alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 526/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 526 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6429 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 526

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6429 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2021/C 526/01 | Commission Notice – Guidance on the interpretation and application of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 526/02 | Commission Notice – Guidance on the interpretation and application of Article 6a of Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers (
  1
  ) | 130 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2021/C 526/01

Commission Notice – Guidance on the interpretation and application of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 526/02

Commission Notice – Guidance on the interpretation and application of Article 6a of Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers (
  1
  )

1

130

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# L_2013245EN.01S00302.xml

| 14.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Claire S. BeanClaire S. Bean
Chief Financial Officer
 75
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7165

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT BRUCE GILLINS, a/k/a Gary Waring, a/k/a

Christopher Washington, a/k/a Kelly,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-94-163, CA-97-421-2)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Bruce Gillins, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Gillins, Nos. CR-94-163; CA-97-421-2 (E.D.

Va. July 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8590]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
[email protected].
    Agreement No.: 011275-026.
    Title: Australia and New Zealand/United States Discussion 
Agreement.
    Parties: ANL Singapore PTE LTD.; Hamburg-S[uuml]damerikanische 
dampfschifffahrts-Gesellschaft KG; and Hapag-Lloyd AG.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment deletes A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S as a party 
to the agreement.

    Agreement No.: 012067.
    Title: U.S. Supplemental Agreement to HLC Agreement.
    Parties: BBC Chartering & Logistics GmbH & Co. KG; Beluga 
Chartering GmbH; Clipper Projects Ltd.; Industrial Maritime Carriers, 
L.L.C.; Rickmers-Linie GmbH & Cie. KG; and Universal Africa Lines Ltd.
    Filing Party: Wade S. Hooker, Esq.; 211 Central Park W; New York, 
NY 10024.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes the parties to participate in 
discussions related to the International Council of Heavy Lift and 
Project Cargo Carriers Agreement on non-rate matters of concern to 
heavy lift and project carriers in the U.S. trades.

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: April 10, 2009.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-8590 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```
#### Robert G. RASMUSSEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN MARINO; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-55138.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted: May 10, 2004.*

Decided: May 14, 2004.

Robert G. Rasmussen, San Marino, CA, pro se.

Scott J. Grossberg, Esq., Javan N. Rad, Cihigoyenetche Grossberg & Clouse, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Robert G. Rasmussen appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the City of San Marino (“City”) and various City employees violated his Fourth Amendment rights by harassing him and subjecting him to traffic stops. *169We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review summary judgment de novo, *Oliver v. Keller,*289 F.3d 623, 626 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted defendants summary judgment because the incidents Rasmussen complains of were either valid investigatory entries onto the curtilage of his home, *see United States v. Hammett,*236 F.3d 1054, 1059 (9th Cir. 2001), or valid investigatory traffic stops, *see United States v. Dorais,*241 F.3d 1124, 1130-31 (9th Cir.2001). The district court properly found that Rasmussen failed to establish a material issue of fact as to whether various City employees had acted from improper motives. *See Carmen v. San Francisco Unified School Dist.,*237 F.3d 1026, 1028 (9th Cir.2001) (“A plaintiffs belief that a defendant acted from an unlawful motive, without evidence supporting that belief, is no more than speculation or unfounded accusation about whether the defendant really did act from an unlawful motive.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rasmussen’s motion for reconsideration because he did not present newly-discovered evidence, demonstrate clear error, or show an intervening change in controlling law. *See Weeks v. Bayer,*246 F.3d 1231, 1236 (9th Cir.2001).

Rasmussen’s remaining contentions lack merit.

We deny Rasmussen’s requests for judicial notice.

We deny Appellees’ request for attorney’s fees pursuant to Fed. RApp. P. 39, without prejudice to the filing of such a motion in accordance with Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# ELECTRONICRECORD M"/•/5
COA # 14-14-00702-CR STYLE: Patrick Dale Earvin vThe State ofTexas COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed 

### DATE: July 7, 2015 Publish: No 

### OFFENSE: Indecency with a Child COUNTY: Harris •th r,:. 

### TRIAL COURT: 177UI District Court TC CASE #:1357121

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS STYLE: Patrick Dale Earvin vThe State ofTexas CCA # 

# APPELL*nTyS Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: //Ifffa* JUDGE: hM CjMjl4^- 

# CCADisposition: "WQ DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

# //w-/r

MOTION FOR
ELECTRONIC RECORD
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 16814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8271]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2008-0478]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; LaLoutre Bayou, Yscloskey, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed 
rulemaking concerning the operation of the State Route 46 (LA 46) 
Bridge across LaLoutre Bayou, mile 22.9, at Yscloskey, St. Bernard 
Parish, Louisiana.

DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking is withdrawn on April 13, 
2009.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn rulemaking is available for 
inspection and copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find 
this docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call Kay Wade, Bridge Administration Branch, telephone 504-671-
2128. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the 
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 
telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 25, 2008, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking 
entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulation; LaLoutre Bayou, Yscloskey, 
LA'' in the Federal Register (73 FR 35985). The rulemaking concerned 
the modification of the operation schedule of the draw to allow for the 
more efficient use of personnel by requiring a two-hour notice for 
nighttime openings.

Withdrawal

    At the request of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and 
Development (LDOTD), the owner of the bridge, the notice of proposed 
rulemaking is being withdrawn as it has been determined that the 
present schedule of operation of the bridge provides for the needs of 
the public.

Authority

    This action is taken under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 
1.05-1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    Dated: March 26, 2009.
J.R. Whitehead,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9-8271 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
STATE EX REL. Jesse M. TREVATHAN v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0166

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 72 (Thursday, April 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8698]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,757]


Ferro Corporation, Inorganic Specialties Division, Including On-
Site Leased Workers From Spherion, Toccoa, Georgia; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 15, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Ferro Corporation, Inorganic Specialties Division, Toccoa, Georgia. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on February 2, 2009 (74 FR 
5871).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
inorganic pigments.
    New information provided by the company shows that workers leased 
from Spherion were employed on-site at Ferro Corporation, Inorganic 
Specialties Division, Toccoa, Georgia.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers at the subject firm who were adversely affected by the shift in 
production to Mexico.
    The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently 
under the control of Ferro Corporation, Inorganic Specialties Division, 
to be considered leased workers.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
include workers leased from Spherion working on-site at Ferro 
Corporation, Inorganic Specialties Division, Toccoa, Georgia.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,757 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Ferro Corporation, Inorganic Specialties 
Division, Toccoa, Georgia, including on-site leased workers from 
Spherion, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after December 18, 2007 through January 15, 2011, are eligible 
to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade 
Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of April 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8698 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 10.07


Exhibit 10.07
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Krupp
Realty Fund 7 Financial Statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          33,425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  583,278<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               398,203
<PP&E>                                      23,100,891<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,028,316)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,087,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          731,326
<BONDS>                                     10,246,731<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (890,576)<F5>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,087,481
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,954,900<F6>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,725,920<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             660,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (431,457)<F8>
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0<F8>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F8>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables included in "prepaid expenses and other assets"
on the Balance Sheet.
<F2>Multi-family complexes of $22,785,239 and deferred expenses of $315,652.
<F3>Accumulated depreciation of $13,866,544 and accumulated amortization of
$161,772.
<F4>Represents mortage notes payable.
<F5>Total deficit of the General Partners of ($308,768) and of the Limited
Partners of ($581,808).
<F6>Includes all revenue of the Partnership.
<F7>Includes operating expenses of $1,254,796, real estate taxes of $327,584 and
depreciation and amortization of $1,143,540.
<F8>Net loss allocated $(4,315) to the General Partners and $(427,142) to the
Limited Partners.  Average net loss per Unit of Limited Partner interest is
$(15.71) on 27,184 Units outstanding.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERIC LAMONT WILSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-633, CA-01-4012-6-20) Submitted: April 29, 2003 Decided: May 13, 2003 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Lamont Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eric Lamont Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT
        32**






**CERTIFICATION**






The
      undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63
      of
      title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Pacific Coast
      National Bancorp, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Pacific Coast
      National Bancorp on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      Pacific Coast National Bancorp. This written statement is being furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-KSB. A signed
      original of this statement has been provided to Pacific Coast National Bancorp
      and will be retained by Pacific Coast National Bancorp and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:
      March 24, 2006









/s/
      Colin M.
      Forkner


Colin
      M.
      Forkner


Chief
      Executive Officer








/s/
      Terry
      Stalk


Terry
      Stalk


Chief
      Financial Officer