THIS FORM WAS GENERATED BY THE eSIPS SYSTEM

1 

## eSIPS (electronic State Implementation Plan Submission) Summary Report

Note: This report is a summary of your submission to the electronic SIP (eSIPS) system and is not to be used as the official

record for your SIP submission.

Date of Report 03/08/2016 15:02:27

Form Status Complete



# e S I P S U B M I S S I O N I N F O R M A T I O N

Submission Title UT_AreaSourceRules_03082016

Pollutants Affected PM2.5 (2012 Annual), PM10 (1987)

Submittal Category/Categories AP

- Attainment Plan

- Includes any submission related to

attainment plan requirements (e.g., attainment demo, RFP/ROP,

emissions inventory, contingency measures, MVEBs, and other

related requirements), MP1

- Maintenance Plan: 1st 10 year plan

- Includes any submission related to maintenance plan

requirements (e.g., contingency measures, emissions inventory,

MVEBs, and other related requirements. May also include

redesignation request.

Other Submittal Category

Submittal Category Description

Geographic Area Affected Nonattainment Area

Are you requesting parallel processing for this SIP

Revision? No



# e S I P P A R A L L E L P R O C E S S I N G

Not applicable



# e S I P A D M I N I S T R A T I V E E V I D E N C E C O M P L E T E N E S S

C H E C K L I S T

 1. Submittal letter from Governor or designee requesting approval of the plan or revision.

 2. Evidence of adoption.

Date adopted 2/3/2016

Date effective 2/4/2016

 3. Evidence of legal authority to adopt and implement revision.

 3(a). Copy of final adopted plan and/or rule.

 3(b). Indication of changes to existing plan and/or rule if applicable.

 4. Evidence that state followed procedural requirements for adoption/issuance of plan.THIS FORM WAS GENERATED BY THE eSIPS SYSTEM

2  4(a). Evidence of public notice.

Date Public Notice Provided 11/1/2016

5. Was a public hearing requested and/or held? No

5(a). Date of first public hearing.

Date of second public hearing

Date of third public hearing

 5(b). Evidence that public hearing was held.

6. Were public comments received? No

 6(a). Compilation of public comments and state responses or declaration that no comments were received.



# e S I P A D M I N I S T R A T I V E E V I D E N C E

– S U P P O R T I N G

D O C U M E N T A T I O N

Attachment File Description

Area Source Gov Letter.pdf 1. Gov. Letter

CombinedEvidenceofAdoption.pdf 2. Evidence of adoption

Codes_UC63.3_UC19.2_R15.pdf 3. Legal Authority

Final Rules.pdf 3.a Copy of final rules

All four rules and proposed changes.pdf 3.b Changes to the rules

CombinedEvidenceofAdoption.pdf 4. Evidence of adoption

Notices for all four proposals.pdf 4.a Public notices

Comments for area source rules.pdf 5-6: No comments or hearing for area source rules

Comment Period for Def.pdf 5-6: No comments or hearing for PM 10 definitions

Certification.pdf Certification statement for area source rules

Certifying Statement for definitions re PM10

maintplan.pdf Certification statement for the definition changes

Additional Information regarding this submittal:

Please enter any additional information regarding this

submittal. This submittal includes revisions to three area source rules

(R307-101-2, R307-312-5, R307-328-4). It also includes a

second round of revisions for R307-101-2. The changes to

R307-101-2 for both the area source revisions and the definition

changes were not made effective until March 3.



# e S I P T E C H N I C A L S U P P O R T D O C U M E N T I N F O R M A T I O N

– A S

A P P L I C A B L E

Are there Technical Support Documents included in this

submittal? No

The Technical Support Document should contain the following (if applicable):

 List of Pollutants affected by plan

 Location of sources affected by plan

 Quantification of allowable emissionsTHIS FORM WAS GENERATED BY THE eSIPS SYSTEM

3  Demonstrate change meets NAAQS, PSD, RFP and/or visibility requirements

 Modeling information supporting the revision

 Evidence reductions are based on continuous emissions reduction technology

 Emission limits, work practices, record keeping, etc.

 Compliance with enforcement strategies

 Special economic and technological justifications per applicable EPA policies

 Other

Please describe all other Technical Support

Documents



# e S I P T E C H N I C A L S U P P O R T

– A D D I T I O N A L

D O C U M E N T A T I O N

Attachment File Description

This SIP submission includes additional documentation

(e.g., large modeling files) that is not submitted through

this electronic system? No

This information will be provided to EPA via: