alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3157 

To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic filament tow imported in the 

form of bundles of crimped product of 250,000 to 350,000 filaments 

(plus or minus 10 percent) with an average decitex of 2.4 to 3.7 (plus 

or minus 10 percent) and length greater than 2 meters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic filament tow 

imported in the form of bundles of crimped product 

of 250,000 to 350,000 filaments (plus or minus 10 percent) with an average decitex of 2.4 to 3.7 (plus or 

minus 10 percent) and length greater than 2 meters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3157 IS

1 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC FILAMENT TOW IMPORTED IN THE 

2 FORM OF BUNDLES OF CRIMPED PRODUCT 

3 OF 250,000 TO 350,000 FILAMENTS (PLUS OR 

4 MINUS 10 PERCENT) WITH AN AVERAGE 

5 DECITEX OF 2.4 TO 3.7 (PLUS OR MINUS 10 

6 PERCENT) AND LENGTH GREATER THAN 2 

7 METERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

9 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

10 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

11 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic filament tow 

(polyacrylonitrile tow) containing by weight 92 percent 

or more of polyacrylonitrile, 

not more than 0.01 percent 

of zinc and 2 percent or more 

but not over 8 percent of 

water, imported in the form 

of bundles of crimped product 

of 250,000 to 350,000 filaments (plus or minus 10 percent) with an average decitex 

of 2.4 to 3.7 (plus or minus 

10 percent) and length greater than 2 meters (provided 

for in subheading 

5501.30.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

14 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEYUN KIM,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73640

Agency No. A098-251-915

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 18, 2015**

San Francisco, California

Before: CHRISTEN and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges and LEMELLE,***

 

District Judge.

Seyun Kim, a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of a 

Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Ivan L.R. Lemelle, District Judge for the U.S. District 

Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

FILED

SEP 23 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 
judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We deny the 

petition for review. “[F]orced conscription or punishment for evasion of military 

duty generally does not constitute persecution on account of a protected ground.”

Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2005). Kim has presented 

no “evidence that [he] would be singled out for severe disproportionate punishment 

for refusing to serve in the [South Korean] military.” Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 

F.3d 1182, 1188 (9th Cir. 2006); cf. id. at 1187 (citing cases involving examples of 

severe disproportionate punishment).

DENIED.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Howard Socol, as Chief Executive Officer of Barneys New York, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

(1)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
     year ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S. Securities
     and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated April 30, 2004
                                                        /s/ Howard Socol
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Howard Socol
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
Converted by EDGARwiz


EXHIBIT 10.2




Agreement No:  2006-07234

Sponsor:  Sungen Energy







AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO SPONSORED RESEARCH AGREEMENT







This Amendment No.01 to Research Agreement #2006-07234 is between the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (“Illinois”) and Sungen Energy, Inc. (“Company”).  




WHEREAS, the parties identified above have entered into Research Agreement # 2006-07234, for a research project entitled “Power Nano Windows”, the term of which will expire on August 22, 2008;  and




WHEREAS, said parties desire to amend the Research Agreement as follows:




Section 1.1

Statement of Work

Exhibit A is hereby amended to expand the research project as described in Exhibit A-1, attached and incorporated herein.




Section 2.1

Payment

The Sponsor has agreed to provide an additional $203,617 to the previously awarded amount of $219,201.  Therefore, the first sentence of Article 2.1 has been deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the following: 




“Company agrees to pay Illinois the fixed sum of $422,818 (U.S.) for all of the services to be provided by Illinois in accordance with its performance of the Research Project.”




The payment chart in Section 2.1 shall be deleted and replaced with the following:




Payment#

Due Date

Amount

1

Upon execution of this Agreement

  $2,000.00

2

1   month after Effective Date of this Agreement

$27,150.12

3

4   months after Effective Date of this Agreement

$27,150.12

4

7   months after Effective Date of this Agreement

$27,150.12

5

10 months after Effective Date of this Agreement

$27,150.12

6

13 months after Effective Date of this Agreement

$78,054.38

7

16 months after Effective Date of this Agreement

$78,054.38

8

19 months after Effective Date of this Agreement 

$78,054.38

9

23 months after Effective Date of this Agreement

$78,054.38

Total

            $422,818.00




THEREFORE, said parties now mutually agree to amend this Sponsored Research Agreement No. 2006-07234 under the same terms and conditions as set forth in the original Agreement, effective as of July 5, 2007. 





























THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE

SUNGEN ENERGY, INC.

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS




/s/ Walter K. Knorr

/s/ Harmel S. Rayat

Walter K. Knorr, Comptroller

Harmel S. Rayat, President




Attest:




/s/ Michele M. Thompson

Michele M. Thompson








Exhibit A-1




Nayfeh-Sungen Energy, Inc. Sponsored Research Agreement Statement of Work







The two sides agreed to inject additional funding to allow better strategic planning, additional purchases or upgrades of equipment and additional hiring.  The increase in the budgeted support for personnel and equipment is intended to speed up the routine steps, probe the parameter phase space, and the full proof of concept in the shortest period of time.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, Richard M. Beyer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intersil Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Daniel E. OSBORNE, Appellant, v. Lisa C. CARPENTER, f/k/a Lisa C. Osborne, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1998 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-24-1998

United States v. Walker

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-3531

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1998 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"United States v. Walker" (1998). 1998 Decisions. Paper 234.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998/234
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 No. 97-3531 

 

 USA v. Walker 

 The following modifications have been made to the Court's 

opinion issued on August 19, 1998, in the above-entitled appeal 

and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: 

 The slip opinion in the above case erroneously list Jarvis F. Tait 

as "Esquire" and 

as an Assistant United States Attorney. The correct title for Mr. Tait 

should be "Legal Intern." 

 

 

 /s/ P. Douglas Sisk, 

 Clerk 

Dated: September 24, 1998
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)








In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zhao Yan Ding,
the chief executive officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 13,, 2009By:
                        /s/
      Zhao Yan DingZhao
      Yan Ding,
CEO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ALR TECHNOLOGIES INC.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Sidney Chan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 17th day of May, 2006.



| | SIDNEY CHAN                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Sidney Chan                                        
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer























---
Hide Details

EPA/ICAC Industrial Source Roundtable Meeting - SSM

Thu 09/20/2012 2:00 PM - 2:30 

PM

Attendance is optional for Lisa Sutton

Chair: Phil Lorang/RTP/USEPA/US

Location: Room C111B

This entry has an alarm. The alarm will go off 15 minutes before the entry starts.

This entry does not block your busy time.

Required:

Optional: Krishna Viswanathan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lisa Sutton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

__________________

We only have 30 minutes for SSM, if one of you can attend so that any questions they have can be 

fielded by one of you, that would be great. Otherwise I will just take their questions and any that are not 

easy or obvious, I will take them down and commit to getting back to them.

Let me know if either of you (or both) are available.

thanks !

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

EPA/ICAC Industrial Source Roundtable Meeting

September 20, 2012

Room C111B

Agenda

9:30 -9:40

Introductions

9:40-10:10

RTR rules - Ongoing and Envisioned Activities (Steve Fruh and Brian Shrager, 

Description
OAQPS)

10:10-10:40

Oil and Gas Rules (Bruce Moore, OAQPS)

10:40-11:10

Petroleum Refineries (Brenda Shine, OAQPS)

11:10 -11:20

Break

11:20-11:50

Portland Cement Rulemaking (Keith Barnett, OAQPS)

11:50-12:20

Discussion, Q&A

12:20-1:00

Lunch

1:00-1:30

RICE Rules – An Overview (Melanie King, OAQPS)

1:30-2:00

Nitric Acid NSPS (Nate Topham and Bill Neuffer, OAQPS)

2:00- 2:30

Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (Debra Dalcher and Matt Witosky, OAQPS)

2:30-2:40

Break

2:40-3:10
Electronic Reporting (Robert Schell, OAQPS)

3:10-3:40

MATS Related Activity (ICAC)

3:40- 4:10

Industrial Trends and Road Blocks to Compliance (ICAC)

4:10-4:20 

Wrap-up and identification of follow-up issues

Matthew Witosky

Policy and Strategies Group

Sector Policy and Programs Division

OAQPS

919-541-2865

witosky.matthew@epa.gov

Personal Notes
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1 22 6 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 -NM - 006 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Deloitte & Touche

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 1800
50 South Main Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84144-0458
Telephone: (801) 328-4706
Facsimile: (801) 355-7515

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'REPORT

To the Supervisory Committee of America First Credit Union:

We have examined  management's  assertion  about  America  First Credit  Union's
(AFCU's)  compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP)as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 included
in the accompanying  management assertion.  Management is responsible for AFCU's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on management's  assertion about AFCU's  compliance  based on
our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about AFCU's  compliance with the minimum
servicing  standards  and  performing  such other  procedures  as we  considered
necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination  provides a
reasonable  basis for our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not  provide a legal
determination on AFCU's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In  our  opinion,   managements   assertion's   that  AFCU   complied  with  the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31,1999 is fairly stated , in all material respects.

Deloitte & Touche

March 24,2000
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700239

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

DAVID L. CAPLES

Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew J. Kent, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, I Marine Expeditionary 

Force, U.S. Marine Corps Forces Pacific, Camp Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Major Rebecca M. Harvey, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Major J.S. Kresge, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 11 January 2018

_________________________

Before MARKS, JONES, and KOVAC, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3130 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fluopyram. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fluopyram. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUOPYRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 N-{2-[3-Chloro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)-2- 

pyridinyl]ethyl}-α,α,αtrifluoro-o-toluamide 

(Fluopyram) (CAS No. 

658066–35–4) (provided for 

in subheading 2933.39.21) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3130 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS