alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Eric MCDADE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2642

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

Eric McDade, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant/appellant Eric McDade appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b), on the grounds that McDade's motion was time-barred.1 We reverse and remand for further consideration of the motion, concluding that it was timely under the terms of Rule 3.850.

Rule 3.850(b) provides a two-year period for the filing of a motion for post-conviction relief "after the judgment and sentence become final." For purposes of that provision, a judgment and sentence become final "when any such direct review proceedings have concluded and jurisdiction to entertain a motion for post-conviction relief returns to the sentencing court." *Mullins v. State*, 974 So.2d 1135, 1137 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (quoting *Ward v. Dugger*, 508 So.2d 778, 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) ). Where there has been a direct appeal, the judgment and sentence become final upon the issuance of the appellate court's mandate on the direct appeal. *See**Beaty v. State*, 701 So.2d 856, 857 (Fla. 1997) ("[T]he district court of appeal's opinion became final when no petition for rehearing *129was filed within fifteen days, and the two-year period for filing a motion for post-conviction relief began to run upon the issuance of that court's mandate.").

In the underlying case, McDade's post-conviction motion, filed on August 30, 2016, was not untimely, as it was filed within the two-year period provided by Rule 3.850(b). Specifically, since McDade filed a direct appeal, this Court's affirming mandate, issued on June 5, 2015, triggered the two-year time period for McDade to file a motion under Rule 3.850(b). *See**Beaty*, 701 So.2d at 857 ; *see also**Rogers v. State*, 146 So.3d 1263 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ; *Mullins*, 974 So.2d 1135 ; *Jones v. State*, 602 So.2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). McDade's post-conviction motion, dated August 30, 2016, was filed well within the Rule's two-year limitation period. Accordingly, the order denying appellant's motion for post-conviction relief is reversed and remanded for consideration of the merits of the allegations.2

1

The trial judge relied on an erroneous computation of the applicable time period in the State's response to McDade's motion in the circuit court.

2

We express no opinion regarding the merits and substance of McDade's motion.
Project Summary: Age-dependency in Chlorpyrifos Metabolism For Public Release 

Project Summary: A project to determine age-dependency in the major pathways of 

chlorpyrifos metabolism in humans was recently commissioned by The Dow Chemical 

Company, and the work conducted by Battelle Laboratories (Pacific Northwest Division). The 

results of this in vitro metabolism project have been included in a draft manuscript, that will be 

submitted for publication in January, 2011. A summary of the authors’ findings are described 

below. These in vitro metabolism results will be incorporated into a LifeStage, physiologicallybased pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that will be used in a Source-to-Outcome Modeling Case 

Study, to be presented to the US EPA Science Advisory Panel in February of 2011. 

Manuscript Title: In vitro age-dependent enzymatic metabolism of chlopyrifos and 

chlorpyrifos-oxon in human hepatic microsomes as well as chlorpyrifos-oxon in plasma 

Authors: Jordan Ned Smith1*, Charles Timchalk*, Michael J. Bartels†, Torka S. Poet* 

*Battelle, Pacific Northwest Division, Richland, WA, USA 99354 

†The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, USA, 

Abstract 

Age-dependent, enzymatic chlorpyrifos (CPF) metabolism was quantified by in vitro product 

formation in human hepatic microsomes (ages 13 d-75 y) and plasma (ages 3 d-43 y) with gas 

chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Hepatic CPF desulfation (CPF to chlorpyrifosoxon [CPF-oxon]) and dearylation (CPF to 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol [TCPy]) Vmax values were 

0.35 ± 0.21 and 0.73 ± 0.38 nmol/min/mg microsomal protein (mean ± standard deviation[SD]), 

respectively. The mean (± SD) hepatic CPF-oxon hydrolysis Vmax was 78 ± 44 nmol/min/mg 

microsomal protein. None of these hepatic measures demonstrated age-dependent relationships 

on a per microsomal protein basis using linear regression models (p = 0.90, 0.60, and 0.17, 

respectively). Ratios of CPF bioactivation to detoxification (CPF desulfation to dearylation) 

Vmax values were consistent across ages (p = 0.87). CPF-oxon hydrolysis in plasma 

demonstrated age-dependent increases on a volume of plasma basis (p = 0.01), as did total 

plasma protein levels (p = 0.005). Mean (± SD) CPF-oxon hydrolysis Vmax values for children < 

6 mo of age and adults (≥ 16 y) were 1901 ± 663 and 6829 ± 1614 nmol/min/mL, respectively, 

over 3.5 times increase between these age groups. Plasma samples were phenotyped for 

paraoxonase (PON1) status, and frequencies were 0.5, 0.4, and 0.1 for QQ, QR, and RR 

phenotypes, respectively. These results will be integrated into a life-stage physiologically based 

pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model for CPF and will be useful for 

assessing risk of CPF exposures to children.
Romulus PETRINA v. Kimberly PETRINA

2150972

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017 Reh. denied March 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Fri Apr 11 15:50:09 EDT 2014 Leavy.Jacqueline@epamail.epa.gov FW: Regulations for GHG Emissions on existing Power Plants under the CAA, Section 111(d). To: CMS.OEX@epamail.epa.gov

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Barr, Carrie (DEQ) [mailto:BarrC1@michigan.gov] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 3:24 PM To: Mccarthy, Gina Cc: Brader, Valerie (GOV); Hedman, Susan; McBride, Bill (GOV); Brown, Eric (GOV); Quackenbush, John (LARA); Sygo, Jim (DEQ); Thelen, Mary Beth (DEQ); Patterson, Leigh (DEQ); Shaler, Karen (DEQ); Anderson, Madhu (DEQ); Hellwig, Vince (DEQ); Maupin, Mary (DEQ); Fiedler, Lynn (DEQ) Subject: Regulations for GHG Emissions on existing Power Plants under the CAA, Section 111(d). Importance: High
Ms. McCarthy,
Attached, please find the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s letter with regard to the above subject. This letter is intended to express our concerns, and our suggestions, for your perusal and consideration in the complicated task at hand.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call or write.
Thank you very much,
The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality



### Carrie L. Barr Senior ExecutiveManagement Assistant to Vince Hellwig, Chief and Lynn Fiedler, Assistant Chief Dept. of Environmental Quality - Air Quality Constitution Hall 2-South PO Box 30260 Lansing, MI 48909-7760 Office 517-284-6773 – fax 517-373-1265 BarrC1@michigan.gov Internet: www.michigan.gov/deqair 

## P Save our environment! Don’t print this email unless absolutely necessary!************************* ATTACHMENT REMOVED ************************* This message contained an attachment which the administrator has caused to be removed. ************************* ATTACHMENT REMOVED ************************* Attachment name: [image001.jpg] Attachment type: [image/jpeg]
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0000589 

11-JUL-2014 

09:38 AM 

SCWC-12-0000589
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

RICHARD K. MYERS,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-12-0000589; CASE NO. 11-1-1681)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee’s Application for Writ of
 

Certiorari, filed on May 28, 2014, is hereby rejected. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 11, 2014.
 

James S. Tabe 

for petitioner
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama


Sonja P. McCullen


for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 


/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
K.E., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3927

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Official Journal C 203/11 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 203 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4711 August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 203

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4711 August 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 203/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 203/2 | Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 | 2 |
| 2004/C 203/3 | Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 4 |
| 2004/C 203/4 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain tube or pipe fittings originating in Taiwan and Vietnam | 5 |
| 2004/C 203/5 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 10 |
| 2004/C 203/6 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 17 |
| 2004/C 203/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3503 — PPR/FNAC/MARINOPOULOS/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 23 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 203/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 203/2

Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

2

2004/C 203/3

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

4

2004/C 203/4

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain tube or pipe fittings originating in Taiwan and Vietnam

5

2004/C 203/5

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

10

2004/C 203/6

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

17

2004/C 203/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case No COMP/M.3503 — PPR/FNAC/MARINOPOULOS/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

23

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            1989
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7902
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (283)
<INVENTORY>                                       5258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 16913
<PP&E>                                           59066
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (20217)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   55927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6789
<BONDS>                                           5000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            16407
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     55927
<SALES>                                          14427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14427
<CGS>                                             7630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1922
<INCOME-TAX>                                       759
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Dustin JAYE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2334

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,233]


KGP Telecommunications, Inc., Fairbault, MN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 12, 2009, in response to a 
worker petition filed by the State of Minnesota on behalf of workers at 
KGP Telecommunications, Inc., Fairbault, Minnesota.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of March 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-7752 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**EXHIBIT 21.1** **NATIONAL    INTERSTATE CORPORATION**    **Company1** **State/Jurisdiction**     American Highways Insurance Agency, Inc.      OH    Explorer RV Insurance Agency, Inc.      OH    Hudson Indemnity, Ltd.      Cayman Islands    National Interstate Insurance Company     OH    National Interstate Insurance Company of Hawaii, Inc.      HI    National Interstate Insurance Agency, Inc.      OH    Safety, Claims & Litigation Services, Inc.      PA    Triumphe Casualty Company     PA    Hudson Management Group, Ltd.      U.S. Virgin Islands    Safety, Claims & Litigation Services, LLC.      MT  1 All    subsidiary companies are wholly owned by National Interstate    Corporation, except National Interstate Insurance Company of    Hawaii, Inc. and Triumphe Casualty Company, which are wholly    owned subsidiaries of National Interstate Insurance Company.
7/15/2009 Page 1 of 1 

POSTFOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Summary Page 

Chemical ID: P-09-0286 Reviewer: Delpire 

Endpoints-Assessed Table 

Reasons for not assessing releases 

Endpoints/Assessment 

Cycles1

Releases 

Assessed 

in 

NCEM2? 

No XB 

Testing 

Required 

No 

Hazard 

Concern 

No 

Releases 

Release 

Below 

Acute 

Threshold5

Release 

Below 

Chronic 

Threshold5

Other 

Ingestion 

Surface water No NA X NA NA 

Ground water (landfill) No NA NA X 

Consumer Use: DtD2 No NA 

Inhalation 

Air: incineration (stack) No NA X X 

Air: fugitive No NA X 

Consumer Use: CEM3 No NA 

Dermal 

Consumer Use: CEM No NA 

Eco 

Surface water: ADR 

conc and/or PDM4

No NA X NA NA 

Consumer Use: DtD No NA 1

Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model. 2

Down-the-Drain 

3

Consumer Exposure Model 

4

Probabilistic Dilution Model 

5

The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses. 

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure 

assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch=s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**










We
      hereby
      consent to the inclusion of our Report of Independent Registered Public
      Accounting Firm dated January 6, 2006 regarding the consolidated balance sheets
      of Pacific Coast National Bancorp and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and
      2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
      stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
      2004, in the Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission.





/s/
      Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP


Vavrinek,
      Trine, Day & Co., LLP





Laguna
      Hills, California


March
      21,
      2006








-
        Exhibit
        23.1 -
# Official Journal C 381A/28 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 381A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5728 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 381A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5728 October 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2014/C 381A/01 | Recruitment for the european medicines agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2014/C 381A/01

Recruitment for the european medicines agency (London)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 381A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 3 |

2014/C 381A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-143522) of PokerTek, Inc. of our report dated March
      31,
      2008, included
      in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, on
      the
      consolidated balance sheets of PokerTek, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
      and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and
      cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, December 31, 2006 and December
      31, 2005.


/s/ McGladrey
              & Pullen, LLPCharlotte,
              North CarolinaDate: March
              31, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2250

MONTE MEDLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-02-2388-8-AW)

Submitted: July 30, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay L. Cohen, Chevy Chase, Maryland, for Appellant. Edward J.

Efkeman, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Memphis, Tennessee, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Monte Medley appeals from the order of the district court

awarding summary judgment to Federal Express Corporation (“Fedex”)

and dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination

in violation of Md. Ann. Code, art. 49B, § 42 (2003). Because the

district court erroneously denied as “moot” Medley’s motion for an

extension of the discovery period and otherwise failed to address

his motion for discovery in opposition to summary judgment, we

vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings. 

As part of the discovery process, Medley sought certain

records of similarly situated Fedex employees, and Fedex objected.

Fedex also declined to turn over the documents at a deposition

conducted on March 25, 2003. On March 26, 2003, the final day of

the discovery period, Medley filed a motion to further extend the

discovery period to facilitate the filing of a motion to compel

discovery. On April 24, 2003, Fedex filed a motion for summary

judgment. On May 15, 2003, with the summary judgment motion still

pending, the district court entered a “paperless order” denying

Medley’s motion for additional discovery as “moot.” Medley then

responded to the summary judgment motion and again moved for

additional discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f). On July 15,

2003, the district court filed a memorandum opinion and order

awarding summary judgment to Fedex, implicitly denying Medley’s

motion under Rule 56(f), and dismissing his complaint. 
- 3 -

Medley’s motion for extended discovery was not moot at

the time it was denied by the district court. Moreover, the

district court did not address Medley’s motion under Rule 56(f) in

its opinion and order dismissing Medley’s complaint. Accordingly,

we vacate the judgment of the district court, and we remand for the

court to consider Medley’s motion for an extension of discovery and

Rule 56(f) motion. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 (adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President and Chief
Executive Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|               |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|April 23, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ VICENTE WRIGHT                   
|               |  |  |  |  |  | Vicente Wright                       
|               |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
BURGER & BEER JOINT, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. Tony HANNAN, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-2101

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.