alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
BLUELINX CORPORATION HOURLY SAVINGS PLAN
 th
 W I T N E S S E T H :




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



(1)
    
    Expenses for (or necessary to obtain) medical care that would be
deductible under Code section 213(d) (determined without regard to whether the
expenses exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income);(2)
    
    Costs directly related to the purchase (excluding mortgage payments) of
a principal residence for the Participant;(3)
    
    The payment of tuition, related educational fees and room and board
expenses for up to the next twelve months of post-secondary education for the
Participant, the Participants spouse, children or dependents (as defined in
Code Section 152, and, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005,
without regard to Code Section 152(b)(1), (b)(2) or (d)(1)(B));(4)
    
    Payments necessary to prevent the eviction of the Participant from the
Participants principal residence or foreclosure on the mortgage of that
residence;(5)
    
    Payments for burial or funeral expenses for the Participants deceased
parent, Spouse, children or dependents (as defined in Code Section 152, and,
for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005, without regard to Code
section 152(d)(1)(B));
 3




---



##### 



(6)
    
    Expenses for the repair of damage to the Participants principal
residence that would qualify for the casualty deduction under Code Section 165
(determined without regard to whether the loss exceeds 10% of adjusted gross
income); or(7)
    
    Any other financial need which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
through the publication of revenue rulings, notices and other documents of
general applicability, may from time to time designate as a deemed immediate
and heavy financial need.
         4




---



##### 



provided however
    BLUELINX CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Barbara V. TinsleyName:
    Barbara V. TinsleyTitle:

General Counsel & Secretary 5
Exhibit 31.2

SARBANES-OXLEY
SECTION 302 (a) CERTIFICATION

|I, Marc
      Dell'Immagine, certify that:
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|1.                                        
|                                          
|2.                                        
|                                          
|3.                                        
|                                          
|4.                                        
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|5.                                        
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|                                          
|6.                                        

Date: November 22, 2004

| | /s/
      Marc Dell'Immagine                     
| | -------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  Marc
      Dell'Immagine                  
| | Controller and
      Principal Accounting Officer

---
Kristian BEAUCHAMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-55

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Optionable, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas F.
Burchill, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




April
      15, 2010
                /s/ Thomas
      F. BurchillPrincipal Financial
    Officer
Dusan BABIC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1017

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (751)
<INVENTORY>                                     36,494
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,860
<PP&E>                                          89,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                (39,329)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,914
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,557
<SALES>                                         92,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,691
<CGS>                                           60,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   217
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,572
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,304
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 121/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 121 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 501 June 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 121

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 501 June 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 121/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2007/C 121/02 | Ex-post publicity of Eurostat grants in 2006 | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 121/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2007/C 121/02

Ex-post publicity of Eurostat grants in 2006

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 121/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4705 — Blackstone/Klöckner Pentaplast) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 3 |
| 2007/C 121/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4704 — Bridgepoint/Gambro Healthcare) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |
| 2007/C 121/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4694 — RCI Banque/RFS) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2007/C 121/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4705 — Blackstone/Klöckner Pentaplast) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

3

2007/C 121/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4704 — Bridgepoint/Gambro Healthcare) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

2007/C 121/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4694 — RCI Banque/RFS) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2583 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2583

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain textile device covers and 
                                stands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain textile device covers and 
                                stands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TEXTILE DEVICE COVERS AND STANDS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Covers with an      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        exterior surface                                                   31/2015.......
                        of textile
                        materials
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6307.90.98) that
                        convert to a
                        stand and
                        incorporate a
                        frame to hold
                        portable
                        electronic
                        devices of a kind
                        classified in
                        headings 8470,
                        8471, 8543 and
                        8517.............

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) of Newsearch, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, Kenneth S. Adessky, the Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: September 12, 2007 /s/ Kenneth S. Adessky     Kenneth S. Adessky, Chief Financial Officer
Jamir Ahmed MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1550

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
AMENDMENT NO


AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO




ASSET PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT




DATED JUNE 14, 2007







THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 to Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement is made and entered into this 3rd day of March, 2008, by and among GLOBAL CASINOS, INC. a Utah corporation ("Global"); and DOC HOLLIDAY CASINO, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Doc Holliday”).




WITNESETH:




WHEREAS, the parties executed and delivered a certain Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of June 14, 2007, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated September 28, 2007 and by Amendment No. 2 thereto dated November 30, 2007 and by Amendment No. 3 thereto dated December 5, 2007 and by Amendment No. 4 thereto dated January 30, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and




WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify and amend certain provisions of the Agreement in the particulars herein below set forth.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained the parties agree as follows:




1.

Section 9.1(b) of the Agreement is further amended in its entirety to provide the following:




“9.1(b)   By either Buyer or Seller, if for any reason the parties have failed to close the transactions contemplated by this Agreement on or before March 31, 2008, provided that the party seeking to terminate is not in material default hereunder.”




2.

This Amendment may not be construed to amend the Agreement in any way except as expressly set forth herein.  The execution and delivery of this Amendment does not constitute and this Amendment may not be construed to constitute a waiver by any party of:




a.

Any breach of the Agreement by any party, whether or not such breach is now existing or currently known or unknown to the non-breaching party or parties; or




b.

Any right or remedy arising from or available to a party by reason of a breach of the  Agreement by any other party or parties.




3.

The parties hereby confirm that the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is in full force and effect.  In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall control.











4.

Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed the Agreement the date and year first above written.




GLOBAL CASINOS, INC.

a Utah corporation  










/s/ Clifford L. Neuman

Name:  Clifford L. Neuman

Title:  President




DOC HOLLIDAY CASINO, LLC.,

a Colorado limited liability corporation  







/s/ Fedele V. Scutti

Name: Fedele V. Scutti

Title:  Member















2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                         746,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,974,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 18,329,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,061,000
<PP&E>                                      17,606,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,210,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,577,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,399,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,525,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,577,000
<SALES>                                     14,623,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,623,000
<CGS>                                       12,626,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,557,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             590,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,524,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,524,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,524,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40876 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GABRIEL MANZO-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-21-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gabriel Manzo-Lopez appeals his conviction of illegal reentry following deportation. He argues that his previous deportation proceeding was fundamentally unfair due to the retroactive application of statutory changes to the immigration laws barring him from seeking a waiver of deportation. He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent but he wishes to preserve the issue for further review.No. 02-40876 -2- Manzo-Lopez’s deportation proceeding was not rendered fundamentally unfair because he was not able to argue for a waiver of deportation. See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz , 313 F.3d 225, 231 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 922 (2003). Manzo-Lopez argues for the first time on appeal that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) is unconstitutional because a priorfelony conviction is an element of the offense of illegal reentry, and not merely a sentence enhancement, and should have been charged in the indictment and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for further review. Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000) did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**785 KA 13-01142**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEVIN C. JOHNSON, ALSO KNOWN AS KEVIN JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered May 21, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of failure to register a change of internet accounts.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of failure to register a change of internet accounts (Correction Law § 168-f [4]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence ( see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: July 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 10.08


Exhibit 10.08
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Warren McIntyre, Chief Financial Officer of Evolving Gold
Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal
        year ended March 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                    

| | By:    | /s/ Warren
      McIntyre
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | Warren McIntyre            
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | November 1, 2006           

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
A.B., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1882 Consolidated: 3D17-1858

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.