Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 14, 2009 / Notices 17219 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–63,880, et al.] 

Cequent Electrical Products, Inc. 

Formerly Known as Tekonsha Towing, 

Currently Known as Cequent 

Performance Products, Tekonsha, MI; 

Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Including Employees in Support of 

Cequent Electrical Products, Inc., Formerly 

Known as Tekonsha Towing, Currently 

Known as Cequent Performance Products, 

Tekonsha, Michigan Working in the 

Following Locations: 

[TA–W–63,880A], Washougal, Washington 

[TA–W–63,880B], West Linn, Oregon 

[TA–W–63,880C], Temecula, California 

[TA–W–63,880D], Urbandale, Iowa 

[TA–W–63,880E], Weston, Wisconsin 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on November 26, 2008, 

applicable to workers of Cequent 

Electrical Products, Inc., Tekonsha, 

Michigan. The notice was published in 

the Federal Register on December 10, 

2008 (73 FR 75137). The certification 

was amended on December 24, 2008 to 

include employees in support of the 

subject firm working in Washougal, 

Washington, West Linn, Oregon, 

Temecula, California, Urbandale, Iowa 

and Weston, Wisconsin. The notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

January 2, 2009 (74 FR 465–466). The 

certification was again amended on 

February 18, 2009 to show that the 

subject firm was formerly known as 

Tekonsha Towing. The notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

March 3, 2009 (74 FR 9285). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in the production 

of brake controls, breakaway kits and 

lights for the automotive and trailer 

industries. 

New information also shows that 

following a corporate decision, Cequent 

Electrical Products, Inc. is currently 

known as Cequent Performance 

Products as of January 1, 2009. 

Accordingly, the Department is 

amending this certification to show that 

Cequent Electrical Products, Inc. is 

currently known as Cequent 

Performance Products. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

the subject firm who were adversely 

affected by increased imports of brake 

controls, breakaway knits and lights. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–63,880, TA–W–63,880A, TA–W– 

63,880B, TA–W–63,880C, TA–W– 

63,880D and TA–W–63,880E are hereby 

issued as follows: 

All workers of Cequent Electrical Products, 

Inc., formerly known as Tekonsha Towing, 

currently known as Cequent Performance 

Products, Tekonsha, Michigan, including 

employees in support of Cequent Electrical 

Products, Inc., formerly known as Tekonsha 

Towing, currently known as Cequent 

Performance Products, Tekonsha, Michigan 

working out of Washougal, Washington (TA– 

W–63,880A), West Linn, Oregon (TA–W– 

63,880B), Temecula, California (TA–W– 

63,880C), Urbandale, Iowa (TA–W–63,880D), 

and Weston, Wisconsin (TA–W–63,880E), 

who became totally or partially separated 

from employment on or after August 6, 2007, 

through November 26, 2010, are eligible to 

apply for adjustment assistance under 

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are 

also eligible to apply for alternative trade 

adjustment assistance under Section 246 of 

the Trade Act of 1974. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

April 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–8409 Filed 4–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–65,019] 

Delphi Corporation Corporate 

Headquarters and Product & Service 

Solutions Division Including On-Site 

Leased Workers From Aerotek, 

Bartech and Securitas Security, Troy, 

MI; Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on January 30, 2009, 

applicable to workers of Delphi 

Corporation, Corporate Headquarters 

and Product & Service Solutions 

Division, Troy, Michigan. The notice 

was published in the Federal Register 

on February 23, 2009 (74 FR 8115). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers perform administrative and 

support functions for prototype 

automotive parts. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

the subject firm adversely affected by 

the shift in production of prototype 

automotive parts the Mexico. 

New information shows that workers 

leased from Aerotek, Bartech and 

Securitas Security were employed onsite at the Troy, Michigan location of 

Delphi Corporation, Corporate 

Headquarters and Product & Service 

Solutions Division. The Department has 

determined that these workers were 

sufficiently under the control of the 

subject firm to be considered leased 

workers. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include workers leased 

from Aerotek, Bartech and Securitas 

Security working on-site at the Troy, 

Michigan location of the subject firm. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–65,019 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Delphi Corporation, 

Corporate Headquarters and Product & 

Service Solutions Division, including on-site 

leased workers from Aerotek, Bartech and 

Securitas Security, Troy, Michigan, who 

became totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after January 27, 2008, 

through January 30, 2011, are eligible to 

apply for adjustment assistance under 

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are 

also eligible to apply for alternative trade 

adjustment assistance under Section 246 of 

the Trade Act of 1974. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

April 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–8407 Filed 4–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

17220 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 14, 2009 / Notices 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of March 30 through April 3, 

2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. The sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied for 

the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) A loss or business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations For Worker 

Adjustment Assistance And Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,245; Pacific Veneer, Ilevel 

Division, A Subsidiary of 

Weyerhaeuser, Aberdeen, WA: 

February 9, 2008 

TA–W–65,272; The Timken Company, 

Cairo, GA: February 12, 2008 

TA–W–65,314; Kennametal, Inc., 

Greenfield TAP Plant, MSSG 

Division, Greenfield, MA: January 

26, 2008 

TA–W–65,393; Pieco, Inc. dba Superior 

Trim, Findlay, OH: February 13, 

2008 

TA–W–65,655; Weyerhaeuser Company, 

Weyerhaeuser NR Company, Level 

Division, Chavies, KY: March 19, 

2008 

TA–W–65,310; Micro Tool and 

Manufacturing, Inc., Meadville, PA: 

February 18, 2008 

TA–W–65,382; Bahari Group Limited, 

New York, NY: February 17, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–64,499A; Whirlpool Corporation, 

St. Joseph, MI: November 3, 2007 

TA–W–64,499; Whirlpool Corporation, 

Benton Harbor, MI: November 3, 

2007 

TA–W–65,001; Brunswick Corporation, 

U.S. Marine Division, Navassa, NC: 

January 27, 2008 

TA–W–65,230; Vishay Vitramon, Inc., 

Monroe, CT: March 20, 2009 

TA–W–65,236; Hanesbrands, Inc., OnSite Worker from Kelly Service 

Temps, Barnwell, SC: February 9, 

2008 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 14, 2009 / Notices 17221 

TA–W–65,327; Mississippi Packaging, 

LLC, d/b/a Shamrock Specialty, 

Speecer Reed Group, El Paso, TX: 

February 20, 2008 

TA–W–65,330; KX Technology, LLC, A 

Subsidiary of Marmon Waters, West 

Haven, CT: February 20, 2008 

TA–W–65,363; Nobel Automotive 

Tennessee, LLC, Orhan North 

America, Formerly Dana Corp, 

Paris, TN: February 23, 2008 

TA–W–65,414; Toyoda Gosei 

Automotive Sealing Kentucky, LLC, 

Toyoda Gosei North America 

Division, Hopkinsville, KY: 

February 2, 2008 

TA–W–65,271; ACS Cumberland 

Engineering, South Attleboro, MA: 

January 27, 2008 

TA–W–65,309; ITW Paslode, Terrell, TX: 

February 18, 2008 

TA–W–65,371; Finisar Corporation, 

Formerly Optium Corp., Horsham, 

PA: February 19, 2008 

TA–W–65,381; JV China Ting, LLC, New 

York, NY: February 24, 2008 

TA–W–65,415A; Champion 

Laboratories, Inc., A Subsidiary of 

United Components, West Salem, 

IL: February 26, 2008 

TA–W–65,415; Champion Laboratories, 

Inc., A Subsidiary of United 

Components, Albion, IL: February 

26, 2008 

TA–W–65,083; HDM Furniture 

Industries, Inc., Furniture Offices 

and Design Showroom Operations, 

High Point, NC: February 2, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–65,240; St. Marys Carbon 

Company, St. Marys, PA: February 

11, 2008 

TA–W–65,279; Lenoir Mirror Company, 

Lenoir, NC: February 12, 2008 

TA–W–65,423; Metaldyne, Litchfield, 

MI: January 18, 2008 

TA–W–65,448; K and K Screw Products, 

LLC, East China, MI: February 27, 

2008 

TA–W–65,528; The Warren Company, 

Advanced Placement, Erie, PA: 

March 6, 2008 

TA–W–65,589; AZ Automotive, 

Roseville, MI: March 6, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

TA–W–64,499B; Whirlpool Corporation, 

Benton Harbor, MI. 

TA–W–65,335; Engineering Design and 

Sales, Inc., Danville, VA. 

TA–W–65,367; Kern Liebers Textile 

USA, Charlotte, NC. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–64,765; Sealing Products 

Manufacturing, LLC, Div of Dana 

Holding Corp., Danville, KY. 

TA–W–64,775; National Semiconductor, 

Interface and Hi-Rel Design, South 

Portland, ME. 

TA–W–64,963; DME Manufacturing, 

Inc., Youngwood, PA. 

TA–W–65,008; Modern Industries, Inc., 

Machining Division, Erie, PA. 

TA–W–65,094; Plastic Packaging, Inc., 

Aberdeen, NC. 

TA–W–65,224; Panel Products, LLC, 

Rogue River, OR. 

TA–W–65,261; Dunbar Enterprises, Inc., 

Snohomish, WA. 

TA–W–65,509; Moose River Lumber 

Company, Inc., Moose River, ME. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–65,241; Chase Home Finance 

LLC, A Division of JP Morgan Chase 

and Company, Lexington, KY. 

TA–W–65,288; Caliber Auto Transfer of 

Detroit, Wayne, MI. 

TA–W–65,412; Bestway Express, Inc., 

Vincennes, IN. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of March 30 through April 3, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. Department 

of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210 during normal 

business hours or will be mailed to persons 

who write to the above address. 

Dated: April 8, 2009. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance 

[FR Doc. E9–8404 Filed 4–13–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the