alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.3

                        Independent Accountant's Report

Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)
One Wachovia Center
301 South College Street, DC-7
Charlotte, NC 28288

U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)
Corporate Trust Department
100 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005


Re:  STRATS Trust For Morgan Stanley Securities Series 2004-11 (the "Trust")
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (the
"Depositor") and U.S. Bank National Association, (the "Trustee" and Together
with the Depositor, the "Management") that the Depositor and the Trustee have
complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust
Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series
supplement dated as of August 31, 2004 (together, the "Trust Agreement"), in
respect of the STRATS Trust For Morgan Stanley Securities Series 2004-11 (the
"Trust"), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by
the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Annual Report"). Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust
Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management's
assertions based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor's and the
Trustee's compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other
procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material
respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual
Report and Management's assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly
stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Aston Bell, CPA
New York, New York
March 22, 2005
STATE of Louisiana v. Field CALHOUN

NO. 2017-KO-1081

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 1127 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 035 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of COMC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
        10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, I, Marc Dell'Immagine, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
        of the
        Company, certify, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations
                  of the Company.
  Date: August
                24, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Marc
                Dell'ImmagineMarc
                Dell'ImmagineController
                and Principal Accounting Officer
 
 A
        SIGNED
        ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED
        TO
        COMC, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY COMC, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
        AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST
Document

Exhibit 10.3
[DATE]




Dear    ,


Congratulations! Because your contribution to Root’s future success is critical, you are being offered a one-time retention incentive. The elements of this incentive are as follows:
•a one-time cash payment in the amount of $    (less applicable withholdings and standard deductions) if you are employed with Root, in good standing, on December 1, 2022, to be paid in a lump sum on the first regular payroll following December 1, 2022; and
•a one time RSU retention grant in the amount of $    to be granted on [DATE] and to fully vest on June 15, 2023, subject to the terms and conditions of the Root, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.
You are part of a small group of employees being offered this retention incentive. As with other compensation-related information, we ask that you exercise discretion with the details of your selection for the incentive program. Thank you for your ongoing commitment to Root, our colleagues and our customers. Please sign below and return to [CONTACT] no later than [DATE].
Here’s to our continued future success. Let’s do this together,
/s/ Michele Streitmatter


Michele










EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE:
I understand that my employment is at-will, that this letter does not change my at-will status, and that this letter does not supersede any other agreements between Root and me. By signing below I represent that I understand the terms of the retention program.






  __________________
Employee Signature & Date
Exhibit 21.0

List of Subsidiaries

Registrant: BV Financial, Inc.



|                                  |  |                      |  |                                       
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                      |  | Percentage Ownership |  | Jurisdiction or State of Incorporation
|Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank |  | 100%                 |  | United States                         

Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank



|                             |  |                      |  |                                       
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                 |  | Percentage Ownership |  | Jurisdiction or State of Incorporation
|Housing Recovery Corporation |  | 100%                 |  | Maryland
# Official Journal C 101I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 101I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6328 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 101I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6328 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 101 I/01 | Communication from the Commission amending the Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the Member States on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to short-term export-credit insurance | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 101 I/01

Communication from the Commission amending the Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the Member States on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to short-term export-credit insurance

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.2   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John F. McGrath, Jr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. August 7, 2007  /s/ JOHN F. MCGRATH, JR.John F. McGrath, Jr. 
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Renato COBANKA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Chance MCCLAIN Esq., Third Party, and Dominique M. Barteet, Appellants, v. George J. JANSSEN, Appellee.

No. 4D17-0978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 26, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00243-CV

MILAGROS D. GUGLIUZZA, Appellant

V.

CHARLES JOHN GUGLIUZZA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-73819

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed December 18, 2013. 

Appellant filed an untimely motion for new trial on January 21, 2014. Appellant’s 

notice of appeal was filed March 25, 2014.

The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is 

signed when appellant has not filed a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify 

the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusion of 
2

law. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. 

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, 

acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided 

by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 

959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided 

by Rule 26.3

On May 12, 2014, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to 

entertain the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
STATE of Louisiana v. Quendon Mondreill BERNARD

NO. 2018-KH-0523

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 (adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration of California Steel
Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ending September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                 |  |  |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|October 27, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ BRETT GUGE                                      
|                 |  |  |  | Brett Guge                                          
|                 |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, M. H. McIlvain, President and CFO, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Golden Chief
     Resources, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
     the registrant and we have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant is made known to us by others within the Corporation,
          particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
          prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
     over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006

By: /s/ M. H. McIlvain
----------------------
M. H. McIlvain
President and Chief Financial Officer
# L_2013240EN.01S00302.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
Jose Arturo AVENDANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4360

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Claire S. BeanClaire S. BeanChief Financial Officer
Ryan Oswald ROMAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-4027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

I, Jon Correio, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Electronic Systems Technology Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)[Omitted as permitted by Exchange Act Release No. 47986];
c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 12, 2010

By: /s/ JON CORREIO
Jon Correio
Vice President, Finance and Administration
STATE of Louisiana v. Woodrow KAREY, Jr.

NO. 2018-KD-0533

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 2018

Denied.