alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

High-Tech Launderette LLC 

Under Contract No. IRW 17-089 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 62259 

Mrs. Nanhui Merritt 

Owner 

Scott N. Flesch, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Abraham Young, JA 

Trial Attorney 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL ON GOVERNMENT'S 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 

The government moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction this appeal from an 

August 12, 2019 notice that the government would terminate appellant's concession 

contract effective November 12, 2019 (R4, tab 6). Appellant (1) asks that the Board 

order the government to "immediately cease and desist their cancellation action," and 

(2) claims "approximately $150,000" in monetary relief (Notice of Appeal at 2). 

Appellant's October 28, 2019 claim to the contracting officer requests a monetary 

amount "estimated to be in excess of $150,000.00," in breach damages consisting of"a 

minimum of $150,000.00 in lost revenue." (R4, tab 11) The government says that we 

lack jurisdiction because (1) the "cease and desist" request is one for injunctive relief, 

and (2) appellant has not claimed a "sum certain." 

We agree with the government on both counts. The "cease and desist" request 

is one for injunctive relief that we do not possess jurisdiction to entertain. Cf Puma 

Energy Honduras, S.A. De C. V., ASBCA No. 61966, 2020 WL 741650 (Jan. 14, 2020) 

(request that the Board declare that a contract was still valid and in place and that 

appellant may deliver fuel to the government was request for injunctive relief; no 

jurisdiction). The monetary request is for a qualified amount, and, therefore, not a 

"sum certain"; consequently, we do not possess jurisdiction to entertain that request. 

Cf Joseph Sottolano, ASBCA No. 59777, 15-1 BCA ~ 35,970 at 175,735 (claim for 

"approximately $11,000" was not one for a sum certain; no jurisdiction); Sandoval 

Plumbing Repair, Inc., ASBCA No. 54640, 05-2 BCA ~ 33,072 at 163,933 (claim for 

"no less than $1,072,957.05" was not a sum certain; no jurisdiction); Godwin Equip., 
Inc., ASBCA No. 53462, 02-1 BCA ,r 31,674 at 156,530 (claim for damages stated as 

"in excess of' $5,000,000 was not one for a sum certain; no jurisdiction). 

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

Dated: February 26, 2020 

I concur 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

n'MoTHYP.MLMAI 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

0 

~~----

NC. WILSON 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62259, Appeal of High-Tech 

Launderette LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. > -

Dated: 

2 

PAULLAK. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Michael Christopher SHEELEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2764

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              74
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4800
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1225
<INVENTORY>                                         46
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4230
<PP&E>                                           51578
<DEPRECIATION>                                   43406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5828
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           459
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        6462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     12749
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17290
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    16240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  99
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1046
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)
 (Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Richard Nathan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.
   
 /s/ Richard
      NathanChief
      Executive Officer
                Innovative
      Card Technologies, Inc
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Annual Report of Tri-Tech Holding Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2010 the Report), I, Peter Dong, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 24, 2010 |  | /s/    Peter Dong      
|               |  | Peter Dong             
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Desmond Ross, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Solar Power Corp (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the fiscal Year ended June 30, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Desmond RossName:Desmond RossTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:October 20, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
UNDER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of CPFL Energia S.A. (the Company)
does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
  information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |                            | 
|------------------- | -------------------------- | 
|                    | /s/ Wilson Ferreira Junior | 
|                    |                            | 
|Date: June 29, 2009 | Wilson Ferreira Junior     | 
|                    | Chief Executive Officer    | 

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis G. Dracup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 12, 2006



/s/ Dennis G. DracupDennis G. DracupChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
**Exhibit
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      John
      S. Wittler, Chief Financial Officer, of Organa Technologies Group, Inc. (the
      "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      April 14, 2008




By:
                /s/ John S. WittlerChief
                Financial Officer
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 18, 2014

Nos. 04-14-00136-CR, 04-14-00137-CR, 04-14-00138-CR, & 04-14-00139-CR

Billy Edward GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 12-CR-611, 12-CR-615-CR, 12-CR-613, & 12-CR-609

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court imposed the sentences in Appeal Nos. 04-14-00136-CR, 04-14-00138-CR, and 04-14-

00139-CR on October 30, 2013, and signed the order being appealed in Appeal No. 04-14-00137-CR on

October 31, 2013. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Because appellant did not file a timely 

motion for new trial, the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was November 29, 2014, for Appeal Nos. 04-

14-00136-CR, 04-14-00138-CR, and 04-14-00139-CR, and December 2, 2014, for Appeal No. 04-14-00137-

CR. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal was not filed until February 25, 2014, and the record 

shows it was not mailed until February 18, 2104, and appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to 

file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. 

We therefore order appellant to file a written response on or before April 17, 2014 showing cause 

why these appeals should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke court of appeals’

jurisdiction). If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeals will be 

dismissed. If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to show jurisdiction, appellant must ask the trial court 

clerk to prepare one and must notify the clerk of this court that such a request was made. 

We order all deadlines in this matter suspended until further order of the court. We further order the 

clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the court reporter. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 

18th day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Nina R. KOHLER, n/k/a Nina R. Taylor, Appellant, v. Stephen M. KOHLER, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2133

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting. 

*Time and Date:*                         2 p.m.-5 p.m., April 30, 2009 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Strengthening Infectious Disease Research Capacity for Public Health Action in Guatemala and Central America, FOA GH09-001.”                     

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Maurine F. Goodman, M.A., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, Office of the Director, Office of the Chief Science Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D74, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-4640.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: March 20, 2009. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 [FR Doc. E9-6990 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Darrell L. POOLE, a/k/a Darrell Lee Poole, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4345

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31  Certification


I, John A. Dugan, Chairman, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SFG Financial
Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, and results of operations of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to insure that
          material information relating to the registrant is made known to us,
          particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
          prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report the (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.I have disclosed based upon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the registrant's board of directors:

     a)   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the auditor's any material weaknesses in internal
          controls; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material that involves management or others
          who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other director and I have indicated in this quarterly report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect changes in internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated: 10/24/2005                              /s/ John A. Dugan
                                               -------------------------
                                               John A. Dugan
                                               Chairman/CEO, Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 16, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig, seconded by Director Mick Mulvaney (Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), and concurred in by Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii) and (c)(9)(B).

Dated: January 16, 2018.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-00905 Filed 1-16-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
K.G., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.