alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **Section 906    Certification of Principal Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned    officer of Novelis Inc. (Novelis), hereby certifies that    Novelis’ Annual Report on    Form 10-K/A    for the year ended December 31, 2006 (Report) fully    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange    Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in    the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and results of operations of Novelis. /s/  Rick    Dobson    Rick Dobson    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)     Date: April 30, 2007     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant    to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as    part of this report.
EXHIBIT 31.2RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONI, Daniel D. Viren, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R. G. Barry Corporation for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2007;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [Reserved]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 14, 2007 /s/ Daniel D. Viren Printed Name: Daniel D. Viren    Title: Senior Vice President – Finance, Chief    Financial Officer and Secretary    (Principal Financial Officer)  
29
exv4w16






Exhibit 4.16




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE




MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION



AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



     WHEREAS, Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the Magnum
Hunter Resources Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date set forth below, but
subject to the approval of the Company’s common stockholders, by restating Section 4.1 of the Plan
in its entirety to read as follows:



     4.1 Maximum Number of Shares Available; Certain Restrictions on Awards. Subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 4.3 of the Plan, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock
that will be available for issuance under the Plan will be 20,000,000, of which 7,500,000 shares
may be available for use in connection with Incentive Options. No more than 11,250,000 shares of
Common Stock may be the subject of Awards that are not Options or Stock Appreciation Rights. The
aggregate number of shares with respect to which an Award or Awards may be granted to any one
Participant in any one taxable year of the Company may not exceed 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock.
The shares available for issuance under the Plan may, at the election of the Committee, be either
treasury shares or shares authorized but unissued, and, if treasury shares are used, all references
in the Plan to the issuance of shares will, for corporate law purposes, be deemed to mean the
transfer of shares from treasury.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, acting pursuant to authority granted to him by the Board
of Directors of the Company, has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be executed this 1st day of
April, 2011.



MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  Gary C. Evans
 	 
	 	 	Gary C. Evans 	 
	 	 	Chairman of the Board
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 30, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00755

- CV

IN RE Oscar BUSTOS

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On Octo ber 29, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the

opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and th e real party in interest may

file a response to the petition in this court no later than November 13, 2014. Any such

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on October 30 th , 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007CI07181, styled In the Interest of E.B. and O.S.B. II, Minor Children

, pending in the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000753557
<NAME>                        LBO Capital Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997     
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1997       
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                       406
<SECURITIES>                              30,437     
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          30,843
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            30,843     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    553,848      
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   1,210    
<OTHER-SE>                              (524,215)       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              30,843
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                400     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        25,925     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (26,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (26,325)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        


</TABLE>
From: James Hirtz [mailto:Hirtz.James@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 12:09 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Bill Schrock; John Bradfield; Kelley Spence; Robin Dunkins; Terri Hollingsworth

Subject: RE: Pulp and Paper RTR draft final rule 

Here is the Final Risk Assessment Report and Appendices

(See attached file: Appendix 8.pdf)(See attached file: Appendix 1.pdf)(See attached file: 

Appendix 2.pdf)(See attached file: Appendix 3.pdf)(See attached file: Appendix 4 

Multipathway.pdf)(See attached file: Appendix 5.pdf)(See attached file: Appendix 6.pdf)(See 

attached file: Appendix 7.pdf)(See attached file: Pulp Paper Risk Assessment Final 2012.pdf)

James Hirtz

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

OAQPS/HEID/ATAG

109 T. W. Alexander Drive

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

hirtz.james@epa.gov

(919)-541-0881 voice

(919)-541-0359 Fax
Letter Agreement dated October 2, 2007



 Exhibit 10.21 
 October 2, 2007 
 Mr. Joseph P. “Duke” Gallagher, III 
 102 Versailles 
 Houma, LA 70360 
 Reference: Termination of Employment 
 Pursuant to our conversation today, you and I have mutually agreed that you will cease providing services to
Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. (“Gulf Island”), and this letter agreement formalizes the particulars of our agreement: 
  

	 	1.	Effective October 2, 2007, you will cease to be the Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Gulf Island, and you will no longer be classified as an
officer of Gulf Island. 


	 	2.	Your employment with Gulf Island will terminate effective December 15, 2007. 


	 	3.	On December 15, 2007, Gulf Island will pay you a one-time, lump sum severance payment of $15,833.34. 


	 	4.	You will remain eligible to receive an incentive bonus for fiscal year 2007, which will be calculated in the manner previously determined by the Gulf Island Board of Directors, such
that your bonus will be equal to .40 of 1% of the consolidated income before taxes, before deduction of all executive incentive bonuses and before inter-company consolidating eliminations of the corporation for the calendar year as soon as possible
after the outside auditors “sign off” on the fourth quarter and twelve months earnings release, but in no event will such bonus be paid after March 15, 2008. 

 Gulf Island wishes you the best of luck in your future endeavors. If the above reflects your understanding of the terms of your termination of employment, please indicate your agreement by signing below. This letter
agreement will not be effective unless signed by you. 
 GULF ISLAND FABRICATION, INC. 

	
	
	/s/ Kerry J. Chauvin
	 Kerry J. Chauvin
 Chairman of the Board, President and
CEO


  
 I, Joseph P. “Duke” Gallagher, III,
agree that the above reflects the terms of my termination of employment from Gulf Island Fabrication Inc., as evidenced by my signature below. 
  

	
	
	
	/s/ Joseph P. Gallagher, III
	Joseph P. “Duke” Gallagher, III
UNIVERSITY CHEVROLET BUICK GMC v. Jessie Louise SPRINGER

2150998

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2802 

To suspend temporarily the duty on benzenesulfonic acid, 4-chloro-2-[[4,5- 

dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1-(3-sulfophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]azo]-5-methyl-, 

calcium salt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on benzenesulfonic acid, 

4-chloro-2-[[4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1-(3-sulfophenyl)- 

1H-pyrazol-4-yl]azo]-5-methyl-, calcium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZENESULFONIC ACID, 4-CHLORO-2-[[4,5- 

4 DIHYDRO-3-METHYL-5-OXO-1-(3- 

5 SULFOPHENYL)-1H-PYRAZOL-4-YL]AZO]-5- 

6 METHYL-, CALCIUM SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2802 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Benzenesulfonic acid, 4- 

chloro-2-[[4,5-dihydro-3- 

methyl-5-oxo-1-(3- 

sulfophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-4- 

yl]azo]-5-methyl-, calcium 

salt (1:1) (CAS No. 129423– 

54–7) (provided for in subheading 3204.17.60) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Second Amendment to Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.40 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE 
 This SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY
NOTE (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of this 28th day of September, 2011 by and among GCT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Kyeong Ho Lee (the “Lender”), the
parties to that certain promissory note (the “Note”) dated as of December 15, 2003 between the Company and the Lender. 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Note, the outstanding
principal amount of the Note and any accrued interest thereon has a maturity date of December 15, 2005 (the “Maturity Date”) as set forth therein; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender amended the Note pursuant to the September 29, 2004 Amendment (the “First Amendment”) and hereby desire to amend the Note again as set forth below.

 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual promises contained herein, the Company and the
Lender, intending to be legally bound hereby agree: 
 1.    Maturity Date of Note. Notwithstanding
anything in the Note and the First Amendment, the Maturity Date of the Note shall be March 31, 2013. 

2.    Other Provisions Intact. Except as set forth in this Agreement, all the terms and provisions of the Note
not otherwise altered or eliminated by this Agreement shall remain unchanged, unmodified, and in full force and effect, and the Note shall be read together and construed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 

3.    Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left
Blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Lender have executed this Second Amendment to
Promissory Note to be effective as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	BORROWER:
	
	GCT Semiconductor, Inc.,
	a Delaware Corporation
		
	By;	 	/s/ Gene Kulzer
	Name:	 	Gene Kulzer
	Title:	 	Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
	
	LENDER:
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kyeong Ho Lee
	Kyeong Ho Lee
<PAGE>1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of American Insured Mortgage Investors - Series
85, L.P. (the "Issuer").

I, Cynthia O. Azzara, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(i)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)          the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly represents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Issuer.


                                        AMERICAN INSURED MORTGAGE
                                        INVESTORS - SERIES 85, L.P.
                                        (Registrant)

                                        By:      CRIIMI, Inc.
                                                 General Partner



May 7, 2004                             /s/Cynthia O. Azzara
-----------                             ---------------------------------
Date                                    Cynthia O. Azzara
                                        Executive Vice President, Chief
                                        Financial Officer and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the General Partner and will be retained by the General Partner and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE EX REL. Scott Anthony LAURENT v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2174

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his fourth application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations *970period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael W. Kinley, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 40-F/A of Cardero Resource Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  April 13, 2006



/s/ Michael W. Kinley

Michael W. Kinley
  Chief Financial Officer