alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7830]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 109]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank''), 
as a part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This collection allows insured/
guaranteed parties and insurance brokers to report overdue payments 
from the borrower and/or guarantor. Our customers will submit this form 
electronically through Ex-Im Online, replacing paper reporting. In this 
form, Ex-Im Bank has simplified reporting of payment defaults by 
including checkboxes and providing for many fields to be self-populated 
by Ex-Im Online. Ex-Im Bank provides insurance, loans and guarantees 
for the financing of exports of goods and services.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 8, 2009 to 
be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments and requests for additional information 
to Mauricio Paredes, Export-Import Bank of the U.S., 811 Vermont 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3266.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Numbers: EIB 09-01 Payment Default Report (Online).
    OMB Number: None.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information requested enables insured/guaranteed 
parties and insurance brokers to report overdue payments from the 
borrower and/or guarantor.
    Affected Public: Insured/guaranteed parties and brokers.
    Estimated Annual Respondents: 200.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 50 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: On occasion.

Solomon Bush,
Agency Clearance Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-7830 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
Dan Allen HUSSAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3692

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
##### 



Exhibit 31.1Section 302 Certification I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing
distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by
this annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 6;  1.
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to
the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for
inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;  3.
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the
annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
and  4.
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee
and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth in
the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A. Date: March 29, 2005 By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Name: Ellen Z. Lamale
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Annual Report of JMG Exploration, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Justin Yorke, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: July 23­­, 2010  /s/ Justin YorkeName:Justin YorkeTitle:Chief Executive and Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JMG Exploration, Inc.   and will be retained by JMG Exploration, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Donald S. VERNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4064

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ricardo Manuel MONTANEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2639

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cyber Informatix, Inc.: Exhibit 10.4 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com









Exhibit 10.4
**Certificate of Registration**
 **on Change of Name**
 
 This is to certify that
 
 **SMARTMICROCHIP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD**
 
 **Australian Company Number 100 170 867**
 
 did on the twenty-second day of November 2002 change its name to
 
 **SMARTMETRIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD**
 
 **Australian Company Number 100 170 867**
 
 The company is a proprietary company.
 
 The Company is limited by shares.
 
 The company is registered under the Corporations Act of 2001 and
 is taken to be registered in New South Wales and the date
 of commencement of registration is the tenth day of April, 2002.
 
 
 Issued by the
 Australian Securities and Investments Commission
 on this twenty-second day of November, 2002.
 
 
 /s/ David Knott
 David Knott
 Chairman
     
 
 
 
 
 
 **Certificate of Registration**
 **Of a Company**
 
 This is to certify that
 
 **SMARTMICROCHIP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD**
 
 **Australian Company Number 100 170 867**
 
 is a registered company under the Corporations Act 2001 and
 is taken to be registered in New South Wales.
 
 The company **is limited by shares.**
 
 The company is a **proprietary** company.
 
 The day of commencement of registration is
 **the tenth day of April 2002.**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Issued by the
 Australian Securities and Investment Commission
 on this tenth day of April, 2002.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ David Knott
 David Knott
 Chairman
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Samgodson ESSELL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-50000.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 14, 2004.

Gregory W. Jessner, Esq., Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Samgodson Essell, Federal Correctional Institution, White Deer, PA, pro se.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Samgodson Essell appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for reconsideration of the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion to modify his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s denial of an extension of time to file a notice of appeal for abuse of discretion, *see Alaska Limestone Corp. v. Hodel,*799 F.2d 1409, 1411 (9th Cir.1986), and we affirm.

Essell argues that his failure to file a timely notice of appeal is excusable neglect because the district court did not inform him of the denial of his section 3582 motion. He thus contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for reconsideration. Even assuming excusable neglect, Essell’s contention must fail. *See United States v. Buzard,*884 F.2d 475, 475-76 (9th Cir.1989) (stating that a court’s failure to notify parties of its order does not toll the time in which to file a notice of appeal); *see also United States v. Green,*89 F.3d 657, 660-61 (9th Cir.1996) (stating that a district court cannot extend the time to file a notice of appeal beyond 40 days after the entry of judgment).

Additionally, because Essell did not receive specific assurances from the district court, he does not qualify for the unique circumstances doctrine. This doctrine “applies only where a court has affirmatively assured a party that its appeal will be timely.” *In re Slimick,*928 F.2d 304, 310 (9th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED.1

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a reply brief is denied as unnecessary. The reply brief was filed in a timely manner. The Clerk is instructed to file the Appellant’s brief received on November 3, 2003.
John ROSS, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, N.A., as Indenture Trustee FOR GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING TRUST 2006-HE1 ; and Linda Doggett, as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Lee County, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-217

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Thomas
Kreig, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Ironclad Performance Wear
Corporation.
   Dated:
March 26, 2009
  /s/
      Thomas KreigThomas
      Kreig,Interim
      Chief Financial Officer
 This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability
of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace.  Such certification shall not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1883
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               68
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1883
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    53
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        7
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (87)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (87)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (87)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)
        

</TABLE>
Archie L. ROBINSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3373

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Katrina SMITH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1598

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


This Extension Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated as of September 29, 2011, is entered into by and among Robertson Health Services, Inc. (formerly NxOpinion, LLC), a Nevada corporation (“Company”) and ________________________________ (“Consultant”).


 


RECITALS:


 


WHEREAS, the Company is indebted to the Consultant in the amount of $________ for management consulting services rendered by the Consultant as evidenced by an Amended and Restated Promissory Note Agreement dated May 28, 2010 with an extended maturity date of September 30, 2011 (“Note”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Consultant agree to extend the maturity date of the Note in accordance with the terms hereof.


 


AGREEMENT:


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Extension of Maturity Date.  The Maturity Date under the Note is hereby extended for an additional 3 months until December 31, 2011.







 



	
  

	
2.

	
Interest.  The unpaid principal balance shall continue to accrue interest at a rate of 5%.







 



	
  

	
3.

	
Full Force and Effect.  Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Note shall remain in full force and effect.  Except for any waivers and modifications contained herein, this Agreement shall not in any way waive or prejudice any of the rights or obligations of the Consultant or the Company under the Note, under any law, in equity or otherwise, and such waivers and modifications shall not constitute a waiver or modification of any other provision of the Note nor a waiver or modification of any subsequent default or breach of any obligation of the Company or of any subsequent right of Consultant.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of September 29, 2011.


 


Company:                                                                                                                                              Consultant:


Robertson Health Services Inc.

















_______________________________                                                                                     ________________________________


[Name,
Title]                                                                                                                                          [Name]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Education Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Trust”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy Churchey, Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, certify, in my capacity as an officer of the Trust, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| |                                                                                                                             
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




| |                                                                                                                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.




February 28, 2013/s/ Randy ChurcheyRandy ChurcheyChief Executive Officer





In accordance with SEC Release NO. 34-47986, this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 68134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27136]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8518]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Renaissance to Goya: Prints and Drawings from Spain''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Renaissance to Goya: Prints and Drawings 
from Spain,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the New Mexico Museum of Art, from on or about December 14, 2013, until 
on or about March 9, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 1, 2013.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-27136 Filed 11-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  February 19, 2010 /s/Cosmo Palmieri     Chief Executive Officer
05/12/201 1 17:3 2 FA X 202483514 2 FA A • > DM S @l001/00 2

Befor e th e U.S . Departmen t of Transportatio o Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n I n tli e maile r

o f BRATNER

D HELICOPTER , AnTMFN TO F -^SPORlAllO N •: ! OFERAT;0N ^

- • -i'i V 1 3 AH : 0 3 Judg e Richar dC . Goodwi n DocketNo.CPlOSWOOl ? FAA Cas e No . 2009SW91026 8

WITHDRAWA LO FCOMPLAIN T Pursuan t t o Rul e 21 5 o f

th e Rule s o f

Practic e in FAA Civi l Penalty Actions , 1 4 C.F.R . § 13-215 , th e Complainant , Federal Aviatio n Administration , hereb y withdraw s it s Complain t i n th e abov e matter . Respectfull y submitted .

Charle s Raley , Attorne y Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Telephone : (202 ) 267-335 7 Facsimile : (202)267-510 6 Date : May 11,201 1

/f'f v it^< ' W 

## ^BARIN G DOCKE T05/12/201 1 17:3 2 FA X 202493514 2 FA A* DM S 121002/00 2

CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y that o n thi s dat e I hav e place di n th e U.S . mail , postag e prepaid , certifie d return-receipt , acop y o f

th e Complainant' s Withdrawal o f Complain t

i n th e eas e o f

In th e Matte r o f Brainer dHelicopier , FAA Cas e no , 2009SW910268 , an don e cop y b y facsimile , addresse dto : Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwi n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Department

o f Transpoitaiio n 1200 Ne w Jersey Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g GroundFloor , Roo mE 12-320 Washington , D C 2059 0 Facsimile : (202 ) 366-753 6 I n addition , I hereb y certif y tha t on thi s date I hav e sen t

b y th e U.S . mail , postag e prepaid , certifie dreium-receipt , an db y facsimile , copie s o f th e foregoin g document

to : Donal dMark , Jr . Fafinsk i Mar k & Johnson , P.A . 77 5 Prairi e Cente

r Drive , Suit

e 40 0 Eden Prairie , M

N 55344 Facsimile : (952 ) 995-957 7 I n addition , 1 hereb y certif y that o n thi s date I hav e sen t

by th e U.S . mail , postag e prepaid , ccrliCe dreturn-receipt , th e original an don e cop y o f th e foregoin g document

to : Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , A GC-43 0 Wilbu r Wright Buildin g - Suite 2W100 0

Date : Ma

y 11 , 201 1