alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 1, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-1219

Lower Tribunal No. 13-32311

________________

Roxanna Denis,

Appellant,

vs.

Carl Edouard Denis,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Judith L.

Kreeger, Judge.

Roxanna Denis, in proper person.

Law Office of Pamela M. Gordon, P.A., and Pamela M. Gordon

(Hollywood), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

SCALES, J.
Appellant Roxanna Denis (“Wife”) challenges three portions of a final

judgment dissolving her marriage to appellee Carl Edouard Denis (“Husband”): (i)

the trial court’s denial of Wife’s claim for either bridge-the-gap or rehabilitative

alimony; (ii) the trial court’s denial of Wife’s claim for attorney’s fees; and (iii) the

trial court’s requiring of Wife to pay one-third of the minor child’s uninsured

medical and dental expenses.

We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Wife’s claims for alimony and attorney’s fees, and therefore affirm these

determinations without further discussion.1 With regard to the third issue raised by

Wife, however, we reverse and remand to the trial court either to: (i) require Wife

to pay only 28.48 percent of the minor child’s uninsured medical and dental

expenses, or (ii) specify its rationale for requiring the Wife to pay one-third (i.e.,

33.33 percent) of these expenses. Husband concedes that, based on Husband’s

Child Support Guidelines Worksheet, Wife’s responsibility for these expenses

should be only 28.48 percent rather than the 33.33 percent ordered in the final

judgment.

1 To the extent that Wife’s argument is based upon the trial court’s failure to recite

specific factual findings warranting the denial of Wife’s alimony claim, we note

that Wife filed no motion for rehearing directed toward the final judgment, and the

basis for the trial court’s ruling is supported by the record. Broadfoot v. Broadfoot,

791 So. 2d 584, 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

2
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings

consistent herewith.

3
----- Forwarded by Jaime Pagan/RTP/USEPA/US on 06/16/2008 03:56 PM -----

"Farr, Clint J (DEC)" <clint.farr@alas To ka.gov> Jaime Pagan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 05/22/2008 11:37 cc AM "Farr, Clint J (DEC)" <clint.farr@alaska.gov> Subject Rural Alaska transition to ULSD
cost assessment

Hi guys,

Here is a PDF version of the cost assessment report which was presented to you on Thursday.

Clint(See attached file: Final Report.pdf)
# CE2004065EN.01016801.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/168 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/168

---

(2004/C 65 E/184)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2547/03

by Joan Vallvé (ELDR) to the Council

(31 July 2003)

Subject:   Linguistic coexistence as reflected in Spanish passports

Subject:

The resolution of 10 July 1995 (1) requires all Member States to adjust the format of their passports by replacing the term ‘European Communities’ with ‘European Union’.

1

In connection with this adjustment, a proposal has been tabled in the Spanish Congress of Deputies to recognise the coexistence of official languages in the passports issued to citizens living in an autonomous community where there is more than one official language. The Spanish Government, however, refuses to accept that proposal, citing the resolution of 23 June 1981 (2).

2

Given that Article I-3 of the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe states that ‘The Union shall respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity’ and Article II-22, moreover, stipulates that The Union shall respect cultural, religious and linguistic diversity', thus echoing the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and having regard to the conclusions arising from European Year of Languages, as laid down by decision of Parliament and the Council: will the Council amend the above resolution so as to enable all the official languages of a Member State to be incorporated in that state's passports?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E- 2520/03 and E-2547/03

(17 November 2003)

(17 November 2003)

The Council draws the attention of the Honourable Members to the fact that the Treaty of the European Union does not provide for Community competence in this field.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 4.8.1995, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 241, 19.9.1981, p. 1.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 68 (Friday, April 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 
Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special 
Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice of a decision to designate a class of 
employees at the Hood Building in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as an 
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy 
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On 
March 31, 2009, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of 
employees as an addition to the SEC:

    All employees of the DOE, its predecessor agencies, and their 
contractors and subcontractors who worked in the Hood Building in 
Cambridge, MA, from May 9, 1946 through December 31, 1963, for a 
number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring 
either solely under this employment or in combination with work days 
within the parameters established for one or more other classes of 
employees included in the SEC.

This designation will become effective April 30, 2009, unless Congress 
provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this effective 
date, HHS will publish a notice in the Federal Register reporting the 
addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any provision by 
Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to the SEC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37787476647774737419707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="216e626072616265620f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>.

Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9-8252 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
21.1





SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE COMPANY








The
following are subsidiaries of Siberian Energy Group Inc.:





ZAURALNEFTEGAZ
LIMITED





A company
organized under the laws of England, of which Siberian Energy Group Inc. owns
50% of the issued and outstanding stock.





SIBERIAN
ENERGY GROUP INC.





A
corporation formed under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada, of which
Siberian Energy Group Inc. owns 100% of the issued and outstanding
stock.





KONDANEFTEGAZ,
LLC





A Russian
limited liability company, of which Siberian Energy Group Inc. owns 44% of the
outstanding and issued stock.
---

Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Raakel S. Iskanius, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         
 the annual report on Form 20-F of Great Panther Resources Limited for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)          
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Panther
Resources Limited.

Dated March 31, 2008.

/s/ Raakel S.
IskaniusRaakel S. Iskanius Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harris Ravine, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: April 14, 2004 |  | 
|-------------------- |  | 
|                     |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fischer Imaging Corporation and will be retained by Fischer Imaging Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
September 9, 2009 

Ms. Margaret Gilligan 

Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety 

Aviation Safety 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW. 

Washington, DC 20571 

Dear Ms. Gilligan: 

On behalf of the Flight and Duty Time Limitations and Rest Requirements Aviation 

Rulemaking Committee (ARC), we are pleased to provide you with a copy of the 

ARC's recommendations on updated flight and duty time limitations and rest 

requirements. The recommendations are in the format of a draft notice of proposed 

rulemaking, as required by the ARC's charter. 

These recommendations reflect diligent work by the ARC on an accelerated timeline, and 

represent careful deliberation by the members, combining the best available science and 

their collective experience in the air carrier industry. We are confident that the 

recommendations represent a substantial improvement over current regulations and will be 

effective in helping to achieve the FAA's goal of reducing fatigue and increasing alertness 

among flightcrew members. 

We trust these recommendations will be helpful in your decisionrnaking process. We and 

our fellow ARC members stand ready to assist the FAA in prioritizing implementation of 

the ARC's recommendations. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

Don Wykoff 

Co-Chair
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) In connection with the Annual Report of Empirical Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Derek Ward, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Derek WardDerek WardChief Executive Officer & Principal Accounting OfficerMay 24, 2010 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Eduardo SAUCEDO-MIRANDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Defense General Services Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration 48 CFR Chapter 1
[Docket No. FAR 2018-0001, Sequence No. 1]
 AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
 ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.
 SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of DOD, GSA, and NASA. This 
                            *Small Entity Compliance Guide*
                             has been prepared in accordance with section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. It consists of a summary of the rule appearing in Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-97, which amends the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). An asterisk (*) next to a rule indicates that a regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared. Interested parties may obtain further information regarding this rule by referring to FAC 2005-97, which precedes this document. These documents are also available via the internet at 
                            *http://www.regulations.gov.*
 DATES: January 24, 2018.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cecelia Davis at 202-219-0202 for clarification of content. For information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-97, FAR Case 2018-001. Rule Listed in FAC 2005-97
Subject
FAR case
AnalystTrade Agreements Thresholds
2018-001
Davis.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summary for the FAR rule follows. For the actual revisions and/or amendments made by this FAR case, refer to the specific item number and subject set forth in the document following this item summary. FAC 2005-97 amends the FAR as follows: Trade Agreements Thresholds (FAR Case 2018-001) This final rule amends the Federal Acquisition Regulation to adjust the thresholds for application of the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement and the Free Trade Agreements as determined by the United States Trade Representative, according to predetermined formulae under the agreements. Dated: January 18, 2018. William F. Clark, Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.


[FR Doc. 2018-01200 Filed 1-23-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
D.M.M., the child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1493

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana

Wayne BRIGALIA, Jr.

NO. 2018-KK-0434

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 2018

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2459 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2459

          To suspend temporarily the duty on germanium oxides.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on germanium oxides.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GERMANIUM OXIDES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00        Germanium oxides    Free            No change      No change      On or before     ''.
                          (CAS No. 1310-53-                                                 12/31/2015
                          8 or 215-180-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2825.60.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59627; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2009-02]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate 
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Amex LLC Formally 
Adopting and Codifying Its Wireless Data Communications Initiatives

April 2, 2009.
    Correction: In FR Document No. E9-7291, published on Wednesday, 
April 1, 2009, beginning on page 14834, third column, first paragraph, 
fifth line, the name of the exchange is corrected to read ``NYSE Amex 
LLC''.

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-7973 Filed 4-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Juan Carlos PORTIELES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-668

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 31

                          RULE 13A-14(A) CERTIFICATION
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Judy M. Robinett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Medical Discoveries,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003
                                   /S/  JUDY M. ROBINETT
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Judy M. Robinett
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                   principal financial officer

                                       14
-77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6
38.4 38.6 38.8 39.0 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony REDDICK

NO. 2018-KK-0302

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant.