alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Miguel Andres LOPEZ-JUAN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70872.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 14, 2004.

Decided May 6, 2004.

Amy L. Pierce, Thomas N. Makris, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Barry J. Pettinato, Esq., Jennifer Keeney, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: THOMPSON, TASHIMA, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Miguel Andres Lopez-Juan, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal. The BIA’s determination that Lopez is ineligible for asylum “can be reversed only if the evidence presented by [Lopez-Juan] was such that a reasonable factfinder would have to conclude that the requisite fear of persecution existed.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (citation omitted).

As the BIA concluded, the record reflects that Lopez-Juan was never arrested, detained, or otherwise physically harmed. *See Singh v. INS,*134 F.3d 962, 969 (9th Cir.1998) (recognizing a lack of persecution *130where there is no significant physical violence or specific threats of serious harm). Lopez-Juan has not shown “that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.2003) (citations omitted). Since Lopez-Juan has failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily fails to demonstrate eligibility for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Additionally, Lopez-Juan’s due process claim fails because the IJ exercised the discretion set forth in the governing rule when he allowed the untimely submission of evidence by the government. *See*San. Fran. Local Op. Proc. Rule 3.

PETITION DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          14,268
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,812
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     53,849
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          43,428
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            43,259
<LOANS>                                        158,234
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,717
<DEPOSITS>                                     255,742
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,718
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,211
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,780
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 286,717
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,047
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,550
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   170
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,767
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,031
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,229
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,538
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  94
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,930
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,129
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,129
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.62
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,429
<LOANS-PAST>                                       169
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,829
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,384
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      164
<RECOVERIES>                                        56
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,576
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,576
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,115
        


</TABLE>
S. 111 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty three 

An Act 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rulemaking, to include a link 

to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed rule. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Accountability Through 

Transparency Act of 2023’’. 

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100-WORD SUMMARY TO REGULATIONS.GOV. 

Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end 

and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: 

‘‘(4) the Internet address of a summary of not more than 

100 words in length of the proposed rule, in plain language, 

that shall be posted on the Internet website under section 

206(d) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) 

(commonly known as regulations.gov).’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900 253G]


Indian Gaming; Approval of an Amendment to a Tribal-State Class 
III Gaming Compact in the State of Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California negotiated the First 
Amended Compact between the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California and 
the State of Nevada governing Class III gaming; this notice announces 
approval of the amended Compact.

DATES: This compact takes effect on January 18, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act (IGRA) requires the Secretary of the Interior to publish in the 
Federal Register notice of approved Tribal-State compacts that are for 
the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. 
See Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. All Tribal-State Class 
III compacts, including amendments, are subject to review and approval 
by the Secretary under 25 CFR 293.4. The First Amended Compact between 
the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California and the State of Nevada 
replaces the previous compact. The First Amended Compact allows the 
Tribe to operate all forms of Class III gaming within its Indian Lands 
that may be lawfully operated in the State. The First Amended Compact 
between the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California and the State of 
Nevada is approved. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(A).

    Dated: December 27, 2017.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Exercising the 
Authority of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018-00793 Filed 1-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7689]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural 
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. 
L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the 
question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the 
purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, 
are being manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations 
and be postmarked on or before April 27, 2009. Address written comments 
to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be examined between 
8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 3720.
Docket Number: 09-007. Applicant: University of Utah, Consortium for 
Astro-Particle Research, 215 South State Street, Suite 200, Salt Lake 
City, UT 84111. Instrument: Electron Light Source (ELS) accelerator. 
Manufacturer: University of Tokyo, Japan. Intended Use: The instrument 
will be used as a component of a large ground Telescope Array, which 
will allow the scientists to calibrate the telescopes by generating a 
particle beam that accurately simulates a cosmic ray shower. 
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No instruments of the same general 
category as the foreign instrument begin manufactured in the United 
States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: March 10, 
2009.

    Dated: March 31, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
[FR Doc. E9-7689 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51226 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LUIS ANDRES GARCIA-VALERIO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-88-ALL

-------------------- Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Andres Garcia-Valerio raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 63A/18 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 63A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5218 March 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 63A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5218 March 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2009/C 063A/01 | Notice of open competitionsEPSO/AST/91/09 — ASSISTANTS (*) (AST 3) IN THE ‘OFFSET PRINTING’ FIELD
  EPSO/AST/92/09 — ASSISTANTS (*) (AST 3) IN THE ‘PRE-PRESS’ FIELD | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2009/C 063A/01

Notice of open competitionsEPSO/AST/91/09 — ASSISTANTS (*) (AST 3) IN THE ‘OFFSET PRINTING’ FIELD
  EPSO/AST/92/09 — ASSISTANTS (*) (AST 3) IN THE ‘PRE-PRESS’ FIELD

EPSO/AST/91/09 — ASSISTANTS

(AST 3) IN THE ‘OFFSET PRINTING’ FIELD

EPSO/AST/92/09 — ASSISTANTS

(AST 3) IN THE ‘PRE-PRESS’ FIELD

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,217,637
<SECURITIES>                                 7,483,444
<RECEIVABLES>                                  427,812      
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    452,724      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,922,155    
<PP&E>                                         497,922      
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,537,204    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,615,584
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,820
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,785,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,537,204
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,939,023
<CGS>                                        1,084,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,334,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (179,505)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (216,106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (216,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (216,106)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Alonzo WIDEMAN, DOC #371626, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-829

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
T.P., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2149

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gregory HARRIS, Petitioner, v. SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0273

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
Document

EXHIBIT 10(f)(22)





2022 Executive Long-Term Incentive Program (2022 E-LTIP)


Under the 2022 E-LTIP, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive shares of common stock of the Company based on (i) satisfying certain performance measures established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (performance share units, “PSUs”) for 60% of the award and (ii) continued service only (restricted stock units) for 40% of the award.


The 2022 E-LTIP PSU performance measures and corresponding weightings for the three-year performance period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024, are as follows:


(i)Absolute Share Price (weighted 50%): Share price will be measured based on the average of the closing price on the final twenty trading days of the performance period, inclusive of dividends during the three-year performance period.


(ii)Cumulative, Adjusted Earnings per Share (EPS) (weighted 50%):  Diluted Earnings per Share from Continuing Operations as reported in the Company's audited consolidated financial statements, as adjusted annually on an after-tax basis for the following discretely disclosed items (in either Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) or the footnotes to the financial statements) on an individual basis, or in the aggregate, per item and subject to monetary thresholds as noted: 


•Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles;  
•Non-service retirement-related defined benefit pension and retiree health costs;  
•Restructuring and related costs;  
•Transaction and related costs;  
•Non-cash write-offs or impairments, except for assets acquired or developed within the past three years of the balance sheet date (to the extent the amount is greater than $10 million pre-tax);
•Gains/(losses) resulting from acts of war, terrorism, or natural disasters (to the extent the amount is greater than $10 million pre-tax);  
•Items individually identified within Other Expenses, net (except for interest, currency and asset sales) to the extent the amount is greater than $10 million pre-tax; if any such item qualifies for separate line item disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of income in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles consistently applied, then such item will also warrant adjustment;  
•Gains/(losses) from the settlement of tax audits or changes in enacted law (to the extent the amount is greater than $10 million pre-tax); 
•Impacts of any individual acquisition in excess of $500 million purchase price; 
•Impacts of a divestiture with revenue equal to or greater than $100 million; 
•Effects of a change in accounting principle as identified within the Company's consolidated financial statements or MD&A; and 
•Impact of share repurchases greater than two percent of adjusted EPS, as defined above.
1
David ORTEGA, Appellant, v. Amanda Torres MENDEZ, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2146

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, February 12, 2018 and Tuesday, February 13, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 or (510) 907-5274.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be held Monday, February 12, 2018, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Central Time and Tuesday, February 13, 2018, from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Central Time at the IRS Office in Dallas, Texas. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Matthew O'Sullivan. For more information please contact Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 or (510) 907-5274, or write TAP Office, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612-5217 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: January 10, 2018.

Antoinette Ross,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2018-00734 Filed 1-17-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of On4 Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Penny Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By: /s/Penny Green


Penny Green


Chief Financial Officer


February 16, 2010
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      13, 2008 | /s/ Gerald G. Barton                      |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Gerald      G. Barton                     |
|                                    | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                    | Landmark      Land Company, Inc.          |
Baltazar Gabriel DELGADOROS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-413

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 1, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.