alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2683 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2683

   To suspend temporarily the duty on ion exchange resin of benzene, 
    diethenyl, polymer, with ethnylbenzene and ethenylethylbenzene, 
              chloromethylated, trimethylaminoquaternized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on ion exchange resin of benzene, 
    diethenyl, polymer, with ethnylbenzene and ethenylethylbenzene, 
              chloromethylated, trimethylaminoquaternized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN OF BENZENE, DIETHENYL, POLYMER, WITH 
              ETHNYLBENZENE AND ETHENYLETHYLBENZENE, CHLOROMETHYLATED, 
              TRIMETHYLAMINOQUATERNIZED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Ion exchange resin  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        of benzene,                                                        31/2015.......
                        diethenyl,
                        polymer, with
                        ethnylbenzene and
                        ethenylethylbenze
                        ne,
                        chloromethylated,
                        trimethylaminoqua
                        ternized (CAS No.
                        69011-19-4)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3914.00.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
William Joseph WALTERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-2093

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPOTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, James C. Mroczkowski, Chief Financial Officer of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
 
 (1) The Quarterly Report of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.
 /s/ James C. Mroczkowski
 --------------------------------------
 Name: James C. Mroczkowski
 Title: Chief Financial Officer
 Date: November 13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the quarter ended February 28,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                  1,823
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                           7,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,930
<PP&E>                                 13,215
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         22,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     153
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             22,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           22,584
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          832
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           581
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       581
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              581
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.64
        

</TABLE>
FIRST COMMUNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Nizardo Pablo CAPESTANY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 3D17-900

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Huebler, 128 Nev. „ 275 P.3d 91, 96 (2012), cert. denied, 568 U.S.

, 133 S. Ct. 988 (2013). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.



## f\4 J4 LE Hardesty

cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Humboldt County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk J.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3020 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Permethrin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Permethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.80 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Permethrin) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 77A/5 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 77A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 585 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 77A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 585 March 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 077A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/130/14 — Assistants (AST 3) in the buildings sector | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2015/C 077A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/130/14 — Assistants (AST 3) in the buildings sector

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to
18 United States Code s. 1350

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Manulife Financial Corporation (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 9, 2017                                     
|                                                           
|/s/ Stephen B. Roder                                       
|Stephen B. Roder                                           
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 201 5

- 4212 Directorate Identifier: 

### 201 5

- NM

- 010

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Revise

maintenance/inspec

tion program 1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 

### 4 $ 340.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 340



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$8 5/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analys is ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant reg ulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Expla nation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No an swer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.4.2

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                            SHIP MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

                                 April 11, 2005

            Reference is hereby made to the Ship Management Agreement, dated
October 20, 2004 (the "Ship Management Agreement"), between Companion Ltd., a
company incorporated in the Islands of Bermuda (the "Owners") and Northern
Marine Management Ltd., a company incorporated in Scotland (the "Managers").
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
to them in the Time Charter.

            The Owners and the Managers hereby agree that the provisions of the
Ship Management Agreement shall be amended as follows:

            1. The schedule set forth in Clause 21 shall be deleted and replaced
      by the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    "Period                                    Management Fee
<S>                                                            <C>
1  (Effective date stated in Box 4 - November 10, 2005)            $ 5,750
2  (November 11, 2005 - November 10, 2006)                         $ 6,038
3  (November 11, 2006 - November 10, 2007)                         $ 6,339
4  (November 11, 2007 - November 10, 2008)                         $ 6,656
5  (November 11, 2008 - November 10, 2009)                         $ 6,989
Option 1 (November 11, 2009 - November 10, 2010)                   $ 7,339
Option 2 (November 11, 2010 - November 10, 2011)                   $ 7,706
Option 3 (November 11, 2011 - November 10, 2012)                   $ 8,091"
</TABLE>

      This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of England. Except as provided herein, the Ship Management Agreement shall
remain unchanged.

      OWNERS                                  MANAGERS

      Companion Ltd.                          Northern Marine Management Ltd.

      By: /s/ Arthur L. Regan                 By: /s/ Mats Berglund
          -------------------                     -----------------
      Name: Arthur L. Regan                   Name: Mats Berglund
      Title: President and CEO                Title: Director
J. 

## 1 Pickering

---- Parraguirre

---- "r J. Saitta work is not an appealable decision. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

cc: Hon. Miriam Shearing, Senior Judge Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge Charles H. Hill Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'We have considered the documents received in this matter, and we deny relief as this appeal is being dismissed.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
EXHIBIT 31.1

     I, Anthony M. Marlon, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of Sierra Health Services, Inc. certify that:

     1.	     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Health Services, Inc.;

     2.	     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.	     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.	     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	          a)	     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	          b)	     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	          c)	     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	          a)	     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

	          b)	     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 6, 2003	

  
By: /s/ Anthony M. Marlon, M.D.
EX-10.2






NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC.




AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN GRANT AGREEMENTS




WHEREAS, restricted stock grant agreements dated as of July 1, 2005, September 7, 2005, July
14, 2006 and July 2, 2007 (the “Agreements”) were entered into by and between Nastech
Pharmaceutical Company Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, and Bruce R. York (the
“Grantee”); and



WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Agreements and the Grantee wishes to do the same;



NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned do hereby agree that the following sentence shall be added at
the end of Section 1.3 of each of the Agreements:



Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, if there is any conflict
between the provisions of this Agreement and the employment agreement entered into by the Grantee
and Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. effective as of March 7, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”),
the provisions of the Employment Agreement shall control.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed these Amendments effective as of March 7, 2008.



	 	 	 
	Company:

	 	NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC.

By: /s/ Steven C. Quay
	
 
	 	 
	
 
	 	Name: Steven C. Quay, M.D., Ph.D.

Title: Chief Executive Officer
	Grantee:

	 	/s/ Bruce R. York
	
 
	 	 
	
 
	 	Name: Bruce R. York

Title: Chief Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2982 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Neononyl Acetate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Neononyl Acetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEONONYL ACETATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 3,5,5–trimethylhexyl acetate 

(CAS No. 58430–94–7) (provided for in subheading 

2915.39.4550) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2982 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Lorge, principal accounting officer of AAA Energy, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AAA Energy,
Inc., for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of AAA Energy, Inc.


/s/ David Lorge
------------------------------------
Dennis LaPrairie
Principal Accounting Officer
October 29, 2007
# Official Journal L 285/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 285 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5920 October 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 285

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5920 October 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 67 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the I. Approval of specific equipment of vehicles of category M and N using liquefied petroleum gases in their propulsion system; II. Approval of vehicles of category M and N fitted with specific equipment for the use of liquefied petroleum gases in their propulsion system with regard to the installation of such equipment [2016/1829] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 67 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the I. Approval of specific equipment of vehicles of category M and N using liquefied petroleum gases in their propulsion system; II. Approval of vehicles of category M and N fitted with specific equipment for the use of liquefied petroleum gases in their propulsion system with regard to the installation of such equipment [2016/1829]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.