alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. NJ18-9-000]

Take notice that on December 29, 2017, Buckeye Power, Inc. submitted its tariff filing: Buckeye Revised Rate Schedule Filing to be effective 12/29/2017.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 19, 2018.                

Dated: January 12, 2018..

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-01017 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Docket No: FAA-2015-8467 Dir ID: 2014-NM-107-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 5/21/14

Regional Airline Association 5/21/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 5/21/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 5/21/14
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Kaare G. Foy, Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Great Panther Resources Limited, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the annual report on Form 20-F of Great Panther Resources Limited for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Great Panther Resources Limited. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date:  June 30, 2006.

/s/ Kaare G. Foy                                        

Kaare G. Foy

Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Blue Earth Refineries Inc. and will be retained by Blue Earth Refineries Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ST. ELIZABETH GARDENS, LTD., Appellant, v. FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, Respondent/Appellee, and Isles of Pahokee Phase II, LLC; Haley Sofge Preservation Phase One; Three Round Tower A, LLC; Cathedral Towers, Ltd; and SP Manor, LLC, Intervenors/Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D16-5326

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Lakeside Mortgage Fund, LLC (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William F. Webster, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lakeside
Financial Group, Inc., the Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:   March 29, 2006                          /S/ William F. Webster
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               William F. Webster,
                                               President of Manager
                                               Lakeside Financial Group, Inc.
Exhibit
10.105


 


INVESTVIEW,
INC.


 


JOINDER
TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


 


The
undersigned has executed this Joinder as of the date set forth below, in order to join as a party to that certain Lock-Up Agreement dated
as of March 22, 2021 (the “Agreement”), a copy of which is attached hereto, by and among Investview, Inc. (the
“Company”), Investview Financial Group Holdings, LLC, and the “Purchasers” (as such
term is defined in the Agreement) of the Company. Intending to be legally bound hereby, the undersigned agrees that the undersigned,
shall become a party to, and be bound in all respects by, the Agreement, with respect to all shares of common stock of the Company beneficially
held by such undersigned.


 


	Date:	February
    21, 2022	/s/
    Myles P. Gill
	 	 	Myles
    P. Gill


 


ACKNOWLEDGED,
ACCEPTED


AND
AGREED:


 


	Investview,
    Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    James R. Bell	 
	Name:	James R. Bell	 
	Title:	President
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Overthe Servicing and Preparation of Monthly Servicer’s Certificates

 

January 14, 2005

 

The management of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. (the “Company”) isresponsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control overthe servicing requirements identified  inArticle V, and the reporting requirements identified in Article IX ofthe Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Servicing Agreement”), dated as of August 1,2004 between Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2004-3, as Issuer,Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., as Trust Depositor, Harley-DavidsonCredit Corp., as Servicer and BNY Midwest Trust Company as Indenture Trusteefor the year ended December 31, 2004. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, weconducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over theservicing of motorcycle loan contracts in accordance with Article V of theServicing Agreement (the “servicing requirements”) and the preparation ofmonthly Servicer’s Certificates in accordance with Article IX of theServicing Agreement (the “reporting requirements”) based on the framework in “InternalControl-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of SponsoringOrganizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under theframework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, our management concludedthat our internal control over the servicing requirements and reportingrequirements was effective as of December 31, 2004.  Our management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of our internal control over the servicing requirements andreporting requirements as of December 31, 2004 has been examined by Ernst &Young LLP, as stated in their report which is included herein.

 

 
| Perry A. Glassgow            |
|------------------------------|
| Vice President and Treasurer |
| Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         13,465
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             81
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                8,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   100,292
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         51,567
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           50,693
<LOANS>                                       174,808
<ALLOWANCE>                                     3,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                359,082
<DEPOSITS>                                    292,537
<SHORT-TERM>                                   10,660
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             3,078
<LONG-TERM>                                    25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,795
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                359,082
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 7,167
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               4,009
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  120
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               11,296
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              4,399
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,818
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           6,478
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                163
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 4,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,825
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      2,098
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,098
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.25
<LOANS-NON>                                       300
<LOANS-PAST>                                      293
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 1,228
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                2,951
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      13
<RECOVERIES>                                       19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               3,077
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            3,077
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         1,967


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 67 (Thursday, April 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8014]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1021 (Review)]


Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record\1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
order on malleable iron pipe fittings from China would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in 
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on November 3, 2008 (73 FR 
65401) and determined on February 6, 2009 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (74 FR 7703). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's review was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
February 19, 2009 (74 FR 7703).
    The Commission is scheduled to transmit its determination in this 
review to the Secretary of Commerce on April 1, 2009. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4069 (April 2009), 
entitled Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings from China (Inv. No. 731-TA-1021 
(Review)).

    Issued: April 1, 2009.

    By order of the Commission.
 Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-8014 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Angela Gladette KEMP, Appellant, v. Pam STEWART, as the Commissioner of Education, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2569

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 7, 2018]

Matthew R. McGuigan of Mill Stone Legal Group, LLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

***ON CONFESSION OF ERROR***

May, J.

A school administrator appeals a final order from the Education Practices Commission ("EPC"). The appellee, Commissioner of Education, has moved to remand the case to the EPC for further proceedings. Having reviewed the motion, the initial brief, and the record, we grant the motion and remand the case to the EPC.

The EPC convened a teacher hearing panel for an informal hearing, pursuant to sections 120.569 and 120.57(2), Florida Statutes (2017). The EPC issued a final order from which the administrator has now appealed.

In her initial brief, the administrator argues that the informal hearing was held before an improper panel of the EPC. The Commissioner agrees and has moved to *102remand the case to correct the procedural problem.

Section 1012.79(8)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), provides the EPC shall:

> from time to time, designate members of the commission to serve on panels for the purpose of reviewing and issuing final orders upon cases presented to the commission .... A case concerning a complaint against an administrator shall be reviewed and a final order issued by a panel composed of five commission members, at least one of whom must be a parent or sworn law enforcement officer and at least three of whom must be administrators.

Here, the panel holding the administrator's informal hearing and issuing the final order was composed of one parent, one administrator, and three teachers. However, because the complaint was against an administrator, the panel should have included three administrators.

An agency has an "inherent power to correct its own errors in its orders." *Filarski v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n* , 97 So.3d 278, 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). This is especially true when the error involves a due process violation. *Id.*

We therefore grant the Commissioner's motion, and reverse and remand the case to the EPC for further proceedings.

*Reversed and Remanded* .

Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Ronald WILLIAMS, DC#036161, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1837

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Diane C. SULLIVAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4076

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Certiorari is dismissed.
Bobbeth MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-804

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 67 (Thursday, April 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8072]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis: Notice of 
Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Council for the 
Elimination of Tuberculosis, Department of Health and Human Services, 
has been renewed for a 2-year period through March 15, 2011.
    For information, contact Hazel Dean, Sc.D., M.P.H., Executive 
Secretary, Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis, 
Department of Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E-10, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-8000 or fax 
404/639-8600.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 31, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-8072 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Telesat Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michel G. Cayouette, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 26, 2013



|/s/ Michel G. Cayouette |                                      
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Name:                   | Michel G. Cayouette                  
|Title:                  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John Douglas CLARK, Appellant.

No. 03-2951.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 5, 2004.

Decided May 10, 2004.

Robert Lee Teig, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John Douglas Clark, Manchester, KY, pro se.

Frank Santiago, Iowa City, IA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John Clark pleaded guilty to manufacturing and attempting to manufacture 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. The district court1 reduced Clark’s offense level by 2 levels for acceptance of responsibility, but denied an additional 1 -level reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b) because his notice of intent to plead guilty was untimely. The court sentenced him to 140 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release, and stated it would have imposed the same sentence if it had granted the additional reduction.

Clark now argues that he qualified for the additional 1-level reduction, but we conclude that this issue is unreviewable. *See United States v.*Simpkins, 953 F.2d 443, 446 (8th Cir.) (where sentence imposed falls within Guidelines range urged by appellant and it is clear sentencing court would have imposed same sentence regardless whether appellant’s argument for lower Guidelines range ultimately prevailed, matter is not reviewable), *cert. denied,*504 U.S. 928, 112 S.Ct. 1988, 118 L.Ed.2d 585 (1992).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50049 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ERIC PEREZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18

- CR

- 98

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Eric Perez has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Perez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 29, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50049 Document: 00515177519 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/29/2019No. 19

- 50049

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further respon sibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-50049 Document: 00515177519 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/29/2019