alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Victor Tony JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC18-285

Supreme Court of Florida.

[May 2, 2018]

Neal A. Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, William M. Hennis, III, Litigation Director, and Nicole M. Noël, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Melissa R. Shaw, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Victor Tony Jones' appeal of the circuit court's order denying Jones' motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Jones' motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida* , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Jones responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Jones' response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Jones is not entitled to relief. A jury convicted Jones of two counts of first-degree *66murder and recommended a sentence of death for each count, one by a vote of ten to two and the other by a vote of twelve to zero. *Jones v. State* , 652 So.2d 346, 348 (Fla. 1995). Following the jury's recommendations, the trial court sentenced Jones to death on both counts. *Id.* Jones' sentences of death became final in 1995. *Jones v. Florida* , 516 U.S. 875, 116 S.Ct. 202, 133 L.Ed.2d 136 (1995). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Jones' sentences of death. *See**Hitchcock* , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Jones' motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Jones, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock* .
Eric Robert KRATMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2585 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2585

To suspend temporarily the duty on floor covering and mats, of over 30% 
recycled Polyethylene (PE) or Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA), of the kind 
         used for temporary cushioning for children and adults.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on floor covering and mats, of over 30% 
recycled Polyethylene (PE) or Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA), of the kind 
         used for temporary cushioning for children and adults.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLOOR COVERING AND MATS, OF OVER 30% RECYCLED POLYETHYLENE 
              (PE) OR ETHYLENE-VINYL ACETATE (EVA), OF THE KIND USED 
              FOR TEMPORARY CUSHIONING FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Floor covering and  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        mats, of over 30%                                                  31/2015.......
                        recycled
                        Polyethylene (PE)
                        or Ethylene-Vinyl
                        Acetate (EVA), of
                        the kind used for
                        temporary
                        cushioning for
                        children and
                        adults (provided
                        for in subheading
                        4016.91.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Colby R. LESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-88

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1103

BRYAN O’NEAL BENSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BRAD PLEASANTS, Officer; S. A. SEFTON, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00058-F) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 20, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryan O’Neal Benson, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Maxfield, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Reid Russell, Julie Lynn Bell, PATTERSON, DILTHEY, CLAY, BRYSON & ANDERSON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.*Although this appeal was interlocutory at the time Benson filed the notice of appeal, we possess jurisdiction to consider the merits because the district court has subsequently entered final judgment disposing of the remaining claims. See In re Bryson , 406 F.3d 284 (4th Cir. 2005). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Bryan O’Neal Benson appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Benson’s claims against the Defendants in their official capacities in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Benson v. Pleasants , No. 5:06-cv-00058-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2007). We d ispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              8,041
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     323,742
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                        71,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  546,639
<PP&E>                             90,629
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    649,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             511,177
<BONDS>                            91,667
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                          124,981
<OTHER-SE>                        (78,542)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      649,283
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  881,615
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     486,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  477,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 13,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (96,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (96,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (96,034)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        

</TABLE>
No. 14-14-00278-CR

In the 

Court of Appeals 

For the 

Fourteenth District of Texas 

At Houston 

No. 1243451 

In the 178th District Court 

Of Harris County, Texas 

CHADRICK CANARD JOHNSON 

Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee 

STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

IN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

 COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 10.5(b)(1) and 

38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this motion for extension of 

time in which to file the State’s brief in this case, and, in support thereof, presents the 

following: 

ACCEPTED

14-14-00278-CR

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

12/29/2014 7:21:35 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/29/2014 7:21:35 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
1. In the 178th District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 1243451, 

The State of Texas v. Chadrick Canard Johnson, Appellant was convicted of murder,

and was sentenced to forty five years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division, on March 19, 2014.

2. A written notice of appeal was timely filed on March 19, 2014.

4. The State’s brief was due on December 22, 2014.

5. An extension of time in which to file the State’s brief is requested until January 22, 

20145

6. Two previous extensions of time have been requested by the State.

7. The facts relied upon to explain the need for this extension are:

The State’s Assistant District Attorney on appeal is finalizing a brief for 

submission in Ibarra v. State, 14-14-00471-CR. The State’s Assistant District 

Attorney on appeal was ordered to active duty in the United States Navy from 

December 26, 2014 through January 4, 2015; this period of active duty service 

will delay the work on all assigned briefs. Additional time will be necessary to 

submit previously assigned briefs prior to submission of this brief.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an extension of time until 

January 22, 2015 in which to file the State’s brief in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

SETH GAGLIARDI

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 24073207
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been emailed and faxed

to the attorney for the Appellant on December 29, 2014:

Glenn Youngblood 

5555 South Loop West, Suite 396

Bellaire, TX 77401

Phone: (713) 432-1013

Fax: (713) 574-3042

Email: glenlaw1@comcast.net

SETH GAGLIARDI

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 24073207

Date: December 29, 2014
STATE of Louisiana v. Casey WARREN

2017-KP-0459

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2738 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2738

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of formaldehyde 
         polymers with aniline and with 4,4'-methylendianiline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of formaldehyde 
         polymers with aniline and with 4,4'-methylendianiline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF FORMALDEHYDE POLYMERS WITH ANILINE AND WITH 
              4,4'-METHYLENDIANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.18 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of formaldehyde 
polymers with aniline and with 4,4'-methylendianiline) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
PETTER INVESTMENTS, DBA RIVEER, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

HYDRO ENGINEERING, Defendant

- Appellee

CALIFORNIA CLEANING SYSTEMS, Defendant

______________________

2016

- 2634

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah in No. 2:14

- cv

- 00045

- DB

- DBP, Senior Judge Dee V. B enson.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

S TEPHEN M. L OBBIN , One LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for plaintiff

- appellant.

M ARK A. M ILLER , Holland & Hart LLP, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represen ted by B RETT L. F OSTER

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , L INN , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 11, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner C lerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2596 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2596

       To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Triasulfuron.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Triasulfuron.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIASULFURON.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.28 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Triasulfuron) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 24, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Carte, Vice President, and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  November 2, 2010     /s/ KAREN CARTE Karen Carte Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
# Official Journal C 386A/23 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 386A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6423 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 386A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6423 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2021/C 386 A/01 | Notice of open competitions – Technicians and support workers – EPSO/AST/150/21 – Technicians (AST 3) – Field 1: Audiovisual and conference technicians – Field 2: Building technicians – Field 3: Laboratory technicians – EPSO/AST-SC/11/21 – Laboratory support workers (AST-SC 1) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2021/C 386 A/01

Notice of open competitions – Technicians and support workers – EPSO/AST/150/21 – Technicians (AST 3) – Field 1: Audiovisual and conference technicians – Field 2: Building technicians – Field 3: Laboratory technicians – EPSO/AST-SC/11/21 – Laboratory support workers (AST-SC 1)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
John DOE v. AVITA DRUGS, LLC (d/b/a Avita Pharmacy ), ABC Insurance Company, and Shavayza V. Portson

NO. 2018-CC-0406

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Optionable, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward O'Connor, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


March 28, 2008
                                                   Edward O'Connor
                                                   President
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of SFSB, Inc. (the
“Company”) each certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, that the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and the information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/Philip
                E. LoganPhilip
                E. LoganChairman,
                President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
                31, 2008/s/
                Sophie T. WittelsbergerSophie
                T. WittelsbergerVice
                President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch
                31, 2008





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document,
      and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason
      other
      than as specifically required by law.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2526 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2526

         To suspend temporarily the duty on triflic anhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on triflic anhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIFLIC ANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Triflic anhydride   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 358-23-                                                  12/31/2015
                          06) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2904.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00333-CR

Ricardo Jimenez

v.

State of Texas

On Appeal from the

341st District Court of Webb County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019CRF000166D3

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 28, 2024
**CONSENT
      OF BEARD MILLER COMPANY LLP**







We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8


(No.
      333-127639) of SFSB, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2006 relating to
      the
      consolidated financial statements of SFSB, Inc., which appears in the 2005
      Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
      Form
      10-KSB.




/s/
      Beard
      Miller Company LLP




Beard
      Miller Company LLP


Baltimore,
      Maryland


March
      27,
      2006
GIBBS CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. v. NATIONAL RICE MILL, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-C-0464

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

Denied.