alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ralph Schmitt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Exar Corporation on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Exar Corporation.

Date: November 9, 2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Ralph Schmitt                    
|Ralph Schmitt                        
|                                     
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|(Principal Executive Officer)
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-077-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Manitex International, Inc.



|1. | Quantum Value Management LLCa Michigan limited liability company
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Manitex, LLCa Delaware limited liability company
|-- | -------------------------------------------------



|3. | Manitex, Inc.a Texas corporation
|-- | ---------------------------------



|4. | Liftking, Inc.a Michigan corporation
|-- | -------------------------------------



|5. | Manitex Liftking, ULCan Alberta unlimited liability company
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------



|6. | Badger Equipment Companya Minnesota corporation
|-- | ------------------------------------------------



|7. | Manitex Load King, Inc.a Michigan corporation
|-- | ----------------------------------------------



|8. | CVS Ferrari srlan Italian corporation
|-- | --------------------------------------



|9. | Manitex Sabre, Inc.a Michigan corporation
|-- | ------------------------------------------
Express 

Legal Department 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3rd Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

Telephone 901.434.8600 

February 22, 2010 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations M-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Regulatory Docket # FAA-2002-12343 

Extension of Exemption 6473F 

Attached is Federal Express Corporation's request for an Extension of Exemption 6473. 

If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

rk Hansen 

Counsel 

^al/Regulatory Affairs 

(901)434-8583 

FAX: (901) 434-8283 

cc: Jim Bowman 

Steve Kuhar 

JMH/stf/588025 

Enclosures 
BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

For Renewal of Exemption 6473 

from Part 121.434(c)(l)(ii) of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations 

APPLICATION OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION OF 6473E 

Communication with respect to this document should be sent to: 

J. Mark Hansen 

Lead Counsel 

Regulatory Affairs 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3"* Floor 

Memphis, Tennessee 38125 

February 22, 2010 
BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Petition of 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

for Renewal of Exemption 6473 from 

FAR 121.434(c)(l)(ii) of the Federal 

Aviation Regulation 

Docket No. FAA-2002-12343 

PETITION OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION FROM FAR 121.434 

By letter dated January 29, 2008, Federal Express Corporation (Federal Express) 

petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for renewal of an exemption from 

section 121.434(c)(l)(ii) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR). Federal Express 

requested this original exemption and subsequent renewal in order to permit an 

appropriately qualified and authorized check airman to observe (and substitute for the 

observation by a FAA inspector) a qualifying pilot in command, who is completing initial 

or upgrade training specified in FAR 121.424 in the performance of prescribed duties 

during at least one flight leg which includes a takeoff and a landing subject to certain 

conditions and limitations to the extent necessary. An extension of the Exemption was 

granted by the FAA pursuant to Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12343 which granted 

Federal Express the FAA Exemption Number 6473F. This Exemption terminates on 

June 30, 2010. 
All of the conditions stated in Federal Express' original letter petitioning for this 

exemption and the conditions imposed by the Partial Grant of Exemption remain the 

same. Grant of this extension would have no adverse effect on safety. 

Federal Express requests that it be granted the exemption requested herein. 

Very truly yours, 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

J. Mark Hansen 

ead Counsel 

Regulatory Affairs 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3"" Floor 

Memphis, Tennessee 38125 

JMH/sll/716208
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION


I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
 periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Ameriquest
 Mortgage Securities, Inc. 2004-R10:

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion is included in these
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance required under that agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by and independent public account, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.

<page>



Date: March 1, 2005

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.


/s/: John P Grazer
John P Grazer
CFO
Exhibit 4.2

 

	
Name of Company:

LASHOU   GROUP INC.
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
LASHOU GROUP INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Number:

 
    	
 
    	
Number
    	
Class B   Ordinary Share(s)
    -  [no.   of shares] -
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 

Class B   Ordinary Share(s):

-   [no. of shares] -

 

 

 

Issued to:

[name of shareholder]

 

 

 

 

Dated

 

 

Transferred from:
    	
 
    	
Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman   Islands

 

Share capital is US$[·]   divided into

(i) [·]   Class A  Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0000005 each and

(ii) [·]   Class B  Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0000005 each

 

 

 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [name of   shareholder] is the registered holder of [no. of shares] Class B Ordinary Share(s) in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and   Articles of Association thereof.

 

 

EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the                 day   of              2011   by:
    


 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
DIRECTOR
    	
 
    	
 
    


 











 

	
 
    	
TRANSFER
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
I
    	
 
    	
(the Transferor) for the value received
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
DO HEREBY   transfer to
    	
 
    	
(the Transferee) the
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
shares standing in my name in the
    


 

undertaking called  LASHOU GROUP INC.

 

To hold the same unto the Transferee

 

 

Dated

 

 

Signed by the Transferor

 

in the presence of:

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Witness
    	
 
    	
Transferor
##### 



Exhibit 31.1Section 302 Certification I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing
distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by
this annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-56;  1.
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to
the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for
inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;  3.
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the
annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
and  4.
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee
and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth in
the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A. Date: March 29, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName:
    
    Ellen Z. LamaleTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I, James W. Landrum, President,certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Golden Chief Resources,          Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make          the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements          were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly          report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and          procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the          registrant and we have: 

    a)                 designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others          within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly          report is being prepared; 

    b)                 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this report based on such evaluation; and 

    c)                 disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to          materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial          reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over          financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee          of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent          function): 

    a)                 all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

    b)                 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting. 

Date: June 25, 2004 

By:/s/ James W. Landrum
# Official Journal C 45/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 45 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 648 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 45

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 648 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 45/01 | List of competent authorities notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 on the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes, and amending Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 45/01

List of competent authorities notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 on the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person and on requests for the comparison with Eurodac data by Member States’ law enforcement authorities and Europol for law enforcement purposes, and amending Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P E ALS E LE V EN T HC IRC U IT JULY 16, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 10889 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 6 - 0 0 0 4 0 - CR- 4 - RH U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s H E N R Y S U T T O N , a .k .a . S h a m p o o , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N or the rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju l y 16, 2008) B efo re C A RN E S , B A R K E T T an d H U L L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: K evi n R oss, appo i nt ed coun se l for H enry S ut t on i n thi s di re ctcr i m i nal2

appe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f ur the rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the appe l l a nta nd f i l e d a br i e f

pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the ent i re re cord revea l s that co u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r d r e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd S utt on’ s c onvi c t i ons a nd se nt ence s a re A FFI R M ED .
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00336

- CV

LOCKE

- STAR, INC.

v. PATRICIA GEISTER

On a ppeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013

- DCV

- 0460

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this ca use on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against parties incurring same

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. November 6, 2014.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. SHAWN VINCENT BEST, Sr.,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 22

- 30199
D.C. No. 2:22

- cr - 00001

- RMP

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 12, 2023 * *
Before: CANBY, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. Shawn Vincent Best, Sr. , appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 46

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for assault resulting in substantial bodily injury to a domestic partner in Indian country , in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(7) , 1153(a) . We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 20 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 30199

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm

. Best contends that the district court failed to explain adequately its decision to impose an above

- Guidelines sentence. He further argues that the court improperly relied on facts he did not admit and the government did not prove , resulting in a substantively unreasonable sentence. In Best’s view, the uncontested facts and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors support ed a time

- served sentence. We review Best’s unpreserved procedural claims for plain error, see United States v. Valencia

- Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010) , and his claim that the sentence is substantively unreasonable for an abuse of discretion, see Gall v. United State s, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007)

. The district court did not procedurally err, nor did it abuse its discretion in imposing the above

- Guidelines sentence. The court provided a thorough explanation for its sentencing decision, explaining that upward departures were warranted for: (1) Best’s uncounted tribal convictions for conduct similar to the offense conduct, see U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, and (2) the extreme psychological injury Best caused his victim, see U.S.S.G. § 5K2.3. The court further explained that the § 3553(a) factors independently supported the upward variance given the harm Best caused to the victim, his criminal history, his lack of remorse at sentencing, and the need to protect the public. This explanation was more than sufficient

. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, the3 22

- 30199

court permissibly relied on the presentence report and the victim’s sentencing
statement. See United States v. Christensen , 732 F.3d 1094, 1102, 1104

- 05 (9th Cir. 2013). Finally, the 46

- month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51.
AFFIRMED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 1087

_____________________________
J EROME H UGHES , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. September 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jerome Hughes, pro se
, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.