alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 207/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.207.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 207 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5413 July 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.207.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 207

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5413 July 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 207/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2011/C 207/2 | List of members of the European Statistical Advisory Committee (ESAC) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 207/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2011/C 207/2

List of members of the European Statistical Advisory Committee (ESAC)

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 207/3 | State aid — Romania — State aid SA.30931 — 11/C (ex N 185/10) — Development of airport infrastructure scheme — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU (
  1
  ) | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2011/C 207/3

State aid — Romania — State aid SA.30931 — 11/C (ex N 185/10) — Development of airport infrastructure scheme — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3175-3176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the NHLBI Mentored 
Patient-Oriented Research Review Committee.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. 
The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 3176]]


    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Review Committee.
    Date: February 22-23, 2018.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Stephanie Johnson Webb, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-827-7992, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f6f1e0f5ede4ebece0abf2e0e7e7c5ebecedabe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="03707766736b626d6a662d74666161436d6a6b2d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 17, 2018.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-01079 Filed 1-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.J., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.J., A MINOR :

:

:

:

: No. 144 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         559,179
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               559,179
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 623,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,567
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,479,755)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   623,479
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               567,733
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               545,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,183
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,183
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Errol O. BOOTHE, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3273

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 7, 2018]

Catherine A. Riggins, Miami, for appellant.

Chase A. Berger of Berger Firm, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The Borrower appeals from a September 19, 2017 order denying his September 5, 2017 "Emergency Motion to Vacate Sale Entered on September 28, 2016, Vacate Certificate of Title and to Stay and Vacate Writ of Possession."

The trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order because the borrower's appeal (4D17-2697) from an earlier motion to vacate writ of possession was still pending. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(f). We therefore do not reach the merits of this appeal and instead quash the September 19 order as void. *See**Rivas v. Bank of New York Mellon* , 233 So.3d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (quashing order denying motion to vacate foreclosure judgment as void without reaching merits of the order where the order was entered while appeal from foreclosure judgment was pending). In so doing we express no comment on the merits of the court's denial of the September 5 motion.

In light of our disposition, we deny the Bank's motion to dismiss appeal as moot.

Appellant is reminded that this court has already affirmed the trial court's order denying appellant's motion to vacate the sale in case number 4D16-4313.

*Order quashed.*

Levine, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7458

BEVERLY R. MANGUM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District 

Judge. (7:11-cv-00205-SGW)

Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beverly Ricardo Mangum, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, 

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Beverly Ricardo Mangum seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Mangum has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Eduard
      Jaeger, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Annual Report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the
      year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ironclad
      Performance Wear Corporation.




Dated:
      March 31, 2008




/s/
              Eduard JaegerEduard
                Jaeger,President
                and Chief Executive Officer




This
      certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject
      to
      the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace. Such certification shall
      not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
      Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
      Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2539 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2539

     To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Basic Violet 11.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Basic Violet 11.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.24 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Basic Violet 11) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# A ALBEMARLE * P
. 1 RECEIVE D Albemarl eCorporatio

n 

### OPP T CBI C 45 1 FloridaStreet

Telephone : 225-388-801 1 Bato nRouge , Louisian a70801-176

5 Facsimile : 225-388-768 6 201 3 HA R" 8 A H10 * 3* / February19 , 201 3 Vi a Emai l Documen tContro l Offic e (7407M ) Offic e o fPollutio n Preventio n an d Toxic s (OPPT ) Environmenta l Protectio n Agency' EP AEas tRoo m 120 1 Constitutio n Ave. , N.W
. Washington , D C 20004-330 2 11 1 11 1 Ni l II I 11 1 4 0 1 3 0 Q 0 0 0 "2" Attn : TSC ASectio n 4 RE : Benzenediamine , ar , ar-diethyl-ar-methyl- , CAS#68479-98- 1 I n complianc e wit h th e fina l rule , "Testin g o fCertai n Hig h Productio n Volum e Chemical ; Secon d Grou p o fChemicals" , 76FR1067 , January17 , 2011 , Albemarl e Corporatio n an d Lonz a submi tthi s Reques tfo rModificatio n o fTes t Standard s fo r"Benzenediamine , ar , ar-diethyl-ar-methyl-" , CAS#68479-98-1
. Fo ren d poin tF 1 - Mammalia n Toxicity : Repeate d Dose , Reproductive/Developmenta l Screen , Albemarl e an d Lonz a hav e submitte d numerou s repeate d dos e studies
. Wit h thos e submittal s Albemarl e an d Lonz a requeste d derogatio n o fthi s testin g requirement
. EP Aagree d tha tth e repeate d dos e tes twoul d n o longe rb e necessary . Th e prenata l developmenta l toxicit y test , however , woul d stil l b e required
. Sinc e tha tdecision , ther e hav e bee n severa l bac k

an d fort h submission s o n th e methodolog yfo rconductin g firs tth e preliminaryrang e findin g stud yan d the n th e fina l study
. Th e rang e findin g stud y i s complet e an d th e fina l protoco l ha s bee n reviewe d b yEPA
. EP Aforwarde d comment s o n th e definitiv e tes tprotoco l t o Albemarl e o n January31 , 2013
. Thos e comment s ar e unde radvisemen tb yth e Europea n consortiu m responsibl e fo rthi s chemica l unde rREAC H i n th e EU
. Thi s tes ti s bein g conducte d t o satisfy thi s en d poin tfo rbot h th e tes trul e reference d abov e an d REAC H registratio n fo r th e substance
. Th e definitiv e prenata l developmenta l toxicit ytes ti s schedule d t o begi n o n Marc h 25 , 201 3 assumin g al l comment s fro m EP Ao n th e protoco l ca n b e resolve d within th e consortium
. Afina l reportfo rth e definitiv e tes ti s expecte d b y Decembe r31 , 2013
. Thu s Albemarl e an d Lonz a reques ta n extensio n o fth e tim e fo rsubmitta l ofth e fina l repor tunti l Decembe r31 , 2013
. 

# !ao ON smiNoop . 2

I fyo u hav e an yquestion s abou tou rreques to rwoul d lik e t o discus s alternative s t o ou rrequeste d modification , pleas e cal l m e at225-388-7776
.

Ki m Boudreau x* Sr
. Advisor , RegulatoryAffair s cc : Joh n Shaeffe r Chemica l Contro l Divisio n (7405M ) Offic e o fPollutio n Preventio n an d Toxic s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 120 1 Constitutio n Ave. , N.W
. Washington , D C 20004-330 2p . 3
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17474-17475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RD09-6-000]


North American Electric Reliability Corporation; Notice of Filing

April 8, 2009.
    Take notice that on March 5, 2009, pursuant to section 215(d)(1) of 
the Federal Power Act and part 39.5 of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission's Regulations, The North American Electric Reliability 
Corporation (NERC) filed a petition seeking approval for 
interpretations of Requirement R11 in its Commission-approved NERC 
Reliability Standard, TOP-002-2--Normal Operations Planning, designated 
as TOP-002-2a.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as

[[Page 17475]]

appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or 
before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not 
necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other 
than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#195f5c4b5a56777570777c4a6c6969766b6d597f7c6b7a377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f090a1d0c00212326212a1c3a3f3f203d3b0f292a3d2c61282039">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 8, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-8563 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officer of Mechel OAO (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

(i)            the accompanyingAnnual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(ii)        theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: July 2, 2007 | /s/ IGOR V. ZYUZIN         |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    | Igor V. Zyuzin             |
|                    | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
STATE EX REL. James K. DAVIS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-2265

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied. Moot. See also State v. Davis, 16-2128 (La. __/__/18), --- So.3d ----.
Kendall MAJOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATIONS
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, David G. Mazzella, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably like to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of the internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting,which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 12, 2004 By:  /s/ David G. Mazzella   David G. Mazzella   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
22