alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------









                  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Date:  October 21, 2003                      /s/ Tami J Story
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Tami J Story
                                             Acting Chief Financial Officer
RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION



I, Jacqueline Danforth, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of VioSolar Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.

presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control; and

6.

I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant change in internal controls or I other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  September 23, 2008





/s/ Jacqueline Danforth

Jacqueline Danforth

Director, Chief Financial Officer



Principal Accounting Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Panoshan Marketing Corp. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2010, and as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Berardo, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:        January 13, 2011





By:           /s/ David J. Berardo


David J. Berardo


President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer)
STATE of Louisiana v. Tommy William MANCHESTER

NO. 2018-KH-0519

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
# Official Journal C 166A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.166.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 166A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5612 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.166.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 166A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5612 June 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2013/C 166A/01 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2013/C 166A/01

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | APRIL      15, 2008 |                                            |
|--------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |                |                                            |
|   |                | /s/      MICHAEL GOLDBERG                       |
|   |                | MICHAEL      GOLDBERG                           |
|   |                | ACTING      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER             |
|   |                | (PRINCIPAL      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL |
|   |                |  FINANCIAL      AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)    |
Exhibit 32

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 906CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, TomL. Kirchner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jon Correio, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 
/s/ TOM L KIRCHNER/s/ JON CORREIOTom L. KirchnerJon Correio
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 10, 2006Date: November 10, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 999 E Street NW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2018-00941 Filed 1-16-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-2323

_____________________________

CHARLES L. SPANN, father,

Appellant,

v.

SHELLI D. PAYNE, mother In Re: 

A.J.S., a minor child,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

September 21, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY and NORDBY, JJ., concur; LONG, J., concurs with opinion.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

LONG, J., concurring.

I concur in affirming the trial court’s custody-modification 

order. I write to express my view that, contrary to one of 

Appellant’s arguments on appeal, the trial court did award 

sufficient make-up timesharing even though it was not explicit in 

its order.

Section 61.13(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2021), states:

[w]hen a parent refuses to honor the time-sharing 

schedule in the parenting plan without proper cause, the 

court:

1. Shall, after calculating the amount of timesharing improperly denied, award the parent denied time 

a sufficient amount of extra time-sharing to compensate 

for the time-sharing missed, and such time-sharing shall 

be ordered as expeditiously as possible in a manner 

consistent with the best interests of the child and 

scheduled in a manner that is convenient for the parent 

deprived of time-sharing. In ordering any makeup timesharing, the court shall schedule such time-sharing in a 

manner that is consistent with the best interests of the 

child or children and that is convenient for the 

nonoffending parent and at the expense of the 

noncompliant parent.

The trial court cited Appellee’s “persistent refusal to honor 

[Appellant’s] timesharing” as the basis for modifying the parties’ 

timesharing schedule. § 61.13(4)(c)(6), Fla. Stat. (stating the trial 

court “[m]ay, upon the request of the parent who did not violate 

the time-sharing schedule, modify the parenting plan if 

modification is in the best interests of the child”). But it also found 

“it would not be in the Child’s best interest for [Appellee] to have 

no timesharing.” 

It is clear from the text and context of the trial court’s order 

that when it awarded Appellant the majority of overnights each 

year, make-up timesharing was a part of that award. Section 

61.13(4)(c)(1) does not demand that every day missed be awarded

in make-up—it demands “a sufficient amount of extra time-
3

sharing” be awarded “in a manner consistent with the best 

interests of the child.” § 61.13(4)(c)(1), Fla. Stat. The trial court’s 

custody order complied with this mandate.

_____________________________

Charles L. Spann, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.
Demetrius Dwayne BROOKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-77

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Martin B. Carsky, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Great Panther Silver
      Limited for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report), as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Great Panther Silver Limited.                                                                                                                                           

|Date: March 29, 2012 | /s/
      Martin B. Carsky   
|-------------------- | -----------------------------
|                     | Martin B. Carsky             
|                     | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     | (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Panther
Silver Limited and will be retained by Great Panther Silver Limited and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5112]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 9, 2012; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

MEETING AGENDA This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Approval of the February 3, 2012 Meeting Minutes

III. Program Planning Update and Discussion of Projects:

 VRA Statutory Enforcement Report Update
 Human Trafficking Briefing Update
 Immigration Briefing Update. Discussion of potential field 
briefing.
 Discussion on 2013 Statutory Report Selection Process

IV. Management and Operations

 Staff Director's report
 Chief of Regional Programs' report
 Discussion on Agency Staffing

V. State Advisory Committee Issues:

 Review of two Hawaii SAC applicants
 Re-chartering the Indiana SAC
 Re-chartering the District of Columbia SAC
 Re-chartering the Utah SAC
 Re-chartering the Maine SAC
 Re-chartering the Nevada SAC

VI. Adjourn Meeting

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least seven 
business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: February 28, 2012.
Kimberly Tolhurst,
Senior Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2012-5112 Filed 2-28-12; 2:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Douglas B. STALLEY, as personal representative of the Estate of Tomas Cruz, Jr., Appellant, v. MUNEER INVESTMENTS, INC.; and Nebraska Food Market, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-1786

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 67 (Thursday, April 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0664]


The 12th Annual Food and Drug Administration-Orange County 
Regulatory Affairs Educational Conference; ``Regulatory Affairs: The 
Challenges of Ensuring Product Safety''

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following 
conference: 12th Annual Educational Conference co-sponsored with the 
Orange County Regulatory Affairs Discussion Group (OCRA). The 
conference is intended to provide the Drug, Device, and Biologics 
industries with an opportunity to interact with FDA reviewers and 
compliance officers from the Centers and District Offices, as well as 
other industry experts. The main focus of this interactive conference 
will be product approval, compliance, and risk management in the three 
medical product areas. Industry speakers, interactive questions and 
answers, and workshop sessions will also be included to assure open 
exchange and dialogue on the relevant regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The conference will be held on June 9 and 10, 2009, 
from 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: The conference will be held at the Irvine Marriott Hotel, 
18000 Von Karman Ave., Irvine, CA 92612.
    Contact: Linda Hartley, Food and Drug Administration, 19701 
Fairchild, Irvine, CA 92612, 949-608-4413, FAX: 949-608-4417, or OCRA, 
Attention to Detail, 5319 University Dr., suite 641, Irvine, CA 92612, 
949-387-9046, FAX: 949-387-9047, Web site: http://www.ocra-dg.org.
    Registration and Meeting Information: See OCRA Web site, http://www.ocra-dg.org. Contact Attention to Detail at 949-387-9046.
    Before May 8, 2009, registration fees are as follows: $675.00 for 
members, $725.00 for nonmembers and $475.00 for FDA/Govt/Students.\1\ 
After May 8, 2009, $725.00 for members, $775.00 for nonmembers, and 
$475.00 for FDA/Govt/Students.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ OCRA Student Rate applies to those individuals enrolled in a 
Regulatory or Quality related academic program at an accredited 
institution. Proof of enrollment required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The registration fee will cover actual expenses including 
refreshments, lunch, materials, parking, and speaker expenses.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Linda Hartley at least 10 days in advance.

    Dated: April 6, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-8135 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
ESCA INVESTMENT, INC., Appellant, v. Alejandro TARRAZA, Appellee.

No. 3D17-39

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., and Thomas A. Valdez (Tampa), David Tarlow (Fort Lauderdale) and Michael Wood (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Kawel PLLC, and Andrew Paul Kawel, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ESCA Investment, Inc., the defendant below, appeals from the trial court's order granting a new trial upon motion filed by Alejandro Tarraza, plaintiff below. The trial court granted the motion for new trial based upon the individual and cumulative effect of defendant's violation of an order *in limine* , improper closing argument (properly preserved by defendant's contemporaneous objection), and a determination that the jury's award of zero damages for future pain and suffering was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.

Upon our consideration of the trial court's careful and detailed seven-page order, and our own review of the record upon which the trial court based its determinations, we find no abuse of discretion. *See**Brown v. Estate of Stuckey*, 749 So.2d 490, 497-98 (Fla. 1999) (holding: "When reviewing the order granting a new trial, an appellate court must recognize the broad discretionary authority of the trial judge and apply the reasonableness test to determine whether the trial judge committed an abuse of discretion"); *Castlewood Intern. Corp. v. LaFleur*, 322 So.2d 520, 522 (Fla. 1975) (observing: "Since at least 1962, it has been the law of Florida that a trial court's discretion to grant a new trial is 'of such firmness that it would not be disturbed except on clear showing of abuse *1286....' *Cloud v. Fallis*, 110 So.2d 669, 672 (Fla. 1959). A heavy burden rests on appellants who seek to overturn such a ruling, and any abuse of discretion must be patent from the record"); *Ryan v. Atlantic Fertilizer & Chem., Co.*, 515 So.2d 324, 327 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (holding that the burden is on appellant "to clearly or plainly show that there was a gross or palpable abuse of discretion" in trial court's granting new trial).

Affirmed.