alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ18-9-000]


Buckeye Power, Inc.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 29, 2017, Buckeye Power, Inc. 
submitted its tariff filing: Buckeye Revised Rate Schedule Filing to be 
effective 12/29/2017.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#094f4c5b4a46676560676c5a7c7979667b7d496f6c7b6a276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a1c1f081915343633343f092f2a2a35282e1a3c3f2839743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 19, 2018.

    Dated: January 12, 2018..
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-01017 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC., a foreign profit corporation, Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, and Chipotle Services, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, Petitioners, v. Yuvitkza QUINONES, Respondent.

No. 4D17-2764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2018]

Christopher S. Stratton and Lee A. Kantor of Hightower Stratton Novigrod Kantor, West Palm Beach, for petitioner Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC.

Lara S. Shiner of Shiner Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC ("Chipotle"), petitions this court for certiorari review of the trial court's order overruling its objections to discovery requests made by the plaintiff, Yuvitkza Quinones ("Quinones"), in the underlying premises liability action. We grant the petition and quash the trial court's order because the trial court's ruling was entered by default, and the trial court failed to conduct an *in camera* inspection of documents, *6which Chipotle claimed to be privileged.

Due to a calendaring error, Chipotle's counsel appeared approximately fifteen minutes late for a special set one-hour hearing, which was set to address a variety of matters including Chipotle's objections to Quinones's first request for production and first set of interrogatories. The record reflects that the trial court entered a default ruling in favor of Quinones due to counsel's failure to timely appear.1

In overruling Chipotle's objections, the trial court also failed to conduct an *in camera* inspection of various documents that Chipotle claimed to be privileged. These documents were specifically identified in a privilege log filed by Chipotle. Quinones argues that Chipotle waived its claims of privilege by failing to timely object. However, failure to timely raise objections based on privilege does not automatically result in waiver. *Palm Beach Primary Care Assocs., Inc. v. Mufti* , 935 So.2d 122, 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ; *Austin v. Barnett Bank of S. Fla., N.A.* , 472 So.2d 830, 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Even if a claim of privilege is untimely raised, the trial court is required to conduct an *in camera* inspection of the documents claimed to be privileged. *Mufti* , 935 So.2d at 123. Failure to conduct the requisite *in camera* inspection is a departure from the essential requirements of the law. *Id.*

Quinones also argues that Chipotle failed to timely file its privilege log. However, the obligation to file a privilege log does not arise until after a party's written objections have been ruled upon. *Gosman v. Luzinski* , 937 So.2d 293, 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Accordingly, we grant the petition and quash the trial court's order to the extent that it overruled Chipotle's objections to Quinones's first request for production and first set of interrogatories.

Warner, Taylor and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

1

Quinones asserts that the trial court afforded Chipotle's counsel an opportunity to argue the objections after counsel appeared. This assertion is refuted by the trial court's order, which states that Chipotle's counsel failed to appear.
BLOCK CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION FOR the PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

NO. 2018-C-0301

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
Billy SWIFT, et al. v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-0104

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.
Joseph SANCHEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3417

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. David ALBRECHT, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1088

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1259 

To prohibit the provision of Federal assistance to transit and rail projects 

with significant cost overruns and that are projected to lose money, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2023 

Ms. ERNST introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit the provision of Federal assistance to transit 

and rail projects with significant cost overruns and that 

are projected to lose money, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Put the Brakes on 

5 Boondoggles Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1259 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR 

2 CERTAIN TRANSIT AND RAIL PROJECTS. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec4 retary of Transportation shall not provide any new assist5 ance for a transit or rail project if— 

6 (1) the overall cost projection to complete the 

7 project exceeds the original cost projection by at 

8 least $1,000,000,000; and 

9 (2) the operational and administrative costs of 

10 the service provided by the project are projected to 

11 exceed the revenues generated from ridership annu12 ally over the next decade. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1390 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1390

 To repeal the sunset provision of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2023

Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Hagerty, and 
  Ms. Rosen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the sunset provision of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Solidify Iran Sanctions Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-172; 50 
        U.S.C. 1701 note) requires the imposition of sanctions with 
        respect to Iran's illicit weapons programs, conventional 
        weapons and ballistic missile development, and support for 
        terrorism, including Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps.
            (2) The Government of Iran has acquired destabilizing 
        conventional weapons systems from the Russian Federation and 
        other malign actors, and is funneling weapons and financial 
        support to its terrorist proxies throughout the Middle East, 
        threatening allies and partners of the United States, such as 
        Israel.

SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

    It is the policy of the United States to fully implement and 
enforce the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-172; 50 U.S.C. 
1701 note).

SEC. 4. REPEAL OF SUNSET.

    Section 13 of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-172; 
50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``; sunset'';
            (2) by striking ``(a) Effective Date.--''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
Alejandro FERRER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-3711

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9

GMAC MORTGAGE

    March 10, 2005

    REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
    KERRY A. LAYDEN
    ONE BELVEDERE PLACE
    SUITE 300
    MILL VALLEY, CA 94941

    RE: ANNUAL OFFICERS STATEMENT
        OF COMPLIANCE YEAR ENDING 2004
        GMACM INVESTOR AGREEMENT # 41040

    We hereby certify to the best of our knowledge and belief, that for the
    calendar year 2004:

    1.    A review of the activities of the Seller / Servicer and of
          performance according to the Seller / Servicer contract has been
          made with the undersigned Officer's knowledge.

    2.    To the best of the undersigned Officer's knowledge, and based on
          such review, the Seller / Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
          under the Guides for such year.

    3.    If applicable, GMACM has filed the information returns with respect
          to the receipt of mortgage interest pursuant to Sections 6050H,
          6050J and 6050P of the Code, received in a trade or business,
          reports of foreclosures and abandonment's of any Mortgaged Property
          and the information returns relating to cancellation of indebtedness
          income with respect to any Mortgaged Property.

    4.    All hazard, flood, FHA mortgage insurance and primary mortgage
          insurance premiums, taxes, ground rents, assessments and other
          lienable items have been paid in connection with the mortgaged
          properties.

    5.    All property inspections have been completed as required.

    6.    Compliance relative to Adjustable Rate Mortgages has been met.

    7.    Fidelity Bond and Errors and Omissions Insurance coverage is
          current, in full force and effect.

    Servicer: GMAC Mortgage Corporation

    By: /s/ Michael Kacergis
        -----------------------

    Name: Michael Kacergis

    Title: Manager, Contract Administration
           National Loan Administration Risk and Compliance

500 Enterprise Road
Suite 150
Horsham, PA 19044
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the Corporation)
      for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas J. Bisko, President and CEO, of
      the
      Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this periodic report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.







Date: November
      8, 2006


By: /s/
      Thomas J. Bisko


Thomas
      J.
      Bisko


President
      and CEO





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to QNB Corp. and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in the Form 10-Q of American Safety Razor Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000750339
<NAME> AMERICAN SAFETY RAZOR COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            1452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    42640
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      55736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                107525
<PP&E>                                          119117
<DEPRECIATION>                                   45341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  258051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            40450
<BONDS>                                         123481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                       62254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    258051
<SALES>                                         140262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                140262
<CGS>                                            96954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    96954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4781
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
Unassociated Document


    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

    


    
      

    

     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

     

    
      Executed
        as of the date set forth above.


      
        	 	 	 	SELLER: 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:
                /s/ James R. Latimer, III
	
              	 	 	
                

                James R. Latimer, III, 
Chief Restructuring Officer 
	 	 	 	 


      

       

    

    

      	 	 	 	BUYER:
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	TANDEM
              ENERGY CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:
              /s/ Tim G. Culp
	
            	 	 	
              

              Name: Tim G. Culp
Title: President
	 	 	 	 


    

    
 

     

         Signature
      Page Purchase and Sale
      Agreement
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,181]


Stanley Access Technologies, a Subsidiary of Stanley Works, 
Farmington, CT; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 9, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of 
Stanley Access Technologies, a subsidiary of Stanley Works, Farmington, 
Connecticut.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7749 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1237 

To restore the exemption of family farms and small businesses from the 

definition of assets under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2023 

Ms. ERNST (for herself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. 

RICKETTS, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To restore the exemption of family farms and small businesses from the definition of assets under title IV of 

the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Farm and 

5 Small Business Exemption Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1237 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FAMILY FARMS AND SMALL BUSI2 NESSES FROM ASSETS UNDER THE HIGHER 

3 EDUCATION ACT OF 1965. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 480(f)(2) of the Higher 

5 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087vv), as amended 

6 by section 702(l)(2) of the FAFSA Simplification Act 

7 (title VII of division FF of Public Law 116–260; 134 Stat. 

8 3163), is further amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘net value of the’’ and inserting 

10 the following: ‘‘net value of— 

11 ‘‘(A) the’’; 

12 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert13 ing a semicolon; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(B) a family farm on which the family re16 sides; or 

17 ‘‘(C) a small business with not more than 

18 100 full-time or full-time equivalent employees 

19 (or any part of such a small business) that is 

20 owned and controlled by the family.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the 

23 FAFSA Simplification Act (title VII of division FF of 

24 Public Law 116–260) and subject to the effective date of 

25 section 701(b) of such Act, as amended by section 102(a) 

26 of the FAFSA Simplification Act Technical Corrections 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1237 IS

1 Act (division R of Public Law 117–103) (including the 

2 authorization provided under section 102(c)(1)(A) of such 

3 Act). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
March, 22, 2011

Mr. Mike Haley

Sheriff Washoe County Sheriff’s Office

911 Parr Boulevard Reno, NV 89512

Dear Mr. Haley:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 61.118 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and tells you what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your January 5, 2011, exemption request for Washoe County Sheriff’s Office into the public docket (No. FAA-2000-8182), but we are unable to process your request any

further.

You have requested an extension and amendment to Exemption No. 6836. However, that exemption expired on October 27, 2000. The last exemption you held for the same request was Exemption No. 7473A, and it expired on March 31, 2005. Therefore, you will need to submit a new exemption request. The information you send should comply with the requirements of 14 CFR § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

Since your last request, § 61.118 has been re-designated as § 61.113. When drafting your new request, you should review § 61.113(e) to the extent necessary.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without further notice. If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Louise FINNO, Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. as Successor by Merger, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1625

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.