alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13355-000]


Middlebury Electric, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit 
Applications Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To 
Intervene, and Competing Applications

April 8, 2009.
    On January 22, 2009, Middlebury Electric, LLC, filed an 
application, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, 
proposing to study the feasibility of the Middlebury Upper East Bank 
Hydroelectric Project, to be located on Otter Creek, in Addison County, 
Vermont.
    The proposed Upper East Bank Hydroelectric Project consists of: (1) 
A refurbished abandoned mill structure including a new intake 
structure, penstock, tailrace and appurtenant facilities; (2) the 
millhouse would contain one or more turbine generating units with a 
total installed capacity of 0.4 megawatts; (3) a direct connection to 
an existing Central Vermont Public Service (CVPS) transmission line; 
and (4) appurtenant facilities. The Middlebury Upper Bank Project would 
have an estimated average annual generation of 3,400 megawatt-hours, 
which would be sold to CVPS.
    Applicant Contact: Dr. Anders Holm, 1330 Exchange Street, 
Middlebury, VT 05445, phone (802) 233-9606.
    FERC Contact: John Ramer, (202) 502-8969.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13355) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-8558 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1168 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1168

   To amend title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 
program eligibility for distance education programs offered by foreign 
                   institutions of higher education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2023

 Mr. Braun (for himself and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 
program eligibility for distance education programs offered by foreign 
                   institutions of higher education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Distance Education for 
Foreign Institutions Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFERED BY FOREIGN 
              INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

    Section 481(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1088(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
    ``(4)(A) An otherwise eligible program that is offered by a foreign 
institution and is offered in part through distance education is 
eligible for the purposes of this title if--
            ``(i) not more than 12.5 percent of such program consists 
        of courses offered principally through distance education;
            ``(ii) the foreign institution has been evaluated and 
        determined by an outside oversight entity, such as an 
        accrediting agency or association or government entity, to have 
        the capability to effectively deliver distance education 
        programs; and
            ``(iii) the students receiving aid under this title are 
        physically present in the country where the foreign institution 
        is located during the distance education instruction.
    ``(B) In calculating the percentage of a program offered through 
distance education for purposes of clause (i) of subparagraph (A), any 
course that is part of such a program that requires a student's regular 
in-person attendance for more than 50 percent of the instruction, but 
also includes one or more distance education components as part of the 
course, shall not be considered to be offered principally through 
distance education.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50011 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSUE CONTRERAS-VALDESPINO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-03-CR-466-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Josue Contreras-Valdespino appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Contreras-Valdespino contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Contreras-Valdespino United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-50011 -2- maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Contreras-Valdespino acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Marco SAYAN and Ursula Haltenhof, Appellants, v. SPACE COAST CREDIT UNION, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3925

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Shane HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ernesto HERRADA-CORDOVA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
 AIR QUALITY

Chomping down on pollution

After complaints, The Habit looks to slash its emissions



COMMENT

0

0



| 
Smoke bellows out an exhaust pipe from The Habit, a hamburger restaurant on west 

March Lane in Stockton. CALIXTRO ROMIAS/THE RECORD





By Alex Breitler

Record Staff Writer 

Posted Jan. 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM 

One of Stockton’s newest burger joints was so popular after it opened two 

years ago that the public complained about the thick fumes that periodically 

wafted from a rooftop vent into the surrounding neighborhood.

“Sometimes the place looks like it’s on fire,” one observer told The Record 

last year.

The good news is that The Habit on March Lane is experimenting with new 

technology that could take a bite out of its rush-hour pollution problem.

The restaurant was the first in the San Joaquin Valley to sign up for a new 

pilot program aimed at reducing emissions from restaurants with charbroil 

grills.

Cooking meat contributes to the Valley’s notoriously bad air. Microscopic 

specks of grease escape into the air while the meat sizzles away on the grill; 

those tiny specks add to dangerous particle pollution in nearby 

neighborhoods, just like chimney smoke does.

As of 2009, nearly 2,500 commercial charbroilers in the Valley were serving 

up more than 75,000 tons of meat each year, spewing more than 900 tons of 

pollution, according to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.

More than a decade ago, Valley air regulators began requiring restaurants 

with chain-driven charbroilers — think most fast-food restaurants — to slash 

emissions.
But restaurants such as The Habit, those with under-fired charbroilers rather 

than the chain-driven ones, were not subject to the same rules because the 

technology didn’t exist for those kinds of grills.

After a few more years of research, that’s starting to change. Earlier this year 

the air district agreed to set aside $750,000 to test some new control 

technologies for under-fired charbroilers in Valley restaurants.

In September, the air district invested $171,044 in a new scrubber and 

filtration system at The Habit. For its part, the restaurant must evaluate how 

well the controls work and submit reports to the air district.

Officials hope to fund at least three to five of these test projects across the 

Valley. They may then expand the existing rules to the under-fired 

charbroilers by 2017.

K.G. Suh of Stockton called The Record to express his concern about The 

Habit in 2014. He said at the time that he had to roll up his car window every 

time he drove by the business on March Lane, and expressed concern about 

the environmental impacts of the exhaust from the restaurant.

This week, Suh said that he was glad improvements had been made.

"I've seen the difference," Suh said. "I think (the pollution) is quite a bit 

reduced. It's great."

— Contact reporter Alex Breitler at (209) 546-8295 or 

abreitler@recordnet.com. Follow him at recordnet.com/breitlerblog and on 

Twitter @alexbreitler
Release No. 0024.09 Contact: Weldon Freeman ( 202 ) 690-1384

USDA APPROVES FIRST EVER GUARANTEED LOAN FOR COMMERCIAL - SCALE CELLULOSIC ETHANOL PLANT
F undin g f or Wood-chi p Plant Paves Wa y f or Next Generation o f Bio f

uels

WASHINGTON, Jan. 16, 2009 - Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer announced today that USDA Rural Development has approved the first ever loan guarantee to a commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol plant. The $80 million loan to Range Fuels Inc., Soperton, Ga., comes from the Section 9003 Biorefinery Assistance Progr am authorized by the 2008 Farm Bill.

"The investment in this facility - which will make cellulosic ethanol from wood chips - has the potential to significantly advance the timetable for second generation ethanol production in this country," Schafer said. "I visited the pilo t plant last October and was excited to see how well the technology works. The funding announced today helps the Bush administration fulfill its commitment to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil by developing alternative, renewable energy sources. USDA is proud to work with the private sector to lead this important breakthrough in renewable energy production."

The Biorefinery Assistance Program promot es the development of new and emerging technologies for the production of advanced biofue ls - defined as fuels that are not produced from food sources. The program provides loan gua rantees to develop, construct and retrofit viable commercial-scale biorefineries producing advanced biofuels. The maximum loan guarantee is $250 million per project. The program is designed to create energy-related jobs and economic development in rural America. The loan to Range Fuels is approved subject to conditions.

The project is expected to produce an estimated 63 jobs. When fully operational in 2010, the plant is expected to produce approximate ly 20 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol per
year.
USDA Rural Development's mission is to increase economic opportunity and improve the quality of life for rural residents. Rural Development has invested more than $111 billion since 2001 for equity and technical assistance to finance and foster growth in homeownership, business development, and critical community and technology infrastructure. More than 2 million jobs have been created or saved through these investments. Further information on rural programs is available at a local USDA Ru ral Development office or by visiting USDA Rural Develo p ment's web site at htt p ://www.rurdev.usda. g ov.

# 

### Page 1 of 1 Release No. 0024.09

1/22/2010 http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A /7_0_1RD?printable=true&contentidonly=

...
EXHIBIT 13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pharmaxis Ltd (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan D. Robertson, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 21, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Alan D. Robertson  
|                        |  |  |  | Alan D. Robertson      
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pharmaxis Ltd
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. McGarvey, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 21, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ David M. McGarvey  
|                        |  |  |  | David M. McGarvey      
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Unassociated Document
# L_2008349EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
# Official Journal C 58A/18 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 58A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6418 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 58A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6418 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2021/C 58 A/01 | Notice of open competition – EPSO/AST/148/21 — Proofreaders/Language editors (AST 3) for the following languages: Greek (EL), Spanish (ES), Estonian (ET), Irish (GA), Italian (IT) and Portuguese (PT) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2021/C 58 A/01

Notice of open competition – EPSO/AST/148/21 — Proofreaders/Language editors (AST 3) for the following languages: Greek (EL), Spanish (ES), Estonian (ET), Irish (GA), Italian (IT) and Portuguese (PT)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Charlene TAYLOR, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Issac Freeman, deceased, Appellant, v. TAMPA BAY SURGERY CENTER, LLC, a Florida Corporation; Dennis Agliano, M.D., Carlos Giammattei, M.D. Blyth Giammattei, CRNA, Jill Islip, SRNA and Anna Bernus, M.D., Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4689

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Raphael HUBBARD, DOC #R59437, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2142

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Leonardo SOCCOLICH and Mila Papic-Soccolich, Appellant, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, d/b/a Christiana Trust, not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee for Brougham Fund I Trust; Unknown Spouse of Leonardo Soccolich; Unknown Spouse of Mila Papic-Soccolich; If Living, Including Any Unknown Spouse of Said Defendant(s), If Remarried, and If Deceased, The Respective Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Creditors, Lienors, and Trustees, and All Other Persons Claiming by, through, Under or Against the Named Defendant(s); Greenbrook Village Association, Inc.; Whether Dissolved or Presently Existing, Together With Any Grantees, Assignees, Creditors, Lienors, or Trustees of Said Defendant(s) and All Other Persons Claiming by, through, Under, or Against Defendant(s); Unknown Tenant #1, n/k/a M. Sumner; Unknown Tenant #2, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-39;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and
4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LLC, a Foreign Limited Liability Company; Michael Hughes, an Individual; Jeffrey Shelton, an Individual; and Sandra Campbell, an Individual, Appellants, v. David MONTICELLO and Kimberly Monticello, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2213

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ex10-31.htm


 


Exhibit 10.31













 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  




 





 




  





5
Armando GOMEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-0913

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely  for  the  purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned  Acting  Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"),  hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form  10-QSB  of  the  Company  for  the  quarter  ended September 30, 2006 (the
"Report")  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of  the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  Company.



Date:  November  20,  2006                    /s/  Tami  J.  Story
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Tami  J.  Story
                                              Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer