alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 
   1.
    
    This Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in this Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of JMG Exploration, Inc. for the periods
presented therein.
  /s/ Joanne R, FinnertyJoanne R. FinnertyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
v237484_ex10-8 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TX02-1-002]


Pinnacle West Capital Corporation; Notice of Filing

April 7, 2009.
    Take notice that on March 27, 2009, Electrical District 3 of Pinal 
County, State of Arizona filed additional information to its 
application filed with the Commission on July 15, 2008, in compliance 
with the Commission's March 2, 2009 letter order.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94d2d1c6d7dbfaf8fdfaf1c7e1e4e4fbe6e0d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 17, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-8549 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal L 299/2011

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.299.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 299 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5417 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.299.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 299

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5417 November 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1170/2011 of 16 November 2011 refusing to authorise certain health claims made on foods and referring to the reduction of disease risk (1) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1171/2011 of 16 November 2011 refusing to authorise certain health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (1) | 4 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1172/2011 of 16 November 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 7 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2011/745/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 11 November 2011 amending Decisions 2010/2/EU and 2011/278/EU as regards the sectors and subsectors which are deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage
  (notified under document C(2011) 8017)

   (1) | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1170/2011 of 16 November 2011 refusing to authorise certain health claims made on foods and referring to the reduction of disease risk (1)

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1171/2011 of 16 November 2011 refusing to authorise certain health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (1)

4

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1172/2011 of 16 November 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

7

DECISIONS

2011/745/EU

*

Commission Decision of 11 November 2011 amending Decisions 2010/2/EU and 2011/278/EU as regards the sectors and subsectors which are deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage
  (notified under document C(2011) 8017)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 8017)

9

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2568 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics’ work gloves. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mechanics’ work 

gloves. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MECHANICS’ WORK GLOVES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking heading 9902.14.05; and 

8 (2) by inserting in numerical sequence the fol9 lowing new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2568 IS

‘‘ 9902.14.05 Mechanics’ work gloves, 

valued over $7.22 per pair 

(provided for in subheading 6216.00.58) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) AMENDMENT TO U.S. NOTE.—Subchapter II of 

2 chapter 99 is amended by striking the first U.S. Note 18 

3 to such subchapter and inserting after U.S. Note 19 the 

4 following new U.S. Note: 

5 ‘‘20. For purposes of heading 9902.14.05, the term 

6 ‘mechanics’ work gloves’ means gloves having the fol7 lowing characteristics: imitation leather palms and fingers 

8 with fourchettes; backs comprising either one layer of syn9 thetic knitted fabric or three layers with the outer layer 

10 of synthetic knitted fabric, the center layer of foam and 

11 the inner layer of tricot fabric.’’. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

14 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1161 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to reauthorize the voluntary public 

access and habitat incentive program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. BENNET, and Mr. MARSHALL) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to reauthorize 

the voluntary public access and habitat incentive program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voluntary Public Ac5 cess Improvement Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY PUBLIC ACCESS AND HABITAT INCEN7 TIVE PROGRAM. 

8 Section 1240R(f)(1) of the Food Security Act of 

9 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839bb–5(f)(1)) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘2018,’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1161 IS

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and $150,000,000 for the 

2 period of fiscal years 2024 through 2028’’ before the 

3 period at the end. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of A ppeals
Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

June 24, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________
No. 04-70029

_____________________

JUSTIN WILEY DICKENS,

Petitioner - Appellant

v.

DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent - Appellee

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas (2:00-CV-0110-J)

---------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Petitioner-Appellant Justin Wiley Dickens seeks a

certificate of appealability (“COA”) on three issues that the

district court deemed unworthy of collateral review. Dickens

s eeks a COA from this Court on three claims, all of which

challenge his death sentence. Dickens first argues that the

evidence at the punishment phase of trial was legally

insufficient to prove beyond a reasonabl e doubt that he would1 —— U.S. ——, 125 S. Ct. 1183 (2005).

2 commit criminal acts of violence in the future so as to

constitute a continuing threat to society. Dickens also argues

that his state trial, appeal, and habeas counsel were ineffective

because they failed to invoke the International Covenant on Civil

and Political Rights, an international treaty ratified by the

United State s Senate which prohibits the execution of offenders

for crimes committed when the offender was under the age of 18.

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent

decision in Roper v. Simmons

, 1 Texas Governor Rick Perry has

commuted Di ckens’s death sentence to life imprisonment. As

Dickens petition for a COA challenges only his death sentence,

and not his underlying conviction, his petition is now moot

because Governor Perry has granted him the relief that he

requested.

PETITION DISMISSED.
Ashley MCGEE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Grady C. JUDD, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied as moot.
STATE of Louisiana v. Arizona BATISTE

No. 2017-KP-0515

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. JOHN**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Relator also fails to show the state withheld material exculpatory evidence in violation of *Brady v. Maryland* , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of *911the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 12 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 12

   To prohibit the government of the District of Columbia from using 
 Federal funds to allow individuals who are not citizens of the United 
        States to vote in any election, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 23 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Daines, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Vance, Mr. 
Kennedy, and Mr. Hawley) introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the government of the District of Columbia from using 
 Federal funds to allow individuals who are not citizens of the United 
        States to vote in any election, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds made available to the District of Columbia may be used to 
allow individuals who are not citizens of the United States to vote in 
any election.
    (b) Certification.--Upon application for, approval for, or receipt 
of any Federal funds, the government of the District of Columbia shall 
certify that the government does not permit individuals who are not 
citizens of the United States to vote in any election.
    (c) Application.--The requirements under this section shall apply 
with respect to any Federal funds applied for, approved for, received 
by, or made available to the District of Columbia on or after the date 
on which this bill is introduced in the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
STATE EX REL. Marlon J. BANKS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0248

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has *916exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
# Official Journal C 93A/28 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 93A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6528 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 93A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6528 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 93 A/01 | Notice amending Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Member of the Board and Director of Resolution Planning and Decisions – COM/2022/20072 ( OJ C 43 A, 28.1.2022 ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 93 A/02 | Notice amending Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Chair of the Single Resolution Board – COM/2022/20074 ( OJ C 43 A, 28.1.2022 ) | 2 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2022/C 93 A/01

Notice amending Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Member of the Board and Director of Resolution Planning and Decisions – COM/2022/20072 ( OJ C 43 A, 28.1.2022 )

( OJ C 43 A, 28.1.2022 )

1

2022/C 93 A/02

Notice amending Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Chair of the Single Resolution Board – COM/2022/20074 ( OJ C 43 A, 28.1.2022 )

( OJ C 43 A, 28.1.2022 )

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Monte THOMAS v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES

2150786

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Case reinstated January 27, 2017 February 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Case reinstated.
Exhibit 99.1



             Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
            (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Tom B. Dake, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
of Miltope Group, Inc.(the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Tom B. Dake
____________________________

Name: Tom B. Dake

Date: May 14, 2003
Exhibit 99-a

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Newhall Land and Farming Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002, I, Gary M. Cusumano, President and Chief Executive Officer of Newhall Management Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|Date: November 12, 2002 |  | THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
(a California Limited Partnership)
Registrant
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                                                                   
|                        |  | By Newhall Management Limited Partnership,
Managing General Partner               
|                        |  |                                                                                   
|                        |  | By Newhall Management Corporation,
Managing General Partner                       
|                        |  |                                                                                   
|                        |  |                                                                                   

---
# Official Journal C 377A/9 No

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 377A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 639 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 377A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 639 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 377 A/01 | Directorate-General Budget — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Deputy Director-General (grade AD 15) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2020/10397 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2020/C 377 A/01

Directorate-General Budget — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Deputy Director-General (grade AD 15) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2020/10397

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2013046EN.01003103.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/31

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 23 November 2012 — Vacarescu v Commission

(Case F-122/11)

(Civil service - Lateness - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 46/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dragos-Lucian Vacarescu (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R.-C. Radu, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 18 April 2011 by which he was refused the payment of the daily allowance provided for in Article 10 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Vacarescu shall bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Vacarescu shall bear his own costs.

---
Hunter Tyler LAFOE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3948

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Jasmond OSBORNE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-1580

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

Reconsideration granted. Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., recused.
#### In re: Hans J. HANSEN, Debtor, Arthur C. Kralowec; et al., Appellants, v. D & E Williams, Inc., Appellee.

No. 03-15600.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2004.*

Decided May 26, 2004.

David Ray Jenkins, Esq., Motschiedler Michaelides *&*Wishon, Fresno, CA, for Appellants.

Steven E. Paganetti, Wild Carter & Tip-ton, Fresno, CA, for Appellee.

*215Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILER,** and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Trustee Henry Wheeler and creditor Arthur L. Kralowec assert that the bankruptcy court erred by applying the informal proof of claim doctrine to allow a claim by D *&*E Williams, Inc. Because the facts are known to the parties, they are not repeated here.

The bankruptcy court did not err in finding that the elements of the informal proof of claim doctrine were satisfied; nor did it abuse its discretion in permitting amendment of the informal proof of claim. *See In re Holm,*931 F.2d 620, 622-23 (9th Cir.1991); *In re Sambo’s Restaurants, Inc.,*754 F.2d 811, 815-17 (9th Cir.1985).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.