alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KPMG LLP
2500 Ruan Center
666 Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Assertion
of Management of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, NA.
(the Company), that the Company complied with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures, as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/KPMG LLP

February 23, 2005


WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE
1 Home Campus Des Moines, IA 50328

Assertion of Management of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells
Fargo Bank, N. A.

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage,
a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the Company) has complied in all
material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers.

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond
along with an errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $100 million and
$20 million, respectively.

February 23, 2005

/s/Michael J. Heid
Michael J. Heid, Division President, Capital Markets, Finance & Administration

/s/Franklin R. Codel
Franklin r. Codel, Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Real Estate
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

/s/Michael Lepore
Michael Lepore, Executive Vice President, Institutional Lending
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

/s/Mary Coffin
Mary Coffin, Executive Vice President, Servicing & Post Closing
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

761 

CA 10-02320 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

BARBARA MILLER AND RICHARD HUGO MILLER, 

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, 

V ORDER

LAURIEANN BUCK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, 

SALVATORE SPINUZZA AND LABELLA SICILIA, INC., 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

LOTEMPIO & BROWN, P.C., BUFFALO (PATRICK J. BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. 

LAW OFFICES OF LAURIE G. OGDEN, BUFFALO (PAMELA S. SCHALLER OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick

J. Marshall, J.), entered October 8, 2010 in a personal injury action. 

The order granted the motion of defendants Salvatore Spinuzza and

LaBella Sicilia, Inc. for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint

and all cross claims against them. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme

Court.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132314 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132314 COA: 273088 Oakland CC: 2006-209222-FH HENRY WOLFE, a/k/a HENRY LEE 50 th DC: 06-52357-SL WOLFE, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
No. 07-40202

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40202

ROBERT CLAYTON CROW

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

THERESA RELKIN; REX SPOTTEDBEAR; JOHN DOE; ROBERT BURBY;

CARLOS ALCOCER; RICCI RYAN OSTERMAYER; JAMES YANAS; CITY

OF TEXAS CITY, TEXAS 

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-653

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and GARWOOD and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Crow appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment

to the Defendants and awarding Defendants their costs. This Court has

considered the record in light of the briefs and oral argument, and we affirm.

The evidence does not establish that all reasonable police officers would have

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 1, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40202

2

found probable cause lacking under the facts of this case, and Defendants are

therefore entitled to qualified immunity. Babb v. Dorman, 33F.3d. 472, 477 (5th

Cir. 1994). We likewise find no abuse of discretion in the award of costs to

Defendants. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,496
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,950
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,591
<OTHER-SE>                                     550,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,496
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,222)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
----

----

|                                       |        |                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:    September 28, 2009 |        | /s/Daniel R. Herndon                  |   |
|                                       | Name:  | Daniel R. Herndon                     |   |
|                                       | Title:      | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

|                                       |        |                                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:    September 28, 2009 |        | /s/Clyde D. Patterson                                 |   |
|                                       | Name:  | Clyde D. Patterson                                    |   |
|                                       | Title:      | Executive Vice President(Principal Financial Officer) |   |
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities     Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                                                                              |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: April      8, 2008 | By:    | /s/       Norman      Proulx                                                                 |   |
|                          |   | Norman      Proulx                                                                                |   |
|                          |   | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer & Chief Accounting      Officer |   |
|                          |   |                                                                                              |   |
EXHIBIT 31.2

                            ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

       I, Marlene Fahey, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, the Trustee in respect of the USAutos Series 2004-1 Trust (the
"Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in this annual report, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
          report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion in
          such distribution reports is included in such reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee
          under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based on my
          knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee has
          fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 28, 2006


/s/ Marlene J. Fahey
--------------------------------
Marlene J. Fahey, Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,559,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              00
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    00
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 28,130,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      28,046,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        15,108,000
<LOANS>                                    234,450,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,268,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             312,906,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 241,501,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                30,002,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         12,638,000
<LONG-TERM>                                         00
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               00
<PREFERRED>                                         00
<COMMON>                                     2,404,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,361,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             312,906,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,787,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,217,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               405,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            12,409,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,280,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,064,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,065,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  233,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (10,000)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,174,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,619,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,619,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     00
<CHANGES>                                           00
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,140,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.55
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,698,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   262,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               946,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     00
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,261,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  293,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    67,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,268,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,268,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 00
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,397
<SECURITIES>                                    22,168
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,127
<PP&E>                                           8,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,638
<BONDS>                                          1,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           420
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,354
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,165)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

JORDAN JAIME SILVER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-2546 March 27, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Jonah K. Dickstein, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. BLACK, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Stephen E. Anbinder, certify that: l.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K/A of The National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports); 2.          Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.          Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4.          Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement included as an exhibit to this annual report, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and 5.          The Exchange Act periodic reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standard based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that is included as an exhibit to this annual report.      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee

Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency


Date: September 29, 2005/s/ Stephen E. AnbinderStephen E. AnbinderPresidentNational Collegiate Funding LLC
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0581

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SCOTT W. ELLISON,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for an extension of time, and good

cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including

July 25, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 18 2021

06/18/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0581
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 266 

To redesignate the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge as the Sam D. Hamilton 

Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2011 

Mr. COCHRAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge as 

the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE NOXUBEE NATIONAL 

4 WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Noxubee National Wildlife 

6 Refuge, located in the State of Mississippi, is redesignated 

7 as the ‘‘Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Ref8 uge’’. 

9 (b) BOUNDARY REVISION.—Nothing in this Act pre10 vents the Secretary of the Interior from making adjustVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:59 Feb 04, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S266.IS S266

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 266 IS

1 ments to the boundaries of the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee 

2 National Wildlife Refuge (referred to in this section as the 

3 ‘‘Refuge’’), as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, 

4 to carry out the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge 

5 System in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge 

6 System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et 

7 seq.) and any other applicable authority. 

8 (c) ADDITION OF LAND.—Nothing in this Act pre9 vents the Secretary of the Interior from adding to the Ref10 uge new land or parcels of the National Wildlife Refuge 

11 System, as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, to 

12 carry out the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge Sys13 tem in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge Sys14 tem Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) 

15 and any other applicable authority. 

16 (d) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any statute, 

17 rule, regulation, executive order, publication, map, paper, 

18 or other document of the United States to the Noxubee 

19 National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to refer to the Sam 

20 D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2450 

To suspend temporarily the duty on nonenumerated footwear with textile 

uppers for women, other than house slippers, valued $13/pair or higher. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on nonenumerated footwear 

with textile uppers for women, other than house slippers, 

valued $13/pair or higher. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NONENUMERATED FOOTWEAR WITH TEXTILE 

4 UPPERS FOR WOMEN, OTHER THAN HOUSE 

5 SLIPPERS, VALUED $13/PAIR OR HIGHER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2450 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Nonenumerated footwear 

with textile uppers for 

women, other than house 

slippers, valued $13/pair or 

higher (provided for in subheading 6405.20.90) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS