alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 307 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 307

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 217 West King Street, Martinsburg, West Virginia, as the ``W. Craig 
      Broadwater Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 217 
West King Street, Martinsburg, West Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``W. Craig Broadwater Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``W. Craig Broadwater Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate February 17, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 307

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 217 West King Street, Martinsburg, West Virginia, as the ``W. Craig 
      Broadwater Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
```
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29993 NO. SCWC-29993 18-JAN-2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I 09:17 AM
MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
vs. STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CR. NO. 08-1-0869) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., for the court 1 )It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter has not been entered by the Intermediate Court of Appeals, see Hawai ' i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2008); see also Hawai ' i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2008),IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/DefendantAppellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed January 11, 2011, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (“No later than 90 days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, any party may apply in writing to the supreme court for a writ of certiorari.”). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, January 18, 2011. FOR THE COURT:

Chief Justice Michael C. Tierney, appearing pro se, on the application

1 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Pollack, assigned by reason of vacancy.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Steve M. Hanni, Chief Financial Officer of Medizone International, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Medizone
International, Inc. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 18, 2005
/s/ Steve M. Hanni
Steve M. Hanni
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.1
                              C.E.O. Certification




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Red Butte Energy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
for the period  ending  September  30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Spooner, Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



 /s/ Charles Spooner
Charles Spooner
Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2002
APPENDIX C DJI Inspire 1 User Manual
**4. Notice**. Following the Assignment, any notice, demand, request, consent, approval orcommunication that any party hereto desires or is required to give to another party or any otherperson shall be in writing and shall be served in the manner required under the Lease, to thefollowing:       If to ARC: American Reprographics Company, L.L.C.    700 N. Central Avenue, Suite 550    Glendale, CA 91203    Attention: Chief Financial Officer       With a copy (which shall    not constitute notice) to: American Reprographics Company, L.L.C.    1981 N. Broadway, Ste. 385    Walnut Creek, CA 94596    Attention: Legal DepartmentThe undersigned Lessor has executed this Consent as of the date set forth below.           **LESSOR:**             **SUMO Holdings Irvine, LLC**
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2894 

To suspend temporarily the duty on butane, 1-chloro. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on butane, 1-chloro. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BUTANE, 1-CHLORO. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Butane, 1-chloro (CAS No. 

109–69–3) (provided for in 

subheading 2903.19.60) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2894 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Pedro (Pete) P. Rodriguez, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 27, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.

Date: August 5, 2010



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    Pedro (Pete) P. Rodriguez               
|Pedro (Pete) P. Rodriguez                      
|Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Quarterly Report of Interchange Financial Services Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").

The undersigned, Anthony S. Abbate, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Charles T. Field, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


Dated: August 9, 2006

                                        /s/ Anthony S. Abbate
                                        ____________________________________
                                        Anthony S. Abbate
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Charles T. Field
                                        ____________________________________
                                        Charles T. Field
                                        Senior Vice President and CFO
exh1021.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.21

    


    Dividend
and Compensation Arrangements

    


    On February 14, 2007, the Registrant’s
Compensation Committee recommended and the Registrant’s Board of Directors by
unanimous vote of non-employee independent directors resolved that the
below-listed Named Executive Officers will be paid the amounts indicated in the
table below pursuant to the Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan.

    


    
      	
              Executive
      Name and Position

            	 	
              Cash
      Bonus

            	 	 	
              Restricted

              Stock

              Bonus

            	 	 	
              Restricted

              Stock

              Shares

            	 
	
              Stoney
      M. Stubbs, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer

            	 	$	118,611	 	 	$	59,306	 	 	 	6,146	 
	
              S.
      Russell Stubbs, Senior Vice President and Chief Operations
      Officer

            	 	 	60,650	 	 	 	30,325	 	 	 	3,142	 
	
              Thomas
      G. Yetter, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

            	 	 	60,043	 	 	 	30,021	 	 	 	3,111	 


    

    


    


    
      
        
        

      

      
        64 of
71
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, Michael J. Hagan, the Chief Executive Officer of NutriSystem, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /S/ MICHAEL J. HAGAN                
|                       |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Ex Parte Robert

Perez Appellant/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 13, 2014

No. 04-14-00080-CV

EX PARTE Robert PEREZ

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

R ebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On February 10, 2014, relator filed a supplemental petition for writ of habeas corpus. The

court has considered relator’s supplemental petition and is of the opinion that relator is not

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator’s supplemental petition for writ of habeas

corpus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on February 13th, 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13 th day of February, 2014

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006EM502404, styled In the Interest of N.P., et al., Children

, pending in

the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jim Rausch presiding.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0554 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-SW-009-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0785. CHARLIE BRANNER, JR. v. MICHAEL W. GOWEN et al.

Charlie Branner, Jr., filed a mandamus petition seeking to compel the trial court

to schedule a hearing in a criminal matter. The trial court dismissed the petition, and

Branner filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

The relevant factsshow that, in November 2018, Branner pled guilty to several

criminal charges. Shortly thereafter, Branner filed a motion to withdraw his plea, and

he sought appointment of new counsel. In April 2019, Branner filed a pro se

mandamus petition in which he sought to compel the trial court to conduct a hearing

on his motion to withdraw his plea. The mandamus petition was assigned a new civil

case number. The trial court dismissed the petition, and Branner filed a pro se notice

of appeal.

1

Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, any appeal in a civil case that was

initiated by a prisoner must come by discretionary application. See OCGA § 42-12-8;

Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 490 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Because Branner is

incarcerated, he was required to file an application for discretionary appeal in order

to appeal the civil mandamus ruling. See Brock v. Hardman, 303 Ga. 729, 731 (2)

(814 SE2d 736) (2018).

1 The trial court noted that the hearing Branner sought to compel had already

taken place. Branner was represented by appointed counsel at the hearing. The trial

court subsequently denied the motion to withdraw the guilty plea, and the appeal of

this ruling is currently pending as Case Number A20A0424.

December 23, 2019
Although the mandamus petition was given a civil case number, we note that

the issues raised pertained to Branner’s criminal case. To the extent that the petition

may be construed as a criminal rather than a civil matter, Branner’s notice of appeal

is a nullity because he is represented by counsel in his criminal case. See Tolbert v.

Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 363 (3) (767 SE2d 24) (2014) (“A criminal defendant in Georgia

does not have the right to represent himself and also be represented by an attorney,

and pro se filings by represented parties are therefore unauthorized and without

effect.”); Soberanis v. State, 345 Ga. App. 403, 405 (812 SE2d 800) (2018) (notice

of appeal filed by defendant “was a legal nullity”).

For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/23/2019
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 262 

To repeal the excise tax on medical device manufacturers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2011 

Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the excise tax on medical device manufacturers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX. 

4 Subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 1405 of the 

5 Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, 

6 and the amendments made thereby, are hereby repealed; 

7 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied 

8 as if such section and amendments had never been en9 acted. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 262 IS

1 SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF UNSPENT FEDERAL FUNDS TO OFF2 SET LOSS IN REVENUES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, of all available unobligated funds, 

5 $39,000,000,000 in appropriated discretionary funds are 

6 hereby rescinded. 

7 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Director of the Office of 

8 Management and Budget shall determine and identify 

9 from which appropriation accounts the rescission under 

10 subsection (a) shall apply and the amount of such rescis11 sion that shall apply to each such account. Not later than 

12 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

13 Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 

14 submit a report to the Secretary of the Treasury and Con15 gress of the accounts and amounts determined and identi16 fied for rescission under the preceding sentence. 

17 (c) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply to the 

18 unobligated funds of the Department of Defense or the 

19 Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
SERVED : JUN E 4 , 201 0 , . ^

- - . U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH EMATTE RO F FRAN K TERLIZZ I FA A DOCKE T NO . CPI0SO000 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-053 7

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designateda s Cas e No . 2009SO270275 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o th e undersigned . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

^Ronni e A Chie f AdministralSv e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10SO000 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y WilliamR . Byrne , Respondent' s Counse l 92 9 Massachusett s Avenue , Leve l #0 1 Cambridge , MA 0213 9 TEL : 781-856-990 9 Geral dA . Ellis , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Southern Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , GA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e La

w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE12-32 0 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 . -2 -