alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7689

TONY SHULER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden, ACI; SOUTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-99-1868-3-24BC)

Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Shuler, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Shuler seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000), and denying his motion to reconsider. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Shuler

v. Miro, No. CA-99-1868-3-24BC (D.S.C. filed Sept. 7, 2000; entered

Sept. 8, 2000, & filed Oct. 30, 2000; entered Oct. 31, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of SFSB, Inc. (the
“Company”) each certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, that the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





/s/Philip
      E. LoganPhilip
      E. LoganChairman,
      President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
      26, 2009





/s/ Sophie Torin WittelsbergerSophie
      Torin WittelsbergerVice President and Chief Financial
  OfficerMarch
      26, 2009





This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is
not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document,
and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other
than as specifically required by law.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,020] 

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 29, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a California State Workforce Office representative on behalf of workers of Asteel Flash, Inc., Fremont, California. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

      ( print page 15761)    
Signed in Washington, DC, this 20th day of March 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-7737 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 March 15, 2005 The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street, 12 East
New York, New York 10286
Attention: Corporate Trust Trustee Administrators Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, National Association
500 Stanton Christiana Rd., 3rd Floor/DPS4
Newark, Delaware 19713
Attention: Institutional Trust Services Re:
    
    Superior Wholesale Inventory Financing Trust X (Issuer)Annual Statement as to
Compliance
 Ladies and Gentlemen: Reference is made to
Section 3.9 of the Trust Indenture dated as of September 16, 2004 between the
Issuer, The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee, and General Motors Acceptance Corporation, as
Servicer (the Indenture) and Section 4.1 of the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
September 16, 2004 between the Issuer, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, as Servicer, and
Wholesale Auto Receivables Corporation, as Seller (the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement). The undersigned does hereby certify that: a.
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of September 16, 2004 through
December 31, 2004, and of its performance under the Indenture, the Trust Sale and Servicing
Agreement, and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, andb.
    
    To his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Indenture, the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement, and the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such period.
  Very truly yours,/s/ J. B. Van Orman, Jr.Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officerof GMAC North American Operations
EXHIBIT 13.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Keith Diakiw, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies that pursuant to the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 30, 2012





By:              /s/ Keith Diakiw


Name:            Keith Diakiw


Title:              Director, Chairman, President and Chief Executive and Operating Officer and Secretary


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Montrail JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Veronica TENZER, as Natural Parent and Guardian of the Property of H.T., a minor, as Interested Person, and sole child and heir of the Ward, Appellant, v. In re: GUARDIANSHIP OF Stephen Michael TENZER, Appellee.

No. 4D17-81

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 21, 2018]

Aaron V. Johnson of Collins, Brown, Barkett, Garavaglia & Lawn, Chartered, Vero Beach, for appellant.

Vincent E. Schindeler of Vincent E. Schindeler, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Veronica Tenzer, as natural parent and guardian of the property of her son, H.T., appeals a November 2016 final order approving a trust set up on behalf of her former husband. Appellant argues she was denied due process because she was not permitted to participate in the hearing seeking approval of the trust. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The record reflects that in September 2016, the circuit court entered an order striking Appellant from the trust proceeding because she was not an interested party. Appellant failed to timely appeal that order. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(h), (k) (2016). The September order striking Appellant as a party to the original trust proceeding was a final order because it *755removed Appellant from the action pertaining to the establishment of the trust. *See, e.g.* , *Quinones v. Se. Inv. Grp. Corp.* , 138 So.3d 549, 549 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; *Superior Fence & Rail of N. Fla. v. Lucas* , 35 So.3d 104, 105 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (en banc); *Brogdon v. Guardianship of Brogdon* , 553 So.2d 299, 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Appellant's failure to appeal the September final order is a bar to any subsequent attempt to have us address whether she was an interested party to the original proceeding and, therefore, entitled to due process. Accordingly, we dismiss her appeal.

*Dismissed.*

Damoorgian, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
TRUSTBIZ, LLC as Trustee, Under the 16-415 Land Trust, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; Timothy W. McClellan; Geri A. McClellan; and Valrico Heights Estates Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-3517

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
At Petitioners' request, EPA hosted a listen session on July 29, 2013 during which Petitioners discussed

their Petition to Add the Oil and Gas Extraction Industry, Standard Industrial Classification Code 13, to the List of Facilities Required to Report under the Toxics Release Inventory. Petitioners created the attached agenda and adhered to its framework and content during the listening session. Since this was a listening session, EPA listened to Petitioners’ input but did not provide substantive feedba ck or input of any kind.

Meeting Attendees:
EPA Steve Knizner, Director, TRI Program Division (knizner.steve@epa.gov) Ingrid Rosencrantz, Branch Chief, TRI Regulatory Development Branch (rosencrantz.ingrid@epa.gov) Gilbert Mears, Staff, TRI (mears.gilbert@epa.gov) Cory Wagner, Staff, TRI (wagner.cory@epa.gov) Chris Kaczmarek, Attorney, Office of General Counsel (kaczmarek.chris@epa.gov) Ben Wakefield, Attorney, Office of General Counsel (wakefield.benjamin@epa.gov)

Non

- EPA Eric Schaeffer, Executive Direc tor, Environmental Integrity Project (eschaeffer@environmentalintegrity.org) Adam Kron, Attorney, Environmental Integrity Project (akron@environmentalintegrity.org) Sofia Plagakis, Policy Analyst, Center for Effective Government (formerly OMB Watch) (splag akis@foreffectivegov.org) Sean Moulton, Director of Open Government Policy Program , Center for Effective Government (smoulton@foreffectivegov.org) Diana Dascalu

- Joffe, Senior General Counsel, Chesapeake Climate Action Network (diana@chesapeakeclimate.org) Aaron Mintzes, Policy Advocate, Earthworks (amintzes@earthworksaction.org) Matthew McFeeley, Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council (mmcfeeley@nrdc.org) Craig Segall, Sierra Club, Attorney (Craig.Segall@sierraclub.org)Ryan Hamilton, Intern, Environm ental Integrity Project

Ariel Solaski, Intern, Environmental Integrity Project Caitlin Stantion, Intern, Environmental Integrity Project
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 68 (Friday, April 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ID-6008-000; ID-6009-000; ID-6010-000; ID-6011-000]


Myers, Max J.; Perkins, Jr., Melvin H.; Brockman, Carla D.; 
Forbes, Scott H.; Notice of Filing

April 3, 2009.
    Take notice that on April 1, 2009, the above applicants, submitted 
an information report of interlocking public utility positions that 
will be automatically authorized under section 305(b) of the Federal 
Power Act, and 18 CFR 45.9 of the Federal Energy Regulator Commission's 
regulations.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible On-Line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94d2d1c6d7dbfaf8fdfaf1c7e1e4e4fbe6e0d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8164 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2571 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics’ work gloves. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics’ work 

gloves. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MECHANICS’ WORK GLOVES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking heading 9902.14.03; and 

8 (2) by inserting in numerical sequence the fol9 lowing new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2571 IS

‘‘ 9902.14.03 Mechanics’ work gloves, 

valued over $3.65 per pair 

but not over $5.58 per pair 

(provided for in subheading 6216.00.58) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) AMENDMENT TO U.S. NOTE.—Subchapter II of 

2 chapter 99 is amended by striking the first U.S. Note 18 

3 to such subchapter and inserting after U.S. Note 19 the 

4 following new U.S. Note: 

5 ‘‘20. For purposes of heading 9902.14.03, the term 

6 ‘mechanics’ work gloves’ means gloves having the fol7 lowing characteristics: imitation leather palms and fingers 

8 with fourchettes; backs comprising either one layer of syn9 thetic knitted fabric or three layers with the outer layer 

10 of synthetic knitted fabric, the center layer of foam and 

11 the inner layer of tricot fabric.’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

14 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Jeffrey JENNINGS, Appellant, v. ROGERS BLUE JAYS BASEBALL PARTNERSHIP and Ace American Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 1D17-2201

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$10,000	October 4, 2011


 


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, Queensridge Mining Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (“Maker”) hereby promises
to pay to the order of The Stromer Family, PKS Trust (“Holder”) the sum of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000). This Note
shall bear interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum. All principal and interest due hereunder shall be paid on or before
October 4, 2013.


 


Maker hereby waives presentment, dishonor, notice of dishonor and
protest. All parties hereto consent to, and Holder is expressly authorized to make, without notice, any and all renewals, extensions,
modifications, or waivers of the time for or the terms of payment of any sum or sums due hereunder, or under any documents or instruments
relating to or securing this Note, or of the performance of any covenants, conditions or agreements hereof or thereof or the taking
or release of collateral securing this Note. Any such action by Holder shall not discharge the liability of any party to this Note.


 


This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Nevada without regard to conflict of law principles. Maker shall also pay Holder any and all costs of
collection incurred in connection with this Note, including court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.


 


Queensridge Mining Resources, Inc.


 


By: /s/ Phillip Stromer


Phillip Stromer, President and CEO
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Curatech Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Lincoln
        M. Dastrup, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/
        Lincoln M.
        Dastrup
 Lincoln
        M. Dastrup
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 September
        11, 2008
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has
        been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
        certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant
        to
        section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code )
        and is
        not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure
        document.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Health Services, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc
      R.
      Briggs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Marc R. Briggs


Marc
      R.
      Briggs


Chief
      Financial Officer


July
      31,
      2007
Panel rehearing granted by order filed 4/27/99;

opinion filed 10/5/98 was vacated.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEPHEN AUSTIN PILLARS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-92-85-R, CA-96-137-R)

Submitted: March 23, 1999 Decided: April 27, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Austin Pillars, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge

Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Pillars, Nos. CR-92-85-R; CA-96-137-R

(W.D. Va. Dec. 17, 1997. See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320,

(1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED