alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9061]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

April 15, 2009.
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, and 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 21, 2009 to 
be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1428.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Form: 8023.
    Title: Elections Under Section 338 for Corporations Making 
Qualified Stock Purchases.
    Description: Form 8023 is used by corporations that acquire the 
stock of another corporation to elect to treat the purchase of stock as 
a purchase of the other corporation's assets. The IRS uses Form 8023 to 
determine if the purchasing corporation reports the sale of its assets 
on its income tax return and to determine if the purchasing corporation 
has properly made the election.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 2,559 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-1191.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: INTL-868-89 (Final) Information with Respect to Certain 
Foreign-Owned Corporations.
    Description: The regulations require record maintenance, annual 
information filing, and the authorization of the U.S. Corporation to 
act as an agent for IRS summons purposes. These requirements allow IRS 
International examiners to better audit the returns of U.S. 
corporations engaged in crossborder transactions with a related party.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 630,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: R. Joseph Durbala, (202) 622-3634, Internal 
Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, (202) 395-7873, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-9061 Filed 4-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00428-CV

FIFTY-ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FOUR DOLLARS in US 

Currency, et al.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-17-658-A

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial. It is ORDERED that 

Graciano Garcia, Jr. recover his costs of this appeal from appellee The State of Texas.

SIGNED April 24, 2019.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Exhibit 31.2



I, Patrick E. Delaney, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ION Networks, Inc.;



2

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ Patrick E. Delaney

Patrick E. Delaney

Chief Financial Officer





























2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

d0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

145316

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145316

COA: 306256

Wayne CC: 06-006726-FC

MICHAEL TERRENCE CANNON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6042

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

GEORGE MCBRIDE, a/k/a Benzo,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:00-cr-00069-MR-3)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

George McBride seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that McBride has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.29
 
 SEPARATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
  Separation Date:
 Release
 Noncompete:




---



##### 



Acknowledgment:
 (a)
    
    The execution of this Agreement shall not constitute any admission
by Novelis that it has violated any federal, state or local statute, ordinance,
rule, regulation or common law, or that Employee has any meritorious claims
whatsoever against Novelis.(b)
    
    No promise or inducement has been offered to Employee, except as
herein set forth;(c)
    
    This Agreement is being executed voluntarily and knowingly by
Employee and Novelis without reliance upon any statements by others or their
representatives concerning the nature or extent of any claims or damages or
legal liability therefore;(d)
    
    This Agreement has been written in understandable language, and all
provisions hereof are understood by Employee and Novelis;(e)
    
    Employee is advised, and has had an opportunity, to consult with an
attorney of Employees own choosing prior to executing this Agreement;(f)
    
    Employee will receive, pursuant to this Agreement, a taxable lump
sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), which is consideration in addition
to anything of value to which the Employee is already entitled;(g)
    
    Employee has twenty-one (21) days from the receipt of this Agreement
in which to decide whether to enter into this Agreement, sign it and return it
to Bob Virtue at Novelis Human Resource Department, at 3399 Peachtree Rd. NE,
Suite 1500 Atlanta, GA 30326 The Employee may sign this Agreement and return it
to Bob Virtue prior to the expiration of the 21-day period; and(h)
    
    Employee has the right to revoke this Agreement during the seven (7)
day period by mailing a letter of revocation to Bob Virtue at the above address.
Such a letter must be signed and received by Novelis no later than the seventh
day after the date on which Employee signed the Agreement. This Agreement shall
not become effective or enforceable until the seven (7) day revocation period
expires.(i)
    
    This Agreement shall be governed by the law of Georgia.
 2




---



##### 



Entirety of Agreement:
 Severability:
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 Employee
    
    Novelis Inc.David Godsell
    
    Robert VirtueDate
    
    DateNovember 12, 2007
    
    November 19, 2007Witness
    
    WitnessSally S. Ingram
    
    Chris Courts
  3
**Exhibit32.2**

 

 

**Certification of Periodic Financial Reports**

 

I, Barry Golko, of Analytical Surveys, Inc., certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ended MARCH 31, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”) which thisstatement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Periodic Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Analytical Surveys, Inc.

 

 
| Dated:   May  16, 2005 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/  Barry Golko                      |   |   |
| Barry Golko                           |   |
| Chief  Accounting Officer             |   |
|                                       |        |  |

 

----
From: Wood,	Gil	

Sent: Friday,	June	27,	2014	1:28	PM

To: Cole,	David

Cc: Wood,	Gil;	Aldridge,	Amanda;	Edwards,	Chebryll;	Toney,	Mike;	Sanchez,	Rafael;	Banks,	Julius;	Jordan,	

Scott

Subject: EPA	Certification	Data	by	Burn	Rate	for	Certifications	between	January	1,	2010	and	May	30,	

2014	

Please add the 8 attached files to the docket in support of the Residential Wood Heaters NSPS revisions.

The attached emission data files are redacted [non-confidential] pages from all wood heater NSPS 

certification tests between January 1, 2010 and May 30, 2014.

The attached emission data files include the emission data per each of the burn rate categories used in 

the official EPA weighted averages.

Gil Wood
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18250-18251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9268]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

Sunshine Act; Notice of Matters To Be Deleted from the Agenda of 
a Previously Announced Agency Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Tuesday, April 21, 2009.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matter to be Deleted: 1. Final Rule--Part 717, Subpart E, Sections 
717.40-717.43, Appendix E of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Fair Credit 
Reporting.
    2. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking--Part 717, Subpart E, 
Sections 717.40-717.43, Appendix E of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Fair Credit Reporting.

[[Page 18251]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-9268 Filed 4-17-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          6,695
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                      229
<INVENTORY>                                    10,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,845
<PP&E>                                          8,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,893
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           89
<OTHER-SE>                                      6,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39,048
<SALES>                                        12,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,866
<CGS>                                           8,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   313
<INCOME-TAX>                                       11
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               302
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .03
        


</TABLE>
Statement of the Air and Radiat ion Management Administration Department of the Environment

for the Public Hearing Relating to Proposed Amendments to Regulation .07 Paper, Film, Foil, Vinyl and Other Plastic Parts Coating under COMAR 26.11.19 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes held on January 21, 2010 Baltimore, MD

My name is Husain Waheed. I am a Senior Regulatory and Compliance Engineer with the Regulation Development Division of the Ai r and Radiation Management Administration, Department of the Environment.

This public hearing is being held pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR Section 51.102

and Sections 2-301 et.seq. of the Environment Artic le, Annotated Code of Maryland. It is also being held in conformance with the State Administrative Procedures Act under the State Government Article, beginning at Section 10-101.

Notice of this hearing appeared in the:

Maryland Register on December 18, 2009; MDE's website on December 17, 2009 to January 21, 2010; Baltimore Sun on December 18, 2009; Saint Mary's Enterprise on December 18, 2009; Cumberland Times-News on December 18, 2009; Frederick News-Post on December 18, 2009; Salisbury Daily Times on December 18, 2009; and the Washington Post on December 17, 2009.

Copies of these notices were submitted for the record.

Copies of the proposed action and supporting documents were submitted for review to the State Clearinghouse and are also submitted at this time into the hearing record. Copies were also made available for public inspection at th e Air and Radiation Management Administration offices in Baltimore, Cumberland, and Salisbury, and at all local health departments or local air quality control offices.

The purpose of today's hearing is to give the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments to Regulation .07 under COMAR 26.11.19.

Summary

These amendments establish VOC requirements for coating lines that have potential to emit 25 tons or greater per year. A person subject to this regulation may either meet VOC emission limits or use an add-on emission control device to reduce VOC emissions by 90%.

12 Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP)

These amendments will be submitted to the EPA for approval as part of the SIP.

Consideration of Comments

The Department will consider all comments before making a decision to adopt these

amendments.
```

[Federal Register: June 16, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 115)]
[Notices]               
[Page 34200]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16jn10-115]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7050]

 
Notice of Proposal To Extend the Agreement Between the Government 
of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of 
Nicaragua Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on 
Archaeological Material From the Pre-Hispanic Cultures of the Republic 
of Nicaragua

    The Government of the Republic of Nicaragua has informed the 
Government of the United States of its interest in an extension of the 
Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and 
the Government of the Republic of Nicaragua Concerning the Imposition 
of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Hispanic 
Cultures of the Republic of Nicaragua, and possible additional 
restrictions on certain ethnological material.
    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Under Secretary for Public 
Diplomacy and Public Affairs, and pursuant to the requirement under 19 
U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of this Agreement is hereby proposed.
    Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of 
the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will 
be requested.
    A copy of the Agreement, the Designated List of restricted 
categories of material, and related information can be found at the 
following Web site: http://exchanges.state.gov/heritage/culprop.

Judith A. McHale,
Under Secretary, Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-14502 Filed 6-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3043 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3043

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on certain women's 
footwear, covering the ankle, whose height from the bottom of the outer 
 sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 8 inches, designed to be 
 worn in lieu of, but not over, other footwear as a protection against 
     water, oil, grease, or chemicals or cold or inclement weather.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2012

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on certain women's 
footwear, covering the ankle, whose height from the bottom of the outer 
 sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 8 inches, designed to be 
 worn in lieu of, but not over, other footwear as a protection against 
     water, oil, grease, or chemicals or cold or inclement weather.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR, COVERING THE ANKLE, WHOSE HEIGHT 
              FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE OUTER SOLE TO THE TOP OF THE UPPER 
              DOES NOT EXCEED 8 INCHES, DESIGNED TO BE WORN IN LIEU OF, 
              BUT NOT OVER, OTHER FOOTWEAR AS A PROTECTION AGAINST 
              WATER, OIL, GREASE, OR CHEMICALS OR COLD OR INCLEMENT 
              WEATHER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.75 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain women's footwear, 
covering the ankle, whose height from the bottom of the outer sole to 
the top of the upper does not exceed 8 inches, designed to be worn in 
lieu of, but not over, other footwear as a protection against water, 
oil, grease, or chemicals or cold or inclement weather) is amended--
            (1) in the article description, by striking ``$20/pair'' 
        and inserting ``$23/pair''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered January 23, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-23-00028-CV

IN RE ROBERT B. READ, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-81170-06

ORDER Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition

for writ of mandamus, and we STRIKE relator’s petition for writ of mandamus,

including its appendix.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE