alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-11-436-E 

September 8, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10354 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0938 

Mr. Kurt Gross 

Wings Air Charter, LLC 

236 Airport Hangar Drive 

Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 

Dear Mr. Gross: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By submission received August 22, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Wings Air Charter, LLC (WAC) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 

14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), to allow WAC, which is operating under separate 

parts of 14 CFR, to cover its safety-sensitive employee under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to WAC. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Wings Air Charter, LLC an exemption from part 120 to 

the extent necessary to allow WAC, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of WAC are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the WAC part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
attestationh1264.htm


Back to Form 8-K




Medicare Advantage Attestation of Benefit Plan


 


WELLCARE OF TEXAS, INC.


 


H1264


 







I attest that I have examined the Plan Benefit Packages (PBPs) identified below and that the benefits identified in the PBPs are those that the above-stated organization will make available to eligible beneficiaries in the approved service area during program year 2012. I further attest that we have reviewed the bid pricing tools (BPTs) with the certifying actuary and have determined them to be consistent with the PBPs being attested to here.


 


I further attest that these benefits will be offered in accordance with all applicable Medicare program authorizing statutes and regulations and program guidance that CMS has issued to date and will issue during the remainder of 2011 and 2012, including but not limited to, the 2012 Call Letter, the 2012 Solicitations for New Contract Applicants, the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual, the Medicare Managed Care Manual, and the CMS memoranda issued through the Health Plan Management System (HPMS).


 



	
Plan


ID

	
Segment 


ID

	
Version

	
Plan Name

	
Plan 


Type

	
Transaction 


Type

	
MA 


Premium

	
Part D 


Premium

	
CMS Approval 


Date

	
Effective 


Date


	
004

	
0

	
7

	
WellCare Value (HMO 


-POS)

	
HMOPOS

	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
0.00

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12


	
007

	
0

	
8

	
WellCare Access 


(HMO SNP)

	
HMO

	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
28.60

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12


	
008

	
0

	
7

	
WellCare Dividend (HMO)

	
HMO

	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
0.00

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12


	
014

	
0

	
7

	
WellCare Dividend (HMO)

	
HMO

	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
0.00

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12







 


 


 


 


 


                                                         





	 	 	 	 H1264





                                                                         












  





  











  








 



 



	
THOMAS TRAN


 

	 	 9/1/2011 10:46:31 AM	 
	
 


Contracting Official Name 

	 	 Date	 





 


 


 


 




	
WELLCARE OF TEXAS, INC.


 

	 	
8735 Henderson Rd


Ren 1 


Tampa, FL 33634


 

	 
	
 


Organization 

	 	
 


Address

	 





                    


 


 


 


 


                                                         


	 	 	 	 H1264
July 1, 2015

Mr. R obert Quinn

Applied Research Associates, In c.

250 B

Randolf, VT 05060

Dear Mr. Quinn :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 26, 2015 , exemption request on behalf of Applied Research Associates,

Inc. into the public docket (No. FAA

- 2015

- 2518 ), but we are unable to process your request

any further. The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you mus t send us all of the

following:

 The specific section or sec tions of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your reques t.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before th e proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-51121

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

THOMAS ANTHONY CHESTNUT, JR., also known as Thomas Anthony 

Chestnut,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:17-CR-70-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Thomas Anthony Chestnut, Jr., has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Chestnut has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 4, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-51121 Document: 00514858469 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2019
No. 17-51121

2

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-51121 Document: 00514858469 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/04/2019
Attendee Report

Webinar Name Webinar ID

Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners Test 

Procedure Proposed Rulemaking: Public 

Meeting and Webinar

926387753

Total Attended

9

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City State Organization Zip Code

James Davis jdavis@islandaire.com US 22 Research Way East Setauket NY Islandaire 11733

James Davis jwdlier@aol.com US 96 Alcolade Dr. E. Shirley NY 11967

Hesham Morten Gabr smg@multi-wing.com SG 415 Tagore Industrial Avenue Singapore Multi-Wing Group 278640

Joanna Mauer jmauer@standardsasap.org US 529 14th St NW Suite 600 Washington DC Appliance Standards Awareness 

Project 20045

Detlef Westphalen detlef.westphalen@navigant.com US 77 South Bedford Street Burlington MA Navigant Consulting, Inc. 01803

Yoolanda Williams yoolanda.williams@ge.com US Appliance Park, AP2-121 Louisville KY GE Appliances 40225

Linda Wilson linda.wilson@ag.ny.gov US 120 Broadway New York NY 10271

Ed Wuesthoff ewuesthoff@friedrich.com US 10001 Reunion Place, Ste 500 San Antonio TX Friedrich Air Conditiong Company 78249

Arshak Zakarian azakarian@energy-solution.com US 1610 Harrison St. Oakland CA Energy Solutions 94612

General Information
From: "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/25/2012 03:53 PM

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the Portland Cement Manufacturing NESHAP and N SPS

-- Proposed Amendments as a Result of Reconsideration Rule

Hi Sharon,

Attached are the handouts from this meeting.

Regards,

Cortney

----- Original Appointment

-----

From: Echols, Mabel E.

Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 2:35 PM

Subject: E.O. 12866 M eeting on the Portland Cement Manufacturing NESHAP and NSPS

-- Proposed

Amendments as a Result of Reconsideration Rule

When: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 1:00 PM

- 1:30 PM (UTC

- 05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building

Thi s meeting was requested by Andrew O’Hare, Portland Cement Association.

(See attached file: 2060AQ93_2012_5_22_PCA_Handout2.pdf)

(See attached file: 2060AQ93_2012_5_22_PCA_Handout1.pdf)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DMITRY SOCHILO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72560

Agency No. A070-568-275

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 9, 2014** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges..

Dmitry Sochilo, a native of the former Soviet Union and citizen of Russia,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his

application for asylum and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed

FILED

DEC 15 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We

dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Sochilo’s contentions regarding alleged

factual errors by the IJ, because he did not raise these contentions before the BIA. 

See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction

to consider issues that have not been administratively exhausted).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that the harm

Sochilo experienced did not rise to the level of past persecution, and that he does

not have an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution. See Prasad v. INS,

47 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th Cir. 1995). Thus, Sochilo’s asylum claim fails. See id. at

340. 

Because Sochilo failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily

failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See

Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190. 

Finally, we reject Sochilo’s challenge to the agency’s country of removal

designation, because the record supports the agency’s determination that Russia is

the appropriate country of removal.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part. 

2 12-72560
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2928 

To suspend temporarily the duty on helvetolide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on helvetolide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HELVETOLIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-(1-(3′,3′-dimethyl-1′- 

cyclohexyl)ethoxy)-2-methyl 

propyl propanoate 

(helvetolide) (CAS No. 

141773–73–1) (provided for 

in subheading 2915.50.50) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2928 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  Report of  Saratoga  Resources,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Dated:  July 8, 2005                           /s/ Thomas Cooke
                                               ______________________________
                                               Name: Thomas Cooke
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  July 8, 2005                           /s/ Thomas Cooke
                                               ______________________________
                                               Name: Thomas Cooke
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer
RU G 0 6 '1 0 19:1 2 F R CflNPDIfl N TRPN S fiGENCY819 99 4 028 9 TO 1202366369 4 P.01/0 1 Offic e j^^^ ^

Canadia n de s transport s «|MM|E rTransportatio n d u Canad a WKf^lB y Agenc y Augus t 6,201 0 M4820'U5-1 9 B Y FACSIMIL

E Mr . Paul Gretch Director Offic e o f Internationa

l Aviatio n U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n X40 , suit e 640 2 40 0 7t h Street S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Mr , Gretc h Reference : OS T 2006-2426 9 Thi s lette r confirm s tha

t th e Canadia

n Transportatio n Agenc y consider s application s b y U S ai r carrier s fo r approva l to operat e charter s to and fromCanada , includin g charter s between Canada an d thir d countries , i n accordanc e wit h th e provision s of

th e Ai r Transpor t Agreemen

t Between Canadaand th e Unite d State s o f America , signed March 12,200 7 and , a s establishe d i n th e Agreemen t fo r thos e charter s no t

specified i n th e Annex t o tha t Agreement , on the basi s o f comit y and reciprocity . "V^^ ^ j^incerel y / j ^therin e MacDonald Manage r Internationa

l Agreements , Divisio n B

c c Rober

t Ready , AN

A Mar c Rioux , ACEA . Bria n Hedberg , U S Do T

Ottaw a (Ontario ) K1 A 0N 9 Ottaw a Ontari o K1 A 0N 9

www.otc.gc.c a www.cta.gc.c a 

# Canad a * * TOTfi L PfiGE.0 1 * *
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00573

- CV

Amelia SKRZ Y CKI

, Appellant

v.

Shirley B. WRIGHT

, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 2419

- CV Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Shirley B. Wright, recover her costs of this appeal

f rom appellant, Amelia Skrzycki.

SIGNED June 27, 2018.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roubik Gregorian, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.

Date: February 7, 2007



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Roubik Gregorian                           
|Roubik Gregorian                               
|Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 309 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 309

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to the products of Moldova.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2011

  Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Kerry, Mr. McCain, Mrs. Hagan, and Mr. 
    Cardin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to the products of Moldova.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 
              1974 TO THE PRODUCTS OF MOLDOVA.

    (a) Presidential Determinations and Extension of Nondiscriminatory 
Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Trade Act 
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may--
            (1) determine that the denial of nondiscriminatory 
        treatment should no longer apply to the products of Moldova; 
        and
            (2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to Moldova, proclaim the extension of nondiscriminatory 
        treatment (normal trade relations treatment) to the products of 
        Moldova.
    (b) Termination of Applicability of Title IV.--On and after the 
date on which the President extends nondiscriminatory treatment to the 
products of Moldova pursuant to subsection (a), title IV of the Trade 
Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to Moldova.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Platinum SuperYachts, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James N. Rodgers, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\           James N. RodgersJames N. RodgersPresident and CEO

November 6, 2002

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3007 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3007

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,1,2-2-tetrafluoroethylene, 
                    oxidized, polymerized, reduced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,1,2-2-tetrafluoroethylene, 
                    oxidized, polymerized, reduced.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,1,2-2-TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED, REDUCED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      1,1,2-2-            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Tetrafluoroethyle                                                  31/2015.......
                        ne, oxidized,
                        polymerized,
                        reduced (CAS No.
                        69991-62-4)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3402.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```