alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U nit ed Sta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 06-1517 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v. BELEN NIEVES-CASTAÑO, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on March 27, 2007 is amended as follows: On page 2, line 4: Insert the word "of" between "possession" and "a." On page 2, line 20: Replace t h e w o r d "era" with the word "rea." On page 5, line 4: R e p l a c e t h e number "18" with the number "26." On page 5, line 19: Repl a c e the number "18" with the number "26." On page 11, line 10: In place of the two spaces between "B." and "Constitutionality," insert a line indent.
<PAGE>
                        CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION
                                  EXHIBIT 12

           PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                     SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
                                     ------------------
                                                 FULLY
                                      PRIMARY    DILUTED
                                     ---------  ---------
<S>                                  <C>        <C>
Average outstanding shares:            46,506     46,506 
Primary options outstanding               141          - 
Fully diluted options outstanding           -        749 
                                     ---------  ---------
Equivalent Shares                      46,648     47,255 
                                     =========  =========

Net income                           $  1,300   $  1,300 
Preferred stock dividends
  and accretion of preferred shares       (18)       (18)
                                     ---------  ---------
Net income available to common
  stockholders                       $  1,282   $  1,282 
                                     =========  =========
Earnings per share                   $   0.03   $   0.03 
                                     =========  =========
</TABLE>
----

| Date:  | August                11, 2006 |   |                                                    |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                           | By:    | /s/                David L. Johnson                     |
|   |                           |   | David                L. Johnson                         |
|   |                           |   | Chairman                of the Board,                   |
|   |                           |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer of |
|   |                           |   | Maxus                Realty Trust, Inc.                 |
Aveis L. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-3336

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 4, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
DFPIOFTRAi^lSPOBWlO N DOCKtI S

" ! i' \n ' i ! OST-2010-004 6 USDO T Secretary Dea r Sir : Pleas e le t u s stay i nMountai n Tim e zone . It' s ou r wa y o f lif e an dw e wan t t o kee p it . Rura l Residen t Merce r Count y
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2

NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

This Note Modification Agreement (Agreement) is made as of the 15th day
of September 2002 between Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association
(Bank) and Winland Electronics, Incorporated (Borrower).

RECITALS

The Bank is the holder of a promissory note of Borrower dated September
26, 2000 in the maximum principal amount of $3,500,000.00 (Note). The Bank
and the Borrower have agreed to certain modifications to the Note, more fully
described below.

Accordingly, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable
consideration, each paid to the other, the parties to the Agreement agree that
the Note is modified as such that the maximum principal amount available under
the Note shall be reduced from $3,500,000.00 to $2,500,000.00 effective the
date hereof.

Except as expressly modified above, the Note remains unchanged and in full
force and effect.

| |                                                  |                             
| | ------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------
| | WINLAND ELECTRONICS INCORPORATED                
|
| | By:                                              | /s/ Lorin E. Krueger
CEO    
|
| | WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
|
| | By:                                              | /s/ illegible
Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00639]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of Intent To Terminate the 
Receivership of 10172, Evergreen Bank, Seattle, Washington

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC or Receiver) as Receiver for Evergreen Bank, Seattle, 
Washington, intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. 
The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Evergreen Bank on January 22, 2010. 
The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the 
extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the 
Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on January 10, 2018.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00639 Filed 1-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02902

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Jesse H. KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2444

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
SERVED: JULY 17,2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

..-·· 

. ~ . . __ ) ~ l . ,_, 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CLASSIC AIR AVIATION, LLC 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-2438 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

. ' ~-- ~-~ ... _ \.) 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2015WP910053) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

_ __.---/ \ rp ~(;··,/ Ro ··eA. Yoder 

Chief Admimstratlve Law Judg · 

··-··--···--

Attachment - Service List 

'·, 

1 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Kacie M. Bush, Operations Manager 

Classic Air Aviation, LLC, Respondent 

4805 E. Falcon Drive 

Mesa, AZ 85215 

TEL: 602-574-5376 

Michael Urbano, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices of Michael Urbano, PLLC 

4809 E. Thistle Drive, STE 100 

Phoenix, AZ 85042 

TEL: 480-759-0035 

FAX: 480-759-0042 

ONE COPY 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind A venue Southwest 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2438 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591;Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2 
TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

3
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Joseph Jenkins, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Kevin B. McGrath, J.), rendered January 23, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal possession of marijuana in the fifth degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Kevin B. McGrath, J.), rendered January 23, 2017, affirmed.</p><p>Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders</i>, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: December 10, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. VARIETY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1409

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 05, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1051 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to lower the standard for removing 

employees who disclose tax return information without authorization, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to lower the standard 

for removing employees who disclose tax return information without authorization, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Taxpayers’ 

5 Privacy Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1051 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF PENALTY FOR UNAUTHORIZED DIS2 CLOSURE OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 7213(a) 

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$250,000’’. 

6 (b) DISCLOSURES BY TAX RETURN PREPARERS.— 

7 Subsection (a) of section 7216 of the Internal Revenue 

8 Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000 ($100,000 

9 in the case of a disclosure or use to which section 6713(b) 

10 applies)’’ and inserting ‘‘$250,000’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to disclosures made on or after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 SEC. 3. REMOVAL. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7701(c)(1)(A) of title 5, 

16 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or in the 

17 case of an action involving a removal from the service for 

18 an alleged violation of section 7213(a)(1) of the Internal 

19 Revenue Code of 1986,’’ after ‘‘described in section 

20 4303,’’. 

21 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The amendments 

22 made by subsection (a) may not be construed to permit 

23 an officer or employee of the United States to submit an 

24 appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board if that indi25 vidual is dismissed from office or discharged from employVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:02 Apr 07, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1051.IS S1051

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 1051 IS

1 ment upon conviction for a violation of section 7213(a)(1) 

2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
K Akhnaten CASEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4800

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

s0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146624

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146624

COA: 311692

Ingham CC: 00-075424-FC

TYRONE HILL, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HD Supply, Inc.
(the Company), hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended February 2, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
March 25, 2014

/s/ EVAN J. LEVITT Evan J. Levitt Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 2810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00869]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; ESI MIRA Review.
    Date: March 1-2, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn Bethesda Downtown, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Manas Chattopadhyay, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 45, Room 3An12N, 45 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-5320, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 11, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-00869 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
  Name
    
    JurisdictionAd-Icon Company Limited
    
    Hong KongAd-Icon Shanghai Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaBeijing Wanshuizhiyuan Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaGreat Talent Holdings Limited
    
    Hong KongJieli Investment Management Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaJieli Network Technology Development (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaSearchMedia International Limited
    
    ChinaShanghai Botang Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaShanghai Haiya Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaShenyang Jingli Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaWuxi Ruizhong Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaZhejiang Continental Advertising Co, Ltd.
    
    China
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. JUAN PAB LO LOPEZ ORTIZ,

De fe nda n t-Appe l la

nt. No. 16-50032

D.C . No. 2:15-c r-00492-ODW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Otis D. W

right, II, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 14, 2017 * * B e fore : GOODW IN, FARR IS, an d FER NANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Jua n Pa b l o Lope z Ortiz a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e n t a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 46-m onth se nte nc e for be ing a n ille ga l a lie n found in the

Unite d Stat e s following de porta tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . 

# FIL ED FEB 21 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).§ 1326. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ortiz ’ s c o unse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re l ie f, a long with a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e have provide d Ortizthe opportunity to file a pro se supple m e n t a l brie f. No pro sesupple m e n ta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Ortizwa ive d his right to a ppe a l his c onvic tion, with the e xc e ption of a

n a ppe a l ba se d on a

c la im that his ple a

wa s involunta

ry . He a lso wa ive d the right to a ppe a l his se nte nc e , with thee xc e ption of thec ourt’ s c a l c ulat ion of his c rim ina l history c ate gory . Our indepe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f a s to the volunta rine ss of Ortiz ’ s ple a

or the c rim ina l history

c at e gory c a l c ulate d by

the c ourt. W e the re fore a ffirm a s to thoseissue s . W e dism iss the re m a inde r of the a ppe a l in light of the va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. Se e Unite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th C ir. 2009). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 6 - 5 0 0 3 2 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OS E AN T ON I O N AV AR R O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50621 D . C . N o. 2: 09 -c r- 00 62 2-R ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a nue l L . R e a l , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose A nt on i o N avarro appeal s f rom the 70 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for bei ng a f el on i n p osse ss i on of a f i re arm and am m un i t i on , i n v i ol at i on of 18 U . S . C . § 9 22 (g)( 1). W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED OC T 28 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50621 2 N avarro cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourtvi ol at ed F eder al R ul e of C ri m i nal P r o c e d u r e 3 2 ( i) ( 3 ) ( B ) w h e n it f a ile dto r e s o lv e ad is p u te r e g a r d in g th e f a c ts unde r l y i ng as e nt e nc i ng e nha nc e m e ntf orr e c kl e s s e nda nge rm e ntdur i ng f l i ght . B ut N avarro never ar gu ed thatthere w er e s peci fi c f ac tual errors i n the pres ent ence r e p o rt. A c c o r d in g ly , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t v io la te R u le 3 2 ( i) ( 3 ) ( B ) . See U ni ted State s v . Stote r au , 52 4 F . 3d 98 8, 10 11 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( “ O nl y s peci fi c f ac tual obj e c t i ons tr i gge rR ul e 32( i ) ( 3) ( B ) . ” ) . T o the e xt e ntN a va rr o now c ha l l e nge s the f a c tu a l b a s is f

o rth e e n h a n c e m e n t, th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t p la in lye rr . See U ni ted State s v . W

akni ne , 54 3 F . 3d 54 6, 55 3 n . 3 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). A FFI R M ED .
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2018

No. 04-17-00851-CV

Herman ADAMS,

Appellant

v.

MACLAMAR MANAGEMENT,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CV04194

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed 

against appellant in relation to this appeal because he is indigent.

It is so ORDERED on January 31, 2018.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of January, 2018.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court