alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Kenneth M. ALLAN v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Hudson Specialty Insurance Company, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Selissa A. James

Kenneth M. Allan, et al. v. Bankers Insurance Company, et al.

NO. 2018-C-0142

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000751255
<NAME>                              DYCO OIL AND GAS 85-1 PROGRAM

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    26,341
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             82,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         108,587
<PP&E>                                20,981,447
<DEPRECIATION>                        20,892,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           206,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5,063
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               167,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             206,735
<SALES>                                  325,961
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         328,589
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            126,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          202,097
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      202,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             202,097
<EPS-BASIC>                                48.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Jason Edwin BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2189

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Lucille ROLLE, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Edward R. Rolle, Sheridan Glen Homeowners Association, Inc., and The Crossbow Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D17-1466

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I,Ricardo Bernardes, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 27, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2442 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2442

       To suspend temporarily the duty on 12-hydroxystearic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on 12-hydroxystearic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 12-HYDROXYSTEARIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      12-Hydroxystearic   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        acid (CAS No. 106-                                                 31/2015.......
                        14-9) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2918.19.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hubert A.J. Whyte, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 3, 2004

/s/ Hubert A. J. Whyte

Hubert A. J. Whyte

President and Chief Executive Officer

Page #
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSE LUIS CASTILLO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 16-50278 

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-05124-BEN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Luis Castillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 18 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-50278 

Castillo contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The 

district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 

51 (2007). The high-end sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 

18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, 

including Castillo’s multiple violations of supervised release. See Gall, 552 U.S. 

at 51. Moreover, contrary to Castillo’s contention, the record reflects that the 

district court considered his mitigating arguments and sufficiently explained the 

sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). 

To the extent that Castillo claims that the district court improperly considered the 

entire petition to revoke, rather than solely the admitted allegation, he cannot 

establish plain error. See United States v. Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 761-62 (9th Cir. 

2008). His counsel stipulated that the court could consider the entire petition.

AFFIRMED.
Jerry WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2353

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Andres RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-760

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Official Journal C 178/10 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 178 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4710 July 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 178

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4710 July 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 178/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 178/2 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA) originating in the People's Republic of China | 2 |
| 2004/C 178/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3396 — GROUP 4 FALCK / SECURICOR) (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2004/C 178/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3196 — BELGIUM CA — AGRICAISSE — LANBOKAS / CREDIT AGRICOLE BELGIQUE) (
  1
  ) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 178/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 178/2

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA) originating in the People's Republic of China

2

2004/C 178/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3396 — GROUP 4 FALCK / SECURICOR) (
  1
  )

1

6

2004/C 178/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case No COMP/M.3196 — BELGIUM CA — AGRICAISSE — LANBOKAS / CREDIT AGRICOLE BELGIQUE) (
  1
  )

1

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 16, 2010



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                       
|E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                           
|President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
EXHIBIT 10.2

<PAGE>



                                  RATABLE NOTE

$20,000,000                                                         May 1, 1997

     Seitel, Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Borrower'),  promises to pay to
the order of BANK ONE,  TEXAS,  N.A. (the  "Lender") the lesser of the principal
sum of Twenty  Million  and 00/100  Dollars or the  aggregate  unpaid  principal
amount of all  Ratable  Loans made by the  Lender to the  Borrower  pursuant  to
Section 2.4 of the Agreement (as hereinafter  defined), in immediately available
funds at the main  office of The First  National  Bank of  Chicago  in  Chicago,
Illinois, as Agent, together with interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof
at the rates and on the dates set forth in the Agreement. The Borrower shall pay
the principal of and accrued and unpaid interest on the Ratable Loans in full on
the Facility Termination Date.

     The Lender  shall,  and is hereby  authorized  to,  record on the  schedule
attached  hereto,  or to otherwise record in accordance with its usual practice,
the date and  amount  of each  Ratable  Loan  and the  date and  amount  of each
principal  payment  hereunder,  PROVIDED  that the  failure  by the Lender to so
record or any mistake in so recording  shall not affect the  obligations  of the
Borrower hereunder.

     This Ratable Note is one of the Notes issued pursuant to, and is subject to
the terms of and  entitled to the benefits of, the  Revolving  Credit  Agreement
dated as of July 22, 1996 (which, as it may be amended or modified and in effect
from time to time, is herein called the  "Agreement"),  among the Borrower,  the
lenders  party  thereto,  including the Lender,  and The First  National Bank of
Chicago,  as Agent, to which Agreement  reference is hereby made for a statement
of the terms and conditions governing this Ratable Note, including the terms and
conditions  under which this Ratable  Note may be prepaid or its  maturity  date
accelerated.  This  Ratable  Note  is  guaranteed  pursuant  to  the  Subsidiary
Guaranty, all as more specifically described in the Agreement,  and reference is
made thereto for a statement of the terms and  provisions  thereof.  Capitalized
terms used herein and not  otherwise  defined  herein are used with the meanings
attributed to them in the Agreement.

     THIS RATABLE NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
INTERNAL  LAWS  (AND NOT THE LAW OF  CONFLICTS)  OF THE STATE OF  ILLINOIS,  BUT
GIVING EFFECT TO FEDERAL LAWS APPLICABLE TO NATIONAL BANKS.


                                  SEITEL, INC.


                                  By:         /s/ Debra D. Valice
                                              ---------------------------------
                                  Print Name: Debra D. Valice
                                              ---------------------------------
                                  Title:      Vice President
                                              ---------------------------------
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2572 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain wide-range high sensitivity zoom 

security cameras. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain wide-range high 

sensitivity zoom security cameras. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WIDE-RANGE HIGH SENSITIVITY 

4 ZOOM SECURITY CAMERAS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2572 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 High definition (HD)720p or 

1080p and standard definition (540 TV lines)zoom 

camera modules, the foregoing with 0.96 or more 

megapixel but not greater 

than 2.3 megapixel, standard 

definition low light performance sensors (540 TV lines 

resolution), optical zoom 

lenses from 18X to 36X zoom 

range, wide dynamic range, 

electronic image stabilization 

(EIS), 3D mode:8 zone Privacy Masking (provided for in 

subheading 8525.80.30) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,436,735
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         700,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                106,077,282
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     106,077,282
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       106,077,282
<LOANS>                                    532,889,354
<ALLOWANCE>                                  6,643,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             717,156,089
<DEPOSITS>                                 609,728,525
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,166,977
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         10,230,535
<LONG-TERM>                                 53,938,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       467,499
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,623,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             717,156,089
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             40,244,586
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,889,456
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               228,755
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            45,362,797
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          22,019,075
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          24,804,932
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       20,557,865
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                6,955,890
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              18,298
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             23,111,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,819,337)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  (1,819,337)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,000,801)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.21)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.46
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,712,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 2,177,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,603,128
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                3,119,050
<RECOVERIES>                                   203,542
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            6,643,510
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         6,643,510
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
James E. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3668

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000751256
<NAME>                              DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1985-2 LTD PSHIP

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                   29,223
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            26,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         55,930
<PP&E>                               22,431,141
<DEPRECIATION>                       22,395,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          145,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     3,602
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              133,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            145,277
<SALES>                                  99,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         99,849
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            88,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          11,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      11,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             11,717
<EPS-BASIC>                              2.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0



</TABLE>
Shawn Ryan DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1635

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
-77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6

 38.4

 38.6

 38.8

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL