alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2582 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2582

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain textile device book style 
                                covers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain textile device book style 
                                covers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TEXTILE DEVICE BOOK STYLE COVERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Book cover style    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        covers with an                                                     31/2015.......
                        exterior surface
                        of textile
                        materials
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6307.90.98)
                        designed for
                        portable
                        electronic
                        devices of a kind
                        classified in
                        headings 8470,
                        8471, 8543 and
                        8517.............

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021471EN.01004602.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2021 — Kočner v Europol

(Case T-528/20) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Expert reports carried out by Europol for the purposes of national criminal proceedings - Alleged unauthorised disclosure of data - Regulation (EU) 2016/794 - Article 50(1) - Non-material harm - Causal link)

(2021/C 471/65)

Language of the case: Slovakian

Parties

Applicant: Marián Kočner (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: M. Mandzák and M. Para, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (represented by: A. Nunzi, B. De Buck, T. Zwingler and A. van Oostenbrugge, acting as Agents, and by G. Ziegenhorn, M. Kottmann and S. Schulz-Große, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. Rodríguez de la Rúa Puig, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of Europol’s disclosure of personal data and Europol’s inclusion of his name on the ‘Mafia lists’.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Marián Kočner to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Marián Kočner to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol);

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 339, 12.10.2020.

---
Gerry PARISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2551

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 30, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        28433703
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          950000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4900000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   83722801
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      376796936
<ALLOWANCE>                                   33636920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               531531070
<DEPOSITS>                                   478704932
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2552452
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            6638076
<LONG-TERM>                                    6950769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        413792
<OTHER-SE>                                    36271049
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               531531070
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               17445895
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2502532
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                560727
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              20509154
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            10412740
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            10758512
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          9750642
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   396744
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               11508
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               10781303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2211682
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2211682
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1588999
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.36
<LOANS-NON>                                    1412000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1543000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2131354
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   502590
<RECOVERIES>                                     57365
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3363620
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           3363620
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.6



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert A. Archer, Chief Executive Officer
of Great Panther Silver Limited (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the
“Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        | /s/ Robert A. Archer   
| | Name:  | Robert A. Archer       
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 30, 2015
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 HONEY STEWART,

3 Petitioner-Appellee,

4 v. No. 31,579

5 JOHN MICHAEL STEWART,

6 Respondent-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF McKINLEY COUNTY

8 Louis E. Depauli, Jr., District Judge

9 Rabb & Beal PLLC

10 Lloyd Rabb, III

11 Tucson, AZ

12 for Appellee

13 John Michael Stewart

14 Gallup, NM

15 Pro se Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
2

1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,

3 and the time for doing so has expired. 

4 Affirmed.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 

7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 

10 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge

11 

12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
REFRIGERANT SOLUTIONS LIMITED

8 Murieston Road, Hale, Altrincham, Cheshire WA15 9ST

Tel: (+44)(0)161 926 9876 Fax: (+44)(0)161 926 9875

Mob: 07785 242552 E-mail: rs@refsols.com

Web: www.refsols.com

Our ref: JEP/nb

Date: 10 April 2013

Melissa Fiffer

Alternatives & Emissions Reduction Branch

Stratrospheric Protection Division

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Washington D.C. 20460

USA

By e-mail and post

Dear Ms Fiffer,

SNAP SUBMISSION FOR RS-50 (R442A)

As you are aware, we submitted an application for our refrigerant RS-50, with an 

ASHRAE number of R442A, to be added to the US SNAP list on 26 July 2011. 

According to your letter dated 30 November 2011, our submission “was complete as 

of October 26, 2011. EPA has 90 days from this date to render a decision concerning 

the substitute’s acceptability in the specified end-uses. Pending EPA’s decision, RS50 may be sold in the U.S in the specific end-uses listed above as of January 24, 2012. 

EPA expects to issue a preliminary determination, and will notify you in a letter.”

Despite several reminders & requests by e-mail, we have not yet received the 

preliminary determination letter from EPA that RS-50 will be added to the SNAP list, 

and we are nearly 18 months from when you confirmed that our submission was 

complete. You say that EPA is mandated to give a decision within 90 days, so I do 

not understand why this is taking so long.

I would also remind you that, as I have previously advise by e-mail (1 December 

2011) RS-50 is not only a replacement for R22 but also a low global warming & 

highly energy efficient alternative to R404A and R507. You have said that you will 

consider RS-50 in comparison not just to ODS, but also to all available alternatives in 

these refrigeration uses. In addition, you said EPA, when the listing is published in the 

Federal register, will include a comparison to other alternatives such as R404A and 

R507.
2

2

Please can you explain to me why you have not as yet issued the preliminary 

determination letter, and when RS-50 will be formally added to the SNAP list with 

publication in the Federal Register.

I look forward to your response.

Yours sincerely,

J E Poole
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17470-17471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13367-000]


Community Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Applications 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

April 8, 2009.
    On February 6, 2009, Community Hydro, LLC, filed an application, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the Littleville Dam Hydroelectric Project, to be 
located on the Middle Branch of the Westfield River, in Hampshire and 
Hampden Counties, Massachusetts.
    The proposed Littleville Dam Hydroelectric Project would be located 
at: (1) The existing 1,360-foot-long U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
Littleville Dam; (2) an existing Corps intake tower and control works; 
and (3) an existing 584-acre reservoir with 31,200 acre-feet of 
storage.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) Six new turbine 
generating units attached to the intake tower with a total installed 
capacity of 0.85 megawatts; (2) a new 3-phase transmission line and 
transformer connected to an existing above ground distribution system; 
and (3) appurtenant facilities. The Littleville Dam Project would have 
an estimated average annual generation of 3,000 megawatt-hours, which 
would be sold to local utilities.
    Applicant Contact: Ms. Lori Barg, Community Hydro, LLC, 113 
Bartlett Rd., Plainfield, VT 05667, phone (802) 454-1874.
    FERC Contact: John Ramer, (202) 502-8969.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at

[[Page 17471]]

http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this 
project can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-13367) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-8559 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6633

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL DEVON POWELL, a/k/a Petey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (7:99-cr-00024-3F; 7:04-cv-00077-F)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Devon Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Devon Powell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Powell has not

made the requisite showing. In addition, the court limits its

review to the issues raised in Appellant’s informal brief. See 4th

Cir. R. 34(b). This court generally does not consider issues

raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1

F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (noting that issues raised for the

first time on appeal are generally not considered absent

exceptional circumstances). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
- 3 -

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Official Journal C 301A/19 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 301A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5919 August 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 301A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5919 August 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2016/C 301 A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/196/S — Director (Function group AD, grade 14) — Directorate-General for Translation — Directorate for Support and Technological Services for Translation | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2016/C 301 A/01

Recruitment notice PE/196/S — Director (Function group AD, grade 14) — Directorate-General for Translation — Directorate for Support and Technological Services for Translation

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as the Principal Executive Officer of Energy Partners, Ltd. (the
Company), that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Alan D. Bell             
|Chief Restructuring Officer  
|(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: September 8, 2009
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF **FINANCIAL** OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vitaly Melnikov, Chief  Financial Officer of Evolving Gold Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the  Annual Report on Form 20-F, of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31,  2008 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                          

| | By:    | /s/ ***Vitaly  Melnikov***
| | ------ | --------------------------
| | Name:  | Vitaly Melnikov           
| | Title: | Chief Financial  Officer  
| |        |                           
| |        |                           
| |        |                           
| | Date:  | July 28, 2008             

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         916,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               916,876
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 916,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,616,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   916,876
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               426,516
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               233,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             218,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,463)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Anthony Ray PEEK, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 1D17-3538

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Emanuel POTTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-0946

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*