alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1407 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1407

   To amend the Small Business Act to eliminate certain requirements 
relating to the award of construction subcontracts within the county or 
                         State of performance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2023

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, and Ms. Hirono) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                 on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Act to eliminate certain requirements 
relating to the award of construction subcontracts within the county or 
                         State of performance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF REQUIREMENT RELATING TO AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION 
              SUBCONTRACTS WITHIN COUNTY OR STATE OF PERFORMANCE.

    Paragraph (11) of section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
637(a)) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Valley High
Mining Company (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:





(1)           The
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
March 31, 2010





/s/
John Thomas Hickey


John
Thomas Hickey


Chief
Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) &


Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Magnetek, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending December 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, DavidP. Reiland, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Marty J.Schwenner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   |                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |                                        |
|   | /s/  David P.  Reiland                 |   |
|   | David P. Reiland                            |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer      |
|   |                                        |
|   |                                        |
|   |                                        |
|   | /s/  Marty J.  Schwenner               |   |
|   | Marty J. Schwenner                          |
|   | Vice-President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Dated: February 8,2008

 

 

 

----
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Application Under the Equal Access ) 

to Justice Act of -- ) 

) 

Government Contracting Resources, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. NNK080B12C ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59162 

Jennifer M. Miller, Esq. 

Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP 

Raleigh, NC 

Scott W. Barber, Esq. 

NASA Chief Trial Attorney 

Charles Alexander Vinson, Esq. 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

Miata L. Coleman, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Kennedy Space Center, FL 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to the parties' 29 April 2015 joint motion to dismiss appeal with 

prejudice stating that the parties have settled both the quantum portion of the appeal as 

well as the applicant's request for fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in ASBCA 

No. 59162, ASBCA No. 59162 is hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to 

reinstatement only in the event the settlement is not consummated. Any request to 

reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within 120 days of the date of this Order. 

Dated: 1 May 2015 

~If; MARK A. MELNICK 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals on an application for fees and other expenses 

incurred in connection with ASBCA No. 59162, Appeal of Government Contracting 

Resources, Inc., rendered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 504. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
TOUCHSTONE
SOFTWARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES










Exhibit
32        Certifications Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of TouchStone Software
Corporation for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason K. Raza,
President and Chief Executive Officer of TouchStone Software Corporation, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1      
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
the financialcondition and results of operations of TouchStone Software
Corporation





Date:
       May 13, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Jason
      K. RazaJason
      K. RazaPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
documentation authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in the typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by the Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification “accompanies” the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB, irrespective of a general incorporation language contained in such
filings).
Exhibit 4.1



|    
|----
|LOGO

Exhibit 4.1

MNTX

MANITEX
INTERNATIONAL, INC.

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

COMMON STOCK

CUSIP 563420 10 8

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

IS THE OWNER OF

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF
MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly
authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate duly endorsed.

This Certificate is not valid until countersigned
and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed in facsimile by its duly authorized officers.

Dated

David H Gransee

Chief Financial Officer

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CORPORATE

SEAL 2003

MICHIGAN

David J. Langevin

Chairman of the Board

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:

AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

BY

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

AMERICAN BANK NOTE COMPANY

711 ARMSTRONG LANE

COLUMBIA, TENNESSEE 38401

(931) 388-3003

SALES: JAYNE DICKINSON 706-385-9112

7 / LIVE JOBS / M / MANITEX 30123 FC

PRODUCTION COORDINATOR CORBIN MATLOCK 931-490-7660

PROOF OF; MAY 21, 2008

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

TSB 30123 FC

OPERATOR: AP

Rev. 1

PLEASE INITIAL THE APPROPRIATE SELECTION FOR THIS PROOF:

OK AS IS

OK
WITH CHANGES

MAKE CHANGES AND SEND ANOTHER PROOF
#### Raul FLORES-LIMA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-71437.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 20, 2004.

Raul Flores-Lima, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ethan B. Kanter, Esq., Ana M. Kocur, *787Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Raul Flores-Lima, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings to apply for an adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b). We review a denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion, *Martinez v. Ashcroft,*363 F.3d 1022, 1024 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Flores-Lima filed his motion to reopen on August 19, 2002, more than 90 days after the BIA’s May 17, 2002 decision. Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen on grounds of untimeliness. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(C)(i) (motions to reopen “must be filed no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered in the proceeding sought to be Reopened”); *Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2657

PAMELA A. KILLIAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-97-97-5-V) Submitted: April 13, 1999 Decided: April 30, 1999 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Walter B. Patterson, LEWIS & PATTERSON, Statesville, North Carolina; Phil M. Teague, TEAGUE & CARPENTER, Statesville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Joseph L. Brinkley, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Pamela Killian appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security on Killian’s claim of disability under the Social Security Act. See Killian v. Apfel , No. CA-97-97-5-V (W.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversibleerror. Killian fails to show that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) was not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Ecotality, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan R. Read, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Barry S. Baer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jonathan R. Read

Jonathan R. Read

Chief Executive Officer

June 8, 2007







/s/ Barry S. Baer

Barry S. Baer

Chief Financial Officer

June 8, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         285,747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,556,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,966
<INVENTORY>                                  1,848,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,135,011
<PP&E>                                       3,985,079
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,809,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,522,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,230,482
<BONDS>                                      2,341,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,225
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,911,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,522,468
<SALES>                                      5,041,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,041,055
<CGS>                                        3,592,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,190,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               390,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (19,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (109,089)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                648,926
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            648,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   648,926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Jose Dolores RAMIREZ, DOC# Y58554, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-40

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph W. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-815

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
        23.2
  **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No.
        333-137033) on Form S-8 of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. of our report
        dated April 2, 2007 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial
        statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Innovative
        Card Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
 
 SINGER
        LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
 
 Los
        Angeles, California
 April
        2,
        2007
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 067

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




Date:  February 14, 2006               /s/ Tami J Story
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Tami J Story
                                       Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward STANLEY, aka Edward Johnson; et al., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-57026.

D.C. No. CV-02-00976-ER, CR-96-01140-ER-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Stephen G. Wolfe, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.

David Z. Chesnoff, Goodman *&*Chesnoff, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendanb-Appeliant.

*181Before BROWNING, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Federal prisoner Edward Stanley appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion following his guilty plea and sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole for conspiracy to commit murder-for-hire in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958. We granted a certificate of appealability solely “as to the issue whether appellant’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary.”1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2258. We review de novo, *Sanchez v. United States,*50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm.

Stanley contends that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary because the government withheld exculpatory information under *Brady v. Maryland,*373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). However, there is not a reasonable probability under an objective standard that, but for the newly discovered evidence about the government’s informant, Stanley “would have refused to plead and would have gone to trial,” *Sanchez,*50 F.3d at 1454, because the newly discovered information was cumulative of information that Stanley knew at the time of his guilty plea.

The district court acted within its discretion in denying Stanley’s § 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing because the files and records conclusively show that Stanley is not entitled to relief. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2255; *see also Shah v. United States,*878 F.2d 1156, 1159 (9th Cir.1989).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. We do not consider any arguments outside the scope of the certificate of appealability. *See, e.g., United States v. Christakis,*238 F.3d 1164, 1168 n. 5 (9th Cir.2001).
EXHIBIT 24.1
  POWER
    OF ATTORNEY
  Form 10-K Form 10-K
    Signature

Title

DateAlan
    R. Spachman

Chairman of the Board

03/08/11Joseph
    E. Consolino

Director

03/08/11Theodore
    H. Elliott, Jr.

Director

03/08/11Gary
    J. Gruber

Director

03/08/11Keith
    A. Jensen

Director

03/08/11Vito
    Peraino

Director

03/08/11Donald
    D. Larson

Director

03/08/11David
    W. Michelson

Director, Chief Executive
    Officer,President

03/08/11
Exhibit
32.2




Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Asia Select Acquisition III Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Min Kuang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Min KuangMin
      KuangPrincipal
      Financial OfficerJune
      29, 2010