alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDED AND RESTATED
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company Executive
  Effective Date
 Code
   1. Position/Duties
 (a)  Board 
 (b)
 (c)
 1




---



##### 



2. Employment Term
 Employment Term
 3. Compensation and Related Matters
 (a) Annual Base Salary
 Base Salary
 (b) Annual Performance Bonus
  (c) Long-Term Incentive Plan
  (d) Other Awards
  2




---



##### 



4. Employee Benefits
 (a) Benefit Plans
  (b) Vacations
  (c) Perquisites
  3




---



##### 



(d) Business and Entertainment Expenses
  5. Termination
 termination
 (a) Disability
 Disability
 (b) Death
  (c) Cause
 Cause
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 (d) Without Cause
  4




---



##### 



(e) Good Reason
 Good Reason
 (i)
 ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 (v)
 (vi)
 (f) Without Good Reason
  6. Consequences of Termination
  5




---



##### 



(a) Disability
 Accrued
Amounts
 (b) Death
  (c) Termination for Cause or Without Good Reason
  (d) Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason Prior to a Change in Control
  (i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 6




---



##### 



(v)
 (vi) Pro Rata
Bonus
 (vii)
 7




---



##### 



(e) Six-Month Distribution Delay
  7. Mitigation/Release
  8. Change in Control Benefits
 (a) Definition
 Change in Control
 (i) person Exchange Act beneficial owner
 8




---



##### 



(ii) Incumbent
Directors person
 (iii) Business
Combination
 (iv)
  (b) Effect
  (i)
 (ii)
 9




---



##### 



(c) Excise Taxes
   10




---



##### 



9. Confidentiality, Nonsolicitation and Noncompensation
 (a) Confidentiality
  (b) Nonsolicitation
  (c) Noncompetition
  11




---



##### 



(d) Equitable Relief and Other Remedies
  (e) Reformation
  (f) Survival of Provisions
  10. No Assignments
 (a)
 (b)
 11. Notice
  12




---



##### 



If to the Executive:
    
    At the address (or to the facsimile number) shown
on the records of the Company
 If to the Company:
    
    R.G. Barry Corporation
13405 Yarmouth Road N.W.
Pickerington, Ohio 43147
Fax No.: (614) 866-9787
  12. Section Headings; Inconsistency
  13. Severability
  14. Counterparts
  15. Arbitration
 AAA
 13




---



##### 



Prevailing Party
 16. Indemnification
  17. Liability Insurance
  18. Miscellaneous
  19. Code Section 409A
  14




---



##### 



20. Full Settlement
  21. Representations
 (a)
 (b)
 22. Withholding
  23. Public Announcements
  24. Prior Agreements
  15




---



##### 



COMPANY:
R. G. BARRY CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ José G. IbarraName:
    José G. IbarraTitle:
    Senior Vice President  TreasurerEXECUTIVE:/s/ Greg A. TunneyGREG A. TUNNEY 16
Albert E. LYNGZEIDETSON, Appellant, v. William James CLARK, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1232

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Official Journal C 253/31 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6331 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6331 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 253/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 June 2020 to 30 June 2020(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2020/C 253/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 June 2020 to 30 June 2020(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 9 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 253/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 June 2020 to 30 June 2020(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2020/C 253/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 June 2020 to 30 June 2020(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

9

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Karrie L. BATES, Appellant, v. James C. BATES, III, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4309

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1
------------

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steven B. Solomon, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CT Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: November 18, 2005

/s/ STEVEN B. SOLOMON
------------------------
Steven B. Solomon,
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2009



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                       
|                                                            
|E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                           
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2606 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2606

   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on black 661 
                          inkjet printing ink.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on black 661 
                          inkjet printing ink.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLACK 661 INKJET PRINTING INK.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.39 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to black 661 inkjet printing 
ink) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.3%'' in the column 1 general rate of 
        duty column and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HOMESTEAD-MIAMI SPEEDWAY, LLC, Appellant, v. CITY OF HOMESTEAD, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2018

Scott A. Cole and Alexandra Valdes of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

John J. Quick and Laura K. Wendell of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Coral Gables, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*281The order to be reviewed by this appeal is a final administrative letter order of the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, signed by the Secretary and dated February 1, 2018. However, because the order has not been rendered by the agency, the appeal is premature. An order is rendered when a signed written copy of the order is filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i). Where an administrative order has not been filed with the agency clerk, the agency has not rendered its final order. *Hill v. Div. of Ret.* , 687 So.2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

As Appellant acknowledges, the order to be reviewed has not been filed with the agency clerk. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(b) (defining "clerk" as "[t]he person or official specifically designated as such for the court or lower tribunal; if no person or official has been specifically so designated, the official or agent who most closely resembles a clerk in the functions performed"). Because the order was not filed, this Court lacks jurisdiction to review it.

DISMISSED .

Makar, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17186-17187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13370-000]


Blue Heron Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Applications 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

April 7, 2009.
    On February 6, 2009, Blue Heron Hydro, LLC, filed an application, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the North Springfield Dam Hydroelectric Project, to 
be located on the Black River, in Windsor County, Vermont.
    The proposed North Springfield Dam Hydroelectric Project would be 
located at: (1) The existing 2,940-foot-long U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers North Springfield Dam; (2) an existing Corps intake tower and 
control works; and (3) an existing 1,200-acre reservoir with 50,000 
acre-feet of storage.
    The project would consist of: (1) Three new turbine generating 
units connected the intake tower with a total installed capacity of 
0.65 megawatts; (2) a new 12.47-kilovolt transmission line and 
transformer connected to an existing above ground distribution system; 
and (3) appurtenant facilities. The North Springfield Dam Project would 
have an estimated average annual generation of 2,200 megawatt-hours, 
which would be sold to local utilities.
    Applicant Contact: Ms. Lori Barg, Blue Heron Hydro, LLC, 113 
Bartlett Rd., Plainfield, VT 05667, phone (802) 454-1874.
    FERC Contact: John Ramer, (202) 502-8969.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.

[[Page 17187]]

Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings, please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13370) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8457 Filed 4-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0408. CHARLIE BRANNER v. CLAY PATE.

In November 2018, Charlie Branner entered a negotiated plea under North

Carolina v. Alford, 400 U. S. 25 (91 SCt 160, 27 LE2d 162) (1970) to three counts

of child molestation.

1 On September 21, 2021, Branner filed the instant pro se

mandamus petition seeking to compel the trial court to provide documentation

regarding the impaneling of juries during the court’s September 2017 term and a

transcript of the hearing on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The mandamus

petition was assigned a new civil case number. The trial court provided Branner with

some information about the juries impaneled and denied the petition as moot, and

Branner filed a pro se notice of appeal.

Although judgments and orders granting or refusing to grant mandamus are

generally directly appealable under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (7), under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act, any appeal in a civil case that wasinitiated by a prisoner must

come by discretionary application. See OCGA § 42-12-8; Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga.

489, 490 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Because Branner is incarcerated, he was required to

1 This is not Branner’s first appearance in this Court. Branner filed a pro se

motion to withdraw his guilty plea while represented by counsel, and the trial court

denied his motion, and he appealed to this Court. In Branner v. State, 355 Ga. App.

137 (843 SE2d 26) (2020), we vacated the trial court’s order denying his motion and

remanded the case with direction that the trial court dismiss Branner’s pro se motion.

Since that time, Branner filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of his

motion for an out-of-time appeal, which this Court dismissed. See Case No.

A21A0619 (May 26, 2021). 

November 08, 2021
file an application for discretionary appeal in order to appeal the civil mandamus

ruling. See Brock v. Hardman, 303 Ga. 729, 731 (2) (814 SE2d 736) (2018). For this

reason, we lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/08/2021
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2473 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2473

   To prohibit the establishment of new units of the National Forest 
System, National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System, National 
    Wild and Scenic Rivers System, National Trails System, National 
  Wilderness Preservation System, or any other system established by 
 Federal law, or any national conservation or national recreation area 
         without approval of the applicable State legislature.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Paul, and Mr. 
Hatch) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
            to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the establishment of new units of the National Forest 
System, National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System, National 
    Wild and Scenic Rivers System, National Trails System, National 
  Wilderness Preservation System, or any other system established by 
 Federal law, or any national conservation or national recreation area 
         without approval of the applicable State legislature.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Land Designation 
Requirements Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. STATE APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR FEDERAL LAND DESIGNATIONS.

    (a) Definition of Covered Unit.--In this section, the term 
``covered unit'' means--
            (1) a unit of the National Forest System, National Park 
        System, National Wildlife Refuge System, National Wild and 
        Scenic Rivers System, National Trails System, National 
        Wilderness Preservation System, or any other system established 
        by Federal law;
            (2) a national monument; or
            (3) any national conservation or national recreation area.
    (b) Prohibition.--A covered unit shall not be established unless 
the legislature of the State in which the proposed covered unit is 
located has approved the establishment of the covered unit.
                                 <all>
```
DARRIGO, DIAZ & JIMENEZ, P.A., Appellant, v. Cecilia DOMINGUEZ-GARCIA and Swope, Rodante P.A., Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-751

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1
​
​
EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
​
JOINDER AGREEMENT
​
This Agreement is entered into this 24th day of February, 2022 between Unity Bancorp, Inc (the “Company”) and the Participant signing below (referred to as “I” herein).
​
I acknowledge that as an executive of the Company, I have been offered an opportunity to participate in the Unity Bancorp, Inc. Executive Incentive Retirement Plan dated October 22, 2015 (the “Plan “).  By executing this Agreement, I agree to participate in the Plan and be bound by its terms and the terms hereof. 
​
If I am a “specified employee” for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, to the extent required to comply with Section 409A of the Code, any payments required to be made pursuant to the Plan which are deferred compensation and subject to Section 409A of the Code (and do not qualify for an exemption thereunder) shall not commence until one day after the day which is six (6) months from the date of termination. Should this requirement result in a delay of payments to the Employee, on the first day any such payments may be made without incurring a penalty pursuant to Section 409A (the “409A Payment Date”), Bank shall begin to make such payments as described in this Section 8(f), provided that any amounts that would have been payable earlier but for application of this provision shall be paid in lump-sum on the 409A Payment Date.
​
Pursuant to Section 5.1 of the plan, I hereby designate the following individuals as my "Beneficiary" and I am aware that I can subsequently change such designation by submitting to the Board of Directors, at any subsequent time, a written designation of the primary and secondary Beneficiaries to whom payment under the Plan shall be made in the event of my death prior to complete distribution of the benefits due and payable under the Plan. I understand that any Beneficiary designation made subsequent to execution of the Joinder Agreement shall become effective only when receipt thereof is acknowledged in writing by the Bank.
​
​
PRIMARY BENEFICIARY _______________________
​
SECONDARY BENEFICIARY_______________________
​
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them under the Plan.  In the event of any conflict between the terms of the Plan and the terms contained herein, the terms of the Plan will govern. 
​
​
George Boyan___________________
Participant Name
​
​
/s/ George Boyan_________________
Participant Signature