alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000753557
<NAME>                        LBO Capital Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                             85
<SECURITIES>                                   43,139
<RECEIVABLES>                                 308,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              351,443
<PP&E>                                          8,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                  8,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                351,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         995,155
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,210
<OTHER-SE>                                   (644,922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  351,443
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                8,219
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             46,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,731)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)



</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 15.3

CONSENT

The undersigned hereby consents to the use of its name and
references to, and the use of information derived from, the technical report
dated January 14, 2013, effective January 14, 2013, entitled Mineral Resource
Estimate for the Sheini Hills Iron Project, Ghana in the annual report on Form
20-F of Cardero Resource Corp. (the Company) being filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission and which is being incorporated by
reference into the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-151385) of the
Company.

DATED February 28, 2013

SRK Consulting (UK) Limited

Per: /s/ Howard
BakerName: Howard Baker Title: Principal Geologist

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0428

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ASIA CARL SOAPES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 26, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 19 2024

03/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0428
Exhibit 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Medizone International, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Steve M. Hanni Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer  Date: August 13, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 1, 2010

Before

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

Nos. 07‐2272, 07‐3893, 07‐3940,

07‐4010 & 08‐3265

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeals from the United States

Plaintiff‐Appellee, District Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

v. No. 1:04‐cr‐495

TROY MARTIN, EDDIE BELL, Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, Judge.

JOHN BRAYBOY, MARIO TAYLOR

and JEROME TERRELL,

Defendants‐Appellants.

O R D E R

The motion of defendant Patrick Bray to amend the opinion of the court is granted.

The last sentence of footnote 27, found on page 56 of the court’s opinion is deleted.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-13901

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00008-CEH-TBS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

MARIO TORRES-CAMPOS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(September 19, 2013)

Before MARCUS, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 12-13901 Date Filed: 09/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Joseph Michael McGuinness, appointed counsel for Mario Torres-Campos 

in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation 

of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 

S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Torres-Campos’s 

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-13901 Date Filed: 09/19/2013 Page: 2 of 2
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03502

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Frank R. Schmidt, P.E.· Manville Sales corporation P.O. Box 5108 Denver, CQ 80217-5108 Dear Mr. Schmidt: 

### 'Af'R06

### 1909'

IN REPLY REFER TO: A-3-1 NSR 4-4--:-4 SAC 77-07

This letter contains our response to your December 7, 1988 request for a modificationto the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit (NSR 4-4-4; SAC 77-07) issued to Manville Sales Corporation onOctober 3, 1978, for the construction of a fiber glass plant located inWillows, California. Arequest for public comment regarding EPA's proposed action on the above request has been published. Only one minor administrative error was commented on (please note the revised emission limit on the Cooling operation (source #9) of Line 132). After consideration of all interestedpersons (including State and local agencies), and pertinent Federal statutes and regula-. tions, the EPA hereby issues the enclosed amendments to the Approval to construct/Modify a Stationary Source for the facilities described above. This action does not constitute a significant change from the proposed action set forth and offered for public comment. This action shall be effective immediately

.

. .Should you have anyquestions regarding this matter, please· contact Peter Fickenscher of ourNew Source section at (415) • 974-8226

.
...

Enclosure
cc: Ray Menebroker, CARB Ed Romano, Glenn countyAPCD SYMBOL SURNAME DATE U.S. EPA Sincerely,

David P. Howekamp Director Air and Toxics Division 

# -------'**~~--1** 

## I I

## "+1-J--~- ' 

## I I OFFICIAL FILE COPY

# - ( (

ADDENDUM PERMIT CONDITIONS MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION (NSR 4-4-4, SAC 77-07)
The October 3, 1978, Authority to Construct (as amended·onNovember 16, 1979)

.is hereby amended

.. The first part of Special ConditionVIII.A.2. is amended to read as follows: A. Performance Tests 2. The performance tests shall be conducted for the operations designatedbelow: Line 132: Line 133: Collection and curing operations; Collection and curing operations. Special ConditionVIII.B. is amended to read as follows: B.

L!NE 

### ·"' Emission Limits for ParticulateMatter On and after the date of startup of the equipment.for which the performance tests required to be conducted by Special ConditionA above is initiated, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation shall not discharge or cause the discharge into the atmosphere from the subject equipment any gases which containparticulate matter in excess of the amounts indicatedbelow for the following sources: 132 (HERM} Maximum Source**No~** ·operation lbs/hr 1 Melter 1.25 2-7 Collection 3.79 (per unit)

8 Curing 5.00 9 Cooling 0.76 10-12 Mixed BatchDay Bin 0.20 (j:»er·unit) 13 Storage Bin 0.20 14 Blender 0.20. 15 Receiver 0.20 16-17 Wool Blowing 0.10 (per unit) 18,38-40 Cullet 0.01 (per unit)

# '

...



### LINE 133 

### {HERM} Maximum source No. QgeratiQn lbsLhr 19-26 Silos 0.20* 27 Melter 1.25 28-30 Collection 7.58 (per unit) 31 curing 5.00 32 cooling 0.76 33-35 Mixed BatchDayBin 0.20 (per unit)

36 Storage Bin 0.20 37 Blender/Receiver 0.40 

## * Only one silo is permitted to operate at·any one time.

All other permit conditions remainunchanged and in effect.**~n..~.~. ~** 

·.·...
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

THADDEUS GOSNELL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3163

[ January 23, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Colbath , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2009

- CF

- 007892

- AXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appel lant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

L EVINE , C.J., W ARNER and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## NO. 12

- 11

- 00 070

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BILLY G. COLVIN

, § APPEAL FROM THE 87TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

T.D.C.J.

– C.I.D. , APPELLEE § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a). The trial court’s judgment was signed on January 10, 2011. Under

rule of a ppellate procedure 26.1, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due to have been filed no later than February 9, 2011. Appellant’s notice of appea l was not filed until February 18, 2011. Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed on or before February 9, 2011, it was untimely. On March 4, 2011, this court notified Appellant pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure 37.1 and 42.3 tha t his notice of appeal was untimely. Appellant was further informed that the notice of appeal was filed before the deadline for a motion to extend time for filing the notice of appeal as provided in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3. Therefore, our notice continued, a motion to extend the time for filing would be implied in accordance with Verburgt

v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 615 (Tex. 1997). Appellant was notified, however, that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he notif ied the court in writing, on or before March 14, 2011, of facts that reasonably explain his need for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See id

. The deadline for responding to this court’s notice has expired, and2

Appellant has not responde d to the March 4, 2011 notice. Consequently, this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal. See id

. Because this court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26. 3, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(a). Opinion delivered March 16 , 20 1 1

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No s . 1D 17

- 4307 1D 17

- 4308

_____________________________
W ILMARIO T RUEBLOOD , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Martin A. Fitzpatrick , Judge

. June 20, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , O STERHAUS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8 ,

2018
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00827- CR

STACY MERSADEZ SILVA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 8

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2133361

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Stacy Mersadez Silva, through her appointed counsel, has filed a written motion to withdraw her notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. The motion is signed by both appellant and counsel. Because this court has not delivered an opinion, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Donovan, and Wise Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2892 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2892

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on capers, prepared or 
 preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, in immediate containers holding 
                           more than 3.4 kg.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on capers, prepared or 
 preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, in immediate containers holding 
                           more than 3.4 kg.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPERS, PREPARED OR PRESERVED BY VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID, IN 
              IMMEDIATE CONTAINERS HOLDING MORE THAN 3.4 KG.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.28 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to capers, prepared or 
preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, in immediate containers holding 
more than 3.4 kg) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

Information procedure — Technical rules

(2006/C 157/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services. (OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37; OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18).

Notifications of draft national technical rules received by the Commission

The Commission draws attention to the judgement delivered on 30 April 1996 in the ‘CIA Security’ case (C-194/94 — ECR I, p. 2201), in which the Court of Justice ruled that Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 98/34/EC (formerly 83/189/EEC) are to be interpreted as meaning that individuals may rely on them before national courts which must decline to apply a national technical regulation which has not been notified in accordance with the Directive.

This judgement confirms the Commission's communication of 1 October 1986 (OJ C 245, 1.10.1986, p. 4).

Accordingly, breach of the obligation to notify renders the technical regulations concerned inapplicable, and consequently unenforceable against individuals.

For more information on the notification procedure, please write to:

Also consult the website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/

If you require any further information on these notifications, please contact the national departments listed below:

LIST OF NATIONAL DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTIVE 98/34/EC

BELGIUM

CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

GERMANY

ESTONIA

GREECE

SPAIN

FRANCE

IRELAND

ITALY

CYPRUS

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

LUXEMBURG

HUNGARY

MALTA

NETHERLANDS

AUSTRIA

POLAND

PORTUGAL

SLOVENIA

SLOVAKIA

FINLAND

SWEDEN

UNITED KINGDOM

EFTA — ESA

TURKEY

----

(1)  Year — registration number — Member State of origin.

(2)  Period during which the draft may not be adopted.

(3)  No standstill period since the Commission accepts the grounds of urgent adoption invoked by the notifying Member State.

(4)  No standstill period since the measure concerns technical specifications or other requirements or rules on services linked to fiscal or financial measures, pursuant to the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC.

(5)  Information procedure closed.

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2696 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on piperazine co-polymerized 

copolyamide resin high-temperature melt adhesive pellets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on piperazine 

co-polymerized copolyamide resin high-temperature melt 

adhesive pellets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIPERAZINE CO-POLYMERIZED COPOLYAMIDE 

4 RESIN HIGH-TEMPERATURE MELT ADHESIVE 

5 PELLETS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.63 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 piperazine co-polymerized copolyamide resin high-tem9 perature melt adhesive pellets) is amended by striking the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2696 IS

1 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

2 2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2956 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2956

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plastic children's wallets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plastic children's wallets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC CHILDREN'S WALLETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Children's wallets  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        with outer                                                         31/2015.......
                        surface of
                        sheeting of
                        reinforced or
                        laminated
                        plastics, valued
                        not over $1.00
                        each, the
                        foregoing with
                        dimensions not
                        exceeding 26 cm
                        by 11.5 cm and
                        with artwork or
                        graphics using
                        cartoon
                        characters or
                        other children's
                        motifs (provided
                        for in subheading
                        4202.32.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### Carlsbad Energy Center Project - Carlsbad, Ca. Kerry Siekmann t o : Shaheerah Kelly 09/03/2009 12:58 PM

From: Kerry Siekmann <siekmann1@att.net> To: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA