# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15

- 1481 V Filed: May 12, 2017 UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NICKOLAS CASELLES , * * Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages ;

v. * Influenza ; * Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (“ GBS ”); SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Diana Lynn Stadelnikas, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL

, f or petitioner. Anne Donohue Martin , U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On December 7, 2015

, p etitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 ( the “Vaccine Act” )

. Petitioner alleges that he suffered G uillain

- Barre Syndrome ( “ GBS ” ) after receiving an influenza vaccination on January 14, 2013

. Petition at 1-2 ; Stipulation , filed May 12, 2017

, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges t hat he experienced residual effects of his injury for more than six months and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition . Petit ion at 2 ; Stipulation at ¶¶ 4-5

. “ Respondent denies t hat petitioner ’s influenza vaccine caused GBS or any other injury, and denies that petitioner suffered the residual effects of GBS for more than six months. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, o n May 12, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the term s stated in the attached Stipulation

, the undersigned award s the following compensation:

A lump sum of $2 0,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner

. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a). Id

.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.