P. 1 

# OAR Box 1669 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# fjrf) U-EA9 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/23/20089:36:49AM

Sheet 87 of 110l_ l P. 2

MEMORANDU

M TO : Marth aSmit h U.S . EPA/OAQPS/ESD/WCPG ES D Project

No . 96/0 5 FROM : Gre g LaFla

man d BerndHanek

e s&Cl&C Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) DATE : Octobe

r 20,199 9 P:\n83 1 SUBJECT : Octobe

r 5,199 9 Fourt

h Roundtabl e Meeting fo

r th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) (OLD ) MACT Rul e I . Purpos e Th e purpos e of

thi s meeting wa s to brin g together th e stakeholder s fo

r th e OL D project , includin g th e U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency (EPA) an dit s contractor , t

o discus s th e analysi s o f

surve y data , MAC

T floors , an

dpreliminar

y rul e provision s andimpacts . Thi s wor k i s i n suppor

t of th e developmen

t o f nationa l emissio n standard s fo

r hazardou s ai

r pollutant s (NESHAP) fo

r th e OL D sourc e category . II . Locatio n an

d Dat e U.S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agency Environmenta

l Research Cente

r (ERC) , Classroo m# 1 Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a Octobe r 5,1999,9:0 0 a

mto 2:3 0 p m III . Participants In perso n Bil l Beck , Mobi l Oil LauraBurrell , Chemica

l Manufacturers Associatio n Davi d Darling , Nationa

l Pain t an dCoating s Associatio n Bern d Haneke , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Ken t C . Hustvedt , EP

A Pau l Jann , Dupon

t Gre g LaFlam , PE S TaraLanier , Ashland Chemica l Compan y Rober t Matejka , Akz o Nobel Coating s Jack McClure , Shell Chemica

l Ush aMehra , GAT

X Terminal sP. 3

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtabl e Octobe r 20 , 199 9 Pag e 2 Denis e Michelson , ARC O Nor mMorrow , Exxon Chemica l Liane Piatt , Do

w Chemica

l Kari n Ritter , America

n Petroleu mInstitut e Marth aSmith , EP

A Larr y Sorrels , EP

A Ha l Taback , Ha

l Tabac k Compan y Do n Wang , Union Carbid

e Gar y Wilson , Maratho n Oi

l Compan y Rick Wright , Ashland Chemica

l Compan y Phone-i n Jorda n Jacobsen , Alyesk

aPipeline Servic e Compan

y Davi d Mazzocco , PPG Jacki e Surles , Louisian aDEQ Ja n Werner , Marathon AshlandPetroleu m Th e complet e projec t stakeholde

r list , indicatin g which member s attende dth e meeting , i s include d a s Attachmen

t 1 to thi s memorandum . The EPA' s presentatio n on th e statu s o f th e rul e proposa

l i s Attachmen

t 2 , an d th e EPA' s economic s presentatio n i s Attachmen t 3 . IV . Summar

y o f Discussio n Th e principa

l discussio n topic s a

t th e meeting ar

e summarizedbelow . Pag e number s refe r to th e pag e i n th e EPA' s presentatio n on th e rul e statu s (Attachmen t 2) . Actio n item s agree d to b y th e stakeholder s an d th e EP A ar e liste dseparatel

y following th e summary . 1 . Surve y Coverage/Scop e of

Industr y Al l majo r sourc e refinerie s wit

h OL D operation s shoul dhav e been caugh t in th e survey ; th e segmen

t respondin g (p . 6 ) i s shown b y th e EP A a s onl y 3 0 percent . Usin g tha

t assumption , baselin e emission s and impact s ma y b e overstate d(Mobil/API) . The EPA' s estimat

e of th e numbe

r o f majo r sourc e chemica

l productio n facilitie s (p . 6 ) ma y b e base d o n a

n outdate d referenc e source . A n update dlistin g of

th e source s subjec t

to th e HO N i s bein g prepare d by industr y an dshoul db e release di

n 4 to 6 week s (CMA , Dupont , Exxon Chemical) . Wha t type s o f facilitie s ar

e include din th e ter

m"for-hire " terminal s (p . 6 ) (Taback Company) ? EPA : Normally thos e non-collocate dterminal s handlin g liquid s owne db y others . Attendee s stresse d tha

t th e lin e betwee

n for-hir e andothe r terminal s i s blurred , wit

h chemica lP. 4

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtable Octobe r 20 , 1999 Pag e 3 companie s leasin g ou

t storag e spac e a

t thei r ow n stand-alone terminals , etc . (Shell Chemical , Exxon Chemical , Dupont) . EPA : Th e label s use

do n th e tabl e ar

e fo r convenience , an

dar e no t expecte d to b e used in the rule . 2 . Regulator

y Cutoff s Doe s th e 5 percen

t HA P cutof f definin g organi c liquid s (p . 15 ) appl y t o th e entir e liqui d (example , coating s tha

t have bot h liqui dan dsoli dcomponents ) o

r jus t t o the volatil e fraction (PPG) ? EPA : Cutof

f applie s t o the entir e liquid . Wher e di d th e 5 percen

t cutof f com e fro m(API) ? Thi s cutof

f seem s to o low ; a1 0 percen t valu e i s used in th e benzene rule s (GATX) . EPA : It i s aworking numbe

r tha t ha s bee n used in othe

r rules , notabl

y th e HON . W

e ar e stil l analyzing whethe

r i t i s th e mos t

appropriat

e value . For-hir

e termina l facilitie s will not

b e abl e t o determine HA

P percentage s i

n th e liquid s they handle , becaus e precis e dat aar e no t typically provide dto the

mby client s (GATX) . EPA : Would it b e feasible fo

r facilitie s t o requir e mor e exact datafro mthe liqui downers ? No , thi s would no t b e practica

l (GATX) . W e sugges t tha t all applicabilit

y cutoff s (tan k size , vapo r pressure , an

dliqui d throughput) b e place d i

n th e Applicabilit

y section of

th e rul e (API) . EPA : Th

e EP A i s requestin g input

t o aid i n th e developmen

t o f reasonabl e cutoffs , an

dwill attempt

t o consolidat

e cutoff s to mak e th e rul e easie

r t o understand . 3 . Tabl e of

Affecte d HA P Wha t wa s th e sourc e of

the vapo r pressur e datausedt

o creat e th e HA P tabl e (p . 17-19) ? Wh y wa s 2 5 degree s C used a s the basis ; thi s seems high i n relatio n t

o actua l liqui d temperature s an

d affect s which HA

P ar e placedon th e list . Perhap s 2 0 degree s C wouldb e a mor e appropriat

e choic e (Mobil/API) . EPA : A n EP A contractor

(RTI ) collecte dan

dsupplie d thes e data , usin g 25 degree s C a s the basis . W e will review th e basi s fo

r thi s choice . Which glyco l ether s ar

e supposedt

o b e includedon th e table , an dwhich ar e exclude d (p . 18 ) (Akz o Nobel Coatings) ? EPA : Specific glyco l ether s mean t t o b e on thi s tabl e will b e specifically liste d whe

n th e tabl e i s published . 4 . Storage Tank s Stakeholder s addresse d severa l tan k issues , mainl

y dealing wit

h exclusions , complianc e time , etc . Thes e ar

e covered unde

r item s 9 an

d1 0 on exclusion s an

dothe r rul e provisions .P. 5

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtable Octobe r 20 , 199 9 Pag e 4 The costin g methodology fo r storag e tan

k contro l installatio n (floating roofs ) ma y underestimat

e th e actua l costs , due t

o certai n item s tha

t th e EP A disregard s i

n it s assumptions , such a s sitin g fo

r th e tank , etc . (Dupont) . 5 . Loadin g Racks/Cargo Tank s Shouldn' t th e 2 0 ppm

v alternat e emissio n limit

(p . 11,20 ) b e applicabl e to non combustio n typ e devices , a s i s provide din som e othe r rule s (Dupont) ? EPA : W

e ar e no t awar e of an y demonstratio n o

f thi s being a

n appropriat

e alternativ e fo

r non-combustio n contro l devices . EPA : Doe s industr

y prefe r afacility-wid

e o r aper-rack throughput

cutof f fo r applicability ? Consensu s apparentl y wa s tha t eac h rac k shoul dhav e acutoff

, t o allo w owner s t o designat e atyp e of servic e fo r arac k an donl y contro l thos e meetin g th e OL D criteria . Wha t tes t method s would b e specifiedfo r th e annua l carg o tan k vapor tightnes s certification ? Attendee s expressed apreferenc e fo r havin g achoic e between EP A Metho d 2 7 an d th e present

DOT test s affectin

g chemica l tan k truck s (Exxon Chemical , Dow Chemical , NTTC followin g meeting) . EPA : Metho d2 7 wouldappl y t o tan k truck s equippe dwit

h avapor collectio n system ; othe

r truck s will probabl

y b e allowedto continu e usin g th e DOT methods . 6 . Containers Emission s fromcontaine

r filling ar e ver y lo w pe r th e EPA' s estimat

e (NPCA) . The submerge d fil

l approach coul d lea

d to increase demission s in man y case s du e t

o liqui dclingin g to th e fil l tub e whe n i t i s removed fromth e container . Also , cleanin g thes e tube s coul dproduc e hazardou s wast

e a t th e facilit y (AshlandChemical , Exxon Chemical) . The loade r woul dhav e t o absor b th e contro l costs ; th e EP

A shoul dloo

k seriousl y a t whethe r thes e control s woul d produc e abenefit

(Akz o Nobel Coatings) . Ther e ar e no t man y drum s tha

t ar e exactl y 5 5 gallons ; the

y var y in siz e abov e and belo w thi s size . The EP

A shoul d no t

regulat e nomina l 55-gallon drum s (Akz o Nobel Coatings) . Ther e ar e man y low-volume , intermitten

t dru mfilling s tha

t occu r a t liqui dhandlin g facilities . A low-volum

e throughput

applicabilit

y cutof f i s needed . Specia

l purpos e filling s (example , spil l response , samples , maintenance ) shoul dals o b e exclude d(Exxon Chemical , Dow Chemical , Dupont , Shell Chemical) . 7 . EquipmentComponent s The estimate d cost s an

d baseline emission s fo

r equipmen t component s appea

r to b e ver y



### • VP. 6

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtable Octobe r 20 , 199 9 Pag e 5 high . EPA : Ther

e ar e tw o potentia

l reasons : som

e reporte dequipmen

t count s appeare dto b e to o high du e t

o possibl e misinterpretatio n b y surve y respondents , an

demissio n factor s derive d fo r SOCM I operation s wer

e used t o calculat e th e baseline emission s an demissio n reductions . Th e CM A offere d t o assis t i n contacting individua

l facilitie s wit

h extremel y high counts . I

n respons e t o aquestion , the EP

A statedtha

t acombinatio n o

f with-LDA

R(controlled) an

dno LDA R(uncontrolled) emission factors wer e usedin calculatin g the baseline . Th e EP A shoul d us e th e lowe

r marketing facilit

y emission factors , previously acceptedb y th e EP A fo r gasolin e marketin g facilities , fo

r simila r facilitie s unde

r consideratio n i

n th e OL D categor y (Marathon) . EPA : D o thes e factor s appl y onl y t o gasoline handlin g equipment ? Thes e factor s ar e no t necessarily restricte d t

o gasoline equipmen

t (Mobil/API) . Som e equipmen

t component s a

t terminal s ar

e in intermitten

t use , s o baseline emission s (p . 8 ) ma y b e lowe r tha n th e EP A estimated(GATX) . EPA : I s thi s equipmen t purge dof HA P between uses ? Th e answe

r to thi s questio n wa s unclear . Wha t specifi c dat

ashould industr

y submi t t o demonstrat

e tha t avisua l inspectio n progra mwould b e a s effective i

n detecting leaks fromequipmen t a s a n instrument-base d LDA

R progra m(GATX) ? GAT

X could collec t

dat afo r terminal s in Texas ; th e '93-9 4 datashoul d reflect th e lea k rat e existin g prior

t o adoption of

instrumen t LDA Rby th e State . EPA : Thes e datawil l b e usefu

l in comparing th e effectivenes s of th e tw o contro l approaches . 8 . Applicability/Covere d Operations Th e rul e shoul d provide aseparat e subcategor

y an drequirement s fo

r th e for-hir

e termina l industr y segment , a

t leas t i n term s o f control s fo

r equipmen t component s (GATX) . Wha t wil l b e th e rul e criteri adefining amajo r source ? Th

e EP A surve y useda n actua l emission s cutof

f o f 5/12. 5 ton s pe

r year , whil e th e usua

l measur e i n MACT rule s i s apotentia l to emit (PTE ) of 10/25 ton s pe

r year . Th e us e of the PT E approach wouldlea

dto coverag e of man y mor e for-hir e terminal s due to the flexibilit y tha t thes e facilitie s needi

n thei r operations . W e prefe r th e us e of a n actua l emission s cutoff

, simila r t o th e Marine Loading MACT rul e (GATX) . The EPA' s transitio n policy o n PT E coul db e referencedin th e Applicabilit y sectio n if th e actua l emission s approach wer

e selected(Mobil/API) . EPA : N o forma l decisio n o n thi s issu e ha s been made . EPA : If a n owne r i s leasing spac e t

o othe r companie s on it s plant

site , shoul dall HA

P emission s b e aggregate d t

o determine the majo

r sourc e status ? W

e hav e such aleasin g arrangemen

t a t one o f ou r facilitie s (AshlandChemical) . Se e th e Marine Loading MACT rul e fo r atreatmen

t of multi-owne

r site s (Dow Chemical) .



# _ rP. 7

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtabl e Octobe r 20 , 199 9 Pag e 6 9 . Suggeste d Exclusion s Include arul e exclusio n fo

r on-sit e transfer s an

dtransfe r o f wast e liquids . Or , include a n exclusio n fo

r RCRA-covered wastes . Conside r th e RCR A definition of

wast e (Exxo n Chemical) . Exclude Research an

d Developmen

t (R&D ) activitie s fromcoverage . Thes e division s sometime s us e marke

t developmen

t tank s in evaluatin g new product s (Do w Chemical) . Exclude pressur

e vessel storag e (C 4 an

dlighte r products , ma

y hav e emergenc y releases ) (Exxo n Chemical) . Th e EP A agreed tha

t thes e suggestion s ma

y b e valid , an

dsaidthey woul dconside

r the m in drafting th e propose d rule . 10 . Othe r Suggested Rul e Provisions The ne w generi c (G- ) MAC T subpart s ar

e preferabl e generall

y t o th e HO N fo r simila r emissio n source s du e to th e burden reductio n resultin g fromimprovedadministrativ e requirement s in thes e new subparts . Alternatively , w e wouldlik e t o hav e th e optio n of choosin g eithe

r th e HO N or th e G-MAC

T provisions . Th

e tan k Leve l 2 requirement s and subpart s T T an d U U fo r fugitive s wer

e cite da s specifi c improvement s (Shel l Chemical , Exxon Chemical , Dow Chemical) . EPA : I s ther e adownsid

e to referencing existin g rul e provisions ? Attendee s responde d tha

t th e Genera

l Provision s ar

e differen t amon g rule s tha t ar e in differen

t part s o f th e CF R(i.e. , part s 60 , 61 , an

d63) . A low-throughput

applicabilit

y cutof f i s neededfo

r th e containe

r filling provision s in th e rul e (Exxo n Chemical) . For storag e tank s wit

h variabl e use , apredominan t us e provisio n i s needed , s o tha t occasiona l or one-tim e use s o f atan k fo r organi c liquid s doe s no t

trigge r applicabilit

y (Exxo n Chemical) . Also , wit

h th e MTB E phaseout

man y tank s will b e changing their servic e to lowe

r HA P conten t liquids . Th

e EP A shoul dchec

k recen t MAC T rule s (example , Pharmaceuticals ) tha t dea l wit h flexibl e operatio n (ARCO) . Allo w th e longe

r complianc e period s to perfor mtan k conversion s (example , 1 0 years) , a s in man y othe r rules , to avoi d th e cleaning/degassin g emission s tha t ma y excee dth e emissio n reduction s fromth e control s (Shell Chemical) . Specif y i n th e containe

r filling standard s tha

t they appl y to th e drumming of

products, t

o eliminat e an y confusion ove

r th e treatmen

t of wast e (Exxon Chemical) .

_ . _2 .P. 8

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtable Octobe r 20 , 199 9 Pag e 7 11 . Miscellaneou s Organic NESHA P (MON ) Rule Coordinatio n Clarif y th e curren

t statu s of the coordinatio n of

th e OL D rul e wit h th e MO N (NPCA) . EPA : The approach will b e fo r th e MO N t o cove r all OLD-typ e emissio n source s a t MO N facilitie s usin g th e sam

e emissio n standard s a s ar

e i n th e OL D MACT . Thi s will primarily com e int o pla y wit h regar d t o certain storag e tank s an

di n produc t loadout , wher

e container s an d carg o tank s ar

e filled wit

h organi c liquid s fo

r distributio n of

f th e plant site . 12 . Economics Presentatio n On e attende e asked Mr . Sorrel s abou t how asmall entit

y i s define dfo r th e economi c analysis . Mr . Sorrel s replied tha t th e Smal l Busines s Administratio n applie s criteri athat , fo r thi s category , would includ e primaril y the numbe

r of employee s in th e paren

t company . 13 . Actio n Items The EP A an d stakeholder s agreedt

o provide information t

o eac h othe r to assis t i n th e rul e developmen

t an d t o answe r questions . Item s tha t th e EP A agreed t o provid e t o stakeholders : 1 . Provide t

o AP I th e complet

e lis t of HA P fromwhich th e HA

P tabl e (p . 17-19 ) wa s derived . Provide th e referenc e fo

r th e table' s vapo

r pressur e datato Mobil/API . 2 . Provide to CM

A alis t of facilitie s tha

t submittedver

y high equipmen

t count s in respons e t

o th e EPA' s 199 8 survey . 3 . Provide GAT

X wit h adetaile d databas e output regardin g equipmen

t lea k rule s i n effec t a t th e SIC cod

e 4 2 facilitie s (primaril

y for-hir e terminals ) tha

t responde dto th e EP

A survey . Item s tha t stakeholder s agreedt

o provid e t o th e EPA : 1 . Lis t of HON-covered majo

r sourc e facilitie s (CMA , Exxon Chemical) . 2 . Datarelate d t

o carg o tan

k testin g method s i

n us e (Exxon Chemical) . 3 . Example s of

exclusion s containedi

n containe r filling rule s (example , transfer s relate dto spill response , etc. ) (Exxon Chemical) . 4 . Listin g of

State/loca l throughpu

t cutoff s i n liqui dtransfe

r regulation s (carg o tan

k andothe r containers ) (Ashlan d Chemical) . 

# 1P. 9

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtabl e Octobe r 20 , 199 9 Pag e 8 5 . Equipmen

t lea k result s fo r Texa s facilitie s unde

r variou s contro l program s (visua l inspections , instrumen

t LDAR ) (GATX) .



# _1P.1 0

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtable Octobe r 20 , 1999 Pag e 9



### Attachmen t 1 - Stakeholder/Attendanc e Lis t



# • 3

## Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) MAC T Stakeholder s Meetin g Octobe r 5,199 9 

## SIGN-IN SHEE T <Pleas e mak e an y necessar y correction s an d chec k of f attendance , o r fill i n you r name , etc . i n a blan k row > Nam e Norma n Morro w Jac k McClur e Bo b Hermanso n Joh n Deg e PaulJan n Affiliatio n

Exxo n Chemica l America s Shel l Chemica l (Americas ) B P Amoc o Grou p Dupon t Dupon t Mailin g Addres s

P.O . Bo x 327 2 Houston , T X 7725 3 P.O . Bo x 432 0 Houston , T X 7721 0 80 1 Warrenvill e Rd . Mai l Cod e 708I C Lisle , IL 6053 2 100 7 Marke t

Street , N251 8 Wilmington , D E 1989 8 100 7 Marke t

Street , (N5448A ) Wilmington , D E 1989 8 Telephone/Fa x Numbe r (281)870-611 2 (281 ) 588-2522-fa x (713)241-399 9 (713 ) 241-249 4 - fax (630 ) 434-624 5 (630 ) 434-623 5 - fax (302 ) 773-090 0 (302 ) 774-136 1 - fax (302 ) 774-804 3 e-mai l Addres s

norman.l . morrow @ exxon.co m jlmcclure @ shellus.co m hermanrw@bp.co m john.a.dege@usa.dupont . co m paul.r.jann@usa.dupont.co m I n Attendanc e 

# • •

•

•

p:\n831\meetings\rndtble\signin2.wp d

## Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) MAC T Stakeholder s Meetin g Octobe r 5,199 9 Nam e To mHmie l Jorda n Jacobse n Kari n Ritte r Laur aBurrel l Joh n Proko p Clif f Harviso n De l Billing s (DHM-11 ) Affiliatio n

BASF Corporatio n Alyesk aPipelin e Servic e Compan y America n Petroleu m Institut e Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n Independen t

Liqui d Terminals Associatio n Nationa l Tan k Truc k Carriers , Inc . U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Mailin g Addres s

300 0 Continenta l Dr . Nort h Mt . Olive , N J 0782 8 183 5 South Braga w Stree t Anchorage , A K

9951 2 122 0 L Street , N.W . Washington , D C 2000 5 130 0 Wilso n Boulevar d Arlington , V A 2220 9 Suit e 650,113 3 15t

h Street , N.W . Washington , D C 2000 5 220 0 Mil l Roa d Alexandria , V A 2231 4 40 0 Seventh Street , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 0 Telephone/Fa x Numbe r (973 ) 426-262 4 (973 ) 426-262 2 - fa

x (907 ) 265-838 4 (907 ) 265-858 6 - fa

x (202 ) 682-847 2 (202)682-8031-fa x (703 ) 741-524 6 (703 ) 741-624 6 - fax (202 ) 659-230 1 (202 ) 466-4166-fa x (703 ) 838-196 0 (703 ) 684-575 3 - fa

x (202 ) 366-448 8 (202 ) 366-870 0 - fa

x e-mai l Addres s hmielt@basf-corp.co m jacobsenje @ alyeska-pipeline.co m ritterk@api.or g Laur aBurrell@cmahq.co m ProkopILTA@aol . co m nttc@juno.co m delmer.billings@rspa.dot . go v I n Attendanc e 

## •

(phone )



### •

•

p:\n819\meetings\mdt_3le _ign__ . wp d

## Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) MAC T Stakeholder s Meetin g Octobe r 5,199 9 Nam e Do n Wan g

Gre g LaFla m Bern d Hanek e Marth aSmit

h Rober t Nola n Lian e Piat t Affiliatio n

Unio n Carbid e

PE S PE S U.S . EP A Exxo n Do w Chemica l Mailin g Addres s

320 0 Kanawh aTurnpik e P.O . Bo x 836 1 S . Charleston , W V 2530 3 500 1 S . Miam i Blvd . P O Bo x 1207 7 RTP , N C 2770 9 500 1 S . Miam i Blvd . P O Bo x 1207 7 RTP , N C 2770 9 Mai l Dro p 1 3 RTP , N C 2771 1 P.O . Bo x 218 0 Houston , T X 7725 2 230 1 N . Brazospor t Blvd. , OC-70 8 Freeport , T X 77541 - 325 7 Telephone/Fa x Numbe r (304 ) 747-492 4 (304 ) 747-368 0 - fax (919)941-033 3 (919 ) 941-0234-fa x (919 ) 941-033 3 (919 ) 941-0234-fa x (919 ) 541-242 1 (919 ) 541-0246-fa x (713 ) 656-720 9 (713 ) 656-6594-fa x (409)238-541 8 (409 ) 238-490 3 - fax e-mai l Addres s

wangdl@ucarb.co m greg.laflam@pes.co m bernd.haneke@pes.co m smith.martha@epa.go v rmnolan@exxon.co m lmplatt@dow.co m I n Attendanc e 

# • •

•

•

•

•

p:\n819\meetings_ndtable\signin2.wp d

## Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) MAC T Stakeholder s Meetin g Octobe r 5,199 9 Nam e Joe l Fazzi o Bil l Bec k Denis e Michelso n Bil l Ruh l Gary Wilso n Larr y Sorrel s Ric k Wrigh t Affiliatio n

Internationa l Mate x Tan k Terminal s Mobi l Corporatio n ARC O EMC O Wheato n DTM , Inc . Maratho n Oi l Co . U.S . EP A Ashlan dChemica l Co . Mailin g Addres s

32 1 St . Charles Ne w Orleans , L A 7013 0 322 5 Gallow s Roa d Room6W10 9 Fairfax , V A 2203 9 33 3 S . Hop e Stree t Lo s Angeles , C A 9007 1 250 1 Constan t Commen t Plac e Louisville , K Y 4029 9 53 9 S . Mai n Stree t Findlay , O H Mai l Dro p 1 5 RTP , N C 2771 1 Telephone/Fa x Numbe r (504)586-830 0 (703 ) 849-624 5 (703 ) 849-629 5 - fax (213)486-066 2 (213 ) 486-2021-fa x

(419)421-366 6 (419)421-4515-fa x (919)541-504 1 (614 ) 790-357 7 (614 ) 790-608 0 - fax e-mai l Addres s

joelfazzio@imtt.co m bill_r_beck @ email.mobil.co m ztcdcm@is.arco . co m bruhl@syltone.co m grwilson @ marathonoil.co m sorrels , larr y @epa . go v rlwright@ashland.co m I n Attendanc e 

## •

•

•

•

•

•

- . p:\n819\meetings\radtable\signin2 . wpd

## Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) MAC T Stakeholder s Meetin g Octobe r 5,199 9 Nam e Ush aMehr a Davi d Darlin g Jacki e Surle s To mJackso n Alic e Crow e

Ja n Werne r Affiliatio n

GAT X Terminal s Corporatio n Nationa l Pain t

an d Coating s Associatio n Louisian aDE Q Equiv aService s LL C America n Petroleu m Institut e Maratho n Ashlan d Petroleu m Mailin g Addres s

40 5 Clinto n Driv e P.O . Bo x 46 5 Galen aPark , T X 7754 7 150 0 Rhod e Islan d Ave. , N W Washington , D C 2000 5

1270 0 Northboroug h Driv e Houston , T X 7706 7 122 0 L Street , N W Washington , D C 2000 5 53 9 S . Mai n Stree t

. Findlay , O H 4584 0 Telephone/Fa x Numbe r (713)450-040 0 (713 ) 450-0450-fa x (202 ) 462-627 2

(281)874-794 7 (202 ) 682-824 9 (419)421-430 0 e-mai l Addres s

mehrau@gatx.co m ddarling@paint.or g j ackie_s@deq . state . la.u s th j ackson@equ i va . co m crowe@api.or g

JTWerner@MAPLLC.co m I n Attendanc e 

# • •

• (phone )

(phone )

p:\n819\meetings\rndtable\sighin2.wp d

## Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) MAC T Stakeholder s Meetin g Octobe r 5,199 9 Nam e Davi d Mazzocc o Pete r Goodie r Hal Tabac k Ken t C . Hustved t Robert Matejk a Tar aLanie r Affiliatio n

PP G Emc o Wheato n DT M Ha l Tabac k

Co . (HTC ) - Consultan t

t o AP I U.S . EP A Akz o Nobe l Coating s Ashlan dChemica l Co . Mailin g Addres s

250 1 Constan t Commen t Plac e Louisville , K Y 4029 9 37 8 Pase o Sonris a Walnut , C A 9178 9 Mai l Dro p 1 3 RTP,N C 2771 1 143 1 Progres s Ave . P.O . Bo x 212 4 Hig h Point , N C 2726 1 Telephone/Fa x Numbe r (412)492-547 6 (412 ) 492-5377-fa x (502 ) 266-667 7 (502 ) 266-668 9 - fax (909)869-118 8 (909 ) 869-1190-fa x (919)541-539 5 (919 ) 541-0246-fa x (336)801-087 2 (336 ) 883-952 5 - fax (614)790-357 7 (614 ) 790-608 0 - fax e-mai l Addres s

mazzocco@ppg.co m PGoodier@syltone.co m taback@ix.netcom.co m hustvedt.ken@epamail.epa.go v bob.c.matejka@akzo
nobel.co m I n Attendanc e 

# • (phone )



### •

•

• •



# < A p:\n8 3 l\meetings\rndtble\signin2.wp dP.1 7

Memorandu

m- 4t h Roundtable Octobe r 20 , 199 9 Pag e 1 0



### Attachmen t 2 - EPA/ES D Presentatio n

_ _ _P.1 8



### U.S . EP A - ORGANI C LIQUID S DISTRIBUTIO N MAC T RUL E

4t h STAKEHOLDER S MEETIN G EP A Environmenta

l Researc h Center (ER C Building) , Classroom # 1

9:00 9:00-9:1 5 9:15-10:1 5 10:15-10:3 0 10:30-11:4 0 11:40-12:3 0 12:30-1:1 5 1:15-1:45 1:45-2:00 2:00-3:0 0 3:0 0 Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort

h Carolina October 5,199 9
© Call-i n number : (919 ) 541-433 2



### Agend a Cal l Meeting t

o Order Introduction s U.S . EP A Review of Meeting Objective s an

dAgenda EP A Presentatio n (MAC

T Floors , U.S . EPA/PE S Draf t Rule Proposal , Impacts ) Brea k Questions/Discussio n All Participant s Lunc h Brea k EP A Presentatio n (Economi c Analysis ) U.S . EP A Economic s Grou p Questions/Discussio n All Participant s Brea k Discussion/Wrap-u

p All Participant s Meeting Adjour

n 

# /7P.1 9



# ORGANI C LIQUID S DISTRIBUTIO N (OLD ) MAC T RUL E DISCUSSIO N O F MAC T FLOORS , DRAF T RUL E PROPOSAL , AND IMPACT S OCTOBE R5,1999
FOURT H STAKEHOLDER

S MEETIN G

Waste and Chemica

l Processe s Grou p Emissio n Standard s Divisio n U.S . Environmental Protectio n Agenc y Research Triangl e Park , N C

_ _ _P.2 0

•

•

•

•

•

• 

# OVERVIE W Analysi s fromEP

A Survey • Industr

y segment s respondin g t o surve y • Model plant s • Baselin e emission s 

# MAC T Floor s • Storag e tank s • Loadin g rack s • Containe

r fillin g • Equipment

leak s 

# Draf t Regulator

y Requirement s • Applicabilit

y Draf t Control s 

# Rul e Impact s • Projecte d control s • Emissio n reduction s • Contro l cost s 

# Nex t Step s

3 

# / fP.2 1



# ORGANI C LIQUID S DISTRIBUTIO N INDUSTRY

< - Plant Site organi c liquid s OL D Emissio n

Sources :

- tank s

- equipmen t 

### Manufacturin g Facilitie s

- SOCMI

- refinerie s

- other industrie s 

## Curren t MAC T Coverag e OL D Emissio n Sources :

- tank s

- rack s

- container s

- equipmen t 

### Collocated

OLD Operations

Plant Site

Organi c liquid s (sam e emissio n source s a s — above ) Stand-alon e terminal s (ow n th e liquid s or

for-hir e storage ) Manufacturin g liqui d user s wit h n o curren t MAC T coverag e Crud e oi l pipelin e station s Organi c liquid s (sam e emissio n source s a s above ) 

### Independent

OLD Operations 

## -2-0P.2 2



# ANALYSI S FRO M EP ASURVE Y

7-\P.2 3 

# INDUSTR

Y SEGMENT S RESPONDIN G TO SURVE

Y Industr y Segment Chemical industr y Refinerie s Terminal s (for-hire ) Crud e oi l pipelin e station s Petroleu m terminal s Other s Total s No . o f

Response s 11 8 5 6 3 2 24 1 0 7 24 7 %of .

Response s (rounded ) 4 8 2 3 1 3 1 0 4 3 10 0 %o f

Segment Represente d 3 0 3 0 3 5 7 0 2 0

—

_____ _

# MODE L PLANT S

Mode l plant s ar

e use d fo r calculatio n o f

nationa l emissio n reduction s an dcos t impact s Mode l plant s summariz e th e characteristic s o f OL D operation s tha

t affect HAP emission s Emissio n source s ar

e describe d throug h paramete r range s base d on dat afromactual facilitie s 1 3 mode l plant s were develope d t o represen t th e OL D industr y Mem o o n mode l plant s wa s sent ou t t o stakeholder s on Jul y 28 , 199 9 Stakeholder

comment s on memo ar

e unde r revie w



# 2 3

# BASELIN E EMISSION S P.2 5



# Baseline : current

(1997 ) total HA P emission s fromOL D operation s nationwide , takin g existin g control s int o accoun t

Industr y Segmen t Chem . industr y Refinerie s Terminal s (for-hire ) Crude pipeline s Petroleum terminal s 

### Total s Storag e

Tank s 38,80 0 6,90 0 18,00 0 45 0 1,75 0 (55,900 

## Nationwid e HA P Total s (tons/yr )

Loadin g Rack s 4,70 0 2,10 0 2,90 0 0 30 0 10,00 0 Containe r

Equipmen t Fillin g Leak s 4 7 10,05 0

• 1 1,45 0 1 5,00 0 0 5 0 1 95 0 5 0 17,50 0 Total s 53,60 0 10,50 0 25,90 0 50 0 3,00 0 93,50 0 

# Value s ma

y chang e a s th e resul t

o f ongoin g reanalyse s

8 

# _2_ ±P.2 6



# MAC T FLOOR S

ZS "P.2 7



## MAC T FLOOR S 

# STORAG E TANK S Liquid s and tank

size s reporte di n survey tha t were belo w th e requeste d cutoff s (minimu m1,00

0 ppmw HAP , 0. 1 psia , 5,000 gal . capacity ) were no t considere d i n th e dat aanalysi s Larg e tank s storin g surveye d liquid s are controlle d usin g contro l device s o

r well-seale dfloatin g roof

s MAC T floors satisf

y HON level s o f

contro l (well-seale d floating roof

, contro l device , o

r equivalent ) fo

r thes e tank size/vapo r

pressure combinations : Tank s a t Existin g Source s Tank s a t Ne w Source s 1 . 20,000-40,00 0 gal . & 1.10,000-40,00 0 gal . & > 1.9 psi a> 1.9 psi a 2 . ..40,00 0 gal . & 2 . > 40,00 0 gal . & >0.7 5 psi a>0. 1 psi a

1 0

_____ _ __ _P.2 8 

# MAC T FLOOR S 

# CARG O TAN K LOADIN

G RACK S Many loadin g rack s (-40% ) transferrin g surveye d liquid s ar e controlle d usin g acontro l devic e (flare , enclose d combustion , carbo n adsorption , etc. ) MAC T Floo r

(existin g an d ne w sources) : Contro l organi c liqui d loadin g rack s a t 9 5 percen t efficiency , o r

t o 2 0 ppmv exhaus t concentratio n fo

r enclose d combustio n device s

• Restric t

loading s t o vapor-tigh t

carg o tank s

1 1 

# 2.1P.2 9



## MAC T FLOORS 

# CONTAINE

RFILLIN G Contro l device s ar

e i n us e a t abou t 25 % o f larg e container filling operation s MAC T floor

fo r larg e container s (5 5 gallo n drum s or larger) a t existin g an d ne w source s i s th e us e o f controlle d transfer s MAC T floo

r fo r container s smaller

than 5 5 gallon s i s "n o control "

12 7 2P.3 0 

## MAC T FLOORS 

# EQUIPMEN T LEAK S Approximatel y 3 5 percen t o f respondin g facilitie s hav e aformal leak detectio n an d repai r progra m(instrumen t

LDAR ) MAC T floor

for existin g an d ne w sources :

• Instrumen t

LDA Rprogra msimilar

t o existin g Federa l program s Th e EP A ha s requeste d dat afromstakeholder s o n result s o f

existin g LDA Rprogram s at OL D facilitie s i n orde r

t o evaluat e thei r

effectivenes s

1 3 

# ZPtP.3 1



# DRAF T REGULATOR

Y REQUIREMENT S

1 4

___ _

## DRAF T REGULATOR Y REQUIREMENT S 

# APPLICABILIT Y Rul e applie s t o existing , new , an d reconstructe d OL D operation s Principa l type s o f

OL D operations : • Dedicate d liqui dterminal facilitie s (for-hir e and/o r proprietary ) • Operation s collocate d wit h SOCMI facilities , refineries , othe

r manufacturin g plan t

site s 

# • Crud e oil pipeline pumping/breakou t station s Majo r source s onl y (determinatio n mus t b e don e fo r entir e plan t

site ) Applie s t o liquid s wit h 5 % b y weigh t o r mor e o f th e organi c HA P liste d i n th e OL D HA P tabl e Exclude s gasoline , Avgas , an d fuel s consume d o r dispense d o n th e plan t

sit e N o duplicat e coverag e for emissio n source s alread y covere d b y anothe r

Titl e II I MAC T standar d 1 5 

# S IP.3 3



## DRAF T REGULATOR

Y REQUIREMENT S 

# TABL E O F ORGANI C HA P FO R OL D

NESHA P Onl y th e HA P liste d i n thi s tabl e wil l b e covere d b y th e OL

D MAC T standard Thi s tabl e wa s create db y combinin g HA P reporte d i n th e OL

D dat abas e an d Tabl e 2 o f 4 0 CF R63 , subpar

t G o f th e HO N Thi s tabl e onl y include s organi c HAP wit h vapo r pressure s >0. 1 psi aa

t 2 5 degree s C (approx . 7 7 degree s F ) Include s 6 5 organi c HAP compounds , an d exclude s 5 5 organi c HAP compound s

1 6

^ ^P.3 4


## DRAF T REGULATOR

Y REQUIREMENT S 

# Organi c HA P fo r OLD NESHA P Compoun d nam e l,4Dioxan e 1, 3 Dichloropropen e 1,1, 2 Trichloroethan e 1,2 Epoxypropan e (propyleneoxide ) 2 Butanon e (methy l ethy l ketone , MEK ) Acetaldehyd e Acetamid e Acetonitril e Acryli c Aci d Acrylonitril e Ally l Chlorid e ( 3 chloropentene ) Benzen e Bis(Chloromethyl)Ethe r Bromoform(tribromomethane ) Bromomethan e Butadiene-(1,3 ) Carbo n Disulfid e Carbo n Tetrachlorid e Chlorobenzen e Chloroethan e (ethy l chloride ) Chloroform Chloromethan e (methylchloride ) Chloropren e Cumen e (isopropylbenzene ) CA S Numbe r 123-91- 1 542-75- 6 79-00- 5 75-56- 9 78-93- 3 75-07- 0 60-35- 5 75-05- 8 79-10- 7 107-13- 1 107-05- 1 71-43- 2 542-88- 1 75-25- 2 74-83- 9 106-99- 0 75-15- 0 56-23- 5 108-90- 7 75-00- 3 67-66- 3 74-87- 3 126-99- 8 98-82- 8 

## 1 7 

# S 3P.3 5



## DRAF T REGULATOR

Y REQUIREMENT S 

# Organi c HA P fo r OLD NESHA P Compoun d nam e Dichloroethan e (1,2 ) (ethylen e dichloride ) Dichloroethan e (1,1 ) ethylidenedichlorid e Dichloroethy l Ethe r Dichloropropan e 1,2 Dimethy l Hydrazin e (1,1 ) Epichlorohydri n Epoxybutan e 1,

2 Ethenylbenzen e (styrene ) Ethy l Acrylat e Ethylbenzen e Ethylen e Dibromid e Ethylen e Oxid e Formaldehyd e Glyco l Ether s Hexan e (-n ) Hydrazin e Methano l Methy l Isocyanat e Methy l Hydrazin e Methy l Methacrylat e Methy l Tert-Buty l Ethe r Methy l Isobuty l Keton e Methylen e Chlorid e (dichloromethane ) CA S Numbe r 107-06- 2 75-34- 3 111-44- 4 78-87- 5 57-14- 7 106-89- 8 106-88- 7 100-42- 5 140-88- 5 100-41- 4 106-93- 4 75-21- 8 50-00- 0 Variou s 110-54- 3 302-01- 2 67-56- 1 624-83- 9 60-34- 4 80-62- 6 1634-04- 4 108-10- 1 75-09- 2 

### 1 8 

# 3_

LP.3 6

• 

## DRAF T REGULATOR Y REQUIREMENT S 

# Organic HA

P for OL D NESHA

P Compoun d nam e Nitropropan e 2 Phosgen e (decomposes ) Propana l (propionaldehyde ) Propena l (acrolein ) Tetrachloroethan e (1,1,2,2 ) Tetrachloroethen e Toluen e Trichloroethan e 1,1, 1 methy l chloroform Trichloroethylen e Triethylamin e Trimethylpentan e 2,2, 4 Viny l Acetat e Viny l Chlorid e Vinyliden e Chlorid e (se e 1, 1 dichloroethene ) Xylen e (-p ) Xylen e (-o ) Xylen e (-m ) Xylene s (Isomer s an d Mixtures ) CA S Numbe r 79-46- 9 75-44- 5 123-38- 6 107-02- 8 79-34- 5 127-18- 4 108-88- 3 71-55- 6 79-01- 6 121-44- 8 540-84- 1 108-05- 4 75-01- 4 75-35- 4 106-67- 9 95-47- 6 108-38- 3 1330-20- 7

1 9 

# si r

## DRAF T REGULATOR Y REQUIREMENT S 

# DRAFT CONTROLS Emissio n Sourc e Standard s fo r Existin g an d Ne w Source s Storag e tank s 1 . Existin g sources : 20k-40k ga l & >1. 9 psia ; >40

k ga l & >0.7 5 psi a 2 . Ne w sources : 10k-40

k ga l & > 1. 9 psia ; >40kgal & >0. 1 psi a Floatin g roo f wit h require d ri m seal s an d fitting s controls , contro l devic e fo r fixed-roo f

tanks , or equivalent control s (simila

r t o HON ) Container fillin g (5 5 gal . o r larger) * Goo d engineerin g and safet y practice s fromNational Emissio n Standard s fo

r Containers , 4 0 CF

R 63 , subpar t P P [6 1 FR34186 , 7-1 - 96] : submerge d fill , vapo r balance , vapo r

recovery , etc . Loadin g rack s (carg o tanks) * 9 5 percent contro l (or

2 0 ppm v fo r combustio n devices) , plu s annua l carg o tan k vapo r tightnes s tes t Equipment

leak s Lea k detectio n and repai r

(LDAR) progra msimila r t o HO N progra

m or t o other LDARprogram s under 4 0 CF R60 , 61 , or

6 3 * Would appl

y to organi c liquid s containin g a t leas t 5 percent b y weight o f th e HA P in th e OL D HA P table . I n addition , volume-weighte d vapor pressure cutoff

s (fo r example , 0. 5 psi afo r total liquid ) and liqui d throughput cutoff s ar e bein g investigate d tha

t woul d exempt low-emittin g liquid s an

d transfe r operation s wit

h ver y small volume s o f

activity . 

### 2 0 

## 2>(oP.3 8



# RUL E IMPACT S

2 1



# _ 7

## RULE IMPACT S



# PROJECTE D O.L.D . CONTROL S Approx . 47 5 facilitie s ar

e expecte d t o institut e a

n instrumen t

LDARprogra

mfo r OL D equipmen t Man y o f thes e facilitie s woul d als o nee d t o instal l additional controls : 1,20 0 ne w floatin g roof

s installe di n fixed
roo f tank s a t 150 + facilitie s

• 41 0 ri msea

l upgrade s t o existin g floatin g roof s a t 90 + facilitie s

• Contro l devic e installe d t o contro l loadin g rack s a t u p t o 9 0 facilitie s

• Number

o f facilitie s that

woul d nee d t o modif y thei r fillin g practice s fo

r larg e container s i s presentl y unknow n

2 2 

# .3 ^

## RUL E IMPACT S



# EMISSION REDUCTION S Emissio n Sourc e Storag e tank s Loadin g rack s Container s Equipment Total s HA P Emission s (tons/yr )

Baselin e 65,90 0 10,000 5 0 17,500 93,40 0 Afte r

Rul e 52,20 0 70 0 5 9,40 0 62,30 0 Reductio n

13,700(21% ) 9,30 0 (93% ) 4 5 (90% ) 8,100(46% ) 31,10 0 (33% )

2 3 

## 2>< 7P.4 1 

## RUL E IMPACT S 

# CONTROL COST S Emissio n Sourc e Controlle d Ad d contro l device s to fixed-roo f tank s Upgrad e floatin g roo f

tank s Ad d contro l device s to loadin g rack s Maintai n vapor-tight

carg o tank s Add contro l practice s fo

r larg e container filling Perfor mLDA Rprogram s Tota l Nationwid e Annua l Cos t $2. 8 million/y r $1. 5 million/yr $6.6 million/yr <t o b e determined > <t o b e determined > $59. 5 million/y r $70.4 + million/y r

2 4

___ _P.4 2



# NEX T STEP S Consider stakeholder

comment s i n completin g analyse s an d rul e proposal Internal EPA an dOMB review s o f draf t rul e an d suppor t material s Rul e proposal i n Augus t

200 0 Rul e promulgatio n i n October 200 1

2 5 

# HiP.4 3

Memorandum- 4t

h Roundtabl e Octobe r 20 , 199 9 Pag e 1 1



### Attachmen t 3 - EPA/ISE G Presentatio n

_ _P.4 4



# Economi c and Smal l Entity Analysi s

Informatio n fo r Organi c Liqui d Distributio n NESHA P

Stakeholder s 

# \8SU)

Prepare d b y Offic e o f Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an d Standard s Innovativ e Strategie s an d Economic s Grou p

Septembe r 20,199 9



# ^ 3P.4 5

Larr y Sorrel s (919 ) 541-504 1 (919 ) 541-083 9 fa

x sorrels.larry@epa.go v

Fo r additiona l informatio n o n economi c analyse s a t OAQPS , includin g guideline s fo r conductin g economi c impac t analyse s an d download s o f complete d NESHA P (MACT ) economi c impac t

studies , visi t

th e Economic and

Cost Analysis Support

pag e a t 

# vrww.epa.gov/ttn/eca s

J____£ .P.4 6

Backgroun d
Wha tar e economic analyses? *• Analyse s o f

economi c impact s (marke t an d financial ) an d economi c benefit s (health an d welfare ) • I n thi s context , analyse s o f regulator y cost s (facility an d national ) ar e no t economi c analyse s Wh y conduc teconomi c analyses ? • Fulfil l statutor y requirement s an d requirement s o f Presidentia l Directive s (se e Tabl e 1 an d Figur e 1 ) • Provid e infonnatio n t o th e regulator y tea mtha t i s usefu l in decidin g th e level , form , o r constructio n (e.g. , subcategorization ) o f standard s Wha td o w e tr y t o estimat e i n a n economi c analysis ? Benefit-Cost

Analyses • Socia l benefits : quantit y an d monetar y valu e o f health an d welfar e benefit s (e.g. , valu e o f avoide d cance r incidences ) for

al l population s an d selec t subpopulation s (e.g. , childre n minorit y populations , low-incom e populations) . Note : benefit s analyse s ar e normall y onl y conducte d fo r majo r rule s (e.g . tota l annua l nationwid e cost s > $10 0 million ) • Socia l costs , i f

significantl y differen t

fromengineerin g cost s (e.g. , cos t associate d with aproduc t ban ) Economic Impact

Analyses • Magnitud e o f

pric e an d quantit y change s i n affecte d produc t market s • Change s i n industr y structur e • Potentia l employmen t effect s • Differentia l impact s o n specifi c subgroups : smal l entitie s (fo r SBREF A purposes) , governmen t entities , minorit y populations , low-incom e population s • Potentia l internationa l trad e impact s • Change s i n industr y an d compan y financia l health Wha tinformatio n i s neede d t o conduc teconomi c analyses ? (se e Figur e 2 ) Benefit-Cost

Analyses *• Characteristic s o f affecte d huma n an d othe r population s • Willingnes s t o pa y (o r proxy ) for

health an d welfar e improvement s (an d disbenefits ) Economic Impact

Analyses • Incrementa l fixed an d variabl e contro l cost s for regulator y alternative s (actua l plant s o r readil y mappe d mode l plants) . Incrementa l refer s t o cost s abov e baselin e conditions . • Suppl y an d deman d characteristic s o f affecte d produc t

market s • Representativ e financia l dat ao n affecte d companie s • • Identit y an d characteristic s o f smal l entitie s an d affecte d governmen t entitie s

-1 - 

# tyrTabl e 1 : Statute s an d Executiv e Order s Requirin g Economi c Analyse s *

Benefit-Cos t

Analysi s Impac t Analysi s Statute s Periodi c assess'men t of cost s an dbenefit s of

th e CA A (CA A §312 )

Executiv e Order s E.0.12866 : Regulatory

Plannin g an d Revie w Economi c impac t assessmen t

of specifi c standard s an d regulation s unde r th e CA A (CA A §317 ) Employmen t

impact s (CA

A §321(a) ) Smal l community impact s (CA A §810 ) Foreig n trad e impact s (CA A §811(b) ) Regulatory Flexibility Ac t (RFA ) Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t

(SBREFA ) Unfunde d Mandate s ReformAc t (UMRA ) Paperwor k

Reductio n Ac t

(PRA ) E.0.12866 : Regulator y Plannin g an d Revie w E.0.12875 : Enhancin g th e Intergovernmenta l Partnershi p E.0.12898 : Federa l Action s t o Addres s Environmenta l Justic e i n Minorit y Population s an d Low-Incom e Population s E.0.13045 : Protectio n o f Childre n fro m Environmenta l Healt h Risk s an d Safet y Risk s

-2 -

___ •P.4 8

- T Figur e 1 :EconomicAnalysisDriversImpactAnalysisDrivers Sequenc e o f Question s fo r

Determinin g th e Necessar y Impac t Analyse s

Decisio n to Regulat e

V Preliminar y Screenin g Assessmen t

V | E.0.12866 : Is th e Rulemakin g a Significan tRegulator y Action ?

YE S r Benefit-Cos tAnalysi s > N O Economi c Impac

tAssessmen t 

### i

•\r V E.O . 1287 5 —UMRA : Doe s Regulator y Actio n hav e significan timpac to n

State , local , o r triba l governments ? YE S 1 | ' Analysi s o f

impact s o

n State , local , an d triba l government s

> ' ' N O Statemen to f n o impac t v RFA & SBREFA : Doe s Regulator y Actio n hav e majo r impac to n s m YE S ' Regulator y Flexibility Analysi s

' ' al l entities ? N O Certif y n o significantimpac

t > PR A & 5 CF R1320 : Doe s Regulator y Actio n resul ti n reporti i recordkeepin g requirements ? YE S | ' Informatio n Collectio n Reques t

> ' > E.O . 13045 : Doe s Regulator y Actio n impac tth e health o r safety o f i YE S | > Analysi s o f

impact s o n children' s healt

h ^^^^^^^ J ' ^ ' igo r !

' hildren ? !

' E.O . 12898 : Doe s Regulator y Actio n impac tlow-incom e o r minority populations ? YE S > Analysi s of

Equity Impact s ' :

' Analysi s Specification s 

# HIP.4 9

Figur e 2 : Flo w of

Analytica l Informatio n i n Regulator y Developmen t

Dat a Collectio n populatio n data emission s dat

a contro l device s

equipmen tcharacteristic s
Engineerin g Analysi s mode l facilitie s • regulator y option s Industr y Profil e Demographi c Data

Locatio n Emission s

Reduction s Costs 

# 1 Marke t Informatio n Smal l Busines s

Characteristic s

Ai r Qualit y Modelin g an d Ris k Analysi s Health an d Environmenta l Effect s "Economi c Impac tAnalysis " marke tadjustment s welfar e effects financia l analysi s "impact " analysi s (SBREFA , UMRA , etc ) 

# 1 Benefit s Analysi s Emission s Change s < ' Socia l Benefit s "Economi c Analysis " (majo r rules ) Socia l Cost s Distributiona l

Effect s

Economi c Informatio n Use d i n Regulator y Decisio n Makin g -4 - 

# £___ _P.5 0

Informatio n o n EP A Smal l Entit y Analyse s Wha tar e smal l entit y analyses ?

• Smal l entit y analyse s provid e estimates o f impact s t o smal l entitie s (i.e. , businesses , nonprofi t firms, an d communitie s o r governments ) fro mimplementatio n o f aregulation . Th e impact s estimate d includ e th e following : * Numbe r

o f smal l businesses , nonprofi t firms, an d communitie s o r government s potentiall y affected , an d th e proportio n o f smal l businesse s affecte d in a n industr y facin g implementatio n o f arul e * Cost s o f

complianc e a s apercentag e o f sale s o r revenue s for

affecte d smal l entities . Thi s compariso n o f

complianc e cost s t o sale s i s calle d ascreenin g analysis .

• Smal l entit y analyse s ar e NO T cos t analyses . Smal l entit y analyse s us e cost s o f complianc e a s an input .

• Smal l entit y analyse s ar e asubse t o f th e economi c impac t

analyse s th e EP A conduct s fo r eac h rul e tha t wil l b e implemented . Economi c impac t analyse s provid e estimate s o f impact s t o al l entitie s affecte d b y implementatio n o f arule , no t

jus t th e smal l entities . Wh y conduc tsmal l entit y analyses ?

• Fulfil l lega l requirements . Smal l entit y analyse s ar e require d b y th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t

Fairnes s Ac t

(SBREFA) . SBREF A i s a n amendmen t

t o th e Regulator y Flexibilit y Ac t (RFA) , an Ac t

signe d in 198 0 requirin g Federa l agencie s to " conduc t analyse s o f

impact s t o smal l entitie s fromcomplianc e with thei r rules . Smal l entit y analyse s ar e know n a s Regulator y Flexibilit y Analyse s becaus e the y wer e first require d b y thi s Act . I n addition , th e EP A i s require d t o estimat e impact s t o smal l communitie s unde r Sectio n 81 0 o f

th e Clea n Ai r

Act . Provid e informatio n t o th e rulemaker s tha t i s usefu l in decidin g th e level , form , o r desig n o f standards . Smal l entit y analyse s can b e particularl y usefu l i n decidin g t o subcategoriz e a standar d (tha t

is , contro l acertai n typ e o f source s in a

n affecte d industr y differentl y tha n th e rest) .

-5 - 

# HI