alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16034-16035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending March 28, 
2009

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, 
as amended (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0073.
    Date Filed: March 23, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC1 Caribbean, Longhaul, Within South America Flex Fares

[[Page 16035]]

Package--Resolutions (Memo 0391). Intended effective date: 1 July 2009.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E9-7962 Filed 4-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 18, 2017, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. (“PXI Systems”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co KG, Munchen, GERMANY, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PXI Systems intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 26, 2017. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 17, 2017 (82 FR 48255).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-01062 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7352]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7834]

Notice of U.S. Hosting of 2012-2013 United States-Mexico 
Binational Bridges and Border Crossings Meetings; Executive Order 
11423, as Amended

AGENCY: Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs; Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State hereby gives notice that the United 
States will host the 2012 series of U.S.-Mexico Binational Bridges and 
Border Crossings Meetings. The United States has not yet determined the 
actual dates and locations of the meetings, but expects to host one in 
summer 2012 and one in the fall/winter 2012, with a plenary session in 
early 2013. These binational meetings will typically include an open 
session for those members of the public who are registered to attend 
the event. The Department of State welcomes public participation in the 
public sessions. To request notification of the dates and locations of 
upcoming meetings, please provide your name and email address to the 
Office of Mexican Affairs' Border Affairs Unit via email at WHA-BorderAffairs@state.gov or by mail at WHA/MEX--Room 3908, U.S. 
Department of State, 2201 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20520.

DATES: There is no deadline. Requests to be notified will be accepted 
throughout the year.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Palazzolo of the Office of 
Mexican Affairs' Border Affairs Unit at 202-647-1202 or via email at 
WH-BorderAffairs@state.gov.

    Dated: March 21, 2012.
Colleen Hoey,
Acting Director, Office of Mexican Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-7352 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 111 

AN ACT 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rulemaking, 

to include a link to a 100-word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 111 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account3 ability Through Transparency Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100-WORD SUMMARY TO 

5 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

6 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

9 end; 

10 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(4) the Internet address of a summary of not 

15 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

16 in plain language, that shall be posted on the Inter17 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern18 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

19 known as regulations.gov).’’. 

Passed the Senate June 22, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 111 

AN ACT 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a 

language summary of the proposed rule. rulemaking, to include a link to a 100-word plain
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15760-15761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7737]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,020]


Asteel Flash, Inc., Fremont, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on January 29, 2009 in response 
to a petition filed by a California State Workforce Office 
representative on behalf of workers of Asteel Flash, Inc., Fremont, 
California.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 15761]]


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 20th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-7737 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Cary AUSTIN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2018

Cary Austin, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*448The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Patrick Jay BANKS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2306

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (No. 333-137033 and No. 333-149844) on Form S-8 ofInnovative Card Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 31,2008  relating to our audit of theconsolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSBof Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2007.

 

Our report datedMarch 31, 2008 includes an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertaintyas to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

 

/s/ SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

 

Los Angeles, California

March 31, 2008

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Brian D. Lawrence, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Winland Electronics, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 10, 2006 /s/ Brian D. Lawrence  Chief Financial Officer
Dominic Alan DIMAIO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0089

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2018

Dominic Alan DiMaio, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See**Logan v. State* , 846 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2003).

Rowe, Ray, and Makar, JJ., concur.
STATE EX REL. Huey RANDOLPH v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2170

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Thomas* , 08-2912 (La. 10/16/09), 19 So.3d 466 ; *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. As to his remaining claim, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, *498unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
#### In re: Clifton HARRIS, Petitioner.

No. 04-6241.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 19, 2004.

Decided: May 26, 2004.

Clifton Harris, Petitioner pro se.

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Clifton Harris petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to stay his federal habeas corpus petition. That motion was filed in the district court in November 2003, and was supported by additional pleadings in January 2004. He seeks an order from this court directing *447the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Harris’s motion to appoint counsel and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
STATE of Louisiana v. Sherrod BRUMFIELD

NO. 2016-KP-2116

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**CHRISTIAN RASH,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 95 WM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application f or Leave to File** 

**Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Co rpus are**  DISMISSED

**.** See

Commonwealth v. Reid **, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid r epresentation** 

**is not permitted).**

**The Prothonotary is** DIRECTED **to forward the filings to counsel of record.**
# CA2005034EN.01000101.xml

| 9.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 34/1

---

NOTICE TO READER

Image

---
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raakel S. Iskanius, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Great Panther Resources
      Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Great Panther Resources Inc.                                                               

Dated: March 18, 2009

| | /s/ Raakel S.
Iskanius                          
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | Raakel S. Iskanius                              
| | Chief Financial Officer                         
| | (Principal Financial Officer and
      Principal
| | Accounting Officer)                             
| | Great Panther Resources Limited                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Great Panther
Resources Inc. and will be retained by Great Panther Resources Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EX PARTE Trebell MCCALL

1151306 (CR-15-0685)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - 22 CFR Part 127
          - [Public Notice 10273]
          - RIN 1400-AE50

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correcting amendment.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of State published a final rule in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 3, 2018, providing revised civil monetary penalties for 2018. This document corrects one of the civil monetary penalties.                    

# DATES:

This rule is effective on January 19, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alice Kottmyer, Office of the Legal Adviser, 202-647-2318.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Need for Correction

                    In FR Doc 2017-28395, in the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 3, 2018 (83 FR 234), on page 237, in the first column, amendatory instruction 6b, for § 127.10(a)(1)(ii) revised the penalty to read “$808,458”, but it should have read “$824,959, or five times the amount of the prohibited incentive payment, whichever is greater”.                

Accordingly, this document corrects the civil monetary penalty listed in 22 CFR 127.10(a)(1)(ii).

# List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 127

      - Arms and munitions
      - Exports

For the reasons set forth above, 22 CFR part 127 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment:

# PART 127—VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES

1. The authority citation for part 127 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Sections 2, 38, and 42, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2791); 22 U.S.C. 401; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2779a; 22 U.S.C. 2780; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129; Pub. L. 114-74, 129 Stat. 584.

§ 127.10

2. Section 127.10(a)(1)(ii) is amended by removing “$824,959” and adding in its place “$824,959, or five times the amount of the prohibited incentive payment, whichever is greater”. 

Alice M. Kottmyer,

Attorney-Adviser, Office of Management, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-00881 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
Document

EXHIBIT 10(f)(14)





Management Incentive Plan for 2021 (2021 MIP)
Under the 2021 MIP, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive performance related annual cash payments. Payments are, in general, only made if performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) are met.
The Committee previously approved incentive opportunities for 2021, expressed as a percentage of base salary for each participating officer. The Committee also established overall threshold, target and maximum performance metrics and payout ranges for the 2021 MIP. Financial performance measures and weightings were: Absolute Revenue (unadjusted for currency) (weighted at one-third), Adjusted Operating Margin (weighted at one-third) and Free Cash Flow (weighted at one-third). Additionally, the Committee established an Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) payout modifier that allowed the otherwise applicable performance-based payout to be increased or decreased by up to 10% of target, with the result not to exceed 200% of target. The Committee maintains the authority to increase or decrease an award based on individual performance. 
The performance against the 2021 MIP goals was as follows: Absolute Revenue and Adjusted Operating Margin were below threshold, Free Cash Flow was between target and maximum, and the ESG payout modifier increased the overall payout by 7.5% of target.