alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
 Certification
 
 I, Annette Banks, Chief Financial Officer of Habersham Bancorp, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Habersham Bancorp; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have: 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and, 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: August 11, 2004/s/ Annette BanksAnnette BanksChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
13.1














CERTIFICATION
OF NIKOLAOS CACOS


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002












Exhibit
13.1














CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Amera Resources Corporation (the ACompany@) on Form
20-F, for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I,
Nikolaos Cacos, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.








Dated:    June
30, 2008





/s/ Nikolaos
Cacos


Nikolaos
Cacos,


Chief
Executive Officer, President


and
Director
Exhibit 10.41  RETENTION BONUS AGREEMENT THIS RETENTION BONUS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into as of July 18, 2006 by and between Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), and  (the Executive). 1.  Defined Terms.  All capitalized terms used in this Agreement and not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Change of Control Agreement between the Company and the Executive dated as of May 5, 2006. 2.  Bonus Payment.  The Company shall pay the Executive $50,000 (the Bonus Payment) on July 18, 2007, provided the Executive continues as of that date to serve as an employee of the Company.  If prior to such date either (i) the Executives employment is terminated by the Company for any reason other than Cause or Disability, or (ii) the Executive resigns his or her employment for Good Reason, then the Company shall pay the Bonus Payment to the Executive upon such occurrence, in addition to any other amounts the Executive may be due: 3.  Miscellaneous. (a) Withholding Taxes.  All payments made under this Agreement will be subject to reduction to reflect taxes required to be withheld by law. (b) Choice of Law.  The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of California. (c) Arbitration.  Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, will be settled by arbitration in San Francisco in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association.  Discovery will be permitted to the same extent as in a proceeding under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including (without limitation) such discovery as is specifically authorized by section 1283.05 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, without need of prior leave of the arbitrator under section 1283.05(e) of such Code.  Judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.  All fees and expenses of the arbitrator and such Association and attorney fees will be paid as determined by the arbitrator. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year first above written. EXECUTIVE:NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,052
<SECURITIES>                                       110
<RECEIVABLES>                                      539
<ALLOWANCES>                                        39
<INVENTORY>                                        597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,366
<PP&E>                                          64,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,701
<BONDS>                                         10,129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           690
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,983
<SALES>                                          1,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,136
<CGS>                                            1,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,136
<INCOME-TAX>                                       379
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       757
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
exv10w29



 





Exhibit 10.29




Director Compensation Summary




(effective as of April 1, 2007)




     Employee directors receive no additional compensation other than their normal salary for
serving on the Board or its committees. Non-employee directors receive $45,000 annually. In
addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives a $25,000 annual retainer. The Chairmen of
the Compensation and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees each receive an additional
$20,000 annual retainer. Each Audit Committee member (other than the Chairman of the Committee)
receives and additional $12,500 annual retainer. Each member of the Compensation and Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committees (other than the Chairmen of those Committees) receives an
additional 10,000 annual retainer. Outside directors also receive an initial grant, upon first
election or appointment, and an annual grant of shares of 10,000 shares of restricted stock.
---

EXHIBIT 99.10

VIA EDGAR

|To: | United States Securities and Exchange | 
|--- | ------------------------------------- | 
|    | Commission                            | 
|    |                                       | 
|Re: | Great Panther Silver Limited          | 
|    | (the Company)                       | 
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F            | 
|    | Consent of Expert                     | 

This consent is provided in connection with the Companys
annual report on Form 40-F to be filed by the Company with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto (the Annual
Report). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things,
the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the
Annual Information Form), and the Companys Management Discussion and
Analysis for the financial years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (the
MD&A).

I, Tudorel Ciuculescu, M.Sc, P.Geo. of RPA Inc., hereby consent
to:

- the use of my name in connection with my involvement in the preparation of
  the technical report entitled Technical Report on the Topia Mine, State of
  Durango, Mexicoand dated February 27, 2013 (the Technical
  Report);
- references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual
  Information Form and the MD&A; and
- the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived
  from the Technical Report in the Annual Report and the MD&A.

Dated the 12thday of March, 2013.

*/s/ Tudorel
Ciuculescu*Tudorel Ciuculescu, M.Sc., P.Geo.

---
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0927 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-052-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model AB412 and AB412 EP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 0 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: These actions of this AD are intended to prevent detachment of the hoist hook assembly

from the helicopter and subsequent loss of an external load, possibly resulting in personal injury.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $

Labor per Helicopter

(X x $85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

$

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $

Total US Fleet Cost $

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   212
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,591
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,879)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       212
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,343)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
```
Structured Asset Securities Corporation  Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2004-18H
```

```
Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders for 2004
```

```
Class     Interest             Principal PaidRealized      Ending Balance
          Distribution                       Losses
```

```
A1        221,760.75           2,581,959.55  0.00          25,685,040.45
A2        509,208.21           4,567,091.59  0.00          45,432,908.41
A3        502,538.13           0.00          0.00          42,319,000.00
A4        325,617.60           0.00          0.00          28,192,000.00
A5        508,665.63           0.00          0.00          42,835,000.00
AIO1      605,955.75           0.00          0.00          0.00
AIO2      193,451.78           0.00          0.00          0.00
B1        57,160.85            13,970.73     0.00          4,784,029.27
B2        21,432.33            5,238.30      0.00          1,793,761.70
B3        9,518.86             2,326.51      0.00          796,673.49
B4        5,956.73             1,455.89      0.00          498,544.11
B5        2,382.69             582.35        0.00          199,417.65
B6        2,388.81             583.42        0.00          199,929.58
R         0.40                 100.00        0.00          0.00
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ROGER N. COBB

, §

§ No. 417 , 201 6

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below

— Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ Cr. ID No. 89K02081DI

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: September 29, 2016

Decided: January 4, 2017

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN

, and SEITZ , Justices.

O R D E R

Th is 4 th day of January 201 7

, after consideration of the appellant’s opening

brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, the Court concludes

that the judgment below should be affirmed. The Superior Court did not err in

summarily dismissing the appellant’s fourth motion for postconviction relief . As

the Superior Court concluded, t he motion was procedurally barred and failed to

satisfy the pleading requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is

GRANTED . T he judgment of the Superior Court i s AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
##### 



Exhibit 10.13
 Amendment to
 American Reprographics Company  2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 
 (c)        In connection with each Offering made under the Plan, the Board may specify a maximum
number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by any Participant on any Purchase
Date during such Offering. In connection with each Offering made under the Plan, the Board
may specify a maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by
all Participants pursuant to such Offering. In addition, in connection with each Offering
that contains more than one Purchase Date, the Board may specify a maximum aggregate number
of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by all Participants on any Purchase Date
under the Offering. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, during any calendar year, no
Participant may purchase under this Plan in excess of the lesser of (i) 400 shares of Common
Stock, or (ii) a number of shares of Common Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value
(determined on the date of the purchase(s)) of $25,000.




---



##### 



Amendment to
 American Reprographics Company
2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Offering Document
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
BROOKTROUT TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH BROOKTROUT TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,494
<SECURITIES>                                     2,602
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,960
<INVENTORY>                                     12,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,169
<PP&E>                                          15,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           109
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,463
<SALES>                                         32,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,218
<CGS>                                           12,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                       816
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,584
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 7, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00770

- CR

Tiffany NEMECEK

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 355th District Court, Hood County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR12464

The Honorable Ralph H. Walton Jr., Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED.

Appellant’s brief is due March 7, 2014. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________ Karen An gelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Ex-10.47 2008 Named Executive Officer Compensation



 





Exhibit 10.47




PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.

Named Executive Officer Compensation Summary



The following table sets forth the current base salaries paid to the Chief Executive Officer and
the four other named executive officers of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) and
the amount of the cash bonus paid to these persons in 2008 under the Company’s 2007 Cash Incentive
Plan.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Current Base Salary	 	2007 Cash Bonus
	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	M. Terry Turner — CEO
	 	$	643,000	 	 	$  	—	 
	Robert A. McCabe, Jr. — Chairman of the Board
	 	$	610,000	 	 	$  	—	 
	Hugh M. Queener — CAO
	 	$	300,000	 	 	$  	—	 
	Harold R. Carpenter — CFO
	 	$	300,000	 	 	$  	—	 
	Charles B. McMahan — Sr. Credit Officer
	 	$	200,000	 	 	$  	—	 





In addition to their base salaries, these executive officers are also eligible to:





	 	•	 	Receive cash bonuses under the Company’s 2008 Cash Incentive Plan;
	 
	 	•	 	Participate in a merger-related Special Cash Incentive Plan during 2008;
	 
	 	•	 	Participate in the Company’s equity incentive programs, which currently involves the
award of non-qualified stock options and restricted stock pursuant to the Company’s
2004 Equity Incentive Plan; and
	 
	 	•	 	Participate in the Company’s broad-based benefit programs generally available to its
employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs and the Company’s
401k plan.




Additionally, Messrs. Turner, McCabe and Queener receive a monthly car allowance.



The foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional information regarding the named
executive officer compensation will be provided in the Company’s proxy statement to be filed in
connection with the 2008 annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders.





Page 1
**EXHIBIT 32.0****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**     The undersigned executive officers of Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (the“Registrant”) hereby certify that the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.     Date: September 27, 2006 /s/ Daniel R. Herndon   Name:  Daniel R. Herndon   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer       Date: September 27, 2006 /s/ Clyde D. Patterson   Name:  Clyde D. Patterson   Title:  Executive Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)   *A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HomeFederal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana and will be retained by Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisianaand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0809

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM135AD

757-54-0015, R3 --- 9/19/96

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008