alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40541

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR ALVAREZ, also known as Pepe Quintero-Bojado,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:08-CR-485-1

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Oscar Alvarez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea

conviction for being found unlawfully in the United States subsequent to

deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court

reversibly erred when it enhanced his offense level for obstruction of justice

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. Alvarez does not dispute that he provided a false

name when he was arrested, when he was interviewed by pretrial services, and

when he appeared before the magistrate judge. However, he argues that the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 17, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-40541 Document: 00511028248 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2010
No. 09-40541

2

record does not support the determinations that he acted willfully and with the

intent to hinder justice. He also argues that his misrepresentation was not

material.

We review a district court’s factual finding that a defendant has obstructed

justice under § 3C1.1 for clear error. United States v. Powers, 168 F.3d 741, 752

(5th Cir. 1999). The record reflects that Alvarez used a false name when under

oath before the magistrate judge. This conduct was sufficient to support the

obstruction of justice enhancement, even without a showing of significant

hindrance. See § 3C1.1, comment. (n.4(f)); United States v. McDonald, 964 F.2d

390, 392-93 (5th Cir. 1992). We also conclude that the district court did not err

in finding the misrepresentation material. See generally United States v. Najera

Jimenez, No. 08-50913, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 226 (5th Cir. Jan. 6,

2010)(construing similar materiality requirement in 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and

concluding that the government need not show that it was actually misled in

order for a misrepresentation to be material). Therefore, the district court did

not clearly err when it increased Alvarez’s offense level pursuant to § 3C1.1.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 09-40541 Document: 00511028248 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2010
Terrell AGEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-502

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document

Exhibit 10.16



The following current and former executive officers have a percentage benefit multiplier under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan” of 2.4% or 2.0%, as indicated below, in lieu of the 1.6% of final average monthly remuneration benefit multiplier described in the Plan:
						
	2.4%	2.0%
	Blake W. Krueger
	Michael D. Stornant

		James D. Zwiers
# Official Journal L 345/20 N

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 345 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4720 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 345

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4720 November 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2004 of 29 October 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers | 85 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2004 of 29 October 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers

85

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00404-CV

JOSEPH YAMMINE, Appellant

V.

EMAD TAQ, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2022-005127-1)

October 19, 2023

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.2   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John F. McGrath, Jr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. February 06, 2008  /s/ JOHN F. MCGRATH, JR.John F. McGrath, Jr. 
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                |   |
|   | /s/ Mark D. Roberson                                                |   |
|   | Mark D. RobersonChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
STATE of Louisiana v. Matthew S. DAUZAT

NO. 2018-KK-0681

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 2018

Stay denied. Writ denied.
V.L.W., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-1250 4D16-1251 4D16-1252 4D16-1257 4D16-1259

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Telesat
Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michel G. Cayouette, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 25, 2016



|/s/ Michel G. Cayouette |                                      
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Name:                   | Michel G. Cayouette                  
|Title:                  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit
32.1





LIFEPOINT
HOSPITALS, INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William F. Carpenter
III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) To
the best of my knowledge information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:
      February 19, 2010
            
            /s/ William F. Carpenter
      IIIWilliam
      F. Carpenter IIIPresident
      and Chief Executive
    Officer
REGISTRATION

85678-19 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 *Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
21
22
23 *Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
24 *Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
25 *Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
26 *Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54

*Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
### f-^0 ^



### "rpARThiEK

T O FU.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N : •;-N!3PO[iTAnO

N ^FEDERA

L AVIATION ADMINISTRATIO N

§ I n th e Matter

of : § FA A Cas e No . 2009SWI7012 9 § FA

A Docke t C P No . - T o B e Assigne d CISC O AVIATION , LL C § Judg e No t Assigne d

RESPONDEN T CISC O AVIATION , LLC' S

ANSWE R RESPONDEN T Cisc o Aviation , LL C ("Cisco" ) hereb y files it s Answe r t o th e Administrator' s Complain t a s follows . 1 . Cisc o admit s paragrap h No . 1 . 2 . Cisc o admit s paragrap h No . 2 . 3 . Cisc o denie s paragrap h No . 3 . 4 . Cisc o denie s paragrap h No . 4 . 5 . Cisc o i s withou t

sufficien t knowledg e o r

informatio n t o admi t

o r den y paragrap h No . 5 . 6 . Cisc o denie s paragrap h No . 6 . Praye r Respondent

request s that

hearin g o f

thi s matter

b e i n Houston , Texas . RESPONDEN T RESPECTFULL Y REQUEST S tha t th e Administrativ e La

w Judg e enter a n orde r reversin g an ddenyin g th e Administrator' s Complaint an dassessmen t

o f acivi l penalt

y i n th e amount

o f $30,800.00 .

