alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                    BARRISTER GLOBAL SERVICES NETWORKS, INC.

                                 CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

              Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of
Barrister Global Services Network, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

              The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30,
2002 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


<TABLE>
<S>           <C>                                    <C>
Date:                 August 14, 2002                By:      /s/   William O. Bray
              -----------------------                      ----------------------------------------
                                                                     William O. Bray
                                                                      President and
                                                                  Chief Executive Officer



Date:                 August 14, 2002                By:      /s/   Richard P. Beyer
              -----------------------                    ------------------------------------------
                                                                    Richard P. Beyer
                                                              Senior Vice President, Finance
                                                                (Principal Financial Officer)
</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ludvik Rolin, Chief Financial Officer of Victory Eagle Resources Corp., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Victory Eagle Resources Corp.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 15, 2006

/s/ Ludvik Rolin	Ludvik Rolin
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 4.3

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO

                      AMENDED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                                FERRO CORPORATION


         Albert C. Bersticker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mark A.
Cusick, Secretary of Ferro Corporation (the "Corporation"), an Ohio corporation
for profit with its principal location at Cleveland, Ohio, do hereby certify
that a meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation entitling them to vote on
the proposal to amend the Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation,
was duly called and held on April 24, 1998, at which meeting a quorum of such
shareholders was present in person or in proxy, and that by the affirmative vote
of the shareholders entitling them to exercise at least two-thirds of the voting
power of the Corporation on such proposal, the following amendment to the
Amended Articles of Incorporation was adopted:

                           "FOURTH: The number of shares which the Corporation
                  is authorized to have outstanding is 302,000,000 consisting of
                  2,000,000 shares of Serial Preferred Stock without Par Value
                  (hereinafter called "Serial Preferred Stock") and 300,000,000
                  shares of Common Stock of the Par Value of $1.00 each
                  (hereinafter called "Common Stock")."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above-named officers, acting for and on behalf
of the Corporation, have subscribed their names this 17th day of June, 1998.

                                    /s/ Albert C. Bersticker
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Albert C. Bersticker
                                    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer


                                    /s/ Mark A. Cusick
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Mark A. Cusick
                                    Secretary
August 8, 2016

Mr. Jacob Bukowski

SkyCinemaPro

940 N Villa Nueva Drive

Litchfield Park, AZ 85340

Re: FAA–2016–3828

Dear Mr. Bukowski:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00196

- CV

SHAMSUL AHMED APPELLANT

V.

HIGHLAND COOPER OAKS , L.L.C. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant 's “ Motion To Dismiss The Appeal .” It is the

court = s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 14, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of NeoRx Corporation (the Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Jack L. Bowman, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a.               the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

b.              the information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 14, 2003 | By:             | /s/ JACK L.  BOWMAN |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------|---------------------|--------|
|                        | Jack L.  Bowman |

 

----
T.D., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21.1
  List of
    Subsidiaries of Novelis Inc.
  Name of Entity

Jurisdiction of OrganizationNovelis Corporation

Texas, United StatesNovelis de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

MexicoNovelis Finances USA LLC

Delaware, United StatesNovelis PAE Corporation

Delaware, United StatesLogan Aluminum Inc.

Delaware, United StatesNovelis South America Holdings LLC

Delaware, United StatesAluminum Upstream Holdings LLC

Delaware, United StatesMiniMRF LLC

Delaware, United StatesEurofoil Inc. (USA)

New York, United StatesNovelis AG

SwitzerlandNovelis Switzerland S.A.

SwitzerlandNovelis Technology AG

SwitzerlandNovelis Italia SpA

ItalyNovelis Europe Holdings Limited

United KingdomNovelis UK Ltd.

United KingdomNovelis Automotive UK Ltd.

United KingdomNovelis Aluminium Holding Company

IrelandNovelis Benelux NV

BelgiumNovelis Belgique S.A.

BelgiumNovelis Deutschland GmbH

GermanyAluminium Norf GmbH

GermanyNovelis Aluminium Beteiligungs GmbH

GermanyDeutsche Aluminium Verpackung Recycling GmbH

GermanyNovelis Sweden AB

SwedenNovelis Luxembourg S.A.

LuxembourgNovelis Foil France S.A.S.

FranceFrance Aluminium Recyclage S.A.

FranceNovelis Laminés France S.A.S

FranceNovelis PAE S.A.S.

France4260848 Canada Inc.

Canada4260856 Canada Inc.

CanadaNovelis Cast House Technology Ltd.

CanadaNovelis No. 1 Limited Partnership

CanadaNovelis Korea Ltd.

South KoreaAluminium Company of Malaysia Berhad

MalaysiaAl Dotcom Sdn Berhad

MalaysiaAlcom Nikkei Specialty Coatings Sdn Berhad

MalaysiaNovelis do Brasil Ltda.

