alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                              C.E.O. Certification




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Red Butte  Energy,  Inc.  on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Spooner, Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



 /s/ Charles Spooner
Charles Spooner
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2002
Exhibit 10.1


Exhibit 10.1
<PAGE>




                    ZING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                     EXHIBIT 11-STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF
                 COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED            NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                            MARCH 31,                   MARCH 31,
                                                                       1997           1996           1997         1996
                                                                      --------------------------------------------------
                                                                           (000's Omitted, except per share data)
                                                                      --------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>           <C>             <C>          <C>
Average shares outstanding.......................................      2,482         2,638           2,495        2,609

Net effect of dilutive stock warrants - based
     on the treasury stock method using average market price.....          4            42               4           44
                                                                       -----         -----           -----        ------
Shares used for computation......................................      2,486         2,680           2,499        2,653
                                                                       =====         =====           =====        =====

Net income.......................................................      $ 785         $ 491         $ 2,163      $ 3,253
                                                                       =====         =====         =======      =======
Income per Common and Common
     Equivalent Share:
Net income.......................................................     $ 0.31         $0.18          $ 0.86       $ 1.23
                                                                      =======        =====          ======       ======

</TABLE>

                                  Page 14 of 14

<PAGE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

O-GA-- 

Eononblo tamr L t;iuq 

Dlnotor, Motor Tranrportmtion Diti8lon 

&llro*4 Comd..ioa or 2.x.. 

AW tin, kxa. 

Dear “ira opinion ‘40, pro75 

El.1 can the hi1.m.d h..li.rlon 

of Tua. le1~al1.1 l mpmaiw 

the tu dum &or %otion 

l5, Aeiola ala, k.CJ. of 

Tua.. 

M O l ok~~wledgo rooolpt o f your nqum8t r0r aa opipi0n 

of tai. Doputmmnt on the quortioa atot. utat.4. 

The faot8 with rofaronor to th. opinion rep& .r. 

.I r0ilm: 

Tho Crown &mob Ccmpuv ir l olotor mhlolo oomn 

carrier of paru@naur for hir. .ng 

'f 

d in lntorrkto oonoroo. 

It. o oration. in-%X.8 -0 wholly 

PI 

BtW8tda in t&t it 

true 8 rout* on u. 6. Hi&.tn 

throo rAlo8 north OS Tmrkam I 

Ro. Tl, whloh for two or 

r.rhollr within tho stat. of 

Irxu and than 8aid hi&my 6008 into tho City oi Tuukana 

onrhdf in Tuu .o(l onehalt in Arkama8. 

that tha pr.ri.1.oa. of ktirl. 

vi806 Cl+11 Ytatuto8, IO=, are in tiel 1a~u.o of the #dual Conatltution. 

Soworor’, It 1. dllill(l by my 01 .o~Q#Z'O~.. to piy ow-h.U 

of the tu. 

The praou~o ~que8tion mu a8k u8 to rem3er.m opinion 

on 18: 

*CM we log.Uy makr th. oo8promi.a an thi? nttorV 
Bon. Jti. x. IcllQry, Rag4 6 

Artiole 3, %otion 66, of tha Coustltutioi of Texea 

proil do. t 

.l’ho Logislaturo oh611 iiaveno pomr to 

releaar or l xtlngulsh, or to authorize the re1#6147 or extln@,ulnhlog, in wfxlc+ ar in part, the 

lndsbtednesa, ~llablllty or obllcation of any oorpomtlon or lndirldwl, to this stats . . . exoept 

dellnquoat taxer which have bden d\;e “or n period 

OS at 14a.t tm y68ro.* 

k aompromlss of thie tax would in effaot relmsa or 

l xtlngulsh the balrnoo duo if said Mticlo 9116, Seotlon 16, 

1s not ln violetion of tha Bsderal Constltutlcn a8 applied 

to carrluo engagsd wholly In lnter6tato CCi::rierCO. xi ths 

ect,larylnl: said tax 10 unconstitutlonnl, tho Crown Coaoh 

Company would sot be obligated to pay my s-11.. You are, 

thoreiOr0, ndr!.ssd that you camot legally compruu.loe thlr 

tax ehlm. 

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           50785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3270
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 64985
<PP&E>                                            1508
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   82063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           535918
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        282953
<OTHER-SE>                                     3476909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     82063
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                236916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              144889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (381805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-53 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:

/s/ Nancy H. ForteName:
    Nancy H. ForteTitle:
    Assistant Vice President Date: March 29, 2005
| (1) | such      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bridge      Capital Holdings. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 16, 2010 | /s/ Daniel P. Myers                |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                      | Daniel      P. Myers               |
|                      | President                          |
|                      | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                      | (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 /s/
      Ron RuskowskyRon
      Ruskowsky
                        Chief
      Financial Officer
                        May
      14, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2986 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2986

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain magnesium 
                               peroxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain magnesium 
                               peroxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MAGNESIUM PEROXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.87 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Magnesium peroxide, minimum 
25 percent purity) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Sylvia Soto, Individually and 

as Representative of the Estate 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 4, 2014

No. 04-13-00822-CV

WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY L.P. d/b/a Princeton Place Rehabilitation and 

Healthcare,

Appellant

v.

Sylvia SOTO, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Narcisa Dimas, Deceased, 

Ruby Buentello, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Manuel Riojas Munoz, 

Deceased, and Adela Barboza, Individually,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-05792

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion to abate this appeal because one of the issues presented in 

the appeal is the same issue pending in petitions for review filed in Williamsburg Care Co. L.P. 

v. Acosta, 406 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), Fredericksburg Care Co. 

L.P. v. Lira, 407 S.W.3d 810 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), and Fredericksburg 

Care Co. L.P. v. Perez, 406 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed). This court 

has considered the motion, the appellees’ response, and the appellant’s reply to the appellees’ 

response. In light of the pending higher court review of the precedent previously established by 

this court, the court has determined that abating this appeal pending the Texas Supreme Court’s 

resolution of the issue will likely achieve the greatest judicial efficiency. Accordingly, 

appellant’s motion to abate is GRANTED. For administrative purposes, this appeal will be 

treated as a closed case, unless and until appellant files a motion requesting its reinstatement 

following the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the issue.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Research, Education, and Economics Office, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of public comment period for written stakeholder input; second correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Research, Education, and Extension Office (REEO) of the Research, Education, and Economics (REE) Mission Area of the Department of Agriculture published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 1, 2009, concerning written stakeholder input on the preparation of a roadmap for the REEO. The document contained an incorrect word in the background and purpose section which is listed under the supplementary information section of the notice. The correction notice was published on April 10, 2009. However, the correction notice still contained an incorrect word in the background and purpose section.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michele Simmons, 202-720-1777.

## Second Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 10, 2009, in FR Doc. E9-7252, on page 14768,  in the fifth column, correct section to read as follows:                    

## Background and Purpose

The preparation of the roadmap for agricultural research, education, and extension is mandated in section 7504 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (FCEA) of 2008, (Pub. L. 110-246, U.S.C. 7614a). The Secretary, acting  through the Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Economics (Under Secretary), will prepare the Roadmap.

Dated: April 16, 2009.

Yvette Anderson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer for Agriculture Research Service.

[FR Doc. E9-9201 Filed 4-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2250

MONTE MEDLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-2388-8-AW) Submitted: July 30, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jay L. Cohen, Chevy Chase, Maryland, for Appellant. Edward J. Efkeman, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Monte Medley appeals from the order of the district court awarding summary judgment to Federal Express Corporation (“Fedex”) and dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Md. Ann. Code, art. 49B, § 42 (2003). Because the district court erroneously denied as “moot” Medley’s motion for an extension of the discovery period and otherwise failed to address his motion for discovery in opposition to summary judgment, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings. As part of the discovery process, Medley sought certain records of similarly situated Fedex employees, and Fedex objected. Fedex also declined to turn over the documents at a deposition conducted on March 25, 2003. On March 26, 2003, the final day of the discovery period, Medley filed a motion to further extend the discovery period to facilitate the filing of a motion to compel discovery. OnApril 24, 2003, Fedex filed a motion for summary judgment. On May 15, 2003, with the summary judgment motion still pending, the district court entered a “paperless order” denying Medley’s motion for additional discovery as “moot.” Medley then responded to the summary judgment motion and again moved for additional discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f). On July 15, 2003, the district court filed a memorandum opinion and order awarding summary judgment to Fedex, implicitly denying Medley’s motion under Rule 56(f), and dismissing his complaint.- 3 - Medley’s motion for extended discovery was not moot at the time it was denied by the district court. Moreover, the district court did not address Medley’s motion under Rule 56(f) in its opinion and order dismissing Medley’s complaint. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court, and we remand for the court to consider Medley’s motion for an extension of discovery and Rule 56(f) motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
# Official Journal L 207/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 207 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 508 August 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 207

English edition

Legislation

Volume 508 August 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 938/2007 of 7 August 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 939/2007 of 7 August 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 917/2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 797/2004 on measures improving general conditions for the production and marketing of apiculture products | 3 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 940/2007 of 7 August 2007 approving minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Noix du Périgord (PDO)) | 5 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 941/2007 of 7 August 2007 on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (peaches) | 12 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 938/2007 of 7 August 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 939/2007 of 7 August 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 917/2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 797/2004 on measures improving general conditions for the production and marketing of apiculture products

3

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 940/2007 of 7 August 2007 approving minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Noix du Périgord (PDO))

5

Commission Regulation (EC) No 941/2007 of 7 August 2007 on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (peaches)

12

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.