alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 3, 2015 Joshua Parker Program Analyst Office of Rulemaking 800 Independence Ave SW., Suite 812 Washington, DC 20591 Re: Amendment to Exemption Application No. FAA

- 2015

- 3617 filed pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

-3617 Dear Mr. Parker, In my original application for the Section 333 Exemption I stated that I sought exemption for the purposes of film sets and commercials. I would like to amend my appli cation to omit these items from my exemption. The application will now seek exemption to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography for Marketing, real estate photography, special event s, wedding cinematography, marine photography, roofing inspection, and landscape imaging over certain areas of the United States. Please contact me should you have any further questions regarding this request to omit information from my application or fu rther questions about my request for exemption. Best Regards, Christopher Mergenthaler Owner Delta Aerial Imaging LLC. 1952 Heritage Grove Cir. Tallahassee, FL 32304
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2737 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on cast stainless 

steel single-piece exhaust gas manifolds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

cast stainless steel single-piece exhaust gas manifolds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAST STAINLESS STEEL SINGLE-PIECE EX4 HAUST GAS MANIFOLDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.94 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 cast stainless steel single-piece exhaust gas manifolds) is 

8 amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2737 IS

1 (1) in the article description, by striking ‘‘sub2 heading 9902.01.50’’ and inserting ‘‘subheading 

3 8409.91.50’’; and 

4 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

5 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

8 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 3.2.1**

 

**ACA CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.**

Incorporated Under the Laws of theState of Delaware

Third Amendment as adopted March 23, 2007to theBYLAWS

as adopted onSeptember 15, 2004andamended on November 17, 2005andamended on May 10, 2006

Article III, Section 1 ofthe Bylaws shall be deleted in its entirety and replacing it with thefollowing:

Section 1.               Number.  The number of directors that shall constitutethe whole board shall initially be nine. The number of directors that shall constitute the whole board shall bedetermined by resolution adopted by the Board of Directors; provided that thenumber of directors shall be no fewer than three and no greater than fourteen.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6200

JULIUS LAWRENCE-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HARRELL WATTS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; MARGARET C. HAMBRICK; J.E. GUNJA; GARY I. REYNOLDS; ROBERT CENDO; THAO NGUYEN; JOSEPH BROOKS; B. KATTA;A. ZAYAS; J. FAJARDO; C. MENDOZA; Y. APONTERENFRO; A. BLANKENSHIP; PRAKASH KARANVIR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-02-1753-AM) Submitted: May 20, 2003 Decided: May 30, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julius Lawrence-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Julius Lawrence-Bey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U .S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lawrence-Bey v. Watts , No. CA-02-1753-AM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 6, 2003, and entered Jan. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2696 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2696

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on piperazine co-polymerized 
       copolyamide resin high-temperature melt adhesive pellets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on piperazine co-polymerized 
       copolyamide resin high-temperature melt adhesive pellets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIPERAZINE CO-POLYMERIZED COPOLYAMIDE RESIN HIGH-TEMPERATURE 
              MELT ADHESIVE PELLETS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.63 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to piperazine co-polymerized 
copolyamide resin high-temperature melt adhesive pellets) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICKEY CHARLES WILSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 728 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,828
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,164
<PP&E>                                       1,113,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                 793,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,609
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,807
<SALES>                                        106,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,169
<CGS>                                           44,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,376
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,205
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,205
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
A.L. v. TUSCALOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2150806

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2536

  To suspend temporarily the duty on drinking glasses valued not over 
                                 $0.30.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on drinking glasses valued not over 
                                 $0.30.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DRINKING GLASSES VALUED NOT OVER $0.30.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Drinking glasses    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        valued not over                                                    31/2015.......
                        $0.30 (provided
                        for in subheading
                        7013.37.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                         COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


             CWABS REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2004-N
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2004-N


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further
certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                          Dated: March 30, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                     Dated: March 30, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,617]


Ecoquest Holding Corporation, Greenville, TN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 17, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Ecoquest 
Holding Corporation, Greenville, Tennessee.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8941 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2757 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pyromellitic dianhydride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pyromellitic 

dianhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PYROMELLITIC DIANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.14 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 pyromellitic dianhydride) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2757 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of Louisiana v. Chattley CHESTERFIELD

NO. 2017-KO-1210

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Nevertheless, even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a). Contentions not adequately argued in the body of the brief are deemed abandoned. See id.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41120 Conference Calendar

DANIEL LEE MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus VICKI BLANTON, KELLY RUTH PUGH, ROSE MARY GARDNER, LISA CLEMENS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CV-881

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: * Daniel Lee Miller appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of his pro se civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Giving Miller’s brief the liberal construction due pro se pleadings, ** the only challenge it presents to the districtNo. 96-41120 -2- court’s conclusions are those regarding his claims against Blanton. However, Blanton is deceased, and Miller has taken no steps to have the appropriate representative of Blanton’s estate substituted into these proceedings. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED. Gamble v. Thomas , 655 F.2d 568, 569 (5th Cir. 1981); Fed. R. App. P. 43(a). Miller has also filed a motion for oral argument. Because the appeal is dismissed, the motion is DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2989 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2989

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on oxiranemethanol, polymers 
      with reduced methyl esters of reduced polymerized oxidized 
                          tetrafluoroethylene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on oxiranemethanol, polymers 
      with reduced methyl esters of reduced polymerized oxidized 
                          tetrafluoroethylene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OXIRANEMETHANOL, POLYMERS WITH REDUCED METHYL ESTERS OF 
              REDUCED POLYMERIZED OXIDIZED TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.18 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to oxiranemethanol, polymers 
with reduced methyl esters of reduced polymerized oxidized 
tetrafluoroethylene) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

             I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

             1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
             reports on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports
             filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this
             annual report, of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2004-24CB;

             2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
             as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
             fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
             statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
             statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
             period covered by this annual report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
             information required to be provided to the trustee by the master
             servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
             for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
             master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
             agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
             review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in
             the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations
             under that agreement; and

             5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
             the master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing
             standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
             accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
             similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
             similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee, and Litton Loan Servicing LP.


             Date: March 29, 2005


                                              /s/ Steve Bailey
                                              ----------------
                                              Steve Bailey
                                              Senior Managing Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7762

MARCUS T. MITCHELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LESLIE FLEMING, Warden of Keen Mountain Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

UNKNOWN,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Ivan Darnell Davis,

Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-01070-JCC-IDD)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus T. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcus T. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) 

petition for failing to comply with a court order. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Fleming, No. 

1:14-cv-01070-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED