alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 324A/14 S

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 324A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6614 September 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 324A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6614 September 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2023/C 324 A/01 | Notice of open competitions – EPSO/AD/404/23 – English-language (EN) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/405/23 – Spanish-language (ES) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/406/23 – Lithuanian-language (LT) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/407/23 – Dutch-language (NL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/408/23 – Portuguese-language (PT) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/409/23 – Slovak-language (SK) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2023/C 324 A/01

Notice of open competitions – EPSO/AD/404/23 – English-language (EN) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/405/23 – Spanish-language (ES) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/406/23 – Lithuanian-language (LT) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/407/23 – Dutch-language (NL) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/408/23 – Portuguese-language (PT) lawyer-linguists (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/409/23 – Slovak-language (SK) lawyer-linguists (AD 7)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 906CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, TomL. Kirchner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jon Correio, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 
/s/ TOM L KIRCHNER/s/ JON CORREIOTom L. KirchnerJon Correio
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 9, 2004Date: November 9, 2004
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-191881) and Form S-8 (No. 333-126978) of Manitex International, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2014 ,
relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013.



|            |  | 
|----------- |  | 
|/s/ UHY LLP |  | 
|UHY LLP     |  | 

Sterling Heights, Michigan

October 15, 2014
Exhibit 32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Valley Commerce Bancorp
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Donald A.
Gilles, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

March 30, 2005


                                                 /s/ Donald A. Gilles
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                   Donald A. Gilles
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       89
Carole BRODY, Appellant, v. Arthur S. TURKISH, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1050

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018

Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., and Bruce A. Katzen and Josh M. Rubens ; Samson Appellate Law and Daniel M. Samson, for appellant.

Mark Migdal & Hayden and Joshua A. Migdal ; Ross & Girten and Lauri Waldman Ross and Theresa L. Girten, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Salta Inv. Co. v. Silva*, 584 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
##### 



Exhibit 99.2
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
BLUELINX CORPORATION SALARIED SAVINGS PLAN
  W I T N E S S E T H :




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



(1)
    
    Expenses for (or necessary to obtain) medical care that would be
deductible under Code section 213(d) (determined without regard to whether the
expenses exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income);(2)
    
    Costs directly related to the purchase (excluding mortgage payments) of
a principal residence for the Participant;(3)
    
    The payment of tuition, related educational fees and room and board
expenses for up to the next twelve months of post-secondary education for the
Participant, the Participants spouse, children or dependents (as defined in
Code Section 152, and, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005,
without regard to Code Section 152(b)(1), (b)(2) or (d)(1)(B));(4)
    
    Payments necessary to prevent the eviction of the Participant from the
Participants principal residence or foreclosure on the mortgage of that
residence;(5)
    
    Payments for burial or funeral expenses for the Participants deceased
parent, Spouse, children or dependents (as defined in Code Section 152, and,
for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005, without regard to Code
section 152(d)(1)(B));
 3




---



##### 



(6)
    
    Expenses for the repair of damage to the Participants principal
residence that would qualify for the casualty deduction under Code Section 165
(determined without regard to whether the loss exceeds 10% of adjusted gross
income); or(7)
    
    Any other financial need which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
through the publication of revenue rulings, notices and other documents of
general applicability, may from time to time designate as a deemed immediate
and heavy financial need.
         4




---



##### 



provided however
    BLUELINX CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Barbara V. TinsleyName:
    Barbara V. TinsleyTitle:
    General Counsel & Secretary 5
Victor BERRONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2193

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael BRUENS, Patrice Bruens, Arduino Marinelli, Marianne Marinelli, Karim Alimi, Soula Kassidi Family Trust and 227 Beach Boulevard Limited Partnership, Appellants, v. Q CLUB HOTEL, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1053

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2269
<SECURITIES>                                        87
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7324
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1135
<INVENTORY>                                         59
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10345
<PP&E>                                           60813
<DEPRECIATION>                                   48679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   22653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5806
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           576
<OTHER-SE>                                       16271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     22653
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9730
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     7424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2435
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37872

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY SHANNON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 350

Filed: February 10, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of two years, for felony driving under the influence, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Spencer J. Hahn, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

______________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Michael Anthony Shannon pled guilty to felony driving under the influence. I.C. §§ 18-

8004, 18-8005(6). In exchange for his guilty plea, a misdemeanor charge as well as an allegation 

that Shannon was a persistent violator were dismissed. The district court sentenced Shannon to a 

unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Shannon

appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Shannon’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

OLGA SEGREAVES,

Respondent

v.

ROSS SEGREAVES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 240 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-31198

Summary Calendar

 

ERIN HUNTER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden, 

Louisiana State Penitentiary,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-770-R

--------------------

January 14, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Erin Hunter, Louisiana prisoner # 111799, appeals the district

court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. A

judge on this court granted Hunter a certificate of appealability

(COA) on two issues: (1) whether the state withheld Vanessa

Causey’s grand jury testimony from Hunter in violation of Brady v.

Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and (2) whether trial counsel

rendered ineffective assistance by not adequately cross-examining

Causey and not introducing evidence necessary to impeach Causey.

Hunter presents argument on several other issues. Because COA was
No. 00-31198

-2-

not granted on these issues, we may not consider them. See 28

U.S.C. § 2253; see also Lackey v. Johnson, 116 F.3d 149, 151-52

(5th Cir. 1997). 

The state court adjudicated the Brady issue on its merits.

See State v. Hunter, 648 So. 2d 1025, 1033-34 (La. Ct. App. 1994).

Accordingly, Hunter can receive relief on this claim only by

showing that the state court acted objectively unreasonably in

denying this claim. See Nobles v. Johnson, 127 F.3d 409, 416 (5th

Cir. 1997); Trevino v. Johnson, 168 F.3d 173, 181 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 527 U.S. 1056 (1999); Orman v. Cain, 228 F.3d 616, 621 (5th

Cir. 2000). Hunter has not made this showing. 

The state court also adjudicated on the merits the

ineffective-assistance issue as to Hunter’s allegations regarding

counsel’s not using portions of the initial police report to

impeach Causey. See Hunter, 648 So. 2d at 1030-31. Thus, as with

his Brady issue, Hunter can receive relief on this issue only if he

can show that the state court acted objectively unreasonably in

denying this claim. See Bryant v. Scott, 28 F.3d 1411, 1414 (5th

Cir. 1994); Nobles, 127 F.3d at 416; Orman, 228 F.3d at 621. Also

as with his Brady issue, Hunter had not made the requisite showing

of objective unreasonableness in relation to this ineffectiveassistance claim.

Hunter also argues that counsel rendered ineffective

assistance by not introducing other documents and using them to

cross-examine Causey. This claim was not considered by the state

court and thus receives de novo review. See Nobles, 127 F.3d at

416. Hunter has not shown that counsel’s cross-examination of
No. 00-31198

-3-

Causey was deficient or that this cross-examination prejudiced

Hunter’s defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687

(1984). 

Hunter has not shown that he is entitled to relief on his

Brady or ineffective-assistance claims. Accordingly, the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Kevin DESALLE

NO. 2017-KP-0024

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant and reinstate trial court ruling.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-48 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName:
    
    Nancy H. ForteTitle:
    
    Assistant Vice President
 Date: March 29, 2005
OFFlCE OF THE ATTORNEY **GENERAL** OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Bonor'able

J. Watt Page The AdfutantGsao~al Austin, l'oxae Dear 8ir1

Your 1088er

a State Rapweont vnltwl stator 'id Ofti690.Honorable T. Watt Page - Page 2

&rine Corps, retiredwarrant ottioera and retired enlisted man of the Vnited States Army, Navy and MarIn Corps.

A;e these oonstitutional amendmentshave been son- &rued by our Supreme Court, e peraon holding a State oriioe and at the aami tlma oooupyingona of the atatusas mentioned above retains suoh statuswhile in the aatfva m$litary servloe or the Vnited Statee undar an order of lnduotlonoperatingupon him aa a member'oi one of the olasaeenamed in the provisos to Artlolo 16, **Seot$onr** 3) and I&, **and** they thereroramay retain a Stata office and oolleot the oompensatlon attadhlngthereto. aarpenter v. Sheppard,45 **S. W.**  (2d) 5621 Spwwb v. shappar& 150 5. 8. (26) 769. (Whileboth or these deoi8iohaaon**oorned** orrioers or the NationalGuard lnduotsdaa moh into the aotivemilitary servioe or the Vnltqd SW&em, the reasoningapplieswith equal roroo 'teeach or the other oategorleslieted in the amendments to Artlolti~li, **seotfonm** 33 and ItO, or the'Uon+tutiOn.)

=.a State Repreeentativo ir not a aeaber Of sny or the alasmoonaaed, but enters the Vnited **8ta0e8** Am, his situation will be as tollowar Ii he is oommiesioned a8 an otr16er in the'bry or the United Stateshe will upon aooeptanoe Or .Cht Ofrioe under the United States **ipso** rioto vaoatr hla.Gtate 

### 0rri00, by ior or the provisions0r Artlole 16; SbotZon 12, or the Oonetitutlon.

Ir he enters the Amy of the Vnitsd States,but 18 not **aade** e+n @rioor in that Am, ha will not vaoate him State orfioa but Uuring the.timehe s.rvW iCtho Ax-u he will not be entitledto booelve from the State oi Texas **pay ror**  aerviee render+ as a member oi the,LegSalatW*, by rorae or that portion or Artlqle 16,,Sootion33, oi~the 

### oOnfjtitution, whioh prohibitsthe aooountlngorrioere or this State irom drawing or paging wemrante upon the'Stat* Traasuq for salary or oompelleation to = State oriiaer who holds et the came time a "positioncchonor, tryt, or profit" under the Federal guvernment.

FEB 5; 1942 Youra Averytruly /9 .D ATTORNBY f.+‘$BjlwAL

OF !tZXAS

Br R. W. Fair6hild
# Official Journal C 344/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.344.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 344 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5317 December 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.344.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 344

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5317 December 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 344/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 344/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Tommie Lee SCURRY, DOC #379001, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BREON LAWRENCE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 245 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# Official Journal C 440/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 440 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 579 December 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 440

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 579 December 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 440/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2014/C 440/02 | Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision 2014/699/EU | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 440/01

Euro exchange rates

1

2014/C 440/02

Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision 2014/699/EU

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 440/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7379 — Mylan/Abbott EPD-DM) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 440/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7379 — Mylan/Abbott EPD-DM) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN