alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code s. 1350

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 40-F of Manulife Financial Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 22, 2013



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Donald A. Guloien                             
|Name:     Donald A. Guloien                       
|Title:       President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GFR  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2004, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Marc  Casavant,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Marc Casavant
Marc Casavant
CFO, Director
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: November 15, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**§
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of SulphCo, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Larry
      Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael A. Abend, Interim
      Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Larry Ryan


Larry
      Ryan


Chief
      Executive Officer





March
      27,
      2007





/s/
      Michael A. Abend


Michael
      A. Abend


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer





March
      27,
      2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**From:** Nicole Singh [mailto:nicole.singh@rggi.org]

**Sent:** Friday, June 20, 2014 4:56 PM **To:** Harvey, Reid **Cc:** Lois New; Marissa G. Paslick - PSC - ; William.Lamkin@state.ma.us; Wong, Shutsu; Greene, Cynthia; Nicole Singh **Subject:** RE: RGGI Questions on 111(d) Hi Reid, We made some further refinements to the questions and incorporated into the agenda that was previously circulated by EPA. Please see below. If you have any question for us before the call, feel to reach out. Have a great week
- end. Best, Nicole 1) EPA walk through the methodology for translating the rate
-based target into a mass
-based target as applied to each of our states.  Our understanding is that the only way to convert from the RGGI states rate targets to a regional RGGI mass
- based target is w ith electricity sector modeling. Is that correct?  Without comprehensive modeling, is there any preliminary analysis we can use to estimate whether the existing regional RGGI cap will meet EPA's proposed emissions rate targets for the RGGI states and if no t, what changes would be needed in the cap? o For example, can we use anything from the EPA illustrative scenario modeling as a proxy for converting the RGGI state rate targets to a regional mass target? o Is there anything else the states could consider?  EPA modeling predicts emissions of 63 million for EPA sources for RGGI states in 2030; does this modeling include emissions from new sources and/or non

- 111(d) sources (e.g. combustion turbines)? 2) Discuss how the regional RGGI prog ram would demonstrate compliance. In particular, we need to identify any program design elements that would be inconsistent with, or pose special challenges to, using RGGI for 111(d) compliance.  The RGGI program includes the potential use of banked allo wances, potential for additional allowances being available from the Cost Containment Reserve and the use of offsets. How would these program elements be reflected in the states’ compliance demonstration?  How would RGGI states compliance demonstration dea l with sources not covered by EPA guidelines and new sources?  Please confirm that demonstration of compliance with a regional mass target on a regional basis is sufficient. Nicole Singh Executive Director RGGI, Inc. 90 Church Street, 4th Fl New York, NY 10007 212 -417 - 7345 (o) 646 - 675 - 7323 (m) nicole.singh@rggi.org
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Quest Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Vasant K. Jain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: November 13, 2009 | /s/ Vasant K. Jain                
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                        | Vasant K. Jain                    
|                        | Director, Chief Financial Officer,
|                        | Principal Accounting Officer      

---
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.  THOSE PORTIONS ARE DESIGNATED BY
      "******."






---

-
2 -







CONFIDENTIAL
      TREATMENT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS
      EXHIBIT PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
      AS AMENDED.  THOSE PORTIONS ARE DESIGNATED BY "******."


---

-
3 -







CONFIDENTIAL
      TREATMENT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS
      EXHIBIT PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
      AS AMENDED.  THOSE PORTIONS ARE DESIGNATED BY "******."


---

-
4 -







CONFIDENTIAL
      TREATMENT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS
      EXHIBIT PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
      AS AMENDED.  THOSE PORTIONS ARE DESIGNATED BY "******."


---

-
5 -







CONFIDENTIAL
      TREATMENT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS
      EXHIBIT PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
      AS AMENDED.  THOSE PORTIONS ARE DESIGNATED BY "******."


---
Mr. Todd Homan**·~.+** Director, Office ofAviation Analysis Nov. 1, 2014 US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave SE ; I Washington D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. Homan, My name is Albert Kookesh. I am a resident ofAngoon, Alaska. I am also former member ofthe Alaska State Legislature, having served in the Alaska State House for eightyears and the Alaska State Senate fo" eight years. I am writingthis letterto objectto any consideration ofending essential air service between Angoon and Juneau for service between Angoon and Sitka. I have always objected to decisions being made in Washington D.C. that impact our lives in Alasi<z without consideration ofthe human elementthat suffer consequences as a result ofthose distant decisions. For your information, and for the record, our connection as a community and as a people has historically been Juneau. Sitka has never provided for any of our needs such as education, medical, food, automotive and boat repair or other survival needs. Ifthe decision is made to eliminateJuneau in favor ofSitka, all your decision will do will add afinancial impactto our daily needs. We will continue to use Juneau for all ofour needs butwill have to go through Sitka to Juneau. A financial burden many ofour people cannot afford. While Sitka may be a nice town and Harris Air a nice airline company, we ask you to considerthe human element in "essential Air Service". That human element ofthe negative impacton our people and our way of life that will be a huge impact. As an example, if Iwanted to go to Juneau to grocery shop at Costco, Walmart or Fred Meyerfor food, I will add two airline tickets to the cost ofmy groceries. Harris Airto Sitka and Alaska Air toJuneau. Sitka does not have a Costco, Walmart of Fred Meyer. This is atypical example. Please consider the human element and historical connection we have to Juneau in yourfinal decision. I and all ofthose individualsthat I know in our little community need our connection to Juneau.

Sincerely Sen. Albert Kookesh, retired Po box 91 Angoon, Alaska 99820 ( J
___________

No. 96-2649

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Bruce Raymond Swinton, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: July 5, 1996

 Filed: September 11, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In United States v. Swinton, 75 F.3d 374 (8th Cir. 1996), we affirmed

on all issues but remanded this case for an evidentiary hearing on a claim

of possible jury misconduct. The district court conducted a thorough and

full hearing on that issue and found that no such misconduct occurred. The

district court in conformity with its findings denied Swinton a new trial.

Swinton appeals.

We have considered the matter and reviewed the record as well as the

Anders brief filed by Swinton's appointed counsel.

We conclude that Swinton's appeal is without merit. We affirm the

order of the district court denying a new trial.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2842 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2842

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PCBTF with acid acceptor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PCBTF with acid acceptor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PCBTF WITH ACID ACCEPTOR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      1-Chloro-4-         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (trifluoromethyl)                                                  31/2015.......
                        benzene (CAS No.
                        98-56-6)
                        containing an
                        acid acceptor
                        stabilizer
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2903.99.08 or
                        3824.90.92)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.











_/s/_________________________


Ron
Ruskowsky


Chief
Executive Officer


August
13, 2010
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 0 6 / 2 4 /2015 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Summit on Climate Change and Health on 0 6 / 23 /2015 **SUMMARY :**  Laura Farris participated on a panel discussion on 06 / 23 /2015 to discuss the Clean Power Plan . The meeting was held in Denver , Colorado . The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Laura Farris, EPA Region 8 **External Stakeholders**  General public
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Edward Hebert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.





By:  /s/ Edward Hebert

Name: Edward Hebert

Title:   Vice President  Finance

Dated: August 16, 2010
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0292 SAT Date: 2/26/2013 Print Date: 2/27/2015

Related cases : Yes Health related cases: Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Yes Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: Forward
Keywords : Keywords: UNCERT- N EURO
Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0292 FATE: Estimations for typical n=1, Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 0.15 (E) S > 10 g/L at 25 C (E) VP = 1.9E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E)H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 3.94 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.04 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low - moderate PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate - rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is good through the lungs and poor through the skin and GI tract routes based on physical/chemical properties. There is uncertain concern for neurotoxicity as a are neurotoxic but are less likely to be active. Low moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100 daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 green algal 96-h EC50 >100 fish

_ chronic value >10 daphnid

_ chronic value >10
algal

_ chronic value >10
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions based on SARs for ; ecotox chemical class: with 91% < 1000 and 49% < 500; log Kow = 0.14 (EPI, representative structure with n=1); liquid with unknown mp (P); S = 87.8 g/L at 25 C (P); p H7; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3 and <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1000

SARs SAR Class Ecotox CategoryEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3125 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic staple fibers containing 

at least 85 percent by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 percent or 

more but not over 3 percent of water, raw white (undyed), crimped, 

with an average decitex of 1.3 (plus or minus 10 percent) and fiber 

length of 38 mm (plus or minus 10 percent). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic staple 

fibers containing at least 85 percent by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 percent or more but not over 3 

percent of water, raw white (undyed), crimped, with an 

average decitex of 1.3 (plus or minus 10 percent) and 

fiber length of 38 mm (plus or minus 10 percent). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3125 IS

1 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS CONTAINING AT 

2 LEAST 85 PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF ACRYLO3 NITRILE UNITS AND 2 PERCENT OR MORE 

4 BUT NOT OVER 3 PERCENT OF WATER, RAW 

5 WHITE (UNDYED), CRIMPED, WITH AN AVER6 AGE DECITEX OF 1.3 (PLUS OR MINUS 10 PER7 CENT) AND FIBER LENGTH OF 38 MM (PLUS 

8 OR MINUS 10 PERCENT). 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.08 of the Har10 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

11 acrylic staple fibers containing at least 85 percent by 

12 weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 percent or more but 

13 not over 3 percent of water, raw white (undyed), crimped, 

14 with an average decitex of 1.3 (plus or minus 10 percent) 

15 and fiber length of 38 mm (plus or minus 10 percent)) 

16 is amended by striking the date in the effective period col17 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

20 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.11



AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE



This AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (the Amendment) is dated as of November 9, 2004, and is entered into by and
between EDWARD DALLIN BAGLEY(referred to herein as the Holder, at its address at 2350 Oakhill Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121), and UCN, INC. (a Delaware corporation formerly known as Buyers United, Inc., and referred
to herein as the Maker).



WITNESSETH



WHEREAS, Holder and Maker have heretofore entered
in that certain Promissory Note dated December 1, 2002 (the Note); and



WHEREAS, Holder and Maker each desire to modify one of the provisions of the Note, and to otherwise ratify and affirm all other terms and provisions of such Note.



AGREEMENT



NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AMENDMENT is being executed by the parties in order to memorialize the intentions of the
parties.



Section 1. Payments. Interest payments
shall continue to be paid monthly. The principal amount and accrued interest, if any, on this Note shall be due and payable on January 5, 2006.



Section 2. Other Terms and Provisions of the Note. Except as amended in Section 1 above, all terms and provisions of the Note remain
unmodified and in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
each party hereto has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf as of the day and year first above written.



|          |  |                                         |  |                         
|--------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|UCN, INC. |  |                                        
|          |  |                                        
|By:       |  | /s/ Theodore Stern                      |  | /s/ Edward Dallin Bagley
|          |  | Theodore Stern, Chief Executive Officer |  | Edward Dallin Bagley