alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000751255
<NAME>                             DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1985-1 LIMITED PTRSHP
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                 24,154
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          57,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       81,999
<PP&E>                             20,980,422
<DEPRECIATION>                     20,846,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        229,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  26,886
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            179,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          229,987
<SALES>                                95,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       95,814
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          53,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        42,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    42,618
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           42,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           10.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>
Robert JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE 
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FORM 10-Q/A, WHICH IS ATTACHED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000752634
<NAME>                        EARTH SEARCH SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             31,257
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     214,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  961,835
<PP&E>                                          3,920,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                    207,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5,066,013 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,134,010
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                     1,000,000
<COMMON>                                       90,395,931
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    5,066,013
<SALES>                                           636,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  636,906
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    (846,788)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (513,438)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,492,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,492,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,492,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
Victor ARVELO, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1599

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 14

- 00077

- CV

NGA LY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF

ASHLEY LY TRUONG AND THE ESTATE OF TIFFAN Y LY TRU O NG , Appellant

V.

DAVID NGUYEN, AKA HU NG QUOC NGUYEN, A/K/ A NGUYEN HUNG QUOC; HOA THI TRAN, A/K/A THUAN TUAN TRAN, A/K /A HOA NGUYEN; TRAN DIEM THUY; DIEM TRAN; AND SAINT JOSEPH VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellee s

Appeal from the 127th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2008

- 17570 ).

TO THE 127TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS :

Before this Court , on the 19th day of March 2015 , the case upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on December 4, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the tria l court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Nga Ly,

I ndividually and as Administrator of the Estate of Ashley LyTruong and the Estate of Tiffany Ly Tru o ng, pay all appellate

costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered March 19, 2015

.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice Higley.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU t o observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

May 29, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

NINA SOLONENKO

, Appellant,

v.

VOGUE PROPERTIES, LLC

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 722

[ February 1, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Barbara A. McCarthy , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE14

- 019075(21)

.

Andrey Solonenko, Esq., Miramar, for appellant.

Gerald Schilian of Schilian & Watarz, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,980,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,130
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,076,721
<PP&E>                                      55,746,290
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,369,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,531,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,917,824
<BONDS>                                     10,577,610
<COMMON>                                       178,091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,852,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,531,533
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,695,381
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,652,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (12,181)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             372,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,682,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                   885,372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,797,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,797,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .098
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .098
        


</TABLE>
Thelonius PRINCE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-4506

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2017

Thelonius Prince, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as untimely filed. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ricardo Bernardes, certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that
entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: July 27, 2006



By:

/s/ Ricardo BernardesRicardo BernardesExecutive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-KSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





By:/s/ David
Zaikin


David
Zaikin


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)






July 16,
2008
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3296-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Massachusetts; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA-3296-EM), dated December 13, 
2008, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: December 18, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective December 18, 2008.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-8387 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Felix Sylvester VANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4662

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31A

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey W. Sass, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on Form  10-KSB  of  Connected  Media
Technologies, Inc. f/k./a Trust Licensing, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

September 30, 2005

/s/ Jeffrey W. Sass
-------------------------------------
Jeffrey W. Sass
President and Chief Executive Officer
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 38I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 038I |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 643 lutego 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 038I

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 643 lutego 2021

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Ogłoszenia |
| | POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE |
| | Rada |
| 2021/C 38 I/01 | Ogłoszenie o odwołaniu konkursu | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

V   Ogłoszenia

POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE

Rada

2021/C 38 I/01

Ogłoszenie o odwołaniu konkursu

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

V Ogłoszenia

POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE

Rada

| 3.2.2021 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CI 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2021

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CI 38/1

---

OGŁOSZENIE O ODWOŁANIU KONKURSU

(2021/C 38 I/01)

Odwołane zostaje ogłoszenie w Dzienniku Urzędowym Unii Europejskiej (1) o naborze CONS/AD/167/21.

---

(1)  Dz.U. C 29 A z 26.1.2021, s. 1.

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

BEN RAY YODER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3515 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 24, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Ben Ray Yoder, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                        0
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         406,776
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      17,310
<OTHER-SE>                    (424,086)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  0
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              (116,032)
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (116,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (116,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (116,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.067)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        


</TABLE>
Darius Vashon STILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-940

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1117

In re: ANTJUANE GLENTO DILWORTH , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 1:04

- cr
- 00412

- CCE

- 1 )

Submitted : May 28, 2020 Decided: June 4, 2020

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Antjuane Glento Dilworth , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antjuane Glento Dilworth petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion

. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket
reveals that the district court has now acted on his motion

. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Dilworth ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We di spense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
NEEB SERVICE, LLC f/k/a Neeb Service, Inc. v. Norman S. FOSTER, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Finance of the City of New Orleans, Department of Finance, Enroll G. Williams, Assessor, Orleans Parish Assessor, Louisiana Tax Commission

NO. 2018-C-0336

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

Denied.