alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Form 8-K, OMB Control No. 3235-0060, SEC File No. 270-50.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget a request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form 8-K (17 CFR 249.308) is filed by issuers to satisfy their 
current reporting obligations pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m and 78o(d)) in 
connection with the occurrence of significant corporate events. The 
purpose of Form 8-K is to provide investors with prompt disclosure of 
material information so that investors will be able to make investment 
and voting decisions better informed and receive information timely. 
Form 8-K takes approximately 5 hours per response and is filed by 
approximately 13,200 issuers approximately 8.21 annually for a total of 
108,424 responses annually. We estimate 75% of the 5 hours per response 
(3.75 hours) is prepared by the issuer for a total annual reporting 
burden of 406,590 hours (3.75 hours per response x 108,424 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e0d363f392b382a3f011f36333b3a1e31333c703b312e70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f1a299909684978590aeb0999c9495b19e9c93df949e81df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, 
Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#26767467796b474f4a44495e6655434508414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="69393b2836240800050b0611291a0c0a470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: April 10, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8879 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F R AN C I S C O S AN T AN A- QU I NT E R O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74678 A ge nc yN o. A 039- 717- 782 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F ran ci sco S an t an a-Q u i n t ero , a n at i v e an dci t i zen o f M ex i co , p et i t i o n s p ro se f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n an dr e c o n s id e ro n th e b a s is o f in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of 

# FI LED

MA Y25 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 74678 2 di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of

am ot i on t o r e c ons i de ra nd r e ope n, a nd r e vi e w de novo due p r o c e s s c la im s . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p a rt th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng S ant ana - Q ui nt e r o’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n and r e c ons i de rbe c aus e S ant ana - Q ui nt e r o f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha tthe a l l e ge d i ne f

f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

hi s f orm e ra tt orne y s m ayha ve a f f e c t e d the o u tc o m e o f

h is p r o c e e d in g s . See i d. a t793- 94 ( t o pr e va i l on a n i ne f f e c t i ve a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l c la im , ap e titio n e rm u s t d e m o n s tr a te p r e ju d ic e ) ; Mi elew cz

yk v. H older , 575 F . 3d 992, 995- 98 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( ac onvi c t i on f orvi ol a t i ng C al i forni a H ea l th & S af ety C od e § 11 35 2 con st i tut es a r em ov abl e c on trol l ed sub st an ce o ffen se w h ere th e reco rdo f co n v i ct i o n est ab l i sh es th atth e o ffen se in v o lv e dc o c a in e ) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w S ant ana - Q ui nt e r o’ s c ont e nt i on tha the qu al i fi es for r el i ef

un der f orm erse ct i on 21 2(c) , 8 U . S . C . § 1 18 2(c) (r epea l ed 1996) , be c aus e he f

a i l e d t o e xhaus tthi s c l a i m i n hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n a nd re consi der. Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2776 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2776

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of thiophanate 
                   methyl and application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of thiophanate 
                   methyl and application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF THIOPHANATE METHYL AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.79 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of thiophanate 
methyl and application adjuvants) is amended by striking the date in 
the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Irving FLORES, DOC #C04283, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1220

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 9, 2018

Irving Flores, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Irving Flores appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief.1 *See* *232Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. In the first ground of his motion, Mr. Flores sufficiently alleged that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness at trial. *See* *Barthel v. State*, 882 So.2d 1054, 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Because the record relied upon by the postconviction court did not conclusively refute Mr. Flores' claim, *see* *Jones v. State*, 71 So.3d 193, 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; *Yarbrough v. State*, 871 So.2d 1026, 1031 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), we reverse the summary denial of the first ground and remand for an evidentiary hearing, *see* *Nolan v. State*, 794 So.2d 639, 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We affirm the order in all other respects.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Mr. Flores raised nine grounds in his motion for postconviction relief. The postconviction court denied the second and fourth grounds after an evidentiary hearing, and summarily denied the remaining grounds. On appeal, Mr. Flores only challenges the postconviction court's summary denial of the first and eighth grounds.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000753601
<NAME> OIS OPTICAL IMAGING
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         612,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,355,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,318,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,338,894
<PP&E>                                      54,822,052
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,447,328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,713,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,331,220
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       967,221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        187
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,815,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,713,618
<SALES>                                      2,141,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,141,893
<CGS>                                        5,345,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,014,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               235,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             288,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,107,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,107,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,107,595)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.7**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Exeter Resource Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cecil Bond, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act        of 2002, that:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | March 31, 2010 | /s/ Cecil Bond |
|--------|----------------|----------------|

|   | Cecil Bond |
|--------|------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Exeter Resource Corporation and will be retained by Exeter Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-59 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName: Nancy H. ForteTitle: Assistant Vice PresidentDate:
    
    March 29, 2005
Ariana Joyce BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2172

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21.1
 List of Subsidiaries of Novelis Inc.
 Name of Entity
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationNovelis Corporation
    
    Texas, United StatesNovelis de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoNovelis Brand LLC
    
    Delaware, United StatesNovelis PAE Corporation
    
    Delaware, United StatesEvermore Recycling LLC
    
    Delaware, United StatesLogan Aluminum Inc.
    
    Delaware, United StatesNovelis South America Holdings LLC
    
    Delaware, United StatesAluminum Upstream Holdings LLC
    
    Delaware, United StatesMiniMRF LLC
    
    Delaware, United StatesEurofoil Inc. (USA)
    
    New York, United StatesNovelis AG
    
    SwitzerlandNovelis Switzerland S.A.
    
    SwitzerlandNovelis Technology AG
    
    SwitzerlandNovelis Italia SpA
    
    ItalyNovelis Europe Holdings Limited
    
    United KingdomNovelis UK Ltd.
    
    United KingdomNovelis Services Limited
    
    United KingdomNovelis Aluminium Holding Company
    
    IrelandNovelis Benelux NV
    
    BelgiumNovelis Belgique S.A.
    
    BelgiumNovelis Deutschland GmbH
    
    GermanyAluminium Norf GmbH
    
    GermanyNovelis Aluminium Beteiligungs GmbH
    
    GermanyDeutsche Aluminium Verpackung Recycling GmbH
    
    GermanyNovelis Luxembourg S.A.
    
    LuxembourgNovelis Foil France S.A.S.
    
    FranceFrance Aluminium Recyclage S.A.
    
    FranceNovelis Laminés France S.A.S.
    
    FranceNovelis PAE S.A.S.
    
    France4260848 Canada Inc.
    
    Canada4260856 Canada Inc.
    
    CanadaNovelis Cast House Technology Ltd.
    
    Ontario, CanadaNovelis No. 1 Limited Partnership
    
    Quebec, CanadaNovelis Korea Limited
    
    South KoreaAluminium Company of Malaysia Berhad
    
    MalaysiaAl Dotcom Sdn Berhad
    
    MalaysiaAlcom Nikkei Specialty Coatings Sdn Berhad
    
    MalaysiaNovelis do Brasil Ltda.
    
    BrazilConsórcio Candonga (unicoporated joint venture)
    
    BrazilAlbrasilis  Alumínio do Brasil Indústria e Comércio Ltda.
    
    BrazilNovelis (India) Infotech Ltd.
    
    IndiaNovelis Madeira, Unipessoal, Lda
    
    Portugal
 188
Paul D. SIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.4**

 

**CONSENT****OF****CARACLE CREEK INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING (PTY) LTD****.******

 

Each of the undersigned hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-132294, No. 333-147214, No. 333-164982, No. 333-173881, No. 333-179827, No. 333-186917, No. 333-193061 and 333-201793) of NextSource Materials Inc., of references to their respective names and to Caracle Creek International Consulting (Pty) Ltd.’s name, and to the use of the scientific and technical information, including any reserve or resource estimates, from the technical report titled “Molo Feasibility Study - National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on the Molo Graphite Project located near the Village of Fotadrevo in the Province of Toliara, Madagascar” dated effective July 13, 2017 (the “Technical Information”), including extracts from or summaries of the Technical Information that are contained in the annual report on Form 10-K of NextSource Materials Inc.

 

 

October 27, 2017

 

Caracle Creek International Consulting (Pty) Ltd.

 

 

| /S/ J. Hancox              |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |
| Name: J. Hancox

Title:    |   |
|                       |   |
|                       |   |
|                       |   |
| /S/ D. Subrumani           |   |
| Name: D. Subrumani

Title: |   |
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

          In connection with the Annual Report of National Health Partners, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), I, David M.
Daniels, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Alex Soufflas, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

          (1)  the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Dated: March 23, 2007                   /s/ David M. Daniels
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David M. Daniels
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 23, 2007                   /s/ Alex Soufflas
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alex Soufflas
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal L 224/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.224.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 224 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5521 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.224.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 224

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5521 August 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 of 3 August 2012 laying down implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 of 3 August 2012 laying down implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Order entered October 30, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01160-CR

PEDRO SANTIAGO MARIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-52413-Y

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was initially due on January 26, 2020. Although we 

granted a motion extending the time until March 2, 2020, no brief was filed. On 

May 18, 2020, we abated the appeal for a hearing. Eight days later, appellate 

counsel Valencia Bush filed a letter informing us that the signed jury charge on 

guilt/innocence was missing from the clerk’s record. In the interest of expediting 

the appeal, we reinstated the appeal, vacated our order to the extent it required a 

hearing, ordered the district clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record with the 
signed jury charge by June 9, 2020, and ordered appellant’s brief due thirty days 

after the supplemental clerk’s record was filed. On July 8, 2020, the supplemental 

clerk’s record was filed, making appellant’s brief due on August 7, 2020. Two 

weeks later, Ms. Bush filed another motion for an extension of time to file the brief 

which we granted. We ordered the brief due by September 25, 2020 and cautioned 

Ms. Bush that further extensions were disfavored. To date, the brief has not been 

filed, and we have had no further communication from Ms. Bush.

We ORDER Valencia Bush removed as appellant’s appointed attorney of 

record.

We ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in 

this appeal and to transmit a supplemental record containing the order appointing 

new counsel to this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to the Honorable Chika Anyiam, Presiding Judge, Criminal District 

Court No. 7; to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; to Valencia Bush; and 

to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, Appellate Division.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. 

The appeal will be reinstated fifteen days from the date of this order or when the 

order appointing new counsel is received.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE