alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         13,384
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            451
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                4,212
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   110,748
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         44,170
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           43,142
<LOANS>                                       181,638
<ALLOWANCE>                                     2,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                366,730
<DEPOSITS>                                    295,525
<SHORT-TERM>                                   13,701
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,796
<LONG-TERM>                                    25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,800
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                366,730
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                10,880
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               7,362
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  175
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               18,417
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              7,490
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              8,844
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           9,578
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                156
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 7,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,136
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      3,200
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                      2.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.03
<LOANS-NON>                                       450
<LOANS-PAST>                                        6
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 3,419
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                3,196
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     262
<RECOVERIES>                                       11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,945
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            2,945
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           606


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES WATSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 55 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 14, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior 
Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Independent Bank Group, Inc., McKinney, Texas; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Integrity Bancshares, Inc., and 
indirectly acquire shares of Integrity Bank, SSB, both of Houston, 
Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 16, 
2018.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-00948 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2443 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2443

        To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium ferrocyanide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium ferrocyanide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM FERROCYANIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Sodium              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        ferrocyanide (CAS                                                  31/2015.......
                        No. 13601-19-9)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2837.20.51)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Pharmasset, Inc. (the Company) for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, P. Schaefer Price, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|Date: December 11, 2008 
|                        
|/s/    P. SCHAEFER PRICE
|P. Schaefer Price       
|Chief Executive Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pharmasset, Inc. and will be retained by Pharmasset, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Clifton R. BEAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3433

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, Lindsey Alley, Chief Financial Officer of Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10- K/A for the annual period ended March 31, 2016 (the "Report") that, to the best of his knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 28, 2016/s/ J. Lindsey AlleyJ. Lindsey AlleyChief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF OFFICERS


PURSUANT
      TO 18 USC SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE


SARBANES
      - OXLEY


ACT
      OF
      2002





I,
      John
      A. Dugan, Chairman and Director (the "principal executive officer") of SFG Financial
      Corporation (the "Registrant") certify that to the best of my knowledge,
      based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ended accompanying this Certification, of the Registrant (the
      "Report");





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934,as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.





**SFG
              FINANCIAL CORPORATION**Date: January
              23, 2007
            By:
            /s/ John
              A.
              DuganJohn
              A. DuganChairman/CEO
              and
              Director
# Official Journal C 130A/23 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 130A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6523 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 130A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6523 March 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2022/C 130 A/01 | Call for applications | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Court of Justice

2022/C 130 A/01

Call for applications

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

499 

KA 12-01267 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ARMANDO R. TORRES, ALSO KNOWN AS “MONDO,” 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KRISTIN M. PREVE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A.

DiTullio, J.), rendered June 28, 2012. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him,

upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §

160.15 [3]). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court

abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea

without a hearing (see People v Merritt, 115 AD3d 1250, 1250-1251; see

generally People v Mitchell, 21 NY3d 964, 966). Defendant’s belated

and unsupported claims of innocence and coercion were insufficient to

justify a hearing (see People v Sparcino, 78 AD3d 1508, 1509, lv

denied 16 NY3d 746). We reject defendant’s further contention that

his plea was jurisdictionally defective. Defendant pleaded guilty to

the crime charged in the indictment (cf. People v Castillo, 8 NY3d

959, 960-961) and, by his guilty plea, defendant forfeited any

challenge to the alleged amendment of the indictment (see People v

Martinez, 52 AD3d 68, 71, lv denied 11 NY3d 791). Defendant’s valid

waiver of the right to appeal precludes review of the factual

sufficiency of the plea allocution and forecloses defendant’s

challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Talley, 112

AD3d 1347, 1347; People v Nash, 38 AD3d 684, 684, lv denied 9 NY3d

848). While defendant’s contention that his plea was not voluntary

survives the waiver of the right to appeal and was preserved by his

motion to withdraw his plea, we conclude that the contention is

without merit inasmuch as it is belied by the record 
-2- 499 

KA 12-01267 

(see Merritt, 115 AD3d at 1251). 

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
James E. BAUMANN and Debora K. Baumann, Appellants, v. PNC BANK, N.A., Successor in Interest to National City Real Estate Services, LLC., Successor By Merger To National City Mortgage, Inc., f/k/a National City Mortgage Co., d/b/a Commonwealth, etc., Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1934

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.1 -- Annual Statement of Compliance

  National City			National City Mortgage Co.
   Mortgage			A subsidiary of National City Bank of Indiana
				3232 Newmark Drive Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
				Telephone: (937) 910-1200

				Mailing Address:
				P.O. Box 1820
				Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820





                           STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

		   Cititgroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc.,
      		 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-NCM2
I, T. Jackson Case, Jr., hereby certify that I am a duly appointed Executive
Vice President of National City Mortgage Co. (the "Master Servicer"),
and further certify as follows:

1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2004, (the "Agreement"), among
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc., as depositor, the Master Servicer,
as master servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

2. I have reviewed the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
year and the Master Servicer's performance under the Agreement and to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the year.

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth
in the Agreement.


Dated: March 8, 2005


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of March 8, 2005.


						By: /s/ T. Jackson Case, Jr.
						Name: T. Jackson Case, Jr.
						Title: Executive Vice President

I, Dino Camomot, a (an) Asst Sec'y of the Master Servicer, hereby certify that
T. Jackson Case, Jr. is a duly elected, qualified, and acting Executive Vice
President of the Master Servicer and that the signature appearing above is
his/her genuine signature.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of March 8, 2005.

						By: /s/ Dino Camomot
						Name: Dino R. Camomot
						Title: Ass't Secretary
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Achaogen, Inc.; and |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |
| Date: April 13, 2015                              |
|                                              |
| /s/ Derek A. Bertocci                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                           |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)      |
Kevin Leon TURNER, DOC #470117, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-309

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Wilson MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1106

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jamir W. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3143

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1086 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1086

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
  individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2023

 Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Casey, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. 
   Duckworth, Ms. Warren, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Smith, and Ms. 
  Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
  individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of disability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disability and Age in Jury Service 
Nondiscrimination Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT OF DISABILITY.

    (a) Discrimination Prohibited.--Section 1862 of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting ``disability, age,'' after 
``origin,''.
    (b) Qualifications for Jury Service.--Section 1865 of title 28, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting ``that cannot be 
        reasonably accommodated'' after ``infirmity''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) No person may be disqualified from serving on grand and petit 
juries in the district court under paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection 
(b) on account of disability if the person would be qualified under 
such paragraph (2) or (3) by reasonable accommodation.''.
                                 <all>
```
March, 22, 2011 

Mr. Mike Haley 

Sheriff 

Washoe County Sheriff’s Office 

911 Parr Boulevard 

Reno, NV 89512 

Dear Mr. Haley: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 61.118 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot 

process your request and tells you what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your January 5, 2011, exemption request for Washoe County Sheriff’s Office into 

the public docket (No. FAA-2000-8182), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. 

You have requested an extension and amendment to Exemption No. 6836. However, that 

exemption expired on October 27, 2000. The last exemption you held for the same request 

was Exemption No. 7473A, and it expired on March 31, 2005. Therefore, you will need to 

submit a new exemption request. The information you send should comply with the 

requirements of 14 CFR § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

Since your last request, § 61.118 has been re-designated as § 61.113. When drafting your new 

request, you should review § 61.113(e) to the extent necessary. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without further notice. If 

you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 13
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: September 15, 2008
    /s/ Alan D. RobertsonAlan D. RobertsonChief Executive Officer




---



##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: September 15, 2008
    /s/ David M. McGarveyDavid M. McGarveyChief Financial Officer