alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2680 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2680

 To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing fluopyram and 
                             tebuconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing fluopyram and 
                             tebuconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING FLUOPYRAM AND TEBUCONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Mixtures            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        containing N-{2-                                                   31/2015.......
                        [3-chloro-5-
                        (trifluoromethyl)-
                        2-
                        pyridinyl]ethyl}-
                        a,a,a-trifluoro-o-
                        toluamide
                        (fluopyram) (CAS
                        No. 658066-35-4)
                        and (RS)-1-p-
                        chlorophenyl)-4,4-
                        dimethyl-3-(1H-
                        1,2,4-triazol-1-
                        ylmethyl)pentan-3-
                        ol (tebuconazole)
                        (CAS No. 107534-
                        96-3), including
                        application
                        adjuvants
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3808.91.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,066-01

EX PARTE ROGELIO DELACERDA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1229727 IN THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to thirty five years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Delacerda v. State, 01-09-00972-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.], July 21, 2011). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to timely inform

Applicant of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. 
2

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. The trial court has entered findings

of fact and conclusions of law that Applicant was improperly denied the opportunity to seek

discretionary review. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956

S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-09-000972-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 1229727 from the 174 District Court of Harris th

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of

the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: April 16, 2014

Do not publish
Exhibit 31.4

HORIZON LINES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael T. Avara, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Horizon Lines, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Date: May 26, 2015



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael T. Avara                                
|Michael T. Avara                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2849 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2849

 To suspend temporarily the duty on frit rings composed of dysprosium 
              oxide, dysprosium monosilicate, and mullite.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on frit rings composed of dysprosium 
              oxide, dysprosium monosilicate, and mullite.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRIT RINGS COMPOSED OF DYSPROSIUM OXIDE, DYSPROSIUM 
              MONOSILICATE, AND MULLITE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Frit rings          Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          composed of                                                       12/31/2015
                          dysprosium oxide,
                          dysprosium
                          monosilicate, and
                          mullite (CAS Nos.
                          12161-58-9, 235-
                          295-7, 1302-93-8,
                          215-113-2, 1308-
                          87-8, and 215-164-
                          0) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          8539.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Barbara WATKINS v. Gary HARPER and Laurie Harper

2150887

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Adela RICO, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2216

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 (adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                 |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|November 6, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    RICARDO BERNARDES             
|                 |  |  |  | Ricardo Bernardes                    
|                 |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Finance and
|                 |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2864 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2′-methylenebis [4 methyl 6 tert 

butylphenol]. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2′-methylenebis [4 

methyl 6 tert butylphenol]. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,2′-METHYLENEBIS [4 METHYL 6 TERT BUTYL4 PHENOL]. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,2′-Methylenebis[4 methyl 6 

tert butylphenol] (CAS No. 

119–47–1) (provided for in 

subheading 2907.29.90) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2864 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,027,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       9,676,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,108,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,906,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,108,140
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               847,899
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  562,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,278
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            137,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   137,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
J. 

97euldeuu tu 

Gibbons Pickering 

material facts which constitute the cause of action' for [transactional] 

attorney malpractice when he files or defends a lawsuit occasioned by that 

malpractice, and he 'sustains damage' by assuming the expense, 

inconvenience and risk of having to maintain such litigation, even if he 

wins it." (quoting NRS 11.207(1)), overruled on other grounds by Kopicko v. 

Young, 114 Nev. 1333, 971 P.2d 789 (1998).' 

For the same reasons, the district court properly dismissed 

appellant's breach of fiduciary duty claim, see Stalk v. Mushkin, 125 Nev. 

21, 29-30, 199 P.3d 838, 844 (2009), and appellant's fraud claim, see NRS 

11.190(3)(d). We therefore 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

J. 

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge 

Robert L. Eisenberg, Settlement Judge 

Day R. Williams, Attorney at Law 

Laxalt & Nomura, Ltd./Reno 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

'We are not persuaded by appellant's suggestion that the course of 

action proposed in Kopicko v. Young, 114 Nev. 1333, 1337 n.3, 971 P.2d 

789, 791 n.3 (1998), is unworkable so as to necessitate applying the 

litigation malpractice tolling rule in the transactional malpractice context. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A
Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0042

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2543 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2543

  To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Yellow 131, Fluorescent 
                           Yellow M, Mohawk.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Yellow 131, Fluorescent 
                           Yellow M, Mohawk.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLVENT YELLOW 131, FLUORESCENT YELLOW M, MOHAWK.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Solvent Yellow      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        131, Fluorescent                                                   31/2015.......
                        Yellow M, Mohawk
                        (CAS No. 52821-24-
                        6) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3204.19.2595)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 26, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40245

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENNETH GREGORY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-6-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
2

Kenneth Gregory challenges his conviction following a jury

trial for assaulting, resisting, and impeding a federal officer in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1). Gregory waived his argument

that the district court erred when it failed to order a mistrial

sua sponte because he explicitly waived his right to challenge the

juror. United States v. Reveles, 190 F.3d 678, 682 (5th Cir.

1999); United States v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 931-32 (5th Cir.

1995). 

Gregory’s argument that the evidence was not sufficient to

support his conviction because the Government failed to prove that

he intended to strike Officer Matt is unavailing. Because Gregory

was not required to know that he was striking a federal officer to

be criminally liable under § 111(a)(1), that he intended to assault

Officer Breaux and instead assaulted Officer Matt does not

exonerate him. United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671, 686 (1975);

United States v. Moore, 997 F.2d 30, 35 n.8 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

LeROY NATHANIEL STRICKLAND

PER CURIAM:

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

No. 2075 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C1-14-112

(Superior Court of California, County of

Los Angeles, No. NA096686)

Attorney Registration No. 29498

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 7

th day of October, 2014, a Rule having been entered by

this Court on July 17, 2014, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing LeRoy

Nathaniel Strickland to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary

suspension and, no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; LeRoy Nathaniel Strickland is

placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E.; and he shall

comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, J. Gordon Huszagh, President & Chief Executive Officer of Suffolk Bancorp (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Dated: May 10, 2010 

/s/ J. Gordon Huszagh 

J. Gordon Huszagh

President & Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph J. Kelly, certify that

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
    Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
    of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
    IndyMac Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-2;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
    whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
    of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
    as of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
    to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
    servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included
    in these reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
    the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with
    the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and except as
    disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
    the servicing agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
    servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
    report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
    review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
    Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
    servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: IndyMac Bank F.S.B., as
servicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as certificate trustee and
as indenture trustee.

Date: 3/30/05

/s/: Joseph J. Kelly
Name: Joseph J. Kelly
Title: Senior Vice President
Company: Lehman ABS Corp.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-067-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 15 - 6033 Directorate ID : 2015 - SW - 019 - AD Helicopter Model: Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 15 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : This proposed AD is prompted by th e determination that placards had not been installed according to specifications on newly manufactured helicopters. The proposed actions are intended to provide exit procedures during an emergency . Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 70 Labor per Helicopter ( 4 work hours X $85 for inspection ) $ 340
Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $410 Total US Fleet Cost $6,150 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : David Hatfield
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2699 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2699

      To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphorus sulfochloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphorus sulfochloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHORUS SULFOCHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Phosphorus          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        sulfochloride                                                      31/2015.......
                        (CAS No. 3982-91-
                        0) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2812.10.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```