alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 1.3
 APPROVED BYExtraordinary General Meeting of shareholders
of Mechel OAOMinutes of the Extraordinary General
Meeting of shareholders No. 4 dated
April 30, 2008Chairman of extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders
 (V.V. Proskurnya)Secretary of the Meeting
 (O.A. Yakunina)
 AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER OF
 (hereinafter the Company)
 Moscow, 2008




---



##### 



1. Paragraph 7.4. of the Companys Charter shall be restated to read as follows:
  81,698,341
 138,756,915
 2. Paragraph 10.15 shall be added to Article 10 of the Companys Charter:
  3. Paragraph 11.3.9 of the Companys Charter shall be restated to read as follows:
  4. Paragraph 11.4. of the Companys Charter shall be restated to read as follows:




---



##### 



5. Paragraph 13.6. of the Companys Charter shall be restated to read as follows:
  6. Paragraph 13.7. of the Companys Charter shall be restated to read as follows:
  7. Paragraph 13.17. shall be added to Article 13 of the Companys Charter:




---



##### 



8. Paragraph 27.11. of the Companys Charter shall be restated to read as follows:
  27.11.1.
    
    firstly, payments shall be made for the shares that must be acquired by the Company
in compliance with this Charter;27.11.2.
    
    secondly, payment of declared but unpaid dividends on preferred shares and the
liquidation value thereof determined in accordance with this Charter;27.11.3.
    
    thirdly, the property of the Company shall be distributed among holders of common shares and holders of
preferred shares less any amount paid earlier towards the liquidation
value of preferred shares.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon
Lines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 25, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Mark Urbania, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    M. MARK URBANIA                                                                         
|M. Mark Urbania Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                                                               
|March 3, 2006
Exhibit 32.2 - CFO Certification

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 906
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon Correio, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ JON CORREIO        
|-----------------------
|Jon Correio            
|Vice President, Finance
|Date: November 11, 2008
Exhibit 99.1

[Chase Letterhead]



March 15, 2005



Chase Funding, Inc.
343 Thornall Street
Edison, NJ  08837



RE: Annual Statements as to Compliance


Pursuant to that certain Loan Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") dated as of
September 1, 2004, Chase Loan Acquisition Trust Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
Certificates, Series 2004-AQ1, I, Douglas C. Stephens, hereby certify that (I) a
review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding year and the
performance under this Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (II) to
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
its obligations under this Agreement for such year.

Sincerely,



/s/ Douglas C. Stephens
-------------------------------------
Douglas C. Stephens
Vice President Default Loan Servicing

HJB/em

cc:  Lorraine Rohrig

Enc.
S erved: September 28 , 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### EXPRESSJET AIRLINES

, INC

.

-----------------------------------------------------------



### NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On September 21, 2012

, ExpressJet Airlines

, Inc. (“ Express Jet ”)

, a U.S

. certificated air carrier, 1

request ed that the Department regist e r the trade name “American Eagle” for use in ExpressJet’s air

transportation operations

.

Part 215 (14 CFR § 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to use an

alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. Th e rule further states that the

Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air carriers

of the proposed use of the name. In this case, ExpressJet states it has been authorized by American

Airlines, Inc. (“American”) to use the American Eagle trade name in conjunction with its code shar ing

relationship with American

.

Since Express Jet has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the

trade name “ American Eagle ” for im mediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C. , September 28 , 2012

.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http:// www.regulations.gov

1 ExpressJet ’s i nterstate certificate w as last reissued by Order 2012

- 1

- 3 , on January 9 , 2012

.Attachment A

SE RVICE LIST FOR EXPRESSJET AIRLINES, INC

.

GERALD F MURPHY

COUNSEL FOR

EXPRESSJET AIRLINES INC

CROWELL & MORING LLP

1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20004 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT

FAA/AGC

- 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591 MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGE R

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2520 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2520

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on glyoxylic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on glyoxylic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GLYOXYLIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to glyoxylic acid) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Elizabeth Plaza, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Pedro J Lasanta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated: February 28, 2014





/s/ Elizabeth Plaza

/s/ Pedro J. LasantaElizabeth Plaza

Pedro J. LasantaChairman of the Board of Directors

Chief Financial Officer(principal executive officer)

(principal financial and accounting officer)





This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
AVANIR PHARMACEUTICA LS INC., Plaintiff

- Appellee

AVANIR HOLDING COMPANY, CEN TER FOR NEUROLOGICAL STUDY, Plaintiffs

v.

PAR PHARMACEUTICAL I NC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPA NIES INC., Defendants

- Appellants

______________________
2014

- 1838

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:11

- cv

- 00704

- LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
F. D OMINIC C ERRITO , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sul livan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff

appellee. Also represented by E RIC C. S TOPS , E VANGELINE S HIH , D ANIEL C. W IESNER

.J ANINE A. C ARLAN , Arent Fox, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants

- appellants. Also represented by R ICHARD J. B ERMAN , A ZIZ B URGY , T ANIEL E RMANO A NDERSON , S TEPHEN Y ANG

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (C HEN , L INN , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

August 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
---

Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Companys Report of Dynamic Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim Coupland, Principal Executive and I, Chantal Schutz, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/ s / Tim Coupland                       
|Tim Coupland, Principal Executive Officer

September 25, 2008



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/ s / Chantal Schutz                       
|Chantal Schutz, Principal Financial Officer

September 25, 2008





---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2797 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2797

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on leather basketballs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on leather basketballs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEATHER BASKETBALLS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to leather basketballs) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 260/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 260 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6310 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 260

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6310 August 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1171 of 7 August 2020 implementing Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1172 of 7 August 2020 implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African Republic | 8 |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Decision of the Management Board of Europol of 9 June 2020 on internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to processing of administrative personal data by Europol | 15 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1171 of 7 August 2020 implementing Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/1172 of 7 August 2020 implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African Republic

8

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Decision of the Management Board of Europol of 9 June 2020 on internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to processing of administrative personal data by Europol

15

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Brooktrout, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Leahy, VicePresident of Finance and Operations of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 12, 2003 | By:    | /s/  ROBERT  C. LEAHY                                                                            |
|--------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   | Robert  C. Leahy*Vice  President of Finance and Operations**(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Brooktrout, Inc. and will beretained by Brooktrout, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
J.R. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2150688

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017 Reh. denied February 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
r

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0273

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RANDY S. LAEDEKE,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILED

APR 2 1 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Randy S. Laedeke petitions this Court for rehearing of a March 24, 2020 Order

denying his motion for stay of execution and stay of proceedings pending the outcome of

his appeal. The State of Montana has filed a response in opposition.

Laedeke asserts that this Court erred in its decision because his situation meets all

three criteria for rehearing, pursuant to M. R. App. P. 20(1). Laedeke argues that this Court

should "grant a supersedeas" to avoid serious injury, pursuant to a general rule of law in

Nepstad v. East Chicago Oil Assn., 96 Mont. 183, 29 P.2d 643 (1934). Laedeke contends

that his request for a stay is warranted because he may be damaged irreparably by

complying with the Yellowstone County District Court's Order "to liquidate his remaining

five head of horses for pennies on the dollar of the value[d" when this Court could reverse

the court's decision on appeal.

The State maintains that Laedeke is not entitled to a stay or a rehearing. The State

contends that Laedeke advances arguments now similar to those he made in his previous

motion. The State argues that Laedeke does not clearly demonstrate exceptional

circumstances; that he does not raise any new material facts; and that he has not shown that

this Court overlooked any material fact or question. M. R. App. P. 22(1)(d), 22(1)(a)(i),

and 22(1)(a)(ii).

04/21/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0273
Upon review, we agree with the State that Laedeke has not demonstrated any

exceptional circumstances to warrant rehearing. M. R. App. P. 20(1)(d). We reiterate that

Laedeke's request for a stay is untimely. The District entered its judgment on revocation

on April 5, 2019. Laedeke waited nearly eleven months to seek a stay, filing his motion

the day before another scheduled revocation hearing. The court denied his motion as

untimely. Laedeke has not shown good cause for relief from that order.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Laedeke's Petition for Rehearing is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to

Randy S. Laedeke personally.

DATED this 7, —day of April, 2020.

Chief Justice

2

LA.11

51 A4 411——

Justices
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2638 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2638

 To suspend temporarily the duty on copoly(acrylic acid/itaconic acid).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on copoly(acrylic acid/itaconic acid).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COPOLY(ACRYLIC ACID/ITACONIC ACID).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Copoly(acrylic      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        acid/itaconic                                                      31/2015.......
                        acid) (CAS No.
                        25948-33-8)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3906.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2805 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical transformers rated 

at 40VA. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical 

transformers rated at 40VA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS RATED 

4 AT 40VA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2805 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 120 volt/60 Hz electrical 

transformers, each with dimensions of 86 mm by 71 

mm by 91 mm, containing a 

layered and uncut round core 

with two balanced bobbins, 

the foregoing rated at 40VA 

(provided for in subheading 

8504.31.40) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
D.K., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5229

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.