alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Jurisdiction of**   **Name of Subsidiary** **Organization**      25.  ABP IA (DES MOINES) LLC Delaware      26.  ABP IL (UNIVERSITY PARK) LLC Delaware      27.  ABP IN (ELKHART) LLC Delaware      28.  ABP KY (INDEPENDENCE) LLC Delaware      29.  ABP LA (SHREVEPORT) LLC Delaware      30.  ABP LA (BATON ROUGE) LLC Delaware      31.  ABP LA (NEW ORLEANS) LLC Delaware      32.  ABP MA (BELLINGHAM) LLC Delaware      33.  ABP MD (BALTIMORE) LLC Delaware      34.  ABP ME (PORTLAND) LLC Delaware      35.  ABP MI (DETROIT) LLC Delaware      36.  ABP MI (GRAND RAPIDS) LLC Delaware      37.  ABP MN (EAGAN) LLC Delaware      38.  ABP MN (MAPLE GROVE) LLC Delaware      39.  ABP MO (BRIDGETON) LLC Delaware      40.  ABP MO (KANSAS CITY) LLC Delaware      41.  ABP MO (SPRINGFIELD) LLC Delaware      42.  ABP MS (PEARL) LLC Delaware      43  ABP NC (BUTNER) LLC Delaware      44  ABP NC (CHARLOTTE) LLC Delaware      45  ABP NJ (DENVILLE) LLC Delaware      46  ABP NM (ALBUQUERQUE) LLC Delaware      47  ABP NY (YAPHANK) LLC Delaware      48.  ABP OH (TALMADGE) LLC Delaware      49.  ABP OK (TULSA) LLC Delaware      50.  ABP OR (BEAVERTON) LLC Delaware
 

 
           **Jurisdiction of**   **Name of Subsidiary** **Organization**      51.  ABP PA (ALLENTOWN) LLC Delaware      52.  ABP PA (STANTON) LLC Delaware      53.  ABP SC (CHARLESTON) LLC Delaware      54.  ABP SD (SIOUX FALLS) LLC Delaware      55.  ABP TN (ERWIN) LLC Delaware      56.  ABP TN (MEMPHIS) LLC Delaware      57.  ABP TN (NASHVILLE) LLC Delaware      58.  ABP TX (EL PASO) LLC Delaware      59.  ABP TX (FORT WORTH) LLC Delaware      60.  ABP TX (HARLINGEN) LLC Delaware      61.  ABP TX (HOUSTON) LLC Delaware      62.  ABP TX (LUBBOCK) LLC Delaware      63.  ABP TX (SAN ANTONIO) LLC Delaware      64.  ABP VA (RICHMOND) LLC Delaware      65.  ABP VA (VIRGINIA BEACH) LLC Delaware      66.  ABP VT (SHELBURNE) LLC Delaware      67.  ABP WA (WOODINVILLE) LLC Delaware      68.  ABP WI (WAUSAU) LLC Delaware      69.  ABP MD (BALTIMORE) SUBSIDIARY LLC Delaware      70.  BLUELINX LANDLORD AGENT LLC Delaware      71.  BLX SC (CHARLESTON) LLC Delaware
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore KNIGHTEN-EL, aka Theodore Ishaq Knighten-El, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50298.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Douglas A. Axel, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Shakti Murthy, Esq., Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, MCKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Theodore Knighten-El appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release. He asserts that a four-month detention prior to his revocation hearing deprived the district court of jurisdiction over the revocation petition, and *780violated his due process rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

We first note that, despite his release from custody, the length of Knighten-El’s supervised release term is still at issue and thus this appeal is not moot. *See United States v. Verdin,*243 F.3d 1174 (9th Cir.2001). We are not persuaded by Knight-en-El’s contention that the district court lacked jurisdiction over his revocation proceeding because of the four-month delay between his arrest and revocation hearing. His reliance on *United States v. Hill,*719 F.2d 1402 (9th Cir.1983), is misplaced. Unlike in *Hill*(a probation case), Knight-en-El’s violation was adjudicated well within the period of supervised release and, consequently, the district court retained jurisdiction over his revocation proceeding. *Cf. United States v. Neville,*985 F.2d 992 (9th Cir.1993).

Under the constitutional framework set out in *Morrissey v. Brewer,*408 U.S. 471, 488, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), *Barker v. Wingo,*407 U.S. 514, 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), and *Camacho v. White,*918 F.2d 74, 79 (9th Cir.1990), we conclude that the delay was not a violation of Knighten-El’s due process rights or Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.1. Significantly, he cannot establish that he was prejudiced by the delay.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PS Partners IV, Ltd.
(the "Partnership") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), B.
Wayne Hughes, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John Reyes, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/  B.Wayne Hughes
-------------------
Name:    B. Wayne Hughes
Title:   Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    August 14, 2002

/s/  John Reyes
-------------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    August 14, 2002


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
James COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4121

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Muntaz MAJEED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1032

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000392

28-JUN-2019

11:42 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 124 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 124

 To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems and for 
   prevailing rate employees by 8.7 percent, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2023

  Mr. Schatz (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Padilla, Ms. Warren, Mr. 
Fetterman, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
Cardin, Mr. Casey, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Brown, Mr. Lujan, Mr. Heinrich, 
and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems and for 
   prevailing rate employees by 8.7 percent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Adjustment of Income Rates 
Act'' or the ``FAIR Act''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO RATES OF PAY.

    (a) Statutory Pay Systems.--For calendar year 2024, the percentage 
adjustment under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code, in the 
rates of basic pay under the statutory pay systems (as defined in 
section 5302 of title 5, United States Code) shall be 4.7 percent.
    (b) Prevailing Rate Employees.--Notwithstanding the wage survey 
requirements under section 5343(b) of title 5, United States Code, for 
fiscal year 2024, the rates of basic pay (as in effect on the last day 
of fiscal year 2023 under section 5343(a) of such title) for prevailing 
rate employees in each wage area and the rates of basic pay under 
sections 5348 and 5349 of such title shall be increased by 4.7 percent.

SEC. 3. ADJUSTMENT TO LOCALITY PAY.

    For calendar year 2024, the percentage adjustment under section 
5304 of title 5, United States Code, shall be an increase of 4.0 
percent.
                                 <all>
```
Donald D. BOWSER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1901

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00901]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  9:30 a.m., Tuesday, February 6, 2018

PLACE:  NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 
20594

STATUS:  The one item is open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

57381..................................  Special Investigation Report:
                                          End-of-Track Collisions at
                                          Terminal Stations, Hoboken,
                                          New Jersey, September 29,
                                          2016, and Atlantic Terminal,
                                          Brooklyn, New York, January 4,
                                          2017.
 


NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:  Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour 
prior to the meeting for set up and seating.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact 
Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314-6305 or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f2d101c171a13131a51321c3c1e1313160c0b1a0d3f110b0c1d51181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="71231e1219141d1d145f3c1232101d1d1802051403311f0502135f161e07">[email protected]</span></a> by Wednesday, January 25, 2018.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
www.ntsb.gov.
    Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also 
available at www.ntsb.gov.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:  Candi Bing at (202) 314-6403 or by email 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b7972757c785b756f6879357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d5f54535a5e7d53494e5f135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR MEDIA INFORMATION CONTACT:  Eric Weiss at (202) 314-6100 or by 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc998e959fd28b99958f8fbc92888f9ed29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2247504b410c55474b5151624c5651400c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 16, 2018.
Candi R. Bing,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-00901 Filed 1-16-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 7533-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Alvin D. HOWARD, as a known heir of the Estate of Alphonso Howard, deceased, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees of Alphonso Howard, deceased; Anthony Howard, a/k/a Anthony C. Howard, as a known heir of the Estate of Alphonso Howard, deceased; Kanesha Howard, as a known heir of the Estate of Alphonso Howard, deceased; Trevion Howard, a minor, as a known heir of the Estate of Alphonso Howard, deceased; Bettie Newmon; Unknown Tenants/ Owners # 2, n/k/a Kamoria Shareef, and Unknown Tenants/ Owners n/k/a Ahmed Shareef, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-321

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6763

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH B. SHUMATE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-98-35, CA-99-212-7)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph B. Shumate, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Shumate, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Shumate, Nos. CR-98-

35; CA-99-212-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 31, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2426 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-toluenesulfonamide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-toluenesulfonamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-TOLUENESULFONAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 p-Toluenesulfonamide (CAS 

No. 70–55–3) (provided for 

in subheading 2935.00.95) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2426 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Joe Andrew KUMLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7326

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KELLY EDWARD WADFORD, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior 

District Judge. (2:06-cr-01294-PMD-1; 2:11-cv-70012-PMD)

Submitted: March 20, 2012 Decided: March 28, 2012

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelly Edward Wadford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eric John Klumb, 

Nathan S. Williams, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kelly Edward Wadford, Jr., seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Wadford has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-41 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName:
    Nancy H. ForteTitle:
    Assistant Vice President Date: March 29, 2005
**Exhibit 3.1a**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT****OF THE****CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION****OF****SUPCOR, INC.****UNDER SECTION 242 OF THE****CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE**

**SUPCOR, INC.** (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST:  That the Board of Directors of said corporation, by written consent filed with the minutes of the Board, adopted the following resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the following amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation:

> 
“1.        That Article FIRST of the Certificate of Incorporation be amended and, as amended, read as follows:				‘FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is SHINECO, INC.’ ”

SECOND:  That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

THIRD:  Prompt notice of the taking of this corporate action is being given to all stockholders who did not consent in writing, in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by Yuying Zhang, its President, this 18th day of May 2005.			                                                                                                      SUPCOR, INC.

                                                                                                      By:       /s/ Yuying Zhang, President                                                                                                                       Yuying Zhang, President

----
Joshua DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3153

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

###### Information Security Oversight Office

          - [NARA-2018-017]

# AGENCY:

Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

# ACTION:

Notice of advisory committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

NARA announces the following committee meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on March 14, 2018, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

National Archives and Records Administration; 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Archivist's Reception Room, Room 105; Washington, DC 20408.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert Tringali, Program Analyst, by mail at ISOO; National Archives Building; 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20408, by telephone at (202) 357-5335, or by email at                         *robert.tringali@nara.gov.*                         Contact ISOO at                         *ISOO@nara.gov*                         and the NISPPAC at                         *NISPPAC@nara.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss National Industrial Security Program policy matters. This announcement is in accord with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101-6. This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, you must submit the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Friday, March 9. ISOO will provide additional instructions for gaining access to the meeting.

Patrice Little Murray,

Alternate Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-00791 Filed 1-17-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7515-01-P