alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

I, Jon Correio, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Electronic Systems Technology Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)[Omitted as permitted by Exchange Act Release No. 47986];
c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 12, 2009

By: /s/ JON CORREIO
Jon Correio
Vice President, Finance and Administration
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2886 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-amino-1,2-propanediol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-amino-1,2-propanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-AMINO-1,2-PROPANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol 

(CAS No. 616–30–8) (provided for in subheading 

2922.19.95) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2886 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3014 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3014

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sodium hypophosphite 
                              monohydrate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sodium hypophosphite 
                              monohydrate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM HYPOPHOSPHITE MONOHYDRATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.44 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to sodium hypophosphite 
monohydrate) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2870 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-(4-Tertbutylphenoxy)cyclohexylprop-2-ynyl sulfite (Propargite) (CAS No. 2312– 

35–8). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-(4-Tertbutylphenoxy)cyclohexylprop-2-ynyl sulfite (Propargite) 

(CAS No. 2312–35–8). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-(4-TERT-BUTYLPHENOXY)CYCLOHEXYLPROP4 2-YNYL SULFITE (PROPARGITE) (CAS NO. 

5 2312–35–8). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.09 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 2-(4-Tert-butylphenoxy)cyclohexylprop-2-ynyl sulfite 

9 (Propargite) (CAS No. 2312–35–8)) is amended by strikVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:43 May 15, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2870.IS S2870

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2870 IS

1 ing the date in the effective period column and inserting 

2 ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-6 Asset-
Backed Certificates, Series 2004-6 (the "Securitization").  Long Beach Mortgage
Company (the "Master Servicer") master services mortgage loans in connection
with the Securitization (the "Mortgage Loans") pursuant to the terms of that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2004 (the
"Servicing Agreement") by and among Long Beach Securities Corp., as depositor,
the Master Servicer, as master servicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company, as trustee (the "Trustee").  Capitalized terms used herein but not
defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Servicing Agreement.

I, James Guerin, an authorized officer of the Master Servicer, certify for the
Benefit of the Depositor, the Trustee, the NIMS Insurer and each Rating Agency
with Respect to the calendar year immediately preceding the date of this
Officer's Certificate (the "Relevant Year"), as follows:

1.  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the Relevant Year
and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Relevant Year.


DATED as of March 1, 2005.


By:  /s/  James Guerin
Name:     James Guerin
Title:    Senior Vice President
Charles M. RAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3068

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,364]


SUMCO Phoenix Corporation, Sumco Southwest Corporation, a 
Subsidiary of SUMCO Corporation, Phoenix, AZ; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 24, 2009, in response to a 
worker petition filed by a State Workforce Office on behalf of workers 
at SUMCO Phoenix Corporation, SUMCO Southwest Corporation, a subsidiary 
of SUMCO Corporation, Phoenix, Arizona.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8928 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 10 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on October 29, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

Desmond D. Lee, Appellant

V.

Breckenridge Group San Antonio, II L.P., Appellee

No. 04-14-00394-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 388765

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the 

appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Catherine Stone, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, 

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on January 7, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00394-CV

Desmond D. Lee

v.

Breckenridge Group San Antonio, II L.P.

(NO. 388765 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 10 OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

FILING $195.00 INDIGENT

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF 

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of 

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and 

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Fourth District of Texas, this January 7, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2687 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2687

       To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethylisopropylamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethylisopropylamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIMETHYLISOPROPYLAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Dimethylisopropyla  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        mine (CAS No. 996-                                                 31/2015.......
                        35-0) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2921.19.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 12.1RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES     Our consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of theperiods indicated is set forth below:                       YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,   2007  2006  2005  2004  2003       (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)     FIXED CHARGES:                    Interest costs $13,696  $13,620  $6,766  $6,711  $4,692 Capitalized interest  —   —   —   260   1,558                 Total fixed charges $13,696  $13,620  $6,766   6,971   6,250                                      EARNINGS:                    Net income $11,707  $21,464  $21,913  $20,351  $5,913 Add fixed charges per above  13,696   13,620   6,766   6,971   6,250 Less capitalized interestper above  —   —   —   (260)  (1,558)                Total earnings, asadjusted $25,403  $35,084  $28,679  $27,062  $10,605                                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXEDCHARGES  1.85   2.58   4.24   3.88   1.70
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year end December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Frank R. Bauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Frank R. Bauer
-----------------------------
Frank R. Bauer
Chief Executive Officer

February 23, 2007


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Norman Becker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Norman Becker
-----------------------------
Norman Becker
Chief Financial Officer

February 23, 2007
Exhibit
32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Valley Commerce Bancorp (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Donald A. Gilles, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April
      7, 2008/s/
      Donald A. GillesDonald
      A. Gilles
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RYAN RANDALL RAMEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:09-cr-00162-RWT-1; 8:11-cv-00293-RWT)

Submitted: December 14, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan Randall Ramey, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Randall Ramey seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Ramey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Patrick E.
Delaney, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




November
      23, 2009
              /s/ Patrick E. DelaneyPatrick
      E. DelaneyChief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer





A signed
original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to
HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. and will be retained by HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Andrew DURANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3726 4D16-3875

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12-195V

(E-Filed: October 3, 2014)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MICHAEL PEREYRA, as Guardian * UNPUBLISHED

Ad Litem, for minor son, M.S.P., Jr., *

* Special Master

Petitioners, * Hamilton-Fieldman

*

v. * Decision on Attorneys’ Fees 

* and Costs; Reasonable Amount 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Requested to Which Respondent 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Does Not Object.

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Neal J. Fialkow, Neal Fialkow, Esq., Pasadena, CA, for Petitioners.

Ann D. Martin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION1(ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2Petitioner, 

Michael Pereyra, filed a petition on behalf of his minor child, M.S.P., Jr., on March 26, 

2012. On October 3, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. 

This stipulation requests a total payment of $46,500.00, representing total attorneys’ fees 

 

1

The undersigned intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States 

Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 

Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 

3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within 

which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party (1) that is trade 

secret or commercial or financial information and is privileged or confidential, or (2) that 

are medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Otherwise, “the entire” decision will be available to 

the public. Id.

2

The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa-10 et seq. (2006). 
2

and costs. Pursuant to General Order #9, Petitioner stated that he has incurred no costs in 

pursuit of his claim. 

The undersigned finds that this petition was brought in good faith and that there 

existed a reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is 

appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed 

amount seems reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby 

awards the amount of $46,500.00, in the form of a check made payable jointly to 

Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Neal J. Fialkow, Esq. 

In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of 

the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment 

in accordance herewith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman

Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman

Special Master
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02961
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.