alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18234-18235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the

[[Page 18235]]

Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve 
Bank indicated. The applications also will be available for inspection 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may 
express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC 
Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition 
of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the 
acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in 
section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 15, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. A.N.B. Holding Company, Ltd., Terrell, Texas, to aquire up to an 
additional 35 percent of the voting shares of The ANB Corporation, and 
thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of American 
National Bank, both of Terrell, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 15, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-9026 Filed 4-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge 

Alexander Curren 

Gibson & Kuehn 

Nye County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
#### Tracey TOLES, Appellant, v. COASTAL MART, INC.; Mark Thornburg, Appellees.

No. 03-2334.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 29, 2004.

Decided May 12, 2004.

Thomas Perry Frerichs, Freriehs Law Office, Waterloo, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Tracey Toles, Waterloo, IA, pro se.

Lora Lynne McCollom, Kerrie M. Plummer, Gonzalez & Saggio, West Des Moines, IA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tracey Toles appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her action brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Iowa Civil Rights Act. Toles sued her former employer, Coastal Mart, Inc., and its area manager, Mark Thornburg, claiming race discrimination. Having carefully reviewed the record, *see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman,*289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002), we affirm.

Specifically, we reject Toles’s argument that the district court erred by concluding *62defendants’ actions were insufficient to create a trialworthy hostile-work-environment claim, *see Burkett v. Glickman,*327 F.3d 658, 662 (8th Cir.2003) (for hostile-work-environment claim to succeed, alleged conduct must be so extreme as to change terms and conditions of employment); and we also reject her contention that the district court improperly declined to consider her retaliation claim, *see Speer v. Rand McNally & Co.,*123 F.3d 658, 665 (7th Cir.1997) (district court was well within its discretion not to permit plaintiff to proceed on new theory, raised first in summary judgment resistance, as discovery had ended and summary judgment ruling was pending). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation in the Northern District of Iowa.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2725 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thidiazuron. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thidiazuron. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THIDIAZURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 N-phenyl-N′-(1,2,3-thiadiazol5-yl)-urea (thidiazuron) (CAS 

No. 51707–55–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

2934.99.15) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2725 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7040
GEORGE JOYNER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus E. W. MURRAY; E. C. MORRIS; L. W. HUFFMAN; L. M. SAUNDERS; D. K. SMITH; B. W. SOLES; LOU DIXON; AMY WOOTEN; STANLEY JONES; LIEUTENANT ELDRIDGE; LIEUTENANT WILSON; SERGEANT TONEY;SERGEANT MANN; SERGEANT HUDDLESTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMITH, 8-4 Shift; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER AUSTIN; CAPTAIN SPEAS; LIE UTENANT YATES; SERGEANT TERRY; SERGEANT PHILLIPS; SERGEANT SMITH; E. O. TRENT; SERGEANT ELDRIDGE, 4-12 Shift; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WADDELL, 8-4 Shift; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LASCOLETTE, Defendants - Appellants, and MICHAEL A. SHUPE; NURSE DILLARD, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-583-R) Submitted: March 18, 1997 Decided: April 17, 19972 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order entering judgment for Appellee and awarding him damages in this action filed pursuant42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation as to the merits of Appellee's privacy claim and find no reversible error. We further find that the damages awarded did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Joyner v. Murray , No. CA-93-583-R (W.D. Va. May 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

d0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

140312

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140312 COA: 284844 Wayne CC: 07-020872-FC NATHAN WARD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 17, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Official Journal L 30/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 30 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 603 February 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 30

English edition

Legislation

Volume 603 February 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/170 of 30 January 2017 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for bifenthrin, carbetamide, cinidon-ethyl, fenpropimorph and triflusulfuron in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/171 of 30 January 2017 amending Annexes II, III and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for aminopyralid, azoxystrobin, cyantraniliprole, cyflufenamid, cyproconazole, diethofencarb, dithiocarbamates, fluazifop-P, fluopyram, haloxyfop, isofetamid, metalaxyl, prohexadione, propaquizafop, pyrimethanil, Trichoderma atroviride strain SC1 and zoxamide in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 45 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/170 of 30 January 2017 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for bifenthrin, carbetamide, cinidon-ethyl, fenpropimorph and triflusulfuron in or on certain products (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/171 of 30 January 2017 amending Annexes II, III and IV to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for aminopyralid, azoxystrobin, cyantraniliprole, cyflufenamid, cyproconazole, diethofencarb, dithiocarbamates, fluazifop-P, fluopyram, haloxyfop, isofetamid, metalaxyl, prohexadione, propaquizafop, pyrimethanil, Trichoderma atroviride strain SC1 and zoxamide in or on certain products (
  1
  )

Trichoderma atroviride

1

45

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit 10.9** **Annual    Incentive Bonus Program** **Performance    Criteria**     The following three performance criteria will be used in each    entity as measurements in the Annual Incentive Bonus Program.    Each performance criteria will be equally weighted in    determining overall performance.      •     Top Line Growth  §     Net Interest Income plus Fee Income      •     Adjusted Net Income  §     Net Income After Tax, before loan loss provision, after actual    net charge offs      •     Return on Equity **Targeted    Base Salary Percentage**     The targeted base salary percentage for bonus payment at three    possible achievement levels (Threshold, Target and Superior) for    each employment level within the Company shall be determined by    the FBFS Board, acting upon the recommendation of the    Compensation Committee. If targeted percentages for any    employment level shall be based on a range, then the percentage    for each participating individual within such level shall be    determined by the Compensation Committee or management, as    appropriate. The targeted base salary percentages for each    participating individual shall be promptly communicated to such    individual. **Mix of    the Payout**            **Corporate**  **Entity**      FBFS Employees      100    %      n/a     Other Employees      25    %      75    % **Safeguards**     The Adjusted Net Income percentage is self-funding.     The Net Income after Tax must meet or exceed the aggregate bonus    payment. **Eligibility**     Employees must work a minimum of 30 hours per week to    qualify for the bonus program. Employees must be hired by    October 1 of any year the plan is in effect to be eligible for    the Bonus Program. All employees must be employed on the date of    payout to receive their bonus.     If an employee is promoted before October 1 of any year the plan    is in effect, then that employee will be eligible for the bonus    percentage that is commensurate with their new position for that    year.     Approved: March 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                       111
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,586
<PP&E>                                          18,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,617
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,344
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,563
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (230)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,870
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10


</TABLE>
Exhibit 12
 December 26.
    
    
    December 20.
    
    
    December 21.
    
    
    December 23.
    
    
    December 24.2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006($ in thousands)Earnings:(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    
    $
    (46,299
    )
    
    $
    (15,818
    )
    
    $
    6,200
    
    
    $
    10,851
    
    
    $
    47,025Fixed charges
    
    
    76,127
    
    
    
    72,837
    
    
    
    75,467
    
    
    
    75,381
    
    
    
    71,107Earnings from continuing operations, adjusted
    
    $
    29,828
    
    
    $
    57,019
    
    
    $
    81,667
    
    
    $
    86,232
    
    
    $
    118,132Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.08x
    
    
    
    1.14x
    
    
    
    1.66xFixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    40,117
    
    
    $
    38,036
    
    
    $
    39,923
    
    
    $
    43,567
    
    
    $
    47,491Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    35,414
    
    
    
    34,375
    
    
    
    35,267
    
    
    
    31,814
    
    
    
    23,616Capitalized interest
    
    
    596
    
    
    
    426
    
    
    
    277
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total fixed charges
    
    $
    76,127
    
    
    $
    72,837
    
    
    $
    75,467
    
    
    $
    75,381
    
    
    $
    71,107
EXHIBIT 32.1



The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Royal Financial, Inc. on
the basis of such officers knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of Royal Financial, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2005, (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|September 23, 2005 |  | /s/ Donald A. Moll                               
|                   |  | Donald A. Moll                                   
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                   | 
|September 23, 2005 |  | /s/ Neil Brodzinski                              
|                   |  | Neil Brodzinski                                  
|                   |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies the Report and shall not be treated as
having been filed as part of this Report.
E OWNEY GENERAL 

TEXAS 

Aus-rriu aa. TEXAS 

January 27, 1965 

Honorable Jules Damiani, Jr. Opinion No. c-381 

Criminal District Attorney 

County Courthouse Re: Control of property 

Galveston, Texas leases owned by a city 

subsequent to the dissolution of the corporate existence of such 

Dear Mr. Damiani: city. 

A certain city seeks to abolish its corporate existence by following the procedure outlined in Article 1243, 

Vernon's Civil Statutes. In connection therewith, you request our opinion as to who will exercise control, after 

dissolution of the corporation, of certain water front 

property leases heretofore entered Into by the city with 

the property owners. 

In our opinion, control of such leases will vest in 

the County Commissioners Court under the terms of Article 

1260, Vernon's Civil Statutes, which reads as follows: 

"When any corporation is abolished under 

the provisions of this chapter (which chapter 

includes Article 1243, supra), and shall at 

the time of any such abolishment own any 

public buildings, public parks, public works 

or other property, and the same shall not 

have been sold or disposed of as provided 

in this chapter, the same shall be managed 

and controlled by the commissioners court of 

such county for the purpose to which same 

were originally used and intended; and, for 

this purpose, the commissioners court shall 

have and exercise, with reference thereto, 

the powers originally conferred by charter 

upon the mayor and aldermen of such ,city." 

-1808- 
Hon. Jules Damiani, Jr., page 2 (c-381) 

Should there be any indebtedness outstanding at the 

time of such corporate dissolution, your attention Is 

directed to Articles 1244-5, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, 

which authorize a receiver to take charge of the corporate 

property under certain circumstances, and to Article 1262, 

Vernon’s Civil Statutes, which authorizes city officials 

holding office at the time of dissolution, or in event of 

their failure to act, authorizing certain court appointed 

trustees, to take charge of the corporate property. 

SUMMARY 

Control of water front property leases 

owned by a city whose corporate existence 

is abolished under the procedure outlined 

in Article 1243, V.C.S., passes upon such 

abolition to the County Commissioners Court 

under the provisions of Article 1260, V.C.S. 

In event there is outstanding Indebtedness 

at the time of such dissolution, attention 

is directed to Articles 1244-5 and 1262, 

V.C.S. 4 authorizing other parties to take 

charge of the corporate property under 

certain circumstances. 

Yours very truly, 

WAGGONER CARR 

Attorney General of Texas 

JAS: afg/dm 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMI’IT~ 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Milton Richardson 

Pat Bailey 

Harold Kennedy 

Ben Harrison 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

By: Stanton Stone 

-1809-
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132451 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132451 COA: 269028 Wayne CC: 96-503266 ROBERT H. BURROW, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 25, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 4, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CT Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven B. Solomon,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Steven B. Solomon
---------------------
Steven B. Solomon
Chief Executive Officer

August 19, 2002


                                       38
<PAGE>