alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11 July 2013 

Docket Management Facility 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

To Whom It May Concern, 

; .J: . 

On behalf of Applied Research Associates (ARA), I am petitioning for an exemption to 14 CFR 

91.9 "Civil aircraft flight manual, marking, and placard requirements" paragraph (b)(l). ARA is 

a small Unmanned Aerial· System (UAS) mapufacturer currently in the process of receiving 

experimental certification for the Nighthawk. from ·the FAA. We request that this exemption be 

applicable to all UAS aircnift 'manufactured· by ARA ··designated under the Model name 

Nighthawk IV. Due to the small size of this unmanned aircraft, physical space and weight 

restrictions make it impossible to carry an approved flight manual onboard the aircraft (note 

dimensions on attached figure of Nighthawk UAS). Since this aircraft is unmanned, we are 

petitioning to have the manual readily available to the pilot in command on the ground in either ,, 

digital or hardcopy format. 

Vve believe that this exemption would provide a level of safety equal to the existing rule by 

allowing the approv~d flight manual to remain with the pilot on the ground and be available for 

reference should the need arise. From a safety perspective, this benefits the public as a whole. 

Thank you for your attention in this matter. You can reach me at the phone number listed below 

if you have any questions or need any additional information. 

Christopher Kirchhof '· 1;. ;· .. 

; . ~ 

Applied Research Associates, Inc. 

250 Beanville Road .~: .. 

Randolph, VT 05060 

(802) 728-4588 

.. ,, .. l 

: ~ ··. . . ~ 

~ ' ; ' ~ 'i ··, 

' ' 

·· .. ·" 

~. : 

,. . '1sb 'sean-~ille' Rbad • Randofph, VT 65060 · .. ; ; ~ .I ' r . • .~ . ·, • I ' • J f • • .• 1 ~ ; 

· Phone: 802-728-4588 'i "') .. 

.:~ 
-1-------, 

24.8" 

Schematic drawing of ARA 's Nighthawk UAS showing overall dimensions (inches). 

250 Beanville Road II Randolph, VT 05060 

Phone: 802-728-4588 

Page 2
Date: August 6, 2015 

TO: EPA and DOT 

SUBJECT: Proposed Green House Gas (GHG) and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and HeavyDuty Trucks--Comments 

Thank you for holding this hearing on the "Proposed GHG and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and 

Heavy-Duty Trucks." As stated in the EPA's name, your agency is a critical part of our world today with 

our complicated environment. I am here for myself and others like me who need these improved 

standards. I am a breast cancer survivor. After my diagnosis in 2007, I know very well how important 

life is and our time here. I have tried to live with as many healthy habits as I can. As my parents taught 

me, I don't smoke, or drink, and have never used drugs. I worked for the Social Security Administration 

until 5 years ago. I have 2 sisters that have never had any type of cancer. One major difference 

between them and me is where we live. I have always lived in Cook County, which has air grade of "F" 

per the American Lung Association. One sister lives in Albuquerque, which is grade "B", and the other 

lives in Pittsburgh, which is grade "D." We can't all move to Albuquerque. 

One current fact of Breast cancer is that I am one of almost 3 million breast cancer survivors alive in the 

U.S. today per the National Cancer Institute. We are the largest group of cancer survivors in the 

country. Nearly everyone in this room probably knows someone who is a survivor. That is the good 

news. 

On the other side, I will always have side effects from my successful treatments. Because my immune 

system has been compromised, I am more sensitive to air and other environmental problems, such as 

air pollution. As medical science continually improves treatment, even more people will survive breast 

cancer and will need improved air quality. 

The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to list categories of the sources that "cause or contribute significantly 

to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare." As the 

Supreme Court ruled in 2007, the GHGs (green house gases) meet the definition of "air pollutant. 

I hope that these fuel efficiency standard continue the work that you are doing to reduce the carbon 

emissions and numerous other air pollutants that are in our atmosphere. I very strongly hope that you 

will establish these Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy-Duty Trucks. 

In conclusion, I can be very careful about what I eat and drink, but it is much more difficult to watch 

what type of air I breathe. 

Above notes prepared by: Patricia Walter, (Residence, Glenview, Illinois)
# Official Journal L 282/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 282 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6531 October 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 282

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6531 October 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1998 of 20 September 2022 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1998 of 20 September 2022 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

I, Jon Correio, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of Electronic Systems Technology Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)  [Omitted as permitted by Exchange Act Release No. 47986];
c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 12, 2009

By: /s/ JON CORREIO
Jon Correio
Vice President, Finance and Administration
Bethann SHIRLEY v. Matthew SHIRLEY

2150818

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11 -- STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


The following tabulation presents the calculation of primary and fully diluted
earnings per common share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2000 and
1999:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                  March 31,
                                                                  ---------
                                                             2000           1999
                                                          ----------     ----------
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>
Reported net income ...................................   $  487,347     $  586,454
                                                          ==========     ==========

Net income on common shares ...........................   $  487,347     $  586,454
                                                          ==========     ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic ....    4,455,062      4,410,692
                                                          ==========     ==========

Net income per common share - basic
    Income from continuing operations .................   $     0.11     $     0.13
                                                          ==========     ==========

    Net income ........................................   $     0.11     $     0.13
                                                          ==========     ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted ..    4,662,811      4,520,569
                                                          ==========     ==========

Net income per common share - diluted
    Income from continuing operations .................   $     0.10     $     0.13
                                                          ==========     ==========

    Net income ........................................   $     0.10     $     0.13
                                                          ==========     ==========
</TABLE>



              [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
Dayna Blythe ANDERSSON, Appellant, v. ULF Patrick ANDERSSON, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1497

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Willie AKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3646

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          38,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,700
<INVENTORY>                                     92,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,700
<PP&E>                                       2,970,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,625,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,565,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          614,400
<BONDS>                                        190,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,073,000
<COMMON>                                         7,200
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,320,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,565,400
<SALES>                                        520,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               554,700
<CGS>                                          348,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  483,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (76,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (76,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Eric V. SCHREIBER, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3705

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Michael Vincent ANGUILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3964

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

**ON CONFESSION OF ERROR**

Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred by imposing: (1) a sentence for misdemeanor possession of cannabis in excess of the statutory maximum; (2) court costs for that offense under section 938.05(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2017), after imposing costs under the same statutory provision for a companion felony charge in the case; and (3) costs under section 318.18, Florida Statutes (2017), when no traffic offense was charged in the case. Appellee confesses error, and does not oppose reversal of the sentence on the cannabis charge and reversal of the order imposing the contested costs. After reviewing the record, we agree that the trial court erred. We reverse the sentence and contested costs imposed by the trial court for the cannabis charge and remand for further proceedings.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Ciklin, Damoorgian and Conner, JJ., concur.
Opinion issued March 2 6 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 8
- 0 0 949
- CV

——————————— WILNA ELORME , Appellant

V. MR PROPERTIES , Appellee

O n Appeal from the County Civil Co urt at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1118097

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Wilna Elorme , has failed to timely file her appellate brief. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6( a )(1), (d) , 38.8(a)(1). On January 1 1 , 201 9 , the Clerk of this
Court notified appellant that her deadline to file her appellant’s brief had expired and
that her appeal was subject to dismissal if she faile d to timely file h er appella n t ’s2

brief or an extension within 10 days of the date of that notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6(d), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3 (b). A ppellant failed to timely file a brief or request an
extension

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal fo r want of prosecution for failure to timely file an appellant’s brief

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices K ey es, Higley , and La n dau

.
Vandie ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-541

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Phillip A. JEAN-BAPTISTE, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D17-1280

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Thomas Joseph ZOZZARO, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Shari Lynn Brisson, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Masakazu Kurushima, in my capacity as the President and Chief Executive Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending June 30, 2007, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on July 30, 2007 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in
such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.

Dated: July 30, 2007



By:

/s/ MASAKAZU KURUSHIMAMasakazu KurushimaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2662
<SECURITIES>                                        87
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6186
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1135
<INVENTORY>                                        123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9734
<PP&E>                                           69448
<DEPRECIATION>                                   55496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3649
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           598
<OTHER-SE>                                       19613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23860
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Robert W.Wright, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of PRB Gas Transportation, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.                 Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                 Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a.                 All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b*.**               *Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 13, 2006

| /s/ ROBERT W. WRIGHT                                                             |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert W. Wright  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

 

----