T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F R AN C I S C A S OF I A C AN O- J OH NS ON , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 71028 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 278- 692 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , a n dG R A B E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . F r a nc i s c aS of

i aC a no- J ohns on, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of H ondur a s , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f

r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f or as ylum , w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and rel i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture



# FI LED JU L 06 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS05- 71028 2 ( “ C A T ” ) . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo q u e s tio n s o f

la w , C er ez o v. Mukasey , 512 F . 3d 1163, 1166 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , e xc e pt t o the e xt e nttha tde f

e r e nc e i s ow e d t o the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on of the gove rni ng s ta tu te s a n dr e g u la tio n s , S im e o n o vv . A s h c r o ft , 37 1 F . 3d 53 2, 53 5 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). W e r e v ie w f

a c tu a l f in d in g s f o rs u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e . Zehat ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1184- 85 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . W e de nyi n pa rta nd di s m i s s i n pa rtthe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatchanged o r e xtra ordi nary c ir c u m s ta n c e s e x c u s e dth e u n tim e lyf ilin g o f C a n o - J o h n s o n ’s a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C .F .R . § § 1 2 0 8 .4 ( a ) ( 4 ) , ( 5 ) ; R am adan v. G on zales , 479 F . 3d 646, 656- 58 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). S u b st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e d en i al o f w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al b ecau se C a no- J ohns on di d notde m ons tr a t e s he w a s orw oul d be s ubj e c t e d t o pe r s e c ut i on b yg a n g m e m b e r s o rp o lic e o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . Se e Santos -L e m us , 5 4 2 F .3 da t 7 4 6 - 4 7 ; Bo l s h a ko vv . I

NS , 133 F . 3d 1279, 1281 ( 9th C i r . 1998) (c ri m i nal stre etgang ac t i vi ty does notes t abl i sh pers ec ut i on on ac coun tof a prot ec t ed grou nd ). S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the de ni a l of C A T r e l i e f

be c aus e C a noJ ohns on f

a i l e d t o pr e s e nte vi de nc e tha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n nots he w i l l be05- 71028 3 t o rtu redb y o r w i th th e co n sen to r acq u i escen ce o f H o n du ran g o v ern m en to ffi ci al s. See Sori an o v. H

older , 56 9 F . 3d 11 62 , 11 67 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew C ano-John son’ s c on t ent i on thatthe IJfa i l ed to c o n s id e rth e d e a th o f h e rm o th e ra n ds ib lin g s b e c au s e s h e d idn o t r a is e th is c la im b e f o r e th e I Jo rB I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.