alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM
10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
 Or
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from                      to
 Commission file number: 001-32417
 Education Realty Trust, Inc.
  Maryland
    
    20-1352180(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)530 Oak Court Drive, Suite 300
    
    38117Memphis Tennessee
    
    (Zip Code)(Address of principal executive offices)
 
 Title of class
    
    Name of exchange on which registeredCommon Stock, $.01 par value per share
    
    New York Stock Exchange
 None
 o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer þ
    
    Non-accelerated filer   o
    
    Smaller reporting company o
 o þ
   Documents
Incorporated by Reference




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Education Realty Trust, Inc.By:
    /s/ Paul O. BowerPaul O. BowerDated: March 28, 2008
    
    President, Chief Executive Officer
                    and Chairman of the Board of Directors
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Application Under the Equal Access )

to Justice Act of

-- ) ) Government Contracting Resources, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. NNK080B12C ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59162

Jennifer M. Miller, Esq.

Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP Raleigh, NC Scott W. Barber, Esq.

NASA ChiefTrial Attorney Charles Alexander Vinson, Esq.

Assistant ChiefCounsel Miata L. Coleman, Esq.

Trial Attorney Kennedy Space Center, FL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Pursuant to the parties' 29 April 2015jointmotion to dismiss appeal with prejudice stating that the parties have settled both the quantum portion ofthe appeal as well as the applicant's request for fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in ASBCA No. 59162, ASBCA No. 59162 is hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within 120 days ofthe date ofthis Order. Dated: 1May 2015

# ~If; MARK A. MELNICK Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals on an application for fees and other expenses incurred in connection with ASBCA No. 59162, Appeal ofGovernment Contracting Resources, Inc., rendered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 504. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
# C_2007095EN.01000801.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 March 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien — Austria) — KVZ retec GmbH v Republik Österreich

(Case C-176/05) (1)

1

(Waste - Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 - Supervision and control of shipments of waste - Meat-and-bone meal)

(2007/C 95/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KVZ retec GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Republik Österreich

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien — Interpretation of Article 1(2)(d) and Article 26(1)(a) and (b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community (OJ 1993 L 30, p. 1) — Meat-and-bone meal shipments — Obligation to notify

Operative part of the judgment

Under Article 1(3)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2557/2001 of 28 December 2001, the shipment of meat-and-bone meal classified as waste on account of a requirement or intention to discard it, which is destined for recovery only and listed in Annex II to that regulation, is excluded from the scope of the provisions of the regulation except as provided for in Article 1(3)(b) to (e), Article 11 and Article 17(1) to (3) thereof. However, it is for the national court to ensure that that shipment takes place in compliance with the requirements arising from the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 808/2003 of 12 May 2003, amongst which those of Articles 7, 8 and 9 and of Annex II to the regulation may prove to be relevant.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

1

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15- 30435

ERIC BORCIK,
Plaintiff - Appellant

v. CROSBY TUGS, L.L.C.,
Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Eric Borcik brought this whistleblower suit against Crosby Tugs, alleging that Crosby had fired him in retaliation for reporting environmental violations. Under Louisiana law, Borcik can only recover if he reported the violation in “good faith.” La. Stat. Ann. § 30:2027. The case was tried to a jury,
which was instructed that “ good faith ” meant that “the plaintiff had an honest belief that an environmental violation occurred and that he did not report it either to seek an unfair advantage or to try to harm his employer or another employee.” The jury found via special interrogatory that Borcik did not report the violation in good faith, resulting in a defense verdict. Borcik appealed, United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-30435 Document: 00514016097 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2017No. 15- 30435

2 arguing that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury correctly on the definition of “good faith.” On appeal, we determined that we were not in a position to make an Erie guess as to the meaning of “good faith” and certified the following question to the Louisiana Supreme Court: What is the meaning of “good faith” as that term is used in the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act, Louisiana Revised Statutes 30:2027? Borcik v. Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. , 656 F. App’x 681, 685 (5th Cir. 2016). The Louisiana Supreme Court accepted the question and answered it as follows: The term “good faith,” as used in R.S. 30:2027, means an employee is acting with an honest belief that a violation of an environmental law, rule, or regulation occurred. Borcik v. Crosby Tugs, L.L.C

. , 2016

- 1372, --- So. 3d ---, 2017 WL 1716226 (La. 5/3/17). Based on the definition of the term provided by the Louisiana Supreme
Court , the district court erred by instruct ing the jury that “good faith” required more than “an honest belief that a violation of an environmental law, rule, or regulation occurred.” Accordingly, we remand for such orders and further proceedings as the district court, in its discretion, deems necessary and appropriate. REMANDED. Case: 15-30435 Document: 00514016097 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2017
Document



Exhibit 10.44
March 16, 2021 Richard M. Buskirk
[address]
Dear Rick:
This letter is to confirm your promotion to the position of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer reporting to Eilif Serck-Hanssen, Chief Executive Officer for Laureate Education, Inc. effective March 17, 2021. This position will be considered remote with no specific office assignment, however, may require frequent travel to the Corporate Office in Baltimore, MD. Also, this position classified as a regular, full-time salary position for wage and hour purposes, and we are making the following offer:


Position:    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Base Salary:    $380,000 Annually


Annual Bonus:    Your target bonus percentage is 100% of Base Salary and will not
be pro-rated for 2021 per our discussion.




LTI Target:    Subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors, you will continue to be eligible to participate in our annual equity-based compensation program with an annual target of 100% of your base salary.


Awards may be a mix of: i) restricted stock units, (ii) performance share units, and (iii) stock options, each with respect to the Company’s* Class A common stock, par value $0.004 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”). The exercise price of any stock options will be greater than or equal to the fair market value of the Class A Common Stock on the grant date. Awards will be subject to the terms and conditions of the Laureate 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan” as the same may be amended from time to time) and one or more award agreements that you must sign and accept in order to receive the awards.


As soon as practicable following the effective date of your promotion, the Company will recommend to the Compensation Committee that it grant you an equity award. The recommendation will be for you to receive the full award (100%) for 2021.


The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors may consider additional equity awards to you in future years.


			
	650 SOUTH EXETER STREET BALTIMORE, MD 21202    WWW.LAUREATE.NET














Congratulations on your new position, and we wish you continued success at Laureate Education, Inc. Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning it to my attention, retaining a copy for your files.




  Sincerely, 


/s/ Eilif Serck-Hanssen


Eilif Serck-Hanssen Chief Executive Officer Laureate Education, Inc.




Acknowledgement of Acceptance:


/s/ Richard Buskirk                 3/16/2021
Signature                     Date


			
	650 SOUTH EXETER STREET BALTIMORE, MD 21202    WWW.LAUREATE.NET
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Connected Media Technologies, Inc. f/k/a
Trust Licensing,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended  December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  (the  "Report"),  Jeffrey W.  Sass,  President  and Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company and Jay Howard Linn,  Acting Chief  Financial  Officer of
the Company,  respectively,  do each hereby certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey W. Sass
-------------------------------------
Jeffrey W. Sass
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 30, 2005

/s/ Jeffrey W. Sass
-------------------------------------
Jay Howard Linn
Acting Chief Financial Officer
September 30, 2005

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Quincy GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1234

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Kirwan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 12,  2006  | /s/   DAVID KIRWAN          |   |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                           | David Kirwan*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FischerImaging Corporation and will be retained by Fischer Imaging Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Afelix DESIR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D15-741

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.0

Consent of Beard Miller Company LLP

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-122247 and No. 333-129849) of BV Financial, Inc. of our report dated September 6, 2006, except for note 1, Earnings per share (restated), as to which the date is March 14, 2007,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of BV Financial, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-KSB/A2.



|    
|----
|LOGO

Beard Miller Company LLP

Baltimore, Maryland

March 29, 2007
Michael DOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2050

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jeffrey Dean LINDBERG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5513

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed August 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2
 
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Daniel Mirman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig
Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
 
 /s/
      Daniel MirmanDaniel
      Mirman
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                March
      31, 2009
Hershel WALKER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D17-3220

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Mario Tauro COTO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 27, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 25 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) FROM: Angela Cullen TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on May 16 and 17 , 2011 b etween EMA and EPA and included the following individuals: EMA: Tim Blubaugh - EMA, Jed Mandel

– EMA, Tony Cook

– Navistar, Patrick Charbonneau

– Navistar, David Kayes – Daimler, Dan Kieffer

– PACCAR , , Brian Mormino - Cummins, Jackie Yeager

– Cummins, Tony Greszler

– Volvo, Marc Miller

– Volvo, Brian Burton

– Daimler, Jack Gehring

– Caterpillar, Don Keski - Hynnila

– Detroit Diesel EPA: By ron Bunker , Chuck Moulis , Cle Jackson, and Angela Cullen The discussion focused on the vehicle and engine certification process.
Robert B. EVELEIGH, Margaret M. Eveleigh, and Carl B. Eveleigh, as named trustees of the separate GST-exempt trusts f/b/o Elizabeth A. Eveleigh and Jennifer M. Eveleigh, Appellants, v. Elizabeth Anna EVELEIGH and Jennifer M. Eveleigh, Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D16-5166

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 7, 2017

Edmond E. Koester, Alex R. Figares, and Caroline Marisa Magliolo of Coleman, Yavanovich & Koester, P.A., Naples, and Louis D. D'Agostino and Maria Vigilante of Cheffy Passidomo, P.A., Naples, for Appellants.

Jack J. Aiello, John P. Cole, Jason P. Van Lenten, and Lauren V. Purdy of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Robert Goldman and Jon Scuderi of Goldman Felcoski & Stone, P.A., Naples, and for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

*799Appellees' amended motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

RAY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:




(1) Form S-8
(No. 333-159233) pertaining to the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Amended and Restated Management Stock
Purchase Plan, LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Retirement Plan, and LifePoint
Hospitals, Inc. Outside Directors Stock and Incentive Compensation
Plan;




(2) Form S-4
(No. 333-119929), as amended, pertaining to the joint proxy
statement/prospectus of Lakers Holding Corp. related to LifePoint Hospitals,
Inc.’s merger with Province Healthcare Company;




(3) Form S-3
(No. 333-128279), as amended, pertaining to the $225,000,000
3.25% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2025; and




(4) Form
S-3 (No. 333-143121), pertaining to the $500,000,000 3.5% Convertible Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014;




of our
reports dated February 19, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc., included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2009.


/s/Ernst
      & Young LLPNashville,
      TennesseeFebruary
      19, 2010
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2457 

To suspend temporarily the duty on anatase titanium dioxide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on anatase titanium dioxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANATASE TITANIUM DIOXIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Anatase titanium dioxide 

(CAS No. 1317–70–0) (provided for in subheading 

2823.00.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2457 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         289,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,969,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,130
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,274,653
<PP&E>                                      68,009,607
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,444,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,900,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,881,979
<BONDS>                                     16,632,610
<COMMON>                                       181,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,925,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,900,412
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,112,563
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,708,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (9,177)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             304,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,826
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,826
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .004
        


</TABLE>
Waymon SPRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2734

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
M. L. W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-3499

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.