alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jinglin Shi, the Chief Executive Officer of
CHINA NUTRIFRUIT GROUP LIMITED (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.     The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 8th day of February, 2010.

/s/ Jinglin
Shi Jinglin Shi Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Nutrifruit Group Limited and will be retained by
China Nutrifruit Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Health Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul H. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
June 1, 2015 

Mr. Andrew O’Fee 

8126 Meadow Glen Drive 

Germantown, TN 38138 

Dear Mr. O’Fee: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 30, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1355), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended May 31, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                  6,799
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              44
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        6,843
<PP&E>                                  8,700
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         15,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     159
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             15,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           15,544
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        4,584
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         4,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     4,157
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            4,157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            4.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                            4.59
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2****CENTERPLATE, INC.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Centerplate, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ending January 2, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin F. McNamara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/                 Kevin F. McNamara      Kevin F. McNamara,Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer   Date: March 19, 2007
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

___________________________

No. 12-12829

Non-Argument Calendar

__________________________

D. C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-00473-WSD 

UNIQUE SPORTS PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FERRARI IMPORTING COMPANY, 

d.b.a. Gamma Sports, 

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia 

__________________________

(January 30, 2013)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-12829 Date Filed: 01/30/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Unique Sports Products, Inc. appeals the judgment the District Court entered 

in accordance with its May 15, 2012 order granting Ferrari Importing Company’s,

d/b/a Gamma Sports, motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief. 

The District Court dismissed with prejudice Unique’s claim that Gamma’s use of its 

String Survey rankings constituted false and misleading representations of fact in its 

commercial advertising and promotions in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham 

Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and dismissed without prejudice Unique’s claim under 

Georgia’s Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. 

The District Court dismissed Unique’s Lanham Act claim on the basis of our 

decision in Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. McDonald’s Corp., 489 F.3d 1156 (11th Cir. 

2007), concluding that McDonald’s controlled its disposition of that claim. We 

agree and therefore affirm the District Court’s judgment. 

AFFFIRMED.

Case: 12-12829 Date Filed: 01/30/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
     Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, DaimlerChrysler Debenture-Backed
     Series 2004-8 Trust (the "Trust");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in this annual report, taken as a
     whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
     to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the pooling and
     servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in this annual report is
     included in this report;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Depositor
     and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
     based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under
     that agreement, and except as disclosed in this annual report, the
     Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that
     agreement; and

5.   This annual report discloses all significant deficiencies relating to the
     compliance by the Trustee and the Depositor with the minimum servicing or
     similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
     accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform
     Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
     set forth in the pooling and servicing or similar agreement that is
     included in this annual report.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2006


/s/ CHARLES M. WEAVER
----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135396 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135396 

 COA: 271635 

Genesee CC: 05-017370-FC 

JAQUAVIS LURAY TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50044

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDY THOMAS SCHUMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-03-CR-99-2

--------------------

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andy Thomas Schuman appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting the distribution of

cocaine. He argues that the district court abused its discretion

by admitting two audio tapes into evidence at trial.

Prior to their admission, the tapes were authenticated by

Special Agent Emrich. His testimony established the fidelity of

the recording equipment and the absence of material alterations. 

Additionally, he identified one of the speakers as the
No. 04-50044

-2-

confidential informant who was making the recording. Based on

Emrich’s testimony, the tapes were sufficiently authenticated

prior to admission. See United States v. Lance, 853 F.2d 1177,

1181-82 (5th Cir. 1988). Nevertheless, even assuming that the

district court abused its discretion in admitting the tapes on

the basis of Emrich’s testimony alone, Schuman cannot show that

his substantial rights were affected. See United States v.

Asibor, 109 F.3d 1023, 1032 (5th Cir. 1997). The tapes were not

played until the confidential informant, who was a party to the

conversations, testified. The informant’s testimony confirmed

the accuracy of the recordings and the identification of the

parties. Schuman has also failed to establish that the quality

of the recordings was so poor as to render them untrustworthy. 

See United States v. White, 219 F.3d 442, 448-49 (5th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 (a)
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Christopher R. Smith, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of COMC, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


         c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


         a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 27, 2002


                            /s/ Christopher R. Smith
                            ------------------------
                            Name: Christopher R. Smith
                            President, Chief Executive Officer and
                            Acting Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2778 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2778

  To suspend temporarily the duty on reaction product of 3,5-dimethyl-
       1,2-diazole with polymer of hexane-1,6-diyl diisocyanate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on reaction product of 3,5-dimethyl-
       1,2-diazole with polymer of hexane-1,6-diyl diisocyanate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTION PRODUCT OF 3,5-DIMETHYL-1,2-DIAZOLE WITH POLYMER OF 
              HEXANE-1,6-DIYL DIISOCYANATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Reaction product    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        of 3,5-dimethyl-                                                   31/2015.......
                        1,2-diazole with
                        polymer of hexane-
                        1,6-diyl
                        diisocyanate (CAS
                        No. 163206-31-3)
                        in organic
                        solvent (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3911.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Statement of
ComplianceProtective Life Secured Trust 2004-45 (the "Trust")

I, Millie
Cicero, a duly elected and acting officer of The Bank of New York ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on
behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

1.     I
have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the
collection and distribution of trust money pursuant to
Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture
pursuant to which the Trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2004 (the "Relevant
Year"); and

2.     Based
upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated March 30, 2005, prepared by the Trust's
independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 10 of the Expense and Indemnity
Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to noteholders
pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the
Indenture was performed in a satisfactory manner in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Indenture Trustee

|By: |  | /s/MILLIE CICERO
      Name:  Millie
      CiceroTitle:    Assistant Treasurer |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Date:  March 30, 2005
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Medizone International, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Edwin G. Marshall, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edwin G. Marshall Edwin G. Marshall, Principal Executive Officer  Date: July 3, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-61 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName: Nancy H. Forte
Title: Assistant Vice President
 Date: March 29, 2005