alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TRUST NO. 9150 DATED MARCH 23, 2012 LAND TRUST SERVICE CORPORATION as Trustee, Appellant, v. M & T BANK, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ADVANCED ROOFING, INC., Appellant, v. KWA ENGINEERS, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1815

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 27, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00437

- CV

Mi chael E. GEIGER

, Appellant

v.

Paul A. HAMPEL

, Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CI13615 Honorable Renée Yanta, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant Michael E. Geiger filed a notice of appeal on July 5, 2016. On J uly 6, 2016, the

clerk of this c ourt notified appellant that the required filing fee had not been paid and that the required docketing statement had not been filed. The c lerk further advis ed appellant that if the required filing fee was not paid by July 21, 2016, the matter would be referred to the court.

To date, appellant has failed to pay the applicable filing fee in this appeal. Texas Rule of App ellate Procedure 5 provides,

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rul e by any order that is just.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5.

On July 21, 2016, appellant filed a motion seeking a n extension of forty

- five days to pay his filing fee and to file his docketing statement. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. Appellant’s filing fee and docketing statement are due on August 26, 2016

.

By August 26, 2016 , a ppellant must either (1) pay the applicable filing fee in this appeal

, or (2) provide writt en proof to this court that he i s excused by statute or these rules from paying the filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1 (providing that party who qualifies as indigent under Rule 20 may proceed without advance payment of costs). If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, th is appeal will be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c)._________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of July, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Xcorporeal, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terren S. Peizer,
      Executive Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
                Terren S. Peizer
            Date:
                August 14, 2008Terren
                S. Peizer
              Executive
                Chairman
D.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2425

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Order entered July 1 8 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00807 - CV IN RE SUMMER INFANT (USA), INC., Relator Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law N o. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 14 - 02235 - C



### O RDER Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT relator’s “Motion to Withdraw Petition for Writ of Mandamus” and DISMISS this proceeding

. /s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 24, 2010, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 2, 2011 (the Report), I, David Wagenseller, Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  June 6, 2011/s/ DAVID WAGENSELLERDavid WagensellerVice President and Chief Financial Officer
Xavier David PEREZ, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC d/b/a Champion Mortgage Company, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4643

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. George MCGEE v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0134

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2660 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Brine Electrolysis Ion Exchange 

Apparatus. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Brine Electrolysis Ion 

Exchange Apparatus. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRINE ELECTROLYSIS ION EXCHANGE APPA4 RATUS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Brine Electrolysis Ion Exchange Apparatus (provided 

for in subheading 

8543.30.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2660 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Wilfred Roger FALCON, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2154

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
NO. 07-08 -047 0-CV IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D MA RC H 13, 2 009

_________

_________

_________

___ BRIT T EN CHEY NE, APP ELL ANT

V. TONY A M CW ILLIA MS , AP PELLEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE COU NT Y COUR TAT LAW NO. 1 O F P OT T ERCOU NT Y; NO . 93, 790- 1; H ON ORABLE W . F . “ CO RKY ” RO BER TS, J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRT LE, JJ. ON M OT ION T O D ISM ISS Pendi ng before the C our t i s a moti on of appe ll ant B ri tten Che y ne, i ndi cat ing appel lan t des ires to di smi ss the appeal pursuantto Rul e 42. 1 of the T e x as Rul es of Appel lat e Procedu re . No deci si on of thi s C our t hav ing been del iv ered to date in the a ppeal and findi ng the moti on c omplies wit h the req uirementsof Rul e 42. 1( a) , we g ra nt t he moti on. The appeal i s d is mis sed.2

Hav ing di spos ed of thi s a ppeal at the a ppel lan t’ s req uest , we w ill n o t e n te rt ain a moti on for re hear ing and our mandate sh all i ss ue fort hw it h.

Jam es T . Camp bell Justice
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated February 24, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2110 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-262315) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


February 24, 2022
**EXHIBIT 21** **List of    Subsidiaries of Consolidated Communications Holdings,    Inc.**     Unless otherwise noted, all subsidiaries are 100% owned by    Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.      **Subsidiary** **State of Incorporation**     Consolidated Communications, Inc.       Illinois     Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company      Illinois     Consolidated Communications Acquisition Texas, Inc.       Delaware     Consolidated Communications Ventures Company      Delaware     Consolidated Communications of Texas Company      Texas     Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company      Texas     Consolidated Communications Services Company      Texas     Consolidated Communications Telecom Services of Texas Company      Texas     Consolidated Communications Transport Company      Texas     Consolidated Communications Network Services, Inc.       Delaware     Consolidated Communications Operator Services, Inc.       Delaware     Consolidated Communications Business Systems, Inc.       Delaware     Consolidated Communications Mobile Services, Inc.       Delaware     Consolidated Communications Public Services, Inc.       Illinois     Consolidated Communications Market Response, Inc.       Illinois     North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc.       Pennsylvania     Consolidated Communications of North Pittsburgh, Inc.       Pennsylvania     Pinnatech, Inc.       Pennsylvania     Penn Telecom, Inc.       Pennsylvania     East Texas Fiber Line, Incorporated (63% ownership)      Texas
L.C., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0113

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 09, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2701 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2701

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phenmedipham.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phenmedipham.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHENMEDIPHAM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.76 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Phenmedipham) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2505 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2505

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of 
 benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl-, with 2-aminoethanol and Poly (oxy-1,2-
        ethanediyl), a-[1-oxo-9- octadecenyl]- w-hydroxy-, (9Z).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of 
 benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl-, with 2-aminoethanol and Poly (oxy-1,2-
        ethanediyl), a-[1-oxo-9- octadecenyl]- w-hydroxy-, (9Z).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF BENZENESULFONIC ACID, DODECYL-, WITH 2-
              AMINOETHANOL AND POLY (OXY-1,2-ETHANEDIYL), A-[1-OXO-9- 
              OCTADECENYL]- W-HYDROXY-, (9Z).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.78 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of benzenesulfonic 
acid, dodecyl-, with 2-aminoethanol and Poly (oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-
[1-oxo-9- octadecenyl]- w-hydroxy-, (9Z)) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
P.1 

OAR Box 1191 

Prepped by Candice Davis 

Document Number: 

27) ll-C-1 

Docket Number: 

A-90-27 

Printed 5/13/2008 7:58:47AM Sheet 27 of 51 
P.2 

y

i0 s'"v 

USE; 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2 771 1 

MAR 23 I990 

ir-cMr. Peter H. Wyckoff 

Gardner, Carton & Douglas 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 

Suite 750 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Dear Mr. Wyckoff: 

EPA AIR DOCK 

This is in response to your February 16, 1990 petition on behalf of 

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company requesting that the Environmental 

Protection Agency exempt certain perfluorocarbon compounds from regulation 

under the Clean Air Act as ozone precursors. We have your petition under 

active consideration, which will require discussions between my office and the 

Office of Atmospheric and Indoor Air Programs (OAIAP), as well as other 

interested offices in the Agency. I understand that OAIAP staff have 

contacted you to request more detailed toxicity testing data for some of the 

compounds. Once this is received, we will need to evaluate it and other 

information on stratospheric ozone depletion and global climate change. As 

you know, action on this petition will require decision meetings with Agency 

management and may require development and publication of a Federal Register 

notice. -

We will keep you informed as our review progresses. 

Sincerely, 

/j--Gerald A. Em\)son 

Director 

Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards 

cc: Eileen Claussen 

Gregory Foote 

Matthew PI ache
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the 
ACRS Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Radiation Protection and Nuclear Materials 
will hold a meeting on May 5, 2009, Room T2-B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    The meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Tuesday, May 5, 2009--1 p.m.-5 p.m.
    The Subcommittee will review two Regulatory Guides, RG 1.21, 
``Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactive Material in Liquid 
and Gaseous Effluents, and Solid Waste,'' and RG 4.1, ``Radiological 
Environmental Monitoring for Nuclear Power Plants,'' which are now in 
the process of being finalized. The Subcommittee will hear 
presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC 
staff and other interested persons regarding this matter. The 
Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and 
facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, 
for deliberation by the Full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Neil Coleman, (Telephone: 301-415-7656) five days prior to the meeting, 
if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic 
recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of 
and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the Federal 
Register on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting 
to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: April 8, 2009.
Antonio Dias,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9-8464 Filed 4-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  NL THIS
  CERTIFIES THAT IS THE OWNER OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE
  COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF Chief Financial Officer and
  Secretary Chairman and Chief Executive Officer COMMoN STOCK COMMON STOCK
  NewLink Genetics Corporation transferable on the books of the Corporation by
  the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of
  this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until
  countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the
  facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers. Dated:
  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CUSIP 651511 10 7
  COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC TRANSFER AGENT AND
  REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED OFFICER NewLink Genetics Corporation THIS CERTIFICATE
  IS TRANSFERABLE IN JERSEY CITY, NJ, NEW YORK, NY AND PITTSBURGH, PA SEE
  REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS SPECIMEN 

  






 















	
  

  	
  SIGNATURE(S)
  GUARANTEED: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
  INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT
  UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM),
  PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. TEN COM — as tenants in common TEN ENT — as
  tenants by the entireties JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of
  survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also
  be used though not in the above list. For value received, hereby sell, assign
  and transfer unto THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE
  NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR,
  WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. The following
  abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
  shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
  applicable laws or regulations: NOTICE: Shares PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME
  AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE of the common stock represented by
  the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint to
  transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with
  full power of substitution in the premises. Dated, PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
  SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE PLEASE Initial THe
  appropriate selection For tHis prooF: ok as is ok witH cHanges Make cHanges
  anD senD anotHer prooF UNIF GIFT MIN ACT — Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under
  Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) Attorney ABnote North America 711
  ARMstrong lane colUMBia, tennessee 38401 (931) 388-3003 SALES: HollY groner
  931-490-7660 PROOF OF: FEBRUARY 8, 2011 newlink genetics corporation wo 3170
  Bk OPERATOR: JB new SPECIMEN
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1280

ARLENE J. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES E. OESTERREICHER, President of J.C. Penney Company, Incorporated; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1532-A) Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arlene J. Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Celeste deLorge Flippen, J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plano, Texas; Claude David Convisser, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Arlene J. Hoffman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoffman v. Oesterreicher , No. CA-01-1532-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 7, 2002 & entered Feb. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED