alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employee Benefits Security Administration

          - [Application Number D-11363]

                    In the May 9, 2008 issue of the                     **Federal Register**                    , at 73 FR 26415, the Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed exemption from the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and from certain taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The notice of proposed exemption concerned the proposed sale of improved real property by the Plan to a partnership to be comprised of Anthony J. Kostiuk (the Applicant and Plan Fiduciary), Anthony L. Kostiuk, Edmund Chmiel, Andre Frydl, and David Marinier, each of whom is a party in interest with respect to the Plan.                

By letter dated March 16, 2009, the Applicant requested that the application for exemption be withdrawn.

Accordingly, the notice of proposed exemption is hereby withdrawn.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of April, 2009.

Ivan L. Strasfeld,

Director, Office of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-8675 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
s 

NORFOLK AIRPORT AUTHORIPT 

Norfolk International Airport' / 2200 Norview Avenue / Norfolk, Virginia 23518-5807 -,-- - n.- • - • • 'O^nnTiTlOK' 

757-857-3351 / Fax: 757-857-3265 :--.i'i >--^^ ^^ - :o;U: > w ,, lUn 

March 9, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

I respectfully ask you to approve American Airlines' request for allocation of two 

daily U.S.-Haneda slot pairs to operate year-round scheduled air transportation from 

New York and Los Angeles to Tokyo Haneda. American's proposed service clearly 

represents the best public interest use for two of the four frequencies to be awarded in 

this proceeding, as New York and Los Angeles are far and away the largest travel 

markets between the U.S. mainland and Tokyo. 

Furthermore, American's proposed service will provide significant connecting 

opportunities, providing benefits to even more consumers. A total of 17 U.S. cities will 

enjoy on-line service beyond New York in one or both directions, and 20 beyond Los 

Angeles. All 10 of the largest U.S. mainland-Tokyo markets will gain on-line service to 

Haneda under American's proposal, including San Francisco, Chicago, Las Vegas, 

Seattle, Washington, Boston, Orlando, and Portland through roundtrip connections. 

I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve American's 

application, as it will benefit the broadest public interest and will have a positive impact 

on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options to 

choose from. 

Sincerely, 

Wayne E. Shank, A.A.E. 

Exeidutive Director 

WES/jpj
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.4.8

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                            SHIP MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

                                 April 11, 2005

            Reference is hereby made to the Ship Management Agreement, dated
October 20, 2004 (the "Ship Management Agreement"), between Consul Ltd., a
company incorporated in the Islands of Bermuda (the "Owners") and Northern
Marine Management Ltd., a company incorporated in Scotland (the "Managers").
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
to them in the Time Charter.

            The Owners and the Managers hereby agree that the provisions of the
Ship Management Agreement shall be amended as follows:

            1. The schedule set forth in Clause 21 shall be deleted and replaced
      by the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       "Period                                  Management Fee
<S>                                                             <C>
1  (Effective date stated in Box 4 - November 10, 2005)             $ 5,300
2  (November 11, 2005 - November 10, 2006)                          $ 5,565
3  (November 11, 2006 - November 10, 2007)                          $ 5,843
4  (November 11, 2007 - November 10, 2008)                          $ 6,135
5  (November 11, 2008 - November 10, 2009)                          $ 6,442
Option 1 (November 11, 2009 - November 10, 2010)                    $ 6,764
Option 2 (November 11, 2010 - November 10, 2011)                    $ 7,103
Option 3 (November 11, 2011 - November 10, 2012)                    $ 7,458"
</TABLE>

      This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of England. Except as provided herein, the Ship Management Agreement shall
remain unchanged.

      OWNERS                               MANAGERS

      Consul Ltd.                          Northern Marine Management Ltd.

      By: /s/ Arthur L. Regan              By: /s/ Mats Berglund
          -------------------                  -----------------
      Name: Arthur L. Regan                Name: Mats Berglund
      Title: President and CEO             Title: Director
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2928 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2928

            To suspend temporarily the duty on helvetolide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on helvetolide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HELVETOLIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2-(1-(3',3'-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        dimethyl-1'-                                                       31/2015.......
                        cyclohexyl)ethoxy
                        )-2-methyl propyl
                        propanoate
                        (helvetolide)
                        (CAS No. 141773-
                        73-1) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2915.50.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 6, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00638

- CV

SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING, LLC,

Appellant

v.

REGENCY FILED SERVICES, LLC, Regency Energy Partnersxs, Appellee s

From the 343rd Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M

- 14

- 0029

- CV

- C Honorable Janna K. Whatley, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk ’ s record was due on October 26, 2017

. On November 2, 2017, the trial court
clerk filed a notification of late clerk ’ s record, stating that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to file a designation of record.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a) states that the trial court clerk is responsible for preparing, certifying, and timely filing the clerk ’ s record if:

(1) a notice of appeal has been filed; and

(2) the party responsible for paying for the preparation of the clerk ’ s record has paid the clerk ’ s fee, has made satisfactory arrangements to pay the fee, or is entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 35.3(a). A ppellant has filed a notice of appeal. Further , the trial court clerk has not claimed that appellant is not entitled to proceed without paying the fee. Thus, pursuant to Rule 35.3(a), the trial court clerk is responsible for preparing, ce rtifying, and timely filing the
clerk ’ s record.

Rule 34.5(a) lists the documents to be included in the clerk ’ s record “ [u]nless the parties designate the filings in the appellate record by agreement under Rule 34.2. ” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5. In civil cases, the documents to be included are the following:(1) all pleadings on which the trial was held;

(2) the court ’ s docket sheet,

(3) the court ’ s charge and the jury ’ s verdict, or the court ’ s findings of fact and conclusions of law;

(4) the court ’ s judgment or other order that is being appealed;

(5) any request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, any post

judgment motion, and the court ’ s order on the motion;

(6) the notice of appeal;

(7) any formal bill of exception;

(8) any request for a re porter ’ s record, including any statement of points or issues under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(c);

(9) any request for preparation of the clerk ’ s record;

(10) a certified bill of costs including the cost of preparing the clerk ’ s record, showing credits for payments made; and

(11) any filing that a party designates to have included in the record.

Thus, appellant is not required to file a designation of materials to be included in the clerk ’ s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(a); 34.5(a).

We, therefore, ORDER the trial court clerk to file the clerk ’ s record on or before
November 27 , 2017

. In preparing the clerk ’ s record, the trial court clerk is ORDERED to follow Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34. 5(a).

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 6th day of November, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
# Official Journal L 172/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 172 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 633 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 172

English edition

Legislation

Volume 633 June 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/734 of 27 May 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Rheinisches Apfelkraut’ (PGI)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/735 of 2 June 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 as regards the use of meat-and-bone meal as a fuel in combustion plants (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/736 of 2 June 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the Union (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/737 of 27 May 2020 on the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to contracts awarded for activities related to the provision of certain postal services in Denmark
  (notified under document C(2020) 3335)

   (
  1
  ) | 23 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/734 of 27 May 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Rheinisches Apfelkraut’ (PGI))

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/735 of 2 June 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 as regards the use of meat-and-bone meal as a fuel in combustion plants (
  1
  )

1

3

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/736 of 2 June 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the Union (
  1
  )

1

7

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/737 of 27 May 2020 on the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to contracts awarded for activities related to the provision of certain postal services in Denmark
  (notified under document C(2020) 3335)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 3335)

1

23

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Salary Adjustments for Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10(b) 
 ALFA CORPORATION 
 SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 Set forth below are the 2008 annual salaries for the named executive officers that will be reimbursed by the Company to Mutual under a Management and Operating Agreement
between the companies: 
  

				
	 	  	2008 Salary1
	 Jerry A. Newby
	  	$	352,613
	 C. Lee Ellis
	  	$	243,990
	 Herman T. Watts
	  	$	174,685
	 Stephen G. Rutledge
	  	$	168,814
	 Thomas E. Bryant
	  	$	172,057

  

	 1
	 The 2008 salary figures assume that the percentage of salary reimbursed by the Company to Mutual will remain at the same
level as 2007. The amounts reimbursed to Mutual by the Company could change in the future.
v238785_ex10-2 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
Message Information 

Date 

From 

To


cc


Subject

07/20/2011 01:54 PM 

ray.warrickmasonteaparty.org

ray.Iahood©dot.gov ; LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

chris.Iittleton©ohiolibertycouncil.Org

Fuel Economy Standards 

Please see attached letter. Mason Tea Party Ietter.doc 

OEX Processing Information 

Processed Date: 

Processed By 

P0 Office 

Message Count
The Hon. Ray LaHood 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

ryJ!ickdot.gov 

The Hon. Lisa Jackson 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

jckson, I isa()epgçy 

Dear Secretary LaHood and Administrator Jackson, 

The decision before you to establish our country's future fuel economy standard has incredible 

significance. Your choice will affect every American given our heavy reliance on automotive 

transportation. I hope you maintain the standard at its present level and not implement 

aggressive new requirements in the 2017-25 period. 

As a former CEO and current small business consultant, I understand the fragile nature of the 

marketplace more than most. I have lived it first-hand and now try to help others reach success 

despite our economy's enormous obstacles. Small businesses face hurdles day in and out, 

making their long-term survival uncertain. I assure you, the impact of a higher fuel economy 

standard is something small businesses do not need, particularly in our present economy. 

Furthermore, I write you as the founder of the Mason Tea Party in Mason, Ohio. We are a nonpartisan organization of citizens united in a mission to secure policy policies to limit government 

and encourage fiscal responsibility. Setting the fuel economy standard may seem unrelated to 

our group's charge, but in fact it is entwined with our very existence. 

Government has a significant role to play for the betterment of our society, but government must 

be prudent in what it does and be sensible in how far it goes to implement public policy. Our 

country is facing a huge deficit, a weak economy and record levels unemployment. The fuel 

economy standard cannot be established in a vacuum without examining the correlation of these 

major factors. One thing is undeniable, negative repercussions for our country's economy will 

be the result if the standard is set too high.

Ray Warrick 

Founder, Mason Tea Party 

rnasonteapi1rtyJg
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





The
      following certification is provided by the undersigned Chairman of the Board
      of
      Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Merchants and Manufacturers
      Bancorporation, Inc. on the basis of such officer's knowledge and belief for
      the
      sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Michael J. Murry, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
      of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350.





(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o
      (d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Merchants and Manufacturers
      Bancorporation, Inc.





/s/
                Michael J. Murry





Name:
                Michael J. Murry
              Title:
                Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
                Officer
              Date:
                November 8, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-60 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:

/s/
Nancy H. ForteName:
    Nancy H. ForteTitle:
    Assistant Vice President Date: March 29, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6128

JERITON LAVAR CURRY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:22-cv-00180-MOC)

Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: August 31, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeriton Lavar Curry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6128 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeriton Lavar Curry appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his sentence by way of the savings clause 

in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Curry v. United States, No. 3:22-cv00180-MOC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2022).∗

 We deny Curry’s pending motions. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Curry filed his notice of appeal on December 12, 2022, more than 60 days after 

the district court dismissed his petition. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). However, the 

court did not enter its final order until March 27, 2023, when it denied Curry’s pending 

motion to amend. Accordingly, we conclude that Curry’s notice of appeal was timely. See 

Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(2).

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6128 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 2 of 2