alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,


18
U.S.C. Section 1350






I, Robert
Papiri, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Bhakti Capital Corp. (the
“Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:




1.  the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





Date:  March
29, 2010








By:/s/ Robert
Papiri


Robert Papiri


President, Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2
**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the quarterly report of Landmark Land Company, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Joe V. Olree, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   November 10, 2004 /s/ JOE V. OLREE  Joe V. Olree Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Landmark Land Company, Inc.
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0321.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:13PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/04/2010 11:02PM 

Subject: Fw: CMAQ documentation

See note from Amy below.

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/04/2010 11:02PM -----

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/04/2010 05:39PM 

cc: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: CMAQ documentation 

Melanie, 

Below is a link to the CMAQ documentation. Please forward to Cortney Higgins for 

distribution to the interagency group. Thanks! 

http://www.cmaq-model.org/op_guidance_4.6/index.cfm 

Amy Lamson 

Air Benefit and Cost Group 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

109 TW Alexander Dr. (C439-02) 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-4383 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desk...For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0321.txt (1 of 2)2/19/2010 12:50:40 PM
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0321.txt

Fax: (919) 541-0839 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desk...For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0321.txt (2 of 2)2/19/2010 12:50:40 PM
March 25, 2011 

Mr. Ed Lucke 

Acting Director of Aviation System Standards 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center 

6500 South Macarthur Boulevard 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169-6901 

Dear Mr. Lucke: 

This is in response to the Aviation System Standards letter dated January 19, 2011, (public 

docket No. FAA-2011-0073) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf 

of your organization for an exemption from § 183.1 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). The Aviation System Standards organization has requested relief from the 

requirement of being a private person in order to hold a delegation under part 183. 

Such relief is not available to AVN. The term “private person” is not within the FAA’s authority 

to redefine for individuals or organizations wishing to avail themselves of regulatory programs. 

The requirement comes directly from the FAA’s authorizing legislation in 49 USC § 40102(d). 

The agency cannot issue an exemption from its authorizing legislation. As recently as July 2010, 

the FAA’s Office of the Chief Counsel has affirmed that government organizations cannot 

qualify as private persons for purposes of delegation authority (Legal interpretation to David 

Hempe from Rebecca MacPherson, July 21, 2010 on the meaning of private person). Moreover, 

AVN already holds the authority it seeks through specific delegation from the Administrator. 

There is no need for a part 183 delegation for AVN to continue its delegated functions. 

We will close the docket on this request and take no further action. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       AND THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Christine Koenemann, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of Westbridge Research Group (the "Registrant"), does hereby certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to
                  which this certificate is attached as an exhibit (the
                  "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m), as amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.


July 15, 2005                                    /s/ Christine Koenemann
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Principal Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
No. 85-488.

#### Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al. *v.*Dayton Christian Schools, Inc., et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 474 U. S. 978.] Motion of appellants for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument granted.
Thomas KIERCE, DOC #H46233, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2777

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jessie WALSH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0044

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
L.W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0825

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act a meeting of the Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held on May 16-17, 2018 at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC. On May 16th, the session will be held in Room 630 and begin at 1:00 p.m. and end at 5 p.m. On May 17th, the session will be held in Room 830 and begin at 8 a.m. and end at 4:30 p.m. This meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of VA and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters pertaining to geriatrics and gerontology. The Committee assesses the capability of VA health care facilities and programs to meet the medical, psychological, and social needs of older Veterans and evaluates VA programs designated as Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.

The meeting will feature presentations and discussions on VA's geriatrics and extended care programs, aging research activities, updates on VA's employee staff working in the area of geriatrics (to include training, recruitment and retention approaches), Veterans Health Administration (VHA) strategic planning activities in geriatrics and extended care, recent VHA efforts regarding dementia and program advances in palliative care, and performance and oversight of VA Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.

                    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide written comments for review by the Committee to Mrs. Alejandra Paulovich, Program Analyst, Geriatrics and Extended Care (10NC4), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, or via email at                     *Alejandra.Paulovich@va.gov.*                     Individuals who wish to attend the meeting should contact Mrs. Paulovich at (202) 461-6016.                

Dated: January 10, 2018.

LaTonya L. Small,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-00613 Filed 1-12-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Donald P. Wells certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of JMG Exploration, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of JMG Exploration, Inc.  Date: May 16, 2007   /S/ Donald P. WellsName:Donald P. WellsTitle:Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

DAWAN DEONTE JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 21

- 30090

D.C. No. 1:18

- cr

- 00023

- SPW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021 * *

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Dawan Deonte Jones appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking

supervised release and imposing a 6

- month custodial sentence and 51

- month term

of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1 967),

Jones ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 30090

with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Jones has filed a pro se

supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

Jones’s pro se request to terminate his supervised release is d enied without

prejudice to renewal in the district court at the appropriate time. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e)(1).

Within 7 days of this disposition, appellee must serve the disposition on

appellant individually and provide the court with proof of service, including

appellant’s mailing address.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from the financial statements for Cambridge Advantaged Proper-
ties Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>	0000748847
<NAME> Cambridge Advantaged Properties Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>	1
       
<S>	<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>	9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	MAR-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>	MAR-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>	DEC-25-1998
<CASH>	14,415,115
<SECURITIES>	0
<RECEIVABLES>	0
<ALLOWANCES>	0
<INVENTORY>	0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	1,960,473
<PP&E>	184,366,086
<DEPRECIATION>	84,936,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	115,805,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	7,697,547
<BONDS>	212,683,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	0
<PREFERRED>	0
<COMMON>	0
<OTHER-SE>	(104,575,653)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	115,805,359
<SALES>	0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	22,586,433
<CGS>	0
<TOTAL-COSTS>	0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	22,828,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>	0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	6,743,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>	(6,985,495)
<INCOME-TAX>	0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	0
<DISCONTINUED>	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	10,877,495
<CHANGES>	0
<NET-INCOME>	3,887,564
<EPS-PRIMARY>	318.76
<EPS-DILUTED>	0

        

</TABLE>
Zachary Alan MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-418

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
----

| Date:  | November                13, 2007 |   |                                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                             | By:    | /s/                David L. Johnson                     |
|   |                             |   | David                L. Johnson                         |
|   |                             |   | Chairman                of the Board,                   |
|   |                             |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer of |
|   |                             |   | Maxus                Realty Trust, Inc.                 |
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2451

___________________________ National Green Gas, L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Estrategy, Inc., a corporation; Brian L. Sexton, individual lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellants Jamila Aldasheva, individual; Contracting Officer Department of Veterans Affairs lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant s

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: October 7, 2020 Filed: October 9, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Brian Sexton and eStrategy, Inc. appeal following the district court’s 1 adverse

judgment in a diversity action brought by National Green Gas, L.L.C. (NGG). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Martin, 854 F.3d 1021, 1025 (8th Cir. 2017) (denial of motion for summary judgment is reviewed de novo); United States v. STABL, Inc., 800 F.3d 476, 487 (8th Cir. 2015) (denial of continuance is reviewed de novo); Am. Bank of St. Paul v. TD Bank, N.A., 713 F.3d 455, 467 (8th Cir. 2013) (evidentiary rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion); Knutson v. Ag Processing, Inc., 394 F.3d 1047, 1050 (8th Cir. 2005) (appellate court upholds jury verdict unless it concludes that reasonable jury could not have found for that party); Mathenia v. Delo, 99 F.3d 1476, 1480 (8th Cir. 1996) (denial of Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion). We grant NGG’s motion to seal a portion of the appellate record, and eStrategy’s motion to take judicial notice of the district court’s ruling on Sexton’s post-trial motion; and we deny NGG’s motion to strike Sexton’s March 30 letter. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                         110,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     57,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,121
<PP&E>                                         301,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 380,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           548
<OTHER-SE>                                     329,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   380,342
<SALES>                                         93,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,069
<CGS>                                           44,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,687
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7750]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,194]


RR Donnelley and Sons, Inc.: Long Prairie, MN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 10, 2009, in response to a 
worker petition filed by the State of Minnesota on behalf of workers at 
RR Donnelley and Sons, Inc., Long Prairie, Minnesota.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of March 2009.
 Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-7750 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Bryce Chevelle HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 5D17-775 5D17-776 5D17-777

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN RE: David L. BELL

NO. 2018-B-0392

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 16, 2018

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension for Threat of Harm filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that respondent, David L. Bell, Louisiana Bar Roll number 24020, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis *964pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.2, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Office of Disciplinary Counsel may seek the appointment of a trustee(s) to protect the interests of respondent's clients pursuant to the provisions of Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 27, if appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Seal Exhibit 5 (in globo) filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel be and hereby is granted.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this _____ day of ___________________, 2018.

FOR THE COURT:

*/s/*

JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA