alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 10278]

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Klimt and Schiele: Drawn,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, in Boston, Massachusetts, from on or about February 25, 2018, until on or about May 28, 2018, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elliot Chiu in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015). I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                     **Federal Register.**

Alyson Grunder,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-00910 Filed 1-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS*

I, Thomas M. Von Lehman, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report of R. G. Barry Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
April 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of R. G. Barry Corporation.

                           By: /s/ Thomas M. Von Lehman*
                               ------------------------------------
                           Thomas M. Von Lehman,
                           Title: Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
                           (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Daniel D. Viren, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report of R. G. Barry Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
April 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of R. G. Barry Corporation.

                             By: /s/ Daniel D. Viren*
                                 ------------------------------------
                             Daniel D. Viren
                             Title: Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief
                               Financial Officer,
                             Secretary and Treasurer
                             (Principal Financial Officer)

      *These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b)
      under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section
      1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be
      deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that Section. These certifications shall not
      be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
      Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in
      such filing.

                                     Page 24
L.B., the Mother, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2560

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

FEBRUARY 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Kraig CONSTANTINO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Chris NOCCO, Sheriff of Pasco County, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4181

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medical Action Industries Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Richard G. Satin, Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of Operations and General Counsel of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard G. Satin                                                         
|Principal Financial Officer, Vice President of Operations and General Counsel
|                                                                             
|Date: February 4, 2005
Jonas Alexis Rodgriguez DEL VALLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ON BEHALF OF Glendaliz GUADALUPE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2935

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Kelly Pechin MARTIN, Appellant, v. JACARANDA COMMONS, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4437

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|                         | Winland      Electronics, Inc. |                                       |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                         |                           |                                       |   |
| Date:       May 1, 2009 | By:                            | /s/ Thomas      J. de Petra           |   |
|                         |                           | Thomas      J. de Petra                    |   |
|                         |                           | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                         |                           |                                       |   |
Lawrence Antwan CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-0733

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

61 

CAF 10-00475 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF PAIGE K. AND NICHOLAS T. 

-------------------------------------------- 

OSWEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

JAY J.B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

DAVISON LAW OFFICE, PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

CARACCIOLI & NELSON, PLLC, MEXICO (ANNALISE M. DYKAS OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

SUSAN B. MARRIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, MANLIUS, FOR PAIGE K. AND

NICHOLAS T. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Kimberly

M. Seager, J.), entered February 1, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudged

that respondent had neglected and abused the subject children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act

article 10, Family Court granted petitioner’s motion for summary

judgment on the petition, which sought a determination that respondent

abused his girlfriend’s son and derivatively neglected the son’s older

sister. We note at the outset that respondent’s contentions concern

only the alleged derivative neglect of the sister, and that he does

not challenge the finding of abuse in connection with his girlfriend’s

son. In addition, we note that respondent’s contentions in opposition

to the motion for summary judgment are raised for the first time on

appeal and are therefore not properly before us (see Ciesinski v Town

of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985). In any event, contrary to respondent’s

contention, petitioner established as a matter of law that respondent

was a person legally responsible for the sister (see § 1012 [g]; see

generally Matter of Yolanda D., 88 NY2d 790, 796) and that, when he

abused his girlfriend’s son by murdering him, he thereby derivatively

neglected the sister (see Matter of Justice T., 305 AD2d 1076, lv

denied 100 NY2d 512; see generally Matter of Jovon J., 51 AD3d 1395;

Matter of Seth G., 50 AD3d 1530). Contrary to the contention of

respondent, he failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally 
-2- 61 

CAF 10-00475 

Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). 

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
Anthony Gerald HOLLEY, Appellant, v. Debra Ann GREEN, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2682

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 15787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [74 FR 14829, April 
1, 2009.]

Status: Closed Meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: Thursday, April 2, 2009 
at 2 p.m.

Change in the Meeting: Time Change.
    The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 2 p.m. 
has been changed to Thursday, April 2, 2009 at 3 p.m.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: April 2, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-7848 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Isaac CHAPPELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4183

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ricardo BURTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3240

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
missions - Unit Level Data Report 

ep 12, 2014 

ur query will return 391 Facility(s) and 1474 Unit(s) 

ogram: All Programs 

ata Set: Emissions - Unit Level Data 

me Frame: Emissions : 

nual : 2002 

iteria: State : Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, 

ginia, West Virginia, New York, District Of Columbia 

gregate Criteria: State 

e, Facility ID (ORISPL}, Year, S02 (tons), NOx (tons) 

Facility Name 

Facility ID (ORISPL) Year S02 (tons) 

null null 2002 1,087.2 

null null 2002 353,228.3 

null null 2002 778,868 

null null 2002 482,653.3 

null null 2002 254,007.9 

null null 2002 342,998.6 

null null 2002 462,993.1 

null null 2002 48,269.2 

null null 2002 231,973.2 

null null 2002 1,132,069 

null null 2002 230,845.7 

null null 2002 507,110 

NOx (tons) 

556.4 

172,353.8 

281 '146.1 

198,598.6 

76,056.1 

132,623.4 

145,705.7 

36,149.4 

84,884.6 

370,497.3 

78,867.5 

225,370.6 
missions - Unit Level Data Report 

ep 12, 2014 

our query will return 508 Facility(s) and 1890 Unit(s) 

ogram: All Programs 

ata Set Emissions - Unit Level Data 

me Frame: Emissions : 

nnual : 2007 

iteria: State : Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, 

rginia, West Virginia, New York, District Of Columbia 

ggregate Criteria: State 

me, Facility ID (ORISPL), Year, S02 (tons), NOx (tons) 

Facility Name Facility ID (ORISPL) Year S02 (tons) 

null null 2007 318.6 

null null 2007 272,570.7 

null null 2007 714,529.2 

null null 2007 380,313.9 

null null 2007 272,879.2 

null null 2007 338,013.8 

null null 2007 370,826.5 

null null 2007 34,189.1 

null null 2007 107,210.5 

null null 2007 954,645.8 

null null 2007 172,685.2 

null null 2007 371,996.4 

.· 

NOx (tons) 

250.2 

123,105.1 

198,501.2 

174,931.6 

54,553.3 

108,198.4 

64,769.8 

17,058.9 

58,569.2 

240,722 

60,302.2 

153,514.4 
missions - Unit Level Data Report 

ep 12, 2014 

ur query will return 559 Facility(s) and 1811 Unit(s) 

ogram: All Programs 

ata Set: Emissions - Unit Level Data 

me Frame: Emissions : 

nnual: 2013 

iteria: State : District Of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, New 

rk, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia 

gregate Criteria: State 

e, Facility ID (ORISPL), Year, S02 (tons), NOx (tons) 

Facility Name Facility ID (ORISPL) Year S02 (tons) 

null null 2013 

null null 2013 135,866.4 

null null 2013 268,217.3 

null null 2013 188,115 

null null 2013 25,117.5 

null null 2013 194,395.9 

null null 2013 48,153.8 

null null 2013 2,432.5 

null null 2013 17,797.1 

null null 2013 282,007.2 

null null 2013 38,778.2 

null null 2013 1.8 

null null 2013 2,858.9 

null null 2013 62,434.3 

null null 2013 86,201 .1 

-

NOx (tons) 

96.1 

55,385.9 

103,120.6 

84,963.8 

14,453.9 

65,727.7' 

49,059.3 ' 

5,713.11 

24,149.91 

86,399.2 

28,315.4 

183.2 

8,333.4 

25,604.3 

60,111.1
Emmett J. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed September 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Richard RIVERS, et al. v. The STATE of Louisiana, et al.

NO. 2017-CC-2082

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 9, 2018

Denied.
Douglas Lee DIERSHOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4591

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60704 Summary Calendar

__________________
BRYAN WASHINGTON; JAMES M. LYLE, IV, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus JOE PRICE, Sheriff; RICK GASTON, Capt.; JIMMY JOHNSON, Captain; CRAIN, Dr.; JACKIE NEELY, Nurse; DIANE ELLINGTON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:95CV26RR

- - - - - - - - - - July 24, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James M. Lyle, IV, Mississippi state prisoner #84998, appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants in Lyle's civil rights suit. Lyle's notice of appeal was purportedly filed on behalf of both Lyle and Bryan Washington. Because Washington did not sign the notice of appeal, however, the notice is not effective as to Washington.No. 95-60704 -2-
See Carter v. Stalder , 60 F.3d 238, 239 (5th Cir. 1995). The appeal is therefore DISMISSED as to Washington for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Lyle argues that the district court erred by granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment without first conducting an evidentiary hearing, that the district court failed to consider Lyle's brief in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, and that the district court erred by adopting verbatim the defendants' brief in support of their motion for summary judgment as its own memorandum order. The district court was not required to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the defendants' summary-judgment motion. See Daniels v. Morris , 746 F.2d 271, 274-75 (5th Cir. 1984). Further, Lyle has failed to demonstrate that the affidavits filed by him in response to the motion for summary judgment were not received and considered by the district court. Finally, Lyle has offered this court no support for his assertion that the district court is prohibited from adopting the legal analysis and reasoning set forth in a brief submitted in support of a summary-judgment motion as its own memorandum order. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 20, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 20, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0005. JOSEPH HUNTER RICKS v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17CR01167
Ronald SOLORZANO, DOC# S15106, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D15-3810

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed November 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Patrick MICKLEWHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3417

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 15, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 16034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 01/01-0414]


Ironwood Mezzanine Fund II, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under 
Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Ironwood Mezzanine Fund II, L.P. 200 
Fisher Drive, Avon, CT 06001-3723, a Federal Licensee under the Small 
Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Ironwood Mezzanine Fund II, L.P. proposes to provide debt/equity 
security financing to Action Carting Environmental Services, Inc., 451 
Frelinghuysen Avenue, Newark, NJ 07114. The financing is contemplated 
as part of $6 million debt/equity issuance, the proceeds of which will 
be used primarily pay down the outstanding revolver and equipment debt.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a) of 
the Regulations because Ironwood Equity Fund, L.P., an Associate of 
Ironwood Mezzanine Fund II, L.P., owns more than ten percent of Action 
Carting Environmental Services, Inc., and this transaction is 
considered a Financing of an Associate requiring an exemption to the 
Regulations.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction within 15 days of the date of 
publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small 
Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: March 23, 2009.
Harry Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
 [FR Doc. E9-7879 Filed 4-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
## ZUCKER T SCOUT T £r

RASENBERGER , LL. P A I !1>KN ! \> M ! \ U 88 8 Seventeent h Street , NV Y Washington , D C 20006-550 9 Telephon e [202 ] 298-866 0 Fa x [202 ) 542-068 5

wwwzsrlawco m

DAVI D M . ENDERSBE

E DIREC T DIA L (202 ) 973-793 5 dmendersbee@zsrlaw.co m Marc h24 , 201 0

B Y HAN D 3 Rud y Spruil l ' -, Offic e o f Informatio n Service s : . U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n ; ;r; ' 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.W . Ep j Washington , D.C . 2059 0 • ' C D

Re : Applicatio n o f

Alitali a- Compagni aAere aItalian aS.p . A . (Docke t OST-2002-12896 ) Dea r Mr . Spruill : O n Marc h19 , 2010 , Alitali a- Compagni aAere aItalian aS.p.A . ("Alitalia" ) file da n Applicatio n fo r

a n Amende dStatemen t o f Authorizatio n i n th e above-reference ddocket . Alitali aha s complete dpollin g an dn o carrie r ha s objecte dt o th e gran t o f it s application . W e respectfull y reques t tha t th e Departmen t

procee dt o gran t

thi s applicatio n a s soo n a s possible .

Davi dM . Endersbe e

cc : servic e lis t
K.E. and K.T., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-5584

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.