alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        12,698
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           263
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               8,210
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   76,690
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        44,829
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          45,154
<LOANS>                                      168,595
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               317,664
<DEPOSITS>                                   276,326
<SHORT-TERM>                                  11,510
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,525
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1,790
<OTHER-SE>                                    24,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               317,662
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7,402
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3,557
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 184
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              11,143
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4,571
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,732
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          6,411
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                68
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,667
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,918
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  4.66
<LOANS-NON>                                      937
<LOANS-PAST>                                      49
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,813
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,670
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     13
<RECOVERIES>                                      29
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,886
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,886
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        2,094
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Seitel, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marcia H. Kendrick, Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 12, 2010/s/

Marcia H. KendrickMarcia H. Kendrick Principal
Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Daniel H. GOVIND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary LINDSEY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-56176.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Daniel H. Govind, Represa, CA, pro se.

Corey J. Robins, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state parolee, Daniel H. Govind, appeals pro se the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, *see Delhomme v. Ramirez,*340 F.3d 817, 819 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam), and we vacate and remand.

The issues certified for appeal were whether the district court erred by dismissing Govind’s § 2254 petition as untimely and failing to toll the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act 1-year statute of limitations from the date of his first state habeas petition in California Superior Court until the denial of his last state habeas petition in California Supreme Court.1 We conclude that it did.

Govind is entitled to tolling during the entire time he was seeking one full round of collateral review by the California courts. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(d); *Carey v. Saffold,*536 U.S. 214, 220, 122 S.Ct. 2134, 153 L.Ed.2d 260 (2002) (reiterating that *205exhaustion requires one Ml round of review by the state courts, during which time, the statute of limitations is tolled because petitioners’ applications are pending); *Nino v. Galaza,*183 F.3d 1003, 1006 (9th Cir.1999) (“we hold that the statute of limitations is tolled from the time the first state habeas petition is filed until the California Supreme Court rejects the petitioner’s final collateral challenge”).

As there is no indication that any of Govind’s state habeas petitions was untimely or his delay between petitions unreasonable, *see Saffold,*536 U.S. at 225-26 (noting that if California Supreme Court had expressly held delay was unreasonable, petition would no longer be “pending”), we conclude that Govind’s § 2254 petition was timely filed. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s decision and remand for a determination on the merits.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. To the extent that Govind raises additional arguments, we decline to consider them because they were not certified for appeal. *See Hiivala v. Wood,*195 F.3d 1098, 1103 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam); 9th Cir. R. 22-1.
# Official Journal C 365/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 365 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 584 November 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 365

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 584 November 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2015/C 365/1 | Position (EU) No 14/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the UnionAdopted by the Council on 1 October 2015 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 365/2 | Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 14/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the union | 20 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2015/C 365/1

Position (EU) No 14/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the UnionAdopted by the Council on 1 October 2015 (
  1
  )

1

1

2015/C 365/2

Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 14/2015 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the union

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the
"Company for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bret H. Krevolin, Chief Accounting
Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Date:    August 13, 2004                     By:  /s/ Bret H. Krevolin
         ---------------                          -------------------------
                                                  Bret H. Krevolin
                                                  Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provide to QNB Corp. and will be retained by
the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|           |   |                    |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------|
|           |   |                    |   |
| April 14, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Youval Saly    |   |
|           |   | Youval Saly             |   |
|           |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|           |   |                    |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

The purpose of this notice is to inform the public about a conference call of the NIH Blue Ribbon Panel to Advise on the Risk Assessment of the National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories at Boston University Medical Center. This meeting is the first in a series of public meetings to review and discuss the ongoing supplementary risk assessment study.

The conference call will be held on Tuesday, April 7, 2009 from approximately 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. The toll-free number to participate in the call is 1-800-779-2616. Indicate to the conference operator that your participant passcode is “NIH.”

The panel will review earlier National Research Council (NRC) recommendations regarding a supplementary risk assessment study, Blue Ribbon Panel recommendations regarding various aspects of the risk assessment study, and a new Statement of Task for the NRC.

Public comment will begin at approximately 12:45 p.m. In the event that time does not allow for all those interested to present oral comments, anyone may file written comments by sending them to the address below. Comments should include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the commenter.

                    A draft agenda and slides for the meeting may be obtained by connecting to                     *http://nihblueribbonpanel-bumc-      ( print page 15297)    neidl.od.nih.gov/​.*                     For additional information concerning this meeting, contact Ms. Laurie Lewallen, Advisory Committee Coordinator, Office of Biotechnology Activities, Office of Science Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 750, Bethesda, MD 20892-7985; telephone 301-496-9838; e-mail                     *lewallenl@od.nih.gov.*

Dated: March 31, 2009.

Amy P. Patterson,

Acting Director, Office of Science Policy, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. E9-7704 Filed 4-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EPA Registration Jacket 241-426 

Vol.2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 18-1412
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v.
JOHN SILVIA, JR., a/k/a JOHN SILVIA, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on March 20, 2020 is amended as follows: On page 7, line 14, replace "Loc. R. 27(c)" with "Loc. R. 27.0(c)"
M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 26th day of 

June, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JORUAM C. OLIVARES, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-12-00722-CR (Tr.Ct.No. CR-11-10772-F)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 26, 2014.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal 

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 29th day of January, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
STATE of Louisiana v. Marcel Dewayne THOMPSON

NO. 2017-KO-1199

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

Denied.
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement ofJohn Deere Capital Corporation**

 

I, Michael Matera, SeniorVice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

 

A review of the activities of John Deere CapitalCorporation (“JDCC”) for the period from June 9, 2009 (the date ofissuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2009 transaction subject to therequirements of Regulation AB) through October 31, 2009 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of JDCC’s performance under the Sale & ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2009 among JDCC, John Deere Receivables, Inc.and John Deere Owner Trust 2009 has been made under my supervision, and to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review JDCC has fulfilled all itsobligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period, except that, as a result of clerical errors, certainitems reported in the settlement statements filed as exhibits to Form 10-Dreports dated July 27, 2009, August 27, 2009, September 24, 2009and 23 October 2009 were inaccurately represented.  The items inaccurately represented in thesereport did not affect the amounts of principal or interest paid to holders ofany security issued by John Deere Owner Trust 2009 in any of the impactedpayment periods. Measures have been implemented to address the situations describedherein, and the reported items were revised and filed on Form 10-D reportsdated November 12, 2009.

 

 

 

 
| Date: January 4,  2010 |   | John Deere Capital  Corporation |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                        |   |                            |
|                        |   |                            |
|                        |   |                            |
|                        |   | By                              | /s/ *Michael Matera* |   |
|                        |   |                            | Michael Matera |
|                        |   |                            | Senior Vice President and Controller |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50887

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE DELGADO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-340-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Delgado has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Delgado has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
No. 05-40781

2

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Tami J. Story, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) This
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      April 21, 2008
            /s/
      Tami J. StoryTami
      J. StoryChief
      Financial Officer
### The State of TexasAppellee/s 

# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** March 18, 2014 N o s . 04 - 14 - 00136 - CR , 04 - 14 - 00137 - CR, 04 - 14 - 00138 - CR, & 04 - 14 - 00139 - CR Billy Edward GONZALEZ , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No s . 12 - CR - 611 , 12 - CR - 615 - CR, 12 - CR - 613, & 12 - CR - 609 Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER The trial court imposed the sentence s in Appeal Nos. 04 - 14 - 00136 - CR, 04 - 14 - 00138 - CR, and 04 - 14 - 00139 - CR on October 30, 2013, and signed the order being appealed in Appeal No. 04 - 14 - 00137 - CR on October 31, 2013 . A ppellant did not file a motion for new trial. Because appellant did not file a timely motion for new trial, the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was November 29, 2014 , for Appeal Nos. 04 - 14 - 00136 - CR, 04 - 14 - 00138 - CR, and 04 - 14 - 00139 - CR, and December 2, 2014, for Appeal No. 04 - 14 - 00137 - CR . T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal was not filed until February 25, 2014, and the record shows it was not mailed until February 18, 2104 , and appellant did not file a motion for e xtension of time to file the notice of appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. We therefore order appellant to file a written response on or before April 17, 2014 showing cause why th e s e appeal s should not be dismissed for want of jurisdi ction . See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke court of appeals ’ jurisdiction). If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal s will be dismissed. If a supplemental clerk ’ s record is required to show jurisdiction, appellant must ask the trial court clerk to prepare one and must notify the clerk of this court that such a request was made. We order a ll deadlines in this matter s uspended until further order of the court. We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of March, 2014 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court