alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS
 Exhibit 31.1
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Veramark Technologies, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  May 13, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Anthony C. MazzulloAnthony C. MazzulloPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1004 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1004

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to eliminate origination fees 
                        on Federal Direct loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2023

  Mr. Braun (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Ms. Warren, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Van 
    Hollen, Mr. Coons, Mr. Kaine, and Mr. Menendez) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to eliminate origination fees 
                        on Federal Direct loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Tax Elimination Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF ORIGINATION FEES ON FEDERAL DIRECT LOANS.

    (a) Repeal of Origination Fees.--Subsection (c) of section 455 of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(c)) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to loans made under part D of title IV of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) for which the first 
disbursement of principal is made, or, in the case of a Federal Direct 
Consolidation Loan, the application is received, on or after March 27, 
2022.
                                 <all>
```
Marius D. SLOAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0810

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Artis PYE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2236

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 05, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Geoffrey J. BOULMAY, Sr. v. Frederick R. HEEBE, Jr., Copeland Estate, et al

NO. 2018-00193

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1169 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1169

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to address disclosures by 
  directors, officers, and principal stockholders of foreign private 
                    issuers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2023

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to address disclosures by 
  directors, officers, and principal stockholders of foreign private 
                    issuers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURES BY DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 16(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78p(a)(1)) is amended by inserting ``(including any 
such security of a foreign private issuer, as that term is defined in 
section 240.3b-4 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any 
successor regulation)'' after ``pursuant to section 12''.
    (b) Effect on Regulation.--If any provision of section 240.3a12-
3(b) of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor 
regulation, is inconsistent with the amendment made by subsection (a), 
that provision of such section 240.3a12-3(b) (or such successor) shall 
have no force or effect.
    (c) Issuance or Amendment of Regulations.--Not later than 90 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange 
Commission shall issue final regulations (or amend existing regulations 
of the Commission) to carry out the amendment made by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Questions from Maine for call on September 8, 2014

 In the TSD list of generating assets we see where industrial co
- generation facilities are exempted. Could you point us to where that exemption is in the proposed regulation?
-- Christian  RGGI considers biomass renewable, does the EPA proposal? Is a >250 MMbtu/hr biomass facility that burns <10% fossil fuel exempt from 111d?
– Christian  EPA has determined a 25 % renewable energy goal for the State of Maine and is using a 3,611,728 MWhr for our existing and future amount of renewable energy production. The problem with this baseline is that we do not know how much of this electricity is being sent out of state to meet renewable energy contracts in other states and would Maine be unable to b e given credit for this generation of electricity. Thus for Maine to be able to understand whether our renewable energy baseline is correct and appropriate for this rule EPA would need to explain how renewable energy generation is to be credited to a State’s goal, in the baseline as well as in the future. Can EPA explain to Maine how this dilemma will be reconciled?
-- OAP  I do not know what amount of electricity generated in state is under contract to other states and I have just read where we get 18% of our electricity from Canada. How is a state to track what electricity is should be accounted for und er the 111(d) plan? With that said how can we accurately comment on the baseline and goal requirements?
Kalim Nyabinghi MILLER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellees.

No. 1D16-3676

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Leroy MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2780

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Discoveries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Judy M. Robinett, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 14, 2005                   /s/ Judy M. Robinett
                                           --------------------
                                           Judy M. Robinett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form
10-QSB solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate
disclosure document.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION
                                            EXHIBIT 11

                       BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE COMPUTATION


                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED                 SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                 DECEMBER 31,                     DECEMBER 31,
                                            2000             1999             2000            1999
                                       ---------------  ---------------  ---------------  -------------
                                        BASIC/DILUTED    BASIC/DILUTED    BASIC/DILUTED   BASIC/DILUTED
                                       ---------------  ---------------  ---------------  -------------
<S>                                    <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Average outstanding shares:                    54,675           51,560           54,332         50,262
Dilutive options outstanding                        -                -                -              -
Equivalent Shares                              54,675           51,560           54,332         50,262
                                       ===============  ===============  ===============  =============

Net income (loss) available to common
  stockholders                         $       (3,927)  $      (16,621)  $       (5,490)  $    (19,172)
                                       ===============  ===============  ===============  =============
Earnings (loss) per share              $        (0.07)  $        (0.32)  $        (0.10)  $      (0.38)
                                       ===============  ===============  ===============  =============
</TABLE>


                                      -20-
<PAGE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 24
- 10188 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Mallori Lee Moss,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21
- CR
- 146 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Graves, Willett,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Mallori Lee Moss has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moss has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 30, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 24-10188 Document: 39-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/30/2024No. 24
- 10188

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 24-10188 Document: 39-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/30/2024
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Mark W. Hahn, certify that:



| | (1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Cempra, Inc.;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 17, 2016



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark W. Hahn                                     
|Mark W. Hahn                                         
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Levi Z. PARRISH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5204

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 9, 2018

Levi Z. Parrish, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Ray, and Makar, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR NOONEY REALTY TRUST, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         117,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               366,156
<PP&E>                                      20,507,396
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,044,442)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,260,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          652,776
<BONDS>                                      4,591,995
<COMMON>                                       866,624
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,959,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,260,508
<SALES>                                      1,511,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,519,233
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,613,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (288,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (288,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Dwayne BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-2662

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MEDIDEA, L.L.C.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES 

PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC., 

DBA DEPUY SYNTHES JOINT 

RECONSTRUCTION,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2020-1334

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Massachusetts in No. 1:17-cv-11172-LTS, Judge 

Leo T. Sorokin.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

FREDERICK MICHAUD, Capshaw DeRieux LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DAVID LESHT, MARTIN AMARO, JOSEPH M. VANEK, 

Sperling & Slater, P.C., Chicago, IL; TODD RAY WALTERS, 

Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Alexandria, VA. 

 CALVIN GRIFFITH, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, argued 

Case: 20-1334 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 01/07/2021
for defendants-appellees. Also represented by THOMAS 

KOGLMAN, KENNETH LUCHESI, PATRICK NORTON; 

CHRISTOPHER M. MORRISON, Boston, MA; GREGORY A.

CASTANIAS, Washington, DC. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and 

CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

January 7, 2021 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1334 Document: 64 Page: 2 Filed: 01/07/2021
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 889 

Condemning the Hamas-led terrorist attack on the State of Israel on October 

7, 2023, and calling for Hamas to immediately and unconditionally 

surrender, cease its attacks, and safely release all hostages. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. LAWLER (for himself, Mr. MOSKOWITZ, Ms. TENNEY, Ms. SALAZAR, Ms. 

MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Mr. KUSTOFF, and Mr. 

GOTTHEIMER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the Hamas-led terrorist attack on the State 

of Israel on October 7, 2023, and calling for Hamas 

to immediately and unconditionally surrender, cease its 

attacks, and safely release all hostages. 

Whereas Hamas is a United States-designated Foreign Terrorist organization whose founding charter states a commitment to destroying the State of Israel; 

Whereas, since Hamas was founded in 1987, Hamas terrorists have repeatedly carried out lethal attacks in Israel 

and, since taking control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, 

fought numerous wars against Israel; 

Whereas, on October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists led an attack 

on the Israel, murdering upwards of 1,200 individuals, 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 889 IH 

taking over 240 individuals hostage, and launching thousands of rockets toward Israel; 

Whereas, since the attack, Israel has launched operations to 

defend its people, eradicate Hamas terrorists, and rescue 

hostages held in the Gaza Strip; 

Whereas Israel, like other sovereign states, has a right to defend itself; 

Whereas in past Hamas-Israel conflicts, Hamas has repeatedly broken negotiated ceasefire agreements and initiated 

attacks against Israel; 

Whereas, on October 24, 2023, a Hamas official stated the 

terrorist organization’s determination to attack Israel in 

a similar manner to the October 7, 2023, attack until 

Israel is destroyed; and 

Whereas intentionally murdering civilians is barbaric, inhumane, and indisputably wrong: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the Hamas-led terrorist attack on 

3 the State of Israel on October 7, 2023; and 

4 (2) calls for Hamas to immediately and uncon5 ditionally surrender, cease its attacks, and safely re6 lease all hostages. 

Æ 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Bryan ARCISZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-2782

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.