alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10850 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANDREILLY FERNANDEZ-GATO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:07-CR-10-2 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to representAndreilly Fernandez-Gato has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with A nders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Fernandez-Gato has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of NPC International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James K.
Schwartz, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of NPC International, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 8, 2010



/s/ James K. SchwartzJames K. SchwartzPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
N 

FILED 

SEP - 8 2011 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Clerk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of ColumbIa 

James F. McMillan, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

United States of America, 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

11 161a 

This action, brought pro se, is before the Court on the petitioner's application for a writ of 

habeas corpus, accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will 

grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

The petitioner is a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary McCreary in Pine Knot, 

Kentucky. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his sodomy conviction 

entered by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus by a Person in Custody in the District of Columbia at 2, 5-6. 

It is established that challenges to a Superior Court judgment of conviction must be 

pursued in that court under D.C. Code § 23-110, see Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1042-43 

(D.C. Cir. 1998); Byrd v. Henderson, 119 F.3d 34, 36-37 (D.C. Cir. 1997), and that absent a 

showing of an inadequate or ineffective local remedy, "a District of Columbia prisoner has no 

recourse to a federal judicial forum." Garris v. Lindsay, 794 F.2d 722, 726 (D.C. Cir. 1986), 

cert. denied, 479 U.S. 993 (1986) (internal footnote omitted). Under District of Columbia law, 

[an] application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to 

3 
apply for relief by motion pursuant to this section shall not be entertained by ... any 

Federal ... court if it appears ... that the Superior Court has denied him relief, unless 

it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the 

legality of his detention. 

D.C. Code §23-11 O(g). The petitioner has not shown that his local remedy is inadequate to 

address his claims. Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the instant petition. A separate 

Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum ~~&; 15 ;I-;G ... 

Unitld ltates District Judge 

Date: 4·tt., 3 ,2011 

2
| 1.   | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rider Exploration, Inc.; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule s 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Dated: |   | April 13, 2010                |   |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |                          |   |
|   | /s/    |   | Steve Friberg                 |   |
|   | Name:  |   | Steve Friberg                 |   |
|   |   |   |                          |   |
|   | Title: |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Lorin E. Krueger, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Winland Electronics, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.          Dated: November 6, 2006 /s/ Lorin E. Krueger         Lorin E. Krueger    Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Lorin E. Krueger, President and Chief Executive Officer of Winland Electronics, Inc., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Winland Electronics, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 11, 2005 /s/ Lorin E. Krueger  Lorin E. Krueger  Chief Executive Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1112 

To amend the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 to clarify whistleblower 

rights and protections, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. LANKFORD, 

and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 to clarify 

whistleblower rights and protections, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Energy 

5 and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Whistleblower Pro6 tection Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF WHISTLEBLOWER RIGHTS AND 

8 PROTECTIONS. 

9 Section 211 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 

10 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5851) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 1112 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

3 (i) in the first sentence, by striking 

4 ‘‘person in’’ and inserting ‘‘employer in’’; 

5 and 

6 (ii) in the second sentence, by striking 

7 ‘‘the person’’ and inserting ‘‘the em8 ployer’’; and 

9 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

10 (i) by striking ‘‘the person’’ each place 

11 it appears and inserting ‘‘the employer’’; 

12 and 

13 (ii) in subparagraph (B), in the first 

14 sentence, by striking ‘‘such person’’ and 

15 inserting ‘‘such employer’’; 

16 (2) in subsection (d), in the first sentence, by 

17 striking ‘‘a person’’ and inserting ‘‘an employer’’; 

18 and 

19 (3) in subsection (e)(1), in the first sentence, by 

20 striking ‘‘the person’’ and inserting ‘‘the employer’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Ricky ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1917

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Teresa A. GRODZKI, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2570

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 63 (Friday, April 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Notification of Pricing for the United States Mint 2009 
Presidential $1 Coin Uncirculated Set <SUP>TM</SUP>

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing the price of the 2009 
Presidential $1 Coin Uncirculated Set. The 2009 Presidential $1 Coin 
Uncirculated Set will be priced at $15.95. This set contains eight 
Presidential $1 Coins: four from the United States Mint at 
Philadelphia, and four from the United States Mint at Denver. The 2009 
Presidential $1 Coin Uncirculated Set will be offered for sale in the 
spring of 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: B. B. Craig, Associate Director for 
Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street, NW.; 
Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

    Authority:  31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701.

    Dated: March 30, 2009.
Andrew Brunhart,
Deputy Director, United States Mint.
 [FR Doc. E9-7514 Filed 4-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 3(g)

                                     FORM 19
                                  (Section 348)
                          PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

                                                                Certificate of
                                                                Inc. No. 186138

                                   COMPANY ACT
                                   -----------

                               SPECIAL RESOLUTION


         The following special resolution was passed by the undermentioned
Company on the date stated:

NAME OF COMPANY:           ALASKA APOLLO RESOURCES INC.

DATE RESOLUTION PASSED:    JUNE 22, 1998

RESOLUTION:

RESOLVED AS SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS THAT:


1.       The Company consolidate all of the 6,000,000 preferred shares without
         par value of which none are issued and outstanding, into 1,200,000
         preferred shares without par value, every five (5) preferred shares
         without par value being consolidate into one (1) preferred share.

     2. Paragraph 2 of the Memorandum be altered to read as follows:

         "2.      The authorized capital of the Company consists of 11,200,000
                  shares divided into:

                           10,000,000 common shares without par value; and
                           1,200,000 preferred shares without par value

                           having attached thereto the special rights and
                           restrictions set forth in the Articles of the
                           Company."

The Memorandum, as altered, is attached hereto as Schedule "A".

Certified a true copy the 25nd day of June, 1998.

                                      (Signature)   /s/ Ron Paton
                                                 -------------------------------

                                      (Relationship to Company)  Solicitor



<PAGE>   2


SCHEDULE "A" ATTACHED TO AND FORMING PART OF A SPECIAL RESOLUTION OF ALASKA
APOLLO RESOURCES INC. PASSED ON THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1998.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                   COMPANY ACT
                                   -----------


                               ALTERED MEMORANDUM



1.       The name of the Company is Daugherty Resources, Inc.

2.       The authorized capital of the Company consists of 11,200,000 shares
         divided into:

                  10,000,000 common shares without par value; and 1,200,000
                  preferred shares without par value

                  having attached thereto the special rights and restrictions
                    set forth in the Articles of the Company.






                                       2
STATE of Louisiana v. Blaise GRAVOIS

NO. 2018-K-0100

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 2018

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
Spencer GRAFFAM and Jodi Graffam, Appellants, v. Carolyn BEVIS, Drew Brooks and Joyce Bevis, Appellees.

No. 4D17-712

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 7, 2017]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of ETFS Platinum Trust (the Trust) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Quigley,
principal financial officer of ETF Securities USA LLC, the Sponsor of the
Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Trust.

|                                       |  
|-------------------------------------- | -
|/s/ Thomas
 Quigley                    | *
|                                       |  
|Thomas
 Quigley**                      |  
|Chief
 Financial Officer and Treasurer |  
|(principal
 financial officer)         |  
|                                      
|Date: March 28,
 2011                  |  

|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|*  | The
 originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
 Sponsors offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|** | The
 Registrant is a trust and Mr. Quigley is signing in his capacity as an
 officer of ETF Securities USA LLC, the sponsor of the Trust.               

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of SeaLife  Corporation (the Company),  does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for four month period ended  September 30,
2004  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in all  material  respects,  with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


            November 4, 2004

                                      By:  /S/ ROBERT A. MCCASLIN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert A. McCaslin,
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
Ongoing