alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00416

- CR

MIGUEL OSORIO
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20FC

- 0878A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
February 8, 2024
##### 



Exhibit 10.15
 TERMINATION AGREEMENT
 (Technical Services Agreement
 st
  JMG EXPLORATION, INC., a corporation
having an office in Calgary, Alberta (JMG)
   JED OIL INC., a corporation having an
office in Calgary, Alberta (JED)
   A.
    
    The parties are the parties to the Technical Services Agreement dated effective January 1,
2004 between JMG and JED; andB.
    
    the parties desire to enter into this Termination Agreement to provide for the termination of
such agreement;
  1.
    
    Termination of Agreement
  2.
    
    Enurement
   JMG EXPLORATION, INC.
    
    
    
    
    
    JED OIL INC.Per:
    
    /s/
Herman S. Hartley
    
    
    
    Per:
    

/s/
Thomas J. JacobsenHerman S. Hartley, President/CEO
    
    
    
    
    
    Thomas J. Jacobsen, CEOPer:
    

/s/
Joanne R. Finnerty
    
    
    
    Per:
    

/s/
Bruce A. StewartJoanne R. Finnerty, CFO
    
    
    
    
    
    Bruce A. Stewart, Secretary/CFO
Richard HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2124

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jarnail Sihota and GTHCC, Inc., * From the 385th District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CV57400.

Vs. No. 11-21-00171-CV *December 30, 2022

City of Midland * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of 

this appeal are taxed against Jarnail Sihota and GTHCC, Inc.
Exhibit 10.6.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
FOR UNION BANKSHARES
(As Restated Effective January 1, 2018)
Pursuant to subparagraph 12.1(b), the Administrator hereby adopts the following amendment to the Virginia Bankers Association Model Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the companion document to the Adoption Agreement for the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan for Union Bankshares):
1.A new subparagraph 7.4(d) is added to the Plan to clarify payment rules if death occurs after commencement of periodic installment, to read as follows effective as of January 1, 2018:
7.4(d) In the event that a Participant who has begun to receive periodic installment payments dies, the amounts of any periodic installments remaining unpaid shall be paid to his Beneficiary over the remaining term certain for such installments.
This First Amendment is adopted by the Plan Sponsor as Administrator on this 20th day of August, 2018.
​
Union Bankshares
Plan Sponsor
​
​
By: /s/ Loreen Lagatta​ ​​ ​​ ​  (SEAL)
Its:EVP and Chief Human Resource Officer
​
​
Attest:
​
/s/ Rachael Lape​ ​​ ​​ ​
Its:General Counsel and SVP

​
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1164 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to authorize the 

Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, 

to enter into contracts, grants, and agreements to carry out certain 

ecosystem restoration activities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Mr. LUJA ́N (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to 

authorize the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through 

the Chief of the Forest Service, to enter into contracts, 

grants, and agreements to carry out certain ecosystem 

restoration activities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seedlings for Sustain5 able Habitat Restoration Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1164 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONTRACTS, GRANTS, AND AGREEMENTS TO CARRY 

2 OUT CERTAIN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AC3 TIVITIES. 

4 (a) CONTRACTS, GRANTS, AND AGREEMENTS.—Sec5 tion 40804 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 

6 (16 U.S.C. 6592a) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(g) CONTRACTS, GRANTS, AND AGREEMENTS.—To 

9 carry out the ecosystem restoration activities described in 

10 subsection (b), the Secretary of Agriculture, acting 

11 through the Chief of the Forest Service, may enter into 

12 contracts, grants, or agreements with State forestry agen13 cies, local private or nonprofit entities, institutions of 

14 higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the High15 er Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))), and 

16 multistate coalitions— 

17 ‘‘(1) for the collection and maintenance of na18 tive seeds, including material from managed seed or19 chards; and 

20 ‘‘(2) for the production of seedlings for revege21 tation.’’. 

22 (b) COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORA23 TION PROGRAM.—Section 4003(b)(7) of the Omnibus 

24 Public Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 

25 7303(b)(7)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1164 IS

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 by inserting ‘‘the collection and maintenance of na3 tive seeds for revegetation, the production of seed4 lings, and’’ after ‘‘or agreements for’’; 

5 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) 

6 through (D) as subparagraphs (C) through (E), re7 spectively; and 

8 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(B) institutions of higher education (as 

11 defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Edu12 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)));’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document

Exhibit 4.4


PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
50 North Third Street
Post Office Box 3500
Newark, Ohio 43058-3500
(740) 349-8451
www.parknationalcorp.com


February 24, 2022






United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549




Re:     Park National Corporation
Commission File Number:  1-13006
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year
Ended December 31, 2021


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (“Park”), is today filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Park for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (“Park's 2021 Form 10-K”).
Neither (i) Park nor (ii) any of Park's consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument or agreement with respect to its long-term debt under which the total amount of long-term debt authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of Park and Park's subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  In accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Park hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each instrument or agreement defining (i) the rights of holders of long-term debt of Park or (ii) the rights of holders of long-term debt of a consolidated subsidiary of Park, in each case which is not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to Park's 2021 Form 10-K.


