alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.

Date: March 22, 2007



By:

/s/    WILLIAM J.
ZAISERName:

William J. ZaiserTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Carlos E. TORRES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1326

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-17-00859-CV

Maria VALDEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE MCCLENAHAN LAW FIRM and The J. Guerra Law Firm,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-01421

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 28, 2018

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of 

service to appellees, who have not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant. See id. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Zaiser, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.

Date: March 23, 2006



By:

/s/    WILLIAM J.
ZAISERName:

William J. ZaiserTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Narcius BRUNO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3322

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 10/2/2013 Sample Number: 133896-001 Date Collected:09/25/2013 08:00 Date Received:9/25/2013 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 310 0.50 DPC EPA 200.8 0.20 10/01/2013 

### Sample Number: 133896-002 Date Collected:09/25/2013 08:00 Date Received:9/25/2013 

### 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 28.9 0.50 DPC EPA 200.8 0.20 10/01/2013 

### Sample Number: 133896-003 Date Collected:09/25/2013 08:00 Date Received:9/25/2013 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 1.7 0.50 DPC EPA 200.8 0.20 10/01/2013

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 133896 Page 1 of 1
Debora L. PATZER, Appellant, v. MIA REAL HOLDINGS, LLC, Trans Global Financial, LLC, and Third Federal Savings & Loan Association of Cleveland, Appellees.

No. 4D16-4011

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADDED BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas J.
Bisko, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this periodic report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
issuer.





Date:   November
      15, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Thomas J. BiskoThomas
      J. BiskoChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the Company) for the period ended

June 30, 2012, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas J. Bisko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this periodic report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.





|Date:August 10, 2012 |  | By: | /s/ Thomas J. Bisko    
|-------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|                     |  |     | Thomas J. Bisko        
|                     |  |     | Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 529 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 22, 2023. 

Resolved, That House Resolution 503 is hereby re-referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
|   | (1)                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Winland. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | Winland Electronics,      Inc. |                          |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                             |                           |                          |   |
| Date:       August 13, 2010 | By:                            | /s/ Glenn      A. Kermes |   |
|                             |                           | Glenn      A. Kermes          |   |
|                             |                           | Chief      Financial Officer  |   |
|                             |                           |                          |   |
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post

- consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 April 9, 2013

Mr. David K. Paylor

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Dear Director Paylor:

On March 20, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the

Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

(VADEQ) pertaining to the 2008 ozone standard classification and implementation in the Nort hern

Virginia nonattainment area. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically

complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) action.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may di rect them to Mr. Gregory Becoat, Air

Program Planning , at (215) 814

- 2036, or at becoat.gregory@epa.gov. He is the principal contact for this

rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division
Kurt MAKOVSKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 14, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Ecotality, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan R. Read, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Barry S. Baer, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jonathan R. Read

Jonathan R. Read

Chief Executive Officer

March 29, 2007







/s/ Barry S. Baer

Barry S. Baer

Chief Financial Officer

March 29, 2007
Albert Richard GLOCKZIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1353

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Sergio Winston Archer HENDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 3, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE EX REL. Walter D. FAIRLEY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0121

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to the vindictive prosecution and due process claims, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2. The remaining challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 68 (Friday, April 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8095]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35231]


Indiana Northeastern Railroad Company--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Pigeon River Railroad Company

    Indiana Northeastern Railroad Company (INRC), a Class III rail 
carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 
to acquire from Pigeon River Railroad Company (PGRV) and to operate, 
approximately 9.27 miles of rail line extending from milepost 122.53, 
near the Town of Ashley, in Steuben County, IN, to milepost 131.8, near 
the unincorporated community of South Milford, in LaGrange County, IN.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on April 25, 2009, 
the effective date of the exemption (30 days after the exemption is 
filed).
    INRC certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of 
this transaction will not result in INRC becoming a Class II or Class I 
rail carrier and further certifies that its projected annual revenues 
will not exceed $5 million.
    According to INRC, there is no provision or agreement that may 
limit future interchange with a third-party connecting carrier.
    Pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 
110-161, section 193, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007), nothing in this decision 
authorizes the following activities at any solid waste rail transfer 
facility: Collecting, storing or transferring solid waste outside of 
its original shipping container; or separating or processing solid 
waste (including baling, crushing, compacting and shredding). The term 
``solid waste'' is defined in section 1004 of the Solid Waste Disposal 
Act, 42 U.S.C. 6903.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke does not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. 
Petitions for stay must be filed no later than April 17, 2009 (at least 
7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 35231, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Gordon P. MacDougall, Esq., 
1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Room 919, Washington, DC 20036-5444.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: April 6, 2009.

    By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
 [FR Doc. E9-8095 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,357] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 24, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed the Maine TAA Coordinator on behalf of workers at Kelly Lumber, Ashland, Maine. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of March 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-7758 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Touchstone Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the "Report"), I, Michelle L.
Hirsh, Accounting Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michelle L. Hirsh
--------------------------
Michelle L. Hirsh
Accounting Manager
August 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998  
<CASH>                                            496
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,474
<PP&E>                                         29,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                (3,474)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,116
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                 
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       11,175
<OTHER-SE>                                        282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,628
<SALES>                                         4,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,786
<CGS>                                           2,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (215)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (724)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                           
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (724)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.02)
        

</TABLE>
From: Barbara Baillie <bbaillie@greenpnt.com>

ANM-115, Airframe & Cabin Safety

To: Jayson Claar/ANM/FAA@FAA,

Date: 04/12/2013 11:12 AM

Subject: Greenpoint Petition FAA-2013-0245.

Hi Jayson,

I just picked up your voicemail. Thanks for the message.

I want to clarify that my request is limited to No Smoking signs only. I noticed later that I included the

RTS sign in my additional request, but this was because it is included in that particular special condition

and I wanted to repeat is exactly. We only want relief from the No smoking sign part of the condition.

Sorry to add confusion. I understand I cannot increase scope without providing additional rationale, etc.

Does this make sense?

Call me if you want to talk, I am here most of the day.

Barbara Baillie

Senior Certification Engineer (DER)

GREENPOINT Technologies, Inc.

4600 Carillon Point | Kirkland, WA 98033

Direct 425.739.7877 | www.greenpnt.com
A.B., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4624

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.