alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM TEXOIL QUARTERLY REPORT 06/30/00 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,015
<PP&E>                                          75,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (13,489)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,224
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         29
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,175
<SALES>                                         21,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,724
<CGS>                                            7,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,491
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting including a Discussion on Ozone NAAQS 

 Proposal 

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Date: February 18, 2015

On February 12, 2015, staff members from the U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards, held a teleconference with representatives from the Roof Coatings Manufacturers 

Association (RCMA). The EPA staff fielded general questions pertaining to the Agency’s 

November 25, 2015, proposed revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for 

Ozone. 

There were no meeting materials. 

The attendees were as follows:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Carla Oldham

Karen Wesson

Karl Pepple

Heather Simon

RCMA Attendees

John Ferraro

Kelly Franklin

Greg Johns
Rodney C. STAFFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-61

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,096] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 3, 2009 in response to a petition file by a company official on behalf of workers of Tyco Electronics Corporation, Communication and Industrial Solutions Division, Emigsville, Pennsylvania. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of March 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7742 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
J~~TED STq~

®'Z UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY o Q WASHINGTON, D .C. 20460

. Z~~yrqC PROSEG ~ .1 IG~r 1 U LYN Ms. Barbara McMonagle Oreland Auto Service 118 Roesch Avenue Oreland, PA 19075 Dear Ms. McMonagle : OFFICE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION ANDRECOVERY

Thankyou for your letter ofNovember 17, 2010, to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, regarding the Identification ofNon-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Waste (NHSM) proposed rule. In your letter, you express concerns that the rule may impact the current used oil management systemand could have unintended consequences. I appreciate your interest in these important issues. EPA does not want to reduce legitimate recycling of used oil . It is one of many non-hazardous secondary materials discussed in the proposed rule. The preamble specifically discusses the standards for management of used oil used under 40 CFRPart 279. Used oil that meets the criteria is considered "on- specification;" that which does not meet the criteria, "off-specification." Under the proposed rule, onspec used oil is considered a "traditional fuel," (i .e., is considered historically managed as a valuable fuel product rather than as a waste material) . Traditional fuels are not considered solid wastes under the proposed rule. Thus, on-spec used oil would not be considered a solid waste when burned as a fuel under the proposed rule. Off-spec used oil is considered a solid waste under the proposed rule and combustion units burning it would be subject to the appropriate standards under section 129 ofthe Clean Air Act for solid waste incinerators. This proposed approachwould provide an additional measure of control to address the higher level of contaminants that could be present in off-spec used oil . Under the proposed rule, off- spec used oil that is processed into on-spec used oil would not be considered a solid waste. TheAgency will promulgate a final rule based on all available comments, information, and data. Your letter will be entered into the rulemaking docket (EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329) for consideration as the final rule is developed. Again, thank you for your letter. If you have further questions, please contact George Faison of my staffat (703) 305-7652 or via email at faison. eor e _ epa ov. Sincerely,

Suzanne Rudzinski, Acting Director Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Sustainable Use of Resources " Life Cycle Approach to Managing Chemical Risks " Safe, Environmentally Sound Waste Management Internet Address (URL) " http://www .epa.gov
[Cite as Washington Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision, 125 Ohio St.3d 

464, 2010-Ohio-2429.]

WASHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE, v. LUCAS 

COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES;

HOPE MANOR, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS. 

[Cite as Washington Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision, 

125 Ohio St.3d 464, 2010-Ohio-2429.] 

Board of Tax Appeals’ decision reversed and cause remanded. 

(No. 2009-2100 — Submitted May 26, 2010 — Decided June 3, 2010.) 

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2008-V-2081. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed on the 

authority of Toledo Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision, 124 

Ohio St.3d 490, 2010-Ohio-253, 924 N.E.2d 345, and the cause is remanded to 

the Board of Tax Appeals for further proceedings. 

 BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Spengler Nathanson, P.L.L., Michael W. Bragg, and Teresa L. Grigsby, 

for appellee Washington Public Schools Board of Education. 

 Douglas A. Wilkins, for appellants. 

______________________
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Thomas
Kreig, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Ironclad Performance Wear
Corporation.






Dated:
March 11, 2010





/s/
      Thomas KreigThomas
      Kreig,Senior
      Vice President of Finance and
              Principal
      Financial Officer




This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to
the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace.  Such
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
Daniel T. PALCU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-4514

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Michael BAUGE, Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Appellee.

No. 03-3778.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 7, 2004.

Decided: May 17, 2004.

Michael Bauge, Cambridge, LA, pro se.

William C. Purdy, Inga Bumbary-Langston, U.S. Attorneys Office, Des Moines, IA, Melissa M. Santiago, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Kansas City, MO, for Defendants Appellee.

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Bauge appeals the district court’s * order affirming the denial of supplemental security income (SSI). After a hearing, during which the administrative law judge (ALJ) posed a hypothetical question to a vocational expert (VE), the ALJ found Bauge was not eligible for SSI because he could perform a range of sedentary, light, and unskilled jobs. For reversal, Bauge argues the ALJ committed error in discounting his subjective complaints; in ignoring the opinion of Clark Borland (with whom Bauge was involved in vocational rehabilitation), who questioned whether Bauge could work competitively; and in omitting from the hypothetical the effects of Bauge’s diarrhea and resulting need to leave his work station at unscheduled times. We affirm.

The ALJ was entitled to discredit Bauge’s subjective complaints based on his asserted daily activities, *see Dunahoo v. Apfel,*241 F.3d 1033, 1038-39 (8th Cir. *662001), and the ALJ also properly relied on other relevant factors, including exaggeration of symptoms, lack of significant work history, and the effectiveness of at least some of Bauge’s prescribed medications, *see Jones v. Callahan,*122 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (8th Cir.1997); *Comstock v. Chafer,*91 F.3d 1143, 1147 (8th Cir.1996); *Polaski v. Heckler,*739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir.1984). As to Borland’s letter, the ALJ did not discuss it in any detail, but confirmed its receipt and stated he had considered all the documents in the record. *See Craig v. Apfel,*212 F.3d 433, 436 (8th Cir.2000) (ALJ is not required to discuss all evidence, and failure to cite specific evidence does not indicate it was not considered). Finally, the ALJ’s hypothetical included the claimant’s need to have access to the restroom and his several gastrointestinal diseases, and the ALJ expressly found Bauge’s subjective complaints not credible to the extent they were inconsistent with the ALJ’s no-disability determination. *See Haggard v. Apfel,*175 F.3d 591, 595 (8th Cir.1999) (hypothetical is sufficient if it sets forth impairments ALJ accepts as true).

Bauge’s remaining arguments provide no basis for reversal. We thus affirm the district court.

*

 The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2444 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2444

     To reduce temporarily the duty on certain ceramic frit rings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce temporarily the duty on certain ceramic frit rings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CERAMIC FRIT RINGS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Ceramic frit rings  6.5%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        or powder                                                          31/2015.......
                        composed of
                        dysprosium oxide,
                        dysprosium
                        monosilicate, and
                        mullite for
                        sealing discharge
                        lamp arc tubes
                        (CAS Nos. 12161-
                        58-9, 235-295-7,
                        1302-93-8, 215-
                        113-2, 1308-87-8,
                        and 215-164-0)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3207.40.5000)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2
Kelly Grant JONES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2508

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60758 Conference Calendar

DOUGLASS WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STEVE PUCKETT; EDWARD HARGETT; ANN LEE; JOAN ROSS; LARRY HARDY; ANTHONY COX; WINFRED HILL; FLOYDD BASS; SGT. SMITH; SGT. SPICES; SGT. JOHNSON; PAM ROBERISON; CASE MAG. BARNETT; CASE MGR WATSON; CASE MGR. PRESLEY; CASE MGR. BEASLEY; CASE MGR. JOHN, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95-CV-347-D-D

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Douglass Williams, Mississippi prisoner # 33706, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to state a cause of action. Williams argues that he was subjected to excessive force in violation ofNo. 96-60758 - 2 - the Eighth Amendment and that he did not receive due process of law at a prison disciplinary hearing. We have reviewed Williams’s brief and the record and AFFIRM for essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court. Williams v. Puckett , No. 4:95cv347-D-D (N.D. Miss. Oct. 17, 1996).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

*Time and Date:*

9 a.m.-5 p.m., April 28, 2009 (Closed).

9 a.m.-5 p.m., April 29, 2009 (Closed).

*Place:*                         W Hotel, 188 14th Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30361, Telephone: (404) 892-6000.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “CDC Grants for Public Health Research Dissertation, Panel C, FOA PAR07-231.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Christine J. Morrison, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of the Director, Office of the Chief Science Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-3098.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: April 7, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-8333 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
STATE EX REL. Timothy Cardell THOMAS v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2016-KH-2162

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied; moot.
EXHIBIT 10.1

                      [ARMADA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LOGO]
                        254 S Ronald Reagan Blvd, Ste 134
                               Longwood, Fl 32750
                                  321-295-7816
                               866-773-8630 (efax)

September 28, 2011

Mr. Robert M. Greenway
225 King George Street
Charleston, SC 29492

RE: Letter of Invitation and appointment

Dear Bob;

This letter shall constitute an invitation to join Armada Sports & Entertainment
(DOMK) as a member of the Board of Directors. The Company is developing a series
of golf events known as The Golf Championships, which are a series of made for
television niche sports programs.

The terms of your engagement are as follows:

1. The commence date of your engagement as a director will be October 1, 2011
for a term ending on October 15, 2012.

2. Your responsibilities as a director shall be to render the following services
to the Company:

--   Attend quarterly regularly scheduled telephonic meetings of the board
--   Attend in person, the annual meeting of the board
--   Attend an initial telephonic conference with other board members for
     introductory purposes
--   You agree to leverage and or provide opportunities as a result of your
     relationships developed over the years, to maximize the economic benefit to
     the company and its shareholders.

4. Your compensation for service to the Company by serving as a member will be
as follows:

Cash Compensation: $25,000 annually, payable in four quarterly installments
beginning with the quarter ending January 31, 2012
Stock Compensation 100,000 shares restricted common
<PAGE>
Stock options of the public company will be granted as determined by mutual
agreement as discussed.

All expenses paid for you and your wife to the site of the annual meeting of the
Board, which will be held at the location of one of the Company's events.

It was discussed and agreed that any future service compensation beyond the term
of this appointment will be based upon the financial and market status of the
Company at that time.

5. The Company shall maintain D&O Insurance of $5M during the term of your
service as a member of the Board of Directors.

If these terms are acceptable, please indicate your acceptance below and return
to me either by PDF file or by fax to 407-349-1511.

Also, please forward the following when you return the letter acceptance:

A picture to be used in our corporate materials. A JPEG or GIF file is
preferred.

I look forward to receiving your acceptance of the appointment and moving
forward on this exciting project with you.

Sincerely,                                   Accepted:


/s/ Tom Kidd                                 /s/ Robert M. Greenway
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Tom Kidd, CEO                                Robert M. Greenway
Chairman