alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2593 

To extend the suspension of duty on trifloxysulfuron-sodium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on trifloxysulfuron-sodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIFLOXYSULFURON-SODIUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.32 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 trifloxysulfuron-sodium) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Daniel A. BERNATH, Appellant, v. Don SHIPLEY ; Diane Shipley; Brandi Woolard; and Extreme Seal Experience, LLC ; Mark C. Seavey; and Terrance Hoey, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-5216

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0059

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

RICHARD L. RUTLEDGE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 27 2023

09/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0059
# C ou r t

of A p p e al s

of t h e S t at e of

G e or gi a

A

T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s h e r e b y p a s s e s t h e f o l l o w i n g o r d e r :

A 1 8 A 1 6 4 9

. W

I H L Y H A R P O v

. T H E S T A T E

.

T h i s c a s e w a s d o c k e t e d b y t h i s C o u r t o n A p r i l 2 6

, 2 0 1 8

, a

n d a p p e l l a n t ’ s b r i e f

a n d e n u m e r a t i o n s o f e r

r o r w e r e d

u e M a y 1 6

, 2 0 1 8

. A

s o f t h e d a t e o f t h i s o r d e r

,

a p p e l l a n t s t i l l h a s n o t f i l e d a b r i e f a n d e n u m e r a t i o n s o f e r r o r a n d h a s n o t r e q

u e s t e d a n

e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e i n w h i c h t o d o s o

. A

c c o r d i n g l y

, t h i s a p p e a l i s h e r e b y D I S M I S S E D

a s a b a n d o n e d p u

r s u a n t t o C o u r t o f A p p e a l s R u l e s 1 3 a n d 2 3

.

C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’s O f f i c e

, At l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i

s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f Ap p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w

r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. May 22, 2018

05/22/2018
Exhibit
32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Valley Commerce Bancorp (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Donald A. Gilles, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








March
      18, 2008/s/ Donald A. GillesDonald
      A. GillesPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Amendment No. 1 to Exclusive License Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 AMENDMENT No. 1 to 
 EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT 

MGH Amendment Agreement No: 2006A20644 
 MGH Case No: 1814 
 This Amendment No. 1 (this
“AMENDMENT”), effective as of January 23rd, 2006, (“AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE DATE”), amends the Exclusive License Agreement, MGH Agreement No. 2004A18946, dated May 17th, 2005, and any subsequent amendments (collectively, the
“AGREEMENT”), between The General Hospital Corporation, a not-for-profit corporation d/b/a Massachusetts General Hospital, having a place of business at 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 (“HOSPITAL”) and Juniper Medical, Inc. a
Delaware corporation, having a principal place of business at 7139 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 300, Pleasanton, CA 94566(“COMPANY”). 
 The parties have entered into the AGREEMENT and now wish to amend it as set forth below. 
 For good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows. 
  

	 	1.	Supplement Article 1, entitled “CERTAIN DEFINITIONS” by inserting the following new provision: 


1.27 “DISTRIBUTION 510(k) or PMA APPLICATION” shall mean a 510(k) or PMA APPLICATION that is filed by the COMPANY with the
United States Food and Drug Administration with the intent to make available for distribution a PRODUCT in the United States. For purposes of this Section 1.27, manufacturing scale-up of a PRODUCT for distribution shall be deemed as
“intent to make available for distribution a PRODUCT”. 
  

	 	4.	Amend Article 4.4 (a) by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 


4.4 (a) Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000.00) within thirty (30) days of the earlier of (i) submission of a protocol
for the first pivotal clinical trial under an IDE or (ii) first DISTRIBUTION 510(k) or PMA APPLICATION for a PRODUCT or PROCESS. 
 Except as specifically modified in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 The parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE DATE. 
  

									
		 	        COMPANY	 		 		 	       HOSPITAL
					
	BY:	 	   /s/ Mitchell Levinson
	 		 	BY:	 	        /s/ Irina Erenburg, Ph.D.

		 		 		 		 	        Irina Erenburg, Ph.D.
        Associate Director



									
	TITLE:	 	   President
	 		 	TITLE:	 	   Corporate Sponsored Research and Licensing

					
	DATE:	 	   1-25-06
	 		 	DATE:	 	   1-25-06
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidKirwan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 15,  2004 | /s/   DAVID  KIRWAN         |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | David Kirwan*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FischerImaging Corporation and will be retained by Fischer Imaging Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
                               CREDIT CORPORATION

                              Michael J. Gillespie
                               Accounting Director

                              Officer's Certificate

Pursuant to the Servicing Agreement between Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Credit
Corporation, formerly known as NOVUS Financial Corporation, as seller and
servicer (referred to herein in such capacity as the "Servicer"), and Sequoia
Mortgage Trust 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12; 2003-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; 2004-1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, the undersigned, hereby states that:

      (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance
under the Servicing Agreement during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004
has been made under my supervision; and

      (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

                                        MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER
                                        CREDIT CORPORATION

                                          By /s/ Douglas J. Bush
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                Douglas J. Bush

                                          Title Director

                                          Dated as of December 31, 2004

                                          By /s/ David Bianucci
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                David Bianucci

                                          Title Vice President

                                          Dated as of December 31, 2004

   2500 Lake Cook Road, 1 East, Riverwoods, Illinois 60015 Tel (224) 405-1903

CertSequoiaMortTrust6-12;2003:2004
Dae'Quain COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2526

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ricardo Bernandes, in my capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:



the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ending June 30, 2004, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on July 26, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such
quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.



Dated: July 26, 2004



By:

/s/ Ricardo BernardesRicardo Bernardes,Executive Vice President,Finance and Chief Financial Officer
OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0332 M. King (1)

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:30PM -----

To: "Higgins,Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/14/2010 09:47PM 

cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael 

Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: Re: Clarifying questions on RICE

Hi Cortney, 

Regarding the spreadsheet you sent – typically when we are evaluating MACT or GACT for a 

control technology, we do not include costs for recordkeeping and reporting in the analysis. 

We would only look at the annual cost associated with the control device, including the 

operation and maintenance cost and the annualized capital cost. So we would not do our 

analysis the same as the way you’ve done it in your attached spreadsheet.

On the reporting costs, one thing to keep in mind is that 80 percent of those costs are initial 

costs for reading instructions, training personnel, and the initial testing and compliance 

notifications. So those are one-time costs that would only be incurred in the first year. We 

have tried to minimize the burden of the reporting costs as much as possible, however we do 

need some reporting so that we can ensure sources are complying with the rule, and we feel 

that semiannual compliance reports are appropriate and not overly burdensome. Note that 

we do not require reporting for emergency engines and for engines <100 HP at major 

sources and <300 HP at area sources. 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov

-----"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> wrote: -----

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

Date: 02/12/2010 06:31PM 

cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: Clarifying questions on RICE

Hi Melanie,

Attached you'll find a spreadsheet of the costs and benefits for area source engines between 

300 and 500 HP. The attached analysis shows that requiring controls for these engines, if 

they run less than ~100 hrs per year, is not cost-beneficial (costs of controls exceed the 

PM2.5 benefits). Do you know how many engines in this group run less than 100 hours per 

year and are not emergency engines? 

Additionally, for these sized engines running 100 hours, the estimate of reporting costs is 1/3 

of the total annual costs. Given that these engines will have control devices installed, and 

emissions reductions will be achieved, is there any flexibility to ease the reporting 

requirements? Furthermore, is there any flexibility in lessening in the reporting requirements 

for the area source engines subject to emissions limits (and thus technology controls)?

Page 1
OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0332 M. King (1)

Thanks,

Cortney

[attachment "Engine_hours_CBA_OMB.xls" removed by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US]

Page 2
Lorraine FROLE, Appellant, v. COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2692

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Masakazu Kurushima, in my capacity as the President and Chief Executive Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending March 31, 2008, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on April 25, 2008 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained
in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.

Dated: April 25, 2008



By:

/s/ MASAKAZU KURUSHIMAMasakazu KurushimaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely  for  the  purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned  Acting  Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"),  hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form  10-QSB of  the  Company  for  the  quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Report")  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act  of  1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.


Date: February 21, 2007                 /s/ Tami J. Story
                                        --------------------
                                        Tami J. Story
                                        Acting Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth R. BUCKINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1420

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
B.P. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2150676

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 13, 2017 Reh. denied March 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION 

I, M. H. Mcilvain, CFO, certifythat: 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Golden Chief Resources, Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make          the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements          were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly          report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and          procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the          registrant and we have: 

    a)                 designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others          within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly          report is being prepared; 

    b)                 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this report based on such evaluation; and 

    c)                 disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to          materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial          reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over          financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee          of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent          function): 

    a)                 all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

    b)                 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting. 

Date: June 24, 2004 

By:/s/ M. H. Mcilvain
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
 SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of the firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firms' workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification of Eligibility To Apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance
[01/08/2018 through 01/15/2018]
Firm name
Firm address
Date
                             accepted for 
                             investigation
Product(s)Casco Bay Molding, Ltd
32 Smada Drive, Sanford, ME 04073
01/11/2018
The firm manufactures products made of thermoplastic and liquid silicone using injection molds.Arcadian Services, LLC
3109 Northington Court, Florence, AL 35630
01/11/2018
The firm manufactures car and truck wash chemicals.
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. These petitions are received pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Irette Patterson, Program Analyst.


[FR Doc. 2018-01239 Filed 1-23-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P