alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
l 

THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 

August 22, 2013 

The Honorable Patrick J. Toomey 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Toomey: 

' -' ::- i /_ 

Thank you for your letter supporting the application submitted by the Joseph A. Hardy 

Connellsville Airport for a grant under the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small 

Community Air Service Development Program. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year, although no more than four awards may be to communities in the same State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types of projects that can be funded. 

On June 24, the Department issued an order setting a deadline of July 26 for applications. As 

these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any 

particular proposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all 

proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2013-0120 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Anthony R. Foxx 
PAIRICK J. TOOMEY 

''€'lli$YcVMIIA 

linit£d ~tares ~cnotc 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary ofT rans)lortation 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx: 

WASHINGTON, DC 20510 

July 25, 2013 

coo ... m<<S. 

HNANCli 

BANKING, HOUSING, AND 

URSAN AFFAIRS 

BUDGET 

JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE 

I am pleased to provide this support letter for Joseph A. Hardy Connellsville Airport's 

(JAHCA) application for a U.S. Department of Transportation Small Community Air Service 

Development Program grant. 

JAHCA's grant proposal focuses on a study which would measure air serviee deficiencies 

at the Airport, as well as measure traffic loss or diversion to other communities. A Master Plan is 

Cl.l.ITently being developed, it is general in nature, and should not be considered an in·depth 

analysis. With the anticipated completion of a Master Plan for April2014, the Airport Authority 

recognizes the need to continue moving forward with a more detailed plan. ln addition, if 

awarded, the Airport Authority intends to utilize a portion of the award for public relations, 

which is another element that has been nonexistent at the airport. 

In order to assist with JAHCA's project, I respectfully request that you give their 

application all due consideration. 1b.ank you for your attention to this matter.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2659 

To suspend temporarily the duty on methylated and butylated melamineformaldehyde polymer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on methylated and 

butylated melamine-formaldehyde polymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHYLATED AND BUTYLATED MELAMINE4 FORMALDEHYDE POLYMER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Methylated and butylated 

melamine-formaldehyde polymer (CAS No. 68036–97–5) 

(provided for in subheading 

3909.20.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2659 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  Ironclad
Performance Wear Corporation
 2201 Park
Place, Suite 101
 El
Segundo, CA 90245
 
  We
consent to the inclusion of the financial statements of Ironclad Performance
Wear Corporation and our report dated March 10, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of Ironclad Performance Wear
Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-139210 and 333-145855) on Form S-8 of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation
of our report dated March 10, 2010 relating to our audit of the consolidated
financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2009.
  
  /s/  EFP
ROTENBERG, LLP
 EFP
ROTENBERG, LLP
  Rochester,
New York
 March 10,
2010
Leondrae ENGLISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-935

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Thad Edward TATE, IV, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2493 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, polymer 

with formaldehyde. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6- 

triamine, polymer with formaldehyde. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2,4,6-TRIAMINE, POLYMER WITH 

4 FORMALDEHYDE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine, 

polymer with formaldehyde 

(CAS No. 9003–08–1) (provided for in subheading 

3909.20.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2493 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Lonnie Jay VANCE, DC# B14119, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-3978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

I, Jeffrey Cordes, certify, pursuantto Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation.

Dated: March 17, 2014

 

 

This certification shall not be deemed“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subjectto the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.
Elvis Alexander MORALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1226

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

I, Thomas Kreig, certify, pursuant toRule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the AnnualReport of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation.

Dated: March 17, 2014

 

 

This certification shall not be deemed“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subjectto the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.
```
Structured Asset Securities Corporation  Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2004-15
```

```
Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders for 2004
```

```
Class      Interest            Principal PaidRealized     Ending Balance
           Distribution                      Losses
```

```
A1I        636,120.16          1,218,970.21  0.00         33,197,029.79
A1II       1,977,276.71        3,809,717.00  0.00         122,519,283.00
A1III      377,775.00          0.00          0.00         19,710,000.00
A1IV       644,327.13          4,537,090.21  0.00         32,208,909.79
A2III      798,724.27          2,492,134.45  0.00         39,757,865.55
A3III      904,138.61          2,949,271.54  0.00         47,050,728.46
A4III      863,041.40          2,949,271.54  0.00         47,050,728.46
A5III      164,558.32          1,263,939.80  0.00         20,164,060.20
A6III      363,820.28          0.00          0.00         0.00
A7III      106,700.84          0.00          0.00         5,567,000.00
A8III      41,975.00           0.00          0.00         2,190,000.00
APII       0.00                65,353.43     0.00         2,467,862.57
APIII      0.00                40,481.21     0.00         1,213,804.79
AX         68,740.06           0.00          0.00         0.00
AXIII      17,130.39           0.00          0.00         0.00
B1         178,440.98          84,428.30     0.00         9,883,571.70
B2         32,759.52           15,499.98     0.00         1,814,500.02
B3         18,205.70           8,613.92      0.00         1,008,386.08
B4         10,919.84           5,166.67      0.00         604,833.33
B5         10,919.84           5,166.67      0.00         604,833.33
B6         7,348.55            3,476.92      0.00         407,025.08
E          0.00                0.00          0.00         0.00
P          11,857.73           0.00          0.00         0.00
PAX        21,580.57           0.00          0.00         0.00
PAXIII     7,264.77            0.00          0.00         0.00
R          0.47                100.00        0.00         0.00
```
Edward Baker EMAN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent.

No. 1D17-2784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert A. Archer, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 20-F/A1
of Great Panther Resources Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007,
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Great Panther Resources Inc.

|Dated: February 3, 2009              
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|                                     
|/s/ Robert A. Archer                 
|Robert A. Archer                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Principal Executive Officer          

---
# V
4/15/2015 CORNET, WALTER 

# J f
- OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE OF TEXAS PENALTYFOR PRIVATE USE i>'i OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ; P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

Tr. Ct. No. ujI ;o o. 20060D9 ^tesposv

PITNEY BOWES 

## 02 ir $ 00.26s 0002003152 APR 16 2015 

## riLEDFROM^82,1^-01 This is to advise that the Court has denied without written order the application for 

### writ ofhabeascorpus. '\^ """V '-*' Abel Acosta, Clerk
Gregory A. LATCHAW, M.D., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3127

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joel L. TALLANT, Sr., Appellant, v. Elizabeth C. TALLANT, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Mr. Bradley Clark

Kalitta Charters, LLC

843 Willow Run Airport

Ypsilanti, MI 48198

Dear Mr. Clark:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 61.3(a) and (c)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your October 24, 2011, exemption request on behalf of Kalitta Charter, LLC into 

the public docket (No. FAA-2003-16809), but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the 

following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption.
2

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3

Project No.: AFS-12-049-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-101:KJones:11/1/2011:Doc#33223

ARM-1/100/101:Program Office AFS-800

Statistics: Reject Letter.doc, 381 words

Original, 26 Oct 2011 08:35

Style Index 23 Excellent for a Legal Document

Average Sentence Length 21 Good

Passive Index 0 Excellent

MR BRADLEY CLARK

KALITTA CHARTERS LLC

843 WILLOW RUN AIRPORT

YPSILANTI MI 48198
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 BLUELINX HOLDINGS INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 February 29, 2008
    By:
    /s/  Howard D. GoforthHoward D. GoforthSenior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
v237299_ex4-1 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of SeaLife  Corporation (the Company),  does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that:


The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for three month period ended June 30, 2005
of the Company fully complies,  in all material respects,  with the requirements
of  section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and
information  contained  in the Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


August 18, 2005

                                   By:  /s/ Robert A. Mccaslin
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Robert A. McCaslin,
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
Anna WOLFE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-654

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Thilero TAPP

NO. 2017-KP-Q330

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00103-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF William D. STEWART, Jr.

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PC-0986

Honorable Veronica Vasquez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant Wayne A. Stewart.

SIGNED May 19, 2021.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Opinion filed J uly 11 , 201 3



### In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ _ _____

No. 11

- 1 3

- 00 032

- C V

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF T. D. R. AND S. L. R., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 70th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A

- 132,865

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Darrell Ratliff , filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order

relating to child support

. In letter s dated February 1, 2013, and May 3, 2013 , we

notified A ppellant that t he $175 filing fee was due in this case. In the second

letter, we informed Appellant that “[i]f the fee is not paid on or before May 13,

2013, this matter will be referred to our Court and the case is subject to dismissal.”

We have received no response to our letter s . As of this date, A ppellant has not

paid the filing fee.2 Because A ppellant has failed to pay the required filing fee , we dismiss the

appeal

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5, 42.3.

PER CURIAM

July 11 , 2013

Panel co nsists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.
Lee CORMIER v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-CI-0486

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  This Amendment, effective December 21, 2004 (the Amendment) to the Employment Agreement among KMG America Corporation, Kanawha Insurance Company and Paul P. Moore, dated December 21, 2004 (the Employment Agreement) is entered into by and among KMG America Corporation (the Parent), Kanawha Insurance Company (the Company) and Paul P. Moore (the Executive).  Terms used in this Amendment that are not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning given to them in the Employment Agreement.  Recitals:  WHEREAS, the Parent, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to correctly reflect that the Executive is not entitled to cash in lieu of unused vacation time.  NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, the parties agree as follows:  1.            Unused Vacation Time.Section 5(e)(i) of the Employment Agreement is replaced in its entirety with the following new Section 5(e)(i):  (i)Vacation.The Executive shall be entitled to five (5) weeks of paid vacation per full calendar year.  The Executive shall not be entitled to cash in lieu of any unused vacation time.  The Executive shall not be entitled to carry over any unused vacation time from year to year.  2.            Employment Agreement.All terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement that do not conflict with this Amendment shall remain in effect and are enforceable among the parties hereto.  3.            Governing Law.The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, without regard to its conflicts of law principles.  4.            Counterparts.This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.  5.            Entire Agreement.This Amendment sets forth the entire agreement of the parties hereto in respect of the subject matter contained herein and supersedes all prior agreements, promises, covenants, arrangements, communications, representations or warranties, whether oral or written, by any officer, employee or representative of any party hereto, and any prior agreement of the parties hereto in respect of the subject matter contained herein.  1    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date and year indicated below each of their names.




Attest:
        KMG AMERICA CORPORATION




By:______________________________
        By:______________________________Name:

Title:

Date:




Attest:
        KANAWHA INSURANCE COMPANY




By:______________________________
        By:______________________________Name:

Title:

Date:




Attest:
        PAUL P. MOORE




By:______________________________
        ____________________________________



2
Timothy Wayne BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4316

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jonathan J. SIMONELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2120

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Damien D. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D13-2779

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.