alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 19
- 00 40 4
- CV

__________________ MICHAEL W. DICKINSON , Appellant
V.
MONTGOMERY CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18
- 07
- 09 8 6 4
- CV

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 10, 2019, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellan t remitted the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant did not respond. Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and h as not shown
that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.2 There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, th e appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 15, 2020 Opinion Delivered January 16 , 2020
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
exv10w10



 





Exhibit — 10.10




SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

AGREE REALTY CORPORATION




 






Annual Cash Retainer:




     Non-Employee Director: $22,500



     Audit Committee Chair: $4,000 (in addition to non-employee retainer)



Other:




     Directors traveling from outside the Farmington Hills, Michigan area are reimbursed for all
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board or any
committees thereof.



     Directors who are employees or officers of the Company do not receive any compensation for
serving on the Board or any committees thereof.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 10, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00472

- CV

Howard Bart Freidman , Appellant

v.

Deborah Jenkins , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY CHI EF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on May 6, 2022

. Howard Bart

Frie dman has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the Court

agrees that the motion should be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismiss es

the appeal

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, bo th in this Court and in the

court below.
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 333-90521) pertaining to the Barneys New York, Inc. Stock Option Plan
for Non-employee Directors, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8, Nos.
333-45912 and 333-64488) pertaining to the Barneys New York, Inc. Employee Stock
Option Plan, of our report dated March 19, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of Barneys New York, Inc. and
subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
January 31, 2004.


                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
April 30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: List of restricted joint bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Minerals Management Service by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 
256.41, each entity within one of the following groups shall be 
restricted from bidding with any entity in any other of the following 
groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held 
during the bidding period May 1, 2009 through October 31, 2009. The 
List of Restricted Joint Bidders published in the Federal Register 
October 9, 2008, covered the period November 1, 2008 through April 30, 
2009.

Group I.
    Exxon Mobil Corporation.
    ExxonMobil Exploration Company.

Group II.
    Shell Oil Company.
    Shell Offshore Inc.
    SWEPI LP.
    Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.
    Shell Consolidated Energy Resources Inc.
    Shell Land & Energy Company.
    Shell Onshore Ventures Inc.
    Shell Offshore Properties and Capital II, Inc.
    Shell Rocky Mountain Production LLC.
    Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.

Group III.
    BP America Production Company.
    BP Exploration & Production Inc.
    BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

Group IV.
    TOTAL E&P USA, Inc.

Group V.
    Chevron Corporation.
    Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
    Chevron Midcontinent, LP.
    Unocal Corporation.
    Union Oil Company of California.
    Pure Partners, LP.

Group VI.
    ConocoPhillips Company.
    ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
    ConocoPhillips Petroleum Company.
    Phillips Pt. Arguello Production Company.
    Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP.
    Burlington Resources Offshore Inc.
    The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company.
    Inexeco Oil Company.

Group VII.
    Eni Petroleum Co. Inc.
    Eni Petroleum US LLC.
    Eni Oil US LLC.
    Eni Marketing Inc.
    Eni BB Petroleum Inc.
    Eni US Operating Co. Inc.
    Eni BB Pipeline LLC.

Group VIII.
    Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.
    Petrobras America Inc.

Group IX.
    StatoilHydro ASA.
    Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC.
    StatoilHydro USA E&P, Inc.
    StatoilHydro Gulf Properties Inc.

    Dated: March 29, 2009.
Walter D. Cruickshank,
Acting Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. E9-8943 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1217 CA 15-00698**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

LEE WILLIAMS, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK AND SUNY AT BUFFALO, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

DOLCE PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (PHILLIP URBAN OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.

GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, BUFFALO (DANIEL HUNTER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J.), entered July 18, 2014. The order denied the motion of claimant seeking leave to file a late claim.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at the Court of Claims. We write only to note that we reject claimant’s contention that merit alone should have warranted granting his motion for leave to file a late claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6). “Nothing in the statute makes the presence or absence of any one factor determinative” ( Bay Terrace Coop. Section IV v New York State Empls. Retirement Sys. Policemen’s & Firemen’s Retirement Sys. , 55 NY2d 979, 981) and, in any event, we agree with the court that claimant did not “adequately set forth sufficient facts demonstrating that his claim was meritorious” ( Olsen v State of New York , 45 AD3d 824, 824).

Entered: November 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00092-CV

WILLIAM WINDSOR,

Appellant

v.

JOEYISALITTLEKID, ET AL,

Appellees

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER

Appellant is incarcerated. This is one of four interlocutory appeals in which 

appellant is acting as his own counsel.1 He contends that due to his incarceration, he does 

not have adequate access to information and legal resources. He requests a stay in two 

of his appeals until he has adequate access to the information and legal resources needed 

to handle his appeals. By this order, we also address, on our own motion, the advisability 

 

1 See 10-14-00355-CV, Windsor v. Round; 10-14-00392-CV, Windsor v. Fleming; 10-15-00069-CV, Windsor v. 

McDougald.
Windsor v. Joeyisalittlekid, et al Page 2

of a stay in the other two pending appeals in addition to the two in which motions were 

filed.

Appellant does not contend he is indigent or that he cannot hire counsel to 

represent him in this appeal. 

A stay of this appeal is granted in part. Appellant cannot, however, use his own 

incarceration as a means to indefinitely delay the disposition of this proceeding. This 

appeal is stayed for 35 days. During this time, appellant may deal with his incarceration 

or hire counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. This appeal will be reinstated 

automatically after the expiration of 35 days and will proceed under the timetable 

required in the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and as scheduled by the Court, with 

or without retained counsel by appellant. After reinstatement, lack of access to the 

information and legal resources needed to handle his appeal will not be considered as 

grounds to further delay the timely disposition of this proceeding. Moreover, appellant’s 

incarceration cannot be used as an excuse to delay this appeal any longer.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Stay granted

Order issued and filed April 2, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2009-OS-0052]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Security Service, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Security Service proposes to delete a system of 
records notice from its existing inventory of records systems subject 
to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
May 22, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Defense Security Service, Office of FOIA/PA, 1340 Braddock 
Place, Alexandria, VA 22314-1651.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Les Blake at (703) 325-9450.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Security Service systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address above or via the agency Web site (http://www.dss.mil).
    The Defense Security Service proposes to delete a system of records 
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not 
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: April 16, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
 Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
V8-02

System name:
    Key Contractor Management Personnel Listing (August 17, 1999, 64 FR 
44704).

Reason:
    The information contained in this system of records has been 
incorporated into a new centralized Industrial Security Field Database 
(ISFD) retrieved by the name of the cleared contractor facility or 
``Cage Code'' associated with that facility, rather than by an 
individual's name or personal identifier. This system of records is 
being deleted.

[FR Doc. E9-9190 Filed 4-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of ALR Technologies Inc. (the “Company’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Sidney Chan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 29th day of March, 2011.








SIDNEY CHANSidney ChanChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3007 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,1,2-2-tetrafluoroethylene, oxidized, 

polymerized, reduced. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,1,2-2- 

tetrafluoroethylene, oxidized, polymerized, reduced. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,1,2-2-TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE, OXIDIZED, PO4 LYMERIZED, REDUCED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,1,2-2-Tetrafluoroethylene, 

oxidized, polymerized, reduced (CAS No. 69991–62– 

4) (provided for in subheading 3402.90.50) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3007 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Unassociated Document



 






Exhibit 4.8.26 - Electronic Catalogue (9) - Fire Protection & Smoke Control Centrifugal-Fan Box - Photo 001
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3123 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3123

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic staple fibers 
 containing at least 85 percent by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 
   percent or more but not more than 3 percent of water, not dyed or 
  pigmented (ecru), crimped, with an average decitex of 1.9 (plus or 
minus 10 percent) and fiber length of 51 mm (plus or minus 10 percent).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2012

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic staple fibers 
 containing at least 85 percent by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 
   percent or more but not more than 3 percent of water, not dyed or 
  pigmented (ecru), crimped, with an average decitex of 1.9 (plus or 
minus 10 percent) and fiber length of 51 mm (plus or minus 10 percent).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS CONTAINING AT LEAST 85 PERCENT BY 
              WEIGHT OF ACRYLONITRILE UNITS AND 2 PERCENT OR MORE BUT 
              NOT MORE THAN 3 PERCENT OF WATER, NOT DYED OR PIGMENTED 
              (ECRU), CRIMPED, WITH AN AVERAGE DECITEX OF 1.9 (PLUS OR 
              MINUS 10 PERCENT) AND FIBER LENGTH OF 51 MM (PLUS OR 
              MINUS 10 PERCENT).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.06 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to acrylic staple fibers 
containing at least 85 percent by weight of acrylonitrile units and 2 
percent or more but not more than 3 percent of water, not dyed or 
pigmented (ecru), crimped, with an average decitex of 1.9 (plus or 
minus 10 percent) and fiber length of 51 mm (plus or minus 10 percent)) 
is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE  OFFICER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LP  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of Hiland Partners, LP
(the "Company") and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph L. Griffin, Chief Executive Officer and President of Hiland
Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|                    |  |                                                                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2009 |  | /s/ JOSEPH L. GRIFFIN Joseph L. Griffin Chief Executive Officer and President

---



QuickLinks
exhibit10_1sep2011.htm


  
Exhibit 10.1







AMENDMENT TO THE


ENSCO INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED


1998 INCENTIVE PLAN







THIS AMENDMENT is effective the twenty-third day of August 2011, by Ensco plc, having its principal office in London, England (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”).







WITNESSETH:







WHEREAS, ENSCO International Incorporated adopted the ENSCO International Incorporated 1998 Incentive Plan, effective May 12, 1998 (which, as previously amended from time to time, is referred to herein as the “Plan”), and







WHEREAS, the Plan was assumed by the Company effective as of December 23, 2009;







WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company, upon recommendation of its Compensation Committee during its regular meeting held on 23 August 2011, has approved this Amendment to the Plan during a regular meeting held on 23 August 2011; and







WHEREAS, the Company now desires to adopt this Amendment to the Plan in order to (i) amend the definition of “Committee” in Section 2 of the Plan to reflect the bifurcation of the Nominating, Governance and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, (ii) amend the name of the Company, and (iii) delete Section 9(c) of the Plan;







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants herein contained, the Company hereby adopts the following Amendment to the Plan:


 


1. The definition of “Committee” in Section 2 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in the entirety to read as follows:


 


“Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Company or such other Committee or subcommittee as may be appointed by the Board of Directors from time to time.


 


2. The definition of “Company” in Section 2 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


“Company” shall mean Ensco plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, or any successor thereto.


 


3. Section 9(c) of the Plan is hereby deleted in the entirety and Section 9 of the Plan shall be renamed “CAPITALIZATION ADJUSTMENTS; MERGER”.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, has caused this Amendment to be executed effective as first above written.


 



	 	
 


ENSCO PLC


 


 


 


/s/ Brady K. Long________________________


By: Brady K. Long


Its: Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Annual Report of Cardero Resource Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael W. Kinley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 11, 2008



/s/ Michael W. Kinley

Michael W. Kinley
  Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60694

Conference Calendar

__________________

ALFA DAVIS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD ARMSTRONG,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95-CV-274-S-A

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfa Davis argues that the district court erred in

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint because there were not

adequate state post-deprivation remedies available to him.

We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district

court, and the brief, and find that the dismissal of the

complaint should be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated

by the district court, see Davis v. Armstrong, No. 4:95-CV-274-SA (N.D. Miss. Oct. 25, 1995), although on a different procedural 
No. 95-60694

-2-

basis. See Holloway v. Gunnell, 685 F.2d 150, 152 (5th Cir.

1982).

AFFIRMED.
|    |  |                        |  |  |  |                                       
|--- |  | ---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|    |  |                        |  |  |  |                                       
|    |  |                        | 
|E23 |  | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |  |  |  |                                       
|    |  | EXHIBIT 99.2           |  |  |  | SHELL ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F
2015



|            
|------------
|EXHIBIT 99.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-199736) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-126715, 333-141397, 333-171206, 333-192821 and 333-200953) of the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust
of our report dated March 9, 2016, relating to the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust Financial Statements, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP
|                                 
|PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP    
|Jersey, Channel Islands          
|March 9, 2016