alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 24, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 3399 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

48 CFR Chapter 1 

[Docket No. FAR 2018–0001, Sequence 

No. 1] 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–97; 

Small Entity Compliance Guide 

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), 

General Services Administration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA). 

ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide. 

SUMMARY: This document is issued 

under the joint authority of DOD, GSA, 

and NASA. This Small Entity 

Compliance Guide has been prepared in 

accordance with section 212 of the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996. It consists of a 

summary of the rule appearing in 

Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 

2005–97, which amends the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation (FAR). An 

asterisk (*) next to a rule indicates that 

a regulatory flexibility analysis has been 

prepared. Interested parties may obtain 

further information regarding this rule 

by referring to FAC 2005–97, which 

precedes this document. These 

documents are also available via the 

internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

DATES: January 24, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Cecelia Davis at 202–219–0202 for 

clarification of content. For information 

pertaining to status or publication 

schedules, contact the Regulatory 

Secretariat Division at 202–501–4755. 

Please cite FAC 2005–97, FAR Case 

2018–001. 

RULE LISTED IN FAC 2005–97 

Subject FAR case Analyst 

Trade Agreements 

Thresholds.

2018–001 Davis. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summary 

for the FAR rule follows. For the actual 

revisions and/or amendments made by 

this FAR case, refer to the specific item 

number and subject set forth in the 

document following this item summary. 

FAC 2005–97 amends the FAR as 

follows: 

Trade Agreements Thresholds (FAR 

Case 2018–001) 

This final rule amends the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation to adjust the 

thresholds for application of the World 

Trade Organization Government 

Procurement Agreement and the Free 

Trade Agreements as determined by the 

United States Trade Representative, 

according to predetermined formulae 

under the agreements. 

Dated: January 18, 2018. 

William F. Clark, 

Director, Office of Government-wide 

Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition 

Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2018–01200 Filed 1–23–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES2
CHOICE PLUS LLC, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1454

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
FW: US EPA White Paper Letter_060314 (Signed)

Please find our comments attached. Please disregard yesterday’s version and replace it with this version that 

contains some formatting corrections.

Elizabeth Scheehle

Chief, Alternative Fuels Branch

Stationary Source Division

California Air Resources Board

(916) 322­7630

Scheehle, Elizabeth@ARB <escheehl@arb.ca.gov>

Tue 6/17/2014 5:09 PM

To:OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; 

Importance: High

 1 attachment

US EPA White Paper Letter_060314 (Signed).pdf; 

FW: US EPA White Paper Letter_060314 (Signed) - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 1 of 1

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/26/2014
C.M.D., Petitioner, v. K.R.B., Respondent.

Case Nos. 2D17-2978

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2767-2768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01066]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: January 31, 2018, 1:00 p.m. EST.

PLACE: U.S. Chemical Safety Board, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 
910, Washington, DC 20006.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation 
Board (CSB) will convene a public meeting on Wednesday, January 31, 
2018 at 1:00 p.m. EST in Washington, DC, at the CSB offices located at 
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 910. The Board will discuss open 
investigations, the status of audits from the Office of the Inspector 
General, financial and organizational updates, and a review of the 
agency's action plan. New business will include an overview of the new 
``Safety Spotlight'' program and the CSB's 20th Anniversary.

Additional Information

    The meeting is free and open to the public. If you require a 
translator or interpreter, please notify the individual listed below as 
the ``Contact Person for Further Information,'' at least three business 
days prior to the meeting.
    A conference call line will be provided for those who cannot attend 
in person. Please use the following dial-in number to join the 
conference:

(888) 862-6557
Confirmation Number: 46190749

    The CSB is an independent federal agency charged with investigating 
incidents and hazards that result, or may result, in the catastrophic 
release of extremely hazardous substances. The agency's Board Members 
are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. CSB 
investigations look into all aspects of chemical accidents and hazards, 
including physical causes such as equipment failure as well as 
inadequacies in regulations, industry

[[Page 2768]]

standards, and safety management systems.

Public Comment

    The time provided for public statements will depend upon the number 
of people who wish to speak. Speakers should assume that their 
presentations will be limited to three minutes or less, but commenters 
may submit written statements for the record.

Contact Person for Further Information

    Hillary Cohen, Communications Manager, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9dede8fff1f4feddfeeeffb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c7c796e60656f4c6f7f6e226b637a">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 
446-8094. Further information about this public meeting can be found on 
the CSB website at: www.csb.gov.

    Dated: January 17, 2018.
Raymond Porfiri,
Deputy General Counsel, Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-01066 Filed 1-17-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6350-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
George RAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-428

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Thomas Eugene DEASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 30, 1998 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 21, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000750274
<NAME>                          BUFFETS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-21-1999
<CASH>                                         86,490
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  823
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    4,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,171
<PP&E>                                         550,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 459,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          96,851
<BONDS>                                        41,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       429
<OTHER-SE>                                     287,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   459,933
<SALES>                                        277,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               277,838
<CGS>                                          240,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  240,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,470
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,260
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            10,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,210
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .22



</TABLE>
Certification of Daniel Dror,
CEO and Chairman of International American Technologies, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

I, Daniel Dror, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form
10-KSB of International American Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, 
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the undersigned by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report management's conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  I have indicated in this annual report
whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: April 15, 2005, 
Daniel Dror, CEO and Chairman/s/ Daniel Dror
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Davidson Diversified Real Estate II, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 14, 2008     
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 14, 2008     



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT
32.2











CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elena
Pochapski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Siberian Energy Group Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-KSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Siberian Energy Group Inc.





By:/s/ Elena
Pochapski


Elena
Pochapski


Principal
Financial Officer


(Principal
Accounting Officer)







July 16,
2008
#### Kulvinder SINGH CHALL, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70538.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 20, 2004.

Earle A. Sylva, Esq., Taz-Hai Huang, Rai Law *&*Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Esq., Jacqueline Drden, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kulvinder Singh Chali, a native and citizen of India, petitions for' review of the *788Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Because the BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision without opinion, we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency determination. *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir.2003). We review credibility findings for substantial evidence. *Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding because inconsistencies between Singh’s testimony and documentary evidence shed doubt on whether he was arrested by Indian authorities in Bombay and also on the circumstances under which he decided to leave the country, incidents going to the heart of his asylum claim. *See id.*

Because we uphold the determination that Singh failed to establish eligibility for asylum, we also uphold the denial of his application for withholding of removal. *See id.*

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7458** 

BEVERLY R. MANGUM , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 7:11

- cv - 00205

- SGW )

Submitted : March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Beverly Ricardo Mangum, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Beverly Ricardo Mangum seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satis fies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2 003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mangum has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and lega l3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7846]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Wednesday, April 15, 2009:

2-4 p.m. Mountain Daylight Time (MDT),
[4-6 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT)].

Place: The Westin Tabor Center, 1672 Lawrence Street, Denver, Colorado 
80202, (303) 572-9100.

Agenda: The Commission will hold a public meeting and a workshop to 
receive presentations on the following topic: Cost-Saving Practices for 
Election Management. The Commission will consider other administrative 
matters. Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC 
meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public 
may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the 
proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires 
advance notice to and coordination with the Commission's Communications 
Office.*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    * View EAC Regulations Implementing Government in the Sunshine 
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This meeting will be open to the public.

Person To Contact For Information: Bryan Whitener; Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-7846 Filed 4-2-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
Jody Ray FURR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3065

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1278 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at 985 Michigan 

Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal 

Building’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1278 ES

1 SECTION 1. ROSA PARKS FEDERAL BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

3 985 Michigan Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known 

4 and designated as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’. 

5 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg6 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

7 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

8 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rosa Parks 

9 Federal Building’’. 

10 (c) REPEALS.— 

11 (1) Public Law 109–98 (119 Stat. 2168) is re12 pealed. 

13 (2) Sections 1 and 2 of Public Law 109–101 

14 (119 Stat. 2171) are repealed. 

Passed the Senate November 29, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1278 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at 985 

purposes. ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’, and for other Michigan Avenue in Detroit, Michigan, as the