alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.38****FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**     **This First Amendment to Employment Agreement**is effective as of November 18, 2005 and isentered into by and between **American Reprographics Company**, a Delaware corporation (“**ARC**”) as theemployer, and **Kumarakulasingam Suriyakumar**(“**Executive**”), as the employee.     **This First Amendment**is entered into with reference to the following facts:     ARC and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated January 7, 2005 (“Agreement).The parties agreed on November 18, 2005 to clarify Section 3(b) of the Agreement and this FirstAmendment is entered into to memorialize that agreement.**Now therefore**, the parties agree as follows: 1. Section 3(b)(iii) of the Agreement is amended in full to read as follows:    (iii) The Incentive Bonus shall be paid in cash or ARC common stock, or partly ineach, as elected by Executive by notice to ARC delivered not more than 40 days afterthe close of each fiscal year. To the extent that such Incentive Bonus is paid incash, it shall be paid no later than 60 days after the close of such fiscal year.To the extent that such Incentive Bonus is paid in ARC common stock, such stockshall be valued as of any business day (“valuation date”) determined by ARC which isafter the date of election by Executive but is not later than 60 days after theclose of such fiscal year, using the average of the closing prices of ARC commonstock on the New York Stock Exchange for the 10 trading days immediately precedingthe valuation date. Such shares shall be issued forthwith after the approval of thecalculation of the number of shares to be issued to Executive by the CompensationCommittee of the Board of Directors of ARC at its first meeting following thevaluation date, but in no event shall such shares be issued later than two andone-half months after the close of such fiscal year, provided, however, that as acondition to receiving ARC common stock Executive must deposit with ARC on the dateof issuance cash in the amount, if any, by which the total of employee withholdingtaxes required to be withheld with respect to the entire Incentive Bonus exceeds thecash portion of the Incentive Bonus available for withholding. To be eligible toreceive a bonus, Executive must have been employed by ARC during the entire fiscalyear to which such Incentive Bonus relates.
 

 
 2. In all other respects the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect withoutmodification.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreementas of the date first hereinabove set forth.      AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY,
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2835 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of 

higher education to post certain IRS returns on their websites. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require 

institutions of higher education to post certain IRS returns on their websites. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increased Trans5 parency in Higher Education Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Internal Revenue Service Form 990— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2835 IS

1 (A) provides the public with financial in2 formation about a given nonprofit organization, 

3 and is often the only source of this information; 

4 and 

5 (B) is based on 3 guiding principles: en6 hancing transparency, promoting tax compli7 ance, and minimizing the burden on the filing 

8 organization. 

9 (2) Section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code 

10 of 1986, requires Internal Revenue Service Form 

11 990 to be available for public inspection; however, 

12 the public is generally not aware that nonprofit in13 stitutions of higher education are required to file 

14 such Form 990 and would not know to look for one. 

15 (3) Giving students and parents easy access to 

16 Internal Revenue Service Form 990s filed by non17 profit institutions of higher education will increase 

18 transparency and allow students and parents to 

19 make more informed decisions. 

20 SEC. 3. POSTING OF IRS RETURN. 

21 Part B of title I of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

22 (20 U.S.C. 1011 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

23 the following: 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2835 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 124. POSTING OF IRS RETURN. 

2 ‘‘Each institution of higher education that receives 

3 Federal financial assistance and is required to file a return 

4 under section 6033 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 

5 shall post such return on the website of the institution.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 28A/4 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 28A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 484 February 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 28A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 484 February 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 028A/2 | Directorate-General for Trade — Publication of a vacancy for Deputy Director-General (grade A*15) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) COM/2005/268 | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 028A/2

Directorate-General for Trade — Publication of a vacancy for Deputy Director-General (grade A*15) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) COM/2005/268

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NUMBER 13-09-00129-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MARTIN PENA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 94th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Martin Pena, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss

his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the
2

appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate

will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 20th day of August, 2009.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             159
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,153
<PP&E>                                           4,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,485
<BONDS>                                          1,339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,805
<OTHER-SE>                                         547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,176
<SALES>                                            587
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,460
<CGS>                                               63
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (766)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (766)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (766)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2958 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2958

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric wine bottle 
                                openers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric wine bottle 
                                openers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRIC WINE BOTTLE OPENERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Electromechanical   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        wine bottle                                                        31/2015.......
                        openers, with
                        self-contained
                        electric motor
                        and incorporating
                        a rechargeable
                        battery (provided
                        for in subheading
                        8509.80.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2912 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fuel injectors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fuel injectors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUEL INJECTORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Fuel injectors, each functional in a common rail fuel 

system with a pressure greater than 1200 bar (provided 

for in subheading 

8481.80.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2912 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2652 

To suspend temporarily the duty on bicycle speedometer parts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on bicycle speedometer 

parts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BICYCLE SPEEDOMETER PARTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Bicycle speedometer parts 

(provided for in subheading 

9029.90.40) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2652 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2753 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2753

     To suspend temporarily the duty on potassium 1,3-dioxo-1H,3H-
                   naphthol[1,8-cd]pyran-6-sulfonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on potassium 1,3-dioxo-1H,3H-
                   naphthol[1,8-cd]pyran-6-sulfonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POTASSIUM 1,3-DIOXO-1H,3H-NAPHTHOL[1,8-CD]PYRAN-6-SULFONATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Potassium 1,3-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        dioxo-1H,3H-                                                       31/2015.......
                        naphthol[1,8-
                        cd]pyran-6-
                        sulfonate (CAS
                        No. 71501-16-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2917.39.04)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                            TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY
                       LONG-TERM INCENTIVE CASH AWARD PLAN

                                 AWARD AGREEMENT
                                      (SAR)

     Agreement made effective ____________, 20__ (the "Grant Date") between
Tecumseh Products Company, a Michigan corporation (the "Company"), and
________________________ (the "Employee").

     This Agreement confirms the grant of a SAR pursuant to and subject to all
the terms and conditions of the Tecumseh Products Company Long-Term Incentive
Cash Award Plan, as it may have been and in the future may be amended in
accordance with its terms (the "Plan"). In this Agreement capitalized terms that
are used without separate definition have the meanings given to them in the
Plan.

     The SAR granted and its terms are as follows:

     -    Number of shares of Class A Stock represented by SAR: _________

     -    Strike Price per share: $_______

     -    SAR vests as to:

               -    _____ shares on __________, 20__;

               -    an additional _____ shares on __________, 20__; and

               -    the final _____ shares on __________, 20__

     -    SAR expires: __________, 20__

     The SAR may be exercised, in whole or in part, by delivering a notice of
exercise to the Company's Secretary in the manner prescribed in the Plan. As
soon as reasonably practicable after each exercise, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Plan, the Company will pay the Employee an amount in cash
equal the product obtained by multiplying:

          (a) (1) the Fair Market Value of one share of Class A stock on the
     date the Secretary receives the notice of exercise, minus (2) the Strike
     Price; times

          (b) the number of shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised.

     In no event will payment be made later than the 15th day of the third month
following the end of the Company's taxable year in which the SAR is exercised.

<PAGE>

     The Company will be entitled to deduct from each amount payable to the
Employee any sums required by federal, state, or local tax law to be withheld
with respect to the vesting or payment of the SAR.

     No portion of the SAR that has not vested and become payable at Termination
of Employment will vest or become payable, except as may be otherwise provided
by the express terms of a Management Contract.

     The Employee's signature below indicates the Employee's acknowledgement
that the Employee has received and read a copy of the Plan. In the event of a
conflict between any term or provision contained in this Agreement and a term or
provision of the Plan, the applicable terms and provisions of the Plan will
govern and prevail.

TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY               EMPLOYEE:


By:
    ---------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
    [Name]                              [Name]
    [Title]


                                       -2-
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-20554

Summary Calendar

Juan Enriquez, 

Petitioner—Appellant,

versus

Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 

Correctional Institutions Division, 

Respondent—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CV-2895

Before Stewart, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Juan Enriquez, Texas prisoner # 227122, seeks leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal to challenge the district court’s transfer of 

his pro se motion for leave to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 11, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-20554 Document: 00516315097 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/11/2022
No. 20-20554

2

corpus. The transfer order is not an appealable final judgment under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 or a certified appealable interlocutory order under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292. See Persyn v. United States, 935 F.2d 69, 72 (5th Cir. 1991). Likewise, 

it is not appealable under the collateral order doctrine. See id. at 72-73. We 

therefore lack appellate jurisdiction. See id. at 73.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and 

Enriquez’s IFP motion is DENIED. His remaining pending motions are

also DENIED. Enriquez is WARNED that the filing of frivolous, 

repetitive, or otherwise abusive challenges to his conviction or confinement 

will invite the imposition of sanctions, which can include dismissal, monetary 

sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court and any 

court subject to this court’s jurisdiction. The court further reminds Enriquez 

that until the $300 sanction recently imposed in Enriquez v. Lumpkin, No. 20-

50904, is paid, he is barred from filing any pro se pleading or appeal in any 

court subject to this court’s jurisdiction without the advance written 

permission of a judge of the forum court. 

Case: 20-20554 Document: 00516315097 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/11/2022
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald M. Sherer, as Chief Financial Officer of Refco Group Ltd., LLC and Refco Finance Inc. (together, the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
July 19, 2005

| |  |  | /s/GERALD M. SHERER                     
| |  |  | ----------------------------------------
| |  |  | Gerald M. Sherer
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
---

Exhibit 4.33

HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 2010 Equity Compensation Plan Approved by the shareholders of Helix BioPharma Corp. on December 9, 2010 and Implemented by the Directors of Helix BioPharma Corp. on December 9, 2010 Amendment No. 1 June 29, 2011


---

HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. 2010 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANAMENDMENT NO. 1 WHEREAS: A.

   Helix BioPharma Corp. (the “Company”) has adopted an equity compensation plan entitled the “2010 Equity Compensation Plan” (the “Plan”);B.

   The Plan was approved by shareholders and implemented by the directors of the Company on December 9, 2010;C.

   The Company wishes to amend section 9.4 of the Plan pursuant to the amending authority provided in section 10.1(a) of the Plan;
 NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to section 10.1 (a) of the Plan: 1.

   Section 9.4(b) of the Plan is hereby amended to delete the words “a Grantee” and to substitute therefor the words “an insider Grantee”.2.

   The amended section 9.4(b) of the Plan shall read as follows:
  9.4

   Blackout Period
 (b) In the event that the particular date used to determine the Fair Market Value of a Share for the purposes of calculating the number of Shares, the Appreciation Amount or the Option Appreciation Amount, as the case may be, an insider Grantee is entitled to receive under the terms of an Award Agreement falls during a Blackout Period, then that particular date used to calculate the number of Shares, the Appreciation Amount or the Option Appreciation Amount, as the case may be, will be the first business day after the Blackout Period ends. 3.

   For the sake of clarity, all other terms of the original 2010 Equity Compensation Plan remain unchanged.
 Dated June 29, 2011 HELIX BIOPHARMA CORP. Per: /s/ Gordon LickrishAuthorized Signatory


---