alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE EX REL. Samuel RICHARDSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2036

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated an application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I,
Larry F. Vance, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Earth Search Sciences,
Inc.;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
      February 19, 2008
            /s/
      Larry F. VanceLarry F. VanceChief
      Executive Officer
James A. THOMAS and Sharon Thomas v. Bryan BOYD and Werner Enterprises, Inc. of Nebraska

NO. 2018-00233

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16885-16886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8322]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission; 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, May 21, 2009.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist Federal, State and local 
authorities in

[[Page 16886]]

the development and implementation of an integrated resource management 
plan for those lands and waters within the Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on May 21, 2009 at 9 a.m. at the 
Blackstone Valley Regional Vocational Technical High School, located at 
65 Pleasant Street, Upton, MA for the following reasons:
    1. Approval of Minutes.
    2. Chairman's Report.
    3. Executive Director's Report.
    4. Financial Budget.
    5. Public Input.
    It is anticipated that about thirty people will be able to attend 
the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John H. 
Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, 
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Jan H. Reitsma,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. E9-8322 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00452
- CV

Roya Gessel, Appellant

v. Jesse Gessel, Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 18
- 001790 , THE HONORABLE JAME S L. ARTH, JUDGE PRE SIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Roya Gessel seeks to appeal a final decree of divorce signed by the district court

on November 20 , 2018. The thirty

- day deadline for filing her notice of appeal to this Court was December 2 0 , 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) ( 1). However, she did not file her notice of appeal to this Court until J uly 9 , 2019, and she did not seek an extension of time to file it. See id

. R. 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See id

. R. 25.1 ( b ) ; Gardner v. Gardner , No. 01

- 17

- 00525

- CV, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 7606, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 10, 2017 , no pet. ) (mem. op.) (dismissing untimely appeal of divorce decree).2 On August 12, 2019, this Court requested that appellant Gessel f ile a written response demonstrating our jurisdiction over h er appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). She did
not file any response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id

.

__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith Dismissed for Want of Jurisd iction Filed: August 27, 2019
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

I, Vladimir F. Iorich, certify that:

 

1.          Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mechel OAO;

 

2.          Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.          Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.          Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

(a)        Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)        Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)        Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.          Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)        Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)        Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  May 22, 2006 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |   |
|                          | /s/ Vladimir F. Iorich |   |
|                          | Vladimir F. Iorich |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 68 (Friday, April 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16366-16367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Sensors and Instrumentation; Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 
of Partially Closed Meeting

    The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee 
(SITAC) will meet on April 28, 2009, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Constitution and 
Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable 
to sensors and instrumentation equipment and technology.

Agenda

Public Session

    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Remarks from the Bureau of Industry and Security Management.
    3. Industry Presentations.
    4. New Business.

Closed Session

    5. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 section 
10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c099b3b0b2a9aea7a5b280a2a9b3eea4afa3eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="59002a292b30373e3c2b193b302a773d363a773e362f">[email protected]</span></a> no later than April 21, 2009.
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to 
the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time 
before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of 
public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee 
suggests that the materials be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. 
Springer.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on December 4, 2008 pursuant 
to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. app. 2 section 10(d)), that the portion of this meeting dealing 
with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and U.S. 
export control policies shall be exempt from the provisions relating to 
public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 section 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). 
The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public.
    For more information contact Yvette Springer on (202) 482-2813.


[[Page 16367]]


    Dated: April 6, 2009.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-8243 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Scottie Lee WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 50238 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. R O B E R T O C A R L O S V ILL A R R E A L al so kn ow n as, E bri o D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U S D C N o . 3 :07 -C R -1 6 2 4 -1
B ef ore S M ITH , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney app oi n t ed to represent R obert o C arl os V i l l arrealha s m oved f o rl e av e t o w i t h draw a n d has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S
. 738 ( 19 67 )
. Vi l l ar r e alha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 16, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
COMSTOCK ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability corporation, Petitioner, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-2955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
STATE EX REL. Shedrick GIVENS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0238

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Ted J. BRUNTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5217

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: May 14, 2010 | /s/ KENDRA BERGER                                                    |
|                | Kendra Berger                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                | NTN Buzztime, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |

----
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly filing of Golden Chief Resources, Inc., a
Kansas corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June
30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, B. Fred Oden, III, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


October 13, 2006

By:/s/ B. Fred Oden, III
-------------------------
B. Fred Oden, III
President
Exhibit
14.1











Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





American
Goldrush Corporation


Vancouver,
Canada





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-126103) of our report dated June 30, 2009 relating to the financial
statements of American Goldrush Corporation (“the Company”) which appear in this
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our report contains an
explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.








/s/ BDO
Dunwoody LLP





Chartered
Accountants





Vancouver,
Canada


June 30,
2009
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 3253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01163]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15230 and #15231; Arizona Disaster Number AZ-
00050]


Administrative Declaration Amendment of Disaster for the State of 
Arizona

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Arizona dated 08/03/2017.
    Incident: Post-fire Flooding from Monsoon Storms.
    Incident Period: 07/19/2017 through 09/30/2017.

DATES: Issued on 01/11/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/02/2017.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/03/2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an Administrative declaration 
for the State of ARIZONA, dated 08/03/2017, is hereby amended to 
establish the incident closing date as 09/30/2017.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

    Dated: January 11, 2018.
Linda E. McMahon,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-01163 Filed 1-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P