alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1237 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1237

To restore the exemption of family farms and small businesses from the 
  definition of assets under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 
                                 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2023

   Ms. Ernst (for herself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Lummis, Mr. 
  Ricketts, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Braun) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore the exemption of family farms and small businesses from the 
  definition of assets under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 
                                 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Farm and Small Business 
Exemption Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FAMILY FARMS AND SMALL BUSINESSES FROM ASSETS UNDER 
              THE HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF 1965.

    (a) In General.--Section 480(f)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087vv), as amended by section 702(l)(2) of the FAFSA 
Simplification Act (title VII of division FF of Public Law 116-260; 134 
Stat. 3163), is further amended--
            (1) by striking ``net value of the'' and inserting the 
        following: ``net value of--
                    ``(A) the'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting a 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) a family farm on which the family resides; or
                    ``(C) a small business with not more than 100 full-
                time or full-time equivalent employees (or any part of 
                such a small business) that is owned and controlled by 
                the family.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the FAFSA Simplification Act (title VII 
of division FF of Public Law 116-260) and subject to the effective date 
of section 701(b) of such Act, as amended by section 102(a) of the 
FAFSA Simplification Act Technical Corrections Act (division R of 
Public Law 117-103) (including the authorization provided under section 
102(c)(1)(A) of such Act).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I,Vicente B. Wright, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 28, 2004
7/15/2009 Page 1 of 1



### POSTFOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Summary Page

Chemical ID: P-09-0286 Reviewer: Delpire

Endpoints-Assessed Table

Reasons for not assessing releases

Endpoints/Assessment Cycles 1 Releases

Assessed

in

NCEM2? No XB Testing Required No

Hazard

Concern No

Releases Release

Below

Acute

Threshold 5 Release

Below

Chronic

Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion

Surface water No NA X NA NA Ground water (landfill) No NA NA X

Consumer Use: DtD 2 No NA

Inhalation Air: incineration (stack) No NA X X Air: fugitive No NA X

Consumer Use: CEM 3 No NA

Dermal

Consumer Use: CEM No NA

Eco

Surface water: ADR

conc and/or PDM 4 No NA X NA NA

Consumer Use: DtD No NA

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.

2 Down-the-Drain

3 Consumer Exposure Model

4 Probabilistic Dilution Model

5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch = s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).
STATE of Louisiana v. Brian DIETRICH

No. 2017-KP-0801

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Writ denied. Relator shows no error or abuse of discretion in the district court's dismissal of his claims on procedural grounds. *See* La.C.Cr.P. arts. 930.4 & 930.8 ; *see also**State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated at least three applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1372 

To prohibit certain business concerns from receiving assistance from the 

Small Business Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain business concerns from receiving assistance from the Small Business Administration, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing SBA As5 sistance from Going to China Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AFFILIATION WITH THE PEOPLE’S 

7 REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(a) of the Small Busi9 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1372 IS

1 ‘‘(10) PROHIBITION ON AFFILIATION WITH THE

2 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.—For purposes of 

3 this Act, a small business concern may not— 

4 ‘‘(A) be headquartered in the People’s Re5 public of China; or 

6 ‘‘(B) have more than 25 percent of the vot7 ing stock of the small business concern owned 

8 by affiliates that are citizens of the People’s Re9 public of China.’’. 

10 (b) REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE.—The Adminis11 trator of the Small Business Administration shall amend 

12 the regulations and guidance of the Administration, in13 cluding sections 120.100, 120.110, and 121.105 of title 

14 13, Code of Federal Regulations, to carry out the amend15 ment made by this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal L 82/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 82 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6319 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 82

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6319 March 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/412 of 12 March 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Cinta Senese’ (PDO)) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/412 of 12 March 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Cinta Senese’ (PDO))

1

| | | III   Other acts |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 83/19/COL of 28 November 2019 Trondheim Spektrum (Norway) [2020/413] | 3 |

III   Other acts

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 83/19/COL of 28 November 2019 Trondheim Spektrum (Norway) [2020/413]

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
STATE EX REL. Timothy J. MAZIQUE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0139

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

Denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Desean Laverne McPherson, Appellant

No. 06-18-00218-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 27362). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Desean Laverne McPherson, pay all costs of this 

appeal.

RENDERED MAY 23, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 14, 2003                   /s/ Larry F Vance
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Larry F Vance
                                           Chairman of the Board and
                                           Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Electronics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Lorin E. Krueger, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 16, 2004 /s/ Lorin E. KruegerLorin E. KruegerChief Executive Officer
ex10-35.htm


 


Exhibit 10.35













 




  





1











  











  






 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  









 


 


5
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

INGRID URAMA RAMOS-PEREZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72209

Agency No. A070-803-444

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 13, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Ingrid Urama Ramos-Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

FILED

NOV 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-72209

reopen, Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 674 (9th Cir. 2011), and we deny the

petition for review.

In her opening brief, Ramos-Perez fails to raise, and therefore has waived,

any challenge to the BIA’s dispositive determination that she failed to demonstrate

the due diligence required to obtain equitable tolling of the filing deadline for her

untimely motion to reopen. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir.

2011) (issues not raised in a petitioner’s opening brief are deemed waived). 

In light of our disposition, we need not reach Ramos-Perez’s contentions

concerning her eligibility for asylum and related relief.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit
31.1  Section 302 CEO Certification





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Donald A. Gilles, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007,
of Valley Commerce Bancorp;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2006 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
      March 18, 2008/s/Donald A. GillesDonald
      A. GillesPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWeconsent to the incorporation by reference in the followingRegistration Statements of BlueLinx Holdings Inc.:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124721) pertaining to the BlueLinx Holdings Inc.Equity Incentive Plan; (2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-128091) pertaining to the BlueLinx CorporationHourly Savings Plan and the BlueLinx Corporation Salaried SavingsPlan; and (3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-134612) pertaining to the BlueLinx Holdings Inc.2006 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan;of our reports dated February 23, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofBlueLinx Holdings Inc. (formerly known as ABP Distribution Holdings Inc.) and subsidiaries for theyears ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and for the period from inception (March 8,2004) to January 1, 2005, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of BlueLinx Holdings Inc., and of our report dated March 20, 2005, with respect to thefinancial statements of the Building Products Distribution Division of Georgia-Pacific Corporationfor the period from January 4, 2004 to May 7, 2004,included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 30, 2006./s/  Ernst & Young LLPAtlanta, Georgia
First Amendment to Crude Oil Storage Services Agreement


 Exhibit 10.9 
 SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR THOSE TERMS HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THE REDACTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED IN THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH TWO ASTERISKS (**). 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
CRUDE OIL STORAGE SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This FIRST AMENDMENT TO CRUDE OIL STORAGE SERVICES AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is effective May 1, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), made by and between Gavilon, LLC (“Customer”), with offices at Eleven Conagra Drive, STE 11-160, Omaha, Nebraska, 68102, and
SemCrude, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as “Operator” (each referred to individually as “Party” or collectively as “Parties”). 

RECITALS 
  

	 	A.	The Parties previously entered into that certain Crude Oil Storage Services Agreement dated effective February 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”).


  

	 	B.	The Parties desire to amend the Agreement as hereinafter described modifying Schedule A and Exhibit A. 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned Parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Capitalized
Terms. All capitalized terms used in this Amendment but not defined shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement. 
 Schedule A. May 2009 barrels of storage will change to **. 

Exhibit A. Tank 3505, a ** barrel tank, will be in service May 1, 2009. Tank 2523, a ** barrel tank, will be in service
May 1, 2009. Both tanks Gavilon has elected to take one month earlier than originally scheduled. 

Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and each of
which alone, and all of which together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 Effect of Amendment. This
Amendment shall be effective as of the Effective Date. Except as expressly amended or modified herein, all other terms, covenants, and conditions of the Agreement shall be unaffected by this Amendment and shall remain in full force and effect. In
the event of conflict between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, this Amendment shall control. 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the Effective
Date. 
  

			
	SEMCRUDE, L.P.
	
	 /s/ Peter L. Schwiering

	Peter L. Schwiering
	Vice President-Crude Operations
	
	GAVILON
	
	 /s/ Dennis Stieren

	Dennis Stieren
	Vice President, Trade Operations