alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For DaimlerChrysler NA Holding
Securities, Series 2004-10 (the "Trust"), certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in respect
            of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports filed in
            respect of the Trust during the 2006 calendar year;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
            provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the trust
            agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge,
            except as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has
            fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

      5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
            Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar
            standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
            accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
            Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
            procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement, that is included
            in these reports.

Date: March 30, 2007

By:    /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
     ------------------------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President
Hewitt GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5370

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                         692,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,272,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,786,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,058,000
<PP&E>                                      16,044,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,415,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,009,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,468,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,806,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,009,000
<SALES>                                     33,145,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,145,000
<CGS>                                       25,028,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,071,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             888,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,186,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,186,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,186,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2  EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I,  J Roland Vetter, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Brazil Gold Corp;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c)presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: October 9, 2012  By /s/ J Roland Vetter J Roland Vetter Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer
Maya THOMAS, f/k/a Maya Martinez, Appellant, v. HOTEL PROVIDERS, INC., and Ocean Properties, LTD., d/b/a Hilton Key West Resort and Marina, Appellees.

No. 3D16-2233

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE>                        5
 <MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

 <S>                              <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-2000
 <PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-26-1999
 <CASH>                                               49,469
 <SECURITIES>                                         98,386
 <RECEIVABLES>                                        58,108
 <ALLOWANCES>                                          5,066
 <INVENTORY>                                          16,494
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    232,733
 <PP&E>                                              139,866
 <DEPRECIATION>                                       91,297
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      305,565
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                55,338
 <BONDS>                                                   0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
 <PREFERRED>                                               0
 <COMMON>                                                214
 <OTHER-SE>                                          225,307
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        305,565
 <SALES>                                              69,074
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    127,343
 <CGS>                                                28,347
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                        66,970
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     69,282
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      967
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                         750
 <INCOME-TAX>                                            188
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     562
 <DISCONTINUED>                                            0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
 <CHANGES>                                                 0
 <NET-INCOME>                                            562
 <EPS-BASIC>                                           .03
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                           .03



</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2461** 

BROTHERS OF THE WHEEL M.C. EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, INC., a West Virginia Corporation , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
GERALD R. MOLLOHAN , Defendant

– Appellant,
and
JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 50 , Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charleston

. Thomas E. Johnston , District Judge. ( 2:11

- cv - 00104 )

Submitted : April 3, 2013 Decided: April 18, 2013

Before SHEDD and DAVIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Gerald R. Mollohan , Appellant Pro Se. Richard J. Lindroth , South Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee

.2 Unpublished opinio ns are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Gerald R. Mollohan seeks to appeal the district court’s order ruling that he is liable to Appellee for damages and ordering the parties to submit certain information, but ordering that no damages would be awarded until the information is received and evaluated by the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order
Mollohan s eeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Liberty Mut.
Ins. Co. v. Wetzel , 424 U.S. 737, 742 (1 976); Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Dynegy Mktg. & Trade , 415 F.3d 354, 358 (4th Cir.
2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Appellee’s motions to strike. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

co ntentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.1
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 Amendment VIRCO MFG.
CORPORATION Borrower WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION Bank Credit
Agreement
   Section 1. Amendment to Section 5.8 of the Credit Agreement.
 Dividends, Distributions
 Restricted
Payment provided, however
 Section 2. Amendment to Section 5.12 of the Credit Agreement .
 Minimum Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio




---



##### 



Section 3. Amendment to Section 5.13 of the Credit Agreement.
 Maximum ConsolidatedApplicable Fiscal Quarter
    
    Leverage RatioFiscal quarter ended 
January 31, 2010
    
    1.75 to 1.00Fiscal quarter ended 
April 30, 2010
    
    6.00 to 1.00Fiscal quarter ended 
July 31, 2010
    
    6.00 to 1.00Fiscal quarter ended 
October 31, 2010
    
    1.25 to 1.00Fiscal quarter ended 
January 31, 2011
    
    1.75 to 1.00Fiscal quarter ended 
April 30, 2011
    
    5.00 to 1.00Fiscal quarter ended 
July 31, 2011
    
    6.00 to 1.00Fiscal quarter ended 
October 31, 2011
    
    1.25 to 1.00Fiscal quarter ended 
January 31, 2012
    
    1.75 to 1.00
 Section 4. Consent to Amendments .




---



##### 



Section 5. Representations and Warranties.
 Representations and Warranties in Credit Agreement
 Authority
 Enforceability of Obligations
 No Event of Default
 Section 6. Conditions to Effectiveness.




---



##### 



Section 7. Admissions and Acknowledgments.
    Section 8. Reference to and Effect on Loan Documents.




---



##### 



Section 9. Benefits of Amendment .
 Section 10. Interpretation .
 Section 11. Execution in Counterparts .
 Section 12. Severability .
 Section 13. Governing Law .
 Section 14. Expenses .
 Section 15. No Course of Dealing.
 Section 16. Arms Length Agreement.




---



##### 



Section 17. Entire Agreement.




---



##### 



VIRCO MFG. CORPORATION,
        as the BorrowerBy:Name:
    Robert E. DoseTitle:
    Vice President - Finance, Secretary and TreasurerVIRCO, INC.,
        as a GuarantorBy:Name:
    Robert E. DoseTitle:
    Vice President - Finance, Secretary and Treasurer




---



##### 



WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:Name:
    Mehdi EmraniTitle:
    Vice President
Almuta Mohammad Shabazz HAWKS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Jessica Erin BODNER v. Corey Michael BROUSSARD

2150980

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
A.J. Muldoon 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Bill Goertzen 

P.O. Box 211049 

Auke Bay, AK 99821 

August 10, 2012 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Room W86-489 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket DOT-OST-1997-3134 

Dear Mr. Muldoon, 

I support Ward Air's proposal to continue to provide air service to Chatham, Alaska for 

the two year period beginning October 1, 1012. 

I own property in Chatham, Alaska and am a part-time resident there. I have flown with 

Ward Air for many years to and from Chatham. I have found their service very reliable 

and safe. They have also been very accommodating in adjusting their schedule to meet 

the needs of the residents and visitors to Chatham. This is very important since there is 

only once a month essential air service to Chatham. 

In addition, Ward Air's ability and willingness to utilize a Beaver when weather or the 

customers' needs warrant use of an aircraft larger than a Cessna 206 is important to the 

service needs of the community. 

Accordingly, I recommend that you once again select Ward Air as the Essential Air 

Service provider for Chatham, Alaska. 

Thank you for your consideration of my comments. 

~-;;il/1~1- Bill Goertzen tcwQ ~ ~~ 321-2?2~ 

}?;/( '7 c:J Cj c 1 Jlf!_ -t
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2486 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethylene-Propylene polymer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethylene-Propylene 

polymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHYLENE-PROPYLENE POLYMER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ethylene-Propylene polymer 

(CAS No. 9010–79–1) (provided for in subheading 

3902.30.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2486 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Jaques Delorente RANDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,019]


Delphi Corporation Corporate Headquarters and Product & Service 
Solutions Division Including On-Site Leased Workers From Aerotek, 
Bartech and Securitas Security, Troy, MI; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 30, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Delphi Corporation, Corporate Headquarters and Product & Service 
Solutions Division, Troy, Michigan. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on February 23, 2009 (74 FR 8115).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers perform 
administrative and support functions for prototype automotive parts.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm adversely affected by the shift in 
production of prototype automotive parts the Mexico.
    New information shows that workers leased from Aerotek, Bartech and 
Securitas Security were employed on-site at the Troy, Michigan location 
of Delphi Corporation, Corporate Headquarters and Product & Service 
Solutions Division. The Department has determined that these workers 
were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be 
considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Aerotek, Bartech and 
Securitas Security working on-site at the Troy, Michigan location of 
the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-65,019 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Delphi Corporation, Corporate Headquarters and 
Product & Service Solutions Division, including on-site leased 
workers from Aerotek, Bartech and Securitas Security, Troy, 
Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after January 27, 2008, through January 30, 2011, are eligible 
to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade 
Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of April 2009.
 Linda G. Poole,
 Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-8407 Filed 4-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements included in the Form 10-Q of American Safety Razor Company
for the quarter ended  September  29, 2000,  and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000750339
<NAME>                          American Safety Razor Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         4,121
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  48,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    62,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,616
<PP&E>                                         109,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                 18,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 402,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          47,781
<BONDS>                                        180,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       121
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   402,372
<SALES>                                        240,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,564
<CGS>                                          159,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,291
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,480
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,480
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.29




</TABLE>