Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 14, 2009 / Notices 17159 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Internatioinal Trade Administration 

[A–580–816] 

Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from the Republic 

of Korea: Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, In Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 30, 2008, we 

published the notice of initiation of this 

antidumping duty administrative review 

with respect to Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., 

Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk), 

Haewon MSC Co., Ltd., Hyundai 

HYSCO, LG Chem, Ltd., Pohang Iron 

and Steel Co., Ltd/Pohang Coated Steel 

Co., Ltd., and Union Steel 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd, for the period 

August 1, 2007, through July 31, 2008. 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 73 FR 56795 (September 30, 2008) 

(Notice of Initiation). Dongkuk 

submitted a letter to the Department that 

it had no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the U.S. during the 

period of review (POR). See Letter from 

Dongkuk to the Secretary of Commerce 

dated October 20, 2008. The Department 

corroborated the claim of no shipments 

by Dongkuk. See memo from 

Christopher Hargett, International Trade 

Compliance Analyst, Office 3, through 

James Terpstra, Program Manager, 

Office 3, to Melissa Skinner, Office 

Director, Office 3, Import 

Administration, dated March 27, 2009 

(No Shipment Analysis). We have 

preliminarily determined that the 

review of Dongkuk should be rescinded. 

This review will remain in effect for all 

other companies initiated upon. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 14, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Hargett, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4161. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 30, 2008, we published 

the Notice of Initiation of this 

antidumping duty administrative review 

with respect to Dongkuk. On October 

20, 2008, Dongkuk submitted a letter 

certifying that it had so sales of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. The Department used entry 

data placed on the record for selection 

of respondents for individual review for 

the instant review to corroborate 

Dongkuk’s claim. See memo from Joy 

Zhang, International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, through James Terpstra 

Program Manager, Office 3 AD/CVD 

Operations, and Melissa Skinner, Office 

Director, Office 3, AD/CVD Operations, 

to the File dated October 2, 2008 (CBP 

Data). On December 9, 2008, the 

Department requested the U.S. entry 

documents from U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection for clarification of 

several entries. See memo from Melissa 

Skinner, Office Director, Office Director, 

Office 3, AD/CVD Operations, to David 

M. Genovese, Director, AD/CVD/ 

Revenue Policy & Programs, Office of 

International Trade, U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection, dated December 9, 

2008 (Entry Documentation Request). 

On January 26, 2009, the Department 

received the requested entry 

documentation. See memo from Tom 

Futtner, Customs Unit, to Melissa 

Skinner, dated January 2, 2009 (Entry 

Documentation). On March 27, 2009, 

the Department determined that 

Dongkuk’s claim of no shipments was 

corroborated using the entry 

documentation. See No Shipment 

Analysis. 

Scope of the Order 

This order covers cold–rolled (cold– 

reduced) carbon steel flat–rolled carbon 

steel products, of rectangular shape, 

either clad, plated, or coated with 

corrosion–resistant metals such as zinc, 

aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickelor iron–based alloys, whether or not 

corrugated or painted, varnished or 

coated with plastics or other 

nonmetallic substances in addition to 

the metallic coating, in coils (whether or 

not in successively superimposed 

layers) and of a width of 0.5 inch or 

greater, or in straight lengths which, if 

of a thickness less than 4.75 millimeters, 

are of a width of 0.5 inch or greater and 

which measures at least 10 times the 

thickness or if of a thickness of 4.75 

millimeters or more are of a width 

which exceeds 150 millimeters and 

measures at least twice the thickness, as 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item numbers 

7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 

7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 

7210.49.0090, 7210.61.0000, 

7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 

7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 

7210.90.1000, 7210.90.6000, 

7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 

7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 

7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 

7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 

7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000, 

7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000, 

7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 

7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 

7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 

7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090. Included in 

this order are corrosion–resistant flat– 

rolled products of non–rectangular 

cross–section where such cross–section 

is achieved subsequent to the rolling 

process (i.e., products which have been 

‘‘worked after rolling’’) – for example, 

products which have been beveled or 

rounded at the edges. Excluded from 

this order are flat–rolled steel products 

either plated or coated with tin, lead, 

chromium, chromium oxides, both tin 

and lead (terne plate), or both chromium 

and chromium oxides (tin–free steel), 

whether or not painted, varnished or 

coated with plastics or other 

nonmetallic substances in addition to 

the metallic coating. Also excluded from 

this order are clad products in straight 

lengths of 0.1875 inch or more in 

composite thickness and of a width 

which exceeds 150 millimeters and 

measures at least twice the thickness. 

Also excluded from this order are 

certain clad stainless flat–rolled 

products, which are three–layered 

corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat– 

rolled products less than 4.75 

millimeters in composite thickness that 

consist of a carbon steel flat–rolled 

product clad on both sides with 

stainless steel in a 20%-60%-20% ratio. 

The above HTSUS item numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written descriptions 

remain dispositive. 

Intent to Rescind the 2007–2008 

Administrative Review, in Part 

Dongkuk submitted a letter on 

October 20, 2008, certifying that it did 

not have sales of subject merchandise to 

the United States during the POR. The 

petitioners, United States Steel 

Corporation, Nucor Corporation, and 

Mittal Steel USA ISG, Inc. did not 

comment on Dongkuk’s no–shipment 

claim. 

We conducted an internal customs 

data query on October 2, 2008, as part 

of the selection of respondents for 

individual review. See CBP Data. The 

data query showed several questionable 

entries, of which the Department 

requested entry documents. See Entry 

Documentation Request. The 

documentation showed that the 

questionable entries from the CBP data 

were not produced by Dongkuk. See 

Entry Documentation. 

Based on our analysis of the shipment 

data, Dongkuk is a non–shipper for this 

review. See No Shipment Analysis. 

17160 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 14, 2009 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 72 FR 

61621 (October 31, 2007). 

2On April 11, 2008, Lian Li submitted similar 

reconciliation information for itself, Sentian, and 

MPF. 

3See Certain Lined Paper Products from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limits for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 80366 (December 31, 

2008). 

4See Memorandum to the File, regarding 

Verification of the sales and Factors of Production 

Responses of Lian Li Paper Products Co., Ltd. in the 

First Administrative Review of Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China, dated 

February 26, 2008 (Lian Li Verification Report). See 

also Memorandum to the File, regarding 

Verification of the Factors of Production Responses 

of MPF in the First Administrative Review of 

Certain Lined Paper Products from the People’s 

Republic of China, dated February 26, 2008 (MPF 

Verification Report). See also Memorandum to the 

File, regarding Verification of the Factors of 

Production Responses of Sentian in the First 

Administrative Review of Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China, dated 

February 26, 2008 (Sentian Verification Report). 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our 

practice, we preliminarily determine to 

rescind this review. See, e.g., Stainless 

Steel Bar from India; Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Review, and Partial Rescission 

of Administrative Review, 65 FR 12209 

(March 8, 2000); Persulfates From the 

People’s Republic of China; Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review, 65 

FR 18963 (April 10, 2000). 

Public Comment 

An interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this preliminary notice. See 19 CFR 

351.310(c). Any hearing, if requested, 

will be held 44 days after the date of 

publication of this preliminary notice, 

or the first working day thereafter. 

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this preliminary notice. 

See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in such 

briefs, may be filed no later than five 

days after the time limit for filing the 

case brief 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties 

who submit arguments are requested to 

submit with the argument (1) a 

statement of the issue, (2) a brief 

summary of the argument, and (3) a 

table of authorities. Further, parties 

submitting written comments should 

provide the Department with an 

additional copy of the public version of 

any such comments on diskette. The 

Department will issue the final notice, 

which will include the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in any such 

comments, or at a hearing, if requested, 

within 120 days of publication of this 

preliminary notice. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: April 8, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–8497 Filed 4–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–901 

Certain Lined Paper Products from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 7, 2008, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the first administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

certain lined paper products (CLPP) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC). See Certain Lined Paper Products 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Notice of Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 73 FR 58540 (October 7, 2008) 

(Preliminary Results). We invited parties 

to comment on the Preliminary Results. 

This review covers the following 

exporters and/or producer/exporters: (1) 

Shanghai Lian Li Paper Products Co., 

Ltd. (Lian Li); (2) Hwa Fuh Plastics Co. 

Ltd./Li Teng Plastics (Shenzhen) Co., 

Ltd. (H.F. Plastics/ L.T. Plastics); (3) 

Leo’s Quality Products Co., Ltd./ 

Denmax Plastic Stationery Factory 

(Denmax/Leo’s Products); and (4) the 

Watanabe Group (which consists of the 

following three companies: Watanabe 

Paper Products (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. 

(Watanabe Shanghai); Watanabe Paper 

Products (Linqing) Co. Ltd. (Watanabe 

Linqing); and Hotrock Stationery 

(Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. (Hotrock 

Shenzhen)).1 We find that certain 

exporters and producers/exporters sold 

subject merchandise at prices below 

normal value (NV) during the period of 

review (POR) of April 17, 2006, through 

August 31, 2007. Based on our analysis 

of the comments received and 

verification findings, we have made 

changes to certain surrogate values and 

to Lian Li’s margin. Therefore, the final 

results differ from the Preliminary 

Results. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 14, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Victoria Cho or Cindy Lai Robinson, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5075 or (202) 482– 

3797, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

We published the preliminary results 

of the first administrative review on 

October 7, 2008, in the Federal Register. 

See Preliminary Results. Since the 

Preliminary Results, the following 

events have occurred: 

On October 2 and November 6, 2008, 

the Department issued two additional 

supplemental questionnaires to Lian Li. 

Lian Li submitted its responses on 

October 16 and November 25, 2008, 

respectively. In its November 25, 2008, 

response, Lian Li provided its sales 

reconciliation and the factors of 

production reconciliations for all three 

companies: Lian Li, Sentian Paper 

Product Co., Ltd. (Sentian), and 

Shanghai Miaopanfang Paper Product 

Co., Ltd. (MPF).2 On October 27 and 

December 17, 2008, the Association of 

American School Paper Suppliers, the 

petitioner, submitted comments on Lian 

Li’s October 16 and November 25, 2008, 

responses, respectively. On November 6, 

2008, Lian Li requested a hearing. The 

petitioner also requested a hearing on 

March 6, 2009. 

On December 31, 2008, the 

Department extended the time limit for 

the final results of this proceeding.3 On 

January 9, 2009, the petitioner 

submitted pre–verification comments 

regarding Lian Li. From January 12 

through 16, 2009, the Department 

conducted verification on Lian Li’s 

reported sales information and on the 

reported factors of production (FOP) 

information submitted by Lian Li and its 

two suppliers of subject merchandise in 

Shanghai: Sentian and MPF. On 

February 26, 2009, the Department 

issued three verification reports with 

respect to Lian Li and its two suppliers.4

On March 6, 2009, Lian Li and the