15750 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. The proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register 

Volume 74, Number 19, pages 5678– 

5679, on January 30, 2009, allowing for 

a 60-day public comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

an additional 30 days for public 

comment until May 7, 2009. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the pubic and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

function of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

New information collection, Civil 

Justice Survey of State Courts Trials on 

Appeal. 

(2) The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Civil Justice Survey of State Courts 

Trials on Appeal. 

(3) The Agency Form Number, if Any, 

and the Applicable Component of the 

Department Sponsoring the Collection: 

The form labels are CJSSCTA—IAC, 

CJSSCTA—COLR, and CJSSCTA—ADR, 

Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of 

Justice Programs, U.S. Department of 

Justice. 

(4) Affected Public who Will be Asked 

or Required to Respond, as Well as a 

Brief Abstract: Primary: State Appellate 

Courts. The purpose of the CJSSCTA 

project is to provide detailed statistical 

information on civil cases adjudicated at 

the appellate level in State courts. The 

project will collect information from 

court records on individual civil cases 

disposed in a sample of State 

intermediate appellate courts and courts 

of last resort. The types of information 

collected will include the types of civil 

cases appealed after trial to an 

intermediate appellate court or court of 

last resort, the impact of the appellate 

process on trial court outcomes, the 

extent that appellate claims are 

dismissed or withdrawn before being 

decided on the merits, the types of legal 

issues raised on appeal, the number of 

appeals ending in a published opinion, 

and the rate of judicial dissent at the 

appellate level. The survey will also 

collect aggregate count information on 

the number of appeals referred to and 

settled through court annexed 

alternative dispute resolution programs. 

(5) An Estimate of the Total Number 

of Respondents and the Amount of Time 

Estimated for an Average Respondent to 

Respond/Reply: It is estimated that 

information will be collected on 1,500 

civil cases concluded by trial in 2005 in 

which either the plaintiff or defendant 

filed a notice of appeal to an 

intermediate appellate court or court of 

last resort. Information will also be 

collected on the number of cases filed 

and disposed in court annexed 

alternative dispute resolution programs. 

Annual cost to the respondents is based 

on the number of hours involved in 

providing information from court 

records for the intermediate appellate 

court, court of last resort, and 

alternative dispute resolution forms. 

Public reporting burden for this 

collection of information is estimated to 

average 1.5 hours per data collection 

form for the intermediate appellate 

court and court of last resort forms and 

2 hours for the alternative dispute 

resolution forms. The estimate of hour 

burden is based on prior civil justice 

data collections and pre-tests of the 

current forms. 

(6) An Estimate of the Total Public 

Burden (in Hours) Associated with the 

Collection: The estimated public burden 

associated with this collection is 830 

hours. It is estimated that on-site data 

collection will be necessary for about 

500 of the 1,500 civil appeals. Hence, 

the estimated burden hour to complete 

each of the appellate data collection 

forms will result in a total of 750 burden 

hours to complete the CJSSCTA (500 

data collection forms multiplied by 1.5 

hours per form = 750 burden hours). In 

addition to the case level appellate data 

collection forms, it is estimated that 40 

appellate courts will have some form of 

court—annexed alternative dispute 

resolution (ADR) program. The 

estimated burden hour to complete the 

ADR spreadsheets for the participating 

appellate courts will result in a total of 

80 burden hours to complete the ADR 

portion of this project: (40 appellate 

courts with ADR programs multiplied 

by 2 hours per coding spreadsheet = 80 

burden hours). Therefore, the total 

burden hours for the CJSSCTA amounts 

to 830 burden hours (750 burden hours 

to complete the case level appellate 

forms + 80 hours to complete the ADR 

spreadsheets). 

If additional information is required 

contact: Ms. Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, 

Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: April 1, 2009. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United 

States Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E9–7821 Filed 4–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OMB Number 1121–NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-day Notice of new collection: 

Research to support the National Crime 

Victimization Survey (NCVS). 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of 

Justice Statistics will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. This proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register 

Volume 73, Number 231, page 72840 on 

December 1, 2008, allowing for a 60 day 

comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until May 7, 2009. This 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices 15751 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. Written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of this information: 

(1) Type of information collection: 

Generic clearance for methodological 

research on the National Crime 

Victimization Survey. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

National Crime Victimization Survey. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

department sponsoring the collection: 

n/a. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Persons ages 12 or 

older are eligible for participation in the 

NCVS. This generic clearance will cover 

methodological research that will use 

existing or new sampled households 

with the same ages of respondents 

currently used in the NCVS. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: Approximately 15,260 

persons ages 18 or older will participate 

in this methodological research. The 

time for each respondent to participate 

will vary based on the study 

component. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The total respondent burden 

is approximately 16,340 hours for the 

three years of this clearance. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Deputy Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, United States 

Department of Justice, Patrick Henry 

Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: April 2, 2009. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Deputy Clearance Officer, United 

States Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E9–7815 Filed 4–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–65,027; TA–W–65,027A; TA–W– 

65,027B] 

Davis-Standard LLC, Pawcatuck, CT, 

Including Off-Site Employees in 

Support of Davis-Standard LLC, 

Pawcatuck, CT, Working at Various 

Locations in Plainfield, IL and 

Westerville, OH; Amended Certification 

Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on February 9, 2009, 

applicable to workers of Davis-Standard 

LLC, Pawcatuck, Connecticut. The 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register on March 3, 2009 (74 FR 4387). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in activities related 

to the production of plastic extrusion 

machinery. 

New information shows that worker 

separations have occurred involving offsite employees in support and under the 

control of Davis-Standard LLC, 

Pawcatuck, Connecticut at various 

locations. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include Mr. Roger 

Clarke, working out of Plainfield, 

Illinois and Mr. Ronald Allbritton, 

working out of Westerville, Ohio. 

The intent of the Department’s 

certification is to include all workers of 

the subject firm who were adversely 

affected by increased imports of plastic 

extrusion machinery following the shift 

of production to China and the United 

Kingdom. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–65,027 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Davis-Standard LLC, 

Pawcatuck, Connecticut, including 

employees in support of Davis-Standard LLC, 

Pawcatuck, Connecticut at various locations 

in the following states: Plainfield, Illinois 

(TA–W–65,027A) and Westerville, Ohio (TA– 

W–65,027B), who became totally or partially 

separated from employment on or after 

January 27, 2008, through February 9, 2011, 

are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 

under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 

and are also eligible to apply for alternative 

trade adjustment assistance under Section 

246 of the Trade Act of 1974. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of 

March 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–7792 Filed 4–6–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–64,383] 

International Business Machines 

Corporation, IBM Integrated Supply 

Chain Operations, Hopewell Junction, 

NY; Notice of Negative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration 

By application dated February 21, 

2009, the petitioner requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

Department’s negative determination 

regarding eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA), applicable to 

workers and former workers of the 

subject firm. The denial notice was 

signed on January 2, 2009 and 

published in the Federal Register on 

January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4464). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the