15360 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

and outboard front spar pitch load fittings, 

and do all applicable corrective actions, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–57A0117, dated October 1, 2009, except 

as required by paragraph (i) of this AD. Do 

all applicable corrective actions before 

further flight. 

Repetitive Inspections 

(h) At the applicable time specified in 

paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–57A0117, dated October 

1, 2009, repeat the applicable inspection 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–57A0117, dated October 1, 2009. 

Exceptions to the Service Bulletin 

(i) If any cracking is found during any 

inspection required by this AD, and Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 767–57A0117, dated 

October 1, 2009, specifies to contact Boeing 

for appropriate action: Before further flight, 

repair the cracking using a method approved 

in accordance with the procedures specified 

in paragraph (k) of this AD. 

(j) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–57A0117, dated October 1, 2009, 

specifies a compliance time after the date on 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–57A0117, 

dated October 1, 2009, this AD requires 

compliance within the specified compliance 

time after the effective date of this AD. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Berhane Alazar, 

Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM– 

120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification 

Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 

Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 917–6577; fax (425) 917–6590. Or, email information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACOAMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) To request a different method of 

compliance or a different compliance time 

for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 

39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on 

any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD, if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization that has been 

authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to 

make those findings. For a repair method to 

be approved, the repair must meet the 

certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 

19, 2010. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–6851 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–1152; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–ASW–31] 

Proposed Amendment of Class E 

Airspace; Austin, TX 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

amend Class E airspace in the Austin, 

TX area. Additional controlled airspace 

is necessary to accommodate new 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures (SIAPs) at Austin Executive 

Airport, Austin, TX. The FAA is taking 

this action to enhance the safety and 

management of Instrument Flight Rules 

(IFR) operations at the airport. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 13, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must 

identify the docket number FAA–2009– 

1152/Airspace Docket No. 09–ASW–31, 

at the beginning of your comments. You 

may also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The 

Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647– 

5527), is on the ground floor of the 

building at the above address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Enander, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–321– 

7716. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2009–1152/Airspace 

Docket No. 09–ASW–31.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http:// 

www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/ 

air_traffic/publications/ 

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. An informal docket 

may also be examined during normal 

business hours at the office of the 

Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham 

Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking 

202–267–9677, to request a copy of 

Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking Distribution 

System, which describes the application 

procedure. 

The Proposal 

This action proposes to amend Title 

14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR), Part 71 by adding additional Class 

E airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface in the Austin, TX 

airspace area, establishing controlled 

airspace for SIAPs at Austin Executive 

Airport, Austin, TX. The addition of the 

RNAV (GPS) RWY 13 and RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 31 SIAPs at Austin Executive 

Airport has created the need to extend 

Class E airspace to the northwest, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 59 / Monday, March 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules 15361 

northeast and southeast of the current 

airspace. Controlled airspace is needed 

for the safety and management of IFR 

operations at the airport. 

Class E airspace areas are published 

in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 

7400.9T, dated August 27, 2009, and 

effective September 15, 2009, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designation 

listed in this document would be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) Is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this rule, 

when promulgated, will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

section 106 describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart 

I, section 40103. Under that section, the 

FAA is charged with prescribing 

regulations to assign the use of airspace 

necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft 

and the efficient use of airspace. This 

regulation is within the scope of that 

authority as it would add additional 

controlled airspace in the Austin, TX 

area. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9T, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, signed August 27, 2009, and 

effective September 15, 2009, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

ASW TX E5 Austin, TX [Amended] 

Point of Origin 

(Lat. 30°17′55′′ N., long. 97°42′06′′ W.) 

Austin, Lakeway Airpark, TX 

(Lat. 30°21′27′′ N., long. 97°59′40′′ W.) 

Austin, Austin Executive Airport, TX 

(Lat. 30°23′51′′ N., long. 97°33′59′′ W.) 

Lago Vista, Lago Vista-Rusty Allen Airport, 

TX 

(Lat. 30°29′55′′ N., long. 97°58′10′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 14-mile radius 

of the Point of Origin, and within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Lakeway Airpark, and within a 6.4- 

mile radius of Lago Vista-Rusty Allen 

Airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of 

Austin Executive Airport, and within 2 miles 

each side of the 132° bearing from Austin 

Executive Airport extending from the 6.5- 

mile radius to 10.4 miles southeast of the 

airport, and within 2 miles each side of the 

311° bearing from Austin Executive Airport 

extending from the 6.5-mile radius to 11.2 

miles southeast of the airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on March 16, 

2010. 

Anthony D. Roetzel, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2010–6811 Filed 3–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4901–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0248; Airspace 

Docket No. 10–ANE–10] 

Removal of Class E Airspace, 

Brunswick, ME; and Establishment of 

Class E Airspace, Wiscasset, ME 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

remove Class E airspace at Brunswick, 

ME, as the airport has closed and the 

associated Standard Instrument 

Approach Procedures (SIAPs) removed, 

and to establish Class E airspace at 

Wiscasset, ME, to accommodate the 

SIAPs developed for the airport. This 

action enhances the safety and airspace 

management of Instrument Flight Rules 

(IFR) operations at Wiscasset Airport, 

Wiscasset, ME. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 13, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule 

to: U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey, SE., Washington, DC 

20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–647– 

5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You must 

identify the Docket Number FAA–2010– 

0248; Airspace Docket No. 10–ANE–10, 

at the beginning of your comments. You 

may also submit and review received 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 

Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; 

telephone (404) 305–5610. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested persons are invited to 

comment on this rule by submitting 

such written data, views, or arguments, 

as they may desire. Comments that 

provide the factual basis supporting the 

views and suggestions presented are 

particularly helpful in developing 

reasoned regulatory decisions on the 

proposal. Comments are specifically 

invited on the overall regulatory, 

aeronautical, economic, environmental, 

and energy-related aspects of the 

proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2010–0248; Airspace Docket No. 10– 

ANE–10) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management System (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Comments wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2010–0248; Airspace 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS