alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20479

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PAUL JAMES SANDERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-796-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paul James Sanders appeals his conviction and sentence for

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1). Citing the Supreme Court’s decisions in

Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848 (2000); United States v.

Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000); and United States v. Lopez, 514

U.S. 549 (1995), Sanders argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) can no

longer constitutionally be construed to cover the intrastate

possession of a firearm merely due to the fact that it traveled
No. 03-20479

-2-

across state lines at some point in the past. Accordingly,

Sanders argues that the evidence, which stipulated that the

firearm he possessed in Texas was manufactured in California, was

insufficient to establish the interstate commerce element of 18

U.S.C. § 922(g) and thus insufficient to support his conviction. 

Sanders raises his argument solely to preserve it for

possible Supreme Court review. As he acknowledges, his argument

is foreclosed by existing Fifth Circuit precedent. See United

States v. Cavazos, 288 F.3d 706, 712 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 

537 U.S. 910 (2002); United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513,

518 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1150 (2002); United

States v. Gresham, 118 F.3d 258, 264-65 (5th Cir. 1997); United

States v. Kuban, 94 F.3d 971, 973 (5th Cir. 1996); United States

v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-43 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Because the argument is foreclosed, the Government has moved

for a summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment. The

motion is GRANTED. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Filed 10/19/20 P. v. Pe pper CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ADRIANA C. PEPPER,

Defendant and Appellant. D077124

(Super. Ct. No. SCS300220 )

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Francis M. Devaney, Judge. Affirmed.

Justin Behravesh, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Adriana C. Pepper pleaded guilty to one count of vehicular

manslaughter (Pen. Code

, § 192, subd. (c)(1)). The remaining charges and

allegations were dismissed. The parties agreed Pepper would receive

probation and the court wo uld consider alternatives to custody. Pepper was

granted probation for three years. The court considered but rejected

alternatives to custody and imposed 365 days in custody as a condition of2

probation. The court made subsequent orders to permit adminis tration of

certain prescribed medication to Pepper while she was in jail.

Pepper filed a timely notice of appeal but did not obtain a certificate of

probable cause.

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979)

25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ) indicating he has not been able to identify any

arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the

record for error as mandated by Wende . We offered Pepper the opportunity to

file her own brief on appeal, but she has not responded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Pepper drove a vehicle in a grossly negligent manner causing the death

of another.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks

the court to review the record for error. To assist the c ourt in its review, and

in compliance with Anders v

. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 ( Anders ), counsel

has identified the following possible issues that were considered in evaluating

the potential merits of this appeal:

1. Whether there was a factual basi s for the guilty plea;

2. Whether appellant was properly advised of her constitutional rights

before entering her guilty plea;

3. Whether the sentence imposed was authorized; and

4. Whether the court erred in sending appellant to custody instead of

an alternative.

We have reviewed the entire record as mandated by Wende and Anders.

We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal.

Competent counsel has represen ted Pepper on this appeal.3 DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

O'ROURKE, J.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC MANSFIELD HELIFLIGHT, INC.



### v. CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT Complainant,

Resnondent. FAA Docket No.16-14-06

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEriforcementProceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuantto 14 CFRPart 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determinationwill be issued in this matter is hereby extendedto December 11, 2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.
Randall S. Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance and ManagementAnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on August____,S_, 2015, I caused to be placed inthe United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe foregoing document addressed to: FORRESPONDENT Pablo 0. Nuesch Anjali G. Patel Spiegel and McDiarmid, LLP 1875 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 FOR COMPLAINANT Benjamin H. Klein The Klein Law Firm, LLC 61 Broadway, Suite 2125 New York, NY 10006 Copyto: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-600 FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0-100

Aline Torgerson Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
# Official Journal L 351I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 351I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6322 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 351I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6322 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1536 of 22 October 2020 of implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/796 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1537 of 22 October 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1536 of 22 October 2020 of implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/796 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1537 of 22 October 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**HO%** Y'alterC. Koodward,Pnge 14

no law hereinafter enaoted shall apply to then U&S they be esgecinllydeoignzted therein. Yhe nap. *Smtar nal benefit ooolM.yn fs not contained in Koust? Bill 373. The tenz Vaacns or Ye.'seonlog~ does not apj-xar

in IIouae I3111 3?3. 

### it ia the questions X%hcrorore, you arc reoapeottully advised that ol:inion

of thin .dc;uirtmnt +,k.t your three should eaoh be anewered in the negative,

ATTORNEYGENERfiOJ'TEXAS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
     CONSOLIATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
     COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FORM 10-Q/A, WHICH IS ATTACHED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ENTIRETY BY THE REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000762634
<NAME>                                       EARTH SEARCH SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            46,031
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  46,031
<PP&E>                                         1,038,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                    12,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,162,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,334,324
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      67,941,993 
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,038,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,162,064
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (1,073,812)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (40,536)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,114,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,114,348)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,114,348)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.02)
        


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 439/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 439 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5925 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 439

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5925 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2016/C 439/01 | Recommendations to national courts and tribunals, in relation to the initiation of preliminary ruling proceedings | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

Court of Justice of the European Union

2016/C 439/01

Recommendations to national courts and tribunals, in relation to the initiation of preliminary ruling proceedings

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
E. Y., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3550

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seitel, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Monson, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 9, 2010/s/

Robert D. MonsonRobert D. Monson President and
Principal Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906,
has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Salina TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2967

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION 

I, James W. Landrum, President, certifythat: 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Golden Chief Resources, Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make          the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements          were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly          report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and          procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the          registrant and we have: 

    a)                 designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others          within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly          report is being prepared; 

    b)                 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this report based on such evaluation; and 

    c)                 disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to          materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial          reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over          financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee          of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent          function): 

    a)                 all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

    b)                 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting. 

Date: June 24, 2004 

By:/s/ James W. Landrum
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Claire S. BeanClaire S. BeanChief Financial Officer
----

 

Exhibit 32.2

 

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Seitel, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marcia H. Kendrick, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
Kevin Lonell SQUAIR, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-873

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 6, 2018

Michael A. Graves, Public Defender and Eric R. Tippin, Assistant Public Defender, Brooksville, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the June 21, 2017, judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 15-CF-001622, in the Circuit Court in and for Hernando County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Placido H. Canta, Chief Financial Officer of Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.,
the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   March 29, 2006                        /S/ Placido H. Canta
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Placido H. Canta,
                                             Chief Financial Officer of Manager
                                             Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.
Statement Pursuant to
Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
undersigned, Daniel Dror, Chairman & CEO of International American
Technologies, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
with respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report of Form 10-KSB/A for the year
ended December 31, 2006.






The
undersigned certifies that the above annual report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the above annual report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of International American Technologies, Inc.
and results of its operations.






Date:
March 18, 2008


Daniel
Dror


Chairman
& CEO /s/ Daniel
Dror