BrazilConsorcio Candonga (unincorporated joint venture)

BrazilAlbrasilis  Alumínio do Brasil Indústria e
    Comércio Ltda.

BrazilNovelis (India) Infotech Ltd.

India
Order filed May 12, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00431-CV

JASMINE RICKS, Appellant

V.

QUALITY CARRIERS, INC. & CRAIG L. SMITH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-17716

ORDER

On April 28, 2015, appellant filed a motion for an extension of time to file 

her reply brief. Appellant represented that the motion was unopposed. Appellees 

filed a response on April 30, 2015, which stated that, contrary to appellant’s 

representation, appellees do oppose her motion. Therefore, we consider the motion 

opposed.

The motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief is due on or before 

Thursday, June 4, 2015.

 PER CURIAM
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00477
- CV

In re Tommy Joe Kelley

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Tommy J oe Kell ey , an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal
Jus tice, has filed a document entitled W r i t of Novation , which has been docketed as a petition for
writ of mandamus in this Court. I n this document, relator requests a “ review of trial court
D

- 1

- DC

- 11

- 300379 A and B [i n] the 390th Ju dicial District Court

. ”

W e have revie wed the document and the claims raised. The complaints asserted by relator are the sort of claims that must be raised by way of a post

- conviction application for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crimina l Procedur e
. See Tex.
Code Crim. Proc. a rt. 11.07 , § 5 ; see also Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n. 8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (“[T]he exclusive post

- conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07.”); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of A ppeals for Eighth Dist. , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (“Article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction. ” )

.2 Article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post

- conviction relief from final felony convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc.

art. 11.07 , § 3 ( a ) ; see also Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex. , Fifth Dist. , 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex

. Crim. App. 2013) (“It is well established that only the Court of Criminal Appeals possesses the authority to grant relief in a post

- conviction habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction.”); Keene , 910 S.W.2d at 483 (“ Jurisdiction to grant post conviction habeas corpus relief on a final felony conviction rests exclusive ly with [the Court of Criminal Appeals].”)

.

Moreover, t o the exten t that relator seeks review f r o m this Court of the Court of Criminal Appeal s ’ denial of his 11.07 a ppl ications for writ of habeas corpus , we do not have jurisdiction to review decision s of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Court of Criminal Appeals is the final authority in cr i minal matters. See Tex. Const. a rt. V, § 5(a) ( dec la ring that
Court of Crimin al Appeals is final authority for criminal law in Texas : “i ts determinations shall be final, in all criminal cases of whatever grade ” ) ; see also Moore v. Texas , 137 S. Ct. 1039,
1044 n.1 (2017) (recognizing that “ The CCA is Tex a s ’ cour t of last resort in criminal cases ” (citing Tex. Const. a rt. V , § 5 ) )

.

We do not have jurisdiction to grant relator the relief he seeks

. The petition is
dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ _______ ____________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Ch ief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith
Filed : August 2, 2019
**Exhibit 10.8****2006 Incentive Bonus Program****Performance Criteria**  The following two performance criteria will be used in each entity as measurements in 2006 BonusProgram:**•** Top Line Growth- 50% **•** Net Interest Income plus Fee Income**•** Cash Flow Growth- 50% **•** Net Income After Tax, before loan loss provision, after actual net charge offs**Targeted Base Salary Percentage**The targeted base salary percentage for bonus payment at three possible achievement levels(Threshold, Target and Superior) for each employment level within the Company shall be determinedby the FBFS Board, acting upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. If targetedpercentages for any employment level shall be based on a range, then the percentage for eachparticipating individual within such level shall be determined by the Compensation Committee ormanagement, as appropriate. The targeted base salary percentages for each participating individualshall be promptly communicated to such individual.**Mix of the Payout**           **Corporate** **Entity**FBFS Employees  100%  n/a Other Employees  25%  75%**Safeguards**The cash flow percentage is self-funding.
| |     |  |  |  |  |                                        |  |                  
| | --- |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
| | E10 |  |  |  |  | Shell Annual Report and Form 20-F 2012 |  | reports.shell.com
| |     |  |  |  |  | Exhibits                              



|            
|------------
|EXHIBIT 99.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-177588, 333-177588-01) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-126715, 333-141397 and 333-171206) of the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust of our report dated March 13, 2013, relating to the Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust Financial Statements, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP

|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP
|Jersey, Channel Islands      
|March 13, 2013
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN EDWARD ROBERTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1233

[August 2, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-21202CF10C.

John Edward Roberts, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.1

I, Norman E. Corn, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ION Networks, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 19, 2007





/s/ Norman E. Corn

Norman E. Corn

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of
Exeter Resource Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cecil Bond, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|April 2, 2012 | /s/ Cecil Bond                              
|------------- | --------------------------------------------
|              |                                             
|              | Cecil Bond                                  
|              | Chief Financial Officer                     
|              | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)