alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)






In connection with the quarterly filing of American Resource Technologies, Inc., a Kansas corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, M. H. McIlvain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:




(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






October 29, 2010




By: /s/ M. H. McIlvain


M. H. McIlvain


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**Certifications
      Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-QSB of TouchStone Software Corporation for the period ended September
      30, 2007 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission as of the date hereof
      (the “Report”),
      I, Jason K.
      Raza, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Michelle Carrozzella,
      Accounting Manager of TouchStone Software Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1                 The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.                 The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
      the financialcondition and results of operations of TouchStone Software
      Corporation








Date: 
                November 14, 2007
            By:
                /s/ Jason K. Raza
              President
                and Chief Executive
                OfficerDate:  
                November 14, 2007
            By:
                /s/ Michelle L. Carrozzella
              Accounting
                Manager










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      documentation authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that appears in the typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by the Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
      will
      be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification “accompanies”
      the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
      or
      the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
      the
      date of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, irrespective of a general
      incorporation language contained in such filings).
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the quarterly report
of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry F. Vance, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) This Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and
results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      April 21, 2008
            /s/ Larry F. VanceLarry F.
    VanceChief Executive
      Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7718
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HENRY SMALLS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-288-2, CA-94-3508-2-8) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Smalls, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin A. Hagood, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smalls , Nos.CR-91-288-2; CA-94-3508-2-8 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for counsel and dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1255 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a public airport in use 

by an air reserve station as a primary airport. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2023 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VANCE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a public 

airport in use by an air reserve station as a primary airport. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRIMARY AIRPORT DESIGNATION. 

4 Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(K) PUBLIC AIRPORTS WITH MILITARY

7 USE.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

8 law, a public airport in use by an air reserve 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1255 IS

1 station shall be considered a primary airport for 

2 purposes of this chapter.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 10.18


 





 


October 8, 2021


 


Board of Directors


Tenon Medical, Inc.


 


Dear Board of Directors,


 


I hereby accept my election to the Board of Directors
of Tenon Medical, Inc. (the “Company"), which is effective on the date Tenon Medical's common stock is first listed
on Nasdaq. I hereby consent to being named in the Company's registration statement and the inclusion of any of my biographical
and other information required to be included therein pursuant to federal securities laws.


 


Sincerely,


 


	/s/ Frank Fischer	 
	Frank Fischer	 


 


104 Cooper Court | Los Gatos, CA | 95032
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sound Revolution Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended February 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Penny Green, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By: /s/Penny
Green


Penny
Green


President, Chief
Executive Officer


And Chief Financial
Officer


May 29,
2009
Rodney Darrell WHIDDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2822

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,800
<PP&E>                                          23,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,788)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,143
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,411
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,076
<SALES>                                          1,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,178
<CGS>                                              954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    244
<INCOME-TAX>                                        92
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-327-CR

JOHN MCGEE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court convicted Appellant John

McGee upon his plea of guilty to the offense of unauthorized use of a motor

vehicle and sentenced him to 345 days’ confinement in the State Jail Division

of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant did not file a motion for

new trial, but he filed his notice of appeal more than two months after sentence
2... See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1) (providing that notice of appeal must

be filed within thirty days of sentencing).

3... See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

4... Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

5... Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

2

was imposed; thus, his notice of appeal was untimely.2 Additionally, the trial

court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargain case, that Appellant has

no right to appeal, and that he has waived the right of appeal.3

Accordingly, we informed Appellant’s appointed counsel by letter on

September 19, 2008 that this appeal was subject to dismissal unless Appellant

or any party showed grounds for continuing it on or before September 29,

2008. Appellant’s counsel did not respond, and Appellant’s pro se response

admits that his attorney filed the notice of appeal late.

A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is

essential to vest this court with jurisdiction.4 The Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals has expressly held that, without a timely filed notice of appeal or

motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal.5
6... See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 43.2(f).

3

Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss this

case for want of jurisdiction.6

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 20, 2008
Filed 4/25/14 P. v. Vasquez CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8. 1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

LUCIO VASQUEZ,

Defen dant and Appellant. F066174

(Super. Ct. No. CF96601054)

OPINION

THE COURT *

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Houry A.

Sanderson, Judge.

Carol Foster, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appell ant.

Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and

Respondent.

- ooOoo

-

* Before Levy, Acting P.J., Cornell, J., and Peña, J.2

Appellant, Lucio Vasquez, ap peals from the court’s denial of his motion to vacate

judgment. Following independent review of the record pursuant to Peop le v. Wende

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436

, we affirm.

FAC T UAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 18, 1996, an officer stopped the car Vasquez was driv ing because

Vasquez was p laying music too loud ly . During the stop

, the officer discovered a golf ball

size pac kage containing methamphetamine weighing 19.7 grams in Vasquez’s jacket or

shirt pocket.

On January 7, 1997, Vasquez pled guilty to possession for sale of

methamphetamine . (Health & Saf. Code , § 11378. )

On March 2 6 , 199 7 , he was sentenced to a suspe nded sentence of two years and

placed on probation for three years.

Vasquez had been a lawful permanent resident since March 3, 1993. In November

2010, Vasquez consulted with an attorney for assistance in becoming a United States

citizen and learned fo r the first time that his possession for sale conviction made him

ineligible to do so.

On September 14, 2011, Vasquez hired Attorney Roger Litman to help him set

aside his plea in that matter.

On August 3 , 2012, Litman filed a motion to vacate Vasquez’ s 1997 plea alleging,

in pertinent part, that Vasquez’s defense counsel never advised him of the immigration

consequences of his plea or go over the change of plea form with him.

At a hearing on September 1 9, 2012, the court denied the motion.

Vasquez ’s appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with

citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the

record. ( People v. Wende

, supra , 25 Cal.3d 436.) Vasquez has not responded to this

court’s invitation to submit additional briefing.3

Following an independent review of the record we find that no reasonably

arguable factual or legal issues exist.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.
Anthony JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1676

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jose Luis HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. HIALEAH SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees.

No. 1D17-141

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 20, 2018

Mark L. Zientz of Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Eduardo E. Neret of Neret, Finlay & Nguyen, LLP, Miami, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

Jose Luis Hernandez, a workers' compensation claimant, was prescribed certain spinal-injection treatments. His employer authorized the treatment, but insisted that another physician-not Hernandez's treating *419physician-perform them. The Judge of Compensation Claims sided with the employer, and Hernandez appeals.

Section 440.13(2)(d) allows the employer "to transfer the care of an injured employee from the attending health care provider if an independent medical examination determines that the employee is not making appropriate progress in recuperation." Here, the employer did not satisfy the statute's requirements. Instead, the employer refused to allow Hernandez's authorized physician to perform authorized treatments, a refusal "amount[ing] to a *de facto* deauthorization of the doctor." *Williams v. Triple J Enters.* , 650 So.2d 1114, 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Osterhaus and Winsor, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation

1920 Hutton Court, Suite 300

Farmers Branch, Texas 75234

 

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-197355, 333-189258, 333-139210, 333-145855 and 333-176326) ofIronclad Performance Wear Corporation of our report dated March 17, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements forthe year ended December 31, 2013, which appear in this Form 10-K.

 

/s/ EFP Rptenberg, LLP

EFP Rotenberg, LLP

Rochester, New York

March 16, 2015
Julio GARCIA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Pilar RIVERA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2608

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
   In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”) by Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Luis F.
Lugo, Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify
that:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
      Registrant.
   Dated:
      February 17, 2008
              /s/ Luis F.
      LugoLuis
      LugoPrincipal
      Executive Officer
## PRD Label Data Report: Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in Registration Review **Work Planning**

Butralin (106501)**F o** **o d** **( F** **) /** **N o** **n -** **f o** **o d** 

**Use Site Formulation Desc**  **A. I. Max App Rate/App**  **Max # Apps /**

**CC A. I. Max** 

**App Rate/CC**  **Max #**

**Apps / Year**  **A. I. Max App**

**Rate/Year Minimum** 

**Retreatment Interval**  **Minimum**

**Reentry Interval**  **PGI / PHI / PSI Allow Geo Restrictions**  **DisAllow Geo Restrictions**  **Limitations** 

### Current As Of Date : 05/22/2012



### Note: This is an aggregate report of registered uses for this chemical. Label data for chemicals with more than one pesticide product are presented in aggregate form (i.e. each line of data may be a combination of data from one or more pesticide).

**Use Site Formulation Desc**  **Rate/App CC**  **Rate/CC Year**  **Rate/Year Interval**  **Interval PGI / PHI / PSI**  **Allow Geo Restrictions Restrictions**  **Limitations**

N TOBACCO EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATE .0002 lb / plant 1 NS NS NS NS 12 hr H01(7) No Restrictions No Restrictions C46 || CAU || CDC || CPE || CW J || CW K || CW L || CW T || CW V

N TOBACCO EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATE 3 lb / a 1 NS NS NS NS 12 hr H01(7) No Restrictions No Restrictions C46 || CAU || CDC || CPE || CW J || CW K || CW L || CW T || CW V

**Limitation Code**  **Limitation Description** C (46) Do not apply through any type of irrigation system. C (AU) Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas below C (DC) Do not apply when drift is likely to occur. C (PE) PPE (Protective Personal Equipment) language is found on the label. Please see issues report to read

Each row of this report is determined by the unique combination of the food/nonfood indicator, use site, formulation, and maximum application rate per application (key columns). The remaining, non-key columns of the report display either worse case or aggregate data from the label information that defines the unique data row. Note that each non-key column does not necessarily relate to any other non-key column with in the same row. C (W T) Do not contaminate water intended for irrigation or domestic purposes. C (W J) This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.

C (W V) Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste. H (01) __ day(s) preharvest interval. C (W K) This product is toxic to fish. C (W L) Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.



### NS= Not Specified

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**          In connection with the quarterly report of Landmark Land Company, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joe V. Olree, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.     May 12, 2006 /s/ JOE V. OLREE     Joe V. Olree    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Landmark Land Company, Inc.
Anthony GILGREASE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-58

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.