alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, M. H. McIlvain, President and CFO, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Golden Chief
     Resources, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
     the registrant and we have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant is made known to us by others within the Corporation,
          particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
          prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
     over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: October 13, 2006

By: /s/ M. H. McIlvain
----------------------
M. H. McIlvain
President and Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00648

- CV

Mark J. CARRILLO
, Appellant

v. DEACON RECRUITING, INC.and Deacon Professional Services, LLCAppellees DEACON RECRUITING, INC. a nd Deacon Professional Services, LLC, Ap pellees
From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 11039 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 23, 2013

DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
The trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record ha d not
been filed because appellant ha d failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for
preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On
September 27, 2013, appellant was ordered to provide written proof to this court by October 7,

2013, that either (1) the clerk’s fee ha d been paid or arrangements ha d been made to pay the clerk’s
fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. The order stated that i f04

- 13

- 00648

- CV

appellant fail ed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of
prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b).
Because appellant failed to respond to this court’s order, this appeal is dismissed for want
of prosecution. See id . Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
# Official Journal C 13/13 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 13 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6613 January 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 13

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6613 January 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 13/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 13/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 19 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 13/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 13/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

19

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jinglin Shi, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA NUTRIFRUIT GROUP LIMITED (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.

The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 16th day of November, 2009.

/s/ Jinglin ShiJinglin Shi 
Chief Executive Officer  
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nutrifruit Group Limited and will be retained by China Nutrifruit Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
December 12th, 2015

U. S. Department of Transpor tation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of t he FAA Reform Act Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernizati on and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 CFR Part 11, VPI Consultants, LLC, hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) to allow commercial operation of its Small Unmanned Ai rcraft Systems (sUAS) VPI CONSULTANTS, LLC UAS Platform, a DJI S1000+ Octocopter

.
VPI CONSULTANTS, LLC plans to engage in commerc ial UAV services to re sidential, commercial, industrial, and governmental client s in the following applications:

Aerial Videography & Photography, Mapping, and Aerial Assessments; Agriculture Surveys and Assessments; Real Estate Videography & Photography; Damage Assessments Due to Natural Disasters; Public Safety Mapping, Inspections, and Assessments with Search and Rescue; and, Wind Farm Inspections Oil and Gas facility inspections Avalanche inspections

So long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

As detailed in this document, t he requested exemption would pe rmit the operation of sUAS under

controlled conditions in ai rspace that is 1) limited 2) predetermined 3) controlled as to access, and 4) would provide safety enhancements to the already best practices and safety protocols followed by VPI CONSULTANTS, LLC. Approval of this exempt ion would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportations (the FA A Administrators) responsibilities to ...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in t he National Airspace System . Section 333(c) of the
Reform Act.

Thank you for your consideration,

Kyle Preston

VPI Consultants, LLC Owner/Operator

Attachment: VPI Consultant s FAA 333 Exemption Request.pdf
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Yulong Guo, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Yulong GuoYulong Guo
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 6, 2007
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, Stacey L. Moran, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Suffolk Bancorp (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Dated: August 4, 2010 

/s/ Stacey L. Moran 

Stacey L. Moran

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LONGRI NAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73334

Agency No. A099-440-176

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Longri Nan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal,

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

NOV 25 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations

created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.

2010). We deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination,

based on Nan’s inconsistent and admittedly dishonest statements regarding his

place of birth and elementary school, the discrepancy between his testimony and

supporting documentation regarding when he moved, and his failure to provide

corroborating evidence of his employment requested by the IJ. See id. at 1043-44;

Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1093-94 (9th Cir. 2011). The agency was not

compelled to accept Nan’s explanations for these inconsistencies. See Zamanov v.

Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011). In the absence of credible testimony,

Nan’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348

F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Because Nan’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony the BIA found

not credible, and the record does not otherwise compel the conclusion that it is

more likely than not that he will be tortured if returned to China, his CAT claim

also fails. See id. at 1156-57. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 11-73334
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Periodic Financial Reports



I, Lori A. Jones, of Analytical Surveys, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 (the
Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Analytical Surveys, Inc.



Dated: February 14, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Lori A. Jones      
|Lori A. Jones          
|Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 12

CONSENT OF JAN N. HELSEN

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following reports and documents, which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form 40-F of Cardero Resource Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:

1.

The technical report dated August 6, 2005 titled Geological Valuation Report of the Pampa de Pongo Property, Arequipa Department, Caraveli Province, Peru (the Pampa de Pongo Report); and

2.

The annual information form of the Company dated January 25, 2006, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Pampa de Pongo Report, and the properties described therein.







DATED  January 30, 2006



/s/ Jan N. Helson



Jan N. Helsen
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,297]


Hewlett Packard Caribe, BV, LLC, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico; Notice 
of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a Puerto Rico workforce office on behalf of workers 
of Hewlett Packard Caribe, BV, LLC, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico.
    The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8924 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

7 KA 10-01214 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

AKAMEAK KYSER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (ROBERT R. REITTINGER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J.), rendered July 1, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed ( see People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: January 31, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7170

JOHNNIE R. SIMMONS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DALE MORENO, Doctor/Medical Supervisor; MRS. HODGE, Nurse (Practitioner) 

Charge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00520-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: December 16, 2021 Decided: December 20, 2021

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie R. Simmons, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Johnnie R. Simmons, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary 

judgment to Defendants on Simmons’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging deliberate 

indifference to a serious medical need. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Martin v. Duffy, 977 F.3d 294, 

298 (4th Cir. 2020) (stating standard of review). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,626
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             651
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,058
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     35,252
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        272,347
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,164
<DEPOSITS>                                     298,012
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,390
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,762
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,508
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 344,164
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,507
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,058
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   114
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,679
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,938
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,131
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,548
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   9
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,836
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,537
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,537
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,035
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.61
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,706
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,302
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       95
<RECOVERIES>                                         7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,314
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,314
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the amended quarterly report of Medizone International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I, Edwin G. Marshall, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edwin G. Marshall Edwin G. Marshall, Principal Executive Officer  Date: August 11, 2009   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  SLC_278597.1