### 21314 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

form for those reporting on program income; short form for all others) will be used for financial reporting.

Federal Cash Transaction Reports are due every calendar quarter to the Division of Payment Management, Payment Management Branch. Failure to submit timely reports may cause a disruption in timely payments to your organization.

Grantees are responsible and accountable for accurate reporting of the Progress Reports and FSRs which are generally due [semi-annually/annually]. FSRs (SF–269) are due 90 days after each budget period and the final SF–269 must be verified from the grantee records on how the value was derived.

Failure to submit required reports within the time allowed may result in suspension or termination of an active agreement, withholding of additional awards for the project, or other enforcement actions such as withholding of payments or converting to the reimbursement method of payment. Continued failure to submit required reports may result in one or both of the following: (1) The imposition of special award provisions; and (2) the non-funding or non-award of other eligible projects or activities. This applies whether the delinquency is attributable to the failure of the organization or the individual responsible for preparation of the reports.

Telecommunication for the hearing impaired is available at: TTY (301) 443–

6394. VII. Agency Contact(s)

Grants (Business)

Mr. Roscoe Brunson, Grants Management Specialist, 801 Thompson Ave., Reyes Bldg., Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone: (301) 443–5204. E-mail: Roscoe.Brunson@ihs.gov. Program (Programmatic/Technical)

Ms. Nancy Bill, Program Manager, IPP Program, HIS, 801 Thompson Ave, Suite 120, OEHE–DEHS TWB 610, Rockville, MD 20852. Phone: (301) 443–0105. Nancy.Bill@ihs.gov.

VIII. Other Information—Allowable and Non-Allowable Items

The following will be considered allowable equipment purchases— Equipment/Construction:

(1) Costs of breath testing devices are allowable, provided the device appears on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Conforming Products List (CPL) for this type of equipment.

(2) Police traffic radar—cost is allowable subject to the following: • Devices must appear on the NHTSA Conforming Products List (CPL) when published in the Federal Register

.

• Operators must be trained using the NHTSA radar operators training program or an approved equivalent.

• The police agency must implement a comprehensive radar operator and one to three year equipment certification program with periodic recertification once every one to three years.

(3) Costs for child restraint devices are allowable. Child safety seat restraint devices must be a ‘‘ 5 star rating ’’ in accordance with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Safety Standards (no after market devices) and strict performance standards (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, FMVSS 213,225).

(4) Cost for limited construction or home safety devices installation that is aligned with the program’s objectives or targets specific outcome in reducing unintentional fall prevention projects are acceptable.

(5) Media campaign when combined with enforcement, policy, or incentive programs (print, radio and video).

The following costs are deemed unallowable costs—Equipment/ Facilities:

(1) Police officer equipment— uniforms, weapons, handguns, shotguns, mace, batons, riot helmets, bulletproof vests, and ammunition.

(2) Portable scales—including costs associated with transportation and use of portable scales. Costs for large computer systems are not allowable. (Automatic Data Processing, Main Frame, LAN).

(3) Costs for commercial lease or purchase of vehicle or motorcycles.

(4) Costs of equipment maintenance or repairs of vehicles.

(5) Costs for speed measuring devices—except for enforcement purposes and related project evaluation are not allowable i.e. speed trailers.

(6) Projects related to water, sanitation and waste management.

(7) Projects that include design and planning of construction of facilities.

(8) Projects not utilizing effective strategies based on evidence or best practice.

(9) Projects with an education only activities.

(10) Animal control programs. (11) Tribal employee defensive driving course.

IHS IPP is the lead Federal agency in the development and implementation of AI/AN IPP. IHS is directed to develop, implement, and evaluate IPP that would be successful in reducing American Indian and Alaskan Native morbidity and mortality related to injuries. The purpose of the IHS CA funding is to promote the capacity of Tribes and Tribal/urban/non-profit Indian organizations to build and sustain evidence-based IPP. The Public Health Service (PHS) strongly encourages all contracts to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. Public Law 103– 227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of the facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care of early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the IHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the AI/AN people.

Dated: April 19, 2010. Yvette Roubideaux, Director, Indian Health Service.

[FR Doc. 2010–9502 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4165–16–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES** 

**Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services** 

**[CMS–2300–N]**

**RIN 0938–AP66**

**Medicaid Program; Final FY 2008, Revised Preliminary FY 2009, and**  **Preliminary FY 2010 Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotments and Final FY**  **2008, Revised Preliminary FY 2009, and Preliminary FY 2010**  **Disproportionate Share Hospital Institutions for Mental Disease Limits** 

**AGENCY :**  Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces the final Federal share disproportionate share hospital (DSH) allotments for Federal FY (FY) 2008 and the preliminary Federal share DSH allotments for FY 2010. This notice also announces the final FY 2008 and the preliminary FY 2010 limitations on aggregate DSH payments that States may make to institutions for mental disease and other mental health facilities. This notice also announces the revised preliminary Federal share DSH allotments for FY 2009 and the revised preliminary FY limitations on aggregate DSH payments that States may make to institutions for mental disease and other mental health facilities to reflect the provisions of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act), enacted on February


### 21315 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

17, 2009. This notice also includes background information describing the methodology for determining the amounts of States’ FY DSH allotments.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: This notice is effective June 22, 2010. The final allotments and limitations set forth in this notice are effective for the fiscal year’s specified.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Richard Strauss, (410) 786–2019.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Background A. Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotments for Federal FY 2003

Under section 1923(f)(3) of the Social Security Act (the Act), States’ Federal fiscal year (FY) 2003 disproportionate share hospital (DSH) allotments were calculated by increasing the amounts of the FY 2002 allotments for each State (as specified in the chart, entitled ‘‘DSH Allotment (in millions of dollars) ’’

, contained in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act) by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI–U) for the prior fiscal year. The allotment, determined in this way, is subject to the limitation that an increase to a State’s DSH allotment for a FY cannot result in the DSH allotment exceeding the greater of the State’s DSH allotment for the previous FY or 12 percent of the State’s total medical assistance expenditures for the allotment year (this is referred to as the 12 percent limit).

Most States’ actual FY 2002 allotments were determined in accordance with the provisions of section 1923(f)(4) of the Act which allowed for a special DSH calculation rule for FY 2001 and FY 2002. However, as indicated previously, the calculation of States’ FY 2003 allotments was not based on the actual FY 2002 DSH allotments; rather, section 1923(f)(3) of the Act requires that the States’ FY 2003 allotments be determined using the amount of the States’ FY 2002 allotments specified in the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act. The exception to this is the calculation of the FY 2003 DSH allotments for certain

‘‘ Low-DSH States ’’ (defined in section1923(f)(5) of the Act). Under the LowDSH State provision, there is a specialcalculation methodology for the LowDSH States only. Under this methodology, the FY 2003 allotments were determined by using (that is, increasing) States’ actual FY 2002 DSH allotments (not their FY 2002 allotments specified in the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act) by the percentage change in the CPI–U for the previous fiscal year. B. DSH Allotments for FY 2004 Section 1001(a) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108–173, enacted on December 8, 2003) amended section 1923(f)(3) of the Act to provide for a ‘‘ Special, Temporary Increase In Allotments On A One-Time, Non-Cumulative Basis. ’’ Under this provision, States’ FY 2004 DSH allotments were determined by increasing their FY 2003 allotments by 16 percent, and the FY DSH allotment amounts so determined were not subject to the 12 percent limit. C. DSH Allotments for Non-Low DSH States for FY 2005, and FYs Thereafter

Under the methodology contained in section 1923(f)(3)(C) of the Act, as amended by section 1001(a)(2) of the MMA, the non-Low-DSH States’ DSH allotments for FY 2005 and subsequent FYs continue at the same level as the States’ DSH allotments for FY 2004 until

a ‘‘ fiscal year specified ’’ occurs. The fiscal year specified is the first FY for which the Secretary estimates that a State’s DSH allotment equals (or no longer exceeds) the DSH allotment as would have been determined under the statute in effect before the enactment of the MMA. We determine whether the fiscal year specified has occurred under a special parallel process. Specifically, under this parallel process, a ‘‘ parallel ’’ DSH allotment is determined for FYs after 2003 by increasing the State’s DSH allotment for the previous FY by the percentage change in the CPI–U for the prior FY, subject to the 12 percent limit. This is the methodology as would otherwise have been applied under section 1923(f)(3)(A) of the Act notwithstanding the application of the provisions of MMA. The fiscal year specified, is the FY in which the parallel DSH allotment calculated under this special parallel process finally equals or exceeds the FY 2004 DSH allotment, as determined under the MMA provisions. Once the fiscal year specified occurs for a State, that State’s FY DSH allotment will be calculated by increasing the State’s previous actual FY DSH allotment (which would be equal to the FY 2004 DSH allotment) by the percentage change in the CPI–U for the previous FY, subject to the 12 percent limit. The following example illustrates how the FY DSH allotment would be calculated for FYs after FY 2004.

Example—In this example, we are determining the parallel FY 2009 DSH allotment. A State’s actual FY 2003 DSH allotment is $100 million. Under the MMA, this State’s actual FY 2004 DSH allotment would be $116 million ($100 million increased by 16 percent). The State’s DSH allotment for FY 2005 and subsequent FYs would continue at the $116 million FY 2004 DSH allotment for FYs following FY 2004 until the fiscal year specified occurs. Under the separate parallel process, we determine whether the fiscal year specified has occurred by calculating the State’s DSH allotments in accordance with the statute in effect before the enactment of the MMA. Under this special process, we continue to determine the State’s parallel DSH allotment for each FY by increasing the State’s parallel DSH allotment for the previous FY (as also determined under the special parallel process) by the percentage change in the CPI–U for the previous FY, and subject to the 12 percent limit. Assume for purposes of this example that, in accordance with this special parallel process, the State’s parallel FY 2008 DSH allotment was determined to be $115 million and the percentage change in the CPI–U for FY 2008 (the previous FY) relevant for the calculation of the FY 2009 DSH allotment was 4.4 percent. That is, the percentage change for the CPI–U for FY 2008, the year before FY 2009, was 4.4 percent. Therefore, the State’s special parallel process FY 2009 DSH allotment amount would be calculated by increasing the special parallel process FY 2008 DSH allotment amount of $115 million by 4.4 percent; this results in a parallel process DSH allotment process amount for FY 2009 of $120.06 million. Since $120.06 million is greater than $116 million (the actual FY 2004 DSH allotment calculated under the MMA), we would determine that FY 2009 is the fiscal year specified (the first year that the FY 2004 allotment equals or no longer exceeds the parallel process allotment). Since FY 2009 is the fiscal year specified, we would then determine the State’s FY 2009 allotment by increasing the State’s actual FY 2008 DSH allotment ($116 million) by the percentage change in the CPI–U for FY 2008 (4.4 percent). Therefore, the State’s FY 2009 DSH allotment would be $121.104 million ($116 million increased by 4.4 percent); for purposes of the calculation in this example, the application of the 12 percent limit has no effect. Furthermore, for FY 2009 and thereafter, the State’s DSH allotment would be calculated under the provisions of section 1923(f)(3)(A) of the Act by increasing the State’s previous FY’s DSH allotment by the percentage change in the CPI–U for the previous FY, subject to the 12 percent limit.

However, as amended by section 1001(b)(4) of the MMA, section


### 21316 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act also contains criteria for determining whether a State is a Low-DSH State, beginning with FY 2004. This provision is described in section I.D. D. DSH Allotments for Low-DSH States for FY 2004 and FYs Thereafter Section 1001(b)(1) of the MMA amended section 1923(f)(5) of the Act regarding the calculation of the FY DSH allotments for ‘‘ Low-DSH’’ States for FY 2004 and subsequent fiscal years. Specifically, under section 1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act, as amended by section 1001(b)(4) of the MMA, a State is considered a Low-DSH State for FY 2004 if its total DSH payments under its State plan for FY 2000 (including Federal and State shares) as reported to CMS as of August 31, 2003, are greater than 0 percent and less than 3 percent of the State’s total FY 2000 expenditures under its State plan for medical assistance. For States that meet the new Low-DSH criteria, their FY 2004 DSH allotments are calculated by increasing their FY 2003 DSH allotments by 16percent. Therefore, for FY 2004, LowDSH States’ FY DSH allotments are calculated in the same way as the DSH allotments for regular States, which under section 1923(f)(3) of the Act, get the special temporary increase for FY

2004.

