alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         105,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  435,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,972
<INVENTORY>                                     38,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               687,411
<PP&E>                                         518,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                 421,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,042,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          373,566
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,216,668
<COMMON>                                         2,990
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,189,450)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,042,338
<SALES>                                        438,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,322,586
<CGS>                                          154,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,435,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,594,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                292,351
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            292,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   292,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,808
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,089
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,207
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     62,852
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        413,772
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 515,436
<DEPOSITS>                                     381,639
<SHORT-TERM>                                    87,439
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,772
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,128
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 515,436
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,036
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,011
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   157
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,204
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,329
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,418
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      344
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,097
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,097
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,118
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.98
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,323
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,582
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       74
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,854
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,854
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

The Board of Directors 

LHC Group, Inc. 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-168977 and 333-130600) on Form S-8 of LHC Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 10, 2011 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of LHC Group, Inc. and subsidiaries asof December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010 and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010, annual report on Form 10-K of LHC Group, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 

March 10, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2788 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2788

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on polyisocyanate 
cross linking agent products containing triphenylmethane triisocyanate 
                              in solvents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on polyisocyanate 
cross linking agent products containing triphenylmethane triisocyanate 
                              in solvents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYISOCYANATE CROSS LINKING AGENT PRODUCTS CONTAINING 
              TRIPHENYLMETHANE TRIISOCYANATE IN SOLVENTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.83 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to polyisocyanate cross linking 
agent products containing triphenylmethane triisocyanate in solvents) 
is amended--
            (1) in the article description, by inserting ``(CAS No. 
        2422-91-5)'' after ``solvents''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN SAUNDERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 74 and 75 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7178** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v.
RYAN RANDALL RAMEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. ( 8:09

- cr - 00162

- RWT

- 1; 8:11

- cv - 00293

- RWT )

Submitted : December 14, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015

Before MOTZ and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ryan Randall Ramey, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions a re not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ryan Randall Ramey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits , a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U .S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional rig ht. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ramey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
/

BllRICHARDSON

Governor

DIANE DENISH

Lieutenant Governor

July 23,2010

NEW MEXICO

ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT

Air Quality Bureau

1301 Siler Road, Building B, Santa Fe, NM 87507-3113

Phone (505) 476-4300 Fax (505) 476-4375

www.mnenv.state.mn.us

RON CURRY

Secretary

SARAH COTIREIL

Deputy Secretary

Mr. Tom Diggs, Associate Director-Air

US EPA Region 6

1445 Ross Avenue

Suite 1200

Mail Code: 6PD

Dallas, TX 75202-2733

Dear Mr. Diggs:

I am writing to clarify our interpretation of the New Mexico Interstate Transport SIP for Implementation of

PM2.

S• In that SIP revision, which we submitted in 2007, we committed to follow the PMIO Surrogate Policy in

place at the time. Because of court rulings and resulting adjustments to EPA guidance, you requested that we

clarify the reference to the State's application of EPA's interim guidance on use of PMIO as a sUlTogate for

PM2.s.

The New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) requires that applicants include PM2.s modeling and

emissions in PSD and minor source permit applications. New Mexico does not use PMIO as a surrogate for

PM2.s in our permitting programs. The record for the permitting decision includes an explanation of how

PM2.5 emissions have been appropriately analyzed and estimated.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (505) 476-4301.

Sincerely,

MaryUhI

Bureau Chief
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900
<INVENTORY>                                    162,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,143
<PP&E>                                         446,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                 192,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 533,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   533,191
<SALES>                                        160,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,994
<CGS>                                          134,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,774)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,369
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,148
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Coleman Water

Treatment Facility
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2934 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain viscose rayon yarn. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain viscose 

rayon yarn. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN VISCOSE RAYON YARN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.54.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 single yarn of viscose rayon, untwisted or with a twist not 

7 exceeding 120 turns/m) is amended by striking the date 

8 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2934 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ludvik Rolin, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Victory Eagle Resources Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The annual report on Form 10-KSB of Victory Eagle Resources Corp. for the year ended July 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Victory Eagle Resources Corp.

Dated: October 31, 2007

/s/ Ludvik Rolin	Ludvik Rolin
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Pedro (Pete) P. Rodriguez, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Exar Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.

Date: November 5, 2009



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    PEDRO (PETE) P.
RODRIGUEZ               
|Pedro (Pete) P. Rodriguez                      
|Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2945 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or coprecipitates 

of yttrium oxide and europium oxide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures 

or coprecipitates of yttrium oxide and europium oxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OR COPRECIPITATES OF YTTRIUM 

4 OXIDE AND EUROPIUM OXIDE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.04 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 mixtures or coprecipitates of yttrium oxide and europium 

8 oxide) is amended by striking the date in the effective pe9 riod column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2945 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
BARRINGTON ELLIOT 

MORAIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4402

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 3, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack M. Schemer, Judge.

Barrington Elliot Morais, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2953 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bamboo kitchen devices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bamboo kitchen 

devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BAMBOO KITCHEN DEVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Forks, spoons, spatulas, turners and scrapers designed for 

use with stovetop cookwear 

(provided for in subheading 

4419.00.40 or 4419.00.80), 

the foregoing made entirely 

of bamboo .............................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2953 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2550 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2550

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Invisible Blue Dye.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Invisible Blue Dye.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INVISIBLE BLUE DYE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Invisible Blue Dye  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (CAS No. 1191239-                                                  31/2015.......
                        40-3) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3204.19.2090)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton 

JAMES E. SELLERS 

v. Record No. 2811-96-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

TIDEWATER SAND COMPANY JUNE 3, 1997 

AND 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

 NORTH AMERICA 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (James E. Sellers, pro se, on brief). 

 (Patricia C. Arrighi; Law Offices of Powell 

and Arrighi, on brief), for appellees. 

 James E. Sellers (claimant) contends that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission erred in not holding Tidewater Sand 

Company (employer) responsible for the cost of Dr. Samuel I. 

Brown's medical treatment and the surgery he performed on 

claimant's left shoulder. Upon reviewing the record and the 

briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without 

merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's 

decision. Rule 5A:27. 

 On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable 

to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. 

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). 

Unless we can say as a matter of law that claimant's evidence 

sustained his burden of proof, the commission's finding is 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

binding and conclusive upon us. See Tomko v. Michael's 

Plastering Co., 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 833, 835 (1970). 

 The commission found that claimant had recovered from his 

November 14, 1989 left shoulder dislocation and that no further 

medical treatment was required due to the compensable November 

14, 1989 injury. This finding is supported by the medical 

records. 

 On February 1, 1990, claimant's treating physician reported 

that claimant was asymptomatic and that he had full painless 

range of motion in the left shoulder, with no instability. Based 

upon this medical report and the lack of any medical treatment 

related to claimant's left shoulder between February 1, 1990 and 

November 17, 1994, the commission was entitled to infer that 

claimant had fully recovered from the November 14, 1989 injury. 

"Where reasonable inferences may be drawn from the evidence in 

support of the commission's factual findings, they will not be 

disturbed by this Court on appeal." Hawks v. Henrico County Sch. 

Bd., 7 Va. App. 398, 404, 374 S.E.2d 695, 698 (1988). 

 Based upon this record, we cannot say as a matter of law 

that claimant's evidence proved that employer should be held 

responsible for the cost of claimant's post-November 17, 1994 

medical treatment related to his left shoulder condition. 

Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.