UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C.  20549





FORM
20-F





[
      ]  REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





OR


[X]  ANNUAL
      REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE   ACT OF
1934


For
      the fiscal year ended December 31,
      2009





OR


[
      ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For
      the transition period from ___________ to
  __________





OR





[
      ]  SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Date
      of event requiring this shell company report:
  ______





Commission
File Number: 000-51337





RUSH METALS
CORP.


(formerly
American Goldrush Corp.)


(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





Alberta,
Canada


(Jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)





11215 Jasper Avenue, Suite
505, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 0L5


(Address
of principal executive offices)





Securities
to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:





None





Securities
to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:





Common Stock, Fully Paid and
Non-Assessable Common Shares, Without Par Value


(Title of
Class)





Securities
for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None





Indicate
the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or
common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: The
registrant has one class of Common Stock with 42,613,920 shares outstanding as
of December 31, 2009 and June 25, 2010.  No preferred shares issued
and outstanding.





Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act   Yes [  ]  No
[X]








If this
report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes [  ] No [X]





Note –
Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from
their obligations under those Sections.


Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or





15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety
days.  Yes [X]  No [  ]





Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
[  ]  No [ X ]





Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.





Large
accelerated filer  [  ] Accelerated
filer  [  ] Non-accelerated filer [X]


Indicate
by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the
financial statements included in this filing:
 
 U.S. GAAP
[  ]                             International
Financial Reporting Standards as
issued                                                                                                    Other
[ X]
 by the International Accounting
Standards Board [  ]
 
 If
“Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check
mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to
follow.
 Item 17
[  ] Item 18 [ X ]








If this
is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell
company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)  Yes
[  ]  No [X]





Index to
Exhibits on Page ___





(APPLICABLE
ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE
YEARS)





Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all documents and reports to be
filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a
court.


Yes
[  ] No [x  ]








RUSH
METALS CORP.


(Formerly
American Goldrush Corp.)





FORM
20-F ANNUAL REPORT 2009





TABLE
OF CONTENTS








Mining
      Glossary
            iIntroduction
            iiPart
      IItem
      1.
            Identity
      of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
            1Item
      2.
            Offer
      Statistics and Expected Timetable
            1Item
      3.
            Key
      Information
            1Item
      4.
            Information
      on the Company
            12Item
      4A.
            Unresolved
      Staff Comments
            27Item
      5.
            Operating
      and Financial Review and Prospects
            27Item
      6.
            Directors,
      Senior Management and Employees
            37Item
      7.
            Major
      Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
            43Item
      8.
            Financial
      Information
            45Item
      9.
            The
      Offer and Listing
            47Item
      10.
            Additional
      Information
            48Item
      11.
            Quantitative
      and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
            52Item
      12.
            Description
      of Other Securities Other Than Equity Securities
            53Part
      IIItem
      13.
            Defaults,
      Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
            54Item
      14.
            Material
      Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of
      Proceeds
            54Item
      15.
            Controls
      and Procedures
            54Item
      16.
              A
              B
              C
              D
              E
              F
              G
            Reserved
              Audit
      Committee Financial Expert
              Code
      of Ethics
              Principle
      Accountant Fees and Services
              Exemptions
      from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
              Purchases
      of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
              Change
      n Registrants Certifying Accountant
              Corporate
      Governance
            55
              56
              56
              56
              56Part
      IIIItem
      17.
            Financial
      Statements
            57Item
      18.
            Financial
      Statements
            57Item
      19.
            Exhibits
            88Financial
      Statements
            58Signature
      Page
              
              Certifications
            89








Mining
Glossary





Au:
            Gold





Breccia:
            Rock
      composed of sharp-angled fragments embedded in a fine-grained
      matrix.





Deposit:
            A
      mineralized body which has been physically delineated by sufficient
      drilling, trenching, and/or underground work, and found to contain a
      sufficient average grade of metal or metals to warrant further exploration
      and/or development expenditures. Such a deposit does not qualify as a
      commercially mineable ore body or as containing reserves of ore, unless
      final legal, technical, and economic factors are
  resolved.





Hectare:
            A
      unit of area in the metric system equal to 100 acres, or 10,000 square
      meters, and the equivalent of 2.471 acres in British Imperial and U.S.
      Customary measure.





Mineralized
      material:
            Tonnage
      and grade estimate for non-reserve materials where sampling and geologic
      understanding is sufficient for classification as reserves, but that may
      not pass the economic test.





Ore:
            A
      natural aggregate of one or more minerals which, at a specified time and
      place, may be mined and sold at a profit or from which some part may be
      profitably separated.





Quartz:
            A
      common mineral, silicon dioxide, occurring in crystals and
      grains.





Stratigraphy:
            The
      arrangement of rock strata, especially as to geographic position and
      chronological order of sequence.





i





INTRODUCTION





We were
formed as a corporation under the federal laws of Canada pursuant to the Canada
Business Corporations Act on August 8, 2003. We are an exploration stage company
engaged principally in the acquisition, exploration, and if warranted and
feasible, development of natural resource properties in North
America.  On August 20, 2009 at an annual meeting of shareholders, a
majority of the Company’s shareholders approved a change in name of the Company
to Rush Metals Corp.





In this
Annual Report, the “Company”, “Rush Metals Corp. (formerly American Goldrush
Corp.)”, “Rush”, "we", "our", and "us", refer to Rush Metals Corp. (formerly
American Goldrush Corp.) (unless the context otherwise
requires).  Summary discussions of documents referred to in this
Annual Report may not be complete, and we refer you to the actual documents for
more complete information.  Our principal corporate offices are
located at Suite 505, 11215 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta  T5K
0L5.





BUSINESS
OF RUSH METALS CORP. (formerly American Goldrush Corp.)





Rush
Metals Corp. (formerly American Goldrush Corp.) is principally a company engaged
in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. The Company currently
has entered into one property option agreements relating to a property in
British Columbia, Canada.





FINANCIAL
AND OTHER INFORMATION





In this
Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in
Canadian Dollars (“CDN$” or “$”).  The Government of Canada permits a
floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian Dollar against the
U.S. Dollar (US$).








FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS





This
Annual Report includes forward-looking statements, principally in ITEM #4,
“Information on the Company” and ITEM #5, “Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects".  We have based these forward-looking statements largely on
our current expectations and projections about future events and financial
trends affecting our business.  These forward-looking statements are
subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions including, among other things,
the factors discussed in this Annual Report under ITEM #3, “Key Information,
Risk Factors" and factors described in documents that we may furnish from time
to time to the Securities and Exchange Commission.





The words
"believe", "may", "estimate", "continue", "anticipate", "intend", "expect", and
similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  In
light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking information, events
and circumstances discussed in this Annual Report might not
occur.  Our actual results and performance could differ substantially
from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements.  We
undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking
statements because of new information, future events or
otherwise.


ii


PART
I





ITEM
1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS


---
Not applicable ---





ITEM
2.  OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE.


---
Not applicable ---





ITEM
3.  KEY INFORMATION.





3.A Selected Financial
Data





The
selected financial data of the Company for the fiscal years ended December, 31,
2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was derived from the financial statements of
the Company that have been audited by BDO Canada LLP independent registered
public accounting firm, as indicated in their audit reports, which are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report.





The
selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and other financial information included elsewhere in the Annual
Report.





The
Company has not declared any dividends since incorporation and does not
anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future.  The present
policy of the Company is to retain all available funds for use in its operations
and the expansion of its business.





Table No.
1 is derived from the financial statements of the Company, which have been
prepared in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP). During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company extended the life
of its warrants.  Under US GAAP, such an extension resulted in a total
incremental fair value of $8,051 to be recorded as a dividend which had no
impact on the Company’s loss per share. There was no modification of warrant
terms in 2009. There are no other material numerical differences between
Canadian GAAP and US GAAP, as applicable to the Company except for the
modification of warrants in 2008 as described above.





1


Table
No. 1


Selected
Financial Data


(CDN$)








Year
            
            
            Year
            
            
            Year
            
            
            Year
            
            
            YearEnded
              12/31/09
            
            
            Ended
              12/31/08
            
            
            Ended
              12/31/07
            
            
            Ended
              12/31/06
            
            
            Ended
              12/31/05Revenue
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $NilExpenses
            
            $
            (253,756
            )
            
            $
            (54,979
            )
            
            $
            (351,943
            )
            
            $
            (1,945,540
            )
            
            $
            (101,396
            )Loss
      from operations
            
            $
            (253,756
            )
            
            $
            (54,979
            )
            
            $
            (351,943
            )
            
            $
            (1,945,540
            )
            
            $
            (101,396
            )Net
      Loss and Other Comprehensive
              Loss
      per Canadian GAAP
            
            $
            (268,316
            )
            
            $
            (23,415
            )
            
            $
            (346,255
            )
            
            $
            (1,946,089
            )
            
            $
            (102,926
            )Basic
      and diluted (Loss) Per Share
            
            $
            (0.01
            )
            
            $
            (0.00
            )
            
            $
            (0.01
            )
            
            $
            (0.05
            )
            
            $
            (0.00
            )Dividends
      Per Share
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $NilWeighted
      Avg. Shares
            
            
            41,823,509
            
            
            
            41,613,920
            
            
            
            41,613,920
            
            
            
            40,997,133
            
            
            
            39,557,350Period-end
      Shares
            
            
            42,613,920
            
            
            
            41,613,920
            
            
            
            41,613,920
            
            
            
            41,613,920
            
            
            
            39,557,350Working
      Capital (deficiency)
            
            $
            26,021
            
            
            $
            152,170
            
            
            $
            32,679
            
            
            $
            355,721
            
            
            $
            (69,918
            )Long-Term
      Debt
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $NilShare
      Capital
            
            $
            784,442
            
            
            $
            684,442
            
            
            $
            684,442
            
            
            $
            684,442
            
            
            $
            100,735Shareholders’
      Equity (Capital Deficit)
            
            $
            29,388
            
            
            $
            155,537
            
            
            $
            53,940
            
            
            $
            359,088
            
            
            $
            (69,918
            )Total
      Assets
            
            $
            53,024
            
            
            $
            177,823
            
            
            $
            84,334
            
            
            $
            418,249
            
            
            $
            23,748








3.A.3.  Exchange
Rates





In this
Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in
Canadian Dollars (CDN$).  The Government of Canada permits a floating
exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian Dollar against the U.S.
Dollar (US$).





Table No.
2 sets forth the exchange rates for the Canadian Dollar at the end of each of
the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, and the average
rates for the period and the range of high and low rates for the
period.  The data for May 2010 and for each month during the most
recent six months is also provided.





For
purposes of this table, the rate of exchange means the noon buying rate in New
York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs
purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.  The table sets
forth the number of Canadian Dollars required under that formula to buy one U.S.
Dollar.  The average rate means the average of the exchange rates on
the last day of each month during the period.





2


Table
No. 2


U.S.
Dollar/Canadian Dollar








Period
            Average
            High
            Low
            CloseMay
      2010
            1.04
            1.01
            1.08
            1.05April
      2010
            1.01
            1.00
            1.02
            1.01March
      2010
            1.02
            1.01
            1.04
            1.02February
      2010
            1.06
            1.04
            1.08
            1.04January
      2010
            1.04
            1.02
            1.07
            1.07December
      2009
            1.05
            1.04
            1.07
            1.05Fiscal
      Year Ended December 31, 2009
            1.14
            1.03
            1.30
            1.05Fiscal
      Year Ended December 31, 2008
            1.07
            0.97
            1.30
            1.22Fiscal
      Year Ended December 31, 2007
            1.07
            0.91
            1.19
            0.98








3.B.  Capitalization
and Indebtedness





--- Not
applicable ---





3.C.  Reasons for
the Offer and Use of Proceeds





--- Not
applicable ---





3.D.  Risk
Factors





This
investment has a high degree of risk.  Before you invest you should
carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other
information in this prospectus.  If any of the following risks
actually occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be
harmed and the value of our stock could go down.  This means you could
lose all or a part of your investment.








RISKS
RELATING TO OUR COMPANY





1.
            Our
      auditors’ opinion on our December 31, 2009 financial statements includes
      an explanatory paragraph in respect of there being substantial doubt about
      our ability to continue as a going
concern.





We have
incurred an accumulated net loss of $2,789,803 for the periods ending December
31, 2009, since inception.  We anticipate generating losses for at
least the next 12 months.  Therefore, there is substantial doubt about
our ability to continue operations in the future as a going concern as described
in the Comments for US Readers on Canada – US Reporting Differences by our
auditors with respect to the financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2009.  Our financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the
amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the
event the Company cannot continue in existence.





Our plans
to deal with this uncertainty include raising additional capital or entering
into a strategic arrangement with a third party. If we cannot continue as a
viable entity, our shareholders may lose some or all of their investment in our
company.





3


2.
            As
      only our directors, Messrs. Noland, Coale, and Diakiw have technical
      training or experience in exploring for, starting, and operating a mine,
      we will have to hire qualified consultants. If we cannot locate qualified
      consultants, we may have to suspend or cease operations which will result
      in the loss of your investment.





Only our
directors, Messrs. Noland, Coale and Diakiw, have experience with exploring for,
starting, and operating a mine. Except for these three individuals, none of our
executive officers have any technical training or experience in exploring for,
starting, and operating a mine. As such, we will have to hire qualified
consultants to perform surveying and exploration of our properties. The other
executive officers and director have no direct training or experience in these
areas and as a result may not be fully aware of many of the specific
requirements related to working within the industry. Their decisions and choices
may not take into account standard engineering or managerial approaches, mineral
exploration companies commonly use. Consequently our operations, earnings and
ultimate financial success could suffer irreparable harm due to management's
lack of experience in this industry. As a result we may have to suspend or cease
operations which will result in the loss of your investment.





3.
            Not
      all of our properties have been examined by a professional geologist or
      mining engineer and we have no known mineral reserves on any of our
      properties. Without mineral reserves we cannot generate income, and if we
      cannot generate income we will have to cease
  operations.





The
Mammoth property has not been examined by a professional geologist or mining
engineer.  As such, we have no known mineral reserves on our property.
Without mineral reserves, we have nothing to economically remove. If we have
nothing to economically remove from our property, we cannot generate income and
in such a situation, we will have to cease operations which will result in the
loss of your investment.





4.
            Weather
      interruptions in the Province of British Columbia may delay our proposed
      exploration operations. Such delay will extend the time when we may be
      able to generate revenues.





Our
proposed exploration work on the Mammoth Property can only be performed
approximately five to six months out of the year. This is because rain and snow
cause travel to our claims to be difficult during six to seven months of the
year. During the winter, we are unable to conduct exploration operations on the
Mammoth Property. This could delay exploration and subsequent removal of any
mineralized material, should any be discovered. As a result of the delay in
removing mineralized material, no revenue will be generated by us, which will
result in the loss of your investment.





5.
            Since
      Messrs. Noland, Coale, Diakiw, Brisset and Uppal, directors of the
      Company, have other outside business activities and will only be devoting
      20% of their time to our operations, our operations may be sporadic. This
      may result in periodic interruptions or suspensions of exploration which
      may result in the loss of your
investment.





Since our
directors and executive officers have other outside business activities and will
only be devoting 20% of their time to our operations, our operations may be
sporadic and only occur at times which are convenient to Messrs. Noland, Coale,
Diakiw, Brisset and Uppal. As a result, exploration of our properties may be
periodically interrupted or suspended.





4


6.
            If
      we are unable to obtain additional funding, our business operations will
      be harmed.  Even if we do obtain additional financing our then
      existing shareholders may suffer substantial
  dilution.





We will
require additional funds to meet our obligations under our existing property
option agreements and to acquire and development interests in new properties
that we want to explore for natural mineral resources in the future. We
anticipate that we will require up to approximately CDN $179,600 to fund our
continued operations for the next twelve months. Even with the proceeds of
$100,000 received in October 2009 from the exercise of warrants, we do not have
sufficient cash to meet our minimum obligations for the next twelve
months.  Additional capital will be required to effectively support
the operations and to otherwise implement our overall business strategy. The
inability to obtain additional capital will restrict our ability to grow and may
reduce our ability to continue to conduct business operations.  If we
are unable to obtain additional financing, we will likely be required to curtail
our development plans which could cause the company to become dormant. Any
additional equity financing may involve substantial dilution to our then
existing shareholders.





7.
            If
      we do not continue to make payments under our Property Option Agreement
      for our property, we will lose our interest in the properties as well as
      losing all monies incurred in connection with the
    properties.





We have currently secured, under our
Property Option Agreement, the right to acquire a 100% interest in the Mammoth
property.  Pursuant to the Option Agreement, we may continue to
exercise the option only by making a series of annual cash payments and
incurring net expenditures on the property.  See the Property option
agreement description located in the section entitled “Section 4.D - Property
Plant, and Equipment” of this 20-F for a more detailed description of the Option
Agreement.





If we do
not make the required payments or incur the required expenditures in accordance
with the Option Agreement we will lose our option to purchase the respective
property and may not be able to continue to execute our business objectives if
we are unable to find an alternate exploration interest. As of June 25, 2010, we
are in default of our property option agreement; however, the optionor of the
property option agreement has agreed to not revoke our option at this time. This
may change if we continue to be in default. Our property option agreement is
separate from any other and one agreement will not impact our rights under any
of the other agreements.





8.
            Because
      our business involves numerous operating hazards, we may be subject to
      claims of a significant size which would cost a significant amount of
      funds and resources to rectify. This could force us to cease our
      operations, which will cause you a loss of your
  investment.





Our
operations are subject to the usual hazards inherent in exploring for minerals,
such as general accidents, explosions, chemical exposure, and
craterings.  The occurrence of these or similar events could result in
the suspension of operations, damage to or destruction of the equipment involved
and injury or death to personnel. Operations also may be suspended because of
machinery breakdowns, abnormal climatic conditions, failure of subcontractors to
perform or supply goods or services or personnel shortages. The occurrence of
any such contingency would require us to incur additional costs and force us to
cease our operations, which will cause you a loss of your
investment.





5


9.
            Damage
      to the environment could also result from our operations.  If
      our business is involved in one or more of these hazards, we may be
      subject to claims of a significant size which could force us to cease our
      operations.





Mineral
resource exploration, production and related operations are subject to extensive
rules and regulations of federal, provincial, state and local
agencies.  Failure to comply with these rules and regulations can
result in substantial penalties.  Our cost of doing business may be
affected by the regulatory burden on the mineral industry since the rules and
regulations frequently are amended or interpreted.  We cannot predict
the future cost or impact of complying with these laws.





Environmental
enforcement efforts with respect to mineral operations have increased over the
years, and it is possible that regulation could expand and have a greater impact
on future mineral exploration operations.  Although our management
intends to comply with all legislation and/or actions of local, provincial,
state and federal governments, non-compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements could subject us to penalties, fines and regulatory actions, the
cost of which could harm our results of operations.  We cannot be sure
that our proposed business operations will not violate environmental laws in the
future.





Our
operations and properties are subject to extensive federal, state, provincial
and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including
the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of
materials into the environment, and relating to safety and health. These laws
and regulations may do any of the following: (i) require the acquisition of a
permit or other authorization before exploration commences, (ii) restrict the
types, quantities and concentration of various substances that can be released
into the environment in connection with exploration activities, (iii) limit or
prohibit mineral exploration on certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands
and other protected areas, (iv) require remedial measures to mitigate pollution
from former operations and  (v)  impose
substantial  liabilities  for  pollution  resulting  from  our  proposed
operations.





The
exploration of mineral reserves are subject to all of the usual hazards and
risks associated with mineral exploration, which could result in damage to life
or property, environmental damage, and possible legal liability for any or all
damages. The exploration activities may be subject to prolonged disruptions due
to the weather conditions surrounding the location of the Mammoth
Property.  Difficulties, such as unusual or unexpected rock formations
encountered by workers but not indicated on a map, or other conditions may be
encountered in the gathering of samples and information, and could delay our
exploration program.  Even though we are at liberty to obtain
insurance against certain risks in such amounts we deem adequate, the nature of
those risks is such that liabilities could over exceed policy limits or be
excluded from coverage.  We do not currently carry insurance to
protect against these risks and we may not obtain such insurance in the
future.  There are also risks against which we cannot, or may not
elect to insure.  The costs, which could be associated with any
liabilities, not covered by insurance or in excess of insurance coverage or
compliance with applicable laws and regulations may cause substantial delays and
require significant capital outlays, thereby hurting our financial position,
future earnings, and/or competitive positions.  We may not have enough
capital to continue operations and you will lose your investment.





6


10.
            Because
      of the speculative nature of exploration and development, there is a
      substantial risk that our business will
fail.





The
search for valuable natural resources on our properties is extremely risky as
the exploration for natural resources is a speculative venture involving
substantial risk. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into
producing mines. Problems such as unusual or unexpected formations and other
conditions are involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful
exploration efforts.  Because the probability of an individual
prospect ever having reserves is extremely remote, in all probability our
properties do not contain any reserves, and any funds we spent on exploration
will probably be lost. In such a case, we would be unable to complete our
business plan.





Mineral
exploration involves a high degree of risk and exploration projects are
frequently unsuccessful.  To the extent that we continue to be
involved in mineral exploration, the long-term success of our operations will be
related to the cost and success of our exploration programs. The risks
associated with mineral exploration include:





·
            the
      identification of potential mineralization  based on superficial
      analysis;





·
            the
      quality of our management and our geological and technical expertise;
      and





·
            the
      capital available for exploration and
  development.





Substantial
expenditures are required to determine if a project has economically mineable
mineralization.  It may take several years to establish proven and
probable reserves and to develop and construct mining and processing facilities.
Problems such as unusual or unexpected formations and other conditions are
involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration
efforts.  In such a case, we would be unable to develop our
business.





11.
            We
      may not be able to compete with current and potential exploration
      companies, some of whom have greater resources and experience than we do
      in developing mineral reserves.





The
natural resource market is intensely competitive, highly fragmented and subject
to rapid change.  We may be unable to compete successfully with our
existing competitors or with any new competitors.  We compete with
many exploration companies which have significantly greater personnel,
financial, managerial, and technical resources than we do. This competition from
other companies with greater resources and reputations may result in our failure
to maintain or expand our business.





12.
            If
      we lose the services of any of our management team we may not be able to
      continue to operate our business and may be required to cease
      operations.





We are
presently dependent to a great extent upon the experience, abilities and
continued services of Paul Noland, our Director, Chairman, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Operating Officer. Mr. Noland, who currently spends
approximately 1 day per week working on the Company’s business, has an extensive
background in the natural resource exploration industry and the loss of his
services would negatively impact our operations. If we lost the services of this
individual we would be forced to find other qualified management to assist us in
location and exploration of a property. This would be costly to us in terms of
both time and expenses.  We do not maintain an employment agreement
with Mr. Noland nor do we have key-man life insurance on him. Therefore, if we
were unable to replace the services and experience of Mr. Noland, we may be
forced to discontinue our operations.





7


13.
            The
      prices of metals are highly volatile and a decrease in metals prices could
      result in us incurring losses.





The
profitability of natural resource operations are directly related to the market
prices of the underlying commodities.  The market prices of metals
fluctuate significantly and are affected by a number of factors beyond our
control, including, but not limited to, the rate of inflation, the exchange rate
of the dollar to other currencies, interest rates, and global economic and
political conditions.  Price fluctuations in the metals markets from
the time development of a mine is undertaken and the time production can
commence can significantly affect the profitability of a
mine.  Accordingly, we may begin to develop a mineral property at a
time when the price of the underlying metals make such exploration economically
feasible and, subsequently, incur losses because metals prices have
decreased.  Adverse fluctuations of metals market price may force us
to curtail or cease our business operations.





14.
            Our
      principal stockholders, officers and directors own a controlling interest
      in our voting stock and investors will not have any voice in our
      management, which could result in decisions adverse to our general
      shareholders.





Our
officers and directors, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately or have
the right to vote 70.4% of our outstanding common stock.  As a result,
these stockholders, acting together, will have the ability to control
substantially all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval
including:





·
            election  of  our  board  of  directors;


·
            removal  of  any  of  our  directors;


·
            amendment  of  our  Articles
      of
      Incorporation  or  bylaws;  and


·
            adoption
      of measures that could delay or prevent a change in control or impede a
      merger, takeover or other business combination involving
    us.





As a
result of their ownership and positions, our directors and executive officers
collectively are able to influence all matters requiring shareholder approval,
including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate
transactions. In addition, sales of significant amounts of shares held by our
directors and executive officers, or the prospect of these sales, could affect
the market price of our common stock if the marketplace does not orderly adjust
to the increase in shares in the market and the value of your investment in the
Company may decrease.  Management's stock ownership may discourage a
potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain
control of us, which in turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our
stockholders from realizing a premium over our stock price.





15.
            We
      are an exploration stage company and the probability that commercially
      viable deposits or "reserves" exists in the property is extremely
      remote.





We are an
exploration stage company with no known commercially viable deposits, or
"reserves" on our properties. Therefore, determination of the
existence  of  a  reserve  will  depend  on
appropriate  and  sufficient  exploration  work  and
the  evaluation  of  legal, economic, and
environmental  factors. If we fail to find a commercially viable
deposit on any of our properties our financial condition and results of
operations will suffer.  If we cannot generate income from the
properties we will have to cease operation which will result in the loss of your
investment.





8


16.
            We
      may not have the funds to purchase all of the supplies, manpower and
      materials we need to begin exploration which could cause us to delay or
      suspend operations.





Competition
and unforeseen limited sources of supplies in the industry could result in
occasional spot shortages of supplies, manpower and certain equipment such as
bulldozers and excavators that we might need to conduct exploration. If there is
a shortage or scarcity, we cannot compete with larger companies in the
exploration industry for supplies, manpower and equipment.  In the
event that the prices for such resources rise above our affordability levels, we
may have to delay or suspend operations.  In the event we are forced
to limit our exploration activities, we may not find any minerals, even though
our properties may contain mineralized material. Without any minerals we cannot
generate revenues and you may lose your investment.





17.
            Because
      of the early stage of development and the nature of our business, our
      securities are considered highly
speculative.





Our
securities must be considered highly speculative, generally because of the
nature of our business and the early stage of its development. We are engaged in
the business of exploring and, if warranted and feasible, developing natural
resource properties.  Our current properties are in the exploration
stage only and are without known reserves of natural
resources.  Accordingly, we have not generated any revenues nor have
we realized a profit from our operations to date and there is little likelihood
that we will generate any revenues or realize any profits in the short
term.  Any profitability in the future from our business will be
dependent upon locating and developing economic reserves of natural resources,
which itself is subject to numerous risk factors as set forth herein. Since we
have not generated any revenues, we will have to raise additional monies through
the sale of our equity securities or debt in order to continue our business
operations.





18.
            It
      is possible that there may be native or aboriginal claims to our property,
      which could result in us incurring additional expenses to explore our
      properties.





Although we believe that we have the
right to explore our properties, we cannot substantiate that there are no native
or aboriginal claims to the properties. Native groups have made extensive land
claims to large areas of land within British Columbia and various parts of the
United States.  The status of such claims is uncertain, and has not
been resolved despite lengthy and expensive court proceedings.  If a
native or aboriginal claim is made to any of our properties, it would negatively
affect our ability to explore this property as we would have to incur
significant legal fees protecting our right to explore the property. We may also
have to pay third parties to settle such claims.  If it is determined
that there is a legitimate claim to any of our properties then we may be forced
to return this property without adequate consideration.  Even if there
is no legal basis for such claim, the costs involved in resolving such matter
may force us to delay or curtail our exploration completely.  When we
make the application to commence our exploration activities, representatives of
Native groups will have the right to participate in, or may be consulted in,
review by regulatory authorities of our proposed mining
operations.  If this occurs, we may have to incur additional resources
and it may take longer to obtain the required permits.





RISKS
RELATING TO OUR COMMON SHARES





19.
            We
      may, in the future, issue additional common shares, which would reduce
      investors’ percent of ownership and may dilute our share
      value.





Our
Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of an unlimited number of
common shares without par value and an unlimited number of preferred shares
without par value.  The future issuance of our unlimited authorized
common shares may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common
shares held by our then existing shareholders. We may value any common shares
issued in the future on an arbitrary basis.  The issuance of common
shares for future services or acquisitions or other corporate actions may have
the effect of diluting the value of the shares held by our investors, and might
have an adverse effect on any trading market for our common shares.





9


20.
            Our
      common shares are subject to the "Penny Stock" Rules of the SEC and the
      trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in
      our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our
      stock.





The
Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the
definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity
security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an
exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions.  For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless
exempt, the rules require:





·
            that
      a broker or dealer approve a person's  account for transactions
      in  penny  stocks;  and


·
            the
      broker or dealer  receive from the investor a
      written  agreement to
      the  transaction,  setting forth the identity and
      quantity of the
      penny  stock  to  be  purchased.





In order
to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or
dealer must:





·
            obtain
      financial information and investment experience objectives of
      the  person;  and


·
            make
      a  reasonable  determination  that  the  transactions  in
      penny stocks are  suitable  for that person and the
      person has  sufficient
      knowledge  and  experience  in  financial  matters  to
      be capable of
      evaluating  the  risks  of  transactions  in  penny  stocks.





The
broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a
disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock
market, which, in highlight form:





·
            sets  forth  the  basis
      on  which  the  broker  or  dealer  made
      the
  suitability  determination;  and


·
            that
      the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the
      investor prior to the transaction.





Generally,
brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the
"penny stock" rules.  This may make it more difficult for investors to
dispose of our Common shares and cause a decline in the market value of our
stock.





Disclosure
also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public
offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the
broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the
securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of
fraud in penny stock transactions.  Finally, monthly statements have
to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the
account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.





21.
            We
      have registered a significant number of common shares underlying our
      warrants and stock options that may be available for future
      sale.  The sale of these shares may depress the market price of
      our Common shares and shareholders could suffer a loss on their
      investment.





As of
June 25, 2010, we had 42,613,920 common shares issued and warrants outstanding
to purchase an aggregate of 31,163,140 common shares and stock options
outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 75,000 common shares.  All of
these shares and those shares underlying the warrants have been registered and
may be sold without restriction.  If such warrants are exercised in
full and converted to common shares, our shareholders may experience a decline
in the price of our common shares as such common shares are sold into the open
market.  If such decline in the price of our common shares were to
materialize, shareholders could suffer a loss on their investment.





On June
24, 2005, we registered our 2005 Stock Option plan pursuant to which stock
options were granted in 2005 of which 150,000 were canceled in 2008 and 425,000
were canceled in 2009.  No stock options were granted in 2009, 2008,
2007 or 2006.  Such common shares underlying stock options are freely
tradable upon exercise of such options.





10


22.
            There
      is no current trading market for our securities and if a trading market
      does not develop, purchasers of our securities may have difficulty selling
      their shares.





We have
applied for admission for quotation of our securities on the OTC Bulletin Board,
and as of October 2008 have received approval to trade under the symbol
AGRUF.   In October 2009 the symbol was changed to RSMTF to
reflect the name change from American Goldrush Corp. to Rush Metals
Corp.  There is currently no established public trading market for our
securities and an active trading market in our securities may not develop or, if
developed, may not be sustained.    If for any reason a
public trading market does not otherwise develop, purchasers of the shares may
have difficulty selling their common shares should they desire to do
so.





23.
            State
      securities laws may limit secondary trading, which may restrict the states
      in which and conditions under which you can sell the Company’s common
      shares.





Secondary trading in the Company’s
common stock will not be possible in any state until the common shares are
qualified for sale under the applicable securities laws of the state or there is
confirmation that an exemption, such as listing in certain recognized securities
manuals, is available for secondary trading in the state. If we fail to register
or qualify, or to obtain or verify an exemption for the secondary trading of,
the common shares in any particular state, the common shares could not be
offered or sold to, or purchased by, a resident of that state. In the event that
a significant number of states refuse to permit secondary trading in our common
shares, the liquidity for the common shares could be significantly impacted thus
causing you to realize a loss on your investment.





24.
            We
      are a “foreign private issuer”, and you may not have access to the
      information you could obtain about us if we were not a “foreign private
      issuer”.





We are
considered a "foreign private issuer" under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. As an issuer incorporated in Canada, we will be required to prepare our
annual and interim financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles. For purpose of our annual disclosure obligations
in the United States, we will annually file in the United States financial
statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP together with a
reconciliation to US GAAP.  In addition, as a foreign private issuer
we will not have to file quarterly reports with the SEC nor will our directors,
officers and 10% stockholders be subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
As a foreign private issuer we will not be subject to the proxy rules of Section
14 of the Exchange Act. Furthermore, Regulation FD does not apply to non-U.S.
companies and will not apply to us. Accordingly, you may not be able to obtain
information about us as you could obtain if we were not a “foreign private
issuer”.





25.
            Because
      we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common shares, our
      stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless
      they sell them.





We intend
to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our
business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common shares in
the foreseeable future.  Unless we pay dividends, our stockholders
will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell
them.





11


26.
            We
      may become a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, which could
      result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to U.S.
  investors.





If we are
a “passive foreign investment company” or “PFIC” as defined in Section 1297 of
the Code, U.S. Holders will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation under one
of two alternative tax regimes at the election of each such U.S. Holder. Section
1297 of the Code defines a PFIC as a corporation that is not formed in the
United States and either (i) 75% or more of its gross income for the taxable
year is “passive income”, which generally includes interest, dividends and
certain rents and royalties or (ii) the average percentage, by fair market value
(or, if we elect, adjusted tax basis), of its assets that produce or are held
for the production of “passive income” is 50% or more. Whether we are a PFIC in
any year and the tax consequences relating to PFIC status will depend on the
composition of our income and assets, including cash. U.S. Holders should be
aware, however, that if we become a PFIC, it may not be able or willing to
satisfy record-keeping requirements that would enable U.S. Holders to make an
election to treat us as a “qualified electing fund” for purposes of one of the
two alternative tax regimes applicable to a PFIC. We strongly urge U.S. holders
or potential shareholders to consult their own tax advisor concerning the impact
of these rules on their investment in us.





27.
            Because
      our Company and three of our directors are located outside the United
      States, it may be difficult for an investor to enforce within the United
      States any judgments obtained against us or any of our officers and
      directors.








Our
Company and three of our directors are located outside of the United States and
we do not maintain a permanent place of business within the United
States.  In addition, three of our directors and officers are
nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or
a substantial portion of such persons' assets are located outside the United
States.  As a result, it may be difficult for an investor to effect
service of process or enforce within the United States any judgments obtained
against us or our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the
civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any
state thereof. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of
Canada would recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained
against us or our directors and officers predicated upon the civil liability
provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.
There is even uncertainty as to whether the Canadian courts would have
jurisdiction to hear original actions brought in Canada against us or our
directors and officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States
or any state thereof.





ITEM
4.  INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY





4.A. HISTORY AND CORPORATE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY





We were
formed as a corporation under the Federal laws of Canada pursuant to the Canada
Business Corporations Act on August 8, 2003. We are a natural resource
exploration stage company and anticipate acquiring, exploring, and if warranted
and feasible, developing natural resource properties.





We are a
mineral exploration company in the exploration stage, and cannot give assurance
that commercially viable minerals exist on the property.  Extensive
geological analysis of our properties will be required before we can make an
evaluation as to the economic feasibility of developing or finding valuable
resources on these grounds. We have not, as yet, identified any mineral
resources on our properties.








12


Taylor
Claims





On
February 18, 2004, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement giving
the Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a 100% interest in the
Taylor Claims located in the Lillooet Mining Division in the Province of British
Columbia. The Property Option Agreement was amended on November 29,
2004.  The Company may have exercised the option by making cash
payments totalling $70,000 and incurring net expenditures on the property of at
least $525,000.  The Company paid the initial $5,000 deposit as
required under the initial Property Option Agreement.  The Company
also paid an additional $5,000 upon the signing of the amendment.  On
November 23, 2005, the Company terminated the Property Option
Agreement.





South Vulture
Property





On March
24, 2006, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement giving the
Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a 100% interest in a mineral
exploration permit covering the South Vulture property located in Maricopa
County, Arizona.  The Company may exercise the option by making cash
payments totalling CDN $27,294 (USD $25,000) and incurring net expenditures on
the property of at least CDN $119,793 (USD $120,000) by March 24,
2010.  The Company paid the initial CDN $5,850 (USD $5,000) deposit as
required under the Property Option Agreement and made the annual payments of CDN
$5,660 (USD $5,000) and CDN $5,870 (USD $5,000) due March 24, 2008 and 2007
respectively.  On February 24, 2009, the Company terminated the
Property Option Agreement.





GQ
Property





On June
1, 2006 we entered into a property option agreement with Warner Gruenwald to
acquire a 100% interest in a property in the Province of British Columbia known
as the GQ Property.  We may exercise our option by making cash
payments totalling CDN $100,000 and incurring net expenditures of CDN $110,000
by June 1, 2010.  The Company made the $10,000 and $20,000 payment on
June 1, 2007 and 2008 respectively and also met its obligations with respect to
the minimum exploration expenditures for 2007 and 2008.  In 2009 the
Company incurred $45,877 in exploration expenditures; however, was in default of
the $30,000 cash payment due June 1, 2009.  On April 23, 2010, the
Company terminated the Property Option Agreement.





Margarita
Property





On July
14, 2006 we entered into a property option agreement with James Sorrell to
acquire a 100% interest in a property in Santa Cruz County, Arizona known as the
Margarita Property.  We made an initial payment of CDN $39,300 (USD
$35,000) upon signing the agreement and we may exercise our option by making
further cash payments totalling CDN $822,908 (USD $825,000) by May 31, 2012 and
incurring net expenditures of CDN $675,405 (USD $675,000) by May 31,
2009.  Also on July 14, 2006 in relation to the Company entering into
the Margarita Property Option Agreement, the Company entered into a Finder’s Fee
Agreement with Fred Brost under which it is estimated that if the Company makes
all of the scheduled property option payments to Mr. Sorrell, the amount paid
under the Finder’s Fee Agreement to Mr. Brost will be CDN $30,730 (USD
$31,000).





The
Company paid the initial payment of CDN $39,300 (USD $35,000) upon signing the
Margarita Property Option Agreement and paid CDN $3,930 (USD $3,500) under the
Finder’s Fee Agreement.  In addition, On May 31, 2007 the Company made
the property option payment of CDN $54,650 (USD $50,000) and the related
finders’ fee payment of CDN $5,465 (USD $5,000) and also met its obligations
with respect to the minimum exploration expenditures for 2007.





13


On
January 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Assignment and Assumption
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Patriot Gold Corp. (“Patriot”) to assign the
Company’s rights and obligations under the Margarita Property Option Agreement
to Patriot.  Pursuant to the Agreement, Patriot assumed the rights,
and agreed to perform all of the duties and obligations, of the Company arising
under the Margarita Property Option Agreement. Simultaneous with the execution
and delivery of the Agreement, Patriot paid the Company CDN $201,600 (USD
$200,000) which amount represents the full payment and satisfaction for the
assignment to Patriot by the Company.  Included in the assignment to
Patriot were, without limitation, all sums incurred by the Company in connection
with its exploration of the Margarita Property which includes the refunding of
the reclamation bond previously paid by the Company to the Forest Service in
Arizona, all expenditure credits incurred by the Company prior to the execution
of the Agreement and all property option payments made to the Margarita
Property. In addition, as the Company also assigned all of its rights and
obligations under the Finders’ Fee Agreement to Patriot, it is no longer
required to make further payments.  Subsequent to the execution of the
Agreement, the Company did not retain any interest in the Margarita
Property.





Mammoth
Property





On July
15, 2009, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement with Peak
Geological Inc, giving the Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a
100% interest in a mineral exploration permit covering the Mammoth property
located in Prince George, BC.  The property, known as the Mammoth
Property, consists of 102 mineral tenure claims and covers approximately 47,000
hectares.  In addition, the Company is subject to a 2% net smelter
return royalty to the optioner upon production.





The
Company may exercise the option by making a cash payment of $60,000 upon signing
the Agreement, plus additional cash payments of $40,000, and incurring net
expenditures on the property of at least CDN$ 1,000,000 by April 1,
2013.  Minimum payments due under the Property Option Agreement are
summarized as follows:





Date
            Cash
      Payments
            ExpendituresCDN
            CDNJuly
      15, 2009
            $60,000On
      or before April 01, 2010
            $10,000
            $200,000On
      or before April 01, 2011
            $10,000
            $200,000On
      or before April 01, 2012
            $10,000
            $200,000On
      or before April 01, 2013
            $10,000
            $400,000





The
Company paid the initial CDN $60,000 upon signing the agreement and has incurred
$70,000 in exploration expenses by December 31, 2009.  At June 25,
2010 the Company had a shortfall in property expenditures of $130,000 and cash
expenditures of $10,000 and is currently in default.  The Company is
at risk of losing its interest in the property by not making the indicated
option payments and incurring the exploration expenditures, when demanded.
Subsequent to year end, the Company did not fulfill its commitments under the
option agreement. However, the optioner agreed not to revoke the option
agreement at this time.








No
commercially viable mineral deposit may exist on our mineral
claims.  Our plan of operations is to carry out geological analysis of
these claims in order to ascertain whether they possess deposits of gold or
silver.  We can provide no assurance to investors that our mineral
claims contain a commercially viable mineral deposit until appropriate
exploratory work is done and an evaluation based on that work concludes further
work programs are justified.  At this time, we definitely have no
known reserves on our mineral claims.





For the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we did not generate
any revenue.





14


Our
principal offices are located at 11215 Jasper Avenue, Suite 505, Edmonton,
Alberta T5K 0L5; our telephone number is (780) 498-2907. We do not yet maintain
an Internet address.





4.B. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW





We are an
exploration stage company incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations
Act in British Columbia, Canada on August 8, 2003 under the name “American
Goldrush Corporation”.  On August 20, 2009 at an Annual General
Meeting of the Shareholders of the Corporation, a majority of the Company’s
shareholders granted the Board of Directors the authority to amend the Company’s
Articles of Incorporation in connection with a name change of the Company to one
of the following: Goldrush Metals Corp., Rush Exploration Corp., Rush Metals
Corp., or such other name as may be approved by the Board of Directors and
Corporations Canada.  On August 31, 2009 the Board of Directors
approved a name change of the Company to Rush Metals Corp.  Our
registered office, head office and principal place of business located at 11215
Jasper Avenue, Suite 505, Edmonton, Alberta T5K 0L5.  Our telephone
number is (780) 498-2907.





We are a
natural resource exploration stage company and anticipate acquiring, exploring,
and if warranted and feasible, developing natural resource properties. We may
seek relationships with other mineral exploration and development companies that
will allow us to exploit idle and/or undeveloped resources.





MATERIAL EFFECTS OF
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS





Mineral
resource exploration, production and related operations are subject to extensive
rules and regulations of federal, state and local agencies.  We may be
required to obtain work permits, post bonds and perform remediation work for any
physical disturbance to the land in order to comply with these
laws.  While our planned exploration program budgets for regulatory
compliance, there is a risk that new regulations could increase our costs of
doing business and prevent us from carrying out exploration
program.





Failure
to comply with these rules and regulations can result in substantial
penalties.  Our cost of doing business may be affected by the
regulatory burden on the mineral industry. We believe that compliance with the
laws will not adversely affect our business operations.





Environmental
enforcement efforts with respect to mineral operations have increased over the
years, and it is possible that regulation could expand and have a greater impact
on future mineral exploration operations.  Although our management
intends to comply with all legislation and/or actions of local, provincial,
state and federal governments, non-compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements could subject us to penalties, fines and regulatory actions, the
cost of which could harm our results of operations.  We cannot be sure
that our proposed business operations will not violate environmental laws in the
future.





ANTICIPATED CHANGES TO
FACILITIES AND EMPLOYEES





Management
of the Company anticipates no changes to either facilities or employees in the
near future.





SEASONALITY, DEPENDENCY UPON
PATENTS, LICENSES, CONTRACTS, PROCESSES, SOURCES AND AVAILIBILTY OF RAW
MATERIALS





Certain
of the Company’s properties are in remote locations and subject to significant
temperature variations and changes in working conditions.  It is not
possible to actively explore the Company’s property in British Columbia
throughout the year because seasonal changes in the weather.  If
exploration is pursued at the wrong time of year, the Company may incur
additional costs to address issues relating to the weather.





15


If we
commence drilling, shortages or an increase in cost of drilling rigs, equipment,
supplies or personnel could delay or interrupt our operations, which could
impact our financial condition and results of operations.  Drilling
activity in the geographic areas in which we conduct drilling activities may
increase, which would lead to increases in associated costs, including those
related to drilling rigs, equipment, supplies and personnel and the services and
products of other vendors to the industry. Increased drilling activity in these
areas may also decrease the availability of rigs.  We do not have any
contracts with providers of drilling rigs and, consequently we may not be able
to obtain drilling rigs when we need them.  Therefore, our drilling
and other costs may increase further and necessary equipment and services may
not be available to us at economical prices.





COMPETITION





The
mineral exploration industry is intensely competitive, highly fragmented and
subject to rapid change.  We may be unable to compete successfully
with our existing competitors or with any new competitors.  We compete
with many exploration companies which have significantly greater personnel,
financial, managerial, and technical resources than we do.  This
competition from other companies with greater resources and reputations may
result in our failure to maintain or expand our business.





4.C. ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE





The
Company is not part of a group and has no subsidiaries.





4.D. PROPERTY, PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT





CORPORATE
OFFICES





We do not
own any real property.  We currently occupy our corporate headquarters
on a month to month basis at 11215 Jasper Avenue, Suite 505, Edmonton, Alberta
T5K 0L5.  We believe that our rented properties are adequate for our
current and immediately foreseeable operating needs.  We do not have
any policies regarding investments in real estate, securities or other forms of
property.





A
detailed description of the Company’s exploration properties with additional
information for the properties of major significance to the Company is outlined
below:





SOUTH VULTURE
PROPERTY





Acquisition
of Interest





On March
24, 2006, the Company executed a Property Option Agreement (the “Agreement”)
with Fred Brost (“Optionor”) granting the Company the right to a mineral
exploration permit covering mining interests in Arizona currently issued to the
Optionor.  The property, known as the South Vulture Property (the “SV
Property”), consists of an exploration permit covering approximately 560 acres
in Maricopa County, Arizona, approximately 16 miles southwest of Wickenburg,
Arizona.





The
Company may exercise the option by making cash payments totaling CDN $27,294
(USD $25,000) by March 24, 2010 and incurring net expenditures on the Property
of at least CDN $119,793 (USD $120,000) by March 24, 2010.  In order
to earn a 100% interest in the exploration permit covering the South Vulture
Property, the Company must pay Mr. Brost and incur expenditures relating to
mining operations in accordance with the following schedule:





The
Company must make the following payments and incur the exploration expenditures
as noted below in order to retain our interest in the South Vulture
Property:


16





Date
            
            Property
      Payments
            Exploration
      ExpendituresUpon
      execution of the agreement
            
            USD  $5,000
            -March
      24, 2007
            
            USD  $5,000
            USD  $10,000March
      24, 2008
            
            USD  $5,000
            USD  $20,000March
      24, 2009
            
            USD  $5,000
            USD  $40,000March
      24, 2010
            
            USD  $5,000
            USD  $50,000Total
            
            USD  $25,000
            USD  $120,000





The
Company paid the initial CDN $5,850 (USD $5,000) upon executing the agreement as
required under the initial Property Option Agreement and made the annual
payments of CDN $5,660 (USD $5,000) and CDN $5,870 (USD $5,000) due March 24,
2008 and 2007 respectively. The Company also met its obligation with respect to
minimum exploration expenditures for 2007.





The
Company must use Mr. Brost for his mineral exploration expertise on the SV
Property and Mr. Brost shall invoice the Company for work performed at
commercially competitive rates. All work performed on the SV Property will be
under the direction and at the discretion of the
Company.  Furthermore, both the Company and Mr. Brost have the right
to assign, sell, mortgage or pledge their rights in the Property Option
Agreement or on the SV Property. If the Company assigns or sells the SV
Property, Mr. Brost will be entitled to receive a payment equaling 5% of the
fair market value of the SV Property at the time of any such sale or
assignment.  In addition, any mineral interests staked, located,
granted or acquired by either party which is located within 2 miles of the SV
Property boundary will be included in the option granted to the
Company.





The
Agreement will terminate if the Company fails to comply with any of its
obligations in the Agreement and fails to cure such alleged breach. The Company
also has the right to terminate the Agreement by giving notice to Mr.
Brost.





We will
lose our option if we fail to make any payment according to schedule or if we
fail to incur the requisite expenditures prior to March 24 of any given year.
Any amounts paid to Mr. Brost are non-refundable.  If within 30 days
of receipt of a written notice from Fred Brost that a payment was not made in a
timely manner, we do not cure the default or give Mr. Brost notice that we deny
that such default has occurred, the option will terminate. If we give notice and
deny that a default has occurred, the option will not terminate until an Arizona
court determines that we are in default. In addition, we have the right to
terminate the Property Option Agreement at any time by giving notice of our
election to terminate.





Previous
Work





Freeport
McMoran Gold Company (“Freeport”) drilled 93 rotary-hammer holes on and
immediately adjacent to the property in 1984-1987.  Total length of
drilling was approximately 12,000 feet, with holes ranging in depth from 70 to
330 feet. This drilling indicated the presence of a large gold anomaly in
pre-Cambrian schist under an average of about 50 feet of
alluvium.  While the gold mineralization encountered was low grade,
Freeport identified a NW-trending fault running across the NE corner of the
property, with the portion of the property SW of the fault being dropped
down.  The significance of this fault, if any, is not
known.





During
2006 the Company completed a magnetic survey of the SV Property in order to help
define the intrusive boundaries of the property.  The survey covered a
rectangular area of about 1.45 km (0.9 miles) by 0.75 km (0.47 miles) and
consisted of 30 lines, approximately 0.75 km (0.47 miles) long and spaced 50
meters (164 feet) apart.  An interpretation of the data did not reveal
any specific targets but three areas were identified as being of interest for
future evaluation.





17


During
2007 the Company completed a gird-controlled Mobil Metal Ion (MMI)
survey.  A total of 180 soil samples were collected from a depth of
10-25 cm below the point at which soil formation was initiated. The samples were
taken in the southwest quarter of the property and covered an area 1,600 meters
by 1,900 meters.  Samples were bagged and shipped to SGS Laboratories
in Toronto, Ontario, Canada for analysis for the presence of 33 metallic
ions.  Analytical finish for all extractions was by inductively
coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).  Based on the results of
the MMI survey, the Company did not receive any clear direction as to potential
drill targets.  However, there was some good correlation between the
MMI study results and the location of drill holes completed by previous property
owners. The Company received a drilling budget from the property owner but did
not undertake a drill program in 2008





Termination
of Property Option Agreement





After
further review and consideration of all findings and relevant information
regarding the South Vulture Property, the Company chose to terminate the
Property Option Agreement by giving Mr. Fred Brost notice of our election to
terminate on February 24, 2009.  The Company does not maintain any
further rights, interests, or obligations in the property.





GQ
PROPERTY





Acquisition
of Interest





On June
1, 2006, the Company executed a Property Option Agreement with Warner Gruenwald
granting the Company the right to a 100% interest in a mineral exploration
property located in British Columbia, Canada. The property, known as the GQ
Property, consists of four claims and covers approximately 1,300 acres in the
Kamloops Mining District of British Columbia.





The
Company may exercise the option by making cash payments totaling CDN $100,000
and incurring net expenditures on the property of at least CDN $110,000 by June
1, 2010.  Minimum payments due under the Property Option Agreement are
summarized as follows:





Property
            
            ExplorationDate
            Payments
            
            ExpendituresJune
      1, 2007
            CDN
      $10,000
            
            CDN
      $10,000June
      1, 2008
            CDN
      $20,000
            
            CDN
      $20,000June
      1, 2009
            CDN
      $30,000
            
            CDN
      $30,000June
      1, 2010
            CDN
      $40,000
            
            CDN
      $50,000Total
            CDN
      $100,000
            
            CDN
      $110,000





The
Company made the $10,000 and $20,000 property payments on June 1, 2007 and 2008
respectively and also met its obligations for the minimum exploration
expenditures for 2007 and 2008. .  In 2009 the Company incurred
$45,877 in exploration expenditures; however, was in default of the $30,000 cash
payment due June 1, 2009.





The
Company must use Mr. Gruenwald for his mineral exploration expertise on the GQ
Property and he shall invoice the Company for work performed at commercially
competitive rates. All work performed on the GQ Property will be under the
direction and at the discretion of the Company.  Furthermore, both the
Company and Mr. Gruenwald have the right to assign, sell, mortgage or pledge
their rights in the Property Option Agreement or on the GQ
Property.  In addition, any mineral interests staked, located, granted
or acquired by either party that are located within two miles of the GQ Property
boundary will be included in the option granted to the Company.





18


The GQ
Property is subject to a 2% net smelter return (“NSR”)
royalty.  Should the Company obtain title to the GQ Property, the
Company will have the one-time right exercisable for 90 days following
completion of a bankable feasibility study to buy up to 50% of Mr. Gruenwald’s
NSR interest, an amount equal to 1% NSR, for CDN $500,000.





We will
lose our option if we fail to make any payment according to schedule or if we
fail to incur the requisite expenditures prior to June 1 of any given year. Any
amounts paid to Mr. Gruenwald are non-refundable.  If within 30 days
of receipt of a written notice from Warner Gruenwald that a payment was not made
in a timely manner, we do not cure the default or give Mr. Gruenwald notice that
we deny that such default has occurred, the option will terminate. If we give
notice and deny that a default has occurred, the option will not terminate until
and unless a single arbitrator in arbitration under the rules of The Arbitration
Act of British Columbia determines that we are in default. In addition, we have
the right to terminate the Property Option Agreement at any time by giving
notice of our election to terminate.





The GQ
Property is located 45 kilometers west-northwest of the community of Revelstoke
in southern British Columbia.  Access is via the Trans Canada highway
between Sicamous and Revelstoke and the Gorge Creek logging road near
Malakwa.  The gravel logging roads accessing the GQ Property are
regularly maintained.





Claim
Status





Originally,
the GQ Property encompassed 1,298 hectares (13 km2) and
was covered by the Province of British Columbia Mining Division tenure numbers
521731, 533372, 533373, and 533374 as legally registered to Warner
Gruenwald.  During 2006, the Company added two additional claims
contiguous to the north of the GQ Property (claims 553670 and 553669) which
added 709 hectares (7.09 km2).  The
new claims form part of the GQ Property Option Agreement.  The mining
claims give the holder the right to surface rights necessary for the prospecting
and exploration for minerals.





Property
Geology





The GQ
Property is situated in the rugged terrain of the Antsey Range along the west
flank of the Monashee Mountains.  The Monashee Mountain Range is
characterized by temperate climate and moderately high
precipitation.  Winter snow packs of 3 to 5 meters are not uncommon at
higher elevations.  The GQ Property and surrounding area is located
within the metamorphic, plutonic, and sedimentary rocks of the Omineca
Belt.  The area is underlain by a thick succession of metamorphic
rocks of the Shuswap and Monashee Complexes.  The Antsey granitic
pluton and related dykes, sills, and pegmatitic bodies intrude the metamorphic
rocks.  Several northwesterly trending linears (faults) are
interpreted to transect the GQ Property.  Local scale faults and
shears usually dip steeply to the west.  Mineralization occurs as
semiconformable lenses comprised of quartz, pyroxene, scapolite and fine-grained
sulphides.  Calc-silicate proximal to granitic intrusive rocks host
the majority of mineralization.  These host rocks strike northerly and
generally dip from 50 to 60 degrees west.  The showings often display
an unusual ‘granular texture’ with infillings of pyrrhotite, pyrite, minor
chalcopyrite, and scheelite.  Sulphide content ranges from 5 to
30%.  The showings appear to occur along specific stratigraphic
horizons (i.e cal-silicate) that are likely to be laterally
extensive.





Previous
Work





Prior to
1999, there was no evidence of mineral occurrences or records of work documented
on the GQ Property.  Between September 1999 and September 2000 a work
program consisting of stream sampling, prospecting, and soil and rock sampling
was undertaken.  A total of 53 stream silt, 46 panned concentrate, and
3 moss mat samples were collected from the GQ Property.  In addition,
a total of 46 rock and 30 soil samples were collected and submitted to
ALS-Chemex Labs for analysis.  The exploration program resulted in the
discovery of new mineral showings and anomalous drainages.  Anomalous
amounts of gold, bismuth, copper, tellurium and tungsten were found to be
present on the GQ Property.  Although very limited in scope, the
exploration program demonstrated the potential for intrusion related gold
deposits.








19





In 2006,
the Company completed another soil and rock sampling program.  A total
of 24 rock and 108 soil samples were collected and sent to Acme Analytical Labs
for analysis.  The rock and soil samples were analyzed for 36 elements
using Coupled Plasma – Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS).  The ICP-MS
technique is capable of ultra low detection limits in the parts per billion or
parts per trillion range.  The exploration program resulted in the
discovery of four new mineral showings and abundant mineralized float were
discovered.  As with prior sampling programs anomalous amounts of
gold, bismuth, copper, tellurium and tungsten were found to be present on the GQ
Property.  Evidence indicates the presence of at least four distinct
and separate mineralized calc-silicate “horizons” (SE Showing, Spur D, Spurs
A-B, and NE Showings) within a thick sequence of metamorphic
rocks.  The potential lateral and down dip extent of these horizons
along with the hydrothermal and possible mineralizing effects of the nearby
Antsey Pluton offer significant exploration potential.





The
Company completed a 2007 exploration program which was a follow up to the 2006
program.  The field work was conducted June 9 to 18 and September 4 to
5, 2007.  The first program consisted of grid based soil sampling and
magnetometer surveys along with prospecting, rock sampling and stream sampling
on the original claims.  The second program consisted of road based
soil sampling, prospecting, and rock sampling on the new claims acquired in
2006.  The geochemical aspect of the program covered three separate
grids totaling 5.6 kilometers consisting of chain and compass lines run at UTM
east-west orientation.  Magnetometer readings were taken at 12.5 meter
intervals over all grid lines (5.6 km) using a Geometrics G816
magnetometer.  A total of 40 rock, 318 soil, and 6 stream sediment
samples were collected and shipped to Acme Analytical Labs in Vancouver, British
Columbia, Canada.  Soil samples were analyzed for 36 elements using
ICP-MS.





The 2007
geochemical and magnetic surveys yielded similar results as those from 2006 in
that mineralization on the GQ Property occurs in four general areas on the
property. The 2007 geochemical and magnetic surveys indicated the potential for
the discovery of mineralized calc-silicate horizons in the SE Showing and Spur D
grid areas.  The known NE Showing bedrock occurrence and inferred
calc-silicate horizons in the Spur A-B also offer exploration
potential.





In 2008
the Company completed an exploration program which was a follow up to the 2007
program.  The field work was conducted in July and October
2008.  The first program consisted of grid based soil sampling in the
Spur A-B, Spur D grid and the SE areas.  The second program consisted
of bedrock trenching on Spur D and the SE areas and the construction of pads
along existing roads for future drilling.  The geochemical aspect of
the program established new, and extended existing grid lines totaling 1050
metres.  A total of 73 soil, 24 rock and 2 stream sediment samples
were collected and shipped to Acme Analytical and subsequently Assayers Canada
in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.  Soil samples were analyzed
for gold by fire assay methods and 35 elements using ICP-MS.





The 2008
geochemical work continues to demonstrate the presence and potential for the
discovery of mineralized calc-silicate horizons in several
areas.  Recent exploration points to the Spur D grid and SE area where
gold-in-soil anomalies and gold bearing float strongly suggest the presence of
more as yet undiscovered gold bearing horizons.  The known NE bedrock
occurrences and inferred calc-silicate horizons in the Spur A-B grid also offer
additional exploration potential.





20


In 2009,
a six hole 392.6 metre diamond drilling program focused on drill testing bedrock
and the source of the mineralized float occurrences in the Spur B and Spur D
trends and the SE area. Diamond drilling was a technical success in that
numerous calc-silicate horizons ranging from a few centimetres up to 13 metres
wide were intersected. Although not well mineralized the calc-silicate rocks
exhibit geochemistry similar to the bedrock and float mineralization. There is
little doubt that the numerous gold bearing float occurrences emanated from as
yet undiscovered calc-silicate horizons within the Second Creek valley. Because
the sources of the gold mineralized float are as yet undiscovered continued
exploration work is warranted. The absence of mineralized calc-silicate in the
2009 drill cores suggest that the source(s) of the numerous float occurrences
are more distal than previously thought. Prospecting further afield from the
goldbismuth- tellurium-tungsten mineralized float occurrences such as at Spur D
is recommended. Targeting sub alpine and alpine areas may prove useful since
glacial till and tree cover will be considerably less. MMI soil sampling
conducted along strategic logging roads will transect the metamorphic
stratigraphy and mineralized trends and may help locate the buried sources of
the mineralized float.





Termination
of Property Option Agreement





After
further review and consideration of all findings and relevant information
regarding the GQ Property, the Company chose to terminate the Property Option
Agreement by giving Mr. Warner Gruenwald notice of our election to terminate on
April 23, 2010.  The Company does not maintain any further rights,
interests, or obligations in the property.





MARGARITA
PROPERTY





Acquisition
of Interest





On July
14, 2006 the Company executed a Property Option Agreement with James Sorrell
granting the Company the right to acquire a 100% undivided interest in a mineral
exploration property covering mining interests in Arizona currently issued to
Mr. Sorrell.  The property, known as the Margarita Property,
originally consisted of 39 unpatented claims covering approximately 640 acres in
the Oro Blanco Mining District of Santa Cruz County, Arizona.





Also on
July 14, 2006 in relation to the Company entering into the Margarita Property
Option Agreement, the Company entered into a Finder’s Fee Agreement with Fred
Brost.  The Company has agreed to pay a fee equal to 10% of the
Property Option Payments made to James Sorrell during the first three years of
the Margarita Property Option Agreement.  It is estimated that if the
Company makes all of the scheduled property option payments to Mr. Sorrell, the
amount paid under the Finder’s Fee Agreement to Mr. Brost will be CDN $30,730
(USD $31,000).  If the Company terminates the Margarita Property
Option Agreement, the Company will not owe any further payments under the
Finder’s Fee Agreement.  If it has not been terminated earlier, the
Finder’s Fee Agreement will terminate automatically on July 14,
2009.





21


The
Company may exercise the option by making cash payments totaling CDN $862,208
(USD $860,000) by May 31, 2012 and incurring net expenditures on the Property of
at least CDN $675,405 (USD $675,000) by May 31, 2009.  Minimum
payments and expenditures due under the Agreement are summarized as
follows:





Property
            
            ExplorationDate
            Payments
            
            ExpendituresUpon
      execution of the agreement *
            USD
      $35,000
            
            -By
      May 31, 2007 *
            USD
      $50,000
            
            USD
      $75,000By
      May 31, 2008 *
            USD
      $100,000
            
            USD
      $300,000By
      May 31, 2009 *
            USD
      $125,000
            
            USD
      $300,000By
      May 31, 2010
            USD
      $150,000
            
            -By
      May 31, 2011
            USD
      $200,000
            
            -By
      May 31, 2012
            USD
      $200,000
            
            -Total
            USD
      $860,000
            
            USD
      $675,000









* In
addition to payments due under the Margarita Property Option Agreement, finder’s
fee payments of USD $3,500, USD $5,000, USD $10,000, and USD $12,500 are due
upon the execution of the agreement, May 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 respectively
if the Company makes the respective option payment.




Simultaneous
with the execution and delivery of the Margarita Property Option Agreement, the
Company paid James Sorrell CDN $39,300 (USD $35,000) and Mr. Brost CDN $3,930
(USD $3,500).  On May 31, 2007 the Company made the property option
payment of CDN $54,650 (USD $50,000) and the related finders’ fee payment of CDN
$5,465 (USD $5,000) and also met its obligations with respect to the minimum
exploration expenditures for 2007.




Since our
payment obligations are non-refundable, if we do not make any payments, we will
lose any payments made and all our rights to the Margarita Property. If all said
payments are made, then we will acquire all mining interests in the Property
subject to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty (“NSR”) retained by the
Optionor.  Within 90 days of completion of a bankable feasibility
study, the Company may purchase the NSR from the Optionor for CDN $495,650 (USD
$500,000) for each 1% of the NSR purchased (CDN $991,300 (USD $1,000,000) for
the Optionor’s entire 2% NSR).  If the Company fails to make any
payment when due, the Margarita Property Option Agreement gives the Company a
60-day grace period to pay the amount of the deficiency.




Furthermore,
both the Company and Mr. Sorrell have the right to assign, sell, mortgage or
pledge their rights in the Margarita Property Option Agreement or on the
Margarita Property. In addition, any mineral interests staked, located, granted
or acquired by either party which are located within 5 miles of the Margarita
Property boundary will be included in the option granted to the
Company.





The
Agreement will terminate if the Company fails to comply with any of its
obligations in the Agreement and fails to cure such alleged breach. The Company
also has the right to terminate the Agreement by giving notice to the
Optionor.





22


On
January 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Assignment and Assumption
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Patriot Gold Corp. (“Patriot”) to assign the
Company’s rights and obligations under the Margarita Property Option Agreement
to Patriot.  Pursuant to the Agreement, Patriot assumed the rights,
and agreed to perform all of the duties and obligations, of the Company arising
under the Margarita Property Option Agreement. Simultaneous with the execution
and delivery of the Agreement, Patriot paid the Company CDN $201,600 (USD
$200,000) which amount represents the full payment and satisfaction for the
assignment to Patriot by the Company.  Included in the assignment to
Patriot were, without limitation, all sums incurred by the Company in connection
with its exploration of the Margarita Property which includes the refunding of
the reclamation bond previously paid by the Company to the Forest Service in
Arizona, all expenditure credits incurred by the Company prior to the execution
of the Agreement and all property option payments made to the Margarita
Property. In addition, as the Company also assigned all of its rights and
obligations under the Finders’ Fee Agreement to Patriot, it is no longer
required to make further payments.  Subsequent to the execution of the
Agreement, the Company did not retain any interest in the Margarita
Property.





Claim
Status





The
Margarita Property consists of 69 unpatented claims covering approximately 1,180
acres in the Oro Blanco Mining District of Santa Cruz County,
Arizona.  The claims are within the Coronado National Forest, and are
approximately 10 miles north of the Mexican border.





Previous
Work





The
Margarita Property is centrally located within a broad area of numerous old
mines and prospects dating back to early Spanish colonial times where gold,
silver, lead and copper were mined from Mesozoic and early Tertiary igneous rock
units.  Previous work on the property appears to demonstrate the
presence of a zone at the Margarita Property of over 4,000 feet by 1,500 feet
encompassing half a million tons of altered and mineralized tuff in a flat lying
zone exhibiting gold mineralization.  The mineralization averages
between 0.05 and 0.06 troy ounces of gold per ton associated with intense
silicification and clay pyrite alteration.





The
previous work undertaken by the various explorers of the Margarita Property had
not previously been collected in one location.  During 2006, the
Company expended most of its exploration activity collecting property data from
various sources, preparing maps, and visiting the property to match the data
with physical observation.  Based on a review of all of the data
available to the Company, several possible drill targets were identified
including targets that were not located on the existing boundary of the
Margarita Property.  As a result, the Company staked an additional 30
claims.





The
Company formally approved a work plan for drilling on the Margarita
Property.  However, due to difficulties with locating a suitable
contractor to undertake the drilling and due to insufficient funds available to
the Company, the Company decided to assign its rights and obligations to the
property to Patriot Gold Corp.  Pursuant to the assignment, Patriot
assumed the rights, and agreed to perform all of the duties and obligations, of
the Company arising under the Margarita Property Option Agreement. Simultaneous
with the execution and delivery of the Agreement, Patriot paid the Company CDN
$201,600 (USD $200,000) which amount represents the full payment and
satisfaction for the assignment to Patriot by the Company.  Included
in the assignment to Patriot were, without limitation, all sums incurred by the
Company in connection with its exploration of the Margarita Property which
includes the refunding of the reclamation bond previously paid by the Company to
the Forest Service in Arizona, all expenditure credits incurred by the Company
prior to the execution of the Agreement and all property option payments made to
the Margarita Property. In addition, as the Company also assigned all of its
rights and obligations under the Finders’ Fee Agreement to Patriot, it is no
longer required to make further payments.  Subsequent to the execution
of the Agreement, the Company did not retain any interest in the Margarita
Property.








23


MAMMOTH
PROPERTY





Acquisition
of Interest





On July
15, 2009, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement with Peak
Geological Inc, giving the Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a
100% interest in a mineral exploration permit covering the Mammoth property
located in Prince George, BC.  The property, known as the Mammoth
Property, consists of 102 mineral tenure claims and covers approximately 47,000
hectares.  In addition, the Company is subject to a 2% net smelter
return royalty to the optioner upon production.





The
Company may exercise the option by making a cash payment of $60,000 upon signing
the Agreement, plus additional cash payments of $40,000, and incurring net
expenditures on the property of at least CDN$ 1,000,000 by April 1,
2013.  Minimum payments due under the Property Option Agreement are
summarized as follows:





Date
            Cash
      Payments
            ExpendituresCDN
            CDNJuly
      15, 2009
            $60,000On
      or before April 01, 2010
            $10,000
            $200,000On
      or before April 01, 2011
            $10,000
            $200,000On
      or before April 01, 2012
            $10,000
            $200,000On
      or before April 01, 2013
            $10,000
            $400,000





We will
lose our option if we fail to make any payment according to schedule or if we
fail to incur the requisite expenditures prior to April 1 of any given year. Any
amounts paid to Peak Geological Inc. are non-refundable.  If within 30
days of receipt of a written notice from Peak Geological Inc. that a payment was
not made in a timely manner, we do not cure the default or give Peak Geological
Inc. notice that we deny that such default has occurred, the option will
terminate. If we give notice and deny that a default has occurred, the option
will not terminate until and unless a single arbitrator in arbitration under the
rules of The Arbitration Act of British Columbia determines that we are in
default. In addition, we have the right to terminate the Property Option
Agreement at any time by giving notice of our election to
terminate.





The
Company paid the initial CDN $60,000 upon signing the agreement and has incurred
$70,000 in exploration expenses by December 31, 2009.  At June 25,
2010 the Company had a shortfall in property expenditures of $130,000 and cash
expenditures of $10,000 and is currently in default.  The Company is
at risk of losing its interest in the property by not making the indicated
option payments and incurring the exploration expenditures, when demanded.
Subsequent to year end, the Company did not fulfill its commitments under the
option agreement. However, the optioner agreed not to revoke the option
agreement at this time.





24


Location











25


The
Mammoth Property covers a large area northwest of Prince George, British
Columbia, Canada. The property overlies favourable bedrock geology within the
Quesnel Trough, a 1000 km long, north-northwesterly trending belt of rocks
hosting many copper ± gold ± molybdenum porphyry and copper ± gold skarn
deposits, including several past and presently producing mines. The belt has
been described as one of the most prospective geological areas in
Canada.  Access to the property is via a system of logging roads
extending from provincial highways 27, 16 and 97, connecting the nearby
communities of Prince George to the southeast (population 77,000), Vanderhoof to
the southwest (population 4800) and Fort St. James to the west (population
1976). Prince George is serviced regularly by commercial rail and
aircraft.





Claim
Status





The
Mammoth Property consists of 102 mineral tenure claims with the Province of
British Columbia, legally registered to Peak Geological Inc., covering
approximately 47,000 hectares in the Caribou Mining Division.  The
mining claims give the holder the right to surface rights necessary for the
prospecting and exploration for minerals.





Previous
Work





New
discoveries in the Lac La Hache, Kwanika-Mount Milligan and North Kemess areas,
and new deeper mineralization at Afton and Mount Polley mines, continue to
support interest in the Quesnel Trough. Exploration and discovery within the
Prince George portion of the belt, however, has historically been almost
non-existent, inhibited by a thick cover of unconsolidated Quaternary gravels
and related sediments.





The
Mammoth property overlies a variety of bedrock geological units. Based on very
limited outcrops exposures, float and rare drill holes, combined with
interpretation of regional geophysical information (primarily aeromagnetic data)
bedrock mappers from various organizations have extended the known bedrock units
from thin drift covered areas into thick drift areas.





Mineral
exploration within these thick overburden areas has been almost completely
absent because conventional exploration methods were considered inadequate and
extraction of any subsequently discovered ores deemed expensive due to costs of
removal of waste materials. New technology, methodology and improved metal
prices, together with the new geoscientific focus on this area, have advanced
the economic mineral potential of the area significantly.





The
existing gravity map is contoured from very sparse ground data, but formed the
basis for positioning the Mammoth Property.  Earlier staking by other
companies was positioned over magnetic total field anomalies. Some of these
claims may relate to younger, Chilcotin volcanic cover rocks, rather than
targets with economic potential. This data can be presented in alternate ways to
enhance trends and contrasts, as calculated magnetic vertical gradient and
shaded relief maps. New gravity The QUEST project (funded by the Province of
British Columbia) will collect new geophysical and geochemical data over a large
area, including the entire Mammoth property.  This survey data will
greatly improve resolution of density contrasts in the area.





Data from
these new surveys will provide the first “deeper” geophysical views of the
Mammoth property area, offering ability to measure conductivity and density
contrasts in bedrock below the overburden. The gravity patterns will be
delineated with much greater resolution by the new survey. In combination with
the existing regional aeromagnetic data, they will support reinterpretation of
regional bedrock geology, and may locate specific anomalies associated with
mineral deposits, such as those associated with Mount Milligan, Mount Polley and
many other porphyry deposits throughout the Quesnel Trough.





26


In late
2009 the Company acquired the services of Rob Shives from Gam-X Inc. and Warner
Gruenwald from Geoquest Consulting Ltd. to assess and conducted a small grass
roots exploration program.  The program consisted of geophysical
interpretation, targeting, grid design for mobile metal ion (MMI) sampling, 186
MMI samples collected and analyzed, as well as 189 meters of open hole RC
drilling and 73 meters of cased RC drilling completed to test the thickness of
the overburden.  MMI samples were sent to SGS Minerals for analysis
and drill samples were sent to Assayers Canada for
analysis.  Interpretation of the results are expected in the spring of
2010.





Planned
Work by the Company for 2010





We
anticipate that we will incur through the end of our next fiscal year in
connection with our current exploration plan for 2010:





·
            $130,000
      in connection with exploration expenditures and $10,000 for property
      option payments for the Mammoth
Property;





As of
June 25, 2010, the Company does not have the necessary funding to participate in
its exploration plan for 2010. If funding was to be obtained, the Company would
move forward with an exploration budget based on the results and recommendations
of the pending assessment report.








ITEM
4A.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS





Not
applicable.





ITEM 5.  OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS





The
following discussion for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007,
2006, and 2005 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of
the Company and the notes thereto.





Certain
statements contained in the foregoing MD&A and elsewhere in this 20-F
constitute forward-looking statements.  Such forward-looking
statements involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the
Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the
financial statements were made, and readers are advised to consider such
forward-looking statements in light of the risks set forth in section 3.D.
above.





27




OVERALL
PERFORMANCE





The
following table sets forth the audited statement of operations data for Rush
Metals Corp. (formerly American Goldrush Corp.) for the fiscal years
indicated:





Table
No. 3





2009
            
            
            2008
            
            
            2007
            
            
            2006
            
            
            2005Revenue
            
            $
            Nil
            
            
            $
            Nil
            
            
            $
            Nil
            
            
            $
            Nil
            
            
            $
            NilExpenses
            
            $
            253,756
            
            
            $
            54,979
            
            
            $
            351,943
            
            
            $
            1,945,540
            
            
            $
            101,396Loss
      from operations
            
            $
            (253,316
            )
            
            $
            (54,979
            )
            
            $
            (351,943
            )
            
            $
            (1,945,540
            )
            
            $
            (101,396
            )Net
      loss and Other Comprehensive Loss
            
            $
            (268,316
            )
            
            $
            (23,415
            )
            
            $
            (346,255
            )
            
            $
            (1,946,089
            )
            
            $
            (102,926
            )Net
      loss per share:Basic
      and diluted
            
            $
            0.01
            
            
            $
            0.00
            
            
            $
            0.01
            
            
            $
            0.05
            
            
            $
            0.00Weighted
      average number of
              common
      shares outstanding
            
            
            41,823,509
            
            
            
            41,613,920
            
            
            
            41,613,920
            
            
            
            40,997,133
            
            
            
            39,557,350








Results
of Operations of Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008





We are a
natural resource exploration company in the exploration stage with an objective
of acquiring, exploring, and, if warranted and feasible, developing natural
resource properties.  Natural resource exploration and development
requires significant capital and our assets and resources are limited.
Therefore, we participate in the natural resource industry through the optioning
of natural resource exploration and development projects.





Revenue
- Cost of Revenue





We did
not earn any revenues during the years ended December 31, 2009 or
2008.  We do not anticipate earning revenues until such time as we
have entered into commercial production of our mineral properties. We can
provide no assurance that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of
mineral resources on our properties, or if such resources are discovered, that
we will enter into commercial production of our mineral properties.





28


General
and Administrative Expenses





The net
loss in 2009 was $268,316 compared to $23,415 in 2008.  The increase
in the loss of $244,901 in 2009 compared to 2008 is primarily related to the
increase of mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures. In 2009,
there was an increase of $176,895 in mineral property acquisition and
exploration expenditures compared to a recovery of $130,685 in 2008. The
recovery in 2008 was a result of an option payment received on its Margarita
property of $183,640. No receipt of options were received in 2009. The 2009
mineral property and acquisition expenditures increase is mainly due to the
property option’s cash payment and exploration expenditures of $130,000 for the
Mammoth property as well as $46,895 in exploration expenditures for the GQ
property. Another factor leading to the increase in loss is the reduction of
general and administrative expenses to $5,383 in 2009 from
$12,802.  In addition, director’s fees decreased to $Nil in 2009 from
$6,128 in 2008 lower director fees.  The increase in expenses was also
offset by a reduction in share based and stock-based compensation of $42,167 in
2009 from $125,012 in 2008.





Results
of Operations of Fiscal 2008 vs. Fiscal 2007





We are a
natural resource exploration company in the exploration stage with an objective
of acquiring, exploring, and, if warranted and feasible, developing natural
resource properties.  Natural resource exploration and development
requires significant capital and our assets and resources are limited.
Therefore, we participate in the natural resource industry through the optioning
of natural resource exploration and development projects.





Revenue
- Cost of Revenue





We did
not earn any revenues during the years ended December 31, 2008 or
2007.  We do not anticipate earning revenues until such time as we
have entered into commercial production of our mineral properties. We can
provide no assurance that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of
mineral resources on our properties, or if such resources are discovered, that
we will enter into commercial production of our mineral properties.





General
and Administrative Expenses





The net
loss in 2008 was $23,415 compared to $346,255 in 2007.  The decrease
in the loss of $322,840 in 2008 compared to 2007 is primarily related to the
sale of the Margarita Property, the termination of the South Vulture Property
and a reduced exploration program for the GQ Property and gifting of shares
between a former director and our current officer and director of the Company.
In 2008 the mineral property acquisition and exploration expendituresfor the Margarita
Property were ($176,228) compared to $172,777 in 2007.  The South
Vulture Property’s expenditures in 2008 were $16,171 compared to $33,852 in
2007.  The GQ Property’s expenditures were $29,372 in 2008 compared to
$45,063 in 2007.  Another factor leading to the decreased loss was a
reduction in stock-based compensation to $12,882 in 2008 from $41,107 in
2007.  On the South Vulture, the Company completed an exploration
program in 2007, but did not in 2008 as the previous results indicated the lack
of conclusive results. The property option agreement was terminated in
2009.  For the GQ Property, exploration programs were completed in
2008 and 2007.  However, the revised 2008 GQ budget was significantly
lower than originally proposed, as well as the 2007 budget.  For the
Margarita Property, due to difficulties with locating a suitable contractor to
undertake the drilling and due to insufficient funds available to the Company,
the Company decided to assign its rights and obligations to the property to
Patriot Gold Corp in January 2008.  In 2007 the Company incurred the
costs for the preparation for the planned drill program and formally approved a
work plan for drilling on the Margarita Property.   During the
year, our former director has gifted a total of 30 million of common shares of
the Company to an officer and a director of the Company with a value of $112,130
which offset the expense reduction compared to 2007.





29


5.B.  Liquidity
and capital resources





Liquidity





The
funding of our operations since inception has come from the following
sources.  On October 30, 2003, we closed a private placement with six
investors for the sale of 9,500,000 units, which generated gross proceeds to us
of CDN $95,000. On January 28, 2004, we closed a private placement with
thirty-eight Canadian investors for the sale of 57,350 Common shares, for total
gross proceeds of CDN $5,735. Between March and August 2005 we received a total
of $71,139 in proceeds from three separate bridge loans from three minority
shareholders.   On June 16, 2006 we completed a sale of units of
the Company for total proceeds of CDN $550,000 and during 2006 we received CDN
$56,250 from the exercise of 225,000 stock options.





On
January 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Assignment and Assumption
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Patriot Gold Corp. (“Patriot”) to assign the
Company’s rights and obligations under the Margarita Property Option Agreement
to Patriot.  Pursuant to the Agreement, Patriot assumed the rights,
and agreed to perform all of the duties and obligations, of the Company arising
under the Margarita Property Option Agreement. Simultaneous with the execution
and delivery of the Agreement, Patriot paid the Company CDN $201,600 (USD
$200,000) which amount represents the full payment and satisfaction for the
assignment to Patriot by the Company.  Included in the assignment to
Patriot were, without limitation, all sums incurred by the Company in connection
with its exploration of the Margarita Property which includes the refunding of
the reclamation bond previously paid by the Company to the Forest Service in
Arizona, all expenditure credits incurred by the Company prior to the execution
of the Agreement and all property option payments made to the Margarita
Property. In addition, as the Company also assigned all of its rights and
obligations under the Finders’ Fee Agreement to Patriot, it is no longer
required to make further payments.  Subsequent to the execution of the
Agreement, the Company did not retain any interest in the Margarita
Property.





On
October 9, 2009 we received $50,000 CDN$ in proceeds from the exercise of
warrants.





On
October 22, 2009 we received $50,000 CDN$ in proceeds from the exercise of
warrants.





We are a
natural resource exploration company with an objective of acquiring, exploring,
and if warranted and feasible, developing natural resource
properties.  Our primary focus in the natural resource sector is
gold.





We have
members on our board of directors who have extensive experience in the natural
resource industry. However, exploration activities of properties without any
proven reserves require a considerable amount of time and money, and the
subsequent return on investment for our shareholders would be very long term
indeed.  Should we make a finding of minerals on any of our properties
we would consider our alternatives to such finding, including the possibility of
selling any findings to a major mining company. By selling its findings to
another mining company, it would provide an immediate return to our shareholders
without the long time frame and cost of putting a mine into operation ourselves,
and it would also provide future capital for the company to continue
operations.





During
2009 and 2008 our operations were funded from the proceeds of warrant exercises
on October 9, 2009 for CDN $50,000 and on October 22, 2009 for CDN $50,000, as
well as the assignment of the Margarita Property to Patriot Gold Corp. on
January 29, 2008 for CDN $201,600 (USD $200,000).  We do not have
sufficient cash to fund our minimum obligations for the next twelve
months.  We expect to continue to finance operations through the sale
of equity.  However, there is no guarantee that we will be successful
in arranging financing on acceptable terms.





30


During
2009 cash used in operating activities was $226,613 compared to cash provided by
operating activities of $95,719 in 2008, an change of $322,332.  We
had a net loss of $268,316 in 2009 compared to a loss of $23,415 in 2008
primarily due to the increase of mineral property acquisition and exploration
expenditures and no receipt of option payments in 2009.  The non-cash
effects of share-based and stock-based compensation decreased to $42,167 in 2009
from $125,012 in 2008.  Also, in 2009 we had a cash inflow from
accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $1,350 compared to cash outflow of
$8,108 in 2008.





In 2009,
we have cash inflows of $Nil from investing activities, and in 2008, we had
$17,894 from investing activities.  Investing activities in 2008
related to a return in the reclamation deposits for the Margarita and South
Vulture Properties.





In 2009,
we have cash inflows of $100,000 from financing activities. These proceeds
resulted from cash payments on exercise of 1,000,000 warrants in October 2009.
In 2008 and 2007, cash inflows from financing activities were $nil.





During
2008 cash provided by operating activities was $95,719 compared to cash used by
operating activities of $335,103 in 2007, a change of $430,822.  We
had a net loss of $23,415 in 2008 compared to a loss of $346,255 in 2007
primarily due to the sale of the Margarita Property for $201,600 and the
resulting reduction in cash commitments.  The non-cash effect was that
stock-based compensation decreased to $12,882 in 2008 from $41,107 in 2007 and
share-based compensation increased to $112,130 from $nil in 2007.  The
share-based compensation was primarily due to the gifting of shares between a
former officer/director and our officer and a director of the
Company.  Also, in 2008 we had a cash outflow from accounts payable
and accrued liabilities of $8,108 compared to $28,767 in 2007.





In 2008
we have cash inflows of $17,894 from investing activities, and in 2007, we have
used $17,894 for investing activities.  Investing activities in 2007
related to the payment of reclamation deposits on the Margarita (2007) and the
South Vulture (2006) Properties.  In 2008 these reclamation deposits
were returned to the Company.  There were no financing activities in
2008 and 2007.





We had
cash and cash equivalents of $41,659 as of December 31, 2009.  We
anticipate that we will incur through the end of our next fiscal
year:





·
            $130,000
      in connection with exploration expenditures and $10,000 for property
      option payments for the Mammoth
Property;





·
            $39,600
      for operating expenses, including working capital and general,
      administrative and professional legal and accounting expenses associated
      with being a reporting issuer under the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934.





At
December 31, 2009 we had working capital of $26,021.  The resulting
increase in cash commitments related to the Mammoth Property will not allow us
to fund a minimum level of operations for the next twelve months without
additional funding.





We
anticipate that our cash requirements to carry out planned exploration of our
property and to cover administrative costs will be approximately $179,600
through December 31, 2010. We shall require additional funding for our minimum
obligations under existing property agreements, and to expand our
operations.  We anticipate that such funding will be in the form of
equity financing from the sale of our common stock.  However, we
cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise
sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund additional phases
of the exploration programs, should we decide to proceed.  We believe
that debt financing will not be an alternative for funding any further phases in
our exploration program.  The risky nature of this enterprise and lack
of tangible assets places debt financing beyond the credit-worthiness required
by most banks or typical investors of corporate debt until such time as an
economically viable mine can be demonstrated.  We do not have any
arrangements in place for any future equity financing.





31


Critical
accounting estimates





The
preparation of the Company's financial statements requires management to make
estimates and assumptions regarding future events. These estimates and
assumptions affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities, and
disclosure of contingent liabilities.





Significant
areas requiring the use of management estimates include the variables used in
determining stock-based compensation and the fair value of the shares in
connection with the gifting of shares, and the loss on the settlement of the
bridge loans. These estimates are based on management's best judgment. Factors
that could affect these estimates include option term and expected
volatility.





Management
has made significant assumptions and estimates determining the fair market value
of stock-based compensation granted to employees and non-employees as well as
determining the fair market value of the share purchase warrants issued upon the
settlement of the bridge loans.  These estimates have an effect on the
stock-based compensation and the loss on bridge loan conversion expenses
recognized and the contributed surplus and share capital balances on the
Company’s Balance Sheet.  The value of each option award is estimated
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions,
including the expected term of the option award and stock price volatility. The
expected term of options granted for the purposes of the Black-Scholes
calculation is the term of the award since all grants are to non-employees.
Because our common stock has not yet traded yet, the expected volatility is
based on comparable junior mining companies who granted similar term
options.  In addition, determining the fair value of our shares
requires management to consider factors that require other than share price
since a public quotation of our shares is not available.  These
estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management
judgment. An expected forfeiture rate of nil was used in the recognition of the
compensation and loss expenses for those options and warrants not yet vested at
December 31, 2009.





Management
has estimated the fair value of the shares in connection with the gifting of the
shares based on the estimated fair value of net assets at the date of the shares
being transferred.





5.C.  Research and
development, patents and licenses etc.





---
Not applicable ---





5.D.  Trends.





---
No Disclosure Necessary ---





5.E.  Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements.





We do not
have any off balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008 or of the date of this report.





32


5.F.  Contractual
Obligations.





We have
the following contractual obligations at December 31, 2009 as expressed in CDN
dollars:





Contractual
      Obligations
              
              Total
              
              
              Payments
      Due By PeriodLess
      than 1 Year
              
              
              1 –
      3 Years
              
              
              3 –
      5 Years
              
              
              More
      than 5 yearsProperty
      payments
              
              $
              40,000
              
              
              $
              10,000
              
              
              $
              30,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -Property
      expenditures
              
              $
              930,000
              
              
              $
              130,000
              
              
              $
              800,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -$
              970,000
              
              
              $
              140,000
              
              
              $
              830,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -




At
December 31, 2009 the Company also had $5,636 in trade accounts
payable.  The balance is unsecured.    As the
Company has decided not to continue with the GQ property subsequent to December
31, 2009, the cash payments and expenditures amounts have been excluded from the
contractual obligations noted above.





Recent Accounting
Pronouncements Applicable to US





Recently
issued United States accounting pronouncements have been outlined
below.





ASC 805





On
February 1, 2009, the Company adopted the changes issued by FASB ASC topic 805
for business combinations. These changes require an acquirer to recognize the
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in
the acquired business at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as
of that date, with limited exceptions. This statement also requires the acquirer
in a business combination achieved in stages to recognize the identifiable
assets and liabilities, as well as the non-controlling interest in the acquired
business, at the full amounts of their fair values. ASC 805 makes various other
amendments to authoritative literature intended to provide additional guidance
or to confirm the guidance in that literature to that provided in this
statement. Our adoption of the changes to ASC 805 had no impact on the Company’s
financial statements. However, we expect the changes to ASC 805 will have an
impact on our accounting for future business combinations, but the effect is
dependent upon making acquisitions in the future.





In April
2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, that
clarifies and amends ASC 805, as it applies to all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies.
This update addresses initial recognition and measurement issues, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosures regarding these assets and
liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. The Company
adopted this Statement on January 1, 2009. Implementation of this update to ASC
805 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.





33


ASC 815





In June
2008, the FASB ratified FASB ASC 815-40 (EITF Issue 07-5 (EITF 07-5), -
Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an
Entity’s Own Stock). FASB ASC 815-40 provides that an entity should use a two
step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or
embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the
instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. It also clarifies
the impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based
employee stock option valuation instruments. FASB ASC 815-40 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those
years. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted this pronouncement. There was no
material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.





In March
2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)-Scope Exception Related to
Embedded Credit Derivatives.This ASU removes a
scope exception, and an entity that has a beneficial interest in securitized
financial assets that includes a credit derivative feature must evaluate that
feature for bifurcation from the host financial asset in accordance with the
guidance at ASC 815. ASU 2010-11 is effective at the beginning of a reporting
entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted at the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after
March 5, 2010. We do not expect that the adoption of ASU 2010-11 will have a
material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.





ASC 855





In May
2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”. This Statement
addresses accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance
sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued.
FASB ASC 855 requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has
evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, the date issued or date
available to be issued. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods ended after June 15, 2009 and is to be applied
prospectively.  The Company’s adoption of the new guidance did not
have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.





In
February, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855)
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.The amendments remove
the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date in both issued and revised
financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements
revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective
application of U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the Board has clarified that if the
financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer
should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or
available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued
or available to be issued. Those amendments remove potential conflicts with the
SEC's literature. All of the amendments in this Update are effective upon
issuance of the final Update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit
debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending
after June 15, 2010.





34


ASU No.
2009-05





In August
2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-05 for changes to
measuring liabilities at fair value. These changes clarify existing guidance
that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair
value using either a valuation technique that uses a quoted price of either a
similar liability or a quoted price of an identical or similar liability when
traded as an asset, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of fair value measurements, such as an income approach (For example,
present value technique). This guidance also states that both a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability and a quoted price for the
identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no
adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value
measurements. These changes become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010.
The Company does not anticipate the adoption of these changes will have an
impact on the Company’s financial statements.





ASU No.
2009-06





In
September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-06, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) –
Implementation Guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and
Disclosure Amendments for Nonpublic Entities.  This update is to
address the need for additional implementation guidance on accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes.  The implementation guidance will apply
to financial statements on nongovernmental entities that are presented in
conformity with U.S. GAAP.  The effective date is for entities that
are currently applying the standards for accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes, the guidance and disclosure amendments are effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009.  For those entities that have deferred the application of
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with paragraph
740-10-65-1(e), the guidance and disclosure amendments are effective upon
adoption of those standards.  The adoption of this standard did not
have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.





ASU No.
2009-9





In
September 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-09, “Accounting for Investments –
Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to
Non-Employees.  This update is an amendment to ASC 323-10-S99 and
505-50-S99.  The amendment to ASC 323-10-S99 provides guidance on the
accounting by an investor for stock-based compensation based on the investor’s
stock granted to employees of an equity method investee.  Investors
that are SEC registrants should classify any income or expense resulting from
application of this guidance in the same income statement caption as the equity
in earnings (or losses) of the investee.  The amendment to ASC
505-50-S99 clarifies the accounting by the grantee or grantor in transactions
involving equity instruments granted to other than employees if the accounting
does not reflect the same commitment date or similar values and is effective
September 17, 2009.  The adoption of this standard did not have a
material effect on the Company’s financial statements.





35


ASC 105





On
October 31, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 105 -- Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, which established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“the Codification”), as the single official source of
authoritative, nongovernmental, U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal
securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The
FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead, the FASB will issue
Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will not be
authoritative in their own right, as they will only serve to update the
Codification. These changes and the Codification itself do not change GAAP. The
Codification is designed to simplify U.S. GAAP into a single, topically ordered
structure. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of
authority. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company refers to the Codification in
respect of the appropriate accounting standards throughout this document as
“FASB ASC”. Other than the manner in which new accounting guidance is
referenced, the adoption of these changes had no impact on the Company’s
financial statements.





ASU No.
2009-17





In
December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17 for Improvements to Financial
Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, which amends
ASC topic 810. The Board's objective in issuing this Statement is to improve
financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. The
Board undertook this project to address (1) the effects on certain provisions of
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, as a result of the elimination of the qualifying
special-purpose entity concept in FASB Statement 166, Accounting for Transfers
of Financial Assets, and (2) constituent concerns about the application of
Certain key provisions of Interpretation 46(R), including those in which the
accounting and disclosures under the Interpretation do not always provide timely
and useful information about an enterprise's involvement in a variable interest
entity. This Statement shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting
entity's first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for
interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and
annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. We do
not anticipate the adoption of these changes will have an impact on the
Company’s financial statements.





ASU No.
2010-01





In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01 “Accounting for Distributions to
Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash” with Equity (Topic
505).  The objective of this update is to address diversity in
practice related to the accounting for a distribution to shareholders that
offers them the ability to elect to receive their entire distribution in cash or
shares of equivalent value with a potential limitation on the total amount of
cash that shareholders can elect to receive in
aggregate.  Historically, some entities have accounted for the stock
portion of the distribution as a new share issuance that is reflected in
earnings per share (“EPS”) prospectively.  Other entities have
accounted for the stock portion of the distribution as a stock dividend by
retroactively restating shares outstanding and EPS for all periods
presented.  The amendments in this update clarify that the stock
portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive
cash or shares with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all
shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share
issuance, rather than a stock dividend, thus eliminating the diversity in
practice.  The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and
annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a
retrospective basis.  The adoption of ASU 2010-01 did not have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements.





36


ASU No.
2010-06





In
January, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 on codification, Fair value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820-10), improving disclosures about fair
value measurements.  This update provides amendments to Topic 820 that
will provide more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets
and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs
used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers
between Level 1, 2, and 3.  The standard adds new disclosure and
clarifies existing disclosure requirements.  The new standard requires
disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods of publicly traded companies in addition to the annual disclosure
required at year-end.  The provisions of the new standard are
effective for the interim periods ending after June 15, 2009.  The
adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial statements.







ITEM
6.  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT, AND EMPLOYEES







6.A.  Directors
and Senior Management





Table
No. 4


Directors
and Senior Management


June
25, 2010








Name
            Position
            Age
            Date
      of
              First
      Election
              Or
      AppointmentPaul
      Noland
            Director,
      Chairman, President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer and
      Secretary
            62
            September
      13, 2008Keith
      Diakiw
            Director
            37
            September
      9, 2008Robert
      Coale
            Director
            70
            September
      12, 2008Paul
      Uppal
            Director
            57
            June
      30, 2009Pol
      Brisset
            Director
            34
            June
      30, 2009








The
business address of our officers and directors is c/o American Goldrush
Corporation, Suite 505 – 11215 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5K
0L5.





Our
directors hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until
their successors are duly elected and qualified.  Set forth below is a
summary description of the principal occupation and business experience of each
of our directors and executive officers for at least the last five
years.





Paul D. Noland, age 62, has
been a Director and our Chairman, President, Chief Executive and Operating
Officer and Secretary since September 2008.  Mr. Noland graduated from
Lamar University with a B.S. in Geology in 1971, and has over 35 years
experience as a professional geologist, primarily in the western
US.   He has held senior positions at Inspiration, Noranda,
Independence Mining, Placer Dome and Barrick.  His most recent
corporate position was with Barrick at the Cortez, Nevada Mines, where he was
involved with both the Pipeline and newly discovered Cortez Hills
deposits.





37


Mr.
Noland has interspersed corporate positions with extended periods as a
consultant, primarily focused on exploration and property
evaluation.  Through his long and successful career in mining, Mr.
Noland has been involved in several mineral discoveries.  His
experience has spanned grass-roots exploration and evaluation of prospects to
development and enhancement of multi-million ounce gold deposits. Though the
majority of Mr. Noland’s expertise lies in precious metals deposits, he has also
been involved with exploration and discovery of copper, molybdenum and
tungsten.





Robert Coale, age 70, has been
a Director of Rush Metals Corp. (formerly American Goldrush Corp.) since
September 2008.  He has also been a Director of Patriot Gold Corp., a
publicly traded mineral exploration company since June 2003.  He is a
Professional Engineer with two engineering degrees (1963 - MetE. - Colorado
School of Mines, 1971 - MSc. - University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa)
and an MBA from the University of Minnesota (1982) and has over 45 years of
resource related business and management experience.   Mr. Coale
is currently an independent consulting engineer specializing in mineral
processing and natural gas fueling systems including development of projects for
converting low-grade or stranded natural gas sources into liquefied natural
gas.





Keith Diakiw, age 37, has
served as a Director of the Company since September 2008 and is a professional
geologist who has field experience in Canada and Brazil.  Mr. Diakiw is
currently working as a Production Geologist for Canadian Natural Resources
Ltd. in Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada.  From 2005 to 2006 he was
employed by Wellsite Masters Ltd. as a Well Site Geologist for an oil sands
drilling program.  From 2003 to 2004, he worked as a Field Engineer for
Schlumberger D&M in Brazil on offshore platforms, while in 2003, he was
employed by EnCana Corporation as a Contract Geologist and successfully
completed his NW Alberta shallow gas play project.  Prior to 2003, Mr.
Diakiw was attending the University of Alberta where he successfully earned a
Bachelor of Science with Specialization (Geology) in 2003 and a Bachelor of
Arts (anthropology/archaeology) in 2002.  Furthermore, Mr. Diakiw
began his university career at the University of Lethbridge and successfully
earned a Bachelor of Science (Physical Geography) in 1996 and was U of L’s first
Arts & Science CO-OP degree graduate.  Mr. Diakiw is a member of
several professional organizations including the Association of Professional
Engineers, Geologists, and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA), the Canadian
Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum (CIM), and the Canadian Society
of Petroleum Geologists (CSPG).





Paul Uppal, age 57, has served
as a Director of the Company since June 2009 and has been an entrepreneur since
1971.  He started in the family sawmill business,
Goldwood Industries, and then branched off into the pub business for 16
years.  Subsequently, he became a licensed realtor and builder of
residential real estate, which transgressed into the hotel industry as an
owner/operator.   He recently built a 230 seat resto/lounge which
he currently operates with his two sons.  Mr. Uppal has served as a
Director/Chairman of the North Fraser Port Authority and also a Director/CEO of
Power Oil & Gas Inc., a publicly traded natural gas exploration
company.





Pol Brisset, age 34 has served
as a Director of the Company since June 2009 and has worked as a finance &
marketing professional for international corporations such as Molson-Coors and
Heineken. His knowledge and experience in strategy development, business
operations and team dynamics are of specific importance to Strata. Mr. Brisset
is fluent in both English and French. He holds an MBA degree from the University
of Calgary, and also a business degree from the University of Quebec at
Montreal.





We are
not aware of any material legal proceedings that have occurred within the past
five years concerning any director, director nominee, or control person which
involved a criminal conviction, a pending criminal proceeding, a pending or
concluded administrative or civil proceeding limiting one's participation in the
securities or banking industries, or a finding of securities or commodities law
violations.





There are
no family relationships between any two or more Directors or Senior
Management.





There are
no arrangements or understandings with major shareholders, customers, suppliers
or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a
Director or member of senior management.





38


6.B.  Compensation





Cash
Compensation





With the
exception of Richard Kehmeier, none of our officers or directors have received
or earned any compensation or bonus for services rendered in the 2009 or
2008.  Commencing December 2005 and ending on December 31, 2008, Mr.
Kehmeier has received USD $500 per month to serve as a Director of the
Company.  During the year, Mr. Kehmeier resigned as a
Director.  During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,
compensation payments made to our Directors was $Nil.





We do not
maintain key-man life insurance for any of our executive officers or
directors.





Table
No. 5


Outstanding
Equity Awards as at December 31, 2009


Name
              Number
      of Options Granted
              Exercise
      Price per Option
              Grant
      Date
              Expiration
      Date
              Mkt.
      Value of Securities Underlying Options on Date of Grant
              Number
      of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options, Exercisable
              Number
      of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options,
Unexercisable
              Grant
      Date Fair Value of Stock Options(1)Paul
      Noland
              Nil
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -Robert
      Coale(2)
              25,000
              $0.25
              11/1/05
              11/28/15
              $0.10
              25,000
              -
              $1,775Keith
      Diakiw
              Ni
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -Paul
      Uppal
              Ni
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -Pol
      Brisset
              Ni
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -
              -




(1) The
figures in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock option
grants as determined using the Black-Scholes model. For more information
regarding the assumptions used to value stock option grants, please refer to
note 7(b) of the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 filed with this Form 20-F.





(2) Mr.
Coale was granted 100,000 options November 1, 2005.  50,000 options
vested immediately and 50,000 vested November 1, 2006.  On July 1,
2006 75,000 options were canceled. Mr. Coale was appointed to the Board of
Directors on September 12, 2008.





No stock
options were granted to officers or directors in 2009 or 2008.  No
Officer or Director has ever exercised stock options granted to them by the
Company.





Change of Control
Remuneration.





The
Company had no plans or arrangements in respect of remuneration received or that
may be received by Executive Officers of the Company in Fiscal 2009 to
compensate such officers in the event of termination of employment (as a result
of resignation, retirement, change of control) or a change of responsibilities
following a change of control.





6.C.  Board
Practices





6.C.1.  Terms of
Office.





Refer to
ITEM 6.A.1.





39


6.C.2.  Directors’
Service Contracts.





With the
exception of Richard Kehmeier, there are no Director Service
contracts.  Pursuant to an agreement dated December 2005, between the
Company and Mr. Kehmeier, commencing December 2005 and ending on December 31,
2008, Mr. Kehmeier has received USD $500 per month to serve as a Director of the
Company.  Mr. Kehmeier’s service contract was terminated on June 30,
2009 due to his resignation to serve as a Director of the Company.





6.C.3.  Board of
Director Committees.





The Audit
Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the
Company and all audits and external reviews of the financial statements of the
Company on behalf of the Board, and has general responsibility for oversight of
internal controls, accounting and auditing activities of the Company. The
Committee reviews, on a continuous basis, any reports prepared by the Company's
external auditors relating to the Company's accounting policies and procedures,
as well as internal control procedures and systems. The Committee is also
responsible for examining all financial information, including annual financial
statements, prepared for securities commissions and similar regulatory bodies
prior to filing or delivery of the same. The Audit Committee also oversees the
annual audit process, the Company's internal accounting controls, any complaints
and concerns regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters and the
resolution of issues identified by the Company's external auditors. The Audit
Committee recommends to the Board the firm of independent auditors to be
nominated for appointment by the shareholders and the compensation of the
auditors. The Audit Committee meets on an as needed basis.





Until
September 2008 the Company’s Audit Committee consists of the following three
directors, all of who are financially literate and knowledgeable about the
Company’s affairs: Mr. Gourlay, Mr., Cann and Mr. Praill.  Mr. Scott
Praill is the audit committee’s financial expert member as a qualified
accountant with 10 years experience in the mining industry. As of September 2008
the Board of Directors is empowered to appoint a new audit committee for the
Corporation and will function as our audit committee until one is
appointed.There
are no current audit committee members and our Board of Directors has determined
that it does not have a member of the audit committee that qualifies as an
“audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 401(e) of Regulation
S-K.  See Item 16A below.





6.D.  Employees





We have
no employees at this time. We utilize outside contractors where possible, and
rely on the industry expertise of management and our Board of Directors. These
contractors will be responsible for surveying, geology, engineering,
exploration, and excavation. The geologists will evaluate the information
derived from the exploration and excavation and the engineers will advise us on
the economic feasibility of removing the mineralized material. No member of our
management team is presently employed by us.  We do not foresee any
significant changes in the number of employees or consultants we will have over
the next twelve months, unless the growth of our business demands
it.





6.E.  Share
Ownership





Table No.
6 lists, as of June 25, 2010 Directors and Senior Management who beneficially
own the Company's voting securities, consisting solely of common shares and the
amount of the Company's voting securities owned by the Directors and Senior
Management as a group.





40


Table
No. 6


Shareholdings
of Directors and Senior Management








Title
      of Class
            Name
      of Beneficial Owner
            Amount
      and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
            Percent
      of Class(3)Common
            Paul
      Noland          (1)
            14,000,000
            32.9%Common
            Robert
      Coale
            -
            *Common
            Keith
      Diakiw
            -
            *Common
            Paul
      Uppal            (2)
            16,000,000
            37.5%Common
            Pol
      Brisset
            -
            *Common
            Total
      Directors / Senior Management
            30,000,000
            70.4%





*
Represents less than 1%.





(1)
            14,000,000
      of the shares owned by Mr. Noland are subject to our option to purchase
      all or any portion of these shares at a purchase price of CDN $0.01 per
      share.





(2)
            16,000,000
      of the shares owned by Mr. Uppal are subject to our option to purchase all
      or any portion of these shares at a purchase price of CDN $0.01 per
      share.





(3)
            Based
      on 42,613,920 shares outstanding as of June 25,
  2010.





Stock
Options.





The terms
of options grantable by the Company are done at the discretion of the Option
Committee of the Board of Directors, including the number of common shares under
option, the exercise price and expiry date of such options and any amendments
thereto.  The Company adopted a formal written stock option plan (the
"Plan") on June 24, 2005.





Such
“terms and conditions”, including the pricing of the options, expiry and the
eligibility of personnel for such stock options; and are described
below.





The
principal purposes of the Company’s stock option program are to (a) promote a
proprietary interest in the Company among the officers, directors, employees and
consultants of the Company, (b) retain and attract the qualified officers,
directors, employees and consultants the Company requires, (c) provide a
long-term incentive element in overall compensation, and (d) promote the
long-term profitability of the Company.





The Plan
provides that stock options may be granted to service providers for the
Company.  The term “service providers” means (a) any full or part-time
employee or Officer, or insider of the Company; (b) any other person employed by
a company or individual providing management services to the Company; (c) any
other person or company engaged to provide ongoing consulting services for the
Company (any person in (a), (b), or (c) hereinafter referred to as an “Eligible
Person”); and (e) any corporation controlled by such Eligible Person, the issued
and outstanding voting shares of which are, and will continue to be,
beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by such Eligible Person and/or
spouse, children and/or grandchildren of such Eligible
Person.   Subject to the foregoing, the board of directors or
Committee, as applicable, shall have full and final authority to determine the
persons who are to be granted options under the Plan and the number of shares
subject to each option.





The Plan
shall be administered by the board of directors of the Company or a committee
established by the board of directors for that purpose.  Subject to
approval of the granting of options by the board of directors or Committee, as
applicable, the Company shall grant options under the Plan.





41


The Plan
provides that the aggregate number of shares of the Company, which may be issued
and sold under the Plan, will not exceed 5,000,000.  The Company shall
not, upon the exercise of any option, be required to issue or deliver any shares
prior to (a) the admission of such shares to listing on any stock exchange on
which the Company’s shares may them be listed, and (b) the completion of such
registration or other qualification of such shares under any law, rules or
regulation as the Company shall determine to be necessary or
advisable.  If any shares cannot be issued to any optionee for
whatever reason, the obligation of the Company to issue such shares shall
terminate and any option exercise price paid to the Company shall be returned to
the optionee.





If a
stock option expires or otherwise terminates for any reason without having been
exercised in full, the number of common shares reserved for issuance under that
expired or terminated stock option shall again be available for the purposes of
the Plan.  The Plan provides that it is solely within the discretion
of the Board to determine who should receive stock options and in what amounts,
subject to the following conditions:





(a)           options
will be non-assignable and non-transferable;


(b)           options
may be exercisable for a maximum of ten years from grant date;


(c)           options
to acquire no more than 5% of the issued shares of the Company under the Plan
together with any other options for services may be granted to any one
individual in any 12-month period;


(d)           options
to acquire no more than 10% of the issued shares of the Company may be granted
to anyinsiders in any 12-month
period;


(e)           the
issuance of shares to insiders of the Company may not exceed 10% of the issued
and outstanding shares within a one year period


(f)           the
issuance of shares to an insider of the Company and his or her associates under
the Plan and all other compensation arrangements, within a one year period, may
not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding shares.


(g)           unless
otherwise determined by the Option Committee, all vested options expire 30 days
following the date of resignation or termination of the option
holder;


(h)           in
the event of an option holder’s death, the option holder’s personal
representative may exercise any portion of the option holder’s vested
outstanding options for a period of one year following the option holder’s
death, with the consent of the board of directors.





The Plan
provides that other terms and conditions may be attached to a particular stock
option, such terms and conditions to be referred to in a schedule attached to
the option certificate.  Stock options granted to directors, senior
officers, employees or consultants will vest over a three-year period unless
otherwise determined by the Board on a case by case basis.





The price
at which an option holder may purchase a common share upon the exercise of a
stock option will be as set forth in the option certificate issued in respect of
such option and in any event will not be less than the market price of the
Company’s common shares as of the date of the grant of the stock option (the
“Award Date”).  The market price of the Company’s common shares for a
particular Award Date will typically be the closing trading price of the
Company’s common shares on the day immediately preceding the Award Date, or
otherwise in accordance with the terms of the Plan.  Where there is no
such closing price or trade on the prior trading day “market price” shall mean
the average of the most recent bid and ask of the shares of the Company on any
stock exchange on which the shares are listed or dealing network on which the
shares of the Company trade.





In no
case will a stock option be exercisable at a price less than the minimum
prescribed by each of the organized trading facilities or the applicable
regulatory authorities that would apply to the award of the stock option in
question.





Common
shares will not be issued pursuant to stock options granted under the Plan until
they have been fully paid for by the option holder.





The names
and titles of the Directors/Executive Officers of the Company to whom
outstanding stock options have been granted and the number of common shares
subject to such options are set forth in Table No. 5 as of December 31,
2009.


42


ITEM 7.  MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS





7.A.  Major
Shareholders.





7.A.1.a.  Holdings
By Major Shareholders.





The
Company has two Shareholders who own more than 5% of the issued
shares.  As at June 25, 2010, Paul Noland has beneficial ownership of
14,000,000 shares, or 32.9% of the common shares.  Paul Uppal has
beneficial ownership of 16,000,000 shares, or 37.5% of the common
shares.





7.A.1.b.  Significant
Changes in Major Shareholders’ Holdings.





On June
30, 2009, 16,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by Robert
Coale were gifted by Mr. Coale to Paul Uppal, pursuant to an assignment, dated
June 30, 2009, among, Mr. Coale, Mr. Uppal and the Company.  No
consideration was paid by Mr. Uppal for the gifting of such shares.





On
September 12, 2008, 14,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by
Scott Praill were gifted by Mr. Praill to Paul D. Noland, pursuant to an
assignment, dated September 12, 2008, among, Mr. Praill, Mr. Noland and the
Company.  No consideration was paid by Mr. Noland for the gifting of
such shares. Such assignment was made subsequent to Mr. Praill resigning as
Director and terminating his relationship with the Company.





On
September 12, 2008, 16,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by
Scott Praill were gifted by Mr. Praill to Robert Coale, pursuant to an
assignment, dated September 12, 2008, among, Mr. Praill, Mr. Coale and the
Company.  No consideration was paid by Mr. Coale for the gifting of
such shares. Such assignment was made subsequent to Mr. Praill resigning as
Director and terminating his relationship with the Company.





On
January 23, 2006, 15,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by
Ronald C. Blomkamp were gifted by Mr. Blomkamp to Scott Praill, pursuant to an
assignment, dated January 23, 2006, among Mr. Blomkamp, Mr. Praill, and the
Company.  No consideration was paid by Mr. Praill for the gifting of
such shares. Such assignment was made subsequent to Mr. Blomkamp resigning as
President and terminating his relationship with the Company.





7.A.1.c.  Different
Voting Rights.





The
Company’s major shareholders do not have different voting rights.





7.A.2.  Canadian
Share Ownership.





As of the
record date of June 25, 2010, the Company’s shareholders’ list showed 42,613,920
common shares outstanding and 58 shareholders.  The Company’s shares
are listed on a public exchange but have not yet traded.  Mr. Paul
Noland, a US resident owns a total of 14,000,000 common shares, equivalent to
32.9% of total and outstanding common shares of the Company.  Mr.,
Paul Uppal, a Canadian resident owns a total of 16,000,000 common shares,
equivalent to 37.5% of the total and outstanding of the Company.





Of the
42,613,920 common shares outstanding, there were 28,561,420 registered shares
held by individuals with Canadian addresses, equivalent to 67.0% of the total
and outstanding common shares of the Company.





7.A.4.  Change of
Control of Company Arrangements.





There are
no arrangements, known to the Company, the operation of which may at a
subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.





43


7.B.  Related
Party Transactions





In
September 2003, pursuant to an agreement, we issued 15,000,000 common shares to
Ronald Blomkamp, one of our founders.  Such shares are restricted and
the certificates representing such shares contain a restrictive
legend.  In September 2003, we also issued an additional 15,000,000
common shares to one of our directors and founder, Scott Praill.  On
January 23, 2006, 15,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by
Ronald C. Blomkamp were gifted by Mr. Blomkamp to Mr. Praill, pursuant to an
assignment, dated January 23, 2006, among Mr. Blomkamp, Mr. Praill and the
Company.  No consideration was paid by Mr. Praill for the gifting of
such shares. Such assignment was made subsequent to Mr. Blomkamp resigning as
President and terminating his relationship with the Company.





In
September, 2008, 14,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by
Scott Praill were gifted by Mr. Praill to Paul D. Noland, pursuant to an
assignment, dated September 12, 2008, among, Mr. Praill, Mr. Noland and the
Company.  No consideration was paid by Mr. Noland for the gifting of
such shares. Such assignment was made subsequent to Mr. Praill resigning as
Director and terminating his relationship with the Company.





In
September, 2008, 16,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by
Scott Praill were gifted by Mr. Praill to Robert Coale, pursuant to an
assignment, dated September 12, 2008, among, Mr. Praill, Mr. Coale and the
Company.  No consideration was paid by Mr. Coale for the gifting of
such shares. Such assignment was made subsequent to Mr. Praill resigning as
Director and terminating his relationship with the Company.





On June
30, 2009, 16,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by Robert
Coale were gifted by Mr. Coale to Paul Uppal, pursuant to an assignment, dated
June 30, 2009, among, Mr. Coale, Mr. Uppal and the Company.  No
consideration was paid by Mr. Uppal for the gifting of such shares.





The
common shares beneficially owned by Paul D. Noland and Paul Uppal are subject to
our right, exercisable at any time, to purchase any or all of these shares from
Paul D. Noland and  at a purchase price of CDN$0.01 per
share.  We have this right until we, in our sole discretion, decide to
terminate the agreement.





Shareholder
Loans





There are
no loans to shareholders.





Amounts Owing to Senior
Management/Directors





At
December 31, 2009 and 2008 no amounts were owed to senior management or
directors.  There have been no transactions since inception, or
proposed transactions, which have materially affected or will materially affect
the Company in which any director, executive officer, or beneficial holder of
more than 5% of the outstanding common shares, or any of their respective
relatives, spouses, associates or affiliates has had or will have any direct or
material indirect interest.  Management believes the transactions
referenced above were on terms at least as favorable to the Company as the
Company could have obtained from unaffiliated parties.





7.C.  Interests of
Experts and Counsel





--- Not
applicable ---





44


ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL
INFORMATION





8.A.  Statements
and Other Financial Information





The
Company's financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) and are
prepared in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP), the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all
material respects for the periods presented with United States GAAP, except as
discussed in footnotes to the financial statements.





The
financial statements as required under ITEM 18 are attached hereto and found
immediately following the text of this Annual Report.  The audit
reports of BDO Canada LLP are included herein immediately preceding the
financial statements.





Audited Financial
Statements:





Fiscal
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007





8.A.7.  Legal/Arbitration
Proceedings





The
Directors and the management of the Company do not know of any material, active
or pending, legal proceedings against them; nor is the Company involved as a
plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation.





The
Directors and the management of the Company know of no active or pending
proceedings against anyone that might materially adversely affect an interest of
the Company.





8.A.8.  Policy on
dividend distributions





The
Company has never declared or paid a dividend to its
shareholders.  The Company does not have any policy on dividend
distributions.





8.B.  Significant
Changes





On
January 27, 2006, pursuant to three separate Loan Conversion Agreements the
Company and each of the three individual lenders agreed to convert the three
bridge loans into units of the Company at a conversion rate of CDN$0.10 per
Unit.  Each Unit consists of one common share, one Class A warrant
giving the holder the right to purchase one common share at CDN$0.25, which is
exercisable from January 27, 2009 until January 27, 2011, and one Class B
warrant giving the holder the right to purchase one common share at CDN$0.50,
which is exercisable from January 27, 2009 until January 27, 2012.  As
result of such loan conversions, the Company has issued a total of 731,570
restricted shares of common stock, 731,570 Class A warrants, and 731,570 Class B
warrants representing a grand total of principal and accrued interest at January
27, 2006 of $73,157.





On March
24, 2006, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement giving the
Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a 100% interest in a mineral
exploration permit covering the South Vulture property located in Maricopa
County, Arizona.  The Company may exercise the option by making cash
payments totaling CDN $27,294 (USD $25,000) and incurring net expenditures on
the property of at least CDN $119,793 (USD $120,000) by March 24,
2010.  The Company paid the initial CDN $5,850 (USD $5,000) upon
executing the agreement as required under the initial Property Option Agreement
and made the annual payments of CDN $5,660 (USD $5,000) and CDN $5,870 (USD
$5,000) due March 24, 2008 and 2007 respectively. The Company met its obligation
with respect to minimum exploration expenditures for 2007, but did not for
2008.   After further review and consideration of all findings
and relevant information regarding the South Vulture Property, the Company chose
to terminate the Property Option Agreement by giving Mr. Fred Brost notice of
our election to terminate on February 24, 2009.  The Company does not
maintain any further rights, interests, or obligations in the
property.





45


On June
1, 2006 we entered into a property option agreement with Warner Gruenwald to
acquire a 100% interest in a property in the Province of British Columbia known
as the GQ Property.  We may exercise our option by making cash
payments totalling CDN $100,000 and incurring net expenditures of CDN $110,000
by June 1, 2010.  The Company made the $10,000 and $20,000 payment on
June 1, 2007 and 2008 respectively and also met its obligations with respect to
the minimum exploration expenditures for 2007 and 2008. In 2009 the Company
incurred $45,877 in exploration expenditures; however, was in default of the
$30,000 cash payment due June 1, 2009. After further review and
consideration of all findings and relevant information regarding the GQ
Property, the Company chose to terminate the Property Option Agreement by giving
Mr. Warner Gruenwald notice of our election to terminate on April 23,
2010.  The Company does not maintain any further rights, interests, or
obligations in the property.





On July
14, 2006 we entered into a property option agreement with James Sorrell to
acquire a 100% interest in a property in Santa Cruz County, Arizona known as the
Margarita Property.  We made an initial payment of CDN $39,300 (USD
$35,000) upon signing the agreement and we may exercise our option by making
further cash payments totalling CDN $822,908 (USD $825,000) by May 31, 2012 and
incurring net expenditures of CDN $675,405 (USD $675,000) by May 31,
2009.  Also on July 14, 2006 in relation to the Company entering into
the Margarita Property Option Agreement, the Company entered into a Finder’s Fee
Agreement with Fred Brost.  The Company has agreed to pay a fee equal
to 10% of the Property Option Payments made to James Sorrell during the first
three years of the Margarita Property Option Agreement.  It is
estimated that if the Company makes all of the scheduled property option
payments to Mr. Sorrell, the amount paid under the Finder’s Fee Agreement to Mr.
Brost will be CDN $30,730 (USD $31,000).  If the Company terminates
the Margarita Property Option Agreement, the Company will not owe any further
payments under the Finder’s Fee Agreement.  If it has not been
terminated earlier, the Finder’s Fee Agreement will terminate automatically on
July 14, 2009.  On May 31, 2007 the Company made the property option
payment of CDN $54,650 (USD $50,000) and the related finders’ fee payment of CDN
$5,465 (USD $5,000) and also met its obligations with respect to the minimum
exploration expenditures for 2007.





On
January 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Assignment and Assumption
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Patriot Gold Corp. (“Patriot”) to assign the
Company’s rights and obligations under the Margarita Property Option Agreement
to Patriot.  Pursuant to the Agreement, Patriot assumed the rights,
and agreed to perform all of the duties and obligations, of the Company arising
under the Margarita Property Option Agreement. Simultaneous with the execution
and delivery of the Agreement, Patriot paid the Company CDN $201,600 (USD
$200,000) which amount represents the full payment and satisfaction for the
assignment to Patriot by the Company.  Included in the assignment to
Patriot were, without limitation, all sums incurred by the Company in connection
with its exploration of the Margarita Property which includes the refunding of
the reclamation bond previously paid by the Company to the Forest Service in
Arizona, all expenditure credits incurred by the Company prior to the execution
of the Agreement and all property option payments made to the Margarita
Property. In addition, as the Company also assigned all of its rights and
obligations under the Finders’ Fee Agreement to Patriot, it is no longer
required to make further payments.  Subsequent to the execution of the
Agreement, the Company did not retain any interest in the Margarita
Property.





On
February 28, 2008 by way of new letter agreements with certain respective
Warrantholder the time of the warrant commencement date were extended from April
30, 2008 to April 30, 2009 with respect to the Class B Warrants; and from
October 30, 2008 to October 30, 2009 with respect to the Class C
Warrants.  In addition, the Warrant Expiration Date has been extended
from October 30, 2009 to October 30, 2010 with respect to the Class B Warrants;
and from October 30, 2010 to October 30, 2011 with respect to the Class C
Warrants.





On
September 30, 2008 by way of new letter agreements with certain respective
Warrantholder the time of the Warrant Commencement Date were extended from April
30, 2009 to April 30, 2010 with respect to the Class B Warrants; and from
October 30, 2009 to October 30, 2010 with respect to the Class C
Warrants.  In addition, the Warrant Expiration Date has been extended
from October 30, 2008 to October 30, 2010 with respect to the Class A Warrants;
and from October 30, 2010 to October 30, 2011 with respect to the Class B
Warrants; and from October 30, 2011 to October 30, 2012 with respect to the
Class C Warrants.


46


On July
15, 2009, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement with Peak
Geological Inc, giving the Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a
100% interest in a mineral exploration permit covering the Mammoth property
located in Prince George, BC.  The property, known as the Mammoth
Property, consists of 102 mineral tenure claims and covers approximately 47,000
hectares.  In addition, the Company is subject to a 2% net smelter
return royalty to the optioner upon production.  The Company may
exercise the option by making a cash payment of $60,000 upon signing the
Agreement, plus additional cash payments of $40,000, and incurring net
expenditures on the property of at least CDN$ 1,000,000 by April 1,
2013.  The Company paid the initial CDN $60,000 upon signing the
agreement and has incurred $70,000 in exploration expenses by December 31,
2009.  At June 25, 2010 the Company had a shortfall in property
expenditures of $130,000 and cash expenditures of $10,000 and is currently in
default.  The Company is at risk of losing its interest in the
property by not making the indicated option payments and incurring the
exploration expenditures, when demanded.





On August
20, 2009 at an Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of the Corporation, a
majority of the Company’s shareholders granted the Board of Directors the
authority to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation in connection with a
name change of the Company to one of the following: Goldrush Metals Corp., Rush
Exploration Corp., Rush Metals Corp., or such other name as may be approved by
the Board of Directors and Corporations Canada.





On August
31, 2009 the Board of Directors approved a name change of the Company to Rush
Metals Corp.





Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, on May 13, 2010 pursuant to new letter agreements with
certain  warrant holders, the warrant vesting dates was further
extended from April 30, 2010 to April 30, 2011 with respect to the Class B
Warrants and from October 30, 2010 to October 30, 2011 with respect to the Class
C Warrants.  In addition, the warrant expiration date has been
extended from October 30, 2010 to October 30, 2012 with respect to the Class A
Warrants, from October 30, 2011 to October 30, 2013 with respect to the Class B
Warrants and from October 30, 2012 to October 30, 2014 with respect to the Class
C Warrants.





Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, on May 13, 2010 pursuant to new letter agreements with
certain warrant holders, the warrant vesting date was extended from January 27,
2011 to January 27, 2013 with respect to the Class A Warrants and from January
27, 2012 to January 27, 2014 with respect to the Class B Warrants.





ITEM 9.  THE OFFER
AND LISTING





9.C.  Markets





Admission
to Quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board





In April
2008 we applied to the NASD to have our common stock be quoted on the OTC
Bulletin Board and as of October 2008 we have received approval for our shares
to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol AGRUF:OTC:BB.  In
October 2009 our trading symbol was changed to RSMTF:OTC:BB to reflect the name
change from American Goldrush Corp. to Rush Metals Corp.


The OTC
Bulletin Board differs from national and regional stock exchanges in that
it:





(1) is
not situated in a single location but operates through communication of bids,
offers andconfirmations between
broker-dealers, and





(2)
securities admitted to quotation are offered by one or more Broker-dealers
rather than the"specialist"
common to stock exchanges.





To
qualify for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, an equity security must have
one registered broker-dealer, known as the market maker, willing to list bid or
sale quotations and to sponsor the company listing.





47


ITEM
10.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION





10.A.  Share
Capital





--- Not
applicable ---





10.B.  Memorandum
and Articles of Association





The
Company’s Articles of Incorporation were filed with the Director under the
Canada Business Corporations Act on August 12, 2003. The Company, having a
primary place of business in the Province of British Columbia, was also issued a
Certificate of Registration as an extra-provincial company under the Company
Act, British Columbia on November 7, 2003.  Pursuant to Section 4 of
the Statement on Registration Extra-provincial Company filed on November 7,
2003, the Company’s objects and purposes was described as “mineral exploration
and development”.  In September 2008 the Company filed a Form 42
Notice of Ceasing to Carry on Business in British Columbia and filed with
Industry Canada to change its jurisdiction and primary place of business to
Alberta. On August 20, 2009 at an Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of
the Corporation, a majority of the Company’s shareholders granted the Board of
Directors the authority to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation in
connection with a name change of the Company to one of the following: Goldrush
Metals Corp., Rush Exploration Corp., Rush Metals Corp., or such other name as
may be approved by the Board of Directors and Corporations Canada.  On
August 31, 2009 the Board of Directors approved a name change of the Company to
Rush Metals Corp.





The
directors of the Company are empowered under Schedule C to the Articles of
Incorporation to (1) borrow money upon the credit of the Company; (2) issue,
reissue, sell or pledge the debt obligations of the Company; (3) give a
guarantee on behalf of the Company to secure performance of an obligation of any
person; and (4) charge, mortgage, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise create a
security interest in all or any of the currently owned or subsequently acquired
property and assets of the Company, including, without limitation, real and
personal property, movable and immovable property, tangible and intangible
assets, book debts, right, powers, franchises and undertakings, to secure any
obligation of the Company.  The Company’s Articles of Incorporation
and By-Laws do not place any restrictions on the voting powers of interested
directors.  With respect to the directors of the Company, section 3 of
the By-Laws of the Company provides that, as long as an interested director has
complied with the applicable provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act,
any director shall not be disqualified by his office from contracting with the
Company, nor shall any contract or arrangement entered into by or on behalf of
the Company with any director or in which any director is in any way interested
be liable to be voided, nor shall any director so contracting or interested be
liable to account to the Company for any profit realized from such contract or
arrangement by reason of that director or officer holding that office or of the
fiduciary relationship thereby established provided that such officer or
director shall have complied with the provisions of the Canada Business
Corporations Act





The
holders of the Company’s Common shares are entitled to receive notice of, and
attend and vote at all, meetings of shareholders.   Currently,
there are no specific rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each of
the Company’s Preferred shares.  The Company may issue Preferred
shares in one or more series and, pursuant to Schedule A to the Company’s
Articles of Incorporation, the directors may, by majority resolution, alter the
Articles of Incorporation to create, define and attach rights and restrictions
to the shares of each series.





Pursuant
to section 12 of the Company’s By-Laws, the quorum at meetings of the Company’s
shareholders shall be constituted by the presence of two shareholders entitled
to vote at any such meeting holding or representing by proxy not less than
one-twentieth of the shares entitled to be voted at such meeting.





There are
no limitations on the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or
exercise voting rights on the securities of the Company imposed by foreign law
or by the Articles of Incorporation or any other constituent document of the
Company.





48


10.C.  Material
Contracts





Since
inception (August 8, 2003), the Company has entered into the material contracts
listed below:





1.
            Share
      Purchase Option Agreement with Scott Praill, one of our Directors, which
      allows us at any time to send a notice to Mr. Praill that we are
      purchasing all or any portion of his 30,000,000 shares. The irrevocable
      option which he granted us is exercisable at any time at an exercise price
      of CDN $0.01 per share. If we elect to exercise our option to purchase his
      shares, we shall pay the applicable purchase price thereof no later than
      10 business days after the delivery of a
notice.





2.
            Property
      Agreement between the Company and Randy Polischuk dated February 18, 2004,
      as       amended on November 29,
      2004.  On November 23, 2005, the Company terminated the Option
      Agreement.





3.  On
      March 22, 2005 the Company entered into a Bridge Loan with Igman
      Consulting Group in the principal amount of $15,000. The loan bore
      interest at the Bank of Canada Prime Rate + 1% and was
      unsecured.





4.  On
      July 8, 2005 the Company entered into a Bridge Loan with Trevor Newton in
      the principal amount of      USD $5,000 (CDN
      $6,139).  The loan bore interest at the Bank of Canada Prime
      Rate + 1% and was unsecured.





5.  On
      August 29, 2005 the Company entered into a Bridge Loan with Fred Coombes
      in the principal amount of $50,000.  The loan bore interest at
      the Bank of Canada Prime Rate + 1% and was
  unsecured.





6.
            On
      January 27, 2006, the Company retired the following three loans, whose
      aggregate outstanding amounts totaled CDN $73,157, by converting them into
      731,570 units of the Company’s securities (the “Units”): loan made on
      August 29, 2005 by Fred Coombes, in the principal amount of CDN $50,000;
      loan made on March 22, 2005 by Igman Consulting Group, in the principal
      amount of CDN $15,000; and loan made on July 8, 2005 by Trevor Newton, in
      the principal amount of USD $5,000.  All three loans bore
      interest at the Bank of Canada Prime Rate + 1%.  Pursuant to a
      Conversion Agreement, dated January 27, 2006, entered into between the
      Company and each of the above lenders, each loan was converted at CDN$0.10
      per Unit.





7.
            On
      March 24, 2006, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement
      giving the Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a 100%
      interest in a mineral exploration permit covering the South Vulture
      property located in Maricopa County, Arizona.  The Company may
      exercise the option by making cash payments totalling CDN $27,294 (USD
      $25,000) and incurring net expenditures on the property of at least CDN
      $119,793 (USD $120,000) by March 24, 2010.  The Company paid the
      initial CDN $5,850 (USD $5,000) upon executing the agreement as required
      under the initial Property Option Agreement and made the annual payments
      of CDN $5,660 (USD $5,000) and CDN $5,870 (USD $5,000) due March 24, 2008
      and 2007 respectively. The Company also met its obligation with respect to
      minimum exploration expenditures for
2007.





8.
            On
      June 1, 2006 we entered into a property option agreement with Warner
      Gruenwald to acquire a 100% interest in a property in the Province of
      British Columbia known as the GQ Property.  We may exercise our
      option by making cash payments totaling CDN $100,000 and incurring net
      expenditures of CDN $110,000 by June 1, 2010.  The Company made
      the $10,000 payment on June 1, 2007 and also met its obligations with
      respect to the minimum exploration expenditures for
  2007.





49


9.
            On
      July 14, 2006 we entered into a property option agreement with James
      Sorrell to acquire a 100% interest in a property in Santa Cruz County,
      Arizona known as the Margarita Property.  We made an initial
      payment of CDN $39,300 (USD $35,000) upon signing the agreement and we may
      exercise our option by making further cash payments totaling CDN $822,908
      (USD $825,000) by May 31, 2012 and incurring net expenditures of CDN
      $675,405 (USD $675,000) by May 31, 2009.  Also on July 14, 2006
      in relation to the Company entering into the Margarita Property Option
      Agreement, the Company entered into a Finder’s Fee Agreement with Fred
      Brost under which it is estimated that if the Company makes all of the
      scheduled property option payments to Mr. Sorrell, the amount paid under
      the Finder’s Fee Agreement to Mr. Brost will be CDN $30,730 (USD
      $31,000).  On May 31, 2007 the Company made the property option
      payment of CDN $54,650 (USD $50,000) and the related finders’ fee payment
      of CDN $5,465 (USD $5,000) and also met its obligations with respect to
      the minimum exploration expenditures for
2007.





10.
      On January 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Assignment and Assumption
      Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Patriot Gold Corp. (“Patriot”) to assign
      the Company’s rights and obligations under the Margarita Property Option
      Agreement to Patriot.  Pursuant to the Agreement, Patriot
      assumed the rights, and agreed to perform all of the duties and
      obligations, of the Company arising under the Margarita Property Option
      Agreement. Simultaneous with the execution and delivery of the Agreement,
      Patriot paid the Company CDN $201,600 (USD $200,000) which amount
      represents the full payment and satisfaction for the assignment to Patriot
      by the Company.  Included in the assignment to Patriot were,
      without limitation, all sums incurred by the Company in connection with
      its exploration of the Margarita Property which includes the refunding of
      the reclamation bond previously paid by the Company to the Forest Service
      in Arizona, all expenditure credits incurred by the Company prior to the
      execution of the Agreement and all property option payments made to the
      Margarita Property. In addition, as the Company also assigned all of its
      rights and obligations under the Finders’ Fee Agreement to Patriot, it is
      no longer required to make further payments.  Subsequent to the
      execution of the Agreement, the Company did not retain any interest in the
      Margarita Property.





11.
      On February 24, 2009 the Company chose to terminate the Property Option
      Agreement for the South Vulture Property by giving Mr. Fred Brost notice
      of our election to terminate.  The Company does not maintain any
      further rights, interests, or obligations in the
  property.





12.
      On July 15, 2009, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement
      with Peak Geological Inc, giving the Company the exclusive right and
      option to acquire a 100% interest in a mineral exploration permit covering
      the Mammoth property located in Prince George, BC.  The
      property, known as the Mammoth Property, consists of 102 mineral tenure
      claims and covers approximately 47,000 hectares.  In addition,
      the Company is subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty to the optioner
      upon production.  The Company may exercise the option by making
      a cash payment of $60,000 upon signing the Agreement, plus additional cash
      payments of $40,000, and incurring net expenditures on the property of at
      least CDN$ 1,000,000 by April 1, 2013.  The Company paid the
      initial CDN $60,000 upon signing the agreement and has incurred $70,000 in
      exploration expenses by December 31, 2009.  At June 25, 2010 the
      Company had a shortfall in property expenditures of $130,000 and cash
      expenditures of $10,000 and is currently in default.  The
      Company is at risk of losing its interest in the property by not making
      the indicated option payments and incurring the exploration expenditures,
      when demanded.





13.
      On April 23, 2010 the Company chose to terminate the Property Option
      Agreement for the GQ Property by giving Mr. Warner Gruenwald notice of our
      election to terminate.  The Company does not maintain any
      further rights, interests, or obligations in the
  property.





10.D.  Exchange
Controls





There are
no government laws, decrees or regulations in Canada which restrict the export
or import of capital or, subject to the following sentence, which affect the
remittance of dividends or other payments to nonresident holders of our common
shares. However, any such remittance to a resident of the United States is
generally subject to non-resident tax pursuant to Article X of the 1980
Canada-United States Income Tax Convention. See “Material Income Tax
Considerations” above for additional discussion on tax matters.


50


There are
currently no limitations of general application imposed by Canadian federal or
provincial laws on the rights of non-residents of Canada to hold or vote our
common shares. There are also no such limitations imposed by the articles of
incorporation with respect to our common shares. There are, however, certain
requirements on the acquisition of control of our securities by non-residents of
Canada. The Investment Canada Act requires notification to and, in certain
cases, advance review and approval by, the Government of Canada, of the
acquisition by a “non-Canadian” of “control” of a “Canadian business”, all as
defined in the Investment Canada Act. Generally speaking, in order for an
acquisition to be subject to advance review and approval, the asset value of the
Canadian business being acquired must meet or exceed certain monetary
thresholds.





10.E.  Taxation





Canadian Federal Income Tax
Considerations





The
following is a brief summary of some of the principal Canadian federal income
tax consequences to a holder of common shares of the Company (a "U.S. Holder")
who deals at arm's length with the Company, holds the shares as capital property
and who, for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Act") and the
Canada – United States Income Tax Convention (the "Treaty"), is at all relevant
times resident in the United States, is not and is not deemed to be resident in
Canada and does not use or hold and is not deemed to use or hold the shares in
carrying on a business in Canada. Special rules, which are not discussed below,
may apply to a U.S. Holder that is an insurer that carries on business in Canada
and elsewhere.





Under the
Act and the Treaty, a U.S. Holder of common shares will generally be subject to
a 15% withholding tax on dividends paid or credited or deemed by the Act to have
been paid or credited on such shares. The withholding tax rate is 5% where the
U.S. Holder is a corporation that beneficially owns at least 10% of the voting
shares of the Company and the dividends may be exempt from such withholding in
the case of some U.S. Holders such as qualifying pension funds and
charities.





In
general, a U.S. Holder will not be subject to Canadian income tax on capital
gains arising on the disposition of shares of the Company unless (i) at any time
in the five-year period immediately preceding the disposition, 25% or more of
the shares of any class or series of the capital stock of the Company was owned
by (or was under option of or subject to an interest of) the U.S. holder,
persons with whom the U.S. holder did not deal at arm's length, or the U.S
holder, together with such persons and (ii) the value of the common shares of
the Company at the time of the disposition derives principally from real
property (as defined in the Treaty) situated in Canada. For this purpose, the
Treaty defines real property situated in Canada to include rights to explore for
or exploit mineral deposits and other natural resources situated in Canada,
rights to amounts computed by reference to the amount or value of production
from such resources, certain other rights in respect of natural resources
situated in Canada and shares of a corporation the value of whose shares is
derived principally from real property situated in Canada.





A U.S.
Holder who is subject to Canadian income tax in respect of a capital gain
realized on a disposition of a common share must include one-half of the capital
gain (taxable capital gain) in computing the Holder's taxable income earned in
Canada.  The Holder may, subject to certain limitations, deduct
one-half of any capital loss (allowable capital loss) arising on a disposition
of taxable Canadian property from taxable capital gains realized in the year of
disposition in respect of taxable Canadian property and, to the extent not so
deductible, from such taxable capital gains realized in any of the three
preceding years or any subsequent year.





United States
Taxation





For
federal income tax purposes, an individual who is a citizen or resident of the
United States or a domestic corporation ("U.S. Taxpayer") will recognize a gain
or loss on the sale of the Company's common shares equal to the difference
between the proceeds from such sale and the adjusted tax basis of the common
shares.  The gain or loss will be a capital gain or capital loss if
the Company's common shares are a capital asset in U.S. Taxpayer's
hands.





51


For
federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Taxpayer will be required to include in
gross income dividends received on the Company's common shares.  A
U.S. Taxpayer who pays Canadian tax on a dividend on common shares will be
entitled, subject to certain limitations, to a credit (or alternatively, a
deduction) against federal income tax liability.  A domestic
corporation that owns at least 10% of the voting shares should consult its tax
advisor as to applicability of the deemed paid foreign tax credit with respect
to dividends paid on the Company's common shares.





Under a
number of circumstances, United States Investor acquiring shares of the Company
may be required to file an information return with the Internal Revenue Service
Center where they are required to file their tax returns with a duplicate copy
to the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, PA 19255.  In
particular, any United States Investor who becomes the owner, directly or
indirectly, of 10% or more of the shares of the Company will be required to file
such a return.  Other filing requirements may apply and United States
Investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning these
requirements.





The US
Internal Revenue Code provides special anti-deferral rules regarding certain
distributions received by US persons with respect to, and sales and other
dispositions (including pledges) of stock of, a passive foreign investment
company.  A foreign corporation, such as the Company, will be treated
as a passive foreign investment company if 75% or more of its gross income is
passive income for a taxable year or if the average percentage of its assets (by
value) that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income is at
least 50% for a taxable year.  The Company believes that it may be a
passive foreign investment company for the taxable year ended December 31,
2009.  Individual investors should consult with there own tax advisors
regarding the tax implications in their own situation.





10.F.  Dividends
and Paying Agents





--- Not
applicable ---





10.G.  Statement
by Experts





--- Not
applicable ---





ITEM
11.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK





FOREIGN
CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE SENSITIVITY




The
Company's operating expenses and liabilities are primarily incurred in Canadian
dollars.




To the
extent the Company engages in transactions in US dollars, the results of the
Company’s operations are subject to currency transaction risk and currency
translation risk. The operating results and financial position of the Company
are reported in Canadian dollars in the Company’s financial statements. The
fluctuation of the US dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar will
consequently have an impact upon the operations of the Company and may also
affect the value of the Company’s assets and the amount of shareholders’
equity.




The
Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar and its expenses are
predominantly incurred in Canadian dollars. The Company incurs a relatively
small portion of its expenses in U.S. dollars.




The
Company has not entered into any agreements or purchased any instruments to
hedge possible currency risks at this time.





INTEREST RATE
SENSITIVITY





The
Company currently has no significant long-term or short-term debt requiring
interest payments. Thus, the Company has not entered into any agreement or
purchased any instrument to hedge against possible interest rate risks at this
time.





52


The
Company's interest earning investments are primarily short-term, or can be held
to maturity, and thus, any reductions in carrying values due to future interest
rate declines are believed to be immaterial. However, as the Company has a
significant cash or near-cash position, which is invested in such instruments,
reductions in interest rates will reduce the interest income from these
investments.





ITEM
12.  DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY
SECURITIES





12.A. Debt
Securities





The
Company has no debt outstanding.





12.B. Warrants and
Rights





We have
warrants outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 31,163,140 common
shares.  The following table lists the warrants outstanding at
December 31, 2009.  Each warrant is exchangeable for one common
share.  The warrants are non-transferable and provide for a cashless
exercise option.





Class
            Number
      Outstanding
            Number
      Vested
            Exercise
      Price
            Expiry
      Date
            New
      Expiry Date (1)A
            8,500,000
            8,500,000
            $0.10
            Oct
      30, 2010
            Oct
      30, 2012B
            9,500,000
            -
            $1.46
            Oct
      30, 2011
            Oct
      30, 2013C
            9,500,000
            -
            $1.52
            Oct
      30, 2012
            Oct
      30, 2014A
            731,570
            731,570
            $0.25
            Jan
      27, 2011
            Jan
      27, 2013B
            731,570
            731,570
            $0.50
            Jan
      27, 2012
            Jan
      27, 2014A
            1,100,000
            1,100,000
            $1.00
            Jun
      16, 2011
            Jun
      16, 2011B
            1,100,000
            1,100,000
            $1.50
            Jun
      16, 2012
            Jun
      16, 201231,163,140
            12,163,140





(1)  Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, on May 13, 2010 vesting dates and expiration dates for
some classes of warrants were extended. See 7(a).





We have
the right, in our sole and absolute discretion, to (i) accelerate the exercise
date of the warrants to a date which is prior to the date the warrants can be
exercised and /or (ii) reduce the exercise price. If we exercise our right to do
so, we shall provide notice thereof to the warrant holder.





12.C. Other
Securities





--- Not
applicable ---





12.D. American Depository
Shares





--- Not
applicable ---





53


PART
II





ITEM
13.  DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND
DELINQUENCIES





There
have been no defaults, dividend arrearages or delinquencies.





ITEM
14.  MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE
OF PROCEEDS





There
have been no modifications to securities of any class of the
Company.





ITEM 15.  CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES





Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures





As
required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”), the Company’s management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2009, being the date of the Company’s most recently completed
fiscal year end. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with
the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, Mr. Paul Noland.  Based upon that evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are not effective due to the material weakness noted in
the Internal Controls over Financial Reporting below.





Internal Controls over
Financial Reporting





The
Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision of the Company’s
Principal Executive Officer, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (“GAAP”). The Company’s controls include policies and procedures
that:





 ̈
            pertain
      to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
      fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
      Company;


 ̈
            provide
      reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
      preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP;
      and


 ̈
            provide
      reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
      unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that
      could have a material effect on the annual financial statements or interim
      financial statements.





Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.





Management
conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria
set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included
review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness
of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion
on this evaluation.  Based on this evaluation, management concluded
that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of
December 31, 2009 due to the following material weakness:


54




·
            Our
      company’s administration is composed of a small number of administrative
      individuals resulting in a situation where limitations on segregation of
      duties exist. In order to remedy this situation we would need to hire
      additional staff to provide greater segregation of duties. Currently, it
      is not feasible to hire additional staff to obtain optimal segregation of
      duties.  Management will reassess this matter in the following
      year to determine whether improvement in segregation of duty is
      feasible.






Limitations of Controls and
Procedures







The
Company’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or
internal controls over financial reporting, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, they cannot provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been prevented or detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns
can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by unauthorized override of the control. The design of any systems of
controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Accordingly,
because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.





Attestation Report of
Registered Public Accounting Firm





This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in
this annual report.





Changes in Internal Controls
over Financial Reporting





During
the most recently completed fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, there were no
changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.





ITEM
16.  RESERVED





ITEM 16A.  AUDIT
COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT





Until
September 2008, the Company’s Audit Committee consists of three directors, all
of whom are financially literate and knowledgeable about the Company’s
affairs.  Mr. Scott Praill is the audit committee’s financial expert
member as a qualified accountant with 10 years experience in the mining
industry.  As of September 2008 the Board of Directors is empowered to
appoint a new audit committee for the Corporation.   There are no
current audit committee members and our Board of Directors has determined that
it does not have a member of the audit committee that qualifies as an “audit
committee financial expert” as defined in Item 401(e) of Regulation
S-K.  We believe that the Board of Directors are collectively capable
of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal
controls and procedures for financial reporting. In addition, we believe that
retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee
financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in
our circumstances given the early stages of our development and the fact that we
have not generated revenues to date.





55


ITEM 16B.  CODE OF
ETHICS





The
Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Company's principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, persons performing similar functions and other officers of the
Company. This code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form
20-F.  A copy of the code of ethics can be obtained from the Company
by making a request in writing addressed to the Corporate Secretary and mailing
such request to 11215 Jasper Avenue, Suite 505, Edmonton, Alberta T5K
0L5.





The code
of ethics was adopted on March 6, 2006.





Item 16C. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES





The audit
committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and
oversight of auditors; the audit committee has in place procedures for receiving
complaints and concerns about accounting and auditing matters; and has the
authority and the funding to engage independent counsel and other outside
advisors.





The Audit
Committee may delegate to one or more designated members of the Audit Committee
the authority to grant pre-approvals required by this policy /
procedure.  The decisions of any Audit Committee member to whom
authority is delegated to pre-approve a service shall be presented to the full
Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.





Fees,
including reimbursements for expenses, for professional services rendered by BDO
Canada LLP in 2009 and 2008 were:








Fiscal
      Year ended December 31
            
            Fiscal
      year
            
            
            Fiscal
      yearPrincipal
      Accountant Fees and Services
            
            2009
            
            
            2008Audit
      Fees
            
            $
            22,647
            
            
            $
            24,118Audit
      related fees
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $NilTax
      Fees
            
            $
            1,650
            
            
            $
            1,650All
      other fees
            
            $Nil
            
            
            $NilTotal
            
            $
            24,297
            
            
            $
            25,768








ITEM
16D.  EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT
COMMITTEES





--- Not
applicable ---





ITEM
16E.  PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS





There
have been no purchases of the Company's common shares by the Company or
affiliated purchasers during the period covered by this report.





56


PART
III





ITEM
17.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





See Item
18 for
a list of our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual
report





ITEM
18.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS







The
following statements are filed as part of this annual report, together with the
report of the independent registered public accounting firm:




Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Balance
Sheets


Statements
of Loss and Comprehensive Loss


Statements
of Cash Flows


Statements
of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity


Notes to
the Financial Statements








57






























































Rush
Metals Corp.


(formerly
American Goldrush Corp.)


(An
Exploration Stage Company)


Financial
Statements


December
31, 2009 and 2008


(Stated
in Canadian Dollars)

















58





Rush
Metals Corp.
 (formerly
American Goldrush Corp.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Financial
Statements
 December
31, 2009 and 2008
 Contents
 
 Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 Comments
by Auditors for US Readers on
 Canada
– US Reporting Differences
  Financial
Statements
  Balance
Sheets
  Statements
of Loss and Comprehensive Loss
  Statements
of Cash Flows
  Statements
of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
  Notes to
the Financial Statements
  
  59
  
 
 BDO CanadaLLP                                                       600
Cathedral Place
 925 West Georgia Street
 Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C
3L2
 Telephone:  (604)
688-5421
 Telefax:  (604)
688-5132
 E-mail:  vancouver@bdo.ca
 www.bdo.ca
  
 Report
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
 
  To
the Shareholders of
 Rush
Metals Corp. (formerly American Goldrush Corp.)
   We have
audited the Balance Sheets of Rush Metals Corp. (formerly American Goldrush
Corp.) (an Exploration Stage Company) as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the
Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss, Cash Flows and Changes in
Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and
the cumulative period from August 8, 2003 (inception) to December 31,
2009.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
  We
conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing
standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform an
audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
  In our
opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 and the cumulative period from August 8, 2003 (inception) to
December 31, 2009 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles.
  /s/ BDO
Canada LLP
  Chartered
Accountants
  Vancouver,
Canada
 June 23,
2010
  60
  
 BDO CanadaLLP                                                       600
Cathedral Place
 925 West Georgia Street
 Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C
3L2
 Telephone:  (604)
688-5421
 Telefax:  (604)
688-5132
 E-mail:  vancouver@bdo.ca
 www.bdo.ca
 
 
 
 Comments
      by Auditors for U.S. Readers
                On
      Canada-U.S. Reporting Differences
 
 
 
 
 In the
United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an
explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial
statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in
Note 1 to the financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated June
23, 2010 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do
not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors’ report
when these are adequately disclosed in the financial statements.
  /s/ BDO
Canada LLP
  Chartered
Accountants
  Vancouver,
Canada
 June 23,
2010
 
  
  61
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 
 BALANCE
SHEETS
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  
 
 
 December
      31
              
              2009
              
              
              2008ASSETSCurrentCash
      and cash equivalents
              
              $
              41,659
              
              
              $
              168,272Receivables
              
              
              6,998
              
              
              
              5,184Prepaid
      expenses
              
              
              1,000
              
              
              
              1,00049,657
              
              
              
              174,456Reclamation deposit(Note 4)
              
              
              3,367
              
              
              
              3,367$
              53,024
              
              
              $
              177,823LIABILITIESCurrentAccounts
      payable and accrued liabilities
              
              $
              23,636
              
              
              $
              22,286Stockholders’
      equityShare
      CapitalAuthorized:Unlimited
      common shares without par valueUnlimited
      preferred shares without par valueIssued:42,613,920
      (2008 – 41,613,920) common shares (Note 7)
              
              
              784,442
              
              
              
              684,442Contributed
      surplus
              
              
              2,034,749
              
              
              
              1,992,582Deficit
      accumulated during the exploration stage
              
              
              (2,789,803
              )
              
              
              (2,521,487
              )29,388
              
              
              
              155,537$
              53,024
              
              
              $
              177,823
 
 
 The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
 
 
  62
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 
 STATEMENTS
OF LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  
 AUGUST
      8, 2003YEARS
      ENDED DECEMBER 31,
              
              
              (INCEPTION)TODecember
      31,2009
              
              
              2008
              
              
              2007
              
              
              2009
                (cumulative)ExpensesMineral
      property acquisition andexploration
      expenditures (recovery) (Note 3)
              
              $
              176,895
              
              
              $
              (130,685
              )
              
              $
              251,693
              
              
              $
              473,324Office
      and sundry
              
              
              6,193
              
              
              
              12,802
              
              
              
              21,042
              
              
              
              85,029Rent
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              2,449
              
              
              
              2,640
              
              
              
              13,480Professional
      fees
              
              
              28,112
              
              
              
              38,825
              
              
              
              28,405
              
              
              
              274,772Transfer
      agent fees
              
              
              389
              
              
              
              448
              
              
              
              584
              
              
              
              4,675Directors’
      fees
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              6,128
              
              
              
              6,472
              
              
              
              20,087Loss
      on bridge loan conversion (Note 5)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              51,210Share-based
      compensation (Note 6)
              
              
              42.167
              
              
              
              112,130
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              1,654,297Stock-based
      compensation (Note 7)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              12,882
              
              
              
              41,107
              
              
              
              233,542Total
      expenses
              
              
              (253,756
              )
              
              
              (54,979
              )
              
              
              (351,943
              )
              
              
              (2,810,416
              )Interest
      income
              
              
              85
              
              
              
              2,035
              
              
              
              7,077
              
              
              
              12,731Interest
      expense
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (2,018
              )Foreign
      exchange gain (loss)
              
              
              (14,645
              )
              
              
              29,529
              
              
              
              (1,389
              )
              
              
              9,900Net
      loss and comprehensive loss for the period
              
              $
              (268,316
              )
              
              $
              (23,415
              )
              
              $
              (346,255
              )
              
              $
              (2,789,803
              )Loss
      per share – basic and diluted
              
              $
              (0.01
              )
              
              $
              (0.00
              )
              
              $
              (0.01
              )Weighted
      average shares outstanding
              
              
              41,823,509
              
              
              
              41,613,920
              
              
              
              41,613,920
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
 
  63
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 
 STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  
 
 AUGUST
      8, 2003YEARS
      ENDED DECEMBER 31,
              
              
              (INCEPTION)TODECEMBER
      31,2009
              
              
              2008
              
              
              2007
              
              
              2009
      (cumulative)Cash
      flows from operating activitiesNet
      loss for the period
              
              $
              (268,316
              )
              
              $
              (23,415
              )
              
              $
              (346,255
              )
              
              $
              (2,789,803
              )Adjustments
      to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
    activitiesLoss
      on bridge loan conversion (Note 5)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              51,210Share-based
      compensation (Note 6)
              
              
              42,167
              
              
              
              112,130
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              1,654,297Stock-based
      compensation (Note 7)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              12,882
              
              
              
              41,107
              
              
              
              233,542Change
      in receivables
              
              
              (1,814
              )
              
              
              2,530
              
              
              
              (723
              )
              
              
              (6,998
              )Change
      in prepaid expenses
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (300
              )
              
              
              (465
              )
              
              
              (1,000
              )Change
      in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
              
              
              1,350
              
              
              
              (8,108
              )
              
              
              (28,767
              )
              
              
              23,636Change
      in accrued interest payable
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              2,018Net
      cash provided by (used in) operating activities
              
              
              (226,613
              )
              
              
              95,719
              
              
              
              (335,103
              )
              
              
              (833,098
              )Cash
      flow from investing activityReclamation
      deposit
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              17,894
              
              
              
              (17,894
              )
              
              
              (3,367
              )Cash
      flows from financing activitiesIssuances
      of common stock
              
              
              100,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              806,985Proceeds
      from bridge loans (Note 5)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              71,139Net
      cash provided by financing activities
              
              
              100,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              878,124Increase
      (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
              
              
              (126,613
              )
              
              
              113,613
              
              
              
              (352,997
              )
              
              
              41,659Cash
      and cash equivalents, beginning of period
              
              
              168,272
              
              
              
              54,659
              
              
              
              407,656
              
              
              
              -Cash
      and cash equivalents, end of period
              
              $
              41,659
              
              
              $
              168,272
              
              
              $
              54,659
              
              
              $
              41,659
 
 Supplemental
      informationInterest
      paid
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -Income
      taxes paid
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -Non-cash
      investing and financing activitiesConversion
      of bridge loan principal and interest to equity (Note 5)
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              73,157
 
 
 
 The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
  64
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 
 STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  DEFICITCOMMON
      STOCK
              
              
              ACCUMULATEDNUMBER
      OF
              
              
              
              
              
              DURING
      THECOMMON
              
              
              
              
              
              EXPLORATION
              
              
              CONTRIBUTEDSHARES
              
              
              AMOUNT
              
              
              STAGE
              
              
              SURPLUS
              
              
              TOTALShares
      issued to founders on inception
              
              
              30,000,000
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -Private
      placement, common share issuances for cash at $0.01 per
      share      in October, 2003 (Note
      7)
              
              
              9,500,000
              
              
              
              95,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              95,000Net
      loss for the period
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (14,261
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (14,261
              )Balance,
      December 31, 2003
              
              
              39,500,000
              
              
              
              95,000
              
              
              
              (14,261
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              80,739Private
      placement, common share   issuances for cash at $0.10 per
        share in January, 2004 (Note 7)
              
              
              57,350
              
              
              
              5,735
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              5,735Net
      loss for the year
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (88,541
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (88,541
              )Balance,
      December 31, 2004
              
              
              39,557,350
              
              
              
              100,735
              
              
              
              (102,802
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (2,067
              )Stock-based
      compensation (Note 7)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              35,075
              
              
              
              35,075Net
      loss for the year
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (102,926
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (102,926
              )Balance,
      December 31, 2005
              
              
              39,557,350
              
              
              
              100,735
              
              
              
              (205,728
              )
              
              
              35,075
              
              
              
              (69,918
              )Conversion
      of bridge loans to equity   in January 2007 (Note
    5)
              
              
              731,570
              
              
              
              73,157
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              51,210
              
              
              
              124,367Private
      placement, common share   issuances for cash at $0.50 per
        share in June, 2006 (Note 7)
              
              
              1,100,000
              
              
              
              454,300
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              95,700
              
              
              
              550,000Issuance
      of shares upon the exercise   of stock options in February and
        June, 2006
              
              
              225,000
              
              
              
              56,250
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              56,250Stock-based
      compensation (Note 7)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              144,478
              
              
              
              144,478Share-based
      compensation (Note 6)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              1,500,000
              
              
              
              1,500,000Net
      loss for the year
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (1,946,089
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (1,946,089
              )Balance,
      December 31, 2006
              
              
              41,613,920
              
              
              
              684,442
              
              
              
              (2,151,817
              )
              
              
              1,826,463
              
              
              
              359,088Stock-based
      compensation (Note 7)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              41,107
              
              
              
              41,107Net
      loss for the year
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (346,255
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (346,255
              )Balance,
      December 31, 2007
              
              
              41,613,920
              
              
              
              684,442
              
              
              
              (2,498,072
              )
              
              
              1,867,570
              
              
              
              53,940Share-based
      compensation (Note 6)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              112,130
              
              
              
              112,130Stock-based
      compensation (Note 7)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              12,882
              
              
              
              12,882Net
      loss for the year
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (23,415
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (23,415
              )Balance,
      December 31, 2008
              
              
              41,613,920
              
              
              
              684,442
              
              
              
              (2,521,487
              )
              
              
              1,992,582
              
              
              
              155,537Share-based
      compensation (Note 6)
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              42,167
              
              
              
              42,167Issuance
      of shares upon the exercise of warrants in October, 2009
              
              
              1,000,000
              
              
              
              100,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              100,000Net
      loss for the year
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (268,316
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (268,316
              )Balance,
      December 31, 2009
              
              
              42,613,920
              
              
              $
              784,442
              
              
              $
              (2,789,803
              )
              
              $
              2,034,749
              
              
              $
              29,388
 
 The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
  65
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  1.      OPERATIONS
 
 Organization
 
 The
Company was incorporated in Canada under the laws of the Canadian Business
Corporations Act on August 8, 2003.
 
 Exploration Stage Activities
(Note 3)
 
 The
Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation and has not yet
commenced its planned operations (mineral exploration).  The Company
is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties in
North America.  In February, 2004, the Company entered into a Property
Option Agreement to acquire an option on a mineral exploration property in
British Columbia.  The Property Option Agreement was amended in
November, 2004, and on November 23, 2005 the Company terminated the Property
Option Agreement.  During 2006, the Company entered into three
separate Property Option Agreements to acquire an option on two properties in
Arizona (Margarita and South Vulture) and one in British Columbia, Canada
(GQ).  Subsequent to December 31, 2007, the Margarita property was
assigned to a third party and subsequent to December 31, 2008, the South Vulture
property option lapsed. During 2009, the Company entered into a Property Option
Agreement to acquire an option to purchase a property in British Columbia,
Canada (Mammoth). Subsequent to December 31, 2009, the GQ property option
lapsed.
 
 Ability to Continue as a
Going Concern
 
 The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will
continue as a going concern.  This contemplates that assets will be
realized and liabilities and commitments satisfied in the normal course of
business.
 
 As shown
in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred cumulative
losses of $2,789,803 for the period from August 8, 2003 (inception) to December
31, 2009 and has no source of revenue.  The future of the Company is
dependent upon its ability to obtain financing and upon future acquisition,
exploration and development of profitable operations from mineral
properties.  Management has plans to seek additional capital through a
private placement and public offering of its common stock.  These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern.  Although there are no assurances that management’s
plans will be realized, management believes that the Company will be able to
continue operations in the future.  The financial statements do not
include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might
be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.
 
 2.      SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
 The
financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in Canada. All figures are reported in
Canadian dollars. The significant accounting policies are summarized as
follows:
 
 a) Cash and Cash
Equivalents
 
 The
Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of 90
days or less to be cash equivalents. During the year ended December 31, 2009,
the Company did not have any cash equivalent balances (2008 -
$158,340).
 
  66
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  2.      SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
 
 b)      Mineral Property Payments
and Exploration Costs
 
 Exploration
costs are expensed as incurred. Development costs are charged to the statement
of loss until it has been established that a mineral deposit is commercially
mineable and a production decision has been made by the Company to formulate a
mining plan and develop a mine, at which point the costs subsequently incurred
to develop the mine on the property prior to the start of mining operations are
capitalized.
 
 Mineral
property acquisition costs are charged to the statement of loss until the
viability of the mineral interest is determined. Reductions in the carrying
value of a property would be recorded to the extent that the total carrying
value of the mineral property exceeds its estimated fair value.
 
 Where the
Company has entered into option agreements for the acquisition of an interest in
mineral properties which provides for periodic payments, amounts unpaid are not
recorded as a liability since they are paid entirely at the Company’s
option.
 
 To
December 31, 2009, all exploration and option payments have been charged to the
statement of loss due to the uncertainty of recoverability.
 
 c)      Use of
Estimates
 
 The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting
period.  Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
 
 d)      Foreign Currency
Transactions
 
 The
Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar.  Transactions in
foreign currency are translated into Canadian dollars as follows:
 
 ·  Monetary
items at the rate prevailing at the balance sheet date;
 ·  Non-monetary
items at the historical exchange rate;
 ·  Revenue
and expenses at the transaction date exchange rate.
 
 Gains and
losses on foreign exchange are included in the Statement of Loss.
 
 e)      Stock-based
compensation
 
 The
Company grants stock options pursuant to a stock option plan described in Note
7.  Compensation expense is recorded for stock options granted using
the fair value method with a corresponding increase in contributed
surplus.  The Company estimates the fair value at the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  Any consideration
received on exercise of stock options or the purchase of stock, plus the fair
value of options or stock, is credited to share capital.
  Under the
fair value  method, stock-based payments to non-employees are measured
at the fair value of the equity instrument issued.  The fair value of
stock-based payments to non-employees is periodically re-measured until the
earlier of:  completion of the services provided; a firm commitment to
complete the services; or the vesting date and any change therein is recognized
over the service period.
  67
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  2.      SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
 
 f)      Loss Per
Share
 The basic
loss per share is calculated by dividing income available to common stockholders
by the weighted average aggregate number of common shares outstanding during
each period. The Company follows the “Treasury Stock Method” in calculating the
diluted loss per common share.  Under this method, any proceeds from
the exercise of options and warrants are assumed to be used to purchase common
shares at the average market price during the period.  Common
equivalent shares (consisting of shares issuable on the exercise of common stock
options and warrants) totaling 31,238,140, 32,663,140, and 32,813,140 in 2009,
2008 and 2007 respectively were not included in the computation of loss per
share because the effect was anti-dilutive.
 
 g)      Income
Taxes
  Future
income taxes relate to the expected future tax consequences of differences
between the carrying amount of balance sheet items and their corresponding tax
values.  Future tax assets are recognized only to the extent that, in
the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that the net future income
tax assets will be realized.  Future income tax assets and liabilities
are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of
enactment or substantive enactment.
 
 h)      Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
 
 This
standard requires the presentation of a statement of comprehensive income and
its components.  Comprehensive income (loss) includes both net
earnings (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss).  Other
comprehensive income (loss) includes holding gains and losses on available for
sale investments, gains and losses on certain derivative financial instruments
and foreign currency gains and losses relating to self-sustaining foreign
operations, all of which are not included in the calculation of net earnings
(loss) until realized.
 
 i)      Financial Instruments –
Recognition and Measurement
 
 The
Company has classified its financial instruments as follows:
 
 ·
              Cash
      and cash equivalents as held for trading which is measured at fair value
      initially and in subsequent
periods;
 
 ·
              Receivables
      are classified as loans and receivables.  They are initially
      measured at fair value. Subsequent valuations are recorded at amortized
      cost using the effective interest rate
method.
 
 ·
              Accounts
      payable and accrued liabilities are classified as other
      liabilities.  They are initially measured at fair
      value.  Subsequent valuations are recorded at amortized cost
      using the effective interest rate
method.
 
 In order
to measure changes in fair value, the fair value hierarchy under GAAP
distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and
an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of
three levels and adjustments to fair value must be based on one of the following
measures:
 
 ·
              Level
      one – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
      liabilities;
 ·
              Level
      two – Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or
      indirectly observable, and;
 ·
              Level
      three – Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions,
      which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions
      that a market participant would
use.
 
 
 
  68
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  2.      SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
 
 i)      Financial Instruments –
Recognition and Measurement - continued
 
 The book
values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and accounts payable and
accrued liabilities approximate their respective fair value due to the
short-term nature of these instruments. As a result, no changes in fair value of
financial instruments have been recorded in the Statement of Loss.
 
 j)      Financial Instruments –
Disclosure and Presentation
 
 The
Company adopted the CICA guidelines of Section 3862, Financial Instruments –
Disclosures, and Section 3863, Financial Instruments –
Presentation.  These standards replace CICA 3861, Financial
Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation.
 
 These
standards increase the disclosures currently required, which will enable users
to evaluate the significance of financial instruments for an entity’s financial
position and performance, including disclosures about fair value.  In
addition, disclosure is required of qualitative and quantitative information
about exposure to risks arising from financial instruments, including specified
minimum disclosures about credit risk, liquidity risk, and market
risk.  The quantitative disclosures must provide information about the
extent to which the company is exposed to such risk, based on information
provided internally to the entity’s key management personnel.
 
 Financial
instruments issued by the Company are treated as equity only to the extent that
they do not meet the definition of a financial liability.  The
Company’s common shares are classified as equity instruments.
 
 Financial
Instrument Risk Exposure and Risk Management
 
 The
Company is exposed in varying degrees to a variety of financial instrument
related risks.  The Board of Directors approves and monitors the risk
management process.  The overall objective of the Board is to set
policies that seek to reduce risk as far as possible without unduly affecting
the Company’s competitiveness and flexibility. The types of risk exposure and
the way in which such exposure is managed is provided as follows:
 
 Credit
Risk
 
 The
Company is primarily exposed to credit risk on its bank
accounts.  Credit risk exposure is limited through maintaining its
cash with high-credit quality financial institutions.
 
 Liquidity
Risk
 
 Liquidity
risk is the risk that the Company is not able to meet its financial obligations
as they fall due.  The Company manages liquidity by maintaining its
cash and cash equivalent balances available to meet its anticipated operational
needs.  At December 31, 2009, the Company had a cash and cash
equivalent balance of $41,659 (2008 – $168,272) and current liabilities of
$23,636 (2008 – $22,286).  The Company believes that these sources
will be sufficient to cover the expected short- term cash requirements. However,
we anticipate that we will require up to approximately $179,600 to fund our
continued operations for the next twelve months.  We expect to
continue to finance operations through the sale of equity.
  69
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  2.      SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
 
 j)      Financial Instruments –
Disclosure and Presentation - continued
 
 Interest
Rate Risk
 
 Interest
rate risk is the risk that future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of
changes in market interest rates.  As of the year end, the Company was
not exposed to interest rate risk since all cash equivalents bearing interest
were liquidated during the year.
 
 Foreign
Currency Risk
 
 Financial
assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the Canadian dollar
are as follows:
 
 
 Financial
              
              
              FinancialAssets
              
              
              Liabilities2009
              
              
              2008
              
              
              2009
              
              
              2008U.S.
      dollar
              
              $
              5,530
              
              
              $
              136,605
              
              
              $
              3,784
              
              
              $
              781
 
 
 k)      Hedging
 
 The
Company currently does not hold any financial instruments designated for hedge
accounting.
 
 l)      Capital
Disclosure
 The
Company was formed for the purpose of acquiring exploration and development
stage natural resource properties.  The management determines the
Company’s capital structure and makes adjustments to it based on funds available
to the Company, in order to support the acquisition, exploration and development
of mineral properties.  The management has not established
quantitative return on capital criteria for capital
management.
 
 The
Company has acquired interests in various properties (Note 3) and has not yet
generated any revenue.  Accordingly the Company will be dependent in
the future upon external financing to fund future acquisition and exploration
programs and its administrative costs.  The Company will spend
existing working capital and raise additional amounts as needed.  The
Company will continue to assess new properties and to seek to acquire an
interest in additional properties if management feels there is sufficient
geologic or economic potential and provided it has adequate financial resources
to do so.
 
 The
management reviews its capital management approach on an ongoing basis and
believes that its approach, given the relative size of the Company is
reasonable. The Company’s objective when managing capital is to safeguard the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can continue to
provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other
stakeholders.
 
 The
Company considers the items included in shareholders’ equity as
capital.  The Company manages the capital structure and makes
adjustments to it in the light of changes in economic conditions and the risk
characteristics of the underlying assets.  In order to maintain or
adjust the capital structure, the Company may issue new shares through private
placements, sell assets to reduce debt or return capital to
shareholders.  The Company is not subject to externally imposed
capital requirements.
  70
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  2.      SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued
 
 m)      Recently Released Canadian
Accounting Standards
 
 International
Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
 
 The
Canadian Accounting Standards Board (“AcSB”) has confirmed that Canadian
publicly accountable entities will be required to prepare their financial
statements in accordance with IFRS for fiscal years beginning on or after
January 1, 2011. As a result, IFRS will be adopted by the Company on January 1,
2011 and its first set of IFRS compliant financial statements will be for the
year ended December 31, 2011, with comparative information presented on an IFRS
basis. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of IFRS will
have on its financial statements.
 
 Business
Combinations, Consolidated Financial Statements and Non-Controlling
Interests
 
 In
January 2009, the CICA issued Handbook Section 1582, Business
Combinations, Section 1601, Consolidated Financial
Statements, and Section 1602, Non-controlling Interestswhich requires business acquisitions (including non-controlling interests
and contingent consideration) to be measured at fair value on the acquisition
date, acquisition-related costs to be expensed, gains from bargain purchases to
be recorded in net earnings, and expands the definition of a business. Section
1601 establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial
statements and Section 1602 requires that non-controlling interest be presented
as part of equity and that transactions between the Company and the
non-controlling interests be reported as equity transactions. As Section 1582
will apply only to future business combinations, it will not have an effect on
the Company's financial statements since there have been no such acquisitions to
date. The Company is assessing the effect of adoption of Section 1601 and
Section 1602.
 
  71
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  3.      MINERAL
PROPERTY INTERESTS
 
 The
following table lists mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures
incurred on the Company’s properties to December 31, 2009.
 
 Margarita
              
              
              South
      Vulture
              
              
              GQ
              
              
              Mammoth
              
              
              Other
              
              
              TotalBalance
      at December 31, 2005
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              11,947
              
              
              
              11,9472006 ExpendituresProperty
      acquisition and option payments
              
              
              70,966
              
              
              
              8,735
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              79,701Geological
      and geophysical
              
              
              23,332
              
              
              
              16,173
              
              
              
              10,341
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              49,846Assaying
      and analysis
              
              
              1,135
              
              
              
              483
              
              
              
              2,282
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              3,900Camp
      and field supplies
              
              
              171
              
              
              
              205
              
              
              
              452
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              828Travel
      and accommodation
              
              
              6,407
              
              
              
              265
              
              
              
              205
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              6,877Consulting
              
              
              20,927
              
              
              
              1,395
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              22,322Total
      2006 expenditures
              
              
              122,938
              
              
              
              27,256
              
              
              
              13,280
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              163,474Balance
      at December 31, 2006
              
              
              122,938
              
              
              
              27,256
              
              
              
              13,280
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              11,947
              
              
              
              175,421
 
 2007 ExpendituresProperty
      acquisition and option payments
              
              
              89,255
              
              
              
              5,870
              
              
              
              10,615
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              105,740Geological
      and geophysical
              
              
              53,833
              
              
              
              7,475
              
              
              
              23,359
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              84,667Assaying
      and analysis
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              9,868
              
              
              
              6,756
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              16,624Camp
      and field supplies
              
              
              627
              
              
              
              1,987
              
              
              
              1,890
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              4,504Travel
      and accommodation
              
              
              2,885
              
              
              
              2,997
              
              
              
              2,444
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              8,326Consulting
              
              
              26,177
              
              
              
              5,655
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              31,832Total
      2007 expenditures
              
              
              172,777
              
              
              
              33,852
              
              
              
              45,064
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              251,693Balance
      at December 31, 2007
              
              
              295,715
              
              
              
              61,108
              
              
              
              58,344
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              11,947
              
              
              
              427,114
 
 2008 ExpendituresProperty
      acquisition and option payments
              
              
              (183,640
              )
              
              
              5,735
              
              
              
              20,591
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (157,314
              )Geological
      and geophysical
              
              
              4,444
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              10,798
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              15,243Assaying
      and analysis
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (2,844
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (2,844
              )Camp
      and field supplies
              
              
              320
              
              
              
              284
              
              
              
              165
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              768Travel
      and accommodation
              
              
              137
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              662
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              799Consulting
              
              
              2,511
              
              
              
              10,152
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              12,663Total
      2008 expenditures
              
              
              (176,228
              )
              
              
              16,171
              
              
              
              29,372
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (130,685
              )Balance
      at December 31, 2008
              
              $
              119,487
              
              
              $
              77,279
              
              
              $
              87,716
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              11,947
              
              
              $
              296,429
 
 
  72
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  3.      MINERAL
PROPERTY INTERESTS - Continued
 Margarita
              
              
              South
      Vulture
              
              
              GQ
              
              
              Mammoth
              
              
              Other
              
              
              TotalBalance
      at December 31, 2008
              
              $
              119,487
              
              
              $
              77,279
              
              
              $
              87,716
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              11,947
              
              
              $
              296,4292009 ExpendituresProperty
      acquisition and option payments
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              60,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              60,000Geological
      and geophysical
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              13,806
              
              
              
              34,742
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              48,548Assaying
      and analysis
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              1,984
              
              
              
              4,148
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              6,132Camp
      and field supplies
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              3,170
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              3,170Travel
      and accommodation
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              1,375
              
              
              
              795
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              2,170Consulting
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -Drilling
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              26,560
              
              
              
              30,315
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              56,875Total
      2009 expenditures
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              46,895
              
              
              
              130,000
              
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              176,895Balance
      at December 31, 2009
              
              $
              119,487
              
              
              $
              77,279
              
              
              $
              134,611
              
              
              $
              130,000
              
              
              $
              11,947
              
              
              $
              473,324
 
 
 South Vulture
Property
 
 On March
24, 2006, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement giving the
Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a 100% interest in a mineral
exploration permit covering the South Vulture property located in Maricopa
County, Arizona.  The Company could exercise the option by making cash
payments and incurring net expenditures on the property as follows:
 
 Date
              
              Cash
      Payments
              
              
              ExpendituresUSD
              
              
              USDOn
      or before March 24, 2007
              
              $
              5,000
              
              
              $
              10,000On
      or before March 24, 2008
              
              $
              5,000
              
              
              $
              20,000On
      or before March 24, 2009
              
              $
              5,000
              
              
              $
              40,000On
      or before March 24, 2010
              
              $
              5,000
              
              
              $
              50,000
 
 The
Company paid the initial CDN $5,850 (USD $5,000) upon executing the agreement as
required under the initial Property Option Agreement and made the annual
payments of CDN $5,660 (USD $5,000) and CDN $5,870 (USD $5,000) due March 24,
2008 and 2007 respectively. The Company also met its obligation with respect to
minimum exploration expenditures for 2008 and 2007.
 
 Subsequent
to December 31, 2008, the Company decided not to continue with the South Vulture
property.  Therefore, no further option payments were
paid.
 
 
  73
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  3.     MINERAL
PROPERTY INTERESTS - Continued
 
 GQ
Property
 
  On June
1, 2006 the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement giving the Company
the exclusive right and option to acquire a 100% interest in a property known as
the GQ Property located in the Kamloops Mining District in the Province of
British Columbia.   The Company could exercise the option by
making cash payments and incurring net expenditures as follows:
 
 Cash
      Payments
              
              
              ExpendituresOn
      or before June 1, 2007
              
              $
              10,000
              
              
              $
              10,000On
      or before June 1, 2008
              
              $
              20,000
              
              
              $
              20,000On
      or before June 1, 2009
              
              $
              30,000
              
              
              $
              30,000On
      or before June 1, 2010
              
              $
              40,000
              
              
              $
              50,000
 
 In
addition, the Company is subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty to the
optionor upon production. The Company, upon the payment of $500,000, has the
option (exercisable for 90 days following completion of a bankable feasibility
study) to buy up to one-half (50%) of the optionor’s net smelter return interest
(1% net smelter return).  The Company made the $20,000 property
payments on June 1, 2008 and met its obligations with respect to the minimum
exploration expenditures for 2008 and 2009.
 
 Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, the Company decided not to continue with the GQ property
and no longer maintains any interest in this property.
 
 
 Margarita
Property
 
 On July
14, 2006 the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement giving the Company
the exclusive right and option to acquire a 100% interest in a property in Santa
Cruz County, Arizona known as the Margarita Property.  The Company
paid the initial payment of CDN $39,300 (USD $35,000) upon signing the agreement
and may exercise its option by making further cash payments and incurring net
expenditures as follows:
 
 
 Date
              
              Cash
      Payments
              
              
              ExpendituresUSD
              
              
              USDOn
      or before May 31, 2007
              
              $
              50,000
              
              
              $
              75,000On
      or before May 31, 2008
              
              $
              100,000
              
              
              $
              300,000On
      or before May 31, 2009
              
              $
              125,000
              
              
              $
              300,000On
      or before May 31, 2010
              
              $
              150,000
              
              
              
              -On
      or before May 31, 2011
              
              $
              200,000
              
              
              
              -On
      or before May 31, 2012
              
              $
              200,000
              
              
              
              -
 
 In
addition, the Company was subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty to the
optionor upon production. The Company had the option (exercisable for 90 days
following completion of a bankable feasibility study) to buy the optionor’s net
smelter return interest for CDN $611,375 (USD $500,000) per 1% increment or CDN
$1,222,750 (USD $1,000,000) for the entire 2% net smelter return
interest.
 
  74
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  3.     MINERAL
PROPERTY INTERESTS - Continued
 
 Margarita Property-
continued
 
 Also on
July 14, 2006 in relation to the Company entering into the Margarita Property
Option Agreement, the Company entered into a Finder’s Fee
Agreement.  The Company agreed to pay a fee equal to 10% of the
Property Option Payments made during the first three years of the Margarita
Property Option Agreement.  Upon execution of the Margarita Property
Option Agreement the Company paid CDN $3,930 (USD $3,500) under the Finder’s Fee
Agreement.
 
 On May
31, 2007 the Company made the property option payment of CDN $54,650 (USD
$50,000) and the related finders’ fee payment of CDN $5,465 (USD $5,000) and
also met its obligations with respect to the minimum exploration expenditures
for 2007.
 
 On
January 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Assignment and Assumption
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Patriot Gold Corp. (“Patriot”) to assign the
Company’s rights and obligations under the Margarita Property Option Agreement
to Patriot.  Pursuant to the Agreement, Patriot assumed the rights,
and agreed to perform all of the duties and obligations, of the Company arising
under the Margarita Property Option Agreement. Simultaneous with the execution
and delivery of the Agreement, Patriot paid the Company CDN $201,600 (USD
$200,000) which amount represents the full payment and satisfaction for the
assignment to Patriot by the Company.  Included in the assignment to
Patriot were, without limitation, all sums incurred by the Company in connection
with its exploration of the Margarita Property which includes the refunding of
the reclamation bond previously paid by the Company to the Forest Service in
Arizona, all expenditure credits incurred by the Company prior to the execution
of the Agreement and all property option payments made to the Margarita
Property. In addition, as the Company also assigned all of its rights and
obligations under the Finders’ Fee Agreement to Patriot, it is no longer
required to make further payments.  Subsequent to the execution of the
Agreement, the Company did not retain any interest in the Margarita
Property.
 
 Mammoth
Property
 
 On July
15, 2009, the Company entered into a Property Option Agreement giving the
Company the exclusive right and option to acquire a 100% interest in a mineral
exploration permit covering the Mammoth property located in Prince George,
BC.  In addition, the Company is subject to a 2% net smelter return
royalty to the optioner upon production.  The Company paid the initial
CDN $60,000 upon signing the agreement and may exercise its option by making
further cash payments and incurring net expenditures as follows:
 
 
 Date
              
              Cash
      Payments
              
              
              ExpendituresCDN
              
              
              CDNOn
      or before April 01, 2010
              
              $
              10,000
              
              
              $
              200,000On
      or before April 01, 2011
              
              $
              10,000
              
              
              $
              200,000On
      or before April 01, 2012
              
              $
              10,000
              
              
              $
              200,000On
      or before April 01, 2013
              
              $
              10,000
              
              
              $
              400,000
 
 As of
December 31, 2009, the Company has paid CDN $70,000 in exploration expenditures
in addition to the initial CDN $60,000 paid upon signing the agreement.
Subsequent to year end, the Company did not fulfill its commitments under the
option agreement. However, the optioner agreed not to revoke the option
agreement at this time.
  75
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  4.     RECLAMATION
DEPOSIT
 
 The
Company had been granted exploration permits from the state of Arizona for the
South Vulture Property.  As part of the application process, the
Company paid a refundable deposit to the State for the estimated reclamation
costs associated with the planned exploration programs for the respective
properties.  Upon completion of any required reclamation, the Company
will receive a refund of the deposit.  This balance remains payable
from the state of Arizona as of December 31, 2009.
  5.    BRIDGE
LOANS
 
 During
2005, the Company entered into three bridge loans (the “Loans”) with minority
shareholders. All of the Loans bore interest at the Bank of Canada Prime Lending
Rate plus 1%.  The Loans were due one year from the date of the Loans
but the Company had the option to repay the Loans at any time prior to the due
date without penalty.  No security was provided for the
Loans.
  On
January 27, 2006, pursuant to three separate Loan Conversion Agreements the
Company and each of the three individual lenders agreed to convert the three
bridge loans into units of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.10 per
Unit.  Each Unit consists of one common share, one Class A warrant
giving the holder the right to
 purchase
one common share at $0.25, which is exercisable from January 27, 2009 until
January 27, 2011, and
 one Class
B warrant giving the holder the right to purchase one common share at $0.50,
which is exercisable from January 27, 2009 until January 27, 2012.  As
a result of such loan conversions, the Company has issued a total of 731,570
restricted shares of common stock, 731,570 Class A warrants, and 731,570 Class B
warrants representing a grand total of principal and accrued interest at January
27, 2006 of $73,157.
  The
weighted average fair value on Class A and B warrants at the time of settlement
was $51,210 (approximately $0.34 per warrant) which was determined using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:
  
  Risk-free
      interest rate
              4.10%Dividend
      yield
              NilExpected
      volatility
              75.8%Expected
      life of the warrants (in years)
              5.0
      to 6.0
 
 Together
with the estimated fair value of the common shares of $0.10 per share, the
aggregate fair value of the total consideration given on this conversion was
$124,367.   As a result, the Company recognized a loss of $51,210
on the Statements of Loss at December 31, 2006. There is no impact in the
current year ended December 31, 2009.
  
 6.    RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
 Except as
noted elsewhere in these financial statements, related party transactions are
disclosed as follows:
 
 On
January 23, 2006, the Company’s founding President resigned and terminated his
relationship with the Company.  On the same day 15,000,000 shares of
the common stock of the Company held by the former President were gifted by the
former President to the Company’s other founding Director, pursuant to an
assignment, dated January 23, 2006, among the former President, the other
founding Director and the Company.  No consideration was paid by the
Director for the gifting of such shares.  The gifted common shares are
subject to the Company’s right, exercisable at any time, to purchase any or all
of these shares at a purchase price of $0.01 per share.  The Company
has the right until, at its sole discretion, it decides to terminate the
agreement.  Due to this transaction having taken place between related
parties, it was not undertaken at market value.  As a result, at
December 31, 2006 the Company had recognized $1,500,000 in stock-based
compensation in respect of the estimated value of the common shares at the date
of the agreement.
   76
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  6.    RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS- continued
 
  On
September 12, 2008, a director of the Company resigned and terminated his
relationship with the Company.  On the same day 14,000,000 shares were
gifted by the former director to the Company’s incoming President, CEO, and
director, pursuant to an assignment agreement, dated September 12,
2008.  No consideration was paid by the incoming President, CEO, and
director for the gifting of such shares.  On the same day 16,000,000
shares of the common stock of the Company held by the former director were
gifted to the Company’s incoming director, pursuant to an assignment agreement,
September 12, 2008.  No consideration was paid by the incoming
director for the gifting of such shares.  The gifted common shares are
subject to the Company’s right, exercisable at any time, to purchase any or all
of these shares at a purchase price of $0.01 per share.  The Company
has the right until, at its sole discretion, it decides to terminate the
agreement.
 
 On June
30, 2009, 16,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company held by a former
director were gifted to an incoming Canadian director, pursuant to an assignment
agreement, among the parties involved and the Company.  No
consideration was exchanged for the gifting of such shares.
 
 Due to
these transactions having taken place between related parties, they were not
undertaken at market value.  As a result, as at December 31, 2009 the
Company had recognized $42,167 (2008 - $112,130), being the fair value of the
shares, in share-based compensation in respect of the estimated value of the
common shares at the date of the assignment agreement.
 
 The
Company paid one of its former Directors USD $500 per month for serving on its
Board of Directors.  Payment of fees during the year were $ nil (2008
- $6,128, 2007 - $6,472).
 
 
 7.      SHARE
CAPITAL
 
 a)      Common
Shares
 
 During
the period from inception (August 8, 2003) to December 31, 2009, the Company had
the following transactions:
 
 On
inception date, the Company issued 30 million common shares to the Company’s
founders for nil consideration.  The Company holds an irrevocable
right to repurchase all or a portion of these shares for a price of $0.01 per
share.
 
 In
October 2003, the Company issued 9.5 million units at $0.01 per
unit.  Each unit consisted of one common share, one Class A warrant
exercisable at $0.10 per share until October 30, 2008, one Class B warrant
exercisable at $1.46 per share until October 30, 2009 and one Class C warrant
exercisable at $1.52 per share until October 30, 2010.  Originally,
all of the warrants were to have vested on October 30, 2006.  By way
of letter agreements with each individual warrant holder the Company and each
respective warrant holder have agreed to extend the vesting dates of these
warrants.  The warrant vesting provisions have been extended from
October 30, 2006 to October 30, 2007 with respect to the Class A Warrants, to
April 30, 2008 with respect to the Class B Warrants and to October 30, 2008 with
respect to the Class C Warrants.  All other terms of the Warrant
agreements remained unchanged.
 
 Pursuant
to new letter agreements dated February 28, 2008 with each respective warrant
holder, the warrant vesting date was further extended from April 30, 2008 to
April 30, 2009 with respect to the Class B Warrants and from October 30, 2008 to
October 30, 2009 with respect to the Class C Warrants.  In addition,
the warrant expiration date has been extended from October 30, 2009 to October
30, 2010 with respect to the Class B Warrants and from October 30, 2010 to
October 30, 2011 with respect to the Class C Warrants.  The terms of
the Class A Warrants have not been changed and all other terms of the warrant
agreements remain unchanged.
  77
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  7.      SHARE
CAPITAL- continued
 
 a)      Common
Shares - Continued
 
 Pursuant
to new letter agreements dated September 30, 2008 with each respective warrant
holder, the warrant vesting date was further extended from April 30, 2009 to
April 30, 2010 with respect to the Class B Warrants and from October 30, 2009 to
October 30, 2010 with respect to the Class C Warrants.  In addition,
the warrant expiration date has been extended from October 30, 2008 to October
30, 2010 with respect to the Class A Warrants and from October 30, 2010 to
October 30, 2011 with respect to the Class B Warrants and from October 30, 2011
to October 30, 2012 with respect to the Class C Warrants.
 
 Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, on May 13, 2010 pursuant to new letter agreements with
certain  warrant holders, the warrant vesting date was further
extended from April 30, 2010 to April 30, 2011 with respect to the Class B
Warrants and from October 30, 2010 to October 30, 2011 with respect to the Class
C Warrants.  In addition, the warrant expiration date has been
extended from October 30, 2010 to October 30, 2012 with respect to the Class A
Warrants, from October 30, 2011 to October 30, 2013 with respect to the Class B
Warrants and from October 30, 2012 to October 30, 2014 with respect to the Class
C Warrants.
 
 Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, on May 13, 2010 pursuant to new letter agreements with
certain warrant holders, the warrant vesting date was extended from January 27,
2011 to January 27, 2013 with respect to the Class A Warrants and from January
27, 2012 to January 27, 2014 with respect to the Class B Warrants.
 
 In
January 2004, the Company issued 57,350 common shares in a private placement for
gross proceeds of $5,735.
 
 In June
2006, the Company issued 1.1 million units at $0.50 per unit for a total
offering price of $550,000.  Each unit consisted of one common share,
one Class A warrant exercisable at $1.00 per share until June 16, 2011, and one
Class B Warrant exercisable at $1.50 per share until June 16,
2012.   All of the warrants vest June 16, 2008.  The
Company calculated and allocated the fair values of $40,370 and $55,330 to Class
A and Class B warrants respectively using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following weighted average assumptions:
 
 Risk-free
      interest rate
              4.26
      to 4.29%Dividend
      yield
              NilExpected
      volatility
              95
      to 107%Expected
      life of the warrants (in years)
              5
      to 6
 During
the year, 1,000,000 common shares were issued on the exercise of warrants for
proceeds of $100,000.
 
 b)      Stock
Options
 
 On June
16, 2005, the stockholders of the Company approved the Company’s 2005 stock
option plan whereby the Company may grant options to its directors, consultants,
and employees for up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock.  The
exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on
the date of grant.  Options vest over a three-year period, unless
otherwise specified by the Board of Directors.  All options have a
10-year term.
 
 No
options were granted during 2009 or 2008 while 1,200,000 options were granted to
non-employees in 2005.  The Company revalues stock options until their
respective vesting dates.  The stock-based compensation expense is
amortized over the vesting period.  For the year ended December 31,
2009, the Company has recognized $ nil (2008 - $12,882, 2007 - $41,107) in
stock-based compensation for stock options granted in 2005.
  78
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  7.      SHARE
CAPITAL- continued
 
 b)      Stock
Options- continued
 
 Because
the Company’s common stock has not yet traded in a public market, the expected
volatility is based on comparable junior mining companies who granted similar
term options.  No options were granted in 2009 or 2008 and the
weighted average fair value of options granted during 2005 was $0.07 per
option.
 
 The
following table sets forth a summary of options granted:
 Options
      Outstanding
              
              
              Weighted
      Average Exercise PriceBalance,
      December 31, 2007
              
              
              650,000
              
              
              $
              0.25Options
      cancelled
              
              
              (150,000
              )
              
              $
              0.25Balance,
      December 31, 2008
              
              
              500,000
              
              
              $
              0.25Options
      cancelled
              
              
              (425,000
              )
              
              $
              0.25Balance,
      December 31, 2009
              
              
              75,000
              
              
              $
              0.25
 
 The
following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable
common stock options under the 2005 Plan at December 31, 2009:
 Exercise
                Price
              Options
                Outstanding
              Remaining
                Contractual
                Life
                (in
      years)
              Weighted
                Average
                Exercise
                Price
              Number
      of Options Exercisable
              Weighted
      Average Exercise
                Price$
      0.25
              75,000
              5.84
              $
      0.25
              75,000
              $
      0.25
  Subsequent
to December 31, 2009, 75,000 options were cancelled.
 
 Management
has estimated the fair value of the common shares was approximately $0.001 per
share at December 31, 2009, thus the aggregate intrinsic value of the stock
options outstanding and exercisable at December 2009 was $ nil (2008 - $ nil,
2007 - $ nil).
  
 As of
December 31, 2009, there was $ nil (2008 - $ nil) unrecognized compensation cost
related to the outstanding options. A summary of status of the Company’s
unvested stock options as of December 31, 2009 is presented below:
 Number
                of
      Options
              
              
              Weighted
                Average
                Exercise
                Price
              
              
              Weighted
      Average
                Grant
      Date Fair ValueUnvested
      at December 31, 2007
              
              
              133,333
              
              
              $
              0.25
              
              
              $
              0.07Vested
              
              
              (133,333
              )
              
              
              0.25
              
              
              
              0.07Unvested
      at December 31, 2008 and 2009
              
              
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
 
 
 
 
  79
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
   7.      SHARE
CAPITAL – Continued
 
 c)
Warrants
 
 Warrants
              
              
              Weighted
      Average Exercise PriceBalance,
      December 31, 2007 and 2008
              
              
              32,163,140
              
              
              $
              1.00Warrants
      exercised
              
              
              (1,000,000
              )
              
              $
              0.10Balance,
      December 31, 2009
              
              
              31,163,140
              
              
              $
              1.04
 
 The
following table lists the warrants outstanding at December 31,
2009.  Each warrant is exchangeable for one common share.
 
 Class
              Number
      Outstanding
              Number
      Vested
              Exercise
      Price
              Expiry
      Date
              New
      Expiry Date (1)A
              8,500,000
              8,500,000
              $0.10
              Oct
      30, 2010
              Oct
      30, 2012B
              9,500,000
              -
              $1.46
              Oct
      30, 2011
              Oct
      30, 2013C
              9,500,000
              -
              $1.52
              Oct
      30, 2012
              Oct
      30, 2014A
              731,570
              731,570
              $0.25
              Jan
      27, 2011
              Jan
      27, 2013B
              731,570
              731,570
              $0.50
              Jan
      27, 2012
              Jan
      27, 2014A
              1,100,000
              1,100,000
              $1.00
              Jun
      16, 2011
              Jun
      16, 2011B
              1,100,000
              1,100,000
              $1.50
              Jun
      16, 2012
              Jun
      16, 201231,163,140
              12,163,140
  (1)
              Subsequent
      to December 31, 2009, on May 13, 2010 vesting dates and expiration dates
      for some classes of warrants were extended. See
  7(a).
  
  
  80
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
   8.      INCOME
TAXES
 
 The tax
effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s future income
tax assets are as follows:
 
 
 December
      31,2009
              
              
              2008Tax
      loss carry-forwards
              
              $
              122,000
              
              
              $
              113,000Exploration
      expenditures
              
              
              90,000
              
              
              
              41,000Share
      issue costs
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              1,000Valuation
      allowance
              
              
              (212,000
              )
              
              
              (155,000
              )Future
      income tax asset (liability)
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
 
 
 The
provision for income taxes differs from the amount estimated using the Canadian
federal and provincial statutory income tax rates as follows:
 
 December
      31,2009
              
              
              2008
              
              
              2007Benefit
      at Canadian statutory rates
              
              $
              (80,500
              )
              
              
              (7,000
              )
              
              $
              (118,000
              )Effect
      of reduction in rate
              
              
              10,800
              
              
              
              1,000
              
              
              
              62,000Non-deductible
      stock option compensation
              
              
              12,700
              
              
              
              39,000
              
              
              
              14,000Increase
      (decrease) in valuation allowance
              
              
              57,000
              
              
              
              (33,000
              )
              
              
              42,000$
              -
              
              
              $
              -
              
              
              $
              -
 
 The
Company’s future tax assets include the tax effect relating to approximately $
nil (2008 - $5,000) of future tax deductions for share issue costs. Total future
tax deductions in connection with share issue costs is approximately $23,000
dating back to 2005.  If and when the valuation allowance related to
the tax effect of this amount is reversed the Company will recognize this
benefit as an adjustment to share capital as opposed to income tax expense in
the Statement of Loss.
 
 The
Company evaluates its valuation allowance requirements based on projected future
operations.  When circumstances change and this causes a change in
management’s judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the
impact of the change on the valuation allowance is reflected in current
income.
 
 The
Company has non-capital losses of approximately $500,000 expiring in various
amounts from 2010 to 2029.  The Company also has cumulative deferred
exploration expenses of approximately $360,000 (2008 – $183,000) to offset
future taxable income.
   81
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
   9.      UNITED
STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
 
 (a)
              The
      financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with
      Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("Canadian
      GAAP").   The differences between these principles and
      United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) are
      presented in Note 9(d).
 
 (b)  Recently
issued US accounting pronouncements:
 
 ASC 805
 
 On
February 1, 2009, the Company adopted the changes issued by FASB ASC topic 805
for business combinations. These changes require an acquirer to recognize the
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in
the acquired business at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as
of that date, with limited exceptions. This statement also requires the acquirer
in a business combination achieved in stages to recognize the identifiable
assets and liabilities, as well as the non-controlling interest in the acquired
business, at the full amounts of their fair values. ASC 805 makes various other
amendments to authoritative literature intended to provide additional guidance
or to confirm the guidance in that literature to that provided in this
statement. Our adoption of the changes to ASC 805 had no impact on the Company’s
financial statements. However, we expect the changes to ASC 805 will have an
impact on our accounting for future business combinations, but the effect is
dependent upon making acquisitions in the future.
 
 In April
2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, that
clarifies and amends ASC 805, as it applies to all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies.
This update addresses initial recognition and measurement issues, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosures regarding these assets and
liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. The Company
adopted this Statement on January 1, 2009. Implementation of this update to ASC
805 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
 ASC 815
 
 In June
2008, the FASB ratified FASB ASC 815-40 (EITF Issue 07-5 (EITF 07-5), -
Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an
Entity’s Own Stock). FASB ASC 815-40 provides that an entity should use a two
step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or
embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the
instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. It also clarifies
the impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based
employee stock option valuation instruments. FASB ASC 815-40 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those
years. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted this pronouncement. There was no
material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
 
 In March
2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)-Scope Exception Related to
Embedded Credit Derivatives.This ASU removes a
scope exception, and an entity that has a beneficial interest in securitized
financial assets that includes a credit derivative feature must evaluate that
feature for bifurcation from the host financial asset in accordance with the
guidance at ASC 815. ASU 2010-11 is effective at the beginning of a reporting
entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted at the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after
March 5, 2010. We do not expect that the adoption of ASU 2010-11 will have a
material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
 
  82
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  9.      UNITED
STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES - Continued
 
 (b)  Recently
issued US accounting pronouncements continued:
 
 ASC 855
 
 In May
2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”. This Statement
addresses accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance
sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued.
FASB ASC 855 requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has
evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, the date issued or date
available to be issued. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods ended after June 15, 2009 and is to be applied
prospectively.  The Company’s adoption of the new guidance did not
have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements
 
 In
February, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855)
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.The amendments remove
the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date in both issued and revised
financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements
revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective
application of U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the Board has clarified that if the
financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer
should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or
available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued
or available to be issued. Those amendments remove potential conflicts with the
SEC's literature. All of the amendments in this Update are effective upon
issuance of the final Update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit
debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending
after June 15, 2010.
 
 ASU No.
2009-05
 
 In August
2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-05 for changes to
measuring liabilities at fair value. These changes clarify existing guidance
that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair
value using either a valuation technique that uses a quoted price of either a
similar liability or a quoted price of an identical or similar liability when
traded as an asset, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of fair value measurements, such as an income approach (For example,
present value technique). This guidance also states that both a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability and a quoted price for the
identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no
adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value
measurements. These changes become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010.
The Company does not anticipate the adoption of these changes will have an
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
  
  83
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  9.      UNITED
STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES - Continued
 
 (b)  Recently
issued US accounting pronouncements continued:
 
 ASU No.
2009-06
 
 In
September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-06, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) –
Implementation Guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and
Disclosure Amendments for Nonpublic Entities.  This update is to
address the need for additional implementation guidance on accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes.  The implementation guidance will apply
to financial statements on nongovernmental entities that are presented in
conformity with U.S. GAAP.  The effective date is for entities that
are currently applying the standards for accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes, the guidance and disclosure amendments are effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009.  For those entities that have deferred the application of
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with paragraph
740-10-65-1(e), the guidance and disclosure amendments are effective upon
adoption of those standards.  The adoption of this standard did not
have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
 
 ASU No.
2009-9
 
 In
September 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-09, “Accounting for Investments –
Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to
Non-Employees.  This update is an amendment to ASC 323-10-S99 and
505-50-S99.  The amendment to ASC 323-10-S99 provides guidance on the
accounting by an investor for stock-based compensation based on the investor’s
stock granted to employees of an equity method investee.  Investors
that are SEC registrants should classify any income or expense resulting from
application of this guidance in the same income statement caption as the equity
in earnings (or losses) of the investee.  The amendment to ASC
505-50-S99 clarifies the accounting by the grantee or grantor in transactions
involving equity instruments granted to other than employees if the accounting
does not reflect the same commitment date or similar values and is effective
September 17, 2009.  The adoption of this standard did not have a
material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
 
 ASC 105
 
 On
October 31, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 105 -- Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, which established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“the Codification”), as the single official source of
authoritative, nongovernmental, U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal
securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The
FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead, the FASB will issue
Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will not be
authoritative in their own right, as they will only serve to update the
Codification. These changes and the Codification itself do not change GAAP. The
Codification is designed to simplify U.S. GAAP into a single, topically ordered
structure. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of
authority. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company refers to the Codification in
respect of the appropriate accounting standards throughout this document as
“FASB ASC”. Other than the manner in which new accounting guidance is
referenced, the adoption of these changes had no impact on the Company’s
financial statements.ASU No.
2009-17
 
 In
December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17 for Improvements to Financial
Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, which amends
ASC topic 810. The Board's
  84
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  9.      UNITED
STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES - Continued
 
 (b)  Recently
issued US accounting pronouncements continued:
 
 objective
in issuing this Statement is to improve financial reporting by enterprises
involved with variable interest entities. The Board undertook this project to
address (1) the effects on certain provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as a
result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in
FASB Statement 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, and (2)
constituent concerns about the application of Certain key provisions of
Interpretation 46(R), including those in which the accounting and disclosures
under the Interpretation do not always provide timely and useful information
about an enterprise's involvement in a variable interest entity. This Statement
shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity's first annual
reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within
that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods
thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. We do not anticipate the adoption
of these changes will have an impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
 
 ASU No.
2010-01
 
 In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01 “Accounting for Distributions to
Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash” with Equity (Topic
505).  The objective of this update is to address diversity in
practice related to the accounting for a distribution to shareholders that
offers them the ability to elect to receive their entire distribution in cash or
shares of equivalent value with a potential limitation on the total amount of
cash that shareholders can elect to receive in
aggregate.  Historically, some entities have accounted for the stock
portion of the distribution as a new share issuance that is reflected in
earnings per share (“EPS”) prospectively.  Other entities have
accounted for the stock portion of the distribution as a stock dividend by
retroactively restating shares outstanding and EPS for all periods
presented.  The amendments in this update clarify that the stock
portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive
cash or shares with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all
shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share
issuance, rather than a stock dividend, thus eliminating the diversity in
practice.  The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and
annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a
retrospective basis.  The adoption of ASU 2010-01 did not have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
 ASU No.
2010-06
 
 In
January, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 on codification, Fair value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820-10), improving disclosures about fair
value measurements.  This update provides amendments to Topic 820 that
will provide more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets
and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs
used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers
between Level 1, 2, and 3.  The standard adds new disclosure and
clarifies existing disclosure requirements.  The new standard requires
disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods of publicly traded companies in addition to the annual disclosure
required at year-end.  The provisions of the new standard are
effective for the interim periods ending after June 15, 2009.  The
adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
 
 
 
 
 
  85
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  9.      UNITED
STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES - Continued
 
 (b)  Recently
issued US accounting pronouncements continued:
 
 ASU No.
2010-09
 
 In
February, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855)
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.The amendments remove
the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date in both issued and revised
financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements
revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective
application of U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the Board has clarified that if the
financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer
should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or
available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued
or available to be issued. Those amendments remove potential conflicts with the
SEC's literature. All of the amendments in this Update are effective upon
issuance of the final Update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit
debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending
after June 15, 2010.
 
 (c)
              Impact between
      Canadian GAAP and US GAAP
 
 The
impact between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP on the financial statements is as
follows:
 
 Warrant
extensions
 
 During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company extended the life of its
warrants.  Under US GAAP, such an extension resulted in a total
incremental fair value of $8,051 to be recorded as a dividend which had no
impact on the Company’s loss per share. There was no modification of warrant
terms in 2009. The impact of the warrant extension on the Company’s financial
statements is as follows:
 
 2009
              
              
              2008
              
              
              2007
              
              
              AUGUST
      8, 2003 (inception) to December 31,
      2008Statements of Loss and Comprehensive
      LossNet
      loss for the year per Canadian and US GAAP
              
              $
              (268,316
              )
              
              $
              (23,415
              )
              
              $
              (346,255
              )
              
              $
              (2,789,803
              )Dividends
      from extension of warrants
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (8,051
              )
              
              
              -
              
              
              
              (8,051
              )Net
      loss applicable to common shareholders under US GAAP
              
              $
              (268,316
              )
              
              $
              (31,466
              )
              
              $
              (346,255
              )
              
              $
              (2,797,854
              )Basic
      and diluted loss per share:Canadian
      and US GAAP
              
              $
              (0.01
              )
              
              $
              (0.00
              )
              
              $
              (0.01
              )
 
  86
 RUSH
METALS CORP.
 (formerly
AMERICAN GOLDRUSH CORP.)
 (An
Exploration Stage Company)
 Notes
to the Financial Statements
 (Stated
in Canadian Dollars)
  9.           UNITED
STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES – Continued
 
 (c)
              Impact between
      Canadian GAAP and US GAAP
 
 
 The
Company calculated the fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following assumptions:
 
 Risk-free
      interest rate
              2.86
      to 3.03%Dividend
      yield
              NilExpected
      volatility
              93%Expected
      life of the warrants (in years)
              2.08
      to 3.67
 
 There is
no impact upon the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash
flows as a result of the above GAAP difference. There were no differences
between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2007.
 
 ASC 740 (FIN
48)
 
 In June
2006, the FASB issued FASB ASC 740 Income Taxes (Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes,(“FIN 48”)). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements
and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company has evaluated its tax
positions for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and
determined that it has no uncertain tax positions requiring financial statement
recognition.
 
 Under FIN
48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on income tax expense must be
recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained.
An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has 50% or less
likelihood of being sustained.
 
 We accrue
interest and penalties on our uncertain tax positions as a component of our
provision for income taxes. There was no amount of interest and penalties
accrued during 2009, 2008 or 2007.. We file one income tax return in Canada. Our
income tax returns are generally considered closed to examination for years
prior to 2005.
 
  87


ITEM
19.  EXHIBITS





Exhibit
              Numbers
            Description
      of Document1.1(1)
            Articles
      of  Incorporation of  the Company1.2(1)
            Articles
      of Amendment1.3(1)
            By-Laws  of  the  Company2.1(1)
            Specimen  Common  Stock  Certificate2.2(1)
            Form
      of Class A Warrant – October 20032.3(1)
            Form
      of Class B Warrant – October 20032.4(1)
            Form
      of Class C Warrant – October 20032.5(2)
            Form
      of Class A Warrant – January 20062.6(2)
            Form
      of Class B Warrant – January 20062.7(3)
            Form
      of Subscription Agreement – June 20062.8(3)
            Form
      of Class A Warrant – June 20062.9(3)
            Form
      of Class B Warrant – June 20062.10(12)
            Form
      of Warrant Extension letter agreement dated February 28,
    20084.1(1)
            Agreement
      between the Company and Ronald Blomkamp dated September 30,
      20034.2(1)
            Agreement
      between the Company and Scott Praill dated September 30,
    20034.3(1)
            Property
      Option Agreement with Randy Polischuk4.4(4)
            Amendment
      No. 1 to the Polischuk Property Option Agreement4.5(5)
            Assignment
      Agreement dated January 23, 2006, among the Company, Scott Praill, and
      Ronald C. Blomkamp





4.6(6)
            Bridge
      Loan Conversion Agreement dated January 27, 2006 between the Company and
      Igman Consulting4.6(6)
            Bridge
      Loan Conversion Agreement dated January 27, 2006 between the Company and
      Fred Coombes4.6(6)
            Bridge
      Loan Conversion Agreement dated January 27, 2006 between the Company and
      Trevor Newton4.7(7)
            Property
      Option Agreement dated March 24, 2006, between the Company and Fred
      Brost4.8(8)
            Property
      Option Agreement dated as of June 1, 2006, between the Company and Warner
      Gruenwald4.9(9)
            Property
      Option Agreement dated as of July 14, 2006, between the Company and James
      Sorrell4.10(9)
            Finder’s
      Fee Agreement dated July 14, 2006 between the Company and Fred
      Brost4.11(11)
            Assignment
      and Assumption Agreements, dated January 29, 2008, by and between Rush
      Metals Corp. (formerly American Goldrush Corp.) and Patriot Gold
      Corp.11.1(10)
            Code
      of Ethics12.1*
            Certification
      of Principal Executive and Financial Officer13.1*
            Section
      1350 Certification14.1*
            Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm which appears in this
      Form 20-F




1.    Previously
filed with the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1, Registration No.
333-120722, submitted to the SEC on November 22, 2004.


2.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 6-K submitted to the SEC on January 27,
2006.


3.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 6-K submitted to the SEC on June 16,
2006.


4.
Previously filed with the Company’s amendment to the registration statement on
Form F-1, Registration No. 333-120722, submitted to the SEC on January 25,
2005.


5.
Previously filed with Mr. Praill’s Schedule 13D submitted to the SEC on January
23, 2006.


6.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 6-K submitted to the SEC on January 27,
2006.


7.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 6-K submitted to the SEC on March 24,
2006.


8.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 6-K submitted to the SEC on June 1,
2006.


9.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 6-K submitted to the SEC on July 14,
2006.


10.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 20-F submitted to the SEC on May 25,
2006.


11.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 6-K submitted to the SEC on February 1,
2008.


12.
Previously filed with the Company’s form 6-K submitted to the SEC on March 6,
2008.





* Filed
herewith.


88





Signature
Page





Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 12g of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form
20-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.








Rush
Metals Corp. (formerly American Goldrush Corp.) SEC File No. 000-51337
Registrant





Dated:
June 25, 2010          Signed: /s/  Paul
Noland


Paul
Noland


Director, Chairman,
President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer and
Secretary










Dated:
June 25, 2010          Signed:
/s/  Robert Coale


Robert
Coale


Director








Dated:
June 25, 2010          Signed: /s/  Keith
Diakiw


Keith
Diakiw


Director








Dated:
June 25, 2010          Signed: /s/  Paul
Uppal


Paul
Uppal


Director








Dated:
June 25, 2010          Signed: /s/  Paul
Brisset


Pol
Brisset


Director