alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         470,185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,037,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,065,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,840,145
<PP&E>                                       3,850,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,383,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,181,229
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,474
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,887,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,383,230
<SALES>                                      7,464,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,464,220
<CGS>                                        4,446,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,742,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               180,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             166,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,969
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             94,969
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7130** 

MICHAEL ANGEL WHITE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, Lee Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee , and

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Respondent

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv
- 01456

- JFA )

Submitted : December 20, 2011 Decided: December 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circu it Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Angel White, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this c ircuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Angel White seeks to appeal the district

court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Su pp.
2011) . The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied

and advised White that failure to file timely objections to this
recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court
order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of sp ecific objections to a
magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve
appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
the parties have been warned of the consequences of
noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th
Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). White
has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Carol AYMOND, Jr. v. Valentina AYMOND

NO. 2018-CC-0402

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
David Lee HAWKINS, DOC #782852, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1298

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
A S S E T S

C u r r e n t a s s e t s

C a s h a n d c a s h e q

u i v a l e n t s $ 1 6 6

, 4 0 6 $ 4 9 8

, 6 8 1

A c c o u n t s r e c e i v a b l e :

O i l a n d g a s s a l e s 5 3 8

, 9 7 1 3 3 3

, 1 9 1

T r a d e 1 6

, 3 7 0 3 0

, 4 0 4

P r e p a i d c o s t s a n d e x

p e n s e s 1 9

, 2 8 1 1 6

, 7 8 2

T o t a l c u r r e n t a s s e t s 7 4 1

, 0 2 8 8 7 9

, 0 5 8

P r o p e r t y a n d e q u i p m e n t

, a t c o s t

O i l a n d g a s p r o p e r t i e s

, u s i n g t h e f u l l c o s t m e t h o d 3 4

, 3 0 9

, 3 2 8 3 1

, 8 4 0

, 0 5 9

O t h e r 9 2

, 3 2 6 7 8

, 5 2 0

3 4

, 4 0 1

, 6 5 4 3 1

, 9 1 8

, 5 7 9

L e s s a c c u m u l a t e d d e p r e c i a t i o n

, d e p l e t i o n a n d a m o r t i z a t i o n 1 7

, 3 2 3

, 6 9 2 1 6

, 2 2 3

, 2 6 7

P r o p e r t y a n d e q u i p m e n t

, n e t 1 7

, 0 7 7

, 9 6 2 1 5

, 6 9 5

, 3 1 2

O t h e r n o n c u r r e n t a s s e t s 1 1 6

, 4 5 4

-

$ 1 7

, 9 3 5

, 4 4 4 $ 1 6

, 5 7 4

, 3 7 0

L I A B I L I T I E S A N D S T O C K H O L D E R S ' E Q U I T Y

C u r r e n t l i a b i l i t i e s

A c c o u n t s p a y a b l e a n d a c c r u e d e x p e n s e s $ 4 3 1

, 8 4 8 $ 4 0 2

, 0 9 8

L o n g

- t e r m d e b t 2

, 9 5 0

, 0 0 0 1

, 7 0 0

, 0 0 0

A s s e t r e t i r e m e n t o b l i g a t i o n s 7 6 3

, 4 1 2 6 1 3

, 2 7 9

D e f e r r e d i n c o m e t a x l i a b i l i t i e s 8 5 3

, 1 9 9 8 8 4

, 7 0 3

C o m m i t m e n t s a n d c o n t i n g e n c i e s

S t o c k h o l d e r s ' e q u i t y

P r e f e r r e d s t o c k

- $ 1

. 0 0 p a r v a l

u e ;

1 0

, 0 0 0

, 0 0 0 s h a r e s a u

t h o r i z e d ; n o n e o u t s t a n d i n g

- -

C o m m o n s t o c k

- $ 0

. 5 0 p a r v a l

u e ; 4 0

, 0 0 0

, 0 0 0 s h a r e sC o m

m o n s t o c k

- $ 0

. 5 0 p a r v a l

u e ; 4 0

, 0 0 0

, 0 0 0 s h a r e s
**Exhibit
      32.2**









**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Electronics Inc. (Winland)
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn A. Kermes, Chief
      Financial Officer of Winland, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Winland.











Date:
                May 15, 2007
            /s/
                Glenn A. KermesGlenn
                A. KermesChief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") by Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Luis F. Lugo,
Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
      Registrant.






Dated:
      August 14, 2008
            /s/ Luis F.
      LugoLuis
      LugoPrincipal
      Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 72 (Thursday, April 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8672]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Call for Redemption of 12-1/2 Percent Treasury Bonds of 
2009-14

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As of April 15, 2009, the Secretary of the Treasury gives 
public notice that all outstanding 12-1/2 percent Treasury Bonds of 
2009-14 (CUSIP No. 912810 DL 9) dated August 15, 1984, due August 15, 
2014, are called for redemption at par on August 15, 2009, on which 
date interest on such bonds will cease.

DATES: Treasury calls such bonds for redemption on August 15, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Definitives Section, Customer Service 
Branch 3, Office of Retail Securities, Bureau of the Public Debt, (304) 
480-7711.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    1. Bonds Held in Registered Form. Owners of such bonds held in 
registered form should mail bonds for redemption directly to: Bureau of 
the Public Debt, Definitives Section, Customer Service Branch 3, P.O. 
Box 426, Parkersburg, WV 26106-0426. Owners of such bonds will find 
further information regarding how owners must present and surrender 
such bonds for redemption under this call, in Department of the 
Treasury Circular No. 300 dated March 4, 1973, as amended (31 CFR Part 
306); by contacting the Definitives Section, Customer Service Branch 3, 
Office of Retail Securities, Bureau of the Public Debt, telephone 
number (304) 480-7711; and by going to the Bureau of the Public Debt's 
Web site, http://www.treasurydirect.gov.
    2. Bonds Held in Book-Entry Form. Treasury automatically will make 
redemption payments for such bonds held in book-entry form, whether on 
the books of the Federal Reserve Banks or in Treasury Direct accounts, 
on August 15, 2009.

Kenneth E. Carfine,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8672 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-40-P
NUMBER 13-18-00181-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ROMUALDO GARCIA 

AND ANDREA GARCIA, Appellants,

v.

MADISON’S A/K/A MADISON'S 

ON DOWLEN AND MADISON'S 

RESTAURANTS, LP, Appellees.

On appeal from the 136th District Court

of Jefferson County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellants’ third motion for extension of time to 

file the brief.1 Appellants’ brief was originally due to be filed on May 18, 2018, and this 

 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant 

to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.). 
2

Court has previously granted appellants two extensions for the filing of appellants’ brief 

in this cause. Appellants have now filed a third motion requesting additional time to file 

the appellate brief in this cause.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellants’ third motion for 

extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in this cause, is 

of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellants’ third motion for extension of time 

to file the brief should be granted with order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor 

upon the delay caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter. 

Appellants’ third motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby GRANTED, 

and the Honorable Gabi S. Canales, counsel for appellants, is hereby ORDERED to file 

the appellate brief with this Court on or before December 17, 2018. No further 

extensions will be granted in this matter absent exigent circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

13th day of November, 2018.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2560 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain bags for toys. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain bags 

for toys. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DUTY SUSPENSION ON CERTAIN 

4 BAGS FOR TOYS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.78 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain bags for toys) is amended by striking the date in 

8 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2560 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 15, 2016 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00262-CV 

LAVERNE WILLIS, Appellant 

V. 

TEXAS ELITE COLLISION PAINT & BODY AND BRENDA ROBLES, Appellees 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-06380-E 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Myers, Stoddart, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Whitehill 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By order dated May 3, 2016, we ordered the 

appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and directed appellant to file her brief by June 2, 

2016. By postcard dated June 6, 2016, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had 

expired. We directed appellant to file both her brief and an extension motion within ten days. We 

cautioned appellant that failure to file her brief and an extension motion would result in the 

dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief, an 

extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of her brief. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 

160262F.P05 

 

/Bill Whitehill/ 

BILL WHITEHILL 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

LAVERNE WILLIS, Appellant 

No. 05-16-00262-CV V. 

TEXAS ELITE COLLISION PAINT & 

BODY AND BRENDA ROBLES, 

Appellees 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-06380-E. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. 

Justices Myers and Stoddart participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellees TEXAS ELITE COLLISION PAINT & BODY AND 

BRENDA ROBLES recover their costs of this appeal from appellant LAVERNE WILLIS. 

Judgment entered August 15, 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BROOKTROUT
TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH BROOKTROUT TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          32,549
<SECURITIES>                                     7,788
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                       572
<INVENTORY>                                      5,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,163
<PP&E>                                           6,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,823
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,221
<SALES>                                         15,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,070
<CGS>                                            6,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                       998
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
Ronnie GRAEFF v. Mitzi GRAEFF

2150583

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Diaundra JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2389

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 17, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laura Cornell Niles, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Diaundra Jones appeals her sentence for grand theft, arguing only that the trial court considered improper factors when imposing an eight-month jail sentence. But because she has not challenged her conviction-only her sentence-and because she has already served that sentence, this appeal has become moot. *See**Toomer v. State* , 895 So.2d 1256, 1256-57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) ("Where one is challenging the legality of his sentence or seeking jail credit against that sentence, and he completes the sentence during the pendency of the appeal, the appeal may be dismissed as moot."). Although Jones asserts the appeal "is not moot because a possibility exists that adverse collateral legal consequences will befall Ms. Jones," she has not articulated what those adverse collateral consequences might be, and we can conceive of none.

DISMISSED .

Wolf, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CT Holdings, (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven B. Solomon,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard Connelly, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Steven B. Solomon
---------------------
Steven B. Solomon
Chief Executive Officer
August 19, 2003


/s/ Richard Connelly
--------------------
Richard Connelly
Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2003
                                       39
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of
China Housing & Land Development, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2008as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:





i.the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





ii.       
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and will be furnished to the SEC or our staff upon request.








/s/ Feng
Xiaohong


Feng Xiaohong


Chief Executive
Officer










This Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is not“filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by
applicable rules of the Securities Exchange
Commission.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7165
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT BRUCE GILLINS, a/k/a Gary Waring, a/k/a Christopher Washington, a/k/a Kelly, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-94-163, CA-97-421-2) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Bruce Gillins, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gillins , Nos. CR-94-163; CA-97-421-2 (E.D. Va. July 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 

### Mears, Gilbert From: ronald gulla <fight848@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 11:52 PM To: Mears, Gilbert Subject: Close TRI Loophole Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 

### Docket# EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281 it is long over due that the people know about the toxins.