78726 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 249 / Friday, December 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0453; FRL–9904–35– 

Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; 

Volatile Organic Compound Emission 

Control Measures for Industrial 

Solvent Cleaning for Northwest Indiana 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a request 

from the Indiana Department of 

Environmental Management to revise its 

volatile organic compound state 

implementation plan (SIP) for industrial 

solvent cleaning rule for manufacturers 

of coatings, inks, adhesives, and resins. 

These revisions are approvable because 

they are consistent with EPA’s 

Industrial Solvent Cleaning Control 

Technique Guidelines document and 

therefore satisfy the reasonable available 

control technology requirements of the 

Clean Air Act. EPA proposed to approve 

these revisions on September 10, 2013, 

and did not receive any comments. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

January 27, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0453. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Anthony 

Maietta, Environmental Protection 

Specialist, at (312) 353–8777 before 

visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anthony Maietta, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 252–8777, 

maietta.anthony@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for the action? 

II. What action is EPA taking? 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for the 

action? 

On September 10, 2013, EPA 

proposed to approve rule revisions 

contained in a May 29, 2012, submittal 

from IDEM into the Federal Register (78 

FR 55234). The submittal requested that 

EPA approve a revision to the Indiana 

SIP regarding the industrial solvent 

cleaning rule for manufacturers of 

coatings, inks, adhesives, and resins. 

EPA received no comments on the 

proposed action. 

II. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving revisions to Title 

326, Article 8, Rule 17 of the Indiana 

Administrative Code (IAC) as submitted 

to EPA on May 29, 2012. Specifically, 

EPA is approving revisions to 326 IAC 

8–17–2, 326 IAC 8–17–4, and 326 IAC 

8–17–7. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Clean Air Act and 

applicable Federal regulations. 42 

U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, 

in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this 

action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by February 25, 

2014. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 249 / Friday, December 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 78727 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: December 6, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. In § 52.770 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by adding a new entry 

in ‘‘Article 8. Volatile Organic 

Compound Rules’’ for ‘‘Rule 17. 

Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations’’ 

in numerical order to read as follows: 

§ 52.770 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS

Indiana citation Subject Indiana 

effective date EPA approval date Notes 

*******

Article 8. Volatile Organic Compound Rules 

*******

Rule 17. Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations 

8–17–1 ......... Applicability ..................................... 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................

8–17–2 ......... Exemptions ..................................... 5/3/2012 12/27/2013, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT 

BEGINS].

8–17–3 ......... ‘‘Composite partial vapor pressure’’ 

defined.

1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................

8–17–4 ......... VOC emissions control requirements.5/3/2012 12/27/2013, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT 

BEGINS].

8–17–5 ......... Compliance dates ........................... 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................

8–17–6 ......... Compliance test methods ............... 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................

8–17–7 ......... Monitoring and recordkeeping ........ 5/3/2012 12/27/2013, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT 

BEGINS].

8–17–8 ......... Reporting requirements for monitoring and recordkeeping information.1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................

8–17–9 ......... Requirements on compliance certification.1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................

8–17–10 ....... Recordkeeping requirements for 

exempt sources.

1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–30543 Filed 12–26–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0286; FRL–9904–30] 

Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate; 

Exemption From the Requirement of a 

Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of copper sulfate 

pentahydrate when applied to all food 

contact surfaces in public eating places, 

dairy-processing equipment, and foodprocessing equipment at a maximum 

level in the end use concentration of 80 

parts per million (ppm). Toxcel on 

behalf of OhSo Clean, Inc., submitted a 

petition to EPA under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 

requesting establishment of an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance. This regulation eliminates the 

need to establish a maximum 

permissible level for residues of copper 

sulfate pentahydrate. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

December 27, 2013. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before February 25, 2014, and 

must be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0286, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West 

Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution 

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460– 

0001. The Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES