alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2448 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2448

To suspend temporarily the duty on footwear for women (other than house 
slippers, tennis shoes, basketball shoes, gym shoes, training shoes and 
   the like and other than work footwear), valued $15/pair or higher.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on footwear for women (other than house 
slippers, tennis shoes, basketball shoes, gym shoes, training shoes and 
   the like and other than work footwear), valued $15/pair or higher.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN (OTHER THAN HOUSE SLIPPERS, TENNIS SHOES, 
              BASKETBALL SHOES, GYM SHOES, TRAINING SHOES AND THE LIKE 
              AND OTHER THAN WORK FOOTWEAR), VALUED $15/PAIR OR HIGHER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Footwear for women  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (other than house                                                  31/2015.......
                        slippers, tennis
                        shoes, basketball
                        shoes, gym shoes,
                        training shoes
                        and the like and
                        other than work
                        footwear), valued
                        $15/pair or
                        higher (provided
                        for in subheading
                        6402.99.31)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearmouth@mirant.com> Date: 10/13/2010 2:15 PM Subject: Re: ICR Questionnaire Attachments: pic03217.jpg

Greetings Ann, Your extension request has been approved by EPA. Your deadline is October 29, 2010 for those three Mirant facilities that are required to complete Part D of the questionnaire.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic03217.jpg)

From: "Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearmouth@mirant.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/12/2010 08:49 AM

Subject: ICR Questionaire

Hi Jezebele, In going through the wrap-up of the ICRs for our Maryland facilities I found that the definition of “process water” for this submittal is different than what I typically regarded it to be (per CWA definition, leachate is not a “process” water). Knowing this, we will now have to complete section D for the 3 facilities with associated ash sites. I was hoping to get a 2 week extension in order to make complete submittals on the 29th of this month. We have already completed and submitted the ICRs for 4 of our other plants, but as there were no ash sites associated with th ose facilities, this is not an issue for them. Thanks for your considerat ion in this matter. Please let me know as soon as possible if we can get this extra time. Regards,

-a

ann wearmouth environmental engineer mirant mid-atlantic, llc (301) 955-9028From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearmouth@mirant.com> Date: 7/22/2010 12:02 PM Subject: Re: ICR Extension Request Attachments: pic07419.gif; ICR Extension Request.PDF

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the fo llowing Mirant Mid-Atlantic LLC facilities:

Dickerson Generating Station Chalk Point Generating Station Morgantown Generating Plant

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. If you need assistance during the completion of the stea m electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic07419.gif)

From: "Wearmouth, Ann" <ann.wearmouth@mirant.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/09/2010 10:09 AM

Subject: ICR Extension Request

I’ve attached a letter that was also mailed from our offices today requesting an extension to file the ICR for our Dickerson, Morgantown and Chalk Point Generating Stations. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to e-mail or phone me. Regards, Ann

ann wearmouth environmental engineer mirant mid-atlantic, llc (301) 955-9028
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CASSANDRA CHAN
, Appellant,

v.

HUMANE SOCIETY OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, and JULIA SHEEHAN,

DVM
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 22

- 850

[ April 13, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2021CA000529

.

Marcy I. LaHart of Marcy I. LaHart PA, Micanopy, for appellant.

Daniel S. Weinger and Jermaine K. Jackson of Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo, Cohen & Peterfriend, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
            (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
                             Exhibit 99.2

I, Thomas R. Dickinson, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) of Miltope Group, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certifies that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 29. 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



Name: /s/ Thomas R. Dickinson
      -----------------------
Date: November 13, 2002
      -----------------
Exhibit
10.5




Terms of
Employment Arrangement
 between
Slavie Federal Savings Bank
 and
Sophie Torin Wittelsberger
 
 Mrs.
Wittelsberger is employed
on an at-will basis at a rate of pay of $71,760.00 as of January 1,
2009.  Mrs. Wittelsberger is also eligible
to receive annual salary increases as determined by the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors and an annual bonus as determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors.  She is also entitled to all
benefits available to full-time employees of Slavie Federal Savings
Bank.  Mrs. Wittelsberger received a bonus
of $15,007.63 for 2008, which was paid in March, 2009.
Exhibit 10.7
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS
OF
ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
On February 24, 2022, the Board of Directors of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), unanimously approved and adopted the following amendment to the Corporation’s Second Amended and Restated By-Laws (the “By-Laws”) to be effective immediately:
		1.
	Section 3.2 of the By-Laws is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


The Board shall consist of at least one but no more than fifteen directors, the exact number of directors to be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by affirmative vote of a majority of the whole Board and such exact number shall be two until otherwise determined by resolution adopted by affirmative vote of a majority of the whole Board. As used in this Article 3, the term “whole Board” means the total number of directors which the Corporation would have if there were no vacancies.
		2.
	Except as set forth herein, all other provisions of the By-Laws shall remain in full force and effect.
Exhibit 10.39

 

AMENDMENT #1

 

To Letter of Intent for Proposed CRADA #2166

 

“Pre-Clinical and Clinical Development of 1-Methyl-[d]-Tryptophan as an Anti-Cancer Agent”

 

The purpose of this amendment is to change certain terms of the Letter of Intent (LOI) for the proposed Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) entitled “Pre-Clinical and Clinical Development of  1-Methyl-[d]-Tryptophan as an Anti-Cancer Agent.” These changes are reflected below, and except for these changes, all other provisions of the original CRADA LOI remain in full force and effect. Two originals of this amendment are provided for execution; one is to remain with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the other copy is to remain with the Collaborator.

 

1.               Upon final signature, the term of this CRADA Letter of Intent is extended for six months from November 23, 2007 to May 23, 2008.

 

2.               Dr. Lee Jia is removed as an NCI Principal Investigator. The NCI Principal Investigators are Dr. Sherry Ansher and Dr. Howard Streicher.

 

 

	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
For the National Cancer Institute:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/Anna D. Barker
    	
 
    	
01/08/08
    	
 
    
	
Anna D. Barker, Ph.D.
    	
 
    	
Date
    
	
Deputy Director, NCI
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
For NewLink Genetics Corporation:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/Charles Link
    	
 
    	
1/17/08
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Date
Robert WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3339

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-40684-99, 33-79294-99, 333-03949-99, 333-03951-99, 333-03953-99, 333-42546-99, 333-105796-99 and 333-125296) of Lifeline Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2006 relating to the financialstatements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston,Massachusetts 

March 15, 2006
nlsnnv-ex1014f_442.htm



Exhibit 10.14(f)

 

Term Sheet for Karthik Rao

Approved February 3, 2021 

 


	
Name
	
Context
	
Approved

	
Karthik Rao
	
•    Last pay change in November 2019

•    To be appointed S16 Officer on Feb 4th
	
•    Increase in LTI by $400,000 from $800,000 to $1,200,000 (+50%)

•    Increase TDC by $400,000 from $2,000,000 to $2,400,000 (+20%)
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 21
- 00133
- CR
IN RE SAMUEL LYN REAVES
Original Proceeding
From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. F49661

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Samuel Lyn Reaves, a prison inmate, requests that this Court issue a writ of mandamus directing David R. Lloyd, the District Clerk for Johnson County, to file relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus, assign ancillary numbers, and allow relator access to the courts as required by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. As a Court of Appeals, we have no jurisdiction to com pel a district clerk to act except to enforce our jurisdiction. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE § 22.221(a), (b). Relator has not alleged any need
for this Court to enforce that jurisdiction. Accordingly, r elator’s a pplication for w rit of m andamus , filed on June 14, 2021, is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.In re Reaves Page 2 Relator also presented with his petition a motion for leave to file his petition for writ of mandamus. A motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is required when relief by mandamus is sought from the Court of Criminal Appeals. T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 72.1. The requirement for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus at the court of appeals level was eliminated in 1997. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52, Notes and Comments. Thus, under the applicable rule s, a motion for leave to file the petition is unnecessary if mandamus relief is sought from an intermediate court of appeals, such as th is Court. The petition was filed without regard to the motion for leave to file it. Accordingly, the motion
for leave t o file a petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See In re Dawson , 10

- 19

- 00427

- CR, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 10725 (Tex. App.

— Waco Dec. 11, 2019, orig. proceeding) (not designated for publication)

.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justic e Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Davis 1 Petition dismissed Motion dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 30 , 2021 Do not publish [OT06]

1 The Honorable Rex Davis , Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
EX-10.3






Revolving Note




$35,750,000 October 6, 2011



For Value Received, the undersigned (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the
order of RBS Citizens, N.A. dba Charter One (the “Lender”), on the Maturity Date (as
defined in the Credit Agreement referred to below) the principal amount of Thirty-Five Million
Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($35,750,000), or such lesser principal amount of Loans
(as defined in the Credit Agreement referred to below) payable by Borrower to Lender on such
Revolving Credit Termination Date under that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011,
among Borrower, Lenders from time to time party thereto, KeyBank National Association, as
Agent and a Lender (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing
from time to time, the “Agreement;” the terms defined therein being used herein as therein
defined).



Borrower promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Revolving Credit Loan
from the date of such Revolving Credit Loan until such principal amount is paid in full, at such
interest rates, and payable at such times as are specified in the Agreement.



All payments of principal and interest shall be made to Agent for the account of Lender in
United States dollars in immediately available funds at Agent’s Principal Office.



If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest,
to be paid upon demand, from the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as
well as after judgment) computed at the Post-Default Rate set forth in the Agreement.



This Revolving Note is one of the “Revolving Credit Notes” referred to in the Agreement.
Reference is hereby made to the Agreement for rights and obligations of payment and prepayment,
events of default and the right of Lender to accelerate the maturity hereof upon the occurrence of
such events. Revolving Credit Loans made by Lender shall be evidenced by one or more loan accounts
or records maintained by Lender in the ordinary course of business. Lender may also attach
schedules to this Revolving Credit Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its
Revolving Credit Loans and payments with respect thereto.



Borrower, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment,
protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and non-payment of this Revolving Credit
Note.



Borrower agrees to pay all collection expenses, court costs and attorney costs (whether or not
litigation is commenced) which may be incurred by Lender in connection with the collection or
enforcement of this Revolving Credit Note, all as further set forth in the Agreement.



THIS REVOLVING NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this Revolving Credit Note to be duly executed on
the date first above written.



GRUBB& ELLIS HEALTHCARE REITT II


HOLDINGS, LP



By: Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT II, Inc.


Its: General Partner



By: /s/ Shannon K S Johnson


Its: Authorized Representative
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.G. Barry Corporation for the
quarterly period ended January 2, 2010;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: February 10, 2010
    /s/ Greg A. TunneyPrinted Name:
    Greg A. TunneyTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1308 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 90
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1308

                          [Report No. 118-38]

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
  extend the deadline for the Secretary of the Interior to promulgate 
 regulations implementing title IV of that Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2023

 Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Ms. Smith) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

                              June 8, 2023

               Reported by Mr. Schatz, with an amendment
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
  extend the deadline for the Secretary of the Interior to promulgate 
 regulations implementing title IV of that Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

<DELETED>SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO PROMULGATE CERTAIN 
              REGULATIONS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 413(a) of the Indian Self-Determination and 
Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5373(a)) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``21 months'' 
        and inserting ``35 months''; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``30 months'' 
        and inserting ``47 months''.</DELETED>

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO PROMULGATE CERTAIN REGULATIONS.

    Section 413(a) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education 
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5373(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``21 months'' and 
        inserting ``38 months''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``30 months'' and 
        inserting ``50 months''.
                                                        Calendar No. 90

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1308

                          [Report No. 118-38]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
  extend the deadline for the Secretary of the Interior to promulgate 
 regulations implementing title IV of that Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 8, 2023

                       Reported with an amendment
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael GUZMAN-ORANTES, aka Raul Galan, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50324.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Gonzalo P. Curiel, Esq., Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Steven S. Lubliner, Law Offices of Steven S. Lubliner, Petaluma, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Guzman-Orantes appeals his 41-month sentence following a conviction by guilty plea for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation after having been convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We decline to reach on direct appeal Guzman-Orantes’ sole contention that trial counsel was ineffective. *See United States v. Robinson,*967 F.2d 287, 290 (9th Cir.1992) (stating that ineffective assistance of counsel is more properly raised on collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 unless the record is sufficient or there is an obvious denial of adequate representation).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Sherrard SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1553

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.