alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 15, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00476-CV

ROBERT DANIEL BUNDRANT, Appellant 

V.

CAPCOR ORCHARD GREEN, LTD., TEXAS FAST CASH, INC., SENOR 

INSTANT CASH, INC., AND GESSNER SENOR, INC., Appellees 

On Appeal from the 270th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-22672 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed May 23, 2019, granting 

“Counter-Plaintiffs, Texas Fast Cash, Inc., Senor Instant Cash, Inc.’s . . . Motion for 

Summary Judgment.” 

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har–

Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.2001). A final judgment is one that disposes 

of all pending claims and parties. See id. at 200. Interlocutory orders may be 

appealed only if permitted by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 
2

S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 

272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

The partial summary-judgment order on appeal is not final because it does not 

dispose of all pending claims and parties. No statute permits an interlocutory appeal 

of the partial summary judgment appellant attempts to appeal. Therefore, the order 

is not appealable. See Clark v. Pimienta, 47 S.W.3d 485, 485 (Tex. 2001) (per 

curiam). 

On July 25, 2019, this court notified the parties of its intention to dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless, by August 5, 2019, a response was filed 

showing meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 

No response was filed. 

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.
June 30 , 2015

Mr. Brian Albright

Albright Managed Networks, LLC

112 W 8 th St suite B

Port Angeles, WA 98362

Dear Mr. Albright :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we c an not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 27 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0796 ),

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the ex emption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your req uest any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Table of Contents

 

Exhibit 13.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**UNDER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of CPFL Energia S.A. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2436 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cyanuric chloride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cyanuric 

chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYANURIC CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.45 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 cyanuric chloride) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2436 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IJEOMA MADUFORO,

Plaintiff,

v . URBAN SERVICE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 09-0287 (JR)

MEMORANDUM
The plaintiff in this employment case complains of race and gender discrimination and retaliation. She asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (count I, for harassment; count III, for retaliation), and under the D.C. Human Rights Act (count II, for harassment; count IV, for retaliation). Count III was dismissed on 5/26/09 because there is no cause of action under section 1981 for retaliation arising from gender discrimination, see dkt. #9. The defendant moved for summary judgment 6/25/09 as to the only other federal claim in the case, Count I, see dkt. #15. Under our Local Civil Rules, plaintiff had until 7/9/09 to file her opposition to that motion, or at least to move for an extension of time to do so. She has filed nothing. Defendant's motion for summary judgment will accordingly be granted as conceded, and, since the parties are non-diverse and I have dismissed all of plaintiff's claims over which I had original jurisdiction, I will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over counts II and IV and dismiss them mea sponte for want of subject matter- 2 -

jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). An appropriate order accompanies this memorandum.

JAMES ROBERTSON United States District Judge
Jose RIESGO, a/k/a Juan Jose Hernandez, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1806

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,576
<SECURITIES>                                     4,681
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,215
<INVENTORY>                                      8,586
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,564
<PP&E>                                           9,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,854
<BONDS>                                             38
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           43,191
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (22,692)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,391
<SALES>                                         12,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,790
<CGS>                                            9,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,104)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7682
AVON M. NEAL, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FORMER SUPERINTENDENT SMILEY; MR. EVANS, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-506-5-2BR) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Avon M. Neal, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Avon M. Neal, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Neal v. Smiley , No. CA-01-506-5-2BR (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 22, 2001, entered Aug. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Honorable Ben Atwell, Chairman OpinionNo. C-412

Revenue and Taxation Committee House of Representatives Re: Constitutionalityof Austin, Texas House Bill 309, 59th Legislature,Regular Dear Mr. Atwell: Session. You ask the opinion of the Attorney General as to whether .HouseBill 309i.59thLegislature,Regular Session, is constitutional, Our opinion is that H. B. No. 309 is constitutional. Rouse Bill No. 309, in effect,merely adds to thepresent motor fuel tax statutes (Chapter9 of Title 122A, TaxationGeneral, Reviced Civil Statutes)provisions allocatingunclaimed tax refunds onmotor fuelused in motor boats in the same manner in which these statutesnow allocateunclaimed tax refunds on motor fuelused in aircraft. The unclaimed refunds on such fuel used in aircraft remain unaffected by this Rill; the unclaimed refunds on fuel used in motor boats are allocated to the Water Recreation Safety Fund. In opinion WW-11&l (1961) the then Attorney Generalheld that the amendments of Section (6a), (13),and (14) of Article 9.13 (Acts 1961) whichmade allocation of unclaimed refunds of motor fuelused in aircraft were constitutional. By virtue of the holding in Attorney General's opinion WX-1140 it is our opinion that House Bill No. 309 is constitutional.

-1943-Honorable Ben Atwell, Page 2 OpinionNo. C-412

SUMMARY ------- House Bill No. 309 pending before the 59th Legislature, Regular Session, is constitutional.

Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General of Texas

WEA:dl APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Pat Bailey John Reeves Paul Phy Milton Richardson APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Stanton Stone

-1944-
f8k101811ex10i_vantone.htm


Exhibit 10.1




 


Stock Right Transfer Agreement







 


Party A:  Honggang Yu


 


Party B: Shenyang Vantone Healthcare Products Manufacturing Co., Ltd.


 


 


1. Both parties have discussed and agreed that Party A agrees to transfer its stock right, which is worth 18  million yuan (RMB),  of Shenyang Vantone Yuan Trading Company, Ltd to Party B.  Party B agrees to spend 18  million yuan (RMB) to purchase Party A’s stock right of  the Shenyang Vantone Yuan Trading Company, Ltd, which is worth 18 million yuan (RMB).


 


2. There are three copies of this agreement. (One copy be filed with the corporate registration administration, Part A and party B each has a copy). This agreement will take effect immediately after both parties sign it.


 


 


Party A Seal/Signature:          Signature of Honggang Yu


 


Party B Seal/Signature:          Seal of Shenyang Vantone Healthcare Products Manufacturing Co., Ltd.


 


 


Date: 10/12/2011


 


Seal of Shenyang Vantone Yuan Trading Co., Ltd.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.0

                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

     In connection with the Annual Report of Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of
Pennsylvania (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Thomas A. Vento, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph R. Corrato,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 22, 2006                /s/ Thomas A. Vento
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Thomas A. Vento
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: December 22, 2006                /s/ Joseph R. Corrato
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Joseph R. Corrato
                                       Executive Vice President,
                                       Chief Financial Officer and
                                       Chief Accounting Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO PRUDENTIAL BANCORP, INC. OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY PRUDENTIAL BANCORP, INC. OF PENNSYLVANIA AND FURNISHED
TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# C_2004279EN.01S00301.xml

| 16.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/s3

---

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2651 

To suspend temporarily the duty on baby or child carriers designed for 

use on bicycles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on baby or child carriers 

designed for use on bicycles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BABY OR CHILD CARRIERS DESIGNED FOR USE 

4 ON BICYCLES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Baby or child carriers designed for use on bicycles 

(provided for in subheading 

8714.99.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2651 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Robert A. WEST, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D17-3808

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018

Robert A. West, Avon Park, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the July 6, 2016 post-conviction order rendered in Case No. 2006-CF-006241-A-O, in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Document

Exhibit 10.3


Executive Officer Compensation


The annual base salaries for our executive officers as of January 1, 2021 are as follows:
																		
	Name		Title			
	Vivek Jain		Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer		$	650,000 		
	Christian Voigtlander		Chief Operating Officer		$	420,000 		
	Brian M. Bonnell		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer		$	395,000 		
	Daniel Woolson		Corporate Vice President, General Manager - Infusion Systems		$	300,000 		
	Virginia Sanzone		Corporate Vice President, General Counsel		$	300,000
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the use of our report dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the financialstatements of Place Portfolio Lessee, LLC as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K and the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-136147 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-136148 on Form S-3 and RegistrationStatement No. 333-136145 on Form S-8 of Education Realty Trust, Inc. for the year ended December31, 2006./s/ Windham Brannon, P.C.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-552-802]


Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of the Second New 
Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emeka Chukwudebe, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0219.

Background

    On January 28, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published the preliminary results of the second new shipper review for 
the period February 1, 2007, through January 31, 2008. See Certain 
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 
Preliminary Results of the Second New Shipper Review, 74 FR 4923 
(January 28, 2009) (``Preliminary Results''). The final results are 
currently due on April 16, 2009.

Extension of Time Limits for Final Results

    Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(``Act''), and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1) require the Department to issue the 
final results in a new shipper review of an antidumping duty order 90 
days after the date on which the preliminary results are published. The 
Department may, however, extend the deadline for completion of the 
final results of a new shipper review to 150 days after the date on 
which the preliminary results are published if it determines that the 
review is extraordinarily complicated. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).
    The Department determines that this new shipper review involves 
extraordinarily complicated methodological issues, including the 
intermediate input methodology. Therefore, in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), the Department is 
extending the time limit for these preliminary results by 60 days, 
until no later than Monday, June 15, 2009.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).

    Dated: April 9, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
 [FR Doc. E9-8626 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# L_2013218EN.01S00301.xml

| 14.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 218/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 218/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,062,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       9,527,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,004,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,749,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,004,427
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,294,973
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  891,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            201,435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   201,435
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>