alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE NAVAJO NATION 

Janet McCabe 

Acting Assistant Adminisu-ator 

Office of Air and Radiation 

October 26, 2015 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

EPA Docket Center (EPAiDC) 

Mail Code 2822IT 

Attn: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0l99 

1200 PelUlsylvania Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Ru SELL BEGAYE 

JONATHAN EZ 

RE: Request for Extension of tbe Comment Period Related to tbe Federal Plan 

Requirements for Greenbouse Gas Emissions From Electric Generating 

Units Constructed on or Before January 8, 2014; Model Trading Rules; 

Amendments to Framework Regulations IEPA-HQ-OAR-2015-01991 

Dear Ms. McCabe: 

On October 23 , 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") 

publisbed its Federal Plan Requirements for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Electric 

Generating Units Constructed on or Before January 8, 20 14; Model Trading Rules; Amendments 

to Framework Regulations ("Drat! Federal Plan"). 80 Fed.Reg. 64966. The Draft Federal Plan 

is subject to a ninety (90) day comment period, with comments due no later than January 21, 

2016. However, the Navajo Nation respectfully requests that the comment period be extended an 

additional sixty (60) days. As will be described below, the Nation believes that this extension 

will ensure a reasonable period fo r public participation consistent with Clean Air Act § 307(h). 

Among other things, USEPA is proposing in the Draft Federal Plan to find it necessary or 

appropriate to establish a federal plan for each of the three areas of Indian country that have 

affected Electric Generating Units ("EGUs") located on their lands. 80 Fed.Reg. 65033. The 

Navajo Nation is one of three tribes that has EGUs located on its lands. A tribe witb affected 

EGUs located on its lands has the opportunity, but not the obligation, to develop a tribal 

implementation plan ("TIP"). If for whatever reason the Nation does not develop a TIP that is 

approved by USEPA, USEPA will develop a federal plan, assuming USEPA finalizes its 

"necessary or appropriate" finding. Therefore, the Nation has a very important interest in 

submining meaningful comments on the Draft Federal Plan. The ation does not believe the 

current 90 day comment period is adequate to develop its comments, especially given the fact 

that the comment period encompasses the Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's holidays. 

The Nation is therefore requesting that the conunent period be extended 60 days, or whatever 

extension USEPA deems reasonable. 
Letter to Janet McCabe 

October 26, 2015 

Page 2 of2 

If you have any questions. please contact April Quinn, Attorney, avaJo Nation 

Department of Justice at aguinnfa' nndoj.org or (928) 871-6347. 

Sincerely, 

cc: William Niebling. Senior Advisor, Congressional & Lnt' l Affairs, OAR, USEPA 

Toni Jones, Fuels & Incineration Group. Sector Policies & Programs Division, USEPA 

Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Admin.istrator, USEPA Region 9 

Amy Ziempfer, Associate Director, Air Division, USEPA Region 9
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2570 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2570

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics' work gloves.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics' work gloves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MECHANICS' WORK GLOVES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking heading 9902.14.04; and
            (2) by inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
        heading:

``     9902.14.04        Mechanics' work     Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          gloves, valued                                                    12/31/2015
                          over $5.58 per
                          pair but not over
                          $7.22 per pair
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          6216.00.58)......

    (b) Amendment to U.S. Note.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 is amended 
by striking the first U.S. Note 18 to such subchapter and inserting 
after U.S. Note 19 the following new U.S. Note:
    ``20. For purposes of heading 9902.14.04, the term `mechanics' work 
gloves' means gloves having the following characteristics: imitation 
leather palms and fingers with fourchettes; backs comprising either one 
layer of synthetic knitted fabric or three layers with the outer layer 
of synthetic knitted fabric, the center layer of foam and the inner 
layer of tricot fabric.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of Louisiana IN the INTEREST OF J.S.

NO. 2018-CJ-0375

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

Denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7170

JOHNNIE R. SIMMONS, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DALE MORENO, Doctor/Medical Supervisor; MRS. HODGE, Nurse (Practitioner) Charge , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T. S. Ellis , III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 00520

- TSE

- JFA )

Submitted : December 16, 2021 Decided: December 20, 2021

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Johnnie R. Simmons, Jr ., Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: Johnnie R. Simmons, Jr. , appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on Simmons’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging deliberate
indifference to a serious medical need. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. See Martin v. Duf f

y , 977 F.3d 294, 298 (4th Cir. 2020) (stating standard of review). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1  CEO Certification

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the quarterly report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom L. Kirchner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ T. L. KIRCHNER

Tom L. Kirchner                                                                        
Chief Executive Officer                                                               
Date: May 11, 2011



This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Annual Report and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing..



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0728

GBSB HOLDING, LLC, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

v. 

 

FLATHEAD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY 

COMMISSIONERS AND FLATHEAD COUNTY, M

ONTANA; WHITEFISH VILLAGE, LLC; 

WILLIAM F. OSWALD AND JULIANA M. OSWALD,

Co-Trustees of the Oswald Family Trust dated May 23, 

2016; SHAWN PATRICK JAMES AND KRISTIN 

PATRICIA BELL; WHITEFISH HILLS VILLAGE 

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, NC.; 

and JOHN DOES 1 AND 2, 

Defendants and Appellees.

Defendants/Appellants.

Pursuant to the authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is

granted an extension of time up to and including April 17, 2024, to prepare,

file and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

ELETORNICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 14 2024

03/14/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0728
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**EXCHANGE ACTRULES 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBrooktrout, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert C. Leahy, Vice President of Finance and Operations of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|    Date: | August 9, 2005 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT C. LEAHY                             |
|-------------------------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                |   | Robert C. Leahy                                 |
|                    |                |   | *Vice President of  Finance and Operations*     |
|                    |                |   | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2591 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2591

   To suspend temporarily the duty on ultraviolet lamps filled with 
                             deuterium gas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on ultraviolet lamps filled with 
                             deuterium gas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS FILLED WITH DEUTERIUM GAS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Ultraviolet lamps   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          filled with                                                       12/31/2015
                          deuterium gas
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8539.49.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Gerald G. Barton, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Landmark Land Company, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: August 12, 2005 /s/ GERALD G. BARTON   Gerald G. Barton   President and Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 347/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 347 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5920 December 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 347

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5920 December 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2016/2247 of the European Central Bank of 3 November 2016 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB/2016/35) | 1 |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2016/2248 of the European Central Bank of 3 November 2016 on the allocation of monetary income of the national central banks of Member States whose currency is the euro (ECB/2016/36) | 26 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | * | Guideline (EU) 2016/2249 of the European Central Bank of 3 November 2016 on the legal framework for accounting and financial reporting in the European System of Central Banks (ECB/2016/34) | 37 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2016/2247 of the European Central Bank of 3 November 2016 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB/2016/35)

1

*

Decision (EU) 2016/2248 of the European Central Bank of 3 November 2016 on the allocation of monetary income of the national central banks of Member States whose currency is the euro (ECB/2016/36)

26

GUIDELINES

*

Guideline (EU) 2016/2249 of the European Central Bank of 3 November 2016 on the legal framework for accounting and financial reporting in the European System of Central Banks (ECB/2016/34)

37

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Health Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul H. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
S. D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1907

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

OCTOBER 03, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.
STATE EX REL. Richard Lynn LONG, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2071

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RICHLAND**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 4, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135680 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135680 

 COA: 282164 

Kent CC: 07-002709-FC 

JAVIER ALONSO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0528 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 4, 2008 

 Clerk
Joshua SCHOONOVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE OF DELAWARE 


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION



 


The corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware does hereby certify:


 


FIRST: That
at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Amarantus BioSciences, Inc. resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed
amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting
of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:


 


RESOLVED that Article IV, Section A of the Corporation’s Certificate
of Incorporation be amended to change total number of authorized shares of Common Stock of the Corporation to 250,000,000 shares.
As amended, Articled IV, Section A shall read as follows:


 


A.CLASSES OF STOCK


 


The Corporation is authorized to issue
two classes of stock to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock.” The total number
of shares which the Corporation is authorized to issue is 260,000,000 shares. 250,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock, each having
a par value of $0.001. 10,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, each having a par value of $0.001.


 


SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to
resolution of its Board of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held upon notice
in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of
shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.


 


THIRD: That said amendment was duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation
has caused this certificate to be signed this 7th day of October, 2011.


 


 


/s/ Martin D. Cleary


Martin D. Cleary


President and CEO
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSEPH SCHEIGERT
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2821

[ October 29, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara Anne McCarthy , Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 6029

- CF

- 10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy,

Assistant Attorne y General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
B.B., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2483

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.