alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3154 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on acrylic filament 

tow imported in the form of 8 sub-bundles crimped together, each containing 24,000 filaments (plus or minus 10 percent). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

acrylic filament tow imported in the form of 8 subbundles crimped together, each containing 24,000 filaments (plus or minus 10 percent). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC FILAMENT TOW IMPORTED IN THE 

4 FORM OF 8 SUB-BUNDLES CRIMPED TO5 GETHER, EACH CONTAINING 24,000 FILA6 MENTS (PLUS OR MINUS 10 PERCENT). 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.21 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3154 IS

1 acrylic filament tow imported in the form of 8 sub-bundles 

2 crimped together, each containing 24,000 filaments (plus 

3 or minus 10 percent)) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘1.2%’’ in the column 1 general 

5 rate of duty column and inserting ‘‘Free’’; and 

6 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

7 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
O t h e r Corr e s pond e n ce / M i s ce l la n e ou s D o c u me n t s
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-30360

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Christopher Joe Stamper, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:19-CR-33-1

Before Davis, Stewart, and Dennis, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Christopher Joe Stamper pleaded guilty to receipt of child 

pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A). The district court 

sentenced him within the advisory guidelines range to 240 months of 

imprisonment and 10 years of supervised release.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 4, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-30360 Document: 00515766909 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2021
No. 20-30360

2

Stamper, who has not yet been released on supervision, challenges a 

special condition of his supervised release. That condition states that 

Stamper “shall not participate in any voluntary activities requiring 

unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18 without the approval 

of the probation officer.” He argues on appeal that this condition, to the 

extent that it restricts his access to his own children, (1) is unreasonably 

overbroad, (2) is a greater deprivation of his liberty than is necessary to 

accomplish the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), (3) is not justified by 

the record facts, and (4) violates his constitutional right to maintain intimate 

human relationships. The Government argues that Stamper’s challenge is 

not ripe for review.

We review questions of ripeness de novo. United States v. Magana, 

837 F.3d 457, 459 (5th Cir. 2016). Here, review of Stamper’s arguments 

demonstrates that his appeal “rests upon contingent future events,” i.e., his 

being released from prison while his children are still minors, his request for 

permission to have unsupervised access to his minor children, and the 

probation officer’s denial of such permission, “that may not occur as 

anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.” Id. (internal quotation marks 

and citation omitted); see United States v. Carmichael, 343 F.3d 756, 761-62 

(5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, because the issue Stamper raises is not ripe for 

review, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Magana, 837 

F.3d at 459-60.

Case: 20-30360 Document: 00515766909 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6547

RICHARD S. FETT, Petitioner – Appellant,

v. DIRECTOR, VA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-01129-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard S. Fett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard S. Fett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Fett’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
10

Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED

Boeing Steve Chapman Numerous Concur.

Boeing Tiffany Petit Numerous Concur.

Boeing Jim VanDen Brook Numerous Concur.

A4A Robert Ireland Numerous Concur.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3046 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain injection-molded ABS or PP 

cases or containers to be used for electronic drawing toys or electronic 

games. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain injection-molded 

ABS or PP cases or containers to be used for electronic 

drawing toys or electronic games. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN INJECTION-MOLDED ABS OR PP 

4 CASES OR CONTAINERS TO BE USED FOR 

5 ELECTRONIC DRAWING TOYS OR ELEC6 TRONIC GAMES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3046 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Cases or containers (provided 

for in subheading 

4202.99.90), made of injection molded ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) or 

PP (polypropylene), specially 

shaped or fitted for, and with 

labeling, logo or other descriptive information on the 

exterior of the case or container indicating its intention 

to be used for electronic 

drawing toys or electronic 

games of heading 9503 or 

9504 ...................................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CONSENT

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the annual report on Form 40-F of Cardero Resource Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:

1.

Technical Report dated August 6, 2005 entitled Geological Valuation report of the Pampa de Pongo Property, Arequipa Department, Caraveli Province, Peru prepared by Jan N. Helsen, Ph.D., P.Geo.; and

2.

The annual information form of the Company dated January 23, 2008, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the foregoing report, and the properties described therein.

DATED  January 29, 2008



/s/ Jan Helsen



Jan N. Helsen
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zhong Ya Li,
Chief financial officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 13, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Zhong
      Ya LiZhong
      Ya Li, Chief Financial Officer
November 30, 2015

Jeffrey L. Hebert

TDCJ No. 1082948

Polunsky Unit

3872 FM 350 South

Livingston. Tx. 7735!

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 05-02-00208-CR

Trial Court Case Number: FO 1-251 54-HN

Style: Hebert, Jeffrey Lee

v.

The Stale of Texas

I. The case has been submitted and is pending consideration.

2. The Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction writs and

habeas corpus. Please contact the Court of Criminal Appeals for any forms or

information.

3. The Court has no record of an appeal on file in the above referenced name or trial

court number.

4. Enclosed is a copy of the opinion in your appeal.

5. This Court does not appoint counsel

6. Neither the judges nor the staff of this Court can give legal advice. Therefore, you

may wish to conEact your attorney; the trial court; or the State Counsel for

Offenders, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, P.O. Box 4005, Huntsville, TX,

77342 for further information or assistance.
x 10. Enclosed please find the copies you requested. ( enclosed are I volume clerk

record, and 6 volumes reporter records as requested and paid for)

II. The cost for the copies you requested is

RespectfUlly,

Is! Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court

2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2969 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2969

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Hydrolite 6.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Hydrolite 6.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HYDROLITE 6.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       1,2 Hexanediol      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 6920-22-                                                  31/2015.......
                          5) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.11







CONSENT OF RODRIGO MARINHO




Reference is made to the technical report entitled “Caspiche Property Region III, Chile” dated September 13, 2010, which includes a mineral resource estimate prepared under the supervision of the undersigned by AMEC International (Chile) S.A. (“AMEC”) for Exeter Resource Corporation  (the “Technical Report”).




I, Rodrigo Marinho, hereby consent to the inclusion of references to my name and references to, and information derived from, the mineral resource estimate prepared under my supervision contained in the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Exeter Resource Corporation, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.













Dated this 29th day of March, 2011.




/s/ Rodrigo MarinhoName: Rodrigo Marinho
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA VI D P AT T E R S ON , P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. B E N C U R R Y , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 15898 D . C . N o . 5 : 0 8 - c v - 0 2 4 9 2 - R MW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R ona l d M . W hy t e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E an dM cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner D avi d P att er son app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. P att er son con t ends thatthe B oard’ s 200 6 d ec i si on t o d eny hi m parol e w as n o t s up p o rte db y“s o m e e v id e n c e ” a n dth e r e f o r e v io la te dh is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts .



# FI LED DE C 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 10- 15898

T h e o n lyf

e d e r a l r ig h t a t is s u e in th e p a r o le c o n te x t is p r o c e du r a l, a n dth e o n ly prop eri nq ui ryi s w hatproces s the i nm at e r ec ei ved, no tw hether the st at e c ou rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 13 1 S . C t . 85 9, 86 3 (20 11 ); R ob er t s v . H art ley , 640 F . 3d 1042, 1045- 47 ( 9th C i r . 2011) ( appl y i ng C oo ke ) . B e c au s e P a tte r s o n r a is e s n o p r o c e du r a l c h a lle n g e s , w e a f f irm . AF F I RME D.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31241

Conference Calendar

 

RAYMOND ROCHON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden;

RICHARD L. STALDER;

EDWIN EDWARDS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1701

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raymond Rochon, Louisiana prisoner # 93625, filed an action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various employees of the

Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections alleging

that prison officials were failing to protect him from his

enemies. The district court dismissed the action as frivolous

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and we review the dismissal for abuse

of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31-33 (1992) 
No. 96-31241

-2-

The fact that Washington attacked Rochon in 1988 does not

establish that Rochon was in any current danger from Washington. 

The prison officials have continued to house the two inmates in

different facilities, with the only lapse in the separation being

that Washington came to Angola to play ball. Rochon does not

allege that Washington attacked him or had any contact with him

at that time. Accordingly, the factual allegations in Rochon’s

complaint do not give rise to a claim of deliberate indifference

to his safety. See Neals v. Norwood, 59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir.

1995); Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). 

This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. 

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). We caution

Rochon that future frivolous civil suits and appeals filed by him

or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Rochon

is cautioned further to review any pending suits and appeals to

ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  Garner
Investments,  Inc.  for the year  ended  December  31,  2008,  I, Roy C.  Smith,
President and Principal  Executive Officer of Garner  Investments,  Inc., hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

a)   such Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Garner  Investments,  Inc. for the year
     ended December 31, 2008,  fully complies with the  requirements  of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b)   the  information  contained  in such  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Garner
     Investments, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Garner Investments, Inc.


Date:  March 27, 2009

                                       /s/Roy C. Smith
                                       --------------------------
                                       Roy C. Smith President
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)




This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2015236EN.01003501.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2015 — Bora Creations v OHIM — Beauté prestige international (essence)

(Case T-448/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark essence - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 236/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bora Creations, SL (Ceuta, Spain) (represented by: R. Lange, G. Hild and C. Pape, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Beauté prestige international (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 June 2013 (Case R 1085/2012-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Beauté prestige international and Bora Creations, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bora Creations, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bora Creations, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2896 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2896

            To suspend temporarily the duty on hexane, 1,6-
                               dichloro-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on hexane, 1,6-
                               dichloro-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEXANE, 1,6-DICHLORO-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Hexane, 1,6-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        dichloro- (CAS                                                     31/2015.......
                        No. 2163-00-0)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2903.19.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```