alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to employment contract



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to the Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2003 (the
“Amendment”) is entered into on March 5th, 2008 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Bank of Internet USA, a federal savings bank (“Bank”), and Gary Lewis Evans (“Executive”). Bank and Executive are
sometimes collectively referred to in this Amendment as the “Parties.” 
 The Parties therefore agree as follows: 
 1. Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement currently in effect, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A (the “Employment Agreement”), is the
effective agreement between the Parties for the employment of Executive. 
 2. Superseding
Amendment. The terms of this Amendment dated March 5th, 2008 shall supersede all terms in the Amendment dated October 22, 2007.

 3. Contract Amendments: 
 a. Duties and
Title of Executive: Executive shall have the title of President of the Bank and shall have such duties as assigned by the Bank’s Board of Directors and as modified from time to time. During the Term, Executive shall perform exclusively for Bank
the services contemplated in this Agreement to be performed by Executive, faithfully, diligently and to the best of Executive’s ability, consistent with all applicable laws and regulations and the Bank’s federal stock charter and bylaws.
With prior written consent of Bank’s Board of Directors, Executive may serve on the Board of Directors of other financial institutions provided that in Bank’s Board of Director’s judgment, as reviewed in its sole discretion from time
to time, such service does not interfere with Executive’s duties to Bank. 
 b. Pre-Tax Net Income Benefit: No payments shall be made
pursuant to Section C.3, Exhibit A of Employment Agreement. 
 4. Additional Covenants: 
 a. Resignation: With thirty (30) days prior written notice provided to the Bank’s Chairman of the Board, Executive shall be entitled to resign
his employment with Bank and have this resignation treated comparably to a termination without cause pursuant to the Employment Agreement. 
  

	
	Executive:
	
	/S/ GARY LEWIS EVANS
	 Name: Gary Lewis Evans
 Date: March 5,
2008


  

	
	Bank: Bank of Internet USA
	
	/S/ JERRY F. ENGLERT
	 Name: Jerry F. Englert
 Chairman of the
Board
 Date: March 5, 2008
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 246/2005

of 11 February 2005         

concerning the 13th individual invitation to tender effected under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10(c) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 13th individual invitation to tender pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 8 February 2005, no award shall be made.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 February 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----
# L_2019105EN.01006801.xml

| 16.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 105/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 105/68

---

Note to the reader — L 102

Note to the reader — L 102 (see page 68)

| L 102 will not be published. |
| --- |

L 102 will not be published.

---
# Official Journal C 317A/12 D

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 317A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5112 December 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 317A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5112 December 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2008/C 317A/01 | Recruitment Notice PE/116/S — Director (Function group AD 14) — Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support — Directorate for Information Technologies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2008/C 317A/01

Recruitment Notice PE/116/S — Director (Function group AD 14) — Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support — Directorate for Information Technologies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 287 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 287

                  For the relief of Luay Lufti Hadad.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2011

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Luay Lufti Hadad.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LUAY LUFTI HADAD.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Luay Lufti 
Hadad shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Luay Lufti Hadad enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Luay 
Lufti Hadad shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully 
in the United States and shall be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the 
application for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees not 
later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 
admitted for permanent residence to Luay Lufti Hadad, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Luay Lufti Hadad under section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0029

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TERESA MOCKO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 5, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 30 2023

05/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0029
Facility Data

Facility Name - DEC ID

Metal Man Restoration

3-5508-00325

Address

245 East Third Street

Mount Vernon, NY 10550

Type of business Job Shop

# of Employees 5

Hours of Operation 4 - 5 hr/day not operating every day

Annual Revenue 1 million

Process Type trivalent electroplating

Tank Design and Operation

Dimensions 6' x 3' x 3' approx 300 gallons

Rectifier Capacity chrome 1000 amps

Annual Hours of Operation 260

Emisison Control Technology

Type of control/control device fume supressant

control device operating parameters 45 dynes/cm

Emission test data Complete test report

Exhaust design

Emission point 1 a 5000 CFM Wall Fan

Stack height (m) 0

Stack diameter (m) 0

Exit velocity (m/sec) 0

cubic meters per minute 5000

Exit temperature (K) ambient 

Other Available Supporting Documents

Emission Inventory Report 2009

Chromium release lbs/yr ?

Permit Application/Operating permit

State Facility Permit - online

http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/32249.html

Process flow diagrams/plant layout see attached

Notes facility not required to report emissions since under 10 tons/year

Tank Dimensions

Nickel plating tank

Chromium plating tank

Copper plating tank

Rinse tanks (there are nine tanks total) 

Rinse tank (9), Cimpound cleaner tanks (1), electroclean (1), acid etch (

Chrome 1000 Amps, Nickel 700 Amps, Copper 700 Amps.
ting every day

oclean (1), acid etch (1), Copper (1), nickel (1), Chrome(1).
Exhibit 23.1CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM       Weconsent to the incorporation by reference into the RegistrationStatement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-138752) ofArlington Tankers Ltd. and into the related Prospectus of our reportdated March 11, 2008, relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Arlington Tankers Ltd. as of andfor the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and relating to theeffectiveness of Arlington Tankers Ltd.’s internal control over financialreporting, which report is included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.           /s/    MOORESTEPHENS, P.C.           MOORE STEPHENS, P.C.      Certified Public Accounts      New York, New York      March 14, 2008
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.2

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement (this "AMENDMENT") is made and
entered into as of the 4th day of March 2008 (the "AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE DATE") by
and among Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. (the "COMPANY"), and
Michael Davies (the "EMPLOYEE"). The Company and Employee are sometimes referred
to herein individually as a "PARTY" and collectively as the "PARTIES."
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to them
in the Employment Agreement dated as of January 6, 2005 and entered into by the
Parties (the "AGREEMENT").

         WHEREAS, the Parties have previously orally amended the Agreement to
provide for Employee to not serve as the Company's Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, but rather as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
Secretary;

         WHEREAS, Employee is currently serving as the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Secretary; and

         WHEREAS, the Parties wish to memorialize their oral amendment to the
Agreement by entering into this Amendment;

         THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

I.       AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT

         The Parties that the Agreement is amended to delete the references to
"Executive Vice President" and "Chief Financial Officer," and to insert in the
place of these terms, "Chief Executive Officer" and "Secretary," respectively.

II.      GENERAL PROVISIONS

         A. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Parties agree
that all other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged and that the
Agreement remain in full force and effect.

         B. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.

         C. The Agreement, as hereby amended, sets forth the entire agreement
and understanding of the Parties hereto with respect to the transactions
contemplated hereby, and supersedes all prior agreements, arrangements and
understandings related to the subject matter hereof. No understanding, promise,
inducement, statement of intention, representation, warranty, covenant or
condition, written or oral, express or implied, whether by statute or otherwise,
has been made by any party hereto which is not embodied in this Agreement, as
hereby amended, and no party hereto shall be bound by or liable for any alleged
understanding, promise, inducement, statement, representation, warranty,
covenant or condition not so set forth.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, as
of the date first written hereinabove.


THE COMPANY:

RECLAMATION CONSULTING AND APPLICATIONS, INC.


      By: /s/ Gordon W. Davies
         --------------------
         Gordon W. Davies
         President


EMPLOYEE:


         /s/ Michael C. Davies
         ---------------------
         Michael C. Davies
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2755 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2755

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,3',4,4'-
                  biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,3',4,4'-
                  biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,3',4,4'-BIPHENYLTETRACARBOXYLIC DIANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.11 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3,3',4,4'-
biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride) is amended by striking the date in 
the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Lalit Dhadphale, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




May 23, 2011
/s/ Lalit DhadphaleLalit DhadphalePresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. and will be retained by HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
attestationh1903.htm


Back to Form 8-K




Medicare Advantage Attestation of Benefit Plan


 


WELLCARE OF LOUISIANA, INC.


 


H1903







I attest that I have examined the Plan Benefit Packages (PBPs) identified below and that the benefits identified in the PBPs are those that the above-stated organization will make available to eligible beneficiaries in the approved service area during program year 2012. I further attest that we have reviewed the bid pricing tools (BPTs) with the certifying actuary and have determined them to be consistent with the PBPs being attested to here.









I further attest that these benefits will be offered in accordance with all applicable Medicare program authorizing statutes and regulations and program guidance that CMS has issued to date and will issue during the remainder of 2011 and 2012, including but not limited to, the 2012 Call Letter, the 2012 Solicitations for New Contract Applicants, the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual, the Medicare Managed Care Manual, and the CMS memoranda issued through the Health Plan Management System (HPMS).







	
Plan 


ID

	
Segment


ID

	
Version

	
Plan Name

	
Plan 


Type

	
Transaction 


Type

	
MA 


Premium

	
Part D 


Premium

	
CMS Approval 


Date

	
Effective 


Date


	
011

	
0

	
7

	
WellCare Access (HMO SNP)

	
HMO 

	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
35.00

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12


	
022

	
0

	
7

	
WellCare Value (HMO- 


POS)

	HMOPOS	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
0.00

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12


	
024

	
0

	
8

	
 WellCare Dividend 


(HMO-POS)

	
HMOPOS

	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
0.00

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12







 


 


 


 


 



	 	 	 	 H1903



                                                                         


 




  





  











  












	
THOMAS TRAN


 

	 	 9/1/2011 10:48:50 AM	 
	
 


Contracting Official Name 

	 	 Date	 





 


 


 


 




	
WELLCARE OF LOUISIANA, INC.


 

	 	
8735 Henderson Rd


Ren 1 


Tampa, FL 33634


 

	 
	
 


Organization 

	 	
 


Address

	 





                    


 


 


 


 


                                                         


	 	 	 	 H1903
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 297 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 297

To amend section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that 
  funds received as universal service contributions and the universal 
 service support programs established pursuant to that section are not 
subject to certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly 
                    known as the Antideficiency Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2011

 Mr. Rockefeller (for himself and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that 
  funds received as universal service contributions and the universal 
 service support programs established pursuant to that section are not 
subject to certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly 
                    known as the Antideficiency Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDING.

    Congress finds that in order to ensure the efficient and effective 
implementation of the Universal Service Fund on a long-term basis, the 
Universal Service Fund needs to be exempt from the Antideficiency Act.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934.

    Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) Application of Antideficiency Act.--Section 1341 and 
subchapter II of chapter 15 of title 31, United States Code, do not 
apply--
            ``(1) to any amount collected or received as Federal 
        universal service contributions required by this section, 
        including any interest earned on such contributions; nor
            ``(2) to the expenditure or obligation of amounts 
        attributable to such contributions for universal service 
        support programs established pursuant to this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 27, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30544

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JILMAR OVANDO-CANDELO, also known as Jilmar Candelo,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CR-137-2-C

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jilmar Ovando-Candelo appeals his sentence following his 

guilty plea of conspiring to possess with the intent to

distribute approximately five kilograms of heroin. OvandoCandelo argues that the district court should not have held him

accountable for the heroin that was found on a vessel because the

district court should have taken into consideration the lack of

evidence to show that he was aware of the heroin on the vessel. 
No. 03-30544

-2-

The factual basis for Ovando-Candelo’s guilty plea stated

that, if called, one of Ovando-Candelo’s co-conspirators, who,

with Ovando-Candelo, was present when the heroin changed hands,

would have testified that the seized quantity of heroin was

delivered as a show of good faith, that more drugs remained on

the vessel, and that, at the co-conspirator’s direction, agents

found approximately 3.2 additional kilograms of heroin on the

vessel. Because the offense level is determined by the quantity

of drugs involved in the offense, Ovando-Candelo has not shown

that the district court clearly erred in including the heroin

found on the vessel in the offense conduct. See United States v.

Schorovsky, 202 F.3d 727, 729 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v.

Alford, 142 F.3d 825, 831 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Ovando-Candelo also argues that the district court clearly

erred in denying a downward adjustment for his being a minor

participant because he had a limited role in the offense, was not

aware of the total amount of drugs, and was not the purchaser of

the drugs. The district court’s refusal to grant Ovando-Candelo

a two level reduction for being a minor participant was not

clearly erroneous. See United States v. Virgen-Moreno, 265 F.3d

276, 296 (5th Cir. 2001). The large quantity of heroin that

Ovando-Candelo was transporting strongly supports the denial of a

reduction for being a minor participant. See United States v.

Rojas, 868 F.2d 1409, 1409-10 (5th Cir. 1989). Furthermore, the

district court was not required to accept Ovando-Candelo’s
No. 03-30544

-3-

account of his role in the drug trafficking scheme. See United

States v. Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 138 (5th Cir. 1989). The

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.