alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                      <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         5,386
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 56,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,108
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       207,726<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                56,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               541,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      222,094
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         243
<OTHER-SE>                                   244,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 541,496
<SALES>                                       96,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              96,625
<CGS>                                          3,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               11,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,577
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,449
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .27<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .26

<FN>
<F1> The Company does not present a classified balance sheet; therefore, current
     assets and current liabilities are not reflected in the Company's financial
     statement.

<F2> PP&E does not include  seismic data bank assets with a cost of $610,853,000
     and related accumulated amortization of $287,528,000.

<F3> Reflects basic earnings per share.

</FN>


</TABLE>
Mark Allen GERALDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC17-1765

Supreme Court of Florida.

[February 28, 2018]

Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida, for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Hopkins, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Mark Allen Geralds' appeal of the circuit court's order denying Geralds' motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. *See* art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Geralds' motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in *Hurst v. Florida* , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and our decision on remand in *Hurst v. State* (*Hurst* ), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198 L.Ed.2d 246 (2017). After this Court decided *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla.), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), Geralds responded to this Court's order to show cause arguing why *Hitchcock* should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Geralds' response to the order to show cause, as well as the State's arguments in reply, we conclude that Geralds is not entitled to relief. Geralds was sentenced to death following a jury's unanimous recommendation for death. *Geralds v. State* , 674 So.2d 96, 98 (Fla. 1996). Geralds' sentence of death became final in 1996. *Geralds v. Florida* , 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. 230, 136 L.Ed.2d 161 (1996). Thus, *Hurst* does not apply retroactively to Geralds' sentence of death. *See**Hitchcock* , 226 So.3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Geralds' motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Geralds, we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.

PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court's opinion in *Hitchcock v. State* , 226 So.3d 216 (Fla. 2017), *cert. denied* , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 513, 199 L.Ed.2d 396 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in *Hitchcock* .
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2491 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Copper Phthalocyanine Green 

7, Crude. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Copper 

Phthalocyanine Green 7, Crude. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COPPER PHTHALOCYANINE GREEN 7, CRUDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.20 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Copper Phthalocyanine Green 7, Crude) is amended by 

7 striking the date in the effective period column and insert8 ing ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2491 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 13 September 2004         

appointing a new member of the Commission of the European Communities

(2004/652/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 128 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Louis MICHEL is hereby appointed a member of the Commission for the period from 13 September 2004 to 31 October 2004.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 13 September 2004.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 September 2004.

For the Council

The President

B. R. BOT            

----
# Official Journal L 345/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.345.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 345 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5515 December 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.345.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 345

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5515 December 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/757/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 14 November 2012 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem of the rail system in the European Union and amending Decision 2007/756/EC
  (notified under document C(2012) 8075)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2012/757/EU

*

Commission Decision of 14 November 2012 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem of the rail system in the European Union and amending Decision 2007/756/EC
  (notified under document C(2012) 8075)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 8075)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Matthew J. SHORTT, Individually and as Trustee of the Harry and Marilynne Revocable Family Trust, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION ("FANNIE MAE"), a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the United States of America, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3096

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed November 14, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
|                                       |                 | EXHIBIT 99(a)
|-------------------------------------- | --------------- | -------------
|HSBC Finance Corporation               |                 |              
|Household Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-HC1 |                 |              
|                                       |                 |              
|                                       |                 |              
|Original Principal                     |                 |              
|Class A                                | $524,431,000.00 |              
|Class M                                | $147,143,000.00 |              
|                                       |                 |              
|Number of Bonds (000's)                |                 |              
|Class A                                | 524,431         |              
|Class M                                | 147,143         |              
|                                       |                 |              
|                                       |                 |              
|                                       |                 | 2004 Totals  
|                                       |                 |              
|CLASS A                                |                 |              
|Class A Principal Payment              |                 | 88,695,070.52
|Class A Interest Payment               |                 | 3,465,291.76 
|                                       |                 |              
|                                       |                 |              
|CLASS M                                |                 |              
|Class M Principal Payment              |                 | 24,885,750.00
|Class M Interest Payment               |                 | 1,037,877.06
EXHIBIT 32.2   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 26, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John F. McGrath, Jr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. February 03, 2009  /s/ JOHN F. MCGRATH, JR.John F. McGrath, Jr. 
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01200]



[[Page 3399]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Chapter 1

[Docket No. FAR 2018-0001, Sequence No. 1]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 
2005-97; Small Entity Compliance Guide

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of DOD, GSA, 
and NASA. This Small Entity Compliance Guide has been prepared in 
accordance with section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory 
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. It consists of a summary of the rule 
appearing in Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-97, which amends 
the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). An asterisk (*) next to a 
rule indicates that a regulatory flexibility analysis has been 
prepared. Interested parties may obtain further information regarding 
this rule by referring to FAC 2005-97, which precedes this document. 
These documents are also available via the internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

DATES: January 24, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cecelia Davis at 202-219-0202 for 
clarification of content. For information pertaining to status or 
publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat Division at 
202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-97, FAR Case 2018-001.

                       Rule Listed in FAC 2005-97
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Subject                  FAR case          Analyst
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trade Agreements Thresholds...........   2018-001   Davis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summary for the FAR rule follows. For the 
actual revisions and/or amendments made by this FAR case, refer to the 
specific item number and subject set forth in the document following 
this item summary. FAC 2005-97 amends the FAR as follows:

Trade Agreements Thresholds (FAR Case 2018-001)

    This final rule amends the Federal Acquisition Regulation to adjust 
the thresholds for application of the World Trade Organization 
Government Procurement Agreement and the Free Trade Agreements as 
determined by the United States Trade Representative, according to 
predetermined formulae under the agreements.

    Dated: January 18, 2018.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-01200 Filed 1-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
Exhibit 32.2
 BLUELINX HOLDINGS INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/  H. Douglas GoforthH. Douglas GoforthSenior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnetek, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Andrew G. Galef, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                |                                                          |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | /s/  Andrew G. Galef                                     |   |
|                | Andrew G. Galef                                               |
|                | Chairman of the Board, President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                |                                                          |
| Dated: May 14, 2004 |                                                          |

 

----
Exhibit
31.1  Section 302 CEO Certification




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Donald A. Gilles, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, of Valley Commerce Bancorp;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2006 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      April 7, 2008/s/Donald
      A. GillesDonald
      A. GillesPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Antonio LEON-JASSO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-50009.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2003.*

Decided May 6, 2004.

*129Patrick K O’Toole, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew C. Winter, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER,** District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

ORDER ***

In accordance with the holding of this court in *United States v. Navarro-Vargas,*367 F.3d 896 the judgment in the above-titled appeal is affirmed. Judge Kozinski dissents for the reasons articulated in his dissent in *United States v. Navarro-Vargas,*367 F.3d 896.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Daniel Dror, Chairman of
International American Technologies, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the following
certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with
respect to the following of this report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above annual
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and information contained in the above annual report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of International American Technologies, Inc. and results
of its operations.

Date: April 4, 2007
Daniel Dror
Chairman/s/ Daniel Dror
Jonathan LABRADA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1221

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1507/2005

of 16 September 2005         

fixing the minimum selling price for butter for the 26th individual invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10(c) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 26th individual invitation to tender pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 13 September 2005, the minimum selling price for butter is fixed at 260,10 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2250/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 25).

----