alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clark PROCTOR, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-7762.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 19, 2004.

DECIDED: Decided June 1, 2004.

Clark Proctor, Jr., Appellant pro se.

Thomas Richard Ascik, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*459Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Clark Proctor, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order summarily denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Proctor has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 99.1


             Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
            (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Tom B. Dake, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
of Miltope Group, Inc.(the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 29, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Tom B. Dake
____________________________

Name:     Tom B. Dake
Date:     August 12, 2003
Adra MORRISON a/k/a Adra E. Morrison, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee FOR MASTER ASSET BACKED SECURITIES TRUST 2006-WMC2, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-WMC2; Phillip G. Morrison; Association of Poinciana Villages, Inc.; Poinciana Village Seven Association, Inc; Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 10, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2455 

To suspend temporarily the duty on imitation jewelry necklaces or bracelets, 

valued $10 each or higher. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on imitation jewelry 

necklaces or bracelets, valued $10 each or higher. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMITATION JEWELRY NECKLACES OR BRACE4 LETS, VALUED $10 EACH OR HIGHER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Imitation jewelry necklaces or 

bracelets, valued $10 each or 

higher (provided for in subheading 7117.19.90) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2455 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Leela VARGHESE and Valiance, Inc., Appellant, v. BRENRECO, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5671

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1633

In re: WILLIE HORTON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(1:89-cr-00180-AJT-1)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Horton, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Horton petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an 

order directing the district court to grant relief on his 

underlying post-conviction proceedings. We conclude that Horton 

is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a 

drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 

402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 

(4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only 

when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In 

re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 

1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. 

In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Horton is not available by way of mandamus. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
WORLDS.COM  ,
INC. 


 11
Royal Road 


 Brookline,
MA 02445 




   


 December
3, 2007 




   


 Mr. Philip
Hoffman 


 Pearson
Tnc. 


 130
Avenue of the Amencas 


 New
York, 10019 


   


 Re:
Worlds.com, Inc. (“Worlds”) 






   


 Dear
 Mr. Hoffman: 


   


  As
we have discussed on
October 21, 2000 Worlds executed a promissory
note in your favor  
in the face amount of $631,950,
which note came due on
January 2, 2002. By our signatures below we have agreed to the
following settlement (i) You will
have the right to receive $47,400 of shares of our common stock based upon the offering
price of our next registered public offering at the close of such offering, which amounts represents approximately 7.5% (or $0.075/$1.00)
of the face amount of said promissory note; (ii) Worlds will provide services free of charge to your company in the approximate
amount of $631,950 with such services consisting of the design, creation and production of one or more three dimensional internet
web site(s) and Worlds represents that said site(s) will be of comparable quality as the sites it is building for its other customers
and that the valuation of its services will be based upon the value of similar services it provides to other customers through
arms length transactions; (iii) You acknowledge that the previous debt is now extinguished and that you have no claims with respect
hereto against Worlds; and (iv) Worlds may publicly announce that it is building “world(s)” for your company. 


   


 I
greatly appreciate your cooperation in this matter, your faith in me, and the vision we both share for Worlds’ future. 








    


 Sincerely
yours, 


 WORLDS.COM,
INC. 


 By:
Thom Kidrin 


 Thom
Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer 











   





   


 ACKNOWLEDGED
AND AGREED 


 PEARSON
INC 


 By:
Philip Hoffman 


 Philip
Hoffman, 12/13/02
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         591,411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               591,411
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 655,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,529
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,658,979)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               634,775
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               791,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (157,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (157,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (157,041)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 1.8
    COPY
   APPROVED
  AMENDMENTS
 TO THE CHARTER OF
 Open Joint Stock Company
 Mechel
 (hereinafter, the Company)
      
    Representative office of the Company in the Republic of Korea
    located at the address: No. 202,
    146-5 LOFT
    Building, Samsung-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, Korea,
    135-878;
    Representative office of the Company in Japan located at the
    address: No 302 Atagoyama Bengoshi Building 1-6-7 Atago
    Minato-ku, Tokyo
    105-0002;
    Representative office of the Company in the Peoples
    Republic of China located at the address: Jingguang Center bldg
    1 #3310A, Chaoyang District, Beijing.  Moscow, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2434 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2434

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on magnesium aluminum 
  hydroxide carbonate (synthetic hydrotalcite) and magnesium aluminum 
 hydroxide carbonate (synthetic hydrotalcite) coated with stearic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on magnesium aluminum 
  hydroxide carbonate (synthetic hydrotalcite) and magnesium aluminum 
 hydroxide carbonate (synthetic hydrotalcite) coated with stearic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE CARBONATE (SYNTHETIC 
              HYDROTALCITE) AND MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE CARBONATE 
              (SYNTHETIC HYDROTALCITE) COATED WITH STEARIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to magnesium aluminum hydroxide 
carbonate (synthetic hydrotalcite) and magnesium aluminum hydroxide 
carbonate (synthetic hydrotalcite) coated with stearic acid) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
John E. O'DONNELL, individually and as Trustee of the Diane Joy Milam Dennis Revocable Trust, Petitioner, v. NORTH FLORIDA LAND TRUST, INC., a Florida Nonprofit Corporation, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5066

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 27, 2018

Edward J Fucillo of Fucillo Law Firm, P.L., Dunedin, for Petitioner.

Alan S. Wachs, Jacksonville; Bryan S. Gowdy of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville; Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*890The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Ray, and Makar, JJ., concur.
Albert F. CRANDALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-246

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

VIRCO MFG. CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS 906 OF THE
ADOPTED SECTION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virco Mfg. Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert A. Virtue, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



|Date: December 13, 2002 | /s/ Robert A. Virtue     
|----------------------- | -------------------------
|                        | Robert A. VirtuePresident
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Dockery MCLAUGHLIN, IV, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50329.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Matthew Umhofer, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Elizabeth A. Newman, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alfred Dockery McLaughlin, IV, appeals his 30-month sentence following his guilty plea conviction for attempted unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).

McLaughlin contends that the district court erred by denying his requested downward departure for reduced mental *770capacity under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary denial of a request for departure, and we dismiss. *See United States v. Smith,*330 F.3d 1209, 1212 (9th Cir.2003).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) PERFORMANCE AIR LTD. ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2009-0139 ) for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 ) (Bahamas-U.S. charters) ) __________________________________________)

APPLICATION OF PERFORMANCE AIR LTD. FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to th is document should be sent to: John R. Mietus, Jr. Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 (202) 747-5212 (240) 396-5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for PERFORMANCE AIR LTD.

NOTICE: Any person may support or oppose th is application by filing an answer and serving a copy of the answer on counsel for Performance Air and upon persons served with th is application no later than October 10, 2011.

September 21, 2011BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) PERFORMANCE AIR LTD. ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2009-0139 ) September 21, 2011 for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 ) (Bahamas-U.S. charters) ) __________________________________________)

APPLICATION OF PERFORMANCE AIR LTD. FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109(c), Pe rformance Air Ltd. ("Performance Air") respectfully requests renewa l of the above-captioned exem ption, granted by Notice of Action Taken dated September 23, 2010 (the “Notice”), for an additional, one-year period. The Notice permits Performance Ai r to engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons, pr operty, and mail between a point or points in the Bahamas and a point or points in the Un ited States, and other charters pursuant to 14 CFR Part 212 of the Department’s regulations, using small aircraft. Performance Air intends to invoke the automatic extension provisi ons of 5 U.S.C. § 558(c) and Part 377 of the Department's Special Regulations. In support of this application, it states as follows: 1. Performance Air is a Bahamian flag carrier and intends to operate BahamasU.S. charter service under the above-captioned charter author ity. It remains licensed by

the Bahamian Department of Civil Aviation to perform charter air transportation, and Bahamas-U.S. charter operations remain governed by principles of comity and reciprocity that support the Department’s continued grant of authority. See, e.g., Inter Island Charters Ltd., Notice of Action Taken dated April 12, 2010 in Docket OST-2009-0039.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ricardo Bernardes, in my capacity as the Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on October 25, 2007 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and the information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.

Dated: October 25, 2007



By:

/s/ RICARDO BERNARDESRicardo BernardesExecutive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Nicholas Keating, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. August 04, 2009  /s/ C. NICHOLAS KEATING, JR. 
C. Nicholas Keating, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
AMERICAN
HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION


ANNUAL
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE


SALE
AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND


ITEM
1123 OF REGULATION AB








I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify
that I am the Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Compliance
Officer of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
"Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as
servicer (the "Servicer" and "Sponsor") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement") dated as of May 1, 2009 among the Servicer and Sponsor,
American Honda Receivables Corp., as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2009-2
Owner Trust, as follows:





(i)
            A
      review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended
      March 31, 2010, and of its
      performance under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision.




(ii)
            To the best of my knowledge and
      information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its
      obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material
      respects.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand this 28thday of June, 2010.




/s/ Paul C. HondaPaul
      C. HondaAssistant
      Vice President, Assistant Secretary, and Compliance
  Officer(senior
      officer in charge of the servicing
function)
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: February 14, 2003                 /s/ Tami J Story
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Tami J Story
                                       Acting Chief Financial Officer