alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Director Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.22 
 DOMINION HOMES, INC. 
 2007 Director Compensation Plan 
  

	1.	Director Fees (paid quarterly in advance)* 

  

	 	(a)	$40,000 annual fee for each outside director ($10,000 per quarter) 

  

	 	(b)	Additional $5,000 annual fee ($1,250 per quarter) for: 

  

	 	•	 	 each Audit Committee member (other than Audit Committee Chair) 



	 	•	 	 the Compensation Committee Chair, and 



	 	•	 	 the Governance Committee Chair 


  

	 	(c)	Additional $10,000 annual fee for the Audit Committee Chair ($2,500 per quarter) 

  

	2.	Annual award of options to purchase 2,500 common shares of the Company (non-qualified). 

  

	3.	Reimbursement of expenses incurred in personal financial planning of up to $7,500 in any calendar year. 

  

	4.	Participation in Executive Deferred Compensation Plan – allows directors to defer receipt of their director fees and receive a matching contribution of 25% with respect to
those fees, not to exceed $2,500 in any year. 

  

	*	Directors receive 50% of their director and committee fees otherwise payable to them in common shares of the Company under the 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Equity Plan, and may
elect to receive up to 100% of their director and committee fees in common shares.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Jacob Bukowski SkyCinemaPro
940 N Villa Nueva Drive
Litchfield Park

, AZ 85340

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 3828

Dear Mr. Bukowski :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
hometreass1a1ex105_7282011.htm


 



 


Exhibit 10.5
Anthony Jamal KIDD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-394

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| 200 Witmer Road  -  P.O. Box 1015  -  Horsham, PA  19044-8015 GMAC **Commercial Mortgage******Annual Statement as to Compliance For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 ***********COMM 2004 LNB4******Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates***Pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction, I hereby attest that: i.A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation as Master Servicer during the period, and of its performance under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision. ii.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation as Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the period. iii.GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Master Servicer, has received no notice regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund as a REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.  GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION /s/ Brian T. Stauffer Brian T. Stauffer Senior Vice President February 20, 2005 **********.123 G** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2723 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2723

            To suspend temporarily the duty on thiacloprid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on thiacloprid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THIACLOPRID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      3-[(6-Chloro-3-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        pridinyl)methyl]-                                                  31/2015.......
                        2-
                        thiazolidinyliden
                        e]cyanamide
                        (thiacloprid)
                        (CAS No. 111988-
                        49-9) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2934.10.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 265 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 265

To authorize the acquisition of core battlefield land at Champion Hill, 
 Port Gibson, and Raymond for addition to Vicksburg National Military 
                                 Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2011

Mr. Cochran (for himself and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the acquisition of core battlefield land at Champion Hill, 
 Port Gibson, and Raymond for addition to Vicksburg National Military 
                                 Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Champion Hill, Port Gibson, and 
Raymond Battlefields Addition Act''.

SEC. 2. VICKSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK.

    (a) Acquisition of Land.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior (referred to 
        in this Act as the ``Secretary'') may acquire the land or any 
        interests in land within the area identified as ``Modified Core 
        Battlefield'' for the Port Gibson Unit, the Champion Hill Unit, 
        and the Raymond Unit as generally depicted on the map entitled 
        ``Vicksburg National Military Park-Proposed Battlefield 
        Additions'', numbered 306/100986, and dated October 2010.
            (2) Methods of acquisition.--Land may be acquired under 
        paragraph (1) by donation, purchase with donated or 
        appropriated funds, or exchange, except that land owned by the 
        State of Mississippi or any political subdivisions of the State 
        may be acquired only by donation.
    (b) Availability of Map.--The map described in subsection (a)(1) 
shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate 
offices of the National Park Service.
    (c) Boundary Adjustment.--On the acquisition of land by the 
Secretary under this Act--
            (1) the acquired land shall be added to Vicksburg National 
        Military Park;
            (2) the boundary of the Vicksburg National Military Park 
        shall be adjusted to reflect the acquisition of the land; and
            (3) the acquired land shall be administered as part of the 
        Vicksburg National Military Park in accordance with applicable 
        laws (including regulations).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 10/9/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
RUTH COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-3137 (D.C. No. 95-2013-GTV) (D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. ** Ruth Cooper, appearing pro se, appeals from the dismissal of her complaint due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction and absolute judicial immunity, and also from the filing restrictions placed upon her by the district court. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order, together with the parties’ submissions, and find no reversible error. The restrictions imposed on Ms. Cooper were within the court’s power, and in accordance- 2 -

with our precedent. AFFIRMED. All pending motions are DENIED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Harold F. Zagunis, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the
Certificates for periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

      4.    Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed
in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement; and

      5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, that is included
in these reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter Credit Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.,
as Servicer, Cendant Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Servicer, and GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer.

