alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Biotel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                          |                                                       
|------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 29, 2008 | /s/ B. Steven Springrose                              
|                          |                                                       
|                          | B. Steven Springrose                                  
|                          | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
 officer)
|                          |                                                       
|Dated: September 29, 2008 | /s/ Judy E. Naus                                      
|                          |                                                       
|                          | Judy E. Naus                                          
|                          | Chief Financial Officer                               
|                          | (principal financial
 officer)                        

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Biotel Inc. and will be retained by Biotel Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Michael RUFFIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-5154

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 22, 2017

Michael Ruffin, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See**Baker v. State*, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT
99.7



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Jim Zadra, Chief Financial Officer of Great Panther Mining Limited (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the
                                         Annual Report on Form 40-F/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
                                         (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                                         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the
                                         information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                                         the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:    | “Jim
    Zadra”            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | Jim Zadra                  
| | Title: | Chief Financial
    Officer
| | Date:  | April 23, 2020
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement No.
333-122097 on Form SB-2 of  Hemobiotech,  Inc. of our report dated  February 17,
2006 (with respect to last paragraph of Note K, March 28, 2006) on our audits of
the financial statements as of December 31, 2005 and for each of the years ended
December 31, 2005, and 2004 and for the period from October 3, 2001  (inception)
through December 31, 2005, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


New York, New York
March 29, 2006
EX PARTE Olivia Lee REYNOLDS

1151284 (CR-14-1726)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
STATE EX REL. Jacole GATLIN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0165

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Marcus Taaron GARRISON, Doc# T22891, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5554

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Davidson
Diversified Real Estate II, L.P. 1999 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000750258
<NAME> DAVIDSON DIVERSIFIED REAL ESTATE II L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          45,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         26,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,508)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,136
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,332
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (62)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (49.83)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
created by Section 906 of

the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 1, 2007



/s/    ROQUE A. SANTIRoque A. SantiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.5

<PAGE>





                                  June 26, 2000



Mr. David Lawi
3 Ramapo Trail
Harrison, New York 10528

     Re:  Promissory  Note  dated  October  2,  1998 in the  original  amount of
          $773,437.50

Dear Mr. Lawi,

     On the date hereof,  the Company has entered into an  Employment  Agreement
Amendment  No. 2 (the  "Employment  Agreement  Amendment")  with you pursuant to
which we have agreed to change the payment terms of that certain promissory note
(the "Note") dated October 2, 1998 in the original amount of $773,437.50 made by
you payable to the order of Seitel,  Inc.  (the  "Company") as set forth herein.
Also pursuant to the Employment Agreement  Amendment,  we have agreed to release
the  existing  security  for the Note  (75,000  shares  of  common  stock of the
Company) and to take in exchange for such security a contractual right of setoff
as described in Section 8 of the Employment Agreement Amendment.  As of the date
hereof, the balance due on the Note was $665,778  (including interest accrued to
such date).  This letter will serve as the formal amendment of the payment terms
of the Note and the release of such pledged stock as security for the Note.

     Upon your acceptance of the terms of this letter,  the payment terms of the
Note shall be as follows:

          $65,778 of principal and all accrued and unpaid  interest shall be due
          and payable to the Company on January 2, 2001;

          A payment of all accrued and unpaid  interest shall be due and payable
          on January 2, 2002;

          $400,000 of principal and all accrued and unpaid interest shall be due
          and payable to the Company on January 2, 2003; and

          The Note shall mature on January 2, 2004,  when the entire  balance of
          principal and accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable.

     You hereby reaffirm the contractual  right of offset set forth in Section 8
of the Employment Agreement  Amendment,  and agree that the Company may withhold
from amounts due to you under your  employment  agreement  all amounts due under
the Note.

     Upon your acceptance of the terms of this letter,  the Company will release
the pledge of the 75,000 shares of Company common stock  evidenced by the Pledge
Agreement dated October 2, 1998 previously granted as security for the Note. The
Company will promptly  deliver the original share  certificate  evidencing  such
shares to you.

     Except as amended hereby, all of the provisions of the Note shall remain in
full force and effect.

     Please  sign a copy of this  letter in the space  provided  and  return the
original  signed copy to the Company to evidence your agreement to the terms set
forth in this letter.

                                                  Seitel, Inc.

                                                  By: /s/ Paul A. Frame
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Paul A. Frame, President
Accepted and Agreed this 26th day of June, 2000

 /s/ David S. Lawi
--------------------------
   DAVID S. LAWI
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.G. Barry Corporation for the
quarterly period ended October 2, 2010;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 10, 2010
    /s/ José G. IbarraPrinted
    Name: José G. IbarraTitle:
    Senior Vice President  Finance and
 Chief 
Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Annual Report of JMG Exploration, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph W. Skeehan, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: July 24­­, 2009  /S/ Joseph W. SkeehanName:Joseph W. SkeehanTitle:Chief Executive and Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JMG Exploration, Inc.   and will be retained by JMG Exploration, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        By virtue of the authority vested in the President by Section 2(a) of Public Law 87-693 and delegated to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget by the President through Executive Order 11060, as amended by Executive Order 12608 of September 9, 1987, the rates referenced below are hereby established. These rates are for use in connection with the recovery from tortiously liable third persons for the outpatient medical, dental and cosmetic surgery services furnished by military treatment facilities through the Department of Defense. They are the same rates as the outpatient third party reimbursement rates that were set on July 1, 2017 for billing medical insurers, but require a different approval authority for the purpose of billing for tort liability. The rates were established in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-25, requiring reimbursement of the full cost of all services provided. The CY 2017 outpatient medical, dental and cosmetic surgery services referenced are effective for billing tort liability upon publication of this notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         and will remain in effect until further notice. Previously published inpatient rates remain in effect until further notice. Pharmacy rates are updated periodically. A full disclosure of the rates is posted at Health.mil website in the Defense Health Agency Uniform Business Office section (                        *http://health.mil/​Military-Health-Topics/​Business-Support/​Uniform-Business-Office/​Billing/​Medical-Affirmative-Claims*).                    

John Mulvaney,

Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

[FR Doc. 2018-01244 Filed 1-23-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
#### Taiwo Rufus AGBOOLA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

No. 03-1735.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 5, 2004.

Decided May 10, 2004.

Bobby Gordon Sea, Sea Law Office, St. Paul, MN, for Petitioner.

Thomas W. Hussey, Linda S. Wendtland, Deborah Misir, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Shelley R. Goad, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, Paul Schmidt, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Falls Church, VA, Richard Soli, District Counsel, Bureau Of Immigration *&*Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security Bloomington, MN, for Respondent.

Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Taiwo Rufus Agboola, a Nigerian citizen, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the denial of his application for asylum. After careful review of the record, we deny the petition. *See Menendez-Donis v. Ashcroft,*360 F.3d 915, 917-19 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review).

Agboola generally argues that his procedural and substantive due process rights were violated because the immigration judge (IJ) disallowed the testimony of his expert witness. We disagree. *See Escudero-Corona v. INS,*244 F.3d 608, 614 (8th Cir.2001) (reviewing constitutional challenges de novo). Agboola has not described testimony the proposed expert would have provided that might have changed the IJ’s conclusive determinations. *See Kerciku v. INS,*314 F.3d 913, 918 (7th Cir.2003) (per curiam) (to find due process violation, applicant must show he was prejudiced by IJ’s refusal to hear testimony, i.e., that testimony had potential for affecting outcome). Nor has he explained how the IJ’s decision to exclude the testimony at issue constituted a substantive due process violation. *Cf. Putnam v. Keller,*332 F.3d 541, 547-48 (8th Cir.2003) (substantive due process claim requires showing that government officials’ arbitrary action was conscience-shocking).

Agboola also argues that he should have received asylum based on his religious beliefs and membership in a particular social group. This argument fails as well. The IJ based his asylum decision primarily on his determination that Agboola had misrepresented a material fact by submitting a fraudulent document. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i) (alien who, by fraud or willful misrepresentation of material fact, seeks to procure admission to United States is inadmissible). The IJ also gave multiple other reasons for finding that Agboola’s assertions regarding a fear of persecution were not credible. We, like the BIA, defer to the IJ’s credibility findings, as they are well supported by the record and by specific cogent reasons. *See Loulou v. Ashcroft,*354 F.3d 706, 709 (8th Cir.2003), *amended by,*No. 02-3004, slip op. (8th Cir. April 28, 2004).

Accordingly, we deny the petition.