alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2765 

To suspend temporarily the duty on copoly(dimethyl carbonate/1,6- 

hexanediol). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on copoly(dimethyl 

carbonate/1,6-hexanediol). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COPOLY(DIMETHYL CARBONATE/1,6- 

4 HEXANEDIOL). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Copoly(dimethyl carbonate/ 

1,6-hexanediol) (CAS No. 

101325–00–2) (provided for 

in subheading 3907.99.01) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2765 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Stephen E. Anbinder, certify that: l.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of The National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports); 2.          Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.          Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; and 4.          Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement included as an exhibit to this annual report, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement.      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee

Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency


Date: September 27, 2005/s/ Stephen E. AnbinderStephen E. AnbinderPresidentNational Collegiate Funding LLC
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-10146

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

WASEEM DAKER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

PATRICK HEAD, et al., 

Defendants,

BRIAN OWENS, 

RICK JACOBS, 

ROBERT TOOLE, 

MR. DELOACH, 

FNU, 

USCA11 Case: 23-10146 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 08/12/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-10146

BETTY BAILEY-DEAN, 

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cv-00047-RSB-BWC

____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Waseem Daker, a Georgia prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals 

from a magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for leave to file 

a motion to vacate the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his case with prejudice. The magistrate judge’s order is not a 

final and appealable order because the order had not been rendered 

final by the district court when Daker filed the notice of appeal. See 

Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 1066-67 (11th Cir. 

1982); United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009). 

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review that order. 

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for 

rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other 

requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 23-10146 Document: 30-1 Date Filed: 08/12/2024 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17213-17214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-930-1430-ET; NVN-83210; 9-08807; TAS:14x1109]


Public Land Order No. 7731; Withdrawal of Public Lands for Gold 
Point and Ione Townsites; Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order No. 7731, Withdrawal of Public Lands for Gold 
Point and Ione Townsites; Nevada.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order withdraws approximately 672 acres of public lands 
from location and entry under the United States mining laws for a 
period of 5 years to protect historic and cultural resources within the 
Gold Point and Ione Townsites pending special legislation that would 
resolve land ownership conflicts.

DATES: Effective Date: April 10, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Gratton, Bureau of Land 
Management, Nevada State Office, P.O. Box 12000, 1340 Financial 
Boulevard, Reno, Nevada 89520, 775-861-6532.

[[Page 17214]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The withdrawal will preserve the historic 
and cultural resources within the towns of Gold Point and Ione in aid 
of legislation.

Order

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (2000), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the following described public 
lands are hereby withdrawn from settlement, sale, location, or entry 
under the United States mining laws:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 7 S., R. 41\1/2\ E.,
    Sec. 3, SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, N\1/2\NE\1/4\SW\1/4\, SW\1/4\NE\1/
4\SW\1/4\, W\1/2\SW\1/4\, W\1/2\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\, SE\1/4\SE\1/4\SW\1/
4\, and SW\1/4\SW\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 10, N\1/2\NW\1/4\NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, N\1/2\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\NW\1/
4\, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\NW\1/4\, and N\1/2\NW\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    The area described contains 230 acres in Esmeralda County.

T. 13 N., R. 39 E.,
    Sec. 32, E\1/2\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 33, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\ and S\1/2\;
    Sec. 34, lots 9 to 26, inclusive, and S\1/2\NW\1/4\.

    The area described contains 442.02 acres in Nye County.

    2. The withdrawal made by this order does not alter the 
applicability of those public land laws governing the use of lands 
under lease, license, or permit or governing the disposal of their 
mineral or vegetative resources other than under the mining laws.
    3. This withdrawal will expire 5 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (2000), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: April 10, 2009.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. E9-8604 Filed 4-10-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,145,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,616,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,250,458
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,261,956
<PP&E>                                      67,675,828
<DEPRECIATION>                            (11,934,551)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,003,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,861,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        736
<COMMON>                                       974,679
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,041,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,003,233
<SALES>                                      6,094,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,478,728
<CGS>                                       10,829,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,695,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               951,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,098,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,998,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,801,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,197,651)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,197,651)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
____________ No. 95-3421

____________ At Xayasounethone, * * Petitioner, * * v. * * Petition for Review of an Immigration and Naturalization * Order of the Immigration Service, Carl R. Houseman, * & Naturalization Service District Director, I.N.S., * Janet Reno, Attorney General of * [UNPUBLISHED] the United States of America, * * Respondents. *

____________ Submitted: February 12, 1996 Filed: August 12, 1996

____________ Before McMILLIAN, LAY and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

____________
PER CURIAM.

At Xayasounethone (petitioner) seeks review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from a deport ation order entered by an immigration judge (IJ) (hereinafter "I J order"). In re At Xa yasounethone , No. A25 020 334 (B.I.A. Aug. 17, 1995) (order dismissing appeal) (hereinafter "BIA order"). The sole issue raise d by thi s petition for review is whether the BIA erred in holding tha t petitioner's conviction under Minnesota state law for assault in the secon d degree constitutes a firearms offense within the meaning of § 241(a)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(C).In K ao Vue v. INS , No. 95-3421, slip op. at 6 (8th Cir. Aug. 12 ,

1996), we held that, in order for an offense to come within the meaning of § 1251(a) (2)(C), the use, etc., of a weapon must be an element of th e off ense of conviction and the weapon in question must be a firearm o r destructiv e device. Whether the latter requirement has been met is a determination which the immigration judge may ma ke by reviewing the record of conviction. Slip op. at 7. However, the information in the record of conviction demonstrating that a firearm or destructive device was used mus t not be mere surplusage. Id. at 9.

In the present case, the criminal offense for which petitioner was convicted has as an essential element the use of a "dangerous weapon." Se e Minn. Stat. Ann. § 609.222 (West 1993) (assault in the second degree). Th e IJ r eviewed the criminal complaint as part of petitioner's record o f convict ion. IJ order at 5. Based upon that document, the IJ conclude d that petitioner did in fact use a firearm in the commission of his offense
. Id. Moreover, because the information regarding petitioner's use of a firear mdemonstrated that an element of petitioner's offense had bee n satisfied, it was not mere surplusage.
Therefore, upon careful de novo review, we hold that the BIA did not err in determining that petitioner is deportable pursuant to 8 U.S.C
. § 1251(a)(2)(C). The order of the BIA is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00259

- CR

EX PARTE Juan Gabriel Colorado CARRILLO,

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10367CR

Honorable Roland Andrade , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant has filed a motion for a 30

- day extension of time to file his appellant’s brief.

We grant in part the motion and order appellant’s brief filed by July 11, 2022

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of June, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cardero Resource Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Ross McDonald, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/G. Ross McDonald

G. Ross McDonald
  Chief Financial Officer





Date:  April 26, 2005
---

Exhibit 4.9

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTdated for reference the 1st day of August, 2010 (the Amendment). BETWEEN:HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP.(the Company)AND:HEMAN CHAO(the Executive)
  WHEREAS:A.
     the parties entered into an employment agreement dated for reference August 6, 2008, which was amended October 1st, 2009 (as so amended, the Employment Agreement);B.
     the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement upon the terms set out in this Amendment;
 **THEREFORE**in consideration of the recitals, the following covenants and the payment of one dollar made by each party to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by each party, the parties agree on the following terms: 1.
     The amendments set out in the Amendment are effective on and after August 1, 2010.2.
     All other provisions of the Employment Agreement as amended shall remain in full force and effect, except that where this Amendment may be in conflict with the provisions of the Employment Agreement, then this Amendment shall govern.3.
     Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:
  3.1 Annual Base Salary The Company shall pay or provide to the Executive, for his services under this Agreement, an annual salary of $275,000, payable semi-monthly on the fifteenth and the second last banking day of the month. Should the fifteenth day of any month not be a business day, the base salary otherwise due on such date shall be paid to the Executive on the immediately preceding business day. INWITNESSWHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. Per:/s/ Donald H. Segal
Authorized Signatory/s/ Heman ChaoHEMAN CHAO


---
Exhibit 13.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: June 23, 2009
    
    /s/ STANISLAV A. PLOSCHENKO

Stanislav A. PloschenkoSenior Vice President  Finance
 1
Edward BRONNER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0244

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 06, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I,Ricardo Bernardes, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 27, 2005
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**ChiefAccounting Officer**

 

I, Barry Golko, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Analytical Surveys, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

**5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):**

** **

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 

Dated:    February 14,2006

 
| /s/ Barry Golko |   |
|-----------------|--------|

Barry Golko

ChiefAccounting Officer

 

----
---

Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Annual Report of PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/
      Richard W. McCullough
            
            October
      23, 2009Richard
      W. McCulloughChief
      Executive OfficerPetroleum
      Development CorporationManaging
      General Partner/s/
      Gysle R. Shellum
            
            October
      23, 2009Gysle
      R. ShellumChief
      Financial OfficerPetroleum
      Development CorporationManaging
      General Partner


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.