alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate, and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         736,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,452,954<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,247,568<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,452,954<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,984,785<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               479,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,504,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,504,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,504,983
<EPS-BASIC>                                    25.29<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include investment
in joint ventures of $2,425,957 and other assets of $39,537.
<F2>Other Stockholders' Equity represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilites of $205,386.
<F4>Total revenue includes rent of $551,241, gains on sales of real estate of
$4,026,422, equity in earnings of joint venture of $147,569 and interest
and other revenues of $259,553.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>


</TABLE>
ex10_29.htm


 Exhibit 10.29 


 





 Party A: Jishuang Sun 


 Party B: Songyuan North East Petroleum Technical Service Co., 


 Party A leased a business building owned by Party A to Party B. Both parties hereby enter into the agreement based on the <Contract Law>. 


 


 1) Building area, location and purpose: 


 


 The building area is around 270 m2, three floors, including three garage rooms with total area 35 m2. The hallway and canteen are totally 55 m2. Offices are on the 2nd and 3rd floors which are 180
m2 with full facilities. 


 


 Building address: 1717 Zhan Jiang Road Qing Nian Avenue Economic and Technological Development Zone, Song Yuan City, Jilin Province. 


 


 Purpose: Office building 


 


 2)           Lease period: 10 years, between July 01 2005 and June 30, 2015. 


 3)           Rent and payment method: 


 Two Prices: 


 No decoration: ¥8000/month, or ¥96000/year. 


 If Party B needs to decorate the building, all the expenses should be entitled to Party B, and Party A can own the decorations after the lease period. ¥36000/year. 


 Party B should pay the rent before Jan 10th every year in cash. 


 Party B should pay the current year rent within 10 days upon execution, and Party A will provide the building to Party B. 


 


 4)           During lease period, Party B should pay all the expenses, such as water, electricity, and heating system. 


 


 5)           Party B should be responsible for the maintenance fee for the interior facilities and Party A should be responsible for the maintenance fee for the building. 


 


 6)           Breach of Contract 


 1.           If Party B is late for the rent, the late fee is 3%% of the half-year rent every day. If one party terminates the contract without any reason, a fine that is 10% of the rest rent of the contract will apply. 


 2.           The party which doesn’t perform the obligation to maintain the building and office should pay the equivalent maintenance fee to another party. 


 


 3.           If Party B changes the building for other purpose, which results in damage to the building, the Party A can withdraw the building and the party who breach the contract should be responsible for the damage fee. 


 7). Dispute Resolution 


 Both parties should negotiate when dispute happens. If the dispute cannot be resolved by negotiation, both parties can file the proceedings at the local courts. 


 




  





  











  






 


 8). Miscellaneous: 


 1. Whether local price is increased or decreased, both parties should use the contract price. 


 2. There are two counterparts for this contract, and each party keeps one copy. 


 3. Contract period is 10 years, and the contract automatically expires after the expiry of the lease. 


 


 Party A: Jishuang Sun 


 Signature: Jishuang Sun 


 


 Party B: Songyuan North East Petroleum Technical Service Co., 


 Signature: Guizhi Ju (Seal) 


 


 Date: June 30th, 2005
# L_2019254EN.01007501.xml

| 3.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 254/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 254/75

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 217/2017 has been withdrawn and therefore left blank.

---
* Pursuant to 5 t h C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 02-10254

_____________________

PEOPLES BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DALE LARSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth

(USDC No. 4:01-CV-900-A)

July 30, 2002

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

After considering the record, briefs, and oral argument in

this case, we hold that this litigation should be stayed pending

arbitration. Although it is clear from the district court’s good

opinion that it carefully considered the merits of this case, we

think that it nonetheless erred by failing to give proper weight to

(1) the interconnected nature of the four contemporaneously

executed agreements at issue and (2) the broad “related to”2

language contained in the arbitration clause of the Conditional

Guaranty. S ee Personal Security & Safety Systems , Inc. v.

Motorola, Inc.

,

__ F.3d

__, 2002 WL 1413702 at *5 (5 th Cir. July 1,

2002) (“In s um, we hold that, where the parties include a broad

arbitration provision in an agreement t hat is ‘essential’ to the

overall transaction, we will presume that they intended the clause

to reach all aspects of the transaction

–- including those aspects

governed by other contemporaneously e xecuted agreements that are

part of the same transaction.”); Neal v. Hardee’s Food Sys., Inc.

,

918 F.2d 34, 38 (5th Cir. 1990) (“We hold that when the parties

included a broad ar bitration clause in the essential License

Agreements covering ‘any and all disputes,’ they intended the

clause to reach all aspects of the parties’ relationship including

the purchase of the physical properties.”).

The fact that Larson was not a signatory on each of the four

agreements does not distinguish this case from Neal a nd P ersonal

Security

. With an eye towards the Larson Group’s primary liability

for the debt under the Security and Reimb ursement Agreement,

Peoples Benefit deliberatel y chose to limit Larson’s individual

liability in the Conditional Guaranty. The Conditional Guaranty

specifically directs that the two agreements should be interpreted

together. Both contracts contain a broad arbitration provision.

The parties negotiated the Conditional Guaranty as part of their

overall goal to hold Larson Group liable broadly but limit Larson’s

individual liability to cases of criminal condu ct or breaches of3

the Emplo yment Agreement. As a consequence, claims that Larson

fraudulently induced Peoples Benefit to participate in this

transaction should be arbitrated.

We therefore reverse the dist rict court and remand for the

entry of a stay pending arbitration.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Tarrus H. KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2139

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed September 26, 2017 Rehearing Denied November 16, 2017

Tarrus H. Kelly, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See*, *e.g.*, *Payne v. Jones*, 183 So.3d 1130 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ; *Clara P. Diamond, Inc. v. Tam-Bay Realty, Inc.*, 462 So.2d 1168, 1169-70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Dean Wicker, the Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer of Newsearch, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY,
that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
          June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 28th day of October, 2004.


                                            By:  /s/  Dean Wicker
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Dean Wicker,
                                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Newsearch, Inc. and will be retained by Newsearch, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2521 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Mandipropamid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Mandipropamid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MANDIPROPAMID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.07 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Mandipropamid) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2521 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document

Exhibit 10.219

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
DEFERRED STOCK PLAN
 FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS
Effective as of July 29, 2015
WHEREAS, Erie Indemnity Company (the “Company”) maintains the Erie Indemnity Company Deferred Stock Plan For Outside Directors (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, Article Four of the Basic Plan Document of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may amend or terminate the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend Article Four of the Basic Plan Document of the Plan to provide that the Executive Compensation and Development Committee of the Board may amend or terminate the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the aforementioned amendment at its meeting on October 26, 2021 and reflected in the minutes thereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends Article Four of the Plan to replace the reference to “Board” with a reference to “Committee”, effective as of October 26, 2021.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Third Amendment to be executed this 21st day of December 2021.


									
			ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
			
	ATTEST:		
			
	/s/ Brian W. Bolash		By: /s/ Gregory J. Gutting

			Title: Executive Vice President & CFO
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated September 30, 2011, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-176492) of Smart Trust,
Dynamic Sector Income Trust (2011 Series J).


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


September 30, 2011
**02 NCAC 09L .1807 SPECIFIC INFORMATION**  **ABOUT APPLICATIONS**

(a) Concerning application information requirements contained in 40 CFR Sections 170.122 and 170.222 the following is also required to be completed by the agricultural employer: (1) In addition to the requirements of S ections 170.122(c)(3), and 170.222(c)(3), the specific time of day when each pesticide application was com pleted must be recorded immediately upon completion of the application. Each day of the application shall be recorded as a separate record. (2) After the application information referenced in (a)(1) of this Rule and the other information in Sections 170.122(c) and 170.222(c) has been displayed for the required period of time in Section 170.122 (b) and 170.222(b), the agricultural em ployer shall maintain the information for a period of two years from the specific time of day when each pesticide application wa s com pleted. Such information shall be available for inspection and copying by the Board or its agents upon their request. (b) In addition to information contained in Section 170.224(b), the handler em ployer must make the agricultural

owner aware of the specific time of day when each pesticide application wa s com pleted. The agricultural em p loyer shall display the information immediately and shall make it part of the record required to be maintained in Paragraph (a)(1) and (2) of this Rule.

History Note: Authority G.S. 143

- 466(a);

Eff. May 1, 2009.
Omar BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1914

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Official Journal L 47/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.047.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 47 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5718 February 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.047.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 47

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5718 February 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 133/2014 of 31 January 2014 amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress as regards emission limits, Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 133/2014 of 31 January 2014 amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress as regards emission limits, Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
AFS-13-035-E

December 5, 2012

 Exemption No. 8827C

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-19374

Mr. Colin Fender

Flight Test Engineering

The Boeing Company

P.O. Box 3707 M/C 17-PM

Seattle, WA 98124-2207

Dear Mr. Fender:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8827, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated September 7, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of The Boeing Company (Boeing) for an extension of Exemption No. 8827, as 

amended. That exemption from § 91.529(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations permits 

flight engineers, employed by Boeing, to serve as flight engineers on B-707 and B-747 aircraft 

if they have logged a minimum of 20 hours in lieu of the required 50 hours of flight time as 

flight engineers on the particular type aircraft within the preceding 12 months, provided the 

combined flight time in any B-707 or B-747 aircraft, or Level B, C, or D simulator that 

represents any B-707 or B-747 aircraft, is at least 100 hours in the preceding 12 calendar 

months.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.
2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Boeing.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8827, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, 

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8827, as amended, to 

January 31, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards

 Service
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Masakazu Kurushima, in my capacity as the President and Chief Executive Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending March 31, 2007, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on May 2, 2007 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in
such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.

Dated: May 2, 2007



By:

/s/ MASAKAZU KURUSHIMAMasakazu KurushimaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Roy CASTLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5180

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gustavo RISQUEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Exhibit 10.2

 

September 28, 2011

 

Larry Potts

Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer & Director Corporate Security

Scientific Games Corporation

750 Lexington Avenue, 25th Floor

New York, New York

 

Dear Larry:

 

This letter will confirm certain modifications to your Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (executed August 2, 2006), as amended by letter agreement October 2, 2008 and December 30, 2008 (collectively “Agreement”).

 

With regard to Section 1 of your Agreement, the term will be extended from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013.

 

In addition, this letter will confirm that effective November 1, 2011, you will no longer be assigned to the New York office as a primary place of employment.  Rather, your primary place of assignment will be Leesburg Virginia.  No other changes in your Agreement are anticipated at this time.  If these changes are agreeable, please sign an acknowledgement copy and return to me.

 

Scientific Games Corporation

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   Jack Sarno
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Jack   Sarno
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Deputy   General Counsel and Assistant Secretary
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

 

Acknowledged this 28th day of September, 2011

 

 

	
/s/   Larry Potts
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Larry   Potts
Demetrius Dwayne BROOKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-405

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a Florida corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Michael DavisMichael Davis

Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2010