alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 10, 2023

NO. 03-22-00472-CV

Howard Bart Freidman, Appellant

v.

Deborah Jenkins, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on May 6, 2022. Howard Bart 

Friedman has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court 

agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses

the appeal. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the 

court below.
# Official Journal L 41/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 41 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6017 February 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 41

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6017 February 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 10 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic compatibility [2017/260] | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 10 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic compatibility [2017/260]

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6616

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MAXIMILLIAN ROBBINS FARROW,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00120-LMB-1)

Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 25, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maximillian Robbins Farrow, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Following his guilty plea, Maximillian Robbins Farrow was convicted of conspiracy 

to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin, in 

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. At Farrow’s September 2017 sentencing, the 

district court imposed a 48-month term of imprisonment. Farrow did not appeal the 

criminal judgment. Instead, in April 2019, Farrow filed a self-styled motion for 

clarification of the manner in which the court applied the Sentencing Guidelines in his case. 

The district court denied this motion on various grounds, and Farrow now appeals that 

order. 

Upon review, we discern no error in the district court’s rationale for denying 

Farrow’s motion for clarification. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United 

States v. Farrow, No. 1:17-cr-00120-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2020). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE of Louisiana v. Iren COOPER

NO. 2017-K-1351

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

Denied.
I, Henk Van Alphen, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Cardero Resource Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  January 29, 2007



/s/ Henk Van Alphen



Henk Van Alphen
President and Chief Executive Officer
Motion GRANTED and Order filed July 3, 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00524

- CV

____________ IN RE MICHAEL REILLY AND RAVAGO AMERICAS D/B/A GENESIS POLYMERS , Relator s

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 47163



### ORDER

On July 2, 2019, relator s Michael Reilly and Ravago Americas d/b/a Genesis Polymers, filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to order the Honorable Larry Weiman, Judge of the 80th District Court, in Harris County, Texas,

to vacate his June 13, 2019 “Order Denying D efendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuantto the Texas Citizens Participation Act” and his June 25, 2019 “Trial Preparation
Order.”

Relator s have also filed a motion for temporary relief, asking this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of
mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10.
It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator s’ request for relief requires further consideration and that relator s will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator s’ request for temporary relief and issue the following order:

We ORDER all proceedings in the trial court , including the June 13, 2019 “Order Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss P ursuant to the Texas Citizens Participation Act” (to the extent it requires the parties to take action regarding an award of attorney’s fees) and the June 25, 2019 “Trial Preparation Order”
, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator s’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.
In addition, the court requests Premier Polymers, LLC , the real party

- in

interest, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before July 1 7 , 2019

. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60728 Summary Calendar

ROBERTA CRISTINA BARBOSA-SOUZA; JEAN GABRIEL SOUZA,
Petitioners

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A096 076 680 BIA No. A096 076 681

Before KING, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roberta Cristina Barbosa-Souza and her son, Jean Gabriel Souza, both natives and citizens of Brazil, petition this court for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their motion to reconsider the dismissal of their appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of their motion to reopen their removal proceedings. They argue that (1) there was no in absentia determination because the IJ deemed their applications for relief to be U n i te d S tate s C o u rt o f Ap p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June30 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd eterm inedthat thisop inion should not * be publish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d circum st ance s set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-60728 Document: 00511526048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2011No. 10-60728

abandoned, (2) they rebutted the presumption of effective notice afforded to the mailing of the notices of hearing by regular mail, (3) the lack of effective notice of their removal hearing and their inability to present their applications for relief from removal violated their rights to due process, and (4) the BIA engaged in impermissible fact-finding. Because they did not exhaust their first and last arguments by raising them before the BIA, we lack jurisdiction to consider them. See Roy v. Ashcroft , 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 200 4). The record and the relevant legal authorities do not support the Souz as’ assertion that they rebutted the presumption of effective notice. Though the IJ erroneously listed the address of the Souzas as being in Newark, NY, the actual address on the Notice to Appear is in Newark, NJ, and the IJ stated that the notice of hearing was mailed to the address on the Notice to Appear. The BIA likewise noted that the notices had been mailed to the addresses shown on the NTAs. Because all of the relevant documents in the record except for the IJ’s

erroneous reference show the Souzas’ address as being in New Jersey, they have failed to rebut the presumption that they received effective notice. The Souzas have thus failed to show that their rights to due process were violated and have failed to make the requisite showing regarding the BIA’s decision. See Singh v. Gonzales , 436 F.3d 484, 487-88 (5th Cir. 2 006). The petition for review is DENIED.

2 Case: 10-60728 Document: 00511526048 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2011
# C_2022251EN.01000101.xml

| 30.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2021-2022 SESSION

Sittings of 13 to 16 December 2021

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136257 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136257 

 COA: 283302 

Ingham CC: 06-000956-FC

LAMAR ANTONIO HICKS,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Steven Santo, Chief Executive Officer,

pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14, as adopted

pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Steven Santo, Chief Executive Officer of Avantair, Inc., certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Avantair, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: September 27, 2007



|                 |  |                        
|---------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Steven Santo
|Name:            |  | Steven Santo           
|Title:           |  | Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50887 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE DELGADO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-340-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Delgado has moved for leave to withdrawand hasfiled a briefin accordance with Andersv. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Delgado has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 05-40781

2 excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
**Exhibit 23.2**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

The Board ofDirectors 

LHC Group, Inc. 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-130600 and 333-125713) on Form S-8 of LHC Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of LHC Group, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009, annual report on Form 10-K of LHC Group, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 

March 15,2010
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, M. H. McIlvain, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify
that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American
Resource Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and we have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known
     to us by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in
     which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date: May 25, 2007

By:/s/ M. H. McIlvain
---------------------
M. H. McIlvain
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.22



SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS


In accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted filing Change in Control Employment Agreements by and between Glatfelter Corporation and the following employees as exhibits to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 because they are substantially identical to the Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between Glatfelter Corporation and certain employees, which are filed as indicated below:


Exhibit 10(j) to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.


David C. Elder


Dante C. Parrini


Exhibit 10(q) to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.


Christopher W. Astley


Eileen L. Beck


Samuel L. Hillard


Wolfgang Laures


Ramesh Shettigar


Jill L. Urey
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert F. Bick, Chief Executive Officer of Evolving Gold
Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F, of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.                                                                               

| | By:    | /s/ Robert Bick        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | Robert F. Bick         
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| |        |                        
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | July 28, 2008          

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---