alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS QTR. SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
BALANCE SHEET  AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,145
<PP&E>                                       1,597,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,599,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,257
<OTHER-SE>                                    (199,167)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,597,290
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (181,266)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                (181,266)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (237,584)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with
the Annual Report of Uranium Star Corp.  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J A Kirk McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:  March 21, 2007

/s/ J A Kirk McKinnon

J A Kirk McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer



---

---
M. Lynn POPE, f/n/a M. Lynn Bikowitz, appellant, v. Paul W. BIKOWITZ, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-201

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40864

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL REYES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-96-CR-92

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Raul Reyes appeals his conviction for possession of

marijuana with intent to distribute on the ground that the

district court clearly erred by denying his motion to suppress

evidence. We have reviewed the evidence and the briefs of the

parties and find no error in the denial of the motion to

suppress. See United States v. Casteneda, 951 F.2d 44, 47-48

(5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.
Timothy ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2426

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN the INTEREST OF Z.Y., a child.

M.L., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-5489

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1234 

To apply the Freedom of Information Act to actions and decisions of the 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information 

in carrying out the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LEE, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. WICKER, Mr. YOUNG, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. JOHNSON) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To apply the Freedom of Information Act to actions and 

decisions of the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Communications and Information in carrying out the 

Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Broadband Buildout 

5 Accountability Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1234 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF FOIA TO THE BROADBAND EQ2 UITY, ACCESS, AND DEPLOYMENT PROGRAM. 

3 Section 60102(o)(2) of the Infrastructure Investment 

4 and Jobs Act (47 U.S.C. 1702(o)(2)) is amended by in5 serting after ‘‘Act’)’’ the following: ‘‘, except for section 

6 552 of that title (commonly referred to as the ‘Freedom 

7 of Information Act’)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Richard C. MANNING, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and State of Florida, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2249

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 12, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 12.2**

** **

I, Michel G. Cayouette, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of TelesatHoldings Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the companyand have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors andthe audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  February 26, 2013
ex10-1_100711.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 



FIRST AMENDMENT


 


TO THE


 


FAIRPORT SAVINGS BANK


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT


AGREEMENT


DATED JULY 30, 2010


FOR


KEVIN MARONEY







THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is entered into this 7th day of October, 2011, by and between FAIRPORT SAVINGS BANK (the “Bank”), a savings association located in Fairport, New York, and KEVIN MARONEY (the “Executive”).







WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive executed the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement on July 30, 2010 (the “Agreement”);







WHEREAS, Article 8.1 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be amended upon mutual consent of the parties thereto; and







WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Agreement for the purpose of increasing the Normal Retirement Benefit from Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) to Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000);







NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the Bank and the Executive as follows:


Article 2.1.1 of the Agreement shall be amended and replaced as follows:







2.1.1  Amount of Benefit. The annual benefit under this Section 2.1 is Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000).







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment as of the date indicated above.








	
EXECUTIVE:

	  	
BANK:


	  	  	
FAIRPORT SAVINGS BANK


	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	
/s/ Kevin Maroney

	  	
/s/ Dana C. Gavenda


	
Kevin Maroney

	  	
By:  Dana C. Gavenda


	  	  	
Title:  President and CEO
Daniel J. MATOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
# CE2004065EN.01026101.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/261 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/261

---

(2004/C 65 E/275)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3034/03

by Marianne Thyssen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 October 2003)

Subject:   Term of patents for computer-implemented inventions

Subject:

At the sitting of 24 September 2003 Parliament voted at first reading on the proposal for a directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions.

Pursuant to Article 8(b) of the proposal, as amended by Parliament, the Commission is required to submit to Parliament and the Council a report on the issue of whether the rules governing the term of patents and the determination of patentability requirements, and more specifically novelty, inventive step and the proper scope of claims, are adequate.

Can the Commission state whether it regards the standard patent term (20 years) as suitable for software-related inventions? Does the Commission not regard a shorter period as desirable for this kind of high-technology invention? Does the Commission not take the view that such a decision might foster competition on the European market in software-related inventions?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

(18 November 2003)

It is a long-standing feature of patent law that the term of protection is the same for all inventions, in all fields of technology. This principle has been enshrined as a firm legal obligation at the international level in the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. The only deviation from this rule currently practised is to allow for an increased term of protection for certain products which are subject to lengthy regulatory approval procedures and which would therefore be subject, in the absence of such a provision, to a relatively short period of effective protection in the marketplace.

Nevertheless, the Commission is aware of arguments to the effect that the standard term of protection of 20 years is not appropriate for all fields of technology, and for this reason has agreed, in its response to the amendments made at first reading to the proposal, to examine the question. This examination would naturally take account of the need to encourage innovation and competition. It must, however, be appreciated that there would be considerable legal and technical challenges involved in making any change in this area, not the least of which is the practical difficulty in defining, in sufficiently precise and watertight legal terms, the boundaries of the subject-matter to which different terms of protection might be applied. Moreover, even if it should be concluded that it is desirable and feasible to make such a change, for the reasons mentioned above, this would need to be pursued as a policy objective through international negotiations.

---
William WEATHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-229

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

**Maxus      Realty Trust, Inc.**

**104      Armour Road**

**North      Kansas City, Missouri 64116**

----

**SECOND        AMENDED OPTIONAL STOCK DIVIDEND PLAN**

**1.**
**Participants:        Agency; Application of Cash Dividends and Voluntary Contributions.**

----

**2.**
**Risk        of Market Price Fluctuations**

**3.**
**Proxy        Matters**

**4.**
**Statements        of Account**

**5.**
**Administration        Fees**

----

**6.**
**No        Checks or Drafts**

**7.**
**Income        Taxes. **

**8.**
**Termination**

**9.**
**Stock        Dividends; Rights Offerings**

----

**10.**
**Trust        and AST Liabilities**

**11.**
**Participant        Change of Address; Notices**

**12.**
**Amendment**

**13.**
**Choice        of Law**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0342

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JEREMY CHRISTOPHER HOLMQUIST,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 29, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 21 2023

02/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0342
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Chairman's Perspective, (5) Project Proposal Presentations, (6) Vote on Projects if time permits, (7) Next Agenda.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on April 16, 2009 from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Pine Room, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Randy Jero, Committee Coordinator, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Randy Jero, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. (530) 934-3316; E-mail                         *rjero@fed.us*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by April 13, 2009 will have the opportunity to address the Committee at those sessions.

Dated: April 6, 2009.

Eduardo Olmedo,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. E9-8242 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. L E O R I C K E Y E V A N S , a . k. a . L e m on H ea d, a. k. a. P aper , D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 50463 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 0 -cr-0 0 9 2 3 -S JO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T R O T T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L e o R ic k e yE v an s ap p e a ls f r o m h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n an d1 9 2 - m o n th s e n te n c e f

o rR a c k e te e rI n f

lu e n c e dan dC o rrup t O r g an iz a tio n s c o n s p ir a c y , in v io la tio n o f

1 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 6 2 ( d ) ; an dc o n s p ir a c yto p o s s e s s w ith in te n t to 

# FI LED NO V 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50463 2 di stribu t e atl ea stfi ve gram s of c ocai ne base , i n v i ol at i on of 21 U . S . C . §§ 84 1(a) , ( b) ( 1) ( A ) , and 846. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), E v an s ’s c o u n s e l h a s f

ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th e r e ar e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d E vans w i th the opportuni tyt o f

i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a lbr i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f or ans w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o ar g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      2,574,300
<SECURITIES>                                1,480,900         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 237,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            4,292,200 
<PP&E>                                     16,907,200
<DEPRECIATION>                              7,033,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             14,395,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         475,100
<BONDS>                                     5,998,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,554,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               14,395,400
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,825,900
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 743,500 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               60,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               467,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           467,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  467,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   10.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   10.56
        

</TABLE>
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From:.·· 

Sent:· 

To: 

Subject: 

j "\ ' 

Jerold Backstrom <p12sd41@yahoo.com> 

Tuesday, August 14, 2012 2:32 PM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Brainerd Regional Airport 

Since Delta has indicated they will discontinue service to Brainerd, 

three airlines have submitted bids for replacing Delta. 

The best choice would be SkyWest, as they fly the same type of 

plane and would be able to use the jet bridge rather than having passengers 

climb a ladder to' board the plane. 

Jerold Backstrom 

Brainerd, MN 

1 

3\