alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver) as Receiver for Bank of Wyoming, Thermopolis, Wyoming, intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Bank of Wyoming on July 10, 2009. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated at Washington, DC, on January 10, 2018.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Valerie J. Best,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-00641 Filed 1-16-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,697]


Tower Automotive Operations, USA III, LLC, Including On-Site 
Workers From Storeroom Solutions, Inc., Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Peoplelink, Traverse City, MI; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on February 9, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Tower Automotive Operations, USA III, LLC, including on-site leased 
workers from Peoplelink, Traverse City, Michigan. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on March 3, 2009 (74 FR 9278).
    At the request of the petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of automotive metal stamping and assemblies.
    New information shows that worker separations occurred involving 
employees of Storeroom Solutions, Inc. employed on-site at the Traverse 
City, Michigan location of Tower Automotive Operations USA III, LLC.
    The Storeroom Solutions, Inc. employees provided various functions 
supporting the production of automotive metal stamping and assemblies 
at the Traverse City, Michigan location and were under the control of 
Tower Automotive at that site.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include all workers of Storeroom Solutions, Inc. 
working on-site at the Traverse City, Michigan location of the subject 
firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed at Tower Automotive Operations, USA III, LLC, Traverse 
City, Michigan who were adversely affected by increased imports of 
automotive metal stampings and assemblies.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,697 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Tower Automotive Operations, USA III, LLC, 
including on-site workers from Storeroom Solutions, Inc., including 
on-site leased workers from Peoplelink, Traverse City, Michigan, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
December 15, 2007 through February 9, 2011, are eligible to apply 
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 
1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7801 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:  February 14, 2005                             /s/ Larry F Vance
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Larry F Vance
                                                     Chairman of the Board and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1363 

To eliminate the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2023 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. BARRASSO, and Mr. 

LEE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To eliminate the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repeal CFPB Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

6 The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 

7 U.S.C. 5481 et seq.) is repealed, and the provisions of law 

8 amended or repealed by that Act are restored or revived 

9 as if the Act had not been enacted. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal L 76/15 M

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 76 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4915 March 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 76

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4915 March 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 425/2006 of 14 March 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 425/2006 of 14 March 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 28 February 2006 setting up a group of high-level national regulatory experts | 3 |
| | * | Commission Decision of 8 March 2006 establishing that Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors applies to electricity generation in England, Scotland and Wales
  (notified under document number C(2006) 690)

   (1) | 6 |

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 28 February 2006 setting up a group of high-level national regulatory experts

3

*

Commission Decision of 8 March 2006 establishing that Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors applies to electricity generation in England, Scotland and Wales
  (notified under document number C(2006) 690)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2006) 690)

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Julio Antonio VASQUEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3507

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# Official Journal L 266/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 266 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4926 September 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 266

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4926 September 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Willie L. ROBEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden, CSP-LAC, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 03-55387.

D.C. No. CV-01-11091-RSWL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 29, 2004.

Decided April 7, 2004.

Elizabeth A. Newman, Federal Public Defender’S Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Willie L. Robey, Lancaster, CA, pro se.

David A. Voet, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

We affirm the district court’s denial of habeas relief because the challenged findings were not “unreasonable determination[s] of the facts in light of the evidence presented.”1 Appellant does not claim *91that the state trial judge should not have inquired about deliberations at all, so we do not consider that issue. Nor does appellant claim that the state appellate court acted contrary to or unreasonably applied any decision of the United States Supreme Court.

We do not defer to findings arrived at through factfinding procedures that are “clearly inadequate.”2 But none of the flaws in the trial court’s procedures that Robey alleges makes those procedures clearly inadequate. The state trial judge had to decide which of two jurors was telling the truth about what one of them said to the other privately in the hall before trial commenced. Asking them both, and then asking the jury foreman and another juror about'what had been said during deliberations on the same subject, was not clearly inadequate for purposes of making that determination, particularly because the judge had the benefit of his own previous colloquy with juror Marshal on the same general subject. Thus, we apply the level of deference that our case-law and the habeas statute require, and we find no “manifest error.”3

AFFIRM1ED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2).

2

. *Torres v. Prunty,*223 F.3d 1103, 1109 (9th Cir.2000).

3

. *Perez v. Marshall,*119 F.3d 1422, 1426 (9th Cir.1997).
- 2 -

Also, I am including the two flammability test video clips that I showed you a few weeks ago, accompanied by some laboratory condition information on the test conditions. This lab condition information is contained in the attached PowerPoint slides.
Please let me know if you have any more questi ons or if you require any more information.

Mark Stanga For Daikin U.S. Corporation

Enclosures (all on DVD)
Victorino GOMEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5420

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Elsy PEREZ, Appellant, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         275,193
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  392,668
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    120,688
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               823,576
<PP&E>                                         508,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                 387,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,215,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,806
<BONDS>                                        331,024
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,479,854
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,215,201
<SALES>                                      1,320,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,320,662
<CGS>                                          515,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,210,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                106,196
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            106,196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,196
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
A.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1204

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Education Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy Churchey, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, certify, in my capacity as an officer of the Trust, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








Date: April 1, 2013








/s/ Randy Churchey


Randy Churchey


Chief Executive Officer








In accordance with SEC Release No. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
f10k2011ex10iv_chinaginseng.htm


Exhibit 10.4







Labor Contract







This labor contract is based on the People’s Republic China’s labor law and labor contract law and other related laws and regulations.







Employer:  Jilin Huamei Beverage Co. Ltd







Employer’s address: 1208A Jiyu Bldg. 1420 Jie Fang  Da Road, Changchun City, Jilin, China







Legal Representative: Liu Chang Zhen







Employee: Cai Xiaohua







Gender: Male







Employee’s ID Number: 20626196505180034







Employee’s address:  2605 A No.6 Shuguangxili, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China


 


I. Contract Period & Probation Period







Both parties agree to choose (1)   for the employment terms:








	  	
1.

	
Fixed contract period: From Feb 1, 2011 to Feb 1, 2014


	 	 	 
	 	2.	No fixed contract period:  From___________________
	 	 	 
	 	3.	By Project : From _______________to completion





 


II Job Description & Job Location







CMO (Chief Marketing Officer)







III Working Hours & Time Off







Both parties agree to choose (1) for working hours


 



	  	
1.

	
Standard full time









	  	 	 




	  	
2.

	
Non Standard hours






	  	 	 




	  	
3.

	
Combined hours







 










IV Remuneration







By consensus, both parties confirm the probation wage is $1,463.70 a month, after probation is $1,463.70 a month. Payment should be in monetary form and full payment of the monthly wages shall be delivered by the the last day of the month. Employer shall not unjustifiably deduct or delay in paying the wages. The monthly wage shall not less than the minimum wage implemented by the city.







V Social Insurance and Labor benefits







In accordance with central government, state, provincial and municipal policies and regulations







VI Labor conditions and labor protection against occupational hazards







In accordance with central government, state and provincial requirements relating to the implementation of occupational safety and health







VII Termination & Renew of the Labor Contract


 




  





  











  








 


Both parties observe the central government, state and provincial regulations regarding the termination of the labor contract.  Unless the violation is expressly stipulated by state, either party in violation of the contract will be subject to the payment of appropriate compensation for breach of contract.







This contract is effective from the date signed by both parties.












Employer: Jilin Humei Beverage Co. Ltd








	
Legal Representative: Liu Chang Zhen

	
Date;  Feb 1, 2011


	  	  
	
Employee: Cai Xiaohua

	
Date: Feb 1, 2011












Governing Authority: Changchun City Employment Service (with seal)
#### Curtis J. CHRISTIANSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RANTZ, Dr.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-35914.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Curtis J. Christianson, Montana State Prison, Deer Lodge, MT, pro se.

Diana P. Leibinger-Koch, Esq., Laura L. Simonson, Department of Corrections, Helena, MT, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Curtis J. Christianson, a Montana state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s *761summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, *Frost v. Agnos,*152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

Summary judgment was proper because Christianson failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether prison officials acted with deliberate indifference in diagnosing and treating his knee condition. *See id.*at 1130. Christianson’s disagreement as to his treatment plan does not rise to the level of an Eighth Amendment violation. *See Jackson v. McIntosh,*90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th Cir.1996).

Christianson likewise failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether denial of the use of a de-rotational leg brace constituted deliberate indifference to a serious medical need because the prison officials presented uncontroverted evidence that Christianson was denied the brace based on legitimate safety concerns. *See Whitley v. Albers,*475 U.S. 312, 321-22, 106 S.Ct. 1078, 89 L.Ed.2d 251 (1986) (holding that prison officials should be accorded wide-ranging deference in the adoption and execution of policies necessary to preserve internal order and maintain institutional security).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 10.12


Exhibit 10.12