted | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Absorption (regenerative) | H2S | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable for the production of casing.
  For other products, applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to high waste gas volume flows (above e.g. 120 000 Nm3/h) or low H2S concentration in the waste gas (below e.g. 0,5 g/Nm3). |
| b. | Adsorption (regenerative) | H2S, CS2 | See Section 1.4.1. | Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand for recovery is excessive if the concentration of CS2 in the waste gas is below e.g. 5 g/Nm3. |
| c. | Condensation | H2S, CS2 | See Section 1.4.1. |
| d. | Production of sulphuric acid | H2S, CS2 | Process off-gases containing CS2 and H2S are used to produce sulphuric acid. | Applicability may be restricted if the concentration of CS2 and/or H2S in the waste gas is below 5 g/Nm3. |

Technique

Main substance targeted

Description

Applicability

a.

Absorption (regenerative)

H2S

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable for the production of casing.

For other products, applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to high waste gas volume flows (above e.g. 120 000 Nm3/h) or low H2S concentration in the waste gas (below e.g. 0,5 g/Nm3).

b.

Adsorption (regenerative)

H2S, CS2

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand for recovery is excessive if the concentration of CS2 in the waste gas is below e.g. 5 g/Nm3.

c.

Condensation

H2S, CS2

See Section 1.4.1.

d.

Production of sulphuric acid

H2S, CS2

Process off-gases containing CS2 and H2S are used to produce sulphuric acid.

Applicability may be restricted if the concentration of CS2 and/or H2S in the waste gas is below 5 g/Nm3.

BAT 35.   In order to reduce channelled emissions to air of CS2 and H2S, BAT is to use one or a combination of the techniques given below.

| Technique | Main substance targeted | Description | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| a. | Absorption | H2S | See Section 1.4.1. | Generally applicable. |
| b. | Bioprocesses | CS2, H2S | See Section 1.4.1. | Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to high waste gas volume flows (e.g. above 60 000 Nm3/h) or high CS2 concentration in the waste gas (e.g. above 1 000 mg/Nm3) or too low H2S concentration. |
| c. | Thermal oxidation | CS2, H2S | See Section 1.4.1. | Applicability of recuperative and regenerative thermal oxidation to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints.
  Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gases. |

Technique

Main substance targeted

Description

Applicability

a.

Absorption

H2S

See Section 1.4.1.

Generally applicable.

b.

Bioprocesses

CS2, H2S

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to high waste gas volume flows (e.g. above 60 000 Nm3/h) or high CS2 concentration in the waste gas (e.g. above 1 000 mg/Nm3) or too low H2S concentration.

c.

Thermal oxidation

CS2, H2S

See Section 1.4.1.

Applicability of recuperative and regenerative thermal oxidation to existing plants may be restricted by design and/or operational constraints.

Applicability may be restricted where the energy demand is excessive due to the low concentration of the compound(s) concerned in the process off-gases.

Table 1.13

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for channelled emissions to air of CS2 and H2S from the production of viscose using CS2

| Substance | BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)
  (Daily average or average over the sampling period) (75) |
| --- | --- |
| CS2 | 5 -400  (76)
   (77) |
| H2S | 1 -10  (78) |

Substance

BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)

(Daily average or average over the sampling period) (75)

CS2

5 -400  (76)
   (77)

H2S

1 -10  (78)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 33.

Table 1.14

BAT-associated emission levels (BAT-AELs) for emissions to air of H2S and CS2 from the production of staple fibres and casing expressed as specific emission loads

| Parameter | Process | Unit | BAT-AEL
  (Yearly average) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sum of H2S and CS2 (expressed as Total S) (79) | Production of staple fibres | g Total S per kg of product | 6 -9 |
| Casing | 120 -250 |

Parameter

Process

Unit

BAT-AEL

(Yearly average)

Sum of H2S and CS2 (expressed as Total S) (79)

Production of staple fibres

g Total S per kg of product

6 -9

Casing

120 -250

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 33.

1.3.   
  Process furnaces/heaters

The BAT conclusions presented in this section apply when process furnaces/heaters with a total rated thermal input equal to or greater than 1 MW are used in the production processes included in the scope of these BAT conclusions. They apply in addition to the general BAT conclusions given in Section 1.1.

Where the waste gases of two or more separate process furnaces/heaters are, or could, in the judgement of the competent authority, be discharged through a common stack, the capacities of all individual furnaces/heaters shall be added together for the purpose of calculating the total rated thermal input.

BAT 36.   In order to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce channelled emissions to air of CO, dust, NOX and SOX, BAT is to use technique c. and one or a combination of the other techniques given below.

| Technique | Description | Main inorganic compounds targeted | Applicability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Primary techniques |
| a. | Choice of fuel | See Section 1.4.1. This includes switching from liquid to gaseous fuels, taking into account the overall hydrocarbon balance. | NOX, SOX, dust | The switch from liquid to gaseous fuels may be restricted by the design of the burners in the case of existing process furnaces/heaters. |
| b. | Low-NOX burner | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX | For existing process furnaces/heaters, the applicability may be restricted by their design. |
| c. | Optimised combustion | See Section 1.4.1. | CO, NOX | Generally applicable. |
| Secondary techniques |
| d. | Absorption | See Section 1.4.1. | SOX, dust | Applicability may be restricted for existing process furnaces/heaters by space availability. |
| e. | Fabric filter or absolute filter | See Section 1.4.1. | Dust | Not applicable when only combusting gaseous fuels. |
| f. | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX | Applicability to existing process furnaces/heaters may be restricted by space availability. |
| g. | Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) | See Section 1.4.1. | NOX | Applicability to existing process furnaces/heaters may be restricted by the temperature window (800-1 100  °C) and the residence time needed for the reaction. |

Technique

Description

Main inorganic compounds targeted

Applicability

Primary techniques

a.

Choice of fuel

See Section 1.4.1. This includes switching from liquid to gaseous fuels, taking into account the overall hydrocarbon balance.

NOX, SOX, dust

The switch from liquid to gaseous fuels may be restricted by the design of the burners in the case of existing process furnaces/heaters.

b.

Low-NOX burner

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX

For existing process furnaces/heaters, the applicability may be restricted by their design.

c.

Optimised combustion

See Section 1.4.1.

CO, NOX

Generally applicable.

Secondary techniques

d.

Absorption

See Section 1.4.1.

SOX, dust

Applicability may be restricted for existing process furnaces/heaters by space availability.

e.

Fabric filter or absolute filter

See Section 1.4.1.

Dust

Not applicable when only combusting gaseous fuels.

f.

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX

Applicability to existing process furnaces/heaters may be restricted by space availability.

g.

Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)

See Section 1.4.1.

NOX

Applicability to existing process furnaces/heaters may be restricted by the temperature window (800-1 100  °C) and the residence time needed for the reaction.

Table 1.15

BAT-associated emission level (BAT-AEL) for channelled NOX emissions to air and indicative emission level for channelled CO emissions to air from process furnaces/heaters

| Parameter | BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)
  (Daily average or average over the sampling period) |
| --- | --- |
| Nitrogen oxides (NOX) | 30 -150  (80)
   (81)
   (82) |
| Carbon monoxide (CO) | No BAT-AEL (83) |

Parameter

BAT-AEL (mg/Nm3)

(Daily average or average over the sampling period)

Nitrogen oxides (NOX)

30 -150  (80)
   (81)
   (82)

Carbon monoxide (CO)

No BAT-AEL (83)

The associated monitoring is given in BAT 8.

1.4.   
  Description of techniques

1.4.1.   Techniques to reduce channelled emissions to air

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| Absorption | The removal of gaseous or particulate pollutants from a process off-gas or waste gas stream via mass transfer to a suitable liquid, often water or an aqueous solution. It may involve a chemical reaction (e.g. in an acid or alkaline scrubber). In the case of regenerative absorption, the compounds may be recovered from the liquid. |
| Adsorption | The removal of pollutants from a process off-gas or waste gas stream by retention on a solid surface (activated carbon is typically used as the adsorbent). Adsorption may be regenerative or non-regenerative.
  In non-regenerative adsorption, the spent adsorbent is not regenerated but disposed of.
  In the case of regenerative adsorption, the adsorbate is subsequently desorbed, e.g. with steam (often on site), for reuse or disposal and the adsorbent is reused. For continuous operation, typically more than two adsorbers are operated in parallel, one of them in desorption mode. |
| Bioprocesses | Bioprocesses include the following:






  — | Biofiltration: the waste gas stream is passed through a bed of organic material (such as peat, heather, compost, root wood, tree bark, peat, compost, softwood and different kinds of combinations) or some inert material (such as clay, activated carbon, and polyurethane), where it is biologically oxidised by naturally occurring microorganisms into carbon dioxide, water, inorganic salts and biomass. |

Technique

Description

Absorption

The removal of gaseous or particulate pollutants from a process off-gas or waste gas stream via mass transfer to a suitable liquid, often water or an aqueous solution. It may involve a chemical reaction (e.g. in an acid or alkaline scrubber). In the case of regenerative absorption, the compounds may be recovered from the liquid.

Adsorption

The removal of pollutants from a process off-gas or waste gas stream by retention on a solid surface (activated carbon is typically used as the adsorbent). Adsorption may be regenerative or non-regenerative.

In non-regenerative adsorption, the spent adsorbent is not regenerated but disposed of.

In the case of regenerative adsorption, the adsorbate is subsequently desorbed, e.g. with steam (often on site), for reuse or disposal and the adsorbent is reused. For continuous operation, typically more than two adsorbers are operated in parallel, one of them in desorption mode.

Bioprocesses

Bioprocesses include the following:

—

Biofiltration: the waste gas stream is passed through a bed of organic material (such as peat, heather, compost, root wood, tree bark, peat, compost, softwood and different kinds of combinations) or some inert material (such as clay, activated carbon, and polyurethane), where it is biologically oxidised by naturally occurring microorganisms into carbon dioxide, water, inorganic salts and biomass.

| — | Bioscrubbing: the removal of the pollutant compounds from a waste gas stream using a combination of wet scrubbing (absorption) and biodegradation under aerobic conditions. The scrubbing water contains a population of microorganisms suitable to oxidise biodegradable gaseous compounds. The absorbed pollutants are degraded in aerated sludge tanks. |
| --- | --- |

—

Bioscrubbing: the removal of the pollutant compounds from a waste gas stream using a combination of wet scrubbing (absorption) and biodegradation under aerobic conditions. The scrubbing water contains a population of microorganisms suitable to oxidise biodegradable gaseous compounds. The absorbed pollutants are degraded in aerated sludge tanks.

| — | Biotrickling: the removal of the pollutant compounds from a waste gas stream in a biological trickle-bed reactor. The pollutants are absorbed by the water phase and transported to the biofilm, where the biological transformation takes place. |
| --- | --- |

—

Biotrickling: the removal of the pollutant compounds from a waste gas stream in a biological trickle-bed reactor. The pollutants are absorbed by the water phase and transported to the biofilm, where the biological transformation takes place.

Choice of fuel

The use of fuel (including support/auxiliary fuel) with a low content of potential pollution-generating compounds (e.g. low sulphur, ash, nitrogen, fluorine or chlorine content in the fuel).

Condensation

The removal of vapours of organic and inorganic compounds from a process off-gas or waste gas stream by reducing its temperature below its dew point so that the vapours liquefy. Depending on the operating temperature range required, different cooling media are used, e.g. water or brine.

In cryogenic condensation, liquid nitrogen is used as a cooling medium.

Cyclone

Equipment for the removal of dust from a process off-gas or waste gas stream based on imparting centrifugal forces, usually within a conical chamber.

Electrostatic precipitator

An electrostatic precipitator (ESP) is a particulate control device that uses electrical forces to move particles entrained within a waste gas stream onto collector plates. The entrained particles are given an electrical charge when they pass through a corona where gaseous ions flow. Electrodes in the centre of the flow lane are maintained at a high voltage and generate the electrical field that forces the particles to the collector walls. The pulsating DC voltage required is in the range of 20-100 kV.

Absolute filter

Absolute filters, also referred to as high-efficiency particle air (HEPA) filters or ultra-low penetration air (ULPA) filters, are constructed from glass cloth or fabrics of synthetic fibres through which gases are passed to remove particles. Absolute filters show higher efficiencies than fabric filters. The classification of HEPA and ULPA filters according to their performance is given in EN 1822-1.

High-efficiency air filter (HEAF)

A flat-bed filter in which aerosols combine into droplets. Highly viscous droplets remain on the filter fabric which contains the residues to be disposed of and separated into droplets, aerosols and dust. HEAFs are particularly suitable for treating highly viscous droplets.

Fabric filter

Fabric filters, often referred to as bag filters, are constructed from porous woven or felted fabric through which gases are passed to remove particles. The use of a fabric filter requires the selection of a fabric suitable for the characteristics of the waste gas and the maximum operating temperature.

Low-NOX burner

The technique (including ultra-low-NOX burner) is based on the principles of reducing peak flame temperatures. The air/fuel mixing reduces the availability of oxygen and reduces the peak flame temperature, thus retarding the conversion of fuel-bound nitrogen to NOX and the formation of thermal NOX, while maintaining high combustion efficiency. The design of ultra-low-NOX burners includes (air/)fuel staging and exhaust/flue-gas recirculation.

Optimised combustion

Good design of the combustion chambers, burners and associated equipment/devices is combined with optimisation of combustion conditions (e.g. the temperature and residence time in the combustion zone, efficient mixing of the fuel and combustion air) and the regular planned maintenance of the combustion system according to suppliers’ recommendations. Combustion conditions control is based on the continuous monitoring and automated control of appropriate combustion parameters (e.g. O2, CO, fuel to air ratio, and unburnt substances).

Optimisation of catalytic or thermal oxidation

Optimisation of design and operation of catalytic or thermal oxidation to promote the oxidation of organic compounds including PCDD/F present in the waste gases, to prevent PCDD/F and the (re)formation of their precursors, as well as to reduce the generation of pollutants such as NOX and CO.

Catalytic oxidation

Abatement technique which oxidises combustible compounds in a waste gas stream with air or oxygen in a catalyst bed. The catalyst enables oxidation at lower temperatures and in smaller equipment compared to thermal oxidation. The typical oxidation temperature is between 200 °C and 600 °C.

For process off-gases with low VOC concentrations (e.g. < 1 g/Nm3), pre-concentration steps may be applied using adsorption (rotor or fixed bed, with activated carbon or zeolites). VOCs adsorbed in the concentrator are desorbed by using heated ambient air or heated waste gas, and the resulting volume flow with higher VOC concentration is directed to the oxidiser.

Molecular sieves (‘smoothers’), typically composed of zeolites, may be used before the concentrators or the oxidiser to level down high variations of VOC concentrations in the process off-gases.

Thermal oxidation

Abatement technique which oxidises combustible compounds in a waste gas stream by heating it with air or oxygen to above its auto-ignition point in a combustion chamber and maintaining it at a high temperature long enough to complete its combustion to carbon dioxide and water. The typical combustion temperature is between 800 °C and 1 000  °C.

Several types of thermal oxidation are operated:

| — | Straight thermal oxidation: thermal oxidation without energy recovery from the combustion. |
| --- | --- |

—

Straight thermal oxidation: thermal oxidation without energy recovery from the combustion.

| — | Recuperative thermal oxidation: thermal oxidation using the heat of the waste gases by indirect heat transfer. |
| --- | --- |

—

Recuperative thermal oxidation: thermal oxidation using the heat of the waste gases by indirect heat transfer.

| — | Regenerative thermal oxidation: thermal oxidation where the incoming waste gas stream is heated when passing through a ceramic-packed bed before entering the combustion chamber. The purified hot gases exit this chamber by passing through one (or more) ceramic-packed bed(s) (cooled by an incoming waste gas stream in an earlier combustion cycle). This reheated packed bed then begins a new combustion cycle by preheating a new incoming waste gas stream. |
| --- | --- |

—

Regenerative thermal oxidation: thermal oxidation where the incoming waste gas stream is heated when passing through a ceramic-packed bed before entering the combustion chamber. The purified hot gases exit this chamber by passing through one (or more) ceramic-packed bed(s) (cooled by an incoming waste gas stream in an earlier combustion cycle). This reheated packed bed then begins a new combustion cycle by preheating a new incoming waste gas stream.

For process off-gases with low VOC concentrations (e.g. < 1 g/Nm3), pre-concentration steps may be applied using adsorption (rotor or fixed bed, with activated carbon or zeolites). VOCs adsorbed in the concentrator are desorbed by using heated ambient air or heated waste gas, and the resulting volume flow with higher VOC concentration is directed to the oxidiser.

Molecular sieves (‘smoothers’), typically composed of zeolites, may be used before the concentrators or the oxidiser to level down high variations of VOC concentrations in the process off-gases.

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

Selective reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia or urea in the presence of a catalyst. The technique is based on the reduction of NOX to nitrogen in a catalytic bed by reaction with ammonia at an optimum operating temperature that is typically around 200– 450 °C. In general, ammonia is injected as an aqueous solution; the ammonia source can also be anhydrous ammonia or a urea solution. Several layers of catalyst may be applied. A higher NOX reduction is achieved with the use of a larger catalyst surface, installed as one or more layers. ‘In-duct’ or ‘slip’ SCR combines SNCR with downstream SCR which reduces the ammonia slip from SNCR.

Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)

Selective reduction of nitrogen oxides to nitrogen with ammonia or urea at high temperatures and without catalyst. The operating temperature window is maintained between 800 °C and 1 000  °C for optimal reaction.

1.4.2.   Techniques to monitor diffuse emissions to air

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| Differential absorption LIDAR (DIAL) | A laser-based technique using differential absorption LIDAR (light detection and ranging), which is the optical analogue of radio-wave-based RADAR. The technique relies on the back-scattering of laser beam pulses by atmospheric aerosols, and the analysis of the spectral properties of the returned light collected with a telescope. |
| Emission factor | Emission factors are numbers that can be multiplied by an activity rate (e.g. the production output), in order to estimate the emissions from the installation. Emission factors are generally derived through the testing of a population of similar process equipment or process steps. This information can be used to relate the quantity of material emitted to some general measure of the scale of activity. In the absence of other information, default emission factors (e.g. literature values) can be used to provide an estimate of the emissions.
  Emission factors are usually expressed as the mass of a substance emitted divided by the throughput of the process emitting the substance. |
| Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) programme | A structured approach to reduce fugitive VOC emissions by detection and subsequent repair or replacement of leaking components. The LDAR programme consists of one or more campaigns. A campaign is usually conducted over 1 year, where a certain percentage of the pieces of equipment is monitored. |
| Optical gas imaging (OGI) methods | Optical gas imaging uses small lightweight hand-held or fixed cameras which enable the visualisation of gas leaks in real time, so that they appear as ‘smoke’ on a video recorder together with the image of the equipment concerned, to easily and rapidly locate significant VOC leaks. Active systems produce an image with a back-scattered infrared laser light reflected on the equipment and its surroundings. Passive systems are based on the natural infrared radiation of the equipment and its surroundings. |
| Solar occultation flux (SOF) | The technique is based on the recording and spectrometric Fourier Transform analysis of a broadband infrared or ultraviolet/visible sunlight spectrum along a given geographical itinerary, crossing the wind direction and cutting through VOC plumes. |

Technique

Description

Differential absorption LIDAR (DIAL)

A laser-based technique using differential absorption LIDAR (light detection and ranging), which is the optical analogue of radio-wave-based RADAR. The technique relies on the back-scattering of laser beam pulses by atmospheric aerosols, and the analysis of the spectral properties of the returned light collected with a telescope.

Emission factor

Emission factors are numbers that can be multiplied by an activity rate (e.g. the production output), in order to estimate the emissions from the installation. Emission factors are generally derived through the testing of a population of similar process equipment or process steps. This information can be used to relate the quantity of material emitted to some general measure of the scale of activity. In the absence of other information, default emission factors (e.g. literature values) can be used to provide an estimate of the emissions.

Emission factors are usually expressed as the mass of a substance emitted divided by the throughput of the process emitting the substance.

Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) programme

A structured approach to reduce fugitive VOC emissions by detection and subsequent repair or replacement of leaking components. The LDAR programme consists of one or more campaigns. A campaign is usually conducted over 1 year, where a certain percentage of the pieces of equipment is monitored.

Optical gas imaging (OGI) methods

Optical gas imaging uses small lightweight hand-held or fixed cameras which enable the visualisation of gas leaks in real time, so that they appear as ‘smoke’ on a video recorder together with the image of the equipment concerned, to easily and rapidly locate significant VOC leaks. Active systems produce an image with a back-scattered infrared laser light reflected on the equipment and its surroundings. Passive systems are based on the natural infrared radiation of the equipment and its surroundings.

Solar occultation flux (SOF)

The technique is based on the recording and spectrometric Fourier Transform analysis of a broadband infrared or ultraviolet/visible sunlight spectrum along a given geographical itinerary, crossing the wind direction and cutting through VOC plumes.

1.4.3.   Techniques to reduce diffuse emissions

| Technique | Description |
| --- | --- |
| Devolatilisation extrusion | When the concentrated rubber solution is further processed by extrusion, the solvent vapours (commonly cyclohexane, hexane, heptane, toluene, cyclopentane, isopentane or mixtures thereof) coming from the vent hole of the extruder are compressed and sent to recovery. |
| Stripping | VOCs contained in the polymer are transferred to the gaseous phase (e.g. by using steam). The removal efficiency may be optimised by a suitable combination of temperature, pressure and residence time and by maximising the ratio of free polymer surface to total polymer volume. |
| Vapour balancing | The vapour from a piece of receiving equipment (e.g. a tank) that is displaced during the transfer of a liquid and is returned to the delivery equipment from which the liquid is delivered. |

Technique

Description

Devolatilisation extrusion

When the concentrated rubber solution is further processed by extrusion, the solvent vapours (commonly cyclohexane, hexane, heptane, toluene, cyclopentane, isopentane or mixtures thereof) coming from the vent hole of the extruder are compressed and sent to recovery.

Stripping

VOCs contained in the polymer are transferred to the gaseous phase (e.g. by using steam). The removal efficiency may be optimised by a suitable combination of temperature, pressure and residence time and by maximising the ratio of free polymer surface to total polymer volume.

Vapour balancing

The vapour from a piece of receiving equipment (e.g. a tank) that is displaced during the transfer of a liquid and is returned to the delivery equipment from which the liquid is delivered.

---

(1)  Directive (EU) 2015/2193 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from medium combustion plants (OJ L 313, 28.11.2015, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (OJ L 152, 11.6.2008, p. 1).

(3)  Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1).

(4)  Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

(5)  For any parameter where, due to sampling or analytical limitations and/or due to operational conditions (e.g. batch processes), a 30-minute sampling/measurement and/or an average of three consecutive samplings/measurements is inappropriate, a more representative sampling/measurement procedure may be employed. For PCDD/F, one sampling period of 6 to 8 hours is used.

(6)  Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC (OJ L 342, 22.12.2009, p. 1).

(7)  The monitoring only applies when the substance/parameter concerned is identified as relevant in the waste gas stream based on the inventory given in BAT 2.

(8)  Measurements are carried out according to EN 15259.

(9)  To the extent possible, the measurements are carried out at the highest expected emission state under normal operating conditions.

(10)  The minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every year or once every 3 years if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.

(11)  Generic EN standards for continuous measurements are EN 14181, EN 15267-1, EN 15267-2 and EN 15267-3.

(12)  In the case of process furnaces/heaters with a total rated thermal input of less than 100 MW operated less than 500 hours per year, the minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every year.

(13)  The minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every 3 years if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.

(14)  The minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every 6 months if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.

(15)  The minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every year if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.

(16)  In the case of the production of polyolefins, the monitoring of TVOC emissions from finishing steps (e.g. drying, blending) and from polymer storage may be complemented by the monitoring in BAT 24 if it provides a better representation of the TVOC emissions.

(17)  In the case of the production of synthetic rubbers, the monitoring of TVOC emissions from finishing steps (e.g. extrusion, drying, blending) and from synthetic rubber storage may be complemented by the monitoring in BAT 31 if it provides a better representation of the TVOC emissions.

(18)  i.e. other than benzene, 1,3-butadiene, chloromethane, dichloromethane, ethylene dichloride, ethylene oxide, formaldehyde, propylene oxide, tetrachloromethane, toluene, trichloromethane.

(19)  For activities listed under points 8 and 10, Part 1 of Annex VII of the IED, the BAT-AEL ranges apply to the extent that they lead to lower emission levels than the emission limit values in part 2 and 4 of Annex VII to the IED.

(20)  TVOC is expressed in mg C/Nm3.

(21)  In the case of polymer production, the BAT-AEL may not apply to emissions from the finishing steps (e.g. extrusion, drying, blending) and from polymer storage.

(22)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the TVOC mass flow is below e.g. 100 g C/h) if no CMR substances are identified as relevant in the waste gas stream based on the inventory given in BAT 2.

(23)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 30 mg C/Nm3 when using techniques to recover materials (e.g. solvents, see BAT 9), if both of the following conditions are fulfilled:

| — | the presence of substances classified as CMR 1A/1B or CMR 2 is identified as not relevant (see BAT 2); |
| --- | --- |

—

the presence of substances classified as CMR 1A/1B or CMR 2 is identified as not relevant (see BAT 2);

| — | the TVOC abatement efficiency of the waste gas treatment system is ≥ 95 %. |
| --- | --- |

—

the TVOC abatement efficiency of the waste gas treatment system is ≥ 95 %.

(24)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the mass flow of the sum of the VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B is below e.g. 1 g/h).

(25)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the mass flow of the sum of the VOCs classified as CMR 2 is below e.g. 50 g/h).

(26)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the mass flow of the substance concerned is below e.g. 1 g/h).

(27)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the mass flow of the substance concerned is below e.g. 50 g/h).

(28)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 15 mg/Nm3 when using techniques to recover materials (e.g. solvents, see BAT 9), if the abatement efficiency of the waste gas treatment system is ≥ 95 %.

(29)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 20 mg/Nm3 when using techniques to recover toluene (see BAT 9), if the abatement efficiency of the waste gas treatment system is ≥ 95 %.

(30)  The upper end of the range is 20 mg/Nm3 when neither an absolute nor a fabric filter is applicable.

(31)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the dust mass flow is below e.g. 50 g/h) if no CMR substances are identified as relevant in the dust based on the inventory given in BAT 2.

(32)  In the case of the production of complex inorganic pigments using direct heating, and in the case of the drying step in the production of E-PVC, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 10 mg/Nm3.

(33)  Dust emissions are expected to be towards the lower end of the BAT-AEL range (e.g. below 2,5 mg/Nm3) when the presence of substances classified as CMR 1A or 1B, or CMR 2 in the dust is identified as relevant (see BAT 2).

(34)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the lead mass flow is below e.g. 0,1 g/h).

(35)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the Ni mass flow is below e.g. 0,15 g/h).

(36)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 80 mg/Nm3 if the process off-gas(es) contain(s) high levels of NOX precursors.

(37)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 200 mg/Nm3 if the process off-gas(es) contain(s) high levels of NOX precursors.

(38)  As an indication, the emission levels for carbon monoxide are 4-50 mg/Nm3, as a daily average or average over the sampling period.

(39)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 40 mg/Nm3 in the case of process off-gases containing very high levels of NOX (e.g. above 5 000 mg/Nm3) prior to treatment with SCR or SNCR.

(40)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to channelled emissions to air of ammonia from the use of SCR or SNCR (ammonia slip). This is covered by BAT 17.

(41)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the NH3 mass flow is below e.g. 50 g/h).

(42)  In the case of the drying step in the production of E-PVC, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 20 mg/Nm3, when the substitution of ammonium salts is not possible due to product quality specifications.

(43)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the mass flow of the substance concerned is below e.g. 5 g/h).

(44)  In the case of NOX concentrations above 100 mg/Nm3, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 3 mg/Nm3 due to analytical interference

(45)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the HCl mass flow is below e.g. 30 g/h).

(46)  In the case of the production of explosives, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 220 mg/Nm3 when regenerating or recovering nitric acid from the production process.

(47)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to channelled emissions to air of NOX from the use of catalytic or thermal oxidation (see BAT 16) or from process furnaces/heaters (see BAT 36).

(48)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the mass flow of the substance concerned is below e.g. 500 g/h.

(49)  In the case of the production of caprolactam, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 200 mg/Nm3 in the case of process off-gases containing very high levels of NOX (e.g. above 10 000 mg/Nm3) prior to treatment with SCR or SNCR, when the abatement efficiency of the SCR or SNCR is ≥ 99 %.

(50)  The BAT-AEL does not apply in the case of physical purification or reconcentration of spent sulphuric acid.

(51)  The monitoring only applies to emission sources that are identified as relevant in the inventory given in BAT 2.

(52)  The monitoring does not apply to equipment operated under subatmospheric pressure.

(53)  In the case of inaccessible sources of fugitive VOC emissions (e.g. if the monitoring requires the removal of insulation or the use of scaffolding), the monitoring frequency may be reduced to once during the period covered by each LDAR programme (see BAT 19 point iii.).

(54)  For the production of PVC, the minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every 5 years if the plant uses VCM gas detectors to continuously monitor VCM emissions in a way that allows an equivalent level of detection of VCM leaks.

(55)  In the case of high-integrity equipment (see BAT 23 b.) in contact with VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B, a lower minimum monitoring frequency may be adopted, but in any case at least once every 5 years.

(56)  In the case of high-integrity equipment (see BAT 23 b.) in contact with VOCs other than VOCs classified as CMR 1A or 1B, a lower minimum monitoring frequency may be adopted, but in any case at least once every 8 years.

(57)  The minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every 5 years if non-fugitive emissions are quantified by using measurements.

(58)  This standard may be complemented by EN 17628.

(59)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to plants whose total annual consumption of solvents is lower than 50 tonnes.

(60)  The lower end of the BAT-AEL range is typically associated with the gas-phase polymerisation process.

(61)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 2,7 g C/kg in the case of the production of EVA or other copolymers (e.g. ethyl acrylate copolymers).

(62)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 4,7 g C/kg if both of the following conditions are met:

| — | thermal oxidation is not applicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

thermal oxidation is not applicable;

| — | EVA or other copolymers (e.g. ethyl acrylate copolymers) are produced. |
| --- | --- |

—

EVA or other copolymers (e.g. ethyl acrylate copolymers) are produced.

(63)  The monitoring of VCM emissions from finishing steps (e.g. drying, blending) as well as from the transfer, handling and storage of PVC may be replaced by the monitoring in BAT 27.

(64)  Generic EN standards for continuous measurements are EN 14181, EN 15267-1, EN 15267-2 and EN 15267-3.

(65)  The minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every 6 months if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.

(66)  To the extent possible, the measurements are carried out at the highest expected emission state under normal operating conditions.

(67)  The minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every year if the emission levels are proven to be sufficiently stable.

(68)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the VCM mass flow is below e.g. 1 g/h).

(69)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 5 mg/Nm3 if both of the following conditions are met:

| — | thermal oxidation is not applicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

thermal oxidation is not applicable;

| — | the plant is not directly associated to the production of EDC and VCM. |
| --- | --- |

—

the plant is not directly associated to the production of EDC and VCM.

(70)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 0,5 g VCM per kg of PVC produced if both of the following conditions are met:

| — | thermal oxidation is not applicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

thermal oxidation is not applicable;

| — | the plant is not directly associated to the production of EDC and VCM. |
| --- | --- |

—

the plant is not directly associated to the production of EDC and VCM.

(71)  The monitoring only applies when the substance concerned is identified as relevant in the waste gas stream based on the inventory given in BAT 2.

(72)  Generic EN standards for continuous measurements are EN 14181, EN 15267-1, EN 15267-2 and EN 15267-3.

(73)  In the case of the production of casing, the minimum monitoring frequency may be reduced to once every month when continuous monitoring is not possible due to analytical interference.

(74)  To the extent possible, the measurements are carried out at the highest expected emission state under normal operating conditions.

(75)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to the production of filament yarn.

(76)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 500 mg CS2/Nm3 if:

| a) | both of the following conditions are fulfilled:






  — | bioprocesses (see BAT 35 b) are not applicable; |
| --- | --- | --- |

a)

both of the following conditions are fulfilled:

—

bioprocesses (see BAT 35 b) are not applicable;

| — | the CS2 recovery efficiency (see BAT 34) is ≥ 97 %; or |
| --- | --- |

—

the CS2 recovery efficiency (see BAT 34) is ≥ 97 %; or

| b) | CS2 recovery is not applicable. |
| --- | --- |

b)

CS2 recovery is not applicable.

(77)  The lower end of the BAT-AEL range can be achieved by using thermal oxidation or technique d. in BAT 34.

(78)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 30 mg/Nm3, when the sum of H2S and CS2 (expressed as Total S) is close to the lower end of the BAT-AEL range in Table 1.14.

(79)  Emissions to air refer to channelled emissions only.

(80)  In the case of the production of complex inorganic pigments, the upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 400 mg/Nm3 when condition b) below is met, and up to 1 000 mg/Nm3 when conditions a) and b) below are met:

| a) | the combustion temperature is higher than 1 000 C; |
| --- | --- |

a)

the combustion temperature is higher than 1 000 C;

| b) | oxygen-enriched air or pure oxygen is used. |
| --- | --- |

b)

oxygen-enriched air or pure oxygen is used.

(81)  The BAT-AEL does not apply to minor emissions (i.e. when the NOX mass flow is below e.g. 500 g/h).

(82)  The upper end of the BAT-AEL range may be higher and up to 200 mg/Nm3 when direct heating is used.

(83)  As an indication, the emission levels for carbon monoxide are 4-50 mg/Nm3, as a daily average or average over the sampling period.

---