alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

MHI Hospitality Corporation

4801 Courthouse Street, Suite 201

Williamsburg, Virginia 23188

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Annual Report on Form (Form 10-K) of MHI Hospitality Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008 of our reports dated March 9, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules
for the three years ended December 31, 2008.

We consent to the incorporation by the reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130664) of MHI Hospitality Corporation,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121478) pertaining to the securities to be offered to employees in employee benefit plans,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 9, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MHI Hospitality Corporation and subsidiaries included elsewhere herein.



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ Witt Mares, PLC
|                   
|Norfolk, Virginia  
|March 9, 2009
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
  I, Jennifer A. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of Winland Electronics, Inc.,certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Winland Electronics, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuerand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’smost recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee ofsmall business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 5, 2004 /s/ Jennifer A. Thompson   Jennifer A. Thompson   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.13

GUARANTEE & INDEMNITYCROSS BORDER (ALL MONIES)

|Dated:          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|In this deed:   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|"the guarantor" |  | is TRM Corporation Inc.
of 5208 N.E. 122nd Avenue, Portland, Oregon
97230 - 1074, United States of America                                                                                             
|"the company"   |  | is BARCLAYS MERCANTILE BUSINESS FINANCE LIMITED (a company registered in England, company number 898129) whose registered office is at Churchill Plaza, Churchill Way, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7GP
|"the customer"  |  | is TRM Copy Centres (U.K.) Limited
(a company registered in England, company number 3220922) whose registered office is at Unit 4, Brunel Centre, Newton Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 2US          



1

---

2

---



3

---

IN
WITNESS whereof this deed was entered into the day and year first before written.

EITHER

The
Common Seal of TRM Corporation Inc.

has
been hereunto affixed
in the presence of:

Director

Secretary

0R

|          |  |                             |  |                          
|--------- |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Signed by |  | /s/ Kenneth L. Tepper       |  | Signature(s) confirmed by
|          |  |                             |  |                          
|          |  | Kenneth L. Tepper           |  | \s\ Rebecca Demy         
|And       |  |                             |  | Assistant Secretary      
|          |  | /s/ Amy B. Smith for and on |  |                          
|          |  |                             |  |                          
|          |  | Amy B. Smith                |  |                          

behalf
of TRM Corporation Inc.
pursuant to a resolution of the Board of
Directors (a certified copy of which is
annexed hereto)

I/we/each
of us hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of a copy of the above guarantee.





4

---

QuickLinks
SERVED: NOVEMBER 28, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

W ASIDNGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TIMOTHY GAUNA 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

· (Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0870 

HEARING NOTICE 

~;hr..-, 

Ld~! 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

· on January 14 and 15, 2013, in Courtroom 1944D, U.S. District Court, Northern 

District of Illinois, Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604.1 Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30 

p.m. each day. The parties should. vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00 p~m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service. 

Attachment - Service List 

f##_t~-~ Richard C. Good~ M 

U.S: Administrative Law Judge 

. '' 1 The parties should con:finn the courtroom with Larry Collins, Administrative Assistant to ·the Chief Judge, 

Room 2530A [312-435-5603; FAX 312-408-5088], prior to or on the day of hearing. 

1 
. 

I. 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W .. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

I 

Timothy Gauna, Respondent 

2516 Lincoln Street 

Evanston, IL 60201 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7B 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAJ{: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. {Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL:. 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAJ{: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NO .. FAA-2012-0870 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 For Service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: F&ieralAviatio~ Administration, 600 

Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWrightBuilding-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing · 

Docket Clerk, AGC-430 ..
Phillip C. BLACKWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1209

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
Frank Allan SOBCZAK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-1168

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
Joellen STANDARD, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Standard, Appellant, v. James W. CONNER, III, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4200

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Brandon Matthew BASLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3573

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 03, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
the controlling law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. 

Accordingly, we 

REVERSE the order granting summary judgment AND 

REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings 

consistent with this order. 

CHERRY, J., concurring: 

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. 

U.S. Bank, NA., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree 

that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners 

association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR 

Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, in the 

disposition of this appeal. 

concur 

Cita. 

Cherry 

J. 

cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge 

Howard Kim & Associates 

Akerman LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A Wei.
Exemption Request under Section 333 of the 

FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the FAR 

14 AUG 15

Appendix 1 Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX A 

FLIGHT MANUAL 

FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS 

1. No flight will be made with a UA Gross weight exceeding 55 pounds. 

2. All operations must occur in FAA Class G airspace at no more than 400 ft AGL, at an airspeed of 

no more than 50 knots and no further than 3/4 NM from the PIC. Visibility shall be at least one 

statute mile and all flights will be conducted clear of clouds. 

3. All operations must utilize a VO. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate by voice at all 

times during a flight operation and maintain visual line of sight with the UA. 

4. The PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot 

certificate and have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51 (b), a 

minimum of 100 flight cycles and 25 hours of total time as a UA rotorcraft pilot and at least ten 

hours logged as a UA pilot with a similar UA type. 

5. All required permits will be obtained from state and local governments prior to operation. 

6. The UAVS will not be operated over heavily trafficked roads, densely populated areas, air shows, 

any open air assembly of people, or within 5 NM of an airport or heliport. 

7. Operations will be restricted to daylight hours only and weather conditions equivalent to VFR. 

8. The PIC will brief the VO about the operation and risk before the initial flight at each new 

location. 

9. No flight may be made without a Pre-Flight Inspection by the PIC before each operation to 

ascertain that the UA is in a condition safe for flight. 

1. PRESTART CHECKLIST 

o Batteries Charged: 

a. Remote controller battery 

b. Range extender 

c. Aircraft battery 

d. Mobile device 

o Propellers are mounted correctly and 

firmly 

o Gimble clamp removed 

o Damping absorbers in good condition 

o Anti-Drop kit mounted correctly 

o Camera Lens Cap Removed 

o Micro-SD card has been inserted 

2. SYSTEM POWER ON CHECKLIST 

o Power on Controller 

o Power on range extender 

o Power on aircraft 

o Gimbal function 

o DJI Pilot app connected to the aircraft 

o More than 6 satellites found 

o Compass Calibration 

o Record Home Point 

3. FLIGHT CHECKLIST 

o Rear LED’s green 

o CLEAR PROPS 

o Motors start and are functioning as 

normal. 

FAILSAFE ACTIVATION 

o The remote controller loses power or is 

powered off 

o The aircraft flies out of the effective range 

of the controller 

o The signal between the aircraft and 

remote controller is blocked 

o Interference causes a signal problem 

between the remote controller and the 

aircraft 

If radio contact is lost and not restored within 3 

seconds, an automatic Return to Home feature is 

activated and will bring the UAV back to the PIC.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on Thursday, May 21, 2009.

                    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The purpose of the Commission is to assist Federal, State and local authorities in                           ( print page 16886)                        the development and implementation of an integrated resource management plan for those lands and waters within the Corridor.                

The meeting will convene on May 21, 2009 at 9 a.m. at the Blackstone Valley Regional Vocational Technical High School, located at 65 Pleasant Street, Upton, MA for the following reasons:

1. Approval of Minutes.

2. Chairman's Report.

3. Executive Director's Report.

4. Financial Budget.

5. Public Input.

It is anticipated that about thirty people will be able to attend the session in addition to the Commission members.

Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made prior to the meeting to: Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John H. Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.

Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director of the Commission at the aforementioned address.

Jan H. Reitsma,

Executive Director, BRVNHCC.

[FR Doc. E9-8322 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00221

- CV

IN RE RHONDA LEE COUGOT

Original Proceeding

______________

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9276PR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator ’ s Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied. Relator ’ s Motion for

Emergency Stay is d ismissed as moot.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

B efore Chief J usti ce Gray, *

Justice Johnson

, an d

Justice Smith

Petition denied ; motion d ismissed

O pi nio n d elivered and f iled September 15, 2021

[ OT 06]In re Rhon da Lee Cougot Page 2

* ( Chief Justice Gray dissents. A separate opinion will not issue. Chief Justice Gray

notes, however that he would grant the emergency motion seek ing a stay of the trial court

proceedings, particularly the impending trial, and request a response with a view to

granting the requested writ. If the testimony of the scrivener of the will as to

communications with the deceased about the testator ’ s inten t is improperly protected

from disclosure, the result of the trial on the meaning of that will is virtually guar anteed

to be the result of harmful error if the Relator is otherwise unsuccessful in that trial. It

would be hard to find any evidence that was more important or persuasive than the

testimony of the decedent’s attorney, other than possibly a video recordi ng of the

decedent. Therefore, for jurisprudential reasons, the time to address this question is

before trial via mandamus, rather than in a di rect appeal after the trial has been

concluded. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America , 148 S.W.3d 124 , 136 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding) ).
Exhibit 32


                           Section 1350 Certifications

                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned is the Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Newsearch, Inc.
This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Newsearch, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

The undersigned certifies that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Newsearch, Inc. as of September 30, 2005.

This Certification is executed as of June 19, 2006.

                                 /s/ Dean Wicker
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                     Dean Wicker
                                     Director, CEO, President and CFO
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to us, Inc. and will be retained by Newsearch, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ex1017.htm


 


Exhibit 10.17











Issue Date: June 27, 2011


PO Number: COGNA42P1-1


Customer: NAVAIR 4.2 Cost Performance


Project: Command Information Center – Data Integration (CIC-DI)


                Proof of Concept


Start Date: July 15, 2011


End Date: September 30, 2011







NAVAIR 4.2 Cost Performance Directorate is designing, building and deploying an integrated Command Information Center for Data Integration supporting the Naval Aviation System Command NAVAIR.







Defense & Security Technology Group, LLC has been selected to provide System Integration services and solutions.







Cogility Complex Event Process and Data Integration Proof of Concept and Test







NAVAIR 4.2 requires an 120-day evaluation of Cogility’s complex event processing and data integration capabilities.  For this limited scope proof-of-concept evaluation, Cogility shall:








	
·  

	
Demonstrate a single thread through the CIC-DI prototype to show data and process integration capability across 1-2 input sources (initially with structured data source(s))








	
·  

	
Demonstrate event-driven system to system integration of 2 dynamic operational process templates (templates shall include business rules)








	
·  

	
Demonstrate rapid iterative changes to process templates to proof-of-concept system












Cogility shall provide resources to support the following deliverables for Phase I Task 1.0:








	
Milestone

	
REPORT/DELIVERABLE

	
Due Date


	
1.1

	
· Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Approach


· Proof-of-Concept Master Information Model Architecture


· Single-Thread Scenario Definition


· PoC Scope and Acceptance Criteria

	
Contract Award + 30 Days


	
1.2

	
· Process and Business Use Case Test Documentation


· Data Integration Architecture

	
Contract Award + 60 Days


 


 


	
1.3

	
· PoC Version .01 Demo Test Scenarios & Acceptance

	
Contract Award + 90 Days


 


	
1.4

	
· PoC Version .01 Demo


· Final PoC Evaluation Summary

	
Contract Award + 120 Days












 




  





1 of 2











  





















Resources (Time & Materials)








	
Resource

	
Role

	
Rate


	
Alex Jiang

	
·  Modeler and Developer

	
$122.60 per hour


	
Thien Pham

	
· User Interface


· Modeler and Developer

	
$122.60 per hour


 







 


 


 




	
Buyer:

	 	P.O. Acknowledged by:
	 	 	 
	 	6/27/211	 
	Minh Le	Date	Date












  





2 of 2