alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 - CEO Certification

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 906
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom L. Kirchner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ T. L. KIRCHNER     
|-----------------------
|Tom L. Kirchner        
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  August 12, 2009
Wally JEAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3719

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |                                  |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Dated: November 12, 2010 | /s/ MICHAEL BUSH                      |
|                     | Michael Bush                          |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | NTN Buzztime, Inc.                    |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2477 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2477

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain warp knit open-work fabric.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain warp knit open-work fabric.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WARP KNIT OPEN-WORK FABRIC.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Certain warp knit   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        open-work fabric                                                   31/2015.......
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6005.31.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document

Exhibit 10.02D

AMENDMENT TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED CHAIRMAN’S SERVICES AGREEMENT




This Amendment (“Amendment”) is effective as of January 1, 2022 by and between Choice Hotels International, Inc. ("Choice"), and Stewart Bainum, Jr. and amends that certain Amended and Restated Chairman’s Services Agreement dated September 10, 2008 between the parties (as previously amended, the “Agreement”).  


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained in this Amendment, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following terms:


1.  Compensation.  Section 3(a) of the Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following: 


a.Base salary of $450,000 per annum payable as follows: 


(i)        $150,000 in cash consideration, paid in bi-weekly installments; and


(ii)        $300,000 in restricted stock, in the form of a number of restricted shares that have a fair market value on the grant date (determined based on the New York Stock Exchange reported closing price of the stock on the date of the Company’s annual stock grant to employees) equal to $300,000, the vesting of which shall occur in three equal installments on the second day of the month following the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date.


            2.  Miscellaneous.


            (a) All other provisions of the Agreement not modified by this Amendment remain in full force and effect.


            (b)  The Agreement and this Amendment contains the entire agreement of the parties, and supersedes all other agreements, discussions or understandings concerning the subject matter. The Agreement may be changed only by an agreement in writing signed by both parties. 




Choice Hotels International, Inc.                            Chairman:




By:_/s/Patrick Cimerola___________                      _/s/ Stewart Bainum, Jr.________________
      Patrick Cimerola                                                   Stewart Bainum, Jr. 
      Chief Human Resources Officer
REGIONS BANK, etc., Appellant, v. AMERICAN LEISURE RESORTS, INC., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 3D16-2538

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Garbett, Allen & Roza, P.A. and Philip A. Allen, III, David S. Garbett and Brian P. Yates, Miami, for appellant.

León Cosgrove, LLC, Coral Gables and James R. Bryan, Miami, Scott B. Cosgrove, Coral Gables and Jordi C. Martinez-Cid ; Marcos D. Jimenez, P.A., and Marcos Daniel Jimenez ; Ross & Girten, and Lauri Waldman Ross, Miami, for appellee CDR Créances, S.A.S.

Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Cahill v. Regan*, 5 N.Y.2d 292, 184 N.Y.S.2d 348, 157 N.E.2d 505 (N.Y. 1959) (holding that, in construing the meaning and coverage of a general release, the court must consider the controversy being settled and the purpose for which the release was actually given); *Glassberg v. Lee*, 82 A.D.3d 836, 918 N.Y.S.2d 554, 555 (2011) (holding: "While the meaning and scope of a release are determined within the context of the controversy being settled, a release cannot be read to cover matters which the parties did not intend to dispose of, and unless it is shown that a specified matter was in dispute at the time a purported release was given, it cannot be held to bar the releasor's rights as to that matter") (internal citations omitted); *Wild v. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n*, 191 A.D.2d 995, 595 N.Y.S.2d 590, 591 (1993) (holding that "the law will not infer an intent for a party to release all persons, known and unknown, from all claims").
Karen E. RUSHING, Sarasota County Clerk of Court & Comptroller, Appellant, v. Kieran KELLY, individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of James Kelly, deceased; James Dermot Kelly, individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of James Kelly, deceased; Nuala Kelly; Aidan Kelly; Andy McDonald; Carmen Trotta; and Barbara Ford-Coates, Sarasota County Tax Collector, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4588

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2004-001
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10QSB, FOR JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,573,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,284
<INVENTORY>                                    499,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,255,031
<PP&E>                                         472,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                 297,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,438,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         5,069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,259,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,438,646
<SALES>                                        588,926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               698,091
<CGS>                                          323,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  380,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29,398)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,996
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (19,402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.004)


</TABLE>
STATE EX REL. Larry WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2245

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, his sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2450 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2450

To suspend temporarily the duty on nonenumerated footwear with textile 
uppers for women, other than house slippers, valued $13/pair or higher.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on nonenumerated footwear with textile 
uppers for women, other than house slippers, valued $13/pair or higher.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONENUMERATED FOOTWEAR WITH TEXTILE UPPERS FOR WOMEN, OTHER 
              THAN HOUSE SLIPPERS, VALUED $13/PAIR OR HIGHER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Nonenumerated       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        footwear with                                                      31/2015.......
                        textile uppers
                        for women, other
                        than house
                        slippers, valued
                        $13/pair or
                        higher (provided
                        for in subheading
                        6405.20.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

June 7, 2024

SC-2024-0307

Ex parte L.W. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE 

COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: L.W. v. Marion County Department 

of Human Resources) (Marion Juvenile Court: JU-21-206.02; Civil 

Appeals: CL-2023-0429).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on June 7, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Wise, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Sellers, 

Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
Ronald Tracy PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3712

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2014282EN.01000202.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2014 — FLS Plast A/S v European Commission

(Case C-243/12 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Plastic industrial bags sector - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Unlimited jurisdiction of the General Court - Obligation to state reasons - Attribution to the parent company of the infringement committed by the subsidiary - Liability of the parent company for payment of the fine imposed on the subsidiary - Proportionality - Proceedings before the General Court - Adjudication within a reasonable time))

2014/C 282/03

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: FLS Plast A/S (represented by: M. Thill-Tayara and Y. Anselin, avocats)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and V. Bottka, acting as Agents, and M. Gray, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2) | Orders FLS Plast A/S to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders FLS Plast A/S to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 20.10.2012.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3454-3455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01329]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 16, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice 
President), Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, 
Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Cyrus Bancshares, Inc., Cyrus, Minnesota; to merge with Quality 
Bankshares, Inc., Page, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Quality Bank, Fingal, North Dakota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Chebelle Corporation, Belle Plaine, Iowa; to acquire 100 percent 
of the

[[Page 3455]]

voting shares of Victor State Bank, Victor, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 19, 
2018.
Margaret M. Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-01329 Filed 1-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P