alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daryl J. Ehrmantraut, the Chief Executive Officer of Quantum
Solar Power Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                 

| | By:    | */s/ Daryl J. Ehrmantraut*           
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | DARYL J. EHRMANTRAUT                 
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | September 13, 2010                   
| |        |                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
UNSCANNABLE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DMS DOCKET

DMS Docket Number: FAA-2009-0082

Directorate Identifier: 2008-NE-42-AD

Name/ Description of Unscannable Item

Rolls-Royce Corporation Service Bulletin AE 2100J-A-72-071, Revision 1, dated 

February 18, 2008

Rolls-Royce Corporation Service Bulletin AE 2100D2-A-72-073, Revision 1, dated 

February 18, 2008

Rolls-Royce Corporation Service Bulletin AE 2100D3-A-72-256, Revision 1, dated 

February 18, 2008

________________________________________________________________

SERVICE INFORMATION MAY BE EXAMINED AT:

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202 741 6030; or go to:

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html

or

Federal Aviation Administration

New England Region

Office of the Regional Counsel

12 New England Executive Park

Burlington, MA 01803

by appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Pedro (Pete) P. Rodriguez, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Exar
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.



|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 6, 2009                                                                                 
|                                                                                                       
|/s/ Pedro (Pete) P. Rodriguez                                                                          
|Pedro (Pete) P. Rodriguez Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2812 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hybrid golf club heads. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hybrid golf club heads. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HYBRID GOLF CLUB HEADS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Hybrid golf club heads (provided for in subheading 

9506.39.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2812 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350  ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P. (thePartnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, Michael J. Mauceli, principal executive officer of Reef Oil &Gas Partners, L.P., the managing general partner of Reef Global Energy IV,L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date:  April 15, 2009 | Reef  Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.        |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Managing  General Partner                      |
|                       |                                           |
|                       | By:  Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                       |                                           |
|                       |                                           |
|                       | /s/  Michael J. Mauceli                        |
|                       | Michael  J. Mauceli                            |
|                       | Manager  and Member                            |
|                       | (*principal executive officer*)                |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of §18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided tothe Partnership and will be retained by the partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Amarjit SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72630.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 14, 2004.

Earle A. Sylva, Esq., Rai Law *&*Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, Tsz-Hai Huang, Hardeep S. Rai, Earle A. Sylva, Tsz-Hai Huang, Rai *&*Assoc., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District, Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wernery, Esq., William C. Peachey, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Amarjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming the Immigration *155Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal and for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination, *Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. The IJ offered specific, cogent reasons for disbelieving him based on inconsistencies between his testimony to the asylum officer and his testimony before the IJ. *See id.*at 1043. These inconsistencies went to the heart of the asylum claim, and included discrepancies regarding events leading up to his departure from India, the length of two detentions, the injuries he sustained while detained, when he fled his village, and when his membership began in the political party that was one basis of his persecution claim. *See id.; Mejia-Paiz v. INS,*111 F.3d 720 (9th Cir.1997). Accordingly, Singh failed to establish eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. *See Chebchoub,*257 F.3d at 1045; *Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003).

In addition, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of relief under the CAT. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this, circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
ESTATE OF Aura M. CENTENO, BY AND THROUGH Leonor Gonzalez CENTENO, Personal Representative, Appellant, v. NEW HORIZON NH, LLC., Greystone Healthcare Management Corp., Matthew E. Pedersen (as to Lodge Health and Rehabilitation Center), Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-3775

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Companys Report of Dynamic Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim Coupland, Principal Executive and I, Chantal Schutz, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/ s / Tim Coupland                       
|Tim Coupland, Principal Executive Officer

October 3, 2008



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/ s / Chantal Schutz                       
|Chantal Schutz, Principal Financial Officer

October 3, 2008





---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-41039

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO GARCIA-MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-230

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Pedro Garcia-Morales (Morales) appeals his 

conviction for possessing 15 or more unauthorized access devices with intent 

to defraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(3) and his within-Guidelines 

sentence of 97 months of imprisonment. Although Morales challenges the 

sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial to support his conviction, he fails to 

show that, when the evidence and all credibility determinations are viewed in 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-41039 Document: 00512846126 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/21/2014
No. 13-41039

the light most favorable to the verdict, a rational jury could not have found 

that the evidence established the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable 

doubt. See United States v. Winkler, 639 F.3d 692, 696 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Even were we to assume arguendo that the district court abused its 

discretion when it admitted hearsay testimony from witness Gloria Borego, 

any such error would be harmless in light of the overwhelming trial evidence 

of Morales’s guilt. See United States v. Hawley, 516 F.3d 264, 268 (5th Cir. 

2008); United States v. Williams, 957 F.2d 1238, 1242 (5th Cir. 1992). 

Although Morales asserts that his rights were violated when the district court 

refused to unseal particular trial transcripts, a panel of this court has already 

considered Morales’s arguments and denied him the relief he requests, and

Morales offers no reason for us to revisit that decision. 

Finally, because he did not preserve it in the district court, we review 

Morales’s contention that the district court imposed a substantively 

unreasonable sentence for plain error only. See United States v. Peltier, 505 

F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2007). Morales acknowledges that Peltier is the

binding law of this circuit, but he does not attempt to show plain error, merely 

seeking to preserve his argument that the district court abused its discretion. 

As he does not claim that the district court plainly erred, he has abandoned 

any such argument. See United States v. Reyes, 300 F.3d 555, 558 n.2 (5th Cir. 

2002).

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-41039 Document: 00512846126 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/21/2014
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Richard W. McCullough, certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of theRegistrant:

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

a.               Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.               Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditor and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions);

a.               All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date:  December 21, 2006

|  | /s/ Richard W. McCullough                                                                 |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | Richard W. McCullough                                                                     |
|  | Chief  Financial Officer

Petroleum  Development Corporation, 

Managing  General Partner |
----

----

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010; |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 28, 2011 |  /s/ Benjamin Larsen                |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                 | Benjamin Larsen, Chief Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2749 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2749

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or coprecitates 
                  of yttrium oxide and europium oxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or coprecitates 
                  of yttrium oxide and europium oxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OR COPRECITATES OF YTTRIUM OXIDE AND EUROPIUM 
              OXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures or coprecipitates 
of yttrium oxide and europium oxide) is amended by striking the date in 
the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```