alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 73 (Friday, April 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17845-17846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13343-000]


Hydro Energy Technologies, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit 
Applications Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To 
Intervene, and Competing Applications

April 9, 2009.
    On December 9, 2008, Hydro Energy Technologies, LLC filed an 
application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Mosquito Creek Hydroelectric 
Project, to be located on Mosquito Creek, in Trumbull County, Ohio.
    The proposed Mosquito Creek Hydroelectric Project would be located 
at: (1) the existing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 5,650-foot-long, 47-
foot-high Mosquito Creek Dam; and (2) an existing 8,900-acre reservoir 
with water surface elevation of 904 feet mean sea level.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) A new powerhouse 
containing one or more turbine/generators with a total installed 
capacity of 0.5 megawatts; (2) a new 50-foot-long, 60-inch-diameter 
penstock; (3) a new 400-foot-long

[[Page 17846]]

transmission line; and (4) appurtenant facilities. The Mosquito Creek 
Project would have an estimated average annual generation of 1,682 
megawatts-hours, which would be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Anthony J. Marra, Managing Partner, Hydro 
Energy Technologies, LLC, 31300 Solon Rd., Suite 12, Solon, OH 44139, 
(440) 498-1000.
    FERC Contact: John Ramer, (202) 502-8969.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13343) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8804 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000751256
<NAME> DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1985-2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          57,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,585
<PP&E>                                      22,443,456
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,376,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,441
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,894
<SALES>                                        160,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               162,501
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,170
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,170
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

FOR THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Andrew M. Sims, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MHI Hospitality
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 22, 2007



By:

/s/    ANDREW M.
SIMSName:

Andrew M. SimsTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
Jose DAVILA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3612

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
## ^'ti?JLiH^« « TOW N O F LEXINGTO N TM^'^^S£^ S '"j:^^ " ::-PARTMENTO F MAfLlN C ADDRES S MAVORPRO-TE M ^<<3J'*«::>
. ; n A lOnAnTATtXl l Pw t Offic e Bo i 39 7 

## /2^v^f!3 ^ ' :<E I OPERATION S INFORMATIO N COUNCI L W[ ( M JlfVO l H MMW-41 M Dun y Frazie

r \j,\\..di./ ^ ^^* W WWWJ«XKLC»I B Ttddstae^dii k NSr ^ ^^ ^ ^•J'- ' jf^ T - 1 A IQ : 2 5 FA X Te dSuubolit k

\!!>»*i—^^" ^ S9J-359-44S 0 Augus t 17 , 201 0 Ms
. Susan Kurlan d Assistan t Secretary fo

r Aviatio n & Internationa l Affairs , X- 1 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E W88-32 4 Washington , D C 2059 0 Subject : Smal l Community Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Gran t Applicatio n Docke t OST-2010-012 4 Columbi aMetropolita n Airport - Columbia , S C Dear Ms
. Kurland : A s th e Mayo r

o f Lexington , S C an dafrequent ai r traveler , I strongl y support th e ai r servic e proposa l detaile di n th e Smal l Community Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Programgran t

application
. Commercia l ai r

servic e a t Columbi aMetropolita n Airport play s avita l rol e i n providing support t o education , government , business , an dleisur e trave l to/fro mth e area . Futur e communit y growth o f th e Columbi acommunitie s depends , i n part , o n th e airport' s ability t o mee t th e need s o f

existin g loca l Lexingto n businesse s a s wel l a s companie s considerin g Colimibi aa s alocatio n fo r thei r operations
. Th e proposal t o support improve dai r

servic e wil l greatl y improv e ou r

ability t o remai n competitiv e i n th e global marketplace , whic h i s th e basi s for supportin g th e local economy an dattractin g ne w businesse s an dresident s t o th e area . Th e Columbi aMetropolita n Airport ha s forge dstron g partnership s with both th e busines s an d governmenta l communitie s t o retai n an dimprov e local ai r service
. W e appreciat e th e opportunity t o expan dtha t partnershi p t o includ e th e U.S
. Departmen t o f Transportatio n throug h th e Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program
. Sincere l
Halfacre , Mayo r Sw n o f Lexingto n
cc : U.S
. Senato r

Lindse y Graha m U
. S
. Congressman Jo e Wilso n
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

SILVA HINCH, No. 84438 

Appellant, 

vs. 

DUSTY JENSEN, 

Respondent. 

MED 

APR 0 8 2022 

A. BROWN 

EAlE COUIU 

ERK 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a 

motion to modify custody of a minor child and from a district court order 

granting a motion for temporary sole custody of a minor child. Fourth 

Judicial District Court, Elko County; Alvin R. Kacin, Judge. 

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court 

reveals a jurisdictional defect. Notice of entry of the order granting the 

motion to modify custody was served on appellant, via mail, on February 3, 

2022. Thus, the notice of appeal was due to be filed in the district court by 

March 10, 2022. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRCP 6(d). Appellant, however, did not 

file the notice of appeal in the district court until March 17, 2022. Further, 

an order awarding temporary custody of a minor child is not substantively 

appealable. In re Temporary CustOdy of Five Minors, 105 Nev. 441, 777 P.2d 

901 (1989); cf. NRAP 3A(b)(7) (authorizing an appeal from a district court 

order finally establishing the custody of minor children). Accordingly, this 

court lacks jurisdiction, see Healy v. Volkswagenwerk, 103 Nev. 329, 330-31, 

SUPREME Cowls 

oF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 44114to 
741 P.2d 432, 433 (1987) (this court lacks jurisdiction over an untimely 

notice of appeal), and 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

J. 

Silver 

4. 

CeeeN, ,J. Pick. 

Cadish Pickering 

J. 

ce: Hon. Alvin R. Kacin, District Judge 

Silva Hinch 

Dusty Jensen 

Elko County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

tO) 1947A 4EN10 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2731 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2731

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain pressure 
                         distillation columns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain pressure 
                         distillation columns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PRESSURE DISTILLATION COLUMNS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.36 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain pressure 
distillation columns) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL**

**OFFICER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LP**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying annualreport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Ken Maples, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President-Finance and Secretary ofHiland Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Partners, LP (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date: March 30, 2006 | /s/ Ken Maples                                                  |   |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Ken Maples                                                      |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer,  Vice President-Finance  and Secretary |

 

1

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2703 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-acetylbutyrolactone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2- 

acetylbutyrolactone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-ACETYLBUTYROLACTONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.65 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-acetylbutyrolactone) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2703 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Form of Second Amendment to Change of Control Severence



 Exhibit 10.13 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 BY AND BETWEEN 
 ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD.

 AND
                                     
 Energy Partners, Ltd. and
                             hereby agree to amend the Change of Control Severance Agreement between
them dated as of                             , as amended by the First Amendment thereto (the
“Severance Agreement”), as follows: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 1 of the Severance Agreement is amended by deleting
“March 28, 2008” and substituting in lieu thereof “March 28, 2009”. 
 2. The first sentence of Section 2 of the
Severance Agreement is amended by deleting “March 28, 2008” and substituting in lieu thereof “March 28, 2009”. 
 3.
Section 5.2 of the Severance Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “5.2 Termination of
Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force and effect if a Change of Control (as defined in Section 4 of this Agreement) of the Company does not occur before March 28, 2009.” 
 Except as amended as herein set forth, the Severance Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands on this          day of
                                , 2008 in multiple originals, each of which shall
have the same force and effect as if it were the sole original. 
  

			
	 ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD.

		
	 By:
	 	 
		
		 	 
		 	 Executive:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7134

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID M. SCATES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CR-98-87)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Scates, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Noelle

Dalrymple, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David M. Scates seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his motion

for criminal contempt. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Scates, No. CR-98-87 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2866 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4′-thiobis[2-(1,1-di-methylethyl)-5- 

methyl-phenol]. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4′-thiobis[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-5-methyl-phenol]. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4,4′-THIOBIS[2-(1,1-DI-METHYLETHYL)-5-METH4 YL-PHENOL]. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4,4′-Thiobis[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-5-methyl-phenol] 

(CAS No. 96–69–5) (provided for in subheading 

2930.90.29) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2866 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 17, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-21053

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONALD BARRY FORRESTER, also known as Ron Forrester; LESLIE FORRESTER, also known as Leslie Janet Hocker, Defendants-Appellants.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No.4:02-CR-109

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

          - [Docket ID: USN-2009-0013]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Marine Corps, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice To Delete System of Records.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Marine Corps is deleting a system of records in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

This proposed action will be effective without further notice on May 18, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, FOIA/PA Section (CMC-ARSF), 2 Navy Annex, Room 3134, Washington, DC 20380-1775.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Teresa D. Ross at (703) 614-4008.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The U.S. Marine Corps systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The U.S. Marine Corps proposes to delete a system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of new or altered systems reports.

Dated: April 14, 2009.

Morgan E. Frazier,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

### Deletion:

## MMN00004

### System name:

Marine Corps Club Records (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10630).

### Reason:

                        The United States Marine Corps no longer uses this system.                              ( print page 17838)    

Therefore, this Privacy Act System of Records Notice should be deleted.

[FR Doc. E9-8838 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21039

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OCTAVIO BETANCUR Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CR-304-1)
January 8, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.