# i

**EPA REGISTRATION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTICIDE PETITIONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER**  **EPA Registration**  **Division contact: Laura Nollen, (703) 305**  **- 7390**  Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR - 4) Pesticide Petition Number 2E7991 EPA has received a pesticide petition , 2E7991, from Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR - 4) , Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey , 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton, NJ 08540 requesting, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 b y establishing a tolerance for residues of 1 -Naphthaleneacetic a cid (NAA) and its conjugates in or on the raw agricul tural commodities r ambutan at 3 parts per million (ppm) ; avocado, mamey

sapote and mango at 0.05 ppm; and fruit, pome, group 11 - 10 at 0.15 ppm . Upon approval of the aforementioned tolerances, this petition additionally requests to remove the tolerance for fruit, pome, group 11 at 0.15 ppm, as it will be superseded b y the tolerance on fruit, pome, group 11 - 10 at 0.15 ppm. EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of FDDCA; howev er, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may

be needed before EPA rules on the petition. A. Residue Chemistry 1. Plant metabolism. HED has n ow determined that the terminal residues of concern in plants are the parent compounds, NAA and its conjugates, based on the nature of residues identified from apple and olive studies [MRID 43948501 and 44190501] .1 2. Analytical method. The nature of the residues of NAA is adequatel y understood and an acceptable anal yt ical method is available for enforcement purposes. 2 3. Magnitude of residues. . Avocados

– All total NAA residues from five avocado field trials were <0.050 ppm at a 10 (+/ - 1) PHI after ea ch application. All total NAA residues were also <0.050 ppm in the decline trial. Rambutan

– The results from two rambutan trials show that the maximum total residue of NAA in rambutan fruit was 0.636 ppm after one application of NAA (90 ppm solution app lied to runoff) and a 2 day PHI. 2 B. Toxicological Profile 1. Acute toxicity. NAA and all its conjugates show low acute toxicity . 32 2. Genotoxicty. NAA and all its conjugates are not mutagenic. 3 3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. There was no evidence of developmental toxicity

at highest doses tested of 250 mg/kg/day in the rat or 150 mg/kg/day

of NAA in the rabbit administered b y gavage during the critical gestation period of pregnancy . Reproductive effects of NAA sodium salt occ urred at 210 mg/kg/day

and were limited to reduced litter survival and pup weight throughout lactation in both generations of offspring in a two generation reproduction study . Parental effects (reduced body weight gain and reduced food consumption) occurred at the same dose level . 4 4. Subchronic toxicity The most common short term effect from high exposures to NAA and all its conjugates is reduced body weight gain , seen at dose levels of 200 mg/kg/day

and higher. 3 5. Chronic toxicity. Repeated exposure in the oral toxicity studies primarily resulted in decreased body weight and body

weight gain accompanied by decreased food consumption. Other chronic effects included vomiting, stomach lesions and slight sinusoidal histiocy

tosis in the livers of males (dogs) .Studies in the rat and mouse have shown no evidence of carcinogenicity . 4 6. Animal metabolism. The metabolism studies of the acid and its acetamide and the ethyl ester i n animals provide supporting evidence that the toxicity of these various forms of NAA would be expected to be similar since all are metabolized to the acid form and eliminated from the body within 36 to 48 hours after exposure as gl yci ne and glucuronic aci d conjugates. 4 7. Metabolite toxicology . EPA has not identified any metabolites of toxicological concern. 3 8. Endocrine disruption . As the appropriate screening and/or testing protocols under the Agency ’s EDSP have now been developed and vetted, the naphthalene acetates may be subjected to additional screening and/or testing to better characterize effects related to endocrine disruption. C. Aggregate Exposure 1. Dietary exposure. The acute and chronic aggregate risk assessments for naphthalene acetates include exposure from food and drinking water onl y. Both acute and chronic aggregate risks are not of concern. 3 i. Food. Based on anal ys es of estimated dietary risks for the general U.S. population and various population subgroups, the acute and chronic dietary exposure estimates for naphthalene acetates are significantly below EPA’s level of concern for all supported commodities and not a risk of concern . 33 ii. Drinking water. Based on screening level computer models that provide high end estimates of pesticide concentrations for surface and ground water sources, all EDWCs are low and do not pose risks of concern. 3 2. Non - dietary exposure . Residential

– Estimated dermal and inhalation MOEs for the most highly exposed scenario of residential exposure to the naphthalene acetates are well above the target MOE of 100 and do not pose risks of concern. Occupational Handler

– The Agency

believes all naphthalene acetate handler risks are not of concern and all handler s will onl y be required to wear baseline PPE. Post - Application Exposure

– The MOEs for the two post - application exposure scenarios are well above the target MOE of 100 on the day

of application and, therefore, not of risk concern. 3 D. Cumulative Effects Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity , EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding for the naphthalene acetates. They do not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced b y other substances. Therefore, for the purpose of risk assessments, EPA has not assumed that the naphthalene acetates have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. 3 E. Safety Determination Acute and chronic risk estimates for all commodities are less than 100% of the aPAD (0.5 mg/kg/day) and cPAD (0.15 mg/kg/day) . 2 The % aPAD and % cPAD utilized by

the proposed tolerances are for small use minor crops and are not expected to add to the existing percentages. 1. U.S. population. 2% of the aPAD and 1% of the cPAD. 3 2. Infants and children . Infants

– 8% of the aPAD and 6% of the cPAD. Children

– 10% of the aPAD and 8% of the cPAD. 3 F. International Tolerances No maximum residue limits (MRL s) for NAA, its salts, ester, and acetamide have been established in the Codex Alimentarius , the food code established b y the UN’s World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization; therefore, issues of compatibility

between Codex MRL s and U.S. tolerances do not exist. Moreover, no Canadian or Mexican MRL s have been established for naphthalene acetates. 3
FOOTNOT ES: 1. 1 -Naphthaleneacetic Acid (NAA), its Salts, Ester, and Acetamide. Residue Chemistry Considerations for Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Case No. 0379. 2. Enclosed Petition Proposing Tolerances for NAA Use in Avocado, Mango, Mamey Sapote and Ramb utan 3 . Amended Reregistration Eligibility Decision. October 2007.4

4 . 1 -Naphthaleneacetic Acid

– Toxicology Disciplinary Chapter for the Reassessment Eligibility Decision (RED) (or Registration Support) Document (Revised). March 8, 2004