alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7007** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JOSEPH TERRELL BRISCOE, a/k/a Dreads , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg
. John Preston Bailey , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00065

- JPB

- JES

- 1 ; 3:14

- cv - 00127

- JPB

JES )

Submitted : December 15, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Joseph Terrell Briscoe , Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney , Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Terrell Briscoe seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a con stitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional clai ms is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Briscoe has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                         OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis LaPrairie, principal accounting officer of AAA Energy, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AAA Energy,
Inc., for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of AAA Energy, Inc.


/s/ Dennis LaPrairie
------------------------------------
Dennis LaPrairie
Principal Accounting Officer
October 27, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2886]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

April 6, 2009.
    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of these documents is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by April 28, 2009. See 
Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1). Replies 
to oppositions must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions have expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast 
Bands (ET Docket No. 04-186), Additional Spectrum for Unlicensed 
Devices below 900 MHz and in the 3 GHz Band (ET Docket No. 02-380).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 17.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8397 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2609 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2609

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Famoxadone, Cymoxanil, 
                       and application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Coons introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Famoxadone, Cymoxanil, 
                       and application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FAMOXADONE, CYMOXANIL, AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.45 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of 5-methyl-5-(4-
phenoxyphenyl)-3-(phenyl-amino)-2,4-oxazolidinedione](famoxadone), 2-
cyano-N-[(ethylamino)-carbonyl]-2-(methoxyimino)acetamide (Cymoxanil) 
and application adjuvants) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew M. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Corporation.

Date: March 29, 2011



By:

/S/    ANDREW M.
SIMSName:

Andrew M. SimsTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
March 19, 2013 

Mr. John Varley 

Senior Vice President and General Counsel 

Virgin America, Inc. 

555 Airport Boulevard, Suite 500 

Burlingame, CA 94010 

Dear Mr. Varley: 

This is in response to your February 28, 2013 letter sent to the public docket 

(No. FAA-2013-0224) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Virgin 

America, Inc., for an exemption from § 121.803(c)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would provide relief from the 

requirement to include Dextrose in an Emergency Medical Kit (EMK). 

On March 14, 2013, the FAA issued Exemption No. 10721 (copy enclosed) to Airlines for 

America, National Air Carrier Association, Regional Airline Association, its members, and 

similarly situated air carriers. 

Because the relief you seek is now covered under Exemption No. 10721, we will take no 

further action on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HABERSHAM BANCORP FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       8,850,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,980,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,562,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 39,206,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      14,111,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        13,530,000
<LOANS>                                    377,914,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,239,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             472,457,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 326,103,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                84,907,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         15,474,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 10,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,699,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,274,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             472,457,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,479,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              758,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               174,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,411,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,758,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,118,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,293,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  120,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,999,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                893,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     893,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   679,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.98
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,174,622
<LOANS-PAST>                                   469,244
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               747,214
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,182,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   75,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    12,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,239,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,239,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: June 8, 2009
    
    /s/ Robert E. Dose

Robert E. DoseVice President of Finance of Virco Mfg. Corporation(Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

ELIZABETH A. EARLS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) SC S51005 ) HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, ) State of Oregon, ) ***AMENDED** ) **ORDER CERTIFYING** Respondent. ) **BALLOT TITLE**

Upon consideration by the court. Petitioner’s arguments that the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 97 (2004) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Dated this 4th day of February 2004.

WALLACE P. CARSON, JR. CHIEF JUSTICE

c: Bruce A. Bishop Rolf C. Moan Publications, Oregon Judicial Department Hon. Bill Bradbury, Oregon Secretary of State

**DESIGNATION OF PREVAILING PARTY AND AWARD OF COSTS** Prevailing party: Respondent [XX] No costs allowed.

order.wpd
# Official Journal C 269/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 269 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 494 November 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 269

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 494 November 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 269/1 | Commission Communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on measuring instruments (Publication of the references to normative documents drawn up by OIML and the list of the parts thereof corresponding to the essential requirements (in conformity with Article 16.1 of the Directive))
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 269/1

Commission Communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on measuring instruments (Publication of the references to normative documents drawn up by OIML and the list of the parts thereof corresponding to the essential requirements (in conformity with Article 16.1 of the Directive))
   (1)

(Publication of the references to normative documents drawn up by OIML and the list of the parts thereof corresponding to the essential requirements (in conformity with Article 16.1 of the Directive))

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
David R. PIERCE, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-3594

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Modeling files for Arizona Regional Haze FIP, 2012-07-12

These are supplemental, and were not relied on for NPRM

See additional notes in AZ_NPRM_zip_file_notes.txt

•e.g. naming convention

-------------------------------------------------------

Modeling for Coronado visibility impacts at Bosque del Apache

•Coronado_base_q_NPRM.zipx

Modeling for LNB-only Coronado visibility impacts at all areas

•Coronado_bosq_NPRM.zipx

-------------------------------------------------------

Except for the CALPOST.LST outputs, the "bosq" files use a

different naming convention than the rest:

CALPUFF and POSTUTIL

•xx_Coronado_MODSCEN_AREA_YYYY.inp

•where xx = cf for CALPUFF, pu for POSTUTIL

CALPOST

•ct_coronado_MODSCEN_AREA_VISM_BGND_YYYY.inp

•srp_az_unit1-2_MODSCEN_pu_YYYY_calpost_AREA_VISM_BGND.lst
STATE of Louisiana v. Justin Robert SIZEMORE

No. 2017-KP-0487

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF VERNON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator failed to carry his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
## NO. 12

- 15

- 00255

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: JOHN JACOB PRESLEY,
RELATOR § § § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM In this original proceeding, filed on October 16, 2015, Relator seek s a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to rule on Relator’s motions for leave to conduct discovery and appointment of counsel. On November 9, 2015, Relator filed a notice of appeal in this Court’s
cause number 12

- 15

- 00276

- CR, complaining of the tr ial court’s rulings on these motions. In the notice of appeal, Relator recites that the trial court signed a written order on October 20, 2015, denying his motions for leave to conduct discovery and appointment of counsel. Thus, Relator
has obtained the relief sought in his petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). Opinion delivered November 18, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 18, 2015

NO. 12

- 15

- 00255

- CR

JOHN JACOB PRESLEY,

Relator V.

HON. EDWIN A. KLEIN , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by John Jacob Presley; who is the relator in Cause No. F1017393, pending on the docket of the 420th District Court Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches, Texas. Said petition for writ of

m andamus having been filed herein on October 16, 2015, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the said petition for writ of mandamus be
dismissed as moot , it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot

.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications**     I, Jerome J. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of First Business Financial Services, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Business Financial Services,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(c)and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresandpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                                                 /s/ Jerome J. Smith   Jerome J. Smith   Chief Executive Officer     March 15, 2006 
94
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 15

- 00008

- CV

Billy Dean Caldwell

v.

The State of Texas

(No. 22015; 22349 IN 6TH DISTRICT COURT OF LA MAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING $0.00 $195.00 INDIG ENT

INDIGENT BILLY CALDWELL

BILLY D. CALDWELL

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause,

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for the Sixth District of Texas, this July 10, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy