alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3183 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the use of domestic 

property to be eligible for certain tax incentives for solar energy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

the use of domestic property to be eligible for certain 

tax incentives for solar energy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF DOMESTIC PROPERTY TO BE ELIGIBLE 

4 FOR CERTAIN TAX INCENTIVES FOR SOLAR 

5 ENERGY. 

6 (a) RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENT PROPERTY

7 CREDIT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 25D(e) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 

10 the end the following new paragraph: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3183 IS

1 ‘‘(9) DOMESTIC SOLAR PROPERTY ONLY.—No 

2 expenditure relating to property described in para3 graph (1) or (2) of subsection (d) shall be taken into 

4 account for purposes of this section unless— 

5 ‘‘(A) more than 70 percent (by value) of 

6 the components of such property are made in 

7 the United States, or 

8 ‘‘(B) more than 50 percent (by value) of 

9 the components of such property are made in 

10 the United States and the final point of manu11 facture of such property is in the United 

12 States.’’. 

13 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

14 by this subsection shall apply to expenditures made 

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

16 (b) ENERGY INVESTMENT CREDIT.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 48(a)(3) of the In18 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

19 at the end the following new sentence: Such term 

20 shall not include property described in clause (i) or 

21 (ii) of subparagraph (A) unless more than 70 per22 cent (by value) of the components of such property 

23 are made in the United States or unless more than 

24 50 percent (by value) of the components of such 

25 property are made in the United States and the final 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3183 IS

1 point of manufacture of such property is in the 

2 United States. 

3 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

4 by this subsection shall apply to periods after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act, under rules simi6 lar to the rules of section 48(m) of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (as in effect on the day before 

8 the date of the enactment of the Revenue Reconcili9 ation Act of 1990). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1 

Janet Travis 

From: "Janet Travis" <jtravis@gilanet.net> 

To: ''pat mariella" <patricia.mariella@gric.nsn.us> 

Cc: <wantone3@gilanet.net>; "russell betsuie" <rbetsuie@gilanet.net>; "rnargaret wok" 

<margaret.wok@gric.nsn.us>; "Leroy Wllliarns" <williams@gilanet.net>; "Darrell Gerlaugh" 

<Darrell.Gerlaugh@gric.nsn.us>; "dan blaif <air@gilanet.net> 

Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 3:37 PM 

Subject: district mtgs. schedule revised June I 

Here's how it stands at the moment: 

D-I June 13 Pat 

D-2 June 13 Janet 

D-3 June 14 Dan & Janet 

D-4 done 5/31 

D-5 June 13 Dan 

D6 done 5/23 

D-7 June 20 Margaret
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of Pamela C. McGuire and Steven M. Rapp, signing singly, the
undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to execute and file on behalf of
the undersigned in the undersigned's capacity as a Managing Director or
Principal Officer of Bottling Group, LLC ("Bottling LLC") any amendment or
supplement to Bottling LLC's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 30, 2000, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock
exchange or any governmental official or agency, with all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, and each of such attorneys-in-fact
shall have the power to act hereunder with or without the other.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument as of March
28, 2001.

                                    Bottling Group, LLC

                                    By: /s/ Pamela C. McGuire
                                        ---------------------
                                        Pamela C. McGuire
                                        Managing Director


/s/ Craig E. Weatherup            Principal Executive Officer     March 28, 2001
-------------------------
Craig E. Weatherup

/s/ Lionel L. Nowell, III         Principal Financial Officer     March 28, 2001
-------------------------
Lionel L. Nowell, III

/s/ Andrea L. Forster             Principal Accounting Officer    March 28, 2001
-------------------------
Andrea L. Forster

/s/ John T. Cahill                Managing Director               March 28, 2001
-------------------------
John T. Cahill

/s/ Pamela C. McGuire             Managing Director               March 28, 2001
-------------------------
Pamela C. McGuire

/s/ Matthew M. McKenna            Managing Director               March 28, 2001
-------------------------
Matthew M. McKenna
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERTO TREJO , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 12

- 1579

[ March 4, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Richard Oftedal , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2007CF017817JXX

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Appellant, Roberto Trejo, was indicted for racketeering and conspiracy to commit racketeering. His predicate offenses included attempted first degree murder, shooting into a building, and three armed robberies with a firearm. He was also charged on substantive counts for the same five offenses. Trejo was acquitted on the racketeering, conspiracy, and shooting into a building charges, but convicted of attempted second degree murder with a firearm and the three armed robberies . We affirm on all issues raised in this appeal, including his fifty

- year sentence. The United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48 (2010) does not apply to appellant’s sentence. See Guzman v. State , 110 So. 3d 480, 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (holding that Graham

, which prohibited the imposition of a life without parole sentence on a juvenile offender who did not commit homicide, does not apply to a lengthy term

- of

- years sentence that might constitute a de facto life sentence).

As we did in Guzman , we certify conflict with Thomas v. State , 78 So. 3d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) and certify the following questions to the Florida Supreme Court:2 1. DOES GRAHAM v. FLORIDA , 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) APPLY TO LENGTHY TERM

– OF

– YEARS SENTENCES THAT AMOUNT TO DE FACTO LIFE SENTENCES?

2. IF SO, AT WHAT POINT DOES A TERM

– OF

– YEARS SENTENCE BECOME A DE FACTO LIFE SENTENCE?

Affirmed ; conflict certified; questions certified

.

G ROSS , T

AYLOR and L EVINE , JJ., conc ur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Asia4Sale.com, Inc., (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Eric Montandon, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

February 24, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas F. Cooke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.





By:  /s/ Thomas F. Cooke

Name: Thomas F. Cooke

Title:   Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 16, 2010
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

50039 Kline Township Cogen Facility 1

Daily Average Process Data for a 30 Day Period Including the Testing Date

Date Solid Fuel Firing Rate Coal Firing Rate (units) Heat Input Hourly Average Hourly average Heat Input (units) Average Heat Input (Btu/kwhr) Steam Output (1,000 lbs steam/hr) Unit Net Electric Generation (MWh) Unit Gross Electric Generation (MWe) Hourly Average Unit Gross Electric Generation (MWe) Day 1 25-May-10 1634tons/day 680.83 btu/hr 13349 484 1213 1397 58.21 Day 2 26-May-10 1586tons/day 660.83 btu/hr 13052 488 1201 1384 57.67 Day 3 27-May-10 1556tons/day 648.33 btu/hr 12798 489 1203 1384 57.67 Day 4 28-May-10 1620tons/day 675.00 btu/hr 13272 477 1210 1394 58.08 Day 5 29-May-10 1620tons/day 675.00 btu/hr 13262 481 1210 1392 58.00 Day 6 30-May-10 1568tons/day 653.33 btu/hr 12884 485 1205 1387 57.79 Day 7 31-May-10 1608tons/day 670.00 btu/hr 13361 485 1192 1373 57.21 Day 8 1-Jun-10 1645tons/day 685.42 btu/hr 13762 488 1212 1394 58.08 Day 9 2-Jun-10 1662tons/day 692.50 btu/hr 13867 487 1207 1391 57.96 Day 10 3-Jun-10 1655tons/day 689.58btu/hr 13724 490 1212 1397 58.21 Day 11 4-Jun-10 1673tons/day 697.08btu/hr 14176 481 1192 1375 57.29 Day 12 5-Jun-10 1610tons/day 670.83 btu/hr 13553 487 1200 1385 57.71 Day 13 6-Jun-10 1655tons/day 689.58btu/hr 13932 484 1200 1384 57.67 Day 14 7-Jun-10 1673tons/day 697.08btu/hr 13639 476 1208 1397 58.21 Day 15 8-Jun-10 1694tons/day 705.83 btu/hr 13754 474 1210 1395 58.13 Day 16 9-Jun-10 1466tons/day 610.83 btu/hr 13697 413 1051 1214 50.58 Day 17 10-Jun-10 1621 tons/day 675.42 btu/hr 13097 479 1215 1400 58.33 Day 18 11-Jun-10 1436tons/day 598.33 btu/hr 12567 442 1125 1305 54.38 Day 19 12-Jun-10 1487tons/day 619.58btu/hr 12264 474 1192 1375 57.29 Day 20 13-Jun-10 1656tons/day 690.00 btu/hr 13537 482 1204 1388 57.83 Day 21 14-Jun-10 1680tons/day 700.00 btu/hr 14172 473 1195 1378 57.42 Day 22 15-Jun-10 1661 tons/day 692.08btu/hr 14142 476 1198 1383 57.63 Day 23 16-Jun-10 1383tons/day 576.25btu/hr 12757 458 1156 1341 55.88 Day 24 17-Jun-10 1427tons/day 594.58btu/hr 12116 464 1182 1363 56.79 Day 25 18-Jun-10 1529tons/day 637.08btu/hr 12712 479 1212 1393 58.04 Day 26 19-Jun-10 1618tons/day 674.17 btu/hr 13560 482 1202 1385 57.71 Day 27 20-Jun-10 1707tons/day 711.25btu/hr 14240 485 1206 1387 57.79 Day 28 21-Jun-10 1742tons/day 725.83 btu/hr 15074 474 1181 1365 56.88 Day 29 22-Jun-10 1602tons/day 667.50 btu/hr 13763 479 1188 1372 57.17 Day 30 23-Jun-10 1579tons/day 657.92 btu/hr 13543 482 1191 1372 57.17
June 1, 2015

Mr. Andrew O’Fee

8126 Meadow Glen Drive Germantown, TN 38138

Dear Mr. O’Fee:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 30, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1355), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document











 



 
 

Exhibit 10.45    
    


        [Swiss Re Logo]  


ADDENDUM NO. 3 


to
the 


CASUALTY
EXCESS OF LOSS

REINSURANCE AGREEMENT

NO. POR327454

(hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") 


between



SAFETY
INSURANCE COMPANY

SAFETY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

both of Boston, Massachusetts

(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Company") 


and 


SWISS
REINSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION

Armonk, New York

(hereinafter and thereinafter referred to as the "Reinsurer") 


	I.
	It
is understood and agreed that effective as of inception Article III—Territory, is amended as follows: 



ARTICLE
III—TERRITORY 



This
Agreement applies to Policies issued by the Company within the United States of America, its territories and possessions, and Canada and shall apply tb losses covered hereunder wherever

occurring. 



	II.
	It
is also understood and agreed that as respects policies in force at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, September 1, 2007, and new and renewal policies becoming
effective on and after said date, Safety Property and Casualty Company is added as a party to this Agreement and in consideration thereof the respective section of the Preamble is revised to read: 


SAFETY
INSURANCE COMPANY

SAFETY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

SAFETY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

all of Boston, Massachusetts

(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Company") 


ALL
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED. 




1.
No. POR327454

    Addendum No. 3 









IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Addendum to be executed in duplicate, by their duly authorized representatives as of the following dates: 


In
Boston, Massachusetts, this 12 day of DEC, 2007. 



	ATTEST:	 	SAFETY INSURANCE COMPANY

SAFETY INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

SAFETY PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY
	

/s/ Glenn Hiltpold, FCAS
	
 	

/s/ Edward N. Patrick, Jr.

	

Glenn Hiltpold, FCAS
 Name	
 	

Edward N. Patrick, Jr.
 Name
	

Director of Actuarial Services
 Title	
 	

Vice President, Underwriting
 Title
	

And in Armonk, New York, this 17th day of October, 2007.
	

ATTEST:	
 	

SWISS REINSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION
	

/s/ Jeffrey Isaacson
	
 	

/s/ Matthew Fay

	

Jeffrey Isaacson
 Name	
 	

Matthew Fay
 Name
	

Vice President

Member of Management
 Title	
 	

Senior Vice President

Member of Senior Management
 Title





ds

Safety POR327454 add#3 




2.
No. POR327454

    Addendum No. 3 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.45
Order entered December 4, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01066-CR

SHARON HENNINGTON TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-20861-P

ORDER

The reporter’s record was filed November 20, 2018. Missing from the reporter’s record 

are:

 State’s Exhibit #3, labeled “CD/911”; 

 State’s Exhibit #92, labeled “CD/Donald Taylor’s Phone Records”; 

 State’s Exhibit #93, labeled “CD/Sharon Taylor’s Phone Records”; 

 State’s Exhibit #98, labeled “DVD/Interview”; 

 State’s Exhibit #500 (duplicate number), labeled “DVD/January 1st video”; 

 State’s Exhibit #700, labeled “DVD/Body Cam/Jessica Ryan”; 

 Defendant’s Exhibit #10, labeled CD/911 Call 2010”; 
 Defendant’s Exhibit #11, labeled “CD/911 Call 2013”; 

 Defendant’s Exhibit #12, labeled “DVD/GSR Kit Video”; and 

 Defendant’s Exhibit #20, labeled “DVD/Body Cam of Jessica Ryan”. 

All exhibits were offered and admitted at trial.

We ORDER court reporter Lisabeth Kellett to file a supplemental reporter’s record with 

true and correct playable copies of State’s Exhibits #3, #92, #93, #98, #500, and #700, and 

Defendant’s Exhibits #10, #11, #12, and #20 within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 333-90521) pertaining to the Barneys New York, Inc. Stock Option Plan
for Nonemployee Directors of our report dated April 28, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Barneys New York, Inc. and
subsidiaries and Barney's, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended January 29, 2000.



                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



New York, New York
May 12, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 249 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 249

 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that Act shall 
               not apply to any gray wolf (Canis lupus).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2011

Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Risch, Mr. McCain, 
 Mr. Kyl, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Enzi) introduced the following bill; which 
was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that Act shall 
               not apply to any gray wolf (Canis lupus).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF GRAY WOLF FROM ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973.

    Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Exemption of Gray Wolf.--This Act shall not apply to any gray 
wolf (Canis lupus).''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered February 2, 2017 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00046-CV 

IN RE MICHAEL C. WADE, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court 

Grayson County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 051329 

ORDER 

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Schenck 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s January 12, 2017 petition 

for writ of mandamus. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

 JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Siu Man Kwan, Chief Executive Officer of AAA Energy, Inc., certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AAA Energy, Inc.,
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of AAA
Energy, Inc.


/s/ Siu Man Kwan
- --------------------------
Siu Man Kwan
Chief Executive Officer
October 21, 2007