alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I,Ricardo Bernardes, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlsover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 28, 2005
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------



                                 CERTIFICATION

        I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
        Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
        respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,
        of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2004-22CB;

        2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
        whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
        omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
        not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
        report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
        required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
        the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
        these reports is included in these reports;

        4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
        master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
        and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
        under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
        master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
        and

        5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
        master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
        based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
        after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
        Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set
        forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is
        included in these reports.

        In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
        information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
        Bank of New York, as Trustee.

        Date: March 29, 2005

                                  /s/ Steve Bailey
                                  -----------------
                                  Steve Bailey
                                  Senior Managing Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-5070

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE R. TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-05-25)

Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert G. McCoid, MCCAMIC, SACCO, PIZZUTI & MCCOID, PLLC, Wheeling,

West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas E. Johnston, United States

Attorney, John C. Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling,

West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

George R. Taylor appeals his conviction and 110-month

sentence pursuant to his guilty plea for aiding and abetting the

possession with intent to distribute more than five grams of

cocaine base, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000) and 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B) (2000).

Counsel for Taylor has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he states there

are no meritorious issues for review, but presenting the issue of

whether the district court erred in its calculation of Taylor’s

criminal history score. Although informed of his right to file a

pro se supplemental brief, Taylor has not done so.

Taylor’s plea agreement included a provision by which he

agreed to waive his right to appeal any prison sentence under 125

months. Taylor knowingly and voluntarily agreed to this provision.

We conclude that the appeal waiver is valid and enforceable.

Because Taylor received a sentence shorter than 125 months, he has

waived his right to appeal. See United States v. Blick, 408 F.3d

162, 168 (4th Cir. 2005).

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for

appeal. We therefore affirm Taylor’s conviction and sentence.

This court requires that counsel inform Taylor, in writing, of the

right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for
- 3 -

further review. If Taylor requests that a petition be filed, but

counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then

counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from

representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof

was served on Taylor.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### ORDER DISMISSING PETITION Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, the petition in Docket No. 65993 is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED. 

# S o.„ freta; 

### , C.J.

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Wolfenzon Rolle Edwards Angius & Terry LLP/Las Vegas Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP/Las Vegas Canepa Riedy Abele & Castello Maddox, Isaacson & Cisneros, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 

### 2 (0) 1947A VIZ I3ttt raififialaga rdac:iflidr a 'A tear tro m itm oirwinasqs cisztral
. 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I,Masakazu Kurushima, 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrantand we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 29, 2005
EEA REALTY, LLC
                              1925 N. LYNN STREET
                                   SUITE 901
                              ARLINGTON, VA 22208

                  TEL. (703) 525-1600      FAX (703) 525-1609

Via Facsimile & U.S. Mail - 847-317-4462

April 4, 1997

N. H. Associates
c/o The Balcor Company
Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
2355 Waukegan Road
Suite A-200
Bannockburn, Illinois  60015

Attention:  Ms. Ilona Adams

     Re:  Agreement of Sale by and Between EEA Development, Inc. as Purchaser 
          and N. H. Associates, as Seller, dated February 21, 1997, with 
          respect to property known as the North Hill Apartments, as amended

Dear Ms. Adams:

EEA Development, Inc., the Purchaser under the above referenced Agreement of
Sale, as amended, the (_Agreement_), is hereby terminating the Agreement.
However, we would like to proceed with the transaction under revised terms
which we are discussing with Dan Charleston under separate cover.

If we are able to reach an agreement under the aforementioned revised terms,
please have your counsel prepare an appropriate amendment to the agreement.

If, however, we are unable to reach an agreement under revised terms, the
Earnest Money Deposit shall be returned as set forth in the Agreement.  Thank
you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

/s/ R. Stewart Bartley, V.P.
R. Stewart Bartley
Finance and Acquisitions

Attachment

RSB/lab

cc:  Mark D. Betts
     Dan Charleston
     Traci Harris
     Kyle Hauberg
     Mike Kelly
     Al Suto   
<PAGE>
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


          I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
          on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
          respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
          report, of CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2004-J7;

          2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
          a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
          the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
          these reports is included in these reports;

          4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
          agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
          review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
          reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          that agreement; and

          5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that
          is included in these reports.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
          The Bank of New York, as Trustee, BankUnited, FSB, Downey Savings
          and Loan Association, F.A., Fifth Third Mortgage Company, HSBC
          Mortgage Corporation (USA), National City Mortgage Company and Sun
          Trust Mortgage Incorporated.


          Date: March 28, 2005




                                    /s/ Steve Bailey
                                    ----------------
                                    Steve Bailey
                                    Senior Managing Director
EXHIBIT 32.1   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Nicholas Keating, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. February 06, 2008  /s/ C. NICHOLAS KEATING, JR. 
C. Nicholas Keating, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 67 (Thursday, April 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-3281-005]


Abel, James E.; Notice of Filing

April 2, 2009.
    Take notice that on March 31, 2009, James E. Abel filed an 
application for authorization to hold interlocking positions pursuant 
to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act and part 45 of the 
regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 18 CFR part 45 
(2008).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c3a392e3f3312101512192f090c0c130e083c1a190e1f521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ccac9decfc3e2e0e5e2e9dff9fcfce3fef8cceae9feefa2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 23, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8047 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service**  **Plant Protection and Quarantine** 

## Risk Management Document 

## Importation of Fresh Fruit of Tejocote ( **Crataegus pubescens (Kunth) Steud.) from Mexico into the Contin**  **ental United States** 

**March 3**  **1 , 20**  **11**

**Plant Health Programs (PHP) R**  **egulatory Coordination and Compliance (**  **R CC**  **) Contact Person:**  **Dave Lam b** **Introduction**

In response to a request for market access to import fresh f ruit of Tejocote ( Crataegus pubescens (Kunth) Steud.) from Mexico in to the c ontinental United States , the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHI S) prepared a pest risk assessment (PRA) as per the Guidelines for Pathway -Initia ted Pest Risk Assessment (USDA. 2000) . The pest risk assessment document, Importation of Fresh Fruit of Tejocote (Crataegus pubescens (Kunth) Steud.) from Mexico into the Continental United States found no quarantine pest s of Tejocote in Mexico (USDA. 2 0 11 ) . No risk mitigations are required other than port - ofentry inspection, limitation of imports to commercial shipments only , and inspection by the NPPO that, when appropriate, will issue a phy tosanitary certificate indicating the commodity has been i nspected and no pests are present. **Risk Management Measures**

 Tejocote must be imported as commercial shipments only .  Each consignment of Tejocote must be accompanied by a phy tosanitary certificate issued by NPPO of the exporting country stating that the Tejocote in the consignment has been inspected and is free of pests.

 Each shipment is subject to inspection upon arrival at port of entry to the United States. **Conclusion** No quarantine pests were identified by the pest risk assessment as following the p athway of fresh Tejocote from Mexico . APHI S concludes that the phy tosanitary measures proposed in this document will result in the effective removal of any potential quarantine pests associated with the importation of fresh Tejocote fruit from Mexico . **References:** PPQ. 2000. Guidelines for pathway - initiated pest risk assessments (Version 5.02). United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ), Riverdale, MD. 30 pp. USDA. 20 11 . Importation of Fresh Fruit of Tejocote ( Crataegus pubescens (Kunth) Steud.) from Mexico into the Continental United States . A Qualitative , Pathway - In itiated Pest Risk Assessment. USDA, APHI S, CPHST, PERAL , Raleigh, NC. 13 pp.**Authors**

Walter P. Gould Senior Risk Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-24-1995
<CASH>                                           42032
<SECURITIES>                                     58184
<RECEIVABLES>                                    72886
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4279
<INVENTORY>                                      34782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                224240
<PP&E>                                           28149
<DEPRECIATION>                                   90200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  264563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            71235
<BONDS>                                          33526
<COMMON>                                           207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      159595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    264563
<SALES>                                         161583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                247128
<CGS>                                            64671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   123169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 89888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  33977
<INCOME-TAX>                                     11892
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              22085
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     22085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
        

</TABLE>
Andre L. GRANT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-1307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.