alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2603

       To suspend temporarily the duty on tolfenpyrad technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on tolfenpyrad technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOLFENPYRAD TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      (4-chloro-3-ethyl-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        1-methyl-N-[4-(p-                                                  31/2015.......
                        tolyloxy)benzyl]
                        pyrazole-5-
                        carboxamide
                        (tolfenpyrad)
                        (CAS No. 129558-
                        76-5) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2933.19.23)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered January 6, 2023

In t he 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00995 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 00996 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 00997 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 00998 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01009 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01010 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01011 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01014 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01015 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01016 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01026 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01027 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01028 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01029 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01030 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 01031 - CR Bobby Carl Jessie , Appellant

V. The State of Texas , Appelle e On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F - 2020660 - M

O RDERThe State’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is

GRANTED , and its brief, received on January 5 , 2023, is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
#### FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Richard M. SEGAL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-56463.

D.C. No. CV-01-03830-GAF.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 11, 2004.

Decided May 14, 2004.

*167Michael J. Bertinetti, Katherine A. Knopoff, Severson & Werson, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Timothy R. Hanigan, Lang Hanigan & Carvalho, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before RYMER and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,* Chief District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

Defendant Richard Segal timely appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment to Plaintiff Ford Motor Credit Company.

1. Michigan law applies, as the parties’ contract provides. In this diversity case we look to the forum state’s choice-of-law rules. *Patton v. Cox,*276 F.3d 493, 495 (9th Cir.2002). Under California law, a choice-of-law provision in a commercial contract is enforced if the chosen state has a substantial relationship to the parties or their transaction unless the chosen state’s law is contrary to a fundamental California policy. *Nedlloyd Lines B.V. v. Superior**168*Court,*3 Cal.4th 459, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 330, 834 P.2d 1148, 1151-52 (1992).

Plaintiffs principal place of business is in Michigan, so Michigan has a substantial relationship to one contracting party. Also, Michigan’s commercial code is nearly identical to California’s in the relevant particulars, so Michigan law is not contrary to a fundamental California policy.

2. Under Michigan law, the lease did not create a security interest. Applying Michigan Compiled Laws § 440.1201(37), and looking at all the facts in the record, we conclude that the lease is a lease, and is not governed by Article 9 of Michigan’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code. For example, the lessee was entitled to terminate the lease at any time, with 30 days’ notice, and was never obliged or even entitled to take title to the property-

3. Plaintiff properly mitigated its damages. First, we decline to reach the argument that the Notice of Default was deficient, because this argument is raised for the first time on appeal. *Whittaker Corp. v. Execuair Corp.,*953 F.2d 510, 515 (9th Cir.1992). Second, Defendant failed to adduce any facts in the summary judgment record to suggest that any of Plaintiffs sales was deficient or produced less than an appropriate amount of offset. Mere speculation that something more might have been accomplished by some other means is not enough.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Daniel
      C. Montano, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
      the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




Date:
                May 5, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Daniel C. Montano**Name:**
              **Title:**
            **Daniel
                C. Montano**
              **Co-President
                and Chief Executive
                Officer**




I,
      Mickael A. Flaa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
      the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




Date:
                May 5, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Michael A. Flaa**Name:**
              **Title:**
            **Mickael
                A. Flaa**
              **Chief
                Financial Officer**




*Signed
      originals of these written statements required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.*




*These
      certifications accompany the Form 10-K to which they relate, are not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933
      or
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date
      of
      this Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
      in
      such filing.*
STATE EX REL. Derrick GARDNER v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-0327

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF BOSSIER**

PER CURIAM:

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.

*302Relator has now exhausted the right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator has filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court, and the district court's ruling denying relief is now final. Hereafter, unless relator can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted the right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before May 13, 2009 to be assured of consideration.

## Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

*OMB Number:*                     1506-0029.                

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                

*Title:*                     Suspicious Activity Report by Insurance Companies.                

*Form:*                     108.                

*Description:*31 CFR 103.16 requires insurance companies to report suspicious activities to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. FinCEN Form 108 is an aid to this required reporting providing the filer with a guide in completing this reporting requirement.                

*Respondents:*                     Businesses or other for-profits.                

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     14,400 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     Russell Stephenson, (202) 354-6012, Department of the Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Shagufta Ahmed, (202) 395-7873, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                

Celina Elphage,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-8306 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Ricardo Bernardes, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness ofthe Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function): 

 

(a) all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 31, 2003
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 11, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20559

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JONATHAN LEE RICHES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-90-2

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jonathan Lee Riches appeals his sentence following his

guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and

for wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1343. He

contends that he was sentenced in contravention of United States

v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

Riches’s plea agreement contained an express waiver of his

“right to appeal the sentence imposed or the manner in which it

was determined,” but he retained the right to appeal “only

(a) the sentence imposed above the statutory maximum; or (b) an
No. 04-20559

-2-

upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, which has not

been requested by the United States as set forth in Title 18

U.S.C. § 3742(b).” The Government seeks to enforce the waiver.

Our review of the record indicates that the waiver was

knowing and voluntary and that, under its plain language, it bars

Riches’s Booker arguments. See United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d

542, 545-46 (5th Cir. 2005). The waiver is not invalid merely

because it was made before Booker. See United States v. Burns,

433 F.3d 442, 450-51 (5th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9

GMAC MORTGAGE

March 10, 2005

REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
KERRY A. LAYDEN
ONE BELVIDERE PLACE
SUITE 300
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941

Re:   ANNUAL OFFICERS
      STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
      YEAR ENDING 2004
      GMACM INVESTOR AGREEMENT # 41040

We hereby certify to the best of our knowledge and belief, that for the calendar
year 2004:

1.    A review of the activities of the Seller / Servicer and of performance
      according to the Seller / Servicer contract has been made with the
      undersigned Officer's knowledge.

2.    To the best of the undersigned Officer's knowledge, and based on such
      review, the Seller / Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under She
      Guides for such year.

3.    If applicable, GMACM has filed the information returns with respect to the
      receipt of mortgage interest pursuant to Sections 6050H, 6050J and 6050P
      of the Code, received in a trade Or business, reports of foreclosures and
      abandonment's of any Mortgaged Property and the information returns
      relating to cancellation of indebtedness income with respect to any
      Mortgaged Property.

4.    All hazard, flood, FHA mortgage insurance and primary mortgage insurance
      premiums, taxes, ground rents, assessments and other lienable items have
      been paid in connection with the mortgaged properties.

5.    All properly inspections have been completed as required.

6.    Compliance relative to Adjustable Rate Mortgages has been met.

7.    Fidelity Bond and Errors and Omissions Insurance coverage is current, in
      full force and effect.

Servicer: GMAC Mortgage Corporation

By /s/ Michael Kacergis
   --------------------

Name: Michael Kacergis

Title:    Manager, Contract Administration
          National Loan Administration Risk and Compliance

500 Enterprise Road
Suite 150
Horsham, PA 19044
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2575 

To reduce the duty on golf club putter heads. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce the duty on golf club putter heads. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GOLF CLUB PUTTER HEADS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Golf club putter heads (provided for in subheading 

9506.39.00) ........................... 3% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2575 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 6, 2023 No. 04-22-00790-CR Aaron V. WELGARZ , Appellant
v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CR-7939 Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief is hereby GRANTED. The Appellant’s Brief is due April 10, 2023. Further requests for extension of time will be disfavored.
It is so ORDERED on February 6, 2023. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
# C_2023083EN.01000701.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/7

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Câmpina — Romania) — criminal proceedings against SNI

(Case C-506/22, (1) SNI)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court - Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient details - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 83/08)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Judecătoria Câmpina

Party to the main criminal proceedings

SNI

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Judecătoria Câmpina (Court of First Instance, Câmpina, Romania) by decision of 1 July 2022 is manifestly inadmissible

---

(1)  Date lodged: 26.7.2022.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2780 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2780

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cypermethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cypermethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYPERMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.74 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Cypermethrin) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w46






Exhibit 10.46




AMENDMENT No. 1 TO CONTRACT



FOR



CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD


Between




Baldwin Technology Company, Inc.

2 Trap Falls Road, Suite 402

Shelton, CT 06484

(“Company”)



and




Gerald A. Nathe

11448 Bronzedale Road

Oakton, VA 22124

(“Chairman”)



This shall constitute Amendment Number 1 to the Contract for Chairman of the Board made as of June
15, 2010 (the “Contract”) between the parties.



The first two bullet points under Section 3.3 of the Contract are hereby modified as follows:





	 	3.3	 	Stockholders meetings and stockholder relations






	 	The Chairman shall:
	 
	 	•	 	Plan Annual Meetings of Stockholders and such special meetings of the
stockholders of the Company (a “Special Meeting of Stockholders”) as may be
called.
	 
	 	•	 	Attend Annual Meetings of Stockholders and such Special Meetings of
Stockholders as may be called.




The rest of the Contract shall remain as originally written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.	 	 	 	GERALD A. NATHE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

Mark T. Becker

President & CEO
	 	 
	 	 

	 	 






1