alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 13 

To prohibit Federal funding of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2023 

Ms. ERNST (for herself, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. CRAPO, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. COTTON, Mr. WICKER, Mr. 

SCOTT of Florida, Mr. RISCH, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. BARRASSO, 

Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. VANCE, Mr. SULLIVAN, 

Mr. THUNE, and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding of Planned Parenthood 

Federation of America. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Funding for 

5 Women’s Health Care Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds as follows: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 13 IS

1 (1) State and county health departments, com2 munity health centers, hospitals, physicians offices, 

3 and other entities currently provide, and will con4 tinue to provide, health services to women. Such 

5 health services include relevant diagnostic laboratory 

6 and radiology services, well-child care, prenatal and 

7 postpartum care, immunization, family planning 

8 services including contraception, sexually trans9 mitted disease testing, cervical and breast cancer 

10 screenings, and referrals. 

11 (2) Many such entities provide services to all 

12 persons, regardless of the person’s ability to pay, 

13 and provide services in medically underserved areas 

14 and to medically underserved populations. 

15 (3) All funds no longer available to Planned 

16 Parenthood Federation of America will continue to 

17 be made available to other eligible entities to provide 

18 women’s health care services. 

19 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION. 

20 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi21 sion of law, no Federal funds may be made available to 

22 Planned Parenthood Federation of America, or to any of 

23 its affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, or clinics. 

24 (b) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

25 shall be construed to— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 13 IS

1 (1) affect any limitation contained in an appro2 priations Act relating to abortion; or 

3 (2) reduce overall Federal funding available in 

4 support of women’s health. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Christopher Clemente, certify that:     1.       I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Comstock Homebuilding Companies, Inc.;     2.       Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4.       The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
Mark A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2043

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Lawrence NIXON

NO. 2017-KO-0966

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.
Alexander R. RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-534

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Nicholas T. DEBELLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2442

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION 

I, M. H. McIlvain, CFO, certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Golden Chief Resources, Inc.; 

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report; 

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report; 

4.     I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

            a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the Corporation,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

            b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

            c)       disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I havedisclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

            a)       all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

            b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 28, 2004 

By:/s/ M. H. McIlvain
ANDREW CHIEN AGENT


 


----EDGAR FILING SERVICE





 


 





	
        Address: 665 Ellsworth Avenue

        New Haven, CT 06511, USA

        Email:uschien@uschinachannel.net

        Tel: (001) 203-844-0809; (001) 203-562-8899






 


 EDGAR FILING AGENCY
AGREEMENT




This Edgar Filing Agency Agreement is made and entered into as
August 14, 2011 between Andrew Chien (“Agent”) and China Northern Medical Device, Inc.(“China Northern”
or “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, Agent is an Edgar Filer in the business to do Edgar filing
for companies who is a SEC reporting company.


 


WHEREAS, CHINA NORTHERN is a SEC reporting company.


 


WHEREAS, CHINA NORTHERN wishes to utilize the services of Agent
to do Edgar filing under the term of this Agreement and Agent wishes to become the company’s file agency.


 


Now, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein
contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1. Appointment of Agent. Upon the execution of this agreement
by both parties, CHINA NORTHERN hereby appoints Agent as Edgar Filing Agency.


 


2. Fees. Total filing service fee for one year’s 10-K and
10-Qs filing is $4,000. The first down payment is $2,000 and six month later CHINA NORTHERN pay additional $2,000.


 


3. CHINA NORTHERN responsibilities:(a).Any filing document must
deliver to Agent, one week ahead of filing;(b).The document should be in Word format, all financial statement must be in Excel
format


 


4. Modification: No change, modification, addition, or amendment
to this Agreement will be valid unless in writing and signed by all parties hereto.


 


5. No Interpretation against drafter: This Agreement has been
negotiated between persons sophisticated and knowledgeable in these types of matters. Accordingly, any normal rule of construction
or legal decision that would require a court to resolve any ambiguities against the drafting party is hereby waived and shall not
apply in interpreting this Agreement.


 


6. Venue/Governing Law: Venues for all proceedings in connection
with this Agreement shall be New Haven County, Connecticut, and all aspect of this Agreement should be governed by laws of State
of Connecticut.


 


7. Termination: Any termination should issue two weeks ahead by
writing notice to another party.


Agent 
 Company


Andrew Chien 
CHINA NORTHERN MEDICAL DEVICE,
INC.



/s/Andrew Chien             
                                                     
/s/Wujin Zhao
      Andrew Chien;


 Wujin Zhao; President


   Date: August 14, 2011
    Date: August 14, 2011
## 1997 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

10-24-1997 

# B a r r y v . B e r ge n C t y P r ob a t ion

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 96-5577



## F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1997 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" B a r r y v . Be r g e n C t y P r o b a t ion " (1997). 1997 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 251. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1997/251

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 96

- 5577 Barry vs. Bergen Cty Probation

The following modifications have been made to the Court' s Opinion issued on October 22, 1997 in the above

- entitled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion:
In the above referenced slip opinion, on page 4, line 20, the sentence beginning with the words "All right." should be in dented to indicate a new paragraph.

On page 25, line 19, delete the quotation marks after the word "significant" and before the word "the".

Very truly yours,

/s/ P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk Dated: November 4, 1997
Jordy FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3352

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


 


I, Shlomo Palas, certify that:


 


1. I have reviewed this Current Report, Form 8-K, of Blue Sphere Corp.; and,


 


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


 


Date: 4 October 2011


 



	
/s/ Shlomo Palas


	
Chief Executive Officer
STATE EX REL. Stephen K. LANPHIER v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0180

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Jannett PUSEY, Appellant, v. Kristy GARCIA, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1060

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 24, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
C.S., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. C.C. and J.C., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1548

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Pamela FRENCH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE OF FLORIDA, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1054

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Order entered November 30 , 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00713

- CR

BRIAN EVAN WALKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 066232



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 23, 2016 unopposed second motion to extend

time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED . Appellant’s brief shall be filed

by December 16, 2016

.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
J.L.C., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joseph SEEBER, Superintendent, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 10, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert A. Archer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Great Panther Silver
      Limited for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Great Panther Silver Limited.                                                              

Dated: March 19, 2010

| | /s/
      Robert A. Archer           
| | -------------------------------------
| | Robert A. Archer                     
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        
| | Great Panther Silver Limited         



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Panther
Silver Limited and will be retained by Great Panther Silver Limited and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. VIC TOR GAR C IA-GAR C IA, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-50062

D.C . No. 3:10-c r-01798-JLS M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Ja nis L. Sa m m artino, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Vic tor Ga rc ia -Garc ia

a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 72-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for be ing a de porte d a lie n found in the Unite d State s, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED MAY27 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Garc ia -Ga rc ia c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt e rre d

in a pply ing a 16-le ve l e nha nc e m e nt unde r U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) be c a u se the doc um e nts use d to prove that he suffe re d a

1998 c onvic tion for posse ssion or purc ha s e of a c ontrolle d substa nc e for sa l e , in viola

tion of se c tion 11351 of the C a l ifornia He a lth a

nd Sa fe ty C ode , we re not suffic ie ntly re lia ble to e sta

blish tha t he wa s the pe rson who suffe re d tha

t c onvic tion. Notwithsta

nding them inor inc o nsiste nc y be twe e n the c ha rging doc um e nt for Ga

rc ia -Garc i a ’ s prior offe nse and his ra p she e t , the distric t c ourt did not a

buse its disc re t ion by

c onc luding tha

t the finge rprint-ve rifie d ra p she e t wa s suffic i e ntly

re lia ble to show tha

t Ga rc ia -Garc ia wa s c onvic te d of the 1998 offe nse . Se e Unite d State s v . Alv arado-Martine

z , 556 F.3d 732, 735 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). Garc ia -Ga

rc ia a lso c onte nds tha

t his se nte n c e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble be c a use it is gre ate r tha

n ne c e ssa ry in light of his pe

rsona l c ha

ra c te ristic s a

nd the m itiga ting a rgum e nts he ra ise d at the se nte nc ing he aring. The distric t c o urt did not a buse i ts disc re tion in im

posing Ga

rc i a -Garc ia ’ s se nte nc e . Se e Gall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the 1 8 U.S.C . § 3553(a ) se nte nc ing fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of the c irc um sta

n c e s. Se e id . AFFIRM E D.
1 3 - 5 0 0 6 2 2
p. 1 of 1

From: Bruntz, Samuel H. [ mailto:Samuel.Bruntz@alcoa.com ]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 3:40 PM
To: Putney, David
Cc: Palazzolo, Michael A. Subject: TF data from primary aluminum facilities

David,

You will find attached an excel spreadsheet that su mmarizes TF emissions for each potline at Alcoa Inc . – Warrick Operations for the time period March 1 – Au gust 31, 2013.

You will note that the primary control device emiss ions for potlines 3 and 4 are higher than for the o ther 3 potlines. Potlines 3 and 4 exhaust to a common alu mina injection gas treatment center (GTC). The GTC differs from the A-398 fluidized bed technology utililzed f or the other 3 potlines. Each of the other 3 potlin es exhaust through individual A-398 systems.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Sam Bruntz Sr. Staff Environmental Engineer Alcoa Inc. – Warrick Operations (812) 853-1519
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to  the Annual Report of Panoshan
Marketing Corp., (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending June
30, 2008, and as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berardo, Director, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      January 28, 2009
                By:
                /s/ David
      J. BerardoName:
      David J. BerardoTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 73/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 73 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 642 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 73

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 642 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 73/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9981 — Bain Capital/Ahlstrom-Munksjö) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 73/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9776 — Worldline/Ingenico) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 73/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9981 — Bain Capital/Ahlstrom-Munksjö) (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 73/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9776 — Worldline/Ingenico) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 73/03 | Euro exchange rates — 1 March 2021 | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 73/03

Euro exchange rates — 1 March 2021

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 73/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10121 — Platinum Equity Group/Ingram Micro Inc.) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 73/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10121 — Platinum Equity Group/Ingram Micro Inc.) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
Adrian PREISS and Red Lion, LLC, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4796

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
The model code and executables, as well as the AERSCREEN User’s Guide and test cases, for the latest 

version of AERSCREEN and MAKEMET (both version 15181) are available at the following URL:

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/11thmodconf.htm#aerscreen