Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 22, 2009 / Notices 18379 

Table 2 of this unit includes the 

names and addresses of record for all 

registrants of the products in Table 1 of 

this unit, in sequence by EPA company 

number: 

TABLE 2.—REGISTRANTS REQUESTING

VOLUNTARY CANCELLATION

EPA Company 

No. 

Company Name and 

Address 

70404 Ciba Corporation 

4090 Premier Drive 

High Point, NC 27265 

III. What is the Agency’s Authority for 

Taking this Action? 

Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA provides that 

a registrant of a pesticide product may 

at any time request that any of its 

pesticide registrations be canceled. 

FIFRA further provides that, before 

acting on the request, EPA must publish 

a notice of receipt of any such request 

in the Federal Register. Thereafter, the 

Administrator may approve such a 

request. 

IV. Procedures for Withdrawal of 

Request 

Registrants who choose to withdraw a 

request for cancellation must submit 

such withdrawal in writing to the 

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT, postmarked 

before May 22, 2009. This written 

withdrawal of the request for 

cancellation will apply only to the 

applicable FIFRA section 6(f)(1) request 

listed in this notice. If the products have 

been subject to a previous cancellation 

action, the effective date of cancellation 

and all other provisions of any earlier 

cancellation action are controlling. The 

withdrawal request must also include a 

commitment to pay any reregistration 

fees due, and to fulfill any applicable 

unsatisfied data requirements. 

V. Provisions for Disposition of Existing 

Stocks 

The effective date of cancellation will 

be the date of the cancellation order. 

The orders effecting these requested 

cancellations will generally permit a 

registrant to sell or distribute existing 

stocks for 1 year after the date the 

cancellation request was received. This 

policy is in accordance with the 

Agency’s statement of policy as 

prescribed in the Federal Register of 

June 26, 1991 (56 FR 29362) (FRL– 

3846–4). Exceptions to this general rule 

will be made if a product poses a risk 

concern, or is in noncompliance with 

reregistration requirements, or is subject 

to a data call-in. In all cases, productspecific disposition dates will be given 

in the cancellation orders. 

Existing stocks are those stocks of 

registered pesticide products which are 

currently in the United States and 

which have been packaged, labeled, and 

released for shipment prior to the 

effective date of the cancellation action. 

Unless the provisions of an earlier order 

apply, existing stocks already in the 

hands of dealers or users can be 

distributed, sold, or used legally until 

they are exhausted, provided that such 

further sale and use comply with the 

EPA-approved label and labeling of the 

affected product. Exception to these 

general rules will be made in specific 

cases when more stringent restrictions 

on sale, distribution, or use of the 

products or their ingredients have 

already been imposed, as in a special 

review action, or where the Agency has 

identified significant potential risk 

concerns associated with a particular 

chemical. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Pesticides 

and pests, Triclosan, Antimicrobials. 

Dated: April 7, 2009. 

Betty Shackleford, 

Acting Director, Antimicrobials Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. E9–8991 Filed 4–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[Docket# EPA–RO4–SFUND–2009– 

0235, FRL–8895–1] 

Helmet Products Fire Superfund Site, 

Griffin, Spalding County, GA; Notice of 

Settlement 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of Settlement. 

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA), the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency has 

entered into a settlement for 

reimbursement of past response costs 

concerning the Helmet Products Fire 

Superfund Site located in Griffin, 

Spalding County, Georgia for 

publication. 

DATES: The Agency will consider public 

comments on the settlement until May 

22, 2009. The Agency will consider all 

comments received and may modify or 

withdraw its consent to the settlement 

if comments received disclose facts or 

considerations which indicate that the 

settlement is inappropriate, improper, 

or inadequate. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are 

available from Ms. Paula V. Painter. 

Submit your comments, identified by 

Docket ID No. EPA–RO4–SFUND–2009– 

0235 or Site name Helmet Products Fire 

Superfund Site by one of the following 

methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/ 

sf/enforce.htm. 

• E-mail: Painter.Paula@epa.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Paula V. Painter at 404/562–8887. 

Dated: April 3, 2009. 

Anita L. Davis, 

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information 

Management Branch, Superfund Division. 

[FR Doc. E9–9226 Filed 4–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Public Information Collection 

Requirement Submitted to OMB for 

Review and Approval, Comments 

Requested 

April 14, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES