alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,910,742
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         950,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 93,128,368
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      93,128,368
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        93,128,368
<LOANS>                                    461,092,509
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,515,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             633,063,496
<DEPOSITS>                                 541,203,832
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,994,399
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          8,091,726
<LONG-TERM>                                 37,105,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       466,511
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,201,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             633,063,496
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             21,800,453
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,855,030
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               101,793
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            24,757,277
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          11,558,266
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,224,558
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,532,719
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  543,453
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             14,394,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,574,748
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,574,748
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,172,359
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,283,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,682,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,970,597
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,080,441
<RECOVERIES>                                    81,574
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,515,184
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,515,184
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6616

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MAXIMILLIAN ROBBINS FARROW , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cr - 00120

- LMB

- 1 )

Submitted : September 22, 2020 Decided: September 2 5 , 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Maximillian Robbins Farrow, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Following his guilty plea, Maximillian Robbins Farrow was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. At Farrow’s September 2017 sentencing, the district court imposed a 48

- month term of imprisonment. F arrow did not appeal the criminal judgment. Instead, in April 2019, Farrow filed a self

- styled motion for clarification of the manner in which the court applied the Sentencing Guidelines in his case. The district court denied this motion on various groun ds, and Farrow now appeals that order. Upon review, we discern no error in the district court’s rationale for denying Farrow’s motion for clarification. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Farrow , No. 1:17

- cr - 00120

- LMB

- 1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofBenjamin Franklin Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe Year Ended December 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of thesignatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Claire S. Bean       Claire S. Bean *Chief Financial Officer*Date: March 29, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
BROOKTROUT TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) BROOKTROUT TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,602
<SECURITIES>                                     8,711
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,081
<INVENTORY>                                      8,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,092
<PP&E>                                          12,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,012
<SALES>                                         26,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,104
<CGS>                                           10,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,156
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,988
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2599 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fenpyroximate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fenpyroximate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FENPYROXIMATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 tert-Butyl (E)-α-(1,3-dimethyl-5-phenoxypyrazol-4- 

ylmethyleneamino oxy)-ρtoluate (Fenpyroximate) 

(CAS No. 134098–61–6) 

(provided for in subheading 2933.19.23) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2599 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2633 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Pinoxaden. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

Pinoxaden. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PINOXADEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.60 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Pinoxaden) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘1.1%’’ in the column 1 general 

8 rate of duty column and inserting ‘‘5.2%’’; and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2633 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered December 13, 2021 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00186-CR 

DANIEL ARTURO CONTRERAS, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F18-76586-H 

ORDER 

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing requesting that we modify the 

trial court’s judgments to remove unauthorized court costs. Appellant contends the 

State agrees to the modifications. We cannot grant a motion for rehearing unless a 

response has been filed or requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.2. We ORDER the 

State to file a response to the motion within fourteen days of the date of this order. 

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN 

 JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.9
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation at February 25, 2022
This Exhibit discloses the current understandings with respect to cash compensation between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) and each of its non-employee directors. Axcelis provides cash retainers to its non-employee directors, as follows:
	​


	​



	Annual Cash Retainers, paid quarterly in advance
​

	Board Member Retainer
	$60,000

	Independent Chairman Premium
	$50,000

	Committee Chair Retainers
	​

	Audit Committee Chairman
	$25,000

	Compensation Committee Chairman
	$15,000

	Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman
	$10,000

	Technology and Product Development Committee Chairman
	$10,000

	Committee Member (not Chairman) Retainers
	​

	Audit Committee Member
	$10,000

	Compensation Committee Member
	$7,500

	Nominating and Governance Committee Member
	$5,000

	Technology and Product Development Committee Member
	$5,000



​
Non-employee directors also receive reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.  Non-employee directors do not receive any Company-paid perquisites.
​
The Board of Directors may, from time to time, form committees in addition to the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance and Technology and Product Development Committees and set compensation for service on such additional committees.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Lori A. Jones, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Analytical Surveys, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 

 

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and the registrant’s have: 

 

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)    Disclosed in this quarterly reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the 

audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a)    All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 14, 2003

 

/s/    Lori A. Jones

Lori A. Jones

Chief Financial Officer
STATE EX REL. Jamie COOPER v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0433

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LIVINGSTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he pled guilty involuntarily. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

*912Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Date: May 11, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Greg A. Tunney
    *Greg A. TunneyTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  Date: May 11, 2011
    By:
    /s/ José G. Ibarra
    *José G. IbarraTitle:
    Senior Vice President  Finance and 
Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 *
    
    These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. These
certifications shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that R.G. Barry
Corporation specifically incorporates these certifications by reference.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133901 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133901 COA: 276305 Oakland CC: 2006-207622-FC JEFFREY LYNN HUMPHREY, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
Quintell A. BOWENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Official Journal C 153/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 153 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5118 June 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 153

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5118 June 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2008/C 153/01 | Special report No 3/2008 — The European Union Solidarity Fund: how rapid, efficient and flexible is it? Together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Auditors

2008/C 153/01

Special report No 3/2008 — The European Union Solidarity Fund: how rapid, efficient and flexible is it? Together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Jimmy Whang, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          STRATS(SM) Trust For Morgan Stanley Securities, Series 2004-11 (the
          "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
          servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year
          covered by this annual report of the Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
          trust agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Depositor and the Trustee under the trust agreement and based upon
          my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
          agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Depositor and
          Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
          and

     5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          compliance by the Trustee and the Depositor with the minimum
          servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by an
          independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
          compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
          Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement
          that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 28, 2005

/s/ Jimmy Whang
---------------------

Name:   Jimmy Whang
Title:  Director
D.L., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1526

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Thomas MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.