alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2509 

To suspend temporarily the duty on programmable controllers certified by 

the importer as designed for use in agricultural and off-road construction 

vehicles to control vehicle accessories and auxiliary functions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on programmable controllers certified by the importer as designed for use in 

agricultural and off-road construction vehicles to control 

vehicle accessories and auxiliary functions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2509 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROGRAMMABLE CONTROLLERS CERTIFIED 

2 BY THE IMPORTER AS DESIGNED FOR USE IN 

3 AGRICULTURAL AND OFF-ROAD CONSTRUC4 TION VEHICLES TO CONTROL VEHICLE AC5 CESSORIES AND AUXILIARY FUNCTIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Programmable controllers 

certified by the importer as 

designed for use in agricultural and off-road construction vehicles to control vehicle 

accessories and auxiliary 

functions (provided for in 

subheading 8537.10.90) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

12 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

13 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000751684
<NAME> COLUMBIA LEASE INCOME FUND 1B
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         145,470
<SECURITIES>                                     8,271
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,610
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,352
<PP&E>                                         687,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                 653,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    10,026,879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,999,425)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,176
<SALES>                                        126,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,692
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               104,769
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                194,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            194,054
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   194,054
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           4,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,603
<INVENTORY>                                     48,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,121
<PP&E>                                          37,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,874
<BONDS>                                         15,390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,349
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,863
<SALES>                                         81,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,196
<CGS>                                           44,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,240,411
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         950,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 95,866,751
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      95,866,751
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        95,866,751
<LOANS>                                    443,436,741
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,869,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             607,839,463
<DEPOSITS>                                 538,135,862
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,003,068
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          7,508,328
<LONG-TERM>                                  7,335,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       465,685
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,391,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             607,839,463
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,650,297
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,450,057
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                37,288
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            12,137,642
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,744,087
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,016,937
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,120,705
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  229,792
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,982,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                774,682
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     774,682
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   586,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.68
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,876,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 2,472,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,970,597
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  371,547
<RECOVERIES>                                    40,238
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,869,080
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,869,080
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00452-CV

Roya Gessel, Appellant

v.

Jesse Gessel, Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-18-001790, THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ARTH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Roya Gessel seeks to appeal a final decree of divorce signed by the district court 

on November 20, 2018. The thirty-day deadline for filing her notice of appeal to this Court was 

December 20, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). However, she did not file her notice of 

appeal to this Court until July 9, 2019, and she did not seek an extension of time to file it. See id. 

R. 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See id. 

R. 25.1(b); Gardner v. Gardner, No. 01-17-00525-CV, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 7606, at *2 

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 10, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing untimely appeal 

of divorce decree).
2

On August 12, 2019, this Court requested that appellant Gessel file a written 

response demonstrating our jurisdiction over her appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). She did

not file any response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. 

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 27, 2019
EXHIBIT 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael L. Schumacher, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pride, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such valuation; and

          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Dated:  October 12, 2005


 /s/ Michael L. Schumacher
Michael L. Schumacher
President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer
 and Chief Financial Officer
Michael GRAGG, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-797

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 20, 2018

Michael Gragg, Monticello, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the December 12, 2017 order denying Petitioner's pro se motion for post-conviction relief, filed in Case No. 2012-CF-32584-A in the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Brevard County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
LLANO FINANCING GROUP, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, Appellant, v. Anthony M. KANARIS, Edward Lafuente, and Anthony M. Kanaris & Associates, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-441

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1897 

IN RE: REBECCA ROBINSON DOWDY,

Debtor.

-------------------------------

REBECCA ROBINSON DOWDY,

Debtor - Appellant,

versus

OTIS DOWDY,

Debtor - Appellee,

and

REBECCA CONNELLY,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-02-1222-7; BK-00-941-7)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Malissa L.

Giles, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Rebecca Robinson Dowdy appeals the district court’s

orders: (1) dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court and

(2) denying her motions for reconsideration and for an extension of

time to file a notice of appeal. Our review of the record and the

district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Dowdy v. Dowdy, Nos. CA-02-1222-7; BK-00-941-7 (W.D.

Va. June 20, 2003; July 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Patricia WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gwendolyn MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-56890.

D.C. No. CV-02-04650-NM(SGL).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2004.*

Decided May 27, 2004.

Patricia Wright, Chowchilla, CA, pro se.

Alan D. Tate, Jennevee H. De Guzman, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney *801General (LA), Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: SNEED, SKOPIL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Patricia Wright appeals pro se the district court’s denial of her habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, *see Clark v. Murphy,*331 F.3d 1062, 1067 (9th Cir.2003), and affirm.

Wright contends that her due process rights were violated by the prosecution’s sixteen-year pre-indictment delay. She argues that she was prejudiced by the delay because of lost or faded memories of witnesses, deceased or otherwise unavailable witnesses, and lost evidence.

We conclude that Wright has failed to meet her burden of demonstrating actual, non-speeulative prejudice from the delay. *See United States v. Moran,*759 F.2d 777, 782 (9th Cir.1985). The state court’s conclusion that Wright failed to demonstrate actual prejudice was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly binding precedent of the United States Supreme Court and was not based on an unreasonable determination of facts. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) *&*(2); *see Lockyer v. Andrade,*538 U.S. 63, 70-75, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003).

Wright’s motion for appointment of counsel, investigators, and expert witnesses and her request to file first of seven supplemental briefs are denied. AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 4.2


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated February 18, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1842 contained in Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-220249) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


February 18, 2022
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00619

- CR

Rudy MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The State of

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4957

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment revoking

Appellant’s deferred adjudication is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED October 14, 2015.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos Manuel PACHECO-CAMACHO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-30170.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Michael J. Brown, AUSA, USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*201Harrison Stewart Latto, Esq., Law Office of Harrison S. Latto, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Carlos Manuel Pacheco-Camacho appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for one count of unlawful reentry into the United States by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Pacheco-Camacho has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Pacheco-Camacho has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

We REMAND to the district court with directions to correct the judgment to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). *See United States v. Herrera-Blanco,*232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Antonio ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-748

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### Re: A case for gas drilling Greg Ricks to: Nick Parsons 08/01/2010 11:44 AM

Good morning, I just wanted to write and ask that the EPA not throw the baby out with the bath water. We need to have responsible gas drilling but we don 't need to stop gas drilling. If America is to ever achieve any semblance of energy independence we have to exploit our own resources and natural gas is one of our most plentiful, safest and economical sources of energy .
There is an email going around trying to scare folks and get them to deluge you with emails "demanding" you do this and do that to curtail the "evil" gas drillers. I know from personal experience that this group is led by people who have their own axe to grind and are not as interested in "protecting" us as they let on. I hope you won't be overly influenced by the emails you 'll get from them and their followers. Balance is the key word here. We have to balance America's need for home grown energy with protecting the environment .
Thank you for reading my email.

Greg Ricks President: Woodhaven Neighborhood Association 720 Oakwood Trial Fort Worth, TX 76112 817-429-4949

PS I don't work of the gas energy. I just think our dependence on foreign sources of energy is more of a threat to our long term health than drilling is.