alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2630-2631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00742]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-403-001.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to Notice of Cancellation 
of certain designated Rate Schedules to be effective 6/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 1/10/18.
    Accession Number: 20180110-5168.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-634-000.

[[Page 2631]]

    Applicants: Access Energy Solutions, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Tariff to be effective 1/
31/2018.
    Filed Date: 1/11/18.
    Accession Number: 20180111-5081.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/1/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-635-000.
    Applicants: Sierra Pacific Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule No. 71--
CalPeco & SPPC 609 Line Termination Agr to be effective 1/12/2018.
    Filed Date: 1/11/18.
    Accession Number: 20180111-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/1/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-636-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2018-01-11_Revisions to 
update Attachment X: Appendix 1 Interconnection Request to be effective 
3/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 1/11/18.
    Accession Number: 20180111-5113.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/1/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 11, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00742 Filed 1-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 | /s/ Darlene M.Deptula-Hicks   |   |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | Darlene      M. Deptula-Hicks |
|                                 | Chief      Financial Officer  |
|                                 |                          |
| Date:  August 7,      2009 |                          |

----
EX PARTE Ricky Nelson BASS

1160055 (CR-15-1088)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 10, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Seitel, Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Robert D. Monson, President and Principal ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 
| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | The Report fully complies with  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)

The information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 13, 2008

  /s/ Robert D. Monson

Robert D. Monson

President and Principal Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement, required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and willbe furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

  |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00036-CR

Rosanna Marie MORALES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CR-8622

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 23, 2022

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that this criminal case, “is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”

Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or 

nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended 

by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,

(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or
04-22-00036-CR

- 2 -

(C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes 

the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written 

motion filed and ruled upon before trial, nor does it indicate the trial court gave its permission to

appeal. See id. Appellant has not identified with this court any statute that expressly authorizes 

the specific appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect 

that this is a plea-bargain case and appellant does not have a right to appeal.

We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of 

appeal has not been made part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). We issued an order stating 

this appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification was made part of the 

appellate record by February 24, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 

610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, 

no pet.). No such amended trial court certification has been filed.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Jose ADAME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3333

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Telesat
Canada (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michel G. Cayouette, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:







| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 22, 2012



|/s/ Michel G. Cayouette |                                              
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|Name:                   | Michel G. Cayouette                          
|Title:                  | Chief Financial Officer and
        Treasurer
October 21, 2010

Hello Ms. Boyd, attached is our submission for the ICR dated May 27, 2010. The air testing was performed on our delacquering kiln baghouse S002. We have three baghouses that provided HAP metals testing samples of which two are lime injected. The lime injected baghouses are associated with the delacquering process (S002) and the melting process (S006). They each have their own silo for lime, but the lime is supplied by the same company. Baghouse d ust is collected in a common bin, but we segregated the dust before co

- mingling to provide samples specific to each baghouse. The third baghouse is associated with our shredding process (S001). It is not a lime injected baghouse; its dust is
collected in a separate bin. I hope this narrative is helpful, please let me know if there is any further information need.



### Don Forchette Environmental Engineer Golden Aluminum, Inc. ph# 303

- 654

- 8366 cell# 303

- 718

- 8184
Angelica Casini BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Gary JUENGAIN v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-0073

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Writ not considered. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review.
Lynwood ROBERTS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2099

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 07, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,328] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 23, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of JELD-WEN Premium Woods Doors, Oshkosh, Wisconsin. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of March 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E9-7756 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2020433EN.01001002.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission

(Case C-274/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 - Actibio grant agreement - Actibio project - Seventh framework programme - Eligible costs - Conflict of interests - Burden of proof - Time sheets - Audit report - Probative value - Principle of proportionality)

(2020/C 433/10)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) (represented by: V. Christianos, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: O. Verheecke and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 30, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00113

- CV

Jerry Lavone Lively Jr. , Appellant

v.

Michelle Anne Lively , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TR IANA, AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on March 7, 2022

. Appellant has filed a

motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the Court agrees that the motion

should be granted . Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismiss es the app eal

. Because

appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 131090 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, JOHN FODERA and SABRINA FODERA, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 131090 COA: 259097 Genesee CC: 03-076302-NI KEENAN VAN LOBBS and KYLEE LYNN LOBBS, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

d0920 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION
BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Natcore Technology, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ending December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Childs,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                       
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
 of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

The
foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the
provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended
to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| | Date: April
 28, 2016          
| | By: /s/
 Richard Childs        
| | Name:
 Richard Childs          
| | Title: Chief
 Financial Officer

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 62 (Thursday, April 2, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7414]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

22 CFR Part 215

RIN 0412-AA61


Privacy Act of 1974, Implementation of Exemptions

AGENCY: United States Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document delays the effective date by 30 days for the 
final rule exempting portions of the Partner Vetting System from one or 
more provisions of the Privacy Act, as published in the Federal 
Register on January 2, 2009 and delayed on February 2, 2009.

DATES: The effective date for the final rule published on January 2, 
2009 (74 FR 9) and delayed on February 2, 2009 (74 FR 5808) is further 
delayed until May 4, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions, please contact 
Jeff Denale, Chief, Counterterrorism and Information Security Division, 
Office of Security, United States Agency for International Development, 
Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20523; or by telephone 202 712 1264.

    Dated: March 30, 2009.
Randy T. Streufert,
Director, Office of Security.
 [FR Doc. E9-7414 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Annual Report of JMG Exploration, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph W. Skeehan, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: July 24­­, 2009  /S/ Joseph W. SkeehanName:Joseph W. SkeehanTitle:Chief Executive and Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JMG Exploration, Inc.   and will be retained by JMG Exploration, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Document

    

  Exhibit 10.44
August 18, 2021


Gilles Luca 


Dear Gilles,


In recognition of your continued efforts and key role, Valaris Limited (“Valaris”) is pleased to award you a cash-based retention award in the aggregate amount of USD $1,500,000 (the “Retention Award”) subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this letter agreement (this “Agreement”).  


The Retention Award will be paid to you in three equal semi-annual installments of USD $500,000 each, less applicable taxes and withholdings, subject to your continued employment with Valaris or its subsidiaries through the applicable payment date except as otherwise provided below.  The first installment of the Retention Award will be paid to you within 30 days following February 15, 2022, with the second installment payable within 30 days following August 15, 2022, and the final installment payable within 30 days following February 15, 2023.


Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event your employment is terminated by Valaris and its subsidiaries without Cause (as defined in the Valaris Executive Severance Plan) or as a result of your death or Disability (as defined in the Valaris Executive Severance Plan), any unpaid portion of the Retention Award will accelerate in full and be paid to you in a single lump sum, less applicable taxes and withholdings, within 60 days following the date of such termination.  For the avoidance of doubt, any unpaid portion of the Retention Award will be forfeited if your employment with the Company is terminated for Cause (as defined in the Valaris Executive Severance Plan) or as a result of your resignation for any reason.


This letter agreement and the rights and obligations hereunder will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Texas without reference to any jurisdiction’s principles of conflicts of law and reflects the parties entire understanding and agreement with regard to the foregoing.


We thank you for your ongoing efforts and support and look forward to your many future contributions.  
Sincerely,
			
	



/s/ Anton Dibowitz________________________
Name:    Anton Dibowitz
Title:    Director