alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT
RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report (report) on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Restaurant
Properties II;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2007
    

/s/ Shirlene LopezShirlene LopezPresident
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A,Amendment No. 2, of Seitel, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert D. Monson, Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: June 9, 2004/s/    ROBERT D. MONSON        **Robert D. Monson****Principal Financial Officer**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

OLGA SEGREAVES,

Respondent

v.

ROSS SEGREAVES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 240 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of December, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                              |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                              |   |
|   |   | /s/      Mark      D. Roberson                    |   |
|   |   | Mark      D. RobersonChief      Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                                              |   |
|   |   |                                              |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 707

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 700 to 789, revised as of July 1, 2008, on page 29, in § 707.60, the first sentence of the introductory text of paragraph (c)(2) is corrected to read as follows:

§ 707.60

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(2) No notice of export is required for the export of a chemical substance or mixture that is a known or potential human carcinogen where such chemical substance or mixture is present in a concentration of less than 0.1% (by weight or volume). * * *

* * * * *

[FR Doc. E9-8354 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Tyheem BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
J.J., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2113

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Dennis Earl BUSHEY v. Tracy Melissa BUSHEY

2151014

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
H. Res. 871 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 15, 2023. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Amo (to rank 

immediately after Mr. Crow). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-8000

In Re: EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR., Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 2:05-cv-00089-REM) Submitted: March 22, 2007 Decided: March 29, 2007 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and grant Graham’s motion to amend his petition, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I,
Larry F. Vance, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Earth Search Sciences,
Inc.;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
      April 22, 2008
            /s/
      Larry F. VanceLarry F. VanceChief Executive
      Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 10, 2022

No. 04-20-00089-CV

VERMILLION FC, LP,

Appellant

v.

1776 ENERGY PARTNERS,

Appellee

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-10-13812-ZCV

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Vermillion FC, LP filed a motion for correction of the judgment and 

memorandum opinion nunc pro tunc to include an omitted party on December 3, 2021. Appellee 

1776 Partners, LLC filed a response on December 13, 2021, and Appellant filed a reply on 

December 29, 2021. Appellant’s motion is DENIED. See Cohen v. Midtown Mgmt. Dist., 490 

S.W.3d 624 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016, no pet.); LaGoye v. Victoria Wood Condo. 

Ass’n, 112 S.W.3d 777, 784 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.).

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of January, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
# Official Journal L 302/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.302.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 302 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5217 November 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.302.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 302

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5217 November 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies (1) | 1 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (1) | 32 |
| | * | Directive 2009/111/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 amending Directives 2006/48/EC, 2006/49/EC and 2007/64/EC as regards banks affiliated to central institutions, certain own funds items, large exposures, supervisory arrangements, and crisis management (1) | 97 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies (1)

1

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (1)

32

*

Directive 2009/111/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 amending Directives 2006/48/EC, 2006/49/EC and 2007/64/EC as regards banks affiliated to central institutions, certain own funds items, large exposures, supervisory arrangements, and crisis management (1)

97

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
r

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19-0273 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. RANDY S.LAEDEKE,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# FILED APR 2 1 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Randy S. Laedeke petitions this Court for rehearing of a March 24, 2020 Order denying his motion for stay ofexecution and stay ofproceedings pending the outcome of his appeal. The State ofMontana has filed a response in opposition. Laedeke asserts that this Court erred in its decision because his situation meets all three criteria forrehearing,pursuantto M.R.App.P.20(1). Laedeke argues that this Court should "grant a supersedeas" to avoid serious injury,pursuant to a general rule oflaw in Nepstad v. East Chicago OilAssn.,96 Mont. 183,29 P.2d 643 (1934). Laedeke contends that his request for a stay is warranted because he may be damaged irreparably by complying with the Yellowstone County District Court's Order "to liquidate his remaining five head ofhorses for pennies on the dollar ofthe value[d"when this Court could reverse the court's decision on appeal. The State maintains that Laedeke is not entitled to a stay or a rehearing. The State contends that Laedeke advances arguments now similar to those he made in his previous motion. The State argues that Laedeke does not clearly demonstrate exceptional circumstances;thathe does notraise any new material facts;and thathe has not shown that this Court overlooked any material fact or question. M.R.App.P. 22(1)(d), 22(1)(a)(i), and 22(1)(a)(ii). 04/21/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0273

### Upon review, we agree with the State that Laedeke has not demonstrated any

exceptional circumstances to warrant rehearing. M.R.App.P. 20(1)(d). We reiterate that Laedeke's request for a stay is untimely. The District entered its judgment on revocation on April 5, 2019. Laedeke waited nearly eleven months to seek a stay, filing his motion the day before another scheduled revocation hearing. The court denied his motion as untimely. Laedeke has not shown good cause for relieffrom that order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Laedeke's Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to Randy S. Laedeke personally. DATED this 7,
—

day ofApril, 2020.
ChiefJustice

2 

### L

A . 11

5 1 A 4 4 1 1—— Justices
Kathleen A. STRAUB and Michael Straub, Appellants, v. CADENCE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2568

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Andre Terron LOUIS, #S25890, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Thomas CASIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Janice Lynn TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1052

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly filing of American Resource Technologies, Inc.,
a Kansas corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, M. H. McIlvain, Executive Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 25, 2007

By:/s/ M. H. McIlvain
---------------------
M. H. McIlvain
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ricardo Bernardes,

1. I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and we have:

(a) design such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary is, made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 2, 2007



By:

/s/ RICARDO BERNARDESRicardo BernardesExecutive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Denonta THADISON a/k/a Demonta Demarcus Thadison

NO. 2017-K-1323

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied*