alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.1



AMERICASDOCTOR, INC.

Power of Attorney



Each
person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints C. Lee Jones and Dennis N. Cavender, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of and substitution and resubstitution, for him
or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign AmericasDoctor, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all
exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby grants unto such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or
desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his or her substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.



This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same document.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as of the 5th day of February, 2004.



|                                         |  |                                                       
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                                         | 
|/s/ C. Lee JonesC. Lee Jones             |  | /s/ Joan P. NeuschelerJoan P. Neuscheler              
|                                         | 
|/s/ Dennis N. CavenderDennis N. Cavender |  | /s/ Zubeen ShroffZubeen Shroff                        
|                                         | 
|/s/ Kevin T. WernerKevin T. Werner       |  | /s/ Christopher Steidle, M.D.Christopher Steidle, M.D.
|                                         | 
|/s/ Ira Klimberg, M.D.Ira Klimberg, M.D. |  | /s/ Claudie WilliamsClaudie Williams
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Steven B. Solomon, Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CT Holdings
Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: November 17, 2006


By: /s/ STEVEN B. SOLOMON
-------------------------
Steven B. Solomon
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3139 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3139

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cypermethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cypermethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYPERMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.74 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Cypermethrin) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

Order 

August 22, 2013

145631-2(112)(117)

_______________________________________

ANTHONY HENRY and KEITH WHITE,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

SC: 145631

v COA: 302373

Wayne CC: 10-000384-CD

LABORERS LOCAL 1191, d/b/a ROAD

CONSTRUCTION LABORERS OF

MICHIGAN LOCAL 1191 and MICHAEL

AARON,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

BRUCE RUEDISUELI,

Defendant.

_______________________________________

MICHAEL RAMSEY and GLENN DOWDY,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

SC: 145632

v COA: 302710

Wayne CC: 10-004708-CD

LABORERS LOCAL 1191, d/b/a ROAD

CONSTRUCTION LABORERS OF

MICHIGAN LOCAL 1191 and MICHAEL

AARON,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

BRUCE RUEDISUELI,

Defendant.

_______________________________________
2

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 22, 2013

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions by defendants-appellants to extend the 

time for filing their reply briefs are GRANTED. The briefs received on August 2, 2013, 

are accepted for filing. On further order, the motions by defendants-appellants for leave 

to enlarge the record are DENIED.

Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10477

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MARTIN TORRES-ORTIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:02-CR-00041-ALL-C

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Juan Martin Torres-Ortiz appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Torres-Ortiz contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Torres-Ortiz maintains that he
No. 03-10477

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the term of imprisonment and supervised release which may be

imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Torres-Ortiz acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Transaction Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence Chimerine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.





Date:  November 21, 2011/s/Lawrence ChimerineChief Executive Officer and PresidentFirst Transaction Management, Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request .





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
# L_2004337EN.01007201.xml

| 13.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/72

---

DECISION 2004/763/CFSP OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL

of 5 November 2004

amending Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP on the Mediterranean region in order to extend the period of its application

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Article 13(2) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Council,

Whereas:

| (1) | Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP of the European Council of 19 June 2000 on the Mediterranean region (1)expired on 23 July 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP of the European Council of 19 June 2000 on the Mediterranean region (1)expired on 23 July 2004.

| (2) | It is considered necessary to amend Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP in order to extend the period of its application, thereby allowing for a review of the European Union's relations with the Mediterranean Region, taking into consideration the evaluation of the Strategic Partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East by the European Council in June 2005 and the evaluation of the Barcelona Process in the framework of its 10th anniversary in 2005, as well as the evolution of the European Neighbourhood Policy during that period, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is considered necessary to amend Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP in order to extend the period of its application, thereby allowing for a review of the European Union's relations with the Mediterranean Region, taking into consideration the evaluation of the Strategic Partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East by the European Council in June 2005 and the evaluation of the Barcelona Process in the framework of its 10th anniversary in 2005, as well as the evolution of the European Neighbourhood Policy during that period,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

In Part V of Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP, the first sentence of point 36 (Duration) shall be replaced by the following:

| ‘36. | This Common Strategy shall apply until 23 January 2006.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘36.

This Common Strategy shall apply until 23 January 2006.’

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 November 2004.

For the European Council

The President

J. P. BALKENENDE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 183, 22.7.2000, p. 5.

1

---
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10735

Summary Calendar

Lew S. McGinnis, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company; James 

A. Mueller; Agency Services of Arkansas Incorporated, 

doing business as The ASA Group, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:20-CV-3138

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Plaintiff–Appellant Lew McGinnis filed suit against Defendants–

Appellees Nationwide, James Mueller, and The ASA Group in the United 

States District Court for the Northern District of Texas based on diversity 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10735 Document: 00516227136 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
No. 21-10735

2

jurisdiction. Nationwide moved to dismiss, asserting that the court lacked 

subject matter jurisdiction because McGinnis and Mueller were both citizens 

of Oklahoma. Concluding that McGinnis was unable to adduce sufficient 

evidence demonstrating diverse citizenship, the district court dismissed the 

case. McGinnis timely appealed.

Following the dismissal, however, McGinnis also filed a nearly 

identical complaint against the same defendants in Texas state court in the 

same county as this case. Nationwide removed that action to the federal 

district court for the Northern District of Texas based on diversity 

jurisdiction.1

 We sought supplemental briefing to address whether this 

appeal was mooted by the pendency of the second action (i.e., the same 

lawsuit pending in the same federal district court division).

Nationwide has explicitly stated that this appeal is now moot since 

there is no relevant difference between the more recently filed case and this 

case. Given Nationwide’s express admission to the lack of any claimed 

different defenses based upon the timing of the second case compared to the 

first case (such that there would be express judicial estoppel as to the same), 

we agree that this appeal is moot, and therefore, DISMISSED. All pending 

motions are DENIED as moot.

1 Nationwide asserted that McGinnis had become a citizen of Texas in the nine 

months between the filing of this action and the filing of the state court action. We take 

judicial notice of the second action filed in state court and its removal to the Northern 

District of Texas. See Taylor v. Charter Med. Corp., 162 F.3d 827, 830–31 (5th Cir. 1998). 

The second action is currently stayed pending the resolution of this appeal. Order, 

McGinnis v. Nationwide Life & Annuity Ins. Co., No. 3:21-CV-1988 (Dkt. No. 33, 1). 

Case: 21-10735 Document: 00516227136 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the
Annual Report of inContact, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Jarman, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 11, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    PAUL
JARMAN                              
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Paul Jarman Director and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2015-5914

Docket Number

2014-SW-056-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket – NPRM

Airbus Helicopters Gazelle work card 65.12.607, dated August 2008; and

Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin No. SA341/SA342-05.40, Revision 0, 

dated April 28, 2014.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-321

Fort Worth, Texas 76177

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Intersil Corporation (Intersil), that the quarterly report of Intersil on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Intersil.



|                       |  |     |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard M. Beyer                    
|                       |  |     |  | Richard M. Beyer Chief Executive
Officer
|                       |  |    
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ David A. Zinsner                    
|                       |  |     |  | David A. Zinsner Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Medizone International, Inc., for the quarter ended ended March 31, 2004 as
filed June 23, 2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Medizone International, Inc.


Date:  June 22, 2004                /s/ Edwin G. Marshall
       ---------------------        -------------------------------------------
                                    Edwin G. Marshall
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

250) ll-K- (I) -63 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57AM Sheet 250 of 325 
P.2 

M 

II-K-(I)-63 

FUEL PRICE FORECAST COMPARISON - ACID RAIN STUDY VERSUS 

MEFS. 

EEA, Inc. 

July 8, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-63
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3165 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3165

    To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Yellow 154.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Yellow 154.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 154.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.18 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pigment Yellow 154) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```