alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

     I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
     Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect
     of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWMBS,
     Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2004-20;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
     whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
     report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
     required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the
     pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
     reports is included in these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
     servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
     upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
     agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer
     has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
     upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
     conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
     Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
     pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
     reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
     Bank of New York, as Trustee.

     Date: March 28, 2005

                                       /s/ Steve Bailey
                                       ----------------
                                       Steve Bailey
                                       Senior Managing Director
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation


2201 Park Place, Suite 101


El Segundo, CA 90245







We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. -139210 and -145855) of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation of our report dated March 2, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,  which appear in this Form 10-K.





/s/  EFP Rotenberg, LLP


EFP Rotenberg, LLP


Rochester, New York


March 10, 2011
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Panoshan Marketing Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Berardo, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  December 10, 2007

By:  /s/ David Berardo

Name: David Berardo

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
regan

John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor

February 4, 2002

John Iani

Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region 10

1200 Sixth.Avenue

Seattle, WA 98101

Re: Final Draft Revision Authorization Application

Dear Mr. Iani:

Department of Environmental Quality

811 SW Sixth Avenue

Portland, OR 97204-1390

(503) 229-5696

TDD (503) 229-6993

Enclosed is the final draft application for revision to Oregon's authorized RCRA

Hazardous Waste Management Program. Assembling an authorization application is an

arduous task, and we want acknowledge Ms. Lynn Williams, EPA, for her guidance and

model language for the Attorney General's Statement, and her work in bringing the

application to fruition.

The Department has been administering much ofthe federal program since being

authorized in 1986. With this application, the Department is requesting authorization for

the remainder ofthe RCRA program through April 12,2000, including regulations

addressing land disposal restrictions, hazardous waste recycling, Universal Waste,

hazardous waste permits, and state-only regulations related to the Chemical

Demilitarization Program, effective March 27, 2001. The package also includes an

updated Program Description and Memorandum ofAgreement.

We hope that your review and approval process for our application is speedy.

1/-;.

'r (1

DEQ-I
We are available to answer any questions or provide information. Please contact Gary

Calaba ofmy staff, 503-229-6534, or me, 503-229-5870, if you need anything further.

Thank you for your ongoing support and consideration.

Sincerely,

Sheila A. Monroe

Manager

Hazardous Waste Policy and Program Development Section

Land Quality Division

Cc: David Rozell, DEQ

Mary Kay, EPA

Larry Edelman, DOl

Hazardous Waste Managers
-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

October 10, 2017

v No. 332890

Wayne Circuit Court

DELSON EDWARD SIMMONS II, LC No. 15-009743-02-FC

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SAAD, P.J., and CAVANAGH and CAMERON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals by leave granted1 his plea-based conviction of assault with intent to do 

great bodily harm less than murder, MCL 750.84. Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant was 

sentenced to 1 to 10 years’ imprisonment. Defendant now appeals the imposition of court costs 

as ordered at his sentencing. We remand.

Defendant contends that the trial court was required to provide a factual basis for the 

assessment of court costs in the amount of $1,300; thus, remand is required. After review of this 

unpreserved issue for plain error affecting defendant’s substantial rights, we agree. See People v 

Konopka (On Remand), 309 Mich App 345, 356; 869 NW2d 651 (2015).

The parties agree that MCL 769.1k allowed the trial court to order defendant to pay “any 

cost reasonably related to the actual costs incurred by the trial court without separately 

calculating those costs involved in the particular case[.]” MCL 769.1k(1)(b)(iii). However, as in 

the Konopka case, here, the trial court did not articulate a factual basis for the costs imposed. 

Konopka, 309 Mich App at 359. And “without a factual basis for the costs imposed, we cannot 

determine whether the costs imposed were reasonably related to the actual costs incurred by the 

trial court, as required by MCL 769.1k(1)(b)(iii).” Id. at 359-360. While the prosecution makes 

a sound argument that the amount of $1,300 in costs is reasonable in light of the typical costs of 

adjudicating such criminal proceedings, as in Konopka, defendant “should be given the 

 1 People v Simmons, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered June 23, 2016 (Docket 

No. 332890).
-2-

opportunity to challenge the reasonableness of the costs imposed.” Id. at 360. Accordingly, this 

matter is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of establishing a factual basis for the $1,300 

in costs imposed under MCL 769.1(b)(iii), or to adjust that figure as necessary. See id.

Remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction.

/s/ Henry William Saad

/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh

/s/ Thomas C. Cameron
[FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN LOGO]

U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services
60 Livingston Avenue
Mailcode: EP-MN-WS3D
St. Paul, MN 55107-2232


RE: Officer's Certificate


The undersigned officers certifies the following for the 2004
fiscal year:


(A) I have reviewed the activities and performance of the
    Servicer during the preceding fiscal year under the
    terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling
    and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide
    and to the best of these Officers' knowledge, the Servicer
    has fulfilled all of its duties, responsibilities or
    obligations under these Agreements throughout such year,
    or if there has been a default or failure of the servicer
    to perform any of Such duties, responsibilities or obligations
    , a description of each default or failure and the nature
    and status thereof has been reported to the U.S. Bank
    Corporate Trust Services

(B) I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an approved
    FNMA or FHLMC servicer in good standing.

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity bond, the Errors and
    Omissions Insurance Policy and any other bonds required
    under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust Agreement,
    Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide
    are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance Policy
    (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable)
    , with respect to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that all
    such insurance policies are in full force;

(E) All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any
    other expenses accrued and due, that if not paid could result
    in a lien or encumbrance on any Mortgaged Property, have been
    paid, or if any such costs or expenses have not been paid with
    respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
    has been reported to U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual reports of foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgage Property
    required per section (605011, 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue
    Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

/s/  Kyle Walker
Officer
EVP-COO
Title
3/24/2005
Date
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# ^225)II-E-18 5 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM

Sheet 225 of 264P. 2 08/31/8 8 MO N

14:4 5 FA X 36 0 69 6 0055 _ GL V .Layallej i 1^)00 1 _uu z

From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t Shaw n McKee , Pacifi

c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) Augus t 27,199 8 Ms . Sand y Brackin s GL& V LaValle y Industries , Inc . Telephon e Number : (360 ) 696-258 8 Fa x Number : (360 ) 696-005 5 Contac t Summary : Ms . Sand y Bracldn s wa

s contacte d o n behal f o f the U.S . EP

A t o provid

e information abou

t potentia l indirec t costs associate

d wit h changin g resins . I n respons e t o m

y question s Ms , Brackin s indicated tht

i following : GL& V LaValle y Industries , Inc . ha s change d the resin the

y us e i n mos t

o f thei r corrosio n resistant processe s t o aviny

l este r resin wit h a styren e conten t o f 34% . Th e resi n tha t the y had previousl y used was aviny

l este r resi n wit h astyren e conten t o f 43% . GL&

V La V alle y Industries , Inc . use s nearl

y 200,00 0 pound s o f resin pe r yea r i n th e productio n o f corrosion resistant

products . The increas e in cos t

fo r th e ne w resin o f slightl y les s tha n $0.2 5 pe r poun d adds ; approximatel

y $40,000 per

yea r i n materia l costs . Whe n GL& V LaValle y Industries , Inc . bega

n usin g th e ne w resin , the

y incurre d som

e cost s due t o adde

d wast e an d rejects durin

g th e first coupl e o f weeks . Thei

r employee s require d som

e mino r retraining , but

onc e the y ha d becom e comfortabl

e wit h the ne w resin , product s require d a comparable amoun

t o f labo r t o produce . GL&

V LaValle y Industries , Inc . di d no t

incu r an y cost s fromtestin g th e resin . Thei r resin supplier , Ashlan

d Chemica l Company , preformed extensiv e testing on th e ne

w resin t o ensur e ma t i t woul d perfor mabov e th e leve l o f the ol d resin . The

y foun d tha t th e ne w iresi

n outperforme

d th e old resin wit

h regar d t o corrosiveness , thu s GL& V LaValle y Industries , Inc.' s corrosive resistan t product s di d no t requir e recertification . I n additio n t o interna

l education , GL&

V LaValle y Industries , Inc . als o foun

d tha t thei r customers neede

d som e reassurance an

d educatio n abou t th e ne w resi n t o becom e comfortabl e wit

h th e change .

INFORMATIO

N I S ACCURATE^/* * *M- fo>Asku>Ld)

08/31/9 8 MO N

14:2 1 [TI/R X N O 7383 ) _00 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,114] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 4, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at SPS Technology, Waterford, Michigan. 

The petitioners requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of March 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7745 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-21-0000052 

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

TAYA ELIZABETH RIBAS-CESAR,

Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellee v.

SCOTT DAHLQUIST, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee, ROE CORPORATIONS 1-15, JOHN DOES 1-15,

JANE DOES 1-5, ROE NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONS 1-5 and

ROE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 1-5, Defendants,

ALICIA ANN NOBLE, Third Party Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 2CC111000409(3))

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Fujise and Leonard, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal

With Prejudice of Appeal, filed July 14, 2021, by Defendant/

Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Scott Dahlquist,

the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the

appeal and cross-appeal have not been docketed; (2) the parties

stipulate to dismiss the appeal and cross-appeal with prejudice

and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs; (3) the stipulation

is signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal and

cross-appeal; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Hawai#i Rules of

Appellate Procedure Rule 42(a).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation is

approved and the appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed with

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-21-0000052

21-JUL-2021

10:53 AM

Dkt. 39 OAWST
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

prejudice. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and

costs on appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 21, 2021.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Alexa D.M. Fujise

Associate Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41517

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDWARD NEILSEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-14-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Edward Neilsen has filed a

motion and brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Neilsen has not filed a response to counsel’s

motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
Donald GOINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D15-4624

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

MHI HospitalityCorporation 

Williamsburg, Virginia 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-121478) on Form S-8 of MHI Hospitality Corporation of our report, dated March 11,2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of MHI Hospitality Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, owners’ equity and cash flows for the period from December 21,2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule of real estate and accumulated depreciation, and with respect to the combined balance sheet of MHI Hotel Services Group, accounting predecessor to MHI HospitalityCorporation, as of December 31, 2003 and the related combined statements of operations, owners’ equity and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2004 to December 20, 2004 and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31,2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2004, Annual Report on Form 10-K of MHI Hospitality Corporation. 

 

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated and combined financial statements, effective December 21, 2004, MHI Hospitality Corporation acquired all of the outstandingequity interest of Capitol Hotel Associates, LP, LLP, Brownestone Partners, LLC, and Savannah Hotel Associates, LLC in a business combination accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control with respect to the interests acquiredfrom MHI Hotel Service Group and acquisition of minority interests recorded at fair value from third parties. As a result of the acquisition, the consolidated financial information for the period after the acquisition is presented on a differentcost basis than for the periods before the acquisition and, therefore, is not comparable. 

 

/s/ PKF Witt Mares, PLC 

 

Williamsburg, Virginia

March 30, 2005
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theannual report of ECOtality,, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB forthe year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan R. Read,acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,Barry S. Baer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Jonathan R. Read                                   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|      Jonathan  R. Read        |   |
|      Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|      March 28, 2008      |   |
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/ Barry S. Baer                                      |   |
|      Barry  S. Baer           |   |
|      Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| March 28,  2008                                   |   |

 

Created by 10KWizard    www.10KWizard.comSource: ECOTALITY, INC., 10KSB, March 28, 2008

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-452-CV

NED I. SPIRITAS, JANICE SPIRITAS AND	APPELLANT	S

JEFFREY G. SOBEL, AS TRUSTEES OF 

THE NED I. SPIRITAS PROPERTY TRUST	

	V.

SPIRITAS SD 1999 TRUST, SPIRITAS 	APPELLEES

SF 1999 TRUST, SPIRITAS RANCH 

ENTERPRISES, L.L.P., STEVEN SPIRITAS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF 

THE SPIRITAS SF 1999 TRUST AND 

SUSAN DAVIDOFF, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE SPIRITAS 

SD 1999 TRUST	

	----------

	FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “Joint Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  DAUPHINOT, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.  

DELIVERED: February 22, 2007