alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 249/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 249 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5731 July 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 249

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5731 July 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 249/01 | Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 249/01

Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 249/02 | Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/508/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 826/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 29 |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 249/03 | Euro exchange rates | 31 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2014/C 249/02

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2014/508/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 826/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

29

European Commission

2014/C 249/03

Euro exchange rates

31

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 249/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7334 — Oracle/MICROS) (1) | 32 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 249/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7334 — Oracle/MICROS) (1)

32

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
___________

No. 96-1970

___________

Shaun Duggins, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Tom William Pridy, individually *

and as an employee of the *

Missouri Department of Revenue; *

Tom Ley, individually and as an * [UNPUBLISHED]

employee of the Missouri *

Department of Revenue, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 10, 1996

 Filed: December 13, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Shaun Duggins appeals the district court's dismissal in part

and grant of summary judgment in part in favor of the defendants in

Duggins's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the

record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the district

court's decisions were clearly correct and an extended discussion

on our part is not warranted. We thus affirm the district court.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:
-2-

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                          51,310
<SECURITIES>                                    96,571
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,485
<INVENTORY>                                     21,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               263,905
<PP&E>                                          33,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,606
<BONDS>                                         25,821
<COMMON>                                           213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,390
<SALES>                                        103,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,820
<CGS>                                           39,791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,564
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (313)
<INVENTORY>                                     65,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,238
<PP&E>                                         107,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                (42,950)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,255
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,488
<SALES>                                         37,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,479
<CGS>                                           26,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,256)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 8.1





Organizational
Chart







PANTHERA
      EXPLORATION INC.
      (formerly Amera Resources Corporation)
      (Vancouver, British Columbia)
      (Registered in B.C. and a foreign entity registered in Argentina)Amera
      Argentina 
      Branch100%100%100%Amera Resources Chile Sociedad
    Contractual Minera (Chile) May 2005Amera Resources 
    (US) Inc.
    (Nevada)
    February 2005Amera Resources
    (BVI) Inc.
    (BVI)
    January 10, 2007100%Rescursos de los Andes
    S.A.C
    (Peru)
    September 2004
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
      PokerTek, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-129181) of our report dated January
      20,
      2007, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31, 2006, on the balance sheets of PokerTek, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and
      2005, and the related statements of operations, shareholder’s equity (deficit)
      and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and
      December 31, 2004.







/s/
                McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
              
              Charlotte,
                North Carolina
              March
                26, 2007
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-47;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
Cause No. DC-12-02620 

MARY FRANCES HUGHES, ET AL 

Plaintiff, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

vs. 

160TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

RHONDA HUGHES MONTEE, ET AL, 

Defendants. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

Mary Frances Hughes, individually and on behalf of Hughes Family Funeral Home, Inc. and 

Crown Hill Memorial Park and Mausoleum, Inc., Plaintiffs herein, and give notice of their intent to 

appeal the Judgment entered by the 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County on November 6, 2014. 

This appeal is taken to the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas, Texas. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS C. BARRON 

P.O. Box 141323 

Dallas, Texas 75214 

Phone No. 214-855-6631 

Facsimile: 214-855-6633 

tbarron@baronlawfirm.com 

By: IS/ Thomas C. Barron 

Thomas C. Barron 

State Bar No. 01821290 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This certifies that on February 2, 2015, I have served a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

instrument on all attorneys of record in the manner indicated below. 

VIA email 

Mark J. Carroll 

IS/ Thomas C. Barron 

Thomas C. Barron 

ACCEPTED

05-15-00129-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEAL

DALLAS, TEXAS

2/2/2015 9:35:34 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

05-15-00129-CV

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/2/2015 9:35:34 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 266 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge as 

the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 266 ES

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE NOXUBEE NATIONAL 

2 WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Noxubee National Wildlife 

4 Refuge, located in the State of Mississippi, is redesignated 

5 as the ‘‘Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Ref6 uge’’. 

7 (b) BOUNDARY REVISION.—Nothing in this Act pre8 vents the Secretary of the Interior from making adjust9 ments to the boundaries of the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee 

10 National Wildlife Refuge (referred to in this section as the 

11 ‘‘Refuge’’), as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, 

12 to carry out the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge 

13 System in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge 

14 System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et 

15 seq.) and any other applicable authority. 

16 (c) ADDITION OF LAND.—Nothing in this Act pre17 vents the Secretary of the Interior from adding to the Ref18 uge new land or parcels of the National Wildlife Refuge 

19 System, as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, to 

20 carry out the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge Sys21 tem in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge Sys22 tem Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) 

23 and any other applicable authority. 

24 (d) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any statute, 

25 rule, regulation, executive order, publication, map, paper, 

26 or other document of the United States to the Noxubee 
3 

†S 266 ES

1 National Wildlife Refuge is deemed to refer to the Sam 

2 D. Hamilton Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge. 

Passed the Senate February 17, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 266 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the Noxubee National Wildlife RefWildlife Refuge. uge as the Sam D. Hamilton Noxubee National
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2439 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on potassium sorbate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on potassium 

sorbate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POTASSIUM SORBATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.24 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 potassium sorbate) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2439 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 99-40644

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40644

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERMELINDA RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-98-CR-481-01

--------------------

April 7, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ermelinda

Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Rodriguez did not file a response to counsel’s motion to

withdraw. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| By:                /s/ Colin Hendrick                  |
| Colin                Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer |
| SmartMetric,                Inc.                       |
| October                11, 2005                   |
# Official Journal L 32/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 32 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5231 January 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 32

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5231 January 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Directive 2008/126/EC of 19 December 2008 amending Directive 2006/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down technical requirements for inland waterway vessels | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Directive 2008/126/EC of 19 December 2008 amending Directive 2006/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down technical requirements for inland waterway vessels

1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under 

EO12866/13563 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review.

1

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Proposed Rule

Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources

RIN 2060-AS30

General Comments:

1. Reviewer recommends that the EPA solicit comment on whether it should require quarterly 

monitoring of fugitive emissions for all facilities (well pads, gathering and boosting stations, 

transmission compressor stations) regardless of percentage of components detected as having 

fugitive emissions. 

EPA RESPONSE: 

EPA agrees and is soliciting comment on the following: 

- “We solicit comment on the appropriateness of the percentage of emission reduction level 

that can be reasonably expected to be achieved with quarterly, semiannual, and annual 

monitoring program frequencies.” 

- “We solicit comment on this approach, including the percentage used to adjust the 

monitoring frequency. We also solicit comment on the appropriateness of performance 

based monitoring frequencies.” 

2. Reviewer recommends that EPA solicit comment on whether wells that do hydraulic 

refracturing should be required to conduct LDAR or be treated as a modified source 

regardless of whether they do a REC/green completion. Currently, such facilities are exempt 

if they conduct a well completion.

EPA RESPONSE: 

The affected facility status of a “well” for purposes of the well completion requirements is 

separate from the affected facility status of a “well site” for purposes of the fugitive 

emissions requirements. As a result, modification of a “well” is not the same as modification 

of a “well site.” In the proposal, well sites are modified through addition of a new well or by 

fracturing (or refracturing) of an existing well at that site.

3. Reviewer recommends EPA solicit comment whether zero-bleed pneumatic controllers 

should be required in segments that have access to electricity.

EPA RESPONSE: 

EPA agrees with the reviewer and has already incorporated provisions to address this in the 

proposal. The proposal identifies that a constant reliable electrical supply is necessary to run 

the compressor for the system. We identify that for the production, transmission, and storage 

segments electrical service sufficient to power an instrument air system is likely unavailable

(EPA is proposing the installation of low-bleed pneumatic controllers for these segments). 

However, we are requiring the use of instrument air-activated controllers in the processing 

segment where sufficient electric service is likely to be available. Instrument air-activated 
Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under 

EO12866/13563 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review.

2

controllers represent an emission rate of zero for methane. Accordingly, we are proposing a 

methane standard for pneumatic controllers in the processing segment to be a natural gas 

bleed rate of zero. This is the same as the VOC standard for these pneumatic controllers in 

the 2012 NSPS.
Jamie MYERS and Ericka Myers, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Deceased Child, Tyler Myers, and Peyton Myers (their Minor Son) v. Brad M. WELCH, Valentine & Leblanc, LLC ; Security National Insurance Company and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company

NO. 2017-C-2165

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.