alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Attachment 3 Sanitized - Notes Page Page 1 is a Block Diagram with Unit Operations defined

– Release Points are marked in Yellow, with Red BorderProcess Step 1 Process Step 2 Raw Material Recovery Final Intended

Product Refining Aqueous RECOVERY Catalyst RECOVERY Intended Product ToUse Area Reactant TO Waste Catalyst SOLUTION TOWaste CRUDE PRODUCT Catalyst Rich Stream Catalyst 

# PMN Compound **BLOCK DIAGRAM**

2 1 Release Points forPMN Compound Block 1
Block 2 Block 3

Block4 Block 5
Final Distillation PMN Compound WASHING Circulation Intended Product RECOVERY COLUMN PROCESS WASTE Offgas Treatment

RECYCLE Raw Material Catalyst SOLUTION

WASHED PMN Compound TO BOILER Waste STREAMS RECOVERED Raw Material and Intended Product (PMN Compound) LL OFFGAS 

## 3 4 Block4 Block 6 

# Page 1 Release Point 4 – Up to 24682 kg/day to Permitted Incineration for Steam Generation Release Point 5 – Up to 249 kg/day Catalyst to Permitted Deepwell Waste Disposal 

## 5 PMN Compound STORAGE TRUCK LOADING 

## Block 7 6
Thomas and Michelle DEBISH, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee, ON BEHALF OF REGISTERED HOLDERS OF FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-FF6, Appellee.

No. 4D17-469

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 14, 2018]

W. Trent Steele of Steele Law, Hobe Sound, for appellants.

Nicholas Agnello and Erica Gomer of Burr & Forman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The borrowers, Thomas and Michelle Debish, appeal an Amended Final Judgment of Foreclosure. We affirm without discussion as to the borrowers' argument that the plaintiff failed to prove its standing to enforce the lost note. However, because the trial court reestablished the lost note without finding that the borrowers were adequately protected against loss that might occur due to a claim by another person to enforce the lost note, we reverse and remand with directions for the trial court to amend the judgment so as to provide adequate protection to the borrowers. *See**Blitch v. Freedom Mortg. Corp.* , 185 So.3d 645, 646-47 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ; § 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2017).

"Because the court's consideration of the issue of adequate protection is a condition of entering a judgment that reestablishes a lost note, its failure to provide adequate protection, or to make a finding that none is needed under the circumstances, requires reversal and remand for the court to consider the issue." *Blitch* , 185 So.3d at 646. As noted in *Blitch* , the requirement of adequate protection is generally satisfied "through a written indemnification agreement in the final judgment, the posting of a surety bond, a letter of credit, a deposit of cash collateral with the court, or '[s]uch other security as the court may deem appropriate under the circumstances.' " *Id.* (quoting § 702.11(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2014) ).

*Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded for further proceedings.*

Taylor, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 027 -CV

F r e de r ic A. G lad le , A ppe lla nt

v. Dustin L eifh eit, Sam antha Leif heit and Darryl Leifh eit, Appellees

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-06- 0030 26, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESI DING

NO. 03-07-00028- CV

F reder ic A. G ladle Managem ent Trust; F reder ic A. G ladle Li ving T rust; Bar bar a E. G lad le ; B ar bar a Ly nne G lad le M ana ge m e ntTr ust ; B ar bar a Ly nne G lad le Liv ing Tr ust ; A lan Lynn e F am ilyTr ust ; L T Ent e r ta inm e ntCe nt e r , LP ; L T Ent e r ta inm e nt Gr oup, L LC; Alan Lyn ne F am ily Par tnership; Mer iport Capital, Inc.; and T rain, Inc. , Appellan ts
v . Dustin L eifh eit, Sam antha Leif heit, and Darryl Leifh eit , Appellees

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-06- 0039 87 , HO NORAB LE GISELA D. TRIANA , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
T h e s e a p p e a l s w e r e c o n s o l i d a t e d f o r p ur p o s e s o f b r i e f

i n g an d o r a l ar g u m e n t , i f

an y.Appellants have filed an unoppose d motion to ex tend time to file their brie f. See Te x. R. A pp . P. 38.6(d). How ever , appellants a lso state in their motion that they and appe llees have rea ched a
s et t l em en ti np ri n ci p l e a n d n ee d th e a d d i t i o n al t i m e to re d u ce th e te rm s o f t h e s et t l em en tt o wr i t i n g, thu s a lle viatin g the ne e d to fi le br ie fs at a ll. In or de r to a llo w the pa rt ie s a de qu a te tim e to d

ra ft the ir settlement documents without hav i n g t o ask for multi ple extensions, we will abate the c ase. The parties should file a

status r eport in thirty day s to inf orm us if additional time is nece ssary or if we need to se t a brief

ing sc hedule be cause they wer e unable to final i z e t h e settlement. Of c ourse, a motion to di smiss based on settlement may be filed at any

time.

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Pember

ton Abated Filed: August 23, 2007
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 10, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00095

- CR

Juan Leal, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUST ICES PEMBERTON AND F IELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court. Having reviewed the record and

the parties’ argu ments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s

judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment

. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2585 

To suspend temporarily the duty on floor covering and mats, of over 30% 

recycled Polyethylene (PE) or Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA), of the 

kind used for temporary cushioning for children and adults. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on floor covering and mats, 

of over 30% recycled Polyethylene (PE) or EthyleneVinyl Acetate (EVA), of the kind used for temporary 

cushioning for children and adults. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2585 IS

1 SECTION 1. FLOOR COVERING AND MATS, OF OVER 30% RE2 CYCLED POLYETHYLENE (PE) OR ETHYLENE3 VINYL ACETATE (EVA), OF THE KIND USED 

4 FOR TEMPORARY CUSHIONING FOR CHIL5 DREN AND ADULTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Floor covering and mats, of 

over 30% recycled Polyethylene (PE) or EthyleneVinyl Acetate (EVA), of the 

kind used for temporary 

cushioning for children and 

adults (provided for in subheading 4016.91.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

12 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

13 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, J. Peter Farquhar, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tarpon Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 15, 2005                                                                              /s/ J. PETER FARQUHAR   J. Peter Farquhar, Chief   Executive Officer
Norman BABERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3541

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 20, 2018

Norman Babers, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Norman Babers appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Babers alleges a violation of *Brady v. Maryland*, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), as well as two pieces of newly discovered evidence. We affirm regarding the claims of newly discovered evidence without further discussion. As to Babers's *Brady* argument, we remand for the trial court to attach to its order portions of the record conclusively refuting the claim or for an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of Protective Life Insurance Company and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee of Protective
Life Secured Trust 2004-41, (collectively the "Management")
and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee of Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-41 (the "Trust"):

We have examined Management's assertion, included in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)," that the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to the noteholders has occurred as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee during the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting management's assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, Management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria defined in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)."



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, AlabamaMarch 30, 2005











Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust
Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)





Management of the Trust asserts that it has collected payments on the funding agreements and distributed payments to the noteholders as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee for the year ended December 31, 2004.  This assertion is based on the following criteria:

1. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in Protective Life's Secured Trusts P & I Payments: 1/1/04 through 12/31/04 (P & I Payments report).
2. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in the Indenture Trustee's History of Transactions List.
3. The amounts due on the Notes are reported as a component of the charges from Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company, on the Indenture Trustee's Payment Obligation Report System (PORS Report).
4. Charges from Cede & Co. are included in the Indenture Trustee's screen prints titled The Depository Trust Company Activity History Details, which represent the charge confirmations to Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2907 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on difenoconazole. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. CONRAD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on difenoconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 difenoconazole) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ in the column 1 general 

8 rate of duty column and inserting ‘‘2.3%’’; and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2907 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,552]

      ( print page 17994)    
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 11, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of the workers of Datwyler Rubber and Plastic, Marion, South Carolina.

The petitioners requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-8936 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50868 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESSE GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-95-CA-0562

- - - - - - - - - - February 27, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesse Garza, federal prisoner # 43437-080, has filed a “renewed motion for reinstatement,” which this court construes as a motion for reconsideration of this court's single-judge order denying a certificate of appealability (COA). See Fed. R. App. P. 27(c). Garza was not required to obtain a COA to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Lindh v. Murphy , 117 S. Ct. 2059, 2068 (1997). Therefore, his motion for reconsiderationNo. 96-50868 -2- is GRANTED and the March 19, 1997, order denying COA is
RESCINDED. For essentially the same reasons this court denied COA, Garza's appeal of the denial of his § 2255 motion is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and the appeal of the denial of Garza’s post-judgment motion is AFFIRMED because Garza failed to raise an argument specifically challenging that denial.
MOTION GRANTED. ORDER DENYING COA RESCINDED. DISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND AFFIRMED IN PART.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, Michael J. Hagan, the Chief Executive Officer of NutriSystem, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2006 |  | /S/ MICHAEL J. HAGAN                
|                     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50433

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Adolfo Perez Garcia, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:20-CR-175-1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Adolfo Perez Garcia has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Perez Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 14, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50433 Document: 00516200800 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2022
No. 21-50433

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-50433 Document: 00516200800 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/14/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2763 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2763

To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethyl carbonate polymer with 1,6-
                      hexanediol and 2-oxepanone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethyl carbonate polymer with 1,6-
                      hexanediol and 2-oxepanone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIMETHYL CARBONATE POLYMER WITH 1,6-HEXANEDIOL AND 2-
              OXEPANONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Dimethyl carbonate  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polymer with 1,6-                                                  31/2015.......
                        hexanediol and 2-
                        oxepanone (CAS
                        No. 282534-15-0)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3907.99.01)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```