alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 10394 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:04

- cr - 00303

- HES

- MCR

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Pl aintiff

- Appellee,

versus WENDELL J. BARTLEY, a.k.a. Poochie, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (September 22, 2014) Before TJOFLAT , JORDAN , and ROSENBAUM , Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

Case: 14-10394 Date Filed: 09/22/2014 Page: 1 of 22 Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Wendell J. Bartley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel ’ s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Bartley ’s conviction s and sentence s are AFFIRMED

. Case: 14-10394 Date Filed: 09/22/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32


                           Section 1350 Certifications

                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned is the Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Newsearch, Inc.
This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Newsearch, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.

The undersigned certifies that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Newsearch, Inc. as of June 30, 2005.

This Certification is executed as of June 19, 2006.

                                 /s/ Dean Wicker
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                     Dean Wicker
                                     Director, CEO, President and CFO
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to us, Inc. and will be retained by Newsearch, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2845 

To suspend temporarily the duty on metal screw type bases designed for 

high intensity discharge (HID) lamps. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on metal screw type bases 

designed for high intensity discharge (HID) lamps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METAL SCREW TYPE BASES DESIGNED FOR 

4 HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE (HID) LAMPS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Metal screw type bases designed for high intensity 

discharge (HID) lamps 

(provided for in subheading 8539.90.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2845 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 283 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 283

                For the relief of Marco Antonio Sanchez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2011

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Marco Antonio Sanchez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARCO ANTONIO SANCHEZ.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Marco 
Antonio Sanchez shall be eligible for an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Marco Antonio Sanchez enters the 
United States before the filing deadline set forth in subsection (c), 
Marco Antonio Sanchez shall be considered to have entered and remained 
lawfully in the United States and shall be eligible for adjustment to 
lawful permanent resident status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the 
application for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees not 
later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or lawful permanent resident status to Marco Antonio 
Sanchez, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 
reduce by one, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of birth of Marco Antonio Sanchez under section 202(a)(2) 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)).
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 57/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.057.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 57 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 536 March 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.057.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 57

English edition

Legislation

Volume 536 March 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 164/2010 of 25 January 2010 on the technical specifications for electronic ship reporting in inland navigation referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 164/2010 of 25 January 2010 on the technical specifications for electronic ship reporting in inland navigation referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of John Waters, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)

and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John Waters, Chief Financial Officer of Avantair,
Inc., certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Avantair, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrants other certifying officer and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 5, 2007



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ John Waters
|Name:           |  | John Waters            
|Title:          |  | Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0138 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIAM CURTIS SMALL ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 31, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening b rief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2021

12/15/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0138
Javoris Denard PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2018]

Melanie Malave, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Gerber, C.J., and Kuntz, J., concur.

Gross, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Gross, J., concurring specially.

I concur in the affirmance of the burglary and grand theft convictions.

I write only to note that there may have been ineffective assistance of both his trial and appellate counsel.

No witnesses or physical evidence placed appellant at the victim's home. The primary evidence against him was his possession of recently stolen property-the victim's computer was left in a rental car rented by appellant.

A customer service representative from the rental car company testified that a porter found the tablet computer while cleaning out a returned rental car. The representative identified the car based on some unidentified internal records which were not introduced at trial. The trial court overruled trial counsel's hearsay objection to this testimony. The porter did not testify at trial. This was not a small point-the State needed to link appellant to the car where the tablet was found to obtain a conviction.

On appeal, appellate counsel did not pursue the hearsay objection, which appears to have had some merit. As a result, the hearsay objection was waived. *See**Peterson v. State* , 94 So.3d 514, 527 (Fla. 2012). Instead, counsel briefed the issue of a confrontation clause violation, which was not an objection raised by trial counsel, so the argument was unpreserved. *See* § 90.104, Fla. Stat. (2017).

Trial counsel's potential strategic errors involve common scenarios in criminal cases. Appellant had nine prior felony convictions. To avoid impeachment by prior *846convictions, defense counsel called appellant's girlfriend as an alibi witness. She said that appellant was with her at the time the burglary was committed. In addition, under questioning by the defense attorney, she testified that *appellant told her that he rented a car for a friend, who happened to be deceased at the time of trial* . This italicized self-serving hearsay statement, in which appellant was the declarant, opened the door to impeachment of the statement by appellant's nine felony convictions. *See* § 90.806(1), Fla. Stat. (2017) ; *Gonzalez v. State* , 948 So.2d 877, 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Another questionable situation is the absence of an authentication objection to the telephone conversations during a detective's spoofed phone calls to the number listed on the car rental contract. *See* C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 901.6 (2012 ed.). Whether all of this was sound trial strategy can be explored at a hearing under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
Exhibit 21.0

List of Subsidiaries

Registrant: BV Financial, Inc.



|                                  |  |                     |   |  |                                       
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | - |  | --------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                      |  | PercentageOwnership |   |  | Jurisdiction or State of Incorporation
|Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank |  | 100                 | % |  | United States                         

Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank



|                             |  |                     |   |  |                                       
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------- | - |  | --------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                 |  | PercentageOwnership |   |  | Jurisdiction or State of Incorporation
|Housing Recovery Corporation |  | 100                 | % |  | Maryland
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARY

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Wayne Alderman, Director of Financial Operations of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2006



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ C. Wayne Alderman           
|C. Wayne Alderman               
|Director of Financial Operations
|  |  |    WONDER HomeFAQHelpContact UsSearch   |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------|

> Warning:This site is being maintained for historical purposes, but has had no new entries since October 1998. To find more recent articles, please visit the following:-  MMWR 	at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/mmwrsrch.htm 
-  CDC Web Search 	at http://www.cdc.gov/search.htm 
Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young ChildrenU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, PublicHealth Service, Centers for Disease ControlPublication date: 10/01/1991
Table of Contents
A STATEMENT BY THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION -- OCTOBER 1991
## NUMBER 13

- 2 4

- 00 154

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE JEANETTE DAIDONE AND WILLIAM ELDON FLORES

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña 1

R elator s Jeanette Daidone and William Eldon Flores filed a petition for writ of

mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by transferring venue of the

underlying case from Nueces County, Texas, to a state court located in Houston, Texas.

H owever, relators have now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case. ” ); id. R.

47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2 because the trial court has rescinded its order transferring the case . Relators thus assert

that their petition for writ of ma ndamus is moot

.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that relators’ request for

mandamus relief is moot . See In re Cont

. Freighters, Inc. , 646 S.W.3d 810, 813 (Tex.

2022) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Heckman v. Williamson County , 369 S.W.3d 137,

162 (Tex. 2012); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. , 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig.

proceeding)

. Accordingly, we grant relators’ unoppose d motion to dismiss, and we

dismiss this original proceeding as moot.

L. ARON PEÑA JR.

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

21st day of March , 202 4

.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Brooktrout, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric R. Giler, President ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

 
| Date: August 7, 2003 | By:    | /s/  ERIC  R. GILER   |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Eric  R. Giler                  |
|                 |   | *President*                     |
|                 |   | *(Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Brooktrout, Inc. and will beretained by Brooktrout, Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
# Official Journal C 62/15 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 62 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4915 March 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 62

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4915 March 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 062/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 062/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4152 — Jacobs Holding/Adecco) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 062/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4099 — EQT IV/DC Off-Highway) (1) | 3 |
| 2006/C 062/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4128 — Adecco/Deutscher Industrie Service) (1) | 3 |
| 2006/C 062/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3985 — EADS/BAES/FNM/NLFK) (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 062/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4082 — Cargill/Pagnan II) (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 062/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4132 — Lehman Brothers/Heinz European Seafood) (1) | 5 |
| 2006/C 062/8 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4081 — Fujitsu Siemens Computer Holding/Siemens Business Services) (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 062/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 062/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4152 — Jacobs Holding/Adecco) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2006/C 062/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4099 — EQT IV/DC Off-Highway) (1)

3

2006/C 062/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4128 — Adecco/Deutscher Industrie Service) (1)

3

2006/C 062/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3985 — EADS/BAES/FNM/NLFK) (1)

4

2006/C 062/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4082 — Cargill/Pagnan II) (1)

4

2006/C 062/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4132 — Lehman Brothers/Heinz European Seafood) (1)

5

2006/C 062/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4081 — Fujitsu Siemens Computer Holding/Siemens Business Services) (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN