EX-4.1




 EXHIBIT 4.1 

DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY’S SECURITIES 

REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

As of December 31, 2021, we had one class of stock registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”): our common stock, par value $0.00025 per share (“Common Stock”). The following is a summary of the material terms of our Common Stock, as well as certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation, as
amended and supplemented (our “Charter”), and our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “Bylaws”). The summary is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Charter and Bylaws, each of which is incorporated by
reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this exhibit is a part. It also summarizes certain relevant provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), and is
subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the MGCL. References herein to our “Company” or “our” refer to Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. 

Description of Common Stock 

All holders of shares of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by stockholders, including election of
our directors, but excluding any matter that, pursuant to the terms of any class or series of our preferred stock, may be voted on only by the holders of preferred stock. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at a meeting in which
directors are being elected and at which a quorum is present. Our Charter does not provide for cumulative voting in the election of our directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock can
effectively elect all of the directors then standing for election, and the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors. Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding class or series of preferred stock (or other
capital stock), the holders of shares of our Common Stock are entitled to such distributions as may be authorized from time to time by our board of directors and declared by us out of legally available funds and, in the event of our liquidation,
dissolution, or winding up, are also entitled to share ratably in our assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders after payment of, or adequate provision for, all of our known debts and liabilities. All holders of our Common Stock
share equally in any distributions authorized by our board of directors and declared by us and payable to holders of our Common Stock. 

Our common stockholders have no preference, exchange, sinking fund, or redemption rights and have no preemptive rights to purchase or
subscribe for any of our capital stock. As permitted by the MGCL, our Charter does not include a provision providing that our stockholders are not entitled to exercise the rights of an objecting stockholder, sometimes referred to as “appraisal
rights.” However, the MGCL further provides that these rights are not available to holders of stock of any class or series listed on a national securities exchange. Accordingly, the Common Stock is not entitled to these rights (applicable only
under limited circumstances, including a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or transfer of assets). Subject to the restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock in our Charter, holders of shares of our Common Stock have equal dividend,
liquidation, and other rights. Because our operating assets are held by Broadstone Net Lease, LLC (the “OP”) or its wholly-owned subsidiaries, these subsidiaries may be able to merge or transfer all or substantially all of their assets
without the approval of our stockholders. Stockholders are not liable for our acts or obligations solely due to their status as stockholders. 

Our board of directors has authorized the issuance of shares of our capital stock without certificates. Shares of our Common Stock are held in
“uncertificated” form, which eliminates the physical handling and safekeeping responsibilities inherent in owning transferable share certificates and eliminates the need to return a duly executed share certificate to effect a transfer.
Information regarding restrictions on the 











 
transferability of our shares of Common Stock that, under Maryland law, would otherwise have been required to appear on our share certificates are instead furnished to our stockholders upon
request and without charge. We maintain a stock ledger that contains the name and address of each stockholder and the number of shares that the stockholder holds. 

Pursuant to the limited liability company agreement of the OP, as amended (the “OP Agreement”), as a general rule, each non-managing member may exercise a redemption right to redeem his or her OP Units for either cash or, at our election, a number of shares of our Common Stock at any time beginning six months following the date of
the issuance of the OP Units held by the non-managing member. 
 Power to Issue Additional Shares
of Common Stock and Preferred Stock 
 We believe that the power to issue additional shares of our Common Stock or preferred stock and
to classify or reclassify unissued shares of our Common Stock or preferred stock and to issue the classified or reclassified shares provides us with increased flexibility in structuring possible future financings and acquisitions and in meeting
other needs which might arise. Pursuant to our Charter, our board of directors may take these actions without approval by our stockholders, unless stockholder approval is required by applicable law, the terms of any class or series of our stock, or
the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our stock may be listed or traded. Although we have no present intention of doing so, we could issue a class or series of stock that could delay, defer, or prevent a transaction
or a change in control of our Company that might involve a premium price for our stock or that our stockholders otherwise believe to be in their best interest. In addition, our issuance of additional shares of stock in the future could dilute the
voting and other rights of the holders of shares of Common Stock. 
 Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer of Shares of Capital Stock

 For us to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), no more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares of our
stock may be owned, directly or indirectly through the application of certain attribution rules under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), by any five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code to include specified
entities, during the last half of any taxable year, excluding our first taxable year for which we elected to be taxed as a REIT. In addition, the outstanding shares of our stock must be owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a 12-month taxable year or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year, excluding our first taxable year for which we elected to be taxed as a REIT. In addition, we must meet requirements regarding the
nature of our gross income to qualify as a REIT. One of these requirements is that at least 75% of our gross income for each calendar year must consist of rents from real property and income from other real property investments. Subject to special
rules for leases to our taxable REIT subsidiaries, the aggregate of the rents received by the OP from any tenant will not qualify as rents from real property, which could result in our loss of REIT status, if we own, actually or constructively
within the meaning of certain provisions of the Code, 10% or more of the ownership interests in that tenant. To assist us in preserving our status as a REIT, among other consequences, our Charter contains limitations on the ownership and transfer of
shares of our stock which are intended to prohibit: (1) any person or entity from owning or acquiring, directly or indirectly, more than 9.8% of the value of the aggregate of our then outstanding capital stock (of any class or series) or more
than 9.8% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the aggregate of our then outstanding Common Stock and (2) any transfer of or other event or transaction with respect to shares of capital stock that would result in
the beneficial ownership of our outstanding shares of capital stock by fewer than 100 persons. In addition, our Charter includes provisions intended to prohibit any transfer of, or other event with respect to, shares of our capital stock that would
result in us being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise failing to qualify as a REIT (including, but not limited to, ownership that would result in us owning an interest in a tenant if the
income derived by us from such tenant would cause us to fail to satisfy any of the gross income requirements of Section 856(c) of the Code). 











 Our Charter provides that the shares of our capital stock of any class or series that, if
transferred, would result in a violation of the ownership limits described above will be transferred automatically to a trust effective on the business day before the purported transfer of such shares of our capital stock. We will designate a
trustee of the trust that will not be affiliated with us or the purported transferee or record holder. We will also name a charitable organization as beneficiary of the trust. The trustee will receive all distributions on the shares of our capital
stock in the trust and will hold such distributions in trust for the benefit of the beneficiary. The trustee also will vote the shares of capital stock in the trust and, subject to Maryland law, will have the authority to rescind as void any vote
cast by the intended transferee prior to our discovery that the shares have been transferred to the trust and to recast the vote in accordance with the desires of the trustee acting for the benefit of the charitable beneficiary. However, if we have
already taken irreversible corporate action, then the trustee will not have the authority to rescind and recast the vote. Our Charter provides that the intended transferee will acquire no rights in such shares of capital stock, unless, in the case
of a transfer that would cause a violation of the 9.8% ownership limits the transfer is exempted (prospectively or retroactively) by our board of directors from the ownership limits based upon receipt of information (including certain
representations and undertakings from the intended transferee) that such transfer would not result in us being “closely held” within the meaning of Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the ownership interest is held
during the last half of a taxable year), or otherwise failing to qualify as a REIT (including, but not limited to, ownership that would result in us owning an interest in a tenant that is described in Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code if the
income derived by us from such tenant would cause us to fail to satisfy any of the gross income requirements of Section 856(c) of the Code). If the transfer to the trust would not be effective for any reason to prevent a violation of the
foregoing limitations on ownership and transfer, then our Charter provides that the transfer of that number of shares that otherwise would cause the violation will be null and void, with the intended transferee acquiring no rights in such shares. In
addition, our Charter provides that any transfer of shares of our capital stock that would result in shares of our capital stock being beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons will be null and void and the intended transferee will acquire no
rights in such shares of our capital stock. 
 Within 20 days of receiving notice from us that shares of our stock have been transferred to
the trust, the trustee will sell the shares to a person designated by the trustee, whose ownership of the shares will not violate the above ownership limitations. Upon the sale, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will
terminate and the trustee will distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the intended transferee and to the charitable beneficiary as follows. The intended transferee will receive an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the price paid by the
intended transferee for the shares or, if the intended transferee did not give value for the shares in connection with the event causing the shares to be held in the trust (e.g., a gift, devise or other similar transaction), the closing or last
sales price reported on the NYSE of the shares on the day of the event causing the shares to be held in the trust and (2) the price received by the trustee from the sale or other disposition of the shares. Any net sale proceeds in excess of the
amount payable to the intended transferee will be paid immediately to the charitable beneficiary. If, prior to our discovery that shares have been transferred to the trust, the shares are sold by the intended transferee, then (1) the shares
will be deemed to have been sold on behalf of the trust and (2) to the extent that the intended transferee received an amount for the shares that exceeds the amount described above that such intended transferee was entitled to receive, such
excess will be paid to the trustee upon demand. 
 In addition, shares of our stock held in the trust will be deemed to have been offered
for sale to us, or our designee, at a price per share equal to the lesser of (1) the price per share in the transaction that resulted in the transfer to the trust (or, in the case of a devise or gift, the closing or last sales price reported on
the NYSE at the time of the devise or gift) and (2) 95% of the closing or last sales price reported on the NYSE on the date we, or our designee, accept the offer. We will have the right to accept the offer until the trustee has sold the shares. Upon
a sale to us, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the intended transferee. 











