alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ielement8k122807ex3.htm


    Release
      of Consulting
      Agreement

    


    Pursuant
      to the certain Stock Purchase
      Agreement by and between IElement Corporation (“Seller”) and Ivan Zweig
      (“Buyer”) and for
      limited purposes IElement Inc. dated as of December __, 2007, the parties have
      agreed to release each other from any and all liability under that certain
      Consulting Agreement between the Seller and Kramerica Capital Corporation
      (“Kramerica”) dated
      January 1, 2007 as disclosed in the Seller’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
      April 20, 2007 (the “Consulting
      Agreement”).  Buyer owns 100% of the equity of Kramerica
      Capital Corporation.  The terms of the release are set forth
      herein.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the
      covenants and agreements contained in the said letter:

    


    1.  The
      parties hereby
      release and forever discharge each other of and from all manner of action and
      actions, cause and causes of action, suits, rights, debts, dues, sums of money,
      accounts, bonds, bills, covenants, contracts, controversies, omissions,
      agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages, liabilities, judgments,
      executions, claims and demands whatsoever (collectively, "Claims"), in law or in equity,
      which either party ever had, now has or which it hereafter can, shall or may
      have, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, matured or unmatured,
      fixed or contingent, for, upon or by reason of any matter or cause arising
      at
      any time on or prior to the date of this Release solely in connection with
      the
      Consulting Agreement.

    


    2.  The
      Consulting Agreement
      is hereby void and unenforceable.

    


    3.  This
      Release shall be
      governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas
      applicable to contracts made and to be performed wholly therein.

    


    The
      Parties have executed this Agreement on the day first above
      written.

    


    IElement
      Corporation:

    


    By:                                           
      

    Name:                                                      
      

    Title:                                                      
      

    


    


    Ivan
      Zweig

    


    Kramerica
      Capital Corporation:

    


    


    By:                                           
      

    Name:                                                      
      

    Title:
STATE EX REL. Gary JUENGAIN v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-2175

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

PER CURIAM:

*969Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Relator has now fully litigated his third application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in

2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
STATE EX REL. J.B. MOORE, III v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 17-KH-0060

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

*280Denied. Relator fails to show he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In addition, relator's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. Finally, relator fails to show that he pled guilty involuntarily and/or is entitled to an out-of-time appeal under *State v. Counterman* , 475 So.2d 336 (La.1985). La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in state collateral proceedings in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         2764086
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            4845
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2000000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    6240038
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        46780820
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          46316525
<LOANS>                                       90787518
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1444867
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               156243033
<DEPOSITS>                                   139297773
<SHORT-TERM>                                   3000000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1174203
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       2239775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    10409967
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               156243033
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6060659
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2366431
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     2
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               8427092
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2367909
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2476413
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5950679
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    80000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                1826
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5644231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1824024
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1824024
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1154579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.09
<LOANS-NON>                                    2434297
<LOANS-PAST>                                    133941
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1362404
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    26741
<RECOVERIES>                                     29204
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1444867
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1444867
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         316398
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 129

 To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States 
 against unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2023

Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Ms. Hirono, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Booker, Mr. 
Markey, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Warren, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Cortez 
Masto, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Coons, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Wyden, 
 Mr. Van Hollen, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Smith, Mr. Whitehouse, 
Mr. Reed, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Casey, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Welch, and Mr. Kaine) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States 
 against unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Korematsu-Takai Civil Liberties 
Protection Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNLAWFUL DETENTION.

    Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Prohibition on Detention Based on Protected 
Characteristics.--
            ``(1) Definition.--In this subsection, the term `protected 
        characteristic' includes each of the following:
                    ``(A) Race.
                    ``(B) Ethnicity.
                    ``(C) National origin.
                    ``(D) Religion.
                    ``(E) Sex.
                    ``(F) Gender identity.
                    ``(G) Sexual orientation.
                    ``(H) Disability.
                    ``(I) Any additional characteristic that the 
                Attorney General determines to be a protected 
                characteristic.
            ``(2) Prohibition.--No individual may be imprisoned or 
        otherwise detained based solely on an actual or perceived 
        protected characteristic of the individual.
            ``(3) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this subsection 
        shall be construed to allow the Attorney General to remove a 
        characteristic described in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of 
        paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15230 and #15231; Arizona Disaster Number AZ-00050]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Arizona dated 08/03/2017.

*Incident:*                         Post-fire Flooding from Monsoon Storms.                    

*Incident Period:*                         07/19/2017 through 09/30/2017.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 01/11/2018.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/02/2017.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/03/2018.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an Administrative declaration for the State of ARIZONA, dated 08/03/2017, is hereby amended to establish the incident closing date as 09/30/2017.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Dated: January 11, 2018.

Linda E. McMahon,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2018-01163 Filed 1-22-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 19, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00554

- CV

MO

- VAC COMPANY OF ALICE, Appellant

v.

MICHAEL MYANE LP d/b/a Pipeline Measurement Co., LP and Michael Myane Manage ment, LLC, Appellee s

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas
Trial Court No. 15

- 04

- 54479

- CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sonia Trevino’s Notification of Late Reporter’s Record is this date NOTED. Time is extended to November 13, 2018.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 19th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Order filed October 22, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00646-CV

____________

PATRICE BARNES, Appellant

V.

THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM AND 

PRAIRE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-10-21109

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed July 24, 2013. The clerk’s record 

was filed August 30, 2013. To date, our records show that the filing fee of $175.00 

has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been 

filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the 

Clerk of this court on or before November 4, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If 
2

appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Jesse LOOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D14-1245

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

**ON MOTION TO VACATE OPINION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION**

PER CURIAM.

*765We grant the appellant's motion to vacate opinion for lack of jurisdiction, vacate the prior per curiam affirmance issued on April 15, 2015, and issue the following opinion in its stead. *See* *Del Risco v. State*, 203 So.3d 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), *vacating for lack of jurisdiction*, 207 So.3d 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (unpublished table decision).

Before trial, the defendant filed a pro se Notice of Waiver of Counsel that the trial court subsequently denied after a *Faretta* hearing. *See* *Faretta v. California*, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). Specifically, the trial court found that the defendant was not competent to conduct his own defense at trial, and the defendant filed a pro se notice of appeal of that order. Counsel for the defendant was unaware of the appeal.

A criminal defendant generally does not have the right to an interlocutory appeal. *Lopez v. State*, 638 So.2d 931, 932 (Fla. 1994). The trial court's order at issue here "does not fall within any of the enumerated categories of appealable nonfinal orders found in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 or 9.140(b)." Accordingly, this Court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the defendant's interlocutory appeal. *See* *Baez v. State*, 985 So.2d 1223, 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; *see also* *Rentas v. State*, 133 So.3d 1117, 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ("[The defendant] is not entitled to nonfinal review of the trial court's ruling on the self-representation issue."). We therefore vacate our decision of April 15, 2015.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1057

     To require responsiveness testing of Defense Logistics Agency 
                       pharmaceutical contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2023

 Mr. Rubio (for himself and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require responsiveness testing of Defense Logistics Agency 
                       pharmaceutical contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Further Strengthening Supply Chains 
for Servicemembers and Security Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIVENESS TESTING OF DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY 
              PHARMACEUTICAL CONTRACTS.

    The Director of the Defense Logistics Agency shall modify Defense 
Logistics Agency Instructions 5025.03 and 3110.01--
            (1) to require Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support to 
        coordinate annually with customers in the military departments 
        to conduct responsiveness testing of the Defense Logistics 
        Agency's contingency contracts for pharmaceuticals; and
            (2) to include the results of that testing, as reported by 
        customers in the military departments, in the annual reports of 
        the Warstopper Program.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 67 (Thursday, April 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice to delete system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is deleting a system 
of records entitled ``National Veterans Museum Donation Records--VA'' 
(120VA047), which was established at 67 Fed. Reg. 58445, dated 
September 16, 2002. The system contained information on individuals 
making gifts and donations to VA for the National Veterans Museum. This 
system of records is being deleted because plans for the creation of 
the museum were postponed indefinitely.
    A ``Report of Intention to Publish a Federal Notice of Deletion of 
a System of Records'' and a copy of the deletion of system notice have 
been provided to the appropriate Congressional committees and to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) 
and guidelines issued by OMB, 65 FR 77677 (Dec. 12, 2000).

DATES: Effective Date: April 9, 2009

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Mulhern, Office of Financial 
Policy (047G), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-6487 (this is not a toll-free number).

    Approved: March 4, 2008.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
 [FR Doc. E9-8065 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLORV00000-L10200000.DD0000; HAG 9-0138]


Notice of Meeting, John Day/Snake Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, the U.S. Department of the Interior, 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) John Day/Snake Resource Advisory 
Council (JDSRAC) will meet as indicated below:

DATES: The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. (Pacific Daylight Time) on 
April 14, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The Council will meet by teleconference. For a copy of 
material to be discussed or the conference call number, please contact 
the Vale District; information below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Wilkening, Public Affairs 
Officer, Vale District Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, Oregon 97918, 
(541) 473-6218.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The JDSRAC will conduct a public meeting by 
teleconference to discuss and come to consensus on contents of a letter 
to be sent to the Wallowa-Whitman Forest Supervisor on the Wallowa-
Whitman National Forest Draft EIS for Invasive Plants Treatment 
Project. The meeting is open for the public to call in. Public comment 
is scheduled from 7:45 p.m. to 8 p.m. (Pacific Daylight Time) April 14, 
2009. For a copy of the information distributed to the Council members 
or the call in number for the teleconference, please contact Mark 
Wilkening.

    Dated: March 31, 2009.
David R. Henderson,
District Manager, Vale District Office.
[FR Doc. E9-7656 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P