alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 6th 2015

US DRONE AVIATION LLC 

U.S. Department of Transportation,

Docket Management System,

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Petition to Amend Exemption 11855; Docket No. FAA-2015-1163

Dear Sir or Madam: 

US Drone Aviation LLC hereby petitions for an amendment to Exemption No. 11855 issued to

US Drone Aviation LLC on June 18, 2015 to permit unmanned aircraft system ("UAS") 

operations for a variety of services. US Drone Aviation respectfully requests that the FAA amend 

Exemption No. 11855 to include an additional airframe for operations pertaining to oil and gas 

emission monitoring with the use of a proprietary sensor. This request is solely to add an 

additional airframe, all existing conditions of the Exemption 11855 will be adhered to by US 

Drone Aviation LLC in all operations of sUAS’s.

The requested amendment to Exemption No. 11855 would add the “Tempest” airframe from 

UASUSA of Boulder CO. This airframe has been operating under many COA’s including COA 

2013-CFA-75. The Tempest has an exemplary safety record of operations, weighs less than 55lbs 

and will be integrated into US Drone Aviation’s flightline providing services to the oil and gas 

industry for Greenhouse Gas emissions monitoring. 

Attached by separate document are specifications and background information on the Tempest 

airframe which we respectfully request be retained as private and confidential proprietary 

information not for the public docket. 

We respectively request an amendment to exemption No 11855 to enable US Drone Aviation to 

operate efficient, limited, low-risk commercial sUAS operations for the activities stated,

respecting at all times the space and privacy of citizens and property while keeping airspace safe. 

Sincerely

Stephen Elms 

US Drone Aviation LLC

P.O. Box 7998,

Jackson, WY 83002

(307) 264-2959

steve@USDroneAviation.com
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 17, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 17, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20A0929. TAMMIE G. BAXTER et al. v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 010 9

_____________________________
A NTHONY G EORGE B ROWN II
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John F. Simon, Jr. , Judge

.

March 6, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and R OBERTS and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler Kemper Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 VOLUME SERVICES AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 1999
    
    2000
    
    2001
    
    2002
    
    2003Income (loss) before income taxes and
cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
    
    
    (6,568
    )
    
    
    (5,507
    )
    
    
    (4,032
    )
    
    
    4,309
    
    
    
    (10,755
    )Add Fixed Charges:Interest Expense (excluding capitalized)
    
    
    21,554
    
    
    
    25,066
    
    
    
    21,998
    
    
    
    19,311
    
    
    
    25,856Amortization of loan costs
    
    
    1,475
    
    
    
    1,511
    
    
    
    1,431
    
    
    
    1,431
    
    
    
    6,907Interest factor in rents
    
    
    643
    
    
    
    878
    
    
    
    812
    
    
    
    865
    
    
    
    788Total earnings as defined
    
    
    17,104
    
    
    
    21,948
    
    
    
    20,209
    
    
    
    25,916
    
    
    
    22,796Fixed Charges:Interest Expense
    
    
    21,554
    
    
    
    25,066
    
    
    
    21,998
    
    
    
    19,311
    
    
    
    25,856Amortization of loan costs
    
    
    1,475
    
    
    
    1,511
    
    
    
    1,431
    
    
    
    1,431
    
    
    
    6,907Interest factor in rents
    
    
    643
    
    
    
    878
    
    
    
    812
    
    
    
    865
    
    
    
    78823,672
    
    
    
    27,455
    
    
    
    24,241
    
    
    
    21,607
    
    
    
    33,551Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.20
    
    
    
    Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges
    
    
    (6,568
    )
    
    
    (5,507
    )
    
    
    (4,032
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (10,755
    )
Exhibit 31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I, Steve M. Hanni, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Medizone International, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer=s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer=s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer=s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer=s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 13, 2008  /s/Steve M. Hanni Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zhong Ya Li, Chief financial officer of us, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2011





By:
s/ Zhong Ya LiZhong Ya Li, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
        32**
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 Each
        of
        the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
        adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
        Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
        September 30, 2007  fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
        information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 This
        13th
        day of November, 2007
 
 
 /s/
        David D. Stovall
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 
 
 /s/
        Annette Banks
 Chief
        Financial Officer
From: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> 

Date: 08/10/2010 09:29 AM 

Subject: Reg text changes in FIP package 

Christine, I will call you now. 

PART 52 - [Amended]

 §52.37. What are the requirements of the Federal 

Implementation Plans (FIPs) to issue permits under the 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration requirements to sources 

that emit greenhouse gases? 

(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean 

Air Act are not met to the extent the plan, as approved, of the 

states listed in paragraph (b) of this section does not apply 

with respect to GHG emissions from certain stationary sources. 

Therefore, the provisions of §52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are 

hereby made a part of the plan for each state listed in 

paragraph (b) of this section: 

(1) beginning January 2, 2011, the pollutant GHGs from 

stationary sources described in §52.21(b)(49)(iv), and 

(2) beginning July 1, 2011, in addition to the pollutant 

described under paragraph (a) of this section, 

[Alternative 1 for the rest of this paragraph (a)(2) of this 

section] 
the pollutant GHGs from stationary sources described in 

§52.21(b)(49)(v) 

[Alternative 2 for the rest of this paragraph (a)(2) of this 

section] 

beginning July 1, 2011, stationary sources described in 

§52.21(b)(49)(iv). 

(b) Paragraph (a) of this section applies to: 

(1) Alaska; 

(2) Arizona, Pinal County; Rest of State (Excludes Maricopa 

County, Pima County, and Indian Country); 

(3) Arkansas; 

(4) California, Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD; 

(5) Connecticut; 

(6) Florida; 

(7) Idaho; 

(8) Kansas; 

(9) Kentucky, Jefferson County and Rest of State; 

(10) Nebraska, Lincoln Lancaster; Omaha; and Rest of State; 

(11) Nevada, Clark County; 

(12) Oregon; 

(13) Texas 

Raj Rao, P.E. 

Group Leader, NSRG 

OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 

109 TW Alexander Drive 

RTP, NC 27709 

919-541-5344 

919-541-5509 fax 
Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative 

and Confidential.
<TABLE>

Exhibit 11.  Computation Re: Earnings Per Share
                       (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
<CAPTION>

                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Three Months Ended,                            Six Months Ended,
                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   June 30, 1999          June 30, 1998               June 30, 1999               June 30, 1998
                           ------------------------  ----------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------------
                                   Weighted   Per           Weighted   Per         Weighted   Per                Weighted      Per
                                   Average   Share           Average  Share         Average  Share                Average      Share
                           Income  Shares   Amount   Income  Shares  Amount  Income Shares   Amount  Income       Shares      Amount
                           ------------------------  ----------------------- ---------------------- --------  ----------- ----------
<S>                        <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>    <C>      <C>     <C>      <C>         <C>

Basic Earnings per
   Common Share
Income available to
   common shareholders     $2,478  7,212    $0.34    $1,427  7,193   $0.20   $4,764 7,209    $0.66   $3,405       7,180       $0.47
                                           =======                  ======                  =======                          =======

Effect of Dilutive Shares
Options issued to
   management                   -     33                  -     70                -    35                 -          70
                           ------- ------            -------- ----           ------- -----           -------      ------

Diluted Earnings per
   Common Share            $2,478  7,245    $0.34    $1,427  7,263   $0.20   $4,764 7,244    $0.66   $3,405       7,250       $0.47
                           ======= ====== =========  ======= ====== ======== ====== ======= ======== =======  ===========    =======
</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 06, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 06, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0015. BERNICE ALLEN v. PIKE NURSERIES ACQUISITIONS, LLC, d/b/a PIKE 

NURSERIES.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16C07283
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

August 17, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with the Truman Project to discus s the EPA/NHTSA Proposed Rulemaking

for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Yea r 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles

FROM: William Charmley, US EPA

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo documents a meeting held on December 6, 2 011 between representatives of the Truman Project and EPA to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Pro posed Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017-2025 Light-D uty Vehicles. This meeting took place in Washington, D.C., though two EPA participants we re tied in by video-conference.

The meeting attendees from the Truman Project inclu ded Lauren Wolfe and Benjamin Lowe, and from EPA included Margo Oge, Chet France, and Bill Charmley.

The discussion topics were limited to comments from the Truman Project representatives regarding their overall support for the proposal du e to the proposal’s positive impacts on energy security, climate change impacts, and American comp etitiveness. In addition, the Truman Project representatives asked for additional detail s regarding the upcoming public hearings for the proposal.
Douglas SPARGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-686

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 122/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 122 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 596 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 122

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 596 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2016/C 122/1 | Common Military List of the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2016/C 122/1

Common Military List of the European Union

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         19,980
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  50,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (26,088)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         5,647,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,343,458)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,470,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        4,319,610
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (103,138)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,470,063
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               653,703
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               371,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               5,705
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             340,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (63,554)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (63,554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (63,554)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (7.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (7.84)
<FN>
NOTE: TOTAL CURENT ASSETS AND TOTAL CURRENT
      LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE BECAUSE
      REGISTRANT DOES NOT PRESENT A CLASSIFIED
      BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Asia4Sale.com, Inc., (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Eric Montandon, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant

| | at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EX-10.24



 





Exhibit 10.24




POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.




Summary Sheet of Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 

(Effective January 1, 2008)




	 	 	 
	Cash Retainer:

	 	$3,000 per month
	 
	 	 
	Committee Chairman Fees:

	 	$7,500 per year
	 
	 	 
	Meeting Fees:

	 	$1,500 per meeting of a Committee of the Board,
provided only one meeting fee is payable per day,
regardless of how many meetings are held that day
	 
	 	 
	Restricted Stock Grants:

	 	Upon initial election, $100,000 in fair market
value (valued upon date of grant based upon the
closing sale price of the Common Stock as
reported on its principal trading stock exchange
or market) of restricted shares of Common Stock,
vesting in three equal annual installments
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Upon re-election, $50,000 in fair market value
(valued upon date of grant based upon the closing
sale price of the Common Stock as reported on its
principal stock trading exchange or market) of
restricted shares of Common Stock, vesting in
four equal quarterly installments