alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, David Miles Oman, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Elite Artz, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer=s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer=s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer=s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer=s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: March 30, 2007 /s/ David Miles Oman David Miles Oman Principal Financial Officer
### U.S.Department of

Transportation Office ofthe Secretary 

### OfTransportation

Mr. Thomas C.Frungillo Director Bradford Regional Airport 212 Airport Drive Lewis Run, PA 16738 Dear Mr. Frungillo: .. ~, ,.T ,(> 

### Ii j

## I'0c ;.1 _....... , , "l' ,.j 

# D!C /j

# 20J3 '200 New Jersey Ave.,S.E. Washington,DC20590

Thank you for your letter dated September 26, 2013, regarding Silver Airways' ("Silver") service at Bradford. Inthe letter, you reiterated that the Department ofTransportation (Department), in the most recent carrier selection Order for Bradford (2012-9-23), found that Bradford's enplanements per day were fewer than 10, which could affect Bradford's future eligibility in the EASProgram. You also stated that the Department expected Bradford and Silverto work together to make sure that Bradford meets all of the criteria required to remain in the EASProgram. However, you stated Silver has not been a willing partner to take steps to increase ridership, resulting in asteady decline in traffic. Asa result, you asked the Department to terminate its contract with Silver and requested aright to awaiver to secure an airline that would work with the community to deliver adequate airservice. In response to your request to terminate their contract, we informally contacted Silver, and the carrier is not willing to relinquish its contract prematurely. Thus, the Department isnot able to terminate Silver's contract. Regarding the waiver request, the Department isnot in aposition yet to issue waivers. The waiver process isstill in development and, once finalized, will apply to all communities. Asa result, we are not entertaining waiver applications atthis time. The Department istargeting completion of this process early next year. Please note that the Department's refusal to consider waivers atthe present time will not prejudice future waiver applications once the process isset in motion. The Department appreciates Bradford's proactive approach and encourages the community to review the waiver process once it has been communicated to all parties in the coming months.
We will place acopy of this letter in Bradford's docket on www.regulations.gov. Sincerely,



# , 1/ \

. (\ tie 

# {2~J.n~
Deputy Director 'Office of Aviation Analysis
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1330/2005

of 11 August 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 5 to 11 August 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 August 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 August 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 302 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, James C. Mroczkowski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.;
 
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 13, 2003
   /s/ James C. Mroczkowski
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 James C. Mroczkowski
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2525 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2525

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Mesotrione.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Mesotrione.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MESOTRIONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.03 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Mesotrione) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
PRESENTATION FOREPA PVC MACTMeetingNovember 23, 20091Shin-Etsu Chemical - Shintech’sParent CompanyPVC Capacity and Market SummaryTechnology overviewShintech’s historyProcess discussionPVC MACT testing request2SHINTECH - wholly owned subsidiary of SHIN-ETSU Chemical Co., LTDSHIN-ETSU Group (As of March 31, 2008)1) $13.7 Billion Global Sales(JPY100 = US$1.00)2) 20,241 Employees, production bases in 16 countriesMajor Product and Market PositionsWorld WidePVC(Polyvinyl Chloride) 1Silicon Wafers1Cellulose Derivatives 1Silicones4(No.1 in Japan)Synthetic Quartz Glass 1(for photomasks)Rare Earth Magnets 1(for hard disc drives)SHIN-ETSU AND ITS GROUP3SHINTECH GLOBAL PVCTECHNOLOGY SUPPORTSHINTECHTS+QCTX & LASHIN-ETSUPVC R&D CENTERKASHIMA, JAPANC.I.R.E.S.TS + QCESTARREJA,PORTUGALSHIN-ETSU PVC EUROPETS+QCNETHERLANDSSHIN-ETSUKASHIMA, JAPANCUSTOMERSHIN-ETSUPOLYMERPILOT PLANT &PROCESS EQUIPMENT4SHIN-ETSU GROUP PVC WORLD CAPACITYSHINTECH U.S.A.•Freeport, Texas :3,200MM LBS per year(1,450K Tons)•Louisiana(before expansion):1,300MM LBS per year(590K Tons)(after expansion)2,600MM LBS per year(1,190K Tons)SHIN-ETSU JAPAN :1,210MM LBS per year(550K Tons)CIRES PORTUGAL :440MM LBS per year(200K Tons)SHIN-ETSU PVC NETHERLANDS:990MM LBS per year(450K Tons)Total PVC Production Capacity : 8,440MM LBS per year(after expansion) (approx. 4 million Tons)5CHANGE IN THE CAPACITY IN THE USA (MM LBS)2009Shintech 5,800 (35%)Oxyvinyl 3,653 (22%)Georgia Gulf 2,653 (16%)Formosa 2,524 (15%)Westlake 1,526 (9%)Certainteed 481 (3%)Dispersion/Copolymer 655 (4%)17,2926Shintech uses the state-of-the-art PVC productiontechnology developed by Shin-EtsuShin-Etsu technology- is used for about 18% of world’s PVC resin production- is adopted by 12 International Licensees worldwidePrecisionPVC resin through computer controlConsistencyfrom large reactorsQualityfrom anti-fouling reactor designISO 9001 and 14001 standards certified7SHINTECHBrief History1974 Freeport Plant start-up2000 Addis Plant start-up2008 Plaquemine Chlor-Alkali/VCM/PVC plants start upOperation OutlineCorporate office -Houston, TXPlant Location -Freeport, TX / about 800 Acres(3.1 million)- Addis, LA / about 1,200 Acres(4.8 million)- Plaquemine, LA/ about 3,100 Acres (12.6 million)Facility - 3 Independent PVC Production Plants (TX & LA)Total PVC Capacity (Jan ’07) - 5,200 Million lbs/yr (2 million MT)Employees (Apr ’07) - 45389PVC MACT Testing Plan ProposalShintech has proposed to utilize the testresults from one site as therepresentative data for all three sitesThe uniform technology used throughouteach site provides a redundancy elementThe proposed production grade is themajority of product manufacturedThe only difference among the sites isproduction scale
Exhibit 10.26
​
Letter Agreement Counter Parties
 
	

	

	

	

	


	Name
	 
	Title
	 
	Date Signed

	Heilmann, P.
	 ​
	SVP, Chief Legal Officer
	 ​
	October 23, 2014

	Lauer, J.
	​
	SVP, Ocean Services
	​
	April 6, 2015

	Cerocke, G.
	​
	Senior Vice President
	​
	February 25, 2021

	Dreyfus, B.
	​
	Senior Vice President 
	​
	February 27, 2020

	Gao, Q.
	​
	Senior Vice President
	​
	February 25, 2021

	Kinney, R.
	​
	Senior Vice President
	​
	February 27, 2020

	Park, K.
	​
	Senior Vice President
	​
	February 24, 2022

	Rascon, L.
	​
	Senior Vice President
	​
	February 25, 2021

	Scott, C.
	​
	Senior Vice President
	​
	February 25, 2021

	Sullivan, J.
	​
	Senior Vice President
	​
	February 27, 2020

	Stuck, K.
	​
	Vice President and Controller
	​
	May 11, 2018



​
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-54;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
EXHIBIT
99.8



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the inclusion in Exeter
Resource Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 of our Auditor’s Report dated
March 5, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements comprising the consolidated statements of financial position as
at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, and the consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive
income (loss), cash flows and changes in equity for each of the years of the two year period ended December 31, 2011 and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2011, which appears in this Annual Report.



|(signed) PricewaterhouseCoopers
    LLP | 
|--------------------------------------- | 
|                                        | 
|Chartered Accountants                   | 
|                                        | 
|Vancouver, Canada                       | 
|March 30, 2012                          |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000753557
<NAME>                        LBO Capital Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         43
<SECURITIES>                               40,271
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           40,314
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             40,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     658,841
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    1,210
<OTHER-SE>                               (619,737)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               40,314
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         12,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,678)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.00)
        


</TABLE>
Opinion issued December 17, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00628-CV

———————————

CECIL ADAMS, Appellant

V.

REBECCA ROSS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1084022

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Cecil Adams, filed an appeal from the trial court’s April 9, 2018 

summary judgment order and June 6, 2018 order denying his motion for new trial. 

We dismiss this appeal as moot.
2

In June 2019, it came to this Court’s attention that Adams might be deceased. 

Although an appeal may continue as if the appellant were alive, see TEX. R. APP. P.

7.1(a), the Court issued an order requesting a response concerning whether Adams 

was deceased. Appellee, Rebecca Ross, filed a response, stating that Adams had 

passed away on January 21, 2019, and that Ross was unaware of any probate filings. 

Ross also advised this Court that Adams’s former wife, Maxine Trice, had moved to 

enforce the mediated settlement agreement in a different trial court cause number, 

No. 1044023, in the County Civil Court at Law No. 3, and that the trial court had 

entered an order enforcing all terms of the agreement. Ross stated that Trice was 

paid her portion of the settlement funds on March 13, 2019, and, because Adams 

was subject to a child support lien, Ross paid Adams’s portion of the settlement 

funds to the Texas Attorney General on March 19, 2019.

The current appeal involves the same mediated settlement agreement 

adjudicated in Trice’s separate case. In this appeal, Adams had filed a breach of 

contract suit against his former wife concerning the mediated settlement agreement. 

Because it appears that the issues concerning the settlement agreement have been 

resolved in the trial court case filed by Trice, Ross contends that this appeal is moot. 

“Generally, an appeal is moot when the court’s action on the merits cannot 

affect the rights of the parties.” VE Corp. v. Ernst & Young, 860 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex. 

1993). This Court issued a notice on October 8, 2019, advising the parties that the 
3

appeal might be moot because the issues in this appeal were adjudicated in trial court 

cause number 1044023, styled Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Rebecca Ross. 

The Court requested a response within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed as 

moot. No response was filed.

Because it appears that the issues in this appeal concerning breach of the 

settlement agreement have already been decided in another trial court case and the 

settlement funds have been distributed, we conclude that the issues in this appeal are 

moot. See In re J.H.H., a Child, 546 S.W.3d 765, 766 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] 2018, no pet.).

We dismiss this appeal. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Lloyd and Kelly.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2824 

To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Blue 7. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Blue 7. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC BLUE 7. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.61 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Basic Blue 7) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Wendall HALL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. John WILLIS, Warden, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3030

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Certiorari is denied.