alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release No. 0024.09

Contact:

Weldon Freeman (202) 690-1384

 

USDA APPROVES FIRST EVER GUARANTEED LOAN FOR COMMERCIAL -

SCALE CELLULOSIC ETHANOL PLANT

Funding for Wood-chip Plant Paves Way for Next Generation of Biofuels

 

WASHINGTON, Jan. 16, 2009 - Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer announced today that 

USDA Rural Development has approved the first ever loan guarantee to a commercial-scale 

cellulosic ethanol plant. The $80 million loan to Range Fuels Inc., Soperton, Ga., comes from 

the Section 9003 Biorefinery Assistance Program authorized by the 2008 Farm Bill. 

"The investment in this facility - which will make cellulosic ethanol from wood chips - has 

the potential to significantly advance the timetable for second generation ethanol production in 

this country," Schafer said. "I visited the pilot plant last October and was excited to see how 

well the technology works. The funding announced today helps the Bush administration fulfill 

its commitment to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil by developing alternative, 

renewable energy sources. USDA is proud to work with the private sector to lead this 

important breakthrough in renewable energy production." 

The Biorefinery Assistance Program promotes the development of new and emerging 

technologies for the production of advanced biofuels - defined as fuels that are not produced 

from food sources. The program provides loan guarantees to develop, construct and retrofit 

viable commercial-scale biorefineries producing advanced biofuels. The maximum loan 

guarantee is $250 million per project. The program is designed to create energy-related jobs 

and economic development in rural America. The loan to Range Fuels is approved subject to 

conditions. 

The project is expected to produce an estimated 63 jobs. When fully operational in 2010, 

the plant is expected to produce approximately 20 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol per 

year. 

USDA Rural Development's mission is to increase economic opportunity and improve the 

quality of life for rural residents. Rural Development has invested more than $111 billion since 

2001 for equity and technical assistance to finance and foster growth in homeownership, 

business development, and critical community and technology infrastructure. More than 2 

million jobs have been created or saved through these investments. Further information on 

rural programs is available at a local USDA Rural Development office or by visiting USDA 

Rural Development's web site at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov.

#

Release No. 0024.09 Page 1 of 1

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1RD?printable=true&contentidonly=... 1/22/2010
Eva LANA, Appellant, v. Alexander P. ALEXANDER, Plato J. Alexander and George Felos, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-1666

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 4/25/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 95-2098

v. (D.C. No. CR-94-310-JP)

CHRISTOPHER CHAVEZ, (D. N.M.)

Defendant - Appellant.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Defendant Christopher Chavez pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute marijuana. Based on the conspiracy plea and two prior felony convictions, Mr.

Chavez was sentenced as a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2. 
2

Mr. Chavez argues that the Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority when it

included conspiracy charges as predicate offenses for purposes of the career offender

guidelines. Unfortunately for Mr. Chavez, we have previously rejected this argument. 

United States v. Allen, 24 F.3d 1180, 1186-87 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 493

(1994).

Mr. Chavez admits that Allen controls this case. He requests, however, that we

“revisit and vacate” our previous holding. He unabashedly offers no basis for doing this

other than his belief that Allen was poorly reasoned. This is insufficient for us to do what

Mr. Chavez asks. As we have said before, “We are bound by the precedent of prior

panels absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision by the Supreme

Court.” United States v. Killion, 7 F.3d 927, 930 (10th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct.

1106 (1994). We do not believe the Killion case needs revisiting either.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
v237484_ex10-15 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
Summary of Board of Director Compensation of Mosaic



 Exhibit 10(iii)(f) 

SUMMARY OF 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM 
 Non-Employee Directors 
 The policy adopted by the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of The Mosaic Company (“Mosaic”) on July 21, 2011 provides for cash compensation to non-employee directors as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $180,000 to the Chairman of the Board and $90,000 to each other director; 



 

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $20,000 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee; 



 

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $15,000 to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee; and 



 

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $10,000 to each director who serves as Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Environmental, Health,
Safety and Sustainable Development Committee. 


 In addition, the policy adopted by the Board provides for an
annual grant of restricted stock units providing grants of Mosaic common stock, valued at $260,000 for the Chairman of the Board and $155,000 for each other director. 
 Mosaic does not pay meeting fees or provide any perquisites to our directors. Mosaic does reimburse directors for travel and business expenses incurred in connection with meeting attendance.
STATE EX REL. Blake THOMPSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0567

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST FELICIANA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a *1002successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
#### Gary Mandel KELLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. MESKE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-16446.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Gary Mandel Kelly, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

David A. Rhodes, DAG, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Gary Mandel Kelly appeals pro se the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we review de novo. *See Miles v. Prunty,*187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm.

The district court properly determined that Kelly was only entitled to statutory tolling during his second full round of state habeas review. *See Biggs v. Duncan,*339 F.3d 1045, 1048 (9th Cir.2003) (stating that a state court prisoner is not entitled to tolling between his first completed round of state habeas review and the commencement of another round); *King v. Roe,*340 F.3d 821, 823 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam) (stating that if a state prisoner’s subsequent state court habeas petitions are not limited to an elaboration of the facts relating to the claims in the first round, the subsequent petitions constitute new rounds and the gap between the rounds is not tolled). Even giving Kelly the benefit of *755tolling during his second round of collateral review, his § 2254 petition was untimely.

Kelly’s actual innocence contention cannot satisfy the standards of *Schlup v. Delo,*518 U.S. 298, 316, 115 S.Ct. 851, 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995) to bypass any procedural default, as his argument that he is actually innocent of being eligible for the Three Strikes punishment is foreclosed by *People v. Avery,*27 Cal.4th 49, 115 Cal. Rptr.2d 403, 38 P.3d 1 (2002) (holding that a Texas conviction for burglary qualifies as a prior serious felony under California law as it fulfills the same requirements as the California statute).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2622 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2622

          To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-aminopyridine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-aminopyridine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-AMINOPYRIDINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2-Aminopyridine     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (CAS No. 504-29-                                                   31/2015.......
                        0) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2933.32.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Kenneth SICILIANO, Appellant, v. Christina SICILIANO, Appellee.

No. 4D17-831

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
----

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                             |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report. |

|   | APRIL 15, 2010 |                                       |
|--------|----------------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |           |                                       |
|   |           | /s/ MICHAEL GOLDBERG                       |   |
|   |           | MICHAEL GOLDBERG                           |
|   |           | ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER             |
|   |           | (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL |
|   |           | FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)          |
Joshua A. BAILEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0786

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.64

                                LETTER AGREEMENT

                                    BETWEEN;

SHERIDAN WESTGARDE, a resident of 744 Mobley Road, Tappen, BC., Canada.,

                                      AND,

AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP, a Nevada Corporation in good standing and
publicly traded on the Pink Sheet trading exchange.

I Sheridan Westgarde, am the registered "holder" of 2,007,194 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred Shares of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp, these
shares of which having various rights as defined in the Certificate of
Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 3, 2007, herein
referred to as the "Certificate".

I hereby agree to waive the specific rights of these shares as defined in
sections 4) through 8) and sections 10) through 12) of the Certificate.

This waiver shall be permanent, non-retractable and binding upon the holder's
respective heirs, successors and assigns.

This waiver of the said rights and provisions shall not be deemed or be
constituted as a waiver of any other rights or provisions as defined in the
Certificate.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE EFFECTIVE AS OF May 27, 2007.

EXECUTED THIS 27TH  DAY OF MAY, 2007.


AQUATIC CELLULOSE                                       SHERIDAN WESTGARDE
INTERNATIONAL CORP
                                                        /S/ Sheridan  Westgarde
                                                        -----------------------
/S/ Sheridan Westgarde                                  Sheridan Westgarde
-------------------------------
Sheridan B. Westgarde, CEO
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Anthony M. Marlon, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of Sierra Health Services, Inc. certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this interim report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Health Services, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003	

						By:	/s/ Anthony M. Marlon, M.D.______

							Name: 	Anthony M. Marlon, M.D.

							Title: 	Chief Executive Officer
Sylvia W. HUGHES v. Lesle NELSON and William W. Danley

2150740

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Navidec  Financial  Services,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Robert D. Grizzle,  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  and Chief  Operating
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 1, 2007

/s/Robert D. Grizzle
------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert D. Grizzle, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Tra' Evan LINEBERGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-580

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC.**

Lifeline Systems Company 

111 Lawrence Street 

Framingham, Massachusetts 01702-8156 

A Massachusetts business trust 

Lifeline Systems Securities Corporation

111 Lawrence Street 

Framingham, Massachusetts 01702-8156

Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 

ProtectEmergency Response Systems, Inc. 

3975-A Industrial Way 

Concord, California 94520 

Incorporated in the State of California 

Lifeline Systems Canada, Inc. 

95 Barber Greene Road 

North York, Ontario, Canada M3C 3E9 

Incorporated in the Province of Ontario, Canada
# CA2006070EN.01000101.xml

| 22.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 70/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
Exhibit 99.5

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
REGARDING ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-HE7
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE7

I, Kevin Cloyd, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed Executive
Vice President of New Century Mortgage Corporation (the "Company"), and
further certify as follows:

1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2004 (the
"Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital
I Inc., as depositor, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, as
servicer, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as servicer, the Company,
as servicer, HomeEq Servicing Corporation, as servicer, Aames Capital
Corporation, as responsible party, Mila, Inc., as responsible party,
NC Capital Corporation, as responsible party and Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company, as trustee.

2. I have reviewed the activities of the Company during the preceding
year and the Company's performance under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement and to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement throughout the year.

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set
forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Dated: March 15, 2005

<page>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
March 15, 2005.

By: /s/: Kevin Cloyd
Name: Kevin Cloyd
Title: Executive Vice President

I, Jennifer Jewett, an Assistant Secretary of the Company, hereby certify
that Kevin Cloyd is a duly elected, qualified, and acting Executive Vice
President of the Company and that the signature appearing above is his
genuine signature.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
March 15, 2005.

By: /s/: Jennifer Jewett
Name: Jennifer Jewett
Title: Assistant Secretary