alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

d0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140765 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140765 

 COA: 289828 

Wayne CC: 08-010427-FH 

ARTICIA MONIQUE CLARK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Page 1 of 3 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FINE LINE COMMERCIAL, LLC §
§ Plaintiff & § Court of Appeals No.: 03-15-00558-CV Counter-Defendant, §
§ Trial Court Case No.: C-1-CV-15-006001

v. §
§ ATX PAINTING COMPANY, INC. §
§ Defendant & § Counter-Plaintiff. §

ATX PAINTING COMPANY, INC.’S

MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

COMES NOW APPELLANT ATX PAINTING COMPANY, INC. and hereby

requests that the Court of Appeals FOR THE Third District of Texas dismiss the

above-entitled and numbered appeal, without prejudice, pursuant to Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 42.

Dated: Thursday, September 10, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,



### /s/ Ronald A. Ortman

_______________________________ Ronald A. Ortman

Texas State Bar No.: 15324407

O RTMAN L AW F IRM
700 N. Saint Mary’s St., Ste. 1400
San Antonio, Texas 78205-3535 T. (210) 591-1770

Email: raortman@raortman.com ACCEPTED 03-15-00558-CV
6864042 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/10/2015 11:42:49 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKPage 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), I certify that I

have conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties

which are listed below about the merits of this motion with the following results:

David M. Walters

, attorney of record for FINE LINE COMMERCIAL, LLC:

☐ opposes motion;
☐ does not oppose motion;
☐ agrees with motion;
☐ would not say whether motion is opposed;

☒ did not return my message regarding the

motion.



### /s/ Ronald A. Ortman

_____________________________ Ronald A. Ortman

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

DATE: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2015

.Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing ATX PAINTING COMPANY, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE has been served

upon all counsel/parties, as listed below, by placing a copy of same in the United

States mail, certified, return receipt requested, facsimile, electronically by ProDoc e-File, and/or by hand delivery on Thursday, September 10, 2015

.

WALTERS HULL, PLLC via eService

1101 Navasota Street Suite 1 Austin, TX 78702
Tel. (512) 236-1114

Fax (512) 236-1292

Brian E. Walters

Texas Bar No. 24056489 brian@waltershull.com
Mark A. Hull

Texas Bar No. 24042542 mark@waltershull.com
David M. Walters

Texas Bar No. 24056490 david@waltershull.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE



### /s/ Ronald A. Ortman

_____________________________ Ronald A. Ortman

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
ex10_26.htm


    Exhibit
10.26


       

       

      AccountAbilities,
Inc.

      500 Craig
Road, Suite 201

      Manalapan,
New Jersey  07726

       

      Michael
Xirinachs

      North
Atlantic Resources LTD.

      425 Broad
Hollow Road

      Melville,
New York 11747

       

      January 22, 2008

       

      Re:           Exchange
of Note for Stock and Warrants

       

      Dear Mr.
Xirinachs:

       

      The
following confirms our understanding with respect to the exchange by North
Atlantic Resources LTD (“North Atlantic”) of the Convertible Note dated August
6, 2007 issued to North Atlantic by Accountabilities, Inc. (the “Company”) in
the principal amount of $250,000 for shares of Common Stock and warrants to
purchase Common Stock of Accountabilities, Inc.

       

      
        	
                1.  

              	
                Upon
      the execution and delivery of this letter agreement, you will deliver the
      Note to the Company for cancellation.  In exchange therefore,
      you will receive (a) 744,031 shares of Common Stock, which has been
      calculated by dividing the total principal and interest outstanding under
      the Note as of the date hereof ($260,410.96) by $0.35  and (b) a
      warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a
      price of $.50 per share in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto (the
      “Warrant”).

              


      

       

      
        	
                2.  

              	
                The
      registration rights granted to you under that certain Convertible Note
      Purchase Agreement dated as of July 16, 2007 between North Atlantic and
      the Company will apply to the shares of Common Stock issued to you
      pursuant to this letter agreement and the shares underlying the
      Warrant.

              


      

       

      If you
agree with the terms set forth above, please countersign this letter in the
space provided below and return a signed copy to the Company with a copy of the
Note.

       

      Very truly yours,

       

      Accountabilities, Inc.

       

      By:    /s/  Stephen
DelVecchia

      Name:  Stephen
DelVecchia

      Title:   Chief
Financial Officer

       

      North
Atlantic Resources LTD

       

      By:    /s/ Michael
Xirinachs

      Name:    Michael
Xirinachs

      Title:   Investment
Advisor
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Thomas R. VenablesThomas R. Venables
Chief Executive Officer
 74
EXHIBIT
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF
      2002





I,
      Steven
      B. Solomon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      CT
      Holdings Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of CT Holdings Enterprises, Inc.





By:
                  /s/STEVEN B. SOLOMONSteven
                  B. SolomonChief
                  Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial OfficerAugust
                  10, 2007






17
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

          - [Docket ID: USAF-2009-0027]

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice To Delete a System of Records.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Air Force proposes to delete a system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

This proposed action will be effective without further notice on May 18, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Air Force Privacy Act Officer, Office of Warfighting Integration and Chief Information Officer, SAF/XCPPI, 1800 Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220, Washington, DC 20330-1800.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Ben Swilley at (703) 696-6648.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Air Force systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The Department of the Air Force proposes to delete a system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

Dated: April 14, 2009.

Morgan E. Frazier,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

### Deletion of System Notice:

## F036 AFPC A

### System Name:

Deceased Service Member's Dependent File (June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793).

### Reason:

                        This is a duplicate system that is now merged with F036 AF PC R, Casualty Files (June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793).                               ( print page 17840)                            There should be only one system for Casualty Files records.                    

[FR Doc. E9-8842 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
<PAGE>1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of American Insured Mortgage Investors - Series
85, L.P. (the "Issuer").

I, Barry S. Blattman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify
that to the best of my knowledge:

(i)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)          the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly represents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Issuer.


                                        AMERICAN INSURED MORTGAGE
                                        INVESTORS - SERIES 85, L.P.
                                        (Registrant)

                                        By:      CRIIMI, Inc.
                                                 General Partner



May 7, 2004                             /s/Barry S. Blattman
-----------                             ----------------------------------
Date                                    Barry S. Blattman
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the General Partner and will be retained by the General Partner and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7137

THOMAS J. BARKER,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-hc-02112-D)

Submitted: February 13, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas J. Barker, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, Raleigh, North Carolina, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, Christina Ann Thompson, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Thomas J. Barker, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Barker v. Stansberry , No. 5:07-hc02112-D (E.D.N.C. June 16, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2737 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2737

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on cast stainless 
               steel single-piece exhaust gas manifolds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on cast stainless 
               steel single-piece exhaust gas manifolds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAST STAINLESS STEEL SINGLE-PIECE EXHAUST GAS MANIFOLDS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.94 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to cast stainless steel single-
piece exhaust gas manifolds) is amended--
            (1) in the article description, by striking ``subheading 
        9902.01.50'' and inserting ``subheading 8409.91.50''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Sameer OKASHAH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 25, 2018

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*905In this direct criminal appeal, Appellant, Sameer Okashah, seeks review of his conviction for failure to remit state sales taxes and raises two issues. We affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence as to the first issue without discussion. However, we dismiss the appeal as to the second issue, in which Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by imposing restitution after he had filed the notice of appeal of the judgment and sentence, because we lack jurisdiction given his failure to file a notice of appeal challenging the restitution order. *See**Turner v. State* , 40 So.3d 925, 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding that the Court was constrained to dismiss the portion of the appeal challenging the imposition of restitution after the appellant had filed a notice of appeal of his judgment and sentence because he failed to file a separate notice of appeal of the restitution order); *see also**Pennywell v. Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Woodard* , 62 So.3d 19, 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (explaining that in order for an appellate court to have jurisdiction over an appeal, "[a] notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after rendition of the order to be reviewed" (citing Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) ).

AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and Jay, JJ., concur.
# ;MintoDevelopment Corporation PO &:t 1(}4(}8 2111 11NtAvemw, S111r¥1111 !i01.4S2.82SI:rt.1/JIJJ Pairbmtks, AK 9910UJ4(18 J<airbanks, AK 99701 fox: fl(J7.45U561
June 20, 2012 

### Kevin Adams United States Department ofTransportation c/o Matt Atkinson Warbelow's Air Ventures 3758 University .Avenue South Fairbanks. AK 99709 RE: Enhanced Mail and Passenger Air

### Taxi Service. to Minto, 

### .Alaska Dear Mr. Adams,**~·)2** '•

This letter is in support ofefforts to expand and enhance the Essential Air Service provided by Warbelow's Air Ventures to the community ofl'vlinto, Alaska. Continuation ofthe regular scheduled service providedthe last two years to the community ofMinto is imperative to our operations. Warbelow's provides reliable, sate and efficient service to ourcommunity. We support the planned continuance ofthe scheduled service with twin engine aircraft instead ofsingle engine. We feel that a twin engine plane will provide safer aircraH and 

### greater load capacity, 

### both ofYvhich 

### are important considerations torthe MDC shop. Current plane size is limited and we would be interested in shipping products ti·om our wood shop located at 309 School Street in Minto. Thank you for the opportunity to voice our·support for mail and passenger air taxi.servicc ID Minto. 

### Alaska. Sincerely, 

### 12: 

## 0l
### SERVE D MARC H 3 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH EMATTE RO F RUSHMOR EHELICOPTERS , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-002 3

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . EIR2009-GL-27-0021 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Adniinistrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Ronni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w J

, Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 * ON ECOP Y J . Dare n Byers , Respondent' s Counse l La w Office s o f

J . Darre n Byer s 10 5 Wes t FourthStree t Suit e 400 , O'Hanlo n Buildin g Winston-Salem , N C 2710 1 TEL : 336-727-107 0 FAX : 336-727-108 5 Chri s G . Zurales , Complainant' s Counse l Great Lake s Region , AGL- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e De s Plaines , I L60018-469 6 TEL : 847-294-771 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , DC 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2712 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bayowet C4. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bayowet 

C4. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYOWET C4. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.64 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-nonafluorobutanesulfonic acid, potassium 

7 salt) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 

8 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2712 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2724 

To suspend temporarily the duty on (RS)–1–(β-allyloxy-2,4- 

dichlorophenethyl)imidazole. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on (RS)–1–(β-allyloxy-2,4- 

dichlorophenethyl)imidazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. (RS)–1–(β-ALLYLOXY-2,4-DICHLOROPHENETHYL) 

4 IMIDAZOLE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 (RS)–1–(β-allyloxy-2,4- 

dichlorophenethyl)imidazole 

(CAS No. 35554–44–0) (provided for in subheading 

2933.29.35) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2724 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Sharif S. MIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.