alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Philadelphia  Mortgage  Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending January 31, 2005, as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"),  We,  Quinton  Hamilton,   President  and  director  and  Shane  Kirk,
Secretary,  Treasurer and director of the  Registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


By/S/ Quinton Hamilton
-----------------
Quinton Hamilton
President and Director
Dated this 21st day of April, 2005


By/S/ Shane Kirk
-----------------
Shane Kirk
Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Dated this 21st day of April, 2005
EXHIBIT
      31





CERTIFICATION


SECTION
      1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      302 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY


ACT
      OF
      2002








I,
      John
      A. Dugan, CEO, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SFG Financial Corporation
      (the "Registrant");





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
      included in this Quarterly Report fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, and results of operations of the Registrant as of,
      and
      for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.





4.
      I am
      are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:





a)
      Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to insure that material
      information relating to the Registrant is made known to us, particularly
      during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;





b)
      Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      Quarterly Report the (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
      Presented
      in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
      as of the Evaluation Date;





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors
      and the Registrant's board of directors:





a)
      All
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
      for the auditor's any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and





b)
      Any fraud,
      whether or not material, that involves management or others who
      have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and





6.
      The
      Registrant's other director and I have indicated in this Quarterly Report whether
      or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
      that could significantly affect changes in internal controls subsequent to
      the
      date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
      to
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




**SFG
              FINANCIAL CORPORATION**Date: January
              23, 2007
            By:
            /s/ John
              A.
              DuganJohn
              A. DuganChairman/CEO,
              Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7244

MICHAEL LEE BAKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-00430-CCB)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Lee Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Lee Baker seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Baker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8282]



[[Page 16895]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,259]


Chemical Coatings, Incorporated, Hudson, NC; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 17, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by company official on behalf of workers of Chemical 
Coatings, Incorporated, Hudson, North Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of March, 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8282 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 17504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1827-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


New York; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York (FEMA-1827-DR), dated March 4, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: March 24, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New York is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of March 4, 2009.

    Albany, Columbia, Delaware, Greene, Rensselaer, Saratoga, 
Schenectady, Schoharie, and Washington Counties for Public 
Assistance [Category E] (already designated for Categories A, B, C, 
F, and G), including direct Federal Assistance, under the Public 
Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.


Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E9-8547 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year end December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Frank R. Bauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Frank R. Bauer
-----------------------------
Frank R. Bauer
Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2006


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Proguard Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Norman Becker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Norman Becker
-----------------------------
Norman Becker
Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2006
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

^225)II-E-185 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM Sheet 225 of 264 
P.2 

08/31/88 MON 14:45 FAX 360 696 0055_ 

GLV .Layalleji 

1^)001 

_uuz 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

Contact Report 

Shawn McKee, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

August 27,1998 

Ms. Sandy Brackins 

GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (360) 696-2588 

Fax Number: (360) 696-0055 

Contact Summary: 

Ms. Sandy Bracldns was contacted on behalf of the U.S. EPA to provide information about 

potential indirect costs associated with changing resins. In response to my questions Ms, Brackins 

indicated thti following: 

GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. has changed the resin they use in most of their corrosion 

resistant processes to a vinyl ester resin with a styrene content of 34%. The resin that they had 

previously used was a vinyl ester resin with a styrene content of 43%. GL&V LaV alley Industries, 

Inc. uses nearly 200,000 pounds of resin per year in the production of corrosion resistant products. 

The increase in cost for the new resin of slightly less than $0.25 per pound adds; approximately 

$40,000 per year in material costs. 

When GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. began using the new resin, they incurred some costs 

due to added waste and rejects during the first couple of weeks. Their employees required some 

minor retraining, but once they had become comfortable with the new resin, products required a 

comparable amount of labor to produce. GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. did not incur any costs 

from testing the resin. Their resin supplier, Ashland Chemical Company, preformed extensive 

testing on the new resin to ensure mat it would perform above the level of the old resin. They found 

that the new iresin outperformed the old resin with regard to corrosiveness, thus GL&V LaValley 

Industries, Inc.'s corrosive resistant products did not require recertification. 

In addition to internal education, GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. also found that their 

customers needed some reassurance and education about the new resin to become comfortable with 

the change. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE^/** *M- fo>Asku>Ld) 

08/31/98 MON 14:21 [TI/RX NO 7383) _002
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Electronics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jennifer A. Thompson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 6, 2002



| | /s/ Jennifer A. Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------

6
# Official Journal L 157/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.157.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 157 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5219 June 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.157.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 157

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5219 June 2009

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | European Parliament |
| | | 2009/456/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Final adoption of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2009 | 1 |
| | | 2009/457/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Final adoption of amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2009 | 21 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

BUDGETS

European Parliament

2009/456/EC, Euratom

*

Final adoption of amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2009

1

2009/457/EC, Euratom

*

Final adoption of amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2009

21

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to the final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 (OJ L 69, 13.3.2009) | 67 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to the final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 (OJ L 69, 13.3.2009)

(OJ L 69, 13.3.2009)

67

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euros unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 342/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.342.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 342 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5618 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.342.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 342

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5618 December 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1319/2013 of 9 December 2013 amending annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1319/2013 of 9 December 2013 amending annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Altherio SHARPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1976

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document

Exhibit 10.428




SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
 
On December 9, 2021, the Board of Directors (Board) approved increases to annual cash retainers for committee chairs and members effective January 1, 2022.  They also approved an increase in the annual equity grant portion of the non-employee director compensation program, subject to stockholder approval at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Cash Retainers


The Board approved a $10,000 increase in the annual cash retainer for the chairs of the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee and a $5,000 increase in the annual cash retainer for each other member of these committees.  They also approved a $20,000 increase in the annual cash retainer for the chair of the Compensation Committee and a $5,000 increase in the annual cash retainer for each other member of the Compensation Committee.  The Board also approved a $25,000 increase in the annual cash retainer for the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and a $5,000 increase in the annual cash retainer for each other member of this committee.


Each non-employee director receives an annual cash retainer in the amount of $100,000.  With the increases approved on December 9, 2021, the chairs of each Board committee receive an annual cash retainer of $50,000.  The other members of the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee each receive an annual cash retainer of $20,000.  The other members of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee each receive an annual cash retainer of $15,000.  


There are no fees paid for attendance at board or committee meetings. The Board retains the discretion to establish special committees in the future and to pay a special retainer to the chair and the members of any such special committee.


Equity Grants


The Board approved a $30,000 increase in the annual equity grants for non-employee directors, subject to stockholder approval of the 2022 Stock Incentive Plan at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  With this $30,000 increase, each non-employee director will receive an annual equity grant under the 2022 Stock Incentive Plan with an aggregate value of $215,000.  The equity grants will be 40% in stock options and 60% in restricted stock units.   Equity grants vest 25% on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of grant and the remaining 50% on the third anniversary of the date of grant.  In the event a new non-employee director is elected to the Board during the year, a pro-rata cash retainer amount with the same ratio between cash retainers and equity grants is granted to that individual.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1390 

To repeal the sunset provision of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. HAGERTY, and 

Ms. ROSEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the sunset provision of the Iran Sanctions Act 

of 1996, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Solidify Iran Sanctions 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) The Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public 

9 Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) requires the 

10 imposition of sanctions with respect to Iran’s illicit 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1390 IS

1 weapons programs, conventional weapons and bal2 listic missile development, and support for terrorism, 

3 including Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps. 

4 (2) The Government of Iran has acquired de5 stabilizing conventional weapons systems from the 

6 Russian Federation and other malign actors, and is 

7 funneling weapons and financial support to its ter8 rorist proxies throughout the Middle East, threat9 ening allies and partners of the United States, such 

10 as Israel. 

11 SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY. 

12 It is the policy of the United States to fully imple13 ment and enforce the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public 

14 Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note). 

15 SEC. 4. REPEAL OF SUNSET. 

16 Section 13 of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public 

17 Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended— 

18 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘; SUN19 SET’’; 

20 (2) by striking ‘‘(a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—’’; and 

21 (3) by striking subsection (b). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB