alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 68450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27169]

[[Page 68450]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Notice of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board 
Membership

    The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces the 
appointment of members to the AHRQ Senior Executive Service (SES) 
Performance Review Board (PRB). This action is being taken in 
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), which requires notice of 
appointment of members to performance review boards to be published in 
the Federal Register.
    Members of the PRB are appointed in a manner that will ensure 
consistency, stability and objectivity in the SES performance 
appraisals. The function of the PRB is to make recommendations to the 
Director, AHRQ, relating to the performance of senior executives in the 
Agency.
    The following persons will serve on the AHRQ SES Performance Review 
Board:

Irene Fraser; Stephen B. Cohen; William Munier; David Meyers; Michael 
Fitzmaurice; Phyllis Zucker; Mark Handelman; Jean Slutsky;

    For further information about the AHRQ Performance Review Board, 
contact Ms. Alison Reinheimer, Office of Management Services, Agency 
for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Suite 4010, 
Rockville, Maryland 20850.

    Dated: November 5, 2013.
Richard Kronick,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-27169 Filed 11-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1354
JOHN W. ROBERTS, SR., Petitioner, versus JEWELL RIDGE/SEA B MINING; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-218-BLA) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 18, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John W. Roberts, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Dorothy L. Page, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order and Order on Reconsideration affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A.§§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Roberts v. Jewell Ridge/Sea B Mining , No. 96-218-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128855 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128855 COA: 258230 Allegan CC: 04-013757-FH DARIEL IRE HOUGH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the May 19, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Allegan Circuit Court for a determination of whether defendant was on parole when incarcerat ed on the instant charge, or whether he was entitled to sentence credit under MCL 769.11b be tween June 17, 2004 and August 20, 2004 , and for correction of the presentence report to accurately reflect the number of defendant’s convictions an d defendant’s parole st atus, if necessary. In all other respects leave to appeal is DE NIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be rev iewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

p1208 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 15, 2005

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of HotJobs.com, Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
Nos. 333-86409 and 333-38930 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 8, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HotJobs.com, Ltd. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and the
related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31,
2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K of HotJobs.com, Ltd.


New York, New York                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
March 28, 2001
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GFR Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc.
      (the "Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Wang, Zhi Dong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:





*   the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*   information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
      Wang, Zhi Dong


Wang,
      Zhi
      Dong


Chief
      Financial Officer





November
      16, 2007







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

         Our consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of the
periods indicated is set forth below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                               ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  2006         2005          2004          2003        2002
                                               ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------  -----------
                                                                          (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                            <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>

FIXED CHARGES:
     Interest costs                            $   13,620   $    6,766   $    6,711    $    4,692    $    5,942
     Capitalized interest                              --           --          260         1,558            --
                                               ----------   ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------
         Total fixed charges                   $   13,620   $    6,766        6,971         6,250         5,942
                                               ==========   ==========   ==========    ==========    ==========

EARNINGS:
     Net income                                $   21,464   $   21,913   $   20,351    $    5,913    $    5,769
     Add fixed charges per above                   13,620        6,766        6,971         6,250         5,942
     Less capitalized interest per above               --           --         (260)       (1,558)           --
                                               ----------   ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------
         Total earnings, as adjusted           $   35,084   $   28,679   $   27,062    $   10,605    $   11,711
                                               ==========   ==========   ==========    ==========    ==========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                   2.58         4.24         3.88          1.70          1.97
</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 0474

_____________________________
L ACHLAN R OTSCHREK , Appellant,

v.

R ONNIE W OODALL , Warden , New River Correctional Institution
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. David P. Kreider , Judge

. September 3, 2020

P ER C URIAM

. Appellee’s motion to dismiss, filed July 1, 2020, is granted, and this appeal is dismissed as moot.

B.L. T HOMAS , W INOKUR , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Lachlan Rotschrek, pro se
, Appellant.

Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


/s/ Horace J. Davis III
-------------------------------------
Horace J. Davis III
August 14, 2002
SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

JUSTICES

COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOVMTHCOA.ASPX

July 28,2015

David L. Reuthinger, Jr.

Webb County District Attorney's Office

1110 Victoria, Suite 401

Laredo, TX 78040

Armando Trevino

Law Offices ofRamos-Trevino

1519 Washington Street, Suite 1

Laredo, TX 78040

RE: Court ofAppeals Number:

Trial Court Case Number:

Style:

Dear Counsel:

04-14-00915-CR

2014CRS000311-D1

Adan Flores v.The State of Texas

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210)335-2762

The above cause has been set for formal submission and oral argument before this Court

on Tuesday, September 15, 2015, at 1:30 PM, before a panel consisting of Justice Rebeca C.

Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, and Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa.

Argument is limited to twenty (20) minutes to each side and ten (10) minutes rebuttal for

the appellant. If you do not wish to present argument, you must notify this Court in writing

within seven (7) days ofreceiving this notice.

The Court provides a guest WiFi network for parties arguing before the Court. The

password to access the network is available at the Clerk's Office on the day of argument.

Very truly yours,

.artmez,
To: Federal Aviation Administration

From: Jesse Werle 

Subject: Petition to Amend Exemption No. 13612

Date: 30 November 2015 

This letter is to create an amendment to the current FAA Section 333 Exemption granted to Jesse Werle 

granted on the 16 day of November 2015. The Exemption Number is 13612, and the Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2015-3761. I would like to amend the following airframes: 

Airframe Manual 

Inspire 1 http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.0_en.pdf

Phantom 3 

Professional 

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_

v1.0_en.pdf

S900 http://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/s900/en/S900_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

S1000 `http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/s1000/en/S1000_User_Manual_v1.00_en.pdf

Iris+ https://3drobotics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/IRIS-Operation-Manual-v6.pdf

3DR x8 https://3drobotics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/RTF-X8-Manual-V2.pdf

Allowing these aircraft to be amended to the current 333 request would allow us to expand to a more 

useful service. The Inspire one will be used to fly high-end Real-Estate missions, while the Phantom 3 is 

used for the lower-end Real-Estate production. The s900 and s1000 are also used to film large ranches, 

and film high value targets. These could include ranches, estates, historical monuments, and events. The 

iris+ as well as the x8 are examples for our sensory platforms. Both machines allow us to carry different 

sensor platforms that we develop, and aid in future development. 

Jesse Werle
Exhibit 10.15
  
 Re:
    
    Employment of David L. Lowrance as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer by Cumberland
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  st
 Compensation.




---



##### 



Additional Payments
   Employment at Will
 Confidentiality
 Discoveries and Improvements




---



##### 



Publication
 Litigation
 Competition




---



##### 



Conflicting Contracts
 Solicitation
   Return of Documents
 Remedies




---



##### 



Debarment
 Notice
 Waiver
 Entire Agreement
 Governance
 Enforceability
 Survival




---



##### 



Sincerely yours,CUMBERLAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC./s/ A.J. KazimiBy: A.J. KazimiChief Executive OfficerAccepted as to all terms and conditionsas of the 9th of March, 2011:/s/ David L. Lowrance

          David L. Lowrance
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00344-CR

IN RE Kevin Lamar JOHNSON

Original Mandamus Proceedings1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 19, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED AS MOOT

On May 31, 2013, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he asserts 

he has filed various motions requesting DNA/Latent Fingerprint Testing pursuant to Texas Code 

of Criminal Procedure 64.01, a motion for summary judgment, and a motion for appointment of 

counsel on June 16, 2010, January 19, 2011, and May 12, 2011. Relator asserts he wrote to the 

trial court on May 2, 2011, June 17, 2011, May 14, 2012, September 28, 2012, and January 24, 

2013, asking about the status of his motions, but he has received no response. Relator asks this 

court to compel the district clerk to provide him with notice of receipt of his motions and compel 

the trial court to rule on his motions. We have no mandamus jurisdiction over a district clerk 

unless the issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2002CR4779, styled State of Texas v. Kevin Lamar Johnson, pending in the 

227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr. presiding.

 
04-13-00344-CR

691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Relator has not established that the 

writ he is requesting is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Therefore, we DENY relator’s 

request that we issue a writ of mandamus against the district clerk.

However, this court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a 

district or county court in the court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce our 

appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). On June 6, 2013, 

respondent filed a response to relator’s petition, stating that the trial court has now appointed 

relator an attorney to represent relator in connection with his motions for post-conviction DNA 

testing. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

- 2 -
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE00114

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 19107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9495]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1148 (Final)]


Frontseating Service Valves From China; Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject 
investigation, the United States International Trade Commission 
(Commission) determines, pursuant to section 735(b) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in the United 
States is materially injured by reason of imports from China of 
frontseating service valves, provided for principally in subheading 
8481.80.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that 
have been found by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to be sold in 
the United States at less than fair value (LTFV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this investigation effective March 19, 
2008 (73 FR 16059) following receipt of a petition filed with the 
Commission and Commerce by Parker-Hannifin Corp. of Cleveland, OH. The 
final phase of the investigation was scheduled by the Commission 
following notification of a preliminary determination by Commerce that 
imports of frontseating service valves from China were being sold at 
LTFV within the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of the 
Commission's investigation and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of 
November 21, 2008 (73 FR 70672). The hearing was held in Washington, 
DC, on March 10, 2009, and all persons who requested the opportunity 
were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on April 21, 2009. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4073 (April 2009), 
entitled Frontseating Service Valves from China: Investigation No. 731-
TA-1148 (Final).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 21, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-9495 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
SCWC-19-0000697

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI‘I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

PAOLA IBARRA,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and

GUSTAVO FERREIRA,

Respondent/Co-Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-19-0000697; 1CPC-17-0001646)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Paola Ibarra’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on August 16, 2022, is 

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The 

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding 

scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, September 28, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000697

28-SEP-2022

11:40 AM

Dkt. 9 OGAC
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Susquehanna Media Co. (the Company) for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John L. Finlayson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ John L. Finlayson
John
L. FinlaysonChief Financial OfficerDecember 5, 2005
 81
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MineralRite Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guy Peckham, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








August 19, 2013
By:
/s/ Guy PeckhamGuy PeckhamIts:
Chief Executive Officer and President











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.