alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,998
<SECURITIES>                                   172,797
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,494
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,404
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,480
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER SALCIDO,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00148-CR

Appeal from the

346th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20190D02393)

O R D E R

On September 1, 2021, Christopher Salcido filed a notice of appeal and requested that this 

Court appoint counsel on appeal for him. This Court does not have the authority to appoint 

counsel. Therefore, the trial court is ORDERED to appoint counsel to represent Appellant on 

appeal. The order of appointment shall be filed with the trial court no later than September 13, 

2021. A copy of the order shall be provided to this Court on or before September 15, 2021. 

Further, the order of appointment shall be included in the clerk’s record once the issue of 

jurisdiction is resolved.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of September, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 6, 2017

No. 04-17-00638-CV

SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING, LLC,

Appellant

v.

REGENCY FILED SERVICES, LLC, Regency Energy Partnersxs,

Appellees

From the 343rd Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M-14-0029-CV-C

Honorable Janna K. Whatley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due on October 26, 2017. On November 2, 2017, the trial court 

clerk filed a notification of late clerk’s record, stating that the clerk’s record has not been filed 

because appellant has failed to file a designation of record.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a) states that the trial court clerk is responsible 

for preparing, certifying, and timely filing the clerk’s record if:

(1) a notice of appeal has been filed; and 

(2) the party responsible for paying for the preparation of the clerk’s 

record has paid the clerk’s fee, has made satisfactory arrangements 

to pay the fee, or is entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a). Appellant has filed a notice of appeal. Further, the trial court clerk has 

not claimed that appellant is not entitled to proceed without paying the fee. Thus, pursuant to 

Rule 35.3(a), the trial court clerk is responsible for preparing, certifying, and timely filing the 

clerk’s record.

Rule 34.5(a) lists the documents to be included in the clerk’s record “[u]nless the parties 

designate the filings in the appellate record by agreement under Rule 34.2.” TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5. 

In civil cases, the documents to be included are the following:
(1) all pleadings on which the trial was held; 

(2) the court’s docket sheet, 

(3) the court’s charge and the jury’s verdict, or the court’s findings of 

fact and conclusions of law;

(4) the court’s judgment or other order that is being appealed;

(5) any request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, any postjudgment motion, and the court’s order on the motion;

(6) the notice of appeal;

(7) any formal bill of exception;

(8) any request for a reporter’s record, including any statement of 

points or issues under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(c);

(9) any request for preparation of the clerk’s record;

(10) a certified bill of costs including the cost of preparing the clerk’s 

record, showing credits for payments made; and

(11) any filing that a party designates to have included in the record.

Thus, appellant is not required to file a designation of materials to be included in the clerk’s 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a); 34.5(a).

We, therefore, ORDER the trial court clerk to file the clerk’s record on or before 

November 27, 2017. In preparing the clerk’s record, the trial court clerk is ORDERED to 

follow Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a).

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
y



### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00711

- CV

RONALD E. INGALLS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ADVENT NETWOR KS, INC.

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE AN D ON BEHALF OF ADVEN T NETWORKS, INC.

, Appellant

V.

SOUTHERN UNION COMPA NY D/B/A/ SOUTHERN U NION TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, L.P., TOM KARAM, AND JOHN E. B RENNAN , Appellee s

Appeal from the 129th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2009

- 06063 ).

TO THE 129TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 15th day of January 2015 , the case upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on May 21, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains

no rever sible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Ronald E. Ingalls, as trustee of the Advent Networks, Inc. Bankruptcy Estate and on behalf of Advent Networks, Inc., pay all appellate costs.The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered January 15, 2015

.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to ob serve the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

March 27, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3013 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3013

      To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of phosphonium, 
  tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-, chloride, polymer with urea, phosphonium, 
           tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-, chloride, formaldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of phosphonium, 
  tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-, chloride, polymer with urea, phosphonium, 
           tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-, chloride, formaldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF PHOSPHONIUM, TETRAKIS(HYDROXYMETHYL)-, CHLORIDE, 
              POLYMER WITH UREA, PHOSPHONIUM, TETRAKIS(HYDROXYMETHYL)-, 
              CHLORIDE, FORMALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Mixtures of         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        phosphonium,                                                       31/2015.......
                        tetrakis(hydroxym
                        ethyl)-,
                        chloride, polymer
                        with urea (CAS
                        No. 27104-30-9)
                        (65%),
                        phosphonium,
                        tetrakis(hydroxym
                        ethyl)-, chloride
                        (1:1) (CAS No.
                        124-64-1) (20%),
                        formaldehyde (CAS
                        No. 50-00-0)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3809.91.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2905 

To reduce temporarily the duty on mixtures of Paraquat technical and Emetic 

PP796. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CONRAD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on mixtures of Paraquat 

technical and Emetic PP796. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF PARAQUAT TECHNICAL AND 

4 EMETIC PP796. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2905 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of 1,1′-dimethyl4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride 

(Paraquat technical) (CAS 

No. 1910–42–5) and 2- 

amino-4,5-dihydro-6-methyl4-propyl-s-triazole-[1,5- 

a]pyrimidin-5-one (Emetic 

PP796) (CAS No. 27277– 

00–5) (provided for in subheading 3808.93.15) ............. 4.3% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2753 

To suspend temporarily the duty on potassium 1,3-dioxo-1H,3H-naphthol[1,8- 

cd]pyran-6-sulfonate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on potassium 1,3-dioxo1H,3H-naphthol[1,8-cd]pyran-6-sulfonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POTASSIUM 1,3-DIOXO-1H,3H-NAPHTHOL[1,8- 

4 CD]PYRAN-6-SULFONATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Potassium 1,3-dioxo-1H,3Hnaphthol[1,8-cd]pyran-6- 

sulfonate (CAS No. 71501– 

16–1) (provided for in subheading 2917.39.04) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2753 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Exhibit 32.1 - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended.

The undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Alliance HealthCard, Inc., certifies that to the undersigneds knowledge, the Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005, which accompanies this
certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Alliance HealthCard, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject
to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Robert D. Garces   
|Robert D. Garces       
|Chief Executive Officer

Date:May 9, 2006
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BEN RAY YODER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3515

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 24, 2019. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, 

Judge. 

Ben Ray Yoder, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate, and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
audited financial statements.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          OCT-31-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               JAN-31-1998
[CASH]                                       1,108,124
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  498,734
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              25,665,574<F1>
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                                0
[BONDS]                                              0
[COMMON]                                             0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                  24,849,175<F2>
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                25,665,574<F3>
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                            12,380,106<F4>
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               954,843
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                             11,425,263
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                         11,425,263
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                11,425,263
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                    64.33<F5>
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net investments
in real estate of $10,466,103, real estate held for sale of $10,570,126
investment in joint venture of $2,552,654, net deferred expenses of $408,938
and other assets of $80,895.
<F2>Other Stockholders' Equity represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities of
$721,542, and other liabilities of $94,857.
<F4>Total revenue includes rent of $1,158,921, gain on sale of real estate of 
$11,048,285, equity in earnings of joint venture of $59,521 and other 
revenues of $113,379.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2924 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Pyrimethanil. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Pyrimethanil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PYRIMETHANIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.85 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Pyrimethanil) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 XX - XXXX Directorate ID : 20 13 - SW - 075 -AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Model EC135P1, P2, P2+, T2 and T2+ Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 275 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in the ring frame and prevent loss of the tail rotor and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 18,500 if a ring frame is replaced. Labor per Helicopter ( 0.2 work-hour x 

### $ 8 5 /work hour for the inspection) $17 Other (5 work hours to replace a ring frame) $425 to replace a ring frame $18,925 for parts and labor per helicopter to replace a ring frame. Total Cost per Helicopter $ 17 for the inspection Total US Fleet Cost $ 4,675 for the inspection Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Matt Fuller
exv10w3w1



 





EXHIBIT 10.3.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of February 1, 2008, to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of the
11th day of October, 1989 (the “Agreement”), by and between UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC., a
Texas corporation, and Bill Hughes. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
same meanings as in the Agreement.



     WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into the Agreement to set forth the terms and
conditions of Employee’s continued employment with Employer; and



     WHEREAS, Employer and Employee have agreed to an amendment to the Agreement, effective
February 1, 2008;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained,
Employer and Employee hereby agree as follows:




	1.	 	Section 1 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety by:






     “1. Employment. Effective February 1, 2008, Employer hereby employs Employee
in the capacity of Senior Vice President –Development to undertake and discharge, in
accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, such duties, functions and
responsibilities as are from time to time delegated to Employee by Employer’s President &
CEO. Employee shall generally be required to provide services during the Amended Term
(defined below) at Employer’s Dallas location.”




	2.	 	The first two sentences of Section 2 of the Agreement will be deleted and replaced by:






     “The term of this Agreement, as amended shall commence as of the Amendment Date and
continue until February 1, 2009 (the “Amended Term”).”




	3.	 	Exhibit A, as referred to in Section 3 will be replaced in its entirety with the attached
Exhibit A, which sets forth, among other items, compensation for the Employee during the
Amended Term.




 









 










4. Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment No. 1 shall not by implication or
otherwise, alter, modify, amend, or in any way affect the terms and conditions set forth in the
Agreement, all of which shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby reaffirmed as if set
forth at length herein.



5. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,
but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have executed this Amendment
No. 1 as of February 1, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
President & CEO
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Bill Hughes
Woodrow UNDERWOOD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4092

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 04, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 MARK NEWTON , 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3

v. NO. 31,824 4 VINCENT MASTRONTONI, 5 BETTY GARRISON, and 6 WEBB GARRISON, 7 Respondents-Appellees. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 9 Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge 10 Will Ferguson & Associates 11 David M. Houliston 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 Collins & Collins, P.C. 14 Parrish Collins 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellant 17 Kalm Law Firm, P.C. 18 Megan M. Kalm 19 Albuquerque, NM 20 for Appellees 212 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 VIGIL, Judge. 2 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 3 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 4 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 5 DISMISSED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7

_______________________________ 8 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 9
WE CONCUR: 10

_________________________________ 11 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 12

_________________________________ 13 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 14