alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON PAGES 2 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          365173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   929387
<ALLOWANCES>                                    169000
<INVENTORY>                                    1073413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2269884
<PP&E>                                         2425928
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1480874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3394218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           625404
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         29705
<OTHER-SE>                                     2336733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3394219
<SALES>                                        5469684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5469684
<CGS>                                          2584322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2584322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                148000<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 58000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (668862)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (668862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (668862)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
<FN>
<F1>REFER TO NOTE 5 TO THE INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





The
      following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Financial Officer
      of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. on the basis of such
      officer's knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002.





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Frederick R. Klug, Chief Financial Officer of Merchants and Manufacturers
      Bancorporation, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.





(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc. for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o
      (d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Merchants and Manufacturers
      Bancorporation, Inc.





/s/
                Frederick R. Klug





Name:
                Frederick R. Klug
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
              Date:
                November 8, 2006
INDYMAC CERTIFICATE TRUST 2004-2

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
("IndyMac Bank"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of September 1, 2004 (the "Agreement"), among IndyMac ABS, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, as mortgage loan transferor (in such capacity,
the "Mortgage Loan Transferor"), Lehman ABS Corporation, as certificate
trust depositor,  IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., a federally chartered bank,
as seller and servicer (in such capacity, the "Seller" and "Servicer"),
and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, a national banking
association, as Certificate Trustee on behalf of the Class A
Certificateholders (in such capacity, the "Certificate Trustee"),
does hereby certify that:

IndyMac Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings
as set forth in the Agreement.

1. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized pursuant
to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Certificate
Trustee.

2. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from the
Closing Date to December 31, 2004, and of its performance under the Agreement,
was conducted under my supervision.

3. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement
throughout the period from the Closing Date to December 31, 2004, and no
default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is
continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

4. The following is a description of each default in the performance of
the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to
me to have been made by the Servicer during the period from the Closing
Date to December 31, 2005, which sets forth in detail ( i ) the nature of
each such default, ( ii ) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to
remedy each such default and ( iii ) the current status of each such default.

5. None.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 1st day of March 2005.

INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.
as Servicer,

By:  /s/  John Law
Name:	  John Law
Title:  VP, Division CFO & Controller
Exhibit 4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

									
	 LOAN NUMBER
	  	 LOAN NAME
	  	 ACCT. NUMBER
	  	 ORIGINAL
 AGREEMENT DATE
	  	 
	156809	  	Optical Cable Corporation	  	19398	  	9/22/06	  	
					
	 NOTE AMOUNT
	  	 INDEX (w/Margin) 
	  	 	  	 MATURITY DATE
	  	 LOAN PURPOSE

	$5,000,000.00	  	30 day LIBOR plus 2.150%	  		  	2/28/08	  	Commercial

 AMENDMENT #1 TO COMMERCIAL LOAN AGREEMENT 
 (Commercial – Revolving Draw) 
 DATE AND PARTIES.
The date of this Amendment #1 to Commercial Loan Agreement (hereafter “Amended Agreement”) is February 29, 2008. The parties and their addresses are as follows: 
  

			
	 LENDER:
	  	 BORROWER:

	VALLEY BANK	  	OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION
	 36 W. Church Ave. S.W.
 Roanoke, Virginia
24011
	  	                 a Virginia Corporation
 5290 Concourse Drive
 Roanoke, Virginia 24019


 WHEREAS, by mutual agreement the parties desire to modify certain terms of that Commercial Loan Agreement
dated September 22, 2006 (“Original Agreement”), 
 NOW THEREFORE, in exchange for mutual consideration, the sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree that the Original Agreement is hereby supplemented, amended, corrected, and restated as follows: 
  

	 	1)	The Original Agreement is hereby extended through April 28, 2008. 

  

	 	2)	Except as supplemented, amended, and corrected herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Original Agreement otherwise remain in full force and effect. 


SIGNATURES. By signing under seal, the parties hereby agree to the extension contained in this Agreement. The parties hereto also acknowledge receipt of a copy
of this Amended Agreement. 
  

											
	BORROWER:	 		 		 	LENDER:    	 		 	
				
	Optical Cable Corporation	 	Valley Bank    	 		 	


											
						
	By:	 	 /s/ Tracy G. Smith
	 	(Seal)	 	By:	 	 /s/ Scott Leffel
	 	(Seal)
	Name:	 	Tracy G. Smith	 		 	Name:	 	Scott Leffel	 	
	Title	 	Vice President and CFO	 		 	Title:	 	Vice President
Claudia RIVAS, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 3D17-1492

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018

M. Gabriela Palacios, for appellant.

Abigail Price-Williams, Miami-Dade County Attorney and Sabrina Levin, Assistant County Attorney, for appellees.

Before SALTER, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*792Affirmed. *Miami-Dade County v. Herndon*, 776 So.2d 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) ; *Grier v. Metropolitan Dade County*, 660 So.2d 273, 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). *See also**Vermeulen v. Worldwide Holidays, Inc.*, 922 So.2d 271, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("The mere happening of an accident does not give rise to an inference of negligence.").
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2710 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on thionyl chloride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on thionyl 

chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THIONYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.28.01 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 thionyl chloride) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2710 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
LaDon M. GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3200

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BROOKTROUT,
INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
BROOKTROUT, INC.'S 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          33,639
<SECURITIES>                                     2,478
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,825
<INVENTORY>                                     19,902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,463
<PP&E>                                          21,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,017
<SALES>                                         47,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,203
<CGS>                                           18,911
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,156
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,895
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,895
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
I, Michael W. Kinley, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 40-F of Cardero Resource Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 11, 2008





/s/ Michael W. Kinley

Michael W. Kinley
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2432 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2432

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Helional.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Helional.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HELIONAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Helional) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
v237484_ex10-22 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
Summary of 2008 Bonus Targets



 EXHIBIT 10.7 
 ICAGEN, INC. 
 Summary of 2008 Bonus Targets 
 Executive Officer 2008 Bonus Targets 
  

			
	 Executive Officer
	  	 Bonus Targets for 2008

	 P. Kay Wagoner, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer and President
	  	Up to 50% of base salary
	 Richard D. Katz, M.D., Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	  	Up to 40% of base salary
	 Edward P. Gray, J.D., Senior Vice President, Intellectual Property, Chief Patent Counsel and Secretary
	  	Up to 40% of base salary
	 Seth V. Hetherington, Senior Vice President, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs
	  	Up to 40% of base salary

 Target bonuses for Dr. Wagoner, Dr. Katz, Mr. Gray and Dr. Hetherington for 2008 will be based
on the achievement of specified corporate performance objectives. The corporate performance objectives include progression of research, preclinical and clinical development programs; increasing awareness of Icagen within the investment community;
achievement of corporate and business development objectives; timely, effective and efficient completion of public company reporting obligations; completing and maintaining policies and procedures for internal controls and compliance obligations;
and further developing the Company’s intellectual property, technology portfolio, advisory panel and publication strategy in order to retain and build value.
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 33 The People &c., Respondent, v. Nelson Miranda, Appellant.

Frances A. Gallagher, for appellant. Andrew E. Seewald, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed. Defendant made a motion to suppress physical evidence "seized from his person" on the basis that the property seized was the fruit of an unlawful arrest. At the conclusion of the suppression hearing, the court found probable cause for the

- 1 -- 2 - No. 33

arrest based on the officers' "observations over a nearly 30- minute period," during which defendant attempted to damage the locks on three different bicycles using a tool in a "sawing" motion. As one officer stopped defendant, defendant dropped a hacksaw. The officer put defendant's hands on a car, handcuffed him, and performed an initial pat down for the safety of the officers and felt a bag on his person underneath his coat. The officers searched the satchel and found pliers, screwdrivers and rubber gloves. The hearing court concluded that the search was incident to a lawful arrest.

"CPL 470.05 (2) provides that a question of law regarding a ruling is presented in a criminal proceeding 'when a protest thereto was registered, by the party claiming error, at [a] time . . . when the court had an opportunity of effectively changing the same . . . or if in response to a protest by a party, the court expressly decided the question raised on appeal'" (People v Graham, 25 NY3d 994, 996 [2015]).

The issue argued on this appeal is whether the warrantless search of defendant's satchel was unlawful as beyond the scope of a search incident to arrest. In particular, defendant contends that the exigencies that existed at the time of the arrest no longer existed at the time of the search because he was handcuffed and the seizure of the satchel was outside of a permissible full search of his person incident to arrest.

Here, the hearing court did not expressly decide, in response to protest, the issues now raised on appeal. The issue

- 2 -- 3 - No. 33

at the suppression hearing was whether the officers had probable cause to arrest defendant. The hearing court's mere reference to "search incident to a lawful arrest" is insufficient to preserve defendant's current arguments for this Court's review.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided March 24, 2016

- 3 -
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2488 

To reduce temporarily the duty on frames and mountings for spectacles, 

goggles, or the like. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on frames and mountings 

for spectacles, goggles, or the like. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FRAMES AND MOUNTINGS FOR SPECTACLES, 

4 GOGGLES, OR THE LIKE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Frames and mountings for 

spectacles, goggles, or the 

like, the foregoing of plastics 

(provided for in subheading 

9003.11.00) ........................... 2.4% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2488 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Jack GRANGER v. JAMES WOODS DEVELOPMENT, INC.

2150938

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2605 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2605

   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on cyan 1 RO 
                          inkjet printing ink.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on cyan 1 RO 
                          inkjet printing ink.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYAN 1 RO INKJET PRINTING INK.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to cyan 1 RO inkjet printing 
ink) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.3%'' in the column 1 general rate of 
        duty column and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE EX REL. Mark MILLER v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0203

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.