alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 9910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9778-8; CERCLA-04-2012-3777]

Circle Environmental 1 and 2 Sites; Dawson, 
Terrell County, GA; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency has entered into a settlement with thirty-four (34) parties to 
recover past cost resulting from a removal action at the Circle 
Environmental 1 and 2 Superfund Sites located in 
Dawson, Terrell County, Georgia.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
March 14, 2013. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments by Site name Circle Environmental 
 1 and 2 Site by one of the following methods:
    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov.
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street 
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: January 15, 2013.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-03252 Filed 2-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Avantair,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: September 28, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Steven Santo       
|                          |  |  |  |  |  | Steven Santo           
|                          |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                          |  |  | 
|Dated: September 28, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Carla Stucky       
|                          |  |  |  |  |  | Carla Stucky           
|                          |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely  for  the  purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned  Acting  Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"),  hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form  10-QSB/A  of  the  Company  for  the  quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report")  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of  the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.



Date:  February 28, 2006                /s/ Tami J Story
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Tami J Story
                                        Acting Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

** See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). 

Nevertheless, even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order

to preserve them. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th

Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a). Contentions not adequately

argued in the body of the brief are deemed abandoned. See id.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-41120

Conference Calendar

 

DANIEL LEE MILLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

VICKI BLANTON, KELLY RUTH PUGH,

ROSE MARY GARDNER, LISA CLEMENS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:94-CV-881

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel Lee Miller appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of

his pro se civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Giving Miller’s brief the liberal construction due pro se

pleadings,** the only challenge it presents to the district
No. 96-41120

-2-

court’s conclusions are those regarding his claims against

Blanton. However, Blanton is deceased, and Miller has taken no

steps to have the appropriate representative of Blanton’s estate

substituted into these proceedings. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED. Gamble v. Thomas, 655 F.2d 568, 569 (5th Cir. 1981);

Fed. R. App. P. 43(a). 

Miller has also filed a motion for oral argument. Because

the appeal is dismissed, the motion is DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Stephan Kuppenheimer, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.

Date: March 29, 2005                             /s/ Stephan Kuppenheimer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                  President
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

CHARLES TAYLOR CROCKETT, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0341 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2011-006752-003

The Honorable Ronee Korbin Steiner, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker

Counsel for Respondent

The Law Office of Stephen L. Crawford, P.L.L.C., Phoenix

By Stephen L. Crawford

Counsel for Petitioner

FILED 1-13-2022
STATE v. CROCKETT

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge D. Steven Williams, Judge David B. Gass, and Judge James 

B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIUM:

¶1 Petitioner Charles Taylor Crockett seeks review of the 

superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s latest successive petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. The petitioner has failed to show an abuse of discretion.

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, this court grants review but denies 

relief.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-23-00222-CR 

 

CHRISTIAN ANGEL ZUBIA, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 222nd District Court 

Deaf Smith County, Texas 

Trial Court No. CR-2022I-141, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding 

March 27, 2024 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Christian Angel Zubia appealed his conviction for murder and sentence. His brief 

was originally due January 17, 2024, but we granted his retained counsel, Charles 

Blevins, an extension to February 16, 2024. Counsel filed no brief on behalf of appellant. 

By letter dated February 26, 2024, we admonished Blevins that the failure to file a brief 

by March 7 would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial 

court for further proceedings. In response, counsel filed a “Letter of Intent to Dismiss 

Appeal” on March 7, 2024 and represented therein that appellant intended to file a motion 
2

to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. To date, however, we have received neither a motion 

to dismiss nor an appellant’s brief. 

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall 

determine the following:

(1) whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

(2) whether appellant is indigent;

(3) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on appellant’s behalf;

(4) whether appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;

(5) whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of 

counsel;

(6) whether new counsel should be appointed; and

(7) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date on which the 

appellant’s brief will be filed.

The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 26, 2024. 

If it is determined that appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has 

been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new 

counsel; the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of 

any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
3

Should appellant’s counsel file either a brief or a motion to voluntarily dismiss the 

appeal before April 12, 2024, he is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the 

filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 10.20

                            BUFFALO WILD WINGS, INC.

              EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
                              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008


The base salaries for the Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. executive officers for fiscal
year 2008 are set forth below. In addition, the executive officers participate
in our 401(k) plan and medical and disability plans, as well as other
compensatory plans, contracts and arrangements which are filed as exhibits to
our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2007.


      Executive Officer and Title                     2008 Annual Base Salary
      ---------------------------                     -----------------------

      Sally J. Smith                                        $535,000
        Chief Executive Officer and President

      Mary J. Twinem                                        $335,000
        Executive Vice President, Chief
        Financial Officer and Treasurer

      James M. Schmidt                                      $270,000
        Executive Vice President,
        General Counsel and Secretary

      Judith A. Shoulak                                     $270,000
        Senior Vice President, Operations

      Kathleen M. Benning                                   $243,000
         Senior Vice President, Marketing and
         Brand Development

      Linda G. Traylor                                      $243,000
        Senior Vice President, Human Resources

      Mounir N. Sawda                                       $227,000
        Senior Vice President, Franchise and
        Development
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,921
<SECURITIES>                                   169,291
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,819
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,249
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,921
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,918
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2743 

To suspend temporarily the duty on knitted or crocheted fabrics of a width 

exceeding 30 cm, containing by weight 5 percent or more of elastomeric 

yarn but not containing rubber thread. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on knitted or crocheted 

fabrics of a width exceeding 30 cm, containing by weight 

5 percent or more of elastomeric yarn but not containing 

rubber thread. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KNITTED OR CROCHETED FABRICS OF A WIDTH 

4 EXCEEDING 30 CM, CONTAINING BY WEIGHT 5 

5 PERCENT OR MORE OF ELASTOMERIC YARN 

6 BUT NOT CONTAINING RUBBER THREAD. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2743 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Knitted or crocheted fabrics of a width exceeding 

30 cm, containing by 

weight 5 percent or more 

of elastomeric yarn but not 

containing rubber thread 

(provided for in subheading 6004.10.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00734
- CV

In re Jerel Smith

OR I GINAL PROCEEDING FRO M TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Jerel Smith, an i nmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has
f iled a pro se petition for writ of mandamus directed to Margaret Moore, the District At t orney of
Tra v is County, Texas. See Tex. Gov ’ t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.

This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over a d istrict a ttorney. S ee In
re Jones , No

. 06

- 03

- 00061

- CV, 2003 WL 1985247, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana Apr. 30, 2003, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op., not designated for publication) ; R oberts v. Lowry , 742 S.W.2d 747, 749 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, no writ)

. By s tatute, t his Court has the authority to issue a writ of ma nd amus against “ a judge of a district , st atutory county, st atutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district” and other writs as nece ssary to enforce our appellate jurisdi ction

. See T ex. Gov ’ t Code § 22.221. Thus, t he D istrict Attorney of Travis County is not a party aga inst whom we may issue a writ of mandamus unless necessary to enforce ou r jurisdiction

. R elator has not demonstrated that our jurisdiction is implicated here

. We hav e no jurisdiction to grant r elator the relief he seeks.2 Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for w ant of jurisdiction

.

____________ ______________________________ Melissa Goodwin , Justice Before Justices Goodwin , Ba ker, and Kelly Filed: Novembe r 19, 2019
Exhibit
31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 I, Lori
A. Jones, certify that:
 
 1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Analytical Surveys,
Inc.;
 
 2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)           Disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Dated: February 8, 2008
 
 /s/ Lori A.
Jones
 Lori A.
Jones
 Chief
Executive Officer