alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ann Marie WHEELER, Appellant, v. Jeffrey A. TURNAU, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2748 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2748

             To suspend temporarily the duty on benzamine, 
                          dodecyl-, branched.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on benzamine, 
                          dodecyl-, branched.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENZAMINE, DODECYL-, BRANCHED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Benzamine, dodecyl- Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          , branched (CAS                                                   12/31/2015
                          No. 68411-48-3)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2921.49.65)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 06-60702

Summary Calendar

_____________________

WILLIE A. WRIGHT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

________________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States Tax Court

Tax Court Docket No. 22905-04

________________________________________________________________________

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Willie W. Wright, pro se, appeals an adverse judgment of the Tax

Court. He argues that the Tax Court erred in finding that he was not entitled

to claim a casualty loss deduction. In 1997, Wright’s home was destroyed by

fire. He claimed a casualty loss of $160,402 on his 1997 income tax return for
the destruction of the home and its contents. The Tax Court found that

Wright failed to carry his burden of substantiating a loss in excess of the

insurance proceeds that he received, as required by 26 U.S.C. § 165(a). That

finding is not clearly erroneous. Wright did not submit evidence of the fair

market value of the property immediately before and immediately after the

fire, nor did he prove his adjusted basis in the property. The judgment of the

Tax Court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Axion International Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
James Kerstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ James KersteinJames
      KersteinChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      17, 2010
#### William KIGGUNDU, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Respondent.

No. 03-1175.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 12, 2004.

Decided: June 1, 2004.

Donald L. Schlemmer, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WIDENER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Kiggundu, a native and citizen of Uganda, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

On appeal, Kiggundu first claims that the immigration judge improperly discounted documentary evidence in denying his application for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Kiggundu fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks.

Kiggundu also claims that the Board violated his due process rights in affirming the decision of the immigration judge without opinion, after review by a single Board member, in accordance with the procedure set out in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4) (2003). We have reviewed his challenges to the Board’s use of this streamlined procedure and find them to be without merit. Kiggundu’s argument is squarely foreclosed by our recent decision in *Blanco de Belbruno v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 272 (4th Cir.2004).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
Exhibit 32.2  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Medizone International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Steve M. Hanni Steve M. Hanni, Principal Financial Officer  Date: November 12, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  SLC_278600.1
v237484_ex10-18 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Morgan E. O’Brien,Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A ofpdvWireless, Inc.; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: July 15, 2019   /s/ MORGAN E. O’BRIEN   Morgan E. O’Brien   
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                <C>              <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS            6-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Mar-31-1999      Mar-31-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                     Jul-01-1998      Apr-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                       Sep-30-1998      Sep-30-1998       
<CASH>                                       0          268,710  
<SECURITIES>                                 0                0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                0        3,553,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0         (122,000)  
<INVENTORY>                                  0        1,776,074  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0        6,402,406  
<PP&E>                                       0        1,214,007  
<DEPRECIATION>                               0        (584,260)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               0        8,448,542  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0        3,281,866  
<BONDS>                                      0               0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0            5,537  
<PREFERRED>                                  0                0  
<COMMON>                                     0                0  
<OTHER-SE>                                   0        5,137,897  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 0        8,448,542  
<SALES>                              3,213,930        6,177,903  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     3,213,930        6,177,903  
<CGS>                                1,056,431        2,064,436  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,057,601        3,690,216  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0                0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0                0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    (21,311)         (30,280)  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         81,456          398,176  
<INCOME-TAX>                           (6,985)          148,591  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     88,441          249,585  
<DISCONTINUED>                               0                0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0                0  
<CHANGES>                                    0                0  
<NET-INCOME>                            88,441          249,585  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.02             0.05  
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.01             0.04  
                           

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 302 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, James C. Mroczkowski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.;
 
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 9, 2004
 
 /s/ James C. Mroczkowski
--------------------------------------------------------
James C. Mroczkowski
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6804

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEVIN EUGENE JONES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-300; CA-04-1114) Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 11, 2005 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Eugene Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kevin Eugene Jones seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss his successive motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) for lack of jurisdiction. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a post-conviction proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 134931 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134931 COA: 278624 Wayne CC: 94-005655-03 DEANGELO TAJUAN JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant's motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

d1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1



ION Networks, Inc.



CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of ION Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Norman E. Corn, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date:November 19, 2007

By: /s/ Norman E. Corn



Norman E. Corn

Chief Executive Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to ION Networks, Inc. and will be retained by ION Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ex10.htm


Exhibit 10.1
JOHNNY LEE REMBERT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3047

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 19, 2017.

An appeal from an order of t he Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie M. Kinsey , Judge

.

Johnny Lee Rembert , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with instructions from the Florida Supreme Court, this cause

is remanded for resentencing in conformance with sections 775.082, 921.1401, and

921.1402, Florida Statutes. See Atwell v. State , 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016).

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the c ourt.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &

                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc. as Managing Member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC, certify that (i) he Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of
TriView Global Fund, LLC fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of TriView Global Fund, LLC.



TRIVIEW GLOBAL FUND, LLC

By:  TriView Capital Management, Inc., Managing Member



By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 30, 2010

<page>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40302 Conference Calendar

MOHAMMED MAKSUOUR RAHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UP HUBBARD, Sergeant, Et Al. Defendants, UP HUBBARD, Sergeant; UP MANN, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:95-CV-335

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mohammed Maksuour Rahman, Texas inmate #660008, challenges the grant of summary judgment for Defendants Hubbard and Mann. Rahman waived any appellate contention he might have urged concerning the dismissal of Defendants Browne and King. See Evans v. City of Marlin, Tex ., 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th Cir. 1993) (issues not raised or briefed are considered abandoned).No. 97-40302 -2-

We have independently reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. For essentially the same reasons stated by the district court, see Rahman v. Hubbard , No. 9:95cv335 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 1997), we conclude that the district court did not err in its summary-judgment determination. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Valley Commerce Bancorp
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Donald A.
Gilles, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 21, 2006
                                                  /s/ Donald A. Gilles
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                    Donald A. Gilles
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       93