alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1316 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1316

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to expand the definition of an 
active duty military consumer for purposes of certain credit monitoring 
                 requirements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CREDIT MONITORING.

    The Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 605A(k) (15 U.S.C. 1681c-1(k))--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                    ``(A) Armed forces.--The term `armed forces' has 
                the meaning given the term in section 101(a) of title 
                10, United States Code.
                    ``(B) Armed forces member consumer.--The term 
                `armed forces member consumer' means a consumer who, 
                regardless of duty status, is a member of the armed 
                forces.''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ``active duty 
                military consumer'' and inserting ``armed forces member 
                consumer''; and
            (2) in section 625(b)(1)(K) (15 U.S.C. 1681t(b)(1)(K)), by 
        striking ``active duty military consumers'' and inserting 
        ``armed forces member consumers''.

            Passed the Senate November 13, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1316

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to expand the definition of an 
active duty military consumer for purposes of certain credit monitoring 
                 requirements, and for other purposes.
```
STATE of Louisiana v. Robert N. GREEN

NO. 2017-KO-1348

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G.  Lehmann,  a First Vice  President of  Washington  Mutual  Mortgage
Securities Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-AR11;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and
the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 29, 2005

                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     First Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William F. Webster, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lakeside
Financial Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:     March 30, 2005                 /S/ William F. Webster
                                          ------------------------------
                                          William F. Webster,
                                          President of Manager
                                          Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          61,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,511,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,407,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,271,517
<PP&E>                                       4,651,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,511,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,417,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,241
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,610,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,511,175
<SALES>                                      2,554,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,554,618
<CGS>                                        1,779,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,181,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               104,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (511,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (511,864)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (511,864)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T OS C ARC OL UN GA - GU Z MAN, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74756 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 266- 406 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry13, 2013 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an dM U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. O s c a rC ol unga - G uz m a n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

r om the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) deci si on denyi ng cancel l at i on of re m ov al b ec au se h e f

ailed to d em o n stra te g o o dm o ra l ch ar ac ter. A ll o f C o lu n g a- G u zm an ’s 

# FI LED FEB 21 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

arg u m en t s rel at e t o h i s att em p tt o i n v o k e th e F i fth A m en d m en tp ri v i l eg e ag ai n st se l f- i ncri m i nat i on w hen q uest i on ed before the Im m i grat i on Judg e ( “ IJ ”) abou tan a rr e s t. C ol unga - G uz m a n f i r s tc ont e nds tha tthe B I A vi ol a t e d hi s F i f th A m e ndm e nt pr i vi l e ge byuphol di ng the I J ’ s a dve r s e i nf e r e nc e dr a w n f

r om the i nvoc a t i on. T he B IA m ayperm i ss i bl y draw such an adverse i nfer ence fr om a non ci t i ze n’ s s i l ence , e ve n i f tha ts i l e nc e w a s the r e s ul tof apr ope ri nvoc a t i on of

the F i f th A m e ndm e nt p r iv ile g e . G u tie rr ezv . H o lde r, 66 2 F . 3d 10 83 , 10 91 (9th C i r. 20 11 ). C ol un gaG u zm an fu rth er co n t en d s th atth e B IA w as b i asedan dv i o l at ed h i s D u e P ro cess r i ght s byr e l y i ng s ol e l yon hi s s i l e nc e . T he r e i s , how e ve r , no i ndi c a t i on i n the re cord thatthe IJor the B IA exhi bi t ed ov ertbi as or abdi ca t ed thei r r ol es as neutra l a d ju d ic a to r s . See R i ve ra v. Mukasey , 5 0 8 F .3 d1 2 7 1 , 1 2 7 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . C ol unga - G uz m a n’ s f

i na l c ont e nt i on i s tha tthe B I A e rr e d i n f i ndi ng tha the la c k e dg o o dm o r a l c h a r a c te rs o le lyo n th e b a s is o f s u c h a n a d v e r s e in f

e r e n c e . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on s, 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2(a) (2)( B ), and thi s det erm i nat i on , m ade und erthe ca t chal l prov i si on of 8 U . S . C . § 1 10 1(f) , w a s p u r e lyd is c r e tio n a ry . L o p ez - Ca s te lla n o s v . G o n z a les , 4 3 7 F .3 d8 4 8 , 8 5 4 ( 9 th C i r. 20 06 ). P e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w D EN I ED i n pa rta nd D I SM I SSED in p a rt.
Brian Jay HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Tracy GREEN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O Ivette MACKROY, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-337

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
----

----

| To:    | United States Securities and Exchange Commission        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                    |   |
| Re:    | Great Panther Silver Limited(the “Company”) |   |
|   | Annual Report on Form 40-F                              |   |
|   | Consent of Expert                                       |   |

| ·   | the use of my name in connection with my involvement in the preparation of the technical report entitled Technical Report on the San Ignacio Project Mineral Resource Guanajuato State, Mexico and dated June 25, 2012 (effective date: March 31, 2012) (the “Technical Report”); |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual Information Form and the MD&A; and |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report and the MD&A. |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated the 7th day of March, 2014 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           633,780
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,722,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                      71,358
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,302,740
<PP&E>                                        68,492,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                25,562,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                45,494,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,654,023
<BONDS>                                       18,815,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       97,450
<COMMON>                                         183,319
<OTHER-SE>                                    24,743,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  45,494,456
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,246,264
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,589,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (196,475)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,108,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (254,897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (254,897)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (254,897)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.039)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.039)



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Landmark Land Company, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Gerald G. Barton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|May 15, 2003 | /s/ GERALD G.
BARTON
Gerald G. Barton
President and Chief Executive Officer
Landmark Land Company, Inc.
|------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leah ROSA v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

NO. 2018-CC-0432

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 19, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Valley High Mining Company (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 15, 2011





/s/ John Thomas HickeyJohn Thomas HickeyChief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) &Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Arthur J. AKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3429

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 914 

Censuring Representative Jamaal Bowman. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2023 

Mrs. MCCLAIN submitted the following resolution 

RESOLUTION 

Censuring Representative Jamaal Bowman. 

Whereas, on September 30, 2023, as the House of Representatives was considering legislation to avoid a lapse of appropriations for Federal agencies and departments which 

would result in a shutdown of those agencies and departments, Jamaal Bowman, the Representative from the 

16th Congressional District of New York, pulled a fire 

alarm; 

Whereas section 22–1319 of the District of Columbia Criminal Code makes knowingly causing a false alarm of fire 

a misdemeanor punishable by fine or imprisonment up to 

six months, or both; 

Whereas section 22–1319 of the District of Columbia Criminal Code states ‘‘It shall be unlawful for any person or 

persons to willfully or knowingly give a false alarm of fire 

within the District of Columbia, and any person or perVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:59 Dec 07, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR914.IH HR914

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 914 IH 

sons violating the provisions of this subsection shall, upon 

conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and be 

punished by a fine not more than the amount set forth 

in section 22–3571.01 [of this Code] or by imprisonment 

for not more than 6 months, or by both such fine and 

imprisonment’’; 

Whereas, on October 26, 2023, Representative Bowman pled 

guilty to violating section 22–1319 of the District of Columbia Criminal Code and was required to pay a $1,000 

fine and write an apology letter to the United States 

Capitol Police and was placed on probation; and 

Whereas the actions of Representative Bowman forced the 

evacuation of the Cannon House Office Building and disrupted the work of the Congress as a vote was underway 

on the floor of the House: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the House of Representatives censures 

3 Jamaal Bowman, Representative from the 16th Con4 gressional District of New York; 

5 (2) Representative Jamaal Bowman will forth6 with present himself in the well of the House of 

7 Representatives for the pronouncement of censure; 

8 and 

9 (3) Representative Jamaal Bowman will be cen10 sured with the public reading of this resolution by 

11 the Speaker. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Khamron ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1897

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### L. David ORMEROD, M.D., Appellant, v. CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Richard L. Wallace, Jack M. Colwill, M.D., and John W. Cowden, M.D., Appellees.

No. 03-3254.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2004.

Decided May 21, 2004.

George Spencer Miller, Law Offices of G. Spencer Miller, Gladstone, MO, James P. Deffet, Larimore & Deffet, Smithville, MO, for Appellant.

Dale C. Doerhoff, Cook & Vetter, Jefferson City, MO, Kelly Klopfenstein Mescher, Columbia, MO, for Appellees.

*72Before RILEY and MELLOY, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSON,1 District Judge.

1

. The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

L. David Ormerod (Dr. Ormerod) appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action. The district court2 found that his claim was barred by the Eleventh Amendment. We affirm.

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. *Treleven v. Univ. of Minn.,*73 F.3d 816, 817 (8th Cir.1996). We will affirm if the record shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the prevailing party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *Id.*(quoting *Maitland v. Univ. of Minn.,*43 F.3d 357, 360 (8th Cir.1994)).

The University of Missouri hired Dr. Ormerod in 1996 as an associate professor of opthalmology. When the university terminated his employment, he brought a section 1983 suit against the university, Richard Wallace, Jack Colwill, and John Cowden. Wallace is the chancellor for the University of Missouri’s Columbia campus, Colwill was the interim dean for the school of medicine, and Cowden chairs the medical school’s department of opthalmology. Dr. Ormerod alleged that his due process rights were violated when the university failed to review his grievances and the university denied him consideration for tenure.

Defendants brought a motion for summary judgment arguing that the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution granted them immunity from this suit seeking monetary damages. The district court noted that previous decisions had established that the University of Missouri-Columbia was entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. The court stated that it was unnecessary to evaluate whether the university was still entitled to immunity because Dr. Ormerod had not shown any change in the university’s circumstances. The court therefore granted the motion for summary judgment as to the university.

The court also granted summary judgment as to the defendants Wallace, Colwill, and Cowden. The parties agreed that these three defendants were acting at all relevant times as agents of the University of Missouri-Columbia. Dr. Ormerod did not clearly specify in his complaint that he was suing them in their individual capacities. Therefore, these defendants were also entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity.

For the reasons given in the district court’s opinion, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.