alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Remon SHIELDS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-15182.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 14, 2004.

Remon Shields, Represa, CA, pro se.

Constance Picciano, Esq., Office Of The California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Remon Shields, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials’ failure to process his grievances denied him access to the courts. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Shields’ action because he failed to allege sufficient facts to indicate that any alleged failure to process his grievances resulted in actual injury. *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 353-55, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996). To the extent Shields attempted to state claims on the basis of the events underlying the grievances, the district court properly dismissed his action because he failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he had standing to bring those claims. *See id.*at 348-50, 116 S.Ct. 2174.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Shields’ motion for appointment of counsel because exceptional *165circumstances were not present in this case. *See Terrell v. Brewer,*935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
CAUSE NO. 05

- 15

- 01493

- CV
MICHAEL GAY COOK, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT
VS.

CAROLINE D. COOK , APPELLEE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TE X AS AT DALLAS

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REDUCE SUPERSEDEAS BOND
COMES NOW , Michael Gay Cook, Defendant in the above styled cause of action , which he, as appellant, has appealed to the 5 th District Court of Appeals , and files this motion pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 24 requesting the supersedeas bond be reduced, and would show unto this honorable Court the following
matte rs to wit:
1. Appellant is retired and has a set income of $1,048 per month. The Trial Court set the superedeas bond at $1800. This appeal rises from a forcible entry and detainer action over an oral lease agreement with a monthly rental of $300 per month paid in bimonthly installments of $150 each.
2. The amount of the supersedeas bond will cause the Appellant substantial economic harm. The Appellate Court has the power to review the excessiveness of the amount of a supersedeas bond. See In re: It’s The Ber ry’s. LLC , 12 -06-00298- CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 9146 (Tex App

- Tyler, October 25, 2006).
3. The Texas Supreme Court has established in Marshall v. Housing Authority of City of San Antonio , 198 SW3rd 782 (Tex 2006) th a t a tenant is not required to post a supersedeas bond in order to appeal a judgment of possession in an eviction case. WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that this motion be set for hearing and that upon hearing the Appellate Court will issue an order lowering the amount of the supersedeas bond to an amount that will not subject the Appellant to substantial economic harm. ACCEPTED 05-15-01493-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 12/10/2015 9:11:10 AM

LISA MATZ CLERKRespectfully submitted this the 1 0th day of Decem ber, 2015.
Kerry L. Prisock Kerry L. Prisock State Bar Number 24082005 Post Office Box 1051 Rockwall, Texas 75087 Telephone: 214

- 6 32

- 3823 Facsimile: 469

- 252

- 7496 kprisocklegal@sbcglobal.net A TTORNEY FOR APPELL ANTC ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served upon opposing counsel by electronic means. Kerry L. Prisock Kerry L. Prisock State Bar Number 24082005 Post Office Box 1051 Rockwall, Texas 75087 Telephone: 214

- 632

- 3823 Facsimile: 469

- 252

- 7496 kprisocklegal@sbcglobal.net A TTORNEY FOR APPELL ANT
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 16 March 2005

in Case T-283/02 EnBW Kernkraft GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(TACIS Programme - Services provided in connection with a nuclear power station in Ukraine - Not paid for - Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance - Action for compensation - Non-contractual liability)

(2005/C 132/44)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-283/02: EnBW Kernkraft GmbH, fomerly Gemeinschaftskernkraftwerk Neckar GmbH, established in Neckarwestheim (Germany), represented by S. Zickgraf, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: S. Fries and F. Hoffmeister, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for compensation under Article 288 EC in respect of damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following failure by the Commission to pay for the services provided by it under the TACIS programme in relation to the Zaporozhe nuclear power station (Ukraine) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and V. Vadapalas, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 March 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.

----
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Judy E. Naus, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Biotel Inc.;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:


(a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
        The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors:


(a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.


Date:   September 26, 2007

/s/   Judy E. NausJudy E. NausChief Financial Officer






---
# Official Journal L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 66 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 618 March 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 66

English edition

Legislation

Volume 618 March 2018

---

| Contents | | Corrigenda | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulations (EC) No 2006/2004 and (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC ( OJ L 60 I, 2.3.2018 ) | 1 |

Contents

Corrigenda

page

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulations (EC) No 2006/2004 and (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC ( OJ L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

( OJ L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

Corrigenda

| 8.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/1

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulations (EC) No 2006/2004 and (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 60 I of 2 March 2018
  )

On page 14, in the concluding formula:

for:

‘
  For the European Parliament

The President

L. PAVLOVA

For the Council

The President

A. TAJANI
  ’,

read:

‘
  For the European Parliament

The President

A. TAJANI

For the Council

The President

L. PAVLOVA
  ’.

---
Ronald MCKEEHAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3520

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Benjamin R. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and State of Florida, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, February 12, 2018 and Tuesday, 
February 13, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be held Monday, February 12, 
2018, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Mountain Time and Tuesday, February 
13, 2018, from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Mountain Time at the IRS 
Office in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact 
Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 
1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact 
us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include 
various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 10, 2018.
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-00732 Filed 1-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00905]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:00 a.m. on 
Tuesday, January 16, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig, seconded by Director Mick Mulvaney (Acting 
Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), and concurred in by 
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that Corporation business required its 
consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this 
meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier 
notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not 
require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public 
observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed 
meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' 
(5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii) and (c)(9)(B).

    Dated: January 16, 2018.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00905 Filed 1-16-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00956]



[[Page 2962]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee: Notice 
of Open Meeting

    The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee 
(SITAC) will meet on January 30, 2018, 9:30 a.m., (Pacific Standard 
Time) at the SPIE Photonics West, in San Francisco, CA at the 
InterContinental on 888 Howard Street, a block from the Moscone Center 
in Ballroom A. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Export Administration on technical questions that affect 
the level of export controls applicable to sensors and instrumentation 
equipment and technology.

Agenda

Public Session

    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Summary of Licensing Statistics.
    3. Remarks from the Bureau of Industry and Security Management.
    4. Industry Presentations.
    5. New Business.
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e27081b0a0a1b502d0e0c1710191b0c3e1c170d501a111d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc95baa9b8b8a9e29fbcbea5a2aba9be8caea5bfe2a8a3afe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a> no later than January 23, 2018.
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to 
the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time 
before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of 
public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee 
suggests that the materials be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. 
Springer.
    For more information contact Yvette Springer on (202) 482-2813.

Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-00956 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX PARTE Ronald Odell KING

1160072 (CR-15-0306)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 9, 2016

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of PRB GasTransportation, Inc. (“PRB”), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report ofPRB on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of PRB. This written statement is being furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signedoriginal of this statement has been provided to PRB and will be retained by PRBand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

Date: April 13, 2006

| /s/ ROBERT W. WRIGHT                                                               |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert W. Wright  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)   |   |
| /s/ WILLIAM P. BRAND, JR.                                                          |   |
| William P.  Brand, Jr.  Vice President—Finance  (Principal Financial Officer) |   |

 

----
Date: August 6, 2015 TO: EPA and DOT SUBJECT: Proposed Green House Gas (GHG) and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy
DutyTrucks
--Comments Thank you for holding this hearing on the "Proposed GHG and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy-DutyTrucks." As stated in the EPA's name, your agency is a critical part ofourworldtoday with our complicated environment. I am here for myselfand others like me who need these improved standards. I am a breastcancer survivor. After mydiagnosis in 2007, I knowvery well how important life is and ourtime here. I have tried to live with as many healthy habits as I can. As my parents taught me, I don'tsmoke, or drink, and have never used drugs. I worked for the Social Security Administration until 5 years ago. I have 2 sisters that have never had any type of cancer. One major difference between them and me is where we live. I have always lived in Cook County, which has air grade of "F" per the American Lung Association. One sister lives in Albuquerque, which is grade "B", and the other lives in Pittsburgh, which is grade "D." We can't all move to Albuquerque. One current fact ofBreast cancer is that I am one ofalmost 3 million breast cancer survivors alive in the U.S. today per the National Cancer Institute. We are the largestgroup ofcancer survivors in the country. Nearly everyone in this room probably knows someone who is a survivor. That is the good news. On the other side, Iwill always have side effects from mysuccessful treatments. Because my immune system has been compromised, I am more sensitive to air and other environmental problems, such as air pollution. As medical science continually improves treatment, even more people will survive breast cancer and will need improved air quality. The Clean Air Act requires the EPAto list categories ofthe sources that "cause or contribute significantly to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health orwelfare." As the Supreme Court ruled in 2007, the GHGs (green house gases) meetthe definition of "air pollutant. I hope thatthese fuel efficiency standard continue the work thatyou are doing to reduce the carbon emissions and numerous other air pollutants that are in our atmosphere. Ivery strongly hope thatyou will establish these Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy
-DutyTrucks. In conclusion, I can be very careful about what I eat and drink, but it is much more difficulttowatch whattype ofair I breathe.

Above notes prepared by: Patricia Walter, (Residence, Glenview, Illinois)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Robert MORRISON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-10147.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 18, 2004.

Peter S. Sexton, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*186Alex Gonzalez, Gonzalez & Smith, Mesa, AZ, Alex D. Gonzalez, Tempe, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Robert Morrison appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 16-month sentence for one count of failure to pay child support, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 228(a)(3). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Morrison has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Morrison has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.