alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* 

c 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

bfr. B. T. Walter8 

COUIltJ AUditOr, hith COUnty 

Tyler, Taxaa 

. . 

Dear Birl 

.Tour 1etta 

rsooa8ld8r8tloa of 6p 

81 quortlon r86ardlng 

8uppotb or tin Taxa8 Dd*a 

atteatlon. 

, row8 la? ne oaf 

#Idry an additloaoountr fund8 ror the 

reoeirod oar oar8rul 

City-COuBtJ ah 

that th8 rti8 

had baen expand 

a l a k aa ttm Op inio0S n 

M t.î y o u wer e 8nU8lClitlnlt and tha 

8 0r oount Y moaev , 

for thair 8up9ort. 

Tour letter of 

quartion 

hu Tama Dafaue Otmrd. 

~,war8.anolllary to tb8 main point of the4 dpbion. ~oratwor, 

-;,aCt8r ro8aaroh and ooasoltation with.mmberr of tha Haal+h 

.h&dtlWBt, ~8 find that the fast8 i%or'bo+~'@ 418 wara sot borbi0 u8 WhOB w8 wrota Oplalon No. O-4905. tar tb8e rea8on8, 

We arm withdrawlry our original ~Opialoa 0-5494, rendered on 

.fhptmrber P, 1945, ana w* rhall not ln thla oplalon pa88 upon 
the 1ogalit.y of the City-County Health Unit or the City-County 

welfare Unit. E YOU dOair Our 8pCifiO OpiIliOIl UpOn their 

legality, we ahall be glad to go into that matter anew. 

The rOuOWing 8tatUt88 8.r. pertinent to the qU88- 

tloa pnaentod in your lettensor July Blth, Auguet 19th and 

tiaptembar 3rdr 

l * l l a nd the c OmJII.i88iOM r 8 COtAr t Or a 4 

o o ua ty may appmprlata fUnda rr0r it8 general funda, 

or any other 8vailabl8 fund, for th8 abniaiatration 

of 8Uoh Colmty Child W8Uan &8rd8 and provide fOZ 

88nio88 to and support of ohildran in ased Of protactloa and/or oar*." (8oottoa co, ~tlol.8 696f1, 

Y.A.C.S.) 

ì* l + The Co ztdsa lo a er 8 Court o f a ny c o unty 

8hall her8 tlm authority to l ppropriata mnd expend 

maef r-r th8 gan8ralraranura of It8 Oouaty ror 

aad In behalf of pub110 health aad l aaltatloa within 

it.8 COlUlt~.î (Al%018 til8f. V.A.C.8) 

.* l l provided further that County COQd8- 

8iOMr8 COWt8 Oity authoritier, qorPaarniti@8, aad 

olrlo and patrfotlo orgutlratlom l ra ompoworod and 

authorlrrd by thl8 Aot to prOVid8 rUIid8, araorlea, 

eQu.lpmant, matorlal, traaaportatloa, or other a 

8 

- 

proprInt* 8enloo8 or raoilltlea, to th8 Tats8 l - 

181110 otUrd." (Seotloa 4. Artiol.8 589la. V,A.C.S,) 

X. hare b8.n unable to find that th8 hgi8~tlWO ha8 

mud. prOVi8iOa for tin audit of the88 fund8 after tbay hare boon 

given t0 the88 OrgaiIi8afiOn8 by tha OOIEmi88iOner8' OOPTt. W8 

think, howarar, It a naoeraary lmplloatlon of tim power granted 

to glva fund8 that th87 m8y bo glV8n PPOB oondltlon. 

Wa, therorore, 8dVi88 YOU that it lie8 WithiB tha 

diaoretloa Of th8 OOIlUBi88iOIl~r8' court to provide by order duly 
entered that all rurrd8 appropriated by it ypder guthorlty of 

Ul8f aad SSQla, Vernon'8 hnno%i~ed~tlill .jtatubes, 

~$i'$%'$n COnditiOa that the proper O$ri,O$ pf t+e reQ$p: 

lent agenay 8ubmit p8riOdlOal1y, a8 the Codt' 9 epiikd, a 

gtateaent aooountlng ror th8 ~80 0r the runda &van. 

Your8 very truly 

A88i8taBt
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Cambridge Advantaged Properties Limited Partnership and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000748847
<NAME>                   Cambridge Advantaged Properties Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>             1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-25-1997
<CASH>                                          16,450,039
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,553,692
<PP&E>                                         192,128,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,878,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,253,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,187,011
<BONDS>                                        221,619,591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (103,552,726)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,253,876
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,610,571
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,332,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,593,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,643,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 26,959,248
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,643,363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1,925
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

DESIGNATION OF CHAIR AND VICECHAIR OF THE MINOR JUDICIARY 

EDUCATION BOARD

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 465

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

 ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2022, Magisterial District Judge Richard G. King is 

hereby designated as Chair, and Magisterial District Judge Douglas McCall Bell is 

designated as Vice-Chair, of the Minor Judiciary Education Board, commencing July 1, 

2022.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ricardo Bernardes, in my capacity as the Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on April 25, 2008 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the
information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.

Dated: April 25, 2008



By:

/s/ RICARDO BERNARDESRicardo BernardesExecutive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Letter Agreement (Warrant), dated October 4, 2001



 Exhibit 10.21 
 Eyeblaster Ltd. 
 7 Zarchin Street 
 Ra’anana
Israel 43100 
  

	Re:	Grant of Options/Waiver of Claims 

 Gentlemen: 
 I, Ofer Zadikario, hereby acknowledge and confirm as follows: 
  

	 	1.	In my capacity as an employee of Eyeblaster Ltd. (the “Company”), the Company has paid to me (or, with respect to managerial insurance and continuing education payments,
to a fund established in my benefit) the amounts set forth in Exhibit A (the “Consideration”) as payment of my salary, social and other benefits in consideration of the performance of my duties for the company during the period,
since I start working for the Company, commencing 1 September, 1999 and ending 31 July, 2001 (the “Relevant Period”). 

  

	 	2.	I agree that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Employment Agreement between the Company and the undersigned, dated 1 September, 1999 (the
“Employment Agreement”), the payment of the Consideration represents payment in full of the salary and social benefits for the Relevant Period. 

  

	 	3.	In consideration of my agreement to waive any demands or claims of additional compensation to which I was entitled under the Employment Agreement, eyeblaster, Inc. shall grant to
me, or to any person or entity designated by me, options to purchase 38,414 shares of Common Stock of the eyeblaster, Inc., par value $0.001 (the “Options”). The Options shall be exercisable at any time following 10 years from the grant
thereof, at an exercise price equal to the par value of the shares underlying the Options ($0.001). 









	 	4.	In light of Eyeblaster, Inc.’s undertaking to grant the Options herein, I hereby irrevocably waive any and all present and future claims and demands with respect to
the level of my compensation from the Company, including claims of withheld wages, for the Relevant Period, and release the Company, its directors, officers and employees from any claims or demands in connection therewith.


  

							
	Signed:	  		  	
			
	 /s/ Ofer Zadikario
	  		  	
	Name:	 	Ofer Zadikario	  		  	
	Date:	 	23/9/2001	  		  	

 Accepted and agreed, 
 Eyeblaster, Ltd. 
  

							
	By:	 	 /s/ Gal Trifon
	  		  	
	Title:	 	CEO	  		  	
	Date:	 	Oct. 4, 2001	  		  	

 In light of the waiver of claims contained herein, Eyeblaster, Inc, hereby undertakes to issue to
Ofer Zadikario, or to any person or entity designated by him, options to purchase 38,414 shares of Common Stock of the Company, par value $0.001, exercisable on the terms described in Section 3 above, in accordance with the terms and conditions
of a Stock Option Plan to be approved by the Board of Directors of the Company. 
 Eyeblaster, Inc. 
  

							
	By:	 	 /s/ Gal Trifon
	  		  	
	Title:	 	CEO	  		  	
	Date:	 	Oct. 4, 2001	  		  	

  

 2
Rafael VAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2691

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2781 

To suspend temporarily the duty on water-dispersible polyisocyanate products 

based on hexamethylene diisocyanate trimer and cyclohexanamine, N,Ndimethyl-, compounds with 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acidblocked 1,6-diisocyanatohexane homopolymer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on water-dispersible 

polyisocyanate products based on hexamethylene 

diisocyanate trimer and cyclohexanamine, N,N-dimethyl- 

, compounds with 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic 

acid-blocked 1,6-diisocyanatohexane homopolymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2781 IS

1 SECTION 1. WATER-DISPERSIBLE POLYISOCYANATE PROD2 UCTS BASED ON HEXAMETHYLENE 

3 DIISOCYANATE TRIMER AND 

4 CYCLOHEXANAMINE, N,N-DIMETHYL-, COM5 POUNDS WITH 3-(CYCLOHEXYLAMINO)-1- 

6 PROPANESULFONIC ACID-BLOCKED 1,6- 

7 DIISOCYANATOHEXANE HOMOPOLYMER. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

9 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

10 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

11 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Water-dispersible 

polyisocyanate products based 

on hexamethylene 

diisocyanate (HDI) trimer 

(CAS No. 28182–81–2) and 

cyclohexanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, compounds with 3- 

(cyclohexylamino)-1- 

propanesulfonic acid-blocked 

1,6-diisocyanatohexane 

homopolymer (CAS No. 

666723–27–9) (provided for 

in subheading 3911.90.90) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

14 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

15 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000753557
<NAME>                        LBO Capital Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         48
<SECURITIES>                               38,353    
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           38,353    
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             38,401     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     599,756     
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    1,210   
<OTHER-SE>                               (562,564)     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               38,401
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         13,151   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,041)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        



</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00127-CV

Rebecca R. Gonzalez

v.

Mauro L. Reyna III

On Appeal from the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-1682-09-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 2, 2015
Kurt L. HUDSON, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee FOR J.P. MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST 2006-WF1; Emilio Valls, Teresita Valls, United States of America, Acropolis Property Maintenance, Inc., McCormick Power, Inc., Hugins Construction Corp., AK Construction & Remodeling, Inc, Glo Tel, Inc., and Hillsboro Lebaron Condominium Apartments, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D17-1177

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2018]

Kurt L. Hudson, Chicago, IL, pro se.

Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and M. Hope Keating and Karusha Y. Sharpe of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee U.S. Bank National Association.

Per Curiam.

*35This is an appeal of a final judgment of mortgage foreclosure. While appellant was the original mortgagor, appellant lost the property in a foreclosure action by his condominium association for unpaid condominium assessments. He was joined in the appellee bank's foreclosure complaint because he was the maker of the note. The only relief the bank sought was foreclosure of the mortgage and a deficiency if the proceeds of sale were insufficient to cover the mortgage. Only the request for deficiency constituted a request for relief against appellant, as appellant's interest in the property had already been foreclosed. The appellant raised several affirmative defenses, but we conclude that they did not establish meritorious defenses to the foreclosure after he was no longer the owner of the property. Appellant did allege that Wells Fargo collected fraudulent monthly inspection fees and late charges, which he paid, but which violated the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C., section 1961, and related state laws. If his defense is meritorious, it is a claim which is personal to him which he can assert as a set-off against any claim for a deficiency judgment.

For these reasons we affirm the final judgment of foreclosure.

Warner, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4801



# 
S HIRLEY J. B OONE ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-00-356) Submitted: March 26, 2002 Decided: April 8, 2002 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Adam C. Rhea, JENKINS & RHEA, P.L.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Shirley J. Boone appeals her conviction and sentence imposed after a jury trial for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and todistribute cocaine, and two counts of possessing with intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a), (b)(1)(B)(ii), 846 (West 1999); 18 U.S.C.A. § 2 (West 2000). Finding no reversible error, we affirm. Boone contends on appeal that the evidence adduced at trial wasinsufficient to sustain a conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine under count two of her indictment. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, we find areasonable trier of fact could have found Boone guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). Boone next contends her indictment lacked specificity and was thus fatally deficient. Boone’s objection to the specificity of the indictment is waived by her failure to properly raise it in the trial court. Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2), (f).Accordingly, we affirm Boone’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B OONE
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, James C. Mroczkowski, Chief Financial Officer of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
 
 (1) The Quarterly Report of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.
 
 
 /s/ James C. Mroczkowski
-------------------------------------------
Name: James C. Mroczkowski
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Nicolas V. Chater, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-S Security Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)), except that the Periodic Report does not contain the separate audited financial statements of Army Fleet Support,
LLC for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, as required by Form 10-K and Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X ; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 30, 2009



/s/ Nicolas V. ChaterNicolas V. Chater,Chief Financial Officer