alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Annual Report of Getting  Ready  Corporation  (the
'Company')  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'),  each
of the  undersigned  officers  of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbaenes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to such officer's knowledge: Section 13(a)

      (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) of
      Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934: and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

      In accordance  with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following  persons on behalf of the  registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.


                                        GETTING READY CORPORATION


Date: December 16, 2005                 By: /s/ Sheldon R. Rose
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                Sheldon R. Rose
                                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement(Form S-8No. 333-122664)pertaining to the 2001 and 2005 Equity Incentive Plans and 2005Employee Stock Purchase Plan of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc. ofour report dated February 3, 2006 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of optionsXpress Holdings,Inc. included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2005; and our report includedin the following paragraph with respect to the financialstatement schedules of optionsXpress Holdings, Inc.     Our audits also included the financial statement schedules ofoptionsXpress Holdings, Inc. listed in Item 15(a). Theseschedules are the responsibility of optionsXpress Holdings,Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express anopinion based on our audit. In our opinion, as to which the dateis February 3, 2006, the financial statement schedulereferred to above, when considered in relation to the basicfinancial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in allmaterial respects the information set forth therein.     /s/ Ernst & Young    LLP      Chicago, IllinoisMarch 29, 2006
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the
"Company for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas J. Bisko, President and CEO, of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


Date:    May 14, 2003                                    By: /s/ Thomas J. Bisko
         ------------                                    ---------------------
                                                         Thomas J. Bisko
                                                         President and CEO
Raymond ADAMS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-465

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to**
 **18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **as
        Adopted Pursuant to**
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Report”) of Supcor, Inc.,
        now known as Shineco, Inc., (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,
        2004, the undersigned, Yuying Zhang, President and Chief Executive Officer,
        hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
        undersigned’s knowledge and belief:
 
 ·
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 ·
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  
 Dated: 
        November 10, 2006
 
 
 /s/
        Yuying Zhang
 Yuying
        Zhang, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
  
 This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
        Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Amtsblatt C 38A/4. F

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 38A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 58. Jahrgang4. Februar 2015 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 38A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

58. Jahrgang4. Februar 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 038A/01 | Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/272/13 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) deutscher Sprache (DE) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2015/C 038A/01

Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/272/13 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (AD 7) deutscher Sprache (DE)

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

V Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

| 4.2.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 38/1

---

RESERVELISTE (1)

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/AD/272/13

RECHTS- UND SPRACHSACHVERSTÄNDIGE (AD 7) DEUTSCHER SPRACHE (DE)

(2015/C 038 A/01)

| BERTELMANN | Bernd Steffen |
| --- | --- |
| ERNST | Ulrich |
| KAELLER | Anja |
| PÖLSLER | Daniel Gerd |
| SALIA | Esther Massa |
| SCHMID-DRÜNER | Marion |
| SCHMIDT | Andreas Johannes |
| SCHONGER | Michael |
| SCHWEDA | Sebastian |
| SCHWEIKARDT | Stephan |
| ULBRICH | Eva |
| WIEMANN | Joachim |

BERTELMANN

Bernd Steffen

ERNST

Ulrich

KAELLER

Anja

PÖLSLER

Daniel Gerd

SALIA

Esther Massa

SCHMID-DRÜNER

Marion

SCHMIDT

Andreas Johannes

SCHONGER

Michael

SCHWEDA

Sebastian

SCHWEIKARDT

Stephan

ULBRICH

Eva

WIEMANN

Joachim

Die Reserveliste gilt bis zum 23. Dezember 2017.

---

(1)  Auf ausdrücklichen Wunsch einer erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmerin oder eines erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmers wird ihr bzw. sein Name nicht veröffentlicht.

---
attestationh1216.htm



Back to Form 8-K




Medicare Advantage Attestation of Benefit Plan 


 


HARMONY HEALTH PLAN OF ILLINOIS, INC. 


 


H1216







I attest that I have examined the Plan Benefit Packages (PBPs) identified below and that the benefits identified in the PBPs are those that the above-stated organization will make available to eligible beneficiaries in the approved service area during program year 2012. I further attest that we have reviewed the bid pricing tools (BPTs) with the certifying actuary and have determined them to be consistent with the PBPs being attested to here.









I further attest that these benefits will be offered in accordance with all applicable Medicare program authorizing statutes and regulations and program guidance that CMS has issued to date and will issue during the remainder of 2011 and 2012, including but not limited to, the 2012 Call Letter, the 2012 Solicitations for New Contract Applicants, the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Manual, the Medicare Managed Care Manual, and the CMS memoranda issued through the Health Plan Management System (HPMS).


 




	
Plan 


ID

	
Segment


ID

	
Version

	
Plan Name

	
Plan 


Type

	
Transaction 


Type

	
MA 


Premium

	
Part D 


Premium

	
CMS Approval 


Date

	
Effective 


Date


	
001

	
0

	
7

	
WellCare Value (HMO-


POS)

	
HMOPOS

	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
0.00

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12


	
003

	
0

	
8

	
WellCare Access 


(HMO SNP)

	
HMO

	
Renewal

	
0.00

	
28.10

	
09/02/11

	
01/01/12









 


 


 


 




	 	 	 	 H1216





                                                                         






  





  











  








 


 


 



	
THOMAS TRAN


 

	 	 9/1/2011 10:45:27 AM	 
	
 


Contracting Official Name 

	 	 Date	 



 


 


 


 




	
HARMONY HEALTH PLAN OF ILLINOIS, INC.


 

	 	
23 Public Square


Suite 400


Belleville, IL 62220


 

	 
	
 


Organization 

	 	
 


Address

	 





                    


 


 


 


 


                                                         


	 	 	 	 H1216
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial  statements of Ray Ellison Mortgage Acceptance Corp. at June 30,2000
and is qualified in its  entirety by  reference  to such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         754591
<NAME>                        Ray Ellison Mortgage Acceptance Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          1,537
<SECURITIES>                    59,444,002
<RECEIVABLES>                   342,418
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                343,955
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  65,314,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           370,650
<BONDS>                         62,855,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                      2,079,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    65,314,867
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,252,211
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,381,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                95,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              2,124,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 46,466
<INCOME-TAX>                    15,798
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             30,668
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    30,668
<EPS-BASIC>                   3.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                   3.06


</TABLE>
Javier OCAMPO and Dennis Ordonez v. Nicole MARONGE

NO. 2018-C-0314

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2560 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2560

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain bags for toys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain bags for toys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DUTY SUSPENSION ON CERTAIN BAGS FOR TOYS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.78 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain bags for toys) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Thomas Louis DYCUS, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                           4,450
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,916
<INVENTORY>                                     37,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,190
<PP&E>                                          38,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,190
<BONDS>                                         15,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,445
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,686
<SALES>                                         14,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,963
<CGS>                                            6,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (716)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,073)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,073)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Education Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Trust”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall H. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Trust, certify, in my capacity as an officer of the Trust, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| |                                                                                                                             
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




| |                                                                                                                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.




Date: February 28, 2013/s/ Randall H. BrownRandall H. BrownChief Financial Officer





In accordance with SEC Release NO. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
#### William BAUMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden; et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 03-56768.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

*776William Baumer, Corcoran, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Atty. Gen. CAS, Heather L. Bushman, DAG, San Diego, CA, for RespondentsAppellees. '

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

William Baumer, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court’s denial of a habeas corpus petition, *see Harris v. Vasquez,*949 F.2d 1497, 1510 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm.

Baumer contends that he was denied due process because the prison violated its state regulations, which govern notice of misconduct charges. This contention fails. Baumer received all the process that was due: written notice of the charge; a statement of the evidence relied on by prison officials and reasons for disciplinary action; and the opportunity to call witnesses and present evidence. *See Wolff v. McDonnell,*418 U.S. 539, 563-66, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). Even if the prison did not follow state procedures, the contention fails because federal due process does not require a prison to comply with its own, more generous procedures. *See Walker v. Sumner,*14 F.3d 1415, 1420 (9th Cir.1994), *abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v. Conner,*515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Adam BURNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-63

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Marco M. TORRES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Officer HALL, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0843

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 02, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Certiorari is denied.
Lemuel TORRE-CRUZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3110

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Larry D. JONES, DOC# 669312, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-255

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. David WILSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-0319

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS**

PER CURIAM:

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23

- 0728 GBSB HOLDING, LLC, Plaint iff and Appellant,

v. FLATHEAD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND FLATHEAD COUNTY, M ONTANA; WHITEFISH VILLAGE, LLC; WILLIAM F. OSWALD AND JULIANA M. OSWALD, Co

- Trustee s of the Oswald Family Trust dated May 23, 2016; SHAWN PATRICK JAMES AND KRISTIN PATRICIA BELL; WHITEFISH HILLS VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, NC.; and JOHN DOES 1 AND 2, Defendants and Appellees.

Defendants/Appellants. Pursuant to the auth

ori ty granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26( 1 ), the Appellant is granted an extensio n of time up to and including April 17, 2024 , to prepare, file and serve the Appe llant ’ s opening br ie f. ELETORNICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 14 2024

03/14/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0728
NO. 07-04-0368-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	OCTOBER 20, 2004

	______________________________

	LUBBOCK GATEWOOD, L.L.C., APPELLANT

	V.

	MCGATEWOOD, L.C., APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 72ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2003-523,936; HONORABLE BLAIR CHERRY, JR., JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	On October 18, 2004, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal.  No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.   All costs incurred are adjudged against the party incurring the same.    

							James T. Campbell

						    	        Justice