alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VII 

Private Calendar No. 7 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 285 

[Report No. 112–695] 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2012 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 15, 2012 

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 

2 

•S 285 RH

AN ACT 

For the relief of Sopuruchi Chukwueke. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 

3 

•S 285 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Sopuruchi 

7 Chukwueke shall be deemed to have been lawfully admit8 ted to, and remained in, the United States, and shall be 

9 eligible for adjustment of status to that of an alien law10 fully admitted for permanent residence under section 245 

11 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) 

12 upon filing an application for such adjustment of status. 

13 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub14 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust15 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

16 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

17 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

18 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to 

19 Sopuruchi Chukwueke, the Secretary of State shall in20 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

21 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi22 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun23 try of the birth of Sopuruchi Chukwueke under section 

24 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

25 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 

4 

•S 285 RH

1 (d) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

2 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

3 parents, brothers, and sisters of Sopuruchi Victor 

4 Chukwueke shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 

5 accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 

Private Calendar No. 7 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 285 

[Report No. 112–695] 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Sopuruchi Chukwueke. 

NOVEMBER 15, 2012 

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2685 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2685

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-dimethyl-2, 5-hexanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-dimethyl-2, 5-hexanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,5-DIMETHYL-2, 5-HEXANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2,5-Dimethyl-2, 5-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        hexanediol (CAS                                                    31/2015.......
                        No. 110-03-2)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Jinglin Shi, the Chief Executive Officer of
CHINA NUTRIFRUIT GROUP LIMITED (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that: 1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 17th day of February, 2009. /s/ Jinglin
ShiJinglin ShiChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Nutrifruit Group Limited and will be retained by
China Nutrifruit Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2667 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2667

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Vacuum-Grade Ferroniobium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Vacuum-Grade Ferroniobium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VACUUM-GRADE FERRONIOBIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Ferroniobium,       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        containing by                                                      31/2015.......
                        weight less than
                        0.02 percent of
                        phosphorous or
                        sulfur or less
                        than 0.4 percent
                        of silicon
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        7202.93.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion filed November 17, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-11-00299-CV

__________

CHRISTOPHER MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

ANDREA DE LA CRUZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 161st District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. B-114,187

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Upon receiving the docketing statement and a copy of the notice of appeal, it became 

apparent to this court that no final, appealable order had been entered by the trial court because 

appellant’s counsel, Sydney S. Weaver, is attempting to appeal an order disqualifying her. 

Accordingly, the clerk of this court wrote appellant’s counsel on October 20, 2011, informing 

her that it did not appear that this court had jurisdiction because of the absence of an appealable 

order. The clerk’s letter directed appellant’s counsel to respond in writing by November 4, 2011, 

and show grounds to continue this appeal. The clerk’s letter also notified appellant’s counsel
2

that the appeal may be dismissed pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42. See Rule 42.3. Appellant’s

counsel responded to the clerk’s letter by filing a mandamus, but she has not shown grounds to 

continue this appeal.

Appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and only those interlocutory 

orders deemed appealable by the Texas Legislature. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 

191, 195 (Tex. 2001); City of Houston v. Kilburn, 849 S.W.2d 810, 811 (Tex. 1993); see TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 15.003, 51.014(a), (d) (West Supp. 2011). A judgment is 

final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and claims in the record. 

Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. There is no final judgment on the merits in this cause, and the 

underlying action remains pending. Furthermore, there is no statutory exception that allows 

appellant’s counsel to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order disqualifying counsel. See 

Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195; City of Houston, 849 S.W.2d at 811.

Consequently, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

November 17, 2011

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael J. Mauceli, principal executive officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners,
L.P., the managing general partner of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





Date:  April
      2, 2010
                    Reef
      Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.Managing
      General PartnerBy:
      Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC/s/
      Michael J. MauceliMichael
      J. MauceliManager
      and Member(principal executive
      officer)




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the partnership and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6933

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RYAN O’NEIL LANSDOWNE, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:00-cr-00185-TSE-1) 

Submitted: October 21, 2009 Decided: October 30, 2009 

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ryan O’Neil Lansdowne, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph 

Leiser, Kimberly Ann Riley, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Ryan O’Neil Lansdowne appeals the district court’s 

order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant 

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Applying Amendment 706 of the 

Guidelines, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) App. 

C Supp. Amend. 706, the district court reduced Lansdowne’s 

sentence by thirty months to 262 months of imprisonment. 

Finding no reversible error, we affirm. 

 Lansdowne was held responsible for conspiring to 

distribute over 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base, for a base 

offense level of thirty-six under Amendment 706. See USSG 

§§ 1B1.10(b)(1), p.s., 2D1.1(c)(2) (2008). However, because he 

qualified as a career offender, see USSG § 4B1.1(b)(A), his base 

offense level is thirty-seven. See § 4B1.1(b) (“[I]f the 

offense level for a career offender from the table in this 

subsection is greater than the offense level otherwise 

applicable, the offense level from the table in this subsection 

shall apply.”). Applying the three-level reduction for 

acceptance of responsibility, we find that Lansdowne’s total 

offense level is thirty-four. With a criminal history category 

of VI, the amended guidelines range is 262 to 327 months. 

 We therefore find that the district court properly 

reduced Lansdowne’s sentence to 262 months. Although Lansdowne 

argues that he should have received a greater reduction, the 

2 
3 

district court was not authorized to reduce the sentence below 

262 months. Pursuant to USSG § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A), p.s., “the 

court shall not reduce the defendant’s term of imprisonment 

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and this policy statement to a term 

that is less than the minimum of the amended guideline range.” 

As we recently ruled, this limitation is jurisdictional. United 

States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 254 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 

129 S. Ct. 2401 (2009). 

 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
SERVED: JUNE 4, 2010 , . ^- -. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FRANK TERLIZZI 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPI0SO0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0537 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009SO270275) has been assigned to 

the undersigned. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall 

be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service 

List. 

^Ronnie A 

Chief AdministralSve 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10SO0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

William R. Byrne, Respondent's Counsel 

929 Massachusetts Avenue, Level #01 

Cambridge, MA 02139 

TEL: 781-856-9909 

Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000, 

Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER SALCIDO

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 21

- 00 148

- C R

Appeal from the

346 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 9 0D0 2393 )

O R D E R

On September 1, 2021

, Christopher Salcido filed a notice of appeal and requested that this

Court appoint counsel on appeal for him. This Court does not have the authority to appoint

counsel. Therefore, the trial court is ORDERED to appoint counsel to represent Appell ant on

ap peal. The order of appointment shall be filed with the trial court no later than September 13,

2021

. A copy of the order shall be provided to this Court on or before September 15, 2021.

Further, the order of appointment shall be included in the clerk’s record once the issue of

jurisdiction is resolved

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 rd day of September , 20 2 1.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2917 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2917

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Propiconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Propiconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROPICONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.80 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Propiconazole) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
| Exhibit 99.1 **PAYNE FALKNER SMITH & JONES, P.C.**Certified Public Accountants **Report of Independent Auditors on Compliance with Requirements of the Uniform****Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers******Board of Directors and Stockholder of Colonial Savings, F.A. We have examined management's assertion about Colonial Savings, F.A. ("Colonial") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended September 30, 2004, included in the accompanying management's assertion about Colonial's compliance based on our examination. Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Colonial's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Colonial's compliance with the minimum servicing standards. In our opinion, management's assertion that Colonial complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended September 30, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects. ***Payne Falkner Smith & Jones, P.C.*November 10, 2004 10711 Preston Road . Suite 110 . Dallas, TX 75230 . 972 / 404-1226 . Fax 214 / 363-9980** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2855 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bifenazate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bifenazate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIFENAZATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.61 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Bifenazate) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS