SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST

(in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)

d Department ofthe Environment

, 2009

0-06 Repeal of .15C(4) and Amendments to Regulation .15A and .15C under COMAR 26.11.19, Volatile

Compounds from Specific Processes.

her Cripps

15, 2010

ACCEPTABLE

REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 1(X)

al from the Governor or his designee, 1. Letter dated April 22, 2009 from Shari T. Wilson, Secretary, X

the plan or revision thereof. Maryland Department ofthe Environment to Shawn Garvin,

Regional Administrator.

s adopted the plan in the State code or 2. The State has submitted evidence that the regulations were X

d the permit, order, consent agreement adopted and approved in final form on March 21, 2010, with an

shall include the date of adoption or ffective date of April 19, 2010 (Volume 37, Issue 8 page 623 of

effective date ofthe plan, if different :he Maryland Register, April 9, 2010).

ate.

s the necessary legal authority under 3. The regulations were issued pursuant to Maryland X

ment the plan. Environment Article, §1-101, 1-404, 2-101 — 2-103, 2-301——2-

303, 10-102, and 10-103, Annotated Code of Maryland; Ch.23,

&cts of 2006.
REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

n, or document submitted for approval 1.. A copy of the proposed rule was published in the Maryland

ce into the plan, including indication of Register on December 18, 2009 (Volume 36, Issue 26, pp. 2073- X

ting approved plan, where applicable. 2074), and the final rule was published in the Maryland Register

y of the official State )fl April 9, 2010 with an effective date of April 19, 2010

stamped, dated by the appropriate State (Volume 37, Issue 8 page 623 of the Maryland Register, April 9,

ully enforceable by the State. The 2010).

onldocument shall, whenever possible,

t itself.

llowed all ofthe procedural 5. Cover letter transmitting the SIP revision dated April 22, X

aws and constitution in conducting and 2009. Copies and certification of public hearing notices.

uance of the plan.

e was given ofthe proposed change 6. Notice of public hearing and public comment period was X

pproved by EPA, including the date of ,ublished in The Washington Post and MDE’s web site on

December 17, 2009 and in The Baltimore Sun and the The

‘rederick News-Post on December 18, 2009, and copies of these

iotices were provided. A hearing transcript is provided.

earings were held in accordance with 7. Original Transcript of Public Hearing was provided in the X

the public notice and the State’s laws pril 22, 2009 submittal.

e.

mments and the State’s response thereto. 8. No public comments were received. X
uired to support the proposed revision,

data, models used, ambient monitoring

ta used, justification for use of offsite

models used, assumptions, and other

etermination of adequacy ofthe

REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL

ted pollutants affected by the plan. 1. The submittal identifies VOCs, which are precursors of 8- X

iour ozone.

ons of affected sources including the 2. State of Maryland.

ent designation ofthe locations and the X

for the affected area(s).

ges in plan allowable emissions from the 3. The plan establishes requirements to limit volatile organic X

f changes in current actual emissions compounds (VOCs) from the application of adhesives applied

ere appropriate, quantification of o “specialty electronic systems and subsystems for defense and

from affected sources through iomeland security.”

es between certain baseline levels and

ted as a result of the revision.

that the national ambient air quality 1.. This revision would add VOC control requirements for X

ificant deterioration increments, adhesives applied to “specialty electronic systems and

demonstration, and visibility, as subsystems for defense and homeland security” to the SIP.

he plan is approved and implemented. . .

lie revision would repeal section C(4) because it was replaced

)y COMAR 26.11.35 “Control of Emissions of Volatile

Organic Compounds from Adhesives and Sealants” (submitted

as revision to the Maryland SIP on April 18, 2008 and by a

revised section C(4) to address a remaining source exempted by

inder COMAR 26.1 1.35.01C2©..

5. Not applicable. No modeling demonstration was required to X

support the required revision. No additional modeling beyond

JAM attainment modeling is needed.
REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL

y, that emission limitations are based on 6. The plan establishes a daily cap (averaged monthly) on the X

on technology, emissions from VOCs emitted by the application of adhesives

applied to “specialty electronic systems and subsystems for

lefense and homeland security.”

tains emission limitations, work practice 7. The plan adds requirements to limit VOCs from the X

/reporting requirements, where application of adhesives applied to “specialty electronic

n levels, systems and subsystems for defense and homeland security”and

specifies the records to be kept and the averaging times.

strategies, including how compliance 8. The plan adds requirements to limit VOCs from specifies the X

e. ‘ecords to be keep and the averaging times.” And specifies the

‘ecords to be keep and the averaging times.

hnological justifications required by any 9. No special justifications are required. X

a policy is not appropriate, explain why.)

ust be accompanied by a maintenance 10. Not applicable because this is not a section 107 request. X

nce to the relevant NAAQS for at least