alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2


                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Securities, Series 2004-14 (the "Trust"), certify that:

         1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of
              the Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in
              respect of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports
              filed in respect of the Trust during the 2004 calendar year;

         2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
              as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
              fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
              statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
              statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
              period covered by this annual report;

         3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to
              be provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the
              trust agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in
              these reports;

         4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
              Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge,
              except as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has
              fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
              the Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar
              standards based upon the report provided by an independent
              public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with
              the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
              similar procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement, that is
              included in these reports.

Date: March 28, 2005

By: /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
     ------------------------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** D ecember 17, 2014 N o. 04
- 14
- 00696
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF E.P.C., ET AL., CHILDREN , From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013
- PA
- 02387 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding ORDER Appellant’s court
- appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of her right to file her own brief and provided appellant with a f orm motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State , No. PD
- 07
- 02
- 13, 2014 WL 2865901, at *3 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014); Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also In re R.R., No. 04
- 03
- 00096
- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). The State has filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless the appellant files a pro se brief. If the appellant desires to request the appellate record, she must file the motion requesting the record within ten days from the date of this order. If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, she must do so within twenty days from the date of this order. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

___________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of December, 2014 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
SCWC-17-0000564 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. WILLIAM E. BARRIOS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000564; 2PC101000589) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Rec ktenwald, C.J., Na kayama, McKenna, P ollack, a nd Wilson , JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant William E. Barrios’ application for writ of certiorari, filed on July 14, 2019, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 20, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000564 20-AUG-2019 08:51 AM
# z

j ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 24-0446

KYLA HARPER AND SHAWN HORTON,

Co-Petitioners,

v. ORDER MONTANA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, MISSOULA COUNTY, HON. ROBERT L. DESCHAMPS III, PRESIDING JUDGE,

Respondent.

Petitioners Kyla Harper and Shawn Horton, via counsel, petitioned this Court for a writ of supervisory control in which they asked this Court to direct the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, to issue a written order memorializing its oral rulingthat deniedtheirMotion for Partial Stay ofJudgment PendingAppeal inthat court's CauseNo. DN-23-96. Harperand Horton argued thatthey had urgent need ofawritten order denying their motion so they could request relief from that denial in this Court pursuant to M. R.App. P. 22(2). This Court has received notice that the District Court has since issued its written order denying Harper and Horton's Motion for Partial Stay ofJudgment Pending Appeal. As such, there is no basis for this Court to further consider this petition. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for writ ofsupervisory control is DENIED and DISMISSED as MOOT. The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to all parties of record in the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, Cause No. DN-23-96, and the Honorable Robert L. Deschamps III,presiding.

"c:N-- DATED this 1, 1., day ofAugust, 2024. 

# FILED AUG 1 32024 f3owen Greenw000 Clerk of Supremo° Coun Stern of Montana 08/13/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0446

# b-2- i'-e(ei tO;iAlJ.,..1.4..._
Exhibit 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, James D. Brown, the Chief Financial Officer of NutriSystem, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Companys Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: November 2, 2004 |  | /S/ JAMES D. BROWN                   
|                        |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2733 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on aqueous emulsion of a modified aliphatic amine mixture of: decanedioic acid, compounds with 1,3- 

benzene-dimethanamine-bisphenol A-bisphenol A diglycidyl etherdiethylenetriamine glycidyl phenyl ether reaction productepichlorohydrinformaldehyde- propylene oxide- triethylenetetramine polymer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on aqueous 

emulsion of a modified aliphatic amine mixture of: 

decanedioic acid, compounds with 1,3- benzenedimethanamine-bisphenol A-bisphenol A diglycidyl etherdiethylenetriamine glycidyl phenyl ether reaction productepichlorohydrinformaldehyde- propylene oxidetriethylenetetramine polymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2733 IS

1 SECTION 1. AQUEOUS EMULSION OF A MODIFIED ALI2 PHATIC AMINE MIXTURE OF: DECANEDIOIC 

3 ACID, COMPOUNDS WITH 1,3- BENZENE4 DIMETHANAMINE-BISPHENOL A-BISPHENOL 

5 A DIGLYCIDYL ETHER-DIETHYLENETRIAMINE 

6 GLYCIDYL PHENYL ETHER REACTION 

7 PRODUCT8 EPICHLOROHYDRINFORMALDEHYDE- PRO9 PYLENE OXIDE- TRIETHYLENETETRAMINE 

10 POLYMER. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.02 of the Har12 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

13 aqueous emulsion of a modified aliphatic amine mixture 

14 of: decanedioic acid, compounds with 1,3- benzene15 dimethanamine-bisphenol A-bisphenol A diglycidyl ether16 diethylenetriamine glycidyl phenyl ether reaction product17 epichlorohydrinformaldehyde- propylene oxide18 triethylenetetramine polymer) is amended by striking the 

19 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

20 2015’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

23 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

24 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2444 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain ceramic frit rings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain ceramic frit rings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CERAMIC FRIT RINGS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ceramic frit rings or powder 

composed of dysprosium 

oxide, dysprosium 

monosilicate, and mullite for 

sealing discharge lamp arc 

tubes (CAS Nos. 12161–58– 

9, 235–295–7, 1302–93–8, 

215–113–2, 1308–87–8, and 

215–164–0) (provided for in 

subheading 3207.40.5000) .... 6.5% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2444 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|Exhibit
  32.2
|--------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Xiaoling Chen, Chief Accounting Officer Secretary of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Xiaoling
      ChenXiaoling ChenChief Accounting
      Officer and SecretaryApril 16, 2007
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
---

Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION








In connection with the Annual Report of PDC 2004-D Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








/s/ Richard W. McCullough

March 15, 2010Richard W. McCulloughChief Executive OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

March 15, 2010Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION TO BE
PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K

Re:	Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-HE7 (the "Trust"), Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE7, issued pursuant to the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2004 (the "Pooling and
Servicing Agreement"), among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as
depositor, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, as a servicer, ("Chase"),
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as a servicer ("Countrywide"),
New Century Mortgage Corporation, as a servicer ("New Century"), HomEq
Servicing Corporation, as a servicer ("HomEq" and, together with Chase,
Countrywide and New Century, the "Servicers"), Aames Capital Corporation,
as a responsible party, MILA, Inc., as a responsible party, NC Capital
Corporation, as a responsible party and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
 as trustee (the "Trustee")

 I, [identify the certifying individual], certify that:

            (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the
"Annual Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution
reports (collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report,
of the Trust;

            (2) Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
the last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

            (3) Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
information required to be provided to the Trustee by each Servicer under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is included in
the Reports;

            (4) Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance
statement included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the
Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
 and except as disclosed in the Reports, each Servicer has fulfilled its
 obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

            (5) The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
the applicable Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, that is included in the Reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  the Trustee and the
Servicers.

Date:	________________________________

[Signature]
[Title]
Order filed October 2, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00691-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF L.N.C & K.N.M., CHILDREN, Appellant

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-03776J

ORDER

On September 19, 2018, this court ordered appointed counsel, William 

Thursland, to file a brief on or before September 28, 2018. No brief was filed. 

Accordingly, we issue the following order.

We ORDER the judge of the 314th District Court to immediately conduct a 

hearing to determine:

(1) the reason for the failure to file a brief; 

(2) whether appellant desires to continue this appeal; and 

(3) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, a date certain when 

appellant’s brief will be filed. 
The judge shall:

(1) appoint new appellate counsel for appellant if necessary;

(2) see that a record of the hearing is made;

(3) make findings of fact and conclusions of law; and 

(4) order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and 

conclusions. 

The transcribed record of the hearing, and supplemental clerk’s record shall 

be filed with the clerk of this court on or before October 12, 2018.

If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court 

shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date. If counsel files a brief 

before the date set for a hearing, the trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM
# C_2022084EN.01001501.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Massa — Italy) — GN, WX v Prefettura di Massa Carrara — Ufficio Territoriale del Governo di Massa Carrara

(Case C-274/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Road traffic - Registration and taxation of motor vehicles - Driver residing in a Member State - Vehicle registered in another Member State - Vehicle provided free of charge for a short period - National legislation prohibiting persons who have resided in Italy for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a vehicle registered in another country)

(2022/C 84/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Massa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: GN, WX

Defendant: Prefettura di Massa Carrara — Ufficio Territoriale del Governo di Massa Carrara

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63(1) TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which prohibits any person who has established his or her residence in that Member State for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a motor vehicle registered in another Member State, irrespective of the person in whose name that vehicle is registered, without any account being taken of the duration of the use of that vehicle in the first Member State and without the person concerned being able to invoke any right to exemption where that same vehicle is neither intended to be used essentially in the first Member State on a permanent basis nor is, in fact, used in that manner.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cardero Resource Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Henk Van Alphen, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/Henk Van Alphen

Henk Van Alphen
  President and Chief Executive Officer



Date:  April 29, 2005
Exhibit 4.33






Exhibit 4.33






HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP.


2010 Equity Compensation Plan


Approved by the shareholders of Helix BioPharma Corp. on December 9, 2010


and


Implemented by the Directors of Helix BioPharma Corp. on December 9, 2010


Amendment No. 1


June 29, 2011















HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 
2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 1


WHEREAS:




		
	

   A.
	

   Helix BioPharma Corp. (the “Company”) has adopted an equity compensation plan entitled the “2010 Equity Compensation Plan” (the “Plan”);

	

   
	

    

	

   B.
	

   The Plan was approved by shareholders and implemented by the directors of the Company on December 9, 2010;

	

   
	

    

	

   C.
	

   The Company wishes to amend section 9.4 of the Plan pursuant to the amending authority provided in section 10.1(a) of the Plan;





NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to section 10.1 (a) of the Plan:




		
	

   1.
	

   Section 9.4(b) of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the words “a Grantee” and to substitute therefor the words “an insider Grantee”.

	

   
	

    

	

   2.
	

   The amended section 9.4(b) of the Plan shall read as follows:





 




			
		9.4	Blackout Period




(b) In the event that the particular date used to determine the Fair Market Value of a Share for the purposes of calculating the number of Shares, the Appreciation Amount or the Option Appreciation Amount, as the case may be, an insider Grantee is entitled to receive under the terms of an Award Agreement falls during a Blackout Period, then that particular date used to calculate the number of Shares, the Appreciation Amount or the Option Appreciation Amount, as the case may be, will be the first business day after the Blackout Period ends.




		
	

   3.
	

   For the sake of clarity, all other terms of the original 2010 Equity Compensation Plan remain unchanged.





Dated June 29, 2011


HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP.


Per:


/s/ Gordon Lickrish

  Authorized Signatory