alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Donny Lenard GILLARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5351

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2018

Donny Lenard Gillard, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DENIED . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).

Osterhaus, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1262 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to require Federal employee health 

benefit plans to include assisted reproductive treatment benefits, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2023 

Ms. DUCKWORTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to require Federal 

employee health benefit plans to include assisted reproductive treatment benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Building 

5 FEHB Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TREATMENT BENEFITS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8904 of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1262 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(G) Assisted reproductive treatment bene4 fits.’’; and 

5 (B) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(G) Assisted reproductive treatment bene8 fits.’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(c) In this section, the term ‘assisted reproductive 

11 treatment’ means any treatment or procedure facilitating 

12 reproduction that includes the handling of human oocytes, 

13 embryos, or sperm, including the following: 

14 ‘‘(1) Assisted reproduction, including 

15 intravaginal insemination, intracervical insemination, 

16 and intrauterine insemination. 

17 ‘‘(2) Preservation of human oocytes, embryos, 

18 or sperm for later reproductive use. 

19 ‘‘(3) In vitro fertilization. 

20 ‘‘(4) Such other treatments, procedures, medi21 cations, laboratory services, and technologies facili22 tating reproduction as determined appropriate by 

23 the Director of the Office of Personnel Manage24 ment.’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 1262 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date that is 1 year 

3 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
From: Hulse, David G. <David.Hulse@alcoa.com>

Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 1:56 PM

To: Boyd, Rochelle

Subject: RE: FW: Alcoa Wenatchee WA

- Equipment reported to have zero production in 2011 ICR response

Market demand and actual production are quite different today than they were the last time Furnaces 1 and 11 were operated, so I think it

might be appropriate to estimate what current day actual production would look like. For furnace 1, I’d recommend using furnace 2 data,

since the furnaces are identical. Furnace 11 is fairly close in size and design to furnaces 3 and 4, so you could use data from one of those, or

average the two.

I hope that this helps, and I will try to reach you before the end of your day.

Dave

From: Boyd, Rochelle [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 12:15 PM

To: Hulse, David G.

Subject: EXT: FW: Alcoa Wenatchee WA - Equipment reported to have zero production in 2011 ICR response

Dear David:

This email is a follow-up to my voicemail earlier today. EPA has additional questions about equipment that was reported to have zero

production in the Information Collection Request (ICR) response you submitted for your facility back in 2011. (A copy of that ICR

response is attached, with the file name “2 74 _a_secal_all_114_1_31_11.xls”.) Specifically, the units (pieces of equipment) were

reported to have zero production in the 2011 ICR response are highlighted in yellow in the table below:

EMISSION_UNIT_ID MAXIMUM_PRODUCTION_OF_UNIT

(TPY) ACTUAL_PRODUCTION

(TPY) Comments EMISSION_PROCESS_GROUP

IP-1 36,000.00

- Group 1 Furnace—Handling

other than clean charge

IP-11 50,000.00

- Group 1 Furnace—Handling

other than clean charge

IP-2 36,000.00 1,859.00 Group 1 Furnace—Handling

other than clean charge

IP-3 52,000.00 2,161.00 Group 1 Furnace—Handling

other than clean charge

IP-4 52,000.00 3,434.00 Group 1 Furnace—Handling

other than clean charge

The EPA would like to get additional information regarding the equipment highlighted in yellow. However, please do not provide any

information in your response that is considered to be Confidential Business Information (CBI). Instead, if the information is

considered confidential, simply place the initials “CBI” in the appropriate cell of the table. The additional information needed

consists of:

1) Production for a recent year (2004 or later) having non-zero production. (If the unit is permanently shut down and no longer

permitted, the production should be listed as zero.)

2) If non-zero production for a particular unit results in production being reduced from another unit reported in the ICR

response, this should be explained in the “comments” column.Please contact me at 919-541-1390 or email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov if you have any questions about how to response to this request.

We would like to have this information on or before March 4, 2014, if possible.

Thank you,

Rochelle Boyd
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,792]


Aetrium Corporation, Corporate Division, North St. Paul, MN; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on December 31, 2008 in response to a 
petition filed by a State agency representative on behalf of workers of 
Aetrium Corporation, Corporate Division, North St. Paul, Minnesota.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-7124 Filed 3-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 05, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 05, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A1764. THE STATE v. JOHN SIDNEY STAPLETON.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00929]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9037-2]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7156 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 01/08/2018 Through 01/12/2018
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federalagencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20180001, Draft, USFS, ID, Little Boulder Project, Comment 
Period Ends: 03/09/2018, Contact: Stephanie Israel 208-476-8344.
EIS No. 20180002, Final, FHWA, MO, I-70 Second Tier Combined Final 
Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision, Pursuant to 23 
U.S.C. 139(N), The 30-day wait/review period does not apply to this 
FEIS, Contact: Kevin W. Ward 573-638-2600.
EIS No. 20180003, Draft, USFS, NV, Mt. Rose Ski Tahoe--Atoma Area 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/19/2018, Contact: Marnie Bonesteel 
775-352-1240.
EIS No. 20180004, Final, BR, NM, Pojoaque Basin Regional Water System 
EIS, Review Period Ends: 02/20/2018, Contact: Sarah Branum 505-462-
3591.
EIS No. 20180005, Draft, USFS, CO, Steamboat Ski Area Improvements, 
Comment Period Ends: 03/05/2018, Contact: Erica Dickerman 970-870-2185.

    Dated: January 16, 2018.
Kelly Knight,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2018-00929 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
# Official Journal L 275I/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 275I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 616 November 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 275I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 616 November 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1652 of 6 November 2018 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2018) 7445)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1652 of 6 November 2018 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2018) 7445)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2018) 7445)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Hedges, Vice President, Controller and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 13, 2010



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Hedges                       
|David A. Hedges                           
|VP, Controller and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey C. Grace, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffrey C. Grace                                                               
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Jeffrey C. Grace Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Annual Report of KKR Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Saturnino S. Fanlo,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey B. Van Horn, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| February 23, 2007 |                                                                                            |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ** **             | /s/ SATURNINO  S. FANLO                                                                         |
| ** **             | **Saturnino  S. Fanlo*Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)***                 |
| ** **             | /s/ JEFFREY  B. VAN HORN                                                                        |
| ** **             | **Jeffrey  B. Van Horn*Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*** |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics 

The first meeting of the Data Users Advisory Committee will be held Thursday, April 23, 2009. The meeting will be held in the Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Washington, DC. 

                    The Data Users Advisory Committee is a technical committee composed of data users from various sectors of the U.S. economy, including labor, business, research, academic and government communities. Committee members are called upon to provide advice on technical matters related to the collection, tabulation, and analysis of the Bureau's statistics, on its published reports, and on the broader                           ( print page 14162)                        aspects of its overall mission and function.                 

The meeting will be held in Meeting Room 1 of the Postal Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows: 

8:30 Registration 

9:00 Opening Remarks and introductions 

10:15 Discussion of future priorities 

11:15 BLS Web site redesign 

1:15 BLS product initiatives 

2:45 Debunking myths about BLS data series 

4:45 Conclusion

The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Tracy A. Jack, Data Users Advisory Committee, on 202-691-5869. Individuals with disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Ms. Jack at least two days prior to the meeting date. 

Signed at Washington, DC, the 25th day of March 2009. 

Philip L. Rones, 

Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

 [FR Doc. E9-6998 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 124 

To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems and for 

prevailing rate employees by 8.7 percent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2023 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. PADILLA, Ms. WARREN, Mr. 

FETTERMAN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. KAINE, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CASEY, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. BROWN, Mr. 

LUJA ́N, Mr. HEINRICH, and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems 

and for prevailing rate employees by 8.7 percent, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Adjustment 

5 of Income Rates Act’’ or the ‘‘FAIR Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO RATES OF PAY. 

7 (a) STATUTORY PAY SYSTEMS.—For calendar year 

8 2024, the percentage adjustment under section 5303 of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 124 IS

1 title 5, United States Code, in the rates of basic pay under 

2 the statutory pay systems (as defined in section 5302 of 

3 title 5, United States Code) shall be 4.7 percent. 

4 (b) PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES.—Notwith5 standing the wage survey requirements under section 

6 5343(b) of title 5, United States Code, for fiscal year 

7 2024, the rates of basic pay (as in effect on the last day 

8 of fiscal year 2023 under section 5343(a) of such title) 

9 for prevailing rate employees in each wage area and the 

10 rates of basic pay under sections 5348 and 5349 of such 

11 title shall be increased by 4.7 percent. 

12 SEC. 3. ADJUSTMENT TO LOCALITY PAY. 

13 For calendar year 2024, the percentage adjustment 

14 under section 5304 of title 5, United States Code, shall 

15 be an increase of 4.0 percent. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1 Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 thCir. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

_______________________________________

No. 00-10388 SUMMARY CALENDAR

_______________________________________ G DAVID WESTFALL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; G. DAVID WESTFALL; CHRISTINA WESTFALL; JOHN WESTFALL; STEFANI PODVIN; JOHN D. PODVIN; Individually and as members of the limited partnership Plaintiffs-Appellants ,

v. TOMMY PARKS, ET AL, Defendants , JAMES JONES AND NAVARRO COUNTY, TEXAS,

Defendants-Appellees

.

_______________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-3301-L)

_______________________________________

January 26, 2001 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, AND DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: 1 The Westfall Family Limited Partnership owned a herd of cattle kept on nine tracts of land in Ellis and Navarro Counties in North Texas. In 1996, an official from the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (“the SPCA”) reported to the Ellis and Navarro County Sheriffs’` Departments that the Westfall herd was being mistreated. The departments investigated the SPCAofficial’s charge and, finding it to be well-founded, seized more

than 175 head of cattle and two donkeys owned by the Westfall Family Limited Partnership. Appellants brought suit against the counties and individual officials claiming violations of their Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution and violations of applicable state law. The district court barred suit against appellee-Jones based on qualified immunity and granted summary judgment in favor of appellee-Navarro County based on a lack of policy or custom in the county of seizing property pursuant to a warrant lacking probable cause. This appeal followed. Having reviewed the record, the briefs, and the recommendation of the magistrate as adopted by the district court in its order, we agree that summary judgment in favor of appellees was appropriate. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
D.M.M., the child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1497

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1405

SOLOMON OLADEJI AKIODE, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A29-846-895) Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 15, 2000Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beverly Yeskoli, HYDER & GALSTON, Norfolk, Virginia, for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Kristen A. Giuffreda, Anh-Thu P. Mai, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Solomon Oladeji Akiode seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. Our review of the record discloses that the Board properly found that Akiode failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Akiode v. INS , No. A29-846-895 (B.I.A. Mar. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED