alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000753557
<NAME>                                         LBO Capital Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                               37
<SECURITIES>                                     49,858
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 49,895
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   49,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           628,117
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          1,210
<OTHER-SE>                                     (579,432)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     49,895
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               40,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (42,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (42,414)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.00)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6817

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY DEAN CURLEE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-99-182, CA-02-151) Submitted: August 21, 2003 Decided: September 16, 2003 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Dean Curlee, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rodney Dean Curlee seeks to appeal the district court’s order and judgment adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order and judgment is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Curlee has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,369]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 25, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Ethan Allen Operations, Inc., Case Goods Division, Andover, Maine. Workers at the subject firm manufacture wood furniture.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-8929 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Alex Smid, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and director of Southridge Environmental Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Southridge Environmental Inc. for the year ended August 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Southridge Environmental Inc. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Dated: December 12, 2006 |   |          |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------|
|                     |   |          |
|                     |   |          |
|                     |   | /s/ Alex Smid |   |  
 

 

Alex Smid

 

 

President and Director

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

Southridge Environmental Inc.

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Southridge Environmental Inc. and will be retained by Southridge Environmental Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

  |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3008 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3008

     To reduce temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing 
                   Clothianidin and Bacillus Firmus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing 
                   Clothianidin and Bacillus Firmus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRODUCT MIXTURES CONTAINING CLOTHIANIDIN AND BACILLUS 
              FIRMUS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Product mixtures    4.2%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        containing                                                         31/2015.......
                        Clothianidin: (E)-
                        N-[(2-chloro-1,3-
                        thiazol-5-
                        yl)methyl]-N-
                        methyl
                        [oxido(oxo)hydraz
                        ono]
                        methanediamine or
                        N-[(2-chloro-1,3-
                        thiazol-5-yl)
                        methyl]-N-{(E)-
                        (methylamino)
                        [oxido(oxo)
                        hydrazono]methyl}
                        amine (CAS No.
                        210880-92-5), and
                        Bacillus Firmus:
                        BAFI I-1582
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3808.91.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Jimmy Lee CASTANOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4380

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Alexandra K. Galvin, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jimmy Castanos appeals his convictions for robbery with a weapon, battery upon a person sixty-five years or older, and false imprisonment. Castanos raises one issue on appeal: the trial court's refusal to allow re-cross examination of the victim. We affirm.

We review the trial court's limitation of re-cross examination for an abuse of discretion. *See**Sandoval v. State*, 198 So.3d 926, 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Castanos sought to re-cross the victim regarding the victim's testimony about the length of his interview with the police.

The victim's testimony, including direct, cross, and re-direct examinations, was lengthy.1 On cross-examination, defense counsel introduced into evidence the victim's taped interview with the police regarding the incident. Counsel used the interview to point out that the victim's trial testimony contained several details that he did not tell the police during the interview. On re-direct, the prosecutor established that the victim had been on the stand "for hours," while the victim indicated that the police interview lasted approximately three or four minutes; therefore, the victim was able to provide more details from the incident at trial. Specifically, the victim testified, "Yes, I have, I only had three minutes to talk to the police and you've been grilling me for hours here."

The defense subsequently sought to conduct re-cross examination of the victim for impeachment purposes because the actual length of the interview contradicted the victim's testimony and no one restricted the length of time he spoke to the police. The trial court denied the defense's request, stating "You can cover that in argument. The foundation [is] in there, everything is there."

Because the State did not elicit "any new matter on re-direct, but only a detail which had been addressed in cross-examination," we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court declining to allow re-cross examination of the victim. *See**Hurst v. State*, 825 So.2d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). To the extent that Castanos wished to give the victim's testimony regarding the length of the interview a literal meaning, the interview was played at trial and admitted into evidence. Thus, its length had been established.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

1

The majority of the victim's testimony occurred during cross-examination.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

March 1, 2013

ERRATA

______________________ 

2012-5033

CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. 

 

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims

______________________ 

Decided: February 27, 2013

Nonprecedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following addition: 

Page 2, add “J. David Breemer, Pacific Legal Foundation, 

of Sacramento, California, for amicus curiae Pacific Legal 

Foundation”.
EXHIBIT 99.11



CONSENT OF GRAHAM HOLMES



Reference is made to the technical report
entitled “Caspiche Project, Copiapo, Chile, NI 43-101 Technical Report Caspiche Pre-Feasibility Study” dated January
16, 2012, which contains certain scientific and technical information related to the Caspiche property of Exeter Resource Corporation
(the “Technical Report”).



I hereby consent to the inclusion of references
to my name and references to, and information derived from, the Technical Report, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Exeter
Resource Corporation, which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



Dated this 30th day of March, 2012.



|/s/ Graham Holmes             | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Name:  Graham Holmes, P. Eng. |
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
 
 As independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the reference of our name in the Form 10K for the year ending December 31, 2005 of PDC 2004D (the “Partnership”). We have no interest of a substantial or material nature in the Partnership or in any affiliate. We have not been employed on a contingent
basis, and we are not connected with the Partnership or any affiliate as a promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, employee, or affiliate.
 
 
 /s/ D. Randall WrightBy:
D. Randall WrightPresident
 
 Wright & Company, Inc.
 Brentwood, Tennessee
 July 20, 2009
Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Sheet.



 EXHIBIT 10.8 
 Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Sheet 
  

				
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	35,000.00
		
	 Type of Meeting
	  	Amount Paid per Meeting
	 Board Meeting
	  	$	3,500.00
	 Special Meeting
	  	$	3,500.00
	 Telephonic Board Meeting
	  	$	1,000.00
	 Compensation & Nominating Committee Meeting
	  	$	1,500.00
	 Audit Committee Meeting
	  	$	3,000.00
	 Executive Committee Meeting
	  	$	3,500.00
	 Additional Fee for Chairperson (except Audit)
	  	$	1,500.00
	 Additional Fee for Audit Committee Chairperson
	  	$	2,000.00
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      11,291,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,409,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 38,575,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      39,546,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        13,202,000
<LOANS>                                    438,256,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,188,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             534,238,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 336,906,000
<SHORT-TERM>                               114,044,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         25,663,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 20,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,699,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,926,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             534,238,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             27,764,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,331,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               508,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            30,603,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          12,278,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,751,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,852,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  715,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              37,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             22,085,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,329,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,329,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,348,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.70
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,026,939
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,678,590
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               710,472
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,182,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  739,407
<RECOVERIES>                                    30,679
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,188,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,188,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
rrd198963_23645.html


Exhibit 10.1 March 11, 2008

PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL
Michael D. Lockhart
Executive Office
Subject:  Notice of Stock Option Adjustments
Dear Mike,
On February 19, 2007, you received the following Stock Option grant under the Company's 2006 Long-
Term Incentive Plan.  
Stock Option Grant
        Exercise Price - $52.38 per share
        Number of Shares        Date Exercisable
        23,360        February 19, 2008
        21,090        February 19, 2009
        19,650        February 19, 2010
        64,100
Under the terms of the Plan, the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board 
of Directors is required to make equitable adjustments to Stock Option grants if there is a change in the 
capital structure of the Company.  As a result of the $4.50 special cash dividend declared by the Board of 
Directors on February 25, 2008, your Stock Option grant has been adjusted.  The exercise price has been 
reduced by $12.50 per share.  Your grant is now as follows:
Adjusted Grant
        Exercise Price - $39.88 per share
        Number of Shares        Date Exercisable
        23,360        February 19, 2008
        21,090        February 19, 2009
        19,650        February 19, 2010
        64,100
                        
All other terms and conditions of your Stock Option grant are unchanged.  You should file this Notice of 
Stock Option Adjustments with your original grant documents.
Please call Scott Webster if you have questions.

Sincerely,
  /s/ Donald A. McCunniff        
Donald A. McCunniff
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 77 (Thursday, April 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Office of the Secretary


Solicitation of Input From Stakeholders on the Roadmap for 
Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension

AGENCY: Research, Education, and Economics Office, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of public comment period for written stakeholder input; 
second correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Research, Education, and Extension Office (REEO) of the 
Research, Education, and Economics (REE) Mission Area of the Department 
of Agriculture published a document in the Federal Register on April 1, 
2009, concerning written stakeholder input on the preparation of a 
roadmap for the REEO. The document contained an incorrect word in the 
background and purpose section which is listed under the supplementary 
information section of the notice. The correction notice was published 
on April 10, 2009. However, the correction notice still contained an 
incorrect word in the background and purpose section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Simmons, 202-720-1777.

Second Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 10, 2009, in FR Doc. E9-7252, on 
page 14768, in the fifth column, correct section to read as follows:

Background and Purpose

    The preparation of the roadmap for agricultural research, 
education, and extension is mandated in section 7504 of the Food, 
Conservation, and Energy Act (FCEA) of 2008, (Pub. L. 110-246, U.S.C. 
7614a). The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Research, 
Education, and Economics (Under Secretary), will prepare the Roadmap.

    Dated: April 16, 2009.
Yvette Anderson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer for Agriculture Research Service.
[FR Doc. E9-9201 Filed 4-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M