OFFICE OFTHLATTORNMQRNERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN . . 
.3 t 

a 3. h..’ 

latter schi~ols Lsve not been an2rovsd or 

accrsdltsd by th5.s Eosrd either OS to quslificrtions of stuCent nurses or as to o(j;Llrses 

0r tit;itiy by Dtudants or any other mstter? 

'3. %b'ould tkia Boord be autborlzed to 

issue s si~CFa1 llcanse t0 ~;~pliOf.UltS iOr 

nursi:y in tub~rciilar on~ee~o~ly, where tho 

q&.lciinta hsve ritte3ded anurskg soLoo 

oonneoted with a hoapltal ~aoeptiag aa patierit8 only thooe rirtllated uith tub6reulosl8 u&ther'thea.urdgaohoel~coo* 

1t&6.8psalalnur9~Mhoeloroot, 

u&k tha applSauit8 ham not attended for 

Qa.0 oaatllluous yB@w ml MaredIted Lture 
L - 

Hon. OrTIll s. krpbutor, Fa6b 3 

Comds8ion the power to make any rule0 and ra&u.latIona with 

referenae to 80a8ona1w0rkemf, tho bMetlt8 for suoh worker8 

or the oontrlbutlons o? their amployezn. 

The oaptlon of Sanata Bill Ho. 21 dobo not In any 

rtate that a nw Seot:on, tc-wit! Seatlon 8-A Is being 

to tha bill or tha original Aat; It does, howover, 

speaIfIaally note that two new aeatlons. Seotlon 19-A and 

Seotlan 19-B are being added. 

-e aall your attention to 39 Tex. Sur. p. 104 in 

whloh we ilnd the follmIng statement: 

"And where a title names aa the p&poee of.tho 

Aot the amendmant of spealfled motion of a former 

bill, the body o? the sot, after amndlng suah 8botlon, may not prcmeml to ret out other 8eotlons whlah 

would beaome a part of the origIna aat but Omlah are 

not Inoludad In the title by reason of be- ohangos 

in, Or Ql8Z~Qt.S Of, the 8sOtiOII 8peOifibd thQ'dJL" 

Thle other rtetement is found in 39 Tar. Jur. p. 104: 

“The title upre8sIng a pUl’906b to amand a 8-t 

uta In a oortafn particular la dsaeptlve aud mirhaAlng ln8ofar a8 the Iply of the aat purport8 to aawl 

a prior law in other partIoular8.a 

In 8bMte Bill HO. 21 (SbOtiOn 8-A. $Ub8bOtiOL! (3). 

Artlals 522lb) the Lagirlaturb hu orbatbd antl addbd a IMU 

fUWtbA for tflb &1mi~81m~8, pbXMittbI6 thbm to do O- 

-With rOf8r@ElOb t0 8bMOIlb.l UOrk@F8 8lldthbir UglgbZY8, 

a par not haretotore dolbgated to the Comd88ioa. Ho Mntlon I8 Mda in the uptlon of tha Bill putting thb mmbbn 

of the LOgiE~tUl?b of the pub110 upOn IlotiOb that till& IIW 

mtter wa8 belaa sti by the Laglslatura as an ambndm~t to 

the already exlrt tbmrploymnt Catxpen8ation Aat. ‘Phb aaptlon la misleading and does not inrona the 8euubb?8 of thb 

LegIelature of the subjeot matter upon whlah thay are mting. 

Thb 8pnoffloation oi the nature of the prOpO8ed 

aaendmat In our opinion rlxes the oharaoter of the amndmcat 

as on8 sseklng no other alteratloli In the OrIgInal l rtlole than 

to do the thin@ named. They speaItlaally aat out that new 

Seotlons 19-r\ and 19-3 nere being added. The listing o? thb 

Seotlons of ArtIole 5221-b to be aaended, tha 8pbOifiOIlthIl 
Hon. Crvllle S. Carpenter, Pagb 4 

of the nature of the proposbd amndaont8 and the info~atlon 

that new Saotions 19-A aud 19-9 wbra baIng added was a dIstlnot aismranoe that the objeot or the act wa8 a llmlted one. 

The announasment having been made by the Legislature, In the 

caption, that Artlole 5221-b kltle to be mended In oertain 

Fmtlauleirs, no different or nw embndments oan be added, 800 

'Zard Cattle and Tasturs Company YE. Carpenter, 200 S. 'fi. 521, 

and Aruold vs. Leonard, 273 S. 7:. 800. To pernit ruoh a prooedure Is, In our oplnlon, a violation of krtlale 3, Seotlon 

35 ot the Constitution of Texar,. 

It la our opinion that the aaptlon of Senate Bill 

Ho. 21 Is not broad enough to aoter the new matter lnaluded 

in Seotlon 8-n, Submotion (3), a8 provlded In the amendmmxt 

to Ax-8101~ 5221-b. Ia riew of our 8nwbr to your tint que8- 

tlon, wo do not believe it nbobs8ax-y to awsrer your rrooond 

qaeatIolL 

ccc