alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
a50031883ex10_3.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 







Ashton, September 21, 2011












AGREEMENT ON FUTURE CONTINUATION OF UK EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT







Dear Allan,







Your UK employment agreement will be suspended for the term of this Singapore Employment Contract. Upon termination or expiration of the Singapore Agreement for reasons other than serious misconduct or termination by you or your total incapacity, the suspension of the English employment contract will cease and you will be re-employed by Chemviron Carbon Ltd with your then current annual basic salary.







As your UK salary has been converted to Singapore Dollars with the exchange rate per September 21, 2011 being (1GBP equals 1.98171 Singapore Dollars), this exchange rate will be used to reconvert your then current Singapore annual basic salary to UK pounds.







Upon re-engagement by us you will keep your seniority including any additional seniority build up under the Singapore contract. Upon re-engagement by us you will become eligible to re-join Chemviron Carbon Ltd's defined contribution pension scheme (or such higher or lower percentage if there has been any change in scheme), where Chemviron Carbon will pay 15% of your then current annual basic salary into the scheme when you contribute 5% of your annual basic salary. This payment compensates for the fixed bonus under your Singapore Contract which will not be part of any re-engagement.







All benefits linked to your relocation to Singapore including but not limited to housing, airflights will cease to apply upon your re-engagement by us.







Nothing contained herein will guarantee you continued employment. Chemviron Carbon Ltd may terminate your UK employment contract at any time in accordance with applicable law e.g. in case there is no suitable position available for you. In case of termination of your employment agreement you will benefit from the notice and severance in accordance with English law. Any payments received in Singapore related to termination of such employment agreement will be deducted from any amounts payable by us.







Please confirm your acceptance.







Best regards,







/s/  C.H.S (Kees) Majoor,


Executive Vice President Asia & Europe


Director Chemviron Carbon Ltd







Acceptance Confirmed







/s/  Allan Singelton


22 September 2011
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00734-CV

In re Jerel Smith

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Relator Jerel Smith, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has 

filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus directed to Margaret Moore, the District Attorney of 

Travis County, Texas. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.

This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over a district attorney. See In 

re Jones, No. 06-03-00061-CV, 2003 WL 1985247, at *1 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Apr. 30, 2003, 

orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Roberts v. Lowry, 742 S.W.2d 747, 

749 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, no writ). By statute, this Court has the authority to 

issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate 

county, or county court in the court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce 

our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221. Thus, the District Attorney of Travis 

County is not a party against whom we may issue a writ of mandamus unless necessary to 

enforce our jurisdiction. Relator has not demonstrated that our jurisdiction is implicated here. 

We have no jurisdiction to grant relator the relief he seeks.
2

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Filed: November 19, 2019
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11703 and #11704]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Texas dated 04/09/2009. *Incident:*
                         Live Oak County Wildfire. *Incident Period:*
                         04/02/2009. *Effective Date:*
                         04/09/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/08/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/09/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Live Oak. *Contiguous Counties:* Texas: Atascosa, Bee, Duval, Jim Wells, Karnes, McMullen, San Patricio. The Interest Rates are: PercentHomeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.375Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.187Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11703 5 and for economic injury is 11704 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Texas. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 9, 2009. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E9-8791 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (400)
<INVENTORY>                                    173,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,206
<PP&E>                                         477,411
<DEPRECIATION>                               (216,728)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 551,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,511
<BONDS>                                        205,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   551,212
<SALES>                                        187,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,709
<CGS>                                          147,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (353)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,965
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,438
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,438
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brent Douglas MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50177.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

U.S. Attorney, USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jerry D. Whatley, Santa Barbara, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Brent Douglas Morris appeals from the district court order denying the appointment of retained counsel under the Criminal Justice Act nunc pro tunc to the commencement of trial. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Morris has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No supplemental pro se brief has been filed.

The district court’s order denying retained counsel’s appointment as CJA counsel is neither a final appealable order, nor an appealable collateral order under *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). *See*28 U.S.C. § 1291; *Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay,*437 U.S. 463, 468, 98 S.Ct. 2454, 57 L.Ed.2d 351 (1978) (setting forth that the order must: (1) conclusively determine disputed question, (2) resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and (3) be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment in order to fall within collateral order exception).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Miguel Angel BAHENA; Maria Cruz Bahena, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-73486.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

*192J. Jack Artz, Esq., South Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC — District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Papú Sandhu, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Miguel Angel Bahena and his wife, Maria Cruz Bahena, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction over petitioners’ sole contention that the IJ erred by concluding that their removal would not cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their United States citizen daughter. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).

We deny petitioners’ request to remand their case to the IJ to be held in abeyance pending resolution of their son’s application for adjustment of status without prejudice to any motion to reopen regarding this issue that may be pending before the BIA.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document

EXHIBIT 10.22

AMENDMENT TO THE HARTFORD EXCESS PENSION PLAN II


The Hartford Excess Pension Plan II (“The Plan"), which was most recently restated effective January 1, 2012, is hereby amended effective January 1, 2021, to clarify certain interest rate assumptions for lump sums payments in the event of a Change in Control. 


This clarification is being made on account of final regulations published by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC"), effective January 1, 2021. These regulations revise the PBGC’s methodology for calculating lump sum interest rates upon plan termination and replace the PBGC’s monthly publication of interest rates used by private sector plans (often referred to by the PBGC as "Appendix C rates") with a table to be used by private sector plans to determine the applicable rates under Appendix C rates for each month.


The second sentence of Section 2.05 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:


The amount of such lump sum payment shall be equal to the sum of (i) the Participant’s Cash Balance Account, if any, plus (ii) the Present Value of the Participant’s Final Average Pay benefit, if any, where such present value is calculated on an actuarial basis determined by the Committee, using the interest rates for immediate annuities and deferred annuities specified by the PBGC for valuing lump sum benefits for private sector payments (often referred to as the “Appendix C to Part 4022 rates”) for the month in which the Change in Control Occurs.  




THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.


						
	By:	/s/ Lori Rodden
		Lori Rodden, Chief Human Resources Officer
		
	Date:	December 13, 2021






                    


210558038_1 LAW                    344
June 30, 2015

Mr. Brian Albright

Albright Managed Networks, LLC

112 W 8th St suite B

Port Angeles, WA 98362

Dear Mr. Albright:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 27, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0796), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P. (thePartnership) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, David M. Tierney, principal financial officer of Reef Global EnergyIV, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| Date:  April 15, 2009 | /s/  David M. Tierney                              |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                       | David  M. Tierney                                  |
|                       | Chief  Accounting Officer–Public Partnerships |
|                       | Reef  Exploration, L.P.                            |
|                       | (principal  financial and accounting officer)      |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of §18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided tothe Partnership and will be retained by the partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the annual report of China Housing & Land Development, Inc.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     i. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     ii. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff
upon request.

/s/ Lu Pingji
-------------
Lu Pingji
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
April 2, 2007


This Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is not "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by
applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.








<PAGE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Mechel PAO (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 13, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ OLEG V. KORZHOV    
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Oleg V. Korzhov        
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Health Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period endingSeptember 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul H. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
EXHIBIT 32.1

AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the
Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 31, 2015

/s/ E.L. Spencer, Jr.

E.L. Spencer, Jr.

President,
Chief Executive Officer

and Chairman of the Board