# Official Journal C 242/21 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 242 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6421 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 242

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6421 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2021/C 242/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2021/C 242/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2021/C 242/02 | Case C-5/21 P: Appeal brought on 6 January 2021 by Deutsche Post AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 November 2020 in Case T-25/20, Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Pošta Slovenije (Representation of a stylised horn) | 2 |
| 2021/C 242/03 | Case C-26/21 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Dermavita Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-643/19, Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA) | 2 |
| 2021/C 242/04 | Case C-80/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 8 February 2021 — E.K., S.K. v D.B.P. | 3 |
| 2021/C 242/05 | Case C-81/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 February 2021 — B.S., W.S. v M. | 3 |
| 2021/C 242/06 | Case C-82/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 February 2021 — B.S., Ł.S. v M. | 4 |
| 2021/C 242/07 | Case C-152/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 9 March 2021 — SIA ‘Ogres HES’ v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija, Ekonomikas ministrija, Finanšu ministrija | 4 |
| 2021/C 242/08 | Case C-162/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 11 March 2021 — Pesticide Action Network Europe ASBL, Nature et Progrès Belgique ASBL, TN v État belge, represented by the Ministre des Classes moyennes, des Indépendants, des P.M.E., de l’Agriculture et de l’Intégration sociale, chargé des Grandes villes | 6 |
| 2021/C 242/09 | Case C-175/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 17 March 2021 — Harman International Industries v AB SA | 7 |
| 2021/C 242/10 | Case C-179/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 23 March 2021 — absoluts-bikes and more- GmbH & Co. KG v the-trading-company GmbH | 8 |
| 2021/C 242/11 | Case C-197/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 29 March 2021 — Soda-Club (CO2) SA, SodaStream International BV v MySoda Oy | 8 |
| 2021/C 242/12 | Case C-199/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 30 March 2021 — DN v Finanzamt Österreich | 9 |
| 2021/C 242/13 | Case C-217/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 April 2021 — AGRO — EKO 2013 EOOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’ | 10 |
| 2021/C 242/14 | Case C-221/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 (Czech Republic) lodged on 26 March 2021 — Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. and Others | 11 |
| 2021/C 242/15 | Case C-222/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 (Czech Republic) lodged on 22 March 2021 — České dráhy, a.s. | 12 |
| 2021/C 242/16 | Case C-227/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 9 April 2021 — ‘HA.EN.’ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija | 12 |
| 2021/C 242/17 | Case C-231/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 12 April 2021 — IA | 13 |
| 2021/C 242/18 | Case C-238/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 13 April 2021 — Porr Bau GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Graz-Umgebung | 14 |
| 2021/C 242/19 | Case C-241/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 14 April 2021 — I.L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet | 14 |
| | General Court |
| 2021/C 242/20 | Case T-842/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Repower v EUIPO — repowermap.org (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark REPOWER — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)) | 16 |
| 2021/C 242/21 | Case T-872/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — repowermap.org v EUIPO — Repower (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark REPOWER — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Freedom of expression) | 16 |
| 2021/C 242/22 | Case T-29/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — RQ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Director-General of OLAF — Decision waiving the applicant’s immunity from legal proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Duty of assistance and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials — Legitimate expectations — Presumption of innocence — Principle of sound administration) | 17 |
| 2021/C 242/23 | Case T-584/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 –Primart v EUIPO — Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz — Earlier national word marks PRIMA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Referral) | 18 |
| 2021/C 242/24 | Case T-69/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Verband Deutscher Alten und Behindertenhilfe and CarePool Hannover v Commission (State aid — Independent social action — Subsidies granted to associations in a regional working group for charity action — Rejection of a complaint — Decision not to raise any objections at the end of the preliminary examination stage — Action for annulment — Status of interested party — Safeguarding of procedural rights — Substantial effect on competitive position — Admissibility — No serious difficulties — No substantial alteration to existing aid) | 18 |
| 2021/C 242/25 | Case T-561/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission (State aid — Postal sector — Compensation for the discharge of the universal service obligation — Decision not to raise any objections — Calculation of the compensation — Net avoided cost methodology — Taking into account the intangible benefits of the universal service — Use of funds granted as compensation — State guarantee of redundancy payments in the event of bankruptcy — VAT exemption for certain transactions carried out by the universal service provider — Accounting allocation of common costs between universal service activities and non-universal service activities — Capital contribution from a public undertaking in order to avoid the bankruptcy of its subsidiary — Complaint from a competitor — Decision finding no State aid after the preliminary examination stage — Existing aid — Advantages granted on a periodic basis — Whether imputable to the State — Private investor test) | 19 |
| 2021/C 242/26 | Case T-611/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma v EMA (Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for a generic version of the medicinal product Tecfidera — Decision of the EMA not to validate the application for marketing authorisation — Previous decision of the Commission taking the view that Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate was not covered by the same global marketing authorisation as Fumaderm — Plea of illegality — Admissibility — Previously authorised combination medicinal product — Subsequent marketing authorisation for a component of the combination medicinal product — Assessment of the existence of two different global marketing authorisations — Manifest error of assessment) | 20 |
| 2021/C 242/27 | Case T-45/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Acron and Others v Commission (Dumping — Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia — Request for partial interim review — Termination of the partial interim review — No change of circumstances — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence) | 21 |
| 2021/C 242/28 | Case T-252/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Pech v Council (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Protection of legal advice — First subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Protection of the decision-making process — Refusal to grant full access to a legal opinion of the Council’s Legal Service) | 22 |
| 2021/C 242/29 | Case T-260/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Al Tarazi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Rights of defence — Right to property — Right to exercise an economic activity — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality) | 22 |
| 2021/C 242/30 | Case T-285/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreement — The MARSOL Project — Eligible costs — OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible — Repayment of sums paid — Burden of proof — Principle of good faith — Right to be heard — Principle of sound administration — Rights of the defence — Proportionality) | 23 |
| 2021/C 242/31 | Case T-300/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Achema and Lifosa v Commission (State aid — Market in electricity generated from renewable energy sources — Operating aid — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Infringement of procedural rights — 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection — 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 — Article 30 TFEU — Article 110 TFEU — Body of consistent evidence) | 24 |
| 2021/C 242/32 | Case T-322/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — El-Qaddafi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment) | 24 |
| 2021/C 242/33 | Case T-509/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark FLÜGEL — Earlier national word marks ... VERLEIHT FLÜGEL and RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL — Relative grounds for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 70(2) and Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 26 |
| 2021/C 242/34 | Case T-525/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Intering and Others v Commission (Public contracts — Tendering procedure — Reduction of dust and nitrogen oxide emissions at the Kosovo B thermal power plant, Units B1 and B2 — Rejection of the application — Application for annulment submitted in the reply — New claims — Manifest inadmissibility — Amendment of the selection criteria during the procedure — Equal treatment) | 26 |
| 2021/C 242/35 | Case T-540/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Sharif v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to exercise an economic activity) | 27 |
| 2021/C 242/36 | Case T-543/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Romania v Commission (Cohesion Fund and ERDF — Article 139(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 — Temporal application of an increased co-financing rate adopted after submission of the final application for interim payment but before acceptance of the accounts — Legitimate expectation — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of good administration) | 28 |
| 2021/C 242/37 | Case T-555/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI — Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Detriment to reputation — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 28 |
| 2021/C 242/38 | Case T-579/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann v EUIPO (Gymnastic or sports equipment) (Community design — Multiple application for community designs representing gymnastic or sports equipment — Right of priority — Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty — Article 4 of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property — Priority period) | 29 |
| 2021/C 242/39 | Case T-615/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Point Tec Products Electronic v EUIPO — Compagnie des montres Longines, Francillon (representation of two extended wings around a triangle) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing two extended wings around a triangle — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 72(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 30 |
| 2021/C 242/40 | Case T-644/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Linde Material Handling v EUIPO — Verti Aseguradora (VertiLight) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark VertiLight — Earlier national word mark VERTI — Relative ground for refusal — No damage to reputation — No link between the marks at issue — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 30 |
| 2021/C 242/41 | Case T-663/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Hasbro v EUIPO — Kreativni Događaji (MONOPOLY) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MONOPOLY — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 31 |
| 2021/C 242/42 | Case T-695/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Falqui v Parliament (Institutional law — Single statute for Members of the European Parliament — Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies — Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions — Change in the amount of pensions for Italian national members of parliament — Corresponding change by the European Parliament in the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy — Acquired rights — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality) | 32 |
| 2021/C 242/43 | Case T-843/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Correia v EESC (Civil service — EESC staff — Members of the temporary staff — Refusal to regrade — Action for annulment — Time limit for complaints — Burden of proving expiry of the time limit — Act adversely affecting an official — Admissibility — Equal treatment — Legal certainty — Action for damages — Non-material damage) | 32 |
| 2021/C 242/44 | Case T-31/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — West End Drinks v EUIPO — Pernod Ricard (The King of SOHO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark The King of SOHO — Earlier EU word mark SOHO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 33 |
| 2021/C 242/45 | Case T-44/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Chanel v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (Representation of a circle containing two interlaced curves) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark representing a circle containing two interlaced curves — Earlier national figurative mark representing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally — Earlier national figurative mark representing a circle containing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)) | 34 |
| 2021/C 242/46 | Case T-191/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — FCA Italy v EUIPO — Bettag (Pandem) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Pandem — Earlier national and international word marks PANDA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 34 |
| 2021/C 242/47 | Case T-201/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark GHISU — Earlier collective national figurative mark CHIANTI CLASSICO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Taking unfair advantage of the distinctiveness or reputation of the earlier mark) | 35 |
| 2021/C 242/48 | Case T-282/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Kerckhoff (APO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark APO — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)) | 36 |
| 2021/C 242/49 | Case T-284/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Klaus Berthold v EUIPO — Thomann (HB Harley Benton) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark HB Harley Benton — Earlier EU word mark HB — Earlier national trade name — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 36 |
| 2021/C 242/50 | Case T-286/20: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Capella v EUIPO — Cobi.bike (GOBI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark GOBI — Earlier EU figurative mark COBI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relevant public) | 37 |
| 2021/C 242/51 | Case T-300/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Nosio v EUIPO — Tros del Beto (ACCUSÌ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark ACCUSÌ — Earlier EU word mark ACÚSTIC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 37 |
| 2021/C 242/52 | Case T-310/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Comercializadora Eloro v EUIPO — Zumex Group (JUMEX) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark JUMEX — Earlier EU figurative mark zumex — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 38 |
| 2021/C 242/53 | Case T-311/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — France Agro v EUIPO — Chafay (Choumicha Saveurs) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Choumicha Saveurs — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith — Declaration of invalidity — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 39 |
| 2021/C 242/54 | Case T-323/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Hell Energy Magyarország v EUIPO (HELL) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark HELL — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 39 |
| 2021/C 242/55 | Case T-326/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Bibita Group v EUIPO — Benkomers (Beverage bottles) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle — Prior international design — Ground for invalidity — Conflict with a prior design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(d)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002) | 40 |
| 2021/C 242/56 | Case T-345/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Robert Klingel v EUIPO (MEN+) (EU trade mark — Application for registration of the EU figurative mark MEN+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons) | 40 |
| 2021/C 242/57 | Case T-348/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Freistaat Bayern v EUIPO (GEWÜRZSOMMELIER) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark GEWÜRZSOMMELIER — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Neologism) | 41 |
| 2021/C 242/58 | Case T-378/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Denmark; COVID-19) (State aid — Danish air transport market — Aid granted by Denmark to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Guarantee — Decision not to raise any objections — Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Freedom of establishment — Free provision of services — Equal treatment — Duty to state reasons) | 41 |
| 2021/C 242/59 | Case T-379/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Sweden; Covid-19) (State aid — Swedish air transport market — Aid granted by Sweden to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Guarantee — Decision not to raise any objections — Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Freedom of establishment — Free provision of services — Equal treatment — Duty to state reasons) | 42 |
| 2021/C 242/60 | Case T-382/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Lee v EUIPO (Table knives, forks and spoons) (Community design — Application for a Community design representing table knives, forks and spoons — Lack of priority claim — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 67(1) and (2) Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Duty of due care) | 43 |
| 2021/C 242/61 | Case T-388/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (Finnair I; Covid-19) (State aid — Finnish air transport market — Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — State guarantee on a loan — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Duty to state reasons) | 43 |
| 2021/C 242/62 | Case T-442/20: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Grangé and Van Strydonck v EUIPO — Nema (âme) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark âme — Earlier international figurative mark AMEN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Counteraction of visual and phonetic similarities through conceptual differences — Conditions for counteraction) | 44 |
| 2021/C 242/63 | Case T-539/13 RENV: Order of the General Court of 20 April 2021 — Inclusion Alliance for Europe v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — MARE, Senior and ECRN projects — Commission decision to recover sums unduly paid — Applicant which has stopped responding to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate) | 45 |
| 2021/C 242/64 | Case T-202/20: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2021 — Target Brands v EUIPO — The a.r.t. company b&s (ART CLASS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the contested decision — Disappearance of the subject matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate) | 45 |
| 2021/C 242/65 | Case T-221/20: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2021 — Target Brands v EUIPO — The a.r.t. company b&s (art class) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the contested decision — Disappearance of the subject matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate) | 46 |
| 2021/C 242/66 | Case T-462/20: Order of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — ZU v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Officials — Request for information — Rejection of a complaint — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Action manifestly inadmissible) | 46 |
| 2021/C 242/67 | Case T-486/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 April 2021 — Kühne v Parliament (Application for interim relief — Civil service — Officials — Reassignment — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Application for interim measures — No prima facie case) | 47 |
| 2021/C 242/68 | Case T-12/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2021 — PJ v EIT (Application for interim relief — Civil service — Measures for the organisation of work during the health crisis — Prohibition of teleworking outside the country of employment — Application for an exemption — Refusal decision — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Application for interim measures — Urgency — Prima facie case — Balancing of interests) | 48 |
| 2021/C 242/69 | Case T-184/21: Action brought on 8 April 2021 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяин) | 48 |
| 2021/C 242/70 | Case T-185/21: Action brought on 8 April 2021 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяйка) | 49 |
| 2021/C 242/71 | Case T-214/21: Action brought on 19 April 2021 — Múka v Commission | 50 |
| 2021/C 242/72 | Case T-230/21: Action brought on 28 April 2021 — Jalkh v Parliament | 51 |
| 2021/C 242/73 | Case T-232/21: Action brought on 3 May 2021 — Saure v Commission | 52 |
| 2021/C 242/74 | Case T-233/21: Action brought on 3 May 2021 — Meta Cluster v EUIPO (Clustermedizin) | 52 |
| 2021/C 242/75 | Case T-234/21: Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Cristalfarma v EUIPO — Reinhard Kosch (STILAXX) | 53 |
| 2021/C 242/76 | Case T-236/21: Action brought on 3 May 2021 — FZ and Others v Commission | 54 |
| 2021/C 242/77 | Case T-238/21: Action brought on 4 May 2021 — Ryanair v Commission | 54 |
| 2021/C 242/78 | Case T-239/21: Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Dana Astra v Council | 55 |
| 2021/C 242/79 | Case T-246/21: Action brought on 3 May 2021 — FJ and Others v EEAS | 56 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2021/C 242/02

Case C-5/21 P: Appeal brought on 6 January 2021 by Deutsche Post AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 November 2020 in Case T-25/20, Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Pošta Slovenije (Representation of a stylised horn)

2

2021/C 242/03

Case C-26/21 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Dermavita Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-643/19, Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA)

2

2021/C 242/04

Case C-80/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 8 February 2021 — E.K., S.K. v D.B.P.

3

2021/C 242/05

Case C-81/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 February 2021 — B.S., W.S. v M.

3

2021/C 242/06

Case C-82/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 February 2021 — B.S., Ł.S. v M.

4

2021/C 242/07

Case C-152/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 9 March 2021 — SIA ‘Ogres HES’ v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija, Ekonomikas ministrija, Finanšu ministrija

4

2021/C 242/08

Case C-162/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 11 March 2021 — Pesticide Action Network Europe ASBL, Nature et Progrès Belgique ASBL, TN v État belge, represented by the Ministre des Classes moyennes, des Indépendants, des P.M.E., de l’Agriculture et de l’Intégration sociale, chargé des Grandes villes

6

2021/C 242/09

Case C-175/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 17 March 2021 — Harman International Industries v AB SA

7

2021/C 242/10

Case C-179/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 23 March 2021 — absoluts-bikes and more- GmbH & Co. KG v the-trading-company GmbH

8

2021/C 242/11

Case C-197/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 29 March 2021 — Soda-Club (CO2) SA, SodaStream International BV v MySoda Oy

8

2021/C 242/12

Case C-199/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 30 March 2021 — DN v Finanzamt Österreich

9

2021/C 242/13

Case C-217/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 April 2021 — AGRO — EKO 2013 EOOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’

10

2021/C 242/14

Case C-221/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 (Czech Republic) lodged on 26 March 2021 — Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. and Others

11

2021/C 242/15

Case C-222/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 (Czech Republic) lodged on 22 March 2021 — České dráhy, a.s.

12

2021/C 242/16

Case C-227/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 9 April 2021 — ‘HA.EN.’ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija

12

2021/C 242/17

Case C-231/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 12 April 2021 — IA

13

2021/C 242/18

Case C-238/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 13 April 2021 — Porr Bau GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Graz-Umgebung

14

2021/C 242/19

Case C-241/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 14 April 2021 — I.L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet

14

General Court

2021/C 242/20

Case T-842/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Repower v EUIPO — repowermap.org (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark REPOWER — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))

16

2021/C 242/21

Case T-872/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — repowermap.org v EUIPO — Repower (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark REPOWER — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) — Freedom of expression)

16

2021/C 242/22

Case T-29/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — RQ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Director-General of OLAF — Decision waiving the applicant’s immunity from legal proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Duty of assistance and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials — Legitimate expectations — Presumption of innocence — Principle of sound administration)

17

2021/C 242/23

Case T-584/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 –Primart v EUIPO — Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz — Earlier national word marks PRIMA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Referral)

18

2021/C 242/24

Case T-69/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Verband Deutscher Alten und Behindertenhilfe and CarePool Hannover v Commission (State aid — Independent social action — Subsidies granted to associations in a regional working group for charity action — Rejection of a complaint — Decision not to raise any objections at the end of the preliminary examination stage — Action for annulment — Status of interested party — Safeguarding of procedural rights — Substantial effect on competitive position — Admissibility — No serious difficulties — No substantial alteration to existing aid)

18

2021/C 242/25

Case T-561/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission (State aid — Postal sector — Compensation for the discharge of the universal service obligation — Decision not to raise any objections — Calculation of the compensation — Net avoided cost methodology — Taking into account the intangible benefits of the universal service — Use of funds granted as compensation — State guarantee of redundancy payments in the event of bankruptcy — VAT exemption for certain transactions carried out by the universal service provider — Accounting allocation of common costs between universal service activities and non-universal service activities — Capital contribution from a public undertaking in order to avoid the bankruptcy of its subsidiary — Complaint from a competitor — Decision finding no State aid after the preliminary examination stage — Existing aid — Advantages granted on a periodic basis — Whether imputable to the State — Private investor test)

19

2021/C 242/26

Case T-611/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma v EMA (Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for a generic version of the medicinal product Tecfidera — Decision of the EMA not to validate the application for marketing authorisation — Previous decision of the Commission taking the view that Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate was not covered by the same global marketing authorisation as Fumaderm — Plea of illegality — Admissibility — Previously authorised combination medicinal product — Subsequent marketing authorisation for a component of the combination medicinal product — Assessment of the existence of two different global marketing authorisations — Manifest error of assessment)

20

2021/C 242/27

Case T-45/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Acron and Others v Commission (Dumping — Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia — Request for partial interim review — Termination of the partial interim review — No change of circumstances — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)

21

2021/C 242/28

Case T-252/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Pech v Council (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Protection of legal advice — First subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Protection of the decision-making process — Refusal to grant full access to a legal opinion of the Council’s Legal Service)

22

2021/C 242/29

Case T-260/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Al Tarazi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Rights of defence — Right to property — Right to exercise an economic activity — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality)

22

2021/C 242/30

Case T-285/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreement — The MARSOL Project — Eligible costs — OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible — Repayment of sums paid — Burden of proof — Principle of good faith — Right to be heard — Principle of sound administration — Rights of the defence — Proportionality)

23

2021/C 242/31

Case T-300/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Achema and Lifosa v Commission (State aid — Market in electricity generated from renewable energy sources — Operating aid — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market at the end of the preliminary examination stage — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Infringement of procedural rights — 2008 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection — 2014 Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 — Article 30 TFEU — Article 110 TFEU — Body of consistent evidence)

24

2021/C 242/32

Case T-322/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — El-Qaddafi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment)

24

2021/C 242/33

Case T-509/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark FLÜGEL — Earlier national word marks ... VERLEIHT FLÜGEL and RED BULL VERLEIHT FLÜÜÜGEL — Relative grounds for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 70(2) and Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

26

2021/C 242/34

Case T-525/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Intering and Others v Commission (Public contracts — Tendering procedure — Reduction of dust and nitrogen oxide emissions at the Kosovo B thermal power plant, Units B1 and B2 — Rejection of the application — Application for annulment submitted in the reply — New claims — Manifest inadmissibility — Amendment of the selection criteria during the procedure — Equal treatment)

26

2021/C 242/35

Case T-540/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Sharif v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to exercise an economic activity)

27

2021/C 242/36

Case T-543/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Romania v Commission (Cohesion Fund and ERDF — Article 139(6) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 — Temporal application of an increased co-financing rate adopted after submission of the final application for interim payment but before acceptance of the accounts — Legitimate expectation — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of good administration)

28

2021/C 242/37

Case T-555/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI — Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Detriment to reputation — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

28

2021/C 242/38

Case T-579/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann v EUIPO (Gymnastic or sports equipment) (Community design — Multiple application for community designs representing gymnastic or sports equipment — Right of priority — Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty — Article 4 of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property — Priority period)

29

2021/C 242/39

Case T-615/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Point Tec Products Electronic v EUIPO — Compagnie des montres Longines, Francillon (representation of two extended wings around a triangle) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing two extended wings around a triangle — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 72(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

30

2021/C 242/40

Case T-644/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Linde Material Handling v EUIPO — Verti Aseguradora (VertiLight) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark VertiLight — Earlier national word mark VERTI — Relative ground for refusal — No damage to reputation — No link between the marks at issue — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

30

2021/C 242/41

Case T-663/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Hasbro v EUIPO — Kreativni Događaji (MONOPOLY) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark MONOPOLY — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

31

2021/C 242/42

Case T-695/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Falqui v Parliament (Institutional law — Single statute for Members of the European Parliament — Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies — Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions — Change in the amount of pensions for Italian national members of parliament — Corresponding change by the European Parliament in the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy — Acquired rights — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality)

32

2021/C 242/43

Case T-843/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Correia v EESC (Civil service — EESC staff — Members of the temporary staff — Refusal to regrade — Action for annulment — Time limit for complaints — Burden of proving expiry of the time limit — Act adversely affecting an official — Admissibility — Equal treatment — Legal certainty — Action for damages — Non-material damage)

32

2021/C 242/44

Case T-31/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — West End Drinks v EUIPO — Pernod Ricard (The King of SOHO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark The King of SOHO — Earlier EU word mark SOHO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

33

2021/C 242/45

Case T-44/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Chanel v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (Representation of a circle containing two interlaced curves) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark representing a circle containing two interlaced curves — Earlier national figurative mark representing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally — Earlier national figurative mark representing a circle containing two interrupted circles interlaced horizontally — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))

34

2021/C 242/46

Case T-191/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — FCA Italy v EUIPO — Bettag (Pandem) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Pandem — Earlier national and international word marks PANDA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

34

2021/C 242/47

Case T-201/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark GHISU — Earlier collective national figurative mark CHIANTI CLASSICO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Taking unfair advantage of the distinctiveness or reputation of the earlier mark)

35

2021/C 242/48

Case T-282/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Kerckhoff (APO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark APO — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

36

2021/C 242/49

Case T-284/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Klaus Berthold v EUIPO — Thomann (HB Harley Benton) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark HB Harley Benton — Earlier EU word mark HB — Earlier national trade name — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

36

2021/C 242/50

Case T-286/20: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Capella v EUIPO — Cobi.bike (GOBI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark GOBI — Earlier EU figurative mark COBI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relevant public)

37

2021/C 242/51

Case T-300/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Nosio v EUIPO — Tros del Beto (ACCUSÌ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark ACCUSÌ — Earlier EU word mark ACÚSTIC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

37

2021/C 242/52

Case T-310/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Comercializadora Eloro v EUIPO — Zumex Group (JUMEX) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark JUMEX — Earlier EU figurative mark zumex — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

38

2021/C 242/53

Case T-311/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — France Agro v EUIPO — Chafay (Choumicha Saveurs) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Choumicha Saveurs — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith — Declaration of invalidity — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

39

2021/C 242/54

Case T-323/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Hell Energy Magyarország v EUIPO (HELL) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark HELL — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

39

2021/C 242/55

Case T-326/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Bibita Group v EUIPO — Benkomers (Beverage bottles) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a beverage bottle — Prior international design — Ground for invalidity — Conflict with a prior design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(d)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

40

2021/C 242/56

Case T-345/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Robert Klingel v EUIPO (MEN+) (EU trade mark — Application for registration of the EU figurative mark MEN+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

40

2021/C 242/57

Case T-348/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Freistaat Bayern v EUIPO (GEWÜRZSOMMELIER) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark GEWÜRZSOMMELIER — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Neologism)

41

2021/C 242/58

Case T-378/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Denmark; COVID-19) (State aid — Danish air transport market — Aid granted by Denmark to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Guarantee — Decision not to raise any objections — Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Freedom of establishment — Free provision of services — Equal treatment — Duty to state reasons)

41

2021/C 242/59

Case T-379/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Sweden; Covid-19) (State aid — Swedish air transport market — Aid granted by Sweden to an airline amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Guarantee — Decision not to raise any objections — Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Freedom of establishment — Free provision of services — Equal treatment — Duty to state reasons)

42

2021/C 242/60

Case T-382/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Lee v EUIPO (Table knives, forks and spoons) (Community design — Application for a Community design representing table knives, forks and spoons — Lack of priority claim — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 67(1) and (2) Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Duty of due care)

43

2021/C 242/61

Case T-388/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (Finnair I; Covid-19) (State aid — Finnish air transport market — Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — State guarantee on a loan — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Duty to state reasons)

43

2021/C 242/62

Case T-442/20: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Grangé and Van Strydonck v EUIPO — Nema (âme) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark âme — Earlier international figurative mark AMEN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Counteraction of visual and phonetic similarities through conceptual differences — Conditions for counteraction)

44

2021/C 242/63

Case T-539/13 RENV: Order of the General Court of 20 April 2021 — Inclusion Alliance for Europe v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — MARE, Senior and ECRN projects — Commission decision to recover sums unduly paid — Applicant which has stopped responding to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate)

45

2021/C 242/64

Case T-202/20: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2021 — Target Brands v EUIPO — The a.r.t. company b&s (ART CLASS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the contested decision — Disappearance of the subject matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

45

2021/C 242/65

Case T-221/20: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2021 — Target Brands v EUIPO — The a.r.t. company b&s (art class) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the contested decision — Disappearance of the subject matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

46

2021/C 242/66

Case T-462/20: Order of the General Court of 14 April 2021 — ZU v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Officials — Request for information — Rejection of a complaint — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Action manifestly inadmissible)

46

2021/C 242/67

Case T-486/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 April 2021 — Kühne v Parliament (Application for interim relief — Civil service — Officials — Reassignment — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Application for interim measures — No prima facie case)

47

2021/C 242/68

Case T-12/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2021 — PJ v EIT (Application for interim relief — Civil service — Measures for the organisation of work during the health crisis — Prohibition of teleworking outside the country of employment — Application for an exemption — Refusal decision — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Application for interim measures — Urgency — Prima facie case — Balancing of interests)

48

2021/C 242/69

Case T-184/21: Action brought on 8 April 2021 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяин)

48

2021/C 242/70

Case T-185/21: Action brought on 8 April 2021 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяйка)

49

2021/C 242/71

Case T-214/21: Action brought on 19 April 2021 — Múka v Commission

50

2021/C 242/72

Case T-230/21: Action brought on 28 April 2021 — Jalkh v Parliament

51

2021/C 242/73

Case T-232/21: Action brought on 3 May 2021 — Saure v Commission

52

2021/C 242/74

Case T-233/21: Action brought on 3 May 2021 — Meta Cluster v EUIPO (Clustermedizin)

52

2021/C 242/75

Case T-234/21: Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Cristalfarma v EUIPO — Reinhard Kosch (STILAXX)

53

2021/C 242/76

Case T-236/21: Action brought on 3 May 2021 — FZ and Others v Commission

54

2021/C 242/77

Case T-238/21: Action brought on 4 May 2021 — Ryanair v Commission

54

2021/C 242/78

Case T-239/21: Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Dana Astra v Council

55

2021/C 242/79

Case T-246/21: Action brought on 3 May 2021 — FJ and Others v EEAS

56

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN