alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 96 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the consideration of certain legislation that authorizes or makes appropriations unless 

such legislation includes a table that details the amount of appropriations 

authorized or appropriated for each program and an estimate of the 

costs (if any) of servicing the public debt which would be incurred 

in carrying out the measure, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2023 

Mr. MOONEY (for himself, Mr. PERRY, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. NORMAN, and Mr. 

BUCK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit the consideration of certain legislation that authorizes or makes appropriations unless such legislation 

includes a table that details the amount of appropriations 

authorized or appropriated for each program and an 

estimate of the costs (if any) of servicing the public 

debt which would be incurred in carrying out the measure, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 96 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency 

3 in Federal Spending Resolution’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN LEGIS5 LATION WITH RESPECT TO APPROPRIATIONS. 

6 Rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representa7 tives is amended by adding at the end the following new 

8 clause: 

9 ‘‘13.(a) It shall not be in order to consider a bill, reso10 lution, or conference report, or an amendment thereto, 

11 that authorizes the appropriation of funds or makes ap12 propriations for one or more programs unless the measure 

13 includes a table in machine readable format at the end 

14 of the measure that details— 

15 ‘‘(1) the amount of funds authorized or appro16 priated for each such program; 

17 ‘‘(2) the amount of funds authorized or appro18 priated with respect to each fiscal year for each such 

19 program; and 

20 ‘‘(3) an estimate of the costs (if any) of serv21 icing the public debt which would be incurred in car22 rying out each such program. 

23 ‘‘(b) It shall not be in order to consider a rule or 

24 order that waives the application of this clause. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 96 IH 

1 ‘‘(c) For the purposes of this clause, the term ‘pro2 gram’ has the meaning given such term in section 1122(a) 

3 of title 31, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Joshua Brian PITTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1095

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION     (Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, Larry C. Oldham, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofParallel Petroleum Corporation (“Parallel”), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Parallel for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the periodic reportingrequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained inthat Form 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Parallel.Dated: May 10, 2006         /s/ Larry C. Oldham   Larry C. Oldham,   President and Chief Executive Officer        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel Petroleum Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2495 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2495

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain clearcoat lacquer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain clearcoat lacquer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CLEARCOAT LACQUER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Clearcoat lacquer,  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        based on vinyl or                                                  31/2015.......
                        acrylic polymers
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3208.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Donald ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3329

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 20, 2018

Donald Anderson, Jasper, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Donald Anderson appeals the summary denial of his motions for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although the brief filed by Anderson states four issues, he declined to address two of them. As to these two issues, we affirm without further discussion. We also affirm without discussion the summary denial of Anderson's claim of newly discovered evidence regarding alleged errors made by a State expert in fingerprint analysis.

Regarding the fourth issue, Anderson argues that the alleged failure of his counsel to investigate and call a material witness warrants relief. We reverse the summary denial of this claim and remand for the trial court to attach to its order portions of the record conclusively refuting this claim or for an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
FLORIDA PROPERTY RECEIVER FORCE, LLC O/B/O RIVERHOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1607

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00774-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF William H. MCNUTT

From the County Court, Kimble County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2284

Honorable Joe Loving Jr., Judge Presiding1

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed against Appellant Sherry 

McNutt.

SIGNED December 27, 2019.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

 1 The Honorable Delbert R. Roberts is the presiding judge of the Kimble County Court.
Exhibit
32.2
  Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 Solely  for  the  purposes
of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned  Acting  Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form  10-QSB
of  the  Company  for  the  quarter
ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report")  fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act  of  1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial
condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.
 
 
 Date:
      April 21, 2008
              
              /s/Tami
      J. StoryTami
      J. StoryActing
      Chief Financial Officer
James A. THOMAS and Sharon Thomas v. Bryan BOYD and Werner Enterprises, Inc. of Nebraska

NO. 2018-C-0232

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

Denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Omar MEDRANO-GALLEGOS, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-10183.

D.C. No. CR-02-05221-AWI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 2004.*

Decided May 13, 2004.

David L. Gappa, USF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ann H. Voris, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office (Fresno), Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*144Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Medrano-Gallegos appeals his conviction and sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for being a deported alien found in the United States. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because, as MedranoGallegos concedes, he had no plausible grounds for relief from removal at the time he was originally removed from the United States, he cannot demonstrate actual prejudice from any procedural flaws in the underlying removal and we therefore affirm his conviction. *See United States v. Garcia-Martinez,*228 F.3d 956, 963-64 (9th Cir.2000).

The government has conceded that because of a mistake in the Presentencing Report the district court plainly erred by adjusting Medrano-Gallegos’ base offense level upward 16 levels, as opposed to the 12-level adjustment that the government believes would have been appropriate. We therefore remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of resentencing. *United States v. Davis,*36 F.3d 1424, 1435 (9th Cir.1994).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Emerson PEROZO, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D18-373

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, C.J.

The petitioner, Emerson Perozo, seeks mandamus relief instructing the trial court to accept his written waiver of appearance at any pretrial conference. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.180(a)(3) ("In all prosecutions for crime the defendant shall be present ... at any pretrial conference, unless waived by the defendant in writing[.]"); 3.220(*o* )(1) ("The trial court may hold 1 or more pretrial conferences, with trial counsel present, to consider such matters as will promote a fair and expeditious trial. The defendant shall be present unless the defendant waives this in writing."). Because no good cause has been shown to override the defendant's waiver, we grant the petition for writ of mandamus and instruct the trial court to accept the petitioner's written waiver of appearance. *See**794*Charlemagne v. Guevara*, 183 So.3d 1261, 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) ("[I]f there is a good reason to do so, a trial court may require the presence of the defendant in court even when the defendant has filed a written waiver [of appearance at pretrial conferences].") (citing *Cruz v. State*, 822 So.2d 595 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ).

Petition granted; writ of mandamus issued.
STATE of Louisiana v. Paul Jacob NORMAN, II

NO. 2017-KO-1152

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER





I, Larry F. Vance, certify
that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report
on Form 10-QSB of Earth Search Sciences, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





4. The registrant's other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and





c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant's other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):





a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.








Date: April 21,
      2008
            /s/ Larry F. VanceLarry F.
    VanceChief Executive
      Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: June 6, 2008
    
    
    
    /s/ Robert E. Dose

Robert E. Dose 
Vice President of Finance of Virco Mfg. Corporation
(Principal Financial Officer)
 17
Elizabeth COWART-PRIDE, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1769

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Grant Dillon CAMPBELL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Kevin Leon NEAL, Appellant, v. Claude MAYE, Warden of South Bay Correctional Facility, Appellee.

No. 4D18-298

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Viosolar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the period ending July 31, 2008, and as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick
Walchuk, Director, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      February 12, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Rick
      WalchukName: Rick
      WalchukTitle: Chief
      Executive Officer, President and Director
EX-10.2






Revolving Note




$35,750,000 October 6, 2011



For Value Received, the undersigned (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the
order of KeyBank National Association (the “Lender”), on the Maturity Date (as defined in
the Credit Agreement referred to below) the principal amount of Thirty-Five Million Seven
Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($35,750,000), or such lesser principal amount of Loans (as
defined in the Credit Agreement referred to below) payable by Borrower to Lender on such Revolving
Credit Termination Date under that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011, among
Borrower, Lenders from time to time party thereto, KeyBank National Association, as Agent
and a Lender (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from
time to time, the “Agreement;” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined).



Borrower promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Revolving Credit Loan
from the date of such Revolving Credit Loan until such principal amount is paid in full, at such
interest rates, and payable at such times as are specified in the Agreement.



All payments of principal and interest shall be made to Agent for the account of Lender in
United States dollars in immediately available funds at Agent’s Principal Office.



If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest,
to be paid upon demand, from the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as
well as after judgment) computed at the Post-Default Rate set forth in the Agreement.



This Revolving Note is one of the “Revolving Credit Notes” referred to in the Agreement.
Reference is hereby made to the Agreement for rights and obligations of payment and prepayment,
events of default and the right of Lender to accelerate the maturity hereof upon the occurrence of
such events. Revolving Credit Loans made by Lender shall be evidenced by one or more loan accounts
or records maintained by Lender in the ordinary course of business. Lender may also attach
schedules to this Revolving Credit Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its
Revolving Credit Loans and payments with respect thereto.



Borrower, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment,
protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and non-payment of this Revolving Credit
Note.



Borrower agrees to pay all collection expenses, court costs and attorney costs (whether or not
litigation is commenced) which may be incurred by Lender in connection with the collection or
enforcement of this Revolving Credit Note, all as further set forth in the Agreement.



THIS REVOLVING NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Revolving Credit Note to be duly executed on
the date first above written.



GRUBB& ELLIS HEALTHCARE REITT II


HOLDINGS, LP



By: Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc.


Its: General Partner



By: /s/ Shannon K S Johnson


Its: Authorized Representative
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CT HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAY
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          39,533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,164,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,100,000
<INVENTORY>                                     78,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,031,212
<PP&E>                                         967,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                 796,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,197,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,532,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                       513,253
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,152,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,197,495
<SALES>                                        176,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,849
<CGS>                                            3,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,147,520)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,147,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,147,520)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>