T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n th e Ma tt e ro f: R E E D E . S L AT KIN, S ub st ant i vel y C on sol i dat ed A ff i l at es TOPS I GH T ORE GO N, I NC. a n dRE ED SLA TK I N I N V ESTM EN T CLU B, L. P. (R eorgani ze d D ebt ors) , D ebt or. DO NA L D L . S I MONS , a n dKA R E N A . S IM O N S , a. k. a K ar en R i t z, A p p el l an t s, v. R . T O D D N E I L S O N , T rus t e e s of the Ch ap t e r1 1 Ban k rup t c yEs t a t e o f Re e dE. S l a tki n, A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 55759 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 3 3 5 8 - R S WL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R ona l d S . W . L e w , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng 

# FI LED JU N 21 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 09- 55759 2 S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D on al d L . and K ar en A . S i m on s app ea l fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s order d i sm i ssi n g th ei r ap p eal fro m th e b an k rup t cy co u rt ’ s su m m ary j u d g m en tag ai n st th e m i n a n a d v e r s a ryp r o c e e d i n g . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u an tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 158( d) . W e r e vi e w f

ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on the di s m i s s a l of a n appe a l f

or f a ilu r e to p r o s e c u te , N

at ’ l B ank of L ong B e ac h v . D onov an ( I n r e D onov an) , 871 F . 2d 807, 808 ( 9th C i r . 1989) , a nd w e r e ve r s e a nd r e m and. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d is m is s e ds u as p o n te a f te rth e S im o n s e s f

a ile dto tim e ly f i l e doc um e nt s i n s upportof the i rappe a l . H ow e ve r , the S i m ons e s ha d r e que s t e d a s h o rt e x te n s io n to f

ile th e iro p e n in g b r ie f

, th e c o u rt f

a ile dto w arn o f

d is m is s a l o rto c ons i de rl e s s dr a s t i c s a nc t i ons , a nd the r e w a s no s how i ng of pr e j udi c e t o the ap p e lle e . T h u s , w e r e v e r s e a n dr e m an d . Se e i d. at80 8-09 (c on clud i ng that di sm i ss alof appeal w as an abuse of di sc re t i on w here B ankrup t cyA pp el l at e P anel fa i l ed t o con si der a l t ernat i ve sanct i on s) ; Mone y m ake rv . C oB e n (

I n r e E is e n) , 31 F . 3d 1447, 1451 ( 9th C i r . 1994) (e xp l ai ni ng fi ve fa ct ors c ou rt s m ustconsi der b efo re d i sm i ssal , i n cl u d i n g p rej u d i ce t o o p p o si n g p arty an dal t ern at i v e san ct i o n s,09- 55759 3 a n dn o tin g th a t in s u as p o n te d is m is s a ls “th e r e is ac lo s e rf o c u s o n th e f

a ilu r e to c o n s id e rle s s d r a s tic a lte rn a tiv e s an dth e la c ko f w arn in g o f

im m in e n t d is m is s a l” (i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks and ci t at i on om i tt ed)) . RE V E RS E D a n d RE MAND E D.