Very truly yours,
PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
/s/ Brady T. Burt                                                      
Brady T. Burt
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-40684, 33-79294, 333-03949,333-03951, 333-03953, 333-42546 and 333-105796) of Lifeline Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 11, 2005
STATE EX REL. Richard RAY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-1887

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2470 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2470

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for the more accurate 
    and complete enumeration of members of the Armed Forces in any 
 tabulation of total population by the Secretary of Commerce, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

    Mr. Paul (for himself and Mr. Udall of Colorado) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for the more accurate 
    and complete enumeration of members of the Armed Forces in any 
 tabulation of total population by the Secretary of Commerce, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Service Members and Communities 
Count Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVED ENUMERATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES IN ANY 
              TABULATION OF TOTAL POPULATION BY SECRETARY OF COMMERCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g) Effective beginning with the 2020 decennial census of 
population, in taking any tabulation of total population by States, the 
Secretary shall take appropriate measures to ensure, to the maximum 
extent practicable, that all members of the Armed Forces deployed 
abroad on the date of taking such tabulation are--
            ``(1) fully and accurately counted; and
            ``(2) properly attributed to the State in which their 
        permanent duty station or homeport is located on such date.''.
    (b) Construction.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall not 
be construed to affect the residency status of any member of the Armed 
Forces under any provision of law other than title 13, United States 
Code.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133553(243)(247) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ROSA WOODS, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133553 

 COA: 256394 
 Wayne CC: 95-508913-CZ

WILLIAMS & SON PLUMBING 

& HEATING, INC., a Michigan

Corporation; RICK WILLIAMS,

Individually, a/k/a RECARDO 

WILLIAMS, Individually, and 

THEODIS THOMAS, Individually, 

Jointly, and Severally,

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 30, 2007 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED. 

d1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary of Defense

          - [Docket ID: USAF-2009-0025]

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to delete a system of records.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete a system of records to its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

The changes will be effective on May 18, 2009 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Officer, Office of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer, SAF/XCPPI, 1800 Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220, Washington, DC 20330-1800.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696-6648.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Air Force systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

                    The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete a system of records notice in its inventory of record systems                           ( print page 17665)                        subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.                

Morgan E. Frazier,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## F036 AFPC I

### System name:

Airmen Utilization Records System (June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793).

### Reason:

This is a duplicate system that is now merged with F036 AFPC M, Officer Utilization Records System (June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793). There should be only one system for Utilization Records System.

[FR Doc. E9-8715 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
BEFORE THE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Docket

Docket DOT-OST-2013-0214 

MOTION OF AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS, S.A.U.

TO STRIKE COMMENTS

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Aaron A. Goerlich

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

1200 New Hampshire Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20036-6802

Tel (202) 776-3974

Fax (202) 776-3975

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com

Counsel for Air Europa Lineas

 Aereas, S.A.U.

March 10, 2014

BENJAMIN EDELMAN,

Third-Party Complainant

v.

AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS, S.A.U.,

Respondent

 
BEFORE THE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Docket

 

Docket DOT-OST-2013-0214

MOTION OF AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS, S.A.U.

TO STRIKE COMMENTS

Air Europa Líneas Aéreas, S.A.U., pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules of Practice, 

moves to strike the comments filed in this docket by Mike Borsetti and Edward 

Hasbrouck. Neither commenter is a party to this proceeding, and neither has submitted 

a motion for leave to file. The comments are not authorized under the Department’s 

rules and should be stricken for that reason alone.

Further, even if the comments are accepted, they add nothing material to the 

record. The Hasbrouck submission is essentially an argument for regulatory changes

that have not been proposed by the Department or in any rulemaking petition. The

Borsetti comment is speculative, conclusory, and devoid of new information. 

Note additionally that Rule 416 of the Rules of Practice does not contemplate 

appearances by non-parties prior to issuance of an Assistant General Counsel decision 

BENJAMIN EDELMAN,

Third-Party Complainant

v.

AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS, S.A.U.,

Respondent
under Rule 406(a). Section 300.5(b) of the Department’s Rules of Conduct, 14 CFR §

300.5(b), states that no person shall disrupt or interfere with the fair and orderly 

disposition of a DOT proceeding. In combination, these rules compel the conclusion 

that the unauthorized comments are an attempt to disrupt or interfere with an orderly 

disposition of this proceeding.

Both comments should be stricken for the reasons stated above.

Respectfully submitted,

Aaron A. Goerlich

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

Counsel for Air Europa Lineas

 Aereas, S.A.U.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on March 10, 2014, I served the foregoing motion by electronic mail 

upon:

Mike Borsetti (mike@borsetti.com)

Benjamin Edelman (ben@benedelman.org) 

Edward Hasbrouck (edward@hasbrouck.org)

 _______________________________

Aaron A. Goerlich
John W. PAYNE, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Unknown Tenant I; Unknown Tenant II, and any unknown heirs, devisees, grantees, creditors, and other unknown persons or unknown spouses claiming by, through and under any of the above-named Defendants, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-2868

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2004-J7
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-J7


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                       Dated: March 29, 2005
------------------------


JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                  Dated: March 29, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2614 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2614

         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ethyl 2-
                     (Isocyanatosulfonyl)benzoate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Coons introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ethyl 2-
                     (Isocyanatosulfonyl)benzoate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHYL 2-(ISOCYANATOSULFONYL)BENZOATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.96 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ethyl 2-
(Isocyanatosulfonyl)benzoate) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 370/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.370.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 370 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5617 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.370.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 370

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5617 December 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2013/C 370/01 | Opinion No 3/2013 (pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU) on the proposal for a Council Regulation on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2013/C 370/01

Opinion No 3/2013 (pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU) on the proposal for a Council Regulation on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 11th European Development Fund

(pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN