alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2018-3005]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM), as a part 
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the 
proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995. Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or 
electronically.
    This form is used by insurance brokers to register with Export-
Import Bank. It provides EXIM staff with the information necessary to 
make a determination of the eligibility of the broker to receive 
commission payments under Export-Import Bank's credit insurance 
programs.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 20, 2018 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB 92-79) or by mail to Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 
3048-0024. Form can be viewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib92-79.pdf.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-79 Broker Registration Form.
    OMB Number: 3048-0024.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This form is used by insurance brokers to register 
with Export Import Bank. The form provides EXIM staff with the 
information necessary to make a determination of the eligibility of the 
broker to receive commission payments under Export Import Bank's credit 
insurance programs.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities engaged in brokering 
export credit insurance policies.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 17.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Once every three years.
    Annual Public Burden: 4.25 hours.

Government Expenses

    Reviewing Time/Hours: 2.
    Responses per Year: 17.
    Review Time per Year: 34 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.5.
    Wages per Year: $1,445.
    Benefits & Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $1,734.

Bassam Doughman,
IT Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2018-00891 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Housing Programs Ltd. (the "Partnership"), forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
L.S., the father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3631

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 2, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEBBIE TAKATA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

HARTFORD COMPREHENSIVE

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE

COMPANY, a foreign corporation;

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, a

foreign corporation; BATTELLE

MEMORIAL INSTITUTE EMPLOYEES

LONG TERM DISABILITY BENEFITS

PLAN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-35927

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-05068-RMP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Rosanna Malouf Peterson, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 8, 2014

Seattle, Washington

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

FILED

MAY 08 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Debbie Takata appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment

in favor of defendants in her action under the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001–1461. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 

Hartford terminated Takata’s disability benefits after it recorded surveillance

videos showing Takata engaging in activities, such as teaching martial arts classes,

that were inconsistent with her statements and reported symptoms. 

1. Takata did not produce any evidence to rebut defendants’ declarations that

Hartford (not Battelle) administered her plan, even though she had been given the

opportunity to conduct discovery on the matter. Therefore, there was no conflict of

interest and we accordingly apply the deferential abuse of discretion standard of

review to Hartford’s termination decision.

2. Given the video, Hartford’s failure to provide detailed reasons

distinguishing its benefits decision from that of the Social Security Administration

does not compel a conclusion that Hartford abused its discretion. See, e.g.,

Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 588 F.3d 623, 635 (9th Cir. 2009).

3. Hartford’s initial denial letter implicitly notified Takata that a physician’s

recitation of her reported symptoms would not be sufficient for Hartford to reverse

its initial termination of benefits. Takata, moreover, to this day has still not

2
presented objective medical evidence demonstrating the extent of her disability,

even though she without question had the opportunity to do so in this appeal. See

Saffon v. Wells Fargo & Co. Long Term Disability Plan, 522 F.3d 863, 872 (9th

Cir. 2008). Therefore, Hartford did not violate 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1(g)(1)(iii).

AFFIRMED.

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000748901
<NAME>                                            PS PARTNERS IV, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                                      U.S. $
       
<S>                                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                      1
<CASH>                                                       2,168,000
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   80,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             2,248,000
<PP&E>                                                      60,806,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (23,026,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              60,114,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        1,205,000
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  19,728,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                60,114,000
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             3,265,000
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                1,173,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               602,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                534,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            534,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   534,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     3.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     3.74

        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE OF UNION 69, LTD. AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND THE RELATED  STATEMENTS  OF
OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE  MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Kirwan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date:  April 14, 2004 |  | 
|--------------------- |  | 
|                      |  | 
|                      |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fischer Imaging Corporation and will be retained by Fischer Imaging Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
James A. WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4979

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
odfl-ex1018_6.htm



Exhibit 10.18.15

 

OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION STRUCTURE

EFFECTIVE AS OF THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 


					
	
Director Role
	
 
	
Annual Cash
Retainer
	
 
	
Annual Restricted

Stock Grant Amount

	
Member (all non-employee directors)
	
 
	
$90,000
	
 
	
$157,000

	
Lead Independent Director
	
 
	
25,000
	
(1)
	
—

	
Audit Committee Chair
	
 
	
25,000
	
(1)
	
—

	
Compensation Committee Chair
	
 
	
20,000
	
(1)
	
—

	
Governance and Nomination Committee Chair
	
 
	
15,000
	
(1)
	
—




 

(1)  Each non-employee Chair of a Board Committee and the Lead Independent Director receives this annual retainer in addition to the $90,000 annual cash retainer paid to all non-employee directors.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 14, 2014

NO. 03

- 12

- 00657

- CV

Longhorn Village, Appellant

v.

Kathleen Yesian, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on September 27, 2012. Longhorn

Vil lage has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having reviewed the record, the Court

agrees that the appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses

the appeal

. Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by tha t party , both in this Court and

the court below.
Wayne JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-515

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0497. VICTOR HODGES v. THE STATE.

A jury found Victor Hodges guilty of malice murder, robbery, and aggravated

assault, and the trial court sentenced Hodges to life imprisonment. Hodges filed a

motion for new trial, which the trial court denied, and Hodges filed this direct appeal.

Hodges has filed a motion to transfer the case to the Supreme Court.

Under our Constitution, the SupremeCourt has appellate jurisdiction over “[a]ll

cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” Ga. Const. of

1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be imposed for the

crime of malice murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See OCGA §

16-5-1 (a), (e) (1); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012) (Hunstein,

C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524, 524 (1) (322 SE2d 711)

(1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a sentence of death or

of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of murder”).

Accordingly, Hodges’s motion to transfer is GRANTED and this appeal is

hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

November 14, 2019

11/14/2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 24, 2018.

# PLACE:

Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

Commissioner Piwowar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session.

The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:

Settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: January 17, 2018.

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-01164 Filed 1-18-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE: No. 08

- 18

- 00177

- CR

§

SHERIFF RICHARD WILES,

RELATOR. §

§

§ AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Jesus Herrera, Judge of the County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 of El Paso, Texas

and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. We

therefore order the trial c ourt to vacate that portion of its bond order directing Sheriff Wiles to

disregard the ICE hold and release Victor Reyes

- Landeros to the street, in accordance with the

opinion of this Court. The writ will issue should the trial court fail to comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


            In connection with the Quarterly Report of QNB Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas J. Bisko, President and CEO,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.



                                                  /s/ Thomas J. Bisko
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  President and CEO

 Date:   August 13, 2002
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westbridge Research Group (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christine Koenemann, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.




Date: October 15, 2009                         By: /s/ Christine Koenemann
                                                   ----------------------------
                                               Christine Koenemann
                                               Principal Executive Officer
                                               Principal Financial Officer