alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
All Weather Systems, Inc. - Weather Systems - Louisville, KY

Complete Remodeling Services for Residential Properties

Serving Kentuckiana Since 1973

Member Better Business Bureau and Home Builders Association

• Kitchens • Bath • Basements

• Attics • Decks • Porches

• Sunrooms • Additions • Vinyl Siding

• Windows • Doors • Patio Covers

• Carports • Saunas • Before & After

We have been in this business continuously since 1973. The experience of our people totals over 300 years, 

of successfully working with homeowners to meet . . . no, to exceed their dreams. From planning your project with 

3-D computer generated designs, through the financing arrangements, to the completion of your project . . . 

http://www.allweathersystems.com/ (1 of 6) [4/11/2010 12:05:28 PM]
All Weather Systems, Inc. - Weather Systems - Louisville, KY

December 4, 2008: All Weather Systems, Inc. receives 25 year plaque as a continuous accredited member of 

the Better Business Bureau from Mr. Charlie Mattingly, President. Presented to Mrs. Sarah Hartmann, President 

and owner of All Weather Systems, Inc. for over 35 years. 

http://www.allweathersystems.com/ (2 of 6) [4/11/2010 12:05:28 PM]
All Weather Systems, Inc. - Weather Systems - Louisville, KY

● We make it as easy and painless for less stress on you. 

● We know you will be a satisfied customer. 

● We strive to perform nothing less than quality installations. 

● Our crews have all been with us for over 10 years, some over 20 years. 

● We only use licensed plumbers and electricians. 

● We are fully licensed and insured with liability and workers' compensation. 

● We continually look for the newest trends, improved products and designs to provide our clients with the best 

value for their investment. 

● We order the materials and schedule your project as promptly as we can. 

● We handle the permits, plans, cleanup, and hauling away for all job debris. 

Results !

http://www.allweathersystems.com/ (3 of 6) [4/11/2010 12:05:28 PM]
All Weather Systems, Inc. - Weather Systems - Louisville, KY

A truly satisfied customer who comes back again and again !.

In-home financing available to qualified applicants at the best rates we can find to meet your particular needs. 

We can custom fit a payment to fit your budget. Consolidation loans and refinancing are available also.

 

Kitchen remodeling completed 2003

http://www.allweathersystems.com/ (4 of 6) [4/11/2010 12:05:28 PM]
All Weather Systems, Inc. - Weather Systems - Louisville, KY

Deck with Patio Entry

Interior and Exterior Pictures

Doing your Project

All Weather Systems, Inc.

4419 Poplar Level Road, Louisville, KY 40213 

P.O. Box 35485 • Louisville, KY 40232 

● Kentucky Phones: (502) 635-0001, (502) 458-7313 

● Indiana Phone: (812) 284-0635 

● Fax: (502) 458-7374 

e-mail AWS98@aol.com 

http://www.allweathersystems.com/ (5 of 6) [4/11/2010 12:05:28 PM]
All Weather Systems, Inc. - Weather Systems - Louisville, KY

[ Welcome ] [ Interior and Exterior Remodeling ] [ Gallery ] [ Testimonials ] 

Member of the Louisville Better Business Bureau

http://www.allweathersystems.com/ (6 of 6) [4/11/2010 12:05:28 PM]
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2006-1565, -1566 

POSTX CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

MAYFIELD PRINCIPALS FUND II, MAYFIELD XI QUALIFIED, 

MAYFIELD XI, MAYFIELD IX, L.P., MAYFIELD ASSOCIATES FUND VI, 

and MAYFIELD ASSOCIATES FUND IV, L.P., 

Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, 

v. 

SECURE DATA IN MOTION, INC. 

(doing business as Sigaba), 

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant. 

George M. Sirilla, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia, 

argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee, PostX Corporation, and counterclaim 

defendants-appellees, Mayfield Principals Fund II, et al. With him on the brief were 

Joseph R. Tiffany II and John M. Grenfell, of Palo Alto, California, and Kevin T. Kramer, of 

Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief was William F. Abrams, Bingham McCutchen 

LLP, of Palo Alto, California. 

John L. Cooper, Farella Braun and Martel LLP, of San Francisco, California, 

argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant, Secure Data in Motion, Inc. (doing 

business as Sigaba). With him on the brief were Jeffrey M. Fisher and Stephanie Powers 

Skaff. Of counsel were Eric W. Bass and James W. Morando. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California 

Judge Susan Illston 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2006-1565, -1566 

POSTX CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

MAYFIELD PRINCIPALS FUND II, MAYFIELD XI QUALIFIED, 

MAYFIELD XI, MAYFIELD IX, L.P., MAYFIELD ASSOCIATES FUND VI, 

and MAYFIELD ASSOCIATES FUND IV, L.P., 

Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, 

v. 

SECURE DATA IN MOTION, INC. 

(doing business as Sigaba), 

 Defendant/Counterciaimant-Appellant. 

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of California 

in CASE NO(S). 02-CV-04483 and 03-CV-00521 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

 

DATED: August 17, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2981 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2981

  To suspend temporarily the duty on diphosphoric acid, polymers with 
   ethoxylated reduced methyl esters of reduced polymerized oxidized 
                          tetrafluoroethylene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on diphosphoric acid, polymers with 
   ethoxylated reduced methyl esters of reduced polymerized oxidized 
                          tetrafluoroethylene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIPHOSPHORIC ACID, POLYMERS WITH ETHOXYLATED REDUCED METHYL 
              ESTERS OF REDUCED POLYMERIZED OXIDIZED 
              TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Diphosphoric acid,  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polymers with                                                      31/2015.......
                        ethoxylated
                        reduced methyl
                        esters of reduced
                        polymerized
                        oxidized
                        tetrafluoroethyle
                        ne (CAS No.
                        200013-65-6)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3904.69.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60728

Summary Calendar

ROBERTA CRISTINA BARBOSA-SOUZA; JEAN GABRIEL SOUZA,

Petitioners

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A096 076 680

BIA No. A096 076 681

Before KING, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roberta Cristina Barbosa-Souza and her son, Jean Gabriel Souza, both

natives and citizens of Brazil, petition this court for review of an order from the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their motion to reconsider the

dismissal of their appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of their motion

to reopen their removal proceedings. They argue that (1) there was no in

absentia determination because the IJ deemed their applications for relief to be

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 30, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60728 Document: 00511526048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2011
No. 10-60728

abandoned, (2) they rebutted the presumption of effective notice afforded to the

mailing of the notices of hearing by regular mail, (3) the lack of effective notice

of their removal hearing and their inability to present their applications for

relief from removal violated their rights to due process, and (4) the BIA engaged

in impermissible fact-finding. Because they did not exhaust their first and last

arguments by raising them before the BIA, we lack jurisdiction to consider them. 

See Roy v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004).

The record and the relevant legal authorities do not support the Souzas’

assertion that they rebutted the presumption of effective notice. Though the IJ

erroneously listed the address of the Souzas as being in Newark, NY, the actual

address on the Notice to Appear is in Newark, NJ, and the IJ stated that the

notice of hearing was mailed to the address on the Notice to Appear. The BIA

likewise noted that the notices had been mailed to the addresses shown on the

NTAs. Because all of the relevant documents in the record except for the IJ’s

erroneous reference show the Souzas’ address as being in New Jersey, they have

failed to rebut the presumption that they received effective notice. The Souzas

have thus failed to show that their rights to due process were violated and have

failed to make the requisite showing regarding the BIA’s decision. See Singh v.

Gonzales, 436 F.3d 484, 487-88 (5th Cir. 2006).

The petition for review is DENIED.

2

Case: 10-60728 Document: 00511526048 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2011
,EDS 41

. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street %PROd San

Dr. Chung S. Liu Deputy Executive Officer Science and Technology Advancement South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Dear Dr. Liu: 

### Thank you for your submission ofthe South CoastAir Quality Monitoring DistrictAnnual Air Quality MonitoringNetwork Plan. We recognize that producing this document and the associatedpublic inspectionprocess represented newrequirements and we appreciate your effortto meet them. We have reviewedthe submitted document and have found that it fully meet the requirements set forth under40 CFR Part 58.10. If

### you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact 

### me at (415) 972-3261 or Catherine Brown at (415) 947-4137. Sincerely, 

# 14 Sean P. Hogan, Manager Air Quality Analysis Office Air Division

cc: P. Fine
----

**Exhibit 32.2**

**  **

** **

**CERTIFICATE OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Seitel, Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2008, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, William J. Restrepo, Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that:

 
| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | The Report fully complies with  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)

The information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 13, 2008

  /s/ William J. Restrepo

William J. Restrepo

Principal Financial Officer

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement, required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and willbe furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

  |
TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKSPSP 601−5Page1 of 2May 31/2011TR5−250TEMPORARY REVISION NO.5−250INSERT IN SECTION 5−10−30FACING PAGE 24REASON FOR ISSUE:To introduce a visual check of the engine support beam.ACTION:Add the task that follows to the list of Chapter 53 checks:NOTE:Recordthe incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONSand the LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheets at the front of this publication.TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKSPSP 601−5Page2 of 2May 31/2011TR5−250MAINTENANCEMANUAL − CH. 5REFERENCEZONEACCESSCHECKINTERVALCHAPTER 53 CHECKSDESCRIPTION53−10−00−198*Engine Support Beam.Visual Check. 7800 T(Ref. PSP 612, Part 9, VC−53−10−81) LANDINGS1100 RLANDINGSPHASE-IN:For aircraft with 7300 Landings or less at the dateof TR 5-250 (May 31/2011), do this check no laterthan 7800 Landings.For aircraft with more than 7300 Landings butless than 8550 landings at the date of TR 5-250(May 31/2011), do this check within 500 Landingsor by Dec 31/2013 whichever occurs first.For aircraft with 8550 Landings or more at thedate of TR 5-250 (dated May 31/2011), do thischeck within 250 Landings or by Dec 31/2013whichever occurs first.310311312311−BB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 21, 2009 will be:
    - Formal order of investigation;
    - Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    - Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature;
    - Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

*For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:*                     The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.                

Dated: April 16, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-9179 Filed 4-17-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE;P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00459-CR

JOSEPH FOLSE

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-CR-1135-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 2, 2015
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2530 CALVIN SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Defendant - Appellee, and HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY; HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; RAYTHEON COMPANY, Defendants. No. 99-1255 CALVIN SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY; HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; RAYTHEON COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees,2 and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Defendant. No. 99-1256 CALVIN SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Defendant - Appellee, and HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY; HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; RAYTHEON COMPANY, Defendants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-2010-A) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999* Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). 3 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, * Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Shoemaker, Appellant Pro Se. Brian David Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Francis Eugene Purcell, Jr., Lora A. Brzezynski, MCKENNA & CUNEO, Washington, D.C.; Thomas Michael Abbott, Philip B. Kumpis, MCKENNA & CUNEO, Los Angeles, California, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM:Calvin Shoemaker appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this qui tam civil action filed pursuant to the False Claims Act. See 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b) (1994). Shoemaker also appeals the district court’s order declining to reconsider the dismissal of his claims against the United States Army. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shoemaker v. Hughes Aircraft Co., No. CA-97-2010-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, Oct. 2, 1998, & Feb. 1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the AnnualReport of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)     The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Steven R. Williams                                                                                                 | Ma | December 21, 2006 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-------------------|
| Steven R. Williams,

Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer                                                             |    |
| Petroleum Development Corporation, 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant                                        |    |
|                                                                                                                        |    |
|                                                                                                                        |    |
| /s/ Richard W. McCullough                                                                                              |    | December 21, 2006 |
| Richard W. McCullough                                                                                                  |    |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer

Petroleum Development Corporation,

Managing General Partner of the Registrant |    |

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided the Registrantand will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Stinger Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:     (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.         By:       /s/ David J. Meador    David J. Meador   *Chief Financial Officer*   Date: March 31, 2006A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to StingerSystems, Inc. and will be retained by Stinger Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Stinger Systems,Inc., whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.