alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 231/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 231 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 504 September 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 231

English edition

Legislation

Volume 504 September 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1023/2007 of 3 September 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1024/2007 of 3 September 2007 modifying Regulation (EC) No 409/2007 replacing Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EC) No 673/2005 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of America | 3 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1025/2007 of 3 September 2007 amending for the 85th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 | 4 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1023/2007 of 3 September 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1024/2007 of 3 September 2007 modifying Regulation (EC) No 409/2007 replacing Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EC) No 673/2005 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of America

3

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1025/2007 of 3 September 2007 amending for the 85th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit 10.36**

 

Compensatory Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors 

 

Each director who is not an employee of Lifeline Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) receives (i) an annual retainer of$12,000, (ii) a fee equal to $1,000 for each Board meeting that the non-employee director attends (either in person or by telephone) and (iii) $500 for each Committee meeting that the non-employee director attends (either in person or by telephone),although no additional fee is paid for attendance at a Committee meeting that is on the same day as a Board meeting. The Chairman of the Board also receives an annual fee of $12,500 and the Chairmen of the Audit and Compensation Committees eachreceive an annual fee of $3,500. 

 

In addition, theCompany’s 2000 Stock Incentive Plan provides that, on the sixth business day of each calendar year, each non-employee director will receive a stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair marketvalue of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. Such options vest as to one-third of the underlying shares on the date of grant, and vest as to an additional one-third of the underlying shares on each of the first two anniversaries ofthe date of grant. 

 

The Company also reimburses itsnon-employee directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board or Committee meetings.
Corey RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2681

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-19
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-19


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.


/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                     Dated: March 28, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                Dated: March 28, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 68 (Friday, April 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6575]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Judith Leyster''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``Judith Leyster,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the National Gallery of Art, from on or about 
June 21, 2009, until on or about November 29, 2009, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: April 1, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-8230 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN the INTEREST OF C.J., a child.

C.J., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian ad litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-3137

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Premier Pegasus Air Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Andrew Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
6th day of April, 2005.



/s/ Andrew Jones
-------------------------------
Andrew Jones
President and CEO
Pegasus Air Group, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 (adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|August 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ RICARDO BERNARDES                
|                |  |  |  | Ricardo Bernardes                    
|                |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Finance and
|                |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of SmartMetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: October 13, 2010
By:
/s/ Colin HendrickColin Hendrick

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00689- CR Do nal d Ra ye Br own, A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF COM AL COUNTY NO. 2005CR08 30, H ONO RAB LE BRENDA CHAP MAN, JUDGE P RESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Do na ld R aye B ro wn

se e ks to a pp e a l f ro m a jud g me nt o f c onvic tio n f

or dr ivi ngwh ile intox icated. T he trial c ourt has cer tified that this is a plea barg ain case and Br own has no right of appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 25.2(a) (2). The appea l is dism issed. Se eid . rule 25.2(d) .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Nove mber 9, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofBenjamin Franklin Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe Year Ended December 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of thesignatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Thomas R. Venables       Thomas R. Venables *Chief Executive Officer*Date: March 29, 2005
a1063-conformedamendment






1  AMENDMENT 2021-2  THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND AFFILIATES  DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVE PLAN  (as amended and restated as of January 1, 2020)  WHEREAS, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (“PNC”) sponsors The PNC  Financial Services Group, Inc. and Affiliates Deferred Compensation and Incentive Plan (the  “Plan”);  WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Plan authorizes PNC to amend the Plan; and  WHEREAS, PNC wishes to amend the Plan to (i) merge the Compass SmartInvestor  401(k) Benefit Restoration Plan with and into the Plan; and (ii) make other clarifying changes.  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, that, effective as of December 1, 2021 (or such  other date as set forth below, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:  1. Effective December 1, 2021, a new Appendix B is added to the Plan immediately following Appendix A, to read as follows:  “APPENDIX B  MERGER OF THE BBVA BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN  Prior to the effective date of the transaction described in Share Purchase Agreement,  dated as of November 15, 2020 (as amended), between Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.  and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (the “Transaction”), the accrued benefits of all but  one participant under the Compass SmartInvestor 401(k) Benefit Restoration Plan (the “BBVA  Benefit Restoration Plan”) were spun off and transferred to Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria,  S.A. (or an affiliate that did not become an affiliate of the Corporation following Transaction).   The remaining participant in the BBVA Benefit Restoration Plan after the Transaction was in  payment status, and no employees were eligible, nor could any become eligible, to participate in  the BBVA Benefit Restoration Plan.  Effective December 1, 2021, the BBVA Benefit  Restoration Plan was merged with and into the Plan, and the benefit payments to the single  legacy BBVA Benefit Restoration Plan participant became an obligation of the Plan (which  benefit payments could be made from the Trust or any grantor trust established prior to the  Transaction to assist in funding obligations under the BBVA Benefit Restoration Plan).  In  accordance with the terms of the BBVA Benefit Election Plan and his elections, the remaining  participant in the legacy BBVA Benefit Restoration Plan is receiving a benefit in the form of  thirty-six monthly installments, the last of which is due on July 1, 2024 and, if he dies before  such date, the monthly installments will continue to be made to his Beneficiary following his  death until July 1, 2024.  [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]  Exhibit 10.6.3 





 






[Signature Page to Amendment 2021-2 to  The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Affiliates Deferred Compensation and Incentive Plan]    Executed and adopted by the Chief Human Resources Officer of The PNC Financial Services  Group, Inc. this 30th day of November, 2021 pursuant to the authority delegated by the PNC’s  Human Resources Committee.    /s/ Vicki C. Henn     Vicki C. Henn  Executive Vice President  Chief Human Resources Officer
No. 85-6684.

#### Randall *v.*United States District Court for the Central District of California.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Jeffery Warren SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tracy JOHNSON; Shirley Meyers; Jack Meyers, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-41708

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 24, 2004.

Jeffery Warren Sanders, Fort Stockton, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

*500PER CURIAM:*

Jeffery Warren Sanders, Texas prisoner # 680206, appeals the dismissal of his *pro se, in forma pauperis*42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. He asserts that the defendants engaged in fraud and unfair practices in filing a police report against him for a bad check charge, which resulted in his plea of *nolo contendere*to the offense and to a revocation of his parole. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing as frivolous Sanders’s claims, inasmuch as his allegations implicate the invalidity of his conviction and revocation, and Sanders has not demonstrated that these have been invalidated. *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); *Siglar v. Hightower,*112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir.1997). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
C.C., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0369

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2018

Jeffrey L. Barrett, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Ward L. Metzger, Children's Legal Services, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(*l* ) ; Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i).

Lewis, Roberts, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Ronetta F. FORDE, Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D17-328

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ralph Monroe HAIR, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., n/k/a Florida Hospital Tampa; Julie Goddard, as Guardian of the Property of J.D.S., a minor; St. Joseph's Women's Hospital, a wholly-owned subsidiary of St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc.; Pediatrix Medical Group of Florida, Inc. ; and The University of South Florida Board of Trustees, Appellees.

Case No. 2D15-3296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CHARLESTON.

#### Furbee *et al. v.*Shay *et al.*

Submitted June 19, 1899

Decided November 11, 1899.

1. Justice of the *Peace*— Appeal.

If there has been a full and fair trial on the merits of the controversy in a civil action commenced before a justice, the judgment will not be reversed for mere technical errors, not prejudicial to the fairness of such trial. (p. 737).

2. *Judgment*— Reversal.

The party complaining- must show error to his prejudice to-secure reversal of a judgment against him. (p. 737).

3. *Record*— Bills *of Exceptions.*

When alleged bills of exception are not properly certified and made parts of the record, this Court will not consider the grounds of error thereby presented, (p. 737).

Error to Circuit Court, Tjder County.

Action by D. M. Furbee and others against Shay & McMullen. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error.

*Affirmed.*

ShaNOr & Hunt, for plaintiff in error.

J. V. Blair, for defendant in error.

Dent, PresideNt:

This is an action of debt originally instituted by Fur-bee Bros, and Smith against Shay & McMullen, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants for the sum of one hundred and forty-one dollars and twenty-five cents. The defendants appealed to the circuit court of Tyler County, wherein the same result was reached. They then came to this Court, and here rely on the following errors:

*737First, that the jury was sworn to try the “matters in difference” before the issue was made up. This question has been settled by this Court in the case of *White*v. *Em*blem, 43 W. Va. 819, (28 S. E. 761). Also see *Griffin*v. *Haught,*W. Va. (31 S. E. 957). In actions originating in a justice's court, when there has been a fair trial on the merits of the controversy, no mere technical objection to the pleadings and issue, not prejudicial to the party complaining, will be deemed sufficient cause for reversing the judgment.

Second, that the circuit court erroneously instructed the jury, and refused to give a proper instruction asked by the defendants, or to set aside the verdict of the jury as contrary to the law and the evidence. These alleged errors depend entirely on the alleged bills of exception, none of which are properly made parts of the record, and therefore they cannot be considered by this Court. *Criffith*v. *Corrothers,*42 W. Va. 59, (24 S. E. 569); *Craft*v. Mann, 46 W. Va. 478, (33 S. E. 260). The record disclosing no error prejudicial to the defendants, the judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF OFFICERS


PURSUANT
      TO 18 USC SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE


SARBANES
      - OXLEY


ACT
      OF
      2002





I,
      John
      A. Dugan, Chairman and Director (the "principal executive officer") of
      SFG


Financial
      Corporation (the "Registrant") certify that to the best of my


knowledge,
      based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the


period
      ended accompanying this Certification, of the Registrant (the
      "Report");





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section


13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934,as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all


material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the


Registrant.





**SFG
              FINANCIAL CORPORATION**Date: January
              22, 2007
            By:
            /s/ John
              A.
              DuganChairman/CEO
              and
              Director
Mervin G. RHODES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5156

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Ian ROWAN

NO. 2018-KK-0514

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 12, 2018

Writ granted in part. The evidence is sufficient to support a finding of probable cause for the illegal use of a weapon.
Michael M. BARNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.