Connecticut Regional Haze State Implementation Plan November 2009



### Attachment M

Technical Support Document for 2002 MANE-VU SIP Modeling Inventories, Version 3

## TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR 2002 MANE-VU SIP MODELING INVENTORIES, VERSION 3

Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 3622 Lyckan Parkway, Suite 2005 Durham, NC 27707

November 20, 2006

for the

Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Vi sibility Union (MANE-VU)[This page intentionally left blank.]iii CONTENTS

TABLES ......................................................................................................................... ............... vi

FIGURES........................................................................................................................ .............viii

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................... ix

CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1 A. What is the purpose of this TSD? ....................................................................................... 1 B. What are Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU Inventory?.................................... 2 C. How is this TSD organized? ............................................................................................... 3

CHAPTER II – POINT SOURCES................................................................................................ 4 A. General Methods for all State and Local Agencies ............................................................ 4

1. What Data Sources Were Used?................................................................................... 4 2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? ........................................................ 5 3. Version 3 Emissions Summary................................................................................... 18 B. State-Specific Methods ..................................................................................................... 2 0

1. Connecticut ................................................................................................................. 20

2. Delaware .................................................................................................................... . 21

3. District of Columbia ................................................................................................... 21

4. Maine ....................................................................................................................... ... 22 5. Maryland.................................................................................................................... . 22

6. Massachusetts ............................................................................................................. 23 7. New Hampshire .......................................................................................................... 23 8. New Jersey.................................................................................................................. 24

9. New York.................................................................................................................... 24 10. Pennsylvania (State, Excluding Alle gheny and Philadelphia Counties) .................... 25 11. Pennsylvania (Allegheny County, FIPS code 42003)................................................. 27 12. Pennsylvania (Philadelphi a County, FIPS code 42101) ............................................. 28

13. Rhode Island ............................................................................................................... 28

14. Vermont .................................................................................................................... .. 30

C. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions? .................................................. 30

CHAPTER III – AREA SOURCES ............................................................................................. 32

A. General Methods for all States.......................................................................................... 32

1. What Data Sources Were Used?................................................................................. 32 2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? ...................................................... 34

3. Version 3 Revisions .................................................................................................... 53 4. Version 3 Emissions Summary................................................................................... 57 B. State-Specific Methods ..................................................................................................... .. 58

1. Connecticut ................................................................................................................. 58

2. Delaware .................................................................................................................... . 59

3. District of Columbia ................................................................................................... 60

4. Maine ....................................................................................................................... ... 60 5. Maryland.................................................................................................................... . 61

6. Massachusetts ............................................................................................................. 62 7. New Hampshire .......................................................................................................... 63 8. New Jersey.................................................................................................................. 65

9. New York.................................................................................................................... 65 10. Pennsylvania ............................................................................................................... 70

11. Rhode Island ............................................................................................................... 71iv 12. Vermont .................................................................................................................... .. 72

C. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions? .................................................. 73

CHAPTER IV – NONROAD SOURCES .................................................................................... 75

A. General Methods for all States.......................................................................................... 75

1. What Data Sources Were Used?................................................................................. 75 2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed? ...................................................... 79

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries.................................................................................. 82 B. State-Specific Methods ..................................................................................................... 8 4

1. Connecticut ................................................................................................................. 84

2. Delaware .................................................................................................................... . 84

3. District of Columbia ................................................................................................... 85

4. Maine ....................................................................................................................... ... 86 5. Maryland.................................................................................................................... . 87

6. Massachusetts ............................................................................................................. 88 7. New Hampshire .......................................................................................................... 89 8. New Jersey.................................................................................................................. 89

9. New York.................................................................................................................... 90 10. Pennsylvania ............................................................................................................... 91

11. Rhode Island ............................................................................................................... 92

12. Vermont .................................................................................................................... .. 93

CHAPTER V – ONROAD SOURCES ........................................................................................ 94

A. General Methods for All States......................................................................................... 94

1. Data Sources ............................................................................................................... 9 4 2. What Quality Assurance Steps were Performed? ....................................................... 95

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries.................................................................................. 96 B. State-Specific Methods ..................................................................................................... .. 97

1. Connecticut ................................................................................................................. 97

2. Delaware .................................................................................................................... . 99

3. District of Columbia ................................................................................................. 100

4. Maine ....................................................................................................................... . 102 5. Maryland................................................................................................................... 1 03

6. Massachusetts ........................................................................................................... 105 7. New Hampshire ........................................................................................................ 106 8. New Jersey................................................................................................................ 10 8

9. New York.................................................................................................................. 11 0 10. Pennsylvania ............................................................................................................. 11 1

11. Rhode Island ............................................................................................................. 11 3

12. Vermont .................................................................................................................... 114

CHAPTER VI – BIOGE NIC SOURCES................................................................................... 117

A. General Methods for all States........................................................................................ 117

1. What Data Sources Were Used?............................................................................... 117 2. Version 3 Emissions Summary................................................................................. 118 B. State-Specific Methods ................................................................................................... 118 CHAPTER VII. TEMPORAL, SPECIATION, AND SPATIAL ALLOCATION PROFILES AND PREPARATION OF SMOKE (IDA) AND RPO DATA EXCHANGE PROTOCOL (NIF 3.0) FORMATS ............................................................................... 119 A. Temporal Profiles........................................................................................................... . 119

1. Point and Area Sources............................................................................................. 119v 2. Nonroad Sources....................................................................................................... 120

3. Onroad Sources......................................................................................................... 120 B. Speciation Profiles ......................................................................................................... . 121

1. Point and Area Sources............................................................................................. 121

2. Nonroad Sources....................................................................................................... 121

3. Onroad Sources......................................................................................................... 121 C. Spatial Allocation Profiles .............................................................................................. 122 D. Preparation of SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) Formats .. 122

CHAPTER VIII. METHODS FOR AREAS OUT SIDE OF THE M ANE-VU REGION ..... 155

CHAPTER IX. REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 157

APPENDIX A - POINT SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT....................................................................A-1

APPENDIX B - AREA SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT....................................................................B-1

APPENDIX C - NONROAD SOURCE INVENT ORY, VERSION 3: FINAL COUNTY, MONTHLY NATIONAL MOBILE INVENTORY MODEL (NMIM) INPUTS TEMPORAL

PROFILES FOR POINT AND AREA SOURCES....................................................................C-1vi TABLES

Table II-1. Description of the Field Names and Descripti ons for the SCC Control Device

Ratios Table ................................................................................................................... ... 14

Table II-2. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Point Source Emissions by State.................................. 19

Table II-3. Connecticut 2002 Poin t, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 20 Table II-4. Delaware 2002 Point, Version 3: Uni que List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.......................................................................................................................... ....... 21 Table II-5. District of Columbia 2002 Point, Vers ion 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type .................................................................................................................. 21 Table II-6. Maine 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.......................................................................................................................... ....... 22 Table II-7. Maryland 2002 Point, Version 3: Uni que List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.......................................................................................................................... ....... 22 Table II-8. Massachusetts 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 23 Table II-9. New Hampshire 2002 Po int, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 23 Table II-10. New Jersey 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Star t Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 24

Table II-11. New York 2002 Poin t, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type .................................................................................................................. 25 Table II-12. Pennsylvania 2002 Poin t, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 26 Table II-13. Pennsylvania - Allegheny County 2002 Poin t, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types ......................................................................................... 27 Table II-14. Pennsylvania - Phil adelphia County 2002 Point, Versi on 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................ 28 Table II-15. Rhode Island 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Star t Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 30 Table II-16. Vermont 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Star t Date, End Date, and Emission Types.......................................................................................................................... ....... 30 Table III-1. Summary of MANE-V U-Sponsored Inventories Include d in Version 1 of the Area Source Consolidated Emissions Inventory ....................................................................... 41

Table III-2. Area Source Industr ial, Commercial/Institutional, and Residential Fossil Fuel

Combustion Uncontrolled Emission Factors for PM10-PRI/FIL, PM25-PRI/FIL, and

PM-CON......................................................................................................................... .. 44

Table III-3. SCCs for which PM25-PRI Emissions were Estimated by Applying a Ratio to the PM10-PRI Emissions in the State inventory .................................................................... 49

Table III-4. Revisions to PM 25-PRI and PM25-FIL Emissions for Paved and Unpaved Roads

and Construction ............................................................................................................... 56

Table III-5. Version 3 2002 MANE- VU Area Source Emissions by State ................................. 57

Table III-6. Connecticut 2002 Ar ea, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 58 Table III-7. Delaware 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Star t Date, End Date, and Emission Types.......................................................................................................................... ....... 59vii Table III-8. District of Columbia 2002 Area, Vers ion 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types .......................................................................................................... 60 Table III-9. Maine 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.......................................................................................................................... ....... 60 Table III-10. Maryland 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 61

Table III-11. Massachusetts 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 62 Table III-12. New Hampshire 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Star t Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 64 Table III-13. New Jersey 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Star t Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 65 Table III-14. New York 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 66 Table III-15. Summary of Ne w York's Revisions to Version 3 of MANE-VU's Area Source Inventory...................................................................................................................... ..... 68 Table III-16. Pennsylvania 2002 Ar ea, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 70 Table III-17. Rhode Island 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types................................................................................................................. 71 Table III-18. Vermont 2002 Area, Version 3: Uni que List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types.......................................................................................................................... ....... 72 Table IV-1. List of Unique Ai rcraft, Commercial Marine, an d Locomotive SCCs Reported by

States in MANE- VU Inventory ........................................................................................ 76 Table IV-2. Summary of Basis for 2002 M ANE-VU Aircraft, Comm ercial Marine, and Locomotive Inventory....................................................................................................... 77

Table IV-3. Data Source Code Descriptions................................................................................ 82

Table IV-4. Annual 2002 Nonroad Sect or Emissions by MANE-VU State................................ 82

Table IV-5. Annual 2002 NONROAD2005 Mode l Emissions by MANE-VU State ................. 83 Table IV-6. Annual 2002 Aircraft, Commerci al Marine, and Locomotive Emissions by

MANE-VU State............................................................................................................... 83

Table IV-7. Delaware NONROAD External Data Files............................................................... 85 Table IV-8. Maryland NONROA D External Data Files ............................................................. 87

Table V-1. Annual 2002 Onroad Sector Emissions by MANE-VU State................................... 97

Table V-2. Connecticut Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files..................................................... 98

Table V-3. Delaware Onroad Da ta in SMOKE Input Files....................................................... 100

Table V-4. District of Columbia On road Data in SMOKE Input Files ..................................... 101 Table V-5. Maine Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ............................................................ 102 Table V-6. Maryland Onroad Da ta in SMOKE Input Files....................................................... 104

Table V-7. Massachusetts Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ............................................... 105 Table V-8. New Hampshire Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ............................................ 107 Table V-9. New Jersey Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files.................................................... 108

Table V-10. New York Onroad Da ta in SMOKE Input Files.................................................... 110 Table V-11. Pennsylvania Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files............................................... 112

Table V-12. Rhode Island Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ............................................... 113

Table V-13. Vermont Onroad Da ta in SMOKE Input Files ...................................................... 115

Table VI-1. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Biogenic Source Emissions by State ........................ 118viii Table VII-1. Profiles, Cross-references, and Documentation for Model Inputs for Version 3 of 2002 MANE-VU Inventory ............................................................................................ 123 Table VII-2. Point Source Tempor al Cross-reference Additions .............................................. 126

Table VII-3. Unknown SCCs in the M ANE-VU Point Source Inventory.................................. 130 Table VII-4. Area Source Tempor al Cross-Reference Updates ................................................ 131 Table VII-5. Area Source Tempor al Cross-Reference Additions.............................................. 136

Table VII-6. Area Source Tem poral Cross-Reference and Prof ile Additions for the MANE-VU Inventory...................................................................................................................... ... 141 Table VII-7. Point Source Speci ation Profiles Added to Speciati on Cross-reference File for CBIV with PM Mechanism.................................................................................................. 151 Table VII-8. Point Source SCCs Lacking Speci ation Profile Assignments for CB-IV with PM

Mechanism...................................................................................................................... 152 Table VII-9. Summary of Version 3 Mass Emissions and SMOKE Input Files ....................... 153 Table VII-10. Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emissi on Type Combinations for Daily

Emissions in the MANE-VU 2002 Point and Area Source Inventories, Version 3 ....... 154 Table VIII-1. Description of Non-MANE-VU Region Invent ory Data Used for MANE-VU BaseB Modeling.............................................................................................................. 156 Table C-1. MANE-VU County, Mont hly NMIM/NONROAD Inputs...................................... C-2

FIGURES

Figure 1. MANE-VU 12-Kilome ter CMAQ Modeling Domain ................................................... 2 Figure VIII-1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domain........................................ 155ix ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ATP Anaerobic Thermal Processor BEIS Biogenic Emissions Inventory System

CAA Clean Air Act

CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule

CAMD Clean Air Markets Division CAP criteria air pollutant CE Control Equipment (NIF 3.0) table CEM Continuous Emissions Monitoring CENRAP Central Regional Air Planning Organization CERR Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule CMU Carnegie Mellon University CNG compressed natural gas

CO carbon monoxide

CO 2 carbon dioxide

EF emission factor

EFIG Emission Factor s and Inventory Group EGU electricity generating unit EI inventory EM Emission (NIF 3.0) table EP Emission Process (NIF 3.0) table EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ERP Emission Release Point (NIF 3.0) table ETBE ethyl tertiary butyl ether

ETOH ethanol ETS Emission Tracking System EU Emission Unit (NIF 3.0) table FIPS Federal Information Processing Standard

FIRE Factor Information and REtrieval Factor GIS geographic information system GSE ground support equipment HAP hazardous air pollutant HC hydrocarbon HPMS Highway Performance Monitoring System

ID identification IDA Inventory Data Analyzer format I/M inspection and maintenance

km kilometer

LAI leaf area indices

LEV low emission vehicle LPG liquified petroleum gas

MACT maximum achievab le control technology

MANE-VU Mid-Atlantic/Nor theast Visibility Union MARAMA Mid-Atlantic Regiona l Air Management Association MTBE methyl tertiary butyl ether NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard

NAICS North American Indus trial Classification Systemx NEI National Emissions Inventory

NH 3 ammonia NIF NEI Input Format NMIM National Mobile Inventory Model

NO nitrous oxide

NO

x oxides of nitrogen NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ORIS Office of Regulatory Information Systems OTC Ozone Transport Commission PAR photosynthetic active radiation PE Emission Period (NIF 3.0) table Pechan E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. PFC portable fuel container PM particulate matter

PM-CON condensible PM

PM 10 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a

nominal 10 micrometers

PM10-FIL filterable PM 10 PM10-PRI primary PM 10 PM 2.5 particulate matter with an aerodynami c diameter less than or equal to a

nominal 2.5 micrometers

PM25-FIL filterable PM 2.5 PM25-PRI primary PM 2.5 POTWs public owned treatment works ppm parts per million psi pounds per square inch QA quality assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan RPO Regional Planning Organization RVP Reid vapor pressure

SCC Source Classification Code SPDPRO speed profile SPDREF speed cross reference SI Site (NIF 3.0) table

SIC Standard Industrial Classification SIP State Implementation Plan

S/L State and Local SMOKE Sparse Matrix Op erator Kernel Emissions

SO 2 sulfur dioxide TAME tertiary amyl methyl ether TR Transmittal (NIF 3.0) table TSD technical support document

U.S. United States VISTAS Visibility Improve ment State and Tribal Association of the Southeast

VMT vehicle miles traveled VOC volatile organic compound WRAP Western Regional Air Partnership1 CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION

A. What is the purpose of this TSD?

This technical support document (TSD) explains the data sources, methods, and results for preparing Version 3 of the 2002 base year cr iteria air pollutant (CAP) and ammonia (NH 3 ) emissions inventories for poi nt, area, onroad, nonroad, and biogenic sources for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) Regional Planning Organization (RPO). The MANE-VU region includes Connect icut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Local air planning agencies in clude Philadelphia and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The region also includes the Penob scot Tribe of Maine Indian Nation (Tribal code 018) and the St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York (Tribal code 007). However, these tribal authorities did not provide any data for the 2002 MANE- VU inventory. MANE-VU

will use these inventories to support air quality m odeling, State Implementation Plan (SIP) development, and implementation activities for the regional haze rule and fine particulate matter (PM) and ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

The inventories and supporting data prepared include the following:

(1) Comprehensive, county-level, mass emissi ons and modeling inventories for of 2002

emissions for CAPs and NH 3 for the State and Local (S/L) agencies included in the MANE-VU region; (2) The temporal, speciation, and spatial a llocation profiles for the MANE-VU region inventories; (3) Inventories for wildfires, prescribed bur ning, and agricultural field burning for the southeastern provinces of Canada; and (4) Inventories for other RPOs, Canada, and Mexico.

The mass emissions inventory files were prepar ed in the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Input Format Version 3.0 (NIF 3.0). The modeli ng inventory files were prepared in Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions/Inventory Da ta Analyzer (SMOKE/IDA) format. Ancillary files (holding spatial, temporal, and specia tion profile data) were prepared in SMOKE/IDA compatible format. Figure 1 shows the Models -3 Community Multiscal e Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ) modeling domain for the MANE-VU region.

The inventories include annual em issions for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), oxides of nitrogen (NO

x ), volatile organic compounds ( VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), NH 3 , and particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 and 2.5 micrometers (i.e., primary PM 10 and PM 2.5 ). The inventories included summer day, winter day, and average day emissions. However, not all agencies included daily emissions in their inventories, a nd, for the agencies that did, the temporal basis for the daily emissions va ried between agencies. The temporal profiles prepared for this project will be used to calcu late daily emissions when not available in the inventory files.2 Figure 1. MANE-VU 12-Kilome ter CMAQ Modeling Domain

B. What are Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU Inventory?

Work on Version 1 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventor y began in April 2004. The consolidated inventory for point, area, onr oad, and nonroad sources was prepared by starting with the inventories that S/L agencies submitted to th e United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from May through July of 2004 as a requirement of the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR). The EPA’s format and content quality assuranc e (QA) programs (and other QA checks not included in EPA’s QA softwa re) were run on each inventory to identify format and/or data content issues (EPA, 2004a). E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. (Pechan) worked with the MANE-VU S/L agencies and the staff of the Mid- Atlantic Regional Air Management Association (MARAMA) to resolve QA issues and augment the inventories to fill data gaps in accordance with the Quality Assura nce Project Plan (QAPP) prepared for this project (MANE-VU, 2004a). MARAMA is th e MANE-VU organization’s employees, whereas3 MANE-VU is the member S/L agencies plus MA RAMA employees. MARAMA is one of three RPOs (in addition to Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) and North East States for Coordinated Air Use Management) supporti ng the MANE-VU effort.

A draft of the point and area so urce inventories and summary file s were provided for stakeholder review during August 2004. Stakeholder comments were reviewed by the S/L agencies and revisions to the inventory files were made to the files to inco rporate stakeholder comments as approved by each S/L agency. The inventorie s were finalized during December 2004 and the SMOKE input files were prepared and review ed by the modelers during December 2004 and early January 2005. The final inventory and SMOKE input files were finalized during January

2005.

Work on Version 2 (covering the period fr om April through September 2005) involved incorporating revisions requested by some S/L agencies on the poi nt, area, and onroad inventories. Work on Version 3 (covering the period from December 2005 through April 2006) included additional revisions to the point, area, and onroad inventories as requested by some states. Thus, the Version 3 inventory for poi nt, area, and onroad s ources were built upon

Versions 1 and 2. This work also included deve lopment of the biogenics inventory. Version 3 of the nonroad inventory was completely redone due to changes that EPA made to the

NONROAD2005 model.

C. How is this TSD organized?

Chapters II through V of this TSD present th e general and State-specific methods and data sources used to develop Version 3 of MANE-V U’s 2002 inventory for point, area, nonroad, and onroad sources. Chapter VI presents the methods, data sources, and model used to develop the biogenics inventory. Chapter VII documents th e temporal allocation, speciation, and spatial allocation modeling input files used for Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 2002 invent ory for all sectors. Chapter VIII describes the non-MANE-VU regi on inventory data used for MANE-VU BaseB Modeling. References for the TSD are provided in Chapter IX. Appendices A and B provide the QA Summary Report files prepared during developm ent of the State-specific inventories for point and area sources, respectively. Appendices A and B also provide ta bles that identify for each S/L agency, the Version 3 data sources, emi ssion type period, pollutant, and the number of counties by source classification code (SCC). For the nonroad inventor y, Appendix C provides the final county, monthly National Mobile I nventory Model (NMIM) inputs provided or confirmed by the States for Reid vapor pressu re (RVP), weight percent oxygen, and gasoline

sulfur.4 CHAPTER II

– POINT SOURCES

A. General Methods for all State and Local Agencies

1. What Data Sources Were Used?

Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU point source inve ntory is based primarily on Version 1 with some state-specific revisions incorporated into Versions 2 and 3. Version 1 was developed using the inventories that S/L agencies submitted to EPA from May through July of 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. All 12 State agencies submitted point source inventories to EPA. In addition, Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania each submitted their own point source inventories to EPA. The EPA performed some limited QA review of the S/L inventories to identify format, referential integrity, and duplicate record issues. The EPA revised the

inventories to address these issu es and made the file s available to the S/L agencies on August 6, 2004. These inventory files were used as the starting point for Version 1 of the MANE-VU inventory. These inventory files were obtained from EPA, consolid ated into a single data set, subjected to extensive QA review, revised (a s approved by the MANE-VU S/L agencies) to address QA issues and to fill data gaps identifi ed while preparing Version 1. Subsequently, the following agencies provided revisions to their point source inventories:

• Version 2 – Connecticut, Delaware, and Maryland

• Version 3 – Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island

The revisions that these states provided for Versions 2 and 3 are discussed in the “State-Specific Methods” section of this chapter.

In order to track the origin of data, the temporal period of emissions, and to facilitate generation of emission summaries, the following NIF plus fields were added to the Transmittal (TR), Site (SI), Emission Unit (EU), Emission Release Point (ER), Emission Process (EP), Emission Period (PE), Emission (EM), and Control Equipment (CE) tables:

• Data Source Codes:

Code Description

S State agency-supplied data. L Local agency-supplied data to inco rporate S/L comments for individual

records.

P NH 3 emissions from MANE-VU inventory for cement kilns. AUG-A PM Augmentation: ad-hoc change. AUG-C PM Augmentation: standard augmentation method. AUG-O PM Augmentation: set PMxx-FIL = PMxx-PRI for SCCs starting with 10 (external fuel combustion) and 20 (i nternal fuel combustion). Note: emission factors and particle-size data for estimating condensible

emissions for fuel combustion SCCs st arting with 30 were not available; therefore, condensible emissions were not estimated for these processes5 if an agency provided filterable and not primary emissions for these processes. In other words, the prim ary emissions were assumed to equal

the filterable emissions. AUG-Z PM Augmentation: automated fill-in of zero values where all PM for a particular process is zero.

• Revision Date: This field indicates the m onth and year during wh ich the last revision

was made to a record.

• State Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS): This field indicates the state

FIPS code of the submittal.

• County FIPS: This field indicates th e county FIPS code of the submittal.

The following NIF plus fields we re added to the EM table:

• Emission Ton Value: This field indicates th e values of the emissi ons in tons. This field was used to prepare summaries of emissions on a consistent EU basis.

• Emission Type Period: This field indicates the period of the Emission Type – either

ANNUAL or NONANNUAL. This field was used to prepare summaries of annual

emissions.

• CAP_HAP: This field identifies records for CAP versus records for hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). For the MANE-VU inventor y, the flag is CAP for all records.

• Year: This field indicates the year of the data; for this inventory, it is 2002.

Note that the QAPP for Version 1 includes more da ta source codes than were used in Version 3 of the point source inventory. The data sour ce codes listed above ar e the codes used in Version 3. The exception is for Rhode Island, who requested that their Version 2 inventory be replaced with its inventory included in the fi nal 2002 NEI prepared by EPA. Thus, for Rhode Island, it was agreed to maintain the data sour ce codes used in the NEI in Version 3 of the MANE-VU inventory. The data source codes for Rhode Island’ s point source inventory are explained under the state-specif ic section for Rhode Island.

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?

A QAPP was prepared and approved by MANE- VU/MARAMA and the EP A Regional Office prior to initiating work on Version 1 of the inventory (M ANE-VU, 2004a). This QAPP was followed during preparation of a ll three versions of the invent ory. This section provides an overview of the QA checks completed on each ve rsion of the inventory. The QA process for each S/L inventory involved the following steps:

• Conduct QA checks on each S/L inventory;

• Prepare a QA Summary Report for subm ittal to the agency for review;6 • Revise the inventory to resolve QA issues as directed by the agency;

• Repeat the QA checks on the revised inventor y to verify that the corrections were completed;

• Perform augmentation to co rrect for missing data; and

• Repeat the QA checks to verify that th e augmentation was completed correctly.

a. QA checks for S/L agency inventories

The following discusses the QA diagnoses that were run on the conso lidated point source inventory data set. For each S/L agency, a “QA Summary Report” was prepared for each QA

check in an Excel Workbook file. The results of each QA check was summarized in a separate spreadsheet and submitted to the S/L agency for review and resolution. The agencies provided

corrections to the data in the Excel files or via e-mail and the inventory was updated with the

corrections.

i. Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) Analysis

The goal of this analysis was to compare annual NO

x and SO 2 emissions that were measured with CEM systems and reported to EPA to the annual NO

x and SO 2 emissions reported in the S/L inventories. Facilities repor t hourly CEM data to EPA for uni ts that are subject to CEM reporting requirements of the NO

x SIP Call rule and Title IV of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Thus, hourly CEM emissions were summed to the annual level and compared to the annual emissions in the S/L inventories. If the S/L agencies ag reed, the CEM hourly emissions would be used to support air quality modeling to accurately reflec t the temporal distribution of emissions from CEM units during 2002. Since some of the states re quire facilities to cert ify the emissions they report for inclusion in the invent ory, the agencies needed proof that the emissions in the CEM inventory compared well with the emissions in the S/L inventory.

The 2002 CEM inventory containing hourly NO

x and SO 2 emissions and heat input data were

downloaded from the EPA/Clean Air Ma rkets Division’s (CAMD) web site (www.epa.gov/airmarkets) on July 8, 2004 (CAMD, 2004). The data were provided by quarter and state resulting in 48 separate files for the 12 states in the MANE-VU region. For each state, the hourly emissions were summed to the annual level by facility and EU.

The first stage in the CEM analysis involved prep aring a crosswalk file to match facilities and units in the CEM inventory to f acilities and units in the S/L inve ntories. In the CEM inventory, the Office of Regulatory Information Systems (ORI S) identification (ID) code identifies unique facilities and the unit ID identifies unique boilers and internal combustion engines (i.e., turbines and reciprocating engines). In the S/L inventorie s, the state and county FIPS and state facility ID together identify unique facilities and the EU ID id entifies unique boilers or internal combustion engines. However, in some of the S/L inventories, the emissions for multiple EUs were summed and reported under the same EU ID. Thus, an Ex cel Workbook was sent to the S/L agencies that

contained an initial crosswalk with the ORIS ID and unit ID in the CEM inventory matched to the state and county FIPS, state facility ID, and EU ID in the S/L inventory. Agencies were asked to confirm/correct/supplement the information in the crosswalk. The initial crosswalk also contained annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM emissions and flags that indicated if7 CEM units were subject to re porting requirements under the NO

x SIP Call and/or Title IV of the

CAA. It should be noted that the initial matc hing of the IDs in both inventories was based on previous crosswalks that had been devel oped for the 1999 NEI and in-house information compiled by Pechan. The matching at the facili ty level was nearly complete; however, S/L agency assistance was needed to match most of CEM units to EUs in the S/L inventories.

The crosswalk was updated with corrections to fa cility and CEM unit-to-EU matches, and with new matches provided by the S/L agencies. The matching of each CEM unit to an EU was still incomplete. Consequently, the comparison of an nual emissions was performed at the facility

level.

The second stage in the CEM analysis was to prepare an Excel Workbook file for each S/L agency that compared the annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM inventory to the annual emissions reported in the S/L inventory. The file included three spreadsheets that compared annual emissions at the facility level, listed the facilities in the CEM inventory that

could not be matched to the facilities in the S/ L inventory, and listed the facilities in the S/L inventory identified as an elec tricity generating unit (EGU) that could not be matched to a facility in the CEM inventory. Th e Excel files were sent to the S/ L agencies for review. The S/L agencies then indicated if they did or did not want to use the hourly CEM inventory.

The facility-level comparison of CEM to emission inventory NO

x and SO 2 emissions found that for some facilities, the annual emissions fr om the S/L inventory exceeded the CEM annual emissions because the facility in the S/L invent ory contained more than just CEM units. This condition was determined to be acceptable. Howe ver, S/L agencies were asked to review data

for facilities where the CEM emissions were hi gher than the emissions summed from the S/L inventory. For these cases, CEM emissions may be higher than those repor ted in a S/L inventory due to methods EPA uses for using artificially high default values to fill in hourly CEM data when not reported or when a CEM unit was not working properly.

After reviewing the comparison of the CEM to S/L inventory emissions, New York and Vermont elected to use the 2002 CEM inventory containing hourly NO

x and SO 2 emissions for all facilities. Maryland; New Hampshire; and Al legheny County, Pennsylvania elected to use the

2002 CEM data for some but not all of the fac ilities within their ju risdiction. The Excel Workbook files containing the comparison of CEM to S/L inventories pr ovides a spreadsheet identifying the facilities for which these S/L agencies elected to us e the CEM inventory.

Subsequent to the completion of this analysis, it was determined that the structure of the EPA/CAMD file would not be compatible with the format of the SMOKE input file. The

database structure did not affect the annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM emissions used in the comparison to S/L inventory data. Fo r each of the S/L agencies that elected to use the 2002 CEM data, CAMD agreed to provide sepa rate database files for each state with a structure compatible with the SMOKE input file fo rmat. Pechan then used the crosswalk to add to the CEM inventory files the state and county FIPS, state facility ID , and EU ID (if the crosswalk contains a CEM unit to EU match) to the hourly CEM database files provided by

CAMD. The modified database was then used to create the SMOKE input files for these states.8 Note that Delaware requested that the 2002 CEM inventory for its facilities not be used for regional haze modeling. However, if the consolid ated point source invent ory prepared under this project is used to support oz one episode modeling, Delaware may consider using the CEM hourly data for the episodes modeled. Theref ore, the 2002 CEM inventory was also processed

for Delaware’s facilities.

ii. PM Emissions Consiste ncy and Completeness Review

The following consistency checks were performed at the EM table data key level (for annual emissions) to compare PM emissions:

• If a process was associated with a PM em ission record, but was missing one or more of the following (as appropriate for the S CC [i.e., condensible PM (PM-CON) is associated with fuel combustion only]): filterable PM 10 (PM10-FIL), primary PM 10 (PM10-PRI), filterable PM 2.5 (PM25-FIL), primary PM 2.5 (PM25-PRI), or PM-CON, the record was flagged for review.

• The following equations were used to determine consistency:

PM10-FIL + PM-CON = PM10-PRI

PM25-FIL + PM-CON = PM25-PRI

PM-FIL + PM-CON = PM-PRI

• The following comparisons were app lied to determine consistency:

PM10-PRI >= PM10-FIL

PM25-PRI >= PM25-FIL

PM10-PRI >= PM-CON

PM25-PRI >= PM-CON

PM10-FIL >= PM25-FIL

PM10-PRI >= PM25-PRI

PM-PRI >= PM10-PRI

PM-PRI >= PM25-PRI

PM-FIL >= PM10-FIL

PM-FIL >= PM25-FIL

If the data failed one of these checks it was diagnosed as an e rror, summarized in an Excel Workbook file, and provided to the S/L agency for corrections. If a S/L agency did not provide corrections to these errors, the errors were corrected or filled in according to the augmentation procedures.9 iii. ERP Coordinate Review

Location coordinates for point sources were ev aluated using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to determine if th e coordinates were w ithin 0.5-kilometers of the boundary of the county in which the source was located. If not , the S/L agency was asked to review the coordinates and provide corrections to either the coordinates or the state and county FIPS codes.

The 0.5-kilometer test resulted in a large number of ERPs for review by the agencies. Therefore, to assist S/L agencies in priori tizing their review of coordinates, ERP records with coordinates located more than 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 or more kilometers from their county boundary, and coordinates that mapped outside of their stat e boundary were identified. Annual emissions summed to the ERP level were included in the QA Summary Report to identify records with zero emissions for all pollutants and to identify the highest emitting stacks. The QA Summary Report was provided to the S/L agency for review and corrections.

iv. ERP Parameter Review

The EPA’s QA guidance for diagnosing ERP issu es for the point source NEI (EPA, 2004b) was applied to identify QA issues in the S/L point source inventories. The QA guidance involved diagnosing the correct assignment of the ERP type (i.e., stack or fugitive), parameters with zero values, parameters not within the range of values specified in the EPA’s QA procedures, and consistency checks (i.e., comparing calculated values against the values reported in the inventory). In many cases errors were caused by missing or zero values. In other cases, out-ofrange errors were caused by unit conversion issues (e.g., stack parameters were in ft, ft/sec, cu ft/sec, or degrees Fahrenheit). The QA issues were summari zed in a separate QA Summary Report for each agency and each agency was asked to provide corrections. If an agency did not provide corrections for out-of-range or missing values, the data were corrected or filled in according to the ERP augmentation procedures.

v. Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data Review

The CE codes in the “Primary Device Type C ode” and “Secondary Device Type Code” fields were reviewed to identify invalid codes (i.e., co des that did not exist in the NIF 3.0 reference table) and missing codes (e.g., records with a nu ll or uncontrolled code of 000 but with control efficiency data).

QA review of control efficiency data involved dia gnosis of two types of errors. First, records were reviewed to identify control efficiency values that were reported as a decimal rather than as a percent value. Records with control efficien cies with decimal values were flagged as a potential error (although not necessarily an error, since the real control efficiency may be less than 1%).

The second check identified reco rds where 100% control was reporte d in the CE table, but the emissions in the EM table were greater than zero and the rule effectiveness value in the EM table was null, zero, or 100% (implying 100% control of emissions). Because many agencies did not populate the rule effectiveness field or a default value of zero was assigned, records with null or

zero rule effectiveness values were included wh ere the CE was 100% and emissions were greater10 than zero. The records that met these criteria were summarized in a QA Summary Report for review and correction, if necessary, by the S/L agency.

vi. Start and End Date Checks

QA review was conducted to identify start date and end date values in the PE and EM tables to confirm consistency with the inventory year in th e TR table, and to confirm that the end date reported was greater than the star t date reported. This check di d not identify any QA issues in the three versions of the inventory.

vii. Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison

The following QA checks were conducted to iden tify potential errors associated with the incorrect reporting of dail y and/or annual emissions:

• Any “DAILY” type record that is grea ter than its associ ated “ANNUAL”.

A review of the daily vs. annual comparison reve aled that in many cases, the daily value was nonzero (but very small), but the annual value was zero. This was generally a result of rounding in a S/L agency’s original emissions database, where annual records were recorded in tons per year to a set number of decima l places, while the co rresponding daily records were recorded in pounds per year to a set number of decimal places. The annual record rounds to zero in the original database, while the daily value re mains non-zero. A tolerance check reveals the following (comparison in tons):

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> 0

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .000001

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .00001

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .0001

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .001

• Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .01

For Version 1, the affected S/L agencies were as follows:

• Connecticut (09) 11 records

• Maine (23) 4 records

• Maryland (24) 72 records

• New Jersey (34) 2935 records

• Pennsylvania Allegheny County (42003) 17 records

• Pennsylvania Philadelphia County (42101) 146 records

• Rhode Island (44) 1 record

Rhode Island, Philadelphia, and Ne w Jersey responded that the dailie s that were greater than the annuals could be deleted. Maryland determined that they should be ke pt since the difference

values were small. The records for the remain ing S/L agencies were kept. This QA issue only occurred during processing of Version 1.11 b. Responses from S/L agencies

Each S/L agency reviewed its “QA Summary Report” files and the S/L agency provided direction for correcting QA issues either in the QA Summary Report Excel files or via e-mail. The inventory was then revised to incorporate responses from each agency and the QA checks were run again to verify that the QA issues were addressed. If an agency responded to a QA issue by e-mail, the direction was recorded in the “QA Summary Re port” file. The “QA Summary Report” file for each S/L agency was updated to document QA issues and resolution of issues associated with developing Versions 2 and 3 of the point sour ce inventory. The “QA Summary Report” files for Version 3 are provided with this report in a separate zip file. The files in the zip file are organized in separate folders for each S/L agency. Each folder includes a separate Excel workbook file for the following QA checks if a QA issue existed:

• PM Augmentation QA Summary;

• Stack Parameter QA Summary;

• Stack Coordinates QA Summary;

• Stack Parameter and Coordina te Augmentation Summary;

• CEM Comparisons and Revisions; and

• Control Device/Efficiency Summary.

c. Gap Filling and Augmentation

The following discusses the augmentation procedures that were used to fill in missing data that were not supplied by the S/L agencies. The S/L agencies approved the procedures before they were applied. These procedures were applied af ter revising the inventor y to address QA issues as directed by each S/L agency.

i. MANE-VU-Sponsored Inventories

MANE-VU prepared a 2002 NH 3 emissions inventory for cement kilns for SCCs 30500606 and

30500706 located in four MANE-VU states. Maryland chose to add one new facility 24013/0012 (state and county FIPS code /facility ID). New York chose to add the following three sites 36001/4010300016, 36001/4012400001, and 36111/3514800084. Maine and Pennsylvania chose not to add emissions from th is inventory. The datafor Maryland and New

York were added to Version 1. These data were not changed in Versions 2 and 3 of the point source inventory.

ii. PM Augmentation

The PM augmentations process gap-fills missing PM pollutant complements. For example, if a S/L agency provided only PM10-PRI pollutants the PM augmentation process filled in the PM25-PRI pollutants. The steps in the PM augmentation process were as follows:

• Step 1: Initial QA and remediati on of S/L provided PM pollutants;12 • Step 2: Development of PM factor ra tios based on factors from the Factor Information and REtrieval (FIRE) Data Sy stem, version 6.2, and the PM Calculator (EPA, 2003a; EPA, 2004c);

• Step 3: Implementation of the ra tios developed in step 2.; and

• Step 4: Presentation of PM augmentation results to S/L agencies for review and

comment.

An Access database (named Reference Tables for PM Augmentation ) accompanies this

document. This database contains the SCC C ontrol Device Ratio table, the Emission Factors table, and Emission Factors Crosst ab table discussed in Step 2. The Emission Factors Crosstab

table contains the ratios devel oped from the Emission Factors tabl e. The Emission Factors table

contains detailed information on the emission f actors used to develop the ratios. The PM

Calculator ratio table can be provided upon request – it contains all possible combinations for SCC and Control Device types th at are available in the PM Calculator. Ratios from the PM calculator were developed us ing a standard input of 100 TONS of uncontrolled PM-FIL

emissions.

1. Initial QA and Remediation of PM Pollutants

S/L agencies were initially presented with file s that detailed potenti al inconsistencies and missing information in their PM pollutant invent ory. Inconsistencies in PM pollutants include the following:

• PM-PRI less than PM10-PRI, PM25-PR I, PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, or PM-CON;

• PM-FIL less than PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL;

• PM10-PRI less than PM25-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL or PM-CON;

• PM10-FIL less than PM25-FIL;

• PM25-PRI less than PM25-FIL or PM-CON;

• The sum of PM10-FIL and PM-CON not equal to PM10-PRI; and

• The sum of PM25-FIL and PM-CON not equal to PM25-PRI.

Potential missing information was summarized in a table which detailed the variety of cases provided by each S/L agency. For example, an S/L agency might have provided PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL for some processes, but provide d only PM10-FIL for other processes.

S/L agencies were asked to review this informa tion and provide corrections where possible. In general, corrections (or general directions) were provided in the case of the potential inconsistency issues. An exam ple of a general direction pr ovided by a S/L agency was to remove PM25-FIL where greater than PM10-FIL because the PM10- FIL was (in their particular case) known to be more reliable. In other ca ses, the agency-provided specific process-level pollutant corrections. If specifi c direction was not provided by the agency, zero PM pollutants were generally removed, or complement s were set equal to the higher number.13 2. Development of PM Factor Ratio

The primary deliverable of this step of the process was the development of a table keyed by SCC, primary control device, and secondary contro l device. This table is called the SCC Control Device Ratios table (see Table II-1). This ta ble was filled according to the following steps:

• Ratios (both condensible and noncondensible ) were added from FIRE for SCCs starting with 10* (external fuel combustion) and 20* (internal fuel combustion) where there was a direct match between the pr ovided SCC, and primary and secondary

control devices.

• Ratios (non-condensable) were added from th e PM Calculator for SCCs starting with

10* and 20* where there was not a direct match between the provided SCC, and primary and secondary control devices. C ondensible ratios were added from the PM

Calculator based on the unc ontrolled SCC for these SCCs. In some cases, it was necessary to map the SCC and control device s to the PM calculator to find a match

for the noncondensible ratios. In other cas es, it was necessary to map the SCC to

FIRE to find a match for condensible ratios.

• For natural gas, process gas, and liquified petroleum ga s (LPG) SCCs starting with10* and 20*, it was assumed (based on FIRE emission factors) that the PMPRI/PM10-PRI/PM25-PRI ratio wa s equal to 1. It was also assumed that the PMFIL/PM10- FIL /PM25- FIL was equal to 1. Condensible ratios were calculated from uncontrolled FIRE emission factors for these SCCs. In some cases it was necessary to map the SCC to FIRE to find a match for condensible ratios.

• Ratios for SCCs not like 10* and 20* were obtai ned from the PM Calculator. It was assumed that the condensible component was zero.14 Table II-1. Description of the Field Nam es and Descriptions for the SCC Control

Device Ratios Table

Field Name Field Description

PM Calculator A “Yes” in this field indicates that at least some of the information was retrieved from the PM
Calculator

FIRE A “Yes” in this field indicates that at least so me of the information was retrieved from the Emission
Factors table. A “Condensible Ratios” in this field indicates that the condensible ratios factors were
retrieved from this table. Other A field to indicate other sources as necessary. SCC Source category code from the S/L agency-provided data. SCC_DESC Description of source category code from the S/L agency-provided data. maptoSCC This field equals SCC unless the SCC provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In that case, the SCC was mapped using the cl osest available appropr iate mapping choice. maptoSCC_DESC Description of the maptoSCC. mapSCCNote Any notes related to the mapping of the SCC. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the SCC was mapped. PD Primary device type from the S/L agency provided data. PD_DESC Description of the primary device (PD). maptoPD This field equals PD unless the PD provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In that case, the PD was mapped using the closes t available appropriate mapping choice. maptoPD_DESC Description of the maptoPD. mapPDNote Any notes related to the mapping of the PD. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the PD was mapped. SD Secondary device type from the S/L agency provided data. SD_DESC Description of the secondary device (SD). maptoSD This field equals SD unless the SD provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In that case, the SD was mapped using the closes t available appropriate mapping choice. maptoSD_DESC Description of the maptoSD. mapSDNote Any notes related to the mapping of the SD. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the SD was mapped. PM-FIL/PM10-FIL This field and the following are ratios calc ulated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM-FIL/PM25-FIL This field and the following are ratios calc ulated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM-FIL/PM-PRI This field and the following are ratios calcul ated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM-PRI/PM10-PRI This field and the following are ratios calc ulated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM-PRI/PM25-PRI This field and the following are ratios calc ulated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM10-FIL/PM25-FIL This field and the following are ratios calc ulated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator. PM10-PRI/PM25-PRI This field and the following are ratios calc ulated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the

PM calculator.

PM-CON/PM10-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios

were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.

PM-CON/PM10-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.

PM-CON/PM25-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.

PM-CON/PM25-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.

PM-CON/PM-FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero.

PM-CON/PM-PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios
were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. RPO Specific Note Indicates SCC and control dev ice combinations are in the RPO inventory. Additional Notes Any notes regar ding assumptions about ratios.15 3. Implementation of the QA Ratios

In order to calculate the additional PM polluta nts based on the SCC Control Device ratio table developed in the above step, a crosstab table was created from the EM table based on the following fields:

• State FIPS

• County FIPS

• Tribal Code

• EU ID

• Process ID

• Start Date

• End Date

• Emission Type

• SCC

• Primary Device Type

• Secondary Device Type

The primary and secondary device type fields were added based on information from the CE

table. If CE information was not availa ble these fields were defaulted to 000 (“UNCONTROLLED”). In the few cases where th ere was a conflict betwee n the control devices reported for the same process for PM pollutant s (e.g., a PM10-PRI is liste d as controlled, but PM-PRI did not have control information), the control device type was selected based on the controlled pollutant.

In addition to the fields list ed above, the crosstab included the PM emission amounts for the particular process and a field that indicated wh ether those emissions exis ted in the inventory.

These fields were as follows:

• PM_PRI

• PM_FIL

• PM10_PRI

• PM10_FIL

• PM25_PRI

• PM25_FIL

• PM_CON

• PM_PRI_EXISTS

• PM_FIL_EXISTS

• PM10_PRI_EXISTS

• PM10_FIL_EXISTS

• PM25_PRI_EXISTS

• PM25_FIL_EXISTS

• PM_CON_EXISTS16 The emission values were in the PM_PRI, PM_FIL, PM10_PRI, PM10_FIL, PM25_PRI, PM25_FIL, PM_CON fields. The _EXISTS field i ndicated whether the po llutant was provided by the S/L agency. A zero indicated that the po llutant was not provided; a number greater than zero (usually one) indicates that it was provided by the S/L agency.

Prior to the development of this crosstab, the EM table was fille d in as much as possible using basic assumptions. For example, if the S/L agen cy provided zero emissions for some but not all forms of PM for a particular pro cess, it was assumed that all forms of PM for that process were zero and they were filled in accordingly. Si nce that assumption was that for non 10* and 20* SCCs, the condensible value was zero – that would lead to PM10-FIL = PM10-PRI and PM25-

FIL = PM25-PRI and PM-FIL = PM-PRI. Given that assumption, values for these pollutants were also filled in. After this data insertion, a subset of the crosstab was created. This subset only contained processes that required additional augmentation. The SCC Control Device Type ratio table was based on only those SCC and cont rol device types that required augmentation.

The next step was to fill in the missing informa tion in this crosstab using the information found

in the SCC Control Device Ratio table.

In calculating PM complement pollutants, prio rity was given to calculating –PRI and –CON pollutants. FIL pollutants were onl y calculated if necessary to calcu late other pollutants or if it was a by-product of this calculation.

In augmenting the PM pollutants, the non 10* and 20* SCCs were augmented first, with order given to augmenting based on PM 10 where available, PM 2.5 where available, and then PM.

Augmenting the PM pollutants for the 10* and 20* SCCs is more complicated, but the basic approach was to augment based on PM 10 (FIL or PRI) where available, PM 2.5 (FIL or PRI) where available, and then PM (FIL or PRI) if PM 10 or PM 2.5 variations were not av ailable. Where both

PM 10 (FIL or PRI) and PM 2.5 (FIL or PRI) variations were bot h available, the calculation for PM-CON was generally driven from the PM 10 number and the complements as necessary were

back calculated. Where a PRI emission factor ra tio was required and was not available, the FIL

emission factor ratio was used.

After completing the calculations , the data was QA checked to ensure that the calculations resulted in consistent values for the PM comple ment. On a few occasions, the mix of ratio value and the pollutants and values provided by the S/ L agency resulted in negative values when FIL was back-calculated. In this case the negative FIL value was set to zero and the PRI value was readjusted. In a few cases the appropriate combin ation of ratios, SCC, and control efficiencies

were not available to calculat e the PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI valu es. In these cases, PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were set equal. The resultant PM table information wa s appended to the EM

table.

Note: The augmentation procedures resulted in some high condensible ratios that were calculated for some SCC control device type combinations. In most cases, these high

condensible ratios were the resu lt of the back calculation of PM-CON from PMxx-PRI records.17 Since the state had already pr ovided the PMxx-PRI records, these PM-CON values were not

added.

The data source code field was used to identify records that were added to the inventory to complete the set of PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions.

iii. ERP Coordinates

If an S/L agency did not provide corrections for ERP coordinates that map more than 5 km outside of the county boundary, or provide coordinates for ERP r ecords that did not have any coordinates in the S/L inventory, the followi ng procedures were applied to replace the

coordinates:

• Coordinates for other ERPs at the same f acility, if available, that map within the

county;

• Coordinates for the centroid of the zip code for a facility if a valid zip code was provided or could be obtained from th e agency if it is not valid; or

• County centroid coordinates.

The zip code was taken from the SI NIF 3.0 table. The zip code was compared to a reference table of valid zip codes to verify that it was an active zip code and existe d in the state and county reported in the inventory. If a valid zip code for a facility coul d not be identified, the centroid for the facility’s county was used as a last re sort. In some cases, the S/L agency provided

confirmation that the S/L coordinates were corr ect even if the analysis indicated that the coordinates were outside of the county. These coordinates were not changed. Additionally, all

coordinates were converted to la titude/longitude measurements.

iv. ERP Parameters

If valid ERP parameters were not provided by the S/L agency, the ERP augmentation procedures that EPA developed for the 2002 point source NE I were applied to the MANE-VU inventory (EPA, 2004b). It has been determ ined that the augmentation pr ocedures in this document regarding SCC-specific ERP types and temperatures may be difficult to resolve. When this situation occurs, preference was given to the S/ L agency -supplied ERP type and SCC. For example, the procedures do not account for cases where an EU has two processes with one

defined as a stack source and the other as a f ugitive source. Therefore, the S/L-supplied ERP type was used when this situation occurred. If the ERP type was null, and information was not available from the S/L agency, the stack height in formation was used as a guide. If stack height information was available, the ERP was treated as a stack, if stack height information was not available, the ERP was treated as a fugitive. An additional modification to the augmentation procedure was also implemented. Since in many cases null values were filled in with zeros by S/L local databases when comparing out-of-range velocities and flows (after it was determined

that the stack and diameter information was corre ct) – null and zero values were treated in the same manner to prevent inappropriate replacemen t of stack parameter values. Additionally, stack parameter values were rounded to 1 decimal place when comparing with range values (just18 for the purposes of comparison) to prevent re placement of S/L parameter values based on negligible decimal differences.

v. Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data

Control efficiencies that were 100% and rule effectiveness of 100% with non-zero emissions were diagnosed as potential errors and sent to the S/L agencies. Where possible these data were updated with S/L data corrections. Decimal control efficiencies were also diagnosed and sent to the S/L agencies. A decimal control efficiency wa s usually a sign that a control efficiency had not been entered as a percenta ge as is required by NIF 3.0. Where possible these data was updated with S/L data corrections.

c. QA Review of Final Inventory

Final QA checks were run on the revised point so urce inventory data set to ensure that all corrections provided by the S/L agencies were in corporated into the S/L inventories and that there were no remaining QA issues that could be addressed during the dura tion of the project. The EPA QA program was run on the inventory a nd the QA output was reviewed to verify that all QA issues that could be a ddressed were resolved. The QA output file was provided in an Access database along with Vers ion 3 of the inventory.

3. Version 3 Emissions Summary

Table II-2 presents a State-level summary of th e annual point source emissions in Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. Note that PM10-P RI and PM25-PRI emissions are included in the inventory for all SCCs for which S/ L agencies reported any form of PM, PM 10 , and/or PM 2.5 emissions. If an agency did not report PM 10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI but reported PM-PRI, PMFIL, PM-CON, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL, the PM augmentation procedures discussed in the TSD were applied to the form of PM emissions supplied by the agency to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM emissions. If an agen cy reported PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions but not PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, or PM-CON em issions, the agency's inventory was not augmented to calculate filterable or condensible emissions. Note that PM-CON is associated with only fuel combustion sources.19 Table II-2. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Point Source Emissions by State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO
x PM10-

FIL PM10-

PRI PM25-

FIL PM25-
PRI PM-CON SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 4,053 12,923 738 1,617 0 1,283 389 15,988 4,907

Delaware 9,766 196 16,345 2,466 4,217 1,919 3,666 1,750 73,744 4,755

District of
Columbia 248 4 780 91 161 54 132 68 963 69

Maine 17,005 845 19,939 4,535 7,289 2,567 5,787 2,753 23,711 5,319

Maryland 99,024 305 95,328 3,723 9,029 0 5,054 2,018 290,927 6,184

Massachusetts 21,262 1,463 47,086 2,776 5,852 997 4,161 2,984 101,049 8,263

New Hampshire 2,725 74 9,759 1,180 3,332 786 2,938 2,151 46,560 1,599

New Jersey 12,300 51,593 2,928 6,072 2,543 4,779 3 61,217 14,401

New York 66,427 1,861 118,978 1,808 10,392 1,965 7,080 210 294,729 11,456

Pennsylvania 121,524 1,388 297,379 18,044 40,587 6,038 20,116 5,065 995,175 37,323

Rhode Island 2,234 58 2,764 233 300 117 183 68 2,666 1,928

Vermont 1,078 787 130 304 97 267 2 905 1,097

MANE-VU 357,645 6,194 673,660 38,654 89,150 17,083 55,447 17,462 1,907,634 97,30020 B. State-Specific Methods

For each of the MANE-VU states and two local agen cies in Pennsylvania, this section identifies the temporal basis of the emissions included in Version 3 and discusses revisions incorporated into Version 3. In addition, this section also di scusses the origin of each S/L agency’s emissions included in Version 3. For each agency, a table is provided in Appendix A that lists the data source codes by SCC, emission type period, and pollu tant. In addition, an electronic folder is provided for each S/L agency containing the QA Summary Reports prepared during Version 1 and other files documenting revisions included in Versions 2 and 3.

1. Connecticut

Connecticut’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for the following revisions that Connec ticut provided for Version 2 and included in Version 3:

• Changed coordinates for AES Thames, Inc. in New London County to -72.3184, 41.4499 (FIPS code 09011, facili ty identifier 1544).

• Changed values for Hartford Steam (FIPS code 09003, facility identifier 3471), EU P0250, process 02 for summer daily values as follows: Changed actual throughput from 1934 E6FT3 to 1.934 E6FT3, CO summer daily em issions from 53.185 tons to 0.0532 tons,

NO

x summer daily emissions from 255.288 t ons to 0.1021 tons, and VOC summer daily

emissions from 1.2569 tons to 0.0027 tons.

Table II-3 shows the emission type periods for which Connecticut provided emissions.

Table II-3. Connecticut 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type

Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 27

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 27

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

Table A-1 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Connecticut provided the data for CO, NO

x , PM10-PRI, SO 2 , and VOC. Connecticut did not provide any data for NH 3 . Emissions for PM10-FIL, PM25- PRI, PM25-FIL, and PM-CON were calculated from the PM10-PRI emissions provide d by Connecticut using the PM augmentation procedures.21 2. Delaware

Delaware’s Version 3 point source inventory orig inates from Version 1 except for some updates

to ORIS Boiler IDs in the EU table that were incorporated into Version 2 and included in

Version 3. Table II-4 shows the emission type periods for which Delaware provided emissions.

Table II-4. Delaware 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

Table A-2 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Delaware provided the data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. Delaware also provided much of

the PM emissions data but in some cases the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the PM data provided by Delaware to calculate emissions for other forms of PM (e.g., to estimate PM10-PRI from PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI from PM 25-FIL, PM10-PRI and PM10-FIL from PM25- PRI and PM25-FIL).

3. District of Columbia

The District of Columbia’s Vers ion 3 point source i nventory originates fro m Version 1. Table II-5 shows the emission type period for which the District of Columbia provided emissions.

Table II-5. District of Colu mbia 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

Table A-3 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC.

The District of Columbia provided the data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. The District of Columbia provided at least one form of PM emissions and the PM a ugmentation procedures were applied to the emissions provided by the Dist rict of Columbia to calculate emissions for the

other forms of PM.22 4. Maine

Maine’s Version 3 point source inventory origin ates from Version 1. Table II-6 shows the emission type periods for whic h Maine provided emissions.

Table II-6. Maine 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

Table A-4 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Maine provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. Maine provided PM10-

FIL and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Maine provided to calculat e emissions for the other forms of PM.

5. Maryland

Maryland’s Version 3 point source inventory orig inates from Version 1 except for some updates

to ORIS Boiler IDs in the EU table that were incorporated into Version 2 and included in

Version 3. Table II-7 shows th e emission type periods for whic h Maryland provided emissions.

Table II-7. Maryland 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20040101 20041231 30

NONANNUAL 20020101 20021231 29

NONANNUAL 20020501 20020930 29

NONANNUAL 20040101 20041231 29

Table A-5 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Maryland provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , VOC, PM10-PRI, and PM-PRI. The PM augmentation procedures were applie d to the PM10-PRI emissions that Maryland provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. Maryland provided NH 3 emissions for its point sources except for one new facility (state and county FIPS code 24013, facility ID 0012, SCC 30500622, data source code P) for which it used NH 3 emissions for four EUs (preheater kiln/dry process) prepared by MANE-VU.23 6. Massachusetts

Massachusetts’ Version 3 point s ource inventory originates from Version 1 except for the some stack parameter revisions that Ma ssachusetts provided and were incorporated into Version 3. For Version 3, Massachusetts provi ded revisions to stack paramete rs in the ERP table for six

EUs at three facilities. The revisions are list ed in the Excel file named “MA Revisions to
MANEVU V3 Point EI_040706.xls”. Table II-8 s hows the emission type periods for which Massachusetts provided emissions.

Table II-8. Massachusetts 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20030101 20031231 30

Table A-6 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Massachusetts provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. Massachusetts provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Massachusetts provi ded to calculate emissions for

the other forms of PM.

7. New Hampshire

New Hampshire’s Version 3 point source in ventory originates from Version 1. Table II-9 shows the emission type periods fo r which New Hampshire provided emissions.

Table II-9. New Hampshire 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

Table A-7 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. New Hampshire provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. New Hampshire provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/ or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New Hampshire provided to

calculate emissions for th e other forms of PM.24 8. New Jersey

New Jersey’s Version 3 point sour ce inventory originates from Ve rsion 1. In addition to the QA checks discussed previously in this TSD, New Jersey’s original inventory submittal to EPA

contained several issues with SCCs. For Vers ion 1, per direction provi ded by New Jersey, SCCs that were less than 8 digits were changed to SCCs with 8 digits. Also, as approved by New Jersey, inactive SCC 39999901 was changed to active SCC 39999999. The invalid unit “GAL” was changed to the valid unit “E 6GAL” in the EP table.

Table II-10 shows the emission type periods for which New Jersey provided emissions.

Table II-10. New Jersey 2 002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

Table A-8 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. New Jersey provided the em issions data for CO, NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. New Jersey provided PMPRI, PM10-PRI, and/or PM25-PRI emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New Jersey provide d to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. New Jersey did not provide any data for NH 3

.

9. New York

New York’s Version 3 point source inventory orig inates from Version 1 except for the following revisions that New York provided and we re incorporated into Version 3.

For Version 3, New York provided an Access database named “MANEVU_NY2002_
Point_Corrected_093005.mdb” with revisions to r ecords in the EM table. New York also provided in this database 651 r ecords that were not included in Version 2 of MANE-VU's point source inventory, and, therefore, these records were added to Version 3 of MANE-VU's point source inventory. The new records added emissions for pollutants (not in Version 2) for EUs and processes that existed in Version 2 of MANE-VU's point source inventory.

The records in Version 2 that were revised and the records that were added to Version 3 are

listed in the Excel file named “NY Revi sions to MANE-VU V3 Point EI_040706.xls”. Table II-11 shows the emission type period for which New York provided emissions.25 Table II-11. New York 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

Table A-9 in Appendix A identifies the data sour ces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. New York provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. New York provided PM-PRI, PM10-PRI, and/or PM25-PRI emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New York pr ovided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. New York provided NH 3 emissions for its point sources except for four cement kilns for

which it used NH 3 emissions from a MANE-VU-sponsored inventory. The following identifies the facilities for which the MAEN-VU-sponsored NH 3 emissions inventory for cement kilns was

used.

FIPS Code Facility ID SCC Data Source 36001 4010300016 30500606 (2 kilns/dry process) P 36001 4012400001 30500706 (1 kiln/wet process) P 36111 3514800084 30500606 (1 kiln/dry process) P

10. Pennsylvania (State, Excluding Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties)

The Version 3 point source inventory for the stat e of Pennsylvania originates from Version 1. The following summary excludes Allegheny and Ph iladelphia Counties who provided their own point source inventories fo r Versions 1, 2, and 3.

Table II-12 shows the emission type periods for which Pennsylvania provided emissions. Table A-10 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventor y. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Pennsylvania provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. Pennsylvania provided PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Pennsylvani a provided to calculate emissions for the other

forms of PM.26 Table II-12. Pennsylvania 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20020104 30 ANNUAL 20020131 20020812 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020111 30 ANNUAL 20020131 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020120 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020228 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020123 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020424 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020130 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020831 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020131 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020930 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020212 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021030 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020215 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021130 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020221 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020228 30 ANNUAL 20020205 20021223 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020313 30 ANNUAL 20020213 20020913 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020329 30 ANNUAL 20020214 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020331 30 ANNUAL 20020216 20020331 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020412 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20020331 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020414 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20020430 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020422 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20020531 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020427 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021031 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020430 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021130 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020503 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020514 30 ANNUAL 20020311 20021213 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020517 30 ANNUAL 20020311 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020521 30 ANNUAL 20020314 20021209 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020531 30 ANNUAL 20020318 20021223 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020603 30 ANNUAL 20020320 20020915 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020614 30 ANNUAL 20020320 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020626 30 ANNUAL 20020328 20021120 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020628 30 ANNUAL 20020330 20021122 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020630 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020430 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020701 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020531 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020731 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020731 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020813 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020930 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020831 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020909 30 ANNUAL 20020409 20021205 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020415 20021117 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021031 30 ANNUAL 20020415 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021101 30 ANNUAL 20020421 20021024 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021112 30 ANNUAL 20020424 20021016 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021130 30 ANNUAL 20020428 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021213 30 ANNUAL 20020429 20020922 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021216 30 ANNUAL 20020429 20021031 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021217 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20020630 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021220 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20020930 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021013 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021230 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021031 30

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20020703 30 ANNUAL 20020506 20021202 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021203 30 ANNUAL 20020511 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021215 30 ANNUAL 20020515 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020519 20020727 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021227 30 ANNUAL 20020525 20021231 3027 Table II-12. (Continued)

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020102 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020602 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021229 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020831 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021230 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020930 30

ANNUAL 20020102 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20021019 30

ANNUAL 20020103 20021126 30 ANNUAL 20020603 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020103 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020606 20021127 30

ANNUAL 20020103 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020629 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020104 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20020731 30

ANNUAL 20020104 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20020930 30

ANNUAL 20020104 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020105 20021218 30 ANNUAL 20020708 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020105 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20020831 30

ANNUAL 20020106 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20020930 30

ANNUAL 20020107 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20021130 30

ANNUAL 20020108 20021221 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020108 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020802 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020110 20021204 30 ANNUAL 20020901 20020930 30

ANNUAL 20020111 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020901 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020113 20021006 30 ANNUAL 20020920 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020114 20021203 30 ANNUAL 20021001 20021030 30

ANNUAL 20020115 20020318 30 ANNUAL 20021001 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020115 20020323 30 ANNUAL 20021028 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020115 20020326 30 ANNUAL 20021101 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020115 20020830 30 ANNUAL 20021118 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020123 20020127 30 ANNUAL 20021201 20021231 30

ANNUAL 20020124 20021127 30

11. Pennsylvania (Allegheny County, FIPS code 42003)

The Version 3 point source inventory for A llegheny County, Pennsylvania originates from

Version 1. Table II-13 shows the emission type periods for which Allegheny County provided

emissions.

Table II-13. Pennsylvania - Allegheny County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type

Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 2928 Table A-11 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table al so shows the num ber of counties by SCC. Allegheny County provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. Allegheny County provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, and/or PM-CON emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were a pplied to the emissions that Allegheny County provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

12. Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County, FIPS code 42101)

The Version 3 point source inventory for Philade lphia County, Pennsylvania originates from

Version 1. Table II-14 shows th e emission type periods for whic h Philadelphia County provided

emissions.

Table II-14. Pennsylvania - Philadelphi a County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

Table A-12 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table al so shows the num ber of counties by SCC. Philadelphia County provide d the emissions data for CO, NH 3 , NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. Philadelphia County provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Philadel phia County provided to

calculate emissions for th e other forms of PM.

13. Rhode Island

Rhode Island requested that their Version 2 inventory be replaced with the CAP and NH 3 inventory in the final 2002 point source NEI th at EPA released during March 2006. Therefore, all of Rhode Island’s point source data in Vers ion 2 was replaced with the point source data provided in the final 2002 point source NEI. The following provides a summary of the QA

issues identified and addressed in Version 1. The Excel file named “R I Revisions to MANE-VU V3 Point EI_040706.xls” provides documentation a nd correction of each of these issues for

Version 3.

The Site table in the NEI did not include the ORIS IDs for all of the EGUs identified in the EGU crosswalk table. Therefore, the crosswalk table was used to add th e ORIS IDs to the Site table. Matching of boiler IDs to the EU table for one facil ity was maintained in the NEI, and, therefore,

included in Version 3 of MANE-V U’s inventory. However, ma tching of boiler IDs for other

facilities was not available in the crosswalk table.29 The data source codes that EPA used in the R hode Island’s point sour ce inventory for the NEI

were maintained in the MANE-VU invent ory. The following defines the codes:

Code Description

A Augmented PM data. CAMD Record only in 2002 Emission Tracking System (ETS)/CEM for

SO 2 , NO

x , and heat input values; other emissions estimated.

SCAMD1 Data were received fr om the state. The state’s NO

x and SO 2 emission values were replaced with the ETS values. 99_PMPRI Not defined – presumed to mean PM-PRI data originating from the

1999 NEI. SUM Primary PM emissions calculated as the sum of the filterable PM

and PM-CON emissions

DIFF PM-CON emissions calculated as the difference between the primary PM and filterable PM emissions

QA of PM emissions was also performed in accordance with the QAPP for the 2002 base year inventory for EM table records th at were revised or added for R hode Island and New York. As a result, it was identified that the emission t on value was not correctly calculated from the

emission unit numerator and emission numeric valu e fields in the NEI file, therefore, the

emission ton value was corrected for the MANE- VU inventory. In addition, the final NEI for

Rhode Island contained NH 3 emissions for several facilities but no SCCs were provided for the

NH 3 emissions; therefore, the NH 3 emissions were removed for the MANE-VU inventory as requested by Rhode Island.

For Version 3 of MANE-VU's inventory, F acility ID EGU1036 and Facility Name

MANCHESTER STREET in the final 2002 NEI was ch anged to Facility ID AIR936 and Facility Name USGEN NEW ENGLAND INC per Rhode Isla nd’s request because this is the same facility (with ORIS ID 3236). Also, for State Facility ID AI R594, EU ID 2, ERP 2, and Process ID 2, the SCC was changed from 39000589 to 39000599. In addition, the ORIS IDs reported in

the NEI were revised to make them consistent with the crosswalk prepared for MANE-VU that matches state facility IDs to ORIS IDs.

One issue was identified with one record for Rhode Island where the su m of the PM10-FIL and PM-CON emissions was more than the PM10-PRI emissions, and the sum of the PM25-FIL and

PM-CON emissions was more than the PM25-PRI emissions for facility ID AIR1248 in County FIPS 44007; SCC 10300601 (External Combustion Boile rs : Commercial/Ins titutional : Natural Gas : > 100 Million Btu/hr). In addition, the PM10-FIL emissions reported was 1.6 tons more than the PM10-PRI emissions reported, and the PM25-FIL emissions reported was 1.6 tons more than the PM25-PRI emissions reported for this facility. The record has very low emissions and it was not clear how the PM consistency issues shoul d be addressed; therefore, due to time and resource constraints, this issue was not corrected in Version 3.

Table II-15 shows the emission type periods fo r which Rhode Island provided emissions.30 Table II-15. Rhode Island 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 30

Table A-13 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table al so shows the num ber of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC a nd emission type period combinati ons are listed more than once

because the data source codes are different fo r more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Rhode Island provided the emissions data for CO, NO

x , SO 2 , VOC, and PM-PRI. The EPA applied PM augmentation procedures to the PM-PRI emissions that Rhode Island provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. The EPA added NH 3 emissions for an EGU from EPA’s CAMD data; otherwise, NH 3 emissions are not available for other point

sources in Rhode Island.

14. Vermont

Vermont’s Version 3 point source inventory origin ates from Version 1. Table II-16 shows the emission type periods for which Vermont provided emissions.

Table II-16. Vermont 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission Type

Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

NONANNUAL 20020101 20020331 27

NONANNUAL 20020101 20021231 29

NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 27

Table A-14 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory. This table al so shows the num ber of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC a nd emission type period combinati ons are listed more than once

because the data source codes are different fo r more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Vermont provided the emissions data for CO, NO

x , SO 2 , and VOC. Vermont provided PM-FIL, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Vermont provided to calculate emissions for the

other forms of PM. Vermont’s inventory does not include NH 3 emissions.

C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?

This section provides a summary of potential revisions to incorporat e into future versions of the MANE-VU point sour ce inventory.31 All States – A coordinated effort between th e S/L agencies should be developed to apply

consistent methods to avoid havi ng to apply procedures to augmen t inventory data to correct for the QA issues and fill in missing data as discussed previously in this chapter. For example, this will ensure that consistent methods are applied across S/L agencies to ensure accurate reporting of stack parameters, PM emissions, and minimize other QA issues that we re identified during the development of Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the inventory.

For PM emissions, the S/L agencies should deve lop and apply a consistent method for including

condensible emissions for fuel combustion sour ces that can be applied when the agencies develop their inventories. This may include co mpiling the emission factors for all forms of PM into one database, organized by SCC and control t ype (for filterable emissions), and sharing the database among the MANE-VU S/L agencies. Use of a consistent set of emission factors will help to avoid the PM consistency issues iden tified in Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the MANE-VU inventory as well as ensure that condensible emissions are included in the primary emissions reported in the inventory.

The EGU crosswalk should be maintained to en sure that State Facil ity IDs and EU IDs are correctly matched with ORIS IDs and boiler IDs.

State-specific suggestions are as follows:

Connecticut, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont – Include NH 3 emissions.

New Jersey – Develop a method to translate the SCCs that are less than 8 digits reported by facilities to 8 digit SCCs fo r reporting in the inventory.32 CHAPTER III

– AREA SOURCES

A. General Methods for all States

1. What Data Sources Were Used?

Version 1 of the 2002 MANE-VU area source inve ntory was built on the inventories that the State agencies submitted to EPA from May through July of 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. Except for Rhode Island, all of the MANE-VU St ates also submitted area source inventories to

EPA. Rhode Island elected to use the preliminary 2002 NEI for its area source inventory. The EPA performed some limited QA review of the St ate inventories to iden tify format, referential integrity, and duplicate record issues. The EPA re vised the inventories to address these issues

and made the files available to the State agencies on August 6, 2004. These inventory files were used as the starting point for the MANE-VU i nventory. These inventory files were obtained from EPA, consolidated into a single data set, subjected to extensive QA review, and revised (as approved by the MANE-VU State agencies) to ad dress QA issues and fill data gaps identified while preparing Version 1. Subse quently, the following agencies pr ovided revisions to their area

source inventories:

• Version 2 – District of Columbia, Massachus etts, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont.

• Version 3 – Massachusetts, Maine, Ne w Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island.

The Version 2 and 3 revisions for these States are discussed in secti on III.B (State-Specific Methods) of this chapter. In addition, as requested by MANE-VU, revisions were made to Version 3 to (1) add emissions for portable fuel containers (PFCs), industrial adhesives, and

outdoor residential wood combustion fo r some States; (2) decrease the PM 2.5 emissions for paved and unpaved roads and construction for all States ; and (3) remove invalid CE records that originated from the preliminary 2002 NEI for some States. These revisions are explained in section III.A.3 of this chapter.33 To track the origin of data, the temporal peri od of emissions, and to facilitate generation of emission summaries, the following NI F plus fields were added to the EP, PE, EM, and CE tables:

• Data Source Codes:

For the area source inventory data, the data sour ce codes are based on the following 9-character

format:

[Data Origin]-[Year]-[Grown/Not Grown/Ca rried Forward]-[PM Augmentation Code]

Code Field Length
Data Origin 1
Year 3 (including leading hyphen)

Grown/Not Grown/Carried Forward 2 (including leading hyphen) PM Augmentation 3 (including leading hyphen)

Data Origin Codes

Code Description S State agency-supplied data L Local agency-supplied data R Tribal agency-supplied data P Regional Planning Organization

E EPA/Emission Factors and Invent ory Group (EFIG)-generated data

Year Codes

Year for which data are supplied (e.g., Year = -02 for 2002), or from which prior year data are taken (e.g., Year = -99 for 1999; -01=2001).

Grown/Carried Forward/Not Grown Codes

Code Description -G Used when emissions in a pre-2002 inventory are grown to represent 2002

emissions. -F Used when emissions in a pre-2002 i nventory are carried forward and included in the 2002 inventory without adjustment for growth. -X Used when the emissions are not grown or are not carried forward. For example, X is used when emissions ar e calculated for the 2002 inventory using 2002 activity, or when data are repl aced with 2002 State data.34 PM Augmentation Codes

-PA PM Augmented Emissions: Record for PM 10 /PM 2.5 emissions that were updated or added using ad-hoc updates. -PC PM Augmented Emissions: Record added for PM 10 /PM 2.5 emissions estimated using the PM Calculator. -PR PM Augmented Emissions: Record added for PM 10 /PM 2.5 emissions estimated using ratios of PM 10 -to-PM or PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 . If PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions are equal and one of the pollu tants is assigned this code , the ratio is assumed to

be 1.

• Revision Date: This field indicates the mont h and year during which the last revision was

made to a record.

• State FIPS: This field indicates the State FIPS code of the submittal.

• County FIPS: This field indicates th e county FIPS code of the inventory.

The following NIF plus fields we re added to the EM table:

• Emission Ton Value: This field indicates the values of the em issions in tons. This field was used to prepare summaries of emi ssions on a consistent EU basis.

• Emission Type Period: This field indicates the period of the Emission Type – either ANNUAL, SEASONAL, MONTHLY, or DAILY. Emission table records designated as ANNUAL were used to prepare su mmaries of annual emissions.

• CAP_HAP: This field identifies records fo r CAP versus records for HAPs. For the MANE-VU inventory, the flag is CAP for all records.

• Year: This field indicates the year of the data; for this inventory, it is 2002.

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?

A QAPP was prepared and approved by MANE- VU/MARAMA and the EP A Regional Office prior to initiating work on Version 1 of the inventory (M ANE-VU, 2004a). This QAPP was followed during preparation of a ll three versions of the invent ory. This section provides an overview of the QA checks completed on each ve rsion of the inventory. The QA process for each State inventory involved the following step s that are also included in the following

discussion:

• Conduct QA checks on each State inventory;

• Prepare a QA Summary Report for subm ittal to the agency for review;

• Revise the inventory to resolve QA issues as directed by the agency;

• Repeat the QA checks on the revised inventor y to verify that the corrections were completed;35 • Perform augmentation to co rrect for missing data; and

• Repeat the QA checks to verify that th e augmentation was completed correctly.

a. QA checks for State emission inventories

The following QA checks were run on each State inventory:

i. County and SCC coverage

ii. Pollutant coverage

iii. EPA QA summaries sent to State agencies

iv. Range errors

v. PM emissions consistency and completeness review

vi. Control device type and contro l efficiency data review

vii. Start and end date checks

viii. Annual and daily emissions comparison County and SCC Coverage

The county coverage in the State inventories appeared to be reas onable for all States. The SCC coverage was difficult to evaluate simply by show ing a count of the number of SCCs by State. Each State inventory was compared to the pre liminary 2002 NEI, and area source categories in

the NEI but not in a State inventor y were sent to each agency for re view. Each State agency then selected the NEI categories that were th en added to the MANE-VU inventory.

Pollutant Coverage

The pollutant coverage in the State inventorie s was complete for all pollutants except for PM 10 and PM 2.5 . Diagnosis and resolution of PM 10 and PM 2.5 pollutant emissions is discussed later in section III.A.2.c. The exception was Connecticut who included only VOC, NO

x , and CO emissions in its inventory submittal to EPA.

EPA QA Summaries Sent to State Agencies

Under a separate project with EPA, Pechan performed QA review of the State area source inventories. This QA review involved running EPA’s QA program on each data set to identify and resolve QA issues. Using the results of th is QA work, Pechan prep ared two sets of QA summaries that EPA sent to the State agencies. Pechan contacted each State agency with QA issues identified in the EPA reports to obtain di rection for correcting the QA issues identified in the reports. The following explains these two summaries:36 High-level Summary of State I nventories Submitted to EPA:

The first summary was an Excel workbook file w ith four spreadsheets that provided the following information:

• 2002 Nonpoint File Names: This spreadshee t documented names and formats of the files that EPA received from the State agencies and the dates on which they were

transferred to Pechan.

• 2002 Nonpoint Summary: This spreadsheet documented the name of the state agency, type of inventory (i.e., CAP, HAP, or both), a comparison of the number of the counties in the inventory to the total number of countie s in the State to identify the geographic coverage of the inventory, a unique list of CAP codes, and the total number of area source SCCs. This spread sheet also indicated if any nonroad or onroad emissions data were moved from the agency’s area source inventory to its nonroad or onroad inventory.

• 2002 Nonpoint Emission Sums: This spr eadsheet summarized emissions by start date, end date, and emission type and assi gned the appropriate code to the emission type period NIF plus field.

• 2002 Nonpoint Error Summary: This sp readsheet provided a copy of the “SummaryStats” table from the EPA QA program (EPA, 2004a). This table provided the count of records for each NI F 3.0 table and identif ied the number of records with errors by type of error.

Detailed Summary of QA Issues:

This summary (sent to State agencies on August 11) was prepared in a text file that listed by

State and NIF table the number of records with er rors, and provided corrections for the errors. To support documentation of corrections to some of the errors in the text file, Pechan prepared

an Excel workbook file that summarized the follo wing errors and corrections by State: invalid pollutants codes; invalid units; invalid maximu m achievable control technology (MACT) codes;

and invalid and inactive SCCs. A spreadsheet was also included to show the mapping of

standard industrial classificati on (SIC) codes to North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes. This crosswalk was used to co rrect invalid NAICS code s if a valid SIC code

was available in the State inventories and vice versa.37 Additional QA for the MANE- VU Area Source Inventory

The following explains additional QA and data tracking that was perf ormed for the MANE-VU inventory. The following data elements were reviewed to identify QA issues:

• Range Errors;

• PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness;

• Control Device Codes and Control Efficiency Values;

• Start and End Dates;

• Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison; and

• Comparison of State Inventorie s to the 2002 Preliminary NEI.

For each State inventory for which QA issues we re identified, a separa te QA Summary Report was prepared in an Excel workbook file, and sent to each State agency for review. The State agencies provided directions in the Excel Wo rkbook file, via e-mail, or by submitting revised

records in NIF 3.0 in an Access database to correct the inventories. The QA reports are

discussed under section III.A.2.b.

Range Errors

The EPA’s QA program contains ro utines that compare annual em ission values, numeric fields in the PE and EP tables, and ot her temporal numeric fields agai nst a range of values. The QA program flags records that are less than or greate r than the range of valu es for review. Pechan summarized the range errors for the State agencies to review and provide corrections. According to EPA, the ranges to which values in inventor ies are compared represent “normal” ranges that are based on percentiles from prev ious inventories. The range va lues are conservative in that EPA wants to identify suspicious values even though the values may be real (Thompson, 2002).

PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness Review

The following consistency checks were performed at the EM table data key level (for annual emissions) to compare PM emissions:

• If an SCC was associated with a PM emi ssion record, but was missing one or more of the following (as appropriate for the SCC [i.e., PM-CON is associated with fuel combustion only]): PM10-FIL, PM10-PRI, PM25-FIL, PM25-PRI, or PM-CON, the record was flagged for review.

• The following equations were used to determine consistency:

PM10-FIL + PM-CON = PM10-PRI

PM25-FIL + PM-CON = PM25-PRI38 • The following comparisons were made to determine consistency:

PM10-PRI >= PM10-FIL

PM25-PRI >= PM25-FIL

PM10-PRI >= PM-CON

PM25-PRI >= PM-CON

PM10-FIL >= PM25-FIL

PM10-PRI >= PM25-PRI

If the data failed one of these checks it was diagnosed as an erro r. If a State agency did not provide corrections to these errors, the errors were corrected/filled in according to an augmentation procedure explaine d in section III.A.2.c.

For information purposes, all PM-PRI and PM-FIL records were flagged to indicate that these pollutants were included instead of, or in addition to, the standard PM10-PRI/FIL, PM25- PRI/FIL, and PM-CON pollutants.

Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data Review

The CE codes in the “Primary Device Type C ode” and “Secondary Device Type Code” fields were reviewed to identify invalid codes (i.e., co des that did not exist in the NIF 3.0 reference table) and missing codes (e.g., records with a nu ll or uncontrolled code of 000 but with control efficiency data).

QA review of control efficiency data involved dia gnosis of two types of errors. First, records were reviewed to identify control efficiency values that were reported as a decimal rather than as a percent value. Records with control efficien cies with decimal values were flagged as a potential error (although not necessarily an error, since the real control efficiency may be less than 1%). Records with a 1% control efficiency value were also identified for review by the State agency to determine if the value was reported as a decimal in its internal data system but

rounded to 1% when the data were converted to NIF 3.0.

The second check identified reco rds where 100% control was reporte d in the CE table, but the emissions in the EM table were greater than zero and the rule effectiveness value in the EM table was null, zero, or 100% (implying 100% control of emissions). Because many agencies did not populate the rule effectiveness field or a default value of zero was assigned, records with null or

zero rule effectiveness values were included wh ere the CE was 100% and emissions were greater

than zero. For records that met these criteria , Pechan consulted with the State agency to

determine if corrections were n eeded to any of the fields.

Start and End Date Checks

QA review was conducted to identify start and end date values in the PE and EM tables to confirm consistency with the inventory year in th e TR table, and to confirm that the end date reported was greater than the start date reported.39 Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison

The State inventories were revi ewed to determine if any of the following conditions existed:

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level as emission type 30, but with different start

and end dates. While not a tr ue duplicate, this may indicate an error or inclusion of

both annual and seasonal values.

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level as a daily emission type (27, 29, etc.) but

with different start and end dates. While not a true dup licate, this may indicate an error or just inclusion of addi tional types of daily emissions.

• Multiple records coded at the SCC level with the same start and end date, but different emission types. Wh ile not a true duplicate, this may indicate an error or just inclusion of additional types of daily emissions.

• Any “DAILY” type record that was missing its associated “ANNUAL” record was flagged for review.

• Any “DAILY” type record that was greater than its associated “ANNUAL” record was flagged for review.

b. Responses from State Agencies

QA Summary Reports were sent to the State agencies to review the QA issues identified. The State agencies were asked to return these reports to MANE-VU with their corrections documented in the reports. These reports were then used to document revisions to the State inventories. The QA Su mmary Reports containing the revisions provided by the State agencies are provided in Excel Workbook files with this TSD.

c. Gap Filling and Augmentation

This section explains the methods used to add data for categories and/or pollutants missing in a State’s inventory after revising th e inventory to address QA issues.

i. MANE-VU sponsored inventories

ii. PM augmentation

iii. Fossil fuel combustion sources

iv. Other sources of PM emissions

v. Merging of NEI data into S/L inventories

vi. Revisions to the preliminary 2002 NEI incorporated into Version 1 of the MANE-VU inventory

vii. Additional work on Area source methods - Fugitive Dust Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads - Wildfires and Prescribed Burning40 The following discusses the augmentation procedures that were applied to the State inventories to improve the inventories or to fill in missi ng data not supplied by the State agencies.

MANE-VU -Sponsored Inventories

MANE-VU sponsored inventory development for residential wood combustion, open burning, public owned treatment works (POTWs), compos iting, and industrial refrigeration. At the beginning of the project for developing Version 1, each State agency was requested to indicate if it (1) included the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory for one or more of these categories in the inventory it submitted to EPA; (2) included its ow n estimates for a category in the inventory it submitted to EPA; or (3) if it did not include a category in its inventory, if the MANE-VUsponsored inventory or the 2002 preliminary NEI s hould be used as the source of data for the category. The results of this Version 1 invent ory development request are summarized in Table

III-1.

Improvements to fugitive dust emissions for the paved and unpaved road categories were completed after the draft version of the cons olidated area source inventory was prepared. Agencies provided guidance on if they wanted the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory for these two categories to replace the pave d and unpaved road inventorie s they had included in their inventories. For paved roads, all States requ ested that the MANE-VU- sponsored inventory be used; however, New Jersey and Ma ryland requested that the winter -time sand/silt adjustment not be included in their inventories. For unpaved ro ads, nine of the 12 States requested that the MANE-VU-sponsored inventory be used. New Jers ey requested that its unpaved road inventory be used instead of the MANE-VU-sponsored inve ntory. In addition, the District of Columbia and Delaware do not have any unpaved road acti vity and excluded this category from their

inventories.

PM Augmentation

Procedures were developed to estimate missing pollutant data fr om data provided by the State agencies in order to develop a complete set of PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions to support air quality modeling. The following discusses the pro cedures for fossil fuel combustion sources first followed by the procedures for all other area sources of PM emissions.

Fossil Fuel Combustion Sources

Fossil fuel combustion sources include industria l, commercial/institutional, and residential anthracite coal, bituminous/subbituminous coal, dist illate oil and kerosene, residual oil, natural gas, and LPG. All of these sources emit bot h filterable and condensible emissions. The QA

review of the PM emissions data for these so urces focused on verifying that the emissions reported in the State inventor ies included both filterable a nd condensible emissions. The emissions for these pollutants can be reported in St ate inventories individually (i.e., as filterable and condensible separately) or as primary em issions (i.e., the sum of the filterable and condensible emissions). The QA review also fo cused on evaluating the emission factors reported

in the State inventories to determ ine if they were reasonable.41Table III-1. Summary of MANE-VU-Sponsored Inventories Included in Version 1 of the AreaSource Consolidated Emissions InventoryMANE-VU Inventory Included inState’s Inventory Submitted toEPANot Included in State’sInventory - Add to MANE-VUInventoryState’s Inventory Includes StateDeveloped EstimatesNot Included in State’sInventory - Add 2002Preliminary NEI Data toState’s InventoryArea SourceCategory Pollutant SCCsAnnualSummerDayWinterDay AnnualSummerDayWinterDay AnnualSummerDayWinterDay AnnualPOTWsNH3,VOC 2630020010(WastewaterTreatment)DE, NJ, PA DE, NJ, PAVT VTCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NH,NJ, NYCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NH,NJNJ ME, RI2630020020(BiosolidsProcesses)DE, NJ, PA DE, NJ, PAVT VTCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NH,NJ, NYCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NH,NJNJ ME, RI2630050000(Digested Sludge)DE, NH,NJ, PADE, NH, NJ,PAVT VTCT, DC, DE,MA, MD, NYCT, DC, DE,MA, MDME, RICompostingNH3,VOC 2680001000(Biosolids)NH, NJ NH, NJCT, DC,MA, ME,PA, VTCT, DC, MA,ME, PA, VT2680002000(Mixed Biosolids andGreen Waste)NH, NJ NH, NJCT, DC,MA, ME,PA, VTCT, DC, MA,ME, PA, VT2680003000(Composting; GreenWaste)DC, MA,MEDC, MA, MEIndustrialRefrigerationNH32399010000 ME, NH,NJME, NH, NJCT, MA,PA, VTCT, MA, PA,VT2104008000(Indoor)MA, MD,NHMA, MD,NHMA, MD,NHCT, DE,MECT, DE, ME CT, DE,MENJ, NY, VT NJ NJ DC, PA, RIResidentialWoodCombustionAll criteriapollutants/precursors, andmany toxic airpollutants2104008070(Outdoor)MA, MD,NHMA, MD,NHMA, MD,NHCT, DE,MECT, DE, ME CT, DE,ME2610000100(Leaves)MA, MD,NH, PADC, DE,NY, VTNJ NJ NJ ME, RI2610000400(Brush)MA, MD,PACT, DC,DE, NY, VTNJ NJ NJ ME, NH, RI2610030000(Municipal SolidWaste)MA, MD,PADC, DE,NYNH, NJ NH, NJ NJ ME, RI, VTOpen BurningAll criteriapollutants/precursors, andmany toxic airpollutants2610040400(Municipal YardWaste)MA, NY,PADC, NY,VTDE, NJ DE, NJ DE, NJTable III-1 (continued)42Notes:Gray shading identifies categories for which daily emissions are not available.POTWs:CT, MD: Provided VOC but not NH3emissions in its State inventory.DC, MA, MD, ME, NH, RI: Reported POTW emissions under SCC 2630020000 (Total Processed).DE: MANE-VU inventory used for NH3; DE provided its own VOC emissionsunder SCC 2630020000 (Total Processed).NJ: MANE-VU-sponsored inventory used for NH3only. NJ included its own inventory for the other criteria pollutants under SCCs 2630010000 and 2630020000.NY: Reported VOC emissions under SCC 2630000000 (from the preliminary 2002 NEI) and SCC 2630020000 (State-developed inventory).MANE-VU-sponsored NH3inventory was not used.Composting:CT, NH: SCC 2680003000 is not in the MANE-VU-sponsored composting inventory for these States.DE: This State does nothave composting activity.MD: State requested that the MANE-VU inventory for this category not be included in its inventory.NY, RI: Did not include emissions for this category in the 2002 inventory.Industrial Refrigeration:DC: Requested that the preliminary 2002 NEI be used but theNEI does not contain any emissions for this category in DC.DE: State-developed emissions are included in point source inventory.MD, RI: Did not include emissions for this category in its inventory.ME: Used the MANE-VU inventory emissions under SCC 2302080002 (Miscellaneous Foodand Kindred Products/Refrigeration).NH: Original inventorysubmittal to EPA includes SO2and PM emissions for SCC 2399000000 from the preliminary 2002 NEI; NH3emissions for SCC 2399010000 are from the MANE-VU inventory.NY: Original inventorysubmittal to EPA includes SO2and PM emissions for SCC 2399000000 from the preliminary 2002 NEI; NY did not use the MANE-VU-sponsored NH3inventory for SCC2399010000.Residential Wood Combustion:DC: RWC inventory in 2002 NEI covers seven SCCs and does not include daily emissions.Open Burning:CT: Statewide activity for SCC 2610000100 (Leaves) and SCC 2610030000 (Municipal Solid Waste) is negligible.For SCCs 2610000400 (Brush) and 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste), State initially provided VOC, NOx, and CO emissions under SCC 2610000000 which is no longer a valid SCC in EPA’smaster SCC list. CT recalculated emissions to include VOC, NOx, CO, PM10-PRI/-FIL, and PM25-PRI/-FIL, and placed the emissions on valid SCC 2610000500 (Land Clearing Debris)since the majority of the activity is associated with activities covered by this SCC.MD: The MANE-VU inventory for SCC 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste)reports zero emissions indicating that the activity for thecategory does not occur in MD. MD did not include the SCC in itsinventory for this reason.NH: Did not include NH3emissions in MANE-VU inventory forSCC 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste).43 To support the QA review effort, the uncontrolle d PM emission factors shown in Table III-2 were compiled from AP-42. The emission fact ors reported in the St ate inventories were compared to the emission factors in this table. Emission factors that appeared too high or too low were flagged for review by the State agency. In addition, inventory data were flagged for review by the State agency if the emissions were reported under the primary PM pollutant codes

but the emission factors matched with the emissi on factors for filterable PM in Table III-2. Finally, if emission factors were not reported in the State agency inventory, the emission factors were back-calculated using the throughput data (if available), emissions, rule effectiveness values, and control efficiency data (if availabl e). The back-calculated emission factors were compared to the factors in Table III-2 to identify data with major difference between the factors. It is emphasized that the uncontro lled emission factors in Table III-2 were used as a reference for reviewing State inventory data. The emission factor s in this table should not be construed to be

the best available for all State agencies since the emission fact ors will vary depending on the composition of the boiler population in an agency’s area source inventory.

Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryla nd, New Hampshire, New Jerse y, New York, and Pennsylvania provided their own inventory for al l fossil fuel combustion categorie s. Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont us ed fossil fuel combustion inventory data in the preliminary 2002 NEI for some or all of the ca tegories. The following provides details on the origin of the fossil fuel combustion inventories for these States:

Connecticut supplied VOC, NO

x , and CO emissions from its 1999 inventory for industrial and commercial/institutional fossil fuel combustion. PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO 2 , and

NH 3 emissions were taken from preliminar y NEI estimates (carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI). For the residentia l sector, Connecticut’s inventory was taken from the preliminary 2002 NEI. Connectic ut provided guidance on the counties with natural gas and LPG activity for which to use the NEI estimates.

For the District of Columbia, the preliminary NEI was used to gap fill missing PM10-PRI

and PM25-PRI emissions for commercial/inst itutional bituminous/ subbituminous coal combustion and PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, SO 2 , and NH 3 for commercial/institutional natural gas combustion. The NEI estimates for these commercial/institutional categories were

carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. The District of Columbia used the NEI

estimates for residential bituminous/subbituminous coal combustion.

Maine and Rhode Island used the preliminar y 2002 NEI for all three sectors. The NEI

estimates for the industrial and commercial/instit utional sectors were carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI, while the reside ntial sector estimate s are based on 2000 or 2002 activity estimates pr epared by EPA.

Vermont used the preliminary 2002 NEI for th e industrial and comme rcial/ institutional

sectors and residential anthrac ite coal (carried forward fr om Version 3 of the 1999 NEI), but provided its own inventory for residentia l distillate oil, natural gas, and LPG.44Table III-2. Area Source Industrial, Commercial/Institutional, and Residential Fossil Fuel CombustionUncontrolled Emission Factors for PM10-PRI/FIL, PM25-PRI/FIL, and PM-CONPollutant1UncontrolledEmission Factor(EF) EF Numerator EF DenominatorCalculatedUncontrolled EF ReferenceIndustrial Boilers: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2102001000)PM10-FIL 2.3 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 30.77 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula of 2.3 * % Ash Content(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002.PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 8.03 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content(13.38%) (used Commercial/Institutionalemission factors). Reference for ashcontent is EPA, 2002.PM-CON 0.08 x % Ashcontent of coalLB TON 1.07 AP-42 Table 1.2-3 Used formulafor SCC 10300101, EF calculated fromformula of .08 * % Ash Content (13.38%).Reference for ash content is EPA,2002.PM10-PRI LB TON 31.84PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10Industrial Boilers: Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal (SCC 2102002000)PM10-FIL 13.2 LB TON 13.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EF (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors)PM25-FIL 4.6 LB TON 4.6 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EF (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors)PM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors)PM10-PRI LB TON 14.24PM25-PRI LB TON 5.64Industrial Boilers and IC Engines: Distillate Oil (SCC 2102004000)PM10-FIL 1 LB E3GAL 1 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM25-FIL 0.25 LB E3GAL 0.25 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.30PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.55Industrial Boilers: Residual Oil (SCC 2102005000)PM10-FIL 7.17 x % Sulfurcontent of oilLB E3GAL 10.683 AP-42 Table 1.3-5. EF calculated from formula of 7.17(A); whereA=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios.PM25-FIL 4.67 x % Sulfurcontent of oilLB E3GAL 6.958 AP-42 Table 1.3-5. EF calculated from formula of 7.17(A); whereA=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios.PM-CON 1.5 LB E3GAL 1.5 AP-42 Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 12.18PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 8.46Industrial Boilers and IC Engines: Natural Gas (SCC 2102006000)PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM10-PRI 7.6 LB E6FT3 7.60PM25-PRI 7.6 LB E6FT3 7.60Table III-2 (continued)45Pollutant1UncontrolledEmission Factor(EF) EF Numerator EF DenominatorCalculatedUncontrolled EF ReferenceIndustrial Boilers - Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2102007000)PM10-FIL 0.6 LB E3GAL 0.6 AP-42 Table 1.5-1PM25-FIL 0.6 LB E3GAL 0.6 AP-42 Table 1.5-1PM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CON emission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (for allPM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emissionfactor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to lb/1,000 gallons of propane.Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion factor assumes 1020 Btu/scf fornatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP-42,Appendix A, page A-5).PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 1.11PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.11Industrial Boilers: Kerosene (SCC 2102011000)PM10-FIL 1 LB E3GAL 1 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM25-FIL 0.25 LB E3GAL 0.25 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-6PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.30PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 1.55Commercial/Institutional Heating:Anthracite Coal (SCC 2103001000)PM10-FIL 2.3 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 30.77 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula of 2.3 * % Ash Content(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002.PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 8.03 AP-42 Table 1.2-4 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content(13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002.PM-CON 0.08 x % Ashcontent of coalLB TON 1.07 AP-42 Table 1.2-3 Used formulafor SCC 10300101, EF calculated fromformula of 0.08 * % Ash Content (13.38%).Reference for ash content is EPA,2002.PM10-PRI LB TON 31.84PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10Commercial/Institutional Heating:Bituminous and Lignite (SCC 2103002000)PM10-FIL 13.2 LB TON 13.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EFPM25-FIL 4.6 LB TON 4.6 AP-42 Table 1.1-9 EFPM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (0.04 lb/MMBtu * 26MMBtu/ton=1.04)PM10-PRI LB TON 14.24PM25-PRI LB TON 5.64Commercial/Institutional Heating: Distillate Oil (SCC 2103004000)PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13Table III-2 (continued)46Pollutant1UncontrolledEmission Factor(EF) EF Numerator EF DenominatorCalculatedUncontrolled EF ReferenceCommercial/Institutional Heating: Residual Oil (SCC 2103005000)PM10-FIL 5.17 x % Sulfurcontent of oilLB E3GAL 7.703 AP-42 Table 1.3-7. EF calculated from formula of 5.17(A); whereA=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios.PM25-FIL 1.92 x % Sulfurcontent of oilLB E3GAL 2.861 AP-42 Table 1.3-7. EF calculated from formula of 5.17(A); whereA=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios.PM-CON 1.5 LB E3GAL 1.5 AP-42, Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 9.20PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 4.36Commercial/Institutional Heating: Natural Gas (SCC 2103006000)PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4-2PM10-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60PM25-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60Commercial/Institutional Heating:Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2103007000)PM10-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Propane for Commercial Boilers)PM25-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Propane for Commercial Boilers)PM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CON emission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (for allPM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emissionfactor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to lb/1,000 gallons of propane.Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion factor assumes 1020 Btu/scf fornatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP-42,Appendix A, page A-5).PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91Commercial/Institutional Heating: Kerosene (SCC 2103011000)PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13Residential Heating: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2104001000)PM10-FIL 10 LB TON 10 EPA, 2002.PM25-FIL 0.6 x % Ash contentof coalLB TON 8.03 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference forEF and ash content is EPA, 2002.PM-CON 0.08 x % Ashcontent of coalLB TON 1.07 EF calculated from formula of 0.08 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference forEF and ash content is EPA, 2002.PM10-PRI LB TON 11.07PM25-PRI LB TON 9.10Table III-2 (continued)47Pollutant1UncontrolledEmission Factor(EF) EF Numerator EF DenominatorCalculatedUncontrolled EF ReferenceResidential Heating: Bituminousand Lignite Coal (SCC 2104002000)PM10-FIL 6.2 LB TON 6.2 AP-42 Table 1.1-11PM25-FIL 3.8 LB TON 3.8 AP-42 Table 1.1-11PM-CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP-42 Table 1.1-5 (0.04 lb/MMBtu * 26 MMBtu/ton=1.04)PM10-PRI LB TON 7.24PM25-PRI LB TON 4.84Residential Heating: Distillate Oil (SCC 2104004000)PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 (Commercial/Institutional EF)PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 (Commercial/Institutional EF)PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.13Residential Heating: Natural Gas - All types (SCC 2104006000)PM10-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4.2PM25-FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP-42 Table 1.4.2PM-CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP-42 Table 1.4.2PM10-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60PM25-PRI LB E6FT3 7.60Residential Heating: Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2104007000)PM10-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Same factor used for Propane for Commercial Boilers;based on EIIP)PM25-FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP-42 Table 1.5-1 (Same factor used for Propane for Commercial Boilers;based on EIIP)PM-CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM-CON emission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (for allPM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emissionfactor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to lb/1,000 gallons of propane.Reference: AP-42, Table 1.4-2. Conversion factor assumes 1020 Btu/scf fornatural gas (AP-42, Table 1.4-2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP-42,Appendix A, page A-5).PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 0.91Residential Heating: Kerosene (SCC 2104011000)PM10-FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM25-FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP-42 Table 1.3-7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM-CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP-42 Table 1.3-2 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP)PM10-PRI LB E3GAL 2.38PM25-PRI LB E3GAL 2.131 PM10-PRI EF = sum of PM10-FIL and PM-CON emission factors;PM25-PRI EF = sum of PM25-FIL and PM-CON emission factors.48 Revisions to the NEI for residential LPG and ke rosene were completed after the preliminary 2002 NEI was released in February 2004. Connec ticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, and Rhode Island approved replacement of the preliminary 2002 NEI estimates with the revised estimates for LPG. Connecticut was the only State that elected to use the NEI for the residential kerosene category, and Connecticut approved replacing the preliminary 2002 NEI for this category with the revised inve ntory prepared by EPA.

Other Sources of PM Emissions

For States that provided onl y PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL emissions , PM10-PRI emissions were set equal to PM10-FIL emissions and PM25-PR I emissions were set equal to PM25-FIL

emissions. The PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions that were added to the inventory were assigned a data source code of S-02-X-PR wher e S-02-X represents the code assigned to the PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL emissions provided by the State agency and the “-PR” indicates that the ratio was applied to estimate the primary emissions (in this case, the ratio of primary to filterable emissions is “1”).

PM25-PRI emissions missing from State inventor ies were estimated by applying a ratio of

PM25-PRI-to-PM10-PRI emissions to the PM10-PR I emissions provided by the State agency. Table III-3 identifies the agencies with SCCs fo r which ratios were applied to estimate PM25-

PRI emissions. This table also shows the ratios and the reference for the ratios.49 Table III-3. SCCs for which PM25-PRI Em issions were Estimated by Applying a Ratio to the PM10-PRI Emissions in the State inventory

SCC SCC Description Agency Ratio of

PM25-

PRI to
PM10-

PRI Reference

2309100010 Industrial Processes: Fabricated Metals: SIC 34: Coating, E ngraving, and Allied Services: Electroplating NY 0.947 AP-42 emission factors for hard chrome plating tank controlled with mist eliminator. AP-42 (Table 12.20-3)
shows 94.7% of total PM as less than 2.35 micrometers. Applied factor to State-supplied PM10-PRI emissions to

estimate PM25-PRI emissions.

2461023000 Solvent Utilization: Miscellaneous Nonindustrial: Commercial: Asphalt Roofing: Total: All Solvent Types MA 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2601000000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery: On-site Incineration: All Categories: Total MD, NH 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI. 2610000100 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery: On-site Incineration: All Categories: Yard Waste - Leaf Species Unspecified NH 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2810001000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other
Combustion: Forest Wildfires: Total MD 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other Combustion: Prescribed Burning for Forest Management: Total MD 1 No data available; assumed PM25-PRI equals PM10-PRI.

2810020000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other Combustion: Prescribed Burning of Rangeland: Total MD 0.86 Based on ratio of PM25-PRI to PM10- PRI for same SCC used by States in

2002 NEI.

2810030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other
Combustion: Structure Fires: Total MD, NH 0.91 NEI Method.

2810050000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other
Combustion: Motor Vehicle Fires: Total MD, NH 0.91 NEI Method.

d. 2002 NEI

Merging of NEI Data in to State Inventories

The area source inventory provided by each Stat e agency was compared to the 2002 NEI to identify categories in the NEI that were not in each State inventory. The list of categories identified was provided to each State agency and each agency then selected the NEI categories to be added to its inventory. Iden tification of categories included in the 2002 NEI but not in a State inventory involved a two-step process. First, Pech an identified the categories in the NEI that did

not have an electronic match on th e data key of the EM table betw een the State inventory and the NEI. Then, Pechan manually compared the NEI categories without an electronic match to the State inventory to identify and eliminate NEI categories that were in the State inventory but had a different SCC. For example, a State inventor y may use a general SCC for a category while the NEI may use different SCCs to breakout emissions at a finer detail. Examples of categories where this typically occurred include the residen tial wood combustion, open burning of land clearing debris, solvent utiliza tion, and petroleum marketing and transportation categories. In50 addition, if a State agency requested that a MANE-VU-sponsored inventory be added to its inventory, the NEI categories that overlapped with the MANE-VU -sponsored categories were

removed from the list of NEI cate gories considered for incorporat ion into a State inventory.

The source categories in the 2002 NEI that were added to a State inventory can be identified

where the data source code starts with “E”. These categories can be identified using the data

source code field in the NIF 3.0 f iles or in the summary of area s ource emissions that contains

the data source code.

Revisions to the Preliminary 2002 NEI

During preparation of the MANE-V U inventory, EPA completed re visions to the emissions for six categories in the preliminary 2002 NEI released in February 2004. As agreed to with each State agency, the revised emissions were used in the MANE-VU inventory in lieu of the preliminary 2002 NEI emissions if the agency re quested that the categor y be included.

• Non-Residential Construction (SCC 2311020000) : 2002 emissions data replaced data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

• Highway Construction (SCC 2311030000): 2002 emissions data replaced data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

• Open Burning of Land Clearing Debr is (SCC 2610000500): 2002 emissions data replaced data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI. The activity for this categor y was based on activity prepared for the non-residential and highway construction categories. Fo r 2002, emissions were set to zero for counties with a population that was 80% ur ban or more based on 2000 Census data. This was not done for the 1999 NEI. For the NEI method, it was assumed that highly urban counties do not allow this act ivity to take place. Note that 2002 emissions data were already included in the preliminary 2002 NEI for the open burning of residential municipal solid wast e, open burning of yard waste, and the residential construction categories.

• Residential LPG Combustion (SCC 2104007000) : 2000 emissions data replaced data in the preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

• Residential Kerosene Combustion (SCC 2104011000): 2000 emissions data replaced data in the preliminary 2002 NE I that were carried forward from 1999

NEI.

• Residential Wood Combustion (SCCs starting with 2104008xxx; 4 SCCs for fireplaces and 3 SCCs for woodstoves): The preliminary 2002 NEI emissions were

revised to:51 • Correct the CO, PM10-PRI, and PM25- PRI emission factors for fireplaces without inserts (this cha nge doubled the emission factors associated with correcting an error in converting the values fr om g/kg to lb/ton);

• Correct the climate zone map for allo cating national activity to States;

• Replace 1997 total residential wood consumption with 2001 estimates (this change reduced wood consumption for fireplaces with inserts and woodstoves);

• Update urban/rural population data to reflect 2002 estimates based on year 2002 total county population and year 2000 county ratios of urban/rural population to total population; and

• Change the data source code from E-02- X (this was incorrect) to E-01-X to reflect 2001 activity data adjusted to 2002.

e. QA Review of Final Inventory

Final QA checks were run on the revised data set to ensure that all corrections provided by the State agencies were incorporated into the State inventories and that there were no remaining QA

issues that could be addressed during the duration of the project. After exporting the inventory in Oracle to an Access database in NIF 3.0, the EPA’s QA program was run on the Access database and the QA output was reviewed to verify that all QA issues that could be addressed were resolved (EPA, 2004a).

The output file from the EPA’s QA program r un on the area source inve ntory is provided in an Access 2000 database along with the Access da tabase containing the area source inventory

in NIF 3.0.

Additional Work on Area Source Methods

• Fugitive Dust Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads

Review of Methods

This work involved compiling and summarizi ng information on emission estimation methods and data sources from the MANE-VU State agencies, RPOs, and EPA for the following fugitive dust area source categories: windblown dust, paved and unpaved roads, agricultural tiling and harvesting, and construction activities. A short survey form was prepared and sent to the MANE-VU State agencies to collect informati on on whether an agency had activity for each category during 2002. For each agency for which activity occurred in its jurisdiction during 2002, information was requested on the methods a nd data sources it used to prepare its 2002 inventory for each category. This information wa s used to prioritize the categories (e.g., work on agricultural field burning was eliminated from fu rther consideration if MANE-VU State agencies52 did not have activity for this category). The methods and data applied by RPOs other than

MANE-VU were obtaine d from RPO websites and discussions with the RPOs.

The results of this review were documente d in a technical memorandum (MANE-VU, 2004b). Based on the results of the review, MANE-VU d ecided to proceed with developing a paved and unpaved road fugitive dust inventory that incorpor ated improvements to activity data used in the NEI methodology.

Methods for Improving Paved and Unpa ved Road Fugitive Dust Inventory

Fugitive dust emissions from paved and unpaved roads are classified under SCCs 2294000000 and 2296000000, respectively. Fugitive dust emissions from paved and unpaved road traffic were estimated for PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25- PRI, and PM25-FIL. Since these categories are not sources of PM-CON, PM10-PRI emission s are equal to PM10-FIL emissions and PM25- PRI emissions are equal to PM25-FIL. The following provides a summary of the methods.

Paved Roads

Several changes were made in the paved road fugitive dust emission calculations to improve these estimates over those prepared for EPA’s 2002 NEI. First, the monthly precipitation data representing the number of days in a month w ith at least 0.01 inches of precipitation were developed at the county level. In comparison, a single monthly precipitation value was used to

model an entire State in the 2002 NEI. Thus, the resulting MANE-VU county-specific paved road fugitive dust emission estimates should be more representative of each county than the NEI data since precipitation events can vary significantly from one part of the State to another.

The second improvement made to the paved road fugitive dust emission calculations was the use of county and road-type-specific av erage vehicle weights. This is an improvement over the NEI where a single average vehicle weight is applie d nationwide. Thus, in the MANE-VU inventory, county/road type combinations with significant he avy truck traffic have a higher average vehicle weight and a corresponding emission factor compar ed to county/road type combinations with primarily lighter vehicle traffic.

The final improvement made to the MANE-VU pave d road emission calculations was the use of the winter silt loading adjustments. These ad justments account for the application of sand and salt on the roads during months with frozen precipitation. Th e 2002 NEI does not include any wintertime silt loading adjustments. The effect of the wintertime silt loading adjustments is an increase in the paved road emissi on factors during the months in which it is applied. The months during which this adjustment was applied va ried by State in the MANE-VU inventory.

Unpaved Roads

The county-specific precipitation data used in the paved road fugitive dust calculations were also used to improve the unpaved road fugitive dust calculations. As with the paved roads, this represents an improvement over the State-spec ific precipitation data used in the 2002 NEI53 unpaved road emission inventory. The other impr ovement made to the unpaved roads was the use of State-supplied unpaved road m ileage data by county for Maine.

• Wildfires and Prescribed Burning

Review of Methods

This work involved compiling and summarizi ng information on emission estimation methods and data sources from the MANE-VU State agencies, RPOs, and EPA for the following area source categories: wildfires, prescribed burni ng, slash burning, and agri cultural field burning. The approach previously described for the f ugitive dust categories was used to collect and compile data from the MANE-VU State agencies, RPOs other than MANE-VU, and EPA for the fire categories. All of the in formation collected from these various information sources was summarized in a technical memorandum (MANE-VU, 2004c).

Results of Methods Review

MANE-VU recognized the need to improve the me thods for estimating emissions for the fire categories. The most important re vision would be to inventory fire events as point sources rather than as area sources at the county-level. Howe ver, due to resource cons traints, it was decided not to pursue improvements to the methods for estim ating emissions from the fire categories. It should be noted that during this project, some of the MANE-VU States provided revisions to their wildfire and prescribed burning inventorie s to add PM25-PRI emissions and to improve the spatial allocation of activity data at the county level. These improvements were incorporated into the MANE-VU area source inventory.

3. Version 3 Revisions

The following explains revisions to Version 3 that applied to several or all of the MANE-VU

States.

Gap Filling

In Version 2 of MANE-VU’s inventory, emissions for PFCs, industrial adhesives, and residential outdoor wood burning existed for some States but were missing for ot her States. Since these are categories for which SIP rules may be developed, it was determined that emissions for these categories should be added to Version 3. The following provides a summary of the Version 3 revisions to address missing data concerns for these categories:

• PFCs: MANE-VU estimated default 2002 emissi ons for these States using a per capita emission factor and county population data for each State. The derivation of the emission factor, population data, and cal culation of annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs is provided in an Excel file named “PFC _Adhesive Calcs for 2002_022106.xls” along with

this TSD.54 Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hamp shire, Rhode Island, and Vermont elected to use MANE-VU’s default inventory which was added to Version 3. Massachusetts elected to use the per capita em ission factor but provided revi sions to the population data, used 2002 owner occupied units to allocate th e emissions to counties, and then allocated emissions between the commercial (16%) and residential (84%) sect ors. Massachusetts’ calculations are provided in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named MA_AR_QA_Report_030806.xl s" provided with this TSD.

• Industrial Adhesives: Emissions for industr ial adhesives were missing in Version 2 for Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. MANE-VU estimated default 2002 emissions for these States using a per capita emission factor and county population data for each State. The derivation of the emission factor, population data, and cal culation of annual and daily VOC emissions for industrial adhesives is provided in an Excel file named “PFC_Adhesive Calcs for 2002_022106.xls” along with this TWD.

Massachusetts elected to use MANE-VU’s ga p-filling inventory which was added to

Version 3. The rest of the States elected to use EPA’s 2002 inventory which is based on a top-down, mass balance methodology where national industrial adhesive solvent estimates were allocated to counties using industrial employment. The EPA estimates were adjusted to remove uncontrolled VOC emissions included in the final 2002 point source NEI. The point-source adjustments were conducted at the county level. Note that the point-source-adjusted emissions for Rhode Island are zero for a ll three counties.

Note New Jersey is the only State that prep ared its own 2002 invent ory for this category

that is included in Version 3. The industrial adhesive inventory data for the rest of the MANE-VU States originates from the 1999 NEI. These States were contacted to determine if they wanted the 1999 data replaced with the default estimates or with the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesi ves. Maine commented that the 1999

estimates are more realistic of the solvent emissions for their State than the 2002 NEI or

MANE-VU default estimates. The other States did not indicate that they wanted their data replaced. Therefore, the 1999 NEI da ta for Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont was not changed in Version 3 of MANE-VU’s inventory.

• Residential Wood Burning: Residential outdoor wood burning emissions were missing in Version 2 of the MANE-VU inventory for the District of Columbia, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. In Versions 1 and 2, Ne w Jersey’s and New York’s emissions for outdoor wood burning were included with thei r inventory for indoor wood burning. The District of Columbia, Rhode Island, and Vermont elected to use MANE-VU’s outdoor wood burning inventory which was added to Version 3. In addition, per direction provided by New Jersey, its wood burning in ventory was replaced with the MANE-VUsponsored indoor wood burning inventory in Version 3, and the MANE-VU outdoor wood burning inventory was a dded to Version 3.55 New York’s inventory in Version 2 included emissions for both residential indoor and outdoor wood burning. For Vers ion 3, New York provided re visions that lowered its

overall emissions relative to Version 2 and br oke out its inventory to show emissions for fireplaces, woodstoves, and outdoor equipmen t separately. New York also added NH 3 emissions to its inventory for Version 3.

Adjustments to PM 2.5 Emissions for Fugitive Dust Categories

Information developed by the Western Gove rnors’ Association, Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Dust Emissi ons Joint Forum and EPA indicates that, for paved and unpaved roads and the construction nonpoi nt source categories, the PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratio is lower than the

ratio used in the EPA method to estimate PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions from PM10-PRI/-FIL emissions (WRAP, 2005). Therefore, for the fi nal 2002 NEI, EPA applied an adjustment factor

to the PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions to correct for overestimates of PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions for these categories. Because the PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratio used for the MANE-VU States is based on the EPA method, this information was communicated to the MANE-VU States a nd all of the States agreed that these adjustments should be made to the MANE-VU inventory. Table III-4 identifies the categories to which this adjust ment was applied, the old and new PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratios, and the adjustment factors applied to the PM25-PRI/-FIL emissions in Version 3 of MANE-VU’s inventory. Note that these adjustments to PM 2.5 emissions were applie d prior to applying the transport adjustment factors for PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions. The modelers applied the transport adjustment factors to the mass emissions in Vers ion 3. Documentation of the file containing the transport adjustment factors is provided under “S peciation Profiles” sect ion of Table VII-1 in Chapter VII.

For the construction categories, the EPA assumed an original PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratio of 0.15 and an adjustment factor of 0.67. However, the original PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratio used for both the NEI method and MANE-VU's inventory for construction is 0.2. Based on discussions with EPA, the goal is to revise the original PM 2.5 emissions such that the PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 ratio is 0.1. Therefore,

for Version 3 of MANE-VU's 2002 area source invent ory, an adjustment factor of 0.5 (ratio of 0.1-to-0.2) was applied to adjust the PM 2.5 emissions.

Note that based on Pechan’s discussions with EPA during the week of March 6, 2006 concerning the application of the paved road PM 2.5 adjustment factor, it was determined that adjusting the emissions by applying the factor (s hown in Table III-4) to the PM 2.5 emissions is a simplistic approach. The EPA noted that it is evaluating this issue and will be issui ng guidance in the near future for revising the equation for estimating PM 2.5 emissions which, when applied, will likely yield different results. Because EPA was unable to provide guidance on how to address this issue before Version 3 needed to be complete d during the week of Ma rch 6, the adjustment

factor shown in Table II I-4 was applied to the PM 2.5 emissions for paved roads because this adjustment will provide a better estimate of PM 2.5 emissions than the unadjusted emissions.56 Table III-4. Revisions to PM25-PRI and PM25-FIL Emissions for Paved and Unpaved Roads and Construction

SCC SCC Description Original

PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 Ratio Revised

PM 2.5 -to-PM 10 Ratio Adjustment

Factor 1,2

2294000000 Mobile Sources : Paved Roads : All Paved Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.25 0.15 0.6

2296000000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : All Unpaved Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67

2296005000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : Public Unpaved Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67

2296010000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : Industrial Unpaved Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67

2311000000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

All Processes : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311010000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Residential : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311010040 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :
Residential : Ground Excavations 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311020000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :
Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311020040 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :
Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Ground

Excavations 0.2 0.1 0.50

2311030000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :
Road Construction : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50

1 For these categories, filterable and primary emissions are equa l because they are not sources of condensible emissions. The adjustment factor was applied to both the PM25-PRI and PM25-FIL emissi ons and emission factors in the MANE-VU inventory.

2 See text for discussion of issue concerni ng the adjustment factor for paved road PM 2.5 emissions. Also, for c onstruction, see text for explanation of PM 2.5 adjustment factor shown in this table.

Removal of Invalid CE Records

For the following SCCs, Version 2 contained invalid CE records fo r Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont that

were removed in Version 3:

SCC SCC Description

2311020000 Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : I ndustrial/Commercial/Institutional : Total

2311030000 Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : Road Construction : Total 2610000100 Open Burning : All Categories : Yard Waste - Leaf Species Unspecified 2610000400 Open Burning : All Categories : Yard Waste - Brush Species Unspecified 2610030000 Open Burning : Residential : Household Waste

The CE records all originate from the prelimin ary 2002 NEI that have been removed from the final 2002 nonpoint NEI. They are invalid because they have a control efficiency value of 100% and corresponding records in the EM table with rule effectiveness and rule penetra tion values of 100% (implying that the emissions are zero), but with emissions greater than zero. The Excel spreadsheet file named “CE_records_removed fr om V3.xls” provides the CE records by State and county FIPS, SCC, and pollutant code that were removed in Version 3.57 4. Version 3 Emissions Summary

Table III-5 presents a State-level summary of the annual area source emissions in Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. Note that PM10-P RI and PM25-PRI emissions are included in the inventory for all SCCs for which Stat e agencies reported any form of PM, PM 10 , and/or PM 2.5 emissions. If an agency did not report PM 10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI but reported PM-PRI, PMFIL, PM-CON, PM10-FIL, and/or PM25-FIL, the PM augmentation procedures discussed in the TSD were applied to the form of PM emissions supplied by the agency to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM emissions. If an agen cy reported PM10-PRI and/or PM25-PRI emissions but not PM10-FIL, PM25-FIL, or PM-CON em issions, the agency's inventory was not augmented to calculate filterable or condensible emissions. Note that PM-CON is associated with only fuel combustion sources.

For NH 3 , the area source inventory includes emissi ons for natural sources for the following

States: SCCs 28060xxxxx for domes tic cats and dogs in Delawa re, Massachusetts, and New Jersey; 28070xxxxx for wild animals in Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York; and SCC 2810010000 for human perspi ration in Delaware, Massachus etts, and New Jersey. The area source inventory also includes NH 3 biogenic emissions (SCC 2701420000) for

Massachusetts.

Table III-5. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Area Source Emissions by State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO
x PM10-FIL PM10-

PRI PM25-

FIL PM25-

PRI PMCON SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 70,198 5,318 12,689 37,790 48,281 4,038 14,247 846 12,418 87,302

Delaware 14,052 13,279 2,608 12,910 13,039 3,075 3,204 128 1,588 15,519

District of
Columbia 2,300 14 1,644 5,745 6,293 507 1,029 147 1,337 6,432

Maine 109,223 8,747 7,360 155,237 168,953 19,090 32,774 686 13,149 100,621

Maryland 141,178 25,834 15,678 31,116 95,060 3,375 27,318 611 12,393 120,254

Massachusetts 136,552 18,809 31,358 150,046 192,839 23,354 42,067 1,156 54,923 162,016

New Hampshire 79,647 2,158 10,960 32,138 43,328 6,688 17,532 449 7,072 65,370

New Jersey 97,657 17,572 26,692 37,282 61,601 2,811 19,350 476 10,744 167,882

New York 356,254 67,422 98,803 288,991 369,595 30,894 87,154 102 130,409 507,292

Pennsylvania 266,935 79,911 47,591 363,173 391,897 51,792 74,925 266 63,679 240,785

Rhode Island 8,007 883 3,886 7,090 8,295 887 2,064 336 4,557 31,402

Vermont 43,849 9,848 3,208 51,392 56,131 6,729 11,065 180 4,087 23,265

MANE-VU 1,325,853 249,795 262,477 1,172,909 1,455,311 153,243 332,729 5,383 316,357 1,528,14158 B. State-Specific Methods

For each of the MANE-VU States, this section id entifies the temporal basis of the emissions

included in Version 3 and discusse s revisions incorporated into Version 3. In addition, this section also discusses the origin of each State agency’s emissions included in Version 3. For each agency, a table is provided in Appendix B th at lists the data source codes by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant. In addition, an electr onic folder is provided for each State agency containing the QA Summary Reports prepared for Versions 1, 2, and/or 3 and other files documenting revisions included in Versions 2 and 3. Except for Rhode Island, a QA Summary Report was prepared for Version 1. Subseque ntly, a QA Summary Report was prepared for States that provided Version 2 or 3 revisions. Rhode Island elected to use EPA’s draft 2002 NEI for Versions 1 and 2 but provide d revisions for Version 3; ther efore, a QA Summary Report is available for Version 3 only for Rhode Island.

1. Connecticut

Table III-6 shows the emission type periods for which Connecticut provided emissions.

Table III-6. Connecticut 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

Table B-1 in Appendix B identifies the data so urces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This ta ble also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Connecticut provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3.

Connecticut elected to use the EPA’s 2002 invent ory for industrial adhesives. Connecticut elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored invent ories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for indoor and outdoor residential wood combustion;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 emissions for industrial refrigeration processes;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; and

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 emissions for composting. Emissions for the remaining area source categor ies were taken from the draft 2002 NEI. For Connecticut, these emissions are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or carried forward59 from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. Data car ried forward from the 1999 NEI originate from

either State data included in the 1999 NEI or EPA data developed for the 1999 NEI.

2. Delaware

Table III-7 shows the emission type periods for which Delaware provided emissions.

Table III-7. Delaware 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20020831 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20020101 20020831 27

ANNUAL 20020512 20020512 30 DAILY 20020512 20020512 27

ANNUAL 20020629 20020629 30 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

ANNUAL 20021029 20021029 30 DAILY 20020629 20020629 27

ANNUAL 20021104 20021104 30 DAILY 20021029 20021029 27

ANNUAL 20021205 20021205 30 DAILY 20021104 20021104 27

DAILY 20021205 20021205 27

Table B-2 in Appendix B identifies the data so urces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This ta ble also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Delaware provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3, and used 2002 data that EPA prepared fo r the draft 2002 NEI or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the remaining categories. Dela ware elected to use th e EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives, and prepared its own invent ory for PFCs. Delaware elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, a nd PM25-FIL emissions for paved roads (note: there are no unpaved roads in Delaware);

• Annual and daily NH 3 emissions for POTWs; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO 2 emissions for open burning categories.60 3. District of Columbia

Table III-8 shows the emission type periods fo r which the District of Columbia provided

emissions.

Table III-8. District of Columbia 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

Table B-3 in Appendix B identifies the data so urces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This ta ble also shows the number of counties by SCC. The District of Columbia provi ded 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3. The District of Columbia prov ided annual VOC emissions for PFCs for Version 2 that were kept in Version 3. The District of Columbia elected to us e the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives and indoor wood burning. The exception is for the following categories

for which the District of Columb ia elected to use data from MANE-VU-sponsored inventories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, a nd PM25-FIL emissions for paved roads (note: there are no unpaved roads in the District of Columbia);

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 emissions for composting; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for open burning categories.

4. Maine

Table III-9 shows the emission type peri ods for which Maine provided emissions.

Table III-9. Maine 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

DAILY 20020601 20020929 2961 Table B-4 in Appendix B identifies the data so urces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This ta ble also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period comb inations are listed more than once because

the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Maine provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. Maine’s inventory for industrial adhesive s originates from the 1999 NEI. Maine provided annual and daily VOC and annual NH 3 emissions for industrial wastewater treatment that were added to

Version 3. Maine elected to use data from MA NE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, a nd PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; and

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 emissions for composting.

5. Maryland

Table III-10 shows the emission type periods fo r which Maryland provided emissions. Table B5 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by S CC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table al so shows the number of counties by SCC.

Table III-10. Maryland 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30

SEASONAL 20020401 20020930 30 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30

SEASONAL 20020401 20021031 30 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30

SEASONAL 20020601 20020831 30 MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30

DAILY 20020101 20021231 29 MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30

DAILY 20020401 20020930 29 MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30

DAILY 20020401 20021031 29 MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30

Maryland provided 2002 annual, seasonal, and daily emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3 and used 2002 data th at EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI for

industrial adhesives and commercia l cooking. Maryland prepared it s own inventory for PFCs.

Maryland elected to use data from MANE-VU-sp onsored inventories for the following source categories:62 • Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, a nd PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO 2 emissions for open burning categories; and

• Annual and monthly NH 3 emissions for agricultural crop fertilizers.

For Version 2, Maryland provided revisions to annual, seasonal , and daily VOC emissions for SCC 2505030120 (Storage and Transport : Petroleu m and Petroleum Product Transport : Truck : Gasoline). Maryland also removed PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL annual, seasonal, and daily records for open burning of land clearing de bris (SCC 2610000500). Maryland had revised the

PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI emissions in an earlie r version of the MANE-VU inventory but not

the PM10-FIL and PM25-FIL. As a result of revising the primary emissions, the filterable emissions were no longer met the consistency check as compared to the primary emissions.

QA of PM emissions in Version 3 identified one record for Maryland in county 510 for SCC 2801000003 (Agriculture - Crops : Tilling) wher e PM10-PRI annual emissions are 2317.2 tons

and PM25-PRI annual emissions are 0 tons. For th e other counties in Mary land with this SCC,

PM25-PRI emissions are about 20% of the PM10-PRI emissions. This issue was not addressed

due to time and resource constraints fo r completing revisions to Version 3.

6. Massachusetts

Table III-11 shows the emission type periods for which Massachusetts provided emissions.

Table III-11. Massachusetts 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

Table B-6 in Appendix B identifies the data so urces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This ta ble also shows the number of counties by SCC. Massachusetts provided 2002 annual and daily emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3 and used 2002 data th at EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI for residential coal combustion, asphalt r oofing, and agricultu ral livestock (NH 3 ).63 Massachusetts elected to use data from M ANE-VU-sponsored invent ories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, a nd PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for industrial adhesives and PFCs;

• Annual and daily NH 3 emissions for industrial refrigeration processes;

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 emissions for composting; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO 2 emissions for open burning categories.

For Version 2, Massachusetts revised annual a nd summer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for the following categories: aircraft refue ling, surface coating, degreasing, miscellaneous nonindustrial: consumer and commercia l products and pesticides, and ga soline service stations (stage 1: balanced submerged fill). Massachusetts also revised a nnual and daily emissions for 14 counties for forest wildfires, revised annual em issions for four counties for residential open burning of brush using the correct rule penetratio n factors for the counties, and revised control efficiency and control device data for sele cted categories in the CE table.

For Version 3, Massachusetts revised annual a nd summer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for auto refinishing. In the CE table, Massachuse tts changed control device code 102 (low-solvent coatings) to 000 (uncontrolled) and associated control efficiency va lues were set to null for all

counties. Massachusetts also added annual a nd summer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for gasoline service stations (stage 2: displacement loss/controlled).

For PFCs, Massachusetts elected to use the per capita emission fa ctor but provided revisions to the population data, used 2002 owner occupied units to allocate the emissi ons to counties, and

then allocated emissions betw een the commercial (16%) and re sidential (84%) sectors. Massachusetts’ calculations are provided in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named MA_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls".

7. New Hampshire

Table III-12 shows the emission type periods for which New Hampshire provided emissions. Table B-7 in Appendix B identifies the data so urces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This ta ble also shows the number of counties by SCC. New Hampshire provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. New Hampshire’s inventory for industrial ad hesives originates from the 1999 NEI.64 Table III-12. New Hampshire 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30

MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30

MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30

MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30

MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30

MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30

MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30

MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30

MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30

MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30

New Hampshire elected to use data from MA NE-VU-sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, a nd PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs;

• Annual and daily NH 3 emissions for industrial refrig eration processes and POTWs;

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 emissions for composting;

• Annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for open burning categories; and

• Annual and monthly NH 3 emissions for agricultural crop fertilizers and livestock.

Emissions for the remaining area source categor ies were taken from the draft 2002 NEI; these

emissions are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA da ta carried forward from final

Version 3 of the 1999 NEI.

New Hampshire provided revisions to Version 2 that were kept in Version 3. For Version 2, New Hampshire revised annual and daily VOC emi ssions for the gasoline storage and transport

sector to reflect revisions it made to the 2002 in ventory that EPA prepared for the 2002 NEI. The categories revised include bulk plant breathing losses, gasoline service stations (stages 1 and 2 total and underground tank breathing and empt ying losses), and gasoline tank trucks.65 8. New Jersey

Table III-13 shows the emission type periods for which New Jersey provided emissions.

Table III-13. New Jersey 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20011201 20020228 29

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

Table B-8 in Appendix B identifies the data so urces by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This ta ble also shows the number of counties by SCC. New Jersey provided 2002 emissions for the major ity of the area source categories. New Jersey provided its own 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives and PFCs. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draf t 2002 NEI (that are eith er based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANEVU-sponsored inventories. New Jersey elected to use MANE-VU- sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for

indoor and outdoor residential wood co mbustion (replacing New Jersey’s indoor

residential wood combusti on inventory provided in Versions 1 and 2);

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 emissions for industrial refriger ation processes and POTWs; and

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 emissions for composting.

For Version 3, New Jersey added annual and summer day VOC emissions for 21 counties for SCC 2501060100 (gasoline service stat ions : stage 2: total). Th e emissions are summarized in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named "NJ_AR_QA_Report_ 030806.xls". New Jersey provided 2002 emissions data for the industrial adhesives and PFC categories in Version 1. For Ve rsion 2, New Jersey corrected PM25-PRI emissions that were greater than PM10-PRI emissions for SCC 26010 00000 (on-site incineration : all categories : total).

9. New York

Table III-14 shows the emission type periods fo r which New York provided emissions. Table B9 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by S CC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission type period combina tions are listed more than once because the

data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission type period combination or66 because emissions are not reported for all polluta nts for the same SCC and emission type period

combination.

Table III-14. New York 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30

MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30

MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30

MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30

MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30

MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30

MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30

MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30

MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30

MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30

New York provided revisions to annual emissi ons for all 62 counties for the categories and pollutants shown in Table III-15. This revisi on completely replaced the 2002 emissions that New York provided in Version 2. Table III-15 also identifies categories and pollutants for which emissions were added to Version 3 (i.e., not in Ve rsion 2). The emissions are summarized in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revi sions" in the Excel file named NY_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls".

New York’s inventory in Version 2 included em issions for both reside ntial indoor and outdoor wood burning. For Version 3, New York provided re visions that lowered its overall emissions

relative to Version 2 and broke out its inventory to show emissi ons for fireplaces, woodstoves, and outdoor equipment separatel y. New York also added NH 3 emissions to its inventory for

Version 3. New York’s inventor y for industrial adhesives origin ates from the 1999 NEI. New York provided its own 2002 inventory for PFCs. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (t hat are either based on 2002 data prepared by

EPA or EPA data carried forward from fi nal Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VUsponsored inventories.

New York elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored i nventories for the followi ng source categories:

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 emissions for agricultural livestock; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for open burning categories.67 A QA issue that may affect the use of the M ANE-VU inventory for ai r quality modeling and revisions to the projection year invent ory is the addition of SCCs 2103004001 and 2103004002 by New York that are not in EPA’s master S CC list used by the EPA QA program. These SCCs are defined in Table III-15. In addition, th e QA program shows SCCs for PFCs and outdoor wood burning as invalid because EPA has not update d the master list to include these SCCs for the EPA QA program. These SCCs were included in Version 2 and should have been assigned speaciation profiles and included in the projectio n year inventory prepared from Version 2.68Table III-15. Summary of New York's Revisionsto Version 3 of MANE-VU's Area Source InventorySCC SCC Description Pollutant Type of Revision to EmissionsRevisions to Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery : Wastewater Treatment2630020000 Public Owned : Total Processed VOC Revised emissions for all pollutantsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Residential : Wood2104008001 Fireplaces: General VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added NH3, revised emissions for restof pollutants2104008052 Non-catalytic Woodstoves: Low Emitting VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants2104008070 Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutantsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Electric Utility2101001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX,CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2101002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total:All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2,PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissionsfor all pollutants2101004000 Distillate Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX,CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for allpollutants2101005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2101006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutantsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Industrial2102001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX,CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2102002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total:All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2,PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissionsfor all pollutants2102004000 Distillate Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX,CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for allpollutants2102005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2102006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2102007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions forall pollutants2102008000 Wood : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2102011000 Kerosene : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutantsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Commercial/Institutional2103001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX,CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2103002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total:All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2,PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissionsfor all pollutants2103005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2103004000 Residual Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX,CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Removed and replaced with data forSCCs 2103004001 and 21030040022103004001 Distillate Oil : Boilers VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2,PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants2103004002 Distillate Oil : IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, SO2,PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants2103006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2103007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Combustor TypesVOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2103008000 Wood : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2,PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2103011000 Kerosene : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants69Table III-15. Summary of New York'sRevisions to Version 3of MANE-VU's Area Source Inventory (Continued)SCC SCC Description Pollutant Type of Revision to EmissionsRevisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Residential2104001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI No change to emissions2104002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total:All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2104004000 Distillate Oil : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2104006010 Natural Gas : Residential Furnaces VOC, NOX, CO, SO2,PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2104007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Combustor TypesVOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants2104011000 Kerosene : Total: All Heater Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3,SO2, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI Added emissions for all pollutants70 10. Pennsylvania

Table III-16 shows the emission type periods for which Pennsylvania provided emissions.

Table III-16. Pennsylvan ia 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30

MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30

MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30

MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30

MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30

MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30

MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30

MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30

MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30

MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30

Table B-10 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area so urce inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC a nd emission type period combinati ons are listed more than once

because the data source codes are different fo r more than one SCC and emission type period combination. Pennsylvania provided 2002 emi ssions for the majority of the area source categories. Pennsylvania provi ded its own 2002 inventory for PFC s and residential indoor wood burning. Pennsylvania’s inventor y for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. Emissions for the remaining area source categorie s were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories.

Pennsylvania elected to use MANE-VU-sponsor ed inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 emissions for industrial refrigera tion processes and agricultural crop fertilizers and livestock;

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 emissions for POTWs and composting; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for open burning categories.71 11. Rhode Island

Table III-17 shows the emission type periods for which Rhode Island provided emissions.

Table III-17. Rhode Island 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

Table B-11 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area so urce inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Rhode Island provided 2002 annual VOC emissions for several solvent utilization categories (surface coating, degreas ing, graphic arts, rubber/plastics , and industrial adhesive); annual and daily VOC emissions for petroleum a nd petroleum product stor age (gasoline service stations and all transport type s); and annual VOC emissions for POTWs. Rhode Island’s indoor wood burning inventory originates from the draft 2002 NEI. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draf t 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forwar d from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VU-sponsored inventories.

Rhode Island elected to use MANE-VU-spons ored inventories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads; and

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs.72 12. Vermont

Table III-18 shows the emission type peri ods for which Vermont provided emissions.

Table III-18. Vermont 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types

Emission

Type
Period Start

Date End Date Emission Type

ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30

DAILY 20011201 20020228 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 27

DAILY 20020601 20020831 29

Table B-12 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission type period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area so urce inventory. This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Vermont provided 2002 annual VOC, NO

x , CO, PM10-PRI or PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI or PM25-FIL, and SO 2 emissions for residential fuel combusti on (distillate oil, natural gas, LPG, and indoor wood burning); annual VOC emissions for gasoline serv ice stations and breathing losses at bulk terminals; annual VOC, NO

x , CO, PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for residential open burning; annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI emissions for forest fires, and annual VOC, NO

x , CO, PM10-PRI, and PM25-PRI emi ssions for structure fires. Vermont’s inventory for industrial adhesi ves originates from the 1999 NEI.

For Version 2, Vermont provide d revisions to EPA’s draft 2002 inventory for SCC 2501050120 (bulk stations and terminals : breathing loss : gasoline) to incorporat e the effects of vapor

balance controls not accounted for in the EPA estimates. The revi sed inventory for this category was added to Version 2 (and kept in Version 3) that did not include this category. Control

records were added to the NIF 3.0 CE table for the counties with vapor balance controls. In addition, Vermont provided emissions for th ree counties (i.e., county FIPS codes 50015, 50017, and 50019) that were not in EPA's inventory. Em issions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are e ither based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA

data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE-VU-s ponsored inventories. Vermont elected to use MANE-VU-sponsored inve ntories for the following source categories:

• Annual and daily VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2 emissions for outdoor wood burning;

• Annual PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, and PM25-FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;

• Annual and daily NH 3 emissions for industrial refrig eration processes and POTWs;

• Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs;

• Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 emissions for composting; and

• Annual VOC, NO

x , CO, NH 3 , PM10-PRI, PM10-FIL, PM25-PRI, PM25-FIL, and SO 2 emissions for open burning categories.73 C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?

This section provides a summary of potential revisions to incorporat e into future versions of the MANE-VU area source inventory.

All States – A coordinated effort between the State agencies should be developed to apply

consistent methods to avoid havi ng to apply procedures to augmen t inventory data to correct for the QA issues and fill in missing data as discussed previously in this chapter. For example, this will ensure that consistent methods are applied across State agencies to ensure consistent and accurate reporting of source categories using th e same SCCs across States, PM emissions, and minimize other QA issues that were identified du ring the development of Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the inventory.

For PM emissions, the State agencies should develop and apply a consistent method for including condensible emissions for fuel comb ustion sources that can be applied when the agencies develop their inventories. This ma y include compiling the emission factors for all forms of PM into one database, organized by SCC and control type (for filterable emissions), and sharing the database among the MANE-VU State agen cies. Use of a consistent set of emission factors will help to avoid the PM consistency issues identified in Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the MANE-VU inventory as well as en sure that condensible emissions are included in the primary emissions reported in the inventory.

State-specific suggestions are as follows:

Delaware: Revise the residential wood combustion emissions inventory with the latest revisions sponsored by MARAMA.

Rhode Island: This State felt that the area s ources (from the nonpoint inventory EPA prepared) which they had changed to zeros in Version 3 would revert back to the Version 2 numbers which were from the EPA report. Rhode Island would like to see this change in the next version of the inventory. (Table with change s can be received upon request).

New Jersey:

• Why is the EPA VOC emission factor for firepl aces completely out of proportion with the

other emission factors? The ratio of conve ntional wood stoves/fireplaces = 0% to 10% for other pollutants and is 77% for VOC. It is discussed in the P echan Technical Memo #5, 9/3/03, page 19, how a study of the accuracy of the emission factors showed the VOC should be more like 10 to 30 lb/ton, instead of 229 lb/ton and the woodstove emission factors (certified) should be higher than Emission Inve ntory Improvement Program guidance.

• The summer seasonal adjustment factors fo r indoor wood burning used in the model appear high. This combined with the ve ry high VOC emission factor results in high ozone season wood burning emissions.74 • In general, the accuracy of the very large residential wood burning numbers, all pollutants.

• The large fugitive dust inventory numbers don not correlate to dust found in monitors,

even with the latest 30% to 40% reduc tion in paved and unpaved road emissions.

• We need consistent guidance from the EP A for adhesives and sealants, PFC, and commercial cooking.75 CHAPTER IV

– NONROAD SOURCES

A. General Methods for all States

This section provides an overview of the data sources and QA steps used in preparing the 2002 nonroad sector inventory for the MANE-VU States. The nonroad se ctor is comprised of nonroad engines included in EPA’s NONROAD model, as well as other engines not modeled in NONROAD, including aircra ft, commercial marine vessels and locomotives.

1. What Data Sources Were Used?

Data sources used for the various nonr oad categories are described below.

a. Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Categories

As a starting point, aircraft, commercial marine vessel and locomotive inventories were prepared using the inventories that State agencies submitted to the EPA in June 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. In addition, some States provided data directly to MANE-VU for use in this inventory that were not submitted for the CERR.

Missing data were supplemented with estimates from EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. For the

aircraft and commercial marine vessel source categories, the 2002 NEI CAP emissions were estimated by carrying over th e 2001 estimates. 2001 emissions were estimated using the methodologies described in EPA’s Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine Vessel, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Inventory (EPA, 2003b).

The 2002 locomotive emissions were calculated using 2002 activity data and the methodologies described in the EPA, 2003b documentation.

Table IV-1 provides a summary of the aircraft, commercial marine, and locomotive emission SCCs reported in the MANE-VU in ventory. Table IV-2 provides a summary of the basis for these nonroad subsector emissions by State.76Table IV-1. List of Unique Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive SCCs Reported by States in MANE-VU InventorySCC SCC Description 1 SCC Description 2 SCC Description 3 SCC Description 42275000000 Mobile Sources Aircraft All Aircraft Types and Operations Total2275001000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Military Aircraft Total2275020000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Commercial Aircraft Total: All Types2275050000 Mobile Sources Aircraft General Aviation Total2275060000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Air Taxi Total2275070000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Aircraft Auxiliary Power Units Total2280000000 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial All Fuels Total, All Vessel Types2280002000 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Total, All Vessel Types2280002010 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Ocean-going Vessels2280002020 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Harbor Vessels2280002100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels,Commercial Diesel Port emissions2280002200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Underway emissions2280003100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels,Commercial Residual Port emissions2280003200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Underway emissions2285000000 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment All Fuels Total2285002000 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Total2285002005 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Total Line Haul Locomotives2285002006 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment DieselLine Haul Locomotives: Class I Operations2285002007 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: Class II / III Operations2285002008 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: Passenger Trains (Amtrak)2285002009 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: Commuter Lines2285002010 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Yard Locomotives77Table IV-2. Summary of Basis for 2002 MANE-VU Aircraft, Commercial Marine,and Locomotive InventoryBasis for Subsector of Nonroad InventoryFIPSST State Aircraft Commercial Marine Vessels Locomotives09 Connecticut 2002 Preliminary NEI 2002 Preliminary NEI State supplied in March 200610 Delaware June 2004 CERR Submittal; Statesupplied revisions in Sep 2004June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal11 District of Columbia Not supplied by State and not availablefrom NEI2002 Preliminary NEI June 2004 CERR Submittal23 Maine State supplied in Oct 2004 State supplied in Oct 2004 State supplied in Oct 200424 Maryland June 2004 CERR Submittal; Statesupplied revisions in Sep 2004June 2004 CERR Submittal; Statesupplied revisions in Oct 2004June 2004 CERR Submittal25 Massachusetts June 2004 CERR Submittal State-supplied for June 2004 CERRSubmittal, with revisions as directed byStateJune 2004 CERR Submittal33 New Hampshire June 2004 CERR Submittal 2002 Preliminary NEI June 2004 CERR Submittal34 New Jersey June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal36 New York 2002 Preliminary NEI State supplied in Oct 2004 2002 Preliminary NEI42 Pennsylvania State supplied to Pechan inJune 2004 State supplied to Pechan in June2004 State supplied to Pechan in June 2004;State supplied revisions in Aug 200544 Rhode Island State-supplied for June 2004 CERRSubmittal, with revisions as directed byStateState-supplied for June 2004 CERRSubmittal, with revisions as directed byStateState-supplied in Oct 200450 Vermont 2002 Preliminary NEI Not supplied by State and not availablefrom NEINot supplied by State and not availablefrom NEI78 b. NONROAD Model Categories

NONROAD model categories include equipment su ch as recreational marine and land-based vehicles, farm and construction machinery, and lawn and garden equipment. Aircraft ground support equipment (GSE) and rail maintenance equipment are also included in NONROAD. These equipment are powered by diesel, gaso line, compressed natural gas (CNG) and LPG engines.

EPA released a final version of NONR OAD during December 2005 called NONROAD2005 (EPA, 2005a). To reflect the updates made to EPA’s final NONROAD model, all MANE-VU

Version 2 NONROAD model estimates were replaced with updated NONROAD2005 emission

estimates.

EPA also released an updated version of its NMIM, which incorporates the final

NONROAD2005 model. EPA’s NMIM2005 is a consolidated modeling system that incorporates the NONROAD and MOBILE models, along with a county database of inputs (EPA, 2005b). The NMIM county database contai ns monthly input data to reflect countyspecific fuel parameters and temperatures. Becau se incorporating revised monthly inputs for use in NMIM2005 is more efficient than preparing county-specific monthly option files needed to run NONROAD2005 independently, Pechan used NM IM2005 for most MANE-VU States. The two exceptions were for the District of Columbia and Maine due to the differences in oxygenated fuel inputs used for NMIM versus NONROAD.

As a first step, Pechan compiled fuel input data available from NMIM2005 by county and by

month for all MANE-VU states for 2002. Pechan developed a spreadsheet that summarized the gasoline RVP, gasoline weight pe rcent oxygen, and gasoline and di esel sulfur content proposed as inputs to the updated runs. Values consiste nt with State-supplied MOBILE6 inputs used for the development of 2002 MANE-VU highway vehicl e inventories were presented for use where they differed from NMIM. Pechan requested that States confirm the use of these data for the NONROAD model runs, or provide alternative inputs.

The final county, monthly NMIM inputs provided or confirmed by the States for RVP, weight percent oxygen, and gasoline sulf ur are presented in Appendix C, Table C-1. Pechan used

NMIM’s 2002 default value for nonroad diesel su lfur content. This value is 2,457 parts per million (ppm) for land-based equipment, and 2,767 ppm for recreati onal marine, for all

MANE-VU counties.

Pechan also requested that States provide a ny local activity data in the format of updated

NONROAD external data files. These include da ta files which specify activity parameters such as equipment populations, equipment annual hours of use, county allocation factors, and monthly allocation profiles.

Pechan updated the NMIM county database for 2002 to add in new gasoline profiles to reflect the monthly and county fuel input values provi ded by States. Pechan also updated the NMIM county database to cross refere nce the State-supplied NONROAD data files that replaced default79 NONROAD2005 inputs. Pechan then ran NM IM/NONROAD2005 at the county and monthly level for 2002 and generated the results in NIF 3.0.

c. NONROAD2005 Model Runs

The majority of the model runs were pe rformed using NMIM2005. NMIM and NONROAD have differences in the required format of the oxygenated fuel inputs. For NONROAD, this variable is required to be expr essed as a composite weight per cent oxygen that accounts for the market share and the percent oxygen of all cont ributing oxygenates. Since NMIM models HAP emissions, the volume percent and market share of each of four oxygenates must be entered as fuel inputs. These oxygenates incl ude methyl tertiary butyl ethe r (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), ethanol (ETOH), and tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME). In cases where only one known oxygenate is present, this is straightforward to reflect in NMIM, as weight percent can be easily converted to volume percent. However, two States (the District of Columbia and Maine) provided a composite we ight percent value for more th an one oxygenate, but could not provide the corresponding volume percent and market share for each oxygenate to use in NMIM. As such, Pechan used NONROAD2005 for both the Dist rict of Columbia and Maine so that their submitted values for weight percent oxygen c ould be used directly. The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures in cluded in NMIM2005 were used to calculate average monthly temperature i nputs to NONROAD for both States.

Pechan developed monthly NONROAD option f iles and ran these files through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory. Pechan performed additional calculations using NMIM emission factors and fuel consumption to

calculate NH 3 , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 emissions.

2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?

The final MANE-VU nonroad invent ory was comprised of emission es timates that were either: 1) submitted by States for the June 2004 CERR submittal or as additional revisions after this date; 2) developed using NONROAD model inputs provided or a pproved by States; or 3) reported by EPA in the preliminary 2002 NEI. As such, the QA steps were tailored to each of these types of submittals. Note that a Quality Assurance Plan was prepared prior to initiating work on Version 1 (MANE-VU, 2003). This plan was applied during development of all three versions of the MANE-VU inventory.

a. Summary of QA checks for State emission submittals

Nonroad emission submittals were accepted as part of the June 2004 CERR submittals to EPA or as direct submittals to MANE-VU. Upon receipt of an emissions submittal, Pechan prepared spreadsheets providing a unique list of errors identified by running the EPA NIF 3.0 QA software tool on the nonroad source inventory (EPA, 2004a). Notes were provided to identify the NIF 3.0 tables in which the errors appeared, as well as clarification as to where an error occurred (e.g., for what SCC and pollutant). Fo r many of the errors, Pech an provided a potential correction, and States indicated whether they agreed with the correction, or provided their own80 instructions for correcting the error. These spreadsheets serv ed to document each state's

direction on how to correct erro rs and the state's representati ve authorizing the correction.

The list of general QA checks include the following:

• Duplicate records (i.e., only one record al lowed for each unique county/SCC/ pollutant) • Invalid record type • Mandatory field is not populated • Invalid field length • Invalid data type (e.g., in valid SCCs or pollutants) • “Out-of-range” emission values • Referential integrity (i.e., the presence of widow or orphan records in the NIF 3.0 relational tables)

Note that EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool also checks for other specific QA issues by field not listed above. See EPA’s User Guide, Appendix A for a listing of all poten tial errors that are checked by the program, and EPA’s guidance for how they should be resolved.

Pechan also performed other general QA procedur es outside of EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool, including pollutant augmentation, SCC reconc iliation, and completene ss and reasonableness

checks.

Pechan performed pollutant augmentation in cases where the complete set of CAPs and NH 3 were not provided by a State. For example, se veral States did not pr ovide PM25-PRI, but did provide PM10-PRI, so that PM25-PRI was es timated using EPA-published particle-size multipliers. Where multipliers were not avai lable from EPA documentation, Pechan used available pollutant emission estimates reporte d by all other MANE- VU States to develop “emission ratios” for a given SCC. These “emission ratios” were then used to multiply available pollutant estimates to estimate values for the mi ssing pollutants. Specific values used for a given

State and SCC are cited in the “State -Specific Methods” section below.

In addition, SCC assignments were reviewed and r eassigned after clarificati on from States as to what the specific SCC estimate represented. For ex ample, a State may have reported all aircraft activity under one of the specific aircraft type SCCs (e.g., commercial or general aviation), when it should more accurately be reported under the general SCC 2275000000 (All Aircraft Types and Operations).

Finally, completeness checks were performed on th e inventory to determine that emissions for nonroad categories known to operate in a State or county were being reported. Note that emissions may not be reported for all NONROAD SCCs for all counties in the MANE-VU RPO, and will depend on the geographic allocation methods used by the model, or specific allocation data provided by a State.

NONROAD model category estimates originally provided by States for the June 2004 submittal were replaced by emission estimates develope d using NMIM/NONROAD 2005. As such, this81 TSD will not document corrections made by Pechan to these original NONROAD model estimates, since they were replaced for Version 3.

b. Data input summary spre adsheets for State review

As mentioned above for NONROAD model cat egories, Pechan prepared the MANE-VU emission estimates using EPA’s final NMIM/NONR OAD2005 model. An important QA step in running NONROAD is to ensure that the inputs used for fuel specifications and temperatures for a given county and month in 2002 are representa tive. As such, Pechan compiled the RVP, percent oxygen, and gasoline su lfur inputs reported by NMIM2005 by county and month for States to review. If a State had previously submitted input data for the MANE-VU onroad inventory, these data were proposed in lieu of NM IM data. States either confirmed use of the default NMIM/onroad MANE-VU input s, or provided alternate data in the specified format to replace the proposed inputs. Pechan updated the gasoline table in the NMIM county database to add in new gasoline profiles to reflect revised fuel input values provi ded by States. These profiles were then cross-referenced to the approp riate county and month in a separate table called countyyearmonth . Pechan performed QA checks of these NM IM county database tables for each

State to ensure that the correct fuel data were input by county and by month as requested by the

State.

c. QA of final mass emissions

After performing QA of the inputs, Pechan ran NMIM/NONROAD2005 at the county and monthly level for 2002 and genera ted the results in NIF 3.0. As a QA step, Pechan ran EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool on the NIF 3.0 files. Erro rs identified were resolved and checked to ensure they were corrected in the final files.

As part of final processing of the inventories, and to assist in tracki ng revisions and preparing emission summaries, Pechan added the followi ng NIF plus fields to each table:

TblCE : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date TblEM : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date, CAP/HAP, Year, Emission Ton Value, Emission Type Period TblEP : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date TblPE : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date TblTR : State FIPS, County FIPS, Revision Date

Data source codes are included to document the origin of the emissions data, which assists in tracking and quality-assuring revisions made to the emission estimates. Table IV-3 provides a listing of the data source codes included in th e MANE-VU nonroad invent ories, as well as a definition of each code. State FIPS and County FI PS are separated out to assist in developing area-specific emission summaries, and the Emissi on Ton Value places all emissions on the same basis. The Emission Type Period describes the tem poral basis of the estimates (in this case, they are all annual). Finally, the Revision Date tracks when reco rd-specific changes are made.82 Table IV-3. Data Source Code Descriptions

Data
Source Code Description
E-02-F E = EPA-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -F = emissions are carried fo rward for inclusion in the 2002 base year
E-02-X E = EPA-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -F = emissions are not gr own or carried forward P-02-X P = RPO-generated data; -02 = year 2002; -X = emissions are not grown or carried forward S-02-X S = State data; -02 = year 2002 data; -X = emissions are not grown or carried forward

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries

Table IV-4 presents a summary of the annual 200 2 nonroad sector pollutant emissions for each MANE-VU State, as well as a regional total. These emissi ons include SCCs for all NONROAD model engines, as well as aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and locomotive categories, where applicable, for each State. Table IV-5 pres ents the emission results for NONROAD model equipment only, while Table IV-6 provides emissi on estimates for aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and locomotive categories separately.

Table IV-4. Annual 2002 Nonroad Sect or Emissions by MANE-VU State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO x PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 276,773.0 16.6 25,460. 2 1,952.1 1,793.9 2,087.4 33,880.2

Delaware 68,782.0 5.2 16,22 6.5 1,021.4 925.6 3,983.3 8,010.1

District of Columbia 18,844.7 2.4 3,571.3 310.2 298.7 375.4 2,072.5

Maine 153,423.6 11.4 9,820.4 1,436.8 1,329.4 916.8 31,144.1

Maryland 437,400.3 28.2 37,472. 2 4,936.0 4,357.1 7,941.6 56,330.4

Massachusetts 461,514.3 28.2 42,76 8.5 3,531.2 3,226.4 3,791.2 56,748.5

New Hampshire 130,782.2 9.1 9, 912.1 1,057.8 965.4 891.0 22,376.5

New Jersey 704,396.4 43.0 63,479. 0 5,495.1 4,997.2 15, 686.0 83,918.9

New York 1,233,968.3 79.3 109,878.3 9,605.3 8, 820.9 12,919.7 157,611.7

Pennsylvania 931,978.0 55.0 103,824. 2 9,737.9 8,440.1 7,915.0 102,331.0

Rhode Island 73,012.7 4.1 5,001.5 500.2 443. 1 377.2 7,779.7

Vermont 62,248.1 4.5 4,217.1 529.9 485. 8 372.1 10,547.6

Total MANE-VU 4,553,123. 5 286.9 431,631.3 40, 113.9 36,083.6 57, 256.6 572,751.383 Table IV-5. Annual 2002 NONROAD2005 M odel Emissions by MANE-VU State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO x PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 274,387.6 16.6 17,897. 0 1,712.9 1,577.6 1,376.6 33,519.0

Delaware 65,954.1 4.9 5, 798.3 570.4 525.1 513.0 7,530.5

District of Columbia 18,774.9 2.4 3,066.4 298.4 287.8 341.3 2,052.9

Maine 148,555.3 11.4 8,228.9 1 ,204.2 1,135.1 771.8 30,741.0

Maryland 424,776.8 28.2 27,789. 1 3,118.7 2,870.4 2,569.2 53,035.0

Massachusetts 448,398.7 28.2 30,04 6.7 2,887.2 2,658.8 2,428.1 54,835.8

New Hampshire 128,571.5 9.1 8 ,149.5 946.8 871.7 672.7 22,237.8

New Jersey 692,547.9 43.0 43,515. 2 4,285.4 3,950.5 3,524.9 81,900.4

New York 1,219,308.7 79.3 78,648. 3 8,338.9 7,677.1 6,966.3 155,475.1

Pennsylvania 903,167.7 55.0 62,265. 2 6,281.5 5,784.3 5,292.4 99,240.9

Rhode Island 71,573.1 4.1 4 ,563.9 402.8 371. 1 335.5 7,698.7

Vermont 61,732.1 4.5 4,169. 9 517.6 476.6 367.6 10,520.4

Total MANE-VU 4,457,748. 6 286.6 294,138.2 30,564.8 28, 186.1 25,159.4 558,787.4

Table IV-6. Annual 2002 Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Emissions by MANE-VU State (Tons/Year)

State CO NH 3 NO x PM10-PRI PM25-PRI SO 2 VOC

Connecticut 2,385.4 0.0 7 ,563.2 239.2 216. 4 710.8 361.2

Delaware 2,827.9 0.3 10,42 8.2 451.1 400.5 3,470.3 479.6

District of Columbia 69.7 0.0 505.0 11.8 10.9 34.1 19.7

Maine 4,868.3 0.0 1,591. 5 232.6 194.3 145.0 403.1

Maryland 12,623.5 0.0 9,683. 2 1,817.3 1,486.7 5,372.3 3,295.4

Massachusetts 13,115.6 0.0 12, 721.7 644.0 567.6 1,363.1 1,912.7

New Hampshire 2,210.7 0.0 1 ,762.5 111.0 93. 7 218.3 138.6

New Jersey 11,848.5 0.0 19,963. 9 1,209.7 1,046.7 12,161.1 2,018.6

New York 14,659.6 0.0 31,230. 0 1,266.4 1,143.8 5,953.4 2,136.6

Pennsylvania 28,810.2 0.0 41,55 9.0 3,456.4 2,655. 8 2,622.7 3,090.2

Rhode Island 1,439.6 0.0 437.6 97.4 72.1 41.7 81.0

Vermont 516.0 0.0 47. 3 12.2 9.2 4.5 27.2

Total MANE-VU 95,374.9 0.3 137,4 93.1 9,549.1 7,897.4 32,097.3 13,963.984 B. State-Specific Methods

The following sections describe the methods us ed and QA issues addres sed for each MANE-VU State in developing Version 3.0 of M ANE-VU’s nonroad sect or inventory.

1. Connecticut

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan ran EPA’s NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Pechan incorporated Connecticut-supplied data for gaso line sulfur content and RVP into the NMIM

database. Pechan used NMIM defaults for di esel sulfur content and for weight percent oxygenate values. The final input data by c ounty and by month are summarized in Table B-1.

Aircraft and commercial marine vessel emissi ons are based on the preliminary 2002 nonroad NEI. In March 2006, Connecticut provided county-level emission estimates for VOC, NO

x , and

CO for all line-haul and sw itchyard locomotive SCCs.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

For commercial aircraft (S CC 2275020000), PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not reported in the EPA’s NEI. For completeness, Pechan estimat ed PM10-PRI emissions by applying an average

PM10-PRI/NO

x emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO

x emissions. Commer cial aircraft PM25- PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

Because EPA’s NEI does not include locomotive category emission estimates for Connecticut, and since Connecticut only provi ded emission estimates for VOC, NO

x , and CO, estimates are still missing for PM10-PRI, PM25-PRI, and SO 2

.

2. Delaware

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Delaware approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. The final fuel input data by county and by

month are summarized in Table B- 1. Delaware provided updated f iles listed in Table IV-7 to replace the default files used in NMIM. These included county allocation files for five nonroad categories, and a revised equipm ent population file with updated populations for specific SCCs.85 Table IV-7. Delaware NONROAD External Data Files

County NR File Name File Type 10000air.alo County allocation for airport GSE 10000gc.alo County allocation for golf carts 10000hou.alo County allocation for lawn & garden 10000log.alo County allocation for logging 10000rvp.alo County allocation for land-based recreational 10000.pop Equipment population

Pechan used Delaware’s June 2004 CERR submitta l as the basis for aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel category estimat es in the 2002 MANE-VU inventory.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In September 2004, Delaware provided correctio ns to the general aviation emissions (SCC 227505000) for all pollutants for Kent County to a dd in general aviation activity at Dover Air

Force Base.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by

Delaware. Commercial ai rcraft (SCC 2275020000) included emission estimates for all pollutants except PM25-PRI. Pechan calculated commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM10-PRI is PM25-PRI (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

3. District of Columbia

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan developed NONROAD Model SCC emi ssions for District of Columbia using NONROAD2005. NONROAD2005 was used directly instead of NMIM 2005 to incorporate State-supplied weight percent oxygen data. The District of Columb ia also requested changes to the default NMIM RVP and gasoline values for some months. The final fuel input data by county and by month are summarized in Table B-1.

The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures included in NMIM were used to calculate average monthly temperature i nputs to NONROAD. Pech an developed monthly NONROAD2005 option files for the Di strict of Columbia. Pechan ran the option files through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory. Pechan performed additional ca lculations using NMIM emission factors and NONROAD2005 fuel consump tion to calculate NH 3 , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 emissions. NMIM reports NH 3 emission factors of 116 grams NH 3 per gallon gasoline for gasoline engines, and 83 grams NH 3 per gallon fuel for diesel engines.86 The District of Columbia pr ovided locomotive emissions for their nonroad sector June 2004

CERR submittal.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file , and revised the file to addr ess QA issues as approved by the

District of Columbia. PM emissions in th e inventory were not id entified as either PM 10 or PM 2.5 , nor were the emissions identified as primary or f ilterable. The District of Columbia authorized Pechan to change PM to PM10-PRI. Locomotiv e PM25-PRI emissions were estimated using the assumption that 90 percent of PM 10 is PM 2.5 (EPA, 2003b). Hydrocarbon (HC) pollutant emissions were also removed from the inventory, as this is not a valid pollutant code in NIF3.0.

Pechan added commercial marine vessel emissi ons from the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI.

There are no aircraft emission estimates in the NE I for the District of Columbia, since there are not airports located in th e District of Columbia.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

4. Maine

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan developed NONROAD model SCC em issions using NONROAD2005. For Maine, weight percent oxygen values were submitted base d on actual fuel survey results by county and by month, but Maine had not tracked the corr esponding oxygenate volume percent and market share. As such, Pechan used NONROAD2005 so th at Maine’s values for weight percent oxygen could be reflected. Maine also provided revision s to the RVP and gasoline sulfur values reported in NMIM2005. Pechan developed NONROAD2005 monthly option files for two county groups

in Maine that shared values for all three fu el inputs (see Appendix C, Table C-1). The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatur es included in NMIM were used to calculate average monthly temperature inputs to NONROAD. Pechan ran the option files through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory. Pechan performed additional ca lculations using NMIM emission factors and fuel consumption to calculate NH 3 , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 emissions. NMIM reports NH 3 emission factors of 116 grams NH 3 per gallon gasoline for gasoline engines, and 83 grams NH 3 per gallon fuel for diesel engines.87 i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In October 2004, Maine provided aircraft, co mmercial marine vessel, and locomotive SCC emissions to be added to their inventory. Commercial marine emissions submitted by Maine only represented in-port emissions. Diesel and residual commercial marine underway emissions (SCCs 2280002200 and 2280003200) were based on EPA’s 2002 preliminary NEI.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

PM25-PRI estimates were missing from all aircra ft SCC records provided by Maine. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplie r of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004). In-port commer cial marine emissions (SCC 2280002100) were missing estimates for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI. Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by applying a PM10-PRI/NO

x emission ratio of 0.042 to available NO

x emissions. PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.92 (EPA, 2003b).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

5. Maryland

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to prepare NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Maryland reviewed the default NMIM inputs and provide d revisions to the input values for RVP and weight percent oxygen for all months. Maryland requested that a value of 2.1 percent oxygen be used for all counties and months. This weight percent value was then converted to a volume percent of 11.8 percent for use in NMIM, assu ming MTBE was the only oxygenate. In addition, gasoline sulfur content revisions were incorporated into NMIM for select counties for the months of April through September. The final fuel i nput data by county and by month are summarized

in Table B-1.

Maryland also provided updated file s listed in Table IV-8 to repl ace the default files used in NMIM. These included county allocation files for several nonroad categories.

Table IV-8. Maryland NONROAD External Data Files

County NR File Name File Type 24000pop.alo County allocation for several nonroad categories (population) 24000con.alo County allocation for construction 24000hou.alo County allocation for lawn & garden88 Pechan used Maryland’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the MANE-VU inventory for the aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In September 2004, Maryland provided revised ai rcraft and commercial marine vessel emission estimates. Pechan replaced the aircraft and commercial marine vessel emissions from their

CERR submittal with the revised emissions.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by Maryland. Maryland did not provide PM25-PRI aircra ft emissions in their inventory. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplie r of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

6. Massachusetts

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NON ROAD model SCC emission estimates. Massachusetts reviewed the NMIM inputs and ap proved of the fuel input values for RVP and gasoline sulfur content. NMIM2005 reported a weight percent oxygen of 2.1 percent for all

months for all counties in Massach usetts, and the State requested a value of 1.5 percent be used for all counties from October through April. Th is weight percent value was then converted to a volume percent of 8.4 percent for use in NMIM, given that MTBE was the only oxygenate. Final fuel input data by county and by month are presented in Table B-1.

Massachusetts provided annual emissions for airc raft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories for their nonroad sector CERR submitta l. These inventories included all CAP.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

Massachusetts requested that P echan incorporate revisions supp lied for annual emissions for inport diesel commercial marine (SCC 2280002010) for Dukes County (25007).89 b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan changed the aircraft SCC “2275050000” to “2275000000,” since Massachusetts verified that this emission record repr esents all aircraft types, not just general aviation.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

7. New Hampshire

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONRO AD model SCC emission estimates. New Hampshire reviewed and approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel i nput data by county and month.

Pechan used New Hampshire’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the MANE-VU aircraft and locomotive inventory. Pechan adde d commercial marine vessel emissions from the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file , and revised the file to addr ess QA issues as approved by New Hampshire. New Hampshire did not provide PM 10 and PM 2.5 aircraft emissions in their inventory. New Hampshire authorized Pechan to develop aircraft PM 10 emissions for all aircraft types by applying an average PM10/NO

x emission ratio to the aircraft NO

x emissions in their inventory. The PM 10 /NO

x ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplyi ng PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For commercia l aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM 10 is PM 2.5 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

8. New Jersey

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New Jersey approved of the default fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. New Jersey provided an updated data input file90 containing revised equipment popul ations (34000.pop) for specific SCCs for the NMIM model

runs.

Pechan used New Jersey’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel catego ries. These inventor ies included all CAPs.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file , and revised the file to addr ess QA issues as approved by New Jersey. The only QA issue identified was the inclusion of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in the inventory, which is not a valid pollutant code in NIF3.0, so these records were removed.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

9. New York

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New York reviewed the default NMIM inputs and provide d revisions to the input values for RVP and gasoline sulfur for all months. New York also requested revisions to weight percent oxygen

values for all counties and months. These wei ght percent values were then converted to a volume percent for use in NMIM, based on MTBE as the only oxygenate for all counties, with the exception of four counties. These included Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, and Niagara counties, which use ETOH as the oxygenate. Th e final fuel input data by county and by month

are summarized in Table B-1.

For the aircraft and locomotive categories, Pech an used emissions reported in the preliminary

2002 Nonroad NEI.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In October 2004, New York provided commercial ma rine vessel emissions to be added to their inventory. New York did not provide PM-2.5 commercial mari ne vessel emissions for some counties in their inventory. Pechan estimat ed the commercial marine vessel PM25-PRI emissions from PM10-PRI using the assumption that 92% of PM 10 is PM 2.5 (EPA, 2003b).91 b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) emissi ons for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not reported in the EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by applying a PM10-PRI/NO

x emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO

x emissions for this SCC.

Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

10. Pennsylvania

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Pennsylvania approved of the fuel inputs provided, which we re based on the onroad MOBILE6 inputs. Since these differed from the values in NMIM2005, Pe chan updated the NMIM profiles accordingly. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county a nd month. Pennsylvania provided one county allocation file for the lawn and garden category (42000hou.alo) to replace

the default file used in NMIM.

Pennsylvania submitted an aircraft, locomotive, and commercial marine vessel emissions inventory to MANE-VU after the CERR submittal date.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

In August 2005, Pennsylvania provided Pechan with county-level updates to SCC 2285002006 (Line Haul Locomotives: Class I Operations) emi ssions for all pollutants. Pechan updated all emission records for this SCC in Pennsylvania's inventory.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pennsylvania authorized Pechan to remove the CO 2 emission records from their inventory. In addition, the following data augmentation was perf ormed to add missing SCCs and pollutants. Pennsylvania did not provide commercial aircraft emissions in their inventory. Pechan added commercial aircraft emissions from the 2002 pr eliminary NEI to Pennsylvania’s inventory. Pennsylvania did not provide PM10-PRI and PM25- PRI aircraft emissions in their inventory. Pechan developed aircraft PM 10 emissions for all aircraft t ypes by applying an average PM 10 /

NO

x emission ratio to Pennsylva nia’s available aircraft NO

x emissions. The PM 10 /NO

x ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, m ilitary aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a partic le size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of

PM 10 is PM 2.5 (ERG, 2004).92 Pennsylvania also did not provide SO 2 general aviation and air taxi emissions in the inventory.

Pechan estimated the SO 2 emissions by applying a SO 2 /NO

x emission ratio to the general

aviation and air taxi NO

x emissions, using ratios of 0.154 and 0.095, respectively.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

11. Rhode Island

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan used NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Rhode Island approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B-1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. Rhode Isla nd provided a revised eq uipment population file (44000.pop) with updated populations for specific S CCs to replace the default file used in

NMIM.

Rhode Island provided emissions for aircraft , locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories for their nonroad sector CERR submittal.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State?

Rhode Island provided updates in September 2004 to their county-level railroad equipment

emissions. The new emissions fall under SCC 2285002005 and replace all line haul locomotive emissions provided in their CERR submittal. Emission estimates for yard locomotives were also provided (SCC 2285002010).

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved by

Rhode Island.

PM 10 was not identified as either primary or filte rable. Rhode Island authorized Pechan to change it to PM10-PRI. To avoid double c ounting, Pechan removed the following SCCs from Rhode Island’s inventory: 2275000000, 2280002000, 2280002020, 2280003000, and

2280003020. These emissions are accounted for unde r more specific SCCs for aircraft, and more aggregate SCCs for commercial marine.

Rhode Island did not provide PM10-PRI and PM 25-PRI aircraft emissions in their inventory. Pechan developed aircraft PM 10 emissions for all aircraft t ypes by applying an average PM 10 /

NO

x emission ratio to the aircraft NO

x emissions in their inventory. The PM 10 /NO

x ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, m ilitary aircraft, and air taxi PM25-PRI emissions by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a partic le size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For93 commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25-PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of

PM 10 is PM 2.5 (ERG, 2004).

Rhode Island did not provide yard locomotiv e, and commercial marine vessel PM25-PRI emissions in their inventory. Pechan estimated the yard locomotive PM25-PRI emissions from PM10-PRI using the assumption that 90% of PM 10 is PM25 (EPA, 2003b). Pechan estimated the

commercial marine vessel PM25-PRI emissions fr om PM10-PRI using the assumption that 92%

of PM 10 is PM 2.5 (EPA, 2003b).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

12. Vermont

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Pechan developed NONROAD model SCC emi ssions for Vermont using NMIM2005. Vermont approved of the default fuel input values us ed in NMIM2005 for weight percent oxygen, but requested that the RVP and gasolin e sulfur values reflect values used for onroad mobile source

emissions.

Pechan added aircraft emissions for Vermont from the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) emissi ons for PM10-PRI and PM25-PRI were not reported in the EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. Pechan estimated PM10-PRI emissions by applying an average PM10-PRI/NO

x emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO

x emissions.

Commercial aircraft PM25-PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10-PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

Note that there are no locomotive or commercial marine vessel emissions in the NEI for Vermont. Where activity for any of these SCCs occurs in Vermont, th ese categories are not represented in the State’s inventory.94 CHAPTER V

– ONROAD SOURCES

A. General Methods for All States

This section provides an overview of the data sources and QA steps used in preparing the 2002 onroad sector inventory for the MANE-VU Stat es and in preparing the corresponding modeling inputs for the MANE-VU Version 3 modeling invent ory. The onroad sector is comprised of all

motorized vehicles that travel on the public highways including passenger cars, light-duty trucks, minivans, sport utility vehicles, heavy-duty trucks , and buses. It should be noted that, unlike the other emission sectors, the modeling inventory inputs for the onroad sector do not include any emissions data. The primary modeling inputs for th e onroad sector instead are the activity inputs (vehicle miles traveled (V MT)) and SMOKE-formatted MOBILE6 input files. The SMOKE model then generates full MOBI LE6 input files using the MOBI LE6 inputs, speed inputs, and meteorological inputs for the episode(s) to be modeled, runs the MOBILE6 emission factor model to calculate the appropriate emission fact ors, and calculates emissions using the supplied VMT and additional temporal allocation factors for the VMT.

1. Data Sources

a. Source of default model data

The MANE-VU 2002 onroad emissions inventory was compiled from data supplied by the MANE-VU State agencies in the form of onroad emissions input data or emissions inventories either directly to MANE-VU or to EPA through their CERR submittal. States provided information in one or more of the following ways: (1) an onroad emission inventory submittal to EPA, (2) MOBILE6 inputs and VMT data in NMIM format to EPA, (3) portions of MOBILE6 inputs or full MOBILE6 input files and supporting files plus VMT to EPA, or (4) portions of MOBILE6 inputs or full MOBILE6 input files and supporting files plus VMT to MANE-VU. Different procedures were followed in developing the MANE-VU 2002 onroad emission inventory depending upon how the data were submitted.

As discussed above, the primary data needed in preparing the inputs for the onroad modeling

files were the VMT data and MO BILE6 input files. All of the MANE-VU States provided VMT data, which were incorporated in the SMOKE modeling. The leve l of detail of the supplied VMT data and any additional processing of the VM T data are discussed i ndividually by State, below, in Section B: State-Sp ecific Methods. Therefore, no de fault data were needed for the VMT inputs. Default model inputs for the SMOK E MOBILE6 input files were needed in some

cases. The source of default information to be included in these input files was the NMIM national county database, as this was also the default source of data for EPA in preparing the

2002 NEI. This database includes information on monthly fuel data by county, control program information by county, such as inspection and main tenance (I/M) program inputs, and other fleet information, such as vehicle regist ration distributions, that may have been supplied by the States. Additionally, vehicle speed information is needed in the SMOKE modeling files. Some States supplied this information. In cases where no speed data were supplied, the default speeds used by EPA in calculating the NEI were used. These speeds differ by road class group and by vehicle class group.95 For the SMOKE modeling, Pechan did not provide any ambient data such as temperature or humidity. Instead, the SMOKE model needs meteor ological input data sp ecific to the episode(s) being modeled. Thus, although the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files do include temperature data and in some cases humidity data, these inputs will be replaced by the SMOKE model with the appropriate episode-specific data.

b. Model inputs and revisions provided by States

The model inputs and revisions provided by the St ates are discussed in detail in Section B, below. These inputs include VMT data, VMT temporal data, vehicle speeds, I/M program inputs, registrations distributions , and other MOBILE6 input data.

c. Model inputs provided vs. model inputs used

Pechan prepared the followi ng model input files for Versi on 3 of the MANE-VU modeling inventory:

• MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt—c ontains VMT and speeds by county and SCC;

• MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt—contains VMT temporal profiles;

• MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt—c ontains cross references between temporal profiles and county/SCC;

• MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt—contains VMT vehicle mix fractions;

• MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt—contains cr oss reference between MANE-VU counties and the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files;

• MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt—cont ains general county-level information for SMOKE;

• MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt—contains hour ly speed profiles (SPDPRO);

• MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt—contains cross re ferences between speed profiles and MANE-VU county/SCC;

• MANEVU_2002_mcodes.txt—contains inform ation on SCCs used in MBINV file;

• MANEVU_SMOKE_M6Inputs_MA_NJ_02022006.zip—contains monthly SMOKEformatted MOBILE6 input files for Massachus etts and New Jersey, updated for Version 3;

• MANEVU_2002_SMOKE_M6_InputFiles0320 04.zip—contains monthly SMOKEformatted MOBILE6 input files for all MANE -VU States. Files for Massachusetts and New Jersey from this zip file should be re placed by the Version 3 files dated 02/02/2006.

• MANEVU_2002_SMOKE_M6_ExternalFiles.zip—cont ains external data files called by the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files.

2. What Quality Assurance Steps were Performed?

This section provides a brief summary of the QA st eps and processes that were performed in the development of the onroad sector modeling input s for MANE-VU. The initial QA procedures were performed on the emissions and input data used to calculate the MANE-VU 2002 onroad96 emission inventory. Some of these QA procedur es are also relevant here to the modeling inventory as many of the inputs are either the same or start with common information.

For States submitting onroad emission inventories to EPA, Pechan performed QA checks on the State-provided emission inventory da ta to ensure completeness, referential integrity, and correct formatting of the data. Where necessary as a re sult of these QA checks, and with the approval of the affected State, Pechan revise d the inventories to meet the nece ssary inventory standards. For the modeling inventory, the VMT checks included in these QA checks are relevant. Note that a Quality Assurance Plan was prepared prior to initiating work on Version 1 (MANE-VU, 2003). This plan was applied during development of all three versions of the MANE-VU inventory.

a. Data input summary spre adsheets for State review

In reviewing the data submitted for both the a nnual onroad inventory and the onroad modeling files, Pechan prepared a State QA report for each St ate. These reports were in the form of Excel spreadsheets. In each of the State QA reports , a page was included that summarized the modeling inputs. This included MOBILE6 input pa rameters, such as I/M data, registration data,

and fuel data. Columns were included indica ting the data file name, data coverage (e.g., statewide or for specific countie s), data source, any comments re garding the data , an indication of whether any guidance was requested from th e State agency before proceeding, and columns for State agency approval of the listed inputs. These reports were provided to each State agency and the State could either approve the inputs summa rized or provide an al ternate data source or

calculation method. For States th at had submitted emission inventor ies in NIF format, results of the NIF QA checks were also included in these St ate QA reports for the states to review and approve and provide alternate data or methods. This table also include information on the VMT data source and any proposed methodologi es needed for processing the VMT.

b. Responses from State Agencies

The appropriate State agency staff reviewed the State QA reports and provided direction for correcting QA issues either in the QA Summary Report Excel file or vi a e-mail. The modeling inputs were then revised to incor porate responses from the agencies.

3. Version 3 Emission Summaries

Table V-1 presents a summary of the annual 200 2 Version 3 MANE-VU onr oad sector pollutant emissions for each MANE-VU State, as well as a regional total. Diffe rences between these

Version 3 annual emission totals and the Vers ion 2 totals documented in the January 2005 MANE-VU mobile sources inventory report are the result of updated da ta provided by New Jersey and Massachusetts. Emissions for the rema ining states have not changed. It should be

noted that these emission results are from the annual inventory modeling. These will differ from the results obtained by the SMOKE onroad modeli ng. Additionally, the emissions in this table do not reflect VMT updates from Vermont that were provided after the Version 2 MANE-VU annual inventory had been calculated, but were included in the SMOKE Version 2 and Version 3 modeling inputs.97 Table V-1. Annual 2002 Onroad Sect or Emissions by MANE-VU State (Tons/Year)

State VOC NO x CO SO 2 PM10-PRI PM25-PRI NH 3
Connecticut 31,755.3 68,816.2 562, 124.0 1,666.9 1,580. 0 1,041.6 3,293.9

Delaware 10,563.8 21,340.5 160,760.4 583.9 581.1 414.9 902.8

District of Columbia 4,895.3 8, 902.0 66,017.6 271. 1 222.0 153.0 397.8

Maine 23,037.4 54,686.8 410,9 57.8 1,803.9 1,239. 1 934.4 1,467.5

Maryland 61,846.7 122,210.0 1,000, 762.8 4,057.6 3,168. 3 2,200.4 5,594.3

Massachusetts 57,185.5 143,367.6 1, 039,100.1 4,398.8 3, 407.5 2,409.9 5,499.1

New Hampshire 16,762.3 33,283. 0 306,792.5 776.9 814.3 561.8 1,447.0

New Jersey 89,752.9 152,076.1 1,273, 513.1 3,648.6 3,725. 3 2,469.0 7,382.0

New York 287,845.2 319,7 32.5 3,711,149.6 10,639.5 8 ,457.5 5,897. 7 14,680.9

Pennsylvania 176,090.3 346, 471.5 2,784,196.5 10,924. 1 7,351.5 5,331. 2 10,532.3

Rhode Island 12,537.8 16,677. 2 186,196.8 425.3 345.1 210.5 852.6

Vermont 17,287.8 20,669.9 248,247.6 893.8 669.6 482.8 934.1

Total MANE-VU 789,560.3 1, 308,233.3 11,749,818. 8 40,090.5 31,561.3 22,107.2 52,984.3

B. State-Specific Methods

The following sections describe what modeling inputs were used for each State and how these inputs were developed.

1. Connecticut

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-2 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input file s that were prepared containing information

for the State of Connecticut. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

The VMT inputs provided by Connecticut were in the form of three sets of data. This included a file with VMT by county and four road types (Expressway, Arterial/C ollector, Local, and Ramp), a set of Statewide VMT mixes at the 16 vehicle type-level fo r each of the four Connecticut road types, and a Statewide hourly VMT distribution file. Additional data provided by Connecticut showing the correspondence between the four Connecticut road types and the 12 Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) ro ad types were used to first distribute the county VMT to the 12 road types. Average da ily miles were converted to annual miles by multiplying the average daily miles by 365. Pech an then developed a simple MOBILE6 input file that used the Connecticut registration distribu tion and with a separate scenario for each of the VMT mixes provided at the 16 vehi cle type level. Pechan used the resulting MOBILE6 output file to extract the 28 vehicle ty pe VMT mix corresponding to each of the four Connecticut road types. The VMT data by county and 12 road type s were then multiplied by the 28 vehicle type

VMT fractions to obtain a VMT file at the 28 vehi cle type level and 12 road type level by county (for use in calculating the annual emission inve ntory). VMT from these 28 vehicle types were98 then aggregated to the 12 ve hicle types needed for the SMOK E MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by vehicle type for each county and road type were also calcul ated for inclusion in

the SMOKE VMTMIX file.

Table V-2. Connecticut Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC CT Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle

groups Default

NEI Speed profiles MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt and MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt County/hour/road type CT

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide/road type CT

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

For Connecticut, speed information is contained in both the MBINV SMOKE file as well as in the SMOKE speed profile (SPDPRO) and speed cro ss reference file (SPDREF) files. The speed information contained in the MBINV file is simply the default NEI speed data. The actual speed data to be used in the modeling inventory fo r Connecticut are contained in the SMOKE SPDPRO and SPDREF. The speed data from these tw o files should overwrite the default speed

information contained in the MBINV file dur ing the SMOKE modeling. The data used to develop the speed profiles were provided by Connecticut in the fo rm of NMIM speed input files

with the fraction of VMT occurr ing within each of 14 speed bins. These speed distributions differ by hour of day and by freeways versus arterial s and collectors. Separate speed distribution files were provided by Connecticut for each county. Pechan then converted these speed data into the speed profile format needed for SMOKE —hourly average speeds by county and the two specified road types.

Connecticut provided the followi ng data that were incorporat ed into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• Statewide registration distribution;

• Hourly VMT distributions;

• Statewide I/M program inputs and Anaer obic Thermal Processor (ATP); and

• RVP and fuel program data.

The data submitted by Connecticut indicated that Federal Northern reformulated gasoline is in place in the State, with an ozone season RVP of 6.8 pounds per square inch (psi). Based on the NMIM modeling that was performed for the an nual emission inventory, the reformulated gasoline program was modeled in the SMOKE MOBILE6 input file s using the combination of the FUEL PROGRAM: 4 command (indicating user-supplied gasoline sulfur inputs), RVP command, and the OXYGENATED FUELS comma nd. The monthly oxygenated fuel and gasoline sulfur inputs, and th e non-ozone season monthly RVP va lues were obtained from the99 NMIM national county database for Connecticut . During the ozone season months, the RVP value submitted by Connecticut of 6.8 psi was modeled. The fuel data obtained from NMIM are

the same for all counties in Conn ecticut, except Fairfield, which s hows different fuel properties, but all represent reformulated gasoline. Thes e values for both Fairfield and the remaining counties differed by season (i.e., the ozone seas on from May through September, transition months of March, April, Octobe r, and November, and the winter months of December, January, and February). Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 367 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 353 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months.

Data provided by Connecticut indicated that th e State follows the OTC low emission vehicle (LEV) program vehicle implementation schedul e. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followe d by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Connecticut.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

2. Delaware

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-3 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input file s that were prepared containing information

for the State of Delaware. This table notes the le vel of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

Delaware provided VMT data in the form of th e NEI NIF PE table as well as in the NMIM BaseYearVMT table format. Additionally, Delaware provided monthly VMT fractions developed from VMT counts on a va riety of road types. These monthly VMT fractions were provided for each of the Delaware counties. Since the data in the NEI NIF PE table were at the level of detail needed for the SMOKE MBINV file, the format of the VMT data was simply

converted from the NIF format to the SMOKE MBINV format. Similarly, the monthly VMT fractions were converted to the profile format needed in the SMOKE MTPRO file, with the appropriate cross references in the MTREF file . The average speeds provided by Delaware at the county/road type level were in cluded in the SMOKE MBINV file.100 Table V-3. Delaware Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC DE Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type DE VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by county/road type DE

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

The fuel data submitted by Delaware was based on the NMIM defaults with the NMIM October data replaced by the NMIM November data. The reformulated gas fuel parameters were modeled in the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files by using the combination of the OXYGENATED FUELS, FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoli ne sulfur contents) commands for each

month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 300 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 280 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 290 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months.

Data provided by Delaware indicated that th e State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OT C-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Delaware.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

3. District of Columbia

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-4 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input file s that were prepared containing information

for the District of Columbia. This table notes th e level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.101 Table V-4. District of Columbia Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC DC Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type DC VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Road type DC

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

The District of Columbia pr ovided 2002 VMT data in the form of the NMIM BaseYearVMT

table. This table included VMT at the 28 vehicle type level for each of the six urban road types

in the District of Columbia. VMT from these 28 vehicle types were then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by vehicle type for each county and road type were also calculated for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. The District also provided a spreadshee t including the daily aver age weighted speed by roadway class. These speeds were incorporated in the SMOKE MBINV file. The District of Columbia provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• District-wide regist ration distribution;

• I/M program and ATP inputs; and

• Weekday trip length distribution file.

The District of Columbia specifi ed that the NMIM fuel program default data for the District should be used for the MANE-VU modeling. This included reformulated ga soline district wide, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRA M (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands

for each month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 329 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 324 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 326 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months.

Data provided by the District of Columbia indi cated that the District follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followe d by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for the District of Columbia.102 c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for the District of Columbia should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully model reformulated ga soline in the District of Columbia. This command was inadvertently left out of the SMOKE MOBILE6 files.

4. Maine

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-5 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input file s that were prepared containing information

for the State of Maine. This table notes the leve l of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

Table V-5. Maine Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC ME Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type ME VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide/road type Default

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

Maine provided 2002 average daily VMT by c ounty and 12 roadway types. Maine had no

information available on the distribution of VM T among vehicle types. Therefore, Pechan developed the VMT by county, roadway type, and vehicle type by using the default MOBILE6 2002 VMT mix by vehicle type. These VMT da ta were converted to annual VMT by multiplying the average daily VMT by 365. Th e MOBILE6 VMT default mix fractions by vehicle type for 2002 were included for Maine in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Maine also provided average speed data by c ounty and roadway type. These data were included in the

SMOKE MBINV file.

Maine provided the following data that were incorporat ed into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• I/M program inputs and ATP inputs for Cumberland County only; and

• Monthly average RVP data.

Statewide diesel sulfur values were obtained from the NMIM defaults for Maine. A diesel sulfur value of 390 ppm sulfur was modeled in the summer months (June, July, and August), 338 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 364 ppm sulfur in the spring

and fall months.103 Data provided by Maine indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OT C-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Maine.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

5. Maryland

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-6 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input file s that were prepared containing information for the State of Maryland. This table notes the le vel of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

Maryland submitted annual VMT data in the form of a NIF tblMobilePE table. This included VMT by county, 12 vehicle types, and 12 road types. These VMT data were then converted to

the format needed for the SMOKE MBINV file. Pechan calculated VMT mix fractions from the VMT data supplied by Maryland to obtain the VMT mixes by county and road type contained in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. In addition, Maryla nd provided monthly VM T distribution data by road type. Pechan converted these data to the format needed for the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. The same set of monthly tempor al profiles were applied to all counties in Maryland. Maryland also provide d a spreadsheet show ing the average speed Statewide for each of the 12 roadway types. These speed data were included in the SMOKE MBINV file.

Maryland provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• County-specific regist ration distribution;

• County-specific dies el sales fractions;

• I/M program inputs and ATP inputs to be applied in the 14 I/M counties; and

• Statewide monthly diesel sulfur content data.

Maryland indicated that the NMIM default fuel parameters for Maryland should be used in the MANE-VU modeling. This fuel da ta includes reformulated ga soline in 14 of the Maryland counties. The reformulated gasoline program was modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) co mmands for each month. Maryland provided monthly Statewide diesel sulfur values. Thes e values ranged from 455 ppm sulfur to 500 ppm104 sulfur. These values were included in the corresponding monthly SMOKE MOBILE6 input

files.

Table V-6. Maryland Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC MD Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type MD VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type MD Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Statewide monthly by road type MD

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

Data provided by Maryland indicated that the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OT C-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Maryland affecting the modeling inventory files.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for Maryland should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully model reformulated gasoline in the Maryland counties that implement the reformulated gasoline program. This command was inadvertently left out of the Maryland

SMOKE MOBILE6 files.105 6. Massachusetts

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-7 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input file s that were prepared containing information

for the State of Massachusetts. Th is table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

Table V-7. Massachusetts Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC MA Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type MA VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type Default Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by county MA

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

The Version 3 MANE-VU onroad modeling for Massachusetts differed from the Version 2 modeling, based on updates provided by Massachusetts in December 2005. The primary changes for Massachusetts from Version 3 is the use of updated 2002 VMT data and vehicle speed date. Massachusetts provided a spreadsh eet containing revised VM T values and vehicle speeds for 2002 by county and SCC. Pechan prep ared the revised Massachusetts VMT data and the speed data in the format of the SMOKE MB INV file. Using the revised VMT data by SCC, Pechan calculated the updated VMT mixes by vehicl e type for each county and road type in

Massachusetts and formatted the resulting data to be included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file.

The original VMT data submitted by Massachusetts included VMT for each of the four seasons. Pechan used these data to develop monthl y VMT temporal profiles. Seasonal VMT was assigned to the months in that season based on the ratio of the number of days in a specific month to the number of days in the season. Pechan then form atted the monthly temporal VMT

allocation factors for inclusion in the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files.106 Massachusetts provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• Statewide registration distribution;

• Statewide I/M program inputs and ATP inputs;

• RVP and fuel program data;

• Diesel sulfur content of 350 ppm su lfur year-round and statewide; and

• Massachusetts-specific LEV and Tier 2 implementation files.

Northern reformulated gasoline was modeled stat ewide throughout the Stat e, with a RVP value of 6.7 psi during the ozone season and 13.5 psi during the remaining months, based on inputs provided by Massachusetts. The section below on QA issues for Massachusetts discusses the fuel inputs modeled in the Version 3 SMOKE MOBILE6 input files in more detail. Massachusetts provided the necessary inputs to model the State’s LEV implementation schedule and Tier 2 data, which differ from the OTC-LEV program and from the default MOBILE6 Tier 2

data.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

In addition to the VMT updates, Pechan re vised the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files for

Massachusetts for Version 3. This was done because Version 2 of the MANE-VU modeling inventory was prepared using the default setti ng of MOBILE6 to model reformulated gasoline (i.e., using the command line “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”). Since the time that the Version 2 inventory was created, EPA found a bug with the su lfur content values used when the default reformulated gasoline command is used. To el iminate this problem, Pechan created revised SMOKE MOBILE6 input files for Massachusetts that model reformulated gasoline by explicitly setting the RVP, gasoline sulfur contents, a nd gasoline oxygen contents. The gasoline sulfur contents and gasoline oxygen contents were set a ccording to the default parameters laid out in the MOBILE6 user’s guide. The summer (May through September) sulfur content is 129 ppm in

2002 and the winter sulfur c ontent is 279 ppm in 2002. The summer gasoline contains 2.1 percent oxygen, with MTBE as the oxygenate. The winter gasoline contains 1.5 percent oxygen in 70 percent of the fuel having MTBE as the oxygenate, and 3.5 percent oxygen in 30 percent of the fuel having ETOH as the oxygenate. The RVP values were not changed from those modeled in Version 2 (6.7 psi in the summer and 13.5 psi in the winter).

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

7. New Hampshire

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-8 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input file s that were prepared containing information for the State of New Hampshire. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original informa tion used to create these data files.107 Table V-8. New Hampshire Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NH Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type NH VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide NH

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

The VMT inputs provided by New Hampshire were in the form of summer day VMT by county or nonattainment area and roadway type. In addition, New Hampshire provided a Statewide VMT mix distribution by 16 vehicl e types in the MOBILE6 files pr ovided by the State. Pechan then developed a simple MOBILE6 input file that used the New Hampshire Statewide registration distribution and the Statewide VMT mix by vehicle type. Pechan used the resulting MOBILE6 output file to extract the 28 vehicle type VMT mix to be applied Statewide to the county/roadway type VMT data. Summer day m iles were converted to annual miles by using national data from the Federal Highway Administ ration’s Travel Volume Trends which provides 2002 monthly VMT for groups of road categories. Additionally, the VMT data from the three New Hampshire nonattainment areas represented four counties. To allocate these VMT by county, Pechan first totaled the VMT data from th ese three nonattainment areas by roadway type. Then, using ratios developed from the prel iminary 2002 NEI VMT, Pechan allocated the grouped VMT by county and roadway type. W ith VMT for the entire State at the county/roadway type level of detail, Pechan then multiplied the VMT data by the 28 vehicle type

VMT fractions to obtain a VMT file at the 28 ve hicle type level and 12 roadway type level by county for use in preparing the annual onroad emission inventory. VMT from these 28 vehicle types were then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by vehicle type for each c ounty and road type were also calculated for

inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. New Ha mpshire also provided a spreadsheet including the average speed by roadway class for each c ounty or county group. These speeds were incorporated in the SMOKE MBINV file.

New Hampshire provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• Statewide registrati on distribution; and

• Statewide ATP inputs.

New Hampshire specified that the NMIM fuel program default data for New Hampshire should be used for the MANE-VU modeling. This incl uded reformulated gasoline in four counties, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRA M (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands

for each month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 400 ppm sulfur in the108 summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 370 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months.

Data provided by New Hampshire indicated th at the State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefor e, the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation

schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model

year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Through the State QA report process, New Ha mpshire provided updated inputs for VMT and speeds that were incorporated in the modeling inventory inputs.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for the four New Hamp shire that implement reformulated gasoline

should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully model the benefits reformulated gasoline. This command was inadvertently left out of the SM OKE MOBILE6 files.

8. New Jersey

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-9 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input file s that were prepared containing information for the State of New Jersey. This table notes the le vel of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

Table V-9. New Jersey Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NJ Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle

groups Default

NEI VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type NJ Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by 3 county groups and weekday/weekend NJ

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

Updates were made to the Version 2 MOBILE6 SMOKE inputs for New Jersey in December 2005 to create Version 3, based on revised data pr ovided by the State. New Jersey provided the following files:109 • a set of SMOKE MOBILE6 input files by county and month;

• NJ_2002_mbinv.txt file that contained revised VMT and speeds by county and SCC, generated by NJDEP in August 2005, in SMOKE format;

• amptref.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805_NJVMT.txt —a SMOKE-formatted file containing county/SCC-level temporal profile cross-references;

• amptro.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805_NJVMT.txt—a SMOKE-formatted file containing county-specific VMT temporal profiles prepared by NJDEP in August 2005; and

• zip files containing external files needed to run the SMOKE MOBILE6 files.

After an initial review of these files, Pech an did not note any diffe rences in the SMOKE

MOBILE6 files from the Version 2 files. Pechan then confirmed with New Jersey that the only changes from the Version 2 date were in the VMT data. The VMT and speed data by county and SCC in the MBINV file provided by New Je rsey were copied to the MANE-VU SMOKE MBINV file, replacing the VMT and speed data from the Version 2 SMOKE MBINV file for New Jersey. The speed data included by New Jers ey are the default NEI speeds by road type and vehicle type. Using the new VMT data provided by New Jersey, P echan calculated a revised set of VMT mix fractions by vehicle type and in cluded these in the Ve rsion 3 SMOKE VMTMIX file. Pechan pasted the temporal profiles pr ovided for New Jersey into the SMOKE MTPRO file. This included monthly temporal profiles and diurnal temporal profiles. The diurnal temporal profiles were applied to both weekdays and weekends. Similarly the temporal cross reference data included in the file provided by New Jersey was pasted into the SMOKE MTREF

file for MANE-VU Version 3.

The following New Jersey-provided were included in the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• Statewide registration distribution;

• Statewide diesel sales fractions;

• Statewide I/M program and ATP inputs; and

• Diesel sulfur content da ta (340 ppm statewide).

Northern reformulated gasoline was modeled stat ewide throughout the State, using NMIM fuel program input defaults for New Jersey. The section below on QA issues for New Jersey discusses the fuel inputs modeled in the Version 3 SMOKE MOBILE6 input file s in more detail.

Data provided by New Jersey indicated that th e State follows the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OT C-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

As discussed above for New Jersey, the Vers ion 2 New Jersey SMOKE MOBILE6 input files modeled reformulated gasoline using the command lin e “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”, which is the default method for modeling reformulated gaso line with MOBILE6. To eliminate the effects110 of the MOBILE6 reformulated gasoline bug from the SMOKE MOBILE6 inputs, Pechan explicitly modeled the reformul ated gasoline program in the Ne w Jersey MOBILE6 input files by explicitly modeling th e appropriate settings of the RV P, oxygenated fuel content commands, and gasoline sulfur commands. The values fo r oxygenated fuel settings and gasoline sulfur contents by month were extracted from the NMIM county-level database used in developing the annual emissions inventory for the MANE- VU Version 2 onroad emissions inventory.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

9. New York

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-10 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing

information for the State of New York. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original informa tion used to create these data files.

Table V-10. New York Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC NY Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle

groups Default

NEI Speed profiles MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt and MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt County/hour/road type NY

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type NY Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by 3 county

groups NY

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

VMT for New York was provided in the form of a NIF PE table. These VMT data were

extracted and included in the SMOKE MBINV file . VMT mix fractions by vehicle type were

calculated from these VMT data and included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file.

New York provided a spreadsheet with average speeds in each of four daily time periods by county and road type. Pechan converted th ese speed data to th e SMOKE SPDPRO format, assigning the speed for a given time period to all hours included in that time period. Pechan also prepared the SMOKE SPDREF file to appropriately cross reference each county and road type to the corresponding hourly speed profile. Because these more detailed speed files were provided for New York, the average speed by road type an d county in the MBINV file was populated with default NEI speeds.111 New York also provided spreadsheets showi ng monthly VMT by county and roadtype. After processing these VMT values to develop monthly temporal factors, Pechan observed that there were only three unique mont hly profiles in this data set. These three profiles were then added to

the SMOKE MTPRO file. Pechan then matched each county and road type in the State to the corresponding monthly VMT profile in the SMOKE MTREF file.

New York provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• Registration distributions—one for the Ne w York metropolitan area and one for the rest of the State;

• Diesel sales fractions—one for the New Yo rk metropolitan area and one for the rest of the State;

• Statewide mileage accumulation rate input;

• Monthly RVP data—one set for the New York metropolitan area and one for the rest of the State;

• Reformulated gasoline program inputs for affected counties modeled with MOBILE6 defaults (i.e., “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”);

• I/M program inputs for affected counties;

• Statewide ATP inputs;

• Hourly VMT distributions by county group;

• Start distributions by county;

• Diesel sulfur content da ta (400 ppm statewide).

New York also provided the necessary input files to model the State’s LEV program implementation schedule, which differs from th e OTC LEV program. New York also provided MOBILE6 Tier 2 modeling files to be used al ong with the New York LEV program inputs. These inputs were included in the SMOKE MOBILE6 modeling.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for New York affecting the modeling inventory files.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

10. Pennsylvania

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-11 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Pennsylvania. This ta ble notes the level of deta il of the data included as well as the source of the original info rmation used to create these data files.112 Table V-11. Pennsylvania Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC PA Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road type PA VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type PA Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by county PA

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

Pennsylvania provided a database file (NEIANN02.dbf) that contai ned the VMT and speed data by county, roadway type, and vehicle type. This included the same VMT used in the calculation of the annual onroad inventory submitted by Penn sylvania for MANE-VU. Pechan converted

the data from this database file into VMT a nd speed data in the format of the SMOKE MBINV file. From the VMT data, Pechan calculated VM T fractions by vehicle type by county and road type for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Pennsylvania also provided estimates of VMT by month for each county. Pechan converted thes e data to monthly allocation factors in the format needed by the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. A separate monthly profile was developed for each county, but applied to all road types within that county.

Pennsylvania provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• Registration distributions for each individual county;

• I/M program and ATP inputs for affected Philadelphia and Pittsburgh area counties (inputs differ for the two areas);

• Monthly RVP data for all counties in cluding 7.8 psi RVP program from May through September for Pittsburgh counties;

• Reformulated gasoline for the 5-county Philadelphia area modeled with MOBILE6 defaults (i.e., “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”); and

• Diesel sulfur content da ta (500 ppm statewide).

Data provided by Pennsylvania i ndicated that the State follow s the OTC-LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OT C-LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.113 b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Pennsylvani a affecting the modeling inventory files.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.

11. Rhode Island

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-12 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing

information for the State of Rhode Island. This tabl e notes the level of deta il of the data included as well as the source of the original info rmation used to create these data files.

Table V-12. Rhode Island Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC RI Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County group/road type RI

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide RI

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

Rhode Island provided a spreadsheet with the 2002 VMT as well as Statewide 2002 VMT fractions by 16 vehicle types. Pechan prepared a simple MOBILE6 input file including this Rhode Island 2002 VMT mix by vehicle type and the 2002 Rhode Is land registration distribution. The VMT mix in the MOBILE6 output file at the 28 vehicl e type level was then used to distribute the VMT by vehicle category. The 2002 daily VMT was at the State level, broken down by the 12 roadway types. To allocate these VMT data to the county/road type level of detail, Pechan summed the VMT from the preliminary version of EPA’s 2002 NEI for Rhode Island first by State and roadway type and then by county and roadway type. Pechan calculated county/roadway type VMT fractions by dividing the VMT at the county/roadway type level by the State/roadway type VMT for the same roadway type. These fractions were then multiplied by the VMT supplied by Rhode Island at the Stat e/roadway type level of detail to obtain county/roadway type VMT data. These county/roadway type VMT data were then multiplied by the 28 vehicle type VMT fractions to obtain VMT at the level of detail needed to populate the NMIM BaseYearVMT table for calculating the a nnual inventory and were then summed to the 16-vehicle type level of detail for use in the SM OKE MBINV file. The data were also converted from daily VMT to annual by multiplying the average daily VMT by 365. VMT mix fractions114 from this final data set were then formatted in the SMOKE VMTMIX format at the State level of detail. Statewide speeds by road type, as provided by Rhode Island, were included in the

SMOKE MBINV file.

Rhode Island provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• Statewide registrati on distribution; and

• Statewide I/M program inputs.

Data for fuel parameters were obtained from the NMIM national county database for Rhode

Island. This included reformul ated gasoline Statewide, mode led using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline su lfur contents) commands for each month. These values differed by season, but were consistent Statewide. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 400 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and Februa ry), and 370 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall

months.

The NMIM default LEV program for Rhode Isla nd was modeled, which includes the OTC-LEV program LEV implementation schedule.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

No QA issues were identified for Rhode Island.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

The Rhode Island SMOKE MOBILE6 input f iles did not include the OXYGENATED FUELS command. This should have been used to fully characterize the parameters of reformulated gasoline that is used Stat ewide in Rhode Island.

12. Vermont

a. What Data Sources Were Used?

Table V-13 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing

information for the State of Vermont. This table not es the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original informa tion used to create these data files.115 Table V-13. Vermont Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files

Final MANE-VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail Data
Source VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/SCC VT Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/vehicle group (light-duty vs. heavy-duty) VT

VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road type VT Temporal profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly statewide

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County

SMOKE
MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County

Vermont submitted VMT data in the format of the NIF PE table. Vermont then provided updated VMT data for three road classifications (rural minor colle ctors, rural local roads, and urban local roads) in December 2004, after the time that these changes could be included in the

MANE-VU annual onroad emission i nventory. However, the update d VMT were included in the MANE-VU Version 3 onroad SMOKE modeling f iles. This VMT change resulted in a

Statewide decrease in VMT from about 9.5 billion miles to about 7.8 billion miles. As a result, the SMOKE modeling performed by MANE-VU will not match the MANE-VU emission inventory for Vermont. The VMT data were co nverted to the SMOKE MBINV file format.

VMT mix fractions were calculated from the VMT data and included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Vermont also provided information on the te mporal allocation of VMT. From these data, Pechan prepared a monthly VMT profile for Vermont and included the data in the SMOKE

MTPRO and MTREF files.

Vermont provided information on Statewide speeds by roadway type. These speeds differed for light-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles. Pechan incorporated this speed information into the

SMOKE MBINV file.

Vermont provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

• Statewide registration distribution;

• Statewide I/M program inputs; and

• RVP data.

The RVP data provided by Vermont were based on data from a local gasoline tank farm and resulted in an RVP value of 8.5 psi during th e ozone season months (May through September) and 9.47 psi for the remaining months. Data for fu el parameters other than RVP (e.g., diesel and gasoline fuel sulfur content) were obtained from the NMIM national county database for Vermont. These values differed by season, but were consistent Statewide. Statewide diesel116 sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 300 ppm su lfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 290 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 295 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months.

The NMIM default LEV program for Vermont wa s modeled, which includes Vermont’s Statespecific LEV implementation schedule.

b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?

Through the State QA report process, Vermont pr ovided a missing registration data file, RVP

data and revised VMT.

c. What Issues Need to be A ddressed in Future Versions?

None identified by the State.117 CHAPTER VI

– BIOGENIC SOURCES

A. General Methods for all States

1. What Data Sources Were Used?

Biogenic emissions for the time period from January 1, 2002 – December 31, 2002 were calculated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) for all of the MANE-VU states using the Biogenic Em issions Inventory System (BEIS) version 3.12 integrated within SMOKE2.1. The inventory was pr epared at the state-level for CO, nitrous oxide (NO), and VOC.

General information about BEIS is availabl e at http://www.epa.gov/AMD/biogen.html while documentation about biogenic emissions pr ocessing within SMOKE2.1 is available at http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/products/s moke/version2.1/html/ch06s10.html and http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/pr oducts/smoke/version2.1/html/c h06s17.html. Note that the SMOKE documentation refers to BEIS3.09 and has not yet been updated for BEIS3.12. This affects the number of species modeled as well as the use of different speciation profiles. However, the general processing approach ha s not changed from BEIS3.09 to BEIS3.12. In short, this processing approach is as follows and was utilized by NYSDEC for its biogenic emission processing for MANE -VU and the OTC modeling:

• Normbeis3 reads gridded land use data and em issions factors and produces gridded normalized biogenic emissions for 34 speci es/compounds. The gridded land use file utilized by NYSDEC includes the fractional co verage of 230 different land use types for each of the 172 * 172 12-km grid cells in the MANE-VU/OTC modeling domain. In a separate BEIS3.12 input file, both summ er and winter emissions factors for each species/compound are provided for each of the 230 land use types. On output,

Normbeis3 generates a file B3GRD which contains gridded summer and winter emission fluxes for the modeling domain that are normalized to 30 °C and a photosynthetic active radiat ion (PAR) of 1000 μmol/m 2 s. In addition, gridded

summer and winter leaf area indi ces (LAI) are al so written to B3GRD

.

• Tmpbeis3 reads the gridded, normalized emissi ons file B3GRD and meteorological data from the MCIP-processed MM5 mete orological fields generated by the University of Maryland for MANE-VU/OT C modeling. Specifically, the following MM5/MCIP meteorological variables are used by Tmpbeis3 to compute hourspecific, gridded biogenic emissions from the normalized emission fluxed contained in B3GRD: layer-1 air temperature (“TA ”), layer-1 pressure (“PRES”), total incoming solar radiation at the surface (“RGRND”), and convective (“RC”) and nonconvective (“RN”) rainfall. Addi tionally, the emissions for the 34 species/compounds modeled by BEIS3.12 are co nverted to CO, NO, and the CB-IV VOC species utilized in CMAQ via th e use of the BEIS3.12-CB-IV speciation profile. Furthermore, an external file, BIOSEASON, was utilized to decide whether

to use summer or winter emissions factor s for any given grid cell on any given day. This file was generated by the SMOKE2.1 utility Metscan based on MM5 layer-1 air118 temperatures to determine the date of the last spring frost and first fall frost at each grid cell. Summer emission factors are used by Tmpbeis3 for the time period between the day of the last spring frost and the day of the first fall frost at any given grid cell, and winter emission factors are used for the remaining time period.

Documentation for the Metscan utility is available at http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/ products/smoke/version2.1/html/ch05s07.html. An animated GIF file showing the BIOSEASON file used by NYSDEC can be found at ftp://ftp.dec.state.ny.us/dar/ air_research/chogrefe/biog_reports/b3season_movie.gif.

• For reporting purposes, the hourly, speciated, gridded emissions were aggregated to the county level for each day. For any give n grid cell, emissions were distributed among the counties intersecting th is grid cell in proportion to the area of each of these counties within the grid cell. The ar ea gridding surrogates needed for this aggregation are based on a file obtai ned from EPA via http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ chief/emch/spatial/new/bgpro.2km_041604.us.gz, followed by windowing for the MANE-VU/OTC modeling domain.

2. Version 3 Emissions Summary

Table VI-1 presents a State-leve l summary of the annual biogenic source emissions in Version 3 of the 2002 MANE-VU inventory. The annual emissions are based on the sum of the daily emissions prepared using the modeling approach previously discussed.

Table VI-1. Version 3 2002 MANE-VU Biogenic Source Emissions by State (Tons/Year)

State CO NO VOC*
Connecticut 6,889 560 64,017
Delaware 4,274 990 46,343 District of Columbia 150 30 1,726
Maine 64,936 2,018 600,205 Maryland 18,351 2,934 210,104 Massachusetts 11,594 1,257 113,958 New Hampshire 14,306 482 141,894 New Jersey 14,058 1,813 181,617
New York 63,436 8,313 492,487 Pennsylvania 59,946 8,646 585,272 Rhode Island 1,764 211 19,233
Vermont 14,745 1,142 118,377
MANE-VU 274,451 28,396 2,575,232 * VOC emissions were calculated by adding the emissions for the following pollutants: ALD2, ETH, FORM, ISOP, NR, OLE, PAR, TERB, TOL, XYL.

B. State-Specific Methods

No state-specific methods were used in Vers ion 3 of the MANE-VU inventory for biogenic

emissions.119 CHAPTER VII. TEMPORAL, SPECIA TION, AND SPATIAL ALLOCATION PROFILES AND PREPARATION OF SMOKE (IDA) AND RPO DATA EXCHANGE PROTOCOL (NIF 3.0) FORMATS

Table VII-1 provides a su mmary of the file names and documentation used for modeling inputs for Version 3 of MANE-VU’s 2002 inventory for point, area, nonroad, and onroad sources. The final input files used for tempor al allocation, speciation, and spatia l allocation of emissions were developed for Version 1 of the 2002 inventory and delivered to MARAMA during January 2005 (MANE-VU, 2005). These files were developed starting with the late st model input files

available from EPA and then re vised to include updates needed for the MANE-VU region or to add SCCs and profile assignments not included in the initial EPA data sets. The files were revised between September 2004 and January 20 05 to incorporate comments provided by MANE-VU. Files in Table VII-1 with a date that is later than January 2005 were prepared to support modeling for Version 3. The notes column in the table identifies the modifications made to the files if the files were changed after this date. Otherwise, files with a date later than January 2005 were either provided by a state ag ency or were obtained from EPA and used for modeling Version 3.

The remainder of this chapter provides a brief su mmary of the revisions made to the EPA data sets prepared for Version 1 of the 2002 MANE- VU inventory and subsequently carried for the modeling for Version 3. Sections A, B, and C of this chapter disc uss how the temporal allocation, speciation, and spatial a llocation profiles, respectively, were developed. Section D of this chapter describes how the emissions inventor y data were prepared in the SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) Formats.

A. Temporal Profiles

1. Point and Area Sources

The most recent SMOKE temporal cross-referen ce files available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for develo ping the cross-reference f iles for point and area sources. The following 3 classes of modifications were completed to improve the temporal allocation input files:

• Update temporal cross-reference to assign an existing profile in the default SMOKE

profiles for SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory

• Create a new temporal cross-reference to an existing profile in the default SMOKE

profiles for SCCs in the MANE-VU inventory; the cross-reference did not previously exist in the default SMOKE files but the profile did exist.

• Create new temporal profiles and cross -references for SCCs in the MANE-VU

inventory; neither the cross-referenc e nor profiles for the MANE-VU SCCs previously existed in the default SMOKE files.120 a. Point Sources

A total of 30 point SCCs existed in the MANE-V U point source inventory that were not in the point source cross-reference file; therefore, the SCCs were added to the cross-reference file and assigned to existing profiles based on the assignment of similar SCCs already assigned to the profiles. Table II-2 lists the SCCs along with the state and count y FIPS where they occurred in the MANE-VU inventory. Temporal profiles could not be identified for the SCCs listed in Table VII-3 due to either the SCC being shorter than 8-digits or the lack of information about the source categories for identifying an appropriate profile assignment. These SCCs were assigned the default profile by SMOKE.

b. Area Sources

For area sources, the improvements to the EPA cro ss-reference file includ ed updates to existing profiles in the file based on MANE-VU-specific da ta (see Table VII-4), addition of SCCs that were assigned to existing profiles based on the assignment of similar SCCs already assigned to the profiles (see Table VII-5), and addition of new SCCs and profiles based on MANE-VU- or RPO-specific data (see Table VII-6).

Additional cross-referencing information used to revise the temporal cross-reference file included MANE-VU county-leve l information for resident ial wood combustion, monthly temporal profiles developed for NH 3 source categories using the Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) model, and a Delaware-specific cross-re ference file associated with the Delaware inventory. The additions of ne w SCCs and new profiles shown in Table VII-6 mostly apply to the state of Delaware (State FIPS=10). For the FIPS column, the “-9” designation means the cross-reference is applied for a ll counties that do not have a c ounty or state-specific SCC crossreference record. These changes to the temporal cross-reference file allowed for the assignment of a non-flat temporal profile (262= uniform monthly, 7=uniform weekly and 24=uniform diurnal) to 95% of the SCCs in the area inventory.

2. Nonroad Sources

Nonroad sources used the same temporal profil e and cross-reference files as area sources.

3. Onroad Sources

For onroad sources, the following States provided their own data to update the default temporal profile files and the temporal cross referen ce files: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont. Each of these States provided VMT information that could be used to develop monthly temporal profiles. The data were provided in a variety of formats, ra nging from monthly or s easonal VMT to SMOKEformatted monthly VMT temporal profiles. Where necessary, the monthly or seasonal VMT data were converted into the SMOKE monthly tem poral profile format. In addition, New Jersey provided information for diurnal te mporal profiles. However, the level of detail or variability provided in these monthly profiles varied by State. Connecticut’s and Delaware’s profiles each varied by county and road type. Maryland’s profile s applied Statewide, with variability in the121 profiles by road type. Massachusetts’ profiles va ried by county, road t ype, and vehicle type. Both New Jersey and New York provided informa tion for three monthly temporal profiles, each used throughout one of the three county groups in each State. The Pennsylvania profiles varied by county, but not by road type. Vermont provide d information for a single monthly temporal profile to be used throughout the State.

B. Speciation Profiles

1. Point and Area Sources

The most recent SMOKE speciation cross-referen ce files available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for develo ping the cross-reference f iles for point and area sources. These files were revised to comple te SCC assignments for the Carbon Bond IV (CBIV) with PM mechanism for point and area sour ces. In addition, sulfur tagging species were

added to the REMSAD7 CB-IV with PM mechanism (see Table VII-1).

a. Point Sources

Thirty-one SCCs in the MANE-VU point source inventory did not have chemical speciationprofile assignments for the CB-IV with PM mechanism in the default SMOKE chemical crossreference file. For 10 of the SCCs, assignments for VOC and PM 2.5 were added to the speciation cross-reference file based on the speciation profil e codes assigned to similar SCCs. Table VII-7 shows the SCCs where an SCC speciation cross-reference record was added, the VOC and PM 2.5 speciation profile code assigned, and the method used to assign the profiles. Assignments were not completed for the remaining 21 point source SCCs because of a lack of information on the emission sources needed to complete the assignment s (see Table VII-8 for the list of the SCCs).

b. Area Sources

Speciation profile assignments were completed for many area source SCCs for the CB-IV with PM mechanism and were documented in separa te spreadsheet files provided to MARAMA during September 2004. Assignments for VOC and PM 2.5 were added to the speciation crossreference file based on the speciation profile code s assigned to similar SCCs. Note that the transport fractions for fugitive dust were applied as a part of the modeling effort to adjust the mass emissions in Version 3 of the inventory.

2. Nonroad Sources

No updates to the speciation profiles or speci ation assignments for nonroad sources were provided by the MANE-VU States.

3. Onroad Sources

No updates to the speciation prof iles or speciation assignments fo r onroad sources were provided by the MANE-VU States.122 C. Spatial Allocation Profiles

The most recent spatial profile data files available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for developing the spatia l profile file for point and area sources. A detailed description of this surrogate data set was provided in a file named “surrogate_
documentation_workbook052804.xls” from EPA’s we bsite at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ chief/emch/spatial/newsurrogate.html. Many SCCs in the MANE-VU inve ntory did not have surrogate assignments in the default SMOKE gridding cross-reference file. About 200 SCC assignments were added to the gridding cross-re ference file. The assignments were based on matching surrogate descriptions from the EPA99 surrogate data with th e SCC descriptions.

No updates to the spatial allocation files for nonroad and onroad sources were provided by the

MANE-VU States.

D. Preparation of SMOKE (IDA) and RP O Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0)

Formats

Table VII-9 identifies the mass emissions a nd SMOKE input files for Version 3 of the MANE-VU point, area, nonroad, an d onroad inventories.

The SMOKE input file format contains one field for storing daily emissions for each pollutant. The area source inventory contains summer day, winter day, and average day emissions depending on the state and source category. Thus, two sets of SMOKE input files were prepared for the area source inventory. One file contains annual, summer day, and average day emissions and the other file contains annual, winter day, and average day emissions. If summer day and average day emissions were provided for the sa me process and pollutant in the inventory, the summer day value was included in the SMOKE i nput file. If winter day and average day emissions were provided for the same process and pollutant in the inventory, the winter day value was included in the SMOKE input file.

The point source inventory cont ains summer day and winter day emissions. Two sets of SMOKE input files were prepared for point so urces as well (one file containing annual and summer day emissions and the other containi ng annual and winter day emissions).

Table VII-10 provides the unique li st of the start date, end date, and emission type combinations for daily emissions in the point and area source inventories that were used to define summer, winter, and average day emissions. This table also shows the names of the SMOKE input files in

which the emissions are included.

For onroad sources, daily emissions were cal culated by SMOKE using the monthly MOBILE6 input files included in th e SMOKE input files.

The nonroad IDA file only has annual total emissi ons. The values in the “typical day” column

are zero. Annual total emissions were allocate d for each hour using the monthly, weekly, and diurnal profiles described in S ection A.2 of this chapter.C-123Table VII-1. Profiles, Cross-references,and Documentation for Model Inputsfor Version 3 of 2002 MANE-VU InventoryDescription File Name FormatDate ofFile usedforVersion 3Size(Bytes)NotesSCC descriptions filescc_desc_manevu.083104.txtSMOKE 8/31/2004 1,335,524Temporal Allocation ProfilesTechnical memo onprofile/cross-referencereview for area sourcesMANE-VU_AreaEI_review_draft_090304.doc MSWord9/3/2004 760,320Technical memo onprofile/cross-referencereview for point sourcesMANE-VU_PointEI_review_draft_090304.doc MSWord9/3/2004 262,144Temporal profile crossreference file for pointsourcesamptref.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805.txt SMOKE 3/28/2005 704,998 Based on "amptref.m3.manevu.012405.txt" prepared forVersion 1, but added VISTAS BaseD cross-references tothe state-specific 2002 continuous emissions monitoring(CEM)-derived point sourcetemporal profiles generatedby VISTAS for their BaseD modeling.Temporal profiles file forpoint sourcesamptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.vistascem.032805.txt SMOKE 3/28/2005 178,427 Based on "amptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.030205.txt"prepared for Version 1, butadded state-specific 2002CEM-derived point source temporal profiles generated byVISTAS for their BaseD modeling.Temporal profile crossreference file for areasourcesamptref.m3.manevu.012405.txt SMOKE 1/24/2005 687,196Temporal profiles file forarea sourcesamptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.030205.txt SMOKE 3/2/2005 136,131Temporal crossreference file containingstate-specific onroadmobile source data forConnecticut, Delaware,Maryland,Massachusetts, NewJersey, New York,Pennsylvania, andVermontMANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006_addCT.txt SMOKE2/22/2006 2,522,013 Data for Connecticut were added to the file after the filewas prepared for the other states. Hence the reason“_addCT” is included at the end of the file name.Table VII-1 (continued)124Description File Name FormatDate ofFile usedforVersion 3Size(Bytes)NotesTemporal profiles filecontaining state-specificonroad mobile sourcedata for Connecticut,Delaware, Maryland,Massachusetts, NewJersey, New York,Pennsylvania, andVermontMANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006_addCT.txt SMOKE2/22/2006 23,122 Data for Connecticut wereadded to the file after the filewas prepared for the other states. Hence the reason“_addCT” is included at the end of the file name.Spatial/GriddingSpreadsheet summarygenerated for areasource gridding reviewMANE-VU_agref_review.xls 8/31/2004 1,607,680Spatial profile crossreference fileamgref.m3.us+can+mex.manevu.082404.txt SMOKE 8/31/2004 89,860Gridding surrogatecross-reference fileamgref_us_051704_manevu_added SMOKE 5/17/2004 35,825 Based on the surrogate cross-reference file downloadedfrom the EPA/CHIEF site thatcorresponds to the griddingsurrogates file. However, several MANE-VU-specificadditions included in"amgref.m3.us+can+mex.manevu.082404.txt" for Version1 were added to the gridding-cross reference filedownloaded from EPA. Theseare cross-references forSCCs 2806010000, 2806015000, 2870000011,2870000015, 2870000021, and 2870000022.Modeling grid (12-km) amgpro.12km_041604.otc12.us.txt SMOKE 4/16/2004 150,689,358 Based on downloaded 12-km EPA gridding surrogateswindowed for the OTC domainSpeciation ProfilesSpreadsheet summarygenerated for areasource speciation reviewMANE-VU_asref_review.xlsExcel 8/31/2004 5,626,880Speciation profiles filefor CB-IVgspro.cmaq.cb4p25.txt SMOKE 142,255Speciation crossreference file for CB-IVgsref.cmaq.cb4p25.manevu.083104.txt SMOKE 8/31/2004 786,998Table VII-1 (continued)125Description File Name FormatDate ofFile usedforVersion 3Size(Bytes)NotesSpeciation profile crossreference assignmentfilegsref.cmaq.cb4p25.txt SMOKE 2/1/2005 754,302 This file is based on the file"gsref.cmaq.cb4p25.manevu.083104.txt" prepared forversion 1 of the MANE-VU inventory. The only revisionwas to change the PM2_5 speciation profile # from itsdefault 99999 to 35501 for some mobile sourcecategories. This update had been done by eitherCENRAP or VISTAS in the speciation profiles theyprovided and the update had amore recent creation datethan the MANE-VU files created for Version 1, so thisappeared to be a refinement.Speciation profiles forREMSAD7gspro.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt_tag SMOKE 5/1/2005 532,990 Based on "gspro.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt" in the SMOKE,but added tagged species for REMSAD state-level sulfurtagging.Speciation crossreference for REMSAD7gsref.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt_tag SMOKE 5/1/2005 2,614,360 Based on "gsref.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt" in the SMOKE,but added tagged species for REMSAD state-levelsulfur tagging.Transport fractions forfugitive dustgcntl.xportfrac.txt SMOKE 2/1/2004124,495 File obtained from input file EPA used to adjust for PMtransport for modeling of Clean Air Interstate Rule(CAIR).C-126Table VII-2. Point Source Temporal Cross-reference AdditionsRecommended profilesState FIPS SCCMonthlyWeeklyDiurnalMethod of assignmentSCC Description (Complete description not alwaysavailable)VT 50005 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profilesExternal Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/BarkWaste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)VT 50019 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profilesExternal Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/BarkWaste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)VT 50021 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profilesExternal Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/BarkWaste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)VT 50017 10300908 262 7 24 Use SCC=103009XX profiles External CombustionBoilers;Commercial/Institutional;Wood/Bark Waste;Woodfired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)PA 42009 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profilesInternal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42029 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profilesInternal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42045 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profilesInternal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42061 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profilesInternal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42067 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profilesInternal Combustion Engines;Industrial;NaturalGas;UnknownPA 42015 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal CombustionEngines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;UnknownPA 42029 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal CombustionEngines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;UnknownPA 42037 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal CombustionEngines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;UnknownPA 42071 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal CombustionEngines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;UnknownPA 42011 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other NotClassified;Specify in CommentsPA 42123 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other NotClassified;Specify in CommentsPA 42123 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other NotClassified;Specify in CommentsPA 42129 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other NotClassified;Specify in CommentsMD 24031 30500261 262 7 24 Use SCC=30500260 profileIndustrial Processes;Mineral Products;AsphaltConcrete;Drum MixPlant: Rotary Drum Dryer/Mixer,Waste/Drain/#6 Oil-FiredTable VII-2 (continued)127Recommended profilesState FIPS SCCMonthlyWeeklyDiurnalMethod of assignmentSCC Description (Complete description not alwaysavailable)NY 36055 31603001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SubstratePreparation;Extrusion OperationsNY 36055 31603002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SubstratePreparation;Film Support OperationsNY 36055 31604001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - ChemicalPreparation;Chemical ManufacturingNY 36055 31604002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - ChemicalPreparation;Emulsion Making OperationsNY 36055 31604003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - ChemicalPreparation;Chemical Mixing OperationsNY 36055 31605001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SurfaceTreatments;Surface Coating OperationsNY 36055 31605002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SurfaceTreatments;Grid IonizersNY 36055 31605003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - SurfaceTreatments;Corona Discharge TreatmentNY 36055 31606001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - FinishingOperations;General Film ManufacturingNY 36055 31606002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - FinishingOperations;Cutting/Slitting OperationsPA 42101 31606002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Product Manufacturing - FinishingOperations;Cutting/Slitting OperationsNY 36055 31612001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;TankCleaning OperationsNY 36055 31612002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - CleaningOperations;GeneralCleaning OperationsNY 36055 31613002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - StorageOperations;General Storage OperationsTable VII-2 (continued)128Recommended profilesState FIPS SCCMonthlyWeeklyDiurnalMethod of assignmentSCC Description (Complete description not alwaysavailable)NY 36055 31614001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Material TransferOperations;Filling Operations (non petroleum)NY 36055 31614002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Material TransferOperations;Transfer of ChemicalsNY 36055 31615001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - SeparationProcesses;Recovery OperationsNY 36055 31615003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - SeparationProcesses;Distillation OperationsNY 36055 31616002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;GeneralProcess Tank OperationsNY 36055 31616003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - OtherOperations;MiscellaneousManufacturing OperationsNY 36055 31616004 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities- Other Operations;PaintSpraying OperationsNY 36055 31616006 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 asguidance and evaluate specificsourcesIndustrial Processes;Photographic FilmManufacturing;Support Activities - OtherOperations;Chemical Weighing OperationsPA Numerouscounties39000698 262 7 24 Use SCC=39000699 profile Industrial Processes;In-process Fuel Use;NaturalGas;UnknownNJ Numerouscounties39999901 262 7 24 Use SCC=399999XX profiles Industrial Processes;Miscellaneous ManufacturingIndustries;Miscellaneous Industrial Processes;UnknownPA 42015 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42017 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42091 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42095 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42097 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface CoatingOperations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;UnknownPA 42013 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum LiquidsStorage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;UnknownPA 42041 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum LiquidsStorage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;UnknownTable VII-2 (continued)129Recommended profilesState FIPS SCCMonthlyWeeklyDiurnalMethod of assignmentSCC Description (Complete description not alwaysavailable)PA 42045 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum LiquidsStorage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;UnknownPA 42071 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum LiquidsStorage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;UnknownC-130 Table VII-3. Unknown SCCs in th e MANE-VU Point Source Inventory

State FIPS SCC Description

PA 42101 24950002 Need more info: Unknown SCC
PA 42061 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General
PA 42091 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General
PA 42133 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; GeneralC-131Table VII-4. Area Source Temporal Cross-Reference UpdatesSMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal30502713 Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Industrial Sandand Gravel;Screening: Size Classification262 7 24 262 5 1230502760 Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Industrial Sandand Gravel;Sand Handling, Transfer, and Storage262 7 24 262 5 122302000000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC20;All Processes;Total262 7 26 262 7 2502302050000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC20;Bakery Products;Total262 7 26 262 5 262305000000 Industrial Processes;Mineral Processes: SIC 32;AllProcesses;Total262 7 26 262 5 102309100010 Industrial Processes;Fabricated Metals: SIC 34;Coating,Engraving, and Allied Services;Electroplating262 7 26 262 5 102311010000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;GeneralBuilding Construction;Total262 7 26 262 5 122311020000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;HeavyConstruction;Total262 7 26 262 5 122311030000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;RoadConstruction;Total262 7 26 262 5 122325000000 Industrial Processes;Mining and Quarrying: SIC 14;AllProcesses;Total262 7 26 262 5 102399000000 Industrial Processes;Industrial Processes: NEC;IndustrialProcesses: NEC;Total262 7 26 262 5 102399010000 Industrial Processes; IndustrialRefrigeration; Refrigerant Losses; AllProcesses262 7 26 262 5 102401015000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Factory FinishedWood: SIC 2426 thru 242;Total: All Solvent Types173 7 26 173 5 262401020000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Wood Furniture: SIC25;Total: All Solvent Types287 7 26 287 5 262401025000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Furniture: SIC25;Total: All Solvent Types287 7 26 287 5 262401030000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Paper: SIC 26;Total:All Solvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262401040000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Cans: SIC341;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262401045000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Coils: SIC3498;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262401050000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;MiscellaneousFinished Metals: SIC 34 - (341 + 3498);Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 26Table VII-4 (continued)132SMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal2401055000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Machinery andEquipment: SIC 35;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262401060000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Large Appliances:SIC 363;Total: All Solvent Types262 7 26 262 5 262401065000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Electronic and OtherElectrical: SIC 36 - 363;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262401070000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Motor Vehicles: SIC371;Total: All Solvent Types140 7 26 140 5 262401075000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Aircraft: SIC372;Total: All Solvent Types169 7 26 169 5 262401080000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Marine: SIC373;Total: All Solvent Types266 7 26 266 5 262401085000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Railroad: SIC374;Total: All Solvent Types169 7 26 169 5 262401090000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;MiscellaneousManufacturing;Total: All Solvent Types260 7 26 260 5 262401090999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;MiscellaneousManufacturing;Solvents: NEC260 7 26 260 5 262401200000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Other SpecialPurpose Coatings;Total: All Solvent Types260 7 26 260 5 262401990000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;All Surface CoatingCategories;Total: All Solvent Types260 7 26 260 5 262401990999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;All Surface CoatingCategories;Solvents: NEC260 7 26 260 5 262415000000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Processes/AllIndustries;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 262415020000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products(SIC 34): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415025000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery andEquipment (SIC 35): All Processes;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415030000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.(SIC 36): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415035000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment(SIC 37): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415045000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;MiscellaneousManufacturing (SIC 39): All Processes;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415055000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Automotive Dealers (SIC55): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415060000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous RepairServices (SIC 76): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 12Table VII-4 (continued)133SMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal2415065000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC75): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 6 122415100000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Open TopDegreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415105000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Furniture and Fixtures(SIC 25): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415110000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Primary Metal Industries(SIC 33): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415120000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products(SIC 34): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415125000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery andEquipment (SIC 35): Open Top Degreasing;Total: AllSolvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415130000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.(SIC 36): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415135000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment(SIC 37): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415140000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Instruments and RelatedProducts (SIC 38): Open Top Degreasing;Total: AllSolvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415145000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;MiscellaneousManufacturing (SIC 39): OpenTop Degreasing;Total: AllSolvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415200000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries:Conveyerized Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415230000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.(SIC 36): Conveyerized Degreasing;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415300000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: ColdCleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415305000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Furniture and Fixtures(SIC 25): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415310000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Primary Metal Industries(SIC 33): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415320000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products(SIC 34): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415325000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery andEquipment (SIC 35): Cold Cleaning;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415330000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.(SIC 36): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 12Table VII-4 (continued)134SMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal2415335000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment(SIC 37): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415340000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Instruments and RelatedProducts (SIC 38): Cold Cleaning;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415345000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;MiscellaneousManufacturing (SIC 39): Cold Cleaning;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122415355000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Automotive Dealers (SIC55): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 5 122415360000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC75): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types253 7 26 253 6 122415365000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous RepairServices (SIC 76): Cold Cleaning;Total: All SolventTypes253 7 26 253 5 122425000000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;All Processes;Total: AllSolvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262425010000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Lithography;Total: AllSolvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262425020000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Letterpress;Total: AllSolvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262425030000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Rotogravure;Total: AllSolvent Types262 7 26 262 5 262425040000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Flexography;Total: AllSolvent Types257 7 26 257 5 262430000000 Solvent Utilization;Rubber/Plastics;All Processes;Total:All Solvent Types200 7 26 200 5 262601010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;On-siteIncineration;Industrial;Total262 7 26 262 5 122601020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;On-siteIncineration;Commercial/Institutional;Total262 7 26 262 5 122610010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;OpenBurning;Industrial;Total262 7 26 262 5 122610020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;OpenBurning;Commercial/Institutional;Total262 7 26 262 5 122805020000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 1500 7 262805025000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Hogs and Pigs Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 1500 7 262805030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 1500 7 26Table VII-4 (continued)135SMOKE Default profile New MANE-VU profileSCC SCC descriptionMonthly Weekly Diurnal Monthly Weekly Diurnal2805035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Horses and Ponies Waste Emissions;Total262 7 26 1500 7 262805040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Sheep and Lambs Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 1500 7 262805045001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Total489 7 26 262 7 242810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;OtherCombustion;Prescribed Burning for ForestManagement;Total14 7 24 3 11 13C-136 Table VII-5. Area Source Tempor al Cross-Reference Additions

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2104008002 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert;

non-EPA certified 485 7 26

2104008003 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; non-catalytic 485 7 26

2104008004 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; catalytic 485 7 26

2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 262 7 26

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26

2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 262 7 26

2302080002 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Miscellaneous Food and Kindred Products;Refrigeration 262 7 26

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surfac e Coating;Architectural Coatings - Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surfac e Coating;Architectural Coatings - Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26

2401102000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Maintenance Coatings-Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26

2401103000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Maintenance Coatings-Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26

2415270000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Manufacturing (except SIC 36): Vapor and In-Line Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12

2415280000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec. (SIC 36): Vapor and In-Line Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12

2415370000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment Repair Services: Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12

2415380000 Solvent Utilization;Degrea sing;All Manufacturing: Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12

2610000400 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open Burning;All Categories;Yard Waste - Brush Species Unspecified 262 7 26

2610000500 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open Burning;All Categories;Land Clearing Debris (use 28- 10-005-000 for Logging Debris Burning) 262 7 26

2610040400 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open Burning;Municipal (collected from residences, parks,other for central burn);Yard Waste - Total 262 7 26

2630020010 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Wastewater Treatment Processes Total 262 7 24Table VII-5 (continued)

137 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2630020020 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Biosolids Processes Total 262 7 24

2630020030 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24

2630050000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24

2680001000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Composting;100% Bi osolids (e.g., sewage sludge, manure, mixtures of these matls);All

Processes 262 7 26

2680002000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Composting;Mixed Waste (e.g., a 50:50 mixture of biosolids and gr een wastes);All Processes 262 7 26

2801700011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Fertilizer Applicat ion;Calcium Ammonium

Nitrate 998 7 26

2801700012 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Fertilizer Applicat ion;Potassium Nitrate 998 7 26

2801700013 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Fertilizer Applicat ion;Diammonium Phosphate 998 7 26

2801700014 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Fertilizer Applic ation;Monoammonium Phosphate 998 7 26

2801700015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Fertilizer Application;Liquid Ammonium Polyphosphate 998 7 26

2801700099 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Fertilizer Applicati on;Miscellaneous Fertilizers 998 7 26

2805001100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Confinement 1500 7 26

2805001200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Manur e handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805001300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805002000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef Cattle Composite; Not Elsewhere
Classified 1500 7 26

2805003100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on pasture/range;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805007100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure management systems;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805007200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems;Management 1500 7 26

2805007300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure management systems;Land application of manure 262 7 24

2805007330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems; Land application 1500 7 26

2805007340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems; Land application 1500 7 26Table VII-5 (continued)

138 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2805008100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805008200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805008300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805009100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805009300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805010100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Confinement 262 7 24

2805010200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Manure handling and storage 262 7 24

2805010300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805018000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle composite; Not Elsewhere
Classified 1501 7 26

2805019100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805019200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805019300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Land application of

manure 1500 7 26

2805020001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Milk
Cows 1500 7 26

2805020002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Beef
Cows 1500 7 26

2805020003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Heifers
and Heifer Calves 1500 7 26

2805021300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Land application
of manure 1500 7 26

2805022100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805022200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805022300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805023300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805030001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Pullet Chicks and

Pullets less than 13 weeks old 1500 7 26Table VII-5 (continued)

139 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2805030002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Pullets 13 weeks

old and older but less than 20 weeks 1500 7 26

2805030003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Layers 1500 7 26

2805030004 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Broilers 1500 7 26

2805030008 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry Waste Emissions;Geese 1500 7 26

2805039100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805039200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26

2805039300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805045000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Not Elsewhere
Classified 1500 7 26

2805045002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Angora Goats 1500 7 26

2805045003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Milk Goats 1500 7 26

2805047100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations;Confinement 1500 7 26

2805047300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations;Land application of manure 1500 7 26

2805053100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations;
Confinement 1500 7 26

2805054000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;"Mules; Donkeys; and Burros Waste Emissions";Not Elsewhere Classified 262 7 24

2806010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals Waste Emissions;Cats;Total 262 7 24

2806015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals Waste Emissions;Dogs;Total 262 7 24

2807020001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste Emissions;Bears;Black Bears 262 7 26

2807020002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste Emissions;Bears;Grizzly Bears 262 7 26

2807025000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste Emissions;Elk;Total 262 7 26

2807030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste Emissions;Deer;Total 262 7 26

2807040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste Emissions;Birds;Total 262 7 26

2810060100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Cremation;Humans 262 7 24

2870000001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Respiration and Perspiration;Total 262 7 24

2870000002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Infant Diapered Waste;Total 262 7 24

2870000011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Household Products;Total 262 7 24Table VII-5 (continued)

140 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal

2870000015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Nonagricultural Fertilizers;Total 3 7 24

2870000021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals;Dogs;Total 262 7 24

2870000022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals;Cats;Total 262 7 24

2870000031 Miscellaneous Area Sources; Wild Animals;Deer;Total 262 7 24C-141 Table VII-6. Area Source Temporal Cr oss-Reference and Profile Additions for the MANE-VU Inventory

SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2102002000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal;Total: All Boiler Types 1726 8 26 10000

2102006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Natural Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines 1727 8 26 10000

2102007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Boiler Types 1727 8 26 10000

2103001000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Anthracite Coal;Total: All Boiler Types 1720 8 26 10000

2103004000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Commercial/Institut ional;Distillate Oil;Total: Boilers and IC Engines 1721 8 26 10000

2103006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Commercial/Institut ional;Natural Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines 1722 8 26 10000

2103007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Combustor Types 1723 8 26 10000

2104002000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal;Total: All Combustor Types 1732 7 26 10000

2104004000 Stationary Source Fuel Comb ustion;Residential;Distillate Oil;Total: All Combustor Types 1733 7 26 10000

2104006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Natural Gas;Total: All Combustor Types 1734 7 26 10000

2104007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG);Tota l: All Combustor Types 1735 7 26 10000

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combus tion;Residential;Wood;Total: Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1740 2007 2014 10001

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combus tion;Residential;Wood;Total: Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1741 2008 2015 10003

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combus tion;Residential;Wood;Total: Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1742 2009 2016 10005

2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combus tion;Residential;Wood;Total: Woodstoves and Fireplaces 1742 2009 2016 10005

2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment; 1743 2010 2017 10001

2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment; 1744 2011 2017 10003

2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Wood;Outdoor Wood Burning Equipment; 1745 2012 2017 10005

2104011000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Keros ene;Total: All Heater Types 1736 7 26 10000

2294000000 Mobile Sources;Paved Roads;All Paved Roads;Total: Fugitives 1729 7 26 10000

2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000

2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000Table VII-6 (continued)

142 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26 10000

2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26 10000

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000

2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000

2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000

2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC 20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000

2311030000 Industrial Processes;Cons truction: SIC 15 - 17;Road Construction;Total 262 7 9 10000

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Architectural Coatings - Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 -9

2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Architectural Coatings - Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 20 27 10000

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Architectural Coatings - Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 -9

2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Architectural Coatings - Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 20 27 10000

2401005000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Total: All Solvent Types 1702 5 27 10000

2401005500 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Surface Preparation Solvents 1702 5 27 10000

2401005600 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Primers 1702 5 27 10000

2401005700 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Top Coats 1702 5 27 10000

2401005800 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Clean-up Solvents 1702 5 27 10000

2401005800 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coat ing;Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532;Clean-up Solvents 1702 5 27 10001

2401008000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coati ng;Traffic Markings;Total: All Solvent Types 1700 7 26 -9

2401008000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coati ng;Traffic Markings;Total: All Solvent Types 1700 5 26 10000

2401008999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coati ng;Traffic Markings;Solvents:
NEC 1700 7 26 -9

2401102000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Maintenance Coatings-Solvent-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26 10000

2401103000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Maintenance Coatings-Water-based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26 10000

2415100000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasi ng;All Industries: Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 262 6 5 10000

2415130000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec. (SIC 36): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 262 6 5 10000

2415300000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasi ng;All Industries: Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 262 6 5 10000

2415360000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC 75): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 262 5 5 10000

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1712 7 26 10001

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1714 7 26 10001

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1713 7 26 10003Table VII-6 (continued)

143 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1712 7 26 10003

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1714 7 26 10005

2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1713 7 26 10005

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1709 7 26 10001

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1711 7 26 10001

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1710 7 26 10003

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1709 7 26 10003

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1711 7 26 10005

2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1710 7 26 10005

2461850001 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Pesticide Applicati on: Agricultural;Herbicides,
Corn 536 7 26 10000

2461850005 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Pesticide Applicati on: Agricultural;Herbicides, Soy Beans 536 7 26 10000

2461850006 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Pesticide Applicati on: Agricultural;Herbicides, Hay & Grains 536 7 26 10000

2461850051 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Pesticide Applic ation: Agricultural;Other Pesticides, Corn 536 7 26 10000

2461850055 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Pesticide Applic ation: Agricultural;Other Pesticides, Soy Beans 536 7 26 10000

2461850056 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non-industrial: Commercial;Pesticide Applic ation: Agricultural;Other Pesticides, Hay & Grains 536 7 26 10000

2501011010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Vapor Losses 1701 7 26 10000

2501011010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Vapor Losses 1701 7 26 10000

2501011011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers : Residential;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000

2501011011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers : Residential;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000

2501011012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000

2501011012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000

2501011015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501011015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501011016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Transport 1701 7 26 10000

2501011016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Transport 1701 7 26 10000

2501012010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Vapor Losses 1701 7 26 10000

2501012010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Vapor Losses 1701 7 26 10000Table VII-6 (continued)

144 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2501012011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000

2501012011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000

2501012012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000

2501012012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000

2501012015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501012015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501012016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Transport 1701 7 26 10000

2501012016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Transport 1701 7 26 10000

2501060000 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stati ons;Total: All Gasoline/All

Processes 1701 7 26 -9

2501060050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 -9

2501060051 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stat ions;Stage 1: Submerged Filling 1701 7 26 -9

2501060052 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stati ons;Stage 1: Splash Filling 1701 7 26 -9

2501060053 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Balanced Submerged Filling 1701 7 26 -9

2501060100 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 -9

2501060100 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Total 1724 7 26 10000

2501060101 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stati ons;Stage 2: Displacement
Loss/Uncontrolled 1701 7 26 -9

2501060102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stati ons;Stage 2: Displacement
Loss/Controlled 1701 7 26 -9

2501060103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Spillage 1701 7 26 -9

2501060201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Underground Tank: Breathing and Emptying 1701 7 26 -9

2501060204 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Service Stat ions;Stage 2: Off-Highway Equipment Displacement Loss/Controlled 1701 7 26 10000

2501060205 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Gasoline Serv ice Stations;Stage 2: Off-Highway Equipment Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501080050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports : Aviation Gasoline;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501080102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports: Aviation Gaso line;Stage 2: Displacement

Loss 1701 7 26 10000

2501080103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports: Aviation Ga soline;Stage 2: Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501080201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Underground Tank: Breathing and Emptying 1701 7 26 10000Table VII-6 (continued)

145 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2501090050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501090060 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501090070 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports: Jet Naphtha or JP-4;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501090080 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports: Jet Naphtha or JP-4;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501090101 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP-8;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 10000

2501090102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Marinas: Gasoline; Stage 2: Displacement Loss 1701 7 26 10000

2501090103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Marinas: Gasolin e;Stage 2: Spillage 1701 7 26 10000

2501090201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;U nderground Tank: Emptying and Breathing 1701 7 26 10000

2505000000 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product Transport;All Transport Types;Total: All Products 1701 7 26 -9

2610010000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open Burning;Industrial;Total 262 9 2013 10000

2630020000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Total Processed 262 7 24 10000

2630020010 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Wastewater Treatment Processes

Total 262 7 24 10000

2630020020 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Biosolids Processes Total 262 7 24 10000

2630020030 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24 10000

2630050000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Wastewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24 10000

2680001000 Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Composting;100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage sludge, manure, mixtures of t hese matls);All Processes 262 7 26 10000

2730100000 Natural Sources;Geogenic;Wind Erosion;Total 1704 7 26 10000

2801001001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Corn;Land prepar ation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001005 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Wheat;Land prepar ation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001009 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Barley;Land prepar ation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001013 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Soybeans;Land prepar ation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001017 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Hay/Alfalfa;Land pre paration and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801001021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Vegetables;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000

2801002001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Corn;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Wheat;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Barley;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002004 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Soybeans;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002005 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Hay/Alfalfa;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

2801002006 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Crops;Vegetables;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000Table VII-6 (continued)

146 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2801700020 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Crops;Fertilizer Application;Corn 1705 7 26 10000

2801700021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Crops;Fertilizer A pplication;Sorghum 1705 7 26 10000

2801700022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Crops;Fertilizer A pplication;Wheat 1705 7 26 10000

2801700023 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Crops;Fertilizer Application;Barley 1705 7 26 10000

2801700024 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Crops;Fertilizer App lication;Soybeans 1705 7 26 10000

2801700025 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Crops;Fertilizer App lication;Hay/Alfalfa 1705 7 26 10000

2801700026 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Crops;Fertilizer App lication;Vegetables 1705 7 26 10000

2805001100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Confinement 1706 7 24 10000

2805001200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Manure handling 1706 7 24 10000

2805001300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land application of 1706 7 24 10000

2805001310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000

2805001320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000

2805001330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000

2805001340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000

2805002000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Beef Cattle Composite; Total 1706 7 24 10000

2805007100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure management systems;Confinement 262 7 24 10000

2805007200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems;Man 262 7 24 10000

2805007300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure management systems;Land applicati 262 7 24 10000

2805007340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems;Lan 262 7 24 10000

2805008100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Confinement 262 7 24 10000

2805008200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Manure handlin 262 7 24 10000

2805008310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with wet manure management systems;Lan 1708 7 24 10000

2805008320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with wet manure management systems;Lan 1708 7 24 10000Table VII-6 (continued)

147 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2805009100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Confinement 262 7 24 10000

2805009200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Manure handling and storage 262 7 24 10000

2805009330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - broilers;Land Application of

solid manure wit 1708 7 24 10000

2805009340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - broilers;Land Application of

solid manure wit 1708 7 24 10000

2805010100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Confinement 262 7 24 10000

2805010200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Manure handling and storage 262 7 24 10000

2805010330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - turkeys;Land Application of

solid manure with 1708 7 24 10000

2805010340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Poultry Production - turkeys;Land Application of

solid manure with 1708 7 24 10000

2805019100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Confinement 1706 7 24 10000

2805019200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Manure handling and storage 1706 7 24 10000

2805019300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Land application of

manure 1706 7 24 10000

2805019310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of liquid

manure with 1706 7 24 10000

2805019320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of liquid

manure witho 1706 7 24 10000

2805019330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of solid

manure with i 1706 7 24 10000

2805019340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of solid

manure withou 1706 7 24 10000

2805021100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Confinement 1706 7 24 10000

2805021200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Manure handling and storage 1706 7 24 10000

2805021310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of liquid manure with 1706 7 24 10000

2805021320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of liquid manure with 1706 7 24 10000

2805021330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of solid

manure with 1706 7 24 10000

2805021340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of solid

manure witho 1706 7 24 10000

2805023100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylo t/pasture dairy;Confinement 1706 7 24 10000Table VII-6 (continued)

148 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2805023200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Manure handling and storage 1706 7 24 10000

2805023310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application of liquid man 1706 7 24 10000

2805023320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application of liquid man 1706 7 24 10000

2805023330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application
of solid manu 1706 7 24 10000

2805023340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application
of solid manu 1706 7 24 10000

2805035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Horses and Ponies Waste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000

2805038100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons (unspecified animal age);Confineme 1707 7 24 10000

2805038200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons (unspecified animal age);Manure ha 1707 7 24 10000

2805038300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons (unspecified animal age);Land appl 1707 7 24 10000

2805039100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Confinement 1707 7 24 10000

2805039200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Manure handling and storage 1707 7 24 10000

2805039310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000

2805039320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000

2805039330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000

2805039340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000

2805040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Sheep and Lambs Waste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000

2805045001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Goats Waste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000

2805046100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations (unspecified animal age);Confine 1707 7 24 10000

2805046300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations (unspecified animal age);Land ap 1707 7 24 10000

2805047100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - deep-pit house operations;Confinement 1707 7 24 10000

2805047200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000Table VII-6 (continued)

149 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS

2805047310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

2805047320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

2805047330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

2805047340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

2805052100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - out door operations (unspecified animal age);Confinement 1707 7 24 10000

2805053100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production - Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations;
Confinement 1707 7 24 10000

2805053200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - outdo or operations (unspecified animal age);Man 1707 7 24 10000

2805053310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - outdo or operations (unspecified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000

2805053320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - outdo or operations (unspecified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000

2805053330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - outdo or operations (unspecified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000

2805053340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;Swine Production - outdo or operations (unspecified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000

2805054000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production - Livestock;"Mules; Donkeys; and Burros Waste Emissions";Not Elsewhere Classif 262 7 24 10000

2806010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals Waste Emissions;Cats;Total 262 7 24 10000

2806015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals Waste Emissions;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 10000

2807030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste Emissions;Deer;Total 262 7 24 10000

2807040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals Waste Emissions;Birds;Total 262 7 24 10000

2810010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources ;Other Combustion;Human Perspiration and Respiration;Total 1739 2006 24 10000

2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Ot her Combustion;Prescribed Burning for Forest Management;Total 1731 7 24 10000

2810030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Ot her Combustion;Structure Fires;Total 1715 7 24 10000

2810035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Ot her Combustion;Firefighting Training;Total 1716 2004 24 10000

2870000001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Respiration and Perspiration;Total 262 7 24 10000

2870000002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Infant Diapered Waste;Total 262 7 24 10000

2870000011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Household Products;Total 262 7 24 10000

2870000015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Nonagricultural Fertilizers;Total 3 7 24 10000Table VII-6 (continued)

150 SCC Description Month Week Diurnal FIPS 2870000021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Dome stic Animals;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Dome stic Animals;Cats;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000031 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals;Deer;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000032 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Wild Animals;Birds;Total 1728 7 24 10000C-151 Table VII-7. Point Source Speciati on Profiles Added to Speciation Crossreference File for CB-IV with PM Mechanism

Recommended
Profiles
State FIPS SCC VOC PM 2.5 Method of Assignment SCC Description (Complete description not always available)

VT 50005 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)
VT 50019 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)

VT 50021 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)

VT 50017 10300908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=103009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Commercial/Instituti onal;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood-fired Boiler - Dry Wood (<20% moisture)

PA 42009 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;I ndustrial;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42029 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;I ndustrial;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42045 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;I ndustrial;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42061 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;I ndustrial;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42067 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;I ndustrial;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42015 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Co mmercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42029 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Co mmercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42037 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Co mmercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42071 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Co mmercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Unknown

PA 42011 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;F ugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments

PA 42123 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;F ugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments

PA 42123 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;F ugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments

PA 42129 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;F ugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments

MD 24031 30500261 0025 22035 Use SCC=30500260 profile Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Asphalt Concrete;Drum Mix Plant: Rotary Drum Dryer/Mixer, Waste/Drain/#6 Oil-Fired

PA Numerous

counties 39000698 0000 22004 Use SCC=39000699 profile Industrial Processes;In-process Fuel Use;Natural Gas;Unknown

NJ Numerous

counties 39999901 9003 22054 Use SCC=399999XX profiles Industrial Processes;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries;Miscellaneous Indus trial Processes;Unknown
PA 42015 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown

PA 42017 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown

PA 42091 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown

PA 42095 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown

PA 42097 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown

PA 42013 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown

PA 42041 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown
PA 42045 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown
PA 42071 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non-Refinery);Bulk Plants;UnknownC-152 Table VII-8. Point Source SCCs Lacking Speciation Profile Assignments for CB-IV

with PM Mechanism

State FIPS SCC Description

NY 36055 31603001 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Product Manufacturing - Substrate Preparation;Extrus ion Operations
NY 36055 31603002 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Product Manufacturing - Substrate Preparation;Film Support Operations
NY 36055 31604001 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Chemical Manufacturing
NY 36055 31604002 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Emulsion Making Operations
NY 36055 31604003 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Chemical Mixing Operations
NY 36055 31605001 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Surface C oating Operations
NY 36055 31605002 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Grid Ionizers
NY 36055 31605003 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Corona Di scharge Treatment
NY 36055 31606001 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;General Film Manufacturing
NY 36055 31606002 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;Cutting/S litting Operations PA 42101 31606002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;Cutting/S litting Operations
NY 36055 31612001 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;Tank Cleaning Operations
NY 36055 31612002 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;General Cleaning Operations

NY 36055 31613002 Industrial Processe s;Photographic Film Manufactur ing;Support Activities - Storage Operations;General St orage Operations
NY 36055 31614001 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Material Transfer Operations;Filling Operations (non petroleum)
NY 36055 31614002 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Material Transfer Operations;Transfer of Chemicals
NY 36055 31615001 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Support Activities - Separation Processes;Recovery Operations
NY 36055 31615003 Industrial Processes; Photographic Film Manufacturing; Support Activities - Separation Processes;Distillation Operations

NY 36055 31616002 Industrial Processe s;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;General Proc ess Tank Operations

NY 36055 31616003 Industrial Processe s;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Operations

NY 36055 31616004 Industrial Processe s;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Paint Spraying Operations

NY 36055 31616006 Industrial Processe s;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Chemical Weighing Operations153 Table VII-9. Summary of Version 3 Mass Emissions and SMOKE Input Files

S/L Agencies Included

in Files NIF 3.0 File Name Containing Mass Emissions Inventory (Access 2000 Database Files) Temporal Period of

Mass Emissions Inventory SMOKE Input File Name Temporal Period of

Emissions in
SMOKE/IDA File Point Source Inventory
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA (state and Philadelphia, and Allegheny Counties), RI, VT MANEVU_2002_Pt_Versi on 3_040706.mdb Annual, Summer Day, and Winter Day MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_IN PUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERD AY_042706.txt Annual and Summer Day

“ “ “ MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_IN PUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDA Y_042706.txt Annual and Winter Day

Area Source Inventory
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_Area_04

0606.mdb Annual, Summer Day, Winter Day, and

Average Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_I NPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMER DAY_040606.txt Annual, Summer Day, and Average Day

“ “ “ MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_I NPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERD AY_040606.txt Annual, Winter Day, and Average Day

Nonroad Source Inventory
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_NRD2002_NIF _030306.mdb Annual MANEVU_NRD2002_SMOK E_030306.ida Annual

Onroad Source Inventory

CT CT2002MANEVUORCAP _122004.mdb Annual

DE DE2002MANEVUORCAP _072004.mdb Annual

DC DC2002MANEVUORCAP _072004.mdb Annual

ME ME2002MANEVUORCAP _072004.mdb Annual

MD MD2002MANEVUORCA P_072004.mdb Annual

MA MA2002MANEVUORCAP _022006_Access2000.md

b
MA2002MANEVUORCAP _022006_Access97.mdb Annual

NH NH2002MANEVUORCAP _072004.mdb Annual

NJ NJ2002MANEVUORCAP _022006_Access2000.md

b
NJ2002MANEVUORCAP _022006_Access97.mdb Annual

NY NY2002MANEVUORCAP _072004.mdb Annual

PA PA2002MANEVUORCAP _072004.mdb Annual

RI DRI2002MANEVUORCA P_072004.mdb Annual

VT VT2002MANEVUORCAP _122004.mdb Annual

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_020

22006.txt

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mcref_0202

2006.txt154 S/L Agencies Included

in Files NIF 3.0 File Name Containing Mass Emissions Inventory (Access 2000 Database Files) Temporal Period of

Mass Emissions Inventory SMOKE Input File Name Temporal Period of

Emissions in
SMOKE/IDA File

DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA,

VT MANEVU_2002_mtpro_0202

2006.txt
DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA,

VT MANEVU_2002_mtref_0202

2006.txt
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mvref_0202

2006.txt

CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02

022006.txt

MANEVU_2002_mcodes.txt CT, NY MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt
CT, NY MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt
CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT SMOKE MOBILE6 input

files—too numerous to list individually

Table VII-10. Unique List of St art Date, End Date, and Emission Type Combinations for Daily Emissions in the MANE-VU 2002 Point and Area Source Inventories, Version 3

Start

Date End Date Emission Type Emission Type Period Season Designation SMOKE File Point Source Inventory
20011201 20020228 27 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point _SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt
20011201 20020228 29 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point _SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt
20020101 20020331 27 NONANNUAL Winter MANEVU_Point _SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt
20020101 20021231 29 NONANNUAL MD-Winter MANEVU_Point _SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt
VT-Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt
20020501 20020930 29 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt
20020601 20020831 27 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt
20020601 20020831 29 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt
20020601 20020831 30 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt Area Source Inventory

20020101 20020831 27 Daily Average Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt

and MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt

20020101 20021231 29 Daily Average Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt

and MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt

20020401 20020930 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020401 20021031 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020512 20020512 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020831 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020831 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020929 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020629 20020629 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt

20011201 20020228 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20011201 20020228 29 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021029 20021029 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021104 20021104 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021205 20021205 27 Daily Winter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt155 CHAPTER VIII. METHODS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE MANE-VU REGION

Figure VIII-1 shows the geographic area for which the 12-kilomete r (km) CMAQ modeling domain was used to support air quality modeli ng for the MANE-VU region. The 36-km domain definition was used for geographical areas outs ide of the area show n in Figure VIII-1. Table VIII-1 identifies the ge ographic region as well as the t ypes of emissions inventory and ancillary data used to in modeling for the MANE-VU region. The geographic areas for which data were obtained include the Visibility Impr ovement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS), Central Regional Air Planning Organization (CENRAP), and WRAP RPOs, the Midwest RPO, Canada, and Mexico.

Figure VIII-1. MANE-VU 12-Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domain156Table VIII-1. Description of Non-MANE-VU RegionInventory Data Used for MANE-VU BaseB Modeling* Only utilized for 2002 BaseA 36-km modeling to generate boundary conditions for BaseA/BaseA1/BaseB current and future year 12-km modeling.GeographicalRegion/RPO Raw DataTime Periodand VersionNumberRaw DataFormat Source of Data Source of Ancillary DataDate Data and SummariesObtained by MANE-VU ModelersVISTAS Point, area,nonroad, andmobile2002 BaseG SMOKE IDA Gregory Stella, AlpineGeophysicsGregory Stella, AlpineGeophysicsJune/July 2006MRPO Point, area,nonroad, andmobile2002 BaseK SMOKE IDA NIF files provided by MarkJanssen, MRPO, andconverted to IDA format byGregory Stella, AlpineGeophysicsPart of VISTAS 2002 BaseDprovided by Gregory Stella,Alpine GeophysicsMay 2006CENRAP Point, area,nonroad, andmobile2002 BaseB SMOKE IDA CENRAP ftp siteLee Warden, Oklahoma DEQCENRAP ftp siteLee Warden, OklahomaDEQMarch 2006WRAP * Point, area,nonroad, andmobilePart ofVISTAS2002 BaseDSMOKE IDA Part of VISTAS 2002 BaseDprovided by Gregory Stella,Alpine GeophysicsPart of VISTAS 2002 BaseDprovided by Gregory Stella,Alpine GeophysicsJanuary 2005Area, nonroadand mobile2000 SMOKE IDA ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/canada_2000inventorySMOKE 2.1 defaults February 2005CanadaPoint 2002 SMOKE IDAcreated byNYSDEC fromCanadian NPRIdatabasehttp://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/npri/npri_home_e.cfmSMOKE 2.1 defaults May 2005Mexico * Point, area,nonroad andmobile1999 SMOKE IDA EPA CAIR NODA SMOKE 2.1 defaults February 2005157 CHAPTER IX. REFERENCES

CAMD, 2004: 2002 Continuous Emissions Mon itoring Data Files downloaded on July 8, 2004

from the EPA’s Clean Air Markets Division’s website (www.epa.gov/ airm arkets). [Note: The files can be found by clicking on Data and Ma ps on the left panel of the screen, then on Data Sets and Published Reports, and then on the first item on the list, Emissions Data Prepackaged Datasets (http://cfpub.epa.gov/gdm/index.cfm?fuseaction= prepackaged.select). Year 2002 data for the quarterly time pe riod was selected and then “Display List” that provides 48 data sets (comma delimited text format) that were downloaded one by one and combined into a single dataset.]

EPA, 2002: Final Summary of the Development and Results of a Methodology for Calculating

Area Source Emissions from Re sidential Fuel Combustion, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and St andards. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 2002. (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/t echreport/volume03/index.html).

EPA, 2003a: Enhanced Particulate Matter Controll ed Emissions Calculator , User’s Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emissi on Factor and Inventory Group, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Divi sion, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 2003.

EPA, 2003b: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Documentation for Aircraft, Commerc ial Marine, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the Na tional Emissions Inventory, prepared by Eastern Research Group, Morrisville, NC, for the U.S. Envi ronmental Protection Agency, September 2003.

EPA, 2004a: Basic Format & Content Checker 3.0 (Formerly known as the Quality Assurance / Quality Control Software 3.0) - March 2004; Extended Quality Control Tool - Updated May 18, 2004. Available at the following EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/nif/index.html#nei.

EPA, 2004b: NEI Quality Assurance and Da ta Augmentation for Point Sources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, May 26, 2004.

EPA, 2004c: Factor Information and REtrieval (FIRE) Data System, Version 6.24, located on the Technology Transfer Network Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emission Factors Web Site at http://www.epa.gov /ttn/chief/softwar e/fire/index.html. March 2004.

EPA, 2005a. U.S. Environmental Protect ion Agency, Final NONROAD2005 [computer software], Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, MI. Available December 2005 at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nonroadmdl.htm.158 EPA, 2005b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Mobile Inventory Model, NMIM2005 [computer software], Office of Tr ansportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor,

MI. Available December 2005 at: h ttp://www.epa.gov/otaq/nmim.htm.

ERG, 2004: Environmental Research Group, Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Inventory, technical memorandum prepared by Eastern Re search Group, Morrisville, NC, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2004.

MANE-VU, 2003: Quality Assurance Plan for Development of a 2002 Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the MANE-VU States , Final. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/North east Visibility Uni on (MANE-VU). January 31, 2003.

MANE-VU, 2004a: Quality Assurance Projec t Plan (QAPP) for Area and Point Source Emissions Modeling Inventory Project, Fi nal. Prepared by E.H. Pechan &Associates, Inc. and Carolina Environmental Program for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). August 3, 2004.

MANE-VU, 2004b: Summary of Approaches Available for Fugitive Dust Sources, Final. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associ ates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). July 15, 2004.

MANE-VU, 2004c: Summary of Approaches Available for Wildfires, Prescribed Burning, Slash Burning, and Agricultural Fi eld Burning, Draft. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mi d-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). July 24, 2004.

MANE-VU, 2005: Area and Point Source Emissi ons Modeling Inventory Project, Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid- Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANEVU). January 31, 2005.

Thompson, 2002: Thompson, Rhonda L., “A Dem onstration of the Quality Assurance (QA) software specifically developed for the Nati onal Emission Inventory (NEI),” presented at the International Emission Inventory Confer ence “Emission Inventories - Partnering for the Future,” Atlanta, GA, April 15-18, 2002, (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/conference/ ei11/qa/thompson.pdf).

WRAP, 2005: Western Governors’ Association, Western Regional Air Partnership, “Analysis of

the Fine Fraction of Particulate Matter in Fugitive Dust,” Final Report, October 12, 2005 (http://www.wrapair.org/f orums/dejf/index.html).A-1 APPENDIX A

POINT SOURCE INVENTOR Y, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT

[ NOTE: The Appendix A table for ea ch State is provided in a separ ate MS Word file because of the large size of each table. The Word files ar e provided in the zip file named “Appendix A.zip”;

this zip file also includes an Excel Workbook file that contains the spreadsheet from which the Word file was created for each State.]B-1 APPENDIX B

AREA SOURCE INVENTOR Y, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT

[ NOTE: The Appendix B table for ea ch State is provided in a separ ate MS Word file because of the large size of each table. The Word files ar e provided in the zip file named “Appendix B.zip”;

this zip file also includes an Excel Workbook file that contains the spreadsheet from which the Word file was created for each State.]C-1 APPENDIX C

NONROAD SOURCE INVENT ORY, VERSION 3: FINAL COUNTY, MONTHLY NATIONAL

MOBILE INVENTORY MOD EL (NMIM) INPUTS

CONTENTS

CONNECTICUT .................................................................................................................... .... C-2

DELAWARE ....................................................................................................................... ....... C-2

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ...................................................................................................... C-3

MAINE .......................................................................................................................... ............. C-3

MARYLAND ....................................................................................................................... ...... C-4

MASSACHUSETTS.................................................................................................................. . C-6

NEW HAMPSHIRE .................................................................................................................. . C-7

NEW JERSEY ..................................................................................................................... ....... C-7

NEW YORK ....................................................................................................................... ........ C-9

PENNSYLVANIA................................................................................................................... . C-13

RHODE ISLAND ................................................................................................................... .. C-17

VERMONT........................................................................................................................ ....... C-18C-2Table C-1. MANE-VU County,Monthly NMIM/NONROAD InputsFIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC09CONNECTICUTRVP, psi001 Fairfield County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5003 Hartford County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3005 Litchfield County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3007 Middlesex County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3009 New Haven County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3011 New London County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3013 Tolland County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3015 Windham County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3Oxygen Weight Percent001 Fairfield County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172003 Hartford County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667005 Litchfield County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667007 Middlesex County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667009 New Haven County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667011 New London County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667013 Tolland County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667015 Windham County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Fairfield County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0003 Hartford County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0005 Litchfield County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0007 Middlesex County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0009 New Haven County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0011 New London County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0013 Tolland County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0015 Windham County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.010DELAWARERVP, psi001 Kent County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4003 New Castle County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4005 Sussex County 13.4 13.4 10.4 10.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 10.4 10.4 13.4Oxygen Weight Percent001 Kent County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442003 New Castle County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442005 Sussex County 1.4645 1.4645 1.5538 1.5538 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.5538 1.5538 1.4645Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Kent County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0003 New Castle County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0005 Sussex County 225.0 225.0 186.0 186.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 186.0 186.0 225.0Table C-1 (continued)C-3FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC11DISTRICT OF COLUMBIARVP, psi001 District of Columbia 13.1 13.1 10.4 10.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.4 13.1Oxygen Weight Percent001 District of Columbia 1.7681 1.7681 1.8217 1.8217 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8217 1.7681Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 District of Columbia 230.0 230.0 199.6 199.6 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 199.6 230.023MAINERVP, psi001 Androscoggin County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6003 Aroostook County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6005 Cumberland County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6007 Franklin County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6009 Hancock County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6011 Kennebec County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6013 Knox County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6015 Lincoln County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6017 Oxford County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6019 Penobscot County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6021 Piscataquis County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6023 Sagadahoc County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6025 Somerset County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6027 Waldo County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6029 Washington County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6031 York County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6Oxygen Weight Percent001 Androscoggin County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080003 Aroostook County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080005 Cumberland County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080007 Franklin County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080009 Hancock County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080011 Kennebec County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080013 Knox County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080015 Lincoln County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080017 Oxford County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080019 Penobscot County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080021 Piscataquis County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080023 Sagadahoc County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080025 Somerset County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080027 Waldo County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080029 Washington County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080031 York County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Androscoggin County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0003 Aroostook County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0005 Cumberland County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0007 Franklin County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0Table C-1 (continued)C-4FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC009 Hancock County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.023 MAINE (cont’d)011 Kennebec County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0013 Knox County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0015 Lincoln County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0017 Oxford County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0019 Penobscot County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0021 Piscataquis County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0023 Sagadahoc County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0025 Somerset County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0027 Waldo County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0029 Washington County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0031 York County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.024MARYLANDRVP, psi003 Anne Arundel County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6005 Baltimore County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6009 Calvert County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6011 Caroline County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6013 Carroll County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6015 Cecil County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6017 Charles County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6019 Dorchester County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6021 Frederick County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6023 Garrett County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6025 Harford County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6027 Howard County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6029 Kent County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6031 Montgomery County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6033 Prince George's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6035 Queen Anne's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6037 St. Mary's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6039 Somerset County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6041 Talbot County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6043 Washington County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6045 Wicomico County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6047 Worcester County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6510 Baltimore city 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6Oxygen Weight Percent001 Allegany County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075003 Anne Arundel County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075005 Baltimore County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075009 Calvert County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075011 Caroline County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075013 Carroll County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075015 Cecil County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075017 Charles County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075019 Dorchester County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075021 Frederick County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075Table C-1 (continued)C-5FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC023 Garrett County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.107524 MARYLAND (cont’d)025 Harford County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075027 Howard County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075029 Kent County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075031 Montgomery County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075033 Prince George's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075035 Queen Anne's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075037 St. Mary's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075039 Somerset County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075041 Talbot County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075043 Washington County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075045 Wicomico County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075047 Worcester County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075510 Baltimore city 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Allegany County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9003 Anne Arundel County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0005 Baltimore County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0009 Calvert County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0011 Caroline County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9013 Carroll County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0015 Cecil County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0017 Charles County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0019 Dorchester County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9021 Frederick County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0023 Garrett County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9025 Harford County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0027 Howard County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0029 Kent County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0031 Montgomery County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0033 Prince George's County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0035 Queen Anne's County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0037 St. Mary's County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9039 Somerset County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9041 Talbot County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9043 Washington County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9045 Wicomico County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9047 Worcester County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9510 Baltimore city 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0Table C-1 (continued)C-6FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC25MASSACHUSETTSRVP, psi001 Barnstable County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5003 Berkshire County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5005 Bristol County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5007 Dukes County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5009 Essex County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5011 Franklin County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5013 Hampden County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5015 Hampshire County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5017 Middlesex County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5019 Nantucket County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5021 Norfolk County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5023 Plymouth County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5025 Suffolk County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5027 Worcester County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5Oxygen Weight Percent001 Barnstable County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002003 Berkshire County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002005 Bristol County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002007 Dukes County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002009 Essex County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002011 Franklin County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002013 Hampden County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002015 Hampshire County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002017 Middlesex County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002019 Nantucket County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002021 Norfolk County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002023 Plymouth County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002025 Suffolk County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002027 Worcester County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Barnstable County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0003 Berkshire County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0005 Bristol County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0007 Dukes County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0009 Essex County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0011 Franklin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0013 Hampden County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0015 Hampshire County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0017 Middlesex County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0019 Nantucket County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0021 Norfolk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0023 Plymouth County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0025 Suffolk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0027 Worcester County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0Table C-1 (continued)C-7FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC33NEW HAMPSHIRERVP, psi001 Belknap County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6003 Carroll County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6005 Cheshire County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6007 Coos County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6009 Grafton County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6011 Hillsborough County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.76.7 10.2 10.2 12.9013 Merrimack County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9015 Rockingham County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9017 Strafford County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9019 Sullivan County 13.613.6 11.2 11.2 7.97.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6Oxygen Weight Percent001 Belknap County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786003 Carroll County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786005 Cheshire County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786007 Coos County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786009 Grafton County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786011 Hillsborough County 1.8217 1.8217 1.9110 1.9110 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.01822.0182 1.9110 1.9110 1.8217013 Merrimack County 1.8217 1.8217 1.9110 1.9110 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 1.9110 1.9110 1.8217015 Rockingham County 1.9825 1.9825 2.0539 2.0539 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.0539 2.0539 1.9825017 Strafford County 1.9825 1.9825 2.0539 2.0539 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.0539 2.0539 1.9825019 Sullivan County 0.17860.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.28580.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Belknap County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1003 Carroll County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1005 Cheshire County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1007 Coos County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1009 Grafton County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1011 Hillsborough County 121.0 121.0 101.3 101.3 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.075.0 101.3 101.3 121.0013 Merrimack County 121.0 121.0 101.3 101.3 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 101.3 101.3 121.0015 Rockingham County 148.0 148.0 121.0 121.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 121.0 121.0 148.0017 Strafford County 148.0 148.0 121.0 121.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 121.0 121.0 148.0019 Sullivan County 228.1228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.134NEW JERSEYRVP, psi001 Atlantic County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4003 Bergen County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5005 Burlington County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4007 Camden County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4009 Cape May County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4011 Cumberland County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4013 Essex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5015 Gloucester County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4017 Hudson County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5019 Hunterdon County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5021 Mercer County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4023 Middlesex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5Table C-1 (continued)C-8FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC34 NEW JERSEY025 Monmouth County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5(cont’d)027 Morris County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5029 Ocean County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5031 Passaic County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5033 Salem County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4035 Somerset County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5037 Sussex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5039 Union County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5041 Warren County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4Oxygen Weight Percent001 Atlantic County 1.6922 1.6922 1.8499 1.8499 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 1.8499 1.8499 1.6922003 Bergen County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172005 Burlington County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442007 Camden County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442009 Cape May County 1.6922 1.6922 1.8499 1.8499 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 1.8499 1.8499 1.6922011 Cumberland County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442013 Essex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172015 Gloucester County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442017 Hudson County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172019 Hunterdon County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172021 Mercer County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442023 Middlesex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172025 Monmouth County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172027 Morris County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172029 Ocean County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172031 Passaic County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172033 Salem County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442035 Somerset County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172037 Sussex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172039 Union County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172041 Warren County 1.8753 1.8753 1.9110 1.9110 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9110 1.9110 1.8753Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Atlantic County 207.0 207.0 174.0 174.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 174.0 174.0 207.0003 Bergen County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0005 Burlington County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0007 Camden County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0009 Cape May County 207.0 207.0 174.0 174.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 174.0 174.0 207.0011 Cumberland County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0013 Essex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0015 Gloucester County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0017 Hudson County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0019 Hunterdon County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0021 Mercer County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0023 Middlesex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0025 Monmouth County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0027 Morris County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0029 Ocean County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0031 Passaic County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0Table C-1 (continued)C-9FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC34 NEW JERSEY033 Salem County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0(cont’d)035 Somerset County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0037 Sussex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0039 Union County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0041 Warren County 125.0 125.0 123.7 123.7 122.0 122.0 122.0 122.0 122.0 123.7 123.7 125.036NEW YORKRVP, psi001 Albany County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4003 Allegany County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4005 Bronx County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5007 Broome County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4009 Cattaraugus County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4011 Cayuga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4013 Chautauqua County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4015 Chemung County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4017 Chenango County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4019 Clinton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4021 Columbia County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4023 Cortland County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4025 Delaware County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4027 Dutchess County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4029 Erie County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4031 Essex County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4033 Franklin County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4035 Fulton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4037 Genesee County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4039 Greene County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4041 Hamilton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4043 Herkimer County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4045 Jefferson County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4047 Kings County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5049 Lewis County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4051 Livingston County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4053 Madison County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4055 Monroe County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4057 Montgomery County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4059 Nassau County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5061 New York County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5063 Niagara County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4065 Oneida County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4067 Onondaga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4069 Ontario County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4071 Orange County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5073 Orleans County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4075 Oswego County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4077 Otsego County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4079 Putnam County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5081 Queens County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5Table C-1 (continued)C-10FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC36 NEW YORK083 Rensselaer County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4(cont’d)085 Richmond County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5087 Rockland County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5089 St. Lawrence County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4091 Saratoga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4093 Schenectady County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4095 Schoharie County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4097 Schuyler County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4099 Seneca County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4101 Steuben County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4103 Suffolk County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5105 Sullivan County 12.712.7 12.6 10.9 8.68.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4107 Tioga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4109 Tompkins County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4111 Ulster County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4113 Warren County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4115 Washington County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4117 Wayne County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4119 Westchester County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5121 Wyoming County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4123 Yates County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4Oxygen Weight Percent001 Albany County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930003 Allegany County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930005 Bronx County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431007 Broome County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930009 Cattaraugus County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965011 Cayuga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930013 Chautauqua County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965015 Chemung County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930017 Chenango County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930019 Clinton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930021 Columbia County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930023 Cortland County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930025 Delaware County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930027 Dutchess County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930029 Erie County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965031 Essex County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930033 Franklin County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930035 Fulton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930037 Genesee County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930039 Greene County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930041 Hamilton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930043 Herkimer County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930045 Jefferson County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930047 Kings County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431049 Lewis County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930051 Livingston County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930053 Madison County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930Table C-1 (continued)C-11FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC36 NEW YORK055 Monroe County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930(cont’d)057 Montgomery County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930059 Nassau County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431061 New York County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431063 Niagara County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965065 Oneida County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930067 Onondaga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930069 Ontario County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930071 Orange County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431073 Orleans County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930075 Oswego County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930077 Otsego County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930079 Putnam County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431081 Queens County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431083 Rensselaer County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930085 Richmond County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431087 Rockland County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431089 St. Lawrence County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930091 Saratoga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930093 Schenectady County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930095 Schoharie County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930097 Schuyler County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930099 Seneca County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930101 Steuben County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930103 Suffolk County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431105 Sullivan County 0.87511.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.89300.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930107 Tioga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930109 Tompkins County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930111 Ulster County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930113 Warren County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930115 Washington County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930117 Wayne County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930119 Westchester County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431121 Wyoming County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930123 Yates County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Albany County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0003 Allegany County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0005 Bronx County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0007 Broome County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0009 Cattaraugus County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0011 Cayuga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0013 Chautauqua County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0015 Chemung County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0017 Chenango County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0019 Clinton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0021 Columbia County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0023 Cortland County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0025 Delaware County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0Table C-1 (continued)C-12FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC36 NEW YORK027 Dutchess County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0(cont’d)029 Erie County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0031 Essex County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0033 Franklin County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0035 Fulton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0037 Genesee County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0039 Greene County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0041 Hamilton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0043 Herkimer County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0045 Jefferson County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0047 Kings County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0049 Lewis County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0051 Livingston County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0053 Madison County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0055 Monroe County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0057 Montgomery County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0059 Nassau County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0061 New York County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0063 Niagara County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0065 Oneida County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0067 Onondaga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0069 Ontario County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0071 Orange County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0073 Orleans County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0075 Oswego County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0077 Otsego County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0079 Putnam County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0081 Queens County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0083 Rensselaer County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0085 Richmond County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0087 Rockland County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0089 St. Lawrence County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0091 Saratoga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0093 Schenectady County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0095 Schoharie County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0097 Schuyler County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0099 Seneca County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0101 Steuben County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0103 Suffolk County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0105 Sullivan County 260.0250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0107 Tioga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0109 Tompkins County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0111 Ulster County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0113 Warren County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0115 Washington County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0117 Wayne County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0119 Westchester County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0121 Wyoming County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0123 Yates County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0Table C-1 (continued)C-13FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42PENNSYLVANIARVP, psi001 Adams County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5003 Allegheny County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5005 Armstrong County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5007 Beaver County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5009 Bedford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5011 Berks County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5013 Blair County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5015 Bradford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5017 Bucks County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5019 Butler County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5021 Cambria County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5023 Cameron County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5025 Carbon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5027 Centre County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5029 Chester County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5031 Clarion County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5033 Clearfield County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5035 Clinton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5037 Columbia County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5039 Crawford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5041 Cumberland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5043 Dauphin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5045 Delaware County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5047 Elk County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5049 Erie County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5051 Fayette County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5053 Forest County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5055 Franklin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5057 Fulton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5059 Greene County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5061 Huntingdon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5063 Indiana County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5065 Jefferson County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5067 Juniata County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5069 Lackawanna County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5071 Lancaster County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5073 Lawrence County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5075 Lebanon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5077 Lehigh County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5079 Luzerne County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5081 Lycoming County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5083 McKean County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5085 Mercer County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5087 Mifflin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5089 Monroe County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5091 Montgomery County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5093 Montour County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5Table C-1 (continued)C-14FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42 PENNSYLVANIA095 Northampton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5(cont’d)097 Northumberland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5099 Perry County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5101 Philadelphia County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5103 Pike County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5105 Potter County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5107 Schuylkill County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.78.7 11.0 11.0 13.5109 Snyder County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5111 Somerset County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5113 Sullivan County 13.513.5 11.0 11.0 8.78.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5115 Susquehanna County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5117 Tioga County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5119 Union County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5121 Venango County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5123 Warren County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5125 Washington County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5127 Wayne County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5129 Westmoreland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5131 Wyoming County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5133 York County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5Oxygen Weight Percent001 Adams County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965003 Allegheny County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965005 Armstrong County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965007 Beaver County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965009 Bedford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965011 Berks County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965013 Blair County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965015 Bradford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965017 Bucks County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303019 Butler County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965021 Cambria County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965023 Cameron County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965025 Carbon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965027 Centre County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965029 Chester County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303031 Clarion County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965033 Clearfield County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965035 Clinton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965037 Columbia County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965039 Crawford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965041 Cumberland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965043 Dauphin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965045 Delaware County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303047 Elk County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965049 Erie County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965051 Fayette County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965053 Forest County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965055 Franklin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965Table C-1 (continued)C-15FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42 PENNSYLVANIA057 Fulton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965(cont’d)059 Greene County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965061 Huntingdon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965063 Indiana County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965065 Jefferson County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965067 Juniata County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965069 Lackawanna County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965071 Lancaster County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965073 Lawrence County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965075 Lebanon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965077 Lehigh County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965079 Luzerne County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965081 Lycoming County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965083 McKean County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965085 Mercer County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965087 Mifflin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965089 Monroe County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965091 Montgomery County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303093 Montour County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965095 Northampton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965097 Northumberland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965099 Perry County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965101 Philadelphia County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303103 Pike County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965105 Potter County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965107 Schuylkill County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.26790.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965109 Snyder County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965111 Somerset County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965113 Sullivan County 0.19650.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.26790.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965115 Susquehanna County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965117 Tioga County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965119 Union County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965121 Venango County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965123 Warren County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965125 Washington County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965127 Wayne County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965129 Westmoreland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965131 Wyoming County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965133 York County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Adams County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0003 Allegheny County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0005 Armstrong County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0007 Beaver County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0009 Bedford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0011 Berks County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0013 Blair County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0015 Bradford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0017 Bucks County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0Table C-1 (continued)C-16FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42 PENNSYLVANIA019 Butler County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0(cont’d)021 Cambria County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0023 Cameron County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0025 Carbon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0027 Centre County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0029 Chester County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0031 Clarion County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0033 Clearfield County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0035 Clinton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0037 Columbia County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0039 Crawford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0041 Cumberland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0043 Dauphin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0045 Delaware County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0047 Elk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0049 Erie County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0051 Fayette County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0053 Forest County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0055 Franklin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0057 Fulton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0059 Greene County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0061 Huntingdon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0063 Indiana County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0065 Jefferson County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0067 Juniata County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0069 Lackawanna County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0071 Lancaster County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0073 Lawrence County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0075 Lebanon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0077 Lehigh County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0079 Luzerne County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0081 Lycoming County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0083 McKean County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0085 Mercer County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0087 Mifflin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0089 Monroe County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0091 Montgomery County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0093 Montour County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0095 Northampton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0097 Northumberland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0099 Perry County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0101 Philadelphia County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0103 Pike County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0105 Potter County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0107 Schuylkill County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0109 Snyder County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0111 Somerset County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0113 Sullivan County 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0115 Susquehanna County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0Table C-1 (continued)C-17FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC42 PENNSYLVANIA117 Tioga County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0(cont’d)119 Union County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0121 Venango County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0123 Warren County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0125 Washington County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0127 Wayne County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0129 Westmoreland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0131 Wyoming County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0133 York County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.044RHODE ISLANDRVP, psi001 Bristol County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5003 Kent County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5005 Newport County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5007 Providence County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5009 Washington County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5Oxygen Weight Percent001 Bristol County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110003 Kent County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110005 Newport County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110007 Providence County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110009 Washington County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Bristol County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0003 Kent County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0005 Newport County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0007 Providence County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0009 Washington County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0Table C-1 (continued)C-18FIPS_State State FIPS_County County JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC50VERMONTRVP, psi001 Addison County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5003 Bennington County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5005 Caledonia County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5007 Chittenden County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5009 Essex County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5011 Franklin County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5013 Grand Isle County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5015 Lamoille County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.58.5 9.5 9.5 9.5017 Orange County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5019 Orleans County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5021 Rutland County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5023 Washington County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5025 Windham County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5027 Windsor County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5Oxygen Weight Percent001 Addison County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786003 Bennington County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786005 Caledonia County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786007 Chittenden County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786009 Essex County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786011 Franklin County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786013 Grand Isle County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786015 Lamoille County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.26790.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786017 Orange County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786019 Orleans County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786021 Rutland County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786023 Washington County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786025 Windham County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786027 Windsor County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786Gasoline Sulfur, ppm001 Addison County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3003 Bennington County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3005 Caledonia County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3007 Chittenden County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3009 Essex County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3011 Franklin County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3013 Grand Isle County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3015 Lamoille County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3017 Orange County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3019 Orleans County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3021 Rutland County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3023 Washington County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3025 Windham County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3027 Windsor County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3