alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Housing Programs Limited;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 7, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of National Partnership Investments Corp., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,181,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,130
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,297,217
<PP&E>                                      55,447,343
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,162,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,653,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,245,491
<BONDS>                                      8,302,610
<COMMON>                                       178,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,577,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,653,140
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,573,421
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,282,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (18,667)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             584,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,725,198
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,229,315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,495,883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,495,883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14 
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 134 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 134

    To require an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of the 
 National Institutes of Health pursuant to reports and recommendations 
            made under the National Alzheimer's Project Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2023

  Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Markey, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
 Moran, Mr. Menendez, Ms. Murkowski, and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of the 
 National Institutes of Health pursuant to reports and recommendations 
            made under the National Alzheimer's Project Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alzheimer's Accountability and 
Investment Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROJECT.

    Section 2 of the National Alzheimer's Project Act (42 U.S.C. 11225) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Professional Judgment Budget.--For fiscal year 2024 and each 
subsequent fiscal year, the Director of the National Institutes of 
Health shall prepare and submit, directly to the President for review 
and transmittal to Congress, after reasonable opportunity for comment, 
but without change, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and 
the Advisory Council, an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of 
the National Institutes of Health pursuant to the reports and 
recommendations made under this Act, including an estimate of the 
number and type of personnel needs for the National Institutes of 
Health.''.
                                 <all>
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Edwin King, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J.), rendered October 24, 2014, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the second degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J.), rendered October 24, 2014, affirmed.</p><p>Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders</i>, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: June 09, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




---



##### 



/s/ Claire S. Bean
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2492 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2492

         To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium thiocyanate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Brown of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium thiocyanate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM THIOCYANATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Sodium thiocyanate  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (CAS No. 540-72-                                                   31/2015.......
                        7) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2842.90.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11686 and #11687]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1828-DR), dated 03/05/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe Winter Storm.                    

*Incident Period:*                         01/26/2009 through 01/28/2009.                    

*Effective Date:*                         04/06/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/04/2009.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/05/2009.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Indiana, dated 03/05/2009, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties:

Jennings, Lawrence, Ohio, Posey, Ripley, Scott.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-8518 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 1 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00786

- CR

ENQU ZELEKE , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1353854

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of a
controlled substance and sentenced to confinement for two years in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice on March 26, 2013 . No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until August 9, 2013

.2

A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for ne w trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State
, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not ti mely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.
Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel co nsists of Justices Chief Justice Frost and Justices McCally and Busby. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION(Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, Larry C. Oldham, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofParallel Petroleum Corporation (“Parallel”), hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Parallel for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the periodic reportingrequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained inthat Form 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Parallel.Date: May 5, 2008                          /s/ Larry C. Oldham   Larry C. Oldham,   President and Chief Executive Officer        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel Petroleum Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CITY COUNCIL 

Doug Cox- Mayor 

tbc:~ 

CITY OF IMPERIAL 

Rick Breland - Mayor Pro - Tem 

Geoff Dale- Council Member 

Mark Gran- Council Member 

Betty Sampson- Council Member 

CITY CLERK 

Debra Jackson 

CITYTREASURER 

Stacey Cox 

October 25, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Essential Air Service Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

INCORPORATED 1904 

.,·_,; . .:. ...., :,j ·- 1 

CITY HALL 

420 South Imperial Avenue 

Imperial, California 92251 

City Hall (760) 355-4371 

Fax (760) 355-4718 

http:/ /www.imperial.ca.gov 

CITY ATIORNEY 

Dennis Morita 

Dennis H. Morita A.P.C. 

The City of Imperial has reviewed the proposals submitted to the Department of Transportation's Order 

2012-8-18 related to Essential Air Services at Imperial County Airport near El Centro, California. This 

airport is located entirely within the City of Imperial and affects our economy, traffic circulation, land 

use planning, and costs for support services. The City appreciates the opportunity to comment on such 

an important influence generator for our community. 

After reviewing the proposals provided, the City supports the Seaport Airlines Option #3 proposal with 

services to San Diego and Burbank via a Cessna Caravan. This proposal offers a broad level of flight 

service that connects to national and international destinations with a high level of flexibility and 

frequency at a subsidy in year 2 of approximately $2.264 million. 

Citizens in the City of Imperial and our surrounding area need quality air service to participate in and 

encourage our local economy. Air service connects our people to family members far away, local 

representatives to hubs of business and government, and travel destinations around the globe. 

The City encourages the Department of Transportation to complete its review and analysis process and 

fund essential air services to our area. We look forward to providing any additional comments that you 

may desire. Please contact City Manager Marlene Best for any further details or questions at (760)355-

4373. We thank you once again for the opportunity to comment. 

Douglas A Cox, 

Mayor
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NINA SOLONENKO,

Appellant,

v.

VOGUE PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-722

[February 1, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barbara A. McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE14-

019075(21).

Andrey Solonenko, Esq., Miramar, for appellant.

Gerald Schilian of Schilian & Watarz, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 108 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 58
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 108

                          [Report No. 118-19]

To require a guidance clarity statement on certain agency guidance, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2023

Mr. Lankford (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Risch, and Mr. 
Braun) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
     to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

                              May 9, 2023

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a guidance clarity statement on certain agency guidance, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guidance Clarity Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. GUIDANCE CLARITY STATEMENT REQUIRED.

    (a) Requirement.--Each agency, as defined in section 551 of title 
5, United States Code, shall include a guidance clarity statement as 
described in subsection (b) on any guidance issued by that agency under 
section 553(b)(3)(A) of title 5, United States Code, on and after the 
date that is 30 days after the date on which the Director of the Office 
of Management and Budget issues the guidance required under subsection 
(c).
    (b) Guidance Clarity Statement.--A guidance clarity statement 
required under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) be displayed prominently on the first page of the 
        document; and
            (2) include the following: ``The contents of this document 
        do not have the force and effect of law and do not, of 
        themselves, bind the public or the agency. This document is 
        intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding 
        existing requirements under the law or agency policies.''.
    (c) OMB Guidance.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget shall issue guidance to implement this Act.
                                                        Calendar No. 58

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 108

                          [Report No. 118-19]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To require a guidance clarity statement on certain agency guidance, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 9, 2023

                       Reported without amendment
```