alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amended and Restated Certificate of Trust


 Exhibit 4.7 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 SUNTRUST CAPITAL IX 
 THIS Amended and Restated Certificate of Trust of SunTrust
Capital IX (the “Trust”), dated as of August 29, 2006, is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the undersigned, as trustees, to amend and restate the original Certificate of Trust of the Trust which was filed on
August 18, 2004 (the “Original Certificate of Trust”), with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”). 
 The Original Certificate of Trust is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is SunTrust Capital IX. 
 2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are U.S. Bank Trust National Association, 300
Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trust Services Division. 
 3. Effective Date. This Amended and
Restated Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing. 
 4. Counterparts. This Amended and Restated Certificate of Trust may be
executed in one or more counterparts. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Amended and Restated Certificate of
Trust as of the date first above written. 
  

	
	 /s/ Raymond D. Fortin

	 Raymond D. Fortin

	 Administrative Trustee

	
	 /s/ Jerome T. Lienhard, II

	 Jerome T. Lienhard, II

	 Administrative Trustee

	
	 /s/ Kenneth R. Houghton

	 Kenneth R. Houghton

	 Administrative Trustee










			
	 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

	 as Property Trustee

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Earl W. Dennison, Jr.

	 Name:
	 	Earl W. Dennison Jr.
	 Title:
	 	Vice President
	
	 U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
 as Delaware Trustee

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Earl W. Dennison, Jr.

	 Name:
	 	Earl W. Dennison Jr.
	 Title:
	 	Vice President
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,066-01

EX P ARTE ROGELIO DELACERDA, Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1229727 IN THE 174T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convic t ed o f murder and sentenc ed to thirty five year s’ imprisonment. The First C o urt of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Delace rda v. State , 01-09-00972- CR (Tex. App.–Houston [ 1st Dist.] , J uly 21, 2011). Applicant contends th a

t h is a p p e ll a te c o u n s e l r ender ed ineffe ctive assistance beca use counsel failed to timely

notify Applicant that his conviction had bee n aff irmed and f

ailed to timely

inform Applicant of his right to file a pro sepetition for discre tionary revie w.2

Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. The trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusio n s of law that Applicant was improperly denied the opportunity to seek discretionar

y revie w. The trial court rec ommends that relief be grante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the First Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 01-09-000972- C R that aff

irmed his conviction in Cause No. 1229727 from the 174 District Court of Har ris t h County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: April 16, 2014 Do not publish
# C_2022207EN.01000401.xml

| 23.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-687/20) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 2002/49/EC - Assessment and management of environmental noise - Agglomerations, major roads and major railways - Article 7(2) - Strategic noise maps - Article 8(2) - Action plans - Article 10(2) - Annex VI - Information provided by the strategic noise maps - Summaries of action plans - Failure to communicate to the European Commission within the periods prescribed)

(2022/C 207/05)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Noll-Ehlers and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Portugal (represented by: M. Pimenta, P. Barros da Costa, H. Almeida, J. Reis Silva and L. Inez Fernandes, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that the Portuguese Republic, first, in failing to draw up strategic noise maps for the major roads PT_a_rd00410, PT_a_rd00458, PT_a_rd00460, PT_a_rd00462 and PT_a_rd00633 or action plans for the agglomerations of Amador and Porto and for the major roads and major railways referred to in the annex to the present judgment, and, second, in failing to communicate to the European Commission the information provided by those maps or the summaries of those action plans, has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 7(2), Article 8(2) and Article 10(2) of Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, read in conjunction with Annex VI to that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the Portuguese Republic, first, in failing to draw up strategic noise maps for the major roads PT_a_rd00410, PT_a_rd00458, PT_a_rd00460, PT_a_rd00462 and PT_a_rd00633 or action plans for the agglomerations of Amador and Porto and for the major roads and major railways referred to in the annex to the present judgment, and, second, in failing to communicate to the European Commission the information provided by those maps or the summaries of those action plans, has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 7(2), Article 8(2) and Article 10(2) of Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, read in conjunction with Annex VI to that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.

---
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Report of Independent Auditors**

 

To the Board of Directors

of AmeriCredit Corp.

 

Re:                 Sale and ServicingAgreement related to AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2004-AF,AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2004-BM, AmeriCredit AutomobileReceivables Trust 2004-1, AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2004-CA, andAmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2004-DF (the “Trusts”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2004

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion about AmeriCredit Corp. and its subsidiaries’ (the“Company”) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in theMortgage Bankers Association of America’s *Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers*, to the extent such procedures areapplicable, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in theaccompanying management assertion (Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with thoseminimum servicing standards.  Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about theCompany’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was madein accordance with attestation standards established by the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary inthe circumstances.  We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination of the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company has complied with the aforementionedminimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 isfairly stated, in all material respects.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

January 26, 2005

 

----

 

Exhibit I

 

AmeriCredit Financial Services,Inc.

801 Cherry Street, Suite 3900

Fort Worth, Texas  76102

 

**Management’s Assertion Concerning Compliance**

**with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards**

 

January 26, 2005

 

As of and for the period endedDecember 31, 2004, AmeriCredit Corp. and its subsidiaries have complied in allmaterial respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in theMortgage Bankers Association of America’s *UniformSingle Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (“USAP”), to theextent such procedures are applicable.

 

 
|  /s/ Clifton H. Morris, Jr.      |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Clifton H. Morris, Jr.                |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 
|  /s/ Daniel E. Berce |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Daniel E. Berce           |
| President                 |

 
|  /s/ Chris A. Choate              |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Chris A. Choate                        |
| Executive  Vice President,             |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
Dana Alan PEACOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3864

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
The LAW OFFICE OF JOHN D. SILEO, LLC v. Deborah KRUSE, Mark Kruse, and the Law Offices of Allan Berger & Associates, PLC

NO. 2018-C-0469

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

Denied.
Thomas BILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-67

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
SCPR-20-0000069 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
IN RE KAORU KASHIWAGI, Petitioner. (Foreign Law Consultant)

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER GRANTING PETITION (By Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson JJ.)

Upon review of the February 12, 2020 petition submitted to this court, made on behalf of Kaoru Kashiwagi, licensed in this jurisdiction as a Foreign Law Consultant pursuant to Rule 14 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai# i, requesting permission to resign his Foreign Law Consultant license, the declaration concerning his desire to resign, the affidavits from the Hawai # i State Bar Association, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, averring to his good standing with those organizations, and this court’s inherent power to oversee the licensing of the practice of law in this jurisdiction, see Akinaka v. Disciplinary Board of Hawai # i Supreme Court, 91 Hawai # i 51, 57, 979 P.2d 1077, 1083 (1999), Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-20-0000069 27-FEB-2020 11:39 AMIT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of this court shall remove Mr. Kashiwagi’s name from the role of active Foreign Law Consultants in this jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 27, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
# C_2004094EN.01003503.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/35

---

Removal from the register of Case C-374/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/91)

By order of 19 January 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-374/02: Commission of the European v Italian Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 44 of 22.02.2003.

1

---
---

CERTIFICATION

I, Blaine Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Cardero
Resource Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal
control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

---

(b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 30, 2012

*(signed) Blaine
Bailey*     Chief Financial Officer

-2-

---
Randall DYESS and Susan Dyess, Appellants, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., as Trustee FOR DEUTSCHE ALT-A SECURITIES, INC. Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-AR6, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1814

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf

Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New

York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rio de Janeiro Rome San Francisco São Paulo Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar

Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jakarta Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 082908/000003 - 5674853 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

May 23, 2014

By Electronic Mail

Mr. Robert J. Finamore

Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of China Southern Airlines Company Limited for an Exemption

and an Amended Foreign Air Carrier Permit (Docket DOT-OST-1996-2008)

Dear Mr. Finamore:

We have polled the U.S. air carrier representatives served with the above-referenced

application filed on May 21, 2014, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought therein.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Echmalian

Transportation Specialist

jonathan.echmalian@hoganlovells.com

D +1.202.637.5439

cc: George U. Carneal

Lu Wei Xi

robert.wirick@aa.com; howard.kass@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com;

chris.walker@delta.com; gbleopard@fedex.com; sllunsford@fedex.com;

jhill@cooley.com; perkmann@cooley.com; matwood@cozen.com;

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com; agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com;

dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com; anita.mosner@hklaw.com;

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com
STATE EX REL. Tony J. TABOR v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-0161

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TEREBONNE**

PER CURIAM:

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.

Relator has now exhausted the right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator has filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court, and the district court's ruling denying relief is now final. Hereafter, unless relator can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted the right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

WEIMER, J., recused.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 20, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00452

- CR

Jose Guadalupe AGUIRRE,

Appe llant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR7206

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s unopposed motion to file amended opening brief is granted. The appellee ’ s

brief is due January 16, 2017.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2569 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics’ work gloves. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics’ work 

gloves. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MECHANICS’ WORK GLOVES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking heading 9902.14.02; and 

8 (2) by inserting in numerical sequence the fol9 lowing new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2569 IS

‘‘ 9902.14.02 Mechanics’ work gloves, 

valued over $3.16 per pair 

but not over $3.65 per pair 

(provided for in subheading 6216.00.58) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) AMENDMENT TO U.S. NOTE.—Subchapter II of 

2 chapter 99 is amended by striking the first U.S. Note 18 

3 to such subchapter and inserting after U.S. Note 19 the 

4 following new U.S. Note: 

5 ‘‘20. For purposes of heading 9902.14.02, the term 

6 ‘mechanics’ work gloves’ means gloves having the fol7 lowing characteristics: imitation leather palms and fingers 

8 with fourchettes; backs comprising either one layer of syn9 thetic knitted fabric or three layers with the outer layer 

10 of synthetic knitted fabric, the center layer of foam and 

11 the inner layer of tricot fabric.’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

14 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS