alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS (LIQUIDATION BASIS) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(GOING CONCERN BASIS) FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         214,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,363,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,561,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,456,386
<PP&E>                                      21,000,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,382,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,549,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,167,414)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,382,386
<SALES>                                      2,936,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,936,043
<CGS>                                        7,355,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,125,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               941,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,093,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,130,961)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,506,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,624,961)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,624,961)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-10778

Conference Calendar

 

JOHN THOMAS BAGLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN C. VANCE, Dallas County Criminal District Attorney;

KATHERINE ROBINSON, Assistant Criminal Attorney; MARC MOFFITT,

Assistant Criminal Attorney; PATRICIA POPPOFF NOBLE, Assistant

Criminal Attorney; DONALD ROSS, Judge, Criminal District Court

No. 3; MARK TOLLE, Judge, Criminal District Court No. 3; ROBERT

FRANCIS, Judge, Criminal District Court No. 3; JOE KENDALL,

Federal Judge; JORGE A. SOLIS, Federal Judge; WILLIAM SANDERSON,

JR., Magistrate Judge; TED SHINN, Sergeant, Badge #4839; TINA

WEATHERFORD, Badge #5715; ROBERT HUTTOSH, Criminal Prosecutor;

DAN MORALES, State Attorney General; JOHN CORNYN, III; GARY L.

JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; GEORGE W. BUSH, Governor of State of

Texas; JOHN DOE, Mr, 1-15; JANE DOE, 16-30; CITY OF DALLAS;

COUNTY OF DALLAS,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:00-CV-128-T

--------------------

December 13, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
No. 00-10778

-2-

John Thomas Bagley, Texas prisoner No. 652853, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his paid civil rights complaint

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b)(1). Bagley argues that, at his

trial on unspecified state charges, prosecutor Katherine Robinson

and trial judge Donald Ross engaged in a racially-motivated

conspiracy to convict Bagley and that Assistant District Attorney

Patricia Poppoff Noble furthered the conspiracy by arguing that

Bagley’s conviction should be affirmed on direct appeal. 

Bagley’s appellate brief does not mention any other specific

wrongdoing by an individual defendant, but he argues in

conclusional terms that all of the individual defendants

conspired to violate Bagley’s rights to due process and equal

protection because of his race. 

Bagley’s unsubstantiated allegations of a race-based

conspiracy among the defendants fail to give rise to a 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 claim. Babb v. Dorman, 33 F.3d 472, 476 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Bagley does not dispute the district court’s determination that

his claims against Judge Ross are malicious because they

duplicate claims raised in a prior lawsuit. Pittman v. Moore,

980 F.2d 994, 994-95 (5th Cir. 1993). Defendants Robinson and

Noble are entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity for their

respective actions in prosecuting Bagley at trial and in arguing

the state’s case on direct appeal. Graves v. Hampton, 1 F.3d

315, 318 (5th Cir. 1993). Bagley has abandoned the other claims

that he raised in the district court by failing to brief them. 
No. 00-10778

-3-

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we find no error in the district court’s dismissal

of the complaint.

AFFIRMED.
Merrill Lynch

TM Century Inc.
2002 Academy
Dallas, TX 75234-9220

Attention: Mrs. Jeanette Williams

Merrill Lynch
Business Financial Services Inc.
33 West Monroe Street
22rid Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60603
312 269 4447
FAX 312 845 9093

Joseph E. Powaga Credit Analyst

March 3, 1997

Re: WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ("WCMA") No. 586-07R66

Gentlemen:

It is our pleasure to inform you that we have approved
an extension of your WCMA Line of Credit.

As extended, the new Maturity Date for your WCMA Line of
Credit will be February 28, 1998, with all other terms and
conditions of our agreements remaining unchanged.

In connection with this extension, a $1,500.00 fee will be
charged to your WCMA Account.

With so many institutions offering financial services today,
we realize that you have a choice and we thank you for choosing
Merrill Lynch. You are a very important client to us and we hope
that the WCMA Line of Credit has provided better control of your
working capital and helped enhance your company's bottom line.
In addition to the WCMA Line of Credit, Merrill Lynch offers a
broad range of products and services to our business clients including:

Term Financing: Equipment Purchases, Fixed Asset Acquisitions and
ESOP Financing;

Business Advisory Services: Business Valuations, Private Placements,
ESOP Advisory, Acquisition Advisory and Sale of Business;

Business Investment Services: Strategies for Short-term and
Intermediate-term investments; and

Business Financial Planner: Comprehensive business profile for future
management and financial strategy.

Again, we are pleased to provide you with an extension of your WCMA
Line of Credit and would enjoy discussing additional basins services
with you in greater detail. If you have any questions, please contact
Ron Abigail at (214) 750-2102 or the undersigned who is your account
representative in Chicago at (312) 2694447.

Sincerely,

Joseph Powaga

Credit Analyst

nr
cc     Hank O'Neil - MLPF&S - Dallas, TX
Ron Abigail - MLBFS - Dallas, TX
# Official Journal C 201/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 201 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6112 June 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 201

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6112 June 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 201/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8873 — Carlyle/TA Associates/DiscoverOrg)
   (1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 201/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8872 — Advent International/Laird)
   (1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 201/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8873 — Carlyle/TA Associates/DiscoverOrg)
   (1
  )

1

1

2018/C 201/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8872 — Advent International/Laird)
   (1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 201/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2018/C 201/04 | Commission Decision of 7 June 2018 formalising the Commission Customs Policy expert group | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 201/03

Euro exchange rates

2

2018/C 201/04

Commission Decision of 7 June 2018 formalising the Commission Customs Policy expert group

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 201/05 | Interpretative Notice on the application of the prior Union surveillance of imports of on certain iron and steel products and certain aluminium products originating in certain third countries | 8 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 201/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8909 — KME/MKM)
   (1
  ) | 12 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 201/05

Interpretative Notice on the application of the prior Union surveillance of imports of on certain iron and steel products and certain aluminium products originating in certain third countries

8

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 201/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8909 — KME/MKM)
   (1
  )

1

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3023 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3023

            To suspend temporarily the duty on b-Cyfluthrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on b-Cyfluthrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. B-CYFLUTHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      (RS)-a-Cyano-4-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        fluro-3-                                                           31/2015.......
                        phenoxybenzyl(1RS
                        ,3RS;1RS,3SR)-2-
                        (2,2-
                        dichlorovinyl)-
                        2,2-
                        dimethylcycloprop
                        anecarboxylate (b-
                        Cyfluthrin) (CAS
                        No. 68359-37-5)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3808.91.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3042-3043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
    The Executive Session scheduled for Tuesday, January 13, 2009, was 
cancelled.
* * * * *

Date and Time: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 10 a.m.
    This hearing will be continued on Thursday, January 15, 2009, at 10 
a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: Public hearing on Commission policies, practices, and 
procedures.
* * * * *

Date and Time: Thursday, January 15, 2009, Open Meeting (rescheduled to 
begin at 2 p.m.).

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign

[[Page 3043]]

language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 
hours prior to the hearing date.

Person to Contact for Information:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-855 Filed 1-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 293 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 293

 To modify the authority to use Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for 
  proliferation threat reduction projects and activities outside the 
                   states of the former Soviet Union.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2011

   Mr. Lugar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the authority to use Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for 
  proliferation threat reduction projects and activities outside the 
                   states of the former Soviet Union.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nunn-Lugar Global Cooperative Threat 
Reduction Improvement Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO USE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 
              FUNDS OUTSIDE THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.

    Section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2004 (22 U.S.C. 5963) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``, with the concurrence 
        of the Secretary of State,''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, with the 
                concurrence of the Secretary of State''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and the 
                Secretary of State''.
                                 <all>
```
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1131 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-34-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Coherance Check 160.0 $13,600.

00 $0 $13,600.00 1,420 $19,312,000.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $19,312,000

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): The assumption 

that each engine requires a coherence check each day is inaccurate. Therefore, a hours-to-cycle 

conversion ratio was obtained from Turbomeca. It was assumed that a coherence check would be 
performed after each cycle, which leads to a more accurate prediction for the number of coherence 

checks per year. The annual operating hours and conversion ratio were used to find the average 

number of cycles per year for the fleet. Since some engines accumulate more than 365 cycles in 

one year, the estimate was capped at 365. Based on these numbers, we estimated 320 coherence 

checks would be required on average per engine - which is conservative. To determine the hourly 

cost: 320*0.5 hours per check = 160 hours of labor per year. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph J. Kelly, certify that

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports on
    Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
    of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
    IndyMac Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-2;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
    whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
    of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
    as of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
    to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
    servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included
    in these reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
    the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with
    the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and except as
    disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
    the servicing agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
    servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
    report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
    review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
    Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
    servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: IndyMac Bank F.S.B., as
servicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as certificate trustee and
as indenture trustee.

Date: April 1, 2005

By: /s/:Joseph J. Kelly
Name: Joseph J. Kelly
Title: Senior Vice President
Company: Lehman ABS Corp.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3044 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain suspension system stabilizer 

bars. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain suspension 

system stabilizer bars. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SUSPENSION SYSTEM STABILIZER 

4 BARS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3044 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Suspension system stabilizer 

bars of alloy steel, each 

weighing approximately 42 

kg, the foregoing comprising 

one rod measuring approximately 98.8 cm in length at 

each end of which is welded 

at approximately right angles 

a rod measuring approximately 51 cm in length, designed for use in Class 7 and 

8 trucks only, certified by the 

importer as of Japan JIS 

grade SCM525S (26CrMo4) 

or SCM435H (34CrMo4) 

steel (provided for in subheading 8708.80.65) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Partners Financial Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-KSB Report of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Charles T. DeBilioCharles T. DeBilioSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




July 7, 2005