alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 23, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 3099 

PART 17—ENDANGERED AND 

THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 17 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531– 

1544; and 4201–4245, unless otherwise 

noted. 

§ 17.11 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 17.11(h) by removing the 

entry for ‘‘Puma (=cougar), eastern’’ 

under ‘‘Mammals’’ in the ‘‘List of 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife.’’ 

Dated: December 1, 2017. 

James W. Kurth, 

Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service, Exercising the Authority of the 

Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 2018–01127 Filed 1–22–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 665 

RIN 0648–XF881 

Pacific Island Fisheries; 2018 

Northwestern Hawaiian Islands 

Lobster Harvest Guideline 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notification of lobster harvest 

guideline. 

SUMMARY: NMFS establishes the annual 

harvest guideline for the commercial 

lobster fishery in the Northwestern 

Hawaiian Islands for calendar year 2018 

at zero lobsters. 

DATES: January 23, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob 

Harman, NMFS PIR Sustainable 

Fisheries, tel. 808–725–5170. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS 

manages the Northwestern Hawaiian 

Islands (NWHI) commercial lobster 

fishery under the Fishery Ecosystem 

Plan for the Hawaiian Archipelago. The 

regulations at 50 CFR 665.252(b) require 

NMFS to publish an annual harvest 

guideline for lobster Permit Area 1, 

comprised of Federal waters around the 

NWHI. 

Regulations governing the 

Papahanaumokuakea Marine National 

Monument in the NWHI prohibit the 

unpermitted removal of monument 

resources (50 CFR 404.7), and establish 

a zero annual harvest guideline for 

lobsters (50 CFR 404.10(a)). 

Accordingly, NMFS establishes the 

harvest guideline for the NWHI 

commercial lobster fishery for calendar 

year 2018 at zero lobsters. Harvest of 

NWHI lobster resources is not allowed. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. 

Dated: January 17, 2018. 

Alan D. Risenhoover, 

Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, 

National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2018–01064 Filed 1–22–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3064 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3064

To reduce temporarily the duty on girls' knitted or crocheted shorts of 
                           synthetic fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2012

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on girls' knitted or crocheted shorts of 
                           synthetic fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GIRLS' KNITTED OR CROCHETED SHORTS OF SYNTHETIC FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Girls' knitted or   23.5%        No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        crocheted shorts                                                   31/2015.......
                        of synthetic
                        fibers, the
                        foregoing not
                        imported as parts
                        of playsuits
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6104.63.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
June 7, 2010

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: In advertent Error in the Preamble to the Proposed National Emission Standards

for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers FROM: Mary

K. Johnson Project Lead Off ice of Air and Radiation TO: Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OAR- 200 6 - 0 7 9 0 We have identified an inadvertent error in the burden estimates for the proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and In stitutional Boilers , which was signed on April 29, 1010. Specificall y, the burden estimates included in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of the preamble ( 75 Fed. Reg. 31896 ) were preliminary

estimates, and the preamble does not reflect the updated burd en estimates. The current burden estimates associated with the information collection activities of the proposed rule are set forth in the Supporting Statement (see docket item EPA - HQ - OAR- 200 6 - 0 7 9 0 - 0031 ). The attached redline/strike - out version of the affected preamble section ( i.e. , page 31918 ) identifies the errors and shows the corrected estimate s. cc: Robert J. Wayland AttachmentThe annual monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping burden for this collection (averaged

over the first 3 ye ars af

ter the effective date of the standards) is estimated to be $ 523 551 million. This includes 3.6 million labor hours per ye ar at a cost of $336 million and total non - labor capital costs of $ 186 215 million per year. This estimate includes initial and annual performance tests, conducting and documenting an energy assessment, conducting and documenting a tune up, semiannual excess emission reports, maintenance inspections, developing a monitoring plan, notifications, and recordkeeping. Monitoring, testing, tune - up and energy assessment costs were also included in the cost estimates presented in the control costs impacts estimates in section VI .B of this preamble. The total burden for the Federal government (averaged over the first 3 ye ars after the effectiv e date of the standard) is estimated to be 767,403 hours per ye ar at a total labor cost of $37.6 million per year.
precoptics_ex1003.htm


 







EXHIBIT 10.3


 


ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE


 


Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.


New York, New York


October 31, 2011


 


The 10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010, July 26, 2010, September 15, 2010, October 15, 2010, November 15, 2010, November 30, 2010, December 1, 2010, December 3, 2010, and December 17, 2010, January 10, 2011, January 24, 2011, February 7, 2011,  February 25, 2011, March 11, 2011, March 31, 2011, April 14, 2011, April 29, 2011, May 13, 2011, June 3, 2011,  June 28, 2011, July 6, 2011, July 20, 2011, July 25, 2011, July 27, 2011, August 31, 2011, and September 30, 2011 (the “Note”) of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of Special Situations Fund III, QP, L.P. (the “Holder”) in an aggregate principal amount of $275,000 and to which the Endorsement is affixed is hereby amended in the following respects:


 




	  	
1.

	
The term “Stated Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “December 15, 2011.”


	  	  	  
	  	
2.

	
Except as expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.







 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed, and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.


 


 



	  	
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.


	  	  
	  	
By

	
/s/ Joseph N. Forkey


	  	  	  
	  	  	
Name Joseph N. Forkey


	  	  	
Title: Chief Executive Officer


	
Accepted:

	  
	  	  
	
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III QP, L.P.

	  
	  	  
	
By:

	
/s/ David Greenhouse

	  
	  	  	  
	  	
Name: David Greenhouse

	  
	  	
Title: General Partner
Follow-up on EE questions: Kevin Culligan to: cortney_higgins
03/14/2011 05:52 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Bill Maxwell, "Pielli, Katrina"

Link to the LBL study (also adding footnote to RIA)

The Shifting Landscape of Ratepayer Funded Energy Efficiency in the U.S., Galen Barbose et. al., October 2009, Lawrence Berkeley NationalLaboratory, LBNL-2258E (http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/lbnl2258e.pdf).

Were all estimates from LBL study? No, LBL study was used to characterize potential efficiency improvements from State programs. For the DOE appliance standards, we worked directly with DOE.

What DOE standards were included: Katrina Pielli at DOE (202-287-5850 could explain what standards were
considered

Was rebound effect included: - Yes for DOE standards (calculated savings using NEMS) - No for State Programs using LBL study

Were other interactive effects accounted for? Other interactions beyond the rebound effect for the DOE standards were not explicitly accounted

for.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,816,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  583,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      21,595,713
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,671,651)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,688,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,453,523
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,697,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,688,188
<SALES>                                      3,116,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,243,831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,811,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             323,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            108,624
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   108,624
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                  GENWORTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK

                    WAIVER OF SURRENDER CHARGE ENDORSEMENT

This endorsement is effective on the Contract Date. It amends the Contract
Value Benefits section by adding the following:

Waiver of Surrender Charge in the Event of Terminal Illness

We will waive the surrender charge for surrender of one or more withdrawals if:

    .  any Annuitant has been diagnosed with a terminal illness by a licensed
       physician; and

    .  which a licensed physician certifies is expected to result in death
       within 12 months of the certification; and

    .  the diagnosis was made at least one year after the Contract Date; and

    .  the surrender or withdrawal occurs after diagnosis; and

    .  we receive satisfactory proof that the Annuitant has a terminal illness.

Satisfactory proof will include a properly completed claim form and a written
statement from a licensed physician. The licensed physician must be someone
other than you, the Annuitant, or an Annuitant(s)'s relative. We reserve the
right to obtain a second medical opinion at our expense.

For Genworth Life Insurance Company of New York,

                                                  [/s/ David J. Sloane
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  David J. Sloane
                                                  President]

NY5346 3/07                           1
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2923 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of Propiconazole and 3-iodo2-propynol butylcarbamate and application adjuvants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 

Propiconazole and 3-iodo-2-propynol butylcarbamate and 

application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF PROPICONAZOLE AND 3-IODO-2- 

4 PROPYNOL BUTYLCARBAMATE AND APPLICA5 TION ADJUVANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2923 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of ( ± )-(cis+trans)- 

1-(2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4- 

propyl-1,3-dioxalan-2-yl)- 

methyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole 

(Propiconazole) (CAS No. 

60207–90–1), and 3-iodo-2- 

propynol butylcarbamate 

(CAS No. 55406–53–06) and 

application adjuvants (provided for in subheading 

3808.92.15) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 11, 2016

No. 04-15-00801-CR

Casey L. MULLER,

Appellant-s

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR7483

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due on March 24, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We granted 

in part Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief, and we set the brief due 

on May 2, 2016. On May 10, 2016, Appellant filed a second motion for a sixty-day extension of 

time to file the brief for a total extension of ninety days. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. Appellant must file the brief or a motion to 

dismiss not later than June 1, 2016. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE 

APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. 

If Appellant fails to file the brief or motion to dismiss as ordered, we may abate this 

appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See id. R. 38.8(b); 

Samaniego v. State, 952 S.W.2d 50, 52–53 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of May, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1995
<CASH>                                              49
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,345
<PP&E>                                           4,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,112
<BONDS>                                          2,638
<COMMON>                                         1,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,079)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,157
<SALES>                                            749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,959
<CGS>                                              375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (173)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    282
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GFR Pharmaceuticals,
      Inc.
      for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Su, Jie, our Chief
      Executive Officer, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.






/s/
      Su, Jie


Su,
      Jie




Chief
      Executive Officer








May
      20,
      2007







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2888 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2888

               To reduce temporarily the duty on Tinopal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To reduce temporarily the duty on Tinopal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TINOPAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2,2'-([1,1'-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        biphenyl]-4,4'-                                                    31/2015.......
                        diyldi-2,1-
                        ethenediyl)bisben
                        zenesulfonic acid
                        (Distyrylbiphenyl
                        , disodium salt)
                        (CAS No. 27344-41-
                        8) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2934.99.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: __2012________-NM-___032______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Hide Details EPA / ICAC Industrial Source Roundtable Meeting - SSM Thu 09/20/2012 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM A ttendance is optional for Lisa Sutton Chair: Phil Lorang/RTP/USEPA/US Location: Room C111B This entry has an alarm. The alarm will go off 15 minutes before the entry starts. This entry does not block your busy time. Required: Optional: Krishna Viswanathan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lisa Sutton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

_

________________ _ We only have 30 minutes for SSM, if one of you can attend so that any questions they have can be fielded by one of you, that would be great. Otherwise I will just take their questions and any that are not easy or obvious, I will take them down and commit to getting back to them. Let me know if either of you (or both) are available. thanks !

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

EPA / ICAC Industrial Source Roundtable Meeting September 20, 2012 Room C111B Agenda

9:30 -9:40 Introductions 9:40-10:10 RTR rules - Ongoing and Envisioned Activities (Steve Fruh and Brian Shrager, DescriptionOAQPS) 10:10-10:40 Oil and Gas Rules (Bruce Moore, OAQPS) 10:40-11:10 Petroleum Refineries (Brenda Shine, OAQPS) 11:10 -11:20 Break 11:20-11:50 Portland Cement Rulemaking (Keith Barnett, OAQPS) 11:50-12:20 Discussion, Q&A 12:20-1:00 Lunch 1:00-1:30 RICE Rules – An Overview (Melanie King, OAQPS) 1:30-2:00
N itric Acid NSPS ( N ate Topham and Bill Neuffe r , OAQPS) 2:00- 2:30 Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (Debra Dalcher and Matt Witosky, OAQPS) 2:30-2:40 Break 2:40-3:10Electronic Reporting (Robert Schell, OAQPS) 3:10-3:40 MATS Related Activity (ICAC) 3:40- 4:10 Industrial Trends and Road Blocks to Compliance (ICAC) 4:10-4:20 Wrap-up and identification of follow-up issues Matthew Witosky Policy and Strategies Group Sector Policy and Programs Division OAQPS 919-541-2865 witosky.matthew@epa.gov

Personal Notes