alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Robert CYWES, Former Husband, Appellant, v. Irene WOLFE, Former Wife, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2031

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (678)
<INVENTORY>                                     33,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,341
<PP&E>                                          78,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,566
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,400
<SALES>                                         79,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,834
<CGS>                                           54,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   241
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,983
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,097
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly report of Analytical Surveys, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W.
Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.








/s/ MichaelW.Johnson


Michael
W. Johnson


Chief
Financial Officer


May 15,
2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10QSB,
FOR JUNE 30, 1997. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1 
        
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                       1,378,899 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,065 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,284 
<INVENTORY>                                    394,670 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,947,597 
<PP&E>                                         340,199 
<DEPRECIATION>                                 201,267 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,095,827 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,735 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                         4,954 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,980,138 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,095,827 
<SALES>                                        546,894 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               600,811 
<CGS>                                          239,504 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,288 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               106,575 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,389 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,693 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,696 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,696 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .004 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .004 
         

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21     Information relating to certain of the subsidiaries and affiliated trusts of TD Banknorth Inc.as of March 10, 2006 is set forth below. All of the equity interests in the indicated subsidiariesand the common securities in the affiliated trusts are directly or indirectly wholly-owned by TDBanknorth Inc., except as indicated below.Direct Subsidiaries:   Name Jurisdiction of IncorporationTD Banknorth, NA United StatesNorthgroup Captive Insurance, Inc. VermontPeoples Heritage Capital Trust I DelawareBanknorth Capital Trust I DelawareBanknorth Capital Trust II DelawareIpswich Statutory Trust I ConnecticutCCBT Statutory Trust I ConnecticutBFD Preferred Capital Trust I New YorkBFD Preferred Capital Trust II DelawareHUBCO Capital Trust I (1) DelawareHUBCO Capital Trust II (1) DelawareHudson United Capital Trust I (1) DelawareHudson United Capital Trust II (1) DelawareHudson United Statutory Trust I (1) ConnecticutIndirect Subsidiaries:   Name Jurisdiction of IncorporationBancnorth Investment Planning Group, Inc. (2)(3) MaineTD Banknorth Leasing Corporation (2) MaineTD Banknorth Insurance Group (2)(4) MaineNorthgroup Asset Management Company (2)(5) MaineFlatiron Credit Company, Inc. (1) DelawareUnited Cogen Fuel, LLC(1) DelawareUnited Gas Co., LLC(1) New JerseyUC Investments, Inc.(1) New Jersey (1) Acquired in connection with the acquisition of Hudson United Bancorp on January 31, 2006. (2) Subsidiary of TD Banknorth, NA. (3) Holds, as a subsidiary, Banknorth Investment and Insurance Agency, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation. (4) Holds, as a subsidiary TD Banknorth Insurance Agency, Inc., a Maine corporation. (5) Owns 100% of the common securities of Northgroup Preferred Capital Corp., a Maine corporationwhich has qualified as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code. TDBanknorth, NA owns 87% of the preferred securities of Northgroup Preferred Capital Corp.
SERVED: JUNE-27, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

NV FASHION BEAUTY SUPPLY DISTRIBUTORS 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1123 

POST HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

The hearing was held June 19, 2012. Receipt of the transcript is anticipated shortly. 

WHEREFORE, the parties shall adhere to the following Post Hearing Briefing Schedule: 

1. Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") shall file its 

Post-Hearing Brief on or before July 27, 2012; 

2. Nu Fashion (hereinafter "Respondent") shall file its Post-Hearing Brief on or 

before August 20, 2012; and 

3. Complainant shall file its Rebuttal Brief, if any, on or before August 27, 2012 . 

.. 

&~1ttgw2<~~ U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment(s)- Service List 

1 
' 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Ms. Gayle Chyu 

Nu Fashion Beauty SuppJy Distributors, Respondent 

1366 Kingsland Avenue 

St. Louis, MO 63133 

W. Beavis Schock, Respondent's Counsel 

7777 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 1300 

St. Louis, MO 63105 

TEL: 314-726-2322 

FAJ<: 314-721-1698 

Gayle E. Townsend, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-264-1 

TEL: 816-329-3766 

FAJ<: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant FAJ<: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-1123 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

,, 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. · 

-2-

·-·
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2725 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2725

            To suspend temporarily the duty on thidiazuron.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on thidiazuron.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THIDIAZURON.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      N-phenyl-N'-(1,2,3- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        thiadiazol-5-yl)-                                                  31/2015.......
                        urea
                        (thidiazuron)
                        (CAS No. 51707-55-
                        2) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2934.99.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.25


                     NOVELIS INC. SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
                            2005 PERFORMANCE MEASURES


Novelis Inc. ("Novelis") maintains a short-term incentive plan, STIP,
pursuant to which it awards cash bonuses to the participants. The annual
performance measures and targets as well as target award levels for the STIP
plan are established annually by Novelis' Human Resources Committee.

Novelis' Human Resources Committee has established the following three
components for the 2005 performance awards:

     (1)  Novelis' performance as measured by its cash flow performance.

     (2)  Novelis' performance, as measured by economic value added (EVA)
          performance.

     (3)  Novelis' performance relative to environment, health and safety, or
          EHS, objectives.

Of the 2005 incentive opportunity, 50% will be comprised of the cash flow
component, 40% will be comprised of the economic value added component and the
remaining 10% will be comprised of the EHS component.
ALD-115 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 23-1183

___________

IN RE: PETER DIPIETRO,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

March 30, 2023

Before: HARDIMAN, RESTREPO, and BIBAS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: May 26, 2023)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

Pro se petitioner Peter DiPietro seeks a writ of mandamus. Because DiPietro has

not demonstrated that he is entitled to such relief, we will deny his petition.

DiPietro’s mandamus petition appears to seek this Court’s assistance with a state 

court criminal matter. He has attached a motion that he filed in that case, as well as a 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

decision denying his motion. He appears to request an “accounting” and “subrogation 

from [an] implied trust to [an] expressed trust.” See Mandamus Pet. at 1. DiPietro takes 

issue with “repudiation/dishonor” by a state court judge. Id. DiPietro has also attached 

filings from a state court eviction proceeding involving a cottage in a recreational resort 

community. DiPietro does not identify any pending federal action in his petition.

A writ of mandamus is a “drastic remedy” that may be granted “only in 

extraordinary circumstances in response to an act amounting to a judicial usurpation of 

power.” In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005) (citation 

omitted). Although DiPietro’s requests are difficult to decipher, to the extent that he 

seeks this Court’s intervention in a pending or completed state court action, we lack 

authority to grant such relief. See In re Richards, 213 F.3d 773, 781 (3d Cir. 2000) (“[I]n 

the ordinary course of events, federal courts (except for the Supreme Court) lack 

appellate jurisdiction over their state counterparts, thus making writs of mandamus 

generally inappropriate.”); White v. Ward, 145 F.3d 1139, 1140 (10th Cir. 1998) (per 

curiam) (explaining that a federal court “lack[s] jurisdiction to direct a state court to 

perform its duty”). We also generally do not interfere with state criminal prosecutions. 

See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 45 (1971). Accordingly, because DiPietro has not 

shown a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief, and that no other means exist to 

attain the relief he desires, we will deny his petition. See Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 

U.S. 183, 190 (2010) (per curiam).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0577

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RUSSELL KORTAN,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the opening brief of Russell Kortan, 

electronically filed on February 18, 2022, this Court has determined that the brief does not 

comply with the below-referenced Rules and must be resubmitted.

M. R. App. P. 12(1) requires the brief contain certain sections under appropriate 

headings and in the order indicated in Rule 12. Specifically, M. R. App. P. (12)(1)(c) 

requires a statement of the case that shall briefly indicate the nature of the case and its 

procedural disposition below while M. R. App. P. 12(1)(d) separately requires a statement 

of facts relevant to the issues presented for review. The sections of Appellant’s brief do 

not meet the requirements of M. R. App. P. 12(1).

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(f) requires a summary of the argument before the argument 

portion of the brief. The summary of the argument should include a heading identifying it 

as a separate section. The summary should be a clear and concise statement of the 

arguments made in the body of the brief. Appellant’s brief does not include a summary of 

the argument.

M. R. App. P. 12(1)(i) requires an appendix to include its own table of contents. 

The appendix of Appellant’s brief does not contain its own table of contents.

02/18/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0577
2

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the 

Appellant shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court this brief containing the 

revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rules and that Appellant shall serve 

copies of the revised brief on all parties of record;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than 

those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to Appellant and to all 

parties of record. 

Electronically signed by:

Dirk Sandefur

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 18 2022
STATE of Louisiana v. Duane PARKER

NO. 2018-KH-0483

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, William H. Seippel, Chief Financial Officer of AirGate PCS, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to AirGate PCS, Inc. and will be retained by AirGate PCS, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: December 15, 2003/s/ WILLIAM H. SEIPPELWilliam H. Seippel
Chief Financial Officer
Antonio WIMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2177

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kelly Dodge President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of Victory Eagle Resources Corp., hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-K of Victory Eagle
      Resources Corp. for the year ended July 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Victory Eagle Resources Corp.                                                              



Dated: November 15, 2010



| | /s/
      Kelly Dodge                                                                                                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Kelly Dodge                                                                                                                                                        
| | President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
      Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer
      and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
Sherman Lee BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3533 4D16-3579

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 1, 2010

Before

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

Nos. 07

‐ 2272, 07

‐ 3893, 07

‐ 3940,

07

‐ 4010 & 08

‐ 3265

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeals from the United States

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee , District Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

v. No. 1:04

‐ cr

‐ 495

TROY MARTIN, EDDIE BELL, Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, Judge

. JOHN BRAYBOY, MARIO TAYLOR

and JEROME TERRELL,

Defendants

‐ Appellants

.

O R D E R

The motion of defendant Patrick Bray to amend the opinion of the court is granted.

The last sentence of footnote 27, found on page 56 of the court’s opinion is deleted.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 14, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00635

- CV

Frank GARZA

, Appellant

v.

Kris Angel FINN

, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CV04020

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an appeal in an eviction matter. Appellee has filed a “Motion to Strike the Appeal

for Jurisdiction a nd Nonpayment of Rent or in the Alternative to Allow the Writ of Possession to

Issue.” After review, we DENY appellee’s motion.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of October, 20 16

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, Pub. L. 111-8) (“the Act”), and Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of section 7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of Egypt, and I hereby waive such restriction.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published in the                     **Federal Register.**

Dated: April 2, 2009.

James B. Steinberg,

Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-9039 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-31-P