Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Notices 17815 

1Petitioners requested Compania Apicola 

Argentina S.A. and Mielar S.A.as separate entities. 

However, in a previous segment of this proceeding, 

the Department treated these two companies as a 

single entity. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dena Crossland or Angelica Mendoza, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3362 or (202) 482– 

3019, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department received a timely 

request from Jiangxi Ansun in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214(c), for 

a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

PRC. On October 28, 2008, the 

Department found that the request for 

review with respect to Jiangxi Ansun 

met all of the regulatory requirements 

set forth in 19 CFR 351.214(b) and 

initiated an antidumping duty new 

shipper review. See Glycine from China: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review, 73 FR 65584 

(November 4, 2008) (Initiation Notice). 

On February 23, 2009, Jiangxi Ansun 

withdrew its request for a new shipper 

review. 

Rescission of New Shipper Review 

Section 351.214(f)(1) of the 

Department’s regulations provides that 

the Department may rescind a new 

shipper review if the party that 

requested the review withdraws its 

request for review within 60 days of the 

date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. 

Although Jiangxi Ansun withdrew its 

request after the 60-day deadline, we 

find it reasonable to extend the deadline 

because we have not yet committed 

significant resources to the Jiangxi 

Ansun new shipper review, (e.g., we 

have not issued our preliminary results). 

Further, we have received a letter from 

the petitioner GEO Specialty Chemicals 

Inc., noting that it has no objection to 

Jiangxi Ausun’s withdrawal request for 

this new shipper review. See Letter from 

GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc, dated 

March 3, 2009. Based upon the above, 

we are rescinding the new shipper 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on glycine from PRC with respect to 

Jiangxi Ansun. 

Notifications 

We intend to instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 15 days 

from the date of publication of the 

notice to liquidate any entries by Jiangxi 

Ansun during the period of review at 

the cash deposit rate in effect at the time 

of entry. 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders 

(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destructions of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305(a). Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or convesion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subjet to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

determination and notice in accordance 

with section 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.214(f)(3). 

Dated: April 10, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–8861 Filed 4–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–357–812] 

Honey from Argentina: Notice of 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is partially rescinding 

its administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

Argentina for the period December 1, 

2007, to November 30, 2008, with 

respect to multiple companies. This 

rescission is based on the timely 

withdrawal of the request for review by 

the interested parties that requested the 

review. A complete list of the 

companies for which the administrative 

review is being rescinded is provided 

below. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Room 7866, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195 or 

(202) 482–3019, respectively. 

Background: 

On December 1, 2008, the Department 

published in the Federal Register its 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

Argentina. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 73 

FR 72764 (December 1, 2008). In 

response, on December 30, 2008, the 

Asociacion de Cooperativas Argentinas 

requested an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on honey 

from Argentina for the period December 

1, 2007, through November 30, 2008. On 

December 31, 2008, the American 

Honey Producers Association and Sioux 

Honey Association (collectively, 

petitioners) requested an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on honey from Argentina for the period 

December 1, 2007, through November 

30, 2008. Specifically, petitioners 

requested that the Department conduct 

an administrative review of entries of 

subject merchandise made by 17 

Argentine producers/exporters.1 Also on 

December 31, 2008, Nexco S.A. 

requested an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on honey 

from Argentina for the period December 

1, 2007, through November 30, 2008. 

The Asociacion de Cooperativas 

Argentinas and Nexco S.A. were 

included in the petitioners’ request for 

review. 

On February 2, 2009, the Department 

initiated a review of the 17 companies 

for which an administrative review was 

requested. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 74 FR 5821 

(February 2, 2009) (Initiation Notice). 

The Department received a request for 

administrative review from Patagonik 

S.A. (Patagonik) in response to the 

December 1, 2008, opportunity to 

request an administrative review. 

However, its request was dated January 

2, 2009, after the December 31, 2008, 

deadline. On January 23, 2009, the 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

17816 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Notices 

Department returned the letter 

requesting an administrative review to 

Patagonik, stating that the request was 

untimely and that the Department 

would not initiate a review based on 

this request. See Letter from the 

Department of Commerce to Patagonik 

S.A., dated January 23, 2009. On 

February 23, 2009, Patagonik submitted 

a letter requesting that the Department 

reconsider its decision not to initiate a 

review based on Patagonik’s request. 

Patagonik provided information to the 

Department indicating the reasons for 

the untimely filing of the request. After 

examining the information, the 

Department again declined to initiate an 

administrative review based on 

Patagonik’s request. See Letter from the 

Department of Commerce to Patagonik 

S.A., dated March 17, 2009. 

On March 6, 2009, petitioners timely 

withdrew their requests for review of 

the following companies: AGLH S.A., 

Algodonera Avellaneda S.A., Alimentos 

Naturales–Natural Foods, Alma Pura, 

Bomare S.A. (Bodegas Miguel 

Armengol), Compania Apicola 

Argentina S.A. and Mielar S.A., 

Compania Inversora Platense S.A., EL 

Mana S.A., HoneyMax S.A., 

Interrupcion S.A., Miel Ceta SRL, 

Patagonik S.A., Productos Afer S.A., 

Seabird Argentina S.A., and Seylinco 

S.A. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is honey from Argentina. The products 

covered are natural honey, artificial 

honey containing more than 50 percent 

natural honey by weight, preparations of 

natural honey containing more than 50 

percent natural honey by weight, and 

flavored honey. The subject 

merchandise includes all grades and 

colors of honey whether in liquid, 

creamed, comb, cut comb, or chunk 

form, and whether packaged for retail or 

in bulk form. 

The merchandise under the scope of 

the order is currently classifiable under 

subheadings 0409.00.00, 1702.90.90, 

and 2106.90.99 of the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) purposes, the 

Department’s written description of the 

merchandise under this order is 

dispositive. 

Rescission, in Part, of Administrative 

Review 

Section 351.213(d)(1) of the 

Department’s regulations provides that 

the Department will rescind an 

administrative review if the party that 

requested the review withdraws its 

request for review within 90 days of the 

date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review, or 

withdraws at a later date if the 

Department determines it is reasonable 

to extend the time limit for withdrawing 

the request. 

The petitioners timely withdrew their 

requests for an administrative review 

within the 90–day deadline for the 

following companies: AGLH S.A., 

Algodonera Avellaneda S.A., Alimentos 

Naturales–Natural Foods, Alma Pura, 

Bomare S.A. (Bodegas Miguel 

Armengol), Compania Apicola 

Argentina S.A. and Mielar S.A., 

Compania Inversora Platense S.A., EL 

Mana S.A., HoneyMax S.A., 

Interrupcion S.A., Miel Ceta SRL, 

Patagonik S.A., Productos Afer S.A., 

Seabird Argentina S.A., and Seylinco 

S.A. Because the petitioners were the 

only party to request administrative 

reviews of each of these companies, we 

are rescinding the review with regard to 

AGLH S.A., Algodonera Avellaneda 

S.A., Alimentos Naturales–Natural 

Foods, Alma Pura, Bomare S.A. 

(Bodegas Miguel Armengol), Compania 

Apicola Argentina S.A. and Mielar S.A., 

Compania Inversora Platense S.A., EL 

Mana S.A., HoneyMax S.A., 

Interrupcion S.A., Miel Ceta SRL, 

Patagonik S.A., Productos Afer S.A., 

Seabird Argentina S.A., and Seylinco 

S.A. 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) 15 days after the 

publication of this notice. The 

Department will direct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties for these companies 

at the cash deposit rate in effect on the 

date of entry for entries during the 

period December 1, 2007, to November 

30, 2008. 

Respondent Selection 

On February 10, 2009, the Department 

issued a respondent selection 

memorandum containing import data 

from proprietary CBP records for the 

period December 1, 2007, to November 

30, 2008. In the memorandum, the 

Department stated that it intended to 

limit the number of companies 

examined in this period of review. As 

petitioners have withdrawn their 

request for 15 of the 17 companies listed 

in the Initiation Notice, it is no longer 

necessary to limit the number of 

companies examined in this period of 

review. Consequently, we will 

individually examine the two remaining 

companies for which an administrative 

review has been requested: Asociacion 

de Cooperativas Argentinas and Nexco 

S.A. 

Notification to Parties 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

section 351.402(f) of the Department’s 

regulations to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this period of 

time. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and subsequent assessment of 

double antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with section 351.305(a)(3) of the 

Department’s regulations. Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 351.213(d)(4) of 

the Department’s regulations and 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. 

Dated: April 9, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–8864 Filed 4–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–552–801 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Amended Final Results of the Fourth 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alan Ray, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, N.W., 

Washington, DC, 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5403. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES