alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3063 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3063

To suspend temporarily the duty on knit garments of stretch fabric with 
textile or polymer-based electrodes knit into or attached to the fabric 
   and that incorporate connectors designed to secure an electronic 
     transmitter that transmits physiological information from the 
                  electrodes to a compatible monitor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2012

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on knit garments of stretch fabric with 
textile or polymer-based electrodes knit into or attached to the fabric 
   and that incorporate connectors designed to secure an electronic 
     transmitter that transmits physiological information from the 
                  electrodes to a compatible monitor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KNIT GARMENTS OF STRETCH FABRIC WITH TEXTILE OR POLYMER-
              BASED ELECTRODES KNIT INTO OR ATTACHED TO THE FABRIC AND 
              THAT INCORPORATE CONNECTORS DESIGNED TO SECURE AN 
              ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTER THAT TRANSMITS PHYSIOLOGICAL 
              INFORMATION FROM THE ELECTRODES TO A COMPATIBLE MONITOR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Knit garments of    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        stretch fabric                                                     31/2015.......
                        with textile or
                        polymer-based
                        electrodes knit
                        into or attached
                        to the fabric and
                        that incorporate
                        connectors
                        designed to
                        secure an
                        electronic
                        transmitter that
                        transmits
                        physiological
                        information from
                        the electrodes to
                        a compatible
                        monitor (provided
                        for in subheading
                        6110.30.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roubik Gregorian, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.

Date: November 8, 2006



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Roubik Gregorian                           
|Roubik Gregorian                               
|Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 312 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal certain 

limitations on health care benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2011 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. BURR, Mr. COBURN, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. 

COLLINS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. RISCH, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to repeal certain limitations on health care benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patients’ Freedom to 

5 Choose Act’’. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 312 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MEDICINE QUALI2 FIED ONLY IF FOR PRESCRIBED DRUG OR IN3 SULIN. 

4 Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Afford5 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148) and the amendments 

6 made by such section are repealed; and the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such section, and 

8 amendments, had never been enacted. 

9 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON HEALTH FLEXIBLE 

10 SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS UNDER CAFE11 TERIA PLANS. 

12 Sections 9005 and 10902 of the Patient Protection 

13 and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) and sec14 tion 1403 of the Health Care and Education Reconcili15 ation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152) and the amend16 ments made by such sections are repealed. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

__2012

________ - NM -

___ 03 2

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant ? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2836 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2836

           To reduce temporarily the duty on sodium alginate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

  Ms. Collins introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To reduce temporarily the duty on sodium alginate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM ALGINATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.--.--      Sodium alginate     2.1%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (CAS No. 9005-38-                                                  31/2015.......
                        3) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3913.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Exhibit 11. Statement re computation of per share earnings
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Three Months Ended,
                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              March 31, 2001                           March 31, 2000
                                  ---------------------------------------   ------------------------------------
                                                 Weighted        Per                      Weighted        Per
                                                  Average       Share                      Average       Share
                                    Income        Shares       Amount         Income       Shares       Amount

                                  ---------     ----------  ------------    ----------   -----------  ----------
<S>                             <C>            <C>         <C>             <C>          <C>          <C>
Basic Earnings per
  Common Share
Income available to
  common shareholders               $2,331        6,540        $0.36          $1,890       6,583         $0.29
                                                            ============                              ==========

Effect of Dilutive Shares
Options issued to
  management                             -           22                           -           27
                                  ---------     ----------                  ----------   -----------

Diluted Earnings per
  Common Share                      $2,331        6,562        $0.36          $1,890         6,610       $0.29
                                  =========     ==========  ============    ==========   ===========  ==========





















</TABLE>
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: MAY 12, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2013-0848 ENDLESS MOUNTAINS AIR, INC. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2012EA50008 Respondent
ORDERCONTINUING SECOND LITIGATION CONFERENCE OnMarch 18, 2014, an Order Setting Motion Deadlines and Setting a Second Rule 16 Litigation Conference was filed. Among otherthings, this Order set the Second Litigation Conference for May 13,2014, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern time. OnMay 12, 2014, the Office ofHearings staffcontacted the FAA attorney (via e-mail) andthe Respondent's representative (viatelephone) to notify eachthat the Second Litigation Conference needed to be continued, and to determine a date upon which to reconvene. Having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; ItIs Hereby Ordered: 1. Pursuantto 14 C.P.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(1), the Second Litigation Conference is continued. 2. The parties shall reconvene for the Second Litigation Conference onWednesday, May 

### 28,2014, at 

### 1:00 p.m. Eastern time. 3. A separate Order shall issue onthe FAA'sMotion for Decision.

Attachment: Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Mr. Zachary M. Berman 

### Complainant's Counsel ONE COPY

Office ofRegional Counsel, Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 

### Mr. William J. Dobitsch, Jr. Endless Mountains Air, Inc. 

### Respondent Seamans Airport 727 Windsock Lane Factoryville, P A 18419 FAX: 570-945-5953 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) ·Washington, DC 20590

TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0848 (CivilPenalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use thefollowing address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
April 10, 2006

AGA Chemicals America, Inc.

Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.

Answers to EPA’s inquiries in Ms. Margaret Sheppar’s e-mail to Mr. David Ferguson dated 

March 1, 2006 concerning SNAP application of Asahiklin AE-3000

1) Additional toxicity studies data: please refer to attached revised Table 2.

2) Flash point data: please refer to attached Analysis Report (Attachment 1) prepared by 

Sumika Chemical Analysis Services Ltd. We also carried out the test by Cleveland Open 

Cup tester ASTM D92-05a. The substance also has no flash point.

3) Flammability limits: tests were carried out by ASTM E681-01 method. We could not find 

any flammability for any mixtures of the substance and air. I addition, flammable solvent 

HFC-365mfc (CF3CH2CF2CH3) which has flammability limit 5-9vol% in air becomes 

nonflammable with adding only 1.5vol% of the substance, AE-3000. The experimental 

data (Attachment 2) is attached. In the figure, circle (O) means flammable and x means 

nonflammable.

4) Ozone depletion potential: the substance does not contain any bromine and chlorine atoms 

in the molecule. So, it has no ozone depletion potential.

5) Global warming potential: the GWP value was calculated based on the test results by 

Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth in Japan. Unfortunately, the 

paper is written in Japanese and a report describes such calculation in English is not 

published. But the GWP value is shown in the report “Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and 

the Global Climate System” published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 

Change in 2005. Please refer to attached copy of the report (Attachment 3). The value is 

540 (100yrs ITH) in the report.

6) Atmospheric lifetime: please refer to attached copy of J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 

1165-1170 (Attachment 4).

7) Protective equipment: respiratory protection for organic chemicals approved by NIOSH is 

recommended. In case of very high concentration, self-contained breathing apparatus is 

recommended. To protect hand and eye, impermeable gloves and chemical splash goggles 

are recommended, respectively. Local exhaust should be used if large amount of the 

substance are released. Mechanical ventilation should be used in low places.

8) Degradation products: this substance may be decomposed by high temperature (open 

flames, glowing metal surfaces, electrical heating elements and so on) forming 

hydrofluoric acids, carbonyl fluoride, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. 

9) Regulation under environmental regulatory statutes other than VOC: none.

10) Regulation under health and safety related statutes authorities: we have submitted PNM 
of TSCA and waiting the approval from US EPA. No regulations are made by FDA, OSHA, 

DOT and so on.

11) Manufacture site: Japan. We do not have any plan to manufacture this substance in the 

US right now.

12) Material Safety Data Sheet: please refer to attached copy.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee
Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



Dated
June 14, 2010

/s/ GERARDO I. LOPEZ Gerardo I. Lopez Chief Executive Officer, Director and President/s/ CRAIG R. RAMSEY Craig R. Ramsey Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Marquee Holdings Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9181]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 15, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina, and NB 
Holdings Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares and thereby indirectly acquire Bank of America 
North Carolina, National Association, Charlotte, North Carolina (in 
organization).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 17, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-9181 Filed 4-21;-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











/S/ Ron Ruskowsky


Ron Ruskowsky


Chief Executive Officer


May 10, 2011
Docket No. FAA-2016-5035

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 3/10/15

Regional Airline Association 3/10/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 3/10/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 3/10/15
### Re: Q on the 6/10ths rule Phyllis Fox to: Joe Kordzi 09/30/2010 02:15 PM History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

I still get about 0.51. For Sooner, the Option 1 case that was costed remains at 6,015 lb/hr. Your new case, 0.51 to 0.06 lb/MMBtu, the SO2 removed is (5611 MMBtu/hr)(0.055 lb/MMBtu) = 308.6 lb/hr. (I used 0.055 instead of 0.06 to build in a safety factor. They actually used 91.5% in their calcs, I assume building in a safety factor (511 lb/hr/5611 MMBtu/hr = 0.091 lb/MMBtu). Thus, the SO 2 removed for your case is (2,605 - 309) = 2,296 lb/hr and the size factor is(2,296/6,015)^0.69 = 0.5145. For Muskogee, your case's SO2 reductions (5480 MMBtu/hr)(0.055) = 301.4 lb/hr. The SO2 reductions: 2778 - 301 = 2477 lb/hr. The size factor: (2477/6442)^0.69 = 0.5171. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:21 AM , <Kordzi.Joe@epamail.epa.gov> wrote: > Hi Phyllis, > > When you calculate the size factor of 0.51 to go from option 1 to option 2, > you do the following as described by footnote 20: > > For Sooner, from 12/28/09 S&L FollowUp Report, pdf 76 - 77, high sulfur case > (Option 1), the scrubber inlet SO2 ("ID Fan Outlet") is 6,015 lb/hr and the > outlet ("Stack Inlet") is 511 lb/hr. Thus , 6,015 - 511 = 5,504 lb/hr of SO2 > is removed. For Sooner, low sulfur case (Option 2), the scrubber inlet SO2 > is 2,605 lb/hr and the outlet is 513 lb/h r. Thus, 2,605 - 513 = 2,092 lb/hr > of SO2 is removed. The size factor is: (2,092/5,504)0.69 = 0.51. > > If I wanted to go from option 1 to a smaller scrubber that didn't clean to > 0.10, but cleaned to 0.06 to calculate costs for purposes of the Unfundated > Mandate Review Act (new Option 3), should I calculate the size factor like > this? > > For Sooner Option 3, the scrubber outlet is calculated as: > > 0.51 lbs/MMBtu = 0.06 lbs/MMBtu > 2,605 lbs/hr x > > x = 306 lbs/hr > > Thus, 2,605 - 306 lbs/hr = 2,299 lbs/hr SO2 is removed. The size factor is > (2,299/5,504) = 0.42. Assumed the same for Muskogee. > > > Regards, > > Joe > > " ... and miles to go before I sleep." > -- Robert Frost > >
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pak Mail Centers of America, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, P. Evan Lasky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/      P. Evan Lasky
--------------------------------
         P. Evan Lasky
         Chief Executive Officer
         January 8, 2003