alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Kyle Thompson CROSBY, DOC #S32915, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
E. P., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2333

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jose Anthony HERNANDEZ and Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois a/k/a Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, Inc., Appellants, v. Rebecca L. HEIKKA, Appellee.

No. 4D17-0905

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2018]

J. Pablo Cáceres and Hudson Jones of Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, Tampa, for appellant Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois a/k/a Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, Inc.

Kenneth D. Cooper, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois appeals from a final judgment awarding Rebecca Heikka $361,775 in attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 627.428, Florida Statutes (2017) and as a sanction under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2017). Although we agree with Appellant that the trial court erred in awarding fees under section 627.428, the error was harmless because the trial court properly awarded fees under section 57.105. We accordingly affirm without further comment.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., and May, J., concur.
1Larry G. Massanari has been appointed to serve as Acting Commissioner of

Social Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2515

___________

Belva J. Vaughn, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

Larry G. Massanari,1 Acting * District of Arkansas.

Commissioner of Social Security *

Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 7, 2001

 Filed: June 15, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
2The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

Belva Vaughn appeals the district court’s2 order affirming the Commissioner’s

termination of Vaughn’s supplemental security income benefits, which had been

awarded in part because of her alcoholism. Having carefully reviewed the record and

the parties’ briefs, we conclude substantial evidence supported the Commissioner’s

decision to end the benefits. See 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2)(C) (individual shall not be

considered disabled for purposes of this subchapter if alcoholism would be contributing

factor material to Commissioner’s determination that individual is disabled); 20 C.F.R.

§ 416.935(b)(1) (2001) (“key factor” in determining whether alcoholism is material to

determination of disability is whether claimant would still be found disabled if she

stopped using alcohol); Pettit v. Apfel, 218 F.3d 901, 903 (8th Cir. 2000) (claimant

who is no longer using alcohol still has initial burden of showing that remaining

impairments are disabling); Rehder v. Apfel, 205 F.3d 1056, 1059 (8th Cir. 2000)

(standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See

8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2008



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                                         
|E.L. Spencer, Jr. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Robinson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
October 8, 2009








By:           /s/
David Robinson





David
Robinson


Chief
Executive Officer and principal executive officer
David KIMMEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2627

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Robert A. Virtue, President of Virco Mfg. Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:1. the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: September 8, 2006 */s/ Robert A. Virtue*   *Robert A. Virtue*   *President and Chief Executive Officer of Virco Mfg. Corporation*   I, Robert E. Dose, Vice President of Finance of Virco Mfg. Corporation (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto the best of my knowledge:1. the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: September 8, 2006 */s/ Robert E. Dose*   *Robert E. Dose*   *Vice President of Finance of Virco Mfg. Corporation*   These certifications accompany the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.**End of Filing**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,175,419
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,662,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                      71,358
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,613,379
<PP&E>                                        84,598,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                25,208,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                67,348,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,806,612
<BONDS>                                       34,790,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       97,450
<COMMON>                                         183,319
<OTHER-SE>                                    25,470,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  67,348,322
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,747,572
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,784,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (101,050)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,592,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  471,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              471,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     471,380
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .001



</TABLE>
SERVED AUGUST 16,2010 '-'7^ ^^^''xmm 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SYANGRO WEST, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10NM0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0622 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On July 6, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to as 

"Complainant") filed a Complaint. On June 17, 2010, Respondent Syangro West, Inc. 

(hereinafter "Respondent") had requested a hearing. On August 11, 2010, Respondent 

moved to withdraw its Request for Hearing, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 
SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

liiwiiMwiaii 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP05SW0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014' 

ONE COPY 

Alexander Anolik, Esq. 

2107 Van Ness Ave., Suite 200 

San Francisco, CA 94109-2572 

TEL: (415)673-3333 

FAX: (415) 673-3548 

Stellamaris Williams, Esq. 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., 6E 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: (817)222-5081 

FAX: (817)222-5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

Room 5411 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor (202) 366-2139; Legal Assistant 6-5121 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
UNIMAR COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

       Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
                        September 30, 1996
                           (Unaudited)


(1)  Unimar Company (the Company) is a general partnership
     organized under the Texas Uniform Partnership Act, whose
     partners are Unistar, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a
     direct subsidiary of Union Texas Petroleum Holdings, Inc., a
     Delaware corporation, and LASMO (Ustar) Inc., a Delaware
     corporation and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of LASMO
     plc, a public limited company organized under the laws of
     England.  Each partner shares equally in the Company's net
     earnings, distributions and capital contributions.

(2)  These condensed consolidated financial statements should be
     read in the context of the consolidated financial statements
     and notes thereto included in the Company's 1995 annual
     report on Form 10-K.  In the opinion of management, the
     accompanying financial statements contain all adjustments of
     a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair presentation. 
     Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results on
     an annualized basis.

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
     generally accepted accounting principles requires management
     to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
     amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
     contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
     financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
     and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results
     could differ from those estimates.





<PAGE>

                             UNIMAR COMPANY

SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                               UNIMAR COMPANY




                               By:  /S/  GEORGE W. BERKO    
                                    George W. Berko
                                    Member of the Management
                                    Board
                                    (principal financial officer
                                    and the officer duly authorized to 
                                    sign on behalf of the registrant.)


DATE: November 11, 1996
Fred M. STOTT, Jr., Appellant, v. Paul Richard SHULL, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-759

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| Exhibit 99.4 **Bear Stearns Series 2004-HE7****Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to****Certificateholders****for January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004****Ending Principal****Class****Principal****Interest****Balance**R-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 CE 0.00 13,320,608.82 25,427,258.33 R-3 0.00 0.00 0.00 P 0.00 1,402,914.53 100.00 R-X 0.00 0.00 0.00 I-A-1 8,078,659.35 230,861.61 29,205,340.65 I-A-2 0.00 365,930.63 47,737,000.00 I-A-3 19,669,052.19 1,500,196.47 187,330,947.81 II-A 50,890,642.46 3,560,029.63 449,238,607.54 M-1 0.00 462,391.46 56,233,000.00 M-2 0.00 465,717.13 46,453,000.00 M-3 0.00 137,872.48 12,713,000.00 M-4 0.00 142,664.12 11,736,000.00 M-5 0.00 123,695.27 9,780,000.00 M-6 0.00 154,169.13 8,312,000.00 M-7A 0.00 146,793.86 7,579,500.00 M-7B 0.00 146,793.86 7,579,500.00 R-2 0.00 0.00 0.00 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### GRIEF BROS. CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN CONTAINERS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-1023.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 6, 2004.

Gerard T. Gallagher, Principal Attorney, Baker & Daniels, South Bend, IN, David P. Irmscher, of Counsel, Baker *&*Daniels, Fort Wayne, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.

William H. Oldach, III, Principal Attorney, Vorys, Sater, Washington, DC, Robert J. Palmer, of Counsel, May, Oberfell, South Bend, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before RADER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Michael Dakota PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1890

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
J.L., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5464

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ricardo Bernardes, in my capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ending March 31, 2006, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on April 25, 2006 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such
quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.

Dated:
April 25, 2006



By:

/s/ Ricardo BernardesRicardo Bernardes,Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,379,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,447,381
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,002,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,074,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,002,797
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               715,273
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               586,118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             617,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (488,563)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (488,563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (488,563)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Tami J. Story, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Date:
      April 22, 2008
            /s/
      Tami J. StoryTami J. StoryChief
      Financial Officer