alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1304 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study 

on the carbon footprint and environmental impacts of electric vehicles, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. LEE, Mr. MARSHALL, 

Mr. SULLIVAN, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States 

to conduct a study on the carbon footprint and environmental impacts of electric vehicles, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Directing Independent 

5 Research To Yield Carbon Assessment Regarding Electric 

6 Vehicles Act of 2023’’ or the ‘‘DIRTY CAR EV Act of 

7 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1304 IS

1 SEC. 2. STUDY ON CARBON FOOTPRINT AND ENVIRON2 MENTAL IMPACT OF AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE 

3 ECOSYSTEM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the 

5 United States, in consultation with the Secretary of En6 ergy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protec7 tion Agency, shall conduct a study on the total carbon 

8 footprint and environmental impact of an electric vehicle 

9 ecosystem, including— 

10 (1) the production of batteries used in electric 

11 vehicles, including the mining and processing of min12 erals for those batteries; 

13 (2) the production, transmission, and distribu14 tion of electricity used to charge and power electric 

15 vehicles; and 

16 (3) all other aspects of the production, use, and 

17 disposal of electric vehicles, including all minerals 

18 necessary for, and components of, electric vehicles. 

19 (b) REQUIREMENT.—In conducting the study under 

20 subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United 

21 States shall conduct a thorough analysis of— 

22 (1) the burden on electric grids across the 

23 United States that would result from full adoption 

24 of electric vehicles in the United States; 

25 (2) the costs and implications of building out a 

26 national network of charging stations and home 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1304 IS

1 charging to support full adoption of electric vehicles 

2 in the United States; 

3 (3) ongoing costs to maintain an electric vehicle 

4 ecosystem that supports full adoption of electric ve5 hicles in the United States; and 

6 (4) the cost implications on repairing and 

7 strengthening roads and bridges. 

8 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

9 of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the 

10 United States shall submit to Congress and make publicly 

11 available a report describing the results of the study con12 ducted under subsection (a), including the analysis con13 ducted under subsection (b). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Roger RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2662

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,522]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 9, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Bernhardt Furniture Company, Corporate Office, Lenoir, North Carolina.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of March 2009

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-8294 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
formmap.htm


 


Please refernce formmap.pdf
E.W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2789

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 02, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Andre I. DUNBAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1696

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 14, 2003                   /s/ Tami J Story
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Tami J Story
                                           Acting Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 113A/13 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 113A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4813 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 113A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4813 May 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
| 2005/C 113A/1 | Notice of open competition: customer relations manager — Reference: EF 04/10 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2005/C 113A/1

Notice of open competition: customer relations manager — Reference: EF 04/10

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 113A/2 | Corrigendum to the recruitment notices for auxiliary agents and session auxiliaries (fixed-term contracts) — Luxembourg — Brussels — Strasbourg for the European Parliament ( Official Journal of the European Communities C 254 A of 13 September 2001 ) | 6 |

Corrigenda

2005/C 113A/2

Corrigendum to the recruitment notices for auxiliary agents and session auxiliaries (fixed-term contracts) — Luxembourg — Brussels — Strasbourg for the European Parliament ( Official Journal of the European Communities C 254 A of 13 September 2001 )

Official Journal of the European Communities C 254 A of 13 September 2001

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit
32.2 Section 906 CFO Certification




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Valley Commerce Bancorp (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Roy O. Estridge, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
      7, 2008
            
            
            /s/
      Roy O. EstridgeRoy
      O. Estridge
              Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Anthony Bernard SKIPPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS*I, Greg A. Tunney, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of R. G. Barry Corporation on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidatedfinancial condition and results of operations of R. G. Barry Corporation and its subsidiaries.        Date: November 9, 2006 By:  /s/ Greg A. Tunney          *    Greg A. Tunney    Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) of Newsearch, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Kenneth S. Adessky, the Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: September 13, 2007 /s/ Kenneth S. Adessky   Kenneth S. Adessky, Chief Financial Officer
Vicken BEDOYAN and WPM Miami, Inc., Petitioners, v. Harout SAMRA, Respondent.

No. 3D17-1382

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017

Gunster, and Angel A. Cortiñas and Jonathan H. Kaskel, for petitioners.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Jose M. Ferrer and Desiree Fernandez, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

SCALES, J.

In this petition for writ of certiorari, Vicken Bedoyan and WPM Miami, Inc., co-defendants below, argue that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in denying their motion for directed verdict and renewed motion for directed verdict, where the jury entered a verdict in favor of Harout Samra, the plaintiff below, on liability at a bifurcated trial.1 In light of the jury verdict, and with a trial on damages pending, Samra propounded discovery requests that the petitioners argue seek information and communications that are protected by the accountant-client privilege.2,3 Because the petitioners have not demonstrated irreparable harm that cannot be remedied in a plenary appeal following the trial on damages, *1104we lack jurisdiction to hear, and therefore dismiss, the instant petition. *See**Parkway Bank v. Fort Myers Armature Works, Inc.*, 658 So.2d 646, 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (recognizing that "a petitioner must establish that an interlocutory order creates material harm irreparable by postjudgment appeal before this court has power to determine whether the order departs from the essential requirements of the law").4

Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

1

In the liability portion of the case, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Samra finding that: (i) Samra and Bedoyan had formed a partnership in 2009; (ii) Bedoyan had breached the partnership agreement; and (iii) WPM Miami, Inc. was a partnership asset.

2

Samra initially also sought communications that the petitioners argue are protected by the attorney-client privilege. Samra has since agreed not to seek any attorney-client communications as part of his discovery efforts. Therefore, only the accountant-client privilege is at issue here.

3

It bears noting that, after the jury's verdict on liability, Bedoyan and WPM Miami, Inc. produced several hundred pages of documents from the accountant's file which, pursuant to the parties' agreed confidentiality order, may be viewed only by Samra's counsel and experts and no one else. In our view, the provisions of this agreed confidentiality order adequately protect the petitioners from the "cat out of the bag" discovery that the petitioners argue exposes them to irreparable harm. *See, e.g.*, *Bestechnologies, Inc. v. Trident Envtl. Sys., Inc.*, 681 So.2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (denying certiorari when the trial court has, in the appellate court's view, taken reasonable steps to preserve confidentiality).

4

We express no opinion as to the merits of the petitioners' claims that the trial court erred in denying their motion for directed verdict and renewed motion for directed verdict.
Scott JOHNSTONE, Appellant, v. Lisa BARRON, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1581

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 25, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Brian SEGURA

No. 2017-KP-0805

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF IBERIA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). His venue claim is repetitive, *see* La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A), and his sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state *909court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 21, 2005 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




Date:  November 21, 2005                         /s/ Tami J Story
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Tami J Story
                                                 Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### HEM, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. BEHRINGER SAWS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 03-1601, 03-1602.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 17, 2004.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 24, 2004.

*335William C. Norvell, Jr., Principal Attorney, Scott D. Marrs, Valarie J. Eissler, of Counsel, Beirne Maynard, Houston, TX, for D efendant-App ellant.

John A. Kenney, Principal Attorney, Jeff L. Todd, of Counsel, McAfee & Taft, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Cross Appellant.

Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

p0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140581 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140581 

 COA: 285886 

Van Buren CC: 07-015836-FH 

FREDERICK DEONTA WILSON a/k/a 

DEONTA FREDERICK WILSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
VMT Info 

Carlin, James to: Tim Russ 02/26/201012:46 PM 

This message has been forwarded. 

Tim the Total VMT which includes both paved and unpaved roads for 

the whole nonattainment area was 

54,877,360 per year. 

Please let me know if you get this e-mail.asit is an old email 

address, and I am curious as to why you need the 

info. 

Thanks,
STATE EX REL. Otis R. MCKINLEY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0141

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in state collateral proceedings in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
----

 

Exhibit 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A,Amendment No. 1, of Seitel, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall D. Stilley, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
Judy PERCIVAL, Petitioner, v. Karen CAPPS, et al., Respondents.

No. 3D17-1109

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 13, 2018

Judy Percival, in proper person.

Goodkind & Florio, P.A., Brian K. Goodkind and Kenneth R. Florio, for respondent ANF Miami Gardens, LLC.

Before SUAREZ, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

LINDSEY, J.

Judy Percival ("Appellant") appeals an order of the appellate division of the circuit court dismissing her appeal from a final judgment of tenant eviction in the County Court in and for Miami-Dade, County. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c) ("If a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause shall be treated as if the proper remedy had been sought; provided that it shall not be the responsibility of the court to seek the proper remedy."). We have certiorari jurisdiction to review the final order of the circuit court acting in its *43review capacity. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B).

A final judgment for tenant eviction was entered by the county court on December 20, 2016 and docketed on the clerk's docket on December 21, 2016. On January 31, 2016, Appellant filed a notice of appeal of the final judgment to the appellate division of the circuit court. On April 18, 2017, ANF Miami Gardens, LLC ("Appellee") filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that it was filed beyond the thirty days prescribed by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and was, therefore, untimely. On May 3, 2017, the appellate division of the circuit court entered an order granting the motion to dismiss. On May 15, 2017, Appellant filed a notice of appeal of that order.

Having reviewed the record, we find no departure from the essential requirements of law. *See**Boffelli v. Kent Sec. Servs.*, 175 So.3d 310 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) ; *Soro Co. Int'l v. Jones*, 89 So.3d 258, 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (denying petition for certiorari review of an order of the appellate division of the circuit court affirming a final judgment for removal of a tenant).

Petition denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138742

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138742 COA: 289107 Wayne CC: 07-011524-01 AHMAAD RASHAD GAMBLES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 27, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.