Compliance Test Program 

Alcoa lntalco Works 

Ferndale, Washington 

Source: 187 Bake Oven Baghouse (BO) 

Air Operating Permit No. 000295-0 

Report Number: NW11ALINT109 

Dates Tested: June 29 - 30, 2011 Date Prepared: September 9, 2011 

PREPARED FOR 

Ms. Kathryn Mitchell 

Alcoa lntalco Works 

4050 Mountainview Road 

Ferndale, W A 98248 

Phone 360.384.7206 
Compliance Test Program 

Alcoa lntalco Works 

Ferndale, Washington 

Source: 187 Bake Oven Baghouse (80) 

This report is supported by 

GOLDEN's Quality Assurance 

Manual and ASTM 07036 Interim 

Accreditation as an Air Emission 

Testing Body. The information 

included in the report is authentic 

and accurate to the best of our 

knowledge. 

tan B. Moye, Ql (Groups 1-111} 

Project Supervisor I Onsite Ql 
USEPA REFERENCE METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 3 

USEPA METHOD 1: SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR STATIONARY SOURCES ............................................... 3 

USEPA METHOD 2: DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE (TYPES PITOT TUBE) 3 

USEPA METHODS 3: MOLECULAR WEIGHT (INTEGRATED BAG) ............................................................................... 3 

USEPA METHOD 4: DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT IN STACK GASES ....................................................... 3 

USEPA METHOD 5: DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES .............................. 4 

TESTING EQUIPMENT .............................................................................................................................................. 4 

PREPARATION OF SAMPLE TRAIN COLLECTION ........................................................................................................ .4 

SAMPLE TRAIN OPERATION ..................................................................................................................................... 5 

SAMPLE RECOVERY ......................................................................................... ························· .............................. 5 

FIGURE 1-1. US EPA METHOD 5 SAMPLING TRAIN ..................................................................................................... 7 

METHOD 315: FILTERABLE PARTICULATE MATTER AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE EXTRACTABLE MATTER (MCEM) ....... 8 

FIGURE 1-2. USEPA METHOD 315 SAMPLING TRAIN ........................................................................................... .... 9 

ALCOA METHOD 4075A- TF: PARTICULATE, GASEOUS AND TOTAL FLUORIDE .......................................................... 9 

FIGURE 1-3. ALCOA METHOD 4075A-TF SAMPLING TRAIN ..................................................................................... 1 0 

SOURCE INFORMATION ........ ...................................................... ............................................................................... 11 

FIGURE 1-4. DIAGRAM OF TESTING LOCATION FOR THE BAKE OVEN BAGHOUSE ...................................................... 11 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS ...... ... .. ................................................. ............................................................................... 12 

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE (P5) ............................ ..................................................................................... 12 

GAS VOLUME SAMPLED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS (VM(sTo)) ................................................................................... 12 

WATER VAPOR COLLECTED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS (Vw(sm)) ............................................................................ 12 

MEASURED STACK GAS MOISTURE CONTENT (8w5) ............................................................................................... 13 

WET MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS ............................................................................................................. 13 

STACK GAS VELOCITY .......................................................................................................................................... 13 

VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE (ACTUAL CUBIC FEET PER MIN) ....................................................................................... 13 

VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE (STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS) ............................................................................. 14 

PARTICULATE MATTER SAMPLE AND EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS ...................................................................... 14 

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE .................................................................................................................................. 14 

STACK GAS PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION (GRAINS PER DSCF) ............................................................................ 14 

STACK GAS PARTICULATE EMISSION RATE (LB/HR) ................................................................................................ 15 

TOTAL METHYLENE CHLORIDE EXTRACTABLE MATTER (GRAMS) ............................................................................. 15 

TOTAL FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION (MG/DSCM} ...................................................................................................... 15 

EMISSION RATE (LB/TON) ...................................................................................................................................... 16 

TEST RESULTS ... ..................................................................................................... .... ... .... ..................................... 17 

TABLE 1-2. METHOD 5 AND METHOD 315 TEST RESULTS ...................................................................................... 17 

TABLE 1-3. ALCOA METHOD 4075A-TF TEST RESULTS ......................................................................................... 18 

APPENDIX A- TESTING EQUIPMENT ....................................................................................................................... A 

TABLE 1-4. TESTING EQUIPMENT USED IN THE COMPLIANCE TESTING ..................................................................... A 

APPENDIX B- RESUMES ........................................................................................................................................ B 

APPENDIX c- CALIBRATION DATA .......................................................................................................................... c 

APPENDIX D- FIELD DATA ..................................................................................................................................... D 

APPENDIX E- REFERENCE METHOD DATA ............................................................................................................. E 

APPENDIX F- PROCESS DATA ............................................................................................................................... F 

APPENDIX G- LABORATORY DATA ......................................................................................................................... G 
Methodologies as well as all requirements outlined in Alcoa lntalco's Air Operating permit No. 000295-0. 

For the compliance test program, three (3) 5-hour test runs were performed by experienced test personnel 

in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Code of Federal 

Regulations, Title 40, Part 60 (40CFR60), Appendix A Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, 40CFR63 Method 315 and 

Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA) Source Sampling Method 4075A-TF. The methods are 

discussed in the Performance Test Procedures section of this report. Included in this test report are 

sections detailing the Test Program, including Executive Summary, Introduction, Sampling Procedures, 

Source Information, Sample calculation and Test Results Sections; with Appendices which include all 

resumes of key personnel, calibrations, field data, calculated data, and process data. 

Table 1-1 presents the compliance results of the test program performed on the Bake Oven Baghouse. 

Emission Source Methods Three Run Compliance 

Unit No. Name Perfonned Test Date(s) Analyte, Units Average Limit 

FPM, gr/dscf 0.0002 

FPM, lb/hr 0.16 

Bake Oven US EPA Methods 1, 6/26. MCEM, gr/dscf 0.00025 187 Baghouse 2, 3, 4, 5, 315 & 6/30/2011 Alcoa 4075A· TF MCEM, lb/ton *0.015 0.18 

Total Fluoride, ppm 0.256 

Total Fluoride, lb/ton *0.0055 0.20 

• Lbl!on of Green Anode placed in the Anode Bake Furnace. 

Table 1·1. Summary of Results 

11Page 
p

p

p

g

p

filterable particulate matter (FPM), Total Fluoride, and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter (MCEM) from 

the exhaust of the Bake Oven Baghouse. Mr. Stan Moye served as Project Supervisor, and performed the 

testing with the assistance of Messrs. Paul Clark, Pete Hilty and Daniel Farwell. Ms. Patricia Bilskis was 

the point of contact for Alcoa lntalco Works during the testing. All documents and data relating to this test 

program are presented in this report. 

Airflow was determined using USEPA Methods 1 and 2. Testing for 0 2 and C02 was performed using 

USEPA Method 3. The moisture content of the stack gas was measured using Method 4, which was 

performed inclusively with Method 315 and Alcoa Method 4075A-TF for the Bake Oven Baghouse. Testing 

procedures are discussed in more detail in the test methods section. All calculated reference method data 

is provided in Appendix E, and examples of all calculations are presented in the Sample Calculation section 

of this report. Process Data is provided in Appendix F of this report. 

Problems, Deviations and/or Exceptions 

No problems encountered during this test program. 

21 Page 
test (40 CFR 60, Appendix A). A schematics of the various sampling systems used to perform the test 

program on the different sources can be found in Figures 1-1 through 1-4. Specifics for the test equipment 

utilized in this program are presented in Appendix A. 

USEPA Method 1: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources 

Sampling traverse points were determined based on the ratio of the stack diameter to the 

upstream and downstream distances of the sampling plane to the closest disturbances. 

The minimum number of traverse points on the sampling plane is determined from Figure 

1-2 and Table 1-2 of 40CFR60, Appendix A, Method 1. 

USEPA Method 2: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow 

Rate (TypeS Pitot Tube) 

Velocity and volumetric flow rates were determined from the measurement of the stack 

gas velocity head with a Type-S Pitot tube and inclined manometer. The Pitot tube was 

constructed per USEPA Method 2 design specifications. Based on the face opening 

alignments, external tubing diameter, and base-to-opening plane distances, a coefficient 

value of 0.84 was assigned to the Pitot tube. 

USEPA Methods 3: Molecular Weight (Integrated Bag) 

USEPA Method 3 was performed to determine the molecular weight of the gas based on 

measurements of the concentration of oxygen (02) and carbon dioxide (C02) in the stack 

gas. Method 3A analyzers were used in lieu of the Orsat analyzer. 02 was measured 

using a paramagnetic analyzer. C02 was measured using a non-dispersive infrared 

(NDIR) analyzer. During each test run an integrated bag of the sampled gas stream was 

collected. Method 3 was performed at any site that gaseous emissions testing using 

direct interface sampling was not being performed. The samples were analyzed onsite 

the same day. Molecular weight data was collected during all emission test periods. 

USEPA Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases 

USEPA Method 4 was performed inclusively with Methods 5, 315 and 4075A-TF to 

measure the moisture content of the stack gas for calculating the volumetric flow rate 

and molecular weight on a dry basis. The impingers for each high-flow sample train 

were weighed before and after each run to determine moisture weight gain. 

3IPage 
the outside to preserve a constant internal diameter. A range of nozzle sizes 

suitable for isokinetic sampling from 1/8 to 1/2 inch was available the day of 

testing, and each nozzle was calibrated. The probe liner was made of stainless 

steel tubing with a heating system capable of maintaining a gas temperature at 

the exit end during sampling of 120±14°C (248 ± 25°F). 

A Type S pitot tube was attached to the probe (as shown in Figure 1-1) to allow 

constant monitoring of the stack gas velocity. The impact (high pressure) 

opening plane of the pitot tube was even with or above the nozzle entry plane 

during sampling. The Type S pitot tube assembly has a correction coefficient, 

typically 0.84 when physical criteria are met. A dual inclined/vertical oil-guage 

manometer was used for velocity head and orifice differential pressure 

readings A borosilicate glass filter holder, with a glass frit filter support 

and a Teflon® coated gasket was used. The holder design has a positive 

pressure seal against leakage from the outside or around the filter. The holder 

is attached with connecting glassware to the outlet of the probe. 

The filter heating system utilized for this test was capable of maintaining a 

temperature around the filter holder during the sampling of 120±14 oc 

(248±25°F). A temperature gauge capable of measuring temperature to within 

3°C (5.4°F) is installed so that the temperature around the filter holder can be 

regulated and monitored during sampling. 

The impinger train used to remove moisture from the gas sample consisted of 

four impingers connected in series with leak-free ground glass fittings or any 

similar leak-free non-contaminating fittings. The first, third and fourth impingers 

were of the Greenburg-Smith design that have been modified by replacing the 

tip with a 1.3 em (1/2 in.) ID glass tube extending to about 1.3 em (1/2 in.) from 

the bottom of the flask. The second impinger was of the Greenburg-Smith 

design with the standard tip. A thermometer, capable of measuring 

temperature to within 1 oc (2°F) was placed at the outlet of the fourth impinger 

for exit temperature monitoring purposes. 

The metering system was made up of the following: vacuum gauge, leak-free 

pump, thermometers capable of measuring temperature to within 3°C (5.4°F), 

dry gas meter (DGM) capable of measuring volume to within 2 %, and related 

equipment, as shown in Figure 1-2. 

Preparation of Sample Train Collection 

During preparation and assembly of the sampling train, all openings where 

contamination can occur were kept covered until just prior to assembly or until 

sampling was about to begin. 100 ml of distilled, deionized water was placed 

in the first two impingers, the third impinger was left empty, and silica gel, preweighed to the nearest 0.5 g was placed in the fourth impinger. Using tweezers 

or clean disposable surgical gloves, a labeled (identified) and weighed filter was 

placed in the filter holder. The probe was marked to denote the sample point 

41 P age 
probe. During the sampling run, an isokinetic sampling rate was maintained, 

and a temperature of 248 ± 25°F was maintained around the filter. For each 

run, pertinent data was recorded on the appropriate data sheet. The stack 

cross-section was traversed, as required by Method 5, being careful not to 

bump the probe nozzle into the stack walls when sampling near the walls, 

which minimizes the chance of extracting deposited material. 

During the test run, periodic adjustments were made to maintain an isokinetic 

sampling rate, and additional ice was added to the impinger train in order to 

maintain an impinger outlet temperature of 68°F or lower. Also, periodic checks 

of the manometer were made to insure it was level and zeroed. 

At the end of the sample run, the coarse adjust valve was closed, the probe and 

nozzle were removed from the stack, the pump was turned off, the final DGM 

meter reading was recorded, and a post-test leak-check was conducted. Also, 

the pitot lines were leak-checked. The lines must pass this leak-check in order 

to validate the velocity head data. Finally, the percent isokinetic was calculated 

to determine whether the run was valid or another test run should be 

performed. 

Sample Recovery 

Sample collection procedures began as soon as the probe was removed from 

the stack at the end of the sampling period. The probe was allowed to cool so it 

could be safely handled, all external PM near the tip of the probe nozzle was 

wiped off, and a cap was placed over it to prevent losing or gaining PM. The 

probe was removed from the sample train, any silicone grease was wiped 

clean, and the open outlet of the probe was capped. Care was taken not to lose 

any condensate that might be present. The umbilical cord was removed from 

the last impinger, and the impinger was closed off with Teflon® tape. The 

selected cleanup area was clean and protected from the wind so that the 

chances of contaminating or losing the sample was minimized. A 200 mL 

portion of the acetone used for cleanup was directly taken from the wash bottle 

being used and placed in a glass sample container labeled "acetone blank. • 

5I Page 
Container No. 2. The recovered PM or any condensate from the probe 

nozzle, probe fitting, probe liner, and front half of the filter holder was collected 

by washing the inner surfaces of these components with acetone and placing 

the wash in a sample container. The probe liner was rinsed and brushed a 

minimum of six times as required for stainless steel probes. This container 

was properly labeled, sealed with Teflon® tape, and the sample level was 

marked with a permanent marker prior to transport to the lab. 

lmpinqers 1, 2, and 3 Using a graduated cylinder, the liquid contained in the 

impingers was measures to the nearest 1 ml and the volume recorded on the 

field data sheet. All liquid contained was then discarded since no back half 

analysis was required for this test program. Using a top loading balance, each 

of the impingers was weighed to within 0.5 g and the weight recorded on the 

field data sheet. This data was used in the stack gas moisture calculation. 

Silica Gel. The color of the indicating silica gel was noted to determine 

whether it had been completely spent, and a notation of its condition was 

made. Using a top loading balance, the impinger was weighed to within 0.5 g 

and the weight was recorded on the field data sheet. 

Reagents: The reagents used in sampling are as follows: (1) Glass fiber filters, without 

organic binder, exhibiting at least 99.95 percent efficiency (<0.05 percent penetration) on 0.3-

micron dioctyl phthalate smoke particles. The filter efficiency test is conducted in accordance 

with ASTM Method D 2986-71. (2) Silica Gel, Indicating type, 6- to 16-mesh. If it has been 

previously used, it is dried at 175°C (350°F) for 2 hours. Since analysis of the material caught 

in the impingers is required, (3) deionized distilled water was used. Analysis of deionized 

water is run prior to field use to eliminate a high blank on test samples. 

61 Page 
PitOtTUb8 

IMPINGER TRAIN 

SENSOR 

Noz!!.!,_ 

HEATED / 

THERMOMETER i 

AREA 

_j>-----1-, 

1 

_______ 

- - - -

OIL MANOMETER 

ORIFICE 

MANOMETER 

\----111"--

Figure 1-1. USEPA Method 5 Sampling Train 

71Page 
followed by an impinger train. The glass filter assembly was enclosed in a temperaturecontrolled heated sample box. The average box temperature is maintained at 248°F ± 

25°F. The nozzle, probe liner, pre-filter connective glassware, and filter are referred to 

as the "front-half" of the sample train. Following the filter was a condenser section, 

which, by convention, is referred to as the "back-half." The condenser section consisted 

of a modified Greenburg-Smith bubbler containing 100 milliliters (mL) of deionized water, 

a second impinger containing 100 mL of deionized water, an empty bubbler, and a 

bubbler containing indicating silica gel desiccant. The back-half was maintained at a 

temperature below 68°F by adding ice to the condenser section during sampling. After 

sampling, the filters were recovered, desiccated, and weighed to constant weight. The 

same weighing procedures were followed to obtain the tare weights for the filters after a 

sixteen-hour extraction in methylene chloride (CH2Cb) and drying. The nozzle and probe 

liner were recovered with acetone as sample portion "2," for the gravimetric 

determination, then they were given a final rinse with CH2Cb and the rinsate was 

quantitatively transferred to a separate glass storage container labeled, "2M." The 

acetone rinse was evaporated and weighed to constant weight (same protocol as the 

filters). The impingers were recovered with deionized (DI) water into one container, 

labeled "3W, and then they were rinsed with 25 mL of acetone into another container. 

They were rinsed again with three 25 mL portions of CH2CI2 into the container with the 

acetone rinse. The back-half aqueous samples were then extracted with 50 mL of 

CH2CI2 that had been used to rinse the sample bottle. The CH2CI2 portion was drained 

into a beaker. The extraction was repeated twice more with 50 mL portions of CH2CI2. 

The aqueous portion was archived. The CH

2CI2 sample, called "3X," was evaporated 

almost to dryness and transferred to a tared aluminum dish and was then dried and 

weighed. The combined acetone/CH

2CI2 rinse, sample portion "3S," was evaporated 

almost to dryness, transferred to a tared aluminum dish, dried, and weighed. This 

analysis was the methylene chloride extractable matter (MCEM) portion of the back-half. 

A gravimetric particulate matter analysis was not performed on the back-half. After 

gravimetric analysis was complete, the front-half sample portions (including filters and 

probe rinse residues) were analyzed for MCEM. The filter was placed in a beaker to 

which 100 mL CH2Cb was added. The beaker was sonicated for three minutes and was 

allowed to stand for twenty minutes. The solution was filtered, then transferred to a 

BOchner funnel and vacuum-filtered into a beaker. The beaker was placed in a 

temperature-controlled oven at less than 40°C and evaporated almost to dryness. The 

contents were transferred to a tared aluminum dish, evaporated to dryness, and 

weighed. 25 mL of CH2CI2 was added to the acetone beaker residue. The beaker was 

sonicated for three minutes and was allowed to stand for twenty minutes. The solution 

was combined with the CH2CI2 probe rinse and the combined sample was filtered then 

transferred to a BOchner funnel and vacuum-filtered into a beaker. The beaker was 

placed in a temperature-controlled oven at less than 40°C and evaporated almost to 

dryness. The contents were transferred to a tared aluminum dish, evaporated to 

dryness, and weighed. The filter residue, front-half rinse residue, the back-half extract 

residue, and the back-half solvent rinse residue represent the total MCEM for the 

sample. 

BI Page 
Oil MANOMETER 

ORIFICE 

t.IANOt.IETER 

VACUUt.l 

PUt.IP 

Figure 1-2. USEPA Method 315 Sampling Train 

Alcoa Method 4075A- TF: Particulate, Gaseous and Total Fluoride 

Alcoa Method 4075A - TF was performed to measure the fluoride content of the stack 

gas. Use of this method requires that the analyses be performed per Alcoa 

4076TF/914F, which was devised especially for this sampling method. The sample train 

consisted of a stainless steel nozzle mounted on a 47mm in-stack stainless steel filter 

holder containing a 47mm Teflon® filter. The filter holder was connected to a series of 

four impingers by means of a stainless steel probe. The first two impingers contained 

125 ml of a 0.1 N sodium hydroxide (NaOH), the third is empty, and the fourth indicating 

silica gel desiccant. 

Following sample collection and the post test leak check, the filter was transferred to 

petri dishes labeled with the sample date, client name, and run number. The contents of 

the nozzle and filter holder inlet section were quantitatively transferred to a storage 

container. Several rinses of acetone were used for the front-half clean-up. After the 

9IPa ge 
were quantitatively transferred to a graduated cylinder using 0.1 N NaOH and 01 water. 

The solution was transferred to a separate labeled sample container for fluoride analysis. 

Sample blanks of the filter and reagents were prepared and analyzed along with the 

samples. 

Stack WaU 

In-Stack Finer 

Holder 

lncUned 

Manometer 

·s· Type 

Pilot Tube 

125 mL 

O.INNaOH Empty 

Temperature 

Sensor 

Silica Gel 

Figure 1-3. Alcoa Method 4075A-TF Sampling Train 

Vacuum 

Gauge 

10 I Page 
A diagram of the Bake Oven Baghouse is shown below in Figure 1-4. 

TRAVERSE POINTS: 16 

NUMBER OF PORTS: 2 

POINTS/PORT: 8 

STACK ID: 84.0 ln. 

PORT LENGTH: 6.0 ln. 

TRAVERSE 

POINT NO. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

DISTANCE FROM 

INSIDE WAll, ln. 

2.7 

8.8 

16.3 

27.1 

58.9 

67.7 

75.2 

81 .3 

Baghou• 

Figure 1-4. Diagram of Testing location for the Bake Oven Baghouse 

11I Page 
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) 

p = P. + psratic 

s bar l3.6 

Where: Pba, = Barometric pressure (in. Hg) 

Psratic =Static pressure of stack gas (in. H20) 

Gas Volume Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmtstd)) 

Where: 

V.n(srd) = (~)xVmx 

29.92 Y[~ar +(~)] Tm 

Vm =Actual gas volume sampled (ff) 

Y = Gas meter calibration factor 

Pba, = Measured barometric pressure (in. Hg) 

!JH =Average differential pressure (in H20) 

Tm =Absolute average meter temperature COR) 

Water Vapor Collected at Standard Conditions (Vw(std)) 

Vw(std) = 0.04715 X ~c Where: 

V,c = Liquid collected in impingers (g) 

121 Page 
( V +V ) w(std) m(std) 

Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas 

Stack Gas Velocity 

Where: 

v, = (85.49 )(c p XavgW) ( i ) P. M, 

Cp = Pitot coefficient (0.84) 

Ts =Average stack temperature ( 0R) 

P5 =Absolute stack gas pressure (in. Hg) 

Ms = Molecular weight of stack gas (lbllb-mole) 

Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual cubic feet per min) 

Where: Oaw = Volumetric flow rate (acfm) 

V8 =Stack gas velocity (ftlsec) 

As= Stack area (tf) 

131 Page 
Where: Qsd =Volumetric flow rate (dscfm) 

Ps =Absolute stack gas pressure (in. Hg) 

T5 =Average stack temperature ( 0R) 

Bws = Stack moisture content 

Particulate Matter Sample and Emission Rate Calculations 

lsokinetic Sampling Rate 

Where: 

I= ( 0.0945xT. xVm(srdJ J ~X v, X An x() x(l- Bws) 

T5 =Stack temperature ("R) 

Vm{stdJ =Sample volume (dscf) 

Ps =Absolute stack gas pressure (in. Hg) 

Vs = Stack gas velocity (fps) 

An= Area of nozzle opening face (tr) 

8 = Run time (minutes) 

Bws = Stack gas moisture content 

Stack Gas Particulate Concentration (grains per dscf) 

Where: 

Cs =0.01543 X~ vm(srd) 

Cs = Particulate concentration (gr/dscf) 

mn =Total particulate collected in sample (mg) 

Vm{stdJ =Sample volume at standard conditions (dscf) 

141 Page 
Where: 

P mr = Particulate emission rate (lblhr) 

Cs = Particulate concentration (grldscf) 

Ostd = Stack gas flow rate (dscfm) 

60= minlhr 

Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter (grams) 

mmcem =I m,o,al - wa - w,- tb 

mmoem =Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter (grams) 

'l_miDial =Sum of the CH:!JI2 from each container (grams) 

W8 = Weight of residue in acetone blank (grams) 

w1 = Weight of residue in methylene chloride blank (grams) 

fb = Weight of filter blank (grams) 

Total Fluoride Concentration (mg/dscm) 

c if = c fp + c fg 

Ctt = Total Fluoride concentration (mg!dscm) 

= Total Particulate Fluoride concentration (mg!dscm) 

= Total Gaseous Fluoride concentration (mg!dscm) 

15I Page 
Where: 

Eb = Emission Rate of TF (lblton) of green anode produced 

Cs = Concentration of TF (mg/dscf) 

Osc1 = Volumetric Flow rate (dscfh) 

K = Conversion Factor (453,600 mgllb) 

161 Page 
provided in the following Appendices. 

l Plant 1 AlCoa ntalco Works I Address Ferndale, W1< Job I NW11AUNT109 I 

I Location 1 Balle oven Bll!lhDuse IPersonne 1Da18 6129. &'3012011 

Run Number I , 2 3 I Avoraao Com lilian .. 

Date Test Date 612912011 6129/11-6130111 &'3012011 

Start Run Start Time 15:36:00 21:59:00 4:15:00 

Run Finish nme 20:55:00 3:23:00 9:29:00 

Net Traversing Points 16 16 16 

9 Net Run Tome, min. 300 300 300 300 

DN Nozzle Diameter. in. 0.188 0.188 0.188 0.188 

c, P~ot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.007 1.007 1.007 1.007 

Par Barometric Pressure, ln. Hg 29.70 29.80 29.75 29.75 

411 Average orifiCe meter Differenbal, on. H,O 1.19 1.27 1.43 1.29 

v,. Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, tr 195.346 196.587 202.568 194.834 

t, Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, F 74.5 68.9 64.6 69.3 

v_d Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 183.555 197.448 204.864 195.289 V~e Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 202.8 259.6 257.7 240.0 

Ywatcl Volume of Water Vapor, scf 9.56 12.24 12.15 11.32 

%H20 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 4.95 5.84 5.60 5.46 

%C02 Carbon Dioxide, % 1.50 1.60 1.20 1.50 

%02 Oxygen,% 18.50 18.00 19.10 18.53 

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lbllb-Mole 28.98 29.01 28.96 28.98 

M, Wet Molecular weight. lbiJb..Mole 28.44 28.37 28.34 28.38 

P, Aue Gas Static Pressure, in. H,O .0.16 .0.16 .0.20 .0.17 

P, Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, on. Hg 29.69 29.79 29.74 29.74 

t. Average Stack Gas Temperature, F 217.3 215.6 211.9 214.9 

1/I!.P, •• Average Square-Root Velocity Head, in H20 1.145 1.190 1.273 1.203 

v, Average Stack Gas Velocity, fVsec 73.64 76.43 81.65 77.24 

A. Stack Crossectional Alea, If 38.48 38.48 38.48 38.48 

Qod Dry Volumetric Aow Rate, dry sclm 125,030 129,304 139,005 131,113 

a_ Actual Wet Volumetric Aue Gas Flow Rate, aclm 170,044 176,474 188,537 178,352 

%I Percent lsoktnetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.7 101.6 98.1 99.1 90. 110 

pb Quantity of green anode material placed in fumace, tons/In 18.02 18.02 18.02 18.02 

w, Filterable Particulate Matter, g 0.0054 0.0000 0.0000 0.0018 

c, A~erable Particulate Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 

E, Fi~erable Particulate EmoSSion Rate, lblhr 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.18 

E, Filterable Particulate Emission Rate, lb/day 11.60 0.00 0.00 3.97 

WuceM Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter, g 0.0052 0.0016 0.0024 0.0031 

CuceM Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Concentration, gr/dscf 0.00044 0.00013 0.00018 0.00025 

EucEII Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Emission Rate, lblhr 0.469 0.139 0.215 0.274 

EucEII Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Emission Rate, lb/day 11.24 3.33 5.17 6.58 

EucEII Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Emission Rate, lblton "0.028 "0.008 *0.012 *0.015 0.18 

• lblton of Green Anode placed on the Anode Baka Furnace. 

Table 1-2. Method 5 and Method 315 Test Results 

171Page 
8 Net Run Time. m11. 

ON Nozzle Diameter, in. 

c. P~ot Tube Coelicient 

y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 

Par Barometric Pressure, ln. Hg 

4H Average orifice meter Differential, in. H,O 

v,. Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, tr 

t, Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, F 

v_d Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 

v .. Total Moisture liquid collected, g Vwa1d Volume of Water Vapor, sci 

%H20 Moisture Content of Stack Gas. % %C~ Carbon Dioxide. % 

%02 Oxygen,% 

Md Dry Molecular Weight, lb/1b-Mole 

M, Wet Molecular weiglt. lbllb-Mole 

P, Flue Gas Static Pressure. ln. H20 

P, Absolute Flue Gas Pressure. in. Hg 

t. Average Stack Gas Temperature, F "~ ... Average Square-Root Velocity Head, in H20 

v, Average Stack Gas Velocity, fVsec 

A. Stack Crossectional Area, It' 

old Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 

o ... Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 

%1 Percent lsolonetic of Sampling Rate, % 

pb Quantity of green anode material placed in furnace, tonslhr 

Fp Particulate Fluoride Concentration. mg/dscm 

Fp Particulate Fluoride Concentration, ppm 

Ep Particulate Fluoride EmissiOn Rate, lblhr 

Ep Particulate Fluoride Emission Rate, lblday 

Eb Particulate Fluoride Emission Rate, lblton 

F, Gaseous Fluoride Concentration, mg/dscm 

Fa Gaseous Fluoride Concentration, ppm 

E, Gaseous Fluoride Emission Rate, lblhr 

E, Gaseous Fluoride Emission Rate, lblday ~ Gaseous Fluoride Emission Rate, lbllon 

F, Total Auoride Concentration, mg/dscm 

F, Total Auoride Concentration, ppm 

E, Total Auoride Emission Rate,lb/hr 

E, Total Fluoride Emission Rate, b'day 

Eb Total Fluoride EmiSSJOO Rate, lblton 

• Lblton of Green Anode placed in the Anode Bake Furnace 

300 300 300 300 

0.113 0.113 0.113 0.113 

0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

1.043 1.043 1.043 1.043 

29.70 29.110 29.75 29.75 

0.17 0.111 0.19 0.17 

71.6110 611.533 72.6113 70.292 

78.7 74.2 68.3 74.4 

72.821 611.345 75.225 72.064 

56.7 72.4 87.8 72.3 

2.67 3.41 4.14 3.41 

3.55 4.78 5.22 4.51 

1.5 1.11 1.2 1.50 

18.5 18.0 19.1 18.53 

28.98 29.01 28.98 28.98 

28.59 28.48 28.38 28.49 

.0.16 .0.15 .0.18 .0.16 

29.69 29.79 29.74 29.74 

219.9 215.1 212.5 215.8 

1.179 1.133 1.235 1.182 

75.75 72.58 78.13 75.82 

38.48 38.48 38.48 38.48 

130,002 124,284 135,142 129,813 

174,913 187,800 182,718 175,077 

102.1 101.3 102.5 102.2 i0·110 

18.02 18.02 18.02 18.02 

0.0107 0.0000 0.0000 0.0038 

0.0135 0.0000 0.0000 0.0045 

0.0052 0.0000 0.0000 0.0017 

0.125 0.000 0.000 0.042 

*0.0003 *0.0000 •o.oooo *0.0001 

0.062 0.161 0.371 0.198 

0.078 0.204 0.000 0.084 

0.030 0.075 0.188 0.098 

0.73 1.80 4.51 2.347 

*0.0017 *0.0042 *0.0104 *0.0054 

0.073 0.181 0.371 0.202 

0.092 0.204 0.470 0.258 

0.038 0.075 0.188 0.100 

0.85 1.80 4.51 2.39 

*0.0020 *0.0042 *0.0104 *0.0055 0.20 

Table 1-3. Alcoa Method 4075A-TF Test Results 

181 Page 
APPENDIX A

Testing Equipment 
Works. 

Golden Specialty, Inc. 

Trailer No. 11 

Constituent Make/ Model Operating Range Serial Number 

Velocity I Pitot Environmental Supply 00 P003NW 

Velocity I Pitot Environmental Supply 00 P0029 

Moisture/ Environmental Supply 00 1696 Meter Box 

Moisture/ Environmental Supply 00 1729 Meter Box 

FPM/Nozzle Apex NA 0.113 & 0.188 

02 & C02 CAl Model 602P 0-25% & 0-20% W02022M 

Table 1-4. Testing Equipment Used in the Compliance Testing 
I 
Professional Experience Summary 

• Broad background in environmental compliance and regulatory issues. Has directed projects associated 

with air permitting, groundwater contamination, air toxins emissions control, hazardous materials control and 

reporting, wastewater process control (metals removal), energy conservation, industrial ventilation, noise 

control, bioremediation, and storm water control. 

• Extensive background in emission testing, with over 1,600 tests personally conducted and/or supervised. 

• Responsible for the continued development of testing capabilities and their research and development. 

• Provides project management for testing at assigned client's facilities. Provides field support to the project 

managers on testing protocols and methods. 

• Responsible for verification and validation on test data as part of a Quality Assurance/ Quality Control 

Program. 

Selected Pub I ications/Presentations 

Swiggard, Scott and Spellicy, Robert, PhD., FTIR Monitoring in High Water and Carbon Dioxide Environments. 

Presented at the 2003 Air and Waste Management Association 96th Annual Conference and Exhibition, San 

Diego, CA, June 22-26, 2003. 

Swiggard, Scott B., Comparative study of NH3 analysis and methods for SCR Slippage. Presented at Source 

Evaluation Society Annual Meeting, Kiawah Island, North Carolina, 2004 

Swiggard, Scott B., Identifying In-Stack Detection Limits and Handling of Non-Detect Data, Presented at Source 

Evaluation Society Annual Meeting, Rohnert Park California, 2005 

Swiggard, Scott B., Why Cooling Towers and Vents matter in Texas!, Presented at Source Evaluation Society 

Annual Meeting, Hilton Head North Carolina, 2006 

Swiggard, Scott B., How accurate are your standards?, Presented at Source Evaluation Society Annual 

Meeting, Hilton Head North Carolina, 2006 

Swiggard, Scott B., Bonnette Sidney, PhD., and Palomarez Jorge., Gas Chromatography (GC) Analysis of 

HAVOC's in Cooling Towers and Vents; including degradation 1 ,3-Butadiene in the presence of NOx 

compounds, Presented at the GAS2006 Conference, Galveston, Texas, April2006 

Swiggard, S., McCulloch, R. Stack Testing for Dummies®. Golden Specialty Edition. Indianapolis: Wiley 

Publishing, 2011. 

Professional Affiliations 

Source Evaluation Society (SES) - QSTI I-IV #2006-025 

Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA) 

Source Testing Accreditation Council (STAC)- Member and Board of Directors 

ASTM International, Voting Member D22, #395691 
Professional Work Summary 

• Broad background in safety, environmental compliance and regulatory issues. Has managed projects 

associated with Hazard Communication, Blood borne pathogens, Tuberculosis Infection Control, 

Respiratory Projection, Personal Protective Equipment, Life Safety Code, Fire Safety, Electrical Safety, 

Back Injury Protection, Workplace Violence, Employee Injury and Illness Reporting, Emergency Response, 

Hazardous Drugs, Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality, and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare 

Organizations (JCAHO). 

• Extensive background in employee Training in areas of: Hazard Communication, Blood borne pathogens, 

Tuberculosis Infection Control, Respiratory Projection, Personal Protective Equipment, Fire Safety, 

Electrical Safety, Back Injury Prevention, Emergency Response, and Computer Ergonomics. 

• Developed and presented intensive training courses for Health and Safety professionals at all NASA centers 

including: Occupational Ergonomics and Blood borne Pathogens. 

• While working for Texas Water Commission (now Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, TCEQ), 

she was responsible for the enforcement of RCRA program in Texas including the inspection and evaluation 

of RCRA programs at various chemical plants and other facilities handling hazardous waste. Was a key 

member for emergency response for chemical spills and accidents. 

• Extensive experience in Quality Assurance programs including serving as Quality Assurance Officer for the 

Environmental Health Laboratory for NASA-Johnson Space Center for 5 years, and managing the 

environment of care accreditation process of Kelsey-Seybold, Houston Texas, for JCAHO in which it was 

awarded. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty, Inc. (February 1999- present) 

Position: Vice President I Director of Quality Assurance 

Kelsey-Seybold Clinic (June 1995- February 1999) 

Position: Manager of Environmental Health and Safety 

NASA-Johnson Space Center (April1986- June 1995) 

Position: Health & Safety Training Specialist/Industrial Hygienist/Quality Assurance Officer 

Texas Water Commission (February 1984- April 1986) 

Position: Environmental Quality Specialist 

Professional Affiliations 

Source Evaluation Society (SES) 

National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Commission (NELAC) 

Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA) 

American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) 

Education 

Studies towards Masters in Science in Environmental Science, University of Houston 

Bachelor of Science in Environmental Management, University of Houston, 1984 

Source Sampling and CEMS Workshop, Walter Smith & Associates, 2002 

NIOSH Quality Assurance Officer Training, 1990 
y 

• Manages overall business operations for Golden Specialty operations outside the U.S. Gulf Coast 

• Accomplished team leader with a track record of increasing financial and operational effectiveness by 

applying sound business strategy principles and a diverse industrial background. 

• Experience base spans commercial laboratory, state government and environmental consulting for 

commercial and manufacturing clients. 

• Core competencies include financial project management and reporting, budget management, program 

direction, strategic planning and process improvement. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty, Inc. (October 2010- Present): Business Development Manager I Deputy Technical Director 

URS Corporation (July 2000- October 2010): Account Manager I Senior Scientist 

North Carolina Division of Air Quality (December 1994 -July 2000): QA Auditor I Lead Scientist 

Compuchem Laboratories (August 1991- December 1994): Staff Chemist 

Selected Publications/Presentations 

Robarge, W.P., Walker, J.T., McCulloch, R.B. and Murray, G. 2002. Atmospheric concentrations of ammonia 

and ammonium at an agricultural site in the southeast United States. Atmospheric Environment. 36:1661-1674. 

McCulloch RB, Shendrikar AD. 2000. Concurrent atmospheric ammonia measurements using citric-acid-coated 

diffusion denuders and a chemiluminescence analyzer. Atmospheric Environment 34:4957-4958. 

McCulloch, R.B., I Manufacture Widgets; Why Should I Care About Agricultural Emissions? EM, August 1999, 

27-28. 

McCulloch, R.B., G.S. Few, G.C. Murray, and V.P. Aneja, 1998, "Analysis of ammonia, ammonium aerosols, 

and acid gases in the atmosphere at a commercial hog farm in eastern North Carolina, USA," Environmental 

Pollution, Vol. 102, pp. 263-268. 

Swiggard, S., McCulloch, R. Stack Testing for Dummies®. Golden Specialty Edition. Indianapolis: Wiley 

Publishing, 2011. 

Professional Affiliations 

Source Evaluation Society (SES): QSTI I-IV #2007-098 

Air and Waste Management Association (A&WMA) 

Education 

Master of Business Administration (MBA), Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 2009 

M.S., Atmospheric Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 1999 

B.S., Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, 1991 

Total Quality Management 

Effective Leadership - NC Public Management Program 

OSHA 40-hr Health and Safety Training 

Win-Win Negotiations 

Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance 

RCRA Hazardous Waste Training for Managers 

Client Account Managers Bootcamp 
Professional Work Summary 

• Responsible for planning and managing sampling programs, daily assignments of field testing crews, 

sample analysis, data reduction, QA/QC reviews, and reporting activities. Services and maintains 

instrumental analyzers. 

• Supervised and/or participated in thousands of source tests across the Western United States and Alaska. 

• Sampling experience includes trial burns for a Metal Parts Furnace (MPF), Liquid Incinerators (LIC), and 

Deactivation Furnace System (DFS). Mr. Clark has designed and built a continuous mercury monitoring 

system including two analyzer based continuous monitors and three Appendix K systems. Some trial burns 

required supervision of up to 25 testers on site. 

• Participated in several test aboard marine vessels, both at sea and dockside. 

• Managed the largest mercury (Hg) project performed by a stack testing company to date in Oregon. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty, Inc. (July 2011 ·Present) 

Position: Project Manager 

URS Corporation (June 2010-July 2011) 

Position: Senior Project Manager- Measurement Group 

TRC (September 2001 -July 2009) 

Position: Western Regional Manager -Air Measurement Division 

Emission Technologies Inc. (August 2000- August 2001) 

Position: Stack Testing Division Manager 

Am Test LLC. (January 1995 -August 2000) 

Position: Senior Air Quality Specialist 

Penberthy Electromelt International Inc. (1990 - 1995) 

Position: Safety & Regulatory Compliance Manager 

Airo Services, Inc. (1987- 1990) 

Position: Project Manager 

US Navy (September 1980 - March 1987) 

Position: Chemistry-Radiological Controls Division 

Professional Affiliations 

Source Evaluation Society (SES) - QSTI HV #2008-229 

Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA) 

Education 

Naval Nuclear Engineering School, 1982 

OSHA 80-hr Hazardous Waste Training, 1993 & 2006 

QSTI Certification, December 2008 
Professional Work Summary 

• Responsible for planning and managing sampling programs, daily assignments of field testing crews, 

sample analysis, data reduction, QA/QC reviews, and reporting activities. 

• Supervised and/or participated in thousands of source tests across the Western United States and Alaska. 

• Sampling experience includes almost the entire gamut of EPA wet and instrumental test methods as well as 

several toxic organic (TO) methods and solid waste (SW-846) methods to quantify hazardous air pollutants 

(HAPS). 

• Experienced in the maintenance of in-house continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS), performed 

particulate matter (PM) and total reduced sulfur (TRS) testing and analysis, as well as data reduction and 

report generation. 

• Conducted testing with respect to wet and dry Kraft recovery precipitators and hog fuel boiler precipitators, 

and performed quality assurance procedures of ITT Barton total reduced sulfur instruments, as well as the 

maintenance and repair of NCG system. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty, Inc. (October 2009 - Present) 

Position: Project Supervisor 

Am Test Air Quality (July 1992 - October 2009) 

Position: Senior Air Quality Specialist/Chemist 

Simpson Tacoma Kraft Paper and Pulp Mill (February 1977- July 1992) 

Position: Shift Chemist; Waste Water Operator; QA/QC for Paper and Pulp, Waste Water and Air Quality 

Professional Affiliations 

Source Evaluation Society (SES) - Ql Groups 1-111 

Education 

Coursework completed towards B.S., Mathematics, Chemistry, Central Washington University 

Course 450- Source Testing for Particulate Matter (August 1992) 

Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) WorKshop, taught by Mr. James Jahnke (April1993) 

CSTOP Training, WA 
Professional Work Summary 

• Directed, supervised and scheduled and provided stack testing as required for nearly 119 permitted air 

sources. 

• Maintained and calibrated ambient PSD monitors. 

• Trained new employees to insure compliance with air, water, and RCRA permits. 

• As Radiation Safety Officer, insured proper operation of radiological monitoring systems, performed 

surveys for suspected radioactive scrap, and trained employees on personal exposure risks. 

• Performed required operational checks and leakage checks of sealed sources. 

• Reviewed and interpreted regulations for various air programs (Part 40, Part 63, Part 70, and Part 75) 

to determine testing requirements, appropriate test methods, and reporting requirements. 

• Compiled, reviewed and revised technical environmental reports and ensured compliance with appropriate 

State and Federal requirements. 

• Coordinated testing and secured approval of test protocols from State and Federal Agencies (KDEP, OEPA, 

US EPA) 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty, Inc. (April2011-present) 

Position: Project Supervisor 

Independent Environmental Contractor (2008- 2011) 

North American Stainless (2007- 2008) 

Position: Environmental Technician 

FBT, Inc. (1996- 2007) 

Position: Director, Environmental Services 

United States Army (1987- 1991); Army Reserve (1991- 1999) 

Position: Avionics I Communications- Electronics Repair 

Education 

University Parallel Engineering Courses 

Sinclair College, Dayton, Ohio 

Certifications 

Ql, Groups I, Ill and IV 

NRC certified Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) 
Professional Work Summary 

• Experience with EPA testing regulations, including 40 CFR, Part 60, Part 75, and Part 266, and TCEQ 

testing regulations, including 30TAC115, 30T AC117, and TCEQ Sampling Procedures Manual. 

• Over 6 years of experience and participation in over 500 tests in Texas, Arkansas, Ohio, Mississippi, South 

Dakota, Iowa, Kansas, and Louisiana. 

• CEM instrumentation projects include continuous analysis for carbon monoxide (CO), total oxides of 

nitrogen (NOx). oxygen (02), carbon dioxide (C02), total hydrocarbons (THC), and sulfur dioxide (S02). 

• Sampling experience includes flow stream characterization and monitoring of a number of types of flow 

streams for engineering purposes; including analysis using 3-D spherical probes per Method 2F, emissions 

sampling for regulatory compliance demonstration; emissions sampling for systems audit requirements of 

continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS). 

• Conducted isokinetic sampling and calculations for Methods 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2F, 3, 3B, 4, and 5, including 

sample recovery, preservation, and storage at the test site with associate sample custody requirements for 

the methods listed. 

• Knowledgeable in the testing requirements and procedures for the testing and analysis of Predictive 

Emissions Monitoring Systems (PEMS). Participated in several new source performance standards (NSPS) 

for development of new PEMS, including initial data collection of emissions. 

• Experienced in modified El Paso Method, Appendix P, (Cooling Tower Sampling for Volatile Organic 

Compounds); applicable to monthly sampling and troubleshooting leaks in Process systems. 

• Experienced in report writing, review, and finished product. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty, Inc. (February 2001 - Present) 

Position: Reports Department Manager 

Professional Affiliations 

Source Evaluation Society (SES)- QSTII-1112006-026 

Education 

Associate of Arts- Chemistry, San Jacinto Community College, December 2010 

Visible Emissions Certified (EPA Method 9), 2004-2007 

12 Hour Basic Instrumentation Training, California Analytical Instruments, January 2003 

Source Sampling and CEMS Workshop, Walter Smith & Associates, 2002, 2003 and 2004 

Preparation for the SES QSTI Exam Workshop, Walter Smith and Associates, 2005 

SkiiiPath® Seminars, Employee Management and Supervision Workshop, 2003 

Hazardous Materials Shipping Qualified, 2006 

Man-Lift Training, August 2006 

Fred Pryor®:Team Building Seminar, 2007 

Fred Pryor®:Excel: Beyond the Basics" Seminar, 2007 

Qualified Individual- Cylinder Gas Audits 

Qualified Individual- EPA Method 30B 

Qualified Individual- Portable Combustion Analyzer 
Professional Experience Summary 

• Proficient in operating and maintaining ambient air quality sampling equipment. 

• Proficient in collection, processing and analysis of meteorological and chemistry data. Species include 

carbon monoxide (CO), total oxides of nitrogen (NO.), oxygen (02), carbon dioxide (C02), and sulfur dioxide 

(S02)· 

• Proficient in maintaining, preparing and launching of meteorological, ozone (03), and sulfur dioxide (S02) 

sampling equipment. 

• Responsible for documenting and maintaining the tracking of project data and test reports. 

• In training for data importation for PEMS and CEMS RAT As, as well as multiple compliance test projects. 

• In training for report writing, review and finished product. 

• Proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, Power Point and Access. 

• Proficient in Esri GIS software ArcMAP, ArcGIS and ArcView. 

• Experienced in WaveMetrics scientific graphing, data analysis, image processing and programming 

software IGOR. 

• Experienced in C++ and MATLAB programming 

• Fluent in Dutch and English, experienced in German and French. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty, Inc. (February 2011 - Present) 

Position: Records Compliance Analyst 

University of Houston, IMAQS - Institute for Multi-Dimensional Air Quality Studies (January 2009- February 

2011) 

Position: Research Technician 

C. Hecht & Co. (Netherlands) (November 2002- November 2004) 

Position: Sales & Production Coordinator 

Grafico (Netherlands) (October 2000- October 2002) 

Position: Sales & Production Coordinator 

Grafico (Netherlands) (August 1997- October 2000) 

Position: Engraver 

Education 

Bachelors of Science- Environmental Science, Environmental Systems & Modeling, University of Houston, May 

2010 

Associates of Science - Engineering I Environmental Science, Houston Community College, August 2007 
Professional Work Summary 

• In training for instrumentation methods: carbon monoxide (CO), total oxides of nitrogen (NO.), oxygen (02), and 

carbon dioxide (C02). 

• In training of EPA testing regulations, including 40 CFR Part 60 and Part 75. 

• In training for source compliance testing and emission sampling methodologies for stack gas velocity, 

moisture, and a variety of isokinetic (wet chemistry/particulate) testing. 

• In training for performing maintenance and calibrations on a variety of air testing equipment. 

• Computer skills include: Windows 9x, Windows 2000, Excel, Word and Access. 

Work Experience 

Golden Specialty, Inc. (April 2008-present) 

Position: Environmental Technician 

Education 

8-hr CSTOP Training, WA, 2008 

Basic Plus Training 
APPENDIX CCalibration Data 
NO obstructions? /Vt7 

J./v da1:1aged? #cJ 

0 -10° < Cl) < + 100 <3 

I 

0 -10° < \)2 < +10° C) 

I 0 -50 < gl < +50 C) 

0 -5" < Bz < +50 0 

M :,tc I t•e•t•• U•ll •l'ltl ,,. 

lOt "· 1•1• Cl.l&.a:!nC, I. 0 0 

•••• , ..... c 

__ , ••• ::!oo •;• :r, ........ ··-:11· 

;;;..,::; 

. 

- ·-·'-· 

Co[ffilents: 

u;•u ... , ... ,,. un:c. •n•• ... 

•• Kt1.-..•a4 •I _..If 

u 

o.9t.fo 

o_'·no 

C) • '-11 0 

X 

X 

'( 

X 

y 

8 C/ 

A o.C\4o 

1. OS Dt < Pa < 1.5 Dt I o.l...\16 

1. OS Dt < pb < 1.5 Dt 0 ffi 0 

3/16" '"'<:: Dt '< 3/8" x 

A tan y < 0.125" )( 

A tan E < 0.03125" X 

-Pa = Pb ± 0.063" v 

Pi tot tube/probe number fe-003 ;l'y.} meets or exceeds all, specifications criteria and/or appl icabe design features* and is hereby assigned a 

pitot tube calibration factor of 0.84. 

Signature 

!:>ate &.-2?-Z..or/ 

•see 4G CFR r.o, Vol. 4Z, Ho. 160, Z. the min;...,,. 

Rev:-A-: 266 t 

Z inch Stlbick of the lhenooc011Ple lnd tht mini...., )/4 inch 

separ-•tion bttwnn the pitot tube lftd lhe noulc u shown H 

the top of this PI9C. 
I 

M:.•U t•O•tUf.C U•tl •ct.tft~ 18' ~,1•••••.: ,. f•l• C~t,..:te"' 1. 

A(o obstructions? _N(J 

fVd da~aged? f{cJ 

0 I -10° < 01 < + 10" G 

0 -10° < \Xz < +10° C) 

0 -so < gl < +50 C) 

6 -5" < Bz < +5" 0 

0 y () 

(} e u 

J 

0. Oflf 2. A 0 9&f""L. :1~1 •-.a•c••-< 4.C••'h 

..... , .... ,.. a:• :r,-..: 

........ 

;..,:; 

. 

-T-~ 

·-· ·--=---~ ~- u:•n ......... , .. ""'' rn•• ... 

•• Kn ...... ec ·• ~ •• . 

Comnents: 

.tP .;/?I 

(J 'f? ( 

--r-

'f.. 

'f 

'{ 

1.05 Dt < Pa < 1. 5 Dt I ~ .t../7 ( 

1. 05 Dt < Pb < 1.5 Dt e>.c(7 ( 

3/16" "'< Dt '< 3/8" )\ 

A tan y < 0.125" ]<__ 

A tan E < 0.03125" 'f 

-Pa = Pb ± 0.063" { 

Pitot tube/probe number (t?t~21 meets or exceeds all, specifications 

criteria ·and/or applicabledesign features* and is hereby assigned a 

pitot tube calibration factor of 0.84. 

Signature ~ fig 

•see 40 CFA 60, vol. 4z, No. 160. ~t~od 2. Vtrif'l the .. inimum 

Z inch setb•ck of the lhtnrocOliPI& and the llinii\UIII )/4 f"ch 

separation betwten the pltot wbe and the noulc u shown H 

the top of this ~9t. ltev:-A: 288 r 

Oa te ~ - Lt; - 2.. o ( ( 
C:llloanncnlo ond Soalngs\Sootlloll41122HF1\My eoa-..~~~o .. __ ajoclf"'""\Colollol<tof9oxSPoftlf.-:arTe-Jdu 

R..-ect· 12JOSIOl 

VetUon 2.3 

Model •: J c-~ooo I Sui•l •· 169£. 

ua a•nwwiw 

....... thocS 5 

522 a.rt .... tes- acn. CalihratiOD 

...... ,...t 01'1.fice .. tlaod 

aDgU.ah .. tar aoa UDit•. RDqllah Jt • •ac:tor 

:;~~~~:-;~:~~:;:~·:::j lrin. HCJI 

Theor~ie•J Critical V•C\.1 U 20 lin. KQI 

IRPOit'i'ANI' ror vahd teat. usulta. tM Actual V&C\1 ~ should ~ 1 to 2 in. H9 vreater thAn the- Theoretical Cl"itlcal Vacuu. aholotn o~bove. 

lPIPOnANT the Critic•l Oriflce Coeftlclent . K', &YSt be 'G't.ered in ~lbh un:.ts, lttt'"lwtdev fti'"O.Sttlin HoJ•c•inll. 

---------·-····- DRY CAS H!T!Jt READllrCS -----·----------

Voluae Vol~ Voluae lnttial Taps F1na l 1'•pa. Orifice K Orifice 

"" Tl .. lnn.1al Phwl Tot•l Inlet OUtlet Inlet OUt. l et Serial t Coatficant 

Un H10 lain I Ut'l Ut.'l Ut J ,.,. r•r1 t"Fl ,., ISH ~vel 

0.27 20.00 952 . 15 958.222 ' 071 16.. 0 17 0 , 0 ?i . Q :u·-cc o.::u1 0.,0 1) .00 9'iiJ 2 U •u u2 s uo " . 17 • 18 0 77 • Xf'-48 0 uu 1.10 10.00 H19J "~ 760 S.841t 18.0 n .a 410.0 18 . 0 xr-s~ 0.4'" 

' 10 8.00 "' 16 . 976 llC 6.410 80 . 0 78.0 u.o .,, 0 XF-6] 0.6lU 

l.lO ,.00 976 llD ,1!1 . 219 6.0., 82.0 19.0 84.0 80 0 XF-7) 0 . 80)1 

---------------- C.ITICAL OR.IriCE lt.!AOtr«;S ---------------

-- A.•eraQe Teeperaturet --

Actu.al -- Aal>ient Tecparature -- DQ! CCII Aabient 

Vo~cuua Initial Final ~v•r•vo Out. let Overall Tlin Hoi t"rJ 1·r1 ,., I"RI ,.,., t"RI 

22.0 7£.0 77.0 li.S 5)1.0 5U.I Sl6.5 

21.0 11.0 11.0 71.0 \ll.O 5)1.] \l'I.O 

10 • " 0 71.0 77.0 sn. ~ 5)8.] sn.o , . " 0 78.0 78.0 HIS SH . I 518.0 

HO • • 0 18.0 18.0 5n s su) 518 0 

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •tsULTS •·•••••••••••••••••••-••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 

--- CRY CAS AETn --- --------- ourtct --------- -- DRY GAS ftETER --

VOLUME VOW<E VOLUME VOLU>!I VOL'-"! I Co\LIBilATION nCTOR 

CORRECTED COIU<EC'rED COIUtl'CTED CORU'CT!D NOMw.u. 

V'IIIHdl V.lat.d) vcrtstdl vcrtstdl V« Value 

lnu.&berl 

1.0)2 

VAn.ation •a•• I Pail 1d.sct1 lltter•l tdacrl 

6011 170.2 6.204 

5 fill 1S9 \ 5 no S.7U Ul 1J ' 087 

6 JJB 179 5 ' \18 

5 980 169 4 '259 

Uitenl 

llS.l 

lU.I 

171 • 

181 l 

171 l 

td•cfl 

6 . 2" 

5 9n 

6 156 

'·"5 

6.lU 

1 Cl46 

1 052 

1 Ole 

1.047 

Averava y ------·"r-1".~ 

Note; For Calibr"ation ,.actor Y. t.he rAtio of the rudino of the c•llbrAtlon IM!ter to Uo• dry QAS ,.ter. 

acc~Uoble tolerance of indivictu.l value• ha. th~ aver•o• is •-0.02. 

For Orifice C•hbution fActor OHI. th• orlric• dltt•renti•l pressure HI inct:e• of t10 thAt eqw~tf!:S t.o 0 7S etc of AU 

lnwtbel"l 

-0.\Hl 

O.OOJ 

0.009 

-0 ODS 

0.004 

•t 68 f" and 2,.!2 inchu of Hv. •ccept...t)le toleu.nce of ind1vidUot.l "'•lues boa the •"'•uov is •-0 2. SIC.'ttD Alex .J White 

Gc*ien~C~.Ud 

Pa•• 

--------- ORifiCE ---------

CALIBRATION ,.ACTOR 

A.l!i 

Value Y•lue variat.,on ,_ •• I htl 

tin HZOI 1- HlOI lin HZO) 

l.SU H U -0 .<171 

1.626 U.Jl -o.ou 1.650 41 '2 0.012 

l 721 4J 18 o.oas l 629 41) J1 -O.CICI! .... Av~u.ve laHO ------·"1 l.tn J 4l '1 

Dat.e; ___ oe/2J/2010 

OeerPwt. t .... 

c.> 

...., 

0 

-<0 

0 
EPA Method 5 

Meter Box calibration 

Post-Test Orifice Method 

English Meter Box Units. English K' Factor 

Version 2 3 

Model #: C-5000 

Serial # 1696 

Date·---------> 

Barometric Pressure: ---> 

07/01/11 Annual Factor of Dry Gas Meter 

30.10 (m. Hg) I 1.o43 I 

IMPORTANT: Select the Post-Test orif1ce serial number that closely assimilates measured ~H during the last test . 

----DRY GAS METER READINGS---- ..CRITICAL ORIFICE READINGSVolume Volume Volume Initial Temps. Final Temps. OrifiCe K' Orifice Actual -Ambient TemperaturedH Time Initial Final Total Inlet Outlet Inlet OuUet 

(in H20) (min) (cult) (cult) (cull) (deg F) (deg F) (deg F) (deg F) 

0.28 32 . 00 512.359 521.976 9.617 70.0 70.0 72.0 71.0 

0.28 36.00 521.976 532.731 10755 72.0 71.0 75 . 0 74.0 

0.28 50.00 532 . 731 547.702 14.971 75.0 74.0 77.0 77 . 0 

1 I.. .. ... • ----RESULTS --- • • .... • • 

- DRY GAS METERVOLUME VOLUME 

;ORRECTECORRECTED 

Vm(std) Vm(std) 

(CU II) (liters) 

9.627 272.6 

10 721 303.6 

14 847 420.5 

---ORIFICE--

VOLUME VOLUME 

CORRECTECORRECTE[ 

Vcr(std) Vcr(std) 

(cu Ill (liters) 

9952 2819 

11 .175 3165 

15 492 438 7 

VOLUME 

NOMINAL 

Vcr 

(cull) 

9.953 

11 218 

15.610 

- DRY GAS METER --

CALIBRATION FACTOR 

y 

Value 

(number) 

1.034 

1.042 

1043 

Vanation 

(number) 

-0.006 

0.003 

0004 

Serial# Coefficient Vacuum Initial 

(number) (see above) (in Hg) (deg F) 

XF44 

XF44 

XF44 

0.2381 24.0 69.0 

0.2381 24 . 0 73 . 0 

0.2381 24.0 73.0 

--ORIFICE--

CALIBRATION FACTOR 

dH@ 

Value 

(in H20) 

1.630 

1.630 

1.627 

Value Variation 

(mm H20) (in H20) 

41 .41 0.001 

41.41 o.oot 

41.33 -0.002 

Final 

(deg F) 

73.0 

73 . 0 

77.0 

Average Y --> 1.040 1629 41 38 <--Average dH@ 

Note: DGM Calibration Factor must not deviate more than 

SIGNED:_ S Moye 

1 0.30% I% Error 

O/ E ( y """"'"" - Y,,;fic.) I 0 -,o rror= x 

Y,,!ftc• 5%.~----~------~--~ 

Date: 7/1/2011 

Average 

(deg F) 

71.0 

73.0 

75.0 

w 

(X) 

a 

co 

0 
c:-.ooc..m-onciSei'Mgsllley~~SPECIALTWIETERIOXCAUBRATIONSIMAINTANANCELOGI72!I\SEPI'EM8ER2010BOXI72951'TCAL -2.3 

-~-

_, 

_,. 

IIIRIIII 

[~;:] 

APEX INSTRUMENTS 

EPA Mltllocl 5 

522 Serlea •-Box Cellbrltlan .... , .. Orlllc•llltllocl 

Engllllll Meter Box Unb, Engllelt K' F-

~~-=-.! = l~Hg) ~~-....:-: 14.13 ~Hgl 

IMPORTANT F .. ___ .. _VBaUII_bel ID21n.HggrBwlllln .. _c.-t __ _ 

WORTAHT l'llo~~~ IC'. muabe-01 English oris, (11)"3'(doo R)"'.~Cnttorc-ll 

mnm• 

---DRI'GAS METER READINGS--- ---CAI1'1CAI.OAIFICE R£.-ooNGS ---

- "'*'"'• -

T..., 

-T-. RnoiT-. OriC:e IC'~ - _ _ y....,.,_. .. aH nne - Rnol - a.- - Oudot -· ~ - - - " ... (in H,OI (mini 1ft'! (II') 

[]]]]~ 

(111 

5.2:111 

5.3113 

5.4!!11 

8.527 

5387 lll!l~l~l~lililllll~ ------------------~n-----------------

- DRY Gl\5 METER - --ORIFICE--

IIOI.UME IIOI.UME VOWME IIOWMI: IIOWME 

CORRECTEO CORRECTeD COIIII£CTm COARECTBI NOMINAL 

Ym(llll) Vm(Sid) Ya1nll vue..- V<t 

(did) ~ Cdld) ...... , (dod) 

5.243 148.5 5.2811 148.1 5.288 

5.3518 152.8 5.4Sl 154.• 5.455 

5.483 1547 5.482 155.5 5.419 

8.544 115.3 uoo 111.9 8.8011 

5.381 152.7 5.0 1Sl2 5.411 

- F«~"-V Iho181iolll ... nBingGI ... __ ID .. Oyga-. 

---.,-...-•om.,.-ooeii+-0.02. 

F .. Ortfico~-6H8 .... _____ dH,O ... _ID0.76dmdlit 

1168Fonc128.82-GIHg.---GI-.aJ_flaoo .. -.golo...o.2. 

- Spec~o~~yeoo-.o.l.al. 

- DRY GAS METER -

CALIIRATION FACJOA 

v 

lnumborl -I 00!1 

1.011 

1.005 

1.00!1 

1.003 

-.g.v-•D¥:1 

-(IUnllor) 

0.002 

0.003 

.(1.002 

0.001 

.(1.004 

-/Fill 

w 

"-•611•-·1. 

z~A:£~ 

llt!f!! 

Value 

r .. H20, 

1.572 

1.5$1 

l .eel) 

I.S51 

1.773 

·-

--.g&T--

DGM DGM 

Outlol Ooerll -T-

('A) I"R) ("II) 

527$ 528.0 528.0 

528.5 528.1 lllll.5 

5211.0 5211.3 5:!9.0 

5211.0 529.$ 5:!9.0 

530.0 Sl0.8 5211.0 

--ORIFICE---

CAUBRAnON FACTOR 

lloluo 

- -/Fol (INn H20) r"H20l m - .0.070 

38.44 .0.0811 

42.17 0.011 

41.84 0.11011 

45.04 0.131 

I 41.10 

0.0.: 9- 3- '2.-o/o 

DeorPooi<.T-

(..) 

co 

0 

-co 

0 
EPA Method 5 

Meter Box Calibration 

Post-Test OrifiCe Method 

English Meter Box Units, English K' Factor 

Version: 2.3 

Model #' C-5000 

Serial # 1729 

Date:- ·-----> 07/01/11 Annual Factor of Dry Gas Meter 

I 1. oo1 I Barometric Pressure: ---> 30.10 (in.Hg) 

IMPORTANT: Select the Post-Test orifice serial number that c l osel y assimilates measured 6H during the last test. 

------DRY GAS METER READINGS--- -CRITICAL ORIFICE READINGSVOlume Volume Volume Initial Temps. Final Temps OrifiCE! K' Orifice Actual -Ambient TemperaturedH Time Initial Final Total Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Serial# Coefficient Vacuum Initial 

(in H20) (min) (cu It) (cull) (cu Ill (deg F) (deg F) (deg F) (deg F) (number) (see above) (in Hg) (deg F) 

1.10 10.00 638.598 645.210 6.612 67.0 67.0 69.0 68.0 XF44 0.4665 22.0 69.0 

1.10 10.00 645.210 651.826 6.616 70.0 68.0 71.0 69 . 0 XF44 0 . 4665 22.0 72.0 

1.10 11.00 651.826 657 . 526 5.700 71.0 69.0 73.0 71.0 XF44 0.4665 22.0 72 . 0 

-·-- RESULTS- ---

- DRY GAS METER- -----ORIFICE----

VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME 

:ORRECTEGORRECTED CORRECTECORRECTEl 

Vm(std) Vm(std) Vcr(std) Vcr(std) 

(cu It) ~iters) (cu ft) (liters) 

6.670 188.9 6.102 172.8 

6.652 188.4 6.088 172.4 

5 715 161.8 6703 1898 

VOLUME 

NOMINAL 

Vcr 

(cull) 

6.085 

6.100 

6.703 

- DRY GAS METER -

CALIBRATION FACTOR 

y 

Value 

(number) 

0.915 

0.915 

1173 

Variation 

(number) 

-0.086 

-0.086 

0.172 

--ORIFICE--

CALIBRATION FACTOR 

dH@ 

Value 

(in H20) 

1.673 

1.678 

1.670 

Value Variation 

(mm H20) (in H20) 

42.50 -0.001 

42 62 0.004 

42.42 -0.004 

Final 

(deg F) 

70.0 

72.0 

70 . 0 

Average Y ---> 1.001 1.674 42 51 <--Average dH@ 

Note: DGM Calibration Factor must not deviate more than 

SIGNED:_ S Moye 

IQ.60% l~t Error 

0/ E (Y,..,a~- Y,,fi"') 10 "/o rror= x 

Y.,..,fiu 5'.~----~-----~-~ 

Date: 711/2011 

Average 

(deg F) 

69.5 

72.0 

71.0 

~ 

0 

0 

-co 

0 
CITY, STATE: ~~ I Will 

SOURCENAME: &b. £N..eM., ~~ 

DATE : (,l 'ZA\ ~ l \ RUN NO. :. ___ ___;__-.-.L;ij(..;.;5::..;1~~-

MOISTURE (~,) = __ _.Q._ • ..;:.O_~.:...Q....;~'----- (See Moisture Sample Data) 

GAS ANALYSIS: % cq_..:..\ _. S __ % ~ %CO __ .__ _ 

MOLECULAR WEIGHT, dry basis ('4) g/g mole : 

Md = (0.440 x %C~) + (0.320 x %~) + (0.28 X (%~ + %CO)) 

Md= (0.440 x \.~ ) + (0.320 x \$.S" ) + (0.28 x ( g'l).O + ___ )) = ~~.q~D M, = Md (1 - B.,.,) + (18.0 x 8,.,) 

M. = u,.'ltlo (1 - o.O'f5S > + (18.o x o. ~~ > = zgA3c.,S" .v" 

VELOCITY TRAVERSE DATA: 

AVG.f t:.P = \ • \"' ..;' ~AVG.= \,11.3 •RP.= 1fi.(,fj 

STACK DIAMETER= __ -6.%..,..!.({_. 0 ____ f.,= __ ....;3.:...i~.'\»._.CS..__ ___ ~ = 1--~ · '4-3<,-~ CALCULATIONS: 

v, = 85.49 X Cp X AVG. ..;;p- X .J{T, AVG./ ( M. X P,)) = 

ACFM = V. X 60 X 1\ = 

Q,d=(1.00-B.,.,) X ACFM X (528/~AVG.) X (P,/29.92)= 

ISOKINETIC DATA: (If applicable) 

Vm(std) = \~'?> · '!) 5S NOZZLE DIA. = O·l 'i \ 

PERCENT ISOKINETIC = o.09450 x T, x vm(std) = q;.13 ./ 

P, X V, X 1\. X 8 X (1-S,..) 
Equations: 

USEPA (Front half Catch) 

grldscf = (Residual Probe Wash Weight + Residual Filter Weight, in g) x 15.43 grlg IV m(std) in dscf 

lblhr = (grainsldscf x Volumetric Flow Rate, Qsd in dscflhr) 17000 grllb 

POMIMCEM 

grldscf = (Residual Filter Weight+ Residual Weight of Containers 2, 2M, 3W, and 35, in g) x 15.43 grlg IV m(std) in dscf 

lblhr = (grldscf x Volumetric Flow Rate, Oad in dscflhr) I 7000 gr/lb 

Example: Source: ~~ ~ ~ ~ Run No.: \ 

USEPA (Front half Catch~ ((). o·~•L D ·OOOO: 

grldscf = ...,l ~.:=--:--v-'--<7""1.;__-t_-:-;....:...;~'_J.~_,)C-'--_.\-=S;....;._~...:.;3,..__ 

I'& '1 . S'5'S 

lblhr = 

POMIMCEM fl\;) < 

grldscf = 

lblhr = O.Q>Q~ X 1 150t,33S. IrS' (,000 O.QQQ'i4 ~ 11 '50\, '33S. ¥'5 

\ i>3 .55'5' 

-

.. 

:: 

;: 

o.ooot.ts 

;::. 

Q. ooo 'fZ:!:. 

o...-

Calc QA Perfonned by ?- :z/.ul£1 
CITY, STATE: f~~ 1 tV~ SOURCE NAME: &Ju. ~ ~ata ~ DATE: c,('ll11h RUN NO. : __ .._I_-.....:U...:..:.......1:...1.f_-4....;..0_1~51:\~ 

MOISTURE (~.) = __ --...JoC;Q.....;. 0=:..3::;..9.;;...')" __ _ (See Moisture Sample Data) 

GAS ANALYSIS: % cq \.SO %CO ___ _ 

MOLECULAR WEIGHT, dry basis (1'4) g/g mole : 

Md = (0.440 X %C~) + (0.320 X %0.!) + (0.28 X (%~ + %CO)) 

Md= (0.440 x t,<; ) + (0.320 x K .. ~ ) + (0.28 x ( ,.() + ___ )) = =z.tR~o M, = Md (1 - S.,.) + (18.0 x E\.s) 

M, = ze.qso (1 - o.o3ff ) + (18.0 X 0·03S]' ) = Z.f. S'7oz ""' 

VELOCITY TRAVERSE DATA: 

AVG.f 6P = \ .(1q l;AVG. = (,JjoJ •R P.= 2'1°1-'1 

STACK DIAMETER = ___ <l~~,_.O ___ f-.= _.........;:;3....:..7_· 'fCi_;.;;_ ____ ~ = 2.<( o 910Z.. 

CALCULATIONS: 

v5 =85.49 X Cp X AVG. ~X ./(T,AVG. /(M.XP,))= 1~ 17 v 

ACFM = V. X 60 X A,.= 

Qsd = ( 1.00- 8,,) X ACFM X ( 528 I~ AVG. ) X ( P, /29.92) = ( '2Jo,<rz. ... C, o .PJ ./ 

ISOKINEllC DATA: (If applicable) 

I _{ ?- NOZZLE DIA. = _.....;0::....;..., 0 lu..l ~-=---- ~= 1p A(.'# JC \0 8= __ .;;)V;::;..;;..:l>.___ 

PERCENT ISOKINETIC = 0.09450 X T, X Vml•ldl = 

P, X V, X An X 0 X (1-E\.s) 

Calc QA Perfonned by &< d11e{t 
Date 

Sample Volume (Vm(otdJ : ---=.2'"::' . ...,Qt51......,....__ ____ dscm 

Volumetric Flow Rate (Q.J: \'301 Ol'i ,Cj dscfm Ct(V\lll 

Particulate Fluoride (Filter) Analysis and Calculations 

Particulate Fluoride 

Total (1) (2) 

Man PM, Fluoride PM, Fluoride 

Run PM1 Fluoride Cone. Cone. 

No. Blank Conectad (mal ma/dscm ppmvd 

(1) PM1 Fluonde mg/dscm = M101 (mg) IV m(s"'l (dscm) (2) PM, Fluonde ppm= PM, Fluoride {mg/dscm) x 22.414118.998 x 293.151273.15 

(3) PM1 Fluoride lblhr = PM1 Fluoride (mg/dscm) 135.31 x a ... 1453,600 x 60 

(3) 

PM, Fluoride 

Emis. Rata 

lblhr 

Particulate Fluoride (Front-Half Rinse) Analysis and Calculatlonsk' 

Particulate Fluoride 

Total (4) (5) 

Mass PM, Fluoride PM, Fluoride 

Run PM, Fluoride Cone. Cone. 

No. Blank Corrected (mal ma/dscm ppmvd 

\ 

v v 

O·Ol01 ().Ol35" 

(4) PM, Fluoride mg/dscm = M101 (mg) IV rn(S1dl (dscm) (5) PM, Fluoride ppm = PM, Fluoride {mg/dscm) x 22.414118.998 x 293.151273.15 

(6) PM, Fluoride lblhr = PM, Fluoride {mg/dscm) 135.31 x a ... 1453,600 x 60 

Gaseous Fluoride Analysis and Calculations 

Gaseous Fluoride 

Total (7) (8) 

Mass Gas Fluoride Gas Fluoride 

Run Gaa Fluoride Cone. Cone. 

No. Blank Correctad (mg) mgldscm PDmvd 

l o. \ v ,; ().Ob:l-"Z.. O·O"l<li 

(7) Gas Fluoride mg/dscm = M101 (mg) IV m(..,l (dscm) 

(8) Gas Fluoride ppm= Gas Fluoride (mg/dscm) x 22.414118.998 x 293.151273.15 

(9) Gas Fluoride lb/hr = Gas Fluoride (mg/dscm) 135.31 X a ... 1453,600 X 60 

!Total Fluoride Calculations 

Process Data (10) (11) 

Total Fluoride Total Fluoride 

Run Operating Hours Emis. Rate Emls. Rate 

No. hours lblhr tonalvr 

( tJIA- v 

(10) Total Fluoride lblhr =PM, Fluoride + PM, Fluoride + Gas Fluoride 

(11) Total Fluoride tons/yr =(Total Fluoride (lblhr) x Operating Hours) 12,000 lblton 

(6) 

PM, Fluoride 

Emis. Rate 

lblhr 

.. 

o.oo52. 

(9) 

Gas Fluoride 

Emis. Rate 

lblhr 

v 

O·'t>'303 

Time 

t S": 1,.( 

Calc QA Performed by 
APPENDIX DField Data 
Port I.D. 

Distance from Fall Wall to Outside of Port 90 

Nipple Length and/or Wall Thickness 

Stack/Duct ( J) Blue Print ( ) Measured ( ) " 

Depth/Diameter ( >12 in.?) ?'f 

Width (if rectangular) 

Equiv. Diamter (if rect.) 

De= 2 DW/(D+W) 

Area (A) ( >1131n.2?) 

A= n D2/4 or D W 554/-1:f 

I> b Distance De No. Pts* 

Updstream ( > 2 Dz?) t4S.sff- (1._ 

Downstream (?. O.S De?) )114# I~ Cyclonic Flow Checked? Yes No NA 

Rectangular Matrix 

~-------------------- *Circle larger of two 

Pt. %Duct Dlst from 

Depth Inside Wall* 

1 J.l. l.b'l 

2 ;o.) 

Y-~' 

3 

~~--~ 

'(,_j 0 

4 Jt.3 1.."\.13 

5 t. 7.7 5<o.R1 

6 !oC. G,l.)l.l 

7 5'15 1 J,f g 

8 

1'-~ 

~~.~' 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

•oo not place closer to stack walls than: 

1.0 in. for stack dia > 24 in. 

0.5 in. for stack dia 12 to~ 24 in. 

Dist from 

Oustide of 

Port 

_8~9 

I'-\-.~ 1. 

1 '-.3o 

) 3.\) 

6'2..81 

rl.1o 

~I.\~ 

~l.') I 

Sketch of Location: In the space above, sketch a flow diagram of the test location; show the distance from the ports to 

the distrubances before & after. Sketch the cross-sectional area; show sampling port locations. In honzontal ducts, 

check for dust buildups & measure or estimate the depth. 

OA/QCCheck 

Completeness Accuracy____::::"" Specifications __ ~Reasonableness __ -

Checked by: -~b"~~'-1--~......=./).;...Pf"__ 

Team 

~ 

Leader (Signature/Date) 
l'(lllll 

I ;1 \' CIIII 

I ,·st Sullllll:tl'): 

Nott·s: 
2 GIS IOOmL 

3 Modified Empty 

4 Modified -200 g 

5 

6 

V _ Vm * Y * 5 28 * [Pbar + &l 

m(std) - (Tm + 460) * 29.92 

Vw(std) = 0.04706 * (Vr- Vi) 

Vw(std) = 0.04715 * (Wr- Wi) 

B _ ( Vw(sttl) ) 

ws - Vw(std) + Vm(std) 

%Moisture= 100 * Bws 

Dl Water 

Empty 

Silica Gel 

Md = 0.440(%C02 ) + 0.320(%02 ) + 0.280(%N2 +%CO) 

60 * (1 - Bws) * v5 * A5 * 528 * P5 

Oscfm = (T5 + 460) * 29.92 

. . (T5 + 460) * Vm(std) * 29.92 * 100 * 144 

% lsokmetzc = rr 

528 * V5 * () * P5 * 60 * (1 - Bws) * D~ * 4 

·J~J.L J'-.•1. ~- (o'fl.t'> (, ~~' I 

'1 __t-t 'B . .; So :..t.) 

As ------Stack area (ftz) 

Bws ----Gas moisture (fractional) 

Cp ------Pi to~ correction factor 

Du -----Nozzle diamter (inches) 

_g_s 

£.i.q 

'-\H GJ 

'}.0]_.~ 

Md -----Dry molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

M,. -----Wet molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

PbJr ----Barometric Pressure (inches Hg) 

P8 ------Stack static pressure (inches water) 

P s ------Stack Pressure (inches of Hg) 

8 ------Sample time (minutes) 

V; ------Initial impinger volume (ml) 

Vr ------Final impinger volume (ml) 

V m -----Dry gas meter volume (ft3) 

Vs ------Stack gas velocity (ft/s) 

V w(std;-- Meter volume at STP 

W; -----Initial impinger weight (grams) 

W r -----Final impinger weight (grams) 

Y ------Dry ~as meter correction factor 

Ps Oz 

COz Nz 

co As 

Ts Tm 

6P.,. Vm 

Vm(.<td Bws 

%Moisture Md 

M,. Vs 

Qsdm Qacfm 

% lsokinetic 
• 

loj-. _ _ .' . -

' 

' 

, 

Point 

ll·st Summar): 

Nllll"S; 

·r-- · -- - - ------- ------ --

·-.·:;:----,,-1 - r :>.kt.-1 . -· t lltn '"'t' 1\ktc·r-- - , ... - 1 \'nlullll' St:•l·l- l'l\\lk' Chen I \ II l.\.1! In C )ut ',ll 

.1 . ..1ft .J.li __ UJ.. 

_· .. -·-- 1:

_

'1£ --- I A 1 1.. .z 48 - ':J--, I ( _:].J_ ""2.. __ 

- · -1-·k.-r.o J3) 21l __ Q._ Jo ___ __ ] _'2.,. __ L _ 

i.. 1.,11. £ro I .-b.s __ -=-:.r-lil-! __ ,o l '-- _z 

f--- \:7P.:.Q .. _1_.\!..1.'?'"_ _kl::t . <) 1 o .I v :s 1 s..L .1. ____ __ u_::J.. _7JL . l. -1 (qzg_f JJ:Y J.:Ql __ 3 _-z..!.:) _ _l Jg__ L I 'L !I!J.5 __ i ____ 1 __ __ . ____ ___ tx,__ - __ Jo . 1. 

·l 

__ !_J.t.J!:l_' __ tJ..k 11-:':L]'1o ___ 2.l&__ _'l.{o__ - _ _iL_ _(_ __ 

j L')j_- _L_)_]__ __ 1_1] __ ltt_S_ --=- _0Y-_ __ 

{ _ \ ·!J\ . . ._11.o. __ _ -__ . 4S ___ _ ___ 7..._ 

__ 

L ..!&. __ lw ___ _ L_ __ 

.... _l_L(.go ___ 2 \8 }N.__U C, - __ !,j__ L _ 

____ t(_ j z.25.a .. __ _]__1]_,_l(u_ r-1.51-r--:- __ (,.] __ _1.__ 

-

__ 

"1.t8 .. __ li'1-- __ 1 __ z. __ 

__ _'J;:L](.,l,.) . .J_J_Q__ ...:.lt3_!__Q_:\1. "Lt] ___ 1 \(,J (_(\ __ c-_ 

__ _!_L:zJIJ __ __ 1.<;\ 

-- -t.)10 . ----

___ 

··-- r---- -------- --------·- --· ·-r---------

- -· --1---t------
2 G/S 100 mL 

3 Modified Empty 

4 Modified -200g 

5 

6 

Vm * Y * 528 * [Pbar +&] 

Vm(std) = (Tm + 460) * 29.92 

Vw(std) = 0.04706 * (Vr- Vi) 

Vw(std) = 0.04715 • (Wr- Wi) 

Bws = ( Vw(std) ) 

Vw(std) + Vm(std) 

%Moisture= 100 * Bws 

DI Water 

Empty 

Silica Gel 

Md = 0.440(%C02) + 0.320(%02) + 0.280(%N2 + %CO) 

M5 = Md(l- Bw5 ) + 18(Bw5 ) 

V5 = 85.49 * Cp * J I:J.Pavg * 

60 * (1 - Bw5 ) * V5 * A5 * 528 * P5 

Qscfm = (T5 + 460) * 29.92 

Qacfm = 60 * Vs *As 

. . (T5 + 460) * Vm(std) * 29.92 * 100 * 144 % lsokmettc = 2 rr 528 * v5 * () * P5 * 60 * (1 - Bw5 ) * Dn * 4 

l3cJ" 7 J..5.j ·5.0 

uS""'1. \ (.,51.1- ·7_ . I 'it~. { q25".6 41ct 

~~' 

2..5,.\D 

As ------Stack area (ft2) 

Bws ----Gas moisture (fractional) 

Cp ------Pi tot correction factor 

Dn -----Nozzle diamter (inches) 

Md -----Dry molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

Ms -----Wet molecular weight (lbjlb-mole) 

Pbar ----Barometric Pressure (inches Hg) 

P 8 ------Stack static pressure (inches water) 

P s ------Stack Pressure (inches of Hg) 

8 ------Sample time (minutes) 

v, ------Initial impinger volume (ml) 

V r ------Final impinger volume (ml) 

V m -----Dry gas meter volume (ft3) 

v_. ------Stack gas velocity (ft/s) 

Vw(stdrMeter volume at STP 

Wi -----Initial impinger weight (grams) 

W r -----Final impinger weight (grams) 

Y ------Dry gas meter correction factor 

Ps Oz 

COz Nz 

co As 

Ts Tm 

I:J.Pavl;' Vm 

Vm(std Bws 

%Moisture Md 

Ms Vs 

Qscfm Oacfm 

% Isokinetic 
jq 

Sample Time lou P static .- (} .1.() Filter Tare ,}\>v Mole 

Ambient F ~() 6H@ ~.l,\j:Z Filter No. ~~I Bws O· uuq 

K Factor o jou Nozzle dl: .I fi_d2:...11L_d3:..Jit_Avg: ~~~~ Stack Diameter: £Y 

Stack Doagram /n 

Start Time: Cl>'-1 \ ( Stup Time: OCfJ,. Cf 

~v 

Tesl Summary: 

E Notes: 

-

roont .~ Lavout - - ----

:\Ieier Condouon~ lcmpcmlurc 

p,,uu rome ar 611 Meter Stack rro~ Oven Foltcr Imp 1\.kter Meter \~c Volume E"t hot In Out 

l....r.l () \ <o \.1, <; '-\ ~. (, .'-l'1 0 l\1 ,... 2"'" (. 1.{1 - '(l uo (, 0 (' 

ISl.. ~~-~ \.41 \t t '-I '1'1..9," IS l..ll -v·\t..\ l"\<, - 4~ Le\ ~( ) 

> 11.( \ ,l..t() \. t\ 4.0\.l'{\ 219 ~'1 g "1."\~ - '-13 Ll ~L { 

"' .;& \ \-)l. \o\u ~13. 11\ Z.\S tl~t., 'li~ - L{~ ( e1 (.,'(_ > < 'X.v l, (oo 1.1..{ I ~g't .'1(( '2 \~ 1..'-l"\ 7 ,-c - L\~ fa\ l-1 ~ (J l\~ .~ t,'-'o •\ ,(..~ 4C.l I <11\ 1.\~ 1. "'l 1:1\? - c;-u {I'-\ G'-1 <" 

1 II\?. ( \. )~ \l t, S""o<; . c, ~ Z.l~ (..'·\~ (.,'"\~ - )\ (.'(" (;\( < ~ \ 1.1. <. \.s-o \.\ l ~1\ Q H. '1.\"-. ?..'il 2'-1/ ..... ')\ l..tC.t (; ...,- ~ ..J '\o 0 l .. ,.:;- \, \{~ .;J"'\. ~&o 2ol 1.'-\\1 'Z '{1 - ro Ct' 0'-\ <, 

z., \I}J .. i. <do l.l\ l )~"\(u .. <~< l~lil 2'\~ 7,1.\~ - (1- L{ (,"l s 

}7 \~1.~ \ ~1 (,f){) )~~ 'fZ-1 \~o ~~(o 'l-4~ - I}'-\ (}~ (1,- (p 

tl l1.0l..t ( ,'10 f.? I 57 2.5~ \ lql 2-'1(... Z~.tl - 5~- Co'S <C )- <... 

5 77),0 /9J 7 /.~Cb §'g..f.Jo,- 70;1 251 .:2-YY S(, <o~ ~c. (.. ~ L"\1~ ;.8l (.(~y s7<t. t(~o J .../7 j_ Lf (, .2.. <-I '1 - ' s-~ t8 ~6 ~ 7 'tC.,t. I t. eco ( . (, 9 2-Z..::. 2... 'IJ 2.-~ - s7 (Q';) ~7 ~ fJ 1Q\.~ l,r;Z ·,, '4, t, L~.21f 2..11 J..'11 .ll.-(9 - (.;! ')0 ~7 ~60 ~J Cj',t;:ff) " 

A'g i.\a_"L li 1.1 . . {ut.(.tJ 
2 GIS IOOmL 

3 Modified Empty 

4 Modified -200 g 

5 

6 

_ Vm * Y * 528 * [Pbar + &J 

Vm(std) - (Tm + 460) * 29.92 

Vw(std) = 0.04706 *(VI- Vi) 

Vw(std) = 0.04715 • (W1 - Wi) 

B _ ( Vw(std) ) 

ws - Vw(std) + Vm(stcl) 

%Moisture = 100 * Bws 

01 Water 

Empty 

Silica Gel 

Md = 0.440(%C02 ) + 0.320(%02 ) + 0.280(%N2 +%CO) 

Vs = 85.49 * cp * Jt..Pavg * 

60 * (1 - Bws) * v5 * A5 * 528 * P5 

Qscfm = (T5 + 460) * 29.92 

Qacfm = 60 • Vs *As 

. . (T5 + 460) • Vm(std) * 29.92 * 100 * 144 % lsokmettc = rr 

528 * v5 • (J • P5 * 60 * (1 - Bw5 ) * D~ * 4 

170-'f 7(,3.t. 1l.. 

(pCf:J.i.{ ~ '-1. ~ 1.\o ~ 'i~- "L yc;~.'} S}.:> 

"l..5l."7 

As ------Stack area (ftZ) 

Bws ----Gas moisture (fractional) 

Cp ------Pi tot correction factor 

Dn -----Nozzle diamter (inches) 

Md -----Dry molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

Ms -----Wet molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

P bar ----Barometric Pressure (inches Hg) 

Pc ------Stack static pressure (inches water) 

P s ------Stack Pressure (inches of Hg) 

8 ------Sample time (minutes) 

Vi ------Initial impinger volume (ml) 

V r ------Final impinger volume (ml) 

Vm -----Dry gas meter volume (ft3) 

v_. ------Stack gas velocity (ft/s) 

V w(srrl;-- Meter volume at STP 

Wi -----Initial impinger weight (grams) 

W r -----Final impinger weight (ghms) 

Y ------Dry gas meter correction factor 

Ps 02 

C02 N2 

co As 

Ts Tm 

AP avg. Vrn 

Vm(std Bws 

%Moisture Md 

Ms Vs Q~·cfm Oacfm 

% lsokinetic 
~ample Time 30 0 

;\ tul>iL·nt F (q I 

" LKIIll" CJ. I ' ... ( 

I' 'Ialit: - (!?, 1 G. I ilt a I arc ""J!t 

\ II a 1.(0 i~ rilh.t i'<o. • .4 ' 

Nn//le cll:.r./1} cl 2;C11 1"( d> :o./1}'\vg:O.Jt) 

ivltllc 

1111, 3 -; .. 

St,td. l>iamct..:r. 

~(;-1.9• ' 

- I / 'Ita ·t ltm.:: 1 > Z.> Stt~p l 11 nc 

z_~ 2o53 

No lL 

p,, .. ,, 

I J\\1111 
2 G/S 100 rnL 

3 Modified Empty 

4 Modified -200 g 

5 

6 

Vm * Y * 528 * [Pbar +&] 

Vm(std) = (T,n + 460) * 29.92 

Vw(std) = 0.04706 • (Vr- Vi) 

Vw(std) = 0.04715 • (Wr - Wi) 

B _ ( Vw(std) ) 

ws - Vw(std) + Vm(std) 

%Moisture= 100 • Bws 

f).t .,) {).~. Weter ~~>.DU 

Empty 

Silica Gel 

Md = 0.440(%C02) + 0.320(%02) + 0.280(%N2 +%CO) 

60 * (1 - Bw5 ) * V5 * A5 * 528 * P5 

Qsc[m = (T5 + 460) * 29.92 

. . (T5 + 460) * Vm(std) * 29.92 * 100 * 144 % lsokmetlc = rr 

528 * V5 • (} * P.~ * 60 * (1- Bw5) * D~ * 4 

(f,o.3. ~~~. 2 

'"'~.v 

G~g.'-1_ 

_S')$. I 2\b',c, 

'"'~' 

As ------Stack area (ftZ) 

Bws ----Gas moisture (fractional) 

Cp ------Pi tot correction factor 

Dn -----Nozzle diamter (inches) 

1.1 0~ l(n ~ 51o-1 

Md -----Dry molecular weight (lbjlb-mole) 

Ms -----Wet molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

P bar ----Barometric Pressure (inches Hg) 

P g ------Stack static pressure (inches water) 

P s ------Stack Pressure (inches of Hg) 

e ------Sample time (minutes) 

V; ------Initial impinger volume (ml) 

V r ------Final impinger volllme (ml) 

Vm -----Dry gas meter volume (ft3) 

v .• ------Stack gas velocity (ft/s) 

V w(srdr· Meter volume at STP 

W; -----Initial impinger weight (grams) 

W r -----Final impinger weight (grams) 

Y ------Dry gas meter correction factor 

Ps Oz 

COz Nz 

co As 

Ts Tm 

.1Pav Vm 

l!,n(std Bws 

%Moisture Md 

M,. Vs 

Q\·cfm Qacfm 

% lsokinetic 
Sample Time .?,ou 

Ambient F ..;-c;. 

K Factor ().fl..~ 

Stack 01agr~~ 

Mole __ 

Bws o. o<-( 

Stack Diameter: ~ "'{: 

Test Summary: Start Time: "1..\ 51o Stop Time: C"11..(.) 

w~~ 

Notes: _________________ _ 

5 

l'omt I une tll' 

~~ 0 13~ 

l. i5.5 1-35" 

) 375 \."3,o 

4 

5'~:6 !.lv 

) 7'i.v 1.1.( 

(, 93.8 \, 1u 

1 //1. .5 lt l1 

1 

/.~1-1 

i:.:o !~ ( 15~(.) k\o 

'1.. i(;,$9 \.}, 

3 !87.) 1.11 

t.( 7-rkJ i.~~ 

c; 22~() l.1( ~ 2 <-~;,.a l. 1.\ -1 

1~1.5' 1-1 ~ 'b l 'Ot!J t,1 \ 

JOV 

I 

,,,g •1{ 

Pomt 

Lavout 

Meter Condmons 

Ml Meter Volume 

0-\1 ~<-1.£.1~0 

O-llc1 .% -a.~·vo 

(A'" ''1). \u() ~\\ \' 111, )vO , 

c.\\ ~~ \ 'L\ l7 

() ·'~ 1~.; . .,-3 ~ 0 lt.\ 3~1 ,6\~ ,. 

Od\ 1,~), <"I<) 

IO~Il 

~<i1. ·1)\ 

(l l1 L{D\, ~~<; 

r, ll L.\ Dl. '2 \I 

(Ll (, Y1o 1 (u\ 

o, ,, 

Lll~. lob 

C'l 1\ L\1~ I ~D) 

6.\ ~ L\7.7. -~-l r 

.-

01 \'-) 4'1.(, C1~ 6 

L\1 \. Cl1 

o\lJ 

Stack 

l..\~ 

'1..19-. 

. 2t& 

'2.. \ (, 

r v" 

"") t ~\ '2 \1 

'l \) 

ll1 

'lll 

ll) 

7.r'i 

ll~ 

/tL 

_1\l 

ll~ 

2../<:o-} 

Temperature 

Probe Oven ~~lle_!..t( Imp i\ktcr 1\lctel Vue. ~ IL~~~ Ex11 In Out -=-

2L/o AJp.- ~ ~ 78 ?¥' 'L 

2. ...,, \ - 5=t 5( '71 ll "--

140 - - _{_o l~ l"J (. 

2."\ \ - - .;u l\ lv 7 

2--\1.. ...__ - '-\"\ 1'-\ lf z... 

~'I<) 

- '-

~(J 

'l, 11 7 

'2llv ..... . fo 71 - }-~ 'L 

·1 \\o ~s I) 7"1 ( - -

l"\1 - .... ':l'l 1_1 7i 2. 

l~~ 

-

- t.\ 'i l"\ '7'-' 7.. 

1 Y.n - - 1..\'l l~ 14 1.. 

]}'\(.' - - c:;I..J /_1 l~ z. 

'L"\1 

- -

~ 

ll 71 L 

2 '-\u ·- - ll<; 1~ ~~ z. 

_2:\.o - -- <;o ll [Z. t 

2 "\~.:~ - - '--\~ ll. ((. l. 

7f.l 
2 G/S 100 mL 

.) "' Modified Empty 

-l Modi lied -200 g 

5 

(i 

[ llH J V - V,n * Y * 528 * p/Jar + I3]j 

m(std) - (Tm + 460) * 29.92 

VwrstdJ = 0.04706 * (V1- Vi) 

Vw(std) = 0.04715 • (w1 - Wi) 

B = ( Vw(stcl) ) 

ws Vw(std) + Vm(std) 

%Moisture = 100 "'Bws 

b.fll ~lltll'tttc:r 11/~0H Empty 

Silica Gel 

Md = 0.440(%C02 ) + 0.320(%02) + 0.280(%N2 +%CO) 

V5 = 85.49 * Cp * jllPavg * 

60 * (1 - Bws) * V5 * A 5 * 528 * P5 

Qscfm = (T5 + 460) * 29.92 

. . (T5 + 460) * Vm(std) * 29.92 * 100 * 144 % lsokmetzc = rr 

528 • V5 * () * P5 * 60 * (1 - Bws) • D; * 4 

;

/1'1.~ 711.3 ("OJ~ 7 ~1'/.l 1u~- 3 ~ ~'l~ <r ... h..' 

A.< ------Stack area (ftZ) 

8..,_,. ----Gas moisture (fractional) 

C" ----·-Pi tot correction factor 

D" -----Nozzle diamter (inches) 

Ia 

\ 0 

11..'1 

1_2.-"' -

Md -·-··Dry molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

M.< -----Wet·molecular weight (lbflb-mole) 

P tw· ····Barometric Pressure (inches Hg) 

P g ------Stack static pressure (inches water) 

P_,. ------Stack Pressure (inches of Hg) 

8 ------Sample time (minutes) 

V, ------Initial irnpingervolume (ml) 

V r ------Final impinger volume (ml) 

Vm -----Dry gas meter volume (ft>) 

v_, ------Stack gas velocity (ft/s) 

V wt•·tt!;--Meter volume at STP 

W, -----1 nitial impinger weight (grams) 

Wr-----Final impinger weight (grams) 

Y ------Dry gas meter correction factor 

p< Oz 

COz Nz 

co A, 

r.. Tm 

llP "''" Vm 

101/(Sit/) B..,, 

%Moisture Mr~ M,. If, 

Q.,·cfm ,ctin % lsokinetic 
Sample Time _.,.JU>~­

Ambient F --c;:iv.-0 __ 

K Factor CJ ./ 2 t. 

Stack D•agram 

l'omt Tnne ,\I' 

'

.,) 9 0 \.&o 

') \~.~ \ t l.l 

6 S1.) \.'~'1 ( ..;-t, .,, \,(0 ~ /(',IJ I,"\( 

J. '1~ ~ \. )'1 

7_ 1\1 ' I ,"\o 

I IS\.\ ~) c, ca \(v,u I~ ~ 1t..8,S I ~o ~ 1\1, )' \ ')o 

c; W(, 3. I, s·tj 

"i ~1.\,Cl I t .o ~ 'Lt~.~ J.-52 

l. 7.~1 < I <...J 

t Lb'-\ l&o 

':)ul> 

"' g I ~l. 

1 

P static ~ 0 \ ~ Filter Tare tJ. H@ -"""=J~t== Filter No. --=-c.-- Nozzle dl:~d2 __ tt~d3: Avg .113 

Mole- Bws o .uq Stack Diameter: Test Summary: Start Time: 6i.\ •1.. Stop Time: 0? z. <.,. Notes: _________________ _ Po•nt Lavout Meter Conditions Meter .'\II Volume 01 \S 41.\ 5"::-\ 0 l'i 4~~-l{O 0 ',c, ct-to, c.,sq (J . I ~ ~f.{C 1(,~ l) ll 4L.\'\ '17\ 0,11 ~\( ,'\>o (J,\1 '-\ \~ . I '1'\ 0,\1 41..1 ( lO (J l'1 4.t.< ~~ l. 0-1.0 ~71 4~ o, \'l ~l(, ',c;- { I?IG IJI-?J tJv.:> L. '10 ~,,._,.-'-Ill .., <"'>'? o./9 ¥fl9~qcn ,J I Cf t./Cf:) llo 0 1._,0 t-f9q.5 70 ;:. {)·/ 21'-l "· ':i Stack Probe lu, 7'11 z \$ ("to -z.,~ 7.--\0 ~\C\ '1'-4 \ "1~ '2.1..\l LtO 2'11. 'b.\ 1LI \ 1.-1.'1 1:·1 I <.21) I ?J.t3 iS~ 7V\\ ll1 I 1vll 11~ z.{t '? 10 /j./~ zoO( Z-47 - 2-.v? 2--lk z:v, t,i-{~ 211 ') .---· ---·-·--·- ·-------- Temperature Oven Filter Imp Meter Meter Val (:\It l:\lt In Out - - ~u l. 'l. £.1 1 - - '-\9. { "-\ (.,\ '- - ' ~ _(._ ':l ~~ \ - - L..l~ (,'( <.c.-\ I - - L\l &6 (.,(, I - ~ L\l &51 (/1 I - ....... L.l~ 'l 0 (/1 I - -. l..{~ (7_ (.,~ \ - · - ')() lll .I\ l - - qq 11 li. r - - :)() ll... l\ I - - ~0 7_L 7 I l -- - 56 7~ 7t. , 7.3 I - - ~1._ 7'-1 - - - 5:J- 7 '-( 73 ( - - scr '75" 7) I . lo~' 
2 G/S IOOmL lo.lrJ Wa:ter fJ"-0 H3 Modified Empty Empty 

4 Modified -200 g Silica Gel 

5 

6 

V _ Vm * Y * 528 * [Pbar + -&l 

m(std) - (7;n + 460) * 29.92 

Vw(std) = 0.04715 * (w1 - Wi) 

B = ( Vw(std) ) 

ws Vw(std) + Vm(std) 

%Moisture= 100 * Bws 

Md = 0.440(%C02 ) + 0.320(%02 ) + 0.280(%N2 +%CO) 

V5 = 85.49 * Cp * jAPavg * 

60 * (1 - Bws) * Vs *As * 528 * Ps 

Oscfm = (Ts + 460) * 29.92 

Oac{m = 60 * Vs *As 

. . (Ts + 460) * Vm(std) * 29.92 * 100 * 144 % lsokmettc = rr 

528 * Vs * () * Ps * 60 * (1- Bws) * * 4 

7;?.,.q_ I '12.Q :t 

(, '\8.? 

g n.'2. 

As ------Stack area (ft2) 

Bws ----Gas moisture (fractional) 

Cp ------Pitot correction factor 

Dn -----Nozzle diamter (inches) 

Q .C\ 

oS 

J5_1 

R\.S 

Md -----Dry molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

M,. -----Wet molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) 

PbJr ----Barometric Pressure (inches Hg) 

P 8 ------Stack static pressure (inches water) Ps ------Stack Pressure (inches of Hg) 

8 ------Sample time (minutes) 

Vi ------Initial impingervolume (ml) 

V r ------Final impinger volume (ml) 

Vm -----Dry gas meter volume (ff1) 

Vs ------Stack gas velocity (ft/s) 

V w(strl;--Meter volume at STP 

Wi -----Initial impinger weight (grams) 

W r -----Final impinger weight (grams) 

Y ------Dry gas meter correction factor 

Ps Dz CDz Nz 

co As 

Ts Tm 

Vm 

Vm(std) Bws 

%Moisture Md 

M.. Vs 

Qscfm Oacfm 

% lsokinetic 

I 
Sample Site: C-LJ-Z.otl 

Date Samples Collected: '=- ~ z.ct ~ >v 0 11 Date Samples Analyzed: '--yo -ZcJ •' 

Number(fype of Tests : 

Number of Bags: 3 

Collection Method: 

Sample 

Bag Identification Time 

ts-z..l;) 

rer 1.. o-.> > 

~2. 2.1 

~"' -o 3t 

}'[) C~ 4 n. -o q 'LSo 

Fuel Factor (Fa) 

where %02 and %C02 are by volume 

on a dry bas1s and 20.9 1S the 

percenl by volume of amb1ent 

air 

Notes: 

Sampled By: 

Subm1tted By 

Analyzed By: 

02 C02 co 

% % ppm Fa 

/S.-5"" /.) 

o/8.0 /.6 

/1, ( ;, '2-

F0 Faclors for Selecled Fuels 

Coal Anlhracile and ilgnote 1 016·1 130 

811Uminous 1 083·1.230 

Ool Distillate 1.260·1 413 

Res1dua1 1.210·1 370 

Gas Natural 1.600·1 836 

Propane 1.434·1 586 

Butane 1.405·1 553 

Wood 1.000·1 120 

Wood Bark 1.003·1 130 
/tfJ/5 , -{t77,.... 

Component Cylinder Range 

Number 

Oxides High 

of Mid 

Nitrogen Zero 

Nitrogen Dioxide n/a 

High 

Carbon Mid 

Monoxide 

Zero 

#tkr 0 ~J s-7 9-- High 

Oxygen 4 (..}#{~) 1/ fl ~ Mid tJ~ Zero 

High 

Total Mid 

Hydrocarbons Low 

Zero 

Sulfur Dioxide High 

Mid 

Zero 

Carbon Dioxide .-d./H 0 l( I'/ t- High 

/J{,;H{II/7190 Mid 

!Yt- Zero 

ANALYZER INFORMATION 

Analyzer SYSTEMI1 

Type Model 

NOx 

co 

02 

C02 SO:~ voc 

Form # GSC·WP007-00S 

REV 2010-01, EFF 11/1/10 

Serial #I 

Analvzer ResPOnse Actual Cone. Cylinder 

System 1 System2 Exp. Date 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

2..1.., 1..... 2'2..'L % 3-l..} -J..oO 

/c;.s f(). ~ % 3c> ·<e.cJI > 

o. ( 0 % 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

e." ~.e..;- % ~. "_?<!..-.:!:!: .., """ .... ~./ ~I ,-.r:5 % s- z?-z.,t) 

0./ {) % 

SYSTEMII2 

Range Model Serial I Range 

ppm ppm 

ppm ppm 

% {poL % W (J'Lo 2. 1-""- o-1-o 

% 

"O'L 

% 

wo 'l.c> t. 't.."" CJ-20 

ppm ppm 

ppm ppm 

Page __ of __ 
, 

APPENDIX EReference Method Data 
Nipple length andfor Wall Thlcknesa, Inches Diameter, Inches Equivalent Diameter (only when rectangular) 

Area In equare feet 

Streight Distance before sampling location, Inches 

Number of Diameters Before Location• 

Straight Distance attar sampling location, Inches 

Number of Diameters After Location• 

Enter •p• for Particulate or •v• for velocity 

Minimum Number of Total Points 

Number of Total Pointe Chosen Number of Porta 

Number of Points per Port Draw sampling location, plan & top view. 

ONOC ChecYJ=. I J Completeness Legibility__ Accuracy 

Checked By: . ,\-- ft.., /) ()p 

Person I {Sianatura/Oatal 

v' 

OK OK OK 

6.0 

84.0 

38.48 

45.5 

NA 

>121.0 

1.4 

p 

12 

16 

2 

8 

Points Depth of Port Oagrees Inch H20 °F Feet/sec 

. 3.2% 8.7 ·----·-------·-1-----

_ 10.5% ___ ...11:.L__ ----·--·--·---·-· -·-----

19.4% . __ .22.3 ·- ·-------·--· -·------

.... . 32.3% .. 

_

33.1 ·--- --·----- ____ ,. __ ------·---.. --. 

67.7"L 

A6 80.6% 73.7 

-·"A7- 89.5% ·-81.2 --

-

.. 9&.8%-

·----· ------

81 8.7 --

82 10.5% 14.8 

. 83 --·22.3 ·--

·- 84- - 32.3%=-

_

-n1 

__ _ 

85 86 

87.7% 62.9 

---· 80.6% 73.7 

..... . 89.5% ·-·- 81.2 --

...... J!8_. 96.8-'!.._ ___ ,_!!.:!._ 

_, ___ ,_ ....... _., __ , ___ _ 

_ ,_ __ , _ .... _ .. __ 

-------

-----

.. 

--·- ----

·--·-- --·----- ---·--·-·--

-----

--- --·-·--

.. 

---

, 

_____ 

-------·------

_,_,_, 

___ 

-----·---- ---

.................. _ 

.... _ ..___ ---· ----·----

·----- ------·· ·-·----.--

___ ,.,__ 

-------- -----

i------·-·--- ---· 

______ ,, 

1--·----·------· ----·--· 

---------

_,_ __ 

""' 1------

-·------· _, __ , ___ --------

----·---·--- ---- -------------- ----·----

_, ____ , .. 

---···-- ---- -----·--- -----

__ ., __ _ 

------

,, ____ 

------- ·------------------

.--.. -· ....... ____ ,_ ------ __ , ___ --·-·- ___ .. __ ............. ___ _ 

--·---·-- -----·-- ---------

___ , _ ..__ _ 

Average 

ldacfm 

I 1_ IJ _A_ 

J' _v/' 

·r Leader (Sionatura/Oate I 

E · 1 
e 

DN 

c. 

y 

Per 

4H 

Vm 

t... 

v,...d 

Vac 

v_d 

%H20 

%C02 %~ Md 

M. 

Pa 

Pa 

t. 

"AP••• 

v. 

A. 

a ad 

a_ 

%1 

pb 

w, 

c, 

E, 

E, 

WIICEII 

C..ce11 

EIICEII 

E..ce11 

EIICEII 

Net Run Time, min. 300 300 

Nozzle Diameter. in. 0.188 0.188 

Pitot Tube Coelicient 0.84 0.84 

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.007 1.007 

Barometric Pressure, rn. Hg 29.70 29.80 

Average orifiCe meter Differential, in. H,O 1.19 1.27 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, ti' 185.346 196.587 

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, F 74.5 68.9 

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 183.555 197.446 

Total Moisture Laquid collected, g 202.8 259.6 

Volume of Water Vapor, sci 9.56 12.24 

Moisture Content ol Stack Gas, % 4.95 5.84 

Carbon Dioxide. % 1.50 1.80 

Oxygen,% 18.50 18.00 

Dry Molecular Weight, lbllb-Mole 28.98 29.01 

Wet Molecular weight, lbllb-Mole 28.44 28.37 

Aue Gas Static Pressure, ln. H20 .0.16 -o.16 

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, ln. Hg 29.69 29.79 

Average Stack Gas Temperature, •F 217.3 215.6 

Average Square-Root Velocily Head, in H20 1.145 1.190 

Average Stack Gas Velocity, It/sec 73.64 78.43 

Stack Crossectional Area, If 38.48 38.46 

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate. dry scfm 125,030 129,304 

Actual Wet Voh.metric Aue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 170,044 176,474 

Percent lsokinetlc ol Sampling Rate, % 97.7 101.6 

Quantlly of green anode material placed in furnace, tonslhr 18.02 18.02 

Filterable Particulate Matter, g 0.0054 0.0000 

Filterable Particulate ConcentratiOn, gr/dscf 0.0005 0.0000 

Filterable Particulate Emission Rate. lblhr 0.48 0.00 

Filterable Particulate Emission Rate, lblday 11.60 0.00 

Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter. g 0.0052 0.0016 

Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Concentration, gr/dscf 0.00044 0.00013 

Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.469 0.139 

Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Emission Rate, lblday 11.24 3.33 

Total Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter Emission Rate,lblton "0.026 "0.008 

• Lblton of Green Anode placed In the Anode Bake Furnace. 

E·2 

300 300 

0.188 0.188 

0.84 0.84 

1.007 1.007 

29.75 29.75 

1.43 1.29 

202.568 194.834 

64.6 69.3 

204.884 195.289 

257.7 240.0 

12.15 11.32 

5.60 5.46 

1.20 1.50 

19.10 18.53 

28.96 28.98 

28.34 28.38 

.0.20 -o.17 

29.74 29.74 

211.9 214.9 

1.273 1.203 

81.65 77.24 

38.48 38.48 

139,005 131,113 

188,537 178,352 

98.1 99.1 90. 110 

18.02 18.02 

0.0000 0.0018 

0.0000 0.0002 

0.00 0.16 

0.00 3.87 

0.0024 0.0031 

0.00018 0.00025 

0.215 0.274 

5.17 6.58 

"0.012 "0.016 0.18 
Net Weight of Particulate Matter from filter, g •o.oooo 

Tin Number 1112 Tare Weight of Tin, g 2.6406 

Final Weight of nn, g 2.6460 

Net Weight of Particulate Matter, g 0.0054 

Volume of Acetone, mL 72.0 

Net Weight of Blank, g **0.0001 

Volume of Acetone Blank, mL 198.0 

Wt.Nol. of Acetone Blank, mg/mL 0.0005 

Net Weight of PM Due to Acetone, g 0.0000 

Net Weight of Particulate Matter (Blank Corrected), g 0.0054 

Total Front-Half Particulate Matter,Jl 0.0054 

Methv!ene Chloride Extractable Matter (MCEMl Portion 

"1" Section (extracted filter catch) 

Net Weight of Particulate Matter, g 0.0003 

Filter Blank Weight, g 0.0000 

"2A + 2M" Section probe washes) 

Net Weight of Particulate Matter, g 0.0031 

Volume of Sample, mL 52.0 

WtNo!. of DCM Blank, mg/mL 0.0000 

Net Weight of PM Due to DCM, g 0.0000 Net Weight of Particulate Matter (Blank Corrected), g 0.0031 

"3W" Section - lmplnger Water 

Net Weight of Particulate Matter, g 0.0000 

Volume of Sample, mL 320.0 

WtNol. of DCM Blank. mg/mL 0.0000 

Net Weight of PM Due to DCM, g 0.0000 

Net Weight of Particulate Matter (Blank Corrected), g 0.0000 

"3S" Section- Solvent (lmplnger Acetone/DCM Rinse) 

Net Weight of Particulate Matter, g 0.0018 

Volume of Sample, mL 98.0 

WtNol. of Acetone Blank, mg/mL 0.0000 

Wt.Nol. of DCM Blank, mg/mL 0.0000 

Net Weight of PM Due to Acetone, g 0.0000 

Net Weight of PM Due to DCM, g 0.0000 

Net Weight of Particulate Matter (Blank Corrected), g 0.0018 

Total MCEM Particulate Matter (Blank Corrected), g 0.0052 

*For FPM results reported as less than (<)zero, zero was used for the calculations. 

••for results reported below(<) the detection limit, the detection limit was used for the calculations. 

E-3 

o.oooo 

1110 

2.6351 2.6346 

0.0000 

102.0 

••o.ooo1 

198.0 

0.0005 0.0001 

0.0000 

0.0000 

0.0001 

0.0000 0.0002 

52.0 

0.0000 

0.0000 0.0002 0.0000 

410.0 

0.0000 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0013 

100.0 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 

0.0000 

0.0013 0.0016 

·o.oooo 

1111 

2.5752 2.5751 

0.0000 

78.0 

··o.ooo1 

198.0 

0.0005 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 

0.0003 

0.0000 

0.0001 

50.0 

0.0000 0.0000 

0.0001 0.0000 

480.0 

0.0000 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 

142.0 

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 

0.0024 
Filter I 969 B,.meas 5.0 18.5 %0, !stack TC 

Ftnorwt. 0.3543 B,.sat 

Traversa Elapsed lime Clock Gas Velocity Velocity Slack 

Point In Minytes Tme Meter Temp. 

No. Begin End 24 hr Reading M' •F 

W-1 .. ---063.600 ·- ._1._38_ 1 .. 1!._ _2_15_ •. 

__ ,L __ .. .!!1.8 _37.5 ____ 065.720 _ . ...!:B.._ .. ..:!·.!.L 

3 37.5 56.3 078.180 1 35 116 218 

--4---;;r;:;; + ---;;,.2,0··- 1:12 _!!?_ 

--;::= --;;8+ -· :_ 1 - 218 

6 __ _!!;!.!._ 112.5 J 112 975 1 ·- _ _,_4 217 

1 112.s 131.3 I 124.385 _ 

8 01 135.715 -

s-a 150.0 168 8 147 040 

- 7 - "168.8 2,87.5 . 158 62 

6 _____ "187.5 

5 206.3 225 0 182 75 

4_ . ..!25.0 243 8 

3 ___ •. 243.8 

1 281.3 3000 

··----

·- f-

--- r--

f-·- -

r--

--·-- r-·- -

------ ----

-·-+--

--·····-· ---

---··- ------- ---

--·- ·-·-------·-

---··--·-----·--

Final 20:55 

193 996 

205.340 -

216.55 

22785 

238948 

-

-

-

-

238946 

1 . 0 218 

1 . 7 221 

1 - .__._1.!_ 218 

1 __ _:_0 216 

1 ··- ,__,_6 216 

1 . 4 218 1 218 

__ ._1 

-·--'-' 

.16 

218 216 216 

Dry Gas Meter 

Temperatura 

Onbce 

Pressuro 

Inlet Outlet M!an H,O 

_2!_._ ,_.E., 

_.,E __ 

1.24 1.18 

r--1.21 

1.13 

._.!.L 

_74 _ 

75 75 

-75 -

76 -

..!!.__ 

._!L.... 

75 

7& 

77 

!J.._ 

r- 74_ 

-

-

f--

-

-

74 __ _1!!!!._ 74 ___ ,_ f--l.:..lL 74 1.20 74 __ 

75_._ 

._1.31! 

_.-'!.:.tO 

75 __ 

_1.1C!_ 

76- _.......!:.!.!.. 

75_ .. __ 

74 

-

--

-

-

Sumoravg 185346 l13 1e 11144 I 217 I 48 I 1u I 1.185 I 

97.7 

1.014 

183.555 IP'IIIIIS lblhr grlacf lbiMIIIB1u 

5.1118 0.0054 0.4833 0.00045 

Flow 

73.64 

125,030.3 0.0054 0.4833 0.00045 

170044.3 1 

Probe 

Temp 

•F 

252 

248 249 249 253 248 249 

251 

248 247 253 

254 

251 251 250 2411 

Oven 

Temp 

F 

246 

250 249 

248-250-

247 

248_ 

247 2411 250 248 

248-

245 

249 248 248 

-

--

-

-

Coneenta 

H,O 

I H20 

.4 SG 

Fiher Ex t lmpng 

Temp Temp 

F •F 

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 

NA NA NA NA 

NA NA 

NA 

NA NA 

50_ 

54 

56-

56 

57_ 

57-

59-

50 62 

59_ 

62 

I_!!_ 

62 

62 

62 

61 

Pymp 

Vac 

Hg 

5.0 5.0 5.0 

6.0 

50 

40 40 40 

50 50 

50 

50 

50 50 50 50 

Max c::!IJ 

Vol. Post Pre 

(mUg) (mLig) (mLig) 

100 933.8 788.7 100 7532 764.4 

0 697.0 692.1 

200 948 5 904 5 

QA/QC Check 

Completeness // Leg<biity 

Checked By - +> J 

/ tSIQnawreiDate) 

Accyracy JL ./ f s/)a# 1---

J;;.m L;;'ader (Sognature/Oate) 

Reuonablaness 

E· 4 

Noles 

-

Net pin 

145.1 

88 

49 

44.0 

v 
Filter t 970 B,.moas 5.8.,_ _____ 

Filter WL 0.3546 B,.sat F"" IF.- IM. 28.371 M. 29.01 

Traverso Elapsed limo Clock 

Point In Minutes Time 

No. Begin End 24 hr 

Gas 

Motor 

Reading 

Veltx:•ty VeloCity Stack 

Temp 

•F 

Dry Gas Motor Orifice Probe Oven Riter Exit lmp1ng. Pump 

Temperature Pressure Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp. Vac. 

Inlet OuUot in H2( •F •F •F •F Hg 

. 239.648 1.50 1.22 212 72 7! ____ ______ 

____ 

1 

__ _ 1___ 1.so 1.22 212 11 1- 73 ____ __ ...m_ _!iL. _..!:!!.. 

_ _! ____ 37"!_ _ 58.3-1----- 269.175 1.50 1.22 213 70 72 ___ __ -· 248 ______ 249 __ N.!..._ ____ 50 _ 

___ ..!. __ 75.o.J___ 277.850 1.36 1.11 213 10 11 __ _ _M!_ ____ ill_ __ ___ !!'_ J..:!! 

__ _!. ____ ___ ps_ . ...l.:!L ___ __ ....§!!_ ___!:!L 250 250 NA 48 2 

_____ L___ 93.8 ___ _t..:.l!L ____ f!l!_ _ _ _Lo _ ........!:!L_ 250 250 NA 48 2 o __ 

112.s .J..E.!.:LJ-. ______ . 312.880 . 

1 

_ __!E_ _..!.:!L ___ !!!._ _ _ro -· 1.19 248 _ 2so NA 48 2 o 

1 

__ 1_!!_::1__ 150.0 . 324.780 ___ 1.30 1.14 _ _!!!!.._ __ 88 __ __!!_ ___ 1.1! 248 _ 250 NA 48 2 0 

W-8 __ !50.0 _____ 1.5!_ _ _!!!.____!!__ __ 88 249 NA 49 20 

___ !..._ __ __188.8 _!_!7..:!._1------- -- 348.320 ___ _!£_ __ _.1!!_. _.!!!_ __ _!! ____ 251 250 NA 49 2 L _____ !_ __ __187!._ 1-----·-- 362.355 __ __ _l!L_. _.!!!_ ____ 68 ____ 250 250 NA 49 2 L 

___ _!__ ------ - 375.341- _ _!.60 -· __ _88 __ 250 249 ...!!___ 2 0 

- : i :::: 

___ =j::- =-;!!= =--;:-- --:--- ::: ::: :: :: -

__ ..!_ __ ---·--- r-·-413.092 __ _t!?. _ _!!_ ___ 250 251 NA 4 2 0 

1 281.3 300.0 424.511 1.30 1.14 214 86 86 1.18 250 251 NA 4!._ 2 

-- :j= _3:2;:00.: =--=: == = ·-= 

-

-

-

-

-

-== 

-·----

____ 

1 

__ 

·1-- 1-

---------·1---·-·--t··--

--------1---- J..... __ 

------·-·!-·-+··-

-

·----·j--·- -

-

-

- -

-

- - - -

-

-

-

- 1- -

- -

- -- -

- --

Final 3:23 438.233 

Sumoravg 198.587 1.4200 !11902! 215.6 88.8 89.3 1.270 Max [TIJ 

101.8 

187.448 

1.022 Particulate 

grams lblhr arlsc:f lbiMMBtu 

Contenta Vat Poet Pnl 

(mUg) (mUg) (mUg) 

5.592 0.0000 0.0000 0.110000 1 H,O 100 9287 7191 

Flow 2 " HO 100 7301 7251 

78.43 0 6593 657 2 

129,304.1 TOIIII 968 5 925 6 

QAIQC Chock 

Completeness Legibility v ReasonablenoSt Chocked By: 9nr 

Personnel v (S>Qnaturo/Oatol 

E· 5 

Notes 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Net gain 

2098 

5.0 

21 

429 
Flltor I 871 Filter WI. 0.3531 

Traverse Elapsed Timo Clack Gas 

Poinl In Minutes TIIT1a Meter 

No. Sagin End 24 hr Reading 

S·1 0.0 18.8 I 4:15:oo 436.490 r-·--

_37.5! _)_8..:!._ 

r-!. 

___ 

37.5 56.3 

__ 

r-......! __ __75.0- .... 473.271 ... _ 

r·_s_ ..?.!·.!!.... __ II:!JI_ ---- 484115 ·--·-

r-....L- _IIi!:!... ·--- 497.87 

r-....I. __ .. !!!!.. 131.3 ·--- 5099 ·---

r--L- .. m:!. - ·-·-·-·-- 521 632 ·---

W·1 _!50.0 534.360 r--·- ·------ ·--

r-___!..- .188.8 187.5 5411.585 -

....... L ... .. !!!H . ..1_08.3 r:==--= ... - r--..! 

___ 225.0 i 572.58 --r---- --

r-..... L ... 584105 --

...... 

,l!J.8 599420 --

_ _]_ __ F==-- ---

__ !__ 300.0 ' 628.2 

-

839.0 

--

·--- --·- --L---- --

-------w-•-·•- ----1-- -·-

_._., __ 

=r-=--=-

-·-

--

-·--

f--.-

---·- ---··-

__ .. _L_ 

r---- --- __ J ___ ._ 

I 

··---- ------ ·---

.. -j .. -

I r··---

-------·-r---1·---

---- ----

.. -1-·--

I 

1---

t----

--

----

-

---·-

.. -r--

-·----

Final I 9:20 639.058 

Sumoravg I 3oo.o I I 202.568 

%lloldMIIo 98.1 

Ytfl 1.011 

!I ...... VoLdiOi 204.8114 

..._Vol.cbclll 5.802 

Flow 

.Mieo I 81.85 

dl!:fm I 139,004.8 

... I ,1f8,537.1 

Complotonoss • .:j Legibilioy 

B,.meas 5.6 19.1 

%Oz Stock TC 

B,sat FO• IF.- IM, 28.341 ... 2696 

locity Volocity Stack Dry Gas Meter OriiiC8 Probe Oven Filter Exit lmping. Pump 

Tamp Tamparalure Pressure Tamp. Tamp. Temp. Tamp. Vac. Notes 

AP 11AP •F Inlet OuUel H2C •F •F •F 'F Hg 

1.50 1.22 60 60 245 ,..247 __ 52 5.0 

·-. 

• .....!.:!!....... .!:21 217 61 81 -·-- __ ,24!_ 

.. 

1.18 218 81 82 _...!.:!L 248 ,_,ill_ NA 48 5.0 - -

.... ldL 1..::!5 2!8 82 62 ··--· _,J.:!fL __ __.!"..!._ _!!....., ....Ji.:!!.. .... ....:!9_ ... !:26 218 63 63 -·- _!:!1 244 1-.lliL... 49 5 

.... _,_o_ 118 218 114 1- 114, __ __ ...!.:!3 247 2.!!.._ NA 50 50 

...... :............ 116 r-..!!L 65 64 . .....J..:!L 249 248- NA 51 5 -

.... ..:!'!.......- 1.22 219 68 85 __ ..!,E_ 248 247- NA 51 5 

.5 207 85 114 

.. ....!:.4!.... 246 l_lli_ NA 50 5 ·--

.... 

1.34 198 85 114 

--· 

__ !.£__ 249 248_ NA 52 5 

... ..:fL.- 137 190 68 __ 1.50 248 248 NA 54 60 

... -=.!!!.... - 138 191 68 65 248 248 NA 55 60 

....... :!!..... 1.37 207 68 ___ 1,!!.8 251 248 NA 58 6 

-·---

.82 135 2..!1:_ 68 66 __ _...!:'!:' 246 249_ NA 58 6 

...... 68 __ 1.37 221L.. 66 57 __ ........!.!L 245 248 NA 59 6 

.82 70 67 249 249 81 8 

.,_, _____ 

-- ---

.... ___ - - - ----

-·---- - - --- -- r-

...... 

-

·--- --

- - - 1--

- - - -

- - -

-

- - -

- 1----

1- - - -

- - -

-1-- - f1- 1-- 1- - ,_.. 

1- ....... - -

I 1.8281 lu7341 2119 I 851 I 84.1 I 1.428 I Mu CIT] 

hid 

Particulate Contento Vol. 

-

Pool Pnl Nat gain 

grama lbllv arlllcf lb/MMI!1u (mLJg) (mLJg) (mLJg) 

A'ilnl 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000 1 H,O 100 963.7 789.3 194.4 

e.clc 2 H20 100 770.4 763 2 7.2 

1 ........ 3 M, 0 697.4 6948 2 6 

TGiil 4 SG 200 9462 892.7 53.5 

J A 

-./ V' In, L.f!11J= - _ Roasonablenoss --

Chocked By- !_1 DDf ¥ - D" -

Lea/or 

....... 

Person ISIQnature/Datel loam 

E -6 
9 

ON 

c. 

y 

PIIT 

All 

Vm 

t.n 

vmatd 

v .. 

Ywatd 

%C02 

%02 

Md Mo 

Pe Po 

t. 

'IAJ> ••• 

v. 

A. 

Qod 

a .. "'ol 

pb 

Fp 

F, 

E, E, 

Eb 

Fe Fe 

Eg Eg 

Eb 

F, F, 

E, E, 

Eb 

Net Run Tome, min. 300 300 Nozzle Diameter, in. 0.113 0.113 

Prtot Tube Coeficient 0.84 0.84 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.043 1.043 

Barometric Pressll'e, in. Hg 29.70 29.80 

Average orifice meter Differential, ln. H,O 0.17 0.16 

Dry Gas Meter Voll611e Sampled, II' 71.660 66.533 

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperatll'e. 'F 79.7 74.2 

Dry Gas Meier VollJ'ne Sampled, dscf 72.621 68.345 

Total Moisture Liquid collected. g 56.7 72.4 

Voll611e ol Water Vapor, scf 2.67 3.41 

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 3.55 4.76 

Carbon Dioxide, % 1.5 1.8 Oxygen,% 18.5 18.0 

Dry Molecular Weight, lbii>-Mole 28.98 29.01 

Wet Molecular weight, lbllrMole 28.59 28.48 

Aue Gas Static Pressure, ln. H20 -11.16 -o.15 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, in. Hg 29.69 29.79 Average Stack Gas Temperatll'e, 'F 219.9 215.1 Average Square-Root Velocity Head, in H,O 1.179 1.133 Average Stack Gas Velocity, It/sec 75.75 72.58 

Stack Crossectional Area, If 38.48 38.48 

Dry VOI1611elrlc Flow Rate, dry scfm 130,002 124,294 

Actual Wet Volunetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, aclm 174,913 167,600 

Percent lsoklnetlc of Sampling Rate, % 102.9 101.3 

Quantity of green anode material placed in tumace, tonsntr 18.02 18.02 

ParliciAate Auoride Concentration, mg/dscm 0.0107 0.0000 ParliciAate Auoride Concentration, ppm 0.0135 0.0000 Particulate Auoride Emission Rate, lblhr 0.0052 0.0000 

Particulate Auoride Emission Rate. lblday 0.125 0.000 Particulate Auoride Emission Rate, lblton "0.0003 •o.oooo 

Gaseous Fluoride Concentration, mg/dscm 0.062 0.161 Gaseous Fluoride Concentration, ppm 0.079 D.204 Gaseous FkJoride Emission Rate, lbiiY 0.030 0.075 Gaseous Fluoride Emission Rate, lb/day 0.73 1.80 Gaseous FkJoride Emission Rate, lblton *0.0017 *0.0042 

Total Fluoride Concentration, mgldscm 0.073 0.161 Total Auoride Concentration, ppm 0.092 0.204 

Total Auoride Emission Rate, lblhr 0.036 0.075 Total Auoride Emission Rate, lblday 0.85 1.80 

Total Auoride Emission Rate, lblton "0.0020 *0.0042 

• Lbllon of Green Anode placed In the Anode Bake 

E· 7 

300 300 

0.113 0.113 

0.84 0.84 

1.043 1.043 

29.75 29.75 

0.19 0.17 

72.683 70.292 

69.3 74.4 

75.225 72.084 

87.8 72.3 

4.14 3.41 

5.22 4.51 

1.2 1.50 

19.1 18.53 

28.96 28.98 28.38 28.49 

-o.18 .0.16 

29.74 29.74 212.5 215.8 

1.235 1.182 

79.13 75.82 

38.48 38.48 

135,142 129,813 

182,718 175,077 

102.5 102.2 90 ·110 

18.02 18.02 

0.0000 0.0036 0.0000 0.0045 0.0000 0.0017 

0.000 0.042 

"0.0000 "0.0001 

0.371 0.198 0.000 0.094 0.188 0.098 

4.51 2.347 

"0.0104 "0.0054 

0.371 0.202 

0.470 0.256 0.188 0.100 

4.51 2.39 

*0.0104 "0.0055 Q.20 
, 

g 

Fluoride Concentration in Sample, mg/L 

Fluoride Concentration in Blank, mg/L 

Fluoride Concentration in Sample, mg 

Fluoride Concentration in Blank, mg 

Fluoride Concentration in Sample (less blank), mg 

Fluoride Concentration in Sample, mg/dscm 

Auoride Emission Concentration, ppm 

Gaseous Fluoride Emissions llmalnaer Contents\ 

Auoride Detection Umit, mg/L 

Total Volume of Sample, mL Total Volume of Blank, mL 

Auoride Detection Umit, mg 

Auoride Concentration in Sample, mg/L 

Auoride Concentration in Blank, mg/L 

Auoride Concentration in Sample, mg 

Auoride Concentration in Blank, mg 

Auoride Concentration in Sample (less blank), mg 

Fluoride Concentration In Sample, mg/dscm 

Fluoride Emission Concentration, ppm 

E-8 

0.17 

<0.06 

0.034 0.012 0.022 

0.0107 0.0135 

0.06 

400 

200 

0.024 

0.35 

<0.06 

0.140 

0.012 

0.128 0.062 0.079 

<0.06 <0.06 

0.012 0.012 0.000 

0.0000 0.0000 

0.06 

315 

200 

0.019 

1.03 

<0.06 

0.324 

0.012 0.312 0.161 0.204 

<0.06 

<0.06 

0.012 0.012 0.000 

0.0000 0.0000 

0.06 

427 

200 

0.026 

1.88 

<0.06 

0.803 0.012 0.791 0.371 0.470 
Riter I A 

FllterWt. 

Traverse Elapsed Time Clock Gas 

Point In Monutes Tome Meter 

No. Begin End 24 hr Reading 

S-8 15:25:00 I--28G.448 --

_]__ •. .!JI.8 __17.5. 

__ & ___ 37.5 56.3 

.. 

""' 303.515 

B,meas 3.6 18.5 

B,.sal 100.0 Fo.. 

Veloclty Velocity Stack Dry Gas 1.4eter Orilice 

Temp. Temperature Pressure 

M' •F Inlet OuUet t.H in H20 

1.70 1.30 216 73 72 0.21 

- ·-----

·- 1.55 - 75 - 74 ·-· 0.18 

_!£__ 1.27 1--220 rr - 7L_ 

__ ....l,!i2 p23 - 220 76 __ 0.19 

---"-··- ... !!&.. 93.8_ -·--·- 308.255 -- 1.28 ·- pl.L 220 79 77 0.18 

... .. .!.12.5_ ----- 312.840 ___ ___!.:!L ..J.E 222 80 78 0.15 

2 _112:!,1_131.3 _,_, ___ 318.988 1.30 1.14 221 80 79 0.18 

1 -;-Et.: 1=- 321.150 1.32 . ...!:..1_L 223 81 _!!__ 1- 0.17 __ W-fl __ 325.412 -- 1.41 1.11 219 80 80 I- 0.18 t--·-L0 329.950 .. ...!:...."L. 80 _!!!_ 0.18 

___ !._._ 334.430 

·---

_ __ 1_.g_,_ 82 81 - 0.19 

____ 5 __ 338.170 

-

1.40 ...!.:!! 83 82_ 0.18 

_...!_ __ ;*;:F=- 343.930 _____ _,..h!L r-W r--221 84 82 0.14 _ _1 ___ 348.280 - 1.28 1.13 221 85 83 0.16 352.550 -- __ _Lli._ 221 84 84 0.18 1 281.3 300.0 358.870 1.35 ..!.:1!.. 22'!._ 83 83 0.17 ·-------- ----

__ _,. 20:53:00 381.108 

- -·--- --- -

=::·I== -· -·----- ·---- --- ----- -·-

·----·-- -·----·---·--- --·-- ···-·---1--- -

, ___ 

----·--- ---- 1- r---

----- --

_ _, ____ 

----- - - -

---- --·-----·-- -

-----·- -·------ - - -

--- -·----·--- --·-- -

I 

--- ·-·---l- - -·--· ------·- -·· -

--- ---·-··--- - -

--- ---·--

----····-- --·---·-- - -

---··---··----- 1- - -

Final 20:53 361.108 

Sumoravg I 300.o I I 71.880 I 1.3931 11.17881 219.9 I 80.3 I 78.1 I 0.174 

%......SC 102.9 

Yga 1.051 Particulate 

1-.......VoLdlct 72.821 arams lblhr arlacf lbiMMB1u 

...... VoLci.clll 2.057 l'rant 

Flow 8ltck 

tlfteC 75.75 1-.. 

... 130,002.0 TCICitl 

.... )14,913.4 A 

%0. StackTC 

IF.- IM. 28.511 Mo 28.98 

Probe Oven Filer Exit lmplllg Pump 

Temp. Temp. Temp. Temp Vac Notes 

•F •F F "F Hg 

240 NA 58 2.0 

----·----

241 NA 

.. ..!L. 2.0 

NA NA ..2!.,_ 2.0 

.. lli... __ M_ __ - . ,_56 2.0 _ 

245 NA NA 57 2.0 

I- 245- NA NA 57 2.0 

246 - NA NA 56 2.0 

245 NA NA 61 2.0 246 NA NA 81 2.0 

1---244 NA NA 82 2.0_ 1--

240 NA NA _ 57_ 2.0_ -

241 NA NA 58 2.0 

-

248_ NA 58 2.0 -248_ NA 60 2.L 

1--245 NA 61 __bL 

r-246 NA NA 62 2.0 

-

- -

1-- - -1--- -

-

- - - -

- -

- --

- - - - - -

- -

-

- -

I Mu [2:] 

lmpiDIIII'8 

c_,. VDI. Post Pre Ne1 gain (mUg) (mUg) (mUg) 

1 0.1 NNaOH 100 7943 7569 374 I 0.1 NNaDH tOO 7303 7282 21 

3 M, 0 6490 6484 06 

.. SG 200 8751 8585 166 

PA10C Check a { ; Legibility v Reasonableness v Completeness 

Checked By: \ { .L¥ Z'i" 72_ 

Personnel( (S;grtature/Date) 

E-9 
Arter WI. 

Traverse Elapsed llmel Clock Gas 

Pcint In Minutes Tlme Meter 

No Begn End 24 hr Reading 

W·1 I _o::-4 1e.e 21:56:00 _ _!64.480 --

2 18.8 .J-.!!:!. -

3 373.100 

-·-----

4 

- --

5 r-1-5.0 93.8 ·-

__ 

6 ,_!3·8 _j 12.5 385.533 -

7 112.5_1131.3 389.515 -

8 131.3_j_150 0 393.510 __ --

S-1 J. 168.8 - 397.535 

2 

- 'i' 401.885 3 206.3 4 225.0 4_10.505-

5 -- 414.700 __ 

6 262.5 418.802 

7 _w.s 281.3 - 422.815 -

8 300.0 

-

-=-1. 3·20"00 - --

---- - ---

--- -- -·- --

--- - ·-

-

-

-

r---

-

- IFlna I 0 431 013 

rr:J I 66.533 

'!(,llc*bllct 101.3 

Tep 1.047 

I-.-Vol. diet 68.345 

Vol. ... 1.936 

Flow 

I 72.58 

1 124,294.3 

1 167,600.4 

OAIQCCheck Completeness L.eglllilty Checlled By / 

Personnel ( (SiQnature/Date) 

B,.sat Fo- IF.- IU. 28.481 ... 29.01 

Velocity Velocity Stack OryGu Meter On lice Probe Oven FdterEx1t lrnplng. Pump 

Temp Tempera lUre Pressure Temp. Temp. Temp Te""4'. Vac Notes 

&P •F Inlet Outlet H in H2( •F •F •F •F Hg 

1.38 1.17 

. ..!!!__ 78 78 0.17 240 NA NA 51 2.0 -·- -------------- --- ---

r--!,;1§_ _!:)_!; __ r-218 77 77 0.16 __ _lli_ _.J!A_, 2.0 

1.30 1.14 218 77 77 

--

0.16 NA NA 50 2.0 

__ 1.12_ 75 76 _ _!1-..!L_ .••.•. 241 __ !!L 

_ _.!:!!__ 215 74 75 ,. __ __!!,_!!i __ ... ...ML ... __ NA_ 2.0 -

110 214 73 74 0.14 240 NA_ NA 50 2 -

1.17 108 214 73 _74 0.14 240 NA_ 2 1- -

110 213 73 74 0.15 240 NA NA 4 2 

1.40 118 r- 212 74 74 _0.17 241 NA NA 4_ 2 -

1.39 118 212 74 _74 0.17 239 NA NA 4!_ 2. -

_ _El_ 117 213 _ 73 74 !-0.17 240 NA NA 49 2. 

.....!d!!__ 114 214 73 73 0.16 240 NA NA 5 2. 

112 214 72 73 0.15 241 NA NA 49 2. 

__!J.l_ 110 216_ 73 73 !-0.15 240 NA NA 4 2. 

.. _H.L 113 217 72 72 0.16 240 NA NA 5 - 2. -

. 

112 218 72 72 0.1.!_ 240 NA NA_ 4 - - -

·---- - -

--· -

··---

--- 1-

·--·M-- -

-- --·-·----·-- ---· -···- --- ··-----M··-·--

- ------ ·----- ---·-·-· -·-----· --·-- ------· 

- 1--- -------·---· ---·--·· --· ----··---

I- 1- - ---------·- -------· ·--------

----- -----·-·-- -·- -· 

r--- -·- -----·------·- --· _, __ -- r-----------

·- --·-- -·---··-·--·-- ---·-- ---

- r- ·--·-------------------r---------

-I- ·-------·-----------·- ---

- --------- ---· ------· --- 1---·-----

I ueso l11331 I 2151 I 739 I 74.4 I 0.156 I Max m:J 

Par1lculate ConteniS Vol. - Pre .-.gain larams lblhr arfscl lb/MUIIU (mUg) (mUg) (mUg) 

flail 1 0.1 N NaOH 100 785.9 728.2 57.7 

.... 2 0.1 N NaOH 100 779.3 778.3 1.0 

'-* , M, 0 592.7 591.7 1.0 T_. 4 SG 200 902.3 889.8 12.7 

f A 

V 

__ Reasonablenes! v -

-

E • 10 
c 

AltarW\. 

Traverse Elapsed Tome Oock Gas 

Point In Minutes Timo Me tor 

No. Begin End 24 hr Readong 

W-11 0.0 18.8 4:12:00 431.531 

--------· ·-

-·-·-L·--· 436.750 

6 37.5 56.3 440.659 

__ s __ 

. ...1!:.0 445.189 

4 750 938 449575 

3 938] 1125 453 930 

2 1125j 131.3 458189 

1 150 482 510 

6-11 1500 1888 488782 

7 188 8 187.5 

-

471 480 -

6 187 5 2083 476155 

5 2063 225 481 000 

-

4 2250 243 465 411 

3 243.8_ 282 489989 

2 2825 281 495210-

-

1 281 3 311!!._ 499 510 

3000 r 504 214 

I -t-i - -·----- ----1----- --- ---+------

. 

----·- -·--·---- ----

---·------

-·----1--·- ----

Final I 8:28 504.214 

Sum oravg I 3oo.o I I 72o883 

... .... 102.5 

Yqa 1.057 

l,..._v....-.i" 75.225 

0 cilcln 2.130 

Flow 

M.-o I 79.13 

.,. 1 135,142.0 

I 1 

OA/OCCheck /I I Legibility 

Chocked I /1 I b:.....D/2 

,

5.

, TC 

B,sal FO= IF .. IM. 28.381 ... 2B.M 

Velocily Velaclly Stack Dry Gas Moler Orifoce Probe Oven Fiher Elcit lmping. Pump 

Temp Temporaturo Pressure Temp. Temp. Temp Temp. Vac Notes 

b.P 'F Inlet OuUel 1M! in H,C 'F 'F 'F •F Hg 

1.60 126 1-218 63 63 0.19 242 NA NA 50 1.0 i----· -1.82 1.27 218 84 63_ __N_L_ __ll!_ 48 0 _ _!.0 

1.57 125 218 64 64 

-

__ 

240 NA NA 48 1.0 

1.50 1.22 219 65 84 

-- .... _0.18 - _NA 48 1.0 

1 45_ __ _ _h!_ 9 86 ,_O,.!L.. .. ... __ _.....£_ r-!,!!.. 

139 -

.. ...!.L. 0 88 89 _ __ 9.:.!!.... •. 0 __ NA .• _ ...£_ _!:!!_ 

,. 

-0 

1.1 --...1 70 89 _cg?__ ___ NA __ NA 48 1.0 

140 - __ .!:.L_ 

-

72 69 0.17 241 NA NA r-!:!! 

160 -

.... !:.L 3 70 71 .__!!:!L ... .. NA _!I!__ r-!:!! r161! 1.2 7.!__ 73 _!!.20 ___ i-..,1!1_ ___ NA 49 1.0 1-

1.50 

-

72 71 

·--· 

___ !!:.!.!_ _ _ _ill __ __ M._ __ r-!:L r--

1.5 1.24 72 71 , __ ...!!.:!!._ 241 NA NA 50 ......!:!!..... 

1o60 10 74 72 __ , 1.0 

1.52 74 73 _ _!)....!!.__ _!:9. 1.50 

.. 

09 74 73 __ _ _g..J!..... ... ___ NA _ __ ..l!L._ .....§L _1:9. r160 1.2 3 75 73 

---· _ .. ... 

245 NA NA 59 __ !:!' 

-r-·- - ---- -·M_M_ ··----_ .. _____ -·---- -

-r--r- -- -w•••----· ·--·-·-·--·· ---·-· --·--·-- ·---·- ·--·-

r---1--- --__ .. _ ··-·-·---- ----·-i-------· --

--·--- r- --··-·---- -----·-· -------·--t-··---

- -

-

r-- - -

-

-

-- -

-

r- - - - - r- -

- -

-

-

I u2so lu34s 1 212 5 I 698 I 69.0 I 0.186 I Max [TI] 

mDinVal Paat Pre Contenta Net gain 

grams lblltr gr/scf lbiiiiiiBtu (mUg) (mUg) (mUg) 

Frvnt 1 0.1 NNaOH 100 830.8 760.4 70.4 

·a.ct 2 0.1 NNaOH 100 7291 728.2 0.9 

a "" 0 649.6 6488 0.8 4 SG 200 892.9 877.2 15.7 

II 

Accuracy -fJn, 'i /1 u- '--' J.--- Reasonableness 'Ak_j£ fteam ... - -

E - 11 
APPENDIX FProcess Data 
Below is the production data for the source tests that was conducted at Intalco's Bake Oven Scrubber at the end 

of June. 

Thanks 

Trish 

From: Nordlund, Roger A. 

Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 9:04AM 

To: Bilskis, Patricia A. 

Cc: Morgan, Scott 

Subject: RE: Production data for June 2011 

Patricia, 

During the compliance test on C7, we had 7 fires going. To feed these 7 fires, we introduce green anode into 

the furnace at a rate of: 

608.7lbs/green carbon* 216 carbon/fire* 0.94 (fraction actually packed)* 7 fires/day = 

865,133 lb/day 

= 25,953,994 lb/month or 12,977 tons/month 

for 30 day month (June) 

We operated 30 days/June * 24 hours/day= 720 hours in June 

1 
APPENDIX GLaboratory Data 
Golden Specialty 

Lab No.: 

Project: 

GSL 110666 

Alcoa Intalco 

Prepared for: Paul Clark 

Golden Specialty 

931 Seaco Court 

Deer Park, TX 77536 

931 Seaco Court Deer Park. TX 7'7536 

1 of 11 

(II) 

Ph: (281) 476- 4769 Fax: (281) 476- 9876 
Paul Clark 

931 Seaco Court 

Deer Park, TX 77536 

Golden Specialty 

Project ID: Alcoa Intalco 

GSL Order ID: GSL_110666 

The samples submitted under the above referenced project name and identified by our Golden Specialty laboratory order 

number have been analyzed, and the data is enclosed. Only results for samples listed on the original Chain of Custody (at end 

of report) are included in this report. Raw data and subcontract data, if applicable, are attached to this report. Results provided 

in this report relate only to the samples. 

All samples will be properly disposed of when final report is submitted unless other arrangements have been made. Samples 

put on hold or held in canisters due to client issues will incur weekly canister rental fees. Golden Specialty reserves the right to 

return any unused samples due to hazardous sample matrices. Raw data and final reports will be filed for five years unless 

otherwise requested by client or regulatory mandates. To protect the integrity and completeness of this report, it must remain 

attached to this cover letter. 

I certify to the best of my knowledge all analytical data presented in this report has been checked for completeness and 

accuracy, and is free of errors. Any deviations from the stated analytical protocols due to sample matrix have been documented 

in the laboratory narrative of this analytical report. Unless otherwise noted, any analysis performed by Golden Specialty falls 

within the scope of our NELAC accreditation and meets all NELAC requirements. 

We thank you for selecting Golden Specialty to serve your analytical needs. If you have any questions concerning this report, 

please feel free to contact us at any time. 

Respectfully, 

Scott Swiggard 

Laboratory Director 

Tlus analyhad rtpOrt and data IISS«IIJitd luu bttn rrorrwed and pupartd sptcrficaily for you data packstgt rtprtstnts tilt btst aualyhcal ar1d ltchnrcal judgmnll and mtnprrtahon5 of our pnsmurri, rn accordanct 

wrth tht Goldm Spmalty l.slboratory Qu11hty Assuranct Mmrual Goldrn Sptcialty Inc. assumts no rrsponsilnlrty for tilt tnd ust of tins doeurntnt or any pornon txtractrd frmn rt Unltss rt r· othrrw!St agrttd upon. 111 

wntmg, and pnor to aualyhcal work, Goldtn Sptcialty Inc lrability may not acttd tilt arnount mvorctd for thrs ordtr 

931 Seaco Court Deer TX '77596 GSL_tt0666 Ph: (281) 476 - Fax: {281) 476 - 9876 

2 of 11 
EPA Method 315: 

Volumes reported for the MCEM portions of Container 2 are taken from the Container 2M volumes of the same run, and volumes reported for the MCEM portions of Container 1 reflect the volume of methylene chloride used for the filter extraction. 

The Washington Department of Ecology does not currently offer accreditation for EPA Method 315. 

Respectfully, 

Scott Swiggard 

Laboratory Director 

17rrs analyhcal rtporl and dtlta assocr11ttd luu bttn rtvitwtd and prtpartd specifically for 11w dab! pGclcslgt tlzt btst ttntllytical and ttchnictzl and intnprttations of our m accorrlmret 

wrtlr tht Goldnr Spmalty LAboratory Qu11lity AssurGna MDnual Goldnr Spmtdty Inc ass&nnN 110 rrsponsrbdrty for tltt tnd ust of this documtut or auy portio11 t:rtracttd from it. UnltSs rf u agrttd 11pon. 111 

wnhng, aud pnor to analyhcal work. Goldtl1 Sprcudty Inc liabrhty may not acml llrt amount mvorctd for tins ordtr 

931 Seaco Court Deer Park, TX 17536 GSL_ll0666 Ph: @) 476 - 4769 Fax: (281) 476- 9876 

3 of 11 
p

g

Test: 

Order ID: 

Determination of PM and MCEM by EPA Method 315 

GSL

_

110666 

Sample Analyst: Hari Pandi 

Date Sampled: 6/29/2011 

Date Analyzed: 7/25/2011 

Analytical SOP: GSL_TM030 

Instrument ID: 

QCBatchiD: 

Balance #1 -Sartorius 

QC_02811 

SampleiD 

Run 1 Filter - Cont. 1 

Run 1 Filter- Cont. 1 

Run 1 Acetone Rinse- Cont. 2 

Run 1 Acetone Rinse - Cont. 2 

Run 1 BH D1 Rinse - Cont. 3W 

Run 1 BH Ace/DCM- Cont. 35 

Sample 

Number 

-001 

-001 

-002 

-002 

-004 

-005 

Parameter 

PM 

MCEM 

PM 

MCEM 

MCEM 

MCEM 

Container 

Filter 969 

Tin 1129 

Tin1112 

Tin 1132 

Tm 1116 

Tin 1119 

PM • Particulate Matter 

MCEM "' Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter 

Sample Tan Post Test Result (g) 

Volume (ml) Weight (g) Weight (g) 

N/A 0.3543 0.3541 < 0.0001 

100 2.6204 2.6207 0.0003 

72 2.6406 2.6460 0.0054 

52 2.6348 2.6379 0.0031 

320 2.6579 2.6574 < 0.0001 

98 2.6424 2.6442 0.0018 

nus amdyt1CJll rtpOrt Gnd dslta assocaattd ltas b«tr rn~ittutd Gtld prtpartd ~CJfically for y.:tu 11~ dah:l p«dagt rq~rtxuts tht bt$1 lllli21ytlcaltmd ttehmc•l JUdgm~ut and rntcprthrhons of our ptrsountl. IU accorrUmct 

turth tht Gollkrr Sp«~alty LAboratory Quality Assurmrct Manwal. Goldnl Sptcrlllty Inc nssumts no rrsponsibility for the rud ust of th1s docurnDJt or any porhor• txlnctrd from rt Unltu zt 15 otl~aW~stllgtttd UPlUI. in 

tt•rihng, 11nd prwr to analyharl work. GDidn1 Sptcullty Inc liability '"oy not r:rcud tl~ amount lllfKJictd for thi$ ordn 

931 Seaco Court Weer Park. TX '7'7536 Ph: (~ 476- 4769 Fax: (281) 476- 9876 

4 of 11 
Test: 

Order ID: 

Sample Analyst: 

Date Sampled: 

Date Analyzed: 

Analytical SOP: 

Instrument ID: 

QCBatch ID: 

SampleJ!D 

Determination of PM and MCEM by EPA Method 315 

GSL_110666 

Hari Pandi 

6/30/2011 

7/25/2011 

GSL_TM030 

Balance #1 -Sartorius 

QC_02811 

Sample Parameter Container Sample 

PM = Particulate Matter 

MCEM = Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter 

Tare Post Test Result (g) 

Number Volume(ml) Weight (g) Weight (g) 

Run 2 Filter- Cont. 1 Run 2 Filter- Cont. 1 Run 2 Acetone Rinse- Cont. 2 Run 2 Acetone Rinse- Cont. 2 

Run 2 BH DI Rinse- Cont. 3W 

Run 2 BH Ace/DCM- Cont. 35 

-006 -006 

-007 

-007 

-009 

-010 

PM 

MCEM 

PM 

MCEM MCEM MCEM 

Filter 970 NfA 

Tin 1128 100 Tin 1110 102 Tin 1130 52 

Tin 1117 410 

Tin 1121 100 

0.3546 0.3539 < 0.0001 

2.6370 2.6371 0.0001 

2.6351 2.6346 < 0.0001 

2.6156 2.6158 0.0002 2.6237 2.6235 < 0.0001 2.6658 2.6671 0.0013 

Tiris tnJQlyhcal rtport tmd dsltD llSSOCJtJkd luzs bmr mntwtd and prtpllrtd sptcifically for you Titt data pacbgt rrprtSenfs tile btst 11nalyhcal and ttcJnuctJI J''dgment and mtnprtrations of our prrsmmtl, in accordsmct 

untlr thL Goldnr Spmalty Ubortllory Quality A..ssuranct Manual Coldnr Sptcrlllty Inc rnurntS no rtsponSlbtlrty for tlw tnd of thl$ d«umnrt 01' any porhon txtrGcttd from it. Unltss it is llgrttd upon, m 

wrihrrg and priOr to amzlyhcal work. Coldtn Sptcialty Inc lrabthty may not tXcttd tltt amount rnvozud fort/us ordtr 

931 Seaco Court Deer Park, TX 77536 GSL_l10666 Ph: (281) !76- 4769 Fax: '(281) 4116 - 9876 

5 of 11 
Test: 

Order ID: 

Sample Analyst: 

Date Sampled: 

Date Analyzed: 

Analytical SOP: 

Instrument ID: 

QCBatch 10: 

SampleiD 

Determination of PM and MCEM by EPA Method 315 

GSL_110666 

Hari Pandi 

6/30/2011 

7/25/2011 

GSL_TM030 

Balance #1 -Sartorius 

QC_02811 

Sample Parameter Container Smlple 

PM " Particulate Matter 

MCEM " Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter 

Tare Post Test Result (g) 

Number Volume (ml) Weight (g) Weight (g) 

Run 3 Filter - Cont. 1 Run 3 Filter- Cont. 1 Run 3 Acetone Rinse - Cont. 2 

Run 3 Acetone Rinse - Cont. 2 Run 3 BH Dl Rinse -Cont. 3W 

Run 3 BH Ace/DCM- Cont. 35 

-011 

-011 -012 

-012 -014 

-015 

PM Filter 971 

MCEM Tin 1127 

PM Tin 1111 

MCEM Tin 1131 MCEM Tin 1118 

MCEM Tin1124 

N/A 0.3536 0.3535 < 0.0001 

100 2.6300 2.6303 0.0003 

78 2.5752 2.5751 < 0.0001 

50 2.6279 2.6280 0.0001 

480 2.6335 2.6331 < 0.0001 

142 2.6336 2.6356 0.0020 

Tins analyhal rrport and d12ta assoaattd l1as bm1 rtVJtwed and prtpartd sptcrficaUy for you Tilt data pacblgt rtprtSt'tlfs tJJt btst muzlyha:J and tuhr1rctJI JUdgmntf and rt1 trrprttahons of our ptrsonntl 111 accord4nct 

w1th tlzt Coldtn SptCUZity LAboratory Qualrty Assurauct Manual Coldn1 Sp«1alty Inc assumts no rrsponsrb:l1ty for tilt tnd of thas documCJt or any portron txtracttd from 11 Unless 1f t.s agrud upm1, in 

wnhng, tznd pnor to 12nalyhc11l work, Coldm SptCJalty Inc lttJbllzty not txutd tht «mount mvozctd for thiS order 

931 Seaco Court Deer Park, TX '7'7536 Ph: (ml 476- 4769 Fax: 476 - 9876 

6 of 11 
Test: 

Order ID: 

Sample Analyst: 

Date Sampled: 

Date Analyzed: 

Analytical SOP: 

Determination of PM and MCEM by EPA Method 315 

GSL_110666 

Hari Pandi 

6/30/2011 

7/19/2011 

GSL_TM030 

Instrument ID: Balance #1 -Sartorius PM a Particulate Matter 

QC Batch ID: QC_02811 MCEM = Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter 

SulpleiD 

Field Reagent Blank Acetone 

Field Reagent Blank DCM 

Sulple Parameter 

Number 

-016 PM 

-017 PM 

Container Sample 

Volume (ml) 

Tin 1125 198 

Tin 1120 200 

Tare 

Weight (g) 

2.6277 2.6527 

Post Test 

Weight (g) 

2.6278 

2.6521 

Result (g) 

0.0001 

< 0.0001 

ThiS analyhcal rtporl and .Uta assoetaltd IUJS b«tr mlitwtd Qnd prtpartd spmfictJIIy for you Tht dAta p12cbgt rtprnt'nf .. tht btst tn112lytiad and teclnzrctJI and 1nkrprdahmrs of our ptrsonntl. in accordanct 

wrth tht Goltkn Spmalty l.i:boratory Qualrty Assuran« Maru.url Coldnz S/Hcudty Inc IIS5umts no rrsponsrbdrty for tht of tlus docurntnt or any portion tXtrtJcttd fram rt UnitS$ 11 IS otlwrwist agrttd upon, m 

wnhng, and pnor to tmalyhCtJI work. Goldna Sptcittlty Inc litlbtlrty may not txcttd amount mvorctd for tim ordtr 

931 Seaco Court Deer Par}<, TX 77536 GSL_l10666 Ph: (281) 476-4769 Fax: (281) 476- 9876 

7 of 11 
Method Blank Analysis 

Test: 

Analyst: 

Date Analyzed: 

Instrument 10: 

QCBatch 10: 

Mahix: 

Parameter 

Acetone Blank 

Dichloromethane Blank De-ionized water Blank 

Filter MCEM Blank 

Determination of PM and MCEM by EPA Method 315 

Hari Pandi 

7/19/2011 

Balance #1 - Sartori us 

QC_02811 

Liquid 

Volume(ml} 

50 

50 50 

100 

Tare,Weight Post Test Weight 

(g) (g) 

2.6264 2.6259 

2.5830 25823 

2.6220 2.6222 

2.6297 26297 

Blank Result 

(g) 

< 0.0001 

< 0.0001 

0.0002 

< 0.0001 

Tins analyhcalrqxn-t 4nd dAta as50CUittd has bMr rnntWtd 11nd sptet.ficalfy for you .Uta pacbgt tlrt bt-st amzlyhclll aud ttclmiC41 and mtnprtttJhons of our ptrsmmtl, in accordanu 

wrth tlrt Goldnr Sptctalty lAboratory Qutdrty Assurarra Manual Goldtu Spteudty Inc a55urnts no rtsponsrf"llty faT the ntd IJJe of th15 documnrt or any porhon t:rtnlcttd from tl Unit$$ tt rs agrttd upon, m 

wnhng and pnor to analytical worl Goldm Sptcuzlty Inc lu1btlrty mt1!f r1ot t:xcttd tlae amount mootctd for tlus ordtr 

931 Seaco Court Deer Park. TX 7'1536 Ph: (281) 476- 4769 Fax: @) 476- 9876 

8 of 11 
o MQL- Method Quantitation Limit 

o J - Target analyte is between the MDL and MQL values. 

o NC- Not calculated due to division by zero. 

o E- Target analyte is above the Upper Quantitation Limit. 

T1ns arudyhall rtporl and d.tzta assooattd l1as rmn«d and sptnfictllly for you 1J1t ddfa paclatgt rrprrsents tilt bnt ana/yhcaltmd ttclmtcal JUdKJrlt111 and mttrprttahons of our JNNOtlrttt '" accordm1ct 

unt/1 tht GoltW1 Sp«udty Ubor11tory Quality A.uuranett Manual Goldrr1 Sptcttdty Inc assr.unts no rrsponsibll1ty for tnd uSt of tins documtnt or any portrou txtnu:ttd fram tt UnltSs 11 IS otiiD'WISt agrttd upon, in 

wnhng and pnor to antdyhcal work. Goldn1 Sptaalty Inc ludnllty tnll1( not tXcttd tltt amount mvorctd for th1s ordtr 

931 Seac:o Court Jl)eer Park, TX 7'1536 Ph: 476-4769 Fax: (281) 476- 9876 

9 of 11 
:~:l' ~ &OLDEN ~SPECIALTY 6SL_ 110~" (I oF- 2.) Chain of Custody 

Pro.Al.IN\109 ,.'.. ..J~ntName AfCOA,.OinlalcoWorb 

~·~~~~ r:ca'~·~·= ;., rt~"'·, 'r. ~j!l " : .. ""'., ~· • ~1..11" ''" ;;1'"'· ~ r,'! 

. .. :r. ..... . . :.:.(.;-;1)' ";' •• ~ :.!" v• • ·..C~~~1"\~ ,. ••"••"'-'· / .. ~if}"';~~ 1 

~ .. ~..--;A~,_, .• ,; _.~.,... ... ·- ·~\f ~,.;.;.~o.R: l-.......... ~ \ ·.lt't··-:r·-; ~~-, .... t,:: - ....,... ~ --:··~~~1' :~• ';sfF•- ·~~- 1 •• ..,.1."J 

F~ Locatfoll: Bib OWn Bag house Stack" I' 'ttl - ~ ,.,,) ,, ltrtt .-r~~r.... i...<:;tt-!1~ .... ~ .. rl ..-.Jrl' ~~~ .. •• 

_)., ......... .Hut •· .... ~.t., ·· • ~·_,.,. .. ~~·t-it:&~ .-tr 4: - · _ _ -N.,~ 

Saii!PI&d!WIPrtnt-and s~'NJ: ~epostTa~ndf!).: D..N.or;mal (®business days) D 5 business days D other: . ·~~· .... · 'U"'~' v ; ..... "51" :;:[ • .r-.. ~: J ~·~ ' ... JtttlrStan Moye~~~ AneiJtloaLDeadllne OJ' dav · , .. . D 7-2 hrs. D2'4hrs. \:'\ ·~.::._ 

D other: \'~ 

.:;' 

Wort Requntld by: ~n Mgy~ P1Joilf 42S:a70-n42 ax:360-f34 ja-Mat. smoye@goldenspecialty.com ~~''<'' "1'··-v• --_4-~ 

-.M·.:a.L!~.,~''S". (!:Jt:~ .. < 

•· r 

SuiJmii.Riportto:·Stan 'Moye Phone: 

"T 

• 

~ ~ 0 :t"' c ~ D 1:$1 0 

.. ... i 

l.allo..&r, 0 

(.) 

~!!~ 

iBt 

j 

i 

0 

ax: 

Container Type 

.Canlsler"( ~ 

T edlar Bag ( T ) 

i" VQ!... 

(mi.,) 

~ Or 

~B: 

• .,-_---- f- .. ....,_ '\._ __. 

·- ~.o1~~'\~~-~1.1· ~- ·-~£Z_·• .~.:.. u::'"''• •,:,_ ~,-,...__,,--;. ~ 

... ~·" o'\1,_ ''"""' ,;-H'' '1:!., 

:itl -.aou~ l)~f I I I I IARIIpJ!I i j I "• ;"T" ··~ 

. i 114") 3: 

1'-.... I""T .' ,... • -... ~ &l ,,.. .; EPA 'Iii 111 

. lld1o :z: ~ 

. ..,__,_, dor ~ 

~ I W" .- . ~ . .~ ~-

{. 

::~ . Ji 

~.l ~'"-~ • ··-

Comments: 

Include Run and Sample 

Fraction, visual 

observance 

(I.e. Run 1-tmplnger t, 

murky) 

~m 

q ID 

tsJC:. 

Olher~~} 

T~ 

Weight 

~ 

_Q_~-k_~_S) \~~ lo-~~~ 

N."" ~lAS) 

\\., 44h. 

Amb 

TIIIIP 

'F 

P~t~~. 

Start 

I 

Stop l{ln Hg) 

v 

v 

I ~ Rule fh .,. ·

11 

··'· l I 

I 

)< 

IAddltloMI Analytlls) 

~J6' F';l~¢ 

..-.Jt-:;" F14 . I~CE..,.., 

[.&.· vso~. 

ool 

oo2. 

lg~~· 

~~~~ 

.ZL&e:! J:t I 

lh~~ j,\ I 

Q. W!J.lf'l 

~wvl!2 

IS2wv tlz 

1 .))loo 

II· "'8~ ~n-z.l\-1\ I tQ~i 

,., ..... ~,~ 

fllo_f-'_e 

NWI c;,,.,.s. ru#\<~. 

N,.. Gt,.,s..S _l)oH·\9... 

liS't 

~h-O\Oj a C..-IJI-It ~J'l., IPe.f.,..·. ';>t+. 1.•5.., N.!No (,JII5S 

II~Ot"l I \.,·~·" )a.) Ro U\Q.. l'ltS'\ -~'~ 1\1·0 l'i 1.. !c.. L~ •1•DUJ Do~l-

~~ ~~ 1\•C) 

IV 14-j._ II ·O I 

Relinquished by ~natun~): 

/6/~~ 

15 ... h 

5_1dob 

~lO_...b 

lloo ... b 

~.3-;'i~ 

lloo,..b 

[£6..-ts 

~~f)~ 

v 

v 

v 

L_ 

v 

L_ 

~ 

/ 

Rellnquilhed by (slgnatun~): 

Relinquished by (1tgnl(i111): 1 Date: 1 Time: 1 Reefed VJ tlgnature): I Relinquilhed by (signature): 

~ 

i'l 

GSL ~mple PlCK·UP (CIRcle 6..rae~~Yes I by Pnljectll~: 

Print-Name ~· 

Form IIGSINC-DR1001-001. REV 2010.{)1 

)( 

-

}C 

-.-

X 

~ .A 

X 

~ )( 

Date: Time: 

Daw: Time: 

.,..~,;- ~=:~. IM~.._~,..,,...,r 

~~lo.-iJq ,..oo3 

l"' 'iiS 13;1+ in' 

k!._;.....,s~ -oo&.l 

I~ 31 :r D II. ,...c61-PV, I or» 

v ...wE!A.,./e.....c c.J./-Jtif' 

,,.3,,. F·l~ tllCtD 

•••11; P:H oh: . .l!+twol. l{:~<il- 001 

,... ~.-r ""'l~"y\e...o L 

C.\o.\o..,.,.A._ ..,a 

•;)t 

~~Jiet:te.O •. to .. · -c:Ho 

Recellr by(slgnature): 

Received by (slgnatun~): 

Canister Rental (Circle One): Yes I ~ 

00 

t1l 

a 

co 

0 
... 

... 

~ 

... 

... 

~)~ 65l_ ll06J(p(p (2ov= 2) Chain of Custody 

Rrojact NW11.Al.IIITfA·y; '~~lllrift'l\tliame Afdo~41n111co WOrb iSJ*Iatlnlt(UGtlonl: 1t~ ·"'' r:rs ..... ~ ·' ~ ~~ P.'" .s.s J::;. rA ~ . -~~~ • '1foa.l - ·t!.-.. . ~. ~ 

~ ·-. ';~ 1':. ,, 

·~ ./ 

~~~t'~kt~ ~~~::-~k . _).i'',- .· ....,...__....;"\,. 

~ ,_ 

--~ ~~It Tiiinlround'Time: o·N§'nfiaii(W business days) 0·5 buslnts$ days DOther: 

S~; ~~__A .JL ~~IDtadllne 07day onhrs. 0 24hr&. 0 Other: ... t ....... "!"~ . .PfoftRequesteli ~n- Phone' 425>6~mi Fat:360-7J4.0074 ~·· smoye@goldenspecialty.com - - Submit Rtpo)1 to: s&fn'foye Phone: ax: ~: ~· 

~ ,, . ' - .. ' 

(lt ~~'-ll<;"u~<> f,.:j~ 

.,. ~ . Soun:elJIIG Anllyslll ••. CD . "' - ., . 'S I "' VoL ·• 

~ Comments: 3:: 

~ iif' 'r k-' ~ .0 i= (ml.) .. Include Run and Sample ' :".1-?f' c Container Type ,. ..... :I: . 

c , ! .. G Fracllon, visual . o · 1---SJr- "'\., App • ~'i 'I ,;:; :1 Press. ollsemnce 

~' it '¥ Start EPA I :I: ~ (I.e. Run 1 -·lmplnger 1, c..,Jster ( c ) llltho .., .. 

8 8 TedJUIBag (T) Tif!, Amb I dor ;t ~;.zr~ murky) 

FJeld~, =~ = Temp ::} Rule ~ w 

other(O) "F (Additional Anaiytal) 

0'/t$' 

.f'~: \);~-k v )( ...... ,,, ~l .. w•> u-oR5 C...•3o·tt le9..t.? ··l'>'"lC. t==:th ... 

ovl$ fo(Wt Qllf<i}' '1' "''> 4/IM v X 

1'>\JIS f:'H- .4CA>+.....-. 

R.u-v~J 11- otcu. I C..·lo.l·" ~q1.1 &#ffJ '" ~ . ·7"'' J!!'t.l't' ~ 

~u..v~J 11-olctU. C6-~·11 (}4/15 N"'1 ~/IWJ 

D'iU.ct f.C.n~e.. I 5o ... ., v )< lJ'1 ~~s-PH ,.~'f~ 10 

c /(11Al./tl -

Q V.,N .ij} I L -'Jo-11 

~I$ ~JJ:v 471.., v IX ~3ri" G~. 1- H-olqS ...,C)1J) '01: ~t:..V.)@.. 

Y(_w.,.. Jtj CJW$ 1/M-1 G.lf: !&.iO~>t~ / X .. ,3151J.;.1. AC*.t~v<l41. "-() ~~~ &~-.L. -J' .. 91lli ..... ., \e. !_ .......... ,-,<1!"'4!- 4.'1U3.'- -

~\c! Bk~ II •r:ndO lido-- 1\ tooo 

l'f""c&""'Jo> 

Oo~e. Loc>~h / c .... ,,.JJt.IA.. ..J:. ~~~ 

~ J~oii/Jiwt. ,, _,zo 1 lt:; -J·-·· I OIJ.J H'"~S> r:J. e.. ~1"1> v F,-erv 1$f~~: ~#/4.y/&<-# c. ;~-

/ 

v ~Ul 12' 1 AM10:01 

/) /IJ / R~re): Date Tbne Rec71J; !~nature): Rennquistled by (signature): Date: Time: Received by(signature): 

7-'7-tl J(.od .......... 

lfelincfuished by (llglllture): Date: Time: Rect'fd bj '1 gnature): Relinquished by (signature): Date: Time: Received by (signature): 

!Gst ProjecU:: ..... $a\ple'PJeK~UP'(Circle "ne)· Yes /~ , . (' 

( Canister Rental (Circle One): Yes I ~ " Print Name. 

Form IIGSINC-DR1 001.001, REV 2010.01 

" 

~ 

\3 

~ 

.r 

1(, 

\7 

00 

0> 

a 

(C) 

0 
In the emails below you will find the filter pre and post weights. 

Let me know if you have any questions. 

Trish 

From: Licata, Erin N (Manpower) 

Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:42AM 

To: Bilskis, Patricia A. 

Subject: RE: Filter weights for Bake oven scrubber (BOS) TF results 

Pre-Weights 

A: 0.25958 

0.25962 0.25961 

B: 0.26102 

0.26104 

0.26105 
A: 0.26006 

8:0.26119 

C: 0.25045 (note: final weight is less than initial weight likely because filter was received ripped and a 

significant portion of filter was missing) 

Let me know if you have any questions! 

Thanks, 

Erin 

From: Bilskis, Patricia A. 

Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:31AM 

To: Licata, Erin N (Manpower) 

Subject: Filter weights for Bake oven scrubber (BOS) TF results 

ErinCan you please forward me the pre and post filter weights for the 4075Atftests that you processed. 

These are the tests that you weighed out filters for the outside contractors. 

2 
~ /3o} tl 13os R WI'\-.. ( l "o. \ ~ N""o-1-lt 400 .5'_% o.?J~ ~ l3o} II BoS ~'""' P~kMt~ d{)O sv~J D. 11 

<9\3oj\l $OS ~\M'\ ~'2. \\(-\.,f) \\ 3tS 5""Y~ {,03 

t:, 13o(ll ~os RWA .. '2. . Pll..ld1''-~· -zoo soj, ~o,ofp ~ \ 30} II .Bos e.~ ::tf-3 '' :t:"rro 1 u.tt;~,." Lf~7 ~1-w /.~ 

b j3o r II ...BOS R.Wf\~ 3 P~t c.v..~At 'U1o SO/r <-o, o& 

Run Date 

7/ I 'I /11 j + 7/z,'l/11 

Technician ~ 

7/~';tw 
7/s)JI ~ PdcaJJ ~ -..9>)3 ~D I Ocf, I 

7{5jl) I sri P~Wt "UJr) .Sf))3 ·(, s'f 

-

I 

I 

I 

i 

Run Date 1/tl /.1 f 

Technician ~ 

1[,_~/o 

~