alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         715,675
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,200
<INVENTORY>                                      6,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               746,380
<PP&E>                                       4,112,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                 848,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,967,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          904,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,166,648
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,203,420)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,967,568
<SALES>                                        128,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,988
<CGS>                                          116,485
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               179,982
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (182,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (182,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (182,320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,474
<INVENTORY>                                     57,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         439,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        236,587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,461
<SALES>                                         77,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,311
<CGS>                                           48,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,006
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

****

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

                (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

/s/ Hubert A. J. WhyteHubert A. J. WhytePresident and Chief Executive Officer

August 8, 2003

/s/ John F. McGrath, Jr.John F. McGrath, Jr.Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2003
Document



Exhibit 10.46


[Date]




Dear Executive:


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Assured Guaranty Ltd. (the “Company”) has designated you a covered employee under the Amended and Restated Assured Guaranty Ltd. Executive Officer Recoupment Policy dated as of February 21, 2022 (the “Amended Recoupment Policy”).  


Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Recoupment Policy, if you engage in Misconduct (as defined in the Amended Recoupment Policy), if there is a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements, or if there is an overstatement of the Company’s performance with respect to objective, quantifiable performance goals, then certain compensation granted to you will be subject to recoupment to the extent provided in the attached Amended Recoupment Policy.  


Your receipt of grants of equity or other incentive compensation is conditioned on your agreeing, by your signature hereon, to the terms of the Amended Recoupment Policy. 


In addition, you have been designated a participant in the Assured Guaranty Ltd. Executive Severance Plan, which was amended and restated effective February 21, 2022 (the “Severance Plan”), by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, with your participation and entitlement to benefits, if any, as provided by the Severance Plan (subject to all terms thereof ).  By your signature hereon, you acknowledge and agree that, in consideration for your participation in the Severance Plan and eligibility for benefits, if any, as provided by the Severance Plan, you shall comply with all of the restrictions and obligations imposed on Participants of the Severance Plan, including, but not limited to, the Participant obligations listed in Section 7 thereof.  You further acknowledge and agree that your failure to comply with all such restrictions and obligations shall cause you to forfeit any right to the Severance Payment (as defined in the Severance Plan) to the extent the Severance Payment has not yet been paid to you, or cause you to be required to repay the Severance Payment to the Company to the extent that the Severance Payment has previously been paid to you, in addition to being subject to such other remedies that may be pursued by the Company pursuant to Section 7.10 thereof.


Please sign and return a copy of this letter to Dawn Jasiak indicating that you have received a copy of the Amended Recoupment Policy and the Severance Plan and that you agree to their application as described herein and therein.  












If you have questions about the foregoing, please contact me. 


Very truly yours,


Ling Chow
General Counsel




Acknowledged and Agreed:




By: ___________________________________
Name: 




Date: __________________________________




2
A. S. J., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. C. S., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2360

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
James J. NIXON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 29, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00587

- CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Jeffrey Whiteside, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the written motion of the appellant to dismiss the appeal and

the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the same should be g ranted

. I t is

THEREFORE ORDERED that the appellant be allowed to withdraw his notice of appeal and

that the appeal be dismissed; that the appellant pay all costs relating to this appeal

, and that this

decision be certified below for observance.
#### Tania K. Espinosa RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-72893.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Tania K. Espinosa Rodriguez, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David M. McConnell, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*196MEMORANDUM **

Tania K. Espinosa Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) denial of her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo both legal determinations regarding an alien’s eligibility for cancellation of removal, *Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft,*277 F.3d 1137, 1145 (9th Cir.2002), and constitutional claims, *Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

Espinosa Rodriguez contends that the IJ’s application of the cancellation standard, which carries the heavier burden of showing “exceptional and extremely unusual” hardship to a qualifying relative, rather than the suspension of deportation standard, which does not, violates equal protection. This contention lacks merit because she was served with the notice to appear in 2001, when suspension of deportation was no longer available to her. *See Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, Espinosa Rodriguez’s equal protection contention fails. *See Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 602-03 (9th Cir. 2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
CERTIFICATION

I, Larry F. Vance, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Earth
Search Sciences, Inc., certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

          (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 21, 2007       /s/ Larry F. Vance
                              ---------------------
                              Larry F. Vance
                              Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
                              (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 99.1

Litton Loan Servicing LP Company Logo Here
An affiliate of C-BASS

4828 Loop Central Drive
Telephone (713) 960-9676
Houston, Texas 77081
Fax (713) 960-0539

March 10, 2005

GC04F2
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
1761 East St. Andrew Place
Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

RE: Fremont Home Loan Trust 2004-2, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2004-2

To Whom It May Concern:

The undersigning officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual
Statement as to Compliance as required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
for the above referenced security and certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Servicer during such preceding fiscal year (or such shorter
period in the case of the first such report) and of performance under this
Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under this Agreement for 2004.

Sincerely,

By: /s/ : Janice McClure
Janice McClure
Senior Vice President

By: /s/ : Ann Kelley
Ann Kelley
Secretary
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 77/2006

of 7 July 2006         

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Chapter I of Annex II to the Agreement shall be amended as specified in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

The texts of Directives 2005/39/EC, 2005/40/EC, 2005/41/EC, 2005/55/EC, 2005/83/EC, 2005/66/EC, 2005/64/EC and 2005/78/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES            

----

(1)OJ L 147, 1.6.2006, p. 30.

(2)OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 143.

(3)OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 146.

(4)OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 149.

(5)OJ L 275, 20.10.2005, p. 1.

(6)OJ L 305, 24.11.2005, p. 32.

(7)OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 37.

(8)OJ L 310, 25.11.2005, p. 10.

(9)OJ L 313, 29.11.2005, p. 1.

(10)OJ L 36, 9.2.1988, p. 33.

(11)OJ L 295, 25.10.1991, p. 1.

(12)OJ L 40, 17.2.1996, p. 1.

(13)OJ L 44, 16.2.2000, p. 1.

(14)OJ L 107, 18.4.2001, p. 10.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----

ANNEX

Chapter I of Annex II to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2502 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2502

  To suspend temporarily the duty on benzene, polypropene derivatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on benzene, polypropene derivatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENZENE, POLYPROPENE DERIVATIVES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Benzene,            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polypropene                                                        31/2015.......
                        derivatives (CAS
                        No. 3808-77-6)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3817.00.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Gerald Antonio WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/25/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 95-2098
v. (D.C. No. CR-94-310-JP) CHRISTOPHER CHAVEZ, (D. N.M.)

Defendant - Appellant.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Defendant Christopher Chavez pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. Based on the conspiracy plea and two prior felony convictions, Mr. Chavez was sentenced as a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2.2

Mr. Chavez argues that the Sentencing Commission exceeded its authority when it included conspiracy charges as predicate offenses for purposes of the career offender guidelines. Unfortunately for Mr. Chavez, we have previously rejected this argument. United States v. Allen , 24 F.3d 1180, 1186-87 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 493 (1994).

Mr. Chavez admits that Allen controls this case. He requests, however, that we “revisit and vacate” our previous holding. He unabashedly offers no basis for doing this other than his belief that Allen was poorly reasoned. This is insufficient for us to do what Mr. Chavez asks. As we have said before, “We are bound by the precedent of prior panels absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision by the Supreme Court.” United States v. Killion , 7 F.3d 927, 930 (10th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 1106 (1994). We do not believe the Killion case needs revisiting either.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
Yigal GAZIT, Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Successor by Merger to Bankatlantic, Appellee.

No. 4D17-319

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*