alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE EX REL. Clarence WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2018-KH-0159

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. CHARLES**

PER CURIAM:

*1183WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.

Relator has now exhausted the right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator has filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court, and the district court's ruling denying relief is now final. Hereafter, unless relator can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted the right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Page 1 of 1

EPA’s Planned Proposed Rulemaking to Address the Pr ocess for Tribes to Obtain
Treatment in a Similar Manner as States for the Cle an Water Act Impaired Water Listing and Total Maximum Daily Load Program – Meeting with Intergovernmental Associations Wednesday, October 1, 2014 2:00 – 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Meeting Summary EPA Presenters: Mark Rupp – EPA, Office of Congres sional and Intergovernmental Relations Sarah Furtak, EPA Office of Wetland s, Oceans and Watersheds

Participants: Susan Kirsch, Association of C lean Water Administrators (ACWA)

Alexandra Dunn, Environmental Council of States (ECOS) Melanie Condon, National Council of State Legis latures (NCSL) Chris Scolari, Western Governors’ Association ( WGA) Nathan Bracken, Western States Water Council (W SWC)

The meeting began with introductions, followed by a n opening statement by Mark Rupp. Sarah Furtak then gave a presentation, “EPA’s Planned Pro posed Rulemaking to Address the Process
for Tribes to Obtain Treatment in a Similar Manner as States for the Clean Water Act Impaired Water Listing and Total Maximum Daily Load Program, ” available within docket EPA-HQOW-2014-0622.

The meeting continued with an opportunity for quest ions and comments from participants.

The following is a list of questions and comments r eceived from participants during the meeting. For each of the questions, the EPA presenters provi ded responses that were consistent with the presentation materials and other information availa ble at http://www.epa.gov/tmdl/tribalconsultation-rulemaking-provide-more-opportunities- tribes-engage-clean-water-act . Views and comments were acknowledged, and will be considered by EPA in developing the proposed rule.

• What was the nature of comments received from tribe s during the pre-proposal tribal
consultation and coordination?

• Where is the list of tribes having treatment in a s imilar manner as states (TAS) for the Clean Water Act Section 303(c) Water Quality Standa rds Program (as those tribes may be the most likely to apply for TAS for 303(d))?

• ECOS and ACWA supported EPA’s plans for further out reach and coordination with intergovernmental associations once the rule is pro posed.
Order filed March 13, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00850-CV

____________

IN RE RICHARD PARKER, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-13073

ORDER

On October 22, 2014, relator Richard Parker filed a petition for writ of 

habeas corpus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see 

also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this Court to order his 

release from an allegedly void confinement in the Harris County Jail for contempt 

based on an order issued by the 247th District Court of Harris County. On 

October 30, 2014, this Court granted relator temporary relief by issuing an interim 

writ of habeas corpus and ordering relator released from confinement upon the 
2

posting of a bond, pending this Court’s consideration of his petition. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 52.8(b)(3), 52.10. On January 22, 2015, this Court abated this original 

proceeding pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b) due to the 

resignation of the trial court judge who issued the challenged orders.

In the abatement order, we directed relator to advise this Court of the status 

of the underlying litigation every thirty days from the date of the order until the 

respondent’s successor has informed this Court of the action taken upon 

reconsideration of the challenged order. Relator’s first status update was due on 

February 23, 2015. However, relator has not filed a status update with this Court, 

nor has this Court been informed of any action by respondent’s successor on the 

challenged order.

Accordingly, we ORDER relator to file a letter with this Court within 

10 days of the date of this order explaining: (1) the current status of the underlying 

litigation; (2) whether the trial court has taken any action on the orders challenged 

in this original proceeding; and (3) whether relator presently intends to still seek 

relief by writ of habeas corpus with respect to the challenged order. If relator fails 

to file the letter required by this order, this Court will consider dismissal of this 

original proceeding on its own motion for want of prosecution.

This Court will consider an appropriate motion filed by either party to 

reinstate or dismiss this original proceeding, as appropriate.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Donovan.
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”) by Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Charles G.
Bridge, Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify
that:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
      Registrant.
 
  Dated:
      February 17, 2008
              /s/
      Charles G. BridgeCharles
      G. BridgePrincipal
      Accounting Officer
# Official Journal L 42/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 42 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5817 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 42

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5817 February 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/208 of 8 December 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle functional safety requirements for the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/208 of 8 December 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle functional safety requirements for the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Magnetek, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending December 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, PeterM. McCormick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and MartyJ. Schwenner, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   |                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/  Peter M.  McCormick               |
|   | Peter M. McCormick                          |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer      |
|   |                                        |
|   |                                        |
|   | /s/  Marty J.  Schwenner               |
|   | Marty J. Schwenner                          |
|   | Vice-President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

Dated: February 6,2009

 

----
Motion Granted, Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed April 14, 

2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00803-CR

ALEXIS JUNE STAPLETON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 27034A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Alexis June Stapleton has signed and filed a written motion to 

withdraw his/her notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has 

not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
J

~ ` ~ ED STq T

~ S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY $ 

### ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 z z 3 

### ~ ~o PROS

~ G

~ C 

## JUL 1 5 2"M
Mr. J. R. Stroble Manager, National TRU Program U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221-3090 Dear Mr. Stroble: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION



### On September 30, 2013 the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO), requested as a Tier 1(T1) change, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's approval, to add additional containers (also referred to as Lot 5C) to a previously approved remote-handled (RH) waste stream (ID-HFEF-S5400-RH). With this letter EPA approves the requested Tier 1(T1) change to add Lot 5C waste to the approved RH waste stream. We base our approval on the evaluation elements discussed in the enclosed report (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; II-A4-185). If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. Sincerely,
Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Enclosure cc: Electronic Distribution Joe Franco, CBFO Court Fesmire, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO Tom Morgan, CBFO Mike Brown, CBFO QA Site Documents

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov

Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16835-16836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural 
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. 
L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the 
question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the 
purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, 
are being manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations 
and be postmarked on or before May 4, 2009. Address written comments to 
Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined between 
8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 
3720.
Docket Number: 09-008. Applicant: National Institute of Standards and 
Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Instrument: 
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. 
Intended Use: The instrument will be used to study the compositional 
characterization of complex, compositionally heterogeneous materials at 
the sub-nanometer scale. This includes materials such as advanced on-
chip interconnects, semiconductor nanowires and thin film and other 
nano-structured materials. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No 
instruments of the same general category as the foreign instrument 
begin manufactured in the United States. Application accepted by 
Commissioner of Customs: March 17, 2009.


[[Page 16836]]


    Dated: April 6, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
[FR Doc. E9-8396 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-S
* The Honorable Robert H. Cleland, United States Distri ct Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. File Name: 05a0500n.06 Filed: June 13, 2005 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION No. 04-5734 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

TYRONE TIMOTHY WOOTEN, Executor of the Estate of Elizabeth Ann Clark Wooten, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. HEALTHSOUTH/METHODIST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, L.P., d/b/a HEALTHSOUTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF MEMPHIS, Defendant-Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

OPINION

Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge, GILMAN, Circuit Judge, and CLELAND, District Judge. *
RONALD LEE GILMAN , Circuit Judge. In May of 2002, Elizabeth Ann Clark Wooten sustained an intracerebral hemorrhage. For the following month and a half, she received inpatient rehabilitation therapy at HealthSouth/Methodist Rehabilitation Hospital (HealthSouth). She began outpatient therapy when she left the hospital. The incident at issue occurred during an outpatient therapy session in September of 2002, when Wooten, who was momentarily unattended, toppledNo. 04-5734 Wooten v. HealthSouth

- 2 - -- over onto the floor while sitting on a rehabilitation mat. According to her son, she sustained injuries that led to her death three days later. The son, Tyrone Timothy Wooten, brought a wr ongful death action in April of 2003, alleging that HealthSouth was negligent in allowing his mother to topple over. Health South asserted that this was a medical malpractice suit, requiring expert testimony to establish the applicable standard of care and to opine on whether H ealthSouth had complie d with that standard. Tyrone Wooten tendered no expert witnesses withinthe deadline established by the district court’s scheduling order, contending instead that his suit was an ordinary negligence claim based upon the “common knowledge exception.” The district court disagr eed and, after denying a motion by Tyrone Wooten for an extension of time to disclose his expert witnesses, granted summary judgment to HealthSouth. This timely appeal followed. After carefully considering the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we conclude that the district court did not err in granti ng summary judgment to HealthSouth. Because the reasoning that supports the judgment has been clearly articulated by the district court in a thorough and comprehensive nine-page decision, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by us would be unduly duplicative. Accordingly, th e judgment rendered by the Honorable Samuel H. Mays, United States District Court Judge for th e Western District of Tennessee at Memphis, is
AFFIRMED on the basis of the reasoning detailed in his Order dated May 20, 2004.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000751256
<NAME>                              DYCO OIL AND GAS 1985-2 PROGRAM

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    54,135
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             32,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          86,847
<PP&E>                                22,427,548
<DEPRECIATION>                        22,400,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           130,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,160
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               124,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             130,266
<SALES>                                  138,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         195,721
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             60,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          134,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      134,826
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             134,826
<EPS-BASIC>                                30.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
William GRAVES, III, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and State of Florida, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-1960

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


       Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 10, 2004                               /s/ Larry F Vance
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Larry F Vance
                                                       Chairman of the Board and
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,558]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 11, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by the United Steelworkers, Amalgamated Local 9443 Unit 06 on behalf of workers of Hon Company—HNI, Owensboro, Kentucky.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of March 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9-8298 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document

Exhibit 10(e)(iv)
SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
SCHEDULE OF OFFICER AGREEMENTS
 
Pursuant to Rule 12b-31, the following sets forth the material details which differ in the Officer Change in Control Agreements, the form of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 10(e)(iii).
 															
	Name	Capacities in Which Served	Effective
 Date
 of
Agreement
	Severance
Multiple of
Base Salary
and Average
Annual Bonus
	Duration of Continued Medical
Insurance

	  	  	  	  	  
	Michael J. Renna	Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, South Jersey Industries, Inc.	1/1/20	3X	3 years
					
	Steven R. Cocchi	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, South Jersey Industries, Inc.	1/1/20	2X	2 years
					
	Melissa J. Orsen	Senior Vice President, South Jersey Industries, Inc. and President, SJIU	1/1/20	2X	2 years
					
	Eric Stein	Senior Vice President and General Counsel	2/18/22	2X	2 years
					
	Leonard Brinson, Jr.	Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer	2/18/22	2X	2 years
					
	Karen Phillips	Senior Vice President, Human Resources	2/18/22	2X	2 years