Date: March 31, 2005

/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
--------------------------------------
Signature
Name: Harold F. Zagunis
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL
Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2004-22;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


Date: March 28, 2005


                                  /s/ Steve Bailey
                                  ----------------
                                  Steve Bailey
                                  Senior Managing Director
Justin T. FRIEND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3459

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 03, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                         ELITE ARTZ, INC.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officers of Elite Artz Inc. (the "Company") certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)     the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year
        ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)     the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



Date:   March 27, 2006             /s/ David Oman
                                   ____________________________________
                                   David Oman
                                   Chief Executive and Financial Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In re the Complaint of 

PENSACOLA AVIATION CENTER LLC 

 Complainant, 

 -against- DOCKET NO. 16-12-12 

PENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, 

A DIVISION OF THE CITY OF PENSACOLA 

 

 Respondent. 

Pursuant to Part 16 of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

1. COMES NOW THE COMPLAINANT, Pensacola Aviation Center LLC 

(“Pensacola Aviation”), and files this Motion to Withdraw without prejudice to renew if new 

issues regarding the existing Minimum Standards arise. Pursuant to 14 CFR § 16.19, the 

Complainant may file an application for an order or ruling not otherwise specifically provided 

for by the Part 16 rules of procedure. 

2. The Pensacola International Airport has approved Pensacola Aviation’s 

acquisition of Aerose LLC d/b/a Innisfree Jet Center (“Innisfree”) and the assignment of the 

Innisfree lease to Pensacola Aviation and both parties have agreed that the dismissal of this 

Complaint would be without prejudice in the event that new issues arise regarding the existing 

Minimum Standards. 
2 

3. WHEREFORE, for the reason stated above, undersigned counsel respectfully 

moves to withdraw the Complaint without prejudice in the above-stated docket and terminate 

the Part 16 proceeding. 

Dated: September 9, 2016 

Jericho, New York 

Respectfully submitted, 

Leonard D. Kirsch 

Shelley A. Ewalt 

McBreen & Kopko 

Attorneys for Complainant 

500 North Broadway, Suite 129 

Jericho, New York 11753 

Tel: (703) 399-6078 

Fax: (516) 364-0612 
Certificate of Service 

 I hereby certify that I have today, the 9th day of September, 2016, caused the 

foregoing Motion to Withdraw to be served via electronic mail, on the following: 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., SW. 

Washington, DC, 20591 

Attention: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-610 

9-AWA-AGC-Part-16@faa.gov

Robert J. Williams 

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP 

120 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2700 

Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3001 

RWilliams@Schnader.com

Attorney for Respondent 

________________________________________ 

Shelley A. Ewalt
# Official Journal L 469/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 469 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6430 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 469

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6430 December 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2326 of 30 November 2021 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants
  (notified under document C (2021) 8580)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2326 of 30 November 2021 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants
  (notified under document C (2021) 8580)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C (2021) 8580)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
From: Nicole Singh [mailto:nicole.singh@rggi.org] 

Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 4:56 PM

To: Harvey, Reid

Cc: Lois New; Marissa G. Paslick -PSC-; William.Lamkin@state.ma.us; Wong, Shutsu; Greene, Cynthia; 

Nicole Singh

Subject: RE: RGGI Questions on 111(d)

Hi Reid,

We made some further refinements to the questions and incorporated into the agenda that was 

previously circulated by EPA. Please see below. If you have any question for us before the call, feel to 

reach out. Have a great week-end.

Best,

Nicole

1) EPA walk through the methodology for translating the rate-based target into a mass-based 

target as applied to each of our states.

 Our understanding is that the only way to convert from the RGGI states rate targets to a 

regional RGGI mass-based target is with electricity sector modeling. Is that correct?

 Without comprehensive modeling, is there any preliminary analysis we can use to 

estimate whether the existing regional RGGI cap will meet EPA's proposed emissions 

rate targets for the RGGI states and if not, what changes would be needed in the cap?

o For example, can we use anything from the EPA illustrative scenario modeling as 

a proxy for converting the RGGI state rate targets to a regional mass target?

o Is there anything else the states could consider?

 EPA modeling predicts emissions of 63 million for EPA sources for RGGI states in 2030; 

does this modeling include emissions from new sources and/or non-111(d) sources (e.g. 

combustion turbines)?

 

2) Discuss how the regional RGGI program would demonstrate compliance. In particular, we need 

to identify any program design elements that would be inconsistent with, or pose special 

challenges to, using RGGI for 111(d) compliance.

 The RGGI program includes the potential use of banked allowances, potential for 

additional allowances being available from the Cost Containment Reserve and the use of 

offsets. How would these program elements be reflected in the states’ compliance 

demonstration? 

 How would RGGI states compliance demonstration deal with sources not covered by 

EPA guidelines and new sources?

 Please confirm that demonstration of compliance with a regional mass target on a 

regional basis is sufficient.

Nicole Singh

Executive Director

RGGI, Inc.

90 Church Street, 4th Fl

New York, NY 10007

212-417-7345 (o)

646-675-7323 (m)

nicole.singh@rggi.org