alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JORGE CRUZ-VIZCARRA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30346

D.C. No. 1:12-cr-00043-EJL-2

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 4, 2014** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Notwithstanding his waiver of his right to appeal, Cruz-Vizcarra attempts to

appeal his sentence of 322 months imposed pursuant to his plea of guilty. He

pleaded guilty to two felony counts involving controlled substances: possession of

FILED

MAR 06 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
methamphetamine with the intent to distribute, and possession of a firearm in

furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime.

Cruz-Vizcarra alleges that, during his Rule 11 guilty-plea colloquy, the

district court failed “to accurately inform [him], or determine that he understood,

the [applicable] mandatory minimum sentence” he was facing. Thus, he says, his

plea colloquy was fatally defective, and therefore so were his plea and appellate

waiver.

Cruz-Vizcarra did not object to this alleged lapse. Thus, we review for plain

error. United States v. Monzon, 429 F.3d 1268, 1271 (9th Cir. 2005).

Even if we were to conclude that the court’s language (1) was error and, (2)

that the error was plain, we conclude nevertheless that it did not (1) affect CruzVizcarra’s substantive rights, or (2) seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public

reputation of judicial proceedings. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732

(1993).

The government’s evidence against Cruz-Vizcarra was undeniably sufficient

to establish his guilt of the offenses to which he pleaded guilty. Before he entered

his plea, he had been informed on multiple occasions of the mandatory minimums

he faced, including by the magistrate judge at his arraignment on the indictment. 

His plea agreement, which he acknowledged and his attorney signed, advised him

-2-
that he would serve not less than ten years on Count 5, and not less than five years

on Count 6. Then, those statutory minimums appeared in writing once again in his

PSR, which did not cause him to attempt to withdraw his plea. At sentencing, his

own lawyer acknowledged in Cruz-Vizcarra’s presence the applicable statutory

minimums.

Accordingly, we reject Cruz-Vizcarra’s plea-colloquy-related issues.

Because we conclude that Cruz-Vizcarra’s plea-related issues have no merit,

we also conclude that his waiver of his right to appeal was valid. Because the rest

of his sentencing issues fall outside of his limited reservation of appellate rights,

those issues are not properly before us.

AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part.

-3-
### Tribal NSR Consultation Meeting
Tuesday April 19, 2011

U.S. EPA Region 8 Offices

- Denver, CO Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On April 19, 2011 , representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) participated in a consultati on meeting to seek input from various tribes on the rule titled:

“Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country, ” commonly known as

the “Tribal NSR Rule.” During this meeting

, various tribal members and representatives presented their concern s related to this action, including:

• The complicated process of constructing new oil and gas wells on tribal lands. They expressed that b etween the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA )

, Bureau of Land Management ( BLM )

, Bureau of Indian Affairs ( BIA ) an d other federal agencies, there are nearly 50 steps that have to be completed to obtain a permit for a new well.

Since it is much easier on non

- tribal lands, these wells are being constructed all around the reservation creating a situation where tribal mem bers are watching their neighbors prosper economically while they are unable to obtain permits.

• The need for coordination between federal agencies. The tribes feel some type of coordination needs to take place between the federal agencies to simplify the permitting process.

• EPA’s ability to implement these rules. Construction of facilities will be delayed and further economic hardship will ensure, if EPA regions do not have adequate resources to write permits when the T ribal NSR rule is implemented. Add itionally , tribes would like us to develop a mechanism that allows sources to obtain permits before the applicable dates of this rule.

• Public comment period for general permits. Tribal representatives do not u nderstand why non

- tribal members can commen t and possibly delay the permitting process for sources located on lands under control of the tribal government authority. They also asked if the public comment period for commenting on permits could be shortened from 30 days to 15 days.

In addition, tribal r epresentatives expressed their desire for additional consultation

after the rule i s signed.
ex10-34.htm


 


Exhibit 10.34













 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  









 


 


5
Samuel BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3122

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
EX PARTE Everett Emerson CORNETT, Jr.

1160106 (CR-14-1745)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
## Faulk, Scott (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: Subject: DONNA TANGONAN <donna.tangonan@mokulelehawaii.com> - - Thursday, November 21, 2013 2:26 PM EAS (OST) Kalaupapa EAS Dear Department ofTransportation (DOT) 

### - 

## '

I am writing to support Mokulele Airlines 4-year bid link to Kalaupapa to Kahului,Honolulu,Kapalua,Ho'olehua. Mokulele is one ofthe best airline that i fly inter island theywill be the best candidate as they have lowers fares experienced agents/ramper, frequent flight, multiple islands and ease ofbooking via Global Distribution system (expedia,travellocity,orbitz,priceline)lts is very importantwe have safe,stable & affordable service to Kalaupapa.I'm born and raise on the island and would love more then to see Mokulele Airlines get a chance to prove to our community that fares will be lowerfortravel for personal use doctorvisit family vacation ect...... I never seen a airline so commited to the island state wide to try to provide for evry day needs iwill bet you this will be the best service thatyou will elect forthis new 4year in to Kaluapapa. Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for4years.



### Mahafo Nui Loa, Donna Tangonan

r:::l ,,----..--------·----- 

### 0

1
Paul Wayne ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3203

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jamell M. COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-203

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 134 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.134

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
To require an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of the National 
Institutes of Health pursuant to reports and recommendations made under 
                  the National Alzheimer's Project Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Alzheimer's Accountability and 
Investment Act''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROJECT.
    Section 2 of the National Alzheimer's Project Act (42 U.S.C. 11225) 
is amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
        (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Professional Judgment Budget.--For fiscal year 2024 and each 
subsequent fiscal year, the Director of the National Institutes of 
Health shall prepare and submit, directly to the President for review 
and transmittal to Congress, after reasonable opportunity for comment, 
but without change, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and 
the Advisory Council, an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of 
the National Institutes of Health pursuant to the reports and 
recommendations made under this Act, including an estimate of the 
number and type of personnel needs for the National Institutes of 
Health.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 26, 2008



/s/ Dennis G. DracupDennis G. Dracup Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
Javier A. CARRILLO and Mayra E. Farias, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1281

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 13, 2010



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                       
|E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                           
|President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2408

_____________________________ A NTHONY D. K ELLEM , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court fo r Duval County

. Waddell Wallace , Judge

. January 30, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Lynn W. Martin of Law Office s of Lynn W. Martin , Ponte Vedra Beach
, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, Amanda D. Stokes and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Richard Earl GOODMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D15-1689

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Masakazu Kurushima,

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

(a) design such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary is, made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 30, 2007



By:

/s/ MASAKAZU KURUSHIMAMasakazu KurushimaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
J.S., the father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-2424

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018.

Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., and Roger Ally, for appellant.

Dickinson & Gibbons, P.A., and Jesse R. Butler (Sarasota); Thomasina Moore and Laura J. Lee (Sanford), for the Guardian ad Litem Program; Karla F. Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families.

Before SUAREZ, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's October 10, 2017 dependency order because the trial court's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence. *D.A. v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs.*, 84 So.3d 1136, 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ("[A] trial court's determination of dependency is a mixed question of law and fact, which will be upheld on appeal if the trial court applied the correct law and its ruling is supported by competent substantial evidence."). While it does appear that, in June 2016, the trial court transferred this case to the circuit court in Volusia County, *see* Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.205(b), the trial court docket and the court minutes reflect that the case was transferred back to the Miami-Dade County circuit court in November 2016, and that appellant waived any argument that the case was not properly retransferred to the Miami-Dade trial court when he, on several occasions, sought affirmative relief in the lower court. *D.M. v. J.D.M. ex rel. C.F.*, 814 So.2d 1112, 1115-16 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (equating a rule 8.205(b) motion to transfer a dependency case with a motion to transfer venue); *cf.**Fixel v. Clevenger*, 285 So.2d 687, 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) ("[T]he venue objection may be waived and if not timely or sufficiently asserted defendant must bear the consequences.").

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2451 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2451

To suspend temporarily the duty on footwear other than house slippers, 
                for women, valued $9.00/pair or higher.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on footwear other than house slippers, 
                for women, valued $9.00/pair or higher.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOOTWEAR OTHER THAN HOUSE SLIPPERS, FOR WOMEN, VALUED $9.00/
              PAIR OR HIGHER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Footwear other      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        than house                                                         31/2015.......
                        slippers, for
                        women, valued
                        $9.00/pair or
                        higher (provided
                        for in subheading
                        6404.19.37)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1824-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Oregon; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Oregon (FEMA-1824-DR), dated March 2, 2009, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 2, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period is now December 13, 2008, through and including December 26, 
2008.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.


Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-8372 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P