alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October	7 ,	2015

Docket	Operations,	M

- 30

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE.,	Room	W12

- 140	West	Building	Ground	Floor

Washington,	DC	20590

- 0001

Subject: Request	for	Amendment	to	Exemption	No.	11835

Regulato ry	Docket	No.	FAA

- 2015

- 1161

Dear	Staff:

Pursuant	 to	Section	 333	 of	 the	 FAA	Modernization	and	Reform	Act	 of	 2012	and	 14	 C.F.R.	 §11.81,

Wohnrade	Civil	Engineers,	Inc.	(the	“Petitioner”)	hereby	submits	its	request	for	the	amendment	to

its	Section	333	Exempt ion	No.	11835,	granted	on	June	16,	2015,	to	include	the	Eve nt	38	E384	fixed

wing	aircraft.

The	E384	UAS	is	manufactured	by	Event	38.	All	manufacturers	recommendations	related	to	safety

guidelines	will	be	referenced	to	ensure	the	safe	operation	of	the	smal l	UAS	in	the	national	airspace,

which	shall	include	all	Event	38	instructional	videos	and	written	or	published	safety	guidelines	for

the	E384	aircraft.

Attached	 are	 the	 Operations	 Manual	 and	 Spec	 Sheet	 for	 the	 E384	 aircraft,	 which	 contains	 the

following:

● General	Information,

● Operating	Limitations,

● Normal	Procedures,

● Aircraft	and	Systems	Description,

● Handling,	Service	and	Maintenance	Procedures.

The	 findings,	 rationale,	 conclusions,	 conditions	 and	 limitations	 contained	 in	 the	 Fede ral	 Aviation

Administration’s	Grant	of	Exemption	No.	11835,	in	addition	to	the	operational	procedures	outlined

by	 the	 Petitioner’s	 original	 Petition	 for	 Exemption	 dated	 March	 27,	 2015,	 apply	 to	 the	 herein

request	 to	include	 the	Event	38	E384	aircraft	in	Ex emption	 to	No.	11835.	Furthermore,	 there	has

been	 no	 change	in	 the	 conditions	 and	 reason	 relative	 to	 public	interest	 and	 safety	 that	 were	 the

basis	for	granting	the	original	exemption. 

## Wohnrade Civil Engineers, Inc.Request	for	Am endment	to	Exemption	11835

Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA

- 2015

- 1161

October	7,	2015

Page 2

11582 Colony Row , Broomfield

, Colorado 80021

Phone: 720

- 259

- 0965

Fax: 720

- 259

- 1519 Wohnrade	Civil	Engineers,	Inc.

Thank	 you	 for	 your	 consideration	 of	 this	 request.	 Please	 advise	 Wo hnrade	 of	 any	 additional

information	that	may	be	required.

Very	respectfully,

WOHNRADE	CIVIL	ENGINEERS,	INC.

Mary	B.	Wohnrade,	P.E.

- Principal

Registered	Engineer

- CO,	IL,	NV

mary@wcecivil.com
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 29, 2011 

d0622 

Order 

 

June 29, 2011 

142022(56) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142022 

 COA: 290691 

Kent CC: 08-011337-FC 

BRANDON BERNARD BELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 8, 

2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2749 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or coprecitates 

of yttrium oxide and europium oxide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures 

or coprecitates of yttrium oxide and europium oxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OR COPRECITATES OF YTTRIUM 

4 OXIDE AND EUROPIUM OXIDE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.04 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 mixtures or coprecipitates of yttrium oxide and europium 

8 oxide) is amended by striking the date in the effective pe9 riod column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2749 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Hugh N. Coltharp certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant;  2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and  6. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this Annual Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Dated:  March 21, 2008 /s/ Hugh N. Coltharp Hugh N. Coltharp Secretary/Treasurer and director
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities

Committee (FRRCC)

MEETING AGENDA

June 22 – 23, 2011

Sheraton National Hotel

900 South Orme Street

Arlington, VA 22204

Galaxy Ballroom

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

8:00 am REGISTRATION (Hotel)

8:30 Call to Order / Discussion of Meeting Agenda and Committee 

Process

 Alicia Kaiser, FRRCC Designated Federal Officer

 Dr. Steven Balling, FRRCC Chair

 Lawrence Elworth, Agricultural Counselor to the Administrator, 

EPA

 Mark Joyce, Associate Director, Office of Federal Advisory 

Committee Management and Outreach, EPA

 Abby Dilley, FRRCC Facilitator

9:00 Stakeholder Panel

 Andrew Sharpley, Professor, Division of Agriculture, University 

of Arkansas (20 min + 10 min Q&A)

 Patricia Sinicropi, Director, Legislative Affairs, National 

Association of Clean Water Agencies (20 min + 10 min Q&A)

 Tom Hebert, Bayard Ridge Group LLC (20 min + 10 min Q&A)

10:30 Charge to Discussion Groups

10:45 Discussion Group Breakout Session

12:15 pm BREAK / Boxed lunches handed out

12:30 Plenary Working Lunch / Discussion Groups Report to Committee

1:30 BREAK
1:45 Stakeholder Panel

 Hobey Bauhan, President, Virginia Poultry Federation (20 min + 

10 min Q&A)

 Michael Plumer, Consultant, Conservation Agriculture (20 min 

+ 10 min Q&A)

 Robert Bonnie, Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Environment 

and Climate, USDA (20 min + 10 min Q&A)

3:15 Discussion Group Breakout Session

5:30 Public Comment Session 

6:00 ADJOURN

Thursday, June 23, 2011

7:30 am REGISTRATION (Hotel)

8:00 Call to Order / Discussion Groups Report to Committee

9:00 Charge to Discussion Groups

9:15 Discussion Group Breakout Session

10:45 BREAK

11:00 Discussion Groups Report Back to Committee

11:45 Plenary Discussion

 Themes from this meeting

 Goals for next meeting

 Next steps

12:30 pm Public Comment Session 

1:00 ADJOURN
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0030 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM183AD
ALI A300 AI/SE - M2/95A.1308/07, I4 --- 6/08 ALI A310 AI/SE - M2/95A.1309/07, I7 --- 6/08 ALI A300 -600 AI/SE - M2/95A.1310/07, I12 --- 6/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supp lemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
**Exhibit
      32**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002












Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This
      8th
      day of May, 2007








/s/
      David D. Stovall


Chief
      Executive Officer








/s/
      Annette Banks


Chief
      Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2801 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 180. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 180. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 180. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Pigment Yellow 180 (CAS 

No. 77804–81–0) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.17.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2801 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection   with  the  Amended  Annual  Report  of  Highriver   Acquisition
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Brian Kawamura,  President of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Date: June 14, 2007                              By: /s/ Brian Kawamura
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Brian Kawamura
                                                    President and Director

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to  Highriver  Acquisition  Corp.  and will be  retained  by  Highriver
Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bridge Capital
Holdings for the year ended  December 31, 2006, I, Thomas A. Sa,  Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Bridge Capital Holdings, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  such Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in such Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of Bridge
     Capital Holdings.



Date: March 1, 2007    /s/ THOMAS A. SA
                           _____________________________
                           Thomas A. Sa
                           Executive Vice President
                           Chief Administrative Officer
                           Chief Financial Officer
                           (Principal Financial Officer)
California Home ARB: Home Search Site Map Software Contact Us AQD: Home

Select 8 Summary FAQs

Ozone PM10

National 8-Hour Design Value Est #Days > Natl 24-Hour Standard

Monitoring Sites 2012 2013 2012 2013

Eastern Kern 8-Hour Ozone Planning Area

Kern County

Mojave-923 Poole Street 0.079 0.081 * *

Notes: PM10 statistics may include data that are related to an exceptional event.

* There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value.

Go to: Data Statistics Home Page Select 8 Summary Start Page
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 40070 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Alejandro Diaz**

**- Roman,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19

- CR

- 757

- 1

Before **King, Southwick,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro Diaz

Roman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Diaz

- Roman has not filed a response. We have

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 25, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40070 Document: 00515914683 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/25/2021No. 20

- 40070

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for app ellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2

. Case: 20-40070 Document: 00515914683 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/25/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,487
<SECURITIES>                                     1,226
<RECEIVABLES>                                      445
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        573
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,214
<PP&E>                                          63,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,869
<BONDS>                                         10,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,877
<SALES>                                          3,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,950
<CGS>                                            2,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    341
<INCOME-TAX>                                        48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       293
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
M.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1695

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION  I, Steve M. Hanni, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Medizone International, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer=s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer=s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer=s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer=s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting.  Date: June 26, 2008  /s/Steve M. Hanni Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0927 Directorate ID : 2012 - SW - 052 - AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model AB412 and AB412 EP Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 0 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : These actions of this AD are intended to prevent detachment of the hoist hook assembly from the helicopter and subsequent loss of an external load, possibly resulting in personal injury . Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ Labor per Helicopter ( X x $ 8 5 /work - hour for the inspection) $ Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedure s : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Sharon Miles
**Exhibit 32.1****CENTERPLATE, INC.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K ofCenterplate, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodending December 28, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Lawrence E. Honig, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Lawrence E. Honig           Lawrence E. Honig     Chairman of the Board of Directors     and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 9, 2005