alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013086EN.01002702.xml

| 23.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/27

---

Action brought on 4 February 2013 — ANKO v Commission

(Case T-64/13)

2013/C 86/46

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopion, Emporiou kai Viomikhanias (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Khristianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare that the applicant does not have to refund as wrongly paid the sum which the Commission paid to it for the DOC@HAND project; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the applicant does not have to refund as wrongly paid the sum which the Commission paid to it for the DOC@HAND project;

| — | declare that the applicant does not have to pay the Commission liquidated damages for the DOC@HAND project; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the applicant does not have to pay the Commission liquidated damages for the DOC@HAND project;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action concerns liability of the Commission under contract No 508015 relating to the carrying out of the project ‘Knowledge Sharing and Decision Support for Healthcare Professionals’ (DOC@HAND), pursuant to Article 272 TFEU. Specifically, the applicant submits that, although it performed its contractual obligations, the Commission, in breach of the aforementioned contract, of the principle of good faith, of the prohibition of the abuse of rights, and of proportionality, sought reimbursement of the sums paid to it.

For that reason, the applicant submits, first, that it does not have to refund as wrongly paid the whole of the sum which the Commission paid to it for the DOC@HAND project and, second, that it does not have to pay the Commission liquidated damages for the DOC@HAND project.

---
Robert CASTANO, Appellant, v. FLORIDA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2683

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 03-14-00407-CR OFFENSE: 31.03

Jerryl Robinson v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Comal

\0+t-/S

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 207th District Court

DATE: 7/22/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: CR2013-349

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Jerryl Robinson v. The Stat<2 of Texas

Petition

IOV/-/5"

PRO $£

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

RcFutnrT) JUDGE:

DATE: Av/sRpo/T

JUDGE: fj*\ UiAu^*^-~

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

•

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Document

EXHIBIT 10(l-9)


SEVENTH AMENDMENT
TO THE
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
OF EMCOR GROUP, INC.


WHEREAS, the EMCOR Group, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan was adopted in 2005 and has since been amended (as amended, the LTIP);
    
WHEREAS, Section 8.1 of the LTIP provided that the Board of Directors of EMCOR Group, Inc. (the “Board”) may amend the LTIP, subject to the terms of Section 8.1; and 


WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the LTIP shall be further amended as provide below.


NOW, THEREFORE,     the LTIP is hereby amended as follows:


1.    Section 2 of the LTIP is hereby amended to add the following paragraph to the definition of Earnings Per Share:


“Earnings Per Share” for a Three Year Applicable Period commencing on or after January 1, 2022 shall mean the aggregate of the diluted earnings per share of the Company’s Common Stock for each of such three years, as reported in the Company’s “Consolidated Statements of Operations” for such years in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; provided, however, that in computing net income to arrive at any such year’s earnings per share there shall be excluded from the calculation of such net income (a) non-cash charges associated with the write-down of balance sheet values of assets, (b) investment banking, consulting, legal, and accounting fees and related disbursements directly associated with any proposed or consummated (i) acquisition or investment or (ii) sale or disposition of Company assets or securities, (c) the effect of any changes in statutory tax rates from those in effect on the date that the EPSO is established, (d) restructuring charges due to sale or closure of a subsidiary’s business, (e) the cumulative effect of any change in accounting principles, (f) charges associated with withdrawal liabilities relating to multi-employer pension plans and lump sum type surcharges (as opposed to increases in hourly contribution rates) assessed by multi-employer pension plans, to ameliorate underfunding in their respective plans, (g) income or loss from discontinued operations, and (h) costs and expenses related to COVID-19 diagnostic testing; and provided further, however, that the Compensation Committee may, within the first 90 days of an Applicable Three Year Period, adjust any such period’s Earnings Per Share to omit the impact on such Earnings Per Share of extraordinary items, gains or losses on the acquisition or disposal of a business, and/or unusual or infrequently occurring events and transactions.”


2.      Except as hereinabove amended, the LTIP, as previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the 23rd day of February, 2022.
                            															
				EMCOR GROUP, INC.
					
				By: 	/s/ Anthony J. Guzzi
					Chairman, President and CEO
# Euroopan unionin C 38I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 038I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 64. vuosikerta3. helmikuu 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 038I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

64. vuosikerta3. helmikuu 2021

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Neuvosto |
| 2021/C 38 I/01 | Peruutusilmoitus | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Neuvosto

2021/C 38 I/01

Peruutusilmoitus

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Neuvosto

| 3.2.2021 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2021

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 38/1

---

PERUUTUSILMOITUS

(2021/C 38 I/01)

Euroopan unionin virallisessa lehdessä (1) julkaistu ilmoitus avoinna olevasta toimesta CONS/AD/167/21 on peruutettu.