 Any person who acquires or attempts or intends to acquire shares of our capital stock in
violation of the foregoing restrictions or who would have owned shares of our capital stock that were transferred to any such trust is required to give immediate written notice to us or, in the case of a proposed or attempted transaction, at least
15 days’ prior written notice. In both cases, such persons must provide to us such other information as we may request to determine the effect, if any, of such event on our status as a REIT. The foregoing restrictions will continue to apply
until our board of directors determines it is no longer in our best interest to attempt to, or to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance is no longer required in order for REIT qualification. 

The ownership limits do not apply to a person or persons that our board of directors exempts (prospectively or retroactively) from the
ownership limits upon receiving appropriate assurances from such person that our qualification as a REIT is not jeopardized. Any person who owns more than 5.0% (or such other percentage as required under the Code or the Treasury Regulations
promulgated thereunder) of the outstanding shares of our capital stock during any taxable year will be asked to deliver a statement or affidavit setting forth, among other things, the number of shares of our capital stock beneficially owned. 

These restrictions on ownership and transfer apply to all classes and series of our capital stock, including our Common Stock, and could
delay, defer, or prevent a transaction or a change of control of our Company that might involve a premium price for our stock that our stockholders believe to be in their best interest. 

Transfer Agent and Registrar 

The transfer agent and registrar for our shares of our Common Stock is Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 

Certain Provisions of the MGCL and of Our Charter and Bylaws 

The following description of certain provisions of the MGCL and of our Charter and Bylaws is only a summary. For a complete description, we
refer you to the MGCL, our Charter and Bylaws, as applicable. 
 Our Board of Directors 

Our Charter and Bylaws provide that the number of directors of our Company may be established, increased, or decreased only by a majority of
our directors then serving but may not be fewer than the minimum number required under the MGCL (which is one) or our Charter (whichever is greater) nor, unless our Bylaws are amended, more than 12. 

Removal of Directors 

Under the MGCL, subject to the rights of holders of one or more classes or series of preferred stock to elect or remove one or more directors,
and unless the board of directors is classified (which ours is not) or the charter requires cause or a higher vote (which ours does not), stockholders may remove any director, with or without cause, by the affirmative vote of a majority of all the
votes entitled to be cast generally for the election of directors. 
 Business Combinations 

Under the MGCL, certain “business combinations” (including a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange, or, in certain
circumstances specified under the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities) between a Maryland corporation and any interested stockholder, or an affiliate of such an interested stockholder, are prohibited for
five years after the most 











 recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Maryland
law defines an interested stockholder as: 
  

	•	 	 any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the
corporation’s outstanding voting stock; or 


  

	•	 	 an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the
two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then-outstanding voting stock of the corporation. 



A person is not an interested stockholder under the MGCL if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which the person
otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. In approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of the approval, with any terms and conditions determined by it.

 After such five-year period, any such business combination must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved
by the affirmative vote of at least: 
  

	•	 	 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and



  

	•	 	 two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock
of the corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom (or with whose affiliate) the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder. 



These supermajority approval requirements do not apply if, among other conditions, the corporation’s common stockholders receive a
minimum price (as defined in the MGCL) for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its share. 

These provisions of the MGCL do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by a corporation’s board of
directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. As permitted by the MGCL, our Charter exempts any business combination between us and any other person from the provisions of this statute. Consequently,
the five-year prohibition and the supermajority vote requirements will not apply to business combinations involving us. As a result, any person will be able to enter into business combinations with us that may not be in the best interests of our
stockholders, without compliance with the supermajority vote requirements and other provisions of the statute. 
 Control Share
Acquisitions 
 The MGCL provides that a holder of “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control
share acquisition” has no voting rights with respect to those shares except to the extent approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by stockholders entitled
to exercise or direct the exercise of the voting power in the election of directors generally but excluding: (1) the person who has made or proposes to make the control share acquisition; (2) any officer of the corporation; or (3) any
employee of the corporation who is also a director of the corporation. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other such shares of stock previously acquired by the acquirer or in respect of which the
acquirer is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges: 












	•	 	 one-tenth or more but less than
one-third; 


  

	•	 	 one-third or more but less than a majority; or 



 

	•	 	 a majority or more of all voting power. 



Control shares do not include shares that the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder
approval. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition, directly or indirectly, of ownership of, or the power to direct the exercise of voting power with respect to, issued and outstanding control shares, subject to certain
exceptions. 
 A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition, upon satisfaction of certain conditions (including an
undertaking to pay expenses and making an “acquiring person statement” as described in the MGCL), may compel the board of directors of the company to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider
the voting rights of the control shares. If no request for a special meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting. 

If voting rights of control shares are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an “acquiring person
statement” as required by the statute, then, subject to certain conditions and limitations, the corporation may redeem any or all of the control shares (except those for which voting rights have previously been approved) for fair value
determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the acquirer or, if a meeting of stockholders at which the voting rights of such shares are considered and not
approved is held, as of the date of such meeting. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise
appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of such appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid by the acquirer in the control share acquisition. 

The control share acquisition statute does not apply (1) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation, or statutory share exchange if
the corporation is a party to the transaction or (2) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation. 

Our Charter and Bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all control share acquisitions by any
person of shares of our stock. 
 Subtitle 8 

Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL permits a Maryland corporation with a class of equity securities registered under the Exchange Act and at
least three independent directors to elect, by provision in its charter or bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any contrary provision in the charter or bylaws, to be subject to any or all of the following five
provisions: 
  

	•	 	 a classified board; 



 

	•	 	 a two-thirds vote requirement for removing a director;



  

	•	 	 a requirement that the number of directors be fixed only by vote of the directors; 














	•	 	 a requirement that a vacancy on the board be filled only by a vote of the remaining directors (whether or not
they constitute a quorum) and for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies; or 



 

	•	 	 a majority requirement for the calling of a special meeting of stockholders. 



By resolution of our board of directors, we have opted out of all provisions of Subtitle 8, including the provisions that would permit us to
classify our board of directors without stockholder approval. Moreover, this resolution provided that, without the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the matter by stockholders entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, we may not elect to be subject to any of the other provisions of Subtitle 8, and this resolution may not be amended without the prior approval of a similar vote of our stockholders. 

Through provisions in our Charter and Bylaws unrelated to Subtitle 8, we (1) vest in our board of directors the exclusive power to fix
the number of directors and (2) require, unless called by our chairman, our president, our chief executive officer, a majority of our board of directors, or a majority of the independent directors, the written request of stockholders entitled
to cast not less than a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on such matter at such meeting to call a special meeting of stockholders. If we receive stockholder approval to elect to be subject to the provisions of Subtitle 8 relating to a
classified board, our board of directors would automatically be classified into three classes with staggered terms of office of three years each. In such circumstance, the classification and staggered terms of office of the directors would make it
more difficult for a third party to gain control of the board of directors since at least two annual meetings of stockholders, instead of one, generally would be required to effect a change in the majority of the directors. 

Amendments to Our Charter and Bylaws 

As provided in the MGCL, amendments to our Charter must be advised by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. In addition, the holders of our Common Stock, voting as a separate class, are required to approve any amendment to our Charter which will affect such
holders differently than the holders of our Common Stock. Pursuant to our Bylaws, both our board of directors and a majority of our stockholders are able to amend our Bylaws. 

Meetings of Stockholders 

Under our Bylaws and pursuant to the MGCL, annual meetings of stockholders will be held each year at a date and at the time and place
determined by our board of directors. Special meetings of stockholders may be called by the chairman of our board of directors, our president, our chief executive officer, a majority of our board of directors, or a majority of our independent
directors. Additionally, subject to the provisions of our Bylaws, special meetings of the stockholders to act on any matter must be called by our secretary upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the
votes entitled to be cast on such matter at such meeting who have requested the special meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in, and provided the information and certifications required by, our Bylaws. Only matters set forth in the
notice of the special meeting may be considered and acted upon at such a meeting. Our secretary will inform the requesting stockholders of the reasonably estimated cost of preparing and delivering the notice of meeting (including our proxy
materials), and the requesting stockholder must pay such estimated cost before our secretary may prepare and deliver the notice of the special meeting. 











 Advance Notice of Director Nominations and New Business 

Our Bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our board of directors
and the proposal of business to be considered by a stockholder may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by or at the direction of our board of directors, or (3) by a stockholder who is a stockholder of record
both at the time of giving the advance notice required by our Bylaws and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting in the election of each individual so nominated or on any such other business, and who has complied with the
advance notice procedures of our Bylaws. With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the meeting. Nominations of individuals for election to our board of directors
at a special meeting may be made only (1) by or at the direction of our board of directors or (2) provided that the special meeting has been called in accordance with our Bylaws for the purpose of electing directors, by a stockholder who
is a stockholder of record both at the time of giving the advance notice required by our Bylaws and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting in the election of each individual so nominated and who has complied with the
advance notice provisions of our Bylaws. 
 The purpose of requiring stockholders to give advance notice of nominations and other proposals
is to afford our board of directors and our stockholders the opportunity to consider the qualifications of the proposed nominees or the advisability of the other proposals and, to the extent considered necessary by our board of directors, to inform
stockholders and make recommendations regarding the nominations or other proposals. Although our Bylaws do not give our board of directors the power to disapprove timely stockholder nominations and proposals, our Bylaws may have the effect of
precluding a contest for the election of directors or proposals for other action if the proper procedures are not followed, and of discouraging or deterring a third party from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors
to our board of directors or to approve its own proposal. 
 Anti-Takeover Effect of Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our
Charter and Bylaws 
 The restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock and the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws could
delay, defer, or prevent a transaction or a change of control of our Company. Likewise, if our board of directors were to elect to be subject to the business combination provisions of the MGCL or if the provision in our Bylaws opting out of the
control share acquisition provisions of the MGCL were amended or rescinded, these provisions of the MGCL could have similar anti-takeover effects. 

Further, a majority of our entire board of directors has the power, to increase or decrease the aggregate number of authorized shares of stock
or the number of shares of any class or series of stock that we are authorized to issue, to classify, and reclassify any unissued shares of our stock into other classes or series of stock, and to authorize us to issue the newly classified shares,
and could authorize the issuance of shares of Common Stock or another class or series of stock, including a class or series of preferred stock, that could provide the holders thereof with specified dividend payments and payments upon liquidation
prior or senior to those of the Common Stock, and could have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of us. These actions may be taken without stockholder approval unless such approval is required by applicable law, the
terms of any other class or series of our stock, or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which any of our stock is listed or traded. We believe that the power of our board of directors to increase or decrease the number
of authorized shares of stock and to classify or reclassify unissued shares of our Common Stock or preferred stock and thereafter to cause us to issue such shares of stock will provide us with increased flexibility in structuring possible future
financings and acquisitions and in meeting other needs which might arise. 
 Our Charter and Bylaws also will provide that the number of
directors may be established only by our board of directors, which prevents our stockholders from increasing the number of our directors and filling any vacancies created by such increase with their own nominees. 











 The provisions of our Bylaws discussed above under the captions “-Meetings of
Stockholders” and “-Advance Notice of Director Nominations and New Business” will require stockholders seeking to call a special meeting, nominate an individual for election as a director, or propose other business at an annual or
special meeting to comply with certain notice and information requirements. We believe that these provisions will help to assure the continuity and stability of our business strategies and policies as determined by our board of directors and promote
good corporate governance by providing us with clear procedures for calling special meetings, information about a stockholder proponent’s interest in us, and adequate time to consider stockholder nominees and other business proposals. However,
these provisions, alone or in combination, could make it more difficult for our stockholders to remove incumbent directors or fill vacancies on our board of directors with their own nominees and could delay, defer, or prevent a change in control,
including a proxy contest or tender offer that might involve a premium price for our common stockholders or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders. 

Forum for Certain Litigation 

Our Bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City,
Maryland, or, if that Court does not have jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, will be the sole and exclusive forum for (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of our
company, except with respect to actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, (b) any action asserting a claim of breach of any duty owed by any of our directors or officers or employees to us or to our stockholders, (c) any
action asserting a claim against us or any of our directors or officers or employees arising pursuant to any provision of the MGCL or our Charter or Bylaws, or (d) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our directors or officers or
employees that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. 
 Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Directors and Officers

 Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and
officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property, or services or active and deliberate dishonesty that is established by a final
judgment and is material to the cause of action. Our Charter contains such a provision that eliminates such liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. 

The MGCL requires a Maryland corporation (unless its charter provides otherwise, which our Charter does not) to indemnify a director or
officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made or threatened to be made a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. The MGCL permits a Maryland corporation to
indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements, and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made or are threatened
to be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that: 
  

	•	 	 the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and



  

	 	○ 	 	 was committed in bad faith; or 



 

	 	○ 	 	 was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; 



 

	•	 	 the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or















	•	 	 in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act
or omission was unlawful. 


 However, under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify a director or officer for
an adverse judgment in a suit by or on behalf of the corporation or if the director or officer was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received, unless, in either case, a court orders indemnification and then only for
expenses. A court may order indemnification if it determines that the director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification, even though the director or officer did not meet the prescribed standard of conduct or was adjudged
liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received. 
 Our Charter provides, as permitted by the MGCL, that we may advance
reasonable expenses incurred by a director or officer who is party to a proceeding in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding upon our receipt of: 
  

	•	 	 a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the
standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by us; and 


  

	•	 	 a written undertaking by the director or officer or on his or her behalf to repay the amount advanced to him
or her if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct for indemnification by us was not met. 


 Our Charter
also requires us to provide the same indemnification and advancement of expenses that we are permitted to provide to directors and officers to any person who served as an employee or agent of our Company. 

Indemnification Agreements 

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements require
that, subject to certain conditions, we indemnify each director and officer to the fullest extent permitted by law against any and all liabilities and expenses to which they may become subject by reason of their service as a director, officer,
employee, or agent of our company, and that we advance to each director and officer all related expenses incurred by each director or officer in defense of any claim or proceeding without any preliminary determination of the director’s or
officer’s entitlement to indemnification; provided, that any amounts advanced will be refunded to us by the indemnified director or officer if it is ultimately determined that they did not meet the standard of conduct necessary for
indemnification. The indemnification agreements also require that we maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance covering our directors and officers on terms at least as favorable as the policy coverage in place as of the date
each indemnification agreement is entered into. Each indemnification agreement may only be amended by the mutual written agreement of our Company and the director or officer party thereto. 

In addition to the indemnification agreements described above, we have also purchased and maintain directors’ and officers’
liability insurance covering that insures both us and our directors and officers against exposure and liability normally insured against under such policies, including exposure to liabilities of the type addressed by the indemnity provisions
described above. 
 REIT Qualification 

Our Charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without approval of our stockholders, if
it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to be qualified as a REIT.