alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
O^T- C^ST'-^ooo-^^ ^ 

Pacific L.L.C. 

P.O. Box 20280 

Mesa, Arizon a 85277-028 0 

(888) 575-454 6 Tol l Free 

www.pacificwings.co m 

December 6, 2010 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, 

Essential Air Service Chief 

US Department of Transportation 

EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

W86-471 

Washington, DC 20590 

1 

CO 

V 

CO 

O 

CO 

c5o 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

As you know. Pacific Wings has been the only airline providing 

scheduled air service to Kalaupapa, Hawaii for more than a decade; 

much of that time as a subsidized Essential Air Service (EAS) 

carrier. 

After reducing EAS subsidies significantly between 1998 and 2005, 

Pacific Wings was able to eliminate them altogether in 2006, and 

the community remains subsidy-free today. 

In order to achieve sustainable subsidy independence it has been 

necessary not only to maximize efficiencies, but also to set fares 

at levels which reflect the actual cost of service delivery. 

Pacific Wings' Kalaupapa fares are comparable to those charged by 

subsidized EAS carriers in other parts of the country; however, 

current fares are higher than those charged by the airline during 

the period when EAS subsidies defrayed the cost of serving 

Kalaupapa. 

Over the past four years, the airline and the Department have 

received correspondence from various parties seeJcing relief from 

increased fares necessary to sustainably serve Kalaupapa without 

subsidy. 

The airline has spent considerable time in recent months doing 

outreach to determine the most effective response to these 
D. DEVANY 0 6 DEC 2010 

requests. There appears to be a community consensus that EAS 

subsidies could be used to lower fares and stimulate utilization of 

air service to Kalaupapa. It is at the request of community leaders 

that Pacific Wings submits for your consideration this notice of 

our intent to claim EAS subsidy at Kalaupapa, Hawaii. 

As a procedural matter, we understand it will be necessary to 

provide a ninety-day notice of intent to terminate service in order 

to trigger an EAS Request for Proposal by the Department. Through 

this correspondence. Pacific Wings is providing required notice. 

The airline will, of course, continue to serve Kalaupapa without 

subsidy throughout the RFP and carrier selection case, and if 

necessary, beyond. 

Pacific Wings will also continue to work with the community to 

ensure economical and responsible investment of any future EAS 

subsidies in Kalaupapa. The airline will withdraw this notice in 

the event the business climate proves incompatible with successful 

re-implementation of subsidies. 

I sincerely appreciate your attention to this request. 

Re sjjetrTFy^L 1 y, 

:eg Kah'lstorf 

Chief Executive ©fficer 

Pacific Wings, L.L.C. 

Page 2
EXHIBIT 32
----------

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Steven B. Solomon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of CT Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of CT Holdings, Inc.

/s/ STEVEN B. SOLOMON
Steven B. Solomon
Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2005



I, Richard Connelly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of CT Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of CT Holdings, Inc.

/s/ RICHARD CONNELLY
Richard Connelly
Chief Financial Officer

May 16, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 31.1Section 302 Certification I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing
distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by
this annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-44;  1.
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to
the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for
inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;  3.
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the
annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
and  4.
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee
and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth in
the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A. Date: March 29, 2005 By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Name: Ellen Z. Lamale
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
Patrick MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 27, 2018

Patrick Maxwell, Cross City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Maxwell appeals the postconviction court's order granting in part and denying in part his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The court granted Maxwell, a juvenile nonhomicide offender, a judicial review hearing of his lengthy prison sentence under sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes (2017), but denied his separate request for a resentencing hearing.

Based upon our recent precedent, we agree with Maxwell that he is entitled to a resentencing hearing pursuant to section 921.1402. *See**Katwaroo v. State* , 237 So.3d 446 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (holding that it was error for the trial court to amend the juvenile offender's sentence to provide for a review hearing without first conducting a resentencing hearing (citing *Davis v. State* , 230 So.3d 487, 488 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ) ). Therefore, we reverse and remand *278with directions that the court conduct a full resentencing hearing. We affirm the other issue raised in Maxwell's motion without further discussion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ricardo Bernandes, in my capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:



the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on April 29, 2005 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and the information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.



Dated: April 29, 2005



By:

/s/ Ricardo BernardesRicardo Bernardes,Executive Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer


|
|
Taylor Joseph BOGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1625

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Terrance L. ANTHONY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3409

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Eric HOPE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4086

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017 Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 31, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Sean K. Gravel, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence entered against Eric Hope without discussion but remand for correction of a scrivener's error in the judgment. *See**Ashley v. State*, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 n.3 (Fla. 2003) (defining scrivener's error as written clerical error that is not "the result of a judicial determination or error"). The judgment erroneously cites to section 782.07, Florida Statutes (2015), for the crime of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery and a firearm when the correct statutory citation is section 810.02(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2015), and erroneously cites to section 810.02(2)(a) for the crime of aggravated assault with a firearm when the correct citation is section 784.021(2), Florida Statutes (2015). The judgment also erroneously lists the burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery and a firearm conviction as a second-degree felony when it is a life felony, and it lists the aggravated assault with a firearm conviction as a life felony when it is a third-degree felony. We therefore remand for correction of the scrivener's errors. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER'S ERRORS.

SAWAYA, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Motion Granted in Part and Continuing Abatement Order filed July 26, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00739-CV

____________

KEN S. OGBONNIA d/b/a FIRST TEXAS ENERGY, Appellant

V.

A T & T ADVERTISING, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 988333

C O N T I N U I N G A B A T E M E N T O R D E R

On April 17, 2012, this court ordered appellant to obtain counsel to represent the 

appellant-corporation, First Texas Energy Corporation, on or before May 14, 2012. In 

addition, the court ordered appellant to file a corrected brief that complies with the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. On May 14, 2012, appellant requested an additional sixty

days to obtain counsel. The court granted the motion and abated the appeal for sixty days 

until July 23, 2012. 
2

On July 23, 2012, appellant requested an additional sixty days in which to hire 

counsel. Appellee filed a response in opposition to a third extension of time.

The court GRANTS a FINAL extension of time for thirty days to file an amended 

brief in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant may proceed 

pro se in his individual appeal, if he is unable to obtain counsel. NO FURTHER 

EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. If an amended brief in compliance with the 

rules is not filed by AUGUST 27, 2012, as ordered herein, the appeal will be dismissed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

The appeal remains ABATED, treated as a closed case, and removed from this 

court=s active docket until August 27, 2012. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s 

active docket at that time, or when appellant’s amended brief is filed. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may 

reinstate the appeal on its own motion. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Daniel Mirman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig
Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
 
 /s/
      Daniel MirmanDaniel
      Mirman
                  Chief Financial Officer
                  April
      12, 2008
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | February 1, 2011                            |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                        |   |
|   |  /s/ KAREN CARTE                       |   |
|   | Karen Carte                                 |   |
|   | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1262 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1262

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to require Federal employee 
    health benefit plans to include assisted reproductive treatment 
                   benefits, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2023

 Ms. Duckworth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to require Federal employee 
    health benefit plans to include assisted reproductive treatment 
                   benefits, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Building FEHB Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TREATMENT BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 8904 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the 
                following:
                    ``(G) Assisted reproductive treatment benefits.''; 
                and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the 
                following:
                    ``(G) Assisted reproductive treatment benefits.''; 
                and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) In this section, the term `assisted reproductive treatment' 
means any treatment or procedure facilitating reproduction that 
includes the handling of human oocytes, embryos, or sperm, including 
the following:
            ``(1) Assisted reproduction, including intravaginal 
        insemination, intracervical insemination, and intrauterine 
        insemination.
            ``(2) Preservation of human oocytes, embryos, or sperm for 
        later reproductive use.
            ``(3) In vitro fertilization.
            ``(4) Such other treatments, procedures, medications, 
        laboratory services, and technologies facilitating reproduction 
        as determined appropriate by the Director of the Office of 
        Personnel Management.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q, WHICH IS ATTACHED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000752634
<NAME>                        Earth Search Sciences, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,698,281
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      615,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                       339,125
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,554,778
<PP&E>                                          15,118,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,118,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,555,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,268,687
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000,000
<COMMON>                                           129,956
<OTHER-SE>                                         616,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,555,049
<SALES>                                            463,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   463,014
<CGS>                                              981,364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,884,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 135,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,435,247)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,435,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,435,247)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.011)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.011)



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT ERIN DEHART,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 16 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of May, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
James E. SAUNDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3141

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.09


Exhibit 10.09
**Exhibit 23.3**

 

**CONSENT****OF****Craig Scherba**

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-132294, No. 333-147214, No. 333-164982, No. 333-173881, No. 333-179827, No. 333-186917, No. 333-193061 and 333-201793) of NextSource Materials Inc., of references to the undersigned’s name in the annual report on Form 10-K of NextSource Materials Inc.

 

 

 

| DATED: October 31, 2017   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                 |   |
|                 |   |
| /S/ Craig Scherba         |   |
| Name: Craig Scherba  |   |
AFS-12-409-E 

May 31, 2012 

Mr. Gary J. Ohlinger 

4338 Thornton Road, SE 

Olympia, WA 98513 

Dear Mr. Ohlinger: 

This letter is in response to your correspondence sent to the public docket dated May 21, 

2012 (public docket No. FAA-2008-0907) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration 

for an extension to Exemption No. 9754. That exemption from 14 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) § 91.109(a) allowed you to conduct flight instruction in certain 

Beechcraft aircraft equipped with a functioning throwover wheel instead of functioning dual 

controls. 

On August 31, 2011, the FAA amended 14 CFR part 91 related to throwover control wheels 

(76 FR 54095). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information. 

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new rule, we will take no further action 

on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida Klepper 

Manager, Airman and 

Airspace Rules Division
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Crispin ALVIDREZ, aka Conejo, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50628.

D.C. No. CR-99-00083-DOC-16.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*136Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 12, 2004.

Miriam A. Krinsky, Asst. U.S. Atty., Susan L. Barna, Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert Edward Dugdale, USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard D. Rome, Law Offices of Richard D. Rome, Van Nuys, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Crispin Alvidrez appeals his conviction pursuant to a guilty plea to RICO conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

Counsel for Alvidrez and the government agree that this case should be vacated and remanded to allow Alvidrez to bring a motion to withdraw his guilty plea with the assistance of new counsel. We therefore vacate the conviction and remand the case to the district court for this purpose.

The Court has received and reviewed Alvidrez’s pro se supplemental brief. In light of the disposition in this case, we decline to reach the contentions raised in his brief.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Jatavia M. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2691

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.