alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u r t o f A p p e a l s

o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

A T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Th e C o u rt o f A p p e a l s h e re b y p a sse s t h e f o l l o w i n g o rd e r:

A 2 0 A 0 4 9 7

. V

I C T O R H O D G E S v

. T H E ST A T E

.

A j u r y f o u n d V i c t o r H

o d g e s g u i l t y o f m a l i c e m

u r d e r

, r o b b e r y

, a

n d a g g r a v a t e d

a ssa u l t

, a n d t h e t r i a l c o u r t se n t e n c e d H o d g e s t o l i f

e i m p r i s o n m e n t

. H

o d g e s f i l e d a

m o t i o n f o r n e w t r i a l

, w h i c h t

h e t r i a l c o u r t d e n i e d

, a

n d H o d g e s f i l e d t h i s d i r e c t a

p p e a l

.

H o d g e s h a s f

i l e d a m o t i o n t o t

r a n sf e r t h e c a se t o t

h e Su p r e m e C o u r t

.

U n d e r o u r C o n st i t

u t i o n

, t h e Su p r e m e C o u r t h a s a

p p e l l a t e j u r i sd i c t i o n o v e r “ [ a ] l l

c a se s i n w h i c h a s e n t e n c e o f d e a t h w a s i m p o s e d o r c o u l d b e i m

p o s e d

. ” G a

. C o n st

. o f

1 9 8 3

, A r t

. V I

, Se c

. V I

, Pa

r

. I I I ( 8 )

. B e c a

u se a p e n a l t

y o f d e a t h c a n b e i m p o se d f o r t h e

c r i m e o f m a l i c e m u r d e r

, j u r i s d i c t i o n i s p r o p e r i n t h e Su p r e m e C o u r t

. Se e O C G A §

1 6

- 5

- 1 ( a )

, ( e ) ( 1 ) ; N

e a l v

. S t a t e

, 2 9 0 G a

. 5 6 3

, 5 7 2 ( 7 2 2 SE 2 d 7 6 5 ) ( 2 0 1 2 ) ( H

u n st e i n

,

C

. J.

, c o n c u r r i n g ) ; se e a l s o S t a t e v

. Th o rn t o n

, 2 5 3 G a

. 5 2 4

, 5 2 4 ( 1 ) ( 3 2 2 SE 2 d 7 1 1 )

( 1 9 8 4 ) ( d i r e c t i n g t

h i s C o u r t t o t

r a n sf e r “ a l l c a se s i n w h i c h e i t

h e r a se n t e n c e o f d e a

t h o r

o f l i f e i m p r i so n m e n t h a s b e e n i m

p o se d u p o n c o n v i c t i o n o f m u r d e r ” )

.

A c c o r d i n g l y

, H

o d g e s’ s m o t i o n t o t

r a n s f e r i s G R A N T E D a n d t h i s a p p e a l i s

h e r e b y T R

A N SFE R R E D t o t h e Su p r e m e C o u r t f

o r d i sp o si t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t

r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t

h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 14, 2019

11/14/2019
# Official Journal C 511/17 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 511 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6417 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 511

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6417 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 511/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 511/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 17 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 511/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 511/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Fernando GONZALEZ-ROMERO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3896

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT  32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Community Bancshares, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 ("Report"), each of the
undersigned certify that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: August 14, 2003                   By:/s/ Patrick M. Frawley
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Patrick M. Frawley
                                           Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Community Bancshares, Inc. and
will be retained by Community Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      32
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,009
<PP&E>                                       1,126,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 813,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,592
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   346,894
<SALES>                                         29,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,582
<CGS>                                           17,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,288
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Garnett, Kim Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 11:59 AM To: Ogulei, David Subject: FW: Xact mm CEMS

Per your request!

From: John Cooper [mailto:jacooper@cooperenvironmental.c om] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:01 PM To: Garnett, Kim Cc: Bivins, Dan; andreag@cooperenvironmental.com; krag p@cooperenvironmental.com Subject: Xact mm CEMS

Kim,

As you know, I have responded to yours and Dan’s ea rlier questions concerning the feasibility of using the Xact multimetals CEMS on hazardous waste incinerators (HWI) s uch as the Veolia HWI in Sauget, IL. The details o f my responses are in these earlier emails (May 28 th and June 14 th ), as well as Eli Lilly and Company’s Alternative M onitoring Petitions submitted in 2005. Of particular relevance are the “Method 301 Evaluation of Candidate Conditional Met hods” and

more specifically Section 7.0 “Range of Method Applicati on.” This previously sent material demonstrates the robu stness of the Xact methodology and instrumentation over a broad range of source conditions. In addition, CES ’ conditions of sale are no different than those of other manufactu rers of pollution control and monitoring instrument ation. These results plus those in the material I sent previousl y clearly show that the Xact has demonstrated its a bility to operate accurately and reliably for extended periods of tim e (6+ years) under a wide range of stack conditions that included those likely to be found in the Veolia stack, and t hat such monitors are commercially available from C ooper Environmental Services LLC.

Let me emphasize that it should be clear from this material previously sent that the Xact multi-metals CEMS has demonstrated its applicability under a wide range o f conditions including the conditions expected at t he Sauget Veolia HWI; i.e. both wet and dry conditions and temperatu res exceeding 350°F. It should also be clear that Cooper Environmental Services LLC is a viable commercial s upplier of the Xact CEMS, having developed them and sold them commercially prior to licensing the Pall Corp. to b uild and sell the units. CES has all the same staf f and facilities that that were used to build them before licensing the techno logy to Pall and worked closely with Pall over the past two years helping them learn to build Xacts. In addition, ev en though the Pall Corp. announced just last Februa ry that they were vacating the license agreement, CES took its first new order for an Xact in March and shipped it to Ch ina in June, three and a half months later. In addition, even though each facility has its own unique set of probe, tran sport, data acquisition and data handling requirements, these a re typically handled simultaneously with the buildi ng of the Xact or any other CEMS. As such, CES should have no proble m delivering, installing and starting up an Xact-ba sed multi-metal CEMS within six months of receiving a purchase orde r and down payment.

John

John A. Cooper, Ph. D. President Cooper Environmental Services LLC 10180 SW Nimbus Ave.
Suite J6 Portland, OR 97223
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Viosolar Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending July 31, 2011, and as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick Walchuk, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: January 31, 2012
By:
/s/ Rick WalchukName: Rick WalchukTitle: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION(Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, Steven D. Foster, the Chief Financial Officer of Parallel PetroleumCorporation (“Parallel”), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Parallel forthe quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the periodic reporting requirements of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in that Form 10-Q/AReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof Parallel Petroleum Corporation.         Dated: May 9, 2006   /s/ Steven D. Foster                 Steven D. Foster,        Chief Financial Officer       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel Petroleum Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.48

 

LICENSE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

 

Inasmuch as NewLink Genetics Corporation of Ames, Iowa, and the Medical College of Georgia Research Institute of Augusta Georgia, have a valid and existing License Agreement related to the use of Indoleamine-2,3-Dioxygenase and its inhibitors in Immuno-regulation [*] dated September 13, 2005;

 

and

 

Inasmuch as the parties agree that the License Agreement contains a provision (Section 4.1) for the acquisition of new, related Improvement Technologies by NewLink arising at MCGRI after the Agreement was signed

 

and

 

Inasmuch as NewLink has reviewed a new Improvement Technology [*], and wishes to exercise its option to incorporate those technologies into the existing License Agreement technology portfolio under its standard royalty terms and use conditions,

 

It is Agreed:

 

That the parties amend the License Agreement relative to its Exhibit A , such that MCG case [*] is to be included in the technology portfolio for development and commercialization by NewLink, effective the date that the License Fee of [*] is received at MCGRI.

 

This present amendment shall hereby be considered part of the original License Agreement and is hereto agreed by representatives of both parties signing below.

 

 

	
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    	
 
    	
 
    	
NEWLINK GENETICS
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By
    	
/s/Betty Aldridge
    	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/Nicholas N. Vahanian
    
	
Name:
    	
Betty Aldridge
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Nicholas N. Vahanian
    
	
Title:
    	
Executive Director
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief Medical and Operations Officer
    
	
Date:
    	
4/27/06
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Date:    4/21/06
#### Charles IRWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-51384.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

DECIDED: May 26, 2004.

Mary Ellen Felps, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Gary Layton Anderson, US Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, Brenda Mae Liess, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Irwin appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of his applications for Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability benefits. He argues that the disability decision was not supported by substantial evidence, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) used improper criteria to assess his credibility, and the ALJ was required to address whether he can maintain gainful work activity.

We hold that the disability determination was supported by substantial evidence. *See Greenspan v. Shalala,*38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir.1994). In so holding, we determine that the record supports the ALJ’s characterization of Irwin’s allegations of disabling pain as not credible, we hold harmless the ALJ’s failure to evaluate the opinion of the physician who treated Irwin for his low back pain, and we conclude that the ALJ adequately incorporated all of Irwin’s disabilities in posing the hypothetical question to the vocational expert. *See Wren v. Sullivan,*925 F.2d 123, 128-29 (5th Cir.1991); *Morris v. Bowen,*864 F.2d 333, 336 (5th Cir.1988); *Boyd v. Apfel,*239 F.3d 698, 707 (5th Cir.2001).

Finally, the evidence did not show that Irwin’s ability to maintain employment would be compromised despite his ability to perform employment as an initial matter, and there is no indication that the ALJ did not understand that an ability to maintain employment is inherent in the definition of residual functional capacity. *See Dunbar v. Barnhart,*330 F.3d 670, 672 (5th Cir.2003). Consequently, the ALJ was not required to make a specific finding with regard to Irwin’s ability to maintain employment. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
STATE of Louisiana v. Patrick David SPEARMAN

NO. 2018-KK-0489

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                        1000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                                   29,340
<SECURITIES>                                            110,515
<RECEIVABLES>                                            41,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                              4,304
<INVENTORY>                                              16,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        205,591
<PP&E>                                                  142,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                           96,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          284,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    57,682
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    214
<OTHER-SE>                                              201,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            284,221
<SALES>                                                  93,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        178,585
<CGS>                                                    39,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            95,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        100,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        1,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (6,669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             12,771
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (19,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (19,440)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.91)



</TABLE>
STATE of Louisiana v. Elijah Matthews ROBINSON

NO. 2017-KO-1241

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
EXHIBIT 32.1   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Nicholas Keating, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. November 7, 2006  /s/ C. NICHOLAS KEATING, JR. 
C. Nicholas Keating, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December
31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





By:/s/ David
Zaikin


David
Zaikin


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)





April 15,
2008