Furthermore, for States meeting the MMA’s Low-DSH definition, the DSH allotments for FYs 2005 through 2008 will continue to be determined by increasing the previous FY’s DSH allotment by 16 percent. The Low-DSH States’ DSH allotments for FYs 2004 through 2008 are not subject to the 12 percent limit. The Low-DSH States’ DSH allotments for FYs 2009 and subsequent FYs are calculated by increasing those States’ DSH allotments for the prior FY by the percentage change in the CPI–U for that prior fiscal year. For FYs 2009 and thereafter, the DSH allotments so determined would be subject to the 12 percent limit. E. Institutions for Mental Diseases DSH Limits for FYs 1998 and Thereafter

Under section 1923(h) of the Act, Federal financial participation (FFP) is not available for DSH payments to institutions for mental diseases (IMDs) and other mental health facilities that are in excess of State-specific aggregate limits. Under this provision, this aggregate limit for DSH payments to IMDs and other mental health facilities is the lesser of a State’s FY 1995 total computable (State and Federal share) IMD and other mental health facility DSH expenditures applicable to the State’s FY 1995 DSH allotment (as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997), or the amount equal to the product of the State’s current year total computable DSH allotment and the applicable percentage.

Each State’s IMD limit on DSH payments to IMDs and other mental health facilities was calculated by first determining the State’s total computable DSH expenditures attributable to the FY 1995 DSH allotment for mental health facilities and inpatient hospitals. This calculation was based on the total computable DSH expenditures reported by the State on the Form CMS–64 as mental health DSH and inpatient hospital as of January 1, 1997. We then calculate an ‘‘ applicable percentage. ’’ The applicable percentage for FY 1998 through FY 2000 (1995 IMD DSH percentage) is calculated by dividing the total computable amount of IMD and mental health DSH expenditures applicable to the State’s FY 1995 DSH allotment by the total computable amount of all DSH expenditures (mental health facility plus inpatient hospital) applicable to the FY 1995 DSH allotment. For FY 2001 and thereafter, the applicable percentage is defined as the lesser of the applicable percentage as calculated above (for FYs 1998 through 2001) or 50 percent for FY 2001; 40 percent for FY 2002; and 33 percent for each subsequent fiscal year.

The applicable percentage is then applied to each State’s total computable FY DSH allotment for the current fiscal year. The State’s total computable FY DSH allotment is calculated by dividing the State’s Federal share DSH allotment for the FY by the State’s Federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) for that fiscal year.

In the final step of the calculation of the IMD DSH Limit, the State’s total computable IMD DSH limit for the FY is set at the lesser of the product of a State’s current FY total computable DSH allotment and the applicable percentage for that FY, or the State’s FY 1995 total computable IMD and other mental health facility DSH expenditures applicable to the State’s FY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on the Form CMS–64.

The MMA legislation did not amend the Medicaid statute with respect to the calculation of the IMD DSH limit.

F. Publication in the Federal Register of Preliminary and Final Notice for DSH Allotments and IMD DSH Limits

In general, we initially determine States’ DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits for a FY using estimates of medical assistance expenditures, including DSH expenditures in their Medicaid programs. These estimates are provided by States each year on the August quarterly Medicaid budget reports (Form CMS–37) before the FY for which the DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits are being determined. Also, as part of the basic determination of preliminary DSH allotments for a FY we use the available CPI–U percentage increase that is available before the beginning of the FY for which the allotment is being determined to determine such preliminary FY DSH allotment. For example, in determining the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotment, we would apply the CPI–U percentage increase for FY 2008 that was available just before the beginning of FY 2009 on October 1, 2008.

The DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits determined using these estimates and CPI–U percentage increases available before the beginning of the FY are referred to as ‘‘ preliminary. ’’ Only after we receive States’ reports of the actual medical assistance expenditures through the quarterly expenditure report (Form CMS–64), and the final historic CPI–U percentage increases for the prior FY, which occurs after the end of the FY, are the ‘‘ final ’’ DSH Allotments and IMD DSH limits determined.

The notice published in the Federal Register on December 28, 2007 (72 FR 73831), included the announcement of the preliminary FY 2008 DSH allotments (based on estimates), and the preliminary FY 2008 IMD DSH limits (since they were based on the preliminary DSH allotments for FY 2008). The notice published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2008 (73 FR 77704) and the correction notice published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4439) announced the final FY 2007 DSH allotments and the final FY 2007 IMD DSH limits (since they were based on the actual expenditures for years), and the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments (based on estimates and CPI–U percentage increases for FY 2008 available prior to the beginning of FY 2009), and the preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH limits (since they were based on the preliminary DSH allotments for FY 2009).

This notice announces the final FY 2008 DSH allotments and the final FY 2008 IMD DSH limits (since these are now based on the actual expenditures for that FY), the preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotments (based on expenditure estimates), and the preliminary IMD DSH limits for FY 2010 (since they are based on the preliminary DSH allotments for FY 2010). This notice does not include the final FY 2009 DSH allotments or the final FY 2009 IMD DSH limits, since the actual


### 21317 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

expenditures for FY 2009 are not available at this time.

However, this notice also announces revised preliminary FY 2009 DSH Allotments and revised preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH limits determined in accordance with the provisions of section 5002 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act, Pub. L. 111–5) enacted on February 17, 2009, and the final historic CPI–U percentage increase for FY 2008. This DSH provision of the Recovery Act is described in section H below. G. DSH Allotment Provisions for Certain States

1. DSH Allotments for the State of Tennessee

Section 1923(f)(6)(A) of the Act, as amended by section 404 of Public Law 109–432 (enacted on December 20, 2006), section 204 of Public Law 110– 173 (enacted on December 29, 2007), section 202 of Public Law 110–275 (enacted on July 15, 2008), and most recently section 616 of Public Law 111– 3 (enacted on February 4, 2009) provides for the determination of a DSH allotment for the State of Tennessee for each of FYs 2007 through FY 2011, and for a period in FY 2012. In accordance with this provision, Tennessee’s DSH allotment for each of these FYs is the greater of $280 million and the FY 2007 Federal medical assistance percentage of the DSH payment adjustments reflected in the State’s TennCare Demonstration Project for the demonstration year ending in 2006. In accordance with this provision, the State’s Federal share DSH allotment for each of FYs 2007 through FY 2011 is $305,451,928. Furthermore, Tennessee’s DSH allotment for the period October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the first quarter of FY 2012) is one-fourth of this amount; that is, $76,362,982. Section 1923(f)(6)(A)(ii) of the Act further limits the amount of Federal funds that are available for DSH payments that Tennessee may make in each FY to 30 percent of the DSH allotment. In this regard, the limit on the DSH payments that the State of Tennessee may make is effectively $91,635,578 (30 percent of $305,451,928) for each FY 2007 through FY 2011, and $22,908,895 (30 percent of $76,362,982) for the period October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011.

2. DSH Allotments for the State of Hawaii

Section 1923(f)(6)(B) of the Act, as amended by section 404 of Public Law 109–432, section 204 of Public Law 110–173, section 202 of Public Law 110–275, and most recently section 616 of Public Law 111–3 (enacted on February 4, 2009) provides for a DSH allotment for the State of Hawaii for each of FYs 2007 through FY 2011, and for a period in FY 2012. In accordance with this provision, Hawaii’s DSH allotment for FY 2007 through FY 2011 is $10 million. Furthermore, Hawaii’s DSH allotment for the period October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 (the first quarter of FY 2012) is $2.5 million. H. DSH Allotments for FY 2009 and FY 2010 Under the Recovery Act

Section 5002 of the Recovery Act added a new section 1923(f)(3)(E) of the Act; this new section provides for a temporary increase in States’ DSH allotments for FY 2009 and FY 2010. 1. Revised Preliminary DSH Allotments for FY 2009

As indicated above, States’ preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments were previously published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2009. However, section 5002 of the Recovery Act enacted after the publication of the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments provided for an increase in States’ DSH allotments from what were previously determined and published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2009. The Recovery Act provided fiscal relief to States during the recent national economic downturn. In that regard, section 1923(f)(3)(E)(i)(I) of the Act, as created by section 5002 of the Recovery Act, requires that in general States’ DSH allotments for FY 2009 be equal to 102.5 percent of the FY 2009 allotments that would otherwise have been determined; this provision does not apply to certain States as discussed in section G. above.

As described in section F above, we typically publish States’ preliminary DSH allotments based on expenditure estimates and CPI–U percentage increases available before the FY for which the preliminary DSH allotment is being determined. The preliminary DSH allotments are subsequently finalized after the FY is over and when the applicable inputs for determining the DSH allotments (that is, the applicable expenditures and the CPI–U percentage increase for the previous FY) are final.

Due to the Recovery Act temporary increase for FY 2009, in this notice, we are announcing a revision to the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments previously published to reflect updated States’ expenditures, and more significantly, to reflect an updated and increased CPI–U percentage increase. As described above, States’ DSH allotments are determined by increasing the previous FY allotment by the applicable CPI–U percentage increase. In particular, when we previously calculated the preliminary FY 2009 allotments, the applicable CPI–U percentage increase for FY 2008 (used for determining the FY 2009 DSH allotment) which was available before the beginning of FY 2009 was 4.0 percent. However, subsequent to our initial determination of the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments, the historical applicable CPI–U percentage increase for FY 2008 became available; that actual CPI–U increase for FY 2008 is 4.4 percent. In order to ensure that the full increase in DSH allotments for FY 2009 is available to States during FY 2009, we revised the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments prior to the end of FY 2009 to reflect both the updated increase in the applicable CPI–U percentage increase for FY 2008 and the 2.5 percent increase in States’ FY 2009 DSH allotments as required under the Recovery Act.

We note that section 5001 of the Recovery Act provided for the Federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) for each State to be increased during the

‘‘Recession Adjustment Period ’’ specified in such section. As referenced in this notice and in the included charts, the FMAP is a factor in the methodology for determining States’ fiscal year DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits. However, section 5001(e) of the Recovery Act specifically precludes the use of the Recovery Act increased FMAP with respect to the determination of DSH payments. Therefore, the regular FMAP is used in the calculation of the fiscal year DSH allotments and the IMD DSH limits. 2. Preliminary DSH Allotments for FY

2010

Sections 1923(f)(3)(E)(i)(II) and (ii) of the Act, as amended by Section 5002 of the Recovery Act, provide that the FY 2010 DSH allotment for a State is determined as the higher of:

• 102.5 percent of the DSH allotment for FY 2009, as determined under the Recovery Act provision, or

• The FY 2010 DSH allotment as would otherwise be calculated without the application of the Recovery Act provision (using the preliminary applicable percentage increase in the CPI–U for FY 2009 (the preceding fiscal year) that was available at the beginning of FY 2010).

In accordance with the Recovery Act provision, we have determined the preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotments for most States as 102.5 percent of the DSH allotments for FY 2009, as determined under the Recovery Act. The exception is that this provision does not apply for the States described in section G above.


### 21318 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

3. Determination of FY DSH Allotments for FYs After FY 2010

Under section 1923(f)(3)(E)(i)(III) of the Act, as amended by the Recovery Act, for FYs after FY 2010, the States’ DSH allotments are determined as previously calculated under the statute before the enactment of the Recovery Act. 4. Effect of the Recovery Act DSH Provision on Calculation of the States’ IMD DSH Limits for FY 2009 and FY

2010

Section E above described the determination of States’ IMD DSH limits for FYs beginning FY 1998 and after, as determined under section 1923(h) of the Act. Section 5002 of the Recovery Act did not amend section 1923(h) of the Act. Accordingly, States’ IMD DSH limits for FY 2009 and FY 2010, the FYs for which the Recovery Act provisions are applicable, are determined as under the existing provisions. As described in section E above, States’ DSH allotments are an element of the determination of the IMD DSH limit; therefore, the DSH allotments for FY 2009 and FY 2010, as determined under the Recovery Act provisions, would be used in calculating States’ FY 2009 and FY 2010 IMD DSH limits in the same way as the DSH allotments were applied under section 1923(h) of the Act regardless of the Recovery Act provision.

II. Provisions of the Notice A. Calculation of the Final FY 2008 Federal Share State DSH Allotments, the Revised Preliminary FY 2009 State DSH Allotments, and the Preliminary FY 2010 Federal Share State DSH Allotments

1. Final FY 2008 Federal Share State DSH Allotments

Chart 1 of the Addendum to this notice provides the States’ ‘‘ final ’’ FY 2008 DSH allotments. The final FY 2008 DSH allotments for each State were computed in accordance with the provisions of the Medicaid statute as amended by the MMA. As required by the provisions of the MMA, the final FY 2004 DSH allotments for the ‘‘ Low-DSH ’’ States and all the other States were calculated by increasing the FY 2003 DSH allotments by 16 percent. In the March 26, 2004 notice published in the Federal Register (69 FR 15850), we explained the definition and determination of the ‘‘ Low-DSH ’’ States under the MMA provisions. However, for following FYs, the DSH allotments are determined under a process which incorporates the ‘‘ parallel process ’’ described in the above section I.C of this notice. Under that parallel process, States’ final FY 2008 DSH allotments were determined using the States’ actual FY 2008 expenditures as reported by States (on Form CMS–64).

2. Revised Calculation of the States’ Preliminary FY 2009 Federal Share State DSH Allotments

Chart 2 of the Addendum to this notice provides the States’ revised

‘‘ preliminary’’ FY 2009 DSH allotments as discussed above in section I.H.1 of this notice.

As discussed in section I.C and I.F of this notice, the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments were previously published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2009. As described above and in the previous Federal Register notice in determining non-Low DSH States’ DSH allotments for FYs after FY 2004 under section 1923(f)(3)(C) of the Act for DSH allotments, we determined States’ DSH allotments under a

‘‘ parallel ’’ process. Under the parallel process, for each FY for each State, we have been determining whether the fiscal year specified (as defined in section 1923(f)(3)(D) of the Act) has occurred. Under section 1923(f)(3)(D) of the Act, the fiscal year specified is determined separately for each State and ‘‘ is the first FY for which the Secretary estimates that the DSH allotment for that State will equal (or no longer exceed) the DSH allotment for that State under the law as in effect before the date of enactment’’ of MMA. The process in effect before the enactment in MMA is the process described in section 1923(f)(3)(A) of the Act; under this process each States’ DSH allotment since FY 2003 is increased by the CPI–U increase for the prior FY and the result is then compared to the State’s FY 2004 DSH allotment, as determined under section 1923(f)(3)(C)(i) of the Act (under which the States’ FY 2003 DSH allotments were increased by 16 percent). In other words, the fiscal year specified for a State is the FY when the FY 2004 allotment is no longer greater than the parallel process DSH allotment.

We are reiterating the parallel process provision because for all non-Low DSH States (except Louisiana), we have determined that FY 2009 is the fiscal year specified. Therefore, as indicated in section 1923(f)(3)(C)(ii) of the Act, the FY 2009 DSH allotment for all non-Low DSH States (except Louisiana) is equal to the prior FY 2008 DSH allotment increased by the CPI–U increase for FY 2008 (4.4 percent). Chart 2 illustrates the revised preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments. For the non-Low DSH States for which the FY 2009 is the fiscal year specified, the FY 2010 and subsequent FY DSH allotments will be calculated by increasing the prior FY DSH allotment by the CPI–U increase for the prior fiscal

year.

For Low-DSH States, the FY 2009 DSH allotment is calculated using the same methodology as for the non-Low DSH States for which the fiscal year specified has occurred. That is, for FY 2009 and following FYs, the DSH allotment for Low-DSH States is calculated by increasing the prior FY DSH allotment by the percentage change in the CPI–U for the prior fiscal year.

The preliminary FY 2009 allotments were initially determined using the States’ August 2008 expenditure estimates submitted by the States on the Form CMS–37, and the percentage increase in the CPI–U for the previous FY that was available before the beginning of FY 2009. As discussed in section I.H.1 above, based on the updated CPI–U percentage increase for FY 2008 (from 4.0 percent to 4.4 percent), and the enactment of section 5002 of the Recovery Act (which provides that States’ FY 2009 DSH allotments are equal to 102.5 percent of such allotments as would otherwise be determined for such FY), we are revising the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments in this notice from what was previously published in the Federal Register correction notice on January 26, 2009.

States’ final FY 2009 DSH allotments will be published in the Federal Register following receipt of the States’ four quarterly Medicaid expenditure reports (Form CMS–64) for FY 2009 following the end of FY 2009. 3. Calculation of the Preliminary FY 2010 Federal Share State DSH Allotments

Chart 3 of the Addendum to this notice provides the preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotments determined in accordance with the Recovery Act provisions discussed above in section I.H.2 of this notice. States’ final FY 2010 DSH allotments will be published in the Federal Register following receipt of the States’ four quarterly Medicaid expenditure reports (Form CMS–64) for FY 2010 following the end of FY 2010. B. Calculation of the Final FY 2008, Revised Preliminary FY 2009, and Preliminary FY 2010 IMD DSH Limits

As discussed in section I.E. and I.H.4 above of this notice, section 1923(h) of the Act specifies the methodology to be used to establish the limits on the amount of DSH payments that a State can make to IMDs and other mental health facilities. FFP is not available for


### 21319 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

IMD or DSH payments that exceed such IMD limits. In this notice, we are publishing the final FY 2008 IMD DSH Limit, the revised preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH Limit, and the preliminary FY 2010 IMD DSH Limit determined in accordance with the provisions discussed above, and for FY 2009 and FY 2010, reflecting the DSH allotments for such FYs determined under the provisions of section 5002 of the Recovery Act.

Charts 4, 5, and 6 of the Addendum to this notice detail each State’s final IMD DSH Limit for FY 2008, revised preliminary IMD DSH Limit for FY 2009, and the preliminary IMD DSH Limit for FY 2010, respectively, determined in accordance with section 1923(h) of the Act.

III. Collection of Information Requirements

This document does not impose information collection and recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35). IV. Regulatory Impact Statement

We have examined the impact of this rule as required by Executive Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96–354), section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), and Executive Order 13132.

Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). This notice does reach the economic threshold and thus is considered a major rule.

There are no changes between the preliminary and final FY 2008 DSH allotments and FY 2008 IMD DSH limits. This is because FY 2008 was not determined to be the fiscal year specified for any State. That is, only substantive changes related to the CPI–U or the States’ Medicaid expenditures that would affect the determination of the fiscal year specified would have resulted in a change between the preliminary and final DSH allotments and IMD limits for FY 2008.

The revised preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments published in this notice are about $308 million greater than the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments published in the Federal Register correction notice on January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4439). As discussed previously, this occurred because of the application of a higher CPI–U (4.4 percent in the revised preliminary determination compared to 4.0 percent in the original preliminary determination) and the application of the Recovery Act increase to States’ DSH allotments for FY 2009.

The revised preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH Limits being published in this notice are about $22 million greater than the preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH limits published in the Federal Register notice on December 19, 2008 (73 FR 77704). This is because the DSH allotment for a FY is a factor in the determination of the IMD DSH limit for the FY, and since the original preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments were increased in the revised preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments, the IMD DSH limits for some States were also increased.

The preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotments being published in this notice are about $277 million greater than the revised preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments being published in this notice and about $585 million greater than the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments published in the Federal Register correction notice on January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4439). These increases are a direct result of the application of the Recovery Act provisions which in this case resulted in the FY 2010 DSH allotments being determined as 2.5 percent greater than the FY 2009 DSH allotments as determined under the Recovery Act.

The preliminary FY 2010 IMD DSH Limits being published in this notice are about $21 million greater than the revised preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH Limits being published in this notice, and about $43 million greater than the preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH limits published in the Federal Register notice on December 19, 2008 (73 FR 77704). This is because the DSH allotment for a FY is a factor in the determination of the IMD DSH limit for the FY, and since the preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotments were increased as compared to the preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments, the associated FY 2010 IMD DSH limits for some States were also increased.

The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $6.5 million to $31.5 million in any one year. Individuals and States are not included in the definition of a small entity. We are not preparing an analysis for the RFA because we have determined, and the Secretary certifies, that this notice will not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Specifically, the effects of the various controlling statutes on providers are not impacted by a result of any independent regulatory impact and not this notice. The purpose of the notice is to announce the latest distributions as required by the statute.

In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Core-Based Statistical Area for Medicaid payment regulations and has fewer than 100 beds. We are not preparing analysis for section 1102(b) of the Act because we have determined and the Secretary certifies that this notice will not have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals.

The Medicaid statute (including as most recently amended by the Recovery Act) specifies the methodology for determining the amounts of States’ DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits; and as described previously, results in increases in States’ DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits for the FYs referred to. The statute applicable to these allotments and limits does not apply to the determination of the amounts of DSH payments made to specific DSH hospitals; rather, these allotments and limits represent an overall limit on the total of such DSH payments. In this regard, we do not believe that this notice will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. That threshold level is currently approximately $133 million. This notice will have no consequential effect on


### 21320 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

State, local, or tribal governments or on the private sector.

Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. Since this notice does not impose any costs on State or local governments, the requirements of E.O. 13132 are not applicable.
Accounting Statement

As required by OMB Circular A–4 (available at http:// www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/ a004/a-4.pdf ), in the table below, we have prepared an accounting statement showing the classification of the estimated expenditures associated with the provisions of this notice. This table provides our best estimate of the increase in the Federal share of States’ Medicaid DSH payments resulting from the application of the provisions of the Medicaid statute relating to the calculation of States’ FY DSH allotments and the increase in such FY DSH allotments from FY 2008 to FY 2009.



### TABLE

### —A CCOUNTING 

### S TATEMENT 

### : C LASSIFICATION OF 

### E STIMATED 

### E X



### PENDITURES 

### , F ROM THE 

### FY 20XX

TO 

### FY 2010

[In millions]

Category Transfers

Annualized Monetized

Transfers. $33,713. 

### TABLE

### —A CCOUNTING 

### S TATEMENT 

### : C LASSIFICATION OF 

### E STIMATED 

### E X



### PENDITURES 

### , F ROM THE 

### FY 20XX

TO 

### FY 2010—Continued

[In millions]

Category Transfers

From Whom To

Whom? Federal Government to States.

In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.

Addendum

This addendum contains the charts 1 through 4 (preceded by associated keys) that are referred to in the preamble of this notice.



### K EY TO 

### C HART 

### 1—F INAL 

### DSH A LLOTMENTS FOR 

### FY 2008
[Key to the Chart of the Final FY 2008 DSH Allotments. The final FY 2008 DSH Allotments for the regular States are presented in the top section of this chart and the final FY 2008 DSH Allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart]

Column Description

**For Non-Low-DSH States**

Column A ............... State. Column B ............... Final FY 2004 DSH Allotments—This column contains the final Federal share FY 2004 DSH Allotments. Column C ............... FY 2008 DSH Allotments—This column contains the final Federal share FY 2008 DSH Allotments.

**For Low-DSH States**

Column A ............... State. Column B ............... Prior FY DSH Allotments (FY 2007)—This column contains the final FY 2007 DSH Allotments. Column C ............... FY 2008 DSH Allotments—This column contains the final Federal share FY 2008 DSH Allotments = Column B mu ltiplied by 1.16.

Key to Chart 2. Preliminary DSH Allotments for FY 2009.



### K EY TO 

### C HART 

### 2—R EVISED 

### P RELIMINARY 

### DSH A LLOTMENTS FOR 

### FY 2009
[The Revised Preliminary FY 2009 DSH Allotments for the NON–Low DSH States are presented in the top section of this chart, and the Revised Preliminary FY 2009 DSH Allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of this chart]

Column Description

Column A .......... State. Column B .......... 1923(f)(3)(D) Test Met. This column indicates whether the ‘‘ FY Specified ’’ has occurred with respect to Non-Low-DSH States, determined in accordance with section 1923(f)(3)(D) of the Act. ‘‘YES ’’ indicates the FY Specified has occurred; ‘‘ NOT MET’’ indicates that the FY Specified has not occurred; and ‘‘ na ’’ indicates that this provision is not applicable. This provision is not applicable for Low-DSH States indicated in the bottom portion of chart 2. Columns C–L .... For all States, the entries in Columns C through K present the determination of the revised preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments as would be calculated without the application of section 5002 of ARRA. For all States, the entries in Column L present the calculation of the revised preliminary FY 2009 DSH Allotments, determined in accordance with the provisions of section 5002 of ARRA. For Non-Low-DSH States indicated in the top portion of Chart 2, entries in Columns C through K are only for States meeting

the ‘‘ FY Specified ’’ test ( ‘‘YES ’’ in Column B). For States not meeting the test indicated in Column B, these columns indicate ‘‘ NA’’ , and for States for which such test is not applicable, these columns indicate ‘‘ na ’’ . For Low-DSH States, entries are in the bottom portion of Chart 2. Column C ......... FY 2009 FMAPS. This column contains the States’ FY 2009 Federal Medical Assistance Percentages. Column D ......... FY 2008 DSH Allotments For States Meeting Test. This column contains the States’ prior FY 2008 DSH Allotments. Column E .......... FY 2008 Allotments × (1 + Percentage Increase in CPI–U): 1.044. This column contains the amount in Column D increased by 1 plus the percentage increase in the CPI–U for the prior FY (4.4 percent). Column F .......... FY 2009 TC MAP Including DSH. This column contains the amount of the States’ projected FY 2009 total computab le medical assistance expenditures including DSH expenditures.


### 21321 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

K EY TO 

### C HART 

### 2—R EVISED 

### P RELIMINARY 

### DSH A LLOTMENTS FOR 

### FY 2009—Continued
[The Revised Preliminary FY 2009 DSH Allotments for the NON–Low DSH States are presented in the top section of this chart, and the Revised Preliminary FY 2009 DSH Allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of this chart]

Column Description

Column G ......... FY 2009 TC DSH Expenditures. This column contains the amount of the States’ projected FY 2009 total computableDSH expenditures. Column H ......... FY 2009 TC MAP Exp. Net of DSH. This column contains the amount of the States’ projected FY 2009 total computa ble medical assistance expenditures net of DSH expenditures, calculated as the amount in Column F minus the amount in Column G. Column I ........... 12% AMOUNT. This column contains the amount of the ‘‘ 12 percent limit’’ in Federal share, determined in accordance with the provisions of section 1923(f)(3) of the Act. Column J .......... Greater of FY 2008 Allotment or 12% Limit. This column contains the greater of the State’s prior FY (FY 2008) DSH allotment or the amount of the 12% Limit, determined as the maximum of the amount in Column D or Column I. Column K .......... FY 2009 DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ FY 2009 DSH allotments, determined as the minimum of the amount in Column J or Column E. For Non-Low DSH States that have not met the ‘‘ FY Specified ’’ test (entry in Column B is ‘‘ NOT MET’’ ), the amount in Column K is equal to the State’s FY 2004 DSH allotment. For States for which the entry in Column B is ‘‘ na ’’ , the amount in Column K is determined in accordance with the provisions of section 1923(f)(6) of the Act. Column L .......... FY 2009 DSH Allotment Under ARRA. This column contains the State’s FY 2009 DSH allotment as determined in acc ordance with section 5002 of ARRA, and calculated as the amount in Column K multiplied by 102.5 percent.

Key to Chart 3. Preliminary DSH Allotments for FY 2010.



### K EY TO 

### C HART 

### 3—P RELIMINARY 

### DSH A LLOTMENTS FOR 

### FY 2010

[The Preliminary FY 2010 DSH Allotments for the NON–Low DSH States are presented in the top section of this chart, and the Prel iminary FY 2010 DSH Allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of this chart]

Column Description

Column A ............... State. Column B ............... 1923(f)(3)(D) Test Met. This column indicates whether the ‘‘ FY Specified ’’ has occurred with respect to Non-Low DSH States, determined in accordance with section 1923(f)(3)(D) of the Act. ‘‘YES ’’ indicates the FY Specified has occurred;

‘‘ NOT MET’’ indicates that the FY Specified has not occurred; and ‘‘ na ’’ indicates that this provision is not applicable. This provision is not applicable for Low-DSH States indicated in the bottom portion of chart 3. Columns C–N ........ For all States, the entries in Columns B through K present the determination of the preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotments as would be calculated without the application of section 5002 of ARRA. For all States, the entries in Columns L through N present the calculation of the preliminary FY 2010 DSH Allotments, determined in accordance with the provisions of section 5002 of ARRA.For Non-Low DSH States indicated in the top portion of Chart 3, entries in Columns C through K are only for States meeting the ‘‘ FY Specified ’’ test ( ‘‘YES ’’ in Column B). For States not meeting the test indicated in Column B, these Columns indicate ‘‘ NA’’ , and for States for which such test is not applicable, these Columns indicate ‘‘ na ’’ . For Low DSH States, entries are in the bottom portion of Chart 3. Column C ............... FY 2010 FMAPS. This column contains the States’ FY 2010 Federal Medical Assistance Percentages. Column D ............... FY 2009 DSH Allotments For States Meeting Test. This column contains the States’ prior FY 2009 DSH Allot ments as would be determined without the application of section 5002 of ARRA. Column E ............... FY 2009 Allotments X (1 + Percentage Increase in CPI–U): 1.00. This column contains the amount in Column D increased by 1 plus the percentage increase in the CPI–U for the prior FY (0.0 percent). Column F ............... FY 2010 TC MAP Including DSH. This column contains the amount of the States’ projected FY 2010 total com putable medical assistance expenditures including DSH expenditures. Column G ............... FY 2010 TC DSH Expenditures. This column contains the amount of the States’ projected FY 2010 total comp utable DSH expenditures. Column H ............... FY 2010 TC MAP Exp. Net of DSH. This column contains the amount of the States’ projected FY 2010 total c omputable medical assistance expenditures net of DSH expenditures, calculated as the amount in Column F minus the amount in Column G. Column I ................ 12% AMOUNT. This column contains the amount of the ‘‘ 12 percent limit’’ in Federal share, determined in accordance with the provisions of section 1923(f)(3) of the Act. Column J ................ Greater of FY 2009 Allotment or 12% Limit. This column contains the greater of the State’s prior FY (FY2009) DSH allotment or the amount of the 12% Limit, determined as the maximum of the amount in Column D or Column I. Column K ............... FY 2010 DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ FY 2010 DSH allotments as would be determined wi thout theapplication of the provisions of section 5002 of ARRA, determined as the minimum of the amount in Column J or Column E. For Non-Low DSH States that have not met the ‘‘ FY Specified ’’ test (entry in Column B is ‘‘ NOT MET’’ ), the amount in Column K is equal to the State’s FY 2004 DSH allotment. For States for which the entry in Column B is ‘‘ na ’’

, the amount in Column K is determined in accordance with the provisions of section 1923(f)(6) of the Act. Column L ............... FY 2009 DSH Allotment Under ARRA. This column contains the State’s FY 2009 revised preliminary DSH allot ment as determined under section 5002 of ARRA. Column M .............. FY 2010 DSH Allotment Under ARRA. This column contains the State’s FY 2010 DSH allotment as determined in accordance with section 5002 of ARRA, and calculated as the amount in Column L multiplied by 102.5 percent. Column N ............... FY 2010 DSH Allotment. This column contains the preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotment determined as the high er of the amount in Column K (the preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotment as determined without the application of section 5002 of ARRA) and the amount in Column M (102.5 percent of the amount of the State’s FY 2009 DSH allotment determined in accordance with section 5002 of ARRA.


### 21322 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

K EY TO 

### C HART 

### 4—F INAL 

### IMD DSH LIMT FOR 

### FY 2008
[Key to the Chart of the Final FY 2008 IMD Limitations—The Final FY 2008 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top section of this chart and the final FY IMD DSH Limits for the Low DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart]

Column Description

Column A ............... State. Column B ............... Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the States’ total computabl e FY 1995 inpatient hospital DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64. Column C ............... IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the total computable FY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997. Column D ............... Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable, Col B + C. This column contains the total computation of all inpatient hospital DSH expenditures and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FY 1995 as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997 (representing the sum of Column B and Column C). Column E ............... Applicable Percentage Col C/D. This column contains the ‘‘ applicable percentage ’’ representing the total computable FY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures divided by total computable all inpatient hospital and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FY 1995 (the amount in Column C divided by the amount in Column D). Per section 1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act, for FYs after FY 2002, the applicable percentage can be no greater than 33 percent. Column F ............... FY 2008 Allotment In FS. This column contains the States’ final FY 2008 DSH allotments. Column G ............... FY 2008 FMAP. This column contains the States’ FY 2008 FMAPs. Column H ............... FY 2008 DSH Allotments in TC. Col. F/G. This column contains the FY 2008 total computable DSH Allotment (determined as the amount in Column F divided by the amount in Column G). Column I ................ Col E * Col H in TC. This column contains the applicable percent of FY 2008 total computable DSH allotm ent (calculated as the amount in Column E multiplied by the amount in Column H). Column J ................ FY 2008 IMD DSH Limit Total Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I. The column contains the lesser of the am ount in Column C or Column I. Column K ............... FY 2008 IMD DSH Limit in Federal Share, Col. G x J. This column contains the total computable IMD DSH Li mit from Col. J and converts that amount into a Federal share (calculated as Col. G x Col. J).



### K EY TO 

### C HART 

### 5—R EVISED 

### P RELIMINARY 

### IMD DSH L IMIT 

### U NDER 

### ARRA FOR 

### FY 2009
[Key to the Chart of the Revised FY 2009 IMD Limitations—The revised preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH Limits for the Non-Low DSH States are presented in the top section of this chart and the revised preliminary FY 2009 IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presen ted in the bottom section of the chart]

Column Description

Column A ............... State. Column B ............... Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the States’ total computabl e FY 1995 inpatient hospital DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64. Column C ............... IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the total computable FY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997. Column D ............... Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable, Col. B + C. This column contains the t otal computation of all inpatient hospital DSH expenditures and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FY 1995 as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997 (representing the sum of Column B and Column C). Column E ............... Applicable Percent Col. C/D. This column contains the ‘‘ applicable percentage ’’ representing the total Computable FY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures divided by total computable all inpatient hospital and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FY 1995 (the amount in Column C divided by the amount in Column D) Per section 1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act, for FYs after FY 2002, the applicable Percentage can be no greater than 33 percent. Column F ............... FY 2009 Federal Share DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ preliminary FY 2009 DSH allotments

. Column G ............... FY 2009 FMAP. This columns contains the States’ FY 2009 FMAPs. Column H ............... FY 2009 DSH Allotments in Total Computable Col. F/G. This column contains States’ FY 2009 total computab le DSH allotment (determined as Column F/Column G). Column I ................ Col E * Col H in TC. This column contains the applicable percent of FY 2009 total computable DSH allotm ent (calculated as the percentage in Column E multiplied by the amount in Column H). Column J ................ FY 2009 IMD DSH Limit Total Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I. The column contains the lesser of the le sser of Column I or C. Column K ............... FY 2009 IMD DSH Limit in Federal Share, Col. G × J. This column contains the total computable IMD DSH Limit from Col. J and converts that amount into a Federal share (calculated as the amount in Column G multiplied by the amount in Column J).



### K EY TO 

### C HART 

### 6—P RELIMINARY 

### IMD DSH L IMIT 

### U NDER 

### ARRA FOR 

### FY 2010
[Key to the Chart of the FY 2010 IMD Limitations.—The preliminary FY 2010 IMD DSH Limits for the Non-Low DSH States are present ed in the top section of this chart and the preliminary FY 2010 IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart]

Column Description

Column A ............... State. Column B ............... Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the States’ total computabl e FY 1995 inpatient hospital DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64. Column C ............... IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the total computable FY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997.


### 21323 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

K EY TO 

### C HART 

### 6—P RELIMINARY 

### IMD DSH L IMIT 

### U NDER 

### ARRA FOR 

### FY 2010—Continued
[Key to the Chart of the FY 2010 IMD Limitations.—The preliminary FY 2010 IMD DSH Limits for the Non-Low DSH States are present ed in the top section of this chart and the preliminary FY 2010 IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of the chart]

Column Description

Column D ............... Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable, Col. B + C. This column contains the t otal computation of all inpatient hospital DSH expenditures and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FY 1995 as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997 (representing the sum of Column B and Column C). Column E ............... Applicable Percent Col. C/D. This column contains the ‘‘ applicable percentage ’’ representing the total Computable FY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures divided by total computable all inpatient hospital and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FY 1995 (the amount in Column C divided by the amount in Column D) Per section 1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) Of the Act, for FYs after FY 2002, the applicable Percentage can be no greater than 33 percent. Column F ............... FY 2010 Federal Share DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ preliminary FY 2010 DSH allotments

. Column G ............... FY 2010 FMAP. This columns contains the States’ FY 2010 FMAPs. Column H ............... FY 2010 DSH Allotments in Total Computable Col. F/G. This column contains States’ FY 2010 total computab le DSH allotment (determined as Column F/Column G). Column I ................ Col E * Col H in TC. This column contains the applicable percent of FY 2010 total computable DSH allotm ent (calculated as the percentage in Column E multiplied by the amount in Column H) Column J ................ FY 2010 IMD DSH Limit Total Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I. The column contains the lesser of the le sser of Column I or C. Column K ............... FY 2010 IMD DSH Limit in Federal Share, Col. G x J. This column contains the total computable IMD DSH Li mit from Col. J and converts that amount into a Federal share (calculated as the amount in Column G multiplied by the amount in Column J).

**BILLING CODE 4120–01–P**


### 21324 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices


### 21325 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices


### 21326 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices


### 21327 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices


### 21328 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices


### 21329 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance Program)

Dated: December 17, 2009. Charlene Frizerra, Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Dated: February 22, 2010. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010–8502 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4120–01–C DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND**  **HUMAN SERVICES**

**Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services** 

**[CMS–2309–N]**

**RIN 0938–AP90**

**Medicaid Program; State Allotments for Payment of Medicare Part B**  **Premiums for Qualifying Individuals: Federal Fiscal Year 2009 and Federal**  **Fiscal Year 2010**

**AGENCY :**  Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice sets forth final allotments available to States to pay the Medicare Part B premiums for Qualifying Individuals (QIs) for the Federal fiscal year (FY) 2009 and the preliminary QI allotments for FY 2010. The amounts of these QI allotments were determined in accordance with the methodology set forth in regulations, as amended in the Federal Register published on November 24, 2008, and reflect funding for the QI program made available under recent legislation.

**DATES :**  Effective dates: The final QI allotments for payment of Medicare Part B premiums for FY 2009 are effective October 1, 2008. The preliminary QI allotments for FY 2010 are effective October 1, 2009.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Richard Strauss, (410) 786–2019.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Background A. History of the QI Program

Section 1902 of the Social Security Act (the Act) sets forth the requirements for State plans for medical assistance. Before August 5, 1997, section 1902(a)(10)(E) of the Act specified that State Medicaid plans must provide forsome or all types of Medicare costsharing for three eligibility groups of low-income Medicare beneficiaries. These three groups included qualified Medicare beneficiaries (QMBs), specified low-income Medicare