alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Miguel AVILA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4318

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 22, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Optionable, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward O’Connor,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








February
17, 2009




/s/
Thomas Burchill


Thomas
Burchill


Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director


(Principal
Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2565 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2565

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain carrying cases of plastics 
                with molded handles shaped to hold toys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain carrying cases of plastics 
                with molded handles shaped to hold toys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CARRYING CASES OF PLASTICS WITH MOLDED HANDLES 
              SHAPED TO HOLD TOYS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00       Carrying cases of  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        plastics with                                                      31/2015.......
                        molded handles
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        4202.99.90),
                        specially shaped
                        or fitted to hold
                        electronic
                        drawing toys,
                        electronic games
                        or educational
                        toys or devices,
                        and books and
                        other accessories
                        used with those
                        devices..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


Exhibit (10)(P)(1)

List of Executive Officers who are parties to

Change in Control Agreements with Harleysville Group Inc.

in the form filed as Exhibit (10)(Q) with the Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the year ended December 31, 2007




Michael L. Browne, President Chief Executive Officer (1)

Mark R. Cummins, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer

Allan R. Becker, Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary

Arthur E. Chandler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thomas E. Clark, Senior Vice President, Field Operations 

Donna M. Dever, Senior Vice President, Performance Excellence

Robert A. Kauffman, Senior Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Governance Officer

Theodore A. Majewski, Senior Vice President, Personal Lines (2)

Kevin M. Toth, Senior Vice President, Claims

Akhil Tripathi, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Robert G. Whitlock Jr., Senior Vice President & Chief Underwriting Officer




_________________

(1)

Mr. Browne’s agreement is substantially similar to the agreement with other executives except for the following: (a) the factor in Section 4(c)(ii)(b) is 2.999 instead of 2.000; (b) the period in (i) the last proviso to Section 1, (ii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3, (iii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3(c), and (iv) Section 4(c)(vii) is thirty-six (36) months instead of twenty-four months; (c) the Initial Expiration Date is December 31, 200[9], instead of December 31, 200[7]; and (d) in Section 1, the date January 1, 200[8] is January 1, 20[10].




(2)

Mr. Majewski’s agreement has the following differences: (a) the factor in Section 4(c)(ii)(b) is 1.000 instead of 2.000; and (b) the period in (i) the last proviso to Section 1, (ii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3, (iii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3(c), and (iv) Section 4(c)(vii) is twelve (12) months instead of twenty-four months.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2540 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2540

    To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Basic Violet 11:1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Basic Violet 11:1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11:1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Basic Violet 11:1) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Hector Guillermo VEGA-SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-73903,

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted: May 10, 2004.*

Decided: May 14, 2004.

Hector Guillermo Vega-Sanchez, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, NVL-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Las Vegas, NV, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri J. Scadron, Esq., Leslie McKay, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hector Guillermo Vega-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se *153for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) per curiam affirmance of the immigration judge’s decision that Vega-Sanchez abandoned his opportunity to file an application for cancellation of removal. The BIA also denied Vega-Sanchez’s motion to reopen and remand to apply for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). We review the BIA’s decision for abuse of discretion, *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We review de novo claims of due process violations in removal proceedings. *See Castillo-Perez v. INS,*212 F.3d 518, 523 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review in part, and dismiss it in part.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in refusing to reopen Vega-Sanchez’s case because it correctly determined that Vega-Sanchez failed to establish the threshold statutory requirement of ten years continuous physical presence to qualify for cancellation of removal. *See Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS,*213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2000). Similarly, contrary to Vega-Sanchez’s contention, the format and content of the BIA’s order did not violate his due process rights because, despite its brevity, the BIA’s opinion addressed the issues Vega-Sanchez raised on appeal and sufficiently detailed the reasons for denial. *See Marcu v. INS,*147 F.3d 1078, 1082 (9th Cir. 1998) (“all that is necessary is a decision that sets out terms sufficient to enable us as a reviewing court to see that the Board has heard, considered, and decided.”) (citation omitted).

We lack jurisdiction to review Vega-Sanchez’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim, or his claim that the immigration judge denied him a full and fair hearing, because he did not raise these issues before the BIA. *See Liu v. Waters,*55 F.3d 421, 424-25 (9th Cir.1995); *Sanchez-Cruz v. INS,*255 F.3d 775, 779-780 (9th Cir. 2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-1021 (Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record[1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on malleable iron pipe fittings from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

                    The Commission instituted this review on November 3, 2008 (73 FR 65401) and determined on February 6, 2009 that it would conduct an expedited review (74 FR 7703). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's review was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 19, 2009 (74 FR 7703).                

                    The Commission is scheduled to transmit its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on April 1, 2009. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4069 (April 2009), entitled                     *Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings from China (Inv. No. 731-TA-1021 (Review)*).                

Issued: April 1, 2009.

By order of the Commission.

 Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

 [FR Doc. E9-8014 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,102
<SECURITIES>                                       250
<RECEIVABLES>                                      672
<ALLOWANCES>                                       132
<INVENTORY>                                        594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,063
<PP&E>                                          79,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,124
<BONDS>                                          4,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,094
<SALES>                                          2,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,483
<CGS>                                            2,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     29
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 29
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        29
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 11027 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DAMON CURTIS WEISS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10

- CR

- 20 4

- 1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Damon Curtis
Weiss has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Weiss has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Weiss ’s claims of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we th erefore decline to consider the claims without

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 16, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-11027 Document: 00513638653 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2016No. 15

- 11027

2 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Weiss ’s response. We concur with counsel’s

assessme nt that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 15-11027 Document: 00513638653 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17992-17993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,034]


ArcelorMittal Lackawanna LLC, A Subsidiary of ArcelorMittal USA, 
Blasdell, NY; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January

[[Page 17993]]

29, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on 
behalf of workers of ArcelorMittal Lackawanna LLC, a subsidiary of 
ArcelorMittal USA, Blasdell, New York.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8914 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - 32 CFR Part 160 
          - [DoD Instruction 5000.35] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

This final rule removes the DoD's rule concerning the management and operation of the Defense Acquisition Regulations (DAR) System. The part has served the purpose for which it was intended for the Code of Federal Regulations, and is no longer necessary. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 16, 2009.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Patricia L. Toppings at 703-696-5284. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A copy of the current DoD Instruction may be obtained from                     *http://www.dtic.mil/​whs/​directives/​corres/​pdf/​500035p.pdf.*

# List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 160

      - Armed forces; government procurement

# PART 160—[REMOVED] 

Accordingly, by the authority of 10 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 160 is removed.

Dated: January 12, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

 [FR Doc. E9-877 Filed 1-15-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 99-a

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Newhall Land and Farming Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003, I, Gary M. Cusumano, President and Chief Executive Officer of Newhall Management Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|Date: May 7, 2003 |  | THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
(a California Limited Partnership)
Registrant
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |                                                                                   
|                  |  | By Newhall Management Limited Partnership,
Managing General Partner               
|                  |  |                                                                                   
|                  |  | By Newhall Management Corporation,
Managing General Partner                       
|                  |  |                                                                                   
|                  |  | By:                                                                               

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Newhall Land and Farming Company and will be retained by The Newhall Land and Farming Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certification of Periodic Financial Reports**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C §1350)**

** **

I,Barry Golko, of Analytical Surveys, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

** **

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31,2006 (the “Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of AnalyticalSurveys, Inc.

 

 
| Dated:  May  15, 2006 |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |
| /s/  Barry  Golko     |   |
| Barry  Golko                    |
| Chief  Accounting Officer       |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cardero Resource Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hendrik Van Alphen, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  January 29, 2010

(signed)Hendrik Van Alphen

Hendrik Van Alphen, 
President and Chief Executive Officer