alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARY

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
of the date hereof (the Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2006



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                       
|E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                           
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rio de Janeiro Rome San Francisco São Paulo Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jakarta Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com \\DC - 082908/000003 - 5674853 v1 Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 T +1 202 637 5600 F +1 202 637 5910 www.hoganlovells.com

May 23, 2014

By Electronic Mail
Mr. Robert J. Finamore Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
Re: Application of China Southern Airlines Company Limited for an Exemp tion and an Amended Foreign Air Carrier Permit (Docket DOT-OST-1996-2008)
Dear Mr. Finamore: We have polled the U.S. air carrier representatives served with the above-referenced application filed on May 21, 2014, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought therein. Sincerely,

Jonathan Echmalian Transportation Specialist jonathan.echmalian@hoganlovells.com D +1.202.637.5439
cc: George U. Carneal Lu Wei Xi robert.wirick@aa.com; howard.kass@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; chris.walker@delta.com; gbleopard@fedex.com; sllunsford@fedex.com; jhill@cooley.com; perkmann@cooley.com; matwood@cozen.com; kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com; agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com; dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com; anita.mosner@hklaw.com; jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com
A. S., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond LONG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50149.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*760Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Andrew G. Brown, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Frank Duncan, Esq., Raymond Long, Los Angeles, CA, Vicki Marolt Buchanan, Esq., Newport Beach, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Raymond Long appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 262 month sentence for distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Long has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Long has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government has not filed a brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as the Principal Financial Officer of Energy Partners, Ltd. (the Company), that the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in
such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Tiffany J. Thom                                         
|Tiffany J. Thom                                             
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                               

Dated: November 4,
2010



29
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

Petitioner,

v.

GRACE BADOLATO KILCHENSTEIN

Respondent.

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG

No.-

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed

herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, and Respondent's acknowledgment therein that

sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that she committed professional misconduct

in violation of Rules 1.15,5.3,5.5(a) and 8.4(a), (b), and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers'

Rules of Professional Conduct, in effect at the time of the misconduct, it is this day

of ,2018,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Grace Badolato Kilchenstein, be and she is hereby

indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Grace Badolato

Kilchenstein from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall

certiff that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and

all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Senior Judge

September Term, 20
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 2 0 6 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. R O B E R T L E S L I E B A Y S , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 4 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 1 5

- 1 0

B e f o r e J O L L Y , O W E N , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t R o b e r t L e s l i e B a y s h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 1 )

. B a y s h a s n o t f

i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f a n d t h e r e l e v a n t
p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f l e c t e d t h e r e i n
. W e c o n c u r w i t h c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t
t h a t t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w
. A c c o r d i n g l y ,
c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 19 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10206 Document: 00511450164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 2 0 6

f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-10206 Document: 00511450164 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 2 0

- 0577

_________________ STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. RUSSELL KORTAN,

Defendant and Appellant

. O R D E R

_________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the opening brief of Russell Kortan, electronically filed on February 1 8 , 2022, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the below

-referenced Rule s and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 12(1) requires the brief contain certain sections under appropriate headings and in the order indicated in Rule 12. Specifically, M. R. App. P. (12)(1)(c) requires a statement of the case that shall briefly indicate the nature of the case and its procedural disposition below while M. R. App. P. 12(1)(d) separately requires a statement of facts relevant to the issues presented for review. The sections of Appellant’s brief do not meet the requirements of M. R. App. P. 12(1). M. R. App. P. 12(1)(f) requires a summary of the argument before the argument portion of the brief. The summary of the argument should include a heading identifying it
as a separate section. The summary should be a clear and concise statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief. Appellant’s brief does not include a summary of the argument. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(i) requires an appendix to include its own table of contents. The appendix of Appellant’s brief does not contain its own table of contents. 02/18/2022

Case Number: DA 20-05772

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the A ppellant shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court this brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule s and that Appellant shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes , additions, or deletions other than those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to Appellant and to all parties of record.

Electronically signed by: Dirk Sandefur Justice, Montana Supreme Court February 18 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          374683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1346244
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    1257425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3188646
<PP&E>                                         1572483
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5613030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2014334
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          9392
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5613030
<SALES>                                        2434458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2437809
<CGS>                                          1604437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2337939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 45966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               45966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  53904
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (857)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              54761
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     54761
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Dean Wicker, the Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer of Newsearch, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY,
that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
          March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 28th day of October, 2004.


                                            By:  /s/  Dean Wicker
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Dean Wicker,
                                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Newsearch, Inc. and will be retained by Newsearch, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.49

 

LICENSE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

 

Inasmuch as NewLink Genetics Corporation of Ames, Iowa, and the Medical College of Georgia Research Institute of Augusta Georgia, have a valid and existing License Agreement related to the use of  Indoleamine-2,3-Dioxygenase and its inhibitors in Immuno-regulation [*] dated September 13, 2005;

 

and

 

Inasmuch as the parties agree that the License Agreement contains a provision (Section 4.1) for the acquisition of new, related Improvement Technologies by NewLink arising at MCGRI after the Agreement was signed

 

and

 

Inasmuch as the NewLink has reviewed a new Improvement Technology [*], and wishes to exercise its option to incorporate this technology into the existing License Agreement technology portfolio under its standard royalty terms and use conditions,

 

It is Agreed:

 

That the parties amend the License Agreement relative to its Exhibit A , such that MCG case [*] is to be included in the technology portfolio for development and commercialization by NewLink, effective the date that the License Fee of [*] is received at MCGRI.  All Payments due to the [*] will be coordinated by MCGRI according to the terms stated in [*].

 

This present amendment shall hereby be considered part of the original License Agreement and is hereto agreed by representatives of both parties signing below.

 

 

	
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    	
 
    	
 
    	
NEWLINK GENETICS
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By
    	
/s/Betty Aldridge
    	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/Nicholas N. Vahanian
    
	
Name:
    	
Betty Aldridge
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Nicholas N. Vahanian
    
	
Title:
    	
Executive Director
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief Medical and Operations Officer
    
	
Date:
    	
2/13/07
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Date:    2/6/07
Network Equipment TechnologiesFiscal 2006 Q2, Q3, Q4 Executive Bonus Plan

This Executive Bonus Plan is a subplan to the company-wide Fiscal 2006 Q2, Q3, Q4 Bonus Plan.

Eligible participants:  All Executives in the Company who are not on a sales quota or other commission-based compensation plan, and who are on active payroll status at least 50% of the quarter in which payment is made.

Form and Timing of Payment:  Participant must be an active payroll employee of net.com on the official date of payment in order to receive an award.  Payments will be distributed quarterly in the month following the end of the fiscal quarter.

Company objectives:  The bonus plan is based on three important Company objectives:  total revenue, VoIP revenue, and profitability.

Base bonus amounts:  The plan establishes three levels of achievement for each of the three key objectives:  Gold, Silver, and Bronze. Achievement of the bonus for each objective is independent from achievement of the others. Depending on the achievement level for each objective, participants will receive a bonus payment as a percentage of quarterly salary. The bonus payment will be adjusted by a factor, depending on position level. The factor for this Executive Bonus Plan is 2.5.

|Achievement Level | Percent of quarterly salary | Total possible base bonus
|----------------- | --------------------------- | -------------------------
|                  | Total Rev.                  | VoIP Rev.                
|Gold              | 3%                          | 3%                       
|Silver            | 2%                          | 2%                       
|Bronze            | 1%                          | 1%                       

Example:  If the Total Revenue objective is Gold, and the VoIP objective is Bronze and the Profitability objective is Silver, then the base bonus would be 6% (3 + 1 + 2) times the factor.

Bonus Targets:  The bonus levels for each of the objectives are determined by the dollar amount that actual achievement for a quarter exceeds the base amounts approved separately by the Board of Directors (it should be noted that Net Income numbers are before bonus and are exclusive of restructure charges):

|              | Q2      | Q3      | Q4     
|------------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|Gold          |         |         |        
|VOIP Revenue  | + 2,400 | + 3,550 | + 5,901
|Total Revenue | + 3,600 | + 5,725 | + 9,274
|Net Income    | + 2,320 | + 3,322 | + 5,427
|              |         |         |        
|Silver        |         |         |        
|VOIP Revenue  | + 1,550 | + 2,250 | + 3,850
|Total Revenue | + 2,400 | + 3,400 | + 5,300
|Net Income    | + 1,400 | + 2,100 | + 3,100
|              |         |         |        
|Bronze        |         |         |        
|VOIP Revenue  | + 750   | + 750   | + 750  
|Total Revenue | + 1,200 | + 1,200 | + 1,200
|Net Income    | + 716   | + 808   | + 854
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0896 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 070 - AD Helicopter Model: Various restricted category Model HH - 1K, TH - 1F, TH - 1L , UH - 1A, UH - 1B, UH - 1E, UH - 1F, UH - 1H, UH - 1L , and UH - 1P Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 25 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect an edge void, corrosion, or a crack on a main rotor blade, whi ch could lead to loss of the main rotor blade and subsequent loss o f control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 121,875 Labor per Helicopter ( 1 x $ 8 5 /work- hour per main rotor blade inspection) (24 x $85/work - hour per main rotor blade replacement $ 85 per main rotor blade per inspection cycle $2,040 O ther (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $85 per main rotor blade per inspection cycle $123,915 per main rotor blade replacement Total US Fleet Cost $ 2,125 per blade per inspection cycle Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Michael Kohner
# Official Journal L 49/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 49 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6525 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 49

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6525 February 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/328 of 25 February 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/328 of 25 February 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.