alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Curatech Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Lincoln
        M. Dastrup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Lincoln M. DastrupLincoln
                  M. Dastrup
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
                September
                  13, 2007
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has
        been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
        certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant
        to
        section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
        filed
        as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure
        document.
EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598-DRAFT-0809

SGE00739.A01 Insert page

File sent on CD
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars               
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998         
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998   
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1   
<CASH>                                4,773   
<SECURITIES>                              0    
<RECEIVABLES>                     2,272,353   
<ALLOWANCES>                          4,784        
<INVENTORY>                       4,638,434   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  6,979,075   
<PP&E>                            6,764,458   
<DEPRECIATION>                    1,625,866   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   12,141,295   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             4,943,298   
<BONDS>                           1,971,014   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0   
<PREFERRED>                               0   
<COMMON>                             28,386   
<OTHER-SE>                        3,420,226   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     12,141,295   
<SALES>                          12,810,906   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 12,955,019   
<CGS>                            10,055,376   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    11,734,000   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    410,693   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  407,060   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     810,326   
<INCOME-TAX>                        283,614   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 526,712   
<DISCONTINUED>                            0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0   
<CHANGES>                                 0   
<NET-INCOME>                        526,712   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.186   
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.183       
        



</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 133/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 133 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6617 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 133

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6617 May 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/966 of 15 May 2023 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 to reflect the amendments adopted at the 19th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/967 of 16 May 2023 laying down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from 31 March 2023 until 29 June 2023 in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (
  1
  ) | 125 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/968 of 16 May 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain heavy plate of non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 214 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/966 of 15 May 2023 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 to reflect the amendments adopted at the 19th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/967 of 16 May 2023 laying down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from 31 March 2023 until 29 June 2023 in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (
  1
  )

1

125

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/968 of 16 May 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain heavy plate of non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

214

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 10.42 

Compensatory Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors 

Each director who is not an employee of LifelineSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) receives (i) an annual retainer of $12,000, (ii) a fee equal to $1,000 for each Board meeting that the non-employee director attends (either in person or by telephone) and (iii) $500 for eachCommittee meeting that the non-employee director attends (either in person or by telephone), although no additional fee is paid for attendance at a Committee meeting that is on the same day as a Board meeting. The Chairman of the Board also receivesan annual fee of $12,500 and the Chairmen of the Audit and Compensation Committees each receive an annual fee of $3,500. 

In addition, theCompany’s 2000 Stock Incentive Plan provides that, on the sixth business day of each calendar year, each non-employee director will receive a stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair marketvalue of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. Such options vest in sixteen equal quarterly installments beginning on the three-month anniversary of the date of grant. 

The Company also reimburses its non-employee directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board or Committee meetings.
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Proposed Site*** May 2013 

BECK’S LAKE South Bend, Indiana

St. Joseph County

 Site Location:

The Beck’s Lake site consists of an area of contaminated soil located at the intersection of Washington and Falcon 

Streets on the northwest side of South Bend, Indiana, and adjacent to LaSalle Park. 

 Site History:

The property now known as Beck’s Lake/LaSalle Park in South Bend, Indiana was once used as a dump and landfill. 

Numerous companies and individuals, including Bendix Corporation, reportedly dumped a v ariety of materials 

containing hazardous substances at this location. Historical aerial photos indicate that dumping occurred for more than

40 years at the site ending in the mid 1950s. From the 1950s to the present this area has been turned into a park and 

some residential housing by the City of South Bend. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Potential waste materials dumped at the site included, but were not limited to: asbestos, plating wastes, solvents, paint 

wastes, oils and sludges, and foundry sand. Foundry sand and hydroxide sludge contained arsenic. High levels of 

arsenic have been found in the park and neighborhood surface soils. Other metals found with elevated levels (lead and 

cadmium) have also been detected in park surface soils. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

Exposure to arsenic in residential soils is the main concern for the Beck’s Lake site. 

 Response Activities (to date):

There have been no response activities. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

NPL listing will allow the EPA to address soil contamination on residential properties surrounding the site, allow for 

proper and timely investigation of the nature and extent of the contamination and enable the EPA to determine cleanup 

alternatives. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at this time. The EPA 

received a letter of support for placing the Beck’s Lake site on the NPL from the state of Indiana. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent 

FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to 

these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on 

the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
Marquise Cordero HAYNES a/k/a Marquise Cordero Lumpkin, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3941

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         679,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,148,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,987,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,691,797
<PP&E>                                       3,941,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,940,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,981,557
<BONDS>                                      1,899,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,716
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,940,602
<SALES>                                      3,647,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,227,786
<CGS>                                        2,281,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,419,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               124,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                683,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            683,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   683,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. ENVIRON CONDOMINIUM II ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D17-353

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Conrad R. Huss, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  March 22, 2013  By: /s/Conrad R. Huss Name: Conrad R. Huss Title: Director, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2527 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2527

            To suspend temporarily the duty on triflic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2012

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on triflic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIFLIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Triflic acid (CAS   Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          No. 1493-13-6)                                                    12/31/2015
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2904.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Fw: NO2/NOx In-Stack-Ratio Documentation and Test Results for Pio Pico

----- Forwarded by Cleveland Holladay/R9/USEPA/US on 03/23/2012 09:07 AM -----

From: Cleveland Holladay/R9/USEPA/US

To: Steve Hill <SHill@sierraresearch.com>

Cc: Shirley Rivera/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/22/2012 06:36 PM

Subject: NO2/NOx In-Stack-Ratio Documentation and Test Results for Pio Pico

Steve,

As I agreed to do in the March 8, 2012 meeting, I called Steve Moore of the San Diego Air Pollution 

Control District this afternoon about the NO2/NOx in-stack-ratio documentation that was provided to Pio 

Pico by the district. Based on that call, I am requesting the following information which needs to be 

provided by the applicant for our administrative record for this project.

1: Pio Pico has selected an in-stack NO2/NOx ratio for its three combustion turbines as

follows: equal to 0.13 for normal operations and equal to 0.24 for startup operations. Pio

Pico stated that the ratios were derived from source test data for four natural-gas-fired

LM6000PC Sprint turbines (equipped with water injection, SCR, and oxidation catalysts)

and eleven natural-gas-fired GE Frame 5 turbines (with water injection but no other NOx 

controls and no oxidation catalyst). EPA needs to confirm the proposed ratios for use in the

1-hour NO2 NAAQS air quality modeling.

Specific information regarding the four LM6000 PC Sprint turbines and eleven GE Frame 5 

turbines has not been provided. The applicant should provide the source test data that it 

has relied upon to justify the 0.13 and 0.24 ratios. This should include, at a minimum:

l source test results,

l source test support information to confirm test conditions and equipment operations,

and 

l the source test methodology.

The applicant should confirm if the source test data relied upon is a result of emissions 

compliance testing or a result of other circumstances (such as CEMs info which may have 

been used formally or informally to determine the ratios). Based on this information, the 

applicant should provide a discussion that demonstrates the representativeness and 

comparability of this information for its selection of the proposed ratios for normal and 

startup operations for the proposed project.

2: In addition, source test information (similar to the format requested above) for the

following six emission units (with their NO2/NOx ratios) (below):

Calpeak Border
Unit 1 0.1

Larkspur 1 and 2

Larkspur 1 0.1

Larkspur 2 0.1

Otay Mesa

Turbine 1 0.05

Turbine 2 0.05

Donovan Detention Center

Solar Turbine 0.10 

identified in the air quality modeling input files and the application (Table 4-27, p. PSD - 

4.47) should be provided for similar reasons. 

Thank you, 

Cleve Holladay

Phone 415-947-4140

U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Quality Analysis Office (AIR-7) | 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105
Jorge Antonio HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1686

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Andrew Allen ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2094

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
ACCEPTED 01-15-00045-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/28/2015 2:13:41 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1180 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-CE-014-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date