alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00690-CR

NO. 03-13-00691-CR

Joe Cardona, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-10-202665-A, D-1-DC-10-202666, 

HONORABLE KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of his writ of habeas corpus. The

reporter’s record in these causes was originally due on November 7, 2013. On December 10, 2013,

we notified the court reporter for the 299th District Court, Angela Chambers, that the record was

overdue. On December 16, Chambers notified the Court that another court reporter, Gene Lee, had

transcribed portions of the proceedings and that she needed additional time to coordinate with Lee

and file the record. Subsequently, Chambers informed the Court that she had been unable to locate

Lee and that the telephone numbers and other contact information she had for him were no longer

working. According to Chambers, she has left numerous messages for Lee at a telephone number
given to her by Lee’s former employer, but still has not been able to reach him. To date, the

reporter’s record has not been filed.

Underrule 34.6(f) of the rules of appellate procedure, an appellant is entitled to a new

trial if he timely requested a reporter’s record but a significant portion of the record has been lost or

destroyed through no fault of the appellant’s and if the lost or destroyed portion is necessary to the

resolution of the appeal and cannot be replaced. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f). Accordingly, we abate

this appeal and remand this case to the trial court. The trial court is ordered to hold a hearing to

determine: (1) whether a significant portion of the record has been lost or destroyed, and, if so,

whether a new trial is warranted under Rule 34.6(f), or (2) if the record has not been lost or

destroyed, a reasonable time period in which the reporter’s record can be prepared and filed in this

Court. The trial court shall make appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law with regard

to these issues.

The district clerk shall prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial

court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as well as any orders signed by the trial court. In

addition, the court reporter shall prepare a supplemental reporter’s record containing a transcription

of the hearing. These supplemental records shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court no later

than May 26, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Abated and Remanded

Filed: April 25, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit 99.7





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Exeter Resource Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cecil Bond, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




March 29, 2011
/s/ Cecil BondCecil BondChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 99.3



                        Independent Accountant's Report


          Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)
          One Wachovia Center
          301 South College Street, DC-7
          Charlotte, NC 28288

          U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)
          Corporate Trust Department
          100 Wall Street
          New York, NY 10005


          Re:  STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Securities Series
               ------------------------------------------------------------
               2004-14 (the "Trust")
               ---------------------

          Ladies and Gentlemen:

          We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities,
          Inc. (the "Depositor") and U.S. Bank National Association, (the
          "Trustee" and Together with the Depositor, the "Management") that
          the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material
          respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as
          of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series supplement dated
          as of November 1, 2004 (together, the "Trust Agreement"), in respect
          of the STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Securities Series
          2004-14 (the "Trust"), during the period covered by the annual
          report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust
          for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report").
          Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement.
          Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management's
          assertions based on our examination.

          Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards
          established by the American Institute of Certified Public
          Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
          evidence about the Depositor's and the Trustee's compliance with the
          Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered
          necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
          provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

          In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all
          material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period
          covered by the Annual Report and Management's assertions with
          respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material
          respects, for the year ended December 31, 2004.


          /s/ Aston Bell, CPA
          New York, New York
          March 22, 2005
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Carolyn M. MrozCarolyn M. MrozPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2007By:

/s/ Edmund T. LeonardEdmund T. LeonardChairman of the Board and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             130
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4508
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1225
<INVENTORY>                                         56
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3932
<PP&E>                                           56287
<DEPRECIATION>                                   46504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           479
<OTHER-SE>                                        4764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13908
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4296
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    359
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                359
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       359
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       09
        

</TABLE>
Timothy HENDERSON, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and State of Florida, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-1797

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

         I, David J. Kolibachuk, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust
Certificates, DaimlerChrysler Debenture-Backed Series 2004-8 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in this annual report, taken as a
     whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
     provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee under
     the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in this
     annual report is included in this report;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee
     under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my
     knowledge, except as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has
     fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.   This annual report discloses all significant deficiencies relating to the
     Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar standards
     based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
     conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
     Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
     pooling and servicing or similar agreement, that is included in this
     annual report.

Date: March 27, 2006


/s/ DAVID J. KOLIBACHUK
-----------------------------------
David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President
Offer Letter



 EXHIBIT 10.20 
 Confidential 
 July 14, 2011 

David N. Strohm 
 [Address] 

Dear David: 
 On behalf of Imperva, Inc. (the
“Company”), I am pleased to inform you that the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is interested in having you serve as a member of the Board and as a member of the Board’s Audit Committee. If all
necessary Board and stockholder action is taken, the Company is prepared to offer you the compensation described below in exchange for your performance of certain duties as a director.  

If elected as a member of the Board, you will be offered the opportunity to purchase 100,000 of Company’s Common Stock under the Company’s
Stock Option Plan (the “Initial Shares”), as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), a copy of which will be furnished to you. We expect that you will be appointed to the Board at the Board meeting to be held on
August 17, 2011 and at this meeting the purchase of the Initial Shares would be approved by the Board. The Initial Shares shall vest as follows: 25% of the Initial Shares shall vest after 12 months of service on the Board and the remainder of
the Initial Shares shall vest in 36 equal monthly installments as you continue service on the Board. Such vesting shall commence as of your election to the Board. The vesting of your Initial Shares shall accelerate fully upon a change of control of
the Company pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Plan. In addition, you will be offered the opportunity to purchase an additional 50,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in connection with the Company’s proposed initial
public offering (the “Subsequent Shares”). The Subsequent Shares shall not be subject to vesting. Finally, in connection with the Company’s proposed initial public offering, the Company intends to implement a compensation
policy for members of the Board and you will participate in the program we implement. 
 For so long as you are a member of the Board, the
Company will reimburse you for your reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including reasonable travel expenses, incurred in attending Company Board meetings and committee meetings and in carrying out your duties as a director or committee member.

 You understand that, if elected, you will serve on the Board at the pleasure of the stockholders of Company. You know of no reason why you
would be precluded from serving as a member of the Board or any of its committees, either because of existing competition restrictions or fiduciary duty obligations or otherwise. 
 On behalf of the Company, we are excited about the possibility of having you join us at this critical juncture in our growth and development. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	
	Shlomo Kramer,
	Chief Executive Officer


 Acknowledged and agreed to on 
 this 14th day of July, 2011 
  

	
	/s/ David N. Strohm
	David N. Strohm
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-2175WM

_____________ David Duvall, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Wester n v. * District of Missouri. * Jeffrey Elnicki; Karen Misjak; * [UNPUBLISHED] John Doe, 1 thru 5, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: February 7, 1997 Filed: February 21, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.
Inthis 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, David Duvall claimed tha t Jeff reyElnicki and Karen Misjak conspired to violated Duvall' s First Amendment rights by refu sing to service his student loan and denying him access to public records under the control of th e Misso uri Coordinating Board for Higher Education (CBHE), i n retaliation for his filing a s tate-court lawsuit against the CBHE. Duvall contends the district court improperly granted Elnick i's and Misjak's summary judgment motions. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court correctly ruled that Elnicki was absolutely immune from suit for his advocacy functions as a sta te assistant attorney general and that Misjak and Elnicki (t o the extent Duvall's claims did not involve Elnicki's advocac y functions) were entitled to summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. We also agree with the district court that Duvall' s conspiracy allegations are conclusory and insufficient to es tablish-2-

a meeting of the minds on the part of Elnicki and Misjak to violate Duvall 's constitutional rights. Finally, contrary to Duvall' s vi ew, the district court implicitly denied Duvall's motion fo r additi onal discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f ) anddid not abuse its discretion in making the ruling. We thu s affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2862 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Daminozide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Daminozide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DAMINOZIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Daminozide (N- 

(Dimethylamino) succinamic 

acid (CAS No. 1596–84–5) 

(provided for in subheading 

2928.00.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2862 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Generoso LLEO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3246

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                      Three Months ended         Six Months ended
                                                           June 30,                  June 30,
                                                      2001          2000         2001        2000
                                                   ----------    ----------   ----------  ----------
<S>                                                <C>           <C>          <C>         <C>
Net income..................................       $1,706,406    $  589,759   $2,812,585  $1,268,723
                                                   ==========    ==========   ==========  ==========
Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares..................

Weighted average common shares outstanding..        2,698,746     2,698,746    2,698,746   2,698,746

Shares issued from assumed exercise of
  common stock equivalents(1)...............           19,704            --       17,636         957
                                                   ----------    ----------   ----------  ----------
Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding......        2,718,450     2,698,746    2,716,382   2,699,703
                                                   ==========    ==========   ==========  ==========

Earnings per share:
  Basic.....................................       $      .63    $      .22   $     1.04  $      .47
                                                   ==========    ==========   ==========  ==========
  Diluted...................................       $      .63    $      .22   $     1.04  $      .47
                                                   ==========    ==========   ==========  ==========
</Table>

(1) The number of common stock equivalents excluded from the computation of
    earnings per share because they were antidilutive were 82,135 and 179,030
    for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and 92,925
    and 144,263 for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,684,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    175,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,110,572
<PP&E>                                      36,235,054
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,826,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,000,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,746,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,636
<COMMON>                                       208,140
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,036,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,000,594
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,428,058
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,756,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             497,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,973,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,973,952)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>1

                                                            EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of American Insured Mortgage Investors - Series
85, L.P. (the "Issuer").

I, Cynthia O. Azzara, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(i)      the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
         or 78o(d)); and

(ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Issuer.


                                  AMERICAN INSURED MORTGAGE
                                  INVESTORS - SERIES 85, L.P.
                                  (Registrant)

                                  By:  CRIIMI, Inc.
                                       General Partner


                                  /s/Cynthia O. Azzara
May 6, 2005                       -----------------------------------
-----------                       Cynthia O. Azzara
Date                              Executive Vice President, Chief
                                  Financial Officer and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the General Partner and will be retained by the General Partner and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.