Name:

Title:

Company:

Sign Date:

Name: Ned Shappley

Title: QAM

Company: METCO Environmental

Sign Date:

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Page 1 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Facility Information:

Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc.

4200 Bells Lane

Louisville KY 40211- 

Contact: Susan Clark

Phone: (502) 772-5705

Fax:

Email: susan.clark@lubrizol.com

Testing Company:

METCO Environmental

3226 Commander Dr

Carrollton TX 75006- 

Contact:Ned Shappley

Phone: (972) 931-7127

Fax:

Email: nshappley@metcoenv.com

Air Permit Number:

129-97-TV KY S-LTX-TK-SCR-1

Permitted Maximum Process Rate: Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: Target Process Test Rat

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: FRS #: 110000741500

SCC / Description 64631010 MACT Source Categories - Vinyl-based Resins - Polyvinyl Chloride and 

Copolymers Production - Dispersion Process - Process Vents: Dispersion Process

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Permitted Source ID/Name:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

FTO Exhaust 

Stack - Level 1

11.25 24 48 2 24

FTO Exhaust 

Stack - Level 4

11.25 147 66 2 12

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Location Duration Comments

Total organic compounds 

(TOC) as Propane

FTO Exhaust Method 25A 3 240

Stack - Level 1

FTO Exhaust Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 192

Stack - Level 1

Page 2 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

FTO Exhaust Chlorine Method 26A 3 192

Stack - Level 1

FTO Exhaust 2,3,7,8-TCDD Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust OCDD Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 2,3,7,8-TCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust OCDF Method 23 3 360

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust Carbon Dioxide Method 3A CO2 6 180

Stack - Level 4

FTO Exhaust Oxygen Method 3A O2 6 180

Stack - Level 4

Page 3 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 25A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM

Run Finish Time 4:10:00 PM 4:25:00 PM 3:00:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567

Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1166.5 1171.2 1145 1,160.900

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 38.05 38.58 40.77 39.133

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM

Run Finish Time 3:42:00 PM 3:57:00 PM 2:32:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 112.17 113.42 110.13 111.907

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 38.72 39.38 38.02 38.707

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 39.15 38.74 38.36 38.750

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567

Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 167.77 167.00 167.00 167.257

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,156.4 1,159.3 1,127.6 1,147.767

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,273.3 2,293.1 2,183.0 2,249.800

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.8 97.6 97.4 97.267

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Page 4 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 23

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM

Run Finish Time 5:10:00 PM 5:25:00 PM 4:00:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 360 360 360

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 220.95 229.43 226.47 225.617

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 38.05 38.58 40.77 39.133

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 39.33 37.40 39.28 38.670

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567

Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 167.92 165.49 168.00 167.137

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,166.5 1,171.2 1,145.0 1,160.900

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,271.2 2,261.7 2,267.9 2,266.933

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 104.2 105.2 103.400

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/4/2014 11/6/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 10:45:00 AM

Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 5:10:00 PM 1:45:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.5171 2.0374 4.6305 2.728

Oxygen, % 0 0 0 0.000

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1166.5 1166.5 1171.2 1,168.067

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 38.05 38.05 38.58 38.227

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Page 5 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 3

Average

Run Number 4 5 6

Test Date 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 2:25:00 PM 9:30:00 AM 1:00:00 PM

Run Finish Time 5:25:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 4:00:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 4.4967 4.401 4.2366 4.378

Oxygen, % 0 0 0 0.000

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1171.2 1145 1145 1,153.733

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 38.58 40.77 40.77 40.040

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/4/2014 11/6/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 10:45:00 AM

Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 5:10:00 PM 1:45:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 0 0 0 0.000

Oxygen, % 18.4357 17.7245 13.3836 16.515

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0 0 0 0.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 0 0 0 0.000

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Page 6 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 3

Average

Run Number 4 5 6

Test Date 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 2:25:00 PM 9:30:00 AM 1:00:00 PM

Run Finish Time 5:25:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 4:00:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 0 0 0 0.000

Oxygen, % 13.1724 23.4306 23.0122 19.872

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0 0 0 0.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 0 0 0 0.000

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Page 7 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Emissions Summary

Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 25A

Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) as 

Average Reg Limit

Run 1 2 3

ppm 8.07E-02 4.88E-02 0.00E+00 4.32E-02

ppm@3%O2 5.16E-01 1.15E-01 0.00E+00 2.10E-01

Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 26A

Compound: Chlorine

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 15.739 0.965 55.525 2.41E+01

ppm 1.68E+00 1.02E-01 6.04E+00 2.61E+00

ppm@3%O2 1.07E+01 2.40E-01 1.37E+01 8.21E+00

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 4.775 1.169 8.928 4.96E+00

ppm 9.92E-01 2.40E-01 1.89E+00 1.04E+00

ppm@3%O2 6.34E+00 5.65E-01 4.28E+00 3.73E+00

Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 23

Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000734 0.00000000777 0.00000000768 7.60E-09

ng/dscm 1.17E-03 1.20E-03 1.20E-03 1.19E-03

ng/dscm@3%O2 7.48E-03 2.83E-03 2.72E-03 4.34E-03

Compound: 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0000000109 0.00000000931 0.0000000167 1.23E-08

ng/dscm 1.74E-03 1.43E-03 2.60E-03 1.92E-03

ng/dscm@3%O2 1.11E-02 3.37E-03 5.89E-03 6.79E-03

Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000222 0.00000000265 0.00000000196 2.28E-09

ng/dscm 3.55E-04 4.08E-04 3.06E-04 3.56E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 2.27E-03 9.61E-04 6.93E-04 1.31E-03

Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000183 0.0000000016 0.00000000188 1.77E-09

ng/dscm 2.93E-04 2.46E-04 2.93E-04 2.77E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 1.87E-03 5.79E-04 6.64E-04 1.04E-03

Page 8 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Compound: 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000819 0.00000000732 0.00000000982 8.44E-09

ng/dscm 1.31E-03 1.13E-03 1.53E-03 1.32E-03

ng/dscm@3%O2 8.37E-03 2.66E-03 3.47E-03 4.83E-03

Compound: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000198 0.00000000178 0.00000000206 1.94E-09

ng/dscm 3.17E-04 2.74E-04 3.21E-04 3.04E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 2.03E-03 6.45E-04 7.27E-04 1.13E-03

Compound: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000465 0.00000000467 0.00000000845 5.92E-09

ng/dscm 7.43E-04 7.19E-04 1.32E-03 9.27E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 4.75E-03 1.69E-03 2.99E-03 3.14E-03

Compound: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000225 0.00000000263 0.00000000216 2.35E-09

ng/dscm 3.60E-04 4.05E-04 3.37E-04 3.67E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 2.30E-03 9.54E-04 7.64E-04 1.34E-03

Compound: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000136 0.00000000178 0.00000000191 1.68E-09

ng/dscm 2.17E-04 2.74E-04 2.98E-04 2.63E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 1.39E-03 6.45E-04 6.75E-04 9.03E-04

Compound: 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000192 0.00000000236 0.00000000234 2.21E-09

ng/dscm 3.07E-04 3.63E-04 3.65E-04 3.45E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 1.96E-03 8.55E-04 8.27E-04 1.21E-03

Compound: 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000918 0.0000000106 0.0000000129 1.09E-08

ng/dscm 1.47E-03 1.63E-03 2.01E-03 1.70E-03

ng/dscm@3%O2 9.40E-03 3.84E-03 4.55E-03 5.93E-03

Compound: 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000475 0.00000000565 0.00000000793 6.11E-09

Page 9 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

ng/dscm 7.59E-04 8.70E-04 1.24E-03 9.56E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 4.85E-03 2.05E-03 2.81E-03 3.24E-03

Compound: 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.000000013 0.0000000139 0.0000000137 1.35E-08

ng/dscm 2.08E-03 2.14E-03 2.14E-03 2.12E-03

ng/dscm@3%O2 1.33E-02 5.04E-03 4.85E-03 7.73E-03

Compound: 2,3,7,8-TCDD

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00000000161 0.00000000159 0.00000000187 1.69E-09

ng/dscm 2.57E-04 2.45E-04 2.92E-04 2.65E-04

ng/dscm@3%O2 1.64E-03 5.77E-04 6.62E-04 9.60E-04

Compound: 2,3,7,8-TCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0000000177 0.0000000183 0.0000000193 1.84E-08

ng/dscm 2.83E-03 2.82E-03 3.01E-03 2.89E-03

ng/dscm@3%O2 1.81E-02 6.64E-03 6.82E-03 1.05E-02

Compound: OCDD

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0000000305 0.0000000301 0.0000000318 3.08E-08

ng/dscm 4.88E-03 4.63E-03 4.96E-03 4.82E-03

ng/dscm@3%O2 3.12E-02 1.09E-02 1.12E-02 1.78E-02

Compound: OCDF

Average Reg Limit

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0000000101 0.00000000887 0.0000000136 1.09E-08

ng/dscm 1.61E-03 1.37E-03 2.12E-03 1.70E-03

ng/dscm@3%O2 1.03E-02 3.23E-03 4.80E-03 6.11E-03

Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2

Compound: Carbon Dioxide

Average Reg Limit

Run 1 2 3

Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 3

Compound: Carbon Dioxide

Average Reg Limit

Run 4 5 6

Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2

Compound: Oxygen

Average Reg Limit

Run 1 2 3

Location: FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 3

Page 10 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Compound: Oxygen

Average Reg Limit

Run 4 5 6

Page 11 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

Process: Work Produced

Comment:

SCC: 64631010

Run Value Unit of Measure Target Low Target High Comment

1 1 Tons/hr 0 0 Default

APCD: WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY

Comment:

Run Value Unit of Measure Target Value Comment

1 1 0 Default

Page 12 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 25A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM

Run Finish Time 4:10:00 PM 4:25:00 PM 3:00:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567

Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800

Fuel Factor 0 0 0

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1166.5 1171.2 1145 1,160.900

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 38.05 38.58 40.77 39.133

Analyzer Make Thermo 

Environmental

Thermo 

Environment

al

Thermo 

Environmenta

l

Analyzer Model 55I 55I 55I

Analyzer Serial Number 20171660 20171660 20171660 20,171,660.

000

Operating Range 100 100 100 100.000

Operating Units ppm ppm ppm

No. Readings/Avg. 240 240 240 240.000

Calibration Set 7 7 7 7.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.02 0.1 0 0.027

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift -0.17 -0.05 -0.15 -0.123

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID prop 

ALM067192

prop 

ALM067192

prop 

ALM067192

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 45.6 46.82 46.8 46.407

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias 1.9 3.12 3.1 2.707

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.1 0 0 0.033

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.05 -0.15 -0.15 -0.117

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.12 0.1 0 0.073

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID prop 

ALM067192

prop 

ALM067192

prop 

ALM067192

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 46.82 46.8 0 31.207

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 3.12 3.1 -43.7 -12.493

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 1.22 0.02 46.8 16.013

Cavg 0.05 0.03 0 0.027

Cavg Units ppmvw ppmvw ppmvw

Cgas 0.0807 0.0488 0 0.043

Cgas Units ppmvd ppmvd ppmvd

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw 0.05 0.03 0 0.027

Page 13 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Cgasw Units ppmvw ppmvw ppmvw

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 1 - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM

Run Finish Time 3:42:00 PM 3:57:00 PM 2:32:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 48 48 48

Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.257 0.257 0.257 0.257

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.990

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.984 0.984 0.984 0.984

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.57 29.36 29.63 29.520

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.16 1.19 1.09 1.147

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 114.042 115.373 111.884 113.766

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 63.56 60.16 64.11 62.610

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 112.17 113.42 110.13 111.907

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 1506.3 1565.8 1435.6 1,502.567

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 70.88 73.68 67.55 70.703

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 38.72 39.38 38.02 38.707

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 39.15 38.74 38.36 38.750

Dry Mole Fraction 0.6128 0.6126 0.6198 0.615

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567

Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.1 82.1 82.7 81.633

Fuel Factor 1.56 1.65 1.84

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.01 29.27 29.21 29.163

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 24.75 25.02 24.95 24.907

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.5 -0.5 -0.3 -0.433

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.53 29.32 29.61 29.487

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 167.77 167.00 167.00 167.257

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.4900073727

7766

0.501206986

782949

0.4572928661

27374

0.483

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 54.91 55.39 52.73 54.343

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 0.690 0.690 0.690 0.690

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,156.4 1,159.3 1,127.6 1,147.767

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,273.3 2,293.1 2,183.0 2,249.800

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 96.8 97.6 97.4 97.267

Percent Excess Air, % 594.1 158.8 147.2 300.033

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 11.25 11.25 11.25

Rectangular Duct Width, inches

Rectangular Duct Length, inches

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Page 14 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 23

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/6/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 9:30:00 AM

Run Finish Time 5:10:00 PM 5:25:00 PM 4:00:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 72 72 72

Net Run Time, minutes 360 360 360

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.257 0.257 0.257 0.257

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.990

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.009 1.009 1.009 1.009

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.54 29.36 29.63 29.510

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.30 1.35 1.33 1.327

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 221.982 226.812 223.340 224.045

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 70.15 58.57 62.02 63.580

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 220.95 229.43 226.47 225.617

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 2884.4 3062.4 3312.5 3,086.433

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 135.73 144.11 155.87 145.237

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 38.05 38.58 40.77 39.133

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 39.33 37.40 39.28 38.670

Dry Mole Fraction 0.6195 0.626 0.6072 0.618

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.8 4.6 4.3 3.567

Oxygen, % 18.1 13.3 13 14.800

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.1 82.1 82.7 81.633

Fuel Factor 1.56 1.65 1.84

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.01 29.27 29.21 29.163

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 24.82 25.27 25.07 25.053

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.500

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.50 29.32 29.59 29.470

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 167.92 165.49 168.00 167.137

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.4900073727

7766

0.493551960

768793

0.4947774203

06099

0.493

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 54.86 54.63 54.78 54.757

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 0.690 0.690 0.690 0.690

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,166.5 1,171.2 1,145.0 1,160.900

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,271.2 2,261.7 2,267.9 2,266.933

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 104.2 105.2 103.400

Percent Excess Air, % 594.1 158.8 147.2 300.033

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 11.25 11.25 11.25

Rectangular Duct Width, inches

Rectangular Duct Length, inches

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Page 15 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/4/2014 11/6/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 10:45:00 AM

Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 5:10:00 PM 1:45:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.5171 2.0374 4.6305 2.728

Oxygen, % 0 0 0 0.000

Fuel Factor 0 0 0

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1166.5 1166.5 1171.2 1,168.067

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 38.05 38.05 38.58 38.227

Analyzer Make Horiba Horiba Horiba

Analyzer Model VA-3000 VA-3000 VA-3000

Analyzer Serial Number YGN781BP YGN781BP YGN781BP

Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000

Operating Units % % %

No. Readings/Avg. 720 720 720 720.000

Calibration Set 4 4 5 4.333

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.01 0.09 0.05 0.050

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0.3 0.7 0.35 0.450

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CO2 ALM 

065652

CO2 ALM 

065652

CO2 ALM 

065652

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 10.99 11.06 11.02 11.023

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.8 -0.45 -0.35 -0.533

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.09 -0.01 0.09 0.057

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 0.7 0.2 0.55 0.483

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.367

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CO2 ALM 

065652

CO2 ALM 

065652

CO2 ALM 

065652

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.06 11.03 11.03 11.040

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias -0.45 -0.6 -0.3 -0.450

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.35 0.15 0.05 0.183

Cavg 1.55 2.06 4.64 2.750

Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd

Cgas 1.5171 2.0374 4.6305 2.728

Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw Units

Page 16 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A CO2 3

Average

Run Number 4 5 6

Test Date 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 2:25:00 PM 9:30:00 AM 1:00:00 PM

Run Finish Time 5:25:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 4:00:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 4.4967 4.401 4.2366 4.378

Oxygen, % 0 0 0 0.000

Fuel Factor 0 0 0

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1171.2 1145 1145 1,153.733

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 38.58 40.77 40.77 40.040

Analyzer Make Horiba Horiba Horiba

Analyzer Model VA-3000 VA-3000 VA-3000

Analyzer Serial Number YGN781BP YGN781BP YGN781BP

Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000

Operating Units % % %

No. Readings/Avg. 720 720 720 720.000

Calibration Set 5 6 6 5.667

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.09 -0.08 -0.07 -0.020

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0.55 -0.25 -0.2 0.033

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID CO2 ALM 

065652

CO2 ALM 

065652

CO2 ALM 

065652

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.03 11.05 11.02 11.033

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.3 0.65 0.5 0.283

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.03 -0.07 -0.09 -0.063

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.05 -0.2 -0.3 -0.183

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.6 0.05 0.1 0.250

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID CO2 ALM 

065652

CO2 ALM 

065652

CO2 ALM 

065652

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 10.95 11.02 11.09 11.020

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias -0.7 0.5 0.85 0.217

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.4 0.15 0.35 0.300

Cavg 4.47 4.33 4.17 4.323

Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd

Cgas 4.4967 4.401 4.2366 4.378

Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw Units

Page 17 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 11/4/2014 11/4/2014 11/6/2014

Run Start Time 10:52:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 10:45:00 AM

Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 5:10:00 PM 1:45:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 0 0 0 0.000

Oxygen, % 18.4357 17.7245 13.3836 16.515

Fuel Factor 0 0 0

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0 0 0 0.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 0 0 0 0.000

Analyzer Make Horiba Horiba Horiba

Analyzer Model VA-3000 VA-3000 VA-3000

Analyzer Serial Number YGN781B YGN781B YGN781B

Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000

Operating Units % % %

No. Readings/Avg. 720 720 720 720.000

Calibration Set 1 1 2 1.333

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.09 0.19 0.23 0.170

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 0.6 1.11 0.95 0.887

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID O2 ALM 

065652

O2 ALM 

065652

O2 ALM 

065652

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.04 11.12 11.05 11.070

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.3 0.1 -0.25 -0.150

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.19 0.1 0.27 0.187

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias 1.11 0.65 1.16 0.973

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 0.51 0.46 0.21 0.393

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID O2 ALM 

065652

O2 ALM 

065652

O2 ALM 

065652

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.12 11.07 11.08 11.090

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.1 -0.15 -0.1 -0.050

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.267

Cavg 18.31 17.63 13.29 16.410

Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd

Cgas 18.4357 17.7245 13.3836 16.515

Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw Units

Page 18 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Location FTO Exhaust Stack - Level 4 - Method 3A O2 3

Average

Run Number 4 5 6

Test Date 11/6/2014 11/7/2014 11/7/2014

Run Start Time 2:25:00 PM 9:30:00 AM 1:00:00 PM

Run Finish Time 5:25:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 4:00:00 PM

Carbon Dioxide, % 0 0 0 0.000

Oxygen, % 13.1724 23.4306 23.0122 19.872

Fuel Factor 0 0 0

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 0 0 0 0.000

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 0 0 0 0.000

Moisture, % 0 0 0 0.000

Analyzer Make Horiba Horiba Horiba

Analyzer Model VA-3000 VA-3000 VA-3000

Analyzer Serial Number YGN781B YGN781B YGN781B

Operating Range 25 25 25 25.000

Operating Units % % %

No. Readings/Avg. 720 720 720 720.000

Calibration Set 2 3 3 2.667

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response 0.27 0.2 0.19 0.220

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift 1.16 1.06 1.01 1.077

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID O2 ALM 

065652

O2 ALM 

017907

O2 ALM 

017907

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.08 10.96 11.13 11.057

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias -0.1 -44.67 -43.82 -29.530

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift 0 0 0 0.000

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID N2 alm 12668 N2 alm 

12668

N2 alm 12668

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response -0.01 0.19 0.06 0.080

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias -0.25 1.01 0.35 0.370

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift 1.41 0.05 0.66 0.707

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID O2 ALM 

065652

O2 ALM 

017907

O2 ALM 

017907

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response 11.14 11.13 11.18 11.150

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias 0.2 -43.82 -43.57 -29.063

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift 0.3 0.850000000

000001

0.25 0.467

Cavg 13.16 12.97 12.88 13.003

Cavg Units %vd %vd %vd

Cgas 13.1724 23.4306 23.0122 19.872

Cgas Units %vd %vd %vd

Fuel Type

Fw 0 0 0 0.000

Fc 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw 0 0 0 0.000

Cgasw Units

Page 19 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Included Attachments:

Completeness Questions:

Attachments

EPA Method 1Location Supporting Documentation (Item 9) 

(optional)

Method 1 Location.pdf

Cyclonic Flow Absence Supporting Documentation (Item 10) Lubrizol_cycloniccheck.pdf

DGMs Calibrations , DTI Calibrations, and Nozzle Calibrations Lubrizol_Calibration.pdf

Sampling Locations Dimensions and Point Locations 14-295 Lubrizol Sampling Points.pdf

Run Field Data Sheets/Moisture Recovery Lubrizol_Lousiville_RunSheets.pdf

Lab Data Method 18 - Direct Interface.pdf

Lab Data Method 316.pdf

Lab Data Method 26A.pdf

Lab Data Method 18 -EG.pdf

Lab Data Method 18 - AA.pdf

Lab Data 0010.pdf

Lab Data D_Fs.pdf

Lab Data Method 0031.pdf

Chain-of-Custody Method 26A.pdf

Documentation of competence as an AETB or QI for 

stationary source testing.

METCO Cert - 2014-No FSMO.docx

Field Notes Lubrizol Log Book.xlsx

Reference Method Monitor Data ReferenceMEthodMOnitorData.pdf

Calibration Gas Certificates (Item 16) Reference Method Monitor Certificates.pdf

Results of audit sample analyses and Audit Provider 

evaluation reports

FinalReport80077.pdf

Completeness Quality Assessment Questions

As described in ASTM D7036-12 Standard Practice for 

Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies, does the 

testing firm meet the criteria as an AETB or is the person 

in charge of the field team a QI for the type of testing 

conducted? A certificate from an independent 

organization (e.g., Stack Testing Accreditation council 

(STAC), California Air Resources Board (CARB), National 

Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) 

Yes

Page 20 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

or self declaration provides documentation of competence 

as an AETB.

Is a description and drawing of test location provided? Yes

Has a description of deviations from published test 

methods been provided, or is there a statement that 

deviations were not required to obtain data 

representative of typical facility operation?

No No Method Deviations

Is a full description of the process and the unit being 

tested (including installed controls) provided?

No Separate Document

Has a detailed discussion of source operating conditions, 

air pollution control device operations and the 

representativeness of measurements made during the test 

been provided?

Yes

Were the operating parameters for the tested process unit 

and associated controls described and reported?

Yes Separate Document

Is there an assessment of the validity, representativeness, 

achievement of DQO's and usability of the data?

Yes

Have field notes addressing issues that may influence data 

quality been provided?

Yes

Have the following been included in the report: Dry Gas 

Meter (DGM) calibrations, pitot tuve and nozzle 

inspections?

No Combined Calibration Attachment for DGM and 

Nozzle Calibrations

Was the Method 1 sample point evaluation included in the 

report?

Yes

Were the cyclonic flow checks included in the report? Yes

Were the raw sampling data and test sheets included in 

the report?

Yes

Did the report include a description and flow diagram of 

the recovery procedures?

Yes

Was the laboratory certied/accredited to perform these 

analyses?

No The laboratories used for this testing have TNI 

accreditations, However Kentucky does not currently 

have a TNI requirement for "Air Laboratories"

Did the report include a complete laboratory report and 

flow diagram of sample analysis?

Yes

Were the chain-of-custody forms included in the report? Yes

Did the report include a complete description of the 

intrumental method sampling system?

Yes

Did the report include calibration gas certifications? Yes

Did the report include interference tests? Yes

Page 21 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Regulatory Review Questions:

Were the response time tests included in the report? Yes

Were the calibration error tests included in the report? Yes

Did the report include drift tests? Yes

Did the report include system bias tests? Yes

Were the converter efficiency tests included in the report? Yes

Did the report include statification checks? Yes

Did the report include the raw data for the instrumental 

method?

Yes

Regulatory Review Quality Assessment Questions

As described in ASTM D7036-12 Standard Practice for Competence of 

Air Emission Testing Bodies, does the testing firm meet the criteria as 

an AETB or is the person in charge of the field team a QI for the type of 

testing conducted? A certificate from an independent organization 

(e.g., STAC, CARB, NELAP) or self declaration provides documentation of 

competence as an AETB.

Was a representative of the regulatory agency on site during the test?

Is a description and drawing of test location provided?

Is there documentation that the source or the test company sought and 

obtained approval for deviations from the published test method prior 

to conducting the test or that the tester's assertion that deviations 

were not required to obtain data representative of operations that are 

typical for the facility?

Were all test method deviations acceptable?

Is a full description of the process and the unit being tested (including 

installed controls) provided?

Has a detailed discussion of source operating conditions, air pollution 

control device operations and the representativeness of measurements 

made during the test been provided?

Is there documentation that the required process monitors have been 

calibrated and that the calibration is acceptable?

Was the process capacity documented?

Was the process operating within an appropriate range for the test 

program objective?

Were process data concurrent with testing?

Page 22 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Were data included in the report for all parameters for which limits will 

be set?

Did the report discuss the representativeness of the facility operations, 

control device operation, and the measurements of the target 

pollutants, and were any changes from published test methods or 

process and control device monitoring protocols identified?

Were all sampling issues handled such that data quality was not 

adversely affected?

Was the DGM pre-test calibration within the criteria specified by the 

test method?

Was the DGM post-test calibration within the criteria specified by the 

test method?

Were thermocouple calibrations within method criteria?

Was the pitot tube inspection acceptable?

Were nozzle inspections acceptable?

Were flow meter calibrations acceptable?

Were the appropriate number and location of sampling points used?

Did the cyclonic flow evaluation show the presence of an acceptable 

average gas flow angle?

Were all data required by the method recorded?

Were required leak checks performed and did the checks meet method 

requirements?

Was the required minimum sample volume collected?

Did probe, filter, and impinger exit temperatures meet method criteria 

(as applicable)?

Did isokinetic sampling rates meet method criteria?

Was the sampling time at each point greater than 2 minutes and the 

same for each point?

Was the recovery process consistent with the method?

Were all required blanks collected in the field?

Where performed, were blank corrections handled per method 

requirements?

Were sample volumes clearly marked on the jar or measured and 

recorded?

Was the laboratory cerified/accredited to perform these analyses?

Did the laboratory note the sample volume upon receipt?

Page 23 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

If sample loss occurred, was the compensation method used, 

documented, and approved for the method?

Were the physical characteristics of the samples (e.g., color, volume, 

integrity, pH, temperature) recorded and consistent with the method?

Were sample hold times within method requirements?

Does the laboratory report document the analytical procedures and 

techniques?

Were all laboratory QA requirements documented?

Were analytical standards required by the method documented?

Were required laboratory duplicates within acceptable limits?

Were required spike recoveries within method requirements?

Were method-specific analytical blanks analyzed?

If problems occurred during analysis, is there sufficient documentation 

to conclude that the problems did not adversely affect the sample 

results?

Was the analytical detection limit specified in the test report?

Is the reported detection limit adequate fort he purposes of the test 

program?

Do the chain-of-custody forms indicate acceptable management of 

collected samples between collection and analysis?

Was a complete description of the sampling system provided?

Were calibration standards used prior to the end of the expiration date?

Did calibration standards meet method criteria?

Did interference checks meet method requirements?

Was a response time test performed?

Did calibration error tests meet method requirements?

Were drift tests performed after each run and did they meet method 

requirements?

Did system bias checks meet method requirements?

Was the NOX converter test acceptable?

Was a statification assessment performed?

Was the duration of each sample run within method criteria?

Page 24 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Was the appropriate traverse performed during sample collection, or 

was the probe placed at an appropriate center point (if allowed by the 

method)?

Were sample times at each point uniform and did they meet method 

requirements?

Were sample lines heated sufficiently to prevent potential adverse data 

quality issues?

Was all data required by the method recorded?

Page 25 of 26
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc

Page 26 of 26