alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv4w12w12







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 4.12.12



The taking of this document or any certified copy of it or any other document which constitutes
substitute documentation for it, or any document which includes written confirmations or references
to it, into Austria as well as printing out any e-mail communication which refers to this document
in Austria or sending any e-mail communication to which a pdf scan of this document is attached to
an Austrian addressee or sending any e-mail communication carrying an electronic or digital
signature which refers to this document to an Austrian addressee may cause the imposition of
Austrian stamp duty. Accordingly, keep the original document as well as all certified copies
thereof and written and signed references to it outside of Austria and avoid printing out any
e-mail communication which refers to this document in Austria or sending any e-mail communication
to which a pdf scan of this document is attached to an Austrian addressee or sending any e-mail
communication carrying an electronic or digital signature which refers to this document to an
Austrian addressee.




THIRD SENIOR NOTES REGISTRATION RIGHTS JOINDER



     With respect to the registration rights agreement for the 9.875% Senior Notes due 2019,
dated as of August 9, 2011, among RGHL US Escrow II Inc., a company incorporated under the
laws of the State of Delaware (the “US Corporate Escrow Issuer”), RGHL US Escrow II LLC, a
limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “US LLC
Escrow Issuer” and, together with the US Corporate Escrow Issuer, the “Escrow Issuers”), and
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as representative of the Initial Purchasers (as defined
therein and, such agreement, the “Registration Rights Agreement”), for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, each of the
signatories hereto assumes all of the rights and obligations as a Guarantor under the
Registration Rights Agreement, in each case, as of the date hereof and as though it had
entered into the Registration Rights Agreement on August 9, 2011. The obligations assumed
by the signatories under this joinder shall be joint and several with the obligations of the
Guarantors under the Registration Rights Agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined
in this joinder shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Registration Rights
Agreement.







 









 









     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this joinder to the Registration
Rights Agreement this 14 day of October 2011.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	SIG AUSTRIA HOLDING GMBH

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jennie Blizard
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Jennie Blizard 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Authorized Signatory 	 
	 
	 	SIG COMBIBLOC GMBH

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jennie Blizard
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Jennie Blizard 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Authorized Signatory 	 
	 
	 	SIG COMBIBLOC GMBH & CO KG

(AUSTRIA) represented by its general partner

SIG COMBIBLOC GMBH

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jennie Blizard
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Jennie Blizard 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Authorized Signatory 	 
	 





Third
Joinder to the Registration Rights Agreement (Senior Notes)
**EXHIBIT 31**

I, Eric Montandon certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Asia8, Inc.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2007 

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

**29**

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A2350. ROBERT A. WHEELER v. EMORY HEALTHCARE, INC. et al.

On March 20, 2014, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the defendants

in this civil action. Plaintiff Robert Wheeler filed a motion for an extension of time

in which to serve a motion for a new trial. The trial court granted the motion, ruling

that Wheeler could serve a motion for a new trial up to 60 days after the trial

transcript was filed with the court. On December 11, 2014, Wheeler filed a motion

for a new trial. The court denied that motion, and, on June 5, 2015, Wheeler filed a

notice of appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction.

Although the filing of a motion for a new trial generally extends the deadline

for filing a notice of appeal, such a motion is not valid unless filed within 30 days of

entry of judgment. See OCGA § 5-5-40 (a); Jarrard v. Copeland, 205 Ga. App. 20,

21 (421 SE2d 84) (1992); Wright v. Rhodes, 198 Ga. App. 269, 269 (401 SE2d 35)

(1990). An untimely motion for a new trial does not toll the time for filing a notice

of appeal. Jarrard, supra at 21. Thus, Wheeler’s motion for a new trial, filed more

than eight months after entry of judgment, did not extend the time for filing a notice

of appeal. And although the trial court purported to grant an extension of time for

filing the motion for a new trial, “[n]o extension of time shall be granted for the filing

of motions for new trial or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.” OCGA § 5-6-

39 (b); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Curry, 206 Ga. App. 775, 776-777 (426 SE2d 581)

(1992).

Accordingly, Wheeler’s notice of appeal, filed more than one year after entry

of judgment, is untimely. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). This appeal is therefore

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

September 09, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/09/2015
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification ofQuarterly Report**

I, Gerald McMahon, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350 that:

a.                 the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

b.                theinformation contained in the Report 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ GERALD MCMAHON |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Gerald McMahon     |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ID Technologies Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark K.
Seifert, Acting President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

                                         /s/ Mark K. Seifert
                                         Acting President and Chief Executive
                                         Officer
                                         August 14, 2002
. -^'^KSPORIATiON 

SERVEDJUNE 21 , 2011 < ' OP£RATiO^'S 

n ?3 p |: Tjr: 

J 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SHANE K. NISSEN 

FA A DOCKET No. CP04GL0001 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2004-17101 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On January 8, 2004, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a 

Complaint. Respondent Shane K. Nissen ("Respondent") had earlier filed a Request for 

Heeiring. 

According to Complainant, Respondent has been incarcerated since 2002 and is 

not scheduled to be released until 2017. On June 20, 2011, Complainant withdrew its 

Complaint, stating that the cost to keep the matter open outweighs any public benefit that 

may be derived from a civil penalty. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Complaint having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaint is hereby granted; and 
-•fw-^ >/ 

Attachment - Service List 

g-^' 

1^ 

< ^ . 

CSoodwin 

BtrativeljaWjad^ 

^ f j ' 

-'C^4-, 

r*?. 

i-y 

iHiiJ.' 

iai> 

Jf>> - 3^ ; 

W:.W7' '" .1^',' , c' * 

^•, 

' 

r> 

>4-'.-. a*-,.-

••^. ^ 

-..^•''w 

,5"<X « 

•^: " 

". v,\ 
FAA Docket No. CP04GL0001 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014' 

ONE COPY 

Shane Nissen T-76107 

N.K.S.P. D-6-133L 

P.O. Box 5005 

Delano, CA 93216 

Chris G. Zurales, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: (847)294-7713 

FAX: (847)294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, DC. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

(202) 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX; (202)366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following 

address: Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur 

Wright Building- Room 2014, Washington, DC 20591, Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
| Exhibit I **Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance****with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards**March 10, 2005 As of and for the year ended December31, 2004, Bank of America, NA. Capital Markets Servicing Group (CMSG) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*(USAP), except for minimum servicing standards I.4, II, III.2, III.3, III.4, III.6, V and VI, for which primary servicing of loans is performed by subservicers. As of and for this same period, Bank of America, N.A. had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $325,000,000 and $180,000,000, respectively. */s/ Sean D. Reilly*Sean D. Reilly Principal Commercial Loans Site Manager */s/ H. Michael Lumadue*H. Michael Lumadue Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 12, 2024

No. 04

- 23

- 00459

- CR

EX PARTE Oscar Dominguez ESPINOSA

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14219CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Oscar Dominguez

Espinosa’s appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of

jurisdiction. We further consider Espinosa’s appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and DENY

his request for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 12, 2024

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of June, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada

, Chief Deputy Clerk
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40604 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JOSE HUMBERTO CAPETILLO ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 1767

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Humberto Capetillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Capetillo h a s not filed a ti mely response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40604 Document: 00514071437 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2017No. 16

- 40604

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

t o withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40604 Document: 00514071437 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2017
### 10 Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder,

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED



### Boeing Steve Chapman Numerous Concur.



### Boeing Tiffany Petit Numerous Concur.



### Boeing Jim VanDen Brook Numerous Concur.



### A4A Robert Ireland Numerous Concur.

Other/Additional Information:
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18
of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Intersil Corporation (Intersil), that the quarterly report of Intersil on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 28, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of Intersil.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 2, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard M. Beyer   
|                       |  |     |  | Richard M. Beyer       
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |    
|Date: November 2, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ David A. Zinsner   
|                       |  |     |  | David A. Zinsner       
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 10:04 AM 

To: Andrew Delaski; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Siqueiros; Caskey, 

John; Chad Kennedy; Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eduardo 

Robles; Edwards, Brenda; Eric Petersen; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Rosenquist; Jennifer 

Tiedeman; Jerry Schoen; Jim Raba; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; Katie Coughlin; Matthew Nardotti; 

Maxine Savitz; Meg Waltner; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski, Raymond; Richard W. 

Parker; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert Carmichael; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; 

Scott Beck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas Patzner; Thomas Petrosino; Tim 

Ballo; Vijay Tendulkar; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo 

Subject: LV Tranformer Reg-Neg: Slides for our call 

Colleagues, 

Attached for our meeting today are slides for two short presentations on our call today: 

(1) Navigant slides summarizing the the results of DOE's survey of small businesses as agreed at 

our last meeting; 

(2) A presentation from Tom Patzner with a proposal of EL 3 for DL 7 and EL 2 for DL 8, and 

no change for the tiny category of DL6. He also proposes a modified approach to scaling (see 

slide 7) for very low KVA and for the upper end KVA. I understand, subject to confirmation by 

John Caskey, that his proposal is supported by NEMA. 

See you on the call. 

Richard
From: Rogers, Bob
To: Rogers, Bob ; "Hemann, Chris" ; "Sartain, Elizabeth" ; "Elliott.Bickerstaff@deq.state.ms.us" ; "khead@deq.state.ms.us" ; "mac@adeq.state.ar.us" ; "Jerry_Beasley@deq.state.ms.us" ; Horton, Kate ; "Marc.Corrigan@tn.gov" ; "Kenny.Monroe@kimley-horn.com"
Cc: Holt, Jim ; Fritchie, Denis ; Boyd, Christopher ; "Barry.Stephens@tn.gov" ; "Quincy.Styke@tn.gov" Subject: Analysis (or ‘budget’) years for Shelby County’s maintenance plan
Date: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:20:43 PM

I’m sorry for taking a little extra time in getting out what seems like a simple question, but every time we work on one of these it seems everything gets more complicated. I am including all the people involved in our call on Monday on this message, but I am asking our MPO staff to share it with the complete IAC contact list.

This is what we propose to use for analysis years and why:

· 2012 – Will be our ‘base year’ which effectively will set the budget. A base year can be any year included in the three year average that resulted in clean data (12-14).

· 2015 – Because it is anticipated to be our ‘attainment year’ – From here on, subsequent years lead to requirements to perform conformity determinations

· 2017 – Will be the first interim year – chosen because it is already an analysis year as the final year of the 2 nd 10-year CO maintenance plan.

· 2020 – Will be the next interim year. Chosen because we need a year between 2017 and the end (cannot be over 5 years), and because there exist current TDM data through MPO activities. Initially, we were planning to use 2021 here as the end of the ’97 O3 standard maintenance plan, but that standard was recently revoked for conformity.

· 2024 – Final year of the first maintenance plan. It could be later, but this meets the requirement, and sooner is always better. I have been told we will need TDM data to develop the inventory for this final year.

If anyone has a problem with these choices, please let us know as soon as possible.

To continue the dialogue and maybe help our neighbors along with their planning, I have another
comment to make. I feel we should all use the same base year, but I do not believe it is necessary for all the other years to be the same. Everyone’s transportation planning may be on somewhat different schedules that could cause them to choose different years. Also, obviously no one else has an expiring maintenance plan.

As above, if anyone finds a flaw with this, please let us know.

Bob Rogers, Manager
Pollution Control Shelby County Health Department
814 Jefferson Ave. Memphis TN 38105 (901)222-9599
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3167 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 151. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 151. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 151. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Benzoic acid, 2-[2-[1-[[(2,3- 

dihydro-2-oxo-1Hbenzimidazol-5- 

yl)amino]carbonyl]-2- 

oxopropyl]diazenyl]- (Pigment Yellow 151) (CAS No. 

31837–42–0) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.17.60) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3167 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS