alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.14

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.14

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the periodic report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31,  2003  (the  "Report")  of  Larchdale  Ownership  Company,  Ltd.  (the
"Company")  I, L. Mark  Hammerschmitt,  President,  LMH Realty,  Inc.,  Managing
General Partner of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant  to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  April 25, 2003

                                        By:/s/L. Mark Hammerschmitt
                                        -----------------------------
                                        L. Mark Hammerschmitt, President
                                        LMH REALTY, INC.
                                        GENERAL PARTNER


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Derek Resources Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward G. Byrd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 1, 2006



DEREK OIL & GAS CORPORATION





/s/ Edward G. Byrd

_______________________
Edward G. Byrd

Chief Financial Officer and Director
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document











 



 
 

Exhibit 10.47    
    


         

  


February 22,
2008 


Timothy
M. Yager

c/o iPCS, Inc.

1901 N. Roselle Road

Schaumburg, IL 60195 


Dear
Mr. Yager: 


        Reference
is made to the Employment Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2007 (the "Employment Agreement"), between you and iPCS Wireless, Inc. Capitalized terms used herein but
not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement. 


        I
am pleased to inform you that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors took the following actions effective January 1, 2008: 



	•
	Increased
your Annual Base Salary to $495,000.



	•
	Increased
your Incentive Bonus under the Incentive Bonus Plan at the target level of performance to 100% of the Annual Base Salary. 




        This
constitutes an amendment of your Employment Agreement. Please acknowledge this amendment by countersigning below. 



	

 	

 	

Very truly yours,
	

 	

 	
iPCS, Inc.
	

 	

 	

By:	

/s/ Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.

	 	 	Name:  Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
	 	 	Title:    Vice President and General Counsel
	

AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED

this 22nd day of February, 2008	

 	

 
	

By:	

/s/ Timothy M. Yager
	

 	

 













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.47
James Douglas NOLAN and Regina Lequerica, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Randolph STARKS, Appellee(s)/respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JULY 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 10.1


 


ToughBuilt Industries, Inc.


25371 Commercentre Drive, Suite 200


Lake Forest, California 92630


 


	
			 

				
			February 18, 2022

			


















 


[PURCHASER]


 


Re:     Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2022 (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among ToughBuilt Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) and the purchasers signatory thereto (each, a “Purchaser”)


 


In connection with the Purchase Agreement and the Transaction Documents, the Company and the undersigned Purchaser agree that the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended to insert a new Section 4.10(d) in the Purchase Agreement as follows:


 


“(d)    Each Purchaser agrees that such Purchaser’s voting rights pursuant to Section 4 of the Series F Certificate of Designation shall be limited to a number of Conversion Shares underlying the Series F Preferred Stock determined by using a conversion price of $0.2501.  For purposes of clarity, the conversion price of $0.2501 shall apply only for purposes of Section 4 of the Series F Certificate of Designation and not apply to any other section of the Series F Certificate of Designation or any Transaction Document.”


 


Terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Purchase Agreement.  This letter agreement may be executed in two counterparts, which when taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement.


 


	
			 

				
			ToughBuilt Industries, Inc.

			
	
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By:

				
			                                

			
	
			 

				
			Name: Michael Panosian

			
	
			 

				
			Title: Chief Executive Officer

			


















 


Acknowledged and agreed as of the date hereof:






[purchaser name]


 


	
			By: 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			Name:

				
			 

			
	
			Title:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: December 10, 2009
    /s/ Robert E. DoseRobert E. DoseVice President of Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)
|   | (1)  the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:        | May 12, 2009 |   | By:          | /s/ Norman E. Corn |
|--------------|------------------------|--------|--------------|-----------------------------------|
|    |              |   |    | Norman E. Corn          |
|    |              |   |    | Chief Executive Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 333-90521) pertaining to the Barneys New York, Inc. Stock Option Plan
for Nonemployee Directors, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8, Nos.
333-45912 and 333-64488) pertaining to the Barneys New York, Inc. Employee Stock
Option Plan, of our report dated April 5, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Barneys New York, Inc. and subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 2, 2002.



                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP





New York, New York
May 1, 2002
---

Exhibit 4.15

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTdated for reference the 1st day of August, 2010 (the Amendment). BETWEEN:HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP.(the Company)AND:JOHN DOCHERTY(the Executive)
  WHEREAS:A.
     the parties entered into an employment agreement dated for reference August 6, 2008, which was amended October 1st, 2009 (as so amended, the Employment Agreement);B.
     the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement upon the terms set out in this Amendment;THEREFOREin consideration of the recitals, the following covenants and the payment of one dollar made by each party to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by each party, the parties agree on the following terms:1.
     The amendments set out in this Amendment are effective on and after August 1, 2010.2.
     All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except that where this Amendment may be in conflict with the provisions of the Employment Agreement, then this Amendment shall govern.3.
     Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:3.1 **Annual Base Salary**The Company shall pay or provide to the Executive, for his services under this Agreement, an annual salary of $300,000, payable semi-monthly on the fifteenth and the second last banking day of the month. Should the fifteenth day of any month not be a business day, the base salary otherwise due on such date shall be paid to the Executive on the immediately preceding business day.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.
  HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. Per:/s/ Donald H. Segal
Authorized Signatory /s/ John DochertyJOHN DOCHERTY


---
Tanzolia L. SALLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Roubik Gregorian, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.



Date: November 7, 2005



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ROUBIK GREGORIAN                            
|Roubik Gregorian                                
|Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO 18 U. S. C.  SECTION  1350,  AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of TM Century, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the  quarter  ending  December  31,  2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, R. David  Graupner,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as enacted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:
     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

/s/  R. David Graupner
----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
February 12, 2003
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 21, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00 35 4

- CV

Paul Johnson , Appellant

v.

Bastrop Central Appraisal District , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES B AKER , TRIANA, AND SMITH

REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order declaring appellant a vexatious lit igan t signed by the tr i a l court

on May 17, 2023 . Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that

there was reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial cou rt’s order

declaring appellant a vexatiou s li tigant and requiring him to furnish security and remands the

case to the trial court for further proceedings. A ppell ee shall pay all c osts relating to this appeal,

both in this Court and in the cou rt b elow.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 21, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00 40 4

- CV

Paul Johnson , Appellant

v.

Bastrop Central Appraisal District , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES B AKER , TRIANA, AND SMITH

REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order dismissing with prejudi ce appellant ’ s lawsuit signed by the tr i a l

court on June 21 , 2023 . Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds

that there was reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial cou rt’s order

dismissing appellant ’ s lawsu it for failure to furnish s ecurity and remands the case to the trial

court for further proceedings. A ppell ee shall pay all c osts relating to this appeal, both in this

Court and in the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Financial Data Schedule for Olympus Communications L.P. for the six
months ended June 30, 1997.  Information is only included for Olympus
Communications(a registrant) and does not include information for Olympus
Capital Corp., which has no operations.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000861255
<NAME> OLYMPUS COMMUNICATIONS LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,818<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         233,693<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 634,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        576,406
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (90,881)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   634,686
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (125)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,931)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are net of Allowance
<F2>PP&E is net of Depreciation
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00435

- CV

Henry M. Porter, Jr. and James

Harold Porter

v.

Wise County, Texas §

§

§

§ From the 271st District Court

of Wise County (07

- 07

- 565 )

February 20 , 2014

Per Curiam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3056 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3056

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leathered footwear for men.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2012

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leathered footwear for men.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHERED FOOTWEAR FOR MEN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Footwear for men    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        with uppers of                                                     31/2015.......
                        leather other
                        than of pigskin
                        (other than work
                        footwear, tennis
                        shoes, basketball
                        shoes, gym shoes,
                        training shoes
                        and the like, and
                        other than slip-
                        on footwear),
                        covering the
                        ankle, valued $27/
                        pair or higher,
                        designed to be
                        worn in lieu of,
                        but not over,
                        other footwear as
                        a protection
                        against water,
                        oil, grease or
                        chemicals or cold
                        or inclement
                        weather where
                        such protection
                        includes
                        protection
                        against water
                        that is imparted
                        by the use of a
                        coated or
                        laminated textile
                        fabric (provided
                        for in subheading
                        6403.91.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 13

- 00344

- CR IN RE K evin Lamar JOHNSON Original Mandamus Proceedings 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 19, 2013
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED AS MOOT
O n May 31, 2013, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he asserts he has filed various motions requesting DNA/Latent Fingerprint Testing pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 64.01, a motion for summary judgment, and a motion f or appointment of counsel on June 16, 2010, January 19, 2011, and May 12, 2011. Relator asserts he wrote to the trial court on May 2, 2011, June 17, 2011, May 14, 2012, September 28, 2012, and January 24, 2013, asking about the status of his motions, but he has received no response. Relator asks this court to compel the district clerk to provide him with notice of receipt of his motions and compel the trial court to rule on his motions. W e have no mandamus jurisdiction over a district clerk unless the is suance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Coronado , 980 S.W.2d

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2002CR4779, styled State of Texas v. Kevin Lamar Johnson , pending in the 227th Judicial Distri ct Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr. presiding.04

- 13

- 00344

- CR
691, 692 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Relator has not establish ed that the writ he is requesting is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Therefo re, we DENY relator’s request that we issue a writ of mandamus against the district clerk.
H owever, this court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district” and other writs a s necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 22.221(a)

- (b) ( West 2004). On June 6, 2013, respondent filed a response to relator’s petition, stating that the trial court has now appointed relator an attorney to represent r elator in connection with his motions for post

- conviction DNA testing. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

- 2

-