alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Christopher MYLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1238

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONI, Daniel D. Viren, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.G. Barry Corporation for thequarterly period ended September 29, 2007;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [Reserved]c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 13, 2007 /s/ Daniel D. Viren     Printed Name: Daniel D. Viren  Title: Senior Vice President – Finance, Chief  Financial Officer and Secretary  (Principal Financial Officer)
25
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15370; OREGON Disaster Number OR-00088 Declaration of Economic Injury]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declaration of a disaster for the State of Oregon dated 10/31/2017.

*Incident:*                         Eagle Creek Fire.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/02/2017 through 11/30/2017.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 01/11/2018.

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/31/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an Administrative declaration for the State of Oregon, dated 10/31/2017, is hereby amended to establish the incident closing date as 11/30/2017.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

      ( print page 3047)    
Dated: January 11, 2018.

Linda E. McMahon,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2018-01044 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MHI Hospitality Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew M. Sims, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date: March 25, 2009



By:

/s/    ANDREW M.
SIMSName:

Andrew M. SimsTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
Charge Questions

AHETF Study Proposal: Mixing, Loading and Applying Pesticides in Managed Horticultural Facilities using Powered Handgun Equipment (AHE600)

If the AHETF study proposal AHE600 is revised as suggested in EPA’s review and if the research is performed as described:

1. Is the research likely to genera te scientifically reliable data, useful for assessing the exposure of workers mixing, loading, and applying pesticid es in managed horticultural facilities using powered handgun equipment?

2. Is the research likely to meet the applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 26, subparts K and

L?
Cory ASHLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3495

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under

EO12866/13563	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

**Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) : Final Rule**  **Data Requirements Rule**  **for the 2010**  **1 -**  **Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2**  **) Primary National**

**Am bient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)** 

**RIN 2060 -**  **AR19**
**General Comments** 1. Reviewer recommends providing the marginal benefits and costs to choosing the 2,000 tpy (both inside and outside the 1m population area) over the other options provided within the proposed rule. Specificall y, provide the cost per ton of each option, inclu ding 1,000 tpy /2,000 tpy ; 2,000 tpy

/5,000 tpy ; 3,000 tpy

(both within and outside the 1m population area); 3,000 tpy /10,000 tpy ; and 5,000 tpy (both within and outside the 1m population area). 2. Reviewer recommends clarifying why a preliminary

list of source areas is required to be submitted instead of allowing states to provide a preliminary list of source areas if the state believes that would ensure that they met the required deadlines, especially since EPA states they

are consulting with air agencies regarding the source areas that the final rule will characterize. 3. Reviewer recommends clarifying federall y enforceable requirements that limit source emissions to less than 2,000 t py . 4. Reviewer recommends clarifying how compounding multiple sources for modeli ng is treated to ensure that an overly conservative model is not developed. 5. Reviewer recommends providing additional clarification whether the use of dispersion modeling is appropriate for attainment or nonattainment designations. **Specific Comments** 1. Pag e 7. Reviewer recommends modifying the sentence below to more strongl y convey that the approach shall not be used for other NAAQS pollutants. a. “. . . EPA believes that the approach set forth in this rule directing air agencies to gather additional data to c haracterize ambient air in the vicinity of larger SO2 sources is uniquel y suited for implementation of the 1

- hour SO2 NAAQS, and the Agency does not currently

anticipate it to be used for other NAAQS pollutants.” 2. Page 22

- 2 3. Reviewer recommends modifying the two sentences that start with “L ikewise here, the EPA is not y et . . .” to state: a. “L ikewise here, the EPA is not y et taking an y action to apply modeling regarding any decision of whether an area is or is not meeting th e NAAQS. In an y event, we note that . . .” 3. P age 65

- 6 7. Reviewer recommends clarify ing EPA’s response to comments on EPA’s legal authority

to review modeling procedures that could affect compliance with regulatory

requirements. Also, please discuss, if appropriate, whether an y commitments or “presumptive acceptance” based on a reasonable time

- frame that would allow states to comply with EPA regulations should be included.

### Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under

EO12866/13563	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review. **Typographical Comments** 1. Reviewer recommends removing “or not” whenever “whether or not” is stated within the document.
#### Vladimir SOROKA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-55529.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 19, 2004.

Terri A. Law, Esq., Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Vladimir Soroka, Calipatria, CA, pro se.

Michael C. Keller, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California prisoner Vladimir Soroka appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review *de novo, Corjasso v. Ayers,*278 F.3d 874, 877 (9th Cir.2002), and we vacate and remand.

Soroka contends that the district court erred by dismissing his petition as untimely. Soroka argues that he may be entitled to equitable tolling because his appellate counsel did not file a habeas petition she agreed to file. We agree.

To demonstrate grounds for equitable tolling, a petitioner must show that extraordinary circumstances beyond his control prevented him from filing his petition on time. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244; *Miles v. Prunty,*187 F.3d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir.1999). An attorney’s negligence generally does not constitute extraordinary circumstances sufficient to warrant equitable tolling. *See Frye v. Hickman,*273 F.3d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir.2001). In this case, however, the failures of Soroka’s attorney may be sufficiently egregious to justify equitable tolling. *See Spitsyn v. Moore,*345 F.3d 796, 801-02 (9th Cir.2003).

The case is remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing to consider the attorney’s negligence and Soroka’s diligence in ultimately filing his petition. *See id.*

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-36;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. Lamale
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Pursuant to Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Gary D. Woerz, President and CFO
of International American Technologies, Inc, a Nevada corporation, hereby makes the
following certification as required by Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
with respect to the following of this annual report filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2006.

The undersigned certifies that the above annual
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and information contained in the above annual report fairly presents, in all
respects, the financial condition of International American Technologies, Inc. and results
of its operations.

Date: April 28, 2006
Gary D. Woerz
Chief Financial Officer and President/s/ Gary D. Woerz
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 51803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20437]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8431]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Vasily Kandinsky: From Blaue Reiter to the Bauhaus, 
1910-1925''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Vasily Kandinsky: From Blaue Reiter to the 
Bauhaus, 1910-1925,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Neue Galerie in New York, New York from on or 
about October 3, 2013, until on or about February 10, 2014, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 14, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-20437 Filed 8-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Peter HELIE, Timothy Haviland, Ned Lipes, Phil Litowitz, and Greg Smith, each individually and in a derivative capacity as shareholders of and on behalf of Old Palm Golf Club, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, Appellants, v. OLD PALM HOLDINGS L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, CDVII Old Palm LLC, a Delaware Limited Partnership, Clarion Development Ventures, III L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, Clarion Development III, LLC, a Delaware Limited Partnership, Clarion Partners LLC, a New York Limited Partnership, Triton Atlantic Partners, LLC, a Delaware Limited Partnership, James D. Motta, Gary Walker, Leslie Snavely, and Old Palm Golf Club, Inc. Appellees.

No. 4D17-2317

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16897-16898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,929]


Pfizer Global Manufacturing, a Subsidiary of Pfizer Inc., Terre 
Haute, IN; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 22, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of the workers of Pfizer Global Manufacturing, 
a subsidiary of Pfizer, Terre Haute, Indiana.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 16898]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of March 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-8274 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/      Emory O. Berry                                                    |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Emory      O. Berry                                                        |
|   |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of    Operations |
|   |   | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer)                           |

----
Charles VAUGHN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2337

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 ACCOMPANYING ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F REPORT OF WESTERN FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                     (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. S. 1350)


      In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the annual report of Western
Forest Products Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Reynold Hert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: as of January 3, 2006.



                                         /s/ Reynold Hert
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Reynold Hert
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Western Forest Products Inc.