alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARY

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
of the date hereof (the Report), I, E.L. Spencer, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



|                                                             |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                        |  | 
|E.L. Spencer, Jr.                                            |  | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board |  |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6576]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq*.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “The Chimaera of Arezzo,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Malibu, CA, from on or about July 16, 2009, until on or about February 8, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: April 6, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-8231 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Magnetek, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David P. Reiland, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toU.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  David P. Reiland                             |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David P.  Reiland                                      |
|   | Executive  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

Dated: February 13, 2004

 

----
Ironclad




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




Ironclad
      Performance Wear Corporation


2201
      Park
      Place, Suite 101


El
      Segundo, CA. 90245





We
      consent to the inclusion of the financial statements of Ironclad Performance
      Wear Corporation and our report dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements and schedules of Ironclad Performance Wear
      Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
      December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
      333-139210 and 333-145855) on Form S-8 of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation
      of our report dated March 17, 2008 relating to our audit of the consolidated
      financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
      Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation for the year ended December 31,
      2007.







/s/
      ROTENBERG AND COMPANY, LLP




ROTENBERG
      AND COMPANY, LLP




Rochester,
      New York




March
      26,
      2008
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of SmartMetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: September 28, 2011
By:
/s/ C HendrickC. Hendrick

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)
Dwight David JORDAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2883

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Tony HOPPS, Doc #480313, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1009

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Marcus TOMLINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 20, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                          1000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                5,122
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         14,637
<ALLOWANCES>                          644
<INVENTORY>                           18,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      41,245
<PP&E>                                14,488
<DEPRECIATION>                        8,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        53,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 9,498
<BONDS>                               65
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           13
<COMMON>                              69
<OTHER-SE>                            42,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          53,015
<SALES>                               15,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      15,151
<CGS>                                 9,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         9,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      6,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (1,412)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (1,412)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          (1,412)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.17)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**











**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      David
      Zaikin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
      Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
      31,
      2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





By:/s/
      David Zaikin


David
      Zaikin


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





April
      2,
      2007
Document

Exhibit 10.20

SSR MINING INC. 2020 SHARE COMPENSATION PLAN
AGREEMENT FOR RESTRICTED SHARE UNITS
###PARTICIPANT_NAME### (the “Participant”)
Pursuant to the SSR Mining Inc. 2020 Share Compensation Plan effective May 14, 2020 (the “Plan”) and in consideration of services provided to the Company by the Participant, SSR Mining Inc. hereby grants to the Participant ###TOTAL_AWARDS### Restricted Share Units under the Plan on ###GRANT_DATE###.
All capitalized terms not defined in this Agreement have the meaning set out in the Plan. No cash or other compensation shall at any time be paid in respect of any Restricted Share Units which have been forfeited or terminated under the Plan or on account of damages relating to any Restricted Share Units which have been forfeited or terminated under the Plan. Your Grant is subject to the provisions of the Plan (as it may be amended from time to time) and the terms and conditions in this Agreement.
The Vesting schedule for this award is ###VEST_SCHEDULE_TABLE###.
Vested Restricted Share Units will be redeemed on the Vesting Dates. SSR Mining Inc. may, at its election, choose to redeem your Vested Restricted Share Units in the form of Common Shares issued from treasury, Common Shares purchased on the market or cash with a value equal to the Market Price of a Common Share for each Restricted Share Unit.
By accepting this grant, the Participant agrees (i) to be bound by the terms of the Plan, including the forfeiture provisions in Article 11 of the Plan, (ii) that participation in the Plan is voluntary and the Participant has not been induced by the expectation of employment or service or continued employment with the Company, and (iii) that neither this Grant nor the Restricted Share Units contemplated pursuant to this agreement gives the Participant the right to continued employment or service with the Company or its affiliates in any capacity.
SSR Mining Inc. and the Participant understand and agree that the granting and redemption of these Restricted Share Units are subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, a copy of which has been provided to the Participant all of which are incorporated into and form a part of this Agreement. For greater certainty, the Participant authorizes the sale of a sufficient number of Common Shares to pay withholdings taxes on the redemption of any Restricted Share Units.
																		
	DATED ###GRANT_DATE###.


SSR MINING INC.
	 		 
	 	 	 


By accepting this grant, I agree (i) to be bound by the terms of the Plan, including the forfeiture provisions in Article 11 of the Plan, (ii) that my participation in the Plan is voluntary and I have not been induced by the expectation of employment or service or continued employment with the Company, and (iii) that neither this Grant nor the Restricted Share Units contemplated pursuant to this agreement gives me the right to continued employment or service with the Company or its affiliates in any capacity.
  
_____________________________
Name ###PARTICIPANT_NAME###
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DALE R. PATE, DOC #263121, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4282 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 2, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Frank Quesada, Judge. Dale R. Pate, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
IN the INTEREST OF M.G., a child.

R.G., Petitioner, v. Department of Children and Families, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-3186

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Steven Antonio HAYWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and Department of Corrections, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2986

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
12.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I,
Dato’ Nathan Mahalingam, certify that:





1.
 I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 20-F of Mission NewEnergy
Limited;





2.
 Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;





3.
 Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





4.
 The company’s
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
have:





a.
 Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;





b.
 Designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;





c.
 Evaluated the
effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and





d.
 Disclosed in this
report any change in the company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the company’s internal control over
financial reporting; and





5.
 The company’s
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the
company’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





a.
 All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and





b.
 Any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the company’s internal control
over financial reporting.





Date:
October 31, 2017





/s/ Dato’ Nathan
Mahalingam


Dato’
Nathan Mahalingam


Chief Executive
Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50974

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODRIGO ACOSTA-ESQUIVEL,

also known as Luis Huerta, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-947-ALL-PRM

--------------------

February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodrigo Acosta-Esquivel appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Acosta-Esquivel contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Acosta-Esquivel maintains that

he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple
No. 02-50974

-2-

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be

imposed for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Acosta-Esquivel acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Electronics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jennifer A.
Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: November 22, 2004 /s/ Jennifer A. ThompsonJennifer A. ThompsonChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Thomas Kreig, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation.




Dated: March 10, 2011





/s/ Thomas KreigThomas Kreig,Senior Vice President of Finance andPrincipal Financial Officer




This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace.  Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.