alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10982 Summary Calendar

RICHARD ALLEN SWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LAWRENCE KENNEDY, Senior Pastor, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-2731-T

- - - - - - - - - - June 12, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Richard Allen Swartz, Texas inmate #9610-5238, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA). The PLRA requires a prisoner appealing IFP in a civil action to pay the full amount of the filing fee, $105. As Swartz does not have funds for immediate payment of this fee, he is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $57.17, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).No. 96-10982 - 2 - Following payment of the initial partial filing fee, funds shall be deducted from Swartz’s prisoner account until the full filing fee is paid. See § 1915(b)(2). IT IS ORDERED that Swartz pay the appropriate initial filing fee to the Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Swartz shall authorize the appropriate prison authorities to withdraw this fee from his trust fund account in accordance with their policy and local procedures and to forward the fee to the Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of Swartz’s inmate account shall collect the remainder of the $105 filing fee and forward for payment, in accordance with § 1915(b)(2), to the Clerk of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas each time the amount in Swartz’s account exceeds $10, until the appellate filing fee is paid. Swartz challenges the district court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). He argues that the court erred by failing to consider his attempts to amend his complaint and analyze the complaint for claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 2000-bb; the Uniform Commercial Code; the tort of fraud; and the First and Fifth Amendments. Even if the court had considered the allegations in light of these possible causes of action, no harm ensued. We have carefully reviewed the appellate record, and we conclude that Swartz’s asserted claims are legallyNo. 96-10982 - 3 - frivolous because they have no arguable basis in federal law. They also fail to state a claim for which relief can be granted.

This appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We note the warning given to Swartz in the related appeal, Swartz v. Texas Bd. of Pardons & Paroles , No. 96- 11047 (5th Cir. _____, 1997), concerning the consequences of future frivolous appeals. Swartz’s remaining motions are hereby
DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED. IFP GRANTED. INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE ASSESSED. OTHER MOTIONS DENIED.
EXHIBIT 21.1
 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 21  SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
  Name
    
    State of IncorporationConsolidated Communications, Inc.
    
    IllinoisConsolidated Communications of Texas Company
    
    TexasConsolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company
    
    TexasConsolidated Communications Services Company
    
    TexasConsolidated Communications Enterprise Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareConsolidated Communications of Pennsylvania, LLC
    
    DelawareEast Texas Fiber Line, Incorporated (63% ownership)
    
    TexasIllinois Consolidated Telephone Company
    
    IllinoisMulti, Inc. (50% ownership)
    
    Pennsylvania
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 276 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 276

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for the study of the 
                     Pike National Historic Trail.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2011

   Mr. Bennet (for himself and Mr. Udall of Colorado) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for the study of the 
                     Pike National Historic Trail.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pike National Historic Trail Study 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. WESTERN STATES TRAIL STUDY.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(46) Pike national historic trail.--The Pike National 
        Historic Trail, a series of routes extending approximately 
        3,664 miles, which follows the route taken by Lt. Zebulon 
        Montgomery Pike during the 1806-1807 Pike expedition that began 
        in Fort Bellefontaine, Missouri, extended through portions of 
        the States of Kansas, Nebraska, Colorado, New Mexico, and 
        Texas, and ended in Natchitoches, Louisiana.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, J. Peter Farquhar, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Tarpon Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2005    /s/ J. Peter Farquhar   J. Peter Farquhar, Chief Executive Officer
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sound Revolution Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Dated: June 11, 2007 | /s/ Penny Green        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Penny Green,           
|                     | Chief Financial Officer

---
# Official Journal L 28/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.028.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 28 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5330 January 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.028.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 28

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5330 January 2010

---

| Contents | | IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 2010/36/EC |
| | * | Council Decision of 29 April 2008 concerning the signing and conclusion of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part | 1 |
| Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part | 2 |

Contents

IV   Acts adopted before 1 December 2009 under the EC Treaty, the EU Treaty and the Euratom Treaty

page

2010/36/EC

*

Council Decision of 29 April 2008 concerning the signing and conclusion of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part

1

Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part

2

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2825 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2825

           To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Red 1:1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To extend the suspension of duty on Basic Red 1:1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC RED 1:1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.23 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Basic Red 1:1) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2561 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2561

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain educational toys 
                              or devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain educational toys 
                              or devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL TOYS OR DEVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subheading 9902.85.43 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain educational toys or 
devices) is amended in the effective period column, by striking ``12/
31/2011'' and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2925 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2925

  To suspend temporarily the duty on polymer, caprolactone-diethylene 
                                glycol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on polymer, caprolactone-diethylene 
                                glycol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYMER, CAPROLACTONE-DIETHYLENE GLYCOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Polymer,            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        caprolactone-                                                      31/2015.......
                        diethylene glycol
                        (CAS No. 36890-68-
                        3) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3907.99.0150)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Companys Report of Dynamic Gold Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim
Coupland, Principal Executive and I, Ann-Marie Cederholm, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

/ s / Tim CouplandTim Coupland, Principal Executive
Officer September 12, 2007

/ s / Ann-Marie CederholmAnn-Marie Cederholm,
Principal Financial Officer September 12, 2007
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2918 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of Imazalil and 

application adjuvants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures 

of Imazalil and application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF IMAZALIL AND APPLICATION AD4 JUVANTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.38.09 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 mixtures of Imazalil and application adjuvants) is amend8 ed by striking the date in the effective period column and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2918 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-09-012]


Government In the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: April 23, 2009 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1149 (Final)(Circular Welded Carbon Quality 
Steel Line Pipe from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is 
currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' 
opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before May 6, 2009.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:
    Issued: April 13, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
 [FR Doc. E9-8744 Filed 4-13-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7842

RICHARD LAMAR FENSTERMACHER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

R. ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF

VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-96-215-R)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 6, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, Appellant Pro Se. Wirt Peebles Marks,

IV, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Fenstermacher v. Angelone, No. CA-96-215-R (W.D. Va. Nov.

20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

----

| Company                              | State of Organization | Ultimate Parent          | Immediate Parent         | % Ownership |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------|-------------|
| Two Rivers Water Company             | CO                    |                     |                     |        |
| TRWC, Inc.                           | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | Two Rivers Water Company | 100         |
| HCIC Holdings, LLC                   | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | TRWC, Inc.               | 100         |
| Huerfano-Cucharas Irrigation Company | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | HCIC Holdings            | 91          |
| Two Rivers Water LLC                 | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | Two Rivers Water Company | 100         |
| Two Rivers Farms LLC                 | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | Two Rivers Water Company | 100         |
| Two Rivers Farms F-1 LLC             | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | Two Rivers Water Company | 100         |
| Two Rivers Energy LLC                | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | Two Rivers Water Company | 100         |
| Northsight, Inc.                     | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | Two Rivers Water Company | 98          |
| Southie Developments LLC             | CO                    | Two Rivers Water Company | Northsight, Inc.         | 98          |

----

----