alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dwayne LINDSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the annual report of Empirical Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derek Ward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: February 21, 2014
By:
/s/ Dereck WardName:
Derek WardTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2540 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Basic Violet 11:1. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on Basic Violet 

11:1. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC VIOLET 11:1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.25 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Basic Violet 11:1) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2540 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Deion J. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3410

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Stephen Cody HAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4391

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Tracy GARRETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-3150

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE AFFIRMATIVE INSURANCE CO.

1150166

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 21, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
NUMBER 13-10-00508-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: KIRK WAYNE McBRIDE, SR.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relator, Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr., pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in 

the above cause on September 17, 2010, seeking to compel the trial court to rule on a 

“Petition for Temporary Restraining Order.” According to the petition, relator submitted 

his request for a temporary restraining order to the district clerk on July 14, 2010, 

however, the trial court has not yet issued a ruling thereon. We deny the petition for writ 

of mandamus.

First, the petition for writ of mandamus fails to comply with the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3. Second, relator has not 
demonstrated either that the trial court expressly refused to rule on relator’s petition for 

temporary restraining order or that an unreasonable amount of time has passed since 

the petition was filed. See In re Dimas, 88 S.W.3d 349, 351 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 

2002, orig. proceeding); In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2001, 

orig. proceeding); Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 

1992, orig. proceeding); accord O'Connor v. First Ct. of Appeals, 837 S.W.2d 94, 97 

(Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of 

mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

8th day of October, 2010.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2482 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-vinylbenzenesulfonic acid, sodium salt 

hydrate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-vinylbenzenesulfonic 

acid, sodium salt hydrate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-VINYLBENZENESULFONIC ACID, SODIUM 

4 SALT HYDRATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-vinylbenzenesulfonic acid, 

sodium salt hydrate (CAS 

No. 2695–37–6) (provided 

for in subheading 

2904.10.37) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2482 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ex1020.htm


 


 


Exhibit 10.20
T.M., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Geovanni OLIVO-CORTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-173

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Form of First ULB Corp. Common Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.1
STATE of Louisiana v. Briceson CARTER

No. 2018-KK-0555

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS**

Writ denied.

Genovese, J., would grant and assigns reasons:

I disagree with this Court's denial of defendant's application for a supervisory writ in this case. Defendant seeks a reversal of the trial court's ruling which granted the state's motion to introduce evidence of an other crime, wrong, or act, in accordance with La.Code Evid. art. 404(B) and *State v. Prieur* , 277 So.2d 126 (La.1973), at defendant's trial on the charge of second degree murder.

The facts presented indicate that the alleged other crime, wrong, or act occurred four years after the alleged murder for which the defendant is charged. I find no connexity, pattern, motive, intent, or relationship to the original crime with which the defendant is charged. Thus, the alleged other crime, wrong, or act does not fall within the parameters of 404(B) and is inadmissible.

Further, the 404(B) evidence which the state seeks to introduce is highly prejudicial. Even assuming, arguendo, that the state's evidence meets the strict standards of La.Code Evid. art. 404(B), the evidence is unquestionably more prejudicial than probative, in contravention of La.Code Evid. art. 403, and should not be allowed. Therefore, I would grant this writ, reverse the trial court's ruling, and deny the state's *Prieur* motion.
#### Anthony WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rosie GARCIA; G. Castillo; D. Mettler, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-56913.

D.C. No. CV-99-00606-BTM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2004.*

Decided May 14, 2004.

Anthony Williams, Coalinga, CA, pro se.

Attorney General, Richard F. Wolfe, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before SNEED, SKOPIL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Anthony Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Williams’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We affirm.

Williams contends that the defendants acted with deliberate indifference when they placed him in an upper-tier cell despite his medical authorization to be placed in a lower-tier cell. Williams has a lower left leg amputation and he ambulates with a prosthetic device and walking cane. Williams’ cell transfer request was delayed for over a week, and, during that time, he suffered a fall while navigating the stairs between the tiers.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment. Taking the facts in a light most favorable to Williams, we conclude that defendants’ conduct did not violate a constitutional right. *See Saucier v. Katz,*533 U.S. 194, 201, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001) (noting if no constitutional right was violated, “there is no necessity for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity”). The record establishes that Williams’ transfer to an upper-tier cell took place during a period of heightened prison security and a temporary prison lockdown. The transfer of Williams to an upper-tier cell and the subsequent delay in processing his request to return to a lower-tier cell under these circumstances does not evidence a deliberate indifference to Williams’ medical needs. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 844, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (noting prison officers are. free from *174liability “if they responded reasonably to the risk, even if the harm ultimately was not averted”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
ex10-32.htm


 


Exhibit 10.32
# Official Journal C 166A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 166A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6215 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 166A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6215 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 166 A/01 | Directorate-Generalfor Energy — Publicationof a vacancy for a Director function (grade AD14) — DirectorateENER.A ‘EnergyPolicy’ (Brussels) (Article29 (2) of the Staff Regulation) — COM/2019/10385 | 1 |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| 2019/C 166 A/02 | Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2019/10386 | 7 |
| 2019/C 166 A/03 | Directorate-General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2019/10384 | 12 |
| 2019/C 166 A/04 | Directorate-General for Trade — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2019/10387 | 17 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2019/C 166 A/01

Directorate-Generalfor Energy — Publicationof a vacancy for a Director function (grade AD14) — DirectorateENER.A ‘EnergyPolicy’ (Brussels) (Article29 (2) of the Staff Regulation) — COM/2019/10385

1

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

2019/C 166 A/02

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2019/10386

7

2019/C 166 A/03

Directorate-General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2019/10384

12

2019/C 166 A/04

Directorate-General for Trade — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Principal Adviser (Grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2019/10387

17

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----- Forwarded by Jaime Pagan/RTP/USEPA/US on 06/16/2008 03:56 PM -----

"Farr, Clint J

(DEC)"

<clint.farr@alas To

ka.gov> Jaime Pagan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,

Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

05/22/2008 11:37 cc

AM "Farr, Clint J (DEC)"

<clint.farr@alaska.gov>

Subject

Rural Alaska transition to ULSD

cost assessment

Hi guys,

Here is a PDF version of the cost assessment report which was presented to you

on Thursday.

Clint(See attached file: Final Report.pdf)
April ROSS, Appellant, v. Nicholas R. TRIMBLE, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1630

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
| Exhibit 99.3 **EMC**Mortgage Corporation Officer's Certificate BSABS 2004-FR2 I, Mark D. Ehrenreich, Senior Vice President of EMC Mortgage Corporation, do hereby certify to the designated Trustee that in respect to the period ending November 30, 2004, a review of the activities of EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") during the preceding fiscal year or applicable portion thereof and it's performance under the above referenced Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision. To the best of  my knowledge, based on such review, EMC has performed and fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such obligation, specifying each such default known to such officer and the nature and status thereofexcept for such defaults as such officer in its good faith judgment believe to be immaterial. ***/s/ Mark D. Ehrenreich*Mark D. Ehrenreich, Senior Vice President *2/28/05*Date** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 13.1

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**UNDER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF1934, AS AMENDED**

Pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of CPFL Energia S.A. (the “Company”) does hereby certify,to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the yearended December 31, 2013 of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  /s/ Wilson Ferreira Junior    

Date: April  04, 2014                                                                          WilsonFerreira Junior         

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of BRAZIL GOLD CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. Sawyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: October 18,  2010








By: /s/ Phillip E Jennings





Name: Phillip E Jennings , Director, President, Secretary, Chief Operating Officer
HERITAGE LAKES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3944

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Official Journal C 27A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.027.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 27A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 551 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.027.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 27A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 551 February 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 027A/01 | European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Publication of a vacancy for a Director function (grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2012/10323 | 1 |
| 2012/C 027A/02 | European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Publication of a vacancy for a Director function (grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2012/10324 | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2012/C 027A/01

European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Publication of a vacancy for a Director function (grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2012/10323

1

2012/C 027A/02

European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Publication of a vacancy for a Director function (grade AD 14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2012/10324

5

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Robert Edward LOVELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D16-3031 2D16-3260

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
31.1



Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification



I,
Chaya Hendrick, certify that:



|   |                                                                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have
    reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2017 of SmartMetric, Inc.; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report.

|                             |  |                                                                          
|---------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:
     October 27, 2017 |  | /s/
        C. Hendrick                                                  
|                             |  | C.
        Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Dated:   September 27, 2005 | /s/   B. Steven Springrose                                               
|--------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            | B. Steven SpringroseChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

|Dated:   September 27, 2005 | /s/   Judy E. Naus                                              
|--------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                            | Judy E. NausChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Viosolar Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending July 31, 2012, and as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick Walchuk, Director, President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 7, 2013
By:
/s/ Rick WalchukName:
Rick WalchukTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and DirectorPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)