1 Page

– Fagerman Technologies, Inc. Exemption Request

March 9 , 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation
Docket Management System
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act

of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Fagerman Technologies, Inc. requests exemptions from several provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) in accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization

and Reform Act of 2012

. Fagerman Technologies, Inc. is located at 56 Gilchrist Rd. Somerville, Al

35670.

Fagerman Technologies, Inc. seeks exemption s in order to commercially operate the TBM RF70, DJI S1000, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 3, Gryphon Dynamics GD

- 12 (Dodeca), Gryphon Dynamics

GD

- 8 (Octo), Gryphon Dynamics GD

- 6 (Hexa), Gryphon Dynamics GD

- X8 (Coaxial), Gryphon
Dynamics GD

- Y6 (TRI

- Coaxial), Xfold Spy, Xfold Travel, Xfold Cinema, Xfold Dragon, SteadiDrone

VADE R, SteadiDrone MAVRIK, SteadiDrone SIKS, SteadiDrone , Pulse Ae rospace VAPOR 35

- UAS, Pulse Aerospace V APOR 55

- UAS, Pulse Aerospace V APOR

- CAS, Pulse Aerospace VAPOR

- GEO, Pulse Aerospace VAPOR

- IRAD, Leptron RDASS 1000 Q uadcopter

, and Leptron Avenger Unmanned Helicopter Cust om unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in a sterile environment clear of people and objects for the purposes of training , R&D, demonstrations and gathering aerial
imagery.

Pilots in Command hold a minimum of a FAA issued sport private pilot certificate

, driver’s

license or third class medical certificate

, and have passed a rigorous internal training and certification program administered by Fagerman Technologies, Inc. senior staff . Operators are

trained on the any or all of the stated equipment and are type rated. Operators follow the OEM
training guidelin es, manufacturer pilot operating handbooks, FAA regulations pursuant to
Section 333 of the reform act, and syllabus provided by the manufacturers TBM, DJI , Gry phon
Dynamics, Xfold

, SteadiDrone, Pulse Aerospace, Leptron and Fagerman Technologies, Inc.

Fagerman Technologies, Inc. is a leading company in Lidar equipment and services. It proposes to use small, lightweight UAS under 55 lbs. for training , R&D, demonstrations and gathering
aerial imagery. The stated sUAS are electric powered s UAS , equipped with one to twelve

mo tors weighing no more than 55 pounds.

This exemption will permit Fagerman Technologies, Inc. to safely operate UAS s under controlled conditions and in sterile environments for the purpose of training , R&D,2 Page

– Fagerman Technologies, Inc. Exemption Request

demonstrations and gatherin g aerial imagery . Approval of this exemption will enhance overall safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation's (the FAA Administrator's) responsibilities to

“... establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the nationa l airspace system" Consistent with Section 333(c) of the Reform Act.

The name and address of the petitioner is:

Fagerman Technologies, Inc.

Attn: Jeff Fagerman

Phone: 256

- 274

- 1416

Email: jeff@lidarusa.com
Address: 56 Gilchrist Rd. Somerville, AL 35670

The petitioner requests relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates . In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation,

the Secr etary of Transportation should determine that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA should find that the requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certific ates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

The Basis for Decision

 Fagerman Technologies, Inc. has requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circums tances similar in all material respects to those presented in our petition. In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew , rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

The reasons for requesting an exemption are that:

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112 , and 11213 also apply to the situation we present; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Recommendation for a Decision3 Page

– Fagerman Technologies, Inc. Exemption Request

 In consideration of the foregoing, we feel that a grant of exemption is in the public

interest.

 We request, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to you by the Administrator that Fagerman Technologies, Inc. be granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c)

, 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow Fagerman Technologies, Inc. to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection, R&D and training

.

 This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this request for grant of exemption, Fagerman Technologies, Inc. is hereafter referred to as the

operator. Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption

will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this request for grant of exemption are limited to the TBM RF70, DJI S1000, DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 3, Gryphon Dynamics GD

- 12 ( Dodeca), Gryphon
Dynamics GD

- 8 (Octo), Gryphon Dynamics GD

- 6 (Hexa), Gryphon Dynamics GD

- X8 (Coaxial), Gryphon Dynamics GD

- Y6 (TRI

- Coaxial), Xfold Spy, Xfold Travel, Xfold Cinema,
Xfold Dragon , SteadiDrone VADER, SteadiDrone MAVRIK, St eadiDrone SIKS,

Stead iDrone, Pulse Aerospace VAPOR 35

- UAS, Pulse Aerospace V APOR 55

- UAS, Pulse
Aerospace V APOR

- CAS, Pulse Aerospace VAPOR

- GEO, Pulse Aerospace VAPOR

- IRAD,
Leptron RDASS 1000 Q uadcopter

, and Leptron Avenger Unmanned Helicopter Custom unmanned aircraft systems (UAS)

. All mentioned sUAS weigh less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filmi ng are not permitted.

3. The UA will not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the aircraft

manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must b e operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capabil ity. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the4 Page

– Fagerman Technologies, Inc. Exemption Request

flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of th e flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption request and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this request of

e xemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present updated and

revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to it s grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight cha racteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in

a condition for sa fe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipme nt. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer safety

bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of

Co lumbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not perm it any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification5 Page

– Fagerman Technologies, Inc. Exemption Request

flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (training, proficiency, and experience

- bui lding) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedi cated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in

accord ance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a pre

determined location within the private or controlled

- access property.
19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organiz ation (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct operations that

cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at

the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official

upon request.
24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and activities

at all times.

25. The UAS may n ot be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:6 Page

– Fagerman Technologies, Inc. Exemption Request a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the P IC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present
an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours . Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained

on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the

UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.