alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION





I,
Jacqueline Danforth, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Visolar, Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.           I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:





a.
            designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;





b.
            evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the "Evaluation
      Date"); and





c.
            presented
      in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
      Evaluation Date;





5.           I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):





a.
            all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and





b.
            any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the
      registrant's  internal control;
and





6.           I
have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
change in internal controls or I other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.




Date:  February
12, 2009





/s/ Jacqueline
Danforth


Jacqueline
Danforth


Principal
Financial Officer, and


Director
EXHIBIT 10.6

 

[Insert Company letterhead.]

 

October 14, 2011

 

Subject:                                                     Side Letter Agreement to the Compensation Agreement between Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) and Joel R. Pitlor (the “Consultant”), dated December 3, 2010

 

Dear Mr. Pitlor,

 

This Side Letter Agreement entered into on October 14, 2011 between the Company and the Consultant will serve to modify the Compensation Agreement entered into on December 3, 2010 (the “Compensation Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein which are not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as those given to them in the Compensation Agreement.

 

WHEREAS, the Company agreed to issue the Shares within six months of the date of the Compensation Agreement and the deadline has subsequently passed;

 

WHEREAS, the Company plans to register a Registration Statement on Form S-8 prior to November 12, 2011;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and undertakings set forth herein, and intending to be fully bound hereby, the parties agree to modify the Compensation Agreement in the following respects:

 

1.               Section 2 shall be replaced with the following language:

 

The Shares will be issued as registered common stock from the “2011 Deferred Compensation Plan” within 5 business days following the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

2.               The vesting schedule of the Shares as described in Section 3 shall remain unmodified.

 

Except as specifically set forth in this Side Letter Agreement, all other terms, rights or provisions of the Compensation Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.

 

 

	
AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
CONSULTANT
    	
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Joel R. Pitlor
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Jack Dreimiller
    
	
Name:
    	
Joel R. Pitlor
    	
Name:
    	
Jack Dreimiller
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 13.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Exeter Resource Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Wendell Zerb, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date: April 29, 2016                                                              /s/ Wendell Zerb___________________


Wendell Zerb, Principal Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from S.E.C. Form
10-Q for the  quarterly  period  ended  January 28, 1996 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 JUL-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                                    JUL-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                      JAN-28-1996
<CASH>                                                                    816
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          23,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           (1,091)
<INVENTORY>                                                            19,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       51,029
<PP&E>                                                                 72,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        (21,870)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        111,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  60,714
<BONDS>                                                                32,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                                  539
<OTHER-SE>                                                             12,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          111,751
<SALES>                                                                79,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       79,915
<CGS>                                                                  78,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          85,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      2,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        (8,192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           (2,021)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    (6,171)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           (6,171)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (1.14)
        

</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2784 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,2,3-propanetriol, polymer 

with 2,4-diisocyanato-1-methylbenzene, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol, methyloxirane and oxirane. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,2,3- 

propanetriol, polymer with 2,4-diisocyanato-1- 

methylbenzene, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol, methyloxirane and oxirane. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,2,3-PROPANETRIOL, POLYMER WITH 2,4- 

4 DIISOCYANATO-1-METHYLBENZENE, 2-ETHYL5 2-(HYDROXYMETHYL)-1,3-PROPANEDIOL, 

6 METHYLOXIRANE AND OXIRANE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.80 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2784 IS

1 1,2,3-propanetriol, polymer with 2,4-diisocyanato-1- 

2 methylbenzene, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

3 propanediol, methyloxirane and oxirane) is amended by 

4 striking the date in the effective period column and insert5 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

8 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2968 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2968

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Frescolat ML.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Frescolat ML.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRESCOLAT ML.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 5-Methyl-2-
(methylethyl)cyclohexhyl-2-hydroxypropanoate (Lactic acid, menthyl 
ester) (Fescolat)) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Jennifer Lee HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2261

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2741 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2741

          To suspend temporarily the duty on gadolinium oxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on gadolinium oxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GADOLINIUM OXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Gadolinium oxide    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 12064-62-                                                12/31/2015
                          9) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2846.90.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2861 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2′-(2-methylpropylidene) bis(4,6- 

dimethylphenol). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2′-(2- 

methylpropylidene) bis(4,6-dimethylphenol). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,2′-(2-METHYLPROPYLIDENE) BIS(4,6- 

4 DIMETHYLPHENOL). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,2′-(2-Methylpropylidene) 

bis(4,6-dimethylphenol) (CAS 

No. 33145–10–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

2907.29.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2861 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Annual Report of PDC 2004-B Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Richard W. McCullough

July 31, 2009Richard W. McCulloughPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

July 31, 2009Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

T.A., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Case Nos. 2D17-2258

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 23, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Barbara TwineThomas, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

SLEET, Judge.

T.A. challenges the trial court's juvenile disposition order in which the court 

found him guilty of committing the delinquent act of burglary of an occupied dwelling, 

withheld adjudication, and placed him on probation. However, neither the disposition 

order nor the court's oral pronouncement specifies the length of the probationary term 

imposed. 
- 2 -

Because adjudication was withheld, the trial court could impose probation 

for an indefinite period not to exceed T.A.'s nineteenth birthday. See R.F. v. State, 42 

So. 3d 333, 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). But "[i]t is not clear from the record whether the 

trial court intended to place [T.A.] on an indefinite period of probation or whether it was 

an oversight that the length of probation was not specified." See K.A. v. State, 152 So. 

3d 117, 118 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). We therefore reverse the disposition order to the 

extent that it failed to set the length of T.A.'s probation and remand for a determination 

of the duration of probation. See id. We affirm the disposition order in all other 

respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1280

ARLENE J. HOFFMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES E. OESTERREICHER, President of J.C.

Penney Company, Incorporated; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; J.C. PENNEY COMPANY,

INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-01-1532-A)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arlene J. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Celeste deLorge Flippen, J.C.

PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plano, Texas; Claude David Convisser,

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arlene J. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Hoffman v. Oesterreicher, No. CA-01-1532-A (E.D. Va.

filed Feb. 7, 2002 & entered Feb. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
v237484_ex10-2 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
Statement Pursuant to
Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
undersigned, Sherry L. Couturier, CFO of International American Technologies,
Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following certification as required
by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the
following of this annual report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report of Form 10-KSB/A for the year
ended December 31, 2005.






The
undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above annual report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of International American Technologies, Inc.
and results of its operations.






Date:
March 18, 2008


Sherry L.
Couturier


CFO/s/ Sherry L.
Couturier
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6179

CLAYTON JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA AND ITS AGENTS, individually and officially,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (3:20-cv-02132-TMC)

Submitted: February 25, 2022 Decided: March 7, 2022

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton Jones, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6179 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/07/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Clayton Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.*

 The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be 

denied and advised Jones that failure to file timely, specific objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 

F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see 

also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Although Jones received proper notice 

and filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived 

appellate review of the district court’s determination that his complaint should be dismissed 

pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), because the objections were not specific 

to the particularized legal recommendations made by the magistrate judge on the issues

that he now seeks to challenge on appeal. See Martin, 858 F.3d at 245 (holding that, “to 

preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party must object to the finding 

* Although the district court dismissed the action without prejudice, mere 

amendment cannot cure the deficiencies identified by the district court, and we thus have 

jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 610 (4th Cir. 

2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6179 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/07/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as reasonably to alert the 

district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation marks omitted)). As 

to the remaining issues that Jones raises on appeal, we have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6179 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/07/2022 Pg: 3 of 3