alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 343/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 343 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6210 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 343

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6210 October 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | OLAF Supervisory Committee |
| 2019/C 343/01 | Activity Report of the OLAF Supervisory Committee — 2018 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

OLAF Supervisory Committee

2019/C 343/01

Activity Report of the OLAF Supervisory Committee — 2018

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,807
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,080)
<INVENTORY>                                    155,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,473
<PP&E>                                         455,771
<DEPRECIATION>                               (198,075)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 521,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,123
<BONDS>                                        220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   521,277
<SALES>                                        170,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,264
<CGS>                                          135,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   180
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,099
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,461
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8400]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Plumas County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Plumas County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold 
a meeting on April 24, 2009, in Quincy, CA. The purpose of the meeting 
is to review applications for Cycle 8 funding and select projects to be 
recommended to the Plumas National Forest Supervisor for calendar year 
2009 funding consideration. The funding is available under Title II 
provisions of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination 
Act of 2000.

Date & Address: The meeting will take place from 9:30-3 at the Mineral 
Building Plumas/Sierra County Fairgrounds, 208 Fairgrounds Road, 
Quincy, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (Or for special needs): Lee Anne 
Schramel Taylor, Forest Coordinator, USDA, Plumas National Forest, P.O. 
Box 11500/159 Lawrence Street, Quincy, CA, 95971; (530) 283-7850; or by 
e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#02676376637b6e6d704264712c6467662c7771"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3868297829a8f8c91a38590cd858687cd9690">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items for the April 24 meeting 
include: (1) Forest Service Update; (2) Committee Review of 
Applications; and, (3) Recommendations for Cycle 8 funding 
distribution. The meetings are open to the public and individuals may 
address the Committee after being recognized by the Chair. Other RAC 
information may be obtained at http://www.fs.fed.us./srs.

    Dated: April 6, 2009.
Mark Beaulieu,
Public Services Staff Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-8400 Filed 4-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 07-14-00428-CR

Robert Emmanuel Digman

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 251st District Court of

 Randall County

December 23, 2014

Opinion by Justice Campbell

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated December 23, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
Clarification and Additional Information about the Uncertainty Analysis Presented 

in Appendix B of the TSD for the Proposal of Subpart I of the EPA GHG MRR 

May 27, 2010 

The following questions were submitted to EPA on May 10, 2010 during the public 

comment period from Laurie Beu, consultant to ISMI. 

1. For the emission factors, it says "Data from a database containing industry 

confidential business information were averaged...", was this the data sanitized 

and submitted by SEMI in January? Was IPCC 2006 data also used or was it 

strictly the recently submitted data? 

EPA Response: The emission factors for the variant of the refined process 

category method that was analyzed in the uncertainty analysis and presented in 

the TSD (available in EPA docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927) were developed 

using the 2006 IPCC database. This was not the data that was received in 

cooperation SEMI, as the analysis was completed before that data was provided. 

2. In running the Monte Carlo simulation, it says that we assumed zero and 10% 

relative errors around the cases where only one data entry was available. Did you 

have cases where only a few data entries were available (>5) and what were your 

assumptions for those cases? 

EPA Response: In general, the uncertainty of each emission factor representing a 

refined process category was calculated based on the standard deviation1

 of the 

emission factors measured for that process category in the 2006 IPCC dataset (see 

section B.2, page 25, of the TSD). The exception was when a standard deviation 

couldn't be calculated because just one datum was available. In that case two runs 

were conducted. For one run, zero percent relative error was assumed around 

these factors and for the other run 10% relative error was assumed per the ISMI 

Guidelines. The difference in results between these two runs based on these 

different assumptions was inconsequential (see section B.3, page 28, of the TSD). 

3. Also, for the Monte Carlo simulation, we would like to understand the model 

from which you are generating data, including which terms in that model 

are stochastically generated and which are fixed. We would like to know the 

exact distributions used for the stochastic terms. 

EPA Response: During the Monte Carlo simulation of errors in calculated 

emissions, errors in EFs (both process utilization and by-product formation 

factors) were assumed to be log normally distributed for both the Tier 2b and 

Refined Methods. 

 

1

 In the uncertainty analysis, the 95% confidence intervals presented in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for the 

Tier 2b emission factors were divided by two so that they would be comparable to the uncertainties 

calculated for the emission factors for the refined process method, which are standard deviations.
##### 



(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Paul O. BowerPaul O. Bower, Chief Executive Officer
March 25, 2011

Mr. Ed Lucke Acting Director of Aviation System Standards

Federal Aviation Administration Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center

6500 South Macarthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169-6901

Dear Mr. Lucke:

This is in response to the Aviation System Standards letter dated January 19, 2011, (public docket No. FAA-2011-0073) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of your organization for an exemption from § 183.1 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The Aviation System Standards organization has requested relief from the requirement of being a private person in order to hold a delegation under part 183.

Such relief is not available to AVN. The term “private person” is not within the FAA’s authority to redefine for individuals or organizations wish ing to avail themselves of regulatory programs. The requirement comes directly from the FAA’ s authorizing legislation in 49 USC § 40102(d). The agency cannot issue an exemption from its authorizing legislation. As recently as July 2010,

the FAA’s Office of the Chief Counsel has a ffirmed that government organizations cannot qualify as private persons for purposes of delegation authority (Legal interpretation to David Hempe from Rebecca MacPherson, July 21, 2010 on the meaning of private person). Moreover, AVN already holds the authority it seeks through specific delegation from the Administrator. There is no need for a part 183 delegation for AVN to continue its delegated functions.

We will close the docket on this request and take no further action.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
Document

Exhibit 10.10


OGE Energy Corp.
Director Compensation
Compensation of non-management directors of OGE Energy Corp. ("OGE Energy") in 2021 included an annual retainer fee of $240,000, of which $105,000 was payable in cash in quarterly installments and $135,000 was deposited in the director's account under OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan and converted to 3,744.8 common stock units based on the closing price of OGE Energy's Common Stock on December 7, 2021. In 2021, the independent directors did not receive additional compensation for attending Board or committee meetings but were instead paid a quarterly cash retainer. The lead director that served in 2021 received an additional $30,000 cash retainer in 2021. The chair of each of the Compensation, Nominating, Corporate Governance and Stewardship and Audit Committees that served in 2021 received an additional $15,000 annual cash retainer in 2021. Each member of the Audit Committee also received an additional annual retainer of $5,000. These amounts represent the total fees paid to directors in their capacities as directors of OGE Energy and Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company in 2021. 


Under OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan, non-management directors may defer payment of all or part of their quarterly and annual cash retainer fee, which deferred amounts in 2021 were credited to their account as of the scheduled payment date. Amounts credited to the accounts are assumed to be invested in one or more of the investment options permitted under OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan. In 2021, those investment options included an OGE Energy Common Stock fund, whose value was determined based on the stock price of OGE Energy's Common Stock. When an individual ceases to be a director of OGE Energy, all amounts credited under OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan are paid in cash in a lump sum or installments. In certain circumstances, participants may also be entitled to in-service withdrawals from OGE Energy's Deferred Compensation Plan.


On November 30, 2021, the Compensation Committee met to consider director compensation. At that meeting, the annual cash retainer was increased from $105,000 in 2021 to $110,000 for 2022 and the annual equity retainer, noted above, credited on December 7, 2021 was increased from $130,000 to $135,000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             968
<SECURITIES>                                        49
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3107
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1349
<INVENTORY>                                         55
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4762
<PP&E>                                           71755
<DEPRECIATION>                                   58412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2299
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           598
<OTHER-SE>                                       15381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18278
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2204
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (756)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (756)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1



# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Decided April 11, 2014

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 13

‐ 1742

C ORINA B ASS

, Plaintiff

‐ Appellant

,

v.

J OLIET P UBLIC S CHOOL D ISTRICT N O

. 86,

Defendant

‐ Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 11 C 8136

John W. Darrah,

Judge

.

O R D E R

On March 26, 2014, we issued our opinion affirming the district court’s judgment

dismissing appellant Corina Bass’s challenge to a grant of summary judgment in favor

of the defendant Joliet Public School District No. 86. We found so little merit in the

arguments that Bass raised on appeal that we issued an order to show cause to herNo. 13-1742 2

attorney pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38. In that order, we asked

the attorney to explain why he should not be sanctioned for bringing a frivolous appeal.

The attorney, Steven H. Jesser, filed a timely response to our order. In his response, he

acknowledges that this case lay close to the line, but he states that he believed in good

faith that his client’s case was not sanctionably frivolous. He notes in this connection

that his review of the record indicated that she was treated differently, and less

favorably, than a comparable male employee of the district. Finally, he apologizes to the

court for any miscalculation he may have made.

We are satisfied from his explanation that sanctions would be inappropriate in this

situation. We therefore D ISCHARGE the rule to show cause and we instruct the Clerk of

this court to forward a copy of this order to Illinois’s Attorney Registration and

Disciplinary Commission, so that its file will contain a complete and accurate record of

the disposition of the order in this court.
**CERTIFICATION**
 
 The
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of
title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Pacific Coast
National Bancorp, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Pacific Coast
National Bancorp on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
Pacific Coast National Bancorp. This written statement is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-KSB. A signed
original of this statement has been provided to Pacific Coast National Bancorp
and will be retained by Pacific Coast National Bancorp and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  Date:
April 15, 2005
  /s/
Colin M. Forkner
 Colin M.
Forkner
 Chief
Executive Officer
  /s/
Terry Stalk
 Terry
Stalk
 Chief
Financial Officer
[)ol-osr~ 2.DO! .. '+1 8'5 

Donald Kaspnak.-,- ,~- _,_ I\'1avor ,j, ,I I ',-, I 

41 Ci,,- H:..L I'Ll,'O 

- -'C-:-:-,' T:n'l Pldtt'l""~r~h. '.,J~w York L2'1Ul I" HIVi\ 

T: :51S~' 5:':)-7~l!~ 

r. :518, )02<'3,,:' 

may()rlLi;diy(")fr~a:t"bu~~dl-:;y,gnv 

January 27.2010 

Mr. James R Langley, .Ir 

Chairman, Clinton County Legislaturt: 

Clinton County Government Center 

137 Margaret Street, Suite 208 

Plattsburgh, 1\Y 12901 

Dear Chairman Langley; 

Jim, after reviewing the Public Law of 1978 (an amendment to the Federal Aviation Act 

of 1958), there is languagt: which states the area municipality hus a responsibility to 

participate in the decision regarding local essential air service. 

J understand the city rna) not have an official vote un this decision, however, I believe it 

is my responsibility as Mayor to provide you and the legislature with my opinion. 

1 have reviewed the bid proposals thoroughly and han! had discussions with l\1ike Colgan 

and Andre,\ Bonney. If J was involved in the decision-making process I \>,Quld support a 

t\\(l year commitment 10 Capc Air regardless of the concerns about plane size. ~ly 

reasoning is as follov;s: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Cape Air has more than doubJed air traffic locally in less than two years. 

Cape Air has recdved a letter of supporl and has an airline business 

relationship with Jet Blue which could be an outstanding carrier for the 

Plattsburgh 1nternational Airport. 

Cape Air has reduced its cost to passengers in this proposal as well as 

adding an additional round trip flight from June to September. 

Cape Air enjoys same terminal connections 'with Jet Blue, Boston's largest 

100v-cost airline, which st:rves J.3 of Boston '5 15 most popuiar destinations 

which is suhstantially mure than Colgan/US Airways. 

In speaking with a number of city residents, an oYerwhclming majority arc pleased \vith 

Cape Air's service and cost. 

1n closing Jimmy_ 1 understand a majority of the CounlY Legislature is supporting Colgan 

Air. As Mayor, 1 belie\e I have the responsibility to state my posilion on this very 

important matter. I have also included an October Busincssweek article discussing 

concerns with Us Nf\\-ays for your review, 
SincereQ. 

,;0/ '\ 

I ' ~ " 

Donald M. ~asprzak, Mayor 

City cifPlattsburgh 

DMK/bac 

Att. (1) 

Cc: Harry 1. McManus 

Samuel J. Trombley 

E. Tom Scars 

Sara E. Rowden 

Keith M. Defayette 

Rohert W. Butler 

Jackie A. \Valker 

John W. Gallag.her 

Rober! \V. Heins 

Michael E. lurlo
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2518 

To suspend temporarily the duty on aqueous mixtures of polyvinyl alcohol 

and polyvinyl pyrrolidone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on aqueous mixtures of 

polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl pyrrolidone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AQUEOUS MIXTURES OF POLYVINYL ALCOHOL 

4 AND POLYVINYL PYRROLIDONE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2518 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Aqueous mixtures of polyvinyl 

alcohol (CAS No. 98002–48– 

3) and polyvinyl pyrrolidone 

(CAS No. 9003–39–8) (provided for in subheading 

3905.99.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
David J. WHITE, Appellant, v. Vonda K. WHITE, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D17-1467 2D17-2291 CONSOLIDATED

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Freddie T. MASSEY v. W. Dewayne MULLINS

2150981

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.