alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of A.D., a Child

No. 06-22-00083-CV

Appeal from the 307th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2021-

696-DR). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Chief Justice Stevens, Justice van Cleef

and Justice Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 21, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Charles BARLOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00077-CV

NGA LY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

ASHLEY LY TRUONG AND THE ESTATE OF TIFFANY LY TRUONG, Appellant

V.

DAVID NGUYEN, AKA HUNG QUOC NGUYEN, A/K/A NGUYEN HUNG QUOC; 

HOA THI TRAN, A/K/A THUAN TUAN TRAN, A/K/A HOA NGUYEN; TRAN DIEM 

THUY; DIEM TRAN; AND SAINT JOSEPH VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM 

ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellees

Appeal from the 127th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2008-17570).

TO THE 127TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 19th day of March 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on December 4, 2013. After submitting the 

case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised 

by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment 

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Nga Ly, 

Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Ashley Ly 
Truong and the Estate of Tiffany Ly Truong, pay all appellate 

costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered March 19, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Higley.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

May 29, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Cornelius AKINE, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and State of Florida, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2042

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
No. 99-40644 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40644 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERMELINDA RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-481-01

-------------------- April 7, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ermelinda Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez did not file a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Joseph DEGREGORIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4572

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD NORTON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-35772 

D.C. No. 3:16-cv-05641-JCC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 27, 2019**

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 

Edward Norton appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Commissioner 

of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and 

supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 29 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

(Act). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We 

review de novo, Attmore v. Colvin, 827 F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir. 2016), and we 

affirm. 

We reject Norton’s contention that the ALJ committed harmful error at step 

two by failing to list chronic pain syndrome or mild sacroiliac arthritis as severe 

impairments. Because the ALJ resolved this step in Norton’s favor, and considered 

all of Norton’s pain and mental health symptoms in formulating the residual 

function capacity, any error was harmless. See Buck v. Berryhill, 869 F.3d 1040, 

1048-49 (9th Cir. 2017).

The ALJ provided specific and legitimate reasons to reject the controverted 

opinions of two medical doctors as to Norton’s physical limitations and four 

mental health professionals as to Norton’s mental limitations. See Garrison v. 

Colvin, 759 F.3d 995, 1012-13 (9th Cir. 2014). We reject Norton’s contention that 

the ALJ’s stated reasons are not sufficiently specific. The ALJ set out the 

conflicting medical evidence, stated his interpretation, made findings, and referred 

to these findings in discounting the medical opinions. See id. Substantial evidence 

supports the ALJ’s findings that the physical limitations assessed by Dr. Staker and 

Dr. Cogan were inconsistent with the record and unsupported by objective medical 

evidence. Substantial evidence also supports the ALJ’s findings that the mental 

limitations assessed by Dr. Wheeler, Dr. Brown, Dr. Higgins, and Dr. Neims were 
3 

inconsistent with the record and with Norton’s activities. 

The ALJ provided specific, clear, and convincing reasons to discredit 

Norton’s testimony, including a lack of corroborating medical evidence and 

inconsistencies between Norton’s testimony and his activities. See id. at 1014–15

(citation omitted). Because the ALJ provided clear and convincing reasons to 

discredit Norton’s testimony, he did not err in rejecting the similar testimony of 

several lay witnesses based on “the same reasons.” Valentine v. Comm’r of Soc. 

Sec. Admin., 574 F.3d 685, 694 (9th Cir. 2009). 

AFFIRMED.
Clifton JONES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1216

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismisses this appeal.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Under Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as the
Principal Financial Officer of Energy Partners, Ltd. (the Company), that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Tiffany J. Thom                                                                       
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: May 4, 2011
R.B.H., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4931

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

_______________________________________

No. 00-10388

SUMMARY CALENDAR

_______________________________________

G DAVID WESTFALL FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; G. DAVID WESTFALL;

CHRISTINA WESTFALL; JOHN WESTFALL; STEFANI PODVIN; JOHN D.

PODVIN; Individually and as members of the limited partnership

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v.

TOMMY PARKS, ET AL, 

Defendants, 

JAMES JONES AND NAVARRO COUNTY, TEXAS, 

Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-3301-L)

_______________________________________

January 26, 2001

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, AND DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:1

The Westfall Family Limited Partnership owned a herd of

cattle kept on nine tracts of land in Ellis and Navarro Counties

in North Texas. In 1996, an official from the Society for the

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (“the SPCA”) reported to the

Ellis and Navarro County Sheriffs’` Departments that the Westfall

herd was being mistreated. The departments investigated the SPCA
official’s charge and, finding it to be well-founded, seized more

than 175 head of cattle and two donkeys owned by the Westfall

Family Limited Partnership. Appellants brought suit against the

counties and individual officials claiming violations of their

Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the United

States Constitution and violations of applicable state law. The

district court barred suit against appellee-Jones based on

qualified immunity and granted summary judgment in favor of

appellee-Navarro County based on a lack of policy or custom in

the county of seizing property pursuant to a warrant lacking

probable cause. This appeal followed. 

Having reviewed the record, the briefs, and the

recommendation of the magistrate as adopted by the district court

in its order, we agree that summary judgment in favor of

appellees was appropriate. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 4064

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MARLON PORTER, a/k/a Marlon McKoy, a/k/a Marlo , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Richard E. Myers, II , Chief District Judge. ( 7:20

- cr - 00029

- M

- 1 )

Submitted : April 14, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Marlon Porter, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolin a, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-4064 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Marlon Porter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part his four pretrial motions to suppress in his ongoing criminal pro ceedings . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp ., 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The ord er Porter seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre sented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-4064 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mntteb**$>tate~** 

# Qtourtof**~peaI~** 

# for tbe jf 

# eberaI Qttrcutt
YOLANDA S. GEIREN, Petitioner, 

### v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

2011·3163 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Boardin case no. CH0752100958-I-1. ONMOTION

ORDER Yolanda S. Geiren moves for leave to proceed in forma paupens. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.GEIREN v. USPS 

## JUL 21 2011 Date
cc: Yolanda S. Geiren Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq. s21 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2



### FILED II.S. COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT



## .JUl 27 2011

JAN 

### HORBAlY CLERK
Donald J. SCHUTZ, Esquire, and Schutz Litigation, LLC, Appellants, v. Harry SHEVIN, Michael Brevda, and Domnick & Shevin, P.L., Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4600

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
of the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Hedges, Controller and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008                        
|                                          
|/s/ David A. Hedges                       
|David A. Hedges                           
|VP, Controller and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADDED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas J. Bisko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.





Date: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Thomas J. BiskoThomas J. BiskoChief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 28, 2018

NO. 03-17-00119-CV

Bryan L. Gano, Appellant

v.

Dimas Diaz and Tracy Diaz, Appellees

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 30, 2016. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# Official Journal C 140/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 140 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 579 May 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 140

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 579 May 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 140/01 | Communication from the Commission on copyright protection of the common face design of the euro coins: updated list of designated authorities | 1 |
| 2014/C 140/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7227 — Temasek/Olam International) (1) | 3 |
| 2014/C 140/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7199 — Nestlé/Galderma) (1) | 4 |
| 2014/C 140/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7180 — Agrifirm/BayWa/Agrimec JV) (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 140/01

Communication from the Commission on copyright protection of the common face design of the euro coins: updated list of designated authorities

1

2014/C 140/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7227 — Temasek/Olam International) (1)

3

2014/C 140/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7199 — Nestlé/Galderma) (1)

4

2014/C 140/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7180 — Agrifirm/BayWa/Agrimec JV) (1)

5

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 140/05 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |
| 2014/C 140/06 | Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 140/05

Euro exchange rates

6

2014/C 140/06

Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Topics in Developmental, Cellular and Molecular Biology.                    

*Date:*                         April 20, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sherry L. Dupere, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5136, MSC 7843, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1021,                         *duperes@csr.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 6, 2009.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-8217 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Butte Highland Mining Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A Hatfield, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 5, 2010

| | By:   /s/ Paul A. Hatfield
_____________________________
Paul A. Hatfield
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
Principal Executive and Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.