T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T G A LEN LLO Y D H O U SER, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C A R O N G R A N T - E L L I S ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16492 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 9 3 7 - G MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona G . M urr a yS now , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 ** B efo re: W A R D L A W , C L IF T O N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A ri zona st at e pri soner G al en L l oyd H ou se r app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s di s m i s s a l or de ra nd s um m a ryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng de l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e t o hi s s e r i ous m e di c a l ne e ds . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo adi s m i s s a l unde r28 U . S . C . § 1915A 

# FI LED SEP 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 16492 2 f o rf a ilu r e to s ta te ac la im , R es ni ck v. H ayes , 21 3 F . 3d 44 3, 44 7 (9th C i r. 20 00 ), a n dth e e n tryo f

s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, T

oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f

f i rm. T h e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly d ism isse dd ef en d an t B aird b ec au se H o u se r’s a lle g a tio n s p r e d ic a te liab ilitys o le lyu p o n B a ir d ’s s u p e rv is o rys ta tu s . See B arre n v. H arr i ngton , 152 F . 3d 1193, 1194 ( 9th C i r . 1998) ( or de r ) ( “ L i abi l i tyunde r§ 1983 m u s t b e b a s e do n th e p e r s o n a l in v o lv e m e n t o f th e d e f e n d a n t.” ) . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed defendantM cM orran b ec ause H ou se r f a i l e d t o a l l e ge f

a c t s s how i ng tha tM c M orr an kne w of a nd di s r e ga r de d a n e xc e s s i ve ri sk t o h i s hea l th o r thatM cM orran’ s a l l eged fai l ure t o actw as anythi ng m ore than negl i gence. Se e T

oguc hi , 3 9 1 F .3 da t 1 0 5 8 - 5 9 ( ap r is o n o f f ic ia l a c ts w ith d el i b erat e i n d i fferen ce o n l y i f h e o r sh e k n o w s o f an dd i sreg ard s an ex cessi v e ri sk to th e p r is o n e r ’s h e a lth a n ds a f e ty ; n e g lig e n c e is in s u f

f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e ) . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm entbecause H ou se r f ai l ed t o r a i s e age nui ne di s put e of m a t e r i a l f

a c ta s t o w he the rde f

e nda nt s G r a nt - E l l i s a nd S al ye r w er e del i bera t el y i nd i ff er entt o H ou se r’ s m edi ca l cond i t i on of se vere p s o r ia s is . Se e i d. ; H

al le t t v . Mor gan , 29 6 F . 3d 73 2, 74 4-46 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( del ay11- 16492 3 of m edi ca l tre atm entdo es no tconst i tut e del i bera t e i nd i ff er ence un l es s the del ayl ed t o further i nj ury) . W e do notc ons i de ri s s ue s nots pe c i f i c a l l yr a i s e d a nd ar gue d i n the ope ni ng bri ef and the addend um t o the op eni ng bri ef , no r argum ent s and al l egat i on s r ai se d f o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. Se e P adge t t v . W r i ght , 58 7 F . 3d 98 3, 98 5 n . 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c uri am ). H ous e r ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d i n de ny i ng hi s r e que s tf or ap p o in te dc o u n s e l is u n p e r s u a s iv e . H o u s e r ’s p e titio n f

o rth e r e d r e s s o f

g r ie v a n c e s , r e c e iv e do n J u n e 2 2 , 2 0 1 2 , is or de rf i l e d a nd de ni e d. AF F I RME D.