alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 





Exhibit 10.30




AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING NOTE





THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of this 18th day of December, 2007 by
and between ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP., a Colorado corporation, having an office at 700
Seventeenth Street, Suite 1200, Denver, Colorado 80202 (“Maker”) and GDBA INVESTMENTS, LLLP, a
Colorado limited liability limited partnership, having an office at 1440 Blake Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202 (“Holder”).



WITNESSETH:




WHEREAS, Maker has executed and delivered to Holder a Revolving Note dated March 30, 2007 (the
“Note”) to evidence Maker’s indebtedness to Holder in the principal amount of Three Million Dollars
($3,000,000.00); and



WHEREAS, Maker and Holder wish to clarify and define certain terms and provisions of the Note;



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth herein above, and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, intending
to be legally bound, the parties hereto do hereby mutually and expressly understand and agree as
follows:



1. Maturity Date. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Note, the maturity date
of this Note shall be June 30, 2008.



2. Representations and Warranties. Maker hereby represents and warrants, and Holder
hereby acknowledges and agrees, that (a) no default has occurred under the Note, (b) except as
provided herein, the Note has not been modified or amended, and (c) the execution and delivery of
this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action of the parties hereto.



3. Drawing Provisions. Maker shall be required to make formal written draw requests
of Holder prior to any future funding under the Note. Such draw requests shall be subject to
Holder approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Such requests shall be in the same or
similar form as may be required by Maker’s Senior Lenders; provided, however, that Holder reserves
the right to require additional, commercially reasonable information prior to approving such draws.



7. Ratification. Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms
of the Note are ratified and reaffirmed and remain in full force and effect.



8. Binding Provisions. The terms and conditions of this Amendment shall
be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors
and assigns.



9. Governing Law. The terms and conditions of this Amendment shall be
governed by the applicable laws of the State of Colorado.


 


 









 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have each caused this Amendment to be executed by their
respective duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MAKER:
 

ACROSS AMERICA REAL ESTATE CORP.,

a Colorado corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	                         /s/
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	HOLDER:
 

GDBA INVESTMENTS, LLLP,

a Colorado limited liability limited partnership

 	 
	 	By:  	                    /s/
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:
# Official Journal L 392/30 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 392 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4930 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 392

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4930 December 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 1992/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community
   (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Regulation (EC) No 1992/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community
   (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09294**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09294\09294_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 09294\09294_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09294\09294_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09294\09294_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09294\09294_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09294\09294_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09294\09294_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09294\Supporting Documents\09294_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09294\Supporting Documents\09294_Part A Section 5 EHP Water Balances.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey
1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
STATE EX REL. Stanley DRAKE v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0456

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his second application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Roland A. PRENATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2378

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 17, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 18, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2443 Lower Tribunal No. 20-17923

________________ 

### Sukkah Miami Beach Acquisitions, LLC ,

Appellant,

vs. 

### Zurich American Insurance Company, et al. ,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Thomas, Judge. Reed Smith LLP, and R. Hugh Lumpkin, Christopher T. Kuleba, and Garrett S. Nemeroff, for appellant. Akerman LLP, and Gerald B. Cope, Jr., and Kristen M. Fiore (Tallahassee); and Clyde & Co US LLP, and Patrick Hofer (Washington, D.C.), for appellee Zurich American Insurance Company. Zelle LLP, and Christine M. Renella, for appellees Everest Indemnity Insurance Company and Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company.2

Carlton Fields, P.A., and Steven J. Brodie, Joseph H. Lang Jr., Heidi Hudson Raschke, and Andrew K. Daechsel, for appellee Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP, and Perry R. Goodman (Fort Lauderdale); Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, and Tracy A. Jurgus; Wiggin and Dana LLP, and Jonathan M. Freiman (New Haven, CT), for appellees HDI Global Specialty SE, Western World Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, Evanston Insurance Company, Navigators Specialty Insurance Company, and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London.
Before HENDON, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Commodore, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 342 So. 3d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).
Keith Bernard NELSON, DOC #504244, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2209

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cyber Informatix, Inc.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com









Exhibit 10.1
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2473 

To prohibit the establishment of new units of the National Forest System, 

National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System, National Wild 

and Scenic Rivers System, National Trails System, National Wilderness 

Preservation System, or any other system established by Federal law, 

or any national conservation or national recreation area without approval 

of the applicable State legislature. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. PAUL, and Mr. 

HATCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the establishment of new units of the National 

Forest System, National Park System, National Wildlife 

Refuge System, National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 

National Trails System, National Wilderness Preservation System, or any other system established by Federal 

law, or any national conservation or national recreation 

area without approval of the applicable State legislature. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2473 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Land Designa3 tion Requirements Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. STATE APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR FEDERAL LAND 

5 DESIGNATIONS. 

6 (a) DEFINITION OF COVERED UNIT.—In this section, 

7 the term ‘‘covered unit’’ means— 

8 (1) a unit of the National Forest System, Na9 tional Park System, National Wildlife Refuge Sys10 tem, National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, Na11 tional Trails System, National Wilderness Preserva12 tion System, or any other system established by 

13 Federal law; 

14 (2) a national monument; or 

15 (3) any national conservation or national recre16 ation area. 

17 (b) PROHIBITION.—A covered unit shall not be estab18 lished unless the legislature of the State in which the pro19 posed covered unit is located has approved the establish20 ment of the covered unit. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Unassociated Document


EXECUTION VERSION


GUARANTY







I, Michael Campbell, being duly sworn, do hereby certify to West Ventures, LLC (the “Lender”), in connection with that certain Senior Secured Note Agreement, dated as of the date hereof (the “Note Agreement”), between Resource Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Lender, that, so long as any principal or interest remains outstanding under the Note Agreement, I will not knowingly and intentionally take any action as an officer or director of the Company that is fraudulent, willful misconduct, misrepresentative or that would cause any court of competent jurisdiction to enter against the Company or RHI Mineração LTDA a decree or order for relief in any voluntary or involuntary case under the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §101, et seq., or under any other applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law now or hereafter in effect, or to cause any winding up, liquidation, or other such other similar relief to be granted to the Company or RHI Mineração LTDA under any applicable federal or state law.


 


 In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has executed this Guaranty as of this 28th day of September, 2011.


 



	  	  
	  	
 
/s/ Michael Campbell




	  	
Michael Campbell


	  	  
	
Sworn to before me


	
this ___ day of September, 2011


	  
	
_____________________________


	
[Notary Public]


	  
	
Acknowledged


	  
	
WEST VENTURES, LLC


	  
	
 
/s/ Ari Hirt                            




	
By: Ari Hirt                           


	
Its: Portfolio Manager
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Texas Department of Transportation

Appellate case number: 01-17-00358-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-68342

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

On May 18, 2017, relator, Texas Department of Transportation, filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay pending mandamus, requesting that we 

stay the trial court’s “Order on Production of TXDOT Documents Reviewed in Camera” 

signed May 4, 2017. We grant relator’s emergency motion to stay. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.10(b). This stay is effective until the case in this court is finally decided or the court 

otherwise orders the stay lifted. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(c).

Further, the court requests that the real parties in interest respond to the petition for 

writ of mandamus. It is ordered that the response of any interested party, if any, shall be 

due no later than 20 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 19, 2017
**Exhibit 23.6**

 

**CONSENT****OF****METPRO MANAGEMENT INC****.******

 

The undersigned hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-132294, No. 333-147214, No. 333-164982, No. 333-173881, No. 333-179827, No. 333-186917, No. 333-193061 and 333-201793) of NextSource Materials Inc., of references to the undersigned’s name and Metpro Management Inc.’s name and to the use of the scientific and technical information, including any reserve or resource estimates, from the technical report titled “Molo Feasibility Study - National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on the Molo Graphite Project located near the Village of Fotadrevo in the Province of Toliara, Madagascar” dated effective July 13, 2017 (the “Technical Information”), including extracts from or summaries of the Technical Information that are contained in the annual report on Form 10-K of NextSource Materials Inc.

 

 

October 20, 2017

 

Metpro Management Inc.

 

 

| /S/ O. Peters                     |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   |
| Name: O. Peters

Title: President |   |
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 3 - AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


                                    AMENDED
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

Community Bancshares, Inc. a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Community Bancshares, Inc.
a resolution was duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and placing it before the special meeting of the stockholders of said
corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

    RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be
    amended by changing Section 4.01 of Article thereof numbered "Article IV" so
    that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:

    "4.01 The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock ("Shares")
    which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 20,200,000,
    consisting of the following classes:

                (1) 20,000,000 shares of common stock, $.10 par value per share
                    ("Common Stock"),

                (2) 200,000 shares of preferred stock, $.10 par value per share
                    ("Preferred Stock").

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, the
special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and
held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statue were voted in favor of the amendment.

THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provision of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

FOURTH: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by
reason of said amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Community Bancshares, Inc. has caused this certificate
to be signed by Kennon R. Patterson, Sr., it President, and Bishop K. Walker,
Jr., Secretary, this 10th day of September, 1998.

                                      BY:        /s/ Kennon R. Patterson, Sr.
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                        President

                                      ATTESTED:    /s/ Bishop K. Walker, Jr.
                                                -------------------------------
                                                         Secretary


                                       15
EXHIBIT 11.1



Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Earnings



Community Bancshares, Inc.

Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Common Share



The following tabulation presents the calculation of basic and fully diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.



|                                                     |  |                                     |           |      |   |           |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- | -
|                                                     |  | For the three months endedMarch 31, |          
|                                                     |  | 2004                                |           | 2003 |  
|Earnings (losses) on common shares                   |  | $                                   | 55,043    |      | $ | (549,110  | )
|                                                     |  |                                     |           |      |   |           |  
|Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic   |  |                                     | 7,849,078 |      |   | 4,640,527 |  
|                                                     |  |                                     |           |      |   |           |  
|Earnings (loss) per common share - basic             |  | $                                   | .01       |      | $ | (0.12     | )
|                                                     |  |                                     |           |      |   |           |  
|Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted |  |                                     | 7,881,302 |      |   | 4,640,527 |  
|                                                     |  |                                     |           |      |   |           |  
|Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted           |  | $                                   | 0.01      |      | $ | (0.12     | )
|                                                     |  |                                     |           |      |   |           |
|   | (1)    The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)    The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Winland. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               | Winland      Electronics, Inc. |                          |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                               |                           |                          |   |
| Date:       November 12, 2008 | By:                            | /s/ Glenn      A. Kermes |   |
|                               |                           | Glenn      A. Kermes          |   |
|                               |                           | Chief      Financial Officer  |   |
|                               |                           |                          |   |