2

- i CHAPTER 2. MARKET ASSESSMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2.1 BACKGROUND AND DEFINITIONS

................................ ................................ .......... 2

- 1 2.1.1 Water

- cooled and Evaporatively

- cooled Air Conditioners

................................ .. 2

- 1 2.1.2 Variable Refrigerant Flow Commercial Package Air Conditioning and Heating Equipment

................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 2

- 2 2.1.3 Computer Rooms Air Conditioners

................................ ................................ ..... 2

- 3 2.1.4 Federal Energy Conservation Standards

................................ .............................. 2

- 5 2.1.5 ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 Equipment Classes and Efficiency Levels

......... 2

- 7 2.2 MARKET ASSESSMENT

................................ ................................ ............................ 2

- 10 2.2.1 Trade Associations

................................ ................................ ............................. 2

- 11 2.2.2 Manufacturers

................................ ................................ ................................ .... 2

- 11 2.2.3 Market Performance Data

................................ ................................ .................. 2

- 12

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1.1 Current Federal Energy Conservation Sta ndards for Commercial Package Air Conditioning and Heating Equipment Classes with Increased or New Efficiency Levels in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010

................................ ............................. 2

- 6 Table 2.1.2 Equipment Classes With Updated Ef ficiency Levels in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010

................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 2

- 8 Table 2.2.1 Manufacturers of the Commercial Equipment Included in this Rulemaking

......... 2

- 12 Table 2.2.2 CEC Computer Room Air Conditioners Minimum Efficiency Levels

................... 2

- 19 Table 2.2.3 Computer Room Air Conditioner Database Breakdown

................................ ........ 2

- 20 Table 2.2.4 Average SCOP for Computer Room Air Conditioners

................................ .......... 2

- 212

- ii LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.2.1 EER Histogram of Small Water

- cooled Air Condition ers

................................ .... 2

- 14 Figure 2.2.2 EER Histogram of Large Water

- cooled Air Conditioners

................................ .... 2

- 15 Figure 2.2.3 EER Histogram of Very Large Water

- cooled Air Conditioners

........................... 2

- 15 Figure 2.2.4 Histogram of Water

- Source VRF Systems ( ≥ 135,000 Btu/h) with No Heat Recovery

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 2

- 18 Figure 2.2.5 Hist ogram of Water

- Source VRF Systems (≥135,000 Btu/h) with Heat Recovery

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ ... 2

- 18 Figure 2.2.6 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (<65,000) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 2

- 22 Figure 2.2.7 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (<65,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ ... 2

- 23 Figure 2.2.8 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ ............................... 2

- 24 Figure 2.2.9 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

................................ ................................ ................................ 2

- 24 Figure 2.2.10 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ .................... 2

- 25 Figure 2.2 .11 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ ................................ ........................... 2

- 26 Figure 2.2.12 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 2

- 26 Figure 2.2.13 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ .................... 2

- 27 Figure 2.2.14 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥65, 000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

................................ ................................ .................... 2

- 27 Figure 2.2.15 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ .................... 2

- 28 Figure 2.2.16 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) With a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ ........... 2

- 28 Figure 2.2.17 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) with a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

........... 2

- 29 Figure 2.2.18 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h) with a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

........... 2

- 30 Figure 2.2.19 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ ................................ ........................... 2

- 30 Figure 2.2.20 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 2

- 312

- iii Figure 2.2.21 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner ( ≥ 65,000 and <240,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ ............................... 2

- 32 Figure 2.2.22 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥240,000 and <760,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ ............................... 2

- 33 Figure 2.2.23 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) with a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

................................ ........... 2

- 33 Figure 2.2.24 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥65,000 and <240,000 Btu/h) with a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

...................... 2

- 34 Figure 2.2.25 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room A ir Conditioner (≥240,000 and <760,000 Btu/h) With a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

..................... 2

- 352

- 1 2.1 BACKGROUND AND DEFINITIONS

The American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air

- Conditioning Engineers (AS HRAE) released an updated version of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/ASHRAE/Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Standard 90.1 (hereinafter referred to as ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010) on October 29, 2010. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 included increased efficiency levels for water

- cooled and evaporatively

cooled commercial package air conditioners (triggering DOE review of the minimum standards for these equipment classes) and created a new set of equipment classes for variab le refrigerant flow (VRF) products (which were previously covered as small, large, and very large commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment) and for air conditioners and condensing units serving computer rooms ( i.e. , computer room air condi tioners) . ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 also increased its efficiency level for certain classes of water

- source VRF commercial package heat pumps in comparison to the existing Federal standards that would apply, thereby triggering DOE review of the standards f or those equipment classes.

2.1.1 Water

- cooled and Evaporatively

- cooled Air Conditioners

Water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners are part of a subset of commercial package air cond itioning and heating equipment. EPCA defines a “commercial packa ge air conditioning and heating equipment” as an “air

- cooled, water

- cooled, evaporatively

cooled, or water

- source (not including ground water

- source ) electrically operated, unitary central air conditioners and central air conditioning heat pumps for commer cial application.” (42 U.S.C. 6311(8)(A))

Air conditioners use a refrigeration cycle to cool an indoor space by moving heat from the cold location to a hotter location by means of evaporating and condensing a fluid, typically a refrigerant. An air condit ioner typically has four major components: a compressor, condensing coil, expansion valve, and an evaporator coil. The compressor turns the refrigerant from a low pressure gas into a high pressure gas, which raises the temperature of the gas. At the next s tep, the condensing coil convects the heat from the hot refrigerant, which condenses into a liquid, still at a high temperature and high pressure. This liquid refrigerant then goes through an expansion valve that lowers the refrigerant’s pressure and tempe rature before entering the evaporator coil. The evaporator coil cools the indoor air by transferring heat from the warmer indoor air to the low temperature refrigerant.

Commercial

- size w ater

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners cool commercia l facilities and utilize water instead of ambient air (as is used in air

- cooled equipment) to cool the condensing coil

. In the case of a water

- cooled air conditioner, the condensing coil is submerged in circulating water; whereas in the case of evaporative ly

- cooled air conditioner, the2

- 2 condensing coil is sprayed with water that evaporate s as air passes over the coil. Both systems utilize the high heat capacity of water to optimize the heat transfer from the refri gerant in the condensing coil. Water

- cooled a ir conditioners can be used effectively in any type of environment , while evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners are most effective in hot

- dry climate regions ( i.e. , the southwestern United States ).

2.1.2 Variable Refrigerant Flow Commercial Package Air Conditio ning and Heating Equipment

Variable refrigerant flow systems are a subset of commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment that is newly defined in ASHRAE 90.1

- 2010. VRF systems are most commonly used i n hotels, schools, and office buildings where different zones have different heating and cooling load requirements depending on occupancy and time of day. VRF systems typically have one outdoor condensing unit that is connected to multiple indoor evaporator coils, as opposed to the single indoo r evaporator coil typically found in conventional air conditioners and heat pumps. Each evaporator coil in a VRF system can be individually controlled, and VRF systems are capable of monitoring and adjusting the refrigerant flow to each evaporator to meet the requirements of heating and cooling loads in specific zones. Some VRF heat pumps have a heat recovery option, which allows the system to move heat between zones within a building via a third refrigerant line that connects indoor evaporator coils. The h eat recovery feature allows a zone requiring heat to be warmed using the heat extracted from a zone requiring cooling, and vice versa. However, if all zones need to be heated at the same time, then the heat would need to be provided by other means ( e.g. th e reverse refrigeration cycle).

Water

- source VRF systems utilize a condensing unit that transfers heat to or from circulating water depending on whether the system is in cooling or heating mode. These systems allow the condensing unit of the system to be placed indoors, such as in a mechanical closet or a basement. Having the condensing unit indoors decreases the amount of refrigerant piping to the individual evaporator coils, which is especially useful for equipment installed in high rise office building s.
Neither EPCA nor DOE’s regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) define variable refrigerant flow systems. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 defines a variable refrigerant flow system as “an engineered direct expansion (DX) multi

- split system incorp orating at least one variable capacity compressor distributing refrigerant through a piping network to multiple indoor fan coil units each capable of individual zone temperature control, through integral zone temperature control devices and common communic ations network. Variable refrigerant flow utilizes three or more steps of control on common, interconnecting piping .” AHRI Standard 1230

- 2010 , the ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 test procedure for this equipment, uses the term

“ variable refrigerant flow multi

- s plit system ” and defines it as “a split system air

- conditioner or2

- 3 heat pump incorporating a single refrigerant circuit, with one or more outdoor units, at least one variable speed compressor or an alternative compressor combination for varying the capacity of the system by three or more steps, multiple indoor fan coils units, each of which is individually metered and individually controlled by a proprietary control device and common communications network. The system shall be capable of operating as an air conditioner or a heat pump. Variable refrigerant flow implies three or more steps of control on common, inter

connecting piping.” AHRI Standard 1230 and ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 uses the term

“ multi split ” to distinguish them from “ mini split, ” the indo or units of which can only be controlled by one thermostat. Since DOE believes that it is important to distinguish VRF systems as multi

- split systems , DOE proposed to formulate definitions for this equipment class based on the definitions above . DOE defi nes “variable refrigerant flow multi

- split air conditioner” and “variable refrigerant flow multi

- split heat pump” in s ection V.A of the NOPR. T he definitions DOE proposes clearly delineate VRF air conditioners and heat pumps as a sub

category of commercia l package air conditioning and heating equipment and are structured in such a way to e nsure that there are no overlaps with any other covered equipment class. The definition also incorporates all of the unique features of this equipment, such as the indiv idually

controlled indoor units and an integral control device for monitoring the system. There is also a subcategory of VRF heat pumps that have “ heat recovery, ” which DOE also defines in s ection V.A of the NOPR.

2.1.3 Computer Rooms Air Conditioners

“Air c onditioners and condensing units serving computer rooms” is a new equipment class established in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 modified its scope to cover air conditioning equipment used for process cooling and specified the efficien cy metric for this equipment class as sensible coefficient of performance (SCOP) as measured by ASHRAE 127

- 2007, Method of Testing for Rating Computer and Data Processing Room Unitary Air Conditioners

. Because of this expansion of scope, DOE tentatively co ncluded that it has the authority to regulate and set standards for this equipment. Thus, DOE must define computer room air conditioners so that this equipment class would be clearly differentiated from other commercial packaged air conditioners and heat p umps. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 does not contain a definition for “air conditioners and condensing units serving computer rooms,” but does define a “computer room” as “a room whose primary function is to house equipment for the processing and storage of el ectronic data and that had a design electronic data equipment power density exceeding 20 watts/ft 2 of conditioned floor area.” ASHRAE 127

- 2007 defines a “computer and data processing room (CDPR) unitary air conditioner” as a system “consisting of

one or mo re factory

- made assemblies, which include a direct expansion evaporator or chilled

water cooling coil, an air

- moving device, and air

- filtering devices. The air conditioner may include a compressor, condenser, humidifier, or reheating function. Where direct expansion equipment is provided in more than one assembly and the separate are to be used together, the2

- 4 requirements of rating outlined in this standard are based upon the use of matched assemblies. The functions of a CDPR air conditioner, either alone or in combination with a cooling and heating plant, are to provide air filtration, circulation, cooling, reheating, and humidity control

. ” Neither of these definitions gives any unique physical characteristics that could differentiate computer room air condi tioners from other commercial packaged unitary air conditioners.

Computer room air conditioners operate in the same manner as other commercial packaged unitary air conditioners in that they provide space conditioning by means of a direct expansion system . However, c ooling computer rooms, server rooms, and data centers presents unique challenges because these areas contain valuable equipment that are sensitive to small changes in temperature and humidity. Too much humidity can lead to water condensing on electronic components , and too little humidity may cause static discharges. Computer equipment are also constantly producing dynamic, high density heating loads, which means that the air conditioning also would need to be running constantly and needs to be able to cool any “hot spots.” Server rooms and data centers are typically located in the center of buildings away from windows and often have limited floor space, which limits the size and positioning of the air conditioner and causes issues related to re moving the heat from the computer room.

Because of these challenges computer room air conditioners have different design requirements than standard air conditioners, even though they use the same process and components as conventional air conditioners ( i. e. , a refrigeration cycle with a compressor, condensing coil, expansion valve, and evaporator coil). Computer room air conditioners have to maintain the temperature in a narrow range and maintain a specific relative humidity (usually between 40 and 55 perc ent) ; so in addition to cooling, these equipment have to be capable of both humidifying and dehumidifying the air. These air conditioners are often called “precision air conditioners” because of this control requirement. These units can be installed in va rious configurations, including floor mounted, ceiling mounted, or portable units for moving around the room. The condensing units can be cooled by air, wate r, or a glycol

- water mixture. However, even though humidity control is an essential feature for con ditioning computer rooms, humidity control is typically an optional feature for computer room air conditioners since most of the system is custom built for a specific application.

Because DOE is not aware of any physical features unique to computer room a ir conditioners and because computer room air conditioners are typically described by their application, DOE is proposing a definition for computer room air conditioners based on how the equipment is marketed for use and which test standard is used to rate its performance. For the NOPR DOE has proposed to define “computer room air conditioner” as “ a unit of commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment that is advertised, marketed, and/or sold specifically for use in computer rooms, data proces sing rooms, or other precision cooling applications, and is rated for performance using ASHRAE Standard 127, (incorporated by2

- 5 reference, see §431.95). Such equipment may not be marketed or advertised as equipment for any other space conditioning applicatio ns, and may not be rated for performance using AHRI Standard 210/240 or AHRI Standard 340/360 .” DOE used this definition when compiling its database of computer room air conditioners described in section 2.2 of this chapter.

2.1.4 Federal Energy Conservation St andards

On January 12, 2001, DOE published in the Federal Register a final rule promulgating the current standards for 5 equipment classes of small ( i.e. , cooling capacity <135,000 Btu/h) and large ( i.e. , cooling capacity ≥135,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners. 66 FR 3336. This final rul e adopted the efficiency levels set by ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 1999. On July 22 , 2009, DOE published in the Federal Registe r a final rule setting the standards for very large water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled equipment with a cooling capacity ≥240,000 and <760,000 Btu/h. 74 FR 36312. In the July 2009 final rule, DOE adopted the efficiency levels for the se products as speci fied in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2007.

As noted previously, variable refrigerant flow systems are new classes of equipment in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010. However, these equipment classes are currently covered under the more broad Federal equipment classes of commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency levels for all classes of VRF systems equal to the existing F ederal energy conservation standards for commercial package air conditioning and heating e quipment, except for the equipment class of water

- source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity <17,000 Btu/h. Therefore, with the exception of water

- source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity <17,000 Btu/h, DOE was not required to perform an analysis o f those equipment classes. In addition , ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 includes efficiency levels for water

- source VRF heat pumps with cooling capacity ≥135,000 Btu/h, which are not currently regulated by F ederal energy conservation standards. The current F ederal energy conservation standard for wa ter

- source heat pumps with a cooling capacity <135,000 Btu/h was set by the January 2001 final rule, which adopted the ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 1999 levels. 66 FR 3336. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) set the current F ederal standard for the other c lasses of commercial package air conditioners and heating equipment with the exception of air

- cooled heat pumps with a cooling capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h, which were included in EISA 2007.

Table 2.1.1 shows the current Federal energy conservation levels for equipment classes where ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 increased the efficiency levels in comparison to the Federal levels.2

- 6 Table 2.1

. 1 Current Federal Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Package Air Conditioning and Heating Equipment Classes with Increased or New Efficiency Levels in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 Equipment Type Cooling Capacity Subcategory Federal Standard Small Commercial Package Air Con ditioning Equipment, Water

- cooled and Evaporatively

- cooled ≥65,000 Btu/h and <135,000 Btu/h Electric Resistance or no heating 11.5 EER

All other 11.3 EER
Large Commercial Package Air Conditioning and Heating Equipment, Water

- cooled and Evaporatively

- cooled ≥135,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h Electric Resistance or no heating 11.0 EER

All other 11.0 EER

Very Large Commercial Package Air Conditioning and Heating Equipment, Water

- cooled and Evaporatively

- cooled ≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h Elect ric Resistance or no heating 11.0 EER

All other 10.8 EER

Small Commercial Package Air Conditioning and Heating Equipment, Water

- source * <17,000 Btu/h HP 11.2 EER 4.2 COP

Large Commercial Package Air Conditioning and Heating Equipment, Water

- source* >1 35,000 Btu/h HP None

Air

- c ooled Computer Room Air Conditioners <65,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None ≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None

Water

- c ooled Computer Room Air Conditioners <65,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h Downfl ow None Upflow None ≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None

Water

- c ooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Fluid Economizer <65,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upfl ow None ≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None

Glycol

- c ooled Computer Room Air Conditioners <65,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None ≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None Glycol

- c ooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Fluid Economizer <65,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None2

- 7 ≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h Downflow None Upflow None * This equipment class includes VRF systems , for which ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 updated its standard levels

.

2.1.5 ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 Equipment Classes and Efficiency Levels

The previous version of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 (ASHRAE S tandard 90.1

- 2007) specified the efficiency levels for water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners as a single equipment class including both types of equipment. In ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010, ASHRAE specified different efficiency levels for wate r

- cooled air conditioners and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners, while retaining the same cooling capacity ranges: < 65,000 Btu/h, ≥65,000 and <135,000 Btu /h , ≥135,000 and <240,000 Btu/h, and ≥240,000 and <760,000 Btu/h

. a ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 furth er divides these products based on whether they have electric resistance / no heating or any other kind of heating.

ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 also created new equipment classes for VRF systems. ASHRAE divides air

- cooled VRF systems into 4 size categories: <65,000 Btu/h, ≥65,000 and <135,000 Btu/h, ≥135,000 and <240,000 Btu/h, and ≥240,000 and < 760,000 Btu/h. a ASHRAE 90.1

- 2010 also divides water

- source VRF systems into 3 size categories, <65,000 Btu/h, ≥65,000 and <135,000 Btu/h, and ≥135,000 and <760,000 Btu/h. a For both air

- cooled and water

- source VRF systems, ASHRAE also further divides th ose equipment classes with a cooling capacity greater than 65,000 Btu/h ba sed on whether or not a heat recovery system is present. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 raised the efficiency level above the Federal standard for VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity < 17,000 Btu/h and VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity ≥ 135,000 Btu/h (fo r which no Federal standard exists).

ASHRAE also created new equipment classes for air conditioners and condensing units serving computer rooms. ASHRAE first divides air conditioners and condensing units serving computer rooms into 5 classes depending on cooling mechanism: air

- c ooled, water

- cooled,
water

- cooled with a fluid economizer, glycol

- cooled (rated at 40% propylene glycol), and glycol

cooled with a fluid economizer. ASHRAE further divides these classes into 3 size categories (<65,000 Btu/h, ≥65,000 and <240,000 Btu/h, an d ≥240,000 Btu/h) and orientation (upflow and downflow) to make up a total of 30 unique efficiency levels for this equipment class.

Table 2.1

. 2 below shows the ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 efficiency level for the updated equipmen t classes along with the current ly applicable Federal minimum efficiency standards for comparison.

a ASHRAE Standard 90.1 does not specify an upper limit on the cooling capacity for the largest capacity equipment class (i.e., ≥240,000 Btu/h). However, EPCA limits the size of very large commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment to cooling capacities below 760,000 Btu/h.2

- 8 Table 2.1

. 2 Equipment Classes With Updated Efficiency Levels in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010

ASHRAE Equipment Typ e Cooling Capacity Subcategories ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 Federal Minimum Energy Conservation

Standards

Water

- cooled Air Conditioner ≥65,000 and <135,000Btu/h Electric Resistance or No Heating Split System and Single

Package 12.1 EER (as of 6/1/11) 11.5 EER

All Others Split System and Single

Package 11.9 EER (as of 6/1/11) 11.3 EER

≥135,000 and <240,000Btu/h Electric Resistance or No Heating Split System and Single

Package 12.5 EER (as of 6/1/11) 11.0 EER
All Others Split System and Single

Package 12.3 EER (as of 6/1/11)

