alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chelsey SWEENEY, Appellant, v. Matthew C. SMITH, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Andre PICKETT

NO. 2018-KH-0508

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing *1011that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
# Official Journal C 10/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 10 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5016 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 10

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5016 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 010/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4153 — Toshiba/Westinghouse) (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 010/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4464 — Goldman Sachs/Cerberus/Harpen) (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 010/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4427 — SHV/Mammoet) (1) | 2 |
| 2007/C 010/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4492 — Candover/Ferretti) (1) | 2 |
| 2007/C 010/05 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4413 — Apollo Group/GE Advanced Materials) (1) | 3 |
| 2007/C 010/06 | Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.4439 — Ryanair/AER Lingus) (1) | 4 |
| 2007/C 010/07 | Communication of the Commission concerning the date of mandatory application of the updated inventory and common nomenclature of ingredients employed in cosmetic products (1) | 5 |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2007/C 010/08 | Memorandum of Understanding amending the Memorandum of Understanding on a Code of Conduct for the members of the Governing Council | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 010/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4153 — Toshiba/Westinghouse) (1)

1

2007/C 010/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4464 — Goldman Sachs/Cerberus/Harpen) (1)

1

2007/C 010/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4427 — SHV/Mammoet) (1)

2

2007/C 010/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4492 — Candover/Ferretti) (1)

2

2007/C 010/05

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4413 — Apollo Group/GE Advanced Materials) (1)

3

2007/C 010/06

Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.4439 — Ryanair/AER Lingus) (1)

4

2007/C 010/07

Communication of the Commission concerning the date of mandatory application of the updated inventory and common nomenclature of ingredients employed in cosmetic products (1)

5

European Central Bank

2007/C 010/08

Memorandum of Understanding amending the Memorandum of Understanding on a Code of Conduct for the members of the Governing Council

6

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 010/09 | Euro exchange rates | 8 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 010/09

Euro exchange rates

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 4.01
DESCRIPTION OF COMMON SHARES
 
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares, without par value, of which 117,189,232 are issued and outstanding as at the date of this report. 
​
Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend any meetings of shareholders of the Company and at any meetings of shareholders to one vote for each Common Share held, to receive dividends as and when declared by the directors of the Company and to receive a pro rata share of the assets of the Company available for distribution to the shareholders in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company. There are no pre-emptive, conversion or redemption rights attached to the Common Shares.
Exhibit 32.1 - CEO Certification

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 906
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom L. Kirchner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ TOM KIRCHNER       
|Tom L. Kirchner        
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: May 12, 2008
Derrick A. NEALON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1





Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet,
LLP


Certified Public Accountants and
Consultants





Consent of Independent
Accountants








To the Board of
Directors


China Housing & Land
Development Inc.





We hereby consent to use in this annual
report of Form 10-K, of our
report dated March 26, 2007 with respects to our audit of financial statements
of China Housing and Land Development Inc., and Subsidiaries at December 31,
2006 and related statements of income, shareholders’equity, and cash flows for
theyear ended December 31, 2006 and to the
reference to our firm under the heading “Experts”.





/s/ Moore
Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP


Walnut, California


March 24, 2009








Los Angeles County
Office





1199 S. Fairway Dr., Suite 200 Walnut,
CA 91789 Tel:(909)
594-2713 Fax (909) 594-2357
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lifeline
Systems, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Ronald Feinstein                                          
|                      |  |  |  | Ronald Feinstein                                              
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director               
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Mark G. Beucler                                           
|                      |  |  |  | Mark G. Beucler                                               
|                      |  |  |  | Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUSTIN SEBASTIAN

,

Appellant

v

.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 210

- C R

Appeal from the

396th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1155835D )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Justin Sebastian , has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Rule 42.2(a)

permits an appellate court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the Appellant’s motion at any time

before the C ourt ’ s decision. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.2(a). Because the Appellant has complied with

the requirements of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

February 12, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Pub lish)
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Optionable, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Burchill,
Chief Executive and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




April
      15, 2010
              /s/ Thomas
      F. BurchillThomas
      F. BurchillChief Executive Officer, President and
    Director(Principal Executive Officer)
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2498 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4,4′-oxydiphthalic anhydride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4,4′- 

oxydiphthalic anhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4,4′-OXYDIPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.13 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 4,4′-oxydiphthalic anhydride) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2498 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.7

                                                              SEQUOIA 2004 DEALS

           BANK OF AMERICA, N.A OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 11.20 OF THE AGREEMENTS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A HERETO

            I, H. Randall Chestnut, Senior Vice President of Bank of America,
N.A. (the "Servicer"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.20 of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreements listed on Exhibit I hereto (collectively, the
"Agreements") that: (a) a review of the activities of the Servicer during
calendar year 2004 and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreements
has been made under my supervision, and (b) to the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the
Agreements throughout calendar year 2004.

Dated: March 15, 2005

                                       Bank of America, N.A.
                                           as Servicer

                                       By: /s/  H. Randall Chestnut
                                           ------------------------
                                           Name: H. Randall Chestnut
                                           Title: Senior Vice President

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     EXHIBITS
     --------
<S>      <C>
1.       Sequoia 2004-1
2.       Sequoia 2004-2
3.       Sequoia 2004-3
4.       Sequoia 2004-4
5.       Sequoia 2004-5
6.       Sequoia 2004-6
7.       Sequoia 2004-7
8.       Sequoia 2004-8
9.       Sequoia 2004-9
10.      Sequoia 2004-10
11.      Sequoia 2004-11
12.      Sequoia 2004-12
</TABLE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37872

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY SHANNON

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2011 Unpublishe d Opinion No. 350

Filed: February 10, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial Dist rict, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period

of confinement of two year s , for felony driving under the influence

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Spencer J. Hahn, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G . Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

______________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Michael Anthony Shannon pled guilty to felony driving under the influence . I.C. §§ 18

-

8004, 18

- 8005(6) . In exchange for his guilty plea, a misdemeanor charge as well as an allegation

that Shannon was a persistent violator w ere dismissed. The district co urt sentenced Shannon to a

unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years

. Shannon

appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and t he

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Shannon ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
# Official Journal C 400/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 400 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 582 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 400

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 582 December 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 400/1 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7828 — Ineos / DEA UK E&P Holdings) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 400/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7828 — Ineos / DEA UK E&P Holdings) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 400/2 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,05 % on 1 December 2015 — Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2015/C 400/3 | Commission Decision of 30 November 2015 on public holidays for 2017 for the institutions of the European Union | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 400/4 | Notification by France of the application of Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 concerning the planned modification of traffic distribution rules for the airports Paris Orly, Paris Charles-de-Gaulle, and Paris Le Bourget (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2015/C 400/5 | Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (
  1
  ) | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 400/2

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,05 % on 1 December 2015 — Euro exchange rates

2

2015/C 400/3

Commission Decision of 30 November 2015 on public holidays for 2017 for the institutions of the European Union

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 400/4

Notification by France of the application of Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 concerning the planned modification of traffic distribution rules for the airports Paris Orly, Paris Charles-de-Gaulle, and Paris Le Bourget (
  1
  )

1

4

2015/C 400/5

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO SANTANA-QUINTERO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74678

Agency No. A039-717-782

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Santana-Quintero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

motion to reopen and reconsider on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

MAY 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-74678

discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider and reopen, and review de novo due

process claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). 

We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Santana-Quintero’s motion

to reopen and reconsider because Santana-Quintero failed to establish that the

alleged ineffective assistance of his former attorneys may have affected the

outcome of his proceedings. See id. at 793-94 (to prevail on an ineffective

assistance of counsel claim, a petitioner must demonstrate prejudice); Mielewczyk

v. Holder, 575 F.3d 992, 995-98 (9th Cir. 2009) (a conviction for violating

California Health & Safety Code § 11352 constitutes a removable controlled

substance offense where the record of conviction establishes that the offense

involved cocaine). 

We lack jurisdiction to review Santana-Quintero’s contention that he

qualifies for relief under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed

1996), because he failed to exhaust this claim in his motion to reopen and

reconsider. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of American  Insured  Mortgage  Investors -
Series 85, L.P. (the "Issuer").

I,   Cynthia O. Azzara, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly represents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.


                                     AMERICAN INSURED MORTGAGE
                                     INVESTORS - SERIES 85, L.P.
                                     (Registrant)

                                     By: CRIIMI, Inc.
                                         General Partner



November 14, 2002                    /s/ Cynthia O. Azzara
-----------------                    -------------------------------------------
Date                                 Cynthia O. Azzara
                                     Senior Vice President, Principal Accounting
                                     Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 11.1

                        Registrant: Raster Graphics, Inc.

                Statements of Computation of Net Income Per Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                                                  September 30,           September 30,
                                                               -------------------     -------------------
                                                                1997        1996        1997        1996
                                                               -------     -------     -------     -------
                                                                         (Restated)               (Restated)
<S>                                                            <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>    
Net income                                                     $   889     $   937     $ 3,178     $ 2,069
                                                               -------     -------     -------     -------
Weighted average common shares outstanding                       9,490       5,609       9,384       2,291
Common equivalent shares from convertible preferred stocks         642       1,127         731       2,886
Common equivalent shares from stock options and warrants          --         2,434        --         2,434
Shares related to SAB Nos. 55, 64 and 83                          --          --          --           535
                                                               -------     -------     -------     -------
Shares used in computing net income per share                   10,132       9,170      10,115       8,146
                                                               =======     =======     =======     =======

Net income per share                                           $  0.09     $  0.10     $  0.31     $  0.25
                                                               =======     =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>