alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-03-0327-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

	______________________________

	STEVEN EUGENE PRESLEY, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 11,618-B; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	Appellant pled guilty to the offense of Aggravated Sexual Assault and was sentenced to 32 years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division.  Sentence was imposed on October 20, 1997.  On July 18, 2003, a pro se notice of appeal was filed with the trial court.  

	A defendant must file a sufficient written notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed if there has not been a timely motion for new trial filed with the court.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2 & 26.2(a)(1), (2).  The appellate court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal with the trial court and files in the appellate court a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 & 10.5(b)(2).  If the appeal is not timely perfected, the court does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998).  

	As noted, appellant’s sentence was imposed on October 20, 1997.  No motion for new trial or motion for extension of time was filed, making appellant’s notice of appeal due on November 19, 1997.  Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed approximately 68 months later.  Appellant’s failure to file his notice of appeal timely prevents this court from having jurisdiction over his appeal.  

	Appellant’s appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.1

							James T. Campbell

						                 Justice

Do not publish.
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **NATIONAL    INTERSTATE CORPORATION** **SARBANES-OXLEY    SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Julie A. McGraw, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of National Interstate Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      By: /s/  Julie    A. McGraw    Julie A. McGraw    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)     March 14, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of the South Carolina Advisory to the Commission will convene at 1 p.m. and adjourn at 3 p.m. on May 7, 2009, at 300 Senate Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. The purpose of the meeting is for the Committee to discuss its report on parental notification of supplemental educational services under the No Child Left Behind Act.

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The address is 61 Forsyth St., SW., Suite 18T40, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Persons wishing to email comments may do so to                     *pminarik@usccr.gov*. Persons who desire additional information should contact Peter Minarik, Regional Director, at (404) 562-7000 or 800-877-8339 for individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech disabilities or by e-mail to                     *pminarik@usccr.gov*.                

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's website,                     *http://www.usccr.gov*, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, April 8, 2009.

Christopher Byrnes, 

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

 [FR Doc. E9-8440 Filed 4-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
EPA - HQ - OW - 2014 - 0598 - DRAFT - 0809 SGE00739.A0 1 Insert page File sent on CD
# Official Journal C 404/4 De

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 404 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 584 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 404

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 584 December 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 404/1 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 34th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 404/1

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 34th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document

Exhibit 10.16

																					
	
							
	SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVES WITH MANAGEMENT CONTINUITY AGREEMENTS		
							
	Title		Name		Years / Comp*		Excise Tax Gross Up?
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer	 	Robert M. Patterson	 	3	 	Y
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	 	Jamie A. Beggs	 	2	 	N
	Senior Vice President, President of Distribution	 	Cathy K. Dodd	 	2	 	N
	Senior Vice President, President, Color, Additives and Inks, EMEA		Michael A. Garratt		2		N
	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	 	Lisa K. Kunkle	 	3	 	Y
	Senior Vice President, Global Operations and Process Improvement	 	M. John Midea, Jr.	 	2	 	N
	Senior Vice President, President of Color, Additives and Inks, Americas and Asia	 	Woon Keat Moh	 	2	 	N
	Senior Vice President, President of Specialty Engineered Materials	 	Christopher L. Pederson	 	2	 	N
	Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer		Vinod Purayath		2		N
	Senior Vice President, Mergers & Acquisitions	 	Joel R. Rathbun	 	2	 	N
	Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer	 	João José San Martin Neto	 	2	 	N


* Years of compensation payable upon change of control
STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph CROSBY, Jr.

NO. 2018-KH-0362

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2493 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2493

   To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, 
                       polymer with formaldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, 
                       polymer with formaldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2,4,6-TRIAMINE, POLYMER WITH FORMALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      1,3,5-Triazine-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        2,4,6-triamine,                                                    31/2015.......
                        polymer with
                        formaldehyde (CAS
                        No. 9003-08-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3909.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,852-03

EX PARTE JAMES THOMAS EBMEYER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 40801-C*3 IN THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WICHITA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and

sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte

Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. 

As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is
2

the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to

Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07,

§ 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal. 

The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems

relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 26, 2017

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         136,375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,220
<PP&E>                                          37,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 965,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,384,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,116,857
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,560,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (418,943)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,714
<CGS>                                           26,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               633,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (594,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (594,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (594,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-8-2012

In re: Brenneis A. Nesbitt

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 12-1159

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In re: Brenneis A. Nesbitt " (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 1439.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/1439
DLD-106 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-1159

___________

IN RE: BRENNEIS A. NESBITT,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

District Court of the Virgin Islands

(Related to D.V.I. Crim. No. 04-cr-00077/D.V.I. Civ. No. 09-cv-00126)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

February 2, 2012

Before: AMBRO, JORDAN AND VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed February 8, 2012)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

On January 24, 2012, Brenneis Alister Nesbitt filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on a motion that he had 

filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On that same day, the District Court ruled on 

Nesbitt’s § 2255 motion. In light of the District Court’s action, the question Nesbitt 

presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will deny the petition as moot. See, e.g., 

Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992).
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2541 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2541

       To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphorescent pigment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphorescent pigment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHORESCENT PIGMENT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Phosphorescent      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        pigment (CAS No.                                                   31/2015.......
                        68611-70-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3206.42.0000)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         265,183
<SECURITIES>                                 8,305,866
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    322,294
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,209,890
<PP&E>                                         166,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,508,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,112,117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,963
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,257,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,508,869
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               748,956
<CGS>                                          205,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,818,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (134,260)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (935,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (935,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (935,205)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
Norval SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-765

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.