alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- High-Tech Launderette LLC Under Contract No. IRW 17-089 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 62259

Mrs. Nanhui Merritt

Owner ScottN. Flesch, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Abraham Young, JA

Trial Attorney OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL ON GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FORLACK OF JURISDICTION The government moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction this appeal from an August 12, 2019 notice that the governmentwould terminate appellant's concession contract effective November 12, 2019 (R4, tab 6). Appellant (1) asks that the Board order the government to "immediately cease and desist their cancellation action," and (2) claims "approximately $150,000" in monetary relief(Notice ofAppeal at 2). Appellant's October 28, 2019 claim to the contracting officer requests a monetary amount "estimated to be in excess of$150,000.00," in breach damages consisting of"a minimum of$150,000.00 in lostrevenue." (R4, tab 11) The government says that we lackjurisdictionbecause (1) the "cease and desist" request is one for injunctive relief, and (2) appellant has not claimed a "sum certain." We agree with the government on both counts. The "cease and desist" request is one for injunctive reliefthat we do notpossessjurisdictionto entertain. CfPuma EnergyHonduras, S.A. De C. 

### V., ASBCANo. 61966, 2020 WL 741650 (Jan. 14, 2020) (request that the Board declare that a contract was still valid and in place and that appellant may deliver fuel to the government was request for injunctive relief; no jurisdiction). The monetary request is for a qualified amount, and, therefore, not a "sum certain"; consequently, we do not possessjurisdictionto entertain that request. CfJoseph Sottolano, ASBCA No. 59777, 15-1 BCA**~** 35,970 at 175,735 (claim for "approximately $11,000" was not one for a sum certain; nojurisdiction); Sandoval PlumbingRepair, Inc., ASBCA No. 54640, 05-2 BCA**~** 33,072 at 163,933 (claim for "no less than $1,072,957.05" was not a sum certain; nojurisdiction); Godwin Equip.,

### Inc., ASBCA No. 53462, 02-1 BCA

## ,r 31,674 at 156,530 (claim for damages stated as "in excess of' $5,000,000 was not one for a sum certain; nojurisdiction). The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Dated: February 26, 2020

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals 

## n'MoTHYP.MLMAI Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur



# ~~---- 0 NC. WILSON Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62259, Appeal ofHigh-Tech Launderette LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

> - Dated:

2 PAULLAK. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1087

_____________________________

JEROME HUGHES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge.

September 18, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jerome Hughes, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months ended            Six Months ended
                                                                June 30,                      June 30,
                                                          2003           2002           2003           2002
                                                       ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Net income                                             $  767,729     $  816,023     $1,526,007     $2,704,050
                                                       ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

Weighted average number of common
  and common equivalent shares

Weighted average common shares outstanding              2,834,835      2,718,370      2,826,607      2,708,612

Shares issued from assumed exercise of
  common stock equivalents(1)                              42,651         90,907         46,670         79,153
                                                       ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding                  2,877,486      2,809,277      2,873,277      2,787,765
                                                       ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========
Earnings per share:
         Basic                                         $      .27     $      .30     $      .54     $     1.00
                                                       ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

         Diluted                                       $      .27     $      .29     $      .53     $      .97
                                                       ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>

(1)      The number of common stock equivalents excluded from the computation of
         earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 because they
         were antifilutive was 529. The number of common stock equivalents
         excluded from the computation of earnings per share for the six months
         ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 because they were antidilutive were 394
         and 11,007, respectively.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20177

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ANTONIO ROMO VERA, also known as Juan Antonio Romo, also 

known as Juan Antonio Romo-Vera, also known as Juan Romo-Vera, also 

known as Antonio Romo Vera, also known as Antonio Ramo, also known as 

Cesar Emilo Reynaga-Rangel, also known as Antiono Juan Romo, also known 

as Juan Antonio Ramo, also known as Juan Romo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-495-1

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Antonio Romo Vera appeals the district court’s application of a 16-

level crime of violence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 in determining his 

sentence for unlawful presence in the United States. This court reviews the

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 7, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-20177 Document: 00514588684 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2018
No. 17-20177

2

district court’s interpretation and application of the Guidelines de novo. 

United States v. Godoy, 890 F.3d 531, 535-36 (5th Cir. 2018). 

We agree with the parties that the crime of violence enhancement for 

Romo Vera’s prior conviction under Texas Penal Code § 30.02(a) was erroneous 

in light of United States v. Herrold, 883 F.3d 517, 541 (5th Cir. 2018) (en banc), 

petitions for cert. filed (Apr. 18, 2018) (No. 17-1445) and (May 21, 2018) (No. 

17-9127), which was issued after Romo Vera was sentenced but while this 

appeal was pending. See Godoy, 890 F.3d at 536 & n.16 (applying Herrold in 

a § 2L1.2 case). Accordingly, we VACATE the sentence and REMAND for 

resentencing. The Government’s motion to stay the appeal is DENIED. See 

United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 145-46 (5th Cir. 2013).

 Case: 17-20177 Document: 00514588684 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/07/2018
Michae ot r

BEYONDBOUNDARIESEXPEDITIONS BARANOFWILDERNESSLODGE 

### (800) 613-6551 907-738-9039 cell

P

. O. Box 2187. SITKA. ALASKA 99835

www

. flyfishalaska

. com What else can I say, Harris Air embodies such a positive service attitude, enthusiasm is high, attention to 

### detail and thoroughness flawless and their in\'I,,.,.I\'I'I:ln1t'I:l~ and commitment to their customers is total. Our business relationship



### . Scott Harris and his Harris Air team has " been forged over decades of time so honored to have them as part of our team and feel very lucky to have lives. We Champion the entire Harris Aircraft Service and so hope they the Air Carrier Certificate they are applying for. Beyond the charter flights that we book weekly with Harris Air to transport our guests and supplies to and from Sitka, having their airplanes available to book a convenient seat fare off one of their scheduled flights to local communities has been a blessing. We have been able to transport many of" our Quests and staff members to Sitka, Juneau, and Petersburg for medical and other emergency needs and allows us to fly in urgent needed supplies and necessity boat parts to keep our operation running smoothly with out interruption. We would like to take the opportunity to thank & praise Scott Harris and the Harris Aviation team for all their support and great service 

### -they have given us over all the years and decades. From 

### 1999 to present Harris ~ir ha's been the umbilical cord to us living and operating in the out back of Alaska and we could not exist as we do with out their great service. The Harris Air operation and team have t been the key element in the great success of our Wilderness Lodge ' and camp operations. We are Mike & Sally Trotter owners and operators of Baranof Wilderness Lodge and Beyond Boundaries Expeditions; through 

### 35 years of outfitting, exploring, and fishing in Alaska's outback we have committed ourselves to bringing our guests the finest in wilderness and fishing experiences. Our Base Camp and Wilderness Lodge are located remote of Sitka, on the east shore of Baranof Island. ALASKA WILDERNESS LOnGE 

# BARANOF September 6th, 2014 t- . " ": Department of Transportation
NUMBER 13-24-00154-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN RE JEANETTE DAIDONE AND WILLIAM ELDON FLORES

 

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña1

Relators Jeanette Daidone and William Eldon Flores filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by transferring venue of the 

underlying case from Nueces County, Texas, to a state court located in Houston, Texas. 

However, relators have now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 

47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

because the trial court has rescinded its order transferring the case. Relators thus assert 

that their petition for writ of mandamus is moot.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that relators’ request for 

mandamus relief is moot. See In re Cont. Freighters, Inc., 646 S.W.3d 810, 813 (Tex. 

2022) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Heckman v. Williamson County, 369 S.W.3d 137, 

162 (Tex. 2012); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. 

proceeding). Accordingly, we grant relators’ unopposed motion to dismiss, and we 

dismiss this original proceeding as moot. 

L. ARON PEÑA JR.

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

21st day of March, 2024.
# Official Journal L 54/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.054.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 54 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5528 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.054.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 54

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5528 February 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) No 168/2012 of 27 February 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 169/2012 of 27 February 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 6 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision 2012/121/CFSP of 27 February 2012 in support of activities to promote EU-China-Africa dialogue and cooperation on conventional arms controls | 8 |
| | * | Council Decision 2012/122/CFSP of 27 February 2012 amending Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria | 14 |
| | * | Council Decision 2012/123/CFSP of 27 February 2012 amending Decision 2011/523/EU partially suspending the application of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Syrian Arab Republic | 18 |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision 2012/124/CFSP of 27 February 2012 implementing Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe | 20 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) No 168/2012 of 27 February 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 169/2012 of 27 February 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

6

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision 2012/121/CFSP of 27 February 2012 in support of activities to promote EU-China-Africa dialogue and cooperation on conventional arms controls

8

*

Council Decision 2012/122/CFSP of 27 February 2012 amending Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

14

*

Council Decision 2012/123/CFSP of 27 February 2012 amending Decision 2011/523/EU partially suspending the application of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Syrian Arab Republic

18

*

Council Implementing Decision 2012/124/CFSP of 27 February 2012 implementing Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe

20

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18039-18040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8972]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee 
on Gulf War Veterans will meet on May 6-7, 2009, at the Residence Inn 
by Marriott, 1199 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. 
to 5 p.m. each day. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and 
recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on issues that are 
unique to Veterans who served in the Southwest Asia theater of 
operations during the 1990-1991 period of the Gulf War.
    On May 6, the Committee will hear from a panel of outreach 
professionals from various VA staff offices. The Committee will also 
receive briefings from the Executive Director of the Iraq and 
Afghanistan Veterans of America and other subject matter experts on 
Gulf War Illness research.
    On May 7, the Committee will receive a briefing from the National 
Director of the Post Deployment Integrated Care Initiative Model about 
VA's strategic plan to implement the Model. In the afternoon of May 6 
and 7, the Committee will discuss recommendations for its final report.
    Public comments will be received on May 6, from 3:15 p.m. until 
3:45 p.m. Individuals wishing to speak must register not later than May 
4, 2009, by contacting Ms. Lelia Jackson at (202) 461-5758 and by 
submitting 1-2 page summaries of their comments for inclusion in the 
official record. A sign-in sheet will be available each day. Members of 
the public may also submit written statements for the Committee's 
review to the Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.
    Interested parties may also listen in by teleconferencing into the 
meeting. The toll-free teleconference line will be open daily from 8:30 
a.m. until 5 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time). To register for the 
teleconference, contact Ms. Lelia Jackson at (202) 461-5758 or via e-
mail at [email protected].

[[Page 18040]]

    Any member of the public seeking additional information should 
contact Laura O'Shea, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 461-5765.

    Dated: April 10, 2009.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-8972 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
CERTIFICATION



I, Hendrik Van Alphen, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Cardero Resource Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2009



/s/Hendrik Van Alphen



Signature



President and Chief Executive Officer

Title
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial  statements of Ray Ellison Mortgage Acceptance Corp. at March 31, 1999
and is qualified in its  entirety by  reference  to such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         754591
<NAME>                        Ray Ellison Mortgage Acceptance Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          20,457
<SECURITIES>                    91,873,438
<RECEIVABLES>                   513,817
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                534,274
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  103,150,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           562,102
<BONDS>                         91,917,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                      9,724,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    103,150,982
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,355,784
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,478,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                424,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,649,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (122,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (42,344)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (80,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (80,311)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (8.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (8.03)
        

</TABLE>