alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q, WHICH IS ATTACHED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000752634
<NAME>                        EARTH SEARCH SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2001
<CASH>                                           1,266,810
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      650,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   619,086
<PP&E>                                          17,964,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,397,929
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,452,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,473,575
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000,000
<COMMON>                                          (138,669)
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,126,383)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,452,153
<SALES>                                          1,881,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,881,925
<CGS>                                            1,815,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,592,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 756,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,165,676)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,165,676)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,165,676
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.047)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.047)



</TABLE>
Mr. Bradley Clark Kalitta Charters, L LC 843 Willow Run Airport Ypsilanti, MI48198 Dear Mr. Clark : This letter is to inform y ou that we are unable to process y our request for an exemption from § 61.3(a) and (c)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulatio ns (14 CFR). I t explains why we can’t process y our request and what y ou should do in the next 30 day s. **Why We Can’t Process Your Request** We entered y our October 24, 2011 , exemption request on behalf of Kalitta Charter, L LC into the public docket (No. FAA
- 20 03
- 16809) , but we are unable to process y our request any further. The information y ou sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, y ou must send us all of the following:

 The sp ecific section or sections of 14 CFR from which y ou seek relief, the extent of the relief y ou seek, and the reason y ou seek relief.

 The reasons why

granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why

the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety

or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which y ou seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support y our request. **What You Should Do** If y ou want us to process y our request any further, y ou must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 day s. We will consider the docket on y our request open until we receive this required info rmation from y ou. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires y ou to send y our petition for exemption at least 120 day s before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

**If We Don’t Hear From You** If we don’t hear from y ou within 30 day s, we will close the docket without notifying y ou further. If y ou have any

questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267
- 9677. Sincerely ,
Id a M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3

Project No.: A FS
- 12
- 049
- E Project Offi cer: _______________ ARM
- 10 1 : KJone s: 11/1/2011 :Doc# 33223 ARM
- 1/100/10 1 :Program Office AFS
- 800 Statistics: Reject Letter.doc, 381 words Original, 26 Oct 2011 08:35 Style Index 23 **Excellent** for a Legal Document Average Sentence Length 21 **Good** Passive Index 0 **Excellent MR BRADLEY CLARK**  **KALITTA CHARTERS**  **LLC 843**  **WILLOW RUN**  **AIRPORT YPSILANTI**  **MI 48198**
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Kenneth S. Adessky, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Newsearch, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuerand have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’smost recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the smallbusiness issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  September 13, 2007 /s/ Kenneth S. Adessky   Kenneth S. Adessky, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,048]


United Machine Works, Inc., Greenville, NC; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 30, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by three workers on behalf of United Machine Works, 
Inc., Greenville, North Carolina.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8277 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Tony VILLEGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Juan Jose RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5642

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to
Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective as of October 10, 2011, is made by and between DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and Michael J. Ruen (the
“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as
of October 9, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.6 of the Employment
Agreement, the Company and the Executive desire to amend certain terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is mutually acknowledged, the Company and the
Executive agree as follows: 
 1. Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is replaced in its entirety by the following:

 “1. Term. The Company hereby employs the Executive, and the Executive hereby accepts such employment, for a term
commencing on October 10, 2009 and continuing through October 9, 2012, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 or Section 5 (the period during which the Executive is employed hereunder being
hereinafter referred to as the “Term”).” 
 2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement
continues in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. The Employment Agreement, together with any Exhibits thereto and this Amendment, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties hereto regarding the employment of
the Executive. 
 3. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado,
without regard to any principles of conflicts of laws which could cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Colorado. 
 4. This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original but all such counterparts together shall constitute one
and the same instrument. Each counterpart may consist of two copies hereof each signed by one of the parties hereto. 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written. 
  

			
	COMPANY:
	
	DCT INDUSTRIAL TRUST INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Philip L. Hawkins

		 	Name: Philip L. Hawkins
		 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	 /s/ Michael J. Ruen

	Michael J. Ruen
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40543

Summary Calendar

 

JOEL DAVILA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-CV-5

- - - - - - - - - -

July 2, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joel Davila, # 611966, appeals the denial of his application

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The

district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on

the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. Davila argues

that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary due to

counsel’s ineffective assistance, because counsel erroneously
No. 96-40543

- 2 -

** Davila did not allege the specifics of this claim in the

district court, and so his allegations relating to counsel’s

failure to investigate the case, made for the first time on

appeal, will not be considered. Alexander v. McCotter, 775 F.2d

595, 603 (5th Cir. 1985).

*** This alleged error is irrelevant in the context of a

guilty plea.

  Davila provides no facts or argument for this alleged

error in his brief, and so it is not considered. See Yohey v.

Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).

informed him that he was charged with simple sexual assault, not

aggravated sexual assault. He also contends that counsel failed

to investigate the case,**  failed to call witnesses in favor of

the defense***, and failed to pursue “predicatory procedures” that

would have effectually preserved errors for appeal.**** Davila

has failed to show that he is entitled to habeas corpus relief. 

See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985); Armstead v. Scott,

37 F.3d 202, 210 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1709

(1995). The Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.4 Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to
            Certificateholders as of December 31,2004

            STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION
            MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
            SERIES 2004-17XS

              Original      Beginning
Class          Balance        Balance   Principal     Interest
A1          121774000.00  121774000.00  21951638.00   796835.85
A2          31319000.00    31319000.00        0.00    464565.17
A3A         35819000.00    35819000.00        0.00    650711.83
A3B         30000000.00    30000000.00        0.00    554000.00
A4A         12162000.00    12162000.00        0.00    201889.20
A4B         12162000.00    12162000.00        0.00    202700.00
M1           5794000.00     5794000.00        0.00    104485.13
M2           4507000.00     4507000.00        0.00     87886.50
M3           3991000.00     3991000.00        0.00     79820.00
P                  0.00           0.00        0.00     86285.33
X                  0.00           0.00        0.00   1634436.96
R                  0.00           0.00        0.00         0.00

                         Ending
Class      Loss         Balance
A1          0.00     99822362.00
A2          0.00     31319000.00
A3A         0.00     35819000.00
A3B         0.00     30000000.00
A4A         0.00     12162000.00
A4B         0.00     12162000.00
M1          0.00      5794000.00
M2          0.00      4507000.00
M3          0.00      3991000.00
P           0.00            0.00
X           0.00            0.00
R           0.00            0.00
Form of Director Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.16 
 «Name» 
 Metavante Non-Statutory Stock Option Award for Directors 
 «Date» Certificate of Award Agreement 
  
  

			
	 Number of stock options awarded:
	  	«Shares»
		
	 Price per share at which options are exercisable:
	  	$                    
		
	 Date options were awarded (“Grant Date”):
	  	                      
		
	 Vesting Schedule:
	  	25% vests one year after
Grant Date
		
		  	An additional 25% vests two
years after Grant Date
		
		  	An additional 25% vests three
years after Grant Date
		
		  	An additional 25% vests four
years after Grant Date
		  	
	 Option term:
	  	10 years

  
 See the Terms of the Award Agreement
and Plan Prospectus for the specific provisions related to this Option Award, including the time period for exercise and other important information concerning this Award. 
 This document is intended as a summary of your individual Option Award. If there are any discrepancies between this summary and the provisions of the formal documents of this Award, including the Terms of the
Award Agreement, Plan Document or Plan Prospectus, the provisions of the formal documents will prevail. 







 Metavante 
 Terms of the Award Agreement 
 1. Nonstatutory Stock Option. This option award is a nonstatutory stock option
granted under the Metavante 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and will become vested in accordance with the schedule contained in the Certificate of Award Agreement (the “Certificate”). 
 2. Termination of Service. If your service with the Company terminates, the Option will be exercisable for three (3) years following your termination of
service as a director, but not beyond the remaining Option term. The Option shall be exercisable only to the extent it is vested on the date your service terminates. In no event will it be exercisable after the end of the Option term as reflected on
the Certificate. 
 3. Method of Exercising Option. You may exercise this Option, provided that it meets all vesting requirements, by calling Fidelity
at 1-800-544-9354. Keep in mind that an “insider” is subject to blackout restrictions which may prevent exercise during certain time periods referred to as the ‘blackout period.” You have been notified of the restrictions by the
Company in writing. 
 4. Change in Control. Notwithstanding the vesting schedule reflected in the Certificate, this Option will be exercisable in
full upon your termination of service within 2 years after a Change in Control of the Company. 
 5. Miscellaneous. In the event that the terms hereof
and the provisions of the Plan conflict, the Plan shall control. All terms used herein which are not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as in the Plan. 
  

 2
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION(Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, Steven D. Foster, the Chief Financial Officer of Parallel PetroleumCorporation (“Parallel”), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Parallel forthe quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the periodic reporting requirements of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in that Form 10-Q Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofParallel.Date:November 9, 2007     /s/ Steven D. Foster     Steven D. Foster,  Chief Financial Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel Petroleum Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
v237484_ex10-14 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Vantage Drilling International (the Company) for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas G. Smith, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|April 29, 2016                       
|                                     
|/s/ DOUGLAS G. SMITH                 
|Douglas G. Smith                     
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
v237484_ex10-3 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-31097

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TERRANCE A. THORNTON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:17-CR-147-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Terrance A. 

Thornton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Thornton has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 1, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-31097 Document: 00514938159 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/01/2019
No. 18-31097

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-31097 Document: 00514938159 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/01/2019