alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                      |  |                                           
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                                  |  | Jurisdiction of Organization/Incorporation
|MHI Hospitality, L.P.                 |  | Delaware                                  
|MHI Hospitality TRS, LLC              |  | Delaware                                  
|MHI Hospitality TRS Holding, Inc.     |  | Maryland                                  
|MHI GP LLC                            |  | Delaware                                  
|Laurel Hotel Associates LLC           |  | Maryland                                  
|MHI Laurel West LLC                   |  | Maryland                                  
|Philadelphia Hotel Associates LP      |  | Pennsylvania                              
|Brownestone Partners, LLC             |  | Virginia                                  
|Capitol Hotel Associates L.P., L.L.P. |  | Virginia                                  
|Savannah Hotel Associates LLC         |  | Virginia                                  
|MHI Jacksonville LLC                  |  | Delaware                                  
|MHI Hollywood LLC                     |  | Delaware                                  
|Louisville Hotel Associates, LLC      |  | Delaware
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ricardo Bernandes, in my capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:



the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ending September 30, 2003, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on October 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.



Dated: October 31, 2003



By:

/s/    RICARDO BERNARDESRicardo Bernardes, Chief Financial Officer




20
William Chad WEAVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4781

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Howard MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1963

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

      The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Hometown Community
Bancshares, Inc. (the "small business issuer"), hereby certifies as follows:

      The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer (the
"Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small
business issuer.

      Dated this 31st day of March, 2005.

                                       /s/ C. Sean Childers
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       C. Sean Childers, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and
will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Report of VALLEY HIGH MINING COMPANY (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Michael Coombs, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  VALLEY HIGH MINING COMPANY     Date:March 17, 2008By:/s/John Michael CoombsJohn Michael CoombsChairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer (CEO)  Date:March 17, 2008By:/s/John Michael CoombsJohn Michael CoombsChief or Principal Officer (CFO), and Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary and Tresurer,
Timothy Justin TACY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2729

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0364. ROKEI JERQUINA WINSTON v. THE STATE.

Based on the limited materials before us, it appears that Rokei Jerquina

Winston pleaded guilty to several offenses in 2009.

1

In 2019, he filed a pro se motion

to withdraw his guilty plea. The trial court denied the motion, and Winston filed a

timely application for discretionary review. 

Winston’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea was filed outside the term of

court of hisjudgment of conviction. See Ellison v. State, 283 Ga. 461, 461 (660 SE2d

373) (2008) (noting that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea must be filed in the same

term of court in which the plea was entered and a trial court lacksjurisdiction to grant

an untimely motion). However, orders resolving out-of-time motions to withdraw

guilty pleas have been treated by our Supreme Court as directly appealable. See id.;

Smith v. State, 283 Ga. 376, 376-377 (659 SE2d 380) (2008). Thus, it appearsthat the

trial court’s order is subject to direct appeal.

We will grant an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the

lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly,

this application is hereby GRANTED, and Winston shall have ten daysfrom the date

1

In 2014, Winston filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal, which was denied,

and we dismissed his subsequent appeal as untimely. See Case No. A15A1540 (May

18, 2015).

March 18, 2019
of this order to file his notice of appeal with the trial court. If he has already filed a

notice of appeal in the trial court, he need not file an additional notice. The clerk of

the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the records transmitted

to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/18/2019
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mechel OAO (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                           the accompanying AnnualReport on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                        the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  May 22, 2006 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |   |
|                          | /s/ Vladimir F. Iorich |   |
|                          | Vladimir F. Iorich |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-20236

Summary Calendar

_____________________

CHRISTINE PAIGE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY COCHRAN; CITY OF BAYTOWN,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-978

_________________________________________________________________

April 7, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christine Paige appeals the district court’s grant of judgment

as a matter of law dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against

the City of Baytown. Paige contends that Baytown failed to conduct

an adequate investigation of her complaint that a Baytown police

officer, Gary Cochran, raped her. 

This court reviews a judgment as a matter of law de novo. See

Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 313 (5th Cir. 1997).

Judgment as a matter of law is proper only when “there is no

legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find
2

for that party on that issue.” FED.R.CIV.P. 50(a)(1). The record

is reviewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the

motion. See Burch, 119 F.3d at 313. 

A municipality may be liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for the

actions of non-policymaking employees only if those actions were

taken pursuant to an official policy of the municipality. See

Monell v. Department of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978).

Paige contends, however, that § 1983 provides an independent cause

of action against a municipality for failure to investigate

constitutional misconduct by police officers. We need not reach

this issue. Regardless of whether such a cause of action exists,

and regardless of what standard we might apply in determining what

constitutes an adequate investigation, the district court’s

decision was correct; no reasonable factfinder could have found

that Baytown failed to investigate or that the investigation was so

inadequate as to rise to the level of a constitutional violation.

FED.R.CIV.P. 50(a)(1). Further, there is no evidence of any Baytown

policy to conduct inadequate investigations of alleged

constitutional violations by its personnel. Accordingly, we AFFIRM

the judgment of the district court.

A F F I R M E D.
Oliver RABON v. James SMITHKORS, et al.

NO. 2018-C-0294

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           2,586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,943
<INVENTORY>                                     38,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,733
<OTHER-SE>                                   (173,995)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,508
<SALES>                                         14,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,326
<CGS>                                           11,701
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,780)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,127)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        








</TABLE>
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
# Official Journal L 305/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.305.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 305 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5219 November 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.305.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 305

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5219 November 2009

---

| Contents | | IV   Other acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 14/07/COL of 7 February 2007 amending for the sixty-second time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by replacing the old Chapter 14 with a new Chapter 14 — State aid for research and development and innovation | 1 |

Contents

IV   Other acts

page

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 14/07/COL of 7 February 2007 amending for the sixty-second time, the procedural and substantive rules in the field of State aid by replacing the old Chapter 14 with a new Chapter 14 — State aid for research and development and innovation

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 10.2(B)


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. 1 to Development Services Agreement (the “Amendment”) is dated as of April 1, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), is between ACHAOGEN, INC. (“Achaogen”) and ARK Diagnostics, Inc. (“Ark”) and is issued pursuant to the Development Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated August 19, 2013, by and between Achaogen and Ark who are sometimes hereinafter jointly referred to as the “Parties” to this Amendment.


WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into the Agreement;


WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement as specified herein;


NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:


Section 8(b) Process for Entering Into Commercialization Agreement


|  |                                                                 
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|• | The date of April 1, 2014 shall be extended through July 1, 2014

Other than as amended herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date(s) set forth below and it will be effective as of the day and year first above written.





ACHAOGEN, INC.    ARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC.


By: /s/ Derek Bertocci By: /s/ Johnny Valdez


Name:  Derek Bertocci    Name: Johnny Valdez


Title:  Chief Financial Officer    Title: President & CEO


Date: April 16, 2014 Date: 4/9/2014
!' vA»r~:*-v.5e James Turner To: rebamburg@aol.com 

^i^^t : --Jll_ 08/26/2005 11:11 AM Subje"; Ro^er'sToad Site ICs 

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 

Bob, following up on our phone call concerning the need for Institutional Controls at the Rogers Road Site, 

I have attached a model form that was prepared by the Department of Justice and our Office of General 

Counsel (OGC). Ihave also attached a workup of the model that was used as an exhibit to the recent 

Consent Decree with the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway for the AT&SF Albuquerque Site in New 

Mexico. Both are in Corel WordPerfect 9 and in MS Word. However, I would strongly advise that you use 

WordPerfect if you can, since this was originally a Wordperfect file, and the MS VVord copies are not user 

friendly at all. 

The form is set up for a grant to the United States and the State. That should probably not be the case 

here however. I have spoken with the attorney at OGC who is involved in approving these things, and I 

believe that this one may be set up with the City of Jacksonville as the grantee with possibly a third party 

beneficiary provision that allows the EPA to enforce the restrictions. I am going to get some additional 

language from OGC on the third party beneficiary enforcement. Obviously the circumstances here are 

different that the AT&SF Site matter. The remedial action was completed a long time ago. The Site is in 

O&M, and we are doing the second five year review of the remedy. The site needs to be protected from 

groundwater use and probably disturbance of areas where there is a soil cap in place and groundwater 

monitoring wells. Site access would need to be maintained for groundwater sampling and inspection to 

ensure the intergrity of the cap and any other remedial components, as well as for any necessary 

maintenance or response actions. 

Assuming the City is agreeable to accepting the grant and the grantor will be willing to execute such a , 

document, please take this form and re-work it so that the City is the Grantee and that it fits this situation. 

If you have questions, please call and let's discuss. Once you have prepared a draft, please e-mail it to 

me ASAP to review. In the meantime, I will try to get some third party language from OGC. If we can get 

this resolved, there should be no need for you and I to be involved in the meeting with the Mayor. Thanks 

for your assistance and take care. 

Q 

EasementModel.wpd EasementModel.doc ATSFEasementFinalB2804.wpd ATSFEasementFinal62804.doc 

James L. Turner 

Senior Attorney 

Office of Regional Counsel (6RC-S) 

U.S. EPA Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Ste. 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

E-Mail: Turner.jBmes@epa.gov 

Ph: (214)665-3159 

Fax: (214) 665-6460 9050354 

002234
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,197]

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a Tennessee State AFL-CIO representative on behalf of workers of Republic Doors and Frames, Inc., McKenzie, Tennessee.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

      ( print page 16894)    
Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-8279 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 4.1
Description of the Company’s Common Stock Registered
Under Section 12 of the Exchange Act of 1934
Description of Common Stock
The following summary of eXp World Holdings, Inc.’s Common Stock is based on and qualified by the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) and our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”). For a complete description of the terms and provisions of the Company’s equity securities, including its common stock, refer to the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws, both of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Authorized Capital Shares
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of 900,000,000 shares of Common Stock, all of which are with a par value of $0.00001 per share ("Common Stock”).
Voting Rights
The holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on each matter submitted to a vote of shareholders, including the election of directors. Our Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights.
Dividend Rights
The holders of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled to receive such dividends and other distributions (payable in cash, property, or capital stock of the Corporation) when, as and if declared thereon by the Board of Directors from time to time out of any assets or funds of the Corporation legally available therefor, and shall share equally on a per share basis in such dividends and distributions.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of the Corporation, after payment or provision for payment of the debts and other liabilities of the Corporation, the holders of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled to receive all the remaining assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders, ratably in proportion to the number of shares of Common Stock held by them.
Other Rights and Preferences
Our Common Stock has no preemptive, conversion or exchange rights. Holders of Common Stock may act by unanimous written consent.
Listing
The Common Stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the trading symbol “EXPI.”