alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------









                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.






Date:  October 21, 2003                              /s/ Larry F Vance
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Larry F Vance
                                                     Chairman of the Board and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Jae HAHLBOHM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-914

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE EX REL. Marlon R. CARTER v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-2041

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF K. A. C., K. C. 

M. C., AND E. C., CHILDREN,

 

 Appellant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00218-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2017DCM2545)

O R D E R

In order to protect the identity of the minor child who is the subject of this appeal, the Court 

has determined on its own motion that it is necessary to identify the children by their initials, K. 

A. C., K. C., M. C., and E. C., and the parent by initials as well, in all papers submitted to the 

Court, including letters, motions, and briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 9..8. The Court will also refer to 

the children and parent by their initials in correspondence, orders, and in its opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7

th day of December, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
**Exhibit 10(a)**

** **

** **

**THENEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY**

**MANAGEMENTUNIT OWNERSHIP PROGRAM**

** **

**AMENDMENTNO.  4**

** **

WHEREAS, TheNewhall Land and Farming Company (the “Company”) established The Newhall Landand Farming Company Management Unit Ownership Program (the “Plan”) for thebenefit of certain of its employees, effective March 1994;

 

WHEREAS, Section20 of the Plan provides that the Compensation Committee of the Board ofDirectors (the “Compensation Committee”) may amend or terminate the Plan fromtime to time;

 

WHEREAS, theCompensation Committee has authorized and approved the amendment of the Plan asset forth herein;

 

NOW, THEREFORE,effective July 25, 2003, the Plan is amended as follows:

 

1.                                       Adda new Section 21 as follows:

 

“21.  Suspensionof Program.  Notwithstandinganything contained herein to the contrary at any time that the Partnership hasentered into an agreement to effect a Structural Transaction, the grant of UnitRights under Section 5 shall be suspended (a “Structural TransactionSuspension”) so that no additional Unit Rights will be granted under thisProgram; provided, however, if the Compensation Committee of the Board ofDirectors formally determines that the Structural Transaction has beenabandoned, (a) the Structural Transaction Suspension with respect to suchStructural Transaction shall automatically prospectively lapse as of that date;and (b) the Partnership shall grant each Grantee the number of Unit Rights thathe or she would have been granted in the absence of the Structural TransactionSuspension and, for each such grant, shorten the vesting schedule set forth inSection 6 by the number of days earlier that the grant would have occurred inthe absence of the Structural Transaction Suspension.”

 

----

 

This Amendment No.4 of The Newhall Land and Farming Company Management Unit Ownership Program hasbeen approved and adopted as of July 25, 2003.

 
|   | The Newhall Land and  Farming Company |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | (A California Limited  Partnership)   |
|   |                                  |
|   | By:                                   | Newhall Management  Limited Partnership, |
|   |                                  | its Managing General  Partner |
|   |                                  |   |
|   | By:                                   | Newhall Management  Corporation, |
|   |                                  | its Managing General  Partner |
|   |                                  |   |
|   |                                  |   |
|   |                                  | By: | / S / DONALD L. KIMBALL |   |
|   |                                  |   | Donald L. Kimball |
|   |                                  |   | Vice President and |
|   |                                  |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

2

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2495 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain clearcoat lacquer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain clearcoat lacquer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CLEARCOAT LACQUER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Clearcoat lacquer, based on 

vinyl or acrylic polymers 

(provided for in subheading 

3208.20.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2495 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00404

- CV

J OSEPH Y AMMINE

, Appellant

V

.

E MAD T AQ

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 2022

- 005127

- 1 )

October 19, 2023

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal s hould be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### George S. SMITH, Appellant, v. Wendy WINTERSTEEN; Forrest William Ravlin; Dennis D. Kopp; United States of America, Appellees.

No. 03-2550.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2004.

Decided May 21, 2004.

George S. Smith, Columbia, MO, pro se.

Gordon Eugene Allen, Attorney General’s Office, Des Moines, IA, Kerry Anderson, Department of Transportation, Ames, IA, Sherry L. Doctorian, Armstrong & Teasdale, Jefferson City, MO, Joel F. May, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Appellees.

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

George S. Smith sued defendants for writing an allegedly defamatory letter to his employer with intent to injure his personal and professional reputation, in violation of Missouri law. He appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his diversity action for failure to state a claim and lack of personal jurisdiction.

We conclude that the district court properly substituted the United States as a party for defendant Kopp, a United States Department of Agriculture employee, and properly denied Smith’s motion to remand. See 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1), (2) (upon certification by Attorney General that defendant employee was acting within scope of employment, action shall be deemed to be action against United States and case shall be removed to district court). The district court then properly dismissed the claims against the United States. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2680(h) (intentional-torts exception to waiver of sovereign immunity in Federal Tort Claims Act).

We also affirm the district court’s dismissal of defendant Wintersteen, an employee of Iowa State University, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), because she is entitled to official immunity under Missouri law. *See Kanagawa v. State ex rel. Freeman,*685 S.W.2d 831, 835 (Mo.1985) (public officials are shielded from personal liability for discretionary acts when acting within scope of authority), *overruled on other grounds by Alexander v. State,*756 S.W.2d 539, 541-42 (Mo.1988).

Finally, we affirm the dismissal of defendant Ravlin, an employee of the Ohio State *70University, although not on the grounds articulated by the district court. *See Campbell v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue,*943 F.2d 815, 818 (8th Cir.1991) (appellate court may affirm trial court’s decision on any ground supported by record, whether or not that ground was addressed below). We find that under either Ohio or Missouri law, Ravlin is immune from suit. *See*Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 9.86 (Anderson 2001) (no employee shall be liable in any civil action for damage or injury caused in performance of his duties, unless employee’s actions were outside scope of employment or employee acted with malicious purpose, in bad faith, or in wanton or reckless manner); *Kanagawa,*685 S.W.2d at 835.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                           |                                                        
|-------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:
 September 28, 2010 | /s/ B. Steven
 Springrose                              
|                           | B. Steven
 Springrose                                  
|                           | Chief
 Executive Officer (principal executive
 officer)
|                           |                                                        
|Dated:
 September 28, 2010 | /s/ Judy E.
 Naus                                      
|                           | Judy E. Naus                                           
|                           | Chief
 Financial Officer                               
|                           | (principal financial officer)                          

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

        NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hubert A. J. Whyte, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Hubert A. J. Whyte
-----------------------
Hubert A. J. Whyte
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002



                                    Page 23
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 26, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01433-CV 

LAKESHA PETERSON, Appellant 

V. 

CAMERON ALEXANDER HANCOCK, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-20377 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The filing fee in this case is past due. By postcard dated October 16, 2013, we notified appellant 

the $175 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly 

cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated 

October 16, 2013, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We 

directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so might result in dismissal of her appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the 

docketing statement, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b)(c).

 

131433F.P05 

 

Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
131433.dis.fee.op.docx –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

LAKESHA PETERSON, Appellant 

No. 05-13-01433-CV V. 

CAMERON ALEXANDER HANCOCK, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-20377. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Brown 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee CAMERON ALEXANDER HANCOCK recover his costs 

of this appeal from appellant LAKESHA PETERSON. 

Judgment entered March 26, 2014 

/ Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE
Daniel C. OZELLA, Appellant, v. Katherine L. MEIER, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-77

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Itamar BARHAI, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee FOR MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, MANA Series 2007-OAR5, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3175

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.0



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Carolyn M. MrozCarolyn M. MrozPresident and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 28, 2005By:

/s/ Edmund T. LeonardEdmund T. LeonardChairman of the Board and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 28, 2005
James R. GOODMAN, Appellant, v. PALADIN FUND II, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2084

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document

Exhibit 10.8



Chubb Limited
Outside Directors Compensation Parameters






						
		
	•	Annual Retainer Fee of $325,000. Paid $190,000 in restricted stock and $135,000 cash or, at the election of the director, $325,000 in restricted stock. Includes expectation of service on up to two committees (not counting service on Executive Committee). No fees are payable for regular board or committee meetings.





						
		
	•	Annual premiums for committee chairs and Lead Director:




—     Audit–$35,000        
—     Compensation–$25,000    
—     Nominating & Governance–$20,000        
—     Risk & Finance–$25,000
—     Lead Director–$50,000


						
		
	•	Annual premiums for selected committee service (non-chair): None.




						
		
	•	Committee chair and Lead Director service premiums are payable in cash quarterly or, at the election of the director, in restricted stock annually.




						
		
	•	Meeting fees for “special” meetings (required to consider transactions or other special circumstances, as determined jointly by the Lead Director and Chairman): $2,000 per telephone meeting, $3,000 for ‘in person’ meetings. Payable in cash quarterly. Meeting fees as described in this paragraph shall be payable as determined by the Nominating & Governance Committee, but in all cases subject to availability, taking into account paid and allocable Retainer Fees and premiums described above, within the annual compensation cap approved by shareholders.





						
		
	•	Restricted stock will be awarded at beginning of the plan year (i.e. the date of the Annual General Meeting) and become non-forfeitable at end of the plan year, provided that the grantee has remained a Chubb director continuously during that plan year. Increases shall be paid on a pro-rated basis, based on date of award.









Last Amended: February 2022
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Fund. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD      ENERGY M FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | March      16, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   | ROBERT E.      SWANSON                                    |
|   |                |   | Name:  |   | Robert      E. Swanson                                    |
|   |                |   | Title: |   | Chief      Executive Officer                              |
|   |                |   |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |
| Dated: | March      16, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   | KATHLEEN P.      MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |                |   | Name:  |   | Kathleen      P. McSherry                                 |
|   |                |   | Title: |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                |   |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |                |   |   |   |                                                      |

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHASITY C. MUICH

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2751

LT Case No. 2022

- DR

- 510

MARY LYNETTE LEE

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Decision filed May 30, 2023

Appeal from the Circui t Court

for Sumter County

, Michelle Morley , Judge.

Chas ity C. Muich, Etna, Ohio, pro

se

, Appellant.

Mary Lynette Lee, Oxford, pro se

, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BOATWRIGHT

, KILBANE and PRATT , JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2522 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2522

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on onitrophenol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on onitrophenol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ONITROPHENOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.29 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to onitrophenol) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```