ea$/f 


Cargill Incorporated 


Cedar Rapids - West 


EMISSION TEST REPORT 


Soybean Storage Tank C-IO (EP 95) 


May 26,2004 


Thompson Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

a member of THE COMPUANCE GROUP 

Environmental Engineering. Permitting and Compliance Services 
E:MISSION TEST REPORT 


for 


Cargill Incorporated 


on the 


Soybean Storage Tank C-IO (EP 95) 


located in 


Cedar Rapids, Iowa 


on 


May 26, 2004 

Conducted by 

Comprehensive Emission Services, Inc. 


1112 Maple Street 


West Des Moines, Iowa 50265 


(515) 225-7372 


Project No. 5604 

"'.'."­
TABLE OF CONTENTS 


CONTENTS 

Preface ........................................................................................................................ 2 


Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 


Summary ofResults ................................................................................................... 4 


Sampling and Analytical Procedures ......................................................................... 5 


Method 17 Saznpling Apparatus ................................................................................. 6 


Test Results ................................................................................................................ 7 


Appendix A - Example Calculations 


Appendix B - Laboratory Data Forms 


Appendix C - Field Data Forms 


Appendix D - Pretest Calibrations 


Appendix E - Post-test Calibrations 


Appendix F - Process Data 


Appendix G - Opacity Certification 


TABLES 

Table 1, Summary of Test Results Soybean Storage Tank C-lO (EP 95) ................ ..4 


Table 2, Particulate Emission Results Soybean Storage Tank e-l 0 (EP 95) ........... 7 


FIGURES 

Figure 1, Method 17 Saznpling Apparatus ................................................................ 6 


1 
PREFACE 

This report summarizes the results ofthe data collected on a compliance demonstration 

test at the Cargill Incorporated facility in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. To the best of our 

lmowledge, the data in this report are accurate and complete. Any questions concerning 

this report should be directed to Mr. Tim Titus or Mr. Dan Deatsch. They may be 

reached by phone at (515) 225-7372. 

Dan Deatsch 

June 7, 2004 

(. -

... 

/ "'" 

2 
INTRODUCTION 


An emission test was conducted by Comprehensive Emission Services, Inc. on the 

Soybean Storage Tank: C-IO (EP 95) at the Cargill Incorporated facility in Cedar Rapids, 

Iowa. Three Method 17 with 202 backhalf particulate sampling runs and three Method 9, 

Opacity runs were performed. The testing fulfills the requirements for testing in the 

LCPHD Permits CDS#00010 and AT! #4492. The testing was performed on May 26, 

2004. 

Coordinating the field tests: 

Tim Titus - Comprehensive Emission Services, Inc. 


Amelia Denning - Cargill Incorporated 


Lisa Schmidt - Thompson Environmental Consulting, Inc. 


Conducting the field tests: 

Jay Titus - Comprehensive Emission Services, Inc. 


Dan Deatsch - Comprehensive Emission Services, Inc. 


Matt Milligan - Comprehensive Emission Services, Inc. 


Witnessing the field tests: 

Amy Drahos - Linn County Air Quality Division 

The appendices to this report contain the following information and data: 

Appendix A: 

Appendix B: 

Appendix C: 

Appendix D: 

Appendix E: 

Appendix F: 

Appendix G: 

( ) 

Example Calculations 

Laboratory Data Forms 

FieldDataForms 

Pretest Calibrations 

Post-test Calibrations 

Process Data 

Opacity Certification 

3 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 


In accordance with current IDNR protocol, when less than 10 mg of sample is collected, 

10 mg of sample catch is used for calculations. Sources with sample collections less than 

10 mg are shown with a '<'symbol in the following tables to indicate that actual samples 

were less than the assumed 10 mg catch. Both the actual and the assumed emission rates 

can be found in Appendix C, 

Table 1 summarizes the test results for testing perfonned on the Soybean Storage Tank C10 (EP 95). Three Method 17 with 202 backhalfparticulate sampling runS and three . 

Method 9, Opacity runs were used for testing. The testing fulfills the requirements for 

testing in the LCPHD Permits CDS#OOO1 0 and A TI #4492. The testing was performed 

on May 26, 2004. 

The allowable limit for PM is 0.01 gr/dscf. 

The allowable limit for Opacity is 0%. 

No blank corrections were performed. 

Table 1 


Summary of Test Results 


Soybean Storage Tank C-IO (EP 95) 


Units Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 

PM Net Weight g <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 

PM Emissions gr/dscf <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.0021 

PM Emission Rate lblhr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 

Flow Rate acfm 1,062 1,030 1,307 

Flo\vRate dscfrll 1,056 1,004 00')/.Jw 

Isokinetics % 99.2 98.8 99.0 

Start Time HH:MM 8:24 10:35 12:44 

Stop Time HH:MM 10:26 12:36 14:46 

Opacity % 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Start Time HH:MM 8:30 10:40 13:33 

Stop Time HH:MM 9:30 11:40 14:33 

4 
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

Sampling Procedures 

Particulate emissions were detennined by u.s. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Methods 1,2,3,4, 17,202 and 9. These Methods are titled; 

Method 1 - "Sample and Velocity Traverse for Stationary Sources" 

Method 2 - "Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate 

(Type S Pitot Tube)" 

Method 3 - "Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Excess Air and Dry 

Molecular Weight" 

Method 4 - "Detennination for Moisture Content in Stack Gases" 

Method 17 - "Determination ofParticulate Emissions from Stationary 

Sources (In-Stack Filtration Method)" 

Method 202 - "Determination for Condensible Particulate Emissions from 

Stationary Sources" 

Method 9 - "Visual Determination ofthe Opacity ofEmissions From Stationary 

Sources" 

These methods appear in detail in Title 40, Code ofFederal Regulations (CFR), Part 60, 

Appendix A. 

The Sampling Apparatus is shown in Figure 1 on Page 6. All equipment was calibrated 

at Comprehensive Emission Services' office prior to shipment to the test site. 

Sampling Locations 

A total of24 sample points were used to determine PM emissions. The sample time per 

point was 5 minutes, for a total sampling time of 120 minutes per test run. The stack 

sampling point locations can be found along with the field data sheets in Appendix C. 

Analytical Procedures 

The particulate emission rate was determined following procedures detailed in EPA 

Method 17 and 202. Particulate samples collected on Whatman glass fiber filters were 

analyzed gravimetrically. The probe and nozzles were rinsed with acetone. The rinse 

was transferred to tarred beakers and evaporated to dryness. 

-" 

5 


i 
...._.. 

Stack In-stack Thermocouple Exit Temp Filter SamplEi Probe ----...'" J 

Probe 

Nozzle S Type Pitat Tube 

Ice Bath 

Sample Une 

Thermocouples Fine Vacuum Adjust Gauge 

Orifice ~ 

o 

- I I

Meter 

Leak Free 

Pump 

Schematic of Method 17 Sampling Train 

Figure 1 

,.,., .-~.. , ,'''' .""",." -.--~.~ -----,-_.._.._- .~~"" 
Table 2 


PM Emission Results 


Soylbean Storage TankC-10 (EP 95) 

Parameters Units Run 1 Run 3 Run 4 

PM Emissions 

Actual grJdscf <0.0100 <0.0100 <0.0100 

Weight Collected g <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.0021 

Emission Rate lblhr <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 

Stack Flow Rates 

Velocity ftlmin 5,406 . 5,245 5,282 

Actual acfm 1,062 1,030 1,037 

Standard Conditions dscfin 1,056 1,004 992 

Sampling Results 

Isokinetics % 99.2 98.8 99.0 

Sample Volume dscf 64.777 74.626 73.901 

Avg. Stack Temperature OF 64 76 86 

Avg. Square Root aP inches H20 1.3623 1.3075 1.3049 

Avg.MI inches H2O 1.03 1.40 1.38 

A vg. Meter Temperature OF 71.7 83.5 91.2 

Oxygen % 21.00 21.00 21.00 

Carbon Dioxide % 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Moisture Collected m1 15.0 13.5 17.0 

Moisture % H20 1.1 . 0.8 1.1 

Run Start Time HH:MM 8:24 10:35 12:44 

Run Stop Time HH:MM 10:26 12:36 14:46 

Sampling Time minutes 120 120 120 

Opacity % 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Start Time HH:MM 8:30 10:40 13:33 

Stop Time HH:MM 9:30 11:40 14:33 

Sampling Time minutes 60 60 60 

7 

Appendix A 


Example Calculations 

Symbol 

Qa 

As 

Bws 

Cp 

Cstd 

Dn 

dscfin 

g 

gr/dscfm 

ID 

Md 

Ms 

Qstd 

Pb 

Ps 

SP 

Tm 

Ts 

Vi 

Vr 

Vm 

Vmstd 

Vs 

We 

Wtgain 

y 

9 

% H2O 

% C02 

%02 

%1 

LlH 

LlP 

NOMENCLATURE 

Description . 

Actual cubic feet per minute 

Area of stack 

Percent water 

Pitot tube calibration coefficient 

Concetration of particulate dry basis, standard conditions 

Diameter of nozzle 

Dry standard cubic feet per minute 

Grams 

Grains per dry standard cubic feet per minute 

Inside diameter of stack 

Molecular weight, dry stack gas 

Molecular weight, stack gas 

Stack flow rate, dry standard conditions 

Barometric Pressure 

Stack pressure 

Static pressure 

Average meter temperature 

Temperature of stack gas 

Initial meter reading 

Final meter reading 

Volume meter, actual 

Volume meter, standard conditions 

Average stack gas velocity 

Total moisture collected 

Total particulate matter collected 

. Meter condition factor 

Sampling time 

Percent moisture by volume 

Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry 

Percent oxygen by volume, dry 

Percent isokinetic 

Pressure drop across orifice meter 

Gas velocity pressure 

\ 

'. 
PARTICULATE CALCULATION EQUATIONS 

Runl 

1. Volume of meter ., 

j. 

v'n = (178.457 -114.200)x 1.014 

2. 	 Volume of meter, standard conditions (68" ,29.92 in.Hg) 

17.65x Vm x(~ + 1lH) V _ 13.6 

m{std) - T + 460 III 

17.65x 65.157x (29.88'+ 1.03) 

V _ 13.6 

m{std} - 71.7 +460 

V,n(std) = 64.777 ft3 

3. Percent moisture by volume 

B = 100 x 0.4707 xWc 

\9$ 0.04707 x We + Vm(sId) 

B = 100x0.4707x+15.0 

ws 0.04707x15.0+64.777 

B10'$ =1.1 % 

4. Molecular weight, dry stack gas 

Md =0.16x%C02 +%02 +28.0 

Md =O.16xO.00+21.00+28.0 

Md =28.84 
5. Molecular weight, stack g 

Ms = Md X(l- Bws )+18X(1_ Bws) 100 100 

Ms =28.84X(1-~)+18X(1-~) . 100 100 

M. = 28.72 

6. Stack Pressure 

SP P = P. +­ .r b 13.6 

P = 29.88+ 0.23 

• 13.6 

~ = 29.90 inch. Hg 

7. Velocity of stack gas 

Vs = 60x 85.349 x Cp x 

Vs = 60x85.349xO.99x 64+460 X 1.3623 

29.90 + 28.72 

v.. = 5,406 ftlmin 

8. Percent isokinetic 

100 x (T + 460) x Vm(.j'(d) g

%1 "= ----~~-~~.....<----:

17.65x8x V. xp" X(l- Bws .)X1fx(Dn )2 . 100 24 

1OOx (64 + 460 )'x 64.777 %1 = ----~-~-----':----------:

17.65 x120x 5,406 x 29.90 x (1 ~)x 1fx(0.136)2 100 24 

%1 = 99.2 
9. 	 Area of stack 

ID)2 A :::: 	 n-x ­ s (24 

_ (6.00)2 A -	 n-x -­ s 24 

10. Stack volumetric flow rate actual conditions 

Q :::: 5A06 x 0.20 a 

Ql1 :::: 	 1,062 acfm 

11. 	 Stack volumetric flowrate, standard conditions (68·,29.92 in.Hg) 

17.65x xAs xPs X(l--ffo) 

Ts + 460 

17.65X5,406XO.20X29.90X(1- ~)100 

Qstd :::: 	 64 + 460 

Qstd :::: 1,056 dscfm 

12. 	 Grains per dry standard cubic feet 


:::: 15.43xWtgaih
 CSld 

15.43 x 0.0049 Cstd 64.777 

; C = 0 .0012 gr/dscf std 
13. Emission rate 

Ib 60 x Wtgain x QSld -::::: 

hr 453.5924 x Vm(std) 

Ib 60xO.0012xl,056 == hr 453.5924 x 64.777 

Ib = O.Ollblhr 

hr 

) 

AppendixB 


Laboratory Data Forms 


\ ) " " / 
Project Number: ~~::""'..Ir:~-=t)_t/..:..- ____ 


Plant Name: &r!l i , I 


Date: S- n "'-of 


Analysis Type: 1+ I 2. CJ Z­

,6p 75 


Runl 

Type Iden:tification Final Tare Net 

Number Weight Weight Weight 

Filter p /39(3 ';tbl'1r :;{~ br!-f S .. 0.00 '2 

Probe Rinse ( ml) B 33~8 -::r'-. t0 T~ -=t-b,!o&1 ,,00 J J 

Front HalfWeigbt /0 0 1,] 

Organic ( ml) c 3~'f I J0 2.<?s'1-)(J) 10~-¥1--/4 .. "'0'3 J 

Inorganic }) 3¥B L( I'S ~.OG '3;A 1~7.0b~1- ;0005 

, Total ~et Weight 

." 00 I-I,! 

. Run2 

Type Identification Final Tare I Net 

Number Weight Weight Weight 

Filter r 1399 l.-bo~O L~6(j) =}-3 ," O®cv-=;-' 

Probe Rinse ( ml) B 33i.o9 (;5~ 11-t-&zf b5.f1-d-.1­_OO£) I 

Front HaIfWeight , O(?O~ 

Organic ( ml) ( 3&'IL lo3,j-b54':r {<13 .'1-(:, '3 if ' ... OO-;;tO 

Run 

Probe 

Organic 

3 

Rinse 

Inorganic 

Filter 

Type 

( 

( 

ml) 

ml) 

P

B 

c.. 

D 

Identification 

33tO 

Number 

i

3& 

31./&5 

t.f 00 

t./3 

h?-,6'1tif5 

'?.holl 

/05. 

13bJf~ 

Weight 

Final 

-:r-1J'1 

n 

L{ 

L

13b.4f>1{i~ 

If)3~t-~Q 

b1.61-{1J' 

?. 

Front 

Total 

.

Weight 

b

Tare 

OtfJ 

Half

Net weight 

Weight 

-:r . ,(.700,/ 

,.. 

,; 

,<Of}O 

, 

'OOO~ 

0'001.-/ 

o~

~o3.5 

Weight 

Net 

G 

1­

'1 

Inorganic .D 3l{8~ 153.1r1;}1 1~3.i5--JJ 1 -.. 0005 

Total Net Weight 

Identification 

F =3 inch filter P = 47mm filter B = I50ml Beaker C = 250ml Beaker D =400ml Beaker 

"t:f7b"31­
- -

... -...~. 

I, FINAL WEIGHT 

WEIGHING SHEET 

Time 

Date 

Analyst 

IDNo. Ron 

1 

t> 

s 

?vl!io 

Cheek Weight 

Check Weight 

CheckWejght . 

Ch!;}ck Weight 

Weighing (grams) 

234 5 

Net 


Weight 


Average 


Final 


Weight 


7~61'1 

~c 

=-E­ -' 

,~ 

'S


Tare 


Weight 


COMPREHENSIVE 

EMISSION 

SERVICES 
''-.-" 

TARE WEIGHT 


WEIGHING SHEET 


Time 

Date 

Analyst 

ID No. 

Check Weight 

1 

5-d6,)1... 

Weighing (grams) 

2 3 

S:tJo.sz. < 

4< 5 

:;;. 06 {O 

d. &t30?t!J 

:;. t.5 7t.JJ 

:;? 058'} 

< t. 5/3{P 

to8fJ3 

2· (P1'l5 

d. t01-'S 

-== 
 COMPREHENSIVE 

EMISSION 

< SERVICES 
TARE WEIGHT 


WEIGHING SHEET 


Time iD~()f 

Date 5"-5~oi 

Analyst .D5 

ID No. 

1 

1, 3357­ 67,of!& 

s3!? 0 "11'."¥ G~f 

3359 '1--::t ' '3,;1 Q'Y 

33&>0 4~. &-:fr.f1 

"3 3ft, I (J (P. tfaO/' 

3:>~Z -:r1. 0 rq..1 

.3:;:(03 U4.1-Dz:f1 

]:J~ l( 1-&. /11f 

31102 ~tt, Ell.l15" 

33~to fJlt.ZJ95 

33br (;~, 3/ dJ.3ioB '1to.1OluiP 

CheckWc;:ight '";j 0 ~ -03[if 

1:;;1.-;} 

s-'J ~vt.f 

./16 . Weighing (grams) 

2 3 

(;1-.DL/f Y 

fY. }lMJI'1 

71.3J..t b 

(,~ .l.i 1- l(J' 

b&. 'Y()of 

'1-1,O3?!)' 

U, 7D?Y? 

1&.(t8'0 

."71'. Bt15" 

/Ju. 11q7­

ulL. d31> 

f/g.IO&7 " 

'"7D.o3r r.f 

. 

4 

• 

• ' it< '~"',,:9.':ot . '. '~'~ '''1 .>"", •••t:.. .~..". ~ 

1\'~~·' 

,;r.··~ $! ..."., ... " 

~.,: . 

Ij.';~.. ::::...... <~:~_I Average 

5 i 

It T. D4'Bii:~.~iJJla~ 

1-T.3a01 

i9lP. &.-=t4)? 

G;~. 4CD"1­

'1-1 .O"'i{:f-d 

lul.,:-=f 004 

1-&. r:rTCJ 

1-"1-. J(.,q5 

l.ol.o. 1?rq (p 

ft,b.Cl313 

1-(.,. 10u-:}­

::. C -- COMPREHENSIVE 

B EMISSION 

§ S~ SERVICES 
TARE WEIGHT 


WEIGHING SHEET 


Time 

Date 

Analyst 

ID No. 

1 

Check Weight 

Weighing (grams) 

2 3 

'g3?7­

, fcf7- J 

!.a57-S 

4 5 

Average 

'7fi.o , 

~5 ~·t13itl 

fJi. 

'1t. ~ 5-:r,'>' 

':/-¥. '1Q,,2 ~ 

&,.. tfO"':}-S' 

iPS. 105Q D 

{pIP. 13DI../ 

11. ;n· L{ I . 

ec;MPREHENSIVE 

EWSSION 

~ERVICES 

....,-..".-.,.. ,... --~ ......... .

-.. -".;. 

TARE WEIGHT 


WErGHrNG SHEET 


Time &/'Vf:5 

Date 5-03-GJV 

Analyst 1h_IJ~ #t-A 

Weighing (grams) 

COMPREHENSIVE 

EMISSION 

SERVICES. 

ID No. lI 2 3 

,... 

"., 

... 

-

Check Weight I/RO, oVdD 111m ,bOd 0 

4 5 
'--_..' 

TARE WEIGHT 


WEIGHING SHEET 


Tilne /0 :Jo 

Date 5-S-'Drj 

Analyst Dfr 

ID No. 

1 

C p~VZ (01,11036 

3t. Vj ID3.1F1D 

"Swr(l( [o~. 015':2 

"J~ VS {Oa-. (0 <1 Lfr 3., V" t 03. '1 l u4 

}(Pl/1 /O&.qCJSD 

Jt:,ftt 1oil. t/'S'11 

;{; Y7 f DJ~~IO)o 

J.{p S"D ID171fY 

3~ sl 'D4.l/11 ) 

'J (gS2-­ I u~. 51?O, 

(Ilt J".5:> qt.31~r 

Check Weight !~C).a:?>06 

'1:2 0 

5: 1--(j~ 

,Oft 

Weighing (grams) 

2 3 

(f) ~.1&t{ 0 

1b3·l' 'l;j.D 

Ioli. (yt5 ~ 

/DJ-. uQ 4 l.P 

Lrl~ .. '1/&{P 

I()IR::')? ),2 

loL{.Q59F 

/7JI./.1/.05D 

l(it./.g IY't ' 

10l{.. t[t7 dIDl.{. S'ljo3 

17 -31<11 

tOO. oD 0 i) 

4 

. 

5 

•

~~~:~~<~1:::,,': ,\$j~' .•m·l,~ , ' . :I~' ~~ .:.:.. ? ~.if '-:«-. -:::e:"~ .. •••••• : 1>;/ ".: .\: ~.?:"A '" 

Average 

103·Th3'1. 

103, "':f i?1-0 

IDCo, 01- 5;) 

lOa. (PQ<./l 

103, Cj I iPS' 

fDu·'195/ 

lO4.tj5q~ 

104.405D 

104. ¥I)?l? 

i04. lj (-:t- ") 

J04. 5'<i?O "> 

OJ <6 .3r1?4 

COMPREHENSIVE 

EMISSION 

SERVICES 
...• 

TARE WEIGHT 


WEIGHING SHEET 


Time 

Date 

Analyst 

IDNo. 

1 

.:)-'1- -oLjWeighing (grams) 

2 3' 

is''1.0 UJ J. (f1'.5& .1..{ f?:> ., 

;r·llA 

I r ..... • I . _ . "7~a 0 I .-. T'/ I I 

Check Weight IfD.03l13 I ll-a,D'3Q 

4 5 

Average 

\5'1.0 {per={ 

r~L.L\~o4 

. 1 IJ I~ ,.,......,.­

luto.34Q5 

COMPREHENSIVE 

EMISSION 

SERVICES 
Appendix C 


-Field Data Forms 


i 


I 


I 


I 


I-


i 

Run No. 

Location: 

Date: 

Project # 

1. assume 10mg 

Cargill CR West (EP 95) 

May 26. 2004 

5604 

% Isokinetic= 99.2 

Initial Meter Volum~ (Cubic Feet)= 

Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 

Meter FactorFinal Leak Rate (cu Ftlmin)= 

Net meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 

Gas Volume (Dry Std Cubic Feet 68 De9)= 

114.200 

178.457 

1.014 

0.000 

65.157 

64.777 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) = 

Static Pressure (Inches H20)= 

Stack Pressure (in Hg)= 

29.88 

0.23 

29.90 

Percent Oxygen :::: 

Percent Carbon Dioxide::: 

Moisture Collected(ml)= 

Percent Water= 

21.00 

0.00 

15.0 

1.1 

Average Meter Temperature (F)= 

Average Delta H ( in H20)= 

Average Delta P (inches H20)= 

Average Stack Temp (F)= 

.pry Molecular Weight= 

··'Wet Molecular Weight:::: 

71.7 

1.03 

1.8875 

64 

28.84 

28.72 

Sampling Time (Minutes)= 

Nozzle Oiameter(lnches)= 

Stack Diameter (lnches)= 

Stack Area (Square Feet) = 

Pitot Coefficient=: 

Average Square Root of Delta P (inches H20)= 

120.0 

0.136 

6.00 

0.20 

0.99 

1.3623 

Stack Velocity (Actual. ftlmin)= 

Flow Rate (Actual. Cubic ftImin)= 

Flow Rate (Std, Dry, Cubic ftlmin 68 Deg)= 

5,406 

1,062 

1,056 

Particulate Loading - Front Half 

Particulate Weight Net (9)= 

Pati~ulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (grlscf)= 

Emission Rate (lblhr)= 

0.0013 

0.0003 

0.00 

Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers 

( 

Particulate Weight Net (9)= 

. Particulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Oeg (grlscf)= 

)Emission Rate (!blhr)= 

Percent Impinger Catch= 

0.0100 

0.0024 

0.02 

87.00 
Run No. 1 


Location: Cargill CR West (EP 95) 


Date: May 26,2004 


. Project # 5604 

% Isokinetic= 99.2 

Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 114.200 

Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 178.457 

Meter Factor- 1.014 

Final Leak Rate (cu Ftlmin)= 0.000 

Net meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 65.157 

Gas Volume (Dry Std Cubic Feet 68 Oeg)= 64.777 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) = 29.88 

Static Pressure (Inches H20)= 0.23 

Stack Pressure (in Hg)= 29.90 

Percent Oxygen = 21.00 

Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.00 

Moisture Collected(ml)= 15.0 

Percent Water= 1.1 

Average Meter Temperature (F)= 71.7 

Average Delta H (in H20)= 1.03 

Average Delta P (inches H20)= 1.8875 

Average Stack Temp (F)= 64 

'pry Molecular Weight= 28.84 

'Wet Molecular Weight= 28.72 

Sampling Time (Minutes)= 120.0 

Nozzle Oiameter(lnches)= 0.136 

Stack Diameter (Inches)= 6.00 

Stack Area (Square Feet) = 0.20 

Pitot Coefficient= 0.99 

Average Square Root of Delta P Onches H20)= 1.3623 

Stack Velocity (Actual. ftlmin)= 5,406 

Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ftlmin)= 1.062 

Flow Rate (Std, Dry, Cubic ftlmin 68 Oeg)= 1,056 

Particulate Loading - Front Half 

Particulate Weight Net (g)= 0.0013 

Paticulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (grlscf)= 0.0003 

Emission Rate (Iblhr)= 0.00 

Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including lmpingers 

Particulate Weight Net (g)= 0.0049 

. Particulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (grlscf)= 0.0012 

" ) Emission Rate (Iblhr)= 0.01 

Percent lmpinger Catch= 73.47 
Run No. 2, assume 10mg 

Location: Cargill CR West (EP 95) 

Date: May 26,2004 

.Project# 5604 

% Isokinetic'= 

Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 


Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet):::: 


Meter Factor-


Final Leak Rate (cu Ftlmin)= 


Net meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 


Gas Volume (Dry Std Cubic Feet 68 Deg)= 


Barometric Pressure (in Hg) = 


Static Pressure (Inches H20)= 


Stack Pressure (in Hg)= 


Percent Oxygen ::: 


Percent Carbon Dioxide::: 


Moisture Collected{ml)= 


Percent Water= 


Average Meter Temperature (F)= 


Average Delta H ( in H20)= 


Average Delta P (inches H20)= 


Average Stack Temp (F)= 


Dry Molecular Weight= 


'Wet Molecular Weight= 


Sampling Time (Minutes)::: 


Nozzle Diameter{lnches)= 


Stack Diameter (Inches)= 


Stack Area (Square Feet) = 


. Pitot Coefficient= 

Average Square Root of Delta P (inches H20)= 

Stack Velocity (Actual, ftlmin)= 


Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ftlmin)= 


Flow Rate (Std, Dry, Cubic ftlmin 68 Deg)= 


Particulate Loading - Front Half 


Particulate Weight Net (g)= 


Paticulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (grlscf)= 


Emission Rate (Ib/hr)= 


Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers 


Particulate Weight Net (g)= 

. Particulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (grlscf)= 

. ) Emission Rate (Iblhr)= 

Percent Impinger Catch= 

98.8 

178.900 

254.496 

1.014 

0.000 

76.654 

74.626 

29.88 

0.23 

29.90 

21.00 

0.00 

13.5 

0.8 

83.5 

1.40 

1.7292 

76 

28.84 

28.75 

120.0 

0.150 

6.00 

0.20 

0.99 

1.3075 

5,245 

1,030 

1,004 

0.0008 

0.0002 

0.00 

0.0100 

0.0021 

0.02 

92.00 
Run No. 2 

Location: Cargill CR West (EP 95) 

Date: May 26, 2004 

Project # ·5604 

% Isokinetic= 

Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)::: 


Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 


Meter Factor-


Final leak Rate (cu Ftlmin)= 


Net meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 


Gas Volume (Dry Std Cubic Feet 68 Deg)= 


Barometric Pressure (in Hg) ::: 


Static Pressure (Inches H20)::: 


Stack Pressure (in Hg)= 


Percent Oxygen = 


Percent Carbon Dioxide= 


Moisture tollected(ml)= 


Percent Water-


Average Meter Temperature (F)= 


Average Delta H ( in H20)= 


Average Delta P (inches H20)= 


Average Stack Temp (F)= 


Dry Molecular Weight= 


·Wet Molecular Weight= 


Sampling Time (Minutes)::: 


Nozzle Diameter(lnches)= 


Stack Diameter (Inches)::: 


Stack Area (Square Feet) = 


. Pitot Coefficient= 

Average Square Root of Delta P (inches H20)= 

Stack Velocity (Actual, ftlmin)= 


Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ftlmin)= 


Flow Rate (Std, Dry, Cubic ftlmin 68 Oe9)= 


PartiCUlate Loading - Front Half 


Particulate Weight Net (g)= 


Paticulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Oeg (gr/set)= 


Emission Rate (Ib/hr)= 


Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers 


PartiCUlate Weight Net (g)= 

Particulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (gr/set)::: 

j Emission Rate (Ib/hr)= 

Percent Impinger Catch= 

98.8 

178.900 

254.496 

1.014 

0.000 

76.654 

74.626 

29.88 

0.23 

29.90 

21.00 

0.00 

13.5 

0.8 

83.5 

1.40 

1.7292 

76 

28.84 

28.75 

120.0 

0.150 

6.00 

0.20 

0.99 

1.3075 

5,245 

1,030 

1,004 

0.0008 

0.0002 

0.00 

0.0035 

0.0007 

0.01 

77.14 
Run No. 3, assume 10mg 


Location: Cargill CR West (EP 95) 


Date: May 26, 2004 


Project # 5604 


% Isokinetic= 99.0 

Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 255.100 

Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 331.023 

Meter Factor= 1.014 

Final Leak Rate (cu Ftlmin)= 0.000 

Net meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 76.986 

Gas Volume (Dry Std Cubic Feet 68 Deg)= 73.901 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg) = 29.88 

Static Pressure (Inches H20)= 0.23 

Stack Pressure (in Hg)= 29.90 

Percent Oxygen ::: 21.00 

Percent Carbon Dioxide= 0.00 

Moisture CoUected(ml)::. 17.0 

Percent Water- 1.1 

Average Meter Temperature (F)= 91.2 

Average Delta H (in H20)= 1.38 

Average Delta P (inches H20)= 1.7250 

Average Stack Temp (F)= 86 

Dry Molecular Weight:::: 28.84 

Wet Molecular Weight= 28.72 

Sampling Time (Minutes)= 120.0 


Nozzle Diameter{lnches)= 0.150 


Stack Diameter (Inches)= 6.00 


Stack Area (Square Feet) = 0.20 


. Pitot Coefficient= 0.99 


Average Square Root of Delta P Onches H20)= 1.3049 


Stack Velocity (Actual, ftlmin)= 5,282 


Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ftlmin)= 1,037 


. Flow Rate (Std, Dry, Cubic ftlmin 68 De9)= 992 


ParticUlate Loading - Front Half 

ParticUlate Weight Net (g)= 0.0008 

Paticulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (grlscf)= 0.0002 

Emission Rate (Ib/hr)= 0,00 

Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including lmpingers 

Particulate Weight Net (g)= 0.0100 

,Particulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (grlscf)= 0.0021 

~, .)Emission Rate (Iblhr)= 0.02 

Percent' Impinger Catch= 92.00 
Run No. 3 

Location: Cargill CR West (EP 95) 

Date: May 26,2004 

Project # 5604 

% Isokinetic= 

Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 


Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 


Meter Factor-


Final Leak Rate (cu Ftlmin)= 


Net meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 


Gas Volume (Dry Std Cubic Feet 68 Deg)= 


Barometric Pressure (in Hg) = 


Static Pressure (Inches H20)= 


Stack Pressure (in Hg)= 


Percent Oxygen = 


Percent Carbon Dioxide= 


Moisture Collected(ml)= 


Percent Water-


Average Meter Temperature (F)= . 


Average Delta H ( in H20)= 


Average Delta P (inches H20)= 


Average Stack Temp (F)= 


.\Dry Molecular Weight= 


AJVet Molecular Weight= 


Sampling Time (Minutes)= 


Nozzle Diameter(lnches)= 


Stack Diameter (lnches)= 


Stack Area (Square Feet) = 


Pitot Coefficient= 


Average Square Root of Delta P (inches H20)= 


Stack Velocity (Actual, ftlmin)= 


Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ftlmin) = . 


Flow Rate (Std, Dry, Cubic ftlmin 68 Deg)= 


Particulate Loading - Front Half 


Particulate Weight Net (g)= 


Paticulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (gr/set)= 


Emission Rate (Iblhr)= 


Particulate Loading - Total Catch Including Impingers 


Particulate Weight Net (g)= 

Particulate Loading, Dry Std. 68 Deg (gr/sct)= 

}Emission Rate (Ib/hr)= 

. Percent Impinger Catch= 

99.0 

255.100 

331.023 

1.014 

0.000 

76~986 

73.901 

29.88 

0.23 

29.90 

21.00 

0.00 

17.0 

1.1 

91.2 

1.38 

1.7250 

86 

28.84 

28.72 

120.0 

0.150 

6.00 

0.20 

0.99 

1.3049 

5,282 

1.037 

992 

0.0008 

0.0002 

0.00. 

0.0037 

0.0008 

0.01 

78.38 
- -- - -- -- --

---- --

=-c- - - COMPREHENSTVE =-E-== - - EMISSrON 

-

- S-­

. --

-- --. SERVICES 

Project Number"__5"i.---'(;=----=-O...:.Y______ Project Leader 1)4", J)e-.f,s&-(..... 

Meter Operator .1)..,...... ~_ r.:5tt-'-... 

Lab Person ____________ 

2 ~/ Assumed Moisture % Meter Number ~ 

l\.fin.utes Per Point (min.) 2- Oven Number -­

Sampling Time (min.) 1.;16 Umbilical Number ..)~ ~Iv.... 


MeterFactorY / 0/7' PitotNumber .:Jfi 


Meter AH@ /. '7t I Probe Number :FA-' 


Pitot Coefficient Cp ,"7'2 Probe Length ....3=-'__ 


C 1'/ StackA."'ris 1 (inch.) ____ Nozzle Type .:s.:S. 

6' /' Stack Axis 2 (inch.) --=-___ 

Barometric Pressure (in. Hg) 4"r Sff 

Static Pressure (in. H20) ; ;)3 

Nozzle Diameter (incb.) .; /3C 

Leak. Rate Before 

Leak. Rat6 After 

Pitat Leak. Check 

RECOVERY DATA 


Schematic of .Testing Location 

Orsat Imprngers. 

Trial %C02 %C02+%02 %02 

1 

A Mb/"c;PI¢- . 

3" 

Avg 

Final Initial Difference 

Impinge! 1 /00 /()O ~ 

Impinger2 100 /00 ~ 

Impinger3 /00' /00 ~ 

Impinge! 4: 1-;i~.? 7/£S­ 15 

Condition/Color Total 15 

Filter Number: 
Field Data Sheet 

Run No .__-'-/----=~~-­

Project No. .56 0 i 


Location £'P95'" (4."'~' II (../( tr1.:.s.,..... 


') 	 Date s;I;~ "I WI 

Operator J)"".... D-e...hi.t... 

Start Time ---=.8'......;:•..;'J:-'1...!..-____ 

stop Time ~/t~'J-~:J<.:';.!t:.....-____ 

C(J 

/1<' 

II>~ 

~'T 

~C 

,(t" 

.It ~t1" 

/;:L. 6£ 

7y 

If""tj 711/ 

a"C 75" 

79 

77 

7'7 7::;­

79 7.s79 7.s­

'7 

"I J ~.2. Lf 

, 77 "Y 

77 y !>~ 

",/7 '7 ~. 

Notes: 

-'j 

'. J 
-- -- - -- - - - - - -

- -

'C­

-

- ---- COMPREHENSlVE =E= - - EMIssroN 

--

=-- S·=-­

- SERVICES 

Project Number·-....%~~~O~o/.:.----'-____ 

RUll.Number_,......:2...... · --,-________ 

Date S-h£~ 

Plant 

srunple1YP: 

Ca'7P 

h0ktO­

-/1 CI( We.:> 4­

Location £. p 96 

Assumed Moisture % ::2. 

Jyf:inlltes Per Point (min.) ~ 

Srunpling Time (min.) I;;?C? 


Meter Factor Y /, (J/'t 


Meter AH@ I. 9,/ 


Pitot Coeffic::i.ent Cp • '7"7 


/,~I'

StackAxis 1 (inch.) --:"'::;.......__ 


/'4"/

Stack Axis 2 (inch.) _tl=--__ 

A~J. 'L"1..r' 

Meter Number 


Oven Nu:rnher 


. (. Hg).:z "? $"S Barom.etdc Pressure m. .......,.....---

Stalic Pressure (ill. ~O) _...=-"_:2_3___ 

Nozzle Diameter (inch.) " ,rO 

Orsat 

Trial %C0 %01­ %C02 1+%02

RECOVERY DATA 


Avg 

) 

Umbilical Number d'!tt>p ~..tPitot Number J /JProbe Number 3;4­

Probe Length ? I 

_"" NozzleType ~J 

Project Leader 'D A...... ~.J-0 

Meter Operator ~...... D.<I"c,," <t--.:set... 

Lab Person _________-'-__ 

:JZ: 

-

Initial Meter Volume (:ft3) 

Final Meter Volume (:ft3) 

Leak Rate After ,,,0. 

Pitot Leak Check 

Schematic of Testing Location 

Impingers 

Final Initial Difference 

Impingerl 100 lao iQ.. 

Impinger 2 to/) /00 l5l... 

Impinger3 /I?i.'> /~o ().. 

Impinger4 61/( 5 ~~131' 13,5 

Condition/Color Total /J;S 

Filter Number: 

j 

r 

I, 

1 

2 

3 

I 
Run No ._--"-~~----,,.--.,-­

--..L~'--L-__ 

Field Data Sheet 

Project No. ­

,Location ~P?:r c..,.~Ji CR j,v~.sJ­

) Date s1u/P·v . Operator sn::. 1)~ '" ~.:). Start Time ........!..::::...:.....::...:::....____ 

Stop Time -.-:...:;/2::...!:-"".3~6~___ 

il II> 

Notes: 

} 

". 
- --

- -- - - -- -- -- - --

-- --

:..c­

-- ---- COMPREHENSTVE

--

=E=- EMISSION 

--

- S­ -- -- SERVICES 

Project Numher·--,.n~t~o~o/_..:..-_____ Project Leader 'lJ........... 1:) c'__f-~L... 

RrmNumber·__3~_____________ Meter Operator j).,.,..... b .......... rJ-..s.".'c, 


Lab Person ___________________
 Date S-/:Y'ib7' 7 I ' 

Sample Type 1117/?-0 ~ Support Personnel N.... tJ- 11--tI.:jq..... 

Plant C~''7;/1 CJe WG-~ ~ Joy V:1Iv..s 

Location &e 9~ 

Assumed Moisture % :2 Meter Number ::r;z::: 

Minutes Per Point (min.) Oven Number Nh 


Sampling Time (min.) Ij'tl) Umbilical Number .JaLIjV4- ' 


MeterFactorY / -' Of¥" PitotNmnber 3ft 

Meter tlli@ I, 9~ / Probe Number?/JPitot Coefficient Cp ~ 91 Probe Length ;? I 

6'/1' StackAxis 1 (inch.) ___ Nozzle Type --,~=~;....'__ Schematic ofTesting Location 

Stack Axis 2 (inch.) -=-1'_,/'_'___ 

Barometric Pressure (in. Hg) f)? 8~ 

Static Pressure (in. H20) .;2 3 

Nozzle Diameter (inch.) _-=-'_1_54_'0_'__ 

Initial Meter Volume eM ;l>.s:/elo 

Final Meter Volume (ft3) ..)'"5/ &:2 <' ,-, 

Leak Rate :Before J Oe;?,E) CFM~ ~ 15 mHg 

Leak Rate After .-c:ioOCFM.@(' /6 in.Hg 

Pitot Leak Check V Before / After 

RECOVERY DATA 


Orsat Impingers 


Trial %C02 %COZ+%02 %02 

1 

Avg 

3 

2 Afvlb/cl'I.rIFinal Initial Difterence 

Impinger 1, fiJi) /{)o b( 

Impinger2 loa /00 <Q. 

Impinger3 /f)D 100 ,~ 

ConditionlColor 

Impinger4 S>~ 217-'/ 

Total 

11­

IT 

Filter Number: 
Field Data Sheet 

Project No. .......il~()~¥L--___ 


Location 13f'f5'" c4pilli t t!. W,,-s';", 

'\ Date ¢tjt;r 

Operator ~" b .. t;srt. 


start Time -'2-=-:..-;)'I"-'y'--___ 


Stop Time .....-!-/41,-':-:,~-",,~,,--___ 


Notes: 

) 
Preliminary Velocity 


Date,_~~.!!!.+..!:!:....,--__--::---_ 

Locatio 

Stack I.D._~_~ 6 IJ ______ 

.' 	

Pitot 

Static 

Cp 

Pressure 

I 7.,­

in H20,-----­

Barometer Press~re [rI. Hg ;(ii1j, ?$' A Start Time,_~7_,_o_r;.......______ 


Stop Time'--=-_--':::=- 7:/>. _____ 

Operators D .... "'; D&. /-::x.L.. 

SCHEMATIC OFTRAVERSE POlf\JTLAYOUT 

Final Pitot Leak Check at ~3" HP P I F 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

Velocity 

Head 

l::.P 

In. H2 O 

.stack 

Temp.

OF 

Cyclonic 'Flow 

Determination 

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

Velocity 

Head 

AP 

m:.H.p 

Stack 

Temp

of 

Cyclonic FloW 

Determination , 

LlP at o· 

Reference 

Angle Which 

Yields 

aNullll.P 

AP at O· 

Reference 

Angle Which 

Yields 

a Nuli'!!.P 

A.. I /".'3 51. 91 b:7.. 3 S'L 

.2 i(>3 52 .2 ..3 152 

:3 LJ... 3 57 3.12 .. 3 57­

4 /, '/ !J~ " 1:1;..2­ .5"£ 

S­ J~ if n I S'.1.. 0 5(.. 

c 1/.5"' $', c '..' S£ 

"/ R3 bk" '? 1.6 57 

? ?.. C SJ. r I_C. S7 

9 J.. ( 5"'6­ , I.,. 'I .s;:; 

/t). ,~.J <f', .s-" 1o I,,~ 5'.c 

1/ R,1 f£ i IJ 1 .. ;7 S~ 

/'3­ A.,.: 7 g ./ :J­ ~3 ;.>J 

Notes: 

IJ rp ~ //117 ' 

..;.­ .sh",)... h:~-:: S-6 	 '=-c == COMPREHENSNE 

-.E= EMISSION

... 	 - s= 'SERVICES 
Total Number of Points(8,12, 16,20,24}= 24 EP 95 

Stack Diameter or Length(inches}= 6 

Round 

Point Distance 

1 0.1 

2 0.4 

3 0.7 

4 1.1 

5 1.5 

6 2.1 

7 3.9 

8 4.5 

9 4.9 

10 5.3 

11 5.6 

12 5.9 

Square 

1 0.1 

2 0.4 

3 0.6 

4 0.9 

5 1.1 

6 1.4 

7 1.6 

8 1.9 

9 2.1 

10 2.4 

11 2.6 

12 2.9 

If stack diameter is less than 24 inches each point must be greater than 0.5 inches from wall 

if stack diameter is greater than 24 inches each point must be greater than 1.0 inches from wall 
X~Pohl 

I 

Dt JL­ 0 

_I.l/L- « ~ I

lid.""", 

VISIBLE EMISSION g~~ERVATION FORM 1 I""....' 1~luln 1 I { 1- I ~ :< 
 _~onVEOF<1m~ _I I ! I 


b=~~~~~~~~~ 

t­

~!Z~ "{ ~{, I SIal1lm$ cr;}# IEndTrns 1;}() ~ 0 15 W 46 ~ 

1 0 0 0,0 i 

2 0 0 0 O! 

a //10 CJ 0 

4 010 10 0 ij f.ZLcJ 0 0 6 OTO OiO 

70fJO() 

a 0 0 0 10 - 9 ri­ rJ 0 0 I 10 I 0 (j tJ 0 

11 0 to () 0 12 010- U 0 13 0 f) () 0 

14 0 (j 0 io 

16 or 0 (J 0 

17 (J.O () 0 

1800()O 

19. 00 Of) 

20 0 0 0 0 

21 () 0 10 0 

22 DOlO 0 23 ()O Of) 

24 noon 28 -0 0 () () 

~ () 0 tJ () 77 tJ fJ /JID 28 00 Of) 29 0 (jO 0 3D 00 rJ () 
r . 

FiiclllvNome C. I( 

Ot _1m n 

. I J]LOfm I· • I

-­

EPA 

VlSIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1 I....... [R[(J[I1[ [.2[- a 2 I 
 ~e~OOA roa! 0I1sJ: . I l..-.cortlnued_OIlVEO_I'otm_Number ___-L--L!-L1---ll_IL-I 

Cctn!XID1'~ C: ({ 

VEOF1,1 

~~'* c:~fill S'a11'rnalfl ft f! t-( :'ffJ IEndTrn& /l:'fd Sac 0 15 30 45 Comment'l MIn 

1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 3 0 () 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 

.5 () 0 if) 0 & 0 0 10 0 7 () 0 0 0 a ,0 0 () 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 10 .0 !O 10 0 11 0 0 10 0 12 0 10 If) 10 13 0 0 0 '/) 14 0 {J 0 tJ 

15 !J 10 10 0 

16 0 0 0 0 

17 () 0 0 0 18 10 0 10 0 

19 

o~ 0 20. (J [j 

Zl o 0 f) 0 22­ 0 (J 0 0 28 0 O· IlJ 0 24 I() 0 0 0 ·25 10 1£1 0 0 26 (J 0 0 7) 27 () IJ () 0 28 0 0 0 0 

f9 D 0 {} (j 

;ID cJ 0 0 0 
EPA 

VlSIB EEMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1 r..... If \liIh I 1:2.1- 2 a f e01e~w. 2Il3Il otlar. ,CooIkltledonl&J m~ I II 


ViOF1,,1 

c QbsaIVoilon Dale IlIrn&Zcm S!alTh'na 'IEndTrne 

~ 0 15 30 AS Corri:'nenl$ 

1 0 (J 0 () 

2 0 0 0 0 

s , 0 0 0 0 4 0 {j 0 0 Ii 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 (j 0 0 1 0 rJ If) [) 

1Ie1ct\tQfErnli$. PI. Re!, to a 0 0 '0 () 

End . Slat End 9 (j rJ 0 _0 10 0 0 (j () 

n 0 0 0 fJ 

12 0 0' 0 0 13 () () /) 0 

1" 0 () 0 0 -. NOI1!lD 15 () 0 0 () 

i 16 () CJ 17 f) () MS18 () 0 It? () 19 0 () 0 0 , 20 6 0 0 0 21 0 (J () 0 22 0 0 D 0 23 0 0 () () 24 0 !J 0 0 

26 rJ (J 0 (), 

Of _l1E1' n 

I

, _1m' I 

« ~ 

26 () 0 0 0 27 () 0 D (J 2a 0 0 0 () 811.- 29 () () f) 0 30 0 0 0' 0 

.rr~n,<:I_: __----------I1= 
ClI VISIBLE EMISSION g~~ERVATION FORM 1 r..... IR Iv III I I J 1- I
 l:sr&Qlek ~ 200a ~er. I Gq~~M~ Fam~ " ! I I I 
 " 

r­ ( 

Ot 0 

IJiL.fm "' • I 

1I<I<o'llllw 

14!l' 

----------.------------­ &JI\ LocCIIIon IJn& 

VEOF1.l 

~N~r; llmaZ~ IllaIFma,); 3J IErdrrne/9 ')6~ :}} Ce/1 t"(t I 

~ n 15 30 46 ComrnenlS 

1 0 0 17 0 

2 0 0 0 0 a {I (j 0 0 4 0 10 0 () 

Ii 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 

, () () 0 0 

8 () 0 0 IJ '1 (! 10 10 0 (l 0 

11 () 0 0 V 12 0 0 () If) 13 0 0 0 

14 --;; 10 (j 

~ 0 o () 

:: 7;l 

0 o {/ 

/J 00 

lB 0 0 0 tJ 

19 fJ 0 0 10 20 10 IJ 0 ItJ 21 (J 0 0 10 22 () 1(') II) 0 28 0 0 0 tJ 24 10 0 10 (j 

:IS '0 1.0 0 0 

26 0 0 0 If) 'Z1 (j 0 0" 0 

2S /J 0 0 o. 29 0 0 10 () 30 0 

.J. 

,,.4..; 
EPA 


VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1 


ene) 

200A 20sa OItior. 

Obsel'loik:n t:laIa JrnaZone 5tat1lma II!ndTrna 

Mh 0 15 :ro 45 Coomsnls 

1 () () 0 0 2 (j 0 6 IJ ,; 0 0 f) 0 4 0 0 0 0 ~ () 0 0 0 

J 

I 

4­ 0 0 0 () 

7 0 () 0 0 

HeIgll of EmIlS. pt. REt Ie 0b<eIVar 8 0 0 0 () 

IDllfalCQtQ ErTiIo. I't. 

IStat End 

Stat End 9 0 (j CI 0 10 '0 0 0 0 

Ve:l!cdArdEifoPll-r>t. IOllllC:llalto Cbs. Pt.~) 

Slat End Istat I'M 

11 IJ t? () () 

DI!\'cInee and 1l~1o 0bseIIIaIIal1'<l1nl rrom Em\5.I1(X\ I't*tt 

Slat end 

e:o~o "'01· 

12 0 0 () 0 13 0 () 0 0 

14 10 () 0 (J 

lIS fJ 0 0 () 16 0 0 0 0 

End 

SII{ Condllo!1B 

End Slat nd 

End 

'17 () 0 a 0 i 18 0 0 0 0 

;9 () 0 0 0 ; 20 0 0 /J 0 

Source Layout Sl:eIoh 21 CJ (J 0 0 22 0 () () 0 23 0 0 0 D X~1'oi'It 

I 

24 0 (j () (] 

25 () () () 0 

Dt _FEET 0 

I- FEfT 

I , 'j 1llI._ 

26 0 %i~ (j 27 0 () 

28 () 0 0 /J 

2'1 0 (j 0 /J 30 f) () O· d 

V!CF1.l 

" 
· \ 

:' 

AppendixD 


Pretest Calibrations 

METER CALlBRA TION 

Operator Daniel Boes K Factor 0.6274 

Date May 14,2004 Meter Number 5 

}Previous Y Factor 1.009 Orifice Number 23 

j 

RUN 1 RUN2 

Meter Volume 

Final Cubic Feet 97.465 103.082 

Initial Cubic Feet 91.900 97.500 

Net Cubic Feet 5.565 5.582 

Meter Temperature 

Inlet 

Initial Oeg. F 65.0 68.0 

Final Oeg. F 68.0 70.0 

Outlet 

Initial Oeg.F 63.0 64.0 

Final Deg.F 64.0 66.0 

Avg. Meter Temp Oeg.F 65.0 67.0 

Time sec 420.0 420.0 

Meter Delta H inches H2O 2.20 2.20 

Barometric Pressure inches Hg 30.10 30.10 

Room Temperature 

') 

i. 

Initial Oeg.F 71.0 71.0 . 

Final Deg.F 71.0 72.0 

Avg.Room Temperature Oeg.F 71.0 71.5 

Pump Vacuum inches Hg 17 17 

Vcr (std) dscf 5.737 5.734 

Vm (std) dscf 5.658 5.654 

Y Factor 1.014 1.014 

Delta H@ 1.969 1.953 

Average Y 1.014 

Average Delta H@' 1.961 

+/- 2% Criferia 


Percent of Avg Y 0.01 


PASS 


+/- 5% Criteria 


Percent of Final Y 0.49 


PASS 

CONSOLE WORK SHEET 


Operator: l)y\~-c..\ ~2 . K Factor: O. (D;;) ?:;e-i 

Date: s: l4 -0-4 Meter LD. _____ '5 __ __ 

Previous Y Factor: J.00::1 Orifice Number: _[)=-.--,.,,::.,s_____ 

METER VOLUME Units 

.Rnal 'ff! 

Inital ff! 

meter Tempera.tura 

INLET ' . 

Initial :OF 

Final OF 

OUTLET 

Initial OF 

Final of 

Time seo 

Meter ll.H In.~O: 

Barometrio Pressure In. Hg 

Room Temperature 

Initial of 

Finar OF 

Pump Vacuum In. Hg' 

, 

. , 

Run Number 

1 

0'1. q,~ <; 

9/90 0 

lje) 

/1 <6 

, 

&3 '. '" &4 

4Jo 

,J,9­

3:) .­ j0 

.i-I 

'tl 

V?­

2 

lO3.,0l'd. 

'11 ..5"cD 

(., y, 

--;}{) 

It!4 

.tJlI1 

if J 0 

;).:;J 

·3D f IO 

":1-1 

~. 

I '--::z 

I , 

! " 


COMPREHENSIVE' 

EWSSION 

SERVICES. 

/ ; 

.. 


I 
ORIFICE BRACKETING 

Operator Daniel Boes BRACKET ORIFlCES: 


Date May 14, 2004 Orifice No. 1 23 


! 

1. K Factor 0.6274 

;Jieter Number 5 Orifice NO.2 12 

Meter Y Factor 1.014 K Factor 0.3336 

ORIFICE #1 ORIFICE #2 

Meter Volume ! 


Final Cubic Feet 108.768 113.891 


Initia! Cubic Feet 103.100 108.800 


Net Cubic Feet 5.668 5.091 


Meter Temperature 

Inlet 

Initial Deg. F 72.0 72.0 

Final Deg.F 72.0 72.0 

Outlet 

Initial Deg.F 71.0 71.0 

Final Deg. F 71.0 72.0 

Avg. Meter Temp Deg. F . 71.5 71.8 

Time sec 420.0 720.0 

Meter Delta 'H inches H2O 2.20 0.62 

Barometric Pressure inches Hg 30.10 30.10 

Room Temperature . ~:.. . 

Initial Deg. F 72.0 73.0 

Final Deg.F 72.0 73.0 

Avg.Room Temperature Deg.F 72.0 73.0 

Pump Vacuum inches Hg 17 17 

Vcr (std) 

Vm (std) 

Y Factor (brackets) 

dscf 

dscf 

5.731 

5.693 

1.007 

5.219 

5.091 

1.025 

+/- 2% Criteria 

PercentofY 

P,Ll.$S 

0.71 

PASS 

1.10 

), 
-- ----

BRACKETING WORK SHEET 


operat~r: UCM\'\J fIDes Meter f.D. _S_...:..._______

Date: 5·(4'- 0 if K Factor No.1 ;) .fpC< 3Y 

Previous Y Factor r 0 I rj K Factor No.2 O. 333b 

METER VOLUME ' Units 1 :2

ft3 Final J 0 'l?, --=i-u~ h.1" ~91 ftll Initial \() 3. \ C"'D 10 ~:gao 

Meter Temp.erature 

INLET 

OF Initial td. -=t-'d 

OF final -=j-;), '~:J 

OUTLET 

.'.. InItial' OF 1-\ -=t(

Final OF -=f-f '~

Time· sec Lt~D .-.::t';;Z 

Meter .6.H In. HIP d·d . f..g cl. .. ~ , 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 0CSLO '30 .\0

Room Temperatura 

OF Initial +~ 4-3 

Anal OF -:t-J "9'"\ 

Pump Vacuum In. Hg \ -:::j.. '1-'::;'"

=..c­

- - CO:MPREHENSIVE -

= E=-- -- -­ -- -

-- EM1SSION 

-- S .SERVICES, -=­

.... 


. .... ~ ....
Appendix E 


Post-test Calibrations 

METER CALIBRATION 

Operator Matt Milligan KFactor 0.6274 


Date May 27,2004 Meter Number 5 


l Previous Y Factor 1.014 Orifice Number 23 


RUN 1 RUN2 

Meter Volume 


Final Cubic Feet 336.958 342.640 


Initial Cubic Feet 331.300 337.000 


Net Cubic Feet 5.658 5.640 

Meter Temperature 

Inlet 

Initial Oeg.F 74.0 75.0 

Final Oeg.F 76.0 76.0 

Outlet 

Initial Oeg. F 73.0 74.0 

Final Oeg.F 74.0 74.0 

Avg. Meter Temp Deg.F 74.3 74.8 

Time sec 420.0 420.0 


Meter Delta H inches H2O 2.20 2.20 


Barometric Pressure inches Hg 29.64 29.64 


: Room Temperature .:. j Initial Deg.F 75.0 76.0 


Final Deg. F 76.0 76.0 . 


Avg.Room Temperature Deg.F 75.5 76.0 


Pump Vacuum inches Hg 17 17· 

Vcr (std) dscf 5.625 5.623 


Vm {std} dscf 5.567 5.545 


Y Factor 1.010 1.014 


Delta H@ 1.933 1.947 


AverageY 1.012 


,L\verage Delta H@ 1.940 


+/- 2% Criteria 


Percent of Avg Y 0.18 


PASS 


+/- 5% Criteria 


Percent of Final Y 0.18 


PASS 

CONSOLE WORK SHEET 

,,'I', Operator: !lkt.t!: /til!l7411 K Factor: __' (_~~/?--=-1-L'(___ 

Date: 5-OJ 1-0 <{ Meter I.D. 5 


Previous Y Factor. l 0 / V Orifice Number: _____~"'--&;;..]____ 


METER VOLUME Units 

'FInal 'ftS 

'. Inltal ff 

Meter Temperature 

INLET 

Initial "F 

Final " 

OF 

OUTLET 

Initial "F 

Final OF 

Tlma sac 

Meter AH In.Hp: 

Barometrio Pressure in. Hg 

Room Temperature 

InitIal OF 

Final "F 

Pump Vacuum In. Hg' 

Run NUmber 

1 

':3~- 95~ 

33/·300' ' , 

rtf 

f/.p 

73 

1-i.( 

1.(2.0 

~,;;;, 

;21,(; t.( 

'1-5 c -r(:;' (1- . 

2 

3 til.· ft;¥O, 

33 r1'(}OD 

7-5 

-=;-r,a 

'7-'1 

rtf 

L/Za 

r?;:; 

;) 9·6t/ v I 

-=t(P

r& 

I 7­

':"C ­ CO:M:PREIIE.NSIVE' =E EMISSION 

==- S ~ SERVICES. 

i , 
ORIFICE BRACKETING 

Operator Matt Milligan BRACKET ORIFICES: 

Date May 27,2004 Orifice No.1 23 

K Factor 0.6274 

I~eter Number 5 Orifice No.2 12 

Meter Y Factor 1.012 K Factor 0.4041 

ORIFICE #1 ORIFICE #2 

Meter Volume 

Final Cubic Feet 369.958 375.337 

Initial Cubic Feet 364.300 370.000 

Net Cubic Feet 5.658 5.337 

Meter Temperature 

Inlet 

Initial Oe9. F 77.0 77.0 

Final Oeg.F 77.0 77.0 

Outlet 

Initial De9. F 77.0 77.0 

Fina! Oeg;F 77.0 77.0 

Avg. Meter Temp Oeg.F 77.0 77.0 

Time sec 420.0 600.0 

Meter Delta H inches H2O 2.20 1.00 

Barometric Pressure inches Hg 29.64 29.64 

~oom Temperature 

Initial De9. F· 77.0 77.0 

Final Oe9. F 77.0 77.0 

Avg.Room Temperature 06g. F 77.0 77.0 

Pump Vacuum inches Hg 17 20 

Vcr (std) dscf 5.617 5.169 

Vm (std) dscf 5.539 5.209 

Y Factor (brackets) 1.014 0.~92 

+/- 2% Criteria 

Percent ofY 0.21 1.96 

PASS PASS 
- -

- -

-- -

BRACKETING WORK SHEET 


Meter I.D. __">.:;;...- ______ Operator: }jalf 1tt'llif6 i1 


Date: 5'-;;n.-0 l( K Factor No.1 __-.:;....1_~;.....;;;;:;_-:::;::...__.;L( __ 


Previous Y Factor f· D tl..- K Factor No.2 ---,---:;..l....t.tf_o_l/.!....!..-f___ 


·1 

i 

! 

METER VOLUME 

Final 

Initial 

. Units 

tea 

ff" 

, 

3tc.CJ.CJ56 

J&t/3IJ(J 

2 

'3T5.33r-. 

3TOIODO 

Meter Temp'eratljre 

INLET 

Initial 

F.inal 

of 

OF 

7-7­

rr­::;.~ 

i-~

OUTLET 

Initial 

Final 

OF 

OF 

??­

rr 

1-t7-1­

Time ,­

Meter llH 

Barometric Pressure 

see 

in. HzO 

in. Hg 

tJZD 

/;?;;? 

;;?9. &y 

t/:;tJO 

1.0 

.. (01( 

Room Temperature 

Initial 

Final 

Pump Vacuum 

of 

of 

In. Hg ... 

'97­

1-r 

/-::;­

1--::r 

7-7­

odD 

:.c - -­ - - COMPREHENSIVE -E­ ====- -:::::=:: EMISSION 

-

= s-=­ -- - SERVICES. 

). 

AppendixF 


Process Data 

_______________________ _ 

Compliance Emission Test 


Operating Data 


Owner: Cargill Cedar Rapids West Date: May 26, 2004 

Source: EP 95 Soybean Storage Tank C-I0 Permit #:,...;:44...:.;9;.;;2~·_____ 

Maximum Continuous Process Rate (Manufacturers Rating)_36_0_t_o_nlhr ____________ 


HistoricalAverage Process Rate:.;...360~t..:..onlhr 

Historical Maximum Process Rate...:.3-'-60 ......t ...... o....;nJ_hr ___________________

Types and Sources ( if any) of Fuels normally Bumed._N_/A_______________ 

Type of Fuel Burned During this test....... N...... /A ____________________

If Fuel is used Approximate Quantities of each listed above burned Annually...... N;;.;;/A ___________

Recycling Capability Yes.___ No X 

Recycling in Progress Yes___ No X 

fmcess Data D~! jOg RYIl§ 

Process Rate 

(gallhr, Iblhr, tonslhr. etc .•. ) 

Process Rate Wet 

Percent Moisture ("!o) 

Process Rate Dry 

How Process Rate was 

Oetermined 

Run 1 Run2w Run 3 

. 

276 tonlhr 160 tonlhr 107 ton!hr 

Monitored truck loads 

Person Responsjbl~ for Data,.:.P..:;.au1:::.:.K;;.,;e,;;:;rr...;:&.:.,;Am:.=:.;.:eI:::;ia;:...;D;:....e:=D=D1=·D:!2,g_____---_______ 

Signmum_____________________________________________________________ 

ntle/PositionFacility Superintendent & Crush Department Superintendent 

** please incih;8te in the sawe unit$. as vour hjstom:a1 iaff2IJ1Ji1Von 
--

____________________________________ __ 

',; 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUlPl\1ENT OPERATING DATA 

Plant Cargill Cedar Rapids West Loc:ttion 1110 12th Avenue SW, Cedar Rapids, IA 

Source Type Dust Collector , I Partlcu1ate Rated Produc;tion 360 tonlhr 

Date May 26,2004 Tune ____ ~Proouamn~·1~8~1~~-nlhr~--------

Air Flow Data .:,10.:,.1:...;7-=d::.sc.:..:fin:;;;;:....______ RunNo. _1... ,2.....,_&_3__________ 

MecbaniCll Collector: 


Tube Dia ____in.. Number of Tubes Design 6p ____i,n. HiO Gas Temp --,-__Of 


Observed 6p in HozO Design cfmJtube @ ObseIVed 6.p @ orFan Rated H.P. Operating Volts Operating Amps _' _____ 

- FicldNo. Frim.aIy Primary Secondary SecondaIy SpnrkRme 

Voltage (volts) Current (amps) Voltage (KV) Current (rna) (per min) 

Scrubber: 


Type _~________ ~p(across scrubber} __________ in B.O. 


Fan Rated HP Operating Volts ______ Opernting Amps ______ 

Liquid Circ:'ulaIion Rate gal/min. % Make-up ____ Blowdown ______gpm 

Scrubbing Water Change InteIVal ___________-­____________ 

Settling Tank Cleaning Interval 

Baghouse: 


Pressu:re·Positive __----,,...-;-__ Negative _X_____ No. Compartments _o_ne__~_ 

Type: Cle:ming _c_om_p....I'_es_s_ed_a_ir________ CIe:m Cycle ·_1.;.....5__________'min 


Avg. Baghouse 6,p__________in HlO .o.p Range 


Fan: Rated ID. 2 Ope:acng Volts 460 OperntiDg Amps _3_.7_____ 


Cyclone: 


T~e __~~______________ t.p __-:-___ inH'lO 
 Diameter ___------­ Fan RncedEP _________ Opernting Volts _____ Operating Amps -----rPerson Responsible for Data Paul Kerr & Amelia Denning 

Sj~rure 

Title:Position Facility Superintendent & Crush Department Superintendent 

10 
Appendix G 


Opacity Certification 

AEROMETENGINEERING INC. 


Certification ofVisible Opacity 


Reading 


Jay Titus 


, On April 13, 2004, qualified to conduct EPA Method 9 Tests for visible opacity in 

accordance with the rnethods established for such qualification in 40 CFR Part 60 

AppendixA. 

Date: 04113104 Signature: ~~,-", Instructor, Aeromet Engineering 

Certificate expires: 10113/04