alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ecam_ex103.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


Kishore Mamillapalli


44445 Overland Ave.


 Culver City, CA 90230







October 2, 2011


 


ECampusCash Inc.


44445 Overland Ave.


Culver City, CA 90230


 

 


Re: Funding Commitment







Dear Sirs:







This letter agreement (the “Agreement”) confirms the commitment of the undersigned to arrange for financing for you (the “Company”) in a minimum amount of $200,000 over the twelve month period commencing on the date of this letter (the “Commitment Period.”)







It is the intention of the undersigned to arrange for financing by third parties, either in the form of loans or purchases of equity securities of the Company. However, if the undersigned is unable to arrange for such financing, or if such financing is for less than $200,000, the undersigned will loan the balance to the Company on market terms, when and as required by the Company during the  Commitment Period.







Please indicate your agreement with the above terms by signing below.


 


 



	 	Very truly yours,
	 	/s/ Kishore Mamillapalli
	 	Kishore Mamillapalli





 


eCampusCash Inc.







By: /s/ Kishore Mamillapalli


       Kishore Mamillapalli, President
Terry Lynn BRADY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5076

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6565

DARRICK LAMONTE KING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JUANITA BAKER; MARY HARROP; KAREN PARDUE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-825-5-BR)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 18, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrick Lamonte King, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Darrick Lamonte King appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v.

Baker, No. CA-01-825-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 2, 2004 & entered

Mar. 3, 2004). We deny King’s pending motion for relief. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 11.1

                        Registrant: Raster Graphics, Inc.

                Statement of Computation of Net Income Per Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                        June 30,              June 30,
                                  ------------------    ------------------
                                    1997       1996       1997       1996
                                  -------    -------    -------    -------
<S>                               <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>    

Net income                        $ 1,320    $   680    $ 2,289    $ 1,132
                                  =======    =======    =======    =======

Weighted average common shares
outstanding                         9,392        664      9,338        632
Common equivalent shares from
  convertible preferred stocks       --        5,449       --        5,449

Common equivalent shares from
  stock options and warrants          681        735        777        750

Shares related to SAB Nos. 55,
  64 and 83                          --          802       --          802
                                  -------    -------    -------    -------
Shares used in computing net
  income per share                 10,073      7,650     10,115      7,633
                                  =======    =======    =======    =======

Net income per share              $  0.13    $  0.09    $  0.23    $  0.15
                                  =======    =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>


                                       16
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K
of Pharmasset, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Kurt Leutzinger, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|Date: November 25, 2009                
|                                       
|/s/    KURT
LEUTZINGER                 
|Kurt Leutzinger Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pharmasset, Inc. and will be retained by Pharmasset, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2564 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2564

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain zippered cases of textile 
                materials with textile straps for toys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain zippered cases of textile 
                materials with textile straps for toys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ZIPPERED CASES OF TEXTILE MATERIALS WITH TEXTILE 
              STRAPS FOR TOYS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Zippered cases of   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        textile materials                                                  31/2015.......
                        with textile
                        straps (provided
                        for in subheading
                        4202.92.30) with
                        an internal
                        capacity of 800
                        cc or more but
                        not over 1000 cc,
                        for electronic
                        drawing toys,
                        electronic games
                        or educational
                        toys or devices,
                        and books and
                        other accessories
                        used with those
                        devices..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40078

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN GARZA, also known as Juan Garza-Ibarra, 

also known as Carlos Garza

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CR-377-1

--------------------

October 8, 2001

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan

Garza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garza has

filed a brief, which is construed as a response to counsel’s

motion to withdraw. Garza argues, inter alia, that his counsel

was ineffective for failure to (1) investigate and prepare for

arraignment and sentencing, (2) object to inaccurate information

in the presentence report, and (3) challenge the legalities of
No. 01-40078

-2-

Garza’s two previous illegal entry convictions. The record has

not been adequately developed for us to consider Garza’s

ineffective assistance arguments on direct appeal. See United

States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). Our

independent review of counsel’s brief, Garza’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Victor L. PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2724

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2436 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2436

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cyanuric chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cyanuric chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYANURIC CHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.45 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to cyanuric chloride) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered January 2, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01506
- CV
DALLAS COUNTY HOSPIT AL DISTRICT D/B/A PARKLAND HEALTH & HO SPITAL SYSTEM, Appellant
V. JAMES RODGERS, IV IN DIVIDUALLY , ET AL., Appellee s O n Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 01728 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s December 30, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by February 16, 2 015. We caution appellant that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
DYCK O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. Marilyn WALSH, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-514

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Consolidated Health Care Associates, Inc.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              90,782
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,911,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (655,000)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,615,315
<PP&E>                                           1,314,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                     813,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,798,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,869,308
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,727,305
<COMMON>                                           195,282
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,798,982
<SALES>                                          9,345,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,901,137
<CGS>                                            5,258,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,096,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 207,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (402,484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55,788
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (458,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (458,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.02)
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2





MAXUS
      REALTY TRUST, INC.





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Maxus Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Trust”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John W. Alvey,
      Vice President, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Trust, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of June 30,
      2006 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).








/s/
      John W. Alvey


John
      W.
      Alvey


Vice
      President


Chief
      Financial & Accounting Officer


Date: August 11,
      2006
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00278-CV 

RODNEY ROWLETT APPELLANT

V.

LOCATION PROPERTIES, LTD. APPELLEE 

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2017-003575-1

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

Appellant, who is proceeding pro se, was notified by e-mail on January 9, 

2018, that his brief was due on or before February 8, 2018. On March 8, 2018, 

we notified appellant by e-mail and regular mail2that his brief had not been filed 

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution 

unless appellant filed with the court within ten days an appellant’s brief and a

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2The notice sent by regular mail was returned with the label “VACANT 

UNABLE TO FORWARD.”
2

motion reasonably explaining the failure to file an appellant’s brief and the need 

for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have not 

received any response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief after having been given an 

opportunity to provide a reasonable explanation for the failure, we dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

DELIVERED: April 12, 2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**SHAQUILLE WEST,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 87 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 22nd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
In the MATTER OF the Succession of John Robert BISCAMP

NO. 2017-C-0408

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.
Kenneth MCDONALD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4649

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress. The committee advises NARA on the full range of programs, policies, and plans for the Center for Legislative Archives in the Office of Records Services.

# DATES:

April 27, 2009 from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Congressional Meeting Room South, Capitol Visitor Center.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard H. Hunt, Director; Center for Legislative Archives; (202) 357-5350.

#                     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                          ( print page 17226)    

## Agenda

(1) Chair's opening remarks—Clerk of the House.

(2) Recognition of Co-chair—Secretary of the Senate

(3) Recognition of the Acting Archivist of the United States.

(4) Approval of the minutes of the last meeting.

(5) Discussion of on-going projects and activities.

(6) Activities Report of the Center for Legislative Archives.

(7) Other current issues and new business.

The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: April 8, 2009.

Mary Ann Hadyka,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-8506 Filed 4-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
S. 134 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

An Act 

To require an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of the National Institutes 

of Health pursuant to reports and recommendations made under the National 

Alzheimer’s Project Act. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alzheimer’s Accountability and 

Investment Act’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROJECT. 

Section 2 of the National Alzheimer’s Project Act (42 U.S.C. 

11225) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following: 

‘‘(h) PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT BUDGET.—For fiscal year 2024 

and each subsequent fiscal year, the Director of the National 

Institutes of Health shall prepare and submit, directly to the President for review and transmittal to Congress, after reasonable opportunity for comment, but without change, by the Secretary of Health 

and Human Services and the Advisory Council, an annual budget 

estimate for the initiatives of the National Institutes of Health 

pursuant to the reports and recommendations made under this 

Act, including an estimate of the number and type of personnel 

needs for the National Institutes of Health.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.