alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                      <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                        14,187
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 45,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                     486
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       137,916<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                21,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               358,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0<F1>
<BONDS>                                       75,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         110
<OTHER-SE>                                   202,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 358,543
<SALES>                                       92,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              92,685
<CGS>                                         15,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 15,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               48,454
<INCOME-TAX>                                  17,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           31,184
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  31,184
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   2.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   2.82

<FN>
<F1> The Company does not present a classified balance sheet; therefore, current
     assets and current liabilities are not reflected in the Company's financial
     statement.

<F2> PP&E does not include  seismic data bank assets with a cost of $346,103,000
     and related accumulated amortization of $181,248,000.



</FN>
        

</TABLE>
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2008

/s/ E.L.
Spencer, Jr.

E.L. Spencer, Jr.

President, Chief Executive Officer

and Chairman of the Board
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Q3 2004**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David Kirwan, certifythat:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Fischer Imaging Corporation;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

 

a.               Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in this quarterly report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

5.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

 

a.               All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 15,  2004 | /s/   DAVID  KIRWAN         |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | David Kirwan*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Buffets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 9, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
R. Michael Andrews, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

             (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

             (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



May 22, 2003                               /s/ R. Michael Andrews, Jr.
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                             R. Michael Andrews, Jr.
                                             Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Buffets, Inc. and will be retained by Buffets, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
| ·   | This addendum serves to update the Loan Agreement (attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-K/A-2 Coronus Solar Inc. filed with the SEC on December 10, 2010) between Jefferson Thachuk (the “Lender”) and Coronus Solar Inc. (the “Borrower”). |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | This addendum is current as of June 20, 2011. |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------|

| ·   | A detailed chronology of the Loans, subsequent to October 19, 2010 is attached to this addendum as Exhibit A. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | As at March 31, 2011, the principal amount of the Loans totaled CAD $246,000 and USD $6,600. |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | As at June 20, 2011, the principal amount of the Loans totaled CAD $204,500, plus USD $6,600. |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| JEFFERSON THACHUK            |   | RAVEN KOPELMAN               |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Jefferson Thachuk            |   | Raven Kopelman               |
| Lender                       |   | Coronus Solar Inc., Director |
|                         |   |                         |
|                         |   |                         |
| DAVID HOLMES                 |   | KENNETH BOGAS                |
| David Holmes,                |   | Kenneth Bogas                |
| Coronus Solar Inc., Director |   | Coronus Solar Inc., Director |

----

| EXHIBIT A                             |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |   |   |   |   |
| Loans from Shareholder - Jeff Thachuk |   |   |   |
| As at June 20, 2011                   |   |   |   |   |
|                                  |   | CAD |   | USD |
| Date                                  | Source | Principal |   | Principal |
|                                  |   |   |   |   |
| 19-Oct-10                             | Opening Balance | 246,000 |   | 6,600 |
| 18-Apr-11                             | Deposit | 8,500 |   | - |
| 10-May-11                             | Payment | (50,000) |   | - |
|                                  |   |   |   |   |
|  Total                           |   |  CAD         204,500 |   |  USD             6,600 |

----
Mairim HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2221

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      3,803,300 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 383,700 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            4,266,100       
<PP&E>                                     16,906,500      
<DEPRECIATION>                              6,707,000    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             14,515,100      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         661,200    
<BONDS>                                     6,704,800  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                                  6,914,600       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               14,515,100         
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3,918,600          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,402,400          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               83,200       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            674,400       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,388,100       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,388,100      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                1,388,100 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   31.33 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   31.33 
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                             966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (237)
<INVENTORY>                                     56,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,194
<PP&E>                                          78,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                (38,082)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,082
<SALES>                                         44,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,938
<CGS>                                           30,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   139
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                       484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                790
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
Robert Hughes HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3587

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 23, 2018

Robert Hughes Harris, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Harris appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds Two, Four, Five, Six, Seven, and Eight. However, because the record does not conclusively refute Harris's sufficiently pled claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to ask for an alibi instruction, we reverse the summary denial of Ground One and remand for attachment of portions of the record conclusively refuting this claim or for an evidentiary hearing. *See**Freeman v. State*, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) ("[A] defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient." (citing *Maharaj v. State*, 684 So.2d 726 (Fla. 1996) )). We also reverse the summary denial of Ground Three, regarding counsel's alleged misleading advice on Harris's right to testify, and remand for an evidentiary hearing. *Simon v. State*, 47 So.3d 883, 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (concluding evidentiary hearing is usually necessary to determine whether counsel's advice not to testify is deficient).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

BERGER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur
John JOSEPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3672

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
D.L., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1938

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CRAIG BASSETT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20 2 4

- 1319

[ August 15, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 0 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Cymonie S. Rowe

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502004CF002150AXXX

.

Craig Bassett, South Bay, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee

.

P ER C URI A M

.

Affirmed

.

M AY

, L EVINE and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed December 14, 2022

.

________________ No s

. 3D 22

- 1221 & 3D22

- 1365 Lower Tribunal No . 17

- 15268

________________ 

### L.G., the Mother , Appellant,

vs. 

### Department of Children and Families, et al., Appellee s

.
Appeal s from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Jason E. Dimitris, Judge. Thomas Butler, P.A., and Thomas J. Butler , for appellant. Karla Perkins, for appellee Department of Children & Families; Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee , Assistant Director of Appeals (Tallahassee), for appellee Guardian ad Litem

.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO , JJ. GORDO, J.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR2 The Department of Children and Families’ concedes the trial court failed to address the requisite statutory factors in its determination of indigent
status of the Mother. 1 Without the trial court’s written consideration of the
factors pursuant to section 27.52(4), Florida Statutes, this Court cannot properly conduct appellate review of the order on appeal.
Reversed and r emanded.

1 We express no opinion as to the trial court’s final determination.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2430 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2430

 To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Acetamiprid, whether or 
                 not mixed with application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary reduction of duty on Acetamiprid, whether or 
                 not mixed with application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACETAMIPRID, WHETHER OR NOT MIXED WITH APPLICATION 
              ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.72 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Acetamiprid, whether or not 
mixed with application adjuvants) is amended by striking the date in 
the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Desmond Ross, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Solar Power Corp (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the fiscal Year ended June 30, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Desmond RossName:Desmond RossTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:September 29, 2008 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.