alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3038 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain women’s 

footwear, not covering the ankle, designed to be worn in lieu of, but 

not over, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease, or 

chemicals or cold or inclement weather. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain women’s footwear, not covering the ankle, 

designed to be worn in lieu of, but not over, other footwear as a protection against water, oil, grease, or chemicals or cold or inclement weather. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3038 IS

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR, NOT COVERING 

2 THE ANKLE, DESIGNED TO BE WORN IN LIEU 

3 OF, BUT NOT OVER, OTHER FOOTWEAR AS A 

4 PROTECTION AGAINST WATER, OIL, GREASE, 

5 OR CHEMICALS OR COLD OR INCLEMENT 

6 WEATHER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.83 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 certain women’s footwear, not covering the ankle, designed 

10 to be worn in lieu of, but not over, other footwear as a 

11 protection against water, oil, grease, or chemicals or cold 

12 or inclement weather) is amended— 

13 (1) in the article description, by striking ‘‘$20/ 

14 pair’’ and inserting ‘‘$23/pair’’; and 

15 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

16 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

19 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32 - Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
             2002

In  connection  with the  filing  of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter  Ended  September  30, 2004,  (the  "Report") by  Interchange  Financial
Services  Corporation  ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Registrant.

                                           /s/ Anthony S. Abbate
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Anthony S. Abbate
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           /s/ Charles T. Field
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Charles T. Field
                                           Senior Vice President and CFO
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. REcEIvED 

In the Matter of Global Aircraft Interiors, Inc. JUN 2 3 2014 

2011EA110043 

JudgeNotAssigned HEARING DOCKET 

C:Jod- 03al} 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney 

listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully 

requested to be forwarded as follows: 

Zachary M. Berman 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3258 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By Zachary~nnan ~~ Attorney 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this 13th day, copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance 

was placed in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail Return Receipt 

Requested addressed as follows: 

Sande Lichtenstein, Esq. 

Lichtenstein & Schindel 

15 8 West Boston Post Road 

P.O. Box 787 

Mamaroneck, NY 10543 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and One Copy) 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

June 13 2014 

Dated ~d~ Li Hooks 

Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
---





Exhibit 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Companys Report of Dynamic Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim Coupland, Principal Executive and I, Ann-Marie Cederholm, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/ s / Tim Coupland                       
|Tim Coupland, Principal Executive Officer

March 12, 2008



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/ s / Ann-Marie Cederholm                       
|Ann-Marie Cederholm, Principal Financial Officer

March 12, 2008







---
Paul M. Hem, Jr. 

08 September 2015 

Dear Brenda: 

As per your letter dated, 26 August 2015, the following is submitted. 

● Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed-wing, 

rotorcraft,lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The 

description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). 

This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s). 

Aircraft: All sUAS are rotorcraft. 

 Auto return

 Home GPS

Make Model Type Max Wt (including payload) Max Flight Time Failsafe

3D Robotics X8 8 rotors 8.0 lbs. 15 minutes YES 

DJI Inspire 1 4 rotors 8.0 lbs. 10-20 minutes YES 

DJI Phantom 2 4 rotors 8.0 lbs. 10-20 minutes YES 

DJI Phantom 3 4 rotors 8.0 libs. 0-20 minutes YES 

Brenda, I trust that this will satisfy your request. 

Paul M. Hem, Jr.
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, AT EL PASO

No. 08-17-00160-CV

In the Matter of the Temporary Guardianship of the Person and Estate of Eduardo

Fuentes Varela, an Adult

(No. 2016-CGD00220 IN PROBATE COURT NO 1 OF EL PASO COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING $10.00

$10.00

$1,830.50

$0.00

$205.00 E-PAID

E-PAID

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

E-PAID ANDREA SIERRA

SOFIA HARDIN

BLANCO ORDONEZ MATA & WALLACE

N/A

SOFIA HARDIN

Balance of costs owing to the Eighth Court of Appeals, El Paso, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DENISE PACHECO

, CLERK OF THE EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and

correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH

DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and

styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Eighth District of Texas, this May 24, 2018.

Denise Pacheco, Clerk
Exhibit 99.6

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Peru Copper Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 40-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2006



/s/ Charles G. PrebleName: Charles G. PrebleTitle: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-61;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005
By:       /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName:  Ellen Z. LamaleTitle:    Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7680

MATTHEW P. MORRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, 

District Judge. (5:10-cv-00828)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew P. Morris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Matthew P. Morris appeals the district court’s order 

adopting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his action asserting claims pertaining to a 

detainer lodged against him by the state of Florida. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Morris v. United 

States, No. 5:10-cv-00828 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 17, 2013). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11296

Summary Calendar

FRANK DWIGHT CARTER,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:16-CV-187

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Frank Dwight Carter, former Texas prisoner # 561942, moves for leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal of the sua sponte dismissal of 

his case. The motion is a challenge to the district court’s certification that the 

appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th 

Cir. 1997).

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 17, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11296 Document: 00514198431 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2017
No. 16-11296

2

Carter fails to address the district court’s reasons for finding his case to 

be frivolous. Pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction. See Yohey v. 

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Nevertheless, when an appellant 

fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the 

appellant had not appealed the decision. Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy 

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Because Carter has failed to challenge any factual or legal aspect of the 

district court’s disposition of his claims or the certification that his appeal is 

not taken in good faith, he has abandoned the critical issue of his appeal. See 

id. Thus, the appeal lacks arguable merit. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 

220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP is 

DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d 

at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Carter is WARNED that filing further frivolous 

appeals will subject him to sanctions. See FED. R. APP. P. 38; Clark v. Green, 

814 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1987).

 Case: 16-11296 Document: 00514198431 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/17/2017
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globetech Environmental, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Theodor Hennig,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



By: /s/ Theodor Hennig
Theodor Hennig
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)
September 7, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
May 30, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

_______________



### m 03-50176 Summary Calendar

_______________



### C YNTHIA 

### R. W ILLIAMS 

### ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS



### M IR 

### , M ITCHELL AND 

### C OMPANY 

### ,
Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas


### m SA-01-CV-1097

_________________________

Before H IGGINBOTHAM , S MITH , and C LEMENT , Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM : * Cynthia Williams appe als, p ro se , a summary judgment denying her claim of retaliation under title VII. Her brief on appeal fails to set forth the facts and legal arguments, as the rules

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion sho uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

(continued...) (...continued) circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.2

require. Nonetheless, we treat t his as a pr o perly briefed case, and we affirm, essent ially for the reasons given by the magistrate judge in his Memorandum and Recommendat io n filed January 10, 2003, which was accepted and approved by the district court in entering summary judgment. The magist rate judge correctly opined that there was no showing of pretext in Williams’s termination, which was for good cause.

T he motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Report from Designated Federal Official, (3) Public Comment, (4) 2009 Meeting Schedule, (5) Report on Media Releases, (6) General Discussion, (7) Next Agenda. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on February 12, 2009 from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Pine Room, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Eduardo Olmedo, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Eduardo Olmedo, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. (530) 934-3316; E-Mail:                         *eolmedo@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting.  Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by February 9, 2009 will have the opportunity to address the Committee at those sessions. 

Dated: December 23, 2008. 

Eduardo Olmedo, 

Designated Federal Official. 

 [FR Doc. E9-86 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2431 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2431

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cis-3-hexen-1-ol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cis-3-hexen-1-ol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CIS-3-HEXEN-1-OL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.99 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to cis-3-hexen-1-ol) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TEDDY BERNARD DIXON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4223 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 30, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine Thomas, Judge. Teddy Bernard Dixon, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. SILBERMAN, SLEET and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.