---

(1)  EUVL C 29 A, 26.1.2021, s. 1.

---
Andrew GUTSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D16-5395 2D16-5666

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Vincent Eugene DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3938

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ronnie JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Ronnie Johnson, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1480 No. SC17-1484

Supreme Court of Florida.

[March 27, 2018]

Charles G. White of Charles G. White, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Melissa J. Roca, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

*631We have for review Ronnie Johnson's appeals of the circuit court's orders denying Johnson's motions filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Johnson's motions sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida* , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). This Court stayed Defendant's appeals pending the disposition of *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock* , Johnson responded to this Court's orders to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in these cases.

After reviewing Johnson's responses to the orders to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Johnson is not entitled to relief. Johnson was sentenced to death for the murder of Lee Arthur Lawrence following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of seven to five. *Johnson v. State* , 696 So.2d 317, 320 (Fla. 1997). Johnson was also sentenced to death for the murder of Tequila Larkins following a jury's recommendation for death by a vote of nine to three. *Johnson v. State* , 696 So.2d 326, 329 (Fla. 1997). Both of Johnson's sentences of death became final in 1998. *Johnson v. Florida* , 522 U.S. 1120, 118 S.Ct. 1062, 140 L.Ed.2d 123 (1998) ; *Johnson v. Florida* , 522 U.S. 1095, 118 S.Ct. 892, 139 L.Ed.2d 878 (1998). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Johnson's sentences of death. *See**Hitchcock* , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Johnson's motions.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Johnson, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock* .
<PAGE>


Exhibit 11 - Statements Re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings


                           Community Bancshares, Inc.
                   Computation of Net Income per Common Share

The following tabulation presents the calculation of basic and fully diluted
earnings per common share for the Three Months Ended, March 31, 2002 and 2001.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                       For the Three Months Ended,
                                                                                          2002            2001
                                                                                     -------------   --------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>             <C>
Reported net income...............................................................   $   1,232,513   $     805,090
                                                                                     =============   =============

Earnings on common shares.........................................................   $   1,232,513   $     805,090
                                                                                     =============   =============

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic................................       4,625,949       4,501,415
                                                                                     =============   =============

Earnings per common share- basic
   Income from continuing operations..............................................   $        0.27   $        0.18
                                                                                     =============   =============

   Net income.....................................................................   $        0.27   $        0.18
                                                                                     =============   =============


Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted..............................       4,625,949       4,531,516
                                                                                     =============   =============

Earnings per common share- diluted
   Income from continuing operations..............................................   $        0.27   $        0.18
                                                                                     =============   =============

   Net income.....................................................................   $        0.27   $        0.18
                                                                                     =============   =============
</TABLE>


              [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank]

                                       1
Helen B. MONZON, Appellant, v. Antonio MONZON, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2915

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-J7
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-J7


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                   Dated:  March 28, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                              Dated:  March 28, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
Valerie FULTON, Appellant, v. Judith BRANCATO, Dean C. Fulton, Fulton Insurance Agency d/b/a Florida Insurance Agency, Center Management Corporation, and Laser Fun Zone Corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D17-1453

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2018]

Kevin F. Richardson of Clyatt, Richardson & Ryan, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Michael J. Ferrin, Delray Beach, for appellee, Judith Brancato.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* . *See**Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee* , 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

Warner, Gross and Levine, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


California Association for Research in Astronomy dba W.M. Keck 
Observatory, Notice of Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of 
Scientific Instruments

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. .106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, NW, 
Washington, D.C.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments 
of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described 
below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
Docket Number: 08-061. Applicant: California Association for Research 
in Astronomy dba W.M. Keck Observatory, Kamuela, HI 96743. Instrument: 
Laser Launch Telescope Assembly (LTA). Manufacturer: Galileo Avionica, 
Italy. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 9219, March 3, 2009.
    Reasons: This laser launch telescope assembly (LTA) has stringent 
technical requirements in regard to optical qualities, size, weight, 
and laser power capabilities than standard telescope designs that are 
used for viewing versus projection of a laser beam. Unique features of 
this LTA include: 1)it is able to handle the laser power of 20 watts of 
589 nanometer light and throughput requirements, 2) it has a 
temperature range of -10 degrees C to 10 degrees C, and 3) it is able 
to meet those requirements while the unit is moved from 0 to 70 degrees 
zenith angle.

    Dated: April 7, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-8389 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-S
Hon. Paul H. Brown Fire Insurance Commissioner Board of Insurance Commissioners Austin, Texas opinion No. v-1429.
Re: Legality of the Board of InsuranceCommissioners~ carrying on its payroll at one time more than twenty fulltime employeeswhose salaries are to be paid from an approDear Sir: priation providing for twenty employees, only.
Your request for an opinion relates to the legality of the Board of InsuranceCommissioners* carrying on its payroll at any one time more than twenty full-time raterswhose salaries are to be paid from Item 31 of the appropriations to its Fire Insurance Division contained in the general departmental appropriation bill for the currentbiennium beginning September 1, 1951, and ending August 31 1953. (H.B. 426 Art. III,Acts 52nd Leg., R.S. 1951, oh. 499, p. 1224, at p. 1372.

Item 31, m, contains an appropriationof $64,8oo.00 for each fiscal year of the currentbiennium to pay the salaries of "Raters,20, none to exceed $3,720 per year.”

Subsection (a)of Section 16 ofArticle 111, House Bill 426 (p. 1439) provides:

“(a) A11 annual salaries shall be paid in twelve (12) equalmonthly installments, provided,however, that the head of any Department of State Government, or any Board or Commission of State Government,may use part-time employees to fill any position provided for in this Act at a salarynot to exceedmore than the prorataamount appropriated for suchposition.”Hon. Paul H. Brown, page 2 (V-1429)

It appears from your letter that only fulltime raters are employed for the Fire InsuranceDivision and their monthly salariesrange from $190.00 to $310.oo. Therefore,we are not concernedherewith the number of part-time raterswho may be employed at any one time.

It is our opinion that the Legislaturehas by the provisions of Item 31, in substance, said to the Board: f'The

appropriationof $64,800hereinmade to your Fire InsuranceDivision for each fiscal year of the biennium beginning September 1, 1951, and endingAugust 31, 1953, may be expendedby you for the employment of raters for that Division, but no more than twenty raterswho work full-timemay be employed at one time, none ofwhom shallbe paid from this appropriationmore than $3,720 in any one year, or more than $310 in any onemonth.11

If it had been the legislative intent to permit the Board to carry on its payroll at any one time an indefinitenumber of raters to be paid from Item 31s it would not have limited the number of raters to be employed to 1120"

or to any other specificnumber,

SUMMARY The Board of InsuranceCommissionersmay not carry on its payroll at one time more than twenty full-time raterswhose salaries are to be paid from the appropriationprovided for by "Item 31” of the current appropriation bill (l&B,426 Acts 52nd Leg., R.S. 1951? ch. 499, p. 1228, at p. 1372.). APPROVED: Yours very truly, C, K. Richards PRICE DANIEL Trial & Appellate Division Attorney General Mary K. Wall Reviewing Assistant Charles D. Mathews First Assistant Bruce W. Bryant Assistant BWB:wb -,
STATE of Louisiana v. Darrin Kashy DUHON a/k/a Darrin Duhon

NO. 2017-KO-1278

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

Denied.
EX PARTE Justin Ellis LOTT

1151258 (CR-14-1518)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Andre Heroux, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of Beauceland
Corporation (the "Company"), that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F
for the year ended February 28, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 25, 2005              /s/ Andre Heroux
                                 -----------------------------------
                                 Name:  Andre Heroux
                                 Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 152/9 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 152 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 479 June 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 152

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 479 June 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 152/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
uht-ex1014_8.htm



Exhibit 10.14

 

 

 

 

December 1, 2021

 

Steve Filton 

Executive Vice President & CFO

UHS of Delaware, Inc.

367 South Gulph Road 

King of Prussia, PA 19406 

 

 

Dear Steve:

 

The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust, at today’s meeting, authorized the renewal of the current Advisory Agreement between Universal Health Realty Income Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (“Agreement”) upon the same terms and conditions. 

 

This letter constitutes Universal Health Realty Income Trust’s offer to renew the Agreement, through December 31, 2022, upon the same terms and conditions.  Please acknowledge UHS of Delaware’s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me.  Thank you.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

/s/ Cheryl K. Ramagano

Cheryl K. Ramagano

Vice President and Treasurer

 

Agreed and Accepted:

 

UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.

 

 

By:  /s/ Steve Filton

Steve Filton

Executive Vice President and CFO

 

 

CC:Charles Boyle