Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Notices 17859 

In Table II of this unit, EPA provides 

the following information (to the extent 

that such information is not claimed as 

CBI) on the TMEs received: 

II. 2 TEST MARKETING EXEMPTION NOTICES RECEIVED FROM: 3/1/09 TO 3/20/09 

Case No. Received 

Date 

Projected 

Notice 

End Date 

Manufacturer/Importer Use Chemical 

T–09–0006 03/16/09 04/29/09 Cytec Industries Inc. (G) Coating resin (G) Polymeric substituted 

carbomonocycle, polymer with 

alkylthiol, substituted 

carbomonocycles, and alkyl acrylate-blocked 

T–09–0007 03/16/09 04/29/09 Cytec Industries Inc. (G) Coatings resin (G) Aromatic epoxy diacrylate, polymer with diisocyanate, alkylthiol 

and substituted carbonmonocycles 

In Table III of this unit, EPA provides 

the following information (to the extent 

that such information is not claimed as 

CBI) on the Notices of Commencement 

to manufacture received: 

III. 21 NOTICES OF COMMENCEMENT FROM: 3/1/09 TO 3/20/09 

Case No. Received Date Commencement 

Notice End Date Chemical 

P–08–0002 03/04/09 02/23/09 (S) Benzonitrile, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy- (syringonitrile) 

P–08–0168 03/03/09 02/13/09 (G) Potassium humate, polymer with acrylic monomers 

P–08–0180 03/03/09 02/11/09 (G) Salt of condensation product of cyclic diketone 

P–01–0838 03/16/09 02/18/09 (G) Alcohol, ethoxylated, propoxylated 

P–03–0703 03/10/09 02/20/09 (G) Water redispersible actionic acrylic copolymer 

P–03–0843 03/17/09 03/09/09 (G) Styrene copolymer 

P–04–0192 03/17/09 11/03/08 (G) Alkylthioalkane 

P–07–0627 03/10/09 01/30/09 (G) Acrylic polymer 

P–08–0002 03/04/09 02/23/09 (S) Benzonitrile, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy- (syringonitrile) 

P–08–0168 03/03/09 02/13/09 (G) Potassium humate, polymer with acrylic monomers 

P–08–0180 03/03/09 02/11/09 (G) Salt of condensation product of cyclic diketone 

P–08–0200 03/13/09 02/21/09 (G) Partially fluorinated amphiphilic condensation polymer 

P–08–0239 03/16/09 03/06/09 (G) Alkenyltrialkoxysilane modified polysiloxane 

P–08–0283 03/13/09 03/06/09 (S) Octadecanoic acid, 12-hydroxy-, homopolymer, ester with 1,2,3-propanetriol 

homopolymer 

P–08–0365 03/16/09 02/21/09 (G) Hydrogenated polybutadiene acrylate 

P–08–0649 03/04/09 02/18/09 (G) Organic salt of a polyester polyamine 

P–08–0658 03/06/09 02/18/09 (G) Fatty acids, C18-unsaturated, dimers, polymers with diamines and 

monoacids 

P–08–0683 03/18/09 02/26/09 (G) Ethoxylated maleated triglyceride polymer 

P–08–0738 03/16/09 03/09/09 (S) Magnesium bis[3-[[(carboxy-.kappa.O)methyl] (4-methylphenyl)amino- 

.kappa.N]-2-hydroxypropyl 2-methyl-2-propenoato]-, (T-4)-* 

P–09–0074 03/16/09 03/09/09 (S) Butanedioic acid, methylene-, polymer with (2Z)-2-butenedioic acid and 2- 

propenoic acid 

P–09–0079 03/11/09 02/27/09 (G) Polyester resin 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Chemicals, 

Premanufacturer notices. 

Dated: March 31, 2009. 

Chandler Sirmons, 

Acting Director, Information Management 

Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and 

Toxics. 

[FR Doc. E9–8875 Filed 4–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8592–4] 

Environmental Impact Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–1399 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements 

Filed 04/06/2009 through 04/10/2009 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9 

EIS No. 20090112, Draft EIS, NPS, 00, 

Long Walk National Historic Trail 

Feasibility Study, To Evaluate the 

Suitability and Feasibility of 

Designating the Routes, 

Implementation, Apache, Coconino, 

Navajo Counties, AZ; Bernalillo, 

Cibola, De Baca, Guadalupe, Lincoln, 

McKinley, Mora, Otero, Santa Fe, 

Sandoval, Torrance, Valencia 

Counties, NM, Comment Period Ends: 

06/16/2009, Contact: Sharon Brown, 

505–988–6717. 

EIS No. 20090113, Draft EIS, AFS, 00, 

Ashley National Forest Motorized 

Travel Plan, To Improve Management 

of Public Summer Motorized Use by 

Designating Roads and Motorized 

Trails and Limiting Dispersed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

17860 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Notices 

Camping to Areas, Duchesne, Daggett, 

Uintah Counties, Utah and 

Sweetwater County, Wyoming, 

Comment Period Ends: 06/01/2009, 

Contact: Lesley Tullis, 435–781–5137. 

EIS No. 20090114, Third Final 

Supplement, COE, CA, Port of Los 

Angeles Channel Deepening Project, 

To Dispose of Approximately 3.0 

Million Cubic Yards of Dredge 

Material Required to Complete the 

Channel Deepening Project and to 

Beneficially Reuse the Dredge 

Material with the Port of Los Angeles, 

Los Angeles County, CA, Wait Period 

Ends: 05/18/2009, Contact: Joy 

Jaiswal, 213–452–3851. 

EIS No. 20090115, Draft EIS, SFW, 00, 

Western Snowy Plover Habitat 

Conservation Plan, Proposed Issuance 

of an Incidental Take Permit, Oregon 

Parks and Recreation Department, 

Oregon Coast, OR, CA, WAS, 

Comment Period Ends: 06/16/2009, 

Contact: Laura Todd, 541–867–4558. 

EIS No. 20090116, Final EIS, AFS, WY, 

Spruce Gulch Bark Beetle and Fuels 

Reduction Project, Proposes to 

Implement Bark Beetle Related 

Salvage and SuppressionVegetative 

Treatments and Hazardous Fuels 

Abatement Treatments, Laramie 

Ranger District, Medicine Bow-Routt 

National Forests, Albany and Carbon 

Counties, WY, Wait Period Ends: 05/ 

18/2009, Contact: Melissa Martin, 

307–745–2371. 

Amended Notices 

EIS No. 20090100, Draft EIS, BLM, UT, 

Withdrawn—Mona to Oquirrh 

Transmission Corridor Project, 

Construction, Operation, Maintenance 

and Decommissioning a DoubleCircuit 500/345 Kilovolt (Kv) 

Transmission Line, Right-of-Way 

Grant, Rocky Mountain Power, Juab, 

Salt Lake, Tooele and Utah Counties, 

UT, Comment Period Ends: 07/08/ 

2009, Contact: Megan Crandall, 801– 

539–4061. 

Revision to FR Notice Published 04/ 

10/2009: Officially Withdrawn by the 

Preparing Agency. 

EIS No. 20090104, Draft EIS, BIA, NY, 

Withdrawn—Cayuga Indian Nation of 

New York Conveyance of Land into 

Trust Project, Approval of a 125+ 

Acre Fee-to-Trust Property Transfer of 

Seven Separate Parcel located in the 

Village of Union Springs and Town of 

Springport and Montequma in Cayuga 

County and the Town of Seneca Falls 

in Seneca County, NY, Comment 

Period Ends: 05/26/2009, Contact: 

Kurt G. Chandler, 615–564–6832. 

Revision to FR Notice Published 04/ 

10/2009: Officially Withdrawn by the 

Preparing Agency. 

Dated: April 14, 2009. 

Ken Mittelholtz, 

Environmental Protection Specialist, NEPA 

Compliance Division, Office of Federal 

Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–8857 Filed 4–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

ER–FRL–8592–5] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7146. 

Summary of Rating Definitions 

Environmental Impact of the Action 

LO—Lack of Objections 

The EPA review has not identified 

any potential environmental impacts 

requiring substantive changes to the 

proposal. The review may have 

disclosed opportunities for application 

of mitigation measures that could be 

accomplished with no more than minor 

changes to the proposal. 

EC—Environmental Concerns 

The EPA review has identified 

environmental impacts that should be 

avoided in order to fully protect the 

environment. Corrective measures may 

require changes to the preferred 

alternative or application of mitigation 

measures that can reduce the 

environmental impact. EPA would like 

to work with the lead agency to reduce 

these impacts. 

EO—Environmental Objections 

The EPA review has identified 

significant environmental impacts that 

must be avoided in order to provide 

adequate protection for the 

environment. Corrective measures may 

require substantial changes to the 

preferred alternative or consideration of 

some other project alternative 

(including the no action alternative or a 

new alternative). EPA intends to work 

with the lead agency to reduce these 

impacts. 

EU—Environmentally Unsatisfactory 

The EPA review has identified 

adverse environmental impacts that is of 

sufficient magnitude that they are 

unsatisfactory from the standpoint of 

public health or welfare or 

environmental quality. EPA intends to 

work with the lead agency to reduce 

these impacts. If the potentially 

unsatisfactory impacts are not corrected 

at the final EIS stage, this proposal will 

be recommended for referral to the CEQ. 

Adequacy of the Impact Statement 

Category 1—Adequate 

EPA believes the draft EIS adequately 

sets forth the environmental impact(s) of 

the preferred alternative and those of 

the alternatives reasonably available to 

the project or action. No further analysis 

or data collection is necessary, but the 

reviewer may suggest the addition of 

clarifying language or information. 

Category 2—Insufficient Information 

The draft EIS does not contain 

sufficient information for EPA to fully 

assess environmental impacts that 

should be avoided in order to fully 

protect the environment, or the EPA 

reviewer has identified new reasonably 

available alternatives that is within the 

spectrum of alternatives analyzed in the 

draft EIS, which could reduce the 

environmental impacts of the action. 

The identified additional information, 

data, analyses, or discussion should be 

included in the final EIS. 

Category 3—Inadequate 

EPA does not believe that the draft 

EIS adequately assesses potentially 

significant environmental impacts of the 

action, or the EPA reviewer has 

identified new, reasonably available 

alternatives that is outside of the 

spectrum of alternatives analyzed in the 

draft EIS, which should be analyzed in 

order to reduce the potentially 

significant environmental impacts. EPA 

believes that the identified additional 

information, data, analyses, or 

discussions are of such a magnitude that 

they should have full public review at 

a draft stage. EPA does not believe that 

the draft EIS is adequate for the 

purposes of the NEPA and/or Section 

309 review, and thus should be formally 

revised and made available for public 

comment in a supplemental or revised 

draft EIS. On the basis of the potential 

significant impacts involved, this 

proposal could be a candidate for 

referral to the CEQ. 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20080523, ERP No. D–BLM– 

J03022–00, UNEV Pipeline Project, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES