alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2579 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2579

To suspend temporarily the duty on insulated food or beverage bags with 
  outer surface of man made fiber, with removable inner liner of hard 
  plastic, certified by the importer as containing over 40 percent by 
        weight of recycled plastics, exceeding 300 mm in length.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on insulated food or beverage bags with 
  outer surface of man made fiber, with removable inner liner of hard 
  plastic, certified by the importer as containing over 40 percent by 
        weight of recycled plastics, exceeding 300 mm in length.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INSULATED FOOD OR BEVERAGE BAGS WITH OUTER SURFACE OF MAN 
              MADE FIBER, WITH REMOVABLE INNER LINER OF HARD PLASTIC, 
              CERTIFIED BY THE IMPORTER AS CONTAINING OVER 40 PERCENT 
              BY WEIGHT OF RECYCLED PLASTICS, EXCEEDING 300 MM IN 
              LENGTH.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Insulated food or   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        beverage bags                                                      31/2015.......
                        with outer
                        surface of man
                        made fiber, with
                        removable inner
                        liner of hard
                        plastic,
                        certified by the
                        importer as
                        containing over
                        40 percent by
                        weight of
                        recycled
                        plastics,
                        exceeding 300 mm
                        in length
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        4202.92.08)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. J.E.S., Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4565

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Brandon R. Christian, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Audrey Reich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: October 3, 2007
|---------------------

|By: |  | /s/ Audrey Reich                                       
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|   
|    |  | Audrey Reich                                           
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2621 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2621

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rooftop cargo bags.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rooftop cargo bags.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ROOFTOP CARGO BAGS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Cargo bags that     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        affix to the roof                                                  31/2015.......
                        rack of a
                        vehicle, with an
                        outer surface of
                        textile materials
                        of man-made
                        fibers (provided
                        for in subheading
                        4202.92.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 107A/22 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 107A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6122 March 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 107A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6122 March 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2018/C 107 A/01 | Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/357/18 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2018/C 107 A/01

Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/357/18 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 100/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.100.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 100 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 553 April 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.100.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 100

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 553 April 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | OLAF |
| 2012/C 100/01 | Activity Report of the OLAF Supervisory Committee (January 2011-November 2011) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

OLAF

2012/C 100/01

Activity Report of the OLAF Supervisory Committee (January 2011-November 2011)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Tracy WINSTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50108.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2004.

Decided May 20, 2004.

Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Garth E. Hire, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy FPD, Federal Public Defender’s Offlee, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BROWNING, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant Darryl Tracy Winston timely appeals his conviction of and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

1. The district court applied the correct legal standard under *Batson v. Kentucky,*476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). *See United States v. Steele,*298 F.3d 906 (9th Cir.) (reviewing for clear error), *cert. denied,*537 U.S. 1096, 123 S.Ct. 710, 154 L.Ed.2d 646 (2002). The court considered the relevant *786circumstances surrounding the peremptory challenge to Juror Small and permissibly found that Defendant failed to establish a prima facie case of discriminatory motivation for the challenge.

2. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s exclusion, during cross-examination, of the sustained complaint against Officer Shears. *United States v. Geston,*299 F.3d 1130, 1137 (9th Cir.2002). The court permissibly concluded that the probative value of the material was substantially outweighed by the potential for unfair prejudice, jury confusion, and a “mini-trial” about the circumstances surrounding the complaint.

3. The district court erred when it violated the requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(4)(A)(¿¿) by failing to address Defendant personally (rather than addressing counsel) in order to permit him to allocate. Because the district court had remaining discretion to impose a lower sentence than it in fact imposed, including discretion to depart downward as had been requested, we cannot say that the error was harmless. *United States v. Mejia,*953 F.2d 461, 468 (9th Cir.1991), *abrogation on other grounds recognized by United States v. Caperna,*251 F.3d 827, 830-31 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we remand for resentencing.

4. The district court permissibly applied a two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2. Defendant did not merely flee; while doing so he invaded a stranger’s apartment while armed, which recklessly created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person.1

Conviction AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing in a manner consistent with this disposition.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Although we are remanding for resentencing, we reach this issue now for the sake of judicial economy; if the record remains unchanged with respect to this enhancement, it is not erroneous.
Joseph K. MAGRINI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3597

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
Matt LaPenta (Abt Associates) spoke with Pamela Wi lliams (Cal ifornia Retailers Association) on

1/20/2011.

According to CRA, the recordkeeping requirements did not add any significant burden for CA retailers. CA retailers just needed to add language to th eir supplier agreements to specify that composite wood products supplied must be CARB compliant; they already require their fabricators to comply with many other requirements, so adding one more to the supplier agreement was not a big change. Ms. W illiam s also said that her members, which are the larger retailers, already had electronic recordkeeping s ystems that were sufficient for meeting the CARB requirements. She said that small retailers would also typically keep purchasing records for two years anywa y, but many of them use paper records.

She said that retailers concerns about the CARB rule were mainly with the sell through dates, but CARB was responsive to these concerns so it did not end up being a problem.
Myron K. BELL v. Hattie Virginia BELL et al.

2150332

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

No. 08

- 16

- 00128

- CV

IN RE: §

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDI NG

§

TIFFANY SUZANNE WALLIS, IN MANDAMUS

§

Relator.

§

§

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s motion to dismiss and concludes the

motion should be granted and the original proceeding should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss

the original proceeding. We further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDER ED THIS 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2016.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; “Comparative Evaluation of Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Birth Outcomes”.                    

*Date:*                         May 6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To provide concept review of proposed concept review.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasamail@.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 7, 2009.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-8670 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000829

24-JAN-2019

07:44 AM
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 73 (Friday, April 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17826-17829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8587]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-13]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-13 with attached transmittal, and 
policy justification.

    April 9, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD, Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 17827]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17AP09.005


[[Page 17828]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17AP09.006


[[Page 17829]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17AP09.007

[FR Doc. E9-8587 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, M. H. McIlvain, President and CFO, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of  Golden  Chief
Resources, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: September 21, 2005

By:/s/ M. H. McIlvain
-------------------------------------
M. H. McIlvain
President and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GILBERT ARCIDES,

 Appellant,

v. 

RAUL ANGEL ROJAS AND 

DEEPWELL ENERGY SERVICES, LLC,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00046-CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas 

(TC# 20-01-23349-CVR)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s second motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until February 25, 2023. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT. 

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jessica Z. Barger, the Appellee’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 25, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of February, 2023.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                         117,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,779,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,785,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,584,000
<PP&E>                                      16,906,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,463,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,890,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,985,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,027,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,890,000
<SALES>                                      7,444,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,444,000
<CGS>                                        5,506,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,349,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             166,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Leandre SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5376

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Carolyn O. O'NEAL, Appellant, v. ST. LUCIE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Ascension Insurance and Employers Mutual Inc., Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D17-0946

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ernest BILLIZONE, Sr. v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

NO. 2017-CI-0179

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Writ not considered* Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).