alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,247
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,678,829
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,137,357
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,801,540)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (1,658,583)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               81,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (81,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (81,273)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (81,273)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.004)
        


</TABLE>
U. S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 To Whom 

### ItMayConcern, January 31,2013

. I

·, ., J ·..,, North American Airlines (NOCA172S) hereby requests reliefin the form ofan Exemption to the requirements of 14 CFR 

### §121.803(c)(3), which requires airplanes with seating capacity of more than nine passengers to carryan Emergency Medical Kit (EMK) with contents as specified inAppendix A to Part 121. Specifically, we request that FAA temporarily suspend for one yeara requirement for North American Airlines to include Atropine in the EMKs ofour aircraft during flight operations because ofa manufacturing supply shortage leaving airlines without the means to complywith the requirements ofAppendix A It is the stated duty ofthe holder ofan Air Carrier Certificate under 49 U.S.C. to "provide service with the highest possible degree ofsafety in the public interest". EMKs are not intended tobe comprehensive; orto include treatment for everypossible medical condition, butinsteadprovide options for addressing the most frequent tYJ>es ofmedical emergencies. Removal ofAtropine from the EMKwould not adversely affect the safety ofthe traveling public as surveys conducted byproviders ofEMK devices suchas Banyan and MedAire indicate it is used very infrequently. · Absent this relief, there is no means to comply with section 121.803, Part 121 Appendix A,. and MELrequirements when Atropine needs to berestocked in the EMK. This creates the possibilitythat aircraft wouldhave to be taken outofservice until additional supplies can be obtained. While this would be a last resort, it is not implausible. Grounding otherwise airworthy aircraft for this reason alone would disrupt air service, including critical flight operations conducted for the Department ofDefense and othergovernment agencies, and is not in the public interest. Granting this exemption would help to ensure that these services continue uninterrupted, and in this respect would serve the public interest.

101 Wor1d Drive Peachtree City, GA30269 fl

### North American Airlines intends to 

### utilize the benefit ofthis proposed Exemption throughout our operating system, and respectfully requests permission to do so during operations conducted outside the United States to maintain consistency across the operation. Approval ofthe requested exemption would be consistent with the latitudes granted to a previous petitioner via Exemption , 10690. Please contact me ifyou should have any questions, and thank you for yoirr assistance.with our request.

Captain David P. Currier Vice President- Operations North American Airlines 101 World Dr. Peachtree City, GA 30269 dcurrier@flynaa.com C: Insp. Daniel 

### J. Egy (ATL CM0-65); 

### J. Casbarro; R. Mercurio; C. Hewitt; 

### R. Calascibetta

101 World Drive Peachtree City, GA 30269 

### -.
Exhibit 34.2



|                                   |                                                      
|---------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|[ex342reportofindregpubacc001.jpg] | KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-5212







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

Citibank, N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 26, 2010
# Official Journal L 225/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 225 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 616 September 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 225

English edition

Legislation

Volume 616 September 2018

---

| Contents | | Corrigenda | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2017/2455 of 5 December 2017 amending Directive 2006/112/EC and Directive 2009/132/EC as regards certain value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods ( OJ L 348, 29.12.2017 ) | 1 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2017/2455 of 5 December 2017 amending Directive 2006/112/EC and Directive 2009/132/EC as regards certain value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods ( OJ L 125, 22.5.2018 ) | 1 |

Contents

Corrigenda

page

*

Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2017/2455 of 5 December 2017 amending Directive 2006/112/EC and Directive 2009/132/EC as regards certain value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods ( OJ L 348, 29.12.2017 )

( OJ L 348, 29.12.2017 )

1

*

Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2017/2455 of 5 December 2017 amending Directive 2006/112/EC and Directive 2009/132/EC as regards certain value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods ( OJ L 125, 22.5.2018 )

( OJ L 125, 22.5.2018 )

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000752324
<NAME>                        New England Community Bancorp
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                        U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Sep-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          36,737
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             595
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                19,750
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    185,992
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,207
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        519,555
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 812,626
<DEPOSITS>                                     611,581
<SHORT-TERM>                                    25,585
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,184
<LONG-TERM>                                    101,117
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           706
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 812,626
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 33,124
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,013
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   620
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                42,757
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,074
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,081
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           27,198
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      478
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (67)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,066
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,589
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,589
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,151
<LOANS-PAST>                                        60
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 14,291
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,092
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      834
<RECOVERIES>                                       468
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,292
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,292
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 173/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 173 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 633 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 173

English edition

Legislation

Volume 633 June 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/729 of 26 May 2020 on the conclusion of the Status Agreement between the European Union and Montenegro on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Montenegro | 1 |
| | * | Status Agreement between the European Union and Montenegro on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Montenegro | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/729 of 26 May 2020 on the conclusion of the Status Agreement between the European Union and Montenegro on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Montenegro

1

*

Status Agreement between the European Union and Montenegro on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Montenegro

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.01
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2658 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2658

To suspend temporarily the duty on ion exchange resin - Methanamine, N 
 methyl reaction products with chloromethylated divinylbenzene-styrene 
                                polymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on ion exchange resin - Methanamine, N 
 methyl reaction products with chloromethylated divinylbenzene-styrene 
                                polymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN - METHANAMINE, N METHYL REACTION PRODUCTS 
              WITH CHLOROMETHYLATED DIVINYLBENZENE-STYRENE POLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Ion exchange resin  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        - Methanamine, N                                                   31/2015.......
                        methyl reaction
                        products with
                        chloromethylated
                        divinylbenzene-
                        styrene polymer
                        (CAS No. 68441-29-
                        2) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3914.00.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6664

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CARROLL EDGAR BLEVINS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District 

Judge. (1:06-cr-00016-jpj-1; 1:08-cv-80080-jpj-mfu)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carroll Edgar Blevins, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Carroll Edgar Blevins seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Blevins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 420/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 420 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5816 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 420

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5816 December 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2015/C 420/1 | Decision | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2015/C 420/1

Decision

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50433 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Adolfo Perez Garcia,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:20

- CR

- 175

- 1

Before **Davis, Jones,** and **Elrod,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *

The attorney appointed to represent Adolfo Perez Garcia has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 14, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50433 Document: 00516200800 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2022No. 21

- 50433

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-50433 Document: 00516200800 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/14/2022
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-1558

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Douglas Warren Biddle

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: September 27, 2012

Filed: October 1, 2012

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Biddle challenges the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district

court imposed after he pled guilty to conspiring to distribute 500 grams or more of 1

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.
a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine and 50 grams or more of actual

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and 846. His

counsel has moved to withdraw, and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), arguing thatBiddle’s sentence is unreasonable and greater than necessary

to effectuate the purposes of sentencing. 

Upon careful review, this court concludes that Biddle’s sentence is not

unreasonable. The district court thoroughly explained its chosen sentence, relied on

and properly weighed appropriate sentencing factors only, and sentenced Biddle to

a prison termthat was within the calculated Guidelines range and the statutory limits. 

See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 460-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (when

reviewing sentences, appellate court applies deferential abuse-of-discretion standard,

first ensuring that district court committed no significant procedural error such as

failing to adequately explain chosen sentence; district court abuses its discretion

when it fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or

irrelevant factor, or considers only appropriate factors but in weighing those factors

commits clear error of judgment; substantive reasonableness of sentence under

abuse-of-discretion standard takes into account totality of circumstances; if sentence

is within Guidelines range, appellate court may, but is not required to, apply

presumption of reasonableness); see also 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) (person who

violates 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) in case involving 50 grams or more of methamphetamine

or 500 grams or more of mixture or substance containing methamphetamine shall be

sentenced to not less than 10 years or more than life in prison).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), this court finds no nonfrivolous issues. This court grants counsel leave to

withdraw, and affirms.

______________________________

-2-