This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

98 

Vol. 83, No. 1 

Tuesday, January 2, 2018 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–57–2017] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 35— 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 

Authorization of Production Activity; 

Estee Lauder Inc.; (Skin Care, 

Fragrance, and Cosmetic Products); 

Bristol and Trevose, Pennsylvania 

On August 29, 2017, Estee Lauder Inc. 

submitted a notification of proposed 

production activity to the FTZ Board for 

its facility within FTZ 35, in Bristol and 

Trevose, Pennsylvania. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (82 FR 44159, 

September 21, 2017). On December 27, 

2017, the applicant was notified of the 

FTZ Board’s decision that no further 

review of the activity is warranted at 

this time. The production activity 

described in the notification was 

authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the FTZ Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.14. 

Dated: December 27, 2017. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2017–28270 Filed 12–29–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may 

request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) conduct an 

administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by Commerce 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

period of review. We intend to release 

the CBP data under Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) to all parties 

having an APO within five days of 

publication of the initiation notice and 

to make our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 21 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Therefore, we 

encourage all parties interested in 

commenting on respondent selection to 

submit their APO applications on the 

date of publication of the initiation 

notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. 

Commerce invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the review. 

In the event Commerce decides it is 

necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, Commerce finds that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will 

not conduct collapsing analyses at the 

respondent selection phase of a review 

and will not collapse companies at the 

respondent selection phase unless there 

has been a determination to collapse 

certain companies in a previous 

segment of this antidumping proceeding 

(i.e., investigation, administrative 

review, new shipper review or changed 

circumstances review). For any 

company subject to a review, if 

Commerce determined, or continued to 

treat, that company as collapsed with 

others, Commerce will assume that such 

companies continue to operate in the 

same manner and will collapse them for 

respondent selection purposes. 

Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse 

companies for purposes of respondent 

selection. Parties are requested to (a) 

identify which companies subject to 

review previously were collapsed, and 

(b) provide a citation to the proceeding 

in which they were collapsed. Further, 

if companies are requested to complete 

a Quantity and Value Questionnaire for 

purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of a proceeding 

where Commerce considered collapsing 

that entity, complete quantity and value 

data for that collapsed entity must be 

submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that requests a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that Commerce may 

extend this time if it is reasonable to do 

so. In order to provide parties additional 

certainty with respect to when 

Commerce will exercise its discretion to 

extend this 90-day deadline, interested 

parties are advised that, with regard to 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Notices 99 

1Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 

on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day 

when the Department is closed. 

2See also the Enforcement and Compliance 

website at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 

3See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

4 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties 

should specify that they are requesting a review of 

entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to 

the extent possible, include the names of such 

exporters in their request. 

reviews requested on the basis of 

anniversary months on or after January 

2018, Commerce does not intend to 

extend the 90-day deadline unless the 

requestor demonstrates that an 

extraordinary circumstance prevented it 

from submitting a timely withdrawal 

request. Determinations by Commerce to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Commerce is providing this notice on 

its website, as well as in its 

‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative 

Review’’ notices, so that interested 

parties will be aware of the manner in 

which Commerce intends to exercise its 

discretion in the future. 

Opportunity to Request a Review: Not 

later than the last day of January 2018,1

interested parties may request 

administrative review of the following 

orders, findings, or suspended 

investigations, with anniversary dates in 

January for the following periods: 

Period of review 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Brazil: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, A–351–837 ...................................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

India: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, A–533–828 ........................................................................................................ 1/1/17–12/31/17 

Mexico: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, A–201–831 .................................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

Republic of Korea: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, A–580–852 .................................................................................. 1/1/17–12/31/17 

South Africa: Ferrovanadium, A–791–815 .................................................................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

Thailand: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, A–549–820 .................................................................................................. 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Calcium Hypochlorite, A–570–008 ........................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod, A–570–012 .......................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Crepe Paper Products, A–570–895 ......................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Ferrovanadium, A–570- 873 .................................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Folding Gift Boxes, A–570- 866 ............................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Potassium Permanganate, A–570–863 ................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Wooden Bedroom Furniture, A–570–890 ................................................................................ 1/1/17–12/31/17 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

The People’s Republic of China: Calcium Hypochlorite, C–570–009 ........................................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod, C–570–013 .......................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods, C–570–944 ..................................................................... 1/1/17–12/31/17 

The People’s Republic of China: Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe, C–570–936 ................................................ 1/1/17–12/31/17 

Suspension Agreements 

Russia: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel, A–821–808 ............................................................................................................ 1/1/17–12/31/17 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), an interested party as 

defined by section 771(9) of the Act may 

request in writing that the Secretary 

conduct an administrative review. For 

both antidumping and countervailing 

duty reviews, the interested party must 

specify the individual producers or 

exporters covered by an antidumping 

finding or an antidumping or 

countervailing duty order or suspension 

agreement for which it is requesting a 

review. In addition, a domestic 

interested party or an interested party 

described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 

must state why it desires the Secretary 

to review those particular producers or 

exporters. If the interested party intends 

for the Secretary to review sales of 

merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which was produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order-by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Note that, for any party Commerce 

was unable to locate in prior segments, 

Commerce will not accept a request for 

an administrative review of that party 

absent new information as to the party’s 

location. Moreover, if the interested 

party who files a request for review is 

unable to locate the producer or 

exporter for which it requested the 

review, the interested party must 

provide an explanation of the attempts 

it made to locate the producer or 

exporter at the same time it files its 

request for review, in order for the 

Secretary to determine if the interested 

party’s attempts were reasonable, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011), Commerce clarified 

its practice with respect to the 

collection of final antidumping duties 

on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders.2

Commerce no longer considers the 

non-market economy (NME) entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to an 

antidumping duty administrative 

reviews.3 Accordingly, the NME entity 

will not be under review unless 

Commerce specifically receives a 

request for, or self-initiates, a review of 

the NME entity.4 In administrative 

reviews of antidumping duty orders on 

merchandise from NME countries where 

a review of the NME entity has not been 

initiated, but where an individual 

exporter for which a review was 

initiated does not qualify for a separate 

rate, Commerce will issue a final 

decision indicating that the company in 

question is part of the NME entity. 

However, in that situation, because no 

review of the NME entity was 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
100 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Notices 

5See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

conducted, the NME entity’s entries 

were not subject to the review and the 

rate for the NME entity is not subject to 

change as a result of that review 

(although the rate for the individual 

exporter may change as a function of the 

finding that the exporter is part of the 

NME entity). Following initiation of an 

antidumping administrative review 

when there is no review requested of the 

NME entity, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters 

not named in the initiation notice, 

including those that were suspended at 

the NME entity rate. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on 

Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS 

website at http://access.trade.gov.5

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request 

must be served on the petitioner and 

each exporter or producer specified in 

the request. 

Commerce will publish in the Federal 

Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation of 

Administrative Review of Antidumping 

or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, 

or Suspended Investigation’’ for 

requests received by the last day of 

January 2018. If Commerce does not 

receive, by the last day of January 2018, 

a request for review of entries covered 

by an order, finding, or suspended 

investigation listed in this notice and for 

the period identified above, Commerce 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

or countervailing duties on those entries 

at a rate equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: December 22, 2017. 

James Maeder, 

Senior Director, performing the duties of 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2017–28260 Filed 12–29–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) is 

automatically initiating the five-year 

reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

(AD/CVD) order(s) listed below. The 

International Trade Commission (the 

Commission) is publishing concurrently 

with this notice its notice of Institution 

of Five-Year Reviews which covers the 

same order(s). 

DATES: Applicable (January 1, 2018). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Commerce official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230. For 

information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) 

and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). 

Guidance on methodological or 

analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s 

conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth 

in Antidumping Proceedings: 

Calculation of the Weighted-Average 

Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate 

in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 

8101 (February 14, 2012). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with section 751(c) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are 

initiating Sunset Reviews of the 

following antidumping and 

countervailing duty order(s): 

DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Department contact 

A–570–981 .... 731–TA–1195 China ......................... Utility Scale Wind Towers (1st Review) ... Robert James, (202) 482–0649. 

C–570–982 .... 701–TA–486 .. China ......................... Utility Scale Wind Towers (1st Review) ... Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312.

A–588–838 .... 731–TA–739 .. Japan ......................... Clad Steel Plate (4th Review) .................. Robert James, (202) 482–0649. 

A–201–842 .... 731–TA–1200 Mexico ....................... Large Residential Washers (1st Review) Robert James, (202) 482–0649. 

A–580–868 .... 731–TA–1199 Republic of Korea ..... Large Residential Washers (1st Review) Robert James, (202) 482–0649. 

C–580–869 .... 701–TA–488 .. Republic of Korea ...... Large Residential Washers (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. 

A–552–812 .... 731–TA–1198 Vietnam ..................... Utility Scale Wind Towers (1st Review) ... Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statute and Commerces’s 

regulations, Commerce’s schedule for 

Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on Commerce’s website at the 

following address: http://

enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with 

Commerce’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, and service of 

documents. These rules, including 

electronic filing requirements via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES