alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT 11 -- STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



The following tabulation presents the calculation of primary and fully diluted
earnings per common share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 1999 and
1998.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                                               March 31,          
                                                              --------------------------------------
                                                                     1998                    1997   
                                                              --------------          --------------
<S>                                                           <C>                     <C> 
Reported net income ................................          $      586,454          $      555,283

Earnings on common shares ..........................          $      586,454          $      555,283
                                                              ==============          ==============

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic .               4,410,692               3,866,706
                                                              ==============          ==============


Earnings per common share - basic
  Income from continuing operations ................          $          .13          $          .14
                                                              ==============          ==============

  Net income .......................................          $          .13          $          .14
                                                              ==============          ==============

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted               4,520,569               3,908,781
                                                              ==============          ==============


Earnings per common share - diluted
  Income from continuing operations ................          $          .13          $          .14
                                                              ==============          ==============

  Net income .......................................          $          .13          $          .14
                                                              ==============          ==============
</TABLE>








              [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank]

                                       21
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No. 1
to the Annual Report of SmartMetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2018, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Needelman, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|Dated: May 24, 2019 | By: | /s/ Jay Needelman                           
|------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                    |     | Jay Needelman, CPA                          
|                    |     | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                    |     | (principal financial and accounting officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                            LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.
               COMPUTATIONS OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (UNAUDITED)

                              (Dollars in Millions)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,

                                                                2001           2002           2003           2004           2005
                                                             ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                                          <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
EARNINGS
        Income from continuing operations before
           minority interests and income taxes               $     66.6     $     77.8     $    116.8     $    143.8     $    139.3
        Fixed Charges, exclusive of capitalized interest           24.0           18.3           17.2           17.1           71.7
                                                             ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
           TOTAL EARNINGS                                    $     90.6     $     96.1     $    134.0     $    160.9     $    211.0
                                                             ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

FIXED CHARGES
        Interest charged to expense (a)                      $     21.8     $     15.8     $     14.4     $     13.9     $     65.6
        Interest portion of rental expense                          2.2            2.5            2.8            3.2            6.1
                                                             ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
        Fixed charges, exclusive of capitalized interest           24.0           18.3           17.2           17.1           71.7
        Capitalized interest                                        0.7            0.8            0.8            1.1            3.0
                                                             ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
           TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                               $     24.7     $     19.1     $     18.0     $     18.2     $     74.7
                                                             ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

                                                             ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
        RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                         3.67           5.03           7.44           8.84           2.82
                                                             ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

        (a) excluding interest income
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly
filing of Golden Chief Resources, Inc., a Kansas corporation (the Company), on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James W. Landrum, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

July 28, 2004

By:/s/ James W. LandrumJames W. LandrumPresident
Exhibit
32.1
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Julie Mirman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig
Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
 
 /s/
      Julie MirmanJulie
      Mirman
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                March
      31, 2009
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Masakazu Kurushima,

1. I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and we have:

(a) design such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary is, made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 25, 2007



By:

/s/ MASAKAZU KURUSHIMAMasakazu KurushimaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            3591
<SECURITIES>                                        87
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7665
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1135
<INVENTORY>                                        104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 12133
<PP&E>                                           68713
<DEPRECIATION>                                   54847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   26172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5538
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           598
<OTHER-SE>                                       20036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     26172
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6769
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    688
<INCOME-TAX>                                        14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
STATE of Louisiana v. Gregory COMEAUX

NO. 2018-KK-0390

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.
Dontrevius BYRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3724

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 20, 2018

Dontrevius Byron, Jasper, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging three grounds for relief. We find that the record does not conclusively refute part of Appellant's first *272ground for relief. As part of ground one, Appellant claims that trial counsel told him that he would not be sentenced to a longer sentence than his codefendants. Although the written plea form was attached to the postconviction court's order,1 its standard language, stating, "No person has made any promises to me that induced me to enter this plea," is insufficient to refute Appellant's claim of affirmative misadvice. "[A] general question about promises made in exchange for a plea is insufficient to refute an allegation of specific misadvice by counsel about the length of a sentence." *Collazo v. State*, 8 So.3d 1273, 1274 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (citations omitted); *see**Lamkin v. State*, 215 So.3d 640, 641 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ; *Ostane v. State*, 73 So.3d 335, 335 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we reverse the summary denial of this portion of ground one and remand for the postconviction court to either attach additional portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim or hold an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the summary denial as to the remainder of Appellant's ground one as well as grounds two and three in their entirety.

AFFIRMED in Part; REVERSED in Part, and REMANDED for Further Proceedings.

ORFINGER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

1

We note that the plea colloquy transcript was not included in the record.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2565 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain carrying cases of plastics with 

molded handles shaped to hold toys. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2012 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain carrying cases 

of plastics with molded handles shaped to hold toys. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CARRYING CASES OF PLASTICS WITH 

4 MOLDED HANDLES SHAPED TO HOLD TOYS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2565 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Carrying cases of plastics 

with molded handles (provided for in subheading 

4202.99.90), specially shaped 

or fitted to hold electronic 

drawing toys, electronic 

games or educational toys or 

devices, and books and other 

accessories used with those 

devices ................................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ACROSS THE POND (FLORENCE), INC. v. JOHNNY'S HOME RESTORATIONS

2150926

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# Official Journal C 66/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.066.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 66 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 541 March 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.066.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 66

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 541 March 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2011/C 066/01 | Opinion No 1/2011 on a proposal for a regulation of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 10th European Development Fund, as regards the European External Action Service (pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

Court of Auditors

2011/C 066/01

Opinion No 1/2011 on a proposal for a regulation of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 215/2008 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the 10th European Development Fund, as regards the European External Action Service (pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU)

(pursuant to Article 287(4), TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. TURNING LEAF-LAKELAND PROPERTIES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Imperial Lakes Land Corp., a New York Corporation; Gary L. Gregory, individually, and William G. Giarusso, individually, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-790

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Vinnette RIVERA and her Assignee National Equity Recovery Services, Inc., Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Pedro YANES a/k/a Pedro Yanes-Ramos, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-626

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jason WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2544

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
From: "Johnson, Katrina M." 

To: DioxinInteragency@EPA 

Cc: <Sarah.Bittleman >, Peter Preuss 

Date: 03/26/2010 04:52 PM 

Subject: RE: DIOXIN: Interagency Science Consultation -- Draft Response to Comments Report 

Below are USDA’s comments on EPA’s Response to “Health Risks from Dioxin and Related 

Compounds: Evaluation of the EPA Reassessment” published by the National Research Council of the 

National Academies: 

 

• USDA found the EPA response to the National Academies’ report and recommendations to be 

very thorough, well written, and well documented. The document provides the transparency and 

clarity on EPA positions that the National Academies requested. 

• USDA does not have specific comments to offer regarding EPA’s response. USDA feels the 

document is ready for independent external peer review and public review and comment as per 

EPA’s suggested plan. 

 

We are also including a copy of our journal article, a statistically based survey of dioxins and dioxin-like 

compounds in domestic meat and poultry that was conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture from 

September 2007 to September 2008. 

 

Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you. 

 

Katrina 

 

Katrina Johnson | Office of Budget and Program Analysis | Program Analyst

_________________________________________________________________________________________

US Department of Agriculture |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40381

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

FRANCISCO JAVIER CASTRO-SUAZO, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:15-CR-1097-1 

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Javier 

Castro-Suazo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castro-Suazo has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40381 Document: 00513872592 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/13/2017
No. 16-40381

2 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40381 Document: 00513872592 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/13/2017
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. ADVANCED IMAGING CONCEPTS, P.L., d/b/a Advanced Imaging Concepts, a/a/o K-Lee Keeney, Respondents.

Case No. 2D17-1345

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Lorean REAVES, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1585

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN RE: Troy J. CHARPENTIER

In re: Bradley C. Myers

NO. 2018-OB-0708

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 2018

Denied.
Lee SLOPPY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1945

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Marcus Yulvaughne WILSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4326

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.