Cisc o Aviation , LLC' s ANSWER , Pag e 1 o f 2

### Re'spectfull y submitted . Georg e E . Cro w Texa s State Ba

r No . 0515190 0 Pos t Offic e Bo x 3 0 Katy , Texa s 77492-003 0 281-391-927 5 georgecrowfS.earthlink.net For Overnight

Deliver y us e Physica l Address : 151 9 Miller

Avenu e Katy , T X 7749 3 ATTORNEY I

N CHARGE FO R RESPONDENT CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I certif y that atru e cop y o f

RESPONDENT CISC O AVIATION . LLC' S ANSWER wa s served/file don Januar y 31 , 2011 , a s follows : Georg e E . Cro w Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Wilbu r Wright Building , Suite 2W100 0 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 (1 ) Original (1 ) Cop y Vi aCM/RRR710 2 382 3 052 1 519 3 159 9 Yoland aAyal aBemal , AS W -7E 3 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Southwes t Regio n 260 1 Meacha

mBlvd. , Roo m66 3 For t Worth , TX 7613 7 (1 ) Cop y ViaCM/RRR710 2 382 3 052 1 519 3 158 2

Cisc o Aviation , LLC's ANSWER

, Pag e 2 o f 2
From Boucher Michael

Sent Friday October 24 2008 536 PM GMT

To Ross.Philipeparnail.epa.gov

Cc Edwards.Denniseparnail.epa.gov Boucher Michael rnboucherrnckennalong corn

Subject RE your phone rnessage

Dear Phil

Thank you for your electronic message below and your kind assistance in this matter As an aside Buckman was not trying to

complicate EPAs life with the September 2008 petition to register ammonia for water treatment but Buckman is having tough

time in bad economy to compete with unregistered ammonia for the same water treatment applications and limited number of

industrial customers With its petition Buckman was trying only to provide EPA with additional information to facilitate the

Agencys resolution of the ammonia registration issue raised by Mr Goldberg for Nalco Buckman wants to be constructive part of

the deliberative process going on within EPA whatever that process is and only if there remains anything useful for Buckman to do

Accordingly we look forward to receiving further guidance from you next week at your convenience

Sincerely

Michael Boucher

Counsel to Buckman Laboratories Inc

McKENNA LONG ALDRIDGE LLP Attorneys at Law

Michael Boucher

Tel 202 496-7729

Fax 202 496-7756

Cell 202 306-1645

mbouchermckennalong com

1900 Street NW Suite 100

Washington D.C 20006-1102

United States of America

Tel 202 496-7500

http//www.mckennalong.com

ALBANY ATLANTA BRUSSELS DENVER LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PHILADELPHIA SAN DIEGO

SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON D.C

Original Message

From Ross.Philipepamail.epa.gov Ross.Philip@epamail.epa gov

Sent Friday October 24 2008 114 PM

To Boucher Michael

Cc Edwards.Dennisepamail.epa.gov

Subject your phone message

To Michael BoucherSony missed your call

will by to be back in touch with you next week with response to your question have call into my client to check on something
Thanks

Phil Ross

Philip Ross

United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of General Counsel Pesticides and Toxic Substances Law Office

202-564-5637
Exhibit 10.27


 


August 18, 2011


 


To:


Whitesmoke Inc.


 


Dear Sirs,


 


Re:  Irrevocable Undertaking


 


I, the undersigned, Yair Goldfinger, hereby irrevocably undertake to provide to Whitesmoke Inc. (the “Company”) an amount of $100,000, to be transferred by the undersigned to the Company within three (3) business days from receipt of a written request by the company for such funds.  Such request is to be received by me no later than October 31, 2011.


 


Should the Company request receipt of the funds the funds shall be granted as a convertible loan in accordance with the terms and conditions as the funds provided under the Convertible Loan agreement entered into between the Company and certain investors, dated January 2011, the terms of which I am familiar with.


 


Sincerely,


 



	
/s/ Yair Goldfinger


	  
	
Yair Goldfinger
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2581 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plastic device book style covers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plastic device 

book style covers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC DEVICE BOOK STYLE COV4 ERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2581 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Book cover style covers with 

an exterior surface of plastics 

(provided for in subheading 

3926.10.00) designed for 

portable electronic devices of 

a kind classified in headings 

8470, 8471, 8543 and 8517 Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Kirwan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: April 14, 2004 |  | 
|-------------------- |  | 
|                     |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fischer Imaging Corporation and will be retained by Fischer Imaging Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Shannon D. FULLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1130

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Lu Pingji, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China Housing & Land
Development, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls or procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
     being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
     fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: April 2, 2007

/s/ Lu Pingji
-------------
Lu Pingji
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
# Official Journal C 3/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 654 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 3

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 654 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 3/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: — 0,00 % on 1 January 2022 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 3/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: — 0,00 % on 1 January 2022 — Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN