alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0665 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-082-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act: OPIC Annual Public Hearing

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, March 8, 2018.

PLACE: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue NW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Hearing OPEN to the Public at 10 a.m.

PURPOSE: Annual Public Hearing to afford an opportunity for any person 
to present views regarding the activities of the Corporation.

PROCEDURES: Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must 
provide advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 
p.m. Thursday, February 22, 2018. The notice must include the 
individual's name, title, organization, address, email, telephone 
number, and a concise summary of the subject matter to be presented.
    Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for 
individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, 
to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request an 
opportunity to be heard.
    Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record 
must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no 
later than 5 p.m. Thursday, February 22, 2018. Such statement must be 
typewritten, double-spaced, and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.
    Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda 
for the hearing identifying speakers, setting forth the subject on 
which each participant will speak, and the time allotted for each 
presentation. The agenda will be available at the hearing.
    A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary 
will be made available, upon written request to OPIC's Corporate 
Secretary, at the cost of reproduction.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Information on the hearing may be 
obtained from Catherine F.I. Andrade at (202) 336-8768, or via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#127173667a77607b7c773c737c7660737677527d627b713c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="274446534f42554e494209464943554643426748574e4409404851">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPIC is a U.S. Government agency that 
provides, on a commercial basis, political risk insurance and financing 
in friendly developing countries and emerging democracies for 
environmentally sound projects that confer positive developmental 
benefits upon the project country while creating employment in the U.S. 
OPIC is required by section 231A(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961, as amended (the ``Act'') to hold at least one public hearing each 
year.

    Dated: January 17, 2018.
Catherine F.I. Andrade,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-01006 Filed 1-17-18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX PARTE Adrian STEWART

1160057 (CR-15-0590)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7616
CLARENCE PERRY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-1050-AM) Submitted: June 6, 2003 Decided: August 12, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Clarence Perry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court granted Perry’s motion to reopen the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6), which permits a district court to reopen the appeal period as long as the motion requesting such relief is filed within 180 days after entry of the order or seven days after “receiv[ing] notice of the entry, whichever is earlier.” Because we must examine our jurisdiction sua sponte in all cases, Snowden v. CheckPoint Check Cashing , 290 F.3d 631, 635 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 695 (2002), and it is unclear whether Perry’s motion was filed within the requisite time period, we remand. Here, the record is unclear as to when Perry received a copy of the docket sheet on which the district court entered its order denying his § 2254 petition. SeeFed. R. App. P. 4(a)(7). Receipt of the docket sheet provides adequate notice to open the seven-day window in Rule 4(a)(6). See McDaniel v. Moore , 292 F.3d 1304, 1305 06 (11th Cir.), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 493 (2002). Because we cannot determine on the record before us whether Perry received notice on September 25, 2002, or on September 30, 2002, we remand this case to the district court for the court to make a factual finding as to when Perry received notice of the denial of his3 § 2254 petition. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further review.

REMANDED
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15425 and #15426; CALIFORNIA Disaster Number CA-00283]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of the presidential declaration of a major disaster for public assistance only for the state of California (FEMA-4353-DR), dated 01/02/2018. *Incident:*
                         Wildfires. *Incident Period:*
                         12/04/2017 and continuing.
 DATES: Issued on 01/02/2018. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/05/2018. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/02/2018.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 01/02/2018, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Santa Barbara, Ventura. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 154255 and for economic injury is 154260. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Jerome Edwards, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2018-00364 Filed 1-10-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Principal
Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Industrial Income Trust Inc. (the Company) for the
period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dwight L. Merriman III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                               
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|February 25, 2011 |  | /S/    DWIGHT L. MERRIMAN
III                 
|                  |  | Dwight L. Merriman III
Chief Executive Officer

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Industrial Income Trust Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas G. McGonagle, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                          
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|February 25, 2011 |  | /S/    THOMAS G.
MCGONAGLE                               
|                  |  | Thomas G. McGonagle
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
POLK COUNTY, Florida, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Elizabeth Connie BLACKBURN and William Michael Cothern a/k/a W.M. Cothern, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-1491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Anthony Mark BAXTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3019 & 4D16-3020

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[November 22, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the Company)
      for
      the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the Report), I, Bret H. Krevolin, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this periodic report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      issuer.





Date:
            November
                10, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
                Bret H. KrevolinBret
                H. KrevolinChief
                Financial Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Scott Lindberg v. Scott Callahan

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00559

- CV

Trial court case number: 19

- DCV

- 262220

Trial court: 458th District Court of Fort Bend County

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order, signed July 19, 2019, sealing

certain trial court document s

. Appellee filed in this Court a motion to seal the appellate record and briefs. Observing that no authority permits an appellate court to seal trial court documents, this Court issued an order in October abating the appeal and remanding f o r the trial court to consider whether to seal any additional trial court documents. If the trial court issued an order sealing

additional documen ts, the court was directed to see that a supplemental clerk’s record was filed in this Court containing the sealing order.

At appellant’s request, this Court subsequently issued an order, clarifying that the trial court

was not directed to reconsider its previous sealing order, but was ordered to consider additional documents that appellee argued should be sealed. In this order, the reporter’s record, appellee’s motion to seal, and appellant’s brief were also ordered sealed because they contained or discus sed the content of an order already sealed by the trial court

. The Court further ordered that appellee ’s brief, when filed, would also be filed under seal.

A lthough a supplemental clerk’s record was filed in January 2020, it contained no trial

court order sealing any additional trial court documents. At appellant’s urging, t his Court extend ed until February 25, 2020 the deadline for the trial court to consider s ealing additional documents. On February 27, 2020, appellant filed a motion to reinstate, and appellee has not filed a response

to that motion. To this Court’s knowledge, the trial court has not issued any additional orders sealing documents , and because the tria l court has had more than four months to rule, the failure to rule indicates that no ruling will occur

. Accordingly, t he Court grants appellant’s motion to reinstate and reinstate s th is appeal on the active docket. Appellee’s brief, to be filed under seal, is due within 30 days of the date of this

order

.
It is so ORDERED.Judge’s signature:

___ Justice Richard Hightower

________________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ March 17, 2020
Johnny SIPLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3735

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#  Supporting Broadband Tower Facilities in Rural America on Federal Properties Managed by the Department of the Interior

# Memorandum for the Secretary of the Interior

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

**Section 1**                    .                     *Policy*. It is the policy of the executive branch to use all viable tools to accelerate the deployment and adoption of affordable, reliable, modern high-speed broadband connectivity in rural America, including rural homes, farms, small businesses, manufacturing and production sites, tribal communities, transportation systems, and healthcare and education facilities. Lowering the costs of broadband deployment to rural areas can strengthen the business case for broadband facilities deployment and therefore amplify investments in broadband infrastructure. To that end, the executive branch will seek to make Federal assets more available for rural broadband deployment, with due consideration of national security concerns.                

**Sec. 2**                    .                     *Supporting Broadband Deployment*. (a) The Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) shall develop a plan to support rural broadband development and adoption by increasing access to tower facilities and other infrastructure assets managed by the Department of the Interior (DOI), consistent with applicable law and to the extent practicable. DOI shall draft model terms and conditions for use in securing tower facilities and other infrastructure assets for broadband deployment.                

(b) Within 180 days of the date of this memorandum, the Secretary shall report to the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy recording DOI's progress in identifying the assets that can be used to support rural broadband deployment and adoption.

**Sec. 3**                    .                     *General Provisions*. (a) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2018-00628

Billing code 3295-F8-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Shahid S. Asghar, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ECC Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation**;** and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 7, 2005