alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[derekltr102002.gif]

| |                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Ivanhoe Energy Inc.
5060 California Avenue, Suite 410
Bakersfield, CA 93309
Tel: 661-869-8339 Fax: 619-869-2820



October 2. 2006

Mr. Barry C. J. Ehrl, President and CEO

Derek Oil and Gas Corporation

1111 West Hastings Street, Suite 1201

Vancouver, BC V6E 2J3 Canada



Dear Barry:

Ivanhoe Energy has received your letter of September 12 and the Authorization for Expenditure to expand the Lower Newcastle steamflood with a vertical program. Since we have not planned for a vertical program, evaluation of your plan took a bit longer than expected. Although we recognize the potential of your proposal, we see many risks associated with it. In your letter you suggest removing Ivanhoe from the project in a "mutually beneficial manner". With this in mind, we propose selling our interest in LAK Ranch to Derek for $800,000.

The proposed sale of our interest is contingent on the execution of a definitive agreement (Purchase Agreement) between Ivanhoe Energy and Derek Resources. The Purchase Agreement shall supersede this letter, and will contain provisions customarily included in agreements between sophisticated parties in similar transactions.

If Derek as Buyer agrees to enter into negotiations with Ivanhoe Energy as Seller concerning the transaction contemplated in this letter, please execute below in the space provided and return to Seller one copy of this letter on or before October 13, 2006.

Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, either park may terminate the negotiations pertaining to the transaction proposed in this letter, with or without cause prior to the execution of the Purchase Agreement. In such event, the parties hereto shall have no further obligation hereunder.

This sale is subject to the approval of Seller's Board of Directors.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Joe Gasca

President



Approved this 20th day of October, 2006



Derek Resources, Inc.



/s/

B. Ehrl



Title: President and CEO,

Derek Oil and Gas Corporation
Unassociated Document




FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE


PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.


2011 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN







This FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made effective as of November 1, 2011, with respect to all Awards (as defined in the Plan) outstanding as of such date and granted on or after such date, by Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”).







WITNESSETH:







WHEREAS, the Plan was established by the Company effective as of February 25, 2011; and







WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to clarify the definition of Consultant;







NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved in Section 13.1 of the Plan, the Plan is amended as follows:







1.           Section 2.12 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:







“Consultant” means any natural person who, directly or indirectly, provides bona fide consulting or advisory services to the Company or any of its Affiliates pursuant to a written agreement, which are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, and do not, directly or indirectly, promote or maintain a market for the Company’s or its Affiliates’ securities.


 


2.           Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer on this the 1st day of November, 2011.








	
PREFERRED APARTMENT


	
COMMUNITIES, INC.


	  	  
	
By:

	/s/ John A. Williams 
	  	
Name: John A. Williams


	  	
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2883 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2883

     To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain footwear 
  consisting of an outer sole affixed to an incomplete or unfinished 
                                 upper.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain footwear 
  consisting of an outer sole affixed to an incomplete or unfinished 
                                 upper.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR CONSISTING OF AN OUTER SOLE AFFIXED TO AN 
              INCOMPLETE OR UNFINISHED UPPER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.35 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain footwear consisting 
of an outer sole affixed to an incomplete or unfinished upper) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-11045

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

JUAN JOSE HERNANDEZ DOMINGO, 

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent.

____________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency No. A098-801-117

____________________

USCA11 Case: 23-11045 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 08/09/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-11045

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Juan Hernandez Domingo seeks review of the Department 

of Homeland Security’s (“DHS”) February 21, 2023 order reinstating his October 2005 order of removal. The government moves 

to dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. Hernandez Domingo has not filed a response to the motion. 

The government argues that our decision in Jimenez-Morales 

v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 821 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2016) has been abrogated 

by later Supreme Court decisions and, thus, Hernandez Domingo’s 

petition is untimely. Alternatively, the government argues that the 

petition is premature as the reinstatement order is not final because 

withholding-only proceedings remain pending. We need not decide whether Jimenez-Morales has been abrogated because we lack 

jurisdiction in any event. 

If the reinstatement order was final when DHS issued it on 

February 21, 2023, the petition for review is untimely and we lack 

jurisdiction to consider it. In that case, the statutory time limit required Hernandez Domingo to file his petition for review no later 

than March 23, 2023, which was 30 days after DHS issued the February 21, 2023 reinstatement order, and Hernandez Domingo did 

not file his petition until April 3, 2023. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1)

(“The petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after 

the date of the final order of removal.”); Avila v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 560 

F.3d 1281, 1284 (11th Cir. 2009) (holding that an order of 

USCA11 Case: 23-11045 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 08/09/2023 Page: 2 of 3
23-11045 Opinion of the Court 3

reinstatement of a removal order is reviewable on appeal as a final 

order); Chao Lin v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 677 F.3d 1043, 1045-46 (11th Cir. 

2012) (noting that the statutory time limit for filing a petition for 

review in an immigration proceeding is mandatory, jurisdictional,

and not subject to equitable tolling). If the reinstatement order has

not become final because the withholding-only proceedings are 

pending, the petition for review is premature and cannot invoke 

our jurisdiction. See Jimenez-Morales, 821 F.3d at 1308-09.

Accordingly, the government’s motion to dismiss is 

GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.1 

1

All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. 

USCA11 Case: 23-11045 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 08/09/2023 Page: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   599
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,971
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,372)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       599
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,336)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Derek Resources Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward G. Byrd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 15, 2004



DEREK OIL & GAS CORPORATION





/s/ Edward G. Byrd

_______________________
Edward G. Byrd

Chief Financial Officer and Director
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 08** 

**- 2**  **1 91** 

RORY MAYBERRY, United States ex rel.; ROBERT ISAKSON, United States ex rel. ,
Plaintiffs

– Appellants,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Party

- in

- Interest ,

v.

M ICHAEL BATTLES; SECURITY VENTURES INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED; DANUBIA GLOBAL, INCORPORATED; RICHARD LEVINSON; AMY CLARK; WINDMILL INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED; HANSFORD T. JOHNSON; DOUGLAS COMBS; SCOTT CUSTER,

Defendants

– Appellees,

CUSTER BATTLES, LLC,

De btor

– Appellee,

and

EMERGENT BUSINESS SERVICES; TARHEEL TRAINING, LLC; ROB ROY TRUMBLE; SALLYPORT GLOBAL HOLDING, LLC; JOSEPH MORRIS; JOHN DEBLASIO,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea st er n District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady, D istrict Judge. ( 1 :0 6

- c v
- 00 3 64

- LO

- T CB )2 Submitted : April 27, 2010 Decided: May 2 1, 2010

Before KING, SHEDD , and D AVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Victor Aronoff Kubli, KUBLI & ASSO CIATES, P.C., Vienna , Virginia, for Appellant s
. Craig Crandall Reilly, Alexandria, Virginia ; Peter Barton Hutt, II, Duncan Stevens, AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLP, Washington, D.C. ; Eugene Andrew Burcher, WALSH COLUCCI L UBELEY E M RICH & WALSH, PC, Prince William, Virginia ; Scott Custer, Bradenton, Florida, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Rory Mayberry and Robert Isakson appeal the district

court ’ s order accepting the recommendat ion of th e magistrate

judge , granting the motion for Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 sanctions,

dismissing th is action with prejudice, and awarding reasonable

expenses and fees to Defendants . We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court in its opinion from the

bench

. Mayberry v. Battles , No. 1:06

- cv

- 00364

- LO

- TCB (E.D. Va.

Oct. 10, 2008) . We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materi als before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3163 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Sodium monochloroacetate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Sodium 

monochloroacetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SODIUM MONOCHLOROACETATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.34 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 chloroacetic acid, sodium salt) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3163 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 024 Attachment Name CAS RN 1456803-12-5 Manufacturing Process and Impurity Profile Associated PMN Section Number N/A Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  Garner
Investments,  Inc. for the year ended  December 31, 2010,  I, Michael R. Butler,
Secretary/Treasurer  and  Principal  Accounting  Officer of Garner  Investments,
Inc., hereby certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

c)   such Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Garner  Investments,  Inc. for the year
     ended December 31, 2010,  fully complies with the  requirements  of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

d)   the  information  contained  in such  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Garner
     Investments, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Garner Investments, Inc.

Date:  April 14, 2011


                            /s/Michael C. Butler
                            --------------------------------------
                            Michael C. Butler, Secretary/Treasurer
                            (Principal Accounting Officer)



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 15.2

4 March 2016

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F. Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-7561

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have read the statements made pursuant to Item 16F
(a) of Form 20-F in the paragraphs entitled Deloittes reports in the past two yearson page 181 andAuditoron page 196 of Santander UK plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F dated 4 March 2016, and
we agree with the statements therein.



|                
|----------------
|Yours truly,    
|                
|/s/ Deloitte LLP
|Deloitte LLP
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (No. 333-104168) and S-8 (No. 333-39000, 333-88227,
333-86714) of Vixel Corporation of our report dated January 28, 2003, except as
to the second paragraphs of Note 9, Legal Proceedings, and of Note 10 and Note
16 as to which the date is March 3, 2003, relating to the financial statements,
which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated January 28, 2003 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers
Seattle, Washington
July 1, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 29664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12489]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add products to the Procurement 
List that will be furnished by the nonprofit agency employing persons 
who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    Comments Must be Received on Or Before: 6/22/2015

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia, 22202-
4149.

For Further Information Or To Submit Comments Contact: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the products listed below from the nonprofit agency employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following products are proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agency listed:

Products

Product Name/NSN(s): Bag, Insulated, Thermal, Reusable
    MR 408--Small
    MR 409--Large
Mandatory Purchase for: Requirements of military commissaries and 
exchanges as aggregated by the Defense Commissary Agency
Mandatory Source of Supply: Industries for the Blind, Inc., West 
Allis, WI
Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA
Distribution: C-List

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-12489 Filed 5-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

B&B BOWLING, LLC d/b/a STRIKES @ BOCA,

Appellant,

v.

CRVII BOCA TC, L.P., and CYPRESS REALTY OF FLORIDA, LLC,

Appellees.

No. 4D23-537

[August 3, 2023]

Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jaimie Goodman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502020CA007031XXXMB.

Ricardo A. Reyes and Carrie Stolzer Robinson of Tobin, Reyes, Alvares 

& De Biase, PLLC, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Bethany J.M. Pandher of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, and Stephen 

A. Mendelsohn of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

GROSS, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2825 

To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Red 1:1. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Red 1:1. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC RED 1:1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.23 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Basic Red 1:1) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

 

Misc. Docket AG No. 4

September Term, 2016 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

v. 

CLAIRE L.K.K. OGILVIE

Barbera, C.J. 

Greene

Adkins

McDonald

Watts 

Hotten

Getty,

 JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: March 6, 2018 

Argued: March 1, 2018
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND 

 * Court of Appeals 

 

v. * of Maryland 

 

CLAIRE L.K.K. OGILVIE * Misc. Docket AG No. 4

 September Term, 2016 

 

 PER CURIAM ORDER

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it 

is this 6th day of March 2018, 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the 

Respondent, Claire L.K.K. Ogilvie be, and she is hereby, disbarred, 

effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State 

of Maryland; and it is further 

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of 

Claire L.K.K. Ogilvie from the register of attorneys, and pursuant 

to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify that fact to the Trustees 

of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals 

in the State; and it is further 

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the 

Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant 

to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which sum judgment is entered in favor 

of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Claire 

L.K.K. Ogilvie.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 

 Chief Judge