alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_2.htm











EXHIBIT 10.2


 


Management Incentive Bonus Plan


FY11


 


The Management Incentive Bonus Plan (“MIBP”) is the executive bonus plan for all executives1. The plan has two components and two steps.  The first component is to evaluate the executive’s performance against their MBO’s for the quarter resulting in an achievement %.  For example, an executive might earn 90% of their total eligible bonus by achieving 90% of their MBOs.  Once that bonus amount is calculated, it is applied against the Employee Cash Bonus Grid to determine the bonus to be paid.  The Grid includes two key performance targets for ARI, Adjusted EBITDA and Recurring Revenue (“RR”).  Based on the company’s performance in those two areas, the Grid dictates the ultimate payout of the MBO bonus as a percentage.  Below is a summary of the FY11 Bonus Grid:


 




	
FY2011 END OF YEAR EMPLOYEE CASH BONUS GRID







 



	
 

	 	
 

	 	 	
RECURRING REVENUE

	 
	
 

	 	
 

	 	 	$	16,699	 	 	$	17,051	 	 	$	17,402	 	 	$	17,578	 	 	$	17,930	 	 	$	18,281	 	 	$	18,633	 
	
ADJUSTED EBITDA

	 	$	2,295	 	 	 	25	%	 	 	40	%	 	 	50	%	 	 	60	%	 	 	70	%	 	 	80	%	 	 	90	%
	 	$	2,397	 	 	 	40	%	 	 	50	%	 	 	60	%	 	 	70	%	 	 	80	%	 	 	90	%	 	 	100	%
	 	$	2,473	 	 	 	50	%	 	 	60	%	 	 	70	%	 	 	80	%	 	 	90	%	 	 	100	%	 	 	110	%
	 	$	2,550	 	 	 	60	%	 	 	70	%	 	 	80	%	 	 	100	%	 	 	105	%	 	 	110	%	 	 	120	%
	 	$	2,677	 	 	 	70	%	 	 	80	%	 	 	90	%	 	 	105	%	 	 	110	%	 	 	120	%	 	 	130	%
	 	$	2,805	 	 	 	80	%	 	 	90	%	 	 	100	%	 	 	110	%	 	 	120	%	 	 	130	%	 	 	140	%
	 	$	3,060	 	 	 	90	%	 	 	100	%	 	 	110	%	 	 	120	%	 	 	130	%	 	 	140	%	 	 	150	%












If ARI achieved it’s RR and Adjusted EBITDA target, the executive would earn 100% of the eligible bonus from the MBO portion of the plan.  As an example:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
The executive has a total annual bonus of $40,000 or $10,000 per quarter.








	
  

	
2.

	
For the first quarter, the executive earns 90% of their MBO’s or $9,000.








	
  

	
3.

	
For the first quarter, ARI achieves it’s RR target of $17,578K.








	
  

	
4.

	
For the first quarter, ARI misses it’s Adjusted EBITDA target and hits $2,473K.








	
  

	
5.

	
The bonus paid to the executive would be $9,000 x 80% or $ $7,200 per the grid above.







 


All final bonus payments, and MBO attainment, will be reviewed and approved by the President/CEO.


 


_____________________________


 


1 VP of Sales also has a commission element to his plan in addition to the partition of his compensation that falls under the MIBP.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000754813
<NAME> MICROFRAME, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-96
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-95
<CASH>                                          19,225
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,375,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (75,091)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,281,731
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,708,127
<PP&E>                                         904,348
<DEPRECIATION>                               (430,518)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,158,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,356,549
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         3,714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,798,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,158,483
<SALES>                                      2,606,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,606,940
<CGS>                                        1,165,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,366,061
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (757,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (757,753)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (757,753)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        

</TABLE>
United Security Bancshares, Inc. Summary of Directors' Fees



 EXHIBIT 10.24 
 United Security Bancshares, Inc. 
 Summary of Board Fees as of May 17, 2007

 The United Security Bancshares, Inc. Board of Directors approved the following retainers and attendance fees for board and
committee meetings, effective May 17, 2007: 
 United Security Bancshares, Inc. 
  

			
	Retainers:	  	
		
	 Chairperson
	  	 $1,350/month

		
	 Secretary
	  	 $450/month

		
	 Assistant Secretary, Assistant Treasurer and Investment Officer
	  	 $300/month

		
	 Board Members
	  	 $600/month

		
	Board Meeting Fees:	  	
		
	 Board Members
	  	 $500/meeting attended

		
	Committee Meeting Fees:	  	
		
	 Non-Employee Committee Members
	  	 $250/meeting attended

		
	 Chairpersons of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating, Executive and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	 $400/meeting attended

	
	First United Security Bank
		
	Board Meeting Fees:	  	
		
	 Board Members
	  	 $400/meeting


  
 Additionally, any director
who lives outside Clarke County, Alabama is reimbursed for mileage for regular and special meetings and committee meetings attended that do not coincide with a regularly scheduled board meeting, and any director who attends board meetings or
committee meetings held outside of the director’s county of residence is reimbursed for mileage for meetings attended. 
 Non-employee
directors may elect to defer payment of all or any portion of their fees under the United Security Bancshares, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan, which was ratified by shareholders at the
annual meeting held on May 11, 2004, permits non-employee directors to invest their directors’ fees and to receive the adjusted value of the deferred amounts in cash and/or shares of Bancshares’ common stock.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2635 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2635

          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C5-8 
                        perfluorocarbonalkanes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C5-8 
                        perfluorocarbonalkanes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. C5-8 PERFLUOROCARBONALKANES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to C5-8 perfluorocarbonalkanes) 
is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF J.C.S., A MINOR

PETITION OF: L.W.P., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 77 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 56909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22711]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8025]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Tokyo 1955-70: A New Avant-Garde''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Tokyo 1955-70: A New Avant-Garde,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, NY, from on or about November 18, 2012, until on 
or about February 25, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 6, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-22711 Filed 9-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000755872
<NAME>                        KFP 85-LTD.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         229,560
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  53,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (12,473)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,005,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     932,311<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,005,634
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (21,839)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,839)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.75)
<FN>
<F1>NOTE: TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS AND TOTAL CURRENT
    LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE BECAUSE REGISTRANT
    DOES NOT PRESENT A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Bottling  Group,  LLC (the  "Company")  certifies to his
knowledge that:

     (1)  The  Amendment  No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
          for the year ended  December 28, 2002 (the  "Amended Form 10-K") fully
          complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Amended Form 10-K fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,  the  financial  conditions  and  results  of
          operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred
          to in the Amended Form 10-K.


                                                   /s/ John T. Cahill
                                                   ------------------
                                                   John T. Cahill
                                                   Principal Executive Officer
                                                   and Managing Director
                                                   May 22, 2003

The foregoing  certification  (the  "Certification")  is being furnished  solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

A signed original of the Certification has been provided to the Company and will
be retained  by the Company in  accordance  with Rule  12b-11(d)  of the Act and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

DATE: 8/14/12

SUBJECT: West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP), 45 CSR 8- Ambient Air Quality

Standards

FROM: Asrah Khadr

TO: File

On February 22, 2012 (77 FR 10423), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPR) regarding the incorporation by reference of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone, 

nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and lead into 45 CSR 8- Ambient Air Quality Standards. An adverse 

comment was received regarding the removal of section 2 of 45 CSR 8, The Anti-Degradation 

Policy. The Anti-Degradation Policy was added by West Virginia in the 1970s as a placeholder, 

until West Virginia developed its Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting 

program in the 1980s. The removal of The Anti-Degradation Policy does not relax the West 

Virginia SIP because The Anti-Degradation policy was never utilized to enforce West Virginia’s 

PSD permitting program or West Virginia’s minor source permitting program; these programs, 

which are included in the West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP), are found respectively 

at 45 CSR 14 and 45 CSR 13. As previously stated, The Anti-Degradation policy was not 

utilized by West Virginia for the PSD or minor source permitting programs and was not used to 

impose emission limits on sources in West Virginia; this fact was confirmed by the West 
2

Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) upon inquiry by EPA. In addition, 

WVDEP also confirmed that this SIP revision contains measures to prevent significant 

deterioration of existing air quality, which are found in 40 CFR 50.2 , which has been 

incorporated by reference by 45 CSR 8. Therefore, the removal of The Anti-Degradation Policy

is nothing more than an administrative revision.
EXHIBIT
      10.10

    


    Lee
      Johnson

    President

    lee@dotvn.com

     

    February
      20, 2007

     

    Mr.
      Mai
      Liem Truc

    36
      Ngo 84
      Ngoc Khanh

    Hanoi,
      Vietnam


    


    VIA:
      PERSONAL DELIVERY

    


    Dear
      Mr.
      Mai,

    It
      is
      with great pleasure that I write to you on behalf of the officers and directors
      of Dot VN, Inc. (“Dot VN” or the “Company”) to formally invite you to join the
      Company’s Strategic Advisory Board (the “SAB”) to serve on such SAB for a term
      of two (2) years. Your experience, wisdom and established commitment to
      assisting in the development of Vietnam and helping its citizens represents
      the
      core ideals of Dot VN. With your counsel and guidance, we hope to continue
      to
      nurture the growth of information technology and telecommunications in Vietnam
      in order to advance the development of the internet and other technological
      infrastructure and ultimately deliver critical services such as communications,
      disaster recovery, online services and education to major cities as well as
      remote villages and hamlets throughout Vietnam. It is our firm belief that
      together we will do great things for Vietnam and its people both from an
      economic as well as technological standpoint. 

    


    In
      connection with your appointment to the Strategic Advisory Board, Dot VN would
      like to request that you accept an honorarium in the amount of Five Thousand
      (5,000) Shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to be issued at the
      beginning for each year of service on the SAB. Additionally, we would like
      to
      offer to pay for all travel costs associated with your attendance of any Dot
      VN
      related event or meeting of the SAB and provide you with an additional One
      Thousand (1,000) shares of the Company’s restricted stock per event or meeting
      attended.

    


    If
      such
      offer is satisfactory, please signify your acceptance by signing this letter
      and
      returning it to the Company. Your time and consideration are greatly
      appreciated.

    


    
      	 	 	
              Sincerely,

            
	 	 	 
	 	 	
            
	
            	
            	
              /s/
                Thomas Johnson 

            
	 	
              
Lee
              Johnson


    

     

    Agreed
      and accepted, this ____ day of February, 2007

     

    
      	
            	 	 	 
	/s/ Mai
              Liem
              Truc	 	 	
            
	
              

              Mai
                Liem Truc
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1928

AFRAH SADIQ,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

No. 02-1306

AFRAH SADIQ,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (No. A72-418-396)

Submitted: August 7, 2002 Decided: August 30, 2002
2

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Garfield, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID GARFIELD, Washington, D.C.,

for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney

General, Donald K. Keener, Deputy Director, Alison R. Drucker,

Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated petitions for review, Afrah Sadiq seeks

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) orders: (1)

denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings (No. 98-1928);

and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration of the denial of her

first motion to reopen and denying her second motion to reopen (No.

02-1306). We have reviewed the administrative records and the

Board’s decisions and find that the Board did not abuse its

discretion in denying these motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2002);

INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny

both petitions for review on the reasoning of the Board. See Sadiq

v. INS, No. A72-418-396 (B.I.A. May 28, 1998 & Feb. 20, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED
EXHIBIT 3(i)(b) 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 

OF 

ARTICLES OFINCORPORATION 

OF 

H&L INVESTMENTS,INCORPORATED 

        The undersigned,CARMINE J. BUA, does hereby certify as follows: 

    1.                 I am the President and Secretary of H & L INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED, a          Nevada corporation. 

    2.                 The original Articles of Incorporation of H & L INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED,          were filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on September 23, 1996. 

    3.                 That the Board of Directors of said corporation via an Action By Unanimous          Written Consent of Board of Directors effective as of December 22, 1999, adopted          a resolution to amend the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation as          follows: 

        ARTICLEI. is hereby amended to read as follows: 

    1.                 NAME OF THE CORPORATION: ASIA4SALE.COM, INC. 

    4.                 The number of shares of the corporation outstanding and entitled to vote on an          amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is 1,000,000; that said amendment has          been consented to and approved by a majority vote of the stockholders holding at          least a majority of each class of stock outstanding and entitled to vote          thereon. 

**27**

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,617]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 17, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Ecoquest Holding Corporation, Greenville, Tennessee.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-8941 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P