alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: September 16, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 179)]
[Notices]               
[Page 56526]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16se10-44]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Portsmouth

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an Energy Parks Initiative Workshop of 
the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), 
Portsmouth. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, September 23, 2010, 6 p.m.-8 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Ohio State University, Endeavor Center, 1862 Shyville Road, 
Piketon, Ohio 45661.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Bradburne, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Portsmouth/Paducah Project 
Office, Post Office Box 700, Piketon, Ohio 45661, (740) 897-3822, 
Joel.Bradburne@lex.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the 
areas of environmental restoration, waste management and related 
activities.

Tentative Agenda

     Portsmouth SSAB Involvement with Energy Parks--Val 
Francis, Co-Chair.
     Energy Parks Initiative Presentation--Mark Gilbertson, 
DOE-Headquarters.
     Break.
     Questions and Answers from Comment Cards.
     Adjourn.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The EM 
SSAB, Portsmouth, welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory 
committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons 
with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special 
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Joel Bradburne in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. The Deputy 
Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. This 
notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting date 
due to programmatic issues that had to be resolved prior to the meeting 
date.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 10, 2010.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-23117 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
ex10120.htm


    


    


    October
9, 2007

    Mr. Guy
Nissenson

    Xfone,
Inc.

    2506
Lakeland Drive

    Jackson,
MS, 39232

    United
States

    


    Modification of Financial
Consulting Agreement between Xfone, Inc. and Oberon Securities, LLC in
connection with NTS Communications Transaction

    


    Dear Mr.
Nissenson:

    


    Reference
is made to that certain Financial Consulting Agreement by and among Xfone, Inc.
(“Xfone”) and The Oberon Group, LLC, dated February 12, 2004 (as amended,
modified, supplemented, assigned or novated from time to time, the “February 12,
2004 Agreement”).

    


    This
letter serves as a modification to said Financial Consulting Agreement between
Xfone and Oberon Securities, LLC (“Oberon”) only with regards to the acquisition
of NTS Communications Inc. (together with its affiliates and assigns “NTS”) by
Xfone.  In particular, Section 3 of the February 12, 2004 Agreement
shall be replaced with the paragraph below only as it relates to a Transaction
between Xfone and NTS (i.e. – this replacement shall not apply to any other
Transactions):

    


    3.  In
regards to any Transaction with NTS, Client agrees to pay Oberon 2.5% of the
Aggregate Consideration in cash at the closing of such
Transaction.  Notwithstanding the previous sentence, Oberon agrees to
reduce its cash fee under this Section 3 by an amount equal to the Reduced
Amount (as defined in the next section of this Section 3) to the extent that
Oberon receives a fee under the debt financing agreement by and among Xfone,
Inc. and Oberon Securities, LLC dated October 9, 2007 (as amended, modified,
supplemented or assigned from time to time, the “Debt Financing
Agreement”).  The Reduced Amount will be equal to the product of (i)
0.5% (one half of one percent) and (ii) the difference between (a) $40mm and (b)
the size of the total credit facility (which in case shall be greater than $40
million for purposes of this Agreement) in the Debt Financing Agreement utilized
to calculate Oberon’s financing fee pursuant to that Debt Financing
Agreement.  For example, assuming that the Aggregate Consideration is
$42 million and the size of the total credit facility pursuant to the Debt
Financing Agreement is $20 million, Oberon shall be due a fee pursuant to this
Section 3 equal to $950,000 (($42 million x 2.5%) – (0.5% x ($40mm -
$20mm))).  In addition, to the extent that Xfone receives any monies
under section 7.2 of the Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on August 22,
2007 by and among Xfone, NTS Communications, Inc. and the shareholders of NTS
Communications, Inc. (the “SPA”), Xfone shall pay to Oberon an amount equal to
the lesser of (i) 35% of such monies received or (ii) 50% percent of such monies
received less direct expenses Xfone incurred in attempting to consummate the
transaction which in no case shall be less than 20% of the monies received by
Xfone under section 7.2 of the SPA.

    


    Best
regards,

    


    


    /s/ Adam
Breslawsky

    Adam
Breslawsky

    


    


    Agreed to
by:

    


    /s/ Guy
Nissenson

    Guy
Nissenson

    Xfone,
Inc.

    President
and

    Chief
Executive Officer
### NUM BERS 13-0 8-00 167- CR & 13-0 8-00 168- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG
S AB R I N A M AU R I C A/ K/A SA BR INA

L OUIS E C OX, A pp ellan t,
v. T H E S TAT E O F T E XAS , A pp ellee

. On ap pe al f rom th e 3 6th D istrict Co urt of Sa n Patricio C ou nty , T exas . 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ch ief Ju stice Va lde z an d Ju stice s Y añ ez an d Be na v ide s

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel l a n t , S a b r i n a M a u r i ca / k/ a S a b r i n a L o u i s e C o x , a tt e mp t s t o a p p e a l h er convictions for (1) fo rg eryin trial court cause S-07-303 7CR, this app eal 13 -08-00 167 -CR, and ( 2) felony

es cape in tr ial co urt c ause S- 07- 3237- CR , t his appeal 13- 08- 00168- CR

. In each of these cas es, the tr ial co urt has ce rt ified thatthi s “ is a plea- barg ain ca se, and the2

defe n d a n t has N O r ig ht of appea l, ” and “ the d efendant has w aiv ed th e r ig ht of appea l. ” SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 25 .2(a)(2). On Ap ril 3, 20 08, this Court not if ied ap pellan t’s coun sel of the trial court’s cer ti ficat ion s a nd ordered c ounse l to: (1 ) re v iew the re co rds; (2 ) deter mine w hether app ellant has a rig ht to app eal; and ( 3) forw ard to this Co u rt , b y le tt e r, co u n se l’s f in d in gs as to w hether

appel lan t has a ri g ht to appeal , or , alt er nati v ely , adv is e thi s Cou rtas to the existence of

any amen ded certif ication s. On May 9, 20 08, coun sel f iled a lette r brief w ith this Court. Counsel’s resp onse does not e sta bli sh that the c erti ficat ion s c ur re ntl y on file w it h thi s Cou rt are inc or re ct or that appel lan t ot her

w is e has a r ig ht t o appea l. The Tex as Rul es of A ppel lat e Procedu re prov ide that an appeal mustbe d is mis sed if the trial court’s certif ication doe s not sho w thatthe de fe n d a nt ha s the right of app eal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25. 2(d); se e T EX . R. A PP . P. 37 .1, 44.3 , 44. 4. Acco rdingly , the se ap pea ls are D ISM ISSE D. An y

pendi ng moti ons are deni ed as moot. PERC UR IAM Do not p ubl is h. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47 .2(b). Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 26th day

of June, 2008.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vicente Wright, in my capacity as the President and Chief Executive Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending June 30, 2008, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on July 28, 2008 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in
such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.

Dated: July 28, 2008



By:

/s/ VICENTE WRIGHTVicente WrightPresident and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

FERNANDO GONZALEZ-ROMERO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-269

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed August 10, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

Fernando Gonzalez-Romero, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Filed 4/28/98 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

1998 ND 84

State of North Dakota,Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Narcise G. Black Cloud,Defendant and Appellant

Criminal No. 970322

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Leann K. Bertsch, Assistant State's Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.

Wayne D. Goter, Goter Law Office, 723 Memorial Highway, P.O. Box 1552, Bismarck, ND 58502-1552, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Black Cloud

Criminal No. 970322

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Narcise G. Black Cloud was convicted by a jury verdict for unlawful entry into a vehicle, a class C felony.  N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-04.  Black Cloud claims he was denied his right to a speedy trial.  Black Cloud also claims the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the verdict.  We summarily affirm the Criminal Judgment.  N.D. R. App. P. 35.1(a)(3), (7); State v. Murchison, 541 N.W.2d 435 (N.D. 1995).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Herbert L. Meschke
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2643 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on perfluorobutanesulfonyl 

fluoride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

perfluorobutanesulfonyl fluoride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERFLUOROBUTANESULFONYL FLUORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.92 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 perfluorobutanesulfonyl fluoride) is amended by striking 

7 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

8 31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2643 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Randall H. BrownRandall H. Brown, Chief Financial Officer
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1011 Lower Tribunal Nos. F95-547, F94-40664, F94-20414E

________________ 

### Daniel Rodriguez, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer Multack, Judge. Daniel Rodriguez, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Lisa Rae CLAFFEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4488

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DELETION DOCKET FOR KERR MCGEE/REED KEPPLER SITE WEST CHICAGO , ILLINOIS OCTOBER 8 , 2009 NO. DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES 1 02/23/89

- U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record for 44 06/27/02 Removal Action at the Kerr -McGee/Reed Keppler Site (DOCUMENTS CONTAINED ON THE INDEX ARE INCORPO RATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE DELETION DOCKET) 2 05/03/02

- U.S. EPA Public Administrative Recor d for 19 07/23/03 Remedial Action at the Kerr -McGee/Reed Keppler Site (DOCUMENTS CONTAINED ON THE INDEX ARE INCORPO RATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE DELETION DOCKET) 3 09/24/09 Scott, D., Karl, R., Lett er: Illinois EPA’s 1 Illinois EPA U.S. EPA Concurrence on the Delisting of the Kerr
McGee Chemical Corporation Reed - Keppler Park from the National Priorities List
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

July 11, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00336

- CR

Jerrod Maurice YOUNG

, A ppellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR3992 Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the crimina l case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rul es of Appellate Procedure provides : “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal w ill be dismissed pursuant to R ule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be filed within ten days of the date of this order

, showing appe llant has the right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d)

, 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State

, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,072]


Eaton Hydraulics, Greenwood, SC; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 2, 2009, in response to a 
worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Eaton Hydraulics, 
Greenwood, South Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8916 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,412
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,357
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   160
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     62,058
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        425,845
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 524,913
<DEPOSITS>                                     404,451
<SHORT-TERM>                                    72,849
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,573
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,128
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 524,913
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 24,975
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,001
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   205
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,181
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,304
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,996
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,185
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      475
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,937
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,937
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,376
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.02
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,814
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,582
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      232
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,827
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,827
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Exhibit 32.2

I, Stacey L. Moran, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Suffolk Bancorp (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2010                           
|/s/ Stacey L. Moran                               
|Stacey L. Moran                                   
|Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 18003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8820]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Notice of Public Meeting; Sunshine Act

    Notice is hereby given that April 22, 2009, 10 a.m., at the Board's 
meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North 
Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting 
follows:
    (1) Executive Committee Reports.
    (2) Personnel Changes in the Newark and New York City Offices (For 
Discussion Only).
    (3) Briefing on the Long Island Implementation Plan Update.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to 
contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the 
Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: April 13, 2009.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-8820 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Page 1 of 5
 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 5
 

 

Page 3 of 5
Page 4 of 5
 

Page 5 of 5