alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                         43,913
<SECURITIES>                                   102,547
<RECEIVABLES>                                  79,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,603
<INVENTORY>                                    19,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,093
<PP&E>                                         133,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                 83,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          64,475
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       216
<OTHER-SE>                                     242,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,021
<SALES>                                        45,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               71,426
<CGS>                                          18,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  33,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               34,779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,948
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .13
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Antonious Lamar Dotson, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-16-00139-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 371st District Court of 

Tarrant County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1410483D). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Antonious Lamar Dotson, Jr., has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 25, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### From

: "Yogesh Doshi" <Yogesh.Doshi@dep.state.nj .us> To: Richard Ruvo/R2/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Art Lehberger" <Art.Lehberger@dep.state.nj .us>, "Bachir Bouzid"

<Bachir.Bouzid@dep.state.nj .us>, "Francis Steitz" <Francis.Steitz@dep.state.nj .us>, "John Rees" <John.Rees@dep.state.nj .us>, "Kevin Greener" <Kevin.Greener@dep.state.nj .us> Date: 02/25/201001 :50 PM Subject: Re: Update onAEL/FSEL list
Rick : Sorry for the delay. Todate, we have 2 application pending for AEL/FSEL . l . UMDNJ - Requesting AEL for three 86 MMBTU/Hr each turbines and one 112 MMBTU/HR Boiler . 2. Georgia Pacific - FSEL for board dryer (75 MMBTU/hr total) Detail on both applications is attached with this e-mail . 

### My rough calculation indicates about 68 - 70 tons of NOx in avoided emissions, if approved . We have about extension requests from 3 or 4 facilities to submit AEL application at a later date . I will keep you informed as soon as we receive them . Thanks Yogesh Doshi (609)- 633-7249 (Office) »> <Ruvo .Richard@epamail .epa .gov> 2/25/2010 12 :49 PM »> 

### Hi YogeshI was just wondering if you have any info to share with us on the total # of AEL/FSELs received and the emissions associated with them . We are putting the finishing touches on our proposed rulemaking for Sub 16 and 19, and we need to understand the scope of these determinations in order to move forward . Thanks for looking into this . -Rick



### JRsAEL-FSELfacilities-2

-16-10.xls~ G) I ~ C ~1 N ~° ' w 3 =ic0 o r o I n ' cn I o i 

### I m m ~O m r- 

### r CA x m r

co ~ c ~ c ~ c O W O CZ) O ' ~ D 6 6

:3 Q ~

>' Q cn m m o ~ co o >

co o ~

co O

c

~ N ~ 00 Q Q7 OJ fD (o 0 7 it 7 *k O ~ it " < W " < N << "'

V7 3 cn (D v N N N ~ Qm ) Q~) 6W) cn

m co O) co y O i ,

j l i I I I , Q' 

### c Iz ~-a z Z D I~ 0 o 

### 3 °: ~ (D ~ G' °1 z I, cn OD ~ p~ o C y ~ U, =r 0 I Z, V o 3 °' ~ (D
^' O N

_. D iv W ~ ~o 0 c ~ cn W W A -i -C O) -''

Z .- Z Z M On Q ,°

. : U, a °: cD .A co p co a . °: < 00 (.WJt A CWn .A (WJi A 3

lu y y 03 y 3 

### 3
~ N 'T1 A i Q ~1 tfl O CO ' O (D W O ~ N

Z1 

### _ ? O ~" 

### II O o) , o)
-" ? O 

### z II cr z cr z On Q °: 0 3 °+ ° 3 °: 00 ~ . ,C) 0 00 3 C) a~ 3 C) o Q tA ~ ~ y C f/J D 

### -Nn °' ~ O ONO ~ O cn a. O

-- acn I I

Z -n o O7' " I ty z cr Z D 

### cn cu ° 

### I

o o g 

### o 2) " m

~ aw I ~ ' ~ ~ 

### r o 3 v y ~ ~Z3 W Q1 = y 0'p C y y W , ~a ~
_ . (D'

. . y W y ° n 3' `° o' . C

_ a N c Q c ~ N (p

Oa a 3 01 O ~ Np~ O cNO W O~' m CL 0- 3 C co
# C_2012227EN.01000602.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/6

---

Appeal brought on 19 September 2011 by Smanor SA against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 15 July 2011 in Case T-185/11 Smanor SA v European Commission, European Ombudsman

(Case C-474/11 P)

2012/C 227/09

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Smanor SA (represented by: J.-P. Ekeu, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Ombudsman

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 1 March 2012, the Court (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Smanor to bear its own costs.

---
Joseph TOOMER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Official Journal C 214/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.214.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 214 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5627 July 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.214.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 214

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5627 July 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 214/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2013/C 214/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 3 |
| 2013/C 214/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6872 — Barry Callebaut/Petra Foods — Cocoa Ingredients Division) (1) | 7 |
| 2013/C 214/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6970 — The Blackstone Group/Multi Corporation) (1) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 214/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2013/C 214/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

3

2013/C 214/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6872 — Barry Callebaut/Petra Foods — Cocoa Ingredients Division) (1)

7

2013/C 214/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6970 — The Blackstone Group/Multi Corporation) (1)

7

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 214/05 | Euro exchange rates | 8 |
| 2013/C 214/06 | New national side of euro coins intended for circulation | 9 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 214/05

Euro exchange rates

8

2013/C 214/06

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

9

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 214/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6973 — AXA PE/Fosun/Club Méditerranée) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 10 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2013/C 214/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6973 — AXA PE/Fosun/Club Méditerranée) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Brian T. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4884

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                               |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                               |   |
|   |   | /s/ Mark D. Roberson                                               |   |
|   |   | Mark D. RobersonChief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer |   |
|   |   |                                                               |   |
|   |   |                                                               |   |
Exhibit 4.8


 


FORM OF BENEFICIAL OWNER ELECTION


 


The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the enclosed materials referred to therein relating to the offering of shares of Common Stock of MGT Capital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


With respect to any instructions to exercise (or not to exercise) Rights, the undersigned acknowledges that this form must be completed and returned such that it will actually be received by you by 5:00 p.m., New York City Time, on [●], 2011, the last business day prior to the scheduled expiration date of the Rights Offering of [● ], 2011 (which may be extended by the Company in its sole discretion).


 


This will instruct you whether to exercise Rights to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock distributed with respect to the shares of the Company’s Common Stock held by you for the account of the undersigned, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Company’s Prospectus and the related “Instructions for Use of MGT Capital Investments, Inc. Subscription Rights Certificates.”


 


Box 1.  o  Please DO NOT EXERCISE RIGHTS for shares of Common Stock.


 


Box 2.  o  Please EXERCISE RIGHTS for shares of Common Stock as set forth below.


 


The number of Rights for which the undersigned gives instructions for exercise under the Basic Subscription Privilege should not exceed the number of Rights that the undersigned is entitled to exercise.


 



	  	
Number


of Shares

	  	
Per Share


Subscription


Price

	  	
Payment


	
Basic Subscription Privilege:

	
x

	  	
[$0.__]             =

	  	
$ (Line 1)


	
Oversubscription Privilege:

	
x

	  	
[$0.__]             =

	  	
$ (Line 2)


	  	
Total Payment Required

	  	  	  	
$ (Sum of Lines 1 and 2 must equal total of amounts in Boxes 3 and 4.)







 


Box 3.  o  Payment in the following amount is enclosed $__________________.


 


Box 4.  o  Please deduct payment from the following account maintained by you as follows:








	  	  	  	  
	
Type of Account

	  	
Account No.


	  	  	  
	
Amount to be deducted:

	  	
$  

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	
Signature(s)


	  	  	  
	  	  	
Please type or print name(s) below:


	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  





 


Date: __________, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1277 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 278
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1277

                          [Report No. 118-134]

 To modify the boundary of the Mammoth Cave National Park in the State 
                  of Kentucky, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2023

 Mr. McConnell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                           December 12, 2023

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the boundary of the Mammoth Cave National Park in the State 
                  of Kentucky, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mammoth Cave National Park Boundary 
Adjustment Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    Section 11 of the Act of June 5, 1942 (56 Stat. 319, chapter 341; 
16 U.S.C. 404c-11), is amended--
            (1) in the second paragraph, by striking ``the sum of not 
        to exceed'' in the first sentence and all that follows through 
        the period at the end of the paragraph and inserting ``such 
        sums as are necessary.''; and
            (2) by inserting after the second paragraph the following:
    ``The Secretary of the Interior may acquire approximately 980 acres 
of the land and any interests in the land generally depicted on the map 
entitled `Mammoth Cave National Park Proposed Southern Boundary 
Expansion Edmonson and Barren Counties, Kentucky', numbered 135/177, 
967, and dated April 28, 2022, for inclusion in the Mammoth Cave 
National Park.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 278

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1277

                          [Report No. 118-134]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To modify the boundary of the Mammoth Cave National Park in the State 
                  of Kentucky, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 12, 2023

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11 -- STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The following tabulation presents the calculation of primary and fully diluted
earnings per common share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2000 and
1999:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Six Months Ended                Three Months Ended
                                                              June 30,                          June 30,
                                                     ---------------------------      ----------------------------
                                                         2000            1999             2000             1999
                                                     -----------     -----------      -----------      -----------
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>              <C>              <C>
Reported net income.............................     $   757,150     $ 1,172,359      $   303,213      $   585,905

Earnings on common shares.......................     $   757,150     $ 1,172,359      $   303,213      $   585,905
                                                     ===========     ===========      ===========      ===========

Weighted average common
      shares outstanding - basic................       4,458,164       4,412,102        4,461,265        4,427,482
                                                     ===========     ===========      ===========      ===========

Earnings per common share - basic
    Income from continuing operations...........     $      0.17     $      0.27      $      0.07      $      0.13
                                                     ===========     ===========      ===========      ===========

    Net income..................................     $      0.17     $      0.27      $      0.07      $      0.13
                                                     ===========     ===========      ===========      ===========

Weighted average common
      shares outstanding - diluted..............       4,664,451       4,527,602        4,669,014        4,574,820
                                                     ===========     ===========      ===========      ===========

Earnings per common share - diluted
    Income from continuing operations...........     $      0.16     $      0.26      $      0.06      $      0.13
                                                     ===========     ===========      ===========      ===========

    Net income                                       $      0.16     $      0.26      $      0.06      $      0.13
                                                     ===========     ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>


              [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                  |

|                   |   |                                                        |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                        |   |
| Date: January 11, 2013 | By:    | /s/ David A. Kriegstein                                |   |
|                   |   | Name: David A. Kriegstein                                   |   |
|                   |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer |   |
|                   |   |                                                        |   |
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2427 

To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film for analog photography. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film for 

analog photography. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INSTANT PRINT FILM FOR ANALOG PHOTOG4 RAPHY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Instant print film of a kind 

used for analog photography 

in mirrored reflex cameras 

for frontal exposure on a negative base (provided for in 

subheading 3701.20.0030) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2427 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A183
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Antonio JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 03-3363.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2004.

Decided May 10, 2004.

Edward J. Rogers, Asst. U. S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*57Antonio Johnson, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Johnson appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that Johnson is not entitled to a sentence reduction based on Amendment 518 to the Sentencing Guidelines. *See*U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a); *Delgado v. United States,*162 F.3d 981, 983 (8th Cir.1998).

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.