alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Indian Gaming Commission

          - 25 CFR Part 547
          - RIN 3141-AA64

# AGENCY:

National Indian Gaming Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On December 27, 2017, the National Indian Gaming Commission published a rule amending its minimum technical standards for Class II gaming systems and equipment. This document corrects the preamble regarding the OMB Control Number and OMB Control Number expiration date.

# DATES:

Effective January 19, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Austin Badger, National Indian Gaming Commission; 1849 C Street NW, MS 1621, Washington, DC 20240. Telephone: 202-632-7003.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In the final rule FR Doc. 2017-27945, published on December 27, 2017, the following correction is made:

                    On page 61175, in the second column, the paragraph “The information collection requirements contained in this rule were previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as required by 44 U.S.C. 3501*et seq.*                     and assigned OMB Control Number 3141-0007, which expired in August of 2011. The NIGC is in the process of reinstating that Control Number.” is corrected to read “The information collection requirements contained in this rule were previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as required by 44 U.S.C. 3501*et seq.*                     and assigned OMB Control Number 3141-0014. The OMB control number expires on November 30, 2018.”                

 Dated: January 16, 2018.

Jonodev O. Chaudhuri,

Chairman.

Kathryn Isom-Clause,

Vice Chair.

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer,

Associate Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 2018-00936 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7565-01-P
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1424

COTE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

THOMS TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. Margaret J. Kravchuk, U.S. Magistrate Judge]

Before

 Torruella, Chief Judge,

Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.

William C. Nugent on brief for appellant.

Peter M. Garcia and Skelton, Taintor & Abbott on brief for

appellee.

August 29, 2000
Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record

and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm. The lower court

found that the fair market value of the destroyed property

was $165,000, and given that the uncontroverted evidence

showed that was the cost of replacing the property, we see

no error in the court’s conclusion. See Ferrell v. Cox, 617

A.2d 1003, 1007 (Me. 1992) (uncontroverted evidence

presented by owner as to fair market value of property

supported award of damages). To the extent appellant argues

the evidence only demonstrated the retail fair market value

of the property, not the wholesale value, the argument is

forfeited since it was first raised in the reply brief. See

Waste Mgmt. Holdings, Inc. v. Mowbray, 208 F.3d 288, 299 (1st

Cir. 2000). Furthermore, the argument is meritless, since

the uncontroverted testimony established that as a

wholesaler, appellee would have had to pay $165,000 in order

to replace the property. Finally, we see no error in the

court’s calculation of appellee’s post-accident damages,

especially since the court explicitly reduced the amounts in

question by appellee’s profit margin. See Titcomb v. Saco

Mobile Home Sales, Inc., 544 A.2d 754, 758 (Me. 1988)

(property owner not required to prove damages to a

“mathematical certainty”).
-3-

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7929]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a closed meeting on Thursday, April 
9, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
April 9, 2009 will be:
    Institution and settlement of an injunctive action
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: April 3, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-7929 Filed 4-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M AR C US R . TAYLOR , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TR ADEM ARK OFFIC E, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-15230 D.C . No. 3:12-c v-03851-W HA M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia W illia m Alsup, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 17, 2013 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, W ALLAC E, a nd GR AB ER , C irc uit Judge s. M arc us R . Ta

y l or a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e n t dism issing his ac tion a lle ging viola tions of va

rious fe de ra l la

ws a rising from

the a lle ge d le ak

of his c onfide ntia l pa

te nt disc losure sta

te m e nt. W e have jurisdic tion



# FIL ED D EC 31 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wfor an a buse of disc re t ion the de nia l of a m otion for le ave to a

m e nd a c om pla i nt, Sy l v ia Landfie ld Trust v . C

i ty of Los Ange le s , 729 F.3d 1189, 1191 (9th C ir. 2013), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

de ny i ng Ta

y lor le ave to am e nd his c om

pla int to a lle ge fra

ud be c a use the Unite d Stat e s a

nd its a ge nc ie s a

re im m une from c la im s of fra

ud unde r the Fe de ra l Tort C la i m s Ac t (the “ FTC A ” ), and, the re fore , Ta

y lor’ s propose d am e ndm e nt would ha ve be e n futile . Se e id. at 1196 (holding tha

t it is not a

n a buse of disc re tion to de ny le ave to a

m e nd whe re the distric t c o urt c ould re a s ona bly c onc lude tha

t furthe r am e ndm e nt would befutile ); Ow y he e G razing Ass’n, Inc . v . Fie ld , 637 F.2d 694, 697 (9th C i r. 1981) (stating that “ c la im s a ga inst theUnite d State s for fra ud or m isre pre se ntation by a fe de ra l offic e r a re a b solute ly ba rre d by 28 U.S.C . § 2680(h) [of theFTC A] ” ). W e do not c onside r a l l e gations ra ise d for the first tim e on a

ppe a l re ga

rding the a lle ge d viola

tion of Ta y lor’ s Fourth Am e ndm e nt right a ga inst theunla wful se iz ure of prope rty . Se e Padge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 5 2 3 0 2
D.B. v. STATE

CR-15-0091

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Electronics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Lorin E.
Krueger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: November 22, 2004 /s/ Lorin E. KruegerLorin E. KruegerChief Executive Officer
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Seitel, Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Robert D. Monson, President and Principal ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 
| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | The Report fully complies with  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and

  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)

The information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: August 13, 2008

  /s/ Robert D. Monson

Robert D. Monson

President and Principal Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement, required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and willbe furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

  |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR
              RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Andre Heroux, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Beauceland
Corporation;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual
Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
   financial reporting.

                                 /s/ Andre Heroux
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                 Name:    Andre Heroux
                                 Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 25, 2005
DISMISS and Opinion F iled September 9, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-24-00643-CV

IN THE MATTER OF J. L.T.M., A JUVENILE
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. J02738

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Carlyle Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), appellant has filed
a motion to dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion
and dismiss the appeal. See id.

240643F.P05 /Robert D. Bu r ns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE MATTER OF J.L.T.M., A JUVENILE

No. 05-24-00643-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. J02738. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered September 9, 2024.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60758

Conference Calendar

 

DOUGLASS WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STEVE PUCKETT; EDWARD HARGETT; 

ANN LEE; JOAN ROSS; LARRY HARDY; 

ANTHONY COX; WINFRED HILL; FLOYDD BASS; 

SGT. SMITH; SGT. SPICES; SGT. JOHNSON; 

PAM ROBERISON; CASE MAG. BARNETT; 

CASE MGR WATSON; CASE MGR. PRESLEY; 

CASE MGR. BEASLEY; CASE MGR. JOHN,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95-CV-347-D-D

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Douglass Williams, Mississippi prisoner # 33706, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to state a cause of action. Williams

argues that he was subjected to excessive force in violation of
No. 96-60758

- 2 -

the Eighth Amendment and that he did not receive due process of

law at a prison disciplinary hearing. We have reviewed

Williams’s brief and the record and AFFIRM for essentially the

same reasons adopted by the district court. Williams v. Puckett,

No. 4:95cv347-D-D (N.D. Miss. Oct. 17, 1996).
Bryan COHEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-144

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jourdens VAL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3512

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 565

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ RAYMOND GERALD MCBRIDE , Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 24 th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant, Raymond Gerald McBride , perfected this appeal from a judgment of

conviction entered by the 24 th District Court of Victoria County, Texas in trial court cause

numbe r 21

- 07

- 33060

- A

. A ppellee has now filed a motion to permanently abate the

appeal

, based on the death of appellant, Raymond Gerald McBride

. According to the2

motion, appellant died on January 31, 2023 , after appeal was perfected, but before this

Court issued its mandate. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 7.1(a)(2).

We grant appellee’s motion, and, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 7.1(a)(2), we hereby order th e appeal permanently abated

.

GINA M. BENAVIDES Justice

Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 30th day of March , 202 3

.
# Úřední věstník C 38I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 038I |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 643. února 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 038I

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 643. února 2021

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ |
| | Rada |
| 2021/C 38 I/01 | Oznámení o zrušení | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Rada

2021/C 38 I/01

Oznámení o zrušení

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Rada

| 3.2.2021 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CI 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2021

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CI 38/1

---

OZNÁMENÍ O ZRUŠENÍ

(2021/C 38 I/01)

Oznámení výběrového řízení na volné pracovní místo CONS/AD/167/21 v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie (1) se zrušuje.

---

(1)  Úř. věst. C 29 A, 26.1.2021, s. 1.

---
# Službeni list C 34I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 034I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 64.1. veljače 2021. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 034I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 64.1. veljače 2021.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | V.   Objave |
| | ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI |
| | Europska investicijska banka |
| 2021/C 34 I/01 | TDI 2021 – Poziv na podnošenje prijedloga – Ideje koje mijenjaju svijet: EIBI-jev Turnir u društvenim inovacijama za 2021. | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

V.   Objave

ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI

Europska investicijska banka

2021/C 34 I/01

TDI 2021 – Poziv na podnošenje prijedloga – Ideje koje mijenjaju svijet: EIBI-jev Turnir u društvenim inovacijama za 2021.

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

V. Objave

ADMINISTRATIVNI POSTUPCI

Europska investicijska banka

| 1.2.2021 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 34/1

---

TDI 2021 – Poziv na podnošenje prijedloga

Ideje koje mijenjaju svijet: EIBI-jev Turnir u društvenim inovacijama za 2021.

(2021/C 34 I/01)

Institut EIB-a priređuje deseto izdanje svog Turnira u društvenim inovacijama

Turnir u društvenim inovacijama (TDI) namijenjen je promicanju inovativnih ideja i nagrađivanju rješenja kojima se omogućuje stvaranje društvenog i okolišnog učinka kroz projekte na cijelom nizu raznih područja – od obrazovanja i zdravstva, preko otvaranja radnih mjesta, pa sve do novih tehnologija, sustava i procesa. Svi projekti natječu se za dvije nagrade u Općoj kategoriji, a projekti koji se bave ovogodišnjom temom održivog življenja natjecat će se i za dvije nagrade u Posebnoj kategoriji. Kako bi se obilježila deseta obljetnica TDI-a, pobjednički projekti u obje kategorije osvajaju prvu ili drugu nagradu u iznosu od 75 000 odnosno 30 000 EUR, kao i nagradu po izboru publike u iznosu od 10 000 EUR.

Pratite nas na Facebooku: www.facebook.com/EibInstitute.

Za opširnije obavijesti o ovome turniru i o tome kako dostaviti inovativne prijedloge, posjetite stranicu: http://institute.eib.org/programmes/social/social-innovation-tournament/.

---
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                       Certification by CEO to Section 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Touchstone Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the "Report"), I, Jason K.
Raza, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ Jason K. Raza
------------------------------
Jason K. Raza
Chief Executive Officer
November 6, 2003