alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017022EN.01002902.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2016 — Tuum v EUIPO — Thun (TUUM)

(Case T-635/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark TUUM - Earlier national figurative mark THUN - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 022/39)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tuum Srl (San Giustino, Italy) (represented by: B. Saguatti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Thun SpA (Bolzano, Italy) (represented by: L. Sergi and G. Muscas, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2015 (Case R 2624/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Thun and Tuum.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 September 2015 (Case R 2624/2014-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 September 2015 (Case R 2624/2014-1);

| 2. | Rejects the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rejects the opposition;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Tuum Srl in the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Tuum Srl in the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal;

| 4. | Orders Thun SpA to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Tuum in the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Thun SpA to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Tuum in the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.

1

---
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Desmond Ross, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Ventures (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                              



| | By:    |                                  
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        | /s/ Desmond Ross                 
| | Name:  | Desmond Ross                     
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | October 1, 2007                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Kirwan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2005 | /s/  DAVID KIRWAN |   |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                          | David Kirwan                |
|                          | *Chief Financial Officer*   |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Fischer Imaging Corporation and will be retained by Fischer ImagingCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
# Official Journal C 23A/23 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 23A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6123 January 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 23A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6123 January 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2018/C 23 A/01 | Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/323/16 — Investigators (AD 7) for the following profiles: 1. Investigators: EU expenditure, anti-corruption; 2. Investigators: Customs and trade, tobacco and counterfeit goods | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2018/C 23 A/01

Reserve lists — Open competition EPSO/AD/323/16 — Investigators (AD 7) for the following profiles: 1. Investigators: EU expenditure, anti-corruption; 2. Investigators: Customs and trade, tobacco and counterfeit goods

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 8.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The following table sets forth, at December 31, 2011, the Registrants subsidiaries and their respective jurisdictions of incorporation.



|                                                            |  |             
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Name                                                        |  | Jurisdiction
|                                                            | 
|Ad-Icon Company Limited                                     |  | Hong Kong   
|Ad-Icon Advertising (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.                    |  | China       
|Beijing Wanshuizhiyuan Advertising Co., Ltd.                |  | China       
|Great Talent Holdings Limited                               |  | Hong Kong   
|Jieli Investment Management Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. |  | China       
|Jieli Network Technology Development (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.   |  | China       
|Qingdao Kaixiang Advertising Co., Ltd.                      |  | China       
|Quanwei Advertising (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.                    |  | China       
|SearchMedia International Limited                           |  | China       
|Shanghai Botang Advertising Co., Ltd.                       |  | China       
|Shenyang Jingli Advertising Co., Ltd.                       |  | China       
|Wuxi Ruizhong Advertising Co., Ltd.                         |  | China       
|Zhejiang Continental Advertising Co, Ltd.                   |  | China
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00106-CV

SINKIN & BARRETTO, P.L.L.C. and Stephanie Bandoske as Personal Representative of the 

Estate of Arthur Gregory Augustine, Deceased,

Appellants

v.

COHESION PROPERTIES, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-00637

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s denial, 

by operation of law, of Appellants’ motion to dismiss under the Texas Citizens Participation Act 

is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this 

opinion. It is ORDERED that Appellants Sinkin & Barretto, P.L.L.C. and Stephanie Bandoske as 

Personal Representative of the Estate of Arthur Gregory Augustine, Deceased, recover their costs 

on appeal from Appellee Cohesion Properties, Ltd. 

SIGNED April 28, 2021.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
# Official Journal L 208/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 208 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6411 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 208

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6411 June 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/830 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on balance sheet item statistics and interest rate statistics of monetary financial institutions (ECB/2021/11) | 1 |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/831 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on statistical information to be reported on financial intermediaries other than monetary financial institutions (ECB/2021/12) | 59 |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/832 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on reporting requirements on payments statistics (ECB/2021/13) | 98 |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/833 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on statistical information to be reported on consolidated banking data (ECB/2021/14) | 109 |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/834 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on statistical information to be reported on securities issues (ECB/2021/15) | 311 |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2021/835 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 repealing Guideline ECB/2014/15 on monetary and financial statistics (ECB/2021/16) | 335 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

GUIDELINES

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/830 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on balance sheet item statistics and interest rate statistics of monetary financial institutions (ECB/2021/11)

1

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/831 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on statistical information to be reported on financial intermediaries other than monetary financial institutions (ECB/2021/12)

59

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/832 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on reporting requirements on payments statistics (ECB/2021/13)

98

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/833 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on statistical information to be reported on consolidated banking data (ECB/2021/14)

109

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/834 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 on statistical information to be reported on securities issues (ECB/2021/15)

311

*

Guideline (EU) 2021/835 of the European Central Bank of 26 March 2021 repealing Guideline ECB/2014/15 on monetary and financial statistics (ECB/2021/16)

335

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE EX REL. Alvin WELCH v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0111

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, *291his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Stuart DELANCY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5179

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 19, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**(Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, Larry C. Oldham, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofParallel Petroleum Corporation (“Parallel”), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q/A of Parallel for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the periodic reportingrequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained inthat Form 10-Q/A Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Parallel.       Dated: May 9, 2006   /s/ Larry C. Oldham             Larry C. Oldham,      President and Chief Executive Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel Petroleum Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2697 

To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethyl dicarbonate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on dimethyl dicarbonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIMETHYL DICARBONATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Dimethyl dicarbonate (CAS 

No. 4525–33–1) (provided 

for in subheading 

2920.90.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2697 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE EX REL. Charles JENKINS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-0249

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS**

PER CURIAM:

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
v237484_ex10-19 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Peter C. Brown,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Marquee Holdings Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: April 16, 2007 |   | /s/ PETER C.  BROWN                                                           |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Peter C. Brown  Chairman of the Board,  Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

----
EXHIBIT
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF
      2002





I,
      Steven
      B. Solomon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      CT
      Holdings Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
      on
      10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of CT Holdings Enterprises, Inc.








By:
      /s/STEVEN B. SOLOMON


Steven
      B.
      Solomon


Chief
      Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer


May
      15,
      2007
Leigh Ann SCHELL and McGready L. Richeson v. KUCHLER POLK SCHELL WEINER & RICHESON, L.L.C.

NO. 2018-CC-0644

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

*1013Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

DESIGNATION OF CHAIR AND VICE

CHAIR OF THE MINOR JUDICIARY EDUCATION BOARD :

:

:

:

: N O

. 465

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11 th day of April, 2022

, Magisterial District Judge Richard G. King is

hereby designated as Chair, and Magisterial District Judge Douglas McCall Bell is

designated as Vice

- Chair

, of the Minor Judiciary Education Board, commencing July 1,

202 2

.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40707 Conference Calendar

__________________ CALVIN WAYNE COPELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus DEWITT COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. V-95-37
- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Calvin Wayne Copeland appeals the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights complaint. Copeland argues that his civil rights were violated because his state-court negligence suit was unsuccessful. Copeland "may not seek a reversal in federal court of the state court judgment simply by recasting his complaint in the form of a civil rights action." Reed v. Terrell , 759 F.2d 472, 473 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 946 (1985).No. 95-40707 -2- This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Copeland is warned that any future frivolous filing will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Copeland should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED