alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, P. Schaefer Price, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pharmasset, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 31, 2007

|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/S/    P. SCHAEFER PRICE                               
|P. Schaefer Price President and Chief Executive Officer
Violet SEVEN, Appellant, v. BROWARD GENERAL HOSPITAL, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
L.F. v. CULLMAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2150957

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 10, 2017 Reh. denied March 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1311 

To reauthorize the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Trust Fund, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2023 

Mr. KELLY introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, 

read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall 

Trust Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Udall Foundation Re5 authorization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE UDALL FOUNDATION 

7 TRUST FUND. 

8 Section 13 of the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. 

9 Udall Foundation Act (20 U.S.C. 5609) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1311 CPS

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘2028’’; 

3 (2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 

4 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2023’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘2028’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘5-fiscal year 

7 period’’ and all that follows through the period at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘5-fiscal year period beginning 

9 with fiscal year 2024.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Tom B. Dake, certify that:

1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
     Miltope Group, Inc. (the "registrant");

2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
     under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
     to the period covered by this report;

3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
     financial information included in this report, fairly
     present in all material respects the financial condition, results
     of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
     periods presented in this report;

4)   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
     for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
     (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
     registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
          such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
          our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
          to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
          is made known to us by others within those entities,
          particularly during the period in which this report is being
          prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures and presented in this report our
          conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
          and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
          report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
          the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
          affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
          registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5)   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
     disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
     over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
     the equivalent function):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
          design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
          which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
          information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
          or other employees who have a significant role in the
          registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 12, 2003

                                    Vice President and Chief
                                    Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000751256
<NAME> DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1985-2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,871
<PP&E>                                      22,442,345
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,377,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,437
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,153
<SALES>                                         93,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,572
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2 Section 906 CFO Certification





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Valley Commerce Bancorp (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Roy O. Estridge, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  March
      18, 2008/s/ Roy O. EstridgeRoy
      O. EstridgeExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
f10k2011ex10xxvi_chinaginsen.htm


Exhibit 10.26







Description of Oral Amendment of Loan Agreement







Loan agreement:







On March 2, 2010, the Company purchased a production factory of ginseng beverage for total consideration of 9,000,000 RMB. In order to pay the seller, the Company obtained an 8 million RMB (about USD $1,203,312) bank loan from Meihekou City Rural Credit Union on September 10, 2010. The principal terms of the 8 million RMB bank loan agreement are as follows:








	
· 

	
Parties: Ganzhi Ginseng Products Co., Ltd (“Ganzhi”) and Meihekou City Rural Credit Union (“Meihekou Credit Union”);













	
· 

	
Meihekou Credit Union granted a loan of 8 million RMB (about USD $ 1,203,312) to Ganzhi to be used to pay off its debt and the term of the loan is 23 months from September 10, 2010 to August 10, 2012;













	
· 

	
The loan carries an annual floating rate equals to 90% of the benchmark interest rate.  The benchmark interest rate is the rate announced by the People’s Bank of China as an interest rate of same type and class of loans at the date of the loan and changes with the adjustment of national bank rate.  Meihekou Credit Union calculates the interest on a monthly basis applying this annual floating rate which is payable on the 21st day of each month. The Company is current on the payment of the interest;













	
· 

	
The payment shall be made in the order of loan expense, interest and principal. Ganzhi shall pay 1,600,000 RMB (about USD $240,662) principal on August 10, 2011 and the rest of principal of 6,400,000 RMB (about USD $962,650) on August 10, 2012.












Ganzhi is currently in default on paying the 1,600,000 RMB principal.







Oral Amendment of Loan Agreement:







Meihekou Credit Union and Ganzhi have orally agreed on August 10, 2011 that the due day of paying the 1,600,000 RMB principal shall be extended to August 10, 2012.

















I hereby confirm that the above description is true and accurate:







/s/ Liu, Changzhen


Liu, Changzhen


Dated: October 10, 2011
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, George P. Christopulos, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report; 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and 6. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this Annual Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Dated: March 21, 2007 /s/ George P. Christopulos George P. Christopulos,   CEO, President, CFO, and Chairman Of the Board
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                        Registrant: Raster Graphics, Inc.

              Statement of Computation of Income (Loss) Per Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three Months Ended            Nine Months Ended
                                             September 30,                September 30,
                                         ---------------------        ---------------------
                                           1996         1995           1996          1995
                                         -------       -------        -------       -------
<S>                                    <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>     
HISTORICAL:

Net income (loss)                        $   964       $  (329)       $ 2,165       $   (55)
                                         =======       =======        =======       =======
Weighted average common 
   shares outstanding                      5,388           207          2,070           203
Common equivalent shares from
   stock options, convertible
   preferred stock and warrants            3,561          --            5,320          --
Shares related to SAB Nos. 55, 64,
   and 83                                   --             802            535           802
                                         -------       -------        -------       -------
Shares used in computing net
   income (loss) per share                 8,949         1,009          7,925         1,005
                                         =======       =======        =======       =======
Net income (loss) per share              $  0.11       $ (0.33)       $  0.27       $ (0.05)
                                         =======       =======        =======       =======

PROFORMA:

Net income (loss)                        $   964       $  (329)       $ 2,165       $   (55)
                                         =======       =======        =======       =======
Weighted average common  
   shares outstanding                       5,388           207          2,070           203
Common equivalent shares from
   stock options, convertible
   preferred stock and warrants            3,561         5,449          5,320         5,383
Shares related to SAB Nos. 55, 64,
   and 83                                   --             802            535           802
                                         -------       -------        -------       -------
Shares used in computing net
   income (loss) per share                 8,948         6,458          7,925         6,388
                                         =======       =======        =======       =======
Net income (loss) per share              $  0.11       $ (0.05)       $  0.27       $ (0.01)
                                         =======       =======        =======       =======
</TABLE>
Irma DORSEY v. PURVIS CONTRACTING GROUP, LLC and Jon P. Purvis C/W

Irma Dorsey v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al.

NO. 2018-C-0199

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.
R. B. H., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4959

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20903 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KENNETH LEE ADERHOLT, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-93-163-2

- - - - - - - - - - July 29, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Kenneth Lee Aderholt appeals his sentence, given by the district court on remand from this court. Aderholt pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and aiding and abetting mail fraud. Aderholt argues, for the first time on appeal, that the district court erred by failing to consider the two offenses as one offense pursuant to the grouping scheme of U.S.S.G. § 3D2.1No. 96-20903 - 2 - and imposing a sentence that was equal to the statutory maximum sentence for a single offense, rather than departing upward from the guidelines and imposing two consecutive statutory-maximum
sentences. The district court retains discretion to impose a concurrent or consecutive sentence when the district court is departing from the guidelines if the departure itself is appropriate. See United States v. Martinez , 950 F.2d 222, 226 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Miller , 903 F.2d 341, 346-49 (5th Cir. 1990). A sentencing court may depart upward from the guidelines whenever it finds that an aggravating circumstance exists that was not adequately taken into consideration by the guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b). United States v. Anderson , 5 F.3d 795, 803 (5th Cir. 1993). The district court properly based its departure on § 5K2.1 because of the death that resulted from the mail fraud, articulated sufficient reasons for the upward departure, and imposed a reasonable sentence. See id . Aderholt cannot demonstrate any error, much less plain error that affected his substantial rights, by the district court’s imposition of consecutive sentences against him. See United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 231-37 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1265 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1265

    To provide the United States District Court for the District of 
 Columbia with original and exclusive jurisdiction over civil actions 
                       with a nationwide effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2023

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide the United States District Court for the District of 
 Columbia with original and exclusive jurisdiction over civil actions 
                       with a nationwide effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Judge Shopping Act''.

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OVER CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH NATIONWIDE EFFECT.

    The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall 
have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action for 
declaratory or injunctive relief (including a nationwide injunction, 
stay, vacatur, or any other relief with similar nationwide force and 
effect) against the enforcement of any Federal law (including 
regulations and Executive orders) if the relief extends beyond the 
parties to the civil action.

SEC. 3. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act may be construed to--
            (1) affect any action that may be brought in the Supreme 
        Court of the United States, a court of appeals of the United 
        States, or the Court of International Trade;
            (2) create a private right of action; or
            (3) expand liability otherwise imposed, or limit any 
        defense otherwise available, under Federal or State law.
                                 <all>
```