alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Mimi Villegas GALDI, aka Beatriz Marta Villegas, Mimi Beatriz Galdi, and Mirta Beatriz Garman, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-50285.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 2004.*

Decided May 13, 2004.

Ronald L. Cheng, Esq.; Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Joey L. Blanch, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy FPD, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: RYMER and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,** Chief District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, Chief District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Defendant Mimi Galdi appeals her dis*147trict court conviction on two counts of sending threats through the mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876.

1. Defendant first contends that neither of the two letters that underlie her conviction contained true threats, but were instead “hyperbolic” or “rhetorical” expressions of anger, or else were too “ambiguous” to be true threats. On an independent review of the whole record, *United States v. Hanna,*293 F.3d 1080, 1088 (9th Cir.2002), we hold that the February and March 2002 letters constituted true threats under § 876. A reasonable person would foresee that the statements - including statements that the victim’s budding will be bombed - would be interpreted by those to whom the maker communicates the statement as a serious expression of intent to harm or assault him. *See Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. Am. Coalition of Life Activists,*290 F.3d 1058, 1074 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc) (citing standards).

2. Defendant also argues that the evidence of her specific intent to threaten, when she drafted and mailed the letters, was insufficient. We disagree. Defendant testified at trial about the letters. She conceded that she had sent the letters “to get attention” and to “suggest” to the victim that he should give in to her demands.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *147courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT WILLIAM URWIN, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 400 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 32.1   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Nicholas Keating, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. August 05, 2008  /s/ C. NICHOLAS KEATING, JR. 
C. Nicholas Keating, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.2








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3ASR (No. 333-183790), Form S-3 (No. 333-131284), and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-173932, 333-167918 and 333-136145) of Education Realty Trust, Inc. of our report dated April 1, 2013, relating to the financial statements of University Village – Greensboro, LLC as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Education Realty Trust, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012.











/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP


Memphis, Tennessee





April 1, 2013











1
Exhibit 21
 Subsidiaries of Horizon Lines, Inc.
  Name of Subsidiary
    
    JurisdictionHorizon Lines Holding Corp.
    
    DelawareHawaii Stevedores, Inc.
    
    HawaiiHorizon Logistics Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareHorizon Lines, LLC
    
    DelawareHorizon Lines of Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    DelawareHorizon Lines of Alaska, LLC
    
    DelawareHorizon Lines of Guam, LLC
    
    DelawareHorizon Lines Vessels, LLC
    
    DelawareH-L Distribution Service, LLC
    
    DelawareHorizon Logistics, LLC
    
    DelawareAero Logistics, LLC
    
    DelawareSea-Logix, LLC
    
    DelawareHorizon Services Group, LLC
    
    DelawareChenega Logistics, LLC
    
    Alaska
# Official Journal C 2/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 587 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 2

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 587 January 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 002/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,05 % on 1 January 2015 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 002/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,05 % on 1 January 2015 — Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 002/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7486 — Ingram Micro/ANOV Expansion) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 002/03 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a), of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 3 |
| 2015/C 002/04 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 002/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7486 — Ingram Micro/ANOV Expansion) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2015/C 002/03

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a), of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

3

2015/C 002/04

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Jamar WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2032

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1086 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of individuals 

from service on a Federal jury on account of disability. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. CASEY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. 

DUCKWORTH, Ms. WARREN, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. SMITH, and 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of individuals from service on a Federal jury on 

account of disability. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disability and Age in 

5 Jury Service Nondiscrimination Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1086 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT 

2 OF DISABILITY. 

3 (a) DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED.—Section 1862 of 

4 title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘dis5 ability, age,’’ after ‘‘origin,’’. 

6 (b) QUALIFICATIONS FOR JURY SERVICE.—Section 

7 1865 of title 28, United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting ‘‘that can9 not be reasonably accommodated’’ after ‘‘infirmity’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(c) No person may be disqualified from serving on 

13 grand and petit juries in the district court under para14 graph (2) or (3) of subsection (b) on account of disability 

15 if the person would be qualified under such paragraph (2) 

16 or (3) by reasonable accommodation.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,761
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,761)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (4,522)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,522)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 298/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 298 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 594 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 298

English edition

Legislation

Volume 594 November 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1902 of 27 October 2016 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for acetamiprid, ametoctradin, azoxystrobin, cyfluthrin, difluoroacetic acid, dimethomorph, fenpyrazamine, flonicamid, fluazinam, fludioxonil, flupyradifurone, flutriafol, fluxapyroxad, metconazole, proquinazid, prothioconazole, pyriproxyfen, spirodiclofen and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1902 of 27 October 2016 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for acetamiprid, ametoctradin, azoxystrobin, cyfluthrin, difluoroacetic acid, dimethomorph, fenpyrazamine, flonicamid, fluazinam, fludioxonil, flupyradifurone, flutriafol, fluxapyroxad, metconazole, proquinazid, prothioconazole, pyriproxyfen, spirodiclofen and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Gary EWERS, Gerri Mcgighan-Lukens, Oxylife Respiratory Services, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Appellants, v. Scott HERMAN and Craig Cooper directly and derivatively, on behalf of Oxylife Respiratory Services, LLC, an Ohio limited company, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2608

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ricardo Bernardes,

1. I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and we have:

(a) design such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary is, made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 25, 2007



By:

/s/ RICARDO BERNARDESRicardo BernardesExecutive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6174

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. RAMONA OBERA TUCKER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:05-cr-00416-HMH-1; 6:08-cv-70132-HMH)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ramona Obera Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ramona Obera Tucker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tucker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 262 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 262

       To repeal the excise tax on medical device manufacturers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2011

  Mr. Brown of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To repeal the excise tax on medical device manufacturers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX.

    Subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 1405 of the Health Care 
and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, and the amendments made 
thereby, are hereby repealed; and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
shall be applied as if such section and amendments had never been 
enacted.

SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF UNSPENT FEDERAL FUNDS TO OFFSET LOSS IN REVENUES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, of all 
available unobligated funds, $39,000,000,000 in appropriated 
discretionary funds are hereby rescinded.
    (b) Implementation.--The Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget shall determine and identify from which appropriation accounts 
the rescission under subsection (a) shall apply and the amount of such 
rescission that shall apply to each such account. Not later than 60 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget shall submit a report to the Secretary 
of the Treasury and Congress of the accounts and amounts determined and 
identified for rescission under the preceding sentence.
    (c) Exception.--This section shall not apply to the unobligated 
funds of the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans 
Affairs.   
                                 <all>
```
Tracy JEAN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA HOSPITAL MEDICAL GROUP, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2843

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                   |                                                            |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                   |
|                         |                              |                                                       |
| Date:              March 31, 2008 | By:                          | /s/ Mark              D.              Roberson   |
|                              | Mark              D. Roberson          |
|                              | Chief                Financial Officer |

----