AIR MONITORING, INC. 

9548-D Mt. Holly H1111tersv/lle Road • H1111tersvil/e1 NC 28078 

www./lllegrltyalr.llel 

STATIONARY SOURCE SAMPLING REPORT 

FOR 

FLORIMUSA 

CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet & Exhaust 

S02, HCl & HF Sampling 

Integrity Project No. 08-100 Performed: November 18, 2008 

Certified By: 

--------Date __ _ 

James A. Lewis, QSTI 

Vice President 

Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc. 

------- Date __ _ 

J.A. Tony Blanton, QSTI 

President 

Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc. 
Stntionmy Source Sampling Report, Florim USA 

Ki/11 No. 1 Baghousc l11let & Exhaust 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Ja11uary 8, 2009 

l11tegrily Project No. 08-100 

1.0 INTRODUCTION .....••••..•...•.•••••••.•••..........................•..............................•..•.....•..................... 3 

1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 

1.2 Outline of Test Program ...................................................................................................... 3 

Table 1 -Target Pollutants and Reference Methods ......................................................... 3 

1.3 Test Participants .................................................................................................................. 4 

Table 2 - Test Participants ................................................................................................. 4 

2. 0 'RESULTS •.•..•.•••.••...••••••.•••••••••••••••.•••••••••..•.•..•••••••.•...•••.......••...•••...••.•.•....•.•..•••.•.•........•••..••.••• 5 

2.1 Summary of Results ............................................................................................................ 5 

Table 3- Summary ofResults ............................................................................................ 5 

2.2 Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 5 

3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ••••••••••••••.•.•••••••••••.•.•.••.•••••.•.•.•.•••.•••••••••••.•.•....••••••••...••.•••......•.••.. 6 

3 .1 Air Pollution Control Equipment ........................................................................................ 6 

3 .2 Demonstration of Operating Rate ....................................................................................... 6 

4.0 SAMPLING METHODS •••...••..•.•..••.•.•........•••••..•..••..•••••.•.•.••••••••••••••.•..••••..•.••.•.•....••••.•••...••..• 7 

4.1 Sampling Strategy ............................................................................................................... 7 

4.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures .................................................................................. 7 

Table 4 - Sampling and Analytical Procedures .................................................................. 7 

4.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points and Cyclonic Flow 

Determination ......................................................................................................... 7 

4.2.2 Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination ............................. 8 

4.2.3 Dry Molecular Weight Determination ................................................................... 8 

4.2.4 Moisture Determination ......................................................................................... 8 

4.2.5 Sulfur Dioxide Sampling and Analysis .................................................................. 8 

4.2.6 Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride Sampling and 

Analysis .................................................................................................................. 9 

4.2.7 Sampling Ports and Points ................................................................................... 10 

Figure 1 - Baghouse Inlet Location of Sampling Ports ................................................... 11 

Figure 2 - Baghouse Exhaust Location of Sampling Ports .............................................. 12 

4.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................ 13 

Table 6- Project QA Activities and Results .................................................................... l3 

5.0 APPENDICES ...•...•••••••.•.•••...•••....•••••..•..•..•.••.••..........•.•.....•••.•.••.•...••...••••...•.••........••.........•.•. 14 

1. Detailed Summary ofResults and Example Calculations 

2. Field Data Sheets 

3. Laboratory Documentation 

4. Calibration Documentation 

5. Facility Production Documentation 

/NTJ-:GR/11' AIR MONITORING, INC. Pnge2 
Slationmy Source Sampling Report, Florim USA 

Kiln No. J Bagllouse inlet & Exllat1st 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

Jamlm)' 8, 2009 

llllegriry Project No. 08-JOO 

This test program was performed at the Florim USA facility in Clarksville, Tennessee. This section of the 

report describes the test purpose and provides a brief outline of the test activities and the personnel involved 

in the test program. 

1.1 Purpose 

The purpose ofthe test was to quantify sulfur dioxide (802), hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen fluoride 

(HF) emissions associated with the baghouse serving Kiln No. 1. The sampling was not required by the 

facility air pennit, but will be used for future air permit modifications. 

1.2 Outline of Test Program 

Integrity Air Monitoting, fuc. (Integrity) performed stationary source sampling at the Kiln No. 1 baghouse 

inlet and exhaust on November 18, 2008. The sampling included three 1-hour sampling runs for the target 

pollutants. The following table provides the target pollutants and United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (US EPA) reference methods used in the test program. 

Table 1 -Target Pollutants and Reference Methods 

Pollutant Reference Method 

802 6 

HCI&HF 26 

In addition to the sampling performed for the target pollutants, Integrity also performed US EPA Reference 

Methods 1 through 4 to determine the location of the sampling points, the volumehic flow rate, the 

molecular weight of the stack gas and the moisture content, respectively. 

INmGRJT>' AIR MONITORING, INC. Page3 
Statiollm)l Source Sampliug Report, Florim USA 

Ki/11 No. I Bnghouse /u/et & Ex/must 

1.3 Test Participants 

The following table provides contact information for the test participants. 

Table 2-Test Participants 

Name Title Affiliation 

James A. Lewis Vice President Integrity Air 

Monitoring, Inc. 

Andrew J. Dickson Sampling Technician Integrity Air 

Monitoring, Inc. 

E.W. "Rusty" Caton lV Sampling Technician Integrity Air 

Monitoring, Inc. 

Connie Smith Environmental Health Florim USA 

and Safety Administrator 

Amy B. Spann, PE, CHMM Engineer Bnsafc 

Jonathan Bradley Environmental TDEC 

Specialist 

INTEGRJT}' AIR MONITORING, INC. 

Jammry 8, 2009 

l11tegrity Project No. 08-/00 

.Contact Info 

Telephone: (704) 398-1119 

Facsimile: (704) 398-1113 

jim@integrityair.net 

Telephone: (704) 398-1119 

Facsimile: (704) 398-1113 

andrew@integrityair .net 

Telephone: (704) 398-1119 

Facsimile: (704) 398-1113 

rusty@integrityair .net 

Telephone: (931) 553-7500 

Facsimile: (931) 647-9934 

cjames@florimusa.com 

Telephone: (615) 255-9300 

Facsimile: (615) 255-9345 

aspann@ensafe.com 

Telephone: (615) 532-9195 

Facsimile: (615) 532-0614 

jonathan.bradley@state.~.us 

Page4 
Stal;onary Source Sampling Report, Florim USA 

Kll11 No. I Baglwu.te Inlet & Exhaust 

2.0 RESULTS 

January 8, 2009 

llllegrity Project No. 08-/00 

This section presents the mean sampling results. Detailed sampling results for each sampling run and 

example calculations are presented in Appendix 1. Field data sheets and system bias and drift checks are 

presented in Appendix 2. Data acquisition system uncorrected values and values corrected for system bias 

are presented in Appendix 3. Laboratory documentation is presented in Appendix 4. 

2.1 Summary of Results 

The following table presents the mean results from the sampling performed at the Kiln No. I Baghouse on 

November 18,2008. 

Pollutant Loading Rate, Emission Rate, 0

/o Removal 

lb!hr lb/hr Efficiency (RE) 

so2 6.53 5.82 10.9 

HCI 2.97 2.20 25.9 

HF 1.67 <0.016 >99.0 

2.2 Discussion 

Florim USA will use the results from this test program to demonstrate compliance with air quality permit 

limitations, and for possible future air permit modifications. 

INTEGRJT>' AIR MONITORING, INC. Page5 
Stntioll(rry Source Sampling Report, Florim USA 

Kiln No. J Bngllouse /11/et & Exhaust 

3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 

This section contains a brief description of the process and related control·equipment. 

Jrmunry 8, 2009 

Integrity Project No. 08-100 

The Florim USA facility located in Clarksville, Tennessee produces ceramic tile. Raw tile body 

materials (e.g., clay, silica, calcium carbonate) are shipped to the facility and stored in the raw 

materials storage building. Body materials are mixed with water and blended in the ball mills; 

the blended, wet body material - which is referred to as "slip" - is stored/cured in tanks, and then 

piped to one of the three {3) spray dryers, which process the material into dried "priUs". Prill is 

next pressed into tile shapes, and dried in natural gas-frred vertical dryers. A wet glaze- mixed 

in the glaze preparation area- is then applied to some of the unfinished tiles (a.k.a. "greenware"). 

Glazed greenware is next processed in natural gas-fired horizontal dryers, and stored along with 

unglazed greenware in "B & T" carts. All greenware is fired in one of the natural gas-fired kilns, 

en1issions from which are controlled via a lime injection baghouse. Finished tile is then sorted, 

packaged and shipped to the customer or supplier. 

The tlu·ee lime injection baghouses control emissions from five (5) kilns with Kilns #6 and #7 

(Source 63-0135-09) ducted to one baghouse, Kilns #8 and #9 (Source 63-0135-09) ducted to 

one baghouse, and the new K.iln #1 (Source 63-0135-30) ducted to a single baghouse. The lime 

feeds at a constant rate as designed by the manufacturer, Eurofilter, and each baghouse is 

equipped with a pressure drop gauge. Eurofilter is able to monitor baghouse operations and 

perform diagnostics on the unit remotely and the units are on a routine preventative maintenance 

schedule. 

3.1 Air Pollution Control Equipment 

Emissions from the kiln are controlled by a lime-injected baghouse. 

3.2 Demonstration of Operating Rate 

Process and control device operating parameters corresponding with the sampling were recorded by 

Florim USA and Ensafe personnel. This documentation is included in Appendix 5. 

INTF.GRITI' AIR MONJmR!NO, INC. Pnge6 
Stationary Source Sampling Report, Florim USA 

Kiln No. I Bagllouse /ulet & Exhaust 

January 8, 2009 

flllegrlty Project No. 08-JOO 

4.0 SAMPLING METHODS 

This section describes the sampling strategy, sampling and analytical methods, and the quality 

assurance/quality control pr.ocedures implemented during this project. 

4.1 Sampling Strategy 

The sampling and analytical procedures used during this test program were those established by the US 

EPA and State Regulatory Agency. A Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) detailing the sampling procedures 

and process parameters to be followed during this test program was submitted to the Tennessee 

Department of Environment and Conservation prior to sampling. 

4.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

The following table provides the US EPA reference methods used in this sampling program. 

Table 4 - Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

Reference Method Parameter 

1 Location of Sampling Points 

2 Volumetric Flow Rate 

3 Molecular Weight, 0 2 and C02 Content 

4 Moisture Content 

6 s~ 

26 HCl&HF 

A sampling and analysis synopsis for each of these methods is discussed briefly in the following 

subsections. These test methods are available in the Code of Federal Regulations Volume 40, Part 60 or by 

request from Integrity. 

4.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points and Cyclonic Flow Determination 

The sampling locations were prepared according to the critelia in Method 1. The duct diameters upstream 

and downstream from the sampling ports were measured and documented prior to sampling. The number of 

traverse points was chosen with respect to sampling port location. The amount of cyclonic flow was 

determined according to the criteria detailed in Method 1. 

INTEGRJn' AIR MONITORING, iNC. Page 7 
Stalfonary Source Sampling Report, Florim USA 

Ki/11 No. I Bog!Jouse lnlel & Ex/must 

4.2.2 Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination 

JnmmtJ' 8, 2009 

l11tegrily Pro}ecl No. 08-100 

Method 2 is used to determine the average gas velocity in a stack using the average temperature and average 

velocity head. The temperature is measured with a calibrated thermocouple and the velocity determined 

with a TypeS (Stausscheibe) pitot tube. This method is further used to calculate the volumetric flow rate. 

Measurements of velocity head and temperature at the sampling location were performed at the traverse 

points specified by Method 1. An inclined oil manometer or calibrated magnehelic gauge was used to 

measure the differential pressure. 

The apparatus was set-up according to manufacturer and reference method reconunendations. Pre-test and 

post-test leak checks were conducted for each sampling run. The atmospheric and static pressure of the 

stack was also determined for each set of velocity head readings. The volumetric flow rate calculations used 

were those specified in Method 2. 

4.2.3 Dry Molecular Weight Determination 

Method 3 is applicable for determining carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations and dry molecular weight 

of a sample from a gas stream of a fossil-fuel combustion process. This method may also be applicable to 

other processes where it has been determined that compounds other than carbon dioxide, oxygen, carbon 

monoxide, and nitrogen are not present in concentrations sufficient to affect the results. 

Since the sources were emitting essentially air, a molecular weight of 29.0 was used at each location 

according to Method 2, Section 8.6. 

4.2.4 Moisture Determination 

Method 4 was used to determine the stack gas moistw·e content The moisture content is used to correct the 

concentration or mass emission rate to a dry basis. Moisture determinations for this sampling project were 

detennined in conjunction with the 802 sampling. This procedure is discuss~d in Section 4.2.5. 

4.2.5 Sulfur Dioxide Sampling and Analysis 

Sampling and analysis for 802 was performed according to US EPA Method 6. The principal components 

of the sampling system were sequentially: 

• A heated (248°F ±25°F) glass probe with a plug of glass wool as a filter; 

!NT/WRIT>' AIR MoNnORJNG, INC. Page8 
Stationary• Source Snmpli11g Report, F/orim USA 

Kiln No. I Bngltouse Inlet & Exhaust 

Jn11unry 8, 2009 

Integrity Project No. 08-100 

• An impinger train consisting of four sequential impingers. The first impinger containing 100 

ml of 80% IP A followed by two impingers each containing 100 m1 of 3% hydrogen peroxide 

and a final impinger containing 200 grams of silica gel; and 

• A metering system capable of maintaining a constant sampling rate and accurately determining 

the sample volume according to those specifications in APID-0581. 

The liquid in the first impinger was measured to the nearest milliliter and discarded. The moisture collected 

in impingers two and three was measured to the nearest milliliter and placed in a HDPE sample container. 

The moisture collected by the silica gel in the fourth impinger was determined to the nearest 0.1 gram. The 

collected condensate measurements were recorded on the corresponding field data sheet. hnpingers two and 

three and connecting glassware were rinsed with deionized water and the rinses were added to the HDPE 

sample container. The sample was diluted to 1000 ml as specified in Method 8. All sample containers were 

sealed and the liquid leve]s were marked. The sample containers were transported to Integrity's Air Quality 

Laboratory in Huntersville, North Carolina. 

The sulfur dioxide samples were analyzed by the barium-thorin titration method. A sulfur dioxide audit 

sample was analyzed along with the samples. The laboratory analyses and chain of custody documentation 

are included in Appendix 3. 

4.2.6 Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride Sampling and Analysis 

Sampling for hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride was performed according to Method 26 procedures. 

The principal components of the sampling system were sequentially: 

* A heated (248°F ±25°F) borosilicate glass probe; 

* A heated (248°F ±25°F) Teflon filter assembly with a Teflon filter; 

* 

* 

A mini-impinger train consisting of four sequential impingers. lmpingers one and two 

contained 15 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute sulfuric acid (O.lN H2S04). 

Impinger three contained 15 ml of dilute sodium hydroxide (O.lN NaOH) followed by a final 

impinger containing 15 grams of silica gel; and 

A metering system capable of maintaining a constant sampling rate and accurately 

determining the sample volume according to those specifications in APTD-0581. 

Sample clean-up began immediately after each test run. Hydrogen chloride was collected in the O.IN 

sulfuric acid solution in impingers one and two. The impingers were each weighed separately to the nearest 

gram. The liquid in the first two impingers was placed in a 125ml HDPE storage container along with the 

INTEGRI11' AIR MONITORiNG, INC. Pnge9 
Station my Source Sampling Report, Florim USA 

Ki/11 No. I Bngllouse /11/et & Exhaust 

Jmmmy 8, 2009 

/nteg1ify Project No. 08-100 

deionized water rinse of the impingers and connectjng glassware. The container was sealed with Teflon 

tape and the liquid level was marked. 

The 0.1 N sodium hydroxide solution in impinger three was used as a scrubber to protect the sampling 

console. The impinger was weighed to the nearest gram and the contents were discarded. The silica gel 

impinger was also weighed to the nearest gram and then reloaded. 

The samples and chain of custody were shipped to Element One Laboratory in Wilmington, North Carolina 

where they were analyzed by Ion Chromatography. The laboratory results are included in Appendix 3. 

4.2. 7 Sampling Ports and Points 

The dimensions of the sampling locations and the location of the sampling ports and points are detailed in 

Figures 1 and 2. The drawings provided are not to scale. 

INTF.aRJTY AIR MONITORING, INC:. Page 10 
Stntionm)' Source Sampling Report, Flo1im USA 

Ki/11 No. I Bagllouse btlet & Exhaust 

Baghouse Inlet 

39" 

Sampling Ports 

0 

B 

Jamuuy 8, 2009 

Jmegrity Project No. 08-/00 

~u-----------------------------------------------------------------------~ 54" 126" 

Figure 1 

Location of Sampling Ports 

INTEGRITY AIR MONITORING, INC. Page II 
Stationary Source Sampling Report. Florim USA 

Ki/11 No. I Bngltouse /11/et & Exhaust 

t 

>86.5 

-1~ 

216" l1 

~ 

Baghouse Exhaust 

4 

0 

/ ~ 

~-------

r 

Figure 2 

Location of Sampling Ports 

INTEGRITI' AIR MONITORING, INC. 

A 

Fan 

Jammry 8. 2009 

lmegrily Project No. 08-100 

8 

Page 12 
Stationary Source Sampling Report. Florlm USA 

Kiln No. J Bag/rouse Inlet & E.\·lraust 

4.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 

Jammry 8, 2009 

l11tegr/ty Project No. 08-100 

Integrity Air has established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) guidelines to ensure the highest 

quality sampling and analytical data from source tests. 

Data quality objectives were maintained throughout this project. The following table provides the QA 

activities followed during this sampling project and the results. 

Table 6 -Project QA Activities and Results 

Parameter Criteria Within Limits? 

Sampling Train Leak Check < 0.02 cfm or< 0.04 lpm yes 

Pi tot Tube Leak Check < 0.1 in. H20 in 15 sec. yes 

Console Calibration 'Y +/- 0.02 yes 

Thermocouples +/- 2% of ref. temp. yes 

Quality control procedures for the Methods 6 and 26 sampling have included the analysis of reagent blanks. 

An EPA audit sample for S02 was also analyzed. The results of the blanks and audit sample are included in 

Appendix 3 with the lab results. US EPA Approved Alternate Method AL T -009 was used for the console 

post-test calibration and can be found in Appendix 1. The pre-test and post-test thermocouple system 

calibrations were performed using the procedures found in US EPA Approved Alternate Method ALT -011 

and can be found in Appendix 4. 

Field data and final laboratory results were independently audited and reviewed for verification of data. 

The Emission Test Report is audited for completeness and reasonableness of data. The report requires the 

signature of the project manager and Vice President or President before release to the client. Data and final 

reports are archived in a secured area for a minimum period of three years. 

Integrity's field and laboratory test equipment has been maintained and calibrated in accordance with quality 

assurance procedures established by the US EPA in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution 

Measurement Systems: Volume ill. Equipment calibrations including pre-test and post-test calibration data 

are presented in Appendix 4. 

INFEGRn'Y AIR MONITORING, INC. Page 13 
Stationary Source Sampling Report, F/orim USA 

Ki/11 No. I Bngllouse Inlet & Exhaust 

5.0 APPENDICES 

Jnmtnl)' 8, 2009 

/lllegrlly Project No. 08-100 

The appendices contain detailed support documentation that encompasses the relevant aspects of the 

emission test program. This data serves as the foundation for the test report. The emission test report 

presents a summary of the information gathered during the sampling activities. The following appendices 

have been provided to facilitate the review of the test report: 

Appendix 1 -Detailed Sununary of Results and Example Calculations 

Appendix 2 -Field Data Sheets 

Appendix 3 -Laboratory Documentation 

Appendix 4 - Calibration Documentation 

Appendix 5 - Facility Production Documentation 

INTEGRITY AIR MONITORING, INC. Page 14 
APPENDIX! 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

15 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS CJ 

EPA METHOD 26 A Determination of Hyd~ogen Chloride Emissions 

Florim USA 

' 

Clarksville, TN I 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet All MONITORING, INC:. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg 

Date: 11/18/08 11/18/08 11/18/08 

e Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 

Tstart Start Time 821 945 1112 

Tend End Time 921 1046 1212 

Pbar Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.88 29.88 29.88 29.88 

Pc Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.4412 -0.4412 -0.4412 -0.4412 

Ps Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.439 29.439 29.439 29.439 

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, liters 120.7 120.1 119.8 120.2 

y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 64.9 73.0 72.3 70.1 

Vsro Volume San1pled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 4.08 3.99 3.99 4.02 

Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.034 0.039 0.037 0.037 

PMv Percent Moisture in Stack 3.4 3.9 3.7 3.7 

Mpo Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.966 0.961 0.963 0.963 

Md Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 

Ms Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lbllb mole 28.625 28.571 28.592 28.596 

Cp Pi tot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

~PS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.632 0.630 0.631 0.631 

Ts Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 324.4 324.6 337.6 328.9 

Vs Avg. Stack Velocity, ftlsec 43.8 43.7 44.1 43.9 

A Area Stack, ft2 8.296 8.296 8.296 8.296 

Oso Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 13,951 13,844 13,766 13,854 

QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 21,808 21,757 21,950 21,839 

Osw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 14,444 14,406 14,297 14,382 

16 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 8 

EPA METHOD 26 J& Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions 

Florim USA 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet AIR MONITOitiNO, INC. 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Old Hydrogen Chloride Catch, mg 7.59 7.67 4.36 6.54 

·c Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, mg/dscm 65.76 67.83 38.60 57.40 

Ca Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.029 0.030 0.017 0.025 

CAw Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbslhr 3.43 3.51 1.99 2.97 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentrations and Emission Rates 

md Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 4.17 4.40 2.46 3.68 

c Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, mg/dscm 36.1 38.9 21.8 32.3 

Ca Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.016 0.017 0.009 0.014 

CAw Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 1.88 2.01 1.12 1.67 

17 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26 

Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions 

Florim USA 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse litlet 

Example Calculations Run 1 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

p S = Pbar + p g = 

Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

17.647 * VM(Jiters) * 0.03531 * 'Y * Pbar 

Vsro = -------------------------------------------------- = 

TM +460 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

Vwc 

Bws = ---------------------------------- = 

Vsm + Ywc 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

100 * Vwc 

p MV = --------------------------- = 

Ysro + Vwc 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

100- PMv 

·MFo = ----------------------- == 

100 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

Mel= 0.44 * %C02 + 0.32 * %02 + 0.28 * (100- %C02 - %02) = 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 

Ms = Md * (1- Bws) + 18.0 * Bws = 

Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

(T8 +460) 

Vs = 85.49 * Cp * 8PS * SQRT ------------------------- = 

(Ps * Ms) 

Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 

1058.82 * Vs *A* Ps * (1- Bws) 

Oso= --------------------------------------------------- = 

Ts+ 460 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

QA = v s * A * 60 = 

Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

Osw = Qso * [1/(1-Bws)] = 

CJ 

J& . 

. AIR MONITORING, INC, 

29.439 

4.08 

0.034 

3.4 

0.966 

29.0 

28.625 

43.8 

13951 

21808 

14444 

18 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26 

Detennination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions 

Florim USA 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No.1 Baghouse Inlet 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, mg/dscm 

md 

c == -------------------------------- == 

Vsm * 0.02831 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 

md * 0.0154 

Ca = ------------------------------- = 

VsTo 

Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

CAw= 0.00857 * Ca !fc· Qso 

Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

CJ 

J& 0 

. Alit MONITOit!HO, INC. 

65.760 

0.029 

3.43 

19 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 5J 

EPA METHOD 26 J& Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions 

Florim USA 

. 

Clarksville, TN I 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Exhaust AlA MONITORING, INC. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg 

Date: 11/18/08 11/18/08 11118/08 

e Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 

Tstart Start Time 821 945 1112 

Tend End Time 921 1046 1212 

Pbar Barometric Pressw·e, in. Hg 29.88 29.88 29.88 29.88 

PC Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.0235 -0.0235 -0.0235 -0.0235 

Ps Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.856 29.856 29.856 29.856 

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, liters 120.7 120.1 120.5 120.4 

y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.949 0.949 0.949 0.949 

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 64.4 75.2 76.8 72.1 

Vsro Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 4.07 3.96 3.97 4.00 

Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.036 0.032 0.036 0.035 

PMv Percent Moisture in Stack 3.6 3.2 3.6 3.5 

MFo Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.964 0.968 0.964 0.965 

Md Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lbllb mole 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 

Ms Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 28.603 28.649 28.600 28.617 

Cp Pi tot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

APS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.513 0.520 0.508 0.514 

Ts Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 287.9 287.6 287.8 287.8 

Vs A vg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 34.5 34.9 34.1 34.5 

A Area Stack, ft2 10.202 10.202 10.202 10.202 

Qso Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 14,339 14,573 14,180 14,364 

QA Actual Gas Volmne Flow, CFM 21,116 21,359 20,886 21,120 

Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 14,876 15,053 14,716 14,882 

20 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26 

Determination of Hydrogen Chloride Emissions 

Florim USA 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Exhaust 

-Hydrogen Chloride Concentrations and Emission Rates 

md Hydrogen Chloride Catch, mg 

c Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, mg/dscm 

Ca Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 

CAw Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbslhr 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentrations and Emission Rates 

md Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 

c Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, mg/dscm 

Ca Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 

CAw Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbslhr 

5.45 

47.33 

0.021 

2.54 

0.037 

0.32 

0.00014 

0.017 

CJ 

J& AUt MONITOR!NO, INC. 

5.58 2.87 4.63 

49.71 25.55 40.86 

0.022 0.011 0.018 

2.71 1.35 2.20 

0.041 <0.020 < 0.033 

0.37 <0.18 <0.29 

0.00016 < 0.00008 < 0.00013 

0.020 < 0.009 < 0.016 

21 
SlJNIMARY OF RESULTS s02- 6.3 

EPA Iv1ETHOD 6 l'n \et lr Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 

Florim USA !11C.INO,IHC, 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet 

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg 

Date: 11118/08 11118/08 11118/08 

e Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 

Tstart Start Time 821 945 1112 

Tend End Time 921 1045 1212 

Pbar Barometric· Pressure, in. Hg 29.88 29.88 29.88 29.88 

Pa Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.441 -0.441 -0.441 -0.441 

Ps Stack Pressure, Absolute, ll1.1ig 29.439 29.439 29.439 29.439 

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 34.25 34.33 34.40 34.33 

8H Avg. Delta H, in. H20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 68.6 72.4 73.4 71.5 

Vr:;m Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 34.25 34.09 34.09 34.14 

Vc Volume of Water Collected, ml 25.7 29.4 27.9 27.7 

Vwc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 1.21 1.38 1.31 1.30 

Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.034 0.039 0.037 0.037 

PMV Percent Moisture in Stack 3.41 3.90 3.71 3.68 

Mrn Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.966 0.961 0.963 0.963 

Me Mole .. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 

Ms Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 28.625 28.571 28.592 28.596 

Cp Pi tot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

8PS A vg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.632 0.630 0.631 0.631 

Ts A vg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 324.4 324.6 337.6 328.9 

Vs Avg. Stack Velocity, ftlsec 43.8 43.7 44.1 43.9 

A Area Stack, ft2 8.296 8.296 8.296 8.296 

22 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS EJ 

EPAMETHOD6 J& Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 

Florim USA .a MONIIOIINO,INt. Clarksville, 1N 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet 

Qso Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 13,951 13,844 13,766 13,854 

QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 21,808 21,758 21,950 21,839 

Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 14,444 14,406 14,297 14,382 

Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations And Emission Rates 

N Normality of Barium Perchlorate, g-eq./liter 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 

Ysoln Volume of Sample Solution, ml 400.0 400.0 400.0 400.0 

Vt Volume of Titrant Used in Sample, ml 5.42 5.49 2.94 4.61 

vtb Volume of Titrant Used in Blank, m1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Va Volume of Sample Aliquot Titrated, ml 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 

CS02 Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, lbs/dscf 9.18E-06 9.34E-06 5.01E-06 7.84E-06 

CAw Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate, lbslhr 7.68 7.76 4.14 6.53 

23 
SUM1v.IARY OF RESULTS 

EPAMETHOD6 

Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 

Florim USA 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet 

Example Calculati.ons Run 1 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

P S = P bar + P g = 

Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

v 17.647 * VM * (Pbllt + 6H I 13.6) 'tirO = ____________________________________ .... ____________ = 

TM +460 

Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 

Vwc = 0.04709 * Vc = 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

Vwc 

Bws = --------------------------------- = 

Ysm+Vwc 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

100 * Vwc 

PMv = -----------------------·-· .. = 

Vsm + Vwc 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

100- PMV 

MFo = ----·----------------.. -= 

100 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

Md = 0.44 * %C02 + 0.32 * %02+ 0.28 * (100- %C02- %02) = 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 

Ms = Md * (1 - Bws) + 18.0 * Bwa = 

Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

(T5+ 460) 

Vs = 85.49 * CP * 6PS * SQRT ------------........................ = 

(Ps * MJ 

29.439 

34.2 

1.21 

0.034 

3.4 

0.966 

29.0 

28.625 

43.8 

24 
SUNfMA.RY OF RESULTS 

EPAMETHOD6 

Detennination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 

Florim USA 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet 

Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 

1058.82 * Vs *A* Ps * (1 - Bws) 

Qso= -------------------------------------------------- = 

Ts + 460 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

QA = v s * A * 60 = 

Gas Volwne Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

Qsw = Qso* [11(1-Bws)] = 

Area ofNozzle, ft2 

An= ((Dn /2)2 * 3.14159)/144 = 

Percent Isokinetic 

0.0945 * (Ts +460) * Vsm 

I :: ----------------------------------------------- = 

9 * V s * P s * ( 1 " Bws) * An 

Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, lbs/dscf 

N(Vt- Vtb) * (VsolnNa) 

cso2 = 7 .061E-05 *---------------------------- = 

Vsm 

Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

CAw = cso2 * 60 * QSd = 

Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

13,951 

21,808 

14,444 

0.00034 

101.2 

9.18E-06 

7.68 

25 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS S02- EJ 

EPAMETHOD6 ottrrt-e+- J& Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 

Florim USA Am MOHifGlWQ, INC. 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No.1 Baghouse Exhaust 

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg 

Date: 11/18/08 11/18/08 11/18/08 

9 Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 

Tstart Start Time 821 945 1112 

Tend End Time 921 1045 1212 

Pbar Barometric ·Pressure, in. Hg 29.88 29.88 29.88 29.88 

ps Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.024 -0.024 -0.024 -0.024 

Ps Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.856 29.856 29.856 29.856 

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, qu, ft. 43.49 44.33 44.87 44.23 

AH A vg. Delta H, ~· H20 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 67.3 77.8 81.6 75.6 

Vsm Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 43.67 43.64 43.87 43.73 

Vc Volume of Water Collected, ml 34.7 30.5 35.2 33.5 

Vwc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 1.63 1.44 1.66 1.58 

Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.036 0.032 0.036 0.035 

PMV Percent Moisture in Stack 3.61 3.19 3.64 3.48 

MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.964 0.968 0.964 0.965 

Md Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 

Ms Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 28.603 28.650 28.599 28.617 

Cp Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 . 0.84 0.84 

ilPS A vg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.513 0.520 0.508 0.514 

Ts Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 287.9 287.6 287.8 287.8 

Vs Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 34.5 34.9 34.1 34.5 

A Area Stack, ft2 10.202 10.202 10.202 10.202 

26 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS CJ 

EPAMETHOD6 a& Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 

Florim USA loll MOMfOIINO,IMC. 

Clarksville, TN 

Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Exhaust 

Qso Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 14,339 14,573 14,180 14,364 

QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 21,116 21,359 20,886 21,120 

Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 14,876 15,053 14,716 14,881 

Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations And Emission Rates 

N Normality of Barium Perchlorate, g-eq.lliter 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 

Vsoln Volume of Sample Solution, m1 400.0 400.0 400.0 400.0 

Vt Volwne of Titrant Used in Sample, ml 5.56 5.94 3.72 5.07 

Vtb Volume of Titrant Used in Blank, ml 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Va Volume of Sample Aliquot Titrated, ml 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 

cso2 Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, lbs/dscf 7.39E-06 7.90E-06 4.92E-06 6.74E-06 

CAw Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate, lbs/br 6.36 6.91 4.18 5.82 

27 
APPENDIX2 

FIELD DATA SHEETS 

28 
EPAMethodl 

Determ~nation of Sampling Points 

Client _F..;..;lo..;..;rim;;.-;... ____________ _ 

Sampling Location .;;;B~agh=o.;;;;us;;.;;.e..;;;Inl;;:;e.;.;;t ______ _ 

City Clarksville, 1N 

Date 

Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE) 

2 X Length X Width 

Length+ Width 

Stack Area 

Traverse Points - Percentage of Stack ID 

Rectangular Stacks 

' : .. :• 2 3 4 s 

25 16.7 12.5 10 

2 75 50 37.5 30 ,·· ... ·~' . 3 .. 83.3 62.5 50 _, .. .. 

4 ....... .. 87.5 70 : ' : ~ 

.. . . , . 

5 .-;:~,. .··::· .. 90 

6 ··~~ ~ l : ·:"~: ; •• :::': .. : • I 

.:~ .·~ .~~:·: _: ': ~~ff;·:~~ ... ,~·-~ 

Circular Stacks 

4 6 8 10 

6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 

2 25 14.6 10.5 8.2 

3 75 29.6 19.4 14.6 

4 93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 

5 85.4 67.7 34.2 

6 80.6 65.8 

7 89.5 77.4 

8 96.8 85.4 

9 •':·:··.r .. , ·. ··.. t:•-.· 91.8 

97.4 

:····,.· ·.·.'='·· 

10 ·.!::"._·· .. ·.- ... 

11 .. ... .:.-: ~ ''" . •. 

12 

6 

8.3 

25 

41.7 

58.3 

75 

91.7 

12 

2.1 

6.7 

11.8 

17.7 

25 

35.6 

64.4 

75 

82.3 

88.2 

93.3 

97.9 

Samplin2 Location Dimensions 

vJS:D 

/.a.D 

Far Wall to Outside of Port 

Nipple Length 

Depth of Duct 

Width (Rectangular Duct) 

Distance to Ports From Nearest Disturbance 

A B I r'-f II 11::1/Q 11 I Dislance, inches 

. . . No. Diameters 

Hon~6"'4-"'-l ~vt. f 

A 

8 

Location of Sampline Points 

Point % of Stack ID Inches From Nipple Inches From 

Stack ID inches Inside Wall Length Outside ofPort 

2 

3 

4 .. ·.--.·· 3::t-3 ''I ·~~ .. ~~, I ~ fi • 5'11 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 r· •. 

...... f ~ ' 

10 .. , ... , . 

~ ~-. ~~;. ,:.~ .. ·. 

11 

12 

29 
G:J 

Ji, 

.. -- EPA Method 2 - Field Data Sheet 

Client (, &> r: ~ Sampling Location ~4~ h tJ,A~ Run Date Jl /f1/~1J. __ 

City,State C)~~)lAi/Jf , rrJ 

OAillttJ Operators -.~.o:o:/f~;r....=;,C/_,_,_Jlf~t--------­ Time JU.uO 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg .....:!..~'1..:..·---=-::·.J=--------­ Static Pressure, in. H10 _--.:..!-IP~· :;,~-------

Pitot Tube I.D. No. 0'( 1 n \d 

Pitot Tube Leak Che_ck;;;.....;;;..+~'5':--·;;...0---.-~,~t-. /r----

Traverse 

Point 

Number 

' . '· 

. Ve1oclty Head tap Inches . H10 . 

Field Data 

StOck ·~i ~·· • 

. Temperatiire °F : < "~-: . 

l •• • 

.. :. . . - ·.. .. .. . . •. . . : ~ .:·:·, ,. ' 

~p. at 0° Re~ercaee ' .·.. . . . ' Angle '\Yhlc~ Yields aN~ ~p -.:: ' 

Stack Temperature, Dry, °F (A)-----

Difference (A-B)---------

Comments 

V,64 o.u; t;' 

o.o'7 tJr(}J 4 

f),j)"J tJ I c.t 2.. 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

iJ 6 D 1),0~ b '2-

0 n/1. o~o-z. (p 

Stack Temperature, Wet op (B)------

Preliminary Percent Moisture _____ _ 

I.R 

0 

?J 

(\ 

0 

i) 

0 

1 

30 
EPA Method 2-Field Data Sheet 

Client Florim City, State Clarksyille. TN 

Sampling Location~B~agh~o=us~e~In=let~------- ProjectNwnber ...¥0~8-~10~0 -------

Run Date 1{ / i t' I \> $ Operators 4Qb I Jl11 

Pitot Tube I.D. No. D ~ · t 1 \o Leak Check+ <-t I C{ • 7 /2. 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Time (24-Hour Clock) Q_~t-5" oq'1o 1/J~ 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg ~CJ~ ~4, ~~· l)~ '2 q,~]S 

Static Pressure, H20 -[p,'() -f.o.a -/P.ia 

Stack Temp., Dry, op J.Jc/-1 .AAI+ UA 

Stack Temp., Wet, op 1 I I 

Moisture,% ~ j/ Jl 

4. J 

PJ 1 

\.( 

o.?to f 

o, «to) 1'1)(,~. 

31 
Field Data Slteet- EPA Method 6 -sulfur Dioxide 

Client _Florim. ____________________ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, TN. _________________ _ 

Sampling Location Baghouse Inlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg :Jq · Z' :( Sample ID No. q; I Dt) ... ~ 

Static Press., In. H,O -In .D y = I. DD 3 Obse er (f. v r Jf J lK.-., ~\IS H Jt~ 0 fs' , ...... Meter Box No. C...,. 5ZJ00-?> Probe No. Agency __ v-_B'_~ L __ 

Sample Box No. I Y ~ A<"~ f Probe Temp. Sett.Uig ~ :zO Start Time --.;-::;;._t... __ _ 

RunNumber _ ___.__ ___ _ 

Date H ~~~ ~ ZXr 

Operators A-:\ 0 

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre· Test () .. Ot:> 3 @ Is- In. Hg. 

Post-Test b1 b(;)l @~ln.Hg. 

End Time cR l. I 24 • Hr 

10 'LI~J 7/ i~·~ .. ';) ... (.:~:/~ J- ~ /_ e--, .J-.. ·.···.' .! ... : .• ·~ .•.• '-~-: (_Q .:> ~ , -~ 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

lmpinger 1 2 3 4 SG 

Final Weight, m~ '3D '2 S" Lo ;- l.. Jt;).) 

Initial Weight, mg ·\co I Do 1c)0 t. 00 

Net Gain, mg ·-1.-o :Z.h"' I[ )$',; 

€0 

32 
Field Data Sl1eet- EPA Met/Jod 6 -sulfur Dioxide 

Client _Florim~-------------------

City/State _Clarksville, TN ________________ _ 

Samplirig Location Baghouse Inlet 

')ct .~~~ Bar. Press., In. Hg _.I.__;_ 1-=-'V- Sample ID No. lSlou _.. 9 

Run Number _'1.. ____ _ 

Date \ill~ /0~ 

Operators It 51> , .Jlf'-

- LEAK CHECKS 

Static Press., In. H20 · -{.p " 0 

Meter Box No. C )"DDO ~ '} 

. Y = i ,OL)j Observer :f ' ~ rt1rJl~ . f > .. r tt' s AM&... .... r lr Pre-Testb.ao'( @~ln. Hg. 

-c - Probe No. Agency -(b t;' PostwTest d,()OJ @_? __ In. Hg. 

Sample Box No. ----:/.--:7~-- - Probe Temp. Setting t fi OCf'f. "J End Time J04(p 24 • Hr 0 Start Thne 

.. -~J;. _, ... }''ftiif;: =i •• 

. Vacuwri : -Temp·: ~ ·Inches · .°F 

.Hg. :.-. ~ .. i" .. :· .• 

0 

5 I 50 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 I f.oo 

45 

50 

60 ,ca,'7., "" ~~:Jf\~;:-_':··::·:~!~:: .. : ..,·;:.~;~?~;f:r?~~ ·:~'f~:J.~·:.~?·:-~~r~·. ::·:~ ·:? ... ::~ .... ~ 

· .· _, · ~ ..: -~-. · ~~, ) "' . , ~ , , . o 'l;). L.f, , :~ffl~ i:r;':K~~:. :_ . ~·'·~~- : . · -~~. :} .. 

lmpinger 

Final Weight, mg 

Initial Weight, mg 

Net Gain, mg 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

1-1 ..'l D 

1 

~00·0 

d00·D 

c;.o 

;)OO·D 

d.~~. L..{ 

--

~a..t-f 

2 3 4 SG 

33 
Field Data Sheet- EPA Method 6 -Sulfur Dioxide "I 

Client _Florim. ____________________ _ RunNumber _·) _____ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, TN _________________ _ Date __ ,....L.l/...L.r..it£.~~· ........ 1 o~S~· ---

Sampling Location Baghousc Inlet Operators A-.f) ~ 

Bar. Press., In. Hg .)"1 ' ~~ 

Static Press., In. HzO --0; · U 

Meter Box No. [ ~U;Q · ) 

Sample Box No. _l ~'1 __ _ 

Sample ID No. t{ll)) "l 0 LEAK CHECKS . . 1 ,-' 

Y= ~-t:O] Observer ~- ~f'-Ylk·J A,i{~: 1~ lS Pre-Test 0 .. ~~ ®JLin. Hg. 

-~ ..,_ (..(_ r, 1 \0 J I _ Probe No. Agency '~~., Post· Test li • "-" @~In. Hg. 

Probe Temp. Setting 2 '5 <.) Start Time \ll 2.. End Time I lt l. 24 - Hr 

Analysis of Moisture Reco-very 

34 
Field Data Slleet- EPA Met/Jod 26-Hydrogen Cillo ride & Fluoride 

Client _Florim _____________________ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, 1N __________________ _ 

Sampling Location Baghouse Inlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg ~'1 -1s~ 

Static Press., In. H30 "'-{.Q. • b 

Meter Box No. YO 51"~~ 

y_~tn- .. 1. 

Sample Box No. ~-

Sample ID No. q; l 00 .- 0 ( 

Y = I). 1(d. Observer ..::( • .. ~ ~cllt1 

Probe No. ,-, 'dl,- Agency ""iT)f..( 

Probe Temp. Setting ;? ?'D Start Time L)~1.. I 

Run Number __ __.__ ___ _ 

Date II {II( / D f( 

Operators A I~ 

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre-Test &:o/' @~In. Hg. 

Post· Test () .l•u4 @ _!i__ In. Hg. 

U ... All End Tune 24 • Hr 

:. :. -~:Gas : :~ . . '. eter · · . · 

,'·:Pump'~= 

.Vaeuum' ;-,.Imp •. · .Temp Tem,.e.crature.°F: ::.=:-~rs~-}~ '•.: op 

·; : _ve~ge .. ·>. . . 

0 o.ooo ~ .. 0 :~ 1.. ~<.t 

5 4J~ ~ !Jff' 

10 !"4 ::> ~f) 

15 (IJI .;} l.oO 

20 G,;:> ~ ~(\ 

25 ~~~ d l.oO 

30 'l..o~ :;;;) -~~ 

35 ~~ 2.. 5"'7 

40 ~Cf 2 (tO 

45 fo~ '"Z. ~~. 

so '1D .J /.o:;;J. 

55 'it, ~ G7 

60 ·- .. ·:.:J.: ·.·. '~ . . : ' .. . ·.::···.: .... ·:_;..· 

A11alysls of Moisture Recovery 

Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 

Final Volume, m1 

Initial Volume, m1 30 

Net Condensed Volume, ml 

Impinger Absorbing Solution NaOH 

Final Volume, m1 

Initial Volume, ml 15 

Net Condensed Volume, ml 

Total Condensed Volume, ml 

Percent Silica Gel Spent 

Final Weight, g 

Initial Weicltt, ~ 15 

Net Absorbed Water. 2 .• .:.• ·~'Y·: ... ': . . f-1- . 

... '.··· .. • .. ~ • r; - .. 

Total Rea2ent Collected, g 

35 
Field Data Slleet- EPA Method 26- Hydrogen Cltloride & Fluo~ide 

Client _Florim _____________________ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, TN __________________ _ 

Sampling Location Baghouse Inlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg ~ 4 · ~~ Sample ID No. 1i l Vu -u1 

Static Press., In. H20 ... b i\) y r:: O~qG"tobserver J, f7r~lf.oi!,, 

Meter Box No. \) Q l;'i" .. 'l, 

Sample Box No. VO 71 -''t 

Probe No. _____ _ 

Probe Temp. Setting 11{) 

Agency 1\)i?Jl 

Start Time 0 1'-t '[" 

. Dry ·aa.s. . . . .. _Sam_ple · .. 

Cl k M t ., . ,Flow Rate; . .. . oc . . e er ·. . = ~ ,LPM . • .. Time · . LiterS ·:, · -~;· ; · : · · · •· • I• '·•,. 

-:-.::·. · .. _ .., ,• '•. ..,;!. 

0 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

so 

55 

60 .. \ 

. ' '•'i ··.:: ·;;-. ·'l3.D 

A11alysis of Moisture Recovery 

Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 

1fihal Volume, ml 

Initial~ume, ml 30 

Net Condeime.d Volume_, ml 

ImJ>inger Absorb'iBg Solution NaOH 

Final Volume, ml ~ ...... 

Initial Volume, m1 ""'. 15 

Net Condensed Volume, ml ... .............. 

Total Condensed Volume, m1 ............... 

15 

Run Number 'l 

------- Date It ( r ~ i D $ 

Operators A r) .. :Jm. 

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre-Test (}.oOf..e @_L)__In. Hg. 

Post· Test D · VO"l. @ _j_ In. Hg. 

End Time (0 L£ (a 24- Hr 

l..4 Lf 

36 
Field Data Slzeet- EPA Method 26- Hydrogel! Chloride & Fluoride 

Client _Florim ____________________ ~ 

City/State _Clarksville, 1N. _________________ _ 

Sampling Location Bagbouse Inlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg ;,>,.~,. 't)~ Sample ID No. 4) 1 t)l) / t}J 

Static Press., In. H20 ...... 6 r \) Y= O.qfz.. Observer J. ~(~{p:t 

Meter Box No. 

Sample Box No. 

vu 't~"1. Probe No. Agency I'll~ c_ 

\Jv'?T"1. Probe Temp. Setting 2.5"0 Start Time /tlL. 

·_·,.: ·{ ... · ... . : .. ;:. · ·-: .. _·tiry;'oa~·: ...... · ·. ~· · .S~_ple :_.:.;. ·: nr.Y oas· · ;: ~-..·::Pump 

:. Cioclc : ·.·,~· Meter : · . Fl~wRa~;·;. , 'Meter · · ··vacuum ".'Tiine.· :_ ::·· Liters:·:-:- ,. ~M Temperatme°F · Inches 

.;·<:: ·.: ·· .. ~:·.: .... · .. ·,~·:::'./;~ .-·.: ·. Averag~ :'-·_.1-Jg::-·. 

0 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 : ..... ~ .. \' ,:.r~:;~·;·,..~. • 

. ·, ·.~:::;;-~~:' ~:_ ~-~:·:. 

(s,t '- · .... ! ·.·. ·• .'-:;''·:· 

10 ,o , :::. ·'·· .•. ·.·~ '1 l ·~ 

'7-:::} ~ 

'l·:L ~ 

t-}::J. 0} 

'"12 :;l.. 

'I~ ~ 

'1 '3 ·d.. 

·'1Y ~ 

Cf{.OL.f '1_S' ;t. 

"1tp 2 

ltD.tt r')/..P ~ 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 

Final VolUBl.e, ml 

Initial Voiume; .. mi 30 

Net Condensed V OllUlle, ml 

Impinger Absorbing §btution NaOH 

Final Volume, ml "' Initial Volume, ml "' IS 

Net Condensed Volume, m1 I'......~ 

Total Condensed Volume, ml 

Percent Silica Gel S!!_ent 

Final W'eiWl_t, g 

Initial Weight:g .... , 15 

Net Absorbed Water, g ............. 

Total Reagent Collected, g ..... ....___ 

Run Number _7 _____ _ 

Date I tl tt lo'l> 

Operators /hr) t \:D 

LEAl{ CHECKS 

Pre-Test &.Odj @~In. Hg. 

Post· Test rJ .'0 i @ lb_ In. Hg. 

End Time I Z )1 24 • Hr 

··Imp·:··:· 

Temp · ·. op. :, :. .' ~:. 

37 
EPA Method 1 

Determination of Sampling Points 

Client ..:.F.:;:1o;.:,:rim::::::... ____________ _ 

Sampling Location -=B~agh~Z:.:.;;o.;;;;::us;.;.e..;;:O;.;;u:=.tle;;.;;t ______ _ 

City Clarksville, 1N 

Date hJflfcfb 

Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE) 

2 X Length X Width 

DE::= 

Length+ Width 

Traverse Points - Percentae:e of Stack ID 

Rectan2ular Stacks .. ·. 

2 3 4 5 

25. 16.7 12.5 10 

2 75 50 37.5 30 

3 83.3 62.5 50 ..... 

4 .. 87.5 70 

5 -... 

.90 .. . . '·:. '. .· .. 

6 . . ~-."':. . · .. : .. ,''' 

. ~ ' ·. . ,_,,::."-:'·.··· 

Circular Stacks 

4 6 8 10 

6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 

2 25 14.6 10.5 8.2 

3 75 29.6 19.4 14.6 

4 93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 

5 85.4 67.7 34.2 

6 95.6 80.6 65.8 

7 ;~· ·c.;. .. .. .. .. 89.5 77.4 

8 

·: .. •' 96.8 85.4 

:<· ·. :.:.:. 9 ···-·'"' 0 91.8 ' ~ . .":_ .. , .. 

10 l, '· 97.4 

: ~ . -.; . 

. .':.:.;.'·. . ' 

11 •, 

12 . ·, .,· 

6 

8.3 

25 

41.7 

58;3 

75 

91.7 

12 

2.1 

6.7 

11.8 

17.7 

25 

35.6 

64.4 

75 

82.3 

88.2 

93.3 

97.9 

Samplinl! Location Dimensions 

'1'1 If Far Wall to Outside of Port 

') ;") .J" Nipple Length 

'-! ~ tl.!) Depth of Duct 

Width (Rectangular Duct) 

Distance to Ports From Nearest Disturbance 

Point 

2 

3 

4 

s 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

Distance, inches 

No. Diameters 

T~ )'tb ~ A 

j_ 

1 'l>r l,. 8 

1 

Location of Sampling Points 

% of Stack ID Inches From Nipple Inches From 

Stack ID inches Inside Wall 

.,. .. 

Length 

.. · _;· -":~· ... 

·:::. 

~ ; 0 l ... 

~· ··:. !· .~.! 

·~~r :.;;:, •.<: ;'. , ~ • l··· ... • 

r.,:.. j 

Outside ofPort 

38 
EPA Method 2 -Field Data Sheet 

Client () br,'JVJ City. State CJ)ifJ~> V' ,J e. nJ 

Sampling Location tJ 11 h cV,f2 t-il/1 av~1 Operators ~~B...:;~~C...,_. --U~Iti""-'C,< ______ _ 

Run Date tt( 1 '2 l 0 q Time __,;l:....:f:..."'.JL..il ,l:::C;,__~----=~------

Barometric Pressure. in. Hg ?t "l ~ '!{If Pitot Tube I.D. No. ---~~:{);,:~~-·...;.,jtl~f""""!)~--~--- Static Pressure, in. H20 - D 1 ?J 'V Pitot Tube Leak Check+ i"' .. ), "!-, f 

Field Data 

.... , 0 o )o o '" ·~ "I 'I t.: ~'w •"~ • • o 

Traverse· 

. Pomc ·. Number. 

. Vei'o~~~ ·~end ~p ~Debes · ... :.: .. : B1~ '· ·: --t•. ·, 

.. .· stack · : .: . rc~perafure. Off l , : . . . . · • ·. · ~ ~C:loni~ .~owp~~~~~Pef:oli , 

. ·~ ...... :::·~. :: :':· ... ;·.,· .:.; .. J/i· .. c.··:: .... ~·~· .. ; ~ _·. : 

! • 4 ·, .,· 

Averages 

Stack Temperature, Dry, °F (A)-----

D~eren~(A-B) ________ __ 

i' •,.;-·;,.·• I . •, .. <Aogie\vblch Yields a Niill.~P ·: •••• ! 

Ap~ .a~ 0° Reference ... 

{), D~ () .. £1/ ~~ 

O·CH (} 10? '1 

t) I ()l/ &cOl, ~ 

(), Dt. v . ., 

? 

0 0 0 o~ot.J 010) f oro') 0 I D.) 7 

o.o'-1 0· t)f" G 

. ' . : ... ~; 

Stack Temperature, Wet Of (B)------

Preliminary Percent Moisture------

(p 

? 

2 

0 

u 

f..J 

~ 

.q, 

Comm~u------------------------------------

39 
EPA Metltod 2- Field Data Slteet 

Client Florim City, State Clarksville. TN 

Sampling Location ...t:B=a~gh~ou~se~O::r.:u=tl~et _________ Project Number .........,08c...-l"-Z'O~O --------

Run Date I { /1 CO J 0$ Operators BAJ6, J1t. 

Pitot Tube I.D. No. D q ll S] Leak Check+ j' 1 0 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Time (24-Hour Clock) ~\S" '1'50 t\l) 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 'l. "'\ .'6"6 '2..0, .f6~ 'l.~ ~'6 

Static Pressure, H20 

Stack Te.a-np., Dry, °F 

Stack Temp., Wet, Of 

Moisture,% 

T~avcrsc . 

Polot 

~timb~r 

A-) 

1. 

~ I 

-~ 

-~ 

Averages 

: Vcloc:ltj 

Hca~~P .. , . Inc:heS. HaO . 

.. )\ 

.'1 c 

~) .. 

. t.Cr, 

.1~1 

-. ~)_ ·-.~~ -.~)_ 

: · ·- , "' '• ., j' t.: ;·:: :; ' , · - ,···.,• • ., ·· • l· '• s.'l• .. ·r'- 1 •• •• •i •· , . . , •· •· .,;"1""• ·•'. - ·,, '1. •• .... • • . ,.._ ,· .• 

. . ~ra~k··. · ·· V:eloc:i~. ·.: .... ·.::'.sfoc~:'~:···;;· :· ... ~.~vc!o~i·ty:' ::::-~:::·s~·~:.~··~·:;·' 'vei~citf: .. , ·~" ':·~st~d<.:·.; 

Temperature . . . Hea~ ap. ·. . ~(~e~pe~~~e.: ~ )::: l~c~:~ Ap I Temperature :li~ci Ap :··': : 1;~pe.,8tu;e · · °F ·. ·:· · · iaic:h·es.J:IaO 1.>. ·.:.::.~: . .'·::· .. - . .Inche~ H20 .•, \:. :~i~:~.~F-. ':· ,:>: I~.c~e;:·HaO.'; · / ··.:·op·.:·\· ~ .. 

• 1( 

'l~l 

.J-1 

40 
Field Data Slteet- EPA Metllod 6 -,Sulfur Dioxide 

Client _Florim. ____________________ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, TN _________________ _ 

Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet 

Bar. Press., ln. Hg Jet. Y.[ 

Static Press., In. H20 - •} ~ 

Meter Box No. G· '}OQ,) .. \ 

Sample Box No. ___._\l.,.__ __ 

0 

s 

10 

IS 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

Im~inger 

Sample ID No. ~ i l>O .- I/ 

Y = 0 'fCtC:f Observer .J, f1 (~l'i A" \.7o').... 

Probe No. --.,----

Probe Temp. Setting )..C)b 

Agency _1"--¥-P.Io..Lh..;;;;..L __ 

Start Time _fs'::..~=-:...1 __ _ 

_SwnpJe ~:' · '.. ~. ·· · · ·· Flow Rate~.· . DiY Oas · · · ·:: Pump . l:iPM ~ i. •. Meter:.: 0 Vacuum 

1'\ "·:·.:~. ~- .Temp~~~ F: .. Inohes ~- _::· .:. ~. · Average·.... · :.Hg··. 

· Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

1 2 3 

Final Weight, mg "7'0 ,-a-o 100 

Initial Weight mg I, 0 \00 ~[)0 

NetGain,mg ... ~'-) Jo Q~ 

Run Number -------

Operators G.Lu ~. Q'l.n, 

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre-Test 0 ,oo'l @_£_In. Hg. 

Post-Test '"OOf @jy_ln,Hg. 

End Time lJ ),\ 24 • Hr 

4 

~j,.·:· .Temp .op ··.·. 

SG 

1. ,'i,:'J 

~ou 

1~.? 

41 
Field Data Sheet- EPA Method 6 -sulfur Dioxide 

Client _Florim. _____________________ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, TN __________________ _ 

Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg ___ 

~frq'] _ Sample ID No._..;......;:..::....._.....;.....;~ ~lo0-77.. 

Static Press., In. H20 - 0' l~ 

Meter Box No. ( • ~\\Q~- \ 

Sample Box No. --L:\'l:;;....._ __ 

Y= (),'IQL{ Observer 6. hr~~ ~)It 'i.lt>").. 

Probe No. Agency T~ [L 

Probe Temp. Setting 2 'S' D Start Time '\ &..1 t;;' 

· •• ! 

Clock · Time 

0 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

so 

55 

60 

Impinger 

Final Weight, mg 

Initial Weight, m2 

NetGain,mg 

A11a/ysis of Moisture Recovery 

1 2 3 

~~b 1li'V~-H-v tOO 

\91'\ 

\ "'" ·\00 

-~ ~'f) 't) 

RunNwnber _1 _____ _ 

Date ""'"'"' .. D ~ Operators J A(,, (;Lv(_ 

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre-Test (0. ol):l- @ _jQ_ In. Hg. 

Post· Test b 'Du l @ _ff_ In. Hg. 

End Time l 0 4 ~ 24 - Hr 

4 SG 

')lo.<" 

?o1J 

'l-1>.~ 

42 
Field Data Slleet- EPA Metl1od 6 -8uifur Dioxide ;.l't.-t.. 

Client _Florim:...----------------------

City/State _Clarksville, TM-------------------

Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg 2. 6f "'ll!J SampleiDNo. ~ lov "'} :7 

Static Press., In. H20 _j '7 'L Y = o. '\'\"{ Observer \L br<klf (J...j 

Meter Box No. t.-£~· \ Probe No. ------ Agency 'TIJ e L 

Sample Box No.__._\)===---- Probe Temp. Setting l 5\:) Start Time ____,\...1.&\J..c)..;:.__ __ 

·. . ' 

·~ . ci~·ck• :. 

Tune· · 

· .. ,:,• >'· . 

0 

5 'i ..::, ~ •• <./ _, .~~: l ·, 

10 ~,rl, 4). ,· ... ~ .. ·:·· 

.... :·· .. 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

Impinger 1 2 3 

Final Weight, mg 7('\ J1D lee; 

Initial Weight, rng 1(.)\) lou 1l)~ 

NetGain,mg --ou C..\ f) ~ .... --

Rtm Nwnber t/T'Dftfl 3 

Date \1 -Jif ...£> fl 

Operators .J A L 1 E: W'=-

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre-Test (') I oDZ. @ lk_ In. Hg. 

Post-Test @ __ In. Hg. 

End Time t )... \').. 24 - Hr 

4 SG 

2;1-(,~11,. 

'2.-00 

d.D1 ~ 

('Jr.V 

··-----

43 
Field Data Slteet- EPA Method 26- Hydrogen Clzloride & Fluoride 

Client _Florim ______________________ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, 1N __________________ _ 

Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg l'"~~ Sample ID No. 4to0"'1 

Static Press., In. }hO .. 1')....- y = DPll.\~ Observer ,.J. /lrGt:U.c·"f 

Meter Box No. 'J. a; l ~ \ Probe No. Agency --n~c. 

Sample Box No. \1 L17 r-\ Probe Temp. Setting ');;OJ Start Time -g).~ 

Run Number-------

Date I\-\~'"'-'~ 

Operators ,I A f... 1 (;tv£.-

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre-Test ~ .~ l @_l (p_Jn. Hg. 

Post· Test D · DD ~ @ l!:L_ In. Hg. 

Erid Time <?t .\..\ 24 • Hr 

D~';f '~~~~~·~i~l~i ~:~i --~~-. : 

Clock 

Tqn:~,· 

0 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25. 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 i)..C,t!;M ... '. :·~ .. ·:'' 

.. 17/J .(p~ 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 

Final ~um.e_, m1 

Initial Vo~e, ml 30 

Net Condens~olume, ml 

Impinger Absorbin)'-S.Qlution NaOH 

Final Volume, ml ~ Initial Volume, ml ~15 

Net Condensed Volume, ml ' Total Condensed Volume, ml 

44 
Field Data Slleet- EPA Method 26- Hydrogen C/zlorlde & Fluoride 

Client _Florim ______________________ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, TN __________________ _ 

Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg '1~ .~~ Sample ID No. C£ I·DQ .... 5 

Static Press., In. H20 .... 3 1.. 8A~~ A L Y = . 5:1 Observer rJ, (il (P,a&.-e'J 

Meter Box No. V C6± ~\ Probe No. ------

Sample Box No. ~ ·vo"Jt '' I Probe Temp. Setting .. J_ SC> 

D l-0 

:/,~:2::~Y~t. :.f:·, ' 

/1') .. 04 

lot. l~ :;:iL.~~r: e~~·:(;·~. 

'1Clt.)1 ;~;~~~;;~:·?:',.\:.; ~~>' 

)\.r;l ; :;j:f;L;{~; · .:, .. ·.::.: .' .. ::. 

Agency r@ £C.. 

Start Time . ~ ..._. ~ 

I \ 

1'1 

, I 

1:!> 

1-l.{ 

~ 

) 

.., 

") 

1... 

Run Number _2 ______ _ 

Date \'\-\$ ·o( 

Operators .l \\[... 1 C"'-L. 

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre· Test X>;O I @LIn. Hg. 

Post-Test ' 1~· 0 \ @ __ lO In. Hg. 

End Time t~t~} 24- Hr 

2s ~'\, '"Q). -.~5~~i~?~\ .:.~.~ :\. '1 ')' '2 ~s 

\riC> .tGI ~~,·:~: c:.~ :~··.::\:i~~;; tlo 2 

A11alysis of Moisture Recovery 

Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 

Final Volume, ml 

Initial Volume, m1 30 

Net Condensed Volume, ml 

Impinger Absorbing Solution NaOH 

Final Volume, ml 

Initial Volume, mi 15 

Net Condensed Volume, ml 

Total Condensed Volume, mi 

Percent Silica Gel Spent 

Final Weight,_g 

Initial Weight, g 15 

Net Absorbed Water g .. :·t:.· . . . . . .. ... : .. . .. Total Reagent Collected, g 

45 
Field Data Sheet- EPA Metltod 26-Hydroge11 Cillo ride & Fluoride 

Client _FJorim ______________________ _ 

City/State _Clarksville, TN __________________ _ 

Sampling Location Baghouse Outlet 

Bar. Press., In. Hg 1'1 , %f> 

Static Press., In. rhO -u. }1 

MeterBoxNo.~+ ~, 

Sample Box No. \JL>1 r...- I 

Clock 

Time 

0 

5 

10 

15 

20 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

so 

55 

60 

Sample ID No. ~ ~ DU - lp 

y = OPtY.O,· Observer J. Br ~;.,M kY 

Probe No. ___,; ____ _ Agency --:..T...Jo.oO'-!oG~L-~--

Probe Temp. Setting '1 Sb Start Time L\ DOvU.O 

t0.o1. 

-l(\, \ 

"')_({(50 

~~ .l-t,b 

50. l'"> 

(i,O. '') ·.!' ..... , '.·' • :~" 

,: .. :~ .i,:;>:: >: ;,. ·:; . . . 

/o"~"" 

'60. S) 

90 .. ~~ 

tOO c:;).... 

UD, LL1 

\'l-D .~)-

: /:~\:\t~tf?. ':u;,~ 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

Impinger Absorbing Solution H2S04 

Final Volume, ml . 

Initial Volume, ml 30 

Net Condensed Volume, ml 

Impinger Absorbing Solution NaOH 

Final Volume, ml 

Initial Volume, ml 15 

Net Condensed Volume, ml 

Total Condensed Volume, ml 

Percent Silica Gel Spent 

Final Weight, g 

Initial Weight, g 15 

Net Absorbed Water, g :'- .. r.· ... . . . ·-... ·- . . .. -. 

.. i ........... · . 

Total Reagent Collected, g 

Run Number _).::::.,_ ____ _ 

Date 1-\- \'6-~55 

Operators J t\ L J r.;: lvL 

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre-Test~ b .. D I @__IS_ ln. Hg. 

Post-Test 'j· [~I @-=::?.__In. Hg. 

End Time __ I _:~ ...:..l.....;;;t..;_. __ 24 • Hr 

46 
APPENDI.X3 

LABORATORY DATA 

47 
EPA Method 6 Analysis - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide 

Laboratory Data Sheet 

Client: Florim USA Project Number: 

City/State: Clarksville. TN Sample Dates: 

Sampling Location: Kiln 1 Analyst: PRJ 

Volume & Normality of Standard Sulfuric Acid Solution: 

Volume & Normality of Barium Perchlorate Titrant: 1.) 

2.) 

Average Volume & Normality: 

Analytical Data 

08-100 

11/18/08 

Date: 

5.00 ml 

4.87 m1 

4.86 m1 

4.87 ml 

11/24/08 

0.0100 N 

0.0103 N 

0.0103 N 

0.0103 N 

Total Sample Volume of Titrant Vt, ml 

Sample Sample Sample Aliquot 1st. 

Number Identification Vol. Vsoln Vol. Va Titration 

8100-08 Inlet-Run 1 400 20.0 21.32 

8100-08 Inlet-Run 1 400 5.0 5.43 

8100-09 Inlet-Run2 400 5.0 5.41 

8100-10 Inlet-Run 3 400 5.0 2.93 

8100-11 Outlet-Run 1 400 20.0 21.42 

8100-11 Outlet-Run 1 400 5.0 5.57 

8100-12 Outlet-Run 2 400 5.0 5.93 

8100-13 Outlet-Run 3 400 5.0 3.73 

8100-14 BlankDI 400 20.0 <0.02 

8780 Audit Series C 100 20.0 30.00 

8780 Audit Series C 100 5.0 7.49 

8100-15 QCID 0592 100 20.0 8.45 

QC Sample True Values 

Sample No. True Value 

8100-15 .660.0 

Obtained Value 

660.3 mg/dcsm 

Percent Recovery 

100.1 % 

2nd Average 

Titration Volume 

21.30 21.31 

5.40 5.42 

5.50 5.49 

2.95 2.94 

21.45 21.44 

5.55 5.56 

5.95 5.94 

3.70 3.72 

<0.02 <0.02 

30.00 30.00 

7.48 7.49 

8.40 8.43 

Percent Difference 

0.1% 

Notes: The volume for the blank must be the same as that of the sample aliquot. 

The absolute value for the 1st and 2nd titration must be equal to ~r less than 0.2 ml. 

48 
~ f 

63 -- --.. • - [ - .6:3-- ~~-~ I CHAIN OF CUST

II ·~ • • .... .A..IR. - • ·-- -- - • ...,...c_ 

r. . ~J. Flo rim USA II • lAM ,.,..T_ .L of ..... . 

~~- , .. ,............... ( ~City State: Clar· .•• TN ln .. :. ·•N no 1nn , RO)Ylll~ 1• a UJ ... '-&. 0. 7 

-- ---

r. Connie James :;-u• '":.~.,s; Order: 

:.;<:i': ::; . . . • .. . . • ''1. _.;;.. '. • ' ,,-' ..• 1- ·.; - s~~ple_iD: :_· _.·~·j}ate .- :· .,., . • :T"· ... ·,

. :: . .:. ·: ,. : ·. ·-. · ~-Sample....,~ ... •p&.auaa ·' .. ·- : .. . . '· and 

1.... Inlet Run 1 8100- 8 11/18/2008 13% H202 + DiH20 rinse 

Run2 8!00- .2 11/1Rn.OOR 13% H202 + DiH20 rinse 

Run3 81_!)0- 10 11/1Rll00& l~o/()_H202 + DiH20 rinse 

,..., ~•~ ~~ .1. Run 1 8100- 11 11/}RnOOR 13% 1-1202 + DiH20 rinse 

Run2 81_0Q:_ 12 11~!~@0! llli~02 + Di~O __rins~ R\1!13 8100- 13 1 t/18/2008 13% H202 + DiH20 rinse 

Blank _8!00- 14 !]./!_!/2QQ_8 l~o/ili202 + DiH20 rinse 

Audit 8100- 15 11118/2008 EPA Sample No. 8780 

Relinquished By: Dateffime Received By: Dateffime 

Relinquished By: Dateffime Received By: Date/Time 

,.. . !. .:I for' ... .Y By: D_!te/fime Aru.,lu'7D for the _ _r_n !. rj J. S02 -~· .. ~~---r L\A ~ ~ " ~/vt6 o<rw '-.......~ 
Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc. 

9548-D Mt. Holly Huntersville Rd. 

Huntersville, NC 28078 

Project No: 08-100 

Hydrogen Chloride 

and 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

EPA Method 26A 

Analytical Report 

11696 

Element One, Inc. 

5022-C Wrightsville Av., Wilmington. NC 28403 

910-793-0128 FAX: 910-792-6853 e11ab@e11ab.com 

50 
The following data for Analytical Report 11696 

has been reviewed for completeness, accuracy, 

adherence to method protocol, 

and compliance with quality assurance guidelines. 

Review by: 

Renee Chek, Chemist 

D.ecember 4, 2008 

Report Reviewed and Finalized By: 

Ken 

if!~ Smith, Laboratory Director 

December 4, 2008 

e£en1en.tOne 

51 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

ehen1:ent0ne 

52 
Element 

HCI 

HF 

Summary of Analysis 

Summary of Method 26A Analysis 

Baghouse Inlet R1 

e11696-1 

Total mg 

7.59 

4.17 

Baghouse Inlet R2 

e11696-2 

Total mg 

7·.67 

4.40 

Bag house Exhaust R 1 Baghouse Exhaust R2 

e11696-4 

Element Total mg 

-------·----·· -··-··------- HCI 5.45 

HF 0.037 

e11696-5 

Total mg 

···-------

5.58 

0.041 

Reagent Blank 

e11696-7 

Element Total mg 

HCI 0.076 

HF <0.02 

eleE-r&entOne .· .... •' ·- .. ' 

Baghouse Inlet R3 

e11696-3 

Total mg 

4.36 

2.46 

Baghouse Exhaust R3 

e11696-6 

Tatar mg 

--------

2.87 

<0.02 

~ '··, r· ..: .. .. :·.·:. • 

53 
ANALYTICAL NARRATIVE 

54 
Element One Analytical Narrative 

Client: Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc. Element One #: 11696 

Client ID: Florim USA Analyst: RLC 

Method: M26A Dates Received: 11/20/08 

Analytes: HCI & HF Dates Analyzed: 12/03-04/08 

Summary of Analysis 

The samples were prepared and analyzed according to Method 26A protocol. 

The samples were analyzed for chloride on a Metrohm 761/788 ion 

chromatograph system. 

Detection Limits 

The Metrohm reporting limit was 0.1 J.IQ/mL for chloride and fluoride. 

Analysis QAJQC 

Duplicate analyses relative percent difference (RPD) and spike recovery data are 

summarized in the Quality Control section. All QNQC data was within the 

criteria of the method. 

Additional Comments 

The reported results have not been corrected for any blank values or spike 

recovery values. 

ef en1:en·\'One 

.. . .. ~ 

-

55 
QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY 

56 
Summary of Quality Control Data 

Summary of Method 26A Duplicate Analysis RPD 

Baghouse I-R1 Baghouse I-R2 Baghouse I-R3 

Element RPD RPD RPD -------- -------- -·---- ------------ HCI 0.4o/o 0.3o/o 1.0°/o 

HF 5.3% 4.4% 2.1% 

Baghouse E-R1 Baghouse E-R2 Baghouse E-R3 

Element RPD RPD RPD -------------- ------------ ------------- ------------ HCI 0.6°/o 1.1°/o 1.2°/o 

HF 3.0°/o 0.4% NA 

Reagent Blank 

Element RPD 

HCI 1.4o/o 

HF NA 

Summary of Method 26A Spike Recoveries 

Baghouse I-R3 Baghouse E-R3 

Element Recovery Recovery --------. ------ -------- HCI 106% 105% 

HF 1 06°/o 94% 

e£ernent0ne 

57 
SAMPLE CUSTODY 

: .-. "' .. , -. :-•. ~. . . • • ( ! .. ~ .•.• f: .... ::. ~-; .'· .. !~.':t ... . - :··')•: :"' .. : .-.: .. :. •• - W- a 

.- :"', .:. ~ : ... _:i" ...: t!. 

58 
·':) 

CHA.IN OF CUSTODY 

8100- 7 

.... 

Dateffime 

Received By: Date/Time 
ANALYTICAL DATA 

e:fenref:llt.One 

60 
HCJ, HFWhereAnalytical Calculations 

Total HX (mg) =X Results (IJg/mL)*Dilution*Final Volume 

(mL)/1 OOO*Correction Factor 

X Results= Raw sampre concentration (ppm)-HC/, HF 10 Data Sheet 

Dilution= Diluted Volume-to Run Sheet 

Aliquot 

Final Volume--sample Submission 

1.028= Correction factor for hydrogen chloride 

1.053= Correction factor for hydrogen fluoride 

<==fernerttOne 

61 
One AIR DrESTING SAMPLE suBl\.inssuoN FOl:tfVI 11696 

lnte rit · Aii Monitorin , Inc. 

08-100 

Analysis Due Date 12.02.08 

QA/QC/Report Due Da~e ·t 2.04.08 

----·--------, 

i Date Rae.: '11.20.08 

J Time R~:~:;_ _1......;0;...;;2..;;....0 __ __. 

I jHN0 Volume L~ Marked@'N ~ ---~~-H_F_L_o_t--~~--~~j~_H_C_I_L_~_·~-~-~~~~~----~-~._~_-_M_e_fu_o_d_:_~ 1~--v-o-lu_m_e_L_o_ss_Y_____,/Qg:~'~'""· ~--?---fpH < 2.o{i)N . 26A 

S amp:e I ld en ff 1 sea f ·1on . 

Baghouse Inlet Baghouse Exhaust Blank 

1 8100-M26A-R1 4 81 OO-M26A-R 1 7 M26A-Bianr~ 

2 81 OO-M26A-R2 5 81 OO-M26A-R2 

3 81 OO-M26A-R3 6 81 OO-M26A-R3 

Analyses Requested Samples 1-7 HF, HCI 

·--··· Runs/FB lmplnger 1,2, & 3 (.1) lmplnger 4 & 5 (.2) NOTE --- ! FH lmpinger 1 FH lmpinger 2 FH lmpinger 3 BT BH 

LabiD or Combined FH - - BV,ml FV,m! BV, ml FV,ml BV,ml FV,ml 3V,ml FV,ml BV,ml FV~ml 

~ .• j..l \ \ 

----- ----- ~ 

-----· ·~ ---~ ........... 

·-·~-r-------

1 ' I 

----~ .. 2 2fJ._ "' ~ ~ ~ 

----- ----- -.............. -.............. :-:::__ .......... 

3.S i-3 .. ~ 

----- ~ ----- ~ ............._........, ~ ~. -- 4 1 ol:.~ '"'" 

----- -.............. ~ ~ 

----- ............._ ........... 

-----~ ~ -·--~ 

5 81-- ... 

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ~ ~ ~ 

6.8 g -r- .. ·- ~ ~ 

----- ~ ~-- ~ ~ 

R eagen t 81 an k s ----- Lab ID Fractions I 

BV,ml FV1 ml l\lat•3S 

I 

I 

7 0.1 N H2S04 I lSLo 

DIH20 

0.1 N NaOH 

--=-----

~ 

-----

----- -

Lab Communications 

SS Page 1 9/J:. n 

SSby g.~ 11/20/2008 t 725:14 PM 

l ,.u~: .•. d..:.. ..:~ \!;·· c::.'<.:--"'\!i.. \t\,d-'-\o<6 10'-= . ...-~\ -

I ·I , "· p . B I :) .. , ; , . .. , . .4 j."11• rnp I ._I .j 1 ep y Date K ?=-~~---1-:J., .. ~::..,._.:..l C:.:...;l-u..___ 

Imp 4 & 5 Prep By I Date _ 

ID Verification By/Date ]('[f;' i 1 f.;?·L;:;.:_~ ·.,_,_':l __ _ 

..... _/ 
IVIetronm t\J'I/t()CS ton ~.,.;nromatograpn ~ystem 

elementOne M26-HCIIC Data Sheet Lab ~D # e"l i 696 

Client: Integrity 

Date: 12/03-04/08 

Analyst: RLC 

Detection Limit, (fJgfln[j: 0:10 

cr Final 

Sample ID pg/ml Dilution Vol,ml 

--------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LRB 0.000 1 10 

LRB DUP 0.000 'I 10 

LRB SPK 5.068 10 

LRB SPK OUP 4.986 1 10 

11696-1 4.246 20 87 

11696-1 dup 4.228 20 87 

11696-2 4.538 20 82 

11696~2 dup 4.552 20 82 

11696-3 2.890 20 73 

11696-3 dup 2.920 20 73 

11696-3 spk 8.346 20 73 

11696-3 spl< dup 8.018 20 73 

11696-4 4.978 10 106 

11696-4 dup 5.008 10 106 

11696-5 6.275 10 87 

11696-5 dup 6.206 10 87 

11696-6 3.227 10 87 

11696-6 dup 3.187 10 87 

11696-6 spk 8.476 10 87 

11696-6 spk dup 8.426 10 87 

11696-7 0.428 2 86 

11696-7 dup 0.422 2 86 

1 of 2 

Cofumn: Metrosep A Supp 5 

ElfJent: 3.2 ml\11 Na2C03/1.0 m~Jl NaHC:~.!:;; 

Flow Rate: 0. 7ml/min. 

Cl" to HCI f41C~or: 1.028 

% 

I-ICl, Spil'\e, Ftecovery/ 

Total mg pg/mi 

---------- ---------- <0 

<0 

0.052 

0.051 

7.60 

7.57 

7.65 

7.68 

4.34 

4.38 

'12.5 

12.0 

5.43 

5.46 

5.61 

5.55 

2.89 

2:85 

7.58 

7.54 

0.076 

0.075 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

elementOnG~ 

e 1 '1696-HCI 

RPD 

----------

NA 

'101% 

100% 

0.4% 

0.3% 

1.0% 

~09% 

102% 

0.6% 

1.1% 

1.2% 

105% 

104% 

1.4% 

file name ds·i··;~ dma· ___________ .. ___ ----.............. _. --- sc031355.CHV1i 12/3/'::.CC·~· ~ 3:55 

sc031416.CHW 12/3/;~~08 '14:16 

sc031437.CHVV 12/3/2C08 14:37 

sc031457. CI-IVV 12/3/2-J'JS 14:57 

sc032130.CHV\' 12/3/20~18 21:30 

sc032151.CHW 12/3/2;)08 21 :51 

sc04-0057. CHW 12/4/2'J(\8 0:57 

sc040117.CHW 12/4/2008 'l :17 

sc032211.CHV~.o' 12/3/2~108 22:11 

sc032232.CHW 12/3/~2008 22:32 

sc032253.CHV\' 12/3/2-Joa 22:53 

sc032313.CHW 12/3/2008 23:13 

sc040138.CHVv' '12/4/2008 1 :38 

sc040159.CHVV 12/4/2:l08 1:59 

sc040219.CHW '12M·/2008 2:19 

sc040240.CHW 12/4/2008 2:40 

sc04030 1. CHV\1 12/4/2008 3:01 

sc040321.CHW 12/4/2008 3:21 

sc040342.CHW 12/4/2008 3:42 

sc040403.CHW 12/4/2008 4:03 

sc040546. CHVV 12/4/2008 5:46 

sc040607. CHVV 12/4/2D08 6:07 

... S~: 

~-; J. 'i 
.v,~uullut , v 111 oo 1v11 viiiUIIIaluyrcJ.Jn .:>ys\em 

elementOne M26 .. HCIIC Data She·et Lab ~D # e·t·i696 

Client: Integrity Coh.urm: Metrosep A Supp 5 

Date: 12/03-04/08 Elllent: 3.2 rnM Na2CQ3/1.0 mM NaHCC:.1 

Analyst: RLC Flow Rate: 0.7mL/min. 

Detection Limit, (IJg/ml): 0.'10 cr to HCI factor: 1.028 

cr 

Standards f.JQ/ml _____ .. _________ _________ .. 

0 0 

0.1 0.103 

1 0.851 

5 4.86'1 

10 10.080 

0.1 0.125 

1 0.880 

5 5.215 

10 9.891 

Correlation· 0.99978 

DL 0.113 

DL 0.109 

QC 4.676 

QC 4.711 

QC 4.698 

QC 4.667 

QC 4.476 

QC 4.461 

QC 4.473 

QC 4.549 

2 of2 

QC, % 

IJg/ml Recovery 

---------

0.10 

0.10 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

elementOne 

e 11696-HCI 

----------

·J03% 

85% 

97% 

101% 

125% 

88% 

104% 

99% 

1'13% 

109% 

94% 

94% 

94% 

93% 

90% 

89% 

89% 

9'1% 

fila name datr. t~ma 

_____ ...... ------ ------··-··---· -·· sc030932.CHW 12/3/0f 9:32. AM 

sc030953.CHVI/ 12/3/2008 9:53 

sc031014.CH\N 12/3/2008 10:14 

sc031034.CHVI/ 12/3/2008 1 0:34-

sc03'1 055.CHW 12/3/20C8 :C:55 

sc041300.CHW 12/4/2008 '13:00 

sc041320.CHW 12/4/20C3 13:20 

sc041341.CHW 12/4/2009 13:41 

sc041402.CHW 12/4/2008 14:·:32 

sc031314.CHW 12/3/2C 08 12.: 14 

sc031335.CHW 12/3/2008 '13 :35 

sc032334.CHW '12/3/2008 23:34 

sc032355.CHW 12/3/2008 23:55 

sc040423.CHW 12/4/2008 4:23 

sc040444.CHW 12/4/2008 4:44 

sc040831.CHVI/ 12/4/2008 S:31 

sc040852.CHW 12/4/2008 8:52 

sc041158.CHW ~ 2/4/2008 11 :58 

sc041422.CHW 12/4/2008 14:22 

6'~-:t :-

(,. ·" J 
Metrohm 761/788 ion chromatograph system 

elementOne M26-1-IF IC Data Sheet i ....... ~b ~ .,;: I qi) ' #" .! U ·j ·~ ,·~)96 

Client: Integrity Colun1n: IVIetrosep A Supp 5 

Date: 12/03-04/08 Eluent: 3.2 rnM Na CC~ 11.0 n-,rvi NaHC03 

Analyst: RLC F~o\.v Rate: O.?mL/min. 

Detection Limit, {f.Jg/n11): 0.10 F- to HF factor; 1.053 

'"'o 

Final HF, Total Spil<e, Recovery/ 

Sample ID F" pg/n1l Dilution Vol,ml 

--------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LRB 0.000 10 

LRB DUP 0.000 10 

LRB SPK 4.688 10 

LRB SPKDUP 4.810 1 10 

11696-1 2.336 20 87 

11696-1 dup 2.2'15 20 87 

11696-2 2.492 20 82 

11696-2 dup 2.603 20 82 

11696-3 1.580 20 73 

11696-3 dup 1.613 20 73 

11696-3 spk 6.843 20 73 

11696-3 spk dup 6.910 20 73 

11696-4 0.168 2 106 

11696-4 dup 0.163 2 106 

11696-5 0.222 2 87 

11696-5 dup 0.223 2 87 

11696-6 0.087 2 87 

11696-6 dup 0.098 2 87 

11696-6 spk 4.707 2 87 

11696-6 spk dup 4.898 2 87 

11696-7 0.081 2 86 

11696-7 dup 0.057 2 86 

IC-M26-Data-HF 1 of 2 

mg ~g/ml _______ .,. __ ---------- <0 

<0 

0.049 5.00 

0.051 5.00 

4.28 

4.06 

4.30 

4.49 

2.43 

2.48 

10.5 5.00 

10.6 5.00 

0.037 

0.036 

0.041 

0.041 

<0.02 

< 0.02 

0.862 5.00 

0.897 5.00 

< 0.02 

< 0.02 

eletnentOne 

e 11696-HF 

RPD 

----------

NA 

94% 

96% 

5.3% 

4.4% 

2.1% 

105% 

106% 

3.0% 

0.4% 

N,A, 

92% 

96% 

NA 

fil·a nat-ne: 

-·-------------· 

sc03'1355.CHV'/ 

sc03'l416.CHvV 

sc03'1437 .CH\:'J 

sc031457.Crh'·/ 

sc032130. C H'JV 

sc032151.CH'.JV 

sc040057.CH'N 

sc040117.CH~t"J 

sc03221'1.CH'N 

sc03L232.CHv .. ; 

sc03~253.CHVV 

sc032313.CH\V 

sc040750.CHVJ 

sc040811.CH\.V 

sc040954.CH\N 

sc041 014.CH\IV 

sc041035.CH'Jv' 

sc041056.CHVV 

sc041'!16.CHVI/ 

sc041137.CI-IV" 

sc040546.CHVV 

sc040607 .CH\1'/ 

date time 

--------------

·:2/3/2008 13:55 

12/3/2008 14:16 

't2/3/2008 14:37 

'i 2/3/2008 14:57 

'12/3/2008 21 :30 

'12/3/2008 21:51 

'12/4/2008 0:57 

'12/4/2008 1:17 

12/3/2008 22:11 

'12/3/2008 22:32 

12/3/2008 22:53 

12/3/2008 23:13 

12/4/2008 7:50 

12/4/2008 8:11 

12/4/2008 9:54 

12/4/2008 10:14 

12/4/2008 1 0:35 

'1:2/4/2008 1 0:56 

12/4/2008 11 : 16 

'12/4/2008 11:37 

'12/4/2008 5:46 

12/4/2008 6:07 

.·Sf ,~1 (.". 0 
Metrohm 761/788 ion chromatograph system 

elementOne M26-HF IC 

Client: Integrity 

Date: 12/03-04/08 

Analyst: RLC 

Detection Limit, {1-Jg/rrn&): 0.10 

Standards F 1lg/n11 

--------------- ---------- 0 0.000 

0.1 0.082 

1 0.9i9 

5 4.839 

10 10.085 

0.1 0.097 

0.874 

5 5.441 

10 10.3'18 

Correlation .. 0.99980 

DL 0.098 

DL 0.084 

QC 5.022 

QC 4.891 

QC 4.958 

QC 5.030 

QC 5.075 

QC 5.034 

QC 5.064 

QC 4.980 

IC-M26-Data-HF 2 of 2 

Data Sheet la:b H)#: ··r .. ~<CH6 

Column: Metrosep A Supp 5 

Efuent: 3.2 111M Na2C03/1.0 111~11 hlaHC03 

F~ow Rate: 0. ?t11L/n .. 1in. 

F" to IHF. factur: 1.053 

QC, 

IJg/rnl 

----------

0.10 

0.10 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

5.00 

elementOne 

e 11696-HF 

o/o 

Recovery 

----------

82% 

92% 

97% 

101% 

97% 

87% 

109% 

193% 

98% 

84% 

100% 

98% 

99% 

101% 

102% 

·f01% 

101% 

100% 

file tuame 

--··---·· ------···· sc03C932.CH'J'./ 

sc030953.CH\"l 

sc031 0 14.CH\·'v 

sc03'l034.CH'N 

sc031"055.CH\'V 

sc041300. CH'N 

sc041320.CH\V 

sc041341. CH\N 

sc041402. CH\N 

sc031:314.CH'N 

sc031335.CHW 

sc032334.CHV~/ 

sc032355.CHVV 

sc040423.CH\N 

sc040444.CHV1

/ 

sc040831.CHVV 

sc040852.CHV'/ 

sc041158.CHVV 

sc041422. C HV1/ 

date time 

---------------

·: 2/3/2008 9:32 

'! 2/3/2008 9:53 

'12/3/2008 1 0: 14 

12/3/2008 1 0:34 

12/3/2008 10:55 

12/4/2008 13:00 

12/4/2008 13:20 

1214/2008 13:41 

12/4/2008 14:02 

12/3/2008 13:14 

12/3/08 13:35 

•J2/3/08 23:34 

~ 2/3/08 23:55 

12/4/08 4:23 

12/4/08 4:44 

12/4/08 8:31 

12/4/08 8:52 

12/4/08 11:58 

12/4/08 14:22 

66 

~·~·1 7 
elementOne ~C Sample Sheet/Diges.titn·a ViJor~ts.heet 

Date: 1~/ oj l·~>~ 

Analyst: fZ L L 

Batch name: 1 ' 1r. ~ ,:_, 1:: .- ,~ ~ j .... ~ ~ _,, ,;!..v _. ..,. 4 -.,qo' • ...,-

Column: Metmsep A Supp 5 

Eluent: 3.2 mM Na2C03/1.0mM Nai-IC03 

Flow Rate: .7 rnL!min. Method: ) f.:? tq 

AS LOC. Sampie ID Client Analyte F.Vol.(n1l} wetg;(;J=;~:;.~~-r spu1e(ug/mtJ 

I CJ e..CL-n '· n '·~ bl L rv-~·-·-

I •-I 

~ o.c 

j o., 

'i }. 0 

-· r 5 !:),(.) I r=--j 

((- /0.0 

7 Qc. I 

~ Qc_. I 

£1 13! a_,, f:;_ 

Io Bl Ctn L ' 

l \ DL r- I 1 1_. 

J;l, DL. I 

i - i JJ LK.lS I 

i'1 J_f-(3 (.) L~·--f 

15 p )_~~ s,<-·~~ 

Jtp /..,{!./!. .5f? /;'ft..L;C.' 

&0 I H.~ t:; te .... . f ::f;,,f. F,ct ,!) ('· .. · ... , ( .... .., 

U.t --1 DirtP ; - &!J. ·- .<.. .... i. ~ i 1 

u3 -] Otq~ j 

j ·--r·-··--- l.o'-( -:s ::)t'tt- j I 

Lqs -6 Sf';!:.. Oi.r:O ~ 

/..otp Qc.. 

l..i7- Qc l 

(off Bt a11 t'"" ~ ~l7 I ~~=~ 

Cai.Standard Lot# 0g05L2 ::~( QC Lot# ()8 (5 o~O Comments: ------------------------------------------------------- Spike 50 uL from 1000 ug/mL Std. to 10mL sample Lot #'s: rc Solution A .IC Solutfon s _________ _ 

Submitted for QC- Date: J~'lf()'-{(o~ Time: /t.{)t:;' By: Rt c:... QC Review- Date:IJ.(~c.r{M Time: ./t.{6S' By: s?,·.c 

R•Te~Req~~~No ~ ~s Comme~~------~~---------------~~-----~~- Re-Submltted for QC- Date: Time: By: ____ QC Review- Date: Time: _By: ___ _ 
elementOne 

Date: l). t o.:>f 0 <s 

Analyst: r2. L.L 

Column: Metrosep A Supp 5 

Eluent: 3.2 mf\1 Na2C03/1.0niM NaHC03 

Batch name: 1 ;;to3c.\ .... , i 4, "·i L: Flow Rate: . 7 ml/min. 

AS LOC. Sampk-:J lD 

&9 

''fro I I f I 1 ' ; r: --

J(tp_Cp-<.' .... r'l.. I f : ' i .,J:=i":L; 

":lJ I 1~2. I 

'13 

·1y 

'15 

1-f.t; 

'f:r 

1-g 

1-&1 

6'1) 

8"l 

.8".1 

8•3 

8l( 

8"5 

Cai.Standard Lot# QC Lot# Comments: _____________ _ 

Spike 50 ul from.1000 ug/mL Std. to 10mL sample Lot#•s: IC Solution A IC Solution 8. ______ _ 

Submitted for QC- Date: Time: By: QC Review- Date: Time: ___ By:. __ _ 

R•Te~Requim~No Yes Commen~: ______________________ _ 

Re-Submitted for QC- Date: Time: By: ___ QC Review- Date: ___ Time:; ___ By: .. ___ _ 
elementOne ·, .:·JI.(.; 'Li'"J ;~. . , .' .;, qtl-: -··· ~ lJa. ··- u· 

Date: 

Analyst: R.l.(.,· 

Column: Metrof:: epA Supp 5 

Eluent: 3.2 ml\1 l\la CO~ 1.0mM NaHC03 

Batch name: Flow Rate: . 7 rnUmin. Method: ~)L.; ,:-1 

Client 

: I I i ~~/--!i----1 

=t-~ -=-~-=-~ -=-: -t=-~ -=-~ -=-~ -=-~ -=-~ -=--~-=:~=-~-=-J=.-i-~=-~ -=-+-~ -=-~-~=-{-:=--~=:~r--~------ll-· -----~-~~-=~-----~ 

~~-----~~--1~--~J--f=~i--~ 

1-----t------t-----+---,:-l --+----,--,~------1 I : I 

~~-------~----------------------t--------------~------------r--------------~----------~· ~---------------~ I j 

~----------;-----------------t-----------+--------,1-, --------+-------+------~--------1 

-----+--------~~----------~,----------~--------~----------r--------------~ I 

r------------;---------------------t-----------r-----------~--------t------------~---------.-----------~ 

i I ·+-------t 

r-~----+-------~------~-------+------------l--------~------~--------~---------1 t----+----..:..,_--+-------f-----------~----1-------4·------L. _____ -I 

a--+-----+----+---l---4----1-----··+------t 

I

I ------~------~----~·-~------~--------~·~----~~·--------~-------~-----------

Cal. Standard Lot# ______ QC Lot # _________ Comments: ___________________ _ 

Spike 50 uL from 1000 ug/mL St.j, to 10ml sample Lot Ws: IC Solution A iC Solutions ____ _ 

Submitted for QC- Date: Time: By: QC Review- Date: Time: By: __ _ 

Re-TestRequi~d-No ·~s Comments:~---~----------~--~------------~ 

Re-Submitted for QC- Date: Time: By: ___ QC Review- Date: ___ Time: ____ • By: __ _ 
··. 

• ·l 

·i 

l·i 

!'i 

:i 

t:_; 

19 

20 

21 22 

23 24 25 26 27 

26 

29 

30 31 

32 

33 34 

60 

61 

62 

63 

64 65 

66 

67 68 

69 

'10 

71 

72 

73 

74 

75 

76 77 

78 

79 eo 

'.• .} 

t 

:·i 

..i 

.-. ": 

•.) .I 

1•.! 

!fl ) 

10.0· 10.0 

10.0 10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 10.0 

10.0 

1U.O 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0i 10.0. 10.0 10.0' 10.0' 10.0 10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 10.0 10.0 

10.0: 

10.0 10.0 

10.0: 

10.0 

:. 

!·• 

i ·:-

! 1 

1 •i 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0· 

1.0 

·t.o 

1.0 

1.0 1.0 

1.0 

1.0· 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 

1.0 

1.0· 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 1.0 

1.0. 

1.0 

1.0 1.0 

1.0 

1.0 1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

,._, 

: 1 

I.: 

;j 

: ., ... ) 

1 .... 

I) 

1 n 

1!"· 

10 

;1 

I !J 

1.0 

1.0 

'1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0. 

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 

1.0 

1.0 1.0 

1.0. 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

i• .. ... .t 

!f ·: 1 

:•.·' ti 

1 ......... . 

. .:. 

:i}l:.t.: 

n 

1'Jt1 n 

t) 

::J(l i• 

'11:.1.1." 

100.0 

100.0 

100.0, 

100.0· 

100.0 

100.0 

100.0; 100.0' 

100.0 100.0. 100.0 

100.0· 

100.0 

100.0: 

100.0 100.0. 

100.0: 

100.0 

100.0i 

100.0: 

100.0 

100.0 

100.0. 

100.0 100.0 

100.0 

100.0 100.0. 

100.0· 

100.0 

100.0 

100.0 

100.0 

1oo.o: 

100.0 100.0 

100.0; 

Page1 

·.• 

I} 

.; 

0 

0 

0 

0 0 

o· 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 o· 0 

0 0 0 

0. 0 0 0 

Q. 

0 

0 

0: 

0 0 o' 

0 

Sample Info 1 

0-CtLit) 

o. 08''-1.. 

c1-=-.. O:iJ3 

C.l o. 10'1 

C.t-:::. 5.0L·9 

(./:;!. 4·. &J91,., 

wc...3 -=-o.o3':;J. 

1\MJ,:i::.: o. O(fi..; 

Sample Info 2 

l 
N 

('. 

-.J .. -

r- Sample Info 2 

'81·--·--10.0 

82 10.0 1.0 

83 10.0 1.0 100.0 

04 H}.O 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 C1 '::::r.:.,.,,z_ ~· 

35 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 f". Ci. 2X (I -.:. :_-.. -LLJ?. ~;·-~:~, 

85 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 P. Cl. !.\ 

... ~ 

ff/ 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 F Ct • .:'X 

88 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 F.('[, 2.\' 

89 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 F. C/.1.\' 

90 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 F. Cl. J.\' 

91 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 F. Cl. ?X 

92 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 f'. Cl. 1X. J.O ppm 

93 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 F. Cl. JX. .5.1Jppm 

94 10.0 1.0 1.0 1(10.0 o. 0 5.0ppm v.:' 

95 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0. o· 

05.0p~/ 

96 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 ~ 

97 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 :;.,r 

98 10.0 1.0· 1.0· 100.0 o. 0 F. C1.2X F-;;: o., ~ rr 

99 10.0 1.0 1.0 ·iOO.O 0. 0 F. CJ. 1.'<' 

F'";!'-~~ 

O.flo~ 

00 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0: 0 F. CI.JX F:: 0,-'4o o. ;;u-: .. 3 

01 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0: 0 r"'. Ct. '!.X p·:::. f) .. :l<~.:.t 

02 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 0 F. Cl. ~X i2f 

103 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 o· 0 F. Ct.~.\' ~ 

04 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 o· 0 F. ci. 2X ).f) ppm i.J. "}b~ 

05 10.0 ·J.O• 1.0 100.0 0 0 F. Cl. 2\: J;!J't'"' ;_,. a-"l S" 

06 10.0 1.0· 1.0 100.0 o. 0 S.fJpp_!.JI ~ 

07 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0; 0 -.r: 

08 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 o. 0 ... ~ 

09 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0; 0 ./" 

10 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 o: 0 ./-

11 10.0 1.0: 1.0 100.0 o· 0 

12 

13 10.0 

'10.0 1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0. 

100.0 0: 0 ~ 100.0 0 0 5.0pp111 

14 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0; 0 0./ ppm 

15 10.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0 o. 

---· 

~-----·-

Page2 
APPENDIX4 

CALffiRATION DATA 

72 
APEX INSlRUMENTS METHOD 5 POST-TEST CONSOLE CALIBRATION 

USING CALIBRATED CRffiCAL ORIFICES 

5-POINT ENGLISH UNITS 

Meter Console lnfotmction Cclibnation Conditions 

Console fllodd Number c-5000-1 Date lnme 24-0ct-08 10:00 

Console Numlter 1400 Barometric Pressure 29.59 lnHg 

DGM Model Number s-200 Theoretical Critical Vacuum 1 13.9 lnHg DGM SeriZII Number 9605808 Calibration Technician EWC 

zThe Critical Coefficient, K". must be entered In EngrJSh ui111s. 

CafibraUon Data 

RunTime Metertng Console Critical Orifice 

DGMOriflcc Volume Volume OuUetTemp OuUelTemp Serial Coefficient AmbTemp 

Bapsed liH Initial Final lnHial Fiml Number lni&l 

(6) (P,.) (V..J (Vrd) <Y (l,d K' ('-J 

min lnHzO cubic feet a.d:lic feet "F "F seeabove2 "F 

12.0 0.25 490.642 494.386 69 73 40 0.2386 70 

10.0 0.60 486.053 490.608 66 69 48 0.3485 69 

10.0 1.10 516.250 522.388 81 84 55 0.4585 73 

11.0 1.90 507.530 516210 78 82 63 0.5934 72 

12.0 3.60 494.537 507.471 74 79 73 0.8176 72 

Results 

StllndaRlizl:d Data Dry GIIS Meter 

Calibration FadoT Rowrate AH@ 

Dry Gas Meter Criti"l Orifice Value Variation std&Corr 0-75SCFM Vattation 

(V-> (Vcrc.> (Y) {6V} (AHft) (MH@) 

cubic feet d'm cutJ!cfeel cfm cfm in H20 

3.684 0.307 3.677 0.306 0.998 0.004 0.306 1.476 -0.226 

4.516 0.452 4.481 0.448 0.992 -o.001 0.448 1.670 -o.032 

5.905 0.590 s.an 0.588 0.995 0.001 0.588 1.735 0.033 

8.433 0.767 8.370 0.761 0.993 -o.001 0.761 1.803 0.101 

12.701 1.058 12.587 1.049 0.991 . -0.003 1.049 1.825 0.123 

0.994 YAvetage 1.702 4H@Avcrage 

Cammllion FaciDT Y, the ratlo of the reading of the callbraUon meteT to the city gas meter. acceptable tolerance of individual values from lhe average is +-0.02. 

Date 

Sid Temp Sid Press 

K, 

AmbTemp 

RnaJ 

(t....,) 

"F 

72 

70 

73 

73 

72 
APEX INSTRUMENTS METHODS POST-TEST CONSOLE CALIBRATION 

USING CAUBRATED CRITICAL ORIFICES 

5-POINT ENGUSH UNITS 

Meter Console lnfonnaUon Callbr.sUon Conditions 

Console Model Number C.SOOG-3 Date lnme 24-0ct-OB 10:00 Console Serial Number 1466 Barometric Pressure 29.59 lnHg 

DGM Model s-275 Theoretical Critical Vacuum 1 14.6 lnt-lg 

DGM Serial Number 9605809 Caffbr.stlon Technician EWC 

1For valid test results, Ute Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 21n. Hg greater Ulan the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above. 

2The Critical Orifice Coefficient. K.", must be entered in EngliSh units, (tr"Rm)l(ln.Hg-mln). 

Callbr.tUon Data 

RunTime Metering C011$olc 

DGMOrifice Volume Volume OuUetTcmp OuUetTemp Serial Coemclent AmbTemp 

6H Initial Final lnillal Final Number Initial 

(9} (P.,) (V,..) (V..,) (1,.) (!,.,) K' (t..m) 

"*' In liP Clibk:feet IDllcfeet "F "F seeabove2 "F 

10.0 0:0 275.805 278.962 82 BS 40 0.2386 72 11.0 0.61 270.696 275.778 78 85 48 0.3485 72 

12.0 1.10 263.451 270.660 72 82 55 0.4585 70 

10.0 1.9tl 255.665 263.407 68 n 63 0.5934 59 

10.0 3.70 279.166 290:093 84 94 73 0.8176 73 

Results 

Standardized Data Dry Gas Meter 

Callbr.stlon Factor Flowratc .4H«l! 

Dry Gas Meter Critical Orifice Value Variation Std&Corr 0.75SCFM Variauon 

(Vmhld)) (Vcrhld)) {Y) (AH@} (6AH@) 

cublcfeet cfm cubiefeet dm cfm In H20 

3.031 0.303 3.060 0.305 1.009 0.006 0.308 1.561 -0.164 

4.908 0.446 4.918 0.447 1.002 -0.001 0.447 1.662 -0.063 

7.029 0.586 7.065 0.589 1.005 0.002 0.589 1.747 0.022 

7.628 0.763 7.631 0.763 1.000 -0.003 0.763 1.818 0.093 

10.489 1.049 10.479 1.048 0.999 -0.004 1.048 1.837 0.112 

1.003 YAYela08 1.725 Mf@Averoge 

I Note: For Calibration FactorY. the ratio of the reading of the calibration meter to the d!y gas meter, acceplable tolerance of Individual values from lhe average Is +-0.02. 

Date 

StdTemp 

StdPress 

K, 

AmbTemp 

Final 

P-.t.) 

"F 

73 

72 

72 

70 

73 

24.()cl.()8 
Approved Alternative Method (AL T -009) liJ 

Alternative Method 5 Post-Test Calibration 

Florlm USA • November 18, 2008 .£ 

Baghouse Outlet 

Run Run Meter Volume Meter Meter Box Bar. Avg. Moi.Wt. Pretest Posttest 

No. Time Box No. Metered Temp. AH@ Press. AH ·Dry MeterY MeterY 

1 60 C-5000-1 43.493 67.3 1.702 29.88 1.70 29.0 0.994 1.023 

2 60 C-5000·1 44.328 77.8 1.702 29.88 1.70 29.0 0.994 1.014 

3 60 C-5000-1 44.870 81.6 1.702 29.88 1.70 29.0 0.994 1.005 

Mean= 0.994 1.014 

Bagbouse Inlet 

Run Run Meter Volume Meter Meter Box Bar. Avg. Moi.Wt. Pretest Posttest 

No. Time Box No. Metered Temp. AH@ Press. AH Dry MeterY MeterY 

1 60 C-5000·3 34.250 68.6 1.725 29.88 1.00 29.0 1.003 1.000 

2 60 C-5000·3 34.331 72.4 1.725 29.88 1.00 29.0 1.003 1.002 

3 60 C-5000-3 34.397 73.4 1.725 29.88 1.00 29.0 1.003 1.001 

Mean= 1.003 1.001 

75 
Date:. " 4/3/2008,. . --· 

Type:. · · : NuTech • :· . · 

·. '-

Nominal DGM 

Flow Initial 

(lpm) (liters) 

B .· :-:- O.QO .. ·: .. .. ·o.o.o 

B :· __ ·o.oo·.:· ---=--o.oo .-.-- ·_ ·-:o .•. Q.o .. ·_. 

B 0.00 ··- o.oo 1.:·: -· -o:oo:·_. 

G .-:.·.o.oo _ _:.· 0100·:···. -·.o.oo ' 

DGM 

Final 

(liters) 

. 2]1. 

··.2.68-:_-:--_ 

.. ,_2J?8 

_· 5;43"·.·.-:·· 

;:_.PA'i 

'8:-18 .: 

.BAa.'·--:-

,8;14 

;:.-10;8_4_ -

-:10.86 

: .. J5.24 

Calibration performed by:_ EWC 

...... 

0) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg):l·-:29.65. ·-1 

Dry Gas Meter 

Volume DGMTemp. Average 

Total Initial Final Temp. 

(liters) {OF) (OF) {oF) 

2.71 '·=::_-70::,·: -· ·:: :· '71.5_ :· 

2.68 ]3t ::.r:: . :. : ;7 .. 73:5't···. 2.68 -. ··; ·.' : : '="75:0-: 

5.46 -·:-_:<:82' -· -.. a1:o· .. 

5.43 82 .. .. .. ·_.-. 

5.41 : :, ,' .. •. ·· '·. 

8.18 --.:. 86·: __ :.- : ··,:-... .. '·. 

8.16 r-J:at; =' b9' 1:·> :· -:.aa.o··· •. 

8.14 ·. · ... . •"_JJ9;_5 .· :. 

10.84 . --··:·9.0·. :· - .. :. :.-90.5 10.86 '91 .'.92: :·::·=91:5·:-15.24 ... ::-_92:' -_·,· ·- :-, 

DGM Average 

Pressure Row 

{in H20) (liters/min) 

-0.497·· 

::·''0.6:::::·, OA92 ':f 

.... ·:· .-=·:OA98.· 

. ·.: ;1 :t:"<·f = 1. •. 

._·::-_ :1'.1···,_·· 

0.998 -:::• 

:2>•}: ·. 

'.J_ .. ·-1.507 :. 

··- ·:·=?.· .::: ::\ .): .. 

-

.. 

:: 2.013-:·_ 

-

... ·3,_6·:= 

Reference Meter 

Type: ;Aow .. callbrator: . . . 

Model: · 

·::· :1·_ --==-· •• • 

Bubble Meter 

Total Volume Ambient 

Time Total Temperature 

(min) (liters) (OF) 

5.0 2.483 { ··:'73.0 .. 5.0 2.460 : 

5.0 2.488 . . .73.0. .' 5.0 5.035 :_ ', 

5.0 5.010 : .... ':." 

5.0 4.991 ::· ·-73.0 . .-:. 5.0 7.553 · .. 74.0. :' ::.· 

5.0 7.535 __ .... _ .. , . =----

5.0 7.523 <.:· 5.0 10.065 - . __ :: 5.0 10.065 : · ···: · 

7.0 14.112 :;· ·. 
Nominal 

A ow 

(lpm) 

B 

c=l 

CJ 

B 

8 . . 

DGM 

Initial 

(liters) 

DGM 

Final 

(liters) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg):l:::=·-29.5 ·:'-j 

Dry Gas Meter 

Volume 

Total 

(liters) 

DGMTemp. 

Initial Final 

(OF) (OF) 

Average 

Temp. 

(OF) 

DGM 

Pressure 

1-'-:. .: ·,,_. 0.00 I· .. .... -u·:=:J:.\: .. ::·. #DIV/01-·1·)·::::::::::· :,_.--::.1 

1·.=·' : · ·I o.oo L =, ... : .. #DN/01..:: 

1··.::0.00 ·.d :·· .. :: :-= .. :=:=.> d 0.00 I::·;·:· .. .. ... ::{:.,,.;:,_J . · : ... ,-:=:;:::::;<-::_1 

=. = = .. o.oo.-::::· =·= · ·. ·;_ .. ·.,. 0.00 

0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 

···.::. 0.00 ": :10.78.:;: 10.78 :,. · .. ::-71··. ·:':;: ::;71·,_: .. =., .. .":··.71.0':::: .:: .''·'.·3.8 .; .:· 

10.69 .:: ,-:: .. 71 :::;: ·.72: :<- ···.:'7.1.5 .. -;' ·:-:3.8:·-;.:: 

.= :,,·o.oo-:_=·:· · .. ·.-10.63·:> · 10.63 

Calibration perfonned by:_ EWC 

Average 

Row 

(liters/min) 

h-#DIV/Or I 

L'.'#DIV/01:-I 

I·' #DIV/0! · I 

>#OIV/01:: 

·:··fiDIV/01:=.: 

·:=·#OIV/01 :: 

··:·1#QIV/OI-:,. 

.-<·2.059;· .. 

; : ·. 2.032 '::.: 

·.::·2.012---.;.,. 

Reference Meter 

Type: Row -:., 

Model: oryeal oC-ute SIN: :102479·.- 3.'t=" •. : ·. • . · .. 

Bubble Meter 

Total Volume Ambient 

Time Total Temperatur

(min) (tilers) rF> 

I #DIV/0! I· .. ····-

I #OIV/0! 1·:· : . . : ·. 

I tJOIV/01 I _.;=; .. ,_, . 

#OIV/01 ······ 

#DIV/0! =:· :·-··:···.: 

#OIV/0! .: ..... -.-;·_ .. #OIV/0! ·;.: ... :· .·: .. · . ..... #DIV/01 :-. · ..... ... 

#DIV/01 1·:;._.· :·;::·.:=";-_• ··: .

5.0 10295 .:.-... :. 5.0 10.160 .· .. ··;:,::72.0:.:

5.0 10.060 = ... : .. 
Date: . .- ·· ·, :: :: · 

Type:i :· _: :NUJecH/ 

.·. ·::. 

Nominal 

A ow 

(lpm) 

DGM 

Initial 

(liters) 

DGM 

Final 

(liters) 

G . :0.00· . 

L:J 

·.: ._ . _:_. 2.5.08 -.. 

Barometric Pressure (In Hg):l ::",.29"65_··.1 

Dry Gas Meter 

Volume 

Total 

(liters) 

DGMTemp. 

Initial Anal 

COF) (°F) 

Average 

Temp. 

(OF) 

DGM 

Pressure 

(in H20) 

B 

B .. o.oo .• 10.427 .;:";· ... 63··:::.: :·: 10.416 >.:63::- .. :·:-:.:,:64·.::_:: ;'·:·63:5"·: "·,·.1!4 •-' .. o.oo. .. 38(h 10.386 :::-· fi3··.::· ::.:·a3;5. -_·1:.4.···· 

Average 

Row 

(liters/min) 

.. 498_:: 

:-·., 

:. > ().490.:;::-

>_7" 0.99.7•':':·: 

"'?!·1_.oo.z:::.: 

.. : 

1Ji19'::.:·. 

·: 

\.2 .. 

. :: 

Reference Meter 

· ·, .":· 

Model: ;o,.Y¢ai .oc-lite.DCL-M 

SIN: ;1 Oi419 ·. : -·· .:· , · · . . . 

Bubble Meter 

Total Volume Ambient. 

Time Total Temperature 

(min) (liters) (oF) 

5.0 2.490" ., 

5.0 2 .. 471 ·:···:·74:0: ·.:.· 5.0 2.452 .. 5.0 4.984 . ··!. 5.0 4.939 :-=:- ·· .·:· 11 5.0 5.010 ·' ··· 

5.0 7.615 ''71.0· ... 

5.0 7.595 ''71.0. 

5.0 7.600 :-:.; :· .. _. .. 

5.0 10.130 •. j : . 72.0 ·::.::::> . 

5.0 10.090 :-.;· .72.0· .. :· 

5.0 10.110 :·.• .:72.0:.;::·-:-. 
Nominal 

A ow 

(Jpm) 

DGM 

Initial 

(liters) 

DGM 

Final 

(liters) 

··:· ·O.OO.X-: ·· ':. ·· ·.:: 

·o.oo.·.·.· :-. . , .. :.,. . . · 

: :0.00 .. : . :-::·:: .": '·, 

': :.=-; =<·(:.: _::,_,;: .• : .• ;.::_ 

::: .. o.oo:::= _,. -·=)::=-::· = 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg): I , 29.5 ··I 

Dry Gas Meter 

Volume 

Total 

(liters) 

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

0.000 0.000 

DGMTemp. 

Initial Final 

\F) (.F) 

Average 

Temp. 

\F) 

DGM 

Pressure 

(in H20) 

.·-<·.'. =·. . . . .. '' :· . :.#QJV/01-:: ...... 

, .. · / ·.· ·.#DIV/0!·: :.,.-.· .. 

::•:·· · · .. ·:.·· · .... ···. · ,:, · #DIV/01-:. .. ,.:.,·. :,':·:·: 

: ·;=.:-···.:::· . ...... : :#OIV/01. :,::-.-.-: .::· 

0.000 ·.•· :-:: :_:-: ·:= ·;::: ·:.' · ·::.=:<'·: ·_:. :,,:...,._:·:. )#DIV/OL:. t .. 

·=· .. =.o.oo. , ... ,·:10.639 ,: 10.639 ._·, ·:':71:: .. · · .. ,-_ .. ·:.;:---11.0 .:-· . · .. 

= ..·,:<10.653.). 10.653 .'' ·-71.5·:.: .. ; .,.<.-:·3.0 ... 

.. 0.00 ..... :.10.732. 10.732 .:::'· --.72 .. ·· .•. _: .. , :72<.;, .. ·.- :·: ;72.p: .... :_,, · ... ·.3.0 .:.,··:·· 

Average 

Flow 

(rrters/min) 

,: #DIV/01·: 

..tiOIV/01·: 

-d#DIV/01 :· 

·,_: #DIV/01::-, 

;.'.#QJV/0! .:: 

:diDIV/OL· 

I I 

·. =:·;2;()78. : 

.. · 

:·. 2.072:·:;. 

Reference Meter 

Type: :Flow •. : ·.-,: ·,,.'.· ·: 

Model: ;oryCal oC.Ute:bcl-M·:, · 

02479. ,. · :.: ·= ·::: . ···::·, · 

Bubble Meter 

Total Volume Ambient 

Time Total Temperature 

(min) (liters) \F) 

#DIV/01 #DIV/01 #OIV/0! :•. 

#OIV/0! ·=··:·:._..:·:·.:·/.:::.:;. #OIV/0! .:::()· .. .. =; .. . ·. ·:·: #DIV/0! ... .. 

0.000 0.000 0.000 

5.0 10.390 ........ 72.0 

5.0 10.395 ..... · 

5.0 10.360 .. :73.0· ... 

Calibration petformed by:. __ 
Pre-Test Thermocouple Calibration Form 

Client 

City, State 

Integrity Job No. 

Date 

Equipment 

IDNo. 

08.176 

05.157 

07.212 

. 07.213 

07.214 

07.215 

03.004 

07.338 

03.006 

03.007 

03.303 

03.304 

03.400 

Florlm USA 

Clarksville, TN 

08-100 

11/14/08 

Equipment 

Description 

Pltot 

Pitot 

Umb. Adapter 

Umb. Adapter 

Umb. Adapter 

Umb. Adapter 

Console 

Console 

Console 

Console 

Omega HH-25 

Omega HH-25 

Barometer 

Reference Barometer No. 14425 

Reference Thermometer No. 5039P 

Reference 

Thermometer Thermocouple Allowable 

Temperature, °F Reading, °F Tolerance, °F 

72 72 1.1 

72 72 1.1 

72 72 1.1 

72 73 1.1 

72 72 1.1 

72 72 1.1 

72 72 1 '1 

72 72 1 '1 

72 72 1.1 

72 72 1 '1 

72 71 1.1 

72 72 1.1 

Reference Barometer 

Barometric Pres. Reading 

29.24 29.26 

Performed By: EWC 

80 
Post· Test Thermocouple Calibration Form 

D 

Client Florim USA 

City, State Clarksville, TN A A~• MONitOIUNO • ..C. 

Integrity Job No. 08-100 

Date 11/21/08 Reference Barometer No. 14425 

Stack Temp (Max) 341°F Reference Thermometer No. 5039P 

Reference 

Equipment Equipment Thermometer Thermocouple Allowable 

ID No. Description Temperature, °F Reading, °F Tolerance, °F 

08.176 Pltot 352 351 5.3 

05.157 Pltot 352 352 5.3 

07.212 Umb. Adapter 68 67 1.0 

07.213 Umb. Adapter 68 88 1.0 

07.214 Umb. Adapter 68 88 1.0 

07.215 Umb. Adapter 68 68 1.0 

03.004 Console 68 68 1.0 

07.338 Console 68 88 1.0 

03.006 Console 68 68 1.0 

03.007 Console 68 68 1.0 

03.303 Omega HH-25 352 350 5.3 

03.304 Omega HH-25 352 352 5.3 

Reference Barometer 

Barometric Pres. Reading 

03.400 Barometer 29.44 29.43 

Performed By: AJD 

81 
TYPE "S" PITOT TUBE CALffiRATION FORM 

Date: 12/2812007 Specifications: 

Calibrator: JAL A.) Pitot tube assembly must be level. E3 

B.) Ifpitot tube is damaged explain under comments section. Jir C.) Z =A Sin y (<0.125) and W =A Sin 9 (<0.03125) 

D.) ex <10° and~ <5° .. _ .... 

Pitot Tubes Attached to Probes 

I.D. Length al0 a20 plo pzo yo eo A, ln. Z,in. W,in. PA,in. PB,in. Dt, in. 

03.118 2' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.965 0.000 0.00000 0.483 0.482 0.370 

03.119 2' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.370 

03.1013' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.965 0.000 0.00000 0.483 0.482 0.372 

03.102 3' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0:482 0.372 

03.103 3' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.371 

03.104 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.372 

03.105 3' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.936 0.000 0.00000 0.468 0.468 0.371 

07.128 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.962 0.017 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.372 

07.129 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.371 

03.106 5' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.935 0.000 0.00000 0.468 0.467 0.372 

03.107 5' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.372 

03.108 5' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.933 0.000 0.00000 0.467 0.466 0.373 

03.109 5' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.960 0.000 0.00000 0.480 0.480 0.373 

03.110 5' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.931 0.000 0.00000 0.466 0.465 0.372 

03.111 7' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 

03.112 7' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.933 0.000 0.00000 0.467 0.466 0.373 

03.114 7' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.962' 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.371 

03.115 7' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.371 

03.113 8' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.934 0.000 0.00000 0.467 0.467 0.371 

06.12210' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 

06.12310' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.373 

03.11612' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.371 

03.11712' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.372 

07.12415' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 

07.12515' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.962 0.000 0.00000 0.481 0.481 0.372 

07.12615' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 

07.12715' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.372 

Individual Pitot Tubes 

03.150 1' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.630 0.000 0.00000 0.315 0.315 0.250 

03.1511' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.631 0.000 0.00000 0.316 0.315 0.251 

03.152 3' 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.373 

03.153 3' 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.373 

03.154 7' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.373 

03.15510' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.480 0.480 0.373 

05.156 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.630 0.000 0.00000 0.315 0.315 0.251 

05.157 7' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.602 0.000 0.00000 0.301 0.301 0.251 

05.15810' . 0.0 0.0 o.e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.632 0.000 0.00000 0.316 0.316 0.250 

05.159 6' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.632 0.000 0.00000 0.316 0.314 0.250 

08.175 3' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.964 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.482 0.372 

08.176 6' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.965 0.000 0.00000 0.483 0.482 0.374 

08.17710' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.963 0.000 0.00000 0.482 0.481 0.373 

Comments: Pitot Tubes Required Only Minor Maintenance & Reconditioning 

82 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALffiRATION FORM 

THERMOC011.PLES 

Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature 

Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.21 

Date: 12/28/07 Reference Instrument Serial No.; 14-995-5E 

Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 73 

Calibrated By: JAL/JAB 

Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentiometer Difference 

IDNo. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation 

Degrees F Degrees F Percent,% 

Omega BH-25 KF Dry Bulb 

03.301 1 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 

2 Water Bath 144 144 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 325 326 -0.13 

Omega HH-25 KF Wet Bulb 

03.301 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 

2 Water Bath 144 145 -0.17 

3 Oil Bath 325 325 0.00 

Omega HH-25 KF Dry Bulb 

03.302 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 

2 Water Bath 144 146 -0.33 

3 Oil Bath 325 325 0.00 

Omega HH-25 KF Wet Bulb 

03.302 1 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 

2 Water Bath 144 144 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 325 326 -0.13 

Omega HH·25 KF Dry Bulb 

03.303 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 

2 Water Bath 144 145 -0.17 

3 Oil Bath 325 324 0.13 

Omega HH-25 KF Dry Bulb 

03.303 1 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 

2 Water Bath 144 145 -0.17 

3 Oil Bath 325 326 -0.13 

Omega BH-25 KF Dry Bulb 

03.304 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 

2 Water Bath 144 144 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 325 325 0.00 

. Omega HE:I-25 KF Dry Bulb 

03.304 1 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 

2 Water Bath 144 145 -0.17 

3 Oil Bath 325 326 -0.13 

--------------..... ------------------------.... -------------------------.. -·--............... --------------------------"--.............. _______ .. Source = Type of calibration system used. 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F + 460) ·(Test Temp. Deg. F + 460) 

·-~--------------------------------·---------··-----·--------------·-·-:- X I 00 = <1.5% 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F + 460 

83 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

THERMOCOUPLES TolumC4: +f. 1.5% o£ Absolute TCTIIptralUrc 

B~c Prwu:c, In. H;: 29.21 

Dale! 12/21107 Rcfcrm=Icstruznw Serial No.: 14·993-5! 

Amblcat Tcmperalllft, Des. F: 74 

Cllllbrall:dBy: JALIIJJJ 

RefcrtACt Tbumoc:oup!e Temperature 

TbermGcouple, Rercre~~ce Tbermometcr Potmtlomuer Difference 

mNo. Poll! I Sour co Temperature Tcmperatun Calculatloo 

DecrccsF De1recsF Puce~~t.% 

UmbWcal Adaptor Ill 

03..201 I Warulblh 40 40 0.00 

2 W&ttrBalh 74 75 .0.19 

3 Wr.~~:rBalh 125 114 0.17 

UmhWcal Adapter Nl 

03.201 1 WatctBalh 40 40 0.00 

2 WaurBalb 74 74 0.00 

3 WaterBalh 125 124 0.17 

UmbWcal Adapter 113 

03.203 1 WattrBath 40 39 0.20 

2 W&terBatt. 74 73 0.19 

l W&terBIIth 125 124 0.17 

timbWcal Adaptor 64 

Ol.204 1 Wat=rBillb 40 40 0.00 

2 Wat=rBath 74 74 o.oo 3 WaterB.llb 125 124 0.17 

UmbiUeal Adaptor 115 

03.105 1 Water Bath 40 40 o.oo 2 W&terBilh 74 74 o.oo 3 WattrBilh llS 125 o.ao Umbilical Adaptor liS 

03.206 1 Water Bath 40 40 0.00 

2 WatuBalh 74 74 0.00 

3 Water Bath 125 124 Q.17 

Umblllelll Adaptor N7 

03.207 1 WatctBatll 40 40 0.00 

2 Water Balli 74 ?S .0.19 

3 WoterBilh 125 125 0.00 

Umblllcal Adaptor !Ia 

03.201 1 WotcrBalh .co .co 0,00 

2 WDt=rBath 74 74 O,ClCl 

l Wr.~~:rB111h 12S 125 o.co UmbUlcal Adaptor N9 

06.20P 1 WawBtth 40 40 0.00 

2 Water Bath 74 73 0.19 

3 Water Bath 12S 124 0.11 

Umbilical Adaptor 1110 

06..210 l W~&tBalh 40 oCC 0,00 

2 WaterBalh 74 73 0.19 

3 Wat=rBalh ll5 ll5 0,00 

Umbilical Adcptor 1111 

06.211 I WatcrBtth 40 40 0.00 

2 Water Bath 74 75 ..0.19 

3 w~rBalh 125 126 ..0.17 

UmbDJcal Adaptor 1112 07.212 I WatarBalh 40 39 0,20 

2 WaurBa.tb 74 73 0.19 

3 WatarBitb 1l5 125 0.00 

Umbllleal Adaptor 1113 

07.213 I Wa!crBith 40 40 0.00 

2 Water Bath 74 73 0.19 

3 W&tetBa:h ll.S 125 o.oo UmbWcal Adaptor 1114 

07,214 I WawBitb 40 40 0,00 

2 WawBalb 74 74 0.00 

3 Wtt:rBalb l2S ll.S O.GO 

UmbWtal Adapter N15 

07.215 1 WatcrBalh 40 40 O.DD 

2 Watc:Bath 74 75 ..0,1!1 

3 WuuBa.tb 12S 12.5 o.oo UmbWcd Adaptor 1116 

07.216 l WattrB.llb <10 40 o.oo 2 Water Bath 74 ?S ..0.1!.1 

3 Water Bath ll.S ll.S o.oo UmhWC&I Adaptor 1117 

08.217 I WatetBalh 40 40 0,00 

2 WmrBa.lh 74 75 .0,151 

3 WatuDath ll.S 125 0.00 

Umbilical Adaptor 1#18 

OB.lla 1 Water Bath 40 40 0.00 

2 Watl!fBath 74 75 .C.l!l 

3 Water Bath 12S 125 o.oo Umbilical Adaptor IIVOST 1 

03.209 1 WatcrB&th 40 40 0.00 

2 Water Bath 74 ··74 0.00 

l Water Beth 12S 124 0.17 

Umb!Utal Adaptor IIVOST 2 

03.210 1 WatarBalh 40 40 0.00 

2 Wiler Bath 74 73 0.19 

3 W&tuBath 125 124 O.J? 

SoutCO • Type or callbntioo sy~tcmused. 0 

Tcmperalllro Di:fl'tr== Calcubliou: A (&£ Temp. Dcg. P + 4~0) • (Test Temp. Dc.g. P + 460) X 100•<1.5% 

Rtt TCIIIp. Des. F + ¢60 

84 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

THERMOCOUPLES 

Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature I Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.21 

Date: 12/28/07 Reference Instrument Serial No.: 14-995-5E 

Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 74 

Calibrated By: J~/JAB 

-----------·--·-.. ·-····· .. ·----....................... ______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentiometer Difference 

IDNo. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation 

Degrees F Degrees F Percent,% 

3' Pitot 

05.156 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 

2 Water Bath 145 145 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 322 323 -0.13 

7' Pitot 

05.157 Water Bath 75 75 0.00 

2 Water Bath 145 146 -0.17 

3 Oil Bath 322 324 -0.26 

10' Pitot 

05.158 1 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 

2 Water Bath 145 144 0.17 

3 Oil Bath 322 321 0.13 

7' Pitot 

05.159 Water Bath 75 74 0.19 

2 Water Bath 145 146 -0.17 

3 Oil Bath 322 347 -3.20 

3' Pitot 

08.175 1 Water Bath 73 73 0.00 

2 Water Bath 156 156 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 315 316 -0.13 

6' Pitot 

08.176 Water Bath 73 73 0.00 

2 Water Bath 156 156 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 315 314 0.13 

10' Pitot 

08.177 Water Bath 73 73 0.00 

2 Water Bath 156 155 0.16 

3 Oil Bath 315 315 0.00 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F + 460) - (Test Temp. Deg. F + 460) 

--------·-··--·---------·-------------------------------·-······-····--· X 100 = <1. 5% 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F + 460 

85 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALffiRATION FOR.iVI 

THERMOCOUPLES 

Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature 

Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.19 

Date: 12/27/07 Reference Instrument Serial No.: 14-995-5E 

Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 74 

Calibrated By: JAL 

Thermocouple Reference 

ID No. Point Source 

DGM Inlet/Outlet 

03.001 1 

(2010-IV) 2 

DGM Inlet/Outlet 

03.002 

(2010-V) 

DGM Inlet/Outlet 

03.004 

(C-5000-1) 

DGM Inlet/Outlet 

03.005 

(C-5000-2) 

DGM Inlet/Outlet 

07.338 

(C-5000-3) 

DGM Inlet/Outlet 

3 

1 

2 

3 

1 

2 

3 

1 

2 

3 

1 

2 

3 

03.003 1 

(RAC) 2 

3 

DGM Outlet 

03.003 1 

(RAC) 2 

3 

DGM Inlet/Outlet 

03.006 1 

VOST-1 2 

3 

DGM Inlet/Outlet 

03.007 1 

VOST-2 2 

3 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water. Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Water Bath 

Source = Type of calibration system used. 

Reference 

Thermometer 

Temperature 

Degrees F 

40 

73 

120 

40 

73 

120 

40 

73 

120 

40 

72 

122 

42 

75 

120 

40 

72 

122 

40 

72 

122 

40 

72 

122 

40 

72 

122 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F + 460) - (Test Temp. beg. F + 460) 

Thermocouple 

Potentiometer 

Temperature 

Degrees F 

40 

72 

120 

40 

73 

121 

40 

72 

119 

40 

72 

121 

42 

76 

121 

41 

72 

121 

40 

72 

121 

41 

.72 

122 

41 

73 

123 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- X 100 ""' <1.5% 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F + 460 

Temperature 

Difference 

Calculation 

Percent,% 

0.00 

0.19 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

-0.17 

0.00 

0.19 

0.17 

0.00 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

-0.19 

-0.17 

-0.20 

0.00 

0.17 

0.00 

0.00 

0.17 

-0.20 

0.00 

0.00 

-0.20 

-0.19 

-0.17 

D 

A .. _ .... 

86 
Technical Information Bulletin D-453-5/2005 Page lof2 

453 

National 

Weather 

Service 

Type 

PRI co 

Fortin type mercurial 

Barometers 

Revised 5/2005 

Manufac-tured by 

PRINCO·IN·STRUMENTS·, INC. 

1020 Industrial B-lvd. 

Southampton, Pa. 189·66·-4095 

U.S.A. 

w.·eb Site: www.princoinstruments.com 

Tel~phone:· 215 355-1500 

Fax.: .215 355-7766 

87 
Technical Information Bulletin D-453-5/2005 Page 2of2 

Technical Information on Scales and Mercury Measurement 

Each scale Is set at the factory by comparison with a scale cert!fled by the Nationallnstltute of Standards 

and Technology (N.I.S.T.)·. They read the local station pressure VJ!thout the necessity of correcting for capillary 

depression. 

The standard temperature forthe density 9f mercury Is 32•F or Q·c. Mercury expands, becoming less 

dense, with Increasing temperature. The effect of the. expansion of mercury Is about 10 times. as great as that 

of the expansion of the brass and scales .. Since th.e barometer will pro.bably not'be near32°F or ooc, for high 

accuracy It Is importapt to apply the terpperature ccirrectlof1 to reduce your reading to mercury at standard 

temperature. The standard·.temperature for English scales Is 62°F and that for metric scales Is a· c. This 

means that an English scale will appear contracted relative to. a metric scale, when "Viewed at the same 

temperature, without the temperature correction applied·. If It Is desired to conve.rt an English reading to a 

metric reading; or vice vers~, always apply the temperature correction(s) In the. proper system(s),.before. 

making the conversion. The barometer barrel is made of brass. The barometer scale has a coefficient of 

thennal expansiQn ~ssenUally equal to that of brass. Because standard materlals.are used, s~an~ard 

combin.ed temperature correction tables, such as Tables 4 and 5; and equatlons,·glv.en below, may be used. 