≥240,000 and <760,000Btu/h Electric Resistance or No Heating Split System and Single

Package 12.4 EER ( as of 6/1/11) 11.0 EER

All Others Split System and Single

Package 12.2 EER (as of 6/1/11) 10.8 EER

Evaporatively

- cooled Air Conditioner ≥65,000 and <135,000Btu/h Electric Resistance or No Heating Split System and Single

Package 12.1 EER (as of 6/1/1 1) 11.5 EER

All Others Split System and Single

Package 11.9 EER (as of 6/1/11) 11.3 EER

≥135,000 and <240,000Btu/h Electric Resistance or No Heating Split System and Single

Package 12.0 EER (as of 6/1/11) 11.0 EER
All Others Split System and Sing le

Package 11.8 EER (as of 6/1/11)

≥240,000 and <760,000Btu/h Electric Resistance or No Heating Split System and Single

Package 11.9 EER (as of 6/1/11) 11.0 EER

All Others Split System and Single

Package 12.2 EER * (as of 6/1/11) 10.8 EER2

- 9 ASHRAE Equipment Typ e Cooling Capacity Subcategories ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 Federal Minimum Energy Conservation

Standards

Variable Refrigerant Flow, Water

- source <17,000 Btu/h All heating types Multi

- split system 12.0 EER 4.2 COP 11.2 EER 4.2 COP Multi

- split system with Heat Recovery 11.8 EER 4.2 COP 11.2 EER 4.2 COP

≥135,000 Btu/h All heating types Multi

- split system 10.0 EER 3.9 COP
None Multi

- split system with Heat Recovery 9.8 EER 3.9 COP

Air Conditioners Serving Computer Rooms, Air

- c ooled <65,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.20 SCOP

None Upflow 2.09 SCOP

≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h - Downflow 2.10 SCOP
Upflow 1.99 SCOP

≥240,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 1.90 SCOP
Upflow 1.79 SCOP

Air Conditioners Serving Computer Rooms, Water

- c ooled <65,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.60 SCOP

None Upflow 2.49 SCOP
≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h - Downflow 2.50 SCOP
Upflow 2.39 SCOP

≥240,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.40 SCOP
Upflow 2.29 SCOP

Air Conditioners Serving Computer Rooms, Water

- c ooled with F luid E conomizer <65,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.55 SCOP

None Upflow 2.44 SCOP

≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h - Downflo w 2.45 SCOP

Upflow 2.34 SCOP

≥240,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.35 SCOP
Upflow 2.24 SCOP2

- 1 0 ASHRAE Equipment Typ e Cooling Capacity Subcategories ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 Federal Minimum Energy Conservation

Standards

Air Conditioners Serving Computer Rooms, G lycol

- cooled <65,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.50 SCOP

None Upflow 2.39 SCOP
≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h - Downf low 2.15 SCOP
Upflow 2.04 SCOP

≥240,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.10 SCOP
Upflow 1.99 SCOP

Air Conditioners Serving Computer Rooms, G lycol

- cooled with F luid E conomizer <65,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.45 SCOP

None Upflow 2.34 SCOP
≥65,000 Btu/h

an d <240,000 Btu/h - Downflow 2.10 SCOP
Upflow 1.99 SCOP

≥240,000 Btu/h

- Downflow 2.05 SCOP
Upflow 1.94 SCOP *Given the historical approach of the ASHRAE committee to setting efficiency levels with for commercial air conditioning and heating equipment, this efficiency level appears to be a mistake in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010. DOE believes the intended level is 11.7 EER, and an addendum to lower the value to 11.7 EER is currently being considered by ASHRAE. Accordingly, DOE considered the valu e 11.7 EER as the ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 efficiency level in its potential energy savings analysis.

ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 raised the efficiency level in comparison to the current Federal minimum ene rgy conservation standards for six water

- cooled air conditioner equipment classes, six evaporatively

- cooled air conditioner equipment classes , and one water

- source VRF heat pump equipment classes. In addition, ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 created efficiency levels for one water

- source VRF hea t pump equipme nt class and for thirty classes of air conditioners serving computer rooms that were not previously covered by DOE’s regulations. DOE assessed the current market and performed a potential energy savings analysis for each equipment class where DOE found mod els on the market

. The market assessment is described in the sections immediately below

.

2.2 MARKET ASSESSMENT

The following market assessment identifies the manufacturer trade associations and domestic and international manufacturers of commercial water

- c ooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners
, VRF systems, and computer room air conditioners

. The market assessment also2

- 11 summarizes the relevant market performance data for each equipment class where such data was available

.

2.2.1 Trade Associations

DOE researched various trade groups who represent manufacturers, distributors, and installers of the various types of equipment being analyzed this rulemaking. The Air

Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) is one of the largest trade associ ations for manufacturers of space heating and cooling equipment , representing over 90% of the residential and commercial air

- conditioning, space

- heating, water

- heating, and commercial refrigeration equipment manufactured in the US

. 1 AHRI also develops and publishes test procedures standards for residential and commercial heating, ventilation, and air conditioning ( HVAC ) equipment and coordinates with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to help harmonize the US standards with internation al standards, if feasible. AHRI also maintains the AHRI Directory of Certified Product Performance that lists all the products and equipment that have been certified by AHRI. Water

- cooled air conditioners can be found in the commercial un itary large equipm ent directory, and VRF systems can be found in the VRF multi

split air conditioning and heat pump equipment directory. There are no evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners or computer room air conditioners listed in the AHRI directory.

Heating, Airconditi oning & Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI) is a trade association that represents over 450 wholesale heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration ( HVACR ) companies plus over 300 manufacturing associates and nearly 140 manufacturi ng representatives. HARDI estimates that 80% of the revenue of HVACR systems goes through its members

. 2

Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA) is another trade association whose members include over 4,000 contractors and 60,000 professionals. AC CA provides contractors technical, legal, and market resources, helping to promote good practices and to keep buildings safe, clean, and affordable

. 3

2.2.2 Manufacturers

DOE reviewed the efficiency data for water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioner s currently on the market by examining the AHRI D irectory of Certified Product Performance 4 and the C alifornia E nergy C ommission (CEC) Appliance Efficiency Database. 5 To supplement the data in the AHRI and CEC databases , DOE gathered additional information from the websites of individual manufacturers of that equipment. For VRF systems DOE used the AHRI D irectory of Certified Product Performance for VRF systems and gathered data from2

- 12 manufacturers’ websites for this equipment. DOE gathered data on computer room air conditioners from the CEC database and from manufacturer s ’ websites.

DOE identified eight manufacturers of water

- cooled air conditioners, three manufacturers of evapora tively

- cooled air conditioners
, three manufactures of water

- source variable re frigerant flow heat pumps , and five manufacturers of computer room air conditioners . The manufacturers for each equipment class are listed in Table 2.2

. 1

.

Table 2.2

. 1 Manufacturers o f the Commercial Equipment Included in this Rulemaking Water

- Cooled Air Conditioner Manufacturers Evaporatively

- C ooled Air Conditioner Manufacturers Water

- S ource Variable Refrigerant Flow System Manufacturers Computer Room Air Conditioners

Aaon, Inc. Aaon , Inc. Daikin American Power Conversion Allied Thermal Systems Trane Inc. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. CompuAire
Carrier Corp. York International Corp. Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. Data Aire, Inc.

Lennox International Liebert Engineered Air Stulz Air Technology Systems Thermoplus Air, Inc. Trane Inc. York International Corp.

2.2.3 Market Performance Data

For each equipment class analyzed, DOE began by gathering market data to characterize the efficiency and performance of mode ls currently on the market. As noted earlier, DOE gathered information from the AHRI D irectory of Certified Product P erformance, as well as the CEC A ppliance Efficiency D atabase. DOE also examined individual manufacturer ’s websites and product literature t o compile a complete database of models for each equipment class.

For the analysis, DOE only examined the equipment classes for which ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 increased its efficiency levels: water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioner equipmen t classe s with cooling capacit ies greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h
, water

- source VRF heat pum ps with a cooling capacity <17,000 Btu/h, water

- source VRF systems with a cooling capacity ≥135,000 Btu/h, and computer room air conditioners.

. Using the AHRI and CEC directories as a starting point and augmenting the data with information from manufact urer websites, DOE compiled a database of water

- cooled air conditioner models with efficiency data available and separated them into the appropriate equipment classes based on cooling capacity: small ( i.e. , <135,000 Btu/h), large ( i.e. , ≥135,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h ), and very large ( i.e. , ≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h). DOE found no evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners i n the AHRI and CEC d irector ies but found a few2

- 13 evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners from manufacturers’ websites. D OE compiled a database of e vaporatively

- cooled air conditioner models with efficiency data available and found no models that fall into the small and large equipment classes. Accordingly, all evaporatively

cooled models identified were in the very large equipment class

. Therefore, DOE did not perform a potential energy savings analysis for the NODA for small and large evaporatively

cooled air conditioners and is not analyzing them as part of this NOPR analysis; however , DOE did analyze small (≥65,000), large, and very large water

- cooled air conditioners and very large evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners as part of the potential energy savings analysis for the NODA and for this NOPR

.
For the NODA, DOE used manufacturers’ websites to co mpile a database of water

source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity < 17,000 Btu/h and water

- source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity ≥ 135,000 Btu/h. However, after the NODA was published, AHRI released a VRF multi

- split air conditioning and heat p ump database as part of their Directory of Certified Product Performance. Thus, for the NOPR market assessment DOE used the AHRI database and supplemented that database with models found from manufacturer’s websites that were not in the AHRI database. DOE found no water

- source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity < 17,000 Btu/h on the market
, but it did find water

- source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity ≥ 135,000 Btu/h. Therefore, DOE did not perform a potential energy savings analysis for the NODA for water

- source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity < 17,000 Btu/h and did not analyze them for this NOPR (as explained in the NOPR), but it did perform a po tential energy savings analysis for water

- source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity ≥ 135,000 Btu/h.

Lastly, f or computer room air conditioners , DOE compiled a database of available models using information from the CEC directory and from manufacturers ’ websites. AHRI does not have a database for computer room air conditioners in their Directory of Certified Product Performance. DOE then divided the computer roo m air conditioner models into 30 equipment classes, by net sensible cooling capacity (<65,00 0 Btu/h, ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h, and ≥240,000 Btu/h)
, by cooling type (air

- cooled, water

- cooled, water

- cooled with a fluid economizer, glycol

- cooled, and glycol

- cooled with a fluid economizer) , and by orientation ( i.e. , whether it is upflow or do wnflow)

. DOE used th is database as the starting point for its analysis of computer room air conditioners.

2.2.3.1 Water

- Cooled Air Conditioners

Small Water

- cooled Air Conditioners

. Small water

- cooled air conditioners have a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 135,000 Btu/h and have their condensing coil completely submerged in water. Small water

- cooled air conditioners are part of the water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners equipment class, whose Federal

en ergy conservation standard is 11.5 EER for systems with electric resistance or no heating and2

- 14 11.3 EER for systems that use any other type of heating (66 FR 3336; 10 CFR 431.97). ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 changes the efficiency rating to 12.1 for systems w ith electric resistance or no heating and 11.9 for systems that use any other type of heating. DOE analyzed the distribution of energy efficiency ratios (EERs) for these products as well as the minimum, maximum, and average cooling input capacities and EER values. The average EER value for this equipment class is 13.9. Of the models identified by DOE, two (13 percent of the total models) have EERs rated below the ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 levels.

Figure 2.2

. 1 EER Histogram of Small Water

- cooled Air Conditioners

Large Water

- cooled Air Conditioners

. Large water

- cooled air conditioners have a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 135,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h and have their condensing coil co mpletely submerged in water. Large water

- cooled air conditioners are part of the water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners equipment class, whose Federal energy conservation standard is 11.0 EER regardless of what kind of heating is used (66 F R 3336; 10 CFR 431.97 ). ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 changes the efficiency rating to 12.5 for systems with electric resistance or no heating and 12.3 for systems that use any other type of heating. DOE analyzed the distribution of efficiencies for these prod ucts. The average EER for these units was 13.1. DOE identified 6 models (43 percent of the total models in this equipment class) that would fall below the ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 levels for this equipment class. 0 1 2 3 4Number of Models

EER2

- 15 Figure 2.2

. 2 EER Histogram of Larg e Water

- c ooled Air Conditioners

Very Large Water

- cooled Air Conditioners

. Very large water

- cooled air conditioners have a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h
, and h ave their condensing coil completely submerged in water. Very large water

- cooled air conditioners are part of the water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners equipment class, whose Federal energy conservation standard is 11.0 EER for units with electric resistance or no heating and 10.8 for units with all other kinds of heating (74 FR 36312 ; 10 CFR 431.97 ). ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 changes the efficiency rating to 12.5 for systems with electric resistance or no heating and 12.3 for systems that use any other type of heating. DOE analyzed the distribution of efficiencies for these products. The average EER rating for these units is 13.0. DOE identified 12 models (34 percent of the total models identified) that would fall below the ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 efficiency level for this equipment class.

Figure 2.2

. 3 EER Histogram of Very Large Water

- c ooled Air Conditioners 0 1 2 3 4Number of Models

EER

0 1 2 3 4 5Number of Models

EER2

- 16 2.2.3.2 Evaporatively

- Cooled Air Conditioners

Small Evaporatively

- cooled Air C onditione rs . Small evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners have a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 135,000 Btu/h. Small evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners are covered as part of the water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air cond itioners equipment class, whose Federal energy conservation standard is 11.5 EER for systems with electric resistance or no heating and 11.3 EER for systems that use any other type of hea ting (66 FR 3336; 10 CFR 431.97 ). ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 changes t he efficiency rating to 12.1 EER for systems with electric resistance or no heating and 11.9 EER for systems that use any other type of heating. DOE surveyed the AHRI database and manufacturers’ websites to find small evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners with cooling capacities greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 135,000 Btu/h and did not find any on the market.

Large Evaporatively

- cooled Air Conditioners

. Large evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners have a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 135,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h. Large evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners are covered as part of the water

cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners equipment class, whose Federal energy conservation standard is 11.0 EER regard less of what type of heating is used (66 FR 3336; 10 CFR 431.97 ). ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 changes the efficiency rating to 12.0 EER for systems with electric resistance or no heating and 11.8 EER for systems that use any other type of heating. DOE survey ed the AHRI database and manufacturers’ websites to find large evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners with cooling capacities greater than or equal to 135,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h and did not find any on the market.

Very Large Evaporatively

- co oled Air C onditioners

. Very large evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners have an input capacity greater than or equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h. Very l arge evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners are covered as part of the water

- cooled and evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners equipment class, whose Federal energy conservation standard is 11.0 EER for systems with electric resistance or no heating and 10.8 EER for systems that use any other type of heat ing (74 FR 36312; 10 CFR 431.97 ). ASHRA E Standard 90.1

- 2010 changes the efficiency rating to 12.0 EER for systems with electric resistance or no heating and 11.8 EER for systems that use any other type of heating. During the market research, DOE identified several models from manufacturers that would be classified as very large evaporatively

- cooled air conditioners. However, the efficiency rating for these models was not readily available, and DOE was unable to obtain it. For the energy use analysis, DOE used the same efficiency distribution as the air

- cooled equipment class. For more detail on the energy use analysis see chapter 4

.2

- 17 2.2.3.3 Variable Refrigerant Flow Water

- source Heat Pumps

Water

- source VRF Heat Pumps with a Cooling Capacity less than 17,000 Btu/h

. Water

- source VRF h eat p umps with a c o oling c apacity less than 17,000 Btu/h are covered as part of the small commercial package air conditioning and heating equipment class , which has a Federal energy conservation standard of 11.2 EER and 4.2 COP. ASHRAE Stan dard 90.1

- 2010 changed the efficien cy rating for water

- source VRF systems with a cooling capacity less than 17,000 Btu/h to 12.0 EER and 4.2 COP for those systems with no heat recovery technology and to 11.8 EER and 4.2 COP for those systems with heat recovery technology. DOE surveyed the A HRI database and VRF manufacturer s’ websites to find VRF water

- source heat pumps with cooling capacities below 17,000 Btu/h and did not find any on the market.

Water

- source VRF Heat Pumps with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 135,000 Btu/h

. Wat er

- source VRF h eat p umps with a c ooling c apacity g reater than or e qual to 135,000 Btu/h currently do not have a Federal energy conservation standard. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set new efficiency level s for those systems with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 135,000 Btu/h at 10.0 EER and 3.9 COP for systems without heat recovery devices and 9.8 EER and 3.9 COP for systems with heat recovery devices. From the AHRI directory and manufacturers’ websites , DOE found 106 models with no heat recovery opt ion and 58 models with a heat recovery add

- on for a total of 164 unique units. The AHRI directory gave EER information as tested by AHRI 1230

- 2010 : Performance Rating of Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) Multi

- Split Air

- Conditioning and Heat Pump Equipment
, which is the test procedure as listed in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 for th is equipment

. However, manufacturers’ websites did not release any EER data as tested by AHRI 1230

- 2010, so DOE used only the models in the AHRI directory for EER information (a tota l of 98 units). For water

- source VRF heat pumps with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 135,000 Btu/h, the average EER is 11.3 for units without a heat recovery system and 11.4 for units with a heat recovery system. A histogram of EER for this equ ipment class is shown in Figure 2

. 4 and Figure 2

. 5

.2

- 18 Figure 2.2

. 4 Histogram of Water

- Source VRF Systems ( ≥ 135,000 Btu/h) with No Heat Recovery

Figur e 2.2

. 5 Histogram of Water

- Source VRF S ystems (≥135,000 Btu/h) with Heat Recovery 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1010.310.510.710.911.111.311.511.711.912.112.312.512.712.913.113.313.513.713.914.114.314.5Number of Models

EER

0 0.5

1 1.5

2 2.5

3 3.5

4 4.510.310.510.710.911.111.311.511.711.912.112.312.512.712.913.113.313.513.713.914.114.314.5Number of Models

EER2

- 19 2.2.3.4 Computer Room Air Conditioners

Prior to ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010, computer room air conditioners were not considered covered equipment under EPCA , so there are currently no Federal energy conservation standard s for these equipment. However, as explained in the NODA, ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 expanded the scope of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 to include these products, which DOE interpreted as also expanding its authority under EPCA. (See section II.C of the notice of data availability ( NODA ). b ) As a result of the lack of existing Federal standards (and as a result, lack of reporting requirements)
, manufacturers are not required to report the efficiency of their equipment ; and several manufacturers do not report efficiency information. However, the CEC regulates the minimum efficiency of computer room air conditioners, requiring units installed in the state of California to be tes ted using ASHRAE 127

- 2001 and meet a minimum EER rating as listed in Table 2.2

. 2

.

Table 2.2

. 2 CEC Computer Room Air Conditioners Minimum Efficiency Levels CEC Equipme nt Type Cooling Capacity (Btu/h) Minimum Efficiency Level (ASHRAE 127

- 2001 EER) Air

- cooled computer room air conditioners < 65,000 11.0 EER ≥ 65,000 and < 135,000 10.4 EER ≥ 135,000 and < 240,000 10.2 EER Water

- cooled, Glycol

- cooled, and Evaporativel y

- cooled Computer Air Conditioners < 65,000 11.1 EER ≥ 65,000 and < 135,000 10.5 EER ≥ 135,000 and < 240,000 10.0 EER

As noted previously, the CEC maintains a directory of “computer room air conditioners” in its appliance efficiency database. DOE se arched the CEC database for computer room air conditioners and supplemented that data with information from literature found on manufacturer websites. In total, DOE found 1364 models computer room air conditioners
, many of which are variations of the same base model . For example, a given model could have the same basic design and construction, but with multiple option al features, such as optional upflow or downflow configuration
, and the option of adding a fluid economizer; thus from this single model
, 4 d ifferent variations are possible , each variation with its own efficiency characteristics and each falling into a separate equipment class

. From the 5 manufacturers identified, DOE found 22 model lines of computer room air conditioners, consisting of 120 ba se models and 1244 models that were optional variations of those models to make up the 1364 models in its database. DOE presents the models included in its database broken up by equipment class in Table 2

. 5

.

b On May 5, 2011, DOE published a Notice of Data Availability and request for public comment in the Fe deral Register as a preliminary step pursuant to EPCA’s requirements for DOE to consider amended energy conservation standards for certain commercial equipment covered by ASHRAE Standard 90.1. 76 FR 25622.2

- 20 Table 2.2

. 3 Computer Room Air Conditioner Database Breakdown Equipment Class Size Category Number of Upflow Units Number of Downflow Units

Air

- Cooled <65,000 Btu/h 63 140 ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h 99 126 >240,000 Btu/h 13 11

Water

- Cooled <65,000 Btu/h 31 68 ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h 56 71 >240,000 Btu/h 12 10
Water

- Cooled with a

Fluid Economizer <65,000 Btu/h 17 44 ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h 47 58 >240,000 Btu/h 4 4
Glycol Cooled <65,000 Btu/h 28 63 ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h 57 71 >240,000 Btu/h 10 8 Glycol Cooled with a

Fluid Economizer <65,000 Btu/h 32 60 ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h 66 79 >240,000 Btu/h 9 7

DOE found effi ci ency information for three of the five computer ro om air conditioner manufacturers. The CEC database included EER information for two manufacturers , and one manufacturer included EER information in its product literature. In all cases the EER information was measured according to the procedures in ASHRAE 127

- 2001. However, DOE notes that ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 adopts an updated version of ASHRAE Standard 127 ( i.e. , ASHRAE Standard 127

- 2007), which changes the efficiency metric from EER to SCOP. In addition, the standard rating condition s were changed be tween the 2001 and 2007 editions of the ASHRAE 127 test procedure, which adds to the difficult y of obtain ing information about product efficiency as rated using the new SCOP rating metric. A footnote to Table D1 in Appendi x D o f ASHRAE 127

- 2007 contains a “ rule

- of

- thumb ” formula listed in equation 1 below that approximates the SCOP value using the old EER rating.

E q . 2. 1

DOE found EER information for 208 models in its database (15.2% of the database) and used this rule of thumb conversion to convert this EER data into SCOP data. The rule of thumb converts EER into SCOP by multiplying the EER at the old rating condition (71.6°F dry

- bulb (DB) return temperature and 50% relative humid it y (RH)) with the sensible heat ratio c (SHR) at

c Sensible heat ratio (SHR) is the ratio of a uni t’s sensible cooling capacity divided by the total ( i.e. , sensible and latent) cooling capacity.2

- 21 the new rating condit ion (75°F DB return temperature and 45% RH) and dividing by 3.5. For the units in the CEC database, DOE found the SHR at the new rating condition in the manufacturer’s product literature. For units where DOE obtained EER data from manufacturer literature
, SHR information was only available at the old rating condition. To approximate the SHR at the new rating condition, DOE increased the sensible cooling capacity at the old rating condition by 8.9 % (the average percent increase in sensible cooling capacity from the old rating condition to the new rating condition for the rest of the models in the database) and increased the total cooling capacity at the old rating condition by 3.3 % (the average percent increase in total cooling capacity from the old rating c ondition to the new rating condition for the rest of the models in the database). DOE used these new sensible and total cooling capacities to estimate the SHR at the new rating condition for these units. Thus, DOE was able to calculate estimated SCOP value s for all of the units for which it had EER information.

DOE found that for units available optionally in downflow and upflow orientation only a single EER value was specified and the orientation in which the value was obtained was not specified

. DOE ass umed that the reported EER was tested in the downflow orientation unless the unit was only available in the upflow orientation because t he EER value as tested in the downflow configuration would be higher than if the same unit was tested in the upflow conf iguration . If a unit was available in both downflow and upflow orientation s , DOE assumed that the upflow model would have a lower EER and SCOP due to the effects of additional static pressure that the blower must overcome. In order to calculate the upflow SCOP, DOE reduced the corresponding downflow model’s SCOP by 0.11, which is the reduction in ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 between the downflow and upflow equipment classes

. The average SCOP for each equipment class is shown below in Table 2.2

. 4

. For some equipment classes, DOE could not find any efficiency information from the CEC database or manufacturers’ websites. Those equipment classes are shown as a blank in Table 2.2

. 4

.

Table 2.2

. 4 Average SCOP for Computer Room Air Conditioners Equipment Class Size Category Average Upflow SCOP Average Downflow SCOP

Air

- Cooled <65,000 Btu/h 2.49 2.61 ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h 2.64 2.64 >240,000 Btu/h

- 2.25

Water

- Cooled <65,000 Btu/h 2.76 2.90 ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h 2.76 2.78 >240,000 Btu/h

- 2.45
Water

- Cooled with a

Fluid Economizer <65,000 Btu/h

- - ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h

- - >240,000 Btu/h

- - Glycol C ooled <65,000 Btu/h 2.66 2.71 ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h

- 2.62 >240,000 Btu/h

- 2.49 Glycol Cooled with a <65,000 Btu/h

- 2.432

- 22 Fluid Economizer ≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h

- 2.48 >240,000 Btu/h

- 2.38 The following sections report for each equipment class the total number of models that DOE found on the market , the number of models for which DOE was able to obtain efficiency information, and information about the performance characteristics (such as the sensible cooling capacity and SC OP) of computer room air conditioners on the market.

Air

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.2 SCOP for a ir

- cooled computer room air conditioners wit h a cooling capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h . DOE found 203 total models in this class and 44 models with efficiency information (18 upflow models and 26 downflow models). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 34,848 Btu/h , and the average SCOP is 2.56

. Figure 2.2

. 6 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities, and Figure 2.2

. 7 shows a histogram of SCOP of the models on the market.

Figure 2.2

. 6 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (<65,000) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 23 Figure 2.2

. 7 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (<65,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

Air

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.1 SCOP for a ir

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a c ooling capacity greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h . DOE found 225 total models in this class and 51 models with efficiency information ( 21 upflow models and 30 downflow models). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 126,671 Btu/h , and the average SCOP is 2.64

. Figure 2.2

. 8 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities, and Figure 2.2

. 9 shows a histogram of SC OP of the models on the market. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Number of Models

SCOP2

- 24 Figure 2.2

. 8 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Figure 2.2

. 9 Air

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

Air

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 1.9 SCOP for a ir

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h . DOE found 24 total models in this class and 1 model with efficiency information ( only a downflow model with a 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Number of Models

SCOP2

- 25 2.25 SCOP ). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 286,015 Btu/h. Figure 2.2

. 10 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities

.

Figure 2.2

. 10 Air

- Cooled Co mputer R oom Air C onditioners ( ≥ 240,000 Btu/h and < 760,000 Btu/h ) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Water

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.6 SCOP for water

cooled computer room air conditioners with a cooling capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h . DOE found 99 total models in this class and 39 models with efficiency information ( 14 upflow models and 25 downflow models). The average sensible cooling capac ity for this class is 36,071 Btu/h
, and the average SCOP is 2.85

. Figure 2.2

. 11 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities, and Figure 2.2

. 12 shows a histogram of SCOP of the models on the marke t. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 26 Figure 2.2

. 11 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Figure 2.2

. 12 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

Water

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.5 SCOP for water

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h . DOE found 127 total models in this class and 50 models with efficiency information ( 20 upflow models and 30 downflow models). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 134,398 Btu/h , and the 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Number of Models

SCOP2

- 27 average SCOP is 2.77

. Figure 2.2

. 13 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities, and Figure 2.2

. 14 shows a histogram of SCOP of the models on the market.

Figure 2.2

. 13 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Figure 2 .2

. 14 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

Water

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760, 000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.4 SCOP for water

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a cooling 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Number of Models

SCOP2

- 28 capacity greater than or equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h . DOE found 22 total models in this class an d 1 model with efficiency information ( only a downflow model with a 2.45 SCOP ). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 292,245 Btu/h. Figure 2.2

. 15 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities

.

Figure 2.2

. 15 Water

- Cooled Co mputer Room Air Conditioner (≥240,000 Btu/h and <760,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Water

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Fluid Economizer with a Cooling Cap acity less than 65,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level
at 2.55 SCOP for w ater

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a fluid economizer with a cooling capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h . DOE found 61 total models in this class an d no models with efficiency information. The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 37,301 Btu/h. Figure 2.2

. 16 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities.

Figure 2.2

. 16 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) With a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 29 Water

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Fluid Economizer with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 65,00 0 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.45 SCOP for w ater

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a fluid economizer with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h . DOE found 105 total models in this class and no models with efficiency information. The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 129,602 Btu/h

. Figure 2.2

. 17 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities.

Figure 2.2

. 17 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥65,000 Btu/h and <240,000 Btu/h) with a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Water

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Fluid Economizer with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.35 SCOP for w ater

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a fluid economizer with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h . DOE found 8 total models in this class and no models with efficiency information. The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 285,063 Btu/h. Figure 2.2

. 18 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capaci ties. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 30 Figure 2.2

. 18 Water

- Cooled Computer Room Air Co nditioner (≥240,000 Btu/h and <76 0,000 Btu/h) with a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Glycol

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.5 SCOP for g lycol

cooled computer room air conditioners with a cooling capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h . DOE found 91 total models in this class and 9 mo dels with efficiency information ( 4 upflow models and 5 downflow models). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 35,425 Btu/h
, and the average SCOP is 2.66

. Figure 2.2

. 19 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities, and Figure 2.2

. 20 shows a histogram of SCOP of the models on the market.

Figure 2.2

. 19 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Ca pacity Histogram 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 31 Figure 2.2

. 20 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) SCOP Histogram

Glycol

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 65,0 00 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.15 SCOP for g lycol

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h . DOE found 128 total models in this class and 5 models with efficiency information ( only downflow models with SCOPs of 2.47, 2.55, 2.65, 2.68, and 2.74 ). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 129,309 Btu/h , and the average SCOP is 2.62

. Figure 2.2

. 21 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities

. 0 0.5

1 1.5

2 2.5Number of Models

SCOP2

- 32 Figure 2.2

. 21 Glycol

- Cooled Co mputer Room Air Conditioner ( ≥ 65,000 and <240 ,000 Btu/h) Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Gly col

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.1 SCOP for g lycol

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a coo ling capacity greater than or equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h . DOE found 18 total models in this class and 1 model with efficiency information ( only a downflow model with a 2.49 SCOP ). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 285,480 Btu/h. Figure 2.2

. 22 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities

. 0 5 10 15 20 25Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 33 Figure 2.2

. 22 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥240,000 and <76 0,000 Btu/h) Sens ible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Glycol

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Fluid Economizer with a Cooling Capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level
at 2.45 SCOP for g lycol

- cooled computer room air condit ioners with a fluid economizer with a cooling capacity less than 65,000 Btu/h . DOE found 92 total models in this class and 1 model with efficiency information ( only a downflow model with a 2.43 SCOP ). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 37,147 Btu/h. Figure 2.2

. 23 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities.

Figure 2.2

. 23 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (<65,000 Btu/h) with a Fluid Economize r Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 34 Glycol

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Fluid Economizer with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.1 SCOP for g lycol

- cooled computer room air conditioners with a fluid economizer with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h and less than 240,000 Btu/h . DOE found 145 total models in this class and 5 models with efficiency information ( onl y downflow models with SCOPs of 2.26, 2.45, 2.53, 2.56, and 2.62 ). The average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 129,380 Btu/h , and the average SCOP is 2.48

. Figure 2.2

. 24 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities.

Figure 2.2

. 24 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥65,000 and <240,000 Btu/h) with a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram

Gl ycol

- cooled Computer Room Air Conditioners with a Fluid Economizer with a Cooling Capacity Greater than or Equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h

. ASHRAE Standard 90.1

- 2010 set the efficiency level at 2.05 SCOP for g lycol

- cooled computer

room a ir conditioners with a fluid economizer with a cooling capacity greater than or equal to 240,000 Btu/h and less than 760,000 Btu/h . DOE found 16 total models in this class and 1 model with efficiency information ( only a downflow model with a 2.38 SCOP ). Th e average sensible cooling capacity for this class is 293,554 Btu/h. Figure 2.2

. 25 shows a histogram of the sensible cooling capacities. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 35 Figure 2.2

. 25 Glycol

- Cooled Computer Room Air Conditioner (≥240,000 and <760,000 Btu/h) With a Fluid Economizer Sensible Cooling Capacity Histogram 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Number of Models

Sensible Cooling Capacity (Btu/h)2

- 36 REFERENCES

1 Air

- Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute Website. About Us. 2011. (Last accessed April 28,2011.) < www.ahrinet.org/about+us.aspx >

2 Heating, Airconditioning & Refrigeration Distributors International Website. About HARDI . 2011. (Last accessed April 28,2011.)

< www.hardinet.org/aws/HARDI/pt/sp/about >

3 Air Conditioning Contractors of America Website. About ACCA. 2011. (Last accessed April 28,2011.) < www.acca.org/ acca >

4 AHRI Directory. Directory of Certified Product Performance . 2011. (Last accessed April 28,2011.) < www.ahridirectory.org >

5 California Energy Commission Website. Appliance Efficiecy Database . 201 1. (Last accessed April 28,2011.) < www.appliances.energy.ca.gov/QuickSearch.aspx >