# AIR MONITORING, INC.

9548-D Mt. Holly H1111tersv/lle Road • H1111tersvil/e 1 NC 28078 www./lllegrltyalr.llel


# STATIONARY SOURCE SAMPLING REPORT 

# FOR FLORIMUSA CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE
Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet & 

# Exhaust S0 2 , 

# HCl 

# & HF Sampling Integrity Project No. 08-100 Performed: November 18, 2008

Certified By:



### --------Date

__ _ James A. Lewis, QSTI Vice President Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc. 

### ------- Date

__ _ J.A. Tony Blanton, QSTI 

### President Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc.Stntionmy Source Sampling Report, Florim USA Ki/11 No. 1 Baghousc l11let & Exhaust 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS Ja11uary 8, 2009 l11tegrily Project No. 08-100



### 1.0 

### INTRODUCTION .....••••..•...•.•••••••.•••..........................•..............................•..•.....•..................... 3 1.1 Purpose

................................................................................................................................ 3 

### 1.2 Outline of Test Program

...................................................................................................... 3 Table 1 -Target Pollutants and Reference Methods

......................................................... 3 1.3 

### Test Participants

.................................................................................................................. 4 Table 

### 2

- Test Participants

................................................................................................. 4 

## 2. 0 'RESULTS •.•..•.•••.••...••••••.•••••••••••••••.•••••••••..•.•..•••••••.•...•••.. .....••...•••...••.•.•....•.•..•••.•.•........•••..••.••• 

## 5 2.1 Summary of Results

............................................................................................................ 5 Table 3- Summary ofResults

............................................................................................ 5 

### 2.2 Discussion

........................................................................................................................... 5 

### 3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ••••••••••••••.•.•••••••••••.•.•.••.•••••.•.•.•.•••.•••••••••••.•.•....••••••••...••.•••......•.••.. 

## 6 3 

### .1 Air Pollution Control Equipment

........................................................................................ 6 3 .2 Demonstration of Operating Rate

....................................................................................... 6 

### 4.0 

### SAMPLING METHODS •••...••..•.•..••.•.•........•••••..•..••..•••••.•.•.••••••••••••••.•..••••..•.••.•.•....••••.•••...••..• 7 4.1 Sampling Strategy

............................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures

.................................................................................. 7 Table 4 - Sampling and Analytical Procedures

.................................................................. 7 4.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points and Cyclonic Flow Determination

......................................................................................................... 7 4.2.2 Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination

............................. 8 4.2.3 Dry Molecular Weight Determination

................................................................... 8 4.2.4 Moisture Determination

......................................................................................... 8 4.2.5 Sulfur Dioxide Sampling and Analysis

.................................................................. 8 4.2.6 Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride Sampling and Analysis

.................................................................................................................. 9 4.2.7 Sampling Ports and Points

................................................................................... 

### 10 Figure 1 - Baghouse Inlet Location of Sampling Ports

................................................... 

### 11 Figure 

### 2
- Baghouse Exhaust Location of Sampling Ports

.............................................. 12 

### 4.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

............................................................................ 

### 13 Table 6- Project QA Activities and Results

.................................................................... l3 

### 5.0 

### APPENDICES ...•...•••••••.•.•••...•••....•••••..•..•..•.••.••..........•.•.....•••.•.••.•...••...••••...•.••........••.........•.•. 14 

### 1. Detailed Summary ofResults and Example Calculations 2. Field Data Sheets 3. Laboratory Documentation 4. Calibration Documentation 5. Facility Production Documentation

/NTJ-:GR/11' AIR MONITORING, INC. Pnge2Slationmy Source Sampling Report, Florim USA Kiln No. J Bagllouse inlet & Exllat1st 

## 1.0 INTRODUCTION Jamlm)' 8, 2009 llllegriry Project No. 08-JOO



### This test program was performed at the Florim USA facility in Clarksville, Tennessee. This section of the report describes the test purpose and provides a brief outline of the test activities and the personnel involved in the test program.


## 1.1 Purpose The purpose ofthe test was to quantify sulfur dioxide (80 2 ), 

### hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) emissions associated with the baghouse serving Kiln No. 1. The sampling was not required by the facility air pennit, but will be used for future air permit modifications.



## 1.2 Outline of Test Program Integrity Air Monitoting, fuc. (Integrity) performed stationary source sampling at the Kiln No. 1 baghouse inlet and exhaust on November 18, 2008. The sampling included three 1-hour sampling runs for the target pollutants. The following table provides the target pollutants and United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) reference methods used in the test program.



## Table 1 -Target Pollutants and Reference Methods Pollutant Reference Method 802 6 HCI&HF 

### 26

In addition to the sampling performed for the target pollutants, Integrity also performed US EPA Reference Methods 1 through 4 to determine the location of the sampling points, the volumehic flow rate, the molecular weight of the stack gas and the moisture content, respectively.

INmGRJT>' AIR MONITORING, INC. Page3Statiollm)l Source Sampliug Report, Florim USA Ki/11 No. I Bnghouse /u/et & Ex/must



## 1.3 Test Participants The following table provides contact information for the test participants.



### Table 2- Test Participants 

## Name Title Affiliation
James A. Lewis Vice President Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc.

Andrew J. Dickson Sampling Technician Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc.

E.W. "Rusty" Caton lV Sampling Technician Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc.

Connie Smith Environmental Health Florim USA and Safety Administrator
Amy B. Spann, PE, CHMM Engineer Bnsafc

Jonathan Bradley Environmental TDEC Specialist

INTEGRJT}' AIR MONITORING, INC. Jammry 8, 2009 l11tegrity Project No. 08-/00



### .Contact Info Telephone: (704) 398-1119 Facsimile: (704) 398-1113 jim@integrityair.net Telephone: (704) 398-1119 Facsimile: (704) 398-1113

andrew@integrityair .net Telephone: (704) 398-1119 Facsimile: (704) 398-1113

rusty@integrityair .net Telephone: (931) 553-7500 Facsimile: (931) 647-9934

cjames@florimusa.com Telephone: (615) 255-9300 Facsimile: (615) 255-9345 aspann@ensafe.com Telephone: (615) 532-9195 Facsimile: (615) 532-0614**jonathan.bradley@state.~.us**

Page4Stal;onary Source Sampling Report, Florim USA Kll11 No. I Baglwu.te Inlet & Exhaust



## 2.0 RESULTS January 8, 2009 llllegrity Project No. 08-/00



### This section presents the mean sampling results. Detailed sampling results for each sampling run and example calculations are presented in Appendix 1. Field data sheets and system bias and drift checks are presented in Appendix 2. Data acquisition system uncorrected values and values corrected for system bias
are presented in Appendix 3. Laboratory documentation is presented in Appendix 4.



### 2.1 Summary of Results The following table presents the mean results from the sampling performed at the Kiln No. I Baghouse on November 18,2008.



### Pollutant Loading Rate, Emission Rate, 0 

### /o Removal lb!hr lb/hr 

### Efficiency (RE) 

## so2 6.53 5.82 10.9 

### HCI 2.97 2.20 25.9 

### HF 1.67 <0.016 >99.0



## 2.2 Discussion Florim USA will use the results from this test program to demonstrate compliance with air quality permit limitations, and for possible future air permit modifications.

INTEGRJT>' AIR MONITORING, INC. Page5Stntioll(rry Source Sampling Report, Florim USA Kiln No. J Bngllouse /11/et & Exhaust



### 3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION This section contains a brief description of the process and related control·equipment. Jrmunry 8, 2009 Integrity Project No. 08-100



### The Florim USA facility located in Clarksville, Tennessee produces ceramic tile. 

### Raw tile body materials (e.g., clay, silica, calcium carbonate) are shipped to the facility and stored in the raw materials storage building. Body materials are mixed with water and blended in the ball mills; the blended, wet body material

- which is referred to as "slip"

- is stored/cured in tanks, and then piped to one of the three {3) spray dryers, which process the material into dried "priUs". Prill is next pressed into tile shapes, and dried in natural gas-frred vertical dryers. A wet glaze- mixed 

## in the glaze preparation area- is then applied to some of the unfinished tiles (a.k.a. "greenware"). Glazed greenware is next processed in natural gas-fired horizontal dryers, and stored along with unglazed greenware in "B & T" carts. All greenware is fired in one of the natural gas-fired kilns, en1issions from which are controlled via a lime injection baghouse. Finished tile is then sorted, packaged and shipped to the customer or supplier.

The tlu·ee lime injection baghouses control emissions from five (5) kilns with Kilns #6 and #7 (Source 63-0135-09) 

### ducted to one baghouse, Kilns #8 

### and #9 

### (Source 63-0135-09) 

### ducted to
one baghouse, and the new K.iln #1 

### (Source 63-0135-30) 

### ducted to a single baghouse. The lime feeds at a constant rate as designed by the manufacturer, Eurofilter, and each baghouse is equipped with a pressure drop gauge. Eurofilter is able to monitor baghouse operations and perform diagnostics on the unit remotely and the units are on a routine preventative maintenance schedule.


## 3.1 Air Pollution Control Equipment Emissions from the kiln are controlled by a lime-injected baghouse.



## 3.2 Demonstration of Operating Rate Process and control device operating parameters corresponding with the sampling were recorded by 

### Florim USA and Ensafe personnel. This documentation is included in Appendix 5.

INTF.GRITI' AIR MONJmR!NO, INC. Pnge6Stationary Source Sampling Report, Florim USA Kiln No. I Bagllouse /ulet & Exhaust January 8, 2009 flllegrlty Project No. 08-JOO



## 4.0 SAMPLING METHODS This section describes the sampling strategy, sampling and analytical methods, and the quality assurance/quality control pr.ocedures implemented during this project.



## 4.1 Sampling Strategy The sampling and analytical procedures used during this test program were those established by the US EPA and State Regulatory Agency. A Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) detailing the sampling procedures and process parameters to be followed during this test program was submitted to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation prior to sampling.



## 4.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures The following table provides the US EPA reference methods used in this sampling program.



## Table 4 - Sampling and Analytical Procedures Reference Method Parameter 1 

### Location of Sampling Points 2 Volumetric Flow Rate 

### 3 Molecular Weight, 0 2 

### and C0 2 

### Content 

### 4 Moisture Content 6**s~** 

### 26 HCl&HF

A sampling and analysis synopsis for each of these methods is discussed briefly in the following subsections. These test methods are available in the Code of Federal Regulations Volume 

### 40, Part 

### 60 or by request from Integrity.



## 4.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points and Cyclonic Flow Determination The sampling locations were prepared according to the critelia in Method 1. The duct diameters upstream and downstream from the sampling ports were measured and documented prior to sampling. The number of traverse points was chosen 

### with respect to sampling port location. The amount of cyclonic flow was determined according to the criteria detailed in Method 1.

INTEGRJn' AIR MONITORING, iNC. Page 7Stalfonary Source Sampling Report, Florim USA Ki/11 No. I Bog!Jouse lnlel & Ex/must 

## 4.2.2 Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination JnmmtJ' 8, 2009 l11tegrily Pro}ecl No. 08-100



### Method 2 is used to determine the average gas velocity in a stack using the average temperature and average velocity head. The temperature is measured with a calibrated thermocouple and the velocity determined with a TypeS (Stausscheibe) pitot tube. This method is further used to calculate the volumetric flow rate.

Measurements of velocity head and temperature at the sampling location were performed at the traverse points specified by Method 1. 

### An inclined oil manometer or calibrated magnehelic gauge was used to
measure the differential pressure.
The apparatus was set-up according to manufacturer and reference method reconunendations. Pre-test and post-test leak checks were conducted for each sampling run. The atmospheric and static pressure of the stack was also determined for each set of velocity head readings. The volumetric flow rate calculations used

were those specified in Method 2.



## 4.2.3 Dry 

## Molecular Weight Determination Method 3 is applicable for determining carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations and dry molecular weight of a sample from a gas stream of a fossil-fuel combustion process. This method may also be applicable to other processes where it has been determined that compounds other than carbon dioxide, oxygen, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen are not present in concentrations sufficient to affect the results.

Since the sources were emitting essentially air, a molecular weight of 29.0 was used at each location according to Method 2, Section 8.6.



## 4.2.4 Moisture Determination Method 4 was used to determine the stack gas moistw·e content The moisture content is used to correct the concentration or mass emission rate to a dry 

### basis. Moisture determinations for this sampling project were detennined in conjunction with the 

### 80 2 

### sampling. This procedure is**discuss~d** 

### in Section 4.2.5.



## 4.2.5 Sulfur Dioxide Sampling and Analysis Sampling and analysis for 

### 80 2 

### was performed according to US EPA Method 6. The principal components of the sampling system were sequentially:

• A heated (248°F ±25°F) glass probe with a plug of glass wool as a filter;

!NT/WRIT>' AIR MoNnORJNG, INC. Page8Stationary• Source Snmpli11g Report, F/orim USA Kiln No. I Bngltouse Inlet & Exhaust Jn11unry 8, 2009 Integrity Project No. 08-100



### • An impinger train consisting of four sequential impingers. The first impinger containing 100 ml of 80% IP A followed by two impingers each containing 100 

### m1 of 3% hydrogen peroxide and a final impinger containing 200 grams of silica gel; and

• A metering system capable of maintaining a constant sampling rate and accurately determining the sample volume according to those specifications in APID-0581.
The liquid in the first impinger was measured to the nearest milliliter and discarded. The moisture collected in impingers two and three was measured to the nearest milliliter and placed in a HDPE sample container. The moisture collected by the silica gel in the fourth impinger was determined to the nearest 0.1 gram. The collected condensate measurements were recorded on the corresponding field data sheet. hnpingers two and three and connecting glassware were rinsed with deionized water and the rinses were added to the HDPE sample container. The sample was diluted to 1000 

## ml as specified in Method 8. All sample containers were sealed and the liquid leve]s were marked. The sample containers were transported to Integrity's Air Quality Laboratory in Huntersville, North Carolina.

The sulfur dioxide samples were analyzed by the barium-thorin titration method. A sulfur dioxide audit sample was analyzed along with the samples. The laboratory analyses and chain of custody documentation
are included in Appendix 3.



## 4.2.6 Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride Sampling and Analysis Sampling for hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride was performed according to Method 26 procedures. The principal components of the sampling system were sequentially: 

## * A heated (248°F ±25°F) borosilicate glass probe; 

# * A heated (248°F ±25°F) Teflon filter assembly with a Teflon filter; 

## *

* A mini-impinger train consisting of four sequential impingers. lmpingers one and two contained 15 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute sulfuric acid (O.lN H2S04). Impinger three contained 15 ml of dilute sodium hydroxide (O.lN NaOH) followed by a final impinger containing 15 grams of silica gel; and A metering system capable of maintaining a constant sampling rate and accurately determining the sample volume according to those specifications in APTD-0581.
Sample clean-up began immediately after each test run. Hydrogen chloride was collected in the O.IN sulfuric acid solution in impingers one and two. The impingers were each weighed separately to the nearest gram. The liquid in the first two impingers was placed in a 125ml HDPE storage container along with the

INTEGRI11' AIR MONITORiNG, INC. Pnge9Station my Source Sampling Report, Florim USA Ki/11 No. I Bngllouse /11/et & Exhaust Jmmmy 8, 2009 /nteg1ify Project No. 08-100 

### deionized water rinse of the impingers and connectjng glassware. The container was sealed with Teflon tape and the liquid level was marked.

The 0.1 N sodium hydroxide solution in impinger three was used as a scrubber to protect the sampling console. The impinger was weighed to the nearest gram and the contents were discarded. The silica gel impinger was also weighed to the nearest gram and then reloaded.

The samples and chain of custody were shipped to Element One Laboratory in Wilmington, North Carolina where they were analyzed by Ion Chromatography. The laboratory results are included in Appendix 3.



### 4.2. 7 Sampling Ports and Points The dimensions of the sampling locations and the location of the sampling ports and points are detailed in Figures 1 and 2. The drawings provided are not to scale.

INTF.aRJTY AIR MONITORING, INC:. Page 10Stntionm)' Source Sampling Report, Flo1im USA Ki/11 No. I Bagllouse btlet & Exhaust 

# Baghouse Inlet

39"

Sampling Ports



# 0 B Jamuuy 8, 2009 Jmegrity Project No. 08-/00



# ~u-----------------------------------------------------------------------~ 54" 126"



# Figure 1 Location of Sampling Ports

INTEGRITY AIR MONITORING, INC. Page IIStationary Source Sampling Report. Florim USA Ki/11 No. I Bngltouse /11/et & Exhaust



# t

>86.5

# -1~

216" 

# l1

# ~ Baghouse Exhaust

4


# 0 

# /**~**

## ~------- 

# r
Figure 2
Location of Sampling Ports

INTEGRITI' AIR MONITORING, INC. A

Fan Jammry 8. 2009 lmegrily Project No. 08-100

8

Page 12Stationary Source Sampling Report. Florlm USA Kiln No. J Bag/rouse Inlet & E.\·lraust 

### 4.3 

### Quality Assurance and 

### Quality Control Jammry 8, 2009 l11tegr/ty Project No. 08-100



### Integrity Air has established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) guidelines to ensure the highest quality sampling and analytical data from source tests.

Data quality objectives were maintained throughout this project. The following table provides the QA activities followed during this sampling project and the results.



### Table 6 -Project QA Activities and Results Parameter Criteria Within Limits? Sampling Train Leak Check 

### < 0.02 cfm or< 0.04 lpm yes

Pi tot Tube Leak Check < 0.1 in. H 2 

### 0 

### in 15 sec. yes

Console Calibration 'Y 

### +/- 0.02 yes

Thermocouples 

### +/- 2% of ref. temp. yes
Quality control procedures for the Methods 6 and 26 sampling have included the analysis of reagent blanks. An 

### EPA audit sample for 

### S0 2 

### was also analyzed. The results of the blanks and audit sample are included in Appendix 3 with the lab results. US EPA Approved Alternate Method AL T -009 was used for the console post-test calibration and can be found in Appendix 1. The pre-test and post-test thermocouple system calibrations were performed using the procedures found in US EPA Approved Alternate Method ALT -011 and can be found in Appendix 4.

Field data and final laboratory results were independently audited and reviewed for verification of data. The Emission Test Report is audited for completeness and reasonableness of data. The report requires the signature of the project manager and Vice President or President before release to the client. Data and final reports are archived in a secured area for a minimum period of three years.
Integrity's field and laboratory test equipment has been maintained and calibrated in accordance with quality
assurance procedures established by the US EPA in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume 

### ill. Equipment calibrations including pre-test and post-test calibration data

are presented in Appendix 4.

INFEGRn'Y AIR MONITORING, INC. Page 13Stationary Source Sampling Report, F/orim USA Ki/11 No. I Bngllouse Inlet & Exhaust 

### 5.0 APPENDICES Jnmtnl)' 8, 2009 /lllegrlly Project No. 08-100



### The appendices contain detailed support documentation that encompasses the relevant aspects of the emission test program. This data serves as the foundation for the test report. The emission test report presents a summary of the information gathered during the sampling activities. The following appendices have been provided to facilitate the review of the test report:
Appendix 1 -Detailed Sununary 

### of Results and Example Calculations Appendix 2 -Field Data Sheets Appendix 3 -Laboratory Documentation Appendix 4 - Calibration Documentation Appendix 

### 5

- Facility Production Documentation

INTEGRITY AIR MONITORING, INC. Page 14

## APPENDIX!

SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS



## 15

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

## CJ EPA METHOD 26 

# A Determination of**Hyd~ogen** 

### Chloride Emissions Florim USA ' 

### Clarksville, TN I 

### Kiln No. 

### 1 Baghouse Inlet All MONITORING, INC:.


### Run Number 1 

### 2 3 Avg Date: 11/18/08 11/18/08 11/18/08 

# e Net Time of Test, minutes 60 

## 60 60 Tstart Start Time 821 945 1112

Tend 

### End Time 921 1046 1212

Pbar 

### Barometric Pressure, 

### in. Hg 29.88 29.88 29.88 29.88 

## Pc Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.4412 -0.4412 -0.4412 -0.4412 Ps Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.439 29.439 29.439 29.439 

# VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, liters 120.7 120.1 119.8 120.2 

## y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 

# TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 64.9 73.0 72.3 70.1 Vsro Volume San1pled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 4.08 3.99 3.99 4.02 

## Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.034 0.039 0.037 0.037 PMv Percent Moisture in Stack 3.4 3.9 3.7 3.7 Mpo 

### Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.966 0.961 0.963 0.963 

## Md Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Ms Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lbllb mole 28.625 28.571 28.592 28.596 

### Cp Pi tot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84**~PS** 

### Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, 

### in. H 2 

### 0 0.632 0.630 0.631 0.631 Ts Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 324.4 324.6 337.6 328.9 Vs Avg. Stack Velocity, ftlsec 43.8 43.7 44.1 43.9 A Area Stack, 

### ft 2 

### 8.296 8.296 8.296 8.296 

## Oso Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 13,951 13,844 13,766 13,854 

# QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, 

## CFM 21,808 21,757 21,950 21,839 

## Osw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 14,444 14,406 14,297 14,382



## 16

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

### 8 EPA METHOD 26 

# J& Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions Florim USA 

## Clarksville, TN Kiln No. 1 

## Baghouse Inlet AIR MONITOitiNO, INC.



## Hydrogen Chloride Concentrations and Emission Rates

Old 

## Hydrogen Chloride Catch, mg 7.59 7.67 4.36 6.54 

# ·c Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, mg/dscm 65.76 67.83 38.60 57.40



## Ca Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.029 0.030 0.017 0.025 

## CAw Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbslhr 3.43 3.51 1.99 2.97



## Hydrogen Fluoride Concentrations and Emission Rates md 

## Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 4.17 4.40 2.46 3.68 

# c Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, mg/dscm 36.1 38.9 21.8 32.3 

## Ca Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.016 0.017 0.009 0.014 

## CAw Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 1.88 2.01 1.12 1.67



## 17

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

## EPA METHOD 26 Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions Florim USA Clarksville, 

### TN Kiln No. 1 Baghouse litlet 

### Example Calculations Run 1 Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

### p S 

## = Pbar 

## + p g 

### = 

### Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 17.647 

### * VM(Jiters) 

### * 0.03531 

# * 'Y 

# * Pbar 

### Vsro = -------------------------------------------------- 

# = TM +460 Moisture Content of Gas Stream Vwc 

### Bws = ---------------------------------- = 

### Vsm 

## + Ywc 

### Percent Moisture in Stack 

### 100 

# * Vwc p MV = --------------------------- 

## = Ysro 

## + Vwc Mole Fraction of 

## Dry Gas 

### 100- PMv 

### ·MFo 

## = ----------------------- == 

### 100 Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, 

## Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

## Mel= 0.44 

# * %C0 2 

## + 0.32 

# * %0 2 

## + 0.28 

# * (100- 

### %C0 2 - 

### %0 2 ) 

# = Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 

### Ms 

# = Md 

# * (1- 

### Bws) 

## + 18.0 

### * Bws = 

### Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

### (T 8 

### +460) 

## Vs = 

### 85.49 

# * Cp 

# * 8PS 

# * SQRT
------------------------- 

# = (Ps 

# * Ms) Gas Volume Flow, 

### Dry Std. Cond., CFM 

### 1058.82 

# * Vs *A* Ps 

# * (1- 

### Bws) Oso= --------------------------------------------------- 

# = Ts+ 460 Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

## QA = 

# v s 

# * A 

# * 60 

# = Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

### Osw 

## = Qso 

# * [1/(1-Bws)] 

## = CJ 

# J&

.



# . AIR MONITORING, INC,



### 29.439

4.08

0.034

3.4

0.966

29.0



### 28.625

43.8

13951

21808

14444 

## 18

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26 

### Detennination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions Florim USA Clarksville, 

## TN Kiln No.1 Baghouse Inlet Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, mg/dscm md 

# c == -------------------------------- == 

## Vsm 

# * 0.02831 Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf md 

# * 0.0154 Ca 

# = ------------------------------- = VsTo 

### Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr CAw= 

## 0.00857 

# * Ca !fc· 

### Qso 

### Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 

### in. Hg 

### CJ 

# J&

0



# . Alit MONITOit!HO, INC.



### 65.760

0.029



## 3.43

19

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

### 5J EPA METHOD 26 

# J& Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions Florim USA . 

### Clarksville, TN I 

### Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Exhaust AlA MONITORING, INC.


### Run Number 1 2 3 Avg Date: 11/18/08 11/18/08 11118/08 

# e Net Time of Test, minutes 

## 60 60 

## 60 Tstart Start Time 821 945 1112

Tend 

### End Time 921 1046 1212 

## Pbar Barometric Pressw·e, 

### in. Hg 29.88 29.88 29.88 29.88 

## PC Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.0235 -0.0235 -0.0235 -0.0235 Ps Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.856 29.856 29.856 29.856 VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, liters 120.7 120.1 120.5 120.4 y 

## Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.949 0.949 0.949 0.949 

# TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 64.4 75.2 76.8 72.1 Vsro Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 4.07 3.96 3.97 4.00 Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.036 0.032 0.036 0.035
PMv 

### Percent Moisture in Stack 3.6 3.2 3.6 3.5 MFo Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.964 0.968 0.964 0.965 Md Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lbllb mole 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 

## Ms Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 28.603 28.649 28.600 28.617 Cp Pi tot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 APS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H 2 

## 0 0.513 0.520 0.508 0.514 Ts Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 287.9 287.6 287.8 287.8 

### Vs A vg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 34.5 34.9 34.1 34.5 A Area Stack, 

## ft2 10.202 10.202 10.202 10.202 Qso Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 14,339 14,573 14,180 14,364 

# QA Actual Gas Volmne Flow, CFM 21,116 21,359 20,886 21,120 Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 14,876 15,053 14,716 14,882



## 20

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA 

## METHOD 26 

## Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions Florim USA 

## Clarksville, TN 

## Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Exhaust

-Hydrogen Chloride Concentrations and Emission Rates md Hydrogen Chloride Catch, mg 

# c Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, mg/dscm Ca Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf CAw Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbslhr

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentrations and Emission Rates

md 

## Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 

# c Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, mg/dscm Ca 

## Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf CAw Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbslhr 5.45 47.33 0.021 2.54

0.037 0.32 0.00014

0.017 

## CJ 

# J&

AUt MONITOR!NO, INC.



### 5.58 2.87 4.63 

### 49.71 

## 25.55 40.86 0.022 0.011 0.018 2.71 1.35 2.20

0.041 <0.020 < 0.033 0.37 <0.18 <0.29 0.00016 < 0.00008 < 0.00013

0.020 < 0.009 < 0.016



## 21

### SlJNIMARY OF RESULTS 

# s02- 6.3 

### EPA Iv1ETHOD 6 

# l'n 

# \et 

# lr Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Florim USA !11C.INO,IHC, 

### Clarksville, TN Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet Run Number 1 2 3 Avg Date: 11118/08 11118/08 11118/08 

# e Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 Tstart Start Time 821 945 1112 Tend End Time 921 1045 1212 

### Pbar Barometric· Pressure, in. Hg 29.88 29.88 29.88 29.88 

### Pa Static Pressure, 

## in. Hg -0.441 -0.441 -0.441 -0.441 

### Ps Stack Pressure, Absolute, ll1.1ig 29.439 29.439 29.439 29.439 VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 34.25 34.33 34.40 34.33 8H 

### Avg. Delta H, in. H 2 

### 0 

### 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 

## TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 68.6 72.4 73.4 71.5 Vr:;m Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

### 34.25 34.09 34.09 34.14 Vc Volume of Water Collected, ml 25.7 29.4 27.9 27.7 Vwc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 1.21 1.38 1.31 1.30 Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.034 0.039 0.037 0.037 

## PMV Percent Moisture in 

### Stack 3.41 3.90 3.71 3.68 

### Mrn Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.966 0.961 0.963 0.963 

### Me Mole

.. Wt. Stack Gas, 

## Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 

### Ms Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 28.625 28.571 28.592 28.596 Cp Pi tot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 8PS 

### A vg. Sqrt. 

### Delta P, in. 

### H 2 

### 0 

### 0.632 0.630 0.631 0.631 Ts A vg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 324.4 324.6 337.6 328.9 Vs Avg. Stack Velocity, ftlsec 43.8 43.7 44.1 43.9 A 

### Area Stack, ft 2 

### 8.296 8.296 8.296 8.296



# 22

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EJ 

### EPAMETHOD6 

# J& Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Florim USA
.a MONIIOIINO,INt. 

### Clarksville, 1N Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet Qso Gas Volume Flow, Dry 

### Std. Cond., CFM 13,951 13,844 13,766 13,854 QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 21,808 21,758 21,950 21,839 Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 14,444 14,406 14,297 14,382

Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations And Emission Rates N 

### Normality of Barium Perchlorate, g-eq./liter 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103
Ysoln 

### Volume 

# of Sample Solution, ml 400.0 400.0 400.0 400.0 Vt Volume of Titrant Used in Sample, ml 5.42 5.49 2.94 4.61

vtb 

### Volume of Titrant Used in Blank, m1 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Va Volume of Sample Aliquot Titrated, ml 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 CS0 2 

### Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, lbs/dscf 9.18E-06 9.34E-06 5.01E-06 7.84E-06 CAw Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate, lbslhr 7.68 7.76 4.14 6.53



# 23

### SUM1v.IARY OF RESULTS EPAMETHOD6 

### Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Florim USA Clarksville, TN 

### Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet Example Calculati.ons Run 1 

### Stack Pressure, 

### Absolute, in. Hg 

### P S = 

### P bar 

## + P g 

## = Volume 

### Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

### 17.647 

# * VM 

# * (Pbllt 

## + 6H I 13.6) 

# v

'tirO 

# = ____________________________________ .... ____________ = TM 

### +460 Volume of 

### Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF Vwc = 

### 0.04709 

# * Vc = 

### Moisture Content of Gas Stream Vwc Bws = --------------------------------- 

### = 

### Ysm+Vwc 

### Percent Moisture in Stack 100 

# * Vwc PMv = -----------------------·-· .. 

# = Vsm 

## + Vwc Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 100- PMV MFo 

# = ----·---------------- .. - = 100 Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

### Md 

# = 0.44 

# * %C02 

## + 0.32 

# * %02+ 

## 0.28 

# * (100- %C0 2
- %0 2 ) 

# = Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole Ms = 

### Md 

# * (1

- Bws) 

## + 18.0 

# * Bwa 

## = Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec (T 5 

## + 460) Vs 

# = 85.49 

# * CP 

# * 6PS 

# * SQRT

------------ ........................ 

# = (Ps 

# * MJ 29.439

34.2

1.21

0.034

3.4

0.966

29.0

28.625

43.8



## 24

### SUNfMA.RY OF RESULTS EPAMETHOD6 Detennination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Florim USA Clarksville, TN Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 1058.82 * Vs *A* Ps * (1

- Bws) Qso= -------------------------------------------------- = 

### Ts 

## + 460 Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM QA 

# = v s 

# * A 

# * 60 

# = Gas Volwne Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM Qsw = 

### Qso* [11(1-Bws)] 

# = Area ofNozzle, ft2 

## An= ((Dn 

### /2) 2 

# * 3.14159)/144 

## = Percent Isokinetic 0.0945 

# * (Ts +460) 

# * Vsm I :: ----------------------------------------------- = 

### 9 

# * V s 

# * P s 

# * ( 1 " Bws) 

# * An Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, lbs/dscf N(Vt- Vtb) 

# * (VsolnNa) 

## cso2 

# = 7 .061E-05 

# *---------------------------- = 

### Vsm Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate, lbs/hr CAw 

# = cso2 

# * 60 

## * 

## QSd = 

### Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 

### 29.92 in. Hg 

### 13,951



### 21,808


### 14,444

0.00034

101.2

9.18E-06

7.68



# 25

## SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

# S02- EJ 

## EPAMETHOD6 

# ottrrt-e+- 

# J& Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Florim USA Am MOHifGlWQ, INC. 

## Clarksville, TN Kiln No.1 Baghouse Exhaust Run Number 1 2 3 

## Avg Date: 11/18/08 11/18/08 11/18/08 

## 9 Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 Tstart Start Time 821 945 1112

Tend 

## End Time 921 1045 1212 Pbar Barometric ·Pressure, in. Hg 29.88 29.88 29.88 29.88 ps 

## Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.024 -0.024 -0.024 -0.024 Ps Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.856 29.856 29.856 29.856 VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, qu, 

## ft. 43.49 44.33 44.87 44.23 

## AH A vg. Delta H,

**~·** 

## H 2 

## 0 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 TM Avg. 

## Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 67.3 77.8 81.6 75.6
Vsm 

## Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 43.67 43.64 43.87 43.73 Vc 

## Volume of Water Collected, 

## ml 34.7 30.5 35.2 33.5 Vwc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 1.63 1.44 1.66 1.58 Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.036 0.032 0.036 0.035 PMV Percent Moisture in Stack 3.61 3.19 3.64 3.48 

## MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.964 0.968 0.964 0.965 

## Md Mole. Wt. Stack 

## Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 

## Ms Mole. Wt. Stack 

## Gas, Wet 

## Basis, lb/lb mole 28.603 28.650 28.599 28.617 Cp 

## Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84

. 0.84 0.84 ilPS A vg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H 2 

## 0 0.513 0.520 0.508 0.514 Ts Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 287.9 287.6 287.8 287.8 Vs 

## Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 34.5 34.9 34.1 34.5 A 

## Area Stack, ft 2 

## 10.202 10.202 10.202 10.202



# 26

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS CJ 

### EPAMETHOD6 

# a& Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Florim USA loll MOMfOIINO,IMC. 

### Clarksville, TN Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Exhaust Qso 

### Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 14,339 14,573 14,180 14,364 QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 21,116 21,359 20,886 21,120 Qsw 

### Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 14,876 15,053 14,716 14,881



## Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations And Emission Rates N Normality of Barium Perchlorate, g-eq.lliter 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 Vsoln Volume of Sample Solution, 

## m1 400.0 400.0 400.0 400.0 Vt Volwne of Titrant Used in Sample, ml 5.56 5.94 3.72 5.07 Vtb Volume of Titrant Used in Blank, ml 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

## Va Volume of Sample Aliquot Titrated, ml 

## 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 

# cso2 Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, lbs/dscf 7.39E-06 7.90E-06 4.92E-06 6.74E-06 CAw Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate, lbs/br 6.36 6.91 4.18 5.82



## 27

### APPENDIX2

FIELD DATA SHEETS

28

### EPAMethodl

**Determ~nation** 

### of Sampling Points

Client _F..;..;lo..;..;rim;;.-;...

____________ _ 

### Sampling Location

**.;;;B~agh=o.;;;;us;;.;;.e..;;;Inl;;:;e.;.;;t** 

### ______ _ City Clarksville, 1N Date Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE) 2 X Length X Width

Length+ Width


### Stack Area

Traverse Points

- Percentage of Stack ID Rectangular Stacks ' : .. :• 2 3 4 

## s 25 16.7 

### 12.5 10 2 75 50 37.5 30

,··

...

**·~'** . 3 .. 

### 83.3 62.5 50 _, .. 

### .. 4 

## ....... 87.5 70

.. : ' :

**~**



### .. . . , . 5

**.-;:~,.** .··::· 

## .. 90 

### 6

**··~~**

**~** l :

**·:"~:** ; •• :::':

.. : • I

**.:~ .·~**  **.~~:·:** 

## _: ':

**~~ff;·:~~** 

## ...

**,~·-~**

Circular Stacks 4 

### 6 8 10 6.7 

### 4.4 3.2 2.6 2 

### 25 14.6 10.5 8.2 3 75 

### 29.6 19.4 14.6 4 93.3 

### 70.4 32.3 22.6 5 85.4 67.7 34.2 

### 6 80.6 65.8 

### 7 89.5 77.4 8 96.8 

### 85.4 9 •':·:··.r

.. , ·.

··.. t:•-.· 91.8 97.4 :····,.· ·.·.'='·· 

### 10 ·.!::"._··

.. ·.- ... 11

.. 

### ... .:.-:

**~** ''" . •. 12 

### 6 8.3 25 41.7 

### 58.3 75 91.7



### 12 2.1 6.7 11.8 17.7 

### 25 35.6 64.4 75 82.3 

### 88.2 93.3 97.9 Samplin2 Location Dimensions 

## vJS:D 

## /.a.D Far Wall to Outside of Port Nipple Length Depth of Duct Width (Rectangular Duct)

Distance to Ports From Nearest Disturbance A B 

# I r'-f II 

## 11::1/Q 11 

# I Dislance, inches

. . . No. Diameters



# Hon~6"'4-"'-l **~vt.** 

# f

A



### 8

Location of Sampline Points
Point % of Stack ID Inches From Nipple Inches From Stack ID inches Inside Wall Length Outside ofPort

2 3 4 .. ·.--.·· 3::t-3 ''I

**·~~** ..

**~~,** I

**~** 

### fi • 

### 5'11 5 

### 6 7 

### 8 9 r· •.

...... f

**~** ' 10 

### .. , ... , .

**~ ~-.**  **~~;. ,:.~**  .. ·. 11 12



## 29G:J 

# Ji,

.. 

# -- EPA Method 2

- Field Data Sheet Client (, &> 

# r:**~** Sampling Location

### ~4~ 

# h**tJ,A~** Run 

### Date Jl

### /f1/~1J. 

## __ City,State

# C)~~)lAi/Jf , 

# rrJ OAillttJ Operators

## -.~.o:o:/f~;r....=;,C/_,_,_Jlf~t--------­ Time 

### JU.uO Barometric Pressure, 

### in. Hg

### .....:!..~'1..:..·---=-::·.J=--------­ Static 

### Pressure, in. 

### H 1 

### 0**_--.:..!-IP~· :;,~-------**  

### Pitot Tube I.D. No. 0'( 1 

## n \d 

### Pitot Tube Leak**Che_ck;;;.....;;;..+~'5':--·;;...0---.-~,~t-.** /r----

Traverse

Point Number ' . '·

. Ve1oclty Head 

### tap Inches

. H10

. 

### Field Data
StOck**·~i ~··**  •

. Temperatiire °F : <**"~-:** . l •• •

.. :. . . - ·.. .. .. . . •. 

## . . :**~** .:·:·, ,. '**~p.** at 0°**Re~ercaee** ' .·.. . . . ' Angle**'\Yhlc~** Yields**aN~ ~p**  -.:: '

Stack Temperature, 

### Dry, °F (A)----- 

### Difference (A- B)---------


### Comments 

### V,64 

# o.u; t;' 

# o.o'7 tJr(}J 

# 4 f),j)"J 

# tJ I 

# c.t 2.. 0 

## 0 0 0 

## 0 

# 0 iJ 6 

# D**1),0~** 

# b '2- 

# 0 n/1.**o~o-z.** 

## (p

Stack 

### Temperature, Wet op (B)------ 

### Preliminary Percent Moisture

_____ _ 

# I.R 

# 0 ?J (\ 0 

## i) 

## 0 1



# 30

### EPA Method 2- Field Data Sheet
Client Florim City, State Clarksyille. TN Sampling**Location~B~agh~o=us~e~In=let~-------** 

### ProjectNwnber**...¥0~8-~10~0** ------- 

### Run Date 1{ / 

### i 

## t' I \> 

## $ Operators 

## 4Qb
I 

## Jl11 Pitot Tube I.D. No. 

## D**~** 

## · t 

## 1 \o Leak Check+ 

### <-t I 

### C{ • 

# 7 /2.
Run Number 1 2 3 

### Time (24-Hour Clock)

### Q_~t-5" 

# oq'1o**1/J~** Barometric Pressure, in. 

### Hg

### ~CJ~**~4,**

## ~~·**l)~** 

## '2**q,~]S** 

### Static Pressure, H 2 

### 0 

## -[p,'() -f.o.a -/P.ia Stack Temp., Dry, op 

### J.Jc/-1 

## .AAI+ 

## UA Stack Temp., Wet, op 

# 1 I I Moisture,%

# ~ 

# j/ Jl



# 4. J



### PJ 

## 1

\.(



# o.?to

f 

# o, «to)**1'1)(,~.**



## 31

### Field Data Slteet- EPA Method 6 -sulfur Dioxide Client _Florim.
____________________ _ City/State _Clarksville, TN.
_________________ _ Sampling Location Baghouse Inlet

Bar. Press., In. Hg 

### :Jq · 

## Z' :( Sample ID No. 

# q; I 

### Dt)

...



# ~ Static Press., In. H,O 

## -In 

## .D y 

## = I. DD 

## 3 Obse er 

### (f. 

# v r

Jf 

# J lK.-.,

**~\IS** H



### Jt~ 0 

### fs' , ...... Meter Box No. 

## C...,. 

## 5ZJ00-?> Probe No. Agency

__ 

### v-_B'_~ 

## L

__ Sample Box No. 

## I 

# Y

**~**

**A<"~** f Probe Temp. Sett.Uig

**~** 

## :zO Start Time --.;-::;;._t...

__ _ RunNumber

_ ___.__ ___ _ Date 

### H



# ~~~

**~** ZXr Operators 

### A-:\ 

# 0

LEAK CHECKS Pre· Test ()

.. Ot:> 

### 3 @ 

# Is- In. Hg. Post-Test 

### b 1 

### b(;)l



### @~ln.Hg. End Time 

# cR l. 

## I 24 • Hr

10

**'LI~J** 

### 7/

**i~·~** .. ';)

...

**(.:~:/~** J-

**~** /_ e--, 

# .J-.. ·.···.' .!

... : .•

**·~** .•.•

**'-~-:** (_Q .:>

**~** ,

**-~**



### Analysis of Moisture Recovery lmpinger 

### 1 2 3 

### 4 SG Final Weight,

**m~** 

## '3D 

# '2 S" Lo ;- l.. Jt;).) 

### Initial Weight, mg 

### ·\co I Do 1c)0 t. 

### 00 Net Gain, mg 

### ·-1.-o :Z.h"' I[ 

### )$',; 

# €0

32

### Field Data Sl1eet- EPA Met/Jod 6 -sulfur Dioxide
Client

**_Florim~-------------------** City/State _Clarksville, TN
________________ _ Samplirig Location Baghouse Inlet

')ct

**.~~~** Bar. Press., In. Hg _.I.__;_ 1-=-'V- Sample 

### ID No. 

## lSlou _.. 

# 9 Run Number 

### _'1..

____ _ Date



# \ill~ **/0~** Operators 

### It 51> , 

### .Jlf'-

- LEAK CHECKS Static 

### Press., In. H20 · 

### -{.p " 

## 0 Meter Box No. 

### C 

## )"DDO

**~** 

## '} . Y 

## = i 

## ,OL)j Observer 

### :f '



## ~ **rt1rJl~** . f >
.. 

# r 

# tt' s AM&...

.... r lr 

### Pre-Testb.ao'(



## @~ln. Hg. 

# -c - Probe No. Agency 

## -(b t;' PostwTest 

## d,()OJ 

## @_?

__ In. 

### Hg. 

## OCf'f. 

# "J End 

### Time 

## J04(p 24 • Hr 

# - Sample Box No.



### ----:/.--:7~-- Probe 

### Temp. Setting 

## t 

# fi 0 Start Thne



## ..

**-~J;.** 

## _, ... 

## }''ftiif;: =i ••

. Vacuwri : -Temp·:

**~** ·Inches · .°F .Hg. :.-.

**~** .. i"

.. :· .• 0 5 

## I 50 10 

### 15 20 25 30 35 40 

### I 

# f.oo 45 50

60 

# ,ca,'7., ""

**~~:Jf\~;:-_':··::·:~!~::** 

# .. :
..

**,·;:.~;~?~;f:r?~~ ·:~'f~:J.~·:.~?·:-~~r~·.**  **::·:~** 

## ·:?

...

**::~** 

## ....

**~** 

# · .· _, ·

**~** 

# .. :

**-~-.** 

# ·

**~~,** 

# ) "'

. ,

**~** 

# , , . o 'l;). L.f, ,



### :~ffl~ **i:r;':K~~:.** 

# :_ .

**~·'·~~-** 

# : . ·

**-~~.** 

# :}

..

lmpinger 

### Final Weight, mg Initial Weight, mg Net Gain, mg Analysis 

### of Moisture Recovery 1-1 

### D

..'l 

### 1

**~00·0** d00·D 

## c;.o

;)OO·D

**d.~~.** L..{ 

# --

**~a..t-f** 2 3 

### 4 SG



## 33

### Field Data Sheet- EPA Method 6 -Sulfur Dioxide

"I Client _Florim.

____________________ _ RunNumber _·)

_____ _ City/State _Clarksville, TN

_________________ _ Date

__

## ,....L.l/...L.r..it£.~~· ........



# 1**o~S~·** 

# --- Sampling Location Baghousc Inlet Operators 

### A-.f)**~** 

### Bar. Press., 

### In. Hg 

## .)"1 '

## ~~ Static Press., In. HzO 

### --0; · U Meter Box No. [

## ~U;Q · ) Sample Box No. 

## _l**~'1** 

# __ _ Sample ID No. 

### t{ll)) "l 

# 0 LEAK CHECKS



## . . 1 ,-' Y=

## ~-t:O] Observer

## ~-**~f'-Ylk·J A,i{~:** **1~** lS Pre-Test 

### 0

..

## ~~ ®JLin. Hg.**-~** ..,_ (..(_ r, 1 

### \0 J I

_ Probe No. Agency**'~~.,** Post· Test li • "-"**@~In.** Hg. Probe Temp. Setting 

## 2 '5 <.) Start Time \ll 

## 2.. End Time 

### I 

## lt l. 24

- 

### Hr



### Analysis of Moisture Reco-very



## 34

### Field Data Slleet- EPA Met/Jod 26- 

### Hydrogen Cillo ride & 

### Fluoride Client _Florim _____________________ _ City/State _Clarksville, 

### 1N __________________ _ Sampling Location Baghouse Inlet

Bar. Press., In. Hg

**~'1 -1s~**  Static Press., In. H 3 0 "'-{.Q. • 

### b
Meter Box No. 

### YO

**51"~~**

**y_~tn-** 

## .. 1. Sample Box No.

**~-** Sample ID No. 

# q; l 

# 00 .- 0 (
Y = I). 

### 1(d. Observer ..::( • ..



# ~ **~cllt1** Probe No. ,-, 

### 'dl,- Agency 

## ""iT)f..(
Probe Temp. Setting 

### ;? 

## ?'D Start Time



## L)~1.. I Run Number

__ __.__ ___ _ Date 

### II 

# {II( / D f( Operators 

## A

**I~**
LEAK CHECKS 

### Pre-Test 

## &:o/'

**@~In.** Hg. Post· Test () 

# .l•u4 @ 

# _!i__ In. Hg. 

## U

... All End Tune 24 • Hr 

# :. :.

**-~:Gas** 

# :

**:~** 

# .

. '. eter · · . · **,'·:Pump'~=** 

### .Vaeuum' ;-,.Imp •. · .Temp 

### Tem,.e.crature.°F:



## ::.=:-~rs~-}~ '•.: op 

# ·; :

**_ve~ge** 

# .. 

# ·>.

. . 0 

## o.ooo

**~** 

## .. 0

**:~** 

## 1..

**~<.t** 5



### 4J~ 

### ~ 

# !Jff' 10 

# !"4 ::>

**~f)** 15 (IJI 

### .;} 

## l.oO 20 

# G,;:>

**~**

**~(\** 

### 25



### ~~~ 

# d l.oO 30



### 'l..o~ 

### :;;;)

**-~~** 35



## ~~ 

## 2.. 

# 5"'7 40



### ~Cf 

## 2 (tO 45



### fo~ 

## '"Z.

**~~.** 

# so '1D 

## .J 

# /.o:;;J. 55 

### 'it,

**~** 

# G7 60

·- .. ·:.:J.:

·.·.

**'~** . . : ' 

### ..

. ·.::···.: .... ·:_;..· 

### A11alysls of Moisture Recovery 

### Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 Final Volume, m1 

### Initial Volume, m1 30 

### Net Condensed Volume, ml 

### Impinger Absorbing Solution NaOH Final Volume, 

### m1 Initial Volume, ml 15 

### Net Condensed Volume, ml Total Condensed Volume, ml


### Percent Silica Gel Spent Final Weight, g Initial Weicltt,

**~** 

### 15 

### Net Absorbed Water. 2 .• .:.•

**·~'Y·:** ... ':

. . f-1-

.

... '.···
.. • ..

**~** • r; 

### - 

### .. 

### Total Rea2ent Collected, g 

## 35

### Field Data Slleet- EPA Method 

### 26- Hydrogen Cltloride &

### Fluo~ide Client _Florim

_____________________ _ City/State _Clarksville, TN

__________________ _ Sampling Location Baghouse Inlet

Bar. Press., In. 

### Hg

## ~ 

# 4 ·**~~** Sample ID No. 

# 1i l 

## Vu

- 

# u1

y r::

## O~qG"tobserver J,

## f7r~lf.oi!,, Static Press., In. H 2 0

... 

### b i\) Meter Box No. \) 

## Q l;'i"

.. 'l, Sample Box No. 

## VO 71 

### -''t Probe No.

_____ _ Probe Temp. Setting 

## 11{) Agency 

# 1\)i?Jl
Start Time 

### 0 

## 1 '-t '["

. Dry 

## ·aa.s. . . . .. _Sam_ple · .. Cl k M t ., . 

### ,Flow Rate;

. .. . oc . . e er ·. . =**~** 

### ,LPM

. • ..

Time · . LiterS ·:, ·**-~;·** ; · : · · ·

•· • I• '·•,.

-:-.::·. · .. _ .. , ,• '•. ..,;!. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 

## so 55 

### 60

.. \

. ' '•'i ··.:: ·;;-. 

## ·'l3.D A11alysis of Moisture Recovery 

### Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 

## 1fihal Volume, ml**Initial~ume,** 

### ml 30 

### Net Condeime.d Volume_, 

### ml ImJ>inger Absorb'iBg Solution NaOH Final Volume, ml**~** ...... 

### Initial Volume, m1 

## ""'. 15 Net Condensed Volume, ml ...

.............. 

### Total Condensed Volume, 

### m1

...............



### 15 Run Number 

# 'l

------- Date 

## It ( r

## ~ 

# i D 

# $ Operators 

### A 

# r)

.. :Jm.

LEAK CHECKS Pre-Test 

### (}.oOf..e @_L)__In. 

### Hg. Post· Test 

## D · VO"l. @ 

# _j_ In. 

### Hg. End Time (0 

## L£ (a 24- Hr



# l..4 Lf



# 36

### Field Data Slzeet- EPA Method 26- 

### Hydrogel! Chloride & 

### Fluoride Client _Florim

____________________**~** City/State _Clarksville, 1N.

_________________ _ Sampling Location Bagbouse Inlet

Bar. Press., In. Hg**;,>,.~,. 't)~**  Sample ID No. 

### 4) 

## 1 t)l) / 

# t}J

Static 

### Press., In. 

### H20

...... 6 r \) Y= 

# O.qfz.. Observer 

# J.**~(~{p:t** Meter Box No. Sample Box 

### No. 

# vu**'t~"1.** Probe No. Agency

### I'll~ 

## c_ 

## \Jv'?T"1. Probe Temp. Setting 

## 2.5"0 Start Time 

## /tlL. 

# ·_·,.: ·{

... · ... .

: .. ;:. · ·-: ..**_·tiry;'oa~·:** 

# ...... · ·.**~·** 

# ·**.S~_ple** 

### :_.:.;. ·: 

# nr.Y oas· · ;:**~-..·::Pump** 

## :. Cioclc :**·.·,~·** Meter : · .**Fl~wRa~;·;.** , 'Meter · · ··vacuum ".'Tiine.· :_ ::·· Liters:·:-:- ,.

### ~M Temperatme°F · Inches 

### .;·<:: ·.: ·· ..**~:·.:** 

### .... · ..**·,~·:::'./;~** 

### .-·.: ·.**Averag~** 

### :'-·_.1-Jg::-·. 0 5 10 15 

### 20 25 30 

### 35 40 

### 45 50 55 

### 60
:
.....**~** .. \'**,:.r~:;~·;·,..~.** •

. ·,**·.~:::;;-~~:' ~:_** **~-~:·:.** 

## (s,t 

# '-

· .... ! ·.·. ·• .'-:;''·:· 10 

### ,o , :::. ·'·· .•.**·.·~** 

# '1 l**·~** 

## '7-:::}**~** 

# 'l·:L**~** 

## t-}::J. 0} 

# '"12 :;l..

### 'I~**~** 

## '1 

# '3 ·d.. 

## ·'1Y**~** Cf{.OL.f 

# '1_S' ;t. "1tp 

# 2 ltD.tt r')/..P**~**



### Analysis of Moisture Recovery Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 Final VolUBl.e, ml 

### Initial Voiume;

.. mi 30 

### Net Condensed V OllUlle, ml 

### Impinger Absorbing §btution NaOH Final Volume, ml 

# "' Initial Volume, ml 

# "' IS Net Condensed Volume, 

### m1**I'......~** 

### Total Condensed Volume, ml
Percent Silica Gel S!!_ent Final W'eiWl_t, g 

### Initial 

### Weight:g

.... , 15 Net Absorbed Water, 

## g
............. Total Reagent Collected, g ..... ....___ Run Number 

# _7

_____ _ Date 

## I 

# tl 

# tt lo'l> Operators 

## /hr) t \:D
LEAl{ CHECKS Pre-Test &.Odj**@~In.** Hg. Post· Test 

## rJ .'0 

## i @ 

## lb_ In. Hg. End Time 

## I 

# Z

)1 24 • Hr 

### ··Imp·:··:· Temp · ·. op. :, :. .'**~:.**



## 37

### EPA Method 1 Determination of Sampling Points

Client ..:.F.:;:1o;.:,:rim::::::...

____________ _ 

### Sampling Location**-=B~agh~Z:.:.;;o.;;;;::us;.;.e..;;:O;.;;u:=.tle;;.;;t** 

### ______ _ City Clarksville, 1N 

### Date 

## hJflfcfb
Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE) 2 X Length X Width DE::= Length+ Width

Traverse Points

- Percentae:e of Stack ID Rectan2ular Stacks

..

·. 2 3 4 5 25. 

### 16.7 12.5 10 2 

### 75 50 37.5 30 3 83.3 

### 62.5 50

..... 4 .. 

### 87.5 70 5 - ... 

### .90

.. 

### . . '·:. '. .· .. 

### 6 . .**~-."':.** . · 

## .. : .. ,'''



### .**~** ' ·. 

### . ,_,,::."-:'·.···

Circular Stacks 

### 4 6 8 

### 10 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 

### 2 25 

### 14.6 10.5 8.2 3 75 

### 29.6 19.4 14.6 4 93.3 

### 70.4 32.3 22.6 

### 5 85.4 67.7 34.2 6 95.6 80.6 

### 65.8 7**;~·** ·c.;. .. .. .. .. 

### 89.5 77.4 8 

### ·: 

## .. •' 96.8 85.4 :<· ·. :.:.:.

···-·'"' 0 91.8 9 '**~** . .":_ .. , .. l, '· 

### 97.4 10 :**~** 

### . -.; .

. .':.:.;.'·. . '

•, 

### 11 12 . ·, .,· 

### 6 8.3 25 41.7 

### 58;3 75 91.7

12 2.1 6.7 11.8 17.7 

### 25 35.6 64.4 

### 75 82.3 88.2 93.3 97.9 Samplinl! Location Dimensions 

## '1'1 If Far Wall to Outside of Port 

## ') ;") .J" Nipple Length 

## '-!**~** 

### tl.!) Depth of Duct Width (Rectangular Duct)

Distance to Ports From Nearest Disturbance

Point



### 2 3 

### 4 

# s 6 7 8 9 

### 10 11 12 Distance, inches No. Diameters

# T~ )'tb**~** 

### A 

# j_



# 1 'l>r l,. 8 

# 1

Location of Sampling Points % of Stack ID Inches From Nipple Inches From Stack ID inches Inside Wall

.,. .. Length

.. · _;·**-":~·** ...

·:::.**~** ; 0 l

...**~·** ··:. !·**.~.! ·~~r**  :.;;:, •.<: ;'. ,**~** • l···

... •

r.,:.. j Outside ofPort



## 38

## EPA Method 2 -Field Data Sheet Client () 

# br,'JVJ City. State



## CJ)ifJ~> V' 

### ,J 

# e. nJ Sampling Location 

### tJ 

## 11 h 

## cV,f2 

# t-il/1

**av~1** Operators



### ~~B...:;~~C...,_. **--U~Iti""-'C,<** ______ _ 

### Run 

### Date 

### tt( 1 

### '2 l 0 

### q Time 

### __,;l:....:f:..."'.JL..il

**,l:::C;,__~----=~------** 

### Barometric Pressure. in. 

### Hg 

### ?t 

## "l

**~** 

## '!{If Pitot Tube I.D. No.



### ---~~:{);,:~~-·...;.,jtl~f""""!)~--~--- Static Pressure, in. H 2 0
- 

### D 1 

### ?J 

### 'V Pitot Tube Leak 

### Check+ 

### i"'

.. ), "!-, f 

### Field Data

.... , 0 o )o o '"

**·~** "I 'I t.:

**~'w •"~**  • • o Traverse·



## . Pomc ·. Number. 

## .

**Vei'o~~~ ·~end**  **~p ~Debes**  · ... :.: .. :

**B1~** '· ·: --t•. ·, .. .· stack · : .: .

**rc~perafure.** Off 

### l , : . . . . · • ·. ·

**~ ~C:loni~**  **.~owp~~~~~Pef:oli** ,



## .

**·~** 

## ......

**:::·~.** 

## :: :':·

... ;·.,· .:.;
.. J/i·

.. 

## c.··:: ....

**~·~·** 

## .. ;

**~** _·. :

! • 4 ·, .,·

Averages


### Stack Temperature, Dry, °F (A)-----

**D~eren~(A-B)** 

### ________ __ i' •,.;-·;,.·• I . •, 

### .. 

## <Aogie\vblch Yields a



### Niill.~P 

## ·: •••• !

**Ap~ .a~**  0° Reference



### ...



### {),

**D~** 

# ()

.. £1/

**~~** 

# O·CH (} 10? 

# '1 t) I 

### ()l/ 

# &cOl,

**~** 

# (), Dt. 

# v . ., 

### ? 

# 0 0 

# 0

**o~ot.J** 

## 010) 

# f 

# oro') 0 I 

## D.) 

# 7 

# o.o'-1 0· t)f" 

# G

. '

. : ...

**~;** 

### Stack Temperature, Wet Of (B)------ 

### Preliminary Percent Moisture------ 

## (p 

## ? 2 

## 0 

# u f..J



### ~ 

# .q,

**Comm~u------------------------------------**


## 39

### EPA Metltod 2- Field Data Slteet

Client Florim City, State Clarksville. TN Sampling Location

**...t:B=a~gh~ou~se~O::r.:u=tl~et** _________ Project Number

**.........,08c...-l"-Z'O~O** -------- 

### Run Date 

### I { 

# /1 CO 

## J 0$ Operators 

### BAJ6, 

### J1t. Pitot Tube I.D. No. 

### D 

### q ll 

## S] Leak Check+ 

## j' 1 

## 0
Run Number 

### 1 2 

### 3 Time (24-Hour Clock)

**~\S"** 

### '1'50 t\l) Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 

### 'l. "'\ 

## .'6"6 '2..0,

**.f6~**

**'l.~ ~'6**  Static Pressure, H 2 0 Stack Te.a-np., Dry, °F Stack Temp., Wet, Of Moisture,%

**T~avcrsc** .

Polot

**~timb~r** 

# A-) 1.



## ~ 

# I

**-~**



# -~

Averages : Vcloc:ltj

**Hca~~P** .. ,

. Inc:heS. HaO

.



# .. )\

.'1 

# c

**~)** 

## ..



# . t.Cr,

**.1~1** 

# -.

**~)_**

**·-.~~ -.~)_** 

: · ·- , "' '• ., j' t.: ;·:: :; ' , · - ,···.,• • ., ·· • l· '• s.'l•

.. ·r'- 1 •• •• •i •· , . . , •· •· .,;"1""• ·•'.

- ·,, '1. •• .... • • . ,.._ ,· .•



### . .

**~ra~k··.** 

### · ··

**V:eloc:i~.** 

### ·.: ....

**·.::'.sfoc~:'~:···;;·** :·
...

**~.~vc!o~i·ty:' ::::-~:::·s~·~:.~··~·:;·'**  **'vei~citf:** 

### .. ,

**·~" ':·~st~d<.:·.;**  Temperature

. . .

**Hea~** ap. ·. .

**~(~e~pe~~~e.:**

**~** 

### ):::

**l~c~:~** Ap I 

### Temperature

**:li~ci** Ap :··': :

**1;~pe.,8tu;e** · · °F ·. ·:· · · iaic:h·es.J:IaO 

### 1.>.

**·.:.::.~:** 

### . .'·::·

.. - .

**.Inche~** H20 .•, \:.

**:~i~:~.~F-.** 

### ':· 

# ,:>:

**I~.c~e;:·HaO.';** 

### · / 

## ··.:·op·.:·\·

**~** 

## ..

• 1(

**'l~l**



### .J-1



# 40

### Field Data Slteet- EPA Metllod 6 -,Sulfur Dioxide Client _Florim.
____________________ _ City/State _Clarksville, TN
_________________ _ Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet

Bar. Press., ln. Hg 

## Jet. Y.[ Static Press., In. H20

- •}



### ~ Meter Box 

### No. 

### G· '}OQ,)

.. \ Sample Box No. 

### ___._\l.,.__

__

0 

## s 10 IS 

### 20 

### 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 

### 60

**Im~inger** Sample ID No.



## ~ 

# i l>O .- I/
Y 

## = 0 'fCtC:f Observer 

## .J, f1



## (~l'i 

# A" \.7o')....
Probe No. --.,---- Probe Temp. Setting )..C)b 

### Agency _1"--¥-P.Io..Lh..;;;;..L

__ Start Time

**_fs'::..~=-:...1** 

### __ _ _SwnpJe

**~:'** · '..

**~.** ·· · · ·· 

### Flow

**Rate~.·** 

### . 

### DiY Oas · · · ·:: 

### Pump

. l:iPM

**~** i. •. 

### Meter:.: 0 

### Vacuum 1'\

**"·:·.:~.**

**~- .Temp~~~**  F:

.. Inohes

**~-** _::· .:.

**~.** · Average·.... · :.Hg··.



### · Analysis of Moisture Recovery
1 

### 2 

### 3 Final Weight, mg 

### "7'0 

# ,-a-o 100 

### Initial Weight mg 

# I, 0 \00

**~[)0** 

### NetGain,mg



## ...

**~'-)** 

# Jo

**Q~** Run Number

-------
Operators 

## G.Lu

**~.** 

## Q'l.n,

LEAK CHECKS 

### Pre-Test 

## 0 

## ,oo'l @_£_In. 

### Hg. Post-Test 

## '"OOf @jy_ln,Hg. End Time 

# lJ ),\ 24 • 

### Hr



### 4 **~j,.·:·** .Temp

.op ··.·.



### SG 

### 1. ,'i,:'J

**~ou**

**1~.?**



## 41

### Field Data Sheet- EPA Method 6 -sulfur Dioxide Client _Florim.

_____________________ _ City/State _Clarksville, TN

__________________ _ Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet

### ~frq'] Bar. Press., In. Hg

___ _

## ~lo0-77.. Sample ID**No._..;......;:..::....._.....;.....;~** Static Press., In. H 2 0

- 

### 0 '

## l~ Meter Box No. ( •**~\\Q~-** \ Sample Box No. 

### --L:\'l:;;....._

__ Y= (),'IQL{ Observer 

## 6.**hr~~ ~)It**  'i.lt>").. Probe No. Agency

### T~ 

## [L Probe Temp. Setting 

## 2 'S' D Start Time '\ 

### &..1 

# t;;'

· •• ! Clock · Time

0 5 10 

### 15 20 

### 25 30 35 40 45 

## so 55 

### 60



### Impinger Final Weight, mg Initial Weight, m2 

### NetGain,mg A11a/ysis 

### of Moisture Recovery 

### 1 2 

### 3**~~b 1li'V~-H-v**  tOO 

### \91'\ \ 

# "'" ·\00**-~ ~'f)**  't) RunNwnber 

# _1

_____ _ Date ""'"'"'

.. D

## ~ Operators 

### J A(,, 

### (;Lv(_

LEAK CHECKS Pre- Test 

### (0. ol):l- @ 

## _jQ_ In. Hg. Post· Test 

## b 

## 'Du 

# l @ 

# _ff_ In. Hg. End Time 

# l 0 4

### ~ 24
- Hr



### 4 

### SG ')lo.<" 

### ?o1J**'l-1>.~**



## 42

### Field Data Slleet- EPA Metl1od 6 -8uifur Dioxide ;.l't.-t..
Client _Florim:...---------------------- City/State _Clarksville, 

## TM------------------- Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet SampleiDNo.



# ~ lov "'} 

# :7 Bar. Press., In. Hg 

### 2. 

### 6f 

## "'ll!J Static Press., 

### In. H20 _j 

# '7 'L Y 

## = 

# o. '\'\"{ Observer 

# \L br<klf (J...j Probe No.

------ Agency 

## 'TIJ 

# e L Meter Box No.

**t.-£~·** 

## \ Sample Box No.__._\)===---- Probe Temp. Setting l 5\:) Start Time ____,\...1.&\J..c)..;:.__

__

·. . '

**·~** 

## .

**ci~·ck•** 

## :. Tune· · 

## · .. ,:,• >'·

. 0 5 'i ..::,

**~** •• 

### <./

_,

**.~~:** l ·, 10

**~,rl,** 

## 4). ,· 

### ...

**~** .. ·:··



### .... :··
.. 15 

### 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 

### 60


### Analysis of Moisture Recovery Impinger 

### 1 2 

### 3 

### Final Weight, mg 7('\ 

### J1D 

### lee; Initial Weight, rng 1(.)\) 

## lou

**1l)~** 

### NetGain,mg 

## --ou C..\ f)

**~** 

### .... 

# -- Rtm Nwnber 

# t/T'Dftfl 3
Date 

### \1 

## -Jif ...£> 

### fl Operators .J 

### A L 1 

## E: W'=-

LEAK CHECKS 

### Pre- Test (') I 

## oDZ. @ 

# lk_ In. Hg. Post-Test @

__ In. Hg. End Time 

### t )... \').. 24

- Hr



### 4 SG

**2;1-(,~11,.**



### '2.-00 d.D1

**~** 

# ('Jr.V

··-----

43

### Field Data Slteet- EPA Method 26- 

### Hydrogen Clzloride & 

### Fluoride Client _Florim

______________________ _ City/State _Clarksville, 1N

__________________ _ Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet

Bar. Press., In. Hg

# l'"~~ Sample ID No. 

# 4to0"'1
Static Press., 

### In. }hO

.. 

## 1')....- y =**DPll.\~** Observer 

# ,.J. /lrGt:U.c·"f
Meter Box No. 

# 'J. a; 

### l**~** 

### \ Probe No. Agency

### --n~c. Sample Box No. \1 L17 

## r-\ Probe Temp. Setting 

### ');;OJ Start Time**-g).~** Run Number------- Date**I\-\~'"'-'~** Operators 

### ,I A f... 1 

### (;tv£.-

LEAK CHECKS Pre-Test

## ~**.~** l 

### @_l (p_Jn. Hg. Post· Test 

### D · 

## DD**~** @ 

## l!:L_ In. Hg. Erid Time 

### <?t .\..\ 24 • Hr

# D~';f**'~~~~~·~i~l~i ~:~i** **--~~-.** : Clock**Tqn:~,·**

0 5 10 15 20 25. 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 i)..C,t!;M

... '.**:·~** 

## .. ·:''

.. 

# 17/J**.(p~** Analysis of Moisture Recovery Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 Final**~um.e_,** 

### m1 

### Initial**Vo~e,** 

### ml 30 

### Net**Condens~olume,** 

### ml 

### Impinger Absorbin)'-S.Qlution NaOH Final 

### Volume, ml

### ~ Initial Volume, ml**~15** 

### Net Condensed Volume, ml 

# ' Total Condensed Volume, ml



# 44

### Field Data Slleet- EPA Method 

### 26- Hydrogen C/zlorlde & 

### Fluoride Client _Florim

______________________ _ City/State _Clarksville, 

### TN

__________________ _ Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet Sample ID No. 

## C£ I·DQ

.... 

# 5 Bar. Press., In. Hg

### '1~**.~~** Static Press., In. H20

.... 

## 3 1..

## 8A~~ A 

### L Y 

## = . 5:1 Observer 

# rJ, (il 

### (P,a&.-e'J Meter Box No. V C6±**~\** 

### Probe No.

------ Sample Box No.

### ~ 

### ·vo"Jt '' 

### I Probe Temp. Setting

.. J_ 

## SC>

D 

## l-0**:/,~:2::~Y~t.** :.f:·, ' /1')

.. 

### 04 

### lot.**l~**

### :;:iL.~~r:**e~~·:(;·~.** '1Clt.)1

### ;~;~~~;;~:·?:',.\:.;**~~>'** 

## )\.r;l 

## ;**:;j:f;L;{~;** 

## · .:,
.. ·.::.: .'

.. ::. Agency r@ 

# £C..

Start Time

.

### ~ ..._.

### ~



## I \ 1'1



# , I 

# 1:!> 1-l.{**~** 

### ) 

# .., ") 

### 1... Run Number 

## _2

______ _ Date 

### \'\-\$ 

### ·o( Operators 

## .l \\[... 1 

### C"'-L.

LEAK CHECKS 

### Pre· Test 

## X>;O I @LIn. 

### Hg. 

## ' lO Post-Test**1~·** 0 \ @

__ In. Hg. End Time

### t~t~} 24- 

### Hr**~'\,** 

### '"Q).

### -.~5~~i~?~\**.:.~.~** 

# :\. '1 ')' 

## '2 2s**~s** \riC> 

## .tGI**~~,·:~: c:.~** **:~··.::\:i~~;;** 

## tlo 2



### A11alysis of 

### Moisture Recovery Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 Final Volume, ml Initial Volume, 

### m1 30 

### Net Condensed Volume, ml 

### Impinger Absorbing Solution NaOH Final Volume, ml Initial 

### Volume, mi 

### 15 

### Net Condensed Volume, ml Total Condensed Volume, mi


### Percent Silica Gel Spent Final Weight,_g Initial Weight, g 15 

### Net Absorbed Water g

.. :·t:.·
. 

### . . 

### . .

.. ... : .. 

### . 

## .. Total Reagent Collected, g 

## 45

### Field Data Sheet- EPA Metltod 26- 

### Hydroge11 Cillo ride & 

### Fluoride Client _FJorim

______________________ _ City/State _Clarksville, TN

__________________ _ Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet


### Bar. Press., In. Hg 

# 1'1 , 

# %f>
Static Press., In. rhO 

# -u. }1**MeterBoxNo.~+ ~,**  Sample Box No. 

### \JL>1 

## r...- I

Clock Time

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 

## so 55 

### 60 Sample ID No.

## ~**~** 

# DU

- lp
y = 

### OPtY.O,· Observer 

### J. 

### Br

### ~;.,M 

# kY
Probe No. ___,;
____ _ Agency

### --:..T...Jo.oO'-!oG~L-~-- Probe Temp. Setting '1 

### Sb Start Time 

## L\ 

# DOvU.O



## t0.o1. -l(\, \ "')_({(50**~~** 

### .l-t,b 50. l'"> (i,O. '') ·.!'

..... , '.·' •**:~"** ,: ..**:~** .i,:;>:: 

### >: ;,. ·:; . . .

### /o"~"" 

### '60. S) 

### 90

..**~~** 

### tOO c:;).... 

### UD, LL1 \'l-D**.~)-** 

# :**/:~\:\t~tf?. ':u;,~**  

### Analysis of Moisture Recovery Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 Final Volume, ml

. Initial Volume, ml 30 

### Net Condensed Volume, ml Impinger Absorbing Solution NaOH Final Volume, ml Initial Volume, ml 15 

### Net Condensed Volume, ml 

### Total Condensed Volume, ml
Percent Silica Gel Spent Final Weight, g Initial Weight, g 

### 15 Net Absorbed Water, g

:'- 

## .. r.· ... 

### ·- . . . 

### ... 

### ·- . . 

## .. - 

### . .. i

........... · . 

### Total Reagent Collected, g Run Number _).::::.,_

____ _ Date 

## 1-\-**\'6-~55** Operators 

### J 

### t\ L J 

### r.;: lvL

LEAK CHECKS

### Pre-Test~ b

.. D 

### I 

# @__IS_ ln. Hg. Post-Test 

# 'j·**[~I** @-=::?.__In. Hg. End Time

__ I**_:~** ...:..l.....;;;t..;_.

__ 24 • Hr



## 46

### APPENDI.X3



# LABORATORY DATA

47

## EPA Method 6 Analysis

- Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Laboratory Data 

## Sheet Client: Florim USA Project Number: City/State: Clarksville. TN 

### Sample Dates: Sampling Location: 

### Kiln 1 Analyst: PRJ Volume & 

### Normality of Standard Sulfuric Acid Solution: Volume & 

### Normality of Barium Perchlorate Titrant: 1.) 2.) 

### Average Volume & 

### Normality: 

## Analytical Data 08-100 11/18/08 Date: 5.00 ml 4.87 

### m1 4.86 

### m1 4.87 

### ml 11/24/08 0.0100 N 

### 0.0103 N 

### 0.0103 

### N 0.0103 N



### Total Sample Volume of Titrant Vt, ml Sample Sample Sample Aliquot 1st. Number Identification Vol. Vsoln Vol. Va Titration 8100-08 Inlet-Run 1 400 20.0 21.32 8100-08 Inlet-Run 1 

### 400 

### 5.0 5.43 8100-09 Inlet-Run2 400 

### 5.0 5.41 8100-10 Inlet-Run 3 400 

### 5.0 2.93 8100-11 Outlet- Run 1 400 20.0 21.42 8100-11 Outlet-Run 1 

### 400 

### 5.0 5.57 8100-12 Outlet-Run 2 400 5.0 

### 5.93 8100-13 Outlet- 

### Run 3 400 5.0 3.73 8100-14 BlankDI 400 20.0 <0.02

8780 Audit Series C 

### 100 20.0 30.00 8780 Audit Series C 

### 100 5.0 7.49

8100-15 QCID 

### 0592 100 20.0 8.45 

## QC Sample True Values Sample 

### No. True Value

8100-15 .660.0 Obtained Value 660.3 mg/dcsm Percent Recovery 100.1 % 

### 2nd Average Titration Volume

21.30 21.31 

### 5.40 5.42 

### 5.50 5.49 2.95 2.94 21.45 21.44 

### 5.55 5.56 

### 5.95 5.94 3.70 3.72 <0.02 <0.02 30.00 30.00 7.48 7.49

8.40 8.43

Percent Difference 0.1% 

### Notes: The volume for the blank must be the same as that of the sample aliquot. The absolute value for the 1st and 2nd titration must be equal to

**~r** 

### less than 0.2 ml.


# 48**~** f 63 -- --..

• -

[ -

.6:3-- **~~-~**

I CHAIN OF CUSTODY

II **·~** • • .... .A..IR. - ·-- -- - • ...,...c_

•

r. . **~J.** Flo rim USA II • lAM ,.,..T_ .L of ..... . .... .. ... LL ...1

**~~-** , .. ,............... (

**~City** State: Clar· .•• TN ln .. :. ·•N no 1nn 7 6

, **RO)Ylll~** 1• a UJ ... '-&. 0. -- ---

r. Connie James :;- u• **'":.~.,s;** Order:

:.;<:i': ::; . . . • .. . . • ''1. _.;;.. '. • ' ,,-' ..•

1- ·.; - **s~~ple_iD:** :_· **_.·~·j}ate** .- :· .,., . • :T"· ... ·,- ..... :-. -• .

. :: . .:. ·: ,. : ·. ·-. · **~-Sample....,~** ... •p&.auaa ·' .. ·- : .. . . '· and **~~·u** ... **~.** ,.-.-

1.... Inlet Run 1 8100- 8 11/18/2008 13% H202 + DiH20 rinse

Run2 8!00- .2 11/1Rn.OOR 13% H202 + DiH20 rinse

Run3 81_!)0- 10 11/1Rll00&

**l~o/()_H202** + DiH20 rinse

,..., **~•~ ~~**  .1. Run 1 8100- 11 11/}RnOOR 13% 1-1202 + DiH20 rinse

Run2 81_0Q:_ 12

**11~!~@0! llli~02**  + **Di~O __rins~** 

R\1!13 8100- 13 1 t/18/2008 13% H202 + DiH20 rinse

Blank _8!00- 14 !]./!_!/2QQ_8 **l~o/ili202** + DiH20 rinse

Audit 8100- 15 11118/2008 EPA Sample No. 8780

Relinquished By: Dateffime Received By: Dateffime Special Instructions:

Relinquished By: Dateffime Received By: Date/Time

,.. . !. .:I for' ... .Y By: D_!te/fime Aru.,lu'7D for the _ _r_n !. rj J. S02

**-~·** .. **~~---r** L\A **~ ~**  " **~/vt6** o<rw

**'-.......~**

# Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc. 9548-D Mt. Holly Huntersville Rd. Huntersville, NC 28078



# Project No: 08-100

Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride

EPA Method 26A
Analytical Report 

# 11696

Element One, Inc. 5022-C Wrightsville Av., Wilmington. 

### NC 28403 910-793-0128 FAX: 910-792-6853 

## e11ab@e11ab.com



## 50

### The following data for Analytical Report 11696 has been reviewed for completeness, accuracy, adherence to method protocol, and compliance with quality assurance guidelines.

Review 

### by:

Renee Chek, Chemist

D.ecember 4, 2008

Report Reviewed and Finalized 

### By:



# if!~ Ken Smith, Laboratory Director December 4, 2008

e£en1en.tOne



## 51

# SUMMARY OF RESULTS

ehen1:ent0ne



# 52

### Element HCI HF 

## Summary of Analysis Summary of Method 26A Analysis Baghouse Inlet R1 e11696-1 

### Total mg 7.59 4.17 Baghouse Inlet R2 e11696-2 

### Total mg 7·.67 4.40

Bag house Exhaust R 1 Baghouse Exhaust R2 e11696-4 

### Element Total mg 

## -------·----·· 

# -··-··------- HCI 5.45 HF 0.037 e11696-5 

### Total mg



# ···-------

5.58 0.041

Reagent Blank e11696-7 

### Element Total mg HCI 0.076 HF <0.02

eleE-r&entOne

.· .... •' ·- .. ' 

### Baghouse Inlet R3 e11696-3 

### Total mg 4.36 2.46

Baghouse Exhaust R3 e11696-6 

### Tatar mg



# --------

2.87 <0.02**~** '··, r· ..: .. .. :·.·:. •



# 53

# ANALYTICAL NARRATIVE

54

## Element One Analytical Narrative
Client: Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc. Element One 

## #: 11696 Client ID: Florim USA Analyst: RLC Method: M26A Dates Received: 

## 11/20/08 Analytes: HCI & 

### HF Dates Analyzed: 

## 12/03-04/08
Summary of Analysis The samples were prepared and analyzed according to Method 26A protocol. The samples were analyzed for chloride on a Metrohm 761/788 ion chromatograph system.



## Detection Limits The Metrohm reporting limit was 0.1 J.IQ/mL for chloride and fluoride. 

## Analysis QAJQC Duplicate analyses relative percent difference (RPD) and spike recovery data are summarized in the Quality Control section. All 

### QNQC data was within the criteria of the method.



## Additional Comments The reported results have not been corrected for any blank values or spike recovery values.

ef en1:en·\'One

.. 

### . ..

**~**



### -


## 55

# QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY

56

## Summary of Quality Control Data
Summary of Method 26A Duplicate Analysis RPD 

## Baghouse I-R1 Baghouse I-R2 Baghouse I-R3 Element RPD 

# RPD RPD



# -------- 

# -------- -·---- ------------ HCI 0.4o/o 0.3o/o 1.0°/o HF 

## 5.3% 4.4% 2.1%
Baghouse E-R1 Baghouse E-R2 Baghouse E-R3 Element RPD 

## RPD RPD



## -------------- 

# ------------ 

# ------------- 

# ------------ HCI 0.6°/o 1.1°/o 1.2°/o HF 

## 3.0°/o 0.4% NA


## Reagent Blank Element RPD HCI 1.4o/o HF NA



## Summary of Method 26A Spike Recoveries 

## Baghouse I-R3 Baghouse E-R3 Element Recovery Recovery 

# --------. 

# ------ -------- HCI 106% 105% HF 1 06°/o 94%

e£ernent0ne



## 57

# SAMPLE CUSTODY

: .-. "'

.. , -. :-•.

**~.** . . • • ( !

..

**~** .•.• f:

.... ::.

**~-;** .'·

.. **!~.':t** ... . - :··')•: :"'

.. : .-.: .. :.

••

- W- a .- :"', .:.

**~** :
... _:i" ...: t!.



## 58·':)CHA.INOFCUSTODY8100-7-··-····-----....DateffimeReceivedBy:Date/Time

# ANALYTICAL DATA

e:fenref:llt.One



## 60

## HCJ, HFWhere

## Analytical Calculations

Total HX (mg) =X Results (IJg/mL)*Dilution*Final Volume (mL)/1 OOO*Correction Factor

X Results= 

### Raw sampre concentration (ppm)-HC/, HF 10 Data Sheet 

### Dilution= 

### Diluted 

## Volume-to Run Sheet 

### Aliquot Final 

## Volume--sample Submission 

### 1.028= Correction factor for hydrogen chloride 1.053= Correction factor for hydrogen fluoride

<==fernerttOne



## 61

## One AIR 

## DrESTING SAMPLE suBl\.inssuoN FOl:tfVI 

# 11696

lnte rit · Aii Monitorin , Inc. 

### 08-100 

### Analysis Due Date 12.02.08 QA/QC/Report Due**Da~e** 

## ·t 2.04.08 

## ----·--------, i 

### Date Rae.: '11.20.08
J Time

## R~:~:;_ _1......;0;...;;2..;;....0

__ __.

# jHN0**L~ ~** **---~~-H_F_L_o_t--~~--~~j~_H_C_I_L_~_·~-~-~~~~~----~-~._~_-_M_e_fu_o_d_:_~** I Volume Marked@'N

### 1~--v-o-lu_m_e_L_o_ss_Y_____,/Qg:~'~'""·**~--?---fpH** < 

# 2.o{i)N

. 26A



### S I ld ff f

amp:e 

## en 1 

## sea ·1on

. Baghouse Inlet Baghouse Exhaust 

### Blank 1 8100-M26A-R1 

### 4 81 OO-M26A-R 1 7**M26A-Bianr~** 

### 2 

### 81 

### OO-M26A-R2 5 81 OO-M26A-R2 

### 3 81 OO-M26A-R3 6 81 OO-M26A-R3 Analyses Requested Samples 1-7 

### HF, HCI



### ·--···

Runs/FB lmplnger 1,2, & 3 (.1) lmplnger 4 & 5 (.2) NOTE



# --- ! FH lmpinger 1 FH lmpinger 2 FH lmpinger 3 BT BH

LabiD or Combined FH



## - - BV,ml FV,m! BV, ml FV,ml BV,ml FV,ml 3V,ml FV,ml BV,ml**FV~ml ~**  .• j..l \ \



# ----- -----**~** 

# -----·**·~**

## ---~ ........... 

## ·-**·~-** 

### r------- 1 ' I

# ----~ 

# .. 2 

### 2fJ._ 

## "'**~ ~** 

### ~ 

# ----- 

# ----- -.............. -.............. 

# :-:::__

.......... 

### 3.S 

# i-3 

# ..**~** 

# -----**~** 

# -----**~** ............._........,

### ~**~.** 

# -- 4 

### 1**ol:.~** 

### '"'"



# ----- -..............**~ ~**  

# ----- ............._ ...........

# -----~**~ -·--~**  5 

## 81-- 

# ...



# ----- 

# ----- ----- ----- 

# -----**~**

### ~**~** 6.8 

# g -r- .. 

### ·-**~ ~**  

# -----**~**

## ~--**~ ~**  

# ----- R t 

### 81 k



## eagen an s Lab ID Fractions I BV,ml FV 1 ml l\lat•3S 

# I I 

### 7 0.1 N H2S04 I 

## lSLo 0.1 N NaOH

## ~ 

# ----- DIH20 

# --=----- 

# -----

- 

### Lab Communications



### SS Page 

### 1 

### 9/J:. 

# n SSby

# g.~ 11/20/2008 

# t 725:14 PM 

# l**,.u~:** .•. d..:..

## ..:~ \!;·· 

### c::.'<.:--"'\!i.. 

### \t\,d-'- 

# \o<6 10'-=

.**...-~\** - 

### I ·I , "· 

### p . B 

### I :)

.. , ; , . .. , . .4 j."11• 

### rnp I ._I .j 1 

### ep 

## y Date K**?=-~~---1-:J.,** 

### ..**~::..,._.:..l** C:.:...;l-u..___ Imp 4 

### & 5 Prep 

### By I Date

_ ID Verification 

### By/Date 

## ]('[f;' i 1

### f.;?·L;:;.:_~ 

### ·.,_,_':l

__ _

..... _/IVIetronm t\J'I/t()CS ton**~.,.;nromatograpn ~ystem**  

### elementOne 

## M26-HCIIC Data Sheet Lab**~D** 

## # e"l 

## i 696
Client: Integrity Date: 12/03-04/08 Analyst: RLC Detection Limit, (fJgfln[j: 

### 0:10



## cr Final Sample ID pg/ml 

### Dilution Vol,ml



## --------------- 

# ---------- ---------- 

# ---------- LRB 0.000 1 10 LRB DUP 0.000 'I 10 LRB SPK 5.068 10 LRB SPK OUP 

### 4.986 1 10 11696-1 4.246 20 87 11696-1 dup 4.228 20 87 11696-2 4.538 20 82**11696~2** dup 4.552 20 82 11696-3 2.890 20 73 11696-3 dup 2.920 20 73 11696-3 spk 8.346 20 73 11696-3 spl< dup 8.018 20 73 11696-4 4.978 10 106 11696-4 dup 5.008 10 106 11696-5 6.275 10 87 11696-5 dup 6.206 10 87 11696-6 3.227 10 87 11696-6 dup 3.187 10 87 11696-6 spk 8.476 10 87 11696-6 spk dup 

### 8.426 10 87 11696-7 0.428 2 86 11696-7 dup 0.422 2 86

1 of 2 

### Cofumn: Metrosep A Supp 5 

### ElfJent: 3.2 ml\11 Na 2 

### C0 3 

### /1.0**m~Jl NaHC:~.!:;;**  

### Flow Rate: 0. 

### 7ml/min. Cl" to 

### HCI**f41C~or:** 

### 1.028
% I-ICl, 

### Spil'\e, 

### Ftecovery/ Total mg pg/mi



# ---------- ---------- <0 <0 0.052 0.051 7.60 7.57 7.65 7.68 4.34 4.38 '12.5 12.0 

### 5.43 5.46 5.61 5.55 2.89 2:85 7.58 7.54 0.076 0.075 5.00 5.00

5.00 5.00

5.00 5.00**elementOnG~** 

## e 1 '1696-HCI RPD



# ---------- NA '101% 100%
0.4%
0.3%
1.0%**~09%** 102%
0.6%
1.1%
1.2% 105% 104%
1.4% 

### file name**ds·i··;~** dma·



### ___________ 

### .. ___ 

# ---- .............. 

## _. 

## --- sc031355.CHV1i**12/3/'::.CC·~· ~**  3:55 sc031416.CHW**12/3/;~~08** '14:16 sc031437.CHVV 12/3/2C08 14:37 sc031457. CI-IVV 12/3/2-J'JS 14:57 sc032130.CHV\'**12/3/20~18** 21:30 sc032151.CHW 12/3/2;)08 21 :51 sc04-0057. CHW 12/4/2'J(\8 0:57 sc040117.CHW 12/4/2008 'l :17**sc032211.CHV~.o' 12/3/2~108**  22:11 sc032232.CHW**12/3/~2008** 22:32 sc032253.CHV\' 12/3/2-Joa 22:53 sc032313.CHW 12/3/2008 23:13 sc040138.CHVv' '12/4/2008 1 :38 sc040159.CHVV 12/4/2:l08 1:59 sc040219.CHW '12M·/2008 2:19 sc040240.CHW 12/4/2008 2:40 sc04030 1. CHV\1 12/4/2008 3:01 sc040321.CHW 12/4/2008 3:21 sc040342.CHW 12/4/2008 3:42 sc040403.CHW 12/4/2008 4:03 sc040546. CHVV 12/4/2008 5:46 sc040607. CHVV 12/4/2D08 6:07



## ...**S~:**

### ~-; 

# J. 'i**.v,~uullut** , v 111 oo 1v11 viiiUIIIaluyrcJ.Jn .:>ys\em 

### elementOne 

## M26

.. HCIIC Data She·et 

## Lab**~D** 

## # e·t·i696
Client: Integrity Coh.urm: Metrosep A Supp 5 

### Date: 12/03-04/08 Elllent: 3.2 rnM Na 2 

### CQ 3 

### /1.0 mM NaHCC:.1 

### Analyst: RLC Flow Rate: 0.7mL/min. 

### Detection Limit, (IJg/ml): 

### 0.'10 

# cr to HCI factor: 1.028


## cr Standards 

### f.JQ/ml



### _____ 

## .. _________ _________ 

## .. 0 0 0.1 0.103 1 0.851 5 4.86'1 10 10.080 0.1 0.125 1 0.880 5 5.215 10 9.891
Correlation· 0.99978


### DL 0.113 

### DL 0.109 QC 4.676 QC 4.711 QC 4.698 QC 4.667 QC 4.476 QC 4.461 QC 4.473 QC 4.549

2 of2 QC, % IJg/ml 

### Recovery



# ---------

0.10 0.10 5.00 5.00 5.00 

### 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00



### elementOne 

## e 11696-HCI 

# ---------- ·J03% 85% 97% 101% 125% 88% 104% 99%

1'13% 109% 94% 94% 94% 93% 90% 89% 89% 

### 9'1% 

### fila name 

### datr.**t~ma**



### _____ 

## ...... 

# ------

------ ··-··---· -·· sc030932.CHW 12/3/0f 9:32. AM sc030953.CHVI/ 12/3/2008 9:53 sc031014.CH\N 12/3/2008 10:14 sc031034.CHVI/ 12/3/2008 

### 1 0:34- sc03'1 055.CHW 12/3/20C8 :C:55 sc041300.CHW 12/4/2008 '13:00 sc041320.CHW 12/4/20C3 13:20 sc041341.CHW 12/4/2009 13:41 sc041402.CHW 12/4/2008 

### 14:·:32

sc031314.CHW 12/3/2C 

### 08 12.: 14 sc031335.CHW 12/3/2008 '13 :35 sc032334.CHW '12/3/2008 23:34 sc032355.CHW 12/3/2008 

### 23:55 sc040423.CHW 12/4/2008 4:23 sc040444.CHW 12/4/2008 4:44 sc040831.CHVI/ 12/4/2008 S:31 sc040852.CHW 12/4/2008 

### 8:52 sc041158.CHW**~** 2/4/2008 

### 11 :58 sc041422.CHW 12/4/2008 

### 14:22

### 6'~-:t 

# :- (,. ·" JMetrohm 761/788 ion chromatograph system 

## elementOne 

## M26-1-IF IC 

# Data 

# Sheet i**~b** 

# qi) #"

.......**~** .,;: I ' .! U 

### ·j**·~ ,·~)96**  

### Client: Integrity Colun1n: 

## IVIetrosep A Supp 5 Date: 12/03-04/08 Eluent: 3.2 rnM**Na CC~** **11.0** 

## n-,rvi NaHC0 3 

### Analyst: RLC**F~o\.v** 

### Rate: O.?mL/min. 

### Detection Limit, 

## {f.Jg/n11): 

## 0.10 F- 

## to HF 

### factor; 1.053


### '"'o Final HF, Total Spil<e, 

### Recovery/ Sample ID F" pg/n1l 

### Dilution 

### Vol,ml



## --------------- 

## ---------- 

## ---------- 

# ---------- LRB 0.000 10 LRB DUP 0.000 10 LRB SPK 4.688 10 LRB SPKDUP 4.810 1 10 11696-1 2.336 20 87 11696-1 dup 2.2'15 20 87 11696-2 2.492 20 82 11696-2 dup 2.603 20 82 11696-3 1.580 20 73 11696-3 dup 1.613 20 73 11696-3 spk 6.843 20 73 11696-3 spk dup 6.910 20 73 11696-4 0.168 

### 2 106 11696-4 dup 0.163 2 106 11696-5 0.222 2 

### 87 11696-5 dup 0.223 2 87 11696-6 0.087 2 87 11696-6 dup 0.098 2 87 11696-6 spk 4.707 

### 2 87 11696-6 spk dup 4.898 

### 2 87 11696-7 0.081 2 86 11696-7 dup 0.057 

### 2 86

IC-M26-Data-HF 

### 1 of 2 

### mg**~g/ml**


### _______ .,. 

## __



# ---------- <0 <0 0.049 5.00 0.051 

### 5.00 4.28 4.06 4.30 4.49 2.43 2.48 10.5 5.00 10.6 5.00 0.037 0.036 0.041 0.041 <0.02
< 0.02 0.862 5.00 0.897 5.00
< 0.02 < 0.02



### eletnentOne



## e 11696-HF 

# RPD

---------- NA 94% 96%
5.3%
4.4%
2.1% 105% 106%
3.0%
0.4%



### N,A, 92% 96% 

## NA fil·a nat-ne:


## -·-------------· sc03'1355.CHV'/ sc03'l416.CHvV sc03'1437 

### .CH\:'J sc031457.Crh'·/ sc032130. C 

### H'JV sc032151.CH'.JV sc040057.CH'N**sc040117.CH~t"J** sc03221'1.CH'N sc03L232.CHv

.. ;**sc03~253.CHVV** sc032313.CH\V sc040750.CHVJ sc040811.CH\.V sc040954.CH\N sc041 014.CH\IV sc041035.CH'Jv' sc041056.CHVV sc041'!16.CHVI/ sc041137.CI-IV" sc040546.CHVV sc040607 .CH\1'/ 

### date 

### time



# -------------- ·:2/3/2008 13:55 12/3/2008 14:16 't2/3/2008 14:37 

### 'i 2/3/2008 14:57 '12/3/2008 21 :30 '12/3/2008 21:51 '12/4/2008 0:57 '12/4/2008 1:17 12/3/2008 22:11 '12/3/2008 22:32 12/3/2008 22:53 12/3/2008 23:13 12/4/2008 7:50 12/4/2008 8:11 12/4/2008 9:54 12/4/2008 10:14 12/4/2008 1 0:35 '1:2/4/2008 1 0:56 12/4/2008 11 : 16 '12/4/2008 11:37 '12/4/2008 5:46 12/4/2008 6:07



# .·Sf**,~1** (.". 0Metrohm 761/788 ion chromatograph system 

## elementOne M26-HF IC
Client: Integrity Date: 12/03-04/08 Analyst: RLC 

## Detection Limit, {1-Jg/rrn&): 

## 0.10

Standards 

### F 1lg/n11



## --------------- 

# ---------- 0 0.000 0.1 0.082 

### 1 0.9i9 

### 5 4.839 10 10.085 0.1 0.097 0.874 5 5.441 10 10.3'18 

### Correlation

.. 0.99980

DL 0.098 DL 0.084 QC 5.022 QC 4.891 QC 4.958 QC 5.030 QC 5.075 QC 5.034 QC 5.064 QC 4.980

IC-M26-Data-HF 

### 2 of 

### 2 

## Data Sheet 

# la:b H)#: ··r
..**~<CH6** 

### Column: Metrosep A Supp 5

Efuent: 3.2 

## 111M Na 2 

### C0 

## 3 

## /1.0**111~11** 

## hlaHC03**F~ow** 

## Rate: 0. ?t11L/n

.. 

## 1in. F" to 

## IHF. factur: 

## 1.053 QC, IJg/rnl



# ----------

0.10 0.10 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00



### elementOne



## e 11696-HF 

### o/o Recovery



## ----------

82% 92% 97% 101% 97% 87% 109% 193%

98% 84% 100% 98% 99% 101% 102% ·f01% 101% 100% 

### file tuame


# --··---·· ------···· sc03C932.CH'J'./ sc030953.CH\"l sc031 

### 0 14.CH\·'v sc03'l034.CH'N sc031"055.CH\'V sc041300. CH'N sc041320.CH\V sc041341. CH\N sc041402. 

### CH\N

sc031:314.CH'N sc031335.CHW**sc032334.CHV~/** sc032355.CHVV sc040423.CH\N sc040444.CHV 1 / sc040831.CHVV sc040852.CHV'/ sc041158.CHVV sc041422. 

### C 

### HV1/ 

### date time



# --------------- ·: 2/3/2008 9:32 '! 2/3/2008 9:53 '12/3/2008 1 0: 14 12/3/2008 

### 1 0:34 12/3/2008 10:55 12/4/2008 13:00 12/4/2008 13:20 1214/2008 13:41 12/4/2008 14:02

12/3/2008 13:14

12/3/08 13:35 •J2/3/08 23:34**~** 2/3/08 23:55 12/4/08 4:23 12/4/08 4:44 12/4/08 8:31 12/4/08 8:52 12/4/08 11:58 12/4/08 14:22



# 66**~·~·1** 

# 7

## elementOne**~C** 

## Sample 

## Sheet/Diges.titn·a**ViJor~ts.heet**
Date:

### 1~/ oj

### l·~>~ Analyst: 

## fZ L L 

### Batch name: 

### 1 ' 1r.**~** ,:_, 

### 1:: .-**,~ ~**  j

....**~ ~**  _,, ,;!..v _. ..,. 4 -.,qo' • ...,- 

### Column: Metmsep A Supp 5 Eluent: 3.2 mM Na 2 

### C0 3 

### /1.0mM Nai-IC03 Flow Rate: .7 rnL!min. Method: ) f.:? 

## tq
AS LOC. Sampie ID 

### Client Analyte F.Vol.(n1l}

# wetg;(;J=;~:;.~~-r spu1e(ug/mtJ I CJ 

## e..CL-n '· n

### '·~ 

### bl L**rv-~·-·-** 

### I
•-I

## ~ 

# o.c j 

## o., 

# 'i }. 0 

### -· 

# r 5 !:),(.) I 

# r=-- j 

### ((- /0.0 

# 7 Qc. I

### ~ Qc_. 

# I £1 

# 13! a_,, 

### f:;_ 

# Io Bl Ctn 

### L 

## ' l \ 

## DL 

# r- I
1 1_. 

### J;l, 

## DL. 

## I i



### - i 

## JJ LK.lS 

## I 

# i'1 J_f-(3 

# (.)**L~·--f** 

# p 15**)_~~ s,<-·~~**  

# Jtp /..,{!./!. .5f? /;'ft..L;C.' 

# &0 I**H.~** 

### t:; te

.... . 

### f 

# ::f;,,f. 

# F,ct ,!) ('·

.. ·


### ... 

# , (


### .... .., 

# U.t --1 

### DirtP 

# ;

- 

# &!J.

·- .<.. 

## i.**~** 

### .... i 

## 1 

# u3 -]**Otq~** j j 

## ·--r·-··- 

# -- l.o'-( 

# -:s ::)t'tt- 

### j I 

## Lqs -6 Sf';!:.. Oi.r:O

## ~ 

# /..otp Qc.. 

# l..i7- Qc l 

## (off 

# Bt a11 

## t'""

# ~**~l7** 

# I**~~=~** Cai.Standard Lot# 

## 0g05L2**::~(** QC Lot# 

### ()8 

### (5**o~O** Comments:



### ------------------------------------------------------- Spike 50 uL from 1000 ug/mL Std. to 10mL sample Lot #'s: 

## rc Solution A 

### .IC Solutfon 

## s

_________ _ Submitted for QC- 

### Date:**J~'lf()'-{(o~** Time: /t.{)t:;' 

### By: 

# Rt c:... QC Review-

### Date:IJ.(~c.r{M Time: 

### ./t.{6S' By: 

### s?,·.c

### R•Te~Req~~~No**~ ~s** **Comme~~------~~---------------~~-----~~-** Re-Submltted for QC- Date: Time: 

### By:

____ QC Review- Date: Time: 

### _By:

___ _

## elementOne
Date: l). 

# t o.:>f 0 

### <s Analyst: 

## r2. L.L 

### Column: Metrosep A Supp 5 Eluent: 3.2 mf\1 Na 2 

### C0 3 

## /1.0niM NaHC0 3 

### Batch name: 

## 1 ;;to3c.\

.... , 

## i 4 , 

### "·i L: Flow Rate: . 7 ml/min.
AS LOC. 

### Sampk-:J lD 

# &9 ''fro 

# I I 

## f I 

# 1 ' ;
r: -- J(tp_Cp-<.'

.... r'l.. I f : ' i 

## .,J:=i":L; 

## ":lJ 

# I**1~2.** 

## I 

# '13 

# ·1y '15 1-f.t; 

# 'f:r 1-g 1-&1 6'1) 

# 8"l .8".1 

# 8•3 

# 8l( 8"5

Cai.Standard Lot# QC Lot# Comments:

_____________ _ Spike 50 ul from.1000 ug/mL Std. to 10mL sample Lot#•s: IC Solution A IC Solution 8.

______ _ Submitted for QC- Date: Time: By: QC Review- Date: Time:

___ By:.

__ _**R•Te~Requim~No** Yes**Commen~:** ______________________ _ Re-Submitted for QC- Date: Time: 

### By:

___ QC Review- Date:

___ Time:;

___ 

### By:

.. ___ _

## elementOne ·, .:·JI.(.; 'Li'"J**;~.** . , .' .;, qtl-:

-···**~** lJa. ··- u·



### Date: Analyst: 

## R.l.(.,· Column: Metrof:: epA Supp 5 Eluent: 3.2 ml\1**l\la CO~**  

### 1.0mM NaHC0 3 

### Batch name: 

### Flow Rate: . 7 rnUmin. Method:

### ~)L.; 

### ,:-1
Client



## : 

# I I 

# i**~~/--!i-** ---1

# =t-~**-=-~-=-~** -=-:

# -t=-~**-=-~ -=-~** **-=-~ -=-~** **-=--~-=:~=-~-=-J=.-i-~=-~ -=-+-~** **-=-~-~=-{-:=- -~=:~r--~------ll-·** **-----~-~~-=~-----~ ~~-----~~--1~--~J--f=~i--~**  l 

# I : I 1-----t------t-----+---,:-**--+----,--,~------1 ~~-------~----------------------t--------------~------------r--------------~----------~·** **~---------------~** 

# I j

## ~----------;-----------------t-----------+--------,1-,**--------+-------+------~--------1 -----+--------~~----------~,----------~--------~----------r--------------~**  I**r------------;---------------------t-----------r-----------~--------t------------~---------.-----------~** 

# i 

# I ·+-------t

# r-~----+-------~------~-------+------------l--------~------~--------~---------1**t----+----..:..,_--+-------f-----------~----1-------4·------L.** 

## _____ -I 

# a--+-----+----+---l---4----1-----··+------t

I 

# I**------~------~----~·-~------~--------~·~----~~·--------~-------~-----------** Cal. Standard Lot#

______ QC Lot #

_________ Comments:

___________________ _ Spike 50 uL from 1000 ug/mL St.j, to 10ml sample Lot Ws: IC Solution A iC Solutions

____ _ Submitted for QC- Date: Time: 

### By: QC Review- Date: Time: 

### By:

__ _**Re-TestRequi~d-No ·~s** **Comments:~---~----------~--~------------~** Re-Submitted for QC- Date: Time: 

### By:

___ QC Review- Date:

___ Time:

____ • 

### By:

__ _Systemauion.f)!J{J.Il_m/!aninu.•JOO.Q.smtJOO.thmlaninu:;.Wf}O.smtanionf}tJf).U.smtuuiont.lfJO.fl.sm;r111i011S.10U.O.:smtmtlrltl<JO!UI.!!IIIIr/1/iOII.f.:Qfi,(J.:;u/1lt:ttit•IUUlliiJIIS30tJ.(}.:mll300.n.smt30n.n.•mranionsJOO.O.sn11anions30fJ.!J••nllit,,t300.0..mulllliOIU300.0.smlanions300.0.:smtcmiclll$OlliOII.t30Q.O.•tllllnnimu30fl.O.smtmzio•ISJO{}.fl..fmtnnioruJOIJ.O.smtllllfOII.<300.0..ttlltnm'otiSJOO.O..ttlllJOO.O.smt.UJO.fJ.smtt/lliiJII-r3•i0.0.::mtalliOIIS.lQfJ.O.:sn/1OlliOII:S,;QQ.O_tll/1anions300./J..smtcwiOIISJ0(}.0..flllltmio11sJO(}.Q.smtauiou.•.wn.O.ssut;miut:s.WO.O.snulllliOII.<.WO.O_t/111DllionsJQQ.O.smtIdent1171-1-11/]/.1-flliJ(J.f3117/fr-13QC8/rmk1169$-11/69$-111698-3iJIJ9j-l1/698-j11698-6IJ.i5().JJ.:!I/<150-51.'!.dupQC8/a,l:1/696-11/696-1dup11696-J11696-.lclup1/696-3spk/1696-.ispkdupQCQCRlaukBlank/1694-111496-!:/up11696-4l/696-4dup11696-511696-.(cl11p1/696-61/696-6d11p1/696-GspkI1696-6.tpkdiiJ'QC··.•·l·il·i!'i:it:_;1920212223242526272629303132333460616263646566676869'10717273747576777879eo'.•.}t:·i..i.-.":•.).I1•.!!fl)10.0·10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.01U.O10.010.010.010.010.010.0i10.0.10.010.0'10.0'10.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0:10.010.010.0:10.0:.!·•i·:-!11•i1.01.01.0·1.0·t.o1.01.01.01.01.0·1.01.01.01.01.01.0·1.01.01.01.01.0.1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0,._,:1I.:;j:.,...)1....I)1n1!"·10;1I!J1.01.0'1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0.1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0.1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0i•......t!f·:1:•.·'ti1............:.:i}l:.t.:n1'Jt1nt)::J(li•'11:.1.1."100.0100.0100.0,100.0·100.0100.0100.0;100.0'100.0100.0.100.0100.0·100.0100.0:100.0100.0.100.0:100.0100.0i100.0:100.0100.0100.0.100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0.100.0·100.0100.0100.0100.01oo.o:100.0100.0100.0;Page1·.•I}.;00000o·00000000000000o·00000.000Q.000:00o'0SampleInfo10-CtLit)o.08''-1..c1-=-..O:iJ3C.lo.10'1C.t-:::.5.0L·9(./:;!.4·.&J91,.,wc...3-=-o.o3':;J.1\MJ,:i::.:o.O(fi..;SampleInfo2lN ('. -.J

.. - r- System

ldent

Sample Info
2 **t111iOII:J~-- QC----~-** 
-- '81·--·--10.0 OlliOIIJ J()O.IJ.mtl
8/mrk

82 10.0

1.0 :mi01u )1/0.tl.f/111
8/mrk

83 10.0

1.0

100.0 .111illlli .:IJt}
f) ilPtl

1 lo9r,

7

04 H}.O

1.0
1.0 100.0

0

C1 '::::r.:.,.,,z_

**~· ~;·-~:~,**  **,,ujc~:L'** .:tJ(J tJu,JIII

I iti96-i dup

35 10.0

1.0
1.0 100.0

0

0 f". Ci. 2X (I -.:. :_-.. -LLJ?. 11/!;m;., 3tJI),rJ..w;;

.... r.J **!?)q~r-:**

85 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0

0 P. Cl. !.\

... **~** .. **"'u:it~::.\** )IJii.tJ

.. t;JU .LU,!Jt>-h!up·'

ff/ 10.0

1.0
1.0 100.0

0

0 F Ct • .:'X , :llliorrs .UJI>.O

.. •mt **.,J.J.6!1f1~-**

88 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0

0 F.('[, 2.\' **~1im•r** 3GO.O.smt

. .J).fj!){j.).tllfP=-

89 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0

0 F. C/.1.\' ,,;,u .wn O.sml

•. ..J.+/ilJ:r-J•'

90 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0

0 F. Cl. J.\' .... :_.,,, ;ao.n ""' **.1J.fclt:...;..~!**

.. r

91 10.0

1.0
1.0 100.0

0

0 F. Cl. ?X :mico11.r J(J(J Osmt

. Wi!14 **::r~-**

92 10.0

1.0
1.0 100.0

0

0 f'. Cl. 1X. J.O ppm union-; 300.0.smt **-~~·k.-Jt~**

93 10.0

1.0
1.0 100.0

0

0 F. Cl. JX. .5.1Jppm 011ioTU JflQ.O.smr

QC

94 10.0

1.0
1.0 1(10.0

o.

0 5.0ppm v.:' tlllions .?OQ.O.sntt

QC

95 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0.

o· **05.0p~/** dlliOIIS **.~(}{}.()** snrt Blmrk

96 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0

0

**~** .miofiS JOIJ.tJ.smt
Ola11k

97 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0

0 :;.,r n11ions JOO.O

.. fmf 1/6964

98 10.0
1.0·
1.0· 100.0

o.

0 F. C1.2X F-;;: o., **~** rr ani.vts JOO.O.snu I/6!16-4Jup

99 10.0

1.0

1.0 ·iOO.O

0.

0 F. CJ. 1.'<' **F'";!'-~~ O.flo~**  (111/om JOO.O smt 1!696-5

100 10.0

1.0
1.0 100.0

0:

0 F. CI.JX F:: 0,-'4o o. ;;u-:

.. 3 cu.irm.f JOO.O.fmt 1/fr'J(j.J clup

101 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0:

0 r"'. Ct. '!.X p·:::.
f) .. **:l<~.:.t** (/lliOIIS .ltJ{J.fl

.. **~mt** 11696-6

102 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0

0 F. Cl. **~X** i2f crniom J()(J. il.smt

II 696-6 tfup

103 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

o·

0 F. **Ct.~.\' ~**  :mir.trsJOO.O..smr l/696-6spt

104 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

o·

0 F. ci. 2X ).f) ppm i.J. **"}b~** mtimu JOO.O.:<tJII /1696-6 spl. clup

105 10.0
·J.O•

1.0 100.0

0

0 F. Cl. 2\: J;!J't'"'
;_,. a- "l S" anior:." JOO.o

.. ,m!
QC

106 10.0
1.0·

1.0 100.0

o.

0 S.fJpp_!.JI

**~ uuim1~**  Jon.u_wu
Bfm,k

107 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0;

0 -.r: **.mi,w~** .:1J.?.tJ,.\nlf

!/.0

108 10.0

1.0
1.0 100.0

o.

0

... **~** cmiotiS 300. O.snrt

0.1

109 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0;

0 ./" mriDIIS JOO. O.smt

/.0

110 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

o:

0 ./- anion., .lfJfJ.O.smt

j.f}

111 10.0
1.0:

1.0 100.0

o·

0 **~** cmious JOO.O

.. mu /0.0

112 '10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0:

0 QC

113 10.0

1.0
1.0. 100.0

0

0 5.0pp111 DL

114 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0;

0 0./ ppm Blunk

115 10.0

1.0

1.0 100.0

0

o. - .. ______

.. -· ---
---· **~-----·-**

Page2

## APPENDIX4

CALffiRATION DATA

72APEXINSlRUMENTSMETHOD5POST-TESTCONSOLECALIBRATIONUSINGCALIBRATEDCRffiCALORIFICES5-POINTENGLISHUNITSMeterConsolelnfotmctionCclibnationConditionsConsoleflloddNumberc-5000-1Datelnme24-0ct-0810:00ConsoleNumlter1400BarometricPressure29.59lnHgDGMModelNumbers-200TheoreticalCriticalVacuum113.9lnHgDGMSeriZIINumber9605808CalibrationTechnicianEWCzTheCriticalCoefficient,K".mustbeenteredInEngrJShui111s.CafibraUonDataRunTimeMetertngConsoleCriticalOrificeDGMOriflccVolumeVolumeOuUetTempOuUelTempSerialCoefficientAmbTempBapsedliHInitialFinallnHialFimlNumberlni&l(6)(P,.)(V..J(Vrd)<Y(l,dK'('-JminlnHzOcubicfeeta.d:licfeet"F"Fseeabove2"F12.00.25490.642494.3866973400.23867010.00.60486.053490.6086669480.34856910.01.10516.250522.3888184550.45857311.01.90507.5305162107882630.59347212.03.60494.537507.4717479730.817672ResultsStllndaRlizl:dDataDryGIISMeterCalibrationFadoTRowrateAH@DryGasMeterCriti"lOrificeValueVariationstd&Corr0-75SCFMVattation(V->(Vcrc.>(Y){6V}(AHft)(MH@)cubicfeetd'mcutJ!cfeelcfmcfminH203.6840.3073.6770.3060.9980.0040.3061.476-0.2264.5160.4524.4810.4480.992-o.0010.4481.670-o.0325.9050.590s.an0.5880.9950.0010.5881.7350.0338.4330.7678.3700.7610.993-o.0010.7611.8030.10112.7011.05812.5871.0490.991.-0.0031.0491.8250.1230.994YAvetage1.7024H@AvcrageCammllionFaciDTY,theratloofthereadingofthecallbraUonmeteTtothecitygasmeter.acceptabletoleranceofindividualvaluesfromlheaverageis+-0.02.DateFactors/ConversionsSidTemp528"RSidPress29.92lnHgK,17.647oRfnHgAmbTempActuaJRnaJVacuum(t....,)"FinHg7215.57015.57315.57315.57215.5APEXINSTRUMENTSMETHODSPOST-TESTCONSOLECALIBRATIONUSINGCAUBRATEDCRITICALORIFICES5-POINTENGUSHUNITSMeterConsolelnfonnaUonCallbr.sUonConditionsConsoleModelNumberC.SOOG-3Datelnme24-0ct-OB10:00ConsoleSerialNumber1466BarometricPressure29.59lnHgDGMModels-275TheoreticalCriticalVacuum114.6lnt-lgDGMSerialNumber9605809Caffbr.stlonTechnicianEWC1Forvalidtestresults,UteActualVacuumshouldbe1to21n.HggreaterUlantheTheoreticalCriticalVacuumshownabove.2TheCriticalOrificeCoefficient.K.",mustbeenteredinEngliShunits,(tr"Rm)l(ln.Hg-mln).Callbr.tUonDataRunTimeMeteringC011$olcDGMOrificeVolumeVolumeOuUetTcmpOuUetTempSerialCoemclentAmbTemp6HInitialFinallnillalFinalNumberInitial(9}(P.,)(V,..)(V..,)(1,.)(!,.,)K'(t..m)"*'InliPClibk:feetIDllcfeet"F"Fseeabove2"F10.00:0275.805278.96282BS400.23867211.00.61270.696275.7787885480.34857212.01.10263.451270.6607282550.45857010.01.9tl255.665263.40768n630.59345910.03.70279.166290:0938494730.817673ResultsStandardizedDataDryGasMeterCallbr.stlonFactorFlowratc.4H«l!DryGasMeterCriticalOrificeValueVariationStd&Corr0.75SCFMVariauon(Vmhld))(Vcrhld)){Y)(AH@}(6AH@)cublcfeetcfmcubiefeetdmcfmInH203.0310.3033.0600.3051.0090.0060.3081.561-0.1644.9080.4464.9180.4471.002-0.0010.4471.662-0.0637.0290.5867.0650.5891.0050.0020.5891.7470.0227.6280.7637.6310.7631.000-0.0030.7631.8180.09310.4891.04910.4791.0480.999-0.0041.0481.8370.1121.003YAYela081.725Mf@AverogeINote:ForCalibrationFactorY.theratioofthereadingofthecalibrationmetertothed!ygasmeter,acceplabletoleranceofIndividualvaluesfromlheaverageIs+-0.02.DateFactors/ConversionsStdTemp528StdPress29.92lnHgK,17.647ORTIOHgAmbTempActualFinalVacuumP-.t.)"FinHg7315.57215.57215.57015.57315.524.()cl.()8

### Approved Alternative Method (AL T -009) liJ 

### Alternative Method 5 Post-Test Calibration 

# .£ Florlm USA • November 18, 2008 Baghouse Outlet Run Run Meter Volume Meter Meter Box Bar. 

### Avg. Moi.Wt. Pretest Posttest No. Time Box No. Metered Temp. 

### AH@ Press. AH 

### ·Dry MeterY MeterY 1 60 C-5000-1 43.493 67.3 1.702 29.88 1.70 29.0 0.994 1.023 2 60 C-5000·1 44.328 77.8 1.702 29.88 1.70 29.0 0.994 1.014 3 60 C-5000-1 44.870 81.6 1.702 29.88 1.70 29.0 0.994 1.005 Mean= 0.994 1.014
Bagbouse Inlet Run Run Meter Volume Meter Meter Box Bar. 

### Avg. Moi.Wt. Pretest Posttest No. Time Box No. Metered Temp. AH@ Press. AH 

### Dry MeterY MeterY

1 60 C-5000·3 34.250 68.6 1.725 29.88 1.00 29.0 1.003 1.000 2 60 C-5000·3 34.331 72.4 1.725 29.88 1.00 29.0 1.003 1.002 3 60 C-5000-3 34.397 73.4 1.725 29.88 1.00 29.0 1.003 1.001 Mean= 1.003 1.001



## 75Date:."4/3/2008,..--·Type:.··:NuTech•:·.··.'-NominalDGMFlowInitial(lpm)(liters)B.·:-:-O.QO..·:..·o.o.o..B:·__·o.oo·.:·---=--o.oo.-.--·_·-:o.•.Q.o..·_.B0.00··-o.oo1.:·:-·-o:oo:·_.G.-:.·.o.oo__:.·0100·:···.-·.o.oo'DGMFinal(liters).2]1.··.2.68-:_-:--_..,_2J?8_·5;43"·.·.-:··;:_.PA'i'8:-18.:.BAa.'·--:-,8;14;:.-10;8_4_--:10.86:..J5.24Calibrationperformedby:_EWC......0)BarometricPressure(inHg):l·-:29.65.·-1DryGasMeterVolumeDGMTemp.AverageTotalInitialFinalTemp.(liters){OF)(OF){oF)2.71'·=::_-70::,·:-··:::·'71.5_:·2.68]3t::.r::.:.:;7..73:5't···.2.68-.··;·.'::'="75:0-:5.46-·:-_:<:82'-·-..a1:o·..5.4382....·_.-...5.41::,,'..•.··'·.8.18--.:.86·:__:.-:··,:-.....'·.8.16r-J:at;='b9'1:·>:·-:.aa.o···•.8.14·.·....•"_JJ9;_5.·:.10.84.--··:·9.0·.:·-..:.:.-90.510.86'91.'.92::·::·=91:5·:-15.24...::-_92:'-_·,··-:-,DGMAveragePressureRow{inH20)(liters/min)-0.497··::·''0.6:::::·,OA92':f....·:·.-=·:OA98.·.·.:;1:t:"<·f=1.•.._·::-_:1'.1···,_··0.998-:::•:2>•}:·.'.J_..·-1.507:.··-·:·=?.·.:::::\.):..-..::2.013-:·_-...·3,_6·:=ReferenceMeterType:;Aow..callbrator:.. .Model:··::·:1·_--==-·•••BubbleMeterTotalVolumeAmbientTimeTotalTemperature(min)(liters)(OF)5.02.483{··:'73.0..5.02.460:5.02.488...73.0..'5.05.035:_',5.05.010:....':."5.04.991::··-73.0..-:.5.07.553·..74.0.:'::.·5.07.535__...._..,.=----5.07.523<.:·5.010.065-.__::5.010.065:····:·7.014.112:;··.YcYcAvg%deviationB0.9120.9%0.9180.3%0.930-1.1%0.935B0.3%0.939-0.1%0.940-0.2%0.941B0.2%0.9430.1o/o0.946-0.3%0.949B-0.6%0.949-0.6%0.949-0.6%NominalAow(lpm)Bc=lCJB8..DGMInitial(liters)DGMFinal(liters)BarometricPressure(inHg):l:::=·-29.5·:'-jDryGasMeterVolumeTotal(liters)DGMTemp.InitialFinal(OF)(OF)AverageTemp.(OF)DGMPressure1-'-:..:·,,_.0.00I·......-u·:=:J:.\:..::·.#DIV/01-·1·)·::::::::::·:,_.--::.11·.=·':··Io.ooL=,...:..#DN/01..::1··.::0.00·.d:··..:::-=..:=:=.>d0.00I::·;·:·.......::{:.,,.;:,_J.·:...,-:=:;:::::;<-::_1=.==..o.oo.-::::·=·=··.·;_..·.,.0.000.000.000.000.000.00···.::.0.00"::10.78.:;:10.78:,.·..::-71··.·:':;:::;71·,_:..=.,...":··.71.0'::::.::.''·'.·3.8.;.:·10.69.::,-::..71:::;:·.72::<-···.:'7.1.5..-;'·:-:3.8:·-;.::.=:,,·o.oo-:_=·:··..·.-10.63·:>·10.63Calibrationperfonnedby:_EWCAverageRow(liters/min)h-#DIV/OrIL'.'#DIV/01:-II·'#DIV/0!·I>#OIV/01::·:··fiDIV/01:=.:·:=·#OIV/01::··:·1#QIV/OI-:,..-<·2.059;·..;:·.2.032'::.:·.::·2.012---.;.,.ReferenceMeterType:Row-:.,='Model:oryealoC-uteSIN::102479·.-3.'t="•.:·.•.·..'BubbleMeterTotalVolumeAmbientTimeTotalTemperature(min)(tilers)rF>I#DIV/0!I·..····-:·:I#OIV/0!1·:·:..:·.ItJOIV/01I_.;=;..,_,.#OIV/01······#DIV/0!=:·:·-··:···.:#OIV/0!.:.....-.-;·_..#OIV/0!·;.:...:·.·:..·......#DIV/01:-.·........:.#DIV/011·:;._.·:·;::·.:=";-_•··:..•·5.010295.:.-...:.5.010.160.·..··;:,::72.0:.::5.010.060=...:....·.#OIV/018#DIV/01#DIV/0!#OIV/01#DIV/0!EJ#DIV/01#DJV/01#OIV/01#OIV/01EJ#DIV/01#DJV/01#OIV/0!·0.944B0.9410.9410.938Date:..-···,::::·Type:i:·_::NUJecH/.·.·::.NominalAow(lpm)DGMInitial(liters)DGMFinal(liters)G.:0.00·.L:J·.:._._:_.2.5.08-..BarometricPressure(InHg):l::",.29"65_··.1DryGasMeterVolumeTotal(liters)DGMTemp.InitialAnalCOF)(°F)AverageTemp.(OF)DGMPressure(inH20)BB..o.oo.•10.427.;:";·...63··:::.::·:10.416>.:63::-..:·:-:.:,:64·.::_::;'·:·63:5"·:"·,·.1!4•-'..o.oo...38(h10.386:::-·fi3··.::·::.:·a3;5.-_·1:.4.····AverageRow(liters/min)..498_:::-·.,:.>().490.:;::->_7"0.99.7•':':·:"'?!·1_.oo.z:::.:..:1Ji19'::.:·.·:\.2...::ReferenceMeter··,.":·Model:;o,.Y¢ai.oc-lite.DCL-MSIN:;1Oi419·.:-··.:·,··...BubbleMeterTotalVolumeAmbient.TimeTotalTemperature(min)(liters)(oF)5.02.490".,5.02..471·:···:·74:0:·.:.·5.02.452..5.04.984.··!.5.04.939:-=:-··.·:·115.05.010·'···5.07.615''71.0·...5.07.595''71.0.5.07.600:-:.;:·.._...5.010.130•.j:.72.0·::.::::>.5.010.090:-.;·.72.0·..:·5.010.110:·.•.:72.0:.;::·-:-.YcYcAvg%deviationB0.989-0.4%0.9840.2%0.9830.2%B0.951-1.3%0.9320.7%0.9340.6%0.949B-0.5%0.9420.3%0.9430.2%0.952B-0.8%0.950-0.6%0.955-1.1%NominalAow(Jpm)DGMInitial(liters)DGMFinal(liters)··:··O.OO.X-:··':.···.::·o.oo.·.·.·:-..,..:.,...·::0.00..: .:-::·::.":'·,'::.=-;=<·(:.:_::,_,;:.•:.•;.::_:::..o.oo:::=_,.-·=)::=-::·=BarometricPressure(inHg):I,29.5··IDryGasMeterVolumeTotal(liters)0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000DGMTemp.InitialFinal\F)(.F)AverageTemp.\F)DGMPressure(inH20).·-<·.'.=·.. . ...'':·.:.#QJV/01-::......,..·/·.··.#DIV/0!·::.,.-.·..::•:····..·:.···....···.·,:,·#DIV/01-:...,.:.,·.:,':·:·::·;=.:-···.:::·.......::#OIV/01.:,::-.-.-:.::·0.000·.•·:-:::_:-:·:=·;:::·:.'··::.=:<'·:·_:.:,,:...,._:·:.)#DIV/OL:.t..·=·..=.o.oo.,...,·:10.639,:10.639._·,·:':71::..··..,-_..·:.;:---11.0.:-·.·..=..·,:<10.653.).10.653.''·-71.5·:.:..;.,.<.-:·3.0.....0.00.....:.10.732.10.732.:::'·--.72..··.•._:..,:72<.;,..·.-:·:;72.p:....:_,,·...·.3.0.:.,··:··AverageFlow(rrters/min),:#DIV/01·:..tiOIV/01·:-d#DIV/01:··,_:#DIV/01::-,;.'.#QJV/0!.:::diDIV/OL·II·.=:·;2;()78.:..·:·.2.072:·:;.ReferenceMeterType::Flow•.:·.-,:·,,.'.··:Model:;oryCaloC.Ute:bcl-M·:,·02479.,.·:.:·=·:::.···::·,·BubbleMeterTotalVolumeAmbientTimeTotalTemperature(min)(liters)\F)#DIV/01#DIV/01#OIV/0!:•.#OIV/0!·=··:·:._..:·:·.:·/.:::.:;.#OIV/0!.:::()·....=;...·.·:·:#DIV/0!.....0.0000.0000.0005.010.390........72.05.010.395.....·5.010.360..:73.0·...Calibrationpetformedby:.__YcYcAvg%deviationooiVJOIB#OIV/01#DIV/01#DIV/01#DIV/0!#DIV/01#OIV/0!·#DIVIOIE]#OIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/01#DIV/0!#OIV/0!#DIV/01#DIVIOIB#DJV/01#DIV/01#DIV/01#DIV/01#OIV/0!#DIV/01B0.968#DIV/010.968#DIV/010.956#OIV/01Pre-Test Thermocouple Calibration Form Client 

### City, State Integrity Job No. Date

Equipment

IDNo. 08.176 05.157 07.212

. 07.213 07.214 07.215 03.004 07.338 03.006 03.007 03.303 03.304

03.400 Florlm USA Clarksville, TN 08-100 11/14/08

Equipment Description Pltot Pitot Umb. Adapter Umb. Adapter Umb. Adapter Umb. Adapter

Console Console Console Console Omega HH-25 Omega HH-25

Barometer Reference Barometer No. 14425 Reference Thermometer No. 5039P
Reference Thermometer Thermocouple Allowable Temperature, °F Reading, °F Tolerance, °F 72 72 1.1 72 72 1.1 72 72 1.1 72 73 1.1 72 72 1.1 72 72 1.1 72 72 1 '1 72 72 1 '1 72 72 1.1 72 72 1 '1 72 71 1.1 72 72 1.1

Reference Barometer Barometric Pres. Reading 29.24 29.26 Performed By: EWC



# 80Post· Test Thermocouple Calibration Form D Client Florim USA 

# A City, State Clarksville, TN

**A~•** MONitOIUNO • ..C. Integrity Job No. 08-100 Date 11/21/08 Reference Barometer No. 14425 Stack Temp (Max) 341°F Reference Thermometer No. 5039P
Reference Equipment Equipment Thermometer Thermocouple Allowable

ID No. Description Temperature, °F Reading, °F Tolerance, °F 08.176 Pltot 352 351 5.3 05.157 Pltot 352 352 5.3 07.212 Umb. Adapter 68 67 1.0 07.213 Umb. Adapter 68 88 1.0 07.214 Umb. Adapter 68 88 

### 1.0 07.215 Umb. Adapter 68 68 1.0 03.004 Console 68 68 1.0 07.338 Console 68 88 1.0 03.006 Console 68 68 1.0 03.007 Console 68 68 1.0 03.303 Omega HH-25 352 350 5.3 03.304 Omega HH-25 352 352 5.3

Reference Barometer Barometric Pres. Reading 03.400 Barometer 29.44 29.43 Performed 

### By: AJD



## 81

## TYPE "S" PITOT TUBE CALffiRATION FORM Date: 12/2812007 Specifications: Calibrator: JAL A.) Pitot tube assembly 

### must be level. E3 B.) 

### Ifpitot tube is damaged explain under comments section. 

# Jir C.) Z =A Sin 

### y (<0.125) and W =A Sin 9 (<0.03125) D.) ex <10°

**and~** 

### <5° 

# .. 

# _ .... Pitot Tubes Attached to Probes



### I.D. Length al 0 

### a20 

### plo pzo yo eo A, ln. Z,in. W,in. 

### PA,in. PB,in. Dt, in. 

### 03.118 2' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.965 0.000 0.00000 0.483 0.482 0.370 03.119 2' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.370 03.1013' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.965 0.000 0.00000 0.483 0.482 0.372 03.102 3' 0.0 0.0 1.0 

### 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0:482 0.372 03.103 3' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.371 03.104 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.372 03.105 3' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.936 0.000 0.00000 0.468 0.468 0.371 07.128 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.962 0.017 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.372 07.129 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.371 03.106 5' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.935 0.000 0.00000 0.468 0.467 0.372 03.107 5' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.372 03.108 5' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.933 0.000 0.00000 0.467 0.466 0.373 03.109 5' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.960 0.000 0.00000 0.480 0.480 0.373 03.110 5' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.931 0.000 0.00000 0.466 0.465 0.372 03.111 7' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 03.112 7' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.933 0.000 0.00000 0.467 0.466 0.373 03.114 7' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.962' 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.371 03.115 7' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.371 03.113 8' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.934 0.000 0.00000 0.467 0.467 0.371 06.12210' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 06.12310' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.373 03.11612' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.371 03.11712' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.372 07.12415' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 07.12515' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.372 07.12615' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 07.12715' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 Individual Pitot Tubes

03.150 1' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.630 0.000 0.00000 0.315 0.315 0.250 03.1511' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.631 0.000 0.00000 0.316 0.315 0.251 03.152 3' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.373 03.153 3' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.373 03.154 7' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.373 03.15510' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.480 0.480 0.373 05.156 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.630 0.000 0.00000 0.315 0.315 0.251 05.157 7' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.602 0.000 0.00000 0.301 0.301 0.251 05.15810'

. 0.0 0.0 

# o.e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.632 0.000 0.00000 0.316 0.316 0.250 05.159 6' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.632 0.000 0.00000 0.316 0.314 0.250 08.175 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.372 08.176 6' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.965 0.000 0.00000 0.483 0.482 0.374 08.17710' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.373 Comments: Pitot Tubes Required Only Minor Maintenance & 

### Reconditioning



## 82

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALffiRATION FORM THERMOC011.PLES Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature Barometric Pressure, 

### In. Hg: 29.21 Date: 12/28/07 Reference Instrument Serial No.; 14-995-5E Ambient Temperature, 

### Deg. F: 73 Calibrated 

### By: JAL/JAB
Reference Thermocouple Temperature Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentiometer Difference IDNo. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation Degrees 

### F Degrees 

### F Percent,% 

### Omega BH-25 KF Dry Bulb 03.301 1 Water Bath 75 74 

### 0.19 2 Water Bath 144 144 0.00 3 Oil Bath 325 326 -0.13 Omega HH-25 KF Wet Bulb 03.301 

### 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 2 Water Bath 144 145 -0.17 3 Oil Bath 325 325 0.00 Omega 

### HH-25 KF 

### Dry Bulb 03.302 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 2 Water Bath 144 146 -0.33 3 Oil Bath 325 325 0.00 Omega HH-25 KF Wet Bulb 03.302 1 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 

### 2 Water Bath 144 144 0.00 

### 3 Oil Bath 325 326 -0.13 Omega 

### HH·25 KF Dry Bulb 03.303 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 2 Water Bath 

### 144 145 -0.17 3 Oil Bath 325 324 0.13 Omega HH-25 KF Dry Bulb 03.303 

### 1 Water Bath 75 74 

### 0.19 2 Water Bath 144 145 -0.17 3 Oil Bath 

### 325 326 -0.13 Omega BH-25 KF Dry Bulb 03.304 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 2 Water Bath 144 144 0.00 3 

### Oil Bath 325 325 0.00

. Omega HE:I-25 KF Dry Bulb 03.304 1 Water Bath 

### 75 75 0.00 2 Water Bath 144 145 -0.17 3 

### Oil Bath 325 326 -0.13



# -------------- ..... 

# ------------------------
.... 

# ------------------------- .. 

# -·-- ............... 

# --------------------------"--

.............. _______ 

# .. Source 

# = Type of calibration 

### system used. Temperature Difference Calculation: 

### (Ref. Temp. Deg. F 

## + 460) ·(Test 

### Temp. Deg. F 

## + 460)

**·-~--------------------------------·---------··-----·--------------·-·-:-** X I 00 = <1.5% 

### Ref. Temp. Deg. F 

## + 460



# 83TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM THERMOCOUPLES TolumC4: +f. 1.5% o£ Absolute TCTIIptralUrc

**B~c** Prwu:c, In. H;: 29.21 Dale! 12/21107 Rcfcrm=Icstruznw Serial No.: 14·993-5! Amblcat Tcmperalllft, Des. F: 74 Cllllbrall:dBy: JALIIJJJ RefcrtACt Tbumoc:oup!e Temperature TbermGcouple,

**Rercre~~ce** Tbermometcr Potmtlomuer Difference mNo. Poll! I Sour co Temperature Tcmperatun Calculatloo DecrccsF De1recsF

**Puce~~t.%** UmbWcal Adaptor Ill 03..201 I Warulblh 40 40 0.00 2 W&ttrBalh 74 75 .0.19 3

**Wr.~~:rBalh** 125 114 0.17 UmhWcal Adapter Nl 03.201 1 WatctBalh 40 40 0.00 2 WaurBalb 74 74 0.00 3 WaterBalh 125 124 0.17 UmbWcal Adapter 113 03.203 1 WattrBath 40 39 0.20 2 W&terBatt. 74 73 0.19 l W&terBIIth 125 124 0.17 timbWcal Adaptor 64 Ol.204 1 Wat=rBillb 40 40 0.00 2 Wat=rBath 74 74 o.oo 3 WaterB.llb 125 124 0.17 UmbiUeal Adaptor 115 03.105 1 Water Bath 40 40 o.oo 2 W&terBilh 74 74 o.oo 3 WattrBilh llS 125 o.ao Umbilical Adaptor liS 03.206 1 Water Bath 40 40 0.00 2 WatuBalh 74 74 0.00 3 Water Bath 125 124 Q.17 Umblllelll Adaptor N7 03.207 1 WatctBatll 40 40 0.00 2 Water Balli 74 ?S .0.19 3 WoterBilh 125 125 0.00 Umblllcal Adaptor !Ia 03.201 1 WotcrBalh .co .co 0,00 2 WDt=rBath 74 74 O,ClCl l

**Wr.~~:rB111h** 12S 125 o.co UmbUlcal Adaptor N9 06.20P 1 WawBtth 40 40 0.00 2 Water Bath 74 73 0.19 3 Water Bath 12S 124 0.11 Umbilical Adaptor 1110 06..210 l

**W~&tBalh** 40 oCC 0,00 2 WaterBalh 74 73 0.19 3 Wat=rBalh ll5 ll5 0,00 Umbilical Adcptor 1111 06.211 I WatcrBtth 40 40 0.00 2 Water Bath 74 75 ..0.19 3

**w~rBalh** 125 126 ..0.17 UmbDJcal Adaptor 1112 07.212 I WatarBalh 40 39 0,20 2 WaurBa.tb 74 73 0.19 3 WatarBitb 1l5 125 0.00 Umbllleal Adaptor 1113 07.213 I Wa!crBith 40 40 0.00 2 Water Bath 74 73 0.19 3 W&tetBa:h ll.S 125 o.oo UmbWcal Adaptor 1114 07,214 I WawBitb 40 40 0,00 2 WawBalb 74 74 0.00 3 Wtt:rBalb l2S ll.S O.GO UmbWtal Adapter N15 07.215 1 WatcrBalh 40 40 O.DD 2 Watc:Bath 74 75 ..0,1!1 3 WuuBa.tb 12S 12.5 o.oo UmbWcd Adaptor 1116 07.216 l WattrB.llb <10 40 o.oo 2 Water Bath 74 ?S ..0.1!.1 3 Water Bath ll.S ll.S o.oo UmhWC&I Adaptor 1117 08.217 I WatetBalh 40 40 0,00 2 WmrBa.lh 74 75 .0,151 3 WatuDath ll.S 125 0.00 Umbilical Adaptor 1#18 OB.lla 1 Water Bath 40 40 0.00 2 Watl!fBath 74 75 .C.l!l 3 Water Bath 12S 125 o.oo Umbilical Adaptor IIVOST 1 03.209 1 WatcrB&th 40 40 0.00 2 Water Bath 74 ··74 0.00 l Water Beth 12S 124 0.17 Umb!Utal Adaptor IIVOST 2 03.210 1 WatarBalh 40 40 0.00 2 Wiler Bath 74 73 0.19 3 W&tuBath 125 124 O.J? SoutCO • Type or callbntioo

**sy~tcmused.** 0 Tcmperalllro Di:fl'tr== Calcubliou: 

# A (&£ Temp. Dcg. P +

**4~0)** • (Test Temp. Dc.g. P + 460) X 100•<1.5% Rtt TCIIIp. Des. F + ¢60


# 84

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM THERMOCOUPLES Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature
I 

### Barometric Pressure, In. 

### Hg: 29.21 Date: 12/28/07 Reference Instrument Serial No.: 14-995-5E Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 74 Calibrated By:

**J~/JAB** 

# -----------·--·- .. 

# ·-····· .. 

# ·---- ....................... ______________________________________________________________________________________ 

### Reference Thermocouple Temperature Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentiometer Difference IDNo. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation Degrees F 

### Degrees 

### F Percent,% 3' Pitot 05.156 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 2 Water Bath 145 145 0.00 3 Oil Bath 322 323 -0.13 7' 

### Pitot 05.157 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 2 Water Bath 145 146 -0.17 3 Oil Bath 322 324 -0.26 10' Pitot 05.158 1 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 2 

### Water Bath 145 144 0.17 3 Oil 

### Bath 322 321 0.13 7' 

### Pitot 05.159 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 2 Water Bath 145 146 -0.17 

### 3 Oil Bath 322 347 -3.20 3' Pitot 08.175 1 Water Bath 73 73 0.00 2 

### Water Bath 156 156 0.00 3 

### Oil Bath 315 316 -0.13 6' Pitot 08.176 

### Water Bath 73 73 0.00 2 

### Water Bath 156 156 0.00 3 Oil Bath 315 314 0.13 10' Pitot 08.177 Water Bath 73 73 0.00 2 

### Water Bath 156 

### 155 0.16 3 Oil Bath 315 315 0.00 Temperature Difference Calculation: (Ref. Temp. Deg. F 

### + 460)

- (Test Temp. Deg. F 

### + 460)

--------·-··--·---------·-------------------------------·-······-····--· X 100 = 

### <1. 5% 

### Ref. Temp. Deg. F 

### + 460



# 85

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALffiRATION FOR.iVI THERMOCOUPLES Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 

### 29.19 Date: 12/27/07 Reference Instrument Serial No.: 14-995-5E Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 74 Calibrated By: JAL


### Thermocouple Reference ID No. Point Source 

### DGM Inlet/Outlet 

### 03.001 

### 1 (2010-IV) 2 

### DGM Inlet/Outlet 

### 03.002 (2010-V) DGM Inlet/Outlet 

### 03.004 (C-5000-1) DGM Inlet/Outlet 

### 03.005 (C-5000-2) 

### DGM Inlet/Outlet 07.338 (C-5000-3) DGM Inlet/Outlet 3 

### 1 2 3 1 2 3 

### 1 

### 2 3 

### 1 2 3 

### 03.003 1 (RAC) 

### 2 3 

### DGM Outlet 

### 03.003 1 (RAC) 2 

### 3 DGM Inlet/Outlet 

### 03.006 1 VOST-1 2 

### 3 

### DGM Inlet/Outlet 

### 03.007 1 VOST-2 2 

### 3 Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath
Water Bath Water Bath Water 

### Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath
Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water. Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath
Water Bath Water Bath Water Bath

Source 

## = Type of calibration system used. Reference Thermometer Temperature

Degrees F 

### 40 

### 73 120 40 73 

### 120 40 73 

### 120
40 

### 72 122 

### 42 75 120 40 72 122 40 72 

### 122 40 72 

### 122
40 

### 72 122

Temperature Difference Calculation: (Ref. Temp. Deg. F 

### + 460)

- (Test Temp. beg. F 

### + 460) Thermocouple Potentiometer Temperature

Degrees F 

### 40 

### 72 120 40 

### 73 121 40 

### 72 119 40 72 121 

### 42 76 121 41 72 

### 121 40 72 121 41 

### .72 122
41 73 123

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- X 100 ""' <1.5% Ref. Temp. Deg. F 

### + 460 Temperature Difference Calculation Percent,% 

### 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.17 0.00 0.19 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 -0.19 -0.17 -0.20 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.17 -0.20 0.00 0.00 -0.20 -0.19 -0.17

D 

# A

.. 

# _ .... 

# 86

### Technical Information Bulletin D-453-5/2005 

## Page lof2

453 National 

### Weather Service Type 

# PRI co Fortin type 

# mercurial 

# Barometers

Revised 5/2005 

# Manufac-tured by 

# PRINCO·IN·STRUMENTS·, INC. 

# 1020 Industrial 

# B-lvd. Southampton, 

# Pa. 189·66·-4095 

# U.S.A. 

# w.·eb Site: www.princoinstruments.com

**Tel~phone:·** 

# 215 

# 355-1500 Fax.: .215 355-7766

87

### Technical Information Bulletin D-453-5/2005 Page 2of2

Technical Information on Scales and Mercury Measurement Each scale Is set at the factory by comparison with a scale cert!fled by the Nationallnstltute of Standards and Technology (N.I.S.T.)·. They read the local station pressure VJ!thout the necessity of correcting for capillary depression. The standard temperature forthe density 9f mercury Is 32•F or 

### Q·c. Mercury expands, becoming less dense, with Increasing temperature. The effect of the. expansion of mercury Is about 10 times. as great as that of the expansion of the brass and scales

.. Since th.e barometer will pro.bably not'be near32°F or 

## ooc, for high accuracy It Is importapt to apply the terpperature ccirrectlof1 to reduce your reading to mercury at standard temperature. The standard·.temperature for English scales Is 62°F and that for metric scales Is 

## a· c. This means that an English scale will appear contracted relative to. a metric scale, when "Viewed at the same temperature, without the temperature correction applied·. If It Is desired to conve.rt an English reading to a metric reading; or vice**vers~,** always apply the temperature correction(s) In the. proper system(s),.before. making the conversion. The barometer barrel is made of brass. The barometer scale has a coefficient of thennal expansiQn**~ssenUally** equal to that of brass. Because standard materlals.are used,**s~an~ard** combin.ed temperature correction tables, such as Tables 4 and 

### 5; and equatlons,·glv.en below, may be used. The reading of the barometer is also affected by gravity (Vvfllch Is affected by the oblate spheroid shape of· the earth) and the centrifugal force ofthe rotation of the earth, all of which vary with·Jatltude. Tlie combined gravity correction Is generally smaller than the temperature correction. At. a given latltudei the· multiplier for gravity. correction will be a cont?tant. Standard gravity corrections are given In Tables 6 arid 7, or you can compute.the multiplier for gravity correction for your exact latitude using-the equation glve.n below. Our MS Excel2000 Spreadsheet for Automatic Barometer**CQrr~ctlons** (Table 1) computes all**ofth~** corrections exactly. ·


### Certification of 

### Traceability and Accuracy All PRINCO Fortin type mercurial barometers, Models '45j, 45.3X and 469, have scales· which were set at the. time of manufacture to a near.zero·correctl<:>n by comparison with a Fortin lype

..**mercu~al** barometer whose scales were calibrated traceable to the National Institute of Standards.& Technology (N.I.S.T.). Barometer scales may be read more accurately .than**~he.y_** can be set. For highest a.ccuracy, barometers may· be ordered \'.lith, or returned to the factory for,.a Factory**Ce.rtiflc~te** of Calibration, and the corre.cti.ons contained therein applied to each scale's readings. Fortin type· mercurial barometers are accurate·to :1:0.01 Inches of mercury, :1:0.2 

# mm ofmer.cu·ry, or ±0.3 mb, When carefully set and· read, and ilfter the certificate, temperature, and gravity corrections have been**~pplled.** The thennometer on the barometer is accurate to ±1°F/±0.5°C, lfthe barometer Is not abused in any 

### way, it should never go out of calibration.



## References 1. Letestu, S., "International Meteorological Tables", World Meteorological Organization, WMO-No. 118.TP.94, Geneva, S\\oitzerland, 1966, with amendments through July 1973. 2. List, Robert 

### J., "Smithsonian Meteorological Tables", Srnlthsonian Miscellaneous .Collections, Vol. 114", Publication 4014, Smithsonian Institution Pr.ess, 

## ·sill revised edition .1949, 5 1 h reprint 1.97·1. 3.**~~Manual** ofBarometryt', (WBAN), Volume 1, First Edltlon, U.S. Department ofC.ommer.ce, Weather Bureau, Washington, D.c·., 1.963.



# saDate: 8/28/2007 Certificate#: 13404 

### LABORATORY 

### ACCREDITATION 

### ; BUREAU

ACC'RE!DfTED

lNDUSTRIAL SCALE COMPANY 12828A SUNRISE LANE OAKBORO. NC 28129/ PH# 704 485-4135**QC?:!l_~ration** 

### Date.:

____ •
__**8/2~.:..::;;/2;.;;:0..;:.07.:_.._.** 

### ________ _ cart-# L11SS·i C.11lbratlon



### INTEGRITY AIR MONJTORING,JNC 9220 BEATTIES FORD RD HUNTERSVILLE NC**28078~8** JAMES A LEWIS 704-398-1119**~ext** 

### Calipration Due**D~te:** 

### 8/28/2008 Temperaturef%RH 77 F I 

### %48 

### Calibration Interval: 

### 1 YEARS Recieved 

### Condition: GOOD**~~~~~~~~~~~~--~------------·------..__** 

### ___ .__ 

# __ _ Gage**~~---** 

### 5039P

----- Manufacturer: 

### FISHER Serial Number 5039P Performed 

### By: C. HONEY Model 

### Number 14-99_5-SE 

### Procedure: CP-004 Gage Type: 

### THERMOMETER Calibration Result PASS Gage Description: 20 

### TO 500 X 2 

### DEGREES F 

### THERMOMETER Department:

1 98.0 96.0 1 00.0 97.0 97.0

### ~--··-·---- 197.0 195.0 199.0 197.0 197.0 3 297.0 295.0 299.0 297.0 297.0 

### i_.

____________ _**~----** 397.0__:_

___ ;;.;39:;.;:5;.:.;.0;._

___ __::3:..:9.::..9·:.::::0

_____**___;3:;.;:9~7.:;::.0;.._** 495.0 4'93.0 497.Q. 495.0 397.0 495.0

INDUSTRIAL SCALe ASI·OD8-069A**PSYCH~OMETeR** 30 TO 85% RH200S1107160031 11/7/2006 11/7/2007**INDUSTRIAL-~-** ISc-RTD-1 OTO 1110 DEGReES F RTD PRC200S12300959180000 12/30/2006 12130/2007 This certificate may not be copied. exoept In full, without written oonsent of Industrial Scale Company. /no. Results listed relate only to the Hems that were tested and or oalibrated. Suitability or determination of status of the Instrument for 11 given app//cetion Is the sole responsibility of the user. A cored/ted calibmtlons (Ire per the Scope of Acoredltotlon. Industrial Scale Company, Inc. maintains ll quaflty system that meets or eKceeds tho requlremonts setforth In the following documents: /SO/lEO 17025: 2005(E). ANSUNCSL Z540·1 and ISO 10012-1. All reference standard$ used by this company are tracesb/o 

### to N/ST, fundamental or natural constants or by accepted ratio metric or comparative techniques. Tolerance Omits listed are the manufacturer's published from reoongnlzed sources for the listed Instrument, or as specmed by the customer. Statements of verdicts or status are based on these limits without the oa/ou!Btlon of each measurement uncertB!nly.

AJdhorlzod Slgnsture: 

# r!Ja.e 

# L ,#Cl"11J( Oslo Propsrod: 

# 8'- ;;. g'- 

## c:J 

# J

89Purchase Ordtr #: '9308 Cllont: Precision Weighing Inc Address: Stanley R Hall 111 Mcoco Bridge Rd Clly,& Slato: Taylors, SC 29687 Dolo Rocolvod: OS DEC 2007 Dato Callbratod: 06 DEC 2007 to 07 DEC 2007 Temperature Range: 20.8610 21.811"C Prouure Range: 727.6to

**730.~** mmHo RotAtive Humidity Range: 4810 50fo Air Density: 1.1<108 to 1.1<479 mgtcm•

**~** lndlcatca now weiAbt Traceable Report fl: 1365004A QD Indicates As Found >= To! HIST Certlncate tl: 822/272801-08 822127 4Da 1.()6 Tested By: 12 Procedure: Modified SubsUtuUon (WIOS-0023) Contractor Raq Recall Dalo: 12131/0B Primary Standard Calibration Data: 11103106 Duo: 11/03110 Description of Wolghts: 1 mg-200g Polish ad Kit, Cla.ss "1", SIN P927 Although thoro 1111 two NIST

**n~o~mbcrs,** ono or bolh m•y apply.

**C2!l~!!!JIIS!nBI** Mass !;;orr Unc. StDndard Set Used Assumod Nominal Alii Found As Loft K=2 Tot. Balnnco Callbralocl/due Donslty Value I d. (mg) (mg) (mg) (ms;) Used MM·DD·YYIMM•DD•YY

. (glcm•) 1 mg 0.00512 0.00512 0.00085 0.010 5010 K594Q

**09~14-07/12~14·07** 7.95 2 mg 0.00507 0.00507 «1.00073 0.010 5010 K5940

**09-14-07/12~14·07** 7.95 5 mg 0.00304 0.00304 -90.00069 0.010 5010 K5940 09-14-07/12·14·07 7.95 10 mg 0.00234 0.00234 0.00074 0.010 5010 K594Q 09-14-07/12-14-07 7.95 10 mg 0.00104 0.00104 0.00074 0.010 5010 K594Q 09-1+07/12-14·07 7.95 20 mg 0.00066 0.00065 0.00067 0.010 5010 1<5940 09-14-07/12-14-07 7.95 30 mg 0.00231

. 0.00231 0.00078 0.010 5010 K5940 09-1+07112-14·07 7.95 

### so mg 0.00241 0.00241 0.00091 0.010 5010 K5940 09-14-07/1

**?·14~07** 7.95 100 mg -0.0015 ·0.0015 0.0011 0.010 5010 K5940 09·14-07/12-14·07 7.95 200 mg 0.00227 0.00227 0.00094 0.010 5010 K594Q 09·1 +07/12·14-07 7.95 300 m'g -0.0043 -0.0043 0.0011 0.010 5010 K594Q 09·14-07/12·14-07 .7.95 500 mg ·0.0014 ·0.0014 0.0012 0.010 5010 K594Q 09·14·07 /12-14-07 7.95

1 g 0.0022 0.0022 0.0020 0.034 5010 K5940 09-14-07/12·14·07 7.95 2 g -0.0034 -0.0034 0.0026 0.034 5010 KS940 09·1+07/12-14-07 7.95 3 g ·0.0163 -0.0163 0.0036 0.034 5010 K5940 09·14·07/12-14·07 7.95 5 g 0.0062 0.0062 0.0056 0.034 5010 K5940 09-14-07/12-14-07 7.95 10 g ·0.021 -0.021 0.013 0.050 6760 K5940 09-14·07/12-14·07 7.95 20 g 0.008 0.008 0.012 0.074 6760 K5940 09·14·07/12-14·07 7.95 30 g ·0.055 0.041 !XI 0.021 6.074 9730 K5940 09·14·07/12-14·07 7.95 50 g ·0.099 0,067 [g) 0.027 0.12 9730 K594Q

**09-14~07/12·14·07** 7.95 100 g ·0.104 -0.104 0.061 0.25 9730 K5940 09·14·0 7/12-14-07 7.95

Cheek '1111111 your 1ocDI st11to ogancy ror col'iliiCauon 01 comi)CinCG on t:GIIIOIOI"IradC llamD. Prepared By: MM*M&iiA& §f M 

### fi9iiB 

# RICELAJKE"' PRECISION SOlUTIONS 230 West Coleman Streol • Rlco Lake,

**Wlll~868** • USA TEL: 715-234·0171 • FAX: 716·234·6967 Page 1 of 2 pages



# ~~ antli\Oti(ob loch

Thl1l ropor\ Is not to bo usod to ciNm PI'OCb:loncoraament b)' Rico LokO Wlllgh!ng Systomr or ony ogoney ollho U.S. Govornmont. This docvmontahall not bo raproducod, oxccpl !n IUU, wUhouttno written cpprowt ol Rico I.Dko

**Wolg~** Syatems' Motrolo(w l.llbOiatory. The ar:sovo unco.1n1nlv coas not lnclldo o c:omocnenl for mliOmallc orooariv or hllfldllna anct uao.



## 90'chase Ord11r #: ,..,,ont; Address: Clly & Stato: Date Rocolved: Date Callbrolod: Temperature Range: PttS$urc Rango: Relative Humidity Range: Air Density: Traccablo Roport fl: NIST Cortlncato #: 9308 Proc:Jslon Weighing Inc Stanley R Hall 111 Meoco Bridge Rd Taylon. SC 29697 05 DEC2007 06 DEC 2007 to 07 DEC 2007 20.86 to 21.BB •c 727.6 to 730.3 mmHg 481o50% 1.14011 1o 1.1479 mglcm» 1365004A 8221272BD1.06 8221274081.08 Although thoro aro two NIST numbars, ono or both may apply.

Nominal Valu11 200g ld. Conyantlonal Mass Corr. As Found As L.oft

(mg) (mg) 0.248 0.246 Unc. K=2 (mg) 0.060 ToJ, (mg} 0.50 :··**~** Indicate• new wvlllhl llD lndlcatu As Found >• Tol

Standard Set Us ad Balance Calibrated/duo

Used MM·DD·YYIMM·DD·YY e190 K5940 09-14-07/12·14·07

Cilock**~en** \'01..11'**iac:alalolll~~goncy** iOi cvltiicaUoli Ol cOii'lP!Iiitlce on lcgaf.ior-tziida**~ems.** Assumed Density (glcm')

7.95

Prepared By: • 

# RICE LAKE .. ·De -·· Page 2 of 2 pages Dated 07 DEC 2007

# &~- PRECISION SOLUTIONS "toiiUMD 230 Wesl Cola!TWl Slloat • Rl:::o Loko, WI 54868 • USA TEL: 716·234·9171 • FAX! 71!1·234·8987

This ropon 13 nolto Do uDCCSio claim PIO<Iuc:t endanlcmenl by Rico l.elco Weighing Svstoms or O.'ll' OGOI'ICY ollhG u.s. Govornmont. This doeumont Jhall not bCiroptOCiuCOCI,**e=ep~ln** lui, wllhou1 tho**¥~rillcn approv~**  al AJco l.llko**Wa~ling** Systems· Molrology Labora\o,ry. Tho a.bOYO Ul11:011alniY clooa nollnoludO II oomootiCnt lOt IMGI1Itllc IVODIVIY or hMd51'10 end \1511.



## 91

## J.?!·er::.is7.i.in

.. 

# T't

**-87~0** 

## h ·i.nJq

...... ,_ 

### 1949 E,.:.atlS 

### Road 

## Cru.-y, North Carolina 27513 

### (919)

**678~t'J-0?'7** 

# Weight Set - 

# Verification Certificate

Manufacturer: Mettler Weight Set Class: 

## s

Balance: AE2oo Serial Number: SV-22470 Serial Number. N6187(5 Verification Date: 12-Jun-oa Balance Cal. Date: June 12. 2008 Vorlficntion Due date:

**Jun~9** NIST Traceable#: Pg2.7 Customer Name: Integrity Air Standards Cal. Date: 06-Dec-07 Contact Name: Paul Jenkins Standards Due Date: December-aS Location: Lab

Location Type&Class Serial# 

## l Nominal Value(g) 

## I Actual Value(g)

Lab Stainless Steel 

## s SV-22470 0.001 0.0009 Lab Stainless Steel 

## s SV-22470 0.002

**o.oox~t** Lab Stainless Steel 

## s

**SV-2~470** 0.003 0.0031 Lab Stainless Steel 

## s SV-22470 o.oos 0.0050 

### Lab Stainless Steel 

## s SV-22470 0.01 0.0100 Lab Stainless Steel 

## s SV-22470 0.02 0.0200 Lab Stainless Steel 

## s SV-22470 0.0_3 0.0300 Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 o.os o.osoo Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 0.1 0.1000 

### Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22.470 0.2 0.2000 Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 0.3 0.3000 

### Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 o.s o.sooo Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 1 1.0000 Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 2 2.0000 lab Stainless Steel S S\7-22470 3 3.oooo Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 5 s.oooo 

### Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 10 10.0000 Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 20 20.0001 

### Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 30 30.0004 

### Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 50 50.0004 

### Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 100 lOO.OOU

Technician:



### ~A1Jl.E 'I 

### R. II, LL Date: 12-June-08
Customer: Date:



## 92

## 1949 Evans Road Cary, North Carolina 27513 Phone: (919) 678-0077 tlr 

### Fax: (919) 678-0075 

### Email: pweighing@aol.com 

# BALANCE CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION

Calibration Date: 12 Jun 08 Calibration due date: Jun 09 SOP: 2000
Balance ID 

### #: N-A Type/Model: Mettler AE 200 S/N: N61876 Dept: Lab Room Number: 

### 1 Tolerance 

### +/- : 

# I Weight set ID# 

# I NIST Test Number 

# I Cal Date 

# I Cal Due 

# I P927 1365004A 06 Dec 07 Dec08

Weight Before Cal Readings Difference After Cal Readings Difference Tolerances Standard fal ( g ) 

### { g ) ( g } ( g ) +1- (g) 

### 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2 0.2000 0.0000 0.2000 0.0000 0.0002

1 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0010 10 9.9998 -0.0002 10.0000 0.0000 0.0100 50 49.9993 -0.0007 50.0000 0.0000 0.0500 200 199.9969

. -0.0031 200.0000 0.0000 0.2000 

### Before Calibration Readings: After Calibration Readings:

·Comments: In Tolerance: 

# 418 Out of Tolerance: 

### C) N/A: 

### C) In Tolerance: 

## 48 Out of Tolerance: 

### C) N/A: 

### C)

This certifies that the balance listed above has been serviced and calibrated to manufacturer spec[fications and/or Precision Weighing Standard Operating Procedures with welghts traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 0.1%

Precision Weighing Technician Customer Signature (Review) 

### 12 Jun 

### 08 Date of Service Date of Review



# 93

### 1949 Evans Road Cary, North Carolina**~7513** 

### Phone: (919) 678-0077 " Fax: (919) 678-0075 

### Email: pweighing@aol.com 

# BALANCE CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION

Calibration Date: 12 Jun 08 Calibration due date: Jun 09 SOP: 2000
Balance ID 

### #: N-A Type/Model: Mettler AC 1 00 S/N: C32593 Dept: Lab Room Number: 

### 1 Tolerance+/·: Weight set ID# NIST Test Number Cal Date Cal Due P927 1365004A 06 Dec 07 Dec08

Weight Before Cal Readings Difference After Cal Readings Difference Tolerances Standard ta) ( g ) ( g ) ( g ) { g ) +1- (g) 

### 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000**0~0000** 0.2 0.2000 0.0000 0.2000 0.0000 0.0002



### 1 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0010 

### 5 5.0001 0.0001 5.0000 0.0000 0.0050 10 10.0001 0.0001 10.0000 0.0000 0.0100 50 50.0009 0.0009 50.0000 0.0000 0.0500 

### Before Calibration Readings: After Calibration Readings: In Tolerance: In Tolerance: 

### Out of Tolerance: Out of Tolerance: 

### N/A: N/A: Comments:

This certifies that the balance listed above has been serviced and calibrated to manufacturer specifications and/or Precision Weighing Standard Operating Procedures with weights traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 0.1 

### o/o

Precision Weighing Technician Customer Signature (Review) 

### 12 Jun 08 Date of Service Date of Review



## 94

### APPENDIX5

PRODUCTION DOCUMENTATION



# 95Florim USA Inc. Stack Testing November 18,2008 Product· Sedona Cedar Size M 12x12 Cycle Time • 50 minutes Beginning weight· 2092.2 grams

Run# Start Time Stop Time

1 8:38 8:43 2 10:04 10:09 3 11:19 11:24 Average Pieces/Row Row/5 minutes Pieces/minute Weight/piece (lb) Tile throuhgout (lb/hr) 6 43 51.6 4.61 14,267.51 6 

### 44 52.8 4.61 14 599.32 6 41 49.2 4.61 13,603.91 14,156.91



# 96

### Run


### 1

2

3 Florlm USA Inc. Stack Testing November 18, 2008 Pressure Drop Readings
Presure Drop Time Reading (inches of water) 

### 8:21 1.8 8:36 1.8 8:51 1.8 9:06 1.8 9:21 1.8 9:45 1.8 10:00 1.8 10:15 1.8 10:30 1.8 10:45 1.8 11:12 1.8 11:27 1.8 11:42 1.8 11:57 1.8 12:12 1.8



## 97