alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 134 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 134

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To require an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of the 
 National Institutes of Health pursuant to reports and recommendations 
            made under the National Alzheimer's Project Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alzheimer's Accountability and 
Investment Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROJECT.

    Section 2 of the National Alzheimer's Project Act (42 U.S.C. 11225) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Professional Judgment Budget.--For fiscal year 2024 and each 
subsequent fiscal year, the Director of the National Institutes of 
Health shall prepare and submit, directly to the President for review 
and transmittal to Congress, after reasonable opportunity for comment, 
but without change, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and 
the Advisory Council, an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of 
the National Institutes of Health pursuant to the reports and 
recommendations made under this Act, including an estimate of the 
number and type of personnel needs for the National Institutes of 
Health.''.

            Passed the Senate July 30, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 134

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To require an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of the 
 National Institutes of Health pursuant to reports and recommendations 
            made under the National Alzheimer's Project Act.
```
Jose M. VEGA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3493

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 6, 2018

Jose M. Vega, Bristol, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*797The appellant, Jose M. Vega, appeals the trial court's summary denial of the motion he filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In the motion, Vega alleged that he entered into a plea agreement that provided that he would admit his violation of probation and serve an additional eighteen months in prison. Vega had previously served a sentence of ten years in prison on the substantive charges. The trial court, in accordance with the plea agreement, sentenced him to eleven years and 283 days in prison, with credit for 103 days served in the county jail and the ten years he had previously served in the Department of Corrections.

After he was sentenced, the Department of Corrections calculated the gain time Vega was entitled to from his previous term of incarceration. Pursuant to that calculation, Vega would be required to serve in excess of the eighteen months in prison provided for in his plea agreement. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Vega's motion and remand this case to the trial court to either resentence Vega in accordance with the plea agreement or to allow him to withdraw his plea. *See**Dellofano v. State*, 946 So.2d 127, 129 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) ; *Dellahoy v. State*, 816 So.2d 1253, 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3015-3016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]


Indian Gaming; Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compacts Taking 
Effect in the State of California

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Tribal-State Class III Gaming 
Compacts entered into between the Dry Creek Band of Pomo Indians, the 
Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, the Morongo Band of Mission 
Indians, the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation, the San 
Manuel Band of Mission Indians, the Tule River Indian Tribe of the Tule 
River Indian Reservation, the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians of the 
Tuolumne Rancheria of California, the United Auburn Indian Community of 
the Auburn Rancheria of California, and the Wilton Rancheria, 
respectively, and the State of California are taking effect.

DATES: The compacts take effect on January 22, 2018.

[[Page 3016]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, telephone: (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act (IGRA) requires the Secretary of the Interior to publish in the 
Federal Register notice of an approved Tribal-State compact that is for 
the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. 
See Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. All Tribal-State Class 
III compacts, including amendments, are subject to review and approval 
by the Secretary under 25 CFR 293.4. The Secretary took no action on 
the compacts within 45 days of their submission. Therefore, the 
compacts are considered to have been approved, but only to the extent 
the compacts are consistent with IGRA.

    Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C).

    Dated: December 15, 2017.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs Exercising the 
Authority of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018-01058 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
Vance Lee GAVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2992

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

Report of Independent Accountants

 

Board of Directors

Harley-Davidson Credit Corp.

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying “Management’sReport on Internal Control Over the Servicing and Preparation of Monthly Servicer’sCertificates “ that Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. maintained effective internalcontrol over the servicing requirements identified  in Article V, and the reportingrequirements identified in Article IX of the Sale and Servicing Agreement(the “Servicing Agreement”), dated as of August 1, 2004 betweenHarley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2004-3, as Issuer, Harley-DavidsonCustomer Funding Corp., as Trust Depositor, Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., asServicer and BNY Midwest Trust Company as Indenture Trustee for the year ended December 31,2004, based on criteria established in “Internal Control-IntegratedFramework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the TreadwayCommission. Harley-Davidson Credit Corp.’s management is responsible for maintainingeffective internal control over the servicing requirements and the reportingrequirements identified in the Servicing Agreement. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standardsestablished by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of the internal control overthe servicing requirements and reporting requirements identified in theServicing Agreement, testing and evaluating the design and operatingeffectiveness of the internal control, and performing such other procedures aswe considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatementsdue to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any evaluation of theinternal control over the servicing requirements and reporting requirementsidentified in the Servicing Agreement relative to future periods are subject tothe risk that the internal controls may become inadequate because of changes inconditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or proceduresmay deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the management ofHarley-Davidson Credit Corp. maintained effective internal control over theservicing requirement and reporting requirements of the Servicing Agreement asof December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects, based oncriteria established in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 
|                  | /s/ Ernst & Young  LLP |
|-----------------------|----------------------------|
|                  |
| January 14, 2005 |

 

----
Marcus B. HARRIS, Appellant, v. Jennifer FOLSOM, Warden, Polk Correctional Institution, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1577

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Jeremy Morris ERVIN

NO. 2018-KH-0231

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 16, 2018

Writ not considered. Untimely filed pursuant to Louisiana Supreme Court Rule X § 5.
STATE EX REL. George MCGEE v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2017-KH-0325

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. McGee v. State, 17-0134 (La. __/___/18).
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### AUG 13 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. NICK ALFRED OWENS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-6081 (D.C. No. CR-94-64-C) (W.D. Okla.)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, BRORBY and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. In his most recent effort to overturn his convictio n for violating the federal drug laws, Nick Alfred Owens filed a pleading entit led “Motion to Strike All-2-

Pleadings by the United States.” He contended thatthe district court had no jurisdiction over his original criminal proceedings . The district court dismissed the pleading in a minute order. Mr Owens appeals and we affirm. Mr. Owens was convicted in 1994 for violating 21 U. S.C. § 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We affirmed his conviction on appeal, although we remanded for resentencing. United States v. Owens , 70 F.3d 1118 (10th Cir. 1995). On May 15, 1997, Mr. Owens filed a pleading entitled “ Motion for Judgment,” which requested that his conviction and sentence be vacat ed for lack of jurisdiction. The district court denied the motion as being witho ut legal foundation. We dismissed Mr. Owen’s appeal as untimely. United States v Owens , 134 F.3d 383 (10th Cir. 1998). On February 2, 1998, Mr. Owens f iled the current pleading again seeking vacation of his conviction and senten ce for lack of jurisdiction. The district courts of the United States have origi nal jurisdiction over all violations of federal law. 18 U.S.C. § 3231. See also United States v. Watson, 1 F. 3d 733, 734 (8th Cir. 1993). We agree with th e district court that Mr. Owen’s claim to the contrary is entirely without le gal or factual foundation. While this appeal has been pending, Mr. Owens filedthe following series of motions in this court:
1. Motion for Expedited Ruling, March 17, 1998.-3-

2. Motion to Correct Jurisdictional Errors and Ven ue, March 27, 1998. 3. Motion for Judgment and Costs, April 6, 1998. 4. Motion for Judgment of Acquital(sic) and Costs, April 27, 1998. 5. Motion to Dismiss, June 22, 1998. Each of these motions asserts, among other things, that the district court lacked jurisdiction over Mr. Owens’ original criminal case . We deny all of the motions in their entirety. The judgment of the district court dismissing Mr. O wens’ action is AFFIRMED. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Vital Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Lavonne Baucom Lamar, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Nationwide Insurance Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Office of Melissa Betancourt, P.C. (Melissa Betancourt and Jamin Koo of counsel), for appellant.Gialleonardo, McDonald, Safranek &amp; Turchetti (Kevon Lewis of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Joy F. Campanelli, J.), entered February 14, 2017. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover upon a claim in the amount of $342.01 is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the proof submitted by defendant was sufficient to establish the proper mailing of the independent medical examination (IME) scheduling letters (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]) and that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for the IMEs (<i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720 [2006]). Defendant further demonstrated that it had timely mailed (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond</i>, 50 AD3d 1123) its NF-10 forms denying the claims at issue, except for the claim seeking reimbursement in the amount of $342.01. As to that claim, we find on this record that there is an issue of fact as to whether defendant ever received it. Consequently, neither party is entitled to summary judgment upon that claim.</p><p>Plaintiff's remaining contentions lack merit.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is modified by providing that the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover upon a claim in the amount of $342.01 is denied.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: March 22, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
B. A-S., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

# AGENCY:

United States Institute of Peace.

*Date/Time:*                     Thursday, April 23, 2009; 9:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.                

*Location:*                     1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011.                

*Status:*                     Open Session—Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, Pub. L. 98-525.                

*Agenda:*                     April 23, 2009 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the One Hundred Thirty-Second Meeting (January 9, 2009) of the Board of                           ( print page 16917)                        Directors; Chairman's Report; President's Report; Education and Training Center Update; Budget Update; Selection of Peace Scholars; Selection of National Peace Essay Contest Winners; Other General Issues.                

*Contact:*                     Tessie F. Higgs, Executive Office, Telephone: (202) 429-3836.                

Dated: April 2, 2009.

Michael Graham,

Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.

[FR Doc. E9-8109 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65, 012]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 29, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Destination Maternity Corporation, formerly known as Mother's Working Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of March 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-8276 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,904,364
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,453,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                     157,187
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,253,424
<PP&E>                                        66,546,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                29,785,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                42,067,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,996,013
<BONDS>                                       10,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                       97,450
<COMMON>                                         203,319
<OTHER-SE>                                    26,070,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  42,067,522
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,971,205
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,972,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (46,455)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               660,502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  888,119
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              888,119
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     888,119
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .028
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .028



</TABLE>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1126 

To amend title XX of the Social Security Act to expand the activities 

authorized under adult protective services demonstration grants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XX of the Social Security Act to expand 

the activities authorized under adult protective services 

demonstration grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guardianship Grant 

5 Flexibility Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANDING ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED UNDER 

7 ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES DEMONSTRA8 TION GRANTS. 

9 Section 2042(c)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1397m–1(c)(2)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1126 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as sub4 paragraph (G); and 

5 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol6 lowing new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(F) State court programs for recruiting 

8 and training law students through clinics super9 vised by a licensed attorney to provide represen10 tation for respondents in guardianship cases, 

11 and to serve as guardians ad litem; or’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB