alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1106 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1106

  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide taxpayers with 
               information regarding the Federal budget.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2023

    Mr. Braun (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide taxpayers with 
               information regarding the Federal budget.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Receipt Act''.

SEC. 2. INFORMATION REGARDING THE FEDERAL BUDGET.

    The Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary's delegate, shall 
provide, to each individual filing a Federal income tax return for a 
taxable year, a one-page document which contains, with respect to the 
most recently completed fiscal year--
            (1) total Federal outlays during such year;
            (2) total Federal revenues collected during such year;
            (3) the Federal deficit or surplus for such year; and
            (4) the total Federal debt held by the public.
                                 <all>
```
STATE EX REL. Dennis Donyel THOMAS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0975

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL, DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Writ granted. The district court's ruling of September 9, 2016, dismissing relator's application for post-conviction relief on procedural grounds is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court for consideration of the merits of relator's claims pertaining to ineffective assistance and the subornation of perjury. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 929, 930. If the district court orders an evidentiary hearing, it shall appoint counsel. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.7(C).
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

Certification

              1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-A, Asset Backed Notes, Series 2004-A;

              2.	Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports,
 taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as
of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

              3.	Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports
is included in these reports;

              4.	Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance
statement included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee
in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

              5.	The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating
to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

              In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company.


   NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.


   By:  /s/  Kevin Cloyd
   Name:   Kevin Cloyd
   Title:  Executive Vice President
   Date:   March 29, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1611
DONALD SULLIVAN; JEFFREY S. SULLIVAN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GEORGE W. BUSH; JOEL HEFLEY, Chairman, House Committee on Official Conduct; HENRY HYDE, Chairman, House Committee on International Affairs; JOHN BARGO, Chief-of-Staff, House Committee on Official Conduct; 535 JOHN DOES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-39-7-F) Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 25, 2003 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior District Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Sullivan, Jeffrey S. Sullivan, Appellants Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Vincent Garvey, Scott Ramsey McIntosh, Teal Elizabeth Luthy, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Donald Sullivan and Jeffrey S. Sullivan appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint and denying, as moot, their motion for preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sullivan v. United States , No. CA-03-39-7 -F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Karen GUY and Stephen Guy v. The HOWARD HUGHES CORPORATION and Liberty Mutual, et al.

NO. 2018-CC-0086

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 9, 2018

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 62 (Thursday, April 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 14962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time And Date: 11 a.m., Friday April 3, 2009.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Staff Assistant.
 [FR Doc. E9-7537 Filed 3-31-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Yasmine HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4925

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Airworthiness Directive Pacific Aerospace Fl et c her FU24 and FU24A Series Airc raft I CIVJL AVIATION AUTHORITY I O F NEWZEALAND

I ssued by the Civil Aviation Authority or New Zealand in accordance with section 721(3A) of the Civil Aviation Act . An Airworthi n ess Di rective (AD) conta i ns regulatory Information wh i ch is manda tory . An operator or a n airc raft m ust not opera te the ai rc ra ft un l ess the op erato r complies with every applicable AD Issued by the D i rector in accordance with section 721(3A) of the Civil Aviation Act . An AD Is Issue d w h ere t h e Director believes on reasonable grounds that an unsaf e condition exists In an aircraft or aeronautica l product. DCAJFU24 / 183 App licability : R e quirement : Contro l C o lumn - Inspecti on All FU24 and FU24A series aircraft fitted with control column PIN 08-45031/32 . To prevent failure of the control column due to po ss ible mechanical damage or deformation w hich could result in cracks , inspect t he control column per the instructions in Pacific Aerospace Limited ( PAL) Mandatory Service B u lleti n ( M S B) No . PACSB/FU/09 5 i s sue 2 dated 28 M ay 20 14 . If no m echanica l damag e o r deformat io n is fo u nd , no fu rther act ion is require d . If any cracks are fo u nd , replace the control column pe r the instructions in PACSB/FU/095 before further flight. If any mechanical damage or deformat ion is found , accomplish the NOT inspection of the control column per PACSB/FU/095 . If any cracks are found , replace the control column per PACSB/FU/095 before further fl ight. If no cracks are found accomplish a NOT inspection at intervals not to excee d 50 hours TIS until replacem e nt. Repl ace the control column at the next maintenance inspec t ion or within the next 150 hours TIS, whichever is the later . (Occurrence No 1 2/ 1 78 4 refe rs) Compliance: Wi t hi n the n ext 50 h ou rs TIS. Effective Date: 29 M ay 20 14 B ac kground : This AD re q uires an inspection of the control colum n for mechanical damage , d eformation and cracks per the instructions in Pacific Aerospace Limite d (PAL) Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No . PACSB/FU/095 issue 2 dated 28 May 201 4 . For control columns found with mechanical damage or deformation t he AD requires a 50 hour repetitive NOT insp e ct i on until replacement. Control column replacement is required at the next maintenance inspection , or within the next 1 50 hours TIS , whichever is the later.

Owen Oils Airworthiness Specialist Delegate of the Civil Aviation Authortiy ofNew Zealand 29 May 2014
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Keyser Resouces, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maurice Bidaux, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 15, 2010




By:
/s/ Maurice BidauxMaurice BidauxChief Executive OfficerPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and will be retained by Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 The HONORABLE MARK W. BENNETT, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-1292

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Ismael Guzman-Fregoso, also known * as Chi-Chi, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 7, 2001 Filed: November 16, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After Ismael Guzman-Fregoso pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(viii), and 846, the district court 1 sentenced him to 270 months in prison and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and filed a brief arguing that the United States breached a promise to file a motion for downward departure for substantial assistance. Guzman-Fregoso filed-2- a pro se supplemental brief arguing that his plea was unknowing and involuntary because he was induced to plead guilty by the government’s promise to make such a motion, and that his counsel was ineffective. We reject these arguments and affirm. The plea agreement clearly preserved the government’s discretion to determine whether Guzman-Fregoso provided substantial assistance, see United States v. Romsey , 975 F.2d 556, 558 (8th Cir. 1992), and he did not attempt to show the government’s refusal was made in bad faith, was irrational, or was based on an unconstitutional motive, see Wade v. United States , 504 U.S. 181, 185-86 (1992). In addition, Guzman-Fregoso gave assurances under oath at his plea hearing that he understood the government had discretion in determining whether to make a departure motion. His failure to attempt to withdraw his guilty plea precludes him from challenging its voluntariness on appeal. SeeUnited States v. Murphy , 899 F.2d 714, 716 (8th Cir. 1990). Guzman-Fregoso’s ineffective-assistance claims are more appropriately presented in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See United States v. Martin , 59 F.3d 767, 771 (8th Cir. 1995). Finally, following our independent review in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

               Certification by Accounting Manager to Section 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Touchstone Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the "Report"), I, Michelle
L. Carrozzella, Accounting Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ Michelle L. Carrozzella
----------------------------------
Michelle L. Carrozzella
Accounting Manager
November 6, 2003
EXHIBIT 3.2
 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
R.G. BARRY CORPORATION
 
 FIRST
 SECOND
 THIRD
 FOURTH




---



##### 








---



##### 



Designation of Series
 Number of Shares
 Dividend Payment Dates
 Dividend Rate




---



##### 



Cumulative Dates
 Voting Rights
 Reacquired Shares
 Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up




---



##### 



Consolidation, Merger, etc.
 No Redemption
 Ranking
 Amendment
 Fractional Shares
  Designation of Series
 Number of Shares
 Dividend Payment Dates
 Dividend Rate




---



##### 



Cumulative Dates
 Voting Rights
 Reacquired Shares
 Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up




---



##### 



Consolidation, Merger, etc.
 No Redemption
 Ranking
 Amendment
 Fractional Shares
 Series II Junior Participating Class A Preferred Shares
 Designation of Series Series II Class A Preferred Shares
 Number of Shares
 Dividend Payment Dates




---



##### 



Dividend Rate
  Cumulative Dates
 Voting Rights
 Reacquired Shares
 Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up
 Series II
Class A Liquidation Preference Common Adjustment Adjustment Number




---



##### 



Consolidation, Merger, etc
 No Redemption
 Ranking
 Amendment
 Fractional Shares
 FIFTH
 SIXTH




---



##### 








---



##### 



SEVENTH




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



EIGHTH Mandatory Indemnification




---



##### 



Court-Approved Indemnification
   Indemnification for Expenses
 Determination Period




---



##### 



Advances for Expenses
   Article EIGHTH Not Exclusive
 Insurance
 Indemnity Agreements
 Indemnification of Employees and Agents of the Corporation
 Certain Definitions




---



##### 



Venue
 NINTH
 TENTH
 ELEVENTH
Marcus E. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3679

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NPC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 29, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James K. Schwartz, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of NPC International, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2009



/s/ James K. SchwartzJames K. SchwartzPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division 

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 2, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”) Wireless Industrial Technology Konsortium Inc. (“WITK”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Softing AG, Haar, GERMANY; and Cooper Industries, Houston, TX have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Airsprite Technologies, Inc., Marlborough, MA has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and WITK intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. 

                    On August 8, 2008, WITK filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 18, 2008 (73 FR 54170).                 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

 [FR Doc. E9-758 Filed 1-16-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Restaurant Properties II
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
    
    November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. Moriarty
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. Terrano
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PUBLIC MEETING ON TEST PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS U.S. Department of Energy 

### Room 1E-245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington DC 20585 August 23, 2006 Purpose: The Department is holding this public meeting to hear comments on DOE's proposed rule on test procedures for residential central air conditioners and heat pumps. 9:00

- 9:05 am Welcome 9:05 - 9:30 am Opening Remarks, Introductions, and Agenda Review 9:30 - 9:45 am Brief Statements by Stakeholders on Key Issues 9:45 - 10:30 am Amendments to the Test Method 10:30

- 10:45 am Break 10:45 - 11:30 am Amendments to the Test Method (cont.) 11:30 - 12:00 pm Test Method Issues on Which DOE Request Comments 12:00

- 1:00 pm Lunch 1:00 - 2:30 pm Amendments to the Sampling & Rating Procedures 2:30-2:45pm Break 2:45 - 3:30 pm Sampling & Rating Issues on Which DOE Requests Comments 3:30 - 4:30 pm Other Issues and Comments 4:30 - 5:00 pm Closing Remarks/Adjourn
Exhibit
23.1





LAKE
& ASSOCIATES, CPA’s LLC





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the use, in the report on Form 10-K of Darshan Equity
Investment, Inc. (A Development Stage Company), of our report dated March 17,
2010 on our audit of the financial statements of Darshan Equity Investment, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2009, and the related statement
of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows from inception on May 26,
2009 through December 31, 2009, and the reference to us under the caption
“Experts.”





/s/ Lake & Associates CPA’s
LLC


Lake
& Associates, CPA’s LLC


Schaumburg,
Illinois




March 29,
2010