alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.6 – CERTIFICATION OF CFO

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jon Correio, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Electronic SystemsTechnology Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:- designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information    relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us    by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly    report is being prepared;  
- evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures    as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the    "Evaluation Date"); and  
- presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the    disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditor’s and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):- all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could    adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report    financial data and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors any material    weaknesses in internal controls; and  
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have    a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal control subsequent to the date ofour most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: November 12, 2003/s/ JON CORREIOJon Correio Chief Financial Officer
Frederick Lamar HARRIS, Danny Chadwick, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. Wayne GARNER, Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections, A.G. Thomas, Director of Facilities Division of the Georgia Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 98-8899. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 6, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia (No. 5:97-CV-79-4); Hugh Lawson, Judge. (Opinion September 30, 1999, 190 F.3d 1279, 11th Cir., 1999) Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in ac tive service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be rehear d by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Richard Daniel FALCON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-507

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 25, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         5,126
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               30,980
<PP&E>                                         1,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,616,337
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,380,357
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,995,599)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,480
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               275,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (275,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (275,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (275,422)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)
        


</TABLE>
10/21/201 0 11:4 0 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 02/0 2 

# o Northwes t Moutitai n Regio n Colorado , Iddio , Montan

a Oregon, Utah , Washingto

n Wyomin g U.S

. Departmen

t O f Transportatio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l Octobe r 21,201 0 Vi aFa x an dRegula r Mai l Th e Honorabl e Richar

dGoodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Office o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S

. Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E , Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , RoomEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administration , Office o f Hearin g U.S

. Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Washington , D.C

. 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docket

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbe r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit

e 2W100 0 Re : Empir e Airlines , DO T Docke t CP10>fM0007 FAA Cas e No

. 20O9NM7006 5 160 1 Lin dAvenu e S.W

. Renton , Washington 9805 7 Tel : (425)227-184 7 Fax:(425)227-100 7 kyle.lomazow@faa.go v

1 3

r o C O

Dea r Judg e Goodwin : A s indicate di n th e cove

r letter t o our Complain t date dSeptembe

r 14,2010 , w e respectfully reques t tha t venu e b e hel di n Seattle , Washingto n a s ou r witnesse s an devidenc e are locate d i n Seattle , Washington

. Sincerely ,
Kyl e E

. Lomazo w FA A Attorne y
cc : Cynthi aChandler-Snell Senior Attorney-Regulator

y Affair s Federa l ETqrcs s Corporation 320 Hack s Cros s Roa

d Buildin g B , 3" * Floo r Memphis , T

N 3812 5
----

Action brought on 14 July 2005 against the Commission of the European Communities by Christos Michail

(Case T-284/05)

(2005/C 229/71)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 14 July 2005 by Christos Michail, resident in Brussels, Belgium, represented by Charalambos Meidanis, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, who is a Commission official, seeks the annulment of his career development report for the period from 1.4.2003 to 31.12.2003 and an order that financial reparation be made for the non-material damage which he claims to have suffered. He claims in support of his application that the report in question did not contain a description of his post, since, moreover, as he claims, during the period in question he simply did not occupy any post. He also claims that the report in question did not even contain a description of his individual objective goals to be attained and did not contain any reasoning for the points he was given; it was drawn up by a body and person having no competence to do so; it was not drawn up on the basis of his actual work but was based on the assessments of an earlier staff report. In the light of all the foregoing the applicant claims that there was infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations of Officials and all the implementing provisions, infringement of Article 12a of those Staff Regulations, which refers to psychological harassment, manifest error of assessment as regards the facts, non-existent or otherwise insufficient reasons for the acts challenged, misuse of powers on the part of the Commission and infringement of the principle of fair and equal treatment of staff and the principle of sound administration.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,188,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,319,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,467,730<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  90,083,393<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,467,730<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,353,419<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,817,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,535,844
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,535,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,535,844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.81<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net investments
in real estate of $35,237,542, real estate held for sale of $53,434,820, 
investment in joint venture of $2,659,208, net deferred leasing commissions
of $2,166,208 and other assets of $462,327.
<F2>Other Stockholders' Equity represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities of
$811,458, minority interest in joint venture of $8,378,496, and other
liabilities of $194,383.
<F4>Total revenue includes rent of $4,240,916, equity in earnings of joint
venture of $62,900, and interest and other revenues of $49,603.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 906CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom L.Kirchner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jon Correio, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 
/s/ TOM L KIRCHNER/s/ JON CORREIOTom L. KirchnerJon Correio
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial OfficerDate: 05/07/2004Date: 05/07/2004
| **CERTIFICATE OF OFFICER****OF****LENNAR PARTNERS, INC.********Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 20, 2004, (the "Agreement"),****by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as****Depositor, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer,****Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., as Trustee, LaSalle Bank N.A., as Paying Agent and****Lennar Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer****(JPMCC 2004-LN2)******The undersigned, Susan K Chapman, as Vice President of LENNAR PARTNERS, INC., a Florida Corporation (the "Company"), in accordance with Section 3.13 of the Agreement, does hereby certify on behalf of the Company that (i) a review of the activities of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2004 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects and there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation throughout such period ended December 31, 2004; (iii) the Company has received no notice regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of the Lower-Tier REMIC and Upper-Tier REMIC as a REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certificate as of the 1st day of March, 2005. /s/ Susan K. Chapman Susan K. Chapman Vice President Lennar Partners, Inc. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Catherine A. BACKOS, as Trustee of the Declaration of Trust of Catherine A. Backos Dated September 22, 2005, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., as Trustee FOR the HOLDERS OF the MANA 2007-AF1 TRUST, and Quail West Foundation, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1 -- Servicer's Annual Statement of Compliance


						100 Wood Hollow Drive
						Novato, CA 94945


					[GreenPoint Mortgage logo]


March 15, 2005


   RE:	GreenPoint Home Equity Loan Trust (Series 2004-4);
        Annual Statement as to Comp1iance by the Servicer

Ladies and Gentlemen:

	Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and
Section 4(f) of the Underwriting Agreement with respect to the above-referenced
offering, the undersigned officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
(as "Servicer") hereby certifies as to the following (capitalized terms have the
meanings used in the Sale and Servicing Agreement):

    1.	a review of the activities of the Servicer and its performance under the
        Sale and Servicing Agreement during the preceding fiscal year since the
        inception of the trust has been made under the direct supervision of the
        undersigned officer; and

    2.	to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such review,
        the Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the
        Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the applicable period, and there
        has been no known default in the fulfillment of the Servicer's material
        obligations throughout such period, except in connection with the
	servicing of the Mortgage Loans by the Servicer, in certain
	circumstances the mortgage interest rate changes on certain Mortgage
	Loans were not adjusted at the appropriate date in accordance with the
	Mortgagor's loan documents.  This resulted in the Mortgagor being
	overcharged for the period from the interest rate change until the
	correct effective date, which was the first day of the following month.
	As a result, more interest was collected for distribution in certain
	Collection Periods than would otherwise be the case.  There was no
	impact, however, on the calculation of amounts due and payable on the
	Notes or on the amounts paid on the Notes.  The number of Mortgage
	Loans not adjusted at the appropriate date was 3,524, with a total
	overcharge of approximately $75,952.93.  No reimbursement of these
	overcharges which were paid to the Trust Fund will be requested by the
	Servicer.  This error was identified by Management and the systematic
	issue that caused the incorrect calculation of interest was resolved
	prior to the issuance of this letter.  All Mortgagors that were
	overcharged will be refunded any excess interest paid.

						Very truly yours

						GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
						FUNDING, INC.,
						as Servicer

						/S/ Nathan Hieter
						Name:	Nathan Hieter
						Title:	Senior Vice President
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, in Trust FOR REGISTERED HOLDERS OF LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-6 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-6, Appellant, v. James M. MILLER, Angela M. Miller a/k/a Angela Marie Miller a/k/a Angela Marie Hayes, All American Management, Fairwinds Credit Union, State of Florida, Seminole County, Florida, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-785

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018 Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 12, 2018

Nicholas S Agnello, Courtney Oakes and Matthew Mitchell, of Burr & Forman LLP, Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Roger A Kelly, of Rush, Marshall, Jones and Kelly, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, James M. Miller.

No Appearance for other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company ("the Bank") appeals an order granting final summary judgment in favor of James and Angela Miller and dismissing its complaint based on the statute of limitations. We reverse.

In May 2013, the Bank filed a foreclosure complaint against the Millers, alleging that the Millers defaulted on their February 1, 2007 mortgage payment and all subsequent payments. The Millers successfully moved for summary judgment, arguing that the statute of limitations barred the Bank's claim based on the default date alleged in the complaint. *See* § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing five-year statute of limitations period for foreclosure actions).

The trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations. The Bank's complaint was not time-barred because the Bank alleged a continuous state of default that encompassed payments within the five years preceding the filing of the complaint. *See**Velden v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC*, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D147, --- So.3d ---- (Fla. 5th DCA Jan. 12, 2018) ; *Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Stallbaum*, 230 So.3d 1271, 1271 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ; *U.S. Bank N.A. v. Diamond*, 228 So.3d 177, 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ; *Klebanoff v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon*, 228 So.3d 167, 168 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Accordingly, we reverse the entry of final summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Sterling Drilling Fund 1984-2's 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,345
<PP&E>                                       5,628,217
<DEPRECIATION>                              (5,445,468)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,338<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,094
<SALES>                                         35,612<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,612
<CGS>                                           25,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other -se includes total partners' equity.
<F2>Sales included $99 of interest income.
<F3>the limited partnership income was divided by total number of limited
partnership units of 6,448.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>