alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.0

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his or her capacity as an officer
of Energy Partners, Ltd. (the "Company"), that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company
at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.

These certifications shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Energy Partners, Ltd. and will be
retained by Energy Partners, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                           /s/ Richard A. Bachmann
                           --------------------------------
                                 Richard A. Bachmann
                                 Chairman, President
                            and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 5, 2004

                              /s/ Suzanne V. Baer
                              -----------------------------
                                   Suzanne V. Baer
                              Executive Vice President
                            and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 5, 2004
Tisen K. WASHINGTON, DOC# R53166, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-582

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NO. 07-05-0208-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JULY 22, 2005

______________________________

CURTIS BERNARD ROBBINS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 49,315-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following a plea of not guilty, a jury convicted appellant Curtis Bernard Robbins of

improper photography or visual recording and assessed punishment at two years in a state

jail facility. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 21.15(b) (Vernon 2003). Sentence was imposed on
1Appellant may have recourse by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus

returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. Tex.

Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).

2

March 9, 2005, and no motion for new trial was filed. On June 7, 2005, appellant filed a

notice of appeal challenging his conviction. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

A defendant must file a written notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within 30

days after the date sentence is imposed. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c) & 26.2(a)(1). The Rules

of Appellate Procedure provide for a 15-day extension in which to file the notice of appeal

if it is accompanied by a motion for extension of time. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 & 10.5(b)(2).

This Court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal and can take no action

other than to dismiss if an appeal is not timely perfected. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d

208, 210 (Tex.Cr.App. 1998).

Appellant’s sentence was imposed on March 9, 2005; thus, the deadline for filing the

notice of appeal was April 8, 2005, or 15 days thereafter if accompanied by a compliant

motion for extension of time. The notice of appeal filed on June 7, 2005, is untimely and

does not invoke our jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.1

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Do not publish.
### Swanson. Brian (OST)

From: Steven [stevenkellogg @wvwconsulting.com] 

### Sent: Thursday, February25,201012:47 PM 

### To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

### Cc: Swanson, Brian (OST); news@pressrepublican.com 

### Subject: The Threatto Cape Air in Plattsburgh

As a resident ofthe greater Plattburgh area, Iwas appalled to read in the Plattsburgh-Republican thatthe legislature has indicated that Colgan Air is a preferable alternative to Cape Air, which has been the most positive addition to the Plattsburgh Airport since it opened! I havefriends and business associates who have cometosee me using CapeAir and who have raved about the qualityof it's service, reliability, and efficiency, which has been mypersonal experience as well. I saw the Frontline special exposing the ineptitude and unprofessionalism of Colgan, and I cannot protest strongly enough their introduction into our airport. Please do not allow this to happen! Let us keep Cape Air sothat wecan utilize the airport and not beforced to go to Albany or Burlington! Thank-you for giving this matter every possible consideration. Steven Kellogg, Essex, New York

Steven Kellogg stevenkellogg @wvw.consulting.com

1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A K / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ULI SS ES M ON TE S- GU TI ER RE Z, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 08- 50511 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c r - 0 1 1 0 9 - R GK ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R . G a ryK l aus ne r , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , a n dM . S M I T H , C ir c u it J u d g e s . U l i ss es M on t es -G ut i erre z app ea l s f rom the 46 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for bei ng an i l l egal al i en foun d i n the U ni t ed S t a t e s f ol l ow i ng de port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326( a ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED MA R 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA K / Res ea r ch 08- 50511 2 j ur i s di c t i on pur s ua ntt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e a f f i rm , butr e m a nd t o c orr e c tthe ju d g m e n t. M o n t e s - G u t i e rr e z c o n t e n d s th a tth e d i s tr i c tc o u rtv i o l a t e dFe d . R. Cr i m. P. 32 by( 1) de ny i ng hi m hi s r i ghtof a l l oc ut i on; a nd ( 2) f

a i l i ng t o ve r i f

yw he the rhe ha d r e a d a nd r e vi e w e d the pr e s e nt e nc e i nve s t i ga t i on r e portw i th hi s a tt orne y . T he r e c or d i ndi c a t e s tha ta nye rr orw a s ha rm l e s s be c aus e the di s tr i c tc ourti m pos e d the s e n t e n c e t o w h i c h th e p a rt i e s s t i p u l a t e di n M o n t e s - G u t i e rr e z ’ s Fe d . R. Cr i m. P. 1 1 ( c ) ( 1 ) ( C ) p le aa g r e e m e n t. See U ni ted States v. O rtega-L op ez , 988 F . 2d 70, 72- 7 3 ( 1 9 9 3 ) ; see a l

so U n i ted S ta tes v. So l tero , 51 0 F . 3d 85 8, 86 3 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( per curi am ). I n a c c or da nc e w i th U

ni ted States v. R i ve ra-San chez , 222 F . 3d 1057, 1062 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , w e r e m a n d th e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e in c o rr e c t r e f e r e n c e to § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) . See U ni ted States v. H erre ra-B lan co , 2 3 2 F .3 d 7 1 5 , 7 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( r e m a n d in g s u as p o n te to del et e the re fe re nce t o § 13 26 (b)) . A F F IR M E D ; R E M A N D E D to corre ctth e j u d gm en t.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,189]


Fairfield Chair Company Plant 2 Lenoir, NC; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in response to a 
worker petition filed by workers of Fairfield Chair Company, Plant 2, 
Lenoir, North Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8917 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
ex10-28.htm


 


Exhibit 10.28













 




  





1  











  









 


 




  





2  











  









 




  





3  











  









 




  





4  











  






5
10.2.1 Overview DOE calculatedthe cumulative incremental energy savings fr chpotential transformer efficiency standard relative to a base-ca e scena!lo no standard. Itcalculated NES, in units ofquads, throughout the orecast period for standards that it assumed will be effective in 2016. The NES calculation started with estimates oftransfOlmer shipments and stocks (inservice transformers), which are outputs ofthe shipments model (chapter 9). DOE then obtained estimates oftransfOlmer energy losses from the 

### Lee analysis (chapter 

### 8), and calculated the total energy use bythe stock oftransfOlmers for each yea!' for both a base case and a standards case. In each standards case, as more efficient transfOlmers replace less efficient ones that retire from service, the energy per unit capacity used bythe stock oftransfOlmers gradually decreases relative to the base case. DOE used a site-to-source conversion factor to convert the amount of energy used by the transfOlmers into the amount ofenergy consumed at the source ofelectricity generation (the source energy).The site-Io-source conversion factor accounts for transmission, distribution, and generation losses. For each year analyzed, the difference in source energy use between the base case and the standards scenario is the annual energy savings. DOE summed the annual energy savings from 2016 through 2045 to calculate the total NES for the forecast period. .L"'1-f$ In calculating the NES, DOE did not assume any trends in transformer name-plate efficiency besides the incremental improvement indicated by the 

### Lee calculation. In examining proprietary shipments data providedbythe transformer industry, DOE found that the data revealed no conclusive trends in improved efficiency. Decidingthat fj'tUF@ @fiisiell.c),**trell.d~** generally are indetenninate, DOE chose to use fixed baselin" efficiency. DOE also assunled that

- the efficiency oftransformel; does not degrade overtime. Therefore the annual energy savings can be described in terms ofan affected stock, asdescribed in section 9.3.11 ofthe shipments chapter. Annual energy savings therefore are described by the following equation.
Where:

sum.
Where: AES(y) = (UECBase - UECSld) x AfCStock(y) AES(y) 

## = UECBase 

## = UECSld AfCStock(y) the annual energy savings in yeary, the site unit energy consumption for the base case, the site unit energy consumption for the standards case, and the stock oftransformers ofall vintages that are operational in yeary. Given the annual energy savings, the cumulative NES can then be calculated as a simple

Sld ,.em· SiteToSource(y) = AEC 

### NES=**J:;~ftd v"** **rSjteToSol1rce(y)** 

### XAEC(y)
the year standards come into effect, the site-to-source conversion factor in yeary, and the**annu~** energy consumption. 10-5 DRAFT
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[USCG-2009-0219]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Chelsea River, Chelsea and East 
Boston, MA, Maintenance

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
Chelsea Street Bridge across the Chelsea River, mile 1.2, between 
Chelsea and East Boston, Massachusetts. This deviation allows the 
bridge to remain in the closed position for nine hours to facilitate 
bridge maintenance. Vessels that can pass under the draw without a 
bridge opening may do so at all times.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 8 p.m. on April 25, 2009, 
through 5 a.m. on April 26, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-0219 and are available online 
at http://www.regulations.gov. They are also available for inspection 
or copying at two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays; and 
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch Office, 408 Atlantic 
Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John McDonald, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, at (617) 223-8364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Massachusetts Highway Department, 
requested this temporary deviation to facilitate a power supply 
relocation project. The Chelsea Street Bridge, across the Chelsea River 
at mile 1.2, between Chelsea and East Boston, Massachusetts, has a 
vertical clearance in the closed position of 9 feet at mean high water 
and 19 feet at mean low water. The bridge opens on signal as required 
by 33 CFR 117.593.
    This deviation allows the bridge to remain closed from 8 p.m. on 
April 25, 2009 through 5 a.m. on April 26, 2009. Vessels able to pass 
under the closed draw may do so at any time.
    The waterway is primarily used by deep draft tankers, tugs and 
barge units. Waterway users were advised of the requested bridge 
closure period and offered no objection.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the bridge must return to its 
regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated 
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is 
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: March 30, 2009.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9-8305 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven B. Solomon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of CT Holdings Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of CT Holdings, Inc.


By: /s/STEVEN B. SOLOMON
------------------------
Steven B. Solomon
Chief Executive Officer
November 17, 2006


I, Rich Connelly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of CT Holdings Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of CT Holdings, Inc.


By: /s/RICHARD CONNELLY
-----------------------
Richard Connelly
Chief Financial Officer
November 17, 2006
Exhibit 32.1 - CEO Certification

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 906
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom L. Kirchner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ T. L. KIRCHNER     
|Tom L. Kirchner        
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  May 12, 2009
# Official Journal C 177/29 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 177 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6529 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 177

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6529 April 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 177/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 177/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 6 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 177/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 177/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 177/03 | State aid – Greece – State aid SA.57538 (2020/FC) – Alleged illegal State aid to ELTA – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 177/03

State aid – Greece – State aid SA.57538 (2020/FC) – Alleged illegal State aid to ELTA – Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 73 (Friday, April 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, NIMH/ARMY RFA Project.
    Date: May 1, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference 
Call)
    Contact Person: David I. Sommers, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6154, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-7861, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82e6f1edefefe7f0f1c2efe3ebeeacecebeaace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="771304181a1a120504371a161e1b59191e1f59101801">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 10, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-8892 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>