17950 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Notices 

meaning of the split pea class, ‘‘Winter 

Split Peas.’’ The introduction of an 

amended whole dry pea class, ‘‘Mottled 

Peas,’’ which includes both spring and 

fall planted peas, requires that the 

current winter split pea definition be 

expanded to be more inclusive, and the 

descriptive classification term be 

changed to be more representative of the 

whole peas used in the production of 

this type of split pea. GIPSA believes 

that the classification term, 

‘‘Miscellaneous Split Peas,’’ would be 

appropriate. Proposed changes in the 

general definition of split peas, as well 

as the specific classification definitions, 

are also being made to bring them more 

in line with those being proposed for 

whole dry peas. 

Proposed GIPSA Action 

GIPSA is proposing to revise select 

descriptive classification terms and 

definitions to allow new and future 

winter dry pea releases to be marketed 

as smooth yellow or green dry peas, and 

preserve purity of class by grouping 

colored or distinctively mottled peas 

(i.e., traditional winter dry and maple 

peas), regardless of planting date. GIPSA 

is proposing to revise the definitions for 

the following classes as follows: 

1. ‘‘Whole Dry Peas.’’ Threshed seeds 

of the garden type pea plant (Pisum 

sativum L. and Pisum sativum var. 

arvense (L.) Poir.) which after the 

removal of dockage, contain 50 percent 

or more of whole peas and not more 

than 10.0 percent of foreign material. 

2. ‘‘Smooth Yellow Dry Peas.’’ Dry 

peas which have smooth seed coats and 

yellow cotyledons and contain not more 

than 1.5 percent of other classes. 

3. ‘‘Smooth Green Dry Peas.’’ Dry peas 

which have smooth seed coats and 

green cotyledons and contain not more 

than 1.5 percent of other classes. 

4. ‘‘Wrinkled Dry Peas.’’ Dry peas 

which have wrinkled seed coats and 

contain not more than 1.5 percent of 

other classes. 

5. ‘‘Split Peas.’’ Threshed seeds of the 

garden type pea plant (Pisum sativum L. 

and Pisum sativum var. arvense (L.) 

Poir.) which have 50 percent or more of 

the peas split into halves or smaller 

pieces and contain not more than 10.0 

percent of foreign material. 

6. ‘‘Green Split Peas.’’ Split peas from 

smooth green dry pea varieties. 

7. ‘‘Yellow Split Peas.’’ Split peas 

from smooth yellow dry pea varieties. 

In addition, GIPSA proposes to 

replace the classification term and 

definition of ‘‘Winter Dry Peas’’ and 

‘‘Winter Split Peas’’ with ‘‘Mottled Dry 

Peas’’ and ‘‘Miscellaneous Split Peas,’’ 

respectively. The proposed changes read 

as follows: 

1. ‘‘Mottled Dry Peas.’’ Dry peas of the 

Austrian winter pea type and other peas 

which have colored or distinctively 

mottled seed coats which contain not 

more than 1.5 percent of other classes. 

2. ‘‘Miscellaneous Split Peas.’’ Split 

peas from classes of whole peas other 

than smooth green or smooth yellow dry 

pea varieties. 

Taking into account the nature of the 

proposed changes, GIPSA will solicit 

comments for 30 days in order to help 

facilitate the marketing of whole dry 

peas and split peas. 

All comments received will be 

considered by GIPSA before final action 

is taken on the proposal. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627. 

Alan R. Christian, 

Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, 

Packers and Stockyards Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–9017 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–008] 

Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel 

Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Final 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation, a 

domestic interested party, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain circular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Taiwan. This 

review covers one firm, Yieh Hsing 

Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Hsing), for the 

period May 1, 2007, through April 30, 

2008. No interested party commented 

on the Department’s intent to rescind 

this review based upon its 

determination that the party subject to 

this review did not have entries of 

subject merchandise during the period 

of review (POR) on which to assess 

antidumping duties. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1131 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 21, 2009, the Department 

published a notice of its intent to 

rescind this administrative review. See 

Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel 

Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Notice of 

Intent to Rescind Administrative 

Review, 74 FR 3559 (January 21, 2009) 

(Intent to Rescind). We invited 

interested parties to comment on our 

preliminary intent to rescind this review 

based upon our determination that the 

party subject to this review did not have 

entries during the POR on which to 

assess antidumping duties. No 

interested party submitted comments. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is certain circular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Taiwan, which are 

defined as: welded carbon steel pipes 

and tubes, of circular cross section, with 

walls not thinner than 0.065 inch, and 

0.375 inch or more but not over 4.5 

inches in outside diameter, currently 

classified under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

item numbers 7306.30.5025, 

7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and 

7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Rescission of Administrative Review 

The Department issued the Intent to 

Rescind because it was satisfied that 

there were no U.S. entries of subject 

merchandise from the respondent, Yieh 

Hsing, during the POR as indicated by 

the record. See Intent to Rescind, 74 FR 

at 3560. As the Department received no 

comments on its intent to rescind this 

review, it continues to find that 

rescission of the review is appropriate. 

Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d), the Department is 

rescinding this review. 

Assessment 

The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days 

after the date of publication of this 

rescission of administrative review. 

Because Yieh Hsing certified that it 

made no POR shipments of subject 

merchandise for which it had 

knowledge of U.S. destination, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of 

merchandise produced by Yieh Hsing at 

the all–others rate established in the 

less–than-fair–value investigation if 

there is no rate for the exporter involved 

in the transaction. See Antidumping 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Notices 17951 

and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). See also 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

India: Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 73 FR 77610, 77612 (December 

19, 2008). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers for whom this review is 

being rescinded, of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: April 13, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–9018 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension 

of Time Limit for the Final Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Stolz or Sergio Balbontı ́n, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4474 or (202) 482– 

6478. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published an 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on 

January 4, 2005. See Notice of Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 

Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture 

From the People’s Republic of China, 70 

FR 329 (January 4, 2005). On March 7, 

2008, the Department published notices 

of the initiation of the antidumping duty 

administrative review and new shipper 

reviews of WBF from the PRC for the 

period January 1, 2007, through 

December 31, 2007. See Notice of 

Initiation of Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 12387 

(March 7, 2008) and Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture From the People’s Republic of 

China; Initiation of New Shipper 

Reviews, 73 FR 12392 (March 7, 2008). 

On August 22, 2008, the Department 

aligned the deadlines and the time 

limits of the new shipper reviews with 

the administrative review. See 

Memorandum to the File ‘‘Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China: Alignment of the 1/ 

1/2007 – 12/31/2007 Annual 

Administrative Review and the 1/1/ 

2007 – 12/31/2007 New Shipper 

Review,’’ dated August 22, 2008. On 

February 9, 2009, the Department 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review and the new 

shipper reviews. See Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative and 

New Shipper Reviews and Partial 

Rescission of Review, 74 FR 6372 

(February 9, 2009). The final results of 

the administrative and new shipper 

reviews are currently due no later than 

June 9, 2009. 

Extension of Time Limit of Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to issue the 

final results of an administrative review 

within 120 days after the date on which 

the preliminary results are published. 

However, if it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time period to a maximum of 180 days. 

Completion of the final results of these 

reviews within the 120-day period is not 

practicable because the Department will 

conduct verification in the 

administrative review and one new 

shipper review after publication of the 

preliminary results and, therefore, needs 

additional time to complete verification 

reports, to provide an opportunity for 

comments by interested parties, and to 

analyze these comments by interested 

parties on the preliminary results and 

verification reports, and analyze 

information gathered at verification. 

Because it is not practicable to complete 

these reviews within the time specified 

under the Act, we are fully extending 

the time period for issuing the final 

results of the administrative and new 

shipper reviews in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Therefore, the final results will be due 

August 8, 2009, which is 180 days from 

publication of the preliminary results. 

Because August 8, 2009, falls on a 

Saturday, however, the final results are 

now due on the next business day, 

Monday, August 10, 2009. This notice is 

published pursuant to sections 751(a) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: April 13, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–9042 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–533–820) 

Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from India: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 19, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the 

preliminary results of the antidumping 

duty administrative review of certain 

hot-rolled carbon steel flat products 

from India. See Certain Hot-Rolled 

Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: 

Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 73 FR 77618 (December 19, 

2008) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The 

review covers one respondent, Essar 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES