alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2777-2778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00888]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2018-3002]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM), as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the 
proposed information collection, as required by the paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995.
    The Export-Import Bank of the United States, pursuant to the 
Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, facilitates the finance of the export 
of U.S. goods and services. The ``Report of Premiums Payable for 
Exporters Only'' form will be used by exporters to report and pay 
premiums on insured shipments to various foreign buyers.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 20, 2018 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB 92-29) or by mail to Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20038, Attn: OMB 
3048-0017 The application tool can be reviewed at: http://exim.gov/sites/default/files/pub/pending/eib92-29.pdf.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-29 Export-Import Bank Report of 
Premiums Payable for Exporters Only.
    OMB Number: 3048-0017.
    Type of Review: Renewal.
    Need and Use: The ``Report of Premiums Payable for Exporters Only'' 
form is used by exporters to report and pay premiums on insured 
shipments to various foreign buyers under the terms of the policy and 
to certify that premiums have been correctly computed and remitted. The 
`Report of Premiums Payable for Exporters Only' is used by EXIM to 
determine the eligibility of the shipment(s) and to calculate the 
premium due to EXIM for its support of the shipment(s) under its 
insurance program.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Monthly Number of Respondents: 2,600.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 7,800 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: Monthly.

Government Expenses

    Reviewing Time per Year: 7,800 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $331,500.
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.

[[Page 2778]]

    Total Government Cost: $397,800.

Bassam Doughman,
IT Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2018-00888 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

NAZARIO MARQUEZ-FLORES, a.k.a. 

Nazario Flores Marquez, a.k.a. Nazario 

Marquez Flores, a.k.a. Nazario MarquezFlorez, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

Nos. 16-10284 

 16-10298

D.C. Nos. 2:13-cr-01382-PGR 

 4:15-cr-02287-PGR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 8, 2017**

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Nazario Marquez-Flores appeals the 24-month

sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed 

alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the consecutive 18-month sentence 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 11 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-10284 & 16-10298

imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Marquez-Flores’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there 

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

We have provided Marquez-Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental 

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in these direct appeals. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
​

EXHIBIT 10.9
CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
AMENDMENT RE:  DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES
This amendment is made this 17th day of June, 2021, and effective as of January 1, 2021, by CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION (“Company”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Employer maintains the Citizens & Northern Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Company may amend the Plan at anytime and from time to time as it sees fit through the action of its Board of Directors (the “Board”); and
WHEREAS, the Company has determined to amend Section 8.1 of the Plan to clarify the intent and operation of the Plan with respect to payment options and forms available to participants. 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends Plan Section 8.1, effective as of January 1, 2021 as follows:
8.1 Timing of Payments. Subject to the provisions of this ARTICLE VIII, a
Participant may elect under his Participation Agreement, in accordance with Section 409A of the Code, whether to have his benefit paid to him in monthly or annual installments over a period selected by the Participant or in a lump sum. The Participant may elect a different form of payment pursuant to each annual deferral election. Each annual deferral election shall be independent and records shall be kept separately from each other annual deferral election. The Participant may also elect different payment option forms for each Qualifying Distribution Event.
​
RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Company are and each of them is, hereby authorized and directed in the name of and on behalf of the Company, to execute and deliver this amendment pursuant to the Citizens & Northern Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan and to do all other things, including the execution of any other necessary documents setting forth the terms of such amendment. 
​
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date set forth herein.
CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION
By: /s/ Kaitlynn J. Meyers
Kaitlynn J. Meyers, Acting Corporate Secretary

1
 SL1 1690870v1 002256.00044​
Table of Contents


Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
UNDER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of CPFL Energia S.A. (the Company)
does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
  information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |                                    
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ José Antonio de Almeida Filippo
|Date: April 30, 2008 |  | José Antonio de Almeida Filippo    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            May-31-1997
<CASH>                                      182,930
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               364,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                  4,473
<INVENTORY>                                  87,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            650,925
<PP&E>                                      366,409
<DEPRECIATION>                              331,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,166,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       405,935
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 8,479,854
<OTHER-SE>                              (7,855,438)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,166,227
<SALES>                                    596,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           425,298
<CGS>                                      171,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              191,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (6,855)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            277,967
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (41,666)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (41,666)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.03)
               

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 13, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128047 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan CAROL ARCHER-HALL, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128047 COA: 257740 WCAC: 03-000249 VARIETY FOOD SERVICES, INC., and AMERICAN ZURI CH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1006 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 13, 2005

Clerk
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6343** 

SHAWN DUPREE CORPENING , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. ALVIN KELLER, Secretary of the Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00255

- RJC )

Submitted : June 1, 2012 Decided: June 8, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Shawn Dupree Corpening , Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III , NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not b inding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shawn Dupree Corpening seeks to ap peal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not ti mely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the

ap peal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bow l e s v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ).
The district court’s ord er was entered on the docket on August 2, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on February 9, 2012. Because Corpening failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Ishsha SHALEM, Petitioner, v. Daniel JUNIOR, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 3D17-2312

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 27, 2017

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent State of Florida.

Before SUAREZ, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Petitioner Ishsha Shalem petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus claiming her pretrial detention without bond is unlawful. We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand this cause to the trial court.

A review of the record shows that the Petitioner was ordered detained without any condition for pretrial release pending trial. She was originally arrested on February 5, 2016 and a bond was set. The information charged the Petitioner with one count of child neglect with no harm. Petitioner was to appear for arraignment on March 16, 2016 and failed to appear. She was arrested on capias warrant on October 18, 2017 and her case was heard twice, on October 18 and 19, 2017. Bond was requested but denied. The record and *343transcripts from the hearings show that the requirements of section 907.041, Florida Statutes (2017) and Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.131 and 3.132 were not followed, and the trial court failed to make the proper findings before ordering pretrial detention.

Therefore, we grant the petition for habeas corpus and remand this cause to the trial court. The State shall have until 5:00 p.m. Friday October 27, 2017, to file a legally sufficient motion for pretrial detention if it chooses to do so. The trial court shall, no later than Monday, October 30, 2017, conduct a hearing pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.131 and 3.132, to determine appropriate conditions of release or detention, and any pretrial detention order shall comport with the requirements of section 907.041, Florida Statutes (2017). The defendant shall remain in custody pending the determination of pretrial release or detention.

This opinion shall take effect immediately notwithstanding the filing or disposition of any motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, Robert Waters, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Avalon Gold Corporation, a Nevada Corporation (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 21, 2004

/s/ Robert Waters
---------------
Robert Waters
President and Chief Executive Officer
Document

Cumulus Media Inc.
Description of 2022 Quarterly Incentive Plan




Awards to executive officers under Cumulus Media Inc.’s (the “Company”) annual executive incentive plan for certain officers of the Company, which operates as a quarterly incentive plan for 2022 (the “2022 QIP”), will be based on the Company achieving budgeted adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) levels, adjusted for any asset sales or purchases. The target cash incentive award opportunity available to each executive officer under the 2022 QIP is calculated as a percentage of each executive officer’s base salary, all in accordance with the terms of each such officer’s existing employment agreement.


Under the 2022 QIP, performance is measured at the end of each quarter, beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2022, based on year-to-date performance at the end of the respective quarter. If target performance levels for the year-to-date period have been met or exceeded, 12.5% of the total annual target bonus will be awarded following applicable quarter end. If, at the completion of any quarter, target performance levels for the year-to-date period (other than the full year period) have not been met, no payment will be made for that period.


Following the end of the year, actual annual performance will be compared to the pre-established threshold, target and maximum performance goals. If the Company achieves the full-year 2022 target EBITDA goal, each executive officer will be entitled under the 2022 QIP to a total full year payout of 100% of his or her respective 2022 QIP target award opportunity. If the Company achieves the full year threshold EBITDA goal, each executive officer will be entitled under the 2022 QIP to a total payout for the full year equal to 50% (threshold award opportunity) of his or her 2021 QIP target award opportunity, and if the Company meets or exceeds the full year maximum EBITDA goal, each executive officer will be entitled under the 2022 QIP to a total payout of 200% (maximum award opportunity) of his or her 2022 QIP target award opportunity. Actual performance between threshold and target and target and maximum will result in payout amounts determined by linear interpolation. The payout amount calculated for performance over the full-year period will be reduced by payments previously made for the quarterly periods in 2022.
Kultar Singh GORAYA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2910

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Document

Exhibit 10.33

AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR


COLFAX CORPORATION NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


The Colfax Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2016 and as subsequently amended (together, the “Plan”), is hereby further amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2022:


1.Section 1.10 is hereby deleted in its entirety and amended and restated as follows:


“1.10 ‘Bonus’ shall mean one or more cash bonuses designated from time to time by the Committee as eligible for deferral under this Plan, including, without limitation, bonuses under the Colfax Corporation Annual Incentive Plan, but excluding all retention bonuses and change in control bonuses unless the Committee otherwise determines that retention and change in control bonuses will be included.”


2.Section 1.18 is hereby deleted in its entirety and amended and restated as follows:


“1.18 ‘Disability’ or ‘Disabled’ shall mean that a Participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months. A Participant shall be considered Disabled only if he or she meets one or both of the following criteria:


(a)He or she has been determined under the Employer’s long-term disability plan as eligible for benefits thereunder; or


(b)He or she has been determined by the Social Security Administration as eligible for Social Security disability benefits.”


In all other respects the Plan, as amended herein, is hereby ratified and confirmed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Colfax Corporation has caused this instrument to be signed by its duly authorized officer as of this     9th     day of    December     , 2021.


COLFAX CORPORATION


By: 
Its:VP Total Rewards     












1


010-9257-2774/2
Reynerio Alonso RIVERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Elizabeth SCHREY, Appellant, v. Damian E. SCHREY, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1942

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3906

_____________________________
M ICHAEL L LOYD W ORRELL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Cour t for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

. January 11 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9 .330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael Lloyd Worrell, pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Albert E. Bergeron, Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer of US Shipping General Partner LLC, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

| |  | /s/ALBERT E. BERGERONAlbert E. Bergeron Vice PresidentChief Financial OfficerMarch 13, 2008
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to U.S. Shipping Partners L.P. and will be retained by U.S. Shipping
Partners L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Loto Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Knight, Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
September 13, 2010





By:
            /s/
      Stephen KnightName:
            Stephen
      KnightTitle:
            Principal
      Executive Officer and
              Principal
      Financial Officer