alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8901]



[[Page 18242]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Collaborative Study on 
the Genetics of Alcoholism.
    Date: May 13-15, 2009.
    Time: May 13, 2009, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 
Military Rd., Washington, DC 20015.
    Time: May 14, 2009, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 
Military Rd., Washington, DC 20015.
    Time: May 15, 2009, 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 
Military Rd., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 2081, Rockville, MD 
20852. 301-443-0800. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bf9f9eee1fae8dbf6faf2f7b5f5f2f3b5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b79796e617a685b767a727735757273357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 10, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-8901 Filed 4-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
***EXHIBIT 32***

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Asia8, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Eric Montandon, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge        and belief:

|  | (1)      | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this report. |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: August 14, 2008         

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated        by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.                 A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

29
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# Time and Place: 

Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at EX-IM Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# Open Agenda Items: 

Item No. 1: Resolution presented to Linda M. Conlin, Vice Chairperson and 1st Vice President upon her resignation.

# Public Participation: 

The meeting will be open to public participation for Item No. 1 only.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Tele. No. 202-565-3957).

Kamil P. Cook,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E9-9511 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 5, 2019

p0329

Order 

Clerk

April 5, 2019

158068

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158068

COA: 336406

Wayne CC: 95-010246-FC

TYKEITH L. TURNER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address: (1) whether a legal misconception concerning a defendant’s sentence on one 

count renders the sentences for other counts arising out of the same transaction invalid; 

(2) whether the requirements for a motion for relief from judgment must be satisfied 

before a defendant may be resentenced on other counts where a change in the law 

requires resentencing for one count, or whether a trial court may exercise its discretion to 

resentence on other counts where resentencing is required for one count; and (3) if the 

latter, what parameters apply to the exercise of the court’s discretion when deciding 

whether to resentence on other counts. The time for oral argument shall be 20 minutes 

for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense 

Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Geotec Thermal Generators, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
W. Richard Lueck, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ W. Richard Lueck
W. Richard Lueck
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 321 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 321

   To provide for the status of the Northern Rocky Mountain distinct 
      population segment of the gray wolf, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2011

Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the status of the Northern Rocky Mountain distinct 
      population segment of the gray wolf, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Delisting Gray Wolves to Restore 
State Management Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. STATUS OF NORTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN DISTINCT POPULATION SEGMENT 
              OF THE GRAY WOLF.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), 
effective beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the final 
rule, entitled ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final 
Rule To Identify the Northern Rocky Mountain Population of Gray Wolf as 
a Distinct Population Segment and To Revise the List of Endangered and 
Threatened Wildlife'' (74 Fed. Reg. 15123 (April 2, 2009)), shall have 
the full force and effect of law.
                                 <all>
```
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1



# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted November 10, 201 6 *

Decided November 14, 2016



### Before

R ICHARD A. P OSNER
, Circuit Judge

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK
, Circuit Judge

D IANE S. S YKES
, Circuit Judge

No. 16

- 3041

S ANDRA R IEDERER
, Plaintiff

- Appellee

,

v.

U NITED H EALTHCARE S ERVICES
, I NC

. , Defendant

- Appellant

. Appeal from the United

States District Court for

the Eastern District of

Wisconsin

.

No. 15

- C

- 1292
William C. Griesbach

, Chief J udge

.

Order

Sandra Rie derer brought this suit as a class action on behalf of persons employed by United Healthcare, which asked the district court to refer the proceeding to a series of arbitrations, one for each employee. The district court denied this motion, observing that Lewis v. Epic Systems Corp ., 823 F.3d 1147 (7th

* We have unanimously agreed to decide the case without argument because the briefs and record adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and argument would not significantly aid the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).No. 16

- 3041 Page 2

Cir. 2016), held invalid a contractual waiver of employees’ opportunity to proceed collectively. United immediately appealed on the authority of 9 U.S.C. §16(a). It concedes that Lewis is dispositive but contends t hat it is wrongly

decided and asks us to overrule it. Yet Lewis was circulated before release to all active judges under Circuit Rule 40(e), and none favored a hearing en banc. There is an entrenched conflict among the circuits on the question in Lewis , an d this court’s reconsideration could not spare the Supreme Court the need to resolve the conflict. Multiple petitions for certiorari in cases presenting this question are pending before the Supreme Court. That is the right forum for United’s arguments.

A F FIRMED
Exhibit 10.2


 


ADDENDUM TO THE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


THIS ADDENDUM TO THE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
(the “APA”) is entered into on the 30th day of September, 2011 (the “Effective Date”), and relates
to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 5, 2010, as amended May 12th, 2011 and entered into by and between CelLynx
Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Seller”), and 5BARZ INTERNATIONAL INC., a Nevada Corporation (the “Buyer”)
as assigned to the Company on December 30, 2010.  Each of the Seller and the Buyer may be referred to individually herein
as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” 


 


RECITALS


 


	A	This Agreement provides for the acquisition by the Buyer of certain of the assets, consisting of intellectual property (described more fully below), currently owned by the Seller on the terms and conditions as amended and hereafter provided.   


 


B            Buyer
is desirous of purchasing the intellectual property from the Seller.


 


	C	The Parties have negotiated the purchase and sale of the Intellectual Property, discussing various terms and conditions, and desire to create an amendment to the agreed terms of this transaction.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, based on the stated premises,
which are incorporated herein by reference, and for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set
forth and the mutual benefit to the parties to be derived here from, it is hereby agreed as follows:


 


That pursuant to article 2.1 of the
agreement dated for reference the 5th day of October 2010
as amended, and further assigned, that the payment of the unpaid balance of $1,200,651  payable at the date hereof be
made payable, pursuant to this agreement on or before March 31, 2012.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Seller and the Buyer
have caused this Asset Purchase Agreement to be duly executed effective as of the Effective Date. 


	 	
         

        BUYER:

         

        5BARZ INTERNATIONAL INC.,

        a Nevada Corporation

         

        By: /s/ Daniel Bland                                       

        Name: Daniel Bland                                                        

        Its: Chief Executive Officer                                                               

          

        SELLER:

         

        THE CELLYNX GROUP, INC.,

        a Nevada corporation

         

        By: /s/ Norman W. Collins                                 

        Name: Norman W, Collins                                               

        Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of UCN, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian S. Moroney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    BRIAN S.
MORONEY                             
|                     |  |     |  | Brian S. Moroney                                    
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
The district court held appellant in contempt and imposed a ten-day

suspended jail sentence, ordered appellant to pay $300 per month until he satisfied the amount owed, and directed appellant to pay $2,286 in attorney fees. This appeal followed.

Having reviewed the record and appellant's civil proper person appeal statement, we conclude that the order challenged in this matter is not appealable. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). NRAP 3A(b)(8) allows an appeal to be taken from a special order entered after a final judgment. To be appealable as a special order after final judgment, the order must affect the rights of some party to the action growing out of the judgment. Gumm v. Mainor, 118 Nev. 912, 920, 59 P.3d 1220, 1225 (2002). Further, in the context of post-divorce proceedings, an order denying a motion to amend a divorce decree is appealable as a special order after final judgment, if "the motion is based upon changed factual or legal circumstances and the moving party is not attacking the original judgment." Burton v. Burton, 99 Nev. 698, 700, 669 P.2d 703, 705 (1983).

Here, the district court's order merely enforced appellant's obligation under the divorce decree. Neither respondent's motion to enforce the divorce decree nor appellant's arguments in response to the motion were based on changed factual or legal circumstances. Rather, in opposing respondent's motion, appellant was simply attacking the original divorce decree. Therefore, we conclude that the district court's order is not appealable as a special order after final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(8). Moreover, the portions of the district court's order imposing contempt and awarding attorney fees are also not appealable, and to the extent

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2appellant seeks to challenge them, he may do so through a petition for

extraordinary relief. See Pengilly v. Rancho Santa Fe Homeowners, 116 Nev. 646, 649, 5 P.3d 569, 571 (2000) (recognizing that a contempt order is not appealable). Having concluded that we lack jurisdiction, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

, J. Parraguirre

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Alfred D. Asti Jennifer S. Anderson Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 3
exv4w12w4






Exhibit 4.12.4




The taking of this document or any certified copy of it or any other document which
constitutes substitute documentation for it, or any document which includes written confirmations
or references to it, into Austria as well as printing out any e-mail communication which refers to
this document in Austria or sending any e-mail communication to which a pdf scan of this document
is attached to an Austrian addressee or sending any e-mail communication carrying an electronic or
digital signature which refers to this document to an Austrian addressee may cause the imposition
of Austrian stamp duty. Accordingly, keep the original document as well as all certified copies
thereof and written and signed references to it outside of Austria and avoid printing out any
e-mail communication which refers to this document in Austria or sending any e-mail communication
to which a pdf scan of this document is attached to an Austrian addressee or sending any e-mail
communication carrying an electronic or digital signature which refers to this document to an
Austrian addressee.




FOURTH SENIOR NOTES REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT JOINDER




     With respect to the Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2011,
among Reynolds Group Issuer Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware (the “US
Corporate Issuer”), Reynolds Group Issuer LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws
of Delaware (the “US LLC Issuer”), Reynolds Group Issuer (Luxembourg) S.A., a société anonyme
(public limited liability company) incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg (the “Lux Issuer” and,
together with the US Corporate Issuer and the US LLC Issuer, the “ Issuers”), certain Guarantors
(as defined therein) and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as representative of the Initial
Purchasers (as defined therein and, such agreement, the “Registration Rights Agreement”), for good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
signatory hereto (a “Guarantor”) assumes all of the rights and obligations as Guarantors under the
Registration Rights Agreement, in each case, as of the date of this Fourth Senior Notes
Registration Rights Agreement Joinder and as though it had entered into the Registration Rights
Agreement on February 1, 2011. The obligations assumed by the Guarantor under this Fourth Senior
Notes Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, dated August 5, 2011, shall be joint and several
obligations. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Fourth Senior Notes Registration
Rights Agreement Joinder shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Registration Rights
Agreement.



[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]





 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party hereto has executed this agreement this 7th day of
June, 2011.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	SIG COMBIBLOC LTD.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Name:
	 	/s/ Chiara Brophy
 

Chiara Brophy
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Authorized Signatory	 	 






Joinder to Registration Rights Agreement 

(Senior Notes — 2011)