alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRESENTATION F

EPA PVC MACT 

Meeting

November 23, 2009
 Shin-Etsu Chemical - Shintech’s 

Parent Company

 PVC Capacity and Market Summ Technology overview Shintech’s history Process discussion PVC MACT testing request
 SHINTECH - wholly owned subsidiary of SHIN-ETSU Chemical  SHIN-ETSU Group (As of March 31, 2008)

1) $13.7 Billion Global Sales(JPY100 = US$1.00)2) 20,241 Employees, production bases in 16 countries

 Major Product and Market Positions

World Wide

PVC(Polyvinyl Chloride) 1Silicon Wafers 1Cellulose Derivatives 1Silicones 4 (No.1 in Japan)Synthetic Quartz Glass 1 (for photomasks)Rare Earth Magnets 1 (for hard disc drive

SHIN-ETSU AND ITS GROUP
SHINTECH GLOBAL PVC

TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT

SHINTECH

TS+QC

TX & LA

SHIN-ETSU

PVC R&D CENTER

KASHIMA, JAPAN

C.I.R.E.S.

TS + QC

ESTARREJA,

PORTUGAL

SHIN-ETSU PVC EUROPE

TS+QC

NETHERLANDS

SHIN-ETSU

KASHIMA, JAPAN

CU

SHIN-ETSU

POLYMER

PILOT PLANT & PROCESS EQUIPMENT
SHIN-ETSU GROUP PVC WORLD CAPACI

 SHINTECH U.S.A. 

• Freeport, Texas : 3,200 MM LBS per yea• Louisiana (before expansion) : 1,300 MM LBS per yea

(after expansion) 2,600 MM LBS per yea

 SHIN-ETSU JAPAN : 1,210 MM LBS per yea CIRES PORTUGAL : 440 MM LBS per yea SHIN-ETSU PVC NETHERLANDS

: 990 MM LBS per yea

 Total PVC Production Capacity : 8,440 MM LBS per 

(after expansion) (approx. 4 million Tons)
CHANGE IN THE CAPACITY IN THE USA (M

2009

Shintech 5,800 (35%)Oxyvinyl 3,653 (22%)Georgia Gulf 2,653 (16%)Formosa 2,524 (15%)Westlake 1,526 (9%)Certainteed 481 (3%)Dispersion/Copolymer 655 (4%)

17,292
Shintech uses the state-of-the-art PVC pro

technology developed by Shin-Etsu

 Shin-Etsu technology

- is used for about 18% of world’s PVC resin prod- is adopted by 12 International Licensees worldw

 Precision PVC resin through computer control Consistency from large reactors Quality from anti-fouling reactor design ISO 9001 and 14001 standards certified
SHINTECH

 Brief History

1974 Freeport Plant start-up2000 Addis Plant start-up2008 Plaquemine Chlor-Alkali/VCM/PVC plants start up

 Operation Outline

Corporate office -Houston, TXPlant Location -Freeport, TX / about 800 Acres(3.1 million)

- Addis, LA / about 1,200 Acres(4.8 million)- Plaquemine, LA/ about 3,100 Acres (12.6 mi

Facility - 3 Independent PVC Production P

Total PVC Capacity (Jan ’07) - 5,200 Million lbs/yr (2 million MT) Employees (Apr ’07) - 453

PVC MACT Testing Plan Prop

 Shintech has proposed to utilize th

results from one site as the representative data for all three si

 The uniform technology used thro

each site provides a redundancy e

 The proposed production grade is 

majority of product manufactured

 The only difference among the sit

production scale
steam_record - Re: FW: JEA Brandy Branch Generating Station ICR Extension Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date. 

Sincerely, 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Davis, Brian C. - Manager, Electric Production-CTs" <DaviBC@jea.com>

Date: 7/15/2010 4:28 PM

Subject: Re: FW: JEA Brandy Branch Generating Station ICR Extension Request

Attachments: ICR_Extension_Request1.docx

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3F3736DO... 8/24/2011
steam_record - Re: ICR extension request letter 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric 

effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be 

evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension 

request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until 

EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date. 

Sincerely, 

-----"Foreman, Karen T." <ForeKT@jea.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Foreman, Karen T." <ForeKT@jea.com> 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Foreman, Karen T." <ForeKT@jea.com>

Date: 7/16/2010 10:48 AM

Subject: Re: ICR extension request letter

Attachments: ICR extension letter.pdf

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C403919DO... 8/24/2011
Date: 07/16/2010 08:23AM 

cc: "Holbrooks, Kevin E. - Director, Compliance" <HolbKE@jea.com>, "Lucas, Robert J. - 

Manager, Process Chemistry" <LucaRJ@jea.com>, "Cordova, Ed D." <corded@jea.com> 

Subject: ICR extension request letter 

Ms. Alicea, 

 

Please find attached an extension request letter for the EPA Information Collection Request for 

JEA’s Northside Generating Station. I will also send you the hard copy in the mail. 

 

Thank you, 

 

Karen Foreman 

Environmental Coordinator 

Northside Generating Station 

office: 665-4795 

cell: 591-9232 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------- 

Florida has a very broad Public Records Law. Virtually all 

written communications to or from State and Local Officials and 

employees are public records available to the public and media 

upon request. JEA does not differentiate between personal and 

business e-mails. E-mail sent on the JEA system will be 

considered public and will only be withheld from disclosure if 

deemed confidential pursuant to State Law. Under Florida law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, 

do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact JEA 

by phone or in writing. 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C403919DO... 8/24/2011
ex10_31.htm


    
      

    

    
       

      EXHIBIT
10.31

      


      


      AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT

      (President
and Chief Operating Officer)

      


      This
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement (this “Amendment”) is
entered into this 21st day of
February, 2008, by and between OrthoLogic Corp., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and
Randolph C. Steer (“Executive”) and
amends the Agreement dated as of May 12, 2006 by and between the Company and
Executive (the “Agreement”).

       

      The
Agreement is hereby modified and amended as follows:

       

      1.           Change of Control
Termination Payments.  With respect to the Company’s payment
obligations provided for in Section 3(b) of the Agreement if termination of the
Agreement by the Company without cause follows or is in connection with a Change
of Control (as defined in the Agreement), the term of such payment obligations
shall be extended from six months to twelve months from the date of
termination.

       

      Except as
expressly amended and modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.  In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the
terms and provisions of the Agreement and the terms and provisions of this
Amendment, the terms and provisions of this Amendment shall govern and
control.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, when taken together, shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

       

      This
Amendment No. 1 is executed as of the date first above written.

       

       

      
        	
                ORTHOLOGIC
      CORP.

              	 
      	
                EXECUTIVE

              
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
                /s/ John M. Holliman

              	 
      	
                /s/ Randolph C. Steer

              
	
                John
      M. Holliman, III

              	 
      	
                Randolph
      C. Steer, MD, Ph.D.

              
	
                Executive
      Chairman
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     Nov-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          Aug-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    162,997
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             723,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                              105,889
<INVENTORY>                                                39,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,240,342
<PP&E>                                                    687,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                            565,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          2,621,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,380,598
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                             2,216,668
<COMMON>                                                    3,874
<OTHER-SE>                                            (1,619,445)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            2,621,602
<SALES>                                                   666,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,874,399
<CGS>                                                     694,350
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           4,531,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        1,832,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         38,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (756,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (756,833)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (756,833)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.20)



</TABLE>
NO. 07-06-0210-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B JULY 27, 2006

______________________________ LESLIE C. CHEW , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 364 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2006-411688; H ONORABLE BRAD LEY S. UND ERWOOD, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION
Pursuant to a plea of guilt

y, appellant

Leslie C. C hew

was conv icted of theft, in an amount less than $1,500, enhanced by tw o prior conv ictions, and pun ishment was assessed at 18 months incar ceration in a state jail facility. Proceed ing pro se , appellant filed notice of appeal challengi ng the conv iction.
We have recei ved a certi fication of rig ht of appeal by which the trial court certified that the underly ing case w as a plea-barg ain case w ith no rig ht of appeal. By letter, dated June 1, 2006, this C ourt notified appel lant that the cer tification indi cated that he had no1 Appellant did file a lett er with this Court requesting that the appeal be continued. However, thi s le tter

fail s to ide ntif

y any appella te issues r

elating to matters that were rai sed by written motion filed and ru led on before trial nor did it i dentify any efforts by the appellant to obtai n the trial court’s permi ssion to appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)(2). A pr o se def endant is held to the sam e standard as any attorney who represents a defendant. See Johnson v. St ate , 760 S.W .2d 277, 279 (Tex.Crim.App . 1988). 2 right of appeal. In this

letter, w e further notified appellant that t he appeal was subj ect to dismissal unless he provided t his Court w ith an amended cert ification prov iding that h e has the right of appeal or otherw ise demonstrates that there ex ists other

grounds for continuing the a ppeal b y June 16, 2006. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)(2) , (d); Stowe v . State , 124 S.W.3d 228, 232 (Tex.App.–El Paso 2003, no pet.). No amende d certificati on reflecting
a right to appeal has been filed and appellant has failed to demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal. 1 Therefore, the appeal i s dismissed.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Do not publish

.
Exhibit   32.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT  TOSECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of COMC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as  adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Marc Dell’Immagine,  Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, that to  the best of my knowledge:

| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    |   | The information contained      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |

| /s/ Marc Dell’Immagine                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Marc Dell’Immagine                    |   |
| Controller and Principal      Accounting Officer |   |
| August 19, 2004                                  |   |

 

_______________________

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO COMC, INC. AND  WILL BE RETAINED BY COMC, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE  COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 49467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19746]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New York Advisory 
Committee; Correction

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the 
Federal Register of August 2, 2013, concerning a meeting of the New 
York Advisory Committee. The notice contained incorrect dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivy Davis, (202) 376-7533.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of August 2, 2013, in FR Doc. 2013-18587, 
on page 46921, correct the first paragraph to read:

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules 
and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning 
meeting of the New York Advisory Committee to the Commission will 
convene at 12:00 p.m. (ET) on Wednesday, August 14, 2013, at the Law 
Offices of Sullivan and Cromwell, 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New 
York. The purpose of the meeting is for orientation and project 
planning.

    Dated: August 9, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-19746 Filed 8-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
A.H.F., a Child, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-1148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 27, 2018

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, Orlando, and Assistant Public Defender, Stephanie Nicole Osman, Orlando, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the March 2, 2018 dispositions and sentences rendered in Case Nos. CJ17-3799-O and CJ17-3979-O, in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Order filed, December 02, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00926

- CR

____________ RIKU MELARTIN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1444950



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due November 26, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because th e reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Pamela Knobloch , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Correction; Announcement of Withdrawal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration.

ACTION: Correction; Announcement of Withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published an 
announcement in the Federal Register on October 24, 2008, requesting 
review of a proposed amendment to the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) 
submitted for Gulfport Biloxi International Airport, Gulfport MS. The 
proposed amendment to the Noise Compatibility Program was to be 
approved or disapproved on or before April 16, 2009. Public comments 
were to be submitted by December 16, 2008 to the address below. No 
amendment to NCP was received therefore, neither FAA review or public 
comment will be required. This Notice was published in error and is 
being withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Morgan, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross 
Street, Jackson, Mississippi 39208, 601 664-9891.

    Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on April 13, 2009.
Rans Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. E9-8867 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DA 14 - 0463



### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 20 15 MT 234N DEAN WARD,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ENERGY WEST, INC., and DOES 1 - 4,

Defendants and Appellees. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eighth Judicial District,

In and For the County

of Cascade, Cause No. DDV 13 - 200 Honorable Di

rk M. Sandefur, Presiding Judge COUNSEL OF RECORD:

For Appellant: John E. Seidlitz, Jr., Seidlit z Law Office, Great Falls, Montana For A ppellee : Oliver H. Goe, Kimberly A. Beatty, Christy S. McCann, Browning, Kaleczyc, Berry

& Hoven, P.C., Helena , Montana

Submitted on Briefs: June 10, 2015

Decided: August 11, 2015 Filed:

__________________________________________ Clerk August 11 2015

Case Number: DA 14-04632

Justice Beth Baker delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating Rules, this case is decided by me morandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not serve as precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this Court’s quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacifi c Reporter and Montana Reports. ¶2 Between January and October 2012, Dean Ward was employed as a chief information officer. The parties dispute whether Ward was employed by Energy West, Inc., or by Energy West’s parent company, Gas Natural, Inc. Ward worked primarily in Ohio and, after his em ployment was terminated, he applied for and received unemployment benefits from that state. Ward then filed suit against Energy West in Montana’s Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, alleging wrongful discharge in violation of § 39 - 2 - 901, MCA, of the Montana Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act (WDEA), and negligent infliction of emotional distress. On Energy West’s motion, the District Court, after determining that Ohio law governs Ward’s claims, dismissed Ward’s action for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction. Ward appeals the dismissal. ¶3 This appeal concerns substantially similar facts and issues as Harrington v. Energy West, Inc. , 2015 MT 233 , ___ Mont. ___, ___ P.3d ___. As in that case, we conclude here that, under § 28 - 3 - 102, MCA, Ohio law governs Ward’s WDEA claim. However, this conclusion does not deprive the District C ourt of subject- matter jurisdiction. We thus3

vacate the District Court’s dismissal and remand for further proceedings to determine whether dismis sal is appropriate under the doctrine of forum non convenien s. ¶4 We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c) of our Internal Operating Rules, which provides for me morandum opinions. In the opinion of the Court, Harrington re solves the issues on appeal . The District Court’s order of dismissal is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings . /S/ BETH BAKER We concur: /S/ MIKE McGRATH /S/ MICHAEL E WHEAT /S/ LAURIE McKINNON /S/ JIM RICE
f10q0911ex4ii_neonode.htm


EXHIBIT 4.2







NEONODE INC.







CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS


OF


SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK












Pursuant to Section 151(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, Neonode Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify:







WHEREAS, the Corporation does here certify that a Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights of Series A and Series B Preferred Stock was executed, acknowledged, and filed by the Corporation on December 30, 2008.







WHEREAS, the Corporation does here certify that pursuant to the authority conferred upon the Board of Directors of the Corporation by the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, the Board of Directors of the Corporation on January 2, 2009 duly adopted the following resolutions increasing the number of authorized shares of Series B Preferred Stock of the Corporation, and that such resolutions have not been modified and are in full force and effect on the date hereof:







RESOLVED, to increase the number of authorized shares of Series B Preferred Stock of the Corporation from 100,934 shares to 102,690 shares.







FURTHER RESOLVED, that the directors and officers of the Corporation be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and empowered on behalf of the Corporation to execute, verify, and file a certificate of designations in accordance with Delaware law.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Designations to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 2 day of January, 2009.







 




	 	NEONODE INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ David W. Brunton	 
	 	Name:	David W. Brunton	 
	 	Title:	CFO