alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QNB Corp. (the
"Company for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas J. Bisko, President and CEO,
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

         2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


Date:    November 12, 2004                          By: /s/ Thomas J. Bisko
         -----------------                             ---------------------
                                                       Thomas J. Bisko
                                                       President and CEO

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provide to QNB Corp. and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.0

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his or her capacity as an officer
of Energy Partners, Ltd. (the "Company"), that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.

These certifications shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Energy Partners, Ltd. and will be
retained by Energy Partners, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Richard A. Bachmann
-------------------------------------
Richard A. Bachmann
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 10, 2005


/s/ David R. Looney
-------------------------------------
David R. Looney
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 10, 2005
EX PARTE Bryan Douglas CANNON

1151217 (CR-14-1352)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 14, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
AFS-11-269-E 

June 01, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10279 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2005-20708 

Capt. William Yeager 

Vice President Flight Operations 

World Airways, Inc. 

101 World Drive 

Peachtree City, GA 30269 

Dear Capt. Yeager: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8547, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 5, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of World Airways, Inc. (WA), for an extension of Exemption No. 8547, as amended. 

That exemption from §§ 121.665 and 121.697(a)(1), (b), and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows WA to substitute a computer application signature for the signed load 

manifest required by these sections. That exemption, however, expired on April 30, 2011; 

therefore, we will treat your request as a new petition. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to WA. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 8547 (copy enclosed), the FAA 
 2

found that the automatic weight-and-balance system enhanced both the efficiency and the 

accuracy of loading the petitioner’s aircraft without it adversely affecting air safety and is, 

therefore, in the public interest. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 8547; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 8547 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8547 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

David Gillion 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
Kenny MITCHELL, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2908

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

Kenny Mitchell, III, Bonifay, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kenny Mitchell, III, appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant's motion made four claims of ineffective assistance of counsel below. We find that the record does not conclusively refute Appellant's first claim, but otherwise affirm.

In his first claim, Appellant alleged that his counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate four alibi witnesses, his time card, and video surveillance-all of which he claims would have established that he was at work at the time the crime was committed. The trial court summarily denied this claim finding that Appellant's counsel filed a disclosure of three of the four alibi witnesses before trial and filed a notice of intent to introduce employment records. According to the trial court, this demonstrated that Appellant's counsel did in fact investigate the alibi, and therefore the court concluded that the record conclusively refuted Appellant's claims.

We review the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion de novo. *Lebron v. State* , 100 So.3d 132, 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). The trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing unless the allegations are facially insufficient, are conclusively refuted by the record, or are legally insufficient. *Id.*

While counsel's apparent intent to call three of the four alibi witnesses and use at *412least some employment records at trial may be relevant, we cannot conclude that this alone conclusively refutes Appellant's entire claim. We therefore reverse the summary denial as to this claim, and remand for the trial court to attach record evidence conclusively refuting Appellant's claim, or to hold an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY AND EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

January 12, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

## Agenda 

Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board Member Meeting, Telephonic.

# STATUS: 

Closed to the public.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(9)(B).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Dated: January 11, 2018.

Dharmesh Vashee,

Deputy General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-00706 Filed 1-11-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CURTIS Le’BARRON GRAY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

WAYNE ULIT, Medical Physician at CSP

Corcoran; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-16119

D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00357-LJO-GSA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2013** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Curtis Le’Barron Gray appeals pro se from the

district court’s dismissal order and summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

FILED

JAN 17 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-16119

action alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,

1056 (9th Cir. 2004) (summary judgment); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447

(9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v. Harrington, 152

F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)). 

We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the claim against the appeals

coordinator because Gray did not allege facts showing that the coordinator was

deliberately indifferent to Gray’s medical needs when determining that emergency

processing of his grievance was not warranted. See Toguchi, 391 F.3d 1058-59 (a

prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and

disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health and safety; negligence is

insufficient to establish deliberate indifference).

The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Dr. Ulit

because Gray failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the

delay in treatment of his retinal tear was harmful or led to further injury. See

Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002) (delay of medical treatment

does not constitute deliberate indifference unless delay led to further injury).

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seitel, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marcia H. Kendrick, Principal Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 14, 2003/s/ Marcia H. KendrickMarcia H. Kendrick
Principal Financial Officer






---
L.J., the Mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1939

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-006-CV

EX PARTE S.R.D., A CHILD

----------

	NO. 2-06-155-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.G.D. A/K/A S.R.D., A CHILD

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WICHITA COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellants’ “Motion To Dismiss.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  October 5, 2006
Michael Todd SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4585

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 4, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jonathan Goodman HALL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Esmeralda Islam BRAHIMAJ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2597

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 05, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document

Exhibit 10.17








									
	NEXTERA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP


COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR INDEPENDENT NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR OF
NEXTERA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP


(Effective January 1, 2022)



	Annual Retainer
    (payable quarterly)
		$82,500
			
	Committee Chair retainer (annual)
    (payable quarterly)
		$15,000
			
	Annual grant of restricted common units
     (under 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan)
		That number of common units determined by dividing $142,500 by closing price of NextEra Energy Partners, LP common units on effective date of grant (rounded up to the nearest 10 common units)

			
	Miscellaneous
		Travel and Accident Insurance (including spouse coverage)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLORV00000-L10200000.DD0000; HAG 9-0138]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council (JDSRAC) will meet as indicated below:

# DATES:

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. (Pacific Daylight Time) on April 14, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

The Council will meet by teleconference. For a copy of material to be discussed or the conference call number, please contact the Vale District; information below.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Wilkening, Public Affairs Officer, Vale District Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, Oregon 97918, (541) 473-6218.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The JDSRAC will conduct a public meeting by teleconference to discuss and come to consensus on contents of a letter to be sent to the Wallowa-Whitman Forest Supervisor on the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Draft EIS for Invasive Plants Treatment Project. The meeting is open for the public to call in. Public comment is scheduled from 7:45 p.m. to 8 p.m. (Pacific Daylight Time) April 14, 2009. For a copy of the information distributed to the Council members or the call in number for the teleconference, please contact Mark Wilkening.

Dated: March 31, 2009.

David R. Henderson,

District Manager, Vale District Office.

[FR Doc. E9-7656 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00613]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act a meeting of the Geriatrics and 
Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held on May 16-17, 2018 at the 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC. 
On May 16th, the session will be held in Room 630 and begin at 1:00 
p.m. and end at 5 p.m. On May 17th, the session will be held in Room 
830 and begin at 8 a.m. and end at 4:30 p.m. This meeting is open to 
the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of VA and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters pertaining to 
geriatrics and gerontology. The Committee assesses the capability of VA 
health care facilities and programs to meet the medical, psychological, 
and social needs of older Veterans and evaluates VA programs designated 
as Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.
    The meeting will feature presentations and discussions on VA's 
geriatrics and extended care programs, aging research activities, 
updates on VA's employee staff working in the area of geriatrics (to 
include training, recruitment and retention approaches), Veterans 
Health Administration (VHA) strategic planning activities in geriatrics 
and extended care, recent VHA efforts regarding dementia and program 
advances in palliative care, and performance and oversight of VA 
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide 
written comments for review by the Committee to Mrs. Alejandra 
Paulovich, Program Analyst, Geriatrics and Extended Care (10NC4), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20420, or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0948656c6368676d7b682759687c65667f606a61497f68276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7839141d1219161c0a195628190d14170e111b10380e19561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>. Individuals who wish 
to attend the meeting should contact Mrs. Paulovich at (202) 461-6016.

    Dated: January 10, 2018.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-00613 Filed 1-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Jay BARRINGER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1116 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1116

   To prohibit firearms dealers from selling a firearm prior to the 
                   completion of a background check.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2023

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Coons, Mr. 
 Whitehouse, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Casey, Mr. Menendez, 
  Mr. Kaine, Ms. Warren, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Markey, Mr. Padilla, Ms. 
Hirono, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Brown, 
  Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Booker, and Ms. Baldwin) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit firearms dealers from selling a firearm prior to the 
                   completion of a background check.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Background Check Completion Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. COMPLETION OF BACKGROUND CHECKS.

    (a) In General.--Section 922(t)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``(i)'';
                    (B) by striking ``or'' and inserting ``and''; and
                    (C) by striking clause (ii);
            (2) by striking subparagraph (C); and
            (3) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 12001(a)(3) of the Bipartisan Safer Communities 
        Act (Public Law 117-159; 136 Stat. 1324) is amended by striking 
        ``paragraphs (1)(B) and (2) are repealed, and the provisions of 
        law amended by those paragraphs are restored as if those 
        paragraphs had not been enacted'' and inserting ``paragraph (2) 
        is repealed, and the provision of law amendment by that 
        paragraph is restored as if that paragraph had not been 
        enacted''.
            (2) Section 103(l)(3) of the Brady Handgun Violence 
        Prevention Act (34 U.S.C. 40901(l)(3)) is amended by striking 
        ``, but in no case more than 10 business days,''.
                                 <all>
```