2010 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 3-23-2010 

# Ron ald D and ar v

. M ark Krysevig P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 09-4381

F o llow thi s and a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi ll anova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e and ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i ll anova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2010 D e c i sion s b y an author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i ll anova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi ll anova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " Ron ald D and ar v

. M ark Krys evi g " (2010). 2010 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1664. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi ll anova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010/1664AL D- 1 5 4 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N os . 09- 4381 & 09- 4382

___________ R O N A L D G . D A N D A R , A ppel l ant

v. M A R K K R Y S E V IG ; B R A D L E Y H . F O U L K , THE D I STRI CT A TTOR NEY O F T H E C O U N T Y E R IE , P E N N A .; T H O M A S C O R B E T T , T H E A T T O R N E Y G E N E R A L O F T H E S T A T E O F P E N N S Y L V A N IA

___________ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e W e ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . C i vi l N o. 08- cv- 0060) D istric t Ju d g e : H o n o ra b le S e a n J. M c L a u g h lin

___________ Subm i t t ed forPoss i bl e Sum m aryA ct i on Pur s uantt o T h ir d C ir c u it L A R 2 7 .4 a n d I.O .P . 1 0 .6

M ar ch 18, 2010 B efor e: SL O V I T E R , A M B R O and SM I T H , C i r cui tJ udges

( O pi ni on fi l ed: M ar ch 23, 2010)

___________ OP I NI ON

___________ P E R C UR I AM R onal d G . D andarappea l s t he D i s t r i ctC our t ’ s O ct ober28, 2009, or der s deny i ng2

h i s mo t i o n s f

o ra p r e l i mi n a r yi n

j u n c t i o n . F o rt h e r e a s o n s b e l o w, we wi l l a f f i r m. I n February2008, D andarfi l ed a pe t i t i on pur s uantt o 28 U . S. C . § 2254. I n J une 2008, t he C om m onw eal t h fi l ed a r es pons e ar gui ng t hatt he D i s tr i ctC our tl acke d j ur i s di ct i on beca us e the pet i t i on w as s econd ors ucce s s i ve. W hi l e the § 2254 pet i t i on w as pendi ng, D andarfi l ed s ever al m ot i ons fori nj unct i ve r el i ef. O n M a y4 , 2 0 0 9 , D a n d a r f iled a m o tio n f

o r in ju n c tiv e re lief

(d o c k e t en try# 4 0 ) in w hi ch he r eques t ed more t i m e i n t he pr i s on l i br ary . H e then fi l ed anotherm ot i on ( docket entr y#41) r eques t i ng t he D i s t r i ctC our tt o or derpr i s on offi ci al s t o s t op di s cr i m i nat i ng agai ns thi m bas ed on hi s handi cap. T he M agi s t r at e J udge made an or al r ecomm endat i on to d en ythe m o ti o n s d u ri n g a c o n fe ren ce ca ll . T h e D istri ct C o u rtad o p ted th e O ral R ep o rt and R ecomm endat i on and deni ed the mot i ons ( docketentr y#91) . D andarfi l ed a not i ce of appe al w hi ch w as docket ed atC . A . N o. 09- 4381. O n M a y2 2 , 2 0 0 9 , D a n d a r f iled a m o tio n f

o r in ju n c tiv e re lief

(d o c k e t en try# 4 6 ) in w hi ch he c om pl ai ned thathi s Z code s i ngl e- cel l s t atus w as aboutt o be r es ci nded. I n a m ot i on dat ed J une 15, 2009, ( docketentr y#50) , D andarcompl ai ned thathi s Z code s t atus had bee n r es ci nded and thi s vi ol at ed hi s r i ght s t o due pr oces s . H e al s o cont ended thathe w as deni ed us e of ha ndi cappe d cel l s and s how er s . T he M agi s t r at e J udge made an or al rec o m m en d ati o n to d en ythe m o ti o n s d u ri n g a c o n fe ren ce ca ll . T h e D istri ct C o u rt a d o p te d th e O ra l R e p o rt a n d R e c o m m e n d a tio n a n d d e n ie d th e m o tio n s (d o c k e t e n tr y# 9 2 ). D andarfi l ed a not i ce of appea l w hi ch w as docket ed atC . A . N o. 09- 4382. H e al s o fi l ed a3

m oti on t o co nsoli date the tw o ap peals . D andar ’ s r eques t s fori nj unct i ve r el i ef c hal l enge c ondi t i ons of hi s confi nementand a re u n re late d to h is c h a llen g e to h is c rim in a l co n v ictio n . T h e se c laim s c a n b e p ro p e rly r ai s ed i n a compl ai ntunder42 U . S. C . § 1983 aft erhe has exhaus t ed hi s admi ni s t r at i ve re m e d ies . S e e L e a m e r v . F a u v e r, 2 8 8 F .3 d 5 3 2 , 5 4 4 (3 d C ir. 2 0 0 2 ) (“ [ U ]n les s th e c laim w oul d fal l w i t hi n t he ‘ cor e of ha beas ’ and r equi r e s oonerr el eas e i f r es ol ved i n t he pl ai nt i ff’ s favor , a pr i s on confi nementact i on s uch as t hi s i s pr oper l ybr oughtunder § 1983. ”) ; 42 U . S. C . § 1997e( a) . D andarcannotci r cumventt he fi l i ng fee r equi r ement s of 28 U . S. C . § 1915( b) ( 1) byfi l i ng t hes e r eques t s fori nj unct i ve r el i ef w i t hi n pr ocee di ngs under§ 2254. W e not e thatD andarhas had thr ee a ppeal s oract i ons di s m i s s ed as fr i vol ous , m al i ci ous , orforfai l ur e t o s t at e cl ai m . See D andarv. PA B oar d of Pr obat i on, C . A . N o. 02- 2114; D andarv. PA B oar d of Pr obat i on, W . D . Pa. C i v. N o. 00- cv- 00327; and D andarv. U . S. D i s t r i ctC our t , W . D . Pa. C i v. N o. 00- cv- 00186. T hus , he maynotbr i ng a ci vi l act i on bypr ocee di ng i n form a paupe r i s unl es s he i s i n i m m i nentdangerof s er i ous p h y sical i n

jury . S ee 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 9 1 5 (g). Sum m aryact i on i s appr opr i at e i f ther e i s no s ubs t ant i al ques t i on pr es ent ed i n t he ap p ea l. S ee T h ir d C ir cu itL A R 2 7 . 4 . F o r th e a b o v e re aso n s, w e w il l sum m aril yaf firm th e D istric t C o u rt’s o rd e r. S e e T h ird C irc u it I. O .P . 1 0 .6 . T o th e e x ten t D a n d a r re q u e sts that the a p p ea ls be co n so li d ated in h is m o ti o n d ated D ec em b er 1 8 , 2 0 0 9 , itis gran ted. In al l ot herr es pect s , t he mot i on i s deni ed.