The reading of the barometer is also affected by gravity (Vvfllch Is affected by the oblate spheroid shape of· 

the earth) and the centrifugal force ofthe rotation of the earth, all of which vary with·Jatltude. Tlie combined 

gravity correction Is generally smaller than the temperature correction. At. a given latltudei the· multiplier for 

gravity. correction will be a cont?tant. Standard gravity corrections are given In Tables 6 arid 7, or you can 

compute.the multiplier for gravity correction for your exact latitude using-the equation glve.n below. Our MS 

Excel2000 Spreadsheet for Automatic Barometer CQrr~ctlons (Table 1) computes all ofth~ corrections 

exactly. · 

Certification of Traceability and Accuracy 

All PRINCO Fortin type mercurial barometers, Models '45j, 45.3X and 469, have scales· which were set 

at the. time of manufacture to a near.zero·correctl<:>n by comparison with a Fortin lype .. mercu~al barometer 

whose scales were calibrated traceable to the National Institute of Standards.& Technology (N.I.S.T.). 

Barometer scales may be read more accurately .than ~he.y_ can be set. For highest a.ccuracy, barometers may· 

be ordered \'.lith, or returned to the factory for,.a Factory Ce.rtiflc~te of Calibration, and the corre.cti.ons 

contained therein applied to each scale's readings. Fortin type· mercurial barometers are accurate·to :1:0.01 

Inches of mercury, :1:0.2 mm ofmer.cu·ry, or ±0.3 mb, When carefully set and· read, and ilfter the certificate, 

temperature, and gravity corrections have been ~pplled. The thennometer on the barometer is accurate to 

±1°F/±0.5°C, lfthe barometer Is not abused in any way, it should never go out of calibration. 

References 

1. Letestu, S., "International Meteorological Tables", World Meteorological Organization, WMO-No. 

118.TP.94, Geneva, S\\oitzerland, 1966, with amendments through July 1973. 

2. List, Robert J., "Smithsonian Meteorological Tables", Srnlthsonian Miscellaneous .Collections, Vol. 114", 

Publication 4014, Smithsonian Institution Pr.ess, ·sill revised edition .1949, 51h reprint 1.97·1. 

3. ~~Manual ofBarometryt', (WBAN), Volume 1, First Edltlon, U.S. Department ofC.ommer.ce, Weather 

Bureau, Washington, D.c·., 1.963. 

sa 
Date: 8/28/2007 

Certificate#: 13404 

LABORATORY 

ACCREDITATION 

; BUREAU 

ACC'RE!DfTED 

lNDUSTRIAL SCALE COMPANY 

12828A SUNRISE LANE 

OAKBORO. NC 28129/ PH# 704 485-4135 

QC?:!l_~ration Date.: ____ • __ 8/2~.:..::;;/2;.;;:0..;:.07.:_.._. ________ _ 

cart-# L11SS·i C.11lbratlon 

INTEGRITY AIR MONJTORING,JNC 

9220 BEATTIES FORD RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078~8 

JAMES A LEWIS 704-398-1119 

~ext Calipration Due D~te: 8/28/2008 Temperaturef%RH 77 F I %48 

Calibration Interval: 1 YEARS Recieved Condition: GOOD ~~~~~~~~~~~~--~------------·------..__ ___ .__ __ _ Gage ~~--- 5039P ----- Manufacturer: FISHER 

Serial Number 5039P Performed By: C. HONEY 

Model Number 14-99_5-SE Procedure: CP-004 

Gage Type: THERMOMETER Calibration Result PASS 

Gage Description: 20 TO 500 X 2 DEGREES F THERMOMETER 

Department: 

1 98.0 96.0 1 00.0 97.0 97.0 

~--··-·---- 197.0 195.0 199.0 197.0 197.0 

3 297.0 295.0 299.0 297.0 297.0 i_. ____________ _ 

~----

397.0__:_ ___ ;;.;39:;.;:5;.:.;.0;._ ___ __::3:..:9.::..9·:.::::0 _____ ___;3:;.;:9~7.:;::.0;.._ 

495.0 4'93.0 497.Q. 495.0 

397.0 

495.0 

INDUSTRIAL SCALe ASI·OD8-069A PSYCH~OMETeR 30 TO 85% RH200S1107160031 11/7/2006 11/7/2007 

INDUSTRIAL-~- ISc-RTD-1 OTO 1110 DEGReES F RTD PRC200S12300959180000 12/30/2006 12130/2007 

This certificate may not be copied. exoept In full, without written oonsent of Industrial Scale Company. /no. Results listed relate only to the Hems 

that were tested and or oalibrated. Suitability or determination of status of the Instrument for 11 given app//cetion Is the sole responsibility of the user. 

A cored/ted calibmtlons (Ire per the Scope of Acoredltotlon. Industrial Scale Company, Inc. maintains ll quaflty system that meets or eKceeds tho 

requlremonts setforth In the following documents: /SO/lEO 17025: 2005(E). ANSUNCSL Z540·1 and ISO 10012-1. All reference standard$ used 

by this company are tracesb/o to N/ST, fundamental or natural constants or by accepted ratio metric or comparative techniques. Tolerance Omits 

listed are the manufacturer's published from reoongnlzed sources for the listed Instrument, or as specmed by the customer. Statements of verdicts 

or status are based on these limits without the oa/ou!Btlon of each measurement uncertB!nly. 

AJdhorlzod Slgnsture: r!Ja.e L ,#Cl"11J( Oslo Propsrod: 8'- ;;. g'- c:J J 

89 
Purchase Ordtr #: '9308 

Cllont: Precision Weighing Inc Address: Stanley R Hall 

111 Mcoco Bridge Rd 

Clly,& Slato: Taylors, SC 29687 

Dolo Rocolvod: OS DEC 2007 

Dato Callbratod: 06 DEC 2007 to 07 DEC 2007 

Temperature Range: 20.8610 21.811"C 

Prouure Range: 727.6to 730.~ mmHo 

RotAtive Humidity Range: 4810 50fo 

Air Density: 1.1<108 to 1.1<479 mgtcm• ~ lndlcatca now weiAbt Traceable Report fl: 1365004A QD Indicates As Found >= To! HIST Certlncate tl: 822/272801-08 822127 4Da 1.()6 Tested By: 12 

Procedure: Modified SubsUtuUon (WIOS-0023) 

Contractor Raq Recall Dalo: 12131/0B 

Primary Standard Calibration Data: 11103106 Duo: 11/03110 

Description of Wolghts: 1 mg-200g Polish ad Kit, Cla.ss "1", SIN P927 

Although thoro 1111 two NIST n~o~mbcrs, 

ono or bolh m•y apply. 

C2!l~!!!JIIS!nBI Mass !;;orr Unc. StDndard Set Used Assumod 

Nominal Alii Found As Loft K=2 Tot. Balnnco Callbralocl/due Donslty 

Value I d. (mg) (mg) (mg) (ms;) Used MM·DD·YYIMM•DD•YY . (glcm•) 

1 mg 0.00512 0.00512 0.00085 0.010 5010 K594Q 09~14-07/12~14·07 7.95 

2 mg 0.00507 0.00507 «1.00073 0.010 5010 K5940 09-14-07/12~14·07 7.95 

5 mg 0.00304 0.00304 -90.00069 0.010 5010 K5940 09-14-07/12·14·07 7.95 

10 mg 0.00234 0.00234 0.00074 0.010 5010 K594Q 09-14-07/12-14-07 7.95 

10 mg 0.00104 0.00104 0.00074 0.010 5010 K594Q 09-1+07/12-14·07 7.95 

20 mg 0.00066 0.00065 0.00067 0.010 5010 1<5940 09-14-07/12-14-07 7.95 

30 mg 0.00231 . 0.00231 0.00078 0.010 5010 K5940 09-1+07112-14·07 7.95 

so mg 0.00241 0.00241 0.00091 0.010 5010 K5940 09-14-07/1 ?·14~07 7.95 

100 mg -0.0015 ·0.0015 0.0011 0.010 5010 K5940 09·14-07/12-14·07 7.95 

200 mg 0.00227 0.00227 0.00094 0.010 5010 K594Q 09·1 +07/12·14-07 7.95 

300 m'g -0.0043 -0.0043 0.0011 0.010 5010 K594Q 09·14-07/12·14-07 .7.95 

500 mg ·0.0014 ·0.0014 0.0012 0.010 5010 K594Q 09·14·07 /12-14-07 7.95 

1 g 0.0022 0.0022 0.0020 0.034 5010 K5940 09-14-07/12·14·07 7.95 

2 g -0.0034 -0.0034 0.0026 0.034 5010 KS940 09·1+07/12-14-07 7.95 

3 g ·0.0163 -0.0163 0.0036 0.034 5010 K5940 09·14·07/12-14·07 7.95 

5 g 0.0062 0.0062 0.0056 0.034 5010 K5940 09-14-07/12-14-07 7.95 

10 g ·0.021 -0.021 0.013 0.050 6760 K5940 09-14·07/12-14·07 7.95 

20 g 0.008 0.008 0.012 0.074 6760 K5940 09·14·07/12-14·07 7.95 

30 g ·0.055 0.041 !XI 0.021 6.074 9730 K5940 09·14·07/12-14·07 7.95 

50 g ·0.099 0,067 [g) 0.027 0.12 9730 K594Q 09-14~07/12·14·07 7.95 

100 g ·0.104 -0.104 0.061 0.25 9730 K5940 09·14·0 7/12-14-07 7.95 

Cheek '1111111 your 1ocDI st11to ogancy ror col'iliiCauon 01 comi)CinCG on t:GIIIOIOI"IradC llamD. 

Prepared By: 

MM*M&iiA& §f M fi9iiB 

RICELAJKE"' 

PRECISION SOlUTIONS 

230 West Coleman Streol • Rlco Lake, Wlll~868 • USA 

TEL: 715-234·0171 • FAX: 716·234·6967 

Page 1 of 2 pages 

~~ antli\Oti(ob loch 

Thl1l ropor\ Is not to bo usod to ciNm PI'OCb:loncoraament b)' Rico LokO Wlllgh!ng Systomr or ony ogoney ollho U.S. Govornmont. This docvmontahall not bo raproducod, oxccpl !n IUU, wUhouttno written cpprowt ol Rico I.Dko Wolg~ Syatems' Motrolo(w l.llbOiatory. The ar:sovo unco.1n1nlv coas not lnclldo o c:omocnenl for mliOmallc orooariv or hllfldllna anct uao. 

90 
'chase Ord11r #: 

,..,,ont; 

Address: 

Clly & Stato: 

Date Rocolved: 

Date Callbrolod: 

Temperature Range: 

PttS$urc Rango: 

Relative Humidity Range: 

Air Density: 

Traccablo Roport fl: 

NIST Cortlncato #: 

9308 

Proc:Jslon Weighing Inc 

Stanley R Hall 

111 Meoco Bridge Rd 

Taylon. SC 29697 

05 DEC2007 

06 DEC 2007 to 07 DEC 2007 

20.86 to 21.BB •c 

727.6 to 730.3 mmHg 

481o50% 

1.14011 1o 1.1479 mglcm» 

1365004A 

8221272BD1.06 8221274081.08 

Although thoro aro two NIST numbars, ono or both may apply. 

Nominal 

Valu11 

200g 

ld. 

Conyantlonal Mass Corr. 

As Found As L.oft 

(mg) (mg) 

0.248 0.246 

Unc. 

K=2 

(mg) 

0.060 

ToJ, 

(mg} 

0.50 

:·· 

~ Indicate• new wvlllhl 

llD lndlcatu As Found >• Tol 

Standard Set Us ad 

Balance Calibrated/duo 

Used MM·DD·YYIMM·DD·YY 

e190 K5940 09-14-07/12·14·07 

Cilock ~en \'01..11' iac:alalolll~~goncy iOi cvltiicaUoli Ol cOii'lP!Iiitlce on lcgaf.ior-tziida ~ems. 

Assumed 

Density 

(glcm') 

7.95 

Prepared By: • 

RICE LAKE .. ·De -·· Page 2 of 2 pages Dated 07 DEC 2007 

PRECISION 

230 Wesl Cola!TWl 

TEL: 

SOLUTIONS 

716·234·9171 

Slloat • Rl:::o Loko, 

• FAX! 

WI 

71!1·234·8987 

54868 

"toiiUMD 

• USA &~- This ropon 13 nolto Do uDCCSio claim PIO<Iuc:t endanlcmenl by Rico l.elco Weighing Svstoms or O.'ll' OGOI'ICY ollhG u.s. Govornmont. 

This doeumont Jhall not bCiroptOCiuCOCI, e=ep~ln lui, wllhou1 tho ¥~rillcn approv~ al AJco l.llko Wa~ling Systems· Molrology Labora\o,ry. 

Tho a.bOYO Ul11:011alniY clooa nollnoludO II oomootiCnt lOt IMGI1Itllc IVODIVIY or hMd51'10 end \1511. 

91 
J.?!·er::.is7.i.in .. T't -87~0 h ·i.nJq ...... ,_ 

1949 E,.:.atlS Road 

Cru.-y, North Carolina 27513 

(919) 678~t'J-0?'7 

Weight Set - Verification Certificate 

Manufacturer: Mettler Weight Set Class: s 

Balance: AE2oo Serial Number: SV-22470 

Serial Number. N6187(5 Verification Date: 12-Jun-oa 

Balance Cal. Date: June 12. 2008 Vorlficntion Due date: Jun~9 

NIST Traceable#: Pg2.7 Customer Name: Integrity Air 

Standards Cal. Date: 06-Dec-07 Contact Name: Paul Jenkins 

Standards Due Date: December-aS Location: Lab 

Location Type&Class Serial# l Nominal Value(g) I Actual Value(g) 

Lab Stainless Steel s SV-22470 0.001 0.0009 

Lab Stainless Steel s SV-22470 0.002 o.oox~t 

Lab Stainless Steel s SV-2~470 0.003 0.0031 

Lab Stainless Steel s SV-22470 o.oos 0.0050 

Lab Stainless Steel s SV-22470 0.01 0.0100 

Lab Stainless Steel s SV-22470 0.02 0.0200 

Lab Stainless Steel s SV-22470 0.0_3 0.0300 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 o.os o.osoo 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 0.1 0.1000 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22.470 0.2 0.2000 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 0.3 0.3000 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 o.s o.sooo 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 1 1.0000 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 2 2.0000 

lab Stainless Steel S S\7-22470 3 3.oooo 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 5 s.oooo 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 10 10.0000 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 20 20.0001 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 30 30.0004 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 50 50.0004 

Lab Stainless Steel S SV-22470 100 lOO.OOU 

Technician: ~A1Jl.E 'I R. II, LL Date: 12-June-08 

Customer: Date: 

92 
1949 Evans Road 

Cary, North Carolina 27513 

Phone: (919) 678-0077 tlr Fax: (919) 678-0075 

Email: pweighing@aol.com 

BALANCE CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION 

Calibration Date: 12 Jun 08 Calibration due date: Jun 09 SOP: 2000 

Balance ID #: N-A Type/Model: Mettler AE 200 S/N: N61876 

Dept: Lab Room Number: 1 Tolerance +/- : 

I Weight set ID# I NIST Test Number I Cal Date I Cal Due I 

P927 1365004A 06 Dec 07 Dec08 

Weight Before Cal Readings Difference After Cal Readings Difference Tolerances 

Standard fal ( g ) { g ) ( g } ( g ) +1- (g) 

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 

0.2 0.2000 0.0000 0.2000 0.0000 0.0002 

1 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0010 

10 9.9998 -0.0002 10.0000 0.0000 0.0100 

50 49.9993 -0.0007 50.0000 0.0000 0.0500 

200 199.9969 . -0.0031 200.0000 0.0000 0.2000 

Before Calibration Readings: After Calibration Readings: 

·Comments: 

In Tolerance: 418 

Out of Tolerance: C) 

N/A: C) 

In Tolerance: 48 

Out of Tolerance: C) 

N/A: C) 

This certifies that the balance listed above has been serviced and calibrated to manufacturer 

spec[fications and/or Precision Weighing Standard Operating Procedures with welghts traceable 

to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 

0.1% 

Precision Weighing Technician Customer Signature (Review) 

12 Jun 08 

Date of Service Date of Review 

93 
1949 Evans Road 

Cary, North Carolina ~7513 

Phone: (919) 678-0077 " Fax: (919) 678-0075 

Email: pweighing@aol.com 

BALANCE CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION 

Calibration Date: 12 Jun 08 Calibration due date: Jun 09 SOP: 2000 

Balance ID #: N-A Type/Model: Mettler AC 1 00 S/N: C32593 

Dept: Lab Room Number: 1 Tolerance+/·: 

Weight set ID# NIST Test Number Cal Date Cal Due 

P927 1365004A 06 Dec 07 Dec08 

Weight Before Cal Readings Difference After Cal Readings Difference Tolerances 

Standard ta) ( g ) ( g ) ( g ) { g ) +1- (g) 

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0~0000 

0.2 0.2000 0.0000 0.2000 0.0000 0.0002 

1 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0010 

5 5.0001 0.0001 5.0000 0.0000 0.0050 

10 10.0001 0.0001 10.0000 0.0000 0.0100 

50 50.0009 0.0009 50.0000 0.0000 0.0500 

Before Calibration Readings: After Calibration Readings: 

In Tolerance: In Tolerance: 

Out of Tolerance: Out of Tolerance: 

N/A: N/A: 

Comments: 

This certifies that the balance listed above has been serviced and calibrated to manufacturer 

specifications and/or Precision Weighing Standard Operating Procedures with weights traceable 

to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 

0.1 o/o 

Precision Weighing Technician Customer Signature (Review) 

12 Jun 08 

Date of Service Date of Review 

94 
APPENDIX5 

PRODUCTION DOCUMENTATION 

95 
Florim USA Inc. 

Stack Testing 

November 18,2008 

Product· Sedona Cedar 

Size M 12x12 

Cycle Time • 50 minutes 

Beginning weight· 2092.2 grams 

Run# Start Time Stop Time 

1 8:38 8:43 

2 10:04 10:09 

3 11:19 11:24 

Average 

Pieces/Row Row/5 minutes Pieces/minute Weight/piece (lb) Tile throuhgout 

6 43 

(lb/hr) 

51.6 4.61 

6 

14,267.51 

44 52.8 4.61 

6 

14 599.32 

41 49.2 4.61 13,603.91 

14,156.91 

96 
Run 

1 

2 

3 

Florlm USA Inc. 

Stack Testing 

November 18, 2008 

Pressure Drop Readings 

Presure Drop 

Time Reading (inches of 

water) 

8:21 1.8 

8:36 1.8 

8:51 1.8 

9:06 1.8 

9:21 1.8 

9:45 1.8 

10:00 1.8 

10:15 1.8 

10:30 1.8 

10:45 1.8 

11:12 1.8 

11:27 1.8 

11:42 1.8 

11:57 1.8 

12:12